Opera Without Visuals

Started by mn dave, July 12, 2008, 02:18:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mn dave

This might be a fun topic. Who knows?

Which operas work best as pure music?

Anne

I think the last act of Wagner's Tristan und Isolde, or part of it, has been called a symphony.  I would highly recommend to you Joseph Kerman's book, Opera as Drama.  He has an entire chapter, 19 pages, titled "Opera as Symphonic Poem."

Dancing Divertimentian

Opera doesn't necessarily need 'visuals' to be a successful listen. At least for me. And especially for home listening. At home I'd rather sit back in my comfy chair and relax to the music rather than peer for 2-4 hours at a TV monitor. 

At the opera house it's total immersion - no comfy chair anyway so I might as well take a peek.


Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Anne on July 12, 2008, 06:36:27 PM
I think the last act of Wagner's Tristan und Isolde, or part of it, has been called a symphony.  I would highly recommend to you Joseph Kerman's book, Opera as Drama.  He has an entire chapter, 19 pages, titled "Opera as Symphonic Poem."

However, if you read what Kerman says in full, he is arguing explicitly against thinking of T+I as a symphony or as any kind of "pure music."
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Anne

#4
Quote from: Sforzando on July 14, 2008, 07:18:57 AM
However, if you read what Kerman says in full, he is arguing explicitly against thinking of T+I as a symphony or as any kind of "pure music."

Thank you, Sforzando.  I would not want to mislead someone.  I had another book, may have been from English National Opera series.  A friend borrowed it and didn't replace it.  I have to stop recommending off the top of my head.  My memory is not so good any more.  From now on I will read the source before giving it to someone else. 

Hector

Quote from: donwyn on July 12, 2008, 06:56:05 PM
Opera doesn't necessarily need 'visuals' to be a successful listen. At least for me. And especially for home listening. At home I'd rather sit back in my comfy chair and relax to the music rather than peer for 2-4 hours at a TV monitor. 

At the opera house it's total immersion - no comfy chair anyway so I might as well take a peek.




I couldn't agree more.

I have, also, sat in the opera house with my eyes closed on many occasions because the antics on stage were unbearable to watch.

marvinbrown

Quote from: donwyn on July 12, 2008, 06:56:05 PM
Opera doesn't necessarily need 'visuals' to be a successful listen. At least for me. And especially for home listening. At home I'd rather sit back in my comfy chair and relax to the music rather than peer for 2-4 hours at a TV monitor. 

At the opera house it's total immersion - no comfy chair anyway so I might as well take a peek.




  Sometimes, and you didn't hear this from me  ::), I'll turn the subtitles off and watch an opera on DVD.  I still need the visual aspects but for relaxing I don't want the hassle of having to read the libretto.

  marvin

mn dave

So, which ones do you like to, not watch, but listen to?

marvinbrown

Quote from: Apollo on July 15, 2008, 05:02:42 AM
So, which ones do you like to, not watch, but listen to?

  Well I have Wagner's Ring Cycle memorized by heart.  So I like to play the Levine DVD without subtitles and just watch the action on stage with the music. I feel the same way about Verdi's Aida and Puccini's La Boheme.  For some operas such as R. Strauss' Elektra and Berg's Wozzeck this does not work and a thorough reading of the libretto as I am listening is required. 

  marvin   

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: marvinbrown on July 15, 2008, 05:21:04 AM
  Well I have Wagner's Ring Cycle memorized by heart.  So I like to play the Levine DVD without subtitles and just watch the action on stage with the music. I feel the same way about Verdi's Aida and Puccini's La Boheme.  For some operas such as R. Strauss' Elektra and Berg's Wozzeck this does not work and a thorough reading of the libretto as I am listening is required. 

  marvin   

You are not, however, speaking of any of these operas as "pure music," in the sense that our Greek God implies. You are simply saying you know the librettos to some of these operas well enough that you don't have to follow along with the translations.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

marvinbrown

#10
Quote from: Sforzando on July 15, 2008, 05:47:50 AM
You are not, however, speaking of any of these operas as "pure music," in the sense that our Greek God implies. You are simply saying you know the librettos to some of these operas well enough that you don't have to follow along with the translations.

  True.  But it is a totally different experience than following the libretto and concentrating on the text.  At the risk of getting slaughtered by opera enthusiasts I find the experience of turning off the libretto quite enjoyable and liberating- it helps me concentrate more on the music.  If Appollo means just listening to an opera without any knowledge of the plot and characters for the sake of the music, well,  I never do that!  

  marvin

zamyrabyrd

This might be strange but I often listened to Madame Butterfly as music. I didn't really think about it until now but maybe the reason are the practically seamless transitions.
One doesn't feel: "OK, now we have the recitatives, aria and caballetta, duets etc." 
La Boheme and Rossini's Barbiere ditto (even with the obvious solos).

ZB
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one."

― Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

karlhenning

I don't think that strange at all, ZB.

mn dave

Quote from: zamyrabyrd on July 15, 2008, 07:15:35 AM
This might be strange but I often listened to Madame Butterfly as music. I didn't really think about it until now but maybe the reason are the practically seamless transitions.
One doesn't feel: "OK, now we have the recitatives, aria and caballetta, duets etc." 
La Boheme and Rossini's Barbiere ditto (even with the obvious solos).

ZB

Good answer! Thanks.

zamyrabyrd

Quote from: karlhenning on July 15, 2008, 07:19:46 AM
I don't think that strange at all, ZB.


Thanks. It's nice to have validation every now and then.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one."

― Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

karlhenning

Otherwise, we're going to be like, Are you really listening to ballet if you're not watching people dance to it?  8)


zamyrabyrd

Quote from: karlhenning on July 15, 2008, 07:34:54 AM
Otherwise, we're going to be like, Are you really listening to ballet if you're not watching people dance to it?  8)

Been there, done that.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one."

― Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: karlhenning on July 15, 2008, 07:34:54 AM
Otherwise, we're going to be like, Are you really listening to ballet if you're not watching people dance to it?  8)

Balanchine said that if you don't like watching the dancers, you can close your eyes and attend a very nice concert. Nonetheless, I'm convinced that there are ballets that don't reveal their full dimensions unless both choreography and music are experienced. Stravinsky's Agon, for one. (Not that I don't enjoy listening to that one, and frequently. But an entirely new layer is added when the work is seen, to Balanchine's choreography.)
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

karlhenning

Quote from: Sforzando on July 15, 2008, 08:45:54 AM
(Not that I don't enjoy listening to that one, and frequently. But an entirely new layer is added when the work is seen, to Balanchine's choreography.)

Sure.