Sibelius Symphony Showdown: the 4th vs. the 5th

Started by Mirror Image, December 21, 2015, 11:08:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What symphony do you prefer?

Symphony No. 4 in A minor, Op. 63
15 (50%)
Symphony No. 5 in E-flat major, Op. 82
15 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Voting closed: February 04, 2016, 11:08:59 AM

Mirror Image



It's time for an all-out death match! ;D


Lisztianwagner

Two stunning compositions, but my vote is for Symphony No.5.
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

Brian


Brahmsian


Mirror Image

Quote from: ChamberNut on December 21, 2015, 11:39:47 AM
I cannot chose.  :o  Don't be cruel, John.  :P

Hah! For me, the choice was quite simple: the 4th. I do love the 5th a lot, though.

Jo498

Not a big Sibelius nut but the 4th and the 6th are probably my favorites (and the 2nd as "guilty pleasure"); I liked the 5th better in former times, for some reason I am not so fond of it anymore, so I voted 4th.
Tout le malheur des hommes vient d'une seule chose, qui est de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre.
- Blaise Pascal

Mandryka

4th in Autumn and winter; 5th in Spring and Summer.
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen

Sergeant Rock

the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"


Jo498

I might be a philistine but re-listening to the 5th a few times in the last months or so, I found that famous finale quite trite.  >:D The most interesting section for me in the 5th is the first (or first two, depending how one counts) movements.
Tout le malheur des hommes vient d'une seule chose, qui est de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre.
- Blaise Pascal


Elgarian

Voted for 5, but with some misgivings. My admiration for 5 isn't quite what it used to be  (after all these years I still can't listen to the final notes without a sinking 'oh no' feeling, and that dejection has become more ingrained over the decades). Whereas I think my enjoyment of 4, always low thus far, may well be somewhat on the up.

What I really feel is that these aren't the two symphonies I'd have picked myself, for an OK Corral Shootout. But that's rather like the examinee asking the examiner for a set of questions more to his liking.

springrite

Me, always the tie-breaker, though only temporarily...
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Mirror Image

Quote from: Elgarian on December 21, 2015, 12:34:17 PM
Voted for 5, but with some misgivings. My admiration for 5 isn't quite what it used to be  (after all these years I still can't listen to the final notes without a sinking 'oh no' feeling, and that dejection has become more ingrained over the decades). Whereas I think my enjoyment of 4, always low thus far, may well be somewhat on the up.

What I really feel is that these aren't the two symphonies I'd have picked myself, for an OK Corral Shootout. But that's rather like the examinee asking the examiner for a set of questions more to his liking.

One reason I chose the 4th and the 5th, and pitted them against each other, has to with 1. both are polar opposites in overall mood/temperament and 2. while the 5th was a huge success, people were confused by the 4th and, thus, leading to it's relative neglect.

amw

Quote from: Jo498 on December 21, 2015, 12:17:24 PMThe most interesting section for me in the 5th is the first (or first two, depending how one counts) movements.
The most interesting section for me is the last six notes >.>

Elgarian

Quote from: Mirror Image on December 21, 2015, 12:39:15 PM
One reason I chose the 4th and the 5th, and pitted them against each other, has to with 1. both are polar opposites in overall mood/temperament and 2. while the 5th was a huge success, people were confused by the 4th and, thus, leading to it's relative neglect.

Perfectly reasonable, and more sensible than I was being: I was just registering my preferences as being different, which is neither here nor there really.

Elgarian

Quote from: amw on December 21, 2015, 12:41:35 PM
The most interesting section for me is the last six notes >.>

Now there y'go, y'see. Vive la difference!

Brian

Quote from: Mirror Image on December 21, 2015, 12:39:15 PMboth are polar opposites in overall mood/temperament

I think the Fourth Symphony's polar opposite (if it has one, which it may not) is the Third. #4 and #5 share a heroic "questing" quality, and both face many challenges and hardships. Each movement of the Fifth has at least one moment of great pain, uncertainty, and/or anguish, most notably the very Fourth-ish bassoon solo. I think the two symphonies start from a similar place*, but they pursue the material in very different ways and, of course, achieve very different ends. The Fourth begins with mystery, unease, and disquiet, and ends the same way; the Fifth begins with those same things, but mostly overcomes them - or almost overcomes them - or hey, maybe it does overcome them.

*the Fifth Symphony's first movement is expanded from the first movement of the Fourth Symphony, very literally; compare their opening themes, or wait until 4:07-4:15 in this performance, when the French horns foreshadow the Fifth Symphony's main tune.

ZauberdrachenNr.7

Now the 5th vs. the 6th, that decision would have shredded my sensitive sensibilities to the core, TO THEIR VERY CORE! :laugh:

amw

Quote from: Brian on December 21, 2015, 12:50:22 PM
I think the Fourth Symphony's polar opposite (if it has one, which it may not) is the Third.
I don't think any Sibelius symphonies are "opposites" in that sense. The polar opposite of the 4th in overall mood/temperament might be, like, Stravinsky's Symphony in Three Movements or something, but with Sibelius most of his works are outgrowths of similar ideas.