0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That reminded me of a gag on The Simpsons:
Again you've picked one that I don't really see anything wrong with.
The late Chick Corea's album covers ran the gamut, from attractive to...this:
Everything! All the adaptations (puppets, animations, films and other commercial merchandising rubbish) of De Smurfen/ Schtroumpfs/ Smurfs are really bad and very ugly. The original Peyo drawings are fine and often funny.
So why have they used a photo of the Moon when it’s neither a movement in the work nor a planet?
I liked them when I was a child. At first they were called 'snøvserne' here, but a local author complained about it, since he had already written children's books about a different creature also called a 'snøvs', and their name was then quickly changed into 'smølferne' ... they did develop into something less gracious and more heavily commercialized with the passage of time; albums have been released at least until 2017 ...
On could surely build a "The Planets" LP collection, just on the basis/subject of the varied covers and their content/attitude.
Wikipedia article on Peyo: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peyo
So, just curious, when were the first photos of Mars?PD
Decent photos, mid-60s. Telescope images are terrible because when Mars is close enough the Sun shines directly down so there is not much in the way of shadows to provide detail of the terrain. That is why for a long time people thought they were seeing great canals of Mars when they were not.
