Eduard Tubin (1905-82)

Started by vandermolen, March 02, 2008, 01:52:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Karl Henning

By seeming chance, the first I heard is your favorite, the Fifth; and I like it very well.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

vandermolen

Am I alone in liking No.1?

My favourites in order: 2,3,4,(1 + 5)10,6,7,8,9.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Sergeant Rock

the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Mirror Image

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on January 26, 2016, 12:57:47 PM
I think John (MI) likes it too.

Sarge

I like the first movement, but that's about it. The rest of the symphony just kind of falls apart for me with the two proceeding movements.

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 26, 2016, 06:35:10 PM
I like the first movement, but that's about it. The rest of the symphony just kind of falls apart for me with the two proceeding movements.

I was thinking this when I made my comment:

Quote from: Mirror Image on February 23, 2015, 04:21:03 PM
I think Tubin's 1st and 7th stand out the most to me. That first movement of the 1st is a miniature masterpiece.

Not that your new post contradicts it; merely clarifies it.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

J

The first movement of the 1rst stands out for being really good, - and the second and third movements stand out for being really bad. 

Got it.

Mirror Image

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on January 27, 2016, 07:10:53 AM
I was thinking this when I made my comment:

Not that your new post contradicts it; merely clarifies it.

Sarge

Thanks for the clarification, Sarge. ;)

Mirror Image

First post in almost a year! :o I shouldn't be surprised really. Anyway, I've been going through Tubin's symphonies again and finding a lot of enjoyment in them. I've been contemplating getting Volmer's series on Alba, but I continue to read conflicting reports that he's not as inspired as Jarvi regardless of how much detail Volmer brings to the music. It would be nice to hear another interpretation of these works however. Anyone have some good experiences with Volmer's cycle on Alba?

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 04, 2017, 06:48:41 AMAnyone have some good experiences with Volmer's cycle on Alba?

I have Vomer's 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11. The only one I've directly compared to Järvi is the Fourth, and it blows Järvi away: much better recording with lots of detail, a better orchestra.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 04, 2017, 06:48:41 AM
First post in almost a year! :o I shouldn't be surprised really. Anyway, I've been going through Tubin's symphonies again and finding a lot of enjoyment in them. I've been contemplating getting Volmer's series on Alba, but I continue to read conflicting reports that he's not as inspired as Jarvi regardless of how much detail Volmer brings to the music. It would be nice to hear another interpretation of these works however. Anyone have some good experiences with Volmer's cycle on Alba?
I have both complete cycles ( ::)). I wouldn't want to be without the Jarvi set but the more recent Volmer cycle complements it. If I had to choose I would stick with the Jarvi and I prefer his interpretation of Symphony 4, especially the beautiful opening - recorded I think at a live concert possibly in Tubin's presence. Symphonies 1-5 and 10 are my favourites
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on January 04, 2017, 07:45:23 AMI have both complete cycles ( ::)). I wouldn't want to be without the Jarvi set but the more recent Volmer cycle complements it. If I had to choose I would stick with the Jarvi and I prefer his interpretation of Symphony 4, especially the beautiful opening - recorded I think at a live concert possibly in Tubin's presence. Symphonies 1-5 and 10 are my favourites

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on January 04, 2017, 07:33:32 AM
I have Vomer's 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11. The only one I've directly compared to Järvi is the Fourth, and it blows Järvi away: much better recording with lots of detail, a better orchestra.

Sarge

Thanks guys. I just ordered Volmer's complete Tubin cycle and I'm going to do my best to try and enjoy these performances on their own merits and not give in to those people who say that Volmer lacks this or that whereas Jarvi reigns supreme. It is highly possible that many people are still attached to Jarvi's Tubin for the fact that it was their first exposure to the composer. Don't get me wrong, Jarvi is amazing in this music, but sometimes I feel he pushes the music a bit too hard in some sections where a bit more lyricism would be preferred.

Madiel

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on January 04, 2017, 07:33:32 AM
The only one I've directly compared to Järvi is the Fourth, and it blows Järvi away: much better recording with lots of detail, a better orchestra.

I seem to remember that's the one where Classics Today considered Järvi to be weak.

I'm sticking with him as I try all the symphonies out via streaming, but I know both sets are available on the streaming service I use (Deezer).
Nobody has to apologise for using their brain.

Mirror Image

Quote from: ørfeo on January 04, 2017, 11:43:32 AM
I seem to remember that's the one where Classics Today considered Järvi to be weak.

I'm sticking with him as I try all the symphonies out via streaming, but I know both sets are available on the streaming service I use (Deezer).

Whenever you can form some kind of opinion, I'd love to know what you think of the Volmer Tubin series. I'll go ahead and say his recording of the ballet Kratt is top-notch. There's also an excellent performance of Sinfonietta on Estonian Motifs that's coupled with Kratt.

Mirror Image

I'm not sure if anyone has posted this particular blog before, but it's quite well-written and helps shed some light on Tubin's symphonies:

https://orthosphere.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/eduard-tubin-symphonist/

Madiel

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 04, 2017, 07:26:01 PM
Whenever you can form some kind of opinion, I'd love to know what you think of the Volmer Tubin series. I'll go ahead and say his recording of the ballet Kratt is top-notch. There's also an excellent performance of Sinfonietta on Estonian Motifs that's coupled with Kratt.

Right. See you in 10 years.
Nobody has to apologise for using their brain.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 04, 2017, 08:03:40 AM
Thanks guys. I just ordered Volmer's complete Tubin cycle and I'm going to do my best to try and enjoy these performances on their own merits and not give in to those people who say that Volmer lacks this or that whereas Jarvi reigns supreme. It is highly possible that many people are still attached to Jarvi's Tubin for the fact that it was their first exposure to the composer. Don't get me wrong, Jarvi is amazing in this music, but sometimes I feel he pushes the music a bit too hard in some sections where a bit more lyricism would be preferred.
The Volmer set is fine - I especially liked his version of the epic Symphony 2 'Legendary'.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: ørfeo on January 04, 2017, 11:50:17 PM
Right. See you in 10 years.

Oh man, I hope it's not that long of a wait. :)

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on January 04, 2017, 11:58:10 PM
The Volmer set is fine - I especially liked his version of the epic Symphony 2 'Legendary'.

Very nice, Jeffrey. Do you own his recording the complete Kratt as well?

Madiel

Quote from: Mirror Image on January 05, 2017, 06:12:59 AM
Oh man, I hope it's not that long of a wait. :)

Well, maybe not. I was thinking of the chances of me actually listening to two complete Tubin cycles, and trying to be optimistic so as not to scare you.

You may just have to wait until the "am I putting Tubin symphonies on the shopping list" question gets answered "yes" and THEN gets transformed into "which Tubin symphonies set am I buying?", and then I get around to trying a comparison on iTunes of samples of each.

So maybe only a couple of years.
Nobody has to apologise for using their brain.

Mirror Image

#219
Quote from: ørfeo on January 05, 2017, 12:13:49 PM
Well, maybe not. I was thinking of the chances of me actually listening to two complete Tubin cycles, and trying to be optimistic so as not to scare you.

You may just have to wait until the "am I putting Tubin symphonies on the shopping list" question gets answered "yes" and THEN gets transformed into "which Tubin symphonies set am I buying?", and then I get around to trying a comparison on iTunes of samples of each.

So maybe only a couple of years.

Well, if I'm alive then, I look forward to your response. ;) Jarvi seems to be the go-to set for Tubin's symphonies, but I hear a lot of good things about Volmer's cycle. Personally, I can't wait to dig into the Volmer since I don't know it at all with the exception of his recording of Kratt, which was fantastic.