Last Movie You Watched

[DavidW]

I watched a silly comedy about Y2K, resulting in AI robots trying to enslave humanity.

[Number Six]

On Swift Horses

Saw this one last night at the cinema. Admitted, I went for Daisy Edgar-Jones - but the whole cast were terrific and almost across-the-board stunningly gorgeous ("almost" depends on what you think of Will Poulter and his creepy eyebrows  ).

It's a story about queerness and the American Dream in post Korean War America. Beautifully shot and costumed and acted. It gets a little messy at times, not sure if it's a Sirk melodrama or a film noir about gambling in Vegas. But I liked it very much and will maybe go again tomorrow.

[Number Six]

I also saw Pride & Prejudice the other day at the cinema - the 2005 Keira Knightley version.

I have seen it a zillion times, and it never gets old. Thrilled to see it again on the big screen. Might to make a double feature of it and On Swift Horses tomorrow at AMC.

[AnotherSpin]

The Alto Knights — it started with some hope, honestly. The opening had a few promising moments that hinted at a decent old-school mob story. But as the film went on, it just got bogged down in exposition and lost any momentum it had. The pacing dragged, the storytelling felt lazy, and by the time it reached the final act, I was fully checked out. De Niro's double role could've been interesting, but it ended up more distracting than effective, and it doesn't add anything meaningful. The finale sealed it for me: a clear disappointment that left no doubt this was a misfire.

[Karl Henning]

The commentary upon The Last Temptation of Christ, with Scorsese, Dafoe and screenwriter Jn Schrader. Highly interesting and informative. 

[Florestan]

I quite liked Pope Benedict XVI and I'm glad to see that my intuition was correct: under the apparent coolness and aloofness of an intellectual and a scholar there was a friendly and warm human being, no stranger to humor and tenderness. Pope Francis, which I liked too, was very different from him, more directly humane and instantly likeable, but I see them as complementary, not contradictory. I hope the next pope will be just as good as these two were.

[Cato]

In recent days...





One of our favorites: Mrs. Cato's best friend had never seen it, and she was very taken by it.


It is hard to believe that 28 years have gone by, since the movie came out.


Also...




My mother and I saw this in the theater in 1962: an adolescent at the time, I knew nothing about Busby Berkeley, but later, looking at the sequences in Jumbo which he choreographed, his style is obvious!

Doris Day was 40 at the time, but still sunny enough to charm Stephen Boyd.  Jimmy Durante and Martha Raye remained as funny and poignant as ever.

Called a movie which appeared 30 years beyond its time, in the rock-'n'-roll 1960's it probably was an anachronism, but I liked it!

The main song: The Most Beautiful Girl in the World.  Apparently Stephen Boyd's singing was dubbed, despite his quite fine Irish baritone.  The same thing happened with Audrey Hepburn in My Fair Lady around the same time.

[relm1]

I saw "A Complete Unknown" yesterday.  I enjoyed it but felt it was very broadbrush exploration of Bob Dylan and his 1960's career.  Was he ever as famous as they make him out here?  I thought he was always a niche because there were some huge megastars at that time in history (Beetles, Elvis, The Supremes, James Brown, etc.) but I'm not an expert in pop music.  I thought the story overall was well told, just too many reaction shots of fans acting like they are witnessing history being made that will one day be in a biopic.  Timothee Chalamet really embodies and becomes each role.  I loved the Dylan/Baez team up and how their tension was portrayed. 

My question to those who lived through the 1960's, how impactful was Dylan at that time?  I always thought he was a slow burn who never had a massive reach but again, I'm not so knowledgeable about this type of music.

[Madiel]

My question to those who lived through the 1960's, how impactful was Dylan at that time?  I always thought he was a slow burn who never had a massive reach but again, I'm not so knowledgeable about this type of music.

One does not have to have lived through the 1960s. One only has to read the Wikipedia article on Dylan to see that he was selling records and having chart success. The discography, too, shows a number of singles and albums making the top 10 on the charts.

[Karl Henning]

One does not have to have lived through the 1960s. One only has to read the Wikipedia article on Dylan to see that he was selling records and having chart success. The discography, too, shows a number of singles and albums making the top 10 on the charts.

And always an outsized influence on his peers.

[Cato]

I saw "A Complete Unknown" yesterday....

My question to those who lived through the 1960's, how impactful was Dylan at that time?  I always thought he was a slow burn who never had a massive reach but again, I'm not so knowledgeable about this type of music.

I was not very attentive to popular music back then, as I had been much more thrilled - starting in the mid-1950's - by the great Classical Music composers (from Gabrieli and Gesualdo through Beethoven and Bruckner to Schoenberg and Stravinsky).

However, yes, your impression was my impression 60 years ago.  From what I could tell among my Ohio contacts then, Bob Dylan's talent-challenged, drug-addled mumbling was a niche market, albeit a financially successful one for him.

I will not claim to understand the fuss about him then or afterward.

That he received a Nobel Prize for Literature (of all things) condemns the taste and judgment of the people in charge of it today.

"Well, ah woul' nah' feel so all alone'
Evvver'bah-ee mus' ge' stone' " 

Similar to the fuss about Jimi Hendrix, I recall one of my contemporaries raving about him, while playing one of his records and asking my opinion.

"He really has something there!" said my acquaintance.

As politely as possible, I said: "Well, not really: from what I hear, he uses basic major and minor chords, like everyone else in rock-'n'-roll."   

Of interest was the claim back then of how "radical" and "new" the music of (insert '60's rock group or singer here) was supposed to be.

In fact, the radical music had already been occurring in Classical Music since the beginning of the century:  compare Karl Amadeus Hartmann's Symphony #6 or Schoenberg's Violin Concerto or Alois Haba's The Mother to anything produced by (insert '60's rock group or singer here).

[Karl Henning]

@Cato Strooth, the bestowal of the Nobel Prize in Lit was a (shall we say) cultural curiosity. 

[Florestan]

That he received a Nobel Prize for Literature (of all things) condemns the taste and judgment of the people in charge of it today.

@Cato Strooth, the bestowal of the Nobel Prize in Lit was a (shall we say) cultural curiosity.

It's been discussed here back then.

https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,26301.0.html

[Cato]

@Cato Strooth, the bestowal of the Nobel Prize in Lit was a (shall we say) cultural curiosity.

Aye, and a more polite phrasing would be hard to imagine! 

It's been discussed here back then.

https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,26301.0.html

Thanks for the link!

[Mandryka]

It's really Iliad -like at times -- sort of Homer with Plato's Republic plopped in the middle, between two armies ready to fight.  It makes me wonder whether I should have a go at reading it. There's what looks like an authoritative translation into English from Chicago University Press.

[Madiel]

It's been discussed here back then.

https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,26301.0.html

My favourite bit of the first page is where someone, apparently without a trace of irony, says the Nobel committee needs to stop having a bias against genre fiction.

In the midst of people losing it because the Nobel committee just went and awarded a genre storyteller.

[Karl Henning]

It's been discussed here back then.

https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,26301.0.html

Thanks, Andrei. I suppose there's the odd chance that I chimed in then, as well. I ought to investigate. 

[Florestan]

Thanks, Andrei. I suppose there's the odd chance that I chimed in then, as well. I ought to investigate.

You did --- and so did I. 

[JBS]

It's really Iliad -like at times -- sort of Homer with Plato's Republic plopped in the middle, between two armies ready to fight.  It makes me wonder whether I should have a go at reading it. There's what looks like an authoritative translation into English from Chicago University Press.

Is this it?
Amazon says it's 5933 pages. I think it's a set of ten volumes.


I'd suggest the Ramayana first, both for length (a mere 960 pages) and the storyline is much more akin to the Trojan War.

[Mandryka]

Is this it?
Amazon says it's 5933 pages. I think it's a set of ten volumes.


I'd suggest the Ramayana first, both for length (a mere 960 pages) and the storyline is much more akin to the Trojan War.

No, this is one of the volumes of the Chicago edition - I quite like the idea of its being in multiple volumes.


https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo238499996.html

I quite fancy the Book of Women


The Book of the Women, which movingly portrayed the grief of the wives, mothers, and sisters of the many warriors slain in the epic's central war narrative. The crises of grief presented in The Book of the Women give particular poignancy and depth to the shanti, or pacification, that is the theme of Book 12


Isn't the Ramayana about monkeys? A friend of mine's son went to a school with a lot of Hindus and one year, instead of a nativity play, they put on a Ramayana show. I remember the 7 year old singing me a song about the monkey king!