6 favourite v 6 greatest composers

Started by vandermolen, November 07, 2008, 07:43:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bulldog

Quote from: Al Moritz on November 11, 2008, 09:25:35 AM
Greatest:
(The list requires diversity of genre which, sadly, leaves out Bruckner and Mahler; a few otherwise worthy contenders are left out too.)


I can't go along with the diversity requirement, because a few composers were so compelling in their specialty that to leave them out of the great category would be unreasonable.  Al already mentioned Bruckner and Mahler; Wagner and Chopin apply as well.


jwinter

My six current favorites, based on time in my CD player/iPod:  Beethoven, Brahms, Bruckner, Mozart, Sibelius, Tchaikovsky

Six greats:  Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Chopin, Haydn, Mozart.

Six dislikes:  There aren't six.  There are several that on first or second listen did not appeal to me, but in none of those cases have I gone back and listened to enough of their music to form a really solid opinion.  There are still too many composers that grabbed me from the start and that I'm still exploring -- too much music, too little time.
The man that hath no music in himself,
Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds,
Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils.
The motions of his spirit are dull as night,
And his affections dark as Erebus.
Let no such man be trusted.

-- William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice

mn dave

#102
I tallied the faves (because I'm such a nice guy). If someone picked seven (because there was a "tie"), then I dropped off the last one. Composers with only one vote are not listed.

13 votes - Beethoven

10 votes - Brahms

9 votes - Mahler

8 votes - Bruckner and Mozart

7 votes - Bach

6 votes - Sibelius

4 votes - Haydn and Schubert

3 votes - Brian, Chopin, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky, Vaughan Williams and Wagner

2 votes - Atterburg, Bartok, Copland, Delius, Elgar, Handel, Ligeti, Medtner, Nielsen, Norgard, Prokofiev, Schoenberg, Schumann, Shostakovich, Stravinsky and Webern

Dundonnell

Well done and Thank You for doing this :)

mn dave


vandermolen

Quote from: mn dave on November 12, 2008, 05:26:26 PM
I tallied the faves (because I'm such a nice guy). If someone picked seven (because there was a "tie"), then I dropped off the last one. Composers with only one vote are not listed.

13 votes - Beethoven

10 votes - Brahms

9 votes - Mahler

8 votes - Bruckner and Mozart

7 votes - Bach

6 votes - Sibelius

4 votes - Haydn and Schubert

3 votes - Brian, Chopin, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky, Vaughan Williams and Wagner

2 votes - Atterburg, Bartok, Copland, Delius, Elgar, Handel, Ligeti, Medtner, Nielsen, Norgard, Prokofiev, Schoenberg, Schumann, Shostakovich, Stravinsky and Webern


As I started this thread, a big thank you from me too.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

mn dave


karlhenning

Well, at least Stravinsky got as many votes as Medtner  8)

mn dave

Who knew, about Atterburg and Norgard?  ???

Kullervo

Quote from: mn dave on November 13, 2008, 04:28:33 AM
Who knew, about Atterburg and Norgard?  ???

Nørgård is a well-kept secret. :D

J.Z. Herrenberg

Quote from: Corey on November 13, 2008, 05:04:21 AM
Nørgård is a well-kept secret. :D

... whose Third I still must find time for.  :-[
Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything. -- Plato

The new erato

Quote from: Corey on November 13, 2008, 05:04:21 AM
Nørgård is a well-kept secret. :D
Atterburg took me slightly by surprise. Atterberg would be a slightly different proposition.

Kullervo

Quote from: Jezetha on November 13, 2008, 05:06:11 AM
... whose Third I still must find time for.  :-[

Everyone should find time for him. He should be at least as popular as Carter or Rihm (to name two popular living composers).

Dundonnell

Quote from: Corey on November 13, 2008, 06:08:20 AM
Everyone should find time for him. He should be at least as popular as Carter or Rihm (to name two popular living composers).

Not universally popular, of course ;)

Sef

Quote from: mn dave on November 13, 2008, 04:28:33 AM
Who knew, about Atterburg and Norgard?  ???
.... and I can't believe that this forum couldn't stump up one more vote for Pettersson!
"Do you think that I could have composed what I have composed, do you think that one can write a single note with life in it if one sits there and pities oneself?"

mn dave

Quote from: Sef on November 13, 2008, 06:58:32 AM
.... and I can't believe that this forum couldn't stump up one more vote for Pettersson!

Hm. He must have some stiff competition. ;)

greg


Sef

Quote from: G$ on November 13, 2008, 03:13:18 PM
Same for Atterberg.  8)
.... but at $30 for his 9 complete symphonies (no matter what you think of the 9th), there's no reason why he should be a secret. Just about the best value for money box set I've seen in a long while.
"Do you think that I could have composed what I have composed, do you think that one can write a single note with life in it if one sits there and pities oneself?"

Bulldog

Quote from: Sef on November 13, 2008, 03:34:31 PM
.... but at $30 for his 9 complete symphonies (no matter what you think of the 9th), there's no reason why he should be a secret. Just about the best value for money box set I've seen in a long while.

Even at $1 for the complete set, Atterberg would tend to be a secret.

greg

I would've payed $70 for that set if I had to.



Quote from: Bulldog on November 13, 2008, 04:50:11 PM
Even at $1 for the complete set, Atterberg would tend to be a secret.
As I keep saying, it's because he's Swedish. They just have it hard.