Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto - the right way

Started by Ciel_Rouge, November 07, 2009, 05:53:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: snyprrr on June 22, 2014, 11:42:28 AM
Kremer or Vengerov?


I've whittled it down to these two. What do you think? Kremer sounds intriguing, even as a First Listen?

If your whittlin' has eliminated Belkin/Ashkenazy, you're doing it wrong  ;)

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Dancing Divertimentian

Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Brian

Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on June 22, 2014, 04:03:55 PM
This one:


(Sporcl)

GREAT choice. Sporcl, Kogan (Brilliant), and Gluzman are my top three for sure. Julia Fischer is great, too. Haven't heard Vengerov, Belkin, or Kremer, though.

snyprrr

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on June 22, 2014, 11:58:09 AM
If your whittlin' has eliminated Belkin/Ashkenazy, you're doing it wrong  ;)

Sarge

Only available reissue w/DSCH1? (great timpani in DSCH passacaglia) yes- they say very nicely presented- but never originally on CD?


Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on June 22, 2014, 04:03:55 PM
This one:




[asin]B00008UEFL[/asin]

Ha, I thought you were making a joke at first- Bruce Springsteen??? Booorn to Play Tchai-ko- ov-sky!! :laugh:


Brian

Quote from: snyprrr on June 22, 2014, 05:39:15 PM
Ha, I thought you were making a joke at first- Bruce Springsteen??? Booorn to Play Tchai-ko- ov-sky!! :laugh:

It's the bomb diggity. Live performances, and amazingly enough, the Dvorak might be even better. 10/10 for sure.

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Brian on June 22, 2014, 05:52:37 PM
It's the bomb diggity. Live performances, and amazingly enough, the Dvorak might be even better. 10/10 for sure.

Ya.


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Brian

Quote from: Dancing Divertimentian on June 22, 2014, 06:11:49 PM
Ya.
OK, I must correct myself. Just listened to the album again, and the Tchaikovsky is the better performance. The Dvorak is very good, but can be bettered by a very special artist (see: Mutter/Honeck), while the Tchaikovsky is simply top-notch, especially the finale, where I don't know anyone better. Helps that Belohlavek draws really detailed, vivid playing from the Czechs. (Love hearing the flute doubling the violin at times.)

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: snyprrr on June 22, 2014, 05:39:15 PM
Ha, I thought you were making a joke at first- Bruce Springsteen??? Booorn to Play Tchai-ko- ov-sky!! :laugh:

If it captures your attention I've done my job! :D



Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Brian on June 22, 2014, 07:41:00 PM
OK, I must correct myself. Just listened to the album again, and the Tchaikovsky is the better performance. The Dvorak is very good, but can be bettered by a very special artist (see: Mutter/Honeck), while the Tchaikovsky is simply top-notch, especially the finale, where I don't know anyone better. Helps that Belohlavek draws really detailed, vivid playing from the Czechs. (Love hearing the flute doubling the violin at times.)

I'm on board. :)


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

Drasko

Quote from: snyprrr on June 22, 2014, 11:42:28 AM
Kremer or Vengerov?


I've whittled it down to these two. What do you think? Kremer sounds intriguing, even as a First Listen?

Kremer.

Vengerov provides some really drop dead gorgeous playing, but what Kremer lacks in tonal department he amply compensates in wit. I find Kremer's choices consistently more interesting. Also, I prefer Maazel's accompaniment. He is both more assertive in tutti and manages to sound more intimate in violin/winds interplay in canzonetta. Abbado for all his customary sensitivity sounds more business as usual here, and Teldec placing soloist firmly in front doesn't help.

Should it be your first listen, or only recording? No idea. I wouldn't be without either, nor without Heifetz, Gitlis, Kogan and Spivakovsky. 

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: snyprrr on June 22, 2014, 05:39:15 PM
Only available reissue w/DSCH1? (great timpani in DSCH passacaglia) yes- they say very nicely presented- but never originally on CD?

It was also reissued by Belart coupled with the Piano Concerto. That's what I have. If you could find a copy it would probably only cost you three cents  ;D




Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

king ubu

Not that big a fan of the concerto, but some versions I like (got to dig up the Kogan box!) include Morini/Rodzinsky, Ferras/Karajan ... regarding Heifetz, I prefer the Barbirolli, I think (but having only recently acquired the big box, there are more versions to explore there!) ... I also need to re-listen to Oistrakh and to Tretiakow (w/Mariss Jansons, as with Kogan, that one can be found in a Brilliant box, and one that is very much worth looking for, in my opinion). Most recent discovery is Shkolnikova/Kondrashin. Only gave this one spin so far, but yeah, that Doremi disc seems to deserve a listen or two as well!

Also, I don't think the Rabin is as bad as this thread makes you believe ... might in fact be the one I've played most often so far (which doesn't mean I like it best).
Es wollt ein meydlein grasen gan:
Fick mich, lieber Peter!
Und do die roten röslein stan:
Fick mich, lieber Peter!
Fick mich mehr, du hast dein ehr.
Kannstu nit, ich wills dich lern.
Fick mich, lieber Peter!

http://ubus-notizen.blogspot.ch/

Brahmsian

Does anyone else like the Ruggiero Ricci, with Fournet conducting the Netherlands Radio Symphony?

snyprrr

Quote from: Drasko on June 23, 2014, 04:14:51 AM
Kremer.

Vengerov provides some really drop dead gorgeous playing, but what Kremer lacks in tonal department he amply compensates in wit. I find Kremer's choices consistently more interesting. Also, I prefer Maazel's accompaniment. He is both more assertive in tutti and manages to sound more intimate in violin/winds interplay in canzonetta. Abbado for all his customary sensitivity sounds more business as usual here, and Teldec placing soloist firmly in front doesn't help.

Should it be your first listen, or only recording? No idea. I wouldn't be without either, nor without Heifetz, Gitlis, Kogan and Spivakovsky.

Yes, I did notice Maazel doing good stuff that apparently other conduxtors just ho-hum at... duuuuuh.... well, I got Vengerov cause he was only 17 cents! haha- but Kremer's only a few bucks.... let's see what the couch says....

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on June 23, 2014, 04:26:34 AM
It was also reissued by Belart coupled with the Piano Concerto. That's what I have. If you could find a copy it would probably only cost you three cents  ;D




Sarge

mmmmmm... don't remember seeing that cover- will check .uk- three cents IS my budget right now!! (seriously, it's hit-or-miss, but a lot of things show up for pennies- and then- poof- they're a thousand dollars!)

I mean, Heifetz was pennies (for his ;Triple Threat') but I just don't want to hear that old sound- haha, it just makes me see Bing Crosby playing the violin, haha- I mean,... I can listen to old records AT NOON- but in the evening I need soundSoundSOUND!

(and, yes, I'm being totally a dikk because I've been listening on a rickety boom-box since I joined here) :-[ :-[ :-[ (Should I have even said that??) :-[ :-[ :-[ petrarch surely won't speak to me now!! :(


oy- how much is TODAY going to cost me????

snyprrr

Quote from: Drasko on June 23, 2014, 04:14:51 AM
Kremer.

Vengerov provides some really drop dead gorgeous playing, but what Kremer lacks in tonal department he amply compensates in wit. I find Kremer's choices consistently more interesting. Also, I prefer Maazel's accompaniment. He is both more assertive in tutti and manages to sound more intimate in violin/winds interplay in canzonetta. Abbado for all his customary sensitivity sounds more business as usual here, and Teldec placing soloist firmly in front doesn't help.

Should it be your first listen, or only recording? No idea. I wouldn't be without either, nor without Heifetz, Gitlis, Kogan and Spivakovsky.

You maaade me get the Kremer, haha! Well, at least I'll have a compare! ;) ok, well Sporcl and Belkin for later, but that's it for me here, whew, by the skin of my teeth!