What were you listening to? (CLOSED)

Started by Maciek, April 06, 2007, 02:22:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 37 Guests are viewing this topic.

Antoine Marchand

Quote from: Coopmv on June 09, 2009, 06:11:30 PM
Thanks Antoine for the many interesting YouTube. 

You're welcome, Coop.

Quote from: Coopmv on June 09, 2009, 06:11:30 PM
While the SQ of this SACD set may be one of the best for Brandenburg Concertos, I am still in the wait-and-see camp when it comes to Richard Egarr and the AAM.  Only time will tell if he is a worthy successor to Christopher Hogwood who is not only an excellent harpsichordist and a renown musicologist who has appointments at both Cambridge and Harvard. 

If that is your point of view about Egarr, certainly this recording provides very fine arguments in favor of him. Not just the sound quality, but the music itself is crystal clear.

FideLeo

#48761


Partially supplies the justification for playing JSB's WTC on the organ. 
HIP for all and all for HIP! Harpsichord for Bach, fortepiano for Beethoven and pianoforte for Brahms!

Brian

Dmitry Shostakovich
Symphony No 5
Yakov Kreizberg
Russian National Orchestra

Que

Quote from: masolino on June 09, 2009, 08:19:02 PM


Partially supplies the justification for playing JSB's WTC on the organ. 

Morning, that is HIP, I presume? :) Not familiar with Fischer - interesting music?

NOW:



Q

mahler10th

 ;D

Opus106

Morning, John! Which symphony? :)
Regards,
Navneeth

FideLeo

#48766
Quote from: Que on June 09, 2009, 10:01:46 PM
Morning, that is HIP, I presume? :) Not familiar with Fischer - interesting music?

This recording was made in 1985, and it was played on a (then) newly restored Schnitger
organ, so it is HIP to an extent.  But I don't find the performance to be that interesting.
(Or I should probably say that it is as interesting as Trevor Pinnock's Goldberg Variations
- those 1980s' HIP performances sound to me to be curiously straight-laced and earnest.)  
A pity really, given the importance of this music in baroque keyboard literature.



Consisting of twenty preludes and fugues in most major and minor keys plus five
ricercars on chorale tunes, this foretells the similar collections to come from JSB.  
Bach obviously knew this collection from 1702/15, and quoted Fischer's theme in the
same key for the E major fugue in Book II.

Other recordings of Fischer music include Luc Beausejour's 2 Volumes of Musical
Parnassus
on Naxos (harpsichord) which I have not heard.
HIP for all and all for HIP! Harpsichord for Bach, fortepiano for Beethoven and pianoforte for Brahms!

val

RAMEAU:    Suites of Dardanus & Les Boréades              / Orchestra of the 18th Century, Brüggen

The less convincing of Brüggen's recordings. There is no dynamic, the uniformity of the rhythm becomes very boring. Brüggen himself doesn't seem very familiar to this music. Gardiner or Minkowski in their recordings of this operas show how Rameau should be directed with all his rhythmic fantasy.

mahler10th

Quote from: opus106 on June 09, 2009, 11:31:17 PM
Morning, John! Which symphony? :)

5,7,9
:D
Solti gave this music UPLIFTING POWER in a way which is not often portrayed.
Still...Naumann CPO for his finer interpretations, Tennstedt and Bernstien for passion, and Kubelik for poetic renderings.

This Solti / Mahler set makes my first full Mahler set since unfortunate events lost me almost all of my collecton a few months back...(minus Mahlers 10th, Solti didn't do it, but I have something from Cato to redress that balance).

For anyone coming to Mahler, Solti is a great place to start, and for anyone ending Mahler he's a fine place to finish too.

bobby quine

Allan Pettersson
Symphony no 16
Yuri Ahronovitch
Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra

George

Recital Rosenthal

(8 Mazurkas)

Moritz Rosenthal (piano)

Recorded in 1931, 1935, 1937

_____________________________

I had the above at the start of a compilation, then a few Chopin recordings by Sofronitsky. Interesting thing was I was listening to this on the way to work and one performance really stood out and I thought to myself, wow, Rosenthal is incredible. When I looked down to see which track it was, it was Sofronitsky playing a Nocturne! It was one of those "time stands still" moments. I hadn't thought that I liked Sofronitsky all that much, but I guess I should be looking into more of his stuff.

Drasko

Quote from: val on June 10, 2009, 01:47:16 AM
RAMEAU:    Suites of Dardanus & Les Boréades              / Orchestra of the 18th Century, Brüggen

The less convincing of Brüggen's recordings. There is no dynamic, the uniformity of the rhythm becomes very boring. Brüggen himself doesn't seem very familiar to this music. Gardiner or Minkowski in their recordings of this operas show how Rameau should be directed with all his rhythmic fantasy.

Completely agreed! Couldn't believe how grey and dull those Bruggen performances were when first heard them. Actually went and compared some of the pieces with Minkowski's Une symphonie imaginaire disc, level of alertness, color and zest with Minkowski were incomparable. Sounded like different music. Ditched that Bruggen disc after few spins.



op.127

karlhenning

Quote from: Feanor on June 09, 2009, 05:31:02 PM
Thank you for that!  :D

I see that both the Jansons and Ančerl are available from ArkivMusic as "ArkivCD" reissues.

Delighted to be of service to you, neighbor!

I have the original single-disc release of the Jansons, which includes a splendid rendition of the Shostakovich orchestration of Musorgsky's Songs & Dances of Death. So I am hoping this is what the "ArkivCD" reissue may be!

karlhenning

#48773
Quote from: Brian on June 09, 2009, 05:55:12 PM
I think it's the greatest symphony of the 20th century.  :)  I haven't heard Ancerl but very much want to . . . .

Probably, the metronome marking that Shostakovich inked for the second movement is impossibly fast for any orchestra.  But Ančerl and the Czech Phil make an exhilirating attempt at it!
Edit :: typo

not edward

Quote from: ChamberNut on June 09, 2009, 05:25:29 PM
Which orchestra with Zinman?  Tonhalle Zurich or Baltimore SO?
Tonhalle Zurich. I have the same issue with his Schumann that I do with his Beethoven with the same orchestra; the tempi are exciting but the phrasing and shaping of the works feel undercharacterized to me.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

karlhenning

Thread duty:

Dmitri Dmitriyevich
Symphony № 10 in E Minor, Opus 93
Prague Symphony
Maksim Dmitriyevich

karlhenning

Again, for present comparison purposes:

Dmitri Dmitriyevich
Symphony № 10 in E Minor, Opus 93
ii. Allegro
Prague Symphony
Maksim Dmitriyevich

karlhenning

And now:

Dmitri Dmitriyevich
Symphony № 10 in E Minor, Opus 93
ii. Allegro
Moscow Phil
Kirill Petrovich

Opus106

Please be more informative and mention the exact bar. Thank you.

;D

Thread duty:

Jean-Philippe Rameau
L'Entretien des Muses
Gustav Leonhardt


Regards,
Navneeth