What were you listening to? (CLOSED)

Started by Maciek, April 06, 2007, 02:22:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 24 Guests are viewing this topic.


bhodges

Quote from: Robert on August 24, 2007, 08:01:39 AM
WOW, whats this??

I was just wondering that myself!  Looks fascinating...

--Bruce

Haffner

Quote from: Que on August 24, 2007, 06:58:58 AM
I like the quartet version, but prefer the choral version - essential Haydn IMO.

But it needs a good performer: Nikolaus Harnoncourt and the Concentus Musicus Wien is my favourite.



Q





Hey thanks! The Harnoncourt looks particularly great!

Haffner

Quote from: Robert on August 24, 2007, 07:28:50 AM
IMHO Kodaly is great in this and the entire Haydn String qts....I have quite a few versions of this particular one, but this one and Mosaiques are my two favs.....





Thanks, Robert! For me, Kodaly and QM are usually no-brainers!


not edward

Quote from: val on August 24, 2007, 12:36:06 AM
But even Arrau seems pale when compared to the first version of Brendel (VOX): very spontaneous, tumultuous, with a passion and a violence that I had never heard in this work. It is difficult to believe that this is the same man that years later recorded for PHILIPS a version, more perfect perhaps, but cold as an iceberg.

The VOX CD of Brendel also includes an extraordinary version of the Sonata in B minor. In my opinion the best recording of Alfred Brendel.

I'm no pianophile, but this is certainly my favourite of the Brendel recordings I own. It's hard to believe that the passionate young man who recorded these sonatas could produce emotionally sterile performances in his later years.

I'm currently listening to Aimard and Boulez in Ligeti's piano concerto--not the studio recording but a live aircheck with the CSO. It's a very different performance to the studio reading--not as hard-edged, more lyrical, some slower tempi allowing the music more time to breathe (though sometimes at a slight cost in emotional febrility). The playing is every bit as good as you'd expect from this combination.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

beclemund

Quote from: Robert on August 24, 2007, 08:01:39 AMWOW, whats this??

Quote from: bhodges on August 24, 2007, 08:02:10 AMI was just wondering that myself!  Looks fascinating...

It turns out to be quite an interesting story about the discovery of a lost discography. The performances are all quite engaging. I have to admit, I have not really explored a whole lot of solo piano music, so I am probably the last person to speak on the quality of a performance. I do enjoy this set, however. The transfers are up and down as some are from older recordings all from tape source that the performer maintained herself.

Check out that link to Arbiter's essay on it...

I am not sure where I came across the story. It did get me curious enough to explore the collection, and I am glad I did. Arbiter has released other sets of her work as well.
"A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession." -- Albert Camus

Que

#8966


Disc 2:      
Ravel - Tzigane (Rapsodie de concert)   
Clérambault - arranged for the G string: Largo in C Minor
Albéniz - Suite espanola Op. 47, no. 3: Sevilla, sevillanas
Debussy - from L' enfant prodigue: Prélude   
Dohnányi - Ruralia hungarica, Op.32, no. 6: Gypsy andante
Elgar - La capricieuse, Op. 17   
Milhaud - Saudades do Brasil, no. 9: Sumare
Vivaldi - Sonata Op. 2, No. 2, RV 31   
Mozart -  Concerto No. 5 , KV 219 (With Barbirolli & the London Philharmonia Orchestra)
Paganini - Caprice No. 13 in B-Flat
Bach - from English Suite No. 3 BWV 808: Gavotte I & Gavotte II (Musette)


Q

Robert

Quote from: beclemund on August 24, 2007, 08:53:44 AM
It turns out to be quite an interesting story about the discovery of a lost discography. The performances are all quite engaging. I have to admit, I have not really explored a whole lot of solo piano music, so I am probably the last person to speak on the quality of a performance. I do enjoy this set, however. The transfers are up and down as some are from older recordings all from tape source that the performer maintained herself.

Check out that link to Arbiter's essay on it...

I am not sure where I came across the story. It did get me curious enough to explore the collection, and I am glad I did. Arbiter has released other sets of her work as well.
Todd,
Can you shed any light on this??

Robert

Quote from: beclemund on August 24, 2007, 08:53:44 AM
It turns out to be quite an interesting story about the discovery of a lost discography. The performances are all quite engaging. I have to admit, I have not really explored a whole lot of solo piano music, so I am probably the last person to speak on the quality of a performance. I do enjoy this set, however. The transfers are up and down as some are from older recordings all from tape source that the performer maintained herself.

Check out that link to Arbiter's essay on it...

I am not sure where I came across the story. It did get me curious enough to explore the collection, and I am glad I did. Arbiter has released other sets of her work as well.
In checking this out...Qualiton is the source. $17.00 is the price for two discs. I thought it was a Bartok disc but there are only three Bartok compositions........

beclemund

Quote from: Robert on August 24, 2007, 09:55:53 AMIn checking this out...Qualiton is the source. $17.00 is the price for two discs. I thought it was a Bartok disc but there are only three Bartok compositions........

Amazon has a couple of copies used for under 10 USD.
"A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession." -- Albert Camus

Lilas Pastia

Quote from: Que on August 24, 2007, 06:58:58 AM
I like the quartet version, but prefer the choral version - essential Haydn IMO.

But it needs a good performer: Nikolaus Harnoncourt and the Concentus Musicus Wien is my favourite.



Q

Personally it's the reverse for me. Quartet version first, , then Oratorio or chamber orchestra versions (equally). But they're all great. One of Haydn's undisputed masterpieces.

Christo

Quote from: pjme on August 23, 2007, 12:47:58 PM
yesterday on Dutch TV : Concertgebouw & Haitink in Bruckner 8. What a great orchestra - Bruckner, as ever : strange, very strange music!
Peter  

Happy to learn that you watched them, too !
... music is not only an 'entertainment', nor a mere luxury, but a necessity of the spiritual if not of the physical life, an opening of those magic casements through which we can catch a glimpse of that country where ultimate reality will be found.    RVW, 1948

Solitary Wanderer

#8972


Ravel ~ La Valse



Bartok ~ Concerto for Orchestra



Disc.1. 2nd half Act.2. &  Disc.2. Act.3.
'I lingered round them, under that benign sky: watched the moths fluttering among the heath and harebells, listened to the soft wind breathing through the grass, and wondered how any one could ever imagine unquiet slumbers for the sleepers in that quiet earth.' ~ Emily Bronte

George



Nice stuff!! Very romantic reading.  8)

not edward



(Opp 20-22, anyway. Skipped the First Chamber Symphony.)
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

mateusz182


hornteacher

Quote from: M forever on August 23, 2007, 06:26:27 PM
Just wait until your girlfriend finds out you said that. Then you are in deep, deep trouble.
;D

Oh crap.   :o

Mark

Quote from: mateusz182 on August 24, 2007, 01:55:46 PM
Phantom of the opera [1987]

Hey buddy, we have a non-classical music listening thread for stuff like this.


;D

(PS: Welcome to the forum. :))

George

Quote from: Mark on August 24, 2007, 01:58:35 PM
Hey buddy, we have a non-classical music listening thread for stuff like this.

Again the avatar fits nicely.  $:)

Mark