Live vs Studio recordings

Started by dylanesque, March 03, 2013, 10:34:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dylanesque

I was reading a thread and someone stated they preferred the Boulez Live version of Mahler 2nd Symphony rather than the studio version.I purchased the studio version which is fabulous in my opinion but I can't compare to others yet.
My question is again a beginner one. Are studio versions of Symphonies replayed and rerecorded like say the Beatles doing numerous takes or are they done live in one take with the producer making sound better?Also do recordings of live symphonies have applause at the end ever recorded or is it frowned upon?
Regards Darren

AdamFromWashington

Studio recordings are recorded in a studio, with options of multiple takes. Live recordings take place at a concert, and are in one take, excepting possible studio touch up. Studio recordings usually have better sound quality than live recordings, and are more note perfect. Additionally, the interpretation, in comparison to live recordings of the same work, can be more focused on the general architecture of a piece, a "perfect" reading if you will, as opposed to pure excitement. The best live performances are known for their excitement and spontaneity, although there might be audience noise, and flubbed notes. Also, these might not be the most objective performances of works (following tempo and volume indications, etc.) Often times live recordings do leave the audience applause in. I hope that helps answer your questions.

dylanesque

Quote from: Adam of the North(west) on March 05, 2013, 05:10:14 PM
Studio recordings are recorded in a studio, with options of multiple takes. Live recordings take place at a concert, and are in one take, excepting possible studio touch up. Studio recordings usually have better sound quality than live recordings, and are more note perfect. Additionally, the interpretation, in comparison to live recordings of the same work, can be more focused on the general architecture of a piece, a "perfect" reading if you will, as opposed to pure excitement. The best live performances are known for their excitement and spontaneity, although there might be audience noise, and flubbed notes. Also, these might not be the most objective performances of works (following tempo and volume indications, etc.) Often times live recordings do leave the audience applause in. I hope that helps answer your questions.
Many thanks for your well written answer.
Kind Regards
Darren