Post your paintings

[Saul]

Be grateful.

You are silly.

[Larry Rinkel]

You are silly.

Well, someone has to be. 

[Saul]

Either way, they're a beautiful pair.

HAHA!!

yes they are!

[Saul]

Well, someone has to be. 

But that someone needs to give others a chance as well.
be fair man...

[Mark]

Hey! This is fun!

Here's one I did - I call it, 'Stained Glass'.

[Novi]

Name one.

Duchamp's Fountain?

At least, I guess it didn't take him very long. Someone down at the bog factory probably laboured long and hard though ...

[SonicMan46]

Saul -many of the 'images' that you show are certainly attractive & enjoyable, but I'm presuming that they are generated completely w/ computer-manipulated graphics - not objecting - this may be the future of art (unfortunately, IMO) - 

In any of these images that you present, did you actually take a 'brush' in hand and paint a 'wet liquid' on a canvas, or did you do some original print media (e.g. lithograph, etching, etc.) - if not, then you are producing 'computer-generated' art - not a great achivevement - but hey, I'm 'old fashion' - 

[Saul]

Saul -many of the 'images' that you show are certainly attractive & enjoyable, but I'm presuming that they are generated completely w/ computer-manipulated graphics - not objecting - this may be the future of art (unfortunately, IMO) - 

In any of these images that you present, did you actually take a 'brush' in hand and paint a 'wet liquid' on a canvas, or did you do some original print media (e.g. lithograph, etching, etc.) - if not, then you are producing 'computer-generated' art - not a great achivevement - but hey, I'm 'old fashion' - 

The software gives me the tools to create these paintings, but I'm doing the paintings.
Sort of like the finale for composition. Gives you all the things you need to compose but you still need to do the "composing".

[Saul]

By the way Saul, my comments are not personal attacks, but constructive criticism. If you can't handle comments aimed at improving your art, perhaps you're better off doing something that doesn't warrant any feedback, like becoming a meter-reader.

You began by asking "how long it took you to create these paintings?".
You were looking to build on some crack or a hole in order to get a hill to start your "constructive criticism". I also didn't like the tone that you used , certinly, I didn't get the impression that you were trying to assist me in creating "better" art.

You couldn't just look at the art that I presented here and judge it for what it was right there and that same moment that you viewed it? No.. you decided to build on some crack and ask questions so you could have a ramp to begin your "critic"...
Not an original move on your part Corey.

[Saul]

I asked because it was pretty obvious right away that you spent very little time making them. They have very little depth or detail and seem pretty flat. It seems to me that you are using abstraction as a means to mask your sloppy work ethic, but go on doing what you do. Obviously you feel you are beyond criticism. That's all I'm going to say.

Im not using anything to mask anything.
Youre dreaming.

[Saul]

The Island

Took about 6 hours to create:

[Saul]

Universal

[Saul]

Sagittarius

[Saul]

The Hidden Mountains

[Hector]

Fer Chrissakes somebody tell this guy that this ain't 'Art.'

Computer daubs.

Sad, really.

[Saul]

Fer Chrissakes somebody tell this guy that this ain't 'Art.'

Computer daubs.

Sad, really.

Get a hold of yourself , Hector...

[Guido]

Why can I only see the last one?

[Saul]

Why can I only see the last one?

I dont know..

[Saul]

Latest painting

Lightning

[маразм1]

(c) Vishhh