Haydn's Haus

[Papy Oli]

This is crazy, I can reply but cannot quote Brian's 13107, even with copy/paste to an editor...
Neither just pasting some stuff of myself from an editor and it doesn't work with (quick)/edit either.

Just in case it helps, did you log off and log back on after the update, just to clear your connection?

[Jo498]

No, I didn't. And I don't really want to not to risk not being able to log in again. As you see, I can post.

[Jo498]

Get the Petersen (Capriccio) for op. 1.
I am not aware of a separate op. 2, probably Auryn is the best choice here.
op. 9 and 17 are really quite good, they were written only 2 years or so before op. 20. I have not heard the Leipzig (if they recorded all of 9 and 17) but Buchberger, Auryn, Festetics would all be solid options and are available as twofers.

I think you need another op. 33 even though I am at a loss what to recommend as I don't really love any of 6+ recordings I have heard without reservations. But the Auryn are a bit lame in some, especially my great favorite op.33 #3 (that is fortunately well covered in separate anthologies such as by the Jerusalem or Smetana quartets). The Apponyi (= Freiburger Barockorchester principals) is strongly characterized but rather angular and aggressive sounding HIP at times. The Cuarteto Casals is razor sharp and fast but lacking a bit of charm, maybe the Parkanyi (but I have only one half with them)?

Also another op. 54. If the Juilliard is downloadable (otherwise box or LP), get this, or maybe the fairly recent Sacconi.

op. 77 is well covered, Mosaiques are at their best here, for HIP, also ABQ very stylish in a traditional way (probably better than their op. 76).

[Jo498]

Well, something in your reply upsets the system. It could literally be a single bit of punctuation. You just have to find the piece of punctuation.

Maybe, and in fact cutting out the quote from Brian and putting some spaces within "op. 77" and similar strings seems to have solved the problem for now.