No Holds Barred: Your Favorite Orchestrators

Started by Mirror Image, March 13, 2012, 08:06:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Choose four of your favorite orchestrators.

Ravel
10 (27%)
Stravinsky
6 (16.2%)
Debussy
2 (5.4%)
Shostakovich
5 (13.5%)
Prokofiev
5 (13.5%)
R. Strauss
7 (18.9%)
Rimsky-Korsakov
6 (16.2%)
Bartok
2 (5.4%)
Schoenberg
1 (2.7%)
Berg
1 (2.7%)
Webern
2 (5.4%)
Szymanowski
1 (2.7%)
Villa-Lobos
1 (2.7%)
Martinu
0 (0%)
Ligeti
1 (2.7%)
Sibelius
3 (8.1%)
Lutoslawski
1 (2.7%)
Respighi
4 (10.8%)
Britten
1 (2.7%)
Lindberg
0 (0%)
Part
0 (0%)
Falla
0 (0%)
Wagner
6 (16.2%)
Mahler
11 (29.7%)
Honegger
0 (0%)
Berlioz
7 (18.9%)
Other
4 (10.8%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Voting closed: September 29, 2012, 08:06:27 PM

classicalgeek

#20
Quote from: DavidW on April 05, 2012, 12:09:23 PM
My 4 is close to yours classicalgeek... except R Strauss is replaced with Berlioz.

Also an excellent choice - Berlioz was a real pioneer!  The later masters of orchestration (Strauss included) owe a lot to him.

Quote from: classicalgeek on April 05, 2012, 10:55:23 AM
To those I could add, among many others: Bax, Roussel, Korngold, Florent Schmitt, Josef Holbrooke...

To that list, I'll add Enescu and d'Indy...
So much great music, so little time...

Cato

Quote from: Mirror Image on March 13, 2012, 08:06:27 PM
Please choose four favorite orchestrators from this list. I left an option of other just in case I didn't list one of your favorites. 8)

Ods my bodkins!  Bitte, wo ist Herr Anton Bruckner?

Or is he disqualified since organ registration is often the source of how he handles an orchestra?   0:)
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

Mirror Image

Quote from: Cato on April 05, 2012, 12:21:06 PM
Ods my bodkins!  Bitte, wo ist Herr Anton Bruckner?

Or is he disqualified since organ registration is often the source of how he handles an orchestra?   0:)

Usually, when I think of Bruckner, I'm not really thinking about dazzling orchestration. :) There are so many other reasons to enjoy Bruckner.

springrite

Well, I would consider voting Bruckner as one of the best at transcribing works conceived for the organ but transcribed for orchestra. OK, that is orchestration technically but...
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Brian

#24
I voted for Ravel, Rimsky, Lutoslawski, and Berlioz, but in protest of the fact that I couldn't choose Dvorak or Janacek. I like that someone mentioned Roussel, and I love David's suggestion of Mozart, who is indeed worthy of consideration.