Your Top 5 Enescu Works

Started by Mirror Image, March 18, 2019, 08:52:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mirror Image



Enescu would like to know what are your 'Top 5 Favorite Works' of his? I'll post my list later on.

springrite

Oedipe
Octet
Symphonie Concertante for Cello and Orchestra
Cello Sonata, opus 26
Violin Sonata #3

(More or less in that order)
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Mirror Image

Quote from: springrite on March 18, 2019, 08:58:44 PM
Oedipe
Octet
Symphonie Concertante for Cello and Orchestra
Cello Sonata, opus 26
Violin Sonata #3

(More or less in that order)

Very nice list, but which Cello Sonata? He assigned the opus number of 26 to both works with the distinction of 26/1 being the first one and 26/2 being the second one. Interestingly enough, these particular works weren't even published until 1935 (I believe? --- I could have the date wrong).

springrite

Quote from: Mirror Image on March 18, 2019, 09:02:58 PM
Very nice list, but which Cello Sonata? He assigned the opus number of 26 to both works with the distinction of 26/1 being the first one and 26/2 being the second one. Interestingly enough, these particular works weren't even published until 1935 (I believe? --- I could have the date wrong).
The one I have listened to more is the #1.
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

SymphonicAddict

I'm not terribly familiar with Enescu, but I do enjoy some works of his such as:

Octet
Study Symphony No. 1
Study Symphony No. 4
Violin sonata No. 3
Romanian Rhapsodies Op. 11

I remember liking the proper symphonies, but I don't have strong memories from them, so I don't include them.

ritter

#5
My two cents worth... :)

Ordered by opus number:
String Quartet No. 2, op. 22/2
Oedipe, op. 23
Piano Sonata No. 3, op. 24/3
Piano Quintet op. 29
Chamber Symphony op. 33

Honourable mention: Orchestral Suite No. 3, "Villageoise", op. 27

All these pieces are post-1930...it's clear it's the "mature" Enesco that I really admire...

Daverz

#6
Romanian Rhapsodies (I'll pick No. 2 because it's less played)
Symphony No. 1 (particularly fond of this one)
Symphony No. 3
Violin Sonata No. 3
Suite No. 3

Jo498

for now only two, it's been a while that I listened to symphonies, suites or chamber music and I can't claim to know his music well although I probably have heard most of the better known instrumental pieces at some stage.

Dixtuor, one the most attraktive works for somewhat larger sized woodwind ensemble
3rd violin sonata

Tout le malheur des hommes vient d'une seule chose, qui est de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre.
- Blaise Pascal

amw

Piano sonata no.3
Decet
Chamber Symphony
Impressions d'enfance
Violin sonata no.3

off the top of my head

Mirror Image

Quote from: ritter on March 18, 2019, 11:54:49 PM
My two cents worth... :)

Ordered by opus number:
String Quartet No. 2, op. 22/2
Oedipe, op. 23
Piano Sonata No. 3, op. 24/3
Piano Quintet op. 29
Chamber Symphony op. 33

Honourable mention: Orchestral Suite No. 3, "Villageoise", op. 27

All these pieces are post-1930...it's clear it's the "mature" Enesco that I really admire...

Great list, Rafael. 8) I knew I could count on you. The only work on your list that I don't really enjoy is String Quartet No. 2, Op. 22/2 and this is mainly because I find it's musical language to be acerbic and harsh in a way that it makes the music unappealing to me. There's just no access points, but, IIRC, the last movement was quite good.

Mirror Image


Mirror Image

#11
I suppose it's time for me to make a list (in no particular order):

Cello Sonata in C major, Op. 26/2
Oedipe, Op. 23
Piano Suite No. 3, "Pièces impromptues", Op. 18
Piano Quintet in A minor, Op. 29
Vox maris, Op. 31


*List is subject to change as there are many other works that I could put in a 'Top 5', but right now, I feel these current choices best reflect my taste.

ritter

#12
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 19, 2019, 06:17:39 AM
Great list, Rafael. 8) I knew I could count on you. The only work on your list that I don't really enjoy is String Quartet No. 2, Op. 22/2 and this is mainly because I find it's musical language to be acerbic and harsh in a way that it makes the music unappealing to me. There's just no access points, but, IIRC, the last movement was quite good.
Yes, that 2nd SQ is quite lean and ascetic, and that may be part of its appeal to me. But what I really admire in this piece is something that many would regard as a minor issue, but for me is simply magical: at the end of the third movement, the quartet repeatedly plays a 5 note theme, in a way that appears devoid of direction and is "transitional". Then, this same theme becomes the main material of the con moto initial section of the final movement. It's this transition that I find breathtaking.

Enescu does a similar thing in the Piano Quintet, with a rising crescendo, in which the piano plays these almost abstract meandering figures, and which leads into the last section of the piece, where the theme that's only hesitantly appeared in the  transition that has preceded it is now stated triumphantly.

Other composers have done similar things (these transitions, I mean), and they are for me highlights of their respective works. The first example of course is the transition between the last two movements of Beethoven's  Fifth. There's also a small orchestral passsage in the fourth scene of Wagner's Rheingold (after Wotan's "Gönn ihm die geifernde Lust" and before Loge's "Fasolt und Fafner nahen von fern"), IMHO clearly inspired by Beethoven. And then,  Debussy was a master at this: the transition between the Danse sacrée and the Danse profane, and, of course, the segment connecting "Les parfums de la nuit" and "Le matin d'un jour de fête" in Ibéria. Boulez's Pli selon pli also has several moments like this.

It's as if the music suddenly found itself in a sort of no man's land, became static, and lost any sense of space and time...I can't describe it better.

Mirror Image

Quote from: ritter on March 19, 2019, 11:53:22 AM
Yes, that 2nd SQ is quite lean and ascetic, and that may be part of its appeal to me. But what I really admire in this piece is something that many would regard as a minor issue, but for me is simply magical: at the end of the third movement, the quartet repeatedly plays a 5 note theme, in a way that appears devoid of direction and is "transitional". Then, this same theme becomes the main material of the con moto initial section of the final movement. It's this transition that I find breathtaking.

Enescu does a similar thing in the Piano Quintet, with a rising crescendo, in which the piano plays these almost abstract meandering figures, and which leads into the last section of the piece, where the theme that's only hesitantly appeared in the  transition that has preceded it is now stated triumphantly.

Other composers have done similar things (these transitions, I mean), and they are for me highlights of their respective works. The first example of course is the transition between the last two movements of Beethoven's  Fifth. There's also a small orchestral passsage in the fourth scene of Wagner's Rheingold (after Wotan's "Gönn ihm die geifernde Lust" and before Loge's "Fasolt und Fafner nahen von fern"), IMHO clearly inspired by Beethoven. And then,  Debussy was a master at this: the transition between the Danse sacrée and the Danse profane, and, of course, the segment connecting "Les parfums de la nuit" and "Le matin d'un jour de fête" in Ibéria. Boulez's Pli selon pli also has several moments like this.

It's as if the music suddenly found itself in a sort of no man's land, became static, and lost any sense of space and time...I can't describe it better.

Thanks for the feedback here, Rafael. I'll have to listen out for this.

Mirror Image

I'm surprised there's not that many replies in this thread. Well, I guess I shouldn't be too surprised as Enescu's music does take a bit of effort to get into, but, of course, I could just be talking about myself here.

springrite

Quote from: Mirror Image on March 20, 2019, 06:59:17 AM
I'm surprised there's not that many replies in this thread. Well, I guess I shouldn't be too surprised as Enescu's music does take a bit of effort to get into, but, of course, I could just be talking about myself here.
There is a good chance that many people haven't listened to more than five.
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Mirror Image

Quote from: springrite on March 20, 2019, 05:33:55 PM
There is a good chance that many people haven't listened to more than five.

Yes, indeed. His oeuvre isn't too large, but it's worth the effort getting familiar with his music, IMHO.

kyjo

#17
It's undoubtedly these works:

Nocturne in D-flat major for piano (a substantial work at c. 17 min. long, btw)
Orchestral Suite No. 3 in D major Villageoise
String Octet in C major
Piano Quartet No. 1 in D major
Symphony No. 3 in C major


...and an honorable mention to the irrepressibly fun and catchy Romanian Rhapsody No. 1 which doesn't deserve to overshadow the rest of his sizable output! ;)
"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music" - Sergei Rachmaninoff

DavidW

My favorite work is the octet.

Florestan

Quote from: kyjo on May 22, 2024, 07:50:03 AMan honorable mention to the irrepressibly fun and catchy Romanian Rhapsody No. 1 which doesn't deserve to overshadow the rest of his sizable output! ;)

The Second Rhapsody, with its ballade-like, reflective atmosphere makes for a perfect counterpart to the First. It's much less known and played and it's a real pity because it's as perfectly crafted and highly expressive as the First.
"Beauty must appeal to the senses, must provide us with immediate enjoyment, must impress us or insinuate itself into us without any effort on our part." - Claude Debussy