Pieces that are too long?

Started by dtwilbanks, September 17, 2007, 08:57:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Grazioso on September 18, 2007, 04:17:07 AM
Suk's Fantastic Scherzo, a piece I adore but have always thought could be shaved by a minute or two to excise unnecessary repetition. As delightful as the themes are, they just don't warrant that much time. The same could be said for most of Bruckner's scherzi.

I don't agree...nor do most critics and musicologists. The consensus is: Bruckner was incapable of writing a weak scherzo.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Keemun

Quote from: val on September 18, 2007, 01:13:17 AM

Some pieces that I think that are too long:

* * *

MAHLER: . . . 2nd Symphony (after the Urlicht)


:o  I disagree, the fifth movement is wonderful.   
Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. - Ludwig van Beethoven

Mark

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on September 18, 2007, 05:39:29 AM
I don't agree...nor do most critics and musicologists. The consensus is: Bruckner was incapable of writing a weak scherzo.

Sarge

Looks like I'm gonna go against the grain here, too, Sarge - love Bruckner, but those Scherzi ...

Sergeant Rock

#43
Quote from: Larry Rinkel on September 18, 2007, 03:17:07 AM
I'm going to dig out something I wrote a year or more ago on the previous version of this board....

You beat me to the punch, Larry, and in far superior style than I could muster. My basic point being: each time the narrative is repeated, it's from a different character or characters' perspective and we gain further insight into and knowledge about the action and consequences of the action. To criticize Wagner because he didn't write fast-paced, crowd pleasing theatrical drama like Verdi and Puccini is to miss the point of his epics. It's as nonsensical as criticizing Dante or Cervantes because The Divine Comedy isn't a sonnet or Don Quixote a short story.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Mark on September 18, 2007, 05:49:15 AM
Looks like I'm gonna go against the grain here, too, Sarge - love Bruckner, but those Scherzi ...

You're weird, Mark.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Mark


Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Mark on September 18, 2007, 05:51:18 AM
I know. Makes for an interesting life. ;D

Makes for an interesting forum anyway  ;)

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

MDL

Quote from: Keemun on September 18, 2007, 05:46:36 AM
:o  I disagree, the fifth movement is wonderful.   

Yes, quite! The last movement is enthralling.

Florestan

Bad editors: Mahler, Wagner (  ;D )
Excellent editors: Mozart, Haydn, Chopin, Brahms, Hugo Wolf
"Beauty must appeal to the senses, must provide us with immediate enjoyment, must impress us or insinuate itself into us without any effort on our part. ." — Claude Debussy

Lethevich

Re. Bruckner - the scherzos work well IMO, and the repetition is very deliberate (like in the adagios). When played by a powerful orchestra, each repetition builds up such a feeling of momentum and gravity.
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

Mark

Quote from: Lethe on September 18, 2007, 07:04:02 AM
Re. Bruckner - the scherzos work well IMO, and the repetition is very deliberate (like in the adagios). When played by a powerful orchestra, each repetition builds up such a feeling of momentum and gravity.

Hmm ... not sure I'd agree here about the repetitions in some of Bruckner's work. I seem to recall recently becoming quite annoyed with them in one of his symphonies, though which one I don't remember. Possibly the performance was at fault.

m_gigena

Quote from: val on September 18, 2007, 01:13:17 AM

SCHUMANN: 4th movement of the first piano Sonata


I may agree. But only because I love the coda and I can't wait to listen to it.

Mr Bloom

Most of Shostakovich's symphonies.

knight66

Quote from: Larry Rinkel on September 17, 2007, 08:16:46 PM
Tell me exactly what you'd cut.

I know we got into this territory with Mahler, but people would not specify what they did not like. I also would welcome cuts in Wagner. I would have quite a bit of Siegfried scissored, especially act 1...all the endless winging and act 2. Even the love duet at the end seems overextended. Of course, I know he was a genius, he wrote exactly what he wanted, but for me, sitting in the theatre, I find my circulation in danger and my bum numb.

I was at a concert performance of Meistersingers last year and there were long passages in act 1 and act 2 where I ached for things to move on. Wagner can drive me nuts with the double repetition of the exposition. Sometimes I think he felt the audience was thick that it needed to be told so much three times.

I know it is symphonic and that it is through written and each section relates to earlier and later sections. I know it is sacrilege, I am not suggesting it always be performed with heavy cuts....just when I am around.

Conversely, I would leave Walkure, Gotterdammerung and Tristan severely alone, so I am not a total philistine, just a part time one.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

marvinbrown

#54
Quote from: knight on September 18, 2007, 01:42:02 PM
I know we got into this territory with Mahler, but people would not specify what they did not like. I also would welcome cuts in Wagner. I would have quite a bit of Siegfried scissored, especially act 1...all the endless winging and act 2. Even the love duet at the end seems overextended. Of course, I know he was a genius, he wrote exactly what he wanted, but for me, sitting in the theatre, I find my circulation in danger and my bum numb.

Mike

  My heart aches as I am reading this......... Siegfried Act 1 is a high point for me, Fafner's leitmotif, the steel forging scene, the three question exchange between Mime and Wotan disguised as the Wanderer, Siegfried's realization that he is not of Mime's kind, oh dear lots of very fine moments.  Mike,  I play Act 1 of Siegfried more than any other, and Solti's recording is filled with excitement and power.........   I guess I stand alone here  :'( !

  marvin 

knight66

You see....I am not surprised; so, it is only when I am around that they need to retain the high points and flood the plains around them.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

val

QuoteMark

Looks like I'm gonna go against the grain here, too, Sarge - love Bruckner, but those Scherzi ...

To me, the Scherzi of the 2nd and 9th Symphonies are perhaps the most beautiful ever composed. Please Mark, listen to the Scherzo of the 2nd conducted by Chailly or the Scherzo of the 9th with Furtwängler or Van Beinum. It is extraordinary music.
Perhaps you are thinking about the Scherzi of the 6th, 7th or 8th: I agree with you that they seem a little pale compared to the other movements.

Mark

Quote from: val on September 19, 2007, 12:39:04 AM
To me, the Scherzi of the 2nd and 9th Symphonies are perhaps the most beautiful ever composed. Please Mark, listen to the Scherzo of the 2nd conducted by Chailly or the Scherzo of the 9th with Furtwängler or Van Beinum. It is extraordinary music.
Perhaps you are thinking about the Scherzi of the 6th, 7th or 8th: I agree with you that they seem a little pale compared to the other movements.

Thanks, Val. I think it was the Fifth or Eighth Symphony's scherzo which grated on me. Will have to listen anew. ;)