Author Topic: Eric Whitacre  (Read 7595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline c#minor

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 320
Re: Eric Whitacre
« Reply #20 on: April 14, 2009, 10:46:30 PM »
Lux Aurumque is an interesting piece and a bitch to perform and keep in tune. Stretches the range of about every part. I have performed it with mixed chorus and male chorus, the latter was the real challenge.

I don't see how that is possible. Have castrates made a comeback?

Offline Guido

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 3324
  • 396 CCs
Re: Eric Whitacre
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2009, 01:39:38 AM »
Obviously it has been transposed and rearranged... Nowhere near as good in the all male incarnation.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 01:41:37 AM by Guido »

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

Offline DavidRoss

  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 7590
  • Location: Northern California
Re: Eric Whitacre
« Reply #22 on: October 08, 2011, 04:48:31 PM »
I rather like Mr. Whitacre and his music.  This was an interesting experiment:

<a href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win"></a>
"Maybe the problem most of you have ... is that you're not listening to Barbirolli." ~Sarge

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher

Offline knight66

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 10101
  • Location: Edinburgh
Re: Eric Whitacre
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2011, 07:06:51 AM »
That was delightful. I have one of his discs and enjoy the music a good deal. I see that elsewhere on the site he is being trashed and bracketed with Carl Davis.

Whitacre is a good deal more ambitious and is much more interesting harmonically and in the vocal technique he requires.

DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.