My Art thread

Started by Saul, May 08, 2008, 10:02:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

маразм1

Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 07:08:26 AM
Most artists learn how to draw the human figure. That's my understanding anyway.
Exactly.  Just like a composer needs to know how to write and read music, before composing "4'33". 

mn dave

Quote from: маразм1 on June 05, 2008, 07:19:03 AM
Exactly.  Just like a composer needs to know how to write and read music, before composing "4'33". 

Right. Learn the rules before you break them.  :)

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Saul on June 05, 2008, 06:58:17 AM
Again, youre a stupid moron for not understanding, you schmuck.

Grow up, and try to learn to repsect people.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Saul

Quote from: Sforzando on June 05, 2008, 07:25:15 AM
Grow up, and try to learn to repsect people.

And you are a troll.

Dont you forget that.

Saul

Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 07:21:07 AM
Right. Learn the rules before you break them.  :)

Stupid assertion.

There are different forms of expression, and drawing a face or a human body has nothing to do with it.

You guys are ignorant on an astronomical level.

Thank G-d that I got great letters from real famous artists that support and love my art.

Praise from artists is better then an insult from the ignorant.


mn dave

Quote from: Saul on June 05, 2008, 08:51:30 AM
Thank G-d that I got great letters from real famous artists that support and love my art.

Who would that be?

pjme





Enjoy and then STOP!
P.

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Saul on June 05, 2008, 08:48:19 AM
And you are a troll.

Dont you forget that.

Grow up, and try to learn to repsect people.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Joe_Campbell

The proper way to do photoshop art:

greg

Quote from: маразм1 on June 05, 2008, 07:19:03 AM
Exactly.  Just like a composer needs to know how to write and read music, before composing "4'33". 
Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 07:21:07 AM
Right. Learn the rules before you break them.  :)
couldn't agree more.....

Quote from: JCampbell on June 05, 2008, 10:19:07 AM
The proper way to do photoshop art:

that's cool....... Dali is that one?

Joe_Campbell

It was a photoshop contest finalist. It's a combination of a bunch of Dali's work into one natural collage. Very well done! :)

flyingdutchman

Quote from: Saul on June 05, 2008, 08:51:30 AM

Thank G-d that I got great letters from real famous artists that support and love my art.

Praise from artists is better then an insult from the ignorant.



Sounds to me like your a desperate little man who is starved for attention.

gomro

Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 05:38:32 AM
I like your stuff, gomro.

Good! Here's another, just finished about 2 days ago: an illustration of the nameless creature from John Campbell's seminal sci-fi tale, "Who Goes There?" When Howard Hawks filmed it (as "The Thing from Another World") the monster was James Arness in a Frankenstein suit; when John Carpenter filmed it (as "The Thing") he got the shape-changing right, but never showed us the Thing the way the author described it. So here it is:

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: jo jo starbuck on June 05, 2008, 03:59:49 PM
Sounds to me like your a desperate little man who is starved for attention.

I would certainly appreciate an opportunity to review and critique YOUR artwork... :)

8)

----------------
Listening to:
Philharmonia Orchestra / Giulini Itzhak Perlman - Bia 432 Op 61 Concerto in D for Violin & Orchestra 1st mvmt - Allegro ma non troppo (cadenza: Kreisler)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

mn dave

Quote from: gomro on June 05, 2008, 05:16:44 PM
Good! Here's another, just finished about 2 days ago: an illustration of the nameless creature from John Campbell's seminal sci-fi tale, "Who Goes There?" When Howard Hawks filmed it (as "The Thing from Another World") the monster was James Arness in a Frankenstein suit; when John Carpenter filmed it (as "The Thing") he got the shape-changing right, but never showed us the Thing the way the author described it. So here it is:


You need your own art thread!

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 06:00:25 PM
You need your own art thread!

Definitely. That's a neat picture. Great color sense and design. What medium are you working in?
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

gomro

Quote from: Sforzando on June 05, 2008, 06:12:32 PM
Definitely. That's a neat picture. Great color sense and design. What medium are you working in?

They're "painted" directly to computer, with VicMan (drawing freeware I've had a while) and MSPaint. I've been thinking of buying some better software and a WiCom pad; I'm drawing by mouse and I'm sure that could be improved.  Here's a much more abstract bit, an effort to catch the impressions generated by a certain Stockhausen piece:

mn dave


gomro

Quote from: mn dave on June 05, 2008, 06:32:00 PM
That can't be easy.

Easier than drawing by cat, but not by much. Hyuk hyuk.  :P

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: gomro on June 05, 2008, 06:24:45 PM
They're "painted" directly to computer, with VicMan (drawing freeware I've had a while) and MSPaint. I've been thinking of buying some better software and a WiCom pad; I'm drawing by mouse and I'm sure that could be improved.  Here's a much more abstract bit, an effort to catch the impressions generated by a certain Stockhausen piece:


That one doesn't seem to me as successful as the John Campbell monster piece. The background is a bit too busy and the foreground elements (which I take to be all the blue circles or ovals) don't really dominate and stand out as well as the Thing does in your other picture.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."