Nikolay Miaskovsky (1881-1950)

Started by vandermolen, June 12, 2007, 01:21:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

vandermolen

#560
Quote from: Mirror Image on May 10, 2020, 09:00:42 AM
I need to dip back into Myaskovsky's symphonies. I had recently bought (before the pandemic) the complete symphony sets on Olympia and the SQs on Northern Flowers, but haven't cracked either open yet. I own the initial set of symphonies on the Warner label, but it had several defective discs and it seems that it wasn't just one time problem, I had bought another one and the same errors occurred, so I decided to keep it on the condition the seller reimburse me for the shipping, which they thankfully did. Anyway, I'll be posting my thoughts here in the next week or so. I recall being hugely impressed with the later symphonies, but this has been quite some time ago since I've heard any of them. The main caveat of the newer Olympia set is it doesn't have a lot of the bonus works that came with the Warner set. I'll have to see if there's a separate issue on Olympia containing these works or perhaps someone here knows off-hand if such a recording exists?
I'll be very interested to know what you think of it John. When you say 'Olympia' do you mean the new Alto boxed set (the same recordings as on Olympia and Warner)? If so be aware that the booklet inadvertently missed out the notes for four of the twenty-seven symphonies due to an oversight. However Alto have now loaded them up (typed out by me - a long story), so if you find the boxed set on their website you can download the missing notes. I'll try to find a link in a moment:

Here they are (yellow link):
https://altocd.com/product/alc3141

PS remember that Svetlanov's very good performance of the epic Symphony No.6 in the boxed set does not feature the optional chorus at the end, which I think is a pity. However, I think that you'll find that you do possess a different performance in your collection, also on Alto, featuring the choir at the end.
8)
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Maestro267

I'm curious to hear a version of No. 6 with the choir. To me, I don't feel like the finale is lacking in any way at all.

Mirror Image

#562
Quote from: vandermolen on May 10, 2020, 10:22:00 PM
I'll be very interested to know what you think of it John. When you say 'Olympia' do you mean the new Alto boxed set (the same recordings as on Olympia and Warner)? If so be aware that the booklet inadvertently missed out the notes for four of the twenty-seven symphonies due to an oversight. However Alto have now loaded them up (typed out by me - a long story), so if you find the boxed set on their website you can download the missing notes. I'll try to find a link in a moment:

Here they are (yellow link):
https://altocd.com/product/alc3141

PS remember that Svetlanov's very good performance of the epic Symphony No.6 in the boxed set does not feature the optional chorus at the end, which I think is a pity. However, I think that you'll find that you do possess a different performance in your collection, also on Alto, featuring the choir at the end.
8)

Thanks, Jeffrey. I haven't even looked at the booklet yet. This is the set I own:



Ah yes, that recording you sent me. ;) I'll have to give it a listen whenever I decide to dig into Myaskovsky --- I see it's conducted by Kondrashin, so that's very cool. Thanks again for sending me that recording, especially now that I have a different version of the 6th!

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on May 11, 2020, 04:03:26 AM
Thanks, Jeffrey. I haven't even looked at the booklet yet. This is the set I own:



Ah yes, that recording you sent me. ;) I'll have to give it a listen whenever I decide to dig into Myaskovsky --- I see it's conducted by Kondrashin, so that's very cool. Thanks again for sending me that recording, especially now that I have a different version of the 6th!
Yes, that's the new Alto set John. So, now you have a version of Symphony No.6 with and without the choir! The Svetlanov is excellent but the Kondrashin (the earlier of his two recordings of that score) is in a class of its own IMO.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on May 11, 2020, 05:21:38 AM
Yes, that's the new Alto set John. So, now you have a version of Symphony No.6 with and without the choir! The Svetlanov is excellent but the Kondrashin (the earlier of his two recordings of that score) is in a class of its own IMO.

Yeah, Svetlanov is excellent in Myaskovsky, but I imagine that Kondrashin is something else. 8) By the way, what do you think of his Cello Sonatas and the concerti for violin and cello? I have the Violin Concerto in two performances, which I recall the Repin/Gergiev performance was the one I liked the best.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on May 11, 2020, 06:15:39 AM
Yeah, Svetlanov is excellent in Myaskovsky, but I imagine that Kondrashin is something else. 8) By the way, what do you think of his Cello Sonatas and the concerti for violin and cello? I have the Violin Concerto in two performances, which I recall the Repin/Gergiev performance was the one I liked the best.
The Cello Concerto is the first work I ever heard by Miaskovsky - on the radio decades ago. I think that it's great, especially the Rostropovich/Malcolm Sargent recording. I enjoy the Violin Concero as well. It is quite sunny and upbeat with a catchy finale. I like the Feigin/Dmitriev version best (Olympia/Melodiya) probably because it's how I came to know the work in the first place:
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on May 11, 2020, 06:41:42 AM
The Cello Concerto is the first work I ever heard by Miaskovsky - on the radio decades ago. I think that it's great, especially the Rostropovich/Malcolm Sargent recording. I enjoy the Violin Concero as well. It is quite sunny and upbeat with a catchy finale. I like the Feigin/Dmitriev version best (Olympia/Melodiya) probably because it's how I came to know the work in the first place:


Great to hear, Jeffrey. Thanks for the feedback.

J

#567
Agree with Jeffrey that Feigin is top choice for the VC, if you can find it (I think it can be heard on YouTube).  The playing just seems to flow noticeably more naturally than the alternatives, especially in the songful middle (slow) movement.

That Olympia CD (coupled with Svetlanov's Symphony 22) was my very first Myaskovsky encounter, the CD cover of which induces no little nostalgia in me.

As for the Cello Concerto, my preference has long been Lloyd-Webber/M Shostakovich, again, largely for its naturalness and flow (should "natural" be a banned word?).

They don't over interpret the piece, and I like Lloyd-Webber's smooth legato phrasing (not at all bland to my ears).

If you're partial to a lot of fussing and laboring, Feigin & Lloyd Webber aren't the tickets you want for these works, - but did I say how just how smoothly and naturally they flow?

My choices, anyway.

Mirror Image

Quote from: J on May 11, 2020, 10:46:00 AM
Agree with Jeffrey that Feigin is top choice for the VC, if you can find it (I think it can be heard on YouTube).  The playing just seems to flow noticeably more naturally than the alternatives, especially in the songful middle (slow) movement.

That Olympia CD (coupled with Svetlanov's Symphony 22) was my very first Myaskovsky encounter, the CD cover of which induces no little nostalgia in me.

As for the Cello Concerto, my preference has long been Lloyd-Webber/M Shostakovich, again, largely for its naturalness and flow (should "natural" be a banned word?).

They don't over interpret the piece, and I like Lloyd-Webber's smooth legato phrasing (not at all bland to my ears).

If you're partial to a lot of fussing and laboring, Feigin & Lloyd Webber aren't the tickets you want for these works, - but did I say how just how smoothly and naturally they flow?

My choices, anyway.

Very cool. I'll keep these performances in mind. Thanks!

vandermolen

#569
Quote from: J on May 11, 2020, 10:46:00 AM
Agree with Jeffrey that Feigin is top choice for the VC, if you can find it (I think it can be heard on YouTube).  The playing just seems to flow noticeably more naturally than the alternatives, especially in the songful middle (slow) movement.

That Olympia CD (coupled with Svetlanov's Symphony 22) was my very first Myaskovsky encounter, the CD cover of which induces no little nostalgia in me.

As for the Cello Concerto, my preference has long been Lloyd-Webber/M Shostakovich, again, largely for its naturalness and flow (should "natural" be a banned word?).

They don't over interpret the piece, and I like Lloyd-Webber's smooth legato phrasing (not at all bland to my ears).

If you're partial to a lot of fussing and laboring, Feigin & Lloyd Webber aren't the tickets you want for these works, - but did I say how just how smoothly and naturally they flow?

My choices, anyway.
Interesting comments. I liked those original Olympia series 'Socialist Realist'-type CD cover images as well. That particular painting is called 'The Return' (from 1969) by M. Kugach. Presumably a Red Army soldier returning from the war and a good choice for Symphony 22 which is from 1942.

PS that CD is available, second-hand, from Amazon.com for about $20. From Amazon UK it is priced at over £1200  :o
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Here's a fantastic photo of two former classmates chatting:


vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on May 14, 2020, 07:03:59 AM
Here's a fantastic photo of two former classmates chatting:


Lovely! I think that the 20 year old Miaskovsky was in the same class as the 10 year old Prokofiev or something like that. Prokofiev had a reputation for being acerbic and critical and yet he remained remarkably loyal to Miaskovsky throughout his life.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on May 14, 2020, 07:15:17 AM
Lovely! I think that the 20 year old Miaskovsky was in the same class as the 10 year old Prokofiev or something like that. Prokofiev had a reputation for being acerbic and critical and yet he remained remarkably loyal to Miaskovsky throughout his life.

Yes, the best I can remember he was good friends with Myaskovsky. I think the relationship between Prokofiev and Shostakovich, however, was an interesting one. Shostakovich said (or believed to have said) that he thought that Prokofiev never took him seriously as a composer. But this was quoted through Testimony and I can't say if this was accurate or not.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on May 14, 2020, 07:56:47 AM
Yes, the best I can remember he was good friends with Myaskovsky. I think the relationship between Prokofiev and Shostakovich, however, was an interesting one. Shostakovich said (or believed to have said) that he thought that Prokofiev never took him seriously as a composer. But this was quoted through Testimony and I can't say if this was accurate or not.

I know that if a journalist or writer turned up early to interview Prokofiev a hand would appear out of the front door holding a large clock and the door would then be slammed shut.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on May 14, 2020, 08:37:10 AM
I know that if a journalist or writer turned up early to interview Prokofiev a hand would appear out of the front door holding a large clock and the door would then be slammed shut.

:laugh:

Irons

Quote from: vandermolen on May 14, 2020, 08:37:10 AM
I know that if a journalist or writer turned up early to interview Prokofiev a hand would appear out of the front door holding a large clock and the door would then be slammed shut.

That is typical of the man, Jeffrey. Prokofiev and Miaskovsky had a great relationship, one played the role of errant son and the other sensible father. I have told the story before that on a picnic Prokofiev teased Miaskovsky by dropping broken egg shells on the ground and watching Miaskovsky digging a small hole to bury them and not leave a mess. There was no jealousy between them which may (only guessing) not be the case with DSCH.     
You must have a very good opinion of yourself to write a symphony - John Ireland.

I opened the door people rushed through and I was left holding the knob - Bo Diddley.

vandermolen

Quote from: Irons on May 14, 2020, 10:12:07 AM
That is typical of the man, Jeffrey. Prokofiev and Miaskovsky had a great relationship, one played the role of errant son and the other sensible father. I have told the story before that on a picnic Prokofiev teased Miaskovsky by dropping broken egg shells on the ground and watching Miaskovsky digging a small hole to bury them and not leave a mess. There was no jealousy between them which may (only guessing) not be the case with DSCH.     
That's a lovely story and, I imagine, typical of Miaskovsky, who, by all accounts was a very courteous and dignified individual. Yes, you are right about the absence of jealousy in their relationship. Somewhere there is a photo of Prokofiev unveiling a plaque in memory of his old friend in Moscow.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

#577
Just been listening to this fine CD of NYM's piano music, highlights being the Narrante e lugubre central movement of the 'Sonatine' and the noble finale of the 5th Piano Sonata. If you wanted a single CD of Miaskovsky's piano music this is the one that I'd recommend:


And here's the finale of the 5th Piano Sonata, featuring one of NYM's finest tunes (IMO):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l3RDo9O73x8
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on May 26, 2020, 05:39:23 AM
Just been listening to this fine CD of NYM's piano music, highlights being the Narrante e lugubre central movement of the 'Sonatine' and the noble finale of the 5th Piano Sonata. If you wanted a single CD of Miaskovsky's piano music this is the one that I'd recommend:


And here's the finale of the 5th Piano Sonata, featuring one of NYM's finest tunes (IMO):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l3RDo9O73x8

Very nice, Jeffrey. I'll get around to Myaskovsky's piano music at some point I'm sure. I'll probably end up going with the complete set since I'm 'complete' kind of guy. ;)

kyjo

#579
It's a shame that the Taneyev Quartet on Northern Flowers is the only game in town (to my knowledge) for all the Miaskovsky quartets except the 13th. To my ears, they play with a lack of tonal variety and colors that makes the music sound rather dull and lifeless. The Pacifica Quartet's recording of the 13th quartet on Chandos is proof of what a great group can do with this music!
"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music" - Sergei Rachmaninoff