Has the flute lower "status" than other woodwind instruments in the orchestra?

Started by Bruckner is God, December 17, 2008, 03:20:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bruckner is God

I have the impression that playing the flute doesn't have the same status as other instruments in the woodwind family, like the oboe or basoon.
Why is this? I think the flute produces a wonderful sound. Is it because it is considered an easier instrument to play than others?
I have heard that many flute players feel left out, and that many conductors have little or no respect for them. Is this true or is it just a myth?

ChamberNut

In our city's orchestra, the opposite would be the case.

The principal flutist (flautist? ???) is one of the most respected and revered members of the entire orchestra, let alone the woodwind section.  He's also one of the longest serving members of the orchestra.


AB68

Hmmm... maybe it is because lots of flute players are women? They often don't get the respect they deserve.


Mark G. Simon

I've never heard of such a thing. Lower status in what way? That they get paid less? That doesn't make any sense. Think of how many flute solos there are in the orchestral literature. As the highest instrument in the woodwind texture, the flute is always noticed.

david johnson

i've never heard that 'the flute has lower "status" than other woodwind instruments'.

dj