Author Topic: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)  (Read 95986 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #440 on: February 12, 2020, 10:10:23 AM »
Ordered a copy of Myaskovsky's Cello Concerto coupled with Prokofiev's Symphony-Concerto. Maisky/Russian National Orchestra/Pletnev.
The Myaskovsky is a great work. I much prefer it to the Prokofiev.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Offline Irons

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #441 on: February 13, 2020, 12:55:33 AM »
Very interesting analysis Lol. There is a kind of authenticity about those old Soviet recordings which adds to the atmosphere for me. I was very lucky to attend a live performance of the work in London conducted by Vladimir Jurowski whom I had the pleasure of meeting. I wish that the recording was issued on CD. In the rehearsal I recall him requiring the LPO choir to 'sound like Demons from Hell' at the opening of the wailing choir in the fourth movement and telling the ladies of the choir that they needed to sound like 'Russian peasant women'.

I would love to attend a concert of the 6th, or any other Miaskovsky symphony, Jeffrey. In the country of his birth would probably be a step too far - although I did for a Prokofiev ballet - a Prom would be great. 
You must have a very good opinion of yourself to write a symphony - John Ireland.

Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #442 on: February 13, 2020, 01:49:26 AM »
I would love to attend a concert of the 6th, or any other Miaskovsky symphony, Jeffrey. In the country of his birth would probably be a step too far - although I did for a Prokofiev ballet - a Prom would be great.
Apparently it was performed in Manchester recently Lol.

https://seenandheard-international.com/2020/02/sinaisky-and-the-bbc-phil-look-east-from-manchester/

« Last Edit: February 13, 2020, 01:54:22 AM by vandermolen »
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Offline Irons

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #443 on: February 17, 2020, 01:48:17 PM »
8th Symphony.

Right from the opening bars this symphony does not have a bad word to say, and I love that. More contentment then unbridled joy. Miaskovsky shows this work as another side of his nature and I find this most attractive. All four movements are excellent but the third is something else, for those unconvinced of the composer listen to this movement on YT. A critic described it as “Delius of the Steppes”, I beg to differ, if Delius has written anything as beautiful I have yet to hear it.

The sound of this set I find so far as variable. Svetlanov’s 6th pretty poor, no.5 OK and no.3 excellent. This, the 8th, is thankfully as good as the 3rd and such beautiful orchestration deserves nothing less.

I’m not claiming this the best so far, I believe that to be the 6th. But the 8th is the one that gave the most pleasure to this listener.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2020, 01:50:10 PM by Irons »
You must have a very good opinion of yourself to write a symphony - John Ireland.

Offline BasilValentine

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 1070
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #444 on: February 17, 2020, 02:05:18 PM »
8th Symphony.

Right from the opening bars this symphony does not have a bad word to say, and I love that. More contentment then unbridled joy. Miaskovsky shows this work as another side of his nature and I find this most attractive. All four movements are excellent but the third is something else, for those unconvinced of the composer listen to this movement on YT. A critic described it as “Delius of the Steppes”, I beg to differ, if Delius has written anything as beautiful I have yet to hear it.

The sound of this set I find so far as variable. Svetlanov’s 6th pretty poor, no.5 OK and no.3 excellent. This, the 8th, is thankfully as good as the 3rd and such beautiful orchestration deserves nothing less.

I’m not claiming this the best so far, I believe that to be the 6th. But the 8th is the one that gave the most pleasure to this listener.

The 9th is my favorite among the early ones but, alas, in the Svetlanov performance the first movement is so lugubrious that I couldn't get through it. It starts out grim but ends optimistically.


Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #445 on: February 17, 2020, 02:32:07 PM »
8th Symphony.

Right from the opening bars this symphony does not have a bad word to say, and I love that. More contentment then unbridled joy. Miaskovsky shows this work as another side of his nature and I find this most attractive. All four movements are excellent but the third is something else, for those unconvinced of the composer listen to this movement on YT. A critic described it as “Delius of the Steppes”, I beg to differ, if Delius has written anything as beautiful I have yet to hear it.

The sound of this set I find so far as variable. Svetlanov’s 6th pretty poor, no.5 OK and no.3 excellent. This, the 8th, is thankfully as good as the 3rd and such beautiful orchestration deserves nothing less.

I’m not claiming this the best so far, I believe that to be the 6th. But the 8th is the one that gave the most pleasure to this listener.
That slow movement of No.8 is very special and I'm glad you enjoyed it Lol. There is also a recording of the work on Marco Polo which is where I first discovered it. Stankovsky conducted the first recording of Symphony No.6 to be released on CD and I rate that version very highly although some others don't. I much prefer it to the (perfectly serviceable) recording by Dudarova for example.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2020, 02:36:01 PM by vandermolen »
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #446 on: February 17, 2020, 02:37:39 PM »
The 9th is my favorite among the early ones but, alas, in the Svetlanov performance the first movement is so lugubrious that I couldn't get through it. It starts out grim but ends optimistically.
Must listen to No.9 again. I think that Edward Downes recorded it for Marco Polo.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Offline Irons

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #447 on: Today at 12:30:26 AM »
The 9th is my favorite among the early ones but, alas, in the Svetlanov performance the first movement is so lugubrious that I couldn't get through it. It starts out grim but ends optimistically.

Next up is 11th I think. As Svetlanov is the 9th I have, after reading your post not sorry I’m missing it.

Jeffrey, uncanny effect from the strings at the opening and coda of the third movement. The sound was of a hushed choir.
You must have a very good opinion of yourself to write a symphony - John Ireland.

Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #448 on: Today at 12:47:13 AM »
Next up is 11th I think. As Svetlanov is the 9th I have, after reading your post not sorry I’m missing it.

Jeffrey, uncanny effect from the strings at the opening and coda of the third movement. The sound was of a hushed choir.

No.11 is very good indeed. I have the old Olympia recording conducted by Veronika Dudarova, coupled with Symphony No.5 (Ivanov conducting). I like the cover photo which reminds me of my visit to the USSR over New Year 1985. I'll post it if I can find it.
Here it is:
« Last Edit: Today at 12:50:00 AM by vandermolen »
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Offline vandermolen

  • Silver Subscriber
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 15713
  • Location: Rotherfield, Sussex, UK
Re: Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)
« Reply #449 on: Today at 12:55:38 AM »
Those old Olympias had some nice cover art:



« Last Edit: Today at 12:58:28 AM by vandermolen »
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).