from the loins of Johann Sebastian . . .

Started by Scion7, March 16, 2012, 03:55:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which Bach son is your favorite?

C.P.E. Bach
9 (52.9%)
J.C. Bach
2 (11.8%)
W.F. Bach
3 (17.6%)
Arthur Bach (just to see if you're awake)
3 (17.6%)

Total Members Voted: 16

Voting closed: January 11, 2014, 02:55:40 PM

Scion7



Which son's music is closest to your heart, and why?

I have to go with C.P.E. Bach - I have much of J.C.'s music and I love it - but Carl's total output is very impressive.

They (?) say Wilhelm was technically the most talented, and I like what I've heard, but his output was comparatively small, and I don't see it better than CPE or JC's, personally.

Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

mahler10th

lol @ the title of this thread.  Good work!

Luke

WF - the most talented, the most outrageous, the most troubled, the most complex and extreme. A fascinating figure.

kishnevi

Since you said we should vote for Arthur if we were awake, and I'm awake, I voted for Arthur.

Seriously, I can't say I have a favorite among the three.  I'm much more familiar with CPE than WF and JC, but that's mostly happenstance;  in fact, I probably have never heard enough of WF and JC's music to have any real opinion on them at all.

Scion7

There never has been,
nor will there ever be,
a working-class Bach!
Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

mszczuj


Scion7

I don't think he's in the running with his other siblings?

BUT - among the many losses to Germany culturally during WW2 - the loss of museums and historical buildings, rare zoological specimens and Brahms' piano, were many manuscripts of Johann Christoph Friedrich - never published and lost forever.    :(

F*n National Socialism!!!!!!!!!!  >:D >:(
Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'

springrite

Based on the limited choices given, I picked CPE. But where is PDQ???
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

kishnevi

#8
Arthur is in SECOND place?
SECOND?!?!?!?
I voted for him half as a joke, half as way of saying "I don't know enough to have a real opinion". 
Perhaps the other two can 'fess up and explain their votes?

Marc

Here are the rules:

The people who consider Mozart the greatest: vote for J.C.

The people who consider Haydn the greatest: vote for C.P.E.

The people who consider J.S. Bach the greatest: vote for W.F.

The rest of you just vote for Arthur and rattle your jewelry.

Scion7

hmmm... I consider JS Bach a little above Mozart, who in turn is a little above Haydn ...

Yet I picked C.P.E.  . . .

Sits back in chair to ponder the cosmos .....
Saint-Saëns, who predicted to Charles Lecocq in 1901: 'That fellow Ravel seems to me to be destined for a serious future.'