Discovering Johann Nepomuk Hummel

Started by mahlertitan, May 03, 2007, 10:36:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

robnewman

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 03, 2009, 10:22:55 AM
Not that this materially alters your regrets, but you were certainly able to do this.  It isn't any question of ability.

Er, you're wrong. In fact, the search engine facility on the forum was not working for fully 10 minutes before I posted. I tried it repeatedly. And I've already said I am sorry to have posted when there is already a thread running on the subject. A fact which I have acted on in the last 5 minutes with Mendelssohn (as even you can surely see).

Tried civility recently ?
:)



Opus106

Regards,
Navneeth

karlhenning


robnewman


karlhenning

Quote from: robnewman on June 03, 2009, 10:51:47 AM
Tried civility recently ?

Regularly, as you would know if you read my posts regularly.

In all events, I entertain certain doubts that many in the forum would appeal to you for any ruling on civility.

And, if you are honest, you would suffer much the same doubt.

Gabriel

Quote from: zamyrabyrd on June 03, 2009, 10:41:34 AM
I downloaded some of his music and really can't stand ANY of it.

But as I repeat, that is MY opinion...

The "pompous fillers" you describe in your posts do exist (I think of some of the piano concertos), but I wouldn't agree in my opinion in stating that all the music by Hummel has the same features. But I'm afraid he's quite irregular. As I stated before, in my opinion he composed some of the most beautiful works of the classical era, but you can find as well inconsistent works by him.

SonicMan46

Quote from: robnewman on June 03, 2009, 11:29:42 AM
Thanks Op.67 ! That's very useful.

Opus - amazing what already is available in this forum on certain composers!  :D

I even posted a link to the 'old' forum on Hummel in that thread, which also had plenty of information!  :-\

zamyrabyrd

Quote from: Gabriel on June 03, 2009, 12:19:55 PM
The "pompous fillers" you describe in your posts do exist (I think of some of the piano concertos), but I wouldn't agree in my opinion in stating that all the music by Hummel has the same features. But I'm afraid he's quite irregular. As I stated before, in my opinion he composed some of the most beautiful works of the classical era, but you can find as well inconsistent works by him.

I have a recording of one of his piano concertos. While there are some perhaps nice moments, there is really no consistency in joining up and/or relating the material to the rest of the piece. The problem here is form and content. Ideally, the content should define the form. When the forms become worn out as in poetry, new ones are developed. Otherwise, you can have rhyming doggerel ad infinitum.

While some composers in the Romantic period poured new wine into old bottles (those who still used 'sonata' forms), the same ones though wrote intermezzi, ballades, songs without words, fantasies , etc., and some even changed the original molds of sonata and concerto like Liszt. Beethoven himself was moving in different directions with his late piano sonatas and string quartets.

Music, if I may be so bold, is more about the how and less about the what. A two note theme, with the first repeated 3x as in Beethoven's 5th symphony is nothing without development. In fact, the latter is everything. A composer in the beginning of the 19th century who could not rise to the occasion and have the content define the form, instead use the latter for a catch-all for any ideas, failed formally. Here is where form is practically everything. And by the way, a sonata was a living entity in the Classic period, with so many variations by Haydn for instance.

If I hadn't been confronted with lately reviewing so-called modern sonatas, fugues, waltzes, even mazurkas, just because they have a certain rhythm, or two themes and the second modulates before the double bar, etc., the issue would not be so much in my face, that is, the necessity to define what actually makes good or bad music.

In fact, it might be worthwhile to have a discussion on the latter point.

ZB
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one."

― Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

robnewman

#88
Post amended in line with the earlier notification that the topic brought up can only be referred to in the specific designated thread on Mozart Fraud. Such discussion will not be spreading across the board into other threads.

Knight


Saul

#89
A much underrated composer, in my opinion he is great.
His 3th piano concerto is astonishing.

Johann Nepomuk Hummel or Jan Nepomuk Hummel (November 14, 1778 – October 17, 1837) was an Austrian composer and virtuoso pianist. His music reflects the transition from the Classical to the Romantic musical era.

http://www.youtube.com/v/zboCrptAYIU


Josquin des Prez

His piano concertos are very good. His piano sonatas and chamber music i found to be forced and labored, and not really to my taste. Haven't tried his religious music yet.

Holden

You've heard his piano trios and found them "forced"? This is some of the most sublime chamber music I've ever heard.
Cheers

Holden

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: Holden on April 23, 2010, 01:04:14 AM
You've heard his piano trios and found them "forced"? This is some of the most sublime chamber music I've ever heard.

I heard his piano quintet and some of the piano trios. Maybe i just listened to the wrong ones. Which of the trios would you recommend?

Holden

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on April 23, 2010, 05:57:48 AM
I heard his piano quintet and some of the piano trios. Maybe i just listened to the wrong ones. Which of the trios would you recommend?

This is available from Amazon. It is one of my desert island discs.

Cheers

Holden

Bulldog

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on April 23, 2010, 05:57:48 AM
I heard his piano quintet and some of the piano trios. Maybe i just listened to the wrong ones. Which of the trios would you recommend?

I find his best to be his last four - Op. 65, 83, 93 and 96.  As I posted a couple of years ago on this thread, I'm thrilled with a MDG 2-disc set performed by the Parnassus Trio that includes all the piano trios.

SonicMan46

Quote from: Bulldog on April 23, 2010, 03:50:59 PM
I find his best to be his last four - Op. 65, 83, 93 and 96.  As I posted a couple of years ago on this thread, I'm thrilled with a MDG 2-disc set performed by the Parnassus Trio that includes all the piano trios. Re: Josquin

Well, I've owned the 2-CD set mentioned by Don for a while - if you cannot enjoy these performances, then may be this whole era of music is not to your liking?   :-\


Josquin des Prez


Que

Any HIPPI recording availble of the piano trios?  :)

Because for music from that era, Beaux Arts et al. won't do. $:)  ;)

Q

Bogey

Quote from: Que on April 23, 2010, 11:23:12 PM
Any HIPPI recording availble of the piano trios?  :)

Because for music from that era, Beaux Arts et al. won't do. $:)  ;)

Q

Look out! ;D
There will never be another era like the Golden Age of Hollywood.  We didn't know how to blow up buildings then so we had no choice but to tell great stories with great characters.-Ben Mankiewicz

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: Que on April 23, 2010, 11:23:12 PM
Because for music from that era, Beaux Arts et al. won't do. $:)  ;)

In my experience, the HIP movement hasn't been anywhere near as successful with classical music has it has been with the Baroque. Hummel was a contemporary of Beethoven. Modern instruments ought to be as suited to his music as they are for the latter.