20th century string quartet cycles

Started by amw, April 04, 2014, 08:17:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pick five

Bartók
29 (60.4%)
Bloch
4 (8.3%)
Britten
6 (12.5%)
Carter
11 (22.9%)
Diamond
2 (4.2%)
Dillon
2 (4.2%)
Ferneyhough
4 (8.3%)
Glass
2 (4.2%)
Haas (G.F.)
0 (0%)
Harvey
1 (2.1%)
Hindemith
4 (8.3%)
Holmboe
0 (0%)
Johnston
2 (4.2%)
Krenek
1 (2.1%)
Maconchy
1 (2.1%)
Martinů
7 (14.6%)
Meyer (K.)
1 (2.1%)
Milhaud
3 (6.3%)
Myaskovsky
4 (8.3%)
Nørgård
0 (0%)
Nørholm
0 (0%)
Nyman
1 (2.1%)
Rochberg
1 (2.1%)
Schnittke
5 (10.4%)
Schoenberg
13 (27.1%)
Shostakovich
22 (45.8%)
Skalkottas
2 (4.2%)
Simpson
3 (6.3%)
Tippett
1 (2.1%)
Villa-Lobos
7 (14.6%)
Weinberg
2 (4.2%)
Zemlinsky
4 (8.3%)
other: __________
8 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 48

EigenUser

Beethoven's Op. 133 -- A fugue so bad that even Beethoven himself called it "Grosse".

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Mirror Image on April 06, 2014, 09:49:47 AM
Cool, DD. I think I already own quite a few performances of the Lyric Suite, but I'll check that one out.

The Arditti's rock on all cylinders, here. Although sadly this recording (whether on the original Montaigne label or the reissue on Naïve) is stuck in OOP limbo. I also have the LaSalle version but it's a distant second choice.

QuoteBTW, what do you think of the arrangement Berg made for string orchestra?

I have Abbado's version with the Vienna PO. No doubt he makes as good a case as can be for the orchestral suite but I think the quicksilver nature of the work comes across better in the original string quartet setting. But as an alternative it's a solid listen.


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

North Star

What about Webern? Opp. 5, 9 & 28, and works without opus numbers, e.g. Langsamer Satz, make up for a total of more than four works for string quartet.
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

North Star

Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on April 06, 2014, 06:24:29 PM
The Arditti's rock on all cylinders, here. Although sadly this recording (whether on the original Montaigne label or the reissue on Naïve) is stuck in OOP limbo. I also have the LaSalle version but it's a distant second choice.

I have Abbado's version with the Vienna PO. No doubt he makes as good a case as can be for the orchestral suite but I think the quicksilver nature of the work comes across better in the original string quartet setting. But as an alternative it's a solid listen.
What is wrong with naïve?? They could have so easily included it here:  ::)

[asin]B00CMSP1IY[/asin]
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: North Star on April 06, 2014, 10:28:39 PM
What is wrong with naïve?? They could have so easily included it here:  ::)

[asin]B00CMSP1IY[/asin]

::) ::) Oh, brother. A disc with 28 minutes of music on it. I feel so wowed. Yeah, to think what could've been included.

Budget price or not that's just a farce. >:(


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

springrite

It is nice to see "other" getting a few votes. I think Toch (among others) wrote quartets that deserves to be heard more.
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

North Star

Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on April 07, 2014, 08:23:58 AM
::) ::) Oh, brother. A disc with 28 minutes of music on it. I feel so wowed. Yeah, to think what could've been included.

Budget price or not that's just a farce. >:(
Indeed - they could have included more on a disc when Schönberg was alive, for crying out loud!
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: North Star on April 07, 2014, 09:28:28 AM
Indeed - they could have included more on a disc when Schönberg was alive, for crying out loud!

:D


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Karl Henning

Quote from: springrite on April 07, 2014, 08:26:07 AM
It is nice to see "other" getting a few votes. I think Toch (among others) wrote quartets that deserves to be heard more.

Thanks for the reminder!
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

vandermolen

Bloch, Miaskovsky and Rubbra get my vote.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

San Antone


The new erato

Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on April 07, 2014, 08:23:58 AM
::) ::) Oh, brother. A disc with 28 minutes of music on it. I feel so wowed. Yeah, to think what could've been included.

Budget price or not that's just a farce. >:(
What do you expect when the label is naive?

EigenUser

Beethoven's Op. 133 -- A fugue so bad that even Beethoven himself called it "Grosse".

Gurn Blanston

Since all my favorite cycles were recorded in the 20th century, I went with the Mosaiques Mozart set.  :)

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

North Star

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on May 01, 2014, 10:19:58 AM
Since all my favorite cycles were recorded in the 20th century, I went with the Mosaiques Mozart set.  :)

8)
* Clicks "Report to moderator" *  8)
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

mn dave

This is mainly a list of stuff I haven't heard...yet.  :)

André

#36
I voted Bartok because it's the first cycle I learned decades ago. But I never listen to them any more. Then Shostakovich, Milhaud, Villa-Lobos and other. The latter would have to be either Daniel Jones or R. Murray Schafer.

I have just purchased 3 discs of Hilding's Rosenberg quartets. I know only of his unnumbered 1942 quartet, a gem if you ask me. Then there are the Vainbergs (Weinberg), a composer I love through his symphonies and concertos.

I also like very much the quartets of Tippett, Britten, Carter...

Among those I don't know and would like to: Schoenberg, Bloch and Diamond

bwv 1080

Bartok, Carter, Ferneyhough, Schnittke, Shostakovich

ritter

Bartók, Carter, Krenek, Milhaud (a recent discovery for me) and Schoenberg...

San Antone

Quote from: ritter on May 04, 2014, 10:40:11 AM
Bartók, Carter, Krenek, Milhaud (a recent discovery for me) and Schoenberg...

Agree on all of these.  Yes, on Milhaud.  I think the quartets contain his best written music.  Krenek, a fantastic composer - and these works are some of my favorites.  I wish Schoenberg had written more. 

Wolfgang Rihm's quartets are worth hearing.  A lot of variety there.  Lachenmann, too.  There is a fairly recent complete set of his quartets.