The right way to go for Chopin's Piano Concerti?

Started by Mark, June 07, 2007, 02:57:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bunny

The picture isn't very good; translation, please.  0:)

Mark


Botafogo

Quote from: Bunny on June 11, 2007, 02:56:32 PM
The picture isn't very good; translation, please.  0:)

Chopin
Piano Concertos
Grigory Ginzburg
(I don't get to read)
Leningrad Symphony (?) Orchestra.

Kindest regards.

orbital

Quote from: Botafogo on June 11, 2007, 07:23:35 PM
Chopin
Piano Concertos
Grigory Ginzburg
(I don't get to read)
Leningrad Symphony (?) Orchestra.

Kindest regards.
Amazing  :o

Except it does not really exist. I was bored a little   :-*

Botafogo

Quote from: orbital on June 11, 2007, 07:28:05 PM
Amazing  :o

Except it does not really exist. I was bored a little   :-*

Just curious: what's the word below Grigory Ginzburg?

Rgds.


Botafogo


lukeottevanger

Is there something I don't know? I keep thinking Gilels when I think about Chopin PC1 - and yet no one has so much as breathed his name on this thread yet. Is it thought of as that bad a recording?  ??? ???  Is it because Ormandy is involved? (He doesn't do so badly, I think!). It's always sounded pretty special to my ears - Gilels works a certain magic here to make it much more than 'another great concerto performance'. I may be reading more into it - when I was a boy my dad would rhapsodise to me about the first time he heard that LP and years later, warped and unplayable, it still had a place in his LP collection. But trying to put that aside, it still seems at least to rank among the better recordings I've heard.

Am I that misguided? ??? ;D

BachQ

Quote from: lukeottevanger on June 12, 2007, 01:23:26 AM
Is there something I don't know? I keep thinking Gilels when I think about Chopin PC1 - and yet no one has so much as breathed his name on this thread yet. Is it thought of as that bad a recording?  ??? ???  Is it because Ormandy is involved? (He doesn't do so badly, I think!). It's always sounded pretty special to my ears - Gilels works a certain magic here to make it much more than 'another great concerto performance'. I may be reading more into it - when I was a boy my dad would rhapsodise to me about the first time he heard that LP and years later, warped and unplayable, it still had a place in his LP collection. But trying to put that aside, it still seems at least to rank among the better recordings I've heard.

Am I that misguided? ??? ;D

Does Luke always talk to himself ?  >:D

lukeottevanger

Quote from: D Minor on June 12, 2007, 03:55:10 AM
Does Luke always talk to himself ?  >:D

Who you talking to, D?

Although, yes, I do get that feeling very often. The essence of omphaloskepsis, you know....

George

Quote from: lukeottevanger on June 12, 2007, 01:23:26 AM
Is there something I don't know? I keep thinking Gilels when I think about Chopin PC1 - and yet no one has so much as breathed his name on this thread yet. Is it thought of as that bad a recording?  ??? ???  Is it because Ormandy is involved? (He doesn't do so badly, I think!). It's always sounded pretty special to my ears - Gilels works a certain magic here to make it much more than 'another great concerto performance'. I may be reading more into it - when I was a boy my dad would rhapsodise to me about the first time he heard that LP and years later, warped and unplayable, it still had a place in his LP collection. But trying to put that aside, it still seems at least to rank among the better recordings I've heard.

Am I that misguided? ??? ;D

Nope, I plan to snatch that one up the next time I see it used. Thanks.  :)

SimonGodders

Quote from: lukeottevanger on June 12, 2007, 01:23:26 AM
Is there something I don't know? I keep thinking Gilels when I think about Chopin PC1 - and yet no one has so much as breathed his name on this thread yet. Is it thought of as that bad a recording?  ??? ???  Is it because Ormandy is involved? (He doesn't do so badly, I think!). It's always sounded pretty special to my ears - Gilels works a certain magic here to make it much more than 'another great concerto performance'. I may be reading more into it - when I was a boy my dad would rhapsodise to me about the first time he heard that LP and years later, warped and unplayable, it still had a place in his LP collection. But trying to put that aside, it still seems at least to rank among the better recordings I've heard.

Am I that misguided? ??? ;D

He's also on Melodiya with Kondrashin conducting from 1962 ;)

George

Quote from: SimonGodders on June 12, 2007, 07:12:47 AM
He's also on Melodiya with Kondrashin conducting from 1962 ;)

Saw that box this morning for $150.  :o

SimonGodders

Quote from: George on June 12, 2007, 07:14:18 AM
Saw that box this morning for $150.  :o

Crikey, certainly didn't pay that much for it! (£25 off ebay)


George

Quote from: SimonGodders on June 12, 2007, 07:20:23 AM
Crikey, certainly didn't pay that much for it! (£25 off ebay)



[insert envy emoticon here]


SimonGodders


George

Quote from: SimonGodders on June 12, 2007, 07:28:11 AM
:)

I always buy my Russian stuff from Victor Dublier, George. He's still got both sets at the same price I bought them last year. I'm sure he ships all over the world...

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GILELS-5CD-BOX-Art-of-Gilels-MELODIYA-NEW_W0QQitemZ110036365651QQihZ001QQcategoryZ307QQcmdZViewItem

The Chopin PC1 is in this box:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GILELS-Recitals-of-1962-MELODIYA-5CD-BOX-NEW_W0QQitemZ110022678186QQihZ001QQcategoryZ307QQcmdZViewItem

How's the rest of the box?

George, who is already so poor he can't even pay attention at this point.  :-[

Drasko

Isn't that Chopin PC 1 with Kondrashin also in Brilliant box?

Anyhow here is the single disc, and you can listen to whole thing online.

http://www.russiandvd.com/store/product.asp?sku=35614&genreid=

sidoze

Quote from: lukeottevanger on June 12, 2007, 01:23:26 AM
Is there something I don't know? I keep thinking Gilels when I think about Chopin PC1 - and yet no one has so much as breathed his name on this thread yet. Is it thought of as that bad a recording?  ??? ???  Is it because Ormandy is involved? (He doesn't do so badly, I think!). It's always sounded pretty special to my ears - Gilels works a certain magic here to make it much more than 'another great concerto performance'. I may be reading more into it - when I was a boy my dad would rhapsodise to me about the first time he heard that LP and years later, warped and unplayable, it still had a place in his LP collection. But trying to put that aside, it still seems at least to rank among the better recordings I've heard.

Am I that misguided? ??? ;D

I haven't heard this one but used to have the Gilels / Kondrashin in the Brilliant box. What can I say? It's just not what I want to hear in this work, though no doubt it's very good. I should send you the Sokolov recording for curiosity's sake.

Of course I can't play the Chopin PC 1, so for all I know, Gilels' could be very special indeed.

(the above in no way passes Zimerman's solo plodding as fit for measure)

And thanks for the new word: omphaloskepsis

SimonGodders

Quote from: George on June 12, 2007, 07:30:22 AM
How's the rest of the box?

George, who is already so poor he can't even pay attention at this point.  :-[

I'ld like to give you a definitive answer, but bought both sets about this time last year and still haven't got through all discs, maybe half :-\

I have enjoyed all that I have listened to thus far (great Beethoven, partic. WoO 80 Variations and a gorgeous Chopin Ballade in G minor), but then I am a Gilels 'aficionado'...

The aforementioned Chopin PC1 I haven't listened to, despite my love of Chopin, never been particularly struck by his orchestral music. Perhaps I'll give it a whizz in a jiffy...