Bruckner vs. Mahler

Started by Sequentia, January 31, 2012, 10:25:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Yum

Bruckner
Mahler
Where the **** is Wagner!

starrynight

Quote from: toucan on February 01, 2012, 05:52:12 PM
Well. in terms of the music & musical influence, certainly. But I was trying to define personality types.
Schubert's lied Das sie hier gewesen is a surprising premonition of Wagner, and Wagner leads to Bruckner who leads to Mahler who leads to Schoenberg: continuity, not conflict, irrespective of our personal preferences.

Why all these versuses? I mean, Haydn v Mozart: were they opposites, enemies? Debussy/Ravel, Stravinsky/Prokofiev, Boulez/Berio?

Brahms vs Wagner: here's an opposition, or Lutoslawski vs Boulez: there's an other one...

Thank you. I agree    8)

Personality types is quite an interesting subject.  I probably don't know enough about Mahler as a person, but I suspect there may not have been another great composer who was quite like Beethoven as a person.

Haydn and Mozart were definitely friends.  Mozart admired what Haydn had achieved and probably the stable life and business acumen he seemed to have.  Mozart was more erratic it seems, a bit of a gambler, maybe more outspoken.  Nearer to Beethoven perhaps.  But Haydn first took Beethoven under his wing when he was still very young and so still felt he had a lot to prove, that wasn't the case with Mozart perhaps. 

Lisztianwagner

Quote from: toucan on February 01, 2012, 05:52:12 PM
Brahms vs Wagner: here's an opposition

That should be incredibly interesting.
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

Mirror Image

Quote from: Lisztianwagner on February 02, 2012, 07:56:09 AM
That should be incredibly interesting.

I'd choose Wagner over Brahms any day of the week.

Lisztianwagner

#43
Quote from: Mirror Image on February 02, 2012, 07:59:01 AM
I'd choose Wagner over Brahms any day of the week.

:)
So would I, althought I love Brahms' music very much.

Out of curiosity , have you ever listened to anything by Brahms, John?
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

Mirror Image

Quote from: Lisztianwagner on February 02, 2012, 08:27:35 AM
:)

Out of curiosity , have ever listened to anything by Brahms, John?

You're joking, right? ???

Opus106

#45
Quote from: Lisztianwagner on February 02, 2012, 08:27:35 AM
Out of curiosity , have ever listened to anything by Brahms, John?

If he hasn't, this poll would have to be deleted. [Edit: Oops! I thought this was in the other poll.]
Regards,
Navneeth

Lisztianwagner

Quote from: Mirror Image on February 02, 2012, 08:59:18 AM
You're joking, right? ???
I understand.

Do you find that music....how can I say....too imitative of the classical style?
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

Mirror Image

Quote from: Lisztianwagner on February 02, 2012, 09:10:49 AM
I understand.

Do you find that music....how can I say....too imitative of the classical style?

No, I think Brahms was an amazing composer, but I find that Wagner's musical language was more advanced and innovative than Brahms. Wagner also has had an emotional hold over me that Brahms does not.

Winky Willy

Bruckner the better man (possibly the best man to compose symphonies), Mahler the greater composer.