Your Favorite Composer for the Piano

Started by Don, August 28, 2008, 07:23:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Name Your Favored Composer

Chopin
17 (40.5%)
Liszt
4 (9.5%)
Mendelssohn
3 (7.1%)
Schumann
18 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Voting closed: September 02, 2008, 07:23:28 AM

anasazi

I didn't vote.  No Rachmaninoff, no Ravel, no Debussy.  Just not enough choices.

Wanderer

Limiting myself to the available choices, I'd go with Schumann and Liszt (between which, the vote goes to the underdog).

I also rate Alkan and Medtner most highly, both composing almost exclusively for the piano.






val


Mark

I just nudged Chopin into the lead. But I wanted Debussy. :(

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: M forever on August 28, 2008, 08:12:33 PM
(and the fact that he has managed to fool many generations of musicians so far).

He obviously didn't fool Wagner, and the reception of his music has always been a mixed bag, so you are definitely wrong about that.

mn dave

Even though I enjoy Schumann, I'm surprised he is any sort of competition for Chopin.

Don

Quote from: mn dave on August 29, 2008, 07:26:18 AM
Even though I enjoy Schumann, I'm surprised he is any sort of competition for Chopin.

I'm also surprised - but pleased.

DavidRoss

#27
Quote from: mn dave on August 29, 2008, 07:26:18 AM
Even though I enjoy Schumann, I'm surprised he is any sort of competition for Chopin.
Well, the following opinion may just be ignorant drivel on my part--in which case legions of GMGers will no doubt pounce to set me straight--but Chopin seems just a bit on the precious side to me, whereas Schumann is a bit more manly.

I probably just need to listen to more Chopin.  Every time I do I'm reminded why people regard him as great, but I'm rarely interested in coming back for more.
"Maybe the problem most of you have ... is that you're not listening to Barbirolli." ~Sarge

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher

mn dave

#28
Quote from: DavidRoss on August 29, 2008, 09:10:06 AM
Well, the following opinion may just be ignorant drivel on my part--in which case legions of GMGers will no doubt pounce to set me straight--but Chopin seems just a bit on the precious side to me, whereas Schumann is a bit more manly.

I probably just need to listen to more Chopin.  Every time I do I'm reminded why people regard him as great, but I'm rarely interested in coming back for more.

You bastard.



;)

[Edit: I don't think testosterone levels factor into my enjoyment of music.]

Que

Beethoven, closely followed by Schubert.

Q

hjonkers

With the Variations Sérieuses tolling in my head for weeks now, and because he's so underrated, my vote is going to Mendelssohn. I'm not sure any other composer wrote such eminently pianistic music.

Ten thumbs

Quote from: Que on August 29, 2008, 12:57:31 PM
Beethoven, closely followed by Schubert.

Q
As the question was 'favorite composer' this is fair enough. Whilst these composers wrote great piano music, I didn't mention them (or Bach and Mozart) because I was thinking of the piano as the instrument stands now. In Beethoven's day this was relatively new. He certainly used its power but not the full range of its possibilities. Schubert showed a mastery of its tonal values especially in his songs. The extension of musical expression on the piano was begun by Weber and Hummel but it was left to the next generation to exploit it to the full. This does not detract in the least from earlier composers, it is merely an accident of history.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.

Don

The voting has closed, and I'm rather surprised at the results.  I thought Chopin would be at the top with both Schumann and Liszt close behind.  That Liszt barely had more votes than Mendelssohn was a result I never would have dreamed; after all, Mendelssohn is not best known for his piano works.

ezodisy

Quote from: Don on September 02, 2008, 09:14:06 AM
The voting has closed

The voting has now reopened with ezodisy pushing Shoppin' level with Shoeman. I would take Rachmaninoff, Albeniz and Satie before Liszt and Mendelssohn, with a bottle of scotch whisky replacing all 5.

Don

Quote from: ezodisy on September 05, 2008, 11:33:17 AM
The voting has now reopened with ezodisy pushing Shoppin' level with Shoeman. I would take Rachmaninoff, Albeniz and Satie before Liszt and Mendelssohn, with a bottle of scotch whisky replacing all 5.

Rachmaninoff's worth at least 2 bottles.

ezodisy

Quote from: Don on September 05, 2008, 12:09:45 PM
Rachmaninoff's worth at least 2 bottles.

You don't have to twist my arm to pick up a second bottle ;)

This should put the name argument to bed


imperfection


Ten thumbs

Mendelssohn suffers from the popular delusion that sad music is somehow superior to cheerful music. Once you've rid yourself of this bullshit, Mendelssohn comes out pretty well.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.

springrite

For twenty years, I'd say Schumann. But for the past few years, it has been Medtner.

ezodisy

Quote from: Ten thumbs on September 06, 2008, 08:49:14 AM
Mendelssohn suffers from the popular delusion that sad music is somehow superior to cheerful music. Once you've rid yourself of this bullshit, Mendelssohn comes out pretty well.

I wouldn't call it bullshit, just a modern appreciation of classical music :)