GMG Classical Music Forum

The Back Room => The Diner => Topic started by: JBS on March 12, 2020, 07:03:50 PM

Title: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 12, 2020, 07:03:50 PM
It seems appropriate to have  a dedicated thread to COVID 19, given it's a worldwide event.
So here it is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 12, 2020, 07:44:49 PM
I just wanna work from home next week so I can play video games most of the day. Would be a blessing in disguise.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 12, 2020, 08:11:25 PM
Quote from: greg on March 12, 2020, 07:44:49 PM
I just wanna work from home next week so I can play video games most of the day. Would be a blessing in disguise.

Oh, you think the whole thing will be done in a week's time? ::)
Not in a week, not in a month, and probably not not even in year's time...
This virus is here to stay. Normality will only be restored when the larger part of the world population has developed a certain level of immune response, either through recovery after infection or through inocculation with a vaccine.
Estimations are that during this "first wave" of the epidemic 40-70% of the world population will get infected.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 12, 2020, 08:22:43 PM
Quote from: Que on March 12, 2020, 08:11:25 PM
Oh, you think the whole thing will be done in a week's time? ::)
Not in a week, not in a month, and probably not not even in year's time...
This virus is here to stay. Normality will only be restored when the larger part of the world population has developed a certain level of immune response, either through recovery after infection or through inocculation with a vaccine.
Estimations are that during this "first wave" of the epidemic 40-70% of the world population will get infected.

Q
Forgot to add the word "starting" before "next week"...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 12, 2020, 08:55:11 PM
I'm all set for my food supply, but I'm worried about water*.  All the advisories say to have 3 weeks of water stored.  Assuming conditions get so bad that the water supply is shut off or undrinkable, I only have enough containers here at home for about 10 gallons of water.   

* OK, I admit I'm worried about the beer supply as well. 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arkiv on March 12, 2020, 09:14:42 PM
Was this virus created in laboratories?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 12, 2020, 09:26:12 PM
Quote from: epicous on March 12, 2020, 09:14:42 PM
Was this virus created in laboratories?

No. Wuhan has a virology lab, but there's a global consensus among scientists that this originated in nature - in some not yet fully understood way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 12, 2020, 10:30:18 PM
Re: Panic buying

My daughter has texted me that one of her former colleagues is stock-piling custard.
Sounds sensible to me.

Thank you Jeffrey (JBS not me) for starting this thread. I was going to do this myself but thought that people have probably had enough of new threads from me.

A lot of people are working from home. East Sussex where I live (famous last words) does not currently have any cases as far as I'm aware, although there is believed to be a big discrepancy between official confirmed cases and the real situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 12, 2020, 10:43:00 PM
Quote from: epicous on March 12, 2020, 09:14:42 PM
Was this virus created in laboratories?

I agree with Simon NZ although a friend contacted me yesterday pointing out that the American author Dean Koontz's novel 'The Eyes of Darkness' (1981) features a global pandemic breaking out in 2020 as a consequence of a biological weapon called 'Wuhan-400'!

https://www.india.com/lifestyle/did-authors-dean-koontz-and-sylvia-browne-really-predict-coronavirus-outbreak-back-in-1981-and-2008-3967957/

My school is staying open for now and lots of the children live abroad anyway. All the overseas school trips are cancelled. The UK governments is facing criticism for not going further, like the French or Irish for example, but I'm not sure that they are wrong and they seem to be following the advice of medical experts.

I was due to travel to Coventry today for a History examiner's meeting but that has been cancelled which I think is sensible.

Hope everyone here (GMG forum not just UK) keeps safe and well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 01:22:33 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 12, 2020, 10:43:00 PM
The UK governments is facing criticism for not going further, like the French or Irish for example, but I'm not sure that they are wrong and they seem to be following the advice of medical experts.



It's hard for me to believe that the UK is being uniquely clear sighted, and the rest of the world is confused. But it's possible.

I can't find anywhere any details of the model that the British government is using, so that I can understand their response. Surely this must be in the public domain.

I haven't checked, but ditto for the (opposed?) model that the French government is using.

Que -- is there a united EC approach to this, a set of policies which give guidelines to all EU countries about (for example) when to close schools, restrict travel etc? Or is each country using a different model and following different objectives?

I would have thought that openness would be a good thing on this sort of situation, just to get the buy in of the people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 13, 2020, 01:27:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 01:22:33 AM
What I can't find anywhere is any details of the model that the British government is using, so that I can understand their response. Surely this must be in the public domain.

I haven't checked, but ditto for the (opposed?) model that the French government is using.

Que -- is there a united EC approach to this, a set of policies which give guidelines to all EU countries about (for example) when to close schools, restrict travel etc? Or is each country using a different model and following different objectives?
Interesting. I'm not sure what, if any, model they are following. I think they are just going by the advice of the Govt's Chief Medical Officer. The News today say that the majority of the people need to get the virus in order to build up 'herd immunity' otherwise it will keep coming back every year. Not a nice thought though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on March 13, 2020, 01:32:49 AM
A federal state like Germany has trouble getting 16 states and the federal goverment to take the same or similar measures, so I am pretty sure the EU will not be able to streamline measures and reactions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 01:33:02 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 13, 2020, 01:27:47 AM
Interesting. I'm not sure what, if any, model they are following. I think they are just going by the advice of the Govt's Chief Medical Officer. The News today say that the majority of the people need to get the virus in order to build up 'herd immunity' otherwise it will keep coming back every year. Not a nice thought though.

Sure, but what I want to see is the thinking, the details of the thinking, which has led to the Govt's Chief Medical Officer's advice. Which may or may not be consistent with the details of the thinking which lead to the French Government's health minister's advice . . . The devil's in the detail.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 01:33:53 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on March 13, 2020, 01:32:49 AM
A federal state like Germany has trouble getting 16 states and the federal goverment to take the same or similar measures, so I am pretty sure the EU will not be able to streamline measures and reactions.

That's extraordinary in a situation like this. Very bad.

Presumably everyone will agree on objectives (minimise deaths . . .) and the biology remains the same wherever you are, though clearly the health infrastructure, demographics, geography etc doesn't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 01:54:53 AM
Here's something with a bit of detail about the model

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51858987
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 13, 2020, 02:41:04 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on March 13, 2020, 01:32:49 AM
A federal state like Germany has trouble getting 16 states and the federal goverment to take the same or similar measures, so I am pretty sure the EU will not be able to streamline measures and reactions.
Same here in Spain. Each autonomous region has the authority to act how it sees fit. Only yesterday did the Prime Minister step in and issue recommendations applicable to the whole country (now that the Madrid region is severly affected, and activity here is coming to an almost complete stanstill).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 13, 2020, 03:00:57 AM
The aptly named "Stay the f*ck home" campaign is getting traction here in Czech Rep. Our government has shut down schools, gyms, concert halls and other public places + restaurants and bars must close after 8pm. I'm glad people are finally coming to their senses – Italy serves as a dire warning.

"Act as if you're infected and don't want to pass it on. Not as if you're trying to avoid being infected" is the best piece of advice I've encountered so far.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 13, 2020, 03:11:40 AM
Quote from: epicous on March 12, 2020, 09:14:42 PM
Was this virus created in laboratories?

To my understanding the cause of this outbreak was inadequate hygieny regulations regarding live animal markets in China. Different animals are kept above each other in cages so that the animals below other animals are exposed to the feaces and viruses are transmitted. If China doesn't fix this, the World can expect a new pandemic every 10 years or so...  :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 13, 2020, 05:07:19 AM
Quote from: epicous on March 12, 2020, 09:14:42 PM
Was this virus created in laboratories?

No, but certain conspiracy theorists are fond to think so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 13, 2020, 05:12:56 AM
When Gov. Baker declared the state of emergency in Mass. on Tuesday, I decided that I would go out only for therapy and church. As a good precaution (most of our parishioners are no longer young people) the church leadership cancelled last night's choir rehearsal and Sunday's service.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on March 13, 2020, 05:34:31 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 13, 2020, 03:11:40 AM
To my understanding the cause of this outbreak was inadequate hygieny regulations regarding live animal markets in China. Different animals are kept above each other in cages so that the animals below other animals are exposed to the feaces and viruses are transmitted. If China doesn't fix this, the World can expect a new pandemic every 10 years or so...  :-X


That's just what I understand and believe. I would just expand it a bit and say "wild caught animals", not livestock. Wild animals are a major cuisine item in China. According to a news item I saw recently, the Peoples' Congress (which I disremember the actual name of) banned the capture and sale of all wild animals. This is so anti-cultural that even in a closely regulated society like theirs, I can hardly imagine it being enforceable. It will just open up yet another black market opportunity. Still, the intent is good.

Maybe a bit less than 10 years?  SARS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, This shit: all within the last 10 years, IIRC. :-\

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 13, 2020, 05:58:17 AM
Spain's Prime Minister will make an institutional announcement soon (it was scheduled for 2:30 pm, but is now delayed). He's expected to declare the (constitutionally envisaged) "state of alarm" in the whole country. This "state of alarm" is one step short of a "state of exception ", but permits certain rights to be curtailed (e.g., restriction of movement, closure of borders, requisition of private property and intervention of factories, etc.).

At a local level, the Madrid City Hall has ordered the closure of all restaurants, bars and gyms (theatres, museums, libraries et al. were closed earlier this week).

Some towns in the province of Barcelona (around Igualada) are cordoned off, with no one allowed in or out, and residents asked to stay at home as much as possible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 13, 2020, 07:22:25 AM
Trump administration blocks states from using Medicaid to respond to coronavirus crisis (https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-03-13/trump-administration-blocks-states-use-medicaid-respond-coronavirus-crisis)

Yay.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 13, 2020, 07:34:09 AM

     (https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1545,w_2748,x_0,y_0/dpr_1.5/c_limit,w_1044/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1584108728/RTS35U8C_vjhsrh)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on March 13, 2020, 07:51:34 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 13, 2020, 07:34:09 AM
     (https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1545,w_2748,x_0,y_0/dpr_1.5/c_limit,w_1044/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1584108728/RTS35U8C_vjhsrh)

   

Wouldn't THAT be cool? :)

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 13, 2020, 08:01:04 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 13, 2020, 05:07:19 AM
No, but certain conspiracy theorists are fond to think so.
Probably because of the biolab that is like a block away from where the virus is thought to have originated. Seems like too much of a big coincidence.

Probably someone from the lab didn't wash their hands and walked over to the market and started touch food that other people would eat.

If it is a conspiracy then would it be the CCP trying to distract people from negative press (Hong Kong, Uyghurs)? It kinda worked but it wouldn't make sense comsidering how much it would backfire... or they really are that dumb?

(my bet is not on conspiracy, though)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 13, 2020, 08:16:18 AM
In music news, the CSO just cancelled all concerts until mid-April.

We were planning to go to New York and Philadelphia at the end of March, but we cancelled that about a week ago.

My life is otherwise not much affected, since I work at home and other than the trip, didn't have any upcoming events scheduled.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 13, 2020, 09:12:55 AM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on March 13, 2020, 07:51:34 AM
Wouldn't THAT be cool? :)

8)

     I didn't mean that, I meant something else. My mission is to destroy the myths of "belief makes truth" wherever I find them. They can be fatal.

"The evil in the world comes almost always from ignorance, and goodwill can cause as much damage as ill-will if it is not enlightened. People are more often good than bad, though in fact that is not the question. But they are more or less ignorant and this is what one calls vice or virtue, the most appalling vice being the ignorance that thinks it knows everything and which consequently authorizes itself to kill. The murderer's soul is blind, and there is no true goodness or fine love without the greatest possible degree of clear-sightedness."


― Albert Camus, The Plague
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 13, 2020, 09:39:40 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 12, 2020, 10:43:00 PM
I agree with Simon NZ although a friend contacted me yesterday pointing out that the American author Dean Koontz's novel 'The Eyes of Darkness' (1981) features a global pandemic breaking out in 2020 as a consequence of a biological weapon called 'Wuhan-400'!

https://www.india.com/lifestyle/did-authors-dean-koontz-and-sylvia-browne-really-predict-coronavirus-outbreak-back-in-1981-and-2008-3967957/

My school is staying open for now and lots of the children live abroad anyway. All the overseas school trips are cancelled. The UK governments is facing criticism for not going further, like the French or Irish for example, but I'm not sure that they are wrong and they seem to be following the advice of medical experts.

I was due to travel to Coventry today for a History examiner's meeting but that has been cancelled which I think is sensible.

Hope everyone here (GMG forum not just UK) keeps safe and well.

Epidemic outbreaks have long fascinated writers and Hollywood. Not to mention all the stories about Jews poisoning wells during the Great Plague, etc.

Koontz wrote his novel in 1981 and set the action (epidemic outbreak) in Gorki, Russia - the archenemy and bogeyman of the USA in the Reagan years. The novel was reedited in 1989 and the plot moved to Wuhan, China (Russia was fast going down and no longer as scary a global threat in the Gorbachev years). Why Wuhan? Divination? ESP? Fluke? In any case, the epidemic described by Koontz didn't look like what we have on our hands today. People died within 24 hours, etc.

To connect the dots (the missing link of the internet story), a 2008 page from a psychic's predictions was added to the story. This time the epidemic's description and timeline correspond to 2020 coronavirus.

IOW, to lend credence to the social media story, one has to believe in a book whose story is about another epidemic set in a different place, then transplanted to Wuhan, on top of adding a psychic's prediction. Pour in a few drops of toad drooling and let cook on a full moon night for best results.  >:D


https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coronavirus-koontz-book/partly-false-claima-1981-book-predicted-the-coronavirus-2019-outbreak-idUSKCN20M19I (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coronavirus-koontz-book/partly-false-claima-1981-book-predicted-the-coronavirus-2019-outbreak-idUSKCN20M19I)

Edited for typo
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brian on March 13, 2020, 11:17:41 AM
Quote from: André on March 13, 2020, 09:39:40 AM
Epidemic outbreaks have long fascinated writers and Hollywood. Not to mention all the stories about Jews poisoning eells during the Great Plague, etc.
The author Lawrence Wright just wrote a novel about an influenza outbreak - the book is scheduled to come out next month! He has a fascinating NY Times column today about seeing some of his plot points come true, but seeing others get disproven. In his novel, the virus hits Mecca during Ramadan and 3 million people are quarantined in Saudi Arabia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 13, 2020, 11:53:00 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 13, 2020, 03:11:40 AM
To my understanding the cause of this outbreak was inadequate hygieny regulations regarding live animal markets in China. Different animals are kept above each other in cages so that the animals below other animals are exposed to the feaces and viruses are transmitted. If China doesn't fix this, the World can expect a new pandemic every 10 years or so...  :-X
That's my understanding too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 13, 2020, 11:55:56 AM
Quote from: André on March 13, 2020, 09:39:40 AM
Epidemic outbreaks have long fascinated writers and Hollywood. Not to mention all the stories about Jews poisoning wells during the Great Plague, etc.

Koontz wrote his novel in 1981 and set the action (epidemic outbreak) in Gorki, Russia - the archenemy and bogeyman of the USA in the Reagan years. The novel was reedited in 1989 and the plot moved to Wuhan, China (Russia was fast going down and no longer as scary a global threat in the Gorbachev years). Why Wuhan? Divination? ESP? Fluke? In any case, the epidemic described by Koontz didn't look like what we have on our hands today. People died within 24 hours, etc.

To connect the dots (the missing link of the internet story), a 2008 page from a psychic's predictions was added to the story. This time the epidemic's description and timeline correspond to 2020 coronavirus.

IOW, to lend credence to the social media story, one has to believe in a book whose story is about another epidemic set in a different place, then transplanted to Wuhan, on top of adding a psychic's prediction. Pour in a few drops of toad drooling and let cook on a full moon night for best results.  >:D


https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coronavirus-koontz-book/partly-false-claima-1981-book-predicted-the-coronavirus-2019-outbreak-idUSKCN20M19I (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coronavirus-koontz-book/partly-false-claima-1981-book-predicted-the-coronavirus-2019-outbreak-idUSKCN20M19I)

Edited for typo
Good points André.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM
The effect here in Australia is minimal with three reported deaths (all over 80 years old) and sporadic cases being detected around the country. However, big events like the F1 Grand Prix have been cancelled and sports matches are being played in front of empty stadiums. The State premiers met with the PM and the country's Chief Medical Officer yesterday and while a ban has been put in place on gatherings of more than 500 (where did they get that figure from?) people, Scott Morrison has urged people to go on with their lives as normal and I agree with him.

That said, the Covid 19 'pandemic' has made me think of a number of questions that nobody has asked so far.

The first is one that might horrify many of you. Coronavirus, unless it's severe, is self reporting. If you've got it and the symptoms are minor (like a mild cold or just feeling a bit down) how many of you would actually go to get it checked out? I would say less than 10% because "why bother the doctor with something that's probably not Covid19 but just a bit of a cold". (Some of you don't have anywhere to go anyway). If this surmise is correct then there are probably a hell of a lot of people walking around with this virus who don't know it. Had a bit of a scratchy throat lately? Feeling physically a bit down but able to carry on? Is it coronavirus? It might be, who knows?

The second one sums up human nature. Your workmate has been diagnosed with it and you've been asked to self-isolate for 14 days. OK, you have a partner and three children. Do they self isolate as well? I suspect not.

What is the actual risk of death from Covid 19 and what are the implications? The graph below shows that the most vulnerable are those in 70+ age group who have an overall 24% chance (1 in 4) of dying if (and IF is the operative word) they contract the virus.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

There are other graphs involving comorbidity etc from this site. But the way I read those graphs is that it just looks like another flu season and not as serious as ones we've had in the past. The big difference this time around is that young children (comorbidity aside) have not been affected.

So are we shutting down the world just because we have come across something new? The death toll from the 'influenza season' in Australia last year was about the average - around 1300 people. Covid 19 has been here for two months now and we stand at 3. Or, is there something about this virus that our governments are not telling us?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 13, 2020, 02:53:00 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM
[...]
So are we shutting down the world just because we have come across something new? The death toll from the 'influenza season' in Australia last year was about the average - around 1300 people. Covid 19 has been here for two months now and we stand at 3. Or, is there something about this virus that our governments are not telling us?

Trump tweeded something like the 'relax, people' message last Monday, too. Two weeks ago he predicted "this will be over in April."
And here (Netherlands), there were medical specialists also claiming that COVID-19 was nothing but a heavy flu, especially dangerous for the old and the weak (which is bad enough already, do not get me wrong).
And then, around Wednesday/Thursday, suddenly the tone completely changed, almost everywhere. I did mention to a colleague that I found that rather weird. I mean, Boris Johnson's words almost sounded like a funeral speech, Macron's speech was very serious, and our (Dutch) PM, who was also relatively relaxed until Wednesday, has stopped laughing altogether. Which is very noticeable, cuz he laughs a lot, normally. Of course the situation in Italy went from alarming to extremely alarming indeed during the week, so that could be the cause.

I really feel for the people who work in healthcare. They try to help as much as they can and take the highest risks. I read some reports here that many of them are very tired already. And this thing has only just started...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 13, 2020, 03:17:13 PM
The self imposed isolation is meant to disrupt the transmission of the virus. Like going from an unbroken line to some kind of morse code. It will slow the number of cases on a day to day basis (flattening the bell curve) so the health system is not overwhelmed by a sudden peak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 13, 2020, 04:50:48 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM
The effect here in Australia is minimal with three reported deaths (all over 80 years old) and sporadic cases being detected around the country. However, big events like the F1 Grand Prix have been cancelled and sports matches are being played in front of empty stadiums. The State premiers met with the PM and the country's Chief Medical Officer yesterday and while a ban has been put in place on gatherings of more than 500 (where did they get that figure from?) people, Scott Morrison has urged people to go on with their lives as normal and I agree with him.

That said, the Covid 19 'pandemic' has made me think of a number of questions that nobody has asked so far.

The first is one that might horrify many of you. Coronavirus, unless it's severe, is self reporting. If you've got it and the symptoms are minor (like a mild cold or just feeling a bit down) how many of you would actually go to get it checked out? I would say less than 10% because "why bother the doctor with something that's probably not Covid19 but just a bit of a cold". (Some of you don't have anywhere to go anyway). If this surmise is correct then there are probably a hell of a lot of people walking around with this virus who don't know it. Had a bit of a scratchy throat lately? Feeling physically a bit down but able to carry on? Is it coronavirus? It might be, who knows?

The second one sums up human nature. Your workmate has been diagnosed with it and you've been asked to self-isolate for 14 days. OK, you have a partner and three children. Do they self isolate as well? I suspect not.

What is the actual risk of death from Covid 19 and what are the implications? The graph below shows that the most vulnerable are those in 70+ age group who have an overall 24% chance (1 in 4) of dying if (and IF is the operative word) they contract the virus.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

There are other graphs involving comorbidity etc from this site. But the way I read those graphs is that it just looks like another flu season and not as serious as ones we've had in the past. The big difference this time around is that young children (comorbidity aside) have not been affected.

So are we shutting down the world just because we have come across something new? The death toll from the 'influenza season' in Australia last year was about the average - around 1300 people. Covid 19 has been here for two months now and we stand at 3. Or, is there something about this virus that our governments are not telling us?

The basic problem with Covid19 is that, being a newly discovered virus, nobody seems to have natural immunity to it, and there is no vaccine for it now.  So it can spread much more easily than the normal flu virus. You just have to hope you get a milder strain of it if you get it.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 13, 2020, 05:14:00 PM
Quote from: Roy Bland on March 13, 2020, 04:32:41 PM
A warning in a language similar to English
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYxLSpUZEuU

Prime example of how a very serious matter becomes unintentionally comical... :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 13, 2020, 08:42:26 PM
I think like a lot of these outbreaks, the most important thing is to take personal precautions. In this case, wash your hands regularly (I hope people here and elsewhere do this anyway), practice good hygiene, and always know your surroundings and, more importantly, the people in those surroundings. I think there has been one case reported where I live, but by the way the media makes it sound, you'd think this was the apocalypse. I work in retail and I've never seen so many people scrambling to buy toilet paper, hand sanitizers, antibacterial wipes, water, bread, etc. Personally, I'm not going to live my life in fear and I think one of the worst things people can do in this kind of situation is to panic. This only escalates the problem. The perfect scenario would be for people just to stay at home, but this isn't going to happen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 09:06:47 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM

The second one sums up human nature. Your workmate has been diagnosed with it and you've been asked to self-isolate for 14 days. OK, you have a partner and three children. Do they self isolate as well? I suspect not.


At some point very soon the UK the government is going to ask well people in vulnerable groups to « cocoon » themselves - which, as far as I can see, is a sort of voluntary house arrest. They may be asked to do this for many weeks.  It will involve a significant lifestyle change and I'm sure it will be very unpleasant for them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 13, 2020, 09:10:13 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM

What is the actual risk of death from Covid 19 and what are the implications?


The risk of death is increased if you don't  the proper care if you develop pneumonia. And that's the problem. There may well be so many people presenting with serious complications of the virus that the health system can't offer them all the right level of care.

That's why, I'm the UK, part of the strategy involves ensuring that vulnerable groups do not catch the disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 14, 2020, 06:12:51 AM

The Great TP Run...

(https://i.imgflip.com/3shleu.jpg)

(https://i.imgflip.com/3sdpty.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 06:33:40 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM
a ban has been put in place on gatherings of more than 500 (where did they get that figure from?)

In my own country it's more than 100, which begs the question what's the difference between 99 and 101?  ;D

QuoteHad a bit of a scratchy throat lately? Feeling physically a bit down but able to carry on?

Precisely and exactly my symptoms during end of Januay/beginning of February. I've had 38/39 C fever for four days in a row; for a whole night I've felt as if I had a razor blade glued to my hroat; I could barely eat anything and I was extremely weak physically for a whole week; I was not even sure if I could drive to the apointment with my oto-rhino-laryngologist (eventually I did, better than expected). I needed a full week of antibiotics in order to get cured and a whole month afterwards to get rid of coughing. This was the worst flu I've ever experienced. Was it Covid-19? Highly unlikely.

I'm not saying the pandemic should be taken lightly, but I'm absolutely convinced that mass panic and hysteria are worse than the virus itself.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 14, 2020, 06:51:57 AM
Quote from: André on March 14, 2020, 06:12:51 AM
The Great TP Run...

(https://i.imgflip.com/3shleu.jpg)

(https://i.imgflip.com/3sdpty.jpg)

;D Haha! So true!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 07:34:35 AM
Why is it that the mass media focus almost exclusively on the negatives and they almost never stress the positives?

"The mortality rate is 10 times higher than that of the seasonal flu". True, but given that the latter is 0.1% it follows that the former is 1%, which means that he overwhelming majority of people who got Covid-19 will survive alright.

Related: a flu --- any flu, be it seasonal or Covid-19 --- kills only people with previous and serious medical conditions. A person who has no, or minor medical conditions, will most likely survive the infection.

"There is no known antidote to Covid-19". Which begs the question how did all the people who are now cured of it survived? Either they did nothing at all (in which case their natural immunity was strong enough to annihilate the virus) or they were treated with whatever medication is known as being effective against other types of coronaviruses (in which case we must assume that it work against Covid-19 as well)

Just earlier today on Euronews I've heard a Hong Kong virusologist stating that this damn Covid-19 is a virus sharing many, if not most, of his features with many other coronaviruses which have been studied, so the most probable reason for its appearance is natural evolution rather than leak from a laboratory. While not completely excluding the latter hypothesis, I tend to agree with him. So far, so good. Shortly thereafter I've heard on a Romanian TV station that the European Center for Disease Prevention stated that the Covid-19's survival time on solid surfaces is still unknown. Good grief! (1) If Covid-19 shares many features with many other coronaviruses which have been studied, then for my engineer mind it follows logically that its survival time on solid surfaces must be about the same time as that of the others, give or take; (2) in AD 2020 is it that hard to establish how long a virus which people can be tested against survives on solid surfaces?

The same virusologist mentioned above stated that it's wrong to be optimistic about the Covid-19 pandemic subsiding by April due to warming, because in the Southern hemsphere it's going to be colder (coming winter) and the cycle will go on. While this is true in abstract, considering that right now the vast, overwhelming majority of the infections are reported in the Northern hemisphere, the coming summer will most likely subside the Northern hemisphere pandemic. To my engineer mind it's highly unlikely that beyond April or May the Southern hemisphere will experience the same level of emergency as the Northern hemisphere right now.

Last but not least, let's put the whole thing in a philosophical, metaphysical or religious perspective. 100% of those who get Covid-19 will die: a (very) few of them because it will aggravate their preexisting medical conditions, the vast majority of them because sooner or later, for one reason or another different from Covid-19, all people die. 100% of those who will not get Covid-19 will die, because sooner or later, for one reason or another different from Covid-19, all people die.

Carpe diem!

I wish all GMGers and all their loved ones and acquaintances stay safe and healthy!



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 07:35:32 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 13, 2020, 02:28:54 PM
The effect here in Australia is minimal with three reported deaths (all over 80 years old) and sporadic cases being detected around the country. However, big events like the F1 Grand Prix have been cancelled and sports matches are being played in front of empty stadiums. The State premiers met with the PM and the country's Chief Medical Officer yesterday and while a ban has been put in place on gatherings of more than 500 (where did they get that figure from?) people, Scott Morrison has urged people to go on with their lives as normal and I agree with him.

That said, the Covid 19 'pandemic' has made me think of a number of questions that nobody has asked so far.

The first is one that might horrify many of you. Coronavirus, unless it's severe, is self reporting. If you've got it and the symptoms are minor (like a mild cold or just feeling a bit down) how many of you would actually go to get it checked out? I would say less than 10% because "why bother the doctor with something that's probably not Covid19 but just a bit of a cold". (Some of you don't have anywhere to go anyway). If this surmise is correct then there are probably a hell of a lot of people walking around with this virus who don't know it. Had a bit of a scratchy throat lately? Feeling physically a bit down but able to carry on? Is it coronavirus? It might be, who knows?

The second one sums up human nature. Your workmate has been diagnosed with it and you've been asked to self-isolate for 14 days. OK, you have a partner and three children. Do they self isolate as well? I suspect not.

What is the actual risk of death from Covid 19 and what are the implications? The graph below shows that the most vulnerable are those in 70+ age group who have an overall 24% chance (1 in 4) of dying if (and IF is the operative word) they contract the virus.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

There are other graphs involving comorbidity etc from this site. But the way I read those graphs is that it just looks like another flu season and not as serious as ones we've had in the past. The big difference this time around is that young children (comorbidity aside) have not been affected.

So are we shutting down the world just because we have come across something new? The death toll from the 'influenza season' in Australia last year was about the average - around 1300 people. Covid 19 has been here for two months now and we stand at 3. Or, is there something about this virus that our governments are not telling us?

Thread winner so far!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 14, 2020, 08:04:52 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 13, 2020, 08:42:26 PM
I think like a lot of these outbreaks, the most important thing is to take personal precautions. In this case, wash your hands regularly (I hope people here and elsewhere do this anyway), practice good hygiene, and always know your surroundings and, more importantly, the people in those surroundings. I think there has been one case reported where I live, but by the way the media makes it sound, you'd think this was the apocalypse. I work in retail and I've never seen so many people scrambling to buy toilet paper, hand sanitizers, antibacterial wipes, water, bread, etc. Personally, I'm not going to live my life in fear and I think one of the worst things people can do in this kind of situation is to panic. This only escalates the problem. The perfect scenario would be for people just to stay at home, but this isn't going to happen.

The vexatious thing about the upshot of the Panic Buying for me is, that as someone relatively housebound while on disability, shopping becomes a little problematic in a way that I consider fsairly unnecessary.  My needs WRT toilet paper and water are not great, but they are greater than zero.

I did manage to find TP at CVS yesterday, and sufficient water at Whole Foods today, so I suffer no unease.  /Bu,r since there was none of either at Stop 'n' Shop yesterday,  I have been fortunate in my foraging choices.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 14, 2020, 08:32:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 07:34:35 AM
Shortly thereafter I've heard on a Romanian TV station that the European Center for Disease Prevention stated that the Covid-19's survival time on solid surfaces is still unknown.

Virus can remain viable "in aerosols up to 3 hours, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel" a Princeton study awaiting peer review has found https://t.co/8AEaFd230k
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 08:36:21 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 14, 2020, 08:32:05 AM
Virus can remain viable "in aerosols up to 3 hours, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel" a Princeton study awaiting peer review has found https://t.co/8AEaFd230k

Thanks, really helpful. Does the study also mention how these data compare to other coronaviruses? I ask because it's really important to put things in perspective (see the "10 times more deadly than the seasonal flu" thing).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 14, 2020, 09:17:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 08:36:21 AM
Thanks, really helpful. Does the study also mention how these data compare to other coronaviruses? I ask because it's really important to put things in perspective (see the "10 times more deadly than the seasonal flu" thing).

The study compares SARS Co-V 1 (the old SARS virus from the epidemic 2002 - 2003) with SARS Co-V-2 (the new SARS virus which causes COVID 19), but there is no comparison with the corona-vira which cause common cold.

The article is just to go to here:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.09.20033217v1.full.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on March 14, 2020, 09:27:32 AM
This virus is a scoundrel.

It starts slowly, almost unnoticeable.

In Italy we had 3 cases from the end of January, and so they were for almost one months. Big news on the newspapers, all places where they stayed were sanitized, those people were immediately quarantined, but really nobody cared of them. We all thought that what was happening in China couldn't happen to us, to our lives.
Then, from February 21, things started getting bad. Suddenly. Nobody knows really why.
Now they say that, possibly, this virus was already here since a couple of months, but unless you look for it, you never find it. In hospitals they only noticed an unusual larger number of very old people, suffering from other deseases, dying from pneumonia, but you know, in winter that could happen.
So in February 21 they found 17 new cases, the day after the cases were 79, the day after 152, then 229, then 322 and so on...
Full history here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Italy

We immediately quarantined an large area at just 70km from my home. That week most of the people (including myself) used to say what some of you are stll saying: it's just a bit more severe flu, why shut down an entire piece of country, this only creates panic, just relax and follow your normal life.
How wrong we were!

Now we are all quarantined, we have nearly 20 thousands cases (still growing at a 20% daily rate) and more that one thousands deaths. Yes, most (but not all) of them are from old people. You know why? We have almost run out of the intensive care units in hospitals, so the young gets the ventilation, the old with other deseases gets the standard therapy only. Now we all understand very well why in Wuhan they built new hospitals in few days. But we are not in China...

Please, don't be superficial, don't make the same mistakes we made. This virus is a scoundrel. The sooner you shut down everything, the better is for you and your country.




   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 14, 2020, 09:46:27 AM
Caro Gio, it's good to hear from you, and I hope that you and those dear to you are well. I fully identify with your message, as we in Spain (and particularly in Madrid) are seeing what you describe now unfolding right before our eyes. We are being asked by the authorities to stay in our homes, and only go out to buy food or other essentials. Fortunately, it seems that the vast majority of the population is heeding this advice (belatedly, perhaps, as until only two nights ago people were still going to bars, restaurants and outdoor terraces to have a drink as if nothing were happening). Now the city is deserted (all shops—except food, chemists and some other exceptions—, restaurants, bars, gyms, theatre, museums, everything in fact, are closed for at least two weeks). Fortunately, there is no shortage of foodstuffs in the shops, and the general atmosphere is one of quiet, disciplined resignation. Those who can (like me) work from home, and avoid going out unless absolutely necessary. More stringent measures (complete lockdown?) are expected to be announced later today by the government. To a great extent, we have learned from what has happened in Italy (even if it has taken us probably one week too long to learn the lesson).

Ti auguro molto incoraggiamento, e ti mando un grande abbraccio.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 14, 2020, 09:57:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 07:34:35 AM
Why is it that the mass media focus almost exclusively on the negatives and they almost never stress the positives?

"The mortality rate is 10 times higher than that of the seasonal flu". True, but given that the latter is 0.1% it follows that the former is 1%, which means that he overwhelming majority of people who got Covid-19 will survive alright.

Related: a flu --- any flu, be it seasonal or Covid-19 --- kills only people with previous and serious medical conditions. A person who has no, or minor medical conditions, will most likely survive the infection.

"There is no known antidote to Covid-19". Which begs the question how did all the people who are now cured of it survived? Either they did nothing at all (in which case their natural immunity was strong enough to annihilate the virus) or they were treated with whatever medication is known as being effective against other types of coronaviruses (in which case we must assume that it work against Covid-19 as well)

Just earlier today on Euronews I've heard a Hong Kong virusologist stating that this damn Covid-19 is a virus sharing many, if not most, of his features with many other coronaviruses which have been studied, so the most probable reason for its appearance is natural evolution rather than leak from a laboratory. While not completely excluding the latter hypothesis, I tend to agree with him. So far, so good. Shortly thereafter I've heard on a Romanian TV station that the European Center for Disease Prevention stated that the Covid-19's survival time on solid surfaces is still unknown. Good grief! (1) If Covid-19 shares many features with many other coronaviruses which have been studied, then for my engineer mind it follows logically that its survival time on solid surfaces must be about the same time as that of the others, give or take; (2) in AD 2020 is it that hard to establish how long a virus which people can be tested against survives on solid surfaces?

The same virusologist mentioned above stated that it's wrong to be optimistic about the Covid-19 pandemic subsiding by April due to warming, because in the Southern hemsphere it's going to be colder (coming winter) and the cycle will go on. While this is true in abstract, considering that right now the vast, overwhelming majority of the infections are reported in the Northern hemisphere, the coming summer will most likely subside the Northern hemisphere pandemic. To my engineer mind it's highly unlikely that beyond April or May the Southern hemisphere will experience the same level of emergency as the Northern hemisphere right now.

Last but not least, let's put the whole thing in a philosophical, metaphysical or religious perspective. 100% of those who get Covid-19 will die: a (very) few of them because it will aggravate their preexisting medical conditions, the vast majority of them because sooner or later, for one reason or another different from Covid-19, all people die. 100% of those who will not get Covid-19 will die, because sooner or later, for one reason or another different from Covid-19, all people die.

Carpe diem!

I wish all GMGers and all their loved ones and acquaintances stay safe and healthy!

the problem is that there will be a lot of people with serious complications. This is a problem because the health systems of the world can't take care of them all, and so some of them, many of them, will die.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 14, 2020, 10:19:55 AM
In Belgium, bars and cafés closed to business for 3 weeks as of yesterday night. But not before a last pint !

Belgians understand carpe diem in their own way. Yesterday evening in Brussels, police had to remove revellers from bars well past midnight...

(https://moustique.cdnartwhere.eu/sites/default/files/vdd_lockdown-6.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 10:32:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 14, 2020, 09:57:34 AM
the problem is that there will be a lot of people with serious complications.

Which means there were already a lot of people with serious medical conditions before Covid-19 ever start spreading.

Quote
This is a problem because the health systems of the world can't take care of them all, and so some of them, many of them, will die.

The real problem is that the modern man lives in a comfort that a king of yore could have only dreamed of and therefore they think they're immortal, or at least that death is an uncommon ocurrence. But you're very fond of JS Bach, though, so you should be immune to this delusion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:28:03 AM
Quote from: André on March 14, 2020, 10:19:55 AM
In Belgium, bars and cafés closed to business for 3 weeks as of yesterday night. But not before a last pint !

Belgians understand carpe diem in their own way. Yesterday evening in Brussels, police had to remove revellers from bars well past midnight...

(https://moustique.cdnartwhere.eu/sites/default/files/vdd_lockdown-6.jpg)

Wise guys and chicks, those Belgians! If we're going to die, and we're all going to die, then at least let's die happy and cheerful.  :D

Seriously now, I'm all for obeying strictly the rules and regulations the authorities impose, they are for our own good. But I'm also all against inducing panic and hysteria,

I'm willing to take a bet: past April (May at most) the whole damn thing will be over in Europe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 14, 2020, 11:28:51 AM
The New Normal in Boston: Everything is Canceled (https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2020/03/13/boston-canceled-coronavirus/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 14, 2020, 11:41:43 AM
I'm beginning to see little signs of civilizational slippage, i.e. things that indicate people are dealing with an unprecedented crisis. My local library just closed for the duration, and today they sent me an overdue notice, indicating that the items I checked out are overdue. The due date is listed as 1962. This has never happened to me before.

I wondered how large a fine I would have to pay, but their website contained this notice:

"You may have received a message saying that your items are overdue...by about 58 years. Obviously, this is not correct (unless you have invented time travel, in which case: we have some questions). We think that the issue occurred when we were resetting due dates. We've put in a ticket with our tech company."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 14, 2020, 11:44:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 08:36:21 AMit's really important to put things in perspective

Yes. (https://twitter.com/NaomiOhReally/status/1238868163208634371)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 14, 2020, 11:46:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 14, 2020, 09:57:34 AM
the problem is that there will be a lot of people with serious complications. This is a problem because the health systems of the world can't take care of them all, and so some of them, many of them, will die.

One basic epidemiological estimate I've seen said that in the US 200 million could be infected and 1.5 million could be expected to die. To put that in perspective, there are 2.8 million deaths per year in the US. And while it is true that the elderly or people with pre-existing medical conditions are most vulnerable, people in good health can also die. It would be on par with the 1918 pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 14, 2020, 11:47:18 AM
Governments across the world are advised by experts and are taking drastic measures, so yes I am taking this very seriously indeed. It is predicted that in the UK 80% of the population will be infected, the symptoms for some will be so mild that they will not even realise they have it, however, 1% are predicted to die, and of course for those aged over 65 the % of deaths shoots up. The affect on stock markets and businesses, large and small, worldwide is catastrophic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 14, 2020, 11:50:35 AM
     I went to the movies today. The ticket seller said there are no plans to close in the immediate future.

     I'm not sure what constitutes panic in public behavior. We are all supposed to not do it, but I'm a little unsure of what I'm not supposed to be doing.

     As for panic as emotion, that's my business. It's my pandemic, I'll cry if I want to......You would cry too if it blah blah etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:50:46 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 14, 2020, 11:44:49 AM
Yes. (https://twitter.com/NaomiOhReally/status/1238868163208634371)

Twitter is not my thing. Can you summarize it, please?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 14, 2020, 11:52:27 AM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 14, 2020, 11:41:43 AM
I'm beginning to see little signs of civilizational slippage, i.e. things that indicate people are dealing with an unprecedented crisis. My local library just closed for the duration, and today they sent me an overdue notice, indicating that the items I checked out are overdue. The due date is listed as 1962. This has never happened to me before.

I wondered how large a fine I would have to pay, but their website contained this notice:

"You may have received a message saying that your items are overdue...by about 58 years. Obviously, this is not correct (unless you have invented time travel, in which case: we have some questions). We think that the issue occurred when we were resetting due dates. We've put in a ticket with our tech company."

Hah! Book to the Future!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on March 14, 2020, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 14, 2020, 09:46:27 AM
Caro Gio, it's good to hear from you, and I hope that you and those dear to you are well. I fully identify with your message, as we in Spain (and particularly in Madrid) are seeing what you describe now unfolding right before our eyes. We are being asked by the authorities to stay in our homes, and only go out to buy food or other essentials. Fortunately, it seems that the vast majority of the population is heeding this advice (belatedly, perhaps, as until only two nights ago people were still going to bars, restaurants and outdoor terraces to have a drink as if nothing were happening). Now the city is deserted (all shops—except food, chemists and some other exceptions—, restaurants, bars, gyms, theatre, museums, everything in fact, are closed for at least two weeks). Fortunately, there is no shortage of foodstuffs in the shops, and the general atmosphere is one of quiet, disciplined resignation. Those who can (like me) work from home, and avoid going out unless absolutely necessary. More stringent measures (complete lockdown?) are expected to be announced later today by the government. To a great extent, we have learned from what has happened in Italy (even if it has taken us probably one week too long to learn the lesson).

Ti auguro molto incoraggiamento, e ti mando un grande abbraccio.

Caro Rafael, I've been following with concern what is happening in Europe and in the rest of the world. You in Madrid/Spain have been doing very well in my (new) opinion (as I said before I wasn't worried that much till when I saw the numbers growing exponentially, and when I started witnessing what is happening in hospitals here - my brother is a medical doctor).

Unfortunately some politicians in Europe (the continent) have been starting playing with their country's health system and with human lives. So terribly stupid.

Take care of yourself and your family. We will be over all that soon. In Italy people are preparing a sort of flag with a rainbow and the motto "Tutto andrà bene".

Un grande abbraccio anche a te!

Now I go celebrating my wedding anniversary (22 years) with a romantic dinner al home with my wife. We'll have "orata alla ligure" (see bream ligurian style) with olives, pine seeds, thyme, olive oil, garlic and potatoes  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:58:39 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 14, 2020, 11:47:18 AM
Governments across the world are advised by experts and are taking drastic measures, so yes I am taking this very seriously indeed. It is predicted that in the UK 80% of the population will be infected,

I think the figure is greatly exaggerated.

Quotethe symptoms for some will be so mild that they will not even realise they have it,

That's valid for every seasonal flu in every country in every hemisphere.

Quote1% are predicted to die,

Oh, the horror, the horror!

Quoteof course for those aged over 65 the % of deaths shoots up.

That is certainly true --- because, and only because, they're most likely to have pre-existing life-threatening conditions.

Quote
The affect on stock markets and businesses, large and small, worldwide is catastrophic.

It could most certainly be catastrophic if mass media and governments alike will keep spreading and inducing mass panic and hysteria.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 12:00:46 PM
Quote from: GioCar on March 14, 2020, 11:56:14 AM
Now I go celebrating my wedding anniversary (22 years) with a romantic dinner al home with my wife. We'll have "orata alla ligure" (see bream ligurian style) with olives, pine seeds, thyme, olive oil, garlic and potatoes  :)

Many happy returns! What wine will you have?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 14, 2020, 12:50:14 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:50:46 AM
Twitter is not my thing. Can you summarize it, please?

« Bergamo newspaper obituary from February 9: 1 page
Same newspaper's obituary from March 13: 10 pages.
A simple flu. Thanks. »
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 14, 2020, 01:46:58 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 14, 2020, 11:52:27 AM
Hah! Book to the Future!

Absolutely. Book a journey to the future.  :)
Maybe this corona virus is gone by then.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 01:55:24 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:28:03 AM
Wise guys and chicks, those Belgians! If we're going to die, and we're all going to die, then at least let's die happy and cheerful.  :D

Seriously now, I'm all for obeying strictly the rules and regulations the authorities impose, they are for our own good. But I'm also all against inducing panic and hysteria,

I'm willing to take a bet: past April (May at most) the whole damn thing will be over in Europe.
[...]

If I understand correctly, one of them cheerful Belgian partygoers kissed a female TV reporter while she was doing a live broadcast from the street.
The police is now searching for him, because the broadcast company wants to sue him for sexual harrassment and endangering their employee's health.

I'm not against some joking around a bit, but I think this virus is a serious matter, with the death tolls in China and Italy (for instance) as sad proofs. I saw an Italian doctor today on the telly, who was telling about old people dying in hospitals, completely left alone, because their family wasn't able/allowed to come over and because the medical staff was just too busy helping people who could still be saved.

I won't take your bet either, I'm not a medic and I just don't know when this will end. I do know though that I myself don't have a steady job (which ends on May 1st also) and that there are already companies beginning to fire temporary staff, or stop extending their contracts. I'm not sure about other countries, but normally 'just a heavy flu with a few deaths' doesn't lead to this. Today was a sunny day around here, but in my suburb the streets and parks were empty. No fun.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 01:58:06 PM
Wonkette keeping you informed:

What Are Tinfoil Hatters Saying About Coronavirus? Oh, Just Normal Stuff. (https://www.wonkette.com/tin-foil-hat-coronavirus)

"Since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, there have been conspiracy theories about the coronavirus. But this week, as the CDC declared it a pandemic and people are really taking it seriously, extremely stupid conspiracy theories about the coronavirus have started to spread like, well, the coronavirus.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, most of these conspiracy theories have started in and around the QAnon community, as it is filled with people who simply do not believe in coincidences. Or, really, in anything in the whole world happening that is not related to their idiot conspiracy theory.

Even schools closing in order to keep children safe presents an opportunity for them to wax poetic about what that could mean for those who kill children in order to harvest their adrenal glands to produce adrenochrome, a substance that can be manufactured in a lab by oxidizing epinephrine, in order to get high off of it. You cannot, in fact, get high off of adrenochrome.

"If 'these people are sick' means adrenochrome withdrawal, then keeping children at home will prevent the elite from feeding."

So let's just dive in, shall we?

Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson, whom we all love, have tested positive for COVID-19 in Australia where Hanks is currently filming a movie about Elvis Presley in which he plays Presley's manager, Colonel Tom Parker — they are in isolation and are so far doing OK. That's about it on that story on the normal news front.

Hanks, over the last few years, has been the subject of a super ridiculous conspiracy theory perpetuated by a lady named Sara Ruth Ashcraft who claims she was Tom Hanks's brainwashed sex slave and that he, her parents and a whole bunch of other celebrities belong to a cult called the Hivites. Hillary Clinton, obviously, is involved in this as well, because isn't she always? Anyway, it's partially because of this that his diagnosis has sent the tin foil hat brigade into overdrive.

Randy Quaid seems to think his diagnosis is a hoax perpetuated by none other than Michelle Obama. Why? Who knows!

This guy on Reddit's r/Conspiracy thinks Hanks used his Golden Globes acceptance speech to send messages to the elite about coronavirus, and to telegraph the day and time he and Rita Wilson would be announcing they got it.

Also, according to some stupid people on Twitter, Hanks's most recent tweet confirming he and Wilson are OK was actually a plea for adrenochrome, and Ellen DeGeneres answered their prayers? Or something?

Also Ellen DeGeneres's decision to film her show without a studio audience — coupled with an obvious joke about having a warrant out for her arrest in the state of Florida — sent the Anons into conspiracy overdrive.

Speaking of arrests, both Firefighter Prophet Mark Taylor and Liz "We Don't Want To Be Mean To Her Because She Actually Does Have Brain Damage" Crokin are claiming the coronavirus is merely a coverup for all of the mass arrests that Q has been promising them the last several years.

Via RightWingWatch:

"I do believe that when these mass arrests happen that we will be in martial law for our own safety," Crokin said. "I believe that the coronavirus, which the president of the United States and many doctors have said is no more serious than the flu, is the cover to put the country into lockdown—just like Italy is in lockdown—to possibly declare martial law, get people off the streets, keep them in their homes, so they're safe so when the military and the National Guard sweeps in and conducts these mass arrests, it is done in a manner where people are kept safe."

"Since 2017, Q has been talking about these mass arrests, and Q has also been talking about how when these mass arrests happen, there will probably be many days of darkness, social media might go down, the National Guard is going to come in, and the military will be used to arrest these people," she added. "That is what I believe is happening right now."
In a thread about this on the Voat QAnon board, they are very, very excited for these mass arrests, the public hangings they hope will go along with them, and the idea of getting to have "side bets on how long the eyes and mouth move after decapitation." They are all very normal US citizens!

But it's not all internet randos! Sean Hannity, this week, cited an "MIT guy" who said that the whole coronavirus thing is just a big fraud meant to "manipulate economies, suppress dissent, and push mandated medicines."

Hannity, via Media Matters:

Gateway Pundit points out that as of yesterday that the President's approval rating is fine and he's getting pretty good grades on everything else. There's an MIT guy I noticed on Twitter, and you know he's saying pretty much the same thing he does research nearly every single day on immune systems he said quote "coronavirus fear-mongering by the Deep State will go down in history as one of the biggest frauds to manipulate economies, suppress dissent, and push mandated medicines." May be true.
Except probably not!

It should not surprise you at all to know that the "MIT guy" Hannity noticed on Twitter is in fact Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, a QAnon weirdo who thinks he invented email and is currently running for Elizabeth Warren's Senate seat.

Like the coronavirus, it is likely that these conspiracy theories are likely to get worse before they get better — but hopefully they remain quarantined in the stupider parts of the internet."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 01:59:11 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 14, 2020, 01:55:24 PM
old people dying in hospitals

Unheard of!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:02:40 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 01:59:11 PM
Unheard of!  ;D

Yeah, "fuck the doomed", as Ayn Rand might say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:04:15 PM
Quote from: André on March 14, 2020, 12:50:14 PM
« Bergamo newspaper obituary from February 9: 1 page
Same newspaper's obituary from March 13: 10 pages.
A simple flu. Thanks. »

10 pages, really? Please give the source.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 14, 2020, 02:05:05 PM
You got it but didn't care to read.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:06:15 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 14, 2020, 08:32:05 AM
Virus can remain viable "in aerosols up to 3 hours, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel" a Princeton study awaiting peer review has found https://t.co/8AEaFd230k
A couple of days ago, I watched one t.v. show (interviewing a doctor by another doctor--a heart surgeon) who said if I'm recalling correctly, that the virus could last up to 9 days (which was explained as being much longer than other viruses) then I heard a program on NPR which said it was a much shorter time (a couple of days I believe?)....urgh!   ::)

Am planning on hitting a couple of supermarkets early tomorrow with a friend...hoping that they'll been able to restock overnight.  This is cuckoo!

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 02:07:32 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 01:59:11 PM
Unheard of!  ;D

I didn't want to take the bet, but, come to think of it, I do want to make that deal you offered earlier this week: let's stop reacting to each other's posts, unless it's about music.

I.c. the 'diner': I wish you a happy mocking continuation about other people's worries. Bon appétit and have a healthy digestion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:09:04 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:02:40 PM
Yeah, "fuck the doomed", as Ayn Rand might say.

Well, yes of course. If you had cancer, or pneumonia, or diabetes or any other life-threatening condition, the probability that you'll die from seasonal flue is not much less than that of dying from Covid-19. Nothing to do with Ayn Rand, everything to do with biology.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:10:35 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:04:15 PM
10 pages, really? Please give the source.

https://nypost.com/2020/03/14/heartbreaking-video-shows-coronavirus-devastating-toll-on-italy/

But its just the flu. Once again you're an apologist for a Trump narrative (though strictly speaking his is "its nothing to worry about, but I saved you all from it")
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:12:21 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 14, 2020, 02:07:32 PM
let's stop reacting to each other's posts, unless it's about music.

Had I realized at first sight it was you whom I was reolying to, I'd have refrained from posting alright.

Otherwise, agreed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:14:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:10:35 PM
you're an apologist for a Trump narrative

Your fixation on Trump is worisome (pun).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 14, 2020, 02:20:02 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:09:04 PM. If you had cancer, or pneumonia, or diabetes or any other life-threatening condition, the probability that you'll die from seasonal flue is not much less than that of dying from Covid-19.

This is an unsubstantiated claim on you part.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:31:58 PM
...and no reason to casually dismiss their potential deaths when with the right reaction and attitudes to guarding against the virus they could live a further x years or decades to do who knows what.

But, meh, they're just the old and sick, so fuck 'em.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:36:58 PM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 14, 2020, 11:41:43 AM
I'm beginning to see little signs of civilizational slippage, i.e. things that indicate people are dealing with an unprecedented crisis. My local library just closed for the duration, and today they sent me an overdue notice, indicating that the items I checked out are overdue. The due date is listed as 1962. This has never happened to me before.

I wondered how large a fine I would have to pay, but their website contained this notice:

"You may have received a message saying that your items are overdue...by about 58 years. Obviously, this is not correct (unless you have invented time travel, in which case: we have some questions). We think that the issue occurred when we were resetting due dates. We've put in a ticket with our tech company."
Thank you so much for making me laugh!  I really needed that.   :)  My local library is closed for a while...who knows for exactly how long....lots of other public places including schools closed too.  I suspect that there will be a lot of "play it by ear" as far as the authorities goes.  I wish that we had a national policy to direct things.  Rather than a town-by-town or (better) emanating from the state level.  I'm, I think, lucky in that it seems that our town is being more on the proactive side.  It's still hard though as decisions are being made at different levels depending upon who has the authority to make them.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:46:42 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 14, 2020, 02:20:02 PM
This is an unsubstantiated claim on you part.

Is it really? Are you really going to tell me that the seasonal flue kills people who have no pre-existing, life-threatening condition?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:48:31 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 14, 2020, 11:47:18 AM
Governments across the world are advised by experts and are taking drastic measures, so yes I am taking this very seriously indeed. It is predicted that in the UK 80% of the population will be infected, the symptoms for some will be so mild that they will not even realise they have it, however, 1% are predicted to die, and of course for those aged over 65 the % of deaths shoots up. The affect on stock markets and businesses, large and small, worldwide is catastrophic.
I've been stunned by what I've seen happen to the markets; I don't know in detail what happened elsewhere, but when Pres. Trump was talking on Friday about the new measures to be taken, it was heartening to see the market react positively (up around 700 points).  Anyone who is either close to or is retired's blood pressure surely went up!

And yes, it's scary to see/hear about the risks to people who are middle age and older.  How do you protect everyone?  Also, how do you protect health care workers....people who are healthy are buying up the needed masks.  I spoke recently to one construction worker who was doing some demolition work inside a house and he told me of the problems trying to get masks to protect him from the dust/debris.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 14, 2020, 11:52:27 AM
Hah! Book to the Future!
Very clever Karl!! ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 02:50:58 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:36:58 PM
Thank you so much for making me laugh!  I really needed that.   :)  My local library is closed for a while...who knows for exactly how long....lots of other public places including schools closed too.  I suspect that there will be a lot of "play it by ear" as far as the authorities goes.  I wish that we had a national policy to direct things.  Rather than a town-by-town or (better) emanating from the state level.  I'm, I think, lucky in that it seems that our town is being more on the proactive side.  It's still hard though as decisions are being made at different levels depending upon who has the authority to make them.

PD

Proactivity, yeah. Saw a lovely short vid on the telly this evening, about volunteers who called the (known) elderly and the weaker people of their area on a daily basis, to ask if they wanted to have a little chat and/or if they could get them some groceries or medicin. Normally they were visited by acquaintances or by family, but since the higher risk that's not possible anymore, so they came up with this solution. One old man wanted to thank a volunteer who delivered some stuff (he wasn't allowed to bring it inside though) by shaking his hand. "No no, we can't do that!" the guy said.

(I did not see a volunteering librarian ringing up elderly people to say that they should return their 1726 copy of Gulliver's Travels though.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:56:53 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:31:58 PM
.they're just the old and sick

I'm sorry to state it but the old and sick are going to die much earlier than the young and healthy --- and I'm greatly puzzled that anyone can be morally opposed to a mere biological fact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 03:01:24 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:56:53 PM
I'm sorry to state it but the old and sick are going to die much earlier than the young and healthy --- and I'm greatly puzzled that anyone can be morally opposed to a mere biological fact.

And I'm saying that more will die than need to with an "its just the flu" reaction. Which you seem unconcerned about. That doesn't mean anyone needs to freak out or panic, but they should be trusting the advice of medical experts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 03:14:41 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 02:31:58 PM
[...]
But, meh, they're just the old and sick, so fuck 'em.

Doctors have been dying too, btw. But hey, they could have known that it can be a dangerous job sometimes.
And they drink and smoketoomuch anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQODVsl5pFY

https://www.youtube.com/v/vQODVsl5pFY
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 14, 2020, 03:21:53 PM
Coronavirus: Ten reasons why you ought not to panic (https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-ten-reasons-why-you-ought-not-to-panic-132941)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 14, 2020, 03:27:38 PM
In another episode from "Dumb and Dumber" I see that the NZ Prime Minister has effectively closed the country's borders to everyone except Pacific Islanders.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120279430/coronavirus-prime-minister-updates-nz-on-covid19-outbreak

Sounds good, but it's not. For a start, the horse has already bolted so what's the point of closing the stable door? While NZ has recorded six confirmed cases of the virus you can safely assume that there are many more. This is 'knee jerk' of the highest order.

Also, why are Pasifika exempt? Are the immune to the disease? It's the only reason I can think of. The fact is that Fiji, Samoa, Rarotonga, etc, have all had many international visitors over the last couple of months leaving the strong possibility that some of their citizens are infected as well.

As I said in a previous post, at least our government here in OZ is encouraging us to carry on as normally as possible but the whole affair reminds me of "Chicken Licken"

So what can we do other than stockpile goods we will probably take years to consume? How about looking after those who are most likely to be affected by this - our senior citizens. Put a plan into place to minimise the risk for them. Put a plan in place to make sure that they get the best possible protection. This alone should help reduce eventual fatalities.

As an aside, I was in Aldi yesterday and noticed that frozen foods are the next thing that people are stockpiling. Now a freezer can only hold so much and I wonder if Harvey Norman's are witnessing panic buying in their white goods section. :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 03:34:20 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 14, 2020, 03:27:38 PM
[...]
So what can we do other than stockpile goods we will probably take years to consume? How about looking after those who are most likely to be affected by this - our senior citizens. Put a plan into place to minimise the risk for them. Put a plan in place to make sure that they get the best possible protection. This alone should help reduce eventual fatalities.

That's what's been happening in most countries, I think/hope.

Quote
As an aside, I was in Aldi yesterday and noticed that frozen foods are the next thing that people are stockpiling. Now a freezer can only hold so much and I wonder if Harvey Norman's are witnessing panic buying in their white goods section. :D

Yeah, when their freezers are stuffed with food they might slow down, the selfish bastards. And then indeed they will be stockpiling freezers without a doubt. Stockpiling can be addictive. Well, at least some parts of the economy are making money.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 03:44:17 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 14, 2020, 03:27:38 PM
In another episode from "Dumb and Dumber" I see that the NZ Prime Minister has effectively closed the country's borders to everyone except Pacific Islanders.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120279430/coronavirus-prime-minister-updates-nz-on-covid19-outbreak

Sounds good, but it's not. For a start, the horse has already bolted so what's the point of closing the stable door? While NZ has recorded six confirmed cases of the virus you can safely assume that there are many more. This is 'knee jerk' of the highest order.

Also, why are Pasifika exempt? Are the immune to the disease? It's the only reason I can think of. The fact is that Fiji, Samoa, Rarotonga, etc, have all had many international visitors over the last couple of months leaving the strong possibility that some of their citizens are infected as well.

As I said in a previous post, at least our government here in OZ is encouraging us to carry on as normally as possible but the whole affair reminds me of "Chicken Licken"

So what can we do other than stockpile goods we will probably take years to consume? How about looking after those who are most likely to be affected by this - our senior citizens. Put a plan into place to minimise the risk for them. Put a plan in place to make sure that they get the best possible protection. This alone should help reduce eventual fatalities.

As an aside, I was in Aldi yesterday and noticed that frozen foods are the next thing that people are stockpiling. Now a freezer can only hold so much and I wonder if Harvey Norman's are witnessing panic buying in their white goods section. :D

Did you even read the text of the article you linked to?

Because it answers all of the questions you just asked and contradicts your conclusions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 04:04:49 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 03:44:17 PM
Did you even read the text of the article you linked to?

Because it answers all of the questions you just asked and contradicts your conclusions.

I tried to open the link and read the article, but my virus software closed it after 10 seconds and said that a virus attack was blocked. :laugh:

(No kidding though. Tried it 3 times.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 14, 2020, 04:22:26 PM

     I would not assume that the new virus will only kill people who would die otherwise from seasonal flu. I used to get bad cases of the flu and since I started getting yearly flu shots, which now means the extra strong version for older people, I don't get flu serious enough to develop into bronchitis.

     We're dealing with excess deaths. People protected by flu shots will die.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 04:24:38 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 14, 2020, 04:04:49 PM
I tried to open the link and read the article, but my virus software closed it after 10 seconds and said that a virus attack was blocked. :laugh:

(No kidding though. Tried it 3 times.)

There's probably better and more info elsewhere, but here's what that one says:

Coronavirus: Everyone coming to New Zealand must isolate for 14 days, Prime Minister Ardern says

"From midnight Sunday, everyone arriving in New Zealand will have to isolate themselves for 14 days, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced.

The tighter border controls were announced during an update by the prime minister on New Zealand's response to the Covid-19 outbreak on Saturday afternoon. She said while it is not realistic for New Zealand to only have a handful of coronavirus cases, the changes would slow the spread of infection.

"New Zealand has today, relative to other countries, a small number of cases," Ardern said.

"We must plan and prepare for more cases. We must go hard and we must go early. We must do everything we can to protect the health of New Zealanders."

The restrictions apply to New Zealand citizens and residents as well as international visitors.

People travelling from the Pacific Islands to New Zealand will be exempt, unless they show symptoms of coronavirus.

The new measures mean New Zealand will have the strongest border restrictions in the world, apart from Israel and some Pacific Islands, which have effectively closed their borders.

As of midnight Saturday, no cruise ships will be able to dock in New Zealand until June 30.

Strict new border exit rules to the Pacific Islands will also be put in place.

Anyone with coronavirus symptoms will not be allowed to travel there and those who have been to other overseas countries will have to wait 14 days before going to the Pacific Islands.

Close or casual contacts of confirmed cases of Covid-19 will also be barred from travelling to the Pacific Islands. All travellers' temperatures will be taken before they leave for the Pacific Islands.

Travel restrictions would be reviewed in 16 days, the prime minister said.

Ardern urged New Zealanders not to travel overseas unless it was absolutely necessary.

We have significant capacity for testing, Ardern said. "It is there and available." There are enough resources for 550 people to be tested per day.

Medical practitioners would use their clinical judgement when deciding who needed to be tested, the prime minister said.

Ardern reiterated public health messages to prevent the spread of infection. "Wash your hands," she repeated three times.

People should also stay home and avoid contact with older people if they're sick and stop greeting each other with a handshake or hongi.

Finance minister Grant Robertson will announce an economic response on Tuesday.

The Government will announce guidelines on large mass events next week too.

In the meantime, people planning on hosting such gatherings should contact their local public health authority, Ardern said.

Soon after the press conference Air New Zealand said it was reviewing the impact of the "new measures announced this afternoon on its operations and will adjust its capacity accordingly. We expect to provide an update on network changes over the next few days".

It comes after a sixth case of the novel coronavirus was confirmed in Auckland.

A man in his 60s who had recently returned from the United States tested positive for the illness on Friday night.

SO WHAT ARE THE NEW RULES FOR NZ?

* Every person entering New Zealand from anywhere in the world will be required to self-isolate for 14 days, excluding the Pacific. These restrictions will all be reviewed in 16 days' time.

* The existing travel ban for China and Iran will continue

* Cruise ships banned from coming to New Zealand, until at least June 30, 2020

* Strict new health measures at the border for people departing to the Pacific

* Measures to help those in self-isolation to be announced next week

* Government will work closely with the aviation sector to encourage airlines to remain active in New Zealand, limiting the impacts on the tourism sector and exporters

* There will be a directive on mass gatherings announced early next week

The prime minister's announcement followed a Cabinet meeting in Auckland on Saturday."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 14, 2020, 04:26:09 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 14, 2020, 03:34:20 PM
That's what's been happening in most countries, I think/hope.

Yeah, when their freezers are stuffed with food they might slow down, the selfish bastards. And then indeed they will be stockpiling freezers without a doubt. Stockpiling can be addictive. Well, at least some parts of the economy are making money.

At the height of the epidemic electricity maintenance crews will be affected, too (why shouldn't they?). So next time there's a power outing they won't be able to repair it. All those frozen goods will go to waste...

Consequences (real, imagined and just wacky) are endless...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 14, 2020, 04:33:45 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 14, 2020, 03:21:53 PM
Coronavirus: Ten reasons why you ought not to panic (https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-ten-reasons-why-you-ought-not-to-panic-132941)
Thanks for posting this reassuring article Karl.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 14, 2020, 04:35:08 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 14, 2020, 02:48:31 PM
I've been stunned by what I've seen happen to the markets; I don't know in detail what happened elsewhere, but when Pres. Trump was talking on Friday about the new measures to be taken, it was heartening to see the market react positively (up around 700 points).  Anyone who is either close to or is retired's blood pressure surely went up!



     I've been retired for just over 5 years, and my reaction is that the market drop is not the big deal, it's the recession that's developing that has me a little concerned. I'm looking at 2 years to get back to the 2020 high, give or take. If it was a typical markety bad news panic it would right itself in weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 04:47:05 PM
Quote from: André on March 14, 2020, 04:26:09 PM
At the height of the epidemic electricity maintenance crews will be affected, too (why shouldn't they?). So next time there's a power outing they won't be able to repair it. All those frozen goods will go to waste...

Consequences (real, imagined and just wacky) are endless...

:laugh:

That will teach them!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 14, 2020, 04:50:23 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 14, 2020, 04:24:38 PM
There's probably better and more info elsewhere, but here's what that one says:

Coronavirus: Everyone coming to New Zealand must isolate for 14 days, Prime Minister Ardern says

"From midnight Sunday, everyone arriving in New Zealand will have to isolate themselves for 14 days, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced.

The tighter border controls were announced during an update by the prime minister on New Zealand's response to the Covid-19 outbreak on Saturday afternoon. She said while it is not realistic for New Zealand to only have a handful of coronavirus cases, the changes would slow the spread of infection.

"New Zealand has today, relative to other countries, a small number of cases," Ardern said.

"We must plan and prepare for more cases. We must go hard and we must go early. We must do everything we can to protect the health of New Zealanders."

The restrictions apply to New Zealand citizens and residents as well as international visitors.

People travelling from the Pacific Islands to New Zealand will be exempt, unless they show symptoms of coronavirus.

The new measures mean New Zealand will have the strongest border restrictions in the world, apart from Israel and some Pacific Islands, which have effectively closed their borders.

As of midnight Saturday, no cruise ships will be able to dock in New Zealand until June 30.

Strict new border exit rules to the Pacific Islands will also be put in place.

Anyone with coronavirus symptoms will not be allowed to travel there and those who have been to other overseas countries will have to wait 14 days before going to the Pacific Islands.

Close or casual contacts of confirmed cases of Covid-19 will also be barred from travelling to the Pacific Islands. All travellers' temperatures will be taken before they leave for the Pacific Islands.

Travel restrictions would be reviewed in 16 days, the prime minister said.

Ardern urged New Zealanders not to travel overseas unless it was absolutely necessary.

We have significant capacity for testing, Ardern said. "It is there and available." There are enough resources for 550 people to be tested per day.

Medical practitioners would use their clinical judgement when deciding who needed to be tested, the prime minister said.

Ardern reiterated public health messages to prevent the spread of infection. "Wash your hands," she repeated three times.

People should also stay home and avoid contact with older people if they're sick and stop greeting each other with a handshake or hongi.

Finance minister Grant Robertson will announce an economic response on Tuesday.

The Government will announce guidelines on large mass events next week too.

In the meantime, people planning on hosting such gatherings should contact their local public health authority, Ardern said.

Soon after the press conference Air New Zealand said it was reviewing the impact of the "new measures announced this afternoon on its operations and will adjust its capacity accordingly. We expect to provide an update on network changes over the next few days".

It comes after a sixth case of the novel coronavirus was confirmed in Auckland.

A man in his 60s who had recently returned from the United States tested positive for the illness on Friday night.

SO WHAT ARE THE NEW RULES FOR NZ?

* Every person entering New Zealand from anywhere in the world will be required to self-isolate for 14 days, excluding the Pacific. These restrictions will all be reviewed in 16 days' time.

* The existing travel ban for China and Iran will continue

* Cruise ships banned from coming to New Zealand, until at least June 30, 2020

* Strict new health measures at the border for people departing to the Pacific

* Measures to help those in self-isolation to be announced next week

* Government will work closely with the aviation sector to encourage airlines to remain active in New Zealand, limiting the impacts on the tourism sector and exporters

* There will be a directive on mass gatherings announced early next week

The prime minister's announcement followed a Cabinet meeting in Auckland on Saturday."

Thanks.
I just read the Dutch (more or less) equivalent message of the news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 14, 2020, 07:05:00 PM
I think people need to just stop panicking. One thing is for certain about this coronavirus scare --- there are many people (and companies) profiting off this pandemic and it certainly isn't us. I saw a large bottle of Purell hand sanitizer go for $200 on eBay. Absolute vultures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 14, 2020, 08:25:03 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 14, 2020, 07:05:00 PM
I think people need to just stop panicking. One thing is for certain about this coronavirus scare --- there are many people (and companies) profiting off this pandemic and it certainly isn't us. I saw a large bottle of Purell hand sanitizer go for $200 on eBay. Absolute vultures.
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on March 14, 2020, 11:05:11 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 12:00:46 PM
Many happy returns! What wine will you have?

Thank you! We had a Franciacorta (Bellavista) for the initial toast, and a Vermentino di Gallura (Canayli) for the rest of the dinner. Just perfect for the sea bream.

Good luck and best wishes to you all in Romania. I see you have about one hundred cases and no deaths. I do really hope it remains the same, but in case you will change your mind. Trust me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 15, 2020, 01:06:46 AM
One of my daughter's flat mates works as a waitress in a restaurant in London. The clientele is mainly elderly. She said that they'd never sold so much alcohol before and that the atmosphere there reminded her of the first class lounge of the Titanic as it was going down!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 15, 2020, 02:26:53 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 02:46:42 PM
Is it really? Are you really going to tell me that the seasonal flue kills people who have no pre-existing, life-threatening condition?

You can read a bit about Primary Influenza Pneumonia here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811908/

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 02:59:40 AM
Quote from: GioCar on March 14, 2020, 11:05:11 PM
Thank you! We had a Franciacorta (Bellavista) for the initial toast, and a Vermentino di Gallura (Canayli) for the rest of the dinner. Just perfect for the sea bream.

Great!

QuoteGood luck and best wishes to you all in Romania. I see you have about one hundred cases and no deaths. I do really hope it remains the same, but in case you will change your mind. Trust me.

Thanks, the same to all of you in Italy. 123 as I'm typing.

I repeat: the situation should be taken seriously and all regulations and restrictions must be obeyed unconditionally. What I'm opposed to is mass panic and hysteria.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 15, 2020, 04:46:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 14, 2020, 11:58:39 AM
I think the figure is greatly exaggerated.

That's valid for every seasonal flu in every country in every hemisphere.

Oh, the horror, the horror!

That is certainly true --- because, and only because, they're most likely to have pre-existing life-threatening conditions.

It could most certainly be catastrophic if mass media and governments alike will keep spreading and inducing mass panic and hysteria.

As long as you are not one among them.Then why give a toss. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 04:52:47 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 15, 2020, 04:46:57 AM
As long as you are not one among them.Then why give a toss. ;D

My point is that a 1% mortality rate is no reason for panic.

In Romania there are 131 confirmed cases and no deaths until now. In the context this is good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 15, 2020, 05:06:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 04:52:47 AM
My point is that a 1% mortality rate is no reason for panic.


That would depend on the infection rate, surely.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 15, 2020, 05:15:20 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 02:59:40 AMI repeat: the situation should be taken seriously and all regulations and restrictions must be obeyed unconditionally. What I'm opposed to is mass panic and hysteria.

You'd be hard-pressed to find someone who's pro-mass panic and hysteria. As you said, it's all about taking the situation seriously and thankfully, that's what I'm seeing all around my country and most of Europe. The UK and the States, on the other hand..

As for Czech Republic, people are stockpiling on food as we're heading for a nationwide quarantine right now – it's all about not overwhelming the medical system when the serious cases start appearing.

COVID-19, the illness caused by coronavirus, proves deadly in around 3.5 percent of confirmed cases.

While this is not the same as its mortality rate, given many people may be infected but not realise it, it is significantly higher than seasonal flu, which typically kills 0.1 percent of patients.

"There is still considerable uncertainty around the fatality rates of COVID-19 and it likely varies depending on the quality of local healthcare," said Francois Balloux, Professor of Computational Systems Biology at University College London.

"That said, it is around two percent on average, which is about 20 times higher than for the seasonal flu lineages currently in circulation."

(...)

Disease experts estimate that each COVID-19 sufferer infects between two to 3 others.

That's a reproduction rate up to twice as high as seasonal flu, which typically infects 1.3 new people for each patient.


Source: https://www.sciencealert.com/the-new-coronavirus-isn-t-like-the-flu-but-they-have-one-big-thing-in-common (https://www.sciencealert.com/the-new-coronavirus-isn-t-like-the-flu-but-they-have-one-big-thing-in-common)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 15, 2020, 05:21:35 AM
Gotta say: watching the news from around the world I'm not seeing much of what I'd call panic. People have been encouragingly civilised. I was about to add "long may it last" nut that wouldnt be quite the right way of expressing the sentiment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 15, 2020, 05:24:02 AM
Why outbreaks like coronavirus spread exponentially, and how to "flatten the curve" (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 15, 2020, 05:54:20 AM
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-italy-update-young-people-hospital-luca-lorini-bergamo-a9402531.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 15, 2020, 06:30:12 AM
Talk about gallows humor..

(https://i.imgur.com/EpePRsq.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 15, 2020, 06:46:36 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 04:52:47 AM
My point is that a 1% mortality rate is no reason for panic.

What if the mortality rate in your age group is 4% or 8% or more. Well, would you still say: No reason for panic, we are all going to die eventually?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 14, 2020, 04:33:45 PM
Thanks for posting this reassuring article Karl.
:)

De nada, amigo!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 07:40:52 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 15, 2020, 04:52:47 AM
My point is that a 1% mortality rate is no reason for panic.

In Romania there are 131 confirmed cases and no deaths until now. In the context this is good news.

     Panic, at least the way the word is commonly used, is defined by no reason for it, though that might be misleading in the case of an H-bomb exploding just above you.

     The good news about Romania is that the later the pandemic develops, the more time there is to impose limits on the exponential rise in the number of cases. Here in Massachusetts we have about 138 recorded cases at last count by the failing Boston Globe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 07:54:04 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 07:40:52 AM
     Panic, at least the way the word is commonly used, is defined by no reason for it, though that might be misleading in the case of an H-bomb exploding just above you.

     The good news about Romania is that the later the pandemic develops, the more time there is to impose limits on the exponential rise in the number of cases. Here in Massachusetts we have about 138 recorded cases at last count by the failing Boston Globe.

Dang "corporate media"!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 15, 2020, 08:25:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 15, 2020, 07:54:04 AM
Dang "corporate media"!

Is Die Welt am Sonntag also dang corporate media?
They've just released an article in which is told that Trump is trying hard to buy a German bio-medical company (CureVac) that's been trying to develop a vaccin against the latest Corona virus. This company is a private company, but it works together with German government-related institutions. According to Die Welt, Trump wants those researches, findings and medicins exclusively for the USA. The German government wants to block the possible sale, but still, CureVac is a private company, which means that, in special occasions, they are allowed to decide on their own. Words in Berlin go that Trump is offering a billion.

For those who understand German:

https://amp.welt.de/wirtschaft/article206555143/Corona-USA-will-Zugriff-auf-deutsche-Impfstoff-Firma.html?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 08:31:46 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 15, 2020, 08:25:32 AM
Is Die Welt am Sonntag also dang corporate media?

How can we know, if Kyle does not pronounce unto us'ns?!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 15, 2020, 08:40:25 AM
Perhaps we could keep Kyle out of this thread? He's present enough elsewhere on GMG.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 15, 2020, 08:42:47 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 15, 2020, 08:25:32 AM
Is Die Welt am Sonntag also dang corporate media?
They've just released an article in which is told that Trump is trying hard to buy a German bio-medical company (CureVac) that's been trying to develop a vaccin against the latest Corona virus. This company is a private company, but it works together with German government-related institutions. According to Die Welt, Trump wants those researches, findings and medicins exclusively for the USA. The German government wants to block the possible sale, but still, CureVac is a private company, which means that, in special occasions, they are allowed to decide on their own. Words in Berlin go that Trump is offering a billion.

For those who understand German:

https://amp.welt.de/wirtschaft/article206555143/Corona-USA-will-Zugriff-auf-deutsche-Impfstoff-Firma.html?

I read that yesterday (Washington Post?). I'm not surprised.

The situation is tense in US airports. 6 hours to get your luggage, 2 hours standing shoulder to shoulder in the Customs file. People complain that airports are being transformed in virus incubators.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 09:00:00 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 15, 2020, 08:25:32 AM
Is Die Welt am Sonntag also dang corporate media?


     I think the point is that "corporate" is not the right framing for every kind of news. There is no distinctly corporate meaning to "138 cases in Massachusetts".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 09:00:36 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 15, 2020, 08:40:25 AM
Perhaps we could keep Kyle out of this thread? He's present enough elsewhere on GMG.

Fair enow!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 09:01:08 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 09:00:00 AM
     I think the point is that "corporate" is not the right framing for every kind of news. There is no distinctly corporate meaning to "138 cases in Massachusetts".

Precisamente!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 15, 2020, 09:01:40 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 09:00:00 AM
     I think the point is that "corporate" is not the right framing for every kind of news. There is no distinctly corporate meaning to "138 cases in Massachusetts".

I was being ironic a bit, because of the 'mayhem' about the 'lying corporate media' in other Diner threads...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 09:04:14 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 15, 2020, 09:01:40 AM
I was being ironic a bit, because of the 'mayhem' about the 'lying corporate media' in other Diner threads...

ed anche naturalmente!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 15, 2020, 09:08:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 15, 2020, 09:01:08 AM
Precisamente!

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 15, 2020, 09:04:14 AM
ed anche naturalmente!

You're working on an Italian opera, Karl? ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on March 15, 2020, 01:17:58 PM
Could one of you heroes send me a few rolls of toilet paper??  ???   :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 15, 2020, 01:53:02 PM
Current total of worldwide confirmed cases, per Johns Hopkins University: 162,687

Current number of worldwide deaths, per Johns Hopkins University: 6,065

Total countries affected thus far: 127

Massachusetts total cases: 45 confirmed, 119 presumptive
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 02:27:37 PM
     Mortality rate by age, based on an analysis from Hubei province figures:

Age Group — Mortality Rate

0-9 — <.01 percent
10-19 — .02 percent
20-29 — .09 percent
30-39 — .18 percent
40-49 — .40 percent
50-59 — 1.3 percent
60-69 — 4.6 percent
70-79 — 9.8 percent
80 & up — 18 percent
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 15, 2020, 03:16:34 PM
Journalists from the french daily Libération are calling on authories to up their response to the pandemic. In this article they say that the elderly are 'sacrificed' due to the lack of respirators. This can be correlated to the recent spike in deaths in Italy (368 yesterday only) and the Eco di Bergamo's obituary pages that leapt from 1 and 1/2  page on February 9 to 10 pages on March 13 (Bergamo is at the epicenter of the outbreak in Italy). Last week's patients are younger than at the beginning (in their forties). Doctors have to decide who will get the respirators, and some hard choices have to be made.


https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2020/03/12/journalistes-francais-en-italie-pour-que-la-france-prenne-enfin-la-mesure-du-danger_1781450 (https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2020/03/12/journalistes-francais-en-italie-pour-que-la-france-prenne-enfin-la-mesure-du-danger_1781450)

The article is in French.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 03:39:11 PM

     I read this somewhere so I'll pass it on. This is a good time to stop using cash.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 15, 2020, 04:10:24 PM
An article about some of the behavior we are seeing:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/why-people-are-panic-buying-toilet-paper/ar-BB112sCl?ocid=msedgntp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 04:31:36 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 15, 2020, 04:10:24 PM
An article about some of the behavior we are seeing:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/why-people-are-panic-buying-toilet-paper/ar-BB112sCl?ocid=msedgntp

     The question assumes something not in evidence, that panic and not an overactive precaution gland causes people to stock up. Stocking up means fewer shopping trips and fewer occasions for catching the virus. You get as much as you can in one trip and then you stay home like any rational neurotic should do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 15, 2020, 04:59:23 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 15, 2020, 08:25:32 AM
Is Die Welt am Sonntag also dang corporate media?
They've just released an article in which is told that Trump is trying hard to buy a German bio-medical company (CureVac) that's been trying to develop a vaccin against the latest Corona virus. This company is a private company, but it works together with German government-related institutions. According to Die Welt, Trump wants those researches, findings and medicins exclusively for the USA. The German government wants to block the possible sale, but still, CureVac is a private company, which means that, in special occasions, they are allowed to decide on their own. Words in Berlin go that Trump is offering a billion.

For those who understand German:

https://amp.welt.de/wirtschaft/article206555143/Corona-USA-will-Zugriff-auf-deutsche-Impfstoff-Firma.html?
NPR this afternoon reported there are 18 different companies, in the US, plus various labs, biomedical centers, etc, working in a vaccine.

The headquarters of the CDC is located on the edge of my alma mater's campus (Emory University, home of the Carter Center and only school to have the honor of having the Dalai Lama listed as a faculty member).   The university emailed an update today, to say among other things two students possibly have the virus. So it's literally down the street from the CDC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 12:00:40 AM
I went into a local supermarket yesterday which appeared to have just been visited by a plague of locusts.

More encouragingly, a neighbour came round yesterday to ask for help in setting up a local support group to try and assist anyone in the village who needs help during the crisis. Apparently everyone so far had agreed to join the group.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 16, 2020, 02:36:03 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 02:27:37 PM
     Mortality rate by age, based on an analysis from Hubei province figures:

Age Group — Mortality Rate

0-9 — <.01 percent
10-19 — .02 percent
20-29 — .09 percent
30-39 — .18 percent
40-49 — .40 percent
50-59 — 1.3 percent
60-69 — 4.6 percent
70-79 — 9.8 percent
80 & up — 18 percent

This list, which isn't corrected for other serious diseases (heart disease, chronic lung disease et.c.) and doesn't mention whether the patients have got relevant treatment or not, isn't that useful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 03:29:45 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 15, 2020, 04:31:36 PM
     The question assumes something not in evidence, that panic and not an overactive precaution gland causes people to stock up. Stocking up means fewer shopping trips and fewer occasions for catching the virus. You get as much as you can in one trip and then you stay home like any rational neurotic should do.

In other words, it's rational and acceptable, recommendable even, to fight over and stockpile toilet paper, food and beverages.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 03:45:54 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 16, 2020, 02:36:03 AM
This list, which isn't corrected for other serious diseases (heart disease, chronic lung disease et.c.) and doesn't mention whether the patients have got relevant treatment or not, isn't that useful.

We don't know whether it is corrected or not or whether the patients were treated or not because drogulus did not provide the source, but imo the figures might be quite realistic. The mortality begins to rise for the 50-59 yo group, accelerates for 60-69 and explodes for 70-79. For 80 and over it's a disaster. Nothing unexpected, it's common sense that the probablity of dying from Covid-19 is much greater for older people who, by the very fact of being old, already have "other serious diseases (heart disease, chronic lung disease et.c.)".

The real problem with this list (or any other) is that it refers to cases which have been reported and confirmed. If, as doctors say, about 80% of the people who get infected develop a form with mild symptoms, or even no symptoms at all, then probably there are many cases which have not been reported and that means that the mortality rate might be smaller in reality, though I suspect that the difference is not dramatic, at least not for the older age groups which would anyway mostly fall in the other 20% (medium or severe symptoms)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 16, 2020, 04:14:43 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 03:45:54 AM
We don't know whether it is corrected or not or whether the patients were treated or not because drogulus did not provide the source, but imo the figures might be quite realistic. The mortality begins to rise for the 50-59 yo group, accelerates for 60-69 and explodes for 70-79. For 80 and over it's a disaster. Nothing unexpected, it's common sense that the probablity of dying from Covid-19 is much greater for older people who, by the very fact of being old, already have "other serious diseases (heart disease, chronic lung disease et.c.)".

The real problem with this list (or any other) is that it refers to cases which have been reported and confirmed. If, as doctors say, about 80% of the people who get infected develop a form with mild symptoms, or even no symptoms at all, then probably there are many cases which have not been reported and that means that the mortality rate might be smaller in reality, though I suspect that the difference is not dramatic, at least not for the older age groups which would anyway mostly fall in the other 20% (medium or severe symptoms)

You may be right, but being medically educated myself I have often seen that estimates on an uncertain basis eventually proved to be incorrect. As the list stands, it is as well as certain, that it isn't corrected for anything. The problem with that kind of lists is, that I e.g. (being 70+ and not completely healthy but without complicating diseases which are relevant in this context) can't use it to see if my risk for serious disease is increased - and how much - if age is my only "disposition".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2020, 04:37:29 AM
Tennessee man who stockpiled hand sanitizer donates 17,700 bottles ahead of investigation (https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/487711-tennessee-man-who-stockpiled-hand-sanitizer-donates-17700)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 04:48:04 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 16, 2020, 04:14:43 AM
The problem with that kind of lists is, that I e.g. (being 70+ and not completely healthy but without complicating diseases which are relevant in this context) can't use it to see if my risk for serious disease is increased - and how much - if age is my only "disposition".

That's correct.

But do you really need such a list in order to assess your personal risk? If you are 70+ but wiithout complicating diseases which are relevant in this context you can assume that if --- God forbid! --- you catch the virus and you get adequate treatment you are likely to get cured without complications. A worse scenario, or even the worst, cannot of course be completely excluded, for any age group, but I think a vigilant optimism and the strict following of general hygienic rules and Covid-19-specific rules and restrictions is the best, most rational and helpful attitude. Let us all do whatever we are supposed to do and whatever we are urged to do in order not to get infected --- what else could we do, anyway?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 05:20:14 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 12:00:40 AM
I went into a local supermarket yesterday which appeared to have just been visited by a plague of locusts.

More encouragingly, a neighbour came round yesterday to ask for help in setting up a local support group to try and assist anyone in the village who needs help during the crisis. Apparently everyone so far had agreed to join the group.

Yeah!!   :)

Regarding the market shelves, I understand your feelings.  Hit a couple of stores yesterday with a friend of mine as we had gone (separately) the day before and experienced the shock of seeing many empty shelves, lots of fresh meat gone, frozen veg gone, etc.  Hadn't seen anything like that before (I'm grateful to say).  We went to a large supermarket getting there five minutes after they opened; number of cars in the lot (I suspect that isn't the normal case for an early Sunday morning).  We arrived there just in time: picked up some TP (not crazy amounts either)...the rest was gone in about 5-10 minutes.  No hand wipes to be found...did have some bleach there and fresh veggie area was good and they were busy restocking that.  Went to another market where I was able to purchase some chicken...my local co-op...well, no chicken in their cases but they did have some at the meat counter along with beef and fresh fish and lots of fresh veg.  Think that they were low-to-sold out of a number of frozen veg and frozen fruit.  Pretty crazy, but I was able to get 85-90% of what I wanted between the three stores.  Interestingly enough, a local small market still had about half of their normal amount of frozen veggies on their shelves (freezer units).

I do own a spare freezer (not huge but it does fill up surprisingly quickly!) which I purchased about a year ago as I do like to make things like chicken stock, soup, purchase some things when they are on sale, pick and freeze local produce, etc.

The irony:  we're supposed to social-distance as much as possible; so, how do you do this when the markets are packed?!   :( ???  I'm just trying to go less often at my end....and make sure that I'm organized before I get there (which I try to do anyways).

How are others coping here?  Are you 1) eating out less (if you did eat out often to begin with); 2) shopping less often?; 3) ordering, if possible, to have groceries and/or meals delivered?; 4) stocking up on anything in particular?; 5) cooking more of your meals from scratch?; 6) changing the time of day or days that you do shop?;  7) ordering more online?;   8 helping to shop for neighbors?  Just curious....stay safe everyone!

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 16, 2020, 05:29:31 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 16, 2020, 02:36:03 AM
This list, which isn't corrected for other serious diseases (heart disease, chronic lung disease et.c.) and doesn't mention whether the patients have got relevant treatment or not, isn't that useful.

     It's useful to me, because it fills a gap in knowledge. I know about the reasons why age matter for this disease, at least those that have been identified. I wanted to see the numbers, though.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 16, 2020, 05:35:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 03:29:45 AM
In other words, it's rational and acceptable, recommendable even, to fight over and stockpile toilet paper, food and beverages.

     When I was in line at the store people were joking about it. I didn't see any fighting. If I did see signs of, how you say, panic, I would do my best to not accept it.

     Things should settle down as the stores continue to restock shelves and people run out of room for Campbell's cream of something soup and pop tarts.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 16, 2020, 05:42:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 04:48:04 AM
...you can assume that if --- God forbid! --- you catch the virus and you get adequate treatment you are likely to get cured without complications....
The main problem appears to be that even the most advanced medical systems in the world (and, fortunately, Spain is generally considered to be among them) cannot cope with the surge of serious cases. Available space in IC units is running out, and previously unthinkable measures (such as medicalisation of some hotels) are being taken.

That's why these drastic measures to contain the pandemic (or rather, delay its spread) are being taken,  so that adequate treatment is available when it's really needed.

Madrid is now a ghost town, but there's no shortage of foodstuffs in the markets and supermarkets in my neighbourhood (which is right in the middle of the old historic centre). There's no such thing as "eating out" anymore (and surely Spaniards are a people that eat out all the time).

Regards to all,

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2020, 05:52:02 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 16, 2020, 05:42:44 AM
The main problem appears to be that even the most advanced medical systems in the world (and, fortunately, Spain is generally considered to be among them) can cope with the surge of serious cases. Available space in IC units is running out, and previously unthinkable measures (such as medicalisation of some hotels) are being taken.

That's why these drastic measures to contain the pandemic (or rather, delay its spread) are bring taken,  so that adequate treatment is available when it's really needed.

Madrid is now a ghost town, but there's no shortage of foodstuffs in the markets and supermarkets in my neighbourhood (which is right in the middle of the old historic centre). There's no such thing as "eating out" anymore (and surely Spaniards are a people that eats out all the time).

Regards to all,



Exactly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 16, 2020, 06:08:08 AM
We're not taking the 91 year old father in law to cafes now, just going for a walk and getting take away food to eat outside away from crowded areas. We now stop at a small supermarket on the way to taking the dogs for a walk rather than after, so we avoid the time when it's packed with school kids buying their sweets, chocolate, cake, biscuits and fizzy drink.

What's the state of health of the elderly Italian population nowadays? I haven't been there for about 25 years and in Britain there is now much more obesity, diabetes and medication. My image of healthy people enjoying the Mediterranean diet and sunlight may thus no longer be correct.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 16, 2020, 06:27:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 05:20:14 AM

How are others coping here?  Are you 1) eating out less (if you did eat out often to begin with); 2) shopping less often?; 3) ordering, if possible, to have groceries and/or meals delivered?; 4) stocking up on anything in particular?; 5) cooking more of your meals from scratch?; 6) changing the time of day or days that you do shop?;  7) ordering more online?;   8 helping to shop for neighbors?  Just curious....stay safe everyone!

Not that much has changed. We like to cook at home and rarely go to restaurants nowadays, and we already had a load of toilet paper, canned goods etc. at home. I did go out shopping for some specific things yesterday. Stores are imposing a limit of 2 per customer on certain key items.

The main negative difference for me personally is that work is drying up. If business trips aren't being made, then deals aren't being done, then work is not being generated for me. I'm trying to make the most of the free time, which isn't hard because I can come up with lots of things to do.

The most depressing thing is that our local brewpub closed. I suppose it was inevitable, but we normally go there 2/3 times a week, often with dog. So I'm gonna miss that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 16, 2020, 07:28:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 04:48:04 AM

But do you really need such a list in order to assess your personal risk? If you are 70+ but wiithout complicating diseases which are relevant in this context you can assume that if --- God forbid! --- you catch the virus and you get adequate treatment you are likely to get cured without complications. A worse scenario, or even the worst, cannot of course be completely excluded, for any age group, but I think a vigilant optimism and the strict following of general hygienic rules and Covid-19-specific rules and restrictions is the best, most rational and helpful attitude. Let us all do whatever we are supposed to do and whatever we are urged to do in order not to get infected --- what else could we do, anyway?

Of course, I take my precautions, just as all other sensible people do. But it would be nice to see a statistic that showed my risk not being much higher than the average risk of all ages, instead of this which shows that people in my age group have got a relatively high risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 08:39:40 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 16, 2020, 06:08:08 AM
We're not taking the 91 year old father in law to cafes now, just going for a walk and getting take away food to eat outside away from crowded areas. We now stop at a small supermarket on the way to taking the dogs for a walk rather than after, so we avoid the time when it's packed with school kids buying their sweets, chocolate, cake, biscuits and fizzy drink.

What's the state of health of the elderly Italian population nowadays? I haven't been there for about 25 years and in Britain there is now much more obesity, diabetes and medication. My image of healthy people enjoying the Mediterranean diet and sunlight may thus no longer be correct.
Sorry to hear that...particularly regarding your father-in-law.  How are his spirits holding up?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 08:44:33 AM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 16, 2020, 06:27:30 AM
Not that much has changed. We like to cook at home and rarely go to restaurants nowadays, and we already had a load of toilet paper, canned goods etc. at home. I did go out shopping for some specific things yesterday. Stores are imposing a limit of 2 per customer on certain key items.

The main negative difference for me personally is that work is drying up. If business trips aren't being made, then deals aren't being done, then work is not being generated for me. I'm trying to make the most of the free time, which isn't hard because I can come up with lots of things to do.

The most depressing thing is that our local brewpub closed. I suppose it was inevitable, but we normally go there 2/3 times a week, often with dog. So I'm gonna miss that.
I'm very sorry to hear to hear about it effecting your work.  Is there a way that you could (or whomever is behind 'the deals') teleconference?  Or does one have to be physically there to demonstrate the product or design it, etc.?

And how long is the pub closed for--at the minimum?  Sounds like a nice place to go to too!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 16, 2020, 08:47:16 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 16, 2020, 07:28:58 AM
Of course, I take my precautions, just as all other sensible people do. But it would be nice to see a statistic that showed my risk not being much higher than the average risk of all ages, instead of this which shows that people in my age group have got a relatively high risk.

     That's true, but I suppose that the high risk associated with age incorporates all factors, including the likelihood that you have a standard mix of age related deficiencies in your immune system.

     I know I'm as well protected from seasonal flu as any person my age can be. That's not a strong indicator of how my immune system will function faced with a novel virus. The safe assumption is that I'm less safe than a 40 year old me would be. I also suppose that if we had a good chart for healthy people divided into the same age brackets we'd have a gentler curve.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 16, 2020, 08:54:45 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 08:39:40 AM
Sorry to hear that...particularly regarding your father-in-law.  How are his spirits holding up?

PD

I don't think he appreciates what's going on, he's pretty confused, so actually he's quite cheerful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 16, 2020, 09:43:06 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 08:44:33 AM
I'm very sorry to hear to hear about it effecting your work.  Is there a way that you could (or whomever is behind 'the deals') teleconference?  Or does one have to be physically there to demonstrate the product or design it, etc.?

And how long is the pub closed for--at the minimum?  Sounds like a nice place to go to too!

PD

I'm a translator, so I'm working with documents on my computer, and all of this depends on having a smooth flow of international business. Demand naturally fluctuates, that's the nature of this freelance job, but I have no idea how long the current slowdown will last. Teleconferencing is irrelevant to me personally.

The brewpub is planning to close this week until it becomes safe to reopen. It is a nice place, in fact they just celebrated their 10th anniversary. They've won a lot of awards over that decade.

https://www.lbbrew.com/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:12:53 AM
The schools in the UK are staying open for now. I dislike Boris Johnson but think it is the right decision. If the school, where I teach, closes I will be expected to teach my classes by 'online video lessons' from home. Sounds like a total nightmare. Apparently my students will be able to see me but I will not be able to see them. I have a vision of trying to teach them from the living room of my house with the cat standing on the laptop keyboard and staring into the screen, as he often does, and my wife shouting from the kitchen for me to come and help with the washing up. I told my daughter about this nightmare scenario and her boss said that she wants to join my 'online lesson'.  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 10:15:38 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 16, 2020, 07:28:58 AM
it would be nice to see a statistic that showed my risk not being much higher than the average risk of all ages, instead of this which shows that people in my age group have got a relatively high risk.

No doubt it will be a most reassuring thing. Well, let's wait for such statistics to be compiled and relesed, I'm sure somebody somewhere is working at it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 16, 2020, 10:20:50 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 05:20:14 AMHow are others coping here?  Are you 1) eating out less (if you did eat out often to begin with); 2) shopping less often?; 3) ordering, if possible, to have groceries and/or meals delivered?; 4) stocking up on anything in particular?; 5) cooking more of your meals from scratch?; 6) changing the time of day or days that you do shop?;  7) ordering more online?;   8 helping to shop for neighbors?  Just curious....stay safe everyone!

Restaurants are not an option anymore, so we're cooking (and having lots of fun coming up with recipes for meals we haven't had for ages). We've limited our shopping and try to plan ahead more, although we're not stocking up on anything. We've stitched together our own masks as most of the country is doing right now, including people making bunches of them for their local hospitals/retirement homes – the community really coming together is what gives me hope. I see neighbors helping each other and basically people acting in a sensible and unselfish way, now that they realized the true magnitude of this thing.

I can work my primary job from home, which makes things super easy for me, but I've got a lot of friends in the music/sound/theatre business who are suddenly without a paycheck, so we're trying to help them any way we can right now.

Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:12:53 AM
The schools in the UK are staying open for now. I dislike Boris Johnson but think it is the right decision.

I respectfully disagree. This is gambling with people's lives.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:56:01 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 16, 2020, 10:20:50 AM
Restaurants are not an option anymore, so we're cooking (and having lots of fun coming up with recipes for meals we haven't had for ages). We've limited our shopping and try to plan ahead more, although we're not stocking up on anything. We've stitched together our own masks as most of the country is doing right now, including people making bunches of them for their local hospitals/retirement homes – the community really coming together is what gives me hope. I see neighbors helping each other and basically people acting in a sensible and unselfish way, now that they realized the true magnitude of this thing.

I can work my primary job from home, which makes things super easy for me, but I've got a lot of friends in the music/sound/theatre business who are suddenly without a paycheck, so we're trying to help them any way we can right now.

I respectfully disagree. This is gambling with people's lives.

Re: your last point. I respect your view but am not so sure. If they close the schools the pupils will be at home and their parents may well be at work and therefore they may have to be looked after by their grandparents, who are probably more at risk than any other age group. Therefore the children risk passing on the virus to their grandparents. Whilst they are at school this is less likely to happen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 12:28:53 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:56:01 AM
Re: your last point. I respect your view but am not so sure. If they close the schools the pupils will be at home and their parents may well be at work and therefore they may have to be looked after by their grandparents, who are probably more at risk than any other age group. Therefore the children risk passing on the virus to their grandparents. Whilst they are at school this is less likely to happen.

I'm sorry, Jeffrey, but I have to disagree. If both children are grandparents stay home, the risk of infection is minimal. If both kids and teachers and parents and grandparents intersect in schools (not to mention the public transportation which probably many if not most of them use to get there) the risk is much higher.

What Boris Johnson does with his "herd immunity" approach is simply medical darwinism: the young and the healty will certainly survive, the middle-aged and healthy will most likely survive, the old and healthy will possibly survive, the old and sick will surely die, but hey, it's the price we got to pay for getting immunity --- and all the while the economy keeps going on. This is cynicism run amok.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 12:33:40 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 12:28:53 PM
I'm sorry, Jeffrey, but I have to disagree. If both children are grandparents stay home, the risk of infection is minimal. If both kids and teachers and parents and grandparents intersect in schools (not to mention the public transportation which probably many if not most of them use to get there) the risk is much higher.

What Boris Johnson does with his "herd immunity" approach is simply medical darwinism: the young and the healty will certainly survive, the middle-aged and healthy will most likely survive, the old and healthy will possibly survive, the old and sick will surely die, but hey, it's the price we got to pay for getting immunity --- and all the while the economy keeps going on. This is cynicism run amok.
Fair enough Andrei but the Chief Medical Officer said today that if one person in the house is infected then there is a very good chance that they will pass it on to others in the house.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 01:02:43 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 12:33:40 PM
the Chief Medical Officer said today that if one person in the house is infected then there is a very good chance that they will pass it on to others in the house.

That's absolutely true, happened in Romania, where a person infected all his family. But I ask you: when is the probabilty of infection higher, when all persons in a household interact with many other persons, or when only a few persons in the household do?

Btw, the number of infections in Romania would have been much smaller if some people returning from high risk countries would have told the truth to the authorities and got placed in quarantine, or would have not left the quarantine. Of the 168 cases reported as I'm typing, 42 are officially prosecuted for either lying about the countries they were returning from, or for leaving the quarantine. Go figure!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 01:56:32 PM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 16, 2020, 09:43:06 AM
I'm a translator, so I'm working with documents on my computer, and all of this depends on having a smooth flow of international business. Demand naturally fluctuates, that's the nature of this freelance job, but I have no idea how long the current slowdown will last. Teleconferencing is irrelevant to me personally.

The brewpub is planning to close this week until it becomes safe to reopen. It is a nice place, in fact they just celebrated their 10th anniversary. They've won a lot of awards over that decade.

https://www.lbbrew.com/
Looks like a cool place!  And I see that they really DO spin vinyl!   ;D Have you ever brought any of your own albums to listen to there?

Hope that things pick up for you soon to regarding translating.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 02:13:37 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:12:53 AM
The schools in the UK are staying open for now. I dislike Boris Johnson but think it is the right decision. If the school, where I teach, closes I will be expected to teach my classes by 'online video lessons' from home. Sounds like a total nightmare. Apparently my students will be able to see me but I will not be able to see them. I have a vision of trying to teach them from the living room of my house with the cat standing on the laptop keyboard and staring into the screen, as he often does, and my wife shouting from the kitchen for me to come and help with the washing up. I told my daughter about this nightmare scenario and her boss said that she wants to join my 'online lesson'.  ???
:laugh: Oh, dear!  But that is a funny image....sorry!   :)  Think that I'd worry more that my students would be so focused on my 'cute/amusing' cat that they wouldn't be listening to what I was saying!
*
Suggestions:  1) Kitty is to be (temporarily) barred from being in "X" room whilst you are teaching (make sure that food and water and favorite toys are elsewhere); 2) No communication allowed from family members whilst you are teaching (perhaps a note on the door to remind them)...short of an emergency, of course. 3) wondering whether or not you would need to have on hand some kind of dry-erase board?  Or do you use something like that in class at all?; 4) have a bottle of water nearby in event of a dry throat (is there a pause switch or could you go off-camera?) 5) turn off any landline phones in that room or temporarily unplug them; 6) have a good look in the mirror before having class; 7) clean your video/photo lens on the computer before class so no 'smudges'.   :)

*hopefull Kitty will not meow and/or scratch the door wanting to get into your room!

Schools closed here and a number of other organizations....some stores too either closing for either a couple of weeks, a few days, indefinitely?  I've received emails from a few businesses that I've signed up to and some of them are doing "curbside" sales:  some form of either order online or over the phone and they will meet you somewhere....could be entrance to the store...just outside...??
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 02:17:43 PM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 16, 2020, 10:20:50 AM
Restaurants are not an option anymore, so we're cooking (and having lots of fun coming up with recipes for meals we haven't had for ages). We've limited our shopping and try to plan ahead more, although we're not stocking up on anything. We've stitched together our own masks as most of the country is doing right now, including people making bunches of them for their local hospitals/retirement homes – the community really coming together is what gives me hope. I see neighbors helping each other and basically people acting in a sensible and unselfish way, now that they realized the true magnitude of this thing.

I can work my primary job from home, which makes things super easy for me, but I've got a lot of friends in the music/sound/theatre business who are suddenly without a paycheck, so we're trying to help them any way we can right now.

I respectfully disagree. This is gambling with people's lives.
Good to hear that you're having fun cooking!   :)  Wow, stitching your own masks?!  How do you know what to make them of and how effective they might be?  Obviously, something is better than nothing....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 16, 2020, 02:29:45 PM
First day of work from home.

This is just too good... so good that the next job I do I might only accept WFH positions... if possible...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 16, 2020, 02:51:11 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 02:17:43 PM
Good to hear that you're having fun cooking!   :)  Wow, stitching your own masks?!  How do you know what to make them of and how effective they might be?  Obviously, something is better than nothing....

Any mask will remind you not to touch your mouth or nose, and touching your mouth or nose after touching a contaminated surface is the most common mode of transmission. You can consciously avoid people who might sneeze in your direction, but it's almost impossible to remember not to touch your face.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 16, 2020, 03:07:28 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 01:56:32 PM
Looks like a cool place!  And I see that they really DO spin vinyl!   ;D Have you ever brought any of your own albums to listen to there?

Not yet, but I hope to when they reopen. Tuesday night is Vinyl Night, you can bring your own records and they will play them.

This came about because the previous manager was an indie rock fanatic, and he was spinning vinyl all the time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 16, 2020, 03:21:05 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 16, 2020, 02:51:11 PM
Any mask will remind you not to touch your mouth or nose, and touching your mouth or nose after touching a contaminated surface is the most common mode of transmission. You can consciously avoid people who might sneeze in your direction, but it's almost impossible to remember not to touch your face.

So true. The chief of the health authorities in our country on TV told the viewers several times to avoid touching the face, but he himself did it all the time - being nervous I think, but the result is equally bad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 16, 2020, 05:03:23 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 12:28:53 PM
I'm sorry, Jeffrey, but I have to disagree. If both children are grandparents stay home, the risk of infection is minimal. If both kids and teachers and parents and grandparents intersect in schools (not to mention the public transportation which probably many if not most of them use to get there) the risk is much higher.

What Boris Johnson does with his "herd immunity" approach is simply medical darwinism: the young and the healty will certainly survive, the middle-aged and healthy will most likely survive, the old and healthy will possibly survive, the old and sick will surely die, but hey, it's the price we got to pay for getting immunity --- and all the while the economy keeps going on. This is cynicism run amok.

Not quite.  The idea is to keep infection rates slower and old/sick as isolated as possible, until herd immunity develops. Meanwhile, if infection rate is manageable, hospitals will be able to provide ventilators and all other necessary care to the old/sick who do become infected.

In the US (not sure about elsewhere) the question of closing schools is complicated by the fact that schools serve not only as effective day care but also provide one or more meals per schoolday to kids from poor families. For these kids school means healthy food, possibly the main meals of the day.  So local authorities have to come up with alternate means of distributing meals and alternate day care for parents with no alternative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 16, 2020, 05:07:54 PM
FYI:
My brother is a doctor in Rochester, NY. This was his response (in personal e-mail) today to the standard "how's it going" question:

Crazy. Not a lot of cases yet but uncertainty and anxiety. The sad thing is that this illustrates how messed up our health care system is. The outfit that supplies our hospital with all personal protective gear was, until a few weeks ago, getting all of the materials from factories in Wuhan China. We have not gotten any of the results of the 250+ COVID tests and have just gotten the capacity to run the tests here today and capacity will only be about 100 a day.
The hospital and country are running out of gloves, masks and goggles.
Not a good scene.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2020, 05:16:13 PM
Quote from: T. D. on March 16, 2020, 05:07:54 PM
FYI:
My brother is a doctor in Rochester, NY. This was his response (in personal e-mail) today to the standard "how's it going" question:

Crazy. Not a lot of cases yet but uncertainty and anxiety. The sad thing is that this illustrates how messed up our health care system is. The outfit that supplies our hospital with all personal protective gear was, until a few weeks ago, getting all of the materials from factories in Wuhan China. We have not gotten any of the results of the 250+ COVID tests and have just gotten the capacity to run the tests here today and capacity will only be about 100 a day.
The hospital and country are running out of gloves, masks and goggles.
Not a good scene.


Oof!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 16, 2020, 05:40:26 PM

Governments are getting an F for their coronavirus response:

The UK:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/03/16/britain-coronavirus-disaster/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/03/16/britain-coronavirus-disaster/)

The USA:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/16/this-crisis-looks-worse-than-911-2008-collapse-will-we-finally-fix-our-politics/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/16/this-crisis-looks-worse-than-911-2008-collapse-will-we-finally-fix-our-politics/)

No real thumbs down on Trudeau from Canada's newspapers, except those from my province (Québec), but they are in French, so no link. But here's my assessment: F.

This analysis gives a very interesting perspective:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-first-coronavirus-error-was-complacency/ (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-first-coronavirus-error-was-complacency/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 16, 2020, 06:06:59 PM
Here is the problem in a nutshell:

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19809044/march_15.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2020, 09:18:02 PM
Here's the government's model, this is what is guiding their policy

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:48:29 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 16, 2020, 02:13:37 PM
:laugh: Oh, dear!  But that is a funny image....sorry!   :)  Think that I'd worry more that my students would be so focused on my 'cute/amusing' cat that they wouldn't be listening to what I was saying!
*
Suggestions:  1) Kitty is to be (temporarily) barred from being in "X" room whilst you are teaching (make sure that food and water and favorite toys are elsewhere); 2) No communication allowed from family members whilst you are teaching (perhaps a note on the door to remind them)...short of an emergency, of course. 3) wondering whether or not you would need to have on hand some kind of dry-erase board?  Or do you use something like that in class at all?; 4) have a bottle of water nearby in event of a dry throat (is there a pause switch or could you go off-camera?) 5) turn off any landline phones in that room or temporarily unplug them; 6) have a good look in the mirror before having class; 7) clean your video/photo lens on the computer before class so no 'smudges'.   :)

*hopefull Kitty will not meow and/or scratch the door wanting to get into your room!

Schools closed here and a number of other organizations....some stores too either closing for either a couple of weeks, a few days, indefinitely?  I've received emails from a few businesses that I've signed up to and some of them are doing "curbside" sales:  some form of either order online or over the phone and they will meet you somewhere....could be entrance to the store...just outside...??
Good advice. Thank you PD  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:51:04 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 16, 2020, 05:03:23 PM
Not quite.  The idea is to keep infection rates slower and old/sick as isolated as possible, until herd immunity develops. Meanwhile, if infection rate is manageable, hospitals will be able to provide ventilators and all other necessary care to the old/sick who do become infected.

In the US (not sure about elsewhere) the question of closing schools is complicated by the fact that schools serve not only as effective day care but also provide one or more meals per schoolday to kids from poor families. For these kids school means healthy food, possibly the main meals of the day.  So local authorities have to come up with alternate means of distributing meals and alternate day care for parents with no alternative.

That's a good point Jeffrey. I expect that the schools here may well close by the end of the week any way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:54:07 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2020, 01:02:43 PM
That's absolutely true, happened in Romania, where a person infected all his family. But I ask you: when is the probabilty of infection higher, when all persons in a household interact with many other persons, or when only a few persons in the household do?

Btw, the number of infections in Romania would have been much smaller if some people returning from high risk countries would have told the truth to the authorities and got placed in quarantine, or would have not left the quarantine. Of the 168 cases reported as I'm typing, 42 are officially prosecuted for either lying about the countries they were returning from, or for leaving the quarantine. Go figure!
Yes, I see your point of course Andrei and that's very bad about people not telling the truth about where they have been.

Lots of discussion about the schools situation on the BBC News this morning. One good point is that for children from a poorer background their school meal may well be their only hot meal of the day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:02:07 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:51:04 PM
That's a good point Jeffrey. I expect that the schools here may well close by the end of the week any way.

Shocking that the teachers unions have been once again so toothless, their members have been placed right on the front line, many of them are over 60 or have health problems.

The Imperial College report which is the best model we have suggests that social isolation will have to persist for at least 18 months, until a vaccine becomes available. If the schools in the UK close soon, it may be some time before they reopen permanently. There's lots of opportunity here for distance learning to be developed.

The childcare issue is a real one, no one will want to let the grandparents look after the kids, everyone knows the dangers, and not everyone has grandparents. I'm not at all sure what the possibilities are - people will take the kids into work I guess - or leave them to fend for themselves - children are very adaptable of course. But socially it's hard to see anything positive there. If it's right that closing schools doesn't have much of an impact on the epidemiology, it may be best to keep them open.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 12:06:55 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:02:07 AM
Shocking that the teachers unions have been once again so toothless, their members have been placed right on the front line, many of them are over 60 or have health problems.

The Imperial College report which is the best model we have suggests that social isolation will have to persist for at least 18 months, until a vaccine becomes available. If the schools in the UK close soon, it may be some time before they reopen permanently. There's lots of opportunity here for distance learning to be developed.

The childcare issue is a real one, no one will want to let the grandparents look after the kids, everyone knows the dangers. I'm not at all sure what the possibilities are - people will have to take the kids into work I guess - children are very adaptable of course.

Interesting. But if children are together in an ad hoc workplace daycare, how is that different from being together in a classroom?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:13:20 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 12:06:55 AM
Interesting. But if children are together in an ad hoc workplace daycare, how is that different from being together in a classroom?

I don't know if there's some epidemiological consequence of putting a lot of kids together in a school.


In the case of two parent families, one can stay at home of course. Like mat/pat leave. They'll be less well off but so be it. We're all going to be less well off, apart from Mother Courage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 12:15:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:13:20 AM
I don't know if there's some epidemiological consequence of putting a lot of kids together in a school.


I don't understand then. Why are schools being closed?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:20:21 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 12:15:58 AM
I don't understand then. Why are schools being closed?

They havent been  closed in the UK, and the argument has always been that closing them doesn't have a significant positive impact on mortality, and indeed may have a significant negative impact if vulnerable people get roped into the child care.


There was an interview in British TV yesterday where the health minister was asked why people should isolate themselves if the kids are coming home from school and infecting them - they may as well go to the pub since everyone's already infected. The answer was all to do with protecting the vulnerable groups - grannies looking after kids etc -  everything is focused on stopping the vulnerable groups  from ever catching the virus,

You see how complicated these questions are! Can you imagine what it's like to have to make these decisions?  Our leaders are going to earn their wages this year!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 17, 2020, 02:12:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 12:20:21 AM
They havent been  closed in the UK, and the argument has always been that closing them doesn't have a significant positive impact on mortality, and indeed may have a significant negative impact if vulnerable people get roped into the child care.


There was an interview in British TV yesterday where the health minister was asked why people should isolate themselves if the kids are coming home from school and infecting them - they may as well go to the pub since everyone's already infected. The answer was all to do with protecting the vulnerable groups - grannies looking after kids etc -  everything is focused on stopping the vulnerable groups  from ever catching the virus,

You see how complicated these questions are! Can you imagine what it's like to have to make these decisions?  Our leaders are going to earn their wages this year!

The Dutch government is (typically ;)) somewhere between Britain and the rest of Europe (like France, Spain, Italy): schools are closed, but there is no complete lockdown of/in the country. For the same reason as the Brits: protect the vulnerable groups, and let's give the stronger and healthy ones somehow the chance to build a natural 'group immunity' against the virus. (If I correct understandly, I'm not a medic.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:25:49 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 16, 2020, 05:03:23 PM
In the US (not sure about elsewhere) the question of closing schools is complicated by the fact that schools serve not only as effective day care but also provide one or more meals per schoolday to kids from poor families. For these kids school means healthy food, possibly the main meals of the day.  So local authorities have to come up with alternate means of distributing meals and alternate day care for parents with no alternative.

Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:54:07 PM
for children from a poorer background their school meal may well be their only hot meal of the day.

Wait a minute, Jeffrey and Jeffrey! Do you mean that in 2020 AD in two of the richest countries in the world there are still numerous families so poor that they can't even afford to feed their children and, absent the school meal(s), the poor kids would be starving?  :o :o :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:39:11 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 17, 2020, 02:12:00 AM
The Dutch government is (typically ;)) somewhere between Britain and the rest of Europe (like France, Spain, Italy): schools are closed, but there is no complete lockdown of/in the country.

Same here in Romania. The state of emergency has been instituted, kindergartens, schools and universities stay closed until after Easter (April 19), all those who can work from home. As of yet, no lockdown or traffic restrictions, but I think a responsible person doesn't need an official restriction in order not to go any more to restaurants, pubs, clubs or to criss cross the city, the county or the country without any pressing reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:40:32 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.

Oh, God! You should get in touch with the medical authorities in charge immediately and without delay. Best of luck and speedy recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 03:03:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:25:49 AM
Wait a minute, Jeffrey and Jeffrey! Do you mean that in 2020 AD in two of the richest countries in the world there are still numerous families so poor that they can't even afford to feed their children and, absent the school meal(s), the poor kids would be starving?  :o :o :o
Yes. There are children who come to school without having had food for breakfast and without bringing a meal with them. Most (many?) districts offer some form of free food to students who need it. But not all. And some teachers/school workers spend their own money so that the kids can eat.  Is it not shocking and truly unbelievable?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 03:08:30 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 03:03:44 AM
Yes. There are children who come to school without having had food for breakfast and without bringing a meal with them. Most (many?) districts offer some form of free food to students who need it. But not all. And some teachers/school workers spend their own money so that the kids can eat.  Is it not shocking and truly unbelievable?

Shocking and unbelievable, yes. I'm beggining to wonder whether Poju is actually right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 03:12:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 03:08:30 AM
Shocking and unbelievable, yes. I'm beggining to wonder whether Poju is actually right.
And if you want to see evidence of this, you can find clips of the Ellen show over the years where she gives away money to teachers and schools to help address this problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 03:39:00 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 03:12:55 AM
And if you want to see evidence of this, you can find clips of the Ellen show over the years where she gives away money to teachers and schools to help address this problem.

You told me it's true --- I need no more evidence (which I'm sure is widely available)

But really, this is not only shocking, it's also inacceptable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:01:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:25:49 AM
Wait a minute, Jeffrey and Jeffrey! Do you mean that in 2020 AD in two of the richest countries in the world there are still numerous families so poor that they can't even afford to feed their children and, absent the school meal(s), the poor kids would be starving?  :o :o :o

It may be negligent parenting rather than poverty.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 04:12:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:01:38 AM
It may be negligent parenting rather than poverty.

Please elaborate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 04:27:17 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:40:32 AM
Oh, God! You should get in touch with the medical authorities in charge immediately and without delay. Best of luck and speedy recovery!
The current advice given by the UK government is to only seek professional help if/when symptoms become severe. They are totally ignoring the WHO's simple advice of "test, test, test", instead telling people to simply stay at home if they exhibit any symptoms. The NHS has been in dire straits for some time now, and the government seems to be taking the cheapo approach to public health during this crisis also. Doubts as to Johnson's fitness for office will surely be redoubled many times over as the situation progresses.

The cough has steadily abated over the course of the morning, as it did yesterday, but it's too early to say one way or the other whether this is a pattern of escalation or simply "one of those things", in fact impossible since (afaik) the NHS is not at present offering or even able to offer routine testing. I'm still young and healthy so I'm not worried for myself, the real concern is that I will heighten the risk posed to my elderly grandmother, who relies on my mother and I for help with shopping and other errands. The plan at this point is simply to keep myself clean and out of other people's way as much as possible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:37:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 04:12:41 AM
Please elaborate.

Well they may not make sure that the children have a breakfast before going to school, for example. And in the evening they may just give them, for example, a cake to keep them quiet. Everyone here makes their own decisions about what to spend their money on, and how much attention to give their children.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 04:38:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 03:08:30 AM
Shocking and unbelievable, yes. I'm beggining to wonder whether Poju is actually right.

The story I heard was that unless you personally have a plan for fixing it then you shouldn't worry about it.

Remind me who said that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 04:41:20 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 04:27:17 AM
The current advice given by the UK government is to only seek professional help if/when symptoms become severe.

Iow, don't you dare call for professional help before it might be too late. I am shocked by the irresponsibility and cynicism of the UK government.

QuoteDoubts as to Johnson's fitness for office will surely be redoubled many times over as the situation progresses.

I have no doubts the man's insane and at least as dangerous as the virus itself.

QuoteThe cough has steadily abated over the course of the morning, as it did yesterday, but it's too early to say one way or the other whether this is a pattern of escalation or simply "one of those things", in fact impossible since (afaik) the NHS is not at present offering or even able to offer routine testing.

Yes, it might be just "one of those things" --- which I wish it were. But how can you know if you're not tested? And then, of course, the problem of potentially infecting your elderly relatives.

QuoteI'm still young and healthy so I'm not worried for myself,

Agreed.

Quote
the real concern is that I will heighten the risk posed to my elderly grandmother, who relies on my mother and I for help with shopping and other errands. The plan at this point is simply to keep myself clean and out of other people's way as much as possible.

A most wise plan, but I'm still shocked that the government itself has no plan whatsoever.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:43:27 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 04:41:20 AM


A most wise plan, but I'm still shocked that the government itself has no plan whatsoever.

But I posted  the Government's plan, that document from Imperial College is their plan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 04:44:57 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 04:38:23 AM
The story I heard was that unless you personally have a plan for fixing it then you shouldn't worry about it.

Remind me who said that.

I'm not worried about Americans or Brits accepting the current situation and you won't see me wringing my hands about it or copy-pasting articles about it and I'll sleep as usual tonight. t. I'm just saying that from my POV is inacceptable that they accept it. Whether they do something or not to address the problem is their business, not mine. I just expressed my view and move on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 05:23:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:01:38 AM
It may be negligent parenting rather than poverty.
It is typically either poverty - they don't have the money that day/week/whatever or broken families (drugs, abuse, etc.). Either way, a child who comes to school hungry simply will not be able to do much learning (certainly less than if they had a meal).

This is handled on a district by district level. In the district I live in, they are able to come to school a half hour early (for example) to get breakfast for free. During the corona thingy, the schools are doing a drive thru, where families can come to designated schools and pick up food at the curb.  But every school district has their own rules. I believe that most (if not all) big cities have a program.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 05:29:12 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 16, 2020, 02:51:11 PM
Any mask will remind you not to touch your mouth or nose, and touching your mouth or nose after touching a contaminated surface is the most common mode of transmission. You can consciously avoid people who might sneeze in your direction, but it's almost impossible to remember not to touch your face.
I heard other comments not long ago about you could actually end up touching your face more adjusting it from time to time, so??? :-\

PD

p.s.  I was using one outside not long ago (doing dusty yard work involving lawn mower) and I was constantly adjusting it and sometimes taking it off because it was so hot!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:43:00 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.
Hope you get better soon - and then you should be immune.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 17, 2020, 05:45:38 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:43:00 AM
Hope you get better soon - and then you should be immune.

+1. Take care!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 05:47:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 17, 2020, 04:37:44 AM
Everyone here makes their own decisions about what to spend their money on, and how much attention to give their children.

I'm perfectly fine with everyone making their own decisions about what to spend their money on as long as their decision affects only themselves and nobody else; the moment a drunkard husband starts beating his wife it's the duty of the State to intervene and say: you can drunk yourself to death if you so wish, by all means go ahead, but if you cannot and will not stop beating your wife then we'll see to it that you'd better fucking stay away from her or else. Likewise, if parents decide to give their children only minimal food to keep them quiet because they want their money spent on other things, then it's the duty of the State to intervene and say: you can of course spend your money on anything you want but since you cannot and will not take proper care of your own children then we'll see to it that they are properly taken care of by somebody else.

Blimey, it took this bloody coronavirus crisis to realize I'm much more left-leaning than I ever thoght.  :laugh:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:49:00 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 17, 2020, 02:12:00 AM
The Dutch government is (typically ;)) somewhere between Britain and the rest of Europe (like France, Spain, Italy): schools are closed, but there is no complete lockdown of/in the country. For the same reason as the Brits: protect the vulnerable groups, and let's give the stronger and healthy ones somehow the chance to build a natural 'group immunity' against the virus. (If I correct understandly, I'm not a medic.)
That sounds right to me. I noticed on the news yesterday that the Dutch government was following a not dissimilar policy to the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:56:37 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 02:25:49 AM
Wait a minute, Jeffrey and Jeffrey! Do you mean that in 2020 AD in two of the richest countries in the world there are still numerous families so poor that they can't even afford to feed their children and, absent the school meal(s), the poor kids would be starving?  :o :o :o

Children from poor families (and they do exist) may be eligible for free school meals and have a more nutritious diet than they get at home. The other dark issue is if the children are sent home into a situation of psychological/emotional neglect/abuse. There are many people around, and not only children, who feel safer and happier at school or work. This is a very difficult issue at the moment but there was an interesting discussion about it on the radio yesterday.

As a 60+ teacher I'm very aware of the risks of keeping the schools open but I do not think that the govt was necessarily wrong to do so.

By the way, I only represent the views of one Jeffrey here.   8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 17, 2020, 06:00:57 AM
Yesterday Canada closed its borders to all countries (meaning flights) except the USA. Much questions and criticism were raised as to why except the US from its emergency plan.

Word is that canadian authorities fear a trumpian anger fit (and its consequences) because that would be a confirmation that Trump denied, didn't anticipate, minimized and mismanaged the outbreak. For example, Canada has tested 25000 people so far. The USA has also tested 25000 people, but its population is 9 times larger. Clearly there is a prevalent state of unpreparedness and disorganization south of the border. Closing our border to the US would make Trump look bad. Very bad.

Why should that concern Trudeau and Canadians, then? 50% of our medical supplies come from the USA, and 80% of our commerce exchanges are with the US. A retaliatory move by Trump, such as keeping all med supplies for Americans only would be devastating to our health system's capacity to handle the crisis. Kind of Trump saying 'We're not going down alone'...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 06:02:32 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:56:37 AM
Children from poor families (and they do exist) may be eligible for free school meals and have a more nutritious diet than they get at home.

Note to SimonNZ: What I find inacceptable (from my own POV) is that such poor families still exist in one of the richest countries in the world, but if it is really a problem to be addressed it's for the UK people themselves to decide. I can only notice that apparently it's not, at least not for a critical mass of the UK people.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 17, 2020, 06:03:24 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 04:27:17 AM
The current advice given by the UK government is to only seek professional help if/when symptoms become severe. They are totally ignoring the WHO's simple advice of "test, test, test", instead telling people to simply stay at home if they exhibit any symptoms. The NHS has been in dire straits for some time now, and the government seems to be taking the cheapo approach to public health during this crisis also. Doubts as to Johnson's fitness for office will surely be redoubled many times over as the situation progresses.

The cough has steadily abated over the course of the morning, as it did yesterday, but it's too early to say one way or the other whether this is a pattern of escalation or simply "one of those things", in fact impossible since (afaik) the NHS is not at present offering or even able to offer routine testing. I'm still young and healthy so I'm not worried for myself, the real concern is that I will heighten the risk posed to my elderly grandmother, who relies on my mother and I for help with shopping and other errands. The plan at this point is simply to keep myself clean and out of other people's way as much as possible.
Yes, the seems to be the most sensible approach. I wish you a speedy and full recovery.

Bon courage!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:07:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 03:08:30 AM
Shocking and unbelievable, yes. I'm beggining to wonder whether Poju is actually right.

     There is no question that he is right. Just look at the personal nature of the responses to his observations, which focus on how radical a source he uses is and how unreasonably blinkered he is about a politician.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on March 17, 2020, 06:16:43 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 04:27:17 AM
The cough has steadily abated over the course of the morning, as it did yesterday, but it's too early to say one way or the other whether this is a pattern of escalation or simply "one of those things", in fact impossible since (afaik) the NHS is not at present offering or even able to offer routine testing. I'm still young and healthy so I'm not worried for myself, the real concern is that I will heighten the risk posed to my elderly grandmother, who relies on my mother and I for help with shopping and other errands. The plan at this point is simply to keep myself clean and out of other people's way as much as possible.

Good luck!

My brother (in his sixties) had to be hospitalised with it, but now seems on the mend and imminently to be allowed home. His wife also picked it up at the same scientific conference in Boston, but went to France to visit her mother straight after before either of them knew, and is now stranded there. Her symptoms, though unpleasant, were not as bad and her fever now finally seems to have turned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 17, 2020, 06:20:46 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 05:56:37 AM
Children from poor families (and they do exist) may be eligible for free school meals and have a more nutritious diet than they get at home. The other dark issue is if the children are sent home into a situation of psychological/emotional neglect/abuse. There are many people around, and not only children, who feel safer and happier at school or work.

Exactly the situation in Belgium.
P.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 17, 2020, 06:22:23 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 17, 2020, 06:20:46 AM
Exactly the situation in Belgium.
P.

Same here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 06:41:06 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:07:13 AM
     There is no question that he is right. Just look at the personal nature of the responses to his observations, which focus on how radical a source he uses is and how unreasonably blinkered he is about a politician.

C'est le ton qui fait la chanson . I think that not even you can seriously deny that saying "I'm right about cause X and all those who disagree with me are just idiots/brainswashed/ill-willed" can make a rational person sympathetic to cause X recoil in horror.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 06:44:46 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 17, 2020, 06:20:46 AM
Exactly the situation in Belgium.
P.

OMG!!! The Western World is much more amiss than I've ever thought it was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 17, 2020, 06:48:00 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.

Be sure to call a doctor though if you really begin to suffer from breathing difficulties.
Stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 17, 2020, 06:48:27 AM
With or without corona:

The threat of becoming poor continues to hang over Belgians, according to the latest Statbel figures, which show that in 2018, just over 16% of the country's inhabitants risked financial poverty.

This is the highest level since 2004, when such measurements were begun, according to the national statistical office.

The poverty risk is calculated on the basis of available income. Anyone living in a household with a monthly available income of less than 1,187 euros (for a single person) is considered at risk. Last year, 16.4% of the Belgian population belonged to this category, up from 15.9% in 2017.

Unsurprisingly, the poverty risk is higher among homeless persons (49.4%) than among workers (5.2%). Other high-risk categories include single-parent families and renters. People with at best a lower-secondary diploma are four times more likely to become poor than those with higher diplomas (27.8% as against 6.4%).

According to Statbel, 12.1% of the population were in households with low labour intensity in 2018, down from 13.5% in 2017. The proportion of Belgians suffering from severe material deprivation also decreased slightly, from 5.1% in 2017 to 4.9% in 2018.

Persons facing at least one of the high-risk situations are considered at risk of poverty or social exclusion, according to the European Poverty Indicator, developed within the framework of the "Europe 2020 Strategy. In 2018, they comprised 19.8% of the population, as against 20.3% in 2017.

Oscar Schneider
The Brussels Times
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:49:53 AM
    We (there can be only 2) were supposed to fly to Paris in May. Oh well.....

Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 06:41:06 AM
C'est le ton qui fait la chanson . I think that not even you can seriously deny that saying "I'm right about cause X and all those who disagree with me are just idiots/brainswashed/ill-willed" can make a rational person sympathetic to cause X recoil in horror.

     Did you just do that? Since when is recoiling in horror an argument? I understood your wonder as expressing the opposite view.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 06:54:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 16, 2020, 10:48:29 PM
Good advice. Thank you PD  :)
Or, you could print out a copy of this and paste it onto a board and then hold it up in front of you and do the talking behind it.   :D

(https://kittybloger.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cats-love-computers-4.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 06:55:04 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.
Please take good care of yourself and all good wishes too towards your family and friends.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:55:43 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 17, 2020, 06:48:27 AM
With or without corona:

The threat of becoming poor continues to hang over Belgians, according to the latest Statbel figures, which show that in 2018, just over 16% of the country's inhabitants risked financial poverty.

This is the highest level since 2004, when such measurements were begun, according to the national statistical office.

The poverty risk is calculated on the basis of available income. Anyone living in a household with a monthly available income of less than 1,187 euros (for a single person) is considered at risk. Last year, 16.4% of the Belgian population belonged to this category, up from 15.9% in 2017.

Unsurprisingly, the poverty risk is higher among homeless persons (49.4%) than among workers (5.2%). Other high-risk categories include single-parent families and renters. People with at best a lower-secondary diploma are four times more likely to become poor than those with higher diplomas (27.8% as against 6.4%).

According to Statbel, 12.1% of the population were in households with low labour intensity in 2018, down from 13.5% in 2017. The proportion of Belgians suffering from severe material deprivation also decreased slightly, from 5.1% in 2017 to 4.9% in 2018.

Persons facing at least one of the high-risk situations are considered at risk of poverty or social exclusion, according to the European Poverty Indicator, developed within the framework of the "Europe 2020 Strategy. In 2018, they comprised 19.8% of the population, as against 20.3% in 2017.

Oscar Schneider
The Brussels Times

     However convenient a poverty class may be in normal times (I don't think at all, others disagree), it's very dangerous in a crisis like this one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 07:52:22 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 06:54:11 AM
Or, you could print out a copy of this and paste it onto a board and then hold it up in front of you and do the talking behind it.   :D

(https://kittybloger.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cats-love-computers-4.jpg)
Brilliant! Excellent plan.
8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 17, 2020, 07:59:28 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 17, 2020, 06:48:00 AM
Be sure to call a doctor though if you really begin to suffer from breathing difficulties.
Stay safe!

Precisely what I also would say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 17, 2020, 08:08:03 AM
Not much is known about the situation in Russia, as the government keeps mum on the subject. A CBC article says it's a time bomb.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 08:42:15 AM
Quote from: Crudblud on March 17, 2020, 01:16:47 AM
Seems like I got me the ol' corona cough. Two mornings running I've had an irritation on my chest and throat, yesterday it cleared up as the day progressed but it is much more pronounced this morning. It's not a big deal in terms of self-isolation since I'm quite a solitary person and have worked from home for a number of years, but I am nonetheless concerned about disrupting family business with my viral shenanigans.

Mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 08:49:03 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:07:13 AM
     There is no question that he is right. Just look at the personal nature of the responses to his observations, which focus on how radical a source he uses is and how unreasonably blinkered he is about a politician.

Nothing about the responses which acknowledge that there are problems to be addressed, but that the question is just how they may practically addressed?

You're right: there's no question that he's right,  he hasn't a clue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 09:00:15 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:49:53 AM
I understood your wonder as expressing the opposite view.

If I ask "hoyougonnadoit" (to borrow your favorite exoression) it doesn't follow I'm against "doing it". On the contrary, it might  mean I would like it done as quickly as possible in the real world.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 09:07:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2020, 08:49:03 AM
the question is just how they may practically addressed?

Precisely. As long as there will be starving children*, the question is not what is the best government which does not result in starving children, but rather how can starving children be fed.

Answer: starving children need food, not posts/articles/hand-wringing about their getting food.

* ie, until kingdom come
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 09:20:10 AM
Stop & Shop offering special hours for coronavirus high risk shoppers (https://www.newsbreak.com/news/0ORwh1HV/stop-shop-offering-special-hours-for-coronavirus-high-risk-shoppers?s=oldSite&ss=a1)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 09:28:23 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 06:55:04 AM
Please take good care of yourself and all good wishes too towards your family and friends.

Amen to the above!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 09:33:47 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 06:55:43 AM
     However convenient a poverty class may be in normal times

I fail to see how poverty can be convenient, except as a permanent electoral reservoir for some leftists. Just come to think of it: if everybody will be lift off poverty most leftists will be left (pun) without argument.

Note to drogulus: if you have something to post about coronavirus, I'll be glad to reply. If not, I won't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 09:37:42 AM
Really annoyed here!  I'm trying to be good and stay home most of the time and my doorbell rings:  it's a guy from an energy company wanting to talk to me about switching providers!  I told him I was trying to keep a 6 foot distance due to the virus!  And he's about 2 feet away from me and going around door to door during this epidemic!  What the h*%l is that company thinking?!   >:(

And I hate solicitations/marketers to begin with!  >:(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 09:38:17 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 09:37:42 AM
Really annoyed here!  I'm trying to be good and stay home most of the time and my doorbell rings:  it's a guy from an energy company wanting to talk to me about switching providers!  I told him I was trying to keep a 6 foot distance due to the virus!  And he's about 2 feet away from me and going around door to door during this epidemic!  What the h*%l is that company thinking?!   >:(

And I hate solicitations/marketers to begin with!  >:(

PD

Yeesh!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 09:42:15 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 09:37:42 AM
Really annoyed here!  I'm trying to be good and stay home most of the time and my doorbell rings:  it's a guy from an energy company wanting to talk to me about switching providers!  I told him I was trying to keep a 6 foot distance due to the virus!  And he's about 2 feet away from me and going around door to door during this epidemic!  What the h*%l is that company thinking?!   >:(

And I hate solicitations/marketers to begin with!  >:(

PD
I never open the door to people I don't know. Period. You can ask questions through the door if necessary. When was the last time a stranger came to your door and it was really important that you hear it (and the person was not in a fire or police uniform)? Exactly....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 09:43:09 AM
Quote from: André on March 17, 2020, 08:08:03 AM
Not much is known about the situation in Russia, as the government keeps mum on the subject.

Vodka kills every known virus in the world, said Yeltsyn who engendered Putin.

So there.

;D ;D ;D

Seriously now, I don't trust Russians even when they say "Good Day!"

;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 09:49:19 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 09:37:42 AM
Really annoyed here!  I'm trying to be good and stay home most of the time and my doorbell rings:  it's a guy from an energy company wanting to talk to me about switching providers!  I told him I was trying to keep a 6 foot distance due to the virus!  And he's about 2 feet away from me and going around door to door during this epidemic!  What the h*%l is that company thinking?!   >:(

And I hate solicitations/marketers to begin with!  >:(

PD

You should have started coughing and complaining about your runny nose.... >:D

I live in a townhouse, and am usually upstairs,  So when the (now relatively rare) solicitor comes around,  I open up the front bedroom window and talk to them from there.

A few months ago, the man running against the incumbent mayor of my city came around, going door to door in anticipation of the election (which is today).  First time a politician has come to my door in a while.  I ended up voting for him.  Both as a courtesy for the door to door campaign, and because the incumbent is doing a huge number of mailings, most negative.  I go by the rule that if a person spends a lot of money to get elected, then that person is not someone I want in office.  He (or she) wants it to badly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 10:06:56 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 09:49:19 AM
I go by the rule that if a person spends a lot of money to get elected, then that person is not someone I want in office. 

Agreed wholeheartedly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 17, 2020, 10:28:43 AM
It's just starting to sink in here how long this thing may last

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/3/17/21181694/coronavirus-covid-19-lockdowns-end-how-long-months-years

And I'm running out of beer.   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 10:37:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2020, 09:38:17 AM
Yeesh!
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 09:42:15 AM
I never open the door to people I don't know. Period. You can ask questions through the door if necessary. When was the last time a stranger came to your door and it was really important that you hear it (and the person was not in a fire or police uniform)? Exactly....

Silly me!  I had at first thought that it was someone from a utility company or maybe census bureau on official (necessary) business.  And yes, next time I'll answer through the door's crack...at least 'til things have calmed down.   :(

I did let the police know and the officer who answered the non-emergency number agreed that it was not a smart thing for the guy to be doing at this point in time and would talk to their supervisor about that; and, hopefully,  if they found him would suggest that to him.  I tried calling the company first, but I must have gotten the name of it incorrectly as they said that they would never send people around like that.  Anyhoo....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 10:38:34 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 09:49:19 AM
You should have started coughing and complaining about your runny nose.... >:D

I live in a townhouse, and am usually upstairs,  So when the (now relatively rare) solicitor comes around,  I open up the front bedroom window and talk to them from there.

A few months ago, the man running against the incumbent mayor of my city came around, going door to door in anticipation of the election (which is today).  First time a politician has come to my door in a while.  I ended up voting for him.  Both as a courtesy for the door to door campaign, and because the incumbent is doing a huge number of mailings, most negative.  I go by the rule that if a person spends a lot of money to get elected, then that person is not someone I want in office.  He (or she) wants it to badly.
Oh, that would have been way way too cruel!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 10:44:57 AM
Quote from: Daverz on March 17, 2020, 10:28:43 AM
I'm running out of beer.   :(

I'm beginning to run out of my next-to-last barrel of home-made wine.

I promised myself --- and I will keep my promise, so help me my wife! --- not to open the last barrel before Easter (April 19, that is). So if I run out of wine I'll go the beer route --- I don't know about USA but here in Romanai there's never going to be any shortage of beer.

Really. folks --- in the last few weeks I realized that Romania may look like an Eastern Europe backward country to foreigners but to myself, accustomed as I am to Romania inside out, it looks like one of the best countries to be in right now. I mean, 184 infections, 18 people cured and not a single death in 3 weeks doesn't look that bad, eh?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:49:34 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 10:37:24 AM
Silly me!  I had at first thought that it was someone from a utility company or maybe census bureau on official (necessary) business.  And yes, next time I'll answer through the door's crack...at least 'til things have calmed down.   :(

I did let the police know and the officer who answered the non-emergency number agreed that it was not a smart thing for the guy to be doing at this point in time and would talk to their supervisor about that; and, hopefully,  if they found him would suggest that to him.  I tried calling the company first, but I must have gotten the name of it incorrectly as they said that they would never send people around like that.  Anyhoo....

If they denied knowing about it, he may have been a scam artist.  In which case the police really do need to find him!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:52:24 AM
Quote from: Daverz on March 17, 2020, 10:28:43 AM
It's just starting to sink in here how long this thing may last

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/3/17/21181694/coronavirus-covid-19-lockdowns-end-how-long-months-years

And I'm running out of beer.   :(

The article includes a picture of Fort Lauderdale Beach.  My original plans for today (I was scheduled off from work) included a nice walk there.  The weather here is perfect--no rain, lows aboug 70F, highs in the mid80s--for the beach.

Sigh.....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 10:55:30 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:52:24 AM
a nice walk there.  The weather here is perfect-

Talk about *I want it all and I want it now!*   :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:59:35 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 10:55:30 AM
Talk about *I want it all and I want it now!*   :laugh:

Yes, but I hardly ever go to the beach.  Either it's raining, or it's the middle of snowbird season, or it's summer and it's too dang hot out to enjoy being outside.  Even if the outside is the ocean surf.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 11:05:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 10:44:57 AM
I'm beginning to run out of my next-to-last barrel of home-made wine.

I promised myself --- and I will keep my promise, so help me my wife! --- not to open the last barrel before Easter (April 19, that is). So if I run out of wine I'll go the beer route --- I don't know about USA but here in Romanai there's never going to be any shortage of beer.

Really. folks --- in the last few weeks I realized that Romania may look like an Eastern Europe backward country to foreigners but to myself, accustomed as I am to Romania inside out, it looks like one of the best countries to be in right now. I mean, 184 infections, 18 people cured and not a single death in 3 weeks doesn't look that bad, eh?



May the mildness continue!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 11:07:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2020, 11:05:42 AM
May the mildness continue!

Thanks, to USA as well!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 11:10:02 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:59:35 AM
I hardly ever go to the beach.  Either it's raining, or it's the middle of snowbird season, or it's summer and it's too dang hot out to enjoy being outside.  Even if the outside is the ocean surf.

Then it's really a trifle for you staying home. Listening all day long to music --- must be heaven, aint'it it?

Really now...

If you had asked most of the very same people who are now forced to work from home, they'd have told you they unfortunately had no time to spend with their children due to their job consumming most of their time. Now that they are forced to work from home, they complain about not being able to work normally. But, for God's sake, now they are forced to spend most of their time at home, with their chidlren -- so what are they complaining about?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 11:21:38 AM
Quote from: Daverz on March 17, 2020, 10:28:43 AM
It's just starting to sink in here how long this thing may last

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/3/17/21181694/coronavirus-covid-19-lockdowns-end-how-long-months-years

And I'm running out of beer.   :(

Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 11:32:10 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:49:34 AM
If they denied knowing about it, he may have been a scam artist.  In which case the police really do need to find him!
Could be, or could be I just got the energy company's name wrong too!
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 10:52:24 AM
The article includes a picture of Fort Lauderdale Beach.  My original plans for today (I was scheduled off from work) included a nice walk there.  The weather here is perfect--no rain, lows aboug 70F, highs in the mid80s--for the beach.

Sigh.....
Sorry, it sounds like it would have been a lovely walk!  I hope to go out for one myself--though not on a beach.  So, go stretch your legs...any parks nearby?   :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 17, 2020, 11:38:05 AM
We Americans know how to protect ourselves during the Trump virus pandemic:

https://time.com/5804562/coronavirus-fears-gun-sales/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 17, 2020, 11:39:11 AM
Quote from: André on March 17, 2020, 08:08:03 AM
Not much is known about the situation in Russia, as the government keeps mum on the subject. A CBC article says it's a time bomb.

The silence is worrying, to say the least, although I was wondering if geographical separation of large cities might play a positive role over there?

Went emergency shopping (read: we ran out of wine) today. My mask was in the washing machine so a scarf had to do.

(https://i.imgur.com/gEif4s7.jpg)

Felt a strong urge to shout "everybody be cool, this is a robbery!" when entering the supermarket.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 11:51:15 AM
I am not a doctor or biologist or virologist. I'm an engineer, so take all my comments cum grano salis.

Quote from: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdfThe global impact of COVID-19 has been profound, and the public health threat it represents  is the most serious seen in a respiratory virus since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

1918, really? How about 1968 Hong Kong flu? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_flu_pandemic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_flu_pandemic)

QuoteHere we present the results of epidemiological modelling which has informed policymaking in the UK and other countries in recent weeks

Recent weeks, that is 3 (three) weeks. In these three weeks Italy has witnessed a national tragedy. Epidemiological modelling with respect to Italy is completely irrelevant since during the same three weeks Romania has confirmed 184 cases and not a single death
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 11:54:53 AM
QuoteIn the absence of a COVID-19 vaccine, we assess the potential role of a number of public  health  measures –so-called  non-pharmaceutical  interventions  (NPIs) –aimed  at  reducing contactrates in the population and thereby reducing transmission of the virus. In the results presented here, we apply a previously published microsimulation model to two countries: the UK (Great Britain specifically) and the US.

Let's see that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 11:59:22 AM
QuoteTwo fundamental strategies are possible: (a) mitigation, which focuses on slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread

"slowing but not necessarily stopping" --- what medical authority gets to decide?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 12:02:35 PM
Quotesuppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case  numbers to low  levels  and  maintaining  that  situation  indefinitely

Who gets to decide it's indefinitedly?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 12:08:21 PM
QuoteWe find that that optimal mitigation policies (combining home isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths  by  half. However, the  resulting  mitigated  epidemic  would  still likely  result  in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems (most notably intensive care units) being overwhelmed many times over. For countries able to achieve it, this leaves suppression as the preferred policy option.

IOW, medical darwinism is the preferred policy option: whoever will survive will get stronger and good for them!, whoever will die bad luck for them!.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 17, 2020, 12:16:32 PM
To be continued,

Feel free to comment meanwhile.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 01:15:27 PM
A bit of (mostly) humor (add a 'u' if you must) to try and lighten things up here for a brief moment anyway.  From the tennis world (various players, organizations, etc.) after the announcement that Roland Garros (the French Open) had been moved to the end of September and on dealing with the virus, quarantine, etc....

https://twitter.com/TennysSandgren/status/1238155503345135617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1238155503345135617&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.atptour.com%2Fen%2Fnews%2Fwawrinka-cilic-best-social-media-post-march-2020
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 01:23:56 PM
Not the news Italy needs:

Coronavirus news: death toll in Italy rises by 16% in 24 hours (https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/mar/17/coronavirus-live-news-updates-uk-us-australia-europe-france-italy-who-self-isolation-travel-bans-borders-latest-update)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 01:29:26 PM
IRS gives Americans 3-month break to file taxes
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
Finland started to take political actions this week and it feels like we are at war against Corona. I'm nervous for my dad, 81 who is alone home avoiding all social contacts. I don't care about US politics right now. I have enough problems in my life. I feel my "quota" is full. I concentrate on my own well-being now. Sure, Finland is a well-functioning society with good infrastructure to deal with problems like this, but it's serious nevertheless. Just week ago my life was quite normal. Now I am planning my grocery store visits to minimaze interactions with other people... ...so I have no energy and interest to follow "latest polls" in primary states etc. stuff.

Fuck China for creating this mess!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 03:15:04 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2020, 01:29:26 PM
IRS gives Americans 3-month break to file taxes
Pardon, but I'm not quite certain if your comment is totally accurate Karl.  One article that I looked at on a news website said that one still needed to file on time, but it sounded like one might (depending upon eligibility?) then not have to pay (if you do owe) the amount due for 90 days without incurring interest and/or penalties?

I'd advise anyone to check with either your (if you have one) tax preparer and/or the IRS website (might not be up to date yet as far as I can see?).  And also check with your state to see if they are offering any breaks too.

Hard to keep up with all of the news and ideas at the moment!  No criticism meant too Karl.  I'm struggling at this end to follow all of the news, possible breaks, economic stimuli, etc.!

Confused at this end,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 03:23:32 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 03:15:04 PM
Pardon, but I'm not quite certain if your comment is totally accurate Karl.  One article that I looked at on a news website said that one still needed to file on time, but it sounded like one might (depending upon eligibility?) then not have to pay (if you do owe) the amount due for 90 days without incurring interest and/or penalties?

I'd advise anyone to check with either your (if you have one) tax preparer and/or the IRS website (might not be up to date yet as far as I can see?).  And also check with your state to see if they are offering any breaks too.

Hard to keep up with all of the news and ideas at the moment!  No criticism meant too Karl.  I'm struggling at this end to follow all of the news, possible breaks, economic stimuli, etc.!

Confused at this end,

PD

It's all confusing, and all that you'ved said, taken in good part, P.D.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 03:24:20 PM
Last of the 50 states to do so, W. Virginia confirms its first case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:31:13 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 03:15:04 PM
Pardon, but I'm not quite certain if your comment is totally accurate Karl.  One article that I looked at on a news website said that one still needed to file on time, but it sounded like one might (depending upon eligibility?) then not have to pay (if you do owe) the amount due for 90 days without incurring interest and/or penalties?

I'd advise anyone to check with either your (if you have one) tax preparer and/or the IRS website (might not be up to date yet as far as I can see?).  And also check with your state to see if they are offering any breaks too.

Hard to keep up with all of the news and ideas at the moment!  No criticism meant too Karl.  I'm struggling at this end to follow all of the news, possible breaks, economic stimuli, etc.!

Confused at this end,

PD
According to this, we still have to file by 4/15, but that might be changed.
https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/tax-compliance/news/21129660/2020-tax-season-payment-deadline-extended-to-july-15-as-nation-fights-coronavirus-irs-news
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 03:38:21 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:31:13 PM
According to this, we still have to file by 4/15, but that might be changed.
https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/tax-compliance/news/21129660/2020-tax-season-payment-deadline-extended-to-july-15-as-nation-fights-coronavirus-irs-news
Thanks JBS.  Must keep quite (even more so) informed and up-to-date these days!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:45:33 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
Finland started to take political actions this week and it feels like we are at war against Corona. I'm nervous for my dad, 81 who is alone home avoiding all social contacts. I don't care about US politics right now. I have enough problems in my life. I feel my "quota" is full. I concentrate on my own well-being now. Sure, Finland is a well-functioning society with good infrastructure to deal with problems like this, but it's serious nevertheless. Just week ago my life was quite normal. Now I am planning my grocery store visits to minimaze interactions with other people... ...so I have no energy and interest to follow "latest polls" in primary states etc. stuff.

Fuck China for creating this mess!


That's not very different from what is going on here, and many other places. May you and your father stay safe and healthy.

Among other things the panic buyers in my area have all bought up is laundry detergent.  I have told the German word for panic buying like that is Hamsterkauf. I hope it is, because it is so fitting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 03:56:30 PM
Heh.

Coronavirus scare: When will 'hamsterkauf' become an English word? (https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-scare-when-will-hamsterkauf-become-an-english-word/a-52635400)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 04:07:35 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:45:33 PM
That's not very different from what is going on here, and many other places. May you and your father stay safe and healthy.

Among other things the panic buyers in my area have all bought up is laundry detergent.  I have told the German word for panic buying like that is Hamsterkauf. I hope it is, because it is so fitting.
I noticed that a week ago or so too!  I was perplexed at first.  I told one of the employees there that I was surprised and he mentioned that people were trying to avoid coming in to shop so often; I replied that I was just getting very low on detergent.   :(  I have since managed to acquire some more.

And I like that German term!  Very appropriate!   ;D

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 04:11:42 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
Finland started to take political actions this week and it feels like we are at war against Corona. I'm nervous for my dad, 81 who is alone home avoiding all social contacts....

I wish all of the best for you, your family, friends, and country.  We're all facing uncharted waters and it's scary; you're not alone.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 04:19:12 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:45:33 PM
That's not very different from what is going on here, and many other places. May you and your father stay safe and healthy.

Among other things the panic buyers in my area have all bought up is laundry detergent.  I have told the German word for panic buying like that is Hamsterkauf. I hope it is, because it is so fitting.
I saw that yesterday morning too, but then I've seen some on the shelves yesterday afternoon and today. So maybe just slow to put more back. What is really a problem is getting meat. They sell out of chicken within an hour of putting it out. Though, they did still have ground meat. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 04:37:15 PM
     I'm doing nothing as hard as I can. Ordinarily I do it effortlessly.

     
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
I don't care about US politics right now. I have enough problems in my life.

     That's disappointing. I hope you come back with a sword in your hand. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 17, 2020, 04:53:44 PM
First case in the city:

Coronavirus in NZ: Tourist faces deportation after arriving in Christchurch without self-isolation plans (https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12317501)

"A tourist who arrived in New Zealand yesterday is being deported after officials found she had no clear plans to self-isolate amid escalating coronavirus fears.

The woman checked in to Rucksacker backpackers hostel in Christchurch last night wearing a face mask.

She did not show any flu symptoms nor had she mixed with other hostel residents, it's understood.

The hostel manager, who asked not to be named, said the woman, who was apparently travelling on her own for a fortnight trip and had a pre-existing booking, was checked in to a private room.

But this morning, Ministry of Health officials arrived at the hostel to question the woman about her self-isolation plans, before police officers showed up to take her away.

"She was a little bit stressed out but she wasn't creating a scene or anything," the hostel manager told the Herald.

"I got told that she was being taken to be put on a plane."

The manager was told by officials that the woman's self-isolation plans were not thorough enough for her to stay in the country.

The manager did not know what country she had arrived from or where she was being sent to.

"I don't think she would have contaminated anybody but I guess it's just a precaution," she said.

"It was a very eventful morning. It's a quiet wee hostel, we don't really get things like this happening. [The other guests] were fine, they were just curious as to what was going on. No-one was panicky or anything."

Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield confirmed the plan to deport the woman at his daily press conference - and said spot checks on other travellers would start from today.

"There was a traveller who came in yesterday ... who was unwilling to commit to self-isolating for the two-week period, and said her intention was to continue with her travels," he said.

"That person has been found and still appears to be unwilling. So the intention is therefore to deport that person."

Bloomfield said the case was unique so far.

"There has been the odd person who has come through and perhaps expressed the view they weren't going to self-isolate, and they've been spoken to and convinced that it is the right thing to do.


"We are also starting, from today, the spot checks on people who are self-isolating, just to help reassure us and other New Zealanders that people are doing the right thing."

Bloomfield said he had some sympathy for travellers whose plans to see Aotearoa were upended, but the restrictions were vital.

"I can understand why someone who might have planned a trip for a long time - two weeks to New Zealand - might be disappointed to arrive and find, right at the 11th hour, that they can't travel around the country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 05:31:48 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:45:33 PM
That's not very different from what is going on here, and many other places. May you and your father stay safe and healthy.

Thanks. I wish the same to you.

Quote from: JBS on March 17, 2020, 03:45:33 PMAmong other things the panic buyers in my area have all bought up is laundry detergent.  I have told the German word for panic buying like that is Hamsterkauf. I hope it is, because it is so fitting.

https://qz.com/

There are even empty supermarket shelves in Germany amid the coronavirus outbreak, and of course there's a good German word to describe the act of panic hoarding.

The word Hamsterkauf, a noun made up of "hoarding" (hamstern) and "buy" (kaufen) has been trending on social media as people share photos of store shelves cleared out of food and other household items. The word "hamstern" comes from the hamster, which stores food in its cheeks.


We have the word "hamstrata" / "hamstraus" in Finnish language meaning "to hoard" / "hoarding."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 05:41:00 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 05:31:48 PM
Thanks. I wish the same to you.

https://qz.com/ (https://qz.com/)

There are even empty supermarket shelves in Germany amid the coronavirus outbreak, and of course there's a good German word to describe the act of panic hoarding.

The word Hamsterkauf, a noun made up of "hoarding" (hamstern) and "buy" (kaufen) has been trending on social media as people share photos of store shelves cleared out of food and other household items. The word "hamstern" comes from the hamster, which stores food in its cheeks.


We have the word "hamstrata" / "hamstraus" in Finnish language meaning "to hoard" / "hoarding."


Best wishes, Poju!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2020, 05:53:32 PM
5 States Have Postponed Their Primaries Because Of The Coronavirus (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/5-states-have-postponed-their-primaries-because-of-the-coronavirus/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 05:56:15 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
Finland started to take political actions this week and it feels like we are at war against Corona. I'm nervous for my dad, 81 who is alone home avoiding all social contacts. I don't care about US politics right now. I have enough problems in my life. I feel my "quota" is full. I concentrate on my own well-being now. Sure, Finland is a well-functioning society with good infrastructure to deal with problems like this, but it's serious nevertheless. Just week ago my life was quite normal. Now I am planning my grocery store visits to minimaze interactions with other people... ...so I have no energy and interest to follow "latest polls" in primary states etc. stuff.

Fuck China for creating this mess!


I can certainly understand the feeling. I do hope things will be on the upswing. All the best to you and your loved ones, Poju.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 17, 2020, 07:05:33 PM
Here is another explanation for the psychology of resisting social/physical distancing (I agree with the article -  I dislike the term social distancing):
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/crowded-bars-and-theme-parks-why-won-t-some-people-practice-social-distancing-during-coronavirus-outbreak/ar-BB11hsfy?ocid=msedgntp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 17, 2020, 07:13:42 PM
Things have continued  to develop here in Australia.

This morning the PM and his chief health officer told the public that schools would not be closing which is very sensible given that a school is, in effect, a contained environment as opposed to being out in the public arena. The crowd limit is now 500 (outside) and 100 (inside) for non-essential gatherings. Essential gatherings include schools, shopping centres, hospitals, etc.

He also took a swipe at the 'hoarders' describing it as unAustralian! He has also told Aussies not to travel overseas. Anyone entering Australia is required to go into immediate 14 day self-isolation or be deported.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 07:14:55 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 17, 2020, 04:11:42 PM
I wish all of the best for you, your family, friends, and country.  We're all facing uncharted waters and it's scary; you're not alone.

Best wishes,

PD

Thanks!  0:)

Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 04:37:15 PM
          That's disappointing. I hope you come back with a sword in your hand. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

I really believed in Bernie's changes and before the establishment got behind Biden things looked good. Fighting the whole establishment was too much. Money won again. people and the planet lost again. Progressives are TOTALLY demoralized by this. We don't see hope at all. The establishment just has almost all the power in the oligarchy. I don't know what to do. That's why I concentrate on my own life.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2020, 05:41:00 PM
Best wishes, Poju!

Thanks!  0:)

Quote from: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 05:56:15 PM
I can certainly understand the feeling. I do hope things will be on the upswing. All the best to you and your loved ones, Poju.

Thanks!  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 07:29:58 PM

     NYC has 100 new cases in the last few hours. Earlier today they had 2 deaths, now it's 10.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 07:39:35 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 07:29:58 PM
     NYC has 100 new cases in the last few hours. Earlier today they had 2 deaths, now it's 10.

But what are the ages of the people who have died?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 08:18:34 PM

     
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 07:39:35 PM
But what are the ages of the people who have died?

     That's all I know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 08:19:45 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 17, 2020, 08:18:34 PM
     
     That's all I know.

Age is something that should be reported on as this is a part of the statistics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 11:00:16 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 17, 2020, 02:06:35 PM
Finland started to take political actions this week and it feels like we are at war against Corona. I'm nervous for my dad, 81 who is alone home avoiding all social contacts. I don't care about US politics right now. I have enough problems in my life. I feel my "quota" is full. I concentrate on my own well-being now. Sure, Finland is a well-functioning society with good infrastructure to deal with problems like this, but it's serious nevertheless. Just week ago my life was quite normal. Now I am planning my grocery store visits to minimaze interactions with other people... ...so I have no energy and interest to follow "latest polls" in primary states etc. stuff.

Fuck China for creating this mess!


I hope that you and your dad remains safe and well. I'm sure that Finland will deal,with this crisis as effectively as anywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Crudblud on March 18, 2020, 02:17:25 AM
Thanks to all who sent wishes for swift recovery earlier in the thread. My cough is not as bad today, but definitely still there. My temperature remains normal, my hands remain clean, though I must admit the paranoid new rate of handwashing is taking its toll on my eczema—now there's an underlying condition they didn't label "at risk"!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 18, 2020, 05:22:39 AM

     This is from May, 2018:

     Top White House official in charge of pandemic response exits abruptly (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/05/10/top-white-house-official-in-charge-of-pandemic-response-exits-abruptly/)

The top White House official responsible for leading the U.S. response in the event of a deadly pandemic has left the administration, and the global health security team he oversaw has been disbanded under a reorganization by national security adviser John Bolton.

The abrupt departure of Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer from the National Security Council means no senior administration official is now focused solely on global health security. Ziemer's departure, along with the breakup of his team, comes at a time when many experts say the country is already underprepared for the increasing risks of a pandemic or bioterrorism attack.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 18, 2020, 08:02:47 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 08:19:45 PM
Age is something that should be reported on as this is a part of the statistics.

Please God, I don't want to be a statistic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 18, 2020, 08:16:02 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 18, 2020, 05:22:39 AM
     This is from May, 2018:

     Top White House official in charge of pandemic response exits abruptly (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/05/10/top-white-house-official-in-charge-of-pandemic-response-exits-abruptly/)

The top White House official responsible for leading the U.S. response in the event of a deadly pandemic has left the administration, and the global health security team he oversaw has been disbanded under a reorganization by national security adviser John Bolton.

The abrupt departure of Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer from the National Security Council means no senior administration official is now focused solely on global health security. Ziemer's departure, along with the breakup of his team, comes at a time when many experts say the country is already underprepared for the increasing risks of a pandemic or bioterrorism attack.


   

This was reported and publicly revisited several days ago. Bolton dismissed it as raving by "the angry left".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 18, 2020, 08:53:39 AM
    Seth Rogen Gets High and Live Tweets 'Cats' So We Don't Have To (https://www.thedailybeast.com/seth-rogen-gets-high-and-live-tweets-cats-so-we-dont-have-to?source=articles&via=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29)

     Yeah, baby! (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

Quote from: T. D. on March 18, 2020, 08:16:02 AM
This was reported and publicly revisited several days ago. Bolton dismissed it as raving by "the angry left".

     Yes, there was an article by a Trump official claiming no such thing happened in a kind of nondenial denial way, just people being reassigned, consolidation, cost cutting, so on. That's a diversion posing as a refutation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 18, 2020, 09:37:52 AM
The one bit of reassuring news I see is the new infections in China has dropped dramatically, essentially to nil, and that the authorities are comfortable enough to remove the general lockdown that has been in effect. "Social distancing" is still practiced.

This suggests it is within the realm of possibility to contain this, albeit by implementing draconian measures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 18, 2020, 09:49:06 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 18, 2020, 09:37:52 AM
The one bit of reassuring news I see is the new infections in China has dropped dramatically, essentially to nil, and that the authorities are comfortable enough to remove the general lockdown that has been in effect. "Social distancing" is still practiced.

This suggests it is within the realm of possibility to contain this, albeit by implementing draconian measures.


And the Chinese people have, in a sense, the advantage of us, as they have more experience of draconian measures. Something which, no, I do not envy them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 11:11:14 AM
All UK schools closing on Friday but provision is being made for vulnerable children and the children of health workers to stay on. I'm going to have to deliver my lessons by remote access which I'm not looking forward to. I still think that the government, which I do not generally support, were right to keep the schools open as long as possible and I'm glad that there is increasing awareness of the plight of children from abusive homes. Schools may still provide meals for vulnerable children. All public examinations are cancelled. I told my young History class today to be aware, as historians, of the significance of the historical time, worrying though it is, that they are living through.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51952314
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 18, 2020, 11:15:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 18, 2020, 09:49:06 AM
And the Chinese people have, in a sense, the advantage of us, as they have more experience of draconian measures. Something which, no, I do not envy them.

:laugh: :laugh: :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 18, 2020, 11:19:08 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 17, 2020, 08:19:45 PM
Age is something that should be reported on as this is a part of the statistics.

Why?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 11:19:48 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 11:11:14 AM
All UK schools closing on Friday but provision is being made for vulnerable children and the children of health workers to stay on. I'm going to have to deliver my lessons by remote access which I'm not looking forward to. I still think that the government, which I do not generally support, were right to keep the schools open as long as possible and I'm glad that there is increasing awareness of the plight of children from abusive homes. Schools may still provide meals for vulnerable children. All public examinations are cancelled. I told my young History class today to be aware, as historians, of the significance of the historical time, worrying though it is, that they are living through.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51952314

Who will look after the kids being provided for?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 18, 2020, 01:58:20 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/virus-pandemic-exercise-got-one-thing-wrong-the-u-s-response (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/virus-pandemic-exercise-got-one-thing-wrong-the-u-s-response)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 01:59:07 PM
There may be an obvious answer to this and if so, I'm sorry. Can someone explain to me why the number of cases peaks? I mean, why is the graph a sombrero?  Why doesn't it go on until heard immunity is reached?

Is it because of its expected behaviour in Summer weather? Or is it just because of social distancing? Or because of heard immunity? Or what?

And why will there be subsequent cycles?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 02:04:03 PM
Another question. Why will closing schools slow the spread of the virus? I just don't understand, I think I must be missing something obvious. Is it to do with protecting teachers?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 18, 2020, 02:36:11 PM
Italy in particular is suffering. The latest figures of deaths is shocking in the extreme.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 18, 2020, 02:42:12 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 02:04:03 PM
Another question. Why will closing schools slow the spread of the virus? I just don't understand, I think I must be missing something obvious. Is it to do with protecting teachers?

I believe children are super-spreaders of the virus although they are not ill themselves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 02:45:02 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 11:19:48 AM
Who will look after the kids being provided for?

Maybe in the maintained sector the Local Authority will provide food vouchers etc for children who, through poverty, were entitled to free school meals in term-time.

On a separate note I'm suspicious that the government will abuse the emergency powers which they are about to initiate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 18, 2020, 03:00:20 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 11:11:14 AM
All UK schools closing on Friday but provision is being made for vulnerable children and the children of health workers to stay on. I'm going to have to deliver my lessons by remote access which I'm not looking forward to. I still think that the government, which I do not generally support, were right to keep the schools open as long as possible and I'm glad that there is increasing awareness of the plight of children from abusive homes. Schools may still provide meals for vulnerable children. All public examinations are cancelled. I told my young History class today to be aware, as historians, of the significance of the historical time, worrying though it is, that they are living through.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51952314
Scary and confusing times, I know.  I suspect that you've probably already done a bit of thinking on how you might (if needed) conduct online classes....and perhaps have had a talk with your feline?

On the news lately, images and today some interviews with college kids partying on the beaches of Florida, etc.  It's sinking in to a few of them, but me thinks too little too late!   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 03:03:20 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 18, 2020, 03:00:20 PM
Scary and confusing times, I know.  I suspect that you've probably already done a bit of thinking on how you might (if needed) conduct online classes....and perhaps have had a talk with your feline?

On the news lately, images and today some interviews with college kids partying on the beaches of Florida, etc.  It's sinking in to a few of them, but me thinks too little too late!   :(

I expect that our cat Oliver will play a starring role during the online lessons as he enjoys walking all over the computer keyboard or lying down on it whenever I need to use it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 18, 2020, 03:17:32 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 03:03:20 PM
I expect that our cat Oliver will play a starring role during the online lessons as he enjoys walking all over the computer keyboard or lying down on it whenever I need to use it!
So, no banishment (during classes) then?  Perhaps he could help to provide some needed levity/tension-relief?  After all, laughter is the best medicine.   ;)

Good luck and let us know how it goes.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 18, 2020, 04:01:31 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 01:59:07 PM
There may be an obvious answer to this and if so, I'm sorry. Can someone explain to me why the number of cases peaks? I mean, why is the graph a sombrero?  Why doesn't it go on until heard immunity is reached?

It will, but the number of immune people becomes larger as they have had the infection, and at some point this will result in slower spreading of the virus, and the fewer new cases will appear. Therefore the number of infected people will decrease with time. But if an efficient vaccine isn't found, we will all get the infection eventually.

Quote from: Mandryka
Is it because of its expected behaviour in Summer weather? Or is it just because of social distancing? Or because of heard immunity? Or what?

And why will there be subsequent cycles?

The belief is, that the virus will spread much slower in the summer, first and foremost due to more ultraviolet radiation from the sun, but this will stop again in the winter. It is the same with epidemics of influenza.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 18, 2020, 04:02:45 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 18, 2020, 02:36:11 PM
Italy in particular is suffering. The latest figures of deaths is shocking in the extreme.

Horrible!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 18, 2020, 04:04:30 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 02:04:03 PM
Another question. Why will closing schools slow the spread of the virus? I just don't understand, I think I must be missing something obvious. Is it to do with protecting teachers?

Children may spread the disease mutually without having many or any symptoms at all, and then they have contact with their parents and grand parents, which may contract the disease from the children.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 18, 2020, 04:10:27 PM
I'm not sure if this has been posted, but it's a fascinating article - with « living graph » simulations. It explains how a spreading virus reacts to containment measures such as quarantine, social distancing.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 18, 2020, 05:01:33 PM
Quote from: André on March 18, 2020, 04:10:27 PM
I'm not sure if this has been posted, but it's a fascinating article - with « living graph » simulations. It explains how a spreading virus reacts to containment measures such as quarantine, social distancing.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/)

As opposed to:

A Boston doctor and five friends went to Miami. All six came back sick, at least four with the coronavirus. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/19/nation/boston-doctor-five-friends-went-miami-all-six-came-back-sick-least-four-with-coronavirus/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 18, 2020, 05:09:06 PM
Quote from: André on March 18, 2020, 04:10:27 PM
I'm not sure if this has been posted, but it's a fascinating article - with « living graph » simulations. It explains how a spreading virus reacts to containment measures such as quarantine, social distancing.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/)
You beat me by just a few minutes. It's very helpful in explaining the basis behind it...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 18, 2020, 06:42:29 PM

     Testing has ramped up in NYC so the numbered of confirmed cases is over 1,871 from 813 yesterday. I expect we'll see similar jumps in hot spots around the country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 18, 2020, 09:26:27 PM
Probably mentioned already, but looks like China and South Korea have already flattened the curve.


https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/china/


In the US the curve is going upward still, so probably the same pattern will exist for every country to where their curves will flatten later.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 09:59:09 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 18, 2020, 02:42:12 PM
I believe children are super-spreaders of the virus although they are not ill themselves.

But they've already spread it to the adults they have contact with, parents and teachers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 10:02:27 PM
Quote from: greg on March 18, 2020, 09:26:27 PM
Probably mentioned already, but looks like China and South Korea have already flattened the curve.


https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/china/


In the US the curve is going upward still, so probably the same pattern will exist for every country to where their curves will flatten later.

They've flattened the curve by isolating people, presumably if they let social contacts return to normal, the curve will take off again. There isn't as yet critical levels of immunity in the population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 10:43:26 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 18, 2020, 03:17:32 PM
So, no banishment (during classes) then?  Perhaps he could help to provide some needed levity/tension-relief?  After all, laughter is the best medicine.   ;)

Good luck and let us know how it goes.

PD

Thank you PD.
Although as a technophobe I'm not looking forward to it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 18, 2020, 11:11:09 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 10:43:26 PM
Thank you PD.
Although as a technophobe I'm not looking forward to it.

I'm assuming that your school has a Learning Management System (LMS) and this is how they will remotely deliver the program. Our LMS is set up at the beginning of the school year with the whole program already there. It means that staff, students and parents can access it. It includes lessons, assessment, communications and the ability to submit work electronically.

I've been asked to set up work for the students in a specific year level on a week by week basis, just in case the Government decides we should close. All I had to do was create a small vodcast showing students what they had to do by pointing to the parts of the system where they could get the already set up programs.

If your school doesn't have an LMS then yes, you might easily have a tech nightmare.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on March 19, 2020, 12:01:39 AM
Our LMS is Blackboard, and although aspects of it are wonky as hell, I will never go back to the old way of doing things. For one thing, I put all my exams online, so exam day is holiday for me. The old me used to deal with stupid scantrons and paper exams. I see the old dinosaurs still using these methods and i can see why--it is often so much easier to go on doing the familiar thing rather than climbing the steep learning curve, even though it will save you vast time and trouble later on.

A couple of years ago I taught my first online class (Bio for nonmajors), and last semester, I got stuck with the in-person version, so I flipped it and used the video lectures I recorded before. It was a great success; I received the best student evals ever. Also it is much, much easier and more enjoyable for me!

Now, I am teaching core curriculum and upper division (I have a fkn Ph.D. for chrissakes), and I am recording video lectures for these as well out of necessity! We were ordered to transition to fully online last week. Fortunately, our institution is pretty good to faculty and they told us not to kill ourselves trying to teach everything we normally would--"We are in triage" said one dean. It is time-consuming--Every 20 minute lecture takes about 1.5 hours from recording, editing, exporting as MP4, uploading to YouTube, etc.

The way I see it, every thing you learn and do in the realm of online education will save you time and energy (and commuting!!) later on...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on March 19, 2020, 12:10:50 AM
A ballad for the end of time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvQyvrnBcgI
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 19, 2020, 12:59:05 AM
A Dutch newspaper reported that Italian virologist (Roberto Burioni) reacted very critical to the Dutch 'group immunity' thinking. "It is a very big risk that the Dutch government is taking. We do not yet know whether immunity to this virus can occur. That's still unknown. In addition, there is no vaccine yet."

Despite that, the Dutch National Institute for Public Health has not changed its mind about it.

Interesting, to say the least. 

(Also for the UK, because, iirc, they decided to do more or less the same as the Dutch.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 19, 2020, 12:59:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 09:59:09 PM
But they've already spread it to the adults they have contact with, parents and teachers.

True, and grandparents who will look after them while their parents (hopefully) at work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 19, 2020, 01:19:06 AM
Clutching at straws, but a report in newspaper this morning that treatment for malaria may have some affect.

"Despite the grim figures, some scientists are optimistic. An eminent French doctor from Insitut Hospitalo-Universitaire in Marseilles claimed a drug used for malaria could stop the virus being contagious in just six days.
Professor Didier Raoult said a group of 24 patients who were given chloroquine experienced a rapid speeding up of their healing process as wellas the time they remained contagious.
Professor Robin May, an expert in infectious disease at Birmingham University said "Since it has a long history of clinical use, the safety profile of chloroquine is well established and is cheap and relatively easy to manufacture".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2020, 01:20:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 18, 2020, 10:02:27 PM
They've flattened the curve by isolating people, presumably if they let social contacts return to normal, the curve will take off again. There isn't as yet critical levels of immunity in the population.

Yes, and that's why these measures will be necessary for several months and maybe again next winter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2020, 01:25:24 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 18, 2020, 02:42:12 PM
I believe children are super-spreaders of the virus although they are not ill themselves.

Well, they are in a way ill, so far that they have got the infection, but it runs a mild and perhaps completely asymptomatic course,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spineur on March 19, 2020, 01:59:36 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 19, 2020, 01:19:06 AM
Clutching at straws, but a report in newspaper this morning that treatment for malaria may have some affect.

"Despite the grim figures, some scientists are optimistic. An eminent French doctor from Insitut Hospitalo-Universitaire in Marseilles claimed a drug used for malaria could stop the virus being contagious in just six days.
Professor Didier Raoult said a group of 24 patients who were given chloroquine experienced a rapid speeding up of their healing process as wellas the time they remained contagious.
Professor Robin May, an expert in infectious disease at Birmingham University said "Since it has a long history of clinical use, the safety profile of chloroquine is well established and is cheap and relatively easy to manufacture".


At first, this treatment using hydrochloroquine was met with some scepticism by experts, as they could not see how this molecule could affect any virus.  Indeed it does not act directly on it, but it opens a channel for Zn^2+ ions to get into the cell.  The Zn^2+ then blocks the replication of the virus. This is why this treatment requires a second drug for the Zn^2+ release.  This is all explained in this video

https://www.youtube.com/v/U7F1cnWup9M

South Corea used paquenil (Sanofi trademark for hydrochlorine), one of the reason why their deathrate is lower.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on March 19, 2020, 02:03:45 AM
Raoult is definitely someone worth taking seriously, certainly no crackpot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 19, 2020, 02:35:38 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 19, 2020, 01:20:57 AM
Yes, and that's why these measures will be necessary for several months and maybe again next winter.

The positive thing, as far as I can see, is that the complications which cause death are mostly handleable with the right equipment. Of course, some people die with intensive care, but I'm sure I've read that most get through, even those with preexisting conditions. The immediate problem is that there aren't  enough respirators and other, more advanced, apparatus, not enough intensive care beds.

What I'm leading to is this. Vaccine or no, heard immunity or no, by next winter, there must be a way of manufacturing enough of the required pieces of equipment. When the second wave lets rip, it should be far less fatal, our reaction should be far less chaotic.

Take care, Poul, there's still a load of music to be explored! We need you here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2020, 04:39:38 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 19, 2020, 02:35:38 AM
The positive thing, as far as I can see, is that the complications which cause death are mostly handleable with the right equipment. Of course, some people die with intensive care, but I'm sure I've read that most get through, even those with preexisting conditions. The immediate problem is that there aren't  enough respirators and other, more advanced, apparatus, not enough intensive care beds.

What I'm leading to is this. Vaccine or no, heard immunity or no, by next winter, there must be a way of manufacturing enough of the required pieces of equipment. When the second wave lets rip, it should be far less fatal, our reaction should be far less chaotic.

Take care, Poul, there's still a load of music to be explored! We need you here.

Thanks for your kind and encouraging words Howard. I am very cautious at the moment, and don't go out other than for shopping food - and always keeping distance. The only person with whom I am in close contact is my wife. I do not even see my two sons now.

Hopefully you also take care and avoid any unnecessary contact with other people. You are also needed here.

Only the future will show how long this situation is going to continue, but it provides ample opportunity to listen to lots of music and read the books that have been waiting to be read since long.  :)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 04:59:02 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 18, 2020, 10:43:26 PM
Thank you PD.
Although as a technophobe I'm not looking forward to it.
What kind of technical support do you have from your school in terms of training?  And/or perhaps some of the gents on hear who have done it in the past might be able to help you?

You can do it Jeffrey!  We have faith in you!   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 06:03:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 18, 2020, 03:17:32 PM
So, no banishment (during classes) then?  Perhaps he could help to provide some needed levity/tension-relief?  After all, laughter is the best medicine.   ;)

Good luck and let us know how it goes.

PD


As you may or may not know, we Irish have a somewhat peculiar sense of humour. We use it to lighten our load in times of crises.

With great respect to my UK friends and neighbours, one joke going around here at the moment goes like this:

there are five people on an endangered aeroplane with only four parachutes. Those people are Trump, the Pope, Boris Johnson, Leo Varadkar [Irish Prime Minister] and a 9 year old boy. Trump grabs the first parachute saying I am too important, I need to save America and then jumps. The Pope declares that he is needed to save the Catholic Church, grabs another one and jumps. Boris declares that he is also very much needed, is the most intelligent man in the UK, grabs another one and jumps. Leo turns to the young boy and says I am a lot older than you, I have lived a good life so you take the last one. The young boy answers that it is OK, there are still two parachutes left as the most intelligent man in the UK has just grabbed my schoolbag.

You see, we Irish are no respecters of authority or reputation.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2020, 06:04:45 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 19, 2020, 04:39:38 AM
Thanks for your kind and encouraging words Howard. I am very cautious at the moment, and don't go out other than for shopping food - and always keeping distance. The only person with whom I am in close contact is my wife. I do not even see my two sons now.

Warm thoughts!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 19, 2020, 06:13:26 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/finSEaS.jpg)

Via FT (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 06:28:22 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 06:03:26 AM

As you may or may not know, we Irish have a somewhat peculiar sense of humour. We use it to lighten our load in times of crises.

With great respect to my UK friends and neighbours, one joke going around here at the moment goes like this:

there are five people on an endangered aeroplane with only four parachutes. Those people are Trump, the Pope, Boris Johnson, Leo Varadkar [Irish Prime Minister] and a 9 year old boy. Trump grabs the first parachute saying I am too important, I need to save America and then jumps. The Pope declares that he is needed to save the Catholic Church, grabs another one and jumps. Boris declares that he is also very much needed, is the most intelligent man in the UK, grabs another one and jumps. Leo turns to the young boy and says I am a lot older than you, I have lived a good life so you take the last one. The young boy answers that it is OK, there are still two parachutes left as the most intelligent man in the UK has just grabbed my schoolbag.

You see, we Irish are no respecters of authority or reputation.  ;D
Thank you for making me laugh!   ;) :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 06:31:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 06:28:22 AM
Thank you for making me laugh!   ;) :)

We can be respectfully disrespectful  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2020, 06:33:22 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2020, 06:04:45 AM
Warm thoughts!

Warm thoughts to you too, Karl!

Be careful and cautious these days,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 07:26:12 AM

     Scumbag Sec. Pompeo is intensifying sanctions on Iran as the death toll mounts. Putting ethics on the back burner for a minute, how is this smart? Now put it on the front burner (I'll allow that). Why should we race the mullahs to be the most evil?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 19, 2020, 07:58:22 AM
So yeah... this might be why it's so bad in Italy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNMdg4morQs

This channel is sponsored by the Chinese government. If that guy had a virus then seems to be a deliberate attempt of murdering Europeans by using their own political correctness against them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2020, 08:07:14 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 06:03:26 AM

As you may or may not know, we Irish have a somewhat peculiar sense of humour. We use it to lighten our load in times of crises.

With great respect to my UK friends and neighbours, one joke going around here at the moment goes like this:

there are five people on an endangered aeroplane with only four parachutes. Those people are Trump, the Pope, Boris Johnson, Leo Varadkar [Irish Prime Minister] and a 9 year old boy. Trump grabs the first parachute saying I am too important, I need to save America and then jumps. The Pope declares that he is needed to save the Catholic Church, grabs another one and jumps. Boris declares that he is also very much needed, is the most intelligent man in the UK, grabs another one and jumps. Leo turns to the young boy and says I am a lot older than you, I have lived a good life so you take the last one. The young boy answers that it is OK, there are still two parachutes left as the most intelligent man in the UK has just grabbed my schoolbag.

You see, we Irish are no respecters of authority or reputation.  ;D


A nice variant on a joke I've been told before; thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 08:53:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2020, 08:07:14 AM
A nice variant on a joke I've been told before; thanks!

A Universal Truth   ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 19, 2020, 09:14:01 AM
Quote from: greg on March 19, 2020, 07:58:22 AM
So yeah... this might be why it's so bad in Italy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNMdg4morQs

This channel is sponsored by the Chinese government. If that guy had a virus then seems to be a deliberate attempt of murdering Europeans by using their own political correctness against them.

People are legitimately anxious about this pandemic, but for you it's just an opportunity for some childish race-baiting?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 19, 2020, 09:28:47 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 17, 2020, 11:00:16 PM
I hope that you and your dad remains safe and well. I'm sure that Finland will deal,with this crisis as effectively as anywhere.

Thanks! I understand UK is taking more serious actions with this. Be safe yourself!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 19, 2020, 09:41:40 AM
Quote from: Daverz on March 19, 2020, 09:14:01 AM
People are legitimately anxious about this pandemic, but for you it's just an opportunity for some childish race-baiting?
What?  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2020, 10:45:44 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 08:53:14 AM
A Universal Truth   ;D

Verily, verily.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 10:58:24 AM
     I'm following the French lockdown, and the word is that it's likely to be extended beyond 15 days or whatever it is now, initially by another 15 days. Our Paris hotel is shuttered and our contact Laure sent a form letter that casts doubt that it will reopen soon.

We regret to inform you that Chouette Hotel is closed for an indefinite period.

We can respond to your requests as soon as the establishment reopens.

We ask you, Madam, Sir, to accept our apologies for this situation.


     I don't think a trip in May is going to happen.

     OK, off to Air France........

     US and French travel restrictions permitting, I have months of rescheduling room at no additional cost.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 11:07:34 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 10:58:24 AM
     I'm following the French lockdown, and the word is that it's likely to be extended beyond 15 days or whatever it is now, initially by another 15 days. Our Paris hotel is shuttered and our contact Laure sent a form letter that casts doubt that it will reopen soon.

We regret to inform you that Chouette Hotel is closed for an indefinite period.

We can respond to your requests as soon as the establishment reopens.

We ask you, Madam, Sir, to accept our apologies for this situation.


     I don't think a trip in May is going to happen.

      OK, off to Air France........
Sorry to hear about your trip; perhaps things will be radically better by then?  Alas, if you're concerned about getting your deposits/refunds back..... :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 11:23:34 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 11:07:34 AM
Sorry to hear about your trip; perhaps things will be radically better by then?  Alas, if you're concerned about getting your deposits/refunds back..... :(

     No, I don't want money back, I'm interested in how/when the trip will take place.

     (https://www.parisdise.com/taste/dine_paris/6e/fouet1.jpg)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 11:26:59 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 11:23:34 AM
     No, I don't want money back, I'm interested in how/when the trip will take place.

     (https://www.parisdise.com/taste/dine_paris/6e/fouet1.jpg)

   
Can you change your reservations without incurring lots of big penalties?  Like for the plane tickets?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 11:47:13 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 19, 2020, 06:03:26 AM

As you may or may not know, we Irish have a somewhat peculiar sense of humour. We use it to lighten our load in times of crises.

With great respect to my UK friends and neighbours, one joke going around here at the moment goes like this:

there are five people on an endangered aeroplane with only four parachutes. Those people are Trump, the Pope, Boris Johnson, Leo Varadkar [Irish Prime Minister] and a 9 year old boy. Trump grabs the first parachute saying I am too important, I need to save America and then jumps. The Pope declares that he is needed to save the Catholic Church, grabs another one and jumps. Boris declares that he is also very much needed, is the most intelligent man in the UK, grabs another one and jumps. Leo turns to the young boy and says I am a lot older than you, I have lived a good life so you take the last one. The young boy answers that it is OK, there are still two parachutes left as the most intelligent man in the UK has just grabbed my schoolbag.

You see, we Irish are no respecters of authority or reputation.  ;D
Haha. That's very funny Fergus and made me smile.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 11:50:03 AM


Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 11:26:59 AM
Can you change your reservations without incurring lots of big penalties?  Like for the plane tickets?

     (https://i.ytimg.com/vi/t7RuLYs_CYw/maxresdefault.jpg)

     Did you not hear me? We can't give out no information.

     Yes, I can reschedule with no penalty.

   

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 12:00:48 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 04:59:02 AM
What kind of technical support do you have from your school in terms of training?  And/or perhaps some of the gents on hear who have done it in the past might be able to help you?

You can do it Jeffrey!  We have faith in you!   :)

PD
Thank you PD for your inspiriting and kind words. And thanks to others for comments.
Frankly I regard the whole 'online, virtual-reality lesson' as a total nightmare. It has caused me more stress than the Coronavirus. Like many others, I suspect, I hardly slept last night. Having said that there is a very supportive IT team in the school and they have told me that when I deliver my first online lesson next week I can do it from the school with their support which is very reassuring. I went for two days in a row to the training session after school. What usually happens is that I cannot get into the laptop in the first place and by the time that it finally lets me in the lesson moves on to a place where I no longer understanding anything that is going on and just stare blankly at the screen. For the younger staff, of course, the whole thing is a walk in the park. Anyway, we shall see and thanks for the support and advice which is much appreciated.

To add to all this it it my daughter's birthday on Monday and we have invited her (we live in a quiet village) here to celebrate. However, she insists that we go up to London. She lives in West Dulwich which is one of the worst areas for Coronavirus infection. I explaned to her that this was like being invited for a birthday celebration in one of the main plague villages during the period of The Black Death. This at least amused some of my colleagues at work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 19, 2020, 12:04:16 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 12:00:48 PM
Thank you PD for your inspiriting and kind words. And thanks to others for comments.
Frankly I regard the whole 'online, virtual-reality lesson' as a total nightmare. It has caused me more stress than the Cronavirus. Like many others, I suspect, I hardly slept last night. Having said that there is a very supportive IT team in the school and they have told me that when I deliver my first online lesson next week I can do it from the school with their support which is very reassuring. I went for two days in a row to the training session after school. What usually happens is that I cannot get into the laptop in the first place and by the time that it finally lets me in the lesson moves on to a place where I no longer understanding anything that is going on and just stare blankly at the screen. For the younger staff, of course, the whole thing is a walk in the park. Anyway, we shall see and thanks for the support and advice which is much appreciated.

To add to all this it it my daughter's birthday on Monday and we have invited her (we live in a quiet village) to celebrate. However, she insists that we go up to London. She lives in West Dulwich which is one of the worst areas for Coronavirus infection. I explaned to her that this was like being invited for a birthday celebration in one of the main plague villages during the period of The Black Death. This at least amused some of my colleagues at work.

Then you definitely need that cat around to keep the students occupied.

Stay healthy and happy birthday to your daughter!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 12:05:39 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 19, 2020, 12:04:16 PM
Then you definitely need that cat around to keep the students occupied.

Stay healthy and happy birthday to your daughter!

Oh, thanks so much Jeffrey!
Much appreciated  :) :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 12:37:42 PM
     

     (https://i.imgur.com/y5AX21N.png)

     We've passed the 2,000 new cases a day point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:43:15 PM
From Romania with love, to all GMGers!

Stay safe, obey all rules and restrictions imposed, keep strict hygienic rules and be optimistic! I wish you and all your loved ones and fellow countrymen all best of luck and very good health in these hard times!

As for myself, I'll isolate myself as much as I can together with my 79yo father which I can't leave because he can't move out from his bed and one of my maternal aunts 83yo who lives next door to us. My wife, 7yo son and my inlaws are isolated in a county 2 hours drive away fron Bucharest where no case has been reported as of yet.  As of yet the disease spreads in Romania at a moderate pace and I hope the trend will not going to
explode. The measures taken by the government proves quite effective, the irresponsibility of some people notwithstanding.

I'm sure that we all will get over this bloody crisis! May God and our own civic sense and respobsibility proect us alll!






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2020, 12:46:23 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:43:15 PM
From Romania with love, to all GMGers!

Stay safe, obey all rules and restrictions imposed, keep strict hygienic rules and be optimistic! I wish you and all your loved ones and fellow countrymen all best of luck and very good health in these hard times!

As for myself, I'll isolate myself as much as I can together with my 79yo father which I can't leave because he can't move out from his bed and one of my maternal aunts 83yo who lives next door to us. My wife, 7yo son and my inlaws are isolated in a county 2 hours drive away fron Bucharest where no case has been reported as of yet.  As of yet the disease spreads in Romania at a moderate pace and I hope the trend will not going to
explode. The measures taken by the government proves quite effective, the irresponsibility of some people notwithstanding.

I'm sure that we all will get over this bloody crisis! May God and our own civic sense and respobsibility proect us alll!








God bless you & yours, brother!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:53:56 PM
And as someone said above, now is the right time to read those books and listen to those musics it was high time to read and listen to! And more important, to spend more time with our children and parents!  As St. John Apostle said, Love each other and it'll suffice!

I love you all, guys!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 19, 2020, 12:59:25 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:53:56 PM
And as someone said above, now is the right time to read those books and listen to those musics it was high time to read and listen to!
Helllll yes.  8)
Turn this into a opportunity.  0:)

Though I do feel bad for the extroverts out there who don't many hobbies at home. Good luck, I guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 01:14:58 PM
Also an opportunity for all of us to think about and ponder our own unavoidable mortality and order our priorities in this short life we're alloted.

Carpe diem!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 02:13:07 PM

     
Quote from: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 01:14:58 PM
Also an opportunity for all of us to think about and ponder our own unavoidable mortality and order our priorities in this short life we're alloted.

Carpe diem!

     I'll probably order chicken kee mow with unavoidable sauce.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2020, 02:15:03 PM
Even when I enjoy them, the sauces I order are always avoidable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 02:26:54 PM

     We have a very nice delivery option in Watertown, a little Thai place that was all takeout and delivery, then added a few tables, and now is back to the original format until the all clear sounds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 19, 2020, 03:06:00 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2020, 12:46:23 PM
God bless you & yours, brother!

Amen!
Quote from: greg on March 19, 2020, 12:59:25 PM
Helllll yes.  8)
Turn this into a opportunity.  0:)

Though I do feel bad for the extroverts out there who don't many hobbies at home. Good luck, I guess.

And prayers and sympathy. I am an extreme introvert, but even for me the growing self isolation is draining. Possibly it's the knowledge of why all this is going on that is depressing.

But people still can go out for a walk, and wave and say hello to each other even if they are strangers and even if it's from six feet away.  And I noticed as I took a walk this evening, that's what all of us seem to be doing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 19, 2020, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 12:00:48 PM
Thank you PD for your inspiriting and kind words. And thanks to others for comments.
Frankly I regard the whole 'online, virtual-reality lesson' as a total nightmare. It has caused me more stress than the Coronavirus. Like many others, I suspect, I hardly slept last night. Having said that there is a very supportive IT team in the school and they have told me that when I deliver my first online lesson next week I can do it from the school with their support which is very reassuring. I went for two days in a row to the training session after school. What usually happens is that I cannot get into the laptop in the first place and by the time that it finally lets me in the lesson moves on to a place where I no longer understanding anything that is going on and just stare blankly at the screen. For the younger staff, of course, the whole thing is a walk in the park. Anyway, we shall see and thanks for the support and advice which is much appreciated.

To add to all this it it my daughter's birthday on Monday and we have invited her (we live in a quiet village) here to celebrate. However, she insists that we go up to London. She lives in West Dulwich which is one of the worst areas for Coronavirus infection. I explaned to her that this was like being invited for a birthday celebration in one of the main plague villages during the period of The Black Death. This at least amused some of my colleagues at work.
Oh, boy!  Wonder why that is?  I wouldn't think that there would be that many people trying to access how to host a teaching session?  Or is it a combo of how to host and how also to access the lesson causing the issue...maybe all the students trying to access it too?  If so, I would think that they should have a for teachers' only vs. a student access.  Though perhaps it's just a case of too much activity overall on the school's network?  Good to hear that someone will be with you for your first lesson at least.  Sorry that this has turned into such a complicated mess though.   :(  I know, computers and technology can be frustrating; I hate to think how many hours (days?) I've spent working with someone over the phone trying to either fix things or learn more about the technology so that I know what I'm doing!  It can be rewording though to learn something new...perhaps try and think of it that way when you succeed (and you will).   :)

And, yes, a very happy birthday to your daughter....must admit that I'm rather surprised where she wanted the family to go!  Has she been taking any preventative measures (like trying her best to do 'social distancing', etc.)?

Best wishes and stay as safe as you can,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 19, 2020, 06:31:23 PM
I find the whole coronavirus very frustrating, mostly because the communication about it has been so poor (unclear, contradictory, etc.). I finally found an article that explains it quite clearly: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/coronavirus-will-radically-alter-the-u-s/ar-BB11pF6k?ocid=msedgntp

We're told that this will last through July/August - but that is only if we have a worst case scenario and everyone gets sick now! The whole timing of it is being misunderstood. If we need to shelter in place for 3-6 months, we are still looking at another major wave in the fall.

This graph shows it with a timeline (the first I've found with a concrete timeline):
(https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB11pzQu.img?h=1080&w=1920&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f)

SO if they could have a vaccine become live later this year, we could avoid the worst (if the measures they are trying to enforce work). Why isn't every country of the world getting together and pooling resources to get this done asap? We need to be funding research (if that is necessary), making the approvals process as streamlined as possible, getting the trials done in the shortest amount of time possible, getting the production ramped up so that mass quantities can be given round the world as quickly as possible, etc. I know there is one company that just started a trial, and if we are lucky, that will work just as needed. But there is no guarantee. And even if it is 'the one', production will be strained to keep up with worldwide demand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 19, 2020, 06:54:23 PM
And it looks like we knew how badly we were prepared prior to this outbreak:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/virus-outbreak-cascade-warnings-went-193648556.html

Quote"The outbreak of the respiratory virus began in China and was quickly spread around the world by air travelers, who ran high fevers. In the United States, it was first detected in Chicago, and 47 days later the World Health Organization declared a pandemic. By then it was too late: 110 million Americans were expected to become ill, leading to 7.7 million hospitalized and 586,000 dead.

That scenario, code-named "Crimson Contagion," was simulated by the Trump administration's Department of Health and Human Services in a series of exercises that ran from last January to August.

The simulation's sobering results — contained in a draft report dated October 2019 that has not previously been reported — drove home just how underfunded, underprepared and uncoordinated the federal government would be for a life-or-death battle with a virus for which no treatment existed."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 19, 2020, 07:50:56 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.
Whoa. I feel for YOU! I can only say that I hope you (and your family) stay safe and healthy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Symphonic Addict on March 19, 2020, 08:22:28 PM
My only contribution to this thread is this: my opinion about this virus is that it was intentionally created and spread. I don't believe that it came from an animal origin by mutation. The real rulers have the worst intentions towards people, and I'm not mentioning presidents or kings. I suppose you can guess who they are.


I really hope all of you stay safe in your respective countries. I wish you all the best including your families.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 19, 2020, 09:38:34 PM
Quote from: Symphonic Addict on March 19, 2020, 08:22:28 PM
My only contribution to this thread is this: my opinion about this virus is that it was intentionally created and spread. I don't believe that it came from an animal origin by mutation. The real rulers have the worst intentions towards people, and I'm not mentioning presidents or kings. I suppose you can guess who they are.


I really hope all of you stay safe in your respective countries. I wish you all the best including your families.

I can't guess who you're talking about. Or what you might be basing this opinion on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 20, 2020, 12:08:45 AM
I had an interesting discussion with my wife concerning the virus.

For over forty years she worked for the United States Government as an IT specialist.  She spent twenty-five years with the Department of the Army and the last fifteen years working for the Department of Justice.  As a senior manager of the Department of Justice she worked on and signed off on plans on how to deal with the outbreak of a virus like Corona.  She knows of plans that were developed by the Department of Defense decades ago in order to deal with such a crisis.  As far as she is concerned any claims by the current administration that we were caught by surprise are completely bogus.  The Trump Administration was more concerned about tax breaks for the wealthy than preparing for a potential pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 20, 2020, 12:48:15 AM
Quote from: Symphonic Addict on March 19, 2020, 08:22:28 PM
My only contribution to this thread is this: my opinion about this virus is that it was intentionally created and spread. I don't believe that it came from an animal origin by mutation. The real rulers have the worst intentions towards people, and I'm not mentioning presidents or kings. I suppose you can guess who they are.
.

If you are serious, I suggest that you change your username to

"fake news addict".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 12:57:14 AM
Josie Golding, PhD, epidemics lead at UK-based Wellcome Trust, said the findings by Andersen and his colleagues are "crucially important to bring an evidence-based view to the rumors that have been circulating about the origins of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) causing COVID-19."

"They conclude that the virus is the product of natural evolution," Goulding adds, "ending any speculation about deliberate genetic engineering."

read more at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/03/200317175442.htm
or
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 20, 2020, 01:06:17 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 19, 2020, 10:58:24 AM
     I'm following the French lockdown, and the word is that it's likely to be extended beyond 15 days or whatever it is now, initially by another 15 days. Our Paris hotel is shuttered and our contact Laure sent a form letter that casts doubt that it will reopen soon.

We regret to inform you that Chouette Hotel is closed for an indefinite period.

We can respond to your requests as soon as the establishment reopens.

We ask you, Madam, Sir, to accept our apologies for this situation.


     I don't think a trip in May is going to happen.

     OK, off to Air France........

     US and French travel restrictions permitting, I have months of rescheduling room at no additional cost.

My son works for a large company in the travel industry. He had someone on the phone yesterday demanding immediate refund of deposit paid for expensive holiday. It was explained to the client that the company were working through £millions worth of deposits which takes time and eventually his money will be returned. With this my son received a blast  - My business has gone. Today, I sacked a dozen employees and I am ruined - I want my (deleted) money NOW!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 01:39:13 AM
We won't be able here at GMG to solve all the problems and questions surrounding Covid!
This article explains a few (China related) issues (well, for me, at least) :

"And that's where China really does have issues. The country's food safety standards are notoriously bad, despite numerous government-led initiatives to improve them. Food scandals are common, and diarrhea and food poisoning are a distressingly regular experience. Markets, like Huanan, that aren't licensed for live species nevertheless sell them. Workers are undertrained in basic hygiene techniques like glove-wearing and hand-washing. Dangerous additives are commonly used to increase production.

China's conditions are not unique. It looks, in fact, a lot like the United States did in the past, before muckraking exposés led to the creation of modern regulation systems. Even today, the United States can lag behind best practices on such issues as antibiotics in feed, cattle slaughter, or poultry washing. And, as with the American public of the 1900s, the Chinese citizenry badly wants change. Seventy-seven percent of the public ranks food safety as their single biggest concern.

As with so much else in China, politics gets in the way of sensible policy. Exposés of the kind that drove reform in the United States have a hard time finding traction in China's censorious media environment, where the interests of billion-dollar corporations and their party backers often override those of the public. When the author Zhou Qing wrote a groundbreaking exposé, What Kind of God, on the Chinese food industry in 2006, two-thirds of the book was removed before publication and its success eventually forced him into political exile.

Part of China's problem can be attributed to the power of traditional Chinese medicine, which is responsible for much of the trade in wildlife. Many wild animals in China are killed not for culinary reasons but for essentially magical ones. Whether it's tiger paws or pangolin scales, quack cures persist on a vast scale—even in cases like bear bile where a real active ingredient existed, has been discovered, and can be produced in labs without animal cruelty. The government has been heavily promoting traditional Chinese medicine, especially under President Xi Jinping's new nationalism, and while officially pharmaceutical companies following this model eschew the wildlife trade, the propaganda around such traditional medicine in general helps ensure belief survives."
Source:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/27/dont-blame-bat-soup-for-the-wuhan-virus/

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 02:42:02 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:43:15 PM
From Romania with love, to all GMGers!

Stay safe, obey all rules and restrictions imposed, keep strict hygienic rules and be optimistic! I wish you and all your loved ones and fellow countrymen all best of luck and very good health in these hard times!

As for myself, I'll isolate myself as much as I can together with my 79yo father which I can't leave because he can't move out from his bed and one of my maternal aunts 83yo who lives next door to us. My wife, 7yo son and my inlaws are isolated in a county 2 hours drive away fron Bucharest where no case has been reported as of yet.  As of yet the disease spreads in Romania at a moderate pace and I hope the trend will not going to
explode. The measures taken by the government proves quite effective, the irresponsibility of some people notwithstanding.

I'm sure that we all will get over this bloody crisis! May God and our own civic sense and respobsibility proect us alll!

Best of luck to you and yours my friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 02:44:16 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 19, 2020, 12:00:48 PM

To add to all this it it my daughter's birthday on Monday and we have invited her (we live in a quiet village) here to celebrate. However, she insists that we go up to London. She lives in West Dulwich which is one of the worst areas for Coronavirus infection. I explaned to her that this was like being invited for a birthday celebration in one of the main plague villages during the period of The Black Death. This at least amused some of my colleagues at work.

Out of concern for you my friend I would say do not go, Jeffrey.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 02:50:01 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 02:44:16 AM
Out of concern for you my friend I would say do not go, Jeffrey.

You should stay home, Jeffrey, and so should your daughter. It would be unpleasant but safe.

Romania update: 277 confirmed cases, 0 deaths, 25 cured.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 20, 2020, 02:51:38 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 20, 2020, 01:06:17 AM
My son works for a large company in the travel industry. He had someone on the phone yesterday demanding immediate refund of deposit paid for expensive holiday. It was explained to the client that the company were working through £millions worth of deposits which takes time and eventually his money will be returned. With this my son received a blast  - My business has gone. Today, I sacked a dozen employees and I am ruined - I want my (deleted) money NOW!

In the Netherlands, and I believe some other EU-countries, the travel industry has stopped refunding customers to avoid a total finacial collapse and are issuing vouchers instead.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 02:54:49 AM
Jeffrey, this may get you and your daughter already in the right mood. Congrats! But do stay at home.

https://www.youtube.com/v/AWdVtDrnIEE

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 03:02:36 AM
Xi Jinping has buried the truth about coronavirus

The reaction to the outbreak has revealed the unreconstructed despotism of the Chinese state



https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/26/the-reaction-to-the-outbreak-has-revealed-the-unreceonstructed-despotism-of-the-chinese-state
(https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/26/the-reaction-to-the-outbreak-has-revealed-the-unreceonstructed-despotism-of-the-chinese-state)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 03:12:10 AM
Latest update Romania: 308 confirmed, 31 cured, 0 deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 04:59:20 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 20, 2020, 01:06:17 AM
My son works for a large company in the travel industry. He had someone on the phone yesterday demanding immediate refund of deposit paid for expensive holiday. It was explained to the client that the company were working through £millions worth of deposits which takes time and eventually his money will be returned. With this my son received a blast  - My business has gone. Today, I sacked a dozen employees and I am ruined - I want my (deleted) money NOW!
Wow!   :o :(  Is your son afraid of losing his job?  Even temporarily?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 20, 2020, 05:09:55 AM
The whole Corona crisis is a scary thing.

My wife and I visited NY two weeks ago, had an enjoyable stay and did all sorts of stuff, including attending a performance of....The Flying Dutchman.

In hindsight that was the last performance at the Metropolitan Opera before it closed down.
Fortunately, unlike my countryman who was doomed the sail the seas until the end of times, our scheduled return flight left only 5 hours before the US travel ban for Europe went into force and many flights were cancelled.
The relief we felt when taking our seats at the plane of our national pride and the oldest airline in the world, good old Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM) ....

The plane actually didn't carry many Dutch passengers  and was mainly filled with people from other European countries and Russia, scrambling to get home. Two Italians informed with the crew whether there were still any connecting flights to Italy.... there weren't...

I had a short chat with the flight attendant, she was worried about the future of the company and her job. We now know that the Dutch govt. will be covering 90% of wages of all affected companies for at least the next 3 months. And I have no doubt that if things become even worse, a company like KLM would be nationalized. We are very fortunate that the Dutch govt has very deep pockets.. ..

When we returned home, I got groceries and we have been home ever since.

My personal observations on the Corona crisis:

1. Everyone of us will catch the virus eventually, unless we are inoculated with a vaccine before we get infected. Predictions are that this first wave will continue until at least 60% of the general population has been exposed to the virus and has developed immunity that will slow it down. It is highly unlikely that a vaccine will become widely available before that moment in many countries. But who knows,  perhaps a miracle will happen....

2. All that can be done now, is buying time and slowing down the spreading of the virus. The purpose would be to "flatten the curve", so as to avoid a collapse of the health care system needed to attend to the medical needs of those who are severely affected. The paradox of "flattening the curve" is however that by limiting the intensity of the epidemic, its duration (of the first wave) will be extended.

3. An alternative strategy to "flattening the curve" is containment. This is a viable course of action when there is a limited or concentrated number of cases, which can be traced and isolated. This has been tried/done in South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong. When cases are numerous and widely spread, containment can only be achieved by a total lockdown - literally locking up people in their homes. If containment is successfully achieved, there is a continuous risk of recurring outbreaks and the need for continuing any lockdown measures indefinitely, or at least until a vaccine is available. Example of successful containment of a virus: Ebola. Unsuccessful: HIV.

3. The global economic consequences of this crisis will be enormous. For the 98% of us who will survive the virus, the economic fall out and disruption of international trade will be a much bigger problem than the actual health threat.
I hope a collapse of the financial system and international supply chains can be prevented. But a global economic depression seems pretty likely.

4. Because the virus has initially spread through international travelling to affluent countries in the Western World and Asia, our current focus is on those countries. My concern is however, what will happen when the virus will spread in poor countries without highly developed health care or effective government? Just think about many countries in Africa and Asia, poverty stricken Venezuela, war-torn Syria, etc. The effects cannot be anything other than devastating....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Judith on March 20, 2020, 05:11:49 AM
Without being political, just wondering how you are all coping?
Must admit, getting me down. Not just the chance of catching illness itself but feel that life is on hold. No concerts, history talks, museums etc.
Am I feeling sorry for myself or anyone else feeling like I do?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: marvinbrown on March 20, 2020, 05:55:31 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 12, 2020, 07:03:50 PM
It seems appropriate to have  a dedicated thread to COVID 19, given it's a worldwide event.
So here it is.

  Remarkable how genetic garbage (come on let's get real here viruses are genetic garbage!) can wreck so much havoc!

  marvin
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 05:55:51 AM
Hi Judith, these are indeed very difficult and totally unusual & intimidating times. It is no wonder that we are feeling down. Especially since we don't know (and cannot predict) how long this crisis will last, nor how devastating its results will be.
So, let's focus on the positive aspects: the will to help, the courage and creativity of those who are already searching for solutions, the courage of all the people in the medical sector.
And do stay in contact with friends and family. And do post your thoughts here. Suggest music, talk about composers , musicians and performers, recordings.
Keep cool and stay positive!
Peter
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2020, 06:11:59 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.

((distant hugs))
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2020, 06:19:17 AM
Quote from: Judith on March 20, 2020, 05:11:49 AM
Without being political, just wondering how you are all coping?
Must admit, getting me down. Not just the chance of catching illness itself but feel that life is on hold. No concerts, history talks, museums etc.
Am I feeling sorry for myself or anyone else feeling like I do?

Coping as best I can: composing music, listening to lots of music, touching base with family and friends frequently.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 20, 2020, 06:33:31 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 05:55:51 AM
Hi Judith, these are indeed very difficult and totally unusual & intimidating times. It is no wonder that we are feeling down. Especially since we don't know (and cannot predict) how long this crisis will last, nor how devastating its results will be.
So, let's focus on the positive aspects: the will to help, the courage and creativity of those who are already searching for solutions, the courage of all the people in the medical sector.
And do stay in contact with friends and family. And do post your thoughts here. Suggest music, talk about composers , musicians and performers, recordings.
Keep cool and stay positive!
Peter

Time to catch up on cat videos...

https://www.youtube.com/v/4ArItwfAYyo
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 06:38:34 AM
Quote from: Judith on March 20, 2020, 05:11:49 AM
Without being political, just wondering how you are all coping?
Must admit, getting me down. Not just the chance of catching illness itself but feel that life is on hold. No concerts, history talks, museums etc.
Am I feeling sorry for myself or anyone else feeling like I do?

There is nothing unusual in what you are feeling. We all want things just to be normal again. That is a natural reaction in these kind of circumstances. You, like everybody, are looking for reassurance. Listen to the advice and follow the correct hygiene and social distancing protocols and stay safe. That is our number one priority. This will pass but it will take time, care, mental strength and the cooperation of all to get us through this. Be as strong as you can.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 20, 2020, 06:47:41 AM
There still seems to be no evidence of it affecting other animals. So just bats and humans? That's really weird.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 20, 2020, 07:12:33 AM
Quote from: Que on March 20, 2020, 02:51:38 AM
In the Netherlands, and I believe some other EU-countries, the travel industry has stopped refunding customers to avoid a total finacial collapse and are issuing vouchers instead.

Q

Which in these times is a sensible policy. We have paid a deposit (same company) for a holiday in November with balance due in August. I am happy for the deposit to be carried over for the following year if necessary.
As far as holidays are concerned Cruises will take a massive hit. They were just becoming more and more popular and companies such as P&O and Virgin have spent millions building new ships to match demand. It will take decades for them to recover from this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 20, 2020, 07:16:50 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 04:59:20 AM
Wow!   :o :(  Is your son afraid of losing his job?  Even temporarily?

Last Monday the company purchased 200 laptops and instructed staff to work from home. I think the whole world is afraid of losing their job, P.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 07:46:58 AM
Quote from: greg on March 20, 2020, 06:47:41 AM
There still seems to be no evidence of it affecting other animals. So just bats and humans? That's really weird.

it is very complicated, but for the moment the best information we have. Check chapter
"Natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer":

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DaveF on March 20, 2020, 07:53:57 AM
Quote from: Judith on March 20, 2020, 05:11:49 AM
Without being political, just wondering how you are all coping?
Must admit, getting me down. Not just the chance of catching illness itself but feel that life is on hold. No concerts, history talks, museums etc.
Am I feeling sorry for myself or anyone else feeling like I do?

Hi Judith,

Trying to keep going, as we all are, but agree it's deeply distressing and unsettling, and hard not to feel sorry for oneself.  I'm in the fortunate position of being in excellent health, my 60 years notwithstanding, having a guaranteed salary from my local government job and a house with no mortgage (albeit a second one that I'm trying to sell, with not surprisingly a complete lack of interest at the moment), so what it's like for those poor souls who have financial pressures on top of health worries I can't imagine.  Here in rural South Wales we haven't even seen the level of panic buying that has occurred elsewhere - the supermarket shelves are generally well-stocked, with only one or two shortage areas.  Although it has certainly been a day of "panic borrowing" in the library where I work.

I'm not that bothered about actually catching the virus - at least that would get it done with, and I'm fairly confident I'd survive without a problem.  The worry and concern spring more from the suspicion/certainty that those in charge have very little idea what is going on (and why should they? - it's never gone on before) and from the dread of being dependent for our future on the goodwill and selflessness of our fellow human beings, which with many notable exceptions seem to be generally wanting.  I cast around for the good news stories that I'm sure are out there, but there almost seems to be a conspiracy of silence - I read somewhere that new cases in China have fallen away almost to nothing, but try finding that statistic anywhere online.  Another small bit is that a cousin of mine in London, aged 39, has been suffering from it for 2 days and already feels much better.

Schubert's the man - had it worst of all and kept singing and dancing.

DF
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on March 20, 2020, 07:58:32 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.

Oh boy, that sounds terrible, I hope a manageable way through it appears. Best of luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on March 20, 2020, 08:28:33 AM
And yes, in answer to Judith's point, I think a large part of the battle against this thing will be psychological one, both individual and group. If a feeling of hope can be engendered/stumbled upon, I think it will impact behaviour at all levels in a significant way, right up to government. Hope you can find a bit of buoyancy, Judith.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 20, 2020, 08:38:01 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 19, 2020, 07:50:56 PM
Whoa. I feel for YOU! I can only say that I hope you (and your family) stay safe and healthy.

Thank you.

Quote from: Iota on March 20, 2020, 07:58:32 AM
Oh boy, that sounds terrible, I hope a manageable way through it appears. Best of luck!

It has to.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 20, 2020, 06:11:59 AM
((distant hugs))

Returned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 08:57:04 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.
Oh, boy!  Trying to think of what you could do?  Perhaps contact 1) a state agency to tell them what your predicament is and what you could do?  2) Maybe talk to your real estate agent and see if you could rent your home for a while from new owners (which leads me to wonder whether or not they could even move in due to the new restrictions?) 3) Keep in contact with your new employer regarding everything going on.

Warm wishes to you and hang in there!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 10:34:36 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 19, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
If you can believe it was laid off just before Christmas (company financially failing) found a better job, sold the house in California, rented a house in Houston, Texas where I will be working, am on payroll pending relocation. Movers are supposed to come on April 2, My wife and I had planned to drive with our young child to Houston, and did I mention my wife is pregnant?

Now, with confirmed cases growing exponentially in California, the governor has issued a "stay at home order," and effective next week we have no home. We are wondering if we will find travel forbidden, or travel hotels along the route shuttered.

Being stuck at home, watching Netflix and nervously checking dwindling checking accounts and 401Ks seems like paradise to me. I fully expect I could be dead before a month has past, and that is not the worst scenario I can imagine.

Kind wishes, best of luck and stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Judith on March 20, 2020, 10:37:10 AM
Quote from: Iota on March 20, 2020, 08:28:33 AM
And yes, in answer to Judith's point, I think a large part of the battle against this thing will be psychological one, both individual and group. If a feeling of hope can be engendered/stumbled upon, I think it will impact behaviour at all levels in a significant way, right up to government. Hope you can find a bit of buoyancy, Judith.
Thank you for your thoughts
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Judith on March 20, 2020, 10:38:34 AM
Quote from: DaveF on March 20, 2020, 07:53:57 AM
Hi Judith,

Trying to keep going, as we all are, but agree it's deeply distressing and unsettling, and hard not to feel sorry for oneself.  I'm in the fortunate position of being in excellent health, my 60 years notwithstanding, having a guaranteed salary from my local government job and a house with no mortgage (albeit a second one that I'm trying to sell, with not surprisingly a complete lack of interest at the moment), so what it's like for those poor souls who have financial pressures on top of health worries I can't imagine.  Here in rural South Wales we haven't even seen the level of panic buying that has occurred elsewhere - the supermarket shelves are generally well-stocked, with only one or two shortage areas.  Although it has certainly been a day of "panic borrowing" in the library where I work.

I'm not that bothered about actually catching the virus - at least that would get it done with, and I'm fairly confident I'd survive without a problem.  The worry and concern spring more from the suspicion/certainty that those in charge have very little idea what is going on (and why should they? - it's never gone on before) and from the dread of being dependent for our future on the goodwill and selflessness of our fellow human beings, which with many notable exceptions seem to be generally wanting.  I cast around for the good news stories that I'm sure are out there, but there almost seems to be a conspiracy of silence - I read somewhere that new cases in China have fallen away almost to nothing, but try finding that statistic anywhere online.  Another small bit is that a cousin of mine in London, aged 39, has been suffering from it for 2 days and already feels much better.

Schubert's the man - had it worst of all and kept singing and dancing.

DF
Thank you for your kind words
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 10:39:02 AM
Quote from: DaveF on March 20, 2020, 07:53:57 AM
Schubert's the man - had it worst of all and kept singing and dancing.

Indeed.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Judith on March 20, 2020, 10:39:35 AM
Quote from: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 06:38:34 AM
There is nothing unusual in what you are feeling. We all want things just to be normal again. That is a natural reaction in these kind of circumstances. You, like everybody, are looking for reassurance. Listen to the advice and follow the correct hygiene and social distancing protocols and stay safe. That is our number one priority. This will pass but it will take time, care, mental strength and the cooperation of all to get us through this. Be as strong as you can.
Thank you so much
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Judith on March 20, 2020, 10:40:51 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 05:55:51 AM
Hi Judith, these are indeed very difficult and totally unusual & intimidating times. It is no wonder that we are feeling down. Especially since we don't know (and cannot predict) how long this crisis will last, nor how devastating its results will be.
So, let's focus on the positive aspects: the will to help, the courage and creativity of those who are already searching for solutions, the courage of all the people in the medical sector.
And do stay in contact with friends and family. And do post your thoughts here. Suggest music, talk about composers , musicians and performers, recordings.
Keep cool and stay positive!
Peter
Thank you so much
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 20, 2020, 10:43:46 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 08:57:04 AM
Oh, boy!  Trying to think of what you could do?  Perhaps contact 1) a state agency to tell them what your predicament is and what you could do?  2) Maybe talk to your real estate agent and see if you could rent your home for a while from new owners (which leads me to wonder whether or not they could even move in due to the new restrictions?) 3) Keep in contact with your new employer regarding everything going on.

Warm wishes to you and hang in there!

PD

I second PD's second point, at least.  Even if they weren't planning to move in immediately, any renovation plans they had must be on hold.
And that's assuming their own financial position hasn't suffered severely!

Best of luck, and stay healthy, all four of you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 20, 2020, 10:46:07 AM
Quote from: Que on March 20, 2020, 05:09:55 AM

3. When cases are numerous and widely spread, containment can only be achieved by a total lockdown - literally locking up people in their homes.

Boris has just said that his scientists have told him that he needs to achieve a 75% reduction in social contact. Not 100%

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 10:46:29 AM
Judith, think how fortunate we all here are: our hobbies (music, literature, fine arts) are actually tailor-made for such dire times and situations and should make our social isolation easier to endure. Concentrate on whatever you like and forget everything else. Better times are ahead.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 20, 2020, 10:58:42 AM
For those of us in the US:

Animal Planet channel is running an all day marathon of Too Cute. Reality TV show starring newborn kitties and puppies as they grow in their first year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 10:59:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 02:50:01 AM
You should stay home, Jeffrey, and so should your daughter. It would be unpleasant but safe.

Romania update: 277 confirmed cases, 0 deaths, 25 cured.

Thank you Andrei and Fergus. Her two flat-mates have symptoms now so it looks like we will not be meeting up until such time as it is safe to do so. I told my students at school today ( before it closed down tonight) to try to see it as an extraordinary historical event and not just something to be anxious about. They will remember it for the rest of their lives. Some of them are secretly quite pleased about not having to sit their public exams whilst others are disappointed.
I'm pleased that there have been no fatalities in Romania.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:02:55 AM
This is a popular thread isn't it? And probably necessary at this time. All thanks to Jeffrey (the other one) for starting it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:11:53 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 19, 2020, 12:43:15 PM
From Romania with love, to all GMGers!

Stay safe, obey all rules and restrictions imposed, keep strict hygienic rules and be optimistic! I wish you and all your loved ones and fellow countrymen all best of luck and very good health in these hard times!

As for myself, I'll isolate myself as much as I can together with my 79yo father which I can't leave because he can't move out from his bed and one of my maternal aunts 83yo who lives next door to us. My wife, 7yo son and my inlaws are isolated in a county 2 hours drive away fron Bucharest where no case has been reported as of yet.  As of yet the disease spreads in Romania at a moderate pace and I hope the trend will not going to
explode. The measures taken by the government proves quite effective, the irresponsibility of some people notwithstanding.

I'm sure that we all will get over this bloody crisis! May God and our own civic sense and respobsibility proect us alll!
All strength to you Andrei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 11:12:20 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:02:55 AM
This is a popular thread isn't it? And probably necessary at this time. All thanks to Jeffrey (the other one) for starting it.

Indeed, it helps to get away from cooking, cleaning, reading, browsing through cds, checking phones, watching TV...
I try to walk regularly & I made a 2 hour bike tour with a friend. Fresh air!

Kindest regards!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:16:45 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 18, 2020, 11:11:09 PM
I'm assuming that your school has a Learning Management System (LMS) and this is how they will remotely deliver the program. Our LMS is set up at the beginning of the school year with the whole program already there. It means that staff, students and parents can access it. It includes lessons, assessment, communications and the ability to submit work electronically.

I've been asked to set up work for the students in a specific year level on a week by week basis, just in case the Government decides we should close. All I had to do was create a small vodcast showing students what they had to do by pointing to the parts of the system where they could get the already set up programs.

If your school doesn't have an LMS then yes, you might easily have a tech nightmare.
I've had more support from the IT team at the school and also kind colleagues. I even managed to communicate with my classes via the IT online system, where we can see each other (like a Skype call). as we were all  in the same room it sounded like a lot of screaming Daleks from Dr Who trying to communicate, with continuous loud echoes. Still. As Lao Tse said 'The Journey of 1000 Miles starts with one step'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:17:16 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 11:12:20 AM
Indeed, it helps to get away from cooking, cleaning, reading, browsing through cds, checking phones, watching TV...
I try to walk regularly & I made a 2 hour bike tour with a friend. Fresh air!

Kindest regards!

You too  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 20, 2020, 11:32:29 AM
I went to see an apartment that I'm interested in renting and had an eerie, although pleasant walk through the oldest parts of Prague – the Lesser Quarter and the Old Town, connected by the Charles Bridge. Usually bursting with tourists, the streets were expectedly deserted. I had to stop and shoot a short video (https://twitter.com/janchor/status/1241074940155252739) as the silence reminded of the 2002 flood, when I was working on the cleanup and cars and tourists were prohibited to enter the Old Town.

It was a nice little moment of respite. Stay safe, you wonderful bunch of people!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on March 20, 2020, 11:53:27 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 10:46:29 AM
Judith, think how fortunate we all here are: our hobbies (music, literature, fine arts) are actually tailor-made for such dire times and situations and should make our social isolation easier to endure. Concentrate on whatever you like and forget everything else. Better times are ahead.

All good points.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 12:15:07 PM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 11:12:20 AM
I made a 2 hour bike tour with a friend. Fresh air!

Wait a minute! Everywhere in Europe authorities urge people to stay home, stay home, stay home and not get out unless for food or drugs and yet you take a 2 hour bike tour?  :o :o :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 20, 2020, 12:29:48 PM
https://www.youtube.com/v/3xt58OVnmXU
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 20, 2020, 12:34:46 PM
(https://d3thpuk46eyjbu.cloudfront.net/uploads/production/4352/1582837648/original/LernerCDCParodyBeardsMcSweeneys.gif?1582837648)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 20, 2020, 12:38:53 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 20, 2020, 10:58:42 AM
For those of us in the US:

Animal Planet channel is running an all day marathon of Too Cute. Reality TV show starring newborn kitties and puppies as they grow in their first year.
Love that show. The shots they get are really amazing, and we enjoy the pitter patter of the narrator.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 01:26:10 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 20, 2020, 12:15:07 PM
Wait a minute! Everywhere in Europe authorities urge people to stay home, stay home, stay home and not get out unless for food or drugs and yet you take a 2 hour bike tour?  :o :o :o

Yes, the government encourages people to go for walks and/or bicycle rides, do sports, run... BUT: only with your direct family or the people who live in the same house. 1 friend is allowed, if all the other safety measures are respected: keep 1.5 m distance at all times, do not pick nick, barbecue etc. Use tissues to blow your nose etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 20, 2020, 01:28:36 PM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 01:26:10 PM
Yes, the government encourages people to go for walks and/or bicycle rides, do sports, run... BUT: only with your direct family or the people who live in the same house. 1 friend is allowed, if all the other safety measures are respected: keep 1.5 m distance at all times, do not pick nick, barbecue etc. Use tissues to blow your nose etc.

You mean 1.5 meters, right?

My American brain read first read that to mean 1.5 miles. :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 20, 2020, 02:02:34 PM
Yes meters!

And a Belgian romantic trifle  for the night:

https://www.youtube.com/v/vU-hVwRkx-M

Tomorrow: Enter spring!


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 20, 2020, 02:14:08 PM
All pubs, restaurants and gyms in the UK to close tonight and remained closed until further notice.

The new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak - who is playing a blinder - after consulting Unions and CBI has announced that to save employees being sacked the Government will subsidise their pay to the tune of 80%.

I have this feeling that when eventually this is all over we will all be poorer but just maybe the world will be a better place. It will be different that is certain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 20, 2020, 02:41:32 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 20, 2020, 02:14:08 PM


I have this feeling that when eventually this is all over we will all be poorer but just maybe the world will be a better place. It will be different that is certain.

     If it's a better place it won't be poorer for long. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2020, 02:47:20 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 20, 2020, 02:41:32 PM
     If it's a better place it won't be poorer for long. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

Hear, hear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2020, 02:47:49 PM
Winthrop man, 87, is 1st coronavirus death in Massachusetts as case tally rises to more than 400
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 02:56:27 PM
Quote from: Judith on March 20, 2020, 05:11:49 AM
Without being political, just wondering how you are all coping?
Must admit, getting me down. Not just the chance of catching illness itself but feel that life is on hold. No concerts, history talks, museums etc.
Am I feeling sorry for myself or anyone else feeling like I do?
Hi Judith,

It's hard to adjust to everything that is going on to say the least.  I don't know what kind of area you live in, but I find being out in Mother Nature helps.  Going for a walk/hike or if possible, working in your yard (if you have one) or allotment.  Culturally, well (see a different thread) there  have been and I think will be some free online concerts.  Though you can't go to them for the time being, there are a lot of online resources...perhaps checkout artists' websites or youtube, or learn more about favorite artists (checkout various scholarly articles), try some different apps or sites to learn a language....there are websites like the Ralph Vaughan Williams Society's website with free articles.  There are also e-books which one can check out from your library (and related ones) system.

The best thing, I think, is to keep in contact with the people that matter to you:  friends, family....think about reaching out to neighbors and friends who are older and maybe don't get out very often.

I know that it's hard, but hang in there; we'll make it through....somehow, someway.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:00:57 PM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 20, 2020, 11:32:29 AM
I went to see an apartment that I'm interested in renting and had an eerie, although pleasant walk through the oldest parts of Prague – the Lesser Quarter and the Old Town, connected by the Charles Bridge. Usually bursting with tourists, the streets were expectedly deserted. I had to stop and shoot a short video (https://twitter.com/janchor/status/1241074940155252739) as the silence reminded of the 2002 flood, when I was working on the cleanup and cars and tourists were prohibited to enter the Old Town.

It was a nice little moment of respite. Stay safe, you wonderful bunch of people!
Wow, how strange (I checked out your video)!  That said, very quiet here in my town....little traffic.  Would love to visit Prague someday...such a beautiful country and I love your music.

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:09:12 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 20, 2020, 07:16:50 AM
Last Monday the company purchased 200 laptops and instructed staff to work from home. I think the whole world is afraid of losing their job, P.
I know, I know....just still hard to hear.  I'm glad that he still has a job though.  Stores have closed (hopefully temporarily) around here.  We are, how do I say this, "proud" of being supportive of our local businesses around here (at least a good chunk of the local population is), so it's hard to say, but I think that they are doing the right thing by voluntarily closing; the question being though:  will they be able to survive?  Can they and/or will they try to still pay their employees as time goes on? 

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:20:59 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 20, 2020, 10:43:46 AM
I second PD's second point, at least.  Even if they weren't planning to move in immediately, any renovation plans they had must be on hold.
And that's assuming their own financial position hasn't suffered severely!

Best of luck, and stay healthy, all four of you.
Hi JBS,

I am trying to figure out exactly what the California governor means...saw a Twitter website....what is "essential"?

So, are/will the buyers be allowed to move??  Perhaps they are supposed to stay where they are living?  And maybe they are also in a similar situation too and like JBS said, they could also be trying to figure out their financial issues/problems?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:22:07 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 20, 2020, 11:16:45 AM
I've had more support from the IT team at the school and also kind colleagues. I even managed to communicate with my classes via the IT online system, where we can see each other (like a Skype call). as we were all  in the same room it sounded like a lot of screaming Daleks from Dr Who trying to communicate, with continuous loud echoes. Still. As Lao Tse said 'The Journey of 1000 Miles starts with one step'.
Hey, progress!   ;D

And thanks for making me laugh too...that's very important right now.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 20, 2020, 09:30:38 PM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 20, 2020, 11:32:29 AM
I went to see an apartment that I'm interested in renting and had an eerie, although pleasant walk through the oldest parts of Prague – the Lesser Quarter and the Old Town, connected by the Charles Bridge. Usually bursting with tourists, the streets were expectedly deserted. I had to stop and shoot a short video (https://twitter.com/janchor/status/1241074940155252739) as the silence reminded of the 2002 flood, when I was working on the cleanup and cars and tourists were prohibited to enter the Old Town.

It was a nice little moment of respite. Stay safe, you wonderful bunch of people!

Wow that was quiet, not even a car manufacturer making an unrealistic commercial!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on March 20, 2020, 10:51:17 PM
Quote from: pjme on March 20, 2020, 01:26:10 PM
Yes, the government encourages people to go for walks and/or bicycle rides, do sports, run... BUT: only with your direct family or the people who live in the same house. 1 friend is allowed, if all the other safety measures are respected: keep 1.5 m distance at all times, do not pick nick, barbecue etc. Use tissues to blow your nose etc.

The same in Milan till last night. From this morning all those activities have been forbidden.
We had a delegation of Chinese experts visiting the city. They said that there were still too many people outside.
We have to stay at home. Period.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 20, 2020, 11:00:00 PM
Welcome in the Netherlands. :(

So far, the Dutch government has been rather 'soft' on regulation, compared to many other countries.
Nevertheless parts of the population are still neglecting these rules on a pretty high scale.
Especially the younger generations still come together in groups, they still hug and shake hands.
(Research, amongst 15.000 respondents, was done by the Amsterdam University Hospital.)

(https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB11uhIn.img?h=554&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f&x=2333&y=444)

Yep, this Corona virus is nothing special, just the elderly and the weak will die. So what's new? :(

Sad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 12:42:18 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 20, 2020, 11:00:00 PM
Yep, this Corona virus is nothing special, just the elderly and the weak will die. So what's new? :(

Sad.

Other viruses also kill elderly and the weak, but at least we have methods like vaccination and medicine to deal with them. Corona virus is "special", because the treatments don't exist and most people don't have functioning immune system yet so the elderly and the weak fill fast the hospitals requiring intensive care and the whole healthcare system is in danger of collapsing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 12:54:06 AM
Imo this lady is absolutely right.  :)

https://www.youtube.com/v/H7_wvQHMGOI
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 21, 2020, 12:58:17 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 12:42:18 AM
Other viruses also kill elderly and the weak, but at least we have methods like vaccination and medicine to deal with them. Corona virus is "special", because the treatments don't exist and most people don't have functioning immune system yet so the elderly and the weak fill fast the hospitals requiring intensive care and the whole healthcare system is in danger of collapsing.

I know, Poju.
Which, to me, makes this an entirely different situation.
I've been trying to explain the same to other people, too. They keep shrugging their shoulders and saying: it's just panic for nothing. I'm not gonna stay home when I don't want to.
I'm very unhappy with these 'nay' sayers, especially when they neglect the advices and regulations (whilst others do their utmost to obey), and also try to convince other people to neglect the problem, too. Because things aren't going all that well in this country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:07:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 12:54:06 AM
Imo this lady is absolutely right.  :)

https://www.youtube.com/v/H7_wvQHMGOI

"What, have I got a band in my house? I can't read music!"
"Now our children will find out how dumb we are."

:laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 21, 2020, 01:10:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:09:12 PM
I know, I know....just still hard to hear.  I'm glad that he still has a job though.  Stores have closed (hopefully temporarily) around here.  We are, how do I say this, "proud" of being supportive of our local businesses around here (at least a good chunk of the local population is), so it's hard to say, but I think that they are doing the right thing by voluntarily closing; the question being though:  will they be able to survive?  Can they and/or will they try to still pay their employees as time goes on? 

PD

A small business would not last five minutes, P. They would sack their staff and then go bust. The UK Government are taking a massive gamble with essentially paying the workforce themselves. A policy that Lenin would be proud of. They are trying to see out the crises before the economy collapses completely but I worry that this is unsustainable for any length of time.
The news from Italy just gets worse. They have now overtaken China in deaths.

You make a good point shopping locally. The big supermarkets have been hit by a swarm of locusts. We did feel a sense of panic to be confronted by empty shelves. We are now shopping locally and managing fine but have to be early.   

Edit: https://youtu.be/XzdRs9LPj2M
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 21, 2020, 01:11:45 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:07:07 AM
"What, have I got a band in my house? I can't read music!"
"Now our children will find out how dumb we are."

:laugh:

Love her.
But I won't be allowed to give her a hug... shalom to her though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:18:46 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 21, 2020, 12:58:17 AM
I know, Poju.
Which, to me, makes this an entirely different situation.
I've been trying to explain the same to other people, too. They keep shrugging their shoulders and saying: it's just panic for nothing. I'm not gonna stay home when I don't want to.
I'm very unhappy with these 'nay' sayers, especially when they neglect the advices and regulations (whilst others do their utmost to obey), and also try to convince other people to neglect the problem, too. Because things aren't going all that well in this country.

People don't know how it is in the hospitals. Also, this crisis came fast so people can't understand what is going on. Just week ago I was visiting my dad, but last Monday we realized we have to stop the visits to protect him as the situation escalated in Finland (we come a week behind other Nordic countries in this). Since last Monday I have tried to follow the instructions. I really want to see my dad, but what can you do? I suppose one day this is over and we can go back to "normal"...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 21, 2020, 02:56:26 AM
The Financial Times keeps track of the numbers:

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Febcfb388-6ae3-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 03:19:06 AM
Just a couple of questions about the UK, though they may well apply to other places, people may know the answer.

1. The strategy of widespread community testing and isolation which has been happening in South Korea looks as though it's successful at flattening the curve. I think it's in line with WHO recommendations. Why aren't the UK doing it?

2. It looks to me as though the government are following a model which says, basically, reduce people's freedom as the number of new cases increases -- so we can expect shops to close, and parks etc, over the next couple of weeks, and maybe the police will start to stop and ask people why they're on the streets, with associated fines. If I'm right, has the model been published?
mandryka
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 03:59:50 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 21, 2020, 01:10:18 AM
A small business would not last five minutes, P. They would sack their staff and then go bust. The UK Government are taking a massive gamble with essentially paying the workforce themselves. A policy that Lenin would be proud of. They are trying to see out the crises before the economy collapses completely but I worry that this is unsustainable for any length of time.
The news from Italy just gets worse. They have now overtaken China in deaths.

You make a good point shopping locally. The big supermarkets have been hit by a swarm of locusts. We did feel a sense of panic to be confronted by empty shelves. We are now shopping locally and managing fine but have to be early.   

Edit: https://youtu.be/XzdRs9LPj2M
Good to hear that you and 'your better half' are doing well.  Haven't been *grocery shopping for about a week but did notice when last in a big pharmacy chain that they had put limits on certain things (like baby wipes).  Need to get together a list within the next few days though.  As you mentioned, it's important to get there early.  Trying not to be greedy and think of what do I really NEED.  Felt for that poor nurse in your video link!  She, obviously, can't set her work hours and is at the mercy of how others act.  I hope that there were some kind folks who responded by donating some of their food to her?  Or that one of the grocery stores reached out to her?  Any further news Irons?
*short of picking up a head of broccoli at a small local store

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 04:25:31 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 20, 2020, 02:14:08 PM
All pubs, restaurants and gyms in the UK to close tonight and remained closed until further notice.

The new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak - who is playing a blinder - after consulting Unions and CBI has announced that to save employees being sacked the Government will subsidise their pay to the tune of 80%.

I have this feeling that when eventually this is all over we will all be poorer but just maybe the world will be a better place. It will be different that is certain.
Yes, I agree Lol. The world will be a different and, who knows, possibly better, kinder place with less pollution and people taking more care of each other. Maybe this is naively optimistic but who knows. An article in the Times today encouraged us to keep a written record of these extraordinary times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 21, 2020, 04:29:45 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 03:19:06 AM
1. The strategy of widespread community testing and isolation which has been happening in South Korea looks as though it's successful at flattening the curve. I think it's in line with WHO recommendations. Why aren't the UK doing it?

Shortage of testing kits may play a role.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 04:35:10 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2020, 03:22:07 PM
Hey, progress!   ;D

And thanks for making me laugh too...that's very important right now.   :)

PD

Good to know!

The dispute with my wife as to whether or not she should continue to go to gym (her 'Yes', myself and daughter 'No') has come to an end as the gym has closed down! The Times today had a page of advice for exercising at home. They suggest for over 70s (which I'm not) to practice standing on one leg for 20 seconds or more. I can manage about four seconds. But the good news is that you are allowed to hang onto the wash basin to prevent you toppling over on to the floor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spineur on March 21, 2020, 04:40:08 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 04:35:10 AM
Good to know!

The dispute with my wife as to whether or not she should continue to go to gym (her 'Yes', myself and daughter 'No') has come to an end as the gym has closed down! The Times today had a page of advice for exercising at home. They suggest for over 70s (which I'm not) to practice standing on one leg for 20 seconds or more. I can manage about four seconds. But the good news is that you are allowed to hang onto the wash basin to prevent you toppling over on to the floor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 21, 2020, 04:52:10 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 03:19:06 AM
Just a couple of questions about the UK, though they may well apply to other places, people may know the answer.

1. The strategy of widespread community testing and isolation which has been happening in South Korea looks as though it's successful at flattening the curve. I think it's in line with WHO recommendations. Why aren't the UK doing it?

2. It looks to me as though the government are following a model which says, basically, reduce people's freedom as the number of new cases increases -- so we can expect shops to close, and parks etc, over the next couple of weeks, and maybe the police will start to stop and ask people why they're on the streets, with associated fines. If I'm right, has the model been published?
mandryka

Asian countires were far more alert and better prepared, because they were affected by the SARS epidemic and learned important lessons from that. I'm afraid that Western "exceptionalism" also played a very negative role in this....
Trump still calls this the "Chinese virus"... Perhaps someone should try to explain to him that the virus doesn't care?

Coronavirus: What could the West learn from Asia? (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51970379)

Q

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 05:31:34 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 04:35:10 AM
Good to know!

The dispute with my wife as to whether or not she should continue to go to gym (her 'Yes', myself and daughter 'No') has come to an end as the gym has closed down! The Times today had a page of advice for exercising at home. They suggest for over 70s (which I'm not) to practice standing on one leg for 20 seconds or more. I can manage about four seconds. But the good news is that you are allowed to hang onto the wash basin to prevent you toppling over on to the floor.
There was a segment on a talk show the other day of how one could exercise at home; one bit, used jugs of water and/or cans of food in a kind of tote bag (equal weight in two bags) and doing arm lifts and squats holding them.  Perhaps you could have a family workout time?  Maybe burn a CD of favorite songs with a variety of tempos to aid you?  I'm lucky in that there are some areas not to far away where one can walk/hike/jog/run without seeing to many people.  I also need to get more yard work done.   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 05:34:28 AM
Quote from: Spineur on March 21, 2020, 04:40:08 AM

Nice to see that Babar is staying fit! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 06:42:05 AM
Quote from: Que on March 21, 2020, 04:52:10 AM
Asian countires were far more alert and better prepared, because they were affected by the SARS epidemic and learned important lessons from that. I'm afraid that Western "exceptionalism" also played a very negative role in this....
Trump still calls this the "Chinese virus"... Perhaps someone should try to explain to him that the virus doesn't care?

Coronavirus: What could the West learn from Asia? (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51970379)

Q

What adds insult to injury is that the tests we don't have in the UK are made in the UK.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/randox-ships-covid-19-test-kits-to-wuhan-hospitals-1.4190697?mode=amp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 06:46:53 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 03:19:06 AM
Just a couple of questions about the UK, though they may well apply to other places, people may know the answer.

1. The strategy of widespread community testing and isolation which has been happening in South Korea looks as though it's successful at flattening the curve. I think it's in line with WHO recommendations. Why aren't the UK doing it?

Ask Boris Johnson.

Quote2. It looks to me as though the government are following a model which says, basically, reduce people's freedom as the number of new cases increases

A responsible government should reduce people's freedom long before the number of new cases increases; actually, if they do that early, the number of cases will increase nevertheless but not exponentially, and this is crucial. The idea is not to stop the epidemic, which is impossible, but to slow it down as much as possible, in order not to crush the medical system and to give scientists time to develop and test treatments and vaccins.




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 06:52:08 AM
Quote from: Que on March 21, 2020, 04:52:10 AM
Trump still calls this the "Chinese virus"... Perhaps someone should try to explain to him that the virus doesn't care?

I beg to differ. If the Chinese authorities had taken the whole damn thing seriously when it started and imposed draconian restrictions right from the beginning, they would have contained it locally and it would haven't spread across the whole world, especially Europe. They didn't because of their bloody fucking communism allied with their bloody fucking nationalism --- and now we are all in deep shit. I'm sorry, but this is a Chinese virus --- as opposed to the so-called Spanish Flu, which was not Spanish at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 06:55:10 AM
     As of this morning, here are the totals for cases and deaths:

(https://i.imgur.com/nNsLFRV.png)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 06:58:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 06:46:53 AM
Ask Boris Johnson.

A responsible government should reduce people's freedom long before the number of new cases increases; actually, if they do that early, the number of cases will increase nevertheless but not exponentially, and this is crucial. The idea is not to stop the epidemic, which is impossible, but to slow it down as much as possible, in order not to crush the medical system and to give scientists time to develop and test treatments and vaccins.

It's not so simple because you need the people to comply. Otherwise there'll be widespread civil disobedience. They will only comply when they "grok" the seriousness. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 06:59:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 06:52:08 AM
I beg to differ. If the Chinese authorities had taken the whole damn thing seriously when it started and imposed draconian restrictions right from the beginning, they would have contained it locally and it would haven't spread across the whole world, especially Europe. They didn't because of their bloody fucking communism allied with their bloody fucking nationalism --- and now we are all in deep shit. I'm sorry, but this is a Chinese virus --- as opposed to the so-called Spanish Flu, which was not Spanish at all.

     The virus thrives in an authoritarian environment in which doctors and health experts are threatened or at least told to shut up.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 21, 2020, 07:03:12 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 06:55:10 AM
     As of this morning, here are the totals for cases and deaths:

(https://i.imgur.com/nNsLFRV.png)

   

Bear in mind that the Chinese figures assume
1)regional authorities in China are being honest with the national authorities
2) the national authorities ars being honest with the rest of the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 06:55:10 AM
     As of this morning, here are the totals for cases and deaths:

(https://i.imgur.com/nNsLFRV.png)

   

The problem is that testing is different in each country, so the number of detected cases is a different proportion of the number of actual cases in each state.

(Terrible English but you know what I mean!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 07:12:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
The problem is that testing is different in each country, so the number of detected cases is a different proportion of the number of actual cases in each state.

(Terrible English but you know what I mean!)

     I do, and as testing is ramping up in the US we'll soon pass Spain in the number of cases.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 21, 2020, 07:36:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 06:52:08 AM
I beg to differ. If the Chinese authorities had taken the whole damn thing seriously when it started and imposed draconian restrictions right from the beginning, they would have contained it locally and it would haven't spread across the whole world, especially Europe. They didn't because of their bloody fucking communism allied with their bloody fucking nationalism --- and now we are all in deep shit. I'm sorry, but this is a Chinese virus --- as opposed to the so-called Spanish Flu, which was not Spanish at all.

Off course, the virus originates in China and and the Chinese authorities bear a lot of responsibility for its spread.

However, the virus is not Chinese in the sense that it only affects China. The mistake that was made in the West is to think that it wouldn't affect us. Authorities outside of China, including the US, had indications in January that an alarming situation was developing in China.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 07:37:50 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 06:58:23 AM
It's not so simple because you need the people to comply. Otherwise there'll be widespread civil disobedience. They will only comply when they "grok" the seriousness.

Rational, responsible, civic-conscious, altruistic people will comply. All other people must be forced to comply. There is no alternative. This is one of those hard times when teh choice is between personal freedom and the life of others. What do you choose?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 21, 2020, 07:38:44 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
The problem is that testing is different in each country, so the number of detected cases is a different proportion of the number of actual cases in each state.

Precisely. And this is part of the confusion everywhere.

Quote from: Mandryka
(Terrible English but you know what I mean!)

Not worse than my English.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 07:42:13 AM
Quote from: Que on March 21, 2020, 07:36:29 AM
Off course, the virus originates in China and and the Chinese authorities bear a lot of responsibility for its spread.

Precisely, and in this respect calling it a Chinese virus is neither mistaken nor racist --- it's simply stating a fact. Trump is wrong on a myriad other issues but on this one he's spot on.

Quotethe virus is not Chinese in the sense that it only affects China. The mistake that was made in the West is to think that it wouldn't affect us. Authorities outside of China, including the US, had indications in January that an alarming situation was developing in China.

Agreed 100%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 21, 2020, 07:43:30 AM
A very good explanation of how you attack an RNA virus, especially in the corona family

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/03/covid-19-the-biology-of-an-effective-therapy/

Most interesting is the bit about why they tried chloroquine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 07:45:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
The problem is that testing is different in each country, so the number of detected cases is a different proportion of the number of actual cases in each state.

The number of officially confirmed cases in each country is most probably less than the total number of people infected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 08:21:03 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 21, 2020, 07:03:12 AM
Bear in mind that the Chinese figures assume
1)regional authorities in China are being honest with the national authorities
2) the national authorities ars being honest with the rest of the world.

     I think the numbers are good enough to form an accurate picture. Right now I think the suppression factor is most evident in the U.S. and Iran, for related though not identical reasons, a matter of degree between strict v. "aspirational" authoritarianism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 08:39:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 07:45:35 AM
The number of officially confirmed cases in each country is most probably less than the total number of people infected.

Correct. And in some states most of the cases diagnosed are ones which are so serious they need medical intervention. So it's impossible to draw any conclusions from the ratio of deaths to detected cases. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 21, 2020, 08:40:35 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 06:55:10 AM
     As of this morning, here are the totals for cases and deaths:

(https://i.imgur.com/nNsLFRV.png)

   

Looking at this, what I'm wondering is: why does France have fewer cases than Germany, but almost 10X as many deaths?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 21, 2020, 08:45:53 AM
Probably depends if tests are done preventively, or post-facto, once symptoms have been detected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 08:54:38 AM
And on the number of ITU beds. But yes, Germany I think tests people with mild symptoms and isolates them; I'm pretty sure France only tests people whose symptoms are so severe they need to call emergency services.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 09:02:20 AM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on March 21, 2020, 08:40:35 AM
Looking at this, what I'm wondering is: why does France have fewer cases than Germany, but almost 10X as many deaths?

     I almost commented on this very point, France and Germany, or in the US context, similar disparities among the states.

     Georgia and Michigan are experiencing rapid growth in recorded cases, faster now than NY state. Washington state appears to be leveling off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 09:08:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 07:04:27 AM
The problem is that testing is different in each country, so the number of detected cases is a different proportion of the number of actual cases in each state.

(Terrible English but you know what I mean!)
I was surprised at how high the number of cases were/are in Switzerland!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 21, 2020, 09:11:19 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 04:25:31 AM
Yes, I agree Lol. The world will be a different and, who knows, possibly better, kinder place with less pollution and people taking more care of each other. Maybe this is naively optimistic but who knows. An article in the Times today encouraged us to keep a written record of these extraordinary times.

I do not think it naive, Jeffrey. Working from home, when possible, needed a trigger this is a thunderbolt! Why would companies pay millions for offices in the capitals of the world when they can perform just as effectively with modern communications without? As you say, this would result in less pollution and stress.
I count myself a part of the lucky generation - missed the war, swinging sixties, cheap mortgages and excellent healthcare. Our kids have it much harder. So time for us to get through this, in one piece hopefully.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 09:11:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 06:42:05 AM
What adds insult to injury is that the tests we don't have in the UK are made in the UK.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/randox-ships-covid-19-test-kits-to-wuhan-hospitals-1.4190697?mode=amp
What kind of shortages are you experiencing in the UK?  Is there any reason why that company isn't or hasn't (if that's the case) been able to sell their tests in the UK? 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 21, 2020, 09:19:32 AM
The importance of proper hand washing technique. This is a convincing 30 second video.

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1241177007305744384


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 21, 2020, 09:36:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 21, 2020, 08:39:38 AM
Correct. And in some states most of the cases diagnosed are ones which are so serious they need medical intervention. So it's impossible to draw any conclusions from the ratio of deaths to detected cases.

The mortality rate is demonstrably not very much higher than that of the seasonal flu. The problem is the very much higher rate of contagiousness which buckles the medical system to the brink of collapse. That's why social distancing and isolation is essential. We absolutely must buy time.

Stay home, folks, stay home!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 09:48:52 AM

      My niece is doing fine. She is a horsegirlcarthing, and she sent me a drawing of a Toyota Previa.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 10:57:57 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 09:48:52 AM
      My niece is doing fine. She is a horsegirlcarthing, and she sent me a drawing of a Toyota Previa.

     
Pardon, but what is a horsegirlcarthing?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 12:04:33 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 10:57:57 AM
Pardon, but what is a horsegirlcarthing?

     She would race tiny toy cars in the living room, then she partially transferred her allegiance to horses, but kept her car thing going. The Toyote Previa has been her spirit car since tinyhood, though other oddball cars play a role.

     (https://i.imgur.com/mkUdQuO.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 21, 2020, 12:48:11 PM
If the people of Netherlands need some convincing, show them the numbers from Italy. 793 deaths today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 12:55:34 PM
     This statement originating with the NSC was sent out by the State Dept for use as a talking point:

"Chinese Communist Party officials in Wuhan and Beijing had a special responsibility to inform the Chinese people and the world of the threat, since they were the first to learn of it," the cable reads. "Instead, the... government hid news of the virus from its own people for weeks, while suppressing information and punishing doctors and journalists who raised the alarm. The Party cared more about its reputation than its own people's suffering."

      This quote seems apt:

"You have sat here too long for any good you are doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 01:34:02 PM
     
     (https://i.imgur.com/HpyffCc.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:36:29 PM
I think the Corona virus situation is so bad in Italy and Spain because these are Catholic countries:

- Family is THE safety net in catholic cultures. Social distancing destroys that.
- Suicide is a sin in catholic cultures. Corona virus allows suicides to be labeled as Corona virus deaths.

I don't think if I am correct, but my brain came up with this theory.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 01:57:35 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:36:29 PM
I think the Corona virus situation is so bad in Italy and Spain because these are Catholic countries:

- Family is THE safety net in catholic cultures. Social distancing destroys that.
- Suicide is a sin in catholic cultures. Corona virus allows suicides to be labeled as Corona virus deaths.

I don't think if I am correct, but my brain came up with this theory.



     I don't know about Catholic but these are Latin countries, very social and perhaps a little late in reducing their tendency to clump together, eat, drink and be happy.

     I don't know what's going on with the Germans. It's getting on my nerves. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 02:16:44 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 12:04:33 PM
     She would race tiny toy cars in the living room, then she partially transferred her allegiance to horses, but kept her car thing going. The Toyote Previa has been her spirit car since tinyhood, though other oddball cars play a role.

     (https://i.imgur.com/mkUdQuO.jpg)
Ah, does she also want to live in something like this?: 
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5PMAOhVC-9Y/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 02:29:19 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 02:16:44 PM
Ah, does she also want to live in something like this?: 
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5PMAOhVC-9Y/maxresdefault.jpg)

     I think she wants to semi-live in a barn.

      (https://i.imgur.com/RO3Oekg.jpg)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 02:38:28 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 21, 2020, 02:29:19 PM
     I think she wants to semi-live in a barn.

      (https://i.imgur.com/RO3Oekg.jpg)

     
;D Horses are great; I can well understand her wanting to be around them.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 21, 2020, 03:57:56 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 21, 2020, 01:36:29 PM
I think the Corona virus situation is so bad in Italy and Spain because these are Catholic countries:

- Family is THE safety net in catholic cultures. Social distancing destroys that.
- Suicide is a sin in catholic cultures. Corona virus allows suicides to be labeled as Corona virus deaths.

I don't think if I am correct, but my brain came up with this theory.

What about Iran and China? What does your brain say ?

::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 21, 2020, 04:54:56 PM
Quote from: Rinaldo on March 21, 2020, 12:48:11 PM
If the people of Netherlands need some convincing, show them the numbers from Italy. 793 deaths today.

All those figures are well-known here.
Despite that: crowded beaches (for the 'regular' first beach walk in spring), forests and trains today. Hey, it's a sunny weekend, f*ck the virus, f*ck the consequences, let's pretend nothing serious is going on.

(https://talkudil.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/struisvogel.jpg)

Look at my face!
Does my face look bovvered?


:(

My prediction: if this utterly stubborn behaviour here continues, it won't take long until the Dutch government opts for a total lockdown, with huge fines for not obeying. Thanks to all those mindless believers in personal 'freedom'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 21, 2020, 05:29:26 PM
UK hotels to become homeless shelters under coronavirus plan (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/21/uk-hotels-homeless-shelters-coronavirus)


Cities struggle to protect vulnerable homeless populations as coronavirus spreads (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cities-struggle-to-protect-vulnerable-homeless-populations-as-coronavirus-spreads/2020/03/20/1144249c-67be-11ea-b5f1-a5a804158597_story.html)


California takes precautions to keep homeless population safe from the coronavirus (https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/poverty/488661-california-takes-precautions-to-keep-homeless-population)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 21, 2020, 06:41:45 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 21, 2020, 04:54:56 PM
All those figures are well-known here.
Despite that: crowded beaches (for the 'regular' first beach walk in spring), forests and trains today. Hey, it's a sunny weekend, f*ck the virus, f*ck the consequences, let's pretend nothing serious is going on.

(https://talkudil.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/struisvogel.jpg)

Look at my face!
Does my face look bovvered?


:(

My prediction: if this utterly stubborn behaviour here continues, it won't take long until the Dutch government opts for a total lockdown, with huge fines for not obeying. Thanks to all those mindless believers in personal 'freedom'.

Friday Belgium sealed its border with the Netherlands, and police turned away dutch tourists away after widely condemned 'rampages' in beaches, parks, stores, while locals were consigned to their homes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 21, 2020, 06:43:23 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 21, 2020, 05:34:28 AM
Nice to see that Babar is staying fit!

+1
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 21, 2020, 07:08:48 PM
Quote from: André on March 21, 2020, 06:41:45 PM
Friday Belgium sealed its border with the Netherlands, and police turned away dutch tourists away after widely condemned 'rampages' in beaches, parks, stores, while locals were consigned to their homes.

I debate denialists on another site. What strikes me is no matter how often you tell them it isn't just the death rate that is a worry they never pay attention. It never occurs to them to consider the consequences of 50 or 60% of the country being ill, often seriously ill, at the same time. With no medicine.

We cannot have a permanent lockdown like some US states are doing, but we cannot just let it rip either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 01:54:59 AM
Today's Sunday Times

(https://i.ibb.co/bBfKJ90/2-F7-FEA28-0-AFF-4167-808-C-861376352-B20.jpg)

Interesting article here

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 22, 2020, 02:16:16 AM
My granddaughter has it! We now believe mum and both children caught the virus through a trip to Disney Paris three weeks ago. Thankfully a sky-high temperature didn't last long and she is now on the mend. Mum thought she and baby boy had a heavy cold but speaking to 111 they had the virus. She is now free to mix as she pleases but her husband, my son, as the only one of the family not to succumb is on lock down although he feels absolutely fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 03:48:09 AM
This is worth watching

https://www.facebook.com/1309807577/videos/10222606298128711/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 04:08:08 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 22, 2020, 02:16:16 AM
My granddaughter has it! We now believe mum and both children caught the virus through a trip to Disney Paris three weeks ago. Thankfully a sky-high temperature didn't last long and she is now on the mend. Mum thought she and baby boy had a heavy cold but speaking to 111 they had the virus. She is now free to mix as she pleases but her husband, my son, as the only one of the family not to succumb is on lock down although he feels absolutely fine.
Oh, dear!  Glad to hear that everyone has recovered and hope that your son continues to be in good health.  Curious though:  how were they able to diagnose just over the phone?  Couldn't it have been something different?  Just a bit confused here....

Anyway, I wish all of you the best health!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 22, 2020, 04:22:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 01:54:59 AM
Today's Sunday Times

(https://i.ibb.co/bBfKJ90/2-F7-FEA28-0-AFF-4167-808-C-861376352-B20.jpg)

Interesting article here

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach

Not surprising....

The Dutch government has been accused of a similar strategy: letting the virus run its course in a "controlled" way until the threshold for group immunity has been reached.

What is actually done now in most countries is supressing the rate in which the virus spreads. When - and as long as - the transmission rate is below 1:1, the total number of cases goes down. If successful, this will happen before the threshold of group immunity is reached. Although the build up of immunity is a gradual process: any level below the threshold would still contribute in slowing down another outbreak or next wave.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spineur on March 22, 2020, 04:51:16 AM
Serbia national orchestra plays Bella Ciao in support for Italians, in an amazing synchronized video-call.  This is very touching, I find

https://www.youtube.com/v/L63f5DdzYNg
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 05:51:11 AM
Supermarkets give workers raises amid coronavirus pandemic (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/21/metro/stop-shop-gives-union-employees-raises-additional-sick-leave/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 06:00:28 AM
Quote from: André on March 21, 2020, 06:41:45 PM
Friday Belgium sealed its border with the Netherlands, and police turned away dutch tourists away after widely condemned 'rampages' in beaches, parks, stores, while locals were consigned to their homes.
I'm curious as to where you read about 'rampages as I hadn't seen any stories about that?

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 06:02:05 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 22, 2020, 05:51:11 AM
Supermarkets give workers raises amid coronavirus pandemic (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/21/metro/stop-shop-gives-union-employees-raises-additional-sick-leave/)
I did hear that over the news too.   :)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on March 22, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
I'm really confused about what's going on here in Japan. We were hit early with a few cases as there are usually many Chinese tourists here. The schools have been closed since February and attractions are also closed. The government seems to think Japan has been spared and is talking about letting schools reopen (at their usual time as this has been an extended spring break or, actually, a spring break that started early). As a country, the the numbers are not like Italy or Spain. However, testing is fairly low, from what I understand, and the Osaka area, where I live, has seen a small spike. Experts have been asking the question of why Japan hasn't been hit harder. The answer is either a mishmash of conjecture or that Japan is about to see a second devastating wave. Meanwhile it looks like my job, university, is on hold until perhaps May. I really didn't take things seriously early on and now I'm panicking a little. I see many people out and about acting normally, even though schools and amusements are closed. For example, the playgrounds are quite crowded with kids (and I took my kid a few times I'm ashamed to admit). I'm worried that many of us here in Japan didn't take this seriously enough. I guess lots of people are in the same boat but how are we all going to survive financially? I'm less worried about getting sick than economies and societies collapsing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 22, 2020, 07:18:16 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 06:00:28 AM
I'm curious as to where you read about 'rampages as I hadn't seen any stories about that?

Best wishes,

PD

RTBF tv news among others, as well as a few press articles.


https://www.7sur7.be/belgique/la-police-a-renvoye-700-neerlandais-qui-ont-passe-la-frontiere-avec-le-limbourg~addd41ff/?referrer=https://www.google.ca/ (https://www.7sur7.be/belgique/la-police-a-renvoye-700-neerlandais-qui-ont-passe-la-frontiere-avec-le-limbourg~addd41ff/?referrer=https://www.google.ca/)

https://www.lesoir.be/288656/article/2020-03-19/coronavirus-le-bourgmestre-de-stavelot-fustige-lattitude-des-touristes (https://www.lesoir.be/288656/article/2020-03-19/coronavirus-le-bourgmestre-de-stavelot-fustige-lattitude-des-touristes)

https://plus.lesoir.be/288948/article/2020-03-20/coronavirus-la-fermeture-des-frontieres-belges-renvoie-les-neerlandais-chez-eux (https://plus.lesoir.be/288948/article/2020-03-20/coronavirus-la-fermeture-des-frontieres-belges-renvoie-les-neerlandais-chez-eux)

https://www.rtbf.be/info/regions/liege/detail_stavelot-des-touristes-neerlandais-irresponsables?id=10462982 (https://www.rtbf.be/info/regions/liege/detail_stavelot-des-touristes-neerlandais-irresponsables?id=10462982)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 07:19:42 AM
     I'm paying attention to confirmed v. active cases. China and S. Korea are seeing a drop in active cases. In countries with rising active case totals, almost all counties, even with expanded testing there is a noticeable slowing of the rate of growth in some counties hit hard early. Is this "herd semi-immunity"?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 07:20:57 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 06:02:05 AM
I did hear that over the news too.   :)

Best wishes,

PD

Good news, as these folks find themselves willy-nilly basically on the front lines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 22, 2020, 07:21:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 01:54:59 AM
Today's Sunday Times

(https://i.ibb.co/bBfKJ90/2-F7-FEA28-0-AFF-4167-808-C-861376352-B20.jpg)

Interesting article here

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach

I fear he is right, and that might actually be the best approach. It was not a good plan to follow, because it bet the farm on several unproven assumptions and was far too risky. I am glad they changed course. But that doesn't mean it couldn't turn out to have been right.

Several cases in town here. Including one MacDonald's worker, which is worrying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 07:24:58 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 22, 2020, 07:21:47 AM
I fear he is right, and that might actually be the best approach. It was not a good plan to follow, because it bet the farm on several unproven assumptions and was far too risky. I am glad they changed course. But that doesn't mean it couldn't turn out to have been right.

Several cases in town here. Including one MacDonald's worker, which is worrying.

Gotta break some eggs to make an omelette isn't really a good look, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 22, 2020, 07:25:23 AM
https://www.hln.be/video/hoogstraten-sluit-nederlandse-sluipwegen-af-met-containers~p136410

Belgian police controls and barricades the Belgo-Dutch border short cuts / Antwerp province. The main roads stay open.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 22, 2020, 07:28:33 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 22, 2020, 07:24:58 AM
Gotta break some eggs to make an omelette isn't really a good look, though.
No. I was impressed by Johnson's bottle, to use a Brit word, in putting the plan forward, and I was impressed by how well thought out it was by his science advisors. But I was also appalled. What if we can find a way to reduce the area under the curve after all? Then the plan has possibly killed hundreds of thousands. And it relied on several other unproven assumptions too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 22, 2020, 07:31:23 AM
Quote from: Que on March 22, 2020, 04:22:13 AM
Not surprising....

The Dutch government has been accused of a similar strategy: letting the virus run its course in a "controlled" way until the threshold for group immunity has been reached.

What is actually done now in most countries is supressing the rate in which the virus spreads. When - and as long as - the transmission rate is below 1:1, the total number of cases goes down. If successful, this will happen before the threshold of group immunity is reached. Although the build up of immunity is a gradual process: any level below the threshold would still contribute in slowing down another outbreak or next wave.

Q

I can see the idea behind the herd (semi-) immunity thought. But the way things are developing now, with the neglecting behaviour of far too many Dutch citizens, I guess that we are going to switch to the suppressing variant, too.
Read today about a police officer in Leiden, who was warning a group of teenagers who were grouping together in a park, playing football, sitting closely next to each other and such. These youngsters told him that they don't get their 'reliable' Corona information from the government and Health Organisations websites, but from different internet sources. And apparently their 'reliable' sources tell them completely different 'truths'. According the the police officer, these kids did not have a clue about what was going on. "Can't we play football anymore?"
I guess this also goes for many of their parents. It was crowded again this afternoon on the Scheveningen boulevard. Even boxing clinics were given on the beach.

And it's not just the young by the way. Yesterday, in the super market, it was mainly the elderly people who grouped together to discuss the sitation. They made no effort at all to keep at distance from each other and from other people. I shook my head a little and one grey showed me a grin, I have no idea why. Maybe he wanted to say: hey dude, we are going to die soon any way?

Well, as the Dutch themselves use to say: schiet mij maar lek.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 07:42:13 AM

     Herd immunity is a natural consequence you don't need a strategy to implement. The herd, or what's left of it, will be immune unless a dramatic new way of treating the virus short circuits the process until we get a vaccine.

     Immunity and suppression should work together. Both will buy time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 22, 2020, 08:14:00 AM
Quote from: milk on March 22, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
I'm really confused about what's going on here in Japan. We were hit early with a few cases as there are usually many Chinese tourists here
At least I'm not the only one who noticed how many Chinese tourists there are.  :D

I don't see the data on Japan, but Korea has somewhat flattened the curve already, so probably Japan has as well. Quite an impressively low death count- especially considering the old population. I'm a bit confused on this also. Seems like it couldn't be accurate.


Quote from: milk on March 22, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
I'm less worried about getting sick than economies and societies collapsing.
Same here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 22, 2020, 08:28:52 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 07:42:13 AM
     Herd immunity is a natural consequence you don't need a strategy to implement. The herd, or what's left of it, will be immune unless a dramatic new way of treating the virus short circuits the process until we get a vaccine.

     Immunity and suppression should work together. Both will buy time.

Yeah, of course. Herd immunity is a natural process, not a strategy. But if we let it just go like that, then the pressure on medicare and society gets far too high. The death toll is gonna be very high. I guess that's not what we want. In the 'modern and civilized country' that I live in, there is already a shortage of Intensive Care chambers and beds in hospitals in the south. So governments and health institutions have to come up with a strategy. As Que said, a total lockdown might flatten and lower the curve before the herd immunity is 'spread'. And things might start all over again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 08:43:07 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 22, 2020, 08:28:52 AM
Yeah, of course. Herd immunity is a natural process, not a strategy. But if we let it just go like that, then the pressure on medicare and society gets far too high.

     That's how I see it. If you can arrange for deaths to occur later, there will be fewer deaths. Also, herd immunity is a matter of degree, so there are more and more people who got the virus, never developed symptoms and are no longer spreading it. The virus slows as it hits more individual firebreaks that were never tested. We don't know about them, there's no way of counting them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 09:12:07 AM
Emboldened wild animals venture into locked-down cities worldwide
Deer, raccoons, turkeys and other creatures have made their way into urban settings they might normally avoid (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/22/animals-cities-coronavirus-lockdowns-deer-raccoons)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 09:31:17 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 09:12:07 AM
Emboldened wild animals venture into locked-down cities worldwide
Deer, raccoons, turkeys and other creatures have made their way into urban settings they might normally avoid (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/22/animals-cities-coronavirus-lockdowns-deer-raccoons)

"Let the jungle in!"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 10:23:24 AM
Quote from: milk on March 22, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
I guess lots of people are in the same boat but how are we all going to survive financially? I'm less worried about getting sick than economies and societies collapsing.

Yes, and in all fairness to the British government, they appear to be trying to deal with this.

You can't ask people to isolate themselves unless you give them the means to do so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 11:03:57 AM
     A region in Japan launched its own coronavirus fight. It's now called a 'model' in local action. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/japan-coronavirus-wakayama/2020/03/22/02da83bc-65f5-11ea-8a8e-5c5336b32760_story.html)

Japanese bureaucrats are famous for following the rules. But Japan's southwestern region of Kansai is a little bit different, a place where people take pride in their independence. Wakayama prefecture has an independent politician in the governor's office, Yoshinobu Nisaka, who said he doesn't follow government guidelines and prefers to take an "original approach."

     I don't care how failing or lamestream the tentpole news media are. I don't play that game. I want the news, so I go where news is, where standards are high and today confirms what I read the day before and on and on until the News Heat Death.

     What happened in Wakayama prefecture is a part of the story in Japan. Now I know a little about it. I read it in the WaPo.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 22, 2020, 11:38:17 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 22, 2020, 02:16:16 AM
My granddaughter has it! We now believe mum and both children caught the virus through a trip to Disney Paris three weeks ago. Thankfully a sky-high temperature didn't last long and she is now on the mend. Mum thought she and baby boy had a heavy cold but speaking to 111 they had the virus. She is now free to mix as she pleases but her husband, my son, as the only one of the family not to succumb is on lock down although he feels absolutely fine.
Hope it all works out well Lol.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on March 22, 2020, 11:46:12 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 22, 2020, 10:23:24 AM
Yes, and in all fairness to the British government, they appear to be trying to deal with this.

You can't ask people to isolate themselves unless you give them the means to do so.

I agree with this. I think Rishi Sunak has broadly responded well to the maelstrom. However as a self employed person, I am in a category he seems to have left out of any plans for support. As my income abruptly dried up last week, I am hoping that I can either find a way round the impasse, or that or I can last until the situation eases, the latter being rather fanciful.

While Sunak seems to have responded strongly (except for me and others like me), Boris Johnson is looking somewhat dazed in the headlights and sounding as if for the first time he's just realising the job is not all about him. I do hope he ups his game because it would help everybody. As I said earlier I think a big part of the battle is going to be psychological, and I think he could play a positive part in that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 22, 2020, 12:11:18 PM

Chancellor Angela Merkel in self-isolation. she received a vaccine (not for Covid-19) from a doctor who tested positive 2 days later.

Senator Rand Paul (USA) and singer Placido Domingo tested positive for Covid-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 01:57:57 PM
         
     (https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1241374007066349573/CILeNhjk?format=jpg&name=600x314)

     Before Angela went into isolation, she went shopping, observing protocol by staying away from other shoppers. Ausgezeichnet! (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 02:26:57 PM
Quote from: André on March 22, 2020, 12:11:18 PM
Chancellor Angela Merkel in self-isolation. she received a vaccine (not for Covid-19) from a doctor who tested positive 2 days later.

Senator Rand Paul (USA) and singer Placido Domingo tested positive for Covid-19.

Is that the same Rand Paul who recently stalled passing of an economic rescue package by trying to attach nonsense amendments to it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 02:26:57 PM
Is that the same Rand Paul who recently stalled passing of an economic rescue package by trying to attach nonsense amendments to it?

The very same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 05:53:57 PM
Our PM just announced we've got 48 hours to prepare for a 4-week full lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2020, 06:48:46 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 22, 2020, 05:53:57 PM
Our PM just announced we've got 48 hours to prepare for a 4-week full lockdown.

Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 22, 2020, 10:38:23 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 07:42:13 AM
     Herd immunity is a natural consequence you don't need a strategy to implement. The herd, or what's left of it, will be immune unless a dramatic new way of treating the virus short circuits the process until we get a vaccine.

     Immunity and suppression should work together. Both will buy time.

Yes, but the term "herd immunity" is usually used to refer to vaccine conferred immunity (possibly in combination with some natural immunity).

The disease has a characteristic time coarse. You are infected, after maybe 5 days you exhibit mild symptoms, after 10 days, maybe still mild, maybe you feel so bad you can't get out of bed. By 14-21 days there's a 1-2% chance you're dead, otherwise you're probably recovering. If you're still alive at 30 days you are probably immune to reinfection. If exposed again you won't get sick and spread if further. Probably you are contagious after 3 days, until you recover. I gather that during the time people are walking around, not knowing how sick they are, they infect another 3 or 4 people.

If you do really strong isolation as the Chinese seem to have done you can reach a point where a sick person is unlikely to give the disease to anyone else. People are restricted to their homes, the economy is just turned off and some army unit delivers a package of rations to you once a week. Maybe a person only has a 10% chance of giving the disease to someone and week by week infections go from 100,000, to 10,000, 1,000, 100, 10, 1. At that point the disease is extinguished, but most people have never had the virus and there is no general immunity. It can roar back, but at least you know what you are facing and are in a situation where you can trace every new infection one by one and stop it. Then they can turn the economy back on.

In the U.S. it seems like no one is imagining that level of control. The social distancing, shelter-at-home orders probably will only reduce transmission to a moderate degree. Maybe an infected person is, on average, giving it to 1.5 other people in the course of their illness instead of 3 or 4. The disease still grows exponentially, but slower. The health care system is not completely overwhelmed. In the end, essentially everyone has gotten the disease and has either died or acquired immunity. But you haven't saved the entire population from taking that 1-2% chance of dying. Maybe the best result is you slow it down enough that a vaccine is found before the epidemic runs its course. But the epidemic happens in slow motion and the economy is shuttered for a longer time. Deciding how strong an intervention is ideal is not a simple problem.

The desirable form of herd immunity is when you get it from a vaccine, without taking the risk of dying of the disease in order to get immunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 23, 2020, 12:11:08 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 22, 2020, 09:31:17 AM
"Let the jungle in!"

Rather not, I'd say. Animals should not eat junk food, let alone plastic...

https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/belgium-all-news/science/97811/research-urban-junk-food-diet-is-bad-for-city-birds-microbiota-fibre-gut-bacteria-intestinal-flora/

During a visit to Indonesia (at least 20 years ago) I already saw deer, apes and raccoon like animals scavenge dustbins and plastic garbage bags...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 23, 2020, 12:17:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 04:08:08 AM
Oh, dear!  Glad to hear that everyone has recovered and hope that your son continues to be in good health.  Curious though:  how were they able to diagnose just over the phone?  Couldn't it have been something different?  Just a bit confused here....

Anyway, I wish all of you the best health!

PD

Not as confused as me, P. The mum had no idea she had the virus until phoning 111. Their instructions are clear she, with baby, can go out. My granddaughter is quarantined for one week, my son for two. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 23, 2020, 12:19:46 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 22, 2020, 04:08:08 AM
Oh, dear!  Glad to hear that everyone has recovered and hope that your son continues to be in good health.  Curious though:  how were they able to diagnose just over the phone?  Couldn't it have been something different?  Just a bit confused here....

Anyway, I wish all of you the best health!

PD

From me too Lol.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 23, 2020, 12:21:43 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 21, 2020, 09:11:19 AM
I do not think it naive, Jeffrey. Working from home, when possible, needed a trigger this is a thunderbolt! Why would companies pay millions for offices in the capitals of the world when they can perform just as effectively with modern communications without? As you say, this would result in less pollution and stress.
I count myself a part of the lucky generation - missed the war, swinging sixties, cheap mortgages and excellent healthcare. Our kids have it much harder. So time for us to get through this, in one piece hopefully.
Thanks Lol.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 23, 2020, 12:25:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 22, 2020, 11:38:17 AM
Hope it all works out well Lol.

Thanks, Jeffrey. Watching my son closely - from afar - he is sharing accommodation with three people who had the virus. He even slept with his daughter while she had a raging temperature! He feels fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 23, 2020, 12:37:58 AM
Quote from: milk on March 22, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
I'm really confused about what's going on here in Japan. We were hit early with a few cases as there are usually many Chinese tourists here. The schools have been closed since February and attractions are also closed. The government seems to think Japan has been spared and is talking about letting schools reopen (at their usual time as this has been an extended spring break or, actually, a spring break that started early). As a country, the the numbers are not like Italy or Spain. However, testing is fairly low, from what I understand, and the Osaka area, where I live, has seen a small spike. Experts have been asking the question of why Japan hasn't been hit harder. The answer is either a mishmash of conjecture or that Japan is about to see a second devastating wave. Meanwhile it looks like my job, university, is on hold until perhaps May. I really didn't take things seriously early on and now I'm panicking a little. I see many people out and about acting normally, even though schools and amusements are closed. For example, the playgrounds are quite crowded with kids (and I took my kid a few times I'm ashamed to admit). I'm worried that many of us here in Japan didn't take this seriously enough. I guess lots of people are in the same boat but how are we all going to survive financially? I'm less worried about getting sick than economies and societies collapsing.

It is crazy that the Japanese Government and IOC still plan for the Olympics to go ahead. Shocking to see the mass of people (55,000) in an enclosed place at Sendai for a glimpse of the Olympic flame.

 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 12:50:27 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 22, 2020, 10:38:23 PM
Yes,



No one knows what sort of immunity the virus confers - how strongly it protects against immediate reinfection and how long it lasts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 23, 2020, 12:51:49 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 22, 2020, 08:43:07 AM
     That's how I see it. If you can arrange for deaths to occur later, there will be fewer deaths. Also, herd immunity is a matter of degree, so there are more and more people who got the virus, never developed symptoms and are no longer spreading it. The virus slows as it hits more individual firebreaks that were never tested. We don't know about them, there's no way of counting them.

In the Netherlands they are starting a program to test the blood of all blood donors (which are unpaid volunteers) for antibodies, so as to be able to estimate the spread of the virus in the general population

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 12:52:55 AM
Is there anyone posting here who lives in an African country? Or has regular contact? I fear that Africa is about to get it in the neck.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 23, 2020, 01:01:07 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 23, 2020, 12:25:21 AM
Thanks, Jeffrey. Watching my son closely - from afar - he is sharing accommodation with three people who had the virus. He even slept with his daughter while she had a raging temperature! He feels fine.

Best of luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 01:13:43 AM
Here's a present for the more mathematically inclined people here

http://gabgoh.github.io/COVID/index.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 23, 2020, 05:41:35 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 23, 2020, 12:11:08 AM
Rather not, I'd say. Animals should not eat junk food, let alone plastic...

https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/belgium-all-news/science/97811/research-urban-junk-food-diet-is-bad-for-city-birds-microbiota-fibre-gut-bacteria-intestinal-flora/

During a visit to Indonesia (at least 20 years ago) I already saw deer, apes and raccoon like animals scavenge dustbins and plastic garbage bags...

That's an interesting article but I am not going to open up a can of worms by suggesting this could have the slightest relevance to humans :-X.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 23, 2020, 06:57:23 AM

     By monitoring active rather than total cases you can get a handle on the overall shape and trajectory of the pandemic. Italy is slowing. France is seeing a very slight decline. Assuming ongoing expansion of testing this is significant. Turkey, Brazil and Portugal are growing fast. The US is not among the fastest but towards the higher end of the range. Active cases continue to drop in China and S. Korea.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 23, 2020, 07:05:09 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 23, 2020, 12:11:08 AM
Rather not, I'd say. Animals should not eat junk food, let alone plastic...

https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/belgium-all-news/science/97811/research-urban-junk-food-diet-is-bad-for-city-birds-microbiota-fibre-gut-bacteria-intestinal-flora/

During a visit to Indonesia (at least 20 years ago) I already saw deer, apes and raccoon like animals scavenge dustbins and plastic garbage bags...

Aye, it just made me think of Kipling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 23, 2020, 07:09:16 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 12:50:27 AM
No one knows what sort of immunity the virus confers - how strongly it protects against immediate reinfection and how long it lasts.

You are right of course, the level of immunity is unknown, although it seems to me there must be strong immunity on the very short term. If your body had freed itself from the virus or its effects you must be immune at that moment, since a newly introduced virus infection will be suppressed along side the resident infection. The question is whether that lasts a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 23, 2020, 07:12:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 01:13:43 AM
Here's a present for the more mathematically inclined people here

http://gabgoh.github.io/COVID/index.html

Very interesting, thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 23, 2020, 07:13:16 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 23, 2020, 07:05:09 AM
Aye, it just made me think of Kipling.

Me too.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 23, 2020, 07:24:37 AM
Flying Dutchman time
https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/cruise-ship-passengers-stranded-coronavirus/index.html

Refusing to let them disembark is a bit irrational.  If they have been at sea this long with no cased of COVID19, they may the only group of people who can be guaranteed not to have it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 23, 2020, 07:40:21 AM
It's my daughter's birthday but we didn't meet up and communicated by Skype instead. She was having a 'virtual breakfast' with her friend who was born on the same day as she was. Her flat mates (now recovered from corona virus-type symptoms) are cooking for her tonight. I sent her presents in the post and we put some money into her account.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 23, 2020, 07:51:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 23, 2020, 01:01:07 AM
Best of luck!

Cheers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 23, 2020, 08:01:41 AM
New York's governor said Sunday that he was exasperated that people are still ignoring his social distancing orders, saying he spent part of the previous day watching people clustering in groups and acting like it was just another nice spring day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 08:08:48 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 23, 2020, 07:09:16 AM
You are right of course, the level of immunity is unknown, although it seems to me there must be strong immunity on the very short term. If your body had freed itself from the virus or its effects you must be immune at that moment, since a newly introduced virus infection will be suppressed along side the resident infection. The question is whether that lasts a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.

The best analog we have are other Corona viruses. They confer immunity which certainly lasts months. One study showed good immune response a year later BUT undetectable levels of antibodies. So that is ambiguous. Probably booster vaccinations will be needed if that pattern holds for covid 19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 23, 2020, 08:11:24 AM
Broward County*, where I live, is now officially on "only essential services" type of lockdown.  Although the list of exempted services is not exactly essential stuff (car dealerships, lawn maintenance, etc...outdoor work, businesses not directly dealing with the public,  building projects that are currently being worked on seem to be the rationales).  Local stats here: https://wsvn.com/news/local/latest-numbers-1171-covid-19-cases-in-florida-over-500-in-south-florida-alone/

So I am home for work for two weeks (at least), with guaranteed pay for the first week (but my hours were reduced, so that is not as great as it might sound),  decision not yet made about the second week's pay, beyond that completely up in the air.

*For nonFloridians, that's Fort Lauderdale and environs, about 2 million people. We are (per Wikipedia) the 17th most populous county in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 08:22:54 AM
Car maintenance is pretty important actually, and can mostly be done with good social distancing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 23, 2020, 08:28:57 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 08:22:54 AM
Car maintenance is pretty important actually, and can mostly be done with good social distancing.

I assumed that, although the exemption seems to include the car sales side.

I probably will avail myself of that. My car is approaching a regular maintenance checkup, and I just got a notice from Toyota about an airbag related recall. Apparently the signal mechanism that would release the air bag in case of accident is not working, so the airbag might not deploy. IOW, the opposite of last year's problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 23, 2020, 08:52:32 AM
     Washington has the lowest rate of change for confirmed cases among all states with 100 or more cases. Missouri has the highest, their total doubled in a single day. There are aspects of curve flattening that are semi-autonomous in that people will behave differently as they see the threat approach them. It's not all what the authorities recommend or enforce. Missouri is the kind of place you would expect to 1) get the virus late and 2) react slowly to information about spread in the hot zones. I expect this gap will close pretty soon.

     "Confirmed" cases is not as useful as "active" cases. A country can have a huge confirmed total while the active total rate of change is dropping.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 23, 2020, 09:15:19 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 08:08:48 AM
The best analog we have are other Corona viruses. They confer immunity which certainly lasts months. One study showed good immune response a year later BUT undetectable levels of antibodies. So that is ambiguous. Probably booster vaccinations will be needed if that pattern holds for covid 19.

Presumably long term immunity would be related to "memory" T cells.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 23, 2020, 09:53:56 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/m0qRSzS/Capture.png)


This is the UK system for dealing with critical cases. What pleases me is that the patient's wishes about "ceiling treatment" are taken into account right from the start. Maybe that's obvious if you're a medic but to me it's a relief -- if I develop ARDS I'm not sure I want that treatment, with its risk of some very difficult long term side effects if successful, and great indignity and suffering ending in death if not successful. I may prefer to end my life without the fight. Somewhere deep inside I thought I was strange for thinking like that.  Seeing refusal as a fairly explicit possibility in the NICE process reassures me that I'm not alone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:15:09 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 23, 2020, 07:40:21 AM
It's my daughter's birthday but we didn't meet up and communicated by Skype instead. She was having a 'virtual breakfast' with her friend who was born on the same day as she was. Her flat mates (now recovered from corona virus-type symptoms) are cooking for her tonight. I sent her presents in the post and we put some money into her account.
I'm relieved to hear that things worked out o.k.; I hadn't realized though that her flat mates maybe had it.  Did your daughter self-quarantine when they weren't feeling well?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:19:21 AM
Speaking of the Olympics:  Canada has now announced that it won't be sending any of its athletes to the games.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 23, 2020, 10:21:07 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/I0472oz.jpg)

So.. death panels?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 10:29:46 AM
I don't want to give medical advice but my medical school professor brother in law tells me almost all white people in the northern hemisphere in winter are vitamin D deficient and should supplement. He prescribes a supplement to every patient, and this is in line with the national guidelines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 23, 2020, 10:32:16 AM
Parking garage, Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee:

(https://i.postimg.cc/QM3TLrYy/ETm-Ggo9-Xs-AEMbze.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:35:29 AM
Wow!  That's being proactive!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:37:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:19:21 AM
Speaking of the Olympics:  Canada has now announced that it won't be sending any of its athletes to the games.

EDIT:  Australia now too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 23, 2020, 10:44:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:19:21 AM
Speaking of the Olympics:  Canada has now announced that it won't be sending any of its athletes to the games.

PD
They've now been postponed...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:53:27 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 23, 2020, 10:44:38 AM
They've now been postponed...
Not surprised to hear this...still sad though.

I wonder whether or not Federer will still be playing tennis then and wanting to compete for Switzerland when they do next hold it?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 23, 2020, 11:22:55 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 10:15:09 AM
I'm relieved to hear that things worked out o.k.; I hadn't realized though that her flat mates maybe had it.  Did your daughter self-quarantine when they weren't feeling well?

PD
Thanks PD.
Yes, she did.
She works from home anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 23, 2020, 11:52:42 AM

     Massachusetts is tightening restrictions. Governor of the Universe Charlie Baker is on the case. At Trader Joe's today we had to wait in line to get in and use hand wipes.

     We bag our own groceries with our own bags. The main thing is we got our tamales and refried beans, crucial for survival. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 23, 2020, 12:03:41 PM
Does your mail have to be quarantined? (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/23/nation/does-your-mail-have-be-quarantined/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 12:07:36 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 10:29:46 AM
I don't want to give medical advice but my medical school professor brother in law tells me almost all white people in the northern hemisphere in winter are vitamin D deficient and should supplement. He prescribes a supplement to every patient, and this is in line with the national guidelines.
What kind of amounts does he suggest?  Any idea?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 12:14:17 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 12:07:36 PM
What kind of amounts does he suggest?  Any idea?
Any pill form. Some multivitamins have D but not all have the full RDA. D pills are cheap at the drug store.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 23, 2020, 12:29:07 PM
Oscal and some other calcium supplements include Vitamin D.

IIRC the basic non-pill recommendation is to sit in the sunshine for 15 minutes.  But that has to balanced against the risk for skin cancer.

https://www.yalemedicine.org/stories/vitamin-d-myths-debunked/

And

https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/vitamin-d-and-your-health-breaking-old-rules-raising-new-hopes
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 23, 2020, 12:35:54 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 23, 2020, 10:29:46 AM
I don't want to give medical advice but my medical school professor brother in law tells me almost all white people in the northern hemisphere in winter are vitamin D deficient and should supplement. He prescribes a supplement to every patient, and this is in line with the national guidelines.

Thanks for the advice.  You know you are already isolated indoors when a lockdown during a pandemic seems like only a minor deviation from your usual routine.  I do have some canned tuna, which apparently does have vitamin D in it.






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 01:12:38 PM
My ("stupidly-expensive multivitamin"--a term borrowed from one of my doctors!) has above the recommended amount, but is low in calcium...thankfully, I like my dairy, greens, and sometimes eat nuts (should go back to snacking on things like almonds).  I am trying to get outside more during the wintertime...found a place that I like to walk/hike (and when doing REALLY well...jog along).  Am trying my best not to get too close to others whilst on the trail (or take one of the alternate mini-trails).

JBS and all, thank you for the links and suggestions.

And, Dave, you (unless there is some medical reason) really need to get outside more!  It'll cheer you up....fresh air, some sunshine...plants, birds...all good.   :)  Just mind the people.

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 23, 2020, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 23, 2020, 12:03:41 PM
Does your mail have to be quarantined? (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/23/nation/does-your-mail-have-be-quarantined/)
The only comment on that article is great.

"What about the Boston Globe paper? I think that would hold the virus for a while."

  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 23, 2020, 02:10:23 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 23, 2020, 12:03:41 PM
Does your mail have to be quarantined? (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/23/nation/does-your-mail-have-be-quarantined/)

I guess if you mail-order some Corona Beer...  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 23, 2020, 02:11:46 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 01:12:38 PM
And, Dave, you (unless there is some medical reason) really need to get outside more!  It'll cheer you up....fresh air, some sunshine...plants, birds...all good.   :)  Just mind the people.

Best,

PD

Thanks PD.  The funny thing is that the line about  "You know you're already isolated..." was from my nephew, who is a lot more outgoing than me. 

Yeah, the only thing to avoid outside are those... people...

There's also a bit of sun on the edge of my balcony if I get out there about now...

 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 02:15:55 PM
Quote from: greg on March 23, 2020, 01:53:14 PM
The only comment on that article is great.

"What about the Boston Globe paper? I think that would hold the virus for a while."

  :D

I know, hard to believe what is true these days....too much info and too much of it conflicting!  Personally, that would be the least of my concerns (getting it from my mail).  My thoughts personally:  wash your hands often and well and try your best not to touch your eyes, nose, and mouths...mind your local laws, be polite when shopping for supplies, and try to remember to do your best to keep your distances from other folks but it's o.k (and I think good) to be kind and friendly to others (helps to lower everybody's stress).

And be nice to your letter carrier.   ;) :)

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 23, 2020, 02:20:35 PM
     
     Could Blood from Coronavirus Victims Help the Sick? (https://www.thedailybeast.com/could-blood-from-coronavirus-victims-help-the-covid-19-sick?ref=home)

As Casadevall pointed out in his Wall Street Journal piece, one of the earliest uses of convalescent plasma involved a school physician in the 1930s using blood serum from those who had recovered from measles on dozens of schoolchildren, only three of whom later developed mild cases of the disease.

More recently—and more relevant to the current outbreak—doctors also used passive antibody therapy during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or SARS epidemic. In a very small study, doctors in Taiwan treated three patients suffering from severe cases of SARS—a virus from the same family as COVID-19—with convalescent plasma from the recovered and found that all three, who had failed to respond to previous treatments, survived.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 23, 2020, 02:20:41 PM
Quote from: Daverz on March 23, 2020, 02:11:46 PM
Thanks PD.  The funny thing is that the line about  "You know you're already isolated..." was from my nephew, who is a lot more outgoing than me. 

Yeah, the only thing to avoid outside are those... people...

There's also a bit of sun on the edge of my balcony if I get out there about now...


Balcony sounds nice!  And it's a good start too.   ;)  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 23, 2020, 02:27:58 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 23, 2020, 02:10:23 PM
I guess if you mail-order some Corona Beer...  :P

Just got my snail mail and made sure I did the 20 second hand wash afterward...

I also got a DoorDash delivery of beer from a local brewery earlier (Karl Strauss; delicious).  It's really hard to get Amazon Fresh deliveries right now (hint: have your cart ready to go and check out at midnight), Instacart is impossible, but DoorDash seems fairly easy, probably because it's so expensive.

Interesting that beer is the only thing that never seems to go out of stock.  Probably because we are awash in grain and malt from American agriculture.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 23, 2020, 05:27:45 PM
If you are from the New York area, don't plan on being welcomed to Florida
https://wsvn.com/news/local/gov-desantis-orders-new-york-area-travelers-to-quarantine/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 24, 2020, 01:36:39 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/older-people-would-rather-die-than-let-covid-19-lockdown-harm-us-economy-texas-official-dan-patrick

Quote
" Older people would rather die than let Covid-19 harm US economy – Texas official
Lieutenant governor Dan Patrick tells Fox News: 'Do we have to shut down the entire country for this? I think we can get back to work'

Patrick, a Texas Republican, praised the president's focus on the economy on Monday and said that it had "lifted" his heart.

"I don't want the whole country to be sacrificed," Patrick said. "I've talked to hundreds of people ... and everyone says pretty much the same thing: We can't lose our whole country. We're having an economic collapse."

"We're going to be in a total collapse, recession, depression, collapse in our society if this goes on for another several months," Patrick said. "As the president said, the mortality rate is so low. Do we have to shut down the entire country for this? I think we can get back to work."

Patrick said that, as someone who turns 70 next week, he was in the high-risk group, but that he was willing to give up his life for his six grandchildren.

"Look, I'm going to do everything I can do to live," Patrick said. "But if you said, are you willing to take a chance ... If I get sick, I'll go and try to get better, but if I don't, I don't."
"


When I was a graduate student I knew people who were working on Public Service Strategy, Politics and International Relations who would have models to quantify financially the value of a life, and I guess where you have to make these huge decisions, that's what's needed. How else are you to decide what to do rationally?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 24, 2020, 01:37:49 AM
In the Netherlands additional measures were announced, mainly to prevent people from congregating. Though people are still not locked up in their homes like in Spain or Italy.

The most significant and element however, was that the duration of all measures was extended to the 1st of June.
Two more month of this, is going to be though on individual people and on the economy.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 24, 2020, 01:41:15 AM
Oh for fuck's sake, I can't think about this, I'm going to listen to a Haydn piano trio.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 24, 2020, 02:18:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 24, 2020, 01:41:15 AM
Oh for fuck's sake, I can't think about this, I'm going to listen to a Haydn piano trio.

Excellent idea.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on March 24, 2020, 02:49:36 AM
Summary of the article:
Strong coronavirus measures today should only last a few weeks, there shouldn't be a big peak of infections afterwards, and it can all be done for a reasonable cost to society, saving millions of lives along the way. If we don't take these measures, tens of millions will be infected, many will die, along with anybody else that requires intensive care, because the healthcare system will have collapsed.
https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56 (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56)
I'm worried about where I am: Japan. If Japan escapes disaster, it will be seen as an outlier and a "miracle case." I hope so but I'm very skeptical. Yes Japanese wear masks routinely. Yes they don't shake hands. Yes they closed schools and attractions. But there's been no social distancing here, no playground or restaurant or shopping mall closures. People are going to work and have been all along  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 24, 2020, 03:30:02 AM
Quote from: milk on March 24, 2020, 02:49:36 AM
Summary of the article:
Strong coronavirus measures today should only last a few weeks, there shouldn't be a big peak of infections afterwards, and it can all be done for a reasonable cost to society, saving millions of lives along the way. If we don't take these measures, tens of millions will be infected, many will die, along with anybody else that requires intensive care, because the healthcare system will have collapsed.

https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56 (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56)


A very interesting analysis! I read through the entire thing.

It does make me very, very worried about developing (underdeveloped) countries: with their weak governments, overpopulated slums, and weak health care systems, it would for them be a enormous challenge to supress the outbreak of the virus and nearly impossible to contain it afterwards....

Like any crisis, this will hit the weakest the hardest.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 24, 2020, 03:42:08 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 02:42:02 AM
Re: vitamins etc - this was advice from a doctor friend.

If you can find it, he recommended, Quinine, usually to be found in combination with bioperine, astralgus root, vitamin C, echinacea purpurea and zinc.

If you can't find it (like me!) Vitamin D and C together should be helpful. You need a good quality (Solgar) Vitamin D tablet (1450 mg) and a high dosage (Solgar) Vitamin C tablet (1000mg). Take them for three days after a meal (one capsule of each). Your body will then have more resistance against the virus. It does not mean that you won't get it but you should be able to fight it off better. From then on take one capsule of each every three days.

Make sure that none of this interferes with existing medication.

VERY IMPORTANT: Only use Paracetomol as a pain killer (all the others, ibuprofen, nurofen etc make it easier for the coronavirus to enter your body). DO NOT USE THEM!

Hope that helps.
I would be careful about giving medical advice on a forum. What you are writing does not entirely match what I have read about the virus, so I would be doubly careful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 24, 2020, 03:44:24 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 02:42:02 AM

VERY IMPORTANT: Only use Paracetomol as a pain killer (all the others, ibuprofen, nurofen etc make it easier for the coronavirus to enter your body). DO NOT USE THEM!

Afaik, nobody seems to be really certain about the use of Ibuprofen.
From the BBC:
Stories have been circulating online suggesting it's dangerous to take ibuprofen if you have coronavirus. Alongside genuine medical advice, false messages have been spreading, distorting the facts.

Speaking to the BBC, medical professionals said that ibuprofen is not recommended for managing coronavirus symptoms.

The NHS says that, while "there is currently no strong evidence that ibuprofen can make coronavirus (Covid-19) worse, until we have more information take paracetamol to treat the symptoms of coronavirus, unless your doctor has told you paracetamol is not suitable for you."

Those already taking ibuprofen for other conditions should not stop without consulting a doctor, though.

Both paracetamol and ibuprofen can bring a temperature down and help with flu-like symptoms. But ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not suitable for everyone and can cause side-effects - especially for people with asthma, heart and circulatory problems.

The NHS website previously recommended both paracetamol and ibuprofen, but has since changed its advice.

There is also some evidence linking ibuprofen to more severe illness from other respiratory infections.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 03:56:25 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 02:42:02 AM
If you can't find it (like me!) Vitamin D and C together should be helpful. You need a good quality (Solgar) Vitamin D tablet (1450 mg) and a high dosage (Solgar) Vitamin C tablet (1000mg). Take them for three days after a meal (one capsule of each). Your body will then have more resistance against the virus. It does not mean that you won't get it but you should be able to fight it off better. From then on take one capsule of each every three days.

OBS;OBS: What is this? The daily need of D-vitamin is in the range of 10 micrograms - elderly people maybe twice as much, so tablets containing
1450 mg sound like heavy overdosing, which may be harmful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 05:05:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 04:34:11 AM
Re: My earlier message about vitamins please see below:

'I clearly stated that the body needs to be saturated. We are not talking about a proper dose, we are talking about protection against the effects of Coronavirus.
That means no more than for 3 days, 1 D capsule in this dose and one C capsule, after that 1 capsule of D & C every three days.

I only stated in my advice what is widely known as a deterrent against some of the effects of Corona, but it is not a cure.
Medical conditions of patients have to be taken in consideration in regard to the D vitamin.'

This is from a doctor but I agree that it is best to seek your own medical advice. My reason for posting was because some GMG members were asking for advice about vitamins and I had, coincidentally just received such advice and thought that it might be helpful to share it.

But you must have got something wrong, and this is why you ought not to give advices like this.

Only one of the D vitamin tablets you mention contains a toxic dose for a human being, even if we suppose, that the tablets are 1450 micrograms and not 1450 milligrams as you write. 1450 milligrams is a so monstrous high dose, that I doubt tablets with this dose exists.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 05:20:26 AM
Quote from: Que on March 24, 2020, 01:37:49 AM
The most significant and element however, was that the duration of all measures was extended to the 1st of June..

This is at least more realistic than the actually declared duration we see in some other countries, my own being among them. And even then the measures may probably have to become extended still more.

I wish the best for you and also for all the other Duch posters here including Marc, Harry, Traverso and Herman.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 05:49:56 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 05:05:28 AM
But you must have got something wrong, and this is why you ought not to give advices like this.

Only one of the D vitamin tablets you mention contains a toxic dose for a human being, even if we suppose, that the tablets are 1450 micrograms and not 1450 milligrams as you write. 1450 milligrams is a so monstrous high dose, that I doubt tablets with this dose exists.

Hi,

I've now deleted all my posts related to vitamin advice.

A good example, I think, of the maxim that no good deed (or at least no well-intentioned deed) ever goes unpunished.

All strength to you all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 05:54:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 05:49:56 AM
Hi,

I've now deleted all my posts related to vitamin advice.

A good example, I think, of the maxim that no good deed (or at least no well-intentioned deed) ever goes unpunished.

All strength to you all.

In these days of the Disinformation Superhighway, a little filtration behooves us all.

+1 for the warm wishes to all our Dutch neighbors!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 05:56:33 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 05:49:56 AM
Hi,

I've now deleted all my posts related to vitamin advice.

A good example, I think, of the maxim that no good deed (or at least no well-intentioned deed) ever goes unpunished.

All strength to you all.

My intention is not to punish you, but I just had to react to you D vitamin advice (now deleted) above.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 05:59:39 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 05:56:33 AM
My intention is not to punish you, but I just had to react to you D vitamin advice (now deleted) above.
Fair enough. I understand that.
My best wishes to you too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 06:02:43 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 05:59:39 AM
Fair enough. I understand that.
My best wishes to you too.

Thanks, the same to you.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 06:03:37 AM
And, Jeffrey, I see the headline "a man thought aquarium cleaner with the same name as the anti-viral drug chloroquine would prevent Coronavirus. It killed him."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 06:05:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 06:03:37 AM
And, Jeffrey, I see the headline "a man thought aquarium cleaner with the same name as the anti-viral drug chloroquine would prevent Coronavirus. It killed him."

He probably drank chlorine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 06:12:55 AM

     I lost my active cases measure. WaPo is now using "confirmed cases" for countries, a number that only goes positive. They only did confirmed cases for the US and its states.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 24, 2020, 06:17:21 AM
Quote from: Daverz on March 23, 2020, 02:27:58 PM
Just got my snail mail and made sure I did the 20 second hand wash afterward...

I also got a DoorDash delivery of beer from a local brewery earlier (Karl Strauss; delicious).  It's really hard to get Amazon Fresh deliveries right now (hint: have your cart ready to go and check out at midnight), Instacart is impossible, but DoorDash seems fairly easy, probably because it's so expensive.

Interesting that beer is the only thing that never seems to go out of stock.  Probably because we are awash in grain and malt from American agriculture.
I'm not sure whether or not I mentioned this on this thread, but I've seen some articles and via t.v. that some distilleries are now making hand sanitizer and giving it out for free to people like firefighters, policemen, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 06:17:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 06:03:37 AM
And, Jeffrey, I see the headline "a man thought aquarium cleaner with the same name as the anti-viral drug chloroquine would prevent Coronavirus. It killed him."

My daughter's friend has stock-piled custard, which seems a sensible medical precaution Karl.
8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 06:22:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 06:17:39 AM
My daughter's friend has stock-piled custard, which seems a sensible medical precaution Karl.
8)


I have no quarrel with that, old dear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 06:22:56 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 06:05:15 AM
He probably drank chlorine.

Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 06:23:17 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 06:22:28 AM
I have no quarrel with that, old dear!
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 24, 2020, 06:29:06 AM
People waiting for the checks and look what's going on. Seriously?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:02:54 AM
Quote from: greg on March 24, 2020, 06:29:06 AM
People waiting for the checks and look what's going on. Seriously?  ::)

     I'm seriously looking at what's going on. I think Denmark has it right. If you want the economy to be able to pick up where it left off when the worst is over, you have to pay people not to work, and pay small businesses to stay closed for the duration. That way, we'll all get through this mess and have something to look forward to. There is no other case, this is the case. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 24, 2020, 07:04:41 AM
Read today an article that foresees major budgetary problems (and eventual bankruptcy) for countries dependent on tourism and oil price.

Countries like Spain and Portugal get about 10% of their GDP from tourism. Mexico is heavily dependent on income from oil. Its national budget factors in a 49$US price per barrel. Current prices hare half that and not expected to go up because of price war (Saudi Arabia Vs Russia) and falling global demand. To make matters worse, 8.6% of its GDP depends on tourism. And to top it all off, President Lopez Obrador enjoins his people to go out and have fun. ???

It is predicted that Saudi Arabia could be bankrupt within a few years, as Russia has a far more diversified economy. Price war could hold prices down for years. Both countries have 500 billions$ in foreign currency reserves, which is not all that much considering that the Saudis' lifestyle and expenditures (including military expenses) depend on an oil price of 80$US. The difference must be borrowed. If you have only one source of income and you mismanage it, who will lend you money?

Irak, Lybia, Congo depend on oil revenue for 38% of their budget. The pandemia could become an economic one if countries become unsolvent. 'Rich' countries hold trillions in foreign debt, which are counted as assets in their balance sheet. They're not really expecting repayment any time soon, but writing off assets deteriorates the financial picture and can lead to higher interest rates.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:04:57 AM
I read that 20,000 to 40,000 "locked down" New Yorkers are arriving in Florida every day. Can this be right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 07:22:59 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:02:54 AM
     I'm seriously looking at what's going on. I think Denmark has it right. If you want the economy to be able to pick up where it left off when the worst is over, you have to pay people not to work, and pay small businesses to stay closed for the duration. That way, we'll all get through this mess and have something to look forward to. There is no other case, this is the case. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

I certainly agree with you. Probably our government needs to increase the tax burden soon to be able to pay for all this. And we all have to contribute. Fortunately we stick together in a situation like this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 24, 2020, 07:24:43 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:04:57 AM
I read that 20,000 to 40,000 "locked down" New Yorkers are arriving in Florida every day. Can this be right?
This sounds like a typical winter day in Florida. So yeah.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 07:25:38 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:04:57 AM
I read that 20,000 to 40,000 "locked down" New Yorkers are arriving in Florida every day. Can this be right?

Rules vary in the different states, but "shelter at home" does not forbid you traveling to another home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 24, 2020, 07:31:05 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:04:57 AM
I read that 20,000 to 40,000 "locked down" New Yorkers are arriving in Florida every day. Can this be right?
Supposedly, 190 flights yesterday. Apparently though, anyone who comes is supposed to self-quarantine for 14 days (and they are being met on at the gates and such) as per an executive order from Florida's governor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 24, 2020, 07:32:13 AM
Starting tomorrow 6:00 AM Romania gets into total lockdown. We'll be allowed to leave our homes only for going to work (those who cannot work at home or who haven't already lost their jobs or been sent into forced paid unemployment) or to buy food and drugs and we must carry a written statement about where we go. Police, gendarmerie and the army will patrol the streets.

Latest update: 762 cases, 8 deaths, 74 cured.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:34:32 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:02:54 AM
     I'm seriously looking at what's going on. I think Denmark has it right. If you want the economy to be able to pick up where it left off when the worst is over, you have to pay people not to work, and pay small businesses to stay closed for the duration. That way, we'll all get through this mess and have something to look forward to. There is no other case, this is the case. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

I basically agree. I don't know about the third world, but the first world countries are rich enough to forego a few weeks production of most stuff as long as there is no resulting economic chaos, like people losing homes or business liquidating. The way to prevent that is bridge financing of some sort from the government. Yes we will have to pay for it later. Cheap at the price. Fortunately most countries seem to see that. But it will be all for nought if the Americans don't, but I think after the usual posturing crap they will.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 07:36:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 24, 2020, 07:32:13 AM
Starting tomorrow 6:00 AM Romania gets into total lockdown. We'll be allowed to leave our homes only for going to work (those who cannot work at home or who haven't already lost their jobs or been sent into forced paid unemployment) or to buy food and drugs and we must carry a written statement about where we go. Police, gendarmerie and the army will patrol the streets.

Latest update: 762 cases, 8 deaths, 74 cured.

Warm thoughts!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 07:42:11 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 24, 2020, 07:25:38 AM
Rules vary in the different states, but "shelter at home" does not forbid you traveling to another home.

How about you. Can you realize to move April 2. ?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 24, 2020, 07:50:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 07:36:15 AM
Warm thoughts!

To you too --- and to all GMGers wherever they are! Stay safe and cheer up, all this madness will pass, let's hope rather sooner than later.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:50:56 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 07:34:32 AM
I basically agree. I don't know about the third world, but the first world countries are rich enough to forego a few weeks production of most stuff as long as there is no resulting economic chaos, like people losing homes or business liquidating. The way to prevent that is bridge financing of some sort from the government. Yes we will have to pay for it later. Cheap at the price. Fortunately most countries seem to see that. But it will be all for nought if the Americans don't, but I think after the usual posturing crap they will.

    No, if we act responsibly "later" will be better able to pay for itself. That's the whole point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:55:00 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 07:22:59 AM
I certainly agree with you. Probably our government needs to increase the tax burden soon to be able to pay for all this.

     That would be insane. You are disagreeing with me. The government has to net spend far greater than it is. What would be the point of clawing it back?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 24, 2020, 07:55:28 AM
Everybody stay safe... I wish you all the best.

I myself am kinda locking myself in my apartment... only leaving once a week for shopping.
Trying to walk and dance a little in my room. Doing some push-ups. Sitting on the balcony, to enjoy some sunshine.

I'm able to work at home, but my working contract ends on April 30 though.
Spoke to my current employer on the phone: prospects of a new contract aren't all that good. Too bad.

Well, back to dancing in me room again. With me headphones on.
Don't wanna infect me neighbours, don't wanna annoy them either.
Uhhh... Bach or Bowie?

No, wait: MADONNA.

For you, to justify my love.

This will turn into a great work-out. Gonna make me sweat for sure.

Y'all hang on, wherever you are!

:-*
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 08:04:37 AM

     My co-conspirator does her YT Tony Clifton thing. I can hear her laughing and I know what shes doing, boosting her antibodies. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

     (https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/tony-clifton.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 08:10:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:50:56 AM
    No, if we act responsibly "later" will be better able to pay for itself. That's the whole point.

I am not interested in debating monetary theory. I think we agree on the policy: If we don't prevent disruption the result will be very bad. (That is actually the whole point.) That involves government financing now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 08:17:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 07:36:15 AM
Warm thoughts!
From me too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 08:29:33 AM
India declares nationwide lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 08:30:41 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 08:10:43 AM
I am not interested in debating monetary theory. I think we agree on the policy: If we don't prevent disruption the result will be very bad. (That is actually the whole point.) That involves government financing now.

     Agreements don't just happen. If we both know what must be done, something told us. You have good reasons to be sure about the need for government action, even if you don't want to debate them. I have an idea that if people rendered explicit their ideas about what is needed and why, we wouldn't have to reinvent the wheel every time there's a crisis.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 08:34:16 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 08:29:33 AM
India declares nationwide lockdown.
Denialists tell me India is safe because it's hotter ...

Perhaps I should make a post listing some of the deranged arguments I have been rebutting on another site. Or perhaps not. You wouldn't believe me.

Update. Scariest example:

Him: why didn't we lockdown for H1N1?
Me: we had a vaccine.
Him: so what?

I paraphrase but that really was the gist.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 08:40:35 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 07:55:00 AM
     That would be insane. You are disagreeing with me. The government has to net spend far greater than it is. What would be the point of clawing it back?

When the crisis is over and all again works and earn their money, they will have to accept a lower standard of living, at least for some time in order to pay for all the expenditures during the crisis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 08:47:26 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 08:40:35 AM
When the crisis is over and all again works and earn their money, they will have to accept a lower standard of living, at least for some time in order to pay for all the expenditures during the crisis.

     I don't think that will last very long if we preserve small businesses that employ about 50% of the workers. The tax return will grow as the economy grows, but trying to tax back the increase in national debt would be just as bad a taxing back the debt we already have. We don't do that, so we still won't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 24, 2020, 08:54:08 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 24, 2020, 07:25:38 AM
Rules vary in the different states, but "shelter at home" does not forbid you traveling to another home.

Miami is a 20 hour drive from New-York. You have to refuel 2-3 times (insert card, keypunch your PIN number, take the nozzle), get inside for 2 coffees, pay in cash etc. Check in at the motel, get the door key/card from the attendant, use facilities, get out for lunch etc. Then you get to your condo, fridge is empty, drive to the grocery to replenish, talk to Harry and Dorothy from the bridge club, get the local newspaper from the mailbox... That's a lot of contacts with potentially infected surfaces or persons.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 24, 2020, 08:56:01 AM
It does make you wonder if someone up there is shaking a fist at us. A depressing dank grey winter, rainfall breaking all records and floods ruining homes and businesses. Our PM informs us gravely that we must stay in our homes and not venture out, and what happens? The sun comes out, the sky is blue and the hottest March day since God knows when!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 24, 2020, 08:56:05 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 08:29:33 AM
India declares nationwide lockdown.

It'll be interesting to see how they enforce that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 09:00:14 AM

     It's a nice day where I am, so if I want I can go sit on the front porch and theorize at the Cowcat when he comes by. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 09:28:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 24, 2020, 08:56:05 AM
It'll be interesting to see how they enforce that.

Yeah. Enforcement is a dead end really. It's not like you are closing off a particular place for a set time.  You need persuasion and peer pressure and social norms or it will just fall apart quickly.
This is why I fight the denialists online (my wife thinks it a waste). We need voluntary compliance and self control.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 24, 2020, 09:59:06 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 09:28:28 AM
Yeah. Enforcement is a dead end really. It's not like you are closing off a particular place for a set time.  You need persuasion and peer pressure and social norms or it will just fall apart quickly.
This is why I fight the denialists online (my wife thinks it a waste). We need voluntary compliance and self control.

I presume most if not all denialists are also anti-vaxers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 24, 2020, 10:05:10 AM
I don't have any neighbors I can see so I've been out every day on the local mountain without breaking isolation protocols. But rejoice my droogs, the cure is here:



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 10:08:50 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 07:42:11 AM
How about you. Can you realize to move April 2. ?

All indications are that the answer is yes. Nothing is certain at this point, but it looks like Trump has lost his taste for anti-virus measures, and that imposition of travel restrictions is less likely. I think worst case is they will make be self-quaranteen for 14 days when I get there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 10:18:43 AM
Quote from: André on March 24, 2020, 08:54:08 AM
Miami is a 20 hour drive from New-York. You have to refuel 2-3 times (insert card, keypunch your PIN number, take the nozzle), get inside for 2 coffees, pay in cash etc. Check in at the motel, get the door key/card from the attendant, use facilities, get out for lunch etc. Then you get to your condo, fridge is empty, drive to the grocery to replenish, talk to Harry and Dorothy from the bridge club, get the local newspaper from the mailbox... That's a lot of contacts with potentially infected surfaces or persons.

I sold my house in California 6 weeks ago (deal just being finalized) after being laid off. I have a new job and a new home in Texas. It would make sense to forbid me to travel, so I could live on the street in California? Nonessential travel may be prohibited (vacationing, etc). Essential travel, i.e. travel necessary to return home to perform essential (allowed) work functions is not prohibited. I don't know what fraction of New Yorkers traveling to Florida would properly qualify as essential.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 24, 2020, 10:20:43 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 24, 2020, 10:05:10 AM
[...] But rejoice my droogs, the cure is here:

Rockin' good news! :blank:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 10:23:33 AM
Here is a verbatim exchange I just had
Quote
QuoteSo contrary to what the experts are telling us, we need more tests and more testing.

No, that's not contrary to what the experts are saying. It is exactly what the experts are saying. The problem is we haven't had enough test kits. We are getting more, but still don't have enough. No one disputes testing and targeted isolation is the better response. It is physically impossible at this moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 24, 2020, 10:30:38 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/us-may-become-centre-of-coronavirus-pandemic-who-says
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 24, 2020, 10:58:04 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 24, 2020, 03:56:25 AM
OBS;OBS: What is this? The daily need of D-vitamin is in the range of 10 micrograms - elderly people maybe twice as much, so tablets containing
1450 mg sound like heavy overdosing, which may be harmful.

What Jeffrey meant was this dear Poul


Cod Liver oil in substance.
Ingredients:
Formula 1450 mg, take a few or less micrograms.
Is: Omega III, fish oil, TG 1400mg, Recommended intake 2000mg, EPA 252 mg, and DHA 168 mg.
Fish oil 50 mg, recommended intake 50 mg.
Vitamin A 3000 ug, recommended intake, 3000 ug.
Vitamin D 75 ug, recommended intake 75 ug.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 24, 2020, 11:14:16 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 24, 2020, 10:18:43 AM
I don't know what fraction of New Yorkers traveling to Florida would properly qualify as essential.

Speaking as a Floridian: the answer to that is zero.

GMGers from New York would be the sole exception.

Seriously though (and linking to enforcement), I don't know how DeSantis expects that order to be carried out, where they are supposed to be be housed or fed, and who makes sure they stay quarantined.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 24, 2020, 11:25:59 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2020, 08:29:33 AM
India declares nationwide lockdown.
This seems to be causing issues for some people at work that are unable to log in from home. 🤔
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 11:27:03 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 24, 2020, 11:14:16 AMSeriously though (and linking to enforcement), I don't know how DeSantis expects that order to be carried out, where they are supposed to be be housed or fed, and who makes sure they stay quarantined.

If you want to involuntarily quarantine people you need resources to enforce and feed them. China has a massive security state and they could do that. In the U.S., not clear.

In my small California town social isolation seems pretty effective. Any nonessential place you could go is closed. The only activities available are walks/hikes in parks. One park was closed because officials decided it was too crowded for effective social distancing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 11:45:12 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 24, 2020, 10:08:50 AM
All indications are that the answer is yes. Nothing is certain at this point, but it looks like Trump has lost his taste for anti-virus measures, and that imposition of travel restrictions is less likely. I think worst case is they will make be self-quaranteen for 14 days when I get there.

That's good to hear. I wish you an uncomplicated moving.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 11:56:12 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 24, 2020, 10:58:04 AM
What Jeffrey meant was this dear Poul


Cod Liver oil in substance.
Ingredients:
Formula 1450 mg, take a few or less micrograms.
Is: Omega III, fish oil, TG 1400mg, Recommended intake 2000mg, EPA 252 mg, and DHA 168 mg.
Fish oil 50 mg, recommended intake 50 mg.
Vitamin A 3000 ug, recommended intake, 3000 ug.
Vitamin D 75 ug, recommended intake 75 ug.

Yes, and this makes sense. But Jeffrey's post was right out confusing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 12:02:06 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 10:23:33 AM
No, that's not contrary to what the experts are saying. It is exactly what the experts are saying. The problem is we haven't had enough test kits. We are getting more, but still don't have enough. No one disputes testing and targeted isolation is the better response. It is physically impossible at this moment.

The most important reason, why testing has lacked behind in my country Denmark, is shortage of test kits. It is true, that the experts not always agree on which measures to take, but our government wants more testing in accordance with the recommendations of WHO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 24, 2020, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 08:47:26 AM
     I don't think that will last very long if we preserve small businesses that employ about 50% of the workers. The tax return will grow as the economy grows, but trying to tax back the increase in national debt would be just as bad a taxing back the debt we already have. We don't do that, so we still won't.

I hope you are right. If our national debt increases too much, I fear the result will become more inflation, and that would not be a good thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 24, 2020, 01:07:56 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 24, 2020, 11:14:16 AM
Speaking as a Floridian: the answer to that is zero.

GMGers from New York would be the sole exception.

Seriously though (and linking to enforcement), I don't know how DeSantis expects that order to be carried out, where they are supposed to be be housed or fed, and who makes sure they stay quarantined.
The governor also included New Jersey and Connecticut in his decision.

Personally, I have some friends who own a second home in Florida who have been there for a number of months already.  They also rent it out other times during the year; I expect that it might impact them...how much, I don't know.  They've decided to hunker down there for a while...not certain how long.  Wonder whether or not there might be problems at some point when they want to drive back home?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2020, 01:24:15 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 24, 2020, 10:30:38 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/us-may-become-centre-of-coronavirus-pandemic-who-says

Especially with the Wankmaggot Dotard gassing about "wanting to open up the economy."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 02:17:05 PM
     President volunteers to be "first over the top" in fight to restore economy

    "I'm ready to make the ultimate sacrifice", said the germophobe septuagenarian.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 02:41:02 PM
As ever Trump's mouth leaves something to be desired. But it is correct to be planning for a (staged) end to the quarantine. It is also correct to be planning for an extension. I expect there are civil servants and experts at work on both. And more. No trigger has been pulled, no decision made. We will know a lot more in two or three weeks. So will Trump. I think absent reliable testing no one can know, today, what the right course is.

Trump, Trudeau, Macron, and the rest are like hockey players try to play two pucks at once, outbreak and economic collapse. You cannot expect them to play both like Wayne Gretzky. I loathe the current leader of my country, but I will cut him some slack until I know something concrete.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 24, 2020, 03:01:14 PM
'Coughing while Asian': living in fear as racism feeds off coronavirus panic (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/coronavirus-us-asian-americans-racism)

"When Rosalind Chou was on a flight at the end of February, she saw a woman in front of her raise her phone up high, as if taking a selfie. The woman snapped a picture and sent it to a friend, whose reply showed up in big font on the woman's phone: "Oh no, is he Chinese?"

Across the aisle from Chou was a man she later learned is Korean American and a woman sitting next to him, also of Asian descent. The woman quickly replied to her friend: "There's a lot of them. Pray for me."

Chou knows her experience was not an anomaly. Across the US, Chinese Americans, and other Asians, are increasingly living in fear as the coronavirus spreads across the country amid racial prejudice that the outbreak is somehow the fault of China. It is a fear grounded in racism, but also promoted from the White House as Donald Trump – and his close advisers – insist on calling it "the Chinese virus". [...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 04:39:35 PM

     The latest numbers show NY state cases growing slightly slower than Florida (since Sunday 63% to 70%). Probably traveling is less safe than staying put for everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 24, 2020, 04:57:00 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 24, 2020, 03:01:14 PM
'Coughing while Asian': living in fear as racism feeds off coronavirus panic (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/coronavirus-us-asian-americans-racism)

"When Rosalind Chou was on a flight at the end of February, she saw a woman in front of her raise her phone up high, as if taking a selfie. The woman snapped a picture and sent it to a friend, whose reply showed up in big font on the woman's phone: "Oh no, is he Chinese?"

Across the aisle from Chou was a man she later learned is Korean American and a woman sitting next to him, also of Asian descent. The woman quickly replied to her friend: "There's a lot of them. Pray for me."

Chou knows her experience was not an anomaly. Across the US, Chinese Americans, and other Asians, are increasingly living in fear as the coronavirus spreads across the country amid racial prejudice that the outbreak is somehow the fault of China. It is a fear grounded in racism, but also promoted from the White House as Donald Trump – and his close advisers – insist on calling it "the Chinese virus". [...]

Meanwhile the President of Liberty University was on Fox declaring that the Chinese Marxists had unleashed the virus and planned to make use of it in their quest for world dominance, while Tucker Carlson started off his show with a slightly less hysterical tone but just as clear about the peril of China overtaking the US and reducing it to second place....
Neither one actually said it was a plot by China, but the Liberty U guy came closest to saying that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 24, 2020, 04:58:32 PM
Meanwhile...
Playwright Terrance McNally has died from COVID19 in a Florida hospital.
https://apnews.com/c922f464b78cde81e0780346ca10b167
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 05:17:11 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 24, 2020, 04:57:00 PM
...Tucker Carlson started off his show with a slightly less hysterical tone but just as clear about the peril of China overtaking the US and reducing it to second place...

I think it is inevitable that China will overtake the US by many measures of economic and scientific dominance. The Covid-19 pandemic may be one of the things the propels them forward, if they manage to contain it while the US succumbs to the full force of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 05:52:48 PM
Thoughts on reopening and testing  https://reason.com/2020/03/24/massive-coronavirus-testing-is-the-way-to-help-save-the-economy/ (https://reason.com/2020/03/24/massive-coronavirus-testing-is-the-way-to-help-save-the-economy/)

It's not often you see the Washington Post and Reason magazine agree.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 24, 2020, 08:12:09 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 24, 2020, 05:52:48 PM
Thoughts on reopening and testing  https://reason.com/2020/03/24/massive-coronavirus-testing-is-the-way-to-help-save-the-economy/ (https://reason.com/2020/03/24/massive-coronavirus-testing-is-the-way-to-help-save-the-economy/)

It's not often you see the Washington Post and Reason magazine agree.

These tests require PCR machines, which are expensive and if you want to buy one you are normally told there is a three month wait, since the machines are basically made to order. What they suggest that every PCR machine in the country, in University Labs, NIH research labs, National Cancer Institute Labs, etc, be commandeered and pressed into service running Covid-19 tests, with graduate students, postdocs, professors, etc, suspending their research running the tests around the clock. I've heard worse ideas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 24, 2020, 08:46:15 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 24, 2020, 04:57:00 PM
Meanwhile the President of Liberty University was on Fox declaring that the Chinese Marxists had unleashed the virus and planned to make use of it in their quest for world dominance, while Tucker Carlson started off his show with a slightly less hysterical tone but just as clear about the peril of China overtaking the US and reducing it to second place....
Neither one actually said it was a plot by China, but the Liberty U guy came closest to saying that.

I heard an interview with author Michael Lewis for his book The Fourth Risk which is about the impact of Trump putting unqualified people in departments which deal in considering and foreseeing long term impacts and crises and interviews staffers on what is no longer being addressed and what they consider the less obvious but potentially disastrous "fourth risks" to be as a result of this.

At the end of the interview Lewis himself was asked for his own answer to this question. His answer - this is over a year ago now - was that if Trump faced an economic downturn he might try to throw red meat to his rally-going base by vilifying China and then saying "China thinks we owe them all this money, I don't think they deserve it. We're not going to pay it."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 24, 2020, 09:18:46 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 24, 2020, 04:57:00 PM
Meanwhile the President of Liberty University was on Fox declaring that the Chinese Marxists had unleashed the virus and planned to make use of it in their quest for world dominance, while Tucker Carlson started off his show with a slightly less hysterical tone but just as clear about the peril of China overtaking the US and reducing it to second place....
Neither one actually said it was a plot by China, but the Liberty U guy came closest to saying that.
We're talking about the CCP, the deadly sin of Pride incarnate?
Not to mention the hug a Chinese campaign in Italy orchestrated by them?

It's all unlikely, for sure, that everything is a big calculated scheme, but if it were, would anyone really be surprised considering who we're talking about?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 10:29:32 PM
Quote from: Irons on March 24, 2020, 08:56:01 AM
It does make you wonder if someone up there is shaking a fist at us. A depressing dank grey winter, rainfall breaking all records and floods ruining homes and businesses. Our PM informs us gravely that we must stay in our homes and not venture out, and what happens? The sun comes out, the sky is blue and the hottest March day since God knows when!
Yes, this occurred to me Lol! The TV weather forecasts, with some smiling weather forecaster telling us what 'a lovely day' it is strike me now as adding insult to injury, since we are all locked away at home under some form of house arrest.  But, as my daughter tells me I'm turning into 'a grumpy old man'.
>:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 24, 2020, 11:16:12 PM
Quote from: Symphonic Addict on March 19, 2020, 08:22:28 PM
My only contribution to this thread is this: my opinion about this virus is that it was intentionally created and spread. I don't believe that it came from an animal origin by mutation. The real rulers have the worst intentions towards people, and I'm not mentioning presidents or kings. I suppose you can guess who they are.

[...]

(https://images2.imgbox.com/0b/78/22dXAcG3_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on March 24, 2020, 11:52:20 PM
Indeed. Holy crap what bullshit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 01:00:31 AM
A LETTER FROM F. SCOTT FITZGERALD, QUARANTINED IN 1920 IN THE SOUTH OF FRANCE DURING THE SPANISH INFLUENZA OUTBREAK.

Dearest Rosemary,

It was a limpid dreary day, hung as in a basket from a single dull star. I thank you for your letter. Outside, I perceive what may be a collection of fallen leaves tussling against a trash can. It rings like jazz to my ears. The streets are that empty. It seems as though the bulk of the city has retreated to their quarters, rightfully so. At this time, it seems very poignant to avoid all public spaces. Even the bars, as I told Hemingway, but to that he punched me in the stomach, to which I asked if he had washed his hands. He hadn't. He is much the denier, that one. Why, he considers the virus to be just influenza. I'm curious of his sources.

The officials have alerted us to ensure we have a month's worth of necessities. Zelda and I have stocked up on red wine, whiskey, rum, vermouth, absinthe, white wine, sherry, gin, and lord, if we need it, brandy. Please pray for us.

You should see the square, oh, it is terrible. I weep for the damned eventualities this future brings. The long afternoons rolling forward slowly on the ever-slick bottomless highball. Z. says it's no excuse to drink, but I just can't seem to steady my hand. In the distance, from my brooding perch, the shoreline is cloaked in a dull haze where I can discern an unremitting penance that has been heading this way for a long, long while. And yet, amongst the cracked cloudline of an evening's cast, I focus on a single strain of light, calling me forth to believe in a better morrow.

Faithfully yours,

F. Scott Fitzgerald
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 25, 2020, 01:23:22 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 24, 2020, 10:29:32 PM
Yes, this occurred to me Lol! The TV weather forecasts, with some smiling weather forecaster telling us what 'a lovely day' it is strike me now as adding insult to injury, since we are all locked away at home under some form of house arrest.  But, as my daughter tells me I'm turning into 'a grumpy old man'.
>:(

I'm most fortunate as you know I have an allotment, Jeffrey. The perfect environment for this as we stand in our own space for a natter, growing vegetables to eat and enjoying the peace of it all. To quote a sadly departed music forum friend "mission control :-*" is not too happy though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 03:38:34 AM
A friend sent this link to me to bring 'a little brightness into my evening'.  I hope that it does for you too:


https://www.facebook.com/1018021376/posts/10218672458135444/?d=n

Best wishes,

PD

p.s.  Is the Facebook video showing at your end?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 03:47:25 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 25, 2020, 01:23:22 AM
I'm most fortunate as you know I have an allotment, Jeffrey. The perfect environment for this as we stand in our own space for a natter, growing vegetables to eat and enjoying the peace of it all. To quote a sadly departed music forum friend "mission control :-*" is not too happy though.

I need to get back to working in my garden.  I did find out the other day that until further notice, the town's area that I bring my yard wasted too is closed 'til further notice.  I did recently resurrect my leaf mulch pile (with the help of a neighbor put the fencing back up) and used my lawnmower to break down a lot of leaves.  Branches will have to go into another pile for the time being though.

Enjoy the peace!   :)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 03:51:15 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 24, 2020, 04:39:35 PM
     The latest numbers show NY state cases growing slightly slower than Florida (since Sunday 63% to 70%). Probably traveling is less safe than staying put for everyone.
I heard over the news yesterday, that Gov. Cuomo will only be receiving 400 ventilators out of the requested 30,000 from the Feds and NYC is one of the worst hit areas!  Hope that that changes soon!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 03:53:55 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 24, 2020, 10:08:50 AM
All indications are that the answer is yes. Nothing is certain at this point, but it looks like Trump has lost his taste for anti-virus measures, and that imposition of travel restrictions is less likely. I think worst case is they will make be self-quaranteen for 14 days when I get there.
Yeah!  Fingers crossed for you.  Moving is stressful enough as is (not to mention moving to a different state and starting a new job and another baby on the way), so all good thoughts your way.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 04:05:43 AM
Just heard that Prince Charles has tested positive....wow!  So far, mild symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 05:18:37 AM
For the mathematically inclined.

http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-03-25-oxford-university-launches-world-s-first-covid-19-government-response-tracker?utm_source=miragenews&utm_medium=miragenews&utm_campaign=news

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/oxford-study-coronavirus-may-have-infected-half-of-u-k.html


https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxmu2rwsnhi9j9c/Draft-COVID-19-Model%20(13).pdf?dl=0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on March 25, 2020, 05:26:10 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 01:00:31 AM
A LETTER FROM F. SCOTT FITZGERALD, QUARANTINED IN 1920 IN THE SOUTH OF FRANCE DURING THE SPANISH INFLUENZA OUTBREAK.

Dearest Rosemary,

It was a limpid dreary day, hung as in a basket from a single dull star. I thank you for your letter. Outside, I perceive what may be a collection of fallen leaves tussling against a trash can. It rings like jazz to my ears. The streets are that empty. It seems as though the bulk of the city has retreated to their quarters, rightfully so. At this time, it seems very poignant to avoid all public spaces. Even the bars, as I told Hemingway, but to that he punched me in the stomach, to which I asked if he had washed his hands. He hadn't. He is much the denier, that one. Why, he considers the virus to be just influenza. I'm curious of his sources.

The officials have alerted us to ensure we have a month's worth of necessities. Zelda and I have stocked up on red wine, whiskey, rum, vermouth, absinthe, white wine, sherry, gin, and lord, if we need it, brandy. Please pray for us.

You should see the square, oh, it is terrible. I weep for the damned eventualities this future brings. The long afternoons rolling forward slowly on the ever-slick bottomless highball. Z. says it's no excuse to drink, but I just can't seem to steady my hand. In the distance, from my brooding perch, the shoreline is cloaked in a dull haze where I can discern an unremitting penance that has been heading this way for a long, long while. And yet, amongst the cracked cloudline of an evening's cast, I focus on a single strain of light, calling me forth to believe in a better morrow.

Faithfully yours,

F. Scott Fitzgerald

Great stuff... thanks for posting it
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mahlerian on March 25, 2020, 05:30:47 AM
Quote from: greg on March 24, 2020, 09:18:46 PM
We're talking about the CCP, the deadly sin of Pride incarnate?
Not to mention the hug a Chinese campaign in Italy orchestrated by them?

It's all unlikely, for sure, that everything is a big calculated scheme, but if it were, would anyone really be surprised considering who we're talking about?

Yes, because it would be absolutely idiotic for them to kill thousands of their own people and damage their own reputation among their citizens for the sake of possibly harming the US and potentially getting them to retaliate.

Conspiracy theories generally only make sense if you assume that there must be some kind of conspiracy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on March 25, 2020, 05:32:40 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 03:47:25 AM
I need to get back to working in my garden.  I did find out the other day that until further notice, the town's area that I bring my yard wasted too is closed 'til further notice.  I did recently resurrect my leaf mulch pile (with the help of a neighbor put the fencing back up) and used my lawnmower to break down a lot of leaves.  Branches will have to go into another pile for the time being though.

Enjoy the peace!   :)

Best wishes,

PD

I've been eyeing the steadily growing grass in the front yard for several days (indeed Spring waits for no virus), and trying to decide whether to get some exercise or to introduce my two teenagers to the fine and ancient art of lawn mowing.  The more I consider it, the more I think that I should not be selfish -- who am I to deny the yardcare wisdom of the ages to the younger generation?  In times of trial, it falls to we elders to pass on what we have learned...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 05:45:06 AM
Quote from: j winter on March 25, 2020, 05:26:10 AM
Great stuff... thanks for posting it
+1  Poignant with a touch of humor. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 05:45:49 AM
Quote from: j winter on March 25, 2020, 05:32:40 AM
I've been eyeing the steadily growing grass in the front yard for several days (indeed Spring waits for no virus), and trying to decide whether to get some exercise or to introduce my two teenagers to the fine and ancient art of lawn mowing.  The more I consider it, the more I think that I should not be selfish -- who am I to deny the yardcare wisdom of the ages to the younger generation?  In times of trial, it falls to we elders to pass on what we have learned...  ;D
;D Go for it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 06:09:06 AM
Quote from: Mahlerian on March 25, 2020, 05:30:47 AM
Yes, because it would be absolutely idiotic for them to kill thousands of their own people and damage their own reputation among their citizens ...
I don't know how old you are. During my lifetime the CCP starved 30 million of its own people. I don't believe the virus was a plot. I won't credit the motives of the CCP either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 06:38:12 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 06:09:06 AM
I won't credit the motives of the CCP either.

     The Chinese government denied the reality of the virus because that's what authoritarians always do. For an aspiring authoritarian Trump was extremely stupid to believe them. He should have known that Chinese reassurances were not trustworthy. Even Putin is listening to experts while lying to Russians and the world. Trump ignored his own experts and is trying really really hard to keep doing it. Fortunately we have "enemies of the people" to expose him.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 06:44:31 AM
 
     'Astonishing Response': Over 170,000 Brits Sign Up in One Day to Help Health Service (https://www.thedailybeast.com/coronavirus-appeal-sees-over-170000-brits-sign-up-to-help-national-health-service?ref=home)

     It's public health, it's national health, it's worth fighting for.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mahlerian on March 25, 2020, 06:47:49 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 06:09:06 AM
I don't know how old you are. During my lifetime the CCP starved 30 million of its own people. I don't believe the virus was a plot. I won't credit the motives of the CCP either.

I don't see how saying that the CCP didn't have much of a motive to unleash this virus is imputing good motives to them. An absence of a specific negative does not in this case imply anything positive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on March 25, 2020, 06:48:26 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 06:38:12 AM
Even Putin is listening to experts while lying to Russians and the world.
   
And sending help to Italy:

(https://premium.vgc.no/ap/images/448f4c53-56e4-424b-ad30-0d347225fcfc?fit=crop&h=1152&q=80&w=2048)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 07:35:46 AM
Controversial BU lab is only one in New England with live coronavirus (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/24/business/controversial-bu-lab-is-only-one-new-england-with-live-coronavirus/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 07:40:39 AM
To those who are concerned about coronavirus, Trump doesn't care (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/24/opinion/president-cares-more-about-economy-than-american-lives-midst-coronavirus-pandemic/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 25, 2020, 08:07:52 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 06:44:31 AM

     'Astonishing Response': Over 170,000 Brits Sign Up in One Day to Help Health Service (https://www.thedailybeast.com/coronavirus-appeal-sees-over-170000-brits-sign-up-to-help-national-health-service?ref=home)

     It's public health, it's national health, it's worth fighting for.

A powerful message https://youtu.be/t2JBQsJp5-s
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:16:44 AM
The CCP is fully responsible for the spreading of this virus, both internally and internationally. Had they taken draconian measures the very moment they were warned about it, it would have been contained and subsided before it had any chance to spread. But no, their main concern was to reprimand dr. Li for denigrating the grand achievements of the CCP and to threaten him with jail. I'm disgusted with, and angry at, those bloody effing communists who unleashed hell on the whole earth because they thought they could never be wrong. Not that I ever expected any good to come from communism or communists but I should have thought that globally speaking their menace is a thing of the past. I was wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 25, 2020, 08:20:23 AM
Quote from: The new erato on March 25, 2020, 06:48:26 AM
And sending help to Italy:

(https://premium.vgc.no/ap/images/448f4c53-56e4-424b-ad30-0d347225fcfc?fit=crop&h=1152&q=80&w=2048)

Putin likes to play games.....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 08:27:31 AM
Quote from: Que on March 25, 2020, 08:20:23 AM
Putin likes to play games.....
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:31:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 25, 2020, 07:40:39 AM
To those who are concerned about coronavirus, Trump doesn't care (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/24/opinion/president-cares-more-about-economy-than-american-lives-midst-coronavirus-pandemic/)

What about Boston Globe who apparently care more about their revenues than bringing information to people when they need it the most?

This is the message I received when clicking the link:

YOU'VE BEEN SELECTED
Only $1 for 6 months
Special offer just for you. Only $1 for unlimited access.
Get access now


Thanks but no thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 08:37:58 AM
(https://i.imgflip.com/3tzt0o.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 08:55:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:16:44 AM
The CCP is fully responsible for the spreading of this virus, both internally and internationally. Had they taken draconian measures the very moment they were warned about it, it would have been contained and subsided before it had any chance to spread. But no, their main concern was to reprimand dr. Li for denigrating the grand achievements of the CCP and to threaten him with jail. I'm disgusted with, and angry at, those bloody effing communists who unleashed hell on the whole earth because they thought they could never be wrong. Not that I ever expected any good to come from communism or communists but I should have thought that globally speaking their menace is a thing of the past. I was wrong.

    So why did Trump accept their word and amplify their message while his intelligence agencies told him China was covering up? Is he a communist dupe or a dictator dupe? What does "I don't see why it would be Russia" mean?

    You attach too much importance to the label and not enough to how dictators behave, left ones, right ones, aspiring ones, all ones.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:59:45 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 08:55:58 AM
    So why did Trump accept their word and amplify their message while his intelligence agencies told him China was covering up? Is he a communist dupe or a dictator dupe? What does "I don't see why it would be Russia" mean?

    You attach too much importance to the label and not enough to how dictators behave, left ones, right ones, aspiring ones, all ones.

My post has got nothing to do with Trump. I don't even know, or care about, what he said. It's how I see the whole thing. We're all in deep shit because of the CCP's policies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 09:08:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:31:25 AM
What about Boston Globe who apparently care more about their revenues than bringing information to people when they need it the most?

This is the message I received when clicking the link:

YOU'VE BEEN SELECTED
Only $1 for 6 months
Special offer just for you. Only $1 for unlimited access.
Get access now


Thanks but no thanks.

     I got that, too. I subscribe to the WaPo and NYTimes because they are essential IMV. The Globe would be overkill.

Quote from: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:59:45 AM
My post has got nothing to do with Trump. I don't even know, or care about, what he said. It's how I see the whole thing. We're all in deep shit because of the CCP's policies.

    If China decided to disown the communist label and assumed a purely nationalistic one more descriptively accurate, they would have behaved the same way. Their methods and motivations would be the same. Trump would be duped by them just the same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 09:34:51 AM
Let's forget actual Covid 19 news so that the same posters can have the same fights about Donald Trump that they have on every thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 09:36:54 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 09:08:11 AM
     If China decided to disown the communist label and assumed a purely nationalistic one more descriptively accurate, they would have behaved the same way. Their methods and motivations would be the same. Trump would be duped by them just the same.

China's regime can be accurately described as national-communism. Leaving out the latter term is misleading.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 09:44:01 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 09:34:51 AM
Let's forget actual Covid 19 news so that the same posters can have the same fights about Donald Trump that they have on every thread.

     OK, sounds good to me. I think China and Trump are big parts of the pandemic story. I'll still comment on other pandemic news, though, if that's all right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 09:48:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 25, 2020, 08:31:25 AM
What about Boston Globe who apparently care more about their revenues than bringing information to people when they need it the most?

This is the message I received when clicking the link:

YOU'VE BEEN SELECTED
Only $1 for 6 months
Special offer just for you. Only $1 for unlimited access.
Get access now


Thanks but no thanks.

Well, that is an opinion piece;  articles about the pandemic proper are available to all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 09:50:41 AM
Blinkered evangelicals:

Liberty University is welcoming students back to campus, while colleges across the county have sent students home to to try slow the spread of coronavirus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 09:51:09 AM
France became the fifth country to mark more than 1,000 coronavirus deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 09:59:55 AM

     The Italian slowdown appears to be real, though very gradual. Spanish, French and US deaths are doubling every 3 days, Italian deaths are now doubling every 5 days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 10:13:07 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 09:44:01 AM
     OK, sounds good to me. I think China and Trump are big parts of the pandemic story. I'll still comment on other pandemic news, though, if that's all right.
Yes, it's perfectly alright with me if you do exactly what I just wished for you to do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 25, 2020, 10:32:12 AM
There was denial and coverup at the beginning of the outbreak, certainly. But they had 41 confirmed cases on January 10, and 571 confirmed cases on January 22, when they implemented the complete lockdown of the province. Now they have gotten to a point where there are no new infections as the point of origin. Has any western state been more proactive? I see western states that did nothing at the same stage, even after witnessing events in China and the response.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 10:42:26 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 10:13:07 AM
Yes, it's perfectly alright with me if you do exactly what I just wished for you to do.

     Trump is a Chinese Communist. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)

     
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 25, 2020, 10:32:12 AM
There was denial and coverup at the beginning of the outbreak, certainly. But they had 41 confirmed cases on January 10, and 571 confirmed cases on January 22, when they implemented the complete lockdown of the province. Now they have gotten to a point where there are no new infections as the point of origin. Has any western state been more proactive? I see western states that did nothing at the same stage, even after witnessing events in China and the response.

   
Dec. 10: Wei Guixian, one of the earliest known coronavirus patients, starts feeling ill.

Dec. 16: Patient admitted to Wuhan Central Hospital with infection in both lungs but resistant to anti-flu drugs. Staff later learned he worked at a wildlife market connected to the outbreak.

Dec. 27: Wuhan health officials are told that a new coronavirus is causing the illness.

Dec. 30:

    Ai Fen, a top director at Wuhan Central Hospital, posts information on WeChat about the new virus. She was reprimanded for doing so and told not to spread information about it.
    Wuhan doctor Li Wenliang also shares information on WeChat about the new SARS-like virus. He is called in for questioning shortly afterward.
    Wuhan health commission notifies hospitals of a "pneumonia of unclear cause" and orders them to report any related information.

Dec. 31:

    Wuhan health officials confirm 27 cases of illness and close a market they think is related to the virus' spread.
    China tells the World Health Organization's China office about the cases of an unknown illness.

Jan. 1: Wuhan Public Security Bureau brings in for questioning eight doctors who had posted information about the illness on WeChat.

    An official at the Hubei Provincial Health Commission orders labs, which had already determined that the novel virus was similar to SARS, to stop testing samples and to destroy existing samples.

Jan. 2: Chinese researchers map the new coronavirus' complete genetic information. This information is not made public until Jan. 9.

Jan. 7: Xi Jinping becomes involved in the response.

Jan. 9: China announces it has mapped the coronavirus genome.

Jan. 11–17: Important prescheduled CCP meeting held in Wuhan. During that time, the Wuhan Health Commission insists there are no new cases.

Jan. 13: First coronavirus case reported in Thailand, the first known case outside China.

Jan. 14: WHO announces Chinese authorities have seen "no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus."

Jan. 15: The patient who becomes the first confirmed U.S. case leaves Wuhan and arrives in the U.S., carrying the coronavirus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 10:53:31 AM
     It's funny, I remember the stories about the Chinese doctor who was arrested and others being told to keep quiet. That must have been around the time Trump was getting briefings from the intelligence people about what was really happening in China. Meanwhile Trump was congratulating the Chinese leader on his successful handling of the situation.

     As CNBC reported on Jan. 24:

President Donald Trump thanked Chinese President Xi Jinping for his country's handling of the coronavirus, shortly after American health officials confirmed a second case in the United States. "China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus," Trump wrote in a post on Twitter. "The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!"

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 25, 2020, 11:20:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 25, 2020, 09:50:41 AM
Blinkered evangelicals:

Liberty University is welcoming students back to campus, while colleges across the county have sent students home to to try slow the spread of coronavirus.

It may not be quite so irrational as it sounds.

During that same segment in which the President of Liberty U suggested COVID19 is a Chinese plot, he said that

1)the dorms are open for international students and special needs students, and students whose parents decided the students were safer at the school than at home (usually because home is one or another hot spot for the virus).  All other students remain at their own home.

2)all learning is done online. Even for the students who are on campus,  it will be online,  and no in classroom learning.

That's not in fact very different from what many schools are doing: students who can't go home for one reason or another are allowed to stay on campus, and all educational activity is online. My alma mater seems to be doing it that, and unlike Liberty, they have a med school and associated resources, and the CDC itself, on campus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 25, 2020, 11:22:19 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 25, 2020, 09:50:41 AM
Blinkered evangelicals:

Liberty University is welcoming students back to campus, while colleges across the county have sent students home to to try slow the spread of coronavirus.

It seems they are susceptible to magical thinking.  Who woulda knowed?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 11:33:35 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 25, 2020, 11:20:30 AM
It may not be quite so irrational as it sounds.

During that same segment in which the President of Liberty U suggested COVID19 is a Chinese plot, he said that

1)the dorms are open for international students and special needs students, and students whose parents decided the students were safer at the school than at home (usually because home is one or another hot spot for the virus).  All other students remain at their own home.

2)all learning is done online. Even for the students who are on campus,  it will be online,  and no in classroom learning.

That's not in fact very different from what many schools are doing: students who can't go home for one reason or another are allowed to stay on campus, and all educational activity is online. My alma mater seems to be doing it that, and unlike Liberty, they have a med school and associated resources, and the CDC itself, on campus.

Interesting!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 12:18:28 PM
It would be great if someone who understands statistics comment this -- Scarpia maybe. If the guys at Oxford are right it radically changes things.




https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxmu2rwsnhi9j9c/Draft-COVID-19-Model%20(13).pdf?dl=0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 12:34:25 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 12:18:28 PM
It would be great if someone who understands statistics comment this -- Scarpia maybe. If the guys at Oxford are right it radically changes things.




https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxmu2rwsnhi9j9c/Draft-COVID-19-Model%20(13).pdf?dl=0

I stopped when I read this

QuoteOur overall approach rests on the assumption that only a very small proportion of the
population is at risk of hospitalisable illness.

The real risk of the epidemic is that it will overwhelm our healthcare systems. They have assumed this risk away, more or less.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 25, 2020, 12:35:25 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 10:42:26 AMDec. 10: Wei Guixian, one of the earliest known coronavirus patients, starts feeling ill.

Dec. 16: Patient admitted to Wuhan Central Hospital with infection in both lungs but resistant to anti-flu drugs. Staff later learned he worked at a wildlife market connected to the outbreak.

Dec. 27: Wuhan health officials are told that a new coronavirus is causing the illness.

Dec. 30:

    Ai Fen, a top director at Wuhan Central Hospital, posts information on WeChat about the new virus. She was reprimanded for doing so and told not to spread information about it.
    Wuhan doctor Li Wenliang also shares information on WeChat about the new SARS-like virus. He is called in for questioning shortly afterward.
    Wuhan health commission notifies hospitals of a "pneumonia of unclear cause" and orders them to report any related information.

Dec. 31:

    Wuhan health officials confirm 27 cases of illness and close a market they think is related to the virus' spread.
    China tells the World Health Organization's China office about the cases of an unknown illness.

Jan. 1: Wuhan Public Security Bureau brings in for questioning eight doctors who had posted information about the illness on WeChat.

    An official at the Hubei Provincial Health Commission orders labs, which had already determined that the novel virus was similar to SARS, to stop testing samples and to destroy existing samples.

Jan. 2: Chinese researchers map the new coronavirus' complete genetic information. This information is not made public until Jan. 9.

Jan. 7: Xi Jinping becomes involved in the response.

Jan. 9: China announces it has mapped the coronavirus genome.

Jan. 11–17: Important prescheduled CCP meeting held in Wuhan. During that time, the Wuhan Health Commission insists there are no new cases.

Jan. 13: First coronavirus case reported in Thailand, the first known case outside China.

Jan. 14: WHO announces Chinese authorities have seen "no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus."

Jan. 15: The patient who becomes the first confirmed U.S. case leaves Wuhan and arrives in the U.S., carrying the coronavirus.


Generally it seems like local public health officials figuring out the nature of the disease as soon as could be expected, but local political leaders suppressing information and thwarting an appropriate response. The statement that no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus has been seen stands out as a red flag. But at that point there was a small cluster of cases and it could be that all could be traced back to the market where it seems to have originated. Eight days later the national government ordered the province sealed off.

My point isn't that China didn't screw it up. My point is that people are criticizing China from countries that had advanced warning and screwed it up even worse.
 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 12:43:53 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 25, 2020, 12:35:25 PM
My point isn't that China didn't screw it up. My point is that people are criticizing China from countries that had advanced warning and screwed it up even worse.
 


Niffs of scapegoating, which here more than anywhere is useless.

Scarps, best of luck with the relocation!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 25, 2020, 12:48:15 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 12:34:25 PM
I stopped when I read this

The real risk of the epidemic is that it will overwhelm our healthcare systems. They have assumed this risk away, more or less.

I don't think they've done that.  Even if only a small percentage of the population is hospitalized, our facilities could get overwhelmed. Illustration--Atlanta, where they have already filled up all their ICU beds. More dramatic illustration: NYC's hospitals are being overwhelmed with 15,000 cases (at the moment) in the city, most of them being treated at home and not in hospital. 15,000 people is about .02% of the city's population (if I am reading my calculator correctly).  So even a tiny amount of cases is wreaking havoc.

ETA...reviewing my math, that should probably be 0.2%. But it's still a small percentage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 01:08:14 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 25, 2020, 12:48:15 PM
I don't think they've done that.  Even if only a small percentage of the population is hospitalized, our facilities could get overwhelmed. Illustration--Atlanta, where they have already filled up all their ICU beds. More dramatic illustration: NYC's hospitals are being overwhelmed with 15,000 cases (at the moment) in the city, most of them being treated at home and not in hospital. 15,000 people is about .02% of the city's population (if I am reading my calculator correctly).  So even a tiny amount of cases is wreaking havoc.

ETA...reviewing my math, that should probably be 0.2%. But it's still a small percentage.
Well that makes their assumptions look even more over optimistic. My point is simply that if you assume a low enough risk you get a better outcome. They don't have any evidence it's true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 01:17:22 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 12:18:28 PM
It would be great if someone who understands statistics comment this -- Scarpia maybe. If the guys at Oxford are right it radically changes things.




https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxmu2rwsnhi9j9c/Draft-COVID-19-Model%20(13).pdf?dl=0



     The part about the first case occurring a month before the first death sounds right. It may also be right that there's far more herd immunity in the population than we know about. I've seen a figure of 80% of people who are asymptomatic. Illness is the tip of an iceberg and deaths are the tip of the tip. So, the game is to protect the most vulnerable until the population around them has recovered from a virus that never made them sick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 01:27:15 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 25, 2020, 12:35:25 PM
Generally it seems like local public health officials figuring out the nature of the disease as soon as could be expected, but local political leaders suppressing information and thwarting an appropriate response. The statement that no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus has been seen stands out as a red flag. But at that point there was a small cluster of cases and it could be that all could be traced back to the market where it seems to have originated. Eight days later the national government ordered the province sealed off.

My point isn't that China didn't screw it up. My point is that people are criticizing China from countries that had advanced warning and screwed it up even worse.
 


    I agree that what certain well informed persons did and are doing is worse, which is amazing since they are not very Communist and completely not Chinese.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 01:29:38 PM
How about a dose of good news?

Recent stories:

Doctors who were retired have come out of it and are pitching in.
News stories about people helping each other:  making surgical masks, shopping for strangers, doctors whose type of work isn't critical donating supplies from their practices
Donations from construction companies of masks
Heard about one cathedral that had found a bunch of masks and donated them:  https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-20200325-u4fore3w2nf35kjwki5arelhyy-story.html

What are some of the stories that you've heard/read lately?  We could all do with a dose of some good news.

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 01:33:56 PM

     The U.S. should seek a humanitarian truce with Iran (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-us-should-seek-a-humanitarian-truce-with-iran/2020/03/25/4dac9774-6df5-11ea-aa80-c2470c6b2034_story.html)

     Would it hurt to let Iranians know we would like to help them, and if we can't it's because their government won't let it happen?

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 25, 2020, 01:50:43 PM
Brazil gangs impose strict curfews to slow coronavirus spread (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/25/brazil-rio-gangs-coronavirus)

"Drug traffickers in one of Rio de Janeiro's best-known favelas have imposed a coronavirus curfew, amid growing fears over the impact the virus could have on some of Brazil's poorest citizens.

In recent days, as Brazil's coronavirus death toll has climbed to 46, gang members have been circulating in the Cidade de Deus (City of God) favela in western Rio ordering residents to remain indoors after 8pm.

Last weekend the low-income community – made famous by Fernando Meirelles' 2002 blockbuster of the same name – became the first such area to record a case of coronavirus.

And in an apparent attempt to prevent further infections the Red Command gang leaders who control the favela have ordered residents to stay at home.

A video apparently recorded in the City of God circulated on social media this week showing a loudspeaker broadcasting the alert: "Anyone found messing or walking around outside will be punished."

"The traffickers are doing this because the government is absent. The authorities are blind to us," one resident told the Guardian.

A report in the Rio newspaper Extra said gang members with loudhailers were moving around City of God telling its 40,000 residents: "We are imposing a curfew because nobody is taking [coronavirus] seriously. It's best to stay at home and chill. The message has been given."

City of God's gangsters are not the only outlaws attacking coronavirus in Rio's densely populated favelas, which are home to about 2 of the city's 7 million residents.

In the Morro dos Prazeres, gang members have told residents only circulate in groups of two while in Rocinha, one of Latin America's biggest favelas, traffickers have also decreed a curfew.

"The gangsters have said that after 8.30pm everybody must stay indoors and if they don't there will be reprisals," said a street hawker who lives there. "I'm staying at home – filled with fear and smothered in hand sanitizer," the man joked.

In Santa Marta, a favela that sits in the shadow of Rio's Christ the Redeemer statue, traffickers have been handing out soap and have placed signs near a public water fountain at the community's entrance that say: "Please wash your hands before entering the favela."

"I think they wrote this for the addicts who come here to buy drugs, so they don't bring the virus in," one local said. "But it won't work. People who live right up at the top of the [hilltop] favela sometimes go two weeks without running water. If people aren't even able to feed themselves, how are they supposed to stay clean?"[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2020, 02:35:09 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 12:34:25 PM
I stopped when I read this

The real risk of the epidemic is that it will overwhelm our healthcare systems. They have assumed this risk away, more or less.

No. If the population is large (and it is) and the health service is small (and it is) then it can be true that "only a very small proportion of the population is at risk of hospitalisable illness" and "it will overwhelm our healthcare systems"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 02:39:46 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2020, 01:29:38 PM
How about a dose of good news?

Recent stories:

Doctors who were retired have come out of it and are pitching in.
News stories about people helping each other:  making surgical masks, shopping for strangers, doctors whose type of work isn't critical donating supplies from their practices
Donations from construction companies of masks
Heard about one cathedral that had found a bunch of masks and donated them:  https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-20200325-u4fore3w2nf35kjwki5arelhyy-story.html

What are some of the stories that you've heard/read lately?  We could all do with a dose of some good news.

Best,

PD

The first patient here in my town, Woburn, Mass. has recovered and is out of isolation. We now have but two confirmed positives.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 25, 2020, 02:39:46 PM
The first patient here in my town, Woburn, Mass. has recovered and is out of isolation. We now have but two confirmed positives.

Excellent news. They have started using blood serum from the newly recovered to boost resistance temporarily. That won Behring the first Nobel prize in medicine in 1901! More survivors, more serum (he said like a vampire).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 02:55:44 PM
Has anyone else come across the "homeless" meme? I have seen it now in two places.
Here is an actual exchange I had today.


Quote
Quote
The way you can prove that this is all a scam is that not enough homeless people have died.
They have the worst health. The worst living conditions. The most pre-existing health problems.

They spend the most time in airports, take the most trips to Milan, entertain the most businessmen from Wuhan, spend the most time hanging out with Tom Hanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 25, 2020, 03:57:50 PM
QuoteThe way you can prove that this is all a scam is that not enough homeless people have died.
They have the worst health. The worst living conditions. The most pre-existing health problems.


     Where did this guy learn that not enough homeless people have died?

     (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Japanese_Navy_Aircraft_Carrier_Kaga.jpg)

     I'll just slip this in here for no reason. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 25, 2020, 06:32:41 PM

(https://i.postimg.cc/RF3vBCp1/200324-pompano-beach-al-1344-03ceccbbe3c8163309e2e2607af2fa87-fi.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Pompano Beach, Florida, March 17.

Some Spring Break returnees have already tested positive for coronavirus.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-coronavirus-cases-surge-spring-breakers-express-regret-n1168686

Heartbreaking.  And no, they don't deserve it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2020, 06:53:49 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 25, 2020, 06:32:41 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/RF3vBCp1/200324-pompano-beach-al-1344-03ceccbbe3c8163309e2e2607af2fa87-fi.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Pompano Beach, Florida, March 17.

Some Spring Break returnees have already tested positive for coronavirus.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-coronavirus-cases-surge-spring-breakers-express-regret-n1168686

Heartbreaking.  And no, they don't deserve it.

No, but they were foolish.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 06:56:03 PM
Nobody deserves it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 25, 2020, 06:58:00 PM
Be it noted that Pompano Beach closed its beaches the day after that photo was taken. Most of the beaches in Broward were closed the day before the photo was taken.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 25, 2020, 07:04:55 PM
I've decided to only post coronavirus humour as I'm all Covided out!

This is a classic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KPbJ0-DxTc
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 25, 2020, 07:07:57 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 25, 2020, 06:32:41 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/RF3vBCp1/200324-pompano-beach-al-1344-03ceccbbe3c8163309e2e2607af2fa87-fi.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Pompano Beach, Florida, March 17.

Some Spring Break returnees have already tested positive for coronavirus.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-coronavirus-cases-surge-spring-breakers-express-regret-n1168686

Heartbreaking.  And no, they don't deserve it.

You have to wonder what will happen in those families when Junior brings home the covid-19 infection that kills Nana.  Does everyone at the funeral just pretend that didn't happen?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 25, 2020, 07:28:22 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 25, 2020, 07:04:55 PM
I've decided to only post coronavirus humour as I'm all Covided out!

This is a classic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KPbJ0-DxTc

not at all coronavirus related:

A Capella Science - Bohemian Gravity! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rjbtsX7twc)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 26, 2020, 01:15:29 AM
I'm puzzled by the USA situation. In grave cases such as this, who is directly in charge of managing the situation nationwide? I see Trump wants everybody going back to business as usual before Easter (which would be insane) while some state governors have imposed or recommended partial lockdown (wise move and be prepared for a total one). Does Trump have the power to override their decisions? It's all such a confusing mess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 26, 2020, 01:48:09 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 25, 2020, 07:04:55 PM
I've decided to only post coronavirus humour as I'm all Covided out!

This is a classic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KPbJ0-DxTc

Contains bad language:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WOLG2nBQ-Ns
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 26, 2020, 04:37:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 25, 2020, 02:39:46 PM
The first patient here in my town, Woburn, Mass. has recovered and is out of isolation. We now have but two confirmed positives.
Yeah re out of isolation.

Heard stories of people who are using 3-D printers to make those clear plastic face shields that doctors use.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 05:25:34 AM
As long as we're having a bit of fun about the coronavirus...  WARNING: OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hks6Nq7g6P4

Actually, very powerful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 26, 2020, 05:44:29 AM
On CNN's website, check out these various re-makes:  https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2020/03/23/sweet-caroline-coronavirus-remix-moos-pkg-ebof-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/wacky-world-of-jeanne-moos/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on March 26, 2020, 05:49:04 AM
Here in Japan, we've not seen lockdown and mass unemployment (yet). But watching the news in the States is filling me with anxiety and dread. It doesn't seem real. I hope we find ways to connect and support each other through these times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 06:17:20 AM
Quote from: milk on March 26, 2020, 05:49:04 AM
Here in Japan, we've not seen lockdown and mass unemployment (yet). But watching the news in the States is filling me with anxiety and dread. It doesn't seem real. I hope we find ways to connect and support each other through these times.

As half my family (on my mother's side) live in Japan I appreciate your concern.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 26, 2020, 06:17:58 AM
Ed Yong is one the best science writers out there, recommended reading:

How the Pandemic Will End: The U.S. may end up with the worst COVID-19 outbreak in the industrialized world. This is how it's going to play out. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/03/how-will-coronavirus-end/608719/)

QuoteWith little room to surge during a crisis, America's health-care system operates on the assumption that unaffected states can help beleaguered ones in an emergency. That ethic works for localized disasters such as hurricanes or wildfires, but not for a pandemic that is now in all 50 states. Cooperation has given way to competition; some worried hospitals have bought out large quantities of supplies, in the way that panicked consumers have bought out toilet paper.

Partly, that's because the White House is a ghost town of scientific expertise. A pandemic-preparedness office that was part of the National Security Council was dissolved in 2018. On January 28, Luciana Borio, who was part of that team, urged the government to "act now to prevent an American epidemic," and specifically to work with the private sector to develop fast, easy diagnostic tests. But with the office shuttered, those warnings were published in The Wall Street Journal, rather than spoken into the president's ear. Instead of springing into action, America sat idle.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 07:21:04 AM
      Trump is instantiating the "headless chicken" model of supply management.

      The government needs to "intrude" resiliency into a system that's too expensive for the private sector to maintain on its own initiative. It's what government is for, of course. That's where collective foresight is stored, and where it's used. You need a bridge, a social program, an army for maybe a little longer than the next quarter? You need these for approximately ever? Then you do it. Doing it teaches you how and why if you don't know already. Knowing already is a good idea, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 26, 2020, 07:37:03 AM
For a bit of levity, this cracked me up (also read the following comment and his reply):

https://twitter.com/stanwawrinka/status/1241424531098656768

p.s.  Trying to figure out how to embed a Twitter tweet/thread?   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 07:43:52 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 26, 2020, 07:37:03 AM
For a bit of levity, this cracked me up (also read the following comment and his reply):

https://twitter.com/stanwawrinka/status/1241424531098656768

p.s.  Trying to figure out how to embed a Twitter tweet/thread?   :(

     If it's really necessary make an image of it and host it somewhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 26, 2020, 07:46:48 AM
Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 26, 2020, 08:14:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 26, 2020, 01:15:29 AM
I'm puzzled by the USA situation. In grave cases such as this, who is directly in charge of managing the situation nationwide? I see Trump wants everybody going back to business as usual before Easter (which would be insane) while some state governors have imposed or recommended partial lockdown (wise move and be prepared for a total one). Does Trump have the power to override their decisions? It's all such a confusing mess.

More then puzzled but worried. Each country has to deal with this as it thinks fit, but what I see of the situation in New York and the sage words of Trump I am scared. If the US goes down the toilet, much as I hate to say it, the rest of the world will follow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 08:59:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 26, 2020, 01:15:29 AM
I'm puzzled by the USA situation. In grave cases such as this, who is directly in charge of managing the situation nationwide?

     In a national emergency, the federal government is in charge subject to limits due to the federal nature of the country. The US and Germany are federal states. For the present crisis the US federal government has vast positive powers in that it has huge provisioning power. It has less negative power to prevent states from taking emergency action on their own.

     The US is doubly burdened by incompetence and dogmatic negativism at the top. Their job in practice is "not their job" in theory. And as you know all too well, belief makes it true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 26, 2020, 09:11:19 AM
Quote from: André on March 14, 2020, 10:19:55 AM
In Belgium, bars and cafés closed to business for 3 weeks as of yesterday night. But not before a last pint !

Belgians understand carpe diem in their own way. Yesterday evening in Brussels, police had to remove revellers from bars well past midnight...

(https://moustique.cdnartwhere.eu/sites/default/files/vdd_lockdown-6.jpg)

Yep. Carpe diem.

Poor wise guys and chicks.

https://world-today-news.com/young-people-who-held-lockdown-parties-are-now-on-ic-abroad/

Today, Dutch influencer Paul Goudsmit, who as King Alert has 176,000 followers on YouTube, also argued that the seriousness of the situation does not get through to young people. He points to influencers in an article on the opinion page of De Telegraaf. "Children are being brainwashed by their idols. It doesn't matter what a virologist says? It doesn't matter what politicians say either.... Because according to their idols, "it is not so bad after all."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 09:17:47 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 26, 2020, 08:14:24 AM
More then puzzled but worried. Each country has to deal with this as it thinks fit, but what I see of the situation in New York and the sage words of Trump I am scared. If the US goes down the toilet, much as I hate to say it, the rest of the world will follow.

     The US is the biggest buyer of the world's goods. Damn right the world will follow. If we run out of dollars to save ourselves we won't be the only ones to suffer. Everything tells me that an unprecedented dollar runout is in the works. Senators are complaining that the rescue package is too generous to the poorest workers. They are preparing the battlefield by treating recovery as an unmerited gift, and pointing to where this lack of merit can be found.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 26, 2020, 09:28:39 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 08:59:18 AM
For the present crisis the US federal government has vast positive powers in that it has huge provisioning power. It has less negative power to prevent states from taking emergency action on their own.

Good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 26, 2020, 09:29:04 AM
Some of you were wondering earlier why Germany had so few deaths compared to tested. Here is an article that attempts to explain that:
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/coronavirus-why-germanys-death-toll-is-so-low-125400840.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 09:36:04 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 26, 2020, 09:29:04 AM
Some of you were wondering earlier why Germany had so few deaths compared to tested. Here is an article that attempts to explain that:
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/coronavirus-why-germanys-death-toll-is-so-low-125400840.html

     Yes, I asked that and got some answers I kept to myself. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

Making direct comparisons between national mortality rates can be misleading, not just because of recording lags and different methodologies on reporting cases and deaths, but also because of the extent of testing. The more aggressively a country tests for coronavirus, the more cases of mild infections will be found and recorded in the statistics, which pushes the fatality percentage down. 

Various medical experts have attributed the low mortality partly to the fact that the first wave of coronavirus cases in Germany happened among younger people, many of whom had returned from ski holidays in other European countries, especially resorts in Italy and Austria, and recovered.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 26, 2020, 09:51:12 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 25, 2020, 06:56:03 PM
Nobody deserves it.

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it."

It's tragic though... spoke to my employer on the phone 2 days ago, and one of his main sources in these turbulent times is a dude called Robert Jensen, broadcast-dj and 'free-thinking' opinion maker, who's also got a YouTube channel. This Jensen is convinced that it's the governments who create this panic on purpose, to silent the 'ordinary people'. I begged him, cuz he's got children, to pay no attention to fools like Jensen and just try to live by the regularions and advices from government and National Health Organisations. Well, he promised he would try to do that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 10:26:51 AM
Quote from: Marc on March 26, 2020, 09:51:12 AM
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it."

It's tragic though... spoke to my employer on the phone 2 days ago, and one of his main sources in these turbulent times is a dude called Robert Jensen, broadcast-dj and 'free-thinking' opinion maker, who's also got a YouTube channel. This Jensen is convinced that it's the governments who create this panic on purpose, to silent the 'ordinary people'. I begged him, cuz he's got children, to pay no attention to fools like Jensen and just try to live by the regularions and advices from government and National Health Organisations. Well, he promised he would try to do that.

This worries me too. I am debating, if that is the word and it really isn't, with deniers on a popular blog. Their ignorance and certainty are scary. I have no fear that they will directly influence government decisions, but I worry a lot that they will lead to non compliance with quarantines and distancing. People who think it's a sham are more likely to say "the hell with it".  My wife asks why I waste my time when I cannot convince them. My answer is that I am trying to convince other people who read it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 11:03:30 AM
Pristine Republican response:

https://americanindependent.com/mike-parson-coronavirus-missouri-governor-gop-covid-19/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 12:46:27 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 10:26:51 AM
This worries me too. I am debating, if that is the word and it really isn't, with deniers on a popular blog. Their ignorance and certainty are scary. I have no fear that they will directly influence government decisions, but I worry a lot that they will lead to non compliance with quarantines and distancing. People who think it's a sham are more likely to say "the hell with it".  My wife asks why I waste my time when I cannot convince them. My answer is that I am trying to convince other people who read it.

     You're doing the right thing for the right reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 26, 2020, 12:54:06 PM
Today I have this thought in my head:

Funny how much countries spend money on military and then a microscopic virus comes and forces the whole World on it's knees.  ::)

What are all the tanks, cannons and nuclear missiles good for fighting against COVID-19? We should have nuked the bats in China to prevent this... 

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 26, 2020, 12:56:04 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 11:03:30 AM
Pristine Republican response:

https://americanindependent.com/mike-parson-coronavirus-missouri-governor-gop-covid-19/

Against ignorance even the gods strive in vain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 01:15:25 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 26, 2020, 12:54:06 PM
Today I have this thought in my head:

Funny how much countries spend money on military and then a microscopic virus comes and forces the whole World on it's knees.  ::)

What are all the tanks, cannons and nuclear missiles good for fighting against COVID-19? We should have nuked the bats in China to prevent this... 



     The weapons are not preventing a proper economic response to the pandemic. I know Sanders thinks money always comes from who has it, but it just plain doesn't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 01:49:03 PM

     The Four Possible Timelines for Life Returning to Normal (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7kxB5zCKzNkJ:https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/03/coronavirus-social-distancing-over-back-to-normal/608752/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

     This is good stuff. It's quite possible life will be fairly normal in a few months, even if the best timeline isn't the one we get.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 03:06:09 PM
The Trump re-election committee is threatening to sue to take this ad off the air.  A transparent bluff.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bkMwvmJLnc0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 26, 2020, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 03:06:09 PM
The Trump re-election committee is threatening to sue to take this ad off the air.  A transparent bluff.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bkMwvmJLnc0

     I think his claim is that "hoax" was taken out of context. Snopes sez:

What's True

oint out that Trump's claim of "their hoax" has no merit, and his behavior pattern in everything virusDuring a Feb. 28, 2020, campaign rally in South Carolina, President Donald Trump likened the Democrats' criticism of his administration's response to the new coronavirus outbreak to their efforts to impeach him, saying "this is their new hoax." During the speech he also seemed to downplay the severity of the outbreak, comparing it to the common flu.

What's False

Despite creating some confusion with his remarks, Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax.


     Trump would like to avoid seeing the inside of a courtroom forever if not longer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 26, 2020, 03:32:24 PM
The latest episode of Preet Bharara's podcast (yes, Preet is my personal Kyle) is an extensive interview with Andy Slavitt, formerly Acting Administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Services and who is currently advising officials and some in the White House on the needs and logistics of supplying front line medical workers. He's very insightful and well informed on how this is likely to play out in America moving forward and on the questions some have on health vs economy.

https://cafe.com/tracking-tackling-covid-19-with-andy-slavitt/


Also listened to an episode of the Campaign HQ podcast from David Plouffe (formerly Obama's campaign strategist) from 7 days ago that interviews Ron Klain who was Al Gore and Joe Bidens chief of staff and also Obama's Ebola Czar, talking about the differences in response then and now. This one, I might need to warn some, has lots of Trump bashing throughout (Andy Slavitt in the one above tries his best to avoid that while still clearly not a fan).

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/cadence13/campaign-hq-with-david-plouffe/e/68158600
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 26, 2020, 06:41:47 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 26, 2020, 03:06:09 PM
The Trump re-election committee is threatening to sue to take this ad off the air.  A transparent bluff.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bkMwvmJLnc0
Is it really trying to take a clip of him saying "I like this stuff" to make it seem like he likes the virus? LOL.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 06:51:53 PM

Neil Ferguson said ...

I think it would be helpful if I cleared up some confusion that has emerged in recent days. Some have interpreted my evidence to a UK parliamentary committee as indicating we have substantially revised our assessments of the potential mortality impact of COVID-19.
This is not the case. Indeed, if anything, our latest estimates suggest that the virus is slightly more transmissible than we previously thought. Our lethality estimates remain unchanged.
My evidence to Parliament referred to the deaths we assess might occur in the UK in the presence of the very intensive social distancing and other public health interventions now in place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 06:59:40 PM
Something from a guy named Bart Hall, whom I have never heard of.

Quote

Truckers are saying "fuck the log rules, I'm hauling" and they're getting supplies to the stores. People are stocking the shelves all night and letting old people shop first. Folks are buying meals for truckers, who (obviously) can't go through the drive-ups. Asking 'em what they want, then buying it for them.

Carnival Cruise Line has told Trump "We can match those big Navy Hospital ships with some fully staffed cruise ships".

GM and Ford have said "hold our cars and watch this — we can make ventilators where we were just making car parts, starting next week" — by re-engineering seat ventilators which their engineers hacked together for a new purpose. In under a week.

In a project with which I'm loosely associated, a very-effective agricultural disease-control agent was re-purposed and re-labeled specifically for Corona-virus control by the FDA and EPA in under ten days, from initial request to distribution.

Restaurants and schools have said, "we've got kitchens and staff; we can feed the poor kids who used have school lunch."

NBA basketball players have said, "Hold our basketballs while we write checks to pay the arena staff."

Construction companies are saying, "Here are some high-end masks for medical staff and doctors".

Distilleries are making sanitizer out of distilling "heads and tails" which are normally discarded. Nasty shit to drink, but effective sanitizer.

People are tipping grocery check-out clerks and thanking them for taking the risk.

Local, state, and county governments are taking control of everything the feds cannot do. Some are doing it wrong, but for the first time in decades ... they're doing it. Federalism is re-emerging, and the smallest unit of government is the individual and the family. This, too, is re-emerging after decades of dormancy.

As Japanese Admiral Isokuru Yamamoto said, after Pearl Harbor ... "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve."

I sense this has just happened. We have a wonderful country, the greatest single force for good in all human history. We have closed our borders, with good reason, yet we have top medical people now assisting North Korea in their response to the virus.

Many things have been re-set, and will never be the same.


I can say that where I live people are also rising to the occasion. Our government too is showing signs of sense: restaurants can only do takeout but now they can include alcoholic drinks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 26, 2020, 07:31:16 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 06:59:40 PM
Something from a guy named Bart Hall, whom I have never heard of.

I can say that where I live people are also rising to the occasion. Our government too is showing signs of sense: restaurants can only do takeout but now they can include alcoholic drinks!

We've been able to get alcohol delivered here in California for a few years via services like Instacart and Doordash.  Amazon Fresh is now doing it, too.  You have to present your I.D. for scanning, though.  I clean my I.D. with Clorox spray and put it under the doormat so I don't have to hand it to the shopper.

Pot dispensaries will also deliver, but I haven't tried that.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 26, 2020, 07:39:22 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 06:59:40 PM

QuoteGM and Ford have said "hold our cars and watch this — we can make ventilators where we were just making car parts, starting next week" — by re-engineering seat ventilators which their engineers hacked together for a new purpose. In under a week.


They can theoretically make them, but they require a government contract to guarantee such a large order, which is not happening - as Andy Slavitt talks about in that podcast I linked to.

Furthermore:

Trump questions need for 30,000 ventilators in New York (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/489789-trump-questions-need-for-30000-ventilators-in-new-york)

"President Trump on Thursday questioned whether New York will actually need the tens of thousands of ventilators the state's leaders have said will be required to handle the expected number of coronavirus cases there.

The president phoned into Sean Hannity's show on Fox News, where he swiped at the governors of Michigan and Washington state and cast doubt on the need for mass ventilator production to meet the demand of certain states.

"I have a feeling that a lot of the numbers that are being said in some areas are just bigger than they're going to be," Trump said on "Hannity."

"I don't believe you need 40,000 or 30,000 ventilators. You know, you go into major hospitals, sometimes they'll have two ventilators. And now all of a sudden they're saying, 'can we order 30,000 ventilators?'"

"Look, it's a bad situation," he added. "We haven't seen anything like it. But the end result is we have to get back to work and I think we can start by opening up certain parts of the country."

The president compared purchasing a ventilator to purchasing a car, calling the machines "very expensive" and "very intricate."

"And you know they'd say, like Gov. Cuomo and others, they'd say we want 30,000 of them. Thirty thousand?" Trump said. "Think of this, you know you go to hospitals that have one in a hospital and now all of a sudden everyone's asking for these vast numbers."

The comments come as governors across the country are pleading with the federal government to provide critical medical supplies to meet the increasing need of resources as coronavirus cases continue to climb. "[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on March 26, 2020, 10:50:18 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 26, 2020, 07:39:22 PM
....The comments come as governors across the country are pleading with the federal government to provide critical medical supplies to meet the increasing need of resources as coronavirus cases continue to climb. "[...]

BTW last day the US overcame China and Italy in the number of active cases...

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html?fbclid=IwAR0nDjYpnPRuRbgiGPiDCwhQo8OZWf8w8KMC9fYZ_WYvwLW2zzPGBMEtm90#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Trump finally reached his "America First". No funny, I know, but the sad truth...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 12:34:06 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 26, 2020, 06:51:53 PM
Neil Ferguson said ...

the virus is slightly more transmissible than we previously thought

"Slightly" more? Ask Italy! Ask Spain! Heck, ask US as of late! This bloody virus is much more contagious than a common flu, and that's the biggest problem.

I don't know who this Neil Ferguson is but this statement makes me clear he's either an idiot or a liar.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 12:45:00 AM
Yesterday I had to teach my first 'online lesson'. At one point it all went horribly wrong and instead of showing them a painting by Délacroix I showed them a full list of my private school emails!
::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 12:53:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 12:45:00 AM
Yesterday I had to teach my first 'online lesson'. At one point it all went horribly wrong and instead of showing them a painting by Délacroix I showed them a full list of my private school emails!
::)

Then you'd better stop watching porn for a while, who knows what you might show them.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:06:08 AM
QuoteVirus ALERT

The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent virus threat and have therefore raised their threat level from "Miffed" to "Peeved." Soon, though, level may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross."  The English have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies nearly ran out.

The virus has been re-categorized from "Tiresome" to "A Bloody Nuisance." The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was in 1588, when threatened by the Spanish Armada.

The Scots have raised their threat level from "Pissed Off" to "Let's Get the Bastard." They don't have any other levels. This is the reason they have been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.

The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its alert level from "Run" to "Hide." The only two higher levels in France are "Collaborate" and "Surrender." The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country's military capability.

Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing." Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides."

The Germans have increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs." They also have two higher levels: "Invade a Neighbour" and "Lose."

Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual; the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really, good look at the old Spanish navy.

Australia, meanwhile, has raised its alert level from "No worries" to "She'll be alright, Mate." Two more escalation levels remain: "Crikey! I think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend!" and "The barbie is cancelled." So far, no situation has ever warranted use of the final escalation level.

The Russians have said "It's not us"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:09:43 AM
^^^ Funny at first sight, but given the context and the death toll not funny at all I'm afraid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:14:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 12:34:06 AM
"Slightly" more? Ask Italy! Ask Spain! Heck, ask US as of late! This bloody virus is much more contagious than a common flu, and that's the biggest problem.

I don't know who this Neil Ferguson is but this statement makes me clear he's either an idiot or a liar.

Neil Ferguson: coronavirus expert who is working on despite symptoms
Epidemiologist is taking on a marathon of mathematical modelling at sprint speed (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/neil-ferguson-coronavirus-expert-who-is-working-on-despite-symptoms)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:17:13 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:14:11 AM
Neil Ferguson: coronavirus expert who is working on despite symptoms
Epidemiologist is taking on a marathon of mathematical modelling at sprint speed (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/neil-ferguson-coronavirus-expert-who-is-working-on-despite-symptoms)

Thanks. My comment still stands. "Slightly" more, good grief!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:19:20 AM
Let me mention something which crossed my mind, it may be a mistaken impression, but the Church is silent about this! And as far as I can see so are the Muslim, Hindu and Jewish equivalents. Religions are traditionally there to help us through, but as far as I can see, they've taken a back seat on this one. Is this because God's finally kicked the bucket?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:30:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:19:20 AM
Let me mention something which crossed my mind, it may be a mistaken impression, but the Church is silent about this!

Which Church you mean? The Pope and the RCC have regularly spoken about the situation and held many divine offices and prayers. Two days ago an international ceremony was officiated at Fatima, Portugal. Today the Pope will officiate a special liturgy in the St. Peter's Square, no public attendance of course. The Romanian Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Archbishoprics in Romania have done the same, for two weks now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:30:26 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:17:13 AM
Thanks. My comment still stands. "Slightly" more, good grief!

"Slightly more" he meant than the already horrible figure he modeled for Britain even with lockdown, which he put at 20,000 vs an estimated half million with the "herd immunity" approach.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:38:20 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:30:26 AM
"Slightly more" he meant than the already horrible figure he modeled for Britain even with lockdown, which he put at 20,000 vs an estimated half million with the "herd immunity" approach.

I don't get it. If he initially estimated 20,000 and then corrected to half million, then an increase from 20,000 to 500,000 is hardlly "slightly", it's dramatic. If he intially estimated 500,000 and then corrected to 20,000 the phrase makes no sense whatever.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 27, 2020, 01:39:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:19:20 AM
Is this because God's finally kicked the bucket?

No, on the contrary he is swinging a cat.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 27, 2020, 01:41:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:19:20 AM
Let me mention something which crossed my mind, it may be a mistaken impression, but the Church is silent about this! And as far as I can see so are the Muslim, Hindu and Jewish equivalents. Religions are traditionally there to help us through, but as far as I can see, they've taken a back seat on this one. Is this because God's finally kicked the bucket?

No worries, there is a magical holy crucifix to protect Rome:

(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200316121328-01-pope-francis-crucifix-0315-exlarge-169.jpg)

Pope Francis prays ast San Marcello al Corso church in Rome, home to a crucifix which believers say helped to end an outbreak of the plague in 1522

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/16/europe/pope-francis-prayer-coronavirus-plague-crucifix-intl/index.html

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:48:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:38:20 AM
I don't get it. If he initially estimated 20,000 and then corrected to half million, then an increase from 20,000 to 500,000 is hardlly "slightly", it's dramatic. If he intially estimated 500,000 and then corrected to 20,000 the phrase makes no sense whatever.

500,000 was his model for the do nothing and let the elderly and sick just die approach.

20,000 was his model for the social distancing and lockdown approach - which he revised slightly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:53:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:30:13 AM
Which Church you mean? The Pope and the RCC have regularly spoken about the situation and held many divine offices and prayers. Two days ago an international ceremony was officiated at Fatima, Portugal. Today the Pope will officiate a special liturgy in the St. Peter's Square, no public attendance of course. The Romanian Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Archbishoprics in Romania have done the same, for two weks now.

OK it's just me who hasn't picked up on it. It's interesting philosophically of course, because it's The Problem of Evil.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:54:40 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:53:42 AM
OK it's just me who hasn't picked up on it. It's interesting philosophically of course, because it's The Problem of Evil.

Yes. Why does an omnipotent and benevolent God allow evil to exist? Unsolvable in human terms.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 27, 2020, 02:29:33 AM
The high quality contributions on Corona from The Financial Times are free to read:

https://www.ft.com/coronavirusfree

The latest numbers: https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 03:29:11 AM
Boris Johnson has now tested positive for Coronavirus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 03:32:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 03:29:11 AM
Boris Johnson has now tested positive for Coronavirus.

Got it from Charles, I presume.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 27, 2020, 05:07:29 AM
Quote from: greg on March 26, 2020, 06:41:47 PM
Is it really trying to take a clip of him saying "I like this stuff" to make it seem like he likes the virus? LOL.

No, it's not. In the context of the ad it's clear he is bragging about his mastery of epidemiology, that experts are surprised at his expertise. Moreover, he did clearly state that the coronavirus crisis was a democrat hoax.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2020, 05:15:10 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 12:45:00 AM
Yesterday I had to teach my first 'online lesson'. At one point it all went horribly wrong and instead of showing them a painting by Délacroix I showed them a full list of my private school emails!
::)
Hang in there Jeffrey; things will get better!

Trust that Kitty hasn't (Yet?) learned how to tap dance on your keyboard?  ;)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 06:00:59 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 12:34:06 AM
"Slightly" more? Ask Italy! Ask Spain! Heck, ask US as of late! This bloody virus is much more contagious than a common flu, and that's the biggest problem.

I don't know who this Neil Ferguson is but this statement makes me clear he's either an idiot or a liar.

You are misunderstanding what he said and misunderstanding what he means by transmissible. He did the initial UK model predicting 500k dead if no action was taken. He recently ran a new model to assess the impact of the UK lockdown. Under lockdown his model says 20k dead. This was misrepresented by idiots as him backtracking and disavowing the earlier prediction. So he had to clarify to stop their lies. In his clarification he said the virus seems even more transmissible than previously thought.
In short he is saying two things. If you don't take effective measures it will swamp you, and so far the British measures seem effective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 07:05:03 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 01:48:05 AM
500,000 was his model for the do nothing and let the elderly and sick just die approach.

20,000 was his model for the social distancing and lockdown approach - which he revised slightly.

Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 06:00:59 AM
You are misunderstanding what he said and misunderstanding what he means by transmissible. He did the initial UK model predicting 500k dead if no action was taken. He recently ran a new model to assess the impact of the UK lockdown. Under lockdown his model says 20k dead. This was misrepresented by idiots as him backtracking and disavowing the earlier prediction. So he had to clarify to stop their lies. In his clarification he said the virus seems even more transmissible than previously thought.
In short he is saying two things. If you don't take effective measures it will swamp you, and so far the British measures seem effective.

Okay, guys, I stand corrected. My apologies to Mr. Ferguson for having publicly insulted him.  :D

I mistook for him for a quasi-denialist and I have no patience for such people.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 07:29:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 07:05:03 AM
Okay, guys, I stand corrected. My apologies to Mr. Ferguson for having publicly insulted him.  :D

I mistook for him for a quasi-denialist and I have no patience for such people.
I spent hours yesterday arguing with denialists who were lying about what this guy said. I just assumed everyone knew the headlines. I thought it would help to post his own words  :)

The denialists really worry me. Not because they will make policy, they won't, but because they will convince people the danger is overstated. Then you get people not following the "distancing" or lockdown or quarantine or whatever we call it.

We do need a new word! None of them quite fit this quite new situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 27, 2020, 07:39:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 01:53:42 AM
OK it's just me who hasn't picked up on it. It's interesting philosophically of course, because it's The Problem of Evil.

     You can't play baseball without a concept of baseball. You can't play evil without a concept of evil.

     You evaluate a concept according to what use you can make of it. No inhuman solution will arrive to rescue us from the imperfections of our own concept use. Like money, another such concept, it's endogenous. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)

Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 07:29:11 AM


We do need a new word! None of them quite fit this quite new situation.


     Eeeeeeeviiiiillll!!!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 27, 2020, 07:46:52 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:54:40 AM
Yes. Why does an omnipotent and benevolent God allow evil to exist? Unsolvable in human terms.

Quite solvable.  Humans can not choose good unless we have an ability to choose evil, and humans with free will are better than humans who have no will.

As to Mandryka's original question, the Jewish component is divided between faith healing, the idea that plagues are divine pumishment when communities fall into sin so we need repentance and prayer, and strict instructions from rabbis to observe social distancing and all public health orders even at the cost of traditional communal prayer and ceremonies.  A lot of this is taking place online, even among the faith healers,  so it's easily missable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 27, 2020, 07:47:42 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 07:29:11 AM

We do need a new word! None of them quite fit this quite new situation.

It's already in use: COVIDIOTS.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 07:56:41 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 27, 2020, 07:46:52 AM
Quite solvable.  Humans can not choose good unless we have an ability to choose evil, and humans with free will are better than humans who have no will.

This is correct but doesn't apply in this case. Nobody chose to be infected; nobody chose to spread the virus; it's a "natural" occurying phenomenon, a "natural" evil not a man-made one (or is it?  ;D ).

Besides, the very concept of "evil" can be quite problematic as drogulus pointed out.

Anyway, the last thing I want and need is a debate on theodicy. I'm done on the topic.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 08:01:53 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 07:29:11 AM
The denialists really worry me. Not because they will make policy, they won't, but because they will convince people the danger is overstated. Then you get people not following the "distancing" or lockdown or quarantine or whatever we call it.

Indeed this is the greatest danger, and younger people are most at risk in this respect.

Blaise Pascal's famous dictum is very apt in these times: All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.  ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 08:05:04 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 27, 2020, 07:47:42 AM
It's already in use: COVIDIOTS.
Oh, I use that already. I used it a lot yesterday after I finally lost patience! I meant for the lockdown/quarantine, which isn't quite either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 27, 2020, 08:24:07 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 08:05:04 AM
Oh, I use that already. I used it a lot yesterday after I finally lost patience! I meant for the lockdown/quarantine, which isn't quite either.

The official parlance here is "stay at home order".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:07:31 AM
I have lost of music, I have lots of books, I have internet connection, I can buy beer or wine any time I go shopping --- I can stay home for 2 months without problem. I miss my wife and son, though, they are at a different, safer location.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 27, 2020, 09:20:32 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:07:31 AM
I have lost of music, I have lots of books, I have internet connection, I can buy beer or wine any time I go shopping --- I can stay home for 2 months without problem. I miss my wife and son, though, they are at a different, safer location.

Not at all the same, of course, but we're here for you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:23:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 27, 2020, 09:20:32 AM
Not at all the same, of course, but we're here for you.

I know and I take the opportunity daily, obviously. Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:29:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 27, 2020, 09:20:32 AM
Not at all the same, of course, but we're here for you.

One of the significant cultural consequences of this may well be a shift in people's view of social media. I'm hearing lots  of people saying that they're discovering, due to confinement,  that the internet is a way of staying in human contact which is enriching their lives in unexpected ways.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:30:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:29:38 AM
One of the significant cultural consequences of this may well be a shift in people's view of social media. I'm hearing lots  of people saying that they're discovering, due to confinement,  that the internet is a way of staying in human contact which is enriching their lives in unexpected ways.

We GMGers have discovered that long time ago.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:35:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 01:54:40 AM
Yes. Why does an omnipotent and benevolent God allow evil to exist? Unsolvable in human terms.

I find this the most disturbing of questions. As I've grown older and more experienced, I've become much more aware of the good and bad things in life. The bad things overwhelm me if I think about them.  I hate the idea that there are terrible illnesses for example, and every time I discover a new one, I have difficulty sleeping.  It's as if the universe can act like the worst torturer, and that makes me feel both angry and vulnerable.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:37:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:35:07 AM
I find this the most disturbing of questions. As I've grown older and more experienced, I've become much more aware of the good and bad things in life. The bad things overwhelm me if I think about them.  I hate the idea that there are terrible illnesses for example, and every time I discover a new one, I have difficulty sleeping.  It's as if the universe can act like the worst torturer, and that makes me feel both angry and vulnerable.

You could really use reading Pascal's Meditations. Mandatory reading imo, especially in these times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:41:12 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:37:39 AM
You could really use reading Pascal's Meditations.

I'll wager you're right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:41:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:41:12 AM
I'll wager you're right.

;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 09:52:00 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:07:31 AM
I have lost of music, I have lots of books, I have internet connection, I can buy beer or wine any time I go shopping --- I can stay home for 2 months without problem. I miss my wife and son, though, they are at a different, safer location.
Pornhub is free this month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:54:44 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 09:52:00 AM
Pornhub is free this month.

How do you know it?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 27, 2020, 10:01:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:54:44 AM
How do you know it?  ;D
Just goes there for the articles...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 10:05:04 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on March 27, 2020, 10:01:48 AM
Just goes there for the articles...

Tips & Advices  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 27, 2020, 10:10:46 AM
I read about that in the news....really!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 10:16:17 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 27, 2020, 10:10:46 AM
I read about that in the news....really!  :)

Then jokes aside I'de better take the offer while it lasts.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 27, 2020, 10:18:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:54:44 AM
How do you know it?  ;D

Probably because it's always free?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 10:22:28 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 27, 2020, 10:18:24 AM
Probably because it's always free?

How do you know it?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 27, 2020, 10:35:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:35:07 AM
I find this the most disturbing of questions.



     Evil is not a problem for termites even though their sociability is a necessary feature for an evil concept to apply. The sufficient condition is the kind of consciousness involved in human level sociability. We find concepts like good and evil useful, but that use function isn't a recognition of a disembodied "real evil" that can't be solved.

     Lions are not in a condition where they can't recognize real evil out there in the world, any more than they are unaware of "real baseball". Lion games don't have concepts in them. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 27, 2020, 10:46:42 AM
I heard that stimulus package just got approved (for the US). Hopefully other countries are doing the same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 27, 2020, 11:01:49 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:41:12 AM
I'll wager you're right.

*chortle*
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 11:15:01 AM
(https://www.pinkfishmedia.net/forum/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEUHGreGWsAAio0r%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dmedium&hash=2fa78b359c6d363055229329b9c58902)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 11:53:19 AM
Has anyone got a model which says by age

% with disease
% of above needing hospitalisation
% of above needing ventilation
% of above surviving with no long term consequences
% of above surviving with important long term consequences
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 27, 2020, 11:56:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 09:30:37 AM
We GMGers have discovered that long time ago.  :D

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 27, 2020, 11:58:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 09:41:12 AM
I'll wager you're right.

Nicely played, sieur!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 12:06:25 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 27, 2020, 11:53:19 AM
Has anyone got a model which says by age

% with disease
% of above needing hospitalisation
% of above needing ventilation
% of above surviving with no long term consequences
% of above surviving with important long term consequences

Not me. And I wouldn't want a model but an official statistics, split by age groups and corrected for pre-existent serious, even life-threatening, condition(s). Drogulus has provided many pages ago one such, although apparently not corrected for those factors.

From what I've seen and learned on the media during the last two weeks, the mortality in itself is (not very much higher) than usual but the contagiousness is, very much so --- and this is the biggest problem. Imagine 10,000 cases spread over a few months or the same amount spread over just one month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on March 27, 2020, 12:27:09 PM
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
QuoteSo far this flu season, about 1% of people in the United States have developed symptoms severe enough to be hospitalized. And the overall hospitalization rate in the U.S. this season is 61 hospitalizations per 100,000 people.

....

Another recent study, considered the largest on COVID-19 cases to date, researchers from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Protection, analyzed 44,672 confirmed cases in China between Dec. 31, 2019 and Feb. 11, 2020. Of those cases, 80.9% (or 36,160 cases) were considered mild, 13.8% (6,168 cases) severe and 4.7% (2,087) critical. "Critical cases were those that exhibited respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction/failure," the researchers wrote in the paper published in China CDC Weekly.

A recent study of COVID-19 cases in the United States found that, among 4,226 reported cases , at least 508 people, or 12% were hospitalized. However, the study, published March 18 in the CDC journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) is preliminary, and the researchers note that data on hospitalizations were missing for a substantial number of patients.

It's important to note that, because respiratory viruses cause similar symptoms, it can be difficult to distinguish different respiratory viruses based on symptoms alone, according to WHO.

Death rate

The death rate from seasonal flu is typically around 0.1% in the U.S., according to The New York Times.

Though the death rate for COVID-19 is unclear, most research suggests it is higher than that of the seasonal flu.

In the study published Feb. 18 in the China CDC Weekly, researchers found a death rate from COVID-19 to be around 2.3% in mainland China. Another study of about 1,100 hospitalized patients in China, published Feb. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the overall death rate was slightly lower, around 1.4%.

Still, the death rate for COVID-19 appears to vary by location and an individual's age, among other factors. For instance, in Hubei Province, the epicenter of the outbreak, the death rate reached 2.9%; in other provinces of China, that rate was just 0.4%, according to the China CDC Weekly study. In addition, older adults have been hit the hardest. The death rate soars to 14.8% in those 80 and older; among those ages 70 to 79, the COVID-19 death rate in China seems to be about 8%; it's 3.6% for those ages 60 to 69; 1.3% for 50 to 59; 0.4% for the age group 40 to 49; and just 0.2% for people ages 10 to 39. No deaths in children under 9 have been reported.

A report published March 13 in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases adjusted for the potential time delay between hospitalization and death among cases in China. The authors estimated that, as of Feb. 11, the death rate from COVID-19 was as high as 12% in Wuhan, 4% in Hubei Province and 0.9% in the rest of China.

In the CDC's MMWR study, 45% of hospitalizations, 53% of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), and 80% of deaths associated with COVID-19 were among adults aged 65 years and older.

Virus transmission

The measure scientists use to determine how easily a virus spreads is known as the "basic reproduction number," or R0 (pronounced R-nought). This is an estimate of the average number of people who catch the virus from a single infected person, Live science previously reported. The flu has an R0 value of about 1.3, according to The New York Times.

Researchers are still working to determine the R0 for COVID-19.  Preliminary studies have estimated an R0 value for the new coronavirus to be between 2 and 3, according to the JAMA review study published Feb. 28. This means each infected person has spread the virus to an average of 2 to 3 people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 27, 2020, 12:28:38 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 27, 2020, 10:22:28 AM
How do you know it?  ;D

How do you think?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 01:23:03 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2020, 05:15:10 AM
Hang in there Jeffrey; things will get better!

Trust that Kitty hasn't (Yet?) learned how to tap dance on your keyboard?  ;)

Best wishes,

PD

Thanks PD. I'm aware of and grateful for your supportive comments. My four Year 13 students, during an informal chat online, asked to see the cat so I had to swing the laptop round so that they could see him. Their comment was 'He's enormous!'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 27, 2020, 01:46:38 PM
Quote from: greg on March 27, 2020, 10:46:42 AM
I heard that stimulus package just got approved (for the US). Hopefully other countries are doing the same.
Anyone else out there who is able to WFH and still getting $1200?

Me! 🤩😆

...well at least for some it's a stimulus. But for a lot of people, they will have to wait weeks, miss this month's rent, and spend it all for next month. Seems there should be more to this if there isn't already...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 27, 2020, 01:56:10 PM
Interesting article on the USA government's response to the Covid19:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-us-is-still-exceptional--but-now-for-its-incompetence/2020/03/26/4d6d1ade-6f9b-11ea-a3ec-70d7479d83f0_story.html (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-us-is-still-exceptional--but-now-for-its-incompetence/2020/03/26/4d6d1ade-6f9b-11ea-a3ec-70d7479d83f0_story.html)

. I find it hard to fault any specific country's response to something that is unprecedented (re: the spanish flu epidemic: if something's older than most people alive, it's too ancient to serve as a benchmark). However, we will have lots of hard earned lessons to learn from what went wrong in many different places. Theses will be written for the coming decades... :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 27, 2020, 02:50:45 PM
Quote from: greg on March 27, 2020, 01:46:38 PM
Anyone else out there who is able to WFH and still getting $1200?

Me! 🤩😆

...well at least for some it's a stimulus. But for a lot of people, they will have to wait weeks, miss this month's rent, and spend it all for next month. Seems there should be more to this if there isn't already...

The state of California has banned all evictions, so you don't pay your rent. Your landlord goes bankrupt, but can get a business loan. How you get food is another thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2020, 03:04:53 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 01:23:03 PM
Thanks PD. I'm aware of and grateful for your supportive comments. My four Year 13 students, during an informal chat online, asked to see the cat so I had to swing the laptop round so that they could see him. Their comment was 'He's enormous!'
Oh, my!  Trust by that that they meant he has a big frame vs. he's been eating too much kibble?   :)

So how old are four years...trying to remember how your educational system works!   :-[  May I ask too as to what subjects you teach them (or try to in any event  ;) ).

I had hoped at one point in time to acquire a male BSH kitten or cat...instead ended up with a female on the small size.  She was still a great kitty...sweet, smart, affectionate....and an exceptional mouser! 

Best,

PD

p.s.  Almost forgot to post this (re the thread):  At least there is some tiny bit of good coming out of the crisis:  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52065140

Maybe it will help us all to consider the ramifications of how we are living and working and how it effects the environment and give us some impetus to change more things once this is over?  One can only hope....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 27, 2020, 03:10:55 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 27, 2020, 02:50:45 PM
The state of California has banned all evictions, so you don't pay your rent. Your landlord goes bankrupt, but can get a business loan. How you get food is another thing.
That's good considering the price of rent there. So what they get ($1200 for most) should more than cover food and regular expenses. They should do the same in NYC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 03:24:49 PM
Global condom shortage looms as coronavirus shuts down production
World's biggest producer says lockdown has already caused shortfall of 100m condoms (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/27/global-condom-shortage-coronavirus-shuts-down-production)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 27, 2020, 03:40:24 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 03:24:49 PM
Global condom shortage looms as coronavirus shuts down production
World's biggest producer says lockdown has already caused shortfall of 100m condoms (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/27/global-condom-shortage-coronavirus-shuts-down-production)

Shouldn't be a problem with social distancing. No?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on March 27, 2020, 03:43:17 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 12:45:00 AM
Yesterday I had to teach my first 'online lesson'. At one point it all went horribly wrong and instead of showing them a painting by Délacroix I showed them a full list of my private school emails!
::)

;D  It could of course be seen as an instructive introduction to Art Trouvee ... Anyway, I wish you bonne chance, I imagine you'll only get better at it.

I too have been doing some video-calling for work that I usually do face to face. I find I'm having fine tune things  to virtually communicate the same message I would do in person. It's actually been rather interesting and instructive, if at times hard work.

Here in London figures are climbing and we're warned of a storm of cases approaching, these are certainly uneasy days. But it's as nothing compared to what health workers all around the country are facing every day. Last night in our street, like many across the country, we were all out at our front doors at 8pm clapping and whooping to try to show how much we appreciate their heroic efforts. Not much I know, but I was very glad to be there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 27, 2020, 03:45:57 PM
Quote from: André on March 27, 2020, 03:40:24 PM
Shouldn't be a problem with social distancing. No?

I dunno...with more couples stuck home together there might be more demand. Or less if there's also more arguments.

but more seriously:

'We fear, but have to work': isolation not an option for the poor of Nairobi
As coronavirus arrives in Kenya, retreat behind closed doors is only an alternative for those who can afford it (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/mar/27/we-fear-but-have-to-work-isolation-not-an-option-for-the-poor-of-nairobi-coronavirus)


Vital drug for people with lupus running out after unproven Covid-19 link
Italy and France now prescribing hydroxychloroquine for coronavirus despite fact its effectiveness is unknown (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/27/vital-drug-people-lupus-coronavirus-covid-19-link-hydroxychloroquine)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 27, 2020, 03:53:18 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 27, 2020, 01:23:03 PM
Thanks PD. I'm aware of and grateful for your supportive comments. My four Year 13 students, during an informal chat online, asked to see the cat so I had to swing the laptop round so that they could see him. Their comment was 'He's enormous!'

Warm thoughts, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 27, 2020, 04:59:00 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 26, 2020, 07:39:22 PM


They can theoretically make them, but they require a government contract to guarantee such a large order, which is not happening - as Andy Slavitt talks about in that podcast I linked to

Paperwork is easier than retooling. Trump invoked the defence production act today.

There is another shortage: trained personnel.  I expect someone will tell me you cannot train enough people, and I expect they will be wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 02:17:24 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2020, 03:04:53 PM
Oh, my!  Trust by that that they meant he has a big frame vs. he's been eating too much kibble?   :)

So how old are four years...trying to remember how your educational system works!   :-[  May I ask too as to what subjects you teach them (or try to in any event  ;) ).

I had hoped at one point in time to acquire a male BSH kitten or cat...instead ended up with a female on the small size.  She was still a great kitty...sweet, smart, affectionate....and an exceptional mouser! 

Best,

PD

p.s.  Almost forgot to post this (re the thread):  At least there is some tiny bit of good coming out of the crisis:  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52065140

Maybe it will help us all to consider the ramifications of how we are living and working and how it effects the environment and give us some impetus to change more things once this is over?  One can only hope....
Hi PD
I teach Year 8 (12/13 year olds), Year 12 (16/17) and Year 13 (17/18).
I teach History of Art and History. I'm also a school counsellor (as in therapy).
Re: the cat. Combination of large frame and excessive greed. For example, today he managed to convince both my wife and myself, at different times, that he had not had breakfast. So he ended up with two breakfasts. Terrible! He is the only one of the family totally unaffected by the Coronavirus crisis, except that we are around more than usual, which I think he likes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 03:24:26 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 27, 2020, 03:53:18 PM
Warm thoughts, Jeffrey!
Thanks very much Karl and the same to you. Just spoke to my daughter on the phone (she's in London). She almost certainly has Coronavirus now and was coughing a lot. So, self-isolation for her.  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 04:28:45 AM
A withering editorial on BJ here

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/opinion/coronavirus-uk-boris-johnson.html?auth=login-email&login=email

QuoteThe problem is that he has been preparing for the wrong part. The man came to power playing Falstaff, a double-dealing, comically entertaining, shameless rogue; now he is suddenly onstage as Henry V, the wartime king whose solemn judgment, intense focus, charisma and conviction must lead his nation in a time of crisis. Mr. Johnson does not know how to play that part, and it shows.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 28, 2020, 06:34:48 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 02:17:24 AM
Hi PD
I teach Year 8 (12/13 year olds), Year 12 (16/17) and Year 13 (17/18).
I teach History of Art and History. I'm also a school counsellor (as in therapy).
Re: the cat. Combination of large frame and excessive greed. For example, today he managed to convince both my wife and myself, at different times, that he had not had breakfast. So he ended up with two breakfasts. Terrible! He is the only one of the family totally unaffected by the Coronavirus crisis, except that we are around more than usual, which I think he likes.
Hmmm....a lot of extra playtime then for that cat (fun and burn off some of those calories).  Perhaps figure out a system (or ask each other?) to know who has done what...that and use a measuring scoop (ask vet for advice if kitty needs to lose weight).[/quote]  At one point in time, I had two cats (one a kitten and the other several years old) and the older cat loved to eat....hard to keep her out of the other ones food!   ::)

Quote from: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 03:24:26 AM
Thanks very much Karl and the same to you. Just spoke to my daughter on the phone (she's in London). She almost certainly has Coronavirus now and was coughing a lot. So, self-isolation for her.  :(
Oh, no.  I do hope that she gets better and soon!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 28, 2020, 07:38:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 28, 2020, 06:34:48 AM
Hmmm....a lot of extra playtime then for that cat (fun and burn off some of those calories).  Perhaps figure out a system (or ask each other?) to know who has done what...that and use a measuring scoop (ask vet for advice if kitty needs to lose weight).  At one point in time, I had two cats (one a kitten and the other several years old) and the older cat loved to eat....hard to keep her out of the other ones food!   ::)
Oh, no.  I do hope that she gets better and soon!

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 28, 2020, 07:46:19 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 02:17:24 AM
Hi PD
I teach Year 8 (12/13 year olds), Year 12 (16/17) and Year 13 (17/18).
I teach History of Art and History. I'm also a school counsellor (as in therapy).

Interesting - where does the history of art end?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 09:04:41 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 28, 2020, 06:34:48 AM
Hmmm....a lot of extra playtime then for that cat (fun and burn off some of those calories).  Perhaps figure out a system (or ask each other?) to know who has done what...that and use a measuring scoop (ask vet for advice if kitty needs to lose weight).  At one point in time, I had two cats (one a kitten and the other several years old) and the older cat loved to eat....hard to keep her out of the other ones food!   ::)
Oh, no.  I do hope that she gets better and soon!
Thanks PD and Karl,
I just spoke to her on the phone and she sounded ok if coughing a lot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 09:07:08 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 28, 2020, 07:46:19 AM
Interesting - where does the history of art end?
I'm not sure if this is a specific or philosophical question. For myself I teach mainly 19th Century European Art, Neo-Classicism, Romanticism, Realism, Symbolism etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 09:33:45 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 09:07:08 AM
I'm not sure if this is a specific or philosophical question.


Philosophical is more interesting!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 09:38:27 AM
https://twitter.com/petershankman/status/1243611688659750914

Very good! Mary Poppins. Only yanks could do this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 28, 2020, 10:05:24 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 28, 2020, 07:46:19 AM
Interesting - where does the history of art end?

Probably the same point where modern history ends.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 28, 2020, 10:28:01 AM
Quote from: JBS on March 28, 2020, 10:05:24 AM
Probably the same point where modern history ends.
And we have art older than any history too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 11:16:30 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 28, 2020, 07:46:19 AM
Interesting - where does the history of art end?

Proceeding in the spirit of Fukuyama, the end of history of art is when the struggle for recognition, the willingness to risk one's life for a purely abstract goal, the worldwide ideological struggle that called forth daring, courage, imagination, and idealism, is replaced by economic calculation, the endless solving of technical problems, environmental concerns, and the satisfaction of sophisticated consumer demands.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 28, 2020, 12:40:05 PM
Trump is considering a quarantine of parts of New York and other areas.

Mandatory quarantine is an extreme and brutal measure. But I think there are two rules
Basic rule 1:if you are going to do it, earlier is better. Once you decide act immediately.
Basic rule 2: don't announce it might happen as then some will flee. Do it, rule it out, or STFU.

Rhode Island is using troops to contain NewYorkers already.

It sounds like time. Ugh.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 28, 2020, 01:12:12 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 28, 2020, 12:40:05 PM
Trump is considering a quarantine of parts of New York and other areas.

Mandatory quarantine is an extreme and brutal measure. But I think there are two rules
Basic rule 1:if you are going to do it, earlier is better. Once you decide act immediately.
Basic rule 2: don't announce it might happen as then some will flee. Do it, rule it out, or STFU.

Rhode Island is using troops to contain NewYorkers already.

It sounds like time. Ugh.

It would be a rather useless and foolish measure...
The virus has already spread throughout the country, and it's not like NY is the source of the infection that can be contained.
As you point out, it will lead to people fleeing the area and taking the virus with them.
Same happened to people from Northern Italy fleeing to their vacation homes in Southern Italy, where the virus is now on the rise.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 28, 2020, 02:07:10 PM
Misinformation on social media:

Hundreds dead in Iran after consuming methanol thinking it was coronavirus protection (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hundreds-dead-in-iran-after-consuming-methanol-thinking-it-was-coronavirus-protection/ar-BB11NijN)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 02:15:59 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 09:33:45 AM
Philosophical is more interesting!
I agree!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 02:17:05 PM
Quote from: JBS on March 28, 2020, 10:05:24 AM
Probably the same point where modern history ends.
Agreed  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 28, 2020, 04:12:54 PM
'Nature is taking back Venice': wildlife returns to tourist-free city
With the cruise ships gone and the souvenir stalls closed, the coronavirus lockdown has transformed La Serenissima's waterways (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/20/nature-is-taking-back-venice-wildlife-returns-to-tourist-free-city)


As the rest of Europe lives under lockdown, Sweden keeps calm and carries on
All its neighbours have shut up shop to beat coronavirus but the Swedes insist 'we are not in quarantine'. Is that the right approach? (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/28/as-the-rest-of-europe-lives-under-lockdown-sweden-keeps-calm-and-carries-on)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 28, 2020, 06:13:40 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 28, 2020, 04:12:54 PM
'Nature is taking back Venice': wildlife returns to tourist-free city
With the cruise ships gone and the souvenir stalls closed, the coronavirus lockdown has transformed La Serenissima's waterways (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/20/nature-is-taking-back-venice-wildlife-returns-to-tourist-free-city)


As the rest of Europe lives under lockdown, Sweden keeps calm and carries on
All its neighbours have shut up shop to beat coronavirus but the Swedes insist 'we are not in quarantine'. Is that the right approach? (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/28/as-the-rest-of-europe-lives-under-lockdown-sweden-keeps-calm-and-carries-on)
Nice to see how nature is coming back; I had also posted a link to how the air quality across Europe and other areas seemed to be improving due to lack of manufacturing/driving, etc.  I'll try and find it and link it again here.

I had posted this earlier...perhaps no one read it (as there were no comments)?  Anyway, here it is again:  "p.s.  Almost forgot to post this (re the thread):  At least there is some tiny bit of good coming out of the crisis:  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52065140

Maybe it will help us all to consider the ramifications of how we are living and working and how it effects the environment and give us some impetus to change more things once this is over?  One can only hope...."

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 28, 2020, 06:34:46 PM
I hope so too. "I want to believe", like the poster says.

meanwhile...

For "ballance" and "fairness" here's a different perspective on the crisis:

Goop expert claims coronavirus doesn't exist and deaths caused by fear
Kelly Brogan says 'it's not possible to prove that any given pathogen has induced death'  (https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/goop-coronavirus-kelly-brogan-expert-contributor-md-deaths-covid-19-a9421476.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 28, 2020, 06:44:47 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 28, 2020, 12:40:05 PM
Trump is considering a quarantine of parts of New York and other areas.

Mandatory quarantine is an extreme and brutal measure. But I think there are two rules
Basic rule 1:if you are going to do it, earlier is better. Once you decide act immediately.
Basic rule 2: don't announce it might happen as then some will flee. Do it, rule it out, or STFU.

Rhode Island is using troops to contain NewYorkers already.

It sounds like time. Ugh.

It's an especially bad time to have a dimwitted narcissist in the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 28, 2020, 08:26:36 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 28, 2020, 06:44:47 PM
It's an especially bad time to have a dimwitted narcissist in the White House.
Worry not. I canceled my travel plans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 28, 2020, 09:03:28 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 28, 2020, 11:16:30 AM
Proceeding in the spirit of Fukuyama, the end of history of art is when the struggle for recognition, the willingness to risk one's life for a purely abstract goal, the worldwide ideological struggle that called forth daring, courage, imagination, and idealism, is replaced by economic calculation, the endless solving of technical problems, environmental concerns, and the satisfaction of sophisticated consumer demands.

I looked up Fukuyama and found this: "In the post-historical period, there will be neither art nor philosophy, just the perpetual caretaking of the museum of human history". My own utopian daydream would be along the lines of a smaller, technologically advanced, but sustainable civilisation restoring the planet like some collection of parks and heritage museums, the golden age of each place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 11:10:22 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 28, 2020, 06:44:47 PM
It's an especially bad time to have a dimwitted narcissist in the White House.
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on March 29, 2020, 01:14:07 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 28, 2020, 03:24:26 AM
Thanks very much Karl and the same to you. Just spoke to my daughter on the phone (she's in London). She almost certainly has Coronavirus now and was coughing a lot. So, self-isolation for her.  :(

All best wishes from our family to yours, we wish your daughter to find strength in everyone loving her, and a speedy and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 29, 2020, 01:14:50 AM
Quote from: Christo on March 29, 2020, 01:14:07 AM
All best wishes from our family to yours, we wish your daughter to find strength in everyone loving her, and a speedy and full recovery.

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 03:28:58 AM
Thanks so much for the kind wishes about my daughter - which mean a lot to me.  :)
She said that she felt 'blocked up' today but was otherwise ok and last night she said that she felt better although I'm aware that the virus can appear to come and go. She said that she had all the symptoms other than a fever.

On a separate note I find the govt's resrictions on driving to a place of exercise both counter-productive and unnecessarily repressive. I'm far more likely to spread the virus to someone else or contract it by walking around the village for exercise than by getting into the car for a ten minute drive to a very large area of open space called Ashdown Forest (Christo has been to a nice pub there!) where I can walk for ages without seeing anyone or easily take steps to distance myself from other walkers, joggers or horse riders. I think this is as important for mental health as for physical health.

On a lighter note, a friend of mine phoned me yesterday (Saturday) afternoon and started the conversation by saying:

'I'm very sorry to interrupt you during the football results.'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 29, 2020, 03:57:00 AM
I am already tired of the situation. I want back to normal. This is too crazy to be true. An animal bites someone on the Chinese wild animal market and this is the result a few months later? Utter lunacy. I am so done with the World. Too crazy for me. Medical science is 100 times too slow. You don't have 500 days to come up with a vaccine. Do it in 5!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 04:29:18 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 03:28:58 AM
On a separate note I find the govt's resrictions on driving to a place of exercise both counter-productive and unnecessarily repressive. I'm far more likely to spread the virus to someone else or contract it by walking around the village for exercise than by getting into the car for a ten minute drive to a very large area of open space called Ashdown Forest (Christo has been to a nice pub there!) where I can walk for ages without seeing anyone or easily take steps to distance myself from other walkers, joggers or horse riders. I think this is as important for mental health as for physical health.

It's not the government, the very quiet woodland park we were going to walk in this morning had been closed as had the car park for a nearby National Trust wood. We could still have used public footpaths through the NT land but we'd already done a decent walk round some nearly empty lanes and fields, just a few cyclists and dog walkers around. We could walk the dogs from the house to a couple of local parks or canal but they and the pavements on the way would have more people on them. Similarly there's a much quieter food shop on the way to that walking area compared to those near home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on March 29, 2020, 06:33:12 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 29, 2020, 03:57:00 AM
I am already tired of the situation. I want back to normal. This is too crazy to be true. An animal bites someone on the Chinese wild animal market and this is the result a few months later? Utter lunacy. I am so done with the World. Too crazy for me. Medical science is 100 times too slow. You don't have 500 days to come up with a vaccine. Do it in 5!

It proofs that we don't live in a perfect world. On this occasion, it's a sad proof, I agree about that. And it makes one feel helpless. But science and scientific research is never 'definite'. As one of my teachers once said: science is a never ending story of research, trying, testing, hypotheses, bumping your head, having to start all over again, do research again, trying, testing, et cetera. It takes time and patience.

I wish all of you the best... we can only hope that scientists and politicians come up with the best advices and hopefully... solutions, as soon as possible.

Stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 07:09:52 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 04:29:18 AM
It's not the government, the very quiet woodland park we were going to walk in this morning had been closed as had the car park for a nearby National Trust wood. We could still have used public footpaths through the NT land but we'd already done a decent walk round some nearly empty lanes and fields, just a few cyclists and dog walkers around. We could walk the dogs from the house to a couple of local parks or canal but they and the pavements on the way would have more people on them. Similarly there's a much quieter food shop on the way to that walking area compared to those near home.

Yes, I find it all very frustrating.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 08:01:44 AM

     Fauci said he's 'willing to bet anything' that people who recover from the new coronavirus are 'really protected from reinfection' (https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-fauci-those-who-recover-will-be-immune-2020-3)

"We don't know that for 100% certain because we haven't done the study," said Fauci, who's worked in the public health sector for more than half his life and has been the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, advising six presidents.

In a March study (which has yet to be peer-reviewed), a group of scientists infected rhesus macaques with the novel coronavirus, let them recover, then tried to reinfect them. The first infection gave some of the monkeys a mild illness, resulting in moderate pneumonia and weight loss, but the second did not seem to affect any of them.


     Of course Fauci is probably right. It will take time to get enough information about human immunity to say for 100% certain that he is. We won't wait for that, though, as risk assessment is a business of probabilities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:07:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 07:09:52 AM
Yes, I find it all very frustrating.

I don't think there's any problem you driving to Ashdown Forest if you can keep your distance from people. Preferably if you can also park well away from other cars, I suspect any large car parks will be at risk of closure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:09:52 AM
I did shout across at someone this morning that our three dogs were assistance dogs - specifically social distancing ;).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 29, 2020, 08:45:28 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:07:30 AM
I don't think there's any problem you driving to Ashdown Forest if you can keep your distance from people. Preferably if you can also park well away from other cars, I suspect any large car parks will be at risk of closure.
Some places have gone a bit loco, banning people taking walks entirely. It's not radioactivity in the air.
Here the rules for walks are that if you have tested positive, have symptoms, are under treatment, or are in self isolation you must stay home. Everyone else just has to keep distance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 09:21:39 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:07:30 AM
I don't think there's any problem you driving to Ashdown Forest if you can keep your distance from people. Preferably if you can also park well away from other cars, I suspect any large car parks will be at risk of closure.
Thanks. That's what we've been doing. I find the continuous threats of further govt restrictions very unhelpful and passive aggressive.

However, on a brighter note, having not been able to contact my daughter all day and worrying about her I noticed that she was 'online' and therefore presumably conscious! Finally I heard from her that she was feeling 'better' but had experienced difficulties 'charging her phone.'  ::) ::) >:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2020, 09:33:24 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 04:29:18 AM
It's not the government, the very quiet woodland park we were going to walk in this morning had been closed as had the car park for a nearby National Trust wood. We could still have used public footpaths through the NT land but we'd already done a decent walk round some nearly empty lanes and fields, just a few cyclists and dog walkers around. We could walk the dogs from the house to a couple of local parks or canal but they and the pavements on the way would have more people on them. Similarly there's a much quieter food shop on the way to that walking area compared to those near home.
I'm sorry for both of you.  I think that it's important to get outside and get a fresh breath of air...hard for those in large cities I'd imagine...unless you have a balcony?

So, Pooh and friends are all by themselves in Ashdown Forest?   ;)  Bet that it's a pretty place!  Do you have to stick to the paths on NT land or are you allowed to roam freely?

There was an article a few days ago on the BBC's website (I think that somebody provided a link here?) about problems with tons of people 'invading' a small Welsh town (which I guess is used to a fair bit of traffic during warmer weather?).  What about sheltering in place?  :(

There are a few paths along a river which I've been enjoying frequenting.  Annoyed at some of the people though as the paths are a bit narrow in some places; I saw a couple of women (on the older side) talking and walking a few feet apart....they couldn't be bothered to have even have one of them drop behind the other to allow more distance from myself (I was walking in the opposite direction).  At a grocery store the other day, probably most of the people were trying to keep some sort of distance from others but some were too lost in their own world grocery shopping as in the days of yore.

If I can get in gear here again, I hope to take a stroll around a local park.  If all else fails, I could resume my workouts with light weights and a bit of exercise in place to get the heart rate up (and those ever important endorphins) and get back to stretching?  Wouldn't be a bad thing!   :-[

Spent the morning making some soup....trying to do something healthy and distract my brain!

EDIT:  So, you are able to go to the forest?  I was typing whilst you were then Jeffrey.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 09:59:32 AM
     Fauci says that lifting lockdowns is 'a matter of weeks' and depends on the availability of 15-minute coronavirus testing (https://www.businessinsider.com/fauci-lifting-lockdowns-matter-of-weeks-15-minute-coronavirus-tests-2020-3)

On Friday the Food and Drug Administration approved a new COVID-19 test that delivers positive results in five minutes and negative results in 13 minutes.

The new test runs on Abbott Laboratories' ID NOW platform, which is the most common point-of-care test in the US.

After the new ID NOW COVID-19 test received FDA approval, Abbott announced that it would ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day as early as next week. According to a spokesperson from the medical device company, the tests will be available beginning on April 1.

"When we get those tests out that you can do right away, rapid point-of-care, and do it, then I think we're going to be closer [to lifting restrictions]," Fauci said.


     Let's make it April 2nd, OK? (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 10:03:47 AM

     (https://i.insider.com/5e7f8e8b2d654f3f176bc7e3?width=900&format=jpeg&auto=webp)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 29, 2020, 10:14:30 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 29, 2020, 03:57:00 AM
I. You don't have 500 days to come up with a vaccine. Do it in 5!

Sure. Let's give people some untested fingers crossed junk that causes cancers and birth defects and God knows what else.

You go first.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 29, 2020, 10:36:44 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 29, 2020, 10:14:30 AM
Sure. Let's give people some untested fingers crossed junk that causes cancers and birth defects and God knows what else.

You go first.
This could be how zombies are created.

(though some people might actually look forward to living in a survival horror-type world)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 29, 2020, 11:15:05 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 09:59:32 AM
     Fauci says that lifting lockdowns is 'a matter of weeks' and depends on the availability of 15-minute coronavirus testing (https://www.businessinsider.com/fauci-lifting-lockdowns-matter-of-weeks-15-minute-coronavirus-tests-2020-3)

On Friday the Food and Drug Administration approved a new COVID-19 test that delivers positive results in five minutes and negative results in 13 minutes.

The new test runs on Abbott Laboratories' ID NOW platform, which is the most common point-of-care test in the US.

After the new ID NOW COVID-19 test received FDA approval, Abbott announced that it would ramp up its production to make 50,000 units per day as early as next week. According to a spokesperson from the medical device company, the tests will be available beginning on April 1.

"When we get those tests out that you can do right away, rapid point-of-care, and do it, then I think we're going to be closer [to lifting restrictions]," Fauci said.


     Let's make it April 2nd, OK? (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

That's optimistic.... 
Once you can identity the immunised, they could go back to work.
But what about the rest, would they remain voluntarily in quarantine till the epidemic dies down??
And if you use selftesting, you would need a 2nd test to verify the result.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 29, 2020, 11:31:23 AM
Quote from: Que on March 29, 2020, 11:15:05 AM
That's optimistic.... 
Once you can identity the immunised, they could go back to work.
But what about the rest, would they remain voluntarily in quarantine till the epidemic dies down??
And if you use selftesting, you would need a 2nd test to verify the result.

Q


A different timeline from the UK:

QuoteUp to six months to see if measures have 'squashed' virus, says deputy chief medical officer

When asked whether the country would be on lockdown for the next six months, Harries said:

We actually anticipate our numbers will get worse over the next week, possibly two, and then we are looking to see whether we have managed to push that curve down and we start to see a decline.

This is not to say we would be in complete lockdown for six months, but as a nation we have to be really, really responsible and keep doing what we're all doing until we're sure we can gradually start lifting various interventions which are likely to be spaced – based on the science and our data – until we gradually come back to a normal way of living.

She said the government would review lockdown measures in three weeks' time. 

The issue of the three weeks is for us to review where we are and see if we've had an impact jointly on the slope of that curve. But I think to make it clear to the public if we are successful we will have squashed the top of that curve, which is brilliant, but we must not then suddenly revert to our normal way of living that would be quite dangerous.

If we stop then all of our efforts will be wasted and we could potentially see a second peak. So over time, probably over the next six months, we will have a three-week review.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 11:34:45 AM
Quote from: greg on March 29, 2020, 10:36:44 AM
This could be how zombies are created.



     I think David Chalmers did it. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/tongue.gif)

Quote from: Que on March 29, 2020, 11:15:05 AM
That's optimistic.... 
Once you can identity the immunised, they could go back to work.
But what about the rest, would they remain voluntarily in quarantine till the epidemic dies down??
And if you use selftesting, you would need a 2nd test to verify the result.

Q

     It's point of care, with rapid results and more widely available soon. So, it's rationally optimistic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 12:05:48 PM
Quote from: Marc on March 29, 2020, 06:33:12 AM


I wish all of you the best... we can only hope that scientists and politicians come up with the best advices and hopefully... solutions, as soon as possible.

Stay safe!

From me too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on March 29, 2020, 01:52:49 PM
Quote from: geralmar on March 29, 2020, 01:23:24 PM
On the bright side:

(https://i.postimg.cc/KzC51wdc/EUTZTJi-Uw-AAKp-Zd.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Had to check if those tweets were fake.. What a disgusting psychopath.

Fauci Estimates That 100,000 To 200,000 Americans Could Die From The Coronavirus (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/29/823517467/fauci-estimates-that-100-000-to-200-000-americans-could-die-from-the-coronavirus)

QuoteThe nation's leading expert on infectious diseases and member of the White House's coronavirus task force says the pandemic could kill 100,000 to 200,000 Americans and infect millions.

Dr. Anthony Fauci said based on modeling of the current pace of the coronavirus' spread in the U.S., "between 100,000 and 200,000" people may die from COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

Yay, TV ratings!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 29, 2020, 02:06:41 PM
QuoteStay safe.

Quote from: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 12:05:48 PM
From me too.

Why? Are you a danger?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 29, 2020, 04:22:38 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on March 29, 2020, 02:06:41 PM
Why? Are you a danger?

If you only knew, . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 29, 2020, 05:20:56 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 29, 2020, 11:34:45 AMIt's point of care, with rapid results and more widely available soon. So, it's rationally optimistic.

To a point. Mostly I read about manufacturers making a Covid-19 kit for their installed base machines, which involves either PCR or some sort of RNA hybridization assay.  Expanding the base of test machines won't be fast. Ultimately we need to test what, 200 million people?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:42:33 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2020, 09:33:24 AM
Do you have to stick to the paths on NT land or are you allowed to roam freely?

The National Trust charity own a load of historic houses and land like the estates around them, plus some beauty spots. It costs a fortune to maintain the buildings so they charge steeply for car parking, admission to the houses and gardens, and food and drink. A lot have public footpaths through the land which are free rights of way. In general it's possible to find somewhere to park for free further away than the vast majority would care to walk (probably about 1/4 mile) and wander about anywhere on the big estates apart from the buildings and gardens but some of the smaller places are entrance fee only.

Their website  https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/ (https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/) now says " From end of Tuesday 24 March, we closed all our car parks to further restrict the spread of coronavirus. This followed the decision to close our parks and gardens in addition to our houses, shops and cafes". We'll try a path through a distant, quiet part of one of their properties today and do a walk from the same parking place in the opposite direction if they've blocked it off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 29, 2020, 11:58:50 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 29, 2020, 03:28:58 AM
Thanks so much for the kind wishes about my daughter - which mean a lot to me.  :)
She said that she felt 'blocked up' today but was otherwise ok and last night she said that she felt better although I'm aware that the virus can appear to come and go. She said that she had all the symptoms other than a fever.

On a separate note I find the govt's resrictions on driving to a place of exercise both counter-productive and unnecessarily repressive. I'm far more likely to spread the virus to someone else or contract it by walking around the village for exercise than by getting into the car for a ten minute drive to a very large area of open space called Ashdown Forest (Christo has been to a nice pub there!) where I can walk for ages without seeing anyone or easily take steps to distance myself from other walkers, joggers or horse riders. I think this is as important for mental health as for physical health.

On a lighter note, a friend of mine phoned me yesterday (Saturday) afternoon and started the conversation by saying:

'I'm very sorry to interrupt you during the football results.'

I don't blame the Government, Jeffrey. I blame the selfish idiots who think it OK to drive to Brighton at the first sign of a summer's day. Yesterday the police broke up a bunch of lads playing football in a park! We have draconian laws for the minuscule few who flout them and we all suffer.

Trust your daughter is getting through this OK - the vast majority of youngsters do.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 30, 2020, 02:45:59 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:42:33 PM
We'll try a path through a distant, quiet part of one of their properties today and do a walk from the same parking place in the opposite direction if they've blocked it off.

Fortunately the path through the woods was still open. We only had to step aside for 4 (separate) joggers in there. Then bought some food from a quiet shop on the way back.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 05:20:13 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 29, 2020, 08:42:33 PM
The National Trust charity own a load of historic houses and land like the estates around them, plus some beauty spots. It costs a fortune to maintain the buildings so they charge steeply for car parking, admission to the houses and gardens, and food and drink. A lot have public footpaths through the land which are free rights of way. In general it's possible to find somewhere to park for free further away than the vast majority would care to walk (probably about 1/4 mile) and wander about anywhere on the big estates apart from the buildings and gardens but some of the smaller places are entrance fee only.

Their website  https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/ (https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/) now says " From end of Tuesday 24 March, we closed all our car parks to further restrict the spread of coronavirus. This followed the decision to close our parks and gardens in addition to our houses, shops and cafes". We'll try a path through a distant, quiet part of one of their properties today and do a walk from the same parking place in the opposite direction if they've blocked it off.
Thank you for the info.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 30, 2020, 06:25:41 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 05:20:13 AM
Thank you for the info.   :)

PD

How are you doing? PD?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 06:45:16 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 06:25:41 AM
How are you doing? PD?
Hi Karl! 

Sweet of you to ask!  :)

Trying to keep my sanity--like all of us.  On the positive side of things, there is a nice concert that is available to watch online; I think that it was aired on t.v. on Fox last night (here in the States).  Elton John was the host ....there are various acts and artists performing (some bands coordinating somehow or another from each of the members' homes remotely).  The special concert was to raise money for American national foodbanks and also to go to a special fund for first responders and their families to help them with their own needs during this horrific crisis.  Here's a link to it:  https://www.fox.com/watch/a9647679a60276e91d830ab21b26b179/

Made a big batch of soup (chicken, cannellini beans, lots of fresh veggies and homemade chicken stock) yesterday to keep me going and hopefully to also pass along some to a friend.  Am trying to avoid going to the markets often to limit risks to all.

Off to get some house cleaning/chores done and then hope to go out for a walk.

How are you holding out?  What are things like in Boston right now?

Best wishes,

PD

EDIT:  p.s. I've found going to this website to be a combo of entertaining and soothing.  Love the bird cams!  https://www.allaboutbirds.org/cams/

p.p.s.  A bit of irony:  Elton is currently holed up at a home of his in LA; the only home of his in which he does NOT have a piano!  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 07:15:46 AM

     Jobs Aren't Being Destroyed This Fast Elsewhere. Why Is That? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/opinion/coronavirus-economy-saez-zucman.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage&section=Opinion)

     In the US dollars must be saved by not creating them. This is a very shitty idea, as only created dollars are saved in bank accounts. I'd rather save jobs. If you pay people to stay home and businesses to stay closed there will be jobs and businesses to go back to.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 06:45:16 AM
Hi Karl! 

Sweet of you to ask!  :)

Trying to keep my sanity--like all of us.  On the positive side of things, there is a nice concert that is available to watch online; I think that it was aired on t.v. on Fox last night (here in the States).  Elton John was the host ....there are various acts and artists performing (some bands coordinating somehow or another from each of the members' homes remotely).  The special concert was to raise money for American national foodbanks and also to go to a special fund for first responders and their families to help them with their own needs during this horrific crisis.  Here's a link to it:  https://www.fox.com/watch/a9647679a60276e91d830ab21b26b179/ (https://www.fox.com/watch/a9647679a60276e91d830ab21b26b179/)

Made a big batch of soup (chicken, cannellini beans, lots of fresh veggies and homemade chicken stock) yesterday to keep me going and hopefully to also pass along some to a friend.  Am trying to avoid going to the markets often to limit risks to all.

Off to get some house cleaning/chores done and then hope to go out for a walk.

How are you holding out?  What are things like in Boston right now?

Best wishes,

PD

EDIT:  p.s. I've found going to this website to be a combo of entertaining and soothing.  Love the bird cams!  https://www.allaboutbirds.org/cams/ (https://www.allaboutbirds.org/cams/)

p.p.s.  A bit of irony:  Elton is currently holed up at a home of his in LA; the only home of his in which he does NOT have a piano!  ::)

I certainly supposed that Elton would have more homes than one;  never would have guessed that he would lack for a piano in any of them! 8)

Thanks for the birds! Will certainly watch them.

I'm a good 12 miles north of Boston, so when the rain lets up (not that I complain for it) I'll be able to get out for walks easily.

I've been composing, so I have not wanted for engaging activity.

Keep the faith!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 30, 2020, 07:31:28 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 07:15:46 AM
     Jobs Aren't Being Destroyed This Fast Elsewhere. Why Is That? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/opinion/coronavirus-economy-saez-zucman.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage&section=Opinion)

     In the US dollars must be saved by not creating them. This is a very shitty idea, as only created dollars are saved in bank accounts. I'd rather save jobs. If you pay people to stay home and businesses to stay closed there will be jobs and businesses to go back to.

With this attendant danger. There's a huge cost to paying non productive people. That expenditure will eventually he recovered by government through tax hikes. Workers will demand pay rises to compensate. Those pay rises will lead to higher prices because the cost of production has increased. Workers will demand more pay rises to compensate again. Those further pay rises will lead to even higher prices because production costs have increased again . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 08:13:53 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 30, 2020, 07:31:28 AM
With this attendant danger. There's a huge cost to paying non productive people. That expenditure will eventually he recovered by government through tax hikes. Workers will demand pay rises to compensate. Those pay rises will lead to higher prices because the cost of production has increased. Workers will demand more pay rises to compensate again. Those further pay rises will lead to even higher prices because production costs have increased again . . .

     I don't think so. Rebalancing against a deflation is not net inflationary, or perhaps I should say if it isn't even a little inflationary you're not rebalancing hard enough. This is pretty conventional economics, not far out stuff. You have a hole and you fill it. Inflation is overfilling it. What are the odds we'll do that?

    The reason wage/price spirals don't happen is that we don't often fill holes. Look at what we did in 2008-9. We half filled a hole, got no inflation (just "expectations") and an endless stream of pointless monetarist blather about QE and how ZIRP would turn everyone into zombie superborrowers. How are we going to get all those small businesses and jobs back if we run out of dollars to keep them?

     The cost of not doing what's needed is higher than the costs of doing it. You get a smaller economy coming out of the crash than you otherwise would.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 30, 2020, 08:45:41 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 08:13:53 AM
     I don't think so. Rebalancing against a deflation is not net inflationary, or perhaps I should say if it isn't even a little inflationary you're not rebalancing hard enough. This is pretty conventional economics, not far out stuff. You have a hole and you fill it. Inflation is overfilling it. What are the odds we'll do that?

    The reason wage/price spirals don't happen is that we don't often fill holes. Look at what we did in 2008-9. We half filled a hole, got no inflation (just "expectations") and an endless stream of pointless monetarist blather about QE and how ZIRP would turn everyone into zombie superborrowers. How are we going to get all those small businesses and jobs back if we run out of dollars to keep them?

     The cost of not doing what's needed is higher than the costs of doing it. You get a smaller economy coming out of the crash than you otherwise would.

I just wish I has more confidence in the UK leadership to get the country through this - both the health and the economic  consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 30, 2020, 08:45:41 AM
I just wish I has more confidence in the UK leadership to get the country through this - both the health and the economic  consequences.

     I doubt any country will regret doing "too much" on either the virus or the economy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 09:10:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
I certainly supposed that Elton would have more homes than one;  never would have guessed that he would lack for a piano in any of them! 8)
I know!  I was shocked by that too!

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
Thanks for the birds! Will certainly watch them.
They are quite fascinating to watch.  Re the feeder one at Cornell:  I often spot a crafty squirrel (probably more than one!) who as managed to invade the flat platform one--happily gorging himself or herself. lol  One snowy day there recently, there was a HUGE array of birds there!  I saw four different types of woodpeckers there, grackles, tufted titmice, American goldfinch, red-winged blackbirds, etc.   ;D

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
I'm a good 12 miles north of Boston, so when the rain lets up (not that I complain for it) I'll be able to get out for walks easily.

Excellent!

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
I've been composing, so I have not wanted for engaging activity.
Do you find it all difficult to focus well with all of the news these days?

Keep the faith!
[/quote]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 30, 2020, 09:16:31 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 30, 2020, 07:21:42 AM
I certainly supposed that Elton would have more homes than one;  never would have guessed that he would lack for a piano in any of them! 8)

Certainly he can order at least a square piano to be delivered to his door, can't he?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 09:30:53 AM

     If I'm getting this right, the current death projections are premised on a worst case "no precautions taken" model. The only way we get close to these numbers is if all precautions are removed. That now looks unlikely.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 30, 2020, 10:04:24 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 29, 2020, 11:58:50 PM
I don't blame the Government, Jeffrey. I blame the selfish idiots who think it OK to drive to Brighton at the first sign of a summer's day. Yesterday the police broke up a bunch of lads playing football in a park! We have draconian laws for the minuscule few who flout them and we all suffer.

Trust your daughter is getting through this OK - the vast majority of youngsters do.
Thanks Lol. She seems to be getting on ok.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 30, 2020, 10:04:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 30, 2020, 07:31:28 AM
With this attendant danger. There's a huge cost to paying non productive people.

I feel that way about the Federal Government, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 30, 2020, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 09:10:30 AM
Excellent!
Do you find it all difficult to focus well with all of the news these days?
I guess in this case, it helps that I am continuing a work already in progress.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on March 30, 2020, 10:56:14 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 09:30:53 AM
     If I'm getting this right, the current death projections are premised on a worst case "no precautions taken" model. The only way we get close to these numbers is if all precautions are removed. That now looks unlikely.
Depends which number you are looking at. Worst case scenario was 2.2m expected dead from the virus.  Worst case I saw more recently was 1.7m. But there are a lot of assumptions that go into that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 30, 2020, 11:35:25 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 08:13:53 AM
The cost of not doing what's needed is higher than the costs of doing it. You get a smaller economy coming out of the crash than you otherwise would.

Now I suddenly understand, what you tried to explain me earlier in this thread, and I see the common sense in the Danish approach. Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 30, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
I know I said I'd only post humour but this makes interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120666809/do-the-consequences-of-this-lockdown-really-match-the-threat
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 30, 2020, 02:02:41 PM

     
Quote from: Holden on March 30, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
I know I said I'd only post humour but this makes interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120666809/do-the-consequences-of-this-lockdown-really-match-the-threat

     Yes, it's interesting. High death rates are for a limited set of circumstances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 30, 2020, 02:03:41 PM
Maybe variolation?  http://www.overcomingbias.com/2020/03/variolation-may-cut-covid19-deaths-3-30x.html (http://www.overcomingbias.com/2020/03/variolation-may-cut-covid19-deaths-3-30x.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 30, 2020, 02:57:33 PM
There is so much activity here I really can not read everything.  I hope that this observation is new.

One of the many aspects that my non-Americans have to understand that a significant segment of out society is anti-government and anti-science.  This animas started with the Reagan Administration.

According to some of the polls I have seen 40% of Americans do not believe in Darwin.  The appearance of the Coronavirus is the result of evolution and they do not believe in it.  I have a niece who told me dinosaurs were not real.  Fossils were planted by the devil to mislead man from the true word of God.

We in the United States are now paying the price for this ignorance.  We have many scientist and leaders who are aware of the problem and are fighting an uphill struggle with the enlighten geniuses who support Trump.  In the end, among the industrialized world, we will suffer the most from this catastrophe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 03:27:00 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 30, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
I know I said I'd only post humour but this makes interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120666809/do-the-consequences-of-this-lockdown-really-match-the-threat
Humor is greatly appreciated at this time.

I do try and keep up with the news (trying not to get overwhelmed with too much at a time though...breaks are a good thing!).

Hard to hear the news about various major cities in the US struggling with things.  Incredible to believe that there's a naval hospital ship now in New York City and that they have built a temporary Covid-19 hospital unit in Central Park!  But am glad that the help is there.  Feel for NYC as they are getting hit really hard.

Hate to see that states are competing against each other to order supplies:  the Fed should be doing it.  Heard a story on NPR the other night about how the fighting/ordering by each state is driving up prices of various supplies by incredible amounts.  One question that did just occur to me:  is it just the ordering of supplies between states and/or between the governments of various countries?  I'm sure, though, that if it (the ordering) was just at the federal level that that would make a difference.  What do other Americans think here?

Best wishes and stay healthy,

PD

From what I understand (I did take a, albeit brief, look at your link) this virus is much more contagious than the average flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 30, 2020, 03:57:26 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2020, 03:27:00 PMFrom what I understand (I did take a, albeit brief, look at your link) this virus is much more contagious than the average flu.

Definitive numbers are of course not available. But the consensus seems to be that the novel coronavirus has a transmission rate (R0) of about 3, meaning each infected person gives to 3 people on average. For the flu (including the 1918 pandemic flu) the corresponding number is more like 1.5.

For seasonal flu, mortality (percentage of infected patients who die) is about 0.1%. For the novel coronavirus it seems to be 1-2%, which would give it comparable mortality to the 1918 pandemic flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 30, 2020, 03:57:44 PM
Three people I know, my brother, my niece, and a friend, are pretty sure they contracted Covid-19. I say pretty sure because the symptoms were/are severe, long-lasting, and spot on with the descriptions we've all read. But they will likely never know for sure because they, like millions of others, went untested. The niece has recovered fully, my brother is on the mend after going through a crisis five days ago. My friend, a nurse, fully recovered from her bout by the beginning of March. I've had no contact with any of them as they live hundreds of miles away. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 30, 2020, 03:59:16 PM
Twitter takes down posts promoting anti-malaria treatment for coronavirus (https://thehill.com/policy/technology/490245-twitter-takes-down-posts-promoting-anti-malaria-treatment-for-coronavirus)

"Twitter has in the last week taken down multiple posts from public figures promoting an anti-malaria drug as a way to treat coronavirus.

On Friday, the platform removed a tweet from President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claiming that hydroxychloroquine is a safe way to treat COVID-19, the disease resulting from the novel coronavirus.

A spokesperson for the platform confirmed that the tweet was removed for violating its rules on coronavirus misinformation.

Twitter earlier this month said it would begin removing coronavirus-related posts that deny expert recommendations, promote fake treatments and prevention techniques, or misleadingly claim to be from authorities.

Giuliani's now-deleted post included direct quotes from a tweet by conservative activist Charlie Kirk that has also been removed for violating rules.

A March 20 tweet from Fox News's Laura Ingraham claiming that hydroxychloroquine was in use "at many hospitals" and was showing "very promising results" was no longer available on the platform as of Monday. A spokesperson for Twitter declined to comment on whether Ingraham deleted the tweet herself or was compelled to do so but did confirm that the post fell under the platform's health misinformation policy" [...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 30, 2020, 04:21:07 PM
Self medication with hydroxychloroquine resulted in 3 deaths in France. Health authorities warn NOT to attempt a treatment with the drug.

https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2020/03/30/le-gendarme-du-medicament-alerte-sur-les-possibles-effets-secondaires-graves-des-traitements-testes-contre-le-coronavirus_6034965_3224.html (https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2020/03/30/le-gendarme-du-medicament-alerte-sur-les-possibles-effets-secondaires-graves-des-traitements-testes-contre-le-coronavirus_6034965_3224.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 30, 2020, 04:30:31 PM
A former work colleague seems to have contracted Covid-19 after traveling through San Francisco Airport.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 30, 2020, 05:03:07 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 30, 2020, 03:57:44 PM
Three people I know, my brother, my niece, and a friend, are pretty sure they contracted Covid-19. I say pretty sure because the symptoms were/are severe, long-lasting, and spot on with the descriptions we've all read. But they will likely never know for sure because they, like millions of others, went untested. The niece has recovered fully, my brother is on the mend after going through a crisis five days ago. My friend, a nurse, fully recovered from her bout by the beginning of March. I've had no contact with any of them as they live hundreds of miles away.

Once serelogical testing is fully implemented, they will be able to tell from that, since that looks for antibodies to the virus. The current testing is confined to looking for traces of the active virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 30, 2020, 06:51:53 PM
I'm going to start a rumor / misinformation campaign that eating a cd of Norton Anti-Virus will cure you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 30, 2020, 09:05:10 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on March 30, 2020, 02:57:33 PM
There is so much activity here I really can not read everything.  I hope that this observation is new.

One of the many aspects that my non-Americans have to understand that a significant segment of out society is anti-government and anti-science.  This animas started with the Reagan Administration.

According to some of the polls I have seen 40% of Americans do not believe in Darwin.  The appearance of the Coronavirus is the result of evolution and they do not believe in it.  I have a niece who told me dinosaurs were not real.  Fossils were planted by the devil to mislead man from the true word of God.

We in the United States are now paying the price for this ignorance.  We have many scientist and leaders who are aware of the problem and are fighting an uphill struggle with the enlighten geniuses who support Trump.  In the end, among the industrialized world, we will suffer the most from this catastrophe.

Hmm yes, many people don't get that science is a very careful and methodical search for facts rather than just another competing belief system :-\.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 31, 2020, 12:14:27 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 30, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120666809/do-the-consequences-of-this-lockdown-really-match-the-threat

The figures of up to 900 deaths a day in Italy are alarming, and so is the nation's crude case-fatality rate of 9 per cent. However, a recent analysis of the deaths in Italy shows that only a small fraction were entirely due to Covid-19, occurring in people with no co-morbidities (3 out of 355; 0.8 per cent). Many deaths were hastily labelled as Covid-19 related when they were not.


How do you know that, Mr. Thornley?

If you mean that the vast majority of people who died had pre-existing grave conditions, this is true but doesn't make their death any less related to Covid-19. They would have surely died some time in the rather near future compared to healthy people but there's no certitude they would have died this time of this year even if they didn't get Covid-19. So yes, the deaths are Covid-19 related. These people were not killed by their cancer, or diabetes, or heart diseases, they were killed by Covid-19 severely aggravating them.

We don't want to squash a flea with a sledgehammer and bring the house down.

If Mr. Thornley thinks that what we have now is just a flea in a house then I have no more comments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 31, 2020, 01:41:50 AM
Quote from: Holden on March 30, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
I know I said I'd only post humour but this makes interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/120666809/do-the-consequences-of-this-lockdown-really-match-the-threat

I found this very peculiar...

Death rate comparable to the flu? And the fact that population of Italy has more elderly, creates a bias in the average age of deceased  in comparison to other countries. Mostly elderly yes, but not all. And the young or middle aged might survive but their health can be seriously affected.

The coronavirus death rate in the US is far higher than that of the flu — here's how the 2 compare across age ranges (https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-compared-seasonal-flu-in-the-us-death-rates-2020-3?international=true&r=US&IR=T)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 04:26:14 AM
My daughter said she's not coughing this morning and feeling much better. I know that the virus can come and go but this sounds encouraging. Thanks to all who expressed interest/concern and hope you all keep safe and well.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 31, 2020, 04:43:15 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 04:26:14 AM
My daughter said she's not coughing this morning and feeling much better. I know that the virus can come and go but this sounds encouraging. Thanks to all who expressed interest/concern and hope you all keep safe and well.
:)

Even as an outsider, one couldn't help noticing the posts; so good to read those news.

...............................................................................................

From a different place, with a very different 'approach', detestable and bizarre, the ruler of Turkmenistan has simply forbidden mentioning the virus-word
https://rsf.org/en/news/turkmenistan-bans-word-coronavirus


In Europe, Lukashenko in Belaruss also tries to downplay it, but to a lesser degree
https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/europe/article/show/belarus-unorthodox-corona-response-4193/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 05:19:40 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 31, 2020, 04:43:15 AM
Even as an outsider, one couldn't help noticing the posts; so good to read those news.

...............................................................................................

From a different place, with a very different 'approach', detestable and bizarre, the ruler of Turkmenistan has simply forbidden mentioning the virus-word
https://rsf.org/en/news/turkmenistan-bans-word-coronavirus


In Europe, Lukashenko in Belaruss also tries to downplay it, but to a lesser degree
https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/europe/article/show/belarus-unorthodox-corona-response-4193/

Thank you  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 31, 2020, 05:29:14 AM
I'm late in commenting, vandermolen, but just wanted to say I'm glad your daughter is feeling better!

Warm regards from Madrid,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 31, 2020, 05:48:18 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 04:26:14 AM
My daughter said she's not coughing this morning and feeling much better. I know that the virus can come and go but this sounds encouraging. Thanks to all who expressed interest/concern and hope you all keep safe and well.
:)

Excellent news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on March 31, 2020, 06:17:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 31, 2020, 05:48:18 AM
Excellent news!

Indeed!  Here's hoping for more of it!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 31, 2020, 06:41:54 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 04:26:14 AM
My daughter said she's not coughing this morning and feeling much better. I know that the virus can come and go but this sounds encouraging. Thanks to all who expressed interest/concern and hope you all keep safe and well.
:)

With all the positive vibes how could she not? Great news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 31, 2020, 06:47:03 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 04:26:14 AM
My daughter said she's not coughing this morning and feeling much better. I know that the virus can come and go but this sounds encouraging. Thanks to all who expressed interest/concern and hope you all keep safe and well.
:)

Good to hear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 06:56:48 AM
Quote from: Que on March 31, 2020, 01:41:50 AM
I found this very peculiar...

Death rate comparable to the flu? And the fact that population of Italy has more elderly, creates a bias in the average age of deceased  in comparison to other countries. Mostly elderly yes, but not all. And the young or middle aged might survive but their health can be seriously affected.

The coronavirus death rate in the US is far higher than that of the flu — here's how the 2 compare across age ranges (https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-compared-seasonal-flu-in-the-us-death-rates-2020-3?international=true&r=US&IR=T)

Q

     (https://i.insider.com/5e81f6460c2a6261b1771b05?width=700&format=jpeg&auto=webp)

During the 2018-19 flu season, about 35 million people in the US contracted the flu and about 34,000 died, according to the CDC. The agency estimates the total number of flu infections in the US via its influenza-surveillance system, which gathers flu data from state and local partners and projects nationwide totals using infectious-disease models.


     The difference between a 0.1% fatality rate and a 1-2% corona virus rate is that to produce the same number of deaths you only need 1.75-3.5 million infected.

     Variation among countries tells me that some countries will have lower death rates based on the age of the population and how well the older component has been protected at an early stage of the pandemic.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 31, 2020, 07:42:05 AM
Thanks for all the good wishes about my daughter. They mean a lot to me.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 09:44:08 AM

     4 Boston Hospitals Report Significant Number Of Employees Have Coronavirus (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/30/824170756/four-boston-hospitals-report-significant-numbers-of-employees-have-the-coronavir)

Four of Boston's largest and best-known hospitals said on Monday that in all, 345 of their employees have tested positive for the coronavirus, putting additional pressure on the area's already stretched medical resources.

Massachusetts General Hospital confirmed to NPR on Monday afternoon that 115 of its staff members have tested positive for COVID-19; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center told NPR on Monday afternoon that it has 62 employees who have tested positive for the coronavirus. Additionally, Boston television station WBZ reported Monday that Tufts Medical Center has 61 employees who have tested positive.

Additionally, a WBZ reporter stated on Monday afternoon that Brigham and Women's Hospital said that it had 107 employees who were positive for COVID-19.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 31, 2020, 10:01:12 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 06:56:48 AM
     (https://i.insider.com/5e81f6460c2a6261b1771b05?width=700&format=jpeg&auto=webp)

During the 2018-19 flu season, about 35 million people in the US contracted the flu and about 34,000 died, according to the CDC. The agency estimates the total number of flu infections in the US via its influenza-surveillance system, which gathers flu data from state and local partners and projects nationwide totals using infectious-disease models.


     The difference between a 0.1% fatality rate and a 1-2% corona virus rate is that to produce the same number of deaths you only need 1.75-3.5 million infected.

     Variation among countries tells me that some countries will have lower death rates based on the age of the population and how well the older component has been protected at an early stage of the pandemic.

   
Ugh. The putting 12% at the top instead of 100% to make it seem more dramatic is so distasteful. 😑
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 10:29:24 AM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 10:01:12 AM
Ugh. The putting 12% at the top instead of 100% to make it seem more dramatic is so distasteful. 😑

     For comparative purposes 12% is about right. If you like you can scale to 100 for the leftmost column (like using "1986 dollars" for inflation estimates).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 31, 2020, 11:38:48 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 30, 2020, 03:57:26 PM
Definitive numbers are of course not available. But the consensus seems to be that the novel coronavirus has a transmission rate (R0) of about 3, meaning each infected person gives to 3 people on average. For the flu (including the 1918 pandemic flu) the corresponding number is more like 1.5.

For seasonal flu, mortality (percentage of infected patients who die) is about 0.1%. For the novel coronavirus it seems to be 1-2%, which would give it comparable mortality to the 1918 pandemic flu.
Interesting.  I thought that l had last heard that it was something like 3 times easier to catch than the flu?   :-\  Will have to look into it further, but thank you for your thoughts and the information.   :)

Managed to (mostly) forget about it for a while today; after grocery shopping in very strange circumstances, went for a walk for a couple of hours....ahhh...peace!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on March 31, 2020, 11:57:45 AM
The Spanish flu had a mortality of 3% or slightly higher.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on March 31, 2020, 12:19:32 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 10:01:12 AM
Ugh. The putting 12% at the top instead of 100% to make it seem more dramatic is so distasteful. 😑

A graph should be scaled to display the dynamic range of the data. Reasonable practice is to use the smallest round number that encloses the data. A suppressed zero can be considered deceptive under some circumstances, but I don't see why every percentage graph has to be plotted with a 100% limit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on March 31, 2020, 12:34:27 PM
100 coronavirus cases aboard U.S. Navy aircraft carrier:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Exclusive-Captain-of-aircraft-carrier-with-15167883.php
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 31, 2020, 12:38:45 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on March 31, 2020, 12:19:32 PM
A graph should be scaled to display the dynamic range of the data. Reasonable practice is to use the smallest round number that encloses the data. A suppressed zero can be considered deceptive under some circumstances, but I don't see why every percentage graph has to be plotted with a 100% limit.
It might be made as a genuine comparison alone, so it could be without criticism.

But another thing is the rightmost part is not the same- comparing 65+ to 85+ and two other categories. If they just did a 65+ category on the right side, like they did the left side, it would only be less than 6% combined. Not quite as dramatic.

Also I don't really like comparison charts like these scaled this way because the only motive could be to shoot down others arguments "it's just like the flu". It doesn't show the big picture or put things into perspective with this scaling, only potentially freaks people even though me and most others only have a .1% chance of dying from it, if we even got it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 02:16:40 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 12:38:45 PM
It might be made as a genuine comparison alone, so it could be without criticism.

But another thing is the rightmost part is not the same- comparing 65+ to 85+ and two other categories. If they just did a 65+ category on the right side, like they did the left side, it would only be less than 6% combined. Not quite as dramatic.

Also I don't really like comparison charts like these scaled this way because the only motive could be to shoot down others arguments "it's just like the flu". It doesn't show the big picture or put things into perspective with this scaling, only potentially freaks people even though me and most others only have a .1% chance of dying from it, if we even got it.

     The chart does reveal how unlike the flu it is. That stands out clearly because the chart is scaled to reveal the difference. If this shoots down a "just like the flu" argument, it does so legitimately.

     I'm in the 2.7% column on account of being too old for my own good. Oddly, I don't care whether some chartmaker is motivated to freak me out or has some other motive like promoting a New New World Order.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 31, 2020, 03:21:01 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 02:16:40 PM
I'm in the 2.7% column on account of being too old for my own good. Oddly, I don't care whether some chartmaker is motivated to freak me out or has some other motive like promoting a New New World Order.

But as far as I see it - and have pointed to before -, this column comprises all the people in that age group without correction for other complicating diseases, and as such it is at best useless and at worst misleading.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 31, 2020, 03:24:38 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 02:16:40 PM
     The chart does reveal how unlike the flu it is. That stands out clearly because the chart is scaled to reveal the difference. If this shoots down a "just like the flu" argument, it does so legitimately.

     I'm in the 2.7% column on account of being too old for my own good. Oddly, I don't care whether some chartmaker is motivated to freak me out or has some other motive like promoting a New New World Order.
I also think everyone pretty much intuitively scales graphs like these to 100% by default (because 0-100% is the spectrum of all possibilities). You have to take a second to sort of really zoom out, which often people won't even do and instead just react emotionally.

There could be an upside- show this to old people who get duped easily from scams because their mind is rotting away, and they will be extra motivated to not be around people. Hopefully that was the intent.
 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 31, 2020, 04:15:14 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 12:38:45 PM
It might be made as a genuine comparison alone, so it could be without criticism.

But another thing is the rightmost part is not the same- comparing 65+ to 85+ and two other categories. If they just did a 65+ category on the right side, like they did the left side, it would only be less than 6% combined. Not quite as dramatic.

Also I don't really like comparison charts like these scaled this way because the only motive could be to shoot down others arguments "it's just like the flu". It doesn't show the big picture or put things into perspective with this scaling, only potentially freaks people even though me and most others only have a .1% chance of dying from it, if we even got it.

The reason there is an 85+ category for today and it only goes to 65+ on the 1918 side is that the 85+ category, for all intents and purposes, didn't exist in 1918, when the average life expectancy was in the low 50s. The scaling is accurate, the percentages are right there, and including the empty space between 12% and 100% would just obscure the relevant data. More specifically, the graph needs to be able to illustrate graphically the difference between .1 and .5 percent — which means the relevant scale for the graph, if one wishes to illustrate the whole range of possible percentages, is not 1-100, but 1-1,000. The scale as it stands now is 1-120. 

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 04:22:38 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 31, 2020, 03:21:01 PM
But as far as I see it - and have pointed to before -, this column comprises all the people in that age group without correction for other complicating diseases, and as such it is at best useless and at worst misleading.

     I don't think that correction is needed any more than you need to be reminded that all those young people who aren't dying are in the aggregate very healthy.

     It comes down to this IMV, the age differences contain the health differences. Even most 80 year olds survive the virus, somewhere between 85-90%. It's in the aggregate, not the individual, that age matters. For a personal assessment I can use my fantastical super health to de-age myself. Yeah, let's do that. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 31, 2020, 04:26:32 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 31, 2020, 04:15:14 PM
The reason there is an 85+ category for today and it only goes to 65+ on the 1918 side is that the 85+ category, for all intents and purposes, didn't exist in 1918, when the average life expectancy was in the low 50s.
Are we talking about the same chart? It says 2018-2019 flu season, so was assuming it was about that year.


Quote from: BasilValentine on March 31, 2020, 04:15:14 PM
The scaling is accurate, the percentages are right there, and including the empty space between 12% and 100% would just obscure the relevant data.
I mean... technically not if the chart were big enough and you can see the difference still.
But I'm not the chartmaker, so it's probably fine for whatever their intent was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 04:33:23 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 03:24:38 PM
I also think everyone pretty much intuitively scales graphs like these to 100% by default (because 0-100% is the spectrum of all possibilities).
 

     I have no interest in mere possibilities. It's possible that the virus is spread by crab men from planet Mongo. It would be just like them to do it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 31, 2020, 04:38:32 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 04:33:23 PM
     I have no interest in mere possibilities. It's possible that the virus is spread by crab men from planet Mongo. It would be just like them to do it.
No, actually the current theory, which is much more likely, is that it was spread from Mongo men from the planet Crab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 05:11:54 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 04:38:32 PM
No, actually the current theory, which is much more likely, is that it was spread from Mongo men from the planet Crab.

      The Crab Nebula, you mean? Yeah, I can see that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 31, 2020, 05:26:01 PM

     Massachusetts deaths suddenly jumped from 56 to 89. It's like it came out of nowhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 31, 2020, 05:27:06 PM
Quote from: greg on March 31, 2020, 04:26:32 PM
Are we talking about the same chart? It says 2018-2019 flu season, so was assuming it was about that year.

I mean... technically not if the chart were big enough and you can see the difference still.
But I'm not the chartmaker, so it's probably fine for whatever their intent was.

Oops, right you are. But the scaling comment stands.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 31, 2020, 10:37:00 PM
Gentlemen, I have learned from a reliable source that Trump blames the Easter Bunny for the virus.  The Bunny feels that he is overworked so he created a phony virus scandal that would cancel Easter so he would not have to show up for the egg roll at the White House this year  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 31, 2020, 11:36:40 PM
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/?fbclid=IwAR3jL1kn74uF95hvPlWT8Nt4CzLwX7bY4tqsdqjq9ENlcY7OQjCvsfM9jK0

This looks like a contrarian assessment of what's happening. How balanced is it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 12:48:43 AM
"Off-Guardian"?

Wondering who they are I'm led to this article:

How I Produce Fake News for Russia (https://worldbeyondwar.org/produce-fake-news-russia/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2020, 12:52:07 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 31, 2020, 11:36:40 PM
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/?fbclid=IwAR3jL1kn74uF95hvPlWT8Nt4CzLwX7bY4tqsdqjq9ENlcY7OQjCvsfM9jK0

This looks like a contrarian assessment of what's happening. How balanced is it?

There are some good points but also some plain bullshit, surprisingly so (or maybe not, just another reminder that scientists are human themselves) coming from people with such impeccable scientific credentials. For instance, this:

Quote from: Dr Michael Levitt, Professor of biochemistry at Stanford University, 2013 Nobel Prize for ChemistryThere is a lot of unjustified panic in Israel. I don't believe the numbers here, everything is politics, not math. I will be surprised if number of deaths in Israel surpasses ten, and even five now with the restrictions.

Well, according to the today's edition of Haaretz: Coronavirus in Israel: Death Toll Rises to 21 as Cases Surge Above 5,500  (https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/coronavirus-israel-netanyahu-breaking-news-1.8720108). That is, two if not four times Dr. Levitt's estimation and counting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 01, 2020, 12:54:09 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 12:48:43 AM
"Off-Guardian"?

Wondering who they are I'm led to this article:

How I Produce Fake News for Russia (https://worldbeyondwar.org/produce-fake-news-russia/)

Ahhh!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 12:59:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 01, 2020, 12:54:09 AM
Ahhh!

The title is misleading, but it does say that site is on some list of misinformation. Though I haven't followed up on that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 05:39:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 31, 2020, 11:36:40 PM
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/?fbclid=IwAR3jL1kn74uF95hvPlWT8Nt4CzLwX7bY4tqsdqjq9ENlcY7OQjCvsfM9jK0

This looks like a contrarian assessment of what's happening. How balanced is it?

It's important to consider contrarian views. There is a lot of uncertainty, and no obviously correct path. These snippets do not convince me we have grossly over estimated the risk, but I will continue to look at contrary opinion. Thanks for the link.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 01, 2020, 05:52:34 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 05:39:01 AMIt's important to consider contrarian views.

Depends. A lot of them are contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 06:42:39 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 01, 2020, 05:52:34 AM
Depends. A lot of them are contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.
Probably why the word "consider" is in that sentence.

I'd consider flat earth conspiracy for about 2 seconds, then say it's stupid.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 07:29:06 AM

     
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 06:42:39 AM

I'd consider flat earth conspiracy for about 2 seconds, then say it's stupid.  :D

     That's why you're so admired here. Every 2 seconds you have a new idea. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 08:31:53 AM

     One of the comments from the article is this:

In the majority of cases, COVID-19 takes the form of a mild cold or is even symptom-free. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that all cases of infection are recorded, in contrast with deaths which are almost completely recorded. This leads to an overestimation of the CFR.

According to a study of 565 Japanese people evacuated from Wuhan, all of whom were tested (regardless of symptoms), only 9.2% of infected people were detected with currently used symptom-oriented COVID-19 monitoring [5]. This would mean that the number of infected people is likely to be about 10 times greater than the number of registered cases. The CFR would then only be about one tenth of that currently measured. Others assume an even higher number of unreported cases, which would further reduce the CFR.


The media is currently communicating raw data, for example, there have been "X" infected persons and "Y" deaths to date. However, this presentation fails to distinguish between diagnoses and infections.

     This is not contrarian. The distinction between confirmed cases and infection estimates is both widely discussed and to some extent ignored.

     Regardless of the disturbing one day jump in deaths in Massachusetts, I am finding it hard to reconcile the slowdown in death rates with the 100,000-240,000 total coming from the WH.

     Once we get a handle on the total number of infected in the population I expect some of what are called contrarian views to turn out to be right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2020, 08:52:24 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 08:31:53 AM
     One of the comments from the article is this:

In the majority of cases, COVID-19 takes the form of a mild cold or is even symptom-free. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that all cases of infection are recorded, in contrast with deaths which are almost completely recorded. This leads to an overestimation of the CFR.

According to a study of 565 Japanese people evacuated from Wuhan, all of whom were tested (regardless of symptoms), only 9.2% of infected people were detected with currently used symptom-oriented COVID-19 monitoring [5]. This would mean that the number of infected people is likely to be about 10 times greater than the number of registered cases. The CFR would then only be about one tenth of that currently measured. Others assume an even higher number of unreported cases, which would further reduce the CFR.


The media is currently communicating raw data, for example, there have been "X" infected persons and "Y" deaths to date. However, this presentation fails to distinguish between diagnoses and infections.

     This is not contrarian. The distinction between confirmed cases and infection estimates is both widely discussed and to some extent ignored.
   

That's one of the good points I was referring to. Obviously, in any given country the number of infected people is larger than the number of confirmed cases (I don't know whether 10 times greater is an accurate estimate, though) and consequently the real death rate is smaller than X deaths to Y confirmed cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 09:57:26 AM

     Which 3 countries with a case total above 5,000 have the lowest rate of new cases?

     China, S. Korea and Italy have the lowest growth rates.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 09:59:12 AM
Anyone who can accurately calculate the mortality of Covid 19 should write it up. It will be the cover story for Nature.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 10:29:30 AM
This is worth a watch. There is a suspect for Patient Zero, and the CCP tried to deny it but without proof. The Lady has sort of just disappeared apparently.

The theory is also slightly different... it involves the researchers doing field studies on the cause of coronaviruses within bats right before the breakout, and that's when she disappears.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQFCcSI0pU
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 10:44:53 AM
     
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 09:59:12 AM
Anyone who can accurately calculate the mortality of Covid 19 should write it up. It will be the cover story for Nature.

     I'd like to see a large scale experiment using the antibody test to discover the extent of herd immunity.

     Pence says the US is like Italy. I think he's right, though I'm not sure he understands what that means.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 10:50:01 AM

     
(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com%2F8d05cac0-73f0-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 11:27:12 AM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 10:29:30 AM
This is worth a watch. There is a suspect for Patient Zero, and the CCP tried to deny it but without proof. The Lady has sort of just disappeared apparently.

The theory is also slightly different... it involves the researchers doing field studies on the cause of coronaviruses within bats right before the breakout, and that's when she disappears.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQFCcSI0pU
Ok, just rewatched this and it also mentions that the other lab researchers were self-quarantining already because they got infected from the bats. While they were doing studies on them about coronaviruses.

Seems the market story just isn't true then? Who made up that story then?

You know the CCP is now claiming it came from Italy or the US...


(btw none of this is conspiracy, it's actual research- in mainstream news stories they say it's from the market while providing zero evidence).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 11:39:44 AM


     The conspiracy theories about the origins of the coronavirus, debunked (https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 12:28:27 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 11:39:44 AM

     The conspiracy theories about the origins of the coronavirus, debunked (https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab)
If this is supposed to be a response to my post, I don't see any connection...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 12:36:54 PM


     You did say:

Quote(btw none of this is conspiracy, it's actual research- in mainstream news stories they say it's from the market while providing zero evidence).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 01, 2020, 12:44:47 PM
Why does modern man seem to always need to find someone to blame for everything, usually someone there was animosity to even before the event? Just asking...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 12:49:23 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 01, 2020, 12:44:47 PM
Why does modern man seem to always need to find someone to blame for everything, usually someone there was animosity to even before the event? Just asking...

    It's probably witchcraft. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 01, 2020, 12:51:00 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 11:27:12 AM
(btw none of this is conspiracy, it's actual research- in mainstream news stories they say it's from the market while providing zero evidence).

They are reporting the opinion of CDC virologists that travel to China to participate in the investigation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:01:02 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 12:36:54 PM

     You did say:
Where's the evidence in the article? Scientists speculating it was from the market?

Imo there's not much difference between bats being eaten at a market or bats peeing on researchers in a lab. In fact, the latter is actually far more innocent.


Quote from: ritter on April 01, 2020, 12:44:47 PM
Why does modern man seem to always need to find someone to blame for everything, usually someone there was animosity to even before the event? Just asking...
To prevent stuff from happening again, maybe?...
(and nothing modern about that)


Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 01, 2020, 12:51:00 PM
They are reporting the opinion of CDC virologists that travel to China to participate in the investigation.
Opinion is the key word... the market and the lab are so close that it would be impossible to tell where it came from without documentation. And the primary sources for it it is online. There would be no record of what people eat at the market.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 01, 2020, 01:05:37 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:01:02 PM

To prevent stuff from happening again, maybe?...
(and nothing modern about that)

A bit of a non sequitur there, I'm afraid...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:08:00 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 12:28:27 PM
If this is supposed to be a response to my post, I don't see any connection...

It is because if YouTube Guy wants to sway us to his conspiracy theory - sorry: "research" - he needs to explain why the entire global scientific community are leaning towards a different explanation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:16:46 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:08:00 PM
It is because if YouTube Guy wants to sway us to his conspiracy theory - sorry: "research" - he needs to explain why the entire global scientific community are leaning towards a different explanation.
Predictable response from you.

You didn't watch the video, obviously. Literally no points of debate given. Not a conspiracy, and you didn't offer any counterarguments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 01:22:53 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:01:02 PM


Opinion is the key word... the market and the lab are so close that it would be impossible to tell where it came from without documentation. And the primary sources for it it is online. There would be no record of what people eat at the market.

     The researchers don't get their findings from online. The animal market hypothesis is highly probable and consistent with evidence from previous similar viruses.

     We don't have to speculate about what people eat from the animal markets. It's not a secret.

     One thing we know is this virus is newly discovered and no lab was working on it prior to the outbreak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:31:31 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 01:22:53 PM
We don't have to speculate about what people eat from the animal markets. It's not a secret.
I don't mean in general. I mean patient zero.
There's not going to be a record of specific purchases, so it's just a guess then (a very good, believable one).
But compare that to hard evidence of:


Quote from: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 01:22:53 PM
     One thing we know is this virus is newly discovered and no lab was working on it prior to the outbreak.
That lab was studying bats with coronaviruses right before the outbreak. The video explains that, along with the job postings for that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:37:49 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:16:46 PM
Predictable response from you.

You didn't watch the video, obviously. Literally no points of debate given. Not a conspiracy, and you didn't offer any counterarguments.

I did watch it. He says its suspicious that the lab had job openings around this time and that one lab worker cant be found. He says the job description says "we've discovered this new and terrible virus", but the all too quick screen grab says nothing of the sort - like a job description would say that anyway. He says you can no longer check his research and conclusions because all the info has been disappeared by the government. That's conspiracy theory not research - which at any rate seems to have been done exclusively on Google, and contradicts investigative reporters from around the world who are doing on the ground interviewing. Typical Youtube bobblehead amateur no-oversight or in-house verification and cross-checking "news", then. "Research" is something that gets printed in full with methodology explained so it can be examined in full and tested and verified.

I didn't offer any counterargument, because the counterargument is the global consensus of the scientific community, who despite all their differences are all reaching the same conclusions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:48:55 PM
The counterargument is that it wasn't genetically altered, right?

Just because bats were in a lab doesn't mean it was genetically altered. What in the official story actually disproves that patient zero was a lab researcher there? And/or proves that they were someone who ate an animal at the market instead?

There's wet markets all over Asia. Of course viruses come from there but are there always labs nearby studying bat viruses? That is one very big coincidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:51:40 PM
Quote from: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:48:55 PM
That is one very big coincidence.

Conspiracy Theory 101
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 01:53:48 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:51:40 PM
Conspiracy Theory 101
Ok... any counter arguments?


It's literally comparing guesses. No guess of a motive is offered, so no conspiracy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 02:01:15 PM
I don't have access to the data that the global scientific community does - nor the education in that field I'd need to process it. But I trust their collective analysis of it, especially as they're all reaching the same conclusions. I don't believe at all that they're merely "guessing", they may be dealing in probabilities and likelihoods but thats not the same as mere guessing. Certainly I trust them over Youtube Guy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 01, 2020, 02:08:28 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 01:51:40 PM
Conspiracy Theory 101

(* chortle *)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 01, 2020, 02:18:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 02:01:15 PM
I don't have access to the data that the global scientific community does - nor the education in that field I'd need to process it. But I trust their collective analysis of it, especially as they're all reaching the same conclusions. I don't believe at all that they're merely "guessing", they may be dealing in probabilities and likelihoods but thats not the same as mere guessing. Certainly I trust them over Youtube Guy.
You have a problem with trusting authority a bit too much without questioning anything. Being a conspiracy theorist is bad, but you gotta find some balance. Mixed with disdain for the "little guy" is not quite a good look imo.

You do realize that the official story and this story could be true at the same time?

They both got the bats from the same place, I think. The virus was already in the bats. When they are eaten or the bats bleed or pee on people is when transmission occurs.

And yes, they are also guessing until they find patient zero.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 01, 2020, 02:30:28 PM

     Massachusetts got whomped again today with another 33 deaths, so the total is 122.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 04:07:46 PM
Coronavirus: What misinformation has spread in Africa? (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-51710617)

"African countries are experiencing a rise in the number of new coronavirus cases, and many governments are now enforcing strict social distancing measures.

As they prepare for a surge in cases, misleading information has been spreading throughout the continent.

1. Vaccines aren't being tested on Africans

There are widely-shared social media posts claiming that African people are to be used as guinea pigs to test a new coronavirus vaccine. However, such claims are false - there is no vaccine for Covid-19 and only a number of clinical trials are taking place, none of them currently in African countries.

We're not sure where these claims originate from but they tend to focus on how African people will be given the vaccine to test it's safe for use in Western nations.

One of them includes a YouTube video of a woman speaking in French saying: "There is now a vaccine to vaccinate ALL Africans but none for Western countries, so I'm pleading with my African brothers and sisters not to take this vaccine." It currently has over 20,000 views, with many social media users offering support in their comments on the clip.

Another YouTube video is making similar claims that the vaccine will be used on African people to test if it's safe before being used in wealthier countries.

Fears about vaccines are not uncommon in some communities where there is a distrust of modern medicine. In French-speaking Africa, where rumours about the Covid-19 vaccine have spread, there were similar concerns and misinformation about the Ebola vaccine, a treatment that has contributed to tackling the disease.

2. Black skin isn't resistant to Covid-19

There have been persistent suggestions on social media about skin colour and resistance to the illness.

On 13 March the Kenyan health minister dismissed the rumours that "those with black skin cannot get coronavirus".

We spoke to Professor Thumbi Ndung'u from the Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine in Durban who said "there is absolutely no evidence to back up the idea - and indeed, we know that people with black skin are getting infected."

3. A cup of black tea does not cure coronavirus

Keeping hydrated is important for your health, but drinking black tea is not a cure or treatment for Covid-19 as has been claimed.

According to local Kenyan media reports, people there have been receiving phone calls advising them to drink tea to avoid the coronavirus - and that if they didn't they might die from the illness.

It's a myth that has been spread elsewhere and has no medical basis.

but the expectation is that one won't be ready until at least the middle of next year.

4. No, you don't need to shave your beard to protect against the virus

An old graphic created by the US health authorities about facial hair and respirators has been used incorrectly to suggest men should shave off their beards to avoid catching the coronavirus.

The Nigerian Punch newspaper's headline said: "To be safe from coronavirus, shave your beard, CDC warns"

The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) image shows dozens of examples of facial hair and which ones to avoid when wearing a respirator mask.

Beard styles such as Side Whiskers and the Zappa are approved but the Garibaldi and French Fork can interfere with the valve and prevent the respirator working properly.

The graphic is genuine - but it was created in 2017 (well before the coronavirus outbreak) for workers who wear tight-fitting respirators. Contrary to what's been reported, the CDC has not published it recently and it does not recommend that people shave off their beards.

Similar headlines have appeared in other countries, generating thousands of shares. Australian news outlet 7News posted on Twitter: "How your beard may unknowingly increase your risk of coronavirus."

Current UK health advice is that while masks are useful for medical staff in hospitals, "there is very little evidence of widespread benefit for members of the public".

5. Nigerian preacher fighting coronavirus

An evangelical preacher who claims he can cure the virus has also been the subject of disinformation.

Stories about David Kingleo Elijah, from the Glorious Mount of Possibility Church started spreading online after a video of him saying he would move to China to "destroy" the virus was uploaded on YouTube and shared on other platforms.

"I am going prophetically to destroy coronavirus. I am going to China, I want to destroy coronavirus," he says in the video.

A few days later, reports appeared in blogs alleging that he had travelled to China but had been admitted to hospital after contracting the virus. The blogs refer to the pastor under a different name - Elija Emeka Chibuke.

The photo used to show him in hospital is actually a photo of Adeshina Adesanya, a Nigerian actor popularly known as Pastor Ajidara, who died in hospital in 2017.

6. Drinking pepper soup is not a cure.

In Nigeria, a preacher posted a video and a poster claiming that pepper soup is a cure for coronavirus. The claim was also shared on WhatsApp.

There is no cure or specific treatment for coronavirus and the claim gives few details about the medicinal properties of pepper soup - a traditional spicy Nigerian dish.

The WHO says the outbreak has caused an "infodemic" of false and misleading information.

In Cape Verde, the tiny Portuguese-speaking West African nation, a post spread on social media claiming that a Brazilian doctor had recommended fennel tea as a cure for coronavirus. It prompted a rush for the herb in local markets, reported AFP.

The Brazilian health ministry has warned people not to share an article suggesting fennel as a cure for coronavirus.

The World Health Organization says that thorough and regular hand-washing is crucial in the fight to avoid infection."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 01, 2020, 04:43:14 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 01, 2020, 04:07:46 PM
3. A cup of black tea does not cure coronavirus

The Kinks wouldn't lie!

https://www.youtube.com/v/lw6qxDPmOGM

Tea in the morning, tea in the evening, tea at supper Time,
You get tea when it's raining, tea when it's snowing.
Tea when the weather's fine,
You get tea as a mid-day stimulant
You get tea with your afternoon tea
For any old ailment or disease
For Christ sake have a cuppa tea.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 01, 2020, 05:44:14 PM
A cup of black tea will not cure the virus, but that's no reason not to have a cup of black tea.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 05:50:03 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 01, 2020, 05:44:14 PM
A cup of black tea will not cure the virus, but that's no reason not to have a cup of black tea.
Green tea is even less likely to cure the virus, so might be the better choice.

When I was in my 20s I drank only black tea. In my 30s I developed a taste for the demon rumcoffee. In recent years, mostly green tea. So much easier on the stomach and one can infuse the leaves more than once.

But loose tea only. Tea bags are for desperate situations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 02, 2020, 12:16:11 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 01, 2020, 05:50:03 PM
Green tea is even less likely to cure the virus, so might be the better choice.

When I was in my 20s I drank only black tea. In my 30s I developed a taste for the demon rumcoffee. In recent years, mostly green tea. So much easier on the stomach and one can infuse the leaves more than once.

But loose tea only. Tea bags are for desperate situations.

I'm also a green tea drinker! Green tea has a more subtle flavour, is indeed easier in the stomach (less caffeine) and.... your teeth are significantly less stained in comparison to black tea. A bit of milk mitigates some of these downsides of black tea - the Brits know what they are doing.  :D

On topic: watching CNN last night gave me the impression that the situation in the US is getting dire...  ::)

Here in the Netherlands the big question is if the expanded IC capacity will hold, while the duration of the stay of patients in IC turned out to be longer than anticipated and the number of patients is heading for a peak.
Fortunately there are the first signs of a rapid slowing down of the epidemic, with a reduced estimated infection rate of 0,3.

Q

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 02, 2020, 04:02:19 AM
Multiple stories of sanitary material hijacked or stolen by Americans, Israelis. Plane loads of masks purchased by France ready to leave the tarmac purchased cash by Americans and sent to the US. Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati. Israel tasking Mosad to get material by all possible means.

European media extremely critical of the USA. Not a word of these stories appear in US media.


https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html (https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html)

https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html (https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html)

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805 (https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 04:28:44 AM
Here's a great, heart-warming story about how much we can really get done if we choose to all work together.  Heard this on NPR this morning:  https://www.npr.org/2020/04/02/825800514/planet-money-the-parable-of-the-piston
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2020, 04:30:07 AM
Quote from: André on April 02, 2020, 04:02:19 AM
Multiple stories of sanitary material hijacked or stolen by Americans, Israelis. Plane loads of masks purchased by France ready to leave the tarmac purchased cash by Americans and sent to the US. Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati. Israel tasking Mosad to get material by all possible means.

European media extremely critical of the USA. Not a word of these stories appear in US media.


https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html (https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html)

https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html (https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html)

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805 (https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805)



Yeesh!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2020, 04:30:36 AM
Georgia now sheltering-in-place:

https://www.earrelevant.net/2020/04/gov-kemp-announces-statewide-shelter-in-place-order-for-georgia/?fbclid=IwAR1DdllkZwCaFLBRoJaLsWYPDpi3gNq5qw1_SODwjJiOtMOik4mwui-dd4Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 04:40:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 02, 2020, 04:30:07 AM
Yeesh!
I don't know these sources?  How reliable are they?

I'm sure that there have been bidding wars for items; I had mentioned earlier about how states bidding against each other has been driving up the prices.  I could certainly see how that would also happen between nations too.

Our government really should have taken the initiative early on to come up with a plan and coordinate manufacturing of needed supplies...and work with other countries too.  Do listen to that NPR story.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 06:29:36 AM
Quote from: André on April 02, 2020, 04:02:19 AM
Multiple stories of sanitary material hijacked or stolen by Americans, Israelis. Plane loads of masks purchased by France ready to leave the tarmac purchased cash by Americans and sent to the US. Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati. Israel tasking Mosad to get material by all possible means.

European media extremely critical of the USA. Not a word of these stories appear in US media.


https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html (https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html)

https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html (https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html)

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805 (https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805)
Hi André,

Where did you see this story?  "Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati."

I've been trying for some time to pull it up, but so far no luck.  Confused too:  you said *"lands in Montreal" and then followed by it being re-routed by DHL.  So, do you mean that after it had landed on Canadian soil, that it was then instructed not to dock there and unload the supplies and instead take off and fly to Cincinnati?

*or do you mean that it was supposed to have landed in Montreal?  Translation/languages are difficult I know; I make errors all the time--even in my own language!  ;)

Best wishes,

PD



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on April 02, 2020, 07:16:00 AM
Quote from: André on April 02, 2020, 04:02:19 AM
Multiple stories of sanitary material hijacked or stolen by Americans, Israelis. Plane loads of masks purchased by France ready to leave the tarmac purchased cash by Americans and sent to the US. Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati. Israel tasking Mosad to get material by all possible means.

European media extremely critical of the USA. Not a word of these stories appear in US media.


https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html (https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-mossad-coronavirus-test-kits.html)

https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html (https://www.en24.news/i24/2020/04/coronavirus-a-shipment-of-masks-from-china-destined-for-france-hijacked-by-americans.html)

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805 (https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/04/01/une-commande-francaise-de-masques-detournee-vers-les-etats-unis-sur-un-tarmac-chinois_1783805)
And all these news from yesterday, hmmm...  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2020, 07:22:13 AM
Thanks to Trump, the coronavirus is very much not under control in the USA

On February 24, President Trump tweeted, 'The coronavirus is very much under control in the USA.' It wasn't.

"I want every American to be prepared for the hard days that lie ahead. We're going to go through a very tough two weeks."

With these words, on Tuesday afternoon, President Trump sounded a new and welcomed tone on the coronavirus.

But make no mistake, hard days lie ahead because of the president's botched, selfish, and incompetent response to the coronavirus crisis. A change in tone can't change that catastrophic reality.

Trump's calls for vigilance are a bit like declaring it's time to close the barn doors after the horses have escaped — and the barn is on fire and it's threatening to burn the entire farm down.

Tens of thousands of Americans (and possibly more) are likely to die because of the president.

Since the beginning of the coronavirus crisis, Trump's public statements and actions have followed a similar trajectory: They have been dishonest, misleading, fantastical, and dangerous. It would blow over soon, he said early on. It would go away when the weather got warmer. "The coronavirus is very much under control in the USA," he tweeted. It wasn't.

While thankfully there's no more talk of re-opening the economy on Easter, the damage has been done. America has become the epicenter of a global pandemic.

Consider that the United States and South Korea reported their first coronavirus cases on the same day — Jan. 20. More than two months later, South Korea has just under 10,000 confirmed cases and 169 deaths. By comparison, the United States has more than 216,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and more than 5,000 people have died. Taking into account population differences (the US has 327 million people and South Korea has around 51 million people), the number of cases is more than three times greater than South Korea — and the death toll is nearly four times as great.

These horrific numbers could have been avoided with genuine presidential leadership.

After the initial case was diagnosed in January, South Korea immediately began aggressive testing and quarantines. Private companies were encouraged to develop diagnostic tests. Within a month drive-through screening centers had been set up and thousands were being tested daily.

In the United States, Trump refused to focus on the issue. Two days after that initial positive case he declared "We have it totally under control. It's one person coming from China. It's going to be just fine." When Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar was first able to talk to Trump about the coronavirus on Jan. 18, Trump wanted to talk about a recently announced vaping ban.

Into February, Trump was still stubbornly resisting bureaucratic efforts to deal with the emerging crisis. The weeks lost in ramping up testing were a lost — and unforgivable —opportunity to save lives.

Trump's obstinance is bad enough — but the delay was also undoubtedly influenced by Trump's diktat that testing should not be a priority. The more testing that was done, the more positive results there would be and that was an outcome the president did not want.

Keeping the numbers low in order to avoid spooking Wall Street and negatively affecting Trump's reelection became the administration's focus.

Those presidential-created obstacles did more than prevent essential equipment from getting to communities in need — it seeded a deadly message of doubt, particularly to Trump supporters.

Researchers at the University of Washington look at five critical social distancing policies and the varying implementation between states. They found that states "with Republican governors and Republican electorates" delayed each of these initiatives "by an average of 2.70 days."

While more than 30 states have issued stay-at-home orders, a host of states have either not made such state-wide declarations or done partial orders. Nearly all are helmed by Republican governors. In Arizona, GOP Governor, Doug Ducey prevented cities and counties from putting in effect stay-at-home orders. He didn't issue his own statewide decree until this week. Last week, the Republican governor of Mississippi Tate Reeves overruled city and county social distancing measures. Under pressure, he announced a stay-at-home order on Wednesday that will go into effect Friday.

Trump is not directly responsible for these delays, but did Trump's suggestion that the disease was no worse than the flu give cover to Republican governors who preferred to delay social distancing efforts? Did it encourage them to drag their feet? It's hard to argue otherwise. With the combination of misinformation spread on Fox News (particularly during a crucial period in late February and early March when the outlet's anchors were playing down the threat from the coronavirus), will more Americans in red states test positive for the coronavirus and die needlessly? Almost certainly.

Trump has also publicly suggested that Democratic governors who don't show him proper veneration will have to get in the back of the line for medical supplies. And there is emerging evidence that Republican states are having their requests for ventilators and protective equipment met while blue states are getting the short end of the stick. How many people, simply because they live in a blue state, are going to die because of this president's petty cruelty?

It's not an easy thing to accuse a president of being personally responsible for the deaths of Americans, but with Trump and the coronavirus, it's simply a fact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 02, 2020, 07:38:18 AM
A friend of my daughter, a driving instructor in his mid forties and a non-smoker, felt unwell over last weekend. He grew steadily worse and when his lips turned blue his wife phoned 111 who sent for an ambulance. Due to the oxygen levels being dangerously low in his blood the medics rushed him to hospital. Twelve hours later his wife was contacted and instructed to pick up her husband and return him home, which she did. He experienced a terrible night, shared by his his family which included a 13 year old daughter, with a sky-high temperature, a constant cough and again blue lips. His wife again contacted 111 and an ambulance arrived a second time to take him to hospital. They have now informed his wife that they are 99% certain he has Coronavirus. 

The lack of testing equipment in the UK is a national disgrace and lives are being lost by shameful ineptitude.  
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 02, 2020, 07:39:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 06:29:36 AM
Hi André,

Where did you see this story?  "Chinese plane with material purchased by Quebec government lands in Montreal, 'rerouted' by DHL to Cincinnati."

I've been trying for some time to pull it up, but so far no luck.  Confused too:  you said *"lands in Montreal" and then followed by it being re-routed by DHL.  So, do you mean that after it had landed on Canadian soil, that it was then instructed not to dock there and unload the supplies and instead take off and fly to Cincinnati?

*or do you mean that it was supposed to have landed in Montreal?  Translation/languages are difficult I know; I make errors all the time--even in my own language!  ;)

Best wishes,

PD



Hi PD,

The story is on various canadian news outlets, including the CBC (Radio-Canada)

https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1690419/masques-canada-chine-quebec-avion-detournes (https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1690419/masques-canada-chine-quebec-avion-detournes)


The story is about cargo bound for Montreal sold to the highest bidder on the tarmac of the chinese airport.

https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2020/04/02/des-masques-pour-le-quebec-detournes (https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2020/04/02/des-masques-pour-le-quebec-detournes)

TVA News mentions the plane's arrival in Montreal and rerouting to Cincinnati.

From RTBF (the belgian equivalent of ABC, BBC, CBC):

https://www.rtbf.be/info/dossier/epidemie-de-coronavirus/detail_coronavirus-masques-et-respirateurs-lorsque-les-etats-unis-et-israel-detournent-les-commandes-des-autres-pays?id=10474041 (https://www.rtbf.be/info/dossier/epidemie-de-coronavirus/detail_coronavirus-masques-et-respirateurs-lorsque-les-etats-unis-et-israel-detournent-les-commandes-des-autres-pays?id=10474041)

I've read about other countries doing the same thing. Check european news outlets for more stories.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 08:12:45 AM
Thank you for the links and suggestions André.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 02, 2020, 08:13:56 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 02, 2020, 07:38:18 AM
A friend of my daughter, a driving instructor in his mid forties and a non-smoker, felt unwell over last weekend. He grew steadily worse and when his lips turned blue his wife phoned 111 who sent for an ambulance. Due to the oxygen levels being dangerously low in his blood the medics rushed him to hospital. Twelve hours later his wife was contacted and instructed to pick up her husband and return him home, which she did. He experienced a terrible night, shared by his his family which included a 13 year old daughter, with a sky-high temperature, a constant cough and again blue lips. His wife again contacted 111 and an ambulance arrived a second time to take him to hospital. They have now informed his wife that they are 99% certain he has Coronavirus. 

That's a bad story, there's obviously pressure to get people out of hospital.

The lack of testing equipment in the UK is a national disgrace and lives are being lost by shameful ineptitude.

You may want to read this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/01/absolutely-wrong-how-uk-coronavirus-test-strategy-unravelled

A friend of mine was a GP who gave up practising after an organ transplant, he's young but because of the transplant he's very vulnerable. He's bought an oximeter -- it measures the oxygen content of your blood, it's easy to use and (used to be) cheap and widely available on ebay. He thought that if he could report the O2 content to emergency services, there would be less questions, less dithering, if he was in trouble. Reading about your friend, I think he was wise to get one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 02, 2020, 08:53:54 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 02, 2020, 07:38:18 AM
The lack of testing equipment in the UK is a national disgrace and lives are being lost by shameful ineptitude.

Indeed. Particularly deeply frustrating when from all appearances it is down to a lack of government foresight (or perhaps even concern) at the beginning of all this, about the vital nature of testing in confronting the looming pandemic. Despite numerous warnings from senior medical sources.

edit to add:
Having said that, I have little taste for criticism at the moment, as I can't see it serving much purpose. What I and I imagine almost everyone instinctively feels is a desire for constructive and cooperative behaviour, which seems our best hope out of this, both practically and mentally, and it's true every one of us has a part to play in a way I think.

When in passing the BBC news tonight showed footage of a busy London train terminal a few weeks ago, strange to say I almost welled up! How intense the ordinary can seem when it is suddenly denied you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 02, 2020, 09:08:51 AM

     (https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/2020/covid19_hotspots_graphic_d(1).png)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2020, 09:27:11 AM
Boston hospitals getting 'game changer' machine that sterilizes 80,000 protective masks a day (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/02/metro/boston-hospitals-getting-game-changer-machine-that-sterilizes-80000-protective-masks-day/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 09:43:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 02, 2020, 09:27:11 AM
Boston hospitals getting 'game changer' machine that sterilizes 80,000 protective masks a day (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/02/metro/boston-hospitals-getting-game-changer-machine-that-sterilizes-80000-protective-masks-day/)
Excellent!  I can't see the whole article, but that sounds like wonderful news!

Saw this too:  https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/02/nation/kraft-family-used-patriots-team-plane-shuttle-protective-masks-china-boston-wsj-reports/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 02, 2020, 11:13:15 AM
Quote from: Iota on April 02, 2020, 08:53:54 AM
Indeed. Particularly deeply frustrating when from all appearances it is down to a lack of government foresight (or perhaps even concern) at the beginning of all this, about the vital nature of testing in confronting the looming pandemic. Despite numerous warnings from senior medical sources.

edit to add:
Having said that, I have little taste for criticism at the moment, as I can't see it serving much purpose. What I and I imagine almost everyone instinctively feels is a desire for constructive and cooperative behaviour, which seems our best hope out of this, both practically and mentally, and it's true every one of us has a part to play in a way I think.

When in passing the BBC news tonight showed footage of a busy London train terminal a few weeks ago, strange to say I almost welled up! How intense the ordinary can seem when it is suddenly denied you.

Someone on the news yesterday mentioned that  the UK has fewer ventilators per capita than the US...and the US number is also too low, of course.

Today's news is that 2000 of the ventilators the federal government has sent out were unuseable.

BTW, Gov DeSantis of Florida did issue a statewide order yesterday, to take effect tomorrow. He said he did only after tslking to Trump...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 02, 2020, 11:16:05 AM


From today's Washington Post, this article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/02/trump-is-always-last-figure-it-out/
(//http://)
from which this pearl of wisdom shines like a beacon:

Quote
The contrast between the governors' level of sophistication and Trump's abject ignorance manages to still shock and appall us. On Wednesday, Trump explained how his thinking on covid-19 had changed. "The severity," Trump said. "I think also in looking at the way that the contagion is so contagious, nobody's ever seen anything like this where large groups of people all of a sudden have it just by being in the presence of somebody who has it. The flu has never been like that. . . . Also the violence of it if it hits the right person."

The contagion is so contagious. That's the president of the United States. He was warned by experts for weeks that this was highly contagious and that this was not the ordinary flu. Apparently, he was either not listening or did not understand that "just by being in the presence of somebody who has it" the contagion can, well, be contagious. The mind reels.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2020, 11:18:02 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 02, 2020, 11:13:15 AM
BTW, Gov DeSantis of Florida did issue a statewide order yesterday, to take effect tomorrow. He said he did only after tslking to Trump...

Well, he needed to ask leave . . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 02, 2020, 11:26:42 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 02, 2020, 11:18:02 AM
Well, he needed to ask leave . . . .

Fortunately for us, the local officials have prompter, albeit not necessarily as prompt as they might be, especially in Miami. Broward County (mine...Fort Lauderdale for easy reference) has had such an order for almost two weeks, so one hopes the curve will start to flatten here in the next few days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 11:41:12 AM
Alas ventilators are a minor effect. Most cases who go on ventilators die, 70-80%. Masks though, particularly for medical personnel, and tests are big deals.

Medtronic, the world's largest medical equipment maker, has given away all their ventilator patents and made available all their blue prints and manufacturing processes to anyone who can make them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 02, 2020, 11:59:14 AM

     Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, who resisted strict coronavirus measures, says he just learned it transmits asymptomatically (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/04/02/georgia-gov-brian-kemp-who-resisted-strict-coronavirus-measures-says-he-just-learned-it-transmitted-asymptomatically/)

      He just learned it.

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R), Kemp's neighboring state leader, has also said some strange things about the data in her state. She said Tuesday of the infections in Alabama: "Y'all, we are not Louisiana, we are not New York state, we are not California." As The Washington Post's Philip Bump noted, though, the rate of the spread in Alabama was similar to the early days of New York and worse than in California.

     Repub dumbfuckery wasn't invented by Trump. It has been building for decades.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 12:28:31 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 11:41:12 AM
Alas ventilators are a minor effect. Most cases who go on ventilators die, 70-80%. Masks though, particularly for medical personnel, and tests are big deals.

Medtronic, the world's largest medical equipment maker, has given away all their ventilator patents and made available all their blue prints and manufacturing processes to anyone who can make them.
Good to hear the news about Medtronics.  Not certain whether or not it's all of their ventilator patents though (don't know how many different models they have).  I found this online (from Forbes magazine):  https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2020/03/30/medtronic-gives-away-ventilator-design-specs-in-coronavirus-fight-ahead-of-tesla-alliance/#772100b64591

Still, that and their partnership with Tesla....great news!   :)

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 02, 2020, 12:41:20 PM
Pies in the sky..... I am sorry to say.

There is a lot of talk about the magical appearance of ventilators that are not there yet, nor will they be in the upcoming weeks - when they will actually be needed.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 12:49:02 PM
Quote from: Que on April 02, 2020, 12:41:20 PM
Pies in the sky..... I am sorry to say.

There is a lot of talk about the magical appearance of ventilators that are not there yet, nor will they be in the upcoming weeks - when they will actually be needed.

Q
Please either read or listen at this article (transcript is also there)...it mentions weeks; how long it ends up being, I don't know but will try and follow the story as best as I can.  I had posted it earlier:  https://www.npr.org/2020/04/02/825800514/planet-money-the-parable-of-the-piston
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 02, 2020, 01:18:01 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 11:41:12 AM
Alas ventilators are a minor effect. Most cases who go on ventilators die, 70-80%.
I've seen data that says 97% to 65%, BUT that is based on limited data. As far as I can see, there really isn't enough data to say what it is with any certainty.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 01:18:22 PM
Quote from: Que on April 02, 2020, 12:41:20 PM
Pies in the sky..... I am sorry to say.

There is a lot of talk about the magical appearance of ventilators that are not there yet, nor will they be in the upcoming weeks - when they will actually be needed.

Q

No they won't be. But we are going to need them for a long while yet. With no vaccine the best we can do is flatten and thereby extend the curve. A steady flow of cases with a steady flow of ventilator cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 01:21:59 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 02, 2020, 01:18:01 PM
I've seen data that says 97% to 65%, BUT that is based on limited data. As far as I can see, there really isn't enough data to say what it is with any certainty.
No there isn't, and the stats might be skewed by the lack of ventilators, meaning they go to only more serious cases. Lots of uncertainty.  We need to build them, but they are always just going to be chipping away at the margins.
I think our best hope to avert catastrophe is an effective anti viral and effective testing. The best candidates look to be chloroquine and remdesivir, but neither is proven yet. There are other drugs too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 02, 2020, 01:54:04 PM
Hopeful news from Denmark: Researchers in Denmark are starting to test a promising drug in #covid19 patients, barely a month after research appeared showing the drug could stop the virus in cell culture. (https://twitter.com/kakape/status/1245765966690205698)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2020, 02:32:34 PM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 02, 2020, 01:54:04 PM
Hopeful news from Denmark: Researchers in Denmark are starting to test a promising drug in #covid19 patients, barely a month after research appeared showing the drug could stop the virus in cell culture. (https://twitter.com/kakape/status/1245765966690205698)
Hope that it works!  Will have to read more about it later....sorry, busy!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 02, 2020, 04:47:39 PM
Well said, John. Very well said !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 06:28:46 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.

Good luck and I think you made a wise choice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 03, 2020, 12:08:28 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.

Thank you, John. Indeed wise choice. Best of luck to you and all your loved ones. Stay safe all!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 03, 2020, 04:57:35 AM
(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F6997f476-751e-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 03, 2020, 05:07:04 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.
John,

I thought that your governor ordered a shelter-in-place recently?  I saw something online dated March 25th which only said that it was for two weeks though?  Are you considered as working for an essential service?  Can you provide a link to the official website?

Am surprised at the stubbornness of some states and people in terms of wanting to still have religious services (in person--not via Zoom or some other virtual way).   :(  I think that they (the services) are still allowed in some states...like Georgia?

Stay safe and wishing the best for you and your parents.   :)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 06:19:40 AM
Quote from: Que on April 03, 2020, 04:57:35 AM
(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F6997f476-751e-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

I don't trust China's numbers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 03, 2020, 07:33:35 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 06:19:40 AM
I don't trust China's numbers.


     C.I.A. Hunts for Authentic Virus Totals in China, Dismissing Government Tallies (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/us/politics/cia-coronavirus-china.html)

But American intelligence agencies have concluded that the Chinese government itself does not know the extent of the virus and is as blind as the rest of the world. Midlevel bureaucrats in the city of Wuhan, where the virus originated, and elsewhere in China have been lying about infection rates, testing and death counts, fearful that if they report numbers that are too high they will be punished, lose their position or worse, current and former intelligence officials said.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 03, 2020, 08:34:08 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 03, 2020, 12:08:28 AM
Thank you, John. Indeed wise choice. Best of luck to you and all your loved ones. Stay safe all!
Quote from: André on April 02, 2020, 04:47:39 PM
Well said, John. Very well said !
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 02, 2020, 06:28:46 PM
Good luck and I think you made a wise choice.

Thanks a lot, gents. I appreciate it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 03, 2020, 08:51:32 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 03, 2020, 05:07:04 AM
John,

I thought that your governor ordered a shelter-in-place recently?  I saw something online dated March 25th which only said that it was for two weeks though?  Are you considered as working for an essential service?  Can you provide a link to the official website?

Am surprised at the stubbornness of some states and people in terms of wanting to still have religious services (in person--not via Zoom or some other virtual way).   :(  I think that they (the services) are still allowed in some states...like Georgia?

Stay safe and wishing the best for you and your parents.   :)

Best wishes,

PD

I work for Walmart, which is as essential as it gets since it's a grocery store plus selling other items like cleaning chemicals and having a pharmacy. Governor Kemp issued a 'shelter-in-place' order which takes effect today starting at 6 PM or so I read. Essentially, what this means to me is people are not allowed out unless they're buying groceries, seeking medical treatment, or going to the pharmacy. Basically, the essentials that everyone needs to stay alive. I'm not sure if religious services are allowed in Georgia or not, but I did hear in the news of someone getting heavily criticized (perhaps even fined) for holding a service this past Sunday or Sunday before last. Anyway, I've made my decision and my decision is to self-quarantine and I think it's absolutely despicable how some retailers are basically saying "Your paycheck or your health". I chose my health. I have worked for Walmart for 10 years, do you honestly think they'd care if I left? No, because I'm just a number, but my point is people who don't have the choice financially to choose not to work are the ones I'm worried about as they live paycheck-to-paycheck and if, god forbid, someone in their household gets this virus, they're not going to be allowed to come back to work until they're 100% better. I put my foot down and have basically said that my own health and the own well-being of those closest to me are more important than getting a paycheck, which is all that job is to me anyway. I'm currently looking into finding a company that will allow me to work from home. People have to make up their own minds about what they're going to do, but if a person can stay at home and are financially able to do so, then they need to do it. I see people keeping the roads hot going back and forth all day long from one place to another --- these are the people that we need to scared of, because they think they're above the law. The only thing I can do is get what I need from a grocery store and get the hell out of it and, most importantly, STAY HOME!!!

I hope everything is going well for you and this goes for each person here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 03, 2020, 08:52:33 AM
Quote from: Que on April 03, 2020, 04:57:35 AM
(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F6997f476-751e-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

New cases have been slowing down recently here. What's happening in Holland?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 09:06:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 03, 2020, 08:52:33 AM
New cases have been slowing down recently here. What's happening in Holland?

I don't want to sound too pessimistic but country level numbers mislead, since the virus is spread unevenly. It looks to be peaking in Italy but might only be peaking in the affected northern part. If it gets a foothold in other areas it could explode again. I don't know there are any sources for regional data that are helpful. But I see people saying "whew". That's premature.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 03, 2020, 09:23:10 AM

     (https://i.imgur.com/DP9BUXc.png)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 03, 2020, 09:31:27 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.
Nice to see you back here John. I'm sure that your decision was very wise, putting your family first. All strength to you and yours.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 03, 2020, 09:37:39 AM

White House plays hardball, orders 3M to stop exporting N95 masks to canadian, latin american markets. 3M warns that the opposite effect might occur if other countries retaliate. Trudeau notes that thousands of canadian nurses cross the border daily to work in US hospitals, warns that there would be consequences to US embargo.

3M press release (see middle paragraph: The Administration also requested that 3M cease exporting respirators)

https://news.3m.com/press-release/company-english/3m-response-defense-production-act-order (https://news.3m.com/press-release/company-english/3m-response-defense-production-act-order)

Politico article:

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/03/3m-warns-of-white-house-order-to-stop-exporting-masks-to-canada-163060 (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/03/3m-warns-of-white-house-order-to-stop-exporting-masks-to-canada-163060)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 03, 2020, 09:41:40 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 03, 2020, 08:51:32 AM
I work for Walmart, which is as essential as it gets since it's a grocery store plus selling other items like cleaning chemicals and having a pharmacy. Governor Kemp issued a 'shelter-in-place' order which takes effect today starting at 6 PM or so I read. Essentially, what this means to me is people are not allowed out unless they're buying groceries, seeking medical treatment, or going to the pharmacy. Basically, the essentials that everyone needs to stay alive. I'm not sure if religious services are allowed in Georgia or not, but I did hear in the news of someone getting heavily criticized (perhaps even fined) for holding a service this past Sunday or Sunday before last. Anyway, I've made my decision and my decision is to self-quarantine and I think it's absolutely despicable how some retailers are basically saying "Your paycheck or your health". I chose my health. I have worked for Walmart for 10 years, do you honestly think they'd care if I left? No, because I'm just a number, but my point is people who don't have the choice financially to choose not to work are the ones I'm worried about as they live paycheck-to-paycheck and if, god forbid, someone in their household gets this virus, they're not going to be allowed to come back to work until they're 100% better. I put my foot down and have basically said that my own health and the own well-being of those closest to me are more important than getting a paycheck, which is all that job is to me anyway. I'm currently looking into finding a company that will allow me to work from home. People have to make up their own minds about what they're going to do, but if a person can stay at home and are financially able to do so, then they need to do it. I see people keeping the roads hot going back and forth all day long from one place to another --- these are the people that we need to scared of, because they think they're above the law. The only thing I can do is get what I need from a grocery store and get the hell out of it and, most importantly, STAY HOME!!!

I hope everything is going well for you and this goes for each person here.
I hope that all goes well for you and they are understanding about your concern for your parents and that you still have a job to go back to after all of this is over.  Please keep us updated.

Best wishes,

PD

p.s.  I found this article about the pastor who was arrested:  https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-pastor-says-he-got-death-threats-after-being-charged-n1175171
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 09:54:11 AM
Quote from: André on April 03, 2020, 09:37:39 AM
White House plays hardball, orders 3M to stop exporting N95 masks to canadian, latin american markets. 3M warns that the opposite effect might occur if other countries retaliate. Trudeau notes that thousands of canadian nurses cross the border daily to work in US hospitals, warns that there would be consequences to US embargo.

3M press release (see middle paragraph: The Administration also requested that 3M cease exporting respirators)

https://news.3m.com/press-release/company-english/3m-response-defense-production-act-order (https://news.3m.com/press-release/company-english/3m-response-defense-production-act-order)

Politico article:

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/03/3m-warns-of-white-house-order-to-stop-exporting-masks-to-canada-163060 (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/03/3m-warns-of-white-house-order-to-stop-exporting-masks-to-canada-163060)

I told friends last night how appalled I am at this action. I feared Trump would react like this.  I hope we can keep politics to a minimum in this particular thread, but this kind of action is profoundly dangerous. The medical supply system is global and fragile.  Many items come from one or two places, usually abroad. Embargoes are catastrophic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 03, 2020, 10:30:29 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 09:54:11 AM
I told friends last night how appalled I am at this action. I feared Trump would react like this.  I hope we can keep politics to a minimum in this particular thread, but this kind of action is profoundly dangerous. The medical supply system is global and fragile.  Many items come from one or two places, usually abroad. Embargoes are catastrophic.

I agree 100%.

Globalization (so-called 'delocalization') led to this. Far from me to have politics get the upper hand here, but decisions such as these are political by nature and should be denounced as they play to the 'me first', après moi le déluge mentality. We should unite, not fight each other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 03, 2020, 10:33:26 AM
Quote from: André on April 03, 2020, 10:30:29 AM
I agree 100%.

Globalization (so-called 'delocalization') led to this. Far from me to have politics get the upper hand here, but decisions such as these are political by nature and should be denounced as they play to the 'me first', après moi le déluge mentality. We should unite, not fight each other.
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 03, 2020, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 02, 2020, 04:14:31 PM
I have to say this nasty monster of a virus has caused so many problems for so many people --- myself included. As of today, I have decided that it was in the best interest of my parents health with whom I live with to not return to work as I don't want to expose them to anything nor do I want it myself obviously. I filed for a leave of absence until early June and whether it gets approved or not won't be of much concern to me. The last thing I want is for any of my loved ones to get this virus because of my own selfish 'need' to work when the easiest solution was to just stay home. I have a good bit of paid vacation time that I have accrued over the past year, so I'll definitely be using this.

I hope all of you are doing well or trying to do the best you can. I have never witnessed anything like this of this magnitude, but, if history has taught us anything, the human spirit will prevail --- we just have to try to live each day the only way we know how to. My prayers are with all of you.

Many have had to make painful choices. We have to do what is right for ourselves, our family, our loved ones and our communities. I hope it works out for you and your family.

I am thankful that when we go food shopping there is staff there. They deserve extra battle pa for the risk they are taking. At our local Whole Foods market they have limited the number of people in the store, they have put up glass barriers separating the clerks from customers at the check out, and they have divided the floor into boxes which can only be occupied by one person. Still, there is risk. Many retailers do far less to protect staff and customers, and it is not right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 03, 2020, 01:34:54 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 03, 2020, 01:28:47 PM
Many have had to make painful choices. We have to do what is right for ourselves, our family, our loved ones and our communities. I hope it works out for you and your family.

I am thankful that when we go food shopping there is staff there. They deserve extra battle pa for the risk they are taking. At our local Whole Foods market they have limited the number of people in the store, they have put up glass barriers separating the clerks from customers at the check out, and they have divided the floor into boxes which can only be occupied by one person. Still, there is risk. Many retailers do far less to protect staff and customers, and it is not right.

Agreed. Avoid said retailers.
I am lucky to live near the countryside. Some farm markets are operating a phone order curbside service. So are grocery stores. No personal contact at all. Many businesses here have installed plexiglass and are limiting entry. Pretty responsible stuff around here anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 03, 2020, 02:16:27 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 03, 2020, 01:28:47 PM
Many have had to make painful choices. We have to do what is right for ourselves, our family, our loved ones and our communities. I hope it works out for you and your family.

I am thankful that when we go food shopping there is staff there. They deserve extra battle pa for the risk they are taking. At our local Whole Foods market they have limited the number of people in the store, they have put up glass barriers separating the clerks from customers at the check out, and they have divided the floor into boxes which can only be occupied by one person. Still, there is risk. Many retailers do far less to protect staff and customers, and it is not right.

Thank you very much. I'm sure it'll work out for me and my family. I know this must be the most stressful time in many people's lives, especially those who work in healthcare. You've got to respect someone who puts themselves in harm's way 24/7 and has made it their life's work to serve people. Personally, I don't know where they get the strength, energy and drive. I no longer allow myself to be subjected to a company whose policies aren't concerned with their associates own general well-being and where their only concern is the bottom line. What these big retailers have failed to realize is that without us serving their customers and putting up with an ungodly amount of bullshit while their bank balances get larger, they wouldn't be in the position they're in right now. More importantly, without customers, I wouldn't have earned a paycheck. I've been in retail since I was 15 yrs. old. I think a change of job will not only be a breath of fresh air for me, but, hopefully, something that I get immense pleasure from. Again, thank you for your message. I appreciate it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 05:52:56 PM
Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro hits out at 'dictatorial' Rio beaches ban (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/03/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-hits-out-dictatorial-rio-beach-bans)

"The Brazilian president has further undermined efforts to control the spread of coronavirus by criticising what he called "dictatorial" moves to stop citizens going to the beach.

In an interview on Thursday, Jair Bolsonaro hit out at Rio de Janeiro's governor, Wilson Witzel, who this week ordered the state's 17 million citizens to stay at home – and off the sands.

"Ban people from going to the beach? My God!" said Brazil's far-right president, who has faced protests and opposition from across the political spectrum for downplaying the threat of Covid-19.

"Beaches are outdoors. There's no problem going there at all," added Bolsonaro, contradicting guidelines "[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 05:57:18 PM
'We will starve': Zimbabwe's poor full of misgiving over Covid-19 lockdown
Unable to access state benefits, food and even running water as the country shuts up shop, people in Harare fear the worst (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/03/we-will-starve-zimbabwes-poor-full-of-misgiving-over-covid-19-lockdown)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 03, 2020, 07:15:45 PM
People stay safe at home, don't go out after dark, because now, in some part of Montreal-East and North it's dangerous plain and simple, the corona virus , is a danger , but people  ''street gang'' that don't respect the law attack  do home invasion in Montreal, clue they come from Venezuala and honduras there across the world now these ms?? whatever in  a friend part of town taggs are all over in one night on one street I heard they were three street invasion from illegals criminal gangs, I'm not racist, but can someone do something about it please...

A government official on immigration or something, people are scared of goeing out and some are scare at home of arm burglary, this is serious, Police need to do somesort of profiling of somesort of gangs violent gang, they are there  to profit police busy, so people are not only hostage at there home bull double lock the door, I'm not that afraid since my neighborhood under control police patrol some part of town they don't, tags shown there presence in place , there were not  in the first place they are  trying to own some place of Montreal spread terror, I might sound alarmist, but christ one of my friend  living in hochelaga far away scare to death of going outside. Inquietude is palpable in citizens.

This is not a message about hate, this is a massage about a warning call for police force, check these deadly gangs, there outhere

First thing I notice they were all over my neighborhood last summer try to stole my bike I had to get it inside for safety purpose, the next november a plamplets passer, publicity an hispanic dude try to force my doors in morning during is job.

I'm not hispanic or spagniard phobic some of my friend are  spagniard and basques and they are worried too.. this problem of street gangs rule over five continent is sickening, they are in americas, europe, south-africa , Egypt, even has remote has Seoul Korea, Thailand.

What od we  as human being do , we are in crisis and these deadly gang want to jeopardized on or fear to  burglarized, kill or whatever, us human being: white , brown, black yellow... you get the message this is not hate speech, but what can we do about this...

I'm clueless don't ask me



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 03, 2020, 09:13:57 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EUcolAhXkAAxOI7.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 09:16:59 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on April 03, 2020, 07:15:45 PM
People stay safe at home, don't go out after dark, because now, in some part of Montreal-East and North it's dangerous plain and simple, the corona virus , is a danger , but people  ''street gang'' that don't respect the law attack  do home invasion in Montreal, clue they come from Venezuala and honduras there across the world now these ms?? whatever in  a friend part of town taggs are all over in one night on one street I heard they were three street invasion from illegals criminal gangs, I'm not racist, but can someone do something about it please...


^I'm not seeing any news out of Montreal this week about gang violence - hispanic or otherwise. Is there something you could link to?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 09:21:58 PM
The 7 Best Coronavirus Podcasts - Vulture (https://www.vulture.com/article/coronavirus-podcasts.html)

[...]


America Dissected: Coronavirus (Crooked Media) (https://crooked.com/podcast-series/america-dissected/)

Last fall, the progressive media company Crooked Media launched America Dissected, an audio documentary series hosted by a physician and former city health commissioner, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, that sought to examine America's deeply broken healthcare system and general relationship to science. That debut season laid the foundation for this more immediate second season, which is positioning itself to not only keep listeners updated on the latest COVID-19 development, but root the analysis in a longer view of how we got here.

Coronavirus Daily (NPR) (https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510355/coronavirusdaily)

At this point, all news podcasts are coronavirus podcasts, and one thing to watch is how different news podcasts, traditionally built for more general coverage, find different ways into this demanding story of a global pandemic. But if you wanted to stay close to incremental development, and if you want to keep yourself within the public radio frame of mind, NPR has your back with this specialized daily news podcast.

Coronavirus: Fact vs. Fiction with Dr. Sanjay Gupta (CNN) (https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/corona-virus)

Serving up bite-sized episodes that are published daily, the CNN podcast functions really well as a tool for constant anxiety recalibration and modest reassurance. Systematic and thoughtfully-produced, it's good for a daily moment of zen, given the circumstances.

Viral: Coronavirus (ThreeUncannyFour) (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/viral-coronavirus/id1500978005)

Made by the same podcast studio that brought you Broken: Jeffrey Epstein, this podcast endeavors to balance what's happening in the big picture and how you should processing all of it as an individual, without hype or hysteria.

Epidemic With Dr. Celine Gounder and Ronald Klain (Just Human Productions) (https://open.spotify.com/show/3DLvofLCx0o7adGqnfZvxl)

If you wish to go deeper into the science and public policy angle of the COVID-19 phenomenon, look no further than this podcast from an infectious disease specialist and the former U.S. Ebola czar. They may not be radio professionals, but that doesn't matter when they're actual experts.

Coronavirus Global Update (BBC World Service) (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w13xtv39)

The coronavirus pandemic is a global phenomenon, obviously, and so if you're hoping to keep daily tabs on what's going on in other countries, the BBC World Service has got your back. The BBC has excelled at this format for a long time with its regular daily news dispatches, so it makes sense that they would be one of the stronger outfits to cover this crisis.

Coronavirus Daily Briefing (Ride Home Media) (https://art19.com/shows/coronavirus-daily-briefing)

An audio digest of all the major coronavirus-related headlines, for folks who really want to stay close to the story. The irony is that Ride Home Media specializes in the listen-to-this-on-your-after-work-commute genre of podcasting, and while fewer people are even commuting at all any more, their COVID-19 briefing will still be useful even if you're stuck at home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 03, 2020, 11:49:01 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 09:16:59 PM
^I'm not seeing any news out of Montreal this week about gang violence - hispanic or otherwise. Is there something you could link to?

Mister SimonNZ not all news are reported it depend if you live in a trashy part of town , and it's not me having problem of any sort but my friend paranoia over seeing too much ms 13 or ms 18 in his neighborhood and perhaps the facts his bike got stolen, he blame them for this...

As for me I haven't no problem I mind my own buziness that it,  I mention this because he freaking out...I'm not, perhaps I did panic because of him in turmoil his neighborhood though now...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 04, 2020, 05:37:51 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 03, 2020, 09:16:59 PM
^I'm not seeing any news out of Montreal this week about gang violence - hispanic or otherwise. Is there something you could link to?

I think our friend lives in an alternative world. Today's Montreal Gazette:  https://montrealgazette.com/ (https://montrealgazette.com/). Not a word about that kind of thing. I should know, being a montrealer myself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 06:35:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 03, 2020, 09:13:57 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EUcolAhXkAAxOI7.jpg)
Were it not Britain I would suspect a parody.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 07:13:53 AM
The danger of embargoes and actions like the attack on 3M  https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/03/sicken-thy-neighbor-trade-policy.html (https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/03/sicken-thy-neighbor-trade-policy.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 04, 2020, 08:31:06 AM
I leave you all whit a positive  note to the tread, use eye's protector for insomniac reverse way do a knot in one of the cord for size BAM you got an ideal mask for protection against COVID 19  IT'S DOUBLE TISSUE and confortable for warm weather, Lysol it sometime once or twice a week for sanity & safety of course, I'm not there to judge, we won't miss masks In canada that way whit these additional masks but legit not a gangster masks quite normal looking you can breed and it block you nose  you can also talk whiteout problem. I got this at a local Jean Coutu(local Pharmacy whit the glasse's, purpose of intervention saving life protecting lives.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 04, 2020, 09:22:40 AM

     Chinese families should be sweeping graves now. But thousands still haven't buried their dead. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/chinese-families-should-be-sweeping-graves-now-but-thousands-still-havent-buried-their-dead/2020/04/03/5a6daa50-7234-11ea-ad9b-254ec99993bc_story.html)

Using photos posted online, social media sleuths have estimated that Wuhan funeral homes have returned 3,500 urns a day since March 23. That would imply a death toll in Wuhan of about 42,000 — or 16 times the official number. Another widely shared calculation from Radio Free Asia, based on Wuhan's 84 furnaces running nonstop and each cremation taking an hour, put the death toll at 46,800.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 04, 2020, 10:14:48 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 06:35:19 AM
Were it not Britain I would suspect a parody.

https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 04, 2020, 11:05:44 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 02, 2020, 01:54:04 PM
Hopeful news from Denmark: Researchers in Denmark are starting to test a promising drug in #covid19 patients, barely a month after research appeared showing the drug could stop the virus in cell culture. (https://twitter.com/kakape/status/1245765966690205698)

This is a drug, made some years ago in Japan, for the treatment of heartburn and pancreatitis. Its name is Camostat Mesylate. The investigators in Aarhus think they will have a usable answer about whether it can be used against SARS Co-Vi 2 or not in three months.

In Danish here:
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-03-26-to-danske-forskere-haaber-paa-corona-gennembrud-hvis-alt-gaar-vel-kan-vi-teste-i
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 11:11:03 AM
Anyone here tried to make their own masks yet?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 04, 2020, 11:19:12 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 11:11:03 AM
Anyone here tried to make their own masks yet?

My wife is making them. Same model as the surgical ones, with an inside slit allowing to insert a filter (coffee filter, towel paper, swiffer sheet). Embroidered initials added to avoid confusion  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 11:29:16 AM
Quote from: André on April 04, 2020, 11:19:12 AM
My wife is making them. Same model as the surgical ones, with an inside slit allowing to insert a filter (coffee filter, towel paper, swiffer sheet). Embroidered initials added to avoid confusion  ;D
Neat! Metal nose piece included or not?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 04, 2020, 11:38:03 AM
No, fabric only. This is home made stuff, after all  ;).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on April 04, 2020, 11:41:03 AM
It's one thing to make your own masks, but there is a value in not getting TOO artistic...

(https://i.imgur.com/T7vhmTa.jpg)

;D 
8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 11:43:19 AM
Quote from: André on April 04, 2020, 11:38:03 AM
No, fabric only. This is home made stuff, after all  ;).
I was guessing not!   ;) It did cross my brain though if I could make something like that with what I had at home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 11:50:18 AM
If you wear a mask treat it as a danger. If it has done anything useful then it has virus on it. Don't touch the working surface. Be careful where it goes. Wash or dispose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 04, 2020, 12:08:55 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 11:50:18 AM
If you wear a mask treat it as a danger. If it has done anything useful then it has virus on it. Don't touch the working surface. Be careful where it goes. Wash or dispose.

Yes, a mask thoughtlessly used might do more harm than good. Probably the best thing an improvised mask does is remind you not to touch your face, and remind others to maintain their social distance.

In my town I saw a hippie type walking down the Main Street singing while wearing a retro-looking gas mask with two metal filter canisters. Looked like it was designed for mustard gas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 12:17:24 PM
Bring back those 17th century beak masks, I say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 12:25:00 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 12:17:24 PM
Bring back those 17th century beak masks, I say.
6 ft beaks.

Although if we each wear one, maybe a 3ft beak might do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on April 04, 2020, 12:32:44 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 12:25:00 PM
6 ft beaks.

Although if we each wear one, maybe a 3ft beak might do.

+1 on that. "Know me by my beak".  :)

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on April 04, 2020, 12:54:57 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 11:11:03 AM
Anyone here tried to make their own masks yet?

My wife has also started cranking out masks just this morning, for our family and a few local friends.

For the past 25+ years, my wife has made the same Christmas present for both my father-in-law and me -- each year she makes us each 3 pairs of boxer shorts, in the craziest, loudest, most amusing fabric she can find.  She has lots of bits of the fabric left over, so we are gettting a wild assortment of masks -- superheroes, Dr. Who, race cars, bright paisley, etc.....

This also allows me to occasionally drop in casual conversation the true fact that I haven't bought a pair of underwear in over a quarter of a century, which does get me some odd looks...   :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 04, 2020, 01:28:04 PM
Quote from: j winter on April 04, 2020, 12:54:57 PM
My wife has also started cranking out masks just this morning, for our family and a few local friends.

For the past 25+ years, my wife has made the same Christmas present for both my father-in-law and me -- each year she makes us each 3 pairs of boxer shorts, in the craziest, loudest, most amusing fabric she can find.  She has lots of bits of the fabric left over, so we are gettting a wild assortment of masks -- superheroes, Dr. Who, race cars, bright paisley, etc.....

This also allows me to occasionally drop in casual conversation the true fact that I haven't bought a pair of underwear in over a quarter of a century, which does get me some odd looks...   :laugh:
:laugh:  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 04, 2020, 05:09:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 12:17:24 PM
Bring back those 17th century beak masks, I say.

It wasn't just the shape. I seem to recall they were filled with some sort of botanical potion that was supposed to neutralize the bad vapors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 04, 2020, 05:11:12 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 04, 2020, 05:09:06 PM
It wasn't just the shape. I seem to recall they were filled with some sort of botanical potion that was supposed to neutralize the bad vapors.

Yes. Herbs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 06:10:23 PM
British 5G towers are being set on fire amid coronavirus conspiracy theories (https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/4/21207927/5g-towers-burning-uk-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory-link)

"5G phone masts are being set alight in the UK, after online conspiracy theories have misleadingly linked the cell towers to the coronavirus pandemic. The BBC reports that at least three 5G towers were set alight within the last week, and police and fire services were called to extinguish the flames.

"I'm absolutely outraged and disgusted that people would be taking action against the infrastructure we need to tackle this emergency," said Stephen Powis, the National Health Service (NHS) director, at a daily UK coronavirus briefing. Police have now launched investigations into how the 5G towers caught fire.

Rumors and conspiracy theories over a link between the roll out of 5G and the spread of coronavirus have been spread primarily through social media networks. A variety of groups exist on Facebook and Nextdoor, where thousands of members repeat false and misleading claims that 5G is supposedly harmful.

One theory claims that the novel coronavirus originated in Wuhan because the Chinese city had recently been rolling out 5G. It's now supposedly spread to other cities that are also using 5G. These false conspiracy theories neglect to mention that a highly contagious virus would naturally spread more in densely populated cities with access to 5G, and that the coronavirus pandemic has hit counties like Iran and Japan where 5G isn't in use yet."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on April 04, 2020, 06:37:13 PM
There have been nearly 1.400 deaths in the U.S. from Covid-19 in the last 24 hours.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on April 04, 2020, 06:37:13 PM
There have been nearly 1.400 deaths in the U.S. from Covid-19 in the last 24 hours.
And every day I fight with denialists on the web. One fool predicted 7500 dead in the US for the entire epidemic. I said we past that already. Response:
Quote"We are well past that already."

You don't know that. You know what you're told. Believing it uncritically is a giveaway that, despite your advanced years, maybe you're not very bright.

Testing accuracy has been a major concern for this entire crisis. That's to be expected with a new disease - that being what "novel" in "Novel Coronavirus" means, after all.

So why do you believe these numbers? Do you REALLY believe that every death cert with "COVID-19" listed as a primary or contributing cause is 100% correct?

I am willing to bet the 5G arsonists are easier to reason with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 04, 2020, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 04, 2020, 06:46:17 PM
And every day I fight with denialists on the web. One fool predicted 7500 dead in the US for the entire epidemic. I said we past that already. Response:
I am willing to bet the 5G arsonists are easier to reason with.

It's like a mental version of the grey goo of apocalyptic science fiction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 09:17:35 PM
Marianne Faithfull hospitalised with coronavirus (https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2020/apr/04/marianne-faithfull-hospitalised-with-coronavirus)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 05, 2020, 12:07:18 AM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on April 04, 2020, 11:41:03 AM
It's one thing to make your own masks, but there is a value in not getting TOO artistic...

(https://i.imgur.com/T7vhmTa.jpg)

;D 
8)

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Honestly, I can't stand wearing a mask, it gets moistured on the inside in less than a minute and becomes extremely uncomfortable in five. I really tried but I can't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 12:09:49 AM
BBC article on Holland

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52135814
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 05, 2020, 02:32:20 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 12:09:49 AM
BBC article on Holland

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52135814

Rather suggestive and sensationalist journalism.....
Shame on you, BBC.... though this seems to be a free lancer that sold her "story" to different news outlets.

The Dutch are portrayed as cold and calculating,  with little consideration for their fellow man and fellow Europeans.
The piece does not contain any news, just a rehash of bits and pieces that have been already out there.

At the beginning of the crisis there was a brief spat about whether "herd" (group) immunity was the objective of the government approach. A similar discussion took place in the UK, actually. The issue was quickly side lined and group immunity as a objective isn't compatible with the current strategy, which will actually significantly delay or even prevent the build up of that level of immunity. Still, the matter is here rehashed and ostentatiously dished out....

But the Dutch lockdown is indeed in a few respects less strict then in many other countries.
Schools and day cares are closed, but still receive children of essential workers.
Public transportation is still running, though trains, trams and buses are practically empty.
Apart from restaurants bars, cinemas, theatres, etc. there hasn't been a mandatory closure of all businesses, though a lot are closed. Businesses that are still open apply strict rules on social distancing.

Whether this creates any significant additional risk, is anyone's guess.
But the claim about a relatively high mortality rate in the Netherlands, is a total and unsubstantiated shot in the dark...

The mystery of the true coronavirus death rate

Without comprehensive testing and more precision over the cause of fatalities global comparisons should be treated with caution
(https://www.ft.com/content/f3796baf-e4f0-4862-8887-d09c7f706553)

If we look at the numbers on the development of the virus, the alarmist tone in the article is not confirmed by the facts.
The situation in the Netherlands roughly compares with Belgium and Germany, though Germany has a very low number of fatalities in comparison to any European country. The situation is definitely less severe than France, Italy and Spain, and might - depending of future developments there - compare favourable to the UK and the US.

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fdc2ba70c-76af-11ea-af44-daa3def9ae03?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

The spread of the virus has slowed down significantly in the past few days and hopes are that the expanded IC capacity will be sufficient and the use of emergency locations mentioned in the article will not be necessary.
A limited number of patients has been transferred to German hospitals, mainly to take away some pressure on the hospitals in the South of the Netherlands, and because they were closer.

I love the "thrilling" conclusion the end of the article:

"The worry is that the Dutch approach may be based more on aspiration than actual intelligence, and that the Netherlands' "intelligent lockdown" does not make the country immune."

No, as I pointed out before, the current approach will not lead to group immunity.
But the point is, NOBODY claims that it will....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 05, 2020, 05:41:35 AM
Excellent comment Que.

Everyone is too damn certain. (And their certainty strangely aligns with their prior political beliefs too.) And reporters are the most certain of all. There are many considerations, and many balls to juggle. Local conditions matter.
A little epistemic modesty is called for.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 05, 2020, 05:55:49 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 12:17:24 PM
Bring back those 17th century beak masks, I say.

Prague obliges. Snapped by a friend few days ago:

(https://i.imgur.com/WAYGuTC.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 05, 2020, 05:56:35 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 05, 2020, 05:55:49 AM
Prague obliges. Snapped by a friend few days ago:

(https://i.imgur.com/WAYGuTC.png)
???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 05, 2020, 07:05:08 AM
Sweden is an interesting experiment as they are carrying on as normal. I trust we are going down the right path with freedoms curtailed and economies trashed, but supposing as the Spanish flue did a century ago, a more virulent strain returns next year, and again the year after?

If there is an alternative way of managing this crises, I am uneasy that it is not voiced. As said in an article in today's newspaper, a car is lethal and kills millions worldwide but nobody demands banning the car. Being the devil's advocate, we may have to learn to live with coronavirus not defeat it. 


 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 05, 2020, 07:21:34 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 05, 2020, 07:05:08 AM
Sweden is an interesting experiment as they are carrying on as normal. I trust we are going down the right path with freedoms curtailed and economies trashed, but supposing as the Spanish flue did a century ago, a more virulent strain returns next year, and again the year after?

If there is an alternative way of managing this crises, I am uneasy that it is not voiced. As said in an article in today's newspaper, a car is lethal and kills millions worldwide but nobody demands banning the car. Being the devil's advocate, we may have to learn to live with coronavirus not defeat it. 




In the US cars kill 50,000 a year. Coronavirus would kill 2 million, without countermeasures. That's another level.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 05, 2020, 08:18:14 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 05, 2020, 07:05:08 AM
Sweden is an interesting experiment as they are carrying on as normal. I trust we are going down the right path with freedoms curtailed and economies trashed, but supposing as the Spanish flue did a century ago, a more virulent strain returns next year, and again the year after?

If there is an alternative way of managing this crises, I am uneasy that it is not voiced. As said in an article in today's newspaper, a car is lethal and kills millions worldwide but nobody demands banning the car. Being the devil's advocate, we may have to learn to live with coronavirus not defeat it. 


We might indeed have to learn to live with it. That was the firstBrit approach, and it came from serious scientists.  But it's an awfully big bet to say, right now, that we should accept that fate. It's a matter of risk management. We have several arrows in our quiver. If any one of them will prove effective then our current approach will pay big dividends, and that approach would have foregone them. And the dividends are potentially very big indeed. The car numbers are not a good comparison to the potential damage here. Car deaths don't grow exponentially.
If the only hope we had was a vaccine then it might be reasonable to bet it will be a long time in coming. But that's not our only arrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 05, 2020, 09:16:25 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 04, 2020, 12:17:24 PM
Bring back those 17th century beak masks, I say.

Wow, I didn't know what those are called and that those were used by doctors to protect themselves from airbourne diseases! I always assumed those were used by the aristorats amusing themselves by making themselves look like birds!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 05, 2020, 09:24:00 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 05, 2020, 08:18:14 AM
We might indeed have to learn to live with it. That was the firstBrit approach, and it came from serious scientists.  But it's an awfully big bet to say, right now, that we should accept that fate. It's a matter of risk management. We have several arrows in our quiver. If any one of them will prove effective then our current approach will pay big dividends, and that approach would have foregone them. And the dividends are potentially very big indeed. The car numbers are not a good comparison to the potential damage here. Car deaths don't grow exponentially.
If the only hope we had was a vaccine then it might be reasonable to bet it will be a long time in coming. But that's not our only arrow.

I wouldn't say the vaccine is one arrow in our quiver. It is our hydrogen bomb, but we also have several experimental sling shots in the works.

I'm curious AZT, the aids drug, wouldn't be an option. I suspect because AZT targets the HIV reverse transcriptase, and prevents replication. It would not be effective against a virus that uses the native human reverse transcriptase or has a reverse transcriptase that AZT doesn't bind well to for replication.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 09:41:26 AM
London today

https://www.youtube.com/v/CL9E56c4Vx0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 05, 2020, 10:20:09 AM
Quote from: Que on April 05, 2020, 02:32:20 AM
The spread of the virus has slowed down significantly in the past few days and hopes are that the expanded IC capacity will be sufficient and the use of emergency locations mentioned in the article will not be necessary.

In Denmark anesthesiologists say, that it is somewhat surprising that the time a CoVID19 patient needs respirator generally is much longer than for other similar respiratory diseases  - up to 3 - 4 weeks (CoVID19) against about 1 - 2 weeks (Influenza pneumonia) due to more severe lung affection. This may increase the need for respirators rather much. So there is still the risk, that the hospitals become overwhelmed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 10:28:42 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 05, 2020, 10:20:09 AM
In Denmark anesthesiologists say, that it is somewhat surprising that the time a CoVID19 patient needs respirator generally is much longer than for other similar respiratory diseases  - up to 3 - 4 weeks (CoVID19) against about 1 - 2 weeks (Influenza pneumonia) due to more severe lung affection. This may increase the need for respirators rather much. So there is still the risk, that the hospitals become overwhelmed.

Presumably they come off the ventilators with serious damage to lungs and other organs, assuming they survive.

As far as I can see, 15% of people who come down with COVID-19 need hospitalisation, and 30% of these need ventilation -- though I'm not sure what level of ventilation that is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 05, 2020, 11:08:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 10:28:42 AM
Presumably they come off the ventilators with serious damage to lungs and other organs, assuming they survive.

Some of them survive, a Danish physician said yesterday about 50% (I suppose this means with optimal treatment), but of course the longer time in respirator, the more serious are the sequels particularly concerning lasting lung damage.

Quote from: Mandryka
As far as I can see, 15% of people who come down with COVID-19 need hospitalisation, and 30% of these need ventilation -- though I'm not sure what level of ventilation that is.

May be anything from nasal Oxygen (ca. one third) to intensive treatment with respirator (ca. two thirds).

So far we still not know the real number of infected persons, it is not advisable to say which fraction of these needs hospitalisation.

Something I also learned to day, is that about 75% of the patients which need respirator treatment have comorbidity, and diabetes mellitus is by far the most common of these. Preexisting lung disease seems less important.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 05, 2020, 11:22:23 AM
Quote from: deprofundis on April 04, 2020, 08:31:06 AM
I leave you all whit a positive  note to the tread, use eye's protector for insomniac reverse way do a knot in one of the cord for size BAM you got an ideal mask for protection against COVID 19  IT'S DOUBLE TISSUE and confortable for warm weather, Lysol it sometime once or twice a week for sanity & safety of course, I'm not there to judge, we won't miss masks In canada that way whit these additional masks but legit not a gangster masks quite normal looking you can breed and it block you nose  you can also talk whiteout problem. I got this at a local Jean Coutu(local Pharmacy whit the glasse's, purpose of intervention saving life protecting lives.

Thank you!
I found one in my closet, relic of a transatlantic trip in 1994 or so, given out on the plane to help those who wished to, sleep en rote.  Washed it off, scrubbed it with alcohol, and now I'm ready to advertise Laker Airways whenever I go out for groceries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 05, 2020, 12:03:12 PM
I just think this is a wonderful interview with a modern hero, a very articulate doctor working in an intensive care unit in Wales

https://www.youtube.com/v/ejlbCmRJMW4&feature=emb_logo
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 05, 2020, 04:06:04 PM
Boris Johnson admitted to hospital with coronavirus (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/05/boris-johnson-admitted-to-hospital-with-coronavirus)

"Boris Johnson has been admitted to hospital due to coronavirus after suffering 10 days of symptoms including a high fever, bringing doubts about his capability to lead the response to the pandemic despite No 10 insisting it was purely precautionary.

Johnson was taken to an unnamed London hospital on Sunday after days of persistent symptoms, during which time he has been self-isolating. Last week No 10 had denied the prime minister was more seriously ill than claimed.

A Downing Street spokesperson said: "On the advice of his doctor, the prime minister has tonight been admitted to hospital for tests. This is a precautionary step, as the prime minister continues to have persistent symptoms of coronavirus 10 days after testing positive for the virus."

Officials were keen to stress that this was not an emergency admission, and that Johnson will remain in charge of government, and will be in regular touch with colleagues and civil servants."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 05, 2020, 04:47:46 PM
I just read this:  first time that I've heard of the virus going back to animals from humans....https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52177586   :(

From what I heard on the news, they were just being extra careful with the prime minister.  Hope that that is the case.

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 12:08:03 AM
The Queen made a very good speech on TV last night I thought. Best I have heard her deliver.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 06, 2020, 12:33:27 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 12:08:03 AM
The Queen made a very good speech on TV last night I thought. Best I have heard her deliver.

What an inspiring woman! We are lucky to have her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:35:19 AM
This doctor in the video interview emphatically says  a lot of serious patients are "in their fifties or younger".

I cannot help but notice that there is a growing debate in some areas (like the Netherlands) that we should not sacrifice the economy to save the octogenarian population.

This is a false narrative, and it just goes to show how deeply we've sunk after imbibing a toxic mix of neo-liberalism and evolutionary-bio kitsch.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 01:05:24 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 06, 2020, 12:33:27 AM
What an inspiring woman! We are lucky to have her.

I agree Lol.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on April 06, 2020, 01:19:02 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:35:19 AM
This doctor in the video interview emphatically says  a lot of serious patients are "in their fifties or younger".

I cannot help but notice that there is a growing debate in some areas (like the Netherlands) that we should not sacrifice the economy to save the octogenarian population.

This is a false narrative, and it just goes to show how deeply we've sunk after imbibing a toxic mix of neo-liberalism and evolutionary-bio kitsch.

The survival of the fittest.
The survival of the wealthiest.
The survival of the most cunning.

Let's put them in a shelter with Dr. Merkwürdigliebe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 03:31:39 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 06, 2020, 12:33:27 AM
What an inspiring woman! We are lucky to have her.

I just think it's disappointing that anyone in 2020 cares what The Queen says, and I think it's sad that the BBC give her time. Archaic, feudal, quaint . . . I suppose it still has its charm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on April 06, 2020, 04:31:17 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:35:19 AM
a toxic mix of neo-liberalism and evolutionary-bio kitsch.

Fully agreed. Not long ago, this idea would claim for itself the very name of Nazism (combined with other dreadful ideas).  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 04:37:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 03:31:39 AM
I just think it's disappointing that anyone in 2020 cares what The Queen says, and I think it's sad that the BBC give her time. Archaic, feudal, quaint . . . I suppose it still has its charm.

I regard a non-political Head of State as a virtue of our system and not a liability. I'm very pleased that Boris Johnson is not Head of State in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 06, 2020, 05:32:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 04:37:59 AM
I regard a non-political Head of State as a virtue of our system and not a liability. I'm very pleased that Boris Johnson is not Head of State in the UK.

I agree!   :)

Anything is better than a politician as head of state, and that definitely includes the charm of a monarchy.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 06, 2020, 05:41:44 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 04:37:59 AM
I regard a non-political Head of State as a virtue of our system and not a liability.

Quote from: Que on April 06, 2020, 05:32:30 AM
Anything is better than a politician as head of state, and that definitely includes the charm of a monarchy.

Fully agreed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on April 06, 2020, 05:49:39 AM
Ya know, as a proud American, if we had anybody else in the Oval Office, I would be ready to dig out the ole Federalist Papers and argue this point until the cows come home.

The situation being what it is, I'm going to refill my coffee and go back to the morning paper....  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 05:57:05 AM
Quote from: Que on April 06, 2020, 05:32:30 AM

Anything is better than a politician as head of state, and that definitely includes the charm of a monarchy.

Q

Why? What's wrong with an elected head of state?

The problem with HRH  I want to focus on for the moment is this. Her ideas and opinions get the oxygen of publicity, as if they count for something special because of who she is.





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on April 06, 2020, 06:30:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 05:57:05 AM
Why? What's wrong with an elected head of state?

About everything. Elected they will always show a political bias, often at the expense of minorities. With a ceremonial head of state, the very existence of this independent office means an important check & balance, the hallmark of any democracy. Non-political heads of state are often a watchdog for the rule of law & civil rights, opposite the 'democratically elected' head of government who often makes a show of them. Hungarian president Orbán would be better off with such an independent institution above him, as would most of his colleagues. Being elected is not a virtue per se: Hitler was elected and even more popular since then (at the expense of billions he robbed from tiny minorities he put in concentration camps) and so was Mussolini. The latter had at least to reckon - a bit - with the Pope, the former with no-one. Many "elected" heads of state were responsible for the worst atrocities in human history.

Even the US of A would be better off with a parliamentary system & spread responsibilities at the head of the state.  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 06, 2020, 06:42:07 AM
Quote from: Christo on April 06, 2020, 06:30:56 AM
About everything. Elected they will always show a political bias, often at the expense of minorities. With a ceremonial head of state, the very existence of this independent office means an important check & balance, the hallmark of any democracy. Non-political heads of state are often a watchdog for the rule of law & civil rights, opposite the 'democratically elected' head of government who often makes a show of them. Hungarian president Orbán would be better off with such an independent institution above him, as would most of his colleagues. Being elected is not a virtue per se: Hitler was elected and even more popular since then (at the expense of billions he robbed from tiny minorities he put in concentration camps) and so was Mussolini. The latter had at least to reckon - a bit - with the Pope, the former with no-one. Many "elected" heads of state were responsible for the worst atrocities in human history.

This.

Mussolini was never elected, though, he came to power by a semi-coup.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 06, 2020, 07:00:13 AM
Hitler was never elected head of state. That was done some time after his *appointment* as chancellor, through legislative action. Hindenburg was head of state until his death. No election was held to replace him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 06, 2020, 07:08:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 05:57:05 AM
Why? What's wrong with an elected head of state?

The problem with HRH  I want to focus on for the moment is this. Her ideas and opinions get the oxygen of publicity, as if they count for something special because of who she is.

Her Majesty can at least claim the experience of living through WWII, and putting perspective on the current situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 06, 2020, 07:28:02 AM
     Can We Really Develop a Safe, Effective Coronavirus Vaccine? (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QLGeRUi2bZYJ:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/can-we-really-develop-a-safe-effective-coronavirus-vaccine/+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

We need to rigorously test the dozens of vaccine candidates in the running to find one that works, and that will take some serious funding. On average, it may cost $25,000 or more per participant to put a vaccine through clinical trials. It may also take tens of thousands of participants to ensure that a vaccine candidate is effective and safe. That means it would cost upwards of $250 million just to recruit people for a single vaccine candidate. Multiply that $250 million by 10—the minimum number of vaccines, in my view, that must reach this stage—in addition to the costs of research and developing a manufacturing process, and the sum total could be somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 billion.


Quote from: JBS on April 06, 2020, 07:08:02 AM
Her Majesty can at least claim the experience of living through WWII, and putting perspective on the current situation.

     So did the Duke of Windsor.

     Democratic forms must be supported by the populace on an "if you can keep it" basis. People put the substance of self government into the forms designed for that purpose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 06, 2020, 07:44:14 AM
Quote from: Christo on April 06, 2020, 06:30:56 AM
About everything. Elected they will always show a political bias, often at the expense of minorities. With a ceremonial head of state, the very existence of this independent office means an important check & balance, the hallmark of any democracy. Non-political heads of state are often a watchdog for the rule of law & civil rights, opposite the 'democratically elected' head of government who often makes a show of them. Hungarian president Orbán would be better off with such an independent institution above him, as would most of his colleagues. Being elected is not a virtue per se: Hitler was elected and even more popular since then (at the expense of billions he robbed from tiny minorities he put in concentration camps) and so was Mussolini. The latter had at least to reckon - a bit - with the Pope, the former with no-one. Many "elected" heads of state were responsible for the worst atrocities in human history.

Even the US of A would be better off with a parliamentary system & spread responsibilities at the head of the state.  8)
Well, let's not idealise things (and, for the record, I'm a staunch supporter of modern parliamentary monarchies). Monarchies are only as strong and as valuable as the political systems they operate in. If not, ask the Greeks (after the military coup), the Italians (after the fall of Mussolini and the end of WWII) or the Spanish (Alfonso XIII fatal mistake in accepting the Primo de Rivera dictatorship in the twenties). The monarch may be an arbiter, but he or she has virtually no room of manoeuvre, because if he or she actively and publicly exercises that role of arbiter, then he or she will be engaging in politics (which would be self-defeating). Basically , the only step a monarch could take to express his or her position is to threaten abdication, which would be such a bombshell that it would force politicians to re-evaluate their positions. Baudoin of the Belgians did the feat of abdicating and then coming back when the abortion law was passed, and Constantine II of Greece should have abdicated when the military took over (and ultimately the monarchy collapsed as a result of him not having done so). So, the role of a modern monarch is almost like one more symbol (the flag, the anthem...) representing the continuity of the State and its institutions, but one they citizens (no longer subjects)  can relate to and probably respect because of the experience, international exposure and recognition, etc. of the monarch.

Power brokering and forcing meetings etc. behind the scenes is, of course, another matter (and probably, a very valuable one). Very few politicians would refuse a meeting with the monarch if summoned to the palace.

So, ¡viva el Rey!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 07:44:31 AM
Has the King of the Netherlands, and the King of Belgium been given the opportunity to address their people about COVID? I just wonder if all monarchies are conceived of in the same way as the British.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 07:48:19 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:35:19 AM
This doctor in the video interview emphatically says  a lot of serious patients are "in their fifties or younger".

I cannot help but notice that there is a growing debate in some areas (like the Netherlands) that we should not sacrifice the economy to save the octogenarian population.

This is a false narrative, and it just goes to show how deeply we've sunk after imbibing a toxic mix of neo-liberalism and evolutionary-bio kitsch.

Ugh. That nonsense one expects from a Texan ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 07:49:18 AM
Quote from: Marc on April 06, 2020, 01:19:02 AM
The survival of the fittest.
The survival of the wealthiest.
The survival of the most cunning.

Let's put them in a shelter with Dr. Merkwürdigliebe.

We must not allow a Mine-Shaft Gap!!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 07:50:37 AM
Quote from: j winter on April 06, 2020, 05:49:39 AM
Ya know, as a proud American, if we had anybody else in the Oval Office, I would be ready to dig out the ole Federalist Papers and argue this point until the cows come home.

The situation being what it is, I'm going to refill my coffee and go back to the morning paper....  :(

I raise a mug of coffee to you, friend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 06, 2020, 07:55:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 07:44:31 AM
Has the King of the Netherlands, and the King of Belgium been given the opportunity to address their people about COVID? I just wonder if all monarchies are conceived of in the same way as the British.
The King of Spain did (early on—March 19th) to a generally positive reaction among the people, across the political spectrum (except, of course, for the Catalan separatists—but they wouod have reacted the same way if it had been the President of a hypothetical Spanish republic who had spoken).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on April 06, 2020, 08:00:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 07:44:31 AM
Has the King of the Netherlands .. been given the opportunity to address their people about COVID? I just wonder if all monarchies are conceived of in the same way as the British.
The King is entitled to decide it on his own and yes, he did, a week ago. The "monarchy" - the Netherlands is better defined as a republic with a hereditary, symbolic head of state - functions roughly comparable to the British, though Sweden makes a better comparison.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 08:06:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 05:57:05 AM
Why? What's wrong with an elected head of state?

The problem with HRH  I want to focus on for the moment is this. Her ideas and opinions get the oxygen of publicity, as if they count for something special because of who she is.

Like President Putin?

I do not entirely disagree with your second point but she has been broadcasting to the British people since 1940 and exemplifies a sense of duty and service. That has to count for something I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 06, 2020, 08:18:50 AM
     Undocumented workers among those hit first — and worst — by the coronavirus shutdown (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/05/undocumented-immigrants-coronavirus/)

     We've never needed them more.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 06, 2020, 08:32:34 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 06, 2020, 08:18:50 AM
     Undocumented workers among those hit first — and worst — by the coronavirus shutdown[ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/05/undocumented-immigrants-coronavirus/)

     We've never needed them more.

One thing I have to see, and am surprised I haven't seen it yet: someone from the Right complaining that undocumented workers are getting treated (for COVID19) instead of Real Amerikans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 06, 2020, 09:36:21 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 06, 2020, 07:08:02 AM
Her Majesty can at least claim the experience of living through WWII, and putting perspective on the current situation.

A perspective born of long experience.

« The address was a brief but stirring tutorial in leadership (...) Leadership separate from politics », quips the Washington Post:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/06/with-britain-crisis-queen-elizabeth-breaks-her-usual-silence/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/06/with-britain-crisis-queen-elizabeth-breaks-her-usual-silence/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 06, 2020, 09:47:17 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 07:44:31 AM
Has the King of the Netherlands, and the King of Belgium been given the opportunity to address their people about COVID? I just wonder if all monarchies are conceived of in the same way as the British.

This is how Philip did it. He never was a really fluent speaker nor a charismatic person.

https://www.youtube.com/v/0aCA3M1BybI
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 06, 2020, 09:54:20 AM
I imagine he gave the speech in the three official languages, Peter?

Of course, there's also the King of Thailand , who has taken a rather different attitude: https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-luxury-hotel-thailand-king-rama-isolating-coronavirus-bavaria-germany-2020-4?IR=T
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 06, 2020, 10:13:15 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 06, 2020, 09:54:20 AM
I imagine he gave the speech in the three official languages, Peter?

Of course, there's also the King of Thailand , who has taken a rather different attitude: https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-luxury-hotel-thailand-king-rama-isolating-coronavirus-bavaria-germany-2020-4?IR=T

One has to feel sorry with the Thai, after the long reign of the reverred Bhumibol they're now stuck with a brainless playboy....

Back on topic.... Good news from the Netherlands:

https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2020/04/hospital-admissions-continue-to-fall-as-dutch-ramp-up-corona-testing/

Q



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 06, 2020, 10:22:42 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 06, 2020, 09:54:20 AM
I imagine he gave the speech in the three official languages, Peter?

Of course, there's also the King of Thailand , who has taken a rather different attitude: https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-luxury-hotel-thailand-king-rama-isolating-coronavirus-bavaria-germany-2020-4?IR=T

No, only French and Flemish. Our German speaking community is (probably) considered too small for (even) more linguistic brouhaha.
Philip's Flemish isn't that bad (almost no accent), but he speaks French more fluently.
Too bad he is such a colourless, stiff, humourless figure. Otoh, one could say, that it is a blessing that he doesn't try to be funny or a flamboyant orator.
And, Queen Mathilde has had an immensely good influence on his behaviour. She's rather cool.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German-speaking_Community_of_Belgium
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 06, 2020, 10:38:23 AM
Quote from: pjme on April 06, 2020, 10:22:42 AM
No, only French and Flemish. Our German speaking community is (probably) considered too small for (even) more linguistic brouhaha.
Philip's Flemish isn't that bad (almost no accent), but he speaks French more fluently.
Too bad he is such a colourless, stiff, humourless figure. Fortunately, one could say, that he doesn't try to be a flamboyant orator.
And, Queen Mathilde has had an immensely good influence on his behaviour. She's rather cool.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German-speaking_Community_of_Belgium
Thanks. Most interesting. :)

Quote from: Que on April 06, 2020, 10:13:15 AM
...
Back on topic.... Good news from the Netherlands:

https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2020/04/hospital-admissions-continue-to-fall-as-dutch-ramp-up-corona-testing/
...
Good news indeed. Also in Spain, the number of new (confirmed) infections and of deceased has decreased over the past three days, meaning that the health system is under less strain.

The flip side is that the good weather and the upcoming Easter holidays are prompting some to be less disciplined and respectful of the stay-at-home regulations. The police seems to have prevented almost all attempts of city dwellers to drive to their second homes on the coast or in the country, but we've seen bizarre things like some inhabitants of small towns staging makeshift processions (which are a big thing during the Holy Week in most of Spain). These processions, in any case, were caricatures of the real thing snd immediately dissolved by the police (and all participants subject to hefty fines).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 06, 2020, 10:43:54 AM
Took an afternoon bicycle ride into central Copenhagen, was glad to see that social distancing was working, luckily. There is a maximum gathering of 10 people under all circumstances, including say at burials and so on, and it is being enforced by police.

Even on a sunny Spring day like this, there were no groups of more than 5-6 people (youngsters in the parks, of course), but almost everyone I saw were 1-2-3 people only.

Rush hour traffic, bicycle groups and car traffic generally, was almost gone, eating places are closed, except for some take-away; education places, department stores and most shops as well as sights are also closed, etc.

Normally these scenes would be very busy with people. Public transport also has very few passengers. It is eerie of course, but much more disciplined, at least around 5 PM, than I'd expected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 10:56:49 AM
"NEW YORK (AP) — The steep rise in coronavirus deaths in New York seems to be leveling off in a possible sign that social distancing is working in the most lethal hot spot in the U.S., the governor said Monday — a trend that appears to have taken hold more convincingly in hard-hit Italy and Spain.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo warned that this is no time to relax the restrictions aimed at keeping people from getting too close to one another, and he ordered bigger fines against violators.

"The numbers look like it may be turning. `Yay, it's over!' No, it's not. And other places have made that mistake," he said."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 10:58:12 AM
Coronavirus death toll tops 10,000 in US; New York City considers mass grave in park for coronavirus victims
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2020, 10:58:47 AM
Experts expect that coronavirus hospitalizations in Massachusetts will peak between April 10 and April 20, Governor Baker said Thursday.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 06, 2020, 11:13:33 AM
In my neck of the woods

QuoteA widely used model of the impact of coronavirus now shows Florida's peak in deaths will come earlier — and be higher — than previously estimated. The model, which has been updated about once a week, previously had projected a peak in early May, with 136 deaths a day.

The University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Sunday update shows Florida's peak is expected on April 21, at which point the state will see 242 deaths per day.

On Monday morning, the total number of deaths in Florida from the new coronavirus stood at 236, an increase of 22% from Saturday morning.

At least 13,324 people have now tested positive for the new coronavirus across Florida, the state Department of of Health reported Monday morning, an increase of about of 974 cases from Sunday evening.

At midday Monday, Miami-Dade had the largest number, 4,481, of total cases. Broward had 2,067 cases and Palm Beach County had 1,069.
As of Monday morning, Palm Beach County had recorded 49 deaths, Broward had 46, and Miami-Dade County 38.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/coronavirus/fl-ne-florida-coronavirus-monday-updates-20200406-wzumka6t6bdx3cendmcks52mxq-story.html
In part the increase in cases simply corresponds to the increase in testing.

[I live in Broward County.]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on April 06, 2020, 11:43:03 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52192604

Not looking good for Boris Johnson. I don't like the man as a politician, but bless him. Fingers crossed he survives it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 06, 2020, 12:17:52 PM
Quote from: Marc on April 06, 2020, 11:43:03 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52192604

Not looking good for Boris Johnson. I don't like the man as a politician, but bless him. Fingers crossed he survives it.

Nor I. But I think it's obvious he needs to stop trying to lead the country and concentrate on getting better. The two demands seem at war with each other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 12:35:43 PM
Quote from: Iota on April 06, 2020, 12:17:52 PM
Nor I. But I think it's obvious he needs to stop trying to lead the country and concentrate on getting better. The two demands seem at war with each other.

Being tired can't help, and I guess he's a bit of a porker too, but who knows what causes this excessive immune system response after 10 days. There but for the grace of God go I.

Do we know whether he's receiving mechanical ventilation?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:40:58 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 07:44:31 AM
Has the King of the Netherlands, and the King of Belgium been given the opportunity to address their people about COVID? I just wonder if all monarchies are conceived of in the same way as the British.

The Dutch King (a mere lad) has spoken on tv.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 12:48:56 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:40:58 PM
The Dutch King (a mere lad) has spoken on tv.

I think the Queen's speech was very good, though it pains me to say it. She's the closest we've got in the UK to an inspirational leader ??????
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 06, 2020, 01:30:01 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 12:48:56 PM
She's the closest we've got in the UK to an inspirational leader ??????

Count your blessings!  :)

Charles survived the virus, so he is/might be up next....  ???  ;)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 06, 2020, 01:41:39 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 06, 2020, 10:43:54 AM
Took an afternoon bicycle ride into central Copenhagen, was glad to see that social distancing was working, luckily. There is a maximum gathering of 10 people under all circumstances, including say at burials and so on, and it is being enforced by police.

Thanks for the nice pictures from Copenhagen, where I lived the first 30 years of my life. I wasn't aware that you are a newly registered countryman, but welcome here in the forum. Hope you will enjoy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 06, 2020, 01:47:20 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 12:35:43 PM
Being tired can't help, and I guess he's a bit of a porker too, but who knows what causes this excessive immune system response after 10 days. There but for the grace of God go I.

Do we know whether he's receiving mechanical ventilation?

We were told by Danish TV, that he isn't in respirator so far (about 8½ PM).

The insidious and not quite uncommon fact about CoVID19 is, that you may have mild symptoms for about a  week and then suddenly get worse.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 06, 2020, 01:58:01 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 06, 2020, 12:40:58 PM
The Dutch King (a mere lad) has spoken on tv.
????
Willem Alexander will be 53 on april 27th. His corona speech was well received:  https://youtu.be/SWLyu_F35W4

the Belgian king Philip turned 60 on april 15th.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 06, 2020, 02:01:38 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 06, 2020, 01:41:39 PM
Thanks for the nice pictures from Copenhagen, where I lived the first 30 years of my life. I wasn't aware that you are a newly registered countryman, but welcome here in the forum. Hope you will enjoy.

Thank you, yes, I moved to the capital back in the mid-80s.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 06, 2020, 02:04:17 PM
Quote from: pjme on April 06, 2020, 01:58:01 PM
????
Willem Alexander will be 53 on april 27th. His corona speech was well received:  https://youtu.be/SWLyu_F35W4

the Belgian king Philip turned 60 on april 15th.
Yeah, had to check that. But it was probably meant 'by comparison' (with the British Queen).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 06, 2020, 02:04:29 PM
To day we were told by our PM (Mette Frederiksen) that Denmark will open up a bit after Easter. The first things to open are the child care and the schools (only from class 1 to 5), which means that children from 0 years to about 10 years of age are included. It presupposes that measures like social distancing and hand-washing et. c. is strictly maintained. Still this will inevitably lead to more virus spread in the society, but also to more herd immunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 06, 2020, 02:10:27 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 06, 2020, 02:04:29 PM
To day we were told by our PM (Mette Frederiksen) that Denmark will open up a bit after Easter. The first things to open are the child care and the schools (only from class 1 to 5), which means that children from 0 years to about 10 years of age are included. It presupposes that measures like social distancing and hand-washing et. c. is strictly maintained. Still this will inevitably lead to more virus spread in the society, but also to more herd immunity.

Yes. However, all large gatherings, concerts and festivals must also be cancelled until as late as September. A somewhat complicated strategy, it seems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 06, 2020, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 06, 2020, 12:35:43 PM
Do we know whether he's receiving mechanical ventilation?

According to the BBC Ten-O-Clock news, no, and as I write, the website makes no mention of any change. He had apparently been moved to intensive care 'just as a precaution'.

I wish him well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 06, 2020, 02:40:15 PM
You can't use ventilators without sedatives. Now the US is running out of those, too. (https://www.vox.com/2020/4/6/21209589/coronavirus-medicine-ventilators-drug-shortage-sedatives-covid-19)

"Ambulance and emergency sirens in New York City are wailing ceaselessly this month, as the number of reported deaths from Covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, in the state surpassed 4,100 as of April 6. (Public health experts say that these tallies are severely undercounting the total.)

As one of the hardest-hit locations in the US so far, the city is scrambling to find enough ventilators — equipment that gets oxygen into the lungs of severe Covid-19 patients having trouble breathing on their own — for the expected surge in patients. Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a press conference April 4 that the state had ordered 17,000 ventilators from the federal government, but "that order never came through."

Although New York City may be the first city in the country to run out of ventilators, other cities are expected to follow. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy recently tweeted, "Ventilators are our #1 need right now. I won't stop fighting to get us the equipment we need to save every life we can." Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards predicted that his state would run out of ventilators by April 6.

But to save a Covid-19 patient's life with a ventilator, you also need an ample supply of medications, both to be able to use the machine and to prevent agonizing pain. Experts say there's a worrisome shortage of those, too — one that's only expected to grow worse.

"The minute you talk about ventilators you need to talk about medications," says Esther Choo, an associate professor of emergency medicine at Oregon Health & Science University. Choo says hospitals are already running out of medications like fentanyl, versed, propofol, and even neuromuscular blockades, what she calls "everyday bread and butter medications," the drugs needed to induce and maintain sedation while on a ventilator. "Ventilators can't really be used without these medications."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 06, 2020, 02:45:23 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 06, 2020, 02:40:15 PM
You can't use ventilators without sedatives. Now the US is running out of those, too. (https://www.vox.com/2020/4/6/21209589/coronavirus-medicine-ventilators-drug-shortage-sedatives-covid-19)

"Ambulance and emergency sirens in New York City are wailing ceaselessly this month, as the number of reported deaths from Covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, in the state surpassed 4,100 as of April 6. (Public health experts say that these tallies are severely undercounting the total.)

As one of the hardest-hit locations in the US so far, the city is scrambling to find enough ventilators — equipment that gets oxygen into the lungs of severe Covid-19 patients having trouble breathing on their own — for the expected surge in patients. Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a press conference April 4 that the state had ordered 17,000 ventilators from the federal government, but "that order never came through."

Although New York City may be the first city in the country to run out of ventilators, other cities are expected to follow. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy recently tweeted, "Ventilators are our #1 need right now. I won't stop fighting to get us the equipment we need to save every life we can." Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards predicted that his state would run out of ventilators by April 6.

But to save a Covid-19 patient's life with a ventilator, you also need an ample supply of medications, both to be able to use the machine and to prevent agonizing pain. Experts say there's a worrisome shortage of those, too — one that's only expected to grow worse.

"The minute you talk about ventilators you need to talk about medications," says Esther Choo, an associate professor of emergency medicine at Oregon Health & Science University. Choo says hospitals are already running out of medications like fentanyl, versed, propofol, and even neuromuscular blockades, what she calls "everyday bread and butter medications," the drugs needed to induce and maintain sedation while on a ventilator. "Ventilators can't really be used without these medications."[...]

Obvious really, but I hadn't thought of it.
Screwing with the supply chain is dangerous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 03:02:17 PM
Quote from: Iota on April 06, 2020, 12:17:52 PM
Nor I. But I think it's obvious he needs to stop trying to lead the country and concentrate on getting better. The two demands seem at war with each other.
Yes, I agree. It was fairly clear that his condition was worse than we were being told. They need to be straight with us rather than drip-feeding misleading information.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 03:03:03 PM
Quote from: Marc on April 06, 2020, 11:43:03 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52192604

Not looking good for Boris Johnson. I don't like the man as a politician, but bless him. Fingers crossed he survives it.
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 06, 2020, 11:20:26 PM
Quote from: pjme on April 06, 2020, 01:58:01 PM
????
Willem Alexander will be 53 on april 27th. His corona speech was well received:  https://youtu.be/SWLyu_F35W4

the Belgian king Philip turned 60 on april 15th.

I know it's puzzling. I guess I said "a mere lad" because (for me) it's kind of hard to take words of comfort and succour from a person who has never had to lift a finger and whose public speaking skills (in terms of looking like a real human being) are not overwhelming.

The prime minister is really the person for this job. Not that he's my kind of guy (both the king and the PM were at the same college at the same time as I) but at least he can be held accountable for things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 06, 2020, 11:50:09 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 08:06:04 AM
Like President Putin?

I do not entirely disagree with your second point but she has been broadcasting to the British people since 1940 and exemplifies a sense of duty and service. That has to count for something I think.

Also counts for something Jeffrey that 28 million watched the speech live. Add a few million more on "catch-up".

I think it fine to criticise the monarchy but to criticise the monarch the Queen does not stand up to scrutiny in my book.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 02:27:29 AM
Quote from: Marc on April 06, 2020, 11:43:03 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52192604

Not looking good for Boris Johnson. I don't like the man as a politician, but bless him. Fingers crossed he survives it.

Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2020, 03:03:03 PM
+1

-1. He's getting the best possible care while others risk – and lose – their lives due to his incompetence. As much as I would like, I can't muster any sympathy for someone directly responsible for so much suffering.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 02:39:14 AM
Navarro memos warning of mass coronavirus death circulated in January (https://www.axios.com/exclusive-navarro-deaths-coronavirus-memos-january-da3f08fb-dce1-4f69-89b5-ea048f8382a9.html)

Quote from: AxiosIn late January, President Trump's economic adviser Peter Navarro warned his White House colleagues the novel coronavirus could take more than half a million American lives and cost close to $6 trillion, according to memos obtained by Axios.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 07, 2020, 03:29:40 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 06, 2020, 11:50:09 PM
Also counts for something Jeffrey that 28 million watched the speech live. Add a few million more on "catch-up".

I think it fine to criticise the monarchy but to criticise the monarch the Queen does not stand up to scrutiny in my book.

Totally agree with you Lol - you explain it more clearly than I did.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 07, 2020, 04:26:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 07, 2020, 03:29:40 AM
Totally agree with you Lol - you explain it more clearly than I did.
From this side of the 'puddle', I've held a great deal of respect for your queen for many years...my parents did too.  And I watched her speech (youtube) in full and was very impressed by her dignity, composure, calmness and strength and her valiant attempts to calm and inspire her fellow citizens.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 07, 2020, 05:02:02 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 02:27:29 AM
-1. He's getting the best possible care while others risk – and lose – their lives due to his incompetence. As much as I would like, I can't muster any sympathy for someone directly responsible for so much suffering.

Well, in the first place I hope BoJo gets out of ICU and survives in some form (some ex-ICU patients have a lot of lung damage). He's got a pregnant partner at home.

On the other hand someone here praised his stoic continuing to shake hands, the way politicians do. Well, that was just plain irresponsible, and one would like a politician to be responsible in the first place. For others and for himself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 07, 2020, 05:13:04 AM
There is a good article in latest The New Yorker about research into remedies at various universities.

Turns out big pharma componies do very little research into viral remedies / vaccines, because the most recent viral epidemics were relatively shortlived one-time events, which means that there is insufficient return on investment.

Thanks, market-based thinking. This is the reason why we need to look to university research.

The labs in the New Yorker article aren't so much looking for a vaccine, but an antiviral that takes out vital parts of the virus, and some are looking for a way to affect the host body (= us) in such a microscopic manner that a virus just cannot land. And all are looking for a way to make a kind of universal antiviral that will kill future coronaviruses, too  -  since it's pretty certain there will be a new potential epidemic in a couple of years, with a different virus. This broader application will make it more viable commercially, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 06:41:52 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 02:27:29 AM
-1. He's getting the best possible care while others risk – and lose – their lives due to his incompetence. As much as I would like, I can't muster any sympathy for someone directly responsible for so much suffering.

Wishing death and suffering on someone, which is precisely what your -1 means, is despicable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 07, 2020, 06:50:31 AM
   
Quote from: Herman on April 07, 2020, 05:13:04 AM
There is a good article in latest The New Yorker about research into remedies at various universities.

Turns out big pharma componies do very little research into viral remedies / vaccines, because the most recent viral epidemics were relatively shortlived one-time events, which means that there is insufficient return on investment.

Thanks, market-based thinking. This is the reason why we need to look to university research.

The labs in the New Yorker article aren't so much looking for a vaccine, but an antiviral that takes out vital parts of the virus, and some are looking for a way to affect the host body (= us) in such a microscopic manner that a virus just cannot land. And all are looking for a way to make a kind of universal antiviral that will kill future coronaviruses, too  -  since it's pretty certain there will be a new potential epidemic in a couple of years, with a different virus. This broader application will make it more viable commercially, too.

      There needs to be more public in public health. The return on public investment is high, because it raises the return on private investment. Healthy people are productive, for themselves and everyone else.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 07, 2020, 07:24:48 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 06:41:52 AM
Wishing death and suffering on someone, which is precisely what your -1 means, is despicable.

Thanks for saying that. Saves me having to.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 07, 2020, 07:32:53 AM

     At least half of covid-19 patients on ventilators don't make it (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-health-202/2020/04/07/the-health-202-at-least-of-covid-19-patients-on-ventilators-don-t-make-it/5e8b91bc88e0fa101a75bede/)

     Note that this is not the case for all patients on ventilators.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 08:08:16 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 06:41:52 AM
Wishing death and suffering on someone, which is precisely what your -1 means, is despicable.

Hear, hear!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 08:11:04 AM
Food for thought about ventilators here

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/Ventilators-aren-t-a-panacea-for-a-pandemic-like-coronavirus

I'm beginning to think that if, God forbid, I'm offered a ventilator, I'd refuse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 09:11:26 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 06:41:52 AM
Wishing death and suffering on someone, which is precisely what your -1 means, is despicable.

I don't wish him anything. I just don't feel any sympathy for his ordeal, while the country suffers because of him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 09:27:31 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 09:11:26 AM
I don't wish him anything. I just don't feel any sympathy for his ordeal, while the country suffers because of him.

As if he was the absolute dictator of the UK and nothing whatever was done, or not done, unless he so ordered. As if the "herd immunity" strategy was of his own making and lots of Imperial College scientists had got nothing to do with it. As if all those people who filled London's parks on Sunday did so on his orders. As if his ordeal was an atonement that would end all other Britons' ordeal.

You try to find excuses for your untenable position but you only make it worse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 09:55:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 09:27:31 AM
As if he was the absolute dictator of the UK and nothing whatever was done, or not done, unless he so ordered. As if the "herd immunity" strategy was of his own making and lots of Imperial College scientists had got nothing to do with it. As if all those people who filled London's parks on Sunday did so on his orders. As if his ordeal was an atonement that would end all other Britons' ordeal.

You try to find excuses for your untenable position but you only make it worse.

So because he's not the singular ruler, he's exempt of responsibility? He and the politics that he represents and fights for is what led Britain to where it is now.

I'm not excusing myself and I applaud everybody who's able to extend warmth to people who cause harm. I can't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:00:33 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 09:55:58 AM
So because he's not the singular ruler, he's exempt of responsibility? He and the politics that he represents and fights for is what led Britain to where it is now.

Spain is much worse than UK. I suppose you firmly condemn and despise the politics Pedro Sanchez represents and fights for, too.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:14:56 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 09:11:26 AM
I don't wish him anything. I just don't feel any sympathy for his ordeal, while the country suffers because of him.
I am sorry, but look at the words to which you applied a -1.

I am ignoring you henceforth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 07, 2020, 10:15:51 AM
Another researchy thing from the hospitals: there is a large percentage of overweight corona patients in ICU. High BMI seems to be a causal factor.

People are starting to think too much fat affects the immune system which is why there are so many overweight people in ICU's.

This could be very bad news for the USA.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:17:13 AM


Quote from: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:00:33 AM
Spain is much worse than UK. I suppose you firmly condemn and despise the politics Pedro Sanchez represents and fights for, too.

As ever: that doesn't follow.

And I'm with Rinaldo here. I don't wish death on BoJo The Clown but I've little sympathy for someone who is most probably sick due to his own bad policies and who most likely previously thought this couldn't happen to an Etonian.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:20:47 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:17:13 AM
As ever: that doesn't follow.

And I'm with Rinaldo here. I don't wish death on BoJo The Clown but I've little sympathy for someone who is most probably sick due to his own bad policies and who most likely previously thought this couldn't happen to an Etonian.
You were gloating about Rand Paul testing positive. This is also an odious post.

I think perhaps this group is not for me. Better Beethoven alone than Beethoven in such company.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:26:31 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:20:47 AM
You were gloating about Rand Paul testing positive. This is also an odious post.

I think perhaps this group is not for me. Better Beethoven alone than Beethoven in such company.

Saying its hard to have sympathy isn't "gloating". Its not like I'm sitting here with a big grin on my face at the news. But BoJo's idiot policies and flip flopping have now caused needless suffering beyond the necessary - and is almost certainly the reason a large number of Britons aren't taking this as seriously as they should.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 07, 2020, 10:28:07 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:17:13 AM

I don't wish death on BoJo The Clown but I've little sympathy for someone who is most probably sick due to his own bad policies and who most likely previously thought this couldn't happen to an Etonian.

Do not judge him too strictly. He might still have contracted the virus no matter how much the UK was closed down. I also consider him a clown, but even clowns have a right to live, and I wish him a fast and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:30:24 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:26:31 AM
Saying its hard to have sympathy isn't "gloating". Its not like I'm sitting here with a big grin on my face at the news. But BoJo's idiot policies and flip flopping have now caused needless suffering beyond the necessary -

What would be the right amount of necessary suffering, in your estimation?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:33:11 AM
I take it then that if the Swedish PM gets sick he deserves it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 07, 2020, 10:34:04 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 07, 2020, 10:15:51 AM
Another researchy thing from the hospitals: there is a large percentage of overweight corona patients in ICU. High BMI seems to be a causal factor.

People are starting to think too much fat affects the immune system which is why there are so many overweight people in ICU's.

This could be very bad news for the USA.

Yes, overweight and diabetes seem to be very common among corona patients needing respirator assistance. Apart from a possible effect upon the immune system, overweight doesn't make it easier to breathe because of compression of the lungs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:35:52 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:33:11 AM
I take it then that if the Swedish PM gets sick he deserves it.

No, because he's a social-democrat. Only conservatives deserve it.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:36:21 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:30:24 AM
What would be the right amount of necessary suffering, in your estimation?

Zero. Obviously. Think BoJo agrees?

Once more: don't wish him dead. Just no sympathy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:39:41 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 07, 2020, 10:36:21 AM
Zero. Obviously.

It's not obvious at all from your post: you wrote "suffering beyond necessary", which logically implies there is a necessary suffering.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on April 07, 2020, 10:47:25 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 07, 2020, 10:33:11 AM
I take it then that if the Swedish PM gets sick he deserves it.

Personally, I would never say such a thing.

Well.... ::)

But when I read yesterday that this weekend the Swedes were still having loads of fun, grouping together on terraces in Stockholm and Göteborg, I was (again) baffled.
Apparently, they think it's the wisest thing to do.
And who's to know actually? It's become clear that a majority of governments and even medical advice groups were not seriously prepared for this. For the USA, it's truly a pity that the Pandemic Unit, created in in 2014, was wiped aside in 2017.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 07, 2020, 10:50:30 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:39:41 AM
It's not obvious at all from your post: you wrote "suffering beyond necessary", which logically implies there is a necessary suffering.

But no implication that the necessity adheres to any human agent.

Where there is a pandemic assailing tens of thousands there will of necessity be suffering
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 11:32:16 AM
I hope you never need to find this video useful

https://www.youtube.com/v/HwLzAdriec0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 12:57:13 PM
Israel Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, who previously claimed that the coronavirus was "divine punishment against homosexuality," has tested positive for the virus.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2020/04/israel-health-minister-who-called-covid-19-divine-punishment-tests-positive-for-virus/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on April 07, 2020, 12:59:56 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 12:57:13 PM
Israel Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, who previously claimed that the coronavirus was "divine punishment against homosexuality," has tested positive for the virus.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2020/04/israel-health-minister-who-called-covid-19-divine-punishment-tests-positive-for-virus/

And now he can claim that he was assaulted by a homosexual disease, hence the more reason to lock them all up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 07, 2020, 01:03:11 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 12:57:13 PM
Israel Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, who previously claimed that the coronavirus was "divine punishment against homosexuality," has tested positive for the virus.

I have always thought this honor was reserved for gay plague. >:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 07, 2020, 01:05:40 PM
Hingham man is slowly recovering from coronavirus after 'being so sick — on his deathbed,' his wife says (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/07/metro/hingham-man-slowly-recovering-covid-19-after-being-so-sick-his-deathbed-wife-says/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 07, 2020, 01:09:21 PM
Who gets a ventilator? New gut-wrenching state guidelines issued on rationing equipment, ICU beds (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/07/metro/massachusetts-officials-release-plan-ration-ventilators-icu-beds-if-need-arises/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 01:21:08 PM
Quote from: Florestan on April 07, 2020, 10:00:33 AM
Spain is much worse than UK. I suppose you firmly condemn and despise the politics Pedro Sanchez represents and fights for, too.

I don't follow Spanish politics, nor your logic on this comparison.

But to be absolutely clear, no one's talking about anybody 'deserving' the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 07, 2020, 01:24:20 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 07, 2020, 01:03:11 PM
I have always thought this honor was reserved for gay plague. >:D

Here in the US, there's always some pastor ready to declare that a hangnail is divine punishment for tolerating homosexuality (and maybe feminists and secularism).  I think I've put my angry atheist phase well behind me, but the news cycle tends to cough up stories that make it challenge fairly often.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 07, 2020, 02:30:14 PM

     I drove by a church today and gave it a dirty look, and I think it wobbled a little.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Marc on April 07, 2020, 02:58:06 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 07, 2020, 02:30:14 PM
     I drove by a church today and gave it a dirty look, and I think it wobbled a little.

Oh... my... gawd. :o
(Runs to his 1980s cd-player and quickly throws a Bach Passion in.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 07, 2020, 03:33:35 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 07, 2020, 02:30:14 PM
     I drove by a church today and gave it a dirty look, and I think it wobbled a little.

You do, do you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 07, 2020, 03:47:24 PM
Quote from: Marc on April 07, 2020, 02:58:06 PM
Oh... my... gawd. :o
(Runs to his 1980s cd-player and quickly throws a Bach Passion in.)

Historically informed playback of historically informed performance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 07, 2020, 05:05:22 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 07, 2020, 12:57:13 PM
Israel Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, who previously claimed that the coronavirus was "divine punishment against homosexuality," has tested positive for the virus.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2020/04/israel-health-minister-who-called-covid-19-divine-punishment-tests-positive-for-virus/

Addendum has been added to that story
QuoteAn earlier version of this article referenced reports regarding Yaakov Litzman blaming the coronavirus pandemic on homosexuality. The validity of this attribution is in dispute, and out of an abundance of caution that element of the story has been removed

Litzman represents the Orthodox extreme. 
The Talmudic perspective on diseases like this straddles the issue.  Pestilence is a divine punishment, but once it is set loose in the world  the righteous are imperilled by it just as much as anyone else.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 07, 2020, 08:29:59 PM
U.S. Feds are seizing coronavirus equipment ordered by hospitals:

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-04-07/hospitals-washington-seize-coronavirus-supplies
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 12:06:11 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 07, 2020, 01:21:08 PM
I don't follow Spanish politics, nor your logic on this comparison.

Let's see. The situation in Spain is much worse than that in UK. Compare:

Spain: 141.942 cases, 14.045 deaths.
UK: 55.242 cases, 6159 deaths

(source: Worldometer)

Now, if you claim that Boris Johnson and his policies are directly responsible for the UK situation you should apply the same reasoning to Spain as well and come to the conclusion that Pedro Sanchez and his policies are directly responsible for the Spanish disaster.

But no, of course you won't do that, because Pedro Sanchez is a Socialist and by definition Socialists cannot do anything wrong. All blame to Johnson is okay, though, because he's a Conservative and by definition Conservatives do everything wrong.

And that's my final post on this issue.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 12:59:55 AM
Donald Trump blames WHO for dire situation in the US, threatens to pull funding, saying the global body is "China centric" and "biased" towards the rival superpower.


https://www.theguardian.com/global/video/2020/apr/08/donald-trump-blames-who-for-dire-situation-in-the-us-threatens-to-pull-funding-video
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 08, 2020, 01:21:30 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 12:06:11 AM
Let's see. The situation in Spain is much worse than that in UK. Compare:

You know they cannot compared just by picking current numbers, right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 01:24:13 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 07, 2020, 04:26:21 AM
From this side of the 'puddle', I've held a great deal of respect for your queen for many years...my parents did too.  And I watched her speech (youtube) in full and was very impressed by her dignity, composure, calmness and strength and her valiant attempts to calm and inspire her fellow citizens.

PD

Thank you PD!  :)
Hope you and your family are keeping safe.

I discovered a nice 5 and a half mile country walk from the house which saves having to drive anywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 08, 2020, 03:22:00 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 01:24:13 AMI discovered a nice 5 and a half mile country walk from the house which saves having to drive anywhere.

That's very handy :). We're driving 8 miles to a deserted bit of countryside that's also near two quiet shops. The walks from our door would be more crowded even though the council have now barricaded the vehicle entrance to one of the largest areas of open land.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 08, 2020, 03:27:41 AM
A big factor in Spain's awful corona situation is not socialists or conservatives in power, but the governamental structure of the country.

The regions are firmly separated from each other. They are autonomous. So Catalonia cannot ask Aragon (the region to the west) or the Valencian Community, to the south, if they can spare some ICU beds for Catalonian patients, the way the Netherlands and Germany have done. The region borders are impenetrable.

In this situation that's costing lives.

In a broader sense Spain is a very bureaucratic country, there are endless lengths of red tape and everything needs to be fiatted by a whole range of career bureaucrats (who often sat for their state exams to eventually enter the civil service for many many years  -  a cousin of my ex did these exams every frigging year until she was 37 and gave up) before anything happens.

A totally different factor is Spanish men of the baby boom generation and older are really heavy smokers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on April 08, 2020, 03:41:26 AM
An article analysing thoroughly the response of the UK scientists and government since the start of the events :

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci/special-report-johnson-listened-to-his-scientists-about-coronavirus-but-they-were-slow-to-sound-the-alarm-idUSKBN21P1VF (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci/special-report-johnson-listened-to-his-scientists-about-coronavirus-but-they-were-slow-to-sound-the-alarm-idUSKBN21P1VF)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 08, 2020, 03:50:44 AM
A couple of other in-depth articles, including EU's and some of the countries' response time, development and some future aspects

https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-europe-failed-the-test/

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/03/how-will-coronavirus-end/608719/

Of course, a good deal of the current conclusions might be revised later.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 08, 2020, 05:07:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 12:06:11 AMNow, if you claim that Boris Johnson and his policies are directly responsible for the UK situation you should apply the same reasoning to Spain as well and come to the conclusion that Pedro Sanchez and his policies are directly responsible for the Spanish disaster.

My reasoning stems from specific policies and ideologies pushed forward by BoJo and their effect on the pandemic response/NHS capacities, not a simplistic number comparison.

But it's beside the point, as I didn't say zilch about Sanchez's responsibility and he very well might bear the brunt of it – I simply don't know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 05:41:26 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on April 08, 2020, 03:41:26 AM
An article analysing thoroughly the response of the UK scientists and government since the start of the events :

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci/special-report-johnson-listened-to-his-scientists-about-coronavirus-but-they-were-slow-to-sound-the-alarm-idUSKBN21P1VF (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci/special-report-johnson-listened-to-his-scientists-about-coronavirus-but-they-were-slow-to-sound-the-alarm-idUSKBN21P1VF)

Very interesting, thanks for posting it. Mandatory reading for Rinaldo and SimonNz.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 08, 2020, 05:46:23 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 01:24:13 AM
Thank you PD!  :)
Hope you and your family are keeping safe.

I discovered a nice 5 and a half mile country walk from the house which saves having to drive anywhere.

Splendid!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 08, 2020, 05:46:23 AM
Splendid!

Cheers Karl.
My wife can't walk at my slow pace so she is always miles ahead and we communicate by mobile phone.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:54:27 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on April 08, 2020, 03:22:00 AM
That's very handy :). We're driving 8 miles to a deserted bit of countryside that's also near two quiet shops. The walks from our door would be more crowded even though the council have now barricaded the vehicle entrance to one of the largest areas of open land.

We have been driving sometimes too. We are lucky, not only by the proximity of nice countryside, but also because we have a village shops which keeps essential supplies (like loo paper) for regular customers. The govt doesn't want us to drive to exercise but recently, walking on a local footpath, I must have passed about ten walkers and their dogs on a very narrow footpath, whereas if I drive to open land about ten minutes away I can avoid close proximity to anyone else.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 06:57:29 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
My wife can't walk at my slow pace so she is always miles ahead and we communicate by mobile phone.  ::)

Your pace is Langsam, schleppend and hers is Kräftig bewegt.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 08, 2020, 07:08:14 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 08, 2020, 05:07:14 AM
My reasoning stems from specific policies and ideologies pushed forward by BoJo and their effect on the pandemic response/NHS capacities, not a simplistic number comparison.

But it's beside the point, as I didn't say zilch about Sanchez's responsibility and he very well might bear the brunt of it – I simply don't know.

Your reasoning is something to behold. It seems you know little re Sanchez but an expert on Boris Johnson. Your posts raise an incredulous smile, which on this thread is quite an achievement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 07:15:39 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 01:24:13 AM
Thank you PD!  :)
Hope you and your family are keeping safe.

I discovered a nice 5 and a half mile country walk from the house which saves having to drive anywhere.
Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 06:57:29 AM
Your pace is Langsam, schleppend and hers is Kräftig bewegt.  :laugh:
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:54:27 AM
We have been driving sometimes too. We are lucky, not only by the proximity of nice countryside, but also because we have a village shops which keeps essential supplies (like loo paper) for regular customers. The govt doesn't want us to drive to exercise but recently, walking on a local footpath, I must have passed about ten walkers and their dogs on a very narrow footpath, whereas if I drive to open land about ten minutes away I can avoid close proximity to anyone else.
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:54:27 AM
We have been driving sometimes too. We are lucky, not only by the proximity of nice countryside, but also because we have a village shops which keeps essential supplies (like loo paper) for regular customers. The govt doesn't want us to drive to exercise but recently, walking on a local footpath, I must have passed about ten walkers and their dogs on a very narrow footpath, whereas if I drive to open land about ten minutes away I can avoid close proximity to anyone else.
Just back from a moderately long walk (some stopping to look at birds, flowering things and trees)...saw a hawk flying with a branch in its mouth; it was adding to a nest that it (I'm guessing) had built at sometime in the past.  Noticed another one already sitting in the nest.  No idea whether or not one of them had already laid some eggs, but still neat to see.  Too high up to view the occupants well, but still delighted to see the birds.  The walk was partly to get some exercise and destress and partly to help relax muscles in legs and elsewhere which were tight from a lot of yard work yesterday!   ::)

Glad to hear that you two have managed to find some areas which you can walk around in without bumping into a lot of people!  Enjoy!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 08, 2020, 07:33:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
Cheers Karl.
My wife can't walk at my slow pace so she is always miles ahead and we communicate by mobile phone.  ::)

Superfluous "social distancing"?  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on April 08, 2020, 08:45:26 AM
Samuel L Jackson with some important advice with regard to Covid-19


https://www.youtube.com/v/XvB9ftAHpwc


Parental guidance required.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 08:50:50 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 08, 2020, 08:45:26 AM
Samuel L Jackson with some important advice with regard to Covid-19


https://www.youtube.com/v/XvB9ftAHpwc


Parental guidance required.

The "some important advice with regard to Covid-19" part made me laugh out loud much more than the video. Thanks!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 09:04:02 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 06:57:29 AM
Your pace is Langsam, schleppend and hers is Kräftig bewegt.  :laugh:
;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 09:06:51 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 08, 2020, 07:33:04 AM
Superfluous "social distancing"?  8)

The other day she shot off in the wrong direction, got lost and thus ended up behind me  :D
The walk took in a number of World War Two 'pill boxes' which interested me. They were there to guard the railway line to London.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 09:09:02 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 07:15:39 AM
Just back from a moderately long walk (some stopping to look at birds, flowering things and trees)...saw a hawk flying with a branch in its mouth; it was adding to a nest that it (I'm guessing) had built at sometime in the past.  Noticed another one already sitting in the nest.  No idea whether or not one of them had already laid some eggs, but still neat to see.  Too high up to view the occupants well, but still delighted to see the birds.  The walk was partly to get some exercise and destress and partly to help relax muscles in legs and elsewhere which were tight from a lot of yard work yesterday!   ::)

Glad to hear that you two have managed to find some areas which you can walk around in without bumping into a lot of people!  Enjoy!

PD

We live on a flight path to Gatwick Airport but as there are hardly any planes I am much more aware of birdsong and wildlife. I'm glad that you had a nice walk. Very important to get out, as far as one is allowed to, at the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 08, 2020, 09:19:13 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 09:09:02 AM
We live on a flight path to Gatwick Airport but as there are hardly any planes I am much more aware of birdsong and wildlife. I'm glad that you had a nice walk. Very important to get out, as far as one is allowed to, at the moment.

The end of the runway is a lovely peaceful place now.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 08, 2020, 10:16:15 AM

     Coronavirus unlikely to significantly diminish with warm weather, National Academies of Sciences panel finds (https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/04/08/coronavirus-unlikely-diminish-with-warm-weather-national-academies-sciences-panel-finds/)

"Given that countries currently in 'summer' climates, such as Australia and Iran, are experiencing rapid virus spread, a decrease in cases with increases in humidity and temperature elsewhere should not be assumed," the NAS report finds.

It ominously notes that influenza pandemics during the past 250 years started at different times of the year and had second waves about six months after the first, regardless of season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 10:16:56 AM
I believe Spain has now started the long process of easing out of lockdown by allowing non essential workers back to work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on April 08, 2020, 10:23:16 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 12:06:11 AM
because he's a Conservative

Come on, you know better, he isn't, nor anything specifically political at all. Johnson is very ill though.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 08, 2020, 10:45:01 AM

     Coronavirus State-By-State Projections: When Will Each State Peak? (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/04/07/825479416/new-yorks-coronavirus-deaths-may-level-off-soon-when-might-your-state-s-peak)

The model makes some key assumptions about how state leaders will act — and depending on what they do, the picture could change. First, it assumes that all states will continue social distancing through the end of May, which is longer than the White House has asked Americans to practice social distancing. Second, it assumes states that have not already implemented three key social distancing measures — closing schools, closing nonessential businesses and issuing stay-at-home orders — will do so in one week.

This second assumption is particularly important for a state like Massachusetts, which has closed nonessential businesses and schools, but has not ordered residents to stay at home. Republican Gov. Charlie Baker has resisted calls to mandate a stay-at-home order, though he has enacted a voluntary stay-at-home advisory. "I do not believe I can or should order U.S. citizens to keep confined to their homes for days on end," Baker said last month.


     Click on the link for a state and see what the projections are.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 08, 2020, 10:48:55 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 08, 2020, 07:08:14 AMIt seems you know little re Sanchez but an expert on Boris Johnson.

Yes, that's what I've said. One can follow a certain country's politics very closely while not following what's hapenning in some other part of the world.

Quote from: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 05:41:26 AM
Very interesting, thanks for posting it. Mandatory reading for Rinaldo and SimonNz.

Dear Andrei, while I don't want to drag you back into a discussion you've ended, it helps to read beyond the headlines. One example:

Quote from: ReutersWith Brexit done, Johnson had the chance to focus on other matters the following month, among them the emerging virus threat. But leaving the European Union had a consequence.

Between February 13 and March 30, Britain missed a total of eight conference calls or meetings about the coronavirus between EU heads of state or health ministers - meetings that Britain was still entitled to join. Although Britain did later make an arrangement to attend lower-level meetings of officials, it had missed a deadline to participate in a common purchase scheme for ventilators, to which it was invited. Ventilators, vitally important to treating the direst cases of COVID-19, have fallen into short supply globally. Johnson's spokesman blamed an administrative error.

Plus, when I'm alluding to Johnson's politics, it reaches well beyond the past two months, e.g. FactCheck: Is Boris Johnson really giving the NHS "new money"?

Anyway, I hope you're all well and safe. And for the kind user who've messaged me: I wanted to reply but your inbox is full. Just so you know ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 10:50:58 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 08, 2020, 10:48:55 AM
I hope you're all well and safe.

I am, thank you --- the same to you and all your loved ones.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 01:28:59 PM
I just want to post some thoughts about where this thing is going.

Even when a large swathe of the population is immune to the virus in its current form, it's still there. It will not be able to infect people so easily, but it still will be able to infect people.

That would be bad enough if it were like a bad dose of flu, but it isn't -- it has a sting in its tail which is probably lethal to vulnerable people and lethal or very debilitating to many others.

I don't see a way out of this conundrum without good medication or a vaccine. I'm not sure what the rational thing to do is, particularly at the level of individual decisions about whether to go to work, go to concerts, football matches, bars and restaurants, etc. The problem is exacerbated because there is no reliable way to see if you're immune at the moment.

Politically we may have to end up with different rules for two groups -- those who have good antibodies and those who don't. It's frightening.

Add into the equation that the virus can mutate at any time, with unknown consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 08, 2020, 01:43:54 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 01:28:59 PM
I just want to post some thoughts about where this thing is going.

Even when a large swathe of the population is immune to the virus in its current form, it's still there. It will not be able to infect people so easily, but it still will be able to infect people.

That would be bad enough if it were like a bad dose of flu, but it isn't -- it has a sting in its tail which is probably lethal to vulnerable people and lethal or very debilitating to many others.

I don't see a way out of this conundrum without good medication or a vaccine. I'm not sure what the rational thing to do is, particularly at the level of individual decisions about whether to go to work, go to concerts, football matches, bars and restaurants, etc. The problem is exacerbated because there is no reliable way to see if you're immune at the moment.

Politically we may have to end up with different rules for two groups -- those who have good antibodies and those who don't. It's frightening.

Add into the equation that the virus can mutate at any time, with unknown consequences.

I think these are good thoughts, especially the recognition of the uncertainty. I wish more here recognized that they didn't know enough to pronounce the one true answer.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 01:47:13 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 09:06:51 AM
The other day she shot off in the wrong direction, got lost and thus ended up behind me  :D
The walk took in a number of World War Two 'pill boxes' which interested me. They were there to guard the railway line to London.
I had to google what a 'pill box' is.   :-[

Alright, Jeffrey, now is your chance to work on your cardio (presuming that you don't have any big health issues?  Pardon if I'm wrong here).   ;)

Hate to say it but here, I was/am pretty stiff in certain areas after a long day of bending/squatting to weed, rake and pick up 'stuff' in my garden:  must get in fighting shape!   ;) :)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 01:47:13 PM
I had to google what a 'pill box' is.   :-[

Alright, Jeffrey, now is your chance to work on your cardio (presuming that you don't have any big health issues?  Pardon if I'm wrong here).   ;)

Hate to say it but here, I was/am pretty stiff in certain areas after a long day of bending/squatting to weed, rake and pick up 'stuff' in my garden:  must get in fighting shape!   ;) :)

Best wishes,

PD

Good point PD. I tend to go swimming quite a lot but of course the pool is closed down for now. My wife wants me to go cycling with her next week. Oh dear!  ::)
Yes, a pill box might be a uniquely British term, I don't know. They can either be the thing I put my medication in to prevent me accidentally overdosing on it or one of these (this one is familiar to me as it's local):
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 02:24:53 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 08, 2020, 02:15:33 PM
Good point PD. I tend to go swimming quite a lot but of course the pool is closed down for now. My wife wants me to go cycling with her next week. Oh dear!  ::)
Yes, a pill box might be a uniquely British term, I don't know. They can either be the thing I put my medication in to prevent me accidentally overdosing on it or one of these (this one is familiar to me as it's local:


lol  I, do understand the common conception of what a pill box is, but on this side of the puddle, I hadn't heard of the meaning re WWII meant.  By the way, was that the term used then or a more recent ascription?

And, hey, just put a bit of air into your bike tires and go for a short ride (do stretch before and after);  I expect that you will enjoy the freedom.  Give it a shot, you can do it Jeffrey.   :)

Will hit garden again soon here.

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 11:50:36 PM
Coronavirus: low antibody levels raise questions about reinfection risk

https://amp-scmp-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3078840/coronavirus-low-antibody-levels-raise-questions-about?usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D&amp_js_v=0.1#aoh=15864136864555&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scmp.com%2Fnews%2Fchina%2Fscience%2Farticle%2F3078840%2Fcoronavirus-low-antibody-levels-raise-questions-about
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 11:51:17 PM
Coronavirus: Passport Office staff told to go back to work


Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52219930
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 08, 2020, 11:58:23 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 08, 2020, 01:43:54 PM
I think these are good thoughts, especially the recognition of the uncertainty. I wish more here recognized that they didn't know enough to pronounce the one true answer.

+ 1.

And the uncertainty is even more frightening than it appears at first sight. How do we know that right now there's not an even more dangerous virus somewhere in the world, waiting just for the right opportunity to spread and which will make the Covid-19 crisis look like a walk in the park?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 01:25:47 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 08, 2020, 02:24:53 PM
lol  I, do understand the common conception of what a pill box is, but on this side of the puddle, I hadn't heard of the meaning re WWII meant.  By the way, was that the term used then or a more recent ascription?

And, hey, just put a bit of air into your bike tires and go for a short ride (do stretch before and after);  I expect that you will enjoy the freedom.  Give it a shot, you can do it Jeffrey.   :)

Will hit garden again soon here.

All the best,

PD
OT

Thank you PD.
Extensive research has come up with the following item on the WW2 Pill Box which you might find of interest:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillbox_(military)
Actually I didn't realise that the term goes back to WW1.

Under pressure I did buy myself a bike a while back. My last one was stolen when I was about 12 I think. I have now recovered from the traumatic 'Austrian Bike Ride' - a notorious event in my family. On holiday with my wife and daughter, some years ago,  they insisted on a bike ride - so we hired bikes. Of course I was miles behind them. Firstly I took a wrong direction and realised that the increasingly steep road I was on went up a mountain. Then the chain came off the bike but with mobile phone instructions from my daughter I managed to fix it. I eventually arrived at the village where we agreed to meet. There was some marvellous scenery once I found the right cycle path, and I was cycling on a nice flat path in a beautiful valley surrounded by mountain scenery on both sides. I liked to imagine myself as James Coburn on his bike escaping from the Nazis in 'The Great Escape'. At the village I had a nice glass of beer and assumed that we would be returning on the train, but, Oh No! We had to cycle back. We set off and I was just pushing the bike, then my wife shouted at me 'Get on the bike Jeff - Get on the bike Jeff'. So, of course I did, setting off on a narrow path with the river on one side of me and a wall on the other side. I tried to brake but there were no brakes as I had the handle-bars the wrong way round. It was a surreal moment when I thought, with rising panic 'where are the brakes?' According to my daughter I then wobbled precariously between the river and the wall before crashing into the wall and, apparently in slow-motion, toppled off the bike. When I looked back my wife and daughter were rolling around in hysterical laughter. At least I didn't fall into the river!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 01:46:41 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 01:25:47 AM
my wife shouted at me 'Get on the bike Jeff - Get on the bike Jeff'. So, of course I did, setting off on a narrow path with the river on one side of me and a wall on the other side. I tried to brake but there were no brakes as I had the handlebars the wrong way round. It was a surreal moment when I thought, with rising panic 'where are the brakes?'

Are you sure you and Mr. Bean were not separated at birth?  >:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 09, 2020, 02:14:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 01:28:59 PMI just want to post some thoughts about where this thing is going.

Ed Yong's How the Pandemic Will End (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/03/how-will-coronavirus-end/608719/) comes to mind.

Quote from: Ed YongOne could easily conceive of a world in which most of the nation believes that America defeated COVID-19. Despite his many lapses, Trump's approval rating has surged. Imagine that he succeeds in diverting blame for the crisis to China, casting it as the villain and America as the resilient hero. During the second term of his presidency, the U.S. turns further inward and pulls out of NATO and other international alliances, builds actual and figurative walls, and disinvests in other nations. As Gen C grows up, foreign plagues replace communists and terrorists as the new generational threat.

One could also envisage a future in which America learns a different lesson. A communal spirit, ironically born through social distancing, causes people to turn outward, to neighbors both foreign and domestic. The election of November 2020 becomes a repudiation of "America first" politics. The nation pivots, as it did after World War II, from isolationism to international cooperation. Buoyed by steady investments and an influx of the brightest minds, the health-care workforce surges. Gen C kids write school essays about growing up to be epidemiologists. Public health becomes the centerpiece of foreign policy. The U.S. leads a new global partnership focused on solving challenges like pandemics and climate change.

In 2030, SARS-CoV-3 emerges from nowhere, and is brought to heel within a month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 09, 2020, 02:41:53 AM
I'm aware this is slightly off topic, but this crisis has shown a strong acceleration of the decline of the influence of the United States on the world stage.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 02:49:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 01:25:47 AM
OT

Thank you PD.
Extensive research has come up with the following item on the WW2 Pill Box which you might find of interest:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillbox_(military)
Actually I didn't realise that the term goes back to WW1.

Under pressure I did buy myself a bike a while back. My last one was stolen when I was about 12 I think. I have now recovered from the traumatic 'Austrian Bike Ride' - a notorious event in my family. On holiday with my wife and daughter, some years ago,  they insisted on a bike ride - so we hired bikes. Of course I was miles behind them. Firstly I took a wrong direction and realised that the increasingly steep road I was on went up a mountain. Then the chain came off the bike but with mobile phone instructions from my daughter I managed to fix it. I eventually arrived at the village where we agreed to meet. There was some marvellous scenery once I found the right cycle path, and I was cycling on a nice flat path in a beautiful valley surrounded by mountain scenery on both sides. I liked to imagine myself as James Coburn on his bike escaping from the Nazis in 'The Great Escape'. At the village I had a nice glass of beer and assumed that we would be returning on the train, but, Oh No! We had to cycle back. We set off and I was just pushing the bike, then my wife shouted at me 'Get on the bike Jeff - Get on the bike Jeff'. So, of course I did, setting off on a narrow path with the river on one side of me and a wall on the other side. I tried to brake but there were no brakes as I had the handlebars the wrong way round. It was a surreal moment when I thought, with rising panic 'where are the brakes?' According to my daughter I then wobbled precariously between the river and the wall before crashing into the wall and, apparently in slow-motion, toppled off the bike. When I looked back my wife and daughter were rolling around in hysterical laughter. At least I didn't fall into the river!
Augh!   ???  I trust that it was just (mostly) your dignity that was bruised?  Poor Jeffrey!  Well, you lived to tell the tale!  O.k., so now you have plenty of time now I trust to get 'back on the horse'--so to speak?  But seriously, I know a couple of people who having other health issues, find that bike riding is a good exercise for them.  I need to put air in my tires myself and get back to it...rather cold and rainy though today.  We all have our issues; I'm recovering from overdoing it in my yard/garden recently (really tight muscles), so you're not alone!

Thanks for that link to pill boxes; I'll read it over coffee in a bit.   :)

Best wishes,

PD

p.s.  A relative of mine purchased an inexpensive electric-assist bicycle a few years ago.  You still have to pedal, but it does help.  Perhaps that's a thought?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 03:01:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 02:49:30 AM
A relative of mine purchased an inexpensive electric-assist bicycle a few years ago.  You still have to pedal, but it does help.  Perhaps that's a thought?

More useful for him would be an electric-assist brake with a big red button reading "PRESS TO BRAKE".  ;D  :-* >:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 03:37:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 01:46:41 AM
Are you sure you and Mr. Bean were not separated at birth?  >:D
;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 04:02:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 03:01:01 AM
More useful for him would be an electric-assist brake with a big red button reading "PRESS TO BRAKE".  ;D  :-* >:D
I expect most of us would be a bit nervous being on a narrow path like that to begin with.   ;)

Still, I'm trying to figure out how he could be riding the bike with the front wheel flipped the wrong way around (or am I misunderstanding?)?  :-\

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 04:11:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 04:02:38 AM
I'm trying to figure out how he could be riding the bike with the front wheel flipped the wrong way around (or am I misunderstanding?)?  :-\

This is what I asked myself when reading his post, but I'm sure that if somebody can do that it must be Jeffrey.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 09, 2020, 04:13:01 AM
Saudi Arabia begins two-week ceasefire in Yemen due to coronavirus (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/saudi-arabia-begins-two-week-ceasefire-in-yemen-due-to-coronavirus)

"Saudi Arabia has started a two-week unilateral ceasefire in Yemen, in a move designed to show its awareness of the threat the coronavirus poses to a war-torn country with only rudimentary health services.

So far no Covid-19 cases have been reported in the country. However, Saudi Arabia, with which Yemen shares a border, has suffered more than 40 deaths and is projecting many more. Yemen has closed its borders.

The Saudi move has been welcomed by aid agencies and the UN special envoy, Martin Griffiths. A key test now will be whether it can be sustained, unlike a previous ceasefire a fortnight ago that collapsed within days.

Fighting has been especially intense in the Al Jawf governorate in the north, where the Yemen government, backed by Saudi Arabia, has been trying to reverse recent Houthi gains. The Houthis were still firing ballistic missiles in the Marib in Wednesday after the Saudis announced the ceasefire and, as with many ceasefires, will be wary of letting Saudi Arabia use the ceasefire to regroup."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 04:14:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 04:11:07 AM
This is what I asked myself when reading his post, but I'm sure that if somebody can do that it must be Jeffrey.  :laugh:
:laugh: That said, I do have my backward ways of doing things at times; some....times works, but often.... :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2020, 04:53:46 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 01:28:59 PM
I just want to post some thoughts about where this thing is going.

Even when a large swathe of the population is immune to the virus in its current form, it's still there. It will not be able to infect people so easily, but it still will be able to infect people.

That would be bad enough if it were like a bad dose of flu, but it isn't -- it has a sting in its tail which is probably lethal to vulnerable people and lethal or very debilitating to many others.

I don't see a way out of this conundrum without good medication or a vaccine. I'm not sure what the rational thing to do is, particularly at the level of individual decisions (...)

There's a lot of work regarding possible medicine going on. In my little country, 5 possible types have now already been officially acknowledged for testing. The newspaper article describing them mentions 11 examples of maybe relevant medicine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 05:02:37 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 04:02:38 AM
I expect most of us would be a bit nervous being on a narrow path like that to begin with.   ;)

Still, I'm trying to figure out how he could be riding the bike with the front wheel flipped the wrong way around (or am I misunderstanding?)?  :-\

Best,

PD

The handle-bars can turn completely around, so, believe me, it's quite possible to do it (for me anyway). No, my dignity was bruised but I was otherwise unscathed thank you. The story, known in the family as 'The Austrian Bike Ride' has provided hours of entertainment especially for my daughter who likes to tell everyone about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 05:05:43 AM
Back on topic I was very impressed by this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-52227222/coronavirus-bbc-presenter-emily-maitlis-criticises-misleading-language

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/emily-maitlis-praised-as-she-slams-language-used-amid-coronavirus-crisis-in-extraordinary-newsnight-a4410761.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 05:50:19 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 05:02:37 AM
The handle-bars can turn completely around, so, believe me, it's quite possible to do it (for me anyway). No, my dignity was bruised but I was otherwise unscathed thank you. The story, known in the family as 'The Austrian Bike Ride' has provided hours of entertainment especially for my daughter who likes to tell everyone about it.
Loose handlebars on a cheap rental?  Or some design that I don't know about?  I haven't rented a bike in a gazillion years so don't know what's out there.  In any event, you're alive and have a tale of your own to tell!  So, there!  :)

Saw a really nice story on the news this morning:  people have come up with a way to lend their RVs to medical persons who need them.  Doctors, nurses, etc., who are concerned about spreading the illness to their family are being lent RVs to them by kind people.  This way they can stay sequestered but close to/see/interact from afar with their families and loved ones (like parking them in their driveways).  Keeps everyone safe and helps with lowering stress.   8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 06:28:32 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 05:05:43 AM
Back on topic I was very impressed by this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-52227222/coronavirus-bbc-presenter-emily-maitlis-criticises-misleading-language

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/emily-maitlis-praised-as-she-slams-language-used-amid-coronavirus-crisis-in-extraordinary-newsnight-a4410761.html
Good story and important thoughts about who is effected and how we should discuss the issues.  A number of stories on NPR about how black people are being disproportionally effected in the States and why.  Here's one of them:  https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/04/02/825730141/the-coronavirus-doesnt-discriminate-but-u-s-health-care-showing-familiar-biases

And another:  https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/04/08/830030932/cdc-hospital-data-point-to-racial-disparity-in-covid-19-cases

And small-town hospitals were already struggling with some having to close before this all began.  https://www.npr.org/2020/04/09/829753752/small-town-hospitals-are-closing-just-as-coronavirus-arrives-in-rural-america
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 09, 2020, 06:35:48 AM
Quote from: Que on April 09, 2020, 02:41:53 AM
I'm aware this is slightly off topic, but this crisis has shown a strong acceleration of the decline of the influence of the United States on the world stage.

Q

     That's certainly true. It's turned out to be a bad idea, as international cooperation has declined with it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 09, 2020, 06:49:37 AM
From one of the articles linked above
QuoteThe new Corona virus doesn't discriminate

This assumes a fact very much not in evidence, and foolish to assume. One thing we know is that ACE proteins are involved in the virus's ability to get into cells, and there are racial differences around ACE. We simply do not know if this matters. I wish people would stop asserting things they cannot know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 07:13:11 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 09, 2020, 06:49:37 AM
From one of the articles linked above
This assumes a fact very much not in evidence, and foolish to assume. One thing we know is that ACE proteins are involved in the virus's ability to get into cells, and there are racial differences around ACE. We simply do not know if this matters. I wish people would stop asserting things they cannot know.
You might wish to listen to this:  https://www.npr.org/2020/04/08/829544245/morning-news-brief  There was a longer interview also NPR which I am trying to find broadcast sometime over the past few days which I think you would appreciate.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 09, 2020, 07:38:54 AM
EU science chief resigns in stinging criticism of EU response of Coronavirus response.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2020/04/08/extremely-disappointed-eu-science-chief-resigns-in-stinging-criticism-of-coronavirus-response/#1077363a57c4
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 07:42:35 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 09, 2020, 07:38:54 AM
EU science chief resigns in stinging criticism of EU response of Coronavirus response.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2020/04/08/extremely-disappointed-eu-science-chief-resigns-in-stinging-criticism-of-coronavirus-response/#1077363a57c4

EU is dead. Covid-19 killed it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on April 09, 2020, 07:46:44 AM
But it had long suffered from pre-existing conditions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 07:51:14 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on April 09, 2020, 07:46:44 AM
But it had long suffered from pre-existing conditions.

Excellent one! Really excellent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 09, 2020, 07:57:23 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 07:13:11 AM
You might wish to listen to this:  https://www.npr.org/2020/04/08/829544245/morning-news-brief  There was a longer interview also NPR which I am trying to find broadcast sometime over the past few days which I think you would appreciate.

Interesting. I didn't listen but looked through the transcript and it seems they are very careful to say we don't yet if there is a racial disparity in susceptibility. Isn't that what I said? In contradiction of the blithe assertion in the other NPR piece that there was none.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2020, 08:41:57 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 09, 2020, 07:57:23 AM
Interesting. I didn't listen but looked through the transcript and it seems they are very careful to say we don't yet if there is a racial disparity in susceptibility. Isn't that what I said? In contradiction of the blithe assertion in the other NPR piece that there was none.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?  One of the main things that I took out of these articles and other things including that other interview which aired (I want to say within the past fews days) is that there are serious problems in our society in terms of equal access to decent healthcare and that it needs to be fixed.  (from one link):

'Dr. Georges Benjamin of the American Public Health Association has been pushing health officials to start monitoring race and income in the response to COVID-19.

"We want people to collect the data in an organized, professional, scientific manner and show who's getting it and who's not getting it," Benjamin says. "Recognize that we very well may see these health inequities."

The subjectivity of symptoms

Until he's convinced otherwise, Benjamin says he assumes the usual disparities are at play.

"Experience has taught all of us that if you're poor, if you're of color, you're going to get services second," he says.'

And from another of my links:

'KING: All right. So you're saying we don't have all of the numbers, but the numbers that we do have are pretty troubling. Why would one racial group be more affected by COVID-19?

GREENFIELDBOYCE: So the members of the Coronavirus Task Force say it probably comes down to medical conditions that disproportionately affect African Americans. We know that there are medical conditions that lead to bad outcomes when people get this virus. Here's how Anthony Fauci put it last night.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

ANTHONY FAUCI: When they do get infected, their underlying medical conditions - the diabetes, the hypertension, the asthma - those are the kind of things that wind them up in the ICU and ultimately give them a higher death rate.

GREENFIELDBOYCE: Studies have shown that there are real, unfair differences related to health in this country. I mean, people of color are less likely to have access to quality health care when they get sick. They're less likely to get routine preventive care. And there is a lot of social and economic things that go into that. Dr. Fauci said it kind of reminded him a bit of HIV, which he spent his career working on. It hit the gay community and brought attention to discrimination against gay people. He said coronavirus is shining a light on the inequality in health right now for African Americans.'

You might also read this:  https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/factors-contributing-higher-incidence-diabetes-black-americans

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 09, 2020, 09:44:43 AM
PD
I am addressing only one point. It is this statement, which is my re wording of "the virus doesn't discriminate ":

"There is no heightened risk factor for any race. The higher death rate is attributable to other, known factors. Healthy affluent blacks are absolutely at no higher risk."

But we don't know that. There are drugs and diseases for which race is a risk factor, even when other factors are controlled for. It might be the case for Corona, and I have seen doctors argue that it is plausible because of racial differences iN ACE. And if race really is a risk factor we shouldn't tell people who are at a higher risk that they aren't. But npr blithely did.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 09, 2020, 11:08:36 AM
Easter bunnies 2020 style

(https://imagevars.gulfnews.com/2020/04/09/Chocolate-Easter-Bunnies-with-a-protective-mask-and-a-roll-of-toilet-paper-are-seen-at-a-chocolate-factory-in-Pirmasens--Germany--April-9--2020--as-the-spread-of-the-coronavirus-disease--COVID-19--continues.-REUTERS-Ralph-Orlowski_1715e9a300e_medium.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 09, 2020, 12:52:37 PM

     Boris Johnson is out of intensive care while still in the hospital receiving treatment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 09, 2020, 02:00:29 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 09, 2020, 11:08:36 AM
Easter bunnies 2020 style

(https://imagevars.gulfnews.com/2020/04/09/Chocolate-Easter-Bunnies-with-a-protective-mask-and-a-roll-of-toilet-paper-are-seen-at-a-chocolate-factory-in-Pirmasens--Germany--April-9--2020--as-the-spread-of-the-coronavirus-disease--COVID-19--continues.-REUTERS-Ralph-Orlowski_1715e9a300e_medium.jpg)

Nice. Borrowing this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 09, 2020, 07:18:09 PM
I'm not paranoid, but vigilant like everyone else, so  i spurt a mask plus a scarf it's bullet proof whit Lysol or 100% alcohol.

I take huge bath like extremely hot water, not boiling and sea salt ocean big salt it kill microbes were ever they are good for skin too...

This and I Purel when I venture and inside when i come back wash my hands 7-8 time a days.

I disinfected everything door nobs too  bathroom to walls, my keyboard, everywhere I use  Hertel and etc even my  mail box, especially my mailbox outside, even my recycling box is clean...

Extreme precaution means extreme cautions prudence is required in these days of age.

Don't forget to clean your house regullary if you can, not only wash your hand's and etc, eat oranges a lot, dark green wedgies and eggplant, boycott restaurant for a while , cook if you don't learn, I'm a good cook ,lucky about it, learned whit trial and errors. And that it stay healthy ,clean your house best you can too, my two cents.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

To recap, I accepted a new job two months ago, sold the house, planned my move, then the pandemic hit. By some miracle, the house closing went through, the movers came on April 3rd, and we left that evening to drive from Central Coast California to the Houston Texas area. We stopped the first night in Pasadena, lunched the next morning in Palm Springs, CA, slept the next night in Phoenix AZ. The next day we lunched in Tucson AZ, had diner in Les Cruces NM, and slept in El Paso Texas. Got up, had lunch in Van Horn Texas, dinner in Odessa Texas and slept in Abilene Texas. The last day we lunched in Dallas Texas and arrived in Spring Texas.

Things were surprisingly normal, with a few odd touches. We had to talk to hotel clerks through the night check-in window, or from behind a plexiglass barrier. But everything was functioning more or less normally. Probably there was less traffic in the metropolitan areas we passed. We did check into all of those motels, and probably that is the biggest risk of exposure we have faced. We stopped in a Whole Foods Market in each major city we passed to get lunch and/or supplies for subsequent dinner, which we prepared in our hotel room with a hot plate and toaster oven we brought with us in the car. Some nights we stopped in two hotels, one to prepare our dinner and another to actually sleep. It added up to about 1,700 miles, 3,000 kilometers, and about 28 hours of actual driving.

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 09, 2020, 11:03:59 PM
Wishing you well, in Texas.
I couldn't help but notice that Spring's Wiki all but says "we're a very white town, very good".
You can't help that.
Good luck in your new job.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 11:26:57 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...

Warm wishes and best of luck with your new circumstances. Stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2020, 11:33:28 PM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 11:26:57 PM
Warm wishes and best of luck with your new circumstances. Stay safe!

From me too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 09, 2020, 11:54:20 PM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2020, 07:42:35 AM
EU is dead. Covid-19 killed it.

That is what I think but didn't have the nerve to say it.  :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2020, 11:58:32 PM
"EU finance ministers agree on €500 billion emergency fund"

https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/09/coronavirus-eurogroup-finance-ministers-agree-on-500-billion-emergency-fund
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 10, 2020, 12:00:28 AM
So it seems the EU is still in the ICU, then...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 12:12:21 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 10, 2020, 12:00:28 AM
So it seems the EU is still in the ICU, then...

Given its grave pre-existing conditions, I'm afraid that the ventilator came too late.

Seriously now, it's not just a problem of money and economy. This crisis has clearly shown that the "European solidarity" is a fiction, that there are no "common values". In the past two months we've seen Italy, Spain and France fighting a desperate fight --- alone and on their own. We've seen no EU at all. And when they pleaded for help, Germany, Austria, The Netherlands and Finland were reluctant, to put it mildly. The divide between North and South, between two completely different, if not utterly opposed, philosophies of life and ways of life has never been more sharp and clear.

EU is dead, even if its decaying corpse will still roam around for a while.

It pains me to say it but it's obvious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 10, 2020, 12:26:06 AM
It's a bit more complex than that, I'm afraid, Andrei. Can't talk about Italy, but here in Spain parts of the government (and you know who I mean) are using this horrible situation to promote an extreme social agenda which, in these circumstances, appears "just" and "humane", but will have nefarious consequences whatever down the road. For instance, the introduction of a "minimum living income". Some EU countries can rightfully claim that they will not finance or subsidise financial measures that they don't offer to their own population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 12:46:38 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 10, 2020, 12:26:06 AM
It's a bit more complex than that, I'm afraid, Andrei. Can't talk about Italy, but here in Spain parts of the government (and you know who I mean) are using this horrible situation to promote an extreme social agenda which, in these circumstances, appears "just" and "humane", but will have nefarious consequences whatever down the road. For instance, the introduction of a "minimum living income". Some EU countries can rightfully claim that they will not finance or subsidise financial measures that they don't offer to their own population.

That's correct but it only proves my point. Behind the "solidarity" and "common values" verbiage lies the reality: some EU countries' policies are utterly incompatible with other EU countries' ones, and the differences are based not only on money and economics but on different conceptions of life and of society. Germany is certainly right in denying Pedro Iglesias (who I guess is the de facto leader of the Spanish government, Sanchez being just a good-looking, tenor-voiced, popularity-seeking puppet) his fantasies, but as long as the elections in Spain will favor the PSOE-Podemos-Catalan separatist coalition the tension and conflict will persist. In Italy, euroscepticism has been on the rise even before the Covid-19 crisis; one can safely predict it will continue to gain momentum, and who could condemn them when we see that EU has been conspicuously absent in helping Italy? Hungary and Poland are already seen (unjustly, if you ask me) as the betes noires of the EU. No, really, there are too many divides, tensions and differences which this crisis will only deepen --- and a house divided cannot stand.

I would very much like to be wrong but I'm afraid I am not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 12:12:21 AM
...In the past two months we've seen Italy, Spain and France fighting a desperate fight --- alone and on their own. We've seen no EU at all. And when they pleaded for help, Germany, Austria, The Netherlands and Finland were reluctant, to put it mildly....

This is not true, at least regarding the help Italy got from Germany. And the EU played an important role in it, particularly in the part regarding the masks and other medical equipments.
https://www.corriere.it/esteri/20_marzo_24/coronavirus-svolta-solidale-germania-8-malati-italiani-ricoverati-sassonia-7cd0a51a-6dbc-11ea-9b88-27b94f5268fe.shtml


Quote from: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 12:12:21 AM
EU is dead, even if its decaying corpse will still roam around for a while.

It pains me to say it but it's obvious.

Don't agree at all, and the € 1,000 billions (not 500 billion) agreement signed yesterday is the one of the main evidences of this.
Surely the EU is still far from being perfect, but is there. Or don't you remember how was Europe less than a century ago?
I'm worried by people like you or the other eurosceptics, they all have a very limited vision, in perspective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 10, 2020, 01:26:02 AM
Good to see the angle from Italy, Gio. Thanks! And it's reassuring to see this pro-EU stance (which I personally share).

Florestan does have a point regarding the diversity and contradictions within the EU, of course, and this is difficult to address. IMHO, what's going on in Hungary and Poland could even warrant the expulsion of those countries from the Union, but then again the EU cannot betray the citizens of those countries, and strip them of the benefits of membership, because of the authoritarian bias of their governments.

Coming back to Spain, I do not sense any rising EU sentiment in the population (well, of course these days there's not much chance to discuss these things at ease with colleagues or friends). What I do see is some politicians and journalists raising demands to the Union that they know cannot and will not be fulfilled, as if it's only the a South that is suffering, and not the whole block (or the world, for that matter).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 01:29:57 AM
Quote from: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 01:12:24 AM
(...)


Don't agree at all, and the € 1,000 billions (not 500 billion) agreement signed yesterday is the one of the main evidences of this.
Surely the EU is still far from being perfect, but is there. Or don't you remember how was Europe less than a century ago?
I'm worried by people like you or the other eurosceptics, they all have a very limited vision, in perspective.

Do you have an updated source for the 1,000 billion Euros?

Btw, Denmark sent ventilation machines, a field hospital and a 1 million Euro donation recently to Italy, one week after being asked officially.
The scale of this specific aid can obviously be debated, but there has been some aid, supplementing aid coming from many other countries (including Somalia ...), and while fighting the virus up here as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 01:35:25 AM
Quote from: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 01:12:24 AM
This is not true, at least regarding the help Italy got from Germany. And the EU played an important role in it, particularly in the part regarding the masks and other medical equipments.
https://www.corriere.it/esteri/20_marzo_24/coronavirus-svolta-solidale-germania-8-malati-italiani-ricoverati-sassonia-7cd0a51a-6dbc-11ea-9b88-27b94f5268fe.shtml

8 (eight!) Italian patients treated in a German hospital. Eight! Some moving solidarity and great help, indeed! I wonder on what criteria they were selected.

Quote
Don't agree at all, and the € 1,000 billions (not 500 billion) agreement signed yesterday is the one of the main evidences of this.

Let's see how well it works eventually. Fingers crossed, honestly.

Quote
Surely the EU is still far from being perfect, but is there. Or don't you remember how was Europe less than a century ago?
I'm worried by people like you or the other eurosceptics, they all have a very limited vision, in perspective.

The historical perspective is right. The problem is with the future.

Look, I'm not eurosceptic at all. I would very much like the EU to perdure and run smoothly. It's just that I can't help noticing it doesn't; I can't help noticing deep divides and fracture lines which tend to deepen; and I can't help noticing that nothing lasts for ever.

If EU gets strengthened out of this crisis, so much the better, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 01:48:09 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 10, 2020, 01:26:02 AM
Good to see the angle from Italy, Gio. Thanks! And it's reassuring to see this pro-EU stance (which I personally share).

Rest assured that I am just as pro-EU as you are. I just can't share your optimism, that's all.

QuoteIMHO, what's going on in Hungary and Poland could even warrant the expulsion of those countries from the Union

I beg to differ but this is not the right place to discuss this issue.

QuoteWhat I do see is some politicians and journalists raising demands to the Union that they know cannot and will not be fulfilled, as if it's only the a South that is suffering, and not the whole Blick (or the world, for that matter).

That's true but those politicians and journalists would not do what they do if they knew there was no popular support at all for their ideas. That's my point: how many Spaniards see government and economy is at odds with how many Germans see them. It's not even Iglesias vs. Merkel: it's Spanish voters vs. German voters. The former gave the majority to the leftists, the latter gave it to the christian-democrats. Good luck with reconciling them in a "more perfect union".  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 01:53:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 01:35:25 AM
8 (eight!) Italian patients treated in a German hospital. Eight! Some moving solidarity and great help, indeed! I wonder on what criteria they were selected.
...


I don't where you got that from, but on April 6th, it was at least 44

https://www.deutschland.de/en/news/coronavirus-in-germany-informations

("Germany has admitted 198 seriously ill patients from other EU countries for treatment since the outbreak of the corona pandemic. Currently there are still commitments for 58 treatment places that have not been taken up, a spokesperson for the Foreign Office said in Berlin on Monday. He said that 130 patients from France, 44 patients from Italy and 24 more from the Netherlands had been brought to Germany. ... From the Italian side, it is currently the case that a slight decrease in the number of corona intensive care patients can be observed. Therefore, no further transfer from Italy to Germany is planned for the time being," said the spokesperson. He added that the German states were prepared to provide further assistance")

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 02:07:04 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 01:53:42 AM
I don't where you got that from,

From the link that Gio provided above, a Corriere della Sera article.

Quote
but on April 6th, it was at least 44

https://www.deutschland.de/en/news/coronavirus-in-germany-informations

("Germany has admitted 198 seriously ill patients from other EU countries for treatment since the outbreak of the corona pandemic. Currently there are still commitments for 58 treatment places that have not been taken up, a spokesperson for the Foreign Office said in Berlin on Monday. He said that 130 patients from France, 44 patients from Italy and 24 more from the Netherlands had been brought to Germany. ... From the Italian side, it is currently the case that a slight decrease in the number of corona intensive care patients can be observed. Therefore, no further transfer from Italy to Germany is planned for the time being," said the spokesperson. He added that the German states were prepared to provide further assistance")

44 is still too little. For God's sake, the Italian healthcare system is on the brink of collapse and the Germans boast about receiving 44 patients? Come on!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 02:21:24 AM
And it's not about Germany only. When it became obvious that Italy is facing a tragedy, offers should have immediately come from other EU countries with excellent healthcare systems to take in Italian patients: Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, Finland, Austria. That would have indeed been genuine solidarity. Has anybody seen it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 10, 2020, 03:20:20 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 02:21:24 AM
And it's not about Germany only. When it became obvious that Italy is facing a tragedy, offers should have immediately come from other EU countries with excellent healthcare systems to take in Italian patients: Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, Finland, Austria. That would have indeed been genuine solidarity. Has anybody seen it?

You could argue they were bracing for the time coronavirus arrives at their borders, but I agree the EU should've acted together & more swiftly.

One can also argue this kind of stress test is unprecedented (although the warnings were there: Coronavirus is the greatest global science policy failure in a generation (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/09/deadly-virus-britain-failed-prepare-mers-sars-ebola-coronavirus)) and the EU has woken up from its slumber.

To quote another Guardian piece (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/01/coronavirus-could-be-final-straw-for-eu-european-experts-warn):

QuoteEurope has moved on from an initial me-first response, where some countries imposed export bans on vital medical kit, or put up border controls that left other European citizens stranded. Germany, Austria and Luxembourg have opened their hospitals to treat patients from the hardest-hit countries. France and Germany have donated more masks to Italy than China, according to the EU executive, which trumpeted the statistics on social media amid alarm it was losing the "the global battle of narratives" over "the politics of generosity". In the early phase of the crisis, Russia and China sent medical supplies to Italy, while its nearest neighbours failed to immediately respond to Rome's calls for help.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 10, 2020, 05:14:06 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

To recap, I accepted a new job two months ago, sold the house, planned my move, then the pandemic hit. By some miracle, the house closing went through, the movers came on April 3rd, and we left that evening to drive from Central Coast California to the Houston Texas area. We stopped the first night in Pasadena, lunched the next morning in Palm Springs, CA, slept the next night in Phoenix AZ. The next day we lunched in Tucson AZ, had diner in Les Cruces NM, and slept in El Paso Texas. Got up, had lunch in Van Horn Texas, lunch in Odessa Texas and slept in Abilene Texas. The last day we lunched in Dallas Texas and arrived in Spring Texas.

Things were surprisingly normal, with a few odd touches. We had to talk to hotel clerks through the night check-in window, or from behind a plexiglass barrier. But everything was functioning more or less normally. Probably there was less traffic in the metropolitan areas we passed. We did check into all of those motels, and probably that is the biggest risk of exposure we have faced. We stopped in a Whole Foods Market in each major city we passed to get lunch and/or supplies for subsequent dinner, which we prepared in our hotel room with a hot plate and toaster oven we brought with us in the car. Some nights we stopped in two hotels, one to prepare our dinner and another to actually sleep. It added up to about 1,700 miles, 3,000 kilometers, and about 28 hours of actual driving.

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...

That was a seriously long drive, I'm glad to hear you made it. I was thinking you'd be sleeping in the vehicle too, unless you took a tent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 05:28:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 02:21:24 AM
And it's not about Germany only. When it became obvious that Italy is facing a tragedy, offers should have immediately come from other EU countries with excellent healthcare systems to take in Italian patients: Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, Finland, Austria. That would have indeed been genuine solidarity. Has anybody seen it?

Sweden is running their controversial 'herd policy', and combined with the only few, official lock-down initiatives, the result has been a much, much higher death rate, compared to its neighbouring countries.

It's been predicted that they will run short of ICUs soon, but this has yet to be seen in reality.

Regulatives have also turned up in the Swedish press, that people older than 80 years, or very ill above 60 years of age (these age estimates being biological, rather than calendary) should be refused access to the limited number of available ICUs, in case the pressure should become too hard to handle.

Overall however, the Swedish press' modest level of criticism of the herd policy and its effects has been disappointing, IMO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 05:32:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 01:29:57 AM
Do you have an updated source for the 1,000 billion Euros?

I have an offline source which is the paper I usually read at home (https://www.repubblica.it) , but I could not find that article online.
Something similar is here:
https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2020/04/09/eurogruppo-trovato-accordo-sulle-conclusioni-da-presentare-ai-leader-gualtieri-messi-sul-tavolo-i-bond-europei-tolte-dal-tavolo-le-condizionalita-del-mes-gentiloni-misure-senza-precedenti/5765528/
To be short, to the initial € 500 billions from the ESM it should be added € 500 billions from the Recovery Fund proposed by France, and accepted (in principle) by everybody. So actually the latter hasn't been signed yet (sorry for being inaccurate) but it surely is another step forward.

Quote from: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 01:29:57 AM
Btw, Denmark sent ventilation machines, a field hospital and a 1 million Euro donation recently to Italy, one week after being asked officially.

I didn't know that. Thanks a lot in the name of my country. Another good example of solidarity between European countries, far less advertized than those by China or Russia...(wonder why?  >:D)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 10, 2020, 05:33:35 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 09, 2020, 11:03:59 PM
Wishing you well, in Texas.

+1 That sounds like quite an odyssey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 05:36:58 AM
Quote from: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 05:32:16 AM
I have an offline source which is the paper I usually read at home (https://www.repubblica.it) , but I could not find that article online.
Something similar is here:
https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2020/04/09/eurogruppo-trovato-accordo-sulle-conclusioni-da-presentare-ai-leader-gualtieri-messi-sul-tavolo-i-bond-europei-tolte-dal-tavolo-le-condizionalita-del-mes-gentiloni-misure-senza-precedenti/5765528/
To be short, to the initial € 500 billions from the ESM it should be added € 500 billions from the Recovery Fund proposed by France, and accepted (in principle) by everybody. So actually the latter hasn't been signed yet (sorry for being inaccurate) but it surely is another step forward.

I didn't know that. Thanks a lot in the name of my country. Another good example of solidarity between European countries, far less advertized than those by China or Russia...(wonder why?  >:D)

Thanks, I know 'La Repubblica', when once working in a tourist/newspaper kiosk in downtown Copenhagen, I'd try browsing it regularly, together with 'Corriere ...', it's a serious newspaper (btw, we also had '24 Ore ..." and "Gazetta dello Sport").
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 10, 2020, 07:17:51 AM

    The failure of the economic plan for the EU is what gives energy to the forces now tearing it apart. This was predicted as far back as the '90s.

    People don't just wake up one day and discover that they were really hypernationalists all along. With no national currency, weaker countries are victims of austerity policies of the strongest countries. A little more than a decade ago what had been predicted happened. People reacted the way they do, rebelling against the Austerions.

     An economic crisis changes how people think. People don't just start thinking differently.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 10, 2020, 07:28:32 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 09, 2020, 11:03:59 PM
Wishing you well, in Texas.
I couldn't help but notice that Spring's Wiki all but says "we're a very white town, very good".
You can't help that.
Good luck in your new job.

I don't know what you are reading, but Spring, which is a postal zone within The Woodlands, is part of the Houston metro area, which is often described as the most diverse city in the U.S. In initial walks in my neighborhood I see a diversity of ethnic backgrounds and hear languages other than English spoken.

Thanks for your good wishes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 07:29:54 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 05:36:58 AM
Thanks, I know 'La Repubblica', when once working in a tourist/newspaper kiosk in downtown Copenhagen, I'd try browsing it regularly, together with 'Corriere ...', it's a serious newspaper (btw, we also had '24 Ore ..." and "Gazetta dello Sport").

Well, the most serious is, no doubt, Gazzetta dello Sport  :D. It is the most popular, anyway  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 10, 2020, 07:32:03 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

[...]

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...

Quite the adventure!  Good to hear that all went well. :)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 10, 2020, 07:32:31 AM
Quote from: GioCar on April 10, 2020, 07:29:54 AM
Well, the most serious is, no doubt, Gazzetta dello Sport  :D. (...)

Of course, also illustrated by its colour 😄
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 10, 2020, 07:36:22 AM
The latest batch of the Government's PPE has finally arrived at hospitals throughout London.

(https://i.ibb.co/qRtMyk0/PPE.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 10, 2020, 08:02:47 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.

That sounds pretty extreme. There is a point of diminishing returns. On the other hand, this could be regarded as them moral equivalent of war. What would happen if you refused to close your shades under London blackout during WWII?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 10, 2020, 08:06:29 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

Good to hear. I wish you and your family my best in your new location.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on April 10, 2020, 08:14:18 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.

OK, that's a bit nuts... if I'm already at the supermarket, does it really increase the chance of infection if I throw some Doritos into the cart?  Seriously...  ???


And besides, perhaps the poor guy's wife is expecting, in which case God knows what may be essential...  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 10, 2020, 08:24:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.

Yes, that's crazy.  my impression of the UK police started low: they charge 3000 people a year for Facebook posts and cover up massive grooming scandals.

Anyway, they are not the only ones
https://pjmedia.com/trending/co-police-deeply-sorry-for-arresting-father-for-playing-ball-with-his-daughter/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 10, 2020, 08:33:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 10, 2020, 07:36:22 AM
The latest batch of the Government's PPE has finally arrived at hospitals throughout London.

(https://i.ibb.co/qRtMyk0/PPE.jpg)

Or maybe...

(https://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/Dune-languages.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 10, 2020, 08:34:38 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

To recap, I accepted a new job two months ago, sold the house, planned my move, then the pandemic hit. By some miracle, the house closing went through, the movers came on April 3rd, and we left that evening to drive from Central Coast California to the Houston Texas area. We stopped the first night in Pasadena, lunched the next morning in Palm Springs, CA, slept the next night in Phoenix AZ. The next day we lunched in Tucson AZ, had diner in Les Cruces NM, and slept in El Paso Texas. Got up, had lunch in Van Horn Texas, lunch in Odessa Texas and slept in Abilene Texas. The last day we lunched in Dallas Texas and arrived in Spring Texas.

Things were surprisingly normal, with a few odd touches. We had to talk to hotel clerks through the night check-in window, or from behind a plexiglass barrier. But everything was functioning more or less normally. Probably there was less traffic in the metropolitan areas we passed. We did check into all of those motels, and probably that is the biggest risk of exposure we have faced. We stopped in a Whole Foods Market in each major city we passed to get lunch and/or supplies for subsequent dinner, which we prepared in our hotel room with a hot plate and toaster oven we brought with us in the car. Some nights we stopped in two hotels, one to prepare our dinner and another to actually sleep. It added up to about 1,700 miles, 3,000 kilometers, and about 28 hours of actual driving.

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...

Good to know that you've landed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 10, 2020, 08:35:33 AM
Quote from: j winter on April 10, 2020, 08:14:18 AM
OK, that's a bit nuts... if I'm already at the supermarket, does it really increase the chance of infection if I throw some Doritos into the cart?  Seriously...  ???


And besides, perhaps the poor guy's wife is expecting, in which case God knows what may be essential...  :laugh:

+ 1. Pushing things too far is crazy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 10, 2020, 08:45:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 09, 2020, 02:00:29 PM
Nice. Borrowing this.
Is that a prescription pad that it's holding?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on April 10, 2020, 08:45:23 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.

I think it was more the police chief saying that on that TV interview that wanted to put a (firm but fair) point across about the coming Easter weekend but got a bit carried away and became overzealous. As you said, he got talked to and they backtracked on his comments.

On the other hand, they should do more than just giving "warnings" to the covidiots who purposely still do house or street parties (beyond household residents that is). In our neck of the woods, Great Manchester Police intervened on over 490+ parties in the whole Manchester area over 2weeks. Some of them with DJ's and bouncy castles.... why that is just warned and not punished is beyond me...

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-map-parties-coronavirus-lockdown-18067390 (https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-map-parties-coronavirus-lockdown-18067390)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 10, 2020, 08:49:31 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 10, 2020, 07:41:09 AM
Police are banning people from using their own front gardens and patrolling the aisles of supermarkets looking for shoppers purchasing 'non-essential' items. Like living in an Orwellian dystopia. The govt. has had to back-track on this lunacy now. This was once a free country but now one may risk arrest for 'going for a walk' and 'doing the shopping'.

Ah, it looks like some of the police were being arses but the government have since told them off.

"People can buy whatever they want from shops that remain open" and "people can use their gardens as they wish".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52245937 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52245937)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vers la flamme on April 10, 2020, 08:56:10 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 10, 2020, 08:45:14 AM
Is that a prescription pad that it's holding?

Toilet paper, looks like.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 10, 2020, 08:59:38 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

To recap, I accepted a new job two months ago, sold the house, planned my move, then the pandemic hit. By some miracle, the house closing went through, the movers came on April 3rd, and we left that evening to drive from Central Coast California to the Houston Texas area. We stopped the first night in Pasadena, lunched the next morning in Palm Springs, CA, slept the next night in Phoenix AZ. The next day we lunched in Tucson AZ, had diner in Les Cruces NM, and slept in El Paso Texas. Got up, had lunch in Van Horn Texas, lunch in Odessa Texas and slept in Abilene Texas. The last day we lunched in Dallas Texas and arrived in Spring Texas.

Things were surprisingly normal, with a few odd touches. We had to talk to hotel clerks through the night check-in window, or from behind a plexiglass barrier. But everything was functioning more or less normally. Probably there was less traffic in the metropolitan areas we passed. We did check into all of those motels, and probably that is the biggest risk of exposure we have faced. We stopped in a Whole Foods Market in each major city we passed to get lunch and/or supplies for subsequent dinner, which we prepared in our hotel room with a hot plate and toaster oven we brought with us in the car. Some nights we stopped in two hotels, one to prepare our dinner and another to actually sleep. It added up to about 1,700 miles, 3,000 kilometers, and about 28 hours of actual driving.

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...
Good to hear that all went well!  And hope that settling in goes event-free too.   :)

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 10, 2020, 09:19:15 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 10, 2020, 08:06:29 AM
Good to hear. I wish you and your family my best in your new location.

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 10, 2020, 10:02:20 AM

     Iceland finds that half its citizens with coronavirus have shown no symptoms (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/iceland-finds-that-half-its-citizens-with-coronavirus-have-shown-no-symptoms-2020-04-10?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo)

     This is a good number because Iceland has tested 10% of its population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 10, 2020, 10:13:43 AM
Good for them, but when a country's total population equals that of a any medium-sized European city, the number doesn't really mean that much.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 10, 2020, 10:31:08 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 10, 2020, 10:13:43 AM
Good for them, but when a country's total population equals that of a any medium-sized European city, the number doesn't really mean that much.

It means something because of the fraction of the population that has been tested. The uncertainty is due to sampling bias (testing is strongly biased towards people with symptoms). Someone needs to obtain a data set with completely random sampling to see what fraction of infected are completely asymptomatic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 10, 2020, 11:45:19 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 10, 2020, 10:31:08 AM
It means something because of the fraction of the population that has been tested. The uncertainty is due to sampling bias (testing is strongly biased towards people with symptoms). Someone needs to obtain a data set with completely random sampling to see what fraction of infected are completely asymptomatic.

    The article says they are doing random testing, so they could have a sample size large enough to be confident of the results.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 10, 2020, 12:47:52 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 10, 2020, 11:45:19 AM
    The article says they are doing random testing, so they could have a sample size large enough to be confident of the results.
More is better of course but this is correct. If they have a random sample size 35000 that's big enough to be pretty confident of that number.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 10, 2020, 02:43:55 PM
The Hill:

Poll: 59 percent of voters more concerned about rolling back social distancing too soon than economic fallout (https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/492271-poll-59-of-voters-more-concerned-about-rolling-back-social)


The Guardian

China outraged after Brazil minister suggests Covid-19 is part of 'plan for world domination' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/07/china-outraged-after-brazil-minister-suggests-covid-19-is-part-of-plan-for-world-domination)

"China has demanded an explanation from Brazil after the far-right government's education minister linked the coronavirus pandemic to Beijing's "plan for world domination", in a tweet imitating a Chinese accent."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 10, 2020, 06:06:02 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 09, 2020, 09:31:16 PM
For those of you who have noticed my whining, I finished my relocation.

To recap, I accepted a new job two months ago, sold the house, planned my move, then the pandemic hit. By some miracle, the house closing went through, the movers came on April 3rd, and we left that evening to drive from Central Coast California to the Houston Texas area. We stopped the first night in Pasadena, lunched the next morning in Palm Springs, CA, slept the next night in Phoenix AZ. The next day we lunched in Tucson AZ, had diner in Les Cruces NM, and slept in El Paso Texas. Got up, had lunch in Van Horn Texas, lunch in Odessa Texas and slept in Abilene Texas. The last day we lunched in Dallas Texas and arrived in Spring Texas.

Things were surprisingly normal, with a few odd touches. We had to talk to hotel clerks through the night check-in window, or from behind a plexiglass barrier. But everything was functioning more or less normally. Probably there was less traffic in the metropolitan areas we passed. We did check into all of those motels, and probably that is the biggest risk of exposure we have faced. We stopped in a Whole Foods Market in each major city we passed to get lunch and/or supplies for subsequent dinner, which we prepared in our hotel room with a hot plate and toaster oven we brought with us in the car. Some nights we stopped in two hotels, one to prepare our dinner and another to actually sleep. It added up to about 1,700 miles, 3,000 kilometers, and about 28 hours of actual driving.

Anyway, we survived, we are here. Now we wait and see if we got the virus...
Thanks for letting us know and glad to hear you made it successfully. You will have some stories to tell one day, but for now, I bet you are happy to be in one place. And will be happier still if everyone is virus free. Stay healthy!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 10, 2020, 07:36:34 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 10, 2020, 08:45:14 AM
Is that a prescription pad that it's holding?

A roll of bath tissue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 10, 2020, 07:42:21 PM
Quote from: vers la flamme on April 10, 2020, 08:56:10 AM
Toilet paper, looks like.

Aye, I think P.D. must have been misled by the cheerful Easter pink color
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 10, 2020, 11:17:12 PM
Thanks for everyone's good wishes. To add to my triumph, I've found toilet paper at the local Walmart!

They say everything is bigger in Texas, and that certainly applies to the Target, the Walmart, and the Whole Foods Market. Even the apples are huge. Producers must sort by size, sending the big ones to Texas and the dainty ones to California.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 12:03:13 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 10, 2020, 11:17:12 PM
Thanks for everyone's good wishes. To add to my triumph, I've found toilet paper at the local Walmart!

They say everything is bigger in Texas, and that certainly applies to the Target, the Walmart, and the Whole Foods Market. Even the apples are huge. Producers must sort by size, sending the big ones to Texas and the dainty ones to California.

My own memory of Texas were restaurants where if you ate a 1kg steak you didn't have to pay. And the horror of driving through Dallas in rush hour.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 12:03:55 AM
Recovered coronavirus patients test positive again in blow to immunity hopes

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/04/10/south-korea-reports-recovered-coronavirus-patients-testing-positive/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 11, 2020, 12:08:04 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on April 10, 2020, 08:45:23 AM
I think it was more the police chief saying that on that TV interview that wanted to put a (firm but fair) point across about the coming Easter weekend but got a bit carried away and became overzealous. As you said, he got talked to and they backtracked on his comments.

On the other hand, they should do more than just giving "warnings" to the covidiots who purposely still do house or street parties (beyond household residents that is). In our neck of the woods, Great Manchester Police intervened on over 490+ parties in the whole Manchester area over 2weeks. Some of them with DJ's and bouncy castles.... why that is just warned and not punished is beyond me...

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-map-parties-coronavirus-lockdown-18067390 (https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-map-parties-coronavirus-lockdown-18067390)

Police stopped a car heading to the Lake District with a Kayak strapped to the roof!

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/yorkshire-kayakers-turned-back-police-en-route-lake-windermere-2534791
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 12:15:38 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 12:03:55 AM
Recovered coronavirus patients test positive again in blow to immunity hopes

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/04/10/south-korea-reports-recovered-coronavirus-patients-testing-positive/

From the article:
"False test results could also be at fault, other experts said, or remnants of the virus could still be in patients' systems without being infectious or posing a risk of danger to the host or others.
"There are different interpretations and many variables
,"

One of the aspects of this seems to be that the new tests were made just a few days after the sickness and an intermediary test showing no infection. From what I've heard, the time-span is limited between the tests.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2020, 01:00:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 12:15:38 AM
From the article:
"False test results could also be at fault, other experts said, or remnants of the virus could still be in patients' systems without being infectious or posing a risk of danger to the host or others.
"There are different interpretations and many variables
,"

One of the aspects of this seems to be that the new tests were made just a few days after the sickness and an intermediary test showing no infection. From what I've heard, the time-span is limited between the tests.

Agreed. Though not (yet) scientifically proven (never say never), I understand that it is highly unlikely that overcoming the virus wouldn't create immunity. At this point unreliable test results and a possible relapse seem more likely explanations. On the other hand it seems that the nature and more specifically the expected duration of any immune response is still unclear.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2020, 01:20:43 AM
An explanation of the financial measures by the EU:

Coronavirus in Europe: How will the EU €500bn rescue deal help people and businesses? (https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/10/coronavirus-in-europe-how-will-the-eu-500bn-rescue-deal-help-people-and-businesses)

So, as I understand there is now agreement on an emergency fund, but there wil be further negotiations on a recovery fund.

This crisis has brought the design flaws of the eurozone back to the fore: a common currency without a common economic policy or real common budgetary rules. The Southern states are crippled by debts in a strong euro that they cannot devalue like a national currency. The Northern states are now pressured to accept mutualisation of national debts by the issue of eurobonds, effectively making their tax payers liable for the expenses by Southern states without being able to influence those expenses. Like before, the chosen option for the emergency is a transfer option: cheap loans facilitated by the wealthier member states.

But this whole issue will keep coming back until it is resolved.
Something which will be extremely difficult and painful: taxpayers in the wealthy member states do not want to sign blank cheques,  poorer member states do not want their economic and budgetary policies to be dictated from Brussels.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2020, 01:50:40 AM
I think it is safe to conclude that from all developed counties the US, with its most expensive health care system on the planet, is showing the worst performance in coping with the coronavirus:

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fb5e50ffe-7b71-11ea-af44-daa3def9ae03?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

This sad situation sheds an interesting light on the everlasting discussion on the US healthcare system. For me as an outsider it's striking that a country that prides itself on its capitalism is involved in wasting money (and human lives) on such an epic scale and to such detrimental effect to its society.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 02:44:08 AM
Quote from: Que on April 11, 2020, 01:20:43 AM
An explanation of the financial measures by the EU:

Coronavirus in Europe: How will the EU €500bn rescue deal help people and businesses? (https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/10/coronavirus-in-europe-how-will-the-eu-500bn-rescue-deal-help-people-and-businesses)

So, as I understand there is now agreement on an emergency fund, but there wil be further negotiations on a recovery fund.

This crisis has brought the design flaws of the eurozone back to the fore: a common currency without a common economic policy or real common budgetary rules. The Southern states are crippled by debts in a strong euro that they cannot devalue like a national currency. The Northern states are now pressured to accept mutualisation of national debts by the issue of eurobonds, effectively making their tax payers liable for the expenses by Southern states without being able to influence those expenses. Like before, the chosen option for the emergency is a transfer option: cheap loans facilitated by the wealthier member states.

But this whole issue will keep coming back until it is resolved.
Something which will be extremely difficult and painful: taxpayers in the wealthy member states do not want to sign blank cheques,  poorer member states do not want their economic and budgetary policies to be dictated from Brussels.


Yes. And of course pointing this out does not make one a eurosceptic. More like a eurorealist, I'd say.

The policies though are dictated not so much from Brussels which is just an umbrella, but rather from Berlin and The Hague.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2020, 03:04:12 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 02:44:08 AM
Yes. And of course pointing this out does not make one a eurosceptic. More like a eurorealist, I'd say.

The policies though are dictated not so much from Brussels which is just an umbrella, but rather from Berlin and The Hague.  ;D

Like I said before, the centre of power of the EU is not in Brussels but in Berlin, with Paris as its necessary partner.... and with The Hague as its little helper..... ;)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 11, 2020, 04:00:28 AM
Boston's major hospitals so far staying ahead of high demand for ICU beds (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/10/nation/bostons-major-hospitals-so-far-staying-ahead-high-demand-intensive-care/?et_rid=899073679&s_campaign=todaysheadlines:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 11, 2020, 04:08:04 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 11, 2020, 12:08:04 AM
Police stopped a car heading to the Lake District with a Kayak strapped to the roof!

Am I wrong thinking Kayaking is a great way to do social distancing...  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 11, 2020, 04:20:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 11, 2020, 04:00:28 AM
Boston's major hospitals so far staying ahead of high demand for ICU beds (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/10/nation/bostons-major-hospitals-so-far-staying-ahead-high-demand-intensive-care/?et_rid=899073679&s_campaign=todaysheadlines:newsletter)
Good news! Let's hope it continues like that. Stay safe, Karl!
Quote from: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 02:44:08 AM
Yes. And of course pointing this out does not make one a eurosceptic. More like a eurorealist, I'd say.

The policies though are dictated not so much from Brussels which is just an umbrella, but rather from Berlin and The Hague.  ;D
Every time there's a crisis, any crisis, the end of the EU is announced. And yet, here it is, and I daresay the vast majority of the citizens of the EU are convinced that they're better off with the Union than without it.

The real present danger is IMHO some politicians using the EU as a bargaining chip in vis-à-vis their domestic voter base. For instance, Pedro Sánchez is openly saying that if the EU does not meet his demands (which I don't argue he cannot make in these exceptional circumstances, but that are unreasonable and will probably never be met), then Europe is abandoning us to our fate and failing as a concept. He thus, dangerously, plants the seeds of euroscepticism in Spain, thinking only of his own personal political advantage. Let's see how this all evolves, but I do hope (and actually think) the European "spirit" is stronger than all this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 04:55:57 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 11, 2020, 04:20:09 AM
Good news! Let's hope it continues like that. Stay safe, Karl!Every time there's a crisis, any crisis, the end of the EU is announced. And yet, here it is, and I daresay the vast majority of the citizens of the EU are convinced that they're better off with the Union than without it.

I am convinced of that myself, Romania benefitted enormously from its EU membership. The last thing I'd want is EU's demise. But you have to admit things don't go well presently.

Quote
The real present danger is IMHO some politicians using the EU as a bargaining chip in vis-à-vis their domestic voter base. For instance, Pedro Sánchez is openly saying that if the EU does not meet his demands (which I don't argue he cannot make in these exceptional circumstances, but that are unreasonable and will probably never be met), then Europe is abandoning us to our fate and failing as a concept. He thus, dangerously, plants the seeds of euroscepticism in Spain, thinking only of his own personal political advantage. Let's see how this all evolves, but I do hope (and actually think) the European "spirit" is stronger than all this.

I said it before twice but you apparently avoid addressing this point: Pedro Sanchez is the head of a governmental coalition which has the majority in the Cortes so he can rightfully claim to represent the will of the majority of the Spaniards.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 11, 2020, 05:05:30 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 04:55:57 AM
I said it before twice but you apparently avoid addressing this point: Pedro Sanchez is the head of a governmental coalition which has the majority in the Cortes so he can rightfully claim to represent the will of the majority of the Spaniards.  ;D
Remember, querido amigo, "the end never justifies the means".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 05:19:59 AM
So what's happening in the states? And people not getting intensive care? Or are more people (pro rata compared with Europe) dying in intensive care? Are more people catching the disease?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 11, 2020, 05:25:43 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 11, 2020, 05:05:30 AM
Remember, querido amigo, "the end never justifies the means".

Oh, I agree --- but the crux of the matter is this: imagine the fantasies of the Sanchez/Iglesias gang could momentarily come true. How many Spaniards would reject the offer as being dangerous and unfeasible on the long term? Not enough to form a majority, methinks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 11, 2020, 05:33:39 AM
Quote from: Que on April 11, 2020, 01:00:28 AM
Agreed. Though not (yet) scientifically proven (never say never), I understand that it is highly unlikely that overcoming the virus wouldn't create immunity. At this point unreliable test results and a possible relapse seem more likely explanations. On the other hand it seems that the nature and more specifically the expected duration of any immune response is still unclear.

Q

SARS might be a precedent. Patients tested after a year showed almost no residual levels of antibody, but did show signs of resistance to infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 11, 2020, 05:43:03 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 05:19:59 AM
So what's happening in the states? And people not getting intensive care? Or are more people (pro rata compared with Europe) dying in intensive care? Are more people catching the disease?

I can't speak to details, but things are mighty rough in New York.

In Mass. Total confirmed cases ca. 21k
Total confirmed hospitalized: almost 2,000
599 deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:50:07 AM
I saw an interesting article about outdoor exercise:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/belgian-study-on-safe-distancing-while-exercising-goes-viral/
Apparently moving hikers, runners, cyclists etc. have an increased "safe distance" due to aerodynamic effects, especially in the "slipstream".
That's topical in my area - rural but 3 hours from NYC, overwhelmed with renters and second home owners from the metro area. Rail trails, bike paths, hiking trails have become overcrowded and a bit scary.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 05:56:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 10, 2020, 07:42:21 PM
Aye, I think P.D. must have been misled by the cheerful Easter pink color
I was thinking that they were Bunnies, MD and were waiting on patients.   ;)  That, and I only buy plain TP, paper towels, and napkins.  ;D

Heard that PM Johnson is slowly getting better.  From what I remember hearing, he could only take a few steps before getting winded?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:57:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 11, 2020, 05:43:03 AM
I can't speak to details, but things are mighty rough in New York.

In Mass. Total confirmed cases ca. 21k
Total confirmed hospitalized: almost 2,000
599 deaths.

You can find official NY State rundown (with a lag of 1 to 2 days) at https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Map

In counties outside the metropolitan area, I suspect so little testing is being done that it's impossible to draw any sensible conclusions. I'll spare you any more links, but every county has one (with a similar lag of 1-2 days). For instance, Delaware County (rural county just West of me) has only conducted 353 tests to date.
[Karl, some of your music was performed in Stamford (Delaware Co.) a few years ago. I would have gone, but there was a big snowstorm.]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:01:17 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 10, 2020, 11:17:12 PM
Thanks for everyone's good wishes. To add to my triumph, I've found toilet paper at the local Walmart!

They say everything is bigger in Texas, and that certainly applies to the Target, the Walmart, and the Whole Foods Market. Even the apples are huge. Producers must sort by size, sending the big ones to Texas and the dainty ones to California.
Woo hoo!  Well done you!   ;D

And, yes, I've heard that too.  Looking forward to hearing your stories about your new life there.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:08:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 12:03:55 AM
Recovered coronavirus patients test positive again in blow to immunity hopes

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/04/10/south-korea-reports-recovered-coronavirus-patients-testing-positive/
Eek!  I suspect that it's a case of people not giving themselves enough time to get well and then trying to get back to 'high gear' again?  We'll find out though.  Sorry to hear it in any event. I wish them well.   :(  And wish the doctors/researchers much wisdom, courage, patience, and strength in fighting the good fight!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:12:48 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 11, 2020, 12:08:04 AM
Police stopped a car heading to the Lake District with a Kayak strapped to the roof!

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/yorkshire-kayakers-turned-back-police-en-route-lake-windermere-2534791
Takes all kinds Irons!   ::)  >:(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 11, 2020, 06:14:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 11, 2020, 05:19:59 AM
So what's happening in the states? And people not getting intensive care? Or are more people (pro rata compared with Europe) dying in intensive care? Are more people catching the disease?
It varies by region, as one would expect. The virus takes time and contact to spread.
Some places are very hard hit. NY City and environs are the worst, but also New Orleans and Detroit. These areas were slow to distance, and had many travelers from hot spots.
Distancing has proven effective. This has led many to the conclusion the whole thing is overblown. That's a ridiculous conclusion of course.
This past week over 10,000 deaths.
Most measures are decided and mandated at the state level. Nearly every state has some sort of stay at home order, some stricter than others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:15:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 11, 2020, 04:00:28 AM
Boston's major hospitals so far staying ahead of high demand for ICU beds (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/10/nation/bostons-major-hospitals-so-far-staying-ahead-high-demand-intensive-care/?et_rid=899073679&s_campaign=todaysheadlines:newsletter)
Can't see the article, but sounds like good news--which we need now more than ever!   :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:20:55 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:50:07 AM
I saw an interesting article about outdoor exercise:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/belgian-study-on-safe-distancing-while-exercising-goes-viral/
Apparently moving hikers, runners, cyclists etc. have an increased "safe distance" due to aerodynamic effects, especially in the "slipstream".
That's topical in my area - rural but 3 hours from NYC, overwhelmed with renters and second home owners from the metro area. Rail trails, bike paths, hiking trails have become overcrowded and a bit scary.
Sorry to hear that T. D.

When did Gov. Cuomo issue the 'stay in place' order?  And did more people travel north after that?  Are you finding that the grocery stores are a lot more crowded too and/or running out of supplies/food?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 06:28:57 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:20:55 AM
Sorry to hear that T. D.

When did Gov. Cuomo issue the 'stay in place' order?  And did more people travel north after that?  Are you finding that the grocery stores are a lot more crowded too and/or running out of supplies/food?

PD
Cuomo issued the order March 20. I think people have continued to travel north. Local towns have required AirB&B (hugely popular rental service) stays to run for at least 2 weeks (to avoid transient / sanitary problems) and offers for rental properties keep popping up.
Supermarkets have been horrible since early March. The urbanites have greatly increased local population, and they also hoard to an offensive degree. I go to farmstands or out-of-the-way places to shop for produce or tofu (I'm vegetarian). Fortunately, many local  businesses which would otherwise be closed have begun acting as conduits for local farmers, so the situation is improving. However, one has to make multiple stops and plan to visit only after wholesaler deliveries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on April 11, 2020, 06:31:23 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:57:41 AM
You can find official NY State rundown (with a lag of 1 to 2 days) at https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Map

In counties outside the metropolitan area, I suspect so little testing is being done that it's impossible to draw any sensible conclusions. I'll spare you any more links, but every county has one (with a similar lag of 1-2 days). For instance, Delaware County (rural county just West of me) has only conducted 353 tests to date.
[Karl, some of your music was performed in Stamford (Delaware Co.) a few years ago. I would have gone, but there was a big snowstorm.]

I'm in Essex County NY. I read that in Franklin County, in addition to the small number (single digits I believe) of confirmed cases, 113 untested individuals potentially infected with covid-19 were sent home to self-quarantine. So, I believe we can draw one sensible conclusion: that the actual number of cases is vastly larger than the number of confirmed cases in the official stats. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 11, 2020, 06:36:29 AM
Yes, the fast biker's slipstream is a thing, particularly because speed does something to us.

We become less concerned about the slow people.

I cannot help but see dichotomies opening everywhere. Whether it's young people vs old vulnerable people, or careful, concerned people and those who need to act as if they're Lance Armstrong...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:38:41 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 06:28:57 AM
Cuomo issued the order March 20. I think people have continued to travel north. Local towns have restricted AirB&B (hugely popular rental service) stays to 2 weeks and offers for rental properties keep popping up.
Supermarkets have been horrible since early March. The urbanites have greatly increased local population, and they also hoard to an offensive degree. I go to farmstands or out-of-the-way places to shop for produce or tofu (I'm vegetarian). Fortunately, many local  businesses which would otherwise be closed have begun acting as conduits for local farmers, so the situation is improving. However, one has to make multiple stops and plan to visit only after wholesaler deliveries.
I had suspected as much (re travel); can't believe that people are still trying to rent out properties right now!  Can the police do anything about those? Good to hear that the farmers have sources to sell their produce to.  What kind of businesses are offering their produce for sale?  I'm grateful that we have various farmers markets not too far away.  In warmer weather, you can also see a fair number of farm stands set up alongside roads in front of farms and they go by the honor system too.  Choose your produce and put your money in a lock box (nowadays chained/secured to the stand); one used to be able to make change....ah, the good ole days.  You sometimes hear about someone's box being stolen.   >:( :(

Wondering whether or not this is commonly done in other countries?  I'd like to think so (not the being stolen part).

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 06:39:57 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:50:07 AM
I saw an interesting article about outdoor exercise:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/belgian-study-on-safe-distancing-while-exercising-goes-viral/
Apparently moving hikers, runners, cyclists etc. have an increased "safe distance" due to aerodynamic effects, especially in the "slipstream".
That's topical in my area - rural but 3 hours from NYC, overwhelmed with renters and second home owners from the metro area. Rail trails, bike paths, hiking trails have become overcrowded and a bit scary.

Quote from: Herman on April 11, 2020, 06:36:29 AM
Yes, the fast biker's slipstream is a thing, particularly because speed does something to us.

We become less concerned about the slow people.

I cannot help but see dichotomies opening everywhere. Whether it's young people vs old vulnerable people, or careful, concerned people and those who need to act as if they're Lance Armstrong...

This very worrying story has quickly been promoted by many newspapers on an international scale, but usually without any critical comments.

If taken seriously, it would more or less mean that staying indoor in urban areas with a good deal of cyclists and runners on the streets would be the only way to avoid the virus - or that runners and cyclists had to be banned. Since keeping a distance of 20 m to the nearest cyclist would be impossible, and with public transport being not recommended in many places, it would mean that people would be quite 'grounded' indoor.

However, the Belgian study seems to have been accepted much too early - this article more or less debunks the apparent conclusions as being much too hasty and not really reliable:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74az9/the-viral-study-about-runners-spreading-coronavirus-is-not-actually-a-study

That said, I feel uncomfortable with heavy-breathing runners in particular, and I try to keep a good deal of distance to them when in town, mostly on my bicycle. Similarly, I keep distance to other cyclists and passing pedestrians on the sidewalk. And I try to keep my mouth shut ... Many of the runners just don't seem to have a similar politeness. In Copenhagen, it's been tried to put up signs saying "one-way paths for runners" in the parks, but only with limited results, since it's only partly being lived up to by them.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 06:43:13 AM
Oxford university people hoping to have a vaccine ready for general use maybe in September 2020, says professor Sarah Gilbert.
Testing should begin in a couple of weeks.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ee596cb8-7b71-11ea-a9b3-a42d54022bdc

(paywall for the complete article)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:44:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 06:39:57 AM
This very worrying story has quickly been promoted by many newspapers on an international scale, but usually without any critical comments.

If taken seriously, it would more or less mean that staying indoor in urban areas with a good deal of cyclists and runners on the streets would be the only way to avoid the virus - or that runners and cyclists had to be banned. Since keeping a distance of 20 m to the nearest cyclist would be impossible.

However, the Belgian study seems to have been accepted much too early - this article more or less debunks the apparent conclusions as being much too hasty
and not really reliable:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74az9/the-viral-study-about-runners-spreading-coronavirus-is-not-actually-a-study

That said, I feel uncomfortable with heavy-breathing runners in particular, and I try to keep a good deal of distance to them when in town, mostly on my bicycle. Similarly, I keep distance to other cyclists and passing pedestrians on the sidewalk. Many of the runners just don't seem to have a similar politeness. In Copenhagen, it's been tried to put up signs saying "one-way paths for runners" in the parks, but only with limited results, since it's only partly being lived up to by them.
I remember hearing something on the news not too long ago basically saying that as fast as you are, you can't outrun a sneeze.  I saw one article saying that a sneeze can travel up to 93 mph!  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 11, 2020, 06:48:20 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 05:57:41 AM
You can find official NY State rundown (with a lag of 1 to 2 days) at https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Map

In counties outside the metropolitan area, I suspect so little testing is being done that it's impossible to draw any sensible conclusions. I'll spare you any more links, but every county has one (with a similar lag of 1-2 days). For instance, Delaware County (rural county just West of me) has only conducted 353 tests to date.
[Karl, some of your music was performed in Stamford (Delaware Co.) a few years ago. I would have gone, but there was a big snowstorm.]

I remember that snowstorm! It's kind of you to remember the occasion!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 11, 2020, 06:50:57 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:15:38 AM
Can't see the article, but sounds like good news--which we need now more than ever!   :)

There's an algorithm that's baffling me; the Globe says the coronavirus articles are available generally, but I am chancing to try to share articles which are subscriber-only.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 06:57:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 06:39:57 AM
This very worrying story has quickly been promoted by many newspapers on an international scale, but usually without any critical comments.

If taken seriously, it would more or less mean that staying indoor in urban areas with a good deal of cyclists and runners on the streets would be the only way to avoid the virus - or that runners and cyclists had to be banned. Since keeping a distance of 20 m to the nearest cyclist would be impossible. and with public transport being not recommended in many places, it would mean that people would be quite 'grounded' indoor.

However, the Belgian study seems to have been accepted much too early - this article more or less debunks the apparent conclusions as being much too hasty promoted and not really reliable:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74az9/the-viral-study-about-runners-spreading-coronavirus-is-not-actually-a-study

That said, I feel uncomfortable with heavy-breathing runners in particular, and I try to keep a good deal of distance to them when in town, mostly on my bicycle. Similarly, I keep distance to other cyclists and passing pedestrians on the sidewalk. And I try to keep my mouth shut ... Many of the runners just don't seem to have a similar politeness. In Copenhagen, it's been tried to put up signs saying "one-way paths for runners" in the parks, but only with limited results, since it's only partly being lived up to by them.

Good points. I must (selfishly) admit that I live in a remote rural area, so it's easy to maintain extreme distances while exercising.
However, I pass by parking lots / trailheads for hiking trails and "rail trails" (multiuse paths) and see high numbers of cars, so I suspect some unsafe behavior is occurring.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 06:59:54 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 06:38:41 AM
I had suspected as much (re travel); can't believe that people are still trying to rent out properties right now!  Can the police do anything about those? Good to hear that the farmers have sources to sell their produce to.  What kind of businesses are offering their produce for sale?  I'm grateful that we have various farmers markets not too far away.  In warmer weather, you can also see a fair number of farm stands set up alongside roads in front of farms and they go by the honor system too.  Choose your produce and put your money in a lock box (nowadays chained/secured to the stand); one used to be able to make change....ah, the good ole days.  You sometimes hear about someone's box being stolen.   >:( :(

Wondering whether or not this is commonly done in other countries?  I'd like to think so (not the being stolen part).

Best wishes,

PD

Yes, in my area I still see people operating this way. Usually individuals or families who have a box on a post at the end of their driveways.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 07:05:39 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 11, 2020, 06:57:48 AM
Good points. I must (selfishly) admit that I live in a remote rural area, so it's easy to maintain extreme distances while exercising.
However, I pass by parking lots / trailheads for hiking trails and "rail trails" (multiuse paths) and see high numbers of cars, so I suspect some unsafe behavior is occurring.

In some ways, a big privilege these days, provided one can buy provisions relatively easily & keep a sufficient income ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 11, 2020, 07:11:53 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 11, 2020, 04:08:04 AM
Am I wrong thinking Kayaking is a great way to do social distancing...  :P

You are not wrong but enjoying yourself is. With NHS staff working 12 hour shifts you can't have idiots poncing around.

The guy I mentioned earlier in the thread diagnosed with coronavirus has returned home from hospital. I don't know him personally but what I am hearing is not good. He is very weak but worse then that is the psychological hit, he is very emotional. In a bed opposite was a chap in a bad way, he thrashed his arms about as if he was drowning and shortly after died. For fellow patients and medical staff to witness scenes like this will lead to depression and other problems in the future. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 07:13:38 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 07:05:39 AM
In some ways, a big privilege these days, provided one can buy provisions relatively easily & keep a sufficient income ...
Home gardens/community gardens (allotments) can be a godsend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 07:15:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 07:13:38 AM
Home gardens/community gardens (allotments) can be a godsend!

Indeed. Unfortunately, they tend to cost a fortune in my city, not to mention summer houses (where going there now is more problematic however, also for the locals in summer house areas)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 07:19:43 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 11, 2020, 07:11:53 AM
You are not wrong but enjoying yourself is. With NHS staff working 12 hour shifts you can't have idiots poncing around.

The guy I mentioned earlier in the thread diagnosed with coronavirus has returned home from hospital. I don't know him personally but what I am hearing is not good. He is very weak but worse then that is the psychological hit, he is very emotional. In a bed opposite was a chap in a bad way, he thrashed his arms about as if he was drowning and shortly after died. For fellow patients and medical staff to witness scenes like this will lead to depression and other problems in the future.
I think that the concerns are them interacting with locals (be it shopping for food...with resources possibly already strained for the locals), lodging locally, etc.

Horrible to read about that man.  I think that I missed your earlier posting about him.  Is this someone who lives in your area?  In any event, yes, hard for anyone who has to witness things like that even once.  Can't imagine day after day of witnessing similar things.  Hard enough to listen to/read the news much even without being inflicted with the virus (knock on wood).   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 07:23:33 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 07:15:26 AM
Indeed. Unfortunately, they tend to cost a fortune in my city, not to mention summer houses (where going there now is more problematic however, also for the locals in summer house areas)
MT,

Do you have any community gardens in Copenhagen?

Are co-ops popular in Denmark?  They can be helpful to keep food, etc. costs down.  I belong to one in my area.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 08:10:02 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 07:23:33 AM
MT,

Do you have any community gardens in Copenhagen?

Are co-ops popular in Denmark?  They can be helpful to keep food, etc. costs down.  I belong to one in my area.

PD

Yes, we have a thing called 'haveforening' ~garden association, or 'koloni-haver', ~gardens-somewhat-away, where you can also have a small cabin. They can be very cozy https://www.kolonihave-kreds1.dk/index.php/haveoversigt/haveoversigt/tag/2450%20SV
I think they exist in many countries & have seen them all European countries as well, but those abroad are not a subject I know much about.

Unofficially, some people stay there overnight at times. Due to the virus, regulations have now been lifted, so that you are able to stay there for longer periods. They are very sought after, expensive, and normally one has to be on a list for many years to obtain one, at least in city areas ... migration to cities and gentrification have contributed to making them more difficult to obtain.

Community gardens belonging to blocks are also becoming more popular nowadays, but slowly - corresponding to the efforts of making the city an even greener place.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 08:43:15 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 08:10:02 AM
Yes, we have a thing called 'haveforening' ~garden association, or 'koloni-haver', ~gardens-somewhat-away, where you can also have a small cabin. They can be very cozy https://www.kolonihave-kreds1.dk/index.php/haveoversigt/haveoversigt/tag/2450%20SV
I think they exist in many countries & have seen them all European countries as well, but those abroad are not a subject I know much about.

Unofficially, some people stay there overnight at times. Due to the virus, regulations have now been lifted, so that you are able to stay there for longer periods. They are very sought after, expensive, and normally one has to be on a list for many years to obtain one, at least in city areas ... migration to cities and gentrification have contributed to making them more difficult to obtain.

Community gardens belonging to blocks are also becoming more popular nowadays, but slowly - corresponding to the efforts of making the city an even greener place.
Thank you for telling me about them.  How neat!  I'm guessing that they were originally designed to be garden sheds but ended up morphing into tiny cabins?  And no proper plumbing?  Does one rent one of them from the city?  My guess would be that those with nicer cabins would be more expensive too?  Oh!  I just looked at a different community's ones:  theirs are quite a bit larger and I'm guessing might include plumbing and a way to cook too?  And maybe electricity?  In any event, very pretty!  Looks very relaxing too (though gardening can be a lot of work--I know!).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 11, 2020, 09:15:21 AM


     How Europe manages to keep a lid on coronavirus unemployment while it spikes in the U.S. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/how-europe-manages-to-keep-a-lid-on-coronavirus-unemployment-while-it-spikes-in-the-us/2020/04/11/29b23c90-7b4f-11ea-a311-adb1344719a9_story.html)

     It's not a how question. You do what's needed or you howyougonna the economy to death, the good old American way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 11, 2020, 09:26:21 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 08:43:15 AM
Thank you for telling me about them.  How neat!  I'm guessing that they were originally designed to be garden sheds but ended up morphing into tiny cabins?  And no proper plumbing?  Does one rent one of them from the city?  My guess would be that those with nicer cabins would be more expensive too?  Oh!  I just looked at a different community's ones:  theirs are quite a bit larger and I'm guessing might include plumbing and a way to cook too?  And maybe electricity?  In any event, very pretty!  Looks very relaxing too (though gardening can be a lot of work--I know!).

Conditions and facilities vary from place to place, often they are gardens with a small cabin for day use, but not always ... one needs to contact the individual association, not the city municipality, to be on waiting list. Originally they were meant for poor people and workers, and they expanded during the social-democratic movement's built-up of the welfare state.

When I search the web for one that is for sale in my district, the price for the first one mentioned is no less than DKK 950.000 ~125.000 Euros, including a cabin of 50 m2 with sleeping option. That is however more than many summer houses in the provinces, and no doubt one of the more expensive ones. Much cheaper ones exist as well; here's a tiny current list. There's a small annual fee as well.
https://www.dba.dk/boliger/fritidsbolig/kolonihaver/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 11, 2020, 02:30:41 PM
Thanks MT.   :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2020, 11:47:45 PM
I was waiting for the moment  this would come up, because untill there is a vaccine continued isolation is the only rational option for risk categories:

Elderly face whole year in lockdown (Guardian)

Elderly people may have to be kept isolated until the end of the year to protect them from the coronavirus, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has said.
"Without a vaccine, we have to limit as much as possible contact with the elderly," she told the Germany daily Bild.
"I know it's difficult and that isolation is a burden, but it is a question of life or death, we have to remain disciplined and patient. "Children and young people will enjoy more freedom of movement earlier than elderly people and those with pre-existing medical conditions," she said.

She said she hoped that a European laboratory will develop a vaccine towards the end of the year.
To ensure that people can be quickly vaccinated, authorities are already in talks with producers on gearing up for world production, she added.


Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 12:14:27 AM
Shouldn't there be enough data now to calculate with confidence how the expectation of developing a serious form of the disease depends on age and preexisting conditions?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 12:28:39 AM
Seems that the mere amount of virus one has gotten also plays a role in the severity, from what I've read. Also, yesterday you'd see a video with a British 99-year old war veteran in a wheelchair, cured and being pushed out of the hospital, to the acclaim of bystanders, whereas younger hospital staff have been severely hit at times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 12:40:44 AM
I think the really big question now is this. How do we organise ourselves so that the risk of transmission is acceptable, in the workplace, on public transport, at leisure?

I noticed yesterday that a Toyota car factory in France wants to open up again, the MD is saying that he's worked with medics to create a system which is safe. Here

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/maladie/coronavirus/coronavirus-j-ai-la-conviction-que-l-on-met-en-place-les-bons-gestes-barrieres-declare-le-dirigeant-de-l-usine-toyota-d-onnaing-qui-va-rouvrir-le-21-avril_3910991.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 12, 2020, 12:49:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 12:14:27 AM
Shouldn't there be enough data now to calculate with confidence how the expectation of developing a serious form of the disease depends on age and preexisting conditions?

Maybe concerning age-dependence. One only needs a sufficiently large group of healthy elderly to say. But it is more unpredictable as to preexisting conditions, since they may have various degrees of illness and also various degrees of treatment and often are combined (a diabetic with heart disease e.g.). And after all you only obtain statistics, which don't say much about our individual risk, which always is somewhere between 0% and 100%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 03:31:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 12:14:27 AM
Shouldn't there be enough data now to calculate with confidence how the expectation of developing a serious form of the disease depends on age and preexisting conditions?

Obesity, or BMI 30 and higher, seems to be a big factor, other than being age 65 plus.

Being male doesn't help either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 03:44:05 AM
Here they often say BMI 35+ - 40+.

Regarding normal influenza, our authorities said BMI 40+ back in 2019.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 12, 2020, 03:55:32 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 03:44:05 AM
Here they often say BMI 35+ - 40+.

Regarding normal influenza, our authorities said BMI 40+ back in 2019.

I have lost much of my respect to the health authorities here (Sundhedsstyrelsen & Statens Seruminstitut). It becomes more and more evident, that they haven't been sufficiently alert.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 04:05:07 AM
I agree, some obvious errors were made in handling and communication (parts were outsourced and privatized recently, it seems), but after all, those are probably measured statistics, not a question of efficiency. And they are trying to catch up, probably got more ressources too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 12, 2020, 04:14:06 AM
But isn't Denmark one of the countries that's best holding up in this crisis? I wish the Spanish administration (central and regional) had made Drnmark's mistakes  ::)  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 04:19:46 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 12, 2020, 04:14:06 AM
But isn't Denmark one of the countries that's best holding up in this crisis? I wish the Spanish administration (central and regional) had made Drnmark's mistakes  ::)  :(

Yes, overall it has so far been not so bad as feared, 273 fatalities in a population of almost 6 million, hospitalization curve going down, and ressources are not yet strained.  But there's been some problems with wrong advice and conflicting information, plus not being sufficiently prepared generally.

Sweden, by comparison, has many more fatalities and might be more strained, not to mention the Netherlands and Belgium, but Norway and Finland are probably the most successful in fighting the virus.

A big test is coming here, since a slow opening-up will start next week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on April 12, 2020, 05:02:39 AM
Japan is a country of 127 million. Reported deaths from the virus are about 100. Actually, I don't know how to understand Japan. We are in a state of emergency and all schools are closed. Yet, deaths remain few.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 05:28:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 04:19:46 AM
Norway and Finland are probably the most successful in fighting the virus.



That's because they support Bernie Sanders, obviously.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 05:32:52 AM
HE IS RISEN

Talking about Boris Johnson

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/12/boris-johnson-leaves-hospital-as-he-continues-recovery-from-coronavirus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 05:33:26 AM
Quote from: milk on April 12, 2020, 05:02:39 AM
Japan is a country of 127 million. Reported deaths from the virus are about 100. Actually, I don't know how to understand Japan. We are in a state of emergency and all schools are closed. Yet, deaths remain few.

Yes, New Zealand is another, insular example. But then, Vietnam is doing remarkably well too.



((obviously, in my post above, I was just relating to Denmark's ~neighbouring countries)).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 05:49:33 AM
Quote from: milk on April 12, 2020, 05:02:39 AM
Japan is a country of 127 million. Reported deaths from the virus are about 100. Actually, I don't know how to understand Japan. We are in a state of emergency and all schools are closed. Yet, deaths remain few.

Yes, there was a period like this in the UK about three weeks ago, or even less. I remember thinking "phoney war."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 12, 2020, 05:53:27 AM
"As New York – the US region with the highest number of positive COVID-19 cases – may be seeing cases slightly level off, other areas across the country are seeing rapid increases in the number of people infected.

[Below are charts] that show counties outside of the New York and New Jersey area that have the highest number of positive coronavirus cases, and how the virus is trending there. While not in the top 10, Massachusetts' Suffolk and Middlesex counties are at the 11th and 12th spots. (Boston is in Suffolk County, I reside in Middlesex)

For reference, New York City has 67,552 cases; Cook County in Illinois, the top of this list, has 8,043. All numbers are as of the end of the day April 5.

Cases per 1,000
When normalized for population, the picture changes.

For reference, New York City had 8.5 cases per 1,000 people as of April 5. Orleans Parish, which houses New Orleans, is the only area that exceeds this, with 10.4 cases. Three parishes in Louisiana are in the top 10, as is Massachusetts' Suffolk County."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 05:59:13 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 12, 2020, 03:31:22 AM
Obesity, or BMI 30 and higher, seems to be a big factor, other than being age 65 plus.

Being male doesn't help either.

Perhaps we should tell all the fat blokes to stay at home for the next twelve months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 12, 2020, 06:02:54 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/DFCLNlZ.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 06:03:31 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 12, 2020, 05:53:27 AM
"As New York – the US region with the highest number of positive COVID-19 cases – may be seeing cases slightly level off, other areas across the country are seeing rapid increases in the number of people infected.

[Below are charts] that show counties outside of the New York and New Jersey area that have the highest number of positive coronavirus cases, and how the virus is trending there. While not in the top 10, Massachusetts' Suffolk and Middlesex counties are at the 11th and 12th spots. (Boston is in Suffolk County, I reside in Middlesex)

For reference, New York City has 67,552 cases; Cook County in Illinois, the top of this list, has 8,043. All numbers are as of the end of the day April 5.

Cases per 1,000
When normalized for population, the picture changes.

For reference, New York City had 8.5 cases per 1,000 people as of April 5. Orleans Parish, which houses New Orleans, is the only area that exceeds this, with 10.4 cases. Three parishes in Louisiana are in the top 10, as is Massachusetts' Suffolk County."

If I understand right, it's pretty straightforward to predict when things will level off.

The average time from onset of symptoms to death is 18 days, and the disease incubates without symptoms for 5 days on average -- so a mean of 23 days from catching it to dying.

You should see a reduction in deaths about a month after social contact has been restricted, hospital admissions three weeks after.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 12, 2020, 06:12:46 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 06:03:31 AM
If I understand right, it's pretty straightforward to predict when things will level off.

The average time from onset of symptoms to death is 18 days, and the disease incubates without symptoms for 5 days on average -- so a mean of 23 days from catching it to dying.

You should see a reduction in deaths about a month after social contact has been restricted, hospital admissions three weeks after.

Reasonable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 06:28:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 05:32:52 AM
HE IS RISEN

Talking about Boris Johnson

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/12/boris-johnson-leaves-hospital-as-he-continues-recovery-from-coronavirus

Because of the love letters Carry / Crazy Girlfriend wrote, acc to the Mail.

So I suggest she starts writing love letters to other patients in dire straits.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christo on April 12, 2020, 06:39:52 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 12, 2020, 06:28:28 AM
Because of the love letters Carry / Crazy Girlfriend wrote, acc to the Mail.

So I suggest she starts writing love letters to other patients in dire straits.
She can actually write?  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on April 12, 2020, 06:54:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 12, 2020, 05:33:26 AM
Yes, New Zealand is another, insular example. But then, Vietnam is doing remarkably well too.



((obviously, in my post above, I was just relating to Denmark's ~neighbouring countries)).
Three somewhat divergent examples. NZ went early and went strict in closing down, as far as I understand it. But I don't know how much testing they did.  Vietnam has very little in the way infrastructure and isn't a democracy; they quarantined buildings and set up camps, too. Japan had its first case in January. Face masks might have prevented a rapid rise in cases early on but now things are moving along with a second sharp wave of infections. Still, until this week, Japan was pretty much open for business. There's a lot closed down now but no lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 12, 2020, 07:06:19 AM

     New Coronavirus Drug Shows Promise in Animal Tests (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:PqrGqvKOFzgJ:https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-coronavirus-drug-shows-promise-in-animal-tests1/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

EIDD-2801 inhibits the coronavirus's self-copying operations in a manner that is different from remdesivir. While remdesivir brings that replication process to a full stop, EIDD-2801 introduces mutations—mistakes—into the virus's RNA as it makes copies so that the viral RNA becomes so damaged that it cannot infect cells. Another feature of the drug is that it is able to work against a host of other RNA viruses. Thus, it could serve as a multipurpose antiviral, much in the way some antibiotics can work against a wide variety of bacteria. In several preclinical studies, researchers from multiple labs have shown that EIDD-2801 was effective against several strains of influenza, as well as the viruses for respiratory syncytial virus and the viruses for chikungunya, Venezuelan equine encephalitis and Eastern equine encephalitis—all microbes that intermittently pop up in different parts of the world and produce widespread sickness in their wake.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 12, 2020, 08:09:46 AM
It's strangely reassuring to see that, whatever the circumstances, some things never change: the political obsessions of some, the pettiness of others....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on April 12, 2020, 08:17:51 AM
Difficult to see a more simplistic analysis than that... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 12, 2020, 08:18:49 AM
Given the lack of testing, and the time lag in the spread of the virus and it's progression in each individual case (the three weeks Mandryka commented on), I would presume the US figure is not accurate.  Or at least I would be highly skeptical of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 08:19:06 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 12, 2020, 08:09:46 AM
It's strangely reassuring to see that, whatever the circumstances, some things never change: the political obsessions of some, the pettiness of others....
There are three kinds of Bayesians
Subjective Bayesians — priors are personal
Objective Bayesians — priors are based on maximum entropy calculations
Political Bayesians — priors never change
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DaveF on April 12, 2020, 08:42:03 AM
A great sadness to read of the death of veteran British comedian Tim Brooke-Taylor from the virus: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490).  Perhaps not an international star, but greatly loved at home.  I will make a pilgrimage to Mornington Crescent tube station at the earliest opportunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 09:03:40 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 12, 2020, 08:09:46 AM
It's strangely reassuring to see that, whatever the circumstances, some things never change: the political obsessions of some, the pettiness of others....

Strange, yeah, we hadn't realized yet this is about who's got the best corona.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 09:10:18 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 12, 2020, 08:18:49 AM
Given the lack of testing, and the time lag in the spread of the virus and it's progression in each individual case (the three weeks Mandryka commented on), I would presume the US figure is not accurate.  Or at least I would be highly skeptical of it.

It's not just a matter of accuracy, but also of timing. As Fauci explained (I believe it was to Trevor Noah), if you compare the impact of corona in the US, it helps to look at the US as several territories. So the first wave was Washington State and New York, and in the next wave other states will be hit hard.

The other thing is the numbers will be manipulated hard because Trump will want to declare a win for himself, in time for the election.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 09:14:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 09:11:37 AM

Very important.  Very informed.

It's wonderful to see you hale and well, Todd, and in such a lovely mood.

It was Fauci talking. So that's as informed as Fauci is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 12, 2020, 09:16:42 AM
Quote from: milk on April 12, 2020, 05:02:39 AM
Japan is a country of 127 million. Reported deaths from the virus are about 100. Actually, I don't know how to understand Japan. We are in a state of emergency and all schools are closed. Yet, deaths remain few.
If obesity is a factor, then the low obesity rates could be a factor here as well.

For the video of the bus driver who died here (i think it was NY) from getting it most likely from some lady who coughed on him, first thing I noticed was that, although he was younger-looking (30 or 40), he was clearly overweight.

What if all the fish and seaweed is helping out somehow?  :P 0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 12, 2020, 09:24:02 AM
Quote from: Christo on April 12, 2020, 06:39:52 AM
She can actually write?  ???

There's always copy-&-paste...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 12, 2020, 09:27:16 AM
Quote from: DaveF on April 12, 2020, 08:42:03 AM
A great sadness to read of the death of veteran British comedian Tim Brooke-Taylor from the virus: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490).  Perhaps not an international star, but greatly loved at home.  I will make a pilgrimage to Mornington Crescent tube station at the earliest opportunity.

Loved him in At Last the 1948 Show.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 09:37:08 AM
Quote from: Christo on April 12, 2020, 06:39:52 AM
She can actually write?  ???

Well, maybe not in Latin, the way Boris likes his love letters, but clearly whatever she wrote did the job.

He'll be dropping to his knee pretty soon (though there may be a previous entanglement?).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 12, 2020, 09:56:56 AM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 08:23:47 AM

US deaths will continue to rise.  If the revised (and lowered) predictions of 60K are accurate, it will be about three times as high as now, so roughly on par with France's official totals on a population basis.  All official totals are (significantly) understated if incompletely sourced journalistic scribblings from around the world are to be believed.

The total numbers, even in relation to the size of the total population, do not tell the real story about the effectiveness of the way an outbreak is handled... The sheer size of the total US population will blur out any (geographically concentrated) number of fatalities. The progression of the virus after initial contamination does give a more reliable picture:

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F4526c15a-7c38-11ea-82f6-150830b3b99a?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

Conclusion: the US isn't doing so swell. Although no Western country can be credited for responding  effectively....
I suspect that the bad US performance is mainly because its response was late, slow and uncoördinated. I could emphasise nature of the health care system, but since there is no real treatment I think that plays a secondary role to imposing social distancing.

Anyway, I'm  surprised you haven't celebrateted the demise of the power of federal government yet?
Since there seems ample reason to do so...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 12, 2020, 11:05:22 AM
France reports fewest new cases in a week; Italy deaths rise by 431, fewest in more than three weeks
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 12, 2020, 11:12:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 11:04:55 AM

On the upside, strain on the EU is growing.  It's a pity that the Fed couldn't use this as an opportunity to pick and choose more carefully which Yurpean institutions to aid.  It would have been delightful had the Fed been able to shut the ECB out.  It is true that no crisis should go to waste, and the current situation offers the US a rare, non-war opportunity to apply political and economic pressure to destroy the EU, though I doubt full advantage is taken of the opportunity.
Those aren't the words of just a petty little man, those are the words of a bastard...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 12, 2020, 11:57:59 AM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 11:15:39 AM

Good stuff.
Much obliged.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 02:41:51 PM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 09:20:39 AM

Fauci's statements and analyses, as well as statements, analyses, and summaries by a variety of other US professionals in the space, are available on the CDC website, state websites, and are often typically published in sources like the failing New York Times.  But it's good to see the The Daily Show referenced on GMG.  Very serious.  It lends gravitas to posts.

But government websites are famously being altered to reflect Trump's whimsy. In this climate and administration hearing the words straight out of Fauci's mouth no matter what the forum is, sadly, more reliable. And especially if Trump stops him from answering questions in settings of more "gravitas".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 02:50:09 PM

And you have evidence that the CDC site has been altered, or that it contradicts what Fauci says?

It has been altered several times. There have been multiple articles on the topic (from all sides). Google it if the topic interests you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 03:48:21 PM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 03:41:30 PM

So, you have no evidence.  Got it.
Welcome back.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 12, 2020, 04:11:31 PM
     
     I talked to a nurse today and asked about the NPR reported estimate that Massachusetts would hit the death peak around April 18. She thought it might be later.

     Oh shit, NPR must have just changed their estimate. It's now April 27. The death total (through July) is raised as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 03:48:21 PM
Welcome back.
He has a point. He asked for evidence. None was forthcoming. Then you snark. Why is asking for evidence objectionable?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 12, 2020, 05:24:39 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
He has a point. He asked for evidence. None was forthcoming. Then you snark. Why is asking for evidence objectionable?

Just so you understand, Todd, despite his very intelligent posts in the music threads, is, in the Diner threads just a plain troll, sneering, snarking, attempting to annoy and provoke and display his superiority to the rest of us mortals.  He doesn't really want evidence, he just wants a response he can use as material for his trolling.He's been away from the forum for a few months, and now returned, and picked up immediately on his usual behavior. 
71 dB at least believes in what he says and wants to convince the rest of us of the truth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 05:34:56 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 12, 2020, 05:24:39 PM
Just so you understand, Todd, despite his very intelligent posts in the music threads, is, in the Diner threads just a plain troll, sneering, snarking, attempting to annoy and provoke and display his superiority to the rest of us mortals.  He doesn't really want evidence, he just wants a response he can use as material for his trolling.He's been away from the forum for a few months, and now returned, and picked up immediately on his usual behavior. 
71 dB at least believes in what he says and wants to convince the rest of us of the truth.

With respect, I don't care about squabbles here. I am well aware of the animosities. I do care about the CDC site. I use it for information. So do people who actually have power and make decisions which affect the lives and welfare of millions. If the CDC information has been corrupted that is important. But it also strikes me as utterly fantastical to believe a cabal of the bureaucrats and scientists who staff the CDC are working to re-elect Donald Trump by falsifying data. I think it absurd, frankly. But I am willing to consider evidence.

I am also willing to draw conclusions about those who make such extraordinary charges without evidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 05:49:36 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
He has a point. He asked for evidence. None was forthcoming. Then you snark. Why is asking for evidence objectionable?
Ok, you're new, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Simon was talking about the sites being altered to reflect Trump's views. Here is an article that discusses, among other things, that very topic: https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news (https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news) (among others). It's not what I saw earlier, but it has much of the same info. It talks about how the stockpiles part of the site was altered, because of something Kushner said. Here's another: https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/ (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/). The Washington Post also had an article, but it seems to be behind a paywall for me. And another: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411 (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411).

I would hope that the serious medical info on the site would never be changed to reflect political views.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 12, 2020, 05:53:36 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 05:34:56 PM
With respect, I don't care about squabbles here. I am well aware of the animosities. I do care about the CDC site. I use it for information. So do people who actually have power and make decisions which affect the lives and welfare of millions. If the CDC information has been corrupted that is important. But it also strikes me as utterly fantastical to believe a cabal of the bureaucrats and scientists who staff the CDC are working to re-elect Donald Trump by falsifying data. I think it absurd, frankly. But I am willing to consider evidence.

I am also willing to draw conclusions about those who make such extraordinary charges without evidence.

Ah, you see that's the difference. You actually want information. Todd doesn't.
Quick google brings this up as most pertinent to COVID19.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21161693/cdc-coronavirus-testing-numbers-website-disappear-expansion-us
.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 06:05:16 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 05:49:36 PM
Ok, you're new, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Simon was talking about the sites being altered to reflect Trump's views. Here is an article that discusses, among other things, that very topic: https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news (https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news) (among others). It's not what I saw earlier, but it has much of the same info. It talks about how the stockpiles part of the site was altered, because of something Kushner said. Here's another: https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/ (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/). The Washington Post also had an article, but it seems to be behind a paywall for me. And another: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411 (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411).

I would hope that the serious medical info on the site would never be changed to reflect political views.

Yup. And while I haven't seen an article specific to the CDC doing this its worth considering that the now head of the CDC is a Trumpist with a history of claiming AIDS was gods punishment for gays and would almost certainly jump to it if told.

Also worth remembering the climate change data that other government websites have had to change or suppress if anyone is looking for precedent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 06:07:11 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 12, 2020, 05:24:39 PM
Just so you understand, Todd, despite his very intelligent posts in the music threads, is, in the Diner threads just a plain troll, sneering, snarking, attempting to annoy and provoke and display his superiority to the rest of us mortals.  He doesn't really want evidence, he just wants a response he can use as material for his trolling.He's been away from the forum for a few months, and now returned, and picked up immediately on his usual behavior. 
71 dB at least believes in what he says and wants to convince the rest of us of the truth.

indeed. It's kind of ironic, given GMG's origin history that he's shrunk into an extra nasty version of the Trump acolyte USA chauvinist troll that the first GMGers sought to flee (twenty years ago?) when they left places like RMCR and CMG, and he would feel right at home there now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 06:13:25 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 12, 2020, 05:49:36 PM
Ok, you're new, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Simon was talking about the sites being altered to reflect Trump's views. Here is an article that discusses, among other things, that very topic: https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news (https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/apr/04/change-follows-kushner-s-our-stockpile-/?news) (among others). It's not what I saw earlier, but it has much of the same info. It talks about how the stockpiles part of the site was altered, because of something Kushner said. Here's another: https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/ (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-after-kushner-remarks-national-stockpile-redefined/). The Washington Post also had an article, but it seems to be behind a paywall for me. And another: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411 (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kushner-stockpile-hhs-website-changed-echo-comments-federal/story?id=69936411).

I would hope that the serious medical info on the site would never be changed to reflect political views.

I read your response, which is both wrong and insulting. I have read this site for some time. I also read the Arkansas link. I am unconvinced. It's an opinion piece that implies, without actual proof, that a site was changed for political purposes. That's not proof. Doubly so since the article doesn't quote the CDC site itself as changing.
Together I think that has satisfied my need to engage with you.

Quote from: JBS on April 12, 2020, 05:53:36 PM
Ah, you see that's the difference. You actually want information. Todd doesn't.
Quick google brings this up as most pertinent to COVID19.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21161693/cdc-coronavirus-testing-numbers-website-disappear-expansion-us
.

Thank you for the link, and the polite and pertinent reply. Again, I didn't find that convincing. There are a lot of reasons to temporarily remove a number like that, including uncertainty about it. So, not proof.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 06:15:19 PM
Quote from: Todd on April 12, 2020, 06:09:54 PM

The very best a fourth rate fiction author can scribble.

Your'e just having a stir. You must be glad we're all willing to oblige.

Because you know I wasn't saying the CDC site has been altered. I was saying people may want to hear from Fauci directly because there's now a history of government sites being altered, even if that doesn't yet include that one.

Sigh...I'm sorry to learn that over the last couple of months the doctors weren't able to pull that stick out of your ass.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 06:18:32 PM
I wonder if this thread has a purpose. Several of you have referred to long standing animosities and feuds. They are evidently on display tonight.
As for me, my ignore list has grown again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 12, 2020, 06:32:39 PM
it is an amicable and international thread, with one easily ignored exception now
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 06:33:21 PM
BBC:

How the spread of coronavirus is testing Africa (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52230991)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 12, 2020, 06:50:42 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 12, 2020, 06:18:32 PM
I wonder if this thread has a purpose. Several of you have referred to long standing animosities and feuds. They are evidently on display tonight.
As for me, my ignore list has grown again.

No, you're misreading things.  It's just that Todd came back.  Todd is an asshole and has been for years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 09:04:21 PM
Paraguayans go hungry as coronavirus lockdown ravages livelihoods
Early, aggressive measures seem to be controlling the disease but the pandemic has laid bare the country's social inequalities (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/12/paraguay-coronavirus-hungry-social-inequalities)

"When Covid-19 arrived in South America, Paraguay was one of the first countries to take measures to contain the virus, closing schools and banning public gatherings after just the second confirmed case on 11 March.

The nationwide lockdown seems to be controlling the spread of the disease, but it has created another problem: large numbers of Paraguayans are going hungry in their own homes.

Paraguay has reported some of the lowest infection rates in South America – currently 129 confirmed cases and six deaths.

But the government of President Mario Abdo Benítez has been heavily criticised for failing to support people left without income during the total quarantine – which is now coming to the end of the third week and is set to continue until 19 April.

Sixty-five per cent of Paraguay's workers earn their living in the informal economy and have no access to benefits during the coronavirus crisis.

And while the government has been authorised to secure loans of $1.6bn to face the crisis, only a small part of a promised scheme of emergency payments of about $76 and food packs have reached those left in need. A further payment scheme is yet to be implemented."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 12, 2020, 09:20:02 PM
From Al Jazeera's 101 East series: "China: Truth In A Pandemic" (26 min.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjXR4o2EFYI
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 12, 2020, 11:54:41 PM
Quote from: Que on April 12, 2020, 09:56:56 AM
The total numbers, even in relation to the size of the total population, do not tell the real story about the effectiveness of the way an outbreak is handled... The sheer size of the total US population will blur out any (geographically concentrated) number of fatalities. The progression of the virus after initial contamination does give a more reliable picture:

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F4526c15a-7c38-11ea-82f6-150830b3b99a?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

Conclusion: the US isn't doing so swell. Although no Western country can be credited for responding  effectively....
I suspect that the bad US performance is mainly because its response was late, slow and uncoördinated. I could emphasise nature of the health care system, but since there is no real treatment I think that plays a secondary role to imposing social distancing.

Anyway, I'm  surprised you haven't celebrateted the demise of the power of federal government yet?
Since there seems ample reason to do so...

Q

The big difference between China and the rest is this. China quarantined whole cities where the virus had taken hold. Food and other essential services were taken care of by the uninfected population.

We can't do that. We have partially quarantined a large part of the population, but another large part is busy working still, with little protection.

I haven't seen any modelling for this. You have two transmission rates - a low one for 60% of the population, and a high one for 30%. It could be that we won't see a peak and then a falling off. Rather, we may see a high plateau.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on April 12, 2020, 11:55:42 PM
Quote from: DaveF on April 12, 2020, 08:42:03 AM
A great sadness to read of the death of veteran British comedian Tim Brooke-Taylor from the virus: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490).  Perhaps not an international star, but greatly loved at home.  I will make a pilgrimage to Mornington Crescent tube station at the earliest opportunity.

Love that idea  ;)... Will you be timely using 12 stations to get there ?  :P

Saw him with Osman, Hawks, Dee, and Jupp on the live Clue tour in January for my birthday present... What a night...He was hilarious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 13, 2020, 12:05:44 AM
Quote from: DaveF on April 12, 2020, 08:42:03 AM
A great sadness to read of the death of veteran British comedian Tim Brooke-Taylor from the virus: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52262490).  Perhaps not an international star, but greatly loved at home.  I will make a pilgrimage to Mornington Crescent tube station at the earliest opportunity.

Yes, I was sorry to hear that, he came over as a nice feller.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 13, 2020, 12:15:12 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 13, 2020, 12:05:44 AM
Yes, I was sorry to hear that, he came over as a nice feller.
Me too although, as a long standing Chelsea FC fan I was very sad to hear of the death of legendary goalkeeper Peter Bonetti - a hero of my youth and beyond, although his death was not due to the virus.

In terms of this thread I'm glad that Jeffrey (the other one) started it as it is such a big worry at the moment that I think that it's good to have an opportunity to express feelings, views etc. Not to have one might be a bit like ignoring 'the elephant in the room'. When my daughter was unwell I appreciated the supportive comments and enquiries here (she is fine now).

Today on the BBC News they announced that the mortality rate in the UK is 12% whereas in Germany it is 2%, which I find concerning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 13, 2020, 02:02:22 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 13, 2020, 12:15:12 AM
Today on the BBC News they announced that the mortality rate in the UK is 12% whereas in Germany it is 2%, which I find concerning.

These rates are highly unreliable since they are based on confirmed (tested) COVID-19 cases.
Unless you have nationwide tests of a representative portion of the population, like in Iceland, the total number of infections is anyone's guess.

The total number of fatalities related to the virus is unreliable as well: a significant number of people, mainly elderly, never make it to the hospital and die in nursing homes or their own home without ever being tested and reported. For example: the official death toll in the Netherlands is 1.766, but the Dutch Bureau of Statistics has already detected an unusual rise in deaths that coincides with the outbreak but is significantly higher.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 13, 2020, 02:15:17 AM
Quote from: Que on April 13, 2020, 02:02:22 AM
These rates are highly unreliable since they are based on confirmed (tested) COVID-19 cases.
Unless you have nationwide tests of a representative portion of the population, like in Iceland, the total number of infections is anyone's guess.

The total number of fatalities related to the virus is unreliable as well: a significant number of people, mainly elderly, never make it to the hospital and die in nursing homes or their own home without ever being tested and reported. For example: the official death toll in the Netherlands is 1.766, but the Dutch Bureau of Statistics has already detected an unusual rise in deaths that coincides with the outbreak but is significantly higher.

Q
Thanks for the clarification. Very helpful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on April 13, 2020, 05:03:49 AM
(https://scontent.fmxp5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/93873296_10218807846324460_4648677704164442112_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=0ETTTJPAQXUAX8pOE2P&_nc_ht=scontent.fmxp5-1.fna&oh=8997dd669a4cd041ba3a0ac4c971edb6&oe=5EB88839)

An interesting graph.
In Iceland they randomly tested a large number of people. In the Netherlands they tested those presenting symptoms only.
The virus seems to be among the younger people more than expected.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
A couple of things:

1) Regarding changing sites:  my first thoughts were that any changes would be due to changing information/updates/perhaps different ways of analyzing and/or reporting figures, etc.  And/or new information/thoughts as to how it is spreading, ways to treat it, how it is impacting different groups and so forth.  Maybe I'm being too trusting, but those are my thoughts for now....and too busy trying to find out helpful info/updates (including from my state) to read lots of articles about conspiracies personally.

2) Very sad news about tornadoes in Tennessee and Mississippi adding insult to injury.  The weather/storms which did the damage there are now moving east and up along the coast.  Warnings last night and today of significant rains with very strong winds could lead to power outages in many areas.  Suggested:  turn up (down really) your freezers and fridges now to be ready for possible outages.  Personally, I turned my stand-alone freezer to its coldest setting and also turned down the freezer in my refrigerator, but not the fridge itself as I don't want to freeze my fresh food!

3)  We're all really stressed out here and going through tough times (some, more so than others I suspect).  Please, please no name calling and snarky comments!  Let's try our best to be supportive of one another.  I know, not easy, but let's try. This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone!  I hope that I'm not alone in feeling this way here?

Best wishes to all,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 13, 2020, 05:29:32 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
A couple of things:

1) Regarding changing sites:  my first thoughts were that any changes would be due to changing information/updates/perhaps different ways of analyzing and/or reporting figures, etc.  And/or new information/thoughts as to how it is spreading, ways to treat it, how it is impacting different groups and so forth.  Maybe I'm being too trusting, but those are my thoughts for now....and too busy trying to find out helpful info/updates (including from my state) to read lots of articles about conspiracies personally.

2) Very sad news about tornadoes in Tennessee and Mississippi adding insult to injury.  The weather/storms which did the damage there are now moving east and up along the coast.  Warnings last night and today of significant rains with very strong winds could lead to power outages in many areas.  Suggested:  turn up (down really) your freezers and fridges now to be ready for possible outages.  Personally, I turned my stand-alone freezer to its coldest setting and also turned down the freezer in my refrigerator, but not the fridge itself as I don't want to freeze my fresh food!

3)  We're all really stressed out here and going through tough times (some, more so than others I suspect).  Please, please no name calling and snarky comments!  Let's try our best to be supportive of one another.  I know, not easy, but let's try. This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone!  I hope that I'm not alone in feeling this way here?

Best wishes to all,

PD

Cheers!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 13, 2020, 05:32:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
3)  We're all really stressed out here and going through tough times (some, more so than others I suspect).  Please, please no name calling and snarky comments!  Let's try our best to be supportive of one another.  I know, not easy, but let's try. This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone!  I hope that I'm not alone in feeling this way here?

Thanks, food for thought.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 13, 2020, 05:35:16 AM
Quote from: Que on April 13, 2020, 02:02:22 AM
These rates are highly unreliable since they are based on confirmed (tested) COVID-19 cases.
Unless you have nationwide tests of a representative portion of the population, like in Iceland, the total number of infections is anyone's guess.

The total number of fatalities related to the virus is unreliable as well: a significant number of people, mainly elderly, never make it to the hospital and die in nursing homes or their own home without ever being tested and reported. For example: the official death toll in the Netherlands is 1.766, but the Dutch Bureau of Statistics has already detected an unusual rise in deaths that coincides with the outbreak but is significantly higher.

Q

We will not know for at least a couple of years. The only reliable indication is the number of 'excess deaths' in a given year (2020) compared to a reference period.
When that analysis will have been completed in many different population groups (asian, european, american), useful data will emerge.

Check the curve for 2020 in Spain, where the spike is clearly attributable to the current pandemic:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Daily_mortality_in_Spain_April_2018%E2%80%93April_2020.png)

Graph from the wiki article on Mortality displacement:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_displacement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_displacement)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 13, 2020, 07:06:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
A couple of things:

1) Regarding changing sites:  my first thoughts were that any changes would be due to changing information/updates/perhaps different ways of analyzing and/or reporting figures, etc.  And/or new information/thoughts as to how it is spreading, ways to treat it, how it is impacting different groups and so forth.  Maybe I'm being too trusting, but those are my thoughts for now....and too busy trying to find out helpful info/updates (including from my state) to read lots of articles about conspiracies personally.

2) Very sad news about tornadoes in Tennessee and Mississippi adding insult to injury.  The weather/storms which did the damage there are now moving east and up along the coast.  Warnings last night and today of significant rains with very strong winds could lead to power outages in many areas.  Suggested:  turn up (down really) your freezers and fridges now to be ready for possible outages.  Personally, I turned my stand-alone freezer to its coldest setting and also turned down the freezer in my refrigerator, but not the fridge itself as I don't want to freeze my fresh food!

3)  We're all really stressed out here and going through tough times (some, more so than others I suspect).  Please, please no name calling and snarky comments!  Let's try our best to be supportive of one another.  I know, not easy, but let's try. This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone!  I hope that I'm not alone in feeling this way here?

Best wishes to all,

PD

As always a voice of reason. No place for Boris bashing or more importantly his lady friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 07:10:20 AM
Thanks, Irons.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 13, 2020, 08:19:31 AM
I really do not have the time to read every post so I do not know how others are doing.

My wife and I are in our early 70's .  We have hunkered down and only go out if we have to.

Just learned that a friend just succumbed to the virus.  He was about our age and in good health.  Apparently not good enough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 13, 2020, 08:34:10 AM
Would you volunteer to be tracked?

Coronavirus: UK confirms plan for its own contact tracing app

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52263244
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 13, 2020, 08:40:23 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on April 13, 2020, 08:19:31 AM
I really do not have the time to read every post so I do not know how others are doing.

My wife and I are in our early 70's .  We have hunkered down and only go out if we have to.

Just learned that a friend just succumbed to the virus.  He was about our age and in good health.  Apparently not good enough.

That's sad. Just hold on to each other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 13, 2020, 08:43:46 AM
I do feel grateful for you lot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 13, 2020, 08:50:12 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 13, 2020, 07:06:07 AM
As always a voice of reason. No place for Boris bashing or more importantly his lady friend.

Seconded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 08:52:36 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on April 13, 2020, 08:19:31 AM
I really do not have the time to read every post so I do not know how others are doing.

My wife and I are in our early 70's .  We have hunkered down and only go out if we have to.

Just learned that a friend just succumbed to the virus.  He was about our age and in good health.  Apparently not good enough.
So very sorry to hear that.  Condolences to both of you.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 13, 2020, 08:56:20 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 13, 2020, 08:34:10 AM
Would you volunteer to be tracked?

Coronavirus: UK confirms plan for its own contact tracing app

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52263244

Probably. Devil in the details of course.

I think we should pay people to self quarantine for extended periods. An online auction would find those able and willing to stay home at least cost. Reduce the density out there. It would involve monitoring.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 08:56:51 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 13, 2020, 08:43:46 AM
I do feel grateful for you lot.
+1  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 13, 2020, 09:15:58 AM
Get paid to be quarantined?

I'm going to be sooo rich! (Winning...)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 13, 2020, 10:11:30 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on April 13, 2020, 08:19:31 AM
I really do not have the time to read every post so I do not know how others are doing.

My wife and I are in our early 70's .  We have hunkered down and only go out if we have to.

Just learned that a friend just succumbed to the virus.  He was about our age and in good health.  Apparently not good enough.
Very sorry to hear that. Stay strong!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 13, 2020, 10:22:48 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 13, 2020, 10:11:30 AM
Very sorry to hear that. Stay strong!

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 13, 2020, 10:24:28 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 13, 2020, 10:11:30 AM
Very sorry to hear that. Stay strong!
+2.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 13, 2020, 10:54:41 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM

3)  We're all really stressed out here and going through tough times (some, more so than others I suspect).  Please, please no name calling and snarky comments!  Let's try our best to be supportive of one another.  I know, not easy, but let's try. This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone!  I hope that I'm not alone in feeling this way here?


Thanks!

Peter
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 13, 2020, 11:13:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 05:24:30 AM

This place should feel like a nice safe refuge and outlet and way to get through this together--not like a war zone! 

     "Oh hi, could you help me out, please? I appear to be lost. Could you tell me how to get to the war zone?"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 13, 2020, 12:27:38 PM
One thing not slowed down by the virus: internet scams

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-11/coronavirus-seiu-masks-fraud-fbi
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 13, 2020, 03:20:00 PM
Coronavirus conspiracy theories targeting Muslims spread in India
Attacks and boycotts escalate amid false claims that Muslim group to blame for epidemic (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/13/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories-targeting-muslims-spread-in-india)


Austria reopens some shops as lockdown eased (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52275959)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 13, 2020, 04:01:32 PM
Small chloroquine study stopped after irregular heart beats detected in subjects (https://thehill.com/policy/international/492460-small-chloroquine-study-stopped-after-irregular-heart-beats-detected-in)

"A small Brazilian study on the effects of the anti-malaria drug chloroquine, which is similar to the drug that  President Trump has touted as a possible "game changer" in treating the coronavirus, was abruptly halted because some patients taking high doses developed irregular heart rates generating "safety hazards."

The findings were revealed in a study funded by the Brazilian state of Amazonas and published on Saturday in medRxiv, an online server for medical articles, The New York Times first reported.

Chloroquine is similar to hydroxychloroquine, the drug Trump has repeatedly touted. Health experts have insisted that not enough is known about either drug to determine its efficacy in combating COVID-19.

The Brazilian study included 81 hospitalized patients, with about half being given a dose of 50 milligrams of chloroquine twice daily for five days. The other participants were prescribed a dose of 600 milligrams for 10 days.

Patients taking higher doses experienced heart arrhythmias, or improper beating of the heart, within three days, according to the study. Eleven patients died by the sixth day of treatment and caused the research on high-dosages to end.

"Preliminary findings suggest that the higher CQ dosage (10-day regimen) should not be recommended for COVID-19 treatment because of its potential safety hazards," the study's abstract said. "Such results forced us to prematurely halt patient recruitment to this arm."

The lower-dosage portion of the study did not include enough patients to gauge whether it is effective in treating severely ill patients, the Times noted. The researchers said that more studies assessing the efficacy of chloroquine are "urgently needed."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 13, 2020, 08:33:02 PM
Time magazine's cover story:

'Without Empathy, Nothing Works.' Chef José Andrés Wants to Feed the World Through the Pandemic (https://time.com/collection/apart-not-alone/5809169/jose-andres-coronavirus-food/)

(https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/TIME.Jose_.Final_.jpg?w=800&quality=85)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 13, 2020, 11:28:06 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 12, 2020, 09:27:16 AM
Loved him in At Last the 1948 Show.
Great to find another fan of the '1948' show. I even have a DVD of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 14, 2020, 12:46:46 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 13, 2020, 08:52:36 AM
So very sorry to hear that.  Condolences to both of you.

Best wishes,

PD

+ 3 sad to hear that news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 14, 2020, 12:55:25 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 14, 2020, 12:46:46 AM
+ 3 sad to hear that news.

+ 4.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 14, 2020, 02:55:15 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 13, 2020, 03:20:00 PM
Coronavirus conspiracy theories targeting Muslims spread in India
Attacks and boycotts escalate amid false claims that Muslim group to blame for epidemic (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/13/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories-targeting-muslims-spread-in-india)


Austria reopens some shops as lockdown eased (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52275959)
I heard about Austria this morning over the radio.  Will be quite interesting to see how that goes; fingers crossed for them!

Very sad to hear about India though.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 14, 2020, 03:17:45 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 13, 2020, 03:20:00 PM
Coronavirus conspiracy theories targeting Muslims spread in India
Attacks and boycotts escalate amid false claims that Muslim group to blame for epidemic (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/13/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories-targeting-muslims-spread-in-india)

Hindu populists have been targetting India's Muslim minority for years now.

It is at times like these that the seeds of discord germinate all over the world: nationalism, populism, bigotry - the nasty stufff...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 14, 2020, 03:46:33 AM
Some people are thinking forward:  https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/other/new-york-gov-cuomo-unveils-multistate-coalition-to-reopen-economy-after-coronavirus/ar-BB12AJMQ
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 14, 2020, 06:41:53 AM
Funny how the states on the East and West Coast almost seem to be peeling off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 14, 2020, 09:41:55 AM

     (https://i.imgur.com/IXgERww.png)

     All of these hard hit countries are now in the low single digits for new confirmed cases, 5% or less from the day before to yesterday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 14, 2020, 10:11:28 AM
There is some evidence that the novel coronavirus infects T-cells, similar to HIV, thwarting the immune response.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/04/more-bad-news-on-the-long-term-effects-of-the-coronavirus.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 14, 2020, 10:22:12 AM
Relevant to the discussion other users have brought up:

What the Racial Data Show (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-exposing-our-racial-divides/609526/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 14, 2020, 12:59:42 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 14, 2020, 06:41:53 AM
Funny how the states on the East and West Coast almost seem to be peeling off.
Huh?  I think that they're trying to do what the President has been unwilling and/or ineffective at doing (in my opinion):  provide leadership and direction and organization so as to avoid chaos, this time, upon re-opening.  They're trying to work regionally (at least from what I've heard in the East).  There are a lot of people, for instance, who work in NYC but live in New Jersey and Connecticut.  One of the things that Gov. Cuomo brought up was a concern that people would go traveling out of state if some things were open in other states but not in there own.  Gov. Cuomo was also asked this morning about whether or not he would welcome help from the President and he was all for it!  I think that it's a smart idea for the governors (and the teams) to come together to pool their smarts and ideas.  Perhaps other groups will form and can share info and experiences with each other?   :)  It's uncharted territory.

Don't know much about what is going on on the West Coast.  Hard to keep up with everything!

Distressed to read this article today:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52283658  I'm sure that that is true for many zoos in other countries too.  I also saw an article about some people in the Middle East abandoning their pets concerned that they could get Covid-19 from them. 
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-52234128/pets-in-middle-east-abandoned-over-coronavirus-fears

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 14, 2020, 01:04:42 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 14, 2020, 10:11:28 AM
There is some evidence that the novel coronavirus infects T-cells, similar to HIV, thwarting the immune response.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/04/more-bad-news-on-the-long-term-effects-of-the-coronavirus.html

I've read that doctors noted a high level of kidney failures, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 14, 2020, 02:19:28 PM
I've been able to avoid going out to shop, but just in case, I made a mask from a worn out t-shirt and rubberbands:

https://www.youtube.com/v/REtQwwRoxuY

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 14, 2020, 02:34:40 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 14, 2020, 06:41:53 AM
Funny how the states on the East and West Coast almost seem to be peeling off.
No, not at all. The primary responsibility, and attendant powers, rest with the states. These are contiguous states which obviously need to coordinate any changes in the lockdown. Looks like simple good leadership to me, from Cuomo and his neighbors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 14, 2020, 04:34:42 PM
Trump halts World Health Organization funding over coronavirus 'failure'
US president accuses group of promoting disinformation and says it 'must be held accountable' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/coronavirus-trump-halts-funding-to-world-health-organization)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mahlerian on April 14, 2020, 04:39:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 14, 2020, 04:34:42 PM
Trump halts World Health Organization funding over coronavirus 'failure'
US president accuses group of promoting disinformation and says it 'must be held accountable' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/coronavirus-trump-halts-funding-to-world-health-organization)

You wouldn't always be right if you accepted the opposite of whatever Trump says. But you'd be right more often than not, and I hope that leaders at the state level are able to make the decisions that keep their citizens safest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 14, 2020, 08:28:10 PM
World's shortest woman appeals to Indians to observe coronavirus lockdown
Jyoti Amge, 26, who is 62.8 cm tall, took to the streets of Nagpur to urge compliance (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/13/worlds-shortest-woman-appeals-to-indians-to-observe-coronavirus-lockdown)

(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/d26c19ba80d7fb27de66f1ed12d2ec217cbfc551/0_164_4928_2957/master/4928.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=28b64acc48a66fcfb3205ff303ab14c7)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 15, 2020, 12:32:32 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 14, 2020, 09:41:55 AM
     (https://i.imgur.com/IXgERww.png)

     All of these hard hit countries are now in the low single digits for new confirmed cases, 5% or less from the day before to yesterday.

Statistics are not always what they seem. The UK figures only include deaths in hospital beds. Deaths for example in Care Homes are not included which would add a further 10% to the total. France I understand includes all deaths.

It is astonishing comparing the reported cases and deaths between the UK and Germany.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 15, 2020, 12:51:21 AM
An interesting small broadcast here told about a local elite team of 15 people working with a possible vaccine.

It was said that on a global level, there are more than 40 such highly qualified teams, engaged in similar projects.


..................

Social distancing has worked surprisingly well here in Denmark, experts are surprised about the development compared to their predictions; now the question is to avoid a new big wave when opening society up a bit more. The pressure from business life and its political associates is mounting up for loosening regulations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 15, 2020, 01:06:51 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2020, 12:32:32 AMIt is astonishing comparing the reported cases and deaths between the UK and Germany.

Yet unsurprising, given how the NHS has been treated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 15, 2020, 01:16:35 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 15, 2020, 12:51:21 AM

Social distancing has worked surprisingly well here in Denmark, experts are surprised about the development compared to their predictions; now the question is to avoid a new big wave when opening society up a bit more. The pressure from business life and its political associates is mounting up for loosening regulations.

I noted, that Kåre Mølbak said the decline in admissions to hospitals largely was in the age group 60 - 79. Seems to indicate, that younger people are not equally careful as the vulnerable group. This is also consistent with my own impression.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on April 15, 2020, 03:18:25 AM
You also have to take into account that in a country like Germany the Easter weekend was a holiday weekend; there will not be as many tests done as on a normal workday. It seems better to wait a few more days and then thake the trend of the last 7-10 days. In any case it seems that Germany will mostly wait until early May to lift some restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 15, 2020, 03:23:46 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on April 15, 2020, 03:18:25 AM
You also have to take into account that in a country like Germany the Easter weekend was a holiday weekend; there will not be as many tests done as on a normal workday. It seems better to wait a few more days and then thake the trend of the last 7-10 days. In any case it seems that Germany will mostly wait until early May to lift some restrictions.

Testing has been less widespread in Denmark, though they are working on it. But statistics regarding hospitalizations, ICUs and fatalities are updated daily here, from what I know.
Delays are very apparent in Sweden too, where numbers sky-rocketed yesterday & are supposed to do it today as well, following Easter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Wanderer on April 15, 2020, 03:31:36 AM
How Greece is beating coronavirus despite a decade of debt (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/how-greece-is-beating-coronavirus-despite-a-decade-of-debt)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 06:44:28 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2020, 12:32:32 AM
Statistics are not always what they seem. The UK figures only include deaths in hospital beds. Deaths for example in Care Homes are not included which would add a further 10% to the total. France I understand includes all deaths.

It is astonishing comparing the reported cases and deaths between the UK and Germany.

     I'm following the trend in new confirmed cases and the daily death reports. The trends are visible regardless of the differences in how countries test or count deaths. It's not the absolute numbers that concern me, it's what the trends show.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 15, 2020, 07:15:01 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 15, 2020, 01:06:51 AM
Yet unsurprising, given how the NHS has been treated.

Explain?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 07:27:34 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2020, 12:32:32 AM
Statistics are not always what they seem. The UK figures only include deaths in hospital beds. Deaths for example in Care Homes are not included which would add a further 10% to the total. France I understand includes all deaths.

It is astonishing comparing the reported cases and deaths between the UK and Germany.
The first thing I noticed was the disparity between the German send UK statistics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 15, 2020, 07:28:33 AM
I thought that this was a heartwarming story:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-52290976 (The one about Capt. Moore).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 08:34:25 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 07:27:34 AM
The first thing I noticed was the disparity between the German send UK statistics.

     Some reasons for this are discussed in a failing article in the NYTimes (or is it an article......oh never mind):

The average age of those infected is lower in Germany than in many other countries. Many of the early patients caught the virus in Austrian and Italian ski resorts and were relatively young and healthy, Professor Kräusslich said.

"It started as an epidemic of skiers," he said.

As infections have spread, more older people have been hit and the death rate, only 0.2 percent two weeks ago, has risen, too. But the average age of contracting the disease remains relatively low, at 49. In France, it is 62.5 and in Italy 62, according to their latest national reports.

Another explanation for the low fatality rate is that Germany has been testing far more people than most nations. That means it catches more people with few or no symptoms, increasing the number of known cases, but not the number of fatalities.



     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 08:41:44 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 15, 2020, 07:28:33 AM
I thought that this was a heartwarming story:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-52290976 (The one about Capt. Moore).

Yes, lovely. It featured in the government's TV briefing today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 08:43:16 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 08:34:25 AM
     Some reasons for this are discussed in a failing article in the NYTimes (or is it an article......oh never mind):

The average age of those infected is lower in Germany than in many other countries. Many of the early patients caught the virus in Austrian and Italian ski resorts and were relatively young and healthy, Professor Kräusslich said.

"It started as an epidemic of skiers," he said.

As infections have spread, more older people have been hit and the death rate, only 0.2 percent two weeks ago, has risen, too. But the average age of contracting the disease remains relatively low, at 49. In France, it is 62.5 and in Italy 62, according to their latest national reports.

Another explanation for the low fatality rate is that Germany has been testing far more people than most nations. That means it catches more people with few or no symptoms, increasing the number of known cases, but not the number of fatalities.



   
Thanks. Your last point rings true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 15, 2020, 08:46:18 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 15, 2020, 03:31:36 AM
How Greece is beating coronavirus despite a decade of debt (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/how-greece-is-beating-coronavirus-despite-a-decade-of-debt)

A great achievement after so much economic hardship! Chapeau to Greece.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 15, 2020, 08:47:56 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2020, 07:15:01 AMExplain?

This is a good primer: 11 charts on the problems facing the NHS (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50290033)

Also:

The five-year financial settlement for the NHS provides much needed investment but is not enough to meet key waiting times standards and transform services for patients (https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/positions/nhs-funding)

Spending Round: major challenges remain for health, social care and wider public services (https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/news/spending-round-major-challenges-remain-for-health)

We can't clap away destructive NHS cuts – no matter how much we profess to love our carers (https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/nhs-clap-carers-cuts-coronavirus-boris-johnson-chopra-a9430251.html)

Not to mention the effects of Brexit (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/perspective/brexit-eu-doctors-consider-leaving-nhs.aspx)..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 15, 2020, 09:24:48 AM
A treatise on masks
https://www.noonecoming.com/masks-respirators-and-covid19/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 15, 2020, 10:10:00 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 07:27:34 AM
The first thing I noticed was the disparity between the German send UK statistics.

It must be down to testing. That I think is the key.

Jeffrey, did you see the story of Captain Tom Moore who aged 99, a ton at the end of this month, bet £100 for the NHS with his family, that with the aid of his Zimmer frame he would do a hundred laps of his garden. So far he has raised £8 1/2 million and rising! A hero twice over, and a top man!

Edit : I missed that PD has raised a link above.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 15, 2020, 10:25:11 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 15, 2020, 08:47:56 AM
This is a good primer: 11 charts on the problems facing the NHS (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50290033)

Also:

The five-year financial settlement for the NHS provides much needed investment but is not enough to meet key waiting times standards and transform services for patients (https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/positions/nhs-funding)

Spending Round: major challenges remain for health, social care and wider public services (https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/news/spending-round-major-challenges-remain-for-health)

We can't clap away destructive NHS cuts – no matter how much we profess to love our carers (https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/nhs-clap-carers-cuts-coronavirus-boris-johnson-chopra-a9430251.html)

Not to mention the effects of Brexit (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/perspective/brexit-eu-doctors-consider-leaving-nhs.aspx)..

Fair enough, it is a view, but to address some balance I think it should be pointed out that the NHS is the world's fifth biggest employer and the biggest employer in Europe. After all this I think there is a chance the NHS will overtake McDonalds and be fourth biggest! Anyway you are entitled to your views even if I think they are misplaced.

Nothing is black or white, perfect or not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 10:46:53 AM

     Why a study showing that covid-19 is everywhere is good news (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0zsc2zdoGncJ:https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/04/11/why-a-study-showing-that-covid-19-is-everywhere-is-good-news+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

     Yes, and if it's as everywhere as the article surmises, the true fatality rate is much lower. It makes sense, since so little testing has been done of people who aren't sick or who had symptoms so mild they didn't even call their doctors, or weren't even sure they were having symptoms. I sometimes wonder if I'm "coming down with something" and an hour later I forget all about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 15, 2020, 12:15:00 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 15, 2020, 09:24:48 AM
A treatise on masks
https://www.noonecoming.com/masks-respirators-and-covid19/
The author sure does use a lot of words.

My basic issue with masks, based on the studies that I have read, is that their use confers little to no protection to a healthy person. The reason we wear them, from what I understood,  is 1) Prevent an unhealthy person from breathing all over and 2) Prevent people from being stigmatized when they do wear masks (psychological).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 12:30:08 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 15, 2020, 12:15:00 PM
The author sure does use a lot of words.

My basic issue with masks, based on the studies that I have read, is that their use confers little to no protection to a healthy person. The reason we wear them, from what I understood,  is 1) Prevent an unhealthy person from breathing all over and 2) Prevent people from being stigmatized when they do wear masks (psychological).

     I don't see that as an issue with masks. I'm happy if the only masks that protect are the ones spreaders are wearing, and if wearing a mask makes it more likely spreaders will wear one too, I'm OK with it. I also have to consider that I'm a spreader. Who says I'm not? I think I'd better wear one.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 15, 2020, 01:02:10 PM
South Korea votes in first national election of coronavirus era (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/south-korea-votes-in-first-national-election-of-coronavirus-era)

"Running for high office in the midst of a pandemic has forced candidates in South Korea to abandon tried and tested campaigning methods, as the country prepares to become the first to hold a national election since the start of the coronavirus outbreak.

With a few exceptions, they have swapped handshakes for elbow bumps and delivered speeches from behind masks to small groups rather than hold mass rallies. Kissing babies is out of the question.

In less tumultuous times, the 15 April elections would have been dominated by job creation, wages and North Korea's nuclear weapons programme. But they have been overshadowed by president Moon Jae-in's response to the pandemic.

Early indications are that the virus has failed to deter voters, with predictions of a record turnout by the time all the votes for the 300-seat national assembly have been cast on Wednesday evening. On Friday, more than 5 million people cast their ballots early – a record high since advance voting was introduced seven years ago."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 15, 2020, 01:12:46 PM
https://www.businessinsider.com/fisher-island-richest-zip-code-coronavirus-antibody-tests-2020-4

I first heard this story on CNBC, and even their reporters and anchors were put off by it. One even mentioned that a lot of these tests were still unreliable, and said it in a tone of voice that implied she hoped Fisher Island was wasting money on the tests.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 06:58:01 PM

     Here's a feasible timeline for US reopening:

     (https://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/timeline.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 10:09:14 PM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2020, 10:10:00 AM
It must be down to testing. That I think is the key.

Jeffrey, did you see the story of Captain Tom Moore who aged 99, a ton at the end of this month, bet £100 for the NHS with his family, that with the aid of his Zimmer frame he would do a hundred laps of his garden. So far he has raised £8 1/2 million and rising! A hero twice over, and a top man!

Edit : I missed that PD has raised a link above.
Yes, I think you're right about the testing Lol.
Yes, the Captain's story is very heartwarming. I was moved to make a small contribution to his fund yesterday. Nice to have some good news. I see that Matt Hancock mentioned him in his TV briefing yesterday and rightly so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 16, 2020, 12:28:26 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 15, 2020, 10:09:14 PM
Yes, I think you're right about the testing Lol.
Yes, the Captain's story is very heartwarming. I was moved to make a small contribution to his fund yesterday. Nice to have some good news. I see that Matt Hancock mentioned him in his TV briefing yesterday and rightly so.

Talk of a knighthood for him. Hancock I have always thought slightly strange but he has performed well over the crises, until today that is. Piers Morgan asked him some relevant questions on the gradual lifting of restrictions which he refused to answer, instead repeating the mantra,"stay at home.........". The most disturbing part of the interview was him freely admitting "only" 16,000 fly into the UK each day including from the current epicentre of the virus, New York, without testing of any form!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 12:39:38 AM
Coronavirus: Armed Michigan residents protest against stay-at-home order calling it 'tyranny'


https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-armed-michigan-residents-protest-against-stay-at-home-order-calling-it-tyranny-11973905?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter&awc=11005_1587026289_d9fb309c5e9ab53241774fd026a5b78a
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 12:43:04 AM
First sign of a rift between government and medical advisors in the UK

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/apr/16/coronavirus-uk-live-news-covid-19-lockdown-extension?page=with:block-5e9800a88f08ea7431f43be7#block-5e9800a88f08ea7431f43be7


QuoteI'm reminded by the fact we had a Department for Brexit for government - that was a major national emergency, as it were - and we're faced with something which is, at the moment, even larger than Brexit and yet I don't see quite the same evidence for that level of organisation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 01:38:20 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVlAHF3XgAECbsP?format=jpg&name=900x900)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 16, 2020, 01:48:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 12:39:38 AM
Coronavirus: Armed Michigan residents protest against stay-at-home order calling it 'tyranny'


OMG, long time ago I used to live in SE Michigan, for five years, and loved it. But there is a kooky white guy brand of Michigan men, who like to fantasize about living commando and acting as if there's an imminent civil war.

I used to wonder if it would've different if the Upper Peninsula was Canadian, 'cause toughing it out in the wild there has been an abiding fantasy since the days of Hemingway's Big Two-Hearted River.

Part of this is, of course, the conflict Trump has been creating with Whitmer because she's a undowdy woman. Women in power is a very hard thing to take for these men.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 16, 2020, 02:51:23 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 16, 2020, 12:28:26 AM
Talk of a knighthood for him. Hancock I have always thought slightly strange but he has performed well over the crises, until today that is. Piers Morgan asked him some relevant questions on the gradual lifting of restrictions which he refused to answer, instead repeating the mantra,"stay at home.........". The most disturbing part of the interview was him freely admitting "only" 16,000 fly into the UK each day including from the current epicentre of the virus, New York, without testing of any form!
Yes, the mantra is very irritating now and possibly less efficacious the more it is repeated - a case of 'less is more' I think. It is also used as a way of avoiding answering questions directly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 03:18:40 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 16, 2020, 12:28:26 AM
Talk of a knighthood for him. Hancock I have always thought slightly strange but he has performed well over the crises, until today that is. Piers Morgan asked him some relevant questions on the gradual lifting of restrictions which he refused to answer, instead repeating the mantra,"stay at home.........". The most disturbing part of the interview was him freely admitting "only" 16,000 fly into the UK each day including from the current epicentre of the virus, New York, without testing of any form!
I thought that it was pretty cool that donations were coming from all over the world.   :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 16, 2020, 03:44:07 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 06:58:01 PM
     Here's a feasible timeline for US reopening:

     (https://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/timeline.png)

Thx
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 16, 2020, 05:09:50 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 15, 2020, 06:58:01 PM
     Here's a feasible timeline for US reopening:

I noticed that the 2nd wave is projected before the general availability of a vaccine.
Which is realistic but worrisome...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 05:23:08 AM
Quote from: Que on April 16, 2020, 05:09:50 AM
I noticed that the 2nd wave is projected before the general availability of a vaccine.
Which is realistic but worrisome...

Q


I suppose everyone wants to be rid of lockdown for obvious economic reasons, despite the cost in lives. How to nuance that, how to decide how much of lockdown to cut, how many lives to sacrifice to the economy, is a difficult question.

I wonder if this debate will be aired in public.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 16, 2020, 05:45:56 AM
Ed Yong's follow-up article:

Our Pandemic Summer: The fight against the coronavirus won't be over when the U.S. reopens. Here's how the nation must prepare itself (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/04/pandemic-summer-coronavirus-reopening-back-normal/609940/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 16, 2020, 06:11:29 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 05:23:08 AM

I suppose everyone wants to be rid of lockdown for obvious economic reasons, despite the cost in lives. How to nuance that, how to decide how much of lockdown to cut, how many lives to sacrifice to the economy, is a difficult question.

I wonder if this debate will be aired in public.

The usual answer to this question given by experts in many countries is, that if we are to open the society up again  - and even if only a little, the vulnerable part of the population has got to accept a high degree of self-quarantine until a usable vaccine or efficient cure has been developed. And equally long time we all have to observe continued social distancing, hand-washing et. c. , and this will save many lives. But opening up more or less before a cure or vaccine has been found will all the same cost a number of lives also among younger age groups. I do not think anyone will be able to quantify this - or will want to. In Denmark we have opened up a little, and next step will be taken, when we in 3 -4 weeks see the early effect of this opening.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 16, 2020, 07:09:45 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 16, 2020, 02:51:23 AM
Yes, the mantra is very irritating now and possibly less efficacious the more it is repeated - a case of 'less is more' I think. It is also used as a way of avoiding answering questions directly.

Exactly, Jeffrey. I take exception being spoken to by a politician half my age as if I am a child.
Do not get me wrong, everyone connected to the NHS is doing a fantastic job, it is a war and they are the front line and I will be standing on my doorstep clapping this evening at their heroic efforts. But the media needs to get a grip, to sentimentalise their work is to downgrade it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 16, 2020, 07:17:20 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 03:18:40 AM
I thought that it was pretty cool that donations were coming from all over the world.   :)

More then cool, P.

He now has company on his circuits.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 16, 2020, 07:23:14 AM
Yes, that's happening in many places.

Apart from the real ravages this pandemic is generating (on health and the economy), it's given free rein to all sorts of cheap sentimentality and even kitsch (the untranslatable Spanish word "cursilería").  I really can't stand all those football players singing from home, third-tier celebrities posting pictures of the banana bread they've just baked, or sharing their workout routine from their backyards, as if any of this had any interest beyond their closest circle of friends and family, and were in any way alleviating the situation for the wider population. But even in dire times like these, the unbridled narcissism of this era gets the upper hand...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 16, 2020, 07:34:30 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 16, 2020, 07:17:20 AM
More then cool, P.

He now has company on his circuits.

Yes, a well deserved Guard of Honour - how great!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 07:38:59 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 16, 2020, 06:11:29 AM
The usual answer to this question given by experts in many countries is, that if we are to open the society up again  - and even if only a little, the vulnerable part of the population has got to accept a high degree of self-quarantine until a usable vaccine or efficient cure has been developed. And equally long time we all have to observe continued social distancing, hand-washing et. c. , and this will save many lives. But opening up more or less before a cure or vaccine has been found will all the same cost a number of lives also among younger age groups. I do not think anyone will be able to quantify this - or will want to. In Denmark we have opened up a little, and next step will be taken, when we in 3 -4 weeks see the early effect of this opening.

This is reasonable I think, if we're talking about people who don't have to work. The problem is that some of those vulnerable people may not in fact have the choice about risking their lives, because they have to pay the bills at the end of the month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 16, 2020, 07:54:33 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 16, 2020, 06:11:29 AM
The usual answer to this question given by experts in many countries is, that if we are to open the society up again  - and even if only a little, the vulnerable part of the population has got to accept a high degree of self-quarantine until a usable vaccine or efficient cure has been developed. And equally long time we all have to observe continued social distancing, hand-washing et. c. , and this will save many lives. But opening up more or less before a cure or vaccine has been found will all the same cost a number of lives also among younger age groups. I do not think anyone will be able to quantify this - or will want to. In Denmark we have opened up a little, and next step will be taken, when we in 3 -4 weeks see the early effect of this opening.

The development of a vaccine is the universal criteria for going back to normal, and the time frame 18-24 months is frequently mentioned. But there is no guarantee that an effective vaccine will ever be found. There is still no effective vaccine for HIV.

I have seen some preliminary reports that the Covid-19 virus invades T cells and causes apoptosis (cell death), although it doesn't reproduce in them. T-cells are one of the main mechanisms that the immune system maintains long term memory, and this could limit immunity to the novel coronavirus to a few months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 08:11:43 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 16, 2020, 07:54:33 AM
The development of a vaccine is the universal criteria for going back to normal,

Or a drug to prevent or at least ameliorate the second phase.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 16, 2020, 08:39:10 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 08:11:43 AM
Or a drug to prevent or at least ameliorate the second phase.

Anti-viral treatments are more difficult to find than vaccines. I think the backstop is holding isolation until the numbers go down enough to do traditional contact tracing (public health workers calling people on the phone, mapping contacts, with the authority to order people into quarantine. Aided by newfangled cellphone contact tracing data based on bluetooth. The rule of thumb is that one contact tracer is required for every 4 active cases. With 20% unemployment coming to the US, it shouldn't be hard to find them. Training them is another matter.

That's how SARS and MERS were eliminated. Trouble is the new SARS is apparently more efficient at transmitting itself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 16, 2020, 08:49:55 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 16, 2020, 07:54:33 AM


I have seen some preliminary reports that the Covid-19 virus invades T cells and causes apoptosis (cell death), although it doesn't reproduce in them. T-cells are one of the main mechanisms that the immune system maintains long term memory, and this could limit immunity to the novel coronavirus to a few months.


     I found this from 2000:

     NIAID Researchers Discover Why Some HIV-Infected People Don't Develop AIDS (https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/news/520/niaid-researchers-discover-why-some-hiv-infected-people-dont-develop-aids)

Scientists have noticed connections between other HLA types and HIV disease progression in the past, but this is the first study to identify such an overwhelming correlation. "Some associations between HLA genes and disease resistance could be phenomena in which HLA isn't the key but is simply located near another important gene," explains Dr. Connors. "The functional studies included in our research indicate that this molecule is likely directly involved in restricting virus replication in this small subgroup of people."

     So, what's rare for HIV cases may be quite common for Covid-19. Much of the population may be LTNP (long term non-progressors).

     

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 16, 2020, 09:02:32 AM
There was a great New Yorker article that seemed to indicate that scientists are more looking for an antiviral medicine that could tackle more than one corona virus, sine the expectation is that there will be another one coming down the pike.

But no doubt there are other folks who are looking hard for a vaccine.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/04/13/the-quest-for-a-pandemic-pill
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 16, 2020, 10:25:49 AM
More on vaccines  https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/15/coronavirus-vaccine-prospects (https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/15/coronavirus-vaccine-prospects)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 10:31:21 AM
Really well done explanation of the problem of infection rate by Angela Merkel.


https://twitter.com/benjalvarez1/status/1250563198081740800?s=21
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 10:31:32 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 16, 2020, 06:11:29 AM
The usual answer to this question given by experts in many countries is, that if we are to open the society up again  - and even if only a little, the vulnerable part of the population has got to accept a high degree of self-quarantine until a usable vaccine or efficient cure has been developed. And equally long time we all have to observe continued social distancing, hand-washing et. c. , and this will save many lives. But opening up more or less before a cure or vaccine has been found will all the same cost a number of lives also among younger age groups. I do not think anyone will be able to quantify this - or will want to. In Denmark we have opened up a little, and next step will be taken, when we in 3 -4 weeks see the early effect of this opening.
Premont, in what has has the society/businesses/life opened up so far; as in, what are they now allowing?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 10:36:24 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 16, 2020, 07:17:20 AM
More then cool, P.

He now has company on his circuits.
I saw that on the BBC website this morning!   :)  So nice that he is being recognized and honored by everyone!   ;D

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 16, 2020, 10:39:31 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 16, 2020, 10:25:49 AM
More on vaccines  https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/15/coronavirus-vaccine-prospects (https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/15/coronavirus-vaccine-prospects)


Interesting and informative, also as regards vocabulary etc.

I certainly don't claim to understand many details, but he seems however less informed about say the European angles, or those overseas elsewhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 16, 2020, 10:42:59 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 10:31:32 AM
Premont, in what has has the society/businesses/life opened up so far; as in, what are they now allowing?

PD

They are hoping for a general political agreement in a few hours, besides the smaller steps that have just been implemented these days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 10:43:58 AM
Thanks MT; will be quite interested to see what they propose!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 16, 2020, 11:06:13 AM
It is hard to keep up with every post because of the heavy activity here.

One of the problems we have in the United States is that there is a conservative Pro-Trump news network, Fox News.  Most of the Pro-Trump people in the United States only listen to Fox News.

Fox has been pushing forth the Trump message that he is not to blame for anything and this crises is the fault of the Chinese and the World Health Organization.

The network is also is broadcasting the idea that we need to accept people dying in order to keep the economy going.  As a result in many areas of the United States, primarily Pro-Trump areas, there have be protest over the measures that some states have taken to try to contain the virus.  One state is South Dakota.  The governor there, a Trump supporter, has refused to take any actions to contain the virus.  She claims that they have everything under control.  When one takes in account the population of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, about 180,000, their rate of infection is worse than New York City.  No matter how many people die, they have to keep the Walmart Department Store open. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 11:10:18 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on April 16, 2020, 11:06:13 AM
Fox has been pushing forth the Trump message that he is not to blame for anything and this crises is the fault of the Chinese and the World Health Organization.



In that he's getting some moral support from the UK and France

https://www.europe1.fr/international/coronavirus-en-chine-pour-emmanuel-macron-des-choses-se-sont-passees-quon-ne-sait-pas-3962437

Coronavirus en Chine : pour Emmanuel Macron, "des choses se sont passées qu'on ne sait pas"


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8226967/Dominic-Raab-warns-China-faces-hard-questions-source-coronavirus-pandemic.html

It WON'T be 'business as usual' with China after coronavirus crisis is over, warns Dominc Raab as he calls for 'hard questions' for the Communist state over secrecy and spread of virus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 16, 2020, 11:15:05 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 10:31:32 AM
Premont, in what has has the society/businesses/life opened up so far; as in, what are they now allowing?

PD

First and foremost children care and schools from first to fifth class opened yesterday. The argument is, that children stand the virus better than grown-up's (even if it is unknown if they also are less contagious). Of course lots of hygienical precautions must be taken as to distance, hand-washing and other things to prevent too much virus spreading among the children and the pedagogues. Another effect of opening in this way, which the PM has stressed is, that it allows many parents to begin working again, not having to take care of the children all day. To make this work it is presupposed, that all Danes continue the general measures (social distancing et. c.).

There is a great political pressure on our government also to allow small shops (hairdressers e.g.) to open now. This is as far as I know not decided until now, but they are negotiating about it.

I do not think more will be opened, until we know if these openings allows the virus to spread too much, or if the spread is acceptable. But it will spread the virus somewhat, more people will contract the virus, and more will die, and unfortunately it is a political question, how many more deaths are acceptable. And as Mandryka wrote above, there will be no public information or discussion of this issue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 11:16:40 AM
Only the British of a certain age will understand why this is slightly funny.


(https://i.ibb.co/0KL3H22/nice-2-metre.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 16, 2020, 11:41:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 11:10:18 AM
In that he's getting some moral support from the UK and France

Of course he is getting some moral support from the UK and France.  I know that.  The populations of France and the UK are over 60,000,000 for each country.  I would be stunned if at least a few million in each county thought Trump walked on water.  So what?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 16, 2020, 12:13:25 PM
It seems to boil down to this:
Chinese regional authorities were dishonest with the national government and tried to minimize the virus's effects.  Then Chinese national authorities seem to have been dishonest with the rest of the world. And WHO  passed on that information uncritically.

The only questions are how much, at any of these three levels, was this because of bureaucratic ineptitude and how much knowing but not caring. Team Trump of course claims maximal malice from Beijing and the WHO, and that WHO willingly carries water for China. The actual facts presumably come much closer to bureaucratic ineptitude.

Being angry at WHO of course allows Trump to shift the blame for the fact that he too accepted the Chinese information uncritically and therefore took no steps to prepare for the pandemic reaching the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 16, 2020, 12:23:49 PM
Yes, so it seems. But two wrongs do not make a right. China and (probably to a lesser degree) are in no way  beyond reproach—one would be naive to expect any transparency from a totalitarian regime like the Chinese—, but finger pointing and scapegoating aren't going to solve anything right now.

Some Fox News commentator I caught while zapping said it was natural to punish the WHO for doing a lousy job. That train of thought would then be applicable to the man who holds the highest office in the US, and who publicly declined to "take any responsibility" just some weeks ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 16, 2020, 12:23:50 PM
(Dutchnews.nl)
Half a million people may have developed coronavirus antibodies

As many as 3% of people in the Netherlands may have developed antibodies against coronavirus, indicating they have some immunity against Covid-19, the public health institute RIVM said on Thursday. Blood bank operator Sanquin arrived at the figure after studying blood and plasma samples from around 7,000 donors aged between 18 and 69 during a one-week period. If the 3% figure is reflected in the general population, as many as half a million people may have developed antibodies.

Jaap van Dissel, the RIVM's head of infectious disease control, stressed that the presence of antibodies did not guarantee that a person was immune. The research into immunity is ongoing and has not yet been published in a peer reviewed journal, he told MPs during the weekly technical briefing.

++++++++++

The figure might go up the coming weeks, but it is not as high as I expected.....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 16, 2020, 12:27:04 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 16, 2020, 12:23:49 PM
Yes, so it seems. But two wrongs do not make a right. China and (probably to a lesser degree) are in no way  beyond reproach—one would be naive to expect any transparency from a totalitarian regime like the Chinese—, but finger pointing and scapegoating aren't going to solve anything right now.

Some Fox News commentator I caught while zapping said it was natural to punish the WHO for doing a lousy job. That train of thought would then be applicable to the man who holds the highest office in the US, and who publicly declined to "take any responsibility" just some weeks ago.

And who repeatedly claimed before then that everything was under control.  Trump is obviously scapegoating.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on April 16, 2020, 12:35:23 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 16, 2020, 12:13:25 PM
It seems to boil down to this:
Chinese regional authorities were dishonest with the national government and tried to minimize the virus's effects.  Then Chinese national authorities seem to have been dishonest with the rest of the world. And WHO  passed on that information uncritically.

The only questions are how much, at any of these three levels, was this because of bureaucratic ineptitude and how much knowing but not caring. Team Trump of course claims maximal malice from Beijing and the WHO, and that WHO willingly carries water for China. The actual facts presumably come much closer to bureaucratic ineptitude.

Being angry at WHO of course allows Trump to shift the blame for the fact that he too accepted the Chinese information uncritically and therefore took no steps to prepare for the pandemic reaching the US.


The Trump administration cut the CDC staff in the Bejing office from 47 to 14, the number including epidemiologists. Sounds like a source of inside information recklessly discarded:   

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-cdc-exclusiv/exclusive-u-s-slashed-cdc-staff-inside-china-prior-to-coronavirus-outbreak-idUSKBN21C3N5

In any case, the warnings were multiple and loud despite Chinese misinformation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 16, 2020, 01:12:48 PM
Early peek at data on Gilead coronavirus drug suggests patients are responding to treatment

A Chicago hospital treating severe Covid-19 patients with Gilead Sciences' antiviral medicine remdesivir in a closely watched clinical trial is seeing rapid recoveries in fever and respiratory symptoms, with nearly all patients discharged in less than a week, STAT has learned.

Remdesivir was one of the first medicines identified as having the potential to impact SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes Covid-19, in lab tests. The entire world has been waiting for results from Gilead's clinical trials, and positive results would likely lead to fast approvals by the Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies. If safe and effective, it could become the first approved treatment against the disease.

The University of Chicago Medicine recruited 125 people with Covid-19 into Gilead's two Phase 3 clinical trials. Of those people, 113 had severe disease. All the patients have been treated with daily infusions of remdesivir.

"The best news is that most of our patients have already been discharged, which is great. We've only had two patients perish," said Kathleen Mullane, the University of Chicago infectious disease specialist overseeing the remdesivir studies for the hospital.

Her comments were made this week during a video discussion about the trial results with other University of Chicago faculty members. The discussion was recorded and STAT obtained a copy of the video.

The outcomes offer only a snapshot of remdesivir's effectiveness. The same trials are being run concurrently at other institutions, and it's impossible to determine the full study results with any certainty. Still, no other clinical data from the Gilead studies have been released to date, and excitement is high. Last month, President Donald Trump touted the potential for remdesivir — as he has for many still-unproven treatments — and said it "seems to have a very good result."

In a statement Thursday, Gilead said: "What we can say at this stage is that we look forward to data from ongoing studies becoming available."

Gilead had said to expect results for its trial involving severe cases in April. Mullane said during her presentation that data for the first 400 patients in the study would be "locked" by Gilead Thursday, meaning that results could come any day.

Mullane, while encouraged by the University of Chicago data, made clear her own hesitancy about drawing too many conclusions.

"It's always hard," she said, because the severe trial doesn't include a placebo group for comparison. "But certainly when we start [the] drug, we see fever curves falling," she said. "Fever is now not a requirement for people to go on trial, we do see when patients do come in with high fevers, they do [reduce] quite quickly. We have seen people come off ventilators a day after starting therapy. So, in that realm, overall our patients have done very well."

She added: "Most of our patients are severe and most of them are leaving at six days, so that tells us duration of therapy doesn't have to be 10 days. We have very few that went out to 10 days, maybe three," she said.

Reached by STAT, Mullane confirmed the authenticity of the footage but declined to comment further.

Asked about the data, Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, described them as "encouraging."

"The severely hit patients are at such high-risk of fatality. So if it's true that many of the 113 patients were in this category and were discharged, it's another positive signal that the drug has efficacy," he said, adding that it will be important to see more data from randomized controlled studies.

Gilead's severe Covid-19 study includes 2,400 participants from 152 different clinical trial sites all over the world. Its moderate Covid-19 study includes 1,600 patients in 169 different centers, also all over the world.

The trial is investigating five- and 10-day treatment courses of remdesivir. The primary goal is a statistical comparison of patient improvement between the two treatment arms. Improvement is measured using a seven-point numerical scale that encompasses death (at worst) and discharge from hospital (best outcome), with various degrees of supplemental oxygen and intubation in between.

The lack of a control arm in the study could make interpreting the results more challenging.

A lack of data has led to yo-yoing expectations for the drug. Two studies in China had enrollment suspended partway through because there were not enough patients available. A recent report of patients given the drug under a special program to make it available to those who are very ill generated both excitement and skepticism.

In scientific terms, all the data are anecdotal until the full trial reads out, meaning that they should not be used to draw final conclusions. But some of the anecdotes are dramatic.

Slawomir Michalak, a 57-year-old factory worker from a suburb west of Chicago, was among the participants in the Chicago study. One of his daughters started feeling ill in late March and was later diagnosed with mild Covid-19. Michalak, by contrast, came down with a high fever and reported shortness of breath and severe pain in his back.

"It felt like someone was punching me in the lungs," he told STAT.

At his wife's urging, Michalak went to the University of Chicago Medicine hospital on Friday, April 3. His fever had spiked to 104 and he was struggling to breath. At the hospital, he was given supplemental oxygen. He also agreed to participate in Gilead's severe Covid-19 clinical trial.

His first infusion of remdesivir was on Saturday, April 4. "My fever dropped almost immediately and I started to feel better," he said.

By his second dose on Sunday, Michalak said he was being weaned off oxygen. He received two more daily infusions of remdesivir and recovered enough to be discharged from the hospital on Tuesday, April 7.

"Remdesivir was a miracle," he said.

The world is waiting to find out if it is really so.

About the Authors

Adam Feuerstein
Senior Writer, Biotech

Adam is STAT's national biotech columnist, reporting on the intersection of biotech and Wall Street.


Matthew Herper
Senior Writer, Medicine

Matthew covers medical innovation — both its promise and its perils.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 16, 2020, 01:16:10 PM
R.I. "best estimate" shows COVID-19 peak on May 3, with 2,100 deaths through October

Governor Gina M. Raimondo says if social distancing rules are not followed, the peak could come April 27 with 4,000 deaths through October
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 16, 2020, 02:37:59 PM
Slate Star Codex  https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/04/14/a-failure-but-not-of-prediction/ (https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/04/14/a-failure-but-not-of-prediction/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 02:40:17 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 16, 2020, 11:15:05 AM
First and foremost children care and schools from first to fifth class opened yesterday. The argument is, that children stand the virus better than grown-up's (even if it is unknown if they also are less contagious). Of course lots of hygienical precautions must be taken as to distance, hand-washing and other things to prevent too much virus spreading among the children and the pedagogues. Another effect of opening in this way, which the PM has stressed is, that it allows many parents to begin working again, not having to take care of the children all day. To make this work it is presupposed, that all Danes continue the general measures (social distancing et. c.).

There is a great political pressure on our government also to allow small shops (hairdressers e.g.) to open now. This is as far as I know not decided until now, but they are negotiating about it.

I do not think more will be opened, until we know if these openings allows the virus to spread too much, or if the spread is acceptable. But it will spread the virus somewhat, more people will contract the virus, and more will die, and unfortunately it is a political question, how many more deaths are acceptable. And as Mandryka wrote above, there will be no public information or discussion of this issue.
Wow!  I heard something recently on the news (I think that it was about kids being able to see their friends??) that kids (young ones anyway) will do what they would naturally do, not thinking about distancing, and go up to and hug their friends that they haven't seen in some time....which is a totally natural reaction.  I do wish you all the best and am hoping so hard that things don't 'go south' for your wonderful country and people.  It just seems way too early to me.   :(

So hard to watch the news these days; more job losses and pictures on the news of huge, long lines of people trying to get food help across the country....more job losses, Congress's plan to help people and businesses out has run out of money (unless they vote to fund more).  Have to check out Pres. Trump's latest plans just announced.

All the best to you and please keep us up to date,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 03:09:30 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 16, 2020, 12:23:49 PM
Yes, so it seems. But two wrongs do not make a right. China and (probably to a lesser degree) are in no way  beyond reproach—one would be naive to expect any transparency from a totalitarian regime like the Chinese—, but finger pointing and scapegoating aren't going to solve anything right now.

Some Fox News commentator I caught while zapping said it was natural to punish the WHO for doing a lousy job. That train of thought would then be applicable to the man who holds the highest office in the US, and who publicly declined to "take any responsibility" just some weeks ago.
From what I recall (story this morning) re NPR story, the WHO is really an advisory part of the UN and it doesn't have the legal ability to go into a country to inspect things without their request...basically can only say that they are willing to help and give advice and offer to go in, etc., but if the said country says no, that's that.  So, it's not right to blame the WHO for doing a bad job when they can only do so much.  Am trying to find the story.  Here's the interview with Kelly Craft:  https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/04/15/835485122/u-n-ambassador-says-inaction-by-who-china-would-be-unforgiveable  trying to find the response that I heard today with an interview by an authority on the WHO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 16, 2020, 03:16:04 PM
Our PM has announced that if - if - we go down from level 4 to level 3 for a further two weeks at the end of our four week lock down it will look like this:

Covid 19 coronavirus: What alert level 3 and other levels mean for you (https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12325179)

[...]

"BUSINESSES AND WORKPLACES

Work from home if you can, is the message from Ardern to employers.

Where that is not possible, businesses may reopen but must comply with health and safety requirements around physical distancing and contactless engagement with customers.

Businesses only accessed by the staff, and without a customer-facing function, such as building and construction or forestry can open under strict health and safety and physical distancing rules.

Businesses that are accessed by the public or customers such as retail, hardware stores and restaurants can open but only for online or phone purchases and contactless delivery or click and collect.

SOCIAL DISTANCING

Keep your bubble but you can expand it "a small amount" at level 3, Ardern said.

People must stay within their immediate household bubble, but can expand this to reconnect with close family / whānau, or bring in caregivers, or support isolated people.

This extended bubble should remain exclusive.

Sticking to existing bubbles is recommended but some expansion is allowed if, for example, you have a caregiver that you need, children in shared care, a defacto partner who is caring for others, or you're a single person who wants the company of a sibling for example. Keep it exclusive and keep it small.

Funerals and weddings will be able to go ahead, but limited to 10 people. But they can only be services. No meals, food or receptions can take place.

Public venues are closed (eg, libraries, museums, cinemas, food courts, gyms, pools, playgrounds, markets).

SCHOOLS

Early childhood education centres and schools will open for children up to and including Year 10, with appropriate public health measures in place. All young people in Years 11-13 will continue to learn at home.

Physical attendance at school is voluntary, but all children not at school should be learning by distance.

Schools will be a safe place for children to go to learn if their parents need to return to work, or the children cannot learn at a distance.

Children who are able to, should remain home and learn via distance.

Children at school would be kept in the same groups each day and it would be down to each school to work out how to do that, Ardern said.

Schools and ECEs will contact parents as they work through their plans for reopening.

Home-based early learning services can resume up to the maximum number of licensed children of four including the educator's own children, provided public health requirements are met.

Play centres and play groups will be closed.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) like gloves and masks are not necessary for a school environment. Children, young people and staff who are at greater risk are encouraged to stay at home. Any child, young person or staff member who is sick should remain at home.

It will take at least a week for schools and early childhood centres to get ready to open after we go to alert Level 3.

New Zealand's biggest university will run all courses remotely until Semester 2 starts in July - regardless of the Covid-19 alert level - fearing moving in and out of different alert levels will be too disruptive.

University of Auckland vice-chancellor Professor Dawn Freshwater told students last Thursday this would remain the case in alert level 3 or even in the unlikely event New Zealand moved quickly to alert level 2.

RECREATION

You can do activities that are local, which you can do safely, and which do not involve interacting with other people, or equipment touched by other people.

You should go to your nearest beach or park, not your favourite one.

Boating and jetskis are still banned because they can be prone to breakdown.

But you can swim, surf, and fish from the shore.

But don't start a new activity that you haven't done before.

If there are signs of congregation, this rule will be reconsidered so Kiwis shouldn't consider it a time to catch-up with all their swimming buddies, Ardern said.

Staying overnight at a bach or holiday home is not permitted.

Public play equipment would remain closed.

HEALTHCARE

Healthcare services should use virtual, non-contact consultations where possible.

People at high risk of severe illness (older people and those with existing medical conditions) are encouraged to stay at home where possible, and take additional precautions when leaving home. They may choose to work.

Primary care will continue to be open, Allied Health and dentists will open.

TRAVEL

Travel restrictions remain but move from local to regional.

This recognises that more people will travel to work, or to take children to school. But to avoid taking potential Covid-19 cases to other parts of the country, restricting movement to what is necessary remains the goal.

Inter-regional travel is highly limited (for example for essential workers, with limited exemptions for others).

If you were in the wrong place when the restrictions came into place, and need to get home, you can now move throughout New Zealand to do so. You can only move once, and in one direction. New Zealanders can move to or from the Cook Islands, Niue, and Tokelau once, and in one direction."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 16, 2020, 03:22:55 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 03:09:30 PM
From what I recall (story this morning) re NPR story, the WHO is really an advisory part of the UN and it doesn't have the legal ability to go into a country to inspect things without their request...basically can only say that they are willing to help and give advice and offer to go in, etc., but if the said country says no, that's that.  So, it's not right to blame the WHO for doing a bad job when they can only do so much.  Am trying to find the story.  Here's the interview with Kelly Craft:  https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/04/15/835485122/u-n-ambassador-says-inaction-by-who-china-would-be-unforgiveable  trying to find the response that I heard today with an interview by an authority on the WHO.

Trump could also have demanded a change of leadership at the top or the firing of those who made mistakes, rather than jumping to defunding them in the middle of a pandemic

..if, that is, they were actually guilty of what he accuses them of.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 16, 2020, 04:22:19 PM

     W.H.O., Now Trump's Scapegoat, Warned About Coronavirus Early and Often (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/health/WHO-Trump-coronavirus.html)

      This is what should be understood about the early mistakes by the WHO and the Chinese government:

A crucial turning point in the pandemic came on Jan. 20, after China's central government sent the country's most famous epidemiologist, Zhong Nanshan, to Wuhan to investigate the new coronavirus racing through that city of 11 million people. Dr. Zhong delivered a startling message on national television: Local officials had covered up the seriousness of the outbreak, the contagion spread quickly between people, doctors were dying and everyone should avoid the city.

Dr. Zhong, an eccentric 83-year-old who led the fight against the SARS outbreak of 2002 and 2003, was one of few people in China with enough standing to effectively call Wuhan's mayor, Zhou Xianwang, a rising official in the Communist Party, a liar.

Mr. Zhou, eager to see no disruption in his plans for a local party congress from Jan. 11 to 17 and a potluck dinner for 40,000 families on Jan. 18, appears to have had his police and local health officials close the seafood market, threaten doctors and assure the public that there was little or no transmission.

Less than three days after Dr. Zhong's warning was broadcast, China locked down the city, preventing anyone from entering or leaving and imposing strict rules on movement within it — conditions it would later extend far behind Wuhan, encompassing tens of millions of people.

The national government reacted in force, punishing local officials, declaring that anyone who hid the epidemic would be "forever nailed to history's pillar of shame," and deploying tens of thousands of soldiers, medical workers and contact tracers.

It was the day of the lockdown that the W.H.O. at first declined to declare a global emergency, its officials split and expressing concern about identifying a particular country as a threat, and about the impact of such a declaration on people in China. Such caution is a standard — if often frustrating — fact of life for United Nations agencies, which operate by consensus and have usually avoided even a hint of criticizing nations directly.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 16, 2020, 05:13:45 PM
Zhou Xianwang is still mayor of Wuhan, though
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 17, 2020, 04:53:23 AM
Belarus crowdfunds to fight coronavirus as leader denies it exists (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/17/belarus-crowdfunds-to-fight-coronavirus-as-leader-denies-it-exists)

"The healthcare system in Belarus is being propped up by volunteers and crowdfunding campaigns as the country grapples with a coronavirus pandemic its president has been hesitant to admit exists.

Belarus has attracted international headlines for its delayed response, continuing to host Europe's only active football league, as the president, Alexander Lukashenko, dismissed the pandemic as a "psychosis".

"No one in the country will die from coronavirus," Lukashenko declared publicly earlier this week.

Meanwhile, a human rights activist and volunteer worker, Andrej Stryzhak, has cofounded the #bycovid19 group to crowdfund, acquire and deliver equipment and protective clothing to medics and other frontline personnel, one of many local initiatives by NGOs and businesses.

"Our goal is to make sure this system doesn't collapse," he said. "In many places, for instance in Vitebsk [a city in north-east Belarus], we see that there's a very difficult situation, a critical situation. There are a lot of sick people, and a lot of medics are sick."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 06:22:09 AM
Vets would not manage Covid-19 this way

https://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/186/14/462.full

QuoteIf there is anything fortunate in this ghastly experience, it is that most of the vulnerable can be readily identified, protected and kept out of the intensive care units; they are generally not the economic generators within the population. The young, fit, slim, non-smokers could be left to get on with creating the wealth that we are going to need to secure our futures, instead of being locked away waiting for the inevitable
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 06:33:18 AM
Quote from: Que on April 16, 2020, 12:23:50 PM
(Dutchnews.nl)
Half a million people may have developed coronavirus antibodies

As many as 3% of people in the Netherlands may have developed antibodies against coronavirus, indicating they have some immunity against Covid-19, the public health institute RIVM said on Thursday. Blood bank operator Sanquin arrived at the figure after studying blood and plasma samples from around 7,000 donors aged between 18 and 69 during a one-week period. If the 3% figure is reflected in the general population, as many as half a million people may have developed antibodies.

Jaap van Dissel, the RIVM's head of infectious disease control, stressed that the presence of antibodies did not guarantee that a person was immune. The research into immunity is ongoing and has not yet been published in a peer reviewed journal, he told MPs during the weekly technical briefing.

++++++++++

The figure might go up the coming weeks, but it is not as high as I expected.....

Q

This came up in parliament today

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8229009/Britain-faces-TEN-waves-coronavirus-population-achieves-herd-immunity.html

Britain could suffer 40,000 deaths in first coronavirus outbreak and may be hit by up to TEN waves of the infection before the population achieves herd immunity, former World Health Organisation official warns MPs


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 17, 2020, 07:03:46 AM
According to Dansk Statistik, an official organ, there haven't been more deaths in Denmark since the first corona-death in the country 3.14.2020 than usual for the period.

Report in Danish:

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-04-17-corona-ser-ikke-ud-til-at-give-flere-doedsfald-end-normalt
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 17, 2020, 07:21:21 AM
1)
Quote from: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 06:33:18 AM
This came up in parliament today

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8229009/Britain-faces-TEN-waves-coronavirus-population-achieves-herd-immunity.html

Britain could suffer 40,000 deaths in first coronavirus outbreak and may be hit by up to TEN waves of the infection before the population achieves herd immunity, former World Health Organisation official warns MPs

It's difficult to establish certainties these days, as a layman; at the same time, there's the controversial leading Swedish official/scientist Tegnell, promoting their herd immunity strategy, says that glimpses of immunity among the population of Stockholm can now be seen, and that this goal will probably be reached in May
link in Swedish https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/coronaviruset/senaste-nytt-om-corona-i-sverige-folj-presstraffen/

Not all Swedish experts agree on this, however.

2)
Reports about the Chicago study and the curing effects of Remdesivir on the virus can be read in many media now; about 113 patients received the drug, and almost all of them could leave the hospital in less than a week (at least, that's how the story goes). Remdesivir was also used against Ebola. It is being tested at two Swedish hospitals as well, among 100 patients with varying degrees of sickness, and in Danish hospitals too.
link in Swedish https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/3JbbPd/lovande-signaler-om-ebolamedicin-mot-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 07:27:12 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 17, 2020, 07:03:46 AM
According to Dansk Statistik, an official organ, there haven't been more deaths in Denmark since the first corona-death in the country 3.14.2020 than usual for the period.

Report in Danish:

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-04-17-corona-ser-ikke-ud-til-at-give-flere-doedsfald-end-normalt

Yes I've come across this before, presumably due to less road traffic accidents and less deaths from other infectious deceases due to social distancing, hand washing etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 07:49:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 07:27:12 AM
Yes I've come across this before, presumably due to less road traffic accidents and less deaths from other infectious deceases due to social distancing, hand washing etc.
Starting before the virus got too bad. In Italy, Spain, New York the virus was far enough advanced to kill more than those measures saved.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 17, 2020, 07:53:08 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2020, 02:40:17 PM
Wow!  I heard something recently on the news (I think that it was about kids being able to see their friends??) that kids (young ones anyway) will do what they would naturally do, not thinking about distancing, and go up to and hug their friends that they haven't seen in some time....which is a totally natural reaction.  I do wish you all the best and am hoping so hard that things don't 'go south' for your wonderful country and people.  It just seems way too early to me.   :(
(...)

All the best to you and please keep us up to date,
PD

I'll update on the situation in Denmark, though I know it is of limited interest to many.
Still the news might be symptomatic for a development, where the number of sick people is going down, at least for a period.

The opening up may be rolled back, if results coming in about 10 days from now show a major increase in infections etc.

1) yes, the opening of institutions for minors is very much debated here, and there has been some confusion. In reality, it seems that the current capacity at institutions is only half the normal one. Some parents in particular are against it, and there are dilemmas, such as whether children from homes with people in the risk group should join too; "no", it is now being said from the authorities. Likewise, the gatherings should take place in the open air as much as possible (we have some outdoor kindergartens already, so there is some routine in this) and social distancing and hygiene should be practised as much as possible.

Scientists seem to overall agree that this is about as gentle an opening one can get, for a start. But obviously, dealing with the children will in reality imply a lot of compromises and chaos, and be stressful for the pedagogues. There are suggestions that parents should be also paid for taking care of their children at home in stead, if possible.

2) as regards the newer initiative of opening up even further, yesterday evening's agreement was rather modest. Some smaller businesses are allowed to open, but should take special precautions. They include hairdressers and tattoo shops, driving schools, opticians, various therapists, spa-workers, and dentists.

3) Denmark hasn't had much capacity for testing, but it is working on increasing it. It was a part of yesterday's agreement, that a better mapping through testing should be implemented, including massive tests of health workers and other employees in important societal functions, for a start. A big series of tests for 20,000 hospital workers has just shown that the amount of virus was not above average among them, which is comforting: only 4 %. An earlier test among blood donors showed 3 %.

4) public transport: buses and trains should be running on a more normal basis from next week, as regards the schedules. But there are various regulations and recommendations promoting social distancing and a limited amount of passengers.

5) court procedures have largely been suspended, but will open again in late April.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 07:57:52 AM
Thanks for the update!   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 17, 2020, 09:46:23 AM
The quest for the origin of the virus continues...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/coronavirus-outbreak-may-have-started-as-early-as-september-scientists-say/ar-BB12MPqU?ocid=msedgntp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 17, 2020, 10:50:28 AM
Looks like we'll find out in 2-3 weeks how successful one of the drugs being tested is against the virus:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/remdesivir-covid-19-patients-recovering-quickly-after-getting-experimental-drug/ar-BB12KGlu?ocid=msedgntp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 17, 2020, 01:11:59 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 12:51:24 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/52qy1xcT/2020-0416-quarantine-protest-2048x1316.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Protest against Michigan (USA) Governor Gretchen Whitmer's stay-at-home order.  Notice protestor with rifle.  The protest (another scheduled for next Wednesday) was organized by a Republican "shadow group" funded by the family of Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos.  The wealthy DeVos family controls the Michigan Republican Party.  Governor Whitmer is a Democrat.

I live in Michigan and despise the DeVos's, who made their fortune through a pyramid scheme, still active.

According to my Facebook stream, that was the better behaved group. Apparently there were others who effectively barricaded the ER entrance to Sparrow Hospital,  keeping out patients, ambulances, doctors, and other staff.

And Trump sends out tweets cheering these people on, although they're actually protesting the guidelines his administration issued yesterday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 01:54:43 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 17, 2020, 01:11:59 PM
According to my Facebook stream, that was the better behaved group. Apparently there were others who effectively barricaded the ER entrance to Sparrow Hospital,  keeping out patients, ambulances, doctors, and other staff.

And Trump sends out tweets cheering these people on, although they're actually protesting the guidelines his administration issued yesterday.

Who 'did' and are the posters of this news trustworthy?  I'd like to think that this couldn't/wouldn't happen, but in these days and times, who knows?!  And, if so, where were the police?  And if true, were they arrested?  I honestly can't imagine people blocking the access to an ER; besides the virus and its possibly lethal effects, what if, for example, someone had had a heart attack...or a stroke...or something else that was life-threatening?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 01:58:54 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 17, 2020, 01:11:59 PM
According to my Facebook stream, that was the better behaved group. Apparently there were others who effectively barricaded the ER entrance to Sparrow Hospital,  keeping out patients, ambulances, doctors, and other staff.

And Trump sends out tweets cheering these people on, although they're actually protesting the guidelines his administration issued yesterday.
The organizers wanted everyone to stay in their vehicles. That would have been an effective protest against the over reach of her lockdown order, but getting out, mingling, no distance, just shows how many of them have no clue. And no clue about PR either. I am sympathetic to their goal (her order is extreme and confusing), but have zero sympathy for this kind of thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 02:02:25 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 01:58:54 PM
The organizers wanted everyone to stay in their vehicles. That would have been an effective protest against the over reach of her lockdown order, but getting out, mingling, no distance, just shows how many of them have no clue. And no clue about PR either. I am sympathetic to their goal (her order is extreme and confusing), but have zero sympathy for this kind of thing.
Hi Kaga2,

Just curious as to what your sources and/or news were re the organizers?  Just trying to understand everything.... :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 02:06:29 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 02:02:25 PM
Hi Kaga2,

Just curious as to what your sources and/or news were re the organizers?  Just trying to understand everything.... :(
In the report I read it said organizers tried to get people to stay in their vehicles. All I can recall. It makes sense though. A disciplined, restrained protest always makes an impression. Thousands of cars, no disruptions, then they leave — that's what I'd want if I tried to organize such a thing.

I didn't see hospital pictures, so I am skeptical about that. But this kind of irresponsible foolishness, we have pictures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 02:11:14 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 02:06:29 PM
In the report I read it said organizers tried to get people to stay in their vehicles. All I can recall. It makes sense though. A disciplined, restrained protest always makes an impression. Thousands of cars, no disruptions, then they leave — that's what I'd want if I tried to organize such a thing.

I didn't see hospital pictures, so I am skeptical about that. But this kind of irresponsible foolishness, we have pictures.
Hi, thanks for responding.

What was the report that you had read?  I do care about info and where it came from and also things like was that person actually there (think history and sources).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 02:15:39 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 02:11:14 PM
Hi, thanks for responding.

What was the report that you had read?  I do care about info and where it came from and also things like was that person actually there (think history and sources).
I don't recall which report I am afraid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2020, 02:33:51 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 02:15:39 PM
I don't recall which report I am afraid.
Think a bit (and I do mean this honestly and politely .....do check your sources...it really does matter...it's not easy to figure out...I do understand that).

Best to you,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 03:10:07 PM
More photos from Michigan protest:

(https://i.postimg.cc/Bn13Z9hT/Michigan-protesters-honk-against-coronavirus-order.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

(https://i.postimg.cc/6qwVqXLy/aptopix-virus-outbreak-michigan-dawn-perreca-protests-front-steps-of-michigan-capitol-building-640x3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Idiot can't spell "Whitmer".

Boston Globe article as good as any:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/chanting-e2-80-98lock-her-up-e2-80-99-michigan-protesters-in-maga-hats-demonstrated-against-whitmer-e2-80-99s-coronavirus-restrictions/ar-BB12JlnL


Regarding the blocked ambulance:

https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/2020/04/16/sparrow-lansing-fire-department-no-ambulances-issues-during-protest/5145522002/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 17, 2020, 03:14:35 PM

     (https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/04/17/world/17virus-int-briefing-denmark/merlin_171667458_da0f3e9a-2c21-476f-bf79-79b1f1a61ba3-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp)

     Children at Logumkloster District School in Denmark at their desks, at least two yards apart, on Thursday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 17, 2020, 03:26:01 PM
From Reason Magazine, a more detailed critique of Whitmer's order.
https://reason.com/2020/04/16/michigan-gov-gretchen-whitmer-provides-a-lesson-in-what-states-shouldnt-do-to-stop-a-pandemic/

It's not sympathetic to Whitmer, but it's not too keen on the guys with guns either.

QuoteMeanwhile, Operation Gridlock, which was mounted by the Michigan Conservative Coalition inviting motorists to drive to Lansing, the state's capital, and shut down its roads, elicited a massive response Wednesday. Thousands of Michigan residents heeded the call and created an hours-long traffic snarl.

Although the motorists adhered to the social distancing rules as they were advised, the protest also brought out a lot of nasty gun-toting thugs onto the streets. Michigan Proud Boys, a supremacist outfit, blocked the intersection around a hospital. Not only did they ignore safety guidelines, exposing themselves and others to the virus just when Michigan was beginning to flatten the curve, they also waved Confederate flags and chanted "lock her up."

I italicized the reference to the hospital blockade.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 17, 2020, 04:00:18 PM
I went now to link that Facebook post I referred to earlier, but it's not available now. The original poster either made it private or totally deleted it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 17, 2020, 04:15:40 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/52qy1xcT/2020-0416-quarantine-protest-2048x1316.jpg)

Is it legal to hold guns while you're protesting in Michigan?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 17, 2020, 04:21:14 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 17, 2020, 04:15:40 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/52qy1xcT/2020-0416-quarantine-protest-2048x1316.jpg)

Is it legal to hold guns while you're protesting in Michigan?

Quite possibly probably yes. I'd have to look into the laws of Michigan to know for sure.

But it's quite possible that guns are forbidden in proximity to the state Capital.  Again, it would be a matter of Michigan law.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 17, 2020, 05:21:27 PM
A good idea to avoid corona virus , is not just was you're hands don't touch you're face, what about a warm bath in the morning and a second whit ocean big salt, it kill microbes. Simple two bath a day if you have to work, I don't but use this routine?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 17, 2020, 05:25:28 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 17, 2020, 03:26:01 PM
From Reason Magazine, a more detailed critique of Whitmer's order.
https://reason.com/2020/04/16/michigan-gov-gretchen-whitmer-provides-a-lesson-in-what-states-shouldnt-do-to-stop-a-pandemic/

It's not sympathetic to Whitmer, but it's not too keen on the guys with guns either.


Good link. That sounds like the right attitude.
I did see one guy with a confederate flag with a rifle image superimposed on it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 07:18:29 PM
[quote
Is it legal to hold guns while you're protesting in Michigan?
[/quote]

Michigan is an "open cary" state; so the general answer is, "yes."  Places where guns are prohibited (without a concealed pistol permit) include banks, churches, courts, day care centers, hospitals, colleges, and elementary schools.  However, off-premises carry would likely be legal.  Gun advocates like to wave firearms in front of elementary schools, saying they are there to "protect the children."  Michigan is not that unusual in its gun laws.  We have a neighbor who likes to walk his dog up and down our street, a pistol strapped to his (the neighbor's, not the dog's) hip.  No idea what he is afraid of.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on April 17, 2020, 07:39:48 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 07:18:29 PM
Michigan is not that unusual in its gun laws.  We have a neighbor who likes to walk his dog up and down our street, a pistol strapped to his (the neighbor's, not the dog's) hip.  No idea what he is afraid of.

Probably not afraid of anything per se. He wants something to happen so he can draw his weapon and be the "hero."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 17, 2020, 07:49:07 PM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 17, 2020, 07:39:48 PM
Probably not afraid of anything per se. He wants something to happen so he can draw his weapon and be the "hero."

Possibly. There are a certain percentage of gun owners who seem to think the probability of getting mugged is like the probability of gettin a flat tire. It doesn't happen every day, but it happens.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 08:07:50 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 17, 2020, 03:14:35 PM
     (https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/04/17/world/17virus-int-briefing-denmark/merlin_171667458_da0f3e9a-2c21-476f-bf79-79b1f1a61ba3-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp)

     Children at Logumkloster District School in Denmark at their desks, at least two yards apart, on Thursday.

What do they do in the playground? How many kids in a classroom? Can you fit a full class in the room like that? Do they eat their lunch 2m apart? Can they stay 2m apart in narrow school corridors?  Do adults have the protective equipment to allow them to go closer to the children?

What's the point of keeping them apart anyway? I thought that kids are asymptomatic and their role in the transmission process is unknown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 17, 2020, 08:12:41 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 07:18:29 PM
[quote
Is it legal to hold guns while you're protesting in Michigan?


Michigan is an "open cary" state; so the general answer is, "yes."  Places where guns are prohibited (without a concealed pistol permit) include banks, churches, courts, day care centers, hospitals, colleges, and elementary schools.  However, off-premises carry would likely be legal.  Gun advocates like to wave firearms in front of elementary schools, saying they are there to "protect the children."  Michigan is not that unusual in its gun laws.  We have a neighbor who likes to walk his dog up and down our street, a pistol strapped to his (the neighbor's, not the dog's) hip.  No idea what he is afraid of.

Okay. But some of the guys in that photo have clearly gone beyond a hip holster for a pistol and seem to be holding m16s or similar. Is that still covered by "open carry"? Can you really just walk down main street with an assault rifle if you feel like it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 17, 2020, 08:55:18 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 08:07:50 PM
What do they do in the playground? How many kids in a classroom? Can you fit a full class in the room like that? Do they eat their lunch 2m apart? Can they stay 2m apart in narrow school corridors?  Do adults have the protective equipment to allow them to go closer to the children?

What's the point of keeping them apart anyway? I thought that kids are asymptomatic and their role in the transmission process is unknown.

I think a few infants / kids are also known to have been sick.
The opening is just for kids up to the 5th grade.

The stuff on their tables are lunch boxes, and no, pedagogues/teachers will not be wearing protective gear.

Traditionally, there's quite a lot of self independence in our school system. However, this is an exceptional situation. A set of regulations was just issued: https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2020/Corona/Genaabning/Skoler/Instruks-til-personale-paa-skoler-og-i-fritidsordninger.ashx?la=da&hash=307C5EE8A144B25C204E25E628EDFC9A6B5E6F2B

It tells of quite a lot of measures. Preferably 2 m zone, lots of cleaning and hygiene, children playing only in groups of 2 to 5, alternating breaks reducing the number of kids for each break, kids preferably being outdoors the whole day, general avoidance of physical contact also among pupils, professional meetings between staff preferably outdoor, by phone or virtual, children only using the same class room, no sharing of food, etc.

But overall, in reality the regulations will work only on a certain and limited level, obviously with flaws.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 11:02:56 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 17, 2020, 08:12:41 PM
Okay. But some of the guys in that photo have clearly gone beyond a hip holster for a pistol and seem to be holding m16s or similar. Is that still covered by "open carry"? Can you really just walk down main street with an assault rifle if you feel like it?

This may only answer your question indirectly; but if the rifles were not carried legally, the police would definitely have intervened-- the demonstrators were on the steps of the state capitol for chrissake.  If a firearm is registered, it can be carried in public so long as the carrier isn't "brandishing" it or using it to threaten someone.  The U.S. is a gun culture.  I gave up fretting about it long ago.  I actually prefer open carry:  I can see who has a gun.  It's some nut with a concealed firearms permit I worry about.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2020, 11:52:59 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 17, 2020, 03:26:01 PM
From Reason Magazine, a more detailed critique of Whitmer's order.
https://reason.com/2020/04/16/michigan-gov-gretchen-whitmer-provides-a-lesson-in-what-states-shouldnt-do-to-stop-a-pandemic/


A picture is worth a thousand words.

(https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q80/uploads/2020/04/zumaamericastwentyseven251597-1200x675.jpg)

Even without social distancing I wouldn't want to be in the proximity of this woman. Eating alive anybody she doesn't like is written all over her countenance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 17, 2020, 11:54:23 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 17, 2020, 01:11:59 PM
And Trump sends out tweets cheering these people on, although they're actually protesting the guidelines his administration issued yesterday.

c'mon, that was yesterday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:00:10 AM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 17, 2020, 07:39:48 PM
Probably not afraid of anything per se. He wants something to happen so he can draw his weapon and be the "hero."

They never do. In a scenario where "something" would happen (a dog stick up, for instance) that armed neighbour would accidentally misfire and shoot some other neighbour.

Like I said, I used to live in Ann Arbor in the early nineties, but I am SO GLAD I don't live in the US anymore.

I know in the larger picture these are just marginal incidents, but let's face it, there's a fascist in the White House, and it remains to be seen if he's willing to pack it in come Jan 2021.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:04:28 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 17, 2020, 11:52:59 PM
A picture is worth a thousand words.

Even without social distancing I wouldn't want to be in the proximity of this woman. Eating alive anybody she doesn't like is written all over her countenance.

well, Florestan, since you live in Rumania, chances are you'll never get close, so that was just some gratuitous misogyny.

Whitmer is really a very nice person, for a politician, and she's obviously under great stress now. Obviously, aoart from trying to save people in her state, she's showered with death threats, just like anyone who's excited Trump's ire, and thank you for adding yourself to the mix, even though US politics is a 100% none of your business.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 12:07:20 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:04:28 AM
well, Florestan, since you live in Rumania, chances are you'll never get close, so that was just some gratuitous misogyny.

Whitmer is really a very nice person, for a politician, and she's obviously under great stress now. Obviously, aoart from trying to save people in her state, she's showered with death threats, just like anyone who's excited Trump's ire, and thank you for adding yourself to the mix, even though US politics is a 100% none of your business.

So my comment is a death threat to her? You know what, your avatar and signature line fits you perfectly. Probably the only self-awareness moment you ever had.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 18, 2020, 12:14:14 AM
Btw, it's been noted that countries with female leaders generally tend to do comparatively well in the current situation, in the sense of reducing the number of fatalities in their population.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2020/04/13/what-do-countries-with-the-best-coronavirus-reponses-have-in-common-women-leaders/#2e66375b3dec
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:21:26 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 12:07:20 AM
So my comment is a death threat to her? You know what, your avatar and signature line fits you perfectly. Probably the only self-awareness moment you ever had.

Of course it's not a death threat, but your comment feeds the idea that she is a bad and ruthless person, just based on a picture.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 18, 2020, 12:24:25 AM
In the UK to fill 24/7 Coronavirus coverage both televised and print (I don't know what will get me first, that or the virus itself!) to the exclusion of everything else. The present national debate is face masks the "experts" are telling us they do not work, but are they saying that because we don't have any. What is the consensus here - do face masks give any protection?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 18, 2020, 12:28:18 AM
I can't find a consensus either. It might reduce risks on a modest level.

Same variation from the various experts as regards

- washing with hand soap versus disinfection hand gel, and
- recommended high temperatures for washing clothes, and
- dealing with food products and their packing

etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 12:28:55 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:21:26 AM
Of course it's not a death threat, but your comment feeds the idea that she is a bad and ruthless person, just based on a picture.

My comment feeds nothing at all. It's one of a myriad comments made on an anonymous internet board frequented regularly by two dozen people at most, many of whom are left-leaning* to begin with. It's as inconsequential as any other, yours included.

*nothing wrong with that, of course; I'm just stating a fact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 18, 2020, 01:14:22 AM
Does that excuse your misogyny?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 18, 2020, 01:14:22 AM
Does that excuse your misogyny?

Another one! (not that I didn't expect it). What the hell is wrong with you guys? I just expressed the first thought that crossed my mind on seeing the picture of a particular woman. Mysogyny my a$$. But looks like for some people virtue signalling has simply become a second nature, they can't help it anymore and no matter what one says. I'm sure that had I expressed my admiration for her beatiful and attractive physical features you'd have accused me of being sexist. Yeah, whatever.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 18, 2020, 02:53:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 17, 2020, 07:27:12 AM
Yes I've come across this before, presumably due to less road traffic accidents and less deaths from other infectious deceases due to social distancing, hand washing etc.

Theoretically we may end up having fewer deaths, because the number of corona deaths don't "compensate" for the missing flu deaths of people with chronic lung- and heart diseases. The most comforting thing is, that more or probably most of the corona deaths affect the same people, who would have died from these other causes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 18, 2020, 03:46:32 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 18, 2020, 02:53:23 AM
Theoretically we may end up having fewer deaths, because the number of corona deaths don't "compensate" for the missing flu deaths of people with chronic lung- and heart diseases. The most comforting thing is, that more or probably most of the corona deaths affect the same people, who would have died from these other causes.

In the UK and in France, hospital A&E and GPs are reporting a considerable (maybe 50%) reduction in the number of non-COVID cases they're seeing. This is probably because people are afraid to see their doctor, because of the disease. Everyone here is bracing themselves for the consequences of this, i.e. patients arriving late and in a serious state with a condition less easy to treat if they'd had asked for help earlier. A friend of mine who works in St Georges Hospital in Tooting, London, in fact told me last night that he had to deal with two very serious cases of peritonitis where the patients delayed seeing a doctor until the pain was unbearable. Another friend who lives in Strasbourg said he met a nurse who told him that there has been much less to do in the regular (non-COVID) A&E dept of their largest hospital - Strasbourg has been very seriously impacted by COVID.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2020, 04:35:02 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 18, 2020, 02:53:23 AM
Theoretically we may end up having fewer deaths, because the number of corona deaths don't "compensate" for the missing flu deaths of people with chronic lung- and heart diseases. The most comforting thing is, that more or probably most of the corona deaths affect the same people, who would have died from these other causes.
I saw a story yesterday morning which gave brief histories/tributes to some of the non-famous people who recently died; one, in particular, had me choked up.  It was a story of a typically sweet, sometimes goofy, brother (with photos and videos provided by his sister).  He was 30 years old and a very healthy fitness instructor and loved his new baby niece.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 18, 2020, 04:39:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 18, 2020, 03:46:32 AM
In the UK and in France, hospital A&E and GPs are reporting a considerable (maybe 50%) reduction in the number of non-COVID cases they're seeing. This is probably because people are afraid to see their doctor, because of the disease. Everyone here is bracing themselves for the consequences of this, i.e. patients arriving late and in a serious state with a condition less easy to treat if they'd had asked for help earlier. A friend of mine who works in St Georges Hospital in Tooting, London, in fact told me last night that he had to deal with two very serious cases of peritonitis where the patients delayed seeing a doctor until the pain was unbearable. Another friend who lives in Strasbourg said he met a nurse who told him that there has been much less to do in the regular (non-COVID) A&E dept of their largest hospital - Strasbourg has been very seriously impacted by COVID.

The same trend has been noted here, with 40% less patients checking in at the Cardiology Institute. What prompts someone to seek immediate help is the chest pain. But this goes away in a day or two as the heart tissue dies. When the pain is gone, the damage has become irreversible and the person thinks it was just an indigestion or a cramp.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2020, 04:41:49 AM
Quote from: geralmar on April 17, 2020, 03:10:07 PM
More photos from Michigan protest:

(https://i.postimg.cc/Bn13Z9hT/Michigan-protesters-honk-against-coronavirus-order.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

(https://i.postimg.cc/6qwVqXLy/aptopix-virus-outbreak-michigan-dawn-perreca-protests-front-steps-of-michigan-capitol-building-640x3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Idiot can't spell "Whitmer".

Boston Globe article as good as any:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/chanting-e2-80-98lock-her-up-e2-80-99-michigan-protesters-in-maga-hats-demonstrated-against-whitmer-e2-80-99s-coronavirus-restrictions/ar-BB12JlnL


Regarding the blocked ambulance:

https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/2020/04/16/sparrow-lansing-fire-department-no-ambulances-issues-during-protest/5145522002/
Thank you for those links!

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 18, 2020, 06:14:03 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 18, 2020, 12:21:26 AM
Of course it's not a death threat, but your comment feeds the idea that she is a bad and ruthless person, just based on a picture.
When I saw that photo, my first reaction was to think they had chosen one that would evoke a negative reaction.

Here is perhaps a more positive countenance
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg/220px-Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 06:27:27 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 18, 2020, 06:14:03 AM
When I saw that photo, my first reaction was to think they had chosen one that would evoke a negative reaction.

Here is perhaps a more positive countenance
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg/220px-Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg)

     I detect a certain malevolent socialism even in this pic. That's just my first thought on the matter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 06:32:24 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 18, 2020, 06:14:03 AM
When I saw that photo, my first reaction was to think they had chosen one that would evoke a negative reaction.

Here is perhaps a more positive countenance
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg/220px-Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg)
Has anyone here ever posted a picture of Trump looking angry, or malevolent, or stupid, or confused?

Rhetorical question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 06:37:34 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 18, 2020, 06:14:03 AM
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg/220px-Gov._Gretchen_Whitmer_%28cropped%29.jpg)

Splendid teeth and perfect match between hair color and shirt. Not bad, not bad at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 07:03:31 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 06:32:24 AM
Has anyone here ever posted a picture of Trump looking angry, or malevolent, or stupid, or confused?

Rhetorical question.

     Trump's anger, malevolence, stupidity and confusion are well known and demonstrated in many non-photo ways.

     (https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/5b8ef26c6ae7020bdd3ef80d/3:2/w_1998,h_1332,c_limit/ex-trump-lawyer.jpg)

     I do wonder how it is that this photo got out. I should consult Hume on miracles.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 18, 2020, 07:20:13 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 18, 2020, 12:24:25 AMWhat is the consensus here - do face masks give any protection?

My understanding is that a face mask protects others from you, rather than the other way round, which seems logical to me. But as all advice on Covid 19 by definition has had to be hastily put together, the degree of certainty can't be very high.
The BBC news was reporting yesterday for example that newer research had concluded that droplets from a cough project farther than originally thought, which may affect future compulsory wearing of face masks in busier places e.g.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52126735


I saw the following on another forum, an antibody study suggesting that the coronavirus may be far more widespread also than previously thought, which might offer a ray of light for a return to less stringent restrictions. Like all Covid 19 studies it's speculative and early stages, but if it's corroborated by other studies, it may lead somewhere interesting.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/17/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 07:23:24 AM
There are a couple of detailed posts on masks higher up.

If you wear a mask treat its working surface as a danger and be careful how you handle it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 18, 2020, 07:30:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 01:36:34 AM
Another one! (not that I didn't expect it). What the hell is wrong with you guys? I just expressed the first thought that crossed my mind on seeing the picture of a particular woman. Mysogyny my a$$. But looks like for some people virtue signalling has simply become a second nature, they can't help it anymore and no matter what one says. I'm sure that had I expressed my admiration for her beatiful and attractive physical features you'd have accused me of being sexist. Yeah, whatever.
It's basically a religion at this point, so yep, that's how it works. Even smart people can be affected, sadly.

But you gotta be kidding about the "beautiful features." No idea who this lady is, but at least from that photo, that is one ugly face.  ;D :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on April 18, 2020, 07:35:40 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 01:36:34 AM
Another one! (not that I didn't expect it). What the hell is wrong with you guys? I just expressed the first thought that crossed my mind on seeing the picture of a particular woman. Mysogyny my a$$. But looks like for some people virtue signalling has simply become a second nature, they can't help it anymore and no matter what one says. I'm sure that had I expressed my admiration for her beatiful and attractive physical features you'd have accused me of being sexist. Yeah, whatever.

I'm going to defend Florestan here (even though his use of the term "virtue signaling" almost makes me want to take it all back). Herman and SimonNZ, my politics are much closer to yours (or at least to Simon's - I have less of a feel for Herman's) than to Florestan's, but I think you're overreading his statement here. Yes, I can see how you inferred what you did, but I took his statement as a compliment to Gov. Whitmer: in the photo she looks tough, determined, no-bullshit. Of course there are some who will see it and will take it as confirmation of their preconceived notion that she's a ball-busting bitch, but I really don't think that's what Florestan was intending to suggest.

P.S. I see that greg has just posted a related comment while I've been typing this. Him I will not defend. In fact, greg, you can fuck off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 18, 2020, 07:37:22 AM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 18, 2020, 07:35:40 AM
P.S. I see that greg has just posted a related comment while I've been typing this. Him I will not defend. In fact, greg, you can fuck off.
Nice to meet you, too, stranger.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 07:55:16 AM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 18, 2020, 07:35:40 AM
I'm going to defend Florestan here (even though his use of the term "virtue signaling" almost makes me want to take it all back). Herman and SimonNZ, my politics are much closer to yours (or at least to Simon's - I have less of a feel for Herman's) than to Florestan's, but I think you're overreading his statement here. Yes, I can see how you inferred what you did, but I took his statement as a compliment to Gov. Whitmer: in the photo she looks tough, determined, no-bullshit. Of course there are some who will see it and will take it as confirmation of their preconceived notion that she's a ball-busting bitch, but I really don't think that's what Florestan was intending to suggest.

In order to make it in politics and government you need to be a ball-buster in any case. The strange thing is this is completely okay if it concerns men. I don't think, for instance, that any of Trumps fans are under the illusion he's a nice guy. They like him because he's cruel and delights in cruelty, poking fun of people with disabilities.

However, the double standard immediately kicks into gear when a woman comes in the vicinity of power. I remember that tv debate in 2016 where Trump threw a hissy fit because (just like him) Hillary had used the bathroom. That was just disgusting!

However those are just Trump's pathologies. But so many people were saying they did not like Hillary's voice (meaning she didn't talk like Marilyn Monroe); they did not like her hair, the list was just endless. Whenever a woman has political power manbabies start talking about she's angry or evil.

Gvr Whitmer is under tremendous duress currently. She's responsible for taking care of this epidemic in her state, which is pretty hard hit. And added to this the president has been mounting a hate campaign against her because she's a woman with political power, she's a Dem and (unfortunately this is a factor, too) she is not a dowdy woman. This latter thing irritates Trump too, there is a whole history of this. He hates good looking women who don't do what he wants. When Trump singles someone out for his hate, serious death threats ensue. This has happened time and time again. Trump is not just the current president, but also the head of a crime organisation (see Michael Cohen, Manafort, et al) and things work this way. So, I can't blame Whitmer for looking stressed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 08:21:13 AM
My ignore list is growing faster than the epidemic. There are people who can suppress their need to make everything about how right they were (did you stockpile a few N95 masks prior to Christmas?) and those who cannot. I avoid the brain dead politics threads for just that reason. Now this is becoming a brain dead politics thread.
And feel free to ignore me too please.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 08:27:14 AM
Quote from: greg on April 18, 2020, 07:30:49 AM
It's basically a religion at this point, so yep, that's how it works. Even smart people can be affected, sadly.



     Though I agree that calling something a religion is insulting, I wonder why calling a religion "a religion" isn't?

     About thatwoman-ism, Trump has a bad case and it's common on the right. In the spirit of fair play, lets talk about how ugly/handsome Gov. Cuomo is, just as a first thought kind of thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 09:58:39 AM
     
     Here's something I don't understand. Why is there no federal effort to ramp up testing? I know about the failure of the original CDC test. What puzzles me is how it came about that no follow up effort has been undertaken. If ever there was a reason to use wartime production measures, this pandemic is one. If testing on a massive scale is what's needed, production of test equipment and supplies can't be needed less. Instead, efforts to reopen the country seem to involve accepting whatever level of testing states and private labs can come up with.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 18, 2020, 11:51:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 18, 2020, 01:36:34 AM
Another one! (not that I didn't expect it). What the hell is wrong with you guys? I just expressed the first thought that crossed my mind

Apparently no one is allowed to express their own thoughts about your "thoughts".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 18, 2020, 12:46:42 PM
I have seen several posts making the point that most of the elderly who die from the virus were going to die soon anyway.

My mother is 94 and has a heart condition.  She may live another week or a few years.  She may die tomorrow from the virus.  So what? Is her life and the lives of the elderly so worthless that one can steal a few days of life from them in order to save the profits of businesses?

So far we have gotten off lightly. 

How many people have to die before the deniers acknowledge we have a problem?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 18, 2020, 12:49:11 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 16, 2020, 07:38:59 AM
This is reasonable I think, if we're talking about people who don't have to work. The problem is that some of those vulnerable people may not in fact have the choice about risking their lives, because they have to pay the bills at the end of the month.

To day our parliament decided, that these vulnerable people will have the option to stay at home, which means that they will be compensated if they can't work from home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 18, 2020, 12:10:39 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/Jyz05CxW/ex-trump-lawyer.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/Jyz05CxW)

Trump's preferred photo:

(https://i.postimg.cc/WpngybM4/cpac-ct-trump-cpac-20190302-001-640x360-1.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Don't understand the ragging on Whitmer (my governor).  She's doing the best she can with no guidance from from Washington.  Because there is no coherent national coronavirus response program, each state -- all 50 of them-- has had to craft its own program.  Democrat Whitmer is under attack because Trump barely won Michigan in 2016 and the Republicans are doing everything they can to undermine her, public health be damned.

Whitmer is under attack for some foolish actions. She banned the sale of car safety seats for children, and seeds. Some of her directives have been unclear. She badly screwed up with FEMA, failing to file the request for aid.

It is the states which have the power and the infrastructure to respond to the virus. They also have very divergent local conditions, and the relevant local knowledge. No one size fits all response is going to work. The federal role is to facilitate and help, and governors of both parties have praised the co operation they have received.

There is in fact some national policy too. The USA was ahead of most western countries in flight bans for instance. The new re opening guidelines are a coherent policy (but Trump is wrong imagining he has the power to dictate it, or anything much, to the states). The hold up in testing, which has been catastrophic, is the result precisely of having a uniform federal standard: the FDA and CDC would not allow states or private labs to innovate but insisted on their own, broken tests. (Contrast this with Germany, where each state is "on its own" to develop tests, and have.)

There is another advantage to a diversity of responses. We don't know what is right, and it's better to see what works and adapt than to impose one approach a priori. Federalism is an advantage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 01:05:27 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on April 18, 2020, 12:46:42 PM
How many people have to die before the deniers acknowledge we have a problem?

For some of them, millions. I wish I were just being sardonic. I have seen comments to that effect. One denialist took the 2mm estimate for the USA and decided that it was better than a temporary lockdown and increased distancing measures.
I frequent one site with a lot of Trumpkins. They are sharply divided, but a large bunch are solid denialists. It worries me because that kind of thinking will make lead people to not comply with the precautions. As we saw in Lansing. So, how many outbreaks will it take to convince them? Many. Many.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 18, 2020, 01:09:01 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 09:58:39 AM
     
     Here's something I don't understand. Why is there no federal effort to ramp up testing? I know about the failure of the original CDC test. What puzzles me is how it came about that no follow up effort has been undertaken. If ever there was a reason to use wartime production measures, this pandemic is one. If testing on a massive scale is what's needed, production of test equipment and supplies can't be needed less. Instead, efforts to reopen the country seem to involve accepting whatever level of testing states and private labs can come up with.

   

+1

One of your posts which you neglected to obfuscate.

The defective initial test from the CDC was an astonishing blunder. The failure to form a public/private project to manufacture test materials and equipment on the largest scale possible is far worse. This was the responsibility of the White House, which is supposed to collect information from all parts of the federal bureaucracy and marshal forces for an emergency response. Relying on an uncoordinated response of private companies and states had created a patchwork system that has plateaued at an inadequate level. According to reports I've seen we need three times the current level of testing to safely relax social distancing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 01:44:34 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 18, 2020, 01:19:58 PM
Jacksonville, Florida, opened beaches yesterday:


(https://i.postimg.cc/1RnpD7cm/960x0.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Yes, for walking but with rules. No chairs, no towels, no sunbathing, no groups (over 5 I think). It's not quite a case of "Florida man" again.
That said, I would avoid the place. It's clear a lot disagree with me ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on April 18, 2020, 01:45:18 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM
Whitmer is under attack for some foolish actions. She banned the sale of car safety seats for children, and seeds.
Or maybe she did not.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/492579-michigan-governor-responds-to-meghan-mccain-buying-child-car-seats-not
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/15/facebook-posts/covid-order-doesnt-ban-gardening-or-sale-seeds-and/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 01:46:03 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM
The hold up in testing, which has been catastrophic, is the result precisely of having a uniform federal standard: the FDA and CDC would not allow states or private labs to innovate but insisted on their own, broken tests. (Contrast this with Germany, where each state is "on its own" to develop tests, and have.)

Federalism is an advantage.


    Federalism is neither an advantage or disadvantage in a national crisis. Competence can take whatever form.

    German testing is under the supervision of the Robert Koch Institute, as national as can be.

    I mentioned before the CDC test blunder, and you can add to that weak national pandemic planning going back decades. It's not lousy to have a federal plan because we have not implemented sound federal planning. And the lousy plans going back several administrations are not a sign of the virtues of federalism.

    I am not tempted to conclude that because Trump is President nothing Presidents do is worth doing. The federal role should not shrink because Trump shrunk it.

   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 01:48:50 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 18, 2020, 01:09:01 PM


One of your posts which you neglected to obfuscate.


     I was in a hurry. Next time I'll apply the full treatment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on April 18, 2020, 01:57:18 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 18, 2020, 07:55:16 AM
In order to make it in politics and government you need to be a ball-buster in any case. The strange thing is this is completely okay if it concerns men. I don't think, for instance, that any of Trumps fans are under the illusion he's a nice guy. They like him because he's cruel and delights in cruelty, poking fun of people with disabilities.

However, the double standard immediately kicks into gear when a woman comes in the vicinity of power. I remember that tv debate in 2016 where Trump threw a hissy fit because (just like him) Hillary had used the bathroom. That was just disgusting!

However those are just Trump's pathologies. But so many people were saying they did not like Hillary's voice (meaning she didn't talk like Marilyn Monroe); they did not like her hair, the list was just endless. Whenever a woman has political power manbabies start talking about she's angry or evil.

Gvr Whitmer is under tremendous duress currently. She's responsible for taking care of this epidemic in her state, which is pretty hard hit. And added to this the president has been mounting a hate campaign against her because she's a woman with political power, she's a Dem and (unfortunately this is a factor, too) she is not a dowdy woman. This latter thing irritates Trump too, there is a whole history of this. He hates good looking women who don't do what he wants. When Trump singles someone out for his hate, serious death threats ensue. This has happened time and time again. Trump is not just the current president, but also the head of a crime organisation (see Michael Cohen, Manafort, et al) and things work this way. So, I can't blame Whitmer for looking stressed.

Oh, yes, I'm well aware of the double standard. I agree with everything you said here. I find it fascinating (and distressing, too, of course) that Trump's fans like him not in spite of the fact that he's an asshole, but because of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2020, 02:02:49 PM
Quote from: geralmar on April 18, 2020, 01:19:58 PM
Jacksonville, Florida, opened beaches yesterday:


(https://i.postimg.cc/1RnpD7cm/960x0.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
I looked at an article here:  https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/17/gov-ron-desantis-gives-some-florida-beaches-green-light-to-reopen.html  Hard to tell by the photo; it looks like some people are being good at distancing...not so certain about others in the background?  It's also not possible to know how big the 'cell' sizes are either.  Not keen on the idea that I'm not seeing any people wearing masks there though....not even the police officer.   :(  I noticed that they also are limiting the hours too. 6-11 a.m. and 5-8 p.m.  Will be interesting to see how this experiment goes.  I wish the best to them.  As for myself, I'm going for walks...mostly heading to trails which are pretty quiet...busier, of course, on nice sunny days.  Most people are pretty good, but (and I hate to say it) a good chunk of the 'young ones' seem to be lost in their own world and clueless to a large extent about minding their distances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 18, 2020, 03:37:14 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 08:21:13 AM
My ignore list is growing faster than the epidemic. There are people who can suppress their need to make everything about how right they were (did you stockpile a few N95 masks prior to Christmas?) and those who cannot. I avoid the brain dead politics threads for just that reason. Now this is becoming a brain dead politics thread.
And feel free to ignore me too please.

No, no...it's "brain-washed."

Should I sabre-rattle about my ignore list now that you've said something rude?


meanwhile:

Coronavirus hits staff close to Nigerian and Afghan presidents
Muhammadu Buhari's chief of staff dies and 20 people close to Ashraf Ghani test positive (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/nigerian-presidents-chief-of-staff-dies-from-coronavirus)

Ecuador's death rate soars as fears grow over scale of coronavirus crisis
Mortalities in one province leap from 3,000 to 11,000 in six weeks, with health and mortuary services overwhelmed (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/17/coronavirus-death-toll-in-ecuador-could-be-far-higher-than-thought)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 18, 2020, 07:59:35 PM
There is absolutely no way to overstate the degree to which Trump and the Republicans have politicized the pandemic:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa/u-s-coronavirus-crisis-takes-a-sharp-political-turn-idUSKBN21Z2HN


(https://i.postimg.cc/htvqKZD8/california-lockdown-protester.png) (https://postimages.org/) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 10:18:20 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM
Whitmer is under attack for some foolish actions. She banned the sale of car safety seats for children, and seeds. Some of her directives have been unclear. She badly screwed up with FEMA, failing to file the request for aid.


These are myths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2020, 10:23:54 PM
The idea that we're shutting down society / economy just to grant octogenarians just a little longer life is a distortion, too. Yes, very old people are very vulnerable. But the ICUs are full with men in their 40s and 50s. Quite often they have weight problems, but not even that. Healthy middleaged men can have a killer auto-immune reaction. The way this epidemic has been used to wedge old people apart as expendable is rather disenchanting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 18, 2020, 11:31:10 PM
We've never made a successful vaccine for a coronavirus before. This is why it's so difficult

https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2020-04-17/coronavirus-vaccine-ian-frazer/12146616


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 19, 2020, 12:03:11 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM

The USA was ahead of most western countries in flight bans for instance.

For instance? That is actually the only thing I can think of....
Probably because travel bans come natural to Trump.

Not that I would compare any Western country' favourably to any other!
The only countries that were prepared and resonded timely are Asian.
Not because they are smarter or better, but because the previous SARS outbreak taught them a hard and valuable lesson.
It seems countries are like just people: sometimes (often) just knowing of a danger, is not the same as experiencing it. But it is not rational, it is pretty stupid.....yet very human...

But there are of course various levels of stupidity.
Bolsonaro of Brazil denies the dangers of the virus. As does Belarusian Lukashenko, who described the global panic as a "psychosis".

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 12:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 18, 2020, 07:35:40 AM
I'm going to defend Florestan here (even though his use of the term "virtue signaling" almost makes me want to take it all back). Herman and SimonNZ, my politics are much closer to yours (or at least to Simon's - I have less of a feel for Herman's) than to Florestan's,

Thanks, I appreciate your honesty and courage.

Here's my politics. Politically I'm a liberal, economically a centrist, socially and culturally a conservative, musically a classico-romantic, religiously an Orthodox Christian (though not a very church-going one and certainly not a perfect one). In all instances I uphold the rule of law and value morality and common sense over ideological committment. I abhor fanaticism, be it right or left, and I'm  utterly opposed to any form of censorship, be it right or left.

You decide how far or how close you are to me.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 19, 2020, 01:49:00 AM
Nearly seven million jobs at risk if lockdown lasts for months

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/19/nearly-seven-million-jobs-at-risk-if-lockdown-lasts-for-months
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 19, 2020, 02:48:32 AM
Heard a good radio program with some leading hospital people here, including working scientists/doctors, they suggested that:

1) treatment: prospects for finding good treatments seem good, 5 different types are being tested in Denmark, and procedure-establishing results are likely to be had within 2-3 months. Promising types include Remdesivir.

2) finding the specific factors for those people who are particularly at risk, is an important task; currently these patterns are difficult to establish, but fully reliable results should probably come within 3-4 months.

3) a reliable vaccine is likely to be the last thing coming, maybe in 18 months, due to the difficulties and testing involved. The talks about a vaccine maybe ready in September (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52329659) could also perhaps be influenced by a wish for more funding. Danish authorities (that follow 12 of the better projects globally) are not expecting any vaccines this year.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Kaga2 on April 19, 2020, 06:19:20 AM
"Probably because travel bans come natural to Trump."

And there it is.

Goodbye all, this discussion is too much driven by prior politics and resentment. I think most of you unserious, petty people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 19, 2020, 06:21:19 AM
A closely watched study suggests that Mass. is nearing the peak as we report 156 new coronavirus deaths, nearly 2,000 new cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 19, 2020, 06:27:26 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 19, 2020, 06:21:19 AM
A closely watched study suggests that Mass. is nearing the peak as we report 156 new coronavirus deaths, nearly 2,000 new cases.

State health officials reported 156 new deaths from COVID-19, bringing the total deaths attributed to the disease to 1,560, and confirmed nearly 2,000 new cases, increasing that count to more than 36,000 in Massachusetts alone.

The increases were near, but slightly below, numbers seen in recent days. And they come as researchers running a widely cited coronavirus model at the University of Washington said the caseloads here may be peaking, and sharply lowered their estimates for deaths in Massachusetts.

The newest numbers from the state are the latest sign that the long-anticipated "surge" in coronavirus cases has arrived. So far, Governor Charlie Baker said Saturday, the state's hospitals appear to be holding up.

"Generally speaking," Baker said, "People feel pretty good about where we are with respect to [hospital capacity]. That's been an important part of how we manage our way through this."

There's still a lot to manage through. Massachusetts has reported more confirmed cases than much larger states such as Texas and California, according to the COVID Tracking Project. Businesses and schools across the state remain shut down and stay-at-home advisories have turned neighborhoods eerily quiet. White House coronavirus response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx on Saturday mentioned Boston as one of a handful of hot spots her office is watching closely.

But there are some signs that all that social distancing is slowing the spread of the highly contagious disease.

After adding in data that tracks people's movement around cities, models run by the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation now predict both deaths and impact on hospitals in Massachusetts will peak by Monday, instead of the end of this month. Their total projection for deaths here are now just over 3,200.

Those models, which have emerged as a popular measuring stick for when life may return to normal, have themselves become controversial, swinging dramatically as researchers have incorporated new data. Earlier this week, when they projected some 8,000 deaths in Massachusetts, officials here pushed back, saying the model's assumptions don't match the reality of life on the ground here. Some epidemiologists have faulted them on scientific grounds, saying their methodology is far too back-of-the-envelope to guide weighty decisions about when to "re-open" the economy.

Regardless, Baker said Saturday, the state is doing everything it can to contain the virus, and manage it in the long months ahead until treatments and vaccines are developed.

Massachusetts has quickly ramped up testing, becoming a "top-five player in terms of testing per capita," he said. More than 8,000 people received coronavirus tests Saturday, according to the Department of Public Health, for a total of nearly 157,000 tests so far. The state has distributed about 4 million pieces of personal protective equipment to hospitals and other health care facilities since the outbreak began, Baker said. And it's ramping up the nation's most ambitious "contact tracing" program to find people who've come in contact with someone confirmed to have COVID-19 and prevent further spread.

"The most important thing we're going to need to be able to do is identify people who've been infected, get in touch, and help them isolate," he said. "That, from our point of view, is just a crucial element in our ability to provide people with confidence that we're doing all we can."

Still, the virus is taking an astounding toll, particularly in the state's nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.

Saturday's figures showed, for the first time, that more than half of the people who've died from coronavirus in Massachusetts were residents of long-term care facilities, and 250 such facilities have confirmed cases. The hard-hit Holyoke Soldiers' Home had another resident die Saturday, bringing the total confirmed deaths from COVID-19 there to 48. The Chelsea Soldiers' Home also reported another resident coronavirus death Saturday.

The Massachusetts National Guard has been visiting nursing homes to test residents and staff, and Baker said state officials are trying to help these facilities rethink their operations to help reduce the spread of disease, no simple feat in places that are set up to encourage socialization and where staff often float from room to room.

"They are basically set up for people to engage with each other," he said. "The whole point is not to isolate people."

In Brockton, Mayor Robert Sullivan said Saturday a significant portion of the city's 48 COVID-19 deaths were patients at long-term care facilities.

"We know that the virus really attacks the seniors," Sullivan said. "They're the most vulnerable."

Out on the streets of Boston, the focus remains containing the spread of the disease. The Walsh Administration on Sunday plans to send out sound trucks to hard-hit neighborhoods such as Mattapan, Dorchester, and East Boston, broadcasting messages in seven languages to stay home, and stay healthy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 19, 2020, 06:30:55 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 19, 2020, 06:21:19 AM
A closely watched study suggests that Mass. is nearing the peak as we report 156 new coronavirus deaths, nearly 2,000 new cases.

     NPR is now saying it will be April 29, and the latest revision anticipates 241 deaths at the peak, up from 203 a few days ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2020, 06:51:45 AM
I saw images of ambulances backed up waiting to get into hospitals in Russia on the news today:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8211727/Dozens-ambulances-filled-suspected-coronavirus-patients-wait-hours-outside-Moscow-hospitals.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 19, 2020, 07:41:07 AM
     Americans at World Health Organization transmitted real-time information about coronavirus to Trump administration (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/americans-at-world-health-organization-transmitted-real-time-information-about-coronavirus-to-trump-administration/2020/04/19/951c77fa-818c-11ea-9040-68981f488eed_story.html)

The presence of so many U.S. officials undercuts President Trump's charge that the WHO's failure to communicate the extent of the threat, born of a desire to protect China, is largely responsible for the rapid spread of the virus in the United States.

The administration has also sharply criticized the Chinese government for withholding information.

But the president, who often touts a personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping and is reluctant to inflict damage on a trade deal with Beijing, appears to see the WHO as a more defenseless target.


     Trump has gone from "China virus" to "WHO virus". Truly, anyone will do, as long as he isn't blamed for what he didn't do.

     Other leaders think US disengagement with the WHO increases Chinese leverage over the organization. It makes sense to me. Isn't that dangerous? Wouldn't we have been better off to have more American experts in China?

     U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak (https://www.physiciansweekly.com/exclusive-u-s-axed-cdc/)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.

The American disease expert, a medical epidemiologist embedded in China's disease control agency, left her post in July, according to four sources with knowledge of the issue. The first cases of the new coronavirus may have emerged as early as November, and as cases exploded, the Trump administration in February chastised China for censoring information about the outbreak and keeping U.S. experts from entering the country to help.

"It was heartbreaking to watch," said Bao-Ping Zhu, a Chinese American who served in that role, which was funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, between 2007 and 2011. "If someone had been there, public health officials and governments across the world could have moved much faster."

Zhu and the other sources said the American expert, Dr. Linda Quick, was a trainer of Chinese field epidemiologists who were deployed to the epicenter of outbreaks to help track, investigate and contain diseases.

As an American CDC employee, they said, Quick was in an ideal position to be the eyes and ears on the ground for the United States and other countries on the coronavirus outbreak, and might have alerted them to the growing threat weeks earlier.


    The delay in the warning doesn't excuse weeks of bumbling after.

Quick left amid a bitter U.S. trade dispute with China when she learned her federally funded post, officially known as resident adviser to the U.S. Field Epidemiology Training Program in China, would be discontinued as of September, the sources said. The U.S. CDC said it first learned of a "cluster of 27 cases of pneumonia" of unexplained origin in Wuhan, China, on Dec. 31.

     There's no excuse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on April 19, 2020, 07:46:35 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 08:21:13 AM
My ignore list is growing faster than the epidemic. There are people who can suppress their need to make everything about how right they were (did you stockpile a few N95 masks prior to Christmas?) and those who cannot. I avoid the brain dead politics threads for just that reason. Now this is becoming a brain dead politics thread.
And feel free to ignore me too please.
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 18, 2020, 12:59:11 PM
Whitmer is under attack for some foolish actions. She banned the sale of car safety seats for children, and seeds.
Quote from: North Star on April 18, 2020, 01:45:18 PM
Or maybe she did not.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/492579-michigan-governor-responds-to-meghan-mccain-buying-child-car-seats-not
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/apr/15/facebook-posts/covid-order-doesnt-ban-gardening-or-sale-seeds-and/
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 19, 2020, 06:19:20 AM
"Probably because travel bans come natural to Trump."

And there it is.

Goodbye all, this discussion is too much driven by prior politics and resentment. I think most of you unserious, petty people.
Ta-ta, you personification of seriousness and objectivity, we will try to keep learning even if you are not with us!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 07:52:45 AM
Quote from: North Star on April 19, 2020, 07:46:35 AM
Ta-ta, you personification of seriousness and objectivity, we will try to keep learning even if you are not with us!

What the fuck do you mean?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 19, 2020, 08:00:42 AM
Ohhh.. you said f - word!

A lot of people are understandably on edge, and that seems to be the case with Kaga2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 08:11:24 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 19, 2020, 08:00:42 AM
Ohhh.. you said f - word!

Fuck!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 19, 2020, 08:38:41 AM

     https://www.youtube.com/v/22SQVZ4CeXA&feature=emb_logo

     No, Angela, it's Chynahh! It's the WHO and tyrannical governors! Where's the blame?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on April 19, 2020, 09:03:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 07:52:45 AM
What the fuck do you mean?
Hristos a inviat!

Just that it's a bit silly to call most of the posters in a topic petty, unserious people , while spreading fake news and failing to acknowledge that when it's pointed out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 19, 2020, 10:00:51 AM
Detroit mayor rejects National Guard food distribution assistance because of 1967 riots:

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2020/04/17/coronavirus-duggan-rejects-national-guard-offer/5154290002/

Even in the midst of pandemic political turf must be protected.  Especially disappointing because mayor is usually quite decent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 19, 2020, 10:05:26 AM
Migrant workers bear brunt of coronavirus pandemic in Gulf
Rights groups say host countries should offer foreign workers same protections as citizens (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/19/migrant-workers-bear-brunt-of-coronavirus-pandemic-in-gulf)


Pandemic raises fears over welfare of domestic workers in Lebanon
Covid-19 lockdown could leave migrant workers across Middle East confined to employers' households without pay, NGOs warn (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/16/pandemic-raises-fears-over-welfare-of-domestic-workers-in-lebanon)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 10:08:08 AM
Quote from: North Star on April 19, 2020, 09:03:41 AM

Hristos a înviat! Adevărat a înviat!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 10:08:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 19, 2020, 10:08:08 AM
Hristos a înviat! Adevărat a înviat!

Quote from: North Star on April 19, 2020, 09:03:41 AM
Hristos a inviat!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 19, 2020, 10:33:26 AM
Economic consequences of C19 -- rather good and informed I think.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000h1ms
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 19, 2020, 11:22:32 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 08:27:14 AM
     Though I agree that calling something a religion is insulting, I wonder why calling a religion "a religion" isn't?
Context, maybe?


Quote from: drogulus on April 18, 2020, 08:27:14 AM
About thatwoman-ism, Trump has a bad case and it's common on the right. In the spirit of fair play, lets talk about how ugly/handsome Gov. Cuomo is, just as a first thought kind of thing.
Ok. That dude is oooogly.  :D
And so is Cheeto man.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 19, 2020, 11:28:06 AM
Quick recovery? Not likely in Massachusetts, as a coronavirus-induced recession stuns economy
Unlike previous recessions, the state's leading industries are particularly affected by the pandemic shutdown

When the financial crisis hit in 2008, the blow wasn't quite as bad for Massachusetts as for other parts of the country thanks to its formidable mix of industries — from higher education to health care, from technology to life sciences.

This time will be different.

A month into what may prove to be the most devastating economic collapse since the 1930s, the region's world-famous hospitals and universities find themselves too crippled by COVID-19 to provide a soft landing. White-collar professionals, another bulwark of the state economy, are also bracing for the worst. With Europe and China also in trouble, Massachusetts won't be getting much of a lift from exports or international travelers.

The Great Recession, triggered by a mortgage meltdown and recklessness by banks and investment firms, required the government and Federal Reserve to put the financial system on life support. By contrast, the coronavirus pandemic in a matter of weeks has inflicted far more damage: an abrupt and intentional shutdown of a broad swath of the economy, 22 million people out of work, trillions of dollars in stock market losses.

The country is in uncharted waters. But this much is clear: In Massachusetts, this downturn will be particularly painful and the recovery slower than usual, according to business leaders and economists.

Consider how the virus is upending the higher-education sector, where employment barely budged during the financial crisis a decade ago. Hundreds of thousands of students were sent home in March, and some universities are planning for the possibility they won't return to Boston in the fall if the virus has not been contained or a vaccine found.

Even Harvard, the world's richest school, is freezing salaries, forgoing new hires, and may delay some capital projects.

"There is no doubt that pre-vaccine we're all going to suffer together. That was not true in 2008 to 2010," said Boston University president Robert A. Brown.

If students don't come back until next spring, the economic fallout would be enormous, not only from another wave of layoffs on campuses, but also from a depressed rental housing market and lost spending from students and parents who no longer will be eating in restaurants, shopping in stores, or staying in hotels.

Furloughs and pay cuts are also hitting another mainstay of the Massachusetts economy and its biggest employer with about 650,000 workers: health care.

COVID-19 has eviscerated hospital revenue by forcing the postponement of routine care and elective surgeries, which is how hospitals and doctors make most of their money. The health care system instead is flooded with coronavirus patients, who tend to be poor or old, and on Medicaid or Medicare, which pay at a lower rate than private insurers. As unemployment skyrockets during the pandemic, hospitals will also have to contend with more people switching to government-sponsored insurance, which will lower provider payments.

"Historically, recessions have been good for medicine overall," said Dr. Eric Dickson, chief executive of UMass Memorial Health Care in Worcester. "That's just not the case with this one."

Dickson said revenue at his hospital is off 35 percent in April. So far he has resisted furloughs, hoping there will be a pent-up demand for services in the second half of the year. "It is a little bit of a gamble on our part," acknowledged Dickson, but "people are working really hard."

Dr. Steven Strongwater, CEO of Atrius Health, instituted temporary salary cuts and furloughs across its network of more than 1,100 physicians, nurses, and other clinicians that includes Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates.

While Strongwater intends to restore pay at a later date, he thinks it will take some time for business to return to the levels prior to COVID-19. He also anticipates the shutdown could lead to a wave of closures and bankruptcies of community hospitals, nursing homes, and doctor practices.

"We probably won't see a settling out until 2021 at the earliest," he said.

Healthy hospitals and universities, along with the other major institutions of Boston's landscape, from museums to tourist hot spots to sporting events, create a spillover effect that helps sustain many businesses in the area.

Garrett Harker's restaurants benefit from their proximity to Boston's colleges and health care institutions, as well as another major economic driver that isn't reopening soon: Fenway Park.

"Those three things are gone. I have nothing right now in terms of micro drivers of the neighborhood," said Harker, a partner in seven restaurants, including Eastern Standard and Island Creek Oyster Bar in Kenmore Square, and Row 34 in the Seaport. "When I look back at 2008 ... we were definitely insulated."

During the last recession, from December 2007 through June 2009, the state's mix of knowledge-based jobs helped moderate the pain of steep layoffs in construction, manufacturing, and retail. The health care industry actually added 22,300 jobs, an increase of 4.6 percent, while the education sector held steady. Losses among business and scientific professionals were proportionally smaller than the state's average. Unemployment peaked at 8.8 percent at the end of 2009, compared with 10 percent nationally.

This time around, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation forecasts unemployment approaching 18 percent by the end of June, with 570,000 jobs disappearing in recent weeks. Many of those jobs will be recovered by next spring, but total employment won't return to pre-crisis levels until 2022, the foundation predicts.

Moody's, the Wall Street rating agency, ranked Boston seventh among major metro areas in terms of exposure to the virus's economic impact, based on the high number of COVID-19 cases here, an aging population, urban density, and its international travel and financial services sectors.

"Boston typically does weather recessions better than the rest of the country because it has industries that are less cyclical," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. "In this particular case, probably not. ... It's going to be a slog."

Another big sector that will feel a large hit from the pandemic is professional and business services, which includes accountants and lawyers, consultants, computer industry professionals, and scientists.

When their clients suffer, they suffer.

Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni, an intellectual property law firm with an office in Boston, had planned to add a couple of attorneys but instead put in a hiring freeze. One worry: Research and development work that is the mainstay of intellectual property legal business is often cut during bad times.

"We have been contacted by some of our bigger clients to expect a slowdown in coming months," said Scott T. Bluni, a senior principal, adding that the firm is in good shape to weather the storm.

The life sciences industry is another stalwart of the Massachusetts economy that is bracing for short-term pain. The giant medical device maker Boston Scientific cut wages this month for many of its 36,000 employees, while a number of biotechs have postponed or halted costly clinical trials for experimental medicines.

Hospitals, where drug trials typically take place, are overwhelmed treating coronavirus patients, and drug firms are loath to run trials where participants could be exposed to the contagious disease. When trials are interrupted or postponed, it can delay applications for drug approvals and the ability to market the sliver of medicines that win approval.

Boston is also a financial services hub, and bear markets are never good for the industry. The city is one of the top three metro areas most dependent on Wall Street, according to Moody's. The others are New York City and the Bridgeport, Conn., metro area.

When financial markets decline, so does the revenue from managing clients' money at major employers such as Fidelity Investments and Putnam Investments. That can translate into lower bonuses and potential layoffs, which threaten consumer spending and state tax collections.

"Instead of snap layoffs, the more likely scenario for the next six months or so is a hit to compensation," said Kevin Quirk, a principal at Casey Quirk, a unit of Deloitte Consulting that advises the asset management industry.

To be sure, volatile markets can be a plus for fund managers as their clients turn to them for advice. Fidelity said recently it would accelerate plans to hire thousands of advisers and other workers to meet increased demand.

Massachusetts has the highest per-capita income among states, fueled in part by stock-based compensation among the professional class and income from investment portfolios. When the markets are down, so too is that money, and all the spending power it delivers to the local economy, from eating out, to furniture shopping, to taking in a show.

Ordinarily, the technology sector should ride out a recession better than most. But in this downturn, "there is not an industry that tech doesn't sell into," said Maia Heymann, cofounder of the Cambridge venture capital firm Converge. With nearly every industry hit by the slowdown, she said, "that uncertainty is pausing purchasing."

Heymann said investors and their companies must reset financial goals because the pandemic has upended business plans. "Your muscle memory is growth," she said. "We have to train a new set of muscles, which is sustained survivability."

That may translate into less money invested in early-stage startups, a contributor to job growth in the local tech sector.

"Right now we don't think we're going to have the capital to be able to grow efficiently," said Brittany Greenfield, CEO of Boston startup Wabbi, which makes security tools for software developers.

As for all those cranes in the sky that came to symbolize Boston's gilded age, the long-running building boom will probably take a pause, experts say.

The billions of dollars of projects that are under construction will probably be completed, but new buildings that haven't broken ground yet could find it difficult to get financed, meaning the next boom could take longer to launch.

"We're in the middle of the hurricane right now," said Boston developer and hotelier Dick Friedman. "It's very hard to see a blue sky and calm day in that storm."

* * *

Most analysts agree this recession will be the worst since the Great Depression. Yet forecasting the length and depth of the decline, and the contours of any recovery, is far more complicated given the unprecedented nature and velocity of the pandemic-propelled meltdown. Social distancing measures have forced the economy into hibernation, and some restrictions are expected to continue even after nonessential businesses reopen.

A survey by the National Association for Business Economics released last week found a huge variance in how bad the hit will be: Some economists estimated the economy would shrink by an annualized 1 percent in the April-June quarter; others by as much as 50 percent. The consensus estimate still came in at a whopping 26.5 percent decline.

Forecasts for recovery are similarly varied. Some economists see a "V" rebound, with growth surging back to previous levels. Others see a "U" recovery, with several quarters of minimal growth before things turn up.

"Neither is impossible, but I think a Nike Swoosh with a zig-zagged back half is more likely, as intermittent isolation is applied," said Megan Greene, an economist and a senior fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School, describing a steep decline followed by a longer, uneven recovery.

Yet amid the dismal forecasts, stock prices have recently rallied in response to massive Federal Reserve rescue lending and hopes that the economy will begin to reopen soon. The Standard & Poor's 500 index has gained 28 percent since bottoming out March 23.The benchmark remains down 15 percent from its Feb. 19 peak.

Any rebound will differ sector by sector. If hospitals and doctors can reschedule elective procedures to later in the year, the losses won't be as brutal. But for the Boston hospitality industry — which has been among the hardest hit, along with restaurants and retail — the road back could take two years, said Rachel Roginsky, owner of Pinnacle Advisory Group, a Boston hotel consulting firm.

That's longer than it took to recover from the Great Recession or the 2001 terrorist attacks.

International visitors won't be returning for some time. Ditto conventions and corporate travelers. With less demand, Roginsky expects Boston hotels won't command the same prices when they reopen and will experience an "interim normal" of reduced business until people feel comfortable enough to socialize and travel again.


The Massachusetts economy will come back, and its post-pandemic future could be as solid as ever. Innovations abound, whether it's life science companies looking for a COVID-19 cure or health care finally embracing telemedicine and universities perfecting online education.

Boston, observes Northeastern University president Joseph Aoun, is well positioned to thrive in a world in which protecting public health will be paramount. That plays well to the region's strength as a medical-industrial powerhouse anchored by academic research hospitals and biotechnology firms.

The health crisis is also likely to remake the global supply chain, bringing more factory jobs back to the United States. Aoun said Massachusetts, which is known as a leader in advanced manufacturing, stands to benefit.

"This community faces challenges, and this community provides solutions to those challenges," said Aoun. "Boston is resilient."

Hiawatha Bray, Deirdre Fernandes, Tim Logan, and Jonathan Saltzman of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on April 19, 2020, 11:40:45 AM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 19, 2020, 06:19:20 AM
"Probably because travel bans come natural to Trump."

And there it is.

Goodbye all, this discussion is too much driven by prior politics and resentment. I think most of you unserious, petty people.

Bullshit. Travel/immigration bans are a reflex for Trump and his go-to move because they're popular with his base. Are you so naive as to think he really cared whether it was an effective measure against the virus? If he thought it was he's a fool, especially in light of the repeated warnings from experts that it wasn't. It was a cynical political act performed for his own personal agenda. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 19, 2020, 11:55:38 AM
Plus his initial Europe travel restrictions didn't include countries where he has business interests. Like the virus cares.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 19, 2020, 01:51:54 PM
It's very frustrating here in the UK to see NHS staff desperately short of PPE pleading for more, and yet hear numerous reports of British companies contacting the government saying they can both manufacture the gowns and are keen to help, who are meeting an absolute wall of silence and never getting a reply.
It was highlighted again by the shadow Health Secretary on the BBC news tonight. I do wonder what's going on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2020, 02:20:59 PM
Quote from: Kaga2 on April 19, 2020, 06:19:20 AM
"Probably because travel bans come natural to Trump."

And there it is.

Goodbye all, this discussion is too much driven by prior politics and resentment. I think most of you unserious, petty people.
We're all really stressed right now....please take a deep breath all (not just Kaga2)...and think about trying to keep an open mind to what others are saying here....and perhaps not being so critical.  We're all trying to figure this out....so, please, be kind to one another.  It's rough enough as is....please!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 19, 2020, 02:50:46 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2020, 02:20:59 PM
We're all really stressed right now....please take a deep breath all (not just Kaga2)...and think about trying to keep an open mind to what others are saying here....and perhaps not being so critical.  We're all trying to figure this out....so, please, be kind to one another.  It's rough enough as is....please!

Thank you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 19, 2020, 06:34:47 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2020, 02:20:59 PM
We're all really stressed right now....please take a deep breath all (not just Kaga2)...and think about trying to keep an open mind to what others are saying here....and perhaps not being so critical.  We're all trying to figure this out....so, please, be kind to one another.  It's rough enough as is....please!

A pandemic necessarily requires our response as a polity.  I can't think of anything more political, except perhaps climate change.  I suppose we could talk about policy only in the abstract, but that strikes me as a kind of weird kabuki theater to engage in as people die around us.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 19, 2020, 09:01:24 PM
Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates below)


https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/?fbclid=IwAR3Bn8tMr5QQzyfeyhDPOuS7myxojboi_kfY1TDokfse2POkzGj9d0x6I4k
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 19, 2020, 09:28:17 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 19, 2020, 09:01:24 PM
Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates below)


https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/?fbclid=IwAR3Bn8tMr5QQzyfeyhDPOuS7myxojboi_kfY1TDokfse2POkzGj9d0x6I4k

I've never seen those lethality numbers anywhere else ("20 times lower", which puts it in influenza territory).  They don't make any sense, either, given the death rate we are seeing even with social distancing measures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 19, 2020, 09:39:52 PM
Interesting as a counterweight to many trends, but they clearly also have an agenda of their own, and they seem to catalogue more or less everything they find directed against say the Western government-ordered lock-downs.

Some of the info is extremely selective, or edited; the lock down in Denmark is not generally 'regretted', they found a Danish professor against it, but the lock down measures, that were the result of consensus, are now loosened up carefully, because of previous positive effects and the social distancing consciousness it has promoted, for example. And it is highly debatable whether Sweden is doing just fine, cf the current fatalities statistics compared to its neighbours, and whether US protests against lockdowns are the result of well-informed critique. I also trust the Danish doctors' widespread decisions regarding the necessity of using ventilation machines, rather than not using them, which that website apparently recommends.

EDIT: from their reports, it can be seen that they are also pro-Assad and see the war as a NATO initiative, information about gas attacks and atrocities from the Syrian regime and the activities of human rights groups as nothing but deception from Western powers, etc. So a rather polarizing/extremist website.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 19, 2020, 11:08:10 PM
Quote from: Iota on April 19, 2020, 01:51:54 PM
It's very frustrating here in the UK to see NHS staff desperately short of PPE pleading for more, and yet hear numerous reports of British companies contacting the government saying they can both manufacture the gowns and are keen to help, who are meeting an absolute wall of silence and never getting a reply.
It was highlighted again by the shadow Health Secretary on the BBC news tonight. I do wonder what's going on.

Yes, there was supposed to be a big delivery of PPE from Turkey yesterday which never arrived. Driving yesterday to go for a walk on the South Downs (we are allowed to drive to go for a walk now as long as the walk is longer than the drive) we passed several ambulances on the road. Of course they could be dealing with non-Coronavirus medical emergencies but I still found it disconcerting. The lack of PPE for doctors, nurses, and carers is a national disgrace. It's like when the Russian Army in World War One were sent into battle without rifles ('pick one up from a fallen comrade') and in some cases without boots on their feet. The govt's increasingly unconvincing attempt to distance themselves from blame is transparent for all to see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 19, 2020, 11:36:35 PM
Quote from: Iota on April 19, 2020, 01:51:54 PM
It's very frustrating here in the UK to see NHS staff desperately short of PPE pleading for more, and yet hear numerous reports of British companies contacting the government saying they can both manufacture the gowns and are keen to help, who are meeting an absolute wall of silence and never getting a reply.
It was highlighted again by the shadow Health Secretary on the BBC news tonight. I do wonder what's going on.

Put them in a brewery maybe they could organise that!

I am growing suspicious of the constant "we are following scientific advice" that is all very well, but supposing the scientists are wrong? But a handy get-out when an enquiry into all this when eventually it is over. "Not our fault such a mess as we followed scientific advice".     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2020, 03:00:53 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 19, 2020, 11:36:35 PM
Put them in a brewery maybe they could organise that!

I am growing suspicious of the constant "we are following scientific advice" that is all very well, but supposing the scientists are wrong? But a handy get-out when an enquiry into all this when eventually it is over. "Not our fault such a mess as we followed scientific advice".   
+1

One newspaper today stated:

'Pubs to be closed until Christmas' !!! :o >:D  :'(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 20, 2020, 03:18:09 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 19, 2020, 11:08:10 PM
The lack of PPE for doctors, nurses, and carers is a national disgrace. It's like when the Russian Army in World War One were sent into battle without rifles ('pick one up from a fallen comrade') and in some cases without boots on their feet. The govt's increasingly unconvincing attempt to distance themselves from blame is transparent for all to see.

Indeed. When the NHS were quite literally there for the government, pulling Boris Johnson through his scrape with Covid 19, it is even more galling to see how pathetically they have been repaid. Why for example are British companies not enthusiastically being taken up on their offer of provision of more desperately needed PPE? Is it incompetence, power battles in the wake of Johnson's temporary back seat status? It's a mystery and a complete injustice to those on the frontline facing this frightening virus.

And on the subject of front lines, your analogy with Russian soldiers in WWI is a very telling one!


Quote from: Irons on April 19, 2020, 11:36:35 PM
Put them in a brewery maybe they could organise that!

Optimistic!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 20, 2020, 03:31:33 AM
It has caused a lot of debate here, when the leading figure from the state's scientific authorities, Kåre Mølbak, yesterday said that unfortunately, the social distancing procedures must likely be continued for a whole year, until a vaccine will be available generally. That is, well into 2021.

If taken literally, this would also imply the continued, strong measures at various institutions and in society life, obviously having deep impact on people's social and mental life. It might be possible to think creatively to develop better ways of social life without the risks.

As regards the Oxford University talks about a possible vaccine in September, the likelihood of which is said to be 80% by professor Gilbert, doubts were also expressed about the speed that a huge, yet qualified production will take; this will add considerably to the time span.

Danish authorities are monitoring results from 12 selected vaccine projects globally; besides those, around 30 further, serious projects also exist.
The 12 selected projects are:

1. USA: scientists from Cambridge and the biotech company Moderna Therapeutics. Are testing healthy adults. Tests expected to be done in June 2021.

2. + 3. China, the vaccine company CanSino Biologics. Are testing healthy adults. Some test results expected to be ready in late January 2021.

4. USA: Inovio Pharmaceuticals. Testing healthy adults until November 2020. Unknown finalizing.

5. Canada: Symvivo Corporation, a cancer therapy specialist. Testing healthy adults until August 2021.

6. Australia: Murdoch Children's Research Institute, tuberculosis experts testing 4170 health sector employees. Last injection in October 2020. Unknown finalizing.

7. + 8. Netherlands and Germany. Tuberculosis scientists. Testing people in the Netherlands, Germany and India. Unknown finalizing.

9. Great Britain, Oxford University. Tests of volunteers between the ages 18-55, expected until May 2021.

10. USA: University of Alabama, testing of a vaccine that will be given through the nose. Finalizing unknown.

11. + 12. China, Guangdong. Scientists specializing in blood cells testing vaccines in two projects. Finalizing expected in December 2024.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 20, 2020, 03:48:55 AM
There are actually more. The WHO keeps a list as well, though I am not sure how often they update it.
https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/Novel-Coronavirus_Landscape_nCoV-4april2020.pdf?ua=1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 20, 2020, 04:07:17 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 20, 2020, 03:00:53 AM
+1

One newspaper today stated:

'Pubs to be closed until Christmas' !!! :o >:D  :'(

I wonder what think think is going to happen at Christmas which will make it possible for them to open. My feeling is that pubs and restaurants will be closed for a couple of years. Even in Sweden!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 20, 2020, 04:16:52 AM
  Thanks for the useful link. Yes, it currently lists around 60 projects world-wide. And it's good that there's a general openness in these matters.

  I've noticed that some of our leading scientists certainly aren't by definition up-to-date, when they make their statements, compared to the most recent, but serious media reports and problematizings. For example, some of them may speak about future, naturally gained immunity - without mentioning that some information points to that this is no longer considered guaranteed, also by the WHO.

  Obviously though, those people are also very busy with their own, daily work procedures, and they might not have sufficient information about media stories and staff to tell about international news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 20, 2020, 04:32:17 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 20, 2020, 04:07:17 AM
I wonder what they think is going to happen at Christmas which will make it possible for them to open. My feeling is that pubs and restaurants will be closed for a couple of years. Even in Sweden!

They are still open in Sweden these days, but 'social distancing' must take place at them, it is said.

Swedish press reports that rich foreigners now buy expensive air tickets to sample the Good Life there, during weekend breaks etc. But also, that they might bring virus back and forth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on April 20, 2020, 04:52:40 AM
Coronavirus: 38 days when Britain sleepwalked into disaster (https://archive.is/20200418182037/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/coronavirus-38-days-when-britain-sleepwalked-into-disaster-hq3b9tlgh)

"Boris Johnson skipped five Cobra meetings on the virus, calls to order protective gear were ignored and scientists' warnings fell on deaf ears. Failings in February may have cost thousands of lives."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 04:59:27 AM
Reports suggest many have had coronavirus with no symptoms
By Marilynn Marchione Associated Press,Updated April 20, 2020

A flood of new research suggests that far more people have had the coronavirus without any symptoms, fueling hope that it will turn out to be much less lethal than originally feared.

While that's clearly good news, it also means it's impossible to know who around you may be contagious. That complicates decisions about returning to work, school and normal life.

In the last week, reports of silent infections have come from a homeless shelter in Boston, a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, pregnant women at a New York hospital, several European countries and California.

The head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says 25% of infected people might not have symptoms. The vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. John Hyten, thinks it may be as high as 60% to 70% among military personnel.

None of these numbers can be fully trusted because they're based on flawed and inadequate testing, said Dr. Michael Mina of Harvard's School of Public Health.

Collectively, though, they suggest "we have just been off the mark by huge, huge numbers" for estimating total infections, he said.

Worldwide, more than 2.3 million infections and more than 160,000 deaths have been confirmed. The virus has caused nearly unprecedented economic and social harm since its existence was reported in early January.

Based on known cases, health officials have said the virus usually causes mild or moderate flu-like illness. Now evidence is growing that a substantial number of people may have no symptoms at all.

Scientists in Iceland screened 6% of its population to see how many had previously undetected infections and found that about 0.7% tested positive. So did 13% of a group at higher risk because of recent travel or exposure to someone sick.

Aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, where one crew member died from the virus, "the rough numbers are that 40 percent are symptomatic," said Vice Adm. Phillip Sawyer, deputy commander of naval operations. The ratio may change if more develop symptoms later, he warned.

In New York, a hospital tested all pregnant women coming in to deliver over a two-week period. Nearly 14% of those who arrived with no symptoms of coronavirus turned out to have it. Of the 33 positive cases, 29 had no symptoms when tested, although some developed them later.

Previously, tests on passengers and crew from the Diamond Princess cruise ship found nearly half who tested positive had no symptoms at the time. Researchers estimate that 18% of infected people never developed any.

These studies used tests that look for bits of the virus from throat and nose swabs, which can miss cases. Someone can test negative one day if there's not much virus to detect and then positive the next.

Symptoms also may not appear when someone is tested but turn up later. One Japanese study found more than half of those who had no symptoms when they tested positive later felt sick.

Better answers may come from newer tests that check blood for antibodies, substances the immune system makes to fight the virus. But the accuracy of these, too, is still to be determined.

On Friday, researchers reported results from antibody tests on 3,300 people in California's Santa Clara county: Between 1.5% and 2.8% have been infected, they claimed. That would mean 48,000 to 81,000 cases in the county — more than 50 times the number that have been confirmed.

The work has not been formally published or reviewed, but some scientists were quick to question it. Participants were recruited through Facebook ads, which would attract many people likely to be positive who have had symptoms and want to know if the coronavirus was the reason. Some neighborhoods also had way more participants than others, and "hot spots" within the county might have made infections seem more common than they are elsewhere.

Ships, maternity wards and single counties also don't provide data that can be used to generalize about what's happening elsewhere. And many of the figures have come from snapshots, not research on wide populations over time.

Antibody testing in particular needs to be done "in an unbiased approach" on groups of people that are representative of the geographic, social, racial and other conditions, Mina said.

The CDC and other groups plan such studies, and they could guide public health advice on returning to normal life for people in certain areas.

If infections are more widespread than previously understood, it's possible that more people have developed some level of immunity to the virus. That could stifle the spread through what's called herd immunity, but scientists caution that there is still much to learn about whether mild illnesses confer immunity and how long it might last.

It will probably be months before enough reliable testing has been done to answer those questions and others, including how widespread infections have been and the virus's true mortality rate, which has only been estimated so far.

"If they've all seen the virus before, then maybe you can relax in that neighborhood" and ease social distancing, Mina said. "We're not anywhere close where we need to be" on antibody testing to do that yet, he said.


AP writers Mike Stobbe in New York and Robert Burns and Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 20, 2020, 05:19:53 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 20, 2020, 04:52:40 AM
Coronavirus: 38 days when Britain sleepwalked into disaster (https://archive.is/20200418182037/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/coronavirus-38-days-when-britain-sleepwalked-into-disaster-hq3b9tlgh)

"Boris Johnson skipped five Cobra meetings on the virus, calls to order protective gear were ignored and scientists' warnings fell on deaf ears. Failings in February may have cost thousands of lives."

What a nightmare. Prime Minister Johnson does not want to work on weekends, he's busy with snuggly days off with his pregnant fiancee, and is consumed with negotiations with his ex. And finally, because he never stopped shaking hands with every person he meets, he contracts the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 20, 2020, 06:22:32 AM
Best editorial I have seen so far: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/04/18/sally-jenkins-trump-coronavirus-testing-economy/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 20, 2020, 07:06:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 20, 2020, 04:32:17 AM
They are still open in Sweden these days, but 'social distancing' must take place at them, it is said.

Swedish press reports that rich foreigners now buy expensive air tickets to sample the Good Life there, during weekend breaks etc. But also, that they might bring virus back and forth.

I saw an interesting thing with a Swedish health expert where he talked about how the Swedes have managed to more or less control the disease without strong confinement legislation, because the people trust the government and so are more or less compliant - only restaurants proved too great a challenge, he said, and he expressed a hope that they'd be closed.

This is a far cry from Southern Europe. In France, the relation between people and government is full of distrust and contempt as far as I can see. In the UK we're maybe somewhere between France and Sweden.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 20, 2020, 07:19:48 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 20, 2020, 05:19:53 AM
What a nightmare. Prime Minister Johnson does not want to work on weekends, he's busy with snuggly days off with his pregnant fiancee, and is consumed with negotiations with his ex. And finally, because he never stopped shaking hands with every person he meets, he contracts the virus.

Fair play you know a lot more of the PM's private life then I do - not that I am a least bit interested.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 20, 2020, 07:40:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 20, 2020, 07:06:31 AM
I saw an interesting thing with a Swedish health expert where he talked about how the Swedes have managed to more or less control the disease without strong confinement legislation, because the people trust the government and so are more or less compliant - only restaurants proved too great a challenge, he said, and he expressed a hope that they'd be closed.

This is a far cry from Southern Europe. In France, the relation between people and government is full of distrust and contempt as far as I can see. In the UK we're maybe somewhere between France and Sweden.

We are, but it is a fine line. I believe the rules are more draconian in Spain and France. The Brits have mainly followed the rules out of self-preservation (much to the surprise of the powers to be) but it would not take a lot for it all to kick off. There is talk of the over 70's, of which I am one, continuing the lockdown for a further 18 months, with a lifting of restrictions for the rest. That will not go down at all well. If the government think, for example at Christmas, the oldies will miss out seeing their family, then they need to think again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 20, 2020, 07:51:44 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 20, 2020, 07:19:48 AM
Fair play you know a lot more of the PM's private life then I do - not that I am a least bit interested.

The snuggly weekends etc were in the London Times article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 20, 2020, 09:29:11 AM
Quote from: Rinaldo on April 20, 2020, 04:52:40 AM
Coronavirus: 38 days when Britain sleepwalked into disaster (https://archive.is/20200418182037/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/coronavirus-38-days-when-britain-sleepwalked-into-disaster-hq3b9tlgh)

"Boris Johnson skipped five Cobra meetings on the virus, calls to order protective gear were ignored and scientists' warnings fell on deaf ears. Failings in February may have cost thousands of lives."

Downing Street's press release (last paragraph) is the kind of stuff we're likely to hear in the coming weeks throughout the world's capitals... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 20, 2020, 09:53:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 20, 2020, 07:06:31 AM
I saw an interesting thing with a Swedish health expert where he talked about how the Swedes have managed to more or less control the disease without strong confinement legislation, because the people trust the government and so are more or less compliant - only restaurants proved too great a challenge, he said, and he expressed a hope that they'd be closed.

This is a far cry from Southern Europe. In France, the relation between people and government is full of distrust and contempt as far as I can see. In the UK we're maybe somewhere between France and Sweden.

Their relative number of fatalities is much bigger than the rest of Scandinavia and Germany, doubling them at least, or more.
There's been major problems at retirement homes also.

Some people think that within months, Sweden will then have fewer fatalities than their neighbours, however - due to the 'herd policy'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 20, 2020, 02:29:33 PM
Quote from: Iota on April 20, 2020, 03:18:09 AM
Indeed. When the NHS were quite literally there for the government, pulling Boris Johnson through his scrape with Covid 19, it is even more galling to see how pathetically they have been repaid. Why for example are British companies not enthusiastically being taken up on their offer of provision of more desperately needed PPE? Is it incompetence, power battles in the wake of Johnson's temporary back seat status? It's a mystery and a complete injustice to those on the frontline facing this frightening virus.

And on the subject of front lines, your analogy with Russian soldiers in WWI is a very telling one!


Optimistic!
Are not businesses in the UK able to help make things?  And/or individuals?  In the States, 'even' high schoolers who can make things (like those plastic face shields via a 3D printer).   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 20, 2020, 02:36:03 PM
Quote from: Daverz on April 19, 2020, 06:34:47 PM
A pandemic necessarily requires our response as a polity.  I can't think of anything more political, except perhaps climate change.  I suppose we could talk about policy only in the abstract, but that strikes me as a kind of weird kabuki theater to engage in as people die around us.
What I think is wrong though and what I was responding to is being unkind/rude to other persons on this forum.  Yes, it's fine and certainly fair and right to disagree and certainly is and should be allowed, but doing one's best to be polite and kind to other people does matter to me.

Best wishes,

PD

Edit:  Am I alone in this?  I hope not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 20, 2020, 03:32:54 PM
The mainstream is catching on sloooooooooooowly that there is a strong possibility that the origins are from the lab (accidental leak). There was also a recent Washington Post article about that. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V60ABj75-FQ

I also heard from somewhere (don't remember where it was) that the people in the area of the market were interviewed and mentioned that it wasn't even selling bat meat at the time.

Well, I'll try to remain uncritical of the slowness and be glad at least they are starting to focus on this. As long as they don't blindly follow the official CCP narrative but instead consider other likely causes then that is a good thing, since we all know just about everything that comes from the CCP is a lie.

And what's funny is asking the people that worked in the lab directly- now who in the world would openly admit to that? Of course they aren't going to admit their lack of following safety protocol is the root cause of over 100,000 people dying and crashing the world economy.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 03:41:36 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 20, 2020, 02:36:03 PM
  What I think is wrong though and what I was responding to is being unkind/rude to other persons on this forum.  Yes, it's fine and certainly fair and right to disagree and certainly is and should be allowed, but doing one's best to be polite and kind to other people does matter to me.

Best wishes,

PD

Edit:  Am I alone in this?  I hope not.

You are not alone in this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 03:44:18 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 03:41:36 PM
You are not alone in this.

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 04:59:56 PM
Quote from: greg on April 20, 2020, 03:32:54 PM
The mainstream is catching on sloooooooooooowly that there is a strong possibility that the origins are from the lab (accidental leak). There was also a recent Washington Post article about that. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V60ABj75-FQ

I also heard from somewhere (don't remember where it was) that the people in the area of the market were interviewed and mentioned that it wasn't even selling bat meat at the time.

Well, I'll try to remain uncritical of the slowness and be glad at least they are starting to focus on this. As long as they don't blindly follow the official CCP narrative but instead consider other likely causes then that is a good thing, since we all know just about everything that comes from the CCP is a lie.

And what's funny is asking the people that worked in the lab directly- now who in the world would openly admit to that? Of course they aren't going to admit their lack of following safety protocol is the root cause of over 100,000 people dying and crashing the world economy.  :D

Not sure how to respond to this post politely. So I'll just ask: what Washington Post article? Are you referring to this?:

What caused the coronavirus? A skeptical take on the theories about the outbreak's Chinese origin. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/04/16/what-caused-coronavirus-skeptical-take-theories-about-outbreaks-chinese-origin/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 05:11:22 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 04:59:56 PM
Not sure how to respond to this post politely. So I'll just ask: what Washington Post article? Are you referring to this?:

What caused the coronavirus? A skeptical take on the theories about the outbreak's Chinese origin. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/04/16/what-caused-coronavirus-skeptical-take-theories-about-outbreaks-chinese-origin/)

"There is no evidence of escape from a lab," Andrew Rambaut, a microbiologist at the University of Edinburgh, wrote in an email. "The virus is just like a virus we would expect to see in wild bat populations, similar viruses have jumped from non-human animals to animals in the past, so I see no reason to speculate about this any further."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 05:13:17 PM
Greg, why is that utterly unsupported conspiracy theory so dear to you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 05:17:11 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 04:59:56 PM
Not sure how to respond to this post politely. So I'll just ask: what Washington Post article? Are you referring to this?:

What caused the coronavirus? A skeptical take on the theories about the outbreak's Chinese origin. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/04/16/what-caused-coronavirus-skeptical-take-theories-about-outbreaks-chinese-origin/)

I saw a report on my local news (but actually originated with the network, NBC) which was a bit less skepticism about what that Post story calls Theory 2, pointed out that several articles that had appeared on the Virology Institute's website have been taken offline, and ended with the suggestion that if China wanted to restore trust, an international inquiry was needed. The segment includes a clip of a spokesman for the lab assuring an interviewer that no one connected to the lab had contracted the virus. His statement was so categorical and expansive and improbable (unless the lab staffs live in total isolation from everyone else in Wuhan) that it had to be false. I have to guess that the Chinese are so afraid of blame they don't want to let out even the smallest bit of evidence in its favor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 05:23:29 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 20, 2020, 05:11:22 PM
"There is no evidence of escape from a lab," Andrew Rambaut, a microbiologist at the University of Edinburgh, wrote in an email. "The virus is just like a virus we would expect to see in wild bat populations, similar viruses have jumped from non-human animals to animals in the past, so I see no reason to speculate about this any further."

Karl, may I point out that quote was regarding the idea that it was a human-engineered virus being developed as a bioweapon?  The idea now being pushed is that it was a natural bat virus which infected a human working at the lab.  Which actually is not much different from the "official" version it originated in a wet market.  Just transfers the setting to a more technological, more 21st century location.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 20, 2020, 05:36:38 PM
Apparently we have to expect that more and more viruses will jump from animals to humans - sometimes after a contact with a more 'human friendly' transitory host. There are many reasons to believe it's only a matter of time before other pandemics hit in a similar fashion to the covid-19.

As we invade and modify their natural habitat, animals get ever closer to humans. « New » viruses that have been living happily alone for hundreds and thousands of years will find their way to populated areas through contact with animals like bats, rodents, hens or hogs. Hopefully this whole coronavirus episode will go away when a vaccine is developed, but lessons will have to be learned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 05:40:15 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 05:23:29 PM
Karl, may I point out that quote was regarding the idea that it was a human-engineered virus being developed as a bioweapon?  The idea now being pushed is that it was a natural bat virus which infected a human working at the lab.  Which actually is not much different from the "official" version it originated in a wet market.  Just transfers the setting to a more technological, more 21st century location.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 20, 2020, 05:48:26 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 05:23:29 PM
Karl, may I point out that quote was regarding the idea that it was a human-engineered virus being developed as a bioweapon?  The idea now being pushed is that it was a natural bat virus which infected a human working at the lab.  Which actually is not much different from the "official" version it originated in a wet market.  Just transfers the setting to a more technological, more 21st century location.
Exactly. This has nothing to do with the man-made theory. I don't think people are understanding this for some reason.

That quote is from the microbiologist doesn't even make sense because the second part of the quote doesn't at all disprove the first part at all- the idea is that both happened. So sounds like that dude didn't get it, either? (Or maybe it's just undecipherable out of context?)



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 05:53:59 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 05:17:11 PM
I saw a report on my local news (but actually originated with the network, NBC) which was a bit less skepticism about what that Post story calls Theory 2, pointed out that several articles that had appeared on the Virology Institute's website have been taken offline, and ended with the suggestion that if China wanted to restore trust, an international inquiry was needed. The segment includes a clip of a spokesman for the lab assuring an interviewer that no one connected to the lab had contracted the virus. His statement was so categorical and expansive and improbable (unless the lab staffs live in total isolation from everyone else in Wuhan) that it had to be false. I have to guess that the Chinese are so afraid of blame they don't want to let out even the smallest bit of evidence in its favor.

Saying just that articles have been taken down is usefully vague for a conspiracy theory, just as it was in the last one greg posted. To know they were taken down - and are in some way relevant - should mean that they're able to tell us the contents and conclusions of them. So why aren't they doing that in conveying us this "news"? Why don't they post the printouts they should have made?

Also wrt the change from deliberate lab thing to accidental lab thing: I can't respect the a position that says the first conspiracy theory I was certain of may have been wrong, but this new conspiracy theory I'm equally certain of is definitely right. I'll be following the global scientific consensus, and they're all still saying its most probably the market scenario.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on April 20, 2020, 05:59:49 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 19, 2020, 09:39:52 PM
... whether US protests against lockdowns are the result of well-informed critique.

This goes back a couple of pages, and I'm sorry to resurrect political issues again (especially since I generally avoid the political stuff here on GMG), but I can GUARANTEE you that U.S. protests against lockdowns are NOT the result of well-informed critique. These protesters are Tea Party types (if you're familiar with that terminology), among the most reactionary, ill-informed, superstitious, mean-spirited citizens we can "boast." And, like all such protests, they pretend to be spontaneous, grassroots responses - when in fact they're organized and funded by far-right coalitions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:03:31 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 05:53:59 PM
Saying just that articles have been taken down is usefully vague for a conspiracy theory, just as it was in the last one greg posted. To know they were taken down - and are in some way relevant - should mean that they're able to tell us the contents and conclusions of them. So why aren't they doing that in conveying us this "news"? Why don't they post the printouts they should have made?

Also wrt the change from deliberate lab thing to accidental lab thing: I can't respect the a position that says the first conspiracy theory I was certain of may have been wrong, but this new conspiracy theory I'm equally certain of is definitely right. I'll be following the global scientific consensus, and they're all still saying its most probably the market scenario.

If the articles were removed from the web site, that's evidence of Chinese obfuscation. The question is simply, what are they obfuscating.

And as I pointed out in my prior comment, the theory simply means the point of transmission was a different location in Wuhan, nothing more. It still presumes a natural bat virus was unintentionally transmitted to a human.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:05:43 PM
Quote from: Alek Hidell on April 20, 2020, 05:59:49 PM
This goes back a couple of pages, and I'm sorry to resurrect political issues again (especially since I generally avoid the political stuff here on GMG), but I can GUARANTEE you that U.S. protests against lockdowns are NOT the result of well-informed critique. These protesters are Tea Party types (if you're familiar with that terminology), among the most reactionary, ill-informed, superstitious, mean-spirited citizens we can "boast." And, like all such protests, they pretend to be spontaneous, grassroots responses - when in fact they're organized and funded by far-right coalitions.

Exactly. For many of these people, the fact that a person has expertise in a field is a reason to disbelieve them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 20, 2020, 06:08:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 05:53:59 PM
Saying just that articles have been taken down is usefully vague for a conspiracy theory, just as it was in the last one greg posted. To know they were taken down - and are in some way relevant - should mean that they're able to tell us the contents and conclusions of them. So why aren't they doing that in conveying us this "news"? Why don't they post the printouts they should have made?
Maybe, because, you know, the CCP likes to take stuff down that they don't like.

Like the free internet. Or Winnie the Pooh. I guess if you want to broaden the definition of conspiracy, then they are, too.


Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 05:53:59 PM
I'll be following the global scientific consensus, and they're all still saying its most probably the market scenario.
Where even is the consensus on the new lab theory? Probably doesn't exist yet.

Why? Because the "official" story is all they will be asked about so far. China says wet market, scientists are asked about that, they say it's likely (because it is), convenient diversion possibly successful. Nothing asked about bad lab safety practices while they were studying the bats at the same time the outbreak started.

It's consensus because it makes sense. But it's not the only possibility that can make just as much sense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2020, 06:16:06 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:03:31 PM
If the articles were removed from the web site, that's evidence of Chinese obfuscation. The question is simply, what are they obfuscating.

And as I pointed out in my prior comment, the theory simply means the point of transmission was a different location in Wuhan, nothing more. It still presumes a natural bat virus was unintentionally transmitted to a human.

Check.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:33:14 PM
In reference to Alek's point

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/seeing-the-open-the-economy-protests-in-their-proper-light

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/19/pro-gun-activists-using-facebook-groups-push-anti-quarantine-protests/

H/T to Karl and Milos
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 20, 2020, 06:35:58 PM
Any lab can have individuals that in some occasion or habitually fail to follow proper procedure. The first batch of CDC tests was ineffective and reports say it was because correct procedures were not followed in preparing the reagents. However, the novel coronavirus was initially thought to be transmissible only from animals to humans because the initial patients all had a connection to the wet market (and because of wishful thinking). The new theory about the lab source is more complicated and doesn't fit the data as well. You can't say it is impossible, but Occam's razor would make it an unlikely explanation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:55:27 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 20, 2020, 06:35:58 PM
Any lab can have individuals that in some occasion or habitually fail to follow proper procedure. The first batch of CDC tests was ineffective and reports say it was because correct procedures were not followed in preparing the reagents. However, the novel coronavirus was initially thought to be transmissible only from animals to humans because the initial patients all had a connection to the wet market (and because of wishful thinking). The new theory about the lab source is more complicated and doesn't fit the data as well. You can't say it is impossible, but Occam's razor would make it an unlikely explanation.

I think the lab theory assumes the Chinese (most likely the local officials) lied about the identity of Patient Zero. Probably unprovable at this point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 07:06:40 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:03:31 PM
If the articles were removed from the web site, that's evidence of Chinese obfuscation. The question is simply, what are they obfuscating.


Well yes. I'm aware that the Chinese government suppresses information and is trying to control the narrative. I was referring more specifically to the shortcomings and tone of that reporting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 20, 2020, 08:04:21 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 07:06:40 PM
Well yes. I'm aware that the Chinese government suppresses information and is trying to control the narrative. I was referring more specifically to the shortcomings and tone of that reporting.

JBS is Just Asking Questions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 20, 2020, 08:28:38 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 20, 2020, 02:36:03 PM
  What I think is wrong though and what I was responding to is being unkind/rude to other persons on this forum.  Yes, it's fine and certainly fair and right to disagree and certainly is and should be allowed, but doing one's best to be polite and kind to other people does matter to me.

Best wishes,

PD

Edit:  Am I alone in this?  I hope not.

I haven't been paying close attention.  I'm more worried about the disinformation being posted and some failure to exercise some basic critical thinking skills.  Any CV-19 thread is likely to turn into a shitshow, I suppose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 08:40:15 PM
some local news I'm reading for the first time in the Guardian:

New Zealanders donate $230,000 to help zoo feed animals during Covid-19 crisis
Orana Wildlife Park appealed for help after struggling to pay weekly food bills, including gorillas' $800 vegetable bill (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/21/new-zealanders-donate-230000-to-help-zoo-orana-wildlife-park-feed-animals-during-covid-19-crisis)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2020, 09:41:18 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 03:41:36 PM
You are not alone in this.
+2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 20, 2020, 10:27:26 PM
This whole "the Chinese let the virus escape from their labs and then lied about it" conspiracy theory is a familiar diversion device from the Trump-loyal right.

If you're looking for people who deliberatley lied about the dangers of the virus and tried to obfuscate evidence, you don't have to look far. You're looking at the president of the USA who was talking about "fifteen cases" going back to zero as soon as the virus would "miraculously" (frantic hand gestures) go away.

On Fox figures like Hannity and Pirro have been spending a lot of time pushing the 'China did it deliberately' narrative passionately and their loyal viewers (i.e. easily excited low-info folks) are left with a lot of conflicting information, and in such a situation Blaming Strangers is the easy way out. Strangers can either be the Chinese, or even USA Librals  -  because after all this is about one thing only: Trump's reelection.
Even relatively well-informed people go down this route, just to let off steam. On GMG's former sister site RMCR the usual right wing cranks are still talking about "the Chinese virus" and defending this appelation.

Trump himself is in a strange situation, since he wants to be best buddies with Xi, but on the other hand he needs his fans to be foaming mouth angry with China, just to avoid them seeing the light and getting angry with who is really culpable here: Trump and his cronies. On a larger level all this talk about "punishing China" is silly; China owns 50% of the USA, just like Russia owns 25% of New York City (and 80% of Trump). If China were to dump all of its interests in the USA markets the USA would truly be a Third World country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 01:09:55 AM
https://www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats/sciences-prospective/coronavirus-moins-de-6-des-francais-infectes-selon-linstitut-pasteur-1196673

First the good news

QuoteCoronavirus : le nombre de nouvelles infections en forte baisse en France

Coronivirus: the number of new cases very much reduced in France

So lockdown works.

And the predictable bad news

QuoteMoins de 6 % de la population française infectée

Less than 6% of the French population has been infected.

So far from herd immunity in France. Lockdown is here to stay, with all the attendant economic consequences, unless something fundamentally changes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 21, 2020, 01:49:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 01:09:55 AM

And the predictable bad news

Less than 6% of the French population has been infected.

So far from herd immunity in France. Lockdown is here to stay, with all the attendant economic consequences, unless something fundamentally changes.

I believe the number was 3% in Da Netherlands. Of course there's very little testing done, but it looks like herd imm. does not work. It's too slow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 21, 2020, 02:36:08 AM
I know of a company in Central Europe  that had all its HQ personnel tested (some 30 people) and only two had Covid-19 antibodies and developed immunity. So yes, group immunity (I don't really like the term "herd" being applied to humans  ;)) seems slow indeed--even in this statitscally irrelevant sample. OTOH, the scoial distancing and workplace hygiene measures the company has implemented seem to be functioning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 21, 2020, 03:06:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 20, 2020, 02:29:33 PM
Are not businesses in the UK able to help make things?  And/or individuals?  In the States, 'even' high schoolers who can make things (like those plastic face shields via a 3D printer).   :(

Yes indeed, and I think some smaller institutions/care homes etc are sourcing locally for some of the equipment they need. The problem is the NHS requirements are huge, approaching 80,000 gowns/masks etc needed for each standard-sized hospital every day. So if you add that up for hospitals across the entire UK, the figures are eye watering, and each new day they're needed again! So coordination needs to be on a national scale and involve the government.

Another frustration for many is that there have been many reports that British businesses have been enthusiastically contacting the government saying they are able and keen to start manufacture of said PPE immediately, and are receiving absolutely no reply. I don't know why this is, bad management or some other reason, but bearing in mind the risks the NHS doctors workers are taking every day on our behalf, it is an utterly appalling and disgraceful situation that needs resolving right now, whatever that requires.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 03:18:21 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/opinion/coronavirus-testing-pneumonia.html

QuoteThese patients did not report any sensation of breathing problems, even though their chest X-rays showed diffuse pneumonia and their oxygen was below normal. How could this be?

We are just beginning to recognize that Covid pneumonia initially causes a form of oxygen deprivation we call "silent hypoxia" — "silent" because of its insidious, hard-to-detect nature.

A friend of mine who's a GP advised all his friends to by an oximeter. They cost very little on ebay (though they may have gone up of course!), so I got one. Reading this, I'm glad I did.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2020, 03:33:07 AM
Mass General models show flattening curve; COVID-19 patients not expected to overwhelm the system during this week's surge
Expect hospital admissions for coronavirus may begin to lower in about a week
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 05:08:28 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 21, 2020, 01:49:15 AM
I believe the number was 3% in Da Netherlands. Of course there's very little testing done, but it looks like herd imm. does not work. It's too slow.

3% in the Netherlands, 6% in France. Split the difference -- 4.5%

The population in the UK is 66.5M. So infected people in the UK is 4.5% of that.

2,970,000 people infected in the UK.

Let's say that there are 16,000 deaths so far in the UK --   Out of 2,970,000 infected, 16,000 have died.

So the mortality of COVID is about 0.5%

(Have I made a mistake?)


Bear in mind all the kerfuffle at the moment over care home deaths means that 16K is an underestimate (but, to be brutal, COVID has culled there -- sorry, I can't think of a more appropriate word for this tragedy.) It may be a one off.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 21, 2020, 05:28:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 05:08:28 AM
3% in the Netherlands, 6% in France. Split the difference -- 4.5%

The population in the UK is 66.5M. So infected people in the UK is 4.5% of that.

2,970,000 people infected in the UK.

Let's say that there are 16,000 deaths so far in the UK --   Out of 2,970,000 infected, 16,000 have died.

So the mortality of COVID is about 0.5%

(Have I made a mistake?)


Bear in mind all the kerfuffle at the moment over care home deaths means that 16K is an underestimate (but, to be brutal, COVID has culled there -- sorry, I can't think of a more appropriate word for this tragedy.) It may be a one off.

Fauci has stated that the mortality rate is probably around 1%.

If you do the numbers on a 3% infection rate in the Netherlands, which are 522.000 people, a mortality rate of 1% should result in 5.220 deaths. The official number of confirmed deaths (in hospitals) is now 3.916.
If you take into account 1.000 or more unconfirmed deaths in private homes and nursing homes, a mortality rate of around 1% sounds about right.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 21, 2020, 05:59:12 AM
Quote from: Daverz on April 20, 2020, 08:04:21 PM
JBS is Just Asking Questions.

The idea is has more rationality than you give it credit for.  The fact that Team Trump pushes a story so they can shift blame or distract does not mean the story is inherently misinformation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2020, 06:08:50 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 05:59:12 AM
The idea is has more rationality than you give it credit for.  The fact that Team Trump pushes a story so they can shift blame or distract does not mean the story is inherently misinformation.

A sound point;  the Stopped Clock, and all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on April 21, 2020, 06:47:14 AM
Part of me thinks the whole "launched in a lab" thing is designed for Fox News senior citizens whose main experience with infectious diseases is reading Stephen King's The Stand back in the 70's.   :laugh:

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/96/The_Stand_cover.jpg/220px-The_Stand_cover.jpg)

Don't get me wrong, it's a great book, one of my all-time faves, particularly as a young man; but it's not a medical journal, and Covid-19 is definitely not Captain Trips (thank goodness), nor is it going to bring about the end of civilization on the planet. 

Sheesh, every fool knows that doesn't happen until after the talking apes show up... get it together, people...

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/61/d0/e2/61d0e2044a59838daa6ff61ed76aa4b3.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 07:06:59 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 05:59:12 AM
The idea is has more rationality than you give it credit for.  The fact that Team Trump pushes a story so they can shift blame or distract does not mean the story is inherently misinformation.
Trump (or Trump fans) are pushing the lab escape theory? Never heard of this...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2020, 07:39:36 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 20, 2020, 08:40:15 PM
some local news I'm reading for the first time in the Guardian:

New Zealanders donate $230,000 to help zoo feed animals during Covid-19 crisis
Orana Wildlife Park appealed for help after struggling to pay weekly food bills, including gorillas' $800 vegetable bill (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/21/new-zealanders-donate-230000-to-help-zoo-orana-wildlife-park-feed-animals-during-covid-19-crisis)
I'm delighted to read that!  I believe that I had earlier provided a link to this article about a zoo in Germany.  I wonder whether or not they've received any help?  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52283658
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 21, 2020, 08:20:03 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 20, 2020, 06:55:27 PM
I think the lab theory assumes the Chinese (most likely the local officials) lied about the identity of Patient Zero. Probably unprovable at this point.

I think it is unlikely they have identified a patient zero. The disease is not that distinctive in its symptoms. What is distinctive is the rate at which it spreads and the likelihood of severe symptoms. What brought it to their attention was a cluster around the market, which was consistent with repeated animal-human transmission or one animal-human transmission followed by spreading among people at the market. Assuming it was the first case was wishful thinking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 08:45:04 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 21, 2020, 08:20:03 AM
I think it is unlikely they have identified a patient zero. The disease is not that distinctive in its symptoms. What is distinctive is the rate at which it spreads and the likelihood of severe symptoms. What brought it to their attention was a cluster around the market, which was consistent with repeated animal-human transmission or one animal-human transmission followed by spreading among people at the market. Assuming it was the first case was wishful thinking.
The only lead on any patient zero so far is Huang Yang Li, who was working with "bat lady" (Zhengli Shi) at the time on the bats while studying the coronavirus.

Her profile was taken off of the virology website and she's gone completely missing, and is suspected to be dead. Seems like if China wanted to take attention away from the lab origin theory then they could track her down and make her appear publicly, but it hasn't happened yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 21, 2020, 09:08:01 AM
Quote from: greg on April 21, 2020, 08:45:04 AM
The only lead on any patient zero so far is Huang Yang Li, who was working with "bat lady" (Zhengli Shi) at the time on the bats while studying the coronavirus.

Her profile was taken off of the virology website and she's gone completely missing, and is suspected to be dead. Seems like if China wanted to take attention away from the lab origin theory then they could track her down and make her appear publicly, but it hasn't happened yet.

That means nothing. She could have been one of the 50,000 people whom officials acknowledge as having the disease and of the 3800+ people whom they acknowledge as having died from it, and caught it in the normal way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 21, 2020, 09:39:35 AM
Based on my first hand experience with Communist officials, Communist statistics and Communist facts and figures, I don't trust the Chinese officials at all, not even when they say  "Hello, folks, it's a fine day today!" I think their numbers of confirmed cases and deaths are greatly understated. I think they covered up massively the whole bloody mess. I think they are ruthless villains. The scientifically unlikely event that this virus be intentionally man-made and spread would not surprise me at all. Yet I refuse to believe that even they can be that evil.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 09:53:12 AM
Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 09:08:01 AM
That means nothing. She could have been one of the 50,000 people whom officials acknowledge as having the disease and of the 3800+ people whom they acknowledge as having died from it, and caught it in the normal way.
There is no acknowledgement of her getting the disease... the officials at the lab said that no one got infected. Sure...

They also denied her existence at first but then said she left and was unaccounted for. How do these people work together and not even have each other's contact information? And why no obituary?

But I do see what you mean- it's all about the dates/timing. Not quite sure of the exact dates of the disappearance, just that the studies took place around November and December, so same general timeframe... but I guess her being patient zero completely relies on the lab origin theory being correct.

Also about the wet market, I heard that it was about 50 people who were interviewed and they couldn't confirm that they sold bats there...as well as the CDC unable to confirm it. So no leads there yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2020, 09:55:56 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 21, 2020, 09:39:35 AM
Based on my first hand experience with Communist officials, Communist statistics and Communist facts and figures, I don't trust the Chinese officials at all, not even when they say  "Hello, folks, it's a fine day today!" I think their numbers of confirmed cases and deaths are greatly understated. I think they covered up massively the whole bloody mess.


So you understand how painful it is to Americans that disinformation is the M.O. at the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 21, 2020, 10:01:59 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 21, 2020, 09:55:56 AM
So you understand how painful it is to Americans that disinformation is the M.O. at the White House.

I do. And I also understand how painful it must be for Mr. Fauci (whom I have watched interviewed live on CNN before the whole mess exploded in the uS, that is early March IIRC).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 21, 2020, 11:03:37 AM
Very good summary of the situation in the UK on Channel 4 tonight.

https://www.channel4.com/programmes/channel-4-news/on-demand
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 21, 2020, 11:09:23 AM
Quote from: greg on April 21, 2020, 09:53:12 AM
There is no acknowledgement of her getting the disease... the officials at the lab said that no one got infected. Sure...

They also denied her existence at first but then said she left and was unaccounted for. How do these people work together and not even have each other's contact information? And why no obituary?

But I do see what you mean- it's all about the dates/timing. Not quite sure of the exact dates of the disappearance, just that the studies took place around November and December, so same general timeframe... but I guess her being patient zero completely relies on the lab origin theory being correct.

Also about the wet market, I heard that it was about 50 people who were interviewed and they couldn't confirm that they sold bats there...as well as the CDC unable to confirm it. So no leads there yet.

I read an article (I won't be able to find it now) that CDC scientists reviewing the data think that the first cases were probably unnoticed and that the first infections were probably a lot earlier than December, possibly as early as September. The simplest and most likely explanation is that this mysterious person at the institute, if she is real and not an invention of conspiracy theorists, got sick in December or January with everyone else and the higher ups said "that's embarrassing, better taker her off the web site."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 21, 2020, 11:41:36 AM
More scientists here in Denmark saying that the herd immunity concept is an illusion, and that an average body's gained immunity towards the corona type viruses only tends to last for limited time, and even down to just one year.

The herd strategy, also costing more lives, is therefore wrong for several reasons, they say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2020, 11:44:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 21, 2020, 11:41:36 AM
More scientists here in Denmark saying that the herd immunity concept is an illusion, and that an average body's gained immunity towards the corona type viruses only tends to last for limited time, and even down to just one year.

The herd strategy, also costing more lives, is therefore wrong for several reasons, they say.

Ouch.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 12:07:24 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 21, 2020, 11:09:23 AM
I read an article (I won't be able to find it now) that CDC scientists reviewing the data think that the first cases were probably unnoticed and that the first infections were probably a lot earlier than December, possibly as early as September. The simplest and most likely explanation is that this mysterious person at the institute, if she is real and not an invention of conspiracy theorists, got sick in December or January with everyone else and the higher ups said "that's embarrassing, better taker her off the web site."
That is also possible.

"Embarassing" would be an odd reaction imo, but who really knows how they would react...

The official statement about her trying to deny the rumors were on February 16, so her death would have to be some time before then. The problem is that the information about her date of death or her current existence just isn't available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 21, 2020, 12:26:23 PM
Quote from: greg on April 21, 2020, 12:07:24 PM
That is also possible.

"Embarassing" would be an odd reaction imo, but who really knows how they would react...

Embarrassing as in "someone at our institute got it, and now they will claim it is our fault."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 12:37:14 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 21, 2020, 12:26:23 PM
Embarrassing as in "someone at our institute got it, and now they will claim it is our fault."
If that is the case then they horribly mishandled it because all you need to disprove it is a record of her date of death (to show that it is later than the earliest cases), and then they can go on living their life without people staying suspicious of them. I'm assuming such things are recorded there?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 21, 2020, 12:59:01 PM
Quote from: greg on April 21, 2020, 12:37:14 PM
If that is the case then they horribly mishandled it because all you need to disprove it is a record of her date of death (to show that it is later than the earliest cases), and then they can go on living their life without people staying suspicious of them. I'm assuming such things are recorded there?

That would not stop the conspiracy theories. They'd say the death certificate was doctored or something. And for all we know, she may have been among the early victims yet the wet market was the true source of the virus.

We know the local officials lied to lots of people trying to cover up the initial outbreak. The lab may have lied to officials  to protect itself,  and we will probably never know if they did. I suspect the national government itself isn't sure, and wants to make sure that no one will be able to find out for sure just to protect itself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 21, 2020, 01:13:13 PM
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html

Honest question... but do viruses often spread among animals, then to humans, only to have difficulty spreading back? Seems like reports of animal infections are rare. Since apparently no bats were sold at the market at that time, the pangolin theory is still valid. But hard to say since they weren't listed at the market due to them being illegal to sell, though doesn't mean they didn't anyways.


I see another article on the lab theory from today on the WSJ. Can't read it, but saw that it mentioned that the head of the lab is also "secretary of the lab's communist party committee" which I didn't know. This is the guy denying all the accusations btw.



Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 12:59:01 PM
We know the local officials lied to lots of people trying to cover up the initial outbreak. The lab may have lied to officials  to protect itself,  and we will probably never know if they did. I suspect the national government itself isn't sure, and wants to make sure that no one will be able to find out for sure just to protect itself.
(see previous paragraph)
Source:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-and-the-laboratories-in-wuhan-11587486996

I can only see the beginning part...

Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 12:59:01 PM
That would not stop the conspiracy theories. They'd say the death certificate was doctored or something. And for all we know, she may have been among the early victims yet the wet market was the true source of the virus..
Only at this point after this long would that be a suspicion. If they are counting number of deaths each day or week, they should have had her death accounted for and recorded within a short time period. This is a country which accounts for everyone due to the social credit system. Seems death records should be quick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2020, 01:26:59 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 21, 2020, 12:59:01 PM
That would not stop the conspiracy theories. They'd say the death certificate was doctored or something. And for all we know, she may have been among the early victims yet the wet market was the true source of the virus.

We know the local officials lied to lots of people trying to cover up the initial outbreak. The lab may have lied to officials  to protect itself,  and we will probably never know if they did. I suspect the national government itself isn't sure, and wants to make sure that no one will be able to find out for sure just to protect itself.

Truly, no facts can stop the conspiracy theories.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2020, 03:24:48 PM
Regarding pets:  A couple of weeks ago, I bumped into (not literally!) a nurse who works in respiratory care at a hospital.  He was out walking his dog and we chatted for a bit at a distance.  His dog wasn't on a leash, but he would call him occasionally to come back to him.  He suggested that I didn't pet him 'just in case'.

From what I read, it sounded like the lions and tigers that were infected will be o.k.  I certainly hope so.  They were supposedly infected by a zoo employee who was actively shedding the virus.  It sounded to me like he/she was feeling/doing o.k.

Update:  saw a story on t.v. about NYC mom-and-pop store break-ins up 120% since this all started.   :( >:(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on April 21, 2020, 03:35:58 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2020, 03:24:48 PM
Regarding pets:  A couple of weeks ago, I bumped into (not literally!) a nurse who works in respiratory care at a hospital.  He was out walking his dog and we chatted for a bit at a distance.  His dog wasn't on a leash, but he would call him occasionally to come back to him.  He suggested that I didn't pet him 'just in case'.

From what I read, it sounded like the lions and tigers that were infected will be o.k.  I certainly hope so.  They were supposedly infected by a zoo employee who was actively shedding the virus.  It sounded to me like he/she was feeling/doing o.k.

Update:  saw a story on t.v. about NYC mom-and-pop store break-ins up 120% since this all started.   :( >:(

PD

That's odd. Everywhere I've seen - the crime rate is down (in NYC and elsewhere).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2020, 04:37:29 PM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on April 21, 2020, 03:35:58 PM
That's odd. Everywhere I've seen - the crime rate is down (in NYC and elsewhere).
Hello,

I watched the segment again.  Here's the link to it.  And yes, from what I understood in the program that it was commercial break-ins that were on the rise.  I did catch them saying 'year-to-year' which I hadn't caught before.  They did make it seem like it was up in a number of areas (like San Francisco).  Here's the link to the story:  https://www.insideedition.com/media/videos/ferraras-bakery-in-new-york-city-is-burglarized-during-pandemic-59179  And yes, they did mention that overall the crime rate was down in NYC.  It did strike me whilst watching it, that with most shops, obviously being closed, that certain people would see that as prime time to break into smaller shops.  I do know of at least some shops in my area having some employees (or maybe just owners) going into their shops (perhaps for a limited time/days?) to mail out orders.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 21, 2020, 05:47:29 PM
In the Dominican Republic there is a curfew from 5:00pm until the morning. The aim is to curtail criminality (break-ins). People play cat and mouse with the police. So far 40000 arrests/detainments have been made.

https://dominicantoday.com/dr/covid-19/2020/04/13/video-people-violate-curfew-hide-when-the-police-arrive-then-reassemble-when-police-leave/ (https://dominicantoday.com/dr/covid-19/2020/04/13/video-people-violate-curfew-hide-when-the-police-arrive-then-reassemble-when-police-leave/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 21, 2020, 11:37:12 PM
Internationally, more than 500 teams are working on medicines for treatment. In Denmark, the first ones will be evaluated after tests within just 4 weeks from now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 21, 2020, 11:43:50 PM
In other news, the reports are that the chlorine-derivate that Trump was promoting almost on a daily basis does 1 not help against corona and 2 causes death by heart arhythmia (we already knew this) and 3 we already knew that he had a financial interest in the company producing the stuff.

There's your "I alone can fix this" president.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 21, 2020, 11:57:24 PM
Working at breakneck speed the first vaccine trials on humans this week.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52374653
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 01:52:31 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 21, 2020, 11:57:24 PM
Working at breakneck speed the first vaccine trials on humans this week.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52374653
Fingers are crossed here!

On another front, hard to believe that it's been 50 years:  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52370221
Be kind to your Mother....

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 02:27:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 08, 2020, 10:16:56 AM
I believe Spain has now started the long process of easing out of lockdown by allowing non essential workers back to work.

Is it my mistake, or are things starting to look a bit less well under control in Spain? I thought I heard on the news today that the death figures are going up again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 02:29:51 AM
I stumbled across this article this morning.  Hard to see how this virus has, yet again, caused harm.  I don't use a streaming service, but after reading this, I'm tempted to try one.  https://www.gimell.com/tallis-scholars-marathon-playlist
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 02:33:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 02:27:52 AM
Is it my mistake, or are things starting to look a bit less well under control in Spain? I thought I heard on the news today that the death figures are going up again.
I saw this article in the BBC news this morning saying that they were debating whether or not to extend the lockdown 'til mid-May.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-52377357
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 22, 2020, 03:12:40 AM
Pro-life conservatives: Open the country so the economy doesn't suffer more, because that's more important than your life.

When conservatives open their mouth, the irony level goes off the charts.  ::)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 22, 2020, 04:00:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 02:27:52 AM
Is it my mistake, or are things starting to look a bit less well under control in Spain? I thought I heard on the news today that the death figures are going up again.
The rate of daily new infections is steady at ca. 2.1 or 2.2%. The number of daily reported deaths fell to just below 400 about a week ago, but is now edging up to around 430 over the last couple of days. So, yes, the steady decline seen recently appears to have come to a halt (but nit in a very striking way). Also, the health system is no longer overstretched, and e.g several wings of the 5.000 bed (IIRC) makeshift hospital set up in  the Madrid fair and exhibition centre are no longer being used (but have not been dismantled completely just in case).

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 02:33:15 AM
I saw this article in the BBC news this morning saying that they were debating whether or not to extend the lockdown 'til mid-May.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-52377357

The lockdown in Spain is done following a constitutional mechanism called "state of alarm", which the government can invoke, but must be ratified by the parliament and only has a duration of 2 weeks. The prime minister is NIE in parliament as I write to get the next extension (until May 9th) approved. Although the political climate has deteriorated and become more hostile, it is expected that the extension of the state of alarm will pass through parliament with no problems.

What we did have until 10 days ago was a tightening of the restrictions (during 15 days)  beyond what the original state of alarm decree envisaged. I.e., all non-essential factories were told to stop operations, construction sites were closed, and so on, and the affected employees given a 2-week paid leave (which will be made up for via increased working hours when this all ends). So, the economy was put in "hibernation" (that's the term that was being used). Now we're back to the original measures: all shops (except food, pharmacies and other essentials) remain closed, as well as hotels, restaurants and bars, those who can work from home must do so, the rest may go to their workplace (factories, construction sites, car mechanics, cleaning personnel).

What they will (finally) allow  is for children under the age of 14 to take a daily stroll near their homes for for one hour with one parent (parks will remain closed, though). For almost 6 weeks now, children of any age were confined to their homes like anyone else, and couldn't even accompany their parents* when they went shopping.

* Only one parent, that is. Going out to shop in couples was (and remains) forbidden.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 04:37:22 AM
Thanks for the updates Ritter! 

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 04:59:48 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 22, 2020, 04:00:51 AM
The rate of daily new infections is steady at ca. 2.1 or 2.2%.



That's good. Maybe the increase in deaths are because of a large number of difficult cases appearing at the same time.

Quote from: ritter on April 22, 2020, 04:00:51 AM



For almost 6 weeks now, children of any age were confined to their homes like anyone else, and couldn't even accompany their parents* when they went shopping.


I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 22, 2020, 08:56:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 04:59:48 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 22, 2020, 04:00:51 AM

What they will (finally) allow  is for children under the age of 14 to take a daily stroll near their homes for for one hour with one parent (parks will remain closed, though). For almost 6 weeks now, children of any age were confined to their homes like anyone else, and couldn't even accompany their parents* when they went shopping.

* Only one parent, that is. Going out to shop in couples was (and remains) forbidden.
I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this.
You might have already seen this, and the lady is not Spanish, but she expresses what many Spanish parents can be feeling these days  ;D

https://www.youtube.com/v/0-nftLnl8H4
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2020, 09:00:17 AM
Sounds like The Onion, but ain't:

Texas state Governor Greg Abbott declared church services an "essential service" that may continue during the pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 22, 2020, 09:43:43 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 21, 2020, 11:41:36 AM
More scientists here in Denmark saying that the herd immunity concept is an illusion, and that an average body's gained immunity towards the corona type viruses only tends to last for limited time, and even down to just one year.

The herd strategy, also costing more lives, is therefore wrong for several reasons, they say.

From what I read, more and more reports tend to indicate an infection (contagion) rate of 3-5%, making it impossible to reach the level of contagion (estimated around 70%) that would result in herd immunity.

IOW relaxation of current confinement measures will cause new infections for which the population will not have developed immunity. Second and third waves of pandemic cannot be excluded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 22, 2020, 10:02:20 AM
Quote from: André on April 22, 2020, 09:43:43 AM
From what I read, more and more reports tend to indicate an infection (contagion) rate of 3-5%, making it impossible to reach the level of contagion (estimated around 70%) that would result in herd immunity.

IOW relaxation of current confinement measures will cause new infections for which the population will not have developed immunity. Second and third waves of pandemic cannot be excluded.

Yes, it's being debated & obviously as a layman, I can't say who's right, but there are several aspects to criticize, possibly reject the herd / immunity theories - such as

1) the body might just become immune for only a short period, even down to one year
2) calculations often result in, that getting the whole population into a first immunity stage would in reality take several years
3) the virus tends to mutate a lot and in that way possibly transcend immunity as well

One of the sources for this is a Danish professor at Oxford, Astrid Iversen.

You rarely hear this sort of critique regarding the official immunity or herd policies.

Sweden, working with their herd policy and very limited lock-down, is experiencing large numbers of fatalities now - the last two days it's been 5-6 times of Denmark's in relation to population size. Here's a Twitter thread critical of it
https://twitter.com/ianjamesparsley/status/1253006518657650690
but there's hardly any critique there.

The mentioned aspects might also become a problem regarding finding any truly effective vaccine, of course.
Therefore it seems obvious, I think, that reducing risks and finding the best possible treatment options are the best short-term policies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 22, 2020, 12:07:13 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 22, 2020, 03:12:40 AM
Pro-life conservatives: Open the country so the economy doesn't suffer more, because that's more important than your life.

When conservatives open their mouth, the irony level goes off the charts.  ::)

They never said it was more important than your own life. The fact is people are hurting financially and if certain stores follow CDC guidelines of social distancing, then they could make a little more money to live on even though it may be rather slow to begin with. But I guess people having money to live on so they won't starve to death means nothing to you. Oh wait, why should it, you're done with American politics, remember? ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 22, 2020, 12:21:04 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 22, 2020, 12:07:13 PM
They never said it was more important than your own life. The fact is people are hurting financially and if certain stores follow CDC guidelines of social distancing, then they could make a little more money to live on even though it may be rather slow to begin with. But I guess people having money to live on so they won't starve to death means nothing to you. Oh wait, why should it, you're done with American politics, remember? ::)
Also widespread financial devastation always leads to more suicides and lower quality of life (especially for younger people), so yeah, a well functioning economy is just as important since it literally is a matter of life and death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 22, 2020, 01:00:08 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 22, 2020, 12:07:13 PM
They never said it was more important than your own life. The fact is people are hurting financially and if certain stores follow CDC guidelines of social distancing, then they could make a little more money to live on even though it may be rather slow to begin with. But I guess people having money to live on so they won't starve to death means nothing to you. Oh wait, why should it, you're done with American politics, remember? ::)

I didn't comment on the policy of opening the businesses. I am totally aware of the need to do that is huge. I commented on the hypocrisy of being pro-life selectively. When it's about people dying from covid-19 conservatives are more pro-business than pro-life. When it's about capital punishments consevatives are not pro-life. However, if it is about unborn fetuses or zygots conservatives are very much pro-life!

What comes to people being hit by this pandemic, that's on Americans themselves. They have voted for right-wingers for decades and been happy with weak social safety nets. This is what happens when these safety nets are needed, but they don't exist. Countries with stronger social safety nets are in much better situation in this regard.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2020, 01:47:42 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 22, 2020, 01:00:08 PM


What comes to people being hit by this pandemic, that's on Americans themselves.

At times you are beneath contempt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 02:01:29 PM
The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change's report on relaxing lockdown. (unlockingdown?)

https://institute.global/sites/default/files/inline-files/A%20Sustainable%20Exit%20Strategy%2C%20Tony%20Blair%20Institute%20for%20Global%20Change.pdf

And a report which they refer to, which suggests letting young people (under 30) with no preexisting conditions return to work

https://www.andrewoswald.com/docs/newFinalCOVIDpaper-on-releasing-the-young-OswaldPowdthavee2020(1).pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2020, 02:26:42 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 22, 2020, 02:01:29 PM
The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change's report on relaxing lockdown. (unlockingdown?)

https://institute.global/sites/default/files/inline-files/A%20Sustainable%20Exit%20Strategy%2C%20Tony%20Blair%20Institute%20for%20Global%20Change.pdf

And a report which they refer to, which suggests letting young people (under 30) with no preexisting conditions return to work

https://www.andrewoswald.com/docs/newFinalCOVIDpaper-on-releasing-the-young-OswaldPowdthavee2020(1).pdf
I'll have to look at those reports.  Re the under 30:  I did hear the story of a supposedly healthy young man dying...didn't catch all of the story, but what came up was the possible implications of vaping and deaths.   :(

So much info to try and keep up with these days....and digest!  Trying to figure out what is going on in my own state....different stats presented during different news stories, so am trying to compare 'apples to apples'.  Will do more checking out later...

Just remembered an article on the BBC talking about political issues (possible grabs for power and also setbacks):  Hungary, Poland, Russia and Turkey which makes one think:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52308002

Best wishes to all,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 22, 2020, 02:31:47 PM
More bad news
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-blood/alarmed-as-covid-patients-blood-thickened-new-york-doctors-try-new-treatments-idUSKCN22421Z
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/16/blood-clots-coronavirus-tpa/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2020, 02:38:16 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 22, 2020, 02:31:47 PM
More bad news
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-blood/alarmed-as-covid-patients-blood-thickened-new-york-doctors-try-new-treatments-idUSKCN22421Z
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/16/blood-clots-coronavirus-tpa/

Was just reading a piece on this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 22, 2020, 03:36:15 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 22, 2020, 02:38:16 PM
Was just reading a piece on this.

This one?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/22/coronavirus-blood-clots/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/22/coronavirus-blood-clots/)

I read it today, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2020, 03:44:40 PM
Quote from: André on April 22, 2020, 03:36:15 PM
This one?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/22/coronavirus-blood-clots/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/22/coronavirus-blood-clots/)

I read it today, too.
Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2020, 05:10:46 PM
Yup!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 22, 2020, 05:20:42 PM
Trump is not usually this quick to throw people under the bus.  Hopefully the rest of the governors will notice this.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/22/politics/trump-pence-georgia-governor-brian-kemp/index.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 22, 2020, 05:41:38 PM
Another perfect phone call...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 22, 2020, 06:12:18 PM
'We hope to be a model': the California town testing every resident for coronavirus
Bolinas, north of San Francisco, aims to be the first US town to achieve the feat as it seeks to learn more about transmission (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/22/california-coronavirus-testing-bolinas)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: XB-70 Valkyrie on April 23, 2020, 12:05:02 AM
Hullo Bolinas

(https://img.discogs.com/QolFRb4AYtbrhBmaCtNBxsnS4vs=/fit-in/600x598/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-1126184-1196290791.jpeg.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 23, 2020, 01:55:38 AM
The impact of COVID on cancer.

https://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2020/04/21/how-coronavirus-is-impacting-cancer-services-in-the-uk/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 23, 2020, 01:58:36 AM
Quote from: XB-70 Valkyrie on April 23, 2020, 12:05:02 AM
Hullo Bolinas

(https://img.discogs.com/QolFRb4AYtbrhBmaCtNBxsnS4vs=/fit-in/600x598/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-1126184-1196290791.jpeg.jpg)

Chopin op 45 prelude rip off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 23, 2020, 04:40:40 AM
Las Vegas Mayor offers city as "control group", "we offer to be a control group" to see how many people die without social distancing.

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1253041723510587394

She makes me think of Eddie Izard

https://www.youtube.com/v/hSOrBqjrjRc
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 23, 2020, 04:48:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 23, 2020, 04:40:40 AM
Las Vegas Mayor offers city as "control group", "we offer to be a control group" to see how many people die without social distancing.

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1253041723510587394

She makes me think of Eddie Izard

https://www.youtube.com/v/hSOrBqjrjRc

what, did she have a referendum?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 23, 2020, 06:30:02 AM
Here's an interesting person from Miami

https://www.youtube.com/v/sHn0m9tyscE
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on April 23, 2020, 07:29:15 AM
^ ^ ^ It's satire, although, were it real, Jacksonville FL would be a likely place to find it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 08:08:22 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 22, 2020, 01:00:08 PMWhat comes to people being hit by this pandemic, that's on Americans themselves. They have voted for right-wingers for decades and been happy with weak social safety nets. This is what happens when these safety nets are needed, but they don't exist. Countries with stronger social safety nets are in much better situation in this regard.

Have you no decency whatsoever? How about saying something like you hope the United States is able to overcome this coronavirus pandemic? No, you would never say this, because I think you secretly have nothing but hatred for Americans and the United States. In the future, you will be ignored, because you're not even worth spitting on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 23, 2020, 10:10:34 AM
It's too soon to declare victory over coronavirus, expert says
By Martin Finucane Globe Staff,Updated April 22, 2020, 4:18 p.m.

People may be getting weary of being cooped up at home and heartened by reports of a flattening curve. But it's too soon to declare victory against the coronavirus pandemic, according to a Harvard epidemiology expert.

"I think that there are understandable anxieties, and obviously there are understandable different approaches to what people characterize as a lockdown," said William Hanage, a professor at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

But he said in a briefing Wednesday with reporters, "I think that we need to accept that we are in the early stages of a pandemic. ... I would like to emphasize the pandemic is only just getting started."

Hanage said some areas may seem to be moving past the peak of the surge, but said, "It's important to note that that decline is not, we believe, as a result of immunity to the virus, but rather as a consequence of the actions that we humans have been taking in order to try and stop new transmission chains being initiated."

"It's quite possible that cases are dropping ... but I think it's stretching credulity to suggest that means the pandemic is past," Hanage said.

He said that in order for the pandemic to be over, somewhere between 60 and 75 percent of the world's population would have to be infected, giving rise to herd immunity.

"We don't have evidence to think that that is what's happened during the initial surge," he said.

Hanage also emphasized that any plan to reopen the economy should have increased testing as a requirement.

"A prerequisite for moving forward needs to be the ability to detect if we have a surge building that is going to threaten health care. That means testing," he said. "If you get a new surge building and you don't detect it, then you could be in a very bad situation very quickly."

Hanage said if social distancing restrictions are dropped, the virus could make a comeback in the fall, or even as early as the summer.

"What we have to remember is that as we start changing things, the opportunity for future surges could be there," he said. "They definitely could happen."

Instead of dropping restrictions, he said, "We should be trying to figure out ways to refine what we're doing now," and trying to figure out the measures that are "most helpful and most sustainable" and have the largest effect.

"I really think it's extremely important that we manage to balance the response to this with economic activity, but I think that one of the things we've got to remember is we've got to keep a very close eye on it," he said.

"One of my major concerns at the moment is I'm detecting a sense among folks that this is coming to an end, whereas, actually, we're really just in the beginning," he said.

President Trump, who is anxious to reopen the economy, at a briefing later Wednesday downplayed the idea that the virus could see a resurgence, saying if it did "it's not going to be like it was. ... It's also possible it doesn't come back at all."

But his top experts disagreed. "There will be coronavirus in the fall," Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the federal government's top infectious disease expert, said as Trump looked on.

Fauci also said that "whether or not it's going to be big or small is going to depend on our response."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 23, 2020, 10:47:18 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 22, 2020, 10:02:20 AM
Yes, it's being debated & obviously as a layman, I can't say who's right, but there are several aspects to criticize, possibly reject the herd / immunity theories - such as

1) the body might just become immune for only a short period, even down to one year
2) calculations often result in, that getting the whole population into a first immunity stage would in reality take several years
3) the virus tends to mutate a lot and in that way possibly transcend immunity as well

Herd immunity is great if it comes from a vaccine. Herd immunity from getting this disease isn't a great option since, even taking into account incomplete testing, somewhere between 0.5% and 1% of people who get Covid-19 die. (In the U.S., 5% of confirmed cases are fatal, because testing is so sparse.) If 75% of the population constitutes herd immunity, that means up to 0.75% of the population will die. A few million people in the U.S.

Reports I've seen seem to indicate that the virus mutation rate is slow. There are a dozen strains floating around differing by one or two bases. That would not be an issue if there were a vaccine.

And, yes, it is an assumption that acquired immunity will be long term. Some viral infections result in long term immunity (like chicken pox) but others result in immunity that only lasts for months. I've seen reports that the Covid-19 virus infects and kills T-cells, which are one of the ways the human immune system retains long-term immunity. That's the most worrying factoid, I think. It could prevent a vaccine from working. That's my main worry, the implicit assumption that "things will go back to normal when there is a vaccine." There may never be an effective vaccine.




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 23, 2020, 10:53:14 AM
As countries open, close, reopen etc, bouts of epidemic will likely recur in the coming years. Immunity being currently unknown but estimated to be under 10%, that means that 90%+ of any given country is vulnerable to an eventual exposure to the virus. Unless that elusive vaccine materializes, we're in this for quite some time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 10:58:34 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 23, 2020, 10:47:18 AMAnd, yes, it is an assumption that acquired immunity will be long term. Some viral infections result in long term immunity (like chicken pox) but others result in immunity that only lasts for months. I've seen reports that the Covid-19 virus infects and kills T-cells, which are one of the ways the human immune system retains long-term immunity. That's the most worrying factoid, I think. It could prevent a vaccine from working. That's my main worry, the implicit assumption that "things will go back to normal when there is a vaccine." There may never be an effective vaccine.

This is the most worrying aspect of all of this --- a vaccine doesn't mean 100% success rate. This could be years in the making. If the reports you read are, indeed, factual, then this means this virus attacks the immune system like HIV does (i. e. the killing of T-cells). A most scary thought. One of the main differences is this coronavirus moves at a more rapid pace or so it seems right now. We have a long, long fight ahead of us and 'us' meaning the entire world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 23, 2020, 12:24:18 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 10:58:34 AM
This is the most worrying aspect of all of this --- a vaccine doesn't mean 100% success rate. This could be years in the making. If the reports you read are, indeed, factual, then this means this virus attacks the immune system like HIV does (i. e. the killing of T-cells). A most scary thought. One of the main differences is this coronavirus moves at a more rapid pace or so it seems right now. We have a long, long fight ahead of us and 'us' meaning the entire world.

No speedy recovery, alas!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 23, 2020, 12:44:22 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 10:58:34 AM
This is the most worrying aspect of all of this --- a vaccine doesn't mean 100% success rate. This could be years in the making. If the reports you read are, indeed, factual, then this means this virus attacks the immune system like HIV does (i. e. the killing of T-cells). A most scary thought. One of the main differences is this coronavirus moves at a more rapid pace or so it seems right now. We have a long, long fight ahead of us and 'us' meaning the entire world.

The T-cell result is also preliminary. The virus was found to infect but not reproduce in T-cells, in culture I think. The T-cells underwent apoptosis (programmed cell death) which is a self-defense mechanism. Not clear if this would be significant in actual infections.

I see a lot of wishful thinking, such-and-such is already starting a clinical trial of a vaccine, two dozen groups are developing a vaccine, such and such a drug has been tried in a clinic and the patients recovered, etc. There is the thought that this is so urgent that we should bypass the slow, methodical scientific procedure. What people don't get is that there is no shortcut for science. Science is the shortcut, faster than trying this and that based on anecdotal evidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 12:58:35 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 23, 2020, 12:24:18 PM
No speedy recovery, alas!

Indeed, not.

Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 23, 2020, 12:44:22 PM
The T-cell result is also preliminary. The virus was found to infect but not reproduce in T-cells, in culture I think. The T-cells underwent apoptosis (programmed cell death) which is a self-defense mechanism. Not clear if this would be significant in actual infections.

I see a lot of wishful thinking, such-and-such is already starting a clinical trial of a vaccine, two dozen groups are developing a vaccine, such and such a drug has been tried in a clinic and the patients recovered, etc. There is the thought that this is so urgent that we should bypass the slow, methodical scientific procedure. What people don't get is that there is no shortcut for science. Science is the shortcut, faster than trying this and that based on anecdotal evidence.

As long as one is developed and is clinically-proven to eliminate this virus 100% with no chances of recurrence is all we truly can hope for. Yes, there's no rushing science, but I have confidence that at some point we'll be able to get on with our lives. It's just the waiting game that is always worrying and the delays that, no doubt, will arise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 23, 2020, 01:15:55 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 12:58:35 PM
Indeed, not.

As long as one is developed and is clinically-proven to eliminate this virus 100% with no chances of recurrence is all we truly can hope for. Yes, there's no rushing science, but I have confidence that at some point we'll be able to get on with our lives. It's just the waiting game that is always worrying and the delays that, no doubt, will arise.

I agree with you and nice to see you back here John.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 05:03:23 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 23, 2020, 01:15:55 PM
I agree with you and nice to see you back here John.

It's nice to you as well, Jeffrey. :) I'm not really listening to much classical music, but I imagine I'll swing back around to it as time progresses. I always find it musically gratifying to explore a wide range of musical genres.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 23, 2020, 09:05:11 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 23, 2020, 12:58:35 PM
Indeed, not.

As long as one is developed and is clinically-proven to eliminate this virus 100% with no chances of recurrence is all we truly can hope for. Yes, there's no rushing science, but I have confidence that at some point we'll be able to get on with our lives. It's just the waiting game that is always worrying and the delays that, no doubt, will arise.

100% is not necessary, about 75% effectiveness is sufficient. Think of it this way, with no countermeasures each person with the virus gives it to an average of 3 other people in the course of a week or so. So 1 infection results in 3 infections, each of which results in another 3, giving 3x3 = 9, then 3x3x3 = 27, etc. Geometric progression.

But suppose 75% are immune due to a vaccine. Suppose 1000 people initially have it, they will give the virus to 3000 people, but if 75% are immune only 25% of the 3000 get infected, that is 750. Then the 750 give it to 2250 people, but only 25% of the 2250 get infected, that 562, etc. The infection fizzles, rather than growing exponentially. That's "herd immunity." It's how a vaccine can end it, if a vaccine can be found (not a given).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 24, 2020, 02:02:51 AM
https://lockdownsceptics.org/how-should-we-value-the-lives-of-those-most-at-risk/


QuoteSo the financial benefit of keeping the lockdown in place, in terms of the monetary value of the additional years of life granted to those people who would otherwise die of the virus, is greater than £41.4 billion. But then, so is the cost of the lockdown. According to the Resolution Foundation, it could cost the Treasury as much as £40 billion every three months just to pay the wages of furloughed workers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 24, 2020, 02:38:09 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 24, 2020, 02:02:51 AM
https://lockdownsceptics.org/how-should-we-value-the-lives-of-those-most-at-risk/

I think the discussion in this article is outdated.

The most important purpose of the lockdown (other than to prevent overload of the hospitals) is to slow down the epidemy in order to gain time to find a cure or a vaccine, and so far we don't know whether it is possible to obtain any efficient and sufficiently long lasting herd immunity or not (and much indicates that this isn't possible) by putting an end to the lockdown and let the virus spread freely, it will be extremely risky for the entire population (and not only for the vulnerables) to do so.

And people, who advocate opening of the society, apparently don't think they are at risk themselves. It is always easier to price others life than ones own.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 24, 2020, 03:26:38 AM
Coronavirus: 'I can't wash my hands - my water was cut off'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52384622
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 24, 2020, 06:22:56 AM
Trump has a geeeeeenius idea to share: bleach the virus out of your body.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/24/disinfectant-injection-coronavirus-trump/?hpid=hp_hp-banner-main_mm-disinfectant-645am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans&itid=hp_hp-banner-main_mm-disinfectant-645am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/24/disinfectant-injection-coronavirus-trump/?hpid=hp_hp-banner-main_mm-disinfectant-645am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans&itid=hp_hp-banner-main_mm-disinfectant-645am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 24, 2020, 08:18:52 AM
Or push a flashlight up your rear end, to let "the light inside your body".

So now we know how come his face is strangely orange. It's from the light within.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 24, 2020, 09:36:59 AM
That's why it's so important to have a filter. Everyone has stupid or potentially harmful ideas, just that some people actually think before they speak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 24, 2020, 09:37:27 AM
Harvard Toxicology (@Harvard_Tox)
Please don't inject bleach or drink disinfectant.
Bleach injections cause hemolysis (where your red blood cells that carry OXYGEN break apart) and cause liver damage, and many disinfectants can cause dangerous burns or bleeding in your stomach.
This tweet IS medical advice
https://twitter.com/Harvard_Tox/status/1253626240537448450?s=20
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 24, 2020, 10:02:10 AM
Quote from: greg on April 24, 2020, 09:36:59 AM
....some people actually think before they speak.

Hopefully most of us do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:07:11 AM
On a lighter note, as I've mentioned before, I've been required by the school where I work to teach 'online lessons' (what could possibly go wrong?) during the Coronavirus crisis. It's been for me (a technophobe) a very steep learning curve. I'd have never survived without amazing help from the school's IT department. My wife (a sign-language interpreter) and myself have been very careful not to disturb each other when we are working online. Well, today I was teaching my year 8 class (12 year olds) their History lesson on 'Life in Victorian Britain' when I became increasingly aware of the sound of a lot of banging and crashing from the back of the house and shouts of 'LET ME OUT OF HERE'. It transpired that the wind had blown the door shut, while my wife was doing some decorating in the bathroom (the door handles had been removed), thereby shutting her in the toilet. It is increasingly becoming a sitcom.
::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 10:31:38 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:07:11 AM
On a lighter note, as I've mentioned before, I've been required by the school where I work to teach 'online lessons' (what could possibly go wrong?) during the Coronavirus crisis. It's been for me (a technophobe) a very steep learning curve. I'd have never survived without amazing help from the school's IT department. My wife (a sign-language interpreter) and myself have been very careful not to disturb each other when we are working online. Well, today I was teaching my year 8 class (12 year olds) their History lesson on 'Life in Victorian Britain' when I became increasingly aware of the sound of a lot of banging and crashing from the back of the house and shouts of 'LET ME OUT OF HERE'. It transpired that the wind had blown the door shut, while my wife was doing some decorating in the bathroom (the door handles had been removed), thereby shutting her in the toilet. It is increasingly becoming a sitcom.
::)
;D  Oh, no! lol I trust that you didn't wait until the end of your lesson to let her out then?  ;)  And has your cat made any further appearances (to the delight of the students and the consternation of the teacher)?

Speaking of Victorian Britain, I ran across an article on the BBC's website about a Victorian farm; apparently, it's horses are a big hit on Twitter.  I'll see if I can find the link.  Ah, here we go:  https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-shropshire-52357499/coronavirus-shropshire-shire-horses-become-lockdown-twitter-stars  Perhaps when this is all over, you could do a field trip to the farm if it's not too far away?

PD

EDIT:  And here's their twitter account:  https://twitter.com/actonscottmuse
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:42:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 10:31:38 AM
;D  Oh, no! lol I trust that you didn't wait until the end of your lesson to let her out then?  ;)  And has your cat made any further appearances (to the delight of the students and the consternation of the teacher)?

Speaking of Victorian Britain, I ran across an article on the BBC's website about a Victorian farm; apparently, it's horses are a big hit on Twitter.  I'll see if I can find the link.  Ah, here we go:  https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-shropshire-52357499/coronavirus-shropshire-shire-horses-become-lockdown-twitter-stars  Perhaps when this is all over, you could do a field trip to the farm if it's not too far away?

PD

EDIT:  And here's their twitter account:  https://twitter.com/actonscottmuse
Loved the shire horses and the donkey. Thanks PD.
No, of course I leapt up immediately as soon as I realised what was going on to release my wife from the loo. Fortunately it was during a time during the lesson when my pupils were supposed to be 'quietly' getting on with their Victorian Britain History Project. I wonder how many of them were aware of all the banging and crashing going on in the background! I had to get up from my seat, earlier in the day, to let the cat out of the room where I was working.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 10:50:24 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:42:38 AM
Loved the shire horses and the donkey. Thanks PD.
No, of course I leapt up immediately as soon as I realised what was going on to release my wife from the loo. Fortunately it was during a time during the lesson when my pupils were supposed to be 'quietly' getting on with their Victorian Britain History Project. I wonder how many of them were aware of all the banging and crashing going on in the background! I had to get up from my seat, earlier in the day, to let the cat out of the room where I was working.
Whew! 

I also ran across a program that the BBC apparently did (in various parts) about Victorian farms, etc.  Found it on youtube!  I was going to say that perhaps you could access it on the BBC's website (I can't here for obvious reasons).  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLc9JhVp9B6Crpfu7asBwJZAY87d0iCTYw  Extra credit for the class perhaps?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:55:41 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 10:50:24 AM
Whew! 

I also ran across a program that the BBC apparently did (in various parts) about Victorian farms, etc.  Found it on youtube!  I was going to say that perhaps you could access it on the BBC's website (I can't here for obvious reasons).  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLc9JhVp9B6Crpfu7asBwJZAY87d0iCTYw  Extra credit for the class perhaps?
Very many thanks PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 11:06:39 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 10:55:41 AM
Very many thanks PD.
You're welcome!  And, oopsie, I think I just found something that will be keeping me busy!  I just started watching episode 1!   :-[

At this end, well, at least I managed to exchange my fluorescent grow lights for some LED ones on my two-tier plant stand.  I suspect that they wouldn't have had anything like this back then! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 12:08:24 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 11:06:39 AM
You're welcome!  And, oopsie, I think I just found something that will be keeping me busy!  I just started watching episode 1!   :-[

At this end, well, at least I managed to exchange my fluorescent grow lights for some LED ones on my two-tier plant stand.  I suspect that they wouldn't have had anything like this back then!
No, I'm sure you're right!
:)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 24, 2020, 12:36:04 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 24, 2020, 12:08:24 PM
No, I'm sure you're right!
:)
:laugh:  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM
Changing ideas on mechanical ventilation

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-ventilators-specia/special-report-as-virus-advances-doctors-rethink-rush-to-ventilate-idUSKCN2251PE
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 24, 2020, 12:56:36 PM
Quote from: greg on April 24, 2020, 09:36:59 AM
That's why it's so important to have a filter. Everyone has stupid or potentially harmful ideas, just that some people actually think before they speak.
Pity we cannot expect this of the POTUS

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 24, 2020, 02:02:11 PM
Accademia has been quick to react  ;D:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 24, 2020, 02:42:16 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 24, 2020, 02:02:11 PM
Accademia has been quick to react  ;D:



Should be Apr 23, not March, but apart from that, perfect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 24, 2020, 02:56:25 PM
Coronavirus detected on particles of air pollution
Exclusive: Scientists examine whether this route enables infections at longer distances (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/24/coronavirus-detected-particles-air-pollution)

"Coronavirus has been detected on particles of air pollution by scientists investigating whether this could enable it to be carried over longer distances and increase the number of people infected.

The work is preliminary and it is not yet known if the virus remains viable on pollution particles and in sufficient quantity to cause disease.

The Italian scientists used standard techniques to collect outdoor air pollution samples at one urban and one industrial site in Bergamo province and identified a gene highly specific to Covid-19 in multiple samples. The detection was confirmed by blind testing at an independent laboratory.

Leonardo Setti at the University of Bologna in Italy, who led the work, said it was important to investigate if the virus could be carried more widely by air pollution.

"I am a scientist and I am worried when I don't know," he said. "If we know, we can find a solution. But if we don't know, we can only suffer the consequences."

Two other research groups have suggested air pollution particles could help coronavirus travel further in the air.

A statistical analysis by Setti's team suggests higher levels of particle pollution could explain higher rates of infection in parts of northern Italy before a lockdown was imposed, an idea supported by another preliminary analysis. The region is one of the most polluted in Europe."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 24, 2020, 07:12:10 PM

     "Really Want to Flood NY and NJ": Internal Documents Reveal Team Trump's Chloroquine Master Plan (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/internal-documents-reveal-team-trumps-chloroquine-master-plan)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 24, 2020, 11:33:29 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 24, 2020, 07:12:10 PM
     "Really Want to Flood NY and NJ": Internal Documents Reveal Team Trump's Chloroquine Master Plan (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/internal-documents-reveal-team-trumps-chloroquine-master-plan)

The remaining question: was there some financial benefit to the Trump clan in this scheme, or was it merely Trump's wish to fulfill "I alone can fix this" mantra from 2016?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 25, 2020, 01:45:28 AM
Just listening to French radio, they're all talking about how restaurants can open (the French love their food), and some chef said "Oh no, it's difficult, it's impossible to wear a mask when eating  . . ."  and I just had a brilliant idea. Why not create post COVID restaurants in the style of Louis Bunuel's party in The Phantom of Liberty?

https://www.youtube.com/v/h1Mptgi23YE
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 25, 2020, 03:41:30 AM
Young and middle-aged people, barely sick with covid-19, are dying from strokes (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/24/strokes-coronavirus-young-patients/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 25, 2020, 09:07:09 AM
Quote from: Herman on April 24, 2020, 11:33:29 PM
The remaining question: was there some financial benefit to the Trump clan in this scheme, or was it merely Trump's wish to fulfill "I alone can fix this" mantra from 2016?

     Trump consistently tries to flout experts and government institutions. He's trying to wrongfoot them, to blame them for not doing things his way. So he'll adopt one positions after another that puts him on the other side of governors, science and health experts and anyone trying to take an objective position.

     The Georgia governor got a good dose of this. Because he acted, he will be blamed if it doesn't work out. He will be in the wrong just as much as if he had done the opposite.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 25, 2020, 12:25:36 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/LRXKXgS/cont.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on April 25, 2020, 11:26:33 PM
 "Reopen the country" protester (U.S).

(https://i.postimg.cc/q7wSZrFx/EWfu-BZ9-X0-Ag-TNTz.jpg) (https://postimages.org/) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 26, 2020, 12:08:52 AM
Repost that photo somewhere saying it's "Antifa" and watch the right wing lose their minds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on April 26, 2020, 03:14:57 AM
First and foremost, I'm mad at François Legault, for is stupid idea of collective immunity how stupid, this is a pandemic, there not sure what they doing, even Madame Tam Canada health spoke woman says covid 19 party to  get it is stupid, but my province go against this, and praise Legault idea even if risky as hell, and not 100% scientifically proven, they don't know what there doing, so in every backstreet, people do covid-19 party,(people my age whit kid 40-50) whit there kid to catch it , they trust this fool a 100% who is he a doctor, no a buzziness man, thus said not a doctor...

This is serious sh*t jeopardized our health, every sane people in Quebec should wear a darn mask  sick or not, I wear one when I go out in tobbaco store too, don't go out that much, once a day do everything purchase everything I need. Re-opening school too early is stupid, do kid follow the 2 feets distance no they don't.

Quebec population (generation X) especially are idiots, whit there theory of  collective immunity yep we all gonna get sick that way.

Do you're covid party if you won't inside you're stupid house don't  do stupid gathering Covid19 party...unless you're an idiot.

I think I'm more sick of stupidity and ''imcompétance'' of the  one that govern us.

The first case in canada was in January we should had take action that day and confined, the sick on a special islands of health care we in Canada have plenty of these  army based island in the north, we should had ship them there, and stop godamn immigration, quarantine every country for a while , wear stupid mask even if you're not infected, use fumigation like in china to clean the air the shop the street.

The worst part, this country are fool of idiot, and Quebec I'm afraid as it's fair share of dummy.

I'm trough whit this, I'm fed up seem no one know what there doing.And some people here in my country think I AM THE IDIOT...FOOLS!!!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 26, 2020, 03:31:17 AM
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(20)30152-2/fulltext

The diabetes/COVID interaction explored in the Lancet. Keep it controlled if you've got it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 26, 2020, 07:58:37 AM
This is a long (26 minutes) video, but Cenk Uygur in my opionion lists very well the facts about why Covid-19 is so devastating in the US.

US About to Pass Million Coronavirus Cases! Amazing Facts About American Healthcare System!

https://www.youtube.com/v/jA0yWSGfbrk
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 26, 2020, 11:11:50 AM
Global coronavirus death toll could be 60% higher than reported (https://www.ft.com/content/6bd88b7d-3386-4543-b2e9-0d5c6fac846c) (Financial Times)

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net%2Fprod%2Ff5300450-87d5-11ea-909b-f348a3cf33a9-fullwidth.png?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on April 26, 2020, 12:18:28 PM
This is somewhat surprising because where I live (Hesse) the average death rate was actually *lower* than the long term average in spite of Corona and it was assumed that the isolation measures reduced deaths from many other infectious diseases. Also the "annual" influenza was supposedly very weak last winter, so one should also take averages over several months, not only comparing the actual week, I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 27, 2020, 04:05:40 AM
Que's graph above says 100 more deaths in Denmark than "normal". The official count of corona related deaths is about 400, so this means that 300 more corona related deaths have replaced 300 deaths from other causes, in the first hand probably flu related deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 27, 2020, 06:40:06 AM
Seen in a friend's instagram account  ;):

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 27, 2020, 07:20:11 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 27, 2020, 06:40:06 AM
Seen in a friend's instagram account  ;):

I don't get it.   ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 27, 2020, 07:23:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 27, 2020, 07:20:11 AM
I don't get it.   ???

What condition do you think he could have been in to put the "x" where he did?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 27, 2020, 07:28:04 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 27, 2020, 07:23:23 AM
What condition do you think he could have been in to put the "x" where he did?  ;D

A hallucinated box marked "no I'm using LSD instead."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 27, 2020, 07:31:08 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 27, 2020, 07:23:23 AM
What condition do you think he could have been in to put the "x" where he did?  ;D

Feverish and head-ache-ish from Covid-19?  ;D

Seriously now, I thought about that but it's rather lame. Otoh, if there were two X, one in the NO field and another very nearby...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 27, 2020, 08:21:45 AM
Quote from: ritter on April 27, 2020, 06:40:06 AM
Seen in a friend's instagram account  ;):

The "don't know" option is missing. ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 27, 2020, 08:24:12 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 27, 2020, 08:21:45 AM
The "don't know" option is missing. ;)

Or the capture might suggest it's left to the reader's imagination...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 27, 2020, 10:13:46 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 27, 2020, 08:21:45 AM
The "don't know" option is missing. ;)

Or "Lemme get a drink first" box.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 27, 2020, 11:28:37 AM
Could you repeat the question?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 27, 2020, 01:58:56 PM
Quote from: Herman on April 27, 2020, 10:13:46 AM
Or "Lemme get a drink first" box.


If one chooses the" don't know" option, it might mean that one doesn't remember because of an intoxicated state. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 27, 2020, 03:41:09 PM
Exclusive: She's been falsely accused of starting the pandemic. Her life has been turned upside down (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/27/tech/coronavirus-conspiracy-theory/index.html)

"Maatje Benassi, a US Army reservist and mother of two, has become the target of conspiracy theorists who falsely place her at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, saying she brought the disease to China.

The false claims are spreading across YouTube every day, so far racking up hundreds of thousands of apparent views, and have been embraced by Chinese Communist Party media. Despite never having tested positive for the coronavirus or experienced symptoms, Benassi and her husband are now subjects of discussion on Chinese social media about the outbreak, including among accounts that are known drivers of large-scale coordinated activities by their followers.

[...]

"In the early weeks of the coronavirus, conspiracy theorists began claiming, without evidence, that it was a US biological weapon. Later one member of the Chinese government publicly promoted the notion that the US military brought the virus to China. US Defense Secretary Mark Esper said it was "completely ridiculous and it's irresponsible" for someone speaking on behalf of the Chinese government to promote such a claim.

It wasn't until March, months after the first reported coronavirus cases in China, that conspiracy theorists turned their focus to Maatje Benassi. The baseless theory began with her participation in October in the Military World Games, essentially the military Olympics, which was hosted by Wuhan, the Chinese city where the coronavirus outbreak began last year.

Maatje Benassi competed in the cycling competition there, suffering an accident on the final lap that left her with a fractured rib and a concussion. Despite the crash, Benassi still finished the race, but it turned out to be the start of something worse. While hundreds of athletes from the US military took part in the games, Maatje Benassi was plucked out of the group and given a starring role in the conspiracy theory.

Perhaps the most prominent cheerleader of the idea that Benassi had a role in the imaginary plot to infect the world is George Webb, a prolific 59-year-old American misinformation peddler. Webb has for years regularly streamed hours of diatribe live on YouTube, where he has amassed more than 27 million views and almost 100,000 followers.

In 2017, CNN revealed how Webb was part of a trio of conspiracy theorists that pushed a false rumor about a cargo ship with a "dirty bomb" that was set to arrive at the Port of Charleston in South Carolina. The bomb never materialized, but the claims did lead to parts of the port -- one of the biggest in America -- being shut down for a time as a safety precaution."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 27, 2020, 08:14:43 PM
How New Zeeland is handling the crises: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/new-zealand-says-it-has-eliminated-community-spread-of-the-coronavirus-but-is-keeping-most-restrictions-to-stop-it-coming-back/ar-BB13gfxH (https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/new-zealand-says-it-has-eliminated-community-spread-of-the-coronavirus-but-is-keeping-most-restrictions-to-stop-it-coming-back/ar-BB13gfxH)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 05:51:59 AM
Heart-breaking story here:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52451094
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 28, 2020, 06:23:31 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 05:51:59 AM
Heart-breaking story here:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52451094

Grievous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 28, 2020, 11:24:34 AM
From the Netherlands
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-mink/mink-found-to-have-coronavirus-on-two-dutch-farms-ministry-idUSKCN2280FZ
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 28, 2020, 01:37:04 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 05:51:59 AM
Heart-breaking story here:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52451094

To witness death on that scale proved too much. Poor woman.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 02:30:39 PM
Quote from: Irons on April 28, 2020, 01:37:04 PM
To witness death on that scale proved too much. Poor woman.
I can't imagine what the stress must have been like.  Being the medical director of an ER alone would certainly be rough, I'd think, but then to see people coming in in ambulances that were already dying before they could even be removed?!  She became infected herself, but went back to help.  What a wonderful person and a true hero.  Such a sad ending.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 28, 2020, 02:32:14 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 02:30:39 PM
What a wonderful person and a true hero.  Such a sad ending.

Yes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 28, 2020, 02:34:02 PM
Pence meets with Mayo Clinic patients, staff while not wearing face mask
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 28, 2020, 02:46:34 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 05:51:59 AM
Heart-breaking story here:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52451094

Terribly sad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 02:47:36 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 28, 2020, 02:34:02 PM
Pence meets with Mayo Clinic patients, staff while not wearing face mask
Yes, I've just been hearing about that on the news (upcoming story I believe)....yep, just watched it.  Sigh....apparently, they even told him of their policy!   ::)

Upcoming meat shortages for many Americans seems possible (according to CBS news)...people in main (think huge) meat processing plants getting Covid 19 due to bad working conditions?  https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/08/business/meat-plant-closures-coronavirus/index.html
but Pres. Trump is trying to get them considered "essential"?  https://apnews.com/67cb4bad7ffe500beabdf8e7e7efea5d

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 28, 2020, 03:03:34 PM
'The notion of a quick vaccine or a quick cure has largely evaporated. The Atlantic's Yascha Mounk writes that "our hopes for the pandemic's quick resolution should clearly be shelved. ... COVID-19 is too deadly to let it rip through the population. An effective cure is not in sight. And the federal government is incapable of formulating a coherent pandemic response."'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 29, 2020, 04:15:58 AM

Soon in your plate: coronavirus infected steak, bacon.

Trump signs executive order to keep meat-processing plants open. Giant plants have been closed in the past few days because of infection. 20 workers dead, 6500 infected so far.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/trump-orders-meat-processing-plants-to-stay-open-despite-coronavirus-fears/2020/04/29/f219ff05-24c6-49c3-8aa3-fa186a2d4ce6_video.html (https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/trump-orders-meat-processing-plants-to-stay-open-despite-coronavirus-fears/2020/04/29/f219ff05-24c6-49c3-8aa3-fa186a2d4ce6_video.html)
2 minute video clip worth watching.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on April 29, 2020, 07:13:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 28, 2020, 03:03:34 PM
'The notion of a quick vaccine or a quick cure has largely evaporated. The Atlantic's Yascha Mounk writes that "our hopes for the pandemic's quick resolution should clearly be shelved. ... COVID-19 is too deadly to let it rip through the population. An effective cure is not in sight. And the federal government is incapable of formulating a coherent pandemic response."'
This leads me to think the next election in the States will be carried out amidst confusion, acrimony and a shocking lack of confidence. It's mayhem to a world system that perceives a pole of power to have sunk, meaning a loss of balance.
I really fear for the mood of things around the world as fatigue sets in and countries and societies lurch forwards and backwards towards more political and medical crises.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 29, 2020, 07:43:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2020, 02:30:39 PM
I can't imagine what the stress must have been like.  Being the medical director of an ER alone would certainly be rough, I'd think, but then to see people coming in in ambulances that were already dying before they could even be removed?!  She became infected herself, but went back to help.  What a wonderful person and a true hero.  Such a sad ending.

We don't know the half of it, P. You are right "wonderful person".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 29, 2020, 07:58:19 AM
More on the subject of the meat processing plants and their workers.

Quote
What's really important is to keep that meat coming.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/29/trumps-latest-executive-order-highlights-our-inequality-crisis/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/29/trumps-latest-executive-order-highlights-our-inequality-crisis/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 29, 2020, 08:04:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 28, 2020, 03:03:34 PM
'The notion of a quick vaccine or a quick cure has largely evaporated. The Atlantic's Yascha Mounk writes that "our hopes for the pandemic's quick resolution should clearly be shelved. ... COVID-19 is too deadly to let it rip through the population. An effective cure is not in sight. And the federal government is incapable of formulating a coherent pandemic response."'

Indeed, I grow fatigued of gushing posts about "a vaccine already in clinical trials" or "such and such a drug used to treat toenail fungus showed promising result in Dr. Sousa's clinic in Portugal."

Dr. Fauci's estimate that a vaccine could be available in 18-24 months is optimistic. That would be the fastest effective vaccine development ever, as far as I know. There may never be a vaccine, there may never be herd immunity. This could be normal now, a version of the common cold that has a 0.5% chance of killing you...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 29, 2020, 09:01:52 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 29, 2020, 08:04:15 AM
Indeed, I grow fatigued of gushing posts about "a vaccine already in clinical trials" or "such and such a drug used to treat toenail fungus showed promising result in Dr. Sousa's clinic in Portugal."

Dr. Fauci's estimate that a vaccine could be available in 18-24 months is optimistic. That would be the fastest effective vaccine development ever, as far as I know. There may never be a vaccine, there may never be herd immunity. This could be normal now, a version of the common cold that has a 0.5% chance of killing you...

Wisdom.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 29, 2020, 09:04:55 AM
Something to monitor here I think


Covid-19: Patient 26's higher infection rate could be due to virus mutation

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/04/29/covid-19-patient-26039s-higher-infection-rate-could-be-due-to-virus-mutation
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 29, 2020, 09:59:30 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 29, 2020, 09:04:55 AM
Something to monitor here I think


Covid-19: Patient 26's higher infection rate could be due to virus mutation

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/04/29/covid-19-patient-26039s-higher-infection-rate-could-be-due-to-virus-mutation

Sounds like they have basically zero evidence to support that conjecture. From what I have read there are a dozen or so strains of the virus in circulation, typically differing from each other by one or two mutated nucleotides. This was described as on the low end of the range of typical mutation rates. You need more than an anecdotal story about a guy who gave it to a bunch of people to justify a claim that the strain is more aggressive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 29, 2020, 10:15:55 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 29, 2020, 09:59:30 AM
Sounds like they have basically zero evidence to support that conjecture. From what I have read there are a dozen or so strains of the virus in circulation, typically differing from each other by one or two mutated nucleotides. This was described as on the low end of the range of typical mutation rates. You need more than an anecdotal story about a guy who gave it to a bunch of people to justify a claim that the strain is more aggressive.

Yes, I was pleased to find no more on the web about it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 29, 2020, 10:30:05 AM
Maybe wishful thinking, but I wonder if I've already had the virus. The school where I work includes a pupil whose family were allegedly one of the first to bring the virus over here (UK - from a skiing holiday in Italy). Just before Christmas I developed a persistent dry cough, became very fatigued and suffered from some mental confusion (although my wife tells me that this is my normal state). For example a friend came round unexpectedly to see me, when I was having a nap, and I didn't know whether it was 5.00pm or 5.00am. I told him to leave as I might be infectious. It then went to my chest and eventually I phoned the local surgery who told me to come in to see the prescribing nurse. She listened to my chest and said she could hear the infection very clearly and prescribed me anti-biotics to 'knock it on the head'. I'm aware that anti-biotics are not much use against a virus but, over the next week I got better. I've always assumed that it was just a bad chest infection but it was not like one I'd ever had before. I've assumed that it was too early to be Coronavirus but I was reading yesterday that the disease could have been in Europe as early as November which made me wonder. Having said that I never had a fever or a high temperature but otherwise felt pretty ill. Just a thought.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2020, 10:36:05 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 29, 2020, 10:30:05 AM
Maybe wishful thinking, but I wonder if I've already had the virus. The school where I work includes a pupil whose family were allegedly one of the first to bring the virus over here (UK - from a skiing holiday in Italy). Just before Christmas I developed a persistent dry cough, became very fatigued and suffered from some mental confusion (although my wife tells me that this is my normal state). For example a friend came round unexpectedly to see me, when I was having a nap, and I didn't know whether it was 5.00pm or 5.00am. I told him to leave as I might be infectious. It then went to my chest and eventually I phoned the local surgery who told me to come in to see the prescribing nurse. She listened to my chest and said she could hear the infection very clearly and prescribed me anti-biotics to 'knock it on the head'. I'm aware that anti-biotics are not much use against a virus but, over the next week I got better. I've always assumed that it was just a bad chest infection but it was not like one I'd ever had before. I've assumed that it was too early to be Coronavirus but I was reading yesterday that the disease could have been in Europe as early as November which made me wonder. Having said that I never had a fever or a high temperature but otherwise felt pretty ill. Just a thought.
Interesting Jeffrey.  Do you know when they came back from Italy (was it at the end of a school vacation break?)....and also when you started to feel ill?  And is there any test that you could take that would indicate at this point in time as to whether or not you had had the virus?

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 29, 2020, 11:51:22 AM
I experienced something similar around mid-January. I didn't have a fever during the day, but when I got to bed I had shivers, teeth rattling and I couldn't get warm even with a heavy bathrobe on top of my pajamas. That lasted 3 days, then only cough, sore throat and running nose remained. I consulted a doctor and she told me it was the common cold, only a bad one. Symptoms could last 3-4 weeks, she said. I got better, but coughed for 6 weeks. I, too, figured it was way too early for the covid. I wonder.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 29, 2020, 11:58:12 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 29, 2020, 08:04:15 AM
Indeed, I grow fatigued of gushing posts about "a vaccine already in clinical trials" or "such and such a drug used to treat toenail fungus showed promising result in Dr. Sousa's clinic in Portugal."

Dr. Fauci's estimate that a vaccine could be available in 18-24 months is optimistic. That would be the fastest effective vaccine development ever, as far as I know. There may never be a vaccine, there may never be herd immunity. This could be normal now, a version of the common cold that has a 0.5% chance of killing you...

Solid, Jackson!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 29, 2020, 12:04:21 PM
There were several large conventions and shows in Las Vegas in December, some of them with participants from China,  and consistent reports afterwards of more than a few attendees coming down with a flu-like illness. Therefore some people are speculating that that was actually an initial wave of COVID19 infections.  As far as know, no deaths were associated with that outbreak, whatever it was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 29, 2020, 12:12:51 PM
It's too bad so little testing is done, because one does wonder about these sick spells.

On the other hand there are increasing reports that having had a version of corona doesn't grant immunity.

You could get infected either way, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 29, 2020, 12:36:23 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 29, 2020, 10:30:05 AM
Maybe wishful thinking, but I wonder if I've already had the virus. The school where I work includes a pupil whose family were allegedly one of the first to bring the virus over here (UK - from a skiing holiday in Italy). Just before Christmas I developed a persistent dry cough, became very fatigued and suffered from some mental confusion (although my wife tells me that this is my normal state). For example a friend came round unexpectedly to see me, when I was having a nap, and I didn't know whether it was 5.00pm or 5.00am. I told him to leave as I might be infectious. It then went to my chest and eventually I phoned the local surgery who told me to come in to see the prescribing nurse. She listened to my chest and said she could hear the infection very clearly and prescribed me anti-biotics to 'knock it on the head'. I'm aware that anti-biotics are not much use against a virus but, over the next week I got better. I've always assumed that it was just a bad chest infection but it was not like one I'd ever had before. I've assumed that it was too early to be Coronavirus but I was reading yesterday that the disease could have been in Europe as early as November which made me wonder. Having said that I never had a fever or a high temperature but otherwise felt pretty ill. Just a thought.

Seems like it could be Covid-19, but could be something else. Unfortunately, I gather the antibody tests are in short supply and are of variable reliability. Impossible to know. Hopefully someone is collecting this sort of data.

New York state has done some randomized testing. 13.9% infected, 0.1% have died, 0.7% of people infected have died. Consistent with other sources of data.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 29, 2020, 12:43:31 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 29, 2020, 10:30:05 AM
Maybe wishful thinking, but I wonder if I've already had the virus. The school where I work includes a pupil whose family were allegedly one of the first to bring the virus over here (UK - from a skiing holiday in Italy). Just before Christmas I developed a persistent dry cough, became very fatigued and suffered from some mental confusion (although my wife tells me that this is my normal state). For example a friend came round unexpectedly to see me, when I was having a nap, and I didn't know whether it was 5.00pm or 5.00am. I told him to leave as I might be infectious. It then went to my chest and eventually I phoned the local surgery who told me to come in to see the prescribing nurse. She listened to my chest and said she could hear the infection very clearly and prescribed me anti-biotics to 'knock it on the head'. I'm aware that anti-biotics are not much use against a virus but, over the next week I got better. I've always assumed that it was just a bad chest infection but it was not like one I'd ever had before. I've assumed that it was too early to be Coronavirus but I was reading yesterday that the disease could have been in Europe as early as November which made me wonder. Having said that I never had a fever or a high temperature but otherwise felt pretty ill. Just a thought.

Quote from: JBS on April 29, 2020, 12:04:21 PM
There were several large conventions and shows in Las Vegas in December, some of them with participants from China,  and consistent reports afterwards of more than a few attendees coming down with a flu-like illness. Therefore some people are speculating that that was actually an initial wave of COVID19 infections.  As far as know, no deaths were associated with that outbreak, whatever it was.


   I was in the Rome region in early December & also had a cold or flu for about 5-6 days, some dry coughing and a very light fever, but no wet nose, which is unusual for me, yet also no breathing problems, besides my very mild asthma, where I'd dropped the medicine for quite some time. I almost never get a flu otherwise, but it must be said that I had taken a very long day-hike without suitably wintery clothes. I did frequent some Chinese shops & a Chinese restaurant some days before getting sick, and I didn't infect anyone else. But though it's probably exaggerated associations, I have been checking regularly, whether information comes up about perhaps earlier (and maybe milder?) outbreaks in Italy ... still, such a thing would also overthrow the established Chinese chronology itself, so it's not very likely, I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2020, 01:11:19 PM
Twoyears ago, I had a horrible cold/virus which lasted for several months.  I didn't have a fever but coughing was crazy (I found out that taking an expectorant helped a lot (think that I also took antihistamines and maybe decongestant at one point?).  A number of other people in my town came down with the same thing.  I'm bringing this up just to say that it can be hard to figure out what one has (or had) or didn't have.  First time that I recall getting something like that though.  It just had to run its course.

Feel for the people working in the meat packing industry.  One thought that has crossed my mind lately:  how are things with the smaller (think local and/or free range, etc.) companies?  Anyone here read Upton Sinclair's The Jungle before?  Interesting story on now on Dr. Oz Show about the food chain.  Meat sales are up 43 percent but with (I think that he said) 18% less workers.  From what I understand, at the big plants, there's no way currently that workers can keep 6 feet apart.  I'll put a link to the show when it's over and available.  It's quite interesting!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 29, 2020, 01:17:38 PM
As of late January 2020 I had the following symptoms:

--- 38/39 C fever, for 4 days in a row;

--- sore throat (as in, a razor was glued on my throat; each and every swallowing was a torture --- for two days in a row);

--- loss of appetite (for a week I barely ate);

--- extreme physical weakness;

--- I was cured of all this mess with 7-day treatment of antibiotics.

Was it Covid-19?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on April 29, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Well, if antibiotics cured you, it wasn't Covid-19, that's for sure. If you were cured regardless of having taken antibiotics, then perhaps it was...

And good evening to you, good Sir!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 29, 2020, 01:29:48 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 29, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
Well, if antibiotics cured you, it wasn't Covid-19, that's for sure. If you were cured regardless of having taken antibiotics, then perhaps it was...

I'm sure it wasn't Covid-19. But what if I had those symptoms miid- or late- April? Would not I have been recorded as a Covid-19 case?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 29, 2020, 01:31:45 PM
Quote from: ritter on April 29, 2020, 01:26:27 PM
And good evening to you, good Sir!

To you as well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2020, 02:21:55 PM
This article left me in shocked, sad, jaw-dropped.....without words:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52471208

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 29, 2020, 03:00:57 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2020, 10:36:05 AM
Interesting Jeffrey.  Do you know when they came back from Italy (was it at the end of a school vacation break?)....and also when you started to feel ill?  And is there any test that you could take that would indicate at this point in time as to whether or not you had had the virus?

Best,

PD
Thanks PD (and André, Andrei, Baron S, Music Turner) for the interesting follow up comments. Actually the government yesterday announced that anyone over 65 with symptoms could get a test. However, I'm not yet 65 (not quite anyway) and I no longer have symptoms but I would be really interested to know. I wonder if thousands if not millions of people have already had the virus without realising it. At the time I was ill I'd never heard of Coronovirus and it is only retrospectively that I wonder if I and maybe many others here have already had it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 29, 2020, 05:07:06 PM
Quote from: Florestan on April 29, 2020, 01:17:38 PM
As of late January 2020 I had the following symptoms:

--- 38/39 C fever, for 4 days in a row;

--- sore throat (as in, a razor was glued on my throat; each and every swallowing was a torture --- for two days in a row);

--- loss of appetite (for a week I barely ate);

--- extreme physical weakness;

--- I was cured of all this mess with 7-day treatment of antibiotics.

Was it Covid-19?



Glad you've mended!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 29, 2020, 05:17:56 PM
Swedish city to dump tonne of chicken manure in park to deter visitors
Lund council hoping 'stink' keeps people away on Walpurgis Night (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/29/swedish-city-lund-dump-tonne-chicken-manure-park-deter-visitors-coronavirus-lockdown)

"The university town of Lund in Sweden is to dump a tonne of chicken manure in its central park in a bid to deter up to 30,000 residents from gathering there for traditional celebrations to mark Walpurgis Night on Thursday.

"Lund could very well become an epicentre for the spread of the coronavirus on the last night in April, [so] I think it was a good initiative," the chairman of the local council's environment committee, Gustav Lundblad, told the Sydsvenskan newspaper.

"We get the opportunity to fertilise the lawns, and at the same time it will stink and so it may not be so nice to sit and drink beer in the park," Lundblad said, adding that the only potential drawback was that the smell may not be confined to the park.

"I am not a fertiliser expert, but as I understand it, it is clear that it might smell a bit outside the park as well," Lundblad admitted. "These are chicken droppings, after all. I cannot guarantee that the rest of the city will be odourless. But the point is to keep people out of the city park."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 29, 2020, 05:27:35 PM
They are starving': women in India's sex industry struggle for survival
Exclusion from government Covid-19 relief has left many reliant on private food donations, as fears raised over protection from transmission after lockdown (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/29/they-are-starving-women-in-indias-sex-industry-struggle-for-survival)

"Rasheeda Bibi has five rupees to her name. A worker in India's sex industry, she lives in the narrow lanes of Kolkata's Kalighat red light area with her three children in a room she rents for 620 rupees (£6) a month.

As a thunderstorm rages through the city, Bibi worries about the leaky roof of her small room.

It is now a month since India went into total lockdown on 26 March to contain the spread of Covid-19. With no clients, Bibi's savings have dwindled. She has no money left for food, or sanitary towels for herself and her daughters, let alone for fixing the roof.

As non-essential economic activity has ground to a halt, the lockdown has hit millions of people working in the informal sector. The government has announced relief schemes for the poor, but women working in the sex industry are outside their ambit. In India sex work is not illegal, but several supporting activities are; maintaining brothels and soliciting customers are criminal offences.

According to a survey by UNAids, in 2016 India had 657,800 sex workers, though the true number is likely to be much higher. Most of their clients earn daily wages and, as millions of people have become unemployed, this clientele has disappeared overnight.

Urmi Basu, the founder of New Light in Kolkata, which works with children of sex workers, worries about the long-term situation. "Even when the lockdown lifts, if they start taking clients, there is no way of knowing who's carrying the virus. Unlike HIV/Aids, a condom can't protect them. How does one negotiate safety in this situation?"

As part of the government's relief scheme for the poor, India's prime minister Narendra Modi has announced a financial package that will deposit 500 rupees (£5.30) monthly into the bank accounts of 200 million people. But those working in or trafficked into the sex industry – many of whom lack government-approved documentation to access public distribution systems and relief schemes – are not included.

Women like Bibi earn around 200-300 rupees (£2) per client and see three or four clients a day. From their earnings, they pay rent, utility bills, and buy food and medicines, as well as pay for education and care for dependents. Then there is the commission for brothel keepers and pimps.

"They have no food, they are starving. They live in tiny, windowless rooms with no fresh air. Many don't have access to running water; sometimes, the choice is between paying water bills or topping up phones," says Ruchira Gupta, founder of Apne Aap Women Worldwide, which works for the eradication of sex trafficking in India.

In cities like Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata, brothels are located in jam-packed red light areas where social distancing is impossible. Delhi's GB Road has more than 3,000 sex workers housed in 80 small brothels. Kolkata's Sonagachi, which is referred to as Asia's largest red-light area, has between 8,000–10,000 sex workers.

Hygiene is a challenge, with limited access to running water and as many as 20 people sharing one bathroom. Brothels rarely have kitchens and women buy food from vendors. For these women, the lockdown has meant the loss of their entire ecosystem – rickshaw drivers, corner stores, and street carts.

Social workers say financial distress has increased instances of domestic violence and conflict. Priti Patkar, founder of Prerana, an anti-trafficking charity in Mumbai, believes this puts children at risk. "When adults are in strife, they pass it on to children," she says.

As the uncertainty – and fear of the pandemic – grows, social workers anticipate a sharp spike in depression, anxiety, and perhaps, suicide.

With no government support, the onus to help the marginalised has fallen on the voluntary sector. Women working in the sex industry are now dependent on charities for their basic needs, including food and access to medication during the lockdown, especially antiretroviral therapy medications for treating HIV/Aids.

Gupta recalls a call from a 12-year-old child, the daughter of a sex worker, who said the family hadn't eaten for 10 days. This kind of distress call is common and similar calls are coming from all areas of the country, she says. The problem is the same: women have no money, they haven't eaten for days and the police are forcing them to stay inside."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 29, 2020, 10:56:38 PM
Funny how it turns out pretty much everybody didn't feel too great in December.

Generally, from what I have heard, the symptoms of passing Corona are quite serious, in that it's a fever that lingers for two weeks and usually people mention back aches, too, and of course throat aches.

But perhaps there's all kinds. And apparently the younger one is, the shorter the spell can be. Not always, though... There are horror stories of quite young people who get hit with extreme auto-immune reactions and there are the embolic blood clots.

The central thing to keep in mind, though is, even if you already have been visited by Corona, this is no guarantee you're home free for the rest of 2020. Apparently there is no lasting immunity.

A friend of mine had test confirmed Corona. She is 62 years old and in reasonably good shape generally, as is her husband, who is 65 years old. They both had it, felt utterly crap for about four weeks, they stayed home, and they're getting back in shape now.

So the good news is, Corona doesn't need to be a death sentence, even if you're getting on in years. It does help if you live a somewhat healthy life (no smoking, taking serious walks, don't spend your entire day listening to Wagner, or sitting behind the laptop talking about it) and you also need to be lucky in that your lungs and heart are pretty much okay. Corona diminishes lung capacity, so it takes a toll on one's heart, which needs to work harder to circulate the oxygen. Also, if you have a high fever for a long time this can release all kinds of bacterial crap in your bloodstream  -  this is where the antibiotics come in.

I'm saying this as a layman, as old as that damn Paul McCartney song with "Vera, Chuck and Dave", having basically the same information as you guys.

The thing is, we keep reading about the death toll, which is why (I am no exception) we kind of get obsessed with Corona being the End, and in some cases it is, but you can work on it and escape in two ways. Self-isolate (pref with a loved one) and stay in good shape.

And no Wagner!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 30, 2020, 12:33:47 AM
Good points I think. My older brother included the lyrics of that Beatle song in his last birthday card to me!
I'm trying to keep active and last weekend did an 8 and a half mile walk over the South Downs, on the basis that we are now allowed to drive to a walk as long as the walk is longer than the drive. It was great to get out in lovely scenery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 30, 2020, 04:02:52 AM
Lockdown motet, Renaissance style

https://www.youtube.com/v/UFqgAwH20_I

This is very good, very much worth a listen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 30, 2020, 05:49:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 30, 2020, 04:02:52 AM
Lockdown motet, Renaissance style

https://www.youtube.com/v/UFqgAwH20_I

This is very good, very much worth a listen.

Very good  :D. I suppose Emanuelis stands for Macron?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 30, 2020, 07:20:56 AM
We try to keep this thread free of political conspiracy theories.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 08:26:07 AM

     Why is it necessary for Trump to pressure intelligence agencies to come up with evidence that the virus came from the lab? I'm old fashioned in wanting intelligence to flow up from gatherers to decision makers. I don't trust decision makers telling the agencies what they should find. If they are supposed to find what they want to be there, why not hire theologians to replace the spooks?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 30, 2020, 08:56:19 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 08:26:07 AM
     Why is it necessary for Trump to pressure intelligence agencies to come up with evidence that the virus came from the lab? I'm old fashioned in wanting intelligence to flow up from gatherers to decision makers. I don't trust decision makers telling the agencies what they should find. If they are supposed to find what they want to be there, why not hire theologians to replace the spooks?

Isn't that what Trump is doing, more or less? Until he is disconcerted to find that some of his appointees have some residue of integrity, and he has to swap them out again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on April 30, 2020, 09:19:04 AM
Trump dittoheads have been spreading conspiracy theories about "the Chinese virus" on social media for quite a while now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 30, 2020, 11:09:49 AM
Pour le professeur Raoult : "l'Afrique sub-saharienne est relativement protégée"

https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/International/Pour-le-professeur-Raoult-l-Afrique-est-relativement-protegee-1681460

Pour Didier Raoult, il est "possible que d'ici un mois, il n'y ait plus de cas dans les pays tempérés

https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Sante/Pour-Didier-Raoult-il-est-possible-que-d-ici-qu-il-n-y-ait-plus-de-cas-dans-les-pays-temperes-1682862

QuoteDans une interview accordée à la presse sénégalaise, le professeur Didier Raoult déclare que l'Afrique sub-saharienne pourrait avoir une réaction différente à la propagation du Covid19 grâce à son "écosystème".

The protection in Africa, according to Raoult, maybe due to the widespread use of antimalarials. Unfortunately I don't subscribe to Paris Match so I can't see the whole interview.

QuoteIl poursuit : «Je ne prédis pas l'avenir, mais si les choses continuent comme ça, on a bien l'impression que ce qui était l'une des possibilités de cette maladie, c'est-à-dire une maladie saisonnière, est en train de se réaliser. Il est possible que d'ici un mois, il n'y ait plus de cas du tout dans la plupart des pays tempérés»

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 30, 2020, 12:24:52 PM
« Une maladie saisonnière »

The word « saisonnier » (saisonnière for feminine nouns) means 'for one season', but the implication is that it recurs every year ('une culture saisonnière'). Maybe he meant that it will be for one season only, with no recurrence?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 03:04:39 PM

     Comparing COVID-19 Deaths to Flu Deaths Is like Comparing Apples to Oranges (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tDi4PKdk8MgJ:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/comparing-covid-19-deaths-to-flu-deaths-is-like-comparing-apples-to-oranges/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

     Since doctors rarely see people die of the flu, where do these estimates of thousands of flu deaths come from? Why are hospitals never overcome with flu cases like they are with Covid 19? Something is not right, a big bad something.

If we compare, for instance, the number of people who died in the United States from COVID-19 in the second full week of April to the number of people who died from influenza during the worst week of the past seven flu seasons (as reported to the CDC), we find that the novel coronavirus killed between 9.5 and 44 times more people than seasonal flu. In other words, the coronavirus is not anything like the flu: It is much, much worse.

From this perspective, the data on coronavirus and flu actually match—rather than flying in the face of—our lived reality in the coronavirus pandemic: hospitals in hot spots stretched to their limits and, in New York City in particular, so many dead that the bodies are stacked in refrigerator trucks. We have never seen such conditions.


     Welcome to Earth!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 04:07:40 PM
     One reason to be skeptical of the lab release narrative is that they may have never possessed the virus in the first place.

The Wuhan team leader, renowned virologist Shi Zhengli, contends that the institute never possessed the SARS-cov-2 virus that triggered the outbreak that has infected more than 3 million people worldwide. In a social media posting, Shi said she would "bet my life" that the outbreak had "nothing to do with the lab."

     If we can't even refute the claim that the lab never had the virus, how can we believe the claim that they mishandled it?

     

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on April 30, 2020, 04:21:39 PM
We either keep the quarantines in place and potentially damage the economy or we open the economy and risk the lives hundreds of thousands of Americans.  We may put at risk the lives of peoples in other countries.  One third of the recorded cased are in the United States.

I do not know the answer and I am skeptical of anyone who thinks he does.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 30, 2020, 04:46:14 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 04:07:40 PM
     One reason to be skeptical of the lab release narrative is that they may have never possessed the virus in the first place.

The Wuhan team leader, renowned virologist Shi Zhengli, contends that the institute never possessed the SARS-cov-2 virus that triggered the outbreak that has infected more than 3 million people worldwide. In a social media posting, Shi said she would "bet my life" that the outbreak had "nothing to do with the lab."

     If we can't even refute the claim that the lab never had the virus, how can we believe the claim that they mishandled it?

     

     

Oh, conspiracy theorists can believe whatever they please....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 30, 2020, 04:59:09 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 04:07:40 PM
     One reason to be skeptical of the lab release narrative is that they may have never possessed the virus in the first place.

The Wuhan team leader, renowned virologist Shi Zhengli, contends that the institute never possessed the SARS-cov-2 virus that triggered the outbreak that has infected more than 3 million people worldwide. In a social media posting, Shi said she would "bet my life" that the outbreak had "nothing to do with the lab."

     If we can't even refute the claim that the lab never had the virus, how can we believe the claim that they mishandled it?   
Seriously? That's like being a police officer and getting to a crime scene and seeing a guy run outside with a gun and bloody gloves and asking him if he did it, then walking away when he says he didn't.

They were studying coronaviruses in bats at the time, they even left job postings on their website about that.

Apparently this sort of thing has happened before, so I don't see why it's so difficult to believe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 07:13:15 PM
Quote from: greg on April 30, 2020, 04:59:09 PM
Seriously? That's like being a police officer and getting to a crime scene and seeing a guy run outside with a gun and bloody gloves and asking him if he did it, then walking away when he says he didn't.

They were studying coronaviruses in bats at the time, they even left job postings on their website about that.

Apparently this sort of thing has happened before, so I don't see why it's so difficult to believe.

     It's easy to believe. I'm not interested in the easy part. The lab director says they didn't have this virus. It doesn't matter what happened with other viruses they did have in the lab.

     If the intelligence agencies or virologists say different, the game changes. No one says different. As far as the world knows (not believes, knows), there is no evidence the lab had the virus they might have mishandled if they did have it, if "this sort of thing" occurred this sort of time.

      Chinese lab conducted extensive research on deadly bat viruses, but there is no evidence of accidental release (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/chinese-lab-conducted-extensive-research-on-deadly-bat-viruses-but-there-is-no-evidence-of-accidental-release/2020/04/30/3e5d12a0-8b0d-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html)

But while an accidental release may have been possible, no proof of such of an event has emerged. The closest relative to the coronavirus that causes covid-19 known to have existed at Wuhan was still a distant relative, scientists say. In March, a landmark study of the virus's origins in the journal Nature Medicine played down the possibility of an accident, saying "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."

     Maybe we can scare up a closest relative sort of theory that implicates the lab. It only has to be good enough for belief, yes? It's not like it has to be true or anything.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on April 30, 2020, 08:25:15 PM
Quote from: greg on April 30, 2020, 04:59:09 PM
Seriously? That's like being a police officer and getting to a crime scene and seeing a guy run outside with a gun and bloody gloves and asking him if he did it, then walking away when he says he didn't.

They were studying coronaviruses in bats at the time, they even left job postings on their website about that.

Apparently this sort of thing has happened before, so I don't see why it's so difficult to believe.

I don't believe that everything which is possible is true. It is possible but there is no particular evidence for it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 30, 2020, 08:47:27 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on April 30, 2020, 08:25:15 PM
I don't believe that everything which is possible is true. It is possible but there is no particular evidence for it.
If you want evidence then don't believe anything- that's perfectly fine. But we are only allowed to play the guessing game here- and it's fine for people to sit out as long they don't heckle the players from the sidelines.
(Though personally I don't get why people are so scared of making guesses when there is a lack of information, since that's literally all you can do why not do it anyways).

There's more signs pointing to the lab than the wet market, and those are the only two guesses available to us. Previously I was accepting the wet market theory but the lab theory just has too many red flags. So guess I'm switching teams. But if it were proven to be the wet market without a doubt, it doesn't really matter much either way.





Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 07:13:15 PM
     It's easy to believe. I'm not interested in the easy part. The lab director says they didn't have this virus. It doesn't matter what happened with other viruses they did have in the lab.

     If the intelligence agencies or virologists say different, the game changes. No one says different. As far as the world knows (not believes, knows), there is no evidence the lab had the virus they might have mishandled if they did have it, if "this sort of thing" occurred this sort of time.

      Chinese lab conducted extensive research on deadly bat viruses, but there is no evidence of accidental release (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/chinese-lab-conducted-extensive-research-on-deadly-bat-viruses-but-there-is-no-evidence-of-accidental-release/2020/04/30/3e5d12a0-8b0d-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html)

But while an accidental release may have been possible, no proof of such of an event has emerged. The closest relative to the coronavirus that causes covid-19 known to have existed at Wuhan was still a distant relative, scientists say. In March, a landmark study of the virus's origins in the journal Nature Medicine played down the possibility of an accident, saying "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."

     Maybe we can scare up a closest relative sort of theory that implicates the lab. It only has to be good enough for belief, yes? It's not like it has to be true or anything.
ahem... did you not get the memo that you absolutely cannot trust what the people at the lab say? If it turns out that the CCP doesn't know of the origins, telling the truth would get them killed, and probably their families, too.
I didn't bother to even read the article, because of the headline. Why would there be evidence? Why would they leave it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 30, 2020, 09:37:22 PM
Quote from: greg on April 30, 2020, 08:47:27 PM
evidence

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 01, 2020, 12:17:05 AM
Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 07:13:15 PM
The lab director says they didn't have this virus.

If she says that then it must certainly be true. After all, people in charge of sensitive entities operating under extreme ideological pressure from their governments are universally reputed to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Quote from: drogulus on April 30, 2020, 04:07:40 PMIf we can't even refute the claim that the lab never had the virus, how can we believe the claim that they mishandled it?

Of course. We can't refute Marquis de Carabas's claim that Puss-in-Boots is his footman, so how can we believe the claim that Puss-in-Boots does not exist?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 01, 2020, 12:56:25 AM
The "Chinese Lab" theory is completely bogus, there is not a shred of evidence for it.

It's Trump's desperate attempt to pivot the attention away from his abysmal performance this year by pointing to an external enemy, and by even discussing this crazy theory you're basically doing Trump's work.

People are talking about "punishing" China. Seriously? China owns half of the USA. The only one capable of punishing anybody is China, by pulling the rug out under America's financial system. They're not going to do that, since it would hurt China, too, but just try to figure this as a reality check.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 01:02:53 AM
There's also been no anonymous whistleblowing from anyone connected to the lab to support that spin.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 01, 2020, 01:08:03 AM
On the other music group, which got so right wing many of today's members fled to GMG fifteen years ago, one of the nuttiest posters who is parroting the GOPs talking points to a T is now calling for a "Total War against China".

If called on it (but who would do that there) I'm sure he'll say he was just being "sarcastic".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 01, 2020, 03:10:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 01, 2020, 12:17:05 AM
If she says that then it must certainly be true. After all, people in charge of sensitive entities operating under extreme ideological pressure from their governments are universally reputed to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Of course. We can't refute Marquis de Carabas's claim that Puss-in-Boots is his footman, so how can we believe the claim that Puss-in-Boots does not exist?

     The Wuhan lab has so many connections with virologists in around the world that it would be hard to keep a secret against the wishes of so many people highly motivated to get the truth out. So, where is the back channel leak we would need? If the spooks haven't got it, and virologists aren't doing their duty to humanity by exposing this terrible accident, what's the claim based on?

     Believers do the easy part, believe what they want. People with standards mop up after.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 01, 2020, 03:51:55 AM
"A "calamitous event" like the pandemic creates a "very fertile breeding ground for conspiracy theories," said John Cook, an expert on misinformation with George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication.

The onslaught of information and misinformation on social media, on cable news and in general conversation may create confusion, but it's made even worse by human discomfort with ambiguity, especially when our lives are at stake.

Kate Pine, an assistant professor in the College of Health Solutions at Arizona State University, is currently interviewing people around the United States on how they're navigating covid-19. She said people "feel like they're inundated with information, but they don't have the information they want," and as a result, they might be more willing to believe outlandish claims." [...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on May 01, 2020, 04:38:48 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 30, 2020, 09:37:22 PM
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf

My number one takeaway from this article: They eat pangolins? Seriously?

My summary of the findings as I (mis?)understand(?) them: Two features of the novel coronavirus's genome that distinguish it from other SARS coronaviruses and which are key to its ability to infect humans have been found in bats and pangolins respectively. They don't occur in any of the coronaviruses that were being manipulated in the Wuhan lab. Therefore, transfer from animals is the likely scenario, although it is possible that mutations in a similar virus occurred during human to human transmission as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 05:16:59 AM
Yeah. Poor little pangolins. I think their scales get ground up into some kind of magic healing powder.

If they're considered toxic and left alone after this it may be one good thing to come of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 01, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
China has turned to bullying to avoid accountability. It may be working on Europe. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/china-has-turned-to-bullying-to-avoid-accountability-it-may-be-working-on-europe/2020/04/30/30be39c2-8977-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 01, 2020, 05:37:20 AM
Nearly seven weeks into the shutdown, here's why so many are still getting sick

By
Kyle Swenson and
Jenna Portnoy
April 30, 2020 at 6:05 p.m. EDT
The District, Maryland and Virginia have been shut down for weeks, their economies in tatters. Large swaths of the population venture out only rarely, wrapped in masks and gloves.

But hundreds of new coronavirus cases are still reported each day as the virus continues its devastating march through nursing homes, jails and other institutional settings. Doctors and public health officials said it increasingly is infecting people who cannot afford to miss work or telecommute — grocery store employees, delivery drivers and construction workers. Sometimes they, in turn, infect their families.

On Thursday alone, there were nearly 2,000 new cases, and 111 deaths.

"It is community spread, then taking it home," said Sonja Bachus, chief executive of Greater Baden Medical Services, which has locations in Charles and Prince George's counties in Maryland. "It is disheartening."

The decisions to close schools and ban large gatherings in mid-March, and issue stay-at-home orders in the District, Maryland and Virginia two weeks later, have helped slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, experts say. But that doesn't mean no one is getting sick.

While some of the first known victims in the greater Washington area had traveled on international cruises and to professional conferences, it is now more common to hear about police officers, firefighters and health-care workers contracting the virus.

Medical technician Tiffany Smith had been running a fever for four days when she showed up for a free coronavirus test this week outside a dilapidated shopping center in Richmond. One of her co-workers at an assisted-living facility in Chesterfield County has the virus.

Smith's five children, ages 14 to 28, have mostly felt fine, she said, and are "walking around like nothing's wrong."

Jeffrey Martin, a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California at San Francisco's School of Medicine, said some continued spread is inevitable, even with the broad shutdown. On the West Coast, which began social distancing before the greater Washington region, new cases only recently started to slow.

"I don't know if there was ever the reasonable expectation that we would entirely bring down transmission to zero in a country this dynamic," Martin said.

Government leaders in Maryland, Virginia and the District say they won't ease shutdown restrictions until the number of new hospitalizations starts to fall. And they warn that the continued spread of the disease illustrates that when businesses, schools and retail establishments are allowed to reopen, people may need to wear masks and avoid crowds for many months to come.

State and local health departments do not publish the occupations and living conditions of everyone who tests positive, so there is no comprehensive analysis of who is getting sick. But interviews with doctors and public health officials, and data that has been made public, paint a portrait of a pandemic that increasingly is infecting those who have limited ability to socially distance.

"I had two people that work in a grocery store, one person that works in a day care and another person that works in housekeeping," said J. Luis Nunez Gallegos, assistant medical director at Unity Health Care Upper Cardozo Health Center in the District's Columbia Heights neighborhood. "They all had contact with a covid-19-positive person at work."

When he told patients to quarantine, many replied that it wasn't that simple.

"They are afraid of losing their jobs," Nunez said. "They are anxious their employers won't respect the quarantine, or that two weeks seems too long, and they don't always have the savings to get by."

Sherrell Thompson, a community health worker in a Richmond public housing community, said residents working at fast-food chains and in grocery stores don't have easy access to as many masks as they'd like for themselves and their families.

"But what can you do?" Thompson said. "You have to go to work and support your family. It's your only means of income."

The District updates the number of infected police officers and fire and EMS responders every day, and the number of infections keeps growing, albeit more slowly lately.

As of Tuesday, 88 members of the fire department had tested positive, up from 77 a week earlier, 67 on April 14 and 40 on April 7. The number of D.C. police officers with confirmed infections grew during the same period, from 31 to 59 to 86 to 92.

Members of the police and fire departments wear protective gear and have made other efforts to avoid getting infected. But they still at times come in close contact with one another and members of the public.

A Virginia man who works in public health in the region tested positive last week after spending days fitting N95 masks on health-care providers. He spoke on the condition of anonymity because his employer had not authorized him to be interviewed.

Although he washed his hands constantly, wore protective gear and kept a bottle of hand sanitizer on his desk, the man, who is now quarantined at home, said he knew he was at risk of contracting the coronavirus.

"It was a job I had to do," he said. "I'm a senior team lead in my organization, and it kind of fell upon me to be the one to go out and do it."

Andrew D. Washington, executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 20, has heard about infections among D.C. sanitation workers, paramedics who work on private contracts, and city government employees who work with the poor and disabled.

"They all are considered first responders as well and should be getting the same kudos," he said.

LaQuandra Nesbitt, the director of D.C.'s health department, said last week that about 2 percent of the city's confirmed cases involved travel, and about 5 percent involved health-care workers. Poorer neighborhoods account for an increasing share.

On March 31, wealthy Ward 3 had 70 cases, while Ward 8 — the city's poorest — had 44. As of Tuesday, Ward 3 had 270 total cases, with 55 new patients over the previous week. Ward 8's case­load had spiked nearly 14-fold to 597, with 139 added over the previous week.

Some of that shift might reflect the fact that wealthier people with better access to information and health care were quicker to get tested. But it also illustrates that those who can stay at home are now largely protected.

Increased testing also explains, to some extent, why the number of new daily cases continues to rise. "That is expected," said Laurie Forlano, Virginia's deputy commissioner of health. "Obviously we'll detect more cases, and those cases will be counted."

But health experts say the region is far from testing enough of the population to get a clear picture of who has the virus. And neither the District nor Maryland nor Virginia has enough contact-tracers in place to sketch a picture of how the coronavirus is passing through.

Each new positive patient represents a tangle of possible exposures — co-workers, family and random encounters. Tracking down those connections is the only way to isolate the spread and stop the danger, experts say.

It would help solve mysteries like that of Sharrarne Morton, a Prince George's resident who says she stayed at home and took precautions but still contracted the virus.

"The few times I did go out, I had a mask and gloves," she said. "My daughters even bought me a hand sanitizer that you put on the key ring."

Stella Jefferies, a nurse practitioner who runs a clinic in Silver Spring, said she has tested a number of patients since March 23 who cannot account for their exposure. The infections seem to stem from the community, not through travel, she said, and the cases have steadily ticked upward.

"If I have the virus, but the department of health can't contact-trace all the people who I have been in contact with and get them out of circulation, we will continue to have it in the community," said Lynn Goldman, dean of George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health.

"We haven't had the resources to do that yet."

Rachel Chason, Peter Hermann, Fenit Nirappil, Laura Vozzella and Ovetta Wiggins contributed to this report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 01, 2020, 05:50:55 AM
Rich in U.S. Grab Historic Chance to Pass On Wealth Tax-Free (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-01/rich-americans-seize-historic-chance-to-pass-on-wealth-tax-free)

Quote from: Ben StevermanRich Americans are taking advantage of an unprecedented opportunity, made possible by the coronavirus pandemic, to transfer money to their children and grandchildren tax-free.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 01, 2020, 07:41:25 AM
Just read this about problems in England in terms of people being able to get rid of their trash.  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52490195

What is it like in your area?  In my town, they cut out one day in terms of being able to haul your own trash to the dump.  They also have restricted the number of cars able to go in at one time to I think five and have a police officer there too to direct traffic.  And, of course, there's the required social distancing.  You can bring in your recyclables too; stores, however, are not currently taking in returnable recyclables (you're charged 5 cents per bottle for these), so those are piling up in people's basements/homes for the time being.  Note:  in my town, you can pay a company to pick up your trash, but I prefer to purchase a dump sticker and take it myself (you also need to purchase special bags to put household trash into too).  No extra charge for recycling.

Here's the article:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52490195

Sad to hear that it's lead to an increase in 'fly-tipping'.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 01, 2020, 07:54:44 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 01, 2020, 05:24:30 AM
China has turned to bullying to avoid accountability. It may be working on Europe. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/china-has-turned-to-bullying-to-avoid-accountability-it-may-be-working-on-europe/2020/04/30/30be39c2-8977-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html)

I am not surprised in the least.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 01, 2020, 10:14:39 AM
FEMA added individual assistance for crisis counseling to prior emergency declarations for 30 states today. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on May 01, 2020, 10:33:40 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 01, 2020, 07:41:25 AM
Just read this about problems in England in terms of people being able to get rid of their trash.  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52490195

What is it like in your area?  In my town, they cut out one day in terms of being able to haul your own trash to the dump.  They also have restricted the number of cars able to go in at one time to I think five and have a police officer there too to direct traffic.  And, of course, there's the required social distancing.  You can bring in your recyclables too; stores, however, are not currently taking in returnable recyclables (you're charged 5 cents per bottle for these), so those are piling up in people's basements/homes for the time being.  Note:  in my town, you can pay a company to pick up your trash, but I prefer to purchase a dump sticker and take it myself (you also need to purchase special bags to put household trash into too).  No extra charge for recycling.

Here's the article:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52490195

Sad to hear that it's lead to an increase in 'fly-tipping'.

PD

No excuse whatsoever for fly-tipping. Our bin collections have remained regular without interruption during the crises. It gave me great pleasure to hear this week that a fly-tipper on an industrial scale received a two year prison sentence. It is true that recycling centres have been closed - I believe they are reopening this week, but this is no excuse. Unscrupulous "entrepreneurs" out to make a few bob.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 01, 2020, 12:01:34 PM
Quote from: Irons on May 01, 2020, 10:33:40 AM
No excuse whatsoever for fly-tipping. Our bin collections have remained regular without interruption during the crises. It gave me great pleasure to hear this week that a fly-tipper on an industrial scale received a two year prison sentence. It is true that recycling centres have been closed - I believe they are reopening this week, but this is no excuse. Unscrupulous "entrepreneurs" out to make a few bob.
How does it work where you live Irons?  Do you have to pay an independent company to pick up your trash?  Or do you pay the town? Do they charge much?  Or is it included in your local taxes?  I haven't heard of any waste centers closed around here...some of the smaller towns do have very limited hours and/or days.

Agree with you that it isn't an excuse for fly-tipping!  Just surprised that they would close them at all.  What do you do if you live in a small apartment with a family to *get rid of your recyclables during these times?  Just curious here.  I also read that they might be limiting more of what kind of recyclables that they allow too (see article).
*or temporarily store them

And pleased to hear that that person received actual jail time for doing that!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 01, 2020, 12:42:34 PM
Those protesters in Michigan are at it again.  This time they didn't stay outside.
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/01/849017021/protestors-swarm-michigan-capitol-amid-showdown-over-governors-emergency-powers

BTW, according to the CNN reporter covering this, open carry of firearms is allowed inside the building, but signs aren't. 

(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/05/01/gettyimages-1211398273-531b1074a74472185e7b78758412930d80efcb60-s1200-c85.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 01, 2020, 12:58:33 PM
FDA grants remdesivir emergency use authorization for COVID-19  (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-grants-remdesivir-emergency-use-authorization-covid-19-n1197576)

Good news, but two questions:

1.) How long until the first lawsuits are filed against Gilead (any legislated immunity notwithstanding)?

2.) How many billable hours will be racked up in said lawsuits?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 01, 2020, 02:22:53 PM
Thee best thing one can do in this fade and real ''Crade et morne'' state we live in is Trought Gregorian, This is what I'm listening to chase pestillence out , the demons of illness not from china just a bad flu, reality speak out, but this poisonous aire , we may star a trend feebreze the air of poisonois air and poisonois people for the same facts, just kidding folk thee boy such a comedian, anyway  state of the art Im beyond this demon of illness and I choose when I die and I die not that easily, beat it Lucifer, whit you're darn pestilence of death, no warning shot we christian kjnow how to defend our self of poisonous air are poisonous peoples, utter snakes, bles our lord Jesus , bless Melchizedek the Holy one...

No ascendence no descendence  only god doing a cameo in the bible old testament  this was a short paranthesis on Theology.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 05:14:47 PM
Quote from: Florestan on May 01, 2020, 01:09:58 PM
Chinese eat all kind of shit. This is a fact. Then shit happens. This is also a fact.

Go ahead, sue me for racism, I can't wait for it --- I know precisely whom I'm going to call as my witnesses.

Does your attitude to the origin of the virus and "accountability" depend on the specific country, and their political system? If it had started in specific other places would you now be saying "don't politicize the tragedy" and talking of "freak occurrence" and "act of god"?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 05:18:48 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 01, 2020, 12:42:34 PM
Those protesters in Michigan are at it again.  This time they didn't stay outside.
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/01/849017021/protestors-swarm-michigan-capitol-amid-showdown-over-governors-emergency-powers

BTW, according to the CNN reporter covering this, open carry of firearms is allowed inside the building, but signs aren't. 

(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/05/01/gettyimages-1211398273-531b1074a74472185e7b78758412930d80efcb60-s1200-c85.jpg)

Now imagine if the people in that photo were identified as "Antifa".

(have I said that already to a similar photo? I feel like I might have)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 05:27:46 PM
'You think we care about masks?': anger and poverty grip Lebanese city
Tripoli, a hub of peaceful protest last October, is at the centre of a struggle to survive amid coranavirus  (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/01/care-about-masks-anger-poverty-grip-lebanese-city-tripoli-coronavirus)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 01, 2020, 06:45:51 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 01, 2020, 12:42:34 PM
Those protesters in Michigan are at it again.  This time they didn't stay outside.
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/01/849017021/protestors-swarm-michigan-capitol-amid-showdown-over-governors-emergency-powers

BTW, according to the CNN reporter covering this, open carry of firearms is allowed inside the building, but signs aren't. 

(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/05/01/gettyimages-1211398273-531b1074a74472185e7b78758412930d80efcb60-s1200-c85.jpg)

I think that guy with the Mohawk has seen Taxi Driver too many times and still doesn't understand it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 02, 2020, 12:47:58 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 01, 2020, 12:42:34 PM
Those protesters in Michigan are at it again.  This time they didn't stay outside.
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/01/849017021/protestors-swarm-michigan-capitol-amid-showdown-over-governors-emergency-powers

BTW, according to the CNN reporter covering this, open carry of firearms is allowed inside the building, but signs aren't. 

(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/05/01/gettyimages-1211398273-531b1074a74472185e7b78758412930d80efcb60-s1200-c85.jpg)

You live in a scary country....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 02, 2020, 01:26:22 AM
New data on the development of daily  (official) mortality in various contries.
Note the steady rise in Brazil! The curve of US is in (a slow) decline.

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fd2e2d892-896e-11ea-9dcb-fe6871f4145a?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 02, 2020, 02:37:00 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 01, 2020, 05:14:47 PM
Does your attitude to the origin of the virus and "accountability" depend on the specific country, and their political system? If it had started in specific other places would you now be saying "don't politicize the tragedy" and talking of "freak occurrence" and "act of god"?

If the virus had originated in Romania and the Romanian government had tried to cover up the whole mess I'd have been equally indignant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 02, 2020, 03:09:59 AM
Very clever reply, Andrei. You're actually saying  that the Chinese government has made a coverup. But, TBH, we don't know, and probably cannot know (as much as many wish this to be the truth).

Good day to you, my friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on May 02, 2020, 04:19:38 AM
Quote from: Que on May 02, 2020, 01:26:22 AM
New data on the development of daily  (official) mortality in various contries.
Note the steady rise in Brazil! The curve of US is in (a slow) decline.

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fd2e2d892-896e-11ea-9dcb-fe6871f4145a?fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

USA! USA! USA! We're number one! I resent that the logarithmic scale used in the graph obscures how far we are ahead of any other country! More than twice the death rate of the next contender. In fact, we're probably the reason they had to use a logarithmic scale to begin with, otherwise there would be a page of blank space between the US and the next most incompetent nation. USA! USA! We are truly exceptional.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 05:31:29 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on May 02, 2020, 04:19:38 AM
USA! USA! USA! We're number one! I resent that the logarithmic scale used in the graph obscures how far we are ahead of any other country! More than twice the death rate of the next contender. In fact, we're probably the reason they had to use a logarithmic scale to begin with, otherwise there would be a page of blank space between the US and the next most incompetent nation. USA! USA! We are truly exceptional.


This post explains rather a lot.

Back in the real world, as lockdowns start being lifted a bit in various locales, it is time to revisit some meaningful numbers. 

The observed case fatality ratio of the ten most affected countries, per Johns Hopkins:

Belgium - 15.7%
UK - 15.4%
France - 14.7%
Italy - 13.6%
Netherlands - 12.3%
Spain - 11.5%
Brazil - 7.0%
Iran - 6.4%
US - 5.9%
Germany - 4.1%


The deaths per 100K population are:

Belgium - 67.44
Spain - 52.53
Italy - 46.72
UK - 41.49
France - 36.77
Netherlands - 28.49
US - 19.85
Germany - 8.12
Iran - 7.45
Brazil - 3.06

As the world moves into a nervous summer and probable drops in reported cases and deaths, a few things seem clear before the second wave hits in October/November:

1.) Public health officials from developed nations should consult with Germans.  They did something right.

2.) Belgians have trouble counting.

3.) With the notable exception of Germany, Europe as whole failed.  This is unsurprising.  This should and will have appropriate long-term geopolitical consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 02, 2020, 06:21:06 AM
Quote from: Irons on May 01, 2020, 10:33:40 AM
No excuse whatsoever for fly-tipping. Our bin collections have remained regular without interruption during the crises. It gave me great pleasure to hear this week that a fly-tipper on an industrial scale received a two year prison sentence. It is true that recycling centres have been closed - I believe they are reopening this week, but this is no excuse. Unscrupulous "entrepreneurs" out to make a few bob.
Irons,

I should add (to clarify matters), that by recyclables in my earlier comment/question, that I was thinking more of everyday stuff like paper, cans and bottles, juice cartons...stuff like that...which can add up quite quickly.  I think, if I'm remembering correctly, that a mutual British friend mentioned that where he lives at least, that your everyday household waste gets sorted (by the owner) into bins which then gets picked up and that was, I'm guessing, what you were referring to?  Here, we have three different areas/stations:  one is for brush and leaves and grass (open seasonally); second one has various bins for things like metal (like stoves and misc. scrap metal), misc. scraps/debris from house projects, old and unusable furniture...they also take in tires, some hazardous waste, etc., refrigerators, etc.  Various charges for things like this.  These two station/locations have been closed for some time.  The third location is open (with slightly reduced hours) for bags of household trash, there's a compost area (for dropping off), a big metal compactor for paper/cardboard, a big dumpster for recyclables like juice cartons, empty food cans, plastic food packaging, etc. and another dumpster for smallish metal items (no big things like stoves!).

What I was wondering about earlier (particularly after reading that BBC article) was how folks were coping re trash and regular household recyclables (not things like tires and mattresses and so on....though those things can add up particularly if one doesn't live in a very big place).

Perhaps I initially misunderstood that article.  It sounded to me like there could be issues with trash (including bottles, paper, etc.) not getting picked up?  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-52490195

In any event, glad that all is well chez vous.

Speaking of trash, I need to gather up mine and get it ready to take to the transfer station.   :)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on May 02, 2020, 06:26:04 AM
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-belgium-carehomes/belgium-records-half-of-coronavirus-deaths-in-nursing-homes-idUSL3N2C22UY

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-belgium-death-toll-lockdown-trump-who-uk-spain-italy-a9494186.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 02, 2020, 06:30:34 AM
Quote from: pjme on May 02, 2020, 06:26:04 AM
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-belgium-carehomes/belgium-records-half-of-coronavirus-deaths-in-nursing-homes-idUSL3N2C22UY

It's the same in Quebec. All deaths suspected to be caused by coronavirus, even indirectly, are reported in our statistics. And most of them are from nursing homes. Other countries have different methods of calculation. Charts comparing countries' coronavirus deaths are totally unreliable and misleading.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 06:36:41 AM
Quote from: pjme on May 02, 2020, 06:26:04 AM
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-belgium-carehomes/belgium-records-half-of-coronavirus-deaths-in-nursing-homes-idUSL3N2C22UY

Along similar lines: 'Our patients are dropping like flies': 16,000 dead from COVID-19 in U.S. nursing homes (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2020/05/01/coronavirus-nursing-homes-more-states-pressured-name-facilities/3062537001/)


I guess it took this pandemic to make conditions in nursing homes a news story.  One of the byproducts of having a goodly number of family members working in health care is that one learns about these things first hand.  Back in the 90s, my wife spent half a decade doing administrative work in two nursing homes.  Every flu season, between 20-25% of patients died.  The worst year saw 40% die, and the facility had to lay off staff.  The high-end nursing home, which shared a parking lot with the more humdrum one my wife worked at, had lower fatality rates, but not by much.  The elderly are put in nursing homes to die.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on May 02, 2020, 06:38:40 AM
I haven't looked through everything here. This has probably come up. But the effect of no publics events on the concert work, especially if it goes for 2 or three years...coupled with the decline of the recording industry. That goes for sports, ballet, etc.
But as classical music is the topic...I just wonder how truly awful it'll be for musicians.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 02, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 02, 2020, 03:09:59 AM
Very clever reply, Andrei. You're actually saying  that the Chinese government has made a coverup. But, TBH, we don't know, and probably cannot know (as much as many wish this to be the truth).

Excuse me? The attempt at covering it up right from the beginning is well documented. Have you not heard about the famous Dr. Li and his treatment at the hands of the local CCP officials?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 02, 2020, 06:55:33 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 02, 2020, 05:31:29 AM

This post explains rather a lot.

Back in the real world, as lockdowns start being lifted a bit in various locales, it is time to revisit some meaningful numbers. 

The observed case fatality ratio of the ten most affected countries, per Johns Hopkins:

Belgium - 15.7%
UK - 15.4%
France - 14.7%
Italy - 13.6%
Netherlands - 12.3%
Spain - 11.5%
Brazil - 7.0%
Iran - 6.4%
US - 5.9%
Germany - 4.1%


The deaths per 100K population are:

Belgium - 67.44
Spain - 52.53
Italy - 46.72
UK - 41.49
France - 36.77
Netherlands - 28.49
US - 19.85
Germany - 8.12
Iran - 7.45
Brazil - 3.06

As the world moves into a nervous summer and probable drops in reported cases and deaths, a few things seem clear before the second wave hits in October/November:

1.) Public health officials from developed nations should consult with Germans.  They did something right.

2.) Belgians have trouble counting.

3.) With the notable exception of Germany, Europe as whole failed.  This is unsurprising.  This should and will have appropriate long-term geopolitical consequences.

I saw figures for deaths per 100k which put Sweden about equal  to or slightly better than the Netherlands, and Finland, Norway, and Denmark close to Germany.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 02, 2020, 06:59:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 02, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
Excuse me? The attempt at covering it up right from the beginning is well documented. Have you not heard about the famous Dr. Li and his treatment at the hands of the local CCP officials?

There seem to be two layers to the problem:  local officials in Wuhan trying to obfuscate information sent to the national level, and the national government's approach to informing the rest of the world. Between the two, we probably will never know.  The Chinese themselves may never know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 07:10:18 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 02, 2020, 06:55:33 AM
I saw figures for deaths per 100k which put Sweden about equal  to or slightly better than the Netherlands, and Finland, Norway, and Denmark close to Germany.


Yes, and Sweden did not lockdown like other countries.  More complete first wave statistics - not just fatalities, of course, but also hospital utilization rates, and the like - are needed to more fully understand the merits and demerits of Sweden's approach before the second wave hits. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on May 02, 2020, 07:12:39 AM
Quote from: milk on May 02, 2020, 06:38:40 AM
I haven't looked through everything here. This has probably come up. But the effect of no publics events on the concert work, especially if it goes for 2 or three years...coupled with the decline of the recording industry. That goes for sports, ballet, etc.
But as classical music is the topic...I just wonder how truly awful it'll be for musicians.

They just cancelled Ravinia for the whole summer:

https://chicagoclassicalreview.com/2020/05/ravinia-cancels-entire-2020-season/

This is a real downer. I had some hope the summer would be somewhat normal and we might be able to go to a concert or two. What this means for the musicians, I don't know. CSO musicians and staff are still being paid, but everyone had to take a cut. How long can this go on?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on May 02, 2020, 07:14:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 01, 2020, 12:01:34 PM
How does it work where you live Irons?  Do you have to pay an independent company to pick up your trash?  Or do you pay the town? Do they charge much?  Or is it included in your local taxes?  I haven't heard of any waste centers closed around here...some of the smaller towns do have very limited hours and/or days.

Agree with you that it isn't an excuse for fly-tipping!  Just surprised that they would close them at all.  What do you do if you live in a small apartment with a family to *get rid of your recyclables during these times?  Just curious here.  I also read that they might be limiting more of what kind of recyclables that they allow too (see article).
*or temporarily store them

And pleased to hear that that person received actual jail time for doing that!

PD

Included in the rates, P. Which is as you say a local tax. We also (choose to) pay an extra £50 a year for garden waste collection once every two weeks. This is an excellent investment as I add weeds from the allotment too. When overfull I climb into the bin with aid of step ladder and dance on top to compress it down and add more. Time I'm finished it is very heavy!

Rubbish and recyclables are collected on alternate weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 02, 2020, 07:17:28 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 02, 2020, 06:55:33 AM
I saw figures for deaths per 100k which put Sweden about equal  to or slightly better than the Netherlands, and Finland, Norway, and Denmark close to Germany.

Deaths per million population

Netherlands - 291
Sweden - 264
Denmark - 82
Germany - 80
Finland - 40
Norway - 39
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 07:18:47 AM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on May 02, 2020, 07:12:39 AMHow long can this go on?

America should be ready for 18 months of shutdowns in 'long, hard road' ahead, warns the Fed's Neel Kashkari (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/america-should-be-ready-for-18-months-of-shutdowns-in-long-hard-road-ahead-warns-the-feds-neel-kashkari-2020-04-12)

Though not a public health official, I consider Mr Kashkari a serious man who has taken on serious crisis responsibilities in his career.  I expect 18-24 more months.  Maybe more.  I hope I am wrong and it lasts only a few more months. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 02, 2020, 12:48:45 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 02, 2020, 06:59:49 AM
There seem to be two layers to the problem:  local officials in Wuhan trying to obfuscate information sent to the national level, and the national government's approach to informing the rest of the world. Between the two, we probably will never know.  The Chinese themselves may never know.

By the end of December local health officials knew something alarming was happening, through the middle of January local politicians were trying to suppress the information. By the end of January the national government became aware of the gravity of the situation and took decisive action. On January 28 all travel in and out of the province was shut down and a few days later people were confined to their homes. That was done in full view of the world. By February are 2 the virus was identified and sequencesd, and by February 9 the sequence was published. The National government may be under reporting the number of infected but I see no evidence they under reported the severity of the disease.

You can argue the actions of the provincial government delayed the response by some weeks. The United States had full information about the nature of the disease by February 1  and took nearly two months to take decisive action. In the United States the local authorities were ahead of the federal authorities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 02, 2020, 02:21:06 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 02, 2020, 05:31:29 AM

Back in the real world, as lockdowns start being lifted a bit in various locales, it is time to revisit some meaningful numbers.

I don't agree these are meaningful numbers.

The current case-fatality ratios are totally unreliable.
Because the number of cases (of infection) is without nation-wide testing a completely wild guess, as is the the number of fatalities -  usualy consisting of confirmed patients dying in hospitals. In time, more accurate numbers can be achieved by comparing estimated infection rates, based on nationwide blood testing on antibodies, with statistically based numbers of excess deaths during the outbreak.

The relative number of deaths in the country is dependent on the initial level and geographical spread of the infection.
A small urbanised country with large outside exposure - like Belgium or the Netherlands (or the State of NY) - will naturally score badly, a big country with large rural areas - like the (entirety of the) US, Brazil or Iran - well score relatively well.
Influencing the death rate, there are probably some predisposed factors linked to the composition of the population, like average age, general health, genetical factors, and possibly previous vaccinations.

The reponses of countries should IMO be judged mainly by looking at the extent and speed in which they were able to contain the spread of the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 02:35:40 PM
Quote from: Que on May 02, 2020, 02:21:06 PM
I don't agree these are meaningful numbers.


Then we will have to agree to disagree, and clearly medical professionals see fit to track the information.  The figures are useful as rolling snapshots as the pandemic develops, and as testing expands the data will change and provide a more useful understanding of what has happened, and may be useful in resource allocation. 

The idea that a small, urbanized country with large outside exposure will naturally score worse does not fit with the data.  South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan have all done a much better job of dealing with the crisis than European countries.  Israel has, too.  The pandemic has exposed some severe flaws in how the West handles medical crises. 


Quote from: Que on May 02, 2020, 02:21:06 PMand possibly previous vaccinations.


How does this apply here?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 02, 2020, 03:17:09 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 02, 2020, 12:48:45 PMBy the end of December local health officials knew something alarming was happening, through the middle of December local politicians were trying to suppress the information. By the end of January the national government became aware of the gravity of the situation and took decisive action. On January 28 all travel in and out of the province was shut down and a few days later people were confined to their homes. That was done in full view of the world. By February are 2 the virus was identified and sequencesd, and by February 9 the sequence was published. The National government may be under reporting the number of infected but I see no evidence they under reported the severity of the disease.

You can argue the actions of the provincial government delayed the response by some weeks. The United States had full information about the nature of the disease by February 1  and took nearly two months to take decisive action. In the United States the local authorities were ahead of the federal authorities.


There is something off about the timeline you describe.

US alerted Israel, NATO to disease outbreak in China in November — TV report (https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-alerted-israel-nato-to-disease-outbreak-in-china-in-november-report/)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 02, 2020, 04:43:44 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 02, 2020, 03:17:09 PM

There is something off about the timeline you describe.

US alerted Israel, NATO to disease outbreak in China in November — TV report (https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-alerted-israel-nato-to-disease-outbreak-in-china-in-november-report/)

That is an interesting report (although the supposed source of the intelligence denies it). I have read that CDC officials believe that the first cases were in November or earlier but were not recognized as a new disease at the time. I suspect that intelligence sources may have noticed an uptick in respiratory infections, but that the association with the novel coronavirus came in retrospect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 03, 2020, 12:27:34 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 02, 2020, 02:35:40 PM
The idea that a small, urbanized country with large outside exposure will naturally score worse does not fit with the data.  South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan have all done a much better job of dealing with the crisis than European countries.  Israel has, too.  The pandemic has exposed some severe flaws in how the West handles medical crises.

Oh, but we agree about that! Fortunately the examples you mention show that even if there are high risk factors, like high outside exposure and urbanisation, containment measures can be very effective. And yes, the entire Western world failed in handling the crisis by being unprepared and too slow. And the US was probably the slowest of them all, especially given the fact that it had a few weeks of foresight about what would happen. My point was that comparing the numbers of a country like Belgium with the entire US doesn't tell you much about the effectiveness of any contaimment measures. A more fair comparison would be with New York. Of the three countries at the bottom of your 100K list - Germany, Brazil and Iran - the last two have actually handled the crisis poorly.

QuoteHow does this apply here?

There are indications thay being inoculated with certain vaccines creates a hightened resistance against COVID-19.
Mentioned are the vaccine against tuberculosis, even if that is not a virus, but more specifically a vaccine that children get against mumps, measles and ruberalla. Vaccination programmes differ between countries and age groups. So this may be a possible factor.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 03, 2020, 12:50:37 AM
Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 12:27:34 AM


And yes, the entire Western world failed in handling the crisis by being unprepared and too slow.

Q

Apart from Germany
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 03, 2020, 01:13:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 03, 2020, 12:50:37 AM
Apart from Germany

I've seen several explanations of the positive example of Germany.
It seems to have been a combination of factors: the outbreak came a bit later to Germany than to surrounding countries; the first wave of cases was relatively modest in size and consisted of relatively young people who had been skiing in Austria and Italy; Germany had a large preexisting test capacity and used that right away for testing and tracking patients down and prevent further spreading; Germany has a large (decentralised) and high quality health care system that was sufficiently able to handle patients.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 01:19:22 AM
I think it was a lot of dumb luck. The German minister of Health and most of the experts were asleep at the wheel in January and until late February like almost everyone else.
I am still doubtful about the impact of the diverse lockdown measures (because all these curves are so damn similar, they should be far more diverse depending on when which measure of distancing etc. was established) but another point is probably that the Germans are usually obedient. Lenin famously quipped more than 100 years ago that there would never be a revolution in Germany because Germany would not even step on the lawn if there was a sign forbidding it and this is to a certain extent still true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 01:36:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 03, 2020, 12:50:37 AM
Apart from Germany

If forgetting a good deal of other, but smaller countries in the Western World.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 01:44:10 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 01:19:22 AM
I think it was a lot of dumb luck. The German minister of Health and most of the experts were asleep at the wheel in January and until late February like almost everyone else.
I am still doubtful about the impact of the diverse lockdown measures (because all these curves are so damn similar, they should be far more diverse depending on when which measure of distancing etc. was established) but another point is probably that the Germans are usually obedient. Lenin famously quipped more than 100 years ago that there would never be a revolution in Germany because Germany would not even step on the lawn if there was a sign forbidding it and this is to a certain extent still true.

The lockdown measures have saved many 1000s of lives, also due to the heightened awareness among the public, of general safety measures. There's an obvious example up here, by comparing Sweden's death tolls with its neighbouring countries. Sweden has had a different strategy with much less lockdown. Also, its measuring statistics and testings generally leave a lot to be desired by comparison. This in spite of Swedes having likewise a popular, general reputation of being ~obedient people too.

Below, Swedish numbers might very well be considerably larger, whereas the Danish numbers might be slightly lower (since all fatalities with any Corona diagnosis are counted here in Denmark).

Updates: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (Swedish numbers during weekends tend to be low, since the reporting system is slow on those days)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 03, 2020, 02:28:58 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 01:19:22 AM
I think it was a lot of dumb luck. The German minister of Health and most of the experts were asleep at the wheel in January and until late February like almost everyone else.
[...] another point is probably that the Germans are usually obedient. Lenin famously quipped more than 100 years ago that there would never be a revolution in Germany

It helped, I guess, that Merkel is a good leader who explained the benefits of lockdown well.

The other thing of course is that Germany had big reserves in hospital beds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 03:13:11 AM
Don't know if this link has been given here before, but:

An interesting site with predictions for future developments in many countries, unusually optimistic and suggesting a fairly quick recovery within a few months
(Germany, France and Spain by the end of May,
UK, USA, Italy and NL in mid-June,
Sweden by the end of July).

https://ddi.sutd.edu.sg/

However these predictions are with the current lock-downs in place, & the exact background for the calculations (mainly mathematical?) is difficult to relate to. They are from Singapore University.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 03, 2020, 03:33:18 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 01:36:15 AM
If forgetting a good deal of other, but smaller countries in the Western World.

I think most of those countires had a small problem to begin with, which makes it much easier to keep it that way.

Except for Sweden, that started out with a small problem which has steadily been growing.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on May 03, 2020, 04:46:06 AM
Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 12:27:34 AM

There are indications thay being inoculated with certain vaccines creates a hightened resistance against COVID-19.
Mentioned are the vaccine against tuberculosis, even if that is not a virus, but more specifically a vaccine that children get against mumps, measles and ruberalla. Vaccination programmes differ between countries and age groups. So this may be a possible factor.

Q
There's a lot of talk about that here in Japan where my kids get, I think it's, BCG or BGC vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 04:55:52 AM
I think Merkel gets way too much credit, most of which should probably go to administrative and medical infrastructure far lower down.
There are a lot of unknowns overall, so the extremely different numbers in some countries still seem puzzling to me.
Among other things it seems to me that the fact of extreme regional hotspots like NYC/NJ in the US and certain regions in Italy, France and Spain has not been sufficiently researched and appreciated. Also more local smaller concentrations in nursery homes etc. The cases and especially the deaths seem often very much concentrated in certain areas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2020, 05:07:12 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 01:19:22 AM
I think it was a lot of dumb luck. The German minister of Health and most of the experts were asleep at the wheel in January and until late February like almost everyone else.
I am still doubtful about the impact of the diverse lockdown measures (because all these curves are so damn similar, they should be far more diverse depending on when which measure of distancing etc. was established) but another point is probably that the Germans are usually obedient. Lenin famously quipped more than 100 years ago that there would never be a revolution in Germany because Germany would not even step on the lawn if there was a sign forbidding it and this is to a certain extent still true.

Thanks.  Of course, in these times, especially, I begrudge no one a littl dumb luck  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 03, 2020, 05:13:15 AM
Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 12:27:34 AMA more fair comparison would be with New York.


A more fair comparison is South Korea.  Again, my main point is that many European governments, despite their supposedly superior governance and health care delivery systems, have done terrible jobs in this crisis.   

Incidentally, I never indicated that Iran and Brazil have handled the crisis well.  I simply listed the top ten countries as reported by Johns Hopkins.  I have severe doubts about the accuracy of the statistics reported by Iran, for instance.


Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 12:27:34 AMThere are indications thay being inoculated with certain vaccines creates a hightened resistance against COVID-19.


It will be most informative over the next 3, 6, 12 months to see if other vaccinations do have a statistically meaningful impact on the spread of Covid.  This could become more important if development of a Covid vaccine takes longer than hoped for.  That is a distinct possibility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on May 03, 2020, 05:29:07 AM
Why is it that Covid-19 is more prevalent in supposedly rich countries while Africa and India have got off relatively lightly? 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 03, 2020, 05:38:13 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 03, 2020, 05:07:12 AM
Thanks.  Of course, in these times, especially, I begrudge no one a littl dumb luck  :)
Better 'dumb luck' than 'no luck at all'!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 05:40:08 AM
They have a very different demography, far fewer people >70 yo that make up most of the deaths. And it could be the climate if the virus like similar ones is destroyed quickly by sun/UV rays or also higher temperatures. Then there could be better immunity among people having grown up and living in less sanitzed conditions. Finally, the medical and administrative systems of most of these countries are so underdeveloped that they simply cannot test and evaluate enough, so the data are certainly not very reliable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 03, 2020, 05:49:14 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 04:55:52 AM
I think Merkel gets way too much credit, most of which should probably go to administrative and medical infrastructure far lower down.

That is what she is supposed to do, listen to and support scientific and medical infrastructure. Our president let is own uninformed notions supersede scientific and public health response and the result is one of the worst outbreaks in the developed world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 03, 2020, 05:58:08 AM
Quote from: Irons on May 03, 2020, 05:29:07 AM
Why is it that Covid-19 is more prevalent in supposedly rich countries while Africa and India have got off relatively lightly?
Good question Irons!  I'm trying to look into it .....so far found this about testing across Africa.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52478344

I'm not so certain that they've gotten off lightly though...

Would need to know and compare rates of testing in the various countries vs. other non-African countries...also percentage of population testing positive...density of population in different areas, etc.  Also, how well they've been keeping track of who has been infected by it and who has died from it.  And how they've been trying to keep it from spreading.

So far, found this re India:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52505436

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 03, 2020, 06:08:37 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 03, 2020, 05:13:15 AM

A more fair comparison is South Korea.  Again, my main point is that many European governments, despite their supposedly superior governance and health care delivery systems, have done terrible jobs in this crisis.

South Korea, or Taiwan, is definitely the standard to which other countries fall short in comparison.

Not implying any insult to those who take pride in their national healthcare systems, but it it seems that once a country failed to act promptly and effectively and got overrun  by the virus, the quality of its healthcare system was not really a significant factor anymore. The worst affected region in Italy has plenty and most excellent hospitals, but in the end it didn't make much of a difference.

IMO Western authorities got lulled into sleep by the fact that previous SARS outbreaks were limited to Asia.
The exceptionalist psychology of "that won't happen here", in combination with a reluctance to invest political and real capital into preparing for a crisis that might not have materialized, did us all in.

A greater independence for healthcare authorities with separate longterm budgets might be a good idea.
And investing public money in fundamental, preemptive research on infectious diseases.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 03, 2020, 06:13:01 AM
Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 06:08:37 AM
South Korea, or Taiwan, is definitely the standard to which other countries fall short in comparison.

Not implying any insult to those who take prude in their national healthcare systems, but it it seems that once a country failed to act promptly and effectively and got overrun  by the virus, the quality of its healthcare system was not really a significant factor anymore. The worst affected region in Italy has plenty and most excellent hospitals, but in the end it didn't make much of a difference.

IMO Western authorities got lulled into sleep by the fact that previous SARS outbreaks were limited to Asia.
The exceptionalist psychology of "that won't happen here", in combination with a reluctance to invest political and real capital into preparing for a crisis that might not have materialized, did us all in.

A greater independence for healthcare authorities with separate longterm budgets might be a good idea.
And investing public money in fundamental, preemptive research on infectious diseases.

Q

+1 on all the points you raise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 03, 2020, 06:18:52 AM
Quote from: Que on May 03, 2020, 06:08:37 AM
A greater independence for healthcare authorities with separate longterm budgets might be a good idea.

And investing public money in fundamental, preemptive research on infectious diseases.


The former idea will mean different things in different regions, of course, and in some US states, enhanced and restructured state level funding will be an easy political sell, and in others it will not be.   

More money for research is always a good idea, and it can be a mix of public and private funds.  I suspect in the US that some deep pocketed donors will pour money into research, treatment, and so forth.  It is already happening where I live.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2020, 06:20:12 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 03, 2020, 05:38:13 AM
Better 'dumb luck' than 'no luck at all'!

Verily!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 03, 2020, 08:01:25 AM
A couple articles from The Gray Lady, so they may not be true:

Global Backlash Builds Against China Over Coronavirus (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/europe/backlash-china-coronavirus.html?action=click&auth=login-email&login=email&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage)

The Covid-19 Riddle: Why Does the Virus Wallop Some Places and Spare Others? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/europe/backlash-china-coronavirus.html?action=click&auth=login-email&login=email&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 08:17:20 AM
Besides the Remdesivir drug effects, hopeful news coming from a Norwegian-British company, BerGenBio, claiming that with 80% certainty, they have a 'revolutionary, virus-hindering pill, Bemcentinib', with the results of bigger test likely coming at the end of June.

Also, Swiss Roche's drug Tocilizumab is apparently able to reduce the human body's own, anti-virus - but at the same time self-harming - reactions.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8281109/Tiny-Oxford-firm-extremely-optimistic-pill-developed-combat-coronavirus.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2020, 08:29:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 08:17:20 AM
Besides the Remdesivir drug effects, hopeful news coming from a Norwegian-British company, BerGenBio, claiming that with 80% certainty, they have a 'revolutionary, virus-hindering pill, Bemcentinib, with the results of bigger test likely coming at the end of June.

Also, Swiss Roche's drug Tocilizumab is apparently able to reduce the human body's own, anti-virus - but at the same time self-harming - reactions.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8281109/Tiny-Oxford-firm-extremely-optimistic-pill-developed-combat-coronavirus.html



Cool!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 03, 2020, 08:50:44 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 03, 2020, 01:36:15 AM
If forgetting a good deal of other, but smaller countries in the Western World.

And India.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 03, 2020, 08:54:30 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 03, 2020, 02:28:58 AM.

The other thing of course is that Germany had big reserves in hospital beds.

In the UK we never had a problem with ICU beds, and in France neither (though I believe they came close on the night of March 31)

That's the official line, maybe in the UK it's misleading because possibly people in nursing homes weren't admitted to hospital - but maybe they were not in a fit state for intubation anyway, and getting a less invasive intensive care in their homes. It's complicated.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 03, 2020, 09:50:39 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 30, 2020, 09:37:22 PM
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf

QuoteTheories of SARS-CoV-2 origins
It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged
through laboratory manipulation of a
related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As
noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is
optimized for binding to human ACE2 with
an efficient solution different from those
previously predicted7,11. Furthermore, if
genetic manipulation had been performed,
one of the several reverse-genetic systems
available for betacoronaviruses would
probably have been used19. However, the
genetic data irrefutably show that SARSCoV-2 is not derived from any previously
used virus backbone20. Instead, we propose
two scenarios that can plausibly explain
the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural
selection in an animal host before zoonotic
transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans
following zoonotic transfer. We also discuss
whether selection during passage could have
given rise to SARS-CoV-2.

That was long, so I just checked out that paragraph, which I suppose is the main point.

I give up trying to explain. The second lab theory has nothing to do with genetic manipulation. They were researching, doesn't mean they were necessarily manipulating anything. Yet again the first lab theory is being confused for the second. The second theory asserts that it 100% came from nature. Why even bother discussing this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 03, 2020, 02:48:34 PM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 09:50:39 AM
That was long, so I just checked out that paragraph, which I suppose is the main point.

I give up trying to explain. The second lab theory has nothing to do with genetic manipulation. They were researching, doesn't mean they were necessarily manipulating anything. Yet again the first lab theory is being confused for the second. The second theory asserts that it 100% came from nature. Why even bother discussing this.

     So what is the second lab theory? Was it something like the patient samples went to the lab in late December, then escaped from the lab somehow, and then the pandemic came from both the early patients and a lab accident? I would never say it couldn't happen, but it does look like the lab part is a little bit superfluous. You already have what it takes to start the epidemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 03, 2020, 04:48:57 PM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 09:50:39 AMI give up trying to explain. The second lab theory has nothing to do with genetic manipulation. They were researching, doesn't mean they were necessarily manipulating anything. Yet again the first lab theory is being confused for the second. The second theory asserts that it 100% came from nature. Why even bother discussing this.

What they are saying, I believe, is that artificial manipulation of a RNA virus genome would have to be done using one of a finite number of known techniques. They did not find find the artifacts left behind by those techniques. They conclude there is no reason to believe it was anything but a naturally occurring mutation. Normally a virus must mutate to target a new host. There are two possibilities. A virus in host A mutates to a form that more readily infects host B. Or a virus from host A infects host B and mutates to a form which is more effective in host B. Both are known to occur in nature, and less likely to occur in a lab than in a natural setting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 03, 2020, 05:10:03 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 03, 2020, 02:48:34 PM
     So what is the second lab theory? Was it something like the patient samples went to the lab in late December, then escaped from the lab somehow, and then the pandemic came from both the early patients and a lab accident? I would never say it couldn't happen, but it does look like the lab part is a little bit superfluous. You already have what it takes to start the epidemic.

As I understand it, the second lab theory is simply that someone at the lab became infected via a lab accident of some sort, and unknowingly started spreading the virus among the general population. The fact that many of the early cases had a connection to the wet market is essentially a random event, and probably signifies nothing more  than that the infected lab worker shopped there at least once while contagious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 03, 2020, 05:28:58 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 03, 2020, 02:48:34 PM
     So what is the second lab theory? Was it something like the patient samples went to the lab in late December, then escaped from the lab somehow, and then the pandemic came from both the early patients and a lab accident? I would never say it couldn't happen, but it does look like the lab part is a little bit superfluous. You already have what it takes to start the epidemic.
Well, it was related to the reports that the bats "bled and peed on the researchers," which could be all it took to infect a human (if safety procedures aren't followed 100%). It could have even happened while they were in the caves retrieving the bats (assuming the researchers are also the people retrieving them- that part is unclear), so if that were the case, it could even be referred to as a different name instead of the "second lab theory."

And once one human is infected then the rest is history. I don't think there was any suspicion of actual samples of the viruses leaking from the lab or anything like that.


Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 03, 2020, 04:48:57 PM
What they are saying, I believe, is that artificial manipulation of a RNA virus genome would have to be done using one of a finite number of known techniques. They did not find find the artifacts left behind by those techniques. They conclude there is no reason to believe it was anything but a naturally occurring mutation. Normally a virus must mutate to target a new host. There are two possibilities. A virus in host A mutates to a form that more readily infects host B. Or a virus from host A infects host B and mutates to a form which is more effective in host B. Both are known to occur in nature, and less likely to occur in a lab than in a natural setting.
Either I'm not getting it or there isn't a difference.  :)

The second lab theory would imply that all mutations were natural, among the bats since of course they share viruses among each other. Once it became ready after whatever mutations it was transmitted to a human.

Is it transmission or mutation we're talking about that is "less likely to occur in a lab setting?" And what exactly is different about a lab setting than nature- just human to bat contact?

I already got that part "no artifacts left behind" a long time ago which disproves the first lab theory.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 03, 2020, 05:32:48 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 03, 2020, 05:10:03 PM
As I understand it, the second lab theory is simply that someone at the lab became infected via a lab accident of some sort, and unknowingly started spreading the virus among the general population. The fact that many of the early cases had a connection to the wet market is essentially a random event, and probably signifies nothing more  than that the infected lab worker shopped there at least once while contagious.
Thanks for the explanation.  :)

I think the overload of information on this thread is confusing people, leading to having to re-explain things... which reaaalllly tests my patience. I'm not good at that type of stuff.  :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on May 03, 2020, 05:57:06 PM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 05:28:58 PM
Well, it was related to the reports that the bats "bled and peed on the researchers," which could be all it took to infect a human (if safety procedures aren't followed 100%). It could have even happened while they were in the caves retrieving the bats (assuming the researchers are also the people retrieving them- that part is unclear), so if that were the case, it could even be referred to as a different name instead of the "second lab theory."

And once one human is infected then the rest is history. I don't think there was any suspicion of actual samples of the viruses leaking from the lab or anything like that.

I heard an interview on NPR with a man who had been present during some "bat retrieving" in the caves. He said the lab people wore full protective gear. Alas, the cave was also full of tourists dressed in casual holiday clothes with no protective gear whatever. So, of course it must be the researchers. Conspiracy logic demands it. ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 03, 2020, 06:31:01 PM
There is no way in hell that workers in a viriology lab would ever be in a position where they get "bled and peed on".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 03, 2020, 07:22:54 PM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 05:28:58 PM
Well, it was related to the reports that the bats "bled and peed on the researchers," which could be all it took to infect a human (if safety procedures aren't followed 100%).

     They were sent samples from patients, not bats. They didn't match older bat viruses, ones the lab had studied. The virus had been circulating for more than a month before the lab identified it as new, as far back as early November.

     What I think is most likely is the virus was first transmitted from bats to humans a thousand miles from Wuhan. Bat to human transmission didn't start at the lab or the market. It was brought to the market from some distance away by a human host. No bats need apply.

     The probability that the virus went directly from a bat to a researcher has to be far lower than transmission from a bat to an unprotected civilian.

     If the timeline don't fit, you must acquit:

The mysterious patient samples arrived at the Wuhan Institute of Virology at 7 P.M. on December 30, 2019. Moments later Shi Zhengli's cell phone rang. It was her boss, the institute's director. The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention had detected a novel coronavirus in two hospital patients with atypical pneumonia, and it wanted Shi's renowned laboratory to investigate. If the finding was confirmed, the new pathogen could pose a serious public health threat—because it belonged to the same family of viruses as the one that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a disease that plagued 8,100 people and killed nearly 800 of them between 2002 and 2003. "Drop whatever you are doing and deal with it now," she recalls the director saying.

     So, the disease control lab sent patient samples to the research lab on Dec. 30.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2020, 07:41:26 PM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 05:28:58 PM
Well, it was related to the reports that the bats "bled and peed on the researchers,"

It's already been pointed out that this doesn't pass the sniff test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 03, 2020, 07:45:07 PM
But rest assured, guys: if the "second lab theory" doesn't hold, a "third lab theory" (or something akin) will be put forward without undue delay.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 03, 2020, 08:46:59 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 03, 2020, 07:22:54 PM
     They were sent samples from patients, not bats. They didn't match older bat viruses, ones the lab had studied. The virus had been circulating for more than a month before the lab identified it as new, as far back as early November.

     What I think is most likely is the virus was first transmitted from bats to humans a thousand miles from Wuhan. Bat to human transmission didn't start at the lab or the market. It was brought to the market from some distance away by a human host. No bats need apply.

     The probability that the virus went directly from a bat to a researcher has to be far lower than transmission from a bat to an unprotected civilian.

     If the timeline don't fit, you must acquit:

The mysterious patient samples arrived at the Wuhan Institute of Virology at 7 P.M. on December 30, 2019. Moments later Shi Zhengli's cell phone rang. It was her boss, the institute's director. The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention had detected a novel coronavirus in two hospital patients with atypical pneumonia, and it wanted Shi's renowned laboratory to investigate. If the finding was confirmed, the new pathogen could pose a serious public health threat—because it belonged to the same family of viruses as the one that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a disease that plagued 8,100 people and killed nearly 800 of them between 2002 and 2003. "Drop whatever you are doing and deal with it now," she recalls the director saying.

     So, the disease control lab sent patient samples to the research lab on Dec. 30.
I like that you are making up your own theory on this. Would be kinda funny if we found out patient zero wasn't from the lab or the market.  :D



I heard about this bit of news just now... all the news sites are behind a paywall so can't really link anything, but getting several reporting this (if curious, google):
Quote
U.S. officials warned in January 2018 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology's work on "SARS-like coronaviruses in bats," combined with "a serious shortage" of proper safety procedures, could result in human transmission and the possibility of a "future emerging coronavirus outbreak."

How legit this is, i don't know... well if it is, then that's a bit of a red flag. If it isn't, then just fake news I guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 01:30:24 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on May 03, 2020, 05:57:06 PM
I heard an interview on NPR with a man who had been present during some "bat retrieving" in the caves. He said the lab people wore full protective gear. Alas, the cave was also full of tourists dressed in casual holiday clothes with no protective gear whatever. So, of course it must be the researchers. Conspiracy logic demands it. ::)

Scientific logic (and common) sense demand that when researchers are at work in a place --- any place --- access of any other people be denied or severely restricted. Your man was probably lying about the tourists being there.

And the lie is corroborated by this:

Quote from: Scientific American
Often guided by tips from local villagers, Shi and her colleagues had to hike for hours to potential sites and inch through tight rock crevasses on their stomachs. And the flying mammals can be elusive. In one frustrating week, the team explored more than 30 caves and saw only a dozen bats.

(https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-chinas-bat-woman-hunted-down-viruses-from-sars-to-the-new-coronavirus1/)

So according to your man, casually dressed tourists inched through tight rock crevasses on their stomachs and found themselves in the same place as the researchers. Feel free to believe that. I can't and I don't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 04, 2020, 01:33:08 AM
The economic fall out of the pandemic..... I find the current optimism on the stock markets completely incomprehensible....

I guess the reality is to scary to accept?  ::)


Hong Kong Economy Contracts Most On Record Due to Virus Shutdown (Bloomberg)

Hong Kong's downturn is now the worst on record, extending the first recession seen in a decade as the coronavirus outbreak further battered an economy already weakened by political unrest.

The city's economy contracted 8.9% in the first quarter from year-ago levels, according to advance government data. The decline surpasses the previous record of -8.3% in the third quarter of 1998 and a 7.8% contraction in the first quarter of 2009, the two worst quarterly readings in data back to 1974, according to the Census and Statistics Department Hong Kong.

The latest decline also marks the third straight quarterly contraction for Hong Kong, the longest such stretch since the aftermath of the global financial crisis in 2009.

Economists had forecast a drop in output of 6.5% in the three months to March from the same period a year earlier. Hong Kong's economy shrank 1.2% last year, the first time that had happened since 2009.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 04, 2020, 02:10:28 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 03, 2020, 08:01:25 AM
A couple articles from The Gray Lady, so they may not be true:

Global Backlash Builds Against China Over Coronavirus (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/europe/backlash-china-coronavirus.html?action=click&auth=login-email&login=email&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage)

The Covid-19 Riddle: Why Does the Virus Wallop Some Places and Spare Others? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/europe/backlash-china-coronavirus.html?action=click&auth=login-email&login=email&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage)

They both lead to the same article

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/asia/coronavirus-spread-where-why.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 04, 2020, 04:58:00 AM
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/biggest-failure-in-a-generation-where-did-britain-go-wrong-20200428-p54o2d.html

'Biggest failure in a generation': Where did Britain go wrong?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 04, 2020, 05:29:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 04, 2020, 02:10:28 AM
They both lead to the same article

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/world/asia/coronavirus-spread-where-why.html


Oops, glad you found the right link.  I suspect most people don't click through to stories. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 04, 2020, 05:40:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 04, 2020, 04:58:00 AM
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/biggest-failure-in-a-generation-where-did-britain-go-wrong-20200428-p54o2d.html

'Biggest failure in a generation': Where did Britain go wrong?

Another case of exceptionalism?

"A shambles of mixed messaging, poor organisation and a complacent attitude that what was happening in Italy wouldn't happen here."

Expert advisers that are not convinced of lockdown as a necessary measure doesn't help either.....

Plus, once you are - literally - "behind the curve" and scrambling to handle the situation, many more mistakes and mishaps are bound to pile up.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 04, 2020, 05:53:59 AM
- Internal Chinese report warns Beijing faces Tiananmen-like global backlash over virus, led by the US.
The report, made by security & intelligence sources, even says that China "needs to be prepared in a worst-case scenario for armed confrontation between the two global powers". It was handed over to the Chinese leadership back in early April.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-sentiment-ex/exclusive-internal-chinese-report-warns-beijing-faces-tiananmen-like-global-backlash-over-virus-sources-idUSKBN22G19C?il=0

- French hospitals in the Paris area find local corona virus cases from late December 2019,
possibly due to people frequenting China-related places in town. This was before China alarmed the outside world. The patients recovered.
https://www.bfmtv.com/sante/coronavirus-le-professeur-cohen-affirme-qu-il-y-avait-un-cas-de-covid-19-en-france-des-le-27-decembre-1906757.html#content/contribution/edit

- EU launches vaccine and treatment initiative, expecting to reach at least 7.5 Billion Euros
"No matter who gets the vaccine first: It must be ensured that it is available anywhere in the world and at an affordable price. Because that is the only way that we can beat coronavirus on a global scale, otherwise it will come back in waves".
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-leaders-pledge-billions-for-coronavirus-vaccine-virtual-fundraising-conference/a-53322501
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 04, 2020, 06:18:08 AM
A Covid byproduct: Supreme Court broadcasts oral arguments for the first time ever  (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/supreme-court-broadcasts-oral-arguments-for-the-first-time-ever-2020-05-04)

This should lead to exceptionally well-informed real-time, online discussions of the merits of various arguments.  Of special interest will be the expertise brought to the discussions by non-Americans with their deep knowledge of US con law.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 06:24:33 AM
Quote from: greg on May 03, 2020, 08:46:59 PM
I like that you are making up your own theory on this. Would be kinda funny if we found out patient zero wasn't from the lab or the market.  :D


      It will be hilarious. But whether it's true or not, it's very likely. The bat caves are located some distance from Wuhan in southern China. These bats didn't go on holiday in Wuhan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 06:34:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 01:30:24 AM


(https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-chinas-bat-woman-hunted-down-viruses-from-sars-to-the-new-coronavirus1/)

So according to your man, casually dressed tourists inched through tight rock crevasses on their stomachs and found themselves in the same place as the researchers. Feel free to believe that. I can't and I don't.

[***] I can help:

Her inaugural cave was typical of the region: large, rich in limestone columns and—as a popular tourist destination—easily accessible. "It was spellbinding," Shi recalls. Milky-white stalactites hung from the ceiling like icicles, glistening with moisture.

     That's from the paragraph just above your quote. The bat lady, in search of more bats, went beyond the accessible area to hard to reach places.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 04, 2020, 06:38:54 AM
Quote from: Que on May 04, 2020, 05:40:08 AM
Another case of exceptionalism?

"A shambles of mixed messaging, poor organisation and a complacent attitude that what was happening in Italy wouldn't happen here."

Expert advisers that are not convinced of lockdown as a necessary measure doesn't help either.....

Plus, once you are - literally - "behind the curve" and scrambling to handle the situation, many more mistakes and mishaps are bound to pile up.

Q

I know, it's bad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 06:54:44 AM

     Tests Show Coronavirus Was Spreading in Europe Late Last Year, Weeks Earlier Than Thought (https://www.thedailybeast.com/yves-cohen-says-tests-show-coronavirus-arrived-in-france-last-year?ref=home)

"Of the 24 patients, we had one positive result for COVID-19 on Dec. 27, when he was in hospital with us," he said, adding that the test had been repeated several times to confirm the result.

      Oh OK, the virus was in Europe before it was in the Wuhan lab. Is this time travel?

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 07:13:52 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 06:34:18 AM
     Terminally beliefy people like your good self have difficulty processing information. I can help:

Actually [* * *]. But not before reading this:

But the holidaylike atmosphere soon dissipated. Many bats—including several insect-eating species of horseshoe bats that are abundant in southern Asia—roost in deep, narrow caves on steep terrain. Often guided by tips from local villagers, Shi and her colleagues had to hike for hours to potential sites and inch through tight rock crevasses on their stomachs. And the flying mammals can be elusive. In one frustrating week, the team explored more than 30 caves and saw only a dozen bats.

and understanding that the probability that a full bunch of casual tourists encountered bats in those caves at the same time and in the same place as the researchers (which is what the NPR man claimed) approaches zero.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 04, 2020, 07:14:27 AM
5064 tax agencies in the US are now closed to the public.  That count is up 628 from last week.  No tax agencies have reopened to the public, even in states that have started to reopen other parts of the economy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on May 04, 2020, 07:18:00 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on May 03, 2020, 05:40:08 AM
They have a very different demography, far fewer people >70 yo that make up most of the deaths. And it could be the climate if the virus like similar ones is destroyed quickly by sun/UV rays or also higher temperatures. Then there could be better immunity among people having grown up and living in less sanitzed conditions. Finally, the medical and administrative systems of most of these countries are so underdeveloped that they simply cannot test and evaluate enough, so the data are certainly not very reliable.

You make some valid points. It was reported that in the UK a third of patients suffering from Covid-19 are either black or Asian. OK, it could be due that this demographic is living in deprived areas of the UK but I think something else is going on. The figures seem to point that a black or Asian is in greater danger of falling to the virus at their adopted country in Europe or US. India is a hotbed where social distancing is impossible. I expected a huge outbreak of Coronavirus which with unreliable data or no has not taken place. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on May 04, 2020, 07:23:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 03, 2020, 05:58:08 AM
Good question Irons!  I'm trying to look into it .....so far found this about testing across Africa.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52478344

I'm not so certain that they've gotten off lightly though...

Would need to know and compare rates of testing in the various countries vs. other non-African countries...also percentage of population testing positive...density of population in different areas, etc.  Also, how well they've been keeping track of who has been infected by it and who has died from it.  And how they've been trying to keep it from spreading.

So far, found this re India:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52505436

PD

Thanks, P. I found the India link particularly interesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 04, 2020, 08:15:14 AM
Seattle's Leaders Let Scientists Take the Lead. New York's Did Not (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/04/seattles-leaders-let-scientists-take-the-lead-new-yorks-did-not)


Quote from: Charles DuhiggIn early March, as Dow Constantine was asking Microsoft to close its offices and putting scientists in front of news cameras, de Blasio and New York's governor, Andrew Cuomo, were giving speeches that deëmphasized the risks of the pandemic, even as the city was announcing its first official cases. De Blasio initially voiced caution, saying that "no one should take the coronavirus situation lightly," but soon told residents to keep helping the city's economy. "Go on with your lives + get out on the town despite Coronavirus," he tweeted on March 2nd—one day after the first COVID-19 diagnosis in New York. He urged people to see a movie at Lincoln Center. On the day that Seattle schools closed, de Blasio said at a press conference that "if you are not sick, if you are not in the vulnerable category, you should be going about your life." Cuomo, meanwhile, had told reporters that "we should relax." He said that most infected people would recover with few problems, adding, "We don't even think it's going to be as bad as it was in other countries."


Yep, it's all Trump's fault.


Quote from: Charles DuhiggJeffrey Shaman, a disease modeller at Columbia, said, "All you had to do was look at the West Coast, and you knew it was coming for us. That's why Seattle and San Francisco and Portland were shutting things down." But New York "dithered instead of telling people to stay home."


Portland only shutdown after Governor Kate Brown gave the order.  The press conference the Friday night before her decision was one of the most ridiculous things I've seen.  She dithered, and said her action was an order and a campaign.  Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler looked like he wanted to stab her in the eyeball.  Over the weekend, dozens of mayors signed on to a shutdown, forcing her hand.  Fortunately, the area's two largest private employers - Nike and Intel - had already switched to remote work for almost all non-manufacturing jobs, and many other employers already had as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 08:42:31 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 07:13:52 AM
Actually [* * *]. But not before reading this:

But the holidaylike atmosphere soon dissipated. Many bats—including several insect-eating species of horseshoe bats that are abundant in southern Asia—roost in deep, narrow caves on steep terrain. Often guided by tips from local villagers, Shi and her colleagues had to hike for hours to potential sites and inch through tight rock crevasses on their stomachs. And the flying mammals can be elusive. In one frustrating week, the team explored more than 30 caves and saw only a dozen bats.

and understanding that the probability that a full bunch of casual tourists encountered bats in those caves at the same time and in the same place as the researchers (which is what the NPR man claimed) approaches zero.



     The bats don't wait for researchers to show up to infect people. And they could be local "bat guides", not tourists. Of course an unlucky tourist might have been infected, but I'll put my fiat currency on a local bat guide. Is that too communistic for you?

     I have an idea. Read the whole article. Try to construct a timeline with facts in it. The Wuhan lab got patient samples on Dec. 30. Bats are not patients, people are. No matter how badly the lab had handled previous viruses, if they did, it strikes me as highly implausible that the new virus escaped the lab before it got there. Is there a belief for that? Do ChiCom labs have super powers like gods?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 04, 2020, 08:55:22 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 08:42:31 AM
     The bats don't wait for researchers to show up to infect people. And they could be local "bat guides", not tourists. Of course an unlucky tourist might have been infected, but I'll put my fiat currency on a local bat guide. Is that too communistic for you?

     I have an idea. Read the whole article. Try to construct a timeline with facts in it. The Wuhan lab got patient samples on Dec. 30. Bats are not patients, people are. No matter how badly the lab had handled previous viruses, if they did, it strikes me as highly implausible that the new virus escaped the lab before it got there. Is there a belief for that? Do ChiCom labs have super powers like gods?

You are also assuming that the Chinese officials who say the virus was not present in the lab are telling the truth. They may be, but given the nature of Chinese bureaucracy, that's not a sure thing.

Besides which, the local health officials who sent the mystery samples to be analyzed would have no idea that the virus was originally at the lab, if it was there. They labelled the samples as "mystery virus" because from their vantage point, that's exactly what it was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 09:03:47 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 08:42:31 AM
     The bats don't wait for researchers to show up to infect people. And they could be local "bat guides", not tourists. Of course an unlucky tourist might have been infected, but I'll put my fiat currency on a local bat guide. [...]

     I have an idea. Read the whole article.

I have an even better idea. You read this:

Quote from: BasilValentine on May 03, 2020, 05:57:06 PM
I heard an interview on NPR with a man who had been present during some "bat retrieving" in the caves. He said the lab people wore full protective gear. Alas, the cave was also full of tourists dressed in casual holiday clothes with no protective gear whatever. So, of course it must be the researchers. Conspiracy logic demands it. ::)

Capisci? The cave where researchers fetched the bats was also full of tourists dressed in casual holiday clothes. That is what the man on the NPR claimed, implying that any one of these tourists could have been infected by bats, not only the researchers. He says nothing at all about local bat guides. (So much for me having difficulties processing information and being in the need of your help.)

What I did was simply to point out, based on the Scientific American article, that it would have been highly unlikely for a single tourist dressed in casual holiday clothes, let alone a full bunch of them, to access the remote and rather inaccessible places where bats are usually found at the same time as the researchers did. The man's claim is most probably bogus.

Then came you of all people to accuse me of being... what, "terminally beliefy"? One helluva nerve you've got to make such an accusation, you who believe wholly and unconditionally and without as much as a blinking of an eye everything that the Chinese propaganda spouts urbi et orbi.

You know what? I've really had enough of you. Off to my ignore list you go, the first and probably the only person to sit there.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 09:30:43 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 08:55:22 AM
You are also assuming that the Chinese officials who say the virus was not present in the lab are telling the truth. They may be, but given the nature of Chinese bureaucracy, that's not a sure thing

Besides which, the local health officials who sent the mystery samples to be analyzed would have no idea that the virus was originally at the lab, if it was there. They labelled the samples as "mystery virus" because from their vantage point, that's exactly what it was.

     I don't care about what Chinese officials say, I do care what the chief researcher said, which will not be contradicted because she told the truth. She said the virus was new, and it's newness holds up because a new sickness was spreading immediately before the samples arrived. So you have the new sickness, a virus subsequently determined to be unlike what the lab already had. Until new evidence refutes this narrative, it's bulletproof.

Quote from: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 09:03:47 AM
I have an even better idea. You read this:

     I did read that article more than once. NPR guy says here was there in a cave with casually dressed tourists and researchers in full protective gear. The context makes it clear he wasn't in an inaccessible area. There isn't much there to prompt the accusation of lying, or a motivation for doing so.

QuoteOne helluva nerve you've got to make such an accusation, you who believe wholly and unconditionally and without as much as a blinking of an eye everything that the Chinese propaganda spouts urbi et orbi.

     That's me in a nutshell, a communist propagandist all the way down. All power to the Soviets! Hail Satan, personal friend of mine!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 10:18:59 AM

     I don't think the best response to Chinese Communist propaganda is Trumpist propaganda. Our side should consider a regard for truth as an advantage over beliefy shit.

     It's not too late to start being trustworthy. If China won't allow an impartial investigation into the origins of the outbreak, does that mean we shouldn't do it either? The Trumpeo approach gives people no reason to prefer the US to the Commies. Withdrawing from the WHO because of Chinese influence magnifies Chinese influence. How braindead is that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 10:24:42 AM
Just to be clear: I don't subscribe to the notion that the virus is man-made and was released intentionally. All I'm saying is that the notion that it mutated inside the Wuhan lab and was released accidentally cannot be dismissed out of hand on the sole ground of what Chinese officials, including lab officials, say. To do so would be the top of gullibility. Actually, given tne nature, aims and methods of the CCP, a reverse presumption of innocence is the most healthy and rational position: every statement, information or statistics that comes from Chinese officials and Chinese official media should be considered at best incomplete/doubtful and at worst inaccurate/false unless proven right by an independent third party.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 04, 2020, 11:09:49 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 09:30:43 AM
     I don't care about what Chinese officials say, I do care what the chief researcher said, which will not be contradicted because she told the truth. She said the virus was new, and it's newness holds up because a new sickness was spreading immediately before the samples arrived. So you have the new sickness, a virus subsequently determined to be unlike what the lab already had. Until new evidence refutes this narrative, it's bulletproof.
!

The researcher is a Chinese official...or at least heavily dependent on Chinese officials whom she needs to keep herself in the position of chief researcher. Therefore anything she says ought to be treated with the skepticism with which anything said by Chinese officials  in any context  should be treated.

So it's hardly bulletproof.

Noting the fact that Chinese bureaucrats  don't have a strict allegiance to telling the truth is not Trumpian propaganda.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 11:17:28 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 11:09:49 AM
The researcher is a Chinese official...or at least heavily dependent on Chinese officials whom she needs to keep herself in the position of chief researcher. Therefore anything she says ought to be treated with the skepticism with which anything said by Chinese officials  in any context  should be treated.

So it's hardly bulletproof.

Noting the fact that Chinese bureaucrats  don't have a strict allegiance to telling the truth is not Trumpian propaganda.

Agreed on all accounts, not that I have any merit in so doing. It's just plain common sense and I'm greatly puzzled that people who purport to be rational, objective and hard-facts-based can be so gullible when it comes to Chinese propaganda.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 04, 2020, 11:25:48 AM
Nobody here is following Chinese propaganda. They're following reporting that treats the Chinese government with skepticism but still finds that the origin of the virus was unlikely to have been the lab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 12:15:44 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 11:09:49 AM
The researcher is a Chinese official...or at least heavily dependent on Chinese officials whom she needs to keep herself in the position of chief researcher.

     I don't buy this. Scientists communicate with each other across national and ideological boundaries far more than Communists or Trumpists would want. The chatter intelligence officials would rely on as evidence of a coverup never occurred, which itself is evidence.

QuoteAll I'm saying is that the notion that it mutated inside the Wuhan lab and was released accidentally cannot be dismissed out of hand on the sole ground of what Chinese officials, including lab officials, say.

     This story is false without being dismissed out of hand. It's false because no evidence supports the claim that the lab had the virus before they are known to have acquired it, because the reputation of the chief researcher remains unsullied, because the virus has a history of spread that makes the weakass lab theory utterly superfluous except as propaganda, and because even Communist hacks can't control scientists and keep them from leaking the truth about something so dangerous and central to their mission.

     
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 04, 2020, 11:25:48 AM
Nobody here is following Chinese propaganda. They're following reporting that treats the Chinese government with skepticism but still finds that the origin of the virus was unlikely to have been the lab.

     The idea that only Chinese propaganda makes the lab release story improbable and superfluous to the origin of the pandemic is plain silly. Natural spread from animal to human hosts is how the samples got to the lab. We don't need a bonus explanation on top of that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 12:21:11 PM


     In Massachusetts we have 86 deaths today and 1000 new cases. That looks like a significant slowdown for both.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 04, 2020, 12:23:48 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 12:15:44 PMThe idea that only Chinese propaganda makes the lab release story improbable and superfluous to the origin of the pandemic is plain silly. Natural spread from animal to human hosts is how the samples got to the lab. We don't need a bonus explanation on top of that.

To believe the claim that the virus epidemic was caused by accidental release by the lab that was studying it is like believing that people in Detroit were not poisoned by their drinking water, they were poisoned by accidental release of drinking water samples collected by the lab that was measuring lead levels.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 02:03:10 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 04, 2020, 12:23:48 PM
To believe the claim that the virus epidemic was caused by accidental release by the lab that was studying it is like believing that people in Detroit were not poisoned by their drinking water, they were poisoned by accidental release of drinking water samples collected by the lab that was measuring lead levels.


     Wait, are you saying........
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 04, 2020, 03:22:00 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 12:15:44 PM
     I don't buy this. Scientists communicate with each other across national and ideological boundaries far more than Communists or Trumpists would want. The chatter intelligence officials would rely on as evidence of a coverup never occurred, which itself is evidence.

It just occurred to me, I read a scandal piece to the effect that Fauci was funding bat virus research at the Wuhan lab (shock, horror!). Well, that would be a bit out of the ordinary because the NIH almost exclusively funds research in U.S. facilities. But a small fraction of funding does go overseas, and having access to bats that are presumed to have caused the SARS pandemic would give NIH a good reason to fund a Wuhan lab, especially if they had U.S. collaborators.

But the point is, accepting an NIH grand involves a lot of oversight, such as quarterly reports in which you have to brag about what fantastic results have been obtained since the last report, lest the grant be canceled, and requirements that detailed information is about novel reagents or sequences be stored in institutional databases. They would have trouble keeping secrets. Anyway, any NIH grants are in a publicly accessible database. Anyone with an internet connection can look them up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 04, 2020, 03:27:39 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 04, 2020, 12:23:48 PM
To believe the claim that the virus epidemic was caused by accidental release by the lab that was studying it is like believing that people in Detroit were not poisoned by their drinking water, they were poisoned by accidental release of drinking water samples collected by the lab that was measuring lead levels.

So lead in water is contagious?

If the virus was accidently released in the lab, the Chinese have an extra motivation to hide that fact. In the end, whatever evidence there is is under the control of the Chinese authorities, which means skepticism is called for.  One can maintain that lab officials and researchers never ever lie to protect their own institution, of course, just like one can maintain that captains in the British Navy never ever get sick at sea.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 04, 2020, 03:30:10 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 04, 2020, 03:22:00 PM
It just occurred to me, I read a scandal piece to the effect that Fauci was funding bat virus research at the Wuhan lab (shock, horror!). Well, that would be a bit out of the ordinary because the NIH almost exclusively funds research in U.S. facilities. But a small fraction of funding does go overseas, and having access to bats that are presumed to have caused the SARS pandemic would give NIH a good reason to fund a Wuhan lab, especially if they had U.S. collaborators.

But the point is, accepting an NIH grand involves a lot of oversight, such as quarterly reports in which you have to brag about what fantastic results have been obtained since the last report, lest the grant be canceled, and requirements that detailed information is about novel reagents or sequences be stored in institutional databases. They would have trouble keeping secrets. Anyway, any NIH grants are in a publicly accessible database. Anyone with an internet connection can look them up.

If I remember correctly, that "funding" was the team of observers pulled out of Wuhan by the Trump administration because we obviously didn't need to worry about Chinese viruses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 04, 2020, 04:37:00 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 03:30:10 PM
If I remember correctly, that "funding" was the team of observers pulled out of Wuhan by the Trump administration because we obviously didn't need to worry about Chinese viruses.

Oh, yeah, the guy who says he shares his uncle's science genius . . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 04, 2020, 06:29:27 PM

     
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 03:27:39 PM


If the virus was accidently released in the lab, the Chinese have an extra motivation to hide that fact.

     Oh sure, they'd try to cover up an actual release. There's no reason to believe it happened, but if it did they'd deny it, and we'd know they were lying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on May 04, 2020, 08:01:51 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 04, 2020, 11:09:49 AM
The researcher is a Chinese official...or at least heavily dependent on Chinese officials whom she needs to keep herself in the position of chief researcher. Therefore anything she says ought to be treated with the skepticism with which anything said by Chinese officials  in any context  should be treated.

So it's hardly bulletproof.

Noting the fact that Chinese bureaucrats  don't have a strict allegiance to telling the truth is not Trumpian propaganda.

Why are you nattering about the trustworthiness of bureaucrats? Read the frickin' science:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 04, 2020, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 04, 2020, 03:22:00 PM
It just occurred to me, I read a scandal piece to the effect that Fauci was funding bat virus research at the Wuhan lab (shock, horror!). Well, that would be a bit out of the ordinary because the NIH almost exclusively funds research in U.S. facilities. But a small fraction of funding does go overseas, and having access to bats that are presumed to have caused the SARS pandemic would give NIH a good reason to fund a Wuhan lab, especially if they had U.S. collaborators.

But the point is, accepting an NIH grand involves a lot of oversight, such as quarterly reports in which you have to brag about what fantastic results have been obtained since the last report, lest the grant be canceled, and requirements that detailed information is about novel reagents or sequences be stored in institutional databases. They would have trouble keeping secrets. Anyway, any NIH grants are in a publicly accessible database. Anyone with an internet connection can look them up.

I did just that. It turns out that the grant has absolutely nothing to do with the Wuhan lab and absolutely nothing to do with bats. It is a grant to Wuhan University and is about Kaposi Sarcoma:

KSHV is the etiological agent of Kaposi' Sarcoma (KS), which is one of the major malignancies in AIDS patients and common neoplasm in KSHV endemic region including Xinjiang China. In the proposed studies we will focus on the versatile function of LANA in KSHV-related tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. The results would provide unique and novel clues for targeted therapeutic development for treatment of KS disease.

Read the full description of the grant here: https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9668020&icde=49846307&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=1&csb=default&cs=ASC&pball= (https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9668020&icde=49846307&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=1&csb=default&cs=ASC&pball=)

That scandal piece is just that, a scandal piece containing gross misinformation.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 04, 2020, 11:21:53 PM
Pages and pages about various Lab Theories...

You guys have been sent down a rabbit hole by Trump who wants to distract the public from his miserable performance and point the finger at China  -  including weird notions of "punishing" China.

Like Benghazi / HRC it's sufficiently vague to continue for ages, and there will never be a conclusion, even though numerous scientists have said and written there is zero evidence for these theories, and there is evidence to the contrary.

It's a political game.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 05, 2020, 12:46:54 AM
Back in late April, a columnist in the Swedish paper Aftonbladet, Wolfgang Hansson, had an overview bid, about long-term developments. He admits though, that he might be wrong in some respects.

1) there'll be bigger acceptance of fatalities for quite a long time, the strive for a better economy becoming more important. It will be very difficult to re-introduce big lock-downs again. But the health sectors will tend to receive increased support. Mass testing will increase
2) schools will become some of the first places to re-open, teachers will be regularly tested if possible
3) international mass tourism, as we knew it before the crisis, will tend to re-open only quite late and gradually
4) there'll be a general, deep recession
5) China will probably increase its power, and the US will be weakened, since it is poorly equipped to handle the crisis, due to its system and the current president. Unless there's an international reaction against China as being responsible for the outbreak
6) an increased inequaliy, famine and poverty in the world generally
7) decrease in the globalization trends, increase in nationally orientated measures and productions
8 ) a collapse in the oil price, probably lasting at least a year, will affect some economies severely, like Russia, Venezuela, Iran etc., & it might cause regime changes
9) The EU appears generally very weakened, but the economical union will continue, due to its advantages
10) The general freedom of movement will decrease too
11) the principles of social distancing will continue, at least for quite a foreseeable future

Cf. https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/kolumnister/a/K3mOzy/sa-ser-varlden-ut-efter-corona


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 05, 2020, 05:08:03 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 04, 2020, 11:21:53 PM
numerous scientists have said and written there is zero evidence for these theories, and there is evidence to the contrary.

Based on the available evidence, scientists have said that it is, quote, improbable that the virus be man-made, unquote. I'm okay with that.

But for the idea that the virus, although not man-made, was studied in the Wuhan lab and accidentally escaped there is no available evidence, neither for, nor to the contrary, other than what the director of the lab said. I'm not okay with that.

Quote
It's a political game.

How ironic, given that the first to play politics with the situation were the Chinese officials themselves who downplayed the whole thing and silenced the doctors who warned them about the new threat, just because a CCP congress was scheduled in Wuhan and nothing, not even an extremely dangerous epidemics, should stand in the Party's way.

It's obvious that China badly mismanaged the outbreak of the epidemics, for ideological reasons. Had they put the health of their own citizens ahead of any ideological prejudice and CCP interest, they'd have acted quicker and more determined and would have greatly contained the epidemics before it spread worldwide. They did not* and the whole mess exploded internationally, whereupon they began a massive campaign of propaganda and misinformation in order to cover up their responsibility.

*with the complicity of the WHO, which at least in the first phases of the pandemics (which it actually did not even declared as such until it was too late) parroted the Chinese lies.

Yes, it's politics, but you're pointing in one direction only, while ignoring how and why the whole mess started.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 05, 2020, 05:18:01 AM
Haven't seen this posted here before:

"Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab... Based on the scientific evidence, he also doesn't entertain an alternate theory—that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped".

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/05/anthony-fauci-no-scientific-evidence-the-coronavirus-was-made-in-a-chinese-lab-cvd/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 06:39:44 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on May 04, 2020, 08:01:51 PM
Why are you nattering about the trustworthiness of bureaucrats? Read the frickin' science:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf

I did, thank you.

In this particular point, it rules against the lab theory based on speculation about evidence it admits we don't actually  have.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 07:08:36 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 04, 2020, 11:21:53 PM
Pages and pages about various Lab Theories...

You guys have been sent down a rabbit hole by Trump who wants to distract the public from his miserable performance and point the finger at China  -  including weird notions of "punishing" China.



     One sign of beliefy vulnerability to propaganda is embracing the propaganda of the opposing side. We can do batter by rejecting the notion that truth has a side, that it's not automatic that Trumpists lie even though they often do. By neutral truth criteria the lab release narrative stinks of the motivations of its proponents.

     There are better reasons to hate the ChiComs than believing bogus shit about them. The truth is good enough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: j winter on May 05, 2020, 07:13:22 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 04, 2020, 11:21:53 PM
Pages and pages about various Lab Theories...

You guys have been sent down a rabbit hole by Trump who wants to distract the public from his miserable performance and point the finger at China  -  including weird notions of "punishing" China.

Like Benghazi / HRC it's sufficiently vague to continue for ages, and there will never be a conclusion, even though numerous scientists have said and written there is zero evidence for these theories, and there is evidence to the contrary.

It's a political game.

+1 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 05, 2020, 07:28:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 05, 2020, 05:08:03 AM
Based on the available evidence, scientists have said that it is, quote, improbable that the virus be man-made, unquote. I'm okay with that.

But for the idea that the virus, although not man-made, was studied in the Wuhan lab and accidentally escaped there is no available evidence, neither for, nor to the contrary, other than what the director of the lab said. I'm not okay with that.

How ironic, given that the first to play politics with the situation were the Chinese officials themselves who downplayed the whole thing and silenced the doctors who warned them about the new threat, just because a CCP congress was scheduled in Wuhan and nothing, not even an extremely dangerous epidemics, should stand in the Party's way.

It's obvious that China badly mismanaged the outbreak of the epidemics, for ideological reasons. Had they put the health of their own citizens ahead of any ideological prejudice and CCP interest, they'd have acted quicker and more determined and would have greatly contained the epidemics before it spread worldwide. They did not* and the whole mess exploded internationally, whereupon they began a massive campaign of propaganda and misinformation in order to cover up their responsibility.

*with the complicity of the WHO, which at least in the first phases of the pandemics (which it actually did not even declared as such until it was too late) parroted the Chinese lies.

Yes, it's politics, but you're pointing in one direction only, while ignoring how and why the whole mess started.
Thank you also for clarifying so I don't have to.

There are too many pages so Herman probably didn't read. Even I have skipped reading many pages on this thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 07:28:44 AM
One sign of beliefy vulnerability to propaganda is embracing the propaganda of the opposing side. We can do batter by rejecting the notion that truth has a side, that it's not automatic that Chinese officials lie even though they often do. By neutral truth criteria the it did not come from the lab  narrative stinks of the motivations of its proponents.

     There are better reasons to hate Trump than believing bogus shit about them. The truth is good enough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 08:12:41 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 05, 2020, 07:28:44 AM
One sign of beliefy vulnerability to propaganda is embracing the propaganda of the opposing side. We can do batter by rejecting the notion that truth has a side, that it's not automatic that Chinese officials lie even though they often do. By neutral truth criteria the it did not come from the lab  narrative stinks of the motivations of its proponents.

     There are better reasons to hate Trump than believing bogus shit about them. The truth is good enough.

     

     You still need evidence for a lab release,  and "ChiCommies are liars" isn't that. Of course they lie. But nothing is true because a liar says it's false. The Chinese may deny they are descendants of Martian Bat-Rat-Spiders, but that doesn't prove they are.

     (https://kaiju.wdfiles.com/local--files/wiki:bat_rat_spider/bat_rat_spider_1959_01.jpg)

      OK, it does look a little Chinese.

     

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 05, 2020, 08:41:45 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 05, 2020, 05:18:01 AM
"Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab... Based on the scientific evidence, he also doesn't entertain an alternate theory—that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped".

Good evening, Rafael.

This is not an alternate theory, this is a fairy tale. Of course one is completely unable to "find a virus in the wild", let alone "bring it to a lab." Formulated thus it's a strawman. I think that not even the most lunatic conspiracy theorist ever claimed that.

The "alternate theory" is about the bats which were being studied in that lab prior to the outbreak of the pandemics. If there is scientific evidence that (1) none of them was already infected with the naturally-mutated virus, or (2) even if infected none of them could have infected one or more researchers, or (3) even if one or more researchers could have been infected none of them could have infected anybody outside the lab, then the case is closed. The problem is that there is not. All we have is a statement of the lab's director saying that they did not have the virus. Well, Mr. Fauci probably trusts her, and so do some people here on GMG, but personally I don't see how a simple statement (especially one made by an interested party and especially one made by someone operating under extreme ideological pressure and control from a Communist government) can be regarded as scientific evidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 05, 2020, 08:58:34 AM
Good evening to you, Andrei.

The thing is, there seems to be no scientific evidence for the points you make. But, there's no scientific evidence against them either.

I have no sympathy for the Chinese government and the Communist Party (none whatsoever), but am not going to blame them for this just because I don't like them. Remember, the end does not justify the means...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 05, 2020, 09:11:06 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 05, 2020, 08:58:34 AM
The thing is, there seems to be no scientific evidence for the points you make. But, there's no scientific evidence against them either.

Precisely, which means that until and unless said evidence is found, both positions can be equally true or equally false (only not simultaneously so). What I can't understand is the stern refusal of some people to even consider the possibility that the "accidental lab leakage" theory be true, based only and solely on the word of the lab's director.

Quote
I have no sympathy for the Chinese government and the Communist Party (none whatsoever), but am not going to blame them for this just because I don't like them.

Nobody in their minds can blame them for an accidental release, if this is what really happened. What many people, and apparently some governments too which can hardly be regarded as Trumpist (Australia, France, Germany) blame them for --- and rightly so, imo --- is (1) the mismanagement of the incipient phase of the disaster, which mismanagement was entirely politically motivated and resulted in the worldwide crisis being much worse than it could have been if they had handled it quicker and more transparent, and (2) the subsequent campaign of propaganda and misinformation aimed at covering up their responsibility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 05, 2020, 09:26:05 AM
The thing is, I insist, I'm not going to speculate on theories just because they suit my agenda.

Be that as it may, the recent data from France (an infected person as early as December 2019) might potentially shed new light on the whole thing.

And...we haven't even talked of the 5G - Covid-19 relation.... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 05, 2020, 09:34:39 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 05, 2020, 09:26:05 AM
The thing is, I insist, I'm not going to speculate on theories just because they suit my agenda.

I don't know about your agenda but I have none.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 05, 2020, 09:39:40 AM
Yes, I know, just a innocent bystander  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 05, 2020, 09:46:07 AM
There are increasing speculations about earlier cases in Europe etc., and WHO now suggests that countries dig more into it.

But so far, only the single, French case exists, and some say that it is not conclusive anyway.

However, in Lombardy, Northern Italy, which was severely hit, it may have occurred in October-November, since there was a significant increase in the number of registered pneumonia cases there.

The leading Swedish spokesperson, Tegnell, now also says they might have had it Sweden back in October-November, when a lot of sportsmen came back from the Military Olympics in Wuhan, which had participants from more than 100 countries. But they are not thought to have infected anyone in Sweden, and there's no real proof, except stories about team members getting sick etc. Sweden is not going to use its resources on investigating this right now, Tegnell said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 09:50:12 AM

     You can't build an affirmative case for a lab release hypothesis based on what China would lie about if the case was true. You can suppose, as I do, that they'd be prone to lie about it if they thought they would get away with it. I also suppose they wouldn't get away with it. Scientists are hard to muzzle. Ask Trump.

     China leaks like a sieve, we all know that when we are in the knowing mode. Scientists leak as a matter of principle. Intelligence agencies below the level of Trumpist acting acting acting apparatchiki super know it.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 05, 2020, 09:54:36 AM
Scientists say a now-dominant strain of the coronavirus appears to be more contagious than original (https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-05/mutant-coronavirus-has-emerged-more-contagious-than-original)

Fuck.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 10:20:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 05, 2020, 09:46:07 AM
There are increasing speculations about earlier cases in Europe etc., and WHO now suggests that countries dig more into it.

But so far, only the single, French case exists, and some say that it is not conclusive anyway.

However, in Lombardia, Northern Italy, which was severely hit, it may have occurred in October-November, since there was a significant increase in the number of registered pneumonia cases there.

The leading Swedish spokesperson, Tegnell, now also says they might have had it Sweden back in October-November, when a lot of sportsmen came back from the Military Olympics in Wuhan, which had participants from more than 100 countries. But they are not thought to have infected anyone in Sweden, and there's no real proof, except stories about team members getting sick etc. Sweden is not going to use its ressources on investigating this right now, Tegnell said.

     I wonder how far back we can push the lab release hypothesis to accommodate new information about earlier cases. Can we go all the way back to the Boxer Rebellion?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 05, 2020, 11:45:07 AM
Another case is the Inter football team from Milan, where the player Romelu Lukaku claimed that 23 out of 25 of the team's layers showed symptoms of the virus, before its verified arrival, when they played Cagliari in January. One player had to leave the field, but they were never tested. Lukaku went straight to bed after the game.

Before the claims, he had donated a large amount, £ 88,000, to a local hospital help the fight against the virus, which would suggest some seriousness in his general approach. But he 'apologized' to Inter the day after, for his remarks, that came in a twitter conversation with a journalist, Kat Kerkhof. The case was then considered 'settled'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 11:45:42 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 09:50:12 AM
     . I also suppose they wouldn't get away with it.



I don't think you should be so confident about that.

Given that whatever evidence there is, is under the control of authorities who have a motivation to suppress anything that supports the lab release, the most reasonable attitude is to not dismiss the lab release theory as blithely as you do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 11:47:11 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 10:20:25 AM
     I wonder how far back we can push the lab release hypothesis to accommodate new information about earlier cases. Can we go all the way back to the Boxer Rebellion?

But if it appeared that early outside China, wouldn't that tend to scupper the "wet market"  theory as well?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 12:12:50 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 05, 2020, 11:47:11 AM
But if it appeared that early outside China, wouldn't that tend to scupper the "wet market"  theory as well?

     Yes, and that's a good thing. Bats don't visit wet markets a thousand miles away from their home. People do that. The virus cluster at the market didn't involve bats. The virus crossed the species barrier near the bat caves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 12:29:19 PM
Quote from: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 12:12:50 PM
     Yes, and that's a good thing. Bats don't visit wet markets a thousand miles away from their home. People do that. The virus cluster at the market didn't involve bats. The virus crossed the species barrier near the bat caves.

I don't think I've seen that before. 
But it's certainly possible. But how do you account for the fact that it seems to have first appeared in Wuhan if the first human cases were that far away?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 05, 2020, 12:44:14 PM
Just saw this
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-israel-treatment-idUSKBN22G2WT
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 05, 2020, 02:59:50 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 05, 2020, 12:29:19 PM
I don't think I've seen that before. 
But it's certainly possible. But how do you account for the fact that it seems to have first appeared in Wuhan if the first human cases were that far away?

      An NPR article says:

In early January 2020, Chinese scientists sequenced the entire genome for SARS-CoV-2 and published it online. Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China compared its genome to a library of known viruses — and found a 96% match with coronavirus samples taken from horseshoe bats from Yunnan.

     I'm waiting to see if they can trace the new virus to bats near Wuhan. If they can my speculation will be superfluous and I will disown it.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 05, 2020, 06:37:41 PM
You're barking up the wrong tree.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 12:42:16 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 05, 2020, 09:26:05 AM
I'm not going to speculate on theories just because they suit my agenda.

There are speculations and speculations. If the lab were located 700 miles away from Wuhan any speculation would be wild. Given its location, though, the "accidental lab escape" speculation is reasonable unless and until solid evidence proves it wrong.

Quote from: JBS on May 05, 2020, 11:45:42 AM
Given that whatever evidence there is, is under the control of authorities who have a motivation to suppress anything that supports the lab release, the most reasonable attitude is to not dismiss the lab release theory [...]

+ 1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 06, 2020, 12:52:32 AM
O ciel, che noia!  ;)

Good day, Andrei!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on May 06, 2020, 04:05:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 12:42:16 AM
There are speculations and speculations. If the lab were located 700 miles away from Wuhan any speculation would be wild. Given its location, though, the "accidental lab escape" speculation is reasonable unless and until solid evidence proves it wrong.

+ 1.
It's not reasonable at all. It may be right or wrong and you may think as you like but it's not reasonable if you're defining reason in the usual fashion. I mean, if it's a fallacy then it's unreasonable by definition. So, this is called "shifting the burden of proof" and it also fits into the formal "argument from ignorance fallacy."
see here:
https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm
(https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm)and here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance)
You can certainly say, "I believe this" and even, like my sister, say something like, "it's too coincidental." However, IMHO, you can't claim it's rational for the reasons I stated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 04:14:12 AM
Quote from: milk on May 06, 2020, 04:05:14 AM
It's not reasonable at all. It may be right or wrong and you may think as you like but it's not reasonable if you're defining reason in the usual fashion. I mean, if it's a fallacy then it's unreasonable by definition. So, this is called "shifting the burden of proof" and it also fits into the formal "argument from ignorance fallacy."
see here:
https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm
(https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm)and here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance)
You can certainly say, "I believe this" and even, like my sister, say something like, "it's too coincidental." However, IMHO, you can't claim it's rational for the reasons I stated.

In so many words and links you say what boils down to "It's unreasonable to consider as possibly true a theory when there is no evidence whatever either for or against it." An unreasonable statement with which I strongly disagree.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 06, 2020, 04:42:40 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 05, 2020, 09:54:36 AM
Scientists say a now-dominant strain of the coronavirus appears to be more contagious than original (https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-05/mutant-coronavirus-has-emerged-more-contagious-than-original)

Fuck.


https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2020/05/what-to-know-about-that-new-paper-claiming-the-coronavirus-is-becoming-more-contagious/

What To Know About That New Paper Claiming The Coronavirus Is Becoming More Contagious

Quote"They didn't do a single experiment, and this is all conjecture," she told Gizmodo. "There's no indication that this mutation makes the virus more transmissible, and they've done nothing to show that this mutation is functionally significant."

Research into covid-19 has progressed faster than science typically does. Researchers (and journalists) have had to balance the need for accuracy with the public health risks. In releasing their paper, the authors said they felt an urgent need for an "early warning" pipeline to track changes in the evolution of the virus's spike protein. That's because the spike protein is what scientists are aiming to target with potential vaccines and treatments. Any truly relevant mutations there could seriously impact those efforts and may even make survivors vulnerable to a second infection.

But viruses mutate all the time, and most mutations end up not affecting how the virus spreads or sickens people. For now, the jury is still out on whether these preliminary findings by the Los Alamos team mean anything. That said, the current pandemic is plenty scary enough, mutated virus or not.

"It bears watching, but it also bears scepticism," Hanage said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 06, 2020, 04:44:16 AM
Re the above, this makes a sort of natural common sense to me, I should say I know nothing about the science and I must admit, I didn't grasp it until it was spelt out

QuoteBut viruses mutate all the time, and most mutations end up not affecting how the virus spreads or sickens people.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 06, 2020, 04:53:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 06, 2020, 04:42:40 AM

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2020/05/what-to-know-about-that-new-paper-claiming-the-coronavirus-is-becoming-more-contagious/

What To Know About That New Paper Claiming The Coronavirus Is Becoming More Contagious


Hopefully the LA Times report ends up a nothingburger.  That would be great.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 06, 2020, 04:55:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 06, 2020, 04:44:16 AM
Re the above, this makes a sort of natural common sense to me, I should say I know nothing about the science and I must admit, I didn't grasp it until it was spelt out

Two comments.

A protein is a linear chain, a polymer, of monomers with the same backbone but varying properties of the side groups. To be active proteins needs to fold into a specific shape. Often a protein has a critical active site, and the rest is scaffolding that holds it in the right shape. A mutation to the active site will usually be critical, a mutation to a less critical part of the protein can have a minor effect or no effect.

The idea that this situation is so urgent that we have to take shortcuts on the scientific method to speed up the process is profoundly stupid. Science is the shortcut. Circumventing the review process, going on anecdotal reports, unverified hunches, etc, is the slow method. Using scientific equipment doesn't make it science. The scientific review process is critical. We can speed it up by putting more scientists to work on it so more things are explored in parallel, but to try to speed up the timeline will only inhibit progress.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 06, 2020, 05:30:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 04:14:12 AM
In so many words and links you say what boils down to "It's unreasonable to consider as possibly true a theory when there is no evidence whatever either for or against it." An unreasonable statement with which I strongly disagree.
Non, mon cher. I won't speak for milk, of course, but what I see here is that what is usually unacceptable, namely the reversal of the burden of proof, suddenly becomes fine and dandy when the alleged culprit is someone we had an animosity to before the alleged events took place.

Un fuerte abrazo,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 05:38:06 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 06, 2020, 05:30:38 AM
Non, mon cher. I won't speak for milk, of course, but what I see here is that what is usually unacceptable, namely the reversal of the burden of proof, suddenly becomes fine and dandy when the alleged culprit is someone we had an animosity to before the alleged events took place.

Oh ciel, che noia!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 06, 2020, 05:41:36 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 05:38:06 AM
Oh ciel, che noia!
;D ;D ;D

Otro abrazo fuerte,

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 06:03:27 AM
Quote from: ritter on May 06, 2020, 05:30:38 AM
Non, mon cher. I won't speak for milk, of course, but what I see here is that what is usually unacceptable, namely the reversal of the burden of proof, suddenly becomes fine and dandy when the alleged culprit is someone we had an animosity to before the alleged events took place.

One final word on this.

Quote from: Wikipedia
In an interview with Gareth Jones in March 1933, Soviet Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov stated, "Well, there is no famine [in Ukraine]"

According to you, if I said back then "I don't trust Litvinov. It's possible that there actually is famine in Ukraine" then  I would have done what is usually unacceptable, namely the reversal of the burden of proof, suddenly becomes fine and dandy when the alleged culprit is someone we had an animosity to before the alleged events took place. Please don't deny it, it's the exact equivalent of my saying today "I don't trust the Chinese. It's possible that they actually had the virus in the lab."

Un fortissimo abrazo.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 06:41:33 AM
     
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 06:03:27 AM
One final word on this.

According to you, if I said back then "I don't trust Litvinov. It's possible that there actually is famine in Ukraine" then  I would have done what is usually unacceptable, namely the reversal of the burden of proof, suddenly becomes fine and dandy when the alleged culprit is someone we had an animosity to before the alleged events took place. Please don't deny it, it's the exact equivalent of my saying today "I don't trust the Chinese. It's possible that they actually had the virus in the lab."

Un fortissimo abrazo.

     Evidence is a legit way to assign burden of proof. Not trusting Litvinov can't be a reason to believe a famine took place.

     There is evidence that jumping off a cliff will kill you. If Litvinov told you not to jump off a cliff would you jump? Would you ignore evidence in order to disbelieve Litvinov?

     Don't leave out the evidence factor. It protects you from lying officials and theologians. Beliefy disbelief gives you no way to discriminate between true and false statements.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:01:20 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 06:41:33 AM
Not trusting Litvinov can't be a reason to believe a famine took place.

And yet had I believed in 1933, that a famine took place in Ukraine I would have been absolutely right, and had you not believed in 1933 that a famine took place in Ukraine you would have been absolutely wrong. Take that!

QuoteThere is evidence that jumping off a cliff will kill you. If Litvinov told you not to jump off a cliff would you jump? Would you ignore evidence in order to disbelieve Litvinov?

The key word here is evidence. There is amply documented, independent third-party evidence that jumping off a cliff is mortal.

The moment there will be amply documented, independent third-party evidence that the Wuhan lab did indeed not have the virus, I will believe the lab's director claim that they did not have it. Until then, I'll have my doubts.

Once again: when I say virus I mean a naturally mutated one, not a man-made one, precisely because there is amply documented, independent third-party evidence that the virus is improbable to be man-made.

QuoteDon't leave out the evidence factor.

On the contrary, I bring it in: show me evidence that the lab did not have the virus, other than what the lab's director claims, and I'll cast aside my skepticism.

(Drat, did I just reply to a poster I ignore?  ;D)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 06, 2020, 07:19:41 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 06:41:33 AM
     
     Evidence is a legit way to assign burden of proof. Not trusting Litvinov can't be a reason to believe a famine took place.

     There is evidence that jumping off a cliff will kill you. If Litvinov told you not to jump off a cliff would you jump? Would you ignore evidence in order to disbelieve Litvinov?

     Don't leave out the evidence factor. It protects you from lying officials and theologians. Beliefy disbelief gives you no way to discriminate between true and false statements.

I would put it this way. If you don't trust Litvinov his denial (or confirmation) means nothing. Why were they asking him if there was famine in Ukraine? Whether you believe it or not depends on whether there is other evidence to support the existence of the famine.

In the case of the novel coronavirus, you may say the credibility of the Chinese authorities is low or nonexistent. What evidence is there to support the lab theory? None, except that there happened to be a lab in the city where the outbreak was first detected. (Presumably they put it there because they wanted to prevent future outbreaks.) Aside from that coincidence there is no evidence to suggest it came from the lab.

When Sergei Skripal and his daughter were poisoned in the UK, the Russians made a big deal of the fact that there was a government biology lab nearby. Do we therefore believe that it was the British government rather than Russian thugs that poisoned him? (Some do, I suppose). Experience shows that when something goes wrong there is invariably a government facility nearby that conspiracy theorists can fixate on.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 07:22:16 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:01:20 AM
And yet had I believed in 1933, that a famine took place in Ukraine I would have been absolutely right, and had you not believed in 1933 that a famine took place in Ukraine you would have been absolutely wrong. Take that!

The key word here is evidence. There is amply documented, independent third-party evidence that jumping off a cliff is mortal.

The moment there will be amply documented, independent third-party evidence that the Wuhan lab did indeed not have the virus, I will believe the lab's director claim that they did not have it. Until then, I'll have my doubts.

Once again: when I say virus I mean a naturally mutated one, not a man-made one, precisely because there is amply documented, independent third-party evidence that the virus is improbable to be man-made.

On the contrary, I bring it in: show me evidence that the lab did not have the virus, other than what the lab's director claims, and I'll cast aside my skepticism.

(Drat, did I just reply to a poster I ignore?  ;D)


    You are confused. You cite evidence as the reason to disbelieve Litvinov, which means your disbelief is not the criteria, the weight of evidence is. But then you say that a priori disbelief would lead to the correct conclusion, that what's true is what Litvinov says is false, no stinking evidence needed either way. So you ignore what the lack of evidence for the Wuhan lab release means and decide a priori disbelief can make something true all by its lonesome. I've run into this kind of thing before.
     
     I say be guided by evidence and the lack of it without regard to what officials say. Believing or disbelieving officials is not a reliable guide. What they say is a data point only.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:45:31 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 07:22:16 AM
   So you ignore what the lack of evidence for the Wuhan lab release means

The lack of evidence for the Wuhan lab means one thing and only one thing: absent any solid evidence either way, it might or might not be true that they did not have the virus.

You choose to believe they tell the truth. There's nothing to support your belief, save their statement and your a priori belief that all scientists are rigorously honest and never give in to ideological and political pressure from authorities and they'll tell the truth no matter what. Neither the statement, nor your belief qualify as solid evidence against "accidental lab release" theory.

I choose to believe they might not tell the truth. There's nothing to support my belief, save my a priori distrust of statements coming from Communist officials and the verified fact that Communist officials lied on numerous occasions, evidence for their lying surfacing in some case many years if not decades after they lied. Neither the distrust nor the verified fact qualify as solid evidence for the "accidental lab release" theory.

So neither of us has any solid evidence for the position we hold. Therefore, until and unless there is evidence "for" or evidence "against" the "accidental lab release" theory, back on my ignore list you go.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 08:24:46 AM
     
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:45:31 AM


You choose to believe they tell the truth.

     Only on the evidence known around the world that the "they" in question tell the truth as part of their job do I accept the default position as what it is. Scientists around the world communicate with Chinese labs well beyond what ChiCom officials would like. Some were even punished for doing so. A lab release would have set off exactly the kind of alarm signals intelligence officials looked for and didn't find. Of course they didn't find them. Of course world class experts in China can't be muzzled for months on end about what made them reliable experts in the first place. Of course scientists around the world don't buy tit for tat propaganda from Trumpeo or their ChiCom counterparts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 06, 2020, 08:36:37 AM
Quote from: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 08:24:46 AM
     
     Only on the evidence known around the world that the "they" in question tell the truth as part of their job do I accept the default position as what it is. Scientists around the world communicate with Chinese labs well beyond what ChiCom officials would like. Some were even punished for doing so. A lab release would have set off exactly the kind of alarm signals intelligence officials looked for and didn't find. Of course they didn't find them. Of course world class experts in China can't be muzzled for months on end about what made them reliable experts in the first place. Of course scientists around the world don't buy tit for tat propaganda from Trumpeo or their ChiCom counterparts.

Most of what you say there is actually unproveable assumption. But if intelligence did not pick up any chatter (something none of us here are in a position to know) , the lack of chatter did not keep them from saying they can't rule out lab release.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 08:41:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:45:31 AM

I choose to believe they might not tell the truth.



     So do I. That is not evidence that they had something to lie about.

     You want to establish a thesis that something happened if there is no proof that it didn't. Most falsehoods are never disproved. People just give up on them and move on. I don't think disproof of this political fantasy will ever pop up. Absent the political context and hyperemotional state of of some people it will collapse. People will simply forget to "pray" this one into existence any more.

Quote from: JBS on May 06, 2020, 08:36:37 AM
Most of what you say there is actually unproveable assumption. But if intelligence did not pick up any chatter (something none of us here are in a position to know) , the lack of chatter did not keep them from saying they can't rule out lab release.

     Yup, most bogusity is never disproved. That's not a reason for believing anything. I have no intention of claiming disproof of the infinite nonsense that people come up with. It's a waste of energy and often impossible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2020, 08:49:32 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 06, 2020, 07:01:20 AM
(Drat, did I just reply to a poster I ignore?  ;D )


Not at all, for you cannot reply to anyone whom you ignore.  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 08:58:59 AM

     Ignorance is no excuse. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif) (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/tongue.gif) (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 06, 2020, 09:38:20 AM

     Virus Survey Finds Most Patients Retired or Unemployed: Live Updates (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/nyregion/coronavirus-new-york-update.html)

    57 percent of hospitalized people were from New York City.

    In the city, 45 percent of hospitalized patients were African-American or Latino.

    Only 3 percent in New York City had been using public transportation.

    96 percent had other underlying health conditions.

    37 percent were retired, and 46 percent were unemployed.


     So essential workers using public transportation do not contribute much to the new case total in NY.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rinaldo on May 06, 2020, 10:21:37 AM
Ed Yong to the rescue:

The Problem With Stories About Dangerous Coronavirus Mutations (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/coronavirus-strains-transmissible/611239/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 06, 2020, 10:39:38 AM
You couldn't make it up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/05/uk-coronavirus-adviser-prof-neil-ferguson-resigns-after-breaking-lockdown-rules
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 06, 2020, 10:47:08 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 06, 2020, 10:39:38 AM
You couldn't make it up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/05/uk-coronavirus-adviser-prof-neil-ferguson-resigns-after-breaking-lockdown-rules
I read about that earlier today on the BBC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 06, 2020, 02:12:05 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 06, 2020, 10:47:08 AM
I read about that earlier today on the BBC.
How do you access the BBC PD?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 06, 2020, 02:28:22 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 06, 2020, 02:12:05 PM
How do you access the BBC PD?
One can access it for free in the US at least via internet:  https://www.bbc.com

I'm very thankful for the access and the articles and news from a different perspective...and/or coverage of a certain news story--period.  I suspect that they recoup at least some of their expenses via advertising (of which there is a fair bit).  I think that now I would need to register at least in order to listen to any of your radio stations (which I used to be able to in the past without doing so).

Best wishes,

PD

p.s.  Also, some (30 minute) segments on PBS on t.v.  Are you familiar with what PBS is Jeffrey?  More via t.v. depending upon how much you're willing to pay for various subscription packages.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on May 06, 2020, 04:38:57 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 06, 2020, 02:12:05 PM
How do you access the BBC PD?

The BBC is also broadcast by public radio stations in the US, in my area mostly from 11pm to 6am, and 9am to 10am,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 06, 2020, 07:06:55 PM
Felling sick you think it's covid 19 starting here are fews tricks to feel better.

- if you feel a mild headache take tylenol now don't wait

-Use mouth wash (scop) regulary

- by febreeze air effect vaporize a kleenex than blow in it strongly

-burn  lots of frankencens, white sage whatever  but not cheap one

- Take two bath or shower a day

- if you work use big oceanic salt in the bath, it's anti-bacteria
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 06, 2020, 08:59:15 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 06, 2020, 07:06:55 PM

-burn  lots of frankencens, white sage whatever  but not cheap one


Guaranteed to give me a skull-drilling vomit-inducing migraine, so no thanks.

I cant even be in the same room as an unopened packet of incense without feeling sick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on May 07, 2020, 02:54:06 AM
The UK's handling of Covid viewed from abroad:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/complacent-uk-draws-global-criticism-for-covid-19-response-boris-johnson (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/complacent-uk-draws-global-criticism-for-covid-19-response-boris-johnson)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 05:02:59 AM
Per the Graun, Covid-19 deaths in Europe pass 150,000.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 07, 2020, 06:33:50 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 06, 2020, 02:28:22 PM
One can access it for free in the US at least via internet:  https://www.bbc.com

I'm very thankful for the access and the articles and news from a different perspective...and/or coverage of a certain news story--period.  I suspect that they recoup at least some of their expenses via advertising (of which there is a fair bit).  I think that now I would need to register at least in order to listen to any of your radio stations (which I used to be able to in the past without doing so).

Best wishes,

PD

p.s.  Also, some (30 minute) segments on PBS on t.v.  Are you familiar with what PBS is Jeffrey?  More via t.v. depending upon how much you're willing to pay for various subscription packages.

Interesting - thanks PD (and BV) - I had heard of PBS. I looked it up and it defaulted to 'PBS Kids'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 07, 2020, 06:39:46 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on May 07, 2020, 02:54:06 AM
The UK's handling of Covid viewed from abroad:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/complacent-uk-draws-global-criticism-for-covid-19-response-boris-johnson (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/complacent-uk-draws-global-criticism-for-covid-19-response-boris-johnson)
V interesting if dispiriting to read. Thanks for posting this Olivier.
Johnson is indeed not a 'details' man. His earlier approach rather reminded me of the Mayor in 'Jaws' who keeps the beaches open despite the shark attacks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 07, 2020, 08:35:26 AM

     Read the CDC Coronavirus Document the White House Didn't Want You to See (https://www.thedailybeast.com/read-the-cdc-coronavirus-document-the-white-house-didnt-want-you-to-see?ref=home)

     All Power to the Deep State!

     (https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0f9611e0601df36714e58afe6897a6869e1295cb/0_51_2400_1440/master/2400.jpg?width=605&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=ad62737daebb4acf89709daca9a5c17a)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 07, 2020, 08:51:06 AM
  He openly admitted in March that he did not want to let infected patients from a cruise ship disembark because it would increase the number of cases counted in
  the United States. He essentially made the same calculation on Wednesday by saying that more testing only reveals more infections and therefore increases the
  numbers. "In a way, by doing all this testing we make ourselves look bad," he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-recovery.html?referringSource=articleShare

He said this yesterday.  This guy is going to kill millions and destroy the country to get re-elected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 09:03:25 AM
Quote from: Daverz on May 07, 2020, 08:51:06 AMThis guy is going to kill millions and destroy the country to get re-elected.


Millions.  You read it first here on GMG.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 07, 2020, 09:35:47 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 07, 2020, 06:33:50 AM
Interesting - thanks PD (and BV) - I had heard of PBS. I looked it up and it defaulted to 'PBS Kids'.
Thanks BV...can't believe that I forgot to mention about the radio!   ::)

Here's the website Jeffrey:  https://www.pbs.org  It's free (with even basic t.v.), but not free in the sense that they don't get much assistance from the government in terms of funding....forget what the percentage is.  Like NPR (National Public Radio), they are basically funded by donations from individuals and businesses.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 07, 2020, 10:20:43 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 09:03:25 AM

Millions.  You read it first here on GMG.

Millions is maybe a little exaggerated, but it's not too hard (granted one's human) to understand Daverz sentiment.

USA is saddled with a prez who's willing to sacrifice part of the population in order to have a chance at reelection.

(Even though he'd probably be happier to just go home and do a tv show.)

The only thing you think of is your bank account, but some people are unhappy or scared to be a part of this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 10:24:44 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 07, 2020, 10:20:43 AMMillions is maybe a little exaggerated

More than a little.  Much more.


Quote from: Herman on May 07, 2020, 10:20:43 AMbut it's not too hard (granted one's human) to understand Daverz sentiment.

True, some people just can't control their emotions at all and blurt out anti-rational statements in a knee-jerk fashion.  I've seen it all my life.


Quote from: Herman on May 07, 2020, 10:20:43 AMThe only thing you think of is your bank account

More of your fourth-rate fiction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 11:33:29 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 10:24:44 AM

some people just can't control their emotions at all and blurt out anti-rational statements in a knee-jerk fashion. 

Physician: heal thyself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 07, 2020, 11:42:24 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52543692

QuoteCambridge University statistician Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter has highlighted evidence which shows the risk of dying from coronavirus is very similar to the underlying risk people of all age groups from early 20s upwards have of dying anyway.


Does that mean that we're no more at risk of dying now than we were before COVID19? Or does it mean that the presence of COVID19 doubles our risk of dying? Or what? Statistics boff - Scarpia -- help! I've forgotten this stuff.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 07, 2020, 11:43:57 AM
Quote from: Daverz on May 07, 2020, 08:51:06 AM

  the United States. He essentially made the same calculation on Wednesday by saying that more testing only reveals more infections and therefore increases the
  numbers. "In a way, by doing all this testing we make ourselves look bad," he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-recovery.html?referringSource=articleShare



Which shows his stupidity. The more otherwise unknown cases testing reveals, the lower the hospitalization rate and mortality rate. And also the sooner and quicker we can start opening up would be, since it would be that many less people to worry about.
The first point  he doesn't care about, but the second point he does.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 12:19:55 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 11:33:29 AM
Physician: heal thyself.


It's supposed to be a comma, not a colon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 12:58:09 PM
Did you pause for even a second to consider the message?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 01:07:40 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 12:58:09 PM
Did you pause for even a second to consider the message?


You think your post was sophisticated?

Anyway, you obviously need some assistance using platitudes. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 07, 2020, 01:16:38 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 12:19:55 PM

It's supposed to be a comma, not a colon.

Reely/ Too take issue with soch a selllie misstace<
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 01:17:55 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 01:07:40 PM

You think your post was sophisticated?

Anyway, you obviously need some assistance using platitudes. 

sigh...does every conversation with you have to be like pulling teeth?

It was deliberately unsophisticated. It was a very simple statement followed by a very simple question. It should be very easy to answer.

I think this sentence of yours: "some people just can't control their emotions at all and blurt out anti-rational statements in a knee-jerk fashion. " often applies more to your own posts than the people you're arguing with.

Could there, perhaps, be a glimmer of truth in that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 01:25:25 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 01:17:55 PM
sigh...does every conversation with you have to be like pulling teeth?

It was deliberately unsophisticated. It was a very simple statement followed by a very simple question. It should be very easy to answer.

I think this sentence of yours: "some people just can't control their emotions at all and blurt out anti-rational statements in a knee-jerk fashion. " often applies more to your own posts than the people you're arguing with.

Could there, perhaps, be a glimmer of truth in that?


Very thoughtful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 01:32:00 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on May 07, 2020, 01:16:38 PM
Reely/ Too take issue with soch a selllie misstace<

Actually I prefer it with a colon. If I use the phrase again - and I'm sure I'll be given the opportunity - I'll do it that way again. Correct or not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 07, 2020, 01:51:58 PM
sigh

meanwhile...

Covid-19 found in semen of infected men, say Chinese doctors
Study based on small number of patients opens up chance of sexual transmission (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/07/covid-19-found-in-semen-of-infected-men-say-chinese-doctors)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 07, 2020, 02:12:39 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 09:03:25 AM

Millions.  You read it first here on GMG.

Sorry, I meant to say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 03:21:37 PM
Quote from: Daverz on May 07, 2020, 02:12:39 PM
Sorry, I meant to say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks.


Surely you have a link to this estimate of yours.  Or did you come up with it all by yourself?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 07, 2020, 03:54:31 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 03:21:37 PM

Surely you have a link to this estimate of yours.  Or did you come up with it all by yourself?
Doesn't seem so controversial. In the absence of social distancing most models were predicting a few million deaths in the US.

https://www.hpnonline.com/infection-prevention/screening-surveillance/article/21130206/covid19-predicted-to-infect-81-of-us-population-cause-22-million-deaths-in-us
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Archaic Torso of Apollo on May 07, 2020, 05:21:09 PM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 03:21:37 PM

Surely you have a link to this estimate of yours.  Or did you come up with it all by yourself?

Here's the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuP6KbIsNK4

Starts about 2:13.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 07, 2020, 06:06:02 PM
Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on May 07, 2020, 05:21:09 PM
Here's the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuP6KbIsNK4

Starts about 2:13.


Alas, I can't recall every reference to now antiquated pop culture. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 08, 2020, 05:09:28 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 07, 2020, 09:03:25 AM

Millions.

Well lets hope not that much, but Trump's incompetence probably doubles or triples the death toll compared to what it would be if the US had a competent leader.

That said, mr Trump is not the only problem in the US regarding Covid-19. The whole for-profit model of healthcare together with corporate corruption and weak social safety nets are quite problematic in handling pandemics like this in ways that won't cause devastation among the people. Trump's incompetence merely makes a bad situation even worse.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 08, 2020, 05:31:54 AM
Souplantation Announces It Is Closing All of Its Restaurants Permanently in the Wake of Coronavirus (https://people.com/food/souplantation-announces-closing-all-restaurants-permanently-coronavirus-pandemic/)

Damn you!  Damn you SARS-CoV-2 to hell!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 08, 2020, 07:01:43 AM
According to French doctors in Alsace, they've apparently found the virus there in 16 cases from mid-November and December 2019. The assumption is mostly based on analyzing x-rays, however, but one case is said to be absolutely certain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 08, 2020, 07:33:44 AM
UN chief says pandemic is unleashing a 'tsunami of hate' (https://apnews.com/1cb35188b728f8f885561d00cfaa75f6)


Quote from: Edith M LedererHe called on the media, especially social media, to "remove racist, misogynist and other harmful content," on civil society to strengthen their outreach to vulnerable people, and on religious figures to serve as "models of mutual respect."

All nation states need to create a Ministry of Truth, I guess.  On the upside, no one takes the UN seriously.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 08, 2020, 10:58:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 08, 2020, 07:01:43 AM
According to French doctors in Alsace, they've apparently found the virus there in 16 cases from mid-November and December 2019. The assumption is mostly based on analyzing x-rays, however, but one case is said to be absolutely certain.

The specificity of X-rays (CT scans I suppose) in this context is questionable. But the absolutely certain one, how was it diagnosed? Did they have material for a virus test?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 08, 2020, 11:04:51 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 08, 2020, 10:58:28 AM
The specificity of X-rays (CT scans I suppose) in this context is questionable. But the absolutely certain one, how was it diagnosed? Did they have material for a virus test?

It's not just a quick, superficial comparison, but seems rather comprehensively done.

I only read it on Danish TV2, so in Danish, but it's a rather thorough article for that source.
I didn't have the energy to look for English sources, but surely the story will become internationally published.

It was at Colmar, the Albert Schweitzer Hospital, so people can use that for googling. Colmar is a place of pilgrimage for Chinese tourists, due to television series locations.

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2020-05-08-laeger-finder-spor-af-covid-19-i-europa-fra-foer-sygdommen-blev-opdaget-i-kina
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 08, 2020, 11:16:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 08, 2020, 11:04:51 AM
It's not just a quick, superficial comparison, but seems rather comprehensively done.

I only read it on Danish TV2, so in Danish, but it's a rather thorough article for that source.
I didn't have the energy to look for English sources, but surely the story will become internationally published.

It was at Colmar, the Albert Schweitzer Hospital, so people can use that for googling. Colmar is a place of pilgrimage for Chinese tourists, due to television series locations.

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2020-05-08-laeger-finder-spor-af-covid-19-i-europa-fra-foer-sygdommen-blev-opdaget-i-kina

Thanks. Very interesting article. The decisive test for these patients must be an antibody-test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 08, 2020, 08:07:20 PM
I found this interesting link:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/what-are-we-doing-doctors-are-fed-conspiracies-ravaging-ers-n1201446?utm_source=pocket-newtab (https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/what-are-we-doing-doctors-are-fed-conspiracies-ravaging-ers-n1201446?utm_source=pocket-newtab)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 08, 2020, 11:30:24 PM
Sad story. That doctor should indeed not waste his time on facebook arguing with crazies after a long day work in the ICU.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 08, 2020, 11:35:12 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on May 08, 2020, 08:07:20 PM
I found this interesting link:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/what-are-we-doing-doctors-are-fed-conspiracies-ravaging-ers-n1201446?utm_source=pocket-newtab (https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/what-are-we-doing-doctors-are-fed-conspiracies-ravaging-ers-n1201446?utm_source=pocket-newtab)

Modern information technology has demonstrated that more information doesn't necessarily lead to more common sense. We moved from the age of mass (state) propaganda to the age of mass information.

I'm not sure if the result is any better....   ;)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 08, 2020, 11:56:24 PM
Well, I seem to have missed the era of mass state propaganda, when was this?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 09, 2020, 12:11:42 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 08, 2020, 11:56:24 PM
Well, I seem to have missed the era of mass state propaganda, when was this?

What about the larger part of the 20th century?

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 12:22:17 AM
Possibly some major break-throughs on the vaccine: Chinese scientists from the Sinovac vaccine company say that a traditional flu vaccine, PiCoVacc, that seems to work against corona on apes, and they are going to test in on humans globally now. There were no side-effects on the apes.

".... the results showed that our vaccine candidate offered safe and complete protection in rhesus macaques against SARS- CoV-2 strains," commented Mr. Weidong Yin, Chairman, President, and CEO of Sinovac.
"... Beijing-based Sinovac Biotech Ltd. is in discussion with regulators in other countries, and the World Health Organization, to launch phase III clinical trials in regions where the novel coronavirus is still spreading rapidly, CEO Yin Weidong said in an interview Thursday. "To evaluate whether the vaccine can give protection, we need to study the relation between disease incidence and vaccination," Yin said. "You can't do that when there's no cases.""

EDIT: reactions from leading Danish scientists are very positive. The vaccine uses old principles and technology, which should also facilitate its testing and production. Overall, you use dead virus, insert something like it in the body, and the body starts working to destroy it. The Danish scientists say that a time-span on 1.5 years for general availability seems reasonable, unless severe side-effects are discovered.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200506005601/en/Sinovac-Announces-Animal-Study-Results-Vaccine-COVID-19

https://www.livemint.com/news/world/coronavirus-china-s-sinovac-biotech-in-talks-to-test-covid-19-vaccine-globally-11588937378011.html

(scientific: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/06/science.abc1932; Danish: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-05-09-ny-coronavaccine-kaldes-oldnordisk-og-primitiv-men-den-virker-paa-aber)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 09, 2020, 12:28:49 AM
Quote from: Que on May 09, 2020, 12:11:42 AM
What about the larger part of the 20th century?

Q

What I did, in my part of that Century is what I do now.

I read a couple of newspapers that are obviously not state-controlled, and I read books, some of which were written far before the 20th century.

I do recall quitting watching tv (Dutch tv) when I got the feeling it was not for me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 09, 2020, 12:48:58 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 09, 2020, 12:28:49 AM
What I did, in my part of that Century is what I do now.

I read a couple of newspapers that are obviously not state-controlled, and I read books, some of which were written far before the 20th century.

I do recall quitting watching tv (Dutch tv) when I got the feeling it was not for me.

There must be a misunderstanding. I (obviously) wasn't implying that all information was the product of state or ideological propaganda or manipulation, just like not all information available to us now is misinformation. But its occurence was before, during and after WWII definitely real.

The Cold War ended in 1991. When mass misinformation became a widespread phenomenon, I'm not sure. Must be a while ago?

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 09, 2020, 02:06:55 PM
According to Belgian and American researchers llamas can help treat coronavirus:

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-llamas-could-help-with-antibody-treatments-for-the-coronavirus-2020-5
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 09, 2020, 08:38:37 PM


https://www.erinbromage.com/post/the-risks-know-them-avoid-them

". . . my goal here is to try to guide you away from situations of high risk. . ."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 08:42:11 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 09, 2020, 08:38:37 PM

https://www.erinbromage.com/post/the-risks-know-them-avoid-them

". . . my goal here is to try to guide you away from situations of high risk. . ."

The link stops; one needs to do registering/subscription to read anything, not knowing anything about any of the content beforehand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 09, 2020, 11:21:11 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 08:42:11 PM
The link stops; one needs to do registering/subscription to read anything, not knowing anything about any of the content beforehand.

That's a shame, I thought it was potentially very useful. It's a journalistic article, written by a Biology professor at a university in Massachusetts, looking at the risks of become infected in various situations which we're likely to encounter more and more as lockdown is eased.

I can't copy the whole thing, here's a handful of paragraphs

QuoteIndoor spaces, with limited air exchange or recycled air and lots of people, are concerning from a transmission standpoint. We know that 60 people in a volleyball court-sized room (choir) results in massive infections. Same situation with the restaurant and the call center.  Social distancing guidelines don't hold in indoor spaces where you spend a lot of time, as people on the opposite side of the room were infected. 

The principle is viral exposure over an extended period of time. In all these cases, people were exposed to the virus in the air for a prolonged period (hours). Even if they were 50 feet away (choir or call center), even a low dose of the virus in the air reaching them, over a sustained period, was enough to cause infection and in some cases, death.
 
Social distancing rules are really to protect you with brief exposures or outdoor exposures. In these situations there is not enough time to achieve the infectious viral load when you are standing 6 feet apart or where wind and the infinite outdoor space for viral dilution reduces viral load. The effects of sunlight, heat, and humidity on viral survival, all serve to minimize the risk to everyone when outside.

When assessing the risk of infection (via respiration) at the grocery store or mall, you need to consider the volume of the air space (very large), the number of people (restricted), how long people are spending in the store (workers - all day; customers - an hour). Taken together, for a person shopping: the low density, high air volume of the store, along with the restricted time you spend in the store, means that the opportunity to receive an infectious dose is low. But, for the store worker, the extended time they spend in the store provides a greater opportunity to receive the infectious dose and therefore the job becomes more risky.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 11:22:14 PM
Thank you for the clarification, which us useful - and calming :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 10, 2020, 02:16:48 AM
Interesting graph of the total of deaths per week (irrespective of cause of death) in the Netherlands:


(https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2020-05/sterfte_lag1_2pis_tm_20200429.jpeg)

The spike on the left is the flu epidemic of the winter of 2017, the spike on the right is the impact of the COVID pandemic.

Of course we don't know how this would have looked like without the special containment measures.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 10, 2020, 05:26:52 AM
Why we're reading bucket list books in quarantine (https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/5/9/21251999/bucket-list-books-coronavirus-quarantine)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 10, 2020, 06:36:43 AM
Quote from: Que on May 10, 2020, 02:16:48 AM
Interesting graph of the total of deaths per week (irrespective of cause of death) in the Netherlands:


(https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2020-05/sterfte_lag1_2pis_tm_20200429.jpeg)

The spike on the left is the flu epidemic of the winter of 2017, the spike on the right is the impact of the COVID pandemic.

Of course we don't know how this would have looked like without the special containment measures.

Q

Is anyone estimating what proportion of the excess deaths are caused by COVID, rather than, for example, people just not getting hospital treatment for other conditions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 10, 2020, 07:33:37 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 11:22:14 PM
Thank you for the clarification, which us useful - and calming :)

I was just able to read the article in full. The link made no attempt to have me register or subscribe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 10, 2020, 10:16:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 09, 2020, 12:22:17 AM
Possibly some major break-throughs on the vaccine: Chinese scientists from the Sinovac vaccine company say that a traditional flu vaccine, PiCoVacc, that seems to work against corona on apes, and they are going to test in on humans globally now. There were no side-effects on the apes.

".... the results showed that our vaccine candidate offered safe and complete protection in rhesus macaques against SARS- CoV-2 strains," commented Mr. Weidong Yin, Chairman, President, and CEO of Sinovac.
"... Beijing-based Sinovac Biotech Ltd. is in discussion with regulators in other countries, and the World Health Organization, to launch phase III clinical trials in regions where the novel coronavirus is still spreading rapidly, CEO Yin Weidong said in an interview Thursday. "To evaluate whether the vaccine can give protection, we need to study the relation between disease incidence and vaccination," Yin said. "You can't do that when there's no cases.""

EDIT: reactions from leading Danish scientists are very positive. The vaccine uses old principles and technology, which should also facilitate its testing and production. Overall, you use dead virus, insert something like it in the body, and the body starts working to destroy it. The Danish scientists say that a time-span on 1.5 years for general availability seems reasonable, unless severe side-effects are discovered.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200506005601/en/Sinovac-Announces-Animal-Study-Results-Vaccine-COVID-19

https://www.livemint.com/news/world/coronavirus-china-s-sinovac-biotech-in-talks-to-test-covid-19-vaccine-globally-11588937378011.html

(scientific: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/06/science.abc1932; Danish: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-05-09-ny-coronavaccine-kaldes-oldnordisk-og-primitiv-men-den-virker-paa-aber)

What you have written at the top, about the flu vaccine conferring immunity to CoV, doesn't make sense and I don't see reference to it skimming the articles you cite. vaccines are very specific, polio vaccine does not protect against measles, etc, and flu vaccines themselves have to be reformulated every year because different strains of the flu propagate every year. What is the same is the basic premise, introducing a small amount of a weak strain of the virus, or of a fragment of the virus, that can provoke an immune response without causing illness.

Public health officials and politicians can't entirely rely on optimistic assumptions that a vaccine will be available in a short time line due to miraculous advances in medical science. Just from having my kid vaccinated, I know there are vaccines for which you have to wait months for the person to develop an immune response, and others where immunity decays away unless a booster vaccine is given a set time afterwards. Even presented with a working vaccine, it can take years to determine that it is safe, that it works, and what the sufficient and safe dosage is.

And there could be no vaccine. Someone has to be thinking about how to resume our culture with Covid-19 as a seasonal disease, like flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 10, 2020, 11:19:21 AM
A new analysis: Coronavirus death rate surged in Massachusetts locations that already faced challenges
Harvard analysis finds mortality rate surged higher in communities with more poverty, people of color, and crowded housing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 10, 2020, 12:14:17 PM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 10, 2020, 10:16:09 AM
What you have written at the top, about the flu vaccine conferring immunity to CoV, doesn't make sense and I don't see reference to it skimming the articles you cite. vaccines are very specific, polio vaccine does not protect against measles, etc, and flu vaccines themselves have to be reformulated every year because different strains of the flu propagate every year. What is the same is the basic premise, introducing a small amount of a weak strain of the virus, or of a fragment of the virus, that can provoke an immune response without causing illness.

Public health officials and politicians can't entirely rely on optimistic assumptions that a vaccine will be available in a short time line due to miraculous advances in medical science. Just from having my kid vaccinated, I know there are vaccines for which you have to wait months for the person to develop an immune response, and others where immunity decays away unless a booster vaccine is given a set time afterwards. Even presented with a working vaccine, it can take years to determine that it is safe, that it works, and what the sufficient and safe dosage is.

And there could be no vaccine. Someone has to be thinking about how to resume our culture with Covid-19 as a seasonal disease, like flu.

I am just referring to the summary of the Danish media, including the views of Danish scientists concerning the mentioned vaccine described there, and some recent English-language sources, including quotes from the articles.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 10, 2020, 04:02:39 PM
Trick to fight covid 19

buy some honey  take regular scoop , tea spoon enought  4 time a day

Do the same whit mouth wash  use iit 4 time a day.

Take care and eat lost of agrume (orange, pine apple, clementine etc)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 10, 2020, 06:24:00 PM
In an editorial in the Washington Post a writer brought up an old classic joke.

There was a flood and in order to escape the rising waters a man took refuge on the roof of his home.

Along came a man in a row boat and offered to save him. The man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

A little later a man in a motor boat came by and offered to save him. Again the man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

Finally a helicopter flew by and threw him a rope. Again the man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

Eventually he was swept away by the waters and drowned.

When he got to heaven he asked God why he did not save him.

God responded, "I sent you a row boat, a motor boat and a helicopter. What more did you want?"

I know. it is a moldy oldie.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 10, 2020, 07:17:46 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 10, 2020, 04:02:39 PM
Trick to fight covid 19

buy some honey  take regular scoop , tea spoon enought  4 time a day

Do the same whit mouth wash  use iit 4 time a day.

Take care and eat lost of agrume (orange, pine apple, clementine etc)

Please link to any covid-related medical research supporting this.


That may be considerably less harmful than recommending drinking bleach or fish-tank cleaner, but its still misinformation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 10, 2020, 07:22:51 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on May 10, 2020, 06:24:00 PM

God responded, "I sent you a row boat, a motor boat and a helicopter. What more did you want?"


"What I'd want is for you to not send floods."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 10, 2020, 07:41:32 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 10, 2020, 07:17:46 PM
Please link to any covid-related medical research supporting this.


That may be considerably less harmful than recommending drinking bleach or fish-tank cleaner, but its still misinformation.

The mouthwash would presumably be effective on any virus that it can reach in your mouth.

My former GP used to say honey has antibiotic properties, but said nothing to suggest it works against viruses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 10, 2020, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 10, 2020, 07:41:32 PM
The mouthwash would presumably be effective on any virus that it can reach in your mouth.

Listerine claims to kill "99.9" of germs that cause gingivitis. Aside from the absurdity of the 99.9% number, this would mean it has antibacterial activity, not anti-viral activity. Some varieties of Listerine contain alcohol, but not in high enough concentration to serve as a disinfectant. (I believe 60% alcohol is cites as sufficient.)

No, excessive use of Listerine is not harmful, bit thinking you are protected when you are not could lead to taking ill-advised risks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on May 10, 2020, 11:52:26 PM
"My former GP used to say honey has antibiotic properties, but said nothing to suggest it works against viruses."

"Antibiotic properties". first of all, honey is primarily made up of sugar. But it is not as simple as that:

"....This study suggests that 13 strains of LAB taken from honeybees' stomachs are effective against a yeast and several bacteria that are often present in human wounds. Although the experiments suggested that the LABs could inhibit the bacteria more than some antibiotics, they did not show that this effect was large enough to be relatively certain it did not occur by chance. All of the tests were done in a laboratory environment, so it remains to be seen whether similar effects would be seen when treating real human wounds.

There were some aspects of the study that were not clear, including the antibiotic dose that was used and whether the dose used was optimal, or had already been used in the clinical setting where the species were collected. The authors also report that an antibiotic was used as a control for each bacteria and the yeast, but this is not clearly presented in the tables of the study, making it difficult to assess whether this is correct.

The study has shown that each LAB produces a different amount or type of potentially toxic substances. It is not clear how these substances interact to combat the infections, but it appears that they work more effectively in combination.

Low concentrations of some of the substances that could be killing the bacteria and yeast were found in shop-bought honey, but this study does not prove that they would have antibacterial effects. In addition, as the researchers point out, shop-bought honey does not contain any LABs".

Read the complete article at:

https://www.nhs.uk/news/medication/bacteria-found-in-honey-may-help-fight-infection/

And don't forget:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/infectious-diseases/expert-answers/infectious-disease/faq-20058098
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 11, 2020, 12:38:23 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on May 10, 2020, 06:24:00 PM
In an editorial in the Washington Post a writer brought up an old classic joke.

There was a flood and in order to escape the rising waters a man took refuge on the roof of his home.

Along came a man in a row boat and offered to save him. The man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

A little later a man in a motor boat came by and offered to save him. Again the man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

Finally a helicopter flew by and threw him a rope. Again the man on the roof responded that there was no need. God would save him.

Eventually he was swept away by the waters and drowned.

When he got to heaven he asked God why he did not save him.

God responded, "I sent you a row boat, a motor boat and a helicopter. What more did you want?"

I know. it is a moldy oldie.

A classic indeed. Here's another one.

A man was driving to an interview for a job he desperately needed. When he arrived at the office building, the parking lots were all occupied. After 10 minutes of driving around and no free lot in sight, as the time of the interview approached rapidly, he began to pray: "Please, God, make it so that I find a place to park to my car. I promise I won't drink nor womanize anymore if you do just that, plus I'll donate half of my first salary to a charity!" No sooner had he finished the prayer that a car which was parked 5 meters away from him left the parking lot. The guy then said "Ah, very good. Lord, forget about the whole thing, there's no need anymore."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 11, 2020, 05:55:58 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 10, 2020, 08:02:51 PM
Listerine claims to kill "99.9" of germs that cause gingivitis. Aside from the absurdity of the 99.9% number, this would mean it has antibacterial activity, not anti-viral activity. Some varieties of Listerine contain alcohol, but not in high enough concentration to serve as a disinfectant. (I believe 60% alcohol is cites as sufficient.)

No, excessive use of Listerine is not harmful, bit thinking you are protected when you are not could lead to taking ill-advised risks.

Indeed. A mouthwash is designed to kill bacteria that cause bad breath, period. The label on my mouthwash bottle says the alcohol content is 8%. It has no effect on viruses. Only soap or javel kill the coronavirus by contact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 11, 2020, 09:43:56 AM
Quote from: André on May 11, 2020, 05:55:58 AM
Indeed. A mouthwash is designed to kill bacteria that cause bad breath, period. The label on my mouthwash bottle says the alcohol content is 8%. It has no effect on viruses. Only soap or javel kill the coronavirus by contact.

Had to look up javel AKA bleach AKA sodium hypochlorite.  I thought you were advocating something to do with coffee at first.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 11, 2020, 11:39:45 AM
This thread is more chaotic than a horde of gay zombies invading a football stadium during the Super Bowl trying to eat a few thousand peepees so they can acquire the power to merge into a super zombie that can be used by the CIA to broadcast mind control signals.

...while simultaneously monkeys are thrown in the stadium with the intent of throwing their poo everywhere to prevent people from escaping.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 11, 2020, 12:51:31 PM
Quote from: greg on May 11, 2020, 11:39:45 AM
This thread is more chaotic than a horde of gay zombies invading a football stadium during the Super Bowl trying to eat a few thousand peepees so they can acquire the power to merge into a super zombie that can be used by the CIA to broadcast mind control signals.

...while simultaneously monkeys are thrown in the stadium with the intent of throwing their poo everywhere to prevent people from escaping.

     Though it's an accurate description of the thread, I find nothing to worry about in a gay CIA zombie infestation. Monkeys in a football stadium sounds like an urban myth.

     In Massachusetts the new case totals are dropping. Daily deaths have leveled off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 11, 2020, 05:11:57 PM
Now  how about  garlicand onion benefit against bacteria a Friend a Lebanese dude told me ...

Ognion soup whit garlic often could be good for covid, he said eat daily onions and garlic or garlic sauce  (just like in lebanese  dish).

Maple syrup is another thing too like honey not proven 100% , but are ancestor use it for sick people????

What do you think guys?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 11, 2020, 05:26:56 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 11, 2020, 05:11:57 PM
Now  how about  garlicand onion benefit against bacteria a Friend a Lebanese dude told me ...

Ognion soup whit garlic often could be good for covid, he said eat daily onions and garlic or garlic sauce  (just like in lebanese  dish).

Maple syrup is another thing too like honey not proven 100% , but are ancestor use it for sick people????

What do you think guys?

Daily onions and garlic or garlic sauce is a surefire recipe for proper social distanciation. That's an excellent start!  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 11, 2020, 05:30:14 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 11, 2020, 05:11:57 PM

What do you think guys?

I think I'm actually insulted that you're continuing to post home remedies for minor illness on the coronavirus thread.

Please stop.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 11, 2020, 05:40:35 PM
This thread is starting to remind me of the pages of the Talmud being read today and tomorrow as part of the Daf Yomi cycle
https://www.sefaria.org/Shabbat.66b?lang=bi

Start reading with
QuoteGEMARA: We learned in the mishna that young boys may go out on Shabbat with knots. The Gemara asks: What are these knots? Adda Mari said that Rav Naḥman bar Barukh said that Rav Ashi bar Avin said that Rav Yehuda said: They are garlands of the madder plant that are tied for their medicinal qualities.

Then whole thing stretches out almost to the end of folio 67, and gets really wierd towards the end when it switches over to discussing non Jewish superstitions. (Although the Jewish ones are weird enough.)  But that's what people did for medicine in the Middle East c 300-400 CE.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 11, 2020, 05:43:26 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 11, 2020, 05:30:14 PM
I think I'm actually insulted that you're continuing to post home remedies for minor illness on the coronavirus thread.

Please stop.

Sorry buddy  SimonNZ , I,m only trying to do this out of good will for all , if you disagree , it's ok, but please don't be so harsh whit me,I,m only trying to suggest stuff that might  or might not work, don't take it that way please

:'(

p.s I WILL STOP but dont take it personnal do you have a grudge against me, you don't seem to like me, you criticize me all the f*ckin time why?? Simon do you hate me that much??

P.S SimonNZ , you're nick does it mean Simon  New zealand or Simon the nazi?

I DON'T DESERVE THIS KIND OF  RUBBISH TREATMENT, i use to like you're post now I see you seem to have a rotten tooth against me, for what living in stinking quebec , being french descent, we are all moron and that it for you, I,m angry and I,m the one that insulted... instead of fighting like children we should all be ''solidaire to this virus'' who whit me please?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 11, 2020, 06:45:20 PM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 11, 2020, 05:11:57 PM
Now  how about  garlicand onion benefit against bacteria a Friend a Lebanese dude told me ...

Ognion soup whit garlic often could be good for covid, he said eat daily onions and garlic or garlic sauce  (just like in lebanese  dish).

Maple syrup is another thing too like honey not proven 100% , but are ancestor use it for sick people????

What do you think guys?

They call garlic "Russian penicillin"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 11, 2020, 11:05:07 PM
In another forum the moderators closed down a coronavirus thread because the discussion got too political.  They are trying to start a new non-political thread.

I do not see how this is possible.

This issue has been political in the United States since this crisis began.

There are many Americans who still do not think this is a real crisis and the bases for their beliefs are political and religious.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 11, 2020, 11:15:51 PM
I saw on Fox news that there is a report that the bad economy could kill more people than the virus.  It implies that those of us on the left are unaware of the economic consequences of the pandemic.

Of course we are.  We are in a damn if we do damn if we don't situation.

My wife and I are at risk because we are in our seventies.  It is demoralizing to us that there are Americans who think we should die in order to save the economy.

We can not help but feel that if we had competent leadership, Republican or Democrat, we could have done a better job of dealing with this crises.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 11, 2020, 11:38:19 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on May 11, 2020, 11:15:51 PM
I saw on Fox news that there is a report that the bad economy could kill more people than the virus.  It implies that those of us on the left are unaware of the economic consequences of the pandemic.

1 it's bad thinking. If you send people (on threat of no-pay dismissal) back to work the workplace will become infested and people will die at a faster rate and wreck the economy, too.

2 don't watch Fox News.



QuoteMy wife and I are at risk because we are in our seventies.  It is demoralizing to us that there are Americans who think we should die in order to save the economy.

I'm sorry about that. What you can do is don't watch Fox and shield yourself from that meanspiritedness.

We can not help but feel that if we had competent leadership, Republican or Democrat, we could have done a better job of dealing with this crises.
[/quote]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 11, 2020, 11:55:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 11, 2020, 05:30:14 PM
I think I'm actually insulted that you're continuing to post home remedies for minor illness on the coronavirus thread.

I think you were actually born insulted.  ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 12:09:16 AM
Fine, dude.

If you or your loved ones way to protect yourselves from coronavirus go eat some honey and garlic.

You'll be sorted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 12, 2020, 12:20:44 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 12:09:16 AM
Fine, dude.

If you or your loved ones way to protect yourselves from coronavirus go eat some honey and garlic.

You'll be sorted.

Eating honey and garlic does not protect from Covid-19 but is good for one's health in general. You could use them too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 12:30:40 AM
Do you need me to explain this?

The deprofundis posts I was responding to were saying "to protect yourself from covid-19 here's what to do..."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 12, 2020, 12:42:09 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 12:30:40 AM
Do you need me to explain this?

I don't need you to explain anything because you distort and twist everything.

Quote
The deprofundis posts I was responding to were saying "to protect yourself from covid-19 here's what to do..."

It said nothing of the sort. It said "how about", "could be good" and "what do you think". You're being disingenuous, time and again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 01:05:09 AM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 10, 2020, 04:02:39 PM
Trick to fight covid 19

buy some honey  take regular scoop , tea spoon enought  4 time a day

Do the same whit mouth wash  use iit 4 time a day.

Take care and eat lost of agrume (orange, pine apple, clementine etc)

His post above was a follow up to this which I'd already pushed back against

Let's keep this up all night, Florestan. Let's try for a hundred posts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 12, 2020, 01:07:56 AM
That is not the post you replied to. You're being disingenuous, time and again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 12, 2020, 01:09:00 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 01:05:09 AM
Let's keep this up all night, Florestan. Let's try for a hundred posts.

No way. You joined drogulus on my ignore list.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 01:13:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on May 12, 2020, 01:07:56 AM
That is not the post you replied to. You're being disingenuous, time and again.

Oh but I did reply to that post. As deprofundis knows.

Hello...?

Helloooo...?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 12, 2020, 01:24:20 AM
I agree with Simon that posting stuff about folksy remedies on a thread dedicated to corona is not terribly helpful.

And sitting at home worshiping alcohol isn't going to keep one safe either. Getting some exercise and keeping your cardio-vascular system up and running would be a good idea.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on May 12, 2020, 01:42:08 AM

"I agree with Simon that posting stuff about folksy remedies on a thread dedicated to corona is not terribly helpful."
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 02:33:22 AM
The leading expert here, Kåre Mølbak, now says, that accumulated knowledge should make the impact of the feared second wave of the virus much more manageable, so that it should pose much less of a risk.

Enforced testing will be expanded further here too, likewise quarantine facilities, and the availability of protection gear etc.

(Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-12-kare-molbak-usandsynligt-at-der-kommer-en-anden-bolge-af-corona + https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-02-27-nyeste-corona-tal-fra-danmark-og-verden-saa-mange-er-smittede-doede-og-indlagte )
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 02:38:57 AM
It's horrible to say it with the hundreds of thousands of deaths etc but...

This may prove to be a useful training exercise for some future Captain Trips size event.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 03:37:56 AM
Are things still quite good down in New Zealand?

We've got the remote Faroe Islands, with 50,000 inhabitants in the Atlantic, officially corona-free. Same applies for Greenland.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on May 12, 2020, 04:27:02 AM
Quote from: Herman on May 11, 2020, 11:38:19 PM
1 it's bad thinking. If you send people (on threat of no-pay dismissal) back to work the workplace will become infested and people will die at a faster rate and wreck the economy, too.

2 don't watch Fox News.



I'm sorry about that. What you can do is don't watch Fox and shield yourself from that meanspiritedness.

We can not help but feel that if we had competent leadership, Republican or Democrat, we could have done a better job of dealing with this crises.

I have relatives who watch Fox 24/7.

I occasionally try to watch Fox to see the nonsense they are disseminating.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 05:32:00 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 03:37:56 AM
Are things still quite good down in New Zealand?

We've got the remote Faroe Islands, with 50,000 inhabitants in the Atlantic, officially corona-free. Same applies for Greenland.

We've been very lucky. No new cases for a bunch of days recently and on Thursday I'll be able to experience the simple pleasures of browsing secondhand books and classical lps again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 05:37:02 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 12, 2020, 05:32:00 AM
We've been very lucky. No new cases for a bunch of days recently and on Thursday I'll be able to experience the simple pleasures of browsing secondhand books and classical lps again.

Nice with some positive news - good to hear.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 12, 2020, 10:34:40 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 11, 2020, 05:30:14 PM
I think I'm actually insulted that you're continuing to post home remedies for minor illness on the coronavirus thread.

Please stop.
I have the suspicion that you grew up around a bunch of idiots who probably took bad advice which harmed their lives.

None of those suggestions are harmless. Worthless? Probably. But if he admits it's a guess and he's just trying to help, then it's not really a big deal IMO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on May 12, 2020, 10:37:39 AM
Quote from: greg on May 12, 2020, 10:34:40 AM
I have the suspicion that you grew up around a bunch of idiots who probably took bad advice which harmed their lives.

None of those suggestions are harmless. Worthless? Probably. But if he admits it's a guess and he's just trying to help, then it's not really a big deal IMO.
.

Thanks greg, you nail it my friend, have a nice day!!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: FelixSkodi on May 12, 2020, 10:41:05 AM
Quote from: pjme on May 12, 2020, 01:42:08 AM
"I agree with Simon that posting stuff about folksy remedies on a thread dedicated to corona is not terribly helpful."
+1

Echoing this sentiment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 10:46:27 AM
The German vaccine company Biontech, collaborating with Pfizer in USA, hopes to have millions of vaccines ready for use at the end of this year, and 100s of millions in 2021.
Their vaccines are already being tested on volunteers in Germany and the US. The tests are meant to investigate whether it's safe and effective, and to estimate the dosis. The results of the first tests should be ready in June or July, facilitating further development.

Source example
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_and_biontech_dose_first_participants_in_the_u_s_as_part_of_global_covid_19_mrna_vaccine_development_program
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 12, 2020, 10:49:55 AM
In the US, 5740 tax agencies are closed to the public, an increase of 676 from last week.  Intriguingly, even in Georgia and other southern states, tax agencies have not started opening to the public.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 12, 2020, 10:59:31 AM
Quote from: deprofundis on May 12, 2020, 10:37:39 AM
.

Thanks greg, you nail it my friend, have a nice day!!!
You too, dude.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 11:25:10 AM
Scientists here in Denmark say that they have sufficient knowledge to establish, with a large probability, through a scanning of a patient's heart, whether the patient will later develop severe sickness and need a ventilator, or not.
This is considered an important development in improving the treatment and using hospital resources in the best way.

(Source, but in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-05-12-seneste-nyt-om-coronavirus)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 12, 2020, 02:58:07 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 11:25:10 AM
Scientists here in Denmark say that they have sufficient knowledge to establish, with a large probability, through a scanning of a patient's heart, whether the patient will later develop severe sickness and need a ventilator, or not.
This is considered an important development in improving the treatment and using hospital resources in the best way.

(Source, but in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/2020-05-12-seneste-nyt-om-coronavirus)

Outstanding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 12, 2020, 03:25:18 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 12, 2020, 11:25:10 AM
Scientists here in Denmark say that they have sufficient knowledge to establish, with a large probability, through a scanning of a patient's heart, whether the patient will later develop severe sickness and need a ventilator, or not.
This is considered an important development in improving the treatment and using hospital resources in the best way.

It seems to be ultrasonic examination of the heart. I wonder what the specific criteria are. Maybe inflammatory heart disease or signs of pulmonary hypertension.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 12, 2020, 06:23:26 PM
Scientists worry that planned May 18 easing of some Mass. coronavirus rules could be too soon

Governor Charlie Baker's plan to reopen the economy in phases starting as soon as Monday may come as a relief to struggling business owners and nearly 1 million people left unemployed by the coronavirus crisis.

But many scientists caution that it may be too soon to broadly reopen Massachusetts, which has been among the hardest-hit states in the country, with 5,141 deaths so far. If the state moves too quickly, they warn, it risks a bleak calculus: a catastrophic second wave of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths — while further harming the economy.

They warned the state may not yet have the needed infrastructure to adequately test and trace the contacts of those infected to control those new outbreaks that will inevitably occur as people mingle more, especially endangering the sick and elderly.

"It still feels too early," said Erin Bromage, a biology professor who studies infectious diseases at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. "The fact that we're still seeing 1,000 to 1,500 new cases every day and we're in lockdown means quite a lot of community transmission is still happening, and the biology says you increase contacts, you increase spread, and you're off again."

By next week, the state may meet one metric for reopening proposed by the White House: declining virus cases for 14 days, the time it can take for symptoms to show up. The state's cases have largely decreased since May 1.

The scientists praised Baker's establishment of a statewide contact-tracing program, aimed at isolating those who interacted with anyone infected. But they said the state still needs to be testing more people every day.

Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said the state needs to be testing possibly several times more people than currently to adequately detect and stop new outbreaks.

"If you go too fast, you get more outbreaks, you get increases in cases, increases in deaths, and you set the economy back," Jha said. "It isn't about when a governor says things are reopened, it's really about how much confidence people feel."

Baker plans to unveil his full plan by May 18, when his stay-home advisory expires. On Monday, he released a three-page document that offered hints at his thinking. The plan lacked details on which businesses would open first, how long each phase would last, or what the triggers would be to move forward or back.

Baker has consulted with public health experts and business leaders. He said he would base his decisions on scientific data and revert to more restrictions if the virus takes off again uncontrolled.

"We have to ensure that when we take one step forward, we do not end up taking two steps back," Baker said.

The first wave will likely focus on industries that rely on few face-to-face interactions with customers. Baker also suggested that he won't open businesses based on whether they're essential, but rather whether they can meet safety standards.

The governor has moved cautiously toward lifting restrictions amid numbers that have only started to improve recently. About 3,100 people remained hospitalized with COVID-19 as of Sunday, a near 22 percent drop from the peak nearly three weeks earlier.

Other states in New England and across the country have slowly reopened businesses. In Maine, hair salons and barbershops were among the first to welcome back customers. In Rhode Island, some stores opened last weekend.

Massachusetts, however, has tallied far more deaths and hospitalizations than its neighbors. Its 79,332 confirmed cases are the fourth most in the country, behind only New York, New Jersey, and Illinois.

Dr. David Hamer, an infectious disease specialist at Boston Medical Center, said he was "concerned" that Baker's plan to start reopening was too early. He also questioned whether the state had sufficient testing or enough contact tracing.

"While there is evidence of decreasing numbers of new cases based on statewide testing and fewer hospitalizations, the decrease is very gradual," he said. "We need to proceed cautiously, given the potential risk."

But Dr. C. Robert Horsburgh Jr., a professor of epidemiology at Boston University, said he appreciated that the governor is wrestling with a quandary.

"I don't think anyone really knows what's best," Horsburgh said. "From a public health plan, I think the governor's plan is a bit risky, but if I were governor, I'd probably be doing the same thing."

He said he could understand opening some stores, in which patrons could be limited and maintain their distance. But other businesses, such as movie theaters, would be risky.

"You have to start somewhere," Horsburgh said.

A second wave of infections could be devastating, as the vast majority of Massachusetts residents remain susceptible to the virus.

In Chelsea, which was among the state's hardest-hit cities, 30 percent of those randomly tested had coronavirus antibodies, suggesting they previously had the disease. That's probably among the highest rates in Massachusetts.

The emphasis in Baker's preliminary plan of prohibiting those with COVID-19 symptoms from coming to work belies the fact that a significant portion of those infected don't experience symptoms at all or after they've been contagious for days, said Samuel Scarpino, an epidemiologist at Northeastern University.

He praised the governor's order requiring people to wear masks in public but added that contact tracing is crucial to addressing that issue. Until things are more under control, he said, he likely wouldn't feel comfortable meeting with friends or eating in restaurants.

"There's a lot of COVID-19 out there right now," Scarpino said. "I'm going to continue to physical distance until either the cases come way down or we're much further along with a pharmaceutical treatment or a vaccine."

Businesses should be required to file plans to explain how they're protecting their workers and customers, Scarpino said. In South Korea, one person may have caused the infections of 94 others at the call center where they all worked, a study showed.

Indoors, remaining 6 feet apart is not enough to guard against infection because droplets from someone's sneeze or cough could end up across a large room, Bromage of UMass said. At a restaurant in China, one customer without symptoms unwittingly infected nine others at their table and others nearby because of an air conditioner's flow, researchers believe.

In Florida and elsewhere, restaurants have been allowed to reopen with 25 percent of their fire capacity and some streets have been closed to traffic to allow for outdoor dining. That is something Massachusetts should consider, Bromage said.

Based on what scientists know about how the virus is transmitted through droplets, he said, it's important for people to wear masks and to reduce the amount of time they're indoors around others. They should also minimize the time they're near others in general, he said, avoid anyone singing or shouting, and ensure indoor spaces are well ventilated.

For that reason, hair salons may actually be relatively low-risk, especially for cuts and other quick services, Bromage said.

Dr. Edward Nardell, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School who spent years working at the state Department of Public Health, noted that the last two months of social distancing appears to have succeeded in ensuring that the state's hospitals weren't overwhelmed.

But he worries that opening too quickly could swing the state back to the exponential growth of the virus.

"If we go back to business as usual," he said, "we'll go back to transmission as usual."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 14, 2020, 01:26:09 PM
There was a story on NPR today about the impact of the virus on the Meat industry.  This one was about pigs.  One person was estimating that hog farmers will need to euthanize between 5 - 10 million pigs.  It's a combo of how the meat processing plants work, illnesses there and closures and the way the hog farming industry works (closely timed to markets, slaughter, and the maximum size that the hog can be to be commercially processed).  Meanwhile, meat prices are going up and there are people who need food.  Interesting reading/listening.  Are markets timed differently in places like Europe for instance?

https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/855662494/millions-of-pigs-will-be-euthanized-as-pandemic-cripples-meatpacking-plants

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 03:08:46 AM
The Trump thread has reverted to locked, so I'll ask this here:

Trump is just now considering a travel ban for Brasil...

How has Brasil with its many and exploding cases of the virus not already had a travel ban?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 21, 2020, 03:43:48 AM
because he likes Bolsonaro, and in several cases it looks like Trump doesn't close travel with countries in which he has hotels or golf courses. Remember, president is just his side job.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 03:50:43 AM
Okay...but why are his supporters praising him for stopping flights from China early if he's still allowing flights from Covid-ravaged Brazil?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on May 21, 2020, 04:19:18 AM
because they are ditto heads, applauding everything he does or doesn't, consequences be damned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 21, 2020, 05:35:38 AM
So, the U.S. is reopening. We have no vaccine, we have more experience treating the disease but no therapy which is an efficient cure, we have more testing capability but no viable strategy for contact tracing. Seems like exponential growth of cases and death will resume. Any reason to believe that this will not be the case?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 21, 2020, 06:37:19 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 21, 2020, 05:35:38 AM
So, the U.S. is reopening. We have no vaccine, we have more experience treating the disease but no therapy which is an efficient cure, we have more testing capability but no viable strategy for contact tracing. Seems like exponential growth of cases and death will resume. Any reason to believe that this will not be the case?



     I don't think exponential growth is likely. There will be more cases and some additional deaths. This will be superimposed on the downward trend we are seeing now in many places that have been hard hit.

     
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 03:08:46 AM
The Trump thread has reverted to locked, so I'll ask this here:

Trump is just now considering a travel ban for Brasil...

How has Brasil with its many and exploding cases of the virus not already had a travel ban?

     The TrumPutinists all over the world have taken the lead in the Rona Race. How they do that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 21, 2020, 08:23:40 AM
Denmark is basically opening up now, with the exception of the borders (where for example decisions regarding ordinary tourism will have to wait at least a week, and likely more), large gatherings, and a few more activities and institutions.

So far, statistics are good, but with pleasant weather and people generally loosening up a lot in their attitude such as city / cafe / restaurant life etc., it's a gamble that might result in a set-back. The opening is due to relative success, economical pressure, as well as a psychological and generally politically one. Apparently the Social Democrat government itself would have liked a more restricted opening. Experts are somewhat surprised that the slow opening up, that started about a month ago, hasn't influenced statistics negatively, since they continue to improve. I hope for the best, but am also worried.

From a population of 5.8 mio, we've had less than 560 fatalities, typically 0-10 daily now. And as regards ICU-units with ventilators at hospitals, only 2% are in use. An ongoing survey of the population, not complete yet, using blood samples, seems to suggest that only 1% has developed anti-bodies, and likely not many more have been infected. The generally low infection rate seems to comply with the results in other European countries; even Sweden, with its different, less restricted approach and big number of fatalities, seems to have only 5-10% infected so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 21, 2020, 03:38:49 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 21, 2020, 08:23:40 AM
Denmark is basically opening up now, with the exception of the borders (where for example decisions regarding ordinary tourism will have to wait at least a week, and likely more), large gatherings, and a few more activities and institutions.

So far, statistics are good, but with pleasant weather and people generally loosening up a lot in their attitude such as city / cafe / restaurant life etc., it's a gamble that might result in a set-back. The opening is due to relative success, economical pressure, as well as a psychological and generally politically one. Apparently the Social Democrat government itself would have liked a more restricted opening. Experts are somewhat surprised that the slow opening up, that started about a month ago, hasn't influenced statistics negatively, since they continue to improve. I hope for the best, but am also worried.

From a population of 5.8 mio, we've had less than 560 fatalities, typically 0-10 daily now. And as regards ICU-units with ventilators at hospitals, only 2% are in use. An ongoing survey of the population, not complete yet, using blood samples, seems to suggest that only 1% has developed anti-bodies, and likely not many more have been infected. The generally low infection rate seems to comply with the results in other European countries; even Sweden, with its different, less restricted approach and big number of fatalities, seems to have only 5-10% infected so far.
What is the mortality rate so far in terms of percentage?  It sounds like from what you've said that it's incredibly low.  Do you have the sense that people have been good about social-distancing?  Perhaps a healthier population (from what I've heard over the years) is a big factor?  What are things like in your town/city re openings?  In any event, I wish you all the best and thank you very much for the updates.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 21, 2020, 04:09:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 03:08:46 AM
The Trump thread has reverted to locked, so I'll ask this here:

Trump is just now considering a travel ban for Brasil...

How has Brasil with its many and exploding cases of the virus not already had a travel ban?

Brazil's leader adores Trump
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 04:27:24 PM
I know, but...what is the actual policy on travel coming in?

(can't believe I wrote "Brasil" twice)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 21, 2020, 05:13:44 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 04:27:24 PM
I know, but...what is the actual policy on travel coming in?

(can't believe I wrote "Brasil" twice)

Just your inner Brasiliero showing?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 21, 2020, 07:18:27 PM

Just 7.3% of Stockholm had Covid-19 antibodies by end of April, study shows (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/21/just-7-per-cent-of-stockholm-had-covid-19-antibodies-by-end-of-april-study-sweden-coronavirus)

"Just 7.3% of Stockholm's inhabitants had developed Covid-19 antibodies by the end of April, according to a study, raising concerns that the country's light-touch approach to the coronavirus may not be helping it build up broad immunity.

The research by Sweden's public health agency comes as Finland warned it would be risky to welcome Swedish tourists after figures suggested the country's death rate per capita was the highest in Europe over the seven days to 19 May.

Sweden's state epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, said the antibodies figure was "a bit lower than we'd thought", but added that it reflected the situation some weeks ago and he believed that by now "a little more than 20%" of the capital's population had probably contracted the virus.

However, the public health agency had previously said it expected about 25% to have been infected by 1 May and Tom Britton, a maths professor who helped develop its forecasting model, said the figure from the study was surprising.

"It means either the calculations made by the agency and myself are quite wrong, which is possible, but if that's the case it's surprising they are so wrong," he told the newspaper Dagens Nyheter. "Or more people have been infected than developed antibodies."

Björn Olsen, a professor of infectious medicine at Uppsala University, said herd immunity was a "dangerous and unrealistic" approach. "I think herd immunity is a long way off, if we ever reach it," he told Reuters after the release of the antibody findings."[...]


Why are Africa's coronavirus successes being overlooked?
Examples of innovation aren't getting the fanfare they would do if they emerged from Europe or the US (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/21/africa-coronavirus-successes-innovation-europe-us)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 22, 2020, 12:18:50 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 21, 2020, 03:38:49 PM
What is the mortality rate so far in terms of percentage?  It sounds like from what you've said that it's incredibly low.  Do you have the sense that people have been good about social-distancing?  Perhaps a healthier population (from what I've heard over the years) is a big factor?  What are things like in your town/city re openings?  In any event, I wish you all the best and thank you very much for the updates.

Best wishes,

PD

  Thank you! Yes, the statistics here are relatively OK, though for some comparable, nearby countries like Norway or Finland it is even better, whereas Sweden is bad. Sweden, having a less restrictive strategy and some serious problems in the sector for the elderly, has double the population, but is now at 4000 fatalities. This is sad, we often go to Sweden otherwise, also for vacation trips, but will abstain at least this year throughout.

I think the best worldwide statistics source (with obvious limitations implied in the very different testing percentages of the population in various countries etc.) is:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
+
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/denmark/

  Our government was quick at a lock-down (around March 12th), and people were generally good at living up to the recommendations. Police mainly had to work with some modest, outdoor spontaneous gatherings in fine weather. Masks are used by almost no people, but there is a lot of disinfection stands and guidance signs in shops etc. I read that in the US, you have people disinfecting the shopping carts etc. - sounds good, but we don't. I wonder whether the harsh sueing habits in the US and the UK, and the relatively low hourly salaries for getting more workers temporarily, may be factors for those precautions.

  But I am very grateful to the Social Democrats government's safety approach, in spite of the pressure for more opening up from market-orientated political parties and circles. In the end, these political agreements have been verified by all parties in parliament, however, showing the state of a ~national emergency, but this consensus is now coming under very strong pressure and probably won't continue. IMO, the lock-down has increased people's general attention to the virus a lot, many lives have been saved, and the economy will survive quite OK. They say that the government's covering of some of the expenses for companies and for employees' salaries will cost a good deal on the state budget, but the estimates vary a lot. There are also many speculations whether our economy will change for the better in the long run, say due to future-orientated investments in green energy, education, local production as opposed to foreign imports, etc.; for example, the government has just announced investing in two huge artificial 'energy islands' at sea, providing green energy.

  I also hope that these events will result in more appreciation, also financially, for people working in the practical, basic levels of society; they were the ones who actually kept society going, through their daily work.

  It's been a month now with a gradual loosening of the lock-down. But since a couple of days ago life is almost back to normal, just with a few recommendations in daily life and transport, and very few places & the borders closed down. People have however become more relaxed & it is quite frustrating, if you're having a lot of attention to that - say noticing, how runners don't show much attention to others on footpaths, and people sitting rather close at cafes, etc. But so far, statistics continue to be good; we'll see in around a week whether this tendency continues. I really hope so; if not, stricter measures should be promptly re-introduced, but it will be very difficult.

  Personally I have a paid leave until July, then I'll get my yearly vacation payment, equal to a month's salary, and a lot of the time there's also the possibility to supplement with some free-lance work. The main job will hopefully start in late August again. So economically this hasn't been a problem so far, unless the main municipality job will be permanently abolished later. Though living in the city, ordering groceries from the internet was felt safer, say around every 8-10 days, combined with very little shopping. Didn't use public transport since early March, getting around with a bicycle has been OK, also for family visits etc., including some 40 km away, which was only nice and healthy in good weather ... :). I know of no personal acquaintances that have become sick so far, 'Touch Wood'.

Maybe others here can tell a bit of stuff like this ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 22, 2020, 09:50:05 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 22, 2020, 12:18:50 AM

  I also hope that these events will result in more appreciation, also financially, for people working in the practical, basic levels of society; they were the ones who actually kept society going, through their daily work.

    In the US we don't do that. We appreciate job creators and love liberty for the deserving class that can shelter in place for like ever. Everyone else can sacrifice for the greater good.

    Things are not going well virus-wise for the Rona Troika.

     (https://i.imgur.com/Wki18lQ.png)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 22, 2020, 01:41:52 PM
Antimalarial drug touted by President Trump is linked to increased risk of death in coronavirus patients, study says (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/22/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-study/)

The study from The Lancet:

Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 22, 2020, 02:29:08 PM

UK: All people arriving in country from 8 June must quarantine for 14 days (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/22/uk-arrivals-8-june-quarantine-for-14-days-coronavirus)

this wasn't the case already?? then what is the point of starting now??
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 22, 2020, 02:32:21 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 22, 2020, 12:18:50 AM
  Thank you! Yes, the statistics here are relatively OK, though for some comparable, nearby countries like Norway or Finland it is even better, whereas Sweden is bad. Sweden, having a less restrictive strategy and some serious problems in the sector for the elderly, has double the population, but is now at 4000 fatalities. This is sad, we often go to Sweden otherwise, also for vacation trips, but will abstain at least this year throughout.

I think the best worldwide statistics source (with obvious limitations implied in the very different testing percentages of the population in various countries etc.) is:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
+
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/denmark/

  Our government was quick at a lock-down (around March 12th), and people were generally good at living up to the recommendations. Police mainly had to work with some modest, outdoor spontaneous gatherings in fine weather. Masks are used by almost no people, but there is a lot of disinfection stands and guidance signs in shops etc. I read that in the US, you have people disinfecting the shopping carts etc. - sounds good, but we don't. I wonder whether the harsh sueing habits in the US and the UK, and the relatively low hourly salaries for getting more workers temporarily, may be factors for those precautions.

  But I am very grateful to the Social Democrats government's safety approach, in spite of the pressure for more opening up from market-orientated political parties and circles. In the end, these political agreements have been verified by all parties in parliament, however, showing the state of a ~national emergency, but this consensus is now coming under very strong pressure and probably won't continue. IMO, the lock-down has increased people's general attention to the virus a lot, many lives have been saved, and the economy will survive quite OK. They say that the government's covering of some of the expenses for companies and for employees' salaries will cost a good deal on the state budget, but the estimates vary a lot. There are also many speculations whether our economy will change for the better in the long run, say due to future-orientated investments in green energy, education, local production as opposed to foreign imports, etc.; for example, the government has just announced investing in two huge artificial 'energy islands' at sea, providing green energy.

  I also hope that these events will result in more appreciation, also financially, for people working in the practical, basic levels of society; they were the ones who actually kept society going, through their daily work.

  It's been a month now with a gradual loosening of the lock-down. But since a couple of days ago life is almost back to normal, just with a few recommendations in daily life and transport, and very few places & the borders closed down. People have however become more relaxed & it is quite frustrating, if you're having a lot of attention to that - say noticing, how runners don't show much attention to others on footpaths, and people sitting rather close at cafes, etc. But so far, statistics continue to be good; we'll see in around a week whether this tendency continues. I really hope so; if not, stricter measures should be promptly re-introduced, but it will be very difficult.

  Personally I have a paid leave until July, then I'll get my yearly vacation payment, equal to a month's salary, and a lot of the time there's also the possibility to supplement with some free-lance work. The main job will hopefully start in late August again. So economically this hasn't been a problem so far, unless the main municipality job will be permanently abolished later. Though living in the city, ordering groceries from the internet was felt safer, say around every 8-10 days, combined with very little shopping. Didn't use public transport since early March, getting around with a bicycle has been OK, also for family visits etc., including some 40 km away, which was only nice and healthy in good weather ... :). I know of no personal acquaintances that have become sick so far, 'Touch Wood'.

Maybe others here can tell a bit of stuff like this ...

Nice to hear about what is going on in Denmark and yes, like you, I'd love to hear more about what is going on elsewhere.

I just read this story about a Bolivian orchestra getting stuck in Germany....quite interesting.  I do hope that they are able to go home soon.  And props to all of the people in Germany who have been helping them out; I love reading about people looking out for one another.   :)  https://www.bbc.com/news/the-reporters-52760380

Delays in farmers markets opening and extra precautions; hope to be able to go to one tomorrow (and, yes, I'll be wearing a mask).

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 22, 2020, 04:30:49 PM
If you feel the need to knock off 50 IQ points or so, here's an interview with "Costco Kevin", a mask denier or whatever they are called.  I could only take a few minutes myself.

https://www.youtube.com/v/1Quj3eWw26A
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 23, 2020, 07:12:44 AM
The Coming Post-COVID Anarchy

The Pandemic Bodes Ill for Both American and Chinese Power—and for the Global Order (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-05-06/coming-post-covid-anarchy?utm_medium=newsletters&utm_source=weekend_read&utm_content=20200523&utm_campaign=FA%20Weekend_052320_The%20Coming%20Post-COVID%20Anarchy&utm_term=FA%20Weekend%20Read-012320)

A Kevin Rudd scribbling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 23, 2020, 09:24:39 AM
Some generally positive news:

- The press and doctors here are very glad about it, calling it incredible news etc.: a series of studies of Remdesivir, though still not concluded, seem to suggest that the lives of no less than up to 80% - and not just 20% - of the patients can be saved, when Remdesivir is used at the right time during the treatment. The main study source is https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764?query=featured_home

Organizations are worried though, that the sole company behind the medicine, Gilead Sciences, tends to demand extremely high prices for their  medicine, which may hinder a general use of Remdesivir; the company has a patent running until 2031. There is currently a dialogue between health organizations and the company. But some are suggesting, that a special WTO paragraph may be used, allowing breaking a patent in the interest of the public good, during an emergency.

- ECMO machines are now said to be able to cure people who have been confined to ventilation machines; the problem is however that ECMOs are very costly.

- The Norwegian professor Terje Andersen is quite certain, that old blood from SARS-patients is able to stop Corona from developing further
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/wPGJp5/ny-medisin-kan-sette-koronaviruset-sjakkmatt-jan-terje-andersen

- also, there have been plenty of stories about the company Moderna's apparently promising vaccine
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/18/health/coronavirus-vaccine-moderna-early-results/index.html


Some further, Scandinavian sources, but googling will no doubt result in English-language sources as well:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/professorer-begejstrede-nyt-studie-foerste-gang-kan-vi-behandle-coronavirus?app_mode=true
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-studie-medicin-reducerer-coronadodsfald-med-80-procent
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-remdesivir-skal-ud-til-alle-resultaterne-er-utrolige-siger-professor
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-danske-patienter-advarer-mod-virksomhed-bag-succesmedicin-vi-kender-dem-desvaerre

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/respiratoren-kunne-ikke-redde-28-aarige-charlotte-men-saa-blev-hun-tilbudt-ecmo

https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/wPGJp5/ny-medisin-kan-sette-koronaviruset-sjakkmatt-jan-terje-andersen




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2020, 01:43:28 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 23, 2020, 09:24:39 AM
Some generally positive news:

- The press and doctors here are very glad about it, calling it incredible news etc.: a series of studies of Remdesivir, though still not concluded, seem to suggest that the lives of no less than up to 80% - and not just 20% - of the patients can be saved, when Remdesivir is used at the right time during the treatment. The main study source is https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764?query=featured_home

Organizations are worried though, that the sole company behind the medicine, Gilead Sciences, tends to demand extremely high prices for their  medicine, which may hinder a general use of Remdesivir; the company has a patent running until 2031. There is currently a dialogue between health organizations and the company. But some are suggesting, that a special WTO paragraph may be used, allowing breaking a patent in the interest of the public good, during an emergency.

- ECMO machines are now said to be able to cure people who have been confined to ventilation machines; the problem is however that ECMOs are very costly.

- The Norwegian professor Terje Andersen is quite certain, that old blood from SARS-patients is able to stop Corona from developing further
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/wPGJp5/ny-medisin-kan-sette-koronaviruset-sjakkmatt-jan-terje-andersen

- also, there have been plenty of stories about the company Moderna's apparently promising vaccine
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/18/health/coronavirus-vaccine-moderna-early-results/index.html


Some further, Scandinavian sources, but googling will no doubt result in English-language sources as well:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/professorer-begejstrede-nyt-studie-foerste-gang-kan-vi-behandle-coronavirus?app_mode=true
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-studie-medicin-reducerer-coronadodsfald-med-80-procent
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-remdesivir-skal-ud-til-alle-resultaterne-er-utrolige-siger-professor
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-05-23-danske-patienter-advarer-mod-virksomhed-bag-succesmedicin-vi-kender-dem-desvaerre

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/respiratoren-kunne-ikke-redde-28-aarige-charlotte-men-saa-blev-hun-tilbudt-ecmo

https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/wPGJp5/ny-medisin-kan-sette-koronaviruset-sjakkmatt-jan-terje-andersen
Nice to hear some good news!  I like the idea that if someone is charging really high prices for a drug and it's during a pandemic, that there might be a way to deal with it/them.   :)

Did just read this article which made me even more concerned (if possible) about what is happening to the Amazon.  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51300515

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on May 23, 2020, 08:19:37 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 23, 2020, 09:24:39 AM
Some generally positive news:

- The press and doctors here are very glad about it, calling it incredible news etc.: a series of studies of Remdesivir, though still not concluded, seem to suggest that the lives of no less than up to 80% - and not just 20% - of the patients can be saved, when Remdesivir is used at the right time during the treatment. The main study source is https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764?query=featured_home

I'm not sure where those numbers come from. The report linked indicates that mean hospitalization was reduced from 15 days to 11 days with Remdesivir, that 14 day mortality was reduced from 11.9% to 7.1%, that the probability of "severe adverse events" was reduced from 27.0% to 21.1%. This is a dramatic improvement of outcomes, but not a cure that will end the threat of the pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 24, 2020, 12:54:38 AM
Song for Dominic Cummings

https://www.youtube.com/v/0na2Y_74_mk&ebc=ANyPxKoxE8YFEgVp7qGKW7zgSLcEUI2fdLdhb0pl1GTlBx1g6yHC5xa2xwSekTdQqsKdu7DjpomeItRr38j42r8wf0FeLHo2Vw
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 24, 2020, 01:10:54 AM
"She's better off dead than alive / for fuck's sake she's sixty-five"...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on May 24, 2020, 01:50:30 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on May 24, 2020, 12:54:38 AM
Song for Dominic Cummings

I can't decide what is the most ignominious : his (repeated?) actions in breach of lock-down whilst setting the rules for all of us ...or the lame excuses by some of the cabinet members and the scientific advisor yesterday trying to find a suitable loophole in their own rules to cover the actions of this @%&!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on May 25, 2020, 05:46:30 AM
Here in Japan, the "state of emergencies" end. We had schools closed, as well as the big attractions and dept. stores, but no major enforced social distancing. Also, testing was shoddy by design; they made it really hard to get a declared infection. How did Japan avoid the worst with such conservative policies? No one is sure. Masks probably played a big role as everyone wore them early-on, many Japanese already wore them habitually before the virus. I don't know if I believe the other so called reasons. Some people say they were expert at contract tracing but that's hard to swallow as I think the medical bureaucracy here is as inept as every other bureaucracy in Japan. Or worse. Maybe the Asian virus is a weaker strain? No idea beyond that.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 25, 2020, 06:52:47 AM
Quote from: milk on May 25, 2020, 05:46:30 AM
Here in Japan, the "state of emergencies" end. We had schools closed, as well as the big attractions and dept. stores, but no major enforced social distancing. Also, testing was shoddy by design; they made it really hard to get a declared infection. How did Japan avoid the worst with such conservative policies? No one is sure. Masks probably played a big role as everyone wore them early-on, many Japanese already wore them habitually before the virus. I don't know if I believe the other so called reasons. Some people say they were expert at contract tracing but that's hard to swallow as I think the medical bureaucracy here is as inept as every other bureaucracy in Japan. Or worse. Maybe the Asian virus is a weaker strain? No idea beyond that.
Probably masks were the #1 most important thing. Would be nice if the Western world started to adopt this practice.

Other than that, low obesity rates for young people probably helps. And for old people, the tendency to live more away from big cities might help as well (just my observation, could be wrong about this, but there seems to be much less old people than you'd think in the big cities given the large amount of them country-wide). Maybe contrast that with Italy, where kids and grandparents intermingled a lot. Probably city kids knowing to not visit their parents in the suburbs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 25, 2020, 07:00:40 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on May 23, 2020, 08:19:37 PM
I'm not sure where those numbers come from. The report linked indicates that mean hospitalization was reduced from 15 days to 11 days with Remdesivir, that 14 day mortality was reduced from 11.9% to 7.1%, that the probability of "severe adverse events" was reduced from 27.0% to 21.1%. This is a dramatic improvement of outcomes, but not a cure that will end the threat of the pandemic.

The comments about up to 80% surviving are from some of the Danish doctors, who are participating in, or responsible for sections of, the current international survey work with Remdesivir. The trick is apparently to use the drug as soon as pneumonia sets in. But I can't see exactly where these 80% were found, except they must have been mentioned to or by some of those Danish people involved.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 26, 2020, 04:50:59 AM
With reopening comes the threat of a second wave of COVID-19, scientists warn

Epidemiologists say not to get too comfortable with the new normal: Another wave could also mean a second lockdown.

By Dasia Moore Globe Staff,Updated May 25, 2020, 4:38 p.m.

It could start in a half-empty restaurant or a Sunday morning church service, with a stray cough or a joyful hymn. Public health experts warn that without a vaccine or a heavy dose of caution, Massachusetts could easily be hit by a second wave of COVID-19 infections that rivals the first.

Such a wave could come in the fall or sooner, as restrictions ease and people return to traveling and spending time in crowded, closed-in spaces. And, experts say, if the state's tools for tracking the virus's spread are not up to snuff by then, a second wave could go undetected until it's too late[ ....]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 26, 2020, 07:18:31 AM

     Nationally deaths are plummeting and new cases are declining more slowly.

     (https://i.imgur.com/7Q3snZv.png)

     These states have seen considerable growth in new cases over the last week. The hardest hit states, California excepted, are responsible for the national slowing.

     Take Massachusetts, please:

     Cases

     (https://i.imgur.com/LGDhxV0.png)

     Deaths

     (https://i.imgur.com/iXZW0G4.png)
     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 26, 2020, 04:20:34 PM
Venezuela's Covid-19 death toll claims 'not credible', human rights group says (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/26/venezuela-coronavirus-death-toll-human-rights-watch)

"Venezuelan claims that fewer than a dozen people have died in the country from Covid-19 are nonsensical and likely dramatically underestimate the severity of the situation there, Human Rights Watch activists have claimed.

The South American country, which faced a historic economic depression even before the pandemic, reported its first Covid-19 cases on 13 March and has since confirmed 1,121 cases and 10 deaths.

Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela's authoritarian ruler, has imposed a strict lockdown and urged citizens to exercise "maximum discipline" to defeat the coronavirus.

But on Tuesday the New York-based human rights group questioned Venezuela's official figures as it released a new report on the health crisis facing the Caribbean nation.

"We believe the figures and the statistics that the Venezuelan government is providing – Maduro's statistics – are absolutely absurd and are not credible," said José Miguel Vivanco, the Americas director at Human Rights Watch.

Kathleen Page, a physician from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine involved in the report, said she had interviewed Venezuelan health professionals who had "indicated that even when they see confirmed cases of Covid-19 they are not being reported in the epidemiological reports".

The study is based on interviews with medical professionals in five Venezuelan states – Anzoátegui, Barinas, Bolívar, Lara and Zulia – and the capital, Caracas."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 27, 2020, 04:27:29 PM
Argentina cordons off virus-hit slum as critics decry 'ghettoes for poor people'
Drastic measures are being taken to contain the coronavirus in the Villa Azul area of Buenos Aires which has emerged as a hotspot (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/27/argentina-cordons-off-coronavirus-slum-ghettoes-for-poor-people)

"Security forces in Argentina have cordoned off one of the country's poorest slums, preventing inhabitants from entering or leaving the neighbourhood after a surge of coronavirus cases.

Police officers erected barriers at the entrance to Villa Azul on the outskirts of Buenos Aires on Monday after widespread testing was launched in poorer districts.

By Wednesday, 174 of 301 tests carried out in Villa Azul had come back positive, and officials expressed concern that if the 4,000 or so inhabitants of the neighbourhood were allowed to move freely, they could spread the virus to other areas nearby.

"This is worse than a nuclear explosion," said Sergio Berni, the security minister for
Buenos Aires, on Wednesday. "At least you can measure radioactivity in real time. With this [virus], it's 14 days late."

But the move was criticized by local activists and even members of Argentina's leftwing government. "It looks like we are creating ghettoes for poor people," said a junior minister for social development, Daniel Menéndez.

Daniel Gollán, health minister of Buenos Aires province, dismissed the charge. "We are working with the neighbourhood organisations, first to cut off the chain of contagion, and second to prevent people from leaving or entering because there is a much larger neighbourhood just next door."

So far, no deaths have been reported in Villa Azul, Gollán said.

Intensive testing is also being carried out in Villa Itatí, an equally destitute area nearby, which is home to about 15,000 people."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 27, 2020, 04:32:11 PM
Colombian designers prepare cardboard hospital beds that double as coffins
As coronavirus cases soar in Latin America, doctors say unorthodox idea may be necessary (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/27/colombia-coronavirus-cardboard-hospital-beds-coffins)

"A cardboard hospital bed that doubles as a coffin may seem morbid, but as Latin America emerges as the latest coronavirus hotspot, doctors have suggested it may be an innovation whose time has come.

With Covid-19 cases surging across the region, a team of Colombian designers came up with the idea as a grimly pragmatic solution for anticipated shortages of hospital beds and funerary caskets."[...]

(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/1e827a0edd8d6e788f3f15d15d4a7da72ce828c2/0_0_1280_960/master/1280.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=bdfb5889d4fc2d0af6aac3f701448f8a)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 28, 2020, 04:45:53 AM
Up to 80% of COVID-19 Infections Are Asymptomatic, a New Case Report Says (https://time.com/5842669/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 28, 2020, 07:42:03 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 28, 2020, 04:45:53 AM
Up to 80% of COVID-19 Infections Are Asymptomatic, a New Case Report Says

Actually this is fewer than some experts thought a month ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 28, 2020, 08:07:27 AM
The Spanish Flu Didn't Wreck the Global Economy

What Is Different About the Coronavirus Pandemic? (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-05-28/spanish-flu-didnt-wreck-global-economy?utm_medium=newsletters&utm_source=fatoday&utm_campaign=The%20Pandemic%20Does%20Not%20Spell%20the%20End%20for%20Cities&utm_content=20200528&utm_term=FA%20Today%20-%20112017)


Quote from: Walter ScheidelToday, the selective empathy of privilege amplifies existing inequalities. Thanks to Social Security and Medicare, Americans have long been in the habit of transferring wealth from young to old. But now they have taken the more radical step of destroying resources—by shrinking the economy—to safeguard the often few remaining years of those most at risk from COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. Technology renders this gambit least painful for the most protected, those who can hope to ride out the storm from the relative security of their home offices and higher-paying work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 28, 2020, 08:07:52 AM
A new statement from the Danish health authorities (Statens Seruminstitut) says, that as much as 500  of 524 Danish corona deaths happened with patients who had been hospitalized before because of chronic health problems.

Reference (in Danish):

https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/danskpolitik/ny-kortlaegning-faa-doede-udelukkende-af-corona/8140515

Google translate:

At the time of writing, Denmark has registered 565 'coronary deaths'.
But now, a new and comprehensive survey from the State Serum Institute shows that the corona itself is a very small percentage of this number.
A total of 24 people who, prior to the epidemic, did not suffer from a chronic disease, died of corona.
Most of them were over 80 years old.
Seven died under age 70
Extra Bladet has also asked the Serum Institute for a figure for how many already healthy people under 70 have died of corona so far.
The answer from the institute is seven.
However, this does not necessarily mean that the seven people have been completely healthy, says one of the researchers behind the study, a consultant at the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University Hospital Reimar W. Thomsen.
- We have only looked at those who have not previously been hospitalized for a chronic disorder. This does not mean that they cannot have a chronic illness. They may have had it, but at least it's not something that has been dealt with in hospital, he says.
No people without chronic illnesses under the age of 60 have died, the statement shows, and even people up to the age of 80 have had a high survival rate if they did not already suffer from one or more chronic diseases, the conclusion reads.
The mapping of coronary deaths in Denmark is the first of its kind. The Serum Institute has reviewed 9500 Danish coronary patients and the calculation was made at a time when 524 coronary deaths were recorded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 28, 2020, 09:04:12 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 28, 2020, 08:07:52 AM
A new statement from the Danish health authorities (Statens Seruminstitut) says, that as much as 500  of 524 Danish corona deaths happened with patients who had been hospitalized before because of chronic health problems.

Reference (in Danish):

https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/danskpolitik/ny-kortlaegning-faa-doede-udelukkende-af-corona/8140515

(...) (...)

No people without chronic illnesses under the age of 60 have died, the statement shows, and even people up to the age of 80 have had a high survival rate if they did not already suffer from one or more chronic diseases, the conclusion reads.
The mapping of coronary deaths in Denmark is the first of its kind. The Serum Institute has reviewed 9500 Danish coronary patients and the calculation was made at a time when 524 coronary deaths were recorded.

Interesting, thanks. I think we really need a better definition of those chronic diseases - were they all of a very serious character, or is a milder, chronic disease also counted, such as somewhat higher blood pressure, or mild asthma, or mild heart problems, or whatever? The article doesn't deal with that, but the information will eventually turn up.

..............................................

Sweden:
A critical story about the much-published experts Tegnell and Giesecke: Giesecke has been paid for his support to the Swedish herd immunity policy since March 23rd, and contrary to what he says, Giesecke does apparently not work as a consultant for the WHO.

DN is a major Swedish newspaper.
https://twitter.com/KeFuller/status/1266034965743120385
https://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/giesecke-har-miljonavtal-med-folkhalsomyndigheten-nu-dras-faktura-tillbaka/
https://blogg.vk.se/janhagglund/2020/05/27/johan-giesecke-far-betalt-da-han-forsvarar-folkhalsomyndighetens-agerande-detta-har-inte-framgatt-las-journalistens-avslojande/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 28, 2020, 11:19:39 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 28, 2020, 09:04:12 AM
Interesting, thanks. I think we really need a better definition of those chronic diseases - were they all of a very serious character, or is a milder, chronic disease also counted, such as somewhat higher blood pressure, or mild asthma, or mild heart problems, or whatever? The article doesn't deal with that, but the information will eventually turn up.

Mild cases, which the general practitioner can manage, are left out, as they don't need hospitalization.. So whether mild and well treated cases of asthma, COLD, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension aggravate the corona disease or not, we don't know, because the 24 patients who died but were characterized as being healthy, may have had mild diseases of that kind. The report doesn't consider whether this - if present - was of any importance. But I think we can say, that the risk of becoming seriously ill with corona is very small, if one only has mild comorbidity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 28, 2020, 12:26:13 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 28, 2020, 11:19:39 AM
Mild cases, which the general practitioner can manage, are left out, as they don't need hospitalization.. So mild and well treated cases of asthma, COLD, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension apparently don't aggravate the corona disease, we don't know, because the 24 patients, which were characterized as being healthy, may have had mild diseases of that kind. The report doesn't consider whether this - if present - was of any importance. But I think we can say, that the risk of becoming seriously ill with corona is very small, if one only has mild comorbidity.

Agreed, this seems to be the conclusion reached so far, plus previous hospitalization seems to be the factor, that is worsening one's prospects somewhat.

I assume that the passage describing this for the 7 otherwise healthy fatalities under the age of 70, should also be extended to all of the mentioned, allegedly healthy 24 cases, though this is perhaps a little unclear in the article's text.

But still: what diseases are meant; when, how, and for how long did hospitalization take place, etc. Plus, did the apparently healthy people have milder or fluctuating, similar diseases.

According to some sources, a lack of vitamines, especially Vitamine D, may also influence the severity of the disease,
https://theconversation.com/does-vitamin-d-protect-against-coronavirus-138001
but we hear a lot of theories these days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on May 28, 2020, 01:56:11 PM
     This map shows where new cases are rising and falling. Blue is falling, light orange is the same, dark orange is rising and red is Hotspotland.

     (https://i.imgur.com/XsG40Mq.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on June 04, 2020, 06:45:02 AM
The state of Texas is proceeding with progressive re-opening despite the fact that reported new infections are at a record level in the state. Oh dear, I guess it is inevitable. The rational, as I understood it, was "we will close down until testing and contract tracing can be made adequate." I guess the new rational is, "we have no intention of doing that, so we might as well reopen."

We will see what happens. Given the epidemiological parameters it is inevitable that basically everyone will get it eventually. It is just a matter of when.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 04, 2020, 06:56:11 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on June 04, 2020, 06:45:02 AM
The state of Texas is proceeding with progressive re-opening despite the fact that reported new infections are at a record level in the state. Oh dear, I guess it is inevitable. The rational, as I understood it, was "we will close down until testing and contract tracing can be made adequate." I guess the new rational is, "we have no intention of doing that, so we might as well reopen."

We will see what happens. Given the epidemiological parameters it is inevitable that basically everyone will get it eventually. It is just a matter of when.
Wow!  Will you be able to work from home?  Or will you have to work with/meet up with people very often?

PD

p.s.  Hope that wife and baby-on-board and the young one are all doing well?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on June 04, 2020, 07:12:34 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 04, 2020, 06:56:11 AM
Wow!  Will you be able to work from home?  Or will you have to work with/meet up with people very often?

PD

p.s.  Hope that wife and baby-on-board and the young one are all doing well?

Working from home for the immediate future. When I do return it will be a small office which will entail very limited additional contacts.

We are all surviving, the unfolding of the economic impacts of this is the most worrying aspect of it. Actually getting sick doesn't even cross my mind these days. We live in the Houston area and in the supermarket you mostly see people dutifully wearing their masks. No people brandishing assault rifles in order to defend themself with deadly force, if necessary, against libtards who would compel them to wear masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on June 04, 2020, 08:25:38 AM
Quote from: Baron Scarpia on June 04, 2020, 06:45:02 AM
The state of Texas is proceeding with progressive re-opening despite the fact that reported new infections are at a record level in the state. Oh dear, I guess it is inevitable. The rational, as I understood it, was "we will close down until testing and contract tracing can be made adequate." I guess the new rational is, "we have no intention of doing that, so we might as well reopen."

We will see what happens. Given the epidemiological parameters it is inevitable that basically everyone will get it eventually. It is just a matter of when.
My employer is wise, we are supposedly working from home until at least September. Makes sense for IT, productivity is not reduced at all.

The gyms have re-opened recently here in SA so I gotta work out again but be safe as possible somehow... also same with hair cut places...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 06, 2020, 02:55:56 AM
This channel is interesting

https://www.youtube.com/v/dUOFeVIrOPg
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on June 06, 2020, 06:25:34 AM
Pandemics Don't Bring People Together—Sometimes, They Pull Societies Apart (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-06-06/how-coronavirus-sows-civil-conflict?utm_medium=newsletters&utm_source=fatoday&utm_campaign=How%20the%20Coronavirus%20Sows%20Civil%20Conflict&utm_content=20200606&utm_term=FA%20Today%20-%20112017)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 07, 2020, 02:21:09 PM
Brazil stops releasing Covid-19 death toll and wipes data from official site
Government accused of totalitarianism and censorship after Bolsonaro orders end to publication of numbers (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/07/brazil-stops-releasing-covid-19-death-toll-and-wipes-data-from-official-site)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 08, 2020, 04:34:56 AM
Retail, dining, and many other businesses can begin to reopen in Massachusetts today

Indeed, I just got word suggesting that First Church in Boston is resuming services: the organist informs me that he selected a piece of mine for the prelude this Sunday, 14 June
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 08, 2020, 09:08:02 AM

     Shutdowns prevented 60 million coronavirus infections in the U.S., study finds (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/06/08/shutdowns-prevented-60-million-coronavirus-infections-us-study-finds/)

Shutdown orders prevented about 60 million novel coronavirus infections in the United States and 285 million in China, according to a research study published Monday that examined how stay-at-home orders and other restrictions limited the spread of the contagion.

A separate study from epidemiologists at Imperial College London estimated the shutdowns saved about 3.1 million lives in 11 European countries, including 500,000 in the United Kingdom, and dropped infection rates by an average of 82 percent, sufficient to drive the contagion well below epidemic levels.

The two reports, published simultaneously Monday in the journal Nature, used completely different methods to reach similar conclusions. They suggest that the aggressive and unprecedented shutdowns, which caused massive economic disruptions and job losses, were effective at halting the exponential spread of the novel coronavirus.


     

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 08, 2020, 12:22:16 PM
Yes, I read a summary elsewhere, and it's interesting, but I don't quite understand why such very high proportional numbers of infected persons hasn't occurred for real in close-to-no-lock-down Sweden then.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on June 08, 2020, 12:29:28 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 08, 2020, 04:34:56 AM
Retail, dining, and many other businesses can begin to reopen in Massachusetts today

Indeed, I just got word suggesting that First Church in Boston is resuming services: the organist informs me that he selected a piece of mine for the prelude this Sunday, 14 June

I'll take that as a good omen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on June 08, 2020, 03:33:49 PM
WHO says pandemic 'far from over' as daily cases hit record high (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-who/who-says-pandemic-far-from-over-as-daily-cases-hit-record-high-idUSKBN23F23E)


Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html)


It's official: The U.S. entered a recession in February (https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/it-s-official-u-s-entered-recession-february-n1227631)


US stocks surge, erasing 2020 losses (https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/investing/us-stocks-rally-nasdaq-record/index.html)


If you've seen one pandemic, you've seen one pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 09, 2020, 12:23:19 AM
Quote from: Todd on June 08, 2020, 03:33:49 PM


Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html)



Thanks for that one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on June 09, 2020, 12:44:22 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 08, 2020, 04:34:56 AM
Retail, dining, and many other businesses can begin to reopen in Massachusetts today

Indeed, I just got word suggesting that First Church in Boston is resuming services: the organist informs me that he selected a piece of mine for the prelude this Sunday, 14 June
How nice Karl. Will you be there to hear it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 09, 2020, 07:25:48 AM

     14 states and Puerto Rico hit highest seven-day average of new coronavirus infections (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/06/08/14-states-puerto-rico-hit-their-highest-seven-day-average-new-covid-19-infections-since-june/)

The increase of coronavirus cases in counties with fewer than 60,000 people is part of the trend of new infections surging across the rural United States. Health experts worry those areas, already short of resources before the pandemic, will struggle to track new cases with the infrastructure that remains.

Adding to the disparity in health-care support, residents in states such as Mississippi, Florida and South Carolina are living under only minor-to-moderate restrictions — even as their average daily infection rate is rising.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 09, 2020, 08:58:47 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on June 09, 2020, 12:44:22 AM
How nice Karl. Will you be there to hear it?

Not sure, as yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 09, 2020, 09:18:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 08, 2020, 12:22:16 PM
Yes, I read a summary elsewhere, and it's interesting, but I don't quite understand why such very high proportional numbers of infected persons hasn't occurred for real in close-to-no-lock-down Sweden then.

     I looked at the Imperial College study and particularly Sweden. It appears their measures worked a little less well than those applied in other countries. The thing to remember is the study is trying to measure what an outbreak would look like if nothing was done to halt the spread. I don't think that has been the case in any country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 09, 2020, 11:57:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on June 09, 2020, 12:44:22 AM
How nice Karl. Will you be there to hear it?

Well, in fact, similarly to the church I serve, they're streaming the service via Facebook.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 09, 2020, 07:03:21 PM
No, the lockdowns weren't an overreaction

"From the beginning of the pandemic, many conservatives have argued that the lockdowns were an overreaction to the novel coronavirus and that they are causing unnecessary economic pain. Recent studies, however, show that this argument is wrong.

Lockdowns and other measures to inhibit the spread of covid-19 likely saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the United States alone. We know this because of the way the virus spreads exponentially. Without lockdowns and other measures, every infected person would come into contact with a large number of uninfected people every day. A certain percentage of those people would contract the disease and would then further spread the disease to other uninfected people. Left unchecked, diseases such as covid-19 become like a raging wildfire, burning everything in their path."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on June 09, 2020, 07:08:38 PM
We haven't seen anything yet. People thought the first wave of this virus was bad wait until the second wave hits, which we're already starting to see in major populated cities once again thanks in no large part to the incompetence of our elected officials but also to the sheer ignorance of those who believed that COVID was only going to last a few months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 09, 2020, 07:22:05 PM
     Lockdowns are intended to be overreactions. That was made quite clear from the beginning of the outbreak. You do too much because the consequences of doing too little are unacceptable. Suppose we try to do only just enough and turn out to be wrong about what just enough is?

     So did we "overreact" too much? The studies in Nature appear to confirm that we didn't, though since that has been the guiding assumption since the virus first began to spread, the studies are about as unsurprising as could be.  Who knew epidemiologists knew epidemiology? I figured they did.

   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on June 09, 2020, 10:26:37 PM
If a person is not going to believe science about evolution and climate change they are not going to believe science about this virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 10, 2020, 08:59:04 AM
Quote from: drogulus on June 09, 2020, 07:22:05 PM
     Lockdowns are intended to be overreactions. That was made quite clear from the beginning of the outbreak. You do too much because the consequences of doing too little are unacceptable. Suppose we try to do only just enough and turn out to be wrong about what just enough is?

     So did we "overreact" too much? The studies in Nature appear to confirm that we didn't, though since that has been the guiding assumption since the virus first began to spread, the studies are about as unsurprising as could be.  Who knew epidemiologists knew epidemiology? I figured they did.

   

Quote from: arpeggio on June 09, 2020, 10:26:37 PM
If a person is not going to believe science about evolution and climate change they are not going to believe science about this virus.

Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 10, 2020, 01:43:24 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on June 09, 2020, 07:08:38 PMwhich we're already starting to see in major populated cities

Which cities?

I'm sure you're right, by the way, there will be a second wave. Hopefully we can keep it under control without shutting the economy down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 11, 2020, 04:55:23 AM
"Parts of the U.S. that had previously avoided being hit hard by the outbreak are now tallying record averages of new infections. Since the start of June, 14 states and Puerto Rico have recorded their highest-ever seven-day average of new coronavirus cases since the pandemic began, according to data tracked by The Washington Post."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 11, 2020, 04:58:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 11, 2020, 04:55:23 AM
"Parts of the U.S. that had previously avoided being hit hard by the outbreak are now tallying record averages of new infections. Since the start of June, 14 states and Puerto Rico have recorded their highest-ever seven-day average of new coronavirus cases since the pandemic began, according to data tracked by The Washington Post."

Did they avoid being hard hit by going into lockdown and then came out of it with no test and trace or social distancing practices?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 11, 2020, 05:03:17 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 11, 2020, 04:58:15 AM
Did they avoid being hard hit by going into lockdown and then came out of it with no test and trace or social distancing practices?

They are states which enacted no or minimal lockdown nor social distancing, and I suspect there is no test-&-trace in operation:


"Texas, Arkansas, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, Florida and Utah all set new highs in seven-day rolling case averages Wednesday, according to Post data.
Montana, Arkansas, Utah, Arizona and Texas have all seen coronavirus hospitalizations rise by at least 35 percent in the weeks since Memorial Day."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Ratliff on June 11, 2020, 05:29:02 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 11, 2020, 05:03:17 AM
They are states which enacted no or minimal lockdown nor social distancing, and I suspect there is no test-&-trace in operation:


"Texas, Arkansas, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, Florida and Utah all set new highs in seven-day rolling case averages Wednesday, according to Post data.
Montana, Arkansas, Utah, Arizona and Texas have all seen coronavirus hospitalizations rise by at least 35 percent in the weeks since Memorial Day."

You are not correct that Texas enacted no lockdown nor social distancing. Texas was a bit behind the curve, but there was a substantial lockdown (which is in the process of being lifted) and social distancing remains in effect. Moving from California to Texas, I did not note a substantial difference in the coronavirus response in April. Texas has been more zealous in lifting restrictions. (Of course, this applies to the specific areas I observed.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 11, 2020, 05:44:32 AM
Quote from: Ratliff on June 11, 2020, 05:29:02 AM
You are not correct that Texas enacted no lockdown nor social distancing. Texas was a bit behind the curve, but there was a substantial lockdown (which is in the process of being lifted) and social distancing remains in effect. Moving from California to Texas, I did not note a substantial difference in the coronavirus response in April. Texas has been more zealous in lifting restrictions. (Of course, this applies to the specific areas I observed.)

What about test and trace?

In Europe even the right is keen to put a lid on hospitalisations through test and trace. Here there's a right to health care at the point of need. I guess in America too they want to stop things going medieval.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 11, 2020, 06:48:54 AM
Quote from: Ratliff on June 11, 2020, 05:29:02 AM
You are not correct that Texas enacted no lockdown nor social distancing. Texas was a bit behind the curve, but there was a substantial lockdown (which is in the process of being lifted) and social distancing remains in effect. Moving from California to Texas, I did not note a substantial difference in the coronavirus response in April. Texas has been more zealous in lifting restrictions. (Of course, this applies to the specific areas I observed.)

Thanks for the emendations. And fare thee well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 12, 2020, 12:51:25 AM
Europe - the first wave seems to be over?

Though the definition of 'Europe' is incomplete and omits the Balkans, I think this is one good, very detailed source for current developments in most European regions, in relation to the various, either worrying or non-worried, media reports these days.

And yes, Sweden is a bit of an exception, the number of infected rising with about 1000 per day (1400 today actually, but the average number of daily fatalities going down somewhat). This is the background info that results in the hesitating of other countries to accept a flux of visitors from Sweden.

Though I'm tempted a bit to go abroad by my government's current suggestion of non-domestic vacations in only Germany, Norway or Iceland, I'll still play safe and have domestic holidays only. This applies to all the people I know, except from a young couple who are experienced hikers in the wilderness in Northern Scandinavia; they might consider Northern Sweden, but will be camping in a forest environment then.

There is now an increasing pressure from the EU towards the opening of most borders quickly this summer, but I think at least my government will withstand for a while.

Here in Denmark, we've had quite a few days now with no fatalities; but a general loosening in the general, social approach and some big, ultimately quite careless city demonstrations organized by Black Lives Matter etc. have increased worries that the numbers might start rising again, together with flux of foreign tourists from Germany and Norway expected from next Monday, the 15th of June. Testing is quite wide-spread now, the currently reached status is that about 10% of the population has been tested. There are between 15 and 80 new, registered infections every day in a population of 5.8 mio., and one can now go to the pharmacy and have a test, for about DKK 250-300, which is roughly 30-40 Euros. Local vaccine scientists have successfully applied a vaccine on mice and celebrated it with champagne, but the next step is testing it with people too.

This version of the map stems from
https://innovationorigins.com/is-europe-finally-free-of-corona-the-first-wave-seems-to-be-over/

Earlier versions and more details can be found here
https://innovationorigins.com/mapping-the-corona-pandemic-at-subnational-european-level/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 12, 2020, 01:24:54 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 12, 2020, 12:51:25 AM
Europe - the first wave seems to be over?

Though the definition of 'Europe' is incomplete and omits the Balkans, I think this is one good, very detailed source for current developments in most European regions, in relation to the various worrying or non-worried media reports these days.

Hmm, I am living in one of the green areas with very few cases. The risk is of course, that a possible second wave will hit harder (falling upon virgin ground).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 12, 2020, 10:05:10 AM

     Let me say something that might appear odd. OK, thanks. Some time ago I investigated nuclear strategy as warmongers do. The idea was to get the concepts and see how they cohere and correspond generally. For this purpose a little history was helpful.

     A concept in nuclear strategy is "degrading the offense". Because it's a credible war strategy it's a good deterrent strategy, which is the goal. The idea is that imperfect defenses can be too difficult to overcome, in effect breaking the offensive budget.

     Face masks don't even have to work especially well to be effective (https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/modeling-the-impact-of-face-masks-on-the-covid-19-pandemic/)

Mask use actually has two different functions. To a degree, it limits the ability of people who are infected to put infectious particles into the environment. And to a potentially different degree, it limits access to two of the primary routes by which those particles can reach new hosts: the mouth and nose. It's not a complete solution, as a person's eyes are still uncovered, and the degree of effectiveness will vary based on how many potentially infectious particles are filtered out. Still, even a crude mask is likely to capture many of the largest particles we produce, and those are the ones that will carry the most viruses.


     Masks degrade the virus offense when you wear them, and more when others do, too. The aggregate effect is to limit virus spread in a way that analysis of individual mask properties won't tell you.

     Aggregate effects are the ball game. Is that bad mask making you safe? At the micro level, no, at the macro level yes, because macro face masking means the virus offense never gets to you.

     You don't need nuclear strategy concepts to get this. When the question came up the right concept was there to use.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 12, 2020, 10:40:44 AM
Quote from: drogulus on June 12, 2020, 10:05:10 AM
     Let me say something that might appear odd. OK, thanks. Some time ago I investigated nuclear strategy as warmongers do. The idea was to get the concepts and see how they cohere and correspond generally. For this purpose a little history was helpful.

     A concept in nuclear strategy is "degrading the offense". Because it's a credible war strategy it's a good deterrent strategy, which is the goal. The idea is that imperfect defenses can be too difficult to overcome, in effect breaking the offensive budget.

     Face masks don't even have to work especially well to be effective (https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/modeling-the-impact-of-face-masks-on-the-covid-19-pandemic/)

Mask use actually has two different functions. To a degree, it limits the ability of people who are infected to put infectious particles into the environment. And to a potentially different degree, it limits access to two of the primary routes by which those particles can reach new hosts: the mouth and nose. It's not a complete solution, as a person's eyes are still uncovered, and the degree of effectiveness will vary based on how many potentially infectious particles are filtered out. Still, even a crude mask is likely to capture many of the largest particles we produce, and those are the ones that will carry the most viruses.


     Masks degrade the virus offense when you wear them, and more when others do, too. The aggregate effect is to limit virus spread in a way that analysis of individual mask properties won't tell you.

     Aggregate effects are the ball game. Is that bad mask making you safe? At the micro level, no, at the macro level yes, because macro face masking means the virus offense never gets to you.

     You don't need nuclear strategy concepts to get this. When the question came up the right concept was there to use.

On point.

And, of course, the mask that one cannot be bothered to wear is the least effective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 12, 2020, 02:54:37 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 12, 2020, 10:40:44 AM
On point.

And, of course, the mask that one cannot be bothered to wear is the least effective.

     Trump should hold his next rally outdoors and require everyone to wear masks. That way he can be safe from a viral first strike.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 13, 2020, 06:20:50 PM
As coronavirus infections surge nationwide, 21 states see increase in average daily new cases (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/06/13/coronavirus-live-updates-us/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 14, 2020, 05:19:35 AM
I see that The Bank of England has mooted the idea of a negative interest rate, and that they'll be printing some money.

Should I be relieved or worried?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 15, 2020, 04:15:10 AM
As maskless New Yorkers crowd outside bars, Cuomo threatens to shut the city back down
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 15, 2020, 04:50:02 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 09, 2020, 11:57:30 AM
Well, in fact, similarly to the church I serve, they're streaming the service via Facebook.
Hi Karl,

How was the service stream?  And were any 'regular' congregants allowed there for the actual service or only the minimal to perform the service/music, etc.?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 15, 2020, 04:58:52 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 12, 2020, 01:24:54 AM
Hmm, I am living in one of the green areas with very few cases. The risk is of course, that a possible second wave will hit harder (falling upon virgin ground).
I'm glad for you that you're in a green area and hope and pray that that continues to be the case premont!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 15, 2020, 05:15:28 AM
Quote from: Ratliff on June 11, 2020, 05:29:02 AM
You are not correct that Texas enacted no lockdown nor social distancing. Texas was a bit behind the curve, but there was a substantial lockdown (which is in the process of being lifted) and social distancing remains in effect. Moving from California to Texas, I did not note a substantial difference in the coronavirus response in April. Texas has been more zealous in lifting restrictions. (Of course, this applies to the specific areas I observed.)
Good to hear from you again Baron/Ratliff!  Hope that all is well in Texas and that we continue to hear from you more often again?  I'm behind in reading postings here due to general life busyness.....and trying to keep up with garden.

Stay safe!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 15, 2020, 06:05:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 15, 2020, 04:50:02 AM
Hi Karl,

How was the service stream?  And were any 'regular' congregants allowed there for the actual service or only the minimal to perform the service/music, etc.?

PD

Just the ministers and musicians.  The broadcast on the radio was good sound quality, although I did succeed in recording it.  Thanks for asking, P.D.!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 16, 2020, 08:46:10 AM
BREAKING: Texas reports another big jump in COVID-19 hospitalizations. New record of 2,518  in the hospital right now with lab confirmed COVID --up 192 from yesterday and up 1,007 since Memorial Day. That is a 67% increase since Memorial Day
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 16, 2020, 09:37:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 15, 2020, 04:58:52 AM
I'm glad for you that you're in a green area and hope and pray that that continues to be the case premont!

PD

I was a bit fast, because after about ten days without new cases in my area we have got (during the last two days) 25 corona positive patients at a care home and 3 positive school children at two different schools.  >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 16, 2020, 04:03:04 PM
BREAKING: Florida breaks another daily record number of reported COVID-19 cases for third day in a row with 2,581 new cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 16, 2020, 04:03:37 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 16, 2020, 09:37:18 AM
I was a bit fast, because after about ten days without new cases in my area we have got (during the last two days) 25 corona positive patients at a care home and 3 positive school children at two different schools.  >:(
Sorry to hear that news premonition.   :(  Just to clarify, what do you mean by a care home?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 16, 2020, 04:05:03 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 16, 2020, 04:03:04 PM
BREAKING: Florida breaks another daily record number of reported COVID-19 cases for third day in a row with 2,581 new cases.
Sorry to hear this news, but, sadly, not that surprised due to past activities by various people (crowds).   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 16, 2020, 04:06:00 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 16, 2020, 04:05:03 PM
Sorry to hear this news, but, sadly, not that surprised due to past activities by various people (crowds).   :(

PD

No surprise, indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on June 16, 2020, 05:03:11 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 16, 2020, 04:03:04 PM
BREAKING: Florida breaks another daily record number of reported COVID-19 cases for third day in a row with 2,581 new cases.

It looks like it's going to get really ugly in some (red) States, unfortunately.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 17, 2020, 02:42:43 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 16, 2020, 04:03:37 PM
what do you mean by a care home?

I thought this was an official term being used by several English posters here, meaning a home for elderly people who can't live in their own homes any longer, because they need rather much care from others- - nursing home if you want.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on June 17, 2020, 03:01:23 AM
My sister has been sending me all this conspiracy theory stuff about coronavirus. Dr Judy Mikovits is a crackpot who apparently has a video called "plandemic" that got a million hits.
Yikes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on June 17, 2020, 03:35:54 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 17, 2020, 02:42:43 AM
I thought this was an official term being used by several English posters here, meaning a home for elderly people who can't live in their own homes any longer, because they need rather much care from others- - nursing home if you want.
Yes, that is correct (at least in UK).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 17, 2020, 09:49:06 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on June 16, 2020, 05:03:11 PM
It looks like it's going to get really ugly in some (red) States, unfortunately.  :-\

     It's getting most ugly in these states:

     (https://i.imgur.com/XgyNISL.png)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 17, 2020, 01:05:06 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on June 17, 2020, 03:35:54 AM
Yes, that is correct (at least in UK).

Thank you for the verification.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 17, 2020, 01:40:12 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 17, 2020, 02:42:43 AM
I thought this was an official term being used by several English posters here, meaning a home for elderly people who can't live in their own homes any longer, because they need rather much care from others- - nursing home if you want.
Thanks!  I just wanted to make sure that I understood you.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on June 18, 2020, 01:07:29 AM
Dame Vera Lynn has passed away at 103. Her war-time hit "We'll Meet Again" was dusted off and played on the airwaves during the corona lock-down and gave comfort to many people particularly suffering from the feeling of isolation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on June 18, 2020, 01:08:55 AM
Quote from: Irons on June 18, 2020, 01:07:29 AM
Dame Vera Lynn has passed away at 103. Her war-time hit "We'll Meet Again" was dusted off and played on the airwaves during the corona lock-down and gave comfort to many people particularly suffering from the feeling of isolation.
Sad news indeed - but what a great life.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on June 18, 2020, 01:11:56 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on June 18, 2020, 01:08:55 AM
Sad news indeed - but what a great life.

Yes indeed, Jeffrey. It must have given her great satisfaction at the end of her life.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 18, 2020, 04:10:41 AM
Ah, that's a good excuse to drink a Vera and Philharmonic tonight

(https://www.liquor.com/thmb/0jwb6oCwHg-DdHQcWrxr6grRw6s=/720x720/filters:fill(auto,1)/__opt__aboutcom__coeus__resources__content_migration__liquor__2019__09__18090535__Gin-and-Tonic-720x720-recipe-c2e32c4cf53c4ed7a4de20af8e862a12.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 18, 2020, 03:14:39 PM
Quote from: Irons on June 18, 2020, 01:07:29 AM
Dame Vera Lynn has passed away at 103. Her war-time hit "We'll Meet Again" was dusted off and played on the airwaves during the corona lock-down and gave comfort to many people particularly suffering from the feeling of isolation.
Very sorry to hear that; I imagine that her career and recordings mattered to many.  I heard the news on the radio today.  So sorry for your loss.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on June 18, 2020, 10:22:33 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 18, 2020, 03:14:39 PM
Very sorry to hear that; I imagine that her career and recordings mattered to many.  I heard the news on the radio today.  So sorry for your loss.

Best wishes,

PD

There were some lovely tributes to her on the TV New last night and, of course, the Queen referenced 'We'll meet again' in her recent TV broadcast to the nation. She lived quite locally in Sussex and sounded like a most unaffected and genuine person, always helping out with local community events, charities (including her own charity) etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on June 19, 2020, 02:23:22 PM
New cases in the US are not falling. Today Texas, Florida, and Arizona each had more than 3,000 new cases. The country as a whole will reach a daily total of over 30,000 new cases for the first time since early May. I'm pretty sure this is not how it's supposed to be working.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 19, 2020, 03:47:50 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on June 19, 2020, 02:23:22 PM
New cases in the US are not falling. Today Texas, Florida, and Arizona each had more than 3,000 new cases. The country as a whole will reach a daily total of over 30,000 new cases for the first time since early May. I'm pretty sure this is not how it's supposed to be working.

No, but it may be impossible to do better, given the present administration and its toxic influence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on June 19, 2020, 03:57:37 PM
On today's TV newscast the journalist said flurries of new cases in the US had been observed all along I-95, IOW where vacationers stop to fuel, eat, sleep and shop.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 19, 2020, 04:12:45 PM
Quote from: André on June 19, 2020, 03:57:37 PM
On today's TV newscast the journalist said flurries of new cases in the US had been observed all along I-95, IOW where vacationers stop to fuel, eat, sleep and shop.

People are getting careless, imagining we're done. Junk information from the highest elected officials ain't helping.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on June 19, 2020, 06:08:29 PM
Quote from: André on June 19, 2020, 03:57:37 PM
On today's TV newscast the journalist said flurries of new cases in the US had been observed all along I-95, IOW where vacationers stop to fuel, eat, sleep and shop.

Much more likely to be truckers and business people avoiding airplanes than vacationers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 20, 2020, 06:33:15 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/ZxZ19vf/3-D04-DF14-F15-F-4-F0-C-BFDC-4-F9373-CEC1-B7.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 20, 2020, 09:18:03 AM
Quote from: JBS on June 19, 2020, 06:08:29 PM
Much more likely to be truckers and business people avoiding airplanes than vacationers.

     More likely antifa and BLM truckers are the cause.

     The rise in cases might be attributed to protests to a very small extent. If they were a major factor we'd know by now, and it's possible we'll soon have evidence that alters the prevailing judgment about outdoor spread. Where the protests occur and where the cases are rising rapidly don't match up so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 20, 2020, 01:35:36 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 20, 2020, 06:33:15 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/ZxZ19vf/3-D04-DF14-F15-F-4-F0-C-BFDC-4-F9373-CEC1-B7.png)

So if she ended up in a respirator this is her own choice. Wonder if she has given this problem sufficient attention.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 20, 2020, 02:07:49 PM
groan...and whose "choice" is it when she then passes the virus on to everyone she comes into contact with, including anyone elderly or already siclk?

6 Trump campaign members in Tulsa test positive for the coronavirus ahead of rally (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/6-trump-campaign-members-tulsa-test-positive-coronavirus-ahead-rally-n1231647)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 20, 2020, 03:05:17 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 20, 2020, 01:35:36 PM
So if she ended up in a respirator this is her own choice. Wonder if she has given this problem sufficient attention.

And she's buying a stairway to Tulsa . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 20, 2020, 03:05:42 PM
Daily coronavirus cases in the United States on Friday exceeded 30,000 for the first time in seven weeks, with states in the South and West continuing to report alarming spikes in new infections.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 20, 2020, 04:40:28 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/osC7nM8.png)

     That doesn't look good.

     (https://i.imgur.com/0tv9036.png)

     No one knows where antifa will strike next.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 21, 2020, 02:29:19 AM
Tests here show that about 1/5 of former corona patients will still be tested positive one month after their recovery, but that they don't infect other people at that stage.

Dextamethason is now being used in Danish hospitals, it is available, cheaper and apparently more effective than Remdesivir.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on June 21, 2020, 03:11:55 AM
Quote from: drogulus on June 20, 2020, 04:40:28 PM
     (https://i.imgur.com/osC7nM8.png)

     That doesn't look good.

Yeah, doesn't look good, but is totally expected considering how the crisis has been handled. In Finland (where we have a more or less competent government) it looks like this:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on June 21, 2020, 04:00:34 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on June 21, 2020, 03:11:55 AM
Yeah, doesn't look good, but is totally expected considering how the crisis has been handled. In Finland (where we have a more or less competent government) it looks like this:
Great points. But you also have to consider that the USA has become one of the most intellectually backward "major countries". It's not just the government (as malign and breathtakingly incompetent as it is); a large percentage of the population will simply refuse to comply with public health measures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 21, 2020, 04:11:12 AM
Quote from: T. D. on June 21, 2020, 04:00:34 AM
Great points. But you also have to consider that the USA has become one of the most intellectually backward "major countries". It's not just the government (as malign and breathtakingly incompetent as it is); a large percentage of the population will simply refuse to comply with public health measures.

Ayyup!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on June 21, 2020, 08:30:08 PM
One of the groups I am a member of is the City of Fairfax Band.

Our music director, Robert Pouliot, sent us the following:

"Finally, for those who may question our statements as overly cautious, we ask you to consider this: there is a case where a community chorus in Washington State decided it was time to start gathering to make music again, with disastrous results. Of the 60 members who met (out of 120), around 50 contracted the virus, three were hospitalized and two died (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6919e6.htm).  As best as can be determined, the spread was from one asymptomatic person at the rehearsal. Hand sanitizer was passed out as people arrived and the group avoided their normal hugging, handshaking and physical interaction. Understandably, we seek to avoid CFBA being noted as the source of the next "outbreak" of this kind."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 22, 2020, 01:18:56 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on June 21, 2020, 08:30:08 PM
One of the groups I am a member of is the City of Fairfax Band.

Our music director, Robert Pouliot, sent us the following:

"Finally, for those who may question our statements as overly cautious, we ask you to consider this: there is a case where a community chorus in Washington State decided it was time to start gathering to make music again, with disastrous results. Of the 60 members who met (out of 120), around 50 contracted the virus, three were hospitalized and two died (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6919e6.htm).  As best as can be determined, the spread was from one asymptomatic person at the rehearsal. Hand sanitizer was passed out as people arrived and the group avoided their normal hugging, handshaking and physical interaction. Understandably, we seek to avoid CFBA being noted as the source of the next "outbreak" of this kind."

I guess where there's a lot of deep huffing and puffing, breathing out from deep inside the lungs, i.e wind instruments, vocalists, then the risk of transmission is augmented. This is maybe one reason to avoid gyms, unfortunately (going to the gym is one of the things I miss most.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on June 23, 2020, 09:42:39 AM
E.U. May Exclude U.S. as It Reopens Borders, Citing Failures on Virus (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/world/europe/coronavirus-EU-American-travel-ban.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 23, 2020, 09:48:18 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 22, 2020, 01:18:56 AM
I guess where there's a lot of deep huffing and puffing, breathing out from deep inside the lungs, i.e wind instruments, vocalists, then the risk of transmission is augmented. This is maybe one reason to avoid gyms, unfortunately (going to the gym is one of the things I miss most.)

Singers and wind players are trained to project air.  A disease borne by breath droplets will spread throughout the room.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on June 23, 2020, 11:19:13 AM
I received a survey from the Orchestre métropolitain asking subscribers what kind of set up, setting and schedule we'd feel comfortable with come September, assuming that social distancing would still be required (it will).

I asked that they consider moving the wind and brass players (the huffing and puffing brigade) in the section behind and above the stage, leaving the stage platform to the percussion and strings. This way we'd get the full complement. Otherwise they would have to offer us a chamber orchestra version of themselves - with the inevitable program changes that would require.

(https://www.bonjourquebec.com/fiche/images/800x600/ab42d3ec-a8a8-4440-af8b-65467844802b/maison-symphonique-de-montreal-salle-de-spectacle.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on June 23, 2020, 12:37:01 PM
Funny stuff in a way...From Bloomberg:

EU May Exclude U.S. as Borders Open: NYT (1:49 p.m. NY)
European Union officials could exclude the U.S. in its plans to reopen borders on July 1 because it has failed to control the outbreak there, the New York Times reported, according to draft lists it said it viewed.

European nations are currently discussing two potential lists of acceptable visitors based on how countries are handling the pandemic, the Times reported. A final decision on reopening the borders is expected early next week, before the bloc reopens on July 1.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 23, 2020, 04:05:17 PM
Quote from: T. D. on June 23, 2020, 12:37:01 PM
Funny stuff in a way...From Bloomberg:

EU May Exclude U.S. as Borders Open: NYT (1:49 p.m. NY)
European Union officials could exclude the U.S. in its plans to reopen borders on July 1 because it has failed to control the outbreak there, the New York Times reported, according to draft lists it said it viewed.

European nations are currently discussing two potential lists of acceptable visitors based on how countries are handling the pandemic, the Times reported. A final decision on reopening the borders is expected early next week, before the bloc reopens on July 1.



     Build the TrumPutin Wall!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on June 23, 2020, 05:50:26 PM
Quote from: drogulus on June 23, 2020, 04:05:17 PM
     Build the TrumPutin Wall!

Don't overlook Bolsonaro, the other member of the troika.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 23, 2020, 08:00:25 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/ORuGxKR.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on June 23, 2020, 11:22:02 PM
Quote from: André on June 23, 2020, 11:19:13 AM
I received a survey from the Orchestre métropolitain asking subscribers what kind of set up, setting and schedule we'd feel comfortable with come September, assuming that social distancing would still be required (it will).

I asked that they consider moving the wind and brass players (the huffing and puffing brigade) in the section behind and above the stage, leaving the stage platform to the percussion and strings.

Beside upsetting the acoustics balance, what would that change/achieve?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on June 25, 2020, 04:29:03 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53167780

Projected US death toll up to "180,000 by October". A smaller 146,000 if 95% of population wear masks - yeah, sure, that'll happen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on June 25, 2020, 08:07:30 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-53174415/they-want-to-throw-god-s-wonderful-breathing-system-out

Before holding a vote to mandate the wearing of masks in public places to stop the spread of coronavirus, Palm Beach County commissioners were harangued by residents who accused them of obeying the devil, imposing a communist dictatorship and dishonouring the American flag.

Florida has just reported a daily record of 5,508 new coronavirus infections, bringing its total number of confirmed infections to 109,014, with 3,281 deaths.


American exceptionalism!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 25, 2020, 10:18:05 AM
I'm sorry, but this is just unusually stupid. Will prolong problems and doesn't exactly makes one wish to visit the UK within the nearer future.
Dorset beaches, the UK, today.
What a set-back.

https://twitter.com/Tobias_Ellwood/status/1276152218819989508

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 25, 2020, 11:32:41 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53185386

Coronavirus: Prof Chris Whitty warns public over gatherings in hot weather


'""Naturally people will want to enjoy the sun but we need to do so in a way that is safe for all," he said.'

The problem is this: it was entirely predictable that this would happen. Yet the city of Bournemouth never lifted a finger to encourage people to enjoy the sun " in a way that is safe for all."  I think that is totally irresponsible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 25, 2020, 11:46:46 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 25, 2020, 11:32:41 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53185386

Coronavirus: Prof Chris Whitty warns public over gatherings in hot weather


'""Naturally people will want to enjoy the sun but we need to do so in a way that is safe for all," he said.'

The problem is this: it was entirely predictable that this would happen. Yet the city of Bournemouth never lifted a finger to encourage people to enjoy the sun " in a way that is safe for all."  I think that is totally irresponsible.


     I don't think there will be much spread from a crowded beach environment. It looks worse than it probably is.

     Parties — Not Protests — Are Causing Spikes In Coronavirus (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/06/24/883017035/what-contact-tracing-may-tell-about-cluster-spread-of-the-coronavirus)

For the clusters that have popped up, Lautenbach says the state has been using contact tracing to learn more about how they're contributing to the spread of the virus. For instance, it found that 14 cases were associated with a party of 100 to 150 people in early June. Subsequently, 15 more cases were associated with the original 14.

"So that one event spread to 29 people and 31 related employers," Lautenbach says. "Our challenge is to continue to trace as it moves through families, as it moves through workplaces and as it moves through social events as well."

But protests just aren't spreading the disease in the same way, Lautenbach says.

"We're finding that the social events and gatherings, these parties where people aren't wearing masks, are our primary source of infection," Lautenbach says. "And then the secondary source of infection is workplace settings. There were 31 related employers just associated with that one party because of the number of people that brought that to their workplace. So for us, for a community our size, that's a pretty massive spread."

And much of that spread, Lautenbach says, is affecting young people.

"We have seen almost a near flip in the cases that we're experiencing," Lautenbach says. "So in April of this year, we were really struggling with long-term-care outbreaks. And so about 3 out of 4 people were over the age of 30 and really pretty heavily skewed to 60-plus. And by contrast, in June, we're seeing that now 2 out of 3 people that have contracted this disease are under 29."


     Massachusetts has also found protests are not big virus spreaders. I guess that means beach partying protesters will be safe as long as they wear masks.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on June 25, 2020, 12:20:48 PM
One difference that might be important is that at protests and parks and beaches, those in the crowd are likely to interact only with those they already know, and not move around randomly.

At parties, indoor or outdoor, this is less likely to be true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 25, 2020, 03:21:09 PM
Quote from: JBS on June 25, 2020, 12:20:48 PM
One difference that might be important is that at protests and parks and beaches, those in the crowd are likely to interact only with those they already know, and not move around randomly.

At parties, indoor or outdoor, this is less likely to be true.

     Also, if your cause is just, the virus will pass over.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on June 25, 2020, 07:13:47 PM
Quote from: T. D. on June 25, 2020, 08:07:30 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-53174415/they-want-to-throw-god-s-wonderful-breathing-system-out

Before holding a vote to mandate the wearing of masks in public places to stop the spread of coronavirus, Palm Beach County commissioners were harangued by residents who accused them of obeying the devil, imposing a communist dictatorship and dishonouring the American flag.

Florida has just reported a daily record of 5,508 new coronavirus infections, bringing its total number of confirmed infections to 109,014, with 3,281 deaths.


American exceptionalism!

For those who haven't seen it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1275912010555932672

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 26, 2020, 04:37:44 AM
I'll post these here:

http://henningmusick.blogspot.com/2020/06/past-present-and-not-quite-immediate.html (http://henningmusick.blogspot.com/2020/06/past-present-and-not-quite-immediate.html)

http://henningmusick.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-challenge-of-simplicity.html (http://henningmusick.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-challenge-of-simplicity.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 26, 2020, 04:40:39 AM
Separately:

On Facebook, she denounced a Starbucks worker who asked her to wear a mask. It backfired: He received over $28,000 in tips.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 26, 2020, 06:09:57 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 25, 2020, 10:18:05 AM
I'm sorry, but this is just unusually stupid. Will prolong problems and doesn't exactly makes one wish to visit the UK within the nearer future.
Dorset beaches, the UK, today.
What a set-back.

https://twitter.com/Tobias_Ellwood/status/1276152218819989508
Wow!  I was shocked when I saw that picture!  And saddened too.

Well, it's me and the birds in my garden (along with mosquitos who are horrible about social-distancing from me!  >:( ).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 26, 2020, 11:53:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 26, 2020, 06:09:57 AM
Wow!  I was shocked when I saw that picture!  And saddened too.

Well, it's me and the birds in my garden (along with mosquitos who are horrible about social-distancing from me!  >:( ).

PD

1) Truth be told, we were having some of the same problems in Copenhagen today, during the heatwave, albeit on a lesser scale.
There are popular beaches & swimming options in the city harbour. But beaches outside the city have plenty of space between people.

Unfortunately I can't really participate in that sort of city carelessness, but it must be pleasant when you can.

As a side remark, it's been demonstrated how photographers using a zoom lens often will make the density of people more accentuated, than it really is.
So one should study such photos a bit carefully.

2) Some good news:
a local study here shows that people using medicine against heightened blood pressure or heart problems aren't more at risk for being seriously ill with the virus.






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 26, 2020, 02:14:37 PM
Spanish scientists now saying they've apparently found clear traces of corona virus in one Barcelona sample from ... March 2019.
But the find needs further verification.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science/coronavirus-traces-found-in-march-2019-sewage-sample-spanish-study-shows-idUSKBN23X2HQ
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 26, 2020, 03:34:06 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 26, 2020, 11:53:07 AM
1) Truth be told, we were having some of the same problems in Copenhagen today, during the heatwave, albeit on a lesser scale.
There are popular beaches & swimming options in the city harbour. But beaches outside the city have plenty of space between people.

Unfortunately I can't really participate in that sort of city carelessness, but it must be pleasant when you can.

As a side remark, it's been demonstrated how photographers using a zoom lens often will make the density of people more accentuated, than it really is.
So one should study such photos a bit carefully.

2) Some good news:
a local study here shows that people using medicine against heightened blood pressure or heart problems aren't more at risk for being seriously ill with the virus.
Ah, well, I hope that the rate doesn't spike in Denmark.

I've wondered about some photos...thinking more about the angle but that's good to know about zoom lenses.  I'll have to ask others more about that on the photos thread...thanks!  And good news re No. 2. :-)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 27, 2020, 01:07:04 AM
Disconcerting news about the situation in the USA:

Coronavirus: US has 'serious problem', says Fauci (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53200834) (BBC)

My sympathies go out to our members from the US....
Although it hasn't been a picnic here in Europe either.
But at least the situation is under control - for now - and there has been a gradual return to some form of normality.
With the possible exception of the UK, which locked down too late and is now unlocking too early.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on June 27, 2020, 01:27:41 AM
Outdoors the contagion probability seems far smaller than indoors. With the old samples, it could be fragments of similar viruses, or not. Continental/central Europe seems to be doing not too bad. Switzerland, Austria, Czechia are allowing most things, including tourism, Germany has had a little setback because of the embarrassing situation in slaughterhouses (and worse, the living conditions of their often Southeastern European workers) but apart from this it seems quite under control.
Not sure about Africa and Southern Asia but the main viral problem zone now seems the Americas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 27, 2020, 12:43:13 PM
Quote from: Jo498 on June 27, 2020, 01:27:41 AM
Outdoors the contagion probability seems far smaller than indoors. With the old samples, it could be fragments of similar viruses, or not. Continental/central Europe seems to be doing not too bad. Switzerland, Austria, Czechia are allowing most things, including tourism, Germany has had a little setback because of the embarrassing situation in slaughterhouses (and worse, the living conditions of their often Southeastern European workers) but apart from this it seems quite under control.


     I just watched an episode of Tatort that showed the conditions of slaughterhouse workers housing (Bulgarians).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 28, 2020, 07:48:56 AM

     How the Virus Won (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-spread.html)

     This adds detail to what has been reported widely. We "shallowed" out the CDC, it bungled the first tests and there was no follow up. There has been no national testing and contact tracing strategy. We aren't even playing catch up.

     It's not just the Trumpist moronathon that afflicts the country. Bill De Blasio has to answer for his delayed response. Allowing local government to fall to the stupidest level it's capable of in a national emergency has produced predictable results.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 29, 2020, 02:32:39 PM
Caught a bit of a news story today re US at least (need to look into it longer), but it has to do with somehow or another using wastewater to detect the virus and that it could be used to detecting a second wave of the virus.

Sorry, I need to work on dinner, but I'm sure that you can find various stories.

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 30, 2020, 05:29:58 PM
US buys up world stock of key Covid-19 drug remdesivir (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/30/us-buys-up-world-stock-of-key-covid-19-drug)

"The US has bought up virtually all the stocks for the next three months of one of the two drugs proven to work against Covid-19, leaving none for the UK, Europe or most of the rest of the world.

Experts and campaigners are alarmed both by the US unilateral action on remdesivir and the wider implications, for instance in the event of a vaccine becoming available. The Trump administration has already shown that it is prepared to outbid and outmanoeuvre all other countries to secure the medical supplies it needs for the US.

"They've got access to most of the drug supply [of remdesivir], so there's nothing for Europe," said Dr Andrew Hill, senior visiting research fellow at Liverpool University.

Remdesivir, the first drug approved by licensing authorities in the US to treat Covid-19, is made by Gilead and has been shown to help people recover faster from the disease. The first 140,000 doses, supplied to drug trials around the world, have been used up. The Trump administration has now bought more than 500,000 doses, which is all of Gilead's production for July and 90% of August and September.

"President Trump has struck an amazing deal to ensure Americans have access to the first authorised therapeutic for Covid-19," said the US health and human services secretary, Alex Azar. "To the extent possible, we want to ensure that any American patient who needs remdesivir can get it. The Trump administration is doing everything in our power to learn more about life-saving therapeutics for Covid-19 and secure access to these options for the American people."

The drug, which was invented for Ebola but failed to work, is under patent to Gilead, which means no other company in wealthy countries can make it. The cost is around $3,200 per treatment of six doses, according to the US government statement.

The deal was announced as it became clear that the pandemic in the US is spiralling out of control. Anthony Fauci, the country's leading public health expert and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told the Senate the US was sliding backwards."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 30, 2020, 09:39:55 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 21, 2020, 02:29:19 AM
(...)

Dextamethason is now being used in Danish hospitals, it is available, cheaper and apparently more effective than Remdesivir.

Hydrocortisone is also promising, cf. results from the UK, reducing fatalities with at least 1/3 among the very ill, and it will now be introduced at hospitals here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 01, 2020, 02:37:50 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on June 30, 2020, 05:29:58 PM
US buys up world stock of key Covid-19 drug remdesivir (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/30/us-buys-up-world-stock-of-key-covid-19-drug)

America first.....

Foolish... because soon the tables might be turned: the most promising vaccine projects are European.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 01, 2020, 04:05:00 AM
Quote from: Que on July 01, 2020, 02:37:50 AM
America first.....

Foolish... because soon the tables might be turned: the most promising vaccine projects are European.

Another possibility is that Kushner and other Orange Swindler intimates have loaded up on Gilead shares and the POTUS is trying to kite the stock price.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 01, 2020, 12:33:40 PM
Quote from: Que on July 01, 2020, 02:37:50 AM
America first.....

Foolish... because soon the tables might be turned: the most promising vaccine projects are European.

Q

Indeed, wickedly foolish.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 01, 2020, 12:34:13 PM
California and Pennsylvania to impose new restrictions amid spike in coronavirus cases
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 01, 2020, 01:13:56 PM
Sad to see it Karl.  I know a woman who was just finishing chemo in Arizona; hasn't been out to shop in ages...too scared to do so and things are getting worse there too.   :

PD(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 02, 2020, 08:55:12 AM
Quote from: Dowder on June 30, 2020, 06:23:37 PM
Covid-19 cases exploding in the Golden State: 

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/505350-california-breaks-daily-record-with-more-than-8000-new-covid-19-cases (https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/505350-california-breaks-daily-record-with-more-than-8000-new-covid-19-cases)

So in this solidly Dem blue state are you blaming Newsom Trump for the outbreak?  ::)

    Of course he should be blamed for the decisions he's made, and I apply that to all governors and other local officials. The distinction to be made is whether the mistakes are driven by ideology, or by generic incompetence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 02, 2020, 01:16:33 PM
Wonder how may lives would have been saved if he had had the sense to do so sooner....

Texas governor issues mandatory mask policy for counties with 20 or more coronavirus cases
Texas governor issues statewide mask requirement, limitations on gatherings
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 02, 2020, 04:11:20 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/MwJALYi.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 02, 2020, 04:31:31 PM
People in Alabama are throwing COVID-19 parties with a payout when one gets infected: official

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/people-in-alabama-are-throwing-covid-19-parties-with-a-payout-when-one-gets-infected-official-1.5007903
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 02, 2020, 05:52:18 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 02, 2020, 04:31:31 PM
People in Alabama are throwing COVID-19 parties with a payout when one gets infected: official

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/people-in-alabama-are-throwing-covid-19-parties-with-a-payout-when-one-gets-infected-official-1.5007903

That seems to be one of those stories that gets publicity but is not actually true.
When you dig through the stories, it's officials saying they have been told such parties happen but no case in which it actually happened.

There probably were parties with at least one person attending despite being infected, but no known case of anyone voluntarily getting infected.

I would bet the origin of this is some very dark humor by a bored college kid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on July 02, 2020, 06:13:01 PM
We've had 22 community outbreaks in the last 7 days here in San Diego County.  Hospitals seem to be holding up so far.

https://sdcounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/30b5e0fa2a5f4404b1219d8cd16b2583
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 02, 2020, 06:51:03 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 02, 2020, 06:13:01 PM
We've had 22 community outbreaks in the last 7 days here in San Diego County.  Hospitals seem to be holding up so far.

https://sdcounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/30b5e0fa2a5f4404b1219d8cd16b2583

Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on July 02, 2020, 06:57:21 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 02, 2020, 06:51:03 PM
Good luck!

Well, I've been self-isolating since early March, so I'm fine, if a little stir-crazy.  But I feel for anyone who has to choose between paying rent and getting sick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 02, 2020, 07:34:03 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 02, 2020, 06:57:21 PM
Well, I've been self-isolating since early March, so I'm fine, if a little stir-crazy.  But I feel for anyone who has to choose between paying rent and getting sick.

Yes, I do, too. I've been in self-quarantine since late March and it's quite disheartening to know that some people have to continue to work because they have no other choice. People who work in the hospitals, pharmacies, grocery stores and restaurants my hat goes off to you. These are the people who we should thanking everyday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 02, 2020, 11:30:14 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 02, 2020, 07:34:03 PM
Yes, I do, too. I've been in self-quarantine since late March and it's quite disheartening to know that some people have to continue to work because they have no other choice. People who work in the hospitals, pharmacies, grocery stores and restaurants my hat goes off to you. These are the people who we should thanking everyday.

Governement support to continue paying everybody to stay home in order to get the epidemic under control, has proven to be the more succesfull strategy. And it limits the economic damage (to a certain extent) as well.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 03, 2020, 05:39:37 AM
I live in a rural area where there have been very few cases. The only concrete local case I heard of was a 70+ year old gentleman who was diagnosed in early May. He was a dedicated anti-masker. He'd been cooking part-time at 2 restaurants while not masked up; both had to close for 2 weeks after his diagnosis and other employees had to self-quarantine (though I'm not certain all complied). Heard that he passed away about a week ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 03, 2020, 01:00:47 PM
In the Uk there's a system of home testing, if you have symptoms you can request a test online to be delivered to your house, you send it back and get the results. If positive, they are supposed to ask for contacts and ask them to isolate.

On Wednesday I got an email asking me to volunteer to do the test. I said yes and the test arrived this morning, 36 hours after requesting it. I don't have symptoms.

The process of requesting it online is easy, they ask for your NI and NHS number but you can just say you don't know. They check your identity in some way, but they reassure you that it's not a credit check. It takes a few minutes and is no harder than filling in a return form for amazon, for example. They send you a couple of confirmation emails telling you to expect a package, with help line numbers and a brief summary of what you should do when you get it.

The test pack was waiting for me on my doorstep when I got up this morning, with the milk.

There is an instruction booklet. It is in pretty plain English. Only English, and I don't recall being asked about languages when I applied. There are a lot of instructions to follow. It is a bit on the same level as making some flatpack furniture. What I mean is, it's perfectly possible to bodge it, you may think the shelves are fine, but they haven't been made as they should and there are some bits you haven't used, worryingly. With bookshelves it doesn't matter, with this  . . . it matters a bit more maybe.

Performing the test itself was uncomfortable for me, but not a major problem. If you panic when the dentist wants to put something in your mouth, you'll find it a very challenging hurdle. But for me, that side of it was fine.

When you've done the test, you still have a lot to do. The swab has to be labelled correctly -- so you have to find the label. It has to go into a container, that container then goes into another container, the second container goes into a third, the whole sealed.  and then you have to construct by origami a fourth container to put the other three into -- which in turn to be sealed in the correct way. Worryingly, the origami  box didn't really fit the sample in all those containers, I had to bang and sit on it to make it close  -- I wonder what I did wrong.

You then have to post it at a designated priority post box, which you find through a Royal Mail website. When you log in, it asks to use your present location, but in my case didn't function correctly (it basically just seemed to construct a postcode at random) so the post boxes it came up with were hopeless. No probs. I have a helpline number -- 131.

131 answered the phone very quickly and a cheerful lady told me some nearby priority post boxes (all very convenient) and then I was just saying goodbye when she said  . . .  and this is the killer "have you registered your test yet?"

Now, I have many degrees including a doctorate, I have done some mildly responsible jobs without failing, my kids are pretty happy adults, so I kind of see myself as an at least averagely capable person. But if she hadn't asked me I would have forgotten to register and so I would not have received my test results and probably, if positive, my contacts would not have been traced.

But it's all OK because she'll do it for me (normally you're supposed to do it online.) What a palava!  She had to type a long code which was my order code (big panic finding the email with it on), a long code which was my test sample code, and a long code which was the postage code. All very long, all potential typo traps.

That process of registration seems to me a major weakness in the system so far. Why it couldn't have all been done automatically I do not know.

Anyway she said 72 hours maximum to get the test results. Boris is promising to turn these things round in 24.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 03, 2020, 03:28:13 PM
Seems like your DIY test was as easy as mounting an Ikea piece of furniture  :D.

I got tested in May at a local health service centre and in June at a mobile unit close to my home. Negative both times. The second time around was very uncomfortable, close to being downright painful. I suppose it depends on the state of one's mucous membranes at the moment of the test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 03, 2020, 04:00:40 PM
Trump has solved the immigration problem with Mexico.

Have the country infected by a virus and Mexico is then forced to close the border with the United States.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 03, 2020, 04:19:50 PM
A rather poorly argued and occasionally insulting article from Politico, who usually do much better:

What Sweden can teach us about coronavirus (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/07/03/what-sweden-can-teach-us-about-coronavirus-348462)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 03, 2020, 04:52:31 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 03, 2020, 04:19:50 PM
A rather poorly argued and occasionally insulting article from Politico, who usually do much better:

What Sweden can teach us about coronavirus (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/07/03/what-sweden-can-teach-us-about-coronavirus-348462)

I didn't find the article that bad, but it's really far from new. I've already read more than one analysis of the Swedish approach.
As an American it's completely irrelevant, because all that could never happen here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 03, 2020, 05:08:04 PM
I found the parallel they drew between their wartime commitment and their corona response spurious. I was insulted by their subtle suggestion that the statistics for rest home deaths were less important, and by libertarian nonsense like this: "Treating citizens as children lacking the judgment to make wise decisions is not a sustainable approach. Addressing a prolonged crisis, or one that comes in repeated waves, will require citizens to be active and responsible participants in their security — not mere recipients of government instructions.", which I think is more the author's projection rather than something the Swedes themselves might say, especially as two paragraphs later we get " 93 percent of the population say they are following social-distancing recommendations", ie government instructions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 03, 2020, 05:16:20 PM
Yes, the wartime parallel seems dubious and forced. That's (and the preachy tone) what mainly differentiates the article from the previous Sweden analysis I read (probably Bloomberg and/or BBC, I forget sources), which more directly addressed the high mortality in care homes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 03, 2020, 05:55:43 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 02, 2020, 06:57:21 PM
Well, I've been self-isolating since early March, so I'm fine, if a little stir-crazy.  But I feel for anyone who has to choose between paying rent and getting sick.

Truly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 03, 2020, 10:01:59 PM
Also, you don't compare Sweden say with Portugal for a different approach for strategy and death tolls, when the neighbouring countries of Norway, Finland and Denmark are right at hand. The sector for the elderly, which should be illustrative of a community spirit, has worked very bad in Sweden, with a lot of fatalities; critical ill, elderly patients have been denied treatment - and schools were often forbidden to tell parents of virus in the classes, whereas they were allowed to tell about ordinary flus etc. And the amount of testing in Sweden has been low too. I agree that it's a bad article with only incomplete and very selective information.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 03:45:47 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 03, 2020, 05:08:04 PM
libertarian nonsense like this: "Treating citizens as children lacking the judgment to make wise decisions is not a sustainable approach. Addressing a prolonged crisis, or one that comes in repeated waves, will require citizens to be active and responsible participants in their security — not mere recipients of government instructions.", which I think is more the author's projection rather than something the Swedes themselves might say, especially as two paragraphs later we get " 93 percent of the population say they are following social-distancing recommendations", ie government instructions.

Actually, what we get in full is this:

Even though the government has only issued behavioral guidelines and individuals don't face fines for non-compliance, 93 percent of the population say they are following social-distancing recommendations.

which aligns perfectly with

Treating citizens as children lacking the judgment to make wise decisions is not a sustainable approach. Addressing a prolonged crisis, or one that comes in repeated waves, will require citizens to be active and responsible participants in their security — not mere recipients of government instructions

The only nonsense here is your qualifing this as "libertarian nonsense" when in fact it's plain common sense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 03:49:33 AM
Common sense? No. That's not self evident. You'll need to convince me of that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 04:25:31 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 03:49:33 AM
Common sense? No. That's not self evident. You'll need to convince me of that.

Is it really not self-evident for you that citizens must be active and responsible participants in their security — not mere recipients of government instructions? Do you really need to be convinced of that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 06:44:35 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 04:25:31 AM
Is it really not self-evident for you that citizens must be active and responsible participants in their security — not mere recipients of government instructions? Do you really need to be convinced of that?


     An active citizenry chooses an active government. It's the liberty lovers who think citizens who want government to be active are children.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 07:02:08 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 06:44:35 AM
     An active citizenry chooses an active government. It's the liberty lovers who think citizens who want government to be active are children.

Both statements are factually incorrect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 04, 2020, 07:38:40 AM
The most active form of government is totalitarian government.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 07:55:02 AM
     
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 07:02:08 AM
Both statements are factually incorrect.

     No, they are accurate. Democratic governments are active because they respond to the citizens, and do so better than dictatorships. We know how they work, and most of us live in countries that operate that way, the "least worst" way.

     The "libertator" way is a fantasy. People will want governments to solve problems. They do, and won't stop.

     Dictatorships privilege rule by powerful persons over rule by law and institutions that enforce it. They are "shallow" states.

Quote from: JBS on July 04, 2020, 07:38:40 AM
The most active form of government is totalitarian government.

     Defend your democratic rights. That's how you get the kind of liberty worth having.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 04, 2020, 07:56:00 AM
Kimberly Guilfoyle, the girlfriend of Donald Trump's eldest son and a senior fundraising official for the president's re-election, tested positive for Covid-19, the Trump campaign said...

Kimberly Guilfoyle, the girlfriend of President Trump's eldest son and a top fundraising official for the Trump re-election campaign, tested positive for the coronavirus on Friday before a Fourth of July event at Mount Rushmore, the New York Times reported, citing a person familiar with her condition.

Guilfoyle traveled to South Dakota with Donald Trump Jr. to attend a huge fireworks display where the president was set to speak. They didn't travel on Air Force One, according to the person, and she was the only person in the group who tested positive, the paper said.

Those who come in close contact with the president are screened for the virus as protection, the paper said, adding that Guilfoyle is the third person in possible proximity to him known to have contracted the virus. She wasn't experiencing symptoms, and along with Donald Trump Jr., never met up with the president's entourage, the person familiar said. The couple plans to drive back from South Dakota to the East Coast, the person said.


So they'll drive from SD to the East Coast? Presumably staying at hotels, eating in restaurants, etc. along the way. Seriously, wouldn't a quarantine be mandated in this situation?
I'm sure those responsible citizens will take all precautions and inform others of the positive test!  :'(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 04, 2020, 07:58:11 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 03:49:33 AM
Common sense? No. That's not self evident. You'll need to convince me of that.

In the UK something came up which I believe behavioural scientists call behavioural fatigue. I think it's this: when you ask people to do constraining things, they may initially comply. But after a while they get tired of it and become less biddable, and there may even be a rebound effect where they rebel.

Is this relevant?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 04, 2020, 08:01:07 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 07:55:02 AM

     The "libertator" way is a fantasy. People will want governments to solve problems. They do, and won't stop.
.

Which is why it constantly necessary to point out that there are very few problems government can solve.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 04, 2020, 08:18:57 AM
These sports teams need to just give up and stay put. It was announced a mere 20 minutes ago that half of the Atlanta Braves players have COVID. What is wrong with these people? Is no one taking this seriously? I guess when they wind up on a respirator in a hospital bed is when these people might start using their heads. The sheer ignorance of the American public never ceases to bewilder me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 04, 2020, 08:22:36 AM
Sports Agent Bullish on Baseball Safety (11:10 a.m. NY [7/4/2020])
Sports agent Scott Boras, who represents some of the highest-paid professional baseball players, said he's convinced games can safely return this month without fans, even as Covid-19 cases surge. In an interview, Boras cited the experience of Korea, Japan and Taiwan, where games were played without hospitalizations.

Four players have decided to sit out the year and on Friday the game's biggest star, Mike Trout, said he's concerned about playing with his wife pregnant. Thirty-one players and seven staff members tested positive for Covid-19, according to an announcement from Major League Baseball and the players union. That was 1.2% of the total 3,185 samples, a rate lower than 5% of players reported by the National Basketball Association in its initial round of testing.


Uh, Scott... [South] Korea*, Japan and Taiwan happen to be more advanced societies with non-backward populaces.

*North Korea reports no coronavirus cases, but they don't have professional baseball... ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 08:34:13 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 07:55:02 AM
     
     No, they are accurate.

They are both demonstrably false.

Exhibit A: True case in Romania.

A small town, social-democratic mayor. For years and years citizens living on street X petitioned the mayor with a request for repairing the asphalt of their street, to no avail whatsoever. Eventually, they assembled as active citizenry, put their money together, hired a contractor and repaired the street on their own  money. Net result: the then social-democratic active government sued them for doing illegal works on public roads.

Exhibit B. True case in Romania

No "liberty lover" I know --- which in Romanian context actually means non-socialist --- thinks or says or prints that people who vote socialists are children. Uneducated, ignorant, misinformed, duped and taken advantage of, yes (sounds familiar?) --- children, never.

You see, the USA is not the whole world, and an American's trash might be a Romanian's treasure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 04, 2020, 09:23:03 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 04, 2020, 07:58:11 AM
In the UK something came up which I believe behavioural scientists call behavioural fatigue. I think it's this: when you ask people to do constraining things, they may initially comply. But after a while they get tired of it and become less biddable, and there may even be a rebound effect where they rebel.

Is this relevant?

I think so. We see that behavioural fatigue here, and most probably all over the place where confinement has taken place. The big talk from the health authorities is to beware of any relâchement (slackening, loosening).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 04, 2020, 09:25:14 AM
I had a haircut today!  :) :) :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 09:27:56 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 07:55:02 AM
People will want governments to solve problems. They do, and won't stop.

Oh I agree --- people want governments to solve problems. Only problem is, (modern & democratic) governments solve problems at a slower rate than they create them.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 04, 2020, 09:39:13 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 04, 2020, 09:25:14 AM
I had a haircut today!  :) :) :)

Excellent! I had one on Tuesday, June 23. Barber had reopened (appt. only, 1 customer in shop at a time) June 9, but out of caution I waited 2 weeks. The haircut was sorely needed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 10:27:37 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 08:34:13 AM


Exhibit A: True case in Romania.

A small town, social-democratic mayor. For years and years citizens living on street X petitioned the mayor with a request for repairing the asphalt of their street, to no avail whatsoever. Eventually, they assembled as active citizenry, put their money together, hired a contractor and repaired the street on their own  money. Net result: the then social-democratic active government sued them for doing illegal works on public roads.


I'd like to see a link for that to get the whole story.

Because my first reaction is that there are all manner of complexities and knock on effects of doing something as seemingly simple as paving a road that citizenry wouldn't have been aware of. Water and power utilities are usually laid below street plans and they could potentially damage them or at least hinder access to repair. Streets need to be graded in specific ways to allow water runoff and have drainage for that runoff. The material used needs to have specific characteristics to limit skiding or sliding. And so on and so on. Hundreds of moving parts that require coordination and the accumulated best practices of decades of study.

I'd also like to see from the original story how much they paid for what quality they got vs the same via taxation and a government approved contractor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 10:52:18 AM
It should be quite clear that I said neither of those things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 11:03:02 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 04, 2020, 08:01:07 AM
Which is why it constantly necessary to point out that there are very few problems government can solve.

     Everything government does is a solution, and it can also be a a problem. The method can be described as trading old problems for new ones we would prefer to have. We'll never stop doing it no matter what's pointed out.

     Libertarians don't have much to offer that's different from more disciplined and realistic appraisals of order versus liberty tradeoffs. What they offer is a form of utopian denial of the problem. If only we didn't have government we wouldn't have problems for government to solve. No one lives that way and no one ever will. The ideas are not designed for practical use.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 11:05:19 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 10:27:37 AM
I'd also like to see from the original story how much they paid for what quality they got vs the same via taxation and a government approved contractor.

Anyone would have understood from my post that the (local) government did extract taxes from them and did nothing at all in return, not even setting up an auction for the street work --- for years.

Your retort is on the same league as those who belittled Mother Theresa of Calcutta for having taken care of Indian lepers for 50 years --- yeah, well, but she was no medically trained nurse!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 04, 2020, 11:06:45 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 04, 2020, 09:25:14 AM
I had a haircut today!  :) :) :)
Whoo hooooo! Congrats Jeffrey!

Still long here....one of these days!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 04, 2020, 11:18:36 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 04, 2020, 11:03:02 AM
     Everything government does is a solution, and it can also be a a problem. The method can be described as trading old problems for new ones we would prefer to have. We'll never stop doing it no matter what's pointed out.

     Libertarians don't have much to offer that's different from more disciplined and realistic appraisals of order versus liberty tradeoffs. What they offer is a form of utopian denial of the problem. If only we didn't have government we wouldn't have problems for government to solve. No one lives that way and no one ever will. The ideas are not designed for practical use.

Crime and health care access are problems. Can they be permanently  solved? Of course not. They can, however, be managed. Over the centuries experience has shown government is the best way to manage the problem of crime.  We've had a much shorter span of experience dealing with health care, of course,  So far experience has shown  government  to be a sub-optimal manager of health care.

Libertarianism  does not deny any problems. It merely points to three truths: Some problems can not be solved. For those  that can be solved, government is often  not the best solution. And often  government becomes a bigger problem than the problems it claims  to solve,

Libertarianism  is in fact the most realistic appraisal of liberty vs order, because it doesn't  pretend  government  is something  government  is not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 11:21:52 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 11:05:19 AM
Anyone but a fanatical statist would have understood from my post that the (local) government did extract taxes from them and did nothing at all in return, not even setting up an auction for the street work --- for years.

Your retort is on the same league as those who belittled Mother Theresa of Calcutta for having taken care of Indian lepers for 50 years --- yeah, well, but she was no trained medical nurse!

Disgusting and morally bankrupt.

I have no idea why you're getting so upset.

Which town or city is it you're talking about?
I'd like to look further into it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 04, 2020, 02:20:02 PM
And, from San Antonio, TX: Doctor: The patients are getting younger and are more sick
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 11:42:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 04, 2020, 11:21:52 AM
I have no idea why you're getting so upset.

I've been very stressed as of late and become irascible. I'm sorry.

Quote
Which town or city is it you're talking about?
I'd like to look further into it.

https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/evenimente/trimisi-in-judecata-pentru-ca-au-asfaltat-singuri-drumul-492619 (https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/evenimente/trimisi-in-judecata-pentru-ca-au-asfaltat-singuri-drumul-492619)

Romanian only but if you click on the video you can actually see the road and the repairing. I didn't remember correctly all the details: they didn't even hire a contractor, they repaired the holes themselves.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 05, 2020, 12:05:43 AM
Thanks. And don't worry about it. I shouldn't have added the "libertarian" dig to my criticism of the Politico article, so that ones on me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 05, 2020, 01:43:20 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 05, 2020, 12:05:43 AM
Thanks. And don't worry about it. I shouldn't have added the "libertarian" dig to my criticism of the Politico article, so that ones on me.

Thank you too. Btw, I am not a libertarian.

EDIT: In principle, you are right that repairing a road might not be as straighforward and it could involve taking care of the underground utilities network. But in this case it was not so. The road was littered with holes which damaged their cars and fed up with waiting in vain for the government to do its duty they took the matter in their own hands. To sue them for that (punishment being a fine ro even 6 months in prison) strikes me as profoundly unjust and downright idiotic. Here you have a government which actively discourages citizens from being active.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 06:35:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 09:27:56 AM
Oh I agree --- people want governments to solve problems. Only problem is, (modern & democratic) governments solve problems at a slower rate than they create them.  ;D

     Most people know that governments that refuse to solve problems (or create more than they solve) should be voted out.

     Governments do fix roads, and people would rather do their own jobs than do jobs governments exist to do.

     I don't want to create my own money, police my town, take care of water and sanitation, invade my least favorite countries, make friends with my favorite dictators or take care of the poor and elderly. I delegate the responsibility. I don't think pandemics can be fought by me and my pals.

     Final point, because liberty fantasies have no practical meaning it's clear that they can't improve function. They can only prevent function. They are a way for governments to not fix roads. But, as in the Romanian case, governments don't need a liberty ideology to not fix roads, they can just not fix them, while the citizenry retreats into a fantasy about how governments are not supposed to fix them, thus turning defeat into some kind of victory. I'd prefer to vote in a government that fixes the damn road. That works.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 05, 2020, 06:36:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 04, 2020, 11:42:06 PM
I've been very stressed as of late and become irascible. I'm sorry.



Courage!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 07:19:22 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 04, 2020, 11:18:36 AM
Crime and health care access are problems. Can they be permanently  solved? Of course not. They can, however, be managed. Over the centuries experience has shown government is the best way to manage the problem of crime.  We've had a much shorter span of experience dealing with health care, of course,  So far experience has shown  government  to be a sub-optimal manager of health care.

Libertarianism  does not deny any problems. It merely points to three truths: Some problems can not be solved. For those  that can be solved, government is often  not the best solution. And often  government becomes a bigger problem than the problems it claims  to solve,

Libertarianism  is in fact the most realistic appraisal of liberty vs order, because it doesn't  pretend  government  is something  government  is not.

     The answer will not be found in absolute pronouncements but in improving function. That's something we do, so we might as well put it in an ideology.

     Public health measures are not brand new. Medicare works well, and to the extent it doesn't work optimally, it can be improved. The liberty view would have to be that Medicare doesn't work because it's government, which doesn't solve problems. The facts can be ignored if they don't fit the fantasy.

     Which problems can be solved or managed or lived with are empirical questions that policy makers must wrestle with, and the citizens who elect representatives have to wrestle with them, too. Imposing an a priori truth regimen about some problems not having solutions adds nothing of value. However well or poorly Medicare or Social Security work can't be determined that way. No ideology provides you with useful clues as to how "hollowed out" the CDC should be, or how much infrastructure not to build. All it can do is offer thin excuses for not acting to repair what fools have destroyed. See, bad government proves government is bad. I don't accept this. I think we can do better than make excuses for bad policy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 05, 2020, 07:40:32 AM
My county in NY had been doing well. I follow the statistics daily, and there was an alarming spike on Friday. No explanation from the County (holiday weekend), but the following story has appeared:
https://www.dailyfreeman.com/news/local-news/ulster-county-spike-in-coronavirus-cases-linked-to-four-clusters/article_2f6932f6-bd76-11ea-8db6-1b7fb956433a.html (https://www.dailyfreeman.com/news/local-news/ulster-county-spike-in-coronavirus-cases-linked-to-four-clusters/article_2f6932f6-bd76-11ea-8db6-1b7fb956433a.html)
Potential clusters: prison(s), high school graduation party(ies), factory workers, migrant farm workers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 08:17:20 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 05, 2020, 07:40:32 AM
My county in NY had been doing well. I follow the statistics daily, and there was an alarming spike on Friday. No explanation from the County (holiday weekend), but the following story has appeared:
https://www.dailyfreeman.com/news/local-news/ulster-county-spike-in-coronavirus-cases-linked-to-four-clusters/article_2f6932f6-bd76-11ea-8db6-1b7fb956433a.html (https://www.dailyfreeman.com/news/local-news/ulster-county-spike-in-coronavirus-cases-linked-to-four-clusters/article_2f6932f6-bd76-11ea-8db6-1b7fb956433a.html)
Potential clusters: prison(s), high school graduation party(ies), factory workers, migrant farm workers.

     I have quasi-relatives in Genesee county, just outside Buffalo. They've had 581 cases and 64 deaths from a population of 58,000. Proportionally the numbers are close to Watertown, MA.

     I went to a local restaurant the other day. It was strange to be sitting in a booth eating food. I do worry some that Massachusetts will become complacent now that the numbers have gone down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 05, 2020, 08:22:28 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 07:19:22 AM
     The answer will not be found in absolute pronouncements but in improving function. That's something we do, so we might as well put it in an ideology.

     Public health measures are not brand new. Medicare works well, and to the extent it doesn't work optimally, it can be improved. The liberty view would have to be that Medicare doesn't work because it's government, which doesn't solve problems. The facts can be ignored if they don't fit the fantasy.

     Which problems can be solved or managed or lived with are empirical questions that policy makers must wrestle with, and the citizens who elect representatives have to wrestle with them, too. Imposing an a priori truth regimen about some problems not having solutions adds nothing of value. However well or poorly Medicare or Social Security work can't be determined that way. No ideology provides you with useful clues as to how "hollowed out" the CDC should be, or how much infrastructure not to build. All it can do is offer thin excuses for not acting to repair what fools have destroyed. See, bad government proves government is bad. I don't accept this. I think we can do better than make excuses for bad policy.
Government is always inefficient. Therefore it is useful only when non governmental means are even less efficient.   That is not ideology. It's a fact for which we have millenia of history to provide confirming data. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 05, 2020, 08:48:24 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 08:22:28 AM
Government is always inefficient. Therefore it is useful only when non governmental means are even less efficient.   That is not ideology. It's a fact for which we have millenia of history to provide confirming data.

Have you been abroad?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 09:04:28 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 08:22:28 AM
Government is always inefficient.

     It's efficient for government to do the things we ask government to do. It's more inefficient to leave them undone.

     I view government as the means by which private action can be most profitable. Its efficiency must be measured accordingly. Jobs, wages, profits and other measures of advancement should include the government contribution. The most advanced economies have large government sectors relative to basic functions like agriculture and manufacturing. I see that as an efficient use of resources. If we all were employed as farmers, factory workers and mechanics we'd be a poor country. No rich country is like that. One has to conclude that measuring government as inefficient is missing something very big, and since it's in plain sight that rich countries have large government sectors, one must find the source of the mis-measurement.

     Government builds the platforms on which private industries can efficiently run. The tendency is to attribute efficiency to the private contribution that follows on what government builds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 05, 2020, 09:54:31 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 08:22:28 AM
Government is always inefficient. Therefore it is useful only when non governmental means are even less efficient.   That is not ideology. It's a fact for which we have millenia of history to provide confirming data.

I'm sorry, but you have been brainwashed.... ;)

"Unity makes strength" was the motto of the Dutch Republic.

And in a democratic society, governement can be the exponent and forceful tool of that unity.

Q

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 05, 2020, 10:04:27 AM
Quote from: Que on July 05, 2020, 09:54:31 AM
I'm sorry, but you have been brainwashed.... ;)

"Unity makes strength" was the motto of the Dutch Republic.

And in a democratic society, governement can be the exponent and forceful tool of that unity.

Q

That motto could have been used by any dictator, you know.

Government was necessary to get rid of the Spanish, build the dikes and drain the polders. But because it is necessary for some things does not mean it is necessary for other things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 05, 2020, 10:08:01 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 05, 2020, 09:04:28 AM
     It's efficient for government to do the things we ask government to do. It's more inefficient to leave them undone.

     I view government as the means by which private action can be most profitable. Its efficiency must be measured accordingly. Jobs, wages, profits and other measures of advancement should include the government contribution. The most advanced economies have large government sectors relative to basic functions like agriculture and manufacturing. I see that as an efficient use of resources. If we all were employed as farmers, factory workers and mechanics we'd be a poor country. No rich country is like that. One has to conclude that measuring government as inefficient is missing something very big, and since it's in plain sight that rich countries have large government sectors, one must find the source of the mis-measurement.

     Government builds the platforms on which private industries can efficiently run. The tendency is to attribute efficiency to the private contribution that follows on what government builds.

Perhaps rich countries would be richer with smaller government sectors...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 05, 2020, 11:08:13 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 10:04:27 AM
That motto could have been used by any dictator, you know.

They could use it, but I haven't seen a dictator that really unites people other than in fear.

QuoteGovernment was necessary to get rid of the Spanish, build the dikes and drain the polders. But because it is necessary for some things does not mean it is necessary for other things.

Like security, prosperity and peaceful coexistence?  :)

You are right that our view of the concept of government is shaped by our respective histories.
But keep in mind that I also live on a continent that was brought to the brink of destruction by dictatorships - twice.

I'm just not sure if a distrust in government out of fear of dictatorship is going to be helpful to tackle present day world's problems or is sufficient to shape a modern society.

If you live in a functional democracy, you should be able to trust your own government.
IMO governement is not the issue to focus on, democracy is.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 05, 2020, 11:20:40 AM
Quote from: Que on July 05, 2020, 11:08:13 AM
I also live on a continent that was brought to the brink of destruction by dictatorships - twice.

One is WWII, for sure. What is the other?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 05, 2020, 11:25:11 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 08:22:28 AM
Government is always inefficient.

Depends on how wisely the people have voted. When your inefficient government finally gets Covid-19 in control and EU allows US citizens to enter, you are welcome to Finland to see yourself how goverment can function pretty efficiently.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 05, 2020, 11:34:06 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 05, 2020, 06:36:29 AM
Courage!

Thanks, Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 05, 2020, 12:14:03 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 05, 2020, 08:48:24 AM
Have you been abroad?


Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 10:04:27 AM
That motto could have been used by any dictator, you know.

Government was necessary to get rid of the Spanish, build the dikes and drain the polders. But because it is necessary for some things does not mean it is necessary for other things.

Have you been abroad? I'm seriously interested in this, because you don't seem to know how a real lot of countries function and evolve. Or are your entries just examples of joking, polemical Utopianism?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 05, 2020, 12:49:51 PM
Quote from: Que on July 05, 2020, 11:08:13 AM
.

Like security, prosperity and peaceful coexistence?  :)

You are right that our view of the concept of government is shaped by our respective histories.
But keep in mind that I also live on a continent that was brought to the brink of destruction by dictatorships - twice.

I'm just not sure if a distrust in government out of fear of dictatorship is going to be helpful to tackle present day world's problems or is sufficient to shape a modern society.

If you live in a functional democracy, you should be able to trust your own government.
IMO governement is not the issue to focus on, democracy is.

Q

In a truly functional democracy, government would be perpetually distrusted, to make sure it is doing what it is supposed to be doing, and nothing else.

And it's an old truism in political thought. Government can not provide "security, prosperity and peaceful coexistence". It can only provide the conditions that allow the public at large to become secure, prosperous, and peaceful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 05, 2020, 12:58:34 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 05, 2020, 12:14:03 PM

Have you been abroad? I'm seriously interested in this, because you don't seem to know how a real lot of countries function and evolve. Or are your entries just examples of joking, polemical Utopianism?

Somewhat, as a tourist. So the internal politics and government of the place I was wasn't at the forefront.

But the principles are the same everywhere. Some things can only be done by the government (like police and army). Some things are done by government but could be done by private companies, but it's more efficient to have government do it. Others are done by government, but only because people are used to government doing it.  The second category is more limited, the third category much larger, than people generally realize.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 05, 2020, 03:07:13 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 05, 2020, 11:34:06 AM
Thanks, Karl.
Deep breaths Florestan.  I'm sorry to hear that it's been rough for you lately; I suspect that we all have good and bad moments or days these days in particular.  So much news to digest....a lot of which is bad.  Can be a struggle to stay positive.  Hard to figure out what to do and/or if one can help things and if so, how.  And if figured out, finding the energy, spirit and strength to do so.  In any event, it's brutal emotionally and physically.  I think that we all get that here.  Sorry, I'm probably not saying this well...I certainly don't want to make it sound 'trite' because it isn't.

You're not alone. 

Warm wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:05:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 05, 2020, 03:07:13 PM
Deep breaths Florestan.  I'm sorry to hear that it's been rough for you lately; I suspect that we all have good and bad moments or days these days in particular.  So much news to digest....a lot of which is bad.  Can be a struggle to stay positive.  Hard to figure out what to do and/or if one can help things and if so, how.  And if figured out, finding the energy, spirit and strength to do so.  In any event, it's brutal emotionally and physically.  I think that we all get that here.  Sorry, I'm probably not saying this well...I certainly don't want to make it sound 'trite' because it isn't.

You're not alone. 

Warm wishes,

PD

Thank you for your kind words, PD. All the best to you too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 07:04:46 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 05, 2020, 12:58:34 PM
But the principles are the same everywhere. Some things can only be done by the government (like police and army).

You forgot to mention justice.

QuoteSome things are done by government but could be done by private companies, but it's more efficient to have government do it.

Such as?

Quote
Others are done by government, but only because people are used to government doing it. 

Such as?

I am not being provocative here, mind you. Although not a libertarian, I am not a statist either (although as a Yurpean, my degree of statism might be greater than that of a Murican). I ask because I am genuinely interested in your thoughts on these matters.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 06, 2020, 07:58:04 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 07:04:46 AM
You forgot to mention justice.

Such as?

Such as?

I am not being provocative here, mind you. Although not a libertarian, I am not a statist either (although as a Yurpean, my degree of statism might be greater than that of a Murican). I ask because I am genuinely interested in your thoughts on these matters.
Stuff it's more efficient for Government to do, but private could do: streets and roads
Stuff government does only because we're used to government doing it: mail

But we're going way off topic here...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 08:19:14 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 06, 2020, 07:58:04 AM
Stuff it's more efficient for Government to do, but private could do: streets and roads

Well, it might be more efficient for the US government to do streets and roads, but the Romanian government is dirt lousy in this respect. It could take seven long years to build a traffic bridge or an underground traffic passage (I know that from personal experience) --- and don't think they're done by any governmental company because there are none: everything is done by private companies who compete for being given the work, and it implies lots of bribes (which raise the cost) and lots of delays (because of the ensuing lawsuits).

No, really, I mean it: the Romanian traffic infrastructure is probably the worse in the whole Eastern Europe and if the curses of drivers, both civil and commercial, are anything to go by, all Romanian ministers of transportation since 1990 until present will burn in hell.  ;D

Quote
Stuff government does only because we're used to government doing it: mail

I don't know about USA, but in Romania if I have to send a package to someone I never use the governmental postal service, only private ones. Ditto for ordering stuff online, I prefer private through and through --- it's much faster, safer and customer-friendly than the governmental one.

So you see, as I told drogulus before: the USA is not the whole world and what works wonders there might not work at all in another spot or viceversa.  :D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 09:27:31 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 08:19:14 AM
Well, it might be more efficient for the US government to do streets and roads, but the Romanian government is dirt lousy in this respect. It could take seven long years to build a traffic bridge or an underground traffic passage (I know that from personal experience) --- and don't think they're done by any governmental company because there are none: everything is done by private companies who compete for being given the work, and it implies lots of bribes (which raise the cost) and lots of delays (because of the ensuing lawsuits).

No, really, I mean it: the Romanian traffic infrastructure is probably the worse in the whole Eastern Europe and if the curses of drivers, both civil and commercial, are anything to go by, all Romanian ministers of transportation since 1990 until present will burn in hell.  ;D

I don't know about USA, but in Romania if I have to send a package to someone I never use the governmental postal service, only private ones. Ditto for ordering stuff online, I prefer private through and through --- it's much faster, safer and customer-friendly than the governmental one.

So you see, as I told drogulus before: the USA is not the whole world and what works wonders there might not work at all in another spot or viceversa.  :D



Yes, but Americans are used to the Government doing the mail, because the Postal Service was authorized by the US Constitution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 09:29:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 06, 2020, 09:27:31 AM
Yes, but Americans are used to the Government doing the mail, because the Postal Service was authorized by the US Constitution.

I know that --- but is there really no private postal service at all in the US?  ???

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 09:38:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 09:29:35 AM
I know that --- but is there really no private postal service at all in the US?  ???
There are various delivery companies like Federal Express and United Parcel Services (like for packages or overnight letter/document services), but no alternate mail service per se...like for inexpensive letter, bill or magazine deliveries.  The USPS (United States Postal Service aka US Mail) does also have expedited services too.

PD

p.s.  It's currently 55 cents to send a letter, bill, card at the moment (presuming that it's under a certain weight and is not an unusual sized one).  There are discounts for sending mass mailings (like catalogues and magazines) and also a lower media mail rate (for things like books).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 09:50:54 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 09:29:35 AM
I know that --- but is there really no private postal service at all in the US?  ???



Interesting question, since at this point FedEx and UPS are both publicly traded stocks. But, they are not government entities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:01:00 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 09:38:55 AM
There are various delivery companies like Federal Express and United Parcel Services (like for packages or overnight letter/document services), but no alternate mail service per se...like for inexpensive letter, bill or magazine deliveries.  T

But, but... with e-mail and phone being instant and free I do wonder who sends letters by post anymore?  ???

A postal service for packages and online order deliveries, useful alright --- but for letters proper? This sounds like Paleozoic to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 10:05:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:01:00 AM
But, but... with e-mail and phone being instant and free I do wonder who sends letters by post anymore?  ???

A postal service for packages and online order deliveries, useful alright --- but for letters proper? This sounds like Paleozoic to me.

Well, with my wife & mom-in-law out of state during the pandemic, when a piece of snail-mail comes in, which they need, I go to the Post Office to forward it to them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 10:06:08 AM
Also greeting cards have not yet gone completely e-mail.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:08:20 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:01:00 AM
But, but... with e-mail and phone being instant and free I do wonder who sends letters by post anymore?  ???

A postal service for packages and online order deliveries, useful alright --- but for letters proper? This sounds like Paleozoic to me.
Think about this:  remember what it felt like to receive a letter or a card with a hand-written note?   :)

Wonder how the popularity of emails/computer technology has changed history for historians trying to do research?  And what will future museums look like?  No letters in cases or diaries for researchers to dig through or the public to see?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 10:10:43 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 09:29:35 AM
I know that --- but is there really no private postal service at all in the US?  ???


All competing private courier servicers will happily deliver letters for the right price.  (Unless the recipient uses a PO box in some cases . . .)


Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:01:00 AM...but for letters proper? This sounds like Paleozoic to me.


Yep.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:12:25 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 10:10:43 AM

All competing private courier servicers will happily deliver letters for the right price.  (Unless the recipient uses a PO box in some cases . . .


Yes, but not for anything near 55 cents.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 10:14:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:08:20 AM
Think about this:  remember what it felt like to receive a letter or a card with a hand-written note?   :)

PD

Verily.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 10:17:20 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:12:25 AM

Yes, but not for anything near 55 cents.


Correct.  Private companies cannot compete on price with a directly subsidized entity.  But Americans have multiple choices for sending letters, postcards, etc. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:23:11 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 06, 2020, 10:05:15 AM
Well, with my wife & mom-in-law out of state during the pandemic, when a piece of snail-mail comes in, which they need, I go to the Post Office to forward it to them.

Paleozoic, I tellya.. You could have used the camera on your phone tp take a picture of it and then forward it via Whatsup or E-mail (works by phone as well). Five minutes at most to send and receive/open it, as opposed to... what, at least a few hours/days? ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:28:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:23:11 AM
Paleozoic, I tellya.. You could have used the camera on your phone tp take a picture of it and then forward it via Whatsup or E-mail (works by phone as well). Five minutes at most to send and receive/open it, as opposed to... what, at least a few hours/days? ;D
But that also violates their privacy (actually is a federal offense....unless one is asked to do so).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:30:13 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:08:20 AM
Think about this:  remember what it felt like to receive a letter or a card with a hand-written note?   :)

Honestly, dear PD, I am old enough to know what you're talking about --- no, I never felt any particular thrill receiving a hand-written letter, or writing one (I am a caligraphy guy, never satisfied with my hand-writing). Communication is not about the medium, but about the message. The faster it's delivered, the better. YMMV, of course.  ;)

Quote
Wonder how the popularity of emails/computer technology has changed history for historians trying to do research?  And what will future museums look like?  No letters in cases or diaries for researchers to dig through or the public to see?

That's a big problem, one that I'll gladly grant you.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:34:30 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:30:13 AM
Honestly, dear PD, I am old enough to know what you're talking about --- no, I never felt any particular thrill receiving a hand-written letter, or writing one (I am a caligraphy guy, never satisfied with my hand-writing). Communication is not about the medium, but about the message. The faster it's delivered, the better. YMMV, of course.  ;)

That's a big problem, one that I'll gladly grant you.  :D
Your Mileage May Vary??  :-[ ???

And, yes, it's the message that counts the most, still....

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 10:35:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:30:13 AMCommunication is not about the medium, but about the message.


Most of the time yes, but sometimes the medium is important - eg, a stylized wedding invitation, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 06, 2020, 10:51:00 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:08:20 AM


Wonder how the popularity of emails/computer technology has changed history for historians trying to do research?  And what will future museums look like?  No letters in cases or diaries for researchers to dig through or the public to see?

PD

I heard Doris Kearns Goodwin take this question and she said the big noticible gap in source material for biographers comes with the invention of the telephone.

I also have a horrible suspicion that future biographers are going to have more info than the want from people's internet history.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:52:46 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 10:35:29 AM

Most of the time yes, but sometimes the medium is important - eg, a stylized wedding invitation, etc.

Ah, yes, of course, I do completely agree about wedding invitation --- but the Romanian custom is that the wedding invitation be delivered in person, not by mail, by either the groom or the bride. Now, of course, Romania is about 250,000 km2 (which US state, I do wonder?) and usually a wedding invites people within 100 kms at most --- and I'm being generous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 11:02:33 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 06, 2020, 10:51:00 AM
I heard Doris Kearns Goodwin take this question and she said the big noticible gap in source material for biographers comes with the invention of the telephone.

I also have a horrible suspicion that future biographers are going to have more info than the want from people's internet history.
Interesting Simon!  I could certainly see how the telephone would have changes things...though these days, there's also texting, etc. on a phone.

Re internet history.  Possibly, but things can also be deleted too!  On a smaller scale level, what happens if no one in your family knows your computer password?  All of the lost photos, emails/correspondence, records?  Actually, not long ago, I read (somewhere) about what happens to all of your uploaded photos if no one knows your password to the account (let alone your computer one)?  They could all be lost when you die.  That could be a lot of family photos and history that goes bye bye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 11:04:10 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:52:46 AM
Ah, yes, of course, I do completely agree about wedding invitation --- but the Romanian custom is that the wedding invitation be delivered in person, not by mail, by either the groom or the bride. Now, of course, Romania is about 250,000 km2 (which US state, I do wonder?) and usually a wedding invites people within 100 kms at most --- and I'm being generous.
Neat custom!  :)  Would be hard for out-of-country relatives and friends to receive their invites this way these days though.   ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 11:06:39 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:23:11 AM
Paleozoic, I tellya.. You could have used the camera on your phone tp take a picture of it and then forward it via Whatsup or E-mail (works by phone as well). Five minutes at most to send and receive/open it, as opposed to... what, at least a few hours/days? ;D

Mom is not as at ease with "soft copy" management as some of us; also, I could not do that with medication which I needed to forward to her ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 11:08:28 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:52:46 AM
Ah, yes, of course, I do completely agree about wedding invitation --- but the Romanian custom is that the wedding invitation be delivered in person, not by mail, by either the groom or the bride. Now, of course, Romania is about 250,000 km2 (which US state, I do wonder?) and usually a wedding invites people within 100 kms at most --- and I'm being generous.


Special communications cover multiple special occasions - weddings, graduations, funerals, baby showers, Christmas, etc - and the geographic distribution can be national or global, depending on the recipient pool.  I have relatives from coast to coast, plus Alaska, for instance.  I have neighbors and co-workers with friends and family on every continent save Antarctica, and in I don't know how many countries.  And if my key vendors do not send me a fancy holiday card each year, the next annual performance review may not be quite so kindly . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 06, 2020, 11:08:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 11:02:33 AM
Interesting Simon!  I could certainly see how the telephone would have changes things...though these days, there's also texting, etc. on a phone.

Re internet history.  Possibly, but things can also be deleted too!  On a smaller scale level, what happens if no one in your family knows your computer password?  All of the lost photos, emails/correspondence, records?  Actually, not long ago, I read (somewhere) about what happens to all of your uploaded photos if no one knows your password to the account (let alone your computer one)?  They could all be lost when you die.  That could be a lot of family photos and history that goes bye bye.

Your internet provider will still have your history even after you've cleared it from your pc. I meant future biographers may have access to that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 11:09:28 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:30:13 AM
Honestly, dear PD, I am old enough to know what you're talking about --- no, I never felt any particular thrill receiving a hand-written letter, or writing one (I am a caligraphy guy, never satisfied with my hand-writing). Communication is not about the medium, but about the message. The faster it's delivered, the better. YMMV, of course.  ;)

It is not only because my mother does not use e-mail, that I especially enjoy getting a birthday card in the mail from her.


Probably a Mod should peel all this tangent away to another thread
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on July 06, 2020, 11:14:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 10:52:46 AM
Ah, yes, of course, I do completely agree about wedding invitation --- but the Romanian custom is that the wedding invitation be delivered in person, not by mail, by either the groom or the bride. Now, of course, Romania is about 250,000 km2 (which US state, I do wonder?) and usually a wedding invites people within 100 kms at most --- and I'm being generous.
Michigan fits the bill: https://www.thoughtco.com/list-of-us-states-by-area-1435813

EDIT: Nevermind...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:15:22 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2020, 10:28:11 AM
But that also violates their privacy (actually is a federal offense....unless one is asked to do so).

I don't really get it. Suppose I receive in my physical postal mailbox a letter from the government recommending/mandating me to do this & this and not to do that & that. I take a photo of that with my phone and send it via Whatsup to anyone I see fit. What federal offense am I guilty of?  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 11:16:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:15:22 AM
I don't really get it. Suppose I receive in my physical postal mailbox a letter from the government recommending/mandating me to do this & this and not to do that & that. I take a photo of that with my phone and send it via Whatsup to anyone I see fit. What federal offense am I guilty of?  ???

Opening mail not addressed to you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:19:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 06, 2020, 11:06:39 AM
Mom is not as at ease with "soft copy" management as some of us; also, I could not do that with medication which I needed to forward to her ;)

Blimey, Karl! In Romania you just ask your GP of specialist doctor for a receipt of your usual medication, they send it to you via Whatsup, you go to any pharmacy of your choice, show the receipt on your phone and the pharmacist delivers your medication alright.

Is this not the usual US procedure?  ???

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on July 06, 2020, 11:22:02 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:19:53 AM
Blimey, Karl! In Romania you just ask your GP of specialist doctor for a receipt of your usual medication, they send it to you via Whatsup, you go to any pharmacy of your choice, show the receipt on your phone and the pharmacist delivers your medication alright.

Is this not the usual US procedure?  ???
I think you were being too kind with your Paleozoic comment earlier. If only it were that easy...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 06, 2020, 11:16:14 AM
Opening mail not addressed to you.

I open mail addressed to me nominally. I photo it and forward to my wife. Have I committed a federal offense?  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:23:58 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on July 06, 2020, 11:22:02 AM
I think you were being too kind with your Paleozoic comment earlier. If only it were that easy...

What???  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 11:25:46 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:22:27 AM
I open mail addressed to me nominally. I photo it and forward to my wife. Have I committed a federal offense?  ???


I don't believe US courts have expanded extraterritoriality to the opening of mail in other countries.  Yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:26:00 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 06, 2020, 11:08:53 AM
Your internet provider will still have your history even after you've cleared it from your pc. I meant future biographers may have access to that.

Oh drat! Please, Simon, don't tell that to my wife!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 11:26:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:19:53 AM
Blimey, Karl! In Romania you just ask your GP of specialist doctor for a receipt of your usual medication, they send it to you via Whatsup, you go to any pharmacy of your choice, show the receipt on your phone and the pharmacist delivers your medication alright.

Is this not the usual US procedure?  ???



Well, I prefer not to explain here;  but it was an example of why I recently stopped over at the post office.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:27:22 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 11:25:46 AM

I don't believe US courts have expanded extraterritoriality to the opening of mail in other countries.  Yet.

Correction. I'm a US citizen living in NY. I open mail addressed to me nominally. I photo it and forward to my wife. Have I committed a federal offense?   ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mc ukrneal on July 06, 2020, 11:30:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:23:58 AM
What???  :o
Where I live - the doctor gives you a piece or paper and you take that to the pharmacy. If the doctor prescribes the wrong medicine (I mean here a branded name instead of a generic), you might have to pay a lot more OR go through the effort of back and forth with your doctor and your pharmacy and likely insurance company, if you have insurance. Refills can be done automatically, until the number of refills is used up and then the pharmacy has to CALL the doctor's office, which can be tricky at times. You can then get your 3/5/other number of refills as allowed. If you want a supply of medicine for greater than 30 days (say, something you take everyday for whatever reason), you might not be able to if the insurance company doesn't allow it OR you will have to go via mail with THEIR provider of the medicine. If you go away for three months, you have to go through a highly irritating process to get the medicine while you are away. Anyway, a lot of fun! :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 06, 2020, 11:37:08 AM
"5 percent of Spain exposed to coronavirus but immunity unclear, antibody study finds
A nationwide antibody study found that 5 percent of Spain's population had been exposed to the novel coronavirus, Spanish officials announced Monday.

The research, which was published in the Lancet medical journal Monday, also suggested that immunity to the virus may be short-lived in some cases, as 14 percent of those who tested positive for antibodies in preliminary testing later tested negative.

Given the uncertainty about immunity, as well as the suggestion that the vast majority of people had not had the virus, even in hotspot areas, the researchers urged caution going forward. "These results emphasize the need for maintaining public health measures to avoid a new epidemic wave," they wrote.

Loss of immunity was most common among asymptomatic carriers, the researchers said, who in turn made up at least a third of all cases.

Spain initially saw one of the worst coronavirus outbreaks in the world. It has more than a quarter-of-a-million cases, with at least 28,385 deaths. Though the number of new cases has dropped from the highs of earlier this year, the provinces of Galicia and Catalonia reimposed restrictions this week due to new outbreaks."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 11:37:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:27:22 AM
Correction. I'm a US citizen living in NY. I open mail addressed to me nominally. I photo it and forward to my wife. Have I committed a federal offense?   ???


No, of course not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:51:58 AM
Quote from: mc ukrneal on July 06, 2020, 11:30:45 AM
Where I live - the doctor gives you a piece or paper and you take that to the pharmacy. If the doctor prescribes the wrong medicine (I mean here a branded name instead of a generic), you might have to pay a lot more OR go through the effort of back and forth with your doctor and your pharmacy and likely insurance company, if you have insurance. Refills can be done automatically, until the number of refills is used up and then the pharmacy has to CALL the doctor's office, which can be tricky at times. You can then get your 3/5/other number of refills as allowed. If you want a supply of medicine for greater than 30 days (say, something you take everyday for whatever reason), you might not be able to if the insurance company doesn't allow it OR you will have to go via mail with THEIR provider of the medicine. If you go away for three months, you have to go through a highly irritating process to get the medicine while you are away. Anyway, a lot of fun! :(

Oh gosh! OMG! I have long since suspected that at least when it comes to healthcare the USA is just like the Emperor's New Clothes but this just confirms my worst fears.

I'll give you the example of my father. He needs medication for depression. The psychiatrist --- but only one such ---  writes a receipt with the generic name on it --- a special kind of receipt for which we pay nothing at all in any pharmacy I go --- the government pays it all. I go to any pharmacy of my choice and if they have the medication --- they even ask me "what would you have, X or Y?" and then I tell them "Y" --- they give me the prescribed quantity. Usually any such receipt is valid for 30-day medication only, but I told my father's psychiatrist that I can't be physically present every month tio take the receipt, and she agreed --- multiple times, and it's not even an offense --- to prescribe the double quantity of medication just so that I come back for a receipt on September 1st rather than on August 1st.

My father's medicatuon is Duloxetine, for which we pay nothing at all --- it's all governmentally, single-payer, universal heathcare provided.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:52:36 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 11:37:29 AM

No, of course not.

I am relieved. I really am.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 12:00:00 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:51:58 AMOh gosh! OMG! I have long since suspected that at least when it comes to healthcare the USA is just like the Emperor's New Clothes but this just confirms my worst fears.


There are multiple healthcare delivery systems in the US.  I use an HMO, and all records and prescriptions are managed online through a secure portal.  All meds other than federally controlled narcotics and special use medications can be delivered via USPS.  Refills of routine meds are done online with about forty-five seconds of effort.

This of course differs substantially from insurance coverage.  Single payer (ie, Medicare For All) has a greater likelihood of coming to fruition than standardized healthcare delivery in all fifty states.  No one wants that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:03:30 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 12:00:00 PM

There are multiple healthcare delivery systems in the US.  I use an HMO, and all records and prescriptions are managed online through a secure portal.  All meds other than federally controlled narcotics and special use medications can be delivered via USPS.  Refills of routine meds are done online with about forty-five seconds of effort.

This of course differs substantially from insurance coverage.  Single payer (ie, Medicare For All) has a greater likelihood of coming to fruition than standardized healthcare delivery in all fifty states.  No one wants that.

All right, If you, and I mean you Todd,  ever --- and I wish you'd never ever --- need Duloxetine, could you have it without paying a single dime for it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 12:32:30 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:03:30 PM
All right, If you, and I mean you Todd,  ever --- and I wish you'd never ever --- need Duloxetine, could you have it without paying a single dime for it?


No, I would have to pay a copay, but my copay is so ridiculously low that it doesn't mean anything.  I am lucky in that regard. 

Ultimately, even in a single payer system, I would pay through increased taxation.  It's all about tradeoffs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:46:07 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 12:32:30 PM

No, I would have to pay a copay, but my copay is so ridiculously low that it doesn't mean anything.  I am lucky in that regard. 

Fine. Very fine. Lucky you! Are there people less fortunate than you which will have to pay for it significantly more than you?

Quote
Ultimately, even in a single payer system, I would pay through increased taxation.  It's all about tradeoffs.

I do agree.

Now, I am curious. My father can't walk anymore, he needs a wheelchair for going back and forth to and from radiotherapy. I can''t do it alone, I need a third party to help me. Does the US insurance cover all these third-party costs?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 01:08:28 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:46:07 PMAre there people less fortunate than you which will have to pay for it significantly more than you?


Most people with insurance have to pay more than I do, sometimes a lot more (as in 5-10 times more).  The terms of my current coverage are extremely generous.  I do know a very few people with even more generous plans (as in no copays or deductibles), but they are as rare as hen's teeth, and in every case they enjoy legacy plans that are not offered to new employees.  I have access to an alternate plan as well, and though not as generous, the copays would still be so low as to be irrelevant to me, and the annual out of pocket cap would increase by a factor of five to an amount I still don't care about.


Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:46:07 PMI need a third party to help me. Does the US insurance cover all these third-party costs?


Depends on the plan.  Mine does. 

Also, I looked up Duloxetine - I didn't know what it is - and it's a cheap generic.  Without insurance, it would be ~$10/month where I live.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 06, 2020, 01:27:46 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 12:46:07 PM
Fine. Very fine. Lucky you! Are there people less fortunate than you which will have to pay for it significantly more than you?

I do agree.

Now, I am curious. My father can't walk anymore, he needs a wheelchair for going back and forth to and from radiotherapy. I can''t do it alone, I need a third party to help me. Does the US insurance cover all these third-party costs?

If he's over 65, Medicare and supplemental insurance would pay for the wheelchair, unless the doctor screws up the paperwork.  You would probably pay nothing.

Under 65 would vary depending on the insurance plan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:31:48 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 01:08:28 PM
Most people with insurance have to pay more than I do, sometimes a lot more (as in 5-10 times more). 

So much for equality under the law.  ;D

QuoteThe terms of my current coverage are extremely generous.  I do know a very few people with even more generous plans (as in no copays or deductibles), but they are as rare as hen's teeth, and in every case they enjoy legacy plans that are not offered to new employees.  I have access to an alternate plan as well, and though not as generous, the copays would still be so low as to be irrelevant to me, and the annual out of pocket cap would increase by a factor of five to an amount I still don't care about.

This is egotism in a nutshell, yet you claim to subscribe to a Republic. How come?

QuoteI looked up Duloxetine - I didn't know what it is - and it's a cheap generic.  Without insurance, it would be ~$10/month where I live.

It is ~$0()zeroi)/month where I live. Romania 1 --- USA 0.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 01:34:10 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:31:48 PMSo much for equality under the law.  ;D

This is egotism in a nutshell, yet you claim to subscribe to a Republic. How come?


What?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:34:19 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 06, 2020, 01:27:46 PM
If he's over 65, Medicare and supplemental insurance would pay for the wheelchair, unless the doctor screws up the paperwork.  You would probably pay nothing.

He'll turn 80 next January. How many months would I have to wait wait before the payment starts?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:40:06 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 06, 2020, 01:34:10 PM

What?

What do you mean by "a republic"?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 06, 2020, 01:42:22 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:40:06 PM
What do you mean by "a republic"?


Oh, it's one of these.  Pass.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 06, 2020, 01:58:52 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 01:34:19 PM
He'll turn 80 next January. How many months would I have to wait wait before the payment starts?
Don't quite understand the question.
Medicare would pay the supplier directly from the start. You would likely pay nothing at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 02:03:25 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 06, 2020, 01:58:52 PM
Don't quite understand the question.
Medicare would pay the supplier directly from the start. You would likely pay nothing at all.

Would I pay nothing at all, including radiotherapy and transportation to and from home?

Do you mean, zero nada zilch at all?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 06, 2020, 03:34:57 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 02:03:25 PM
Would I pay nothing at all, including radiotherapy and transportation to and from home?

Do you mean, zero nada zilch at all?

I thought you were only talking about the wheelchair. You'd pay nothing for that.
Radiotherapy would probably involve copayments. Transportation might or might not be paid for.
Both of those would depend on exactly what insurance plan you would be using to supplement Medicare--that is, to pay what Medicare itself doesn't pay for.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 06, 2020, 11:29:09 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 06, 2020, 03:34:57 PM
I thought you were only talking about the wheelchair. You'd pay nothing for that.
Radiotherapy would probably involve copayments. Transportation might or might not be paid for.
Both of those would depend on exactly what insurance plan you would be using to supplement Medicare--that is, to pay what Medicare itself doesn't pay for.

Thanks. I pay nothing for radiotherapy. Transportation is not covered.

Now, we''re really way off topic. I'm done with healthcare, for good.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 07, 2020, 08:19:39 AM
Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro has tested positive for coronavirus.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53319517 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53319517)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 07, 2020, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 07, 2020, 08:19:39 AM
Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro has tested positive for coronavirus.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53319517 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53319517)

I guess there is always divine intervention...  ::)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 07, 2020, 09:27:16 AM
WWJD?
(What would Jair do?)
We'll soon find out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 07, 2020, 10:57:34 AM
And yet, the bars are reopening in Rio.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 07, 2020, 11:32:18 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 07, 2020, 09:27:16 AM
WWJD?
(What would Jair do?)
We'll soon find out.

He apparently felt ill on Sunday.
I guess we'll know whether he is in real trouble a bit less than two weeks from now, just like in Johnson's case.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 07, 2020, 05:06:38 PM
This is interesting. Duterte of the Philippines, who I generally equate with Bolsanero and the Orange Swindler, is advocating a much different approach to the coronavirus.

From Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-07/brazil-president-infected-u-s-starts-who-exit-virus-update?srnd=coronavirus):

Duterte Expresses Caution as Philippine Cases Spike (8:40 a.m. HK)

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said he will "have to be very circumspect in reopening the economy" given the recent spike in coronavirus cases.

The firebrand leader said he can't emulate the "devil-may-care attitude" of U.S. President Donald Trump or Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro because the Philippines is poor. "We cannot afford really a total epidemic or pandemonium," he said in an address aired Wednesday.

The Philippines will continue to limit the number of people that can go out, Duterte said, urging residents to be patient. His comments came after Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez and central bank Governor Benjamin Diokno both backed further easing of virus curbs to reignite an economy facing its deepest contraction in three decades.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 07, 2020, 06:21:34 PM
And in my great state...
https://www.newsweek.com/43-florida-icus-reach-capacity-show-no-beds-available-coronavirus-cases-surge-1516006
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 07, 2020, 06:40:38 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 07, 2020, 06:21:34 PM
And in my great state...
https://www.newsweek.com/43-florida-icus-reach-capacity-show-no-beds-available-coronavirus-cases-surge-1516006

Ugh!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 08, 2020, 11:48:27 AM
From (indirectly) the NYT:

Sweden Has Become the World's Cautionary Tale

https://news.yahoo.com/sweden-become-worlds-cautionary-tale-121752098.html

Comparing with Denmark, laissez-faire approach led to much higher COVID death rate but no macroeconomic benefit.
But, reading the last few paras, neither country is comparable economically to the USA because of their universal health care systems.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 08, 2020, 12:45:57 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 08, 2020, 11:48:27 AM
From (indirectly) the NYT:

Sweden Has Become the World's Cautionary Tale

https://news.yahoo.com/sweden-become-worlds-cautionary-tale-121752098.html

Comparing with Denmark, laissez-faire approach led to much higher COVID death rate but no macroeconomic benefit.
But, reading the last few paras, neither country is comparable economically to the USA because of their universal health care systems.

The U.S. problems have little to do with not having UHC

Most of our problems stem from supply lacks.
Not enough tests
Not enough contact tracing
Not enough PPE
Not enough hospital beds for areas with spikes

It does not matter who pays for something if it's not available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 09, 2020, 01:07:05 AM
So fundamentally, everyone is in the same boat in the US states, both rich and poor? That's a bit difficult to believe.


There's now quite a lot of reports on set-backs generally -

- 1 million more infected globally, in just 5 days, the total number reaching 12 mio.
- Melbourne, 5 mio people in quarantine due to outbreak
- Tokyo, an increase again, but maybe due to more testing
- Russia, Brazil, Israel and now parts of India among the countries struggling with high levels of infections
- some developments in the US not looking good, reports say
- Trump's Tulsa rally 'more than likely' boosted outbreak there https://apnews.com/ad96548245e186382225818d8dc416eb
- Sweden, more critique coming up - about 1/3 of fatalities were in loneliness, mainly due to safety measures and a lack of resources, and 40 municipalities have managed things badly, a report says.

  In my country, Denmark, the situation has been good for quite a few days, with 0-1 fatalities and 10-30 registered new infections per day, only 18 hospitalized and 5 people in intensive care, with 609 total fatalities. This from a population of 5.6 mio.
  It is not certain that the positive, local trend will continue though, given the holiday flux and tendencies abroad. 930,000 have been tested, which is a comparatively high number, and only 13,000 were registered as infected.
  To the best of my knowledge, all corona treatment is free here, except perhaps some easily obtained supplementary medicine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 06:49:35 AM
An encouraging item:

ICU Ward at Heart of Italy Outbreak Now Virus-Free: ABC (9 a.m. NY)
The main hospital in Bergamo, one of Italy's hardest-hit cities in the pandemic, had its first day without any COVID-19 patients in intensive care, according to ABC News, which cited a spokesperson for the Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital.


Meanwhile, American exceptionalism thrives...per the BBC (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53337483):

The US state of Arizona, for instance, is currently registering as many new cases of coronavirus as the entire European Union, which has a population 60 times greater.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 09, 2020, 08:01:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clscC120ZQM

I don't know if anyone watches bald and bankrupt, but he made a video today about how he spent the last month nearly dying from covid.

BTW his channel is awesome, his earlier days are travel in India and his recent stuff is east europe/Russia, mostly visiting small towns and old Soviet stuff.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 09:37:39 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 08, 2020, 12:45:57 PM
The U.S. problems have little to do with not having UHC

Most of our problems stem from supply lacks.
Not enough tests
Not enough contact tracing
Not enough PPE
Not enough hospital beds for areas with spikes

It does not matter who pays for something if it's not available.

     That's strictly true. I would only observe that Somethingcare-for-all would be consistent with strong public health generally. The same politicians who have wrecked the virus response are in court to destroy OCare and have signaled very strongly that they have no interest in replacing it with anything. If they lose power I think it's likely that critical supplies will be a priority not only for this crisis but future ones.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 10:12:37 AM

     I have an oximeter. It says I have lots of oxi.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 09, 2020, 10:20:45 AM
You remind me, I haven't yet taken today's moximeter reading.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 09, 2020, 12:11:27 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 09:37:39 AM
     That's strictly true. I would only observe that Somethingcare-for-all would be consistent with strong public health generally. The same politicians who have wrecked the virus response are in court to destroy OCare and have signaled very strongly that they have no interest in replacing it with anything. If they lose power I think it's likely that critical supplies will be a priority not only for this crisis but future ones.

It's a magnificent argument  against SomethingcareForAll.
Eventually the GOP will  come back into power. Imagine  all the harm they could do to health care if SomethingcareForAll was in place when they do,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 01:29:49 PM
Is the GOP in Florida suppressing COVID-19 infection data?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-sheriff-wins-battle-with-de-santis-administration-over-coronavirus-data-174305203.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 04:00:39 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 01:29:49 PM
Is the GOP in Florida suppressing COVID-19 infection data?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-sheriff-wins-battle-with-de-santis-administration-over-coronavirus-data-174305203.html

     Yes, the Health Dept.employee who created the state virus dashboard was fired because she refused to manipulate the data. She says many cases have been deleted from the records to make the numbers look better. What strikes me is how Trumpists think they can get away with such shenanigans since everyone is looking for them to pull stunts like this. They do it anyway, but......why? What possible advantage could they get from it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 04:13:02 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 09, 2020, 12:11:27 PM
It's a magnificent argument  against SomethingcareForAll.
Eventually the GOP will  come back into power. Imagine  all the harm they could do to health care if SomethingcareForAll was in place when they do,

     No, it's not. It's an argument for a program Repubs can't easily destroy. By building it on a solid foundation (like, for example, Medicare) you make it as Repub proof as it's possible to make it. Another advantage is consolidation of the program takes advantage of the greater efficiency of public programs over private ones. The overhead is very low for SS/Medicare/Medicaid compared to the now withering private employee based system. Also, they improve over time, because politicians have an incentive to improve programs that cover everyone much more than separate programs designed for the poor class.

     My Medicare is improving. The dental coverage just got a boost. This will continue to happen, because many people want it, and they are not just poor people who have no power.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 09, 2020, 04:18:49 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 04:00:39 PM
     Yes, the Health Dept.employee who created the state virus dashboard was fired because she refused to manipulate the data. She says many cases have been deleted from the records to make the numbers look better. What strikes me is how Trumpists think they can get away with such shenanigans since everyone is looking for them to pull stunts like this. They do it anyway, but......why? What possible advantage could they get from it?

Because even if caught, no one will be able to figure out what the original figures were.

Specific to Florida, despite being a epitome of a swing state, the GOP has dominated state politics for over two decades. The only Democrat holding statewide office is the Commissioner of Agriculture. In the legislature the GOP holds 73 out of 120 seats in the state House of Representatives. It's not quite so dominant in the state Senate: 23 out of 40.
So DeSantis doesn't have to worry about the legislature opposing him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 09, 2020, 04:24:37 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 09, 2020, 04:13:02 PM
     No, it's not. It's an argument for a program Repubs can't easily destroy. By building it on a solid foundation (like, for example, Medicare) you make it as Repub proof as it's possible to make it. Another advantage is consolidation of the program takes advantage of the greater efficiency of public programs over private ones. The overhead is very low for SS/Medicare/Medicaid compared to the now withering private employee based system. Also, they improve over time, because politicians have an incentive to improve programs that cover everyone much more than separate programs designed for the poor class.

     My Medicare is improving. The dental coverage just got a boost. This will continue to happen, because many people want it, and they are not just poor people who have no power.

   

Having been my mother's caretaker for so many years, your belief in Medicare's efficiency can only make me laugh.

I can best put the reality of Medicare into the wish that you stay healthy for many more years. Because Medicare is very inefficient for any patient who is not in relative good health.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 04:56:08 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 09, 2020, 04:18:49 PM
Because even if caught, no one will be able to figure out what the original figures were.

Specific to Florida, despite being a epitome of a swing state, the GOP has dominated state politics for over two decades. The only Democrat holding statewide office is the Commissioner of Agriculture. In the legislature the GOP holds 73 out of 120 seats in the state House of Representatives. It's not quite so dominant in the state Senate: 23 out of 40.
So DeSantis doesn't have to worry about the legislature opposing him.

But golly gee whiz,  :o aren't there any elected Floridian Republicans with principles or ethics, who believe that the public deserves to know the truth about a life-threatening public health crisis? Isn't that what "public servants" are for?

:laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

OK, forget it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 09, 2020, 06:10:07 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 04:56:08 PM
But golly gee whiz,  :o aren't there any elected Floridian Republicans with principles or ethics, who believe that the public deserves to know the truth about a life-threatening public health crisis? Isn't that what "public servants" are for?

:laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

OK, forget it.

There's at least one...the sheriff in the story you posted earlier.

And Rick Wilson, although I guess he does not qualify as GOP anymore.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 10, 2020, 06:05:07 AM
26 Mississippi legislators have tested positive for Covid-19, officials say

https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-07-08-20-intl/h_2ccc0229b82992fe872260e59d821850

From other stories, one can find that the positive tests occurred

after working for weeks in a Capitol where many people stood or sat close together and did not wear masks.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 02:42:03 PM
Touting criticized study, White House presses FDA to authorize hydroxychloroquine — again
Trade adviser Peter Navarro leads the effort with support from Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president's lawyer, and Laura Ingraham's show on Fox News. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/10/peter-navarro-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus/)

[...]"Navarro says his goal is simple: At a time when the virus is surging in many parts of the country, there are 60 million doses of hydroxychloroquine in the Strategic National Stockpile that can't be distributed unless the FDA issues an emergency authorization. He asserted the Henry Ford study shows the drug works when used as an early treatment and said the FDA should take action "within days, weeks or months" so he could send the shipments."[...]

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 10, 2020, 03:00:29 PM
So a trade advisor and a moronic Faux News Teleprompter reader (who fails to heed her own "Shut up and dribble" advice  :D) have been proclaimed national health advisors! How brilliant.  :laugh:

But under the WWJD? (What would Jair do?) principle, the decision is a no-brainer!  Jair's the poster boy for hydroxychloroquine!
https://apnews.com/66a86e4cccf4e94ea75a8eedd92afeb3 (https://apnews.com/66a86e4cccf4e94ea75a8eedd92afeb3)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 03:18:07 PM
But sixty million stockpiled? Who signs off on that? With what oversight? I assume they haven't stockpiled every other problematic drug under trial, just the one the thugs either have a financial stake in or where they can't admit their all-in fingers-crossed don't-make-me-read-science advocacy of an early miracle-cure was perhaps a little hasty.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 10, 2020, 03:55:48 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 03:18:07 PM
But sixty million stockpiled? Who signs off on that? With what oversight? I assume they haven't stockpiled every other problematic drug under trial, just the one the thugs either have a financial stake in or where they can't admit their all-in fingers-crossed don't-make-me-read-science advocacy of an early miracle-cure was perhaps a little hasty.
Exactly.
GOP don't believe in oversight, it was surely done on the Orange Swindler's whim. I'd be dumbfounded if the OS's family has no financial stake in this deal.*

Plus, to quote the article cited,

said Paulo Calmon, a political science professor at the University of Brasilia. "Chloroquine composes part of the denialist's political strategy, with the objective of convincing voters that the pandemic's effects can be easily controlled."

*You ain't seen nothing yet. Wait until the forthcoming "October Surprise", when the putative vaccines are announced. I guarantee the Orange Swindler, Kushner and their ilk will own financial stakes in all of the announced "leading pack" of biotech firms. Products probably won't work worth a damn, but King Grifter will profit huugely.  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 10, 2020, 04:21:22 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 03:18:07 PM
But sixty million stockpiled? Who signs off on that? With what oversight? I assume they haven't stockpiled every other problematic drug under trial, just the one the thugs either have a financial stake in or where they can't admit their all-in fingers-crossed don't-make-me-read-science advocacy of an early miracle-cure was perhaps a little hasty.

It's more likely, given the source, that the 60 million figure is an overstatement by an order of magnitude or so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 04:28:21 PM
You mean Navarro? Or the authors of the article or the WP?

Even if it were  6 million or 600,000 I wouldn't understand why they would stockpile something shown to be ineffective and/or dangerous after far more attention and scrutiny than any other drug, except to give a lucrative contract to a favored business.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 10, 2020, 04:35:40 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 10, 2020, 04:28:21 PM
You mean Navarro? Or the authors of the article or the WP?

Even if it were  6 million or 600,000 I wouldn't understand why they would stockpile something shown to be ineffective and/or dangerous after far more attention and scrutiny than any other drug, except to give a lucrative contract to a favored business.

Navarro.
I'm sure someone in Trumpworld will serve as broker.  Maybe Roger Stone, since he doesn't have to worry about prison any more.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 11, 2020, 10:10:24 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/dozens-us-marines-japans-okinawa-114553528.html

TOKYO (AP) — Dozens of U.S. Marines at two bases on the southern Japanese island of Okinawa have been infected with the coronavirus in what is feared to be a massive outbreak, Okinawa's governor said Saturday, demanding an adequate explanation from the U.S. military.

Gov. Denny Tamaki said he could say only that a "few dozen" cases had been found recently because the U.S. military asked that the exact figure not be released. The outbreaks occurred at Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which is at the center of a relocation dispute, and Camp Hansen, Tamaki said.

Local media, citing unnamed sources, said about 60 people had been infected.

"Okinawans are shocked by what we were told (by the U.S. military)," Tamaki told a news conference. "We now have strong doubts that the U.S. military has taken adequate disease prevention measures."


[Emphasis added] No shit, Sherlock.
Just ask ex-Capt. Brett Crozier.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/magazine/navy-captain-crozier-positive-coronavirus.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 11, 2020, 02:53:01 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 09, 2020, 04:24:37 PM
Having been my mother's caretaker for so many years, your belief in Medicare's efficiency can only make me laugh.

I can best put the reality of Medicare into the wish that you stay healthy for many more years. Because Medicare is very inefficient for any patient who is not in relative good health.

     It's efficient at producing the benefits it provides. Inefficiency is not the reason it doesn't work well for everyone who needs it.

     We need better public health. The best way to get it is to cover the whole population with a program that is designed to be good enough for everyone. That means me, you, and our families. It shouldn't be a crap shoot or a stroke of good luck. It shouldn't be denied to the "undeserving" class. There shouldn't be an undeserving class. It does no good for the rest of us to have one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 11, 2020, 04:30:34 PM
A 37-year-old Ohio man died from coronavirus after slamming 'hype' over pandemic on Facebook

https://www.insider.com/ohio-man-veteran-died-coronavirus-mask-facebook-posts-2020-7

This lurid story has gotten a lot of attention. I was highly sceptical, but it seems true: there are many corroborating links including local newspaper stories and obituaries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 11, 2020, 04:44:45 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 11, 2020, 02:53:01 PM
     It's efficient at producing the benefits it provides. Inefficiency is not the reason it doesn't work well for everyone who needs it.

     We need better public health. The best way to get it is to cover the whole population with a program that is designed to be good enough for everyone. That means me, you, and our families. It shouldn't be a crap shoot or a stroke of good luck. It shouldn't be denied to the "undeserving" class. There shouldn't be an undeserving class. It does no good for the rest of us to have one.

It's efficient at giving minimal care to those that need nothing more than minimal care.
It's inefficient at giving more than minimal care to anyone who needs more than minimal care. And the more care that is needed, the more inefficient it becomes.

And these inefficiencies are baked into its structure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 11, 2020, 04:47:23 PM
Another tragic story:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/patient-dies-after-going-to-covid-party-thought-it-was-a-hoax-official/ar-BB16CCy8?ocid=msedgdhp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 12, 2020, 12:48:29 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on July 11, 2020, 04:47:23 PM
Another tragic story:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/patient-dies-after-going-to-covid-party-thought-it-was-a-hoax-official/ar-BB16CCy8?ocid=msedgdhp

By purposely contracting the virus, even if you don't get very ill yourself, you might sign someone else's death warrant....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 12, 2020, 12:56:40 AM
There was a true story in the early stages of the virus about a hospital doctor and a local politician in Sweden, who went to Stockholm just to contract the virus. They wanted to be infected at the early stages to be able to work better later on. He decided to lick the metro's escalators there, she did something similar, but none were infected. The acts were condemned by their colleagues as irresponsible.

https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/samhalle/a/Qob1Wq/lakare-akte-till-stockholm-for-att-smittas--utreds-av-sjukhuset
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 12, 2020, 04:26:42 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on July 11, 2020, 04:47:23 PM
Another tragic story:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/patient-dies-after-going-to-covid-party-thought-it-was-a-hoax-official/ar-BB16CCy8?ocid=msedgdhp

And the Darwin prize goes to...

These are sad stories, but for all the negative aspects Covid-19 might have the positive effect of being a wake-up call to the culture of ignorance and stupidity. Covid-19 seems to attack idiocracy effectively while smarter societies deal with it better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 12, 2020, 04:40:53 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 11, 2020, 04:44:45 PM
It's efficient at giving minimal care to those that need nothing more than minimal care.

Sounds logical.

Quote from: JBS on July 11, 2020, 04:44:45 PMIt's inefficient at giving more than minimal care to anyone who needs more than minimal care.

This doesn't sound logical. If someone needs more than minimal care, obviously more than minimal care is needed by definition.  ::)

Quote from: JBS on July 11, 2020, 04:44:45 PMAnd the more care that is needed, the more inefficient it becomes.

Yeah, but preventative care reduces need for more intense care later and is efficient. Cuba's healthcare system is a prime example of this and how they can provide surpringly good healthcare to their people with little resources being a relatively poor country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 12, 2020, 05:33:59 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 09, 2020, 04:56:08 PM
But golly gee whiz,  :o aren't there any elected Floridian Republicans with principles or ethics, who believe that the public deserves to know the truth about a life-threatening public health crisis? Isn't that what "public servants" are for?

:laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

OK, forget it.

In the Trump era?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 12, 2020, 07:54:20 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 12, 2020, 04:26:42 AM
And the Darwin prize goes to...

These are sad stories, but for all the negative aspects Covid-19 might have the positive effect of being a wake-up call to the culture of ignorance and stupidity. Covid-19 seems to attack idiocracy effectively while smarter societies deal with it better.

Nice thought, but as a resident of the nation that is the veritable Mecca  :P  :D of idiocracy and the culture you describe, I fear it's a pipe dream.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 07:57:01 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 11, 2020, 04:44:45 PM
It's efficient at giving minimal care to those that need nothing more than minimal care.
It's inefficient at giving more than minimal care to anyone who needs more than minimal care. And the more care that is needed, the more inefficient it becomes.

And these inefficiencies are baked into its structure.

     That is not an efficiency problem. It's a decision not to provide certain kinds of care. We decide what's baked in or not when we vote for politicians who support public health measures, or those who want to "reform" them down to a minimum. If you want more coverage, fight for it. You probably won't get everything you want, but you will get more than you have.

     Or, you can hope your private sector choice still exists next year or the year after. Maybe you'll be lucky and it will. Maybe it will be too expensive, or cover less than it does now. OCare could die, or be murdered to be more precise. I think we need a more bullet proof option.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 08:06:46 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 07:57:01 AM
     That is not an efficiency problem. It's a decision not to provide certain kinds of care. We decide what's baked in or not when we vote for politicians who support public health measures, or those who want to "reform" them down to a minimum. If you want more coverage, fight for it. You probably won't get everything you want, but you will get more than you have.

     Or, you can hope your private sector choice still exists next year or the year after. Maybe you'll be lucky and it will. Maybe it will be too expensive, or cover less than it does now. OCare could die, or be murdered to be more precise. I think we need a more bullet proof option.

You're not talking about what I am talking about.

Medicare is a bureaucratic mess. The more an individual needs services provided through Medicare, the messier and more inefficient it becomes.  You are relatively healthy, so you haven't directly experienced that mess yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 08:07:11 AM
     If you like private plans, you can support including them in the SomethingCare package. I'd go for that. You could have a tiered system going from a zero additional premium like some of the Medicare Advantage plans (mine is like that) up to no network plans with various options included.

     I stay in network to take advantage of the zero premium. If I wanted more I'd pay for it. I might want that later.

     The pandemic has revealed how stupid it was to be the last wealthy country to neglect the health of its citizens through cost rationing and the private insurance lottery.

Quote from: JBS on July 12, 2020, 08:06:46 AM
You're not talking about what I am talking about.

Medicare is a bureaucratic mess. The more an individual needs services provided through Medicare, the messier and more inefficient it becomes.  You are relatively healthy, so you haven't directly experienced that mess yet.

     That's all the more reason then to support improvements. You have no other direction to go but up. I'm not doubting that Medicare has the deficiencies you say it has, I'm pointing out that they are there because pro healthcare politicians are kept on the defensive trying to keep the sociopaths from destroying what we have.

     The IRS is an example of an organization that is rendered artificially "inefficient" by enemy action. Repubs don't care that tax rates might actually be higher because of how they crippled the tax service. It's the same everywhere, you govern badly then claim government is bad.

     Medicare will only function better if you make it a goal. Being a passive witness to how bad it is won't help anyone. What better option is there? What's the plan, Stan?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 08:14:32 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 08:07:11 AM
     If you like private plans, you can support including them in the SomethingCare package. I'd go for that. You could have a tiered system going from a zero additional premium like some of the Medicare Advantage plans (mine is like that) up to no network plans with various options included.

     I stay in network to take advantage of the zero premium. If I wanted more I'd pay for it. I might want that later.

     The pandemic has revealed how stupid it was to be the last wealthy country to neglect the health of its citizens through cost rationing and the private insurance lottery.

The last paragraph has no contact to reality.  The entire post has no relevance to the point I was making.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 08:24:45 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 12, 2020, 08:14:32 AM
The last paragraph has no contact to reality.  The entire post has no relevance to the point I was making.

     You were discussing how hard it is to get more than basic services through Medicare. I have no doubt this is true. So, what are you going to do about it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 12, 2020, 01:07:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/12/white-house-seeks-to-discredit-dr-anthony-fauci-as-coronavirus-surges.html

I shudder to think what kind of knuckle-dragger will replace him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 01:24:16 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 12, 2020, 08:24:45 AM
     You were discussing how hard it is to get more than basic services through Medicare. I have no doubt this is true. So, what are you going to do about it?

This tangent started off with you  claiming Medicare  was efficient. Now you agree that it's not.   

As to your final question: there is no "good" alternative. You can choose a system that gives everyone mediocre care with high levels of bureaucratic inefficiency, or a system that delivers high quality care to some  people but poor care or no care to everyone else.  There are no real world alternatives other than those two.

BTW, given the ability of the IRS to arbitrarily destroy people's lives through audits and enforcement proceedings, an inefficient IRS [and it's been inefficient for several decades] is a very good thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 03:03:33 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 12, 2020, 01:24:16 PM
This tangent started off with you  claiming Medicare  was efficient. Now you agree that it's not.   

The "efficiency" you seem to be talking is some kind of consumer satisfaction.  In that case, concierge medicine is probably the most "efficent".  That's not what is meant by efficiency in this context where it means lowest overhead for the best medical outcomes overall. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 03:53:30 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 03:03:33 PM
The "efficiency" you seem to be talking is some kind of consumer satisfaction.  In that case, concierge medicine is probably the most "efficent".  That's not what is meant by efficiency in this context where it means lowest overhead for the best medical outcomes overall.

My definition of efficiency is patients getting the care they need with the least interference of bureaucratic paperwork. Cost has nothing to do with it.  It involves wait times for MD visits and procedures and tests, pre-approvals for operations, durable equipment, procedures, prescription medicine, etc.

If you wish to call that customer satisfaction, be my guest.  My experience with my mother showed me that while the program aims for low costs,  it prioritizes getting the paperwork in order over good medical outcomes.  That's why I call it inefficient.

What Drogulus means by efficiency, I am not sure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 04:35:19 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 12, 2020, 03:53:30 PM
My definition of efficiency is patients getting the care they need with the least interference of bureaucratic paperwork. Cost has nothing to do with it.  It involves wait times for MD visits and procedures and tests, pre-approvals for operations, durable equipment, procedures, prescription medicine, etc.

If you wish to call that customer satisfaction, be my guest.  My experience with my mother showed me that while the program aims for low costs,  it prioritizes getting the paperwork in order over good medical outcomes.  That's why I call it inefficient.

What Drogulus means by efficiency, I am not sure.

It's not a good argument (even with added huffiness) for a status quo that leaves millions of people without access to healthcare.  And the bureaucracy argument ignores the reality of dealing with insurance companies.  Actually, I'm not sure what you are arguing for, unless it's some kind of glibertarian fantasy world where where the free market magically provides affordable healthcare for everyone. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 06:42:02 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 04:35:19 PM
It's not a good argument (even with added huffiness) for a status quo that leaves millions of people without access to healthcare.  And the bureaucracy argument ignores the reality of dealing with insurance companies.  Actually, I'm not sure what you are arguing for, unless it's some kind of glibertarian fantasy world where where the free market magically provides affordable healthcare for everyone.

Did I say private insurance was less bureaucratic? I did not, because they can be just as bad.

I am arguing against the progressive fantasy that if we just open up the government checkbook wide enough, we can provide everyone with good quality healthcare. We can provide everyone with poor to mediocre health care, but that's it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 12, 2020, 06:45:53 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 12, 2020, 01:07:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/12/white-house-seeks-to-discredit-dr-anthony-fauci-as-coronavirus-surges.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/12/white-house-seeks-to-discredit-dr-anthony-fauci-as-coronavirus-surges.html)

I shudder to think what kind of knuckle-dragger will replace him.

All part of suppressing professional medical opinion, to cover up the incompetence of the President.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 07:38:18 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 12, 2020, 06:42:02 PM
Did I say private insurance was less bureaucratic? I did not, because they can be just as bad.

I am arguing against the progressive fantasy that if we just open up the government checkbook wide enough, we can provide everyone with good quality healthcare. We can provide everyone with poor to mediocre health care, but that's it.

Except it's not a fantasy but the reality in most of the developed world. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 12, 2020, 07:58:10 PM
Quote from: Daverz on July 12, 2020, 07:38:18 PM
Except it's not a fantasy but the reality in most of the developed world.

Most health care in the developed world can be described as mediocre.

Don't forget that all those statistics which say US health outcomes are not as good as that in other countries don't take into account the fact that we in the U.S. have four different systems: Medicare, Medicaid, the VA, and private insurance.  I've looked for, but never found, any comparison of outcomes among those four. Anecdotally Medicaid seems the worst, but I've never seen anything more than anecdotal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 07:41:54 AM
I have decided to continue my self-quarantine as the county I live in has 3,813 cases. The surrounding counties, which are closer to Atlanta definitely aren't improving either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 13, 2020, 08:11:10 AM
This is quite interesting - a large, international group of super-rich appeal for governments to have the economical elites paying higher taxes on a permanent basis, for the societies to recover in general and reduce poverty (there's a least one in the group from my country too, local press here says).

Obviously, there are also cases, where the crisis has made some people considerably richer, Jeff Bezos of Amazon probably being the most published example.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2020/jul/13/super-rich-call-for-higher-taxes-on-wealthy-to-pay-for-covid-19-recovery

One comment says:
"This has been necessary for a long time but if it's going to happen, the world needs to dismantle it's tax havens and punish tax avoidance."
https://twitter.com/Henry_Langston/status/1282615982708658176
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 13, 2020, 09:23:25 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53392817

Coronavirus: White House targets US disease chief Dr Anthony Fauci

Donald Trump has often railed against newspapers that publish anonymous quotes from administration aides critical of the president. Over the weekend, however, the White House was using its own unnamed "officials" in a remarkable attack on a member of its coronavirus task force, top infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci.

The White House even provided a list of Fauci's old statements about the virus similar to the kind of memo a campaign might use to direct negative attention on a political opponent. The administration, it appears, is trying to paint Fauci as wrong about the early threat of the virus and, consequently, untrustworthy when he questions the administration's current analysis of the current situation and its planned actions.

As if that wasn't enough, on Monday morning the president retweeted a post by former game show host Chuck Woolery, accusing the Centers for Disease Control, among others, of lying about the virus in an effort to undermine the Trump's re-election prospects.

An administration at war with its own scientific and medical experts in the middle of a pandemic that is once again on the upswing makes developing a cohesive strategy - one that the public trusts and will follow - challenging, to say the least.


Former game show host! The Game Show President should fire Fauci and appoint Woolery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 13, 2020, 10:31:34 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 12, 2020, 01:07:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/12/white-house-seeks-to-discredit-dr-anthony-fauci-as-coronavirus-surges.html

I shudder to think what kind of knuckle-dragger will replace him.

it will be interesting to see if Trump will be as stupid as to try and fire Fauci before the election.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 13, 2020, 10:33:43 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 07:41:54 AM
I have decided to continue my self-quarantine as the county I live in has 3,813 cases. The surrounding counties, which are closer to Atlanta definitely aren't improving either.

Good on you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 10:38:57 AM
Quote from: Herman on July 13, 2020, 10:33:43 AM
Good on you.

Thanks and I don't like getting political, but I think Trump's handling of this pandemic has been destructive to say the least. The fact that he shrugged off the virus as far back as January when he and other officials were being briefed on it has proven to be his undoing and, in turn, his approval rating is the lowest it has ever been. Now, on top of this destruction, you have an even larger racial divide than this country has ever seen in recent years. These are all the ingredients of a one-term president. I don't think he'll pull himself out of this slump. What he should've done back in March before this pandemic launched into full effect here in the US was issue a nationwide lockdown and implement strict social distancing guidelines, travel bans and actually listen to his health experts. Now, he's acting like the virus doesn't even exist and nothing is wrong. I was a supporter of his presidency in the beginning as I was hoping for greater economic stability, but it seems that the economy is the only thing he cares about and there's thousands and thousands of people dying of this horrible virus. I'm sorry, but I just can't support this level of incompetence any longer. Also, while he cares only about the economy, this has actually wound up hurting him because of the pandemic as restaurants have closed, bars have closed, sports teams face uncertain futures (and let's face it sports do bring in revenue for cities), etc. With millions of people out-of-work, it doesn't look like even his alleged 'political strength' is helping him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 13, 2020, 12:44:56 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 07:41:54 AM
I have decided to continue my self-quarantine as the county I live in has 3,813 cases. The surrounding counties, which are closer to Atlanta definitely aren't improving either.

Stay safe, John!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 12:47:29 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 13, 2020, 12:44:56 PM
Stay safe, John!

Thank you, Karl. You, too. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 13, 2020, 01:17:02 PM
12 states, plus D.C. and Virgin Islands, see sharp rise in the average number of new cases in the past week

And:

Mass. reports 154 new confirmed coronavirus cases, 5 new deaths
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on July 13, 2020, 06:00:22 PM
Quote from: Dowder on July 13, 2020, 05:40:58 PM
If you're willing to blame one guy for all the deaths will you credit him for those who didn't get it or those who did but recovered? (Supposedly less than one percent die from COVID-19 now.)

However, if he shuts down everything he wrecks the economy sooner than later and his critics will fault him for it because that's how polarized our politics is now. The Left campaigns on "it's the economy stupid" or it's "look at all those dead people!" The fact that state and local governments had an impact and made critical decisions isn't relevant as the fact of federalism is hardly relevant anymore, especially in an election year. 

Anyhoo, you might want to examine the actions from the federal and various state and local governments and apply a little judicious criticism or praise for the handling of the virus. Blaming or criticizing one person for everything is unfair. Just a thought.

Neither Left nor Right, although most Wingnuts will go for one or the other... 

So anyhoo (neat word, I'll have to remember that), this talk about 1%, you do realize that it is intended to minimize things because people don't cope well with big numbers. So here is some context for it:

(https://i.imgur.com/EyP8Sw3.jpg)

For those of you who CAN deal with big numbers, let this sink in. Then next time someone says "it's one percent, got over it", you can see where they are coming from.

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 13, 2020, 06:19:20 PM
Quote from: Dowder on July 13, 2020, 06:15:15 PM
What a distortion of facts and a false scenario to drum up as much fear as possible. Here are the numbers, according to Johns Hopkins for the US:

41,002,876 have been tested.

3,361,042 are confirmed.

135,582 deaths.

So, you can see that most Americans don't have it (roughly 38 million out of the 41 million tested). Recovery only applies to those infected, not a percentage of the entire US population. Not saying there aren't real side effects from infection but age and pre-existing conditions have the most impact usually for those patients with them, the ones we should be prioritizing. If wrecking an entire economy is your way of doing that, we'll have to disagree.

8)

Most Americans don't have it yet.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 13, 2020, 06:21:18 PM
It isn't realistic or fair, to blame all 135K deaths on Trump. But it is both realistic and fair to own that thousands of Americans now dead would probably not have died, but for Trump's criminal negligence and incompetence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 06:30:00 PM
Quote from: Dowder on July 13, 2020, 05:40:58 PM
If you're willing to blame one guy for all the deaths will you credit him for those who didn't get it or those who did but recovered? (Supposedly less than one percent die from COVID-19 now.)

However, if he shuts down everything he wrecks the economy sooner than later and his critics will fault him for it because that's how polarized our politics is now. The Left campaigns on "it's the economy stupid" or it's "look at all those dead people!" The fact that state and local governments had an impact and made critical decisions isn't relevant as the fact of federalism is hardly relevant anymore, especially in an election year. 

Anyhoo, you might want to examine the actions from the federal and various state and local governments and apply a little judicious criticism or praise for the handling of the virus. Blaming or criticizing one person for everything is unfair. Just a thought.

The economy wouldn't have tanked had he implemented better measures to ensure that the virus didn't spread. You ever hear of an executive order? Anyway, I find it fascinating how people, like yourself, will defend his actions or, in this case, his inaction and quickly move on to prove some kind of political point that was irrelevant to the point I was making. The point being is he had advance knowledge of the virus and did nothing about it --- in fact, he fluffed it off like it wasn't a big deal. Well, now look at our current situation. Would we be in our current situation had those measures I mentioned in my post above been implemented? And, also, I never mentioned anything about shutting down the economy. Grocery stores, pharmacies and clinics/hospitals would be left open. The fact is Trump pushed for the economy to open back up too soon like he could flick a light switch and the virus would be gone. Now, he's pushing for schools to open back up, is he out of his mind? You want a COVID party? Go open up a school and tell all the kids they have to be there and see what happens.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on July 13, 2020, 06:32:46 PM
Quote from: Dowder on July 13, 2020, 06:15:15 PM
What a distortion of facts and a false scenario to drum up as much fear as possible. Here are the numbers, according to Johns Hopkins for the US:

41,002,876 have been tested.

3,361,042 are confirmed.

135,582 deaths.

So, you can see that most Americans don't have it (roughly 38 million out of the 41 million tested). Recovery only applies to those infected, not a percentage of the entire US population. Not saying there aren't real side effects from infection but age and pre-existing conditions have the most impact usually for those patients with them, the ones we should be prioritizing. If wrecking an entire economy is your way of doing that, we'll have to disagree.

8)

No distortion whatsoever. FYI, most medical experts agree that there are 10 cases for every positive test. In addition, the numbers used are based on the actual ratios of deaths to disabilities. We would certainly like to believe that not everyone is going to get it, so yes, this is a worst-case scenario. However, I would certainly appreciate it if you would enlighten me about what will STOP everyone from eventually getting it? It hasn't been slowed or stopped yet, and we are doing (mostly) nothing to change that. Florida had more than 15,000 new cases yesterday. Using the number we both agree on (1% death rate), that's 150 (153, actually) who are going to die in a few weeks. So let's not even count the disabled ones. Screw 'em.

Could we stop it if we had some leadership? Spain, and even Italy did. In fact, every country except us has.

I'm not even talking about T***p, here, how about Ted F**king Cruz hopping on an American Airlines plane yesterday and refusing to put on a mask. How about those 125 people who were at his mercy if he actually has it? What kind of leadership is that? It's no wonder we can't get a trend in the right direction on this: the only ones doing the right thing are the freaking Libtards, and who wants to do what they do? It wouldn't be the American Way!

Damn right we'll have to disagree. This is not a political thing. Is the virus taking sides? T***p says the virus is making him look bad. Dude, you ARE bad! 

Frankly I'm getting sick of this shit. I retired 7 months ago and have been off my property 3 times since then. And all because a significant cadre of assholes can't get their stuff all in one pile. We love to speak well of ourselves, but actions at a time like this speak a hell of a lot louder than words. >:(

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 06:37:59 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on July 13, 2020, 06:32:46 PM
No distortion whatsoever. FYI, most medical experts agree that there are 10 cases for every positive test. In addition, the numbers used are based on the actual ratios of deaths to disabilities. We would certainly like to believe that not everyone is going to get it, so yes, this is a worst-case scenario. However, I would certainly appreciate it if you would enlighten me about what will STOP everyone from eventually getting it? It hasn't been slowed or stopped yet, and we are doing (mostly) nothing to change that. Florida had more than 15,000 new cases yesterday. Using the number we both agree on (1% death rate), that's 150 (153, actually) who are going to die in a few weeks. So let's not even count the disabled ones. Screw 'em.

Could we stop it if we had some leadership? Spain, and even Italy did. In fact, every country except us has.

I'm not even talking about T***p, here, how about Ted F**king Cruz hopping on an American Airlines plane yesterday and refusing to put on a mask. How about those 125 people who were at his mercy if he actually has it? What kind of leadership is that? It's no wonder we can't get a trend in the right direction on this: the only ones doing the right thing are the freaking Libtards, and who wants to do what they do? It wouldn't be the American Way!

Damn right we'll have to disagree. This is not a political thing. Is the virus taking sides? T***p says the virus is making him look bad. Dude, you ARE bad! 

Frankly I'm getting sick of this shit. I retired 7 months ago and have been off my property 3 times since then. And all because a significant cadre of assholes can't get their stuff all in one pile. We love to speak well of ourselves, but actions at a time like this speak a hell of a lot louder than words. >:(

8)

Can I get an amen? AMEN!!! Well said, sir. 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 13, 2020, 10:03:52 PM
Quote from: Dowder on July 13, 2020, 06:15:15 PM
What a distortion of facts and a false scenario to drum up as much fear as possible. Here are the numbers, according to Johns Hopkins for the US:

41,002,876 have been tested.

3,361,042 are confirmed.

135,582 deaths.

So, you can see that most Americans don't have it (roughly 38 million out of the 41 million tested). Recovery only applies to those infected, not a percentage of the entire US population. Not saying there aren't real side effects from infection but age and pre-existing conditions have the most impact usually for those patients with them, the ones we should be prioritizing. If wrecking an entire economy is your way of doing that, we'll have to disagree.

8)

I was going to respond to this inane remark but I really do not have to.  There have been some excellent responses.

I will make an observation my wife made.  The main people who are in danger if we prematurely reopen the schools are the teachers.  A child may be a carrier who will infect others who are at risk.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 13, 2020, 10:28:27 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 13, 2020, 06:21:18 PM
It isn't realistic or fair, to blame all 135K deaths on Trump. But it is both realistic and fair to own that thousands of Americans now dead would probably not have died, but for Trump's criminal negligence and incompetence.
As an outsider this rings pretty true to me. There is IMO enough incompetence and poor leadership over here (UK) but not, perhaps, quite at this level.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 14, 2020, 12:05:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 13, 2020, 06:21:18 PM
It isn't realistic or fair, to blame all 135K deaths on Trump. But it is both realistic and fair to own that thousands of Americans now dead would probably not have died, but for Trump's criminal negligence and incompetence.

It is not just Trump.  The millions of Americans who still think this a hoax or they are immune are equally responsible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 14, 2020, 02:01:11 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on July 14, 2020, 12:05:25 AM
It is not just Trump.  The millions of Americans who still hink this a hoax or they are immune are equally responsible.
Good point though depressing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 14, 2020, 02:16:24 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on July 14, 2020, 12:05:25 AM
It is not just Trump.  The millions of Americans who still hink this a hoax or they are immune are equally responsible.

Part of a president's thankless job is telling people the truth in times of emergency.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 02:37:17 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 13, 2020, 07:41:54 AM
I have decided to continue my self-quarantine as the county I live in has 3,813 cases. The surrounding counties, which are closer to Atlanta definitely aren't improving either.
How are things re your job?  Are they pressuring you to return? And also, have they opened up things at all in Georgia only to be shutting them down gain?

Stay safe!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 14, 2020, 06:27:05 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 02:37:17 AM
How are things re your job?  Are they pressuring you to return? And also, have they opened up things at all in Georgia only to be shutting them down gain?

Stay safe!

PD

The company I have to go through in order to get a leave of absence has given me until August 3rd and then they said after this date they can no longer approve the absences. But, in all honesty, I don't really care. I'm looking out for my family and myself. It's really upsetting that there are people that have to go to work because they simply can't afford to not have an income. Those stimulus checks we all received were a complete joke. Anyway, if I lose my job, I'll just file for unemployment. I'm not too worried about it as I'm doing exactly what I believe I should be doing.

As far as Georgia reopening up stores and so forth, I suppose they are. I haven't really been anywhere except for my local grocery store since late March. I keep hearing things in the news how businesses are reopening only to go back to closing up because one of their employees had tested positive for COVID. It's just a huge gamble and, as I've mentioned previously, I think it was way too soon. How are things going on your end, PD?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 07:28:25 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 14, 2020, 06:27:05 AM
The company I have to go through in order to get a leave of absence has given me until August 3rd and then they said after this date they can no longer approve the absences. But, in all honesty, I don't really care. I'm looking out for my family and myself. It's really upsetting that there are people that have to go to work because they simply can't afford to not have an income. Those stimulus checks we all received were a complete joke. Anyway, if I lose my job, I'll just file for unemployment. I'm not too worried about it as I'm doing exactly what I believe I should be doing.

As far as Georgia reopening up stores and so forth, I suppose they are. I haven't really been anywhere except for my local grocery store since late March. I keep hearing things in the news how businesses are reopening only to go back to closing up because one of their employees had tested positive for COVID. It's just a huge gamble and, as I've mentioned previously, I think it was way too soon. How are things going on your end, PD?
Pretty well here.  Like you, I don't venture forth much...do need to get back to walking and hiking more though (presuming I can do so without running into people).  Thoughts of biking too are tempting me (that and a few pounds gained during all this!  ::) ).  I have been into a couple of places besides grocery stores.  Most everyone around here is good about sanitizing their hands and trying to keep distanced and using masks.  Went to one doctor's appointment and that went fine; I waited outside in truck and they called me when they were ready (they did have some people in their waiting room.  I just arrived there awfully early.).  Gardening is keeping me busy (trying to keep up with weeding and watering of vegetables).  Rates are low around where I live, so not paranoid but still trying to be sensible.   :)  So, to sum it up, I'm lucky!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 07:37:18 AM
Gardening is great these days ... I helped fixing an overgrown garden, and walking the dog of the house etc., for almost a week recently, while the owners were abroad on a holiday. It was nice to see some quick results of that garden work, respecting of course the lay-out and design that was already there ...'

In today's news:
French health workers getting a pay rise of almost 200 Euros per month, thanking them for their efforts during the crisis
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53398208

We need more of that way of looking at things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 14, 2020, 07:39:47 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 07:28:25 AM
Pretty well here.  Like you, I don't venture forth much...do need to get back to walking and hiking more though (presuming I can do so without running into people).  Thoughts of biking too are tempting me (that and a few pounds gained during all this!  ::) ).  I have been into a couple of places besides grocery stores.  Most everyone around here is good about sanitizing their hands and trying to keep distanced and using masks.  Went to one doctor's appointment and that went fine; I waited outside in truck and they called me when they were ready (they did have some people in their waiting room.  I just arrived there awfully early.).  Gardening is keeping me busy (trying to keep up with weeding and watering of vegetables).  Rates are low around where I live, so not paranoid but still trying to be sensible.   :)  So, to sum it up, I'm lucky!

Very good to read, PD. :) Stay well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 09:39:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 07:37:18 AM
Gardening is great these days ... I helped fixing an overgrown garden, and walking the dog of the house etc., for almost a week recently, while the owners were abroad on a holiday. It was nice to see some quick results of that garden work, respecting of course the lay-out and design that was already there ...'

In today's news:
French health workers getting a pay rise of almost 200 Euros per month, thanking them for their efforts during the crisis
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53398208

We need more of that way of looking at things.
MT,

Wow!  Bet that they appreciated all of your help!  And somebody went on holiday?!  Was it someplace inside Denmark?  Or did they dare to venture further?

And nice to hear about a pay raise for the French healthcare workers.
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 14, 2020, 07:39:47 AM
Very good to read, PD. :) Stay well!
Will try...thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 09:39:17 AM
MT,

Wow!  Bet that they appreciated all of your help!  And somebody went on holiday?!  Was it someplace inside Denmark?  Or did they dare to venture further?

And nice to hear about a pay raise for the French healthcare workers.Will try...thanks!

They went to France, needed a vacation, in a car. It was no longer warned against by our government. Me and my mother then took over at their house :). But it was quite nice, with the garden and walks with the dog by the local fjord, plus a few excursions such as to Selsø castle, Elsinore and Roskilde town, as a contrast to the big city here.

Do you grow vegetables/fruits, or is it mainly flowers/greenery?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 10:12:35 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 09:46:35 AM
They went to France, needed a vacation, in a car. It was no longer warned against by our government. Me and my mother then took over at their house :). But it was quite nice, with the garden and walks with the dog by the local fjord, plus a few excursions such as to Selsø castle, Elsinore and Roskilde town, as a contrast to the big city here.

Do you grow vegetables/fruits, or is it mainly flowers/greenery?
Nice!

I have a mixture...a fair bit of perennials, a few trees...lots of it is sunny.  My veggie garden is really vegetables (not getting into botanical quibbles about what is really a fruit...like tomatoes).  I probably should have planted some fruit bushes/trees vs. the prima donnas, aka rose bushes, but they do look and smell so pretty when they bloom.   :) Would love to find room for things like strawberry plants and blueberry bushes...an asparagus bed, etc.  Oh, and a fairly good assortment of herbs:  basil (several types), flat-leaf parsley, tarragon, oregano, marjoram, sage, rosemary, thyme, a small lavender plant, lemon verbena...think that I got everybody there?  :-\

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2020, 10:28:03 AM
The obituary section of The Houston Chronicle this past Sunday was 43 pp. and required separate binding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 10:30:28 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 10:12:35 AM
Nice!

I have a mixture...a fair bit of perennials, a few trees...lots of it is sunny.  My veggie garden is really vegetables (not getting into botanical quibbles about what is really a fruit...like tomatoes).  I probably should have planted some fruit bushes/trees vs. the prima donnas, aka rose bushes, but they do look and smell so pretty when they bloom.   :) Would love to find room for things like strawberry plants and blueberry bushes...an asparagus bed, etc.  Oh, and a fairly good assortment of herbs:  basil (several types), flat-leaf parsley, tarragon, oregano, marjoram, sage, rosemary, thyme, a small lavender plant, lemon verbena...think that I got everybody there?  :-\

PD

Well, it must be nice, harvesting one's own stuff and seeing it grow. My mother was able to make a little jam from berries and rhubarbs there, but it's a little early for apples etc. here. Roses were in full blossom, of course. Herbs are great, and one can use space-saving pots, obviously. We even have a supermarket chain now, that has begun cultivating some inside their shops ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 11:38:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 14, 2020, 10:28:03 AM
The obituary section of The Houston Chronicle this past Sunday was 43 pp. and required separate binding.
Hi Karl,

I looked into that a bit and found a Newsweek article.  It's a bit more complicated than that apparently.  According to the article, it's for all this year (so far) and also includes non-Covid deaths.  https://www.newsweek.com/texas-newspaper-prints-43-page-obituary-section-coronavirus-deaths-soar-1517297  It's thought that it was to help people grieve when they couldn't attend a normal funeral.

Do you know anything further/elsewise?

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 11:43:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 14, 2020, 10:30:28 AM
Well, it must be nice, harvesting one's own stuff and seeing it grow. My mother was able to make a little jam from berries and rhubarbs there, but it's a little early for apples etc. here. Roses were in full blossom, of course. Herbs are great, and one can use space-saving pots, obviously. We even have a supermarket chain now, that has begun cultivating some inside their shops ...
It is for the most part...don't always enjoy all of the weeding, watering, bug squishing (and sometimes spraying)....and dealing with little animals that like to chew on my tomatoes just as they are ripening.   >:(  Emoji was re animals.  Nice to be able to share it and know that with some 'help from above'/Mother Nature I managed to grow it.   :)

Neat that they are growing and selling plants in the market!  Cool.

Best wishes and stay safe,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2020, 11:48:47 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 11:38:30 AM
Hi Karl,

I looked into that a bit and found a Newsweek article.  It's a bit more complicated than that apparently.  According to the article, it's for all this year (so far) and also includes non-Covid deaths.  https://www.newsweek.com/texas-newspaper-prints-43-page-obituary-section-coronavirus-deaths-soar-1517297  It's thought that it was to help people grieve when they couldn't attend a normal funeral.

Do you know anything further/elsewise?

Best wishes,

PD


Thanks for the added color, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 11:52:04 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 14, 2020, 11:48:47 AM
Thanks for the added color, PD!
You're welcome Karl!

Still a lot of deaths though!   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 14, 2020, 12:05:51 PM
An Israeli researcher thinks an anti-cholesterol drug may help fight Covid19.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/existing-drug-may-downgrade-covid-threat-to-common-cold-level-jerusalem-study/

If this theory about the virus increasing lipid deposits is correct, we may know why so strokes, heart attacks, and other circulatory/neurological problems are found in virus patients. [It would also help explain the diarrhea some people experience.]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 14, 2020, 12:27:03 PM
I read today that the coronavirus attacks the endothelium (inner layer) of blood vessels, essentially weakening the tissue and its elasticity. The whole vascular system becomes 'old' in just a few days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2020, 01:35:11 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 14, 2020, 12:05:51 PM
An Israeli researcher thinks an anti-cholesterol drug may help fight Covid19.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/existing-drug-may-downgrade-covid-threat-to-common-cold-level-jerusalem-study/

If this theory about the virus increasing lipid deposits is correct, we may know why so strokes, heart attacks, and other circulatory/neurological problems are found in virus patients. [It would also help explain the diarrhea some people experience.]
Interesting JBS.  So, maybe added incentive to lower ones bad cholesterol levels asap?  Any comments about how those with low numbers to begin with do when hit by the virus?  Scary thoughts re the virus in any event.  Hope that they're onto something!
Quote from: André on July 14, 2020, 12:27:03 PM
I read today that the coronavirus attacks the endothelium (inner layer) of blood vessels, essentially weakening the tissue and its elasticity. The whole vascular system becomes 'old' in just a few days.
Eek!!  :o

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on July 14, 2020, 02:00:37 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 14, 2020, 12:05:51 PM
An Israeli researcher thinks an anti-cholesterol drug may help fight Covid19.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/existing-drug-may-downgrade-covid-threat-to-common-cold-level-jerusalem-study/

If this theory about the virus increasing lipid deposits is correct, we may know why so strokes, heart attacks, and other circulatory/neurological problems are found in virus patients. [It would also help explain the diarrhea some people experience.]

That is seriously interesting!

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 14, 2020, 05:24:10 PM
Make that seriously scary!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 14, 2020, 06:33:11 PM
From Bloomberg (their non-paywall coronavirus page):

Trump Officials Order Hospitals to Bypass CDC on Virus Data (7:58 a.m. HK)
The Trump administration has ordered hospitals to send data on coronavirus patients to a central database and skip the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a move some public health experts say will allow the data to be manipulated for political gain, the New York Times reports.

The order, effective Wednesday, was posted on the Department of Health and Human Services website this week and came after a tense conference call between virus response coordinator Deborah Birx and hospital officials, according to the report.


And from CNBC:

Trump says U.S. would have half the coronavirus cases if it did half the testing
President Donald Trump insisted that the U.S. would have fewer coronavirus cases if it conducted less testing — even as outbreaks continue to surge across the nation and deaths begin to pick up pace.

"Think of this, if we didn't do testing, instead of testing over 40 million people, if we did half the testing we would have half the cases," Trump said at a press conference at the White House. "If we did another, you cut that in half, we would have, yet again, half of that. But the headlines are always testing."

He said that if the U.S. didn't test people for Covid-19, then you wouldn't have "all the headlines" because the nation has one of the lowest mortality rates. While the U.S. has conducted more testing than any other country, it also has the most fatalities — 136,300 of the world's approximately 576,800 deaths. — Noah Higgins-Dunn


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2020, 06:43:42 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 14, 2020, 06:33:11 PM
From Bloomberg (their non-paywall coronavirus page):

Trump Officials Order Hospitals to Bypass CDC on Virus Data (7:58 a.m. HK)
The Trump administration has ordered hospitals to send data on coronavirus patients to a central database and skip the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a move some public health experts say will allow the data to be manipulated for political gain, the New York Times reports.

The order, effective Wednesday, was posted on the Department of Health and Human Services website this week and came after a tense conference call between virus response coordinator Deborah Birx and hospital officials, according to the report.


And from CNBC:

Trump says U.S. would have half the coronavirus cases if it did half the testing
President Donald Trump insisted that the U.S. would have fewer coronavirus cases if it conducted less testing — even as outbreaks continue to surge across the nation and deaths begin to pick up pace.

"Think of this, if we didn't do testing, instead of testing over 40 million people, if we did half the testing we would have half the cases," Trump said at a press conference at the White House. "If we did another, you cut that in half, we would have, yet again, half of that. But the headlines are always testing."

He said that if the U.S. didn't test people for Covid-19, then you wouldn't have "all the headlines" because the nation has one of the lowest mortality rates. While the U.S. has conducted more testing than any other country, it also has the most fatalities — 136,300 of the world's approximately 576,800 deaths. — Noah Higgins-Dunn




All part of a pattern of suppressing the data.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 14, 2020, 06:48:23 PM
Honestly, reading that s**t renders me completely speechless.
I can't do anything beyond posting the news items, because expression of my thoughts would not get past the moderators. :'(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2020, 07:02:44 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 14, 2020, 06:48:23 PM
Honestly, reading that s**t renders me completely speechless.
I can't do anything beyond posting the news items, because expression of my thoughts would not get past the moderators. :'(

There is that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 15, 2020, 02:51:14 PM
     The CDC has knuckled under to Trump. Redfield will not utter a twerpish peep about the diversion of data. What he has peeped is that the present virus surge in the South probably mainly came from vacationing northerners who infested bars and restaurants in Texas, Arizona and Florida. Higher taxes and LGBTQ indoctrination will come later.

     So, it comes down to Dr. Redfield isn't a reliable mangler of data for Trump, and all he can be trusted to do is keep his mouth shut about it. Well, that's not nothing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 15, 2020, 06:09:34 PM
https://news.yahoo.com/aide-posts-cartoon-mocking-fauci-123717928.html

Classy gesture by one of the Orange Swindler's "most trusted advisers", who happens to be...drum roll... the OS's "former golf caddy who has been by the president's side since the 2016 campaign, is one of the few aides who has Trump's confidence."

Hey, here's a suggestion for Coronavirus Czar:
(https://irs.www.warnerbros.com/gallery-v2-jpeg/caddyshack_photo10.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 16, 2020, 06:54:41 AM
We got a leaflet through the door today suggesting we mark 72 years of the NHS by for example baking 72 cakes or cookies, selling them and giving the NHS the money. Presumably to fund dealing with the subsequent diabetes and cancer ::).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 16, 2020, 07:11:36 AM
Previously public data has already disappeared from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website after the Trump administration quietly shifted control of the information to the Department of Health and Human Services.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/16/us-coronavirus-data-has-already-disappeared-after-trump-administration-shifted-control-from-cdc-to-hhs.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 16, 2020, 02:03:29 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 16, 2020, 07:11:36 AM
Previously public data has already disappeared from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website after the Trump administration quietly shifted control of the information to the Department of Health and Human Services.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/16/us-coronavirus-data-has-already-disappeared-after-trump-administration-shifted-control-from-cdc-to-hhs.html
I'm a bit confused here.  I did hear the story about the CDC no longer receiving the data directly, but thought that that had been changed back?  Are they now supposed to be getting the data from the HHS directly vs. from the states and is that why they no longer will be posting it? 

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 16, 2020, 02:34:03 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 16, 2020, 02:03:29 PM
I'm a bit confused here.  I did hear the story about the CDC no longer receiving the data directly, but thought that that had been changed back?  Are they now supposed to be getting the data from the HHS directly vs. from the states and is that why they no longer will be posting it? 

PD

Might be a fluid situation, but this is the latest news I read from CNBC (emphasis added):

5 HOURS AGO [1:30 PM EDT July 16]
CDC restores some hospital data, but will no longer update
After CNBC reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention removed data on the availability of hospital beds across the country from its website, the agency has republished some of the data through Tuesday, but said it will no longer provide updates.

"The following downloadable file contains national and state estimates from the NHSN COVID-19 Module," the CDC says on its site. "This file will not be updated after July 14, 2020 and includes data from April 1 to July 14."


The move comes after the Trump administration directed states to stop reporting the relevant data directly to the CDC, and to instead report it through a portal with the Department of Health and Human Services. In the future, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said, HHS will provide "more powerful insights."

"Yes, HHS is committed to being transparent with the American public about the information it is collecting on the coronavirus," he said. "Therefore, HHS has directed CDC to re-establish the coronavirus dashboards it withdrew from the public on Wednesday." —Will Feuer


As I read it, the CDC "restored" "some" data covering April 14 through July 14, but will not provide the data from July 14 going forward. So they've terminated public access to the data effective July 14.

Time will tell whether HHS provides comparable information, but I seriously doubt it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 05:21:35 AM
This story might be blocked by a paywall, but it deserves attention:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-17/georgia-massaged-virus-data-to-reopen-then-voided-mask-orders

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 17, 2020, 05:33:06 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 05:21:35 AM
This story might be blocked by a paywall, but it deserves interest:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-17/georgia-massaged-virus-data-to-reopen-then-voided-mask-orders

Thanks, it read fine in Reader View. It just goes to show how statistics can be misused, people should be more sceptical and decide for themselves if they want to go to bars etc. What puts me off here is the thought of giving my ID then getting ordered to isolate for a fortnight because someone else has caught the virus. Then it happening again and again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 17, 2020, 05:52:47 AM
From Nature: Coronavirus research updates: Antiviral antibodies peter out within weeks after infection (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00502-w)

Hopes for a vaccine may be overblown.  Hopefully not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 17, 2020, 06:15:24 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 17, 2020, 05:52:47 AM
From Nature: Coronavirus research updates: Antiviral antibodies peter out within weeks after infection (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00502-w)

Hopes for a vaccine may be overblown.  Hopefully not.

I expect something will be produced. How safe it will be is another matter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 17, 2020, 07:07:14 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 17, 2020, 06:15:24 AM
I expect something will be produced. How safe it will be is another matter.


I would think multiple vaccines will be produced.  Safety is one concern, to be sure, but effectiveness is even more important.  That is what some evidence indicates may be in question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 07:16:14 AM

     We don't have an HIV vaccine. That's something to keep in mind.

     I'm thinking we might end up with an annual vaccine cocktail for influenza and Covid.

     I'm optimistc about improved treatment options. There are a couple of reasons the death toll has been lower recently. One is the age of the infected population, and another is that treatment keeps getting better.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 17, 2020, 07:20:00 AM
Tackling diabetes seems to be worth doing too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 17, 2020, 07:21:11 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 07:16:14 AM
     We don't have an HIV vaccine. That's something to keep in mind.


HIV is not an airborne disease.  That's something to keep in mind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 17, 2020, 09:08:02 AM
- Lots of optimistic stories about vaccine progress in various countries (the US, GB, DK, RU military (🤔), etc). Including possibilities of a vaccine beginning to be distributed this year. But we'll see.

- Of the 5.6 mio Danish population, 1 mio has now been tested, and 1.3 % were found to be infected, which is probably fairly indicative for the situation in many places.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 09:13:44 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 17, 2020, 07:21:11 AM

HIV is not an airborne disease.  That's something to keep in mind.

    You can do both. The point is that there may be no vaccine that's effective, or no vaccine that's effective for long. If we're lucky and determined we might get to the point where an annual booster shot is effective enough to keep the virus infection rate well controlled. We may never get as far as we did with polio or smallpox.

     So, we're going to need better treatments so people can go to the doctor, get real time testing and be treated immediately, then go home and quarantine. That's something that will happen.

     The vaccine goal is not primarily to prevent you from getting the virus, it's to prevent the virus from getting to you by creating a web of firebreaks through the whole population. The aggregate effect of the vaccine is what protects you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 17, 2020, 10:59:19 AM
Thank goodness no one on GMG is responsible for making public health policy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 01:56:52 PM
   
Quote from: Todd on July 17, 2020, 10:59:19 AM
Thank goodness no one on GMG is responsible for making public health policy.

     No, it would be better if it was made by almost anyone on GMG. Anyway, how vaccines that reach 50% effectiveness work isn't hard to figure out. And 50% may turn out to be what we get.

     FDA Sets Bar for COVID-19 Vaccine Approval at 50% Effectiveness (https://www.biospace.com/article/fda-s-guidance-on-a-covid-19-vaccine-must-be-at-least-50-percent-effective/)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 02:18:55 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 17, 2020, 09:08:02 AM
- Lots of optimistic stories about vaccine progress in various countries (the US, GB, DK, RU military (🤔), etc). Including possibilities of a vaccine beginning to be distributed this year. But we'll see.

- Of the 5.6 mio Danish population, 1 mio has now been tested, and 1.3 % were found to be infected, which is probably fairly indicative for the situation in many places.

     Positive rates in some states are in the 18-23% range. Some states that have recovered from severe outbreaks are at 1-2%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 17, 2020, 02:32:24 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 02:18:55 PM
     Positive rates in some states are in the 18-23% range. Some states that have recovered from severe outbreaks are at 1-2%.

Obviously, the low numbers I mentioned would usually be related to areas with quite effective social distancing and lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 17, 2020, 02:52:52 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 16, 2020, 02:34:03 PM
Might be a fluid situation, but this is the latest news I read from CNBC (emphasis added):

5 HOURS AGO [1:30 PM EDT July 16]
CDC restores some hospital data, but will no longer update
After CNBC reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention removed data on the availability of hospital beds across the country from its website, the agency has republished some of the data through Tuesday, but said it will no longer provide updates.

"The following downloadable file contains national and state estimates from the NHSN COVID-19 Module," the CDC says on its site. "This file will not be updated after July 14, 2020 and includes data from April 1 to July 14."


The move comes after the Trump administration directed states to stop reporting the relevant data directly to the CDC, and to instead report it through a portal with the Department of Health and Human Services. In the future, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said, HHS will provide "more powerful insights."

"Yes, HHS is committed to being transparent with the American public about the information it is collecting on the coronavirus," he said. "Therefore, HHS has directed CDC to re-establish the coronavirus dashboards it withdrew from the public on Wednesday." —Will Feuer


As I read it, the CDC "restored" "some" data covering April 14 through July 14, but will not provide the data from July 14 going forward. So they've terminated public access to the data effective July 14.

Time will tell whether HHS provides comparable information, but I seriously doubt it.
Thank you T.D.  I hope that the CDC manages to get back the information directly.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 17, 2020, 02:52:52 PM
Thank you T.D.  I hope that the CDC manages to get back the information directly.

Best wishes,

PD

Here's what CNBC reported this afternoon (around 2 PM EDT):
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/17/coronavirus-live-updates.html

5 HOURS AGO
Governors urge administration to delay data reporting change
All of the nation's governors are urging the Trump administration to delay its decision to shift control of U.S. coronavirus hospital data away from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The governors are calling for a 30-day delay, even though the policy has already been implemented and the CDC has stopped updating some data on its site as a result. The governors said in a statement that hospitals need time to adapt to the new reporting system.

They also urged the Department of Health and Human Services to make the data public. An HHS spokeswoman told CNBC the agency is working to make the data public, potentially "in a few days." —Will Feuer


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 03:27:11 PM

     I think we'll get better numbers from the CDC than the Dept. Of October Surprise. I trust Dr. Twerpfield more than Azar, who is like unto a snake, provided you don't like snakes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 04:24:58 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 03:27:11 PM
     I think we'll get better numbers from the CDC than the Dept. Of October Surprise. I trust Dr. Twerpfield more than Azar, who is like unto a snake, provided you don't like snakes.

I'm not optimistic. But in keeping with all the ineptness to date, it's likely that when (if?  ;D ) they fudge the numbers going forward, it'll be done in such a dumbass ham-fisted way that data analysts will immediately spot it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 04:29:44 PM

     Where are people wearing masks the most/least?

     (https://i.imgur.com/jDANqhE.png)

     The darker the area the more likely that people you encounter will be wearing masks. Take a look at Georgia. It looks like DeGovernor Kemp is having an effect, or Georgians are imposing a moronic convergence on his sorry ass. Either way, don't go there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 17, 2020, 06:21:18 PM
It may not quite correlate. I live in one of the darkest spots on the map, but my county (as of this morning) had 445 out of 510 adult ICU beds filled, and about 4400 out of about 5300 hospital beds overall filled. Positivity rate for testing is about 15% for the past week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 06:43:52 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 17, 2020, 06:21:18 PM
It may not quite correlate. I live in one of the darkest spots on the map, but my county (as of this morning) had 445 out of 510 adult ICU beds filled, and about 4400 out of about 5300 hospital beds overall filled. Positivity rate for testing is about 15% for the past week.

    When New York and Massachusetts were Ground Zero we learned to wear masks and didn't stop wearing them because in order to crush the virus that's what you have to do. You never stop never stopping.

    It looks like that's happening in some parts of some southern and southwestern states, only the public is leading the public officials reluctantly in the right direction. They are still dragging their heels.

    I shudder to think what a "just bog" would do to these guys. They'd have to watch a loop of "Two Broke Girls" only relieved by the Cars For Kids ad until the Heat Death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 06:53:52 PM
My county (Ulster Co., NY) was consistently over 15% positivity rate (up to 25%) during the depths of the lockdown, but I don't believe hospital beds / ICU got as tight as mentioned in FLA above . Agreed, that's when many "got religion" about masks. I'm 62 years old, and have a feeling I'll be wearing a mask in public for the foreseeable future, quite possibly years. I'm seeing younger people "mask up" less and take more risks (IMO). And there are many who eschew masks and curse the Governor. Even in this fairly dark-shaded county, there have been anti-mask demonstrations. Zooming in on the NYT chart, the rural Western part of the county wears masks less than the urbanized East (definite political party correlation), but the COVID cases have been strongly concentrated in the urban areas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 17, 2020, 08:06:19 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 17, 2020, 06:53:52 PM
My county (Ulster Co., NY) was consistently over 15% positivity rate (up to 25%) during the depths of the lockdown, but I don't believe hospital beds / ICU got as tight as mentioned in FLA above . Agreed, that's when many "got religion" about masks. I'm 62 years old, and have a feeling I'll be wearing a mask in public for the foreseeable future, quite possibly years. I'm seeing younger people "mask up" less and take more risks (IMO). And there are many who eschew masks and curse the Governor. Even in this fairly dark-shaded county, there have been anti-mask demonstrations. Zooming in on the NYT chart, the rural Western part of the county wears masks less than the urbanized East (definite political party correlation), but the COVID cases have been strongly concentrated in the urban areas.

    Where I am you wear masks. Businesses require it. Other people expect it. Our reopening has been slow and caution is high. We know not to throw away the painful effort we put in for months to get to this point. "Nyah, nyah, you can't make me" doesn't fly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 02:54:37 AM
Most of the World May Face Covid Without a Vaccine
"There will be another wave, and it will be very serious."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-18/covid-most-of-world-to-face-virus-without-vaccine-expert-says
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 18, 2020, 04:05:05 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 02:54:37 AM
Most of the World May Face Covid Without a Vaccine
"There will be another wave, and it will be very serious."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-18/covid-most-of-world-to-face-virus-without-vaccine-expert-says

Unfortunately it is human nature to deny the severity of a serious situation out of fear of having to face reality, until it is too late.... 

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 05:22:37 AM
I fear this will have a paywall (I'm a subscriber), but...
The Economist has an article assessing the chances of an "October Surprise" for the Orange Swindler.

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/07/18/donald-trump-is-hoping-for-a-covid-19-treatment-by-november
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 18, 2020, 05:32:10 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 05:22:37 AM
I fear this will have a paywall (I'm a subscriber), but...
The Economist has an article assessing the chances of an "October Surprise" for the Orange Swindler.

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/07/18/donald-trump-is-hoping-for-a-covid-19-treatment-by-november

     You Google the title then link to the cached page.

     Donald Trump is hoping for a covid-19 treatment by November (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bclVM11TNooJ:https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/07/18/donald-trump-is-hoping-for-a-covid-19-treatment-by-november+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on July 18, 2020, 09:31:07 AM
I live in Essex County NY, which has one of the lowest case counts in the state and 0 fatalities from Covid-19. It's also a "red" county. Here mask compliance indoors — outdoor crowding is not an issue — has been universal and unquestioned. Some people are even hiking with masks, which is kind of weird, but, better overkill than non-compliance. People here got a direct, simple, unambiguous message and they are following it. It just requires minimally competent leadership.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 18, 2020, 09:45:59 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 05:22:37 AM
I fear this will have a paywall (I'm a subscriber), but...
The Economist has an article assessing the chances of an "October Surprise" for the Orange Swindler.

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/07/18/donald-trump-is-hoping-for-a-covid-19-treatment-by-november


Hopefully, OWS works.  I have doubts, but it is worth the effort and money.  Indeed, $13 billion seems light.  Uncle Sam should spend a trillion or more if needed.  Whatever it takes.  Whoever the president.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 18, 2020, 12:00:19 PM
     One has to weigh carefully whether it's worth a few thousand extra deaths to deny Trump the WH.

     Oh......sorry.......my mirroring module misfired.

     It has come up on occasion that the Dems are trying to make the viral and economic situation better even though it potentially could get Trump reelected. Why aren't they McConnelling him? Is it naivete, or an overactive sincerity gland?





     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on July 18, 2020, 12:07:23 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 18, 2020, 12:00:19 PM
     One has to weigh carefully whether it's worth a few thousand extra deaths to deny Trump the WH.

     Oh......sorry.......my mirroring module misfired.

     It has come up on occasion that the Dems are trying to make the viral and economic situation better even though it potentially could get Trump reelected. Why aren't they McConnelling him? Is it naivete, or an overactive sincerity gland?

It's virtue signaling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 18, 2020, 01:04:37 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on July 18, 2020, 12:07:23 PM
It's virtue signaling.

     I don't have a window into souls, but I wouldn't mind punching holes in them to see if there really are millions of tiny robots inside.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 18, 2020, 03:17:07 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/18/white-house-seeks-to-block-funds-for-testing-in-coronavirus-relief-bill-report.html

Which references (possible paywall with Post):

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/07/18/white-house-testing-budget-cdc-coronavirus/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/18/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-response-failure-leadership.html

The White House is trying to block billions of dollars for coronavirus testing and contact tracing in the upcoming stimulus relief bill, according to a new report in The Washington Post, even as infections surge across the country and Americans face long wait times to receive test results amid high demand. 

The Trump administration also wants to block billions of dollars that would go toward bolstering the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Pentagon and the State Department to combat the pandemic, the Post reported Saturday, citing people familiar with the deliberations. 

The White House declined CNBC's request for comment.

Some GOP lawmakers, angered by the administration's position, are pushing back and trying to keep the $25 billion for testing and tracing in the bill, people involved in the negotiations told the Post. Some White House officials reportedly believe new money shouldn't be allocated for testing because previous assistance funds remain unspent.

While moving to block testing assistance, the Trump administration is trying to use the legislation to fund priorities unrelated to the pandemic such as a new FBI building, according to the Post.

The Post report comes just hours after a piece in The New York Times detailed how the White House sought to shift responsibility for dealing with the pandemic to the state governments with disastrous results. The Times' report was based on interviews with state and administration officials as well as emails and documents.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 18, 2020, 11:41:19 PM
I was interested to receive a letter from the Office for National Statistics asking if I'd be willing to participate in their Coronavirus testing survey which I agreed to do. You get periodically tested over several weeks and you get paid as well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 19, 2020, 12:11:25 AM
The Americas now seem the main battleground:

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fc9fd9bae-c78a-11ea-9d81-eb7f2a294e50?dpr=1&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 04:18:26 AM
We bumped into the vicar of this church at the end of our walk today. He said there were about 15 people at the service, maintaining social distancing, and the service was shorter than it used to be as they weren't allowed to sing. They'd still been ringing the bells though, we could hear them in the distance.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 19, 2020, 05:32:47 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 04:18:26 AM
We bumped into the vicar of this church at the end of our walk today. He said there were about 15 people at the service, maintaining social distancing, and the service was shorter than it used to be as they weren't allowed to sing. They'd still been ringing the bells though, we could hear them in the distance.
My wife went to church this morning for a socially-distanced service with no singing. Only one bell was allowed to ring (or maybe only one person was allowed to ring it). My wife said that it was a lovely service although the microphone wasn't working. It was videod for members of the congregation who couldn't attend. Unfortunately the camera was mis-aligned so that everything was on its side  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 06:59:15 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 19, 2020, 05:32:47 AM
My wife went to church this morning for a socially-distanced service with no singing. Only one bell was allowed to ring (or maybe only one person was allowed to ring it). My wife said that it was a lovely service although the microphone wasn't working. It was videod for members of the congregation who couldn't attend. Unfortunately the camera was mis-aligned so that everything was on its side  8)

I'm sure there will be an appropriate quote for that somewhere in the Bible ;).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 19, 2020, 07:06:09 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 06:59:15 AM
I'm sure there will be an appropriate quote for that somewhere in the Bible ;).
I'm sure you're right  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 07:17:38 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 19, 2020, 07:06:09 AM
I'm sure you're right  :)

I just googled it. Isaiah 8. Oops :-[.

19 When people tell you, "Try out the fortunetellers. Consult the spiritualists. Why not tap into the spirit-world, get in touch with the dead?" 20 Tell them, "No, we're going to study the Scriptures." People who try the other ways get nowhere - a dead end! 21 Frustrated and famished, they try one thing after another. When nothing works out they get angry, cursing first this god and then that one, Looking this way and that, 22 up, down, and sideways - and seeing nothing, A blank wall, an empty hole. They end up in the dark with nothing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 19, 2020, 07:19:06 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on July 18, 2020, 09:31:07 AM
I live in Essex County NY, which has one of the lowest case counts in the state and 0 fatalities from Covid-19. It's also a "red" county. Here mask compliance indoors — outdoor crowding is not an issue — has been universal and unquestioned. Some people are even hiking with masks, which is kind of weird, but, better overkill than non-compliance. People here got a direct, simple, unambiguous message and they are following it. It just requires minimally competent leadership.

Verily.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 19, 2020, 07:21:50 AM
Absurdity of the day (but it's early yet...):

Donald Trump called U.S. virus testing "the envy of the world" on "Foaux News Sunday"

Trump Calls Fauci 'an Alarmist' (9:50 a.m. NY)
President Donald Trump said Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government's top infectious-disease expert, is a "little bit of an alarmist" but that the two men have a "great relationship."

Trump made the comments in a lengthy interview on "Faux News Sunday" after members of his administration have criticized Fauci. The president also said he'd heard the U.S. has the "best mortality rate" related to the virus. He provided White House data that undercut his argument, showing the U.S. rate isn't the lowest.

"We are the envy of the world," Trump said about testing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BWV 1080 on July 19, 2020, 07:30:20 AM
The link between blood type and Covid-19 is BS

Native Americans are nearly 100% type O, yet Covid-19 rages across Latin America and threatens to wipe out indigenous groups in the Amazon.

and this study was just published


"We showed through a multi-institutional study that there is no reason to believe being a certain ABO blood type will lead to increased disease severity, which we defined as requiring intubation or leading to death," said senior study author Anahita Dua, HMS assistant professor of surgery at Mass General.

"This evidence should help put to rest previous reports of a possible association between blood type A and a higher risk for COVID-19 infection and mortality," Dua said.

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/covid-blood-type
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 19, 2020, 08:31:41 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 07:17:38 AM


19 When people tell you, "Try out the fortunetellers. Consult the spiritualists. Why not tap into the spirit-world, get in touch with the dead?" 20 Tell them, "No, we're going to study the Scriptures." People who try the other ways get nowhere - a dead end! 21 Frustrated and famished, they try one thing after another. When nothing works out they get angry, cursing first this god and then that one, Looking this way and that, 22 up, down, and sideways - and seeing nothing, A blank wall, an empty hole. They end up in the dark with nothing.

     (https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMDFmMjg4OWQtNGZjYy00NzcxLThmZjctNjlkOGZjNzlkNzQyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjI5Nzk4ODg@._V1_.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 09:10:58 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 19, 2020, 08:31:41 AM
     (https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMDFmMjg4OWQtNGZjYy00NzcxLThmZjctNjlkOGZjNzlkNzQyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjI5Nzk4ODg@._V1_.jpg)

Oh are you quoting Jesus at me too?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 19, 2020, 09:50:35 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-07-19/undermining-the-cdc-while-coronavirus-spreads-puts-lives-at-risk

It's an op-ed piece. Arguments make sense to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 19, 2020, 12:42:22 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 19, 2020, 07:17:38 AM
I just googled it. Isaiah 8. Oops :-[.

19 When people tell you, "Try out the fortunetellers. Consult the spiritualists. Why not tap into the spirit-world, get in touch with the dead?" 20 Tell them, "No, we're going to study the Scriptures." People who try the other ways get nowhere - a dead end! 21 Frustrated and famished, they try one thing after another. When nothing works out they get angry, cursing first this god and then that one, Looking this way and that, 22 up, down, and sideways - and seeing nothing, A blank wall, an empty hole. They end up in the dark with nothing.
Yes, that must be it  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 20, 2020, 08:17:46 AM
Coronavirus: Oxford vaccine triggers immune response (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53469839)  (BBC)

So, what is Trump going to do now.....?  ::)

Buy Oxford University?

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 20, 2020, 08:40:21 AM
Quote from: Que on July 20, 2020, 08:17:46 AM
Coronavirus: Oxford vaccine triggers immune response (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53469839)  (BBC)

So, what is Trump going to do now.....?  ::)

Buy Oxford University?

Q


The UK could use a good trade agreement right about now.

Hopefully, fourteen point font translates into medical efficacy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 20, 2020, 09:13:35 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 20, 2020, 08:40:21 AM

The UK could use a good trade agreement right about now.

The thought  crossed my mind as well. That's going to be very, very generous trade agreement.

QuoteHopefully, fourteen point font translates into medical efficacy.

We'll see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 20, 2020, 09:33:42 AM
Quote from: Que on July 20, 2020, 09:13:35 AM
The thought  crossed my mind as well. That's going to be very, very generous trade agreement.


Or a ho hum one accompanied by an implicit threat to limit the Bank of England's access to the Fed.


Quote from: Que on July 20, 2020, 09:13:35 AMWe'll see.


I suppose we will also see if Oxford will be able to address production, distribution, and deployment of the vaccine if it works. 

The Covid crisis has exposed a tendency toward Pollyannaish outlooks by a lot of people.  There are some who believe that economic hardship will be short-lived, and others who believe that the power of modern medical science will deliver a timely cure that will wipe away the disease for a large section of humanity in a matter of months.  This would be unprecedented.  It is not impossible, of course.  I tend to think that economic stagnation, years long elimination of entire sectors of economies the world over, increased inequality in some regions, and an evolution of Covid into a global endemic disease are more likely outcomes.  The 2020s may very well become a global lost decade.  Vaccines are needed and research should be very generously funded everywhere, but it does not appear at all clear that presently researched vaccines will be more effective over time than influenza vaccines.  If the cited vaccine is the magic bullet that makes everything go away, great, I'm all for it.  Give the researchers Nobel Prizes, reward them with peerages or whatnot, create a new holiday, erect monuments, etc.  But, as you wrote, we'll see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 20, 2020, 11:23:16 AM

     How Long Does COVID-19 Immunity Last? (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:rzDTmCx3pPoJ:https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/could-covid-19-immunity-really-disappear-months/614377/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

     The recent news about declining immunity after a few months may not be as bad as it first seemed. They didn't measure the entire immune response and didn't account for the way a weak initial response to a virus exposure can become stronger, like a head start. Flu vaccines typically work like that. And best of all, perhaps, is the discovery that immunity gained from exposure to the SARS virus years ago gives such a boost to the Covid immune response.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BWV 1080 on July 20, 2020, 11:34:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 20, 2020, 09:33:42 AM

I suppose we will also see if Oxford will be able to address production, distribution, and deployment of the vaccine if it works. 



AstraZeneca partnered with Oxford  and agreed to distribute largely at cost
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 20, 2020, 11:54:23 AM
Quote from: BWV 1080 on July 20, 2020, 11:34:00 AM
AstraZeneca partnered with Oxford  and agreed to distribute largely at cost


Sweet.  Hopefully it is safe, works, and can be distributed and administered globally at levels sufficient to establish global herd immunity.  (Or even national level herd immunity, rich countries first.)  And hopefully the effects last.  And hopefully Covid doesn't mutate in such a manner necessitating a new vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 20, 2020, 04:56:43 PM
From a couple months back: U.S. gives AstraZeneca $1.2 billion to fund Oxford University coronavirus vaccine — America would get 300 million doses beginning in October (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-gives-astrazeneca-12-billion-to-fund-oxford-university-coronavirus-vaccine-securing-300-million-doses-for-country-from-october-2020-05-21)

So, looks like the Oxford potential breakthrough is funded by Uncle Sam's U.S. Biomedical Research and Development Authority.  Trump won't have to buy Oxford; he already bought the vaccine.  OWS may work.  Trump's reelection plan may save the world. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 20, 2020, 10:40:55 PM
Smart move from Trump...

Seems Several EU countries made a similar move: AstraZeneca to supply Europe with up to 400 million doses of Oxford University's vaccine at no profit (https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/astrazeneca-to-supply-europe-with-up-to-400-million-doses-of-oxford-universitys-vaccine-at-no-profit.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 21, 2020, 04:39:29 AM
Quote from: Que on July 20, 2020, 10:40:55 PM
Smart move from Trump...

Seems Several EU countries made a similar move: AstraZeneca to supply Europe with up to 400 million doses of Oxford University's vaccine at no profit (https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/astrazeneca-to-supply-europe-with-up-to-400-million-doses-of-oxford-universitys-vaccine-at-no-profit.html)


Why did it take European leaders a month longer than Trump to cut a deal?

Of course, a similar question is why did it take so long for European leaders to take anything remotely close to serious action on the economic front in response to Covid: E.U. Adopts Groundbreaking Stimulus to Fight Coronavirus Recession (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/20/world/europe/eu-stimulus-coronavirus.html). 

And do remember, the Oxford research project is only one of many research projects funded by Uncle Sam. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 21, 2020, 07:03:15 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 21, 2020, 04:39:29 AM
why did it take so long for European leaders to take anything remotely close to serious action on the economic front in response to Covid: E.U. Adopts Groundbreaking Stimulus to Fight Coronavirus Recession (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/20/world/europe/eu-stimulus-coronavirus.html). 

Because the EU is far from being a monolithic conglomerate run by an elitist clique in Brussels which has it the way they want, when they want* --- as some anti-EU propaganda paints it. When it comes to concrete, decisive, all-for-one-and-one-for all actions and measures, the EU is not much different from Offenbach's carabiniers.  ;D

(*it's actually run by an elitist clique located in Berlin, Amsterdam and Vienna, with Paris trying hard to join the club and regain their long lost power and prestige.  ;D)

That being said, I'd rather have Romania within EU than without. There is no next best option for us, really. We Romanians have a proverb: it's bad with bad but without bad it's worse. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 21, 2020, 08:59:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 21, 2020, 07:03:15 AMBecause the EU is far from being a monolithic conglomerate run by an elitist clique in Brussels which has it the way they want, when they want* --- as some anti-EU propaganda paints it.


That's true, but given the severity and gravity of the situation, and the unparalleled moral and intellectual standing of European officials, I would have thought that this would offer a perfect moment for Europe to lead, not to rely on American money and initiative.  Well, at least someone has taken the time and effort to cast a wide net, backed with actual money, to develop a vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 21, 2020, 02:21:18 PM
German Jewish leaders fear rise of antisemitic conspiracy theories linked to Covid-19
Opponents of lockdown holding Jews increasingly responsible for spread of virus (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/german-jewish-leaders-fear-rise-of-antisemitic-conspiracy-theories-linked-to-covid-19)

"A leader of Germany's Jewish community has expressed alarm at the spread of antisemitic conspiracy theories relating to coronavirus in the country, including attempts to downplay the Holocaust.

Josef Schuster, the president of the Central Council of Jews, said Jews were increasingly being held collectively responsible for the spread of the virus and compared the situation to narratives around the plague in the Middle Ages.

At high-profile demonstrations against coronavirus measures, figures such as the Hungarian-born financier George Soros have been blamed for starting the pandemic with the help of the German government in order to gain power and influence.

One prominent participant in the demonstrations, the celebrity TV chef Attila Hildmann, has espoused increasingly elaborate conspiracy theories over the course of the coronavirus crisis that have praised Adolf Hitler and described the chancellor, Angela Merkel, as a communist dictator. State prosecutors say they are investigating whether they can press charges against him.

Schuster said of particular concern to him were the frequent comparisons being made between the measures taken to dampen the spread of the pandemic and the treatment of Jewish people under the Nazis. Anti-vaxxer demonstrators at so-called "hygiene demonstrations" have often worn yellow stars similar to those Jews were forced to wear during the Third Reich, but bearing the word ungeimpft (unvaccinated) instead of Jude (Jew). Their wearers have said when a vaccination against coronavirus becomes available they will refuse to be inoculated, seeing themselves as victims of a dictatorship."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 21, 2020, 02:35:37 PM
The Unchecked Rise in Cases Turns Deadly: This Week in COVID-19 Data, July 16

The US is approaching half a million new cases of COVID-19 each week. States with major outbreaks including Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas all saw record high weekly hospitalizations and deaths. Meanwhile, worsening outbreaks in many other states threaten to increase the pandemic's death toll in the coming weeks.
(https://covidtracking.com/blog/weekly-update-unchecked-new-cases-turn-deadly)

So why hasn't the USA been able to contain the spread of the virus?

I guess it is not as easy as waving with your wallet or bullying other countries around in order to obtain vital assets?

And all the vaccine talk and chest beating about money shouldn't distract us from the reality that even if efforts to develop a vaccine are successful and quick, it won't be available any time soon and certainly not before a second wave will hit the world.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 21, 2020, 02:59:47 PM
Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 02:35:37 PM
The Unchecked Rise in Cases Turns Deadly: This Week in COVID-19 Data, July 16

The US is approaching half a million new cases of COVID-19 each week. States with major outbreaks including Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas all saw record high weekly hospitalizations and deaths. Meanwhile, worsening outbreaks in many other states threaten to increase the pandemic's death toll in the coming weeks.
(https://covidtracking.com/blog/weekly-update-unchecked-new-cases-turn-deadly)

So why hasn't the USA been able to contain the spread of the virus?

I guess it is not as easy as waving with your wallet or bullying other countries around in order to obtain vital assets
?

And all the vaccine talk and chest beating about money shouldn't distract us from the reality that even if efforts to develop a vaccine are successful and quick, it won't be available any time soon and certainly not before a second wave will hit the world.

Q

Well said (emphasis added).

For an example of how a rational and non-backward country responded, see

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/21/germanys-coronavirus-response-masterful-science-communication.html

"...
Germany has confirmed more than 200,000 cases of Covid-19 and more than 9,000 deaths in a population of more than 83 million. Germany's mortality rate per 100,000 is among the lowest in Europe. By way of comparison, the U.S., with about four times the population, has had more than 3.8 million cases and 140,000 deaths.

What went really well
Science communication
Germany, like many other countries, had a contingent of people who fought lockdowns and argued that Covid-19 was a hoax. But it also had a handful of prominent scientists communicating regularly and openly with the public. That played a huge role in drowning out rumors and misinformation, locals tell CNBC.

"We have a great educational system and everyone has access to it," said Dennis Traub, a tech worker in Hamburg, Germany. "So I believe that many people and the majority listened to both sides and one of those sides sounded much more reasonable." ..."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 21, 2020, 04:39:39 PM
Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 02:35:37 PMSo why hasn't the USA been able to contain the spread of the virus?


I thought it was pretty well known at this point. Trump has been as bad as a president can be in effectively using his limited executive power in the public health space.  Additionally, he opted to try to politicize the disease in the foolish hope that it was not serious.  (Trump has, however, done a very good job at the economic response.)  There has been a lack of coordination between federal authorities and state authorities.  There has been a lack of coordination between different state authorities.  There has been poor or at least terribly uncoordinated leadership at the state and local level across much of the country.  And large portions of the the populace, of varying degrees of intelligence, have ignored the advice of public health officials, ignore and/or distrust science, and resist authoritarian edicts, even when they are for the public's good.  At least, that's what I've gleaned from the unending press coverage.  Perhaps your understanding is materially different.


Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 02:35:37 PMI guess it is not as easy as waving with your wallet or bullying other countries around in order to obtain vital assets?

Spending vast sums around the world on R&D and equipment is necessary to achieve public health goals, and one of the spillover benefits of US spending may turn out to be a vaccine that saves millions of lives all over the world.  Since Europe failed to lead - again - the US sort of did.  I mean, Europeans didn't lead here, they didn't lead in 2007-2008, and they didn't lead even during the Yugoslav Wars.  Maybe one day European leaders will live up to their limitless potential; maybe they will lead during the next big crisis.  (jk)


Quote from: T. D. on July 21, 2020, 02:59:47 PM
Germany has confirmed more than 200,000 cases of Covid-19 and more than 9,000 deaths in a population of more than 83 million . . .


Germany is the one large country in Europe that has shown how to manage a crisis, at least domestically.  Germany will reap a variety of rewards.  Good work, Ms Merkel, et al! 

Of course, a host of Asian countries have done an even better job than Germany.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 21, 2020, 11:22:09 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 21, 2020, 04:39:39 PM
Spending vast sums around the world on R&D and equipment is necessary to achieve public health goals, and one of the spillover benefits of US spending may turn out to be a vaccine that saves millions of lives all over the world.  Since Europe failed to lead - again - the US sort of did.  I mean, Europeans didn't lead here, they didn't lead in 2007-2008, and they didn't lead even during the Yugoslav Wars.  Maybe one day European leaders will live up to their limitless potential; maybe they will lead during the next big crisis.  (jk)

Money needs to be invested, absolutely. And in hindsight all the SARS research projects that were aborted after the previous epidemic should have continued instead.

But what this pandemic has shown is that regardless of the availability of scientific solutions or financial resources, there are other factors that influence the level of preparedness as a society. Policies that are based on scientific insights and are executed through professional expertise is one important factor. The general access of the population to proper healthcare, delivered by a system with a high level of coordination  and cooperation is another. Third is a preexisting general economic safety net in case people are unable to work due to sickness or quarantine. Last but not least is a high level of trust in government or by lack thereof: at least a readiness to follow the rules.

The USA failed on all these points, and European countries did significantly - and sufficiently - better in comparison. No amount of administrative and political coordination in the US (or money) could have made up for these flaws.

Germany is frequently mentioned as a shining example. It did well but, as Jo mentioned, it also had some luck with a low level of initial exposure to the virus. But let me mention Greece as another example: no money, no leverage on the international stage and an underfunded healthcare system that is hanging by a thread. But realising its vulnerability, it acted early, quickly and decisively. You don't need money to survive this crisis, you need good government first and foremost.

No quibbles with the critique on the lack of any coordinated efforts and leadership by European countries: they failed utterly in that respect! But the US didn't lead either, not even sort of.  Undermining the position of the WHO and trying to "grab" whatever medical supplies and control over possible vaccines, is no leadership in my book.

The USA did however successfully intervene to stabilise the international financial markets, but this was purely out if self interest. And the effects might unfortunately be short lived - if the virus continues to spiral out of control in the Americas (and India and possibly Russia) I don't see how a global economic crash can be avoided. In that respect the inability of the USA to handle this health crisis will undo us all....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 22, 2020, 04:43:06 AM
Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 11:22:09 PMBut the US didn't lead either, not even sort of.

But it did lead, at least sort of.  Picking potential winners in the midst of chaos and funding projects quickly while many established powers dawdle and bicker is something leaders do.  Europe failed yet again.

"Undermining" the WHO is another example of leadership.  It is leadership people who prefer the existing international order dislike, but it is leadership, as is relying on political and economic strength to procure necessary resources in the midst of crisis, even at the expense of allies.  Some allies are more important than others. 

The pandemic is worsening fissures in the international system, and creating new ones.  That's OK.  No international system lasts forever.   


Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 11:22:09 PMIn that respect the inability of the USA to handle this health crisis will undo us all....

If it does, that merely demonstrates a failure of leadership over decades all over the world, starting with Europe, the wealthiest, best educated part of the world.  It if happens, Europe will have failed yet again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on July 22, 2020, 06:20:27 AM
Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 11:22:09 PM
Money needs to be invested, absolutely. And in hindsight all the SARS research projects that were aborted after the previous epidemic should have continued instead.

But what this pandemic has shown is that regardless of the availability of scientific solutions or financial resources, there are other factors that influence the level of preparedness as a society. Policies that are based on scientific insights and are executed through professional expertise is one important factor. The general access of the population to proper healthcare, delivered by a system with a high level of coordination  and cooperation is another. Third is a preexisting general economic safety net in case people are unable to work due to sickness or quarantine. Last but not least is a high level of trust in government or by lack thereof: at least a readiness to follow the rules.

The USA failed on all these points, and European countries did significantly - and sufficiently - better in comparison. No amount of administrative and political coordination in the US (or money) could have made up for these flaws.

Germany is frequently mentioned as a shining example. It did well but, as Jo mentioned, it also had some luck with a low level of initial exposure to the virus. But let me mention Greece as another example: no money, no leverage on the international stage and an underfunded healthcare system that is hanging by a thread. But realising its vulnerability, it acted early, quickly and decisively. You don't need money to survive this crisis, you need good government first and foremost.

No quibbles with the critique on the lack of any coordinated efforts and leadership by European countries: they failed utterly in that respect! But the US didn't lead either, not even sort of.  Undermining the position of the WHO and trying to "grab" whatever medical supplies and control over possible vaccines, is no leadership in my book.

The USA did however successfully intervene to stabilise the international financial markets, but this was purely out if self interest. And the effects might unfortunately be short lived - if the virus continues to spiral out of control in the Americas (and India and possibly Russia) I don't see how a global economic crash can be avoided. In that respect the inability of the USA to handle this health crisis will undo us all....

Q

That is not going to happen.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/eu-plan-to-tackle-covid-19-drug-shortages-hit-by-health-budget-cuts/ar-BB173scy?ocid=msedgntp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 22, 2020, 07:38:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 22, 2020, 04:43:06 AM
But it did lead, at least sort of.  Picking potential winners in the midst of chaos and funding projects quickly while many established powers dawdle and bicker is something leaders do.  Europe failed yet again.

"Undermining" the WHO is another example of leadership.  It is leadership people who prefer the existing international order dislike, but it is leadership, as is relying on political and economic strength to procure necessary resources in the midst of crisis, even at the expense of allies.  Some allies are more important than others. 

The pandemic is worsening fissures in the international system, and creating new ones.  That's OK.  No international system lasts forever.   

If it does, that merely demonstrates a failure of leadership over decades all over the world, starting with Europe, the wealthiest, best educated part of the world.  It if happens, Europe will have failed yet again.

Europe is divided.... as it has been as long as we can remember. And now the US is (internally) divided too.

Tearing down the existing world order is relatively easy for a big player as the US and certainly no sign of international leadership. Leadership would be shown by building a new order. But by acting as a geopolitical hooligan, Trump will gamble the last bit of the political credit the US has in the world away.

What will remain is the economic might of the US... for now... Because the economic might of the US is highly dependent on the existing world order. When that goes down, so will ultimately the economic might of the US. People at the Federal Reserve, the Treasury and the State Department understand that. Unfortunately they seem pretty much alone in that realisation these days.

And as things are developing, I don't see any credible replacement for the leadership position of the US.
As a consequence, we might have to face a long period of geopolitical instability until a new world order settles.
IMO the pandemic will trigger the major geopolitical shift that has been in the making for the past decade or so.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 22, 2020, 08:25:08 AM
Quote from: Que on July 22, 2020, 07:38:00 AMAnd now the US is (internally) divided too.


The US has never been quite as politically unified as the common misrepresentation of the 20th Century post war years one sees in print and online.  The US has been as divided as it is now  - or worse - multiple times in the past.  There is a tendency, however, to place special emphasis on the here and now, and to believe that it is special and unique.  Maybe it is, what with Covid and all.

While it is of course true that the existing international system benefits the US, it is also true that the US is less dependent on trade than any other major economy, and it has been since the 19th Century.  The US should still engage with the world economically, to be sure, but it also has resources at its disposal that very few other countries do.  It is true that a disintegration of the existing system will have negative consequences for the US, but so does remaining in and maintaining the existing system. 

The world is in the throes of moving toward a multi-polar world more akin to what existed for centuries before the distorted and unsustainable post-war system.  It is precisely because of this that the US should endeavor to destroy the EU, or at least completely hobble it.  It can be like a mini UN and it wouldn't matter.  If Europe could somehow come up with a coherent approach to the world, it could be a meaningful rival.  That should not be allowed to happen.  I know that is an unpopular view, and I know that Biden will attempt to move back to something closer to what existed pre-Trump, as will various others in both parties, and Europe may still come up with a unified approach to domestic and international governance, but that seems even less likely that the US disintegrating and become a third or fourth rate power like those that constitute Europe anytime soon.  Even a diminished US will enjoy its geographical and physical resource advantages, as well as a host of political and social advantages.  Maybe China eats America's lunch this century.  Americans will still be rich and powerful, maybe just relatively less so.  Oh well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 22, 2020, 09:14:58 PM
The last time the country was as divided as this was back in the sixties.  Back then we had the Viet Nam War that killed 58,000 Americans over a ten year period.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 22, 2020, 10:12:32 PM
I can not figure how to download this video into this post so here is the link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 22, 2020, 11:51:16 PM
I admit I had a good laugh, but of the situation in the US is very serious:

(https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/21269.jpeg)

We looking at the number of virus related deaths per day.
Now, the US has a large population so the hight of the peak of a couple months ago isn't that odd.
The problem is that the number of deaths is going up again. And off course that's looking at the possible unfortunate outcome of an infection after many weeks. 
Other graphs show that the number of new cases is soaring. And we know there is about a month between infection and hospitalisation. Hospitalizations will go up exponentially, and so will the number of deaths.
Soon the US will be back to square one...

Any economic damage that has been the result of containment measures sofar, will basically have been for nothing.
From an economic point of view the US will have wasted billions and billions of dollars.

The trillion dollar question is: is the US going to try again?  ::)  Does it have a choice?

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 23, 2020, 12:00:17 AM
Make that trillions of dollars.

However, reports show that Mnuchin and Trump have made sure that a large portion of that relief money has gotten into the hands of GOP donors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 23, 2020, 12:57:35 AM
Todd, you sort of contradict yourself.

Quote from: Todd on July 22, 2020, 08:25:08 AM
The world is in the throes of moving toward a multi-polar world more akin to what existed for centuries before the distorted and unsustainable post-war system.  It is precisely because of this that the US should endeavor to destroy the EU, or at least completely hobble it.  It can be like a mini UN and it wouldn't matter.  If Europe could somehow come up with a coherent approach to the world, it could be a meaningful rival.  That should not be allowed to happen. 

What you basically say is that the US should endeavor to destroy or hobble any potentially meaningful rival, thus preserving precisely the "distorted and unsustainable post-war system" and not allowing to happen exactly the "multi-polar world more akin to what existed for centuries".

Besides, how is EU a rival to the US? In one form or another it's been in existence for several decades and never posed the slightest economical or military threat to the US, on the contrary, both it and its member states have generally been staunch allies and sincere friends of the US. What makes you think this will radically change in the future?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 23, 2020, 04:47:55 AM
Quote from: Que on July 22, 2020, 11:51:16 PM
The trillion dollar question is: is the US going to try again?  ::)  Does it have a choice?

The US federal government will enact one additional fiscal spending package before the election, and more thereafter.  Individual fiscal spending packages will exceed a trillion dollars, and cumulatively they will exceed multiple trillions of dollars.

The Fed will continue to engage in expanded quantitative easing, buying non-traditional assets (eg, high yield debt, municipal bonds).  The Fed will also continue to operate swap lines for other, lesser countries and entities.  For instance, the ECB still can't get its act together and has to come hat in hand to the Fed.  It's really rather disgraceful.


Quote from: Florestan on July 23, 2020, 12:57:35 AM
Todd, you sort of contradict yourself.

What you basically say is that the US should endeavor to destroy or hobble any potentially meaningful rival, thus preserving precisely the "distorted and unsustainable post-war system" and not allowing to happen exactly the "multi-polar world more akin to what existed for centuries".

Besides, how is EU a rival to the US? In one form or another it's been in existence for several decades and never posed the slightest economical or military threat to the US, on the contrary, both it and its member states have generally been staunch allies and sincere friends of the US. What makes you think this will radically change in the future?

You got it wrong.  Try again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 23, 2020, 05:50:32 AM

     The alliance of cooperators has a fairly minimal set of requirements to allow the membership to be fairly wide. Ideology must give way to pragmatics. An interesting feature of such alliances is that a country wants to be a member but isn't forced to stay. It's in the beliefs and the practice.

     Another point is that what cooperation is for doesn't require that any opponent rise up as a major threat. The web of cooperators is desirable in itself both for resolution of member conflicts and its outward facing aspect. The only way it will become obsolete is by the disinclination of members to continue to be part of a cooperative arrangement. Wanting to be part of another cooperative group with a super ideology isn't probable.

     Critics of alliances don't have options to offer that are attractive in the real world. What should Japan do, or Australia? Taiwan is an economic powerhouse threatened by Chicoms. Who should decide they should be sacrificed, the U.S., the Taiwanese themselves, who?

     I don't think multipolarity invalidates the alliance system. Nothing in the real world does until members don't want to be in it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 23, 2020, 06:19:36 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 23, 2020, 04:47:55 AM
You got it wrong. 

Then please correct me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 23, 2020, 07:40:47 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/a-public-health-employee-predicted-floridas-coronavirus-catastrophe-then-she-was-fired-this-is-everything-i-was-trying-to-warn-184810565.html

"More people are gonna die," Rebekah Jones wrote to her mother and sisters on Facebook. It was April 26, a warm spring Sunday in Tallahassee, Fla., and she was just finishing work at the Florida Department of Health, where she was managing the state's much-praised coronavirus dashboard, which she had also created.

"I feel sick," the 30-year-old doctoral student continued.

The exchange marked the beginning of an exceptionally turbulent period for Jones, who was demonized by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as a rogue employee while also being celebrated by his detractors as a brave truth teller willing to stand up to political power.

In a whistleblower complaint Jones filed last Thursday with the Florida Commission on Human Relations, her attorneys alleged that she was fired by the state's Department of Health for "refusing to publish misleading health data."

DeSantis's office did not respond to requests for comment.

"We wanted to be wrong," Jones told Yahoo News. "What we're seeing right now is actually far worse than what we anticipated." Back in May, DeSantis's combative press secretary dismissed as "alarmist" new projections showing the state suffering 4,000 mortalities from COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. Florida now has more than 5,000 coronavirus fatalities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 23, 2020, 08:28:52 AM
Quote from: Que on July 21, 2020, 02:35:37 PM
The Unchecked Rise in Cases Turns Deadly: This Week in COVID-19 Data, July 16

The US is approaching half a million new cases of COVID-19 each week. States with major outbreaks including Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas all saw record high weekly hospitalizations and deaths. Meanwhile, worsening outbreaks in many other states threaten to increase the pandemic's death toll in the coming weeks.
(https://covidtracking.com/blog/weekly-update-unchecked-new-cases-turn-deadly)

So why hasn't the USA been able to contain the spread of the virus?

Lack of responsible leadership, exacerbated by a large swath of the population who are wilfully blind to the incompetence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 23, 2020, 03:35:56 PM
The latest episode of The Axe Files is a one hour interview with Anthony Fauci:

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-axe-files-presented-by-the-university-of-chicago-institute/e/76404532?autoplay=true
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 23, 2020, 10:46:39 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 23, 2020, 03:35:56 PM
The latest episode of The Axe Files is a one hour interview with Anthony Fauci:

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-axe-files-presented-by-the-university-of-chicago-institute/e/76404532?autoplay=true

Very interesting!

At 0:35 Fauci gives two reasons for the fact that the US hasn't "brought the virus back down to the baseline":
1) the containment measures never got to the right level;
2) Americans have an issue with authority.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 24, 2020, 12:10:24 AM
Quote from: Todd on July 23, 2020, 04:47:55 AM
The US federal government will enact one additional fiscal spending package before the election, and more thereafter.  Individual fiscal spending packages will exceed a trillion dollars, and cumulatively they will exceed multiple trillions of dollars.

The Fed will continue to engage in expanded quantitative easing, buying non-traditional assets (eg, high yield debt, municipal bonds).  The Fed will also continue to operate swap lines for other, lesser countries and entities.  For instance, the ECB still can't get its act together and has to come hat in hand to the Fed.  It's really rather disgraceful.

All points happily granted. The US is able to throw much more money at this than it already did, I'm sure.

But my point is that money alone is not going to fix this.
To get the virus under control, the US will have to go into another - and this time more coordinated and thorough - lockdown.

Is there the political and popular will (and unity) to see such a painful process through?
If not, every dollar spent - whether billions or trillions - will be wasted.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 24, 2020, 03:10:14 AM
Going in a second lockdown would mean the Orange Man would be admitting failure, so that's unlikely.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 24, 2020, 03:17:43 AM
Interesting that even Dr Fauci construes "the American persona" as "indepent" and averse to "authority" and he calls it "the spirit that formed our country".

That's a myth, basically built in the era of Hollywood westerns. The seventeenth and eighteenth century Americans were perfectly willing to accept authority.

And even now people are slaves to authority, look at the idolatry on the faces of people in the crowds of Trump rallies. They were willing to lay down their lives for a good "lock her up" chant. The only problem is that authority people are looking for is alrgely from snake-oil salesmen like Trump, Limbaugh and Hannity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 24, 2020, 04:46:14 AM
Quote from: Que on July 24, 2020, 12:10:24 AMBut my point is that money alone is not going to fix this.

To get the virus under control, the US will have to go into another - and this time more coordinated and thorough - lockdown.


I have at no time claimed that money alone will solve the problem.  I have primarily focused on the continued inability of Europe to gets its fiscal and monetary house in order, thus relying on the US and diverting American resources. That harms the US.  Then I placed that in the context of the dissolving international system.  The current crisis is accelerating that, and the US should take full advantage of it.  Alas, too many folks cling to the past.

With respect to a coordinated and thorough lockdown in the US, the president does not enjoy powers under the Constitution to impose and enforce rules sufficient to achieve that.  At the very least, Congress would have to pass new legislation and the executive branch enforce it.  And then it would rightly and immediately be challenged in court.  The Commerce Clause does not grant Congress the power to do that, nor does any other provision in Article I, and case law pertaining to public emergencies does not envision national lockdowns.  The ironic thing is that some of the same people who decry Trump's authoritarian/dictatorial/fascist actions turn around and decry him for not engaging in an even more authoritarian/dictatorial/fascist action than even the most ardent proponents of essentially unlimited executive power, like Billy Barr, would even suggest.  (Some people get easily confused about what a slave to authority is.)  Such a lockdown will require coordination at the state level, with federal participation to provide guidance and resources.  The last would be the ticket; pass some massive spending bill that includes gobs of cash for compliance - money being one of the most important tools in the public health tool chest.  More governors are slowly moving in that direction without coercive federal action.  There's a degree of coordination on the Left Coast and has been for months, and some other states coordinate activities.  But there needs to be more.  Governors are on the hook, but even some of them are constrained by state constitutions. 

As to wasting money, the US does that on everything, all the time.  No biggie.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 24, 2020, 04:59:15 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-24/americans-spread-virus-fear-in-one-eu-country-they-can-visit
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 24, 2020, 05:34:00 AM
Quote from: Que on July 24, 2020, 12:10:24 AM
All points happily granted. The US is able to throw much more money at this than it already did, I'm sure.



     For a sovereign currency issuer like the US the need for throwing money and the ability to throw it is always an identity.

     It's harder to waste money than people usually think. Less then optimal spending goes optimal when money is spent on into the economy. Idled resources tend to be less efficient than running out of dollars to deploy them even when spending is sub-optimal. This insight is captured by the increased efficiency of digging holes and filling them in a demand crunch compared to allowing demand to spiral down. That's exactly why we are paying people to spend for their own needs when unemployed. It's more efficient than not doing it. We would be less concerned with the suffering of individuals if it wasn't more efficient in the aggregate to relieve it than to let the unemployed drag the rest of the economy down with them.

     Whatever value judgments are attached to helping those who need help, there's a cold, hard determination behind doing it. Many on the left and right would prefer not to understand the point. Both sides think helping the needy is a burden.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 24, 2020, 05:53:38 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 24, 2020, 04:59:15 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-24/americans-spread-virus-fear-in-one-eu-country-they-can-visit

Ireland would do well to ban USA tourists just like the rest of the EU.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 24, 2020, 06:47:32 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on July 22, 2020, 10:12:32 PM
I can not figure how to download this video into this post so here is the link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw)
Karl had also brought up this video earlier.  First time that I had ever heard of Randy Rainbow, but he certainly is very talented and creative!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 24, 2020, 07:26:49 AM

Quote from: arpeggio on July 22, 2020, 10:12:32 PM
I can not figure how to download this video into this post so here is the link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUiDLcp_hIw)

You use Flash instead of Hyperlink, changing this portion "watch?v=" to "v/"

https://www.youtube.com/v/lUiDLcp_hIw
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 24, 2020, 08:36:21 AM
Quote from: Que on July 23, 2020, 10:46:39 PM
Very interesting!

At 0:35 Fauci gives two reasons for the fact that the US hasn't "brought the virus back down to the baseline":
1) the containment measures never got to the right level;
2) Americans have an issue with authority.

Q

You #2 is important reason why we have problems here in the United States.  Although they are only a minority, they are a large enough group to cause problems.  On television there was a doctor who stated why there are problems in California.  In San Francisco they are doing a better job with the virus than in Los Angeles.  He stated that it is because there are more people in the Los Angeles area that are defying the anti-virus restrictions that have been implemented.  All one has to do is look at pictures of the beaches and the large numbers that are not wearing masks.

The lesson is that even here in the United States it is possible for a radical minority, who think they are the true majority, to take control.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 24, 2020, 09:32:38 AM
Spain's Reopening Stumbles as Virus Cases Rise Among Young People (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/world/europe/spain-coronavirus-reopening.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 24, 2020, 03:00:33 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 24, 2020, 04:46:14 AM

The ironic thing is that some of the same people who decry Trump's authoritarian/dictatorial/fascist actions turn around and decry him for not engaging in an even more authoritarian/dictatorial/fascist action than even the most ardent proponents of essentially unlimited executive power, like Billy Barr, would even suggest. 

Who is saying this? Absolutely nobody is saying this. Wanting him to stop contradicting and undermining the health experts and stop cheering on the dissenters and conspiracy theory peddlers is not asking him to be a dictator.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on July 24, 2020, 03:18:08 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 24, 2020, 03:00:33 PM
Who is saying this? Absolutely nobody is saying this. Wanting him to stop contradicting and undermining the health experts and stop cheering on the dissenters and conspiracy theory peddlers is not asking him to be a dictator.

I agree.  A leader knows how to lead without being a dictator.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on July 24, 2020, 03:27:50 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 24, 2020, 03:00:33 PM
Who is saying this? Absolutely nobody is saying this. Wanting him to stop contradicting and undermining the health experts and stop cheering on the dissenters and conspiracy theory peddlers is not asking him to be a dictator.

Nor is asking him — months ago — to coordinate a national policy on mitigation, production and distribution of essential supplies, testing, and contact tracing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 24, 2020, 07:00:49 PM
Quote from: Herman on July 24, 2020, 05:53:38 AM
Ireland would do well to ban USA tourists just like the rest of the EU.

That's for sure. And it's not just the EU:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-23/americans-not-welcome-in-caribbean-resorts-re-opening-to-tourism

I always thought the Orange Swindler was going to render the USA a pariah country.  ;) That's happening to a degree, but for reasons I never imagined.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 24, 2020, 07:08:15 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on July 24, 2020, 03:27:50 PM
Nor is asking him — months ago — to coordinate a national policy on mitigation, production and distribution of essential supplies, testing, and contact tracing.

He's trolling. It's a sick mind entertaining hisself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 24, 2020, 10:55:51 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 24, 2020, 07:08:15 PM
He's trolling. It's a sick mind entertaining hisself.

And deep down he's proud at achieving such a mortality rate on his watch. Bigger and better than Vietnam!

After all, this is a man who bragged about his sexual exploits (if any, but that's another issue) as being his Vietnam.

As I said before, he positively gets a kick out of people dying because of him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 25, 2020, 02:52:32 PM
South Korea story:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-25/these-elite-contact-tracers-show-the-world-how-to-beat-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 26, 2020, 11:23:22 AM


     C.D.C. Calls on Schools to Reopen, Downplaying Health Risks (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/24/health/cdc-schools-coronavirus.html)

     The latest guidance went to the CDC and is supposed to be from the CDC. DR. Twerpfield prayed on it, or whatever he does, and now it's like it really came from the CDC.

In a call with reporters on Friday, Dr. Redfield said that he understood the "trepidation" many parents and teachers were feeling about reopening schools and that decisions should be made based on levels of infection in each community.

The new materials, he said, were not meant to replace the C.D.C.'s earlier guidance on school reopenings but "to really help put some more granular detail in how administrators and parents can begin to think about putting those guidelines into a practical plan."

Still, he said, "The goal line is to get the majority of these students back to face-to-face learning."


     It certainly is. He didn't have to say "even if it's unsafe" because everyone know that's what it means.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 26, 2020, 01:42:27 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 25, 2020, 02:52:32 PM
South Korea story:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-25/these-elite-contact-tracers-show-the-world-how-to-beat-covid-19

Thanks for that one. In the Uk bars and restaurants need to hold contact details of every group of customers, so they can be contacted if a positive result comes to light, and all the contacts are being encouraged to self isolate whether they have symptoms or not. This should go some way towards what happens in S Korea.


Strange times we live in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 27, 2020, 03:54:03 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-07-27/covid-19-sinclair-pulls-the-plug-on-fauci-propaganda-this-time

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-27/miami-marlins-cancel-game-as-virus-spreads-through-clubhouse

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-27/trump-national-security-advisor-robert-o-brien-has-coronavirus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 27, 2020, 08:02:28 AM
Coronavirus Is Back With a Vengeance in Places Where It Had All but Vanished

Hong Kong, Japan and Australia are seeing new waves of infections after relaxing Covid-19 restrictions (https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-is-back-with-a-vengeance-in-places-where-it-had-all-but-vanished-11595842202)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 27, 2020, 09:57:45 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 26, 2020, 01:42:27 PM
Thanks for that one. In the Uk bars and restaurants need to hold contact details of every group of customers, so they can be contacted if a positive result comes to light, and all the contacts are being encouraged to self isolate whether they have symptoms or not. This should go some way towards what happens in S Korea.


Strange times we live in.

Strange days, indeed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 27, 2020, 11:38:29 AM
Had my random sample Covid test today. I had to shove a probe down my throat and then up my nostrils (too much information! :o) - a most unsavoury business - but not without interest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 27, 2020, 11:41:52 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 27, 2020, 11:38:29 AM
Had my random sample Covid test today. I had to shove a probe down my throat and then up my nostrils (too much information! :o) - a most unsavoury business - but not without interest.

I hope you remembered to register your test online before putting it in the designated post box. I nearly forgot.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 27, 2020, 11:46:10 PM
Some questions about COVID which I can't find the answer to, maybe someone here can help:

1. In the UK, if you've been in contact with an infected person, you're asked to self isolate for two weeks even if you don't show symptoms yourself. Is Britain the only country doing that?

2. Is Britain the only country offering home swab tests?

3. As far as I understand it, just thinking intuitively,  the more rampant the disease is, the less likely false negatives are. I've forgotten all about Bayse's Rule, but am I right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 28, 2020, 08:46:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 26, 2020, 01:42:27 PM
Thanks for that one. In the Uk bars and restaurants need to hold contact details of every group of customers, so they can be contacted if a positive result comes to light, and all the contacts are being encouraged to self isolate whether they have symptoms or not. This should go some way towards what happens in S Korea.


Strange times we live in.
That would be smart!  If they even had one customer per group agree to provide their details--and to keep track of who all was in their group (and how to get ahold of them) and the date would help.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 28, 2020, 08:51:29 AM
So, the UK has home tests?  I haven't heard about that happening in the US.   :(

Just heard that Croatia is allowing Americans in (only country in the EU to do so).  You do have, apparently, to have had a test no more than 48 hours before arriving in the country and bring proof that you were negative.  I think also show were you would be lodging too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 28, 2020, 11:29:21 AM
Hasn't the Republic of Ireland been letting US citizens in? I posted a link some days ago.

And...

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-bored-pandemic-until-told-015633030.html

Trump was 'bored' with the pandemic — until he was told it was hurting 'our people': fellow Republicans

President Donald Trump's advisers got him to pay more attention to the COVID-19 pandemic by informing him that the surge in cases is hurting "our people" in Republican states, an administration official told The Washington Post.

The tactic has seemed to "resonate" with Trump, The Post reported on Monday, as the president "hewed closely to pre-scripted remarks" in subsequent news briefings.

Previously, the president had been losing interest in a pandemic that has cost an average of 850 deaths a day and killed more than 147,000 Americans.

"The president got bored with it," David Carney, an adviser to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, told The New York Times earlier this month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 28, 2020, 12:01:48 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 28, 2020, 11:29:21 AM
Hasn't the Republic of Ireland been letting US citizens in? I posted a link some days ago.

And...

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-bored-pandemic-until-told-015633030.html

Trump was 'bored' with the pandemic — until he was told it was hurting 'our people': fellow Republicans

President Donald Trump's advisers got him to pay more attention to the COVID-19 pandemic by informing him that the surge in cases is hurting "our people" in Republican states, an administration official told The Washington Post.

The tactic has seemed to "resonate" with Trump, The Post reported on Monday, as the president "hewed closely to pre-scripted remarks" in subsequent news briefings.

Previously, the president had been losing interest in a pandemic that has cost an average of 850 deaths a day and killed more than 147,000 Americans.

"The president got bored with it," David Carney, an adviser to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, told The New York Times earlier this month.

Ah, true!  The news station was either wrong...or I missed something.  It seems though, that Americans are supposed to self-quarantine for 14 days though....and a lot of them aren't doing it. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/507497-american-tourists-are-ignoring-quarantine-rule-on-visits-to-ireland

From the US Embassy's Irish website:

"The Irish government continues to advise against all non-essential foreign travel, and requires visitors arriving in Ireland, with limited exceptions, to restrict their movements and fill in a COVID-19 Passenger Locator Form indicating where they will self-isolate for 14 days.  Failure to complete the form and providing false or misleading information is an offense under Irish law, with a fine of up to €2,500 (nearly $3,000) and/or imprisonment of up to six months.  Travelers should be prepared for travel restrictions to be put into effect with little or no advance notice.  There are no restrictions on flights from the United States to Ireland although the number of available flights is significantly diminished.  Aer Lingus, American Airlines, and United Airlines are flying to the United States from Ireland, with limited service from Dublin to Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Newark, and New York.   Health Service Executive (HSE) staff are present in at the Dublin and Shannon airports to assist arriving passengers who have concerns related to COVID-19.  If you are in Ireland and have symptoms, phone a doctor or dial 112 or 999 locally.  If someone tests positive for the virus, the Department of Health (DOH) will isolate and treat the individual."

Personally, unless I was going to be there for at least several months, I wouldn't bother going there now as there would go my vacation!   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 28, 2020, 12:13:40 PM
You know darn well that (Ugly) Americans going to Ireland on vacation are not going to self-isolate for 14 days!
I posted this a few days ago: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-24/americans-spread-virus-fear-in-one-eu-country-they-can-visit

Personally, I wouldn't take any flight, so it's not an issue. (Disclosure: I'm 62 years old, American. I haven't even used a public toilet since mid-March; fortunately I work in a building which feels safe since I'm generally the only person there.) I'm of Irish descent and took several vacations there in the 1990s.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 28, 2020, 01:24:38 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 28, 2020, 12:13:40 PM
You know darn well that (Ugly) Americans going to Ireland on vacation are not going to self-isolate for 14 days!
I posted this a few days ago: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-24/americans-spread-virus-fear-in-one-eu-country-they-can-visit

Personally, I wouldn't take any flight, so it's not an issue. (Disclosure: I'm 62 years old, American. I haven't even used a public toilet since mid-March; fortunately I work in a building which feels safe since I'm generally the only person there.) I'm of Irish descent and took several vacations there in the 1990s.
Apparently, according to one of your links, travel is down about 95%.  I'd like to think that most people would mind the rules, but I'm probably being overly optimistic (I try and believe the best of folks). Again, one of the stories that you had linked to found out that the dreaded American lived there, but I'm sure that there are some stubborn folks who aren't following the rules.  I imagine that some of those too were/are probably staying with family/relatives (but that is certainly putting them at risk too as well as anyone else they or the relatives interact with).  Not a good scenario at all!  And if they are not following the rules, they certainly should pay the consequences. 

Last time I was there, I was a teenager....would love to go back...one day.   :)

Sláinte,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 29, 2020, 04:52:08 AM
UK, Germany warn against travel to Spain as Covid-19 re-emerges (https://www.france24.com/en/20200728-uk-germany-warn-against-travel-to-spain-as-covid-19-re-emerges)


Rise of new COVID-19 cases in Europe during tourism season triggers new restrictions (https://www.cbsnews.com/video/rise-of-new-covid-19-cases-in-europe-during-tourism-season-triggers-new-restrictions/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 29, 2020, 05:48:48 AM
 'One big wave' – why the Covid-19 second wave may not exist

With no evidence of seasonal variations, the WHO warns the initial coronavirus pandemic is continuing and accelerating (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/29/one-big-wave-why-the-covid-19-second-wave-may-not-exist-coronavirus)


Hopes of a temporal reprieve over the summer have gone up in smoke...

Long term restrictions will have to stay in place or reintroduced in Europe and Asia to keep the spread of the virus under control.

Meanwhile things are out of ontrol in the Americas, Russia and India....

Are we heading for a crash?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 29, 2020, 08:34:49 AM
Quote from: Que on July 29, 2020, 05:48:48 AM
Hopes of a temporal reprieve over the summer have gone up in smoke...


Covid is non-seasonal, spreads in all climates, and is more contagious than influenza.  Earlier in the month, the NIH Director cautioned that two doses of vaccine may be needed - provided one that works is found.  It is conceivable that routine boosters will be needed.  Economic and public health devastation on a global basis is still in an early phase.  Millions will likely die from Covid, perhaps more, and millions more will die as a result of medical and economic dislocation.  Worst case, not only could an economic crash come, but the conditions for large-scale warfare could arise, with or without an economic crash. 


On the research front:

The hunt for the origins of SARS-CoV-2 will look beyond China

The virus may have been born in South-East Asia (https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2020/07/22/the-hunt-for-the-origins-of-sars-cov-2-will-look-beyond-china)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 29, 2020, 08:47:48 AM
Why are sports in trouble in the U.S.? Because we didn't do the work. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/07/28/why-are-sports-trouble-us-because-we-didnt-do-work/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 29, 2020, 09:08:48 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/2uLJkpH__os
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 10:52:14 AM
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/07/29/louie-gohmert-coronavirus/

U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert [R-TX - surprise], a mask skeptic, tests positive for coronavirus
Gohmert, 66, said in a televised interview that he wonders if he may have caught the virus from wearing his mask.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 29, 2020, 11:28:08 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 10:52:14 AM
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/07/29/louie-gohmert-coronavirus/

U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert [R-TX - surprise], a mask skeptic, tests positive for coronavirus
Gohmert, 66, said in a televised interview that he wonders if he may have caught the virus from wearing his mask.

Medical genius.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 12:09:38 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 29, 2020, 11:28:08 AM
Medical genius.

From such a profound genius, there's of course much more... :D The following is from back in April. I'm sure one could find far more inanity, but I'll pass...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-us-congressman-louie-gohmert-germany-powder-cure-a9474416.html

...congressman Louie Gohmert falsely claimed that Germany is using a powder to help prevent health care workers from contracting Covid-19.

Earlier this month [April], during an interview with KLTV in Texas, Mr Gohmert claimed that health care workers were being protected from coronavirus by the substance.

"It is being used in Germany as a mist," Mr Gohmert said. "Health care workers go through a misting tent going into the hospital and it kills the coronavirus completely dead not only right then.

"Any time in the next 14 days that the virus touches anything that's been sprayed it is killed."

Mr Gohmert said the government was trying to get approval for the treatment in the US.

Madlin Mekelburg, of Politifact, fact-checked Mr Gohmert's claims in an article for the Houston Chronicle.

Head of the German Hospital Association, Dr Jörn Wegner, told Ms Mekelburg that the congressman's claims are incorrect.

"What your congressman said is absolute nonsense," Dr Wegner said. "There are no such tents and there's no powder or magical cure."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 29, 2020, 12:31:40 PM
In the cause of re-opening, Gohmert is trying to ensure his staff gets sick
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2020/07/29/why-the-capitol-needs-testing-489917
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 12:45:15 PM
Kinda scary and sad to say, but I believe that moron Gohmert is far from an outlier in the US House of Representatives.

And, as we've known all along:

https://news.yahoo.com/didnt-run-plays-ex-officials-trump-administration-didnt-081634259--abc-news-topstories.html

President Donald Trump proclaimed in late March that "nobody knew there'd be a pandemic or an epidemic of this proportion." Confronted with criticism of a lethargic national response, he lamented "a system we inherited" from past administrations.

The problem with both statements, according to former public health officials, is that prior administrations not only "knew there'd be a pandemic," they planned for it – extensively.

They did so by crafting so-called "playbooks" and engaging in "table-top exercises" for hypothetical outbreaks – the results of which bore a striking resemblance to gaps that have emerged in the federal government's response to COVID-19.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 29, 2020, 01:49:58 PM
Ayyup: criminal incompetence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 29, 2020, 02:53:52 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 29, 2020, 12:31:40 PM
In the cause of re-opening, Gohmert is trying to ensure his staff gets sick
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2020/07/29/why-the-capitol-needs-testing-489917

SHORTLY AFTER WE REPORTED that Rep. LOUIE GOHMERT (R-Texas) had tested positive for Covid-19, we got an email from one of his aides saying this:

"JAKE, THANK YOU for letting our office know Louie tested positive for the Coronavirus. When you write your story, can you include the fact that Louie requires full staff to be in the office, including three interns, so that 'we could be an example to America on how to open up safely.' When probing the office, you might want to ask how often were people berated for wearing masks."


What kind of reckless endangerment laws do they have in Texas?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 06:34:26 PM
Wrap your head around this s**t:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53579773

https://www.thedailybeast.com/stella-immanuel-trumps-new-covid-doctor-believes-in-alien-dna-demon-sperm-and-hydroxychloroquine

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-hails-demon-sperm-doc-dr-stella-immanuel-as-important-voice-in-nations-covid-19-battle

And this is truly remarkable:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-29/pandemic-advice-ignored-by-trump-helps-vietnam-fight-coronavirus

Country kept caseload low with CDC-backed plan, unlike U.S.

Even before Vietnam confirmed its first cases in late January, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc ordered officials to break out the blueprint developed in 2014 during a global health security project, funded in part by US-AID and created with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other organizations. Strict adherence to the plan allowed the country to claim victory over the virus this spring, stamping out clusters.

Faced with a resurgence that has similarly confounded Japan, Hong Kong and Australia, Vietnamese authorities are moving to contain a fresh cluster that has led to 36 new cases in the past week, for a total of 459 cases as of Thursday morning. Officials imposed strict quarantines on thousands of people who may have been exposed in the coastal city of Danang, reimposed stay-at-home measures and tightened border and immigration controls to prevent illegal entry. The government is now warning the virus could spread to other regions, including Ho Chi Minh City and the capital of Hanoi, where officials are suspending large gatherings such as religious activities and ordering bars to close.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2020, 11:13:02 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-30/melbourne-is-living-the-cold-weather-virus-surge-experts-fear
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 30, 2020, 06:34:45 AM
Dr. Fauci: Wear goggles or eye shields to prevent spread of COVID-19; flu vaccine a must (https://abcnews.go.com/US/dr-fauci-wear-goggles-eye-shields-prevent-spread/story?id=72059055)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 30, 2020, 06:38:39 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/30/former-gop-presidential-candidate-herman-cain-dies-after-battle-with-coronavirus.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 30, 2020, 01:22:29 PM
Sad to read this article about the effects on indigenous communities and how the virus is effecting them and disproportionally.  But they're fighting back....and on their own.  And about the problems that they are facing too.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200727-how-covid-19-could-destroy-indigenous-communities
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 30, 2020, 03:11:43 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 30, 2020, 06:38:39 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/30/former-gop-presidential-candidate-herman-cain-dies-after-battle-with-coronavirus.html

He died because he didn't know snake oil when it stared him full in the face:

David Frum: "The sad death of Herman Cain, a fatal victim of his need to prove his faith in Trump by attending an unmasked indoor rally, reminds me of this thread back in April about how Trump/Fox have broken faith with those who trusted them."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 30, 2020, 04:13:21 PM
Strange coincidence: yesterday, after reading about the lunatic fringe hydroxychloroquin touts, I wondered how Cain was doing. Then the story broke this morning.

I'd like to see COVID contact tracing analysis of the Tulsa rally, but of course the present CDC HHS is not going to publicize (or even conduct :o ) one.
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 30, 2020, 03:11:43 PM
He died because he didn't know snake oil when it stared him full in the face...

Gee, might the required signing of a release possibly have been a clue? There's a somewhat assholic Wall St. trader phrase "a tax on the stupid", which sadly appears applicable here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 30, 2020, 05:20:33 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 30, 2020, 04:13:21 PM
Strange coincidence: yesterday, after reading about the lunatic fringe hydroxychloroquin touts, I wondered how Cain was doing. Then the story broke this morning.

I'd like to see COVID contact tracing analysis of the Tulsa rally, but of course the present CDC HHS is not going to publicize (or even conduct :o ) one.
Gee, might the required signing of a release possibly have been a clue? There's a somewhat assholic Wall St. trader phrase "a tax on the stupid", which sadly appears applicable here.

Alas, yes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 31, 2020, 05:17:34 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-30/new-york-city-steels-itself-for-virus-to-return-in-the-fall
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:07:11 AM
Eurozone suffers deepest contraction on record (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53606101)

Coronavirus: US economy sees sharpest contraction in decades (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53574953)


We are toast..... ???

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 10:21:08 AM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:07:11 AM
Eurozone suffers deepest contraction on record (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53606101)

Coronavirus: US economy sees sharpest contraction in decades (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53574953)


We are toast..... ???

Q

On the long run, we're all dead.  There's much more wisdom in this than you'd think.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:32:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 10:21:08 AM
On the long run, we're all dead...  ;D

Absolutely, thanks for that...  :D

But after some eerie (geo)political similarities with the 1930's, we now get a global economic crisis as well.

I mean, I'm not particularly looking forward to living through a similar time period, but I guess we have no choice in the matter....  ::)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 10:37:57 AM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:32:18 AM
But after some eerie (geo)political similarities with the 1930's, we now get a global economic crisis as well.

Go ahead, make a prediction, it'll be retrospectively fun after a few years: who is the new Hitler, who is the new Mussolini, who is the new Stalin, who is the new Churchill and who is the new Roosevelt? As a Romanian, I can only hope there'll never be a new Yalta Conference.  ;D

EDIT: If you could also predict the new Franco, Salazar, Antonescu and Filov, that'd be a most welcome bonus.  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:54:20 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 10:37:57 AM
Go ahead, make a prediction, it'll be retrospectively fun after a few years: who is the new Hitler, who is the new Mussolini, who is the new Stalin, who is the new Churchill and who is the new Roosevelt? As a Romanian, I can only hope there'll never be another Yalta Conference.  ;D

As they say, history has a tendency to repeat itself, but never in an identical way.

So, there won't be a Hitler or Mussolini. But we're looking at a major political (US & EU) and geopolitical crises and shifts, a climate crisis and a global economic crisis. I hope there won't be a major war, though some already make predictions to that effect. Local armed conflicts over natural resources seem not unlikely, like over water... see currently the case of Egypt vs Ethiopia.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 31, 2020, 11:19:49 AM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:54:20 AM
As they say, history has a tendency to repeat itself, but never in an identical way.

So, there won't be a Hitler or Mussolini. But we're looking at a major political (US & EU) and geopolitical crises and shifts, a climate crisis and a global economic crisis. I hope there won't be a major war, though some already make predictions to that effect. Local armed conflicts over natural resources seem not unlikely, like over water... see currently the case of Egypt vs Ethiopia.

Q
I was reading about Egypt and Ethiopia and the dam...I think that it was yesterday (BBC online).  Not looking good for Egypt!  No agreement as to exactly how much water they will be allotted...and if I'm recalling correctly, in terms of what they were getting water-wise in terms of need, it was already slightly less than half for the number of people there.   :(  In any event, yeah, I'm expecting rough times ahead too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 31, 2020, 11:19:56 AM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:54:20 AMAs they say, history has a tendency to repeat itself, but never in an identical way.


Trinity literally changed everything as it pertains to great power warfare.  Smaller regional wars and proxy wars will continue, but the world has a fundamentally different geostrategic reality than it did seventy-five years ago.  Endless comparisons to the 1930s have severe flaws.  A better comparison to today would be the unravelling of the Concert of Europe, but that is also a woefully inadequate analog.  The Britain-US vs Britain-Germany comparisons when considering the US and China may be more instructive, but those are inadequate in scale and cultural differentiation to be as useful as their proponents claim.  It seems that many people cannot get over their Eurocentric or Americentric views.  The world has changed, and there are no true historical analogs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 11:38:09 AM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:54:20 AM
As they say, history has a tendency to repeat itself, but never in an identical way.

Whoever they are, they talk nonsense. "Repeating itself but never in an identical way" is nonsense.

QuoteSo, there won't be a Hitler or Mussolini.

Of course there won't be. Nor will there be any Franco, Salazar, Amtonescu, Filov or Horthy. The analogy with 1930s is deeply flawed.

QuoteBut we're looking at a major political ... and geopolitical crises and shifts, a climate crisis and a global economic crisis.
[/quote]

Is this really any worrying news? Worse than the Black Death? Worse than the 30 Years War? Worse than the Great War? Worse than WWII? Just today I've overheard on the radio a Romanian philosopher claiming that the history of the humankind is essentially a long list of disasters. I think this is bull. One simple question: how come that after all those many disasters, one worse than the other, the humankind is still alive?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 31, 2020, 01:41:34 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2020, 11:38:09 AM
Is this really any worrying news? Worse than the Black Death? Worse than the 30 Years War? Worse than the Great War? Worse than WWII? Just today I've overheard on the radio a Romanian philosopher claiming that the history of the humankind is essentially a long list of disasters. I think this is bull. One simple question: how come that after all those many disasters, one worse than the other, the humankind is still alive?

I wasn't suggesting that these are the end times!  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 31, 2020, 02:41:18 PM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:54:20 AM
As they say, history has a tendency to repeat itself, but never in an identical way.


The quote attributed to Mark Twain is "history doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on July 31, 2020, 06:15:24 PM
Quote from: Que on July 31, 2020, 10:07:11 AM
Eurozone suffers deepest contraction on record (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53606101)

Coronavirus: US economy sees sharpest contraction in decades (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53574953)


We are toast..... ???

Q

May I point out that the Eurozone statistics only go back to 1995?
And while severe the decline is not particularly steep. For every hundred bottles of beer you were producing this time last year you are now producing eighty.

More importantly, since you seem to have the virus under control as much as it can be controlled, you can look forward to recovering some of that lost ground more quickly than us Americans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2020, 06:17:47 PM
Quote from: JBS on July 31, 2020, 06:15:24 PM
May I point out that the Eurozone statistics only go back to 1995?
And while severe the decline is not particularly steep. For every hundred bottles of beer you were producing this time last year you are now producing eighty.

More importantly, since you seem to have the virus under control as much as it can be controlled, you can look forward to recovering some of that lost ground more quickly than us Americans.

Aye, quite the hole (might even say, grave) we're digging.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 31, 2020, 11:19:26 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 31, 2020, 02:41:18 PM
The quote attributed to Mark Twain is "history doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes"

A much better way of putting it!  :)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on August 01, 2020, 12:19:06 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 31, 2020, 02:41:18 PM
The quote attributed to Mark Twain is "history doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes"

Haha, excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 01, 2020, 04:37:29 AM
Quote from: JBS on July 31, 2020, 06:15:24 PMAnd while severe the decline is not particularly steep.


I should like to see this framework of economic analysis developed more fully.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 01, 2020, 07:21:21 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 30, 2020, 06:38:39 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/30/former-gop-presidential-candidate-herman-cain-dies-after-battle-with-coronavirus.html

When he asked his doctor if there is hope for recovery the doctor must have answered "NEIN, NEIN NEIN!"  :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 01, 2020, 09:16:25 AM

     The ~8% quarterly decline in GDP featured a huge increase in personal income on the order of $1.5T. We should get right to work building a 900 ft. statue to Nancy Pelosi.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 01, 2020, 09:49:20 AM
Coronavirus: Russia plans mass vaccination campaign in October (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53621708)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 01, 2020, 03:04:25 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-01/arizona-lawmaker-raul-grijalva-tests-positive-for-covid-19

Democratic House member attended same hearing as Gohmert
Texas Republican Gohmert tested positive day after hearing

Democratic Representative Raul Grijalva says he's been infected with the coronavirus, a few days after a Capitol Hill hearing where a Republican House member in attendance later tested positive for Covid-19.

Grijalva, who issued a statement saying he isn't exhibiting any symptoms, has been self-isolating at his home in Washington since Wednesday upon learning that Texas Republican Representative Louie Gohmert tested positive. Grijalva presided over a hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee a day earlier.

"While I cannot blame anyone directly for this, this week has shown that there are some Members of Congress who fail to take this crisis seriously," said the Arizona Democrat. "Numerous Republican members routinely strut around the Capitol without a mask to selfishly make a political statement at the expense of their colleagues, staff, and their families."




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-31/japan-acted-like-the-virus-had-gone-now-it-s-spread-everywhere

Japan Acted Like the Virus Had Gone. Now It's Spread Everywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 01, 2020, 07:04:17 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 01, 2020, 07:21:21 AM
When he asked his doctor if there is hope for recovery the doctor must have answered "NEIN, NEIN NEIN!"  :-X

Well played!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 02, 2020, 04:48:20 AM
Here's a testing anecdote:

My brother lives in Queens, NY, practically at the COVID epicenter. He just spent 2 months upstate (Ulster Co.) to get a break. Four days before returning, a cafe from which he had often purchased take-out closed (I assume for 2 weeks) because an employee had become ill with COVID symptoms (results unknown). My brother and his family all got tested. In New York, a state which brags about testing prowess, the results took a week to come back. Fortunately negative so far (still waiting on one).

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-fauci-wrong-europe-us-covid-013527485.html


Also, from Bloomberg:

Australia's Victoria Tightens Lockdown (1:16 p.m. HK)
Australia's Victoria state tightened restrictions and declared a state of disaster after its outbreak showed no signs of abating three weeks after capital Melbourne was put under lockdown.

State Premier Daniel Andrews announced 671 new cases in the past 24 hours with seven deaths. More than 380 people were in hospital, with 38 in intensive care.

Andrews said he would declare a state of disaster from 6 p.m. tonight, which would give police added powers. Metropolitan Melbourne would be under a curfew limiting movement between 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. The new restrictions will be in force for six weeks.


Shows how approaches differ...in most US states, those Victoria numbers would be "odd lots" and no one would bat an eyelash.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 02, 2020, 04:52:21 AM
How a packed slum in Mumbai beat back the coronavirus, as India's cases continue to soar (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/how-a-packed-slum-in-mumbai-beat-back-the-coronavirus-as-indias-cases-continue-to-soar/2020/07/30/da859532-d039-11ea-826b-cc394d824e35_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_virus-mumbai422pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 02, 2020, 09:44:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 01, 2020, 07:04:17 PM
Well played!

One tries... ...thanks!  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 02, 2020, 11:29:55 AM
Australian state [Victoria] declares coronavirus 'state of disaster,' South Africa tops 500,000 cases (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/australian-state-declares-coronavirus-state-disaster-south-africa-tops-500-n1235603)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 02, 2020, 03:31:40 PM
To the surprise of practically no one:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53598965

The number of deaths from coronavirus in Iran is nearly triple what Iran's government claims, a BBC Persian service investigation has found.

The government's own records appear to show almost 42,000 people died with Covid-19 symptoms up to 20 July, versus 14,405 reported by its health ministry.

The number of people known to be infected is also almost double official figures: 451,024 as opposed to 278,827.


And some observations from Scott Gottlieb, see
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-02/california-cases-accelerate-birx-sees-new-phase-virus-update

Gottlieb Advocates Masks, Targeted Mitigation (4:07 p.m. NY)

Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said he hopes "the combination of masks with some targeted mitigation" is enough to keep Covid-19 cases down in the U.S. He proposed that approach as a "happy medium" between strict lockdowns and unchecked spread.

"It's going to be hard to keep the virus out," Gottlieb said on CBS. "We're likely to see this continue, where there will be these epidemics in different parts of the country, and compensatory action to get it under control."

Even as cases ebb in the Sun Belt, infection rates are picking up in the Midwest. Across the country, "probably one in 70 individuals right now are actively infected," he said.

Asked to reach for a note of optimism, Gottlieb said it looks like the U.S. flu season this fall and winter will be less harsh than expected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on August 02, 2020, 06:02:21 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 01, 2020, 07:21:21 AM
When he asked his doctor if there is hope for recovery the doctor must have answered "NEIN, NEIN NEIN!"  :-X

I guffawed, but no one -- not even a clown like Herman Cane -- should have to be a martyr to this maladministration's malign incompetence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 03, 2020, 02:18:56 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/WkZKDkb/scarecrow.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 03, 2020, 03:20:45 AM
Quote from: Daverz on August 02, 2020, 06:02:21 PM
I guffawed, but no one -- not even a clown like Herman Cane -- should have to be a martyr to this maladministration's malign incompetence.

Totally agreed and while I had zero respect for the man I would have never wished him this faith. It's just that the level of stupidity, ignorance and arrogance in the US regarding the Covid-19 situation is not only devastating, but also nothing sort of comical and a clown like Herman Cain (not Cane) makes it too easy to come up with these jokes.  :P

The last few years have felt like watching four years long "dictator's cut" of the movie Idiocracy (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1). I like the movie, but I hate the reality.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 03, 2020, 04:29:00 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 03, 2020, 03:20:45 AM
Totally agreed and while I had zero respect for the man I would have never wished him this faith. It's just that the level of stupidity, ignorance and arrogance in the US regarding the Covid-19 situation is not only devastating, but also nothing sort of comical and a clown like Herman Cain (not Cane) makes it too easy to come up with these jokes.  :P

The last few years have felt like watching four years long "dictator's cut" of the movie Idiocracy (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1). I like the movie, but I hate the reality.

Recall that the clown was nominated by the Orange Swindler for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board! Thankfully that didn't fly. I'll bite my tongue and refrain from further comment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 03, 2020, 04:50:47 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 03, 2020, 04:29:00 AM
Recall that the clown was nominated by the Orange Swindler for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board! Thankfully that didn't fly. I'll bite my tongue and refrain from further comment.

Yes, and considering what type of people the Orange One has chosen to various seats and positions Herman Cain certainly wasn't a surprising nomination.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 03, 2020, 07:54:14 AM
Coming soon...the COVID ride!

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/08/02/annual-sturgis-rally-coronavirus-concerns/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 03, 2020, 08:32:57 AM
I heard a radio ad that renewed my faith in humanity, or at least ad men.  It starts with a lead-in saying "Stories from the Old World" and then segues to a hostess yelling out "Thomson, table of four!  Thomson, table of four!  Oh, there you are."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 03, 2020, 01:10:48 PM
Time is running out with handling the Covid-19 so they are banning Tik Tok. Trump is thinking:


Before I leave the White House, brush my teeth with a bottle of Hydroxychloroquine
'Cause when I leave for the night, I ain't coming back

Tick tock on the clock
But the pandemic don't stop, no"


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on August 03, 2020, 01:47:14 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/TYT3hqRJ/Nre7bHU.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/david-nagy-obituary/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 03, 2020, 04:17:19 PM
Ouch !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 04, 2020, 03:47:25 AM
Long but a good read:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/coronavirus-american-failure/614191/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 04, 2020, 03:54:38 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 04, 2020, 03:47:25 AM
Long but a good read:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/coronavirus-american-failure/614191/ (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/coronavirus-american-failure/614191/)

Thanks!

Meanwhile, the imbecile in the White House:

https://www.youtube.com/v/WQsLvvEdyOk
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 04, 2020, 06:00:31 AM
A slight increase in the number of infected here in Denmark, as it was expected due to the general summer buzz, the loosened attitude and the tourism flux - now seemingly to result in political measures to delay the plans for further opening up, or even rolling it back. Still, the situation here is good by comparison to most other countries, yet still rather stressful for the citizens who care.

And a slight strengthening of mask policy - for the first time so far, it is now recommended during busy hours in public transport, but that's all.

On the positive side, much less crime since February, less traffic accidents and fatalities, less flu, etc.

  Regarding countries, only Norway seems to have experienced a decidedly positive economic development during the virus however. Contrary to some predictions, Swedish economy apparently hasn't benefitted a lot from the chosen strategy; BNP shrunk by 8.6 % in the second quarter of 2020, compared to the same quarter last year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 04, 2020, 01:55:15 PM
Quote from: geralmar on August 04, 2020, 11:47:09 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/PxV4yn4t/Eei-N4fc-U0-AE7q-XL.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

First Day of School, Senior Class Photo
Etowah High School
Cherokee County, Georgia, USA
3 August, 2020

Not a mask on a single face
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 04, 2020, 03:37:50 PM

     Mississippi Guv Makes Masks Mandatory for Two Weeks (https://www.thedailybeast.com/mississippi-gov-tate-reeves-issues-two-week-statewide-mask-mandate?ref=home)

"I want to see college football," Reeves said. "The best way for that to occur is for us all to realize is that wearing a mask, as irritating as that can be & I promise I hate it more than anyone watching, is critical."

     I like pro football, and that takes 3 weeks at least.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 04, 2020, 04:06:11 PM
https://news.yahoo.com/doctors-opinions-dime-dozen-trump-204511629.html

In an administration full of what might charitably be termed "dim bulbs", Mr. Navarro is determined to stand out!

'Doctors' opinions are a dime a dozen': Trump adviser Navarro again ignores experts, touts hydroxychloroquine
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 04, 2020, 04:09:59 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 04, 2020, 01:55:15 PM
Not a mask on a single face

No black or brown faces either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 04, 2020, 04:14:05 PM
Quote from: André on August 04, 2020, 04:09:59 PM
No black or brown faces either.

Meanwhile in Cherokee County, Georgia (see photo caption above):

On the second day of in-person classes, Cherokee County schools officials said Tuesday that an elementary school class will have to quarantine because a student tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

https://www.tribuneledgernews.com/local_news/bigstory/sixes-elementary-school-classroom-must-close-students-quarantine-following-positive-virus-test/article_a0ac7bf2-d695-11ea-b1f9-7fbae1ea1b02.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 04, 2020, 04:30:54 PM
Yahoo News/YouGov coronavirus poll: Number of Americans who plan to get vaccinated falls to 42% — a new low (https://news.yahoo.com/yahoo-news-you-gov-coronavirus-poll-number-of-americans-who-plan-to-get-vaccinated-falls-to-42-percent-a-new-low-162000936.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 04, 2020, 05:12:02 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 04, 2020, 04:14:05 PM
Meanwhile in Cherokee County, Georgia (see photo caption above):

On the second day of in-person classes, Cherokee County schools officials said Tuesday that an elementary school class will have to quarantine because a student tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

https://www.tribuneledgernews.com/local_news/bigstory/sixes-elementary-school-classroom-must-close-students-quarantine-following-positive-virus-test/article_a0ac7bf2-d695-11ea-b1f9-7fbae1ea1b02.html (https://www.tribuneledgernews.com/local_news/bigstory/sixes-elementary-school-classroom-must-close-students-quarantine-following-positive-virus-test/article_a0ac7bf2-d695-11ea-b1f9-7fbae1ea1b02.html)



Well, who could have foreseen that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 01:04:05 AM
https://sports.yahoo.com/eastern-kentucky-kicker-quits-coaches-dont-care-player-safety-coronavirus-covid19-pandemic-walt-wells-033826711.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 05, 2020, 05:19:21 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 04, 2020, 04:30:54 PM
Yahoo News/YouGov coronavirus poll: Number of Americans who plan to get vaccinated falls to 42% — a new low (https://news.yahoo.com/yahoo-news-you-gov-coronavirus-poll-number-of-americans-who-plan-to-get-vaccinated-falls-to-42-percent-a-new-low-162000936.html)

I'd like to ask the anti-vaxxers if they think autism is worse than death. That's what I have always wondered: Even if vaccinations caused autism, is it too high price to defeat a virus? Apparently it is.

Maybe it's because US society is super-extrovert, autism which makes people super-introvert is scary as hell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 06:57:21 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 05, 2020, 05:19:21 AM
I'd like to ask the anti-vaxxers if they think autism is worse than death. That's what I have always wondered: Even if vaccinations caused autism, is it too high price to defeat a virus? Apparently it is.

Maybe it's because US society is super-extrovert, autism which makes people super-introvert is scary as hell.

I don't think those anti-vaxxers (dopey though they are) are such a big part of it.
A very large percentage of Republicans polled say that they will not be vaccinated because the vaccine will contain Bill Gates-implanted tracking microchips. No shit, I'm totally serious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 05, 2020, 07:07:49 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 06:57:21 AM
I very large percentage of Republicans polled say that they will not be vaccinated because the vaccine will contain Bill Gates-implanted tracking microchips. No shit, I'm totally serious.


Do you have a link to these polls?  The one I linked didn't mention Bill Gates. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 07:14:02 AM
Google for instance the character string

bbc coronavirus vaccine tracking microchips

One hit:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/06/05/coronavirus-vaccine-bill-gates-microchip-conspiracy-theory-false/3146133001/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 05, 2020, 07:22:19 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 07:14:02 AM
Google for instance the character string

bbc coronavirus vaccine tracking microchips

One hit:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/06/05/coronavirus-vaccine-bill-gates-microchip-conspiracy-theory-false/3146133001/


That Yahoo link, unlike the one I included, does not appear to provide a hot link to the actual survey results.  In the article I linked, if one reads the article, one will read a misrepresentation of Democrat views on the vaccine and why some of them will not get vaccinated.  Surely the article you cited is accurate and not at all misleading. 

Anyway, of course there are dumbshits who believe in vaccine conspiracies.  That's just another reason why it's important to get vaccinated when a safe vaccine becomes available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 12:22:46 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/05/dr-fauci-agrees-the-us-has-the-worst-coronvirus-outbreak-in-the-world-the-numbers-dont-lie.html

The U.S., which accounts for less than 5% of the world population, leads all other countries in global coronavirus infections and deaths. The nation represents more than 22% of global coronavirus deaths and more than 25% of infections as of Wednesday, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

We're Number One!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 05, 2020, 01:14:44 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 12:22:46 PM
We're Number One!

Not the only thing the US is number one:

- Number of incarcerated citizens per capita
- Number of adults who believe angels are real
- Defense spending
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 05, 2020, 01:15:53 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 12:22:46 PMWe're Number One!


Unless you combine Europe and treat it as a whole, in which case they lead with 205,000+ deaths.  But you don't do that for a reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 05, 2020, 01:20:31 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 05, 2020, 06:57:21 AM
I don't think those anti-vaxxers (dopey though they are) are such a big part of it.
A very large percentage of Republicans polled say that they will not be vaccinated because the vaccine will contain Bill Gates-implanted tracking microchips. No shit, I'm totally serious.

Oh, you are so right! My mistake. I forgot the "real" reason. Who knows, maybe Soros is tampering the vaccine so that anyone who gets it will turn into a zombie communist!  ???  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 05, 2020, 01:24:58 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 02, 2020, 04:48:20 AM
Here's a testing anecdote:

My brother lives in Queens, NY, practically at the COVID epicenter. He just spent 2 months upstate (Ulster Co.) to get a break. Four days before returning, a cafe from which he had often purchased take-out closed (I assume for 2 weeks) because an employee had become ill with COVID symptoms (results unknown). My brother and his family all got tested. In New York, a state which brags about testing prowess, the results took a week to come back. Fortunately negative so far (still waiting on one).

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-fauci-wrong-europe-us-covid-013527485.html


Also, from Bloomberg:

Australia's Victoria Tightens Lockdown (1:16 p.m. HK)
Australia's Victoria state tightened restrictions and declared a state of disaster after its outbreak showed no signs of abating three weeks after capital Melbourne was put under lockdown.

State Premier Daniel Andrews announced 671 new cases in the past 24 hours with seven deaths. More than 380 people were in hospital, with 38 in intensive care.

Andrews said he would declare a state of disaster from 6 p.m. tonight, which would give police added powers. Metropolitan Melbourne would be under a curfew limiting movement between 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. The new restrictions will be in force for six weeks.


Shows how approaches differ...in most US states, those Victoria numbers would be "odd lots" and no one would bat an eyelash.
TD, so sorry about the health scare to your brother (and his family?).  I have heard (a few days ago) that it no longer mattered whether one lived in a city vs. the country as the results in less-populated counties has been on the rise--not just in the more populated areas.  Hope that all is well for him and any family and you too.  Note:  from what I caught via radio, I believe that it has to do with people vacationing elsewhere then coming back home.  I imagine that this would vary due to how much people are going outside of their local area.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 05, 2020, 01:42:15 PM
Quote from: Todd on August 05, 2020, 01:15:53 PM

Unless you combine Europe and treat it as a whole, in which case they lead with 205,000+ deaths.  But you don't do that for a reason.

I think it was me who teached people here to compare the US to the entire Europe instead of small Finland. See how it's working?  ;)
Yes, if we take the Europe as a whole, it's not so rosy. I admit it because I am principled.

North America (population similar to Europe) as a whole is at about 227,000 deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on August 05, 2020, 02:20:57 PM
Quote from: Todd on August 05, 2020, 01:15:53 PM

Unless you combine Europe and treat it as a whole, in which case they lead with 205,000+ deaths.  But you don't do that for a reason.

Perhaps a good reason?: Europe isn't a single, strongly centralized political unit like the U.S. (used to be before Trump ;)) So, if ones point is to highlight the relative effectiveness of health policy and mitigation measures undertaken by different governments, then a nation to nation comparison adjusted for population makes more sense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 05, 2020, 03:03:24 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on August 05, 2020, 02:20:57 PM
Perhaps a good reason?: Europe isn't a single, strongly centralized political unit like the U.S. (used to be before Trump ;))


No, that's not the reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 06, 2020, 02:11:13 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 05, 2020, 08:46:03 PM
I don't quite see justification for claiming the U.S. is "the worst." The U.S. has the most deaths, but the U.S. also has a larger population than every other country except China and India. Per capita numbers are more relevant, and apparently we are number 8. Oddly, Belgium is the worst. One thing against the U.S. is that for the other developed countries Covid-19 infections have been dropping while in the U.S. they have continued to increase dramatically. Eighth from the bottom is pretty bad and we may yet achieve the worst deaths, per capita.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/08/05/899365887/charts-how-the-u-s-ranks-on-covid-19-deaths-per-capita-and-by-case-count

Size creates a strong distortion of the real picture. For a long time the infection will be locally concentrated, so a large population evens out bad local numbers. This is why a small country like Belgium scores high while the situation in Italy and Spain was actually as bad, if not worse. Numbers don't tell in what stage the epidemic is in (behind Europe) or whether the spread of the infection has been successfully contained  (not, unlike most European countries).

Coronavirus: How the pandemic in US compares with rest of world (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52771783) (BBC)

There is a lot of uncertainty about number of deaths. The most reliable method is to look at the statistics and determine the number of "excess deaths" compared to previous years.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 06, 2020, 05:24:27 PM
Coronavirus: Los Angeles to shut off water and power to party houses (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53680761)

I thought shutting off water was a human rights violation.  Not any more, I guess. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 07, 2020, 02:24:03 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 06, 2020, 05:24:27 PM
Coronavirus: Los Angeles to shut off water and power to party houses (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53680761)

I thought shutting off water was a human rights violation.  Not any more, I guess.

More interesting to me is to know how do they "spy" people to know where and when parties are kept?
Is it based on neighbours calling the police about loud music?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 07, 2020, 02:37:30 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 06, 2020, 05:24:27 PM
Coronavirus: Los Angeles to shut off water and power to party houses (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53680761)

I thought shutting off water was a human rights violation.  Not any more, I guess.

Is it a human right , if you are ill with corona, to spread it to anybody else as much as you like?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 07, 2020, 02:59:40 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 05, 2020, 08:46:03 PM
I don't quite see justification for claiming the U.S. is "the worst." The U.S. has the most deaths, but the U.S. also has a larger population than every other country except China and India. Per capita numbers are more relevant, and apparently we are number 8. Oddly, Belgium is the worst. One thing against the U.S. is that for the other developed countries Covid-19 infections have been dropping while in the U.S. they have continued to increase dramatically. Eighth from the bottom is pretty bad and we may yet achieve the worst deaths, per capita.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/08/05/899365887/charts-how-the-u-s-ranks-on-covid-19-deaths-per-capita-and-by-case-count

I don't think the US is "THE worst" in handling the coronavirus, but it's among the countries which have handled it poorly. Countries are different. Some countries are densely populated, some other countiries are not. Some countries are isolated, some other counties are not. For example Africa has been hit by Covid-19 so far very little compared to Europe or the US. Having the exact same coronavirus measures in every country would give different results because countries are different. Densely populated Belgium in the middle of Europe needs drastically stronger measures than for example sparsely populated Finland to have the same results in controlling the spread of coronavirus. Every country and also every region within countries need to adjust their measures accordingly (for example so that the R number is 0.8 or lower). In many places this is easy and hardly anything has to be be done. Wash your hands and do some social distancing and that's it. In large cities it takes more effort.  The US has failed to follow this principle as a whole and that puts the US among the countries which have handled the crisis poorly. The US could have done much better (say have "only" 1/4 of the death rate is has).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 07, 2020, 04:26:53 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on August 07, 2020, 02:37:30 AM
Is it a human right , if you are ill with corona, to spread it to anybody else as much as you like?


A perfect example of whataboutery. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 07, 2020, 04:39:21 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 07, 2020, 04:26:53 AM

A perfect example of whataboutery.

You  may call it whatever you want. But in fact it is a simple question, which can be answered as such.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 07, 2020, 04:44:04 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on August 07, 2020, 04:39:21 AM
You  may call it whatever you want. But in fact it is a simple question, which can be answered as such.


Incorrect. 

International treaties and domestic case law prohibit arbitrarily shutting off water, which is deemed a human right.  In the case of Los Angeles, the city is using coercive power to violate human rights.  People will leap to defend the action.  That is the best thing about public health.  It is the best tool in the toolbox to get the populace to embrace authoritarianism.  And they get to feel righteous while doing so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 07, 2020, 05:03:01 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 07, 2020, 04:44:04 AM

Incorrect. 

International treaties and domestic case law prohibit arbitrarily shutting off water, which is deemed a human right.  In the case of Los Angeles, the city is using coercive power to violate human rights.  People will leap to defend the action.  That is the best thing about public health.  It is the best way tool in the toolbox to get the populace to embrace authoritarianism.  And they get to feel righteous while doing so.

As I understand it it's only about a very local shutting off of the water. People will be able to get water from elsewhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 07, 2020, 05:29:04 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on August 07, 2020, 05:03:01 AM
As I understand it it's only about a very local shutting off of the water. People will be able to get water from elsewhere.


And so authorities shutting off water becomes acceptable.  That's how things go.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on August 07, 2020, 05:00:47 PM
You can also get the water shut off if you do not pay your water bill.

We can shut off water to the poor and homeless but it is immoral to shut off water to rich brats.

Another false equivalency brought to you by Todd.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 07, 2020, 06:01:10 PM
Must be that fine mental edge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on August 09, 2020, 12:10:11 AM
Quote from: Todd on August 05, 2020, 01:15:53 PM

Unless you combine Europe and treat it as a whole, in which case they lead with 205,000+ deaths.  But you don't do that for a reason.

Not sure what you mean when you say "Europe"  -  a geographical unit, or a political entity  -  but when one is talking absolute nrs, like people dead from corona, it would help if you mentioned the EU is currently 445 million pop, so, at least a 110 million larger, or 130 percent compared to the USA's 100%. "But you don't mention that for a reason"?

Also there is the matter of how the corona deaths books are cooked...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 09, 2020, 07:09:19 AM
Three days for that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on August 09, 2020, 09:34:48 AM
Sorry, I'm not obsessively monitoring and critiqueing posts as soon as they are posted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 09, 2020, 09:54:12 AM
Quote from: Herman on August 09, 2020, 09:34:48 AM
Sorry, I'm not obsessively monitoring and critiqueing posts as soon as they are posted.


You are today, though, I see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 10, 2020, 11:00:36 AM
Fauci tells Americans to be mindful of these important limitations about any future coronavirus vaccine (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fauci-says-public-should-temper-expectations-on-covid-19-vaccine-as-us-infections-near-5-million-2020-08-09?mod=mark-hulbert)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 10, 2020, 01:23:23 PM
Two more coronavirus deaths in Finland: Now the count is 333.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on August 10, 2020, 04:31:08 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/GpfcdGHC/22359144-web1-M-0810-covid-schools-anderson-EDH-200807-640x512.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on August 10, 2020, 05:34:03 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^
I love it  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 11, 2020, 01:58:31 AM
Some info on the announced, new Russian vaccine, called Sputnik V, apparently to be used for mass distribution within a couple of months.
The news should be taken with a grain of salt, or more, though.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/08/11/putin-announces-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-a71112
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/russia-registers-virus-vaccine-putins-daughter-72300985?cid=social_twitter_abcn
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on August 11, 2020, 04:04:54 AM
"Putin ordered state officials to shorten the time of clinical trials for potential coronavirus vaccines", mentions the second link.

That means that any number of deaths may occur as a consequence of an insuffiently tested vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 12, 2020, 01:10:10 PM
Things are going sideways....

Coronavirus in Europe: Infections surge in France, Germany and Spain (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53747852)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 12, 2020, 01:31:13 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 11, 2020, 01:58:31 AM
Some info on the announced, new Russian vaccine, called Sputnik V, apparently to be used for mass distribution within a couple of months.
The news should be taken with a grain of salt, or more, though.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/08/11/putin-announces-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-a71112
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/russia-registers-virus-vaccine-putins-daughter-72300985?cid=social_twitter_abcn
I'm scared for the people of Russia!

Quote from: Que on August 12, 2020, 01:10:10 PM
Things are going sideways....

Coronavirus in Europe: Infections surge in France, Germany and Spain (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53747852)

Oh, God....don't know what to say, but you have my sympathies ....and support.

PD

P.S. I'm trying to fix this quoting, but alas, I am failing....pardon! fxd
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on August 12, 2020, 11:05:15 PM
Quote from: Que on August 12, 2020, 01:10:10 PM
Things are going sideways....

Coronavirus in Europe: Infections surge in France, Germany and Spain (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53747852)
There is the persistent problem that all these number never distinguish between positive test results and "people being actually sick", thus including all false positive tests and all symptonless patients as "infection cases" and the only other number we get are deaths (which are very low in Germany). (For other numbers one has to search but serious cases are also very low and have been all the time.)
I actually would have expected numbers to rise considerably already in June when many of the restrictions were lifted to some degree and was surprised that nobody commented on the very low infection numbers (500 or so per day) for many weeks in June and July. As things had been presented in March/April I would certainly have expected much higher numbers with loosened restrictions. So I am not surprised now but 1000-1500 per day is still not very much for a large country (and again much information is lost by summing/averaging because regionally it is very low in many places). What also annoys me is that the generally accepted way is now  (as in March) more restriction on everybody, including high fines for not wearing masks etc. instead of curbing unnecessary travel and focussing on hot spots.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 12, 2020, 11:42:54 PM
Quote from: Jo498 on August 12, 2020, 11:05:15 PM
There is the persistent problem that all these number never distinguish between positive test results and "people being actually sick", thus including all false positive tests and all symptonless patients as "infection cases" and the only other number we get are deaths (which are very low in Germany). (For other numbers one has to search but serious cases are also very low and have been all the time.)
I actually would have expected numbers to rise considerably already in June when many of the restrictions were lifted to some degree and was surprised that nobody commented on the very low infection numbers (500

I've not seen any information on the expectation of false positives from the swab test. Do you have anything?


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on August 13, 2020, 12:48:30 AM
Sorry, I cannot be more specific. I am a layman as well and many of the websites writing about the test specificity are cranky and mention up to 30% of false positives. There are different tests and they have different rates of false positive results. The rate of false positive for one? common test is around 1% which happens to be about the same as the positive return rate in Germany, i.e. there are so many people being tested, most of which are not infected that the number of tests will clearly have an influence. (1% false positives is not a big deal if 50% of those tested are infected but it seriously skews results if only 1% are.)

With some digging I found official numbers for patients in Intensive Care for Germany, as of Tuesday, 11t it was 234. Comparsion 1st of July 329, 1st of June 677, 1st of May 2.189. So there are similar rates of "new infections" (positive test results) per day as in May but there were 9 times as many patients in IC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 13, 2020, 01:27:41 AM
Thanks. It's complicated!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 13, 2020, 01:37:55 AM
Quote from: Jo498 on August 13, 2020, 12:48:30 AM
(...)

With some digging I found official numbers for patients in Intensive Care for Germany, as of Tuesday, 11t it was 234. Comparsion 1st of July 329, 1st of June 677, 1st of May 2.189. So there are similar rates of "new infections" (positive test results) per day as in May but there were 9 times as many patients in IC.

We also have more people being tested positive, but a strong decrease in the number of people in IC, and without the numbers of tests going up that much. I have difficulties seeing the lower IC numbers being the result of better treatment. It could be that more younger people are getting the virus, cf summer socializing for instance, with less serious results. But I don't know; it is also known that immigrants now form an unusual large share of new cases ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 13, 2020, 04:03:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 13, 2020, 01:37:55 AM
We also have more people being tested positive, but a strong decrease in the number of people in IC, and without the numbers of tests going up that much. I have difficulties seeing the lower IC numbers being the result of better treatment. It could be that more younger people are getting the virus, cf summer socializing for instance, with less serious results. But I don't know; it is also known that immigrants now form an unusual large share of new cases ...

I don't know. The treatment (medication) starts when the patients get in need of oxygene, and may in some cases result in reduced need of respirator and also shorten the duration of hospitalisation. (But so far I don't think we have any studies on the actual effect of treatment.) So treatment may contribute a bit to the low hospitalisation numbers. But as you wrote above it may partly be caused by the fact that the sick population at the moment is young people not in need of much treatment. The people in the vulnerable group take more care of themselves and don't contract the disease as much as before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on August 13, 2020, 06:22:30 AM
Anecdotally, that is, from interviews with front line doctors in ICU wards in the U.S., treatment measures are considerably more effective now than at the onset of the plague. Notable is the use of two drugs, a corticosteroid, dexamethasone, and an antiviral, Remdesivir, effective at mitigating symptoms, shortening hospitalizations, and reducing the rate of fatality. It seems there have been other innovations that make a difference as well, including something as basic as patients being kept lying on their stomachs rather than on their backs and keeping non-hospitalized patients on supplemental oxygen.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 13, 2020, 10:50:21 AM
The world is spending nowhere near enough on a coronavirus vaccine

Far better to spend far too much (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/08/08/the-world-is-spending-nowhere-near-enough-on-a-coronavirus-vaccine)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 13, 2020, 10:23:00 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 11, 2020, 01:58:31 AM
Some info on the announced, new Russian vaccine, called Sputnik V, apparently to be used for mass distribution within a couple of months.
The news should be taken with a grain of salt, or more, though.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/08/11/putin-announces-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-a71112
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/russia-registers-virus-vaccine-putins-daughter-72300985?cid=social_twitter_abcn

The report about the vaccine says, according to the Russian newspaper Fontanka, that 'Sputnik V' can only be given to people between 18 and 60 years of age, not to pregnant or breast-feeding women, that 144 side-effects have been identified among 38 studied test persons, etc.
And as it has already been mentioned, the Phase 3 with mass testing, took place on a very limited level.

Experts here say that any initial vaccines may have to be substituted later on with new, updated or improved ones, but that they will very likely be available at least in 2021.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 13, 2020, 10:36:15 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on August 13, 2020, 06:22:30 AM
Anecdotally, that is, from interviews with front line doctors in ICU wards in the U.S., treatment measures are considerably more effective now than at the onset of the plague. Notable is the use of two drugs, a corticosteroid, dexamethasone, and an antiviral, Remdesivir, effective at mitigating symptoms, shortening hospitalizations, and reducing the rate of fatality. It seems there have been other innovations that make a difference as well, including something as basic as patients being kept lying on their stomachs rather than on their backs and keeping non-hospitalized patients on supplemental oxygen.

Yes, I mentioned that myself earlier, but when you go down from say 30 to 1 patient in intensive care, some other factors must be at play.

Quote from: MusicTurner on May 23, 2020, 09:24:39 AM
Some generally positive news:

- The press and doctors here are very glad about it, calling it incredible news etc.: a series of studies of Remdesivir, though still not concluded, seem to suggest that the lives of no less than up to 80% - and not just 20% - of the patients can be saved, when Remdesivir is used at the right time during the treatment. The main study source is https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764?query=featured_home

(...)

- ECMO machines are now said to be able to cure people who have been confined to ventilation machines; the problem is however that ECMOs are very costly.

- The Norwegian professor Terje Andersen is quite certain, that old blood from SARS-patients is able to stop Corona from developing further
https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/wPGJp5/ny-medisin-kan-sette-koronaviruset-sjakkmatt-jan-terje-andersen
(...)

Quote from: MusicTurner on June 21, 2020, 02:29:19 AM

Dextamethason is now being used in Danish hospitals, it is available, cheaper and apparently more effective than Remdesivir.

Quote from: MusicTurner on June 30, 2020, 09:39:55 PM
Hydrocortisone is also promising, cf. results from the UK, reducing fatalities with at least 1/3 among the very ill, and it will now be introduced at hospitals here.

(etc.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 13, 2020, 10:43:59 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 04, 2020, 06:00:31 AM
(...)

  Regarding countries, only Norway seems to have experienced a decidedly positive economic development during the virus however. Contrary to some predictions, Swedish economy apparently hasn't benefited a lot from the chosen strategy; BNP shrunk by 8.6 % in the second quarter of 2020, compared to the same quarter last year.

BNP (=GNP) shrunk with 7.4 % here in Denmark, compared to the same quarter in 2019, official calculations say today. Biggest drop since WW II years.

EDIT: However, it turns out that the drop was in the first period & there's been growth again, which is expected to continue rather quickly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 15, 2020, 12:18:29 AM
Interesting numbers on excess deaths... though please note this data is from end of July/early August.

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net%2Fprod%2F303d0f50-cdc9-11ea-a19e-67ce58ff06d7-fullwidth.png?dpr=1&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)

We can see that from the point of view of deaths, the US has now surpassed France but is still below several other European countries. And we can clearly see how badly the UK has done.

Keep in mind that now there are some effective treatments available, the relation between the infection rate and mortality rate has changed. This will benefit the US in a comparison with Europe, where the spread of the infection was ahead  and peaked without any effective treatments available.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 15, 2020, 12:39:41 AM
And then there is this.... the development of the number of deaths amongst diagnosed patients.
Non diagnosed are not accounted for. Which probably results in an underestimation of numbers in countries in which people have limited access to sophisticated health care.

And then there are of course countries that tweak the numbers... Like Iran and Russia.

All the Americas are on the rise, Europe is holding up... for now.

(https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net%2Fprod%2F6f9fc7f0-de4a-11ea-a417-456d065ff353-fullwidth.png?dpr=1&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=1260)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 15, 2020, 03:21:05 AM
Latin America has 45 % of global deaths now. Coronavirus seems to be quite deadly in Catholic countries where several generations tend to live under the same roof as large families. Catholic way of life doesn't seem to go well with the social distancing requirement of Covid-19. Or is it just a coincidence? I even suspect some of the coronavirus deaths in Catholic countries are actually suicides classified as coronavirus deaths because suicide is a sin in Catholicism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 15, 2020, 09:36:36 AM
You can't be serious..... heat stroke, Poju?  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on August 15, 2020, 06:49:40 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 15, 2020, 03:21:05 AM
Latin America has 45 % of global deaths now. Coronavirus seems to be quite deadly in Catholic countries where several generations tend to live under the same roof as large families. Catholic way of life doesn't seem to go well with the social distancing requirement of Covid-19. Or is it just a coincidence? I even suspect some of the coronavirus deaths in Catholic countries are actually suicides classified as coronavirus deaths because suicide is a sin in Catholicism.

The population size of a nation is not controlled, thereby influential, on the indicator. For intensity and tendency, death per capita would be more relevant indicator.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 15, 2020, 11:01:17 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on August 15, 2020, 06:49:40 PM
The population size of a nation is not controlled, thereby influential, on the indicator. For intensity and tendency, death per capita would be more relevant indicator.

That's where my post with the three tables comes in. Though the size of a country still creates bias since a large country can "absorb" a large number of cases with a relatively lower average before the infection (which tends to start in more densely populated areas) spreads over time over its entire territory. Brazil and the US are examples.

The absolute numbers per region over time, gives you an idea over the geographical development of the spread of the infection. See my post with the graphic.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 16, 2020, 06:02:13 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 15, 2020, 03:21:05 AM
Coronavirus seems to be quite deadly in Catholic countries

Such as USA, UK, Sweden and Iran.

On the other hand, Protestant countries such as Ireland, Austria, the German Catholic Lander and the Swiss Catholic cantons coped much better with the pandemic, proving once again the superiority of enlightened Protestantism over backward Catholicism.






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on August 16, 2020, 06:58:59 AM
Quote from: Que on August 15, 2020, 11:01:17 PM
That's where my post with the three tables comes in. Though the size of a country still creates bias since a large country can "absorb" a large number of cases with a relatively lower average before the infection (which tends to start in more densely populated areas) spreads over time over its entire territory. Brazil and the US are examples.

The absolute numbers per region over time, gives you an idea over the geographical development of the spread of the infection. See my post with the graphic.

Q

Yes the absolute numbers can exhibit temporal change within, if not across, nations. However, per capita numerals do the same within, and across, nations. Per capita indicators can be used for comparing the velocity of increase/decrease across the nations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 16, 2020, 08:53:39 AM

     Population immunity is slowing down the pandemic in parts of the US (https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/11/1006366/immunity-slowing-down-coronavirus-parts-us/)

Natural infection also turns out to be extremely efficient at reducing virus transmission—even more effective than an equal number of people getting a vaccine. The reason is that the virus has been finding and infecting precisely those people who—whether because of behavior, circumstances, or biology—are most likely to be part of transmission chains.

Perhaps they are college students on spring break, or hospital nurses, or people who touch their face all the time. Whatever the reason, once these individuals become infected and are removed from the equation through death or immunity, the effect on the pandemic is outsized. By contrast, vaccinating a sheltered older person might protect that individual but does relatively less to stop transmission.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 17, 2020, 05:53:31 AM
New Zealand delays election after return of Covid-19 (https://www.france24.com/en/20200816-new-zealand-delays-election-after-return-of-covid-19)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 17, 2020, 07:29:20 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 10, 2020, 01:23:23 PM
Two more coronavirus deaths in Finland: Now the count is 333.

The last week saw one new corona death in Finland and the count is now 334.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2020, 07:39:56 AM
Italy shutters nightclubs, mandates masks as coronavirus case numbers rise again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 17, 2020, 11:00:55 AM

    Scientists See Signs of Lasting Immunity to Covid-19, Even After Mild Infections (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/16/health/coronavirus-immunity-antibodies.html)

Although researchers cannot forecast how long these immune responses will last, many experts consider the data a welcome indication that the body's most studious cells are doing their job — and will have a good chance of fending off the coronavirus, faster and more fervently than before, if exposed to it again.

"This is exactly what you would hope for," said Marion Pepper, an immunologist at the University of Washington and an author on another of the new studies, which is currently under review at the journal Nature. "All the pieces are there to have a totally protective immune response."


     I read somewhere that even common cold virus exposure might be enough to confer immunity for some people, which would explain why so many people are asymptomatic and many more get mild cases.

     I found a somewhere, a different one:

     Can the common cold give you immunity to Covid-19? (https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/08/03/common-cold)

"One of the characteristics of T-helper cells is that they are not only activated by a pathogen with an 'exact fit,' but also by pathogens with 'sufficient similarity,'" explained Claudia Giesecke-Thiel, head of the Flow Cytometry Facility at the Planck Institute and a lead author of the study.

As such, the researchers hypothesized in the study that the healthy participants "probably acquired [the T cells]" that reacted to SARS-CoV-2 after fighting an infection from a similar coronavirus, such as those that can cause the common cold. The researchers said those T cells' "memory" of the similar infection likely resulted in what's known as "cross-reactivity" to SARS-CoV-2, CNN reports.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2020, 11:02:14 AM
Quote from: drogulus on August 17, 2020, 11:00:55 AM
    Scientists See Signs of Lasting Immunity to Covid-19, Even After Mild Infections (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/16/health/coronavirus-immunity-antibodies.html)

Although researchers cannot forecast how long these immune responses will last, many experts consider the data a welcome indication that the body's most studious cells are doing their job — and will have a good chance of fending off the coronavirus, faster and more fervently than before, if exposed to it again.

"This is exactly what you would hope for," said Marion Pepper, an immunologist at the University of Washington and an author on another of the new studies, which is currently under review at the journal Nature. "All the pieces are there to have a totally protective immune response."


     I read somewhere that even common cold virus exposure might be enough to confer immunity for some people, which would explain why so many people are asymptomatic and many more get mild cases.

     I found a somewhere, a different one:

     Can the common cold give you immunity to Covid-19? (https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/08/03/common-cold)

"One of the characteristics of T-helper cells is that they are not only activated by a pathogen with an 'exact fit,' but also by pathogens with 'sufficient similarity,'" explained Claudia Giesecke-Thiel, head of the Flow Cytometry Facility at the Planck Institute and a lead author of the study.

As such, the researchers hypothesized in the study that the healthy participants "probably acquired [the T cells]" that reacted to SARS-CoV-2 after fighting an infection from a similar coronavirus, such as those that can cause the common cold. The researchers said those T cells' "memory" of the similar infection likely resulted in what's known as "cross-reactivity" to SARS-CoV-2, CNN reports.


Tentative good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 17, 2020, 03:18:58 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 17, 2020, 11:02:14 AM
Tentative good news.

Good news are so much in need!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2020, 03:33:13 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 17, 2020, 03:18:58 PM
Good news are so much in need!

True.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 20, 2020, 04:15:04 PM
France confirms 4,711 new cases, exceeding Wednesday's post-lockdown record
France confirmed 4,711 new coronavirus cases and 12 deaths in the past 24 hours, the country's health ministry announced Thursday, marking it the largest single-day jump in infections since before the country's lockdown was lifted in May.

The case count far surpassed Wednesday's 3,776 new cases.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 20, 2020, 04:23:34 PM
CDC director says South turning the tide as college parties fuel coronavirus concerns
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 24, 2020, 05:43:38 AM
Covid-19 Live Updates: Researchers Document First Case of Virus Reinfection

A patient was diagnosed with a second case of Covid-19 more than four months after the first, scientists in Hong Kong said. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/24/world/covid-19-coronavirus.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on August 24, 2020, 10:44:10 AM
It's mostly the increased testing in Europe. The number of hospitalizations and deaths is at around 0.2% of the supposedly new infections, very different than in Spring. Either: these postive tests have lots of false positives (some claim that it is more noise than signal, amplified by far more tests than in spring). Or: the virus is not around 1-4% deadly but around 0.1%. Both should be good news but it is almost universally presented as horrible news. People are so terrified that they cannot apply middle school maths. All I say applies only to Germany and most of continental Europe. If you look at Italy, France, Germany, the "cases" (i.e. test positives) rise but the deaths stay very low at below or around 10/day. It should be 50-100 to keep up with the rising cases. But they don't, this is very clear.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 24, 2020, 01:03:19 PM
Quote from: Jo498 on August 24, 2020, 10:44:10 AM
It's mostly the increased testing in Europe. The number of hospitalizations and deaths is at around 0.2% of the supposedly new infections, very different than in Spring. Either: these positive tests have lots of false positives (some claim that it is more noise than signal, amplified by far more tests than in spring). Or: the virus is not around 1-4% deadly but around 0.1%. Both should be good news but it is almost universally presented as horrible news. People are so terrified that they cannot apply middle school maths. All I say applies only to Germany and most of continental Europe. If you look at Italy, France, Germany, the "cases" (i.e. test positives) rise but the deaths stay very low at below or around 10/day. It should be 50-100 to keep up with the rising cases. But they don't, this is very clear.

An explanation I read is that this time around it is mainly the young and healthy, ignoring safety concerns, that get infected.
We have already seen that they are far less likely to get ill, recover more quickly, and very rarely die. Plus for the more serious cases there are some treatments available.

The cases that reach the hospitals seem to confirm this: young people that recover relatively quickly and leave again and thereby keeping the number of hospitalised low.

It's the elderly and vulnerable that stay cautious and avoid infection. And rightly so: IMO they run the same risks as before even though survival rates will be somewhat better.

The problem with this situation that although the young are generally not much affected, they keep spreading the virus.

And as links earlier posted  indicate: the virus seems to mutate enough to circumvent previously established immunity (like the flu). That would be very bad news indeed....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on August 24, 2020, 04:44:19 PM
Quote from: Que on August 24, 2020, 01:03:19 PM
Plus for the more serious cases there are some treatments available.

The cases that reach the hospitals seem to confirm this: young people that recover relatively quickly and leave again and thereby keeping the number of hospitalised low.

And as links earlier posted  indicate: the virus seems to mutate enough to circumvent previously established immunity (like the flu). That would be very bad news indeed....

Q

The high mortality rate in New York and New Jersey in the spring, which to this day accounts for a high percentage of the deaths in the U.S, was due in part to the system being overwhelmed and patients simply not receiving necessary care because staffing and PPE was insufficient for the case load. This fact should probably be kept in mind before attributing the lower current mortality rates to the youth and health of patients alone. Part of the difference is likely just logistical. Another part is due to two efficacious drugs and refined treatment practices.

I haven't yet heard evidence that the virus mutates quickly or quickly enough to circumvent immunity. That would indeed be bad news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 25, 2020, 08:07:17 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/fda-grossly-misrepresented-blood-plasma-121209062.html

What a f**g disgrace. The USA has become a laughing stock.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 25, 2020, 08:55:03 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 17, 2020, 07:29:20 AM
The last week saw one new corona death in Finland and the count is now 334.

One new corona death in Finland: 335.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 25, 2020, 08:58:24 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 25, 2020, 08:07:17 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/fda-grossly-misrepresented-blood-plasma-121209062.html

What a f**g disgrace. The USA has become a laughing stock.

A laughing stock yes, but these things have dead serious consequencies.  :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on August 25, 2020, 09:12:23 AM
My daughter sent me this:
(//)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 25, 2020, 09:38:27 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 25, 2020, 08:07:17 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/fda-grossly-misrepresented-blood-plasma-121209062.html

What a f**g disgrace. The USA has become a laughing stock.
Wow!  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 25, 2020, 09:39:37 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on August 25, 2020, 09:12:23 AM
My daughter sent me this:
(//)
Thanks for making me laugh Jeffrey (and daughter); I needed that!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on August 25, 2020, 09:58:47 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 25, 2020, 09:39:37 AM
Thanks for making me laugh Jeffrey (and daughter); I needed that!

PD

Always a pleasure PD. It made me laugh too.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 26, 2020, 06:25:27 AM
(https://covidtracking.com/static/a7cc01f3a1878e67ad133370d56352c3/f3583/john-hopkins-chart.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 26, 2020, 09:03:57 AM
Another day, another shameful development.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/26/coronavirus-cuomo-says-new-york-wont-follow-cdc-guidance-rips-into-agency-as-trumps-political-tool.html

As I said yesterday,

What a f**g disgrace. The USA has become is a laughing stock.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 26, 2020, 09:55:57 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 26, 2020, 09:03:57 AM
Another day, another shameful development.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/26/coronavirus-cuomo-says-new-york-wont-follow-cdc-guidance-rips-into-agency-as-trumps-political-tool.html

As I said yesterday,

What a f**g disgrace. The USA has become is a laughing stock.

In the UK they won't test asymptomatic people either, they say that the incidence of false negatives is too high and people who have been in close contact with someone with COVID should assume they've got it and isolate.

That being said, they are planning a massive programme of community testing starting in 2021, and that will include asymptomatic people - I think there are new tests which are easier to process coming on line which will make this feasible. I forget the numbers, maybe the plan is something like 500K tests a week, maybe more.

But BJ has some things in common with the potus, and ambitious plans often come to nothing more than a few headlines when they're announced, and then they're promptly forgotten about.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 26, 2020, 12:35:29 PM
Quote from: Que on August 26, 2020, 06:25:27 AM
(https://covidtracking.com/static/a7cc01f3a1878e67ad133370d56352c3/f3583/john-hopkins-chart.png)

In Finland about 10,000 tests are done daily (about the same amount per capita as the US) and the amount to positive test results is 20-40 per day meaning 0.2-0.4 % of the tests done. In comparison the amount of positive tests in the US is huge, 20-fold or so...  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 28, 2020, 11:32:10 AM
From Bloomberg News, emphasis added:

FDA Ousts Spokeswoman (1:46 p.m. NY)
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has parted ways with its chief spokeswoman, according to a person with knowledge of the move, after the head of the agency exaggerated the benefits of an experimental therapy, and others in the Trump administration promoted the erroneous statements.

The spokeswoman, Emily Miller, joined the agency earlier this month. She came to the job with communications experience in past government positions, a stint at conservative media outlets, and work advocating for gun rights. But she had little to no health-care experience. The news was first reported by the New York Times.

Miller's ousting comes after a press conference Sunday at which FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn said that convalescent blood plasma -- an experimental treatment that uses plasma from recovered Covid-19 patients to treat those currently infected -- could save 35 out of 100 people who would otherwise have died.

That was incorrect. The FDA only had data showing that a higher concentration of the treatment was better than a lower one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 29, 2020, 08:10:01 AM

     Group Whose NIH Grant For Virus Research Was Revoked Just Got A New Grant (https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/08/29/907237520/group-whose-nih-grant-for-virus-research-was-revoked-just-got-a-new-grant?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news)

     Don't expect an announcement that the conspiracy theory against the Wuhan lab is defunct. That's not how it works. It's more like no one wants to prop it up any more.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on August 31, 2020, 12:35:22 PM
My Trumpster brother is scaring me.

My ninety year old mother lives with them.  He listens to Fox new 24/7 and thinks people are being paranoid over the virus.

Thank God for my sister-in-law.  She is a nurse and takes this virus seriously.  She forces my brother to wear a mask to work and clean-up when he gets home.

I was talking with my mother today and she told me he is constantly trying to pressure then into going out and eating in a restaurant.  They used to eat out a lot.  They are refusing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 31, 2020, 01:39:19 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on August 31, 2020, 12:35:22 PM
My Trumpster brother is scaring me.

My ninety year old mother lives with them.  He listens to Fox new 24/7 and thinks people are being paranoid over the virus.

Thank God for my sister-in-law.  She is a nurse and takes this virus seriously.  She forces my brother to wear a mask to work and clean-up when he gets home.

I was talking with my mother today and she told me he is constantly trying to pressure then into going out and eating in a restaurant.  They bused to eat out a lot.  They are refusing.

That's bad, really. There are reports that excess deaths in the US in 2020 has passed 219000, which would mean the number of reported Covid deaths (180000) is seriously underestimated. Careless people are a danger to everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 31, 2020, 04:04:09 PM
Quote from: André on August 31, 2020, 01:39:19 PM
That's bad, really. There are reports that excess deaths in the US in 2020 has passed 219000, which would mean the number of reported Covid deaths (180000) is seriously underestimated. Careless people are a danger to everyone.

I've seen tabulations of excess deaths by state, with accompanying (% attributed to COVID) compared with European countries. As you might expect, the Sun Belt and Midwestern states have been seriously underestimating.
For instance, https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/07/15/tracking-covid-19-excess-deaths-across-countries , though I've seen summaries with better graphics.

And in the "I'm shocked, just shocked!" category:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/31/white-house-suppressed-coronavirus-reports-and-downplayed-virus-house-panel-says.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 31, 2020, 05:14:28 PM
The Trump Virus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 01, 2020, 06:51:15 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-coronavirus-scott-atlas-herd-immunity/2020/08/30/925e68fe-e93b-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html

One of President Trump's top medical advisers is urging the White House to embrace a controversial "herd immunity" strategy to combat the pandemic, which would entail allowing the coronavirus to spread through most of the population to quickly build resistance to the virus, while taking steps to protect those in nursing homes and other vulnerable populations, according to five people familiar with the discussions.

The administration has already begun to implement some policies along these lines, according to current and former officials as well as experts, particularly with regard to testing.

The approach's chief proponent is Scott Atlas, a neuroradiologist and fellow at Stanford's conservative Hoover Institution, who joined the White House in August as a pandemic adviser. He has advocated that the United States adopt the model Sweden has used to respond to the virus outbreak, according to these officials, which relies on lifting restrictions so healthy people can build immunity to the disease rather than limiting social and business interactions to prevent the virus from spreading.
...
Atlas, who does not have a background in infectious diseases or epidemiology, has expanded his influence inside the White House by advocating policies that appeal to Trump's desire to move past the pandemic and get the economy going, distressing health officials on the White House coronavirus task force and throughout the administration who worry that their advice is being followed less and less.
...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 01, 2020, 07:01:47 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 01, 2020, 06:51:15 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-coronavirus-scott-atlas-herd-immunity/2020/08/30/925e68fe-e93b-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-coronavirus-scott-atlas-herd-immunity/2020/08/30/925e68fe-e93b-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html)

One of President Trump's top medical advisers is urging the White House to embrace a controversial "herd immunity" strategy to combat the pandemic, which would entail allowing the coronavirus to spread through most of the population to quickly build resistance to the virus, while taking steps to protect those in nursing homes and other vulnerable populations, according to five people familiar with the discussions.

The administration has already begun to implement some policies along these lines, according to current and former officials as well as experts, particularly with regard to testing.

The approach's chief proponent is Scott Atlas, a neuroradiologist and fellow at Stanford's conservative Hoover Institution, who joined the White House in August as a pandemic adviser. He has advocated that the United States adopt the model Sweden has used to respond to the virus outbreak, according to these officials, which relies on lifting restrictions so healthy people can build immunity to the disease rather than limiting social and business interactions to prevent the virus from spreading.
...
Atlas, who does not have a background in infectious diseases or epidemiology, has expanded his influence inside the White House by advocating policies that appeal to Trump's desire to move past the pandemic and get the economy going, distressing health officials on the White House coronavirus task force and throughout the administration who worry that their advice is being followed less and less.
...

You see?! My doing nothing was a "strategy" all along!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 01, 2020, 08:10:08 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 25, 2020, 08:55:03 AM
One new corona death in Finland: 335.

Now 336. One per week it seems.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 05, 2020, 05:33:35 AM

Quote from: 71 dB on September 01, 2020, 08:10:08 AM
Now 336. One per week it seems.  :-\

336? That's an odd lot weekly total in many states in the Land of Science Denial!

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/04/key-coronavirus-forecast-predicts-over-410000-total-us-deaths-by-jan-1.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on September 05, 2020, 11:16:23 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 01, 2020, 08:10:08 AM
Now 336. One per week it seems.  :-\

352 new confirmed cases in Bucharest alone in the last 24 hours.  Total cases about 100,000. Deaths around 4,000. >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 05, 2020, 11:31:58 AM
- After loosening up over summer, numbers going up here in Denmark. 189 registered, newly infected today, which is the highest number since April, but it's mainly among youngsters, and severe cases are still very few. However, more restrictions from Monday will be the likely outcome;

- hydrocortisone is a cheap and very effective medicine, reducing the number of fatalities by 50% among severe cases, studies here say;

- Sweden is doing much better these days, but the initial costs have been very serious, compared to the other Nordic countries;

- on a Global level, at least 321 vaccine projects are being worked on, and at least 32 of those have begun clinical trials
(( https://www.nature.com/articles/d41573-020-00151-8?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=6bcfacc11e-briefing-dy-20200904&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-6bcfacc11e-45297858 ))

- estimates of when vaccines will be generally available, and when they'll be thoroughly effective, still vary a lot though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on September 05, 2020, 12:24:21 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 05, 2020, 11:31:58 AM
- After loosening up over summer, numbers going up here in Denmark. 189 registered, newly infected today, which is the highest number since April,

Sept.1. we had 201 cases, and probably there will be more to day than the preliminary result 189, because some of the answers to tests taken to day aren't registered until to morrow or the day after to morrow, but all tests are registered according to the day they were taken. So the situation is a bit worse, than we are told.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 07, 2020, 06:55:35 AM
Competent leadership matters

Coronavirus update: New York's infection rate has been below one percent for 30 days (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09/07/coronavirus-covid-updates/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_virus-ledeall-1030am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 07, 2020, 09:14:54 AM
Coronavirus spikes in Spain, France and U.K. raise specter of second wave (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/coronavirus-spikes-spain-france-u-k-raise-specter-second-wave-n1239454)

India surpasses Brazil, second behind U.S., in total coronavirus cases (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/india-surpasses-brazil-second-behind-u-s-total-coronavirus-cases-n1239456)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2020, 12:57:44 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EhVpS-zX0AE_PdQ?format=jpg&name=medium)

Creative campaigning from Rochdale council

https://mobile.twitter.com/RochdaleCouncil/status/1303063443822579713
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 09, 2020, 05:04:19 AM
AstraZeneca's Setback Delivers Reality Check on Vaccine Risks (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-09/astrazeneca-s-setback-delivers-reality-check-on-vaccine-risks)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 09, 2020, 07:33:22 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 05, 2020, 05:33:35 AM
336? That's an odd lot weekly total in many states in the Land of Science Denial!

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/04/key-coronavirus-forecast-predicts-over-410000-total-us-deaths-by-jan-1.html

Now 337. That's total corona deaths in Finland (5.5 million people). The first death happened March 20. Scaled to the population of the US that would be about 20,000.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 09, 2020, 07:44:24 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 09, 2020, 07:33:22 AM
Now 337. That's total corona deaths in Finland (5.5 million people). The first death happened March 20. Scaled to the population of the US that would be about 20,000.

You are one for needlessly repeating yourself, aren't you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 09, 2020, 07:56:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 09, 2020, 07:44:24 AM
You are one for needlessly repeating yourself, aren't you?

Can you blame me when Covid-19 is a nightmare that just doesn't end...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 09, 2020, 08:54:31 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 09, 2020, 07:33:22 AM
Now 337. That's total corona deaths in Finland (5.5 million people). The first death happened March 20. Scaled to the population of the US that would be about 20,000.

Hardly a fair comparison, is it?  ;D A civilized country vs. the Mecca of dumbassery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 09, 2020, 10:36:11 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 09, 2020, 08:54:31 AM
Hardly a fair comparison, is it?  ;D A civilized country vs. the Mecca of dumbassery.

Hardly. Who says it's a fair comparison?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 09, 2020, 11:21:04 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 09, 2020, 08:54:31 AM
The Mecca of dumbassery.

In a way, poetic...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 09, 2020, 04:13:12 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 09, 2020, 11:21:04 AM
In a way, poetic...
And intentional, poetic or not... ;) The dumbasses don't like them damn Muslims!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on September 09, 2020, 10:48:05 PM
I was talking to my mother today and she told me that my brother, whom she lives with, still thinks people who wear masks, etc. are paranoid.  My sister-in-law, who is a nurse, still differs with him.  He thinks it is perfectly safe to go out and eat in a restaurant and she refuses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 12, 2020, 09:53:08 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-12/trump-aides-sought-to-meddle-with-cdc-s-virus-reports-politico
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 01:27:18 AM
There's a clear tendency of the corona hitting younger people harder here in DK, 1/3 of hospitalizations are now people younger than 45. Also, long-time effects, including neuro- and brain damages, form a matter of increased concern.

We've had increased numbers of infections, in July we were down to 20-30 a day, but daily numbers are now 250-350, newly introduced measures and restrictions will hopefully have effect say within a week. The total number of hospitalizations is around 55, intensive care less than 5, but from a population of 5.6 mio though, and around 635 fatalities.

I'm camping and biking on the pretty island of Møn, around 150 km from the capital, my main job was suddenly put on a pause for another two weeks due to the situation, but salary is guaranteed. Still quite warm for the season. A lovely museum farmhouse area has tenting for less than 3 Euros/night, and there's a good sandy beach very close by, plus plenty to explore. A lot of senior Copenhageners have spent most of 2020 in retreat down here, if they own summer houses on the island. And now it's another period of retreat due to the exceptional circumstances for me ...

EDIT: Ouch, today's number is above 400 newly infected, meaning 822 in just two days. Some youngster - and immigrant groups are among the most affected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 17, 2020, 07:51:08 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 01:27:18 AM
EDIT: Ouch, today's number is above 400 newly infected, meaning 822 in just two days. Some youngster - and immigrant groups are among the most affected.

Very sad to hear this. One of my best students last Spring was an exchange student from Denmark. When the lockdowns started and things went crazy here in late March, she was deported and finished the course online from home. I hope she is okay.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 07:56:40 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 17, 2020, 07:51:08 AM
Very sad to hear this. One of my best students last Spring was an exchange student from Denmark. When the lockdowns started and things went crazy here in late March, she was deported and finished the course online from home. I hope she is okay.

Generally, the atmosphere here is still quite ~positive or ~optimistic, considering the circumstances. But we need to catch up, especially the groups with risky behaviour, for the situation not to get out of hand. Our state authorities have done a lot, but a more or less complete, second lock-down seems too difficult to carry through, and unlikely.

It's a general trend in Europe these days, and there are only around 10 countries, including some minute ones, that our state authorities don't warn against travelling to, unless it is absolutely necessary.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Scion7 on September 17, 2020, 08:18:13 AM
88,000 U.S. college students currently with COVID-19 disease.  Who knows how many more are positive for the virus, but are not ill.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 17, 2020, 12:02:54 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 01:27:18 AM
There's a clear tendency of the corona hitting younger people harder here in DK, 1/3 of hospitalizations are now people younger than 45. Also, long-time effects, including neuro- and brain damages, form a matter of increased concern.

We've had increased numbers of infections, in July we were down to 20-30 a day, but daily numbers are now 250-350, newly introduced measures and restrictions will hopefully have effect say within a week. The total number of hospitalizations is around 55, intensive care less than 5, but from a population of 5.6 mio though, and around 635 fatalities.

I'm camping and biking on the pretty island of Møn, around 150 km from the capital, my main job was suddenly put on a pause for another two weeks due to the situation, but salary is guaranteed. Still quite warm for the season. A lovely museum farmhouse area has tenting for less than 3 Euros/night, and there's a good sandy beach very close by, plus plenty to explore. A lot of senior Copenhageners have spent most of 2020 in retreat down here, if they own summer houses on the island. And now it's another period of retreat due to the exceptional circumstances for me ...

EDIT: Ouch, today's number is above 400 newly infected, meaning 822 in just two days. Some youngster - and immigrant groups are among the most affected.
Sorry to hear about the rise in the infection rates.  Are people starting to rebel about wearing masks?  I saw something horrible on the news recently:  a group of people going into a Walmart encouraging people to take their masks off.  Their anthem:  "We're not going to take it" [which was condemned by the songwriter].  Glad, for your sake, however that you're enjoying getting some healthy exercise and visiting new areas in your lovely country.

Quote from: krummholz on September 17, 2020, 07:51:08 AM
Very sad to hear this. One of my best students last Spring was an exchange student from Denmark. When the lockdowns started and things went crazy here in late March, she was deported and finished the course online from home. I hope she is okay.
I feel for the students being deported...hard on them too!  May I ask what you teach Krummholz?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 17, 2020, 12:09:55 PM
Australian air carrier's seven-hour scenic 'flight to nowhere' sells out in 10 minutes
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 17, 2020, 12:37:33 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 17, 2020, 12:09:55 PM
Australian air carrier's seven-hour scenic 'flight to nowhere' sells out in 10 minutes
Wow!  Clever idea by the airlines.  Questions:  how will the airlines ensure social distancing between passengers (and crew too) and keep people safe?  Will they be doing temperature testing (at least) of the passengers?  Apparently, there are also Asian airlines doing the same.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/09/17/growing-number-airlines-offer-flights-nowhere-international-travel-remains-stalled/

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 17, 2020, 02:43:15 PM
One of the best and most informative discussions I've heard recently was between Laurie Garrett, Pulitzer Prize winner for her writing on Pandemics and Andy Slavitt, Obama's head of Medicare and Medicaid on the latest episode of Al Franken's podcast, starting with Trump's push for a pre-election vaccine release and the problems of trust in any vaccine in a polarized society, and moving on to much more.

Al can often try too hard to keep things jokey or inject himself into the story, but on this one he largely stands back. I played the whole hour right through a second time after I first heard it.

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-al-franken-podcast/e/77677913?autoplay=true

Conversation starts at 6:25


They refer to Laurie Garret's article in Foreign Policy near the start, which is this:

Trump's Vaccine Can't Be Trusted
If a vaccine comes out before the election, there are very good reasons not to take it. (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/03/trumps-vaccine-cant-be-trusted/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 17, 2020, 12:02:54 PM
Sorry to hear about the rise in the infection rates.  Are people starting to rebel about wearing masks?  I saw something horrible on the news recently:  a group of people going into a Walmart encouraging people to take their masks off.  Their anthem:  "We're not going to take it" [which was condemned by the songwriter].  Glad, for your sake, however that you're enjoying getting some healthy exercise and visiting new areas in your lovely country.
I feel for the students being deported...hard on them too!  May I ask what you teach Krummholz?

PD

We have a few people protesting, and on FB groups etc, but though there is some corona fatigue, the tendency is to introduce more masks, also by law, recently at foodserving places where you stand up ... the Wal-Mart incident (isolated?) would be rather impossible - at least, that's what I'd like to think ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on September 18, 2020, 11:47:34 AM
In Romania schools opened September 14, against the advice of experts who suggested October 1st.

My son is 7yo and their class share the room with a class of 9th-graders. Yesterday evening the teacher of my son's class let us know that one of the 9th-graders was confirmed with Covid-19. They assured us that disinfection took place after every shift, but doubt still remains, right?

Imho, long before Christmas most European countries will be back on (total) lockdown. I'd very much like to be proven wrong, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 18, 2020, 12:46:56 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 17, 2020, 11:08:04 PM
We have a few people protesting, and on FB groups etc, but though there is some corona fatigue, the tendency is to introduce more masks, also by law, recently at foodserving places where you stand up ... the Wal-Mart incident (isolated?) would be rather impossible - at least, that's what I'd like to think ...
Where you stand up?  Not quite following you there MT.  Here, for example, we have a number of restaurants where you can pick up take-out; you're supposed to follow certain rules like keeping socially distant in line, placing your order first over the phone (for many places), arranging for a pickup time, sometimes calling to let them know that you're there (it varies).

There are also some restaurants that have set up outdoor dining with the usual spacing.  The servers wear masks.  Some of these setups make me a bit nervous if I'm walking past them because the restaurants are on one side, then sidewalk, then tables (protected by road traffic by cement barricades)...so, basically, I as a pedestrian, am walking very close to people with no masks at tables, but also sometimes standing on the sidewalks without masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 18, 2020, 01:41:20 PM
Quote from: Florestan on September 18, 2020, 11:47:34 AM


Imho, long before Christmas most European countries will be back on (total) lockdown. I'd very much like to be proven wrong, though.

OK. In the UK we're seeing the same thing. And we're also seeing that the two key elements of our strategy - local light lock-downs and test and trace -  are ineffective or unfeasible or unenforceable by normal policing.  The question is this then: What to do to avoid a third lock-down? 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 18, 2020, 01:47:12 PM
And from Mister Disinformation: Trump, with no evidence, says vaccines will be available for all by April
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 18, 2020, 02:39:20 PM
Van Morrison Has A Trio of Anti-Lockdown Protest Anthems (https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/9451653/van-morrison-anti-lockdown-protest-songs)

"Rock icon Van Morrison will release three songs that address the COVID-19 lockdown in the U.K., "Born To Be Free," "As I Walked Out" and "No More Lockdown." "I'm not telling people what to do or think, the government is doing a great job of that already," the 75-year-old singer said in a statement announcing the protest anthems that will be available for download and streaming only, respectively, on Sept. 25, Oct. 9 and Oct. 23. "It's about freedom of choice, I believe people should have the right to think for themselves."

Morrison has been campaigning for a re-opening of performance venues at full capacity, with the statement noting that he "feels strongly" that the ongoing lockdown presents an existential threat to the future of live music venues. The U.K. has allowed some socially distanced gigs since Aug. 1, but, as in the United States, there have been few other shows since the pandemic caused a worldwide lockdown in March.

"No more lockdown/ No more government overreach/ No more fascist bullies/ Disturbing our peace/ No more taking of our freedom/ And our God given rights/ Pretending it's for our safety/ When it's really to enslave," he sings in the lyrics to "No More Lockdown." The message on "As I Walked Out" has a similar cast, with the opening lines, "As I walked out/All the streets were empty/ The government said Everyone should stay home/ And they spread fear and loathing/  And no hope for the future/ Not many did question/ This very strange move."

Both songs attack government figures, celebrities and, on "Lockdown," the "Imperial College scientists making up crooked facts," with the chorus of "Born To Be Free" stating, "The new normal, is not normal/ It's no kind of normal at all/ Everyone seems to have amnesia/  Just trying to remember the Berlin Wall."

The lyrics to "As I Walked Out" also note that "the government website from the 21st March 2020/ It said COVID-19 was no longer high risk," though The Guardian noted that the virus is still considered highly infectious, with officials confirming a 75% increase in positive weekly cases across England last week.

Morrison has played three socially distanced gigs this month and plans to debut the new songs at a series of shows at the London Palladium later in September after he previews them on the #SaveLiveMusic social media platforms. Morrison isn't the only British rock star chafing against the coronavirus lockdown. Former Oasis guitarist/songwriter Noel Gallagher told podcast host Matt Morgan last week that he would not wear a mask while out shopping or riding public transit, saying, "There's too many f--king liberties being taken away from us now."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on September 18, 2020, 06:51:04 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 18, 2020, 02:39:20 PM
Van Morrison Has A Trio of Anti-Lockdown Protest Anthems (https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/9451653/van-morrison-anti-lockdown-protest-songs)

I'd burn my Morrison records, but the air quality here is already bad enough.

Quote
#SaveLiveMusic

I hope #SaveLivePeople is trending.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 18, 2020, 10:03:40 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 18, 2020, 12:46:56 PM
Where you stand up?  Not quite following you there MT.  Here, for example, we have a number of restaurants where you can pick up take-out; you're supposed to follow certain rules like keeping socially distant in line, placing your order first over the phone (for many places), arranging for a pickup time, sometimes calling to let them know that you're there (it varies).

There are also some restaurants that have set up outdoor dining with the usual spacing.  The servers wear masks.  Some of these setups make me a bit nervous if I'm walking past them because the restaurants are on one side, then sidewalk, then tables (protected by road traffic by cement barricades)...so, basically, I as a pedestrian, am walking very close to people with no masks at tables, but also sometimes standing on the sidewalks without masks.

Agree, the exact rules here are still a bit of a mystery, they were introduced a couple of days ago & having been in the provinces, I'm not sure whether as a guest you need to wear masks say when moving inside a city cafe or restaurant or not, apparently masks aren't obligatory 'when just sitting down' ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:34:07 AM
Quote from: Daverz on September 18, 2020, 06:51:04 PM
I'd burn my Morrison records, but the air quality here is already bad enough.

Thank God I never got into his music and this tells me to never even try! From now on he is not known as Van Morrison, but "One Morron."  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:44:04 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 18, 2020, 01:47:12 PM
And from Mister Disinformation: Trump, with no evidence, says vaccines will be available for all by April

I certainly hope vaccines are available by April 2021! Should have been available last April! The real problem is will enough Americans take the vaccine so that the herd immunity gets on proper level? A lot of Americans are not cool with taking Bill Gate's microchips into their bodies even if you are Karl.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on September 19, 2020, 02:23:24 PM

     
Quote from: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:44:04 AM
A lot of Americans are not cool with taking Bill Gate's microchips into their bodies even if you are Karl.  0:)

     What I do is go for the mid priced one and upgrade more often.

     The numbers in Massachusetts are not looking so good, especially new cases. I think the long awaited second wave may have arrived.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 19, 2020, 02:51:08 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:34:07 AM
Thank God I never got into his music and this tells me to never even try! From now on he is not known as Van Morrison, but "One Morron."  :-\

That wasn't why I posted it. And you should get into his music because some of it is brilliant. And he's said some questionable non-music stuff in the past, just doesn't usually put it on disc like that.

If you demand some level of moral purity or correctness from your artists then you wont have much to listen to.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on September 19, 2020, 04:22:45 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:34:07 AM
Thank God I never got into his music and this tells me to never even try! From now on he is not known as Van Morrison, but "One Morron."  :-\

Well some of it is gorgeous stuff.  I still love Astral Weeks.  "Death of the Author" and all that. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 19, 2020, 06:24:08 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 19, 2020, 05:44:04 AM
I certainly hope vaccines are available by April 2021! Should have been available last April! The real problem is will enough Americans take the vaccine so that the herd immunity gets on proper level? A lot of Americans are not cool with taking Bill Gate's microchips into their bodies even if you are Karl.  0:)

You do say weird things, buddy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on September 20, 2020, 01:31:35 AM
I think people are overestimating the effect of a vaccine. First of all, such a fast release would be almost unprecedented and the danger of side effects for most people more serious than Covid (recall for almost every healthy person below 60 Covid is not very dangerous). It's anyone's guess if there can be a vaccine next year that is not more dangerous than Covid.
Secondly, the efficiency of a vaccine is dubious, especially with a comparably harmless disease.
I recently looked up the history of Smallpox vaccination. Smallpox is officially eradicated in the wild (there are samples in labs as potential counter for the use of smallpox as a bioweapon). Apparently the result of vaccination was to reduce the lethality of smallpox from 20-30% to 2-3%. This is a factor of 10 but apparently some people still got smallpox and even with vaccination 5-10 times as many people died (with 19th century medical support) than from Covid. If one looks into influenza vaccination the effect is rather small. (It seems that many studies here are poorly designed and have been critized, for a layman it is hard to see what actually is the case without doing more research than I can be bothered to do. In any case the efficiency is sufficiently dubious that most health officials only recommend it for groups at special risk,)  And it is probably going to be similar with Covid. So the main point would probably be to protect medical personnel with vaccination. But after the chaos at the beginning, by now medical personnel already seems to be decently protected by the measures taken.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on September 20, 2020, 01:44:45 AM
One of the problems with medical personel  is that they contract the disease at private events and bring it along to collegues and patients. This is why they ought to become vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 23, 2020, 01:23:50 PM
I found this story to be quite interesting and inspiring.  I hadn't heard of this singer before, professional name of Gordi, but had heard of Bon Iver.  Many thanks to her for going back to her other life as a doctor and helping with the fight against Covid--and risking her own health in doing so.  Also includes her comments regarding mask-wearing.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-54179877

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on September 24, 2020, 10:41:41 AM
Downloaded the new NHS contact tracing app which was released today, just hope it achieves something in the attempt to gain some control of Covid.

What I haven't figured out yet is if a neighbour who tests positive is sitting the other side of a party wall, while somebody's sitting this side (within the specified 4 metres bluetooth range), whether I'll get an alert telling me I or whoever has to self isolate, because our phones have been close enough for long enough. Or indeed the same for a parked car outside.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 24, 2020, 04:16:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/stanford-researchers-say-they-wont-be-silenced-after-criticizing-trumps-coronavirus-advisor-dr-scott-atlas.html

Straight from the Orange Pustule playbook: YOU'RE FIRED!!! I'M GONNA SUE!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 25, 2020, 05:28:16 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 24, 2020, 04:16:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/stanford-researchers-say-they-wont-be-silenced-after-criticizing-trumps-coronavirus-advisor-dr-scott-atlas.html

Straight from the Orange Pustule playbook: YOU'RE FIRED!!! I'M GONNA SUE!!!  ;D

YOUREFIRED was the password Trump used for one of his media accounts before it was cracked by hackers. Given his limited ability to focus, it's likely it was his password on all his other accounts. Quite the password for the big red button, too  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2020, 01:58:57 PM
"Sweden, where a shutdown-free pandemic response prompted a global debate, is seeing another wave of covid-19 cases, with the country's state epidemiologist warning this week that it was heading in the "wrong direction" as winter approaches.

Sweden's public health body recorded 554 new covid-19 cases Thursday — the highest since early July — and 417 on Friday, according to its online tracking tool, capping off what epidemiologist Anders Tegnell had warned would be a "record week" for new cases.

"It is slowly but surely going in the wrong direction in Sweden, even if the situation is not as serious as in other parts of Europe," Tegnell said at a news briefing Thursday, according to the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.

Unlike many other nations, Sweden has pursued a policy for containing the virus that avoided strict government measures such as school or restaurant closures. The success or failure of that policy is still being debated far beyond Sweden's borders, where most countries implemented some form of lockdown."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 26, 2020, 12:49:21 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 24, 2020, 04:16:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/stanford-researchers-say-they-wont-be-silenced-after-criticizing-trumps-coronavirus-advisor-dr-scott-atlas.html

Straight from the Orange Pustule playbook: YOU'RE FIRED!!! I'M GONNA SUE!!!  ;D

White House advisor on coronavirus Dr. Atlas is not a virologist.... but a.... radiologist!  ??? 

Only in America....  ;)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 26, 2020, 06:49:46 AM
Fewer than 1 in 10 Americans show signs of past coronavirus infection, large national study finds (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/09/25/coronavirus-immunity-us/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on September 26, 2020, 12:03:50 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 26, 2020, 06:49:46 AM
Fewer than 1 in 10 Americans show signs of past coronavirus infection, large national study finds (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/09/25/coronavirus-immunity-us/)

So?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 26, 2020, 12:14:53 PM
Quote from: Que on September 26, 2020, 12:49:21 AM
White House advisor on coronavirus Dr. Atlas is not a virologist.... but a.... radiologist!  ??? 

Only in America....  ;)

Q
Hey, at least he's a Doctor!
That makes him exceptionally (and almost uniquely) qualified for an Orange Pustule appointee.  :laugh: :laugh:
In fact, I'm shocked he's not a former Big Pharma lobbyist, which would be the norm for said appointees.
I'm almost certain that the selection process was "find the most respectable name who will publicly advocate the herd immunity approach".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 26, 2020, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: Florestan on September 26, 2020, 12:03:50 PM
So?


waiting for herd immunity is not much of a "strategy."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on September 26, 2020, 07:14:41 PM
Quote from: Que on September 26, 2020, 12:49:21 AM
White House advisor on coronavirus Dr. Atlas is not a virologist.... but a.... radiologist!  ??? 

Only in America....  ;)

Q

He may think x-rays will kill the buggers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 30, 2020, 10:22:43 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/30/appalachian-state-student-dies-from-coronavirus-complications-.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 01, 2020, 09:06:53 AM

     The best available strategy is 1) transmission suppression 2) vaccine plus suppression 3) gradual development of herd immunity.

     Climate change and environmental destruction mean humans and animals will continue to migrate, creating more opportunities for unknown viruses to spread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 01, 2020, 09:08:40 AM
Quote from: drogulus on October 01, 2020, 09:06:53 AM
     The best available strategy is 1) transmission suppression 2) vaccine plus suppression 3) gradual development of herd immunity.

     Climate change and environmental destruction mean humans and animals will continue to migrate, creating more opportunities for unknown viruses to spread.

3 is also known as thin the electoral herd.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 01, 2020, 04:37:01 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-01/cdc-money-for-covid-tracking-tests-has-been-stalled-for-months

A Trump administration ad campaign is the only notable spending from the $1 billion in virus funding

The bulk of a $1 billion funding package intended to help the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fight the Covid-19 pandemic in the U.S. has remained unspent since being authorized more than five months ago, according to people familiar with the matter.

The funding, part of the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, also known as the PPP, was set aside by Congress on April 24 for "surveillance, epidemiology, laboratory capacity expansion, contact tracing," improvements to data systems and boosting testing for Covid-19.
Trump administration officials directed $200 million of the money to a $300 million ad campaign about the virus, according to a CDC spokesman. The ad campaign is being developed outside the agency. CDC Director Robert Redfield said last month the agency needs billions more to help distribute a vaccine. Other funds allocated to the agency have been steered to the White House's "Operation Warp Speed" vaccine development program, which CDC is a part of.

But most of the allocation has sat idle despite requests over the summer from CDC to access some of the money, according to one person familiar with the matter. Two of the people familiar with the issue confirmed the CDC didn't have access to the money as recently as September. The people asked not to be identified discussing information that wasn't public.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 01, 2020, 05:08:34 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-02/trump-aide-hope-hicks-tests-positive-for-coronavirus-infection

Hope Hicks, one of President Donald Trump's closest aides, has tested positive for coronavirus infection, according to people familiar with the matter.

There was no indication that the president has contracted the virus, the people said. Hicks traveled with Trump aboard Air Force One to and from the presidential debate on Tuesday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vers la flamme on October 02, 2020, 03:06:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 01, 2020, 05:08:34 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-02/trump-aide-hope-hicks-tests-positive-for-coronavirus-infection

Hope Hicks, one of President Donald Trump's closest aides, has tested positive for coronavirus infection, according to people familiar with the matter.

There was no indication that the president has contracted the virus, the people said. Hicks traveled with Trump aboard Air Force One to and from the presidential debate on Tuesday.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-covid.html

Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 02, 2020, 03:40:18 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on October 02, 2020, 03:06:42 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-covid.html

Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus

This was a question of time really. Trump avoided infection quite a long imo.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 02, 2020, 04:10:50 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on October 02, 2020, 03:06:42 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/02/us/politics/trump-covid.html

Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus

Really? Hurray!

I have a $10 bet with a friend that Trump wouldn't finish a term in office and I may still have a chance if he dies!

Edit: It seems there were several people exposed to Hope Hicks who were in the debate room, none of whom wore masks. So, everyone in the hall is in danger of infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 02, 2020, 08:41:03 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/outbreak-secret-training-center-underlines-123852397.html

Outbreak at Secret Service Training Center Underlines Proximity of Virus to White House
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on October 02, 2020, 08:51:36 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on October 02, 2020, 04:10:50 AM
Really? Hurray!

I have a $10 bet with a friend that Trump wouldn't finish a term in office and I may still have a chance if he dies!

Edit: It seems there were several people exposed to Hope Hicks who were in the debate room, none of whom wore masks. So, everyone in the hall is in danger of infection.

The latest via Twitter speculation is that (given that Hicks had tested negative just a few hours earlier), it's likely Trump and Hicks were infected about the same time. Also the president of Notre Dame, who was at the ceremony where Trump announced the Barrett nomination (and did not wear a mask), has announced he has Covid19.  So he's more likely to be the one who spread it into the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 02, 2020, 06:51:20 PM
Quote from: JBS on October 02, 2020, 08:51:36 AM
The latest via Twitter speculation is that (given that Hicks had tested negative just a few hours earlier), it's likely Trump and Hicks were infected about the same time. Also the president of Notre Dame, who was at the ceremony where Trump announced the Barrett nomination (and did not wear a mask), has announced he has Covid19.  So he's more likely to be the one who spread it into the White House.

Plus (from Bloomberg News; Lee has been cited on the Politics thread iirc):

North Carolina's Tillis Says He Has Tested Positive

Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said Friday he had tested positive for Covid-19. Another member of the panel, Mike Lee of Utah, announced he was positive earlier Friday.


Both were among the Republican senators who attended the Rose Garden ceremony last Saturday in which Trump announced the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. The senators sat a row behind senior White House staff and Vice President Mike Pence.



I say that's a definite cluster, as does the WHO (oh, but they're dominated by China... :P). Let's hope it doesn't turn out to be a superspreader event.
[Added] Now add Kellyanne Conway.
[More] Donald Trump's campaign manager, Bill Stepien, tested positive for Covid-19 on Friday, becoming the latest associate of the president to become infected with the disease, spokesman Tim Murtaugh said late Friday.

Holy s**t, Batman! I think we have a superspreader event!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/scotus-nomination-coronavirus-superspreader-white-house-senator-mike-lee-b749466.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 03, 2020, 06:58:26 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/03/ron-johnson-is-third-gop-senator-to-test-positive-for-coronavirus-in-two-days.html

Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is the third Republican senator to test positive for Covid-19 after President Donald Trump announced early Friday that he and the first lady had a positive diagnosis.

Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who attended the Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination announcement at the White House last Saturday, have also tested positive for the virus. Both are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is the panel that will hold hearings on her nomination.

It is unclear where Johnson contracted the vi
rus, but he was exposed earlier this week to someone who has since tested positive for the virus, according to his office.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/03/chris-christie-tests-positive-for-coronavirus.html

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has tested positive for the coronavirus.

"I just received word that I am positive for COVID-19. I want to thank all of my friends and colleagues who have reached out to ask how I was feeling in the last day or two," Christie wrote in a tweet on Saturday. "I will be receiving medical attention today and will keep the necessary folks apprised of my condition."

Christie's diagnosis comes as several aides and Senators who attended President Trump's Supreme Court nomination announcement at the White House last Saturday have since announced positive Covid-19 test results.

President Donald Trump announced early Friday that he and the first lady had a positive diagnosis and the president was taken to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Friday.

Christie helped Trump prepare for last week's presidential debate with Democratic nominee Joe Biden and was at the White House ceremony last weekend and said that no one was wearing masks during debate prep.

"No one was wearing masks in the room when we were prepping the president during that period of time," Christie said in an interview on ABC. "And the group was about five or six people, in total."


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 03, 2020, 09:11:47 AM
Problems with the doctor's briefing regarding #45 today:

the doctor's wording implies that the president was diagnosed much earlier, '72 hours ago', meaning on Wednesday, and if that was the case, he exposed a lot of people to the virus, and without wearing a mask, during public meetings.
It's pretty easy to contradict this as a some kind of misunderstanding, but further evidence might turn up, supporting or dismantling such a timeline.

EDIT: the apparent clarification soon afterwards was that the doctor meant '3 days', not '72 hours' like he said.

Growing indications that the Rose Garden Ceremony at the White House last Saturday was a super-spreader event
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54401186
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/03/politics/donald-trump-coronavirus-walter-reed/index.html
WH journalists infected
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/three-white-house-journalists-test-positive-for-coronavirus-after-closely-covering-trump/2020/10/02/c907f1c4-04f5-11eb-b7ed-141dd88560ea_story.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on October 03, 2020, 09:49:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 03, 2020, 09:11:47 AM
...
EDIT: the apparent clarification soon afterwards was that the doctor meant '3 days', not '72 hours' like he said.
...
How many hours were there in those 3 days?  ??? ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 03, 2020, 10:37:57 AM
Quote from: ritter on October 03, 2020, 09:49:21 AM
How many hours were there in those 3 days?  ??? ::)

There could be as little as 26 and no more than 74.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 03, 2020, 11:57:33 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 03, 2020, 09:11:47 AM
Problems with the doctor's briefing regarding #45 today:

the doctor's wording implies that the president was diagnosed much earlier, '72 hours ago', meaning on Wednesday, and if that was the case, he exposed a lot of people to the virus, and without wearing a mask, during public meetings.
It's pretty easy to contradict this as a some kind of misunderstanding, but further evidence might turn up, supporting or dismantling such a timeline.

EDIT: the apparent clarification soon afterwards was that the doctor meant '3 days', not '72 hours' like he said.

(...)

Turns out however that the clarification has faults in itself - wrong doctor naming, and wrong spelling/description of the medicine:
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1312451937757876224/photo/1
https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1312479289531539456/photo/1
https://twitter.com/TheSteveHolzer/status/1312474399795150848

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1312474922447323137

Some have noted unusual traits in the current tweets coming from Trump's personal account too, suggesting help from other people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 03, 2020, 12:35:36 PM


https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2020/10/03/trump-covid-live-updates/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2020/10/03/trump-covid-live-updates/)

Quote
The White House on Saturday created a startling amount of confusion on the timing of President Trump's coronavirus diagnosis and the status of his health through a series of conflicting statements, injecting an extraordinary degree of uncertainty

Quote
WH chief of staff says Trump's vitals over past 24 hours are 'very concerning
Quote
White House chief of staff says 'next 48 hours critical'

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 03, 2020, 03:17:09 PM
Contract Tracing, Key to Reining in the Virus, Falls Flat in the West

Tracing is seen as a vital tool to avoid lockdowns and open economies, but that requires a robust system, widespread rapid testing and public trust. All are lacking in the West. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/world/europe/covid-contract-tracing.html)


Quote from: Benjamin MuellerThe West also ran up against the blunt fact that contact tracing, while useful in containing limited cases, has become overwhelmed by a new explosion of infections. In the past week, Europe has averaged about 60,000 new daily cases, while the United States is registering more than 40,000.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 03, 2020, 03:24:02 PM
Dear Donald,

Please get better.
Then lose the election.
Then leave office.
Then face charges.

xoxo — George
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 04, 2020, 03:24:21 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 03, 2020, 03:24:02 PM
Dear Donald,

Please get better.
Then lose the election.
Then leave office.
Then face charges.

xoxo — George

My thoughts exactly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 04, 2020, 07:59:44 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 03, 2020, 03:17:09 PM
Contract Tracing, Key to Reining in the Virus, Falls Flat in the West

Tracing is seen as a vital tool to avoid lockdowns and open economies, but that requires a robust system, widespread rapid testing and public trust. All are lacking in the West. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/world/europe/covid-contract-tracing.html)

These two links lead to the same article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 04, 2020, 08:12:52 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 03, 2020, 03:17:09 PM
Contract Tracing, Key to Reining in the Virus, Falls Flat in the West

Tracing is seen as a vital tool to avoid lockdowns and open economies, but that requires a robust system, widespread rapid testing and public trust. All are lacking in the West. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/world/europe/covid-contract-tracing.html)

The above article contains a link to a report which I was very glad to finally see

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957v1.full.pdf

I'm sure I heard Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer of England,  say on a TV conference that the report said that only 20% expressed an intention to self isolate -- maybe I've misread it but that's not what they seem to be saying at all

QuoteOf those who reported having experienced symptoms of COVID-19 in the last seven days, only 18.2% (95% CI 16.4 to 19.9) said they had not left home since developing symptoms.

IMO this is the biggest elephant in the room.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 04, 2020, 11:52:50 AM
Probably a quite fair evaluation of today's medical briefing about #45. But the medical team seems to have lost some credibility.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1312792223428165633.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 05, 2020, 07:59:12 AM
More superspreading
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/05/trump-press-secretary-kayleigh-mcenany-tests-positive-for-coronavirus.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 05, 2020, 08:43:40 AM
Thanks.  I saw that earlier on CNN.  Apparently, at least so far, she hasn't been experiencing any symptoms.  I did also see (same article) that three White House reporters have contacted the virus--no idea who.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 05, 2020, 08:46:00 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 05, 2020, 08:43:40 AM
Thanks.  I saw that earlier on CNN.  Apparently, at least so far, she hasn't been experiencing any symptoms.  I did also see (same article) that three White House reporters have contacted the virus--no idea who.

PD

The story about the reporters has been circulating for days, but I've seen no names mentioned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 05, 2020, 10:01:41 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 05, 2020, 08:46:00 AM
The story about the reporters has been circulating for days, but I've seen no names mentioned.

From the WP:

Quote
One of three journalists who work at the White House and have tested positive for the coronavirus in the past week said that more than a week after he believes he became infected, White House staffers have not reached out to him about contact tracing.
"Nobody from the White House has said 'boo' and asked anything about where I was or who I talked to or who else I might have infected," New York Times correspondent Michael D. Shear said Monday in an interview on CNN. "And so I think that that just shows you that they're not taking it seriously, at least as it pertains to themselves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 05, 2020, 10:12:34 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/05/cdc-revises-coronavirus-guidance-to-acknowledge-that-it-spreads-through-airborne-transmission.html

Shows what a f**g travesty the CDC has become under the Orange Pustule administration.
Just a few weeks ago the CDC released "guidance" (which no intelligent person believed) denying aerosol transmission.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 05, 2020, 11:34:41 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 05, 2020, 08:46:00 AM
The story about the reporters has been circulating for days, but I've seen no names mentioned.

Nevertheless, if I was, say, Yamiche Alcindor, I would be concerned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2020, 05:39:25 AM
These quotes from Pres. Trump (from the BBC website) made me roll my eyes:

"Mr Trump also recorded a video message, urging Americans to get back to work."

"'You're going to beat it [coronavirus],' he told them, adding: 'We're going to be out front. As your leader, I had to do that. I knew there's danger to it, but I had to do it. I stood out front, and led.'
Mr Trump also speculated: 'Now I'm better, maybe I'm immune, I don't know'".

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 06, 2020, 06:39:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2020, 05:39:25 AM
These quotes from Pres. Trump (from the BBC website) made me roll my eyes:

"Mr Trump also recorded a video message, urging Americans to get back to work."

"'You're going to beat it [coronavirus],' he told them, adding: 'We're going to be out front. As your leader, I had to do that. I knew there's danger to it, but I had to do it. I stood out front, and led.'
Mr Trump also speculated: 'Now I'm better, maybe I'm immune, I don't know'".

PD

Now you'll never see masks at the White House or any Orange Pustule rallies, etc. "Fuck you, I already had it, I got antibodies!"

And...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/06/white-house-nixes-updated-fda-guidelines-on-vaccine-approval.html

"Mr. Covid" knows more than the scientists. But then the GOP denies science in general.

If no paywall, check *this* out:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-06/trump-invokes-his-own-bout-with-covid-as-voters-doubts-grow
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2020, 06:46:21 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 06, 2020, 06:39:51 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/06/white-house-nixes-updated-fda-guidelines-on-vaccine-approval.html

"Mr. Covid" knows more than the scientists. But then the GOP denies science in general.

If no paywall, check *this* out:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-06/trump-invokes-his-own-bout-with-covid-as-voters-doubts-grow
God help us.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 06, 2020, 09:46:33 AM
Well, doctors in Germany and Denmark find his treatment and early departure strange, highly unusual and supposedly not recommendable, based on the information they were given; I don't know if they've seen the recent balcony scene, where he obviously still had problems breathing, in spite of his claims.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 06, 2020, 10:04:49 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 06, 2020, 09:46:33 AM
Well, doctors in Germany and Denmark find his treatment and early departure strange, highly unusual and supposedly not recommendable, based on the information they were given; I don't know if they've seen the recent balcony scene, where he obviously still had problems breathing, in spite of his claims.

Dopey denial on parade.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 06, 2020, 12:26:26 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 06, 2020, 09:46:33 AM
Well, doctors in Germany and Denmark find his treatment and early departure strange, highly unusual and supposedly not recommendable, based on the information they were given; I don't know if they've seen the recent balcony scene, where he obviously still had problems breathing, in spite of his claims.

In the Netherlands too, they are mentioning the risk of a sudden relapse.

And  they are not the only ones...

Dr Anthony Fauci, the top infectious disease expert in the US, has warned that US president Donald Trump's condition could worsen over the coming days. 'He looks fine,' Dr Fauci told CNN's Chris Cuomo. 'The issue is that it is still early enough in the disease', Fauci said. 'Sometimes when you're five to eight days in you can have a reversal'. 

https://www.theguardian.com/global/video/2020/oct/06/its-still-early-anthony-fauci-warns-trumps-condition-could-reverse-video

But Trump doesn't listen to Fauci anyway...  ;)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 06, 2020, 04:58:11 PM
The superspreader chronicles continue:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54441986

Covid: White House aide tests positive as military leaders quarantine

Covid-19 is spreading further among those close to President Trump, with White House advisor Stephen Miller and a senior military official infected.

Mr Miller, who has been self-isolating for the past five days, confirmed he had contracted coronavirus on Tuesday.

Top US General Mark Milley and other military leaders are also quarantining after Coast Guard official Admiral Charles Ray tested positive.

Other officials are self-isolating "out of an abundance of caution".

Adm Ray, vice commandant of the US Coast Guard, is said to be experiencing mild symptoms.


And there are likely many more cases that the Orange Pustule administration has managed to suppress.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 06, 2020, 05:00:32 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-06/pence-wants-no-plexiglass-for-his-side-during-debate-with-harris

Vice President Mike Pence doesn't want a plexiglass divider for his side of the stage during Wednesday's vice-presidential debate with Kamala Harris, according to his aides.

Marc Short, Pence's chief of staff, told the Washington Post that their team does not view plexiglass dividers as medically necessary, given that the two debaters will be more than 12 feet apart. Short, who has led Pence's debate preparations, told the Post that if Harris "wants it, she's more than welcome to surround herself with plexiglass if that makes her feel more comfortable."

Katie Miller, a spokesperson for Pence, confirmed Short's comments to the Post. She did not respond to several subsequent messages asking for further detail.

Sabrina Singh, a Harris spokesperson said the Democratic vice-presidential nominee will respect the measures recommended by the Cleveland Clinic, which is advising the Commission on Presidential Debates on precautions against infection by the coronavirus.

"If the Trump administration's war on masks has now become a war on safety shields, that tells you everything you need to know about why their Covid response is a failure," Singh said.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 07, 2020, 07:52:34 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/07/trump-advisor-corey-lewandowski-spotted-without-mask-after-coronavirus-concern.html

Trump advisor Corey Lewandowski spotted at football game without mask after saying he would self-isolate due to coronavirus concern

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-07/trump-and-covid-inside-the-infected-president-s-ill-advised-trip-to-bedminster

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/07/trump-coronavirus-buzzfeed-pulls-white-house-reporter-after-aides-dont-wear-masks.html

BuzzFeed News pulled its political reporter out of the White House press pool on Wednesday.
Trump administration aides in the facility have "largely not worn masks" or abided by other basic coronavirus protections, the news site said.
BuzzFeed's decision to withdraw journalist Kadia Goba came after photos showed White House aides standing outside the White House not wearing masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 07, 2020, 01:40:58 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 07, 2020, 07:52:34 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/07/trump-advisor-corey-lewandowski-spotted-without-mask-after-coronavirus-concern.html

Trump advisor Corey Lewandowski spotted at football game without mask after saying he would self-isolate due to coronavirus concern

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-07/trump-and-covid-inside-the-infected-president-s-ill-advised-trip-to-bedminster

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/07/trump-coronavirus-buzzfeed-pulls-white-house-reporter-after-aides-dont-wear-masks.html


You see, without people self isolating all the test and trace in the world is worthless. And no western government wants to either support or coerce people into doing it. They want people to do it voluntarily even though it's hard, it costs, and they may not even be contagious, so it could all be for nothing. I think this is unrealistic.


This is IMO, a major elephant in the room and it could well be the reason we're all doomed, doomed!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 07, 2020, 02:11:09 PM
Quote from: Que on October 06, 2020, 12:26:26 PM
In the Netherlands too, they are mentioning the risk of a sudden relapse.

And  they are not the only ones...

Dr Anthony Fauci, the top infectious disease expert in the US, has warned that US president Donald Trump's condition could worsen over the coming days. 'He looks fine,' Dr Fauci told CNN's Chris Cuomo. 'The issue is that it is still early enough in the disease', Fauci said. 'Sometimes when you're five to eight days in you can have a reversal'.

https://www.theguardian.com/global/video/2020/oct/06/its-still-early-anthony-fauci-warns-trumps-condition-could-reverse-video

But Trump doesn't listen to Fauci anyway...  ;)

Some say that he'll probably need a similar, strong treatment in a few weeks; that the alleged antibodies are not his own, but the result of a massive, sudden medication with them, making the doctor's statement incomplete, and the future uncertain; that he hasn't been 'cured'.
https://twitter.com/florian_krammer/status/1313895401380954112

He is now promising the same treatment 'for free' for all Americans, 'distributed by the military', in a video, apparently in three parts, and not with the breathing problems of the balcony scene
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-donald-trump-promises-to-make-the-covid-19-treatment-he-had-free-for-all-americans-12098760
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 07, 2020, 04:25:12 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-07/white-house-security-official-contracted-covid-19-in-september

A top White House security official, Crede Bailey, is gravely ill with Covid-19 and has been hospitalized since September, according to four people familiar with his condition.

The White House has not publicly disclosed Bailey's illness. He became sick before the Sept. 26 Rose Garden event President Donald Trump held to announce his Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett that has been connected to more than a dozen cases of the disease.
A White House spokesman declined to comment on Bailey. He is in charge of the White House security office, which handles credentialing for access to the White House and works closely with the U.S. Secret Service on security measures throughout the compound.


More superspreading:

A Top Marine Officer Tests Positive for Virus
The assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, General Gary L. Thomas, has tested positive for the coronavirus, a spokesman for the Marines said on Wednesday.
"He had been in self-quarantine since Tuesday, Oct. 6, out of an abundance of caution following notification of close contact with a person who later tested positive for the virus," the spokesman, Captain Joseph Butterfield, said in a statement.


"He is experiencing mild symptoms, but otherwise is feeling well," Butterfield added.

Several members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, including General Mark Milley, the top American military officer, are also in self quarantine after the Coast Guard's vice commandant tested positive for the virus.






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 07, 2020, 10:56:59 PM
Time for some good news! :)

Coronavirus: How pandemic sparked European cycling revolution (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54353914) (BBC)

Of course here in the Netherlands everybody already bikes...
Though even here there has been an considerable increase in biking. People now buy electric bikes to cover longer distances and replace bus and short train rides.

Get ready for cleaner, quieter, healthier and safer cities that are more pleasant to live in. :)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 08, 2020, 08:49:33 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/07/coronavirus-outbreaks-sweep-through-great-plains-states-as-wisconsin-activates-field-hospital-.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 08, 2020, 09:41:04 AM
Quote from: Que on October 07, 2020, 10:56:59 PM
Time for some good news! :)

Coronavirus: How pandemic sparked European cycling revolution (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54353914) (BBC)

Of course here in the Netherlands everybody already bikes...
Though even here there has been an considerable increase in biking. People now buy electric bikes to cover longer distances and replace bus and short train rides.

Get ready for cleaner, quieter, healthier and safer cities that are more pleasant to live in. :)

Q
I like this news Q!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 08, 2020, 12:37:38 PM
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54472053

Top Republican Mitch McConnell avoids White House over Covid-19

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

The Kentucky Senator said he speaks to the president frequently over the phone but has not visited since 6 August.

Mr McConnell, a polio survivor, contrasted the White House with the Senate, where lawmakers are urged to wear masks and social distance.

His comments come as the White House deals with a Covid-19 outbreak.

Since President Donald Trump's Covid-19 diagnosis, at least two dozen people in his circle and staff at the White House have reported infections.

Speaking to reporters in Kentucky, Mr McConnell said he steered clear of the White House in the last two months "because my impression was their approach to how to handle this was different from mine".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 08, 2020, 01:53:18 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 08, 2020, 09:41:04 AM
I like this news Q!

Nice!  I can hardly wait for my arm and hand to recover sufficiently that I can bike again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 08, 2020, 09:18:36 PM
A longer read in The Atlantic:

This Overlooked Variable Is the Key to the Pandemic
It's not R. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/09/k-overlooked-variable-driving-pandemic/616548/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 08, 2020, 09:44:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on October 08, 2020, 09:18:36 PM
A longer read in The Atlantic:

This Overlooked Variable Is the Key to the Pandemic
It's not R. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/09/k-overlooked-variable-driving-pandemic/616548/)

Thanks, that's a really good article (I have training in statistics).
Interestingly, a couple of days ago I read a (less comprehensive) article that touched on the backward tracing mentioned:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-06/michael-lewis-and-tracing-the-source-of-trump-s-covid-infection
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 05:41:06 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 06, 2020, 09:46:33 AM
Well, doctors in Germany and Denmark find his treatment and early departure strange, highly unusual and supposedly not recommendable, based on the information they were given; I don't know if they've seen the recent balcony scene, where he obviously still had problems breathing, in spite of his claims.

The Trump administration will not disclose when Trump had his last negative test, which means those doctors and the rest of us don't know how long Trump has had Covid-19 or whether his release was in fact an "early departure." I would suspect that Trump did rallies, fund raisers, and the debate last Tuesday after he had tested positive — with his usual callous disregard for the health and well being of others. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 09, 2020, 05:54:37 AM
Maybe the problem is that he has abstained from testing for a long time, finding it uncomfortable, and also sufficient enough that those around him were tested, like some are suggesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 06:00:13 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 09, 2020, 05:54:37 AM
Maybe the problem is that he has abstained from testing for a long time, finding it uncomfortable, and also sufficient enough that those around him were tested, like some are suggesting.

Nah. More likely he was infected and knew he was infected, but calculated that he needed a good showing in the first debate, money from his big donors, and a photo op for his supreme court pick. So, as long as he was not visibly disabled, he continued his normal activities without regard to the danger he posed to others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 09, 2020, 06:35:51 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 05:41:06 AM
The Trump administration will not disclose when Trump had his last negative test, which means those doctors and the rest of us don't know how long Trump has had Covid-19 or whether his release was in fact an "early departure." I would suspect that Trump did rallies, fund raisers, and the debate last Tuesday after he had tested positive — with his usual callous disregard for the health and well being of others. 

Count on Trump to bullshit and deflect, and count on doctors on whom Trump has leverage to disinform.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 09, 2020, 06:37:58 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 09, 2020, 06:35:51 AM
Count on Trump to bullshit and deflect, and count on doctors on whom Trump has leverage to disinform.

From what I've read, they signed a non-disclosure form years ago, possibly with the exception of two of them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 09, 2020, 06:50:54 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 06:00:13 AM
Nah. More likely he was infected and knew he was infected, but calculated that he needed a good showing in the first debate, money from his big donors, and a photo op for his supreme court pick. So, as long as he was not visibly disabled, he continued his normal activities without regard to the danger he posed to others.

You almost make it look as if Trump himself was the super spreader in the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 07:02:16 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on October 09, 2020, 06:50:54 AM
You always make it look as if Trump himself was the super spreader in the White House.

Always? That's funny. I don't think I've written about it before this morning. Trump's responsibility for the super spreader event likely has nothing to do with him personally infecting people, although he might have. It's insisting on gatherings where wearing masks is discouraged. His disregard for the well being of others isn't in dispute, is it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 09, 2020, 07:16:15 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on October 09, 2020, 07:02:16 AM
Always? That's funny. I don't think I've written about it before this morning. Trump's responsibility for the super spreader event likely has nothing to do with him personally infecting people, although he might have. It's insisting on gatherings where wearing masks is discouraged. His disregard for the well being of others isn't in dispute, is it?

Sorry, I meant almost, not always (I have edited the post above).

Of course Trump's behavior is condemnable, and if he has been infected earlier, than his doctors are willing to tell, even more condemnable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 09, 2020, 07:46:30 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on October 09, 2020, 07:16:15 AM
Sorry, I meant almost, not always (I have edited the post above).

Of course Trump's behavior is condemnable, and if he has been infected earlier, than his doctors are willing to tell, even more condemnable.

I posted this link a while back...If the White House wanted to know/disclose more about the chain of White House infections, it wouldn't be hard/costly to investigate:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-06/michael-lewis-and-tracing-the-source-of-trump-s-covid-infection

Needless to say, don't hold your breath.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8822057/Trump-coughs-phone-interview-appears-mute-mic.html

Did Trump mute his line to cover up a coughing fit? Hoarse president goes silent after clearing his throat during phone interview and then coughs after coming back despite glowing doctor's note praising his vitals
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 09, 2020, 12:08:56 PM
It's official!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-09/fauci-calls-white-house-ceremony-a-super-spreader-event

"The data speak for themselves," Fauci said in an interview Friday with CBS News Radio. "We had a super-spreader event in the White House. And it was in a situation where people were crowded together, were not wearing masks. So the data speaks for themselves."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 09, 2020, 02:09:24 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 09, 2020, 12:08:56 PM
It's official!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-09/fauci-calls-white-house-ceremony-a-super-spreader-event

"The data speak for themselves," Fauci said in an interview Friday with CBS News Radio. "We had a super-spreader event in the White House. And it was in a situation where people were crowded together, were not wearing masks. So the data speaks for themselves."

A tweet from the Denier-in-Chief in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 09, 2020, 03:24:14 PM
Herd immunity letter signed by fake experts including 'Dr Johnny Bananas' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts-dr-johnny-bananas-covid)

"An open letter that made headlines calling for a herd immunity approach to Covid-19 lists a number of apparently fake names among its expert signatories, including "Dr Johnny Bananas" and "Professor Cominic Dummings".

The Great Barrington declaration, which was said to have been signed by more than 15,000 scientists and medical practitioners around the world, was found by Sky News to contain numerous false names, as well as those of several homeopaths.

Others listed include a resident at the "university of your mum" and another supposed specialist whose name was the first verse of the Macarena.

Sky News discovered 18 self-declared homeopaths in the list of expert names and more than 100 therapists whose expertise included massage, hypnotherapy and Mongolian khoomii singing."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 09, 2020, 03:30:06 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 09, 2020, 12:08:56 PM
It's official!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-09/fauci-calls-white-house-ceremony-a-super-spreader-event

"The data speak for themselves," Fauci said in an interview Friday with CBS News Radio. "We had a super-spreader event in the White House. And it was in a situation where people were crowded together, were not wearing masks. So the data speaks for themselves."
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 09, 2020, 02:09:24 PM
A tweet from the Denier-in-Chief in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

Quite a unique achievement, IMO. All other super-spreader events I've read of took place indoors. This one, seemingly at the Rose Garden, appears to qualify as outdoors!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 10, 2020, 05:11:08 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-10/debate-site-covid-cases-sow-doubt-on-safety-of-indoor-events

A coronavirus outbreak among attendees at last week's presidential debate in Cleveland -- and 11 near-misses from people denied entry because of positive test results -- is stoking questions about the safety of convening another in-person session.

The health risks are central any more go-rounds between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, with the commission overseeing the forums canceling the Oct. 15 event after the Trump campaign balked at a newly proposed virtual format.

Trump and at least five aides and advisers involved in preparing him for the Cleveland debate have been diagnosed with Covid-19, along with 11 construction workers and members of the media who were barred from the site after testing positive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 10, 2020, 01:33:28 PM
Even Europe's gold standard nations are struggling with Covid surges, and it's not winter yet (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/europe/europes-gold-standard-countries-struggling-analysis-intl/index.html)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 10, 2020, 03:39:45 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/tooE1jp.jpg)

     

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 10, 2020, 10:01:32 PM
Quote from: Todd on October 10, 2020, 01:33:28 PM
Even Europe's gold standard nations are struggling with Covid surges, and it's not winter yet (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/europe/europes-gold-standard-countries-struggling-analysis-intl/index.html)

This seems true

QuoteWhich brings us back to the rock and the hard place where governments find themselves: the only way to guarantee reducing infection rates is to lock people down, yet every lockdown carries the risk of public fatigue leading to a lack of compliance.

And that non commitment on the part of the public means that you can't ever come out of hard lockdown, or you have to turn the country into a sort of health police state, which may itself not be tolerated.

The problem is that lockdown is the only solution being considered, and as a way of dealing with the disease it's too painful to endure. The cure is worse than the disease.  The medical solution will be slow to come, and the money to finance the fallout of lockdown will run out fast,  and anyway the people won't tolerate being forced to let their lives stagnate. And all this for what exactly?

Quite scary though, when you open your eyes to the situation we find ourselves in. I confess to being thoroughly scared by it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 11, 2020, 12:50:59 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 10, 2020, 01:33:28 PM
Even Europe's gold standard nations are struggling with Covid surges, and it's not winter yet (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/europe/europes-gold-standard-countries-struggling-analysis-intl/index.html)

Yep, the whole thing is going sideways......

Though I wouldn't describe The Netherlands and the Czech Republic as "golden standard nations"

That title goes to Germany, which still does extremely well.
It has an extensive and rigorous test & trace system and benefited from starting out with a low and localised infection level.

Test and trace capacity and organisation is a failure in many countries, including the Netherlands.
That and a reluctance to take really strict measures is doing us in.... It's going to be bad,  economically as well.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 11, 2020, 01:23:50 AM
 I'm not sure I understand what's happening in Germany. I mean, the Germans went on holiday to Spain in July and August and brought the disease back home. Are German universities and high schools open? Do Germans behave better in pubs and parties? In the UK only 20% of people say they comply with requests to self isolate - are Germans more committed and cooperative? Yes they had a better test and trace infrastructure, but all the testing and tracing in the world is useless if the people can't or won't cooperate!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 11, 2020, 02:27:12 AM
Quote from: Que on October 11, 2020, 12:50:59 AM
That title goes to Germany, which still does extremely well.

The Scandinavian countries (except Sweden) are indeed doing better than Germany, but of course we are not that many.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 11, 2020, 04:58:49 AM
Quote from: Que on October 11, 2020, 12:50:59 AMThat and a reluctance to take really strict measures is doing us in.... It's going to be bad,  economically as well.


2021 is already shot.  Some/many/most people want to pretend otherwise.  I'd say 2022 is pretty much toast, too, from both an economic and public health perspective.  Maybe even 2023.  No one, anywhere, has described in detail how widespread, effective vaccination programs combined with proper, societal-scale social distancing will work effectively for long periods with a disease that mutates, transmits quickly and efficiently, will likely require ongoing boosters to maintain immunity, and will become endemic to humanity. 

The complete destruction of some service industries all over the world combined with a mandatory shift to remote work in many sectors will serve to exacerbate inequality across the entire West.  Expect political turmoil across the "developed" world in the next several years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 11, 2020, 05:50:30 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 11, 2020, 04:58:49 AM

2021 is already shot.  Some/many/most people want to pretend otherwise.  I'd say 2022 is pretty much toast, too, from both an economic and public health perspective.  Maybe even 2023.  No one, anywhere, has described in detail how widespread, effective vaccination programs combined with proper, societal-scale social distancing will work effectively for long periods with a disease that mutates, transmits quickly and efficiently, will likely require ongoing boosters to maintain immunity, and will will become endemic to humanity. 

The complete destruction of some service industries all over the world combined with a mandatory shift to remote work in many sectors will serve to exacerbate inequality across the entire West.  Expect political turmoil across the "developed" world in the next several years.

Expect social turmoil too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 11, 2020, 07:31:22 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-11/coronavirus-can-persist-for-four-weeks-on-banknotes-study-finds

And many non-porous surfaces, esp. at lower temperatures.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wisconsin-is-battling-americas-worst-coronavirus-outbreak-and-the-states-broken-politics-is-partially-to-blame-143650745.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 11, 2020, 08:04:26 AM

     The worst mutations of the virus will turn out to be the ones that spread around the world in early 2020. By late 2021 we should be seeing the effects of herd immunity for these strains and that will provide protection for new ones. People will get sick with fewer hospitalizations and death rates will continue to go down.

     This is a pessimistic view of recovery for the US:

     (https://i1.wp.com/www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ES_20200430_Hutchins_recovery_L_shape-01.png?w=768&crop=0%2C0px%2C100%2C9999px&ssl=1)

     This should look familiar as it's not so different from the Obama recovery that Trump inherited.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 11, 2020, 02:25:43 PM
Quote from: drogulus on October 11, 2020, 08:04:26 AM
     The worst mutations of the virus will turn out to be the ones that spread around the world in early 2020. By late 2021 we should be seeing the effects of herd immunity for these strains and that will provide protection for new ones. People will get sick with fewer hospitalizations and death rates will continue to go down.

I worship your optimistic approach, but how do you know that we are not going to see even worse mutiations of the virus in the future.

And heard immunity (without a vaccine) is only achieved when a large part of the population has been infected and this will cause a lot of deaths, apart from the fact that we do not know how long postinfective immunity lasts.

But again I worship your optimism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 11, 2020, 03:29:36 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on October 11, 2020, 02:25:43 PM
I worship your optimistic approach, but how do you know that we are not going to see even worse mutiations of the virus in the future.


     We might see a mutation that would have been worse if it had been the first one we contracted. More worrisome would be another novel virus genetically dissimilar to this one.

Quote from: (: premont :) on October 11, 2020, 02:25:43 PM

And heard immunity (without a vaccine) is only achieved when a large part of the population has been infected and this will cause a lot of deaths, apart from the fact that we do not know how long postinfective immunity lasts.


     Herd immunity includes the vaccine. While immunity might fade, it won't disappear, so reinfected people won't get as sick, if they get sick at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 11, 2020, 04:12:52 PM
Quote from: drogulus on October 11, 2020, 03:29:36 PMWe might see a mutation that would have been worse if it had been the first one we contracted. More worrisome would be another novel virus genetically dissimilar to this one.
Since many mammals seem to be susceptible to this virus, we might well soon see a more virulent mutation of Covid Sars2 originating in another animal and afterwards infecting humans.

Quote from: drogulusHerd immunity includes the vaccine. While immunity might fade, it won't disappear, so reinfected people won't get as sick, if they get sick at all.
Hope you are right. Certainly your prediction depends upon the existence of an efficient vaccine, which is capable of creating a sufficient immune response in humans. We have no guarantee of this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 11, 2020, 07:06:44 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on October 11, 2020, 04:12:52 PM

Hope you are right. Certainly your prediction depends upon the existence of an efficient vaccine, which is capable of creating a sufficient immune response in humans. We have no guarantee of this.

     The vaccine will be kind of mediocre, and not for Trumpist reasons, but because vaccines often are. It would be great if it was 70%, but I think they are targeting a minimum of 50%, which will work fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 11, 2020, 11:15:59 PM
Typical Orange Pustule Big Lie:

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54504096

Top US government scientist Anthony Fauci has said a clip of him used in a Trump campaign advert is misleading.

In it, Dr Fauci says he "can't imagine that anybody could be doing more" to fight Covid-19, suggesting he endorses Mr Trump's handling of the crisis.

Dr Fauci, who clashed with Mr Trump before on Covid, says he was talking about himself and other officials.

The infectious diseases expert said he had never publicly endorsed any political candidate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 12, 2020, 04:35:11 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 11, 2020, 11:15:59 PM
Typical Orange Pustule Big Lie:

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54504096

Top US government scientist Anthony Fauci has said a clip of him used in a Trump campaign advert is misleading.

In it, Dr Fauci says he "can't imagine that anybody could be doing more" to fight Covid-19, suggesting he endorses Mr Trump's handling of the crisis.

Dr Fauci, who clashed with Mr Trump before on Covid, says he was talking about himself and other officials.

The infectious diseases expert said he had never publicly endorsed any political candidate.



Is this a Coronavirus post or a US Politics post?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 12, 2020, 05:18:40 AM
Of course, some do have an insatiable appetite for Trumpland Fake News.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 12, 2020, 06:27:06 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 12, 2020, 04:35:11 AM

Is this a Coronavirus post or a US Politics post?

     I think so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 12, 2020, 06:55:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on October 12, 2020, 06:27:06 AM
     I think so.

A lesson to us all: once a Diner Cop, you may never unclench.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:06:19 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 12, 2020, 04:35:11 AM

Is this a Coronavirus post or a US Politics post?

How can you tell when Covid-19 was so completely politicized in the US?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 12, 2020, 08:08:39 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-12/u-s-trails-other-developed-nations-in-curbing-virus-deaths
U.S. Virus-Death Rate Is World's Worst Among Developed Nations

The proportion of Americans dying from coronavirus infections is the highest in the developed world, according to a study released Monday that shows the U.S. pandemic response left citizens exposed to the lethal disease.
...
Early in the outbreak, the U.S. mortality rate from Covid-19 was lower than in many other hard-hit countries, including the U.K., Spain and the Netherlands, according to the report Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But as spring turned to summer, the U.S. largely failed to embrace public-health and policy measures that have helped other countries reduce death rates.
...
If U.S. deaths after May 10 had occurred at the same pace as in Spain, the U.S. mortality rate would be 47% lower, with 93,247 fewer people dying, the report found. More than 100,000 fewer Americans would have died if the U.S. had the same mortality rate as the Netherlands. Sweden's mortality rate was 22% lower, though it took fewer steps to curb the virus's spread.

The U.S. leads the world in total coronavirus deaths, with 214,776 as of Monday, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. Brazil ranks second with 150,488 deaths.
...
Since the global chaos of the virus's first wave abated, "it's quite clear that the United States has been worse than every other country, including high mortality countries, in responding to the outbreak," Emanuel said. "That has produced tens of thousands, if not 100,000 deaths from Covid."
...
An update of another study conducted earlier this year suggests the U.S. also hasn't corralled excess mortality associated with the pandemic. The analysis takes into account factors such as a decline in fatal motor-vehicle accidents and increased deaths from delayed treatment for heart attacks and strokes.
...
The number of U.S. deaths caused directly or indirectly by the pandemic is 20% higher than the public counts of virus deaths detailed daily in the news, said Steven Woolf, director emeritus of the Center on Society and Health at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond.

More than 400,000 excess deaths are expected to occur in 2020, said Howard Bauchner, editor-in-chief of JAMA, and Phil Fontanarosa, the executive editor, in an editorial in the medical journal on Monday.


"These deaths reflect a true measure of the human cost of the Great Pandemic of 2020," they wrote.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 12, 2020, 08:17:50 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:06:19 AM
How can you tell when Covid-19 was so completely politicized in the US?


It's easy for me.  It's not easy for others based on posts in this thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:20:00 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 12, 2020, 08:08:39 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-12/u-s-trails-other-developed-nations-in-curbing-virus-deaths
U.S. Virus-Death Rate Is World's Worst Among Developed Nations

The proportion of Americans dying from coronavirus infections is the highest in the developed world, according to a study released Monday that shows the U.S. pandemic response left citizens exposed to the lethal disease.
...
Early in the outbreak, the U.S. mortality rate from Covid-19 was lower than in many other hard-hit countries, including the U.K., Spain and the Netherlands, according to the report Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But as spring turned to summer, the U.S. largely failed to embrace public-health and policy measures that have helped other countries reduce death rates.
...
If U.S. deaths after May 10 had occurred at the same pace as in Spain, the U.S. mortality rate would be 47% lower, with 93,247 fewer people dying, the report found. More than 100,000 fewer Americans would have died if the U.S. had the same mortality rate as the Netherlands. Sweden's mortality rate was 22% lower, though it took fewer steps to curb the virus's spread.

The U.S. leads the world in total coronavirus deaths, with 214,776 as of Monday, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. Brazil ranks second with 150,488 deaths.
...
Since the global chaos of the virus's first wave abated, "it's quite clear that the United States has been worse than every other country, including high mortality countries, in responding to the outbreak," Emanuel said. "That has produced tens of thousands, if not 100,000 deaths from Covid."
...
An update of another study conducted earlier this year suggests the U.S. also hasn't corralled excess mortality associated with the pandemic. The analysis takes into account factors such as a decline in fatal motor-vehicle accidents and increased deaths from delayed treatment for heart attacks and strokes.
...
The number of U.S. deaths caused directly or indirectly by the pandemic is 20% higher than the public counts of virus deaths detailed daily in the news, said Steven Woolf, director emeritus of the Center on Society and Health at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond.

More than 400,000 excess deaths are expected to occur in 2020, said Howard Bauchner, editor-in-chief of JAMA, and Phil Fontanarosa, the executive editor, in an editorial in the medical journal on Monday.


"These deaths reflect a true measure of the human cost of the Great Pandemic of 2020," they wrote.


The US as a society is exceptionally bad at dealing with a pandemic like this. Weak social safety nets, for profit healthcare, incompetent leaders, ignorant scientifically illiterate people who easily believe conspiracy theories and their moronic cult leader etc. all happening during an electric election year! It is a perfect storm.  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:21:53 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 12, 2020, 08:17:50 AM

It's easy for me.  It's not easy for others based on posts in this thread.

The fact that you asked: "Is this a Coronavirus post or a US Politics post?" indicates otherwise.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 12, 2020, 08:29:52 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:21:53 AM
The fact that you asked: "Is this a Coronavirus post or a US Politics post?" indicates otherwise.  :-\


To ESL posters.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 12, 2020, 08:44:33 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:20:00 AM
The US as a society is exceptionally bad at dealing with a pandemic like this. Weak social safety nets, for profit healthcare, incompetent leaders, ignorant scientifically illiterate people who easily believe conspiracy theories and their moronic cult leader etc. all happening during an electric election year! It is a perfect storm.  ???

Not to be a smartass with "I told you so", but...I predicted back at the beginning of March that the US would be the "first world" nation hardest hit by COVID. It was really obvious. For most of the reasons you gave, but especially the ones I boldfaced above.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 12, 2020, 09:23:07 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 12, 2020, 08:20:00 AM
The US as a society is exceptionally bad at dealing with a pandemic like this. Weak social safety nets, for profit healthcare, incompetent leaders, ignorant scientifically illiterate people who easily believe conspiracy theories and their moronic cult leader etc. all happening during an electric election year! It is a perfect storm.  ???

All of the above are true... but I think that with competent leadership, we're capable of coming together and sticking to mitigation measures that have proven effective elsewhere. So I'd put the current leadership vacuum created by the lunatic in the White House at the top of your list. The US certainly has no monopoly on innumerate and scientifically illiterate people, they exist and are probably even in the majority worldwide. And unfortunately we are not going to completely replace for-profit healthcare any time soon.

The single most important thing we can do this election year to turn the pandemic around is replace the current leadership with competent people who disseminate correct advice on mitigation from experts. The next thing is for everyone to comply with that advice. More easily said than done, unfortunately, but I'm hopeful that we will do the right thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 12, 2020, 10:39:55 AM
Quote from: krummholz on October 12, 2020, 09:23:07 AM
All of the above are true... but I think that with competent leadership, we're capable of coming together and sticking to mitigation measures that have proven effective elsewhere. So I'd put the current leadership vacuum created by the lunatic in the White House at the top of your list. The US certainly has no monopoly on innumerate and scientifically illiterate people, they exist and are probably even in the majority worldwide. And unfortunately we are not going to completely replace for-profit healthcare any time soon.

The single most important thing we can do this election year to turn the pandemic around is replace the current leadership with competent people who disseminate correct advice on mitigation from experts. The next thing is for everyone to comply with that advice. More easily said than done, unfortunately, but I'm hopeful that we will do the right thing.

Heartily agreed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 13, 2020, 02:22:49 PM
Coronavirus cases are rising in U.S., sparking worries the next big wave has begun

Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said on Monday he hopes the numbers "jolt the American public into a realization that we really can't let this happen, because it's on a trajectory of getting worse and worse." In a CNN interview, he called the rising numbers "the worst possible thing that could happen as we get into the cooler months." (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/10/13/coronavirus-cases-rising/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 13, 2020, 02:59:56 PM
Neat animated display:

https://dangoodspeed.com/covid/total-cases-since-june

Arguably this could be posted on the US politics thread instead, but clicking there makes me feel I need a delousing (or worse), so no thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 13, 2020, 04:51:41 PM
Lilly CEO Says Covid Will Be 'Endemic,' Even With Vaccines: Q&A

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-13/lilly-ceo-says-covid-will-be-endemic-even-with-vaccines-q-a
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 13, 2020, 05:14:19 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 13, 2020, 04:51:41 PM
Lilly CEO Says Covid Will Be 'Endemic,' Even With Vaccines: Q&A

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-13/lilly-ceo-says-covid-will-be-endemic-even-with-vaccines-q-a

Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on October 13, 2020, 09:51:19 PM
52 community outbreaks in the last 7 days in San Diego County.  And I was alarmed when it reached 20 several months ago:

https://sdcounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/30b5e0fa2a5f4404b1219d8cd16b2583
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 13, 2020, 10:13:42 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 13, 2020, 02:22:49 PM
Coronavirus cases are rising in U.S., sparking worries the next big wave has begun

Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said on Monday he hopes the numbers "jolt the American public into a realization that we really can't let this happen, because it's on a trajectory of getting worse and worse." In a CNN interview, he called the rising numbers "the worst possible thing that could happen as we get into the cooler months." (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/10/13/coronavirus-cases-rising/)

I feel sorry for Fauci: he warned about this, did everything in his power to prevent it, and now has to watch it happen.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on October 13, 2020, 10:27:14 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 13, 2020, 02:59:56 PM
Neat animated display:

https://dangoodspeed.com/covid/total-cases-since-june

Arguably this could be posted on the US politics thread instead, but clicking there makes me feel I need a delousing (or worse), so no thanks.
The US don't do politics any more, they do tribal warfare.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 14, 2020, 01:02:23 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 13, 2020, 02:59:56 PM
Arguably this could be posted on the US politics thread instead, but clicking there makes me feel I need a delousing (or worse), so no thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 14, 2020, 03:09:56 AM
Quote from: Que on October 13, 2020, 10:13:42 PM
I feel sorry for Fauci: he warned about this, did everything in his power to prevent it, and now has to watch it happen.

Q

Doctor Fauci is the most stoical man in the US. Anyone else would have exploded because of frustration and anger long ago.  ???

The curse of being intelligent and educated is to becoming depressed when seeing how stupid a lot of people around you are. In my childhood I was able to look up to adults, but when I became an adult myself I realized many adults are actually morons and the society/World has quite a lot of stupidity incorporated. This has made me less happy person. Sometimes I think I would be much happier as an average Joe with less intelligence and education just minding my own business  not worrying about things like American politics... ...as a system thinker (with mild asperger I believe) I see logical connections between things easily and it leads to the realization that there's not really anything one shouldn't think about because things are logically connected.

Coronavirus has been effective in revealing stupidity in individuals and in society. It's an IQ test in the form of a virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 14, 2020, 03:16:38 AM
People tend to misoverestimate (I'm trying to quote Dubya) their own intelligence.

One's unhappiness with one's surroundings is indeed a test of this.

Our smarts, such as they are, are primarily designed, or rather developed, to make us find our place in the world in a successful way.

Other than that people talking about their remarkably high IQs seems to be a standard feature of the internet's anonymity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 14, 2020, 04:11:32 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 14, 2020, 03:16:38 AM
People tend to misoverestimate (I'm trying to quote Dubya) their own intelligence. One's unhappiness with one's surroundings is indeed a test of this. Our smarts, such as they are, are primarily designed, or rather developed, to make us find our place in the world in a successful way.

Other than that people talking about their remarkably high IQs seems to be a standard feature of the internet's anonymity.

Not me. I struggle in life and for some time I thought it's because of low intelligence, but when I tested it I was (positively) surprised. It isn't intelligence that causes my problems. What then? A few years later I heard about Asperger and studied it and realized I seem to be an asperger and it explains my huge difficulties in social situations and my tendency to pay attention to details other people ignore and why I learn new things slowly, but profoundly (learning slowly was the primary reason for me to assume low IQ)*. I have learned that high IQ is not the same thing as happiness. My life can be (and I believe it is) intellectually rich, but that's very different from being a balanced happy person.

* I learn logical connections between things very fast, but everything else is hard for me. I memorize "random" things very poorly. For example I don't know well the capital cities of various countries. Now that I am learning Japanese it's hard for me to learn Hiragana and Katakana while Kanji seems almost hopeless.  :P I envy people who learn this kind of things fast.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on October 14, 2020, 05:06:39 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 14, 2020, 03:09:56 AM
The curse of being intelligent and educated is to becoming depressed when seeing how stupid a lot of people around you are.

And yet I know not a few intelligent and educated people who are not in the least depressed by how "stupid" a lot of people around them are. They have long since acknowledged it as a fact of nature and moved on to live their life.

.
Quote from: 71 dB on October 14, 2020, 04:11:32 AM
My life can be (and I believe it is) intellectually rich, but that's very different from being a balanced happy person.

Well, balance means balance. An emphasis on intellect alone is (one of) the very opposite(s) of balance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 14, 2020, 08:30:21 AM
     The pandemic is less seasonal than the flu and the waxing and waning of the numbers is due to behavioral factors. Politics is one, another is pandemic exhaustion, yet another is an overoptimistic assessment when the numbers go down. The last factor reminds me of the instability hypothesis of Hyman Minsky. (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 14, 2020, 11:49:21 AM
The New York Times reports that Spain, France, and the UK all reported more cases per capita than the US in the last seven days, and that the French government will impose a curfew in major cities. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 14, 2020, 01:28:53 PM
The French government has indeed imposed a night time curfew in some cities, with exceptions for night workers and others.

The UK is currently falling apart, regions are rebelling against impositions from central government, Wales is closing its borders with England, and no one, not politicians, not scientists, no one, has a clue about what to do here.

QuoteThings fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere   
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst   
Are full of passionate intensity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 14, 2020, 01:47:08 PM
Europe Overtakes U.S. in New Cases of Covid-19 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/europe-overtakes-u-s-in-new-cases-of-covid-as-restrictions-tighten-11602669748)


The West is being left behind as it squanders Covid-19 lessons from Asia-Pacific (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/12/europe/coronavirus-asia-pacific-west-intl/index.html)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 15, 2020, 08:45:02 AM
A 13-year-old girl spread the coronavirus to 11 relatives across four states this summer, despite testing negative two days before a three-week family vacation, a recent journal article released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed.

The trip occurred at an undisclosed location in June and July, and it infected family members from ages 9 to 72 who traveled to a home that was shared between five households. No masks or distancing measures were in place. The teen was exposed to an unspecified covid-19 outbreak in June before testing negative, the report says. Nasal congestion was her only symptom.

The CDC declined to say where the family members were located "out of respect for the privacy of the family who generously shared their information with investigators," but public health departments in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Georgia and Illinois were cited in the article's footnotes.

"The findings in this report highlight the need for those potentially exposed to COVID-19 to self-quarantine for 14 days after exposure or after interstate travel when mandated by state, territorial, tribal or local authorities," CDC spokesperson Scott Pauley told The Washington Post via email. "Social distancing, mask use, and hand hygiene reduce transmission in group settings and might have prevented this outbreak had they been used."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 15, 2020, 11:43:50 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 15, 2020, 08:45:02 AM

"The findings in this report highlight the need for those potentially exposed to COVID-19 to self-quarantine for 14 days after exposure or after interstate travel when mandated by state, territorial, tribal or local authorities," CDC spokesperson Scott Pauley told The Washington Post via email. "Social distancing, mask use, and hand hygiene reduce transmission in group settings and might have prevented this outbreak had they been used."

That would be a challenging one to enforce. You're feeling fit and well, there is no evidence that you are contagious. The state asks you to isolate. You may lose money as a result. How are you going to get the groceries? What if you live with others?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 02:18:08 AM
Corona death toll reached 350 in Finland.  :-X

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 16, 2020, 02:45:07 AM
So how many Finn males are left now?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 03:24:05 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 16, 2020, 02:45:07 AM
So how many Finn males are left now?

Males? Corona kills also women as far as I know. Population 5.5 million, 350 dead. Do the math...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 16, 2020, 03:33:46 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 03:24:05 AM
Males? Corona kills also women as far as I know. Population 5.5 million, 350 dead. Do the math...

Women often do better, apparently. Among all other ways women are superior to men, they seem to have a better immune system.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 03:56:21 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 16, 2020, 03:33:46 AM
Women often do better, apparently. Among all other ways women are superior to men, they seem to have a better immune system.

I found this:

So, maybe 210 or those 350 are males.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 16, 2020, 11:52:17 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 11, 2020, 07:31:22 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-11/coronavirus-can-persist-for-four-weeks-on-banknotes-study-finds

And many non-porous surfaces, esp. at lower temperatures.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wisconsin-is-battling-americas-worst-coronavirus-outbreak-and-the-states-broken-politics-is-partially-to-blame-143650745.html
More good news!  :( I'm not particularly worried about inside my house; I do try and be good though and wash hands well after venturing out to do errands.  All of the stores around here are good at supplying hand sanitizer (some, gloves too).  Any studies done on how cold effects the virus?  Or did I miss that?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 04:38:16 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 16, 2020, 11:52:17 AM
Any studies done on how cold effects the virus?  Or did I miss that?

I don't understand how this virus likes cold and dies in warm. How does it survive our body heat? Is this a stupid question?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 17, 2020, 04:53:50 AM
It does not die in warmth / summer.

The reason why airborne viruses thrive in winter is not because of the temps, but because humans spend more time together inside with the windows closed when it's cold out.

If God had any feeling for language he / she would never have allowed this thing to be called the Cold.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 17, 2020, 06:14:24 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 17, 2020, 04:53:50 AM
It does not die in warmth / summer.

The reason why airborne viruses thrive in winter is not because of the temps, but because humans spend more time together inside with the windows closed when it's cold out.

Oh, that's it? Thanks.  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 17, 2020, 06:57:54 AM
Belgian Foreign Minister Tests Positive for Coronavirus (https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2020-10-17/belgian-foreign-minister-tests-positive-for-coronavirus)

"On Oct. 12, she attended face-to-face talks with other EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 17, 2020, 09:54:54 AM
Europe Crosses 150,000 Daily Coronavirus Cases Mark, a Week After Reporting 100,000 Daily Cases (https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2020-10-17/europe-crosses-150-000-daily-coronavirus-cases-mark-a-week-after-reporting-100-000-daily-cases)

U.S. reports over 69,000 new COVID-19 cases – the most in a single day since July (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-19-united-states-69000-new-cases-most-single-day-since-july/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on October 17, 2020, 12:05:13 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 16, 2020, 04:38:16 PM
I don't understand how this virus likes cold and dies in warm. How does it survive our body heat? Is this a stupid question?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200922112304.htm

There's a lot more data on influenza virus than coronavirus, but they are probably qualitatively similar

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.0030151

Protein molecules (the virus capsid) typically need fairly specific conditions to be active (temperature, salt concentration, etc). It is a good guess that a virus that infects mammals is optimized for 37 C.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 17, 2020, 12:14:37 PM
Not at all a stupid q., Poju.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 17, 2020, 12:39:24 PM
Covid-19's first wave largely missed southern Italy. The second wave is hitting it hard.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 17, 2020, 07:39:47 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-17/treat-covid-19-early-to-save-patients-lives-sars-veteran-urges

Top Pandemic Doctor Explains Hong Kong's Low Covid-19 Fatality Rate
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on October 18, 2020, 12:23:55 AM
Here they are starting to talk about a new lockdown, even though they are desperately trying to avoid it.

Unfortunately I don't believe there are other really effective means (in democracy and freedom) to stop the virus spreading, at least for the time being, once a certain threshold of infected people has been overcome.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 18, 2020, 12:30:23 AM
Quote from: GioCar on October 18, 2020, 12:23:55 AM
Here they are starting to talk about a new lockdown, even though they are desperately trying to avoid it.

Unfortunately I don't believe there are other really effective means (in democracy and freedom) to stop the virus spreading, at least for the time being, once a certain threshold of infected people has been overcome.

IMO the issue is not solely the impact of the lockdown - that's at least something you can predict and plan for. It's how to come safely out of lockdown that's the problem, come out without people losing discipline and causing a third wave and the need for a third lockdown and so on. No one knows how to achieve that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 18, 2020, 02:15:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 18, 2020, 12:30:23 AM
IMO the issue is not solely the impact of the lockdown - that's at least something you can predict and plan for. It's how to come safely out of lockdown that's the problem, come out without people losing discipline and causing a third wave and the need for a third lockdown and so on. No one knows how to achieve that.

In a large population it can't be done.

The only thing that helps is great leadership but even then chances are some people won't do it.

For lack of a better word, our societies have become decadent.

A vaccine is the only solution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 18, 2020, 05:08:43 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 18, 2020, 02:15:32 AM
In a large population it can't be done.

The only thing that helps is great leadership but even then chances are some people won't do it.

For lack of a better word, our societies have become decadent.

A vaccine is the only solution.

I think the problem isn't decadence, it's that people can't follow rules because they can't afford to or because they don't understand them or they're not convinced they're reasonable or because they are just too difficult. 

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 18, 2020, 10:19:43 AM
A lot of people reject the rules because they want to "expres themselves".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 18, 2020, 12:30:59 PM
Etiam dii contra stultitiam frustra luctantur.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 18, 2020, 02:35:10 PM
Reported by Bloomberg News:

Gottlieb Says U.S. Strategy is Just to Wait for Vaccine (2:32 p.m. NY)

Scott Gottlieb said the Trump administration's current coronavirus strategy "is just to endure the spread until we get a vaccine."

The former FDA commissioner spoke on CBS on Sunday as total U.S. Covid cases have surpassed 8 million and many states are seeing a rising rate of infection, including more severe cases.


"There's 42 states where hospitalizations are rising. There's 45 states where the rate of transfer, the Rt is above one, meaning they have expanding epidemics," Gottlieb said.

Gottlieb said it could be February or March before the first tranche of people receive a vaccine and are actually protected from the virus. He's on the board of Pfizer, one of the companies racing to develop a vaccine and submit it to the FDA for emergency approval.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 18, 2020, 04:01:26 PM
Funny/sad (your choice) material:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-18/twitter-deletes-trump-health-adviser-s-claim-masks-don-t-work

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 18, 2020, 05:05:52 PM
All them what have an appetite for Trump® Disinformation
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 18, 2020, 07:44:52 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 18, 2020, 04:01:26 PM
Funny/sad (your choice) material:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-18/twitter-deletes-trump-health-adviser-s-claim-masks-don-t-work

well...

(https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/masks.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 18, 2020, 08:35:25 PM
Quote from: Herman on October 18, 2020, 10:19:43 AM
A lot of people reject the rules because they want to "expres themselves".

Well maybe, it's hard to know. I just think that it would greatly help here in the UK if people knew they wouldn't be too much out of pocket by self isolating, especially if they're asymptomatic, and if they knew that there was a way they could get the groceries in, and if they were offered alternative accommodation if where they live is really cramped. In short, if the state actually supported them rather than directed them. This is, after all, 14 days house arrest, it's a huge imposition.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on October 18, 2020, 09:55:44 PM
I notice something, sometime we associated poverty whit illness virus spreading, but something not right here...

My neighborhood use to be cheap to live, than  the mayor of district  try to sold thee country to rich family in, these people  respect us F  word  us all, there  parasite and dangerous for us local.

They were the first to believe lettuce of collective immunity which is now false...  >:D

Just in the backstreet of my avenue four rich  young  between  35-45 move in, these people started a regime of occupation party  of 15-20+ people and there four place like this behind my house, there students or students graduate have children yet do adult party gathering  from  thusday  until sunday, do so much racket,  my aunt live on the same street she have a cancer she could not sleep , we would heard these idiot noise from 10 block away no police came, eventually i started to  take picture  of there little gathering  they stop, but you know what shock me drive me mad.

Inequity, the local have less power than these new neighbors invader, less right, my aunt complaint to the police they were making noise so loud  4 days a week until 2-3 a.m police  would backfire at her home and they would complaint in horde saying my aunt harassed them, these slime these vermin, they inoculated us of covid-19, not poor ''stupid'' people but rich idiot...

Now because of me checking these  a** h****(pardon my language they stop there partying I took picture of them like hey smile  your caught on tape lol

:laugh:

This intervention was to tell you folks the reality of it all, it's not just poor people spreading covid-19 some are vigilant like me, I'm not rich, yet rich  people of my neighborhood invaders mole of Plateau Montreal are way much worst, I spurt a mask on the street, gentrification made my neighborhood Rosemont  sensitive case since the rich  student coming here to raise there family are party people and don't care of local of us and spread covid-19.

This anger me, you don't know, beyond words (like Gira in Swans in 1984 nyc band). I'm sorry but this is the way it is...

My point is  sometime rich people or less responsable than poor people  in a crisis like covid-19...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 19, 2020, 04:16:34 AM
Quote from: deprofundis on October 18, 2020, 09:55:44 PM

My point is  sometime rich people or less responsable than poor people  in a crisis like covid-19...

Certainly. Think of the orange pretender (claiming to be very rich), who may be the most irresponsible person on earth in this context.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 19, 2020, 09:16:11 AM
Quote from: deprofundis on October 18, 2020, 09:55:44 PM

My point is  sometime rich people or less responsable than poor people  in a crisis like covid-19...

Sometimes... Poor people generally feel vulnerable, and rich people often feel invincible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on October 19, 2020, 11:18:17 AM
Quote from: Que on October 19, 2020, 09:16:11 AM
Sometimes... Poor people generally feel vulnerable, and rich people often feel invincible.
For real... I used to have to drive down a long country road to school twice a week where people would drive like maniacs, leading to some stuff I'd like to forget I've seen.

The reputation of that road is that it's just rich assholes causing these crashes. And my professor wouldn't let me do the class at home when it felt like I was putting my life in danger every time, so there wasn't really a choice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 19, 2020, 11:18:43 AM
Poor people rightly feel vulnerable because European governments will surely make them bear the lions share of the costs of the crisis, the poor will pay. And of course poor people rightly feel vulnerable because they live in more cramped conditions, and their health is poorer, and they tend to have low paid public facing jobs, so they're more likely to catch the disease - we've seen that in the stats for the first wave in the UK, where Blacks, Asians and ethnic minorities were disproportionately affected.

Are the rich right to feel invincible? Well in the UK they know that the government will do all it possibly can to protect their investment in property, while doing very little to protect the young against structural unemployment caused by the crisis. In that sense, they have a bit of a security blanket.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on October 19, 2020, 07:31:40 PM
If Hillary Clinton was president and 50,000 people had died the Republicans would have impeached her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 19, 2020, 07:34:40 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on October 19, 2020, 07:31:40 PM
If Hillary Clinton was president and 50,000 people had died the Republicans would have impeached her.

watch your language, please.
you mean 'locked her up.'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 20, 2020, 05:20:44 AM
From Bloomberg News:

Roche CEO Warns Against Hopes for Speedy Vaccines (7:51 a.m. NY)

Many people's hopes for a speedy vaccine are still too high, Roche Holding AG Chief Executive Officer Severin Schwan warned.

It is "completely unrealistic" to expect a Covid-19 vaccine to be widely available by the end of this year, and most people probably won't have access to a shot until the second half of 2021, Schwan said in an interview with Bloomberg TV anchor Francine Lacqua.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2020, 05:28:40 AM
Can't tell that to the "magic & pixie dust" president.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 20, 2020, 05:33:18 AM
More news items (CNBC):

Gottlieb: U.S. is about a week away from a rapid Covid-19 case spike


Former FDA chief Dr. Scott Gottlieb is warning that the U.S. is about "a week away from seeing a rapid acceleration" in coronavirus cases.

Without a backstop from widely available treatments, Gottlieb said Monday evening on CNBC's "The News with Shepard Smith," "the fall and winter season is when this coronavirus is going to want to spread."

"We can look to happier days, but these are going to be some tough months ahead," he cautioned.

Echoing similar comments from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, Gottlieb said the holiday season and family gatherings are especially precarious for the spread of coronavirus because that's when people let their guard down.


Covid-19 likely to become as 'endemic' as annual flu virus

Covid-19 is likely to become as "endemic" as the annual flu virus, the U.K.'s chief scientific advisor said.

"We can't be certain, but I think it's unlikely we will end up with a truly sterilizing vaccine, (that is) something that completely stops infection, and it's likely this disease will circulate and be endemic, that's my best assessment," Patrick Vallance told the National Security Strategy Committee in London on Monday.

"Clearly as management becomes better, as you get vaccination which would decrease the chance of infection and the severity of disease ... this then starts to look more like annual flu than anything else and that may be the direction we end up going," he said.

A vaccine against the new coronavirus — and there are a handful in Phase 3 clinical trials, according to the World Health Organization — is not likely to eradicate the virus anyway, Vallance added.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2020, 05:50:44 AM
Alas! Perfectly sound (as it were)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 20, 2020, 10:02:18 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 20, 2020, 05:28:40 AM
Can't tell that to the "magic & pixie dust" president.

Hopefully he'll be irrelevant soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2020, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: Herman on October 20, 2020, 10:02:18 AM
Hopefully he'll be irrelevant soon.


Amen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2020, 03:38:55 PM
We saved our economy in Sweden. But too many people died. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/10/20/sweden-economy-pandemic-strategy/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 20, 2020, 07:24:50 PM
I often feel that the Orange Swindler's coronavirus "policy" is governed by "WWJD", or "What would Jair do?"

But not in this case...  :laugh:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-54619730

Covid: China's Sinovac vaccine to be included in Brazil immunisation plan

Brazil plans to use a Chinese-made coronavirus vaccine as part of a national immunisation programme, officials have announced.

São Paulo Governor João Doria said the federal government had agreed to buy 46 million doses of the vaccine CoronaVac.

He said the immunisation programme could begin as soon as January 2021, making it one of the first such efforts in the world to fight the pandemic.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 21, 2020, 05:38:24 AM
Not the best of situations here either, the number of daily infections reaching the busiest days earlier in the year. On the positive side, only few fatalities, and less than 2% of intensive care units occupied. Experts say that due to the general development, all travel abroad, everywhere, might be warned against in just a couple of days from now ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 21, 2020, 07:30:32 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 20, 2020, 07:24:50 PM
I often feel that the Orange Swindler's coronavirus "policy" is governed by "WWJD", or "What would Jair do?"

But not in this case...  :laugh:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-54619730

Covid: China's Sinovac vaccine to be included in Brazil immunisation plan

Brazil plans to use a Chinese-made coronavirus vaccine as part of a national immunisation programme, officials have announced.

São Paulo Governor João Doria said the federal government had agreed to buy 46 million doses of the vaccine CoronaVac.

He said the immunisation programme could begin as soon as January 2021, making it one of the first such efforts in the world to fight the pandemic.


WWJD -2- the plot thickens

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-21/bolsonaro-slams-chinese-vaccine-his-government-said-it-would-buy

Bolsonaro Slams Chinese Vaccine His Government Said It Would Buy
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 21, 2020, 02:00:06 PM
Coronavirus Now: Boston public schools suspend in-person learning for all students
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 22, 2020, 11:07:57 AM
This is slightly scary:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/22/cdc-updates-definition-of-close-contact-to-someone-with-coronavirus.html

Even more scary when you consider it's from the Orange Pustule - tainted CDC and thus likely an optimistic spin.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 22, 2020, 04:49:45 PM
Mass. coronavirus case numbers jump to 986 with 30 deaths; 77 communities now designated high risk
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 22, 2020, 05:00:20 PM
For the first time since late July, the United States on Thursday topped 73,000 new coronavirus infections — the third-highest daily count since the pandemic began.

Seven states — including Indiana, Ohio and Oklahoma — reported record case counts Thursday as the virus has continued to surge in the Midwest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 22, 2020, 06:22:19 PM
Europe Daily Coronavirus Cases Double in 10 Days, Reports 200,000 Daily Cases for the First Time (https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2020-10-22/europe-daily-coronavirus-cases-double-in-10-days-reports-200-000-daily-cases-for-the-first-time)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 23, 2020, 11:13:02 AM
In my country, they're now trying to stop the begun worsening by implementing new restrictions, but the new measures are relatively moderate - masks in all public indoor areas, no selling of alcohol after 10pm (where all eating out establishments already must close), everybody recommended to a maximum social contact group of 10 people besides work, and no meetings of more than 10 people. This combined with other measures in existence.

Of more general interest perhaps: it was said today by the authorities, that 95% of registered fatalities (approaching 700 now, of 5.6 mio) are the direct result of the virus itself.

Also, a survey seems to indicate that the fewer female fatalities are probably the result of them taking the precautions and the virus more seriously - not something coming from their bodies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 23, 2020, 02:49:48 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/w5Dqn60.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 23, 2020, 04:31:39 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/23/dr-scott-gottlieb-warns-of-staggering-covid-death-totals-in-us.html

https://news.yahoo.com/half-million-deaths-end-february-150017409.html

Meanwhile it's business as usual for Cheeto Mussolini:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-23/trump-ramps-up-rallies-bucking-health-guidelines-as-virus-rages

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-23/trump-hasn-t-met-with-virus-task-force-in-months-fauci-says

It's been "several months" since President Donald Trump met with the White House coronavirus task force, said Anthony Fauci, the top U.S. infectious disease expert, who's faced repeated criticism from the president.

Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told MSNBC on Friday that the task force now meets about once a week, versus its daily gatherings early in the pandemic. The team also holds a regular call with governors, and its medical experts meet virtually as well, Fauci said.

But Fauci said it had been "a while" since he'd spoken with Trump directly about Covid strategy, and that the president is instead relying on the advice of Scott Atlas, who has expressed skepticism about the benefit of wearing masks, urged the reopening of the country, and said it's preferable for young, healthy people to be exposed to the virus.




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 24, 2020, 03:26:36 AM
And the news from the US is not uplifting either...


Coronavirus: US cases reach record high amid new wave of infections (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54670386) (BBC)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 24, 2020, 05:38:06 AM
Quote from: Que on October 24, 2020, 02:04:24 AM
It is clear that Europe has a big problem....

An assessment in a free article in the Financial Times:

Europe battles to contain surge in Covid-19 cases (https://www.ft.com/content/bcddc297-b7f2-444d-908f-54e8ce6f4f98)

Q

But from July.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 24, 2020, 07:54:11 AM
Europe becomes second region to cross 250,000 deaths as second COVID wave hits (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-casualties/europe-becomes-second-region-to-cross-250000-deaths-as-second-covid-wave-hits-idUSKBN2790FO)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 24, 2020, 08:18:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 24, 2020, 05:38:06 AM
But from July.

My bad! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 24, 2020, 08:20:41 AM
Quote from: Todd on October 24, 2020, 07:54:11 AM
Europe becomes second region to cross 250,000 deaths as second COVID wave hits (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-casualties/europe-becomes-second-region-to-cross-250000-deaths-as-second-covid-wave-hits-idUSKBN2790FO)

Unfortunately the overall Covid-19 situation hasn't been good in Europe. 353 (0.14 %) of these 250 000 deaths come from Finland.

The US can be expected to join the 250 000 club in 3-4 weeks (between November 14 and 21) I would estimate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 24, 2020, 08:52:33 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 24, 2020, 08:20:41 AM
Unfortunately the overall Covid-19 situation hasn't been good in Europe. 353 (0.14 %) of these 250 000 deaths come from Finland.

The US can be expected to join the 250 000 club in 3-4 weeks (between November 14 and 21) I would estimate.

If one looks at "excess deaths" and the percentage thereof attributed to COVID-19 (broken out by Euro nations and US states), it's clear that the US (aggregated) has been systematically understating COVID deaths. Surprise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 24, 2020, 10:41:21 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 24, 2020, 08:52:33 AM
If one looks at "excess deaths" and the percentage thereof attributed to COVID-19 (broken out by Euro nations and US states), it's clear that the US (aggregated) has been systematically understating COVID deaths. Surprise.

Courtesy of the Ministry of Disinformation
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 24, 2020, 08:32:37 PM
More superspreading:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/24/pence-chief-of-staff-senior-political-adviser-both-test-positive-for-covid-19.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 25, 2020, 05:24:49 AM
Europe sounds alarm over second wave of Covid infections as WHO warns of 'exponential' rise (https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20201024-europe-sounds-alarm-over-second-wave-of-covid-infections-as-who-warns-of-exponential-rise)


Quote from: France 24The agency said all EU countries except Cyprus, Estonia, Finland and Greece fell into a "serious concern" category, as did the United Kingdom, up from just seven a month ago.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 25, 2020, 07:46:06 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/25/coronavirus-mark-meadows-says-were-not-going-to-control-the-pandemic-.html

Cheeto Mussolini's "strategy": Fuck you, Jack, I got mine. I'm IMMUNE!

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said on Sunday that the U.S. will not get control of the coronavirus pandemic as the country reports a record high in new daily Covid-19 cases.

"We're not going to control the pandemic," Meadows said during an interview on CNN. "We are going to control the fact that we get vaccines, therapeutics and other mitigations."

Pressed on why the U.S. can't make efforts to control the pandemic, Meadows said: "Because it is a contagious virus just like the flu."
...
The U.S. reported 83,757 new Covid-19 cases on Friday, surpassing a previous daily record of about 77,300 cases in mid-July, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. On Saturday, the country reported another 83,718 new cases.

As the country enters into what could be a dangerous winter, research indicates that the U.S. could see more than 500,000 total deaths by the end of February if states continue to ease pandemic restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 25, 2020, 08:06:31 AM
More from Superspreader Central HQ:

Mike Pence will not quarantine after four aides test positive for coronavirus

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/25/mike-pence-coronavirus-four-aides-test-positive-for-covid-19.html

(Updated story)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 25, 2020, 08:24:23 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/25/toxic-cdc-staffers-say-morale-inside-the-public-health-agency-has-plummeted-during-the-pandemic.html

Months of mixed messages, political pressure and public gaffes about COVID-19 have caused morale at the Centers for Disease Control to turn "toxic," say four current and two former CDC staffers, with one saying the election could be a "tipping point" for a mass exodus if President Donald Trump wins.

"The house is not only on fire," said a veteran CDC staffer who did not want to be named for fear of retribution. "We're standing in ashes."

Current and former CDC employees tell NBC News that career staffers are still struggling to influence key decisions on the pandemic as new daily COVID cases soar nationwide, but are overruled by Trump appointees when politics intrudes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 26, 2020, 07:06:56 AM
Cheeto Mussolini  COVID horseshit of the day (so far, it's early yet):

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/26/coronavirus-trump-claims-the-worsening-us-outbreak-is-a-fake-news-media-conspiracy-even-as-hospitalizations-rise.html

President Donald Trump on Monday claimed the worsening coronavirus outbreak in the United States is a "Fake News Media Conspiracy," saying the nation only has the most cases in the world because "we TEST, TEST, TEST."

"Corrupt Media conspiracy at all time high," Trump said in a tweet Monday morning. "On November 4th., topic will totally change," he added, referring to the day after the presidential election.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2020, 01:47:01 PM
Not encouraging to read: Source of infections unknown in half of Mass. cases
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 27, 2020, 01:30:02 AM
- Another big study of 365,000 people in the UK severely hits herd immunity ideas
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-herd-immunity-hopes-dashed-as-study-shows-covid-19-antibodies-fall-rapidly-after-recovery-12115510?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter

- Several reports on quite effective vaccines being introduced within just a matter of weeks, such as to UK NHS health service staff, even in early December
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccine-nhs-staff-england-oxford-b1295880.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 27, 2020, 10:05:11 AM
TORONTO — As the holiday season approaches amid a surge in novel coronavirus cases across the country, a Thanksgiving-related spike in Canada may serve as a cautionary tale for the United States.
"Case counts in much of Canada are climbing, even in parts of the country that imposed new autumn restrictions. Canadians celebrate Thanksgiving on the second Monday of October, and both provincial and federal officials have pointed to the holiday as a culprit.

"In some areas we are learning that gathering during the Thanksgiving weekend contributed to the elevated case counts we are seeing today," Howard Njoo, Canada's deputy chief public health officer, told reporters Tuesday in Ottawa. "Our actions matter."

Before the holiday, officials advised Canadians to curtail their plans by limiting celebrations to those living under the same roof or moving the party online, but it is not clear how widely the advice was heeded."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: flyingdutchman on October 27, 2020, 10:41:36 AM
Herd immunity is the dumbest idea this side of the GOP casting their lot with Dump.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 27, 2020, 02:26:41 PM

     Why You Shouldn't Worry About Studies Showing Waning Coronavirus Antibodies (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/health/coronavirus-antibodies-studies.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage&section=Health)

Over the three-month period, the proportion of people with detectable antibodies in their blood dropped to 4.8 percent from 6 percent, the researchers reported. The smallest decline was among people ages 18 to 24 and the biggest in those over age 75.

Looking at the data a different way, about 73 percent of people who had antibodies early on still produced a positive result months later, noted Dr. Antonio Bertoletti, a virologist at Duke NUS Medical School in Singapore. "That's not such a dramatic decline."

Antibodies also represent only one arm of the immune response, albeit the one that can most easily be measured. There are at least three other branches of the immune system that can fend off illness, so antibody levels don't present the full picture.

"It's not the whole immune response," said Dr. Paul Elliott, an epidemiologist at Imperial College London who heads the project.

When the body encounters a pathogen, it rapidly produces antibodies that recognize the invader. Once the acute infection resolves, the levels decline — as they must for purely practical reasons.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 27, 2020, 04:56:38 PM
Protesters clash with police in northern Italy as anger mounts over Covid-19 restrictions (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/27/europe/italy-coronavirus-protests-intl/index.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on October 27, 2020, 07:24:33 PM
"I give you a new commandment"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 28, 2020, 05:45:24 AM
Quote from: JBS on October 27, 2020, 07:24:33 PM
"I give you a new commandment"

Brilliant !!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BWV 1080 on October 28, 2020, 06:23:51 AM
16% test positivity rate for South Dakota, ground zero for Red-team stupidity

https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/map/south-dakota (https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/map/south-dakota)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 28, 2020, 08:15:58 AM
Quote from: BWV 1080 on October 28, 2020, 06:23:51 AM
16% test positivity rate for South Dakota, ground zero for Red-team stupidity

https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/map/south-dakota (https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/map/south-dakota)

Stupidity kills.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 29, 2020, 07:20:45 AM
- All travel anywhere abroad now warned against by our Danish government. Situation was worsening but has been a bit more stable for about 3-4 days now, following further restrictions. In late summer, we were down at 20-30 daily cases, recently it has become 750-1050. But the number of tests is also much bigger, and treatment works better, with shorter hospitalization periods, on average 3 days and fewer fatalities.
- tough days in France where there is a very thorough lock down starting today, combined with a series of terror attacks from Islamist radicals
- Sweden sees worsening and strengthens restrictions, warning against participating in public life in general
- South Korea and Taiwan some of the few countries experiencing continued success in fighting the virus, partly due to strict surveillance systems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 29, 2020, 10:22:58 AM
From Bloomberg News:

New Projection Shows Higher U.S. Death Toll (11:59 a.m. NY)
The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, an influential modeling group, is projecting a higher U.S. death toll amid a surge in virus cases and hospitalizations. The group now projects about 405,000 Covid-19 deaths by Feb. 1, representing a nearly 20,000 increase from a previous projection of about 386,000 deaths.

"Europe is seeing a surge right now and Europe is ahead about a month from the United States. So basically we are watching what would unfold here in the United States," Ali Mokdad, a professor of health metrics sciences with IHME, said Thursday morning in a briefing held by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The full data are set to be released later Thursday, he said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 29, 2020, 10:41:53 AM
It was what it was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 29, 2020, 11:07:02 AM
Won't stop Cheeto Mussolini from saying he did a good job...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/29/trump-administration-vetted-political-views-of-274-celebrities-for-botched-covid-ad-campaign.html

The Trump administration vetted 274 celebrities for their political views as part of a $265 million public service campaign on the coronavirus, House lawmakers said.
The ad campaign was designed to advance Trump's "partisan political agenda" ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election, according to the joint inquiry by three key House panels.
The new documents indicate that HHS officials may have violated federal contracting law, the lawmakers said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 29, 2020, 01:53:01 PM
"Amid a surge of coronavirus cases in Massachusetts, new state data indicate that dozens of clusters in the past month have been identified in child care settings, nursing homes, senior living centers, restaurants and food courts, and from organized athletic activities.

Yet many of these clusters — identified as two or more confirmed cases with a common exposure — resulted in a relatively small percentage of the roughly 20,000 new confirmed cases for that period.

By far the largest number of clusters counted by Massachusetts are from households, defined as a shared residence of people who are not identified with another cluster. And contact tracers were not necessarily able to learn whether those infections were linked to workplaces, social gatherings or other activities."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 29, 2020, 03:26:25 PM
Garry Kasparov: "I you keep saying you're turning the corner, that means you're going in circles."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 30, 2020, 05:13:47 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 25, 2020, 08:06:31 AM
More from Superspreader Central HQ:

Mike Pence will not quarantine after four aides test positive for coronavirus

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/25/mike-pence-coronavirus-four-aides-test-positive-for-covid-19.html


That's not good.

We need Pence to be on hand in November, should Trump want to cut and run.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 30, 2020, 05:35:51 AM
Over 90,000 new cases yesterday? Death counts on the way up again? Counties hosting Trump rallies develop significantly higher case rates versus surrounding counties and state averages? Sigh.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 30, 2020, 07:18:40 AM
Europe struggling with 2nd surge of COVID-19 case, and it may be worse than the 1st

The continent now accounts for 46% of global coronavirus cases. (https://abcnews.go.com/International/europe-struggling-2nd-surge-covid-19-case-worse/story?id=73880488)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 30, 2020, 03:08:28 PM
     A Flu Shot Might Reduce Coronavirus Infections, Early Research Suggests (https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:RRP1kR42EWoJ:https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-flu-shot-might-reduce-coronavirus-infections-early-research-suggests/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1-d)

In the new study, Mihai Netea, an infectious disease immunologist at Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands, and his colleagues combed through their hospital's databases to see if employees who got a flu shot during the 2019–2020 season were more or less likely to get infected by SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Workers who received a flu vaccine, the researchers found, were 39 percent less likely to test positive for the coronavirus as of June 1, 2020. While 2.23 percent of nonvaccinated employees tested positive, only 1.33 percent of vaccinated ones did. Netea and his team posted their findings on the preprint server MedRxiv on October 16.

     I got my flu shot in September. The advice was to get it early this year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on October 30, 2020, 04:28:34 PM
Looks like we're closing in on 100,000 new cases and 1,000 deaths today in the U.S.

I plan to get a flu shot next week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 30, 2020, 06:17:55 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on October 30, 2020, 04:28:34 PM
...

I plan to get a flu shot next week.

Me too. Read an item a while back in which Dr. Fauci recommended that people in my age group (I just turned 63) wait until late October to get the flu shot. As usual I'll be late.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 30, 2020, 06:23:39 PM
I had mine this week, it's grrreat!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on October 31, 2020, 12:19:25 AM
I had my first ever flu vaccination this year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 31, 2020, 05:57:39 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 30, 2020, 06:17:55 PM
Me too. Read an item a while back in which Dr. Fauci recommended that people in my age group (I just turned 63) wait until late October to get the flu shot. As usual I'll be late.

Did he give a reason? The only reason I can think of is that supplies of the high-dose vaccine might not become available until then. But I'm not certain whether it's recommended if you're under 65. I'm 65 and was told for the first time that I should get the high-dose formulation, and received it at work earlier this month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 31, 2020, 06:28:27 AM
Quote from: krummholz on October 31, 2020, 05:57:39 AM
Did he give a reason? The only reason I can think of is that supplies of the high-dose vaccine might not become available until then. But I'm not certain whether it's recommended if you're under 65. I'm 65 and was told for the first time that I should get the high-dose formulation, and received it at work earlier this month.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/16/when-dr-anthony-fauci-gets-his-flu-shot-and-why.html

So you're more likely to have immunity in peak times of Feb. and Mar. But he wasn't specific about age recommendations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 31, 2020, 06:31:04 AM
Cheeto Mussolini big lie of the day (so far):

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-30/trump-claims-at-rally-doctors-lie-about-virus-deaths-for-money

President Donald Trump claimed without substantiation that U.S. doctors are lying about the number of Americans who've died from Covid-19, saying they inflate the figure because they are paid more money for deaths attributed to the virus.

There's no evidence for the president's assertion, and physician groups have castigated him for maligning their profession.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 31, 2020, 06:46:33 AM
it's not so much the insult that's bad; it's the nth instance of Trump wanting people to trust him over people who know what they're talking about.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 31, 2020, 09:04:24 AM
No surprise, Dept.: Stanford study estimates that 18 crowded Trump rallies ultimately resulted in 30,000 coronavirus cases
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 31, 2020, 05:15:13 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 31, 2020, 09:04:24 AM
No surprise, Dept.: Stanford study estimates that 18 crowded Trump rallies ultimately resulted in 30,000 coronavirus cases

If true that's about double all coronavirus cases in Finland (16,113 as of writing this).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 05:57:53 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-01/white-house-slams-fauci-after-recent-comments-on-pandemic
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 01, 2020, 06:49:06 AM
]
Quote from: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 05:57:53 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-01/white-house-slams-fauci-after-recent-comments-on-pandemic

QuoteDeere said Fauci was "choosing to criticize the president in the media and make his political leanings known by praising the president's opponent — exactly what the American people have come to expect from The Swamp."

What is The Swamp?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 07:06:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 01, 2020, 06:49:06 AM
]
What is The Swamp?

Not au courant with GOP-speak, but I think "The Swamp", which Cheeto Mussolini promised in 2016 to drain, refers to the entrenched Washington bureaucracy (not clear to me whether that includes lobbyists, since I doubt the GOP dislikes them  ;) ). In Cheeto-speak, this often has morphed into the "Deep State", meaning the elements of said Swamp that are (via conspiracy, of course) working against him. I'm surprised Atlas didn't invoke "Deep State".

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 07:13:30 AM
This item (from CNBC) is bizarre. Atlas on Russian TV?

White House advisor Scott Atlas goes on Russia-controlled TV to criticize "lockdowns"

White House health advisor Dr. Scott Atlas appeared on Russia's state-controlled television channel, RT, on Saturday and downplayed concerns about the pandemic.

Atlas said that the "lockdowns," which he defined as including the process of testing asymptomatic individuals and isolating positive tests and quarantining possible cases, were "killing people." He also said he was "proud to be an outlier," responding to a comment from Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Atlas has become a controversial figure during the pandemic, with former colleagues from Stanford criticizing him in an open letter and Twitter deleting a post of his about masks for being "misleading."

NBC News reported in September that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield said of Atlas that "everything he says is false."

The Kremlin-backed RT is also viewed suspiciously by many amid concerns about foreign election interference. U.S. intelligence officials said in a 2017 report that RT "seeks to influence politics, fuel discontent in US."

— Jesse Pound
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 01, 2020, 08:05:29 AM
'A whole lot of hurt': Fauci warns of covid-19 surge, offers blunt assessment of Trump's response (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fauci-covid-winter-forecast/2020/10/31/e3970eb0-1b8b-11eb-bb35-2dcfdab0a345_story.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 08:36:43 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-01/u-k-increased-covid-s-spread-by-subsidizing-diners-study-finds

The U.K.'s Eat-Out-to-Help-Out program, hailed as an economic cure for its ailing restaurant industry, may have substantially worsened the pandemic, research showed.

The government spent 500 million pounds ($647 million) subsidizing the cost of restaurant meals and non-alcoholic drinks by as much as 50% in August, even after evidence had emerged that Covid-19 could easily spread in hospitality settings, a study from the University of Warwick found.

The program succeeded in filling tables and getting cash into the hands of hospitality businesses, but may be responsible for 8% to 17% of all U.K. coronavirus cases during the summer, as well as asymptomatic infections that may have helped drive an explosive second wave of the pandemic, said Thiemo Fetzer, an associate professor of economics and a visiting fellow at the London School of Economics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 10:48:57 AM
From Bloomberg News:

Trump to Host Party at White House on Election Night (1:59 pm.)
Trump intends to throw an election night party in the East Room of the White House, and his advisers have discussed inviting around 400 people to attend, according to a person familiar with the plans.


The president's team initially wanted to host an event at the nearby Trump International Hotel, but city rules capping indoor gatherings at 50 people due to the coronavirus pandemic foiled that plans.

The alternative, a large White House party, was reported earlier by the New York Times.

The event raises concerns about another potential virus outbreak at the White House. Health experts, including leading U.S. infectious disease specialist Anthony Fauci, said a Sept. 26 ceremony for Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett was a super-spreader event. The event was held outdoors but attendees also mingled inside the White House. Several were later infected, including the president and first lady. It's not clear, however, how the first couple contracted the virus.

The White House didn't comment. Spokespeople for the Trump campaign didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. -- Mario Parker
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 01, 2020, 11:01:25 AM
While Maine has performed well with a small total amount of cases versus the rest of the country, there has been a serious uptick in cases the past week. Nearly triple previous daily averages.  While 103 daily cases Friday is very small, it is the largest of the pandemic.  Outstanding cases are at a peak level also.  The governor is reconsidering the reopening of bars scheduled for Nov. 2 and tightening restrictions on large gatherings.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 01, 2020, 11:16:21 AM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 01, 2020, 11:01:25 AM
While Maine has performed well with a small total amount of cases versus the rest of the country, there has been a serious uptick in cases the past week. Nearly triple previous daily averages.  While 103 daily cases Friday is very small, it is the largest of the pandemic.  Outstanding cases are at a peak level also.  The governor is reconsidering the reopening of bars scheduled for Nov. 2 and tightening restrictions on large gatherings.

Stay safe, Tom!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 01, 2020, 11:19:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 01, 2020, 11:16:21 AM
Stay safe, Tom!
Thanks Karl! You as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 01, 2020, 11:43:11 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-01/trump-adviser-atlas-apologizes-over-interview-to-russian-agency

One of President Donald Trump's top medical advisers issued an apology on Sunday for giving an interview to a Russian news agency that's registered as a foreign agent in the U.S.


Scott Atlas, a physician and one-time Fox commentator who rose to the president's inner circle after repeatedly downplaying the risk of the coronavirus, issued an apology Sunday, in particular to U.S. national security officials.


In the interview with RT, formerly known as Russia Today, Atlas was deeply critical of lockdown measures and also criticized U.S. media for its portrayal of the pandemic.

"The lockdowns will go down as an epic failure of public policy," he told the Russian agency. U.S. public health officials are "killing people with their fear-inducing shutdown policies."


Atlas also said that deaths in Asia are lower than the U.S. not because of public health measures, but because of what he termed higher existing immunity in countries like South Korea to the novel coronavirus because of previous viruses in the region.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 01, 2020, 04:41:57 PM
Look, Mitya! Another useful idiot!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: flyingdutchman on November 01, 2020, 11:13:08 PM
And now Trump (Dump) tells us he'll fire Fauci.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 02, 2020, 04:27:09 PM
The number of confirmed coronavirus cases in Massachusetts rose by 725 on Monday, the Department of Public Health reported.

Monday's daily figure was below 1,000 for the first time in more than a week. The latest case tally brings the state total to 156,385, the state reported.

The death toll from confirmed cases rose by nine to 9,797.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 03, 2020, 12:40:26 AM
Lockdown No.2 here on Thursday. However, this time the schools will remain open, so I should avoid having to teach my classes 'online' whilst my wife accidentally locks herself in the bathroom and screams 'LET ME OUT OF HERE' whilst I try to teach them about Life in Victorian Britain.

On a separate note I will be thinking of you lot in the USA today and hoping that things will pass off peacefully.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 03, 2020, 05:57:43 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 03, 2020, 12:40:26 AM
Lockdown No.2 here on Thursday. However, this time the schools will remain open, so I should avoid having to teach my classes 'online' whilst my wife accidentally locks herself in the bathroom and screams 'LET ME OUT OF HERE' whilst I try to teach them about Life in Victorian Britain.

On a separate note I will be thinking of you lot in the USA today and hoping that things will pass off peacefully.

Stay safe, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 03, 2020, 07:14:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 03, 2020, 05:57:43 AM
Stay safe, Jeffrey!

Thank you Karl!
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 04, 2020, 05:13:03 AM
Denmark is the World's largest producer of mink furs, and it's now been decided to euthanize the complete stock consisting of millions, in order to avoid virus mutations among them, that could also endanger future vaccine efficiency. There's a production of almost 18 mio furs per year, but it's under conditions that can't be described as animal-friendly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 04, 2020, 05:14:09 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/04/north-dakota-man-who-died-of-covid-19-wins-seat-in-state-legislature.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:04:44 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 03, 2020, 12:40:26 AM
Lockdown No.2 here on Thursday. However, this time the schools will remain open, so I should avoid having to teach my classes 'online' whilst my wife accidentally locks herself in the bathroom and screams 'LET ME OUT OF HERE' whilst I try to teach them about Life in Victorian Britain.

On a separate note I will be thinking of you lot in the USA today and hoping that things will pass off peacefully.
Take care Jeffrey!

Well, hopefully we will know the results in a few days?  Maybe longer?  And who knows whether or not there will be challenges in court?  Finger's crossed here--for peace in particular and trying to find a way to come together again as a country.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:11:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 04, 2020, 05:13:03 AM
Denmark is the World's largest producer of mink furs, and it's now been decided to euthanize the complete stock consisting of millions, in order to avoid virus mutations among them, that could also endanger future vaccine efficiency. There's a production of almost 18 mio furs per year, but it's under conditions that can't be described as animal-friendly.
Oh my God!  ???  1) I hadn't realized that they were so susceptible to the virus and 2) Couldn't they release them some how or another?  Or figure out something else?  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 04, 2020, 07:46:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 04, 2020, 05:14:09 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/04/north-dakota-man-who-died-of-covid-19-wins-seat-in-state-legislature.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/04/north-dakota-man-who-died-of-covid-19-wins-seat-in-state-legislature.html)

Curiously perfect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on November 04, 2020, 07:48:19 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:11:09 AM
Oh my God!  ???  1) I hadn't realized that they were so susceptible to the virus and 2) Couldn't they release them some how or another?  Or figure out something else?  :(

PD

12 people got infected by them already. I don't think letting the little buggers free would be a good idea... :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on November 04, 2020, 07:58:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:11:09 AM
Oh my God!  ???  1) I hadn't realized that they were so susceptible to the virus and 2) Couldn't they release them some how or another?  Or figure out something else?  :(
PD
The Netherlands and Belgium are struggling with the same problem: all mink farms will be closed, all the animals must be destroyed. Apparently the minks can contaminate humans, so there is no other way.
Anyway, these animals are bred in truly horrific conditions - even in Denmark, Belgium and The Netherlands (and the US).
(see YT - if you want....)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 04, 2020, 08:02:25 AM
Quote from: André on November 04, 2020, 07:48:19 AM
12 people got infected by them already. I don't think letting the little buggers free would be a good idea... :o

The situation is now considered so serious, that the Danish government tomorrow will introduce more restrictions in Northern Jutland, where this is taking place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 04, 2020, 08:08:44 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:11:09 AM
Oh my God!  ???  1) I hadn't realized that they were so susceptible to the virus and 2) Couldn't they release them some how or another?  Or figure out something else?  :(

PD

  Release wouldn't work with that amount of animals and the already found viruses. Unfortunately transfer of virus from mink (where investigations have shown that the animals got the virus from a seagull's feet) to humans and then from humans back to mink, and between humans, involving several new virus mutations, and 12 people or more getting tested positive - but not sick - from mink (these people have now been isolated, and the geographical areas face further lock-downs) has been identified. This could affect the efficiency of future vaccines in particular. In reality it might mean the closure of Danish mink business, consisting 0.7 % of the country's export, since the refined breeding animals will be culled too. But the entrepreneurs have accepted it due to protecting public, potentially global, health. They might-might try to work to isolate a few particularly good breeding animals in some locked facility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 04, 2020, 08:30:12 AM
It has only been suggested - and not proven, that the seagulls are the transmitting factor, since so far virus only has been found on one seagull's foot.

One of the mink-mutated vira (cluster 5) is particularly dangerous, since it in vitro very recently has been shown to react less well to virus antibodies, and it has already been transmitted to some humans in Northern Jutland. It has been estimated, that 5% of the infected persons in Northern Jutland carries it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 04, 2020, 02:28:04 PM

     The US reached 100,000 cases today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 04, 2020, 03:53:03 PM
361 corona deaths in Finland now...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 05, 2020, 08:58:19 AM
The mink story, resulting in the culling of 1100 local mink farms and a rather severe lock-down in Northern Jutland here in Denmark, and quick mass testing among the population, seems to evolve; mink corona has now been found in Sweden too, besides the other countries already mentioned above. It raises the overall question whether the mink mutation problems are potentially related to all mink and mink production in general, and then, what to do about it. You can't euthanize all mink everywhere. It's not that these mutations are more dangerous, it's just that it will delay work with effective vaccines, at least for several months. So far, there's the local lock-down from tomorrow here. But the mutations might have spread further already.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 05, 2020, 11:52:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 05, 2020, 08:58:19 AM
The mink story, resulting in the culling of 1100 local mink farms and a rather severe lock-down in Northern Jutland here in Denmark, and quick mass testing among the population, seems to evolve; mink corona has now been found in Sweden too, besides the other countries already mentioned above. It raises the overall question whether the mink mutation problems are potentially related to all mink and mink production in general, and then, what to do about it. You can't euthanize all mink everywhere. It's not that these mutations are more dangerous, it's just that it will delay work with effective vaccines, at least for several months. So far, there's the local lock-down from tomorrow here. But the mutations might have spread further already.

alarming.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 07, 2020, 05:18:18 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54851759

Covid-19: US hits record daily case rise three days running

More than 127,000 infections were reported in 24 hours, as well as 1,149 deaths.

The news comes as officials announced that White House chief of staff Mark Meadows had also tested positive for the virus.

He is the latest Trump administration official to contract the disease.

The US is the worst affected nation in the world by Covid-19, with more than 9.7 million confirmed cases and a death toll of more than 230,000.

Tracking the global pandemic
Why are infections rising again in US?
It was not immediately clear how Mr Meadows - who has often appeared at public events without a face mask - was infected.

According to the New York Times he first tested positive on Wednesday. Trump election campaign adviser Nick Trainer also has the virus, the paper said.

Mr Meadows travelled with the president on the final days of campaigning and was at an election night party attended by dozens of Trump supporters at the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 07, 2020, 05:24:53 AM
Read a short while ago that non-UK citizens coming from Denmark are now currently banned from traveling to the UK (due to widespread outbreaks of corona virus at mink farms):

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54851042

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 05:55:37 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 07, 2020, 05:24:53 AM
Read a short while ago that non-UK citizens coming from Denmark are now currently banned from traveling to the UK (due to widespread outbreaks of corona virus at mink farms):

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54851042

PD

A lot of debate here - whether it's all exaggerated, including the drastic measures and the quick culling of 17 mio minks (hoped to be carried through within a couple of days from now) + the expensive closure of 1100 farms, since so far the last found example of the mutated virus ('Cluster 5') actually goes back to September; or, alternatively, whether the authorities have been too slow at reacting - the mink farms have had some unchecked workers' traffic from and to Croatia, for example.

The mass testing in Northern Jutland will hopefully give more answers within not many days.
This might cause a lot of future problems, or it might be over already, or soon. But no matter what, mutations might occur later - though not in Denmark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 07, 2020, 07:07:20 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 05:55:37 AM
A lot of debate here - whether it's all exaggerated, including the drastic measures and the quick culling of 17 mio minks (hoped to be carried through within a couple of days from now) + the expensive closure of 1100 farms, since so far the last found example of the mutated virus ('Cluster 5') actually goes back to September; or, alternatively, whether the authorities have been too slow at reacting - the mink farms have had some unchecked workers' traffic from and to Croatia, for example.

The mass testing in Northern Jutland will hopefully give more answers within not many days.
This might cause a lot of future problems, or it might be over already, or soon. But no matter what, mutations might occur later - though not in Denmark.
Hi MT,

I just read another article (believe that it was on CBS website) saying that it was believed that the transmission was from humans to mink and no other-way-around.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-mink-denmark-to-cull-15-million-animals-concern-mutated-covid-infections-in-humans/

In any event, good luck!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 07:12:05 AM
Yes, the humans to mink transition was originally the case here, but then it reversed too. That's the result of studies here.
Thanks. Of course, we all hope for a relative normalization, including options to travel around and abroad a bit next year ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 07, 2020, 08:42:09 AM
Gosh!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 07, 2020, 11:49:45 AM
President-Elect Biden to name his coronavirus task force Monday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 07, 2020, 11:54:30 AM
Northern Jutland, where this mutation (cluster 5) has been found in 5 mink-farms and 12 humans, has been closed very much down. We (I live there) are not allowed to leave our commune for the next four weeks, unless we have a critical funktion. Restaurants are closed, public transport discontinued et.c. and the aim is to test all inhabitants and analyse  the RNA sequence of all positive tests to find the ones with cluster 5.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 12:21:49 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on November 07, 2020, 11:54:30 AM
Northern Jutland, where this mutation (cluster 5) has been found in 5 mink-farms and 12 humans, has been closed very much down. We (I live there) are not allowed to leave our commune for the next four weeks, unless we have a critical funktion. Restaurants are closed, public transport discontinued et.c. and the aim is to test all inhabitants and analyse  the RNA sequence of all positive tests to find the ones with cluster 5.

All the best from here ...
hopefully the mass testing and accompanying efforts will succeed, and rather quickly. At least it's not an introduced curfew. But if they find it spread all over the country, we might be in for further measures nationwide, unless they give up. But WHO today said that it might not represent a vaccine problem anyway. Confusing info at times ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 07, 2020, 12:30:19 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on November 07, 2020, 11:54:30 AM
Northern Jutland, where this mutation (cluster 5) has been found in 5 mink-farms and 12 humans, has been closed very much down. We (I live there) are not allowed to leave our commune for the next four weeks, unless we have a critical funktion. Restaurants are closed, public transport discontinued et.c. and the aim is to test all inhabitants and analyse  the RNA sequence of all positive tests to find the ones with cluster 5.

Warm thoughts, my friend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 07, 2020, 12:47:12 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 07, 2020, 12:30:19 PM
Warm thoughts, my friend!

Thanks xery much.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 07, 2020, 01:05:26 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 12:21:49 PM
All the best from here ...
hopefully the mass testing and accompanying efforts will succeed, and rather quickly. At least it's not an introduced curfew. But if they find it spread all over the country, we might be in for further measures nationwide, unless they give up. But WHO today said that it might not represent a vaccine problem anyway. Confusing info at times ...

Many thanks.

The problem is that we do not know that much about these mink mutations and have to act on a possible risk. Statens Seruminstitut has done much to investigate the subject, already for some time having made RNA sequence analysis of the tests of 14% of the people  infected with mink mutations (that's cluster 1,2,3,4 and 5) and also investigating their antigene properties. But the investigation takes time, much investigation is waiting ahead . WHO and the European centre for disease control have got the preliminary results of the Seruminstitut, and it will be interesting to see if these mutations have been found in other countries, particularly in minks. But as Mølbak said, other countries generally don't  do as many analyzes of mink mutations as we do in Denmark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 07, 2020, 02:57:13 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 07, 2020, 07:12:05 AM
Yes, the humans to mink transition was originally the case here, but then it reversed too. That's the result of studies here.
Thanks. Of course, we all hope for a relative normalization, including options to travel around and abroad a bit next year ...
Sorry, it's been a busy day here, but I just wanted to clarify:  So, 1) did the workers get a different strain of the virus? and 2) are they certain re the chain of events that they received it necessarily from the minks?

PD
Quote from: (: premont :) on November 07, 2020, 12:47:12 PM
Thanks xery much.  :)

Sorry, I'm playing catchup at the moment and am still trying to look into the news; in any event, please be safe premont! 

Best wishes to all,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 03:38:56 AM
There's no cloud without a silver lining. I just received an email from the school to inform me that as a teacher I get a 10% discount on my shopping at the local Morrisons supermarket. Saved me £6.00 yesterday. Whoopy-doo!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 08, 2020, 04:00:29 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 03:38:56 AM
There's no cloud without a silver lining. I just received an email from the school to inform me that as a teacher I get a 10% discount on my shopping at the local Morrisons supermarket. Saved me £6.00 yesterday. Whoopy-doo!  ;D
Yeah!!! Happy for you!

So, you're virtually back?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 08, 2020, 04:10:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 07, 2020, 02:57:13 PM
Sorry, it's been a busy day here, but I just wanted to clarify:  So, 1) did the workers get a different strain of the virus? and 2) are they certain re the chain of events that they received it necessarily from the minks?

1) It isn't published which people have got the cluster 5 variant.

2) We are told by the health authorities that it is certain it originated in minks. i don't know, how they can be sure, but they are.

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter
please be safe premont! 

Thanks, the same to you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 08, 2020, 05:05:03 AM
I did some local checking, and originally, a mink corona virus was found in June, originating from humans working on that farm, but slightly changed in the mink. The animals are very receptive to the virus, and infected people can unknowingly infect others, or the animals, for a week or so. The type was found in animals on three farms, that were culled.

The mink-related type was then shortly afterwards found in 90 people locally, and in a few people in Croatia, who had worked on the farms, however fewer people were being tested back then. But initially, no further farms were found infected, based on a detailed investigation on 10% of all farms in Denmark, that is, 125 of about 1250. This would change however, and soon afterwards, a few further farms were then found infected, most likely it was now humans who brought back the virus to mink farms. Infected farms were mostly just a few km apart, so various transfer options exist (including people, or animals such as birds, sea-gulls, etc.)

(( https://www.ssi.dk/-/media/arkiv/dk/aktuelt/sygdomsudbrud/covid19/besvarelse-virkemidler-til-at-forebygge-smitte-mink-menneske.pdf?la=da ))

In spite of various measures and attempted precautions, the number of infected mink farms had risen in early November to 216. Five virus variations have been found (type Cluster 1-5), and the 'Cluster 5'-type has 4 major changes, that could reduce a vaccine's and also the general human immunity system's effectiveness. That type has been found on 5 farms, and in 12 people (according to information from the 5th of November), all in the Northern Jutland region, and only in the months August-September so far, in spite of tests carried on until mid-October. Overall, mink-related virus was found in 214 persons, of 5102 screenings. 200 of them were in Northern Jutland, out of 535 screenings there, until mid-October.

(( https://www.ssi.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2020/mutationer-i-minkvirus ))





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on November 08, 2020, 05:12:17 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 04, 2020, 07:11:09 AM
Oh my God!  ???  1) I hadn't realized that they were so susceptible to the virus and 2) Couldn't they release them some how or another?  Or figure out something else?  :(

PD

Periodically, here in the UK animal rights activists have raided mink farms and set them loose. The result has been devastating for the local wildlife - minks are vicious predators.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 08, 2020, 05:30:07 AM
Quote from: Biffo on November 08, 2020, 05:12:17 AM
Periodically, here in the UK animal rights activists have raided mink farms and set them loose. The result has been devastating for the local wildlife - minks are vicious predators.
Sorry to hear that Biffo.   :(  The local wildlife certainly shouldn't have to suffer mankind's stupidity (at both ends).

One thing that has crossed my mind more than once:  considering the conditions that they've been kept in (and perhaps due also to how they have been bred?), the food, etc., what do you (meaning a plural you here) think that the chances are that all of this has made them much more susceptible to disease...particularly to the corona virus?

Note:  I was also shocked to hear how many minks there were at these farms and how many farms there were too--just even in Denmark.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 08, 2020, 05:40:49 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 03:38:56 AM
There's no cloud without a silver lining. I just received an email from the school to inform me that as a teacher I get a 10% discount on my shopping at the local Morrisons supermarket. Saved me £6.00 yesterday. Whoopy-doo!  ;D

Better than a kick in the head 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 08, 2020, 05:43:00 AM
Quote from: Biffo on November 08, 2020, 05:12:17 AM
Periodically, here in the UK animal rights activists have raided mink farms and set them loose. The result has been devastating for the local wildlife - minks are vicious predators.

Selective about which animals' rights, are they?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 08, 2020, 05:44:31 AM
For example, a mink is much of a solitary animal, they aren't naturally inclined to the 'social density' at farms, where several animals live in a small cage. It's not like their natural habitat. Stress makes them bite and fight each other, resulting in open wounds. And being passively fed and having little space for physical exercise probably changes (and weakens?) their general physique too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 08, 2020, 05:47:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 08, 2020, 05:44:31 AM
For example, a mink is much of a solitary animal, they aren't naturally inclined to the 'social density' at farms, where several animals live in a small cage. It's not like their natural habitat. Stress makes them bite and fight each other, resulting in open wounds. And being passively fed and having little space for physical exercise probably changes (and weakens?) their general physique too.

Of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 07:43:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 08, 2020, 04:00:29 AM
Yeah!!! Happy for you!

So, you're virtually back?

PD

No, I'm actually back PD on Wednesday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 07:44:02 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 07, 2020, 12:30:19 PM
Warm thoughts, my friend!
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 08, 2020, 11:00:16 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 07:44:02 AM
+1

Thanks. I shall stay indoors almost all the time. Fortunately I have lots of music to listen to.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 08, 2020, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 07:43:01 AM
No, I'm actually back PD on Wednesday.
Huh?!  I had thought that they had suspended in-person classes again?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 10:57:41 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 08, 2020, 12:30:15 PM
Huh?!  I had thought that they had suspended in-person classes again?

PD
No PD. During the first lockdown in March the schools were closed and I had to teach remotely from home (a nightmare for a technophobe) but this time the schools are being kept open as it's felt that closing them will have a very detrimental effect on children's education and mental health. Although my Union opposes keeping the schools open I'm inclined to agree with it myself. I know this sounds like 'famous last words' but the transmission rate in this part of England is comparatively low - however, we are all wearing masks around the school and there is hand sanitiser everywhere. Also, I'm dosed up on Vitamin D tablets!

On a separate note I gather that Joe Biden's father came from Sussex.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 05:00:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on November 08, 2020, 10:57:41 PM
No PD. During the first lockdown in March the schools were closed and I had to teach remotely from home (a nightmare for a technophobe) but this time the schools are being kept open as it's felt that closing them will have a very detrimental effect on children's education and mental health. Although my Union opposes keeping the schools open I'm inclined to agree with it myself. I know this sounds like 'famous last words' but the transmission rate in this part of England is comparatively low - however, we are all wearing masks around the school and there is hand sanitiser everywhere. Also, I'm dosed up on Vitamin D tablets!

On a separate note I gather that Joe Biden's father came from Sussex.  :)
Well, I hope that you all stay safe and well!  Regarding in-class teaching, is this true all over England?  What about in the rest of the UK?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 06:00:12 AM

     The Pfizer vaccine is reported to be more than 90% effective. Wall Street is going crazy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 06:04:19 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/dr-scott-gottlieb-pfizer-covid-vaccine-wont-help-immediately.html

Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC the U.S. will still have to experience "the hardest stretch" of the coronavirus pandemic without the benefits of a vaccine, despite the positive news earlier Monday from Pfizer.

Gottlieb, a former U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner in the Trump administration, is a member of Pfizer's board of directors.

"The vaccine is really a 2021 event in terms of when it's going to provide protective immunity to that initial tranche" of recipients, Gottlieb said on "Squawk Box," shortly after the Pfizer announcement. "Then in terms of when it would be widely available, I think the hope still is ... you could have a vaccine broadly maybe the end of the second quarter, maybe into the third quarter."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 06:34:03 AM
I'm excited to hear the good news!  Are they still doing trials to double-check the safety/any-side-effects of it?  And how long will it take then to ramp up the production of it?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on November 09, 2020, 08:43:19 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 06:34:03 AM
I'm excited to hear the good news!  Are they still doing trials to double-check the safety/any-side-effects of it?  And how long will it take then to ramp up the production of it?

PD

Very good news indeed, in about a year probably.

QuoteThe vaccine is really a 2021 event in terms of when it's going to provide protective immunity to that initial tranche" of recipients, Gottlieb said on "Squawk Box," shortly after the Pfizer announcement. "Then in terms of when it would be widely available, I think the hope still is ... you could have a vaccine broadly maybe the end of the second quarter, maybe into the third quarter. You're looking at having the vaccine available in time for the fall 2021 Covid season."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 08:53:16 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 06:04:19 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/dr-scott-gottlieb-pfizer-covid-vaccine-wont-help-immediately.html

Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC the U.S. will still have to experience "the hardest stretch" of the coronavirus pandemic without the benefits of a vaccine, despite the positive news earlier Monday from Pfizer.

Gottlieb, a former U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner in the Trump administration, is a member of Pfizer's board of directors.

"The vaccine is really a 2021 event in terms of when it's going to provide protective immunity to that initial tranche" of recipients, Gottlieb said on "Squawk Box," shortly after the Pfizer announcement. "Then in terms of when it would be widely available, I think the hope still is ... you could have a vaccine broadly maybe the end of the second quarter, maybe into the third quarter."


     It won't arrive any sooner. When it does, the path to herd immunity will be shorter than most experts anticipated. Fauci said he wanted 75%, but also said 50% would work. A 90%+ vaccine would work faster to bring the numbers down. This is why Wall St. popped big time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 08:58:27 AM
Wonder what Pfizer will charge for it?  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 09, 2020, 09:30:15 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 08:53:16 AM
     It won't arrive any sooner. When it does, the path to herd immunity will be shorter than most experts anticipated. Fauci said he wanted 75%, but also said 50% would work. A 90%+ vaccine would work faster to bring the numbers down. This is why Wall St. popped big time.

There's just been a press conference in the UK where Van Tam, a big wig scientists in the government  said

Quote
We  do not know yet if the vaccines will prevent asymptomatic transmission. And that means we do know know yet whether they will stop the spread of the disease.

It might be that they just change the nature of the disease, he says.

I'm not sure if I really understand it. He seems to be saying that the vaccines may stop people developing nasty symptoms, even though they still have the disease brewing inside them and are spreading it about.


You can read it here

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2020/nov/09/coronavirus-covid-uk-live-news-updates-keir-starmer-boris-johnson
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 09:39:06 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 08:58:27 AM
Wonder what Pfizer will charge for it?  :-\

     It shouldn't matter. The public interest is for everyone to take it. The cost of not vaccinating is higher than vaccinating no matter what the immediate dollar calculation says. That's always the case, it's just clearer when hundreds of thousands of lives are at stake and not "merely" hundreds of thousands of jobs. As it happens, it's both.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on November 09, 2020, 09:45:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 09, 2020, 09:30:15 AM
There's just been a press conference in the UK where Van Tam, a big wig scientists in the government  said

I'm not sure if I really understand it. He seems to be saying that the vaccines may stop people developing nasty symptoms, even though they still have the disease brewing inside them and are spreading it about.


You can read it here

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2020/nov/09/coronavirus-covid-uk-live-news-updates-keir-starmer-boris-johnson

Yes, it means that the vaccine would just prevent you from getting symptoms, i.e. ill from the virus, but you'd still be a carrier and probably a spreader too, like many asymptomatic, seemingly healthy people have been spreading it already.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 09, 2020, 09:48:05 AM
Quote from: North Star on November 09, 2020, 09:45:51 AM
Yes, it means that the vaccine would just prevent you from getting symptoms, i.e. ill from the virus, but you'd still be a carrier and probably a spreader too, like many asymptomatic, seemingly healthy people have been spreading it already.

Are there any other vaccines which work like that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on November 09, 2020, 10:01:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 09, 2020, 09:48:05 AM
Are there any other vaccines which work like that?
Tetanus vaccine, but it doesn't spread from people to people..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 10:09:17 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 09:39:06 AM
     It shouldn't matter. The public interest is for everyone to take it. The cost of not vaccinating is higher than vaccinating no matter what the immediate dollar calculation says. That's always the case, it's just clearer when hundreds of thousands of lives are at stake and not "merely" hundreds of thousands of jobs. As it happens, it's both.
I understand, drogulus, that it's in everyone's best interest to take it.  I was just pondering a couple of things like: 1) how affordable it will be for people to get it? 2) would the government(s) subsidize vaccinations, and 3) wondering what kind of profit Pfizer would be making off it?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 10:19:40 AM
Quote from: North Star on November 09, 2020, 09:45:51 AM
Yes, it means that the vaccine would just prevent you from getting symptoms, i.e. ill from the virus, but you'd still be a carrier and probably a spreader too, like many asymptomatic, seemingly healthy people have been spreading it already.

     I think the doctor was indicating that he doesn't know how effective the vaccine will be at preventing asymptomatic transmission.

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 10:09:17 AM
I understand, drogulus, that it's in everyone's best interest to take it.  I was just pondering a couple of things like: 1) how affordable it will be for people to get it? 2) would the government(s) subsidize vaccinations, and 3) wondering what kind of profit Pfizer would be making off it?

PD

     Making the vaccine affordable is as necessary as developing and manufacturing it. What point would there be for this gigantic effort if we ran out of dollars for the actual vaccination?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 09, 2020, 10:19:47 AM
The problem isn't the vaccination. The problem is the waiting and what needs to be done while we wait on a vaccine. What needs to be mandated are masks and this is what Trump should've done when he was briefed on the virus earlier in the year, but now we're faced with an ever growing population with a higher risk of the getting the virus because of the current administration's failed policies. So we're dealing with the negative effects of the belief that COVID doesn't exist while people are dying everyday thanks to the inactivity in combatting the virus and the general apathetic viewpoint held by Trump and his administration.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 10:25:05 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 10:19:40 AM
     I think the doctor was indicating that he doesn't know how effective the vaccine will be at preventing asymptomatic transmission.

     Making the vaccine affordable is as necessary as developing and manufacturing it. What point would there be for this gigantic effort if we ran out of dollars for the actual vaccination?
Of course!  I'll be interested in seeing, though, how much Pfizer (and any other drug companies working on vaccines for it) try to milk the system.  To be fair, though, they didn't take any US government money for developing it and I suspect that they won't share the cost(s) in doing so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 09, 2020, 11:04:11 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 09, 2020, 10:19:40 AM
     I think the doctor was indicating that he doesn't know how effective the vaccine will be at preventing asymptomatic transmission.

   

Because it isn't stopping you brewing the virus in enough quantities to pass it on, in a dose sufficient for that second person to pass it on to a third in a sufficient dose for that third to pass it on . . . But all of this without symptoms. I just have never come across a vaccine which does that before - it's more like a symptom suppressor than a vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 11:19:17 AM
It's becoming apparent that the White House hosted another superspreader event, this one on Election Night:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covid-19-trump-campaign-official-david-bossie-has-coronavirus.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/hud-secretary-ben-carson-tests-positive-for-coronavirus.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 11:28:13 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-09/pfizer-vaccine-s-funding-came-from-berlin-not-washington

Vice President Mike Pence was among Trump administration officials saying support from the government's Operation Warp Speed program helped accelerate the development of the vaccine, which was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing symptomatic Covid-19 infections in an interim analysis.


The truth is that Pfizer didn't receive any funding from Operation Warp Speed for the development, clinical trial and manufacturing of the vaccine. Rather, its partner, BioNTech SE, has received money -- from the German government.
...

Berlin gave the German company $445 million in an agreement in September to help accelerate the vaccine by building out manufacturing and development capacity in its home market.

What the U.S. did, meanwhile, was commit to buying hundreds of millions of vaccines in advance to ensure Americans were among the first in line if it clinches an emergency-use authorization or approval from the FDA. The Trump administration agreed in July to pay almost $2 billion for 100 million doses, with an option to acquire as many as 500 million more, once that clearance comes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 01:08:47 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 11:28:13 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-09/pfizer-vaccine-s-funding-came-from-berlin-not-washington

Vice President Mike Pence was among Trump administration officials saying support from the government's Operation Warp Speed program helped accelerate the development of the vaccine, which was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing symptomatic Covid-19 infections in an interim analysis.


The truth is that Pfizer didn't receive any funding from Operation Warp Speed for the development, clinical trial and manufacturing of the vaccine. Rather, its partner, BioNTech SE, has received money -- from the German government.
...

Berlin gave the German company $445 million in an agreement in September to help accelerate the vaccine by building out manufacturing and development capacity in its home market.

What the U.S. did, meanwhile, was commit to buying hundreds of millions of vaccines in advance to ensure Americans were among the first in line if it clinches an emergency-use authorization or approval from the FDA. The Trump administration agreed in July to pay almost $2 billion for 100 million doses, with an option to acquire as many as 500 million more, once that clearance comes.
Interesting.  I wonder how instrumental  BioNTech SE was in things?  Or perhaps 'just' will be in terms of the manufacture of more of the vaccine in the future?

If I did the calculations correctly (lots of zeros involved!), that works out to be about $20/dose that the US government will be shelling out at least initially?

PD

p.s.  Yes, and I did read earlier about VP Pence trying to take credit for the Trump administration helping to come up with the vaccine (as you mentioned).  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 09, 2020, 01:36:23 PM
Seems that the Pfizer news stories generate good expectations as regards many other vaccines in the making as well, including some in my region.
Apparently the Pfizer one is covered by EU agreements too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 01:38:52 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 09, 2020, 01:36:23 PM
Seems that the Pfizer news generate good expectations as regards many other vaccines in the making as well, including some in my region.
Apparently the Pfizer one is covered by EU agreements too.
Oh, interesting MT!  So, (and I'm guessing here) that in return for receiving the money from the German government (any others involved?), they agreed to certain quantities supplied and to whom?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 09, 2020, 01:56:02 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 01:38:52 PM
Oh, interesting MT!  So, (and I'm guessing here) that in return for receiving the money from the German government (any others involved?), they agreed to certain quantities supplied and to whom?

PD

I've only heard one source for the EU/Denmark stuff, a reporter-doctor from the main broadcast station this evening - his impression after some research was that it was covered by EU collective agreements/buyings. He also said, that Pfizer is waiting for a confirmation of the vaccine effect, via tests that double the statistical material, and make it more certain.

Having returned from some evening work in town, I now see that the agreement for 300-400 mio vaccines to the EU is still in a waiting position, but that it should be signed 'soon'. No info regarding price levels in the single source I consulted
https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/1109/1176940-pfizer-covid-vaccine/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 03:01:11 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 09, 2020, 01:08:47 PM
Interesting.  I wonder how instrumental  BioNTech SE was in things?  Or perhaps 'just' will be in terms of the manufacture of more of the vaccine in the future?

If I did the calculations correctly (lots of zeros involved!), that works out to be about $20/dose that the US government will be shelling out at least initially?

PD

p.s.  Yes, and I did read earlier about VP Pence trying to take credit for the Trump administration helping to come up with the vaccine (as you mentioned).  ::)

Somewhere way above in this thread I posted a Bloomberg (iirc) link to an interview with Pfizer's CEO, in which the CEO explained why he refused to take "Operation Warp Speed" money.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 10, 2020, 05:15:43 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 09, 2020, 03:01:11 PM
Somewhere way above in this thread I posted a Bloomberg (iirc) link to an interview with Pfizer's CEO, in which the CEO explained why he refused to take "Operation Warp Speed" money.
Thanks, I'll take a look at it--after a bit of breakfast.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 10, 2020, 05:30:44 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on November 09, 2020, 10:19:47 AM
The problem isn't the vaccination. The problem is the waiting and what needs to be done while we wait on a vaccine. What needs to be mandated are masks and this is what Trump should've done when he was briefed on the virus earlier in the year, but now we're faced with an ever growing population with a higher risk of the getting the virus because of the current administration's failed policies. So we're dealing with the negative effects of the belief that COVID doesn't exist while people are dying everyday thanks to the inactivity in combatting the virus and the general apathetic viewpoint held by Trump and his administration.

Not only of people believing that COVID isn't real (or is overblown), but also people who are suspicious of any new vaccine. PBS reported yesterday that only 60% of *physicians* (and 40% of nurses) said they would queue up to receive the vaccine at the earliest opportunity.

As to the cost, on the same broadcast it was reported that the U.S. government contracted to buy 100 million doses at a total cost of $2 billion (2 x 10^9). That sounds like $20/dose, at least in quantity.

Edit: whoops! Looks like T.D. beat me to it...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 10, 2020, 05:44:17 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 10, 2020, 05:30:44 AM
Not only of people believing that COVID isn't real (or is overblown), but also people who are suspicious of any new vaccine. PBS reported yesterday that only 60% of *physicians* (and 40% of nurses) said they would queue up to receive the vaccine at the earliest opportunity.

As to the cost, on the same broadcast it was reported that the U.S. government contracted to buy 100 million doses at a total cost of $2 billion (2 x 10^9). That sounds like $20/dose, at least in quantity.

Edit: whoops! Looks like T.D. beat me to it...

I think generally that it's wise to be distrustful of new medications, though in some cases you may come to the conclusion that it's worth taking the risk. But I can well understand if a healthy 50 or 60 or 70 year old woman, for example, decides that she'll wait a few years before taking a COVID vaccine, if offered.

The Pfizner molecule is in a particularly unknown territory, all sorts of monsters may well be lying in wait there and the only way to find out is to suck it and see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 10, 2020, 07:13:16 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 10, 2020, 05:15:43 AM
Thanks, I'll take a look at it--after a bit of breakfast.

PD

Googled and found this full transcript from 13 Sep:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-pfizer-ceo-dr-albert-bourla-on-face-the-nation-september-13-2020/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 10, 2020, 09:20:09 AM
Interesting article on mitigating superspreader risk:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-10/covid-superspreader-risk-is-linked-to-restaurants-gyms-hotels
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 10, 2020, 11:51:47 AM

     COVID research updates: Uninfected children have antibodies to the coronavirus (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00502-w)

Scientists have found antibodies that recognize SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of people who have never caught the virus. Children are particularly likely to harbour such antibodies, which might explain why most infected children have either mild illness or none at all.

It has been unclear whether previous infection with one of the 'seasonal' coronaviruses — which cause the common cold — wards off SARS-CoV-2 or its severe symptoms. George Kassiotis at the Francis Crick Institute in London and his colleagues analysed blood samples from both adults and children who had not been infected with the new virus (K. W. Ng et al. Science https://doi.org/fg9k; 2020). The samples were collected either before the pandemic began or just as the virus began its global march.

The team found that roughly 5% of 302 uninfected adult participants had antibodies that recognize SARS-CoV-2. So did more than 60% of uninfected participants aged 6 to 16 — the age group in which antibodies to seasonal coronaviruses are most common. Most blood samples from uninfected people who had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 blocked the new coronavirus from infecting cells in lab dishes.


      Some of the viruses that cause the common cold trigger an immune response that blocks the Covid-19 virus. The antibodies recognize the base of the coronavirus spike common to all such viruses, not the tip of the spike unique to Covid-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 10, 2020, 03:06:21 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-10/deep-freeze-challenge-makes-pfizer-s-shot-a-vaccine-for-the-rich

...That euphoria is now being diluted by the realization that no currently used vaccine has ever been made from the messenger RNA technology deployed in Pfizer's shot, which instructs the human body to produce proteins that then develop protective antibodies.

That means that countries will need to build from scratch the deep-freeze production, storage and transportation networks needed for the vaccine to survive. The massive investment and coordination required all but ensures that only rich nations are guaranteed access -- and even then perhaps only their urban populations.
...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 11, 2020, 05:23:10 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 10, 2020, 03:06:21 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-10/deep-freeze-challenge-makes-pfizer-s-shot-a-vaccine-for-the-rich

...That euphoria is now being diluted by the realization that no currently used vaccine has ever been made from the messenger RNA technology deployed in Pfizer's shot, which instructs the human body to produce proteins that then develop protective antibodies.

That means that countries will need to build from scratch the deep-freeze production, storage and transportation networks needed for the vaccine to survive. The massive investment and coordination required all but ensures that only rich nations are guaranteed access -- and even then perhaps only their urban populations.
...
I watched a story on the news (yesterday I think?) about the necessary cold conditions.  A bit more news here:  https://khn.org/morning-breakout/extreme-cold-pfizer-vaccine-requires-will-make-broad-distribution-tough/  I don't know how they/we are going to be able to get the vaccine distributed evenly and quickly.   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 11, 2020, 07:13:11 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-11/sweden-imposes-partial-lockdown-of-bars-with-alcohol-curfew

For the first time since the pandemic started, Sweden is imposing a partial lockdown on bars and restaurants by banning the sale of alcohol after 10 p.m.

The restriction marks a departure from the country's previous guidelines that relied mainly on voluntary measures to stop transmission. The new measure applies across the country from Nov. 20 and means all businesses with a license to serve alcohol must close by 10:30 p.m.


"We are facing a situation that could turn black as night," Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said at a press conference in Stockholm. "We risk ending up in the situation we had last spring."

Amid a new wave of curbs on movement, authorities in 13 of Sweden's 21 regions have issued recommendations that, among other things, urge citizens to avoid physical contact with people with whom they don't share a home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 11, 2020, 08:13:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 10, 2020, 05:44:17 AM
I think generally that it's wise to be distrustful of new medications, though in some cases you may come to the conclusion that it's worth taking the risk. But I can well understand if a healthy 50 or 60 or 70 year old woman, for example, decides that she'll wait a few years before taking a COVID vaccine, if offered.

The Pfizner molecule is in a particularly unknown territory, all sorts of monsters may well be lying in wait there and the only way to find out is to suck it and see.

I don't dispute the thinking, but the fact remains that it is a serious barrier to herd immunity, assuming that is possible against this virus. If we have one or more effective vaccines, then the only way this pandemic will end happily is if the majority of people put aside their anxiety about this new medication. And the fact is that after the Phase 3 trials are complete, we will have a very good idea of the short term safety profiles of each vaccine. The possibility of long-term side-effects will, of course, not be ruled out for some time.

Hence the reason for my post: to point out that we have a form of the prisoner's dilemma here, where rational individuals make rational decisions that conflict with both the collective best interest and with their own. It does not seem to help to argue that if everyone thinks only of themselves, then no one will be safe from the virus. The only way out, I think, is if people can be convinced that the risk of an adverse effect is much less than that of contracting the virus in the absence of herd immunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 11, 2020, 12:47:51 PM

     I'll get the vaccine as soon as I can. It's a matter of shifting the probabilities in my favor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 11, 2020, 01:01:46 PM
When a reliable vaccine is available to me, I'm in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 11, 2020, 02:45:30 PM
This just in from Superspreader Central:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/11/covid-19-new-coronavirus-case-from-trump-white-house-election-party.html

And some typical denialism:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-11/trump-makes-last-push-to-speed-up-chicken-lines-despite-pandemic
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 11, 2020, 11:27:07 PM
Quote from: drogulus on November 11, 2020, 12:47:51 PM
     I'll get the vaccine as soon as I can. It's a matter of shifting the probabilities in my favor.
Are you in a group particularly at risk of developing a serious illness from COVID?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 11, 2020, 11:33:31 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 11, 2020, 08:13:33 AM
I don't dispute the thinking, but the fact remains that it is a serious barrier to herd immunity, assuming that is possible against this virus. If we have one or more effective vaccines, then the only way this pandemic will end happily is if the majority of people put aside their anxiety about this new medication. And the fact is that after the Phase 3 trials are complete, we will have a very good idea of the short term safety profiles of each vaccine. The possibility of long-term side-effects will, of course, not be ruled out for some time.

Hence the reason for my post: to point out that we have a form of the prisoner's dilemma here, where rational individuals make rational decisions that conflict with both the collective best interest and with their own. It does not seem to help to argue that if everyone thinks only of themselves, then no one will be safe from the virus. The only way out, I think, is if people can be convinced that the risk of an adverse effect is much less than that of contracting the virus in the absence of herd immunity.

We can't say that if everyone takes it we'll all be better off because we're uncertain of the effects of taking it. So it's a more complicated problem than balancing individual choice and collective rationality.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 12, 2020, 01:50:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 11, 2020, 11:33:31 PM
We can't say that if everyone takes it we'll all be better off because we're uncertain of the effects of taking it. So it's a more complicated problem than balancing individual choice and collective rationality.

Yes, but even with say only 50% protection it will be a great step forward. The late side effects may be more troublesome, but we can't know them all by now.

Protection will probably be less efficient in older people because of their more lazy immune system. But one can hope, that it at least will be able to milden the course of the disease.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Jo498 on November 12, 2020, 02:06:07 AM
For anyone not at high risk it pretty clearly seems a higher risk to try a vaccine with considerable side effects (some tests were stopped because of them) that hits the market after only about one year of testing and development (five years is usually very fast for vaccines, the record so far supposedly is a bit less than five years for a mumps vaccine, I've heard) and also uses a method (RNA whatever) that has never before used for vaccines on humans. It seems that the social control experiment is now followed by a pharmakological experiment on unprecedented scale and almost everybody is happy to follow suit...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 12, 2020, 02:26:26 AM
Obviously, there's a wide range of vaccines about to be launched, and they'll be of varied content and also with varying functions. A professor here emphasized, that some types of vaccines might reduce symptoms only, not eliminating the option of the person to transmit the virus totally, but that all this will be related to political, doctoral and scientific priorities on the way.

We just heard here in Denmark that one of our state institute's vaccines is about to be tested on humans now, but that the real launch will only take place in early 2022. This vaccine, not aspiring to be among the first in the vaccine race, will for example be different in the way that it is more 'modular' than most others, allowing quick adjustments in the composition related to those who need it, or due to ongoing changes in the virus.

It seems that several of the vaccines underway will have high efficiency percentages. Vaccines are likely to be given to selected people such as health workers and elderly people at first, and obviously, knowledge and the study material regarding the individual vaccines will gradually grow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 12, 2020, 02:43:45 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 12, 2020, 02:26:26 AM
Obviously, there's a wide range of vaccines about to be launched, and they'll be of varied content and also with varying functions. A professor here emphasized, that some types of vaccines might reduce symptoms only, not eliminating the option of the person to transmit the virus totally, but that all this will be related to political, doctoral and scientific priorities on the way.

Symptom-free carriers , which may not have had any symptoms at all, and who still are able to transmit diseases are not that unusual. This is more common with bacterial diseases e.g. MRSA or meningococci, but also viral diseases e.g. herpes genitaiis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 12, 2020, 06:01:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 11, 2020, 11:27:07 PM
Are you in a group particularly at risk of developing a serious illness from COVID?

     I don't think so, even though many people my age are. I have no illnesses of the kind that would put me at greater risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 12, 2020, 06:11:18 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 11, 2020, 11:33:31 PM
We can't say that if everyone takes it we'll all be better off because we're uncertain of the effects of taking it. So it's a more complicated problem than balancing individual choice and collective rationality.

I agree, and I think I said that... it's not even certain that herd immunity is possible with this virus. Nevertheless, the individual/collective choice is an important dimension of the problem IMO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 11:25:15 AM
I worked for the Postal Service for 33+ years as a letter carrier before retiring December 31, 2019.  Recent state mandates now require the public to wear masks inside and outside in public spaces. Meanwhile folks in the PO up my way are arguing whether they can be forced to wear masks. Many feel it should be a personal choice. Apparently from conversations with a former coworker who I speak to on a regular basis states pretty much nobody wears a mask at present at my old office. So friggin' glad I don't work there anymore.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 12, 2020, 11:34:52 AM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 11:25:15 AM
I worked for the Postal Service for 33+ years as a letter carrier before retiring December 31, 2019.  Recent state mandates now require the public to wear masks inside and outside in public spaces. Meanwhile folks in the PO up my way are arguing whether they can be forced to wear masks. Many feel it should be a personal choice. Apparently from conversations with a former coworker who I speak to on a regular basis states pretty much nobody wears a mask at present at my old office. So friggin' glad I don't work there anymore.

No kidding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 12, 2020, 12:00:42 PM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 11:25:15 AM
I worked for the Postal Service for 33+ years as a letter carrier before retiring December 31, 2019.  Recent state mandates now require the public to wear masks inside and outside in public spaces. Meanwhile folks in the PO up my way are arguing whether they can be forced to wear masks. Many feel it should be a personal choice. Apparently from conversations with a former coworker who I speak to on a regular basis states pretty much nobody wears a mask at present at my old office. So friggin' glad I don't work there anymore.

     I'm not coming back until I can eat breakfast at Congdon's.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 12, 2020, 12:36:43 PM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 11:25:15 AM
I worked for the Postal Service for 33+ years as a letter carrier before retiring December 31, 2019.  Recent state mandates now require the public to wear masks inside and outside in public spaces. Meanwhile folks in the PO up my way are arguing whether they can be forced to wear masks. Many feel it should be a personal choice. Apparently from conversations with a former coworker who I speak to on a regular basis states pretty much nobody wears a mask at present at my old office. So friggin' glad I don't work there anymore.
Sorry to hear that Tom.  I hope that those who feel that way there change their minds--particularly with the rapid increase of cases.

I'm curious as to whether (talking to your former coworker) he/she had any comments about their thoughts on the new (Trump-appointed) head of the postal service's actions regarding equipment removal and/or destruction?  And, for what it's worth, all that I've seen and heard regarding the delivery of ballots, were that the USPS took very seriously the delivery of mail-in ballots to individuals and back to the city/town clerks' offices and, I suspect, busted their backs to do their very best....regardless of any judges order.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 12, 2020, 12:52:41 PM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 11:25:15 AM
I worked for the Postal Service for 33+ years as a letter carrier before retiring December 31, 2019.  Recent state mandates now require the public to wear masks inside and outside in public spaces. Meanwhile folks in the PO up my way are arguing whether they can be forced to wear masks. Many feel it should be a personal choice. Apparently from conversations with a former coworker who I speak to on a regular basis states pretty much nobody wears a mask at present at my old office. So friggin' glad I don't work there anymore.

Yes, this is rather unfortunate to read. I see USPS carriers with no masks all the time. It shouldn't be a personal choice. It should be mandated that all employees of USPS wear masks. If not, they they will be reprimanded. It's our civic duty to wear them! Congratulations on your retirement, btw. I know you're happy you don't have to see that place again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 12, 2020, 01:30:33 PM
Quote from: drogulus on November 12, 2020, 06:01:39 AM
     I don't think so, even though many people my age are. I have no illnesses of the kind that would put me at greater risk.

That shows the danger of icons. In my head, because of your icon, your about 20.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 12, 2020, 01:32:41 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 12, 2020, 01:30:33 PM
That shows the danger of icons. In my head, because of your icon, your about 20.

     That was 1970, when I was 21. I don't play guitar through 3 amps any more.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 12, 2020, 01:34:28 PM
Meanwhile, over in "It it what it is" country.

The Texas Tribune reports:
El Paso hospitals are so overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients that the county has summoned 10 mobile morgues.
With the holidays approaching, health officials and funeral homes are bracing for a potential crush of hospitalizations in Texas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 01:56:35 PM
Quote from: drogulus on November 12, 2020, 12:00:42 PM
     I'm not coming back until I can eat breakfast at Congdon's.
Ha! I live a short distance from Congdon's. Just window service and drive through these days. The food trucks still did well during the summer months. Plenty of property to social distance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 02:09:06 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 12, 2020, 12:36:43 PM
Sorry to hear that Tom.  I hope that those who feel that way there change their minds--particularly with the rapid increase of cases.

I'm curious as to whether (talking to your former coworker) he/she had any comments about their thoughts on the new (Trump-appointed) head of the postal service's actions regarding equipment removal and/or destruction?  And, for what it's worth, all that I've seen and heard regarding the delivery of ballots, were that the USPS took very seriously the delivery of mail-in ballots to individuals and back to the city/town clerks' offices and, I suspect, busted their backs to do their very best....regardless of any judges order.

Best wishes,

PD
In reference to the removal of sorting machines my friend felt that Trump was trying to undermine the credibility of the Postal Service. LeJoy was just his stooge. Glad that not many people bought into that nonsense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 02:16:01 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on November 12, 2020, 12:52:41 PM
Congratulations on your retirement, btw. I know you're happy you don't have to see that place again.
Thanks for the good words. Never did I ever imagine what would be in store for all of us when I walked out that door on my very last day. What a year it has been.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 12, 2020, 04:24:04 PM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 12, 2020, 02:16:01 PM
Thanks for the good words. Never did I ever imagine what would be in store for all of us when I walked out that door on my very last day. What a year it has been.

No kidding. Now, if we might only get COVID-19 to retire....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 13, 2020, 02:22:37 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-13/trump-silent-on-virus-surge-as-cases-and-deaths-rise-sharply

...
"I find it really just unbelievable that the federal government has just thrown in the towel on this and is doing nothing," said Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown School of Public Health. He expects Biden to inherit an even more dire picture.


"We are in the worst shape that we have been in, in the pandemic. Things are awful and they are going to get much, much worse," he said.

The US recorded 145,000 cases on Thursday, second only to the 152,000 a day earlier, roughly double the figures from just two weeks earlier. Deaths have been trending upward as well with nearly 2,000 on Wednesday alone.

Average of daily U.S. cases has topped 100,000
Data show the virus surging across the entire country, in both cities and smaller towns and in virtually every state. About 65,000 Americans are currently hospitalized from the virus, according to the Covid Tracking Project, another record. The situation is likely to worsen, fueled by cold weather and Thanksgiving gatherings, public health experts say.

Larry Hogan, Maryland's Republican governor and a Trump critic, said the states last had a call with the White House coronavirus task force on Nov. 2.

More from Election
Trump's Taiwan, Hong Kong Support Poses Early Test for Biden
Trump Ripped Oval Office Defense From His Business Playbook
Trump and Twitter Enter a New Phase in a Tortured Relationship
China Joins Nations Congratulating Biden on U.S. Election Win
"It's one of the things I'm frustrated about," Hogan said Thursday. "The states are out here fighting probably the worst part of the crisis we've ever had to deal with and we don't really know what's going on at the federal level and we don't see any action out of Congress either."
...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 13, 2020, 07:17:45 AM
Pfizer's Art of the Deal

Why it kept the Trump administration at arm's length. (https://thebulwark.com/pfizers-art-of-the-deal/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 13, 2020, 07:30:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 13, 2020, 07:17:45 AM
Pfizer's Art of the Deal

Why it kept the Trump administration at arm's length. (https://thebulwark.com/pfizers-art-of-the-deal/)


Interesting. The American Enterprise Institute ripping Cheeto Mussolini?
Who'da thunk it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 13, 2020, 09:49:08 AM
Latest from Superspreader Central:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/13/more-than-130-secret-service-officers-are-isolating-due-to-covid-19-outbreak-report-says.html

More than 130 U.S. Secret Service officers have been ordered to isolate after testing positive for Covid-19 or being exposed to an infected co-worker, The Washington Post reported Friday.

The sidelined officers make up roughly 10% of the USSS core security team, according to the Post.

The outbreak is thought to be partially related to President Donald Trump's campaign rallies, sources told the paper.

The president maintained a busy campaign travel schedule in the weeks leading up to Election Day, hosting large rallies that were criticized for their scant mask-wearing and lack of social distancing.

Covid-19 infections have also recently afflicted prominent figures in the Trump campaign and White House, including Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, campaign advisor Corey Lewandowski and White House political affairs director Brian Jack.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on November 14, 2020, 06:48:55 AM
Covid cases in U.S. could be near zero in 6 months, UBS economist says.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/13/vaccine-could-add-1-percentage-point-to-us-gdp-in-2021-ubs-says.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 14, 2020, 07:31:29 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/we-blew-it-us-reaches-explosive-covid-19-spread-as-virus-is-nearly-impossible-to-control-experts-say-210948870.html

...
But while the restrictions and stay-at-home orders may help limit the damage, Dr. Gregory Poland, an infectious disease expert and head of Mayo Clinic's Vaccine Research Group, says it may be too little too late. "We are now exponential. You cannot control exponentiality. We blew it; we're past that," Poland tells Yahoo Life. "Now the only options are that something happens with the virus where it dies out, we lock down like many places in Europe are doing, or we find a vaccine that's highly effective that virtually everybody takes. Those are our only options at this point."

Pfizer announced this week that its COVID-19 vaccine was more than 90 percent effective in phase III clinical trials, which is promising. Still, with approval likely weeks away and widespread availability not predicted until 2021, the situation in the U.S. — at this point — remains bleak. "I wish I could give you better news," says Alagoz. "But until we have a vaccine that is available or, as a community, many people change their behavior, I am not expecting that it's going to slow down."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on November 14, 2020, 07:50:22 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 14, 2020, 07:31:29 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/we-blew-it-us-reaches-explosive-covid-19-spread-as-virus-is-nearly-impossible-to-control-experts-say-210948870.html

...
But while the restrictions and stay-at-home orders may help limit the damage, Dr. Gregory Poland, an infectious disease expert and head of Mayo Clinic's Vaccine Research Group, says it may be too little too late. "We are now exponential. You cannot control exponentiality. We blew it; we're past that," Poland tells Yahoo Life. "Now the only options are that something happens with the virus where it dies out, we lock down like many places in Europe are doing, or we find a vaccine that's highly effective that virtually everybody takes. Those are our only options at this point."

Pfizer announced this week that its COVID-19 vaccine was more than 90 percent effective in phase III clinical trials, which is promising. Still, with approval likely weeks away and widespread availability not predicted until 2021, the situation in the U.S. — at this point — remains bleak. "I wish I could give you better news," says Alagoz. "But until we have a vaccine that is available or, as a community, many people change their behavior, I am not expecting that it's going to slow down."


The WBI (We Blew It) thesis appears to be strong. True, virus can spread exponentially but they cannot be reduced exponentially. Plus the behavior of people in the U.S.A..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 14, 2020, 05:30:42 PM
Although it cannot be reduced exponentially, the exponential factor can be reduced until it no longer looks like exponential growth. We did it in the spring. The problem is the behavior of people. I'm not sure how much is pandemic fatigue and how much is complacency, but even here where compliance used to be good, it no longer is. And the virus is gaining the upper hand, even in communities that were until very recently nearly untouched.

Understanding exponential growth is something many people have trouble with. There is the classic riddle: if the number of cases has a doubling time of one day but takes 48 days to infect the entire population, how many days does it take to infect only half the population?

The answer, of course, is 47. It is on the 48th day that it infects the other half.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on November 14, 2020, 05:58:01 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 14, 2020, 05:30:42 PM
Although it cannot be reduced exponentially, the exponential factor can be reduced until it no longer looks like exponential growth. We did it in the spring. The problem is the behavior of people. I'm not sure how much is pandemic fatigue and how much is complacency, but even here where compliance used to be good, it no longer is. And the virus is gaining the upper hand, even in communities that were until very recently nearly untouched.

Understanding exponential growth is something many people have trouble with. There is the classic riddle: if the number of cases has a doubling time of one day but takes 48 days to infect the entire population, how many days does it take to infect only half the population?

The answer, of course, is 47. It is on the 48th day that it infects the other half.

I had this very conversation with my wife over dinner this evening. In addition to the math,  she contends that no matter what steps had been taken early times, we would still be in this same fix because people (Americans in particular) are such selfish boneheads that they won't follow any guideline, even on threat of death.

I believe that firm and reasonable government action had been taken during the 'grace period' at the beginning of the infection, the numbers of cases would have been exponentially smaller than they are now. On a 'deaths per million of population' basis, countries who took action are infinitely better off, even though they do have some cases. USA is ca. 690 deaths per million (USA: We're #1). Japan, China & Vietnam are below 3. Most of the differential comes from the fact that they have recently had major epidemics (SARS & MERS within the last 10 years, for example), so they had a plan they knew worked. But the much larger balance of the difference comes from the fact that the people did what the hell they were told. If it was just the stupid people dying, I would be good with that. But they  pass it around so generously before they go. >:(

8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on November 14, 2020, 06:21:30 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on November 14, 2020, 05:58:01 PM
I had this very conversation with my wife over dinner this evening. In addition to the math,  she contends that no matter what steps had been taken early times, we would still be in this same fix because people (Americans in particular) are such selfish boneheads that they won't follow any guideline, even on threat of death.

I believe that firm and reasonable government action had been taken during the 'grace period' at the beginning of the infection, the numbers of cases would have been exponentially smaller than they are now. On a 'deaths per million of population' basis, countries who took action are infinitely better off, even though they do have some cases. USA is ca. 690 deaths per million (USA: We're #1). Japan, China & Vietnam are below 3. Most of the differential comes from the fact that they have recently had major epidemics (SARS & MERS within the last 10 years, for example), so they had a plan they knew worked. But the much larger balance of the difference comes from the fact that the people did what the hell they were told. If it was just the stupid people dying, I would be good with that. But they  pass it around so generously before they go. >:(

8)

In addition to the difference in education and moral, are the people potentially less risk-averse? Or just inconsiderate and irresponsible?   ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 14, 2020, 06:44:29 PM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on November 14, 2020, 05:58:01 PM
I had this very conversation with my wife over dinner this evening. In addition to the math,  she contends that no matter what steps had been taken early times, we would still be in this same fix because people (Americans in particular) are such selfish boneheads that they won't follow any guideline, even on threat of death.

I believe that firm and reasonable government action had been taken during the 'grace period' at the beginning of the infection, the numbers of cases would have been exponentially smaller than they are now. On a 'deaths per million of population' basis, countries who took action are infinitely better off, even though they do have some cases. USA is ca. 690 deaths per million (USA: We're #1). Japan, China & Vietnam are below 3. Most of the differential comes from the fact that they have recently had major epidemics (SARS & MERS within the last 10 years, for example), so they had a plan they knew worked. But the much larger balance of the difference comes from the fact that the people did what the hell they were told. If it was just the stupid people dying, I would be good with that. But they  pass it around so generously before they go. >:(

8)

Selfish boneheads ... ain't that America ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 15, 2020, 05:50:48 AM
Current situation in the Netherlands:

Number of newly registered infections per day:

(https://assets.nos.nl/data/image/2020/11/15/691783/1280x720a.jpg)

Number of patients in hospital:

(https://assets.nos.nl/data/image/2020/11/15/691784/1280x720a.jpg)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 15, 2020, 06:02:43 AM
It's very good to see a drop there. How we all wish this to come to an end ... (well, almost all: I've heard about a few not very social people allegedly enjoying the current, 'quieter' general environment, etc.)

Up here, the situation has stabilized somewhat, albeit still around 750 - 1100 infections per day for a couple of weeks, but also a very high number of tests (55,000 - 80,000 on a daily basis, in total now past 6 mio, with a population of 5.6 mio). We're hoping for the numbers to drop soon, but the autumn has generally seen an increase.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 16, 2020, 06:33:31 AM
Especially for states that succumbed to our toxic national political environment and failed to slow the spread of disease, that future is now. (https://thebulwark.com/the-grim-pandemic-outlook-for-fall-and-winter/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 16, 2020, 08:36:24 AM
Quote from: Que on November 15, 2020, 05:50:48 AM
Current situation in the Netherlands:

Number of newly registered infections per day:

(https://assets.nos.nl/data/image/2020/11/15/691783/1280x720a.jpg)

Number of patients in hospital:

(https://assets.nos.nl/data/image/2020/11/15/691784/1280x720a.jpg)

Good to see numbers going down in Netherlands. In Finland that's not the case:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 16, 2020, 09:17:13 AM
These five charts show how COVID-19 is making a comeback in Mass. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/05/nation/5-charts-that-tell-story-covid-19-mass/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 16, 2020, 10:49:21 AM
Just 1 month ago cases here in Maine averaged just 28.4/day. Now we are averaging 179/day. Granted still low numbers compared to the rest of the U.S. but we've been very fortunate. Our luck may be running out though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 16, 2020, 11:02:25 AM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 16, 2020, 10:49:21 AM
Just 1 month ago cases here in Maine averaged just 28.4/day. Now we are averaging 179/day. Granted still low numbers compared to the rest of the U.S. but we've been very fortunate. Our luck may be running out though.

Ulster County, NY cases are increasing, details on https://covid19.ulstercountyny.gov/dashboard/
Already seeing isolated closings (dine-in restaurants, flea markets). I have a feeling that a lot of "Phase 4" businesses (last ones to reopen), e.g. gyms, malls, eat-in restaurants, are likely to get shut down again in the near future. Conceivably even some "Phase 3".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 16, 2020, 11:22:35 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 16, 2020, 11:02:25 AM
Ulster County, NY cases are increasing, details on https://covid19.ulstercountyny.gov/dashboard/
Already seeing isolated closings (dine-in restaurants, flea markets). I have a feeling that a lot of "Phase 4" businesses (last ones to reopen), e.g. gyms, malls, eat-in restaurants, are likely to get shut down again in the near future. Conceivably even some "Phase 3".
I have a friend that works out at a local gym in Ulster County(Kingston) and she's going to have a fit if things shut down again. Meanwhile I've been back at the gym here in Maine just over 2 months after being away for nearly 6 mos. due to covid.  The possibility of things closing down again is not lost on me. Ugh.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on November 16, 2020, 06:19:15 PM
Quote
Covid-19 patients often "don't want to believe that Covid is real."

"Their last dying words are, 'This can't be happening. It's not real.' And when they should be... Facetiming their families, they're filled with anger and hatred."


Sad, frustrating, hard to believe...

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/526204-south-dakota-nurse-says-many-dying-patients-still-insist-covid-19-not (https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/526204-south-dakota-nurse-says-many-dying-patients-still-insist-covid-19-not)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on November 17, 2020, 05:32:25 AM
I have read several polls that show the vast majority of Americans believe the virus is real and wear masks.

I live in Fairfax, Virginia and I rarely see anyone who does not wear a mask (70% of the county voted for Bien.).

The minority that refuses to wear masks and acknowledge the disease risk the health of all of us and makes us look like fools to the rest of the world  :( 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 17, 2020, 06:46:58 AM
Quote from: Tom 1960 on November 16, 2020, 10:49:21 AM
Just 1 month ago cases here in Maine averaged just 28.4/day. Now we are averaging 179/day. Granted still low numbers compared to the rest of the U.S. but we've been very fortunate. Our luck may be running out though.

Here in Vermont we are seeing a similar surge. A month ago new cases averaged in the single digits. Yesterday we tallied 122 new cases, a record, and have consistently been seeing numbers in excess of 40 per day over the last 2 weeks.

Vermont has a population under 1 million people so those numbers may seem less alarming than they should.

Most alarmingly for me personally, my county, which since the start of the pandemic was virtually untouched by the virus, is now the epicenter of the current surge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 17, 2020, 11:57:34 AM
245 cases here today another record.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on November 17, 2020, 11:59:35 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 17, 2020, 06:46:58 AM
Here in Vermont we are seeing a similar surge. A month ago new cases averaged in the single digits. Yesterday we tallied 122 new cases, a record, and have consistently been seeing numbers in excess of 40 per day over the last 2 weeks.

Vermont has a population under 1 million people so those numbers may seem less alarming than they should.

Most alarmingly for me personally, my county, which since the start of the pandemic was virtually untouched by the virus, is now the epicenter of the current surge.
My wife works as a nurse at a assisted living facility a short drive away. So far there have been zero cases at the facility. With the large influx of cases recently you have to wonder how much longer that streak will stay intact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on November 18, 2020, 03:13:02 AM
Quote from: André on November 16, 2020, 06:19:15 PM

Sad, frustrating, hard to believe...

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/526204-south-dakota-nurse-says-many-dying-patients-still-insist-covid-19-not (https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/526204-south-dakota-nurse-says-many-dying-patients-still-insist-covid-19-not)

The article is very depressing.  The vast majority of the United States believe the virus is real.  It seems that there is a large minority that are in denial.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 18, 2020, 08:07:09 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 18, 2020, 06:14:00 AM
At this point we have uncontrolled spread and there is basically nothing that can be done but pray the vaccine works.

I have seen this statement made before, but I have never seen it supported with evidence or reasoned logic. "Uncontrolled" doesn't mean "uncontrollable". There are things that can be done to REGAIN control of the pandemic, but they require massive amounts of surveillance testing, exhaustive contact tracing for all positive cases, universal masking, frequent hand washing, and all the recommended public health measures.

The reason we are in this situation is largely because people have not been careful enough in their mitigation efforts, in fact some have openly defied all of the recommendations. And now exposure is magnified due to the fraction of time spent indoors.

China took control of an out-of-control situation, so it CAN be done... the question is whether we have the will to do it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 18, 2020, 08:31:09 AM

     Immunity to the Coronavirus May Last Years, New Data Hint (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/health/coronavirus-immunity.html)

The findings are likely to come as a relief to experts worried that immunity to the virus might be short-lived, and that vaccines might have to be administered repeatedly to keep the pandemic under control.

And the research squares with another recent finding: that survivors of SARS, caused by another coronavirus, still carry certain important immune cells 17 years after recovering.

The findings are consistent with encouraging evidence emerging from other labs. Researchers at the University of Washington, led by the immunologist Marion Pepper, had earlier shown that certain "memory" cells that were produced following infection with the coronavirus persist for at least three months in the body.

A study published last week also found that people who have recovered from Covid-19 have powerful and protective killer immune cells even when antibodies are not detectable.

These studies "are all by and large painting the same picture, which is that once you get past those first few critical weeks, the rest of the response looks pretty conventional," said Deepta Bhattacharya, an immunologist at the University of Arizona.

Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University, said she was not surprised that the body mounts a long-lasting response because "that's what is supposed to happen." Still, she was heartened by the research: "This is exciting news."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 18, 2020, 09:51:25 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 18, 2020, 08:31:09 AM
     Immunity to the Coronavirus May Last Years, New Data Hint (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/health/coronavirus-immunity.html)

The findings are likely to come as a relief to experts worried that immunity to the virus might be short-lived, and that vaccines might have to be administered repeatedly to keep the pandemic under control.

And the research squares with another recent finding: that survivors of SARS, caused by another coronavirus, still carry certain important immune cells 17 years after recovering.

The findings are consistent with encouraging evidence emerging from other labs. Researchers at the University of Washington, led by the immunologist Marion Pepper, had earlier shown that certain "memory" cells that were produced following infection with the coronavirus persist for at least three months in the body.

A study published last week also found that people who have recovered from Covid-19 have powerful and protective killer immune cells even when antibodies are not detectable.

These studies "are all by and large painting the same picture, which is that once you get past those first few critical weeks, the rest of the response looks pretty conventional," said Deepta Bhattacharya, an immunologist at the University of Arizona.

Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University, said she was not surprised that the body mounts a long-lasting response because "that's what is supposed to happen." Still, she was heartened by the research: "This is exciting news."


I consider that highly encouraging.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 19, 2020, 08:45:43 AM
Good account of the Cheeto administration's dumpster fire:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-19/trump-team-promises-hospital-beds-without-moving-to-slow-virus

Too many highlights to quote.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 19, 2020, 09:56:18 AM

     Over 900 Mayo Clinic staff in Midwest have contracted COVID-19 in past 2 weeks (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/900-mayo-clinic-staff-midwest-contracted-covid-19/story?id=74280544)

Most of the exposure -- about 93% -- happened in the community, not at work, Williams said.

"It shows how widely spread this is in our communities, and how easy it is to get COVID-19 in the communities here in the Midwest," Williams said.

Across the Midwest, about 1,500 Mayo Clinic employees have work restrictions due to COVID-19 exposure, diagnosis or having to care for family members who are sick, officials said. About 1,000 of those are at the Mayo Clinic's campus in Rochester, Minnesota.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2020, 01:37:52 PM
I think this is good news


https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine

QuotePrimary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group

Efficacy was consistent across age, gender, race and ethnicity demographics; observed efficacy in adults over 65 years of age was over 94%

Safety data milestone required by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) has been achieved

Data demonstrate vaccine was well tolerated across all populations with over 43,000 participants enrolled; no serious safety concerns observed; the only Grade 3 adverse event greater than 2% in frequency was fatigue at 3.8% and headache at 2.0%

Companies plan to submit within days to the FDA for EUA and share data with other regulatory agencies around the globe

The companies expect to produce globally up to 50 million vaccine doses in 2020 and up to 1.3 billion doses by the end of 2021

Pfizer is confident in its vast experience, expertise and existing cold-chain infrastructure to distribute the vaccine around the world
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 19, 2020, 01:56:09 PM
Quote from: drogulus on November 19, 2020, 09:56:18 AM
     Over 900 Mayo Clinic staff in Midwest have contracted COVID-19 in past 2 weeks (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/900-mayo-clinic-staff-midwest-contracted-covid-19/story?id=74280544)

Most of the exposure -- about 93% -- happened in the community, not at work, Williams said.

"It shows how widely spread this is in our communities, and how easy it is to get COVID-19 in the communities here in the Midwest," Williams said.

Across the Midwest, about 1,500 Mayo Clinic employees have work restrictions due to COVID-19 exposure, diagnosis or having to care for family members who are sick, officials said. About 1,000 of those are at the Mayo Clinic's campus in Rochester, Minnesota.




Yowch!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 19, 2020, 03:29:13 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-20/who-advises-doctors-not-to-use-gilead-s-remdesivir-for-covid-19

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-19/tyson-suspends-workers-after-lawsuits-allege-covid-betting-pool
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 20, 2020, 08:35:49 AM
More superspreading:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/20/covid-19-son-of-trump-lawyer-rudy-giuliani-has-coronavirus.html

Ghouliani the younger.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 20, 2020, 11:06:42 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-11-20/fda-s-remdesivir-fail-is-a-warning-for-pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines

Less than a month ago, the Food and Drug Administration said hospitals could use remdesivir, a drug manufactured by Gilead Sciences Inc., to treat patients with Covid-19. Remdesivir, sold under the brand name Veklury, was said to shorten recovery times and reduce the need for ventilators to facilitate breathing. Yesterday, the World Health Organization hit the brakes: It recommended that doctors avoid using the drug altogether.

"There is currently no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients," the WHO noted, citing detailed studies it sponsored. "The evidence suggested no important effect on mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, time to clinical improvement, and other patient-important outcomes."

...
Perhaps it was just fine that the FDA relied on what was essentially an in-house trial to approve remdesivir and that Hahn has been unusually amenable to Trump's demands for approving sketchy Covid-19 treatments. And perhaps it's fine that Alex Azar, a former pharmaceutical executive and Big Pharma lobbyist who is a Trump loyalist, runs HHS and supervises Hahn.

In case any of this isn't fine, we should bear it in mind as HHS and the FDA continue to play pivotal roles overseeing the approval, rollout and regulation of more crucial drugs: the Covid-19 vaccines that Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc. have put on the table.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 20, 2020, 02:15:26 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-20/donald-trump-jr-infected-by-coronavirus-and-in-isolation

President Donald Trump's oldest son, Donald Trump Jr., tested positive for coronavirus infection earlier this week and is isolating, according to three people familiar with the matter.

A spokesman for Trump Jr. said in a statement he is asymptomatic for Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus.


Trump Jr. adds to the dozens of people associated with the president who have been infected by the virus, including Trump himself. On Friday, Rudy Giuliani's son Andrew Giuliani, who is a White House aide, announced on Twitter he had tested positive. In addition, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence, Hannah McInnis, tested positive earlier this month, according to two people familiar with the matter.


Several of Pence's aides have been infected, including his press secretary and chief of staff. Pence himself has not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 20, 2020, 03:02:43 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 20, 2020, 02:15:26 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-20/donald-trump-jr-infected-by-coronavirus-and-in-isolation

President Donald Trump's oldest son, Donald Trump Jr., tested positive for coronavirus infection earlier this week and is isolating, according to three people familiar with the matter.

A spokesman for Trump Jr. said in a statement he is asymptomatic for Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus.


Trump Jr. adds to the dozens of people associated with the president who have been infected by the virus, including Trump himself. On Friday, Rudy Giuliani's son Andrew Giuliani, who is a White House aide, announced on Twitter he had tested positive. In addition, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence, Hannah McInnis, tested positive earlier this month, according to two people familiar with the matter.


Several of Pence's aides have been infected, including his press secretary and chief of staff. Pence himself has not.


But remember that the virus isn't really a big deal. ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 21, 2020, 07:55:38 AM

     Yesterday I went to Osco pharmacy to pick up a prescription and I asked if they would be providing the Covid vaccine when it became available to the general public. The pharmacist said they would.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 21, 2020, 08:03:30 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on November 20, 2020, 03:02:43 PM
But remember that the virus isn't really a big deal. ::)

Yeah, it's just a hoax by liberals who want to tell us what to do and take our guns away! LET'S GET REAL!
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/Herman_Cain_by_Gage_Skidmore_4.jpg/220px-Herman_Cain_by_Gage_Skidmore_4.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 21, 2020, 03:01:10 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/21/many-gop-lawmakers-disobeying-mask-wearing-rules-in-their-own-capitols.html

Efforts to require lawmakers and staff to wear masks have received a cool reception even in statehouses that have seen outbreaks of the virus.
Nearly 200 legislators nationwide have tested positive for the virus and four have died from COVID-19 since the pandemic began, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press.
After at least four dozen Mississippi lawmakers tested positive in the largest outbreak in a legislature, where masks were encouraged but not required for lawmakers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 21, 2020, 06:17:16 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 21, 2020, 08:03:30 AM
Yeah, it's just a hoax by liberals who want to tell us to do and take our guns away! LET'S GET REAL!
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/Herman_Cain_by_Gage_Skidmore_4.jpg/220px-Herman_Cain_by_Gage_Skidmore_4.jpg)

That's right. The Republicans completely downplayed Cain's death due to COVID and Trump continued to hold those massive rallies anyway. The irresponsibility of this party is quite frankly appalling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 24, 2020, 11:23:44 AM
Regarding the 'old' mink story here: the cluster-5 mutated virus seems to have died out, that's the initial conclusion here. So the drastic restrictions in Northern Jutland  have been lifted somewhat. Our minister of the sector was fired, because the authorities hadn't checked enough about the legal background for culling the mink industry before doing it, and he was then blamed for it, symbolically. But mink have shown to be extremely easily infected and for the virus to mutate in, so the decision to cull the mink population is considered basically right here, though some speak for some kind of preservation of at least a population of them. But almost all have been culled now.

Also, similar problems with mink appear in many other countries; in Russia, they are even working on a vaccine for mink. A few local mink farmers in Denmark talk about moving their industry abroad. But it's a part of the story, that mink haven't really been profitable business in Denmark for about 5 years or so, cheaper products from abroad taking over. Before that, it was very profitable, and it seems to be an industry that has gone up and down a lot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 24, 2020, 11:32:24 PM
............. and generally lots of good news about oncoming approvals of vaccines, a more wide-spread use of them probably beginning to take place in early 2021. A thorough general herd immunity effect should probably be possible, when about 50-60 % of the population have taken vaccines, but factors like their efficiency and the respond to them matter too. However, chances are good that things should be pretty much back to normal in the late summer or early autumn of 2021, almost everyone says. But the virus will probably not disappear, with regular vaccinations therefore being necessary.

  A lot of industries, including aviation, have begun talking about personal vaccine proofs that would enable and promote further mobility and travels for those taking a vaccine.

  Here in DK, the number of infected is expected to rise in the winter, with hospitals preparing for it. In spite of further restrictions, and a relatively stable situation for a few weeks, with around 800 - 1300 daily infections; we might reach 2000 a day, they say. One hopes not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 25, 2020, 05:22:45 AM
Europe was largest contributor to new Covid-19 cases and deaths in the past week, WHO says (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/25/europe/europe-coronavirus-deaths-holidays-intl/index.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 25, 2020, 05:47:43 AM
Swedish Life Expectancy to Drop for First Time in Century Due to Covid-19 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-25/swedish-life-expectancy-set-to-drop-due-to-pandemic-agency-says)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 25, 2020, 07:44:30 AM
Looks like Ghouliani may have done some superspreading. Not just of melted hair dye. :o :laugh:
(https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/106802351-1606317901493-2020-11-19T201940Z_308869622_RC2K6K9IMYKC_RTRMADP_3_USA-ELECTION-TRUMP.jpg?v=1606318025&w=740&h=416)
A top advisor to President Donald Trump's campaign said Wednesday that he has tested positive for the coronavirus, six days after attending a controversial press conference led by Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

The disclosure of the Covid-19 diagnosis by Boris Epshteyn came as Giuliani, the Trump lawyer who led that press conference, headed to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, for what was being called a hearing by the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on the state's election.

Giuliani's son Andrew, who also attended his father's press conference Thursday at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, revealed last Friday that he tested positive for the coronavirus. Andrew Giuliani is a White House special assistant to Trump.

The Gettysburg hearing comes a day after Pennsylvania certified its election results showing a win there for President-elect Joe Biden, the former Democratic vice president.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 26, 2020, 02:11:24 AM
Quote from: Todd on November 25, 2020, 05:47:43 AM
Swedish Life Expectancy to Drop for First Time in Century Due to Covid-19 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-25/swedish-life-expectancy-set-to-drop-due-to-pandemic-agency-says)

In the US life-expectancy has stagnated/dropped even before Covid-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 26, 2020, 06:21:12 AM
Culled mink rise from the dead to Denmark's horror (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/25/culled-mink-rise-from-the-dead-denmark-coronavirus)

Sound planning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 26, 2020, 12:02:27 PM
Quote from: Todd on November 26, 2020, 06:21:12 AM
Culled mink rise from the dead to Denmark's horror (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/25/culled-mink-rise-from-the-dead-denmark-coronavirus)

Sound planning.

Yes, extremely amateurish planning. We are some here (in Denmark), who don't understand, why the minks weren't cremated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on November 26, 2020, 04:16:39 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on November 26, 2020, 02:11:24 AM
In the US life-expectancy has stagnated/dropped even before Covid-19.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/amMXqTQdU7mxlkpYlb3TYbvtELo-6lWWdNCwbSsN60NurruMduJC0lmY0FEjTsxTdJI7bLnFAGk_IAPPIvOVRpf0cmGw4uuwAZ8lfQ22okgfvagrFvzmU55f9tsLAaXH8e_RWrSWIuIF-qtM9ZltH0ALqw8oAnrE_SA)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 27, 2020, 06:48:06 AM
Germany passes one million Covid-19 cases as Europe eases restrictions (https://www.euronews.com/2020/11/27/germany-passes-one-million-covid-19-cases-as-europe-eases-restrictions)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on November 27, 2020, 05:26:55 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on November 27, 2020, 03:18:39 PM
Whatever you tried to link, I get this error message:

Oops, sorry, just being silly.  It was just a Braveheart "Freedom!" meme.

https://www.google.com/search?q=braveheart+freedom!&oq=braveheart+freedom!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 28, 2020, 07:33:38 AM
A Chilling Question Divides Europe: Open Ski Slopes or Keep Them Closed?

Leading up to the Christmas season, France, Germany and Italy will keep slopes shut, but Austria and Switzerland have vowed to reopen theirs, in Europe's latest struggle to coordinate a pandemic response. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/27/world/europe/ski-resorts-covid.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 29, 2020, 02:50:13 PM
More Superspreader Chronicles from Cheeto Land:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/30/pennsylvania-lawmaker-gets-a-positive-covid-test-at-trump-meeting.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 29, 2020, 04:34:42 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 29, 2020, 02:50:13 PM
More Superspreader Chronicles from Cheeto Land:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/30/pennsylvania-lawmaker-gets-a-positive-covid-test-at-trump-meeting.html

Them as are determined not to learn, won't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 29, 2020, 04:41:52 PM
Or the proverbial "tax on the stupid".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 30, 2020, 05:24:44 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/controversial-white-house-coronavirus-advisor-scott-atlas-to-resign.html

Damn...I thought the Cheeto administration would have canonized him.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-30/tyson-accused-of-misleading-interpreters-at-virus-hit-iowa-plant

Tyson Foods Inc. is accused of giving incorrect information to interpreters during a Covid-19 outbreak that infected more than a third of workers at a pork plant in Waterloo, Iowa.

Plant management directed interpreters to tell the sizable non-English-speaking workforce that "everything is fine" at an April meeting, according to an amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of four workers who died. Managers also said county officials "cleared" the plant even though the Black Hawk County Health Department instead urged Tyson to close the facility to protect workers.

Workers were already testing positive by the time of the meetings in early April, with some 1,000 of its 2,800 workers eventually catching the virus, according to the complaint. One manager at the plant was earlier accused of betting on how many workers would be infected with the virus. He was later suspended.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 01, 2020, 10:34:18 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 30, 2020, 05:24:44 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/controversial-white-house-coronavirus-advisor-scott-atlas-to-resign.html

Damn...I thought the Cheeto administration would have canonized him.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-30/tyson-accused-of-misleading-interpreters-at-virus-hit-iowa-plant

Tyson Foods Inc. is accused of giving incorrect information to interpreters during a Covid-19 outbreak that infected more than a third of workers at a pork plant in Waterloo, Iowa.

Plant management directed interpreters to tell the sizable non-English-speaking workforce that "everything is fine" at an April meeting, according to an amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of four workers who died. Managers also said county officials "cleared" the plant even though the Black Hawk County Health Department instead urged Tyson to close the facility to protect workers.

Workers were already testing positive by the time of the meetings in early April, with some 1,000 of its 2,800 workers eventually catching the virus, according to the complaint. One manager at the plant was earlier accused of betting on how many workers would be infected with the virus. He was later suspended.

I had heard the news about the betting:  disgusting and deplorable to say the least!  >:(  Further shocked to hear all of the other news.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 01, 2020, 10:47:46 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 01, 2020, 10:34:18 AM
I had heard the news about the betting:  disgusting and deplorable to say the least!  >:(  Further shocked to hear all of the other news.

PD

The working conditions in meat (and poultry) packing plants in the US have steadily deteriorated and have been a disgrace for years. There's of course a political component that one could research. The jobs are so awful that they're mainly taken by immigrants (legal and otherwise). The COVID disasters were widely predicted, incl. by yours truly, but no credit because it was really obvious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 01, 2020, 11:27:46 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 01, 2020, 10:47:46 AM
The working conditions in meat (and poultry) packing plants in the US have steadily deteriorated and have been a disgrace for years. There's of course a political component that one could research. The jobs are so awful that they're mainly taken by immigrants (legal and otherwise). The COVID disasters were widely predicted, incl. by yours truly, but no credit because it was really obvious.

The situation is not unique to the US. Meat packing plants have a bad reputation the world over for their work and sanitary conditions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 01, 2020, 02:13:18 PM
Many vegetarians got their start by taking a not-especially-hard look at the meat-processing industry.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on December 01, 2020, 08:08:36 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 01, 2020, 02:13:18 PM
Many vegetarians got their start by taking a not-especially-hard look at the meat-processing industry.

And many became veggies when they assessed the environmental toll of meat production.

Today saw new death tolls at end-of April levels, but take heart: It's most likely just the coroners, back and refreshed from the holiday, catching up on the backlog.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 02, 2020, 12:40:30 AM
It is of course worth noting that now the UK has approved the Pfizer & Biontech vaccines very quickly, contrary to very pessimistic predictions earlier in the year, and that vaccinations should start in mid-December.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccine/uk-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-first-in-the-world-idUKKBN28C0OU

As a small side remark, the UK Reuters' wording, "Britain on Wednesday became the first western country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine, jumping ahead of the United States and Europe" is somewhat amusing for us fellow, but continental Europeans. I thought the distinction was mostly a thing of the past, but maybe Brexit has accentuated its everyday use again, consciously or unconsciously.

The US is likely to start vaccinations is mid-December too, reaching maybe even 35 mio people in the course of January, it is being said
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/trump-covid-vaccine-chief-says-everyone-in-us-could-be-immunized-by-june.html

And 1 mio Chinese have already received vaccinations from an experimental Sinopharm vaccine.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3110519/china-sinopharms-coronavirus-vaccine-taken-about-1-million
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 02, 2020, 06:08:15 AM
Covid-19 situation has been getting worse in Finland. Now 408 deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 02, 2020, 06:47:50 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 02, 2020, 06:08:15 AM
Covid-19 situation has been getting worse in Finland. Now 408 deaths.

The virus is playing catch up in previously little affected countries or regions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 02, 2020, 07:02:03 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 02, 2020, 12:40:30 AM
"Britain on Wednesday became the first western country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine, jumping ahead of the United States and Europe".

From BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55145696) -

"The Pfizer/BioNTech jab is the fastest vaccine to go from concept to reality, taking only 10 months to follow the same steps that normally span 10 years".

"An mRNA vaccine has never been approved for use in humans before, although people have received them in clinical trials".

The wife and I, not having any underlying health conditions like diabetes, obesity or history of taking pharmaceutical drugs, will not be volunteering to take the vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 02, 2020, 09:13:25 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 02, 2020, 07:02:03 AM
From BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55145696) -

"The Pfizer/BioNTech jab is the fastest vaccine to go from concept to reality, taking only 10 months to follow the same steps that normally span 10 years".

"An mRNA vaccine has never been approved for use in humans before, although people have received them in clinical trials".

The wife and I, not having any underlying health conditions like diabetes, obesity or history of taking pharmaceutical drugs, will not be volunteering to take the vaccine.
I heard the news this morning about Britain giving the go-ahead.

Like you, I'm wondering whether or not there could be any long-term problems from using a mRNA vaccine?  Thoughts anyone?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2020, 09:32:55 AM
Hope it is not the institutional impatience that it seems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 02, 2020, 10:33:27 AM
Quote from: André on December 02, 2020, 06:47:50 AM
The virus is playing catch up in previously little affected countries or regions.

True. Vermont saw 3 deaths in one day for the first time yesterday... bringing our total death toll to 72. (But it's a small state, with fewer than 1 million people... and the virus is definitely surging here, with dozens, and often >100, new cases every day now.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 02, 2020, 10:37:06 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 02, 2020, 09:32:55 AM
Hope it is not the institutional impatience that it seems.

I would have the jab tomorrow if available.

My criticism is the roll-out. Told, I do not know if true, that the French will prioritise workers coming into contact with the general public, for example taxi-drivers and shop-workers etc. This seems to me to be the most sensible route in returning  to normal life. Johnson has announced the first group, as early as next week, is the most vulnerable, the over-80s and the staff who care for them will receive the vaccine. Then a sliding scale downwards according to age. The problem for me is that the entire retired (including myself) population will be vaccinated but the most important in fiscal terms who we all rely in saving the economy from the present serious situation will not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 02, 2020, 01:41:42 PM
COVID cases in my county (Ulster, NY) just sailed past the previous peak, exponential growth, no signs of slowdown.

(https://external-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQBPGg1SAmGO3Uqv&w=500&h=261&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com%2Fdailyfreeman.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2Fd%2Fd9%2Fdd9cdeee-34cd-11eb-b0f9-373583a36145%2F5fc7e01c48714.image.jpg%3Fresize%3D622%252C630&cfs=1&ext=jpg&_nc_cb=1&_nc_hash=AQCVz6LNkOV95thm)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on December 02, 2020, 03:03:43 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 02, 2020, 01:41:42 PM
COVID cases in my county (Ulster, NY) just sailed past the previous peak, exponential growth, no signs of slowdown.

(https://external-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQBPGg1SAmGO3Uqv&w=500&h=261&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com%2Fdailyfreeman.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2Fd%2Fd9%2Fdd9cdeee-34cd-11eb-b0f9-373583a36145%2F5fc7e01c48714.image.jpg%3Fresize%3D622%252C630&cfs=1&ext=jpg&_nc_cb=1&_nc_hash=AQCVz6LNkOV95thm)

That's really bad for such a small county.  Here's San Diego County, which is at least 10 times more populous:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2020, 04:13:19 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 02, 2020, 01:41:42 PM
COVID cases in my county (Ulster, NY) just sailed past the previous peak, exponential growth, no signs of slowdown.

(https://external-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQBPGg1SAmGO3Uqv&w=500&h=261&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com%2Fdailyfreeman.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2Fd%2Fd9%2Fdd9cdeee-34cd-11eb-b0f9-373583a36145%2F5fc7e01c48714.image.jpg%3Fresize%3D622%252C630&cfs=1&ext=jpg&_nc_cb=1&_nc_hash=AQCVz6LNkOV95thm)

Wrong direction here, too: Coronavirus Now: Mass. reports 4,613 new cases — the highest single-day total so far
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 03, 2020, 03:14:11 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 02, 2020, 01:41:42 PM
COVID cases in my county (Ulster, NY) just sailed past the previous peak, exponential growth, no signs of slowdown.

(https://external-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQBPGg1SAmGO3Uqv&w=500&h=261&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com%2Fdailyfreeman.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2Fd%2Fd9%2Fdd9cdeee-34cd-11eb-b0f9-373583a36145%2F5fc7e01c48714.image.jpg%3Fresize%3D622%252C630&cfs=1&ext=jpg&_nc_cb=1&_nc_hash=AQCVz6LNkOV95thm)
Yeah, I've had CNN on (a lot lately).  It's hard to hear the news over and over about the growth rate and the deaths.   :(

Meanwhile, it's holiday 'party-time' at the White House.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 03, 2020, 04:10:04 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 03, 2020, 03:14:11 AM
Meanwhile, it's holiday 'party-time' at the White House.  ::)

And Bernie Sanders is attacked for wanting $2K stimulus for people...  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 03, 2020, 07:15:50 AM
Scary to read this article about hackers attacking the cold-supply chain and intelligence gathering efforts:

"Officials suggested the activity so far had been about intelligence gathering rather than disruption of any research."

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55165552

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 03, 2020, 08:50:09 AM
The UK government education secretary has explained on BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55175162) that the best medicines regulatory agency is the one that approves a vaccine the fastest. :-\

Mr Williamson said: "I just reckon we've got the very best people in this country and we've obviously got the best medical regulator, much better than the French have, much better than the Belgians have, much better than the Americans have.

"That doesn't surprise me at all, because we're a much better country than every single one of them."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 03, 2020, 10:09:36 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 03, 2020, 08:50:09 AM
The UK government education secretary has explained on BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55175162) that the best medicines regulatory agency is the one that approves a vaccine the fastest. :-\

Mr Williamson said: "I just reckon we've got the very best people in this country and we've obviously got the best medical regulator, much better than the French have, much better than the Belgians have, much better than the Americans have.

"That doesn't surprise me at all, because we're a much better country than every single one of them."


Well, there you go!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on December 03, 2020, 01:37:49 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 03, 2020, 08:50:09 AM
The UK government education secretary has explained on BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55175162) that the best medicines regulatory agency is the one that approves a vaccine the fastest. :-\

Mr Williamson said: "I just reckon we've got the very best people in this country and we've obviously got the best medical regulator, much better than the French have, much better than the Belgians have, much better than the Americans have.

"That doesn't surprise me at all, because we're a much better country than every single one of them."


Just embarassingly idiotic. : ( 

Hardly a unique case of crassness from him either. That people like him with no feel or vision for their job ascend to such heights, is a depressing symptom of the political system.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 03, 2020, 01:55:13 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 03, 2020, 08:50:09 AM
The UK government education secretary has explained on BBC News (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55175162) that the best medicines regulatory agency is the one that approves a vaccine the fastest. :-\

Mr Williamson said: "I just reckon we've got the very best people in this country and we've obviously got the best medical regulator, much better than the French have, much better than the Belgians have, much better than the Americans have.

"That doesn't surprise me at all, because we're a much better country than every single one of them."


A prat. How on earth could he say such a stupid thing!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 05, 2020, 06:22:53 AM
Hancock not only says stupid things, he also tells lies about the approval process to glorify Brexit:

"Because of Brexit we've been able to make a decision [to approve the Pfizer vaccine] based on the UK regulator, a world class regulator, and not go at the pace of the Europeans who are moving a little bit more slowly. We do all the same safety checks and the same processes, but we've been able to speed up how they're done because of Brexit."

Matt Hancock, Times Radio, 2 December 2020.


This is not correct. Under European law, the UK was permitted to act independently to approve the vaccine in an emergency.

https://fullfact.org/health/coronavirus-vaccine-brexit/

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 06, 2020, 01:32:15 AM
Quote from: Que on December 05, 2020, 06:22:53 AM
Hancock not only says stupid things, he also tells lies about the approval process to glorify Brexit:

"Because of Brexit we've been able to make a decision [to approve the Pfizer vaccine] based on the UK regulator, a world class regulator, and not go at the pace of the Europeans who are moving a little bit more slowly. We do all the same safety checks and the same processes, but we've been able to speed up how they're done because of Brexit."

Matt Hancock, Times Radio, 2 December 2020.


This is not correct. Under European law, the UK was permitted to act independently to approve the vaccine in an emergency.

https://fullfact.org/health/coronavirus-vaccine-brexit/

Q

No need to glorify Brexit. Macron does not need assistance.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 06, 2020, 01:57:37 AM
Totally agree about Williamson's inane comment - what an idiot, especially after the A Level fiasco in the summer.
My concern is that governmental pressure may have been put on the UK regulator to rush the whole thing through - wouldn't surprise me - like the Iraq 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' deception.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 06, 2020, 11:52:02 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-06/giuliani-has-tested-positive-for-covid-19-trump-says
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/06/trump-says-rudy-giuliani-has-tested-positive-for-coronavirus.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 06, 2020, 12:09:49 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 06, 2020, 11:52:02 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-06/giuliani-has-tested-positive-for-covid-19-trump-says
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/06/trump-says-rudy-giuliani-has-tested-positive-for-coronavirus.html

- OK, if true, there were hints a few days ago, when people he met with were tested positive.

- More and more reports of the virus possibly originating much earlier than last December in Wuhan, with apparent finds already in the autumn in many regions in Italy, Spain, the UK, Sweden, France, the US etc., but not identified at the time. A team in Denmark will now try to compare possible, early finds with samples from the year before in detail, to try to establish more certain conclusions.

- Apparently China is also trying to downplay the role of Wuhan, but at least they've now allowed an international team to investigate the origins of the outbreak there.

- here in DK, the number of daily infections tends to rise to around 2000 per day, and the government has announced further restrictions to be presented tomorrow, to stop it. The opposition and in particular the established right-wing press is campaigning against the government to a higher degree now, using absolutely everything they can find, and involving a fair use of hyperboles, which at times can be a sad development to watch, IMO. But the new, serious statistics might lead to more political unity again, for a while.

- another Danish, big investigation has shown that the virus is about 5 times more deadly than the average flu.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Tom 1960 on December 07, 2020, 10:56:41 AM
Some people may smirk when I say this, but I was listening to Howard Stern this morning and he interviewed a ICU doctor who works in the Cleveland Clinic.  It was really was a fascinating interview in which he discussed what it was like working during the pandemic. The issues he was dealing with such as the staggering numbering of people dying on a daily basis. How he was dealing with that on a personal level. How his coworkers were handling things. Coworkers 2'nd guessing whether to continue in the profession. Dealing with burnout. Being overwhelmed. Having to intubate patients. Going out shopping afterwards and seeing people shopping maskless.  How he felt about the US government's  poor job handling of the crisis. I felt quite angry afterwards how this whole situation has become politicized and how some people refuse to deal with this issue in a very serious way. Say what you want about Howard Stern, but that was great radio this morning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 12:11:01 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/trump-to-sign-covid-19-vaccine-executive-order-prioritizing-americans.html

We don't believe in that mask-wearing crap, but by golly, we're gonna make sure all us Americans get vaccinated before any of them damn Euro-fags and denizens of shithole countries!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 07, 2020, 12:27:05 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 12:11:01 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/trump-to-sign-covid-19-vaccine-executive-order-prioritizing-americans.html

We don't believe in that mask-wearing crap, but by golly, we're gonna make sure all us Americans get vaccinated before any of them damn Euro-fags and denizens of shithole countries!

Do you think Biden will revoke it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 12:36:08 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 07, 2020, 12:27:05 PM
Do you think Biden will revoke it?

No idea. Perusing the text of the article, to which I defer out of ignorance:

CNBC has not reviewed the proposed text of the executive order, which could prove to be largely symbolic.
The official said that the timeline for providing foreign assistance will be shaped by supply and demand, but is anticipated to begin in the second quarter. President-elect Joe Biden will take office on Jan. 20 and is likely to shape his own policy for obtaining and distributing Covid-19 vaccines, possibly limiting the impact of Trump's order.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 07, 2020, 02:05:23 PM
From what I've seen here (at first glance), President-Elect Biden thinks that maybe he can't legally make it a mandate for all Americans to wear masks, but.....:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/17/joe-biden-i-cant-mandate-masks-except-federal-prop/

Any newer news?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 03:04:57 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/legislatures-postpone-work-after-rudy-giuliani-covid-diagnosis.html

The legislatures of Arizona and Michigan said that they would postpone work as a result of a positive coronavirus test for President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Giuliani appeared without a mask at sessions hosted by Republican lawmakers from both states as he promoted unfounded claims that Joe Biden won the presidential election because of ballot fraud.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 07, 2020, 05:38:45 PM
People need yo wear gas masks around Giuliani.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 05:50:14 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 07, 2020, 05:38:45 PM
People need yo wear gas masks around Giuliani.  :laugh:

Which raises an interesting question: Does flatus carry coronavirus?  :-[
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 07, 2020, 06:35:35 PM


     (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EolhBTdW8AQmebO?format=jpg&name=small)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 08, 2020, 10:45:02 AM
What seven ICU nurses want you to
know about the battle against covid-19 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/national/icu-nurses-covid-19/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F2d64af3%2F5fcfadae9d2fda0efb8267bd%2F5972fde29bbc0f1cdcef9ee3%2F9%2F69%2F5fcfadae9d2fda0efb8267bd)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on December 08, 2020, 11:21:32 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 05:50:14 PM
Which raises an interesting question: Does flatus carry coronavirus?  :-[

Apparently it does, 'cause the Barbie lawyer who accompanied Giuliani for looks and Godliness, has the virus too, now. She was right in the cloud.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 08, 2020, 01:20:07 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 07, 2020, 05:50:14 PM
Which raises an interesting question: Does flatus carry coronavirus?  :-[

MusicIan423 says it well in Youtube (https://youtu.be/FlcnwR6qdis) comment section:

"While we know the virus sheds through the nose and mouth... We have discovered that most spreading of covid comes from assholes"

So true! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 08, 2020, 01:24:35 PM
More analysis here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/04/27/can-farts-transmit-covid-19-coronavirus-here-is-what-is-being-said/?sh=3e536c44310f
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 08, 2020, 02:32:01 PM
They "had a blast" writing that article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2020, 04:08:05 AM
Warning about the Pfizer vaccine:

"People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.
It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.
The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said."

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 09, 2020, 05:03:40 AM
Don't look now, but...

China State-Backed Covid Vaccine Has 86% Efficacy, UAE Says

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/09/coronavirus-live-updates.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-09/uae-says-sinopharm-vaccine-has-86-efficacy-against-covid-19

UAE says China's Covid vaccine from Sinopharm is 86% effective in its trials
Phase 3 human trials of a Chinese vaccine in the United Arab Emirates have yielded an 86% efficacy rate, the UAE's Ministry of Health said. The UAE's Phase 3 trials included 31,000 volunteers across 125 nationalities between ages 18 and 60.

The announcement cited an "interim analysis" conducted by Sinopharm's China National Biotec Group (CNBG), whose Beijing Institute of Biological Product unit developed the vaccine itself. The Gulf state of 10 million people began Phase 3 human trials of the experimental vaccine in July, and in September approved its emergency use for health workers. Several high-ranking UAE officials, including the Dubai's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum, have taken the vaccine.

The ministry stated that "the analysis shows no serious safety concerns," but its release left out several details, including information on how many patients were given the vaccine dosage versus placebos, and whether patients experienced any side effects.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 09, 2020, 06:39:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2020, 04:08:05 AM
Warning about the Pfizer vaccine:

"People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.
It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.
The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said."

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122

Comparable allergic results to those of Marmite, P. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2020, 09:29:29 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 09, 2020, 06:39:09 AM
Comparable allergic results to those of Marmite, P.
I hadn't realized that people could be allergic to Marmite Irons (had to remind myself what it is made out of)?  I see that it's yeast.

Have you heard anything about doctors suggesting that certain people wait and have a different vaccine instead?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 09, 2020, 10:45:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2020, 09:29:29 AM
I hadn't realized that people could be allergic to Marmite Irons (had to remind myself what it is made out of)?  I see that it's yeast.

Have you heard anything about doctors suggesting that certain people wait and have a different vaccine instead?

PD

Not yet, P. The big concern is the anti-vaccine brigade who already had a base with the mumps vaccine for children which was an issue before the Covid crises. I find it irresponsible for parents to refuse that their children to be inoculated due to unsubstantiated so called risks, then if their child falls ill to expect the NHS cure the child of mumps or similar at the cost of the taxpayer.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 09, 2020, 11:04:18 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-09/which-countries-have-reserved-the-most-covid-19-vaccines-u-s-is-32nd-on-list

Might be paywalled.

The U.S. Operation Warp Speed program is credited with shaving years off the typical development timeline for vaccines that are now on the brink of being deployed. But after leading that effort, the U.S. has yet to exercise some options to lock down additional supplies that could offer extra insurance against manufacturing problems or scientific delays.

Bloomberg has reviewed more than 80 agreements between vaccine makers and countries around the globe to reserve allocations while they are still in development. Canada, the U.K. and Australia top the list, with enough vaccine doses reserved to cover their populations several times over.

The U.S., meanwhile, ranks 32nd in per-capita vaccine reservations. It is behind the 27 European Union countries that banded together to pre-order vaccines in larger quantities, and sandwiched between Chile and Japan in 31st and 33rd, respectively, according to Bloomberg's analysis.

"On any dimension you want to talk about, it's a shocking abdication of government responsibility," said Craig Garthwaite, the Director of the Program on Healthcare at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. "I'm so demoralized this will delay by another month or two getting the economy going."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 09, 2020, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 09, 2020, 11:04:18 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-09/which-countries-have-reserved-the-most-covid-19-vaccines-u-s-is-32nd-on-list

Might be paywalled.

The U.S. Operation Warp Speed program is credited with shaving years off the typical development timeline for vaccines that are now on the brink of being deployed. But after leading that effort, the U.S. has yet to exercise some options to lock down additional supplies that could offer extra insurance against manufacturing problems or scientific delays.

Bloomberg has reviewed more than 80 agreements between vaccine makers and countries around the globe to reserve allocations while they are still in development. Canada, the U.K. and Australia top the list, with enough vaccine doses reserved to cover their populations several times over.

The U.S., meanwhile, ranks 32nd in per-capita vaccine reservations. It is behind the 27 European Union countries that banded together to pre-order vaccines in larger quantities, and sandwiched between Chile and Japan in 31st and 33rd, respectively, according to Bloomberg's analysis.

"On any dimension you want to talk about, it's a shocking abdication of government responsibility," said Craig Garthwaite, the Director of the Program on Healthcare at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. "I'm so demoralized this will delay by another month or two getting the economy going."


To the bolded text: some countries have tried to avoid a repeat of the mishaps that marred the distribution of protection equipment in the spring and left them waiting for cargo that were 'hijacked'  by a higher bidder. The recent move by Trump on vaccine distribution was widely anticipated in some capitals. The vaccine orders are not necessarily redundant, as the bulk of them are options for additional orders - just in case an expected order would be 'rerouted' somewhere else...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2020, 12:19:26 PM
Quote from: Irons on December 09, 2020, 10:45:56 AM
Not yet, P. The big concern is the anti-vaccine brigade who already had a base with the mumps vaccine for children which was an issue before the Covid crises. I find it irresponsible for parents to refuse that their children to be inoculated due to unsubstantiated so called risks, then if their child falls ill to expect the NHS cure the child of mumps or similar at the cost of the taxpayer.   
I understand your feelings Irons.  Here, there are a number of people from various backgrounds who refuse to get their children inoculated for either so-called 'scientific findings' (which aren't true = rumors) or religious reasons and are causing previously controlable illnesses to spread and go skyrocketing in some areas.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 10, 2020, 04:01:20 AM
Poll in Finland: Are you taking the vaccine when available?

YES 64 %
CAN'T SAY YET 16 %
NO 20 %

Quote from: T. D. on December 09, 2020, 11:04:18 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-09/which-countries-have-reserved-the-most-covid-19-vaccines-u-s-is-32nd-on-list

Might be paywalled.

Fortunately not paywalled.  :) Canada is doing so great in this vaccine thing!  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 10, 2020, 12:59:58 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 10, 2020, 04:01:20 AM
Poll in Finland: Are you taking the vaccine when available?

YES 64 %
CAN'T SAY YET 16 %
NO 20 %

Shows that Fins are not smarter than anyone else..... ::)

Score for the Netherlands: 73% - 18% - 8%
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 10, 2020, 01:17:50 PM
Quote from: Que on December 10, 2020, 12:59:58 PM
Shows that Fins are not smarter than anyone else..... ::)

Score for the Netherlands: 73% - 18% - 8%

Danish score:

Yes                80%
No                 10%
Don't know     10%
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 10, 2020, 01:22:12 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 10, 2020, 01:17:50 PM
Danish score:

Yes                80%
No                 10%
Don't know     10%

Danes are obviously smart!   :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 10, 2020, 01:52:33 PM
Might I venture a guess as to where the dumbass USA ranks on that scale?  :laugh:

On that subject...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-10/cdc-chief-says-he-told-staff-to-ignore-email-from-trump-official

The head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said he told staff to ignore an email by a top Trump administration health official who had sought changes to a scientific report on Covid-19's risk to children.

The email i[n] question was written by Paul Alexander, a senior adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar. Charlotte Kent, the editor of the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, told congressional investigators that while on vacation in August she received instructions to delete the email.

"I instructed CDC to ignore Dr. Alexander's comments," CDC Director Robert Redfield said Thursday at a virtual event held by the Council on Foreign Relations. He also said he instructed staff that they didn't need to reply to the message. "I would never delete an email," he said.

The comments came in response to allegations Thursday from Representative James E. Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat and head of a congressional oversight subcommittee. In a letter to Redfield and Azar, Clyburn said the Trump administration had attempted to "destroy evidence that senior political appointees interfered with career officials' response to the coronavirus crisis" at the CDC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 10, 2020, 03:49:23 PM
Quote from: Que on December 10, 2020, 12:59:58 PM
Shows that Fins are not smarter than anyone else..... ::)

Certainly not. That Finnish poll is nothing to brag about. One explanation for these numbers is the vaccine Finland got for swine flu decade ago caused many Finns to get narcolepsy as a nasty side effect. It was really bad and compromised the trust for vaccines among Finns. Many believe that in the end more Finns will want the corona vaccine when it has (hopefully) shown to be safe.

Quote from: Que on December 10, 2020, 12:59:58 PM
Score for the Netherlands: 73% - 18% - 8%

Pretty damn good numbers. I suppose Netherlands did not have narcolepsy problem with swine flu vaccinations?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 10, 2020, 03:55:35 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 10, 2020, 01:52:33 PM
Might I venture a guess as to where the dumbass USA ranks on that scale?  :laugh:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/327425/willingness-covid-vaccine-ticks.aspx

YES 63 %
NO 37 %

Apparently there was no "no opinion yet" option.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 11, 2020, 01:26:51 AM
Some local Danish news:
- vaccines to start in about 3 weeks, very early in January, which will hopefully then mark a gradual turning point. We're 5.6 mio people & vaccines were bought from these companies, via the EU
Astra Zeneca: ca. 2,6 mio. vaccines
Sanofi-GSK: ca. 2 mio. vaccines
Johnson & Johnson: ca. 5,6 mio vaccines
Pfizer/BioNTech: ca. 2 mio vaccines
CureVac: ca. 2,6 mio. vaccines
Moderna: ca. 1 mio. vaccines
Some locally produced vaccines are also being created.

- 80% say they'll take the vaccine (it's going to be free), 14% decidedly not, and 6% are undecided.
https://www.berlingske.dk/virksomheder/80-procent-af-danskerne-er-klar-til-at-lade-sig-vaccinere-med-gratis

- infections going up a lot, but also tests. Yesterday 3100+, however 111.000 were tested, which is 25-30 % above the average number of tests.

- as a result, new restrictions, known from earlier in the year, are implemented in most of the country, such as eating places only serving take-aways, jobs preferably at home if possible, only youngest children now going to schools, gatherings above 10 people not allowed, many public institutions closed, etc. We're even recommended to stay at home, and to reduce Christmas visits.

- I got a flu vaccine yesterday, for free, they'd been put on a halt for some months for most people due to popularity/being less available, but my mild asthma didn't qualify for a pneumonia vaccine, which is said to be much more beneficial for corona cases. Have experienced zero side effects.

- health sector workers are stressed by the unusual work conditions, a majority of them are even considering finding other jobs, a poll finds. The health sector has been "slendered" in recent decades, it's not that there aren't beds, but more work pressure, and middle-layer and upper layer leaders plus reporting have been be prioritized, at the expense of basic ground work.

- Sweden facing further problems, also in the health sector now, clearly shown by presented statistics. I'd like a native Swede to explain to me, how they continue to put so much trust in their strategy/strategist over there, since reports tend to be bad.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 01:37:11 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 10, 2020, 03:49:23 PM
One explanation for these numbers is the vaccine Finland got for swine flu decade ago caused many Finns to get narcolepsy as a nasty side effect. It was really bad and compromised the trust for vaccines among Finns.

Yes plus we have become very distrustful of the pharmaceutical industry in general as a result of the wife's investigations into statins. It's an area you'd have to investigate for yourself though, it's extremely difficult to convince other people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 11, 2020, 02:30:56 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 01:37:11 AM
Yes plus we have become very distrustful of the pharmaceutical industry in general as a result of the wife's investigations into statins. It's an area you'd have to investigate for yourself though, it's extremely difficult to convince other people.

Convince other people of what?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 06:12:34 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 11, 2020, 02:30:56 AM
Convince other people of what?

Of anything contradicting what their preferred "authorities" tell them really - medicines, diet, religion, politics, the later music of Tangerine Dream...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 11, 2020, 06:30:32 AM
Biogen conference in Boston likely linked to 330,000 COVID-19 cases worldwide, researchers say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 11, 2020, 06:31:09 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-11/sanofi-gsk-delay-covid-vaccine-after-elderly-get-little-boost

Vaccine makers, including two of the biggest in the world, suffered setbacks in the push to get more Covid-19 shots across the line, tempering a run of positive news.

Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline Plc delayed advanced trials of their experimental Covid-19 shot after it failed to produce a strong enough response in older people, pushing its potential availability to the end of next year. In another blow, trials of a vaccine being developed by CSL Ltd. and the University of Queensland in Australia ran into difficulties.

Sanofi and its U.K. partner will begin a new second-phase study with a more concentrated antigen in February after they said the current dosage failed to generate a good immune response in people 50 years and older. Younger adults showed a response similar to patients who have recovered from the disease.

The problem arose after two different reagents used to measure vaccine formulations provided inaccurate information about the concentration of antigens, Sanofi said in an emailed statement. The companies notified U.S. officials about the matter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 11, 2020, 07:40:36 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 06:12:34 AM
Of anything contradicting what their preferred "authorities" tell them really - medicines, diet, religion, politics, the later music of Tangerine Dream...

I thought your wife had found out something alarming about statins, but it seems you were simply advocating critical thinking skills.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 09:22:20 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 11, 2020, 07:40:36 AM
I thought your wife had found out something alarming about statins, but it seems you were simply advocating critical thinking skills.

Oh she found loads about cholesterol actually being an essential part of cell membranes, the vital biochemical reactions that statins break, what damage they do etc. We certainly wouldn't be taking them. Twitter seems to be the platform to look on if you're interested, there are a lot of professionals on there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 11, 2020, 11:01:29 AM
Cheeto being Mussolini:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/11/white-house-threatens-to-fire-fda-chief-unless-covid-vaccine-oked-friday-report.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 12, 2020, 09:59:38 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 11, 2020, 11:01:29 AM
Cheeto being Mussolini:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/11/white-house-threatens-to-fire-fda-chief-unless-covid-vaccine-oked-friday-report.html

The FDA have now "decided" it's safe for emergency use and the US public can look forward to receiving it starting from Monday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 12, 2020, 10:23:12 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 12, 2020, 09:59:38 AM
The FDA have now "decided" it's safe for emergency use and the US public can look forward to receiving it starting from Monday.

Well, this has the air of the next phase of testing. My need is certainly no emergency.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 12, 2020, 03:19:34 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-12/swedish-covid-workers-are-quitting-leaving-icus-short-staffed

Sweden faces a shortage of health-care workers as the number of resignations ticks up after a relentless year of caring for Covid patients.

Sineva Ribeiro, the chairwoman of the Swedish Association of Health Professionals, says the situation is "terrible."

Even before the first wave of the pandemic back in March, there was "a shortage of specialist nurses, including at ICUs," she said in a phone interview.

The development shows that even countries with universal health-care systems are now struggling to keep up with the Covid crisis. This week, Stockholm's intensive care capacity hit 99%, sending the city into a panic and prompting calls for outside help.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 13, 2020, 08:48:50 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 12, 2020, 09:59:38 AM
The FDA have now "decided" it's safe for emergency use and the US public can look forward to receiving it starting from Monday.

     Trump bullied the FDA into announcing one day early. Any additional safety information can only come from the increasing number of people vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 13, 2020, 05:39:45 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 11, 2020, 09:22:20 AM
Oh she found loads about cholesterol actually being an essential part of cell membranes, the vital biochemical reactions that statins break, what damage they do etc. We certainly wouldn't be taking them. Twitter seems to be the platform to look on if you're interested, there are a lot of professionals on there.

I remember reading years ago that cholesterol is not only bad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 14, 2020, 05:09:38 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 12, 2020, 03:19:34 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-12/swedish-covid-workers-are-quitting-leaving-icus-short-staffed

Sweden faces a shortage of health-care workers as the number of resignations ticks up after a relentless year of caring for Covid patients.

Sineva Ribeiro, the chairwoman of the Swedish Association of Health Professionals, says the situation is "terrible."

Even before the first wave of the pandemic back in March, there was "a shortage of specialist nurses, including at ICUs," she said in a phone interview.

The development shows that even countries with universal health-care systems are now struggling to keep up with the Covid crisis. This week, Stockholm's intensive care capacity hit 99%, sending the city into a panic and prompting calls for outside help.
Wow.  Hard to believe that health-care workers in Sweden would be quitting; that said, the amount of stress that they've been through must be sky-high.  Have any of the ones who have resigned said what their top reason(s) were for quitting?   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 14, 2020, 05:31:43 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 14, 2020, 05:09:38 AM
Wow.  Hard to believe that health-care workers in Sweden would be quitting;

Really? Hard to believe? Considering the pandemic and how hard Sweden has been hit by it I don't find this surprising at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2020, 05:36:12 AM
Scientists pinpoint genes common among people with severe coronavirus infections (https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2020/12/14/covid-genes-illness-severity/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 14, 2020, 05:42:06 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 14, 2020, 05:31:43 AM
Really? Hard to believe? Considering the pandemic and how hard Sweden has been hit by it I don't find this surprising at all.

In addition, the article stated that the Swedish health care workers are not well paid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 14, 2020, 05:42:28 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/covid-vaccine-us-passed-on-more-pfizer-doses-in-november-says-board-member-gottlieb.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/covid-vaccine-pfizer-negotiating-with-us-to-provide-an-additional-100-million-doses-ceo-says.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 14, 2020, 05:53:39 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 14, 2020, 05:42:06 AM
In addition, the article stated that the Swedish health care workers are not well paid.

Where in the World they are?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 14, 2020, 07:09:35 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 14, 2020, 05:42:06 AM
In addition, the article stated that the Swedish health care workers are not well paid.
I didn't think that I could read the article that you provided a link to due to a *paywall and so didn't click on it...hence my further questions.  Surprised to see how little they were paid due to (from what I understand anyway) is the high cost of living in Sweden.

*I think that they allow 'x' number of visits per month?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2020, 02:49:58 PM
The number of confirmed coronavirus cases in Massachusetts rose by 3,572 on Monday, bringing the state's total to 283,146. The death toll from confirmed cases increased by 37 to 11,135, the Department of Public Health reported.

The agency said 72,883 people were estimated to have active cases of the potentially deadly virus, and 1,788 confirmed coronavirus patients were in the hospital.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 12:09:56 AM
First positive case in the school where I work, so everything is going online for the last few days of term. It's amazing that there have been no cases up until now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 04:21:25 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 12:09:56 AM
First positive case in the school where I work, so everything is going online for the last few days of term. It's amazing that there have been no cases up until now.
I hope that that one case doesn't lead to more among the students and faculty.

Stay safe Jeffrey!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 15, 2020, 06:23:50 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-15/sweden-s-hospitals-now-face-nationwide-staff-shortages-sr

Sweden's capital is considering shelving all non-essential health-care services to free up resources needed to tackle the relentless rise in Covid-19 cases.
...
Almost all of Sweden's regional hospitals are now struggling with a shortage of health-care staff, Swedish Radio reported. University hospitals across the country, with the single exception of Norrland University Hospital in Sweden's northernmost region, no longer have enough employees to look after the sickest Covid patients, the broadcaster said.

Sweden is trying to contain a much more serious resurgence of the virus than its top health authorities predicted would grip the country in a second wave. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven criticized that failure, in a separate report published in Aftonbladet on Tuesday.

Last week, Stockholm's health-care system almost caved under the pressure of the pandemic as its intensive care capacity hit 99%. Local authorities have since raised the alarm level to the second of three categories, enabling a forced redeployment of staff to address the health emergency.


https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden-coronavirus-surge-alarm-stockholm-hospitals-herd-immunity-strategy-2020-12

https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden-offered-urgent-coronavirus-help-by-neighbours-as-hospitals-fill-2020-12
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 15, 2020, 09:38:13 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 12:09:56 AM
everything is going online for the last few days of term.

You might think that; I could not possibly comment. :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 09:40:42 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 04:21:25 AM
I hope that that one case doesn't lead to more among the students and faculty.

Stay safe Jeffrey!

PD

Thanks PD much appreciated. I'm trusting that Vitamin D and red wine will see me through the crisis. The Headmistress gave us all a bottle of wine as a thank you which was nice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2020, 09:47:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 09:40:42 AM
Thanks PD much appreciated. I'm trusting that Vitamin D and red wine will see me through the crisis. The Headmistress gave us all a bottle of wine as a thank you which was nice.

That is nice;  hang in there, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2020, 12:25:41 PM
Europe wanted to keep schools open this winter. Coronavirus surges have disrupted those plans. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/12/15/coronavirus-countries-closing-schools/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 12:53:55 PM
Quote from: Que on December 10, 2020, 01:22:12 PM
Danes are obviously smart!   :)

CNN right now (December 15, 2020 23:49 Romanian Time) commenting on this:

New Poll: Most Black Americans Either "Wait and See" or Refusing to Take the Vaccine.

What are they then? Obviously smart or obviously stupid? Tertium non datur.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 01:29:00 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 15, 2020, 09:40:42 AM
Thanks PD much appreciated. I'm trusting that Vitamin D and red wine will see me through the crisis. The Headmistress gave us all a bottle of wine as a thank you which was nice.
Nice!  I hope that it was something, er...shall we say...decent?  ;)

I forget, how is Vitamin D supposed to help?  I try and remember to take me vitamins in the morning after breakfast. 

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 15, 2020, 01:57:54 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 01:29:00 PM
I forget, how is Vitamin D supposed to help?  I try and remember to take me vitamins in the morning after breakfast. 

PD

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77093-z

Vitamin D deficiency markedly increases the chance of having severe disease after infection with SARS Cov-2. The intensity of inflammatory response is also higher in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. This all translates to increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients who are deficient in vitamin D. Keeping the current COVID-19 pandemic in view authors recommend administration of vitamin D supplements to population at risk for COVID-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 01:59:15 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 15, 2020, 01:57:54 PM
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77093-z

Vitamin D deficiency markedly increases the chance of having severe disease after infection with SARS Cov-2. The intensity of inflammatory response is also higher in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. This all translates to increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients who are deficient in vitamin D. Keeping the current COVID-19 pandemic in view authors recommend administration of vitamin D supplements to population at risk for COVID-19.
Thanks db,

That was sweet of you.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 15, 2020, 02:00:57 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2020, 01:59:15 PM
Thanks db,

That was sweet of you.   :)

PD

You are welcome PD. That was Googled and copy pasted in seconds.  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 15, 2020, 02:25:37 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 12:53:55 PM
CNN right now (December 15, 2020 23:49 Romanian Time) commenting on this:

New Poll: Most Black Americans Either "Wait and See" or Refusing to Take the Vaccine.

What are they then? Obviously smart or obviously stupid? Tertium non datur.

CNN: Some Black and Latino Americans are still hesitant to take the vaccine. Here's what is fueling that distrust (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/04/us/vaccine-distrust-black-and-latino-americans/index.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 02:29:03 PM
Quote from: Que on December 15, 2020, 02:25:37 PM
CNN: Some Black and Latino Americans are still hesitant to take the vaccine. Here's what is fueling that distrust (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/04/us/vaccine-distrust-black-and-latino-americans/index.html)

Immediateky after posting I was sorry for not taking a picture of the CNN screen. I swear to God they posted what I quoted. I trust you trust I/m neither a liar nor a racist.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 15, 2020, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 02:29:03 PM
Immediateky after posting I was sorry for not taking a picture of the CNN screen. I swear to God they posted what I quoted. I trust you trust I/m neither a liar nor a racist.

I wouldn't dare to suggest anything of the sort. Perhaps Putin's fake news factory was at work?  >:D

Anyway,  I was joking and you were trolling.

And yes, there is obviously a tertium

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 02:48:48 PM
Quote from: Que on December 15, 2020, 02:35:53 PM
you were trolling.

Only if logic means trolling.

If P, then Q.
P.
Then Q

If 80% of a given group are willing to vaccinate, then that group is smart.
80% of Danish are willing to vaccinate.
Then Danish are smart.

If not Q, then not P.
Not Q.
Then not P.

CNN, December 15, 2020, 23:49: New Poll: Most Black Americans Either "Wait and See" or Refusing to Take the Vaccine.

Once again, my only fault is not taking a screenshot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 15, 2020, 04:05:49 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-15/covid-cases-strike-in-statehouses-with-mask-averse-lawmakers

https://www.concordmonitor.com/Dick-Hinch-New-Hampshire-speaker-death-interim-leadership-37714107

No one may ever know precisely where New Hampshire House Speaker Richard Hinch contracted the virus that killed him last week. But some of his fellow Republicans believe they have a culprit.

Two indoor events at a ski lodge -- one to celebrate the party's just-won control of the House and one to get organized -- led to an outbreak in the legislature. Masks were the exception at both. Hinch died Dec. 9, seven days after being sworn in as House speaker.

"Those in our caucus who refused to take precautions are responsible for Dick Hinch's death," tweeted Republican state Representative William Marsh, a retired ophthalmologist.

"Incredibly, incredibly irresponsible" Republican Governor Chris Sununu added in a news conference the next day, accusing officials of flouting health guidance "to make some bizarre political point."

Hinch's death at the age of 71 is sending a chill through state legislatures around the country, many of which are either already meeting or planning to next month. It came just three days after the announcement that Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for President Donald Trump, had been hospitalized with Covid-19 after participating in unmasked legislative hearings in Michigan, Arizona and Georgia.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2020, 05:20:30 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 15, 2020, 04:05:49 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-15/covid-cases-strike-in-statehouses-with-mask-averse-lawmakers

https://www.concordmonitor.com/Dick-Hinch-New-Hampshire-speaker-death-interim-leadership-37714107

No one may ever know precisely where New Hampshire House Speaker Richard Hinch contracted the virus that killed him last week. But some of his fellow Republicans believe they have a culprit.

Two indoor events at a ski lodge -- one to celebrate the party's just-won control of the House and one to get organized -- led to an outbreak in the legislature. Masks were the exception at both. Hinch died Dec. 9, seven days after being sworn in as House speaker.

"Those in our caucus who refused to take precautions are responsible for Dick Hinch's death," tweeted Republican state Representative William Marsh, a retired ophthalmologist.

"Incredibly, incredibly irresponsible" Republican Governor Chris Sununu added in a news conference the next day, accusing officials of flouting health guidance "to make some bizarre political point."

Hinch's death at the age of 71 is sending a chill through state legislatures around the country, many of which are either already meeting or planning to next month. It came just three days after the announcement that Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for President Donald Trump, had been hospitalized with Covid-19 after participating in unmasked legislative hearings in Michigan, Arizona and Georgia.



Asses!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 16, 2020, 01:37:02 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 15, 2020, 09:47:28 AM
That is nice;  hang in there, Jeffrey!
Cheers Karl
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 16, 2020, 06:04:07 AM
https://news.yahoo.com/hand-grasping-trump-appointees-describe-133636121.html

'Like a Hand Grasping': Trump Appointees Describe the Crushing of the CDC
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2020, 06:14:38 AM
Quote from: Que on December 15, 2020, 11:46:19 PM
You were trying to "frame" me and make me look bad, by putting nasty stuff in my mouth.

Not at all. I too was joking but if you really think that, I apologize and I assure you I had no such intentions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 16, 2020, 06:22:04 AM
One of the worsening days here in DK, 3700 newly registered, 14 fatalities (total is 975), 54 new hospitalized, but also 115.000 tested, which is a lot. They're announcing new restrictions later this evening. Various hospital surgeries are starting to become postponed.

Very different from the much more subdued summer days. Christmas buzz also a player, it's indoor season traditionally, etc.

Vaccines to start in slightly more than a week, at first for 40,000 elderly at retiring homes, and certain other folks, especially health workers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 16, 2020, 10:34:41 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/we-want-them-infected-trump-hhs-appointee-said-in-email-pushing-to-expose-infants-kids-and-teens-to-covid.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-16/trump-official-pushed-for-herd-immunity-strategy-emails-show

A Trump administration official sought to speed the spread of the coronavirus among children and young adults in order to achieve "herd immunity," according to documents released by a top House Democrat.

Paul Alexander, a senior adviser at the Department of Health and Humans Services, repeatedly encouraged adoption of a policy to increase the number of virus infections among younger Americans, saying they have "zero to low risk," according to documents released by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis.
...
In a series of messages during the summer, Alexander continued to make the case to other officials to open up college campuses and businesses to increase the spread among the young and relatively healthy, while maintaining distancing measures for the elderly.

"The issue is who cares? If it is causing more cases in young, my word is who cares," Alexander said in a July message. "As long as we make sensible decisions, and protect the elderely [sic] and nursing homes, we must go on with life....who cares if we test more and get more positive tests."

In August, President Donald Trump expressed support for the approach, saying the virus would "go away" once herd immunity was reached. However, other Trump officials, including Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, denied that the administration was pursing herd immunity as a way to handle the virus.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/16/trump-appointee-demanded-herd-immunity-strategy-446408

A top Trump appointee repeatedly urged top health officials to adopt a "herd immunity" approach to Covid-19 and allow millions of Americans to be infected by the virus, according to internal emails obtained by a House watchdog and shared with POLITICO.

"There is no other way, we need to establish herd, and it only comes about allowing the non-high risk groups expose themselves to the virus. PERIOD," then-science adviser Paul Alexander wrote on July 4 to his boss, Health and Human Services assistant secretary for public affairs Michael Caputo, and six other senior officials.
"Infants, kids, teens, young people, young adults, middle aged with no conditions etc. have zero to little risk....so we use them to develop herd...we want them infected..." Alexander added.


"t may be that it will be best if we open up and flood the zone and let the kids and young folk get infected" in order to get "natural immunity...natural exposure," Alexander wrote on July 24 to Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn, Caputo and eight other senior officials. Caputo subsequently asked Alexander to research the idea, according to emails obtained by the House Oversight Committee's select subcommittee on coronavirus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 17, 2020, 04:01:10 PM
Thursday's report was the first to designate more than half of the communities in Massachusetts high risk for COVID-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on December 18, 2020, 04:47:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2020, 02:48:48 PM
Only if logic means trolling.

If P, then Q.
P.
Then Q

If 80% of a given group are willing to vaccinate, then that group is smart.
80% of Danish are willing to vaccinate.
Then Danish are smart.

If not Q, then not P.
Not Q.
Then not P.

CNN, December 15, 2020, 23:49: New Poll: Most Black Americans Either "Wait and See" or Refusing to Take the Vaccine.

Once again, my only fault is not taking a screenshot.


Perhaps the Danes were never promised free medical care by their government and then knowingly allowed to die of untreated syphilis over a period of forty years. Stuff that information up your syllogism. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 19, 2020, 04:04:06 AM
Social distancing managed by plushies:

https://www.youtube.com/v/yVbiadltWMY
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 20, 2020, 04:25:45 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55385768

Covid: Belgium and Netherlands ban flights from UK over variant


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-20/u-k-s-hancock-says-new-covid-mutatation-is-out-of-control

U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock warned that the new strain of the coronavirus is "out of control" and suggested parts of England will be stuck in the new, highest tier of restrictions until a vaccine is rolled out.

More than 16 million Britons are now required to stay at home after a lockdown came into force Sunday in London and southeast England and the government scrapped plans to relax rules on socializing at Christmas.

The measures to control the fast-spreading new variant of the virus forbid household mixing in those areas and restrict socializing to just Christmas Day across the rest of England. Residents across the country were told to keep to their local areas, and extra police were being deployed at rail stations to stop people traveling out of London.

"Cases have absolutely rocketed, so we've got a long way to go," Hancock told Sky News. "I think it will be very difficult to keep it under control until the vaccine has rolled out." People in the new Tier 4 areas "should behave as though they have it," he said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Carlo Gesualdo on December 20, 2020, 05:10:02 AM
You know what irritated me about this covid-19 pandemic lack of responsability from youth t(that proabably won't die) and old folks that think like donkey lucky one vs middle age person that  watch out?

See, adolescent s and youth should had to skip class and economie I mean stupid bar closes okay. What wrong whit this province, look my father stubborn old man He will go out 12-14 time a day eventually for is darn lottery ticket and beers. Now he would feel sick stomach ache but  let hope it's not that virus, the worst part was  my mother  I don't live there I have my house said you gonna contaminated us paranoia, yet her husband  go out 12 time a days for stupid beers and lottery ticket, I am so mad at my father, than the youth think it's a joke and cough out of joke in bus, god damn little sob.

Dammit I am mad now, the problem is not about everyone buut old folks and youth desensitized to this pandemic.This is the problem and middle age man and womans feel trap in this. Why drinking 6 canns aof groshl beer so darn important each day and darn lottery is my father a town idiot or something, for myself I would avoid  goeing out the best I can , and cancel a gathering(because it's against the law) that someone play at my house  he had invited 4 people , I did not answer when the bell ring and did not answer when the phone rings,  I was so mad, What just happen is I fall asleep whit my phone suddenly it  buzz and message: we are coming over , no don't please don't come over I said texting but it was too late  they were on there way so I just shut the door both and lurk in darkness. If pandemic don't kill you darns fools will
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 20, 2020, 05:12:16 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55312505 (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55312505)

The elephant in the room, though, is the question of whether the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines (not to mention all the others still in the RCT pipeline) will be effective against the new variant. This article (linked to from the BBC story) says that one of the two new mutations is in the spike protein that all of the current vaccines target. The article implies that problems with vaccine efficacy against new strains are a serious question for the future, but doesn't specifically discuss whether this new strain may already have rendered the existing vaccines "obsolete".

Would be good to see some scientific discussion of this question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 20, 2020, 01:17:48 PM
What the Vaccine's Side Effects Feel Like
The COVID-19 vaccine will make some people feel sick. But they're not—that's the immune system doing its job. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/what-expect-when-you-get-covid-19-vaccine/617428/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 21, 2020, 01:00:00 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 20, 2020, 01:17:48 PM
What the Vaccine's Side Effects Feel Like
The COVID-19 vaccine will make some people feel sick. But they're not—that's the immune system doing its job. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/what-expect-when-you-get-covid-19-vaccine/617428/)

I remember my polio shot when I was a kid -  my arm felt sore and I had flu-like symptoms for three days.

But I was much better off then the kid that came new to school a few years later. He was on cruches and had been in an institution to revalidate from polio. His parents had refused him to be inoculated for religious reasons.
I felt very sorry for him: not only was he disabled, he also had to explain over and over again why he got the disease in the first place and hadn't been inoculated.... Most of the times he just said he didn't know...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on December 21, 2020, 01:21:04 AM
Quote from: Que on December 21, 2020, 01:00:00 AM
I remember my polio shot when I was a kid -  my arm felt sore and I had flu-like symptoms for three days.

But I was much better off then the kid that came new to school a few years later. He was on cruches and had been in an institution to revalidate from polio. His parents had refused him to be inoculated for religious reasons.
I felt very sorry for him: not only was he disabled, he also had to explain over and over again why he got the disease in the first place and hadn't been inoculated.... Most of the times he just said he didn't know...

Q
My polio vaccine was administered orally, a sugar cube impregnated with a pink liquid.

In my generation, we were given vaccines (polio, smallpox, etc.) which proved effetive in almost completely erradicating some serious diseases, and nobondy asked us whether we wanted them or not. I still remember standing in line in front of a hospital  in Vienna around 1970 (I was 6 or 7 at the time) to get the--mandatory AFAIK--cholera shots (it was administered in three doses IIRC), after a cople of cases occurred in the city. Nowadays, it seems that personal "choice" seems to get the upper hand over communal responsibility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 21, 2020, 01:43:45 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 20, 2020, 04:25:45 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55385768

Covid: Belgium and Netherlands ban flights from UK over variant


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-20/u-k-s-hancock-says-new-covid-mutatation-is-out-of-control

U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock warned that the new strain of the coronavirus is "out of control" and suggested parts of England will be stuck in the new, highest tier of restrictions until a vaccine is rolled out.

More than 16 million Britons are now required to stay at home after a lockdown came into force Sunday in London and southeast England and the government scrapped plans to relax rules on socializing at Christmas.

The measures to control the fast-spreading new variant of the virus forbid household mixing in those areas and restrict socializing to just Christmas Day across the rest of England. Residents across the country were told to keep to their local areas, and extra police were being deployed at rail stations to stop people traveling out of London.

"Cases have absolutely rocketed, so we've got a long way to go," Hancock told Sky News. "I think it will be very difficult to keep it under control until the vaccine has rolled out." People in the new Tier 4 areas "should behave as though they have it," he said.

All true. Johnson announced to the country "Have a merry little Christmas" with those words ringing in our ears, we like ten of thousands of others ordered a £50 turkey plus all that goes with it. I am no fan of Kier Starmer but he is running rings around Johnson on this issue. He warned Christmas may be forced to be shelved and Johnson ridiculed him only for days later to come to the same decision. I have an extremely unhappy wife who will not see her grandchildren and I will be eating turkey sandwiches through 2021!   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 21, 2020, 04:35:38 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 21, 2020, 01:43:45 AM
I have an extremely unhappy wife who will not see her grandchildren and I will be eating turkey sandwiches through 2021!

This sums up well the World as it is today: Things are just wrong.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 21, 2020, 05:38:30 AM
Worth a look if not paywalled:

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-resilience-ranking/

Winter and the long-anticipated rollout of coronavirus vaccines triggered some surprising shifts in Bloomberg's Covid Resilience Ranking, a measure of the best places to be in the Covid-19 era.

Each month, we crunch the numbers to get a snapshot of where the virus is being handled the most effectively with the least social and economic disruption.
...
Winter in the northern hemisphere has made a bad situation worse across Europe and the U.S., with the superpower plunging 19 spots despite the rapid authorization of two mRNA vaccines.

Mexico remains at No. 53, the last of the ranked economies. The country is closing the gap with other places as its positive testing rate falls and it lines up inoculations, but it's still facing a rampant outbreak.

The Ranking scores economies of more than $200 billion on 10 key metrics: from growth in virus cases to the overall mortality rate and testing capabilities. The capacity of the local health-care system, the impact of virus-related restrictions like lockdowns on the economy, and freedom of movement are also taken into account.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 21, 2020, 06:01:02 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 21, 2020, 01:43:45 AM
All true. Johnson announced to the country "Have a merry little Christmas" with those words ringing in our ears, we like ten of thousands of others ordered a £50 turkey plus all that goes with it. I am no fan of Kier Starmer but he is running rings around Johnson on this issue. He warned Christmas may be forced to be shelved and Johnson ridiculed him only for days later to come to the same decision. I have an extremely unhappy wife who will not see her grandchildren and I will be eating turkey sandwiches through 2021!
I don't blame her. I'm upset at not being able to see my daughter and her BF who live in London. Feel v sorry for people who are alone. Yes, the whole thing has been spectacularly mishandled by Johnson.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 21, 2020, 06:02:40 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 21, 2020, 04:35:38 AM
This sums up well the World as it is today: Things are just wrong.  :-\
A good point 71dB.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 21, 2020, 04:17:09 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 21, 2020, 06:02:40 AM
A good point 71dB.

Thanks! Let's hope 2021 will be less wrong than 2020 was.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2020, 06:02:47 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 21, 2020, 04:17:09 PM
Thanks! Let's hope 2021 will be less wrong than 2020 was.  0:)

Here's hoping!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 21, 2020, 11:21:25 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 21, 2020, 04:17:09 PM
Thanks! Let's hope 2021 will be less wrong than 2020 was.  0:)
Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 04:25:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 21, 2020, 06:02:47 PM
Here's hoping!
Quote from: vandermolen on December 21, 2020, 11:21:25 PM
Indeed.

Vaccinations have already started in your countries and are supposed to start next Sunday in EU countries. Light can be seen in the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel has been long and has claimed so many victims! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 22, 2020, 04:28:37 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 04:25:27 AM
Vaccinations have already started in your countries and are supposed to start next Sunday in EU countries. Light can be seen in the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel has been long and has claimed so many victims!
That is true. Coincidentally I just had my routine ONS Covid test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2020, 04:29:27 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 04:25:27 AM
Vaccinations have already started in your countries and are supposed to start next Sunday in EU countries. Light can be seen in the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel has been long and has claimed so many victims!

Unfortunately, at the 11th hour things are spinning out of control in a lot of countries, including my own... ::)

This morning it was announced that all regular, non urgent health care has been cancelled to save the system from collapse.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 04:51:40 AM
Wealthy Americans Caught Cutting Line To Get Covid Vaccine

Quote from: vandermolen on December 22, 2020, 04:28:37 AM
That is true. Coincidentally I just had my routine ONS Covid test.

When will you know the result?

Quote from: Que on December 22, 2020, 04:29:27 AM
Unfortunately, at the 11th hour things are spinning out of control in a lot of countries, including my own... ::)

This morning it was announced that all regular, non urgent health care has been cancelled to save the system from collapse.

Q

Oh boy, we needed the Covid-19 vaccines a year ago! It's like the 35th hour already!  ???

Yes, it's bad in many places. I'm lucky it's not that bad in Finland. Our healthcare system is not in danger of collapsing unless things escalate badly. The politicians and health professionals are urging people to spend "corona responsible Christmas." meaning only with the closest family members in small groups.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 22, 2020, 04:57:47 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 04:51:40 AM
Wealthy Americans Caught Cutting Line To Get Covid Vaccine

When will you know the result?

Oh boy, we needed the Covid-19 vaccines a year ago! It's like the 35th hour already!  ???

Yes, it's bad in many places. I'm lucky it's not that bad in Finland. Our healthcare system is not in danger of collapsing unless things escalate badly. The politicians and health professionals are urging people to spend "corona responsible Christmas." meaning only with the closest family members in small groups.

It's interesting about the result. I've had quite a few of these tests and never heard anything more. I assumed that the local surgery would let me know if I'd tested positive. Anyway, about a week ago I received a letter saying that my last test was negative. I mentioned this to the researcher who came round and she said that I should now get a letter after the test. More importantly, I'm now owed £50 in Amazon vouchers for participating - just think, all those CDs!  ;D

On a sombre note, Covid is now in the village so the risks must be higher now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 22, 2020, 05:55:58 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 22, 2020, 04:57:47 AM
It's interesting about the result. I've had quite a few of these tests and never heard anything more. I assumed that the local surgery would let me know if I'd tested positive. Anyway, about a week ago I received a letter saying that my last test was negative. I mentioned this to the researcher who came round and she said that I should now get a letter after the test. More importantly, I'm now owed £50 in Amazon vouchers for participating - just think, all those CDs!  ;D

On a sombre note, Covid is now in the village so the risks must be higher now.

They should always let you know the result, positive or negative. What if your test is positive, but someone forgets to inform you about it and you think the test came back negative because you heard nothing?

£50 worth of Amazon vouchers for participating? Wow! Happy shopping and be safe in the village.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 23, 2020, 12:28:16 AM
New restrictions, continued until at least January 3rd, now working here, following a sharp recent increase of cases. But the health sector will be strained due to delayed effects.

A new mutation from Romania, N 439K, causing worries. Mutations and vaccine procedures mean that most of 2021 will still require patience and restrictions, it's being said. On a personal level, I'll probably have to wait 6-10 months for a vaccine ???. Hoping for things to turn out better, though.

In yesterday's newspapers, there were two articles, both presented as the likely truth, concerning the societal long-term effects:
One esteemed professor talked about a psychological and economical recovery, likely from 2022, resulting in a new feeling of liberation, and a new age like the Roaring Twenties ... and another professor, that a new era of civic discipline and restrain, comparable to the petit-bourgeois 1950s, would be the likely outcome  ::).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 23, 2020, 12:39:44 AM
The effects of the pandemic are rather paradoxical: on the one hand the world has become even smaller with the pandemic highlighting global interconnectivity and interdependency, on the other hand the world of individual citizens has become much smaller as well by being thrown back to depend on ourselves and our immediate surroundings.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on December 23, 2020, 07:07:25 AM
This (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55410349) seems an interesting idea from Tony Blair -


Coronavirus: Vaccinate more people with one dose, urges Tony Blair

Mr Blair told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that although "you really need the two doses... the first dose gives you substantial immunity".

He argued there was a "strong case for not holding back the second doses of the vaccine" and instead using those batches to give a greater number of people the first dose.

His proposal was backed up by Professor David Salisbury, the man in charge of immunisation at the Department of Health until 2013.

He told Today the numbers were "straightforward".

"You give one dose you get 91% [protection] you give two doses and you get 95% - you are only gaining 4% for giving the second dose," he said.

"With current circumstances, I would strongly urge you to use as many first doses as you possibly can for risk groups and only after you have done all of that come back with second doses."




On the subject of the new variant spreading in the UK at the moment, it's being said that it may have originated in another country, and was only picked up on here because of Britain's world-leading genetic sequencing capabilities. Suggesting that it may already be spreading in other countries and just not spotted yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 23, 2020, 12:57:45 PM
Quote from: Irons on December 21, 2020, 01:43:45 AM
All true. Johnson announced to the country "Have a merry little Christmas" with those words ringing in our ears, we like ten of thousands of others ordered a £50 turkey plus all that goes with it. I am no fan of Kier Starmer but he is running rings around Johnson on this issue. He warned Christmas may be forced to be shelved and Johnson ridiculed him only for days later to come to the same decision. I have an extremely unhappy wife who will not see her grandchildren and I will be eating turkey sandwiches through 2021!
I'm so sorry to hear this.  It must be hard for all of your family.  Regarding food...a couple of ideas:  make some creamed turkey and serve in puff pastry...and if you have the room in the freezer:  make some turkey pot pies and freeze them or figure out a safe way to share them with your kids?  Let me know what you are trying to figure out how to use/save and I'd be happy to offer some suggestions.  Do you have much freezer room? Or perhaps possibly share some food and maybe some perishables with either neighbors or an organization that feeds people in need?  I know, this is a horrible season for everyone; just trying to offer some suggestions (which you have probably already thought of).

Best wishes,

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 24, 2020, 02:54:24 AM
Astonished to find today that the Biotime Innova test is allowed as a passport for people in the UK to enter France. Why am I astonished? Because mass testing trials in Liverpool found that that particular test has a false negative rate of about 60%. I just feel as though the world's going mad.

https://uk.ambafrance.org/List-of-antigen-tests-authorized-for-entry-to-France-from-UK-29434

https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2020/12/23/covid-19-liverpool-community-testing-pilot-interim-findings-published/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 24, 2020, 03:31:10 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 24, 2020, 02:54:24 AM
I just feel as though the world's going mad.

I'm afraid it is not just a feeling!  ???

New strains are discovered in the UK, and borders were closed.
But as it turns out they are not discovered because they originate in the UK, but because the Brits use gene sequencing techniques that can detect them.

Let's hope that the vaccines that have now been developed will be able to cover all new strains, or else we are back to square one... Or square -5 if a more deadly strain occurs...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 24, 2020, 05:38:06 AM
We noticed driving back through a town in Cheshire this morning that a big store had done what we'd thought earlier and put big sale signs up realising they now had one day to shift stock before being closed for who knows how long. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 24, 2020, 07:57:18 AM
Ach!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 25, 2020, 08:08:04 PM
The Mysterious Link Between COVID-19 and Sleep
The coronavirus can cause insomnia and long-term changes in our nervous systems. But sleep could also be a key to ending the pandemic. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/covid-19-sleep-pandemic-zzzz/617454/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 25, 2020, 08:17:47 PM
Interesting article. I'm all in favour of sleep so this is very encouraging. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 25, 2020, 08:33:04 PM
Has anyone seen this documentary?:

Hidden Gem: '76 Days' Examines the Human Cost of the Coronavirus Outbreak in Wuhan, China
Chinese-American director Hao Wu's documentary captures ground zero for COVID-19 as intensive care units are pushed to the breaking point: "My intention was for the audience to be immersed." (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hidden-gem-76-days-examines-the-human-cost-of-the-coronavirus-outbreak-in-wuhan-china)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 26, 2020, 01:19:27 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 23, 2020, 12:57:45 PM
I'm so sorry to hear this.  It must be hard for all of your family.  Regarding food...a couple of ideas:  make some creamed turkey and serve in puff pastry...and if you have the room in the freezer:  make some turkey pot pies and freeze them or figure out a safe way to share them with your kids?  Let me know what you are trying to figure out how to use/save and I'd be happy to offer some suggestions.  Do you have much freezer room? Or perhaps possibly share some food and maybe some perishables with either neighbors or an organization that feeds people in need?  I know, this is a horrible season for everyone; just trying to offer some suggestions (which you have probably already thought of).

Best wishes,

PD

Thanks for suggestions, P. As often the case yesterday turned out better then expected. We had a 3.5 kg turkey roll (bird would have been difficult) on order from local butchers. After cutting off a third for Christmas dinner and cold boxing day the rest is residing in the freezer. I was tempted to break the rules but glad I didn't. Cold, but a lovely day, we enjoyed a long walk, had zoom with the family and watched three episodes of "The King's Gambit" in the evening. So, quiet but nice. Trust you had an enjoyable day too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 26, 2020, 04:47:53 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/25/uk-scientists-trial-drug-to-prevent-coronavirus-infection-leading-to-disease

UK scientists trial drug to prevent infection that leads to Covid
Exclusive: Antibody therapy could confer instant immunity to Covid-19 on at-risk groups

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 26, 2020, 08:51:55 AM
U.K. variant of coronavirus continues global spread, despite containment efforts (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/12/26/variant-coronavirus-spreading-beyond-uk/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 26, 2020, 09:37:00 AM
This is the first time I've looked at this thread since the beginning of the outbreak. My reason for not reading or contributing is quite simple. Too much misinformation is posted from unreliable/unchecked sources. For example, a few pages back, someone posted that the virus has killed five times as many people as the 'flu. That statement was not supported by any source material but that is immaterial as it was likely to have been conjecture. I would dispute that statement anyway for a variety of reasons but am not going to do so at this point.

Here in Australia, the virus appears to be virtually non-existent but this doesn't stop the media from talking it up. Headlines state that two new cases have appeared in Queensland (WOW - TWO!!!!!) and then as an afterthought we are told that they are from people who are already in managed isolation, both of whom recently returned from overseas. This is hardly earth shattering and I shake my head when I hear/read it. Unless it's a major outbreak and people are being hospitalised/dying it's just journalistic fluff.

What the media should be doing is asking some important questions - well, important to me anyway.

The first question is:

"Are we taking the correct approach in dealing with Covid19?" Maybe this could be better asked as "are we being reactive or proactive" and the answer to that is obvious. So at what point do we switch from being reactive to being proactive and what form should this proactivity take?

The second question is one regarding demographics. "Who are the most seriously affected and most likely to die or suffer long term health effects?" This is not published anywhere by our media despite it being readily from many government websites.

The third question is: "What percentage of cases occur where people who are infected have mild to absolutely no symptoms whatsoever?" Once again, the answer is available from government websites. This question relates back to what I was talking about in the second paragraph of this post.

The last question is, I believe, the most important of the lot and should determine our approach to handling Covid19. Is Covid19 (or its variants) going to disappear? If the answer is no then that has major ramifications for the future.

One final point I'd like to make. Please don't assume that because I've raised these questions that I am a Covid19 denier. Also, please don't put words in my mouth. For example, recently I've had people accuse me of being right wing/conservative/Trumpian simply because I've raised a few questions about their point of view. Their response has been a "if you don't agree with me then you must be on the other side approach". All I am doing is asking questions. Perhaps their response is a way of not having to think or provide a considered opinion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 26, 2020, 09:50:12 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 26, 2020, 09:37:00 AM
(...) Too much misinformation is posted from unreliable/unchecked sources. For example, a few pages back, someone posted that the virus has killed five times as many people as the 'flu. That statement was not supported by any source material but that is immaterial as it was likely to have been conjecture. I would dispute that statement anyway for a variety of reasons but am not going to do so at this point.


I posted very briefly about the flu study to inform about an overall comparison, knowing that it was rather vague. There are many utterances on the web saying that the virus is just like the flu, and this contradicts it. I tend to trust Danish studies, but I also just referred to Danish sources, knowing that almost all readers wouldn't be interested in reading it in detail, or using google for translating it. Or maybe be that interested in the details. Hence the brevity.
Here's the source, BTW including a further link to a peer-reviewed article in English https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-12-06-dansk-studie-saetter-tal-pa-covid-19-er-mere-dodelig-end-influenza

QuoteThe second question is one regarding demographics. "Who are the most seriously affected and most likely to die or suffer long term health effects?" This is not published anywhere by our media despite it being readily from many government websites.

There really are tons of information available in the media about this, at least in countries hit harder, including mine. I also think there are some entries in the thread here, but don't think I've posted it myself. But long-time effects and the multiple, possible side effects still aren't known or sufficiently mapped yet, there is too much diverse info so far. Maybe the media picture is just different in Australia, but you'll have the advantage of easily finding other sources in English at least.

I think the media in my country overall has taken a both informative and constructive approach to the subject, the problems being mainly 1) information overflow and lack of final, scientific results 2) a certain dystopian/sensationalist approach at times, BUT it could have been much worse.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 26, 2020, 12:16:47 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 26, 2020, 09:50:12 AM
I posted very briefly about the flu study to inform about an overall comparison, knowing that it was rather vague. There are many utterances on the web saying that the virus is just like the flu, and this contradicts it. I tend to trust Danish studies, but I also just referred to Danish sources, knowing that almost all readers wouldn't be interested in reading it in detail, or using google for translating it. Or maybe be that interested in the details. Hence the brevity.
Here's the source, BTW including a further link to a peer-reviewed article in English https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-12-06-dansk-studie-saetter-tal-pa-covid-19-er-mere-dodelig-end-influenza

There really are tons of information available in the media about this, at least in countries hit harder, including mine. I also think there are some entries in the thread here, but don't think I've posted it myself. But long-time effects and the multiple, possible side effects still aren't known or sufficiently mapped yet, there is to much diverse info so far. Maybe the media picture is just different in Australia, but you'll have the advantage of easily finding other sources in English at least.

I think the media in my country overall has taken a both informative and constructive approach to the subject, the problems being mainly 1) information overflow and lack of final, scientific results 2) a certain dystopian/sensationalist approach at times, BUT it could have been much worse.

I'd extend that to include the English speaking media and it didn't occur to me that your sources would be in Danish so I agree that quoting references in this case would be pointless. Thanks for the link anyway.

One of my reasons for questioning that Covid19 is five times more prevalent than the flu came from some research that I did early on. I was looking at the mortality rate from influenza in Australia over the past decade and comparing that rate with Covid. My major source was an Australian government statistics website. Where the figures were given regarding deaths from the 'flu, the authors published an interesting disclaimer. They said that these figures came from cases that were officially/medically determined to have been the result of the 'flu and because of this the figures were likely to be very much higher. It was all dependent on what was written as the 'cause of death' on the death certificate Only those cases where influenza was specifically mentioned on that certificate were included. I could surmise from that if causes such as respiratory failure, pneumonia or similar were what was recorded then they were not included as part of the official influenza death toll.

This leads to another question: Is the converse true for Covid19? Does a patient who is diagnosed with coronavirus get Covid automatically listed as the cause of death? Would this be the case if a patient, with a history of coronary problems has had a fatal heart attack? At what point is coronavirus responsible and not natural causes? Did Covid19 cause the heart attack or was this likely to have happened anyway? The only way to really tell would be an autopsy and what's the likelihood of that happening?

This goes back to you mentioning people comparing Covid19 and the 'flu and that the two shouldn't be compared. While I agree that the two are very different, there are a number of similarities that would lead people to think that they are virtually the same. Transmission is effected by the same process (aerosol or surface contamination) and both mainly kill by compromising the respiratory system.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 12:49:59 PM
There has been a wealth of informed and informative reporting on the virus over the last year. i don't know why you'd say there hasn't been. Does "misinformation" mean to you anything that doesn't mirror your view that its no worse than the flu and all a big overreaction? All the questions you asked in your previous post have been extensively examined and answered in the reporting.

Merely two cases in managed isolation is something to celebrate not mock, and is something that right now many countries can only dream of and would take as a godsend. And is the fragile result of the vigilant around the clock work of a great many professionals, and easily undermined if taken as indifferently or frivolously as you are.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 26, 2020, 12:54:15 PM
The Danish study compares data from covid this year with the flu average of 2017-2020, cf. the link. Mortality might be somewhat less now due to improving corona treatments, it is also said there.

I meant that the fatality rate of the virus and the flu isn't the same, not that they aren't comparable. Especially in the beginning, or say from Bolsonaro, Trump or Lukashenko, you'd hear a lot about the virus just being another flu and not particularly more lethal, etc. Which science will disprove.

The reporting systems regarding the cause of death vary somewhat between countries - obviously, when medical/diagnostic ressources are low, the diagnosis may be wrong, or there may be a pressure to lower the numbers to avoid criticism or panic, and call the virus 'pneumonia' in stead. This is apparently happening quite often in some countries, for example Russia etc. etc. (any striving to inflate the numbers seems much rarer, if existing at all). But in DK, at least 95% of the registered corona fatalities are also due to getting the disease specifically. This from the highest official, at a live nationwide press conference including ministers (I mentioned that quite a while ago). And in quite a lot of the hit countries (including for example Sweden), there's also a much-above-average number of deaths generally this year, traceable to the disease outbreak. In Sweden, November was the deadliest in 102 years, since the Spanish Flu in 1918.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 01:12:53 PM
don't know if I posted it already, but one interesting thing that came from winter being in the middle of the year down here:

Covid-19: 'Near extinction' of influenza in NZ due to lockdown - epidemiologist (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/300129782/covid19-near-extinction-of-influenza-in-nz-due-to-lockdown--epidemiologist)

"Mask wearing and social distancing for Covid-19 has all but cut influenza cases in New Zealand this year, with only six flu isolates detected in this country from April to August.

Public health physician and epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker offered RNZ National's Sunday Morning programme his analysis on the flu season numbers and why masks continue to be so important.

He said there has been "near extinction of influenza in New Zealand following our very effective Covid-19 response", as numbers vanished from the two standard systems for surveillance - resulting in a 99.8 percent reduction in flu cases.

According to Baker, there were usually 1600 more deaths in winter, compared to other seasons, and around a third of those were caused by influenza, mostly in older people with long-term health conditions."[...]


same story in The Lancet:

Reduced mortality in New Zealand during the COVID-19 pandemic (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32647-7/fulltext)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 26, 2020, 01:17:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 01:12:53 PM
don't know if I posted it already, but one interesting thing that came from winter being in the middle of the year down here:

Covid-19: 'Near extinction' of influenza in NZ due to lockdown - epidemiologist (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/300129782/covid19-near-extinction-of-influenza-in-nz-due-to-lockdown--epidemiologist)

"Mask wearing and social distancing for Covid-19 has all but cut influenza cases in New Zealand this year, with only six flu isolates detected in this country from April to August.

Public health physician and epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker offered RNZ National's Sunday Morning programme his analysis on the flu season numbers and why masks continue to be so important.

He said there has been "near extinction of influenza in New Zealand following our very effective Covid-19 response", as numbers vanished from the two standard systems for surveillance - resulting in a 99.8 percent reduction in flu cases.

According to Baker, there were usually 1600 more deaths in winter, compared to other seasons, and around a third of those were caused by influenza, mostly in older people with long-term health conditions."[...]


same story in The Lancet:

Reduced mortality in New Zealand during the COVID-19 pandemic (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32647-7/fulltext)

Well done.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 26, 2020, 01:18:09 PM
Yes, we haven't had above average total mortality this year up here either, which is considered to be a result and success of the restriction policies & responsible behaviour.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 26, 2020, 01:18:29 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 12:49:59 PM
There has been a wealth of informed and informative reporting on the virus over the last year. i don't know why you'd say there hasn't been. Does "misinformation" mean to you anything that doesn't mirror your view that its no worse than the flu and all a big overreaction? All the questions you asked in your previous post have been extensively examined and answered in the reporting.

Merely two cases in managed isolation is something to celebrate not mock, and is something that right now many countries can only dream of and would take as a godsend. And is the fragile result of the vigilant around the clock work of a great many professionals, and easily undermined if taken as indifferently or frivolously as you are.

This is where I would have to disagree unless we are taking our 'news' from totally different sources. I don't include the anything speculative as 'informed' and there is plenty of speculative stuff about that appears to have little basis in actual fact.

Does "misinformation" mean to you anything that doesn't mirror your view that its no worse than the flu and all a big overreaction?

Is a perfectly good example of what I am talking about. You've read what I've written and then incorrectly assumed/speculated that I've taken a particular stance when I have done no such thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 26, 2020, 01:24:58 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 01:12:53 PM
don't know if I posted it already, but one interesting thing that came from winter being in the middle of the year down here:

Covid-19: 'Near extinction' of influenza in NZ due to lockdown - epidemiologist (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/300129782/covid19-near-extinction-of-influenza-in-nz-due-to-lockdown--epidemiologist)

"Mask wearing and social distancing for Covid-19 has all but cut influenza cases in New Zealand this year, with only six flu isolates detected in this country from April to August.

Public health physician and epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker offered RNZ National's Sunday Morning programme his analysis on the flu season numbers and why masks continue to be so important.

He said there has been "near extinction of influenza in New Zealand following our very effective Covid-19 response", as numbers vanished from the two standard systems for surveillance - resulting in a 99.8 percent reduction in flu cases.

According to Baker, there were usually 1600 more deaths in winter, compared to other seasons, and around a third of those were caused by influenza, mostly in older people with long-term health conditions."[...]


same story in The Lancet:

Reduced mortality in New Zealand during the COVID-19 pandemic (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32647-7/fulltext)

Another factor in the reduced influenza figures has to be the fact that the northern hemisphere goes through their 'flu season about six months before Australia and NZ. The flu tends to be brought ashore with overseas visitors and as there have been very few of those this year it stands to reason that the flu hasn't had a chance to arrive. Another plus of course is that we get the benefit of any vaccines that they've developed for whatever mutation of the flu that has occurred.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 26, 2020, 01:29:30 PM
Quote from: Holden on December 26, 2020, 01:18:29 PM
This is where I would have to disagree unless we are taking our 'news' from totally different sources. I don't include the anything speculative as 'informed' and there is plenty of speculative stuff about that appears to have little basis in actual fact.

Does "misinformation" mean to you anything that doesn't mirror your view that its no worse than the flu and all a big overreaction?

Is a perfectly good example of what I am talking about. You've read what I've written and then incorrectly assumed/speculated that I've taken a particular stance when I have done no such thing.

It should be clear from the links throughout this thread where people are getting their news from, and most I think have proven sober and reliable. If they are "speculative" then its because the health experts they quote can only speculate or give their best assessments and predictions based on unfolding and developing events.

Where do you get your news from? Apart from government sites which news reporting would you prefer we cite?

And I framed this: "Does "misinformation" mean to you anything that doesn't mirror your view that its no worse than the flu and all a big overreaction?" as a question not a statement, and I actually was wanting an answer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 26, 2020, 01:34:05 PM
For example, it took me literally 10 seconds of googling to find this about who was hit by Corona in the UK, a report from mid-2020.
Obviously more research will result in further information & details, depending on one's focus. Tons of it from DK, for example - not that all sorts of data exist yet, though.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2020/jun/11/who-does-coronavirus-kill-in-england-and-wales-visualising-the-data

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 27, 2020, 03:04:33 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 25, 2020, 08:08:04 PM
The Mysterious Link Between COVID-19 and Sleep
The coronavirus can cause insomnia and long-term changes in our nervous systems. But sleep could also be a key to ending the pandemic. (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/covid-19-sleep-pandemic-zzzz/617454/)
Interesting article Simon.

Must admit, I immediately wondered whether it was the taking of the melatonin that can make a difference or if it was just a matter of getting a good night's sleep.  Mind you, if one is feeling stressed out and not sleeping well, then yes, I would think that taking melatonin would help.  Wasn't happy to read that if one contracted Covid-19 that it could possibly disrupt ones capacity to sleep well--and who knows for how long?  I do appreciate the suggestions to get into a regular routine...get outside....knock off the computer/smart phones, etc. at least an hour before going to bed, etc.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 27, 2020, 03:19:01 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 26, 2020, 01:19:27 AM
Thanks for suggestions, P. As often the case yesterday turned out better then expected. We had a 3.5 kg turkey roll (bird would have been difficult) on order from local butchers. After cutting off a third for Christmas dinner and cold boxing day the rest is residing in the freezer. I was tempted to break the rules but glad I didn't. Cold, but a lovely day, we enjoyed a long walk, had zoom with the family and watched three episodes of "The King's Gambit" in the evening. So, quiet but nice. Trust you had an enjoyable day too.
Oh, nice!  Glad that it worked out o.k. in the end!  What was your turkey roll filled with?

Quiet day here but o.k. (pouring rain so no walks...was actually concerned about flooding).  Glad that I bothered to put up Christmas decorations as it helps things to feel a bit cheerier/hopeful around here.  A friend was kind enough to cut down a tree for me (had fun wading through over a foot of snow and wiping away around the bases of a few trees in order to look at them better), so as long as I water it regularly, it should last for several weeks.  Much cheaper too. $30 or $35 for a nice tree vs. double that last year at a greenhouse.  That tree, though bushier, shed needles right away!  Must have been cut ages ago!

Merry, merry!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 03:51:30 AM
Took my first test before Christmas, on the 23rd, the main stadium here in the capital being transformed into a quick-test center for up to 80 people simultaneously.

They put a stick deep into your nostrils for maybe 15 seconds, not particularly pleasant.

You get the answer (negative) within 30 minutes, via SMS. No other waiting, free, and very smooth. Accuracy is still debated though, between 60-90 %, apparently better if you just got infected.

Elsewhere, there's another, 95% accurate test with slower procedures. And an antibodies-test, in both cases where the results come after a couple days - and for the last-mentioned, you'll have to pay.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 27, 2020, 08:48:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 03:51:30 AM
Took my first test before Christmas, on the 23rd, the main stadium here in the capital being transformed into a quick-test center for up to 80 people simultaneously.

They put a stick deep into your nostrils for maybe 15 seconds, not particularly pleasant.

You get the answer (negative) within 30 minutes, via SMS. No other waiting, free, and very smooth. Accuracy is still debated though, between 60-90 %, apparently better if you just got infected.

Elsewhere, there's another, 95% accurate test with slower procedures. And an antibodies-test, in both cases where the results come after a couple days - and for the last-mentioned, you'll have to pay.

I'm curious about the effect of the sampling technique on test accuracy. Here at the university, our testing has been self-administered under supervision, five circles in each nostril with a Q-tip. The samples are sent to a Massachusetts laboratory called Broad, and analyzed via PCR. The results come in 24 to 48 hours. I had an influenza test last February using the deep nasal probe sampling technique (positive for Type A despite receiving the flu vaccine!), but the only COVID tests I've had have been using the self-administered technique just described.

PCR is said to be something like 95% sensitive for SARS-CoV-2, but surely that can only be measured on samples that are known to contain the virus. If the virus is missed because it wasn't in the outer nasal passages, then the false negative can't be blamed on the analysis procedure. I've never seen any data on whether the virus in an infected person is likelier to be found deeper inside, or whether it is just as likely to be found closer to the exterior, and to what extent the answer depends on time following exposure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 09:01:48 AM
Obviously, they turn the stick etc.; I didn't register the exact proceedings, concentrating on pressing my eyelids firmly together in order to think of something else than the unpleasantness, but what you're telling about the test seems quite likely to be the case here too, except I'm quite sure it was only in one nostril...  ;D

The quick tests were introduced to take some of the pressure from the free, better tests that became overbooked, and to provide easy tests. One isn't recommended to go there and take the quick tests, if one has symptoms of infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 27, 2020, 10:20:01 AM
It lasts just a few seconds, maybe 5-7, but it's quite unpleasant and the feeling is that it's much longer  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 10:28:42 AM
I strongly object to that suggested time frame in my case ! Also had to breathe during the process.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 11:19:46 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 09:01:48 AM
Obviously, they turn the stick etc.; I didn't register the exact proceedings, concentrating on pressing my eyelids firmly together in order to think of something else than the unpleasantness, but what you're telling about the test seems quite likely to be the case here too, except I'm quite sure it was only in one nostril...  ;D

The quick tests were introduced to take some of the pressure from the free, better tests that became overbooked, and to provide easy tests. One isn't recommended to go there and take the quick tests, if one has symptoms of infection.

I can't work out why anyone has the quick tests if they're asymptomatic.

If they get a negative they are no better off than before the test -- they don't know whether they are infected and contagious.

And if they get a positive they still don't know whether they are contagious. The link between the test fining a bit of old COVID RNA up your schnozzle and you actually being someone who infects people is, as far as I can see, totally obscure.

Given that, in the UK, getting a positive has legal consequences which are quite onerous -- self isolation -- I don't know if it makes any sense at all to volunteer!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 11:27:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 11:19:46 AM
I can't work out why anyone has the quick tests if they're asymptomatic.

If they get a negative they are no better off than before the test -- they don't know whether they are infected and contagious.

And if they get a positive they still don't know whether they are contagious. The link between the test fining a bit of old COVID RNA up your schnozzle and you actually being someone who infects people is, as far as I can see, totally obscure.

Given that, in the UK, getting a positive has legal consequences which are quite onerous -- self isolation -- I don't know if it makes any sense at all to volunteer!

Since you ask, because of visiting the family (we were 8 people, less than 10 has been recommended) during Christmas. Included vulnerable people.
That someone would visit anyone if getting a positive result goes beyond me, everyone here would consider it outrageously wrong and too much of a risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 11:49:06 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 11:27:51 AM
Since you ask, because of visiting the family (8 people, less than has been 10 recommended) during Christmas. Included vulnerable people.
That someone would visit anyone if getting a positive result goes beyond me, everyone here would consider it outrageously wrong and too much of a risk.

What I want to say is this. If you get a positive result and you don't have symptoms you don't know if you are contagious. Neither, as far as I can see, do you know if you are significantly more likely to be contagious than if you had a negative result. And if you get a negative result you may still be contagious.

In short, the rationality of the decision about whether or not it's right to visit someone doesn't depend at all on the result of the test. I know this sounds paradoxical, because these things are presented as "tests" -- but that's the way it is, unless I've missed something important (and I hope I have!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 11:57:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 11:49:06 AM
What I want to say is this. If you get a positive result and you don't have symptoms you don't know if you are contagious. Neither, as far as I can see, do you know if you are significantly more likely to be contagious than if you had a negative result. And if you get a negative result you may still be contagious.

In short, the rationality of the decision about whether or not it's right to visit someone doesn't depend at all on the result of the test. I know this sounds paradoxical, because these things are presented as "tests" -- but that's the way it is, unless I've missed something important (and I hope I have!)

As said, people agree that the percentage of correctness in the test is higher than the percentage of wrongness, between 60 and 90 % correctness, best if just being infected. Plus it's a gesture of consideration towards one's family, compared to not getting one and thus having bigger risk of being unknowingly sick.

EDIT: BTW, self-isolation, even on a vague basis, wouldn't be a major problem for me right now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 12:07:38 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 27, 2020, 11:57:47 AM
Plus it's a gesture of consideration towards one's family, compared to not getting one and thus having bigger risk of being unknowingly sick.

That I fully understand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 27, 2020, 12:26:35 PM
Quote from: krummholz on December 27, 2020, 08:48:22 AM
I'm curious about the effect of the sampling technique on test accuracy. Here at the university, our testing has been self-administered under supervision, five circles in each nostril with a Q-tip. The samples are sent to a Massachusetts laboratory called Broad, and analyzed via PCR. The results come in 24 to 48 hours. I had an influenza test last February using the deep nasal probe sampling technique (positive for Type A despite receiving the flu vaccine!), but the only COVID tests I've had have been using the self-administered technique just described.

PCR is said to be something like 95% sensitive for SARS-CoV-2, but surely that can only be measured on samples that are known to contain the virus. If the virus is missed because it wasn't in the outer nasal passages, then the false negative can't be blamed on the analysis procedure. I've never seen any data on whether the virus in an infected person is likelier to be found deeper inside, or whether it is just as likely to be found closer to the exterior, and to what extent the answer depends on time following exposure.
Hi Krummholz,

From what I understand, one can still get the flu after being vaccinated (even if it's for that strain), but hopefully the effects will be less severe.  This is from the CDC's website:

What protection does a flu vaccine provide if I do get sick with flu?

"Some people who get vaccinated may still get sick. However, flu vaccination has been shown in some studies to reduce severity of illness in people who get vaccinated but still get sick. A 2017 study showed that flu vaccination reduced deaths, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay, and overall duration of hospitalization among hospitalized adults with flu. Another study in 2018 showed that a vaccinated adult who was hospitalized with flu was 59 percent less likely to be admitted to the ICU than someone who had not been vaccinated. Among adults in the ICU with flu, vaccinated patients on average spent 4 fewer days in the hospital than those who were not vaccinated."

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/keyfacts.htm

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on December 27, 2020, 08:08:53 PM
The suffering here is profound.

(https://i.postimg.cc/vmhD5sm8/IMG-20201227-232151-hdr.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Detroit Free Press, 12/27/20.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2020, 05:58:02 AM
People with coronavirus are still getting on planes. No one knows how many.

I don't see myself boarding a plane anytime soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 28, 2020, 07:03:38 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 27, 2020, 11:19:46 AM
I can't work out why anyone has the quick tests if they're asymptomatic.

If they get a negative they are no better off than before the test -- they don't know whether they are infected and contagious.

And if they get a positive they still don't know whether they are contagious. The link between the test fining a bit of old COVID RNA up your schnozzle and you actually being someone who infects people is, as far as I can see, totally obscure.

Given that, in the UK, getting a positive has legal consequences which are quite onerous -- self isolation -- I don't know if it makes any sense at all to volunteer!

For us (university professors) it's mandatory during the semester when students are on campus. Same goes for all employees. And yes, a positive would lead to mandatory self-isolation... a GOOD thing I would say, since I certainly wouldn't want to be responsible for helping to spread the virus!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 28, 2020, 07:09:37 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 27, 2020, 12:26:35 PM
Hi Krummholz,

From what I understand, one can still get the flu after being vaccinated (even if it's for that strain), but hopefully the effects will be less severe.  This is from the CDC's website:

What protection does a flu vaccine provide if I do get sick with flu?

"Some people who get vaccinated may still get sick. However, flu vaccination has been shown in some studies to reduce severity of illness in people who get vaccinated but still get sick. A 2017 study showed that flu vaccination reduced deaths, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay, and overall duration of hospitalization among hospitalized adults with flu. Another study in 2018 showed that a vaccinated adult who was hospitalized with flu was 59 percent less likely to be admitted to the ICU than someone who had not been vaccinated. Among adults in the ICU with flu, vaccinated patients on average spent 4 fewer days in the hospital than those who were not vaccinated."

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/keyfacts.htm

PD

I'm well aware of that, but thanks. I mentioned my test result as a personal anecdote to make a side point that the vaccines do not give 100% protection against contracting influenza. As that link states, a vaccinated person is much less likely to have a severe case - and my case was so mild the only reason I went in to get tested is that there was a known epidemic on campus, several of my students had emailed in sick (saying that they had tested positive specifically for type A). Otherwise I would have chalked it up to a common cold virus, though it did leave me with a lasting case of laryngitis that dragged on for nearly a month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2020, 09:05:13 AM
A Maine toilet paper factory slows down after busy year in pandemic — 11:37 a.m.
By Associated Press

A Maine toilet paper factory that opened months before panic buying ensued at the start of the pandemic has enjoyed a "banner" first year, its owner said.

But things are beginning to slow down and Tissue Plus is focusing on a delayed renovation of its building in Bangor, Marc Cooper told the Bangor Daily News.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 28, 2020, 10:45:01 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 28, 2020, 09:05:13 AM
A Maine toilet paper factory slows down after busy year in pandemic — 11:37 a.m.
By Associated Press

A Maine toilet paper factory that opened months before panic buying ensued at the start of the pandemic has enjoyed a "banner" first year, its owner said.

But things are beginning to slow down and Tissue Plus is focusing on a delayed renovation of its building in Bangor, Marc Cooper told the Bangor Daily News.

They could close the factory for 10 years while people use all the toilet paper they hoarded last spring  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2020, 02:21:41 PM
South Africa imposes strict new rules as it surpasses 1 million covid-19 cases
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 29, 2020, 12:54:35 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 28, 2020, 09:05:13 AM
A Maine toilet paper factory slows down after busy year in pandemic — 11:37 a.m.
By Associated Press

A Maine toilet paper factory that opened months before panic buying ensued at the start of the pandemic has enjoyed a "banner" first year, its owner said.

But things are beginning to slow down and Tissue Plus is focusing on a delayed renovation of its building in Bangor, Marc Cooper told the Bangor Daily News.
Nice story about the company...not jacking up prices, hiring more people to meet the demand, and donating to a local homeless shelter.  :)

https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/bangor-toilet-paper-company-tissueplus-tries-to-keep-up-with-demand/97-023e2947-fb43-45a4-b92b-9996e8d3ccd1

PD

p.s. Hope that the renovations go well and that their business continues to prosper (though not due to Covid cases obviously!).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2020, 08:01:29 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 29, 2020, 12:54:35 PM
Nice story about the company...not jacking up prices, hiring more people to meet the demand, and donating to a local homeless shelter.  :)

https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/bangor-toilet-paper-company-tissueplus-tries-to-keep-up-with-demand/97-023e2947-fb43-45a4-b92b-9996e8d3ccd1

PD

p.s. Hope that the renovations go well and that their business continues to prosper (though not due to Covid cases obviously!).

Hear, hear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 30, 2020, 12:25:42 AM
- unexpected development here: for the first time in many years, more small, local food shops & groceries have been started up, than closed down; the virus outbreak  seems to benefit local quality, small-scale business somewhat.

- Christmas & New Year celebration effects are still somewhat unclear, but more hospitalizations and fatalities have meant that strict restrictions will be continued, so far with January 17th as the likely end date. A possible curfew for the New Year celebrations was given up, but still, only groups and parties of up to 10 persons are allowed.





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 05:13:52 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 30, 2020, 12:25:42 AM
- unexpected development here: for the first time in many years, more small, local food shops & groceries have been started up, than closed down; the virus outbreak  seems to benefit local quality, small-scale business somewhat.

- Christmas & New Year celebration effects are still somewhat unclear, but more hospitalizations and fatalities have meant that strict restrictions will be continued, so far with January 17th as the likely end date. A possible curfew for the New Year celebrations was given up, but still, only groups and parties of up to 10 persons are allowed.
So, did the local food shops and grocery stores close for good due to lack of business?  Or due to further restrictions?  Sorry but a bit confused here.

They're really discouraging New Year's Eve celebrations here.  I normally don't attend any anyway, so no biggie here, but am worried about other folks getting together and then there being an even bigger surge in the near future.  This morning, I heard about the first case of that new strain reported in England had been found in a young man in Colorado--who hadn't recently been in the UK....no idea yet how he managed to contract it.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 30, 2020, 06:28:54 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 05:13:52 AM
So, did the local food shops and grocery stores close for good due to lack of business?  Or due to further restrictions?  Sorry but a bit confused here.

They're really discouraging New Year's Eve celebrations here.  I normally don't attend any anyway, so no biggie here, but am worried about other folks getting together and then there being an even bigger surge in the near future.  This morning, I heard about the first case of that new strain reported in England had been found in a young man in Colorado--who hadn't recently been in the UK....no idea yet how he managed to contract it.

PD

Yes, it seems to be a little complicated regarding the smaller food shops, but their organization just told the glad tidings: that for the first time in many years, in 2020, the number of such small shops had grown; previously, they have been out-manoeuvered by malls and supermarket chains.

Perhaps customers like to support such small, local dealers, or they feel safer or more welcomed there, or they want specialty items to feel a little coziness these days, or there have been more customers in vacation areas with these small groceries ... some of them also deliver to customers ... in the very big picture, it might be a sign of a general, societal movement inwards, to the local scene, rather than outwards, due to the virus ... but we'll see, and it might be of less importance.

Regarding New Year's Eve, I think most people have generally become more aware these last days, due to the news, but there'll always be some careless people. I'm not aware of any news saying that the new mutations are vaccine-resistant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 30, 2020, 07:14:36 AM
Hospitals are becoming overwhelmed in Essex, UK. I am convinced it will become worse, much worse, in the coming ten days as the rules set over the Christmas period to isolate and not meet up with family members has been ignored by a large section of the population. There is a tragic price for this selfishness.

A neighbour contracted Covid in October. She has recovered, but my wife was shocked by her appearance when meeting by chance yesterday. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on December 30, 2020, 07:26:38 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 30, 2020, 07:14:36 AM
Hospitals are becoming overwhelmed in Essex, UK. I am convinced it will become worse, much worse, in the coming ten days as the rules set over the Christmas period to isolate and not meet up with family members has been ignored by a large section of the population. There is a tragic price for this selfishness.

A neighbour contracted Covid in October. She has recovered, but my wife was shocked by her appearance when meeting by chance yesterday.

Yesterday groups of young men were arriving from London at Bournemouth railway station 'because the pubs are still open'. From midnight that will no longer be the case as Bournemouth jumps from Tier 2 to Tier 4. One avenue of stupidity closed but plenty more opportunities to ignore the restrictions available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on December 30, 2020, 10:37:46 AM
I am pleased to see that *finally* the start of the UK secondary schools spring term has been delayed (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55487641). It seemed crazy with the new variant spiralling out of control in some areas, that the government were still insisting they wanted it to go ahead as usual.
The plan now is to send them back once mass testing is in place in schools, the administering of which is being left to the long-suffering teachers, alongside military help, which doesn't seem to have yet materialised for some.

But this government is keen on airily announcing schemes they say will resolve problems, that turn out to be poorly thought out, poorly implemented, and fall short of intended targets. I very much hope this one fares better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 30, 2020, 10:41:51 AM
Stay safe, mate!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 12:43:34 PM
Quote from: Iota on December 30, 2020, 10:37:46 AM
I am pleased to see that *finally* the start of the UK secondary schools spring term has been delayed (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55487641). It seemed crazy with the new variant spiralling out of control in some areas, that the government were still insisting they wanted it to go ahead as usual.
The plan now is to send them back once mass testing is in place in schools, the administering of which is being left to the long-suffering teachers, alongside military help, which doesn't seem to have yet materialised for some.

But this government is keen on airily announcing schemes they say will resolve problems, that turn out to be poorly thought out, poorly implemented, and fall short of intended targets. I very much hope this one fares better.
So, who is supposed to administer the tests??  ???

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 12:44:20 PM
Quote from: Irons on December 30, 2020, 07:14:36 AM
Hospitals are becoming overwhelmed in Essex, UK. I am convinced it will become worse, much worse, in the coming ten days as the rules set over the Christmas period to isolate and not meet up with family members has been ignored by a large section of the population. There is a tragic price for this selfishness.

A neighbour contracted Covid in October. She has recovered, but my wife was shocked by her appearance when meeting by chance yesterday.
Wow!  Did she look particularly tired or???  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on December 30, 2020, 02:10:20 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 12:43:34 PM
So, who is supposed to administer the tests??  ???

PD

The two ideas I've heard are that teachers would be trained by military personnel, and that schools would receive funding to hire staff from employment agencies to carry out the testing.

But see e.g -

'Her Labour colleague, Yvette Cooper, said schools in her constituency had received no support or allocation of funding, and no contact from the military, which has been organising testing in some schools.

She added: "They all want to do this mass testing but the support they are getting is always too late, too chaotic." '


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55487641
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on December 30, 2020, 02:11:21 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 30, 2020, 10:41:51 AM
Stay safe, mate!

Thank you!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 30, 2020, 02:15:06 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 30, 2020, 12:44:20 PM
Wow!  Did she look particularly tired or???  :(

PD

Big weight loss. Feel uncomfortable being too descriptive but she looked ten years older. My wife said she would never have recognised her without our neighbour standing next to her husband. She has no idea where she caught the virus.

My daughter had the jab today - she visits a care home once a week to attend the residents hair. Instructed by email to be at the home 2.30. A doctor turned up to administer the injection at 6pm!


I am expecting all football to be stopped until vaccine on stream. Fulham v Spurs cancelled this evening. My team are due to play at Everton on New Year's Day I am fully expecting this to be called off.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 31, 2020, 04:24:58 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 30, 2020, 02:15:06 PM
Big weight loss. Feel uncomfortable being too descriptive but she looked ten years older. My wife said she would never have recognised her without our neighbour standing next to her husband. She has no idea where she caught the virus.

My daughter had the jab today - she visits a care home once a week to attend the residents hair. Instructed by email to be at the home 2.30. A doctor turned up to administer the injection at 6pm!


I am expecting all football to be stopped until vaccine on stream. Fulham v Spurs cancelled this evening. My team are due to play at Everton on New Year's Day I am fully expecting this to be called off.
So sorry to hear that about your neighbor; I hope that she regains her strength and energy soon.

Glad that your daughter received her shot though concerning as to why it took so long for the doctor to get there?

Here, I've heard about various sports teams not being able to play anymore as some of the players weren't being good about staying in their bubble and made others sick too!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 31, 2020, 05:32:35 AM
I think in the mind of the general public there is way too much focus on the mortality rate, which is very low if you are under 70, and too little attention for the possible long term side effects.

If you recover from the flu, you're generally fine and as before.
If you recover from COVID, even if you didn't need to be admitted to hospital, you might suffer from chronic fatigue, significantly diminished lung capacity and all kinds of neurological issues. And suddenly you are in a risk category for getting a stroke at some point... even if you weren't before.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 31, 2020, 05:50:57 AM
Quote from: Que on December 31, 2020, 05:32:35 AM
I think in the mind of the general public there is way too much focus on the mortality rate, which is very low if you are under 70, and too little attention for the possible long term side effects.

If you recover from the flu, you're generally fine and as before.
If you recover from COVID, even if you didn't need to be admitted to hospital, you might suffer from chronic fatigue, significantly diminished lung capacity and all kinds of neurological issues. And suddenly you are in a risk category for getting a stroke at some point... even if you weren't before.

Q

This is my understanding as well. Seems like the exact opposite of "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger."   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 31, 2020, 06:06:57 AM
Quote from: Que on December 31, 2020, 05:32:35 AM
I think in the mind of the general public there is way too much focus on the mortality rate, which is very low if you are under 70, and too little attention for the possible long term side effects.

If you recover from the flu, you're generally fine and as before.
If you recover from COVID, even if you didn't need to be admitted to hospital, you might suffer from chronic fatigue, significantly diminished lung capacity and all kinds of neurological issues. And suddenly you are in a risk category for getting a stroke at some point... even if you weren't before.

Q

Yes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 31, 2020, 02:21:28 PM
Oh, Lawd!

For psychics, a year like no other: 'Everybody wants to know what's coming'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 31, 2020, 02:42:26 PM
Heh. Had to find and read that:

For psychics, a year like no other: 'Everybody wants to know what's coming'
Hopefuls search for certainty in plexiglass palm reading, tarot cards at home and advice dispensed on the phone (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2020/12/31/dc-psychics-predict-future-pandemic-covid/)

[...]"Vague musings like these are what keep psychic-skeptics skeptical, but keep Kadosh's devotees coming back, paying $25 for a 10-minute reading, or her "covid special," $40 for 20 minutes.

She believes she inherited her abilities from her mother, a healer who she said "did the type of thing Jesus did," such as closing Kadosh's wounds minutes after a Rehoboth Beach shark shredded her legs when she was 11.

Now Kadosh carries on her craft, and after decades of studying astrology and science and religious texts, claims she is 97 percent accurate, unlike others in her profession.

"Ninety-eight percent of them are not real or are just a gypsy trying to make money," she declared.

Her table once attracted a steady stream of stressed-out D.C. types, cash-plump tourists and people whom she described as "not human." "You probably didn't even realize we have extraterrestrials walking around now did you?" she asked.

"It takes me years, sometimes, to get people out of their darkness, but only I can do it for them, because their therapist cannot get them out of there."[...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 01, 2021, 04:31:39 AM
Investigators believe that a man (currently then working as a pharmacist at a hospital) deliberately took out numerous vials of the Moderna vaccine out of the refrigerator so that they would no longer viable.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wisconsin-missing-moderna-vaccine-police-arrest-former-pharmacist/ar-BB1cnC3G?tblci=GiD7ENSphjsuk5OMHlIsqsymoe2qW8gV_SCDnqUZKsYtNSCC-00
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 01, 2021, 05:36:20 AM
Quote from: Que on December 31, 2020, 05:32:35 AM
I think in the mind of the general public there is way too much focus on the mortality rate, which is very low if you are under 70, and too little attention for the possible long term side effects.

If you recover from the flu, you're generally fine and as before.
If you recover from COVID, even if you didn't need to be admitted to hospital, you might suffer from chronic fatigue, significantly diminished lung capacity and all kinds of neurological issues. And suddenly you are in a risk category for getting a stroke at some point... even if you weren't before.

Q

Whoa, where's the evidence for this? By evidence we are talking about a directed, peer reviewed study. A few documented cases surely doesn't count as evidence. On top of that, one of the side effects of influenza, for a small group of sufferers, is reduced lung capacity. Please note that this is for a "small" group. Would that group be any bigger percentage wise for Covid?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 01, 2021, 06:42:06 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 01, 2021, 05:36:20 AM
Whoa, where's the evidence for this? By evidence we are talking about a directed, peer reviewed study. A few documented cases surely doesn't count as evidence. On top of that, one of the side effects of influenza, for a small group of sufferers, is reduced lung capacity. Please note that this is for a "small" group. Would that group be any bigger percentage wise for Covid?

There are several reports from reliable sources to that effect.
On top of that I personally know a few ex-COVID patients that are strungling with these effects. Note they are in their late 30s/early 40s.

That's good enough for me.

Anyway, it's not my duty to convince you - you're welcome to do your own research.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on January 01, 2021, 08:13:54 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 01, 2021, 05:36:20 AM
Whoa, where's the evidence for this? By evidence we are talking about a directed, peer reviewed study. A few documented cases surely doesn't count as evidence. On top of that, one of the side effects of influenza, for a small group of sufferers, is reduced lung capacity. Please note that this is for a "small" group. Would that group be any bigger percentage wise for Covid?

I've read and heard (NPR) that Covid-19 has deleterious effects on blood vessel linings in some people, which can result in serious and apparently indiscriminate organ and tissue damage. People have suffered kidney and liver damage, in addition to the obvious pulmonary effects, and even brain damage. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 01, 2021, 08:30:17 AM
Quote from: Que on January 01, 2021, 06:42:06 AM
There are several reports from reliable sources to that effect.
On top of that I personally know a few ex-COVID patients that are strungling with these effects. Note they are in their late 30s/early 40s.

That's good enough for me.

Anyway, it's not my duty to convince you - you're welcome to do your own research.

Q
Que,

I'm curious as to how seriously were they initially hit by the virus?  And when did they start experiencing these effects?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 01, 2021, 08:32:07 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on January 01, 2021, 08:13:54 AM
I've read and heard (NPR) that Covid-19 has deleterious effects on blood vessel linings in some people, which can result in serious and apparently indiscriminate organ and tissue damage. People have suffered kidney and liver damage, in addition to the obvious pulmonary effects, and even brain damage.
Did the article/story go into any depth of whether or not they had pre-existing conditions which doctors/health officials think made them susceptible to their health issues?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 01, 2021, 08:36:57 AM
The problem isn't whether the virus has side effects versus those of the flu, there are reportedly plenty, it's doing enough research for valid statistics and having enough of a time span for that. Besides those mentioned, tiredness, weakened senses including tasting ability, and even psychosis are occurring as side effects, for example.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2021, 08:39:04 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 01, 2021, 08:36:57 AM
The problem isn't whether the virus has side effects versus those of the flu, there are reportedly plenty, it's doing enough research for valid statistics and having enough of a time span for that. Besides those mentioned, tiredness, weakened senses including taste ability, and even psychosis are occurring as side effects, for example.

Yes, my friend's brother contracted the virus, and has since succumbed to psychosis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 01, 2021, 08:40:48 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2021, 08:39:04 AM
Yes, my friend's brother contracted the virus, and has since succumbed to psychosis.
That's sad to hear. In the course of this year, things will hopefully be moving generally to the better ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 01, 2021, 08:46:04 AM
So sorry to hear that Karl; I hope that he gets better and soon!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2021, 08:50:42 AM
Thank you both.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 01, 2021, 08:58:01 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2021, 08:39:04 AM
Yes, my friend's brother contracted the virus, and has since succumbed to psychosis.

That's absolutely a horrible thing to happen to anyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 01, 2021, 09:11:01 AM
Gosh, that's very bad, Karl, I had to google it and it looks like there are a few cases of psychosis after COVID but no one is clear that it's connected. Hopefully he's in good hands and it will be gotten under control soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 02, 2021, 12:22:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2021, 08:39:04 AM
Yes, my friend's brother contracted the virus, and has since succumbed to psychosis.
I'm so sorry to hear that Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 03, 2021, 07:15:11 AM
Luckily, holidays were celebrated in a disciplined way here in DK, and apparently no further virus increase took place, but there's also a lot of worrying about the new, more "effective" mutations coming from the UK. This might lead to further lock-down measures very soon. And there are talks about maybe using the one-dose-only vaccine strategy. But in reality, you can't prohibit those mutations from spreading somewhat.

Provided that the vaccines will work on a bigger scale later in the year, it seems that we'll end up with between 2000 - 3500 fatalities totally here. Currently approaching 1400, and 10 - 30 daily, with some bad cases in homes for the elderly. So far, an average lock-down until January 17th. Approaching only 1% of the population having received a (first) vaccine, far from the results in say Israel or the UK, but partly related to the slower EU ongoings.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 03, 2021, 07:34:06 AM
I hope authorities around the world have learned a few lessons for the next pandemic, which might come soon and could be more dangerous:

'COVID-19 not necessarily the big one, next pandemic may be severe,' warns WHO (https://m.businesstoday.in/story/covid-19-not-necessarily-the-big-one-next-pandemic-may-be-severe-warns-who/1/426457.html)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 03, 2021, 08:30:52 AM
With infection rates ballooning here in London, it was something of a relief to see Gavin Williamson do a last minute U-turn and close all primary schools for two weeks at the beginning of term, after mystifyingly insisting that a number of them would open. He seemed to be operating under the impression that the coronavirus wouldn't do anything as recklessly irresponsible, as to cross from one postcode to another.  ::)

It seems to me, with the virus now beginning to spread vigorously across the country and elsewhere, it would be sensible to close all schools, secondary and primary, for two weeks, in a bid to get a little ahead of the virus, rather than waiting for the inevitable surge. But this is again being resisted by the government, despite much pressure for them to do so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 03, 2021, 08:34:25 AM
France vows to boost pace of vaccinations after slow rollout 'fiasco' (https://www.france24.com/en/france/20210103-france-vows-to-boost-pace-of-vaccinations-after-slow-rollout-fiasco)

(https://s.france24.com/media/display/f615f6bc-4dd8-11eb-bec6-005056bf18d4/w:1024/p:4x3/OurWorld-in-Data-352-Jan3.webp)

The US isn't the only country with distribution and vaccination delays it seems.  Israel is the only charted country seeming to do well in terms of vaccinating its populace on a percentage basis.  I can't see how herd immunity through vaccination in the US can be achieved before late Q3 at the earliest.  Hopefully I am wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 03, 2021, 10:27:42 AM
Quote from: Iota on January 03, 2021, 08:30:52 AM

It seems to me, with the virus now beginning to spread vigorously across the country and elsewhere, it would be sensible to close all schools, secondary and primary, for two weeks, in a bid to get a little ahead of the virus, rather than waiting for the inevitable surge. But this is again being resisted by the government, despite much pressure for them to do so.

Well you know the tories have a winning formula with Covid - they're topping the poles, they've convinced people that it's the people's fault that the disease is rampant, and they and their friends have had a good feed at the trough and are much richer for it. They're not going to do anything to jeopardise what is, from their point of view, a most excellent Covid pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 03, 2021, 10:30:16 AM
Quote from: Todd on January 03, 2021, 08:34:25 AM

Israel is the only charted country seeming to do well in terms of vaccinating its populace on a percentage basis.

Er what about the population in occupied Palestine? Israel are responsible for their health under international law, but of course, from their point of view, the less Palestinians the better so Covid is a blessing in disguise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 03, 2021, 10:31:35 AM
Quote from: Que on January 03, 2021, 07:34:06 AM
I hope authorities around the world have learned a few lessons for the next pandemic, which might come soon and could be more dangerous:

'COVID-19 not necessarily the big one, next pandemic may be severe,' warns WHO (https://m.businesstoday.in/story/covid-19-not-necessarily-the-big-one-next-pandemic-may-be-severe-warns-who/1/426457.html)

Q

I refuse to read this scaremongering post.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 03, 2021, 11:14:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 03, 2021, 10:31:35 AM
I refuse to read this scaremongering post.

It's the World Health Organization.... this is serious.  ::)

But that doesn't it make less scary, rather more, so I quite understand your take on it.

Not much we can do about it anyway... The message of the WHO is probably meant for those who can....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: geralmar on January 03, 2021, 01:54:50 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/Nfhb2k44/new-year-scenario.png) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 04, 2021, 01:38:27 AM
Dutch and Danish studies now indicating that a good level of Vitamin K seems very important for avoiding the harder versions of the sickness. Further surveying still needed, though, but data so far appear convincing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 04, 2021, 06:41:56 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqzoTH0W4AESIeo?format=jpg&name=large)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 05, 2021, 05:25:21 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/05/south-africa-covid-variant-appears-to-obviate-antibody-drugs-dr-scott-gottlieb-says.html

Dr. Scott Gottlieb warned that vaccinating Americans against Covid is more critical than ever, especially as the new South Africa variant appears to inhibit antibody drugs. 

"The South Africa variant is very concerning right now because it does appear that it may obviate some of our medical countermeasures, particularly the antibody drugs," said the former FDA chief in the Trump administration in an interview on CNBC's "The News with Shepard Smith" on Tuesday evening. "Right now that strain does appear to be prevalent in South America [Africa?] and Brazil, the two parts of the world, right now, that are in their summer, but also experiencing a very dense epidemic, and that's concerning.["]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2021, 05:43:46 PM
Horrid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 05, 2021, 06:51:41 PM
A very long read in the New Yorker:

The Plague Year
The mistakes and the struggles behind America's coronavirus tragedy.
By Lawrence Wright (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/01/04/the-plague-year)

.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 05, 2021, 08:17:01 PM
Quote from: T. D. on January 05, 2021, 05:25:21 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/05/south-africa-covid-variant-appears-to-obviate-antibody-drugs-dr-scott-gottlieb-says.html

Dr. Scott Gottlieb warned that vaccinating Americans against Covid is more critical than ever, especially as the new South Africa variant appears to inhibit antibody drugs. 

"The South Africa variant is very concerning right now because it does appear that it may obviate some of our medical countermeasures, particularly the antibody drugs," said the former FDA chief in the Trump administration in an interview on CNBC's "The News with Shepard Smith" on Tuesday evening. "Right now that strain does appear to be prevalent in South America and Brazil, the two parts of the world, right now, that are in their summer, but also experiencing a very dense epidemic, and that's concerning.["]

Does « obviate some of our  . . . antibody drugs » mean « make the vaccines less effective »? In Europe we're being told there's no evidence for this at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2021, 10:08:49 PM
More news every day ... the expected advance of the UK mutation yesterday resulted in a stricter lock down here, trying to minimize it. Groups only of 5 people, 2 m distance between individuals, thinning out in public transport, etc. It will probably become the main virus during February. BTW, 9000 different mutations have been identified and mapped here. Curfew will be the last among the options. Increasing strain on one's working and daily life decisions and prospects.

On the positive side, all residents at the homes of the elderly have now received first vaccinations, and authorities are planning for 100,000 vaccinations per day later. Being 5.8 mio people, this could mean vaccine programs being implemented in about 2-3 months, when they become fully available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 06, 2021, 12:53:57 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2021, 10:08:49 PM
More news every day ... the expected advance of the UK mutation yesterday resulted in a stricter lock down here, trying to minimize it. Groups only of 5 people, 2 m distance between individuals, thinning out in public transport, etc. It will probably become the main virus during February. BTW, 9000 different mutations have been identified and mapped here. Curfew will be the last among the options. Increasing strain on one's working and daily life decisions and prospects.

On the positive side, all residents at the homes of the elderly have now received first vaccinations, and authorities are planning for 100,000 vaccinations per day later. Being 5.8 mio people, this could mean vaccine programs being implemented in about 2-3 months, when they become fully available.

Apparently 1 in 45 have the disease in the South East. All my lessons have to go online again.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 06, 2021, 04:54:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 06, 2021, 12:53:57 AM
Apparently 1 in 45 have the disease in the South East.

And announced rather starkly on the BBC last night that in London it is now 1 in 30, the worst rate there has been at any time during the pandemic throughout the whole country. Things certainly not seeming rosy at the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 06, 2021, 12:23:26 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 04, 2021, 01:38:27 AM
Dutch and Danish studies now indicating that a good level of Vitamin K seems very important for avoiding the harder versions of the sickness. Further surveying still needed, though, but data so far appear convincing.
Interesting and thanks for letting us know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2021, 05:33:09 PM
My Occupational Therapist will receive the second dose of the vaccine on Sunday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 06, 2021, 05:53:53 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 05, 2021, 06:51:41 PM
A very long read in the New Yorker:

The Plague Year
The mistakes and the struggles behind America's coronavirus tragedy.
By Lawrence Wright (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/01/04/the-plague-year)

.

I hope some people make the time to read that. It's very well written and there's much more to it than the title suggests.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 07, 2021, 05:14:09 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/a-record-number-of-people-died-from-covid-the-last-two-days-in-the-us-.html

A record number of people died in the U.S. from Covid-19 on Tuesday and again on Wednesday as a mob of angry rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol.

A record 3,733 people died from the virus on Tuesday, followed by 3,865 deaths Wednesday, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Over the past seven days, the country reported an average of 2,686 fatalities every day — a figure second only to the record high set a little over two weeks ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on January 07, 2021, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 05, 2021, 08:17:01 PM
Does « obviate some of our  . . . antibody drugs » mean « make the vaccines less effective »? In Europe we're being told there's no evidence for this at all.

I'd guess no. I believe that statement refers to monoclonal antibody treatments, meaning administering antibodies taken from someone who has had the virus and recovered. The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are MRNA vaccines, which is something else altogether.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 07, 2021, 12:45:33 PM
[Mass.] Governor Charlie Baker said Thursday that the state is extending by at least two weeks the capacity restrictions on various industries and limits on indoor and outdoor gatherings to combat the spread of COVID-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 07, 2021, 05:06:02 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 06, 2021, 05:53:53 PM
I hope some people make the time to read that. It's very well written and there's much more to it than the title suggests.

I shall read it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 08, 2021, 03:45:03 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on January 07, 2021, 12:26:53 PM
I'd guess no. I believe that statement refers to monoclonal antibody treatments, meaning administering antibodies taken from someone who has had the virus and recovered. The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are MRNA vaccines, which is something else altogether.

A nit here: I think you're confusing monoclonal antibodies with convalescent plasma. As I understand it, monoclonal antibodies are produced in the laboratory by cloning specific kinds of white blood cells.

Both are very different from a vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 08, 2021, 07:28:04 AM
Health authorities now saying here in DK that all inhabitants will have had the option of a complete, double vaccine around the 27th of June. Good news, and earlier than previously expected. They'll be introducing vaccine passes/proofs too. Probably info that is comparable for several other EU countries as well.

Increased local restrictions also working so far, infections going down it seems, to maybe 50% of the maximum, though the numbers generally, and also fatalities at retirement homes, are still too high. However, we are waiting for the expected, worrying wave of more aggressive mutations. Travel restrictions in relation to abroad even more strict from today, travels of all sort everywhere outside the country are simply not recommended.

I had my first PCR virus test today, since it's necessary for visiting the doctor for another reason next week and has about 90-95% certainty. It took 2-3 minutes, plus a bike ride.

Luckily, family members and closer acquaintances have avoided virus sickness so far, touch-wood. But we've experienced other kinds of severe illness in 2020. And I've met colleagues who know of up to 15 cases among their acquaintances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 08, 2021, 11:12:32 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 08, 2021, 07:28:04 AM
Health authorities now saying here in DK that all inhabitants will have had the option of a complete, double vaccine around the 27th of June. Good news, and earlier than previously expected. They'll be introducing vaccine passes/proofs too. Probably info that is comparable for several other EU countries as well.

Increased local restrictions also working so far, infections going down it seems, to maybe 50% of the maximum, though the numbers generally, and also fatalities at retirement homes, are still too high. However, we are waiting for the expected, worrying wave of more aggressive mutations. Travel restrictions in relation to abroad even more strict from today, travels of all sort everywhere outside the country are simply not recommended.

I had my first PCR virus test today, since it's necessary for visiting the doctor for another reason next week and has about 90-95% certainty. It took 2-3 minutes, plus a bike ride.

Luckily, family members and closer acquaintances have avoided virus sickness so far, touch-wood. But we've experienced other kinds of severe illness in 2020. And I've met colleagues who know of up to 15 cases among their acquaintances.

Warm thoughts!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 08, 2021, 11:25:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 08, 2021, 11:12:32 AM
Warm thoughts!

Thank you, the same to everyone here. Things might be quite different in later 2021.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on January 08, 2021, 12:31:21 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 08, 2021, 07:28:04 AM
Health authorities now saying here in DK that all inhabitants will have had the option of a complete, double vaccine around the 27th of June. Good news, and earlier than previously expected. They'll be introducing vaccine passes/proofs too. Probably info that is comparable for several other EU countries as well.

Increased local restrictions also working so far, infections going down it seems, to maybe 50% of the maximum, though the numbers generally, and also fatalities at retirement homes, are still too high. However, we are waiting for the expected, worrying wave of more aggressive mutations. Travel restrictions in relation to abroad even more strict from today, travels of all sort everywhere outside the country are simply not recommended.

I had my first PCR virus test today, since it's necessary for visiting the doctor for another reason next week and has about 90-95% certainty. It took 2-3 minutes, plus a bike ride.

Luckily, family members and closer acquaintances have avoided virus sickness so far, touch-wood. But we've experienced other kinds of severe illness in 2020. And I've met colleagues who know of up to 15 cases among their acquaintances.

This resembles the situation in Belgium.
" The situation in our country has been improving for several weeks and is more favourable than in many other European countries.
The Consultative Committee has noted that the number of infections is gradually decreasing. Despite this general downward trend, the reproduction number is slightly rising again (Rt = 1.004). In addition, the number of intensive care admissions remains high.
However, according to the Consultative Committee, it is still too early to evaluate the possible impact of travellers returning from abroad, the festive season and the reopening of schools."
I will probably get my first vaccination in March. The ambition is to get 70% of the population vaccinated by the end of the summer. But will enough vaccine(s) be delivered on time?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 08, 2021, 12:44:50 PM
That is very, very good to hear, including also 1.004 and you & March. I'm aware of your earlier, high numbers in Belgium, that at times even seemed unlikely high by comparison? Has it been concluded that there were maybe also  some 'statistical/technical' or non-virus-related explanations for them, besides the virus in itself? I've heard that some immigrant+urban areas were severely hit, but only saw a couple of headlines about it ... (am not expecting you to write a long essay about it, of course  :) ...).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on January 08, 2021, 02:10:06 PM
https://www.healthybelgium.be/en/health-status/mortality-and-causes-of-death/covid-19-mortality

This link may help. it is too late for a "long essay"...

Peter
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 08, 2021, 05:29:04 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/08/us-flying-blindly-when-it-comes-to-new-covid-variant-says-doctor-.html

Dr. Ashish Jha, the Dean of Brown University's School of Public Health, warned "The News with Shepard Smith" that the United States is "flying blindly" and "guessing" when it comes to a highly transmissible new coronavirus variant in the country.   

"We don't know because we're not doing genomic sequencing of the virus in the way that the U.K. and other countries are," Jha said. "We have a ton of capacity to do sequencing, it's not like we can't do it. We just haven't and we've got to get our act together and start doing this so we can know if there's another variant circulating in our country."

The CDC issued a statement saying it has not seen the emergence of a highly contagious new U.S. variant of the coronavirus, unlike variants in the U.K. and South Africa. It noted, however, that there are probably many variants emerging across the globe.

Jha's statements come on the heels of reports from the White House coronavirus task force. It said there could be a new Covid variant that evolved within the U.S., is 50% more transmissible, and is propelling the spread, according to a document obtained by NBC News.

The U.S. recorded 4,085 deaths Wednesday, the first time the country topped 4,000 according to a CNBC analysis of Johns Hopkins data. Jha told host Shepard Smith that it's "stunning" as to why the U.S. has not done large-scale genomic sequencing of people infected with Covid, but noted that he was not "surprised" based on leadership from the White House.

"A White House that is disengaged, uninterested, and not helpful really, really does hamper the national response," Jha said in a Friday evening interview. "Some states are starting to pick up the slack, but it turns out in a pandemic, having the federal government is really useful."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 09, 2021, 01:29:59 AM
The whole thing is going sideways in a monumental way:

Novel cases in the EU in week 53:

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_full/public/images/novel-coronavirus-cases-EU-2020-week-53.png?itok=zDeqnBU-)

Infection rate on a weekly basis:

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/w52_53_COVID_subnational_Last_2week.png?itok=xl_hgipO)

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea

I see two major concerns:

1. An increased rate of spreading, that might outrun any vaccination efforts - which happen to go not very smoothly.
2. The continous appearance of mutations, with the risk of variants that are more contegeous, more dangerous or - and then the sh%t would really hit the fan - might render some or all of the current vaccines useless.

Call me a scaremonger, but I don't find current developments very reassuring....  ::)

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 09, 2021, 02:12:37 AM
The consensus here in DK is that the next two months will be hard; around the 1st of January they were thought to become probably the hardest ever, by almost everyone. But since then, the numbers of cases and hospitalizations have been going down, and the vaccine acknowledgments and buyings are coming faster than expected. It is still thought, that newly introduced, hard restrictions might have to continue until March. They include severe travel restrictions and recommendations. The UK and others are experiencing a rise in problems. But overall, new aggressive mutations do constitute the potentially biggest problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Rosalba on January 09, 2021, 02:16:47 AM
Quote from: Que on January 09, 2021, 01:29:59 AM
The whole thing is going sideways in a monumental way:

I see two major concerns:

1. An increased rate of spreading, that might outrun any vaccination efforts - which happen to go not very smoothly.
2. The continuous appearance of mutations, with the risk of variants that are more contagious, more dangerous or - and then the sh%t would really hit the fan - might render some or all of the current vaccines useless.

Call me a scaremonger, but I don't find current developments very reassuring....  ::)

Q

Sadly, I think you're right. However, the really high numbers are the result of Christmas and the New Year - the vaccines will pick up - and the warmer weather should bring some respite too. Even if we have to wear masks for years, ordinary life should improve - and even if nowhere near back to 'normal', it will seem like liberation.

So sorry about the large numbers dying. May they rest in peace. Love to their families and friends. Hanging in there, and wishing good to the world.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 05:00:58 AM
Quote from: Que on January 09, 2021, 01:29:59 AM


1. An increased rate of spreading, that might outrun any vaccination efforts - which happen to go not very smoothly.


Q

This is why the UK has decided to stagger the delay between jabs to three months. It is a real gamble, with unknown risks, potentially extremely serious risks, but we're in such dire straights that they felt there was no better alternative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 09, 2021, 05:13:43 AM
The standard response of any government world wide to an outbreak has been lockdown. Britain is in its third major lockdown (plus two smaller ones) and its obvious that this approach simply hasn't worked. Why? Is there an alternative that might be more effective?

Hopefully the vaccine roll out will make those two questions merely moot points.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 09, 2021, 06:41:11 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 09, 2021, 05:13:43 AM
The standard response of any government world wide to an outbreak has been lockdown. Britain is in its third major lockdown (plus two smaller ones) and its obvious that this approach simply hasn't worked. Why? Is there an alternative that might be more effective?

Hopefully the vaccine roll out will make those two questions merely moot points.

It is unclear whether you are thinking of Britain, or the world generally, regarding the effect of lock-downs ... Obviously, lock-downs have worked in many areas, including Scandinavia, where you have very good options for comparing lock-down versus non-lockdown strategies, in countries, that aren't so different from each other. The Swedes, having strived for herd immunity, are for example only now recommended to use masks in public transport, and masks aren't even obligatory there. This as a reaction to mounting problems there. Statistically they have had many more fatalities than the surrounding countries, and the hospital sector is much more stressed. As regards the number of infected, it's difficult to estimate, since their testing has been much more limited, but it must have been substantially higher - yet also far from any herd immunity effects occurring. Every time a lock-down has been enforced in DK, the problems have quickly been reduced, at least until now, before the expected arrival of the more aggressive mutations, that are now a problem in the UK.

My understanding is that regarding Asian countries, like China and South Korea, the effectiveness has very much been based on infection tracking and testing, and very strict lock-down and isolation policies, that are even more authoritarian, than we are used to in the West.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 07:10:04 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 09, 2021, 05:13:43 AM
The standard response of any government world wide to an outbreak has been lockdown. Britain is in its third major lockdown (plus two smaller ones) and its obvious that this approach simply hasn't worked. Why? Is there an alternative that might be more effective?

Hopefully the vaccine roll out will make those two questions merely moot points.

Lockdowns do work, if you look at the rate of hospital admissions after lockdown compared with the predicted course before, you see clearly that they are effective. And indeed it's not surprising given the way the virus is transmitted.

The problems are

1. Coming out of lockdown. How to do it so that it just doesn't take off again.

2. The new variants may be so much more transmissible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 07:51:25 AM
Can someone explain to me what exactly has gone on in New Zealand? Do they have a winning formula which other freedom loving democracies can follow?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 09, 2021, 11:52:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 07:51:25 AM
Can someone explain to me what exactly has gone on in New Zealand? Do they have a winning formula which other freedom loving democracies can follow?

NZs lockdown approach has been extreme (and overkill IMO). For a country who has no land borders containing the virus has been simple. Australia is in a similar position but its approach is somewhat compromised by the differing tactics of the eight state governments which have been varied to say the least. In at least two of those states, state elections, as opposed to common sense, has been the driving factor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 09, 2021, 02:00:30 PM
"Extreme" how? "Overkill" (now there's a poor choice of words) how? Its true that it helps that our border in a huge ocean, but there are plenty of other island nations who haven't found that enough on its own to stop the spread.

I could say some stuff about us having a better sense of community responsibility than I've seen elsewhere, more faith in government and health experts than I've seen elsewhere, and a subtly different notion of what "freedom" means - especially short-term vs long-term. And while all those things may have an element of truth really the success to date here has been one of leadership and trust, and with different leadership but the same population we may have had a very different outcome. A fact that was loudly acknowledged at the last election.

But anyway its to early for anyone to pat themselves on the back - as the govt continues to make clear to us. There's still the very real possibility here that some drongo will sneak out of managed isolation (which has happened on a number of occasions despite security) and start a community transmission that can't be halted with a localized lockdown
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 09, 2021, 03:34:56 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 09, 2021, 02:00:30 PM
"Extreme" how? "Overkill" (now there's a poor choice of words) how? Its true that it helps that our border in a huge ocean, but there are plenty of other island nations who haven't found that enough on its own to stop the spread.

I could say some stuff about us having a better sense of community responsibility than I've seen elsewhere, more faith in government and health experts than I've seen elsewhere, and a subtly different notion of what "freedom" means - especially short-term vs long-term. And while all those things may have an element of truth really the success to date here has been one of leadership and trust, and with different leadership but the same population we may have had a very different outcome. A fact that was loudly acknowledged at the last election.

But anyway its to early for anyone to pat themselves on the back - as the govt continues to make clear to us. There's still the very real possibility here that some drongo will sneak out of managed isolation (which has happened on a number of occasions despite security) and start a community transmission that can't be halted with a localized lockdown

Simon, I couldn't agree more about the average NZers excellent response to dealing with the pandemic which is one of the reasons I think that the NZ Govt's response was draconian to say the least. Everything they asked Kiwis to do, they did. This means that a more considered response (like we had here in Qld) with looser restrictions would have had exactly the same result. Total deaths here in Qld which has the same population as NZ is six. We did this without clearing the streets and getting everyone to totally lock down.

From another perspective, this article I am going to paste below looks at a different and very successful response. Is there a lesson here for us in the western world?


WHEN THE Diamond Princess, a cruise ship suffering from an outbreak of covid-19, arrived in Japan in February, it seemed like a stroke of bad luck. A small floating petri dish threatened to turn the Japanese archipelago into a big one. In retrospect, however, the early exposure taught the authorities lessons that have helped make Japan's epidemic the mildest among the world's big economies, despite a recent surge in infections. In total 2,487 people have died of the coronavirus in Japan, just over half the number in China and fewer people than on a single day in America several times over the past week. Japan has suffered just 18 deaths per million people, a higher rate than in China, but by far the lowest in the G7, a club of big, industrialised democracies. (Germany comes in second, at 239.) Most strikingly, Japan has achieved this success without strict lockdowns or mass testing—the main weapons in the battle against covid-19 elsewhere.
"From the beginning we did not aim at containment," says Oshitani Hitoshi, a virologist who sits on an expert panel advising the government. That would require identifying all possible cases, which is not feasible in a country of Japan's size when the majority of infections produce mild or no symptoms, argues Mr Oshitani: "Even if you test everyone once per week, you'll still miss some." Japan performs the fewest tests in the G7: an average of 270 a day for every million people, compared with 4,000 or so in America and Britain (see chart).
Instead, the government tried to apply the lessons of the Diamond Princess. After trained quarantine officers and nurses were infected aboard the ship, despite following protocols for viruses that spread through droplets, Mr Oshitani's team concluded that the virus spread through the air. As early as March, Japanese officials began warning citizens to avoid the san-mitsu or "3Cs": closed spaces, crowded places and close-contact settings. The phrase was blasted across traditional and social media. Surveys conducted in the spring found that a big majority were avoiding 3C settings. The publishing house Jiyukokuminsha recently declared it "buzzword of the year" for 2020.
The Diamond Princess also inspired an early focus on clusters. The government set up a cluster-busting taskforce in March.
These insights allowed the authorities to make granular distinctions about risks, opting for targeted restrictions rather than swinging between the extremes of strict lockdowns and free-for-all openings. Nishimura Yasutoshi, the minister overseeing the government's response to covid-19, carries a device that monitors carbon dioxide to measure the quality of ventilation during his meetings. (The room where he and your correspondent meet registers 506 parts per million, safely below the threshold of 1000 ppm that indicates poor air flow. The interview takes place across a large table, behind plastic shields and with face masks on.)
Researchers deployed Fugaku, the world's fastest supercomputer, to model different situations. Crowded subways pose little risk, if windows are open and passengers wear masks, Mr Nishimura insists. Sitting diagonally, rather than directly across from each other can reduce the risk of infection by 75%. Movie theatres are safe, "even if viewers are eating popcorn and hot dogs", Mr Nishimura says. While most cinemas in the West are closed, "Demon Slayer", a new animeflick, has been playing to full houses in Japan, becoming the country's second-highest grossing film ever. In addition to the 3Cs, the Japanese government warns of five more specific dangers: dinner parties with booze; drinking and eating in groups of more than four; talking without masks at close quarters; living in dormitories and other small shared spaces; and using changing or break rooms.
Of course, these insights would have been for naught if ordinary people had ignored them. But Japanese heeded the government's advice to stay home and to quarantine if showing any symptoms of the coronavirus, even though these admonitions carried no legal force. "Sometimes we are criticised for being an overly homogeneous society, but I think it played a positive role this time," Mr Nishimura says. And already spick-and-span Japan became even more punctilious about hygiene. While Americans argued over whether face coverings were an assault on personal freedom, Japanese lined up outside Uniqlo for the release of its new line of masks. During the first ten weeks of flu season this autumn, Japan saw just 148 cases of common influenza, or less than 1% of the five-year average for the same period (17,000).
Better yet, although the population of Japan is disproportionally elderly, and therefore potentially more vulnerable to covid-19, it is also very healthy. Only 4.2% of Japanese adults are obese, a condition known to make the disease more lethal. That is the lowest rate in the OECD and a tenth of America's. Japan also has a good health-care system, with universal coverage and lots of well-equipped hospitals. It even had lots of already trained contact-tracers, part of an established public-health network dating back to the 1930s.
These advantages clearly have their limits. The virus has spread rapidly in recent weeks, reaching record highs in terms both of daily cases and daily deaths. The government has had to dispatch medical personnel from the Self-Defence Forces to shore up hospitals in the worst-hit spots. But at the same time it has discouraged caution with a scheme that subsidises domestic tourism and meals out, in an effort to help the economy. Although this seems to have contributed to covid-19's recent spread, the government has only curbed it rather than scrapping it. And cold weather is now pushing people into 3C spaces, as it has been across the northern hemisphere. But in Japan, at least, the recent growth in the number of cases has started from a dramatically lower base.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 07:35:12 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 09, 2021, 02:00:30 PM
"Extreme" how? "Overkill" (now there's a poor choice of words) how? Its true that it helps that our border in a huge ocean, but there are plenty of other island nations who haven't found that enough on its own to stop the spread.

I could say some stuff about us having a better sense of community responsibility than I've seen elsewhere, more faith in government and health experts than I've seen elsewhere, and a subtly different notion of what "freedom" means - especially short-term vs long-term. And while all those things may have an element of truth really the success to date here has been one of leadership and trust, and with different leadership but the same population we may have had a very different outcome. A fact that was loudly acknowledged at the last election.

But anyway its to early for anyone to pat themselves on the back - as the govt continues to make clear to us. There's still the very real possibility here that some drongo will sneak out of managed isolation (which has happened on a number of occasions despite security) and start a community transmission that can't be halted with a localized lockdown

Warning. This post is the Spanish Inquisition. Just ignore if annoyed!


1. Where contacts without symptoms tested? What sort of test? How did they get the test? (In the post or at a centre - if the latter, what if they lived very far from the centre?)

2. Were positive contacts asked to self isolate? How were they supported for the loss of earnings? How were they supported for things like getting the groceries? What happened if their living conditions were too cramped to allow them to self isolate? You mention managed isolation - what is it exactly?  How was self isolation policed?

3. Did key workers work when you confined? Did vulnerable children go to school? If so, how did you define a key worker and a vulnerable child?

4. How did people with symptoms get tested - if they lived far from a test centre? Did they give contacts voluntarily? What percentage of their contacts were traced?

5. What were the requirements for distancing on public transport? In retail outlets? In schools when they returned? In work places? We're there any special requirements for ventilation? How was all this policed?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 10, 2021, 01:19:45 AM
I'll try to answer some of that but I'm going to need some time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on January 10, 2021, 03:32:07 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 09, 2021, 07:51:25 AM
Can someone explain to me what exactly has gone on in New Zealand? Do they have a winning formula which other freedom loving democracies can follow?

One thing to remember is it's summertime at the moment in New Zealand and that helps. Isolation, competent leaders, well-functioning democracy avoid of corruption and rational population and good corona strategy explain most of it I believe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brass Hole on January 10, 2021, 04:50:53 AM
Has anyone here been inoculated? Is there a member from Sweden. I'm hearing about some skepticism even resistance in some parts of Europe, especially after the fast-track vaccine failure in 2009
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 10, 2021, 05:13:46 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 10, 2021, 01:19:45 AM
I'll try to answer some of that but I'm going to need some time.

Thanks. The problem is to fully understand why it has worked and how transferable it is, it's not easy to find the details through google, though they are online somewhere I'm sure. The details are what matter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 10, 2021, 09:46:57 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-10/lawmakers-exposed-to-covid-19-during-attack-physician-says

January 10, 2021, 12:15 PM EST


Lawmakers may have been exposed to the coronavirus while they were held in a secure room during Wednesday's attack on Congress, the Capitol's attending physician said Sunday.

"Many members of the House community were in protective isolation in room located in a large committee hearing space," physician Brian Monahan said in a statement. "During this time, individuals may have been exposed to another occupant with coronavirus infection."

While Monahan's statement didn't specify which room, one video showed dozens of people sheltered in place a committee room in the (sic) as a mob of President Donald Trump's supporters stormed into the Capitol, forcing their way into the House and Senate chambers, lawmakers' offices, and other areas.

The video showed Delaware Democrat Lisa Blunt Rochester offering masks to a group of Republicans, including Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene [The QAnon disgrace - TD] of Georgia and Andy Biggs of Arizona, who refused to cover their faces.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brian on January 10, 2021, 01:27:36 PM
Quote from: Brass Hole on January 10, 2021, 04:50:53 AM
Has anyone here been inoculated?
My girlfriend got the vaccine December 29 (in Texas). She had some side effects and slept very hard the rest of the week while her immune system responded. We are now at about 2% of the local population inoculated.

I was just checking this thread to see if other people on GMG had gotten the shot - or gotten the disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brass Hole on January 11, 2021, 12:01:51 AM
Quote from: Brian on January 10, 2021, 01:27:36 PM
My girlfriend got the vaccine December 29 (in Texas). She had some side effects and slept very hard the rest of the week while her immune system responded. We are now at about 2% of the local population inoculated.

I was just checking this thread to see if other people on GMG had gotten the shot - or gotten the disease.

Great to hear that. Yes, it says 6.7 million as of last Friday. Is the date set for her second?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 11, 2021, 04:16:24 AM
After Unused Vaccines Are Thrown in Trash, Cuomo Loosens Rules

Now, employees who interact with the public, including pharmacy cashiers, qualify. It was the second time in two days that the state amended its rules. (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/10/nyregion/new-york-vaccine-guidelines.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on January 11, 2021, 05:44:15 AM
We are not getting vaccines as fast as expected into the country. So far only about 20.000 Finns have been vaccinated. That's about 0.4 % of the population. Meanwhile Israel has managed to get over 10 % of their population vaccinated.  ??? They are hoping the speed going up in February. It's up the to vaccine manufacturers being able to deliver what has been ordered.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brian on January 11, 2021, 05:49:58 AM
Quote from: Brass Hole on January 11, 2021, 12:01:51 AM
Great to hear that. Yes, it says 6.7 million as of last Friday. Is the date set for her second?
The date will be set this week, they are contacting her by email today or tomorrow and I think they will give her a set time rather than a choice of times. (Honestly, if it were me, I would plan my whole day around any time they wanted! Her first shot was administered at 9:30pm because that was the only time left on the schedule.) It should be around January 26-28.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 11, 2021, 07:11:36 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on January 11, 2021, 05:44:15 AM
We are not getting vaccines as fast as expected into the country. So far only about 20.000 Finns have been vaccinated. That's about 0.4 % of the population. Meanwhile Israel has managed to get over 10 % of their population vaccinated.  ??? They are hoping the speed going up in February. It's up the to vaccine manufacturers being able to deliver what has been ordered.

Simple, money. Israel is paying Pfizer 40% more for vaccine then US and Europe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 12, 2021, 10:25:04 AM
This may seem a small point in light of the bigger picture, but I find this (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-55623289) really disappointing/incomprehensible.

With things going crazy at the moment in the UK with the new Covid variant, some people are still choosing to be pointlessly obnoxious to supermarket staff, and reckless with everybody's health, by not wearing masks and getting abusive when asked to. I have no idea if they are of the ludicrous Covid-isn't-real persuasion, or just ignorant, but it doesn't matter, in current circumstances it just seems odiously selfish.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 12, 2021, 10:55:31 AM
Quote from: Iota on January 12, 2021, 10:25:04 AM
This may seem a small point in light of the bigger picture, but I find this (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-55623289) really disappointing/incomprehensible.

With things going crazy at the moment in the UK with the new Covid variant, some people are still choosing to be pointlessly obnoxious to supermarket staff, and reckless with everybody's health, by not wearing masks and getting abusive when asked to. I have no idea if they are of the ludicrous Covid-isn't-real persuasion, or just ignorant, but it doesn't matter, in current circumstances it just seems odiously selfish.

This kind of behavior is rampant here in the US where ignorance must be bliss. I say there should be steep fine for anyone is not wearing a mask. The first offense is $600 (their government COVID stimulus money ::)) and the second fine will be $1,000. The third would be a $4,000 fine and 24 hrs. in jail with no bond. And God help us if it gets past the second or even third offense, the fourth offense would be $10,000 fine, 24 hrs. in jail plus 80 hrs. (the equivalent of two full-time work weeks in the US) of community service.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 12, 2021, 08:19:16 PM
Quote from: Iota on January 12, 2021, 10:25:04 AM
This may seem a small point in light of the bigger picture, but I find this (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-55623289) really disappointing/incomprehensible.

With things going crazy at the moment in the UK with the new Covid variant, some people are still choosing to be pointlessly obnoxious to supermarket staff, and reckless with everybody's health, by not wearing masks and getting abusive when asked to. I have no idea if they are of the ludicrous Covid-isn't-real persuasion, or just ignorant, but it doesn't matter, in current circumstances it just seems odiously selfish.

Well you have to remember that the sort of dirt old face rags that people actually use may be pretty ineffective at best, and actually do more harm than good at worse. Especially against the British mutant killer variant. It's interesting that masks have become so fetishised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 13, 2021, 07:36:03 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/13/ohio-researchers-say-theyve-identified-two-new-covid-strains-likely-originating-in-the-us.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on January 13, 2021, 07:57:31 AM
Quote from: Iota on January 12, 2021, 10:25:04 AM
This may seem a small point in light of the bigger picture, but I find this (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-55623289) really disappointing/incomprehensible.

With things going crazy at the moment in the UK with the new Covid variant, some people are still choosing to be pointlessly obnoxious to supermarket staff, and reckless with everybody's health, by not wearing masks and getting abusive when asked to. I have no idea if they are of the ludicrous Covid-isn't-real persuasion, or just ignorant, but it doesn't matter, in current circumstances it just seems odiously selfish.

Some people have always been obnoxious to anyone who has to deal with the public. Where I live there is a high percentage of retired people who have had a lifetime of talking down to the lower orders. They were rude and arrogant before the pandemic and will continue to be so after it is over. It is not just retired people but widespread, so much so people from out of town notice it.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 13, 2021, 08:02:43 AM
Restrictions here in DK now prolonged to the 7th of February. So it'll be at least 6 weeks this time ...

Infections still going down, but there are many fatalities these days, due to the rise in mid-December, 20-40 per day.
The general infection factor of transmission is now down to 0.9, but they'd like it to get down to 0.6, to better fight oncoming virus types. They'll be testing all infected people for the aggressive virus types, a good idea for mapping and fighting developments.

The special mink virus types, mentioned earlier, in 2020, seem to have died out now.

In Germany, talks about prolonging the restrictions for no less than 10 weeks ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on January 14, 2021, 05:43:27 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 12, 2021, 10:55:31 AM
This kind of behavior is rampant here in the US where ignorance must be bliss. I say there should be steep fine for anyone is not wearing a mask. The first offense is $600 (their government COVID stimulus money ::)) and the second fine will be $1,000. The third would be a $4,000 fine and 24 hrs. in jail with no bond. And God help us if it gets past the second or even third offense, the fourth offense would be $10,000 fine, 24 hrs. in jail plus 80 hrs. (the equivalent of two full-time work weeks in the US) of community service.

Rampant no doubt. On the other hand, where I live, in a district of upstate New York that largely supported Trump, mask wearing has been nearly universal. All of my friends and neighbors who voted for Trump wear masks without complaint.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 14, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty's men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health o their elders!

Samuel Pepys Diaries
London 1664.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2021, 07:44:51 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 14, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty's men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health o their elders!

Samuel Pepys Diaries
London 1664.
Wow!  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 14, 2021, 08:13:54 AM
Quote from: Biffo on January 13, 2021, 07:57:31 AM
Some people have always been obnoxious to anyone who has to deal with the public. Where I live there is a high percentage of retired people who have had a lifetime of talking down to the lower orders. They were rude and arrogant before the pandemic and will continue to be so after it is over.

Seems such people are unaware, that it is them that are distinctly the lower orders.

Quote from: Irons on January 14, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty's men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health o their elders!

Samuel Pepys Diaries
London 1664.

Saw that one circulating during the first lockdown, Plus ca change etc. ..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 14, 2021, 11:10:29 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 14, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty's men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health o their elders!

Samuel Pepys Diaries
London 1664.

Here's a video of Her Majesty's men urging a gaggle of striplings into their lodgings, 2021 style

https://mobile.twitter.com/ukhomeoffice/status/1349725457143394305

And here's a video of Londoners doing what Her Majesty's men request and require this morning, going to work


https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCTomEdwards/status/1349650712444203008

I can't help feel that there's a conclusion to be drawn, not sure what. Over to you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 14, 2021, 11:32:17 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 14, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty's men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health o their elders!

Samuel Pepys Diaries
London 1664.

Nihil novum sub sole...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 14, 2021, 11:53:30 AM
I didn't recognize that from Pepys Diary and the year seems wrong - the really serious plague stuff is in 1665.

Sorry, but its from a parody twitter account account @Pepys-Diaries.

https://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/301/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 14, 2021, 11:56:25 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 14, 2021, 11:53:30 AM
I didn't recognize that from Pepys Diary and the year seems wrong - the really serious plague stuff is in 1665.

Sorry, but its from a parody twitter account account @Pepys-Diaries.

https://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/301/

Se non è vero, è ben trovato!...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 14, 2021, 12:08:21 PM
Yes. If I were on Twitter I'd probably follow it.

(Also it wouldn't be Her Majestys Men during the reign of Charles II)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on January 14, 2021, 02:59:49 PM
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/511R1tjumnL.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 15, 2021, 12:23:26 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 14, 2021, 11:53:30 AM
I didn't recognize that from Pepys Diary and the year seems wrong - the really serious plague stuff is in 1665.

Sorry, but its from a parody twitter account account @Pepys-Diaries.

https://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/301/

The power of the internet to spread false information. WhatsApp in this case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 15, 2021, 03:35:00 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-15/norway-warns-of-vaccination-risks-for-sick-patients-over-80

Norway said Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill, the most cautious statement yet from a European health authority as countries assess the real-world side effects of the first shots to gain approval.

Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have so far been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to severe reactions in frail, elderly people, according to the Norwegian Medicines Agency.

"For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences," the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said. "For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 15, 2021, 04:18:09 AM
Not good. First time I hear about this. However, from what's been told, the various & oncoming vaccines should also be quite different from each other, some of them being adjustable for various functions, properties and target groups etc. For instance, pregnant women is another area of concern.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 15, 2021, 08:59:26 AM
Quote from: T. D. on January 15, 2021, 03:35:00 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-15/norway-warns-of-vaccination-risks-for-sick-patients-over-80

Norway said Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill, the most cautious statement yet from a European health authority as countries assess the real-world side effects of the first shots to gain approval.

Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have so far been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to severe reactions in frail, elderly people, according to the Norwegian Medicines Agency.

"For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences," the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said. "For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant."

I'd be keen to know if anyone has any more information on this, what sort of preexisting conditions did they have? I've heard nothing about it in the UK, and we've vaccinated a lot of people. There must be cases here and in Israel and elsewhere,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2021, 11:36:16 AM
Despite Trump administration promise, there appear to be no more 'reserve' 2nd vaccine doses to release

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/15/politics/coronavirus-vaccine-reserve-dose/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 16, 2021, 04:27:41 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/61fHWbS/thong.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 16, 2021, 04:28:35 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 16, 2021, 11:24:57 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/16/covid-vaccine-black-people-unlikely-covid-jab-uk

72% of black people say they're unlikely to take the vaccine if offered. Any thoughts about why? Is it the same in other countries?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 16, 2021, 02:01:38 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 16, 2021, 11:24:57 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/16/covid-vaccine-black-people-unlikely-covid-jab-uk

72% of black people say they're unlikely to take the vaccine if offered. Any thoughts about why? Is it the same in other countries?


Fueled by a History of Mistreatment, Black Americans Distrust the New COVID-19 Vaccines (https://time.com/5925074/black-americans-covid-19-vaccine-distrust/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 16, 2021, 08:23:34 PM
Yes I saw that after I posted here last night.

It's clear that this crisis is revealing the deep inequalities in our society, inequalities which in the UK no political party has been interested in dealing with. The poor are more susceptible to catching COVID because of their public facing jobs and their crowded multi generational living conditions. They are the ones who can least afford to stop working if they're ill or are a contact of someone who's ill. Blacks are wary of the vaccine because they have been treated with contempt by the health system.

And yet all the parties in the UK, and the media, are working hard to focus the debate on how to return to things as they were before. No party is bold enough to use the lessons of the crisis as a vehicle for radical social change. If they get their way, the  poor will continue to work in precarious jobs with low sick pay, and to live in crowded conditions in housing with exploitative rent.

The thing that annoys me the most is no one is clamouring for change - least of all those who need it. The left is weak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 17, 2021, 02:28:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 16, 2021, 08:23:34 PM
Yes I saw that after I posted here last night.

It's clear that this crisis is revealing the deep inequalities in our society, inequalities which in the UK no political party has been interested in dealing with. The poor are more susceptible to catching COVID because of their public facing jobs and their crowded multi generational living conditions. They are the ones who can least afford to stop working if they're ill or are a contact of someone who's ill. Blacks are wary of the vaccine because they have been treated with contempt by the health system.

And yet all the parties in the UK, and the media, are working hard to focus the debate on how to return to things as they were before. No party is bold enough to use the lessons of the crisis as a vehicle for radical social change. If they get their way, the  poor will continue to work in precarious jobs with low sick pay, and to live in crowded conditions in housing with exploitative rent.

The thing that annoys me the most is no one is clamouring for change - least of all those who need it. The left is weak.

Putting politics aside for a moment, I agree with some of your points, with others not so much. I know Newham in the East End quite well and it is true that there are street after street of small terraced houses with multi-generations living under one roof which is facilitating the spread of Covid. Unlike most Brits, which think it OK to stick their old and infirm in care homes - out of sight out of mind - and demand the Government pay for it, the Asian population are very family caring which is a positive until Covid came along. A lifestyle choice, not caused by poverty.
I don't know why anyone would be wary of the vaccine, black, white or whoever. I think the UK is waking up to the evil of racial discrimination, compared to other nations we are improving. I put it to you - who is the biggest gamechanger in British society in the last six months? Marcus Rashford is in with a shout, and of course he is a black man.
I think it shameful so deaths by Covid of public transport workers.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 17, 2021, 03:54:27 AM
Some good news - the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, apparently 90% effective, is expected to be approved in mid-February in the EU, and it only requires one shot ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2021, 05:26:36 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 17, 2021, 03:54:27 AM
Some good news - the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, apparently 90% effective, is expected to be approved in mid-February in the EU, and it only requires one shot ...
Excellent news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on January 17, 2021, 08:57:14 PM
One should not underestimate that the Republican Party that is dominated by fundamentalists Christians who are anti-science.

It is ironic that the science that they hate is producing the vaccines that will save us. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 18, 2021, 12:26:32 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on January 17, 2021, 08:57:14 PM
One should not underestimate that the Republican Party that is dominated by fundamentalists Christians who are anti-science.


Is this really true?

America is an alien place to me, another planet. My parents - who experienced Roosevelt's lend-lease programme in the UK - used to say that what happens in America happens in the UK shortly afterwards. If a major party is dominated by religious nutters then I hope they were wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2021, 03:02:37 AM
On the news lately here in the United States:  it appears that there is/was no promised reserve of 2nd doses of Covid-19 vaccines at the Federal level.  Some states apparently are better off than others in terms of their own state-stock levels though.

Wondering whether or not we'll be able to get more of it and to the areas and people who need to get their second round of shots in time?  And how long will it take for us to get more bottles of the vaccine(s) period?  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 20, 2021, 06:38:51 AM
Media reporting here in DK that the UK virus type B117 seems less aggressive than feared, but the statistical evidence for this is not complete yet.

Still a positive development here in DK, compared to late 2020, except from too many fatalities at the homes for the elderly, now being investigated. Restrictions work. However, a delay of some of the Pfizer vaccines, of a couple of weeks. But the oncoming J&J and Astra Zeneca vaccines will contribute positively.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 08:10:38 AM
My sister ( the oldest of my three younger sisters, and so closest to me in age) tested positive a few days ago. She feels like hell, although she says her experience is basically like an especially nasty flu. My brother-in-law and nephew show no symptoms but are quarantining, of course. Her doc called, and she is going into the hospital this afternoon for an infusion of antibodies, to keep the symptoms from worsening.  She will lick this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on January 21, 2021, 08:22:14 AM
Sorry to hear, Karl. Wishing her a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 08:53:15 AM
Warm thanks, Karlo!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 21, 2021, 09:18:30 AM
All strength to you and your sister Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 21, 2021, 09:32:28 AM
Quote from: North Star on January 21, 2021, 08:22:14 AM
Sorry to hear, Karl. Wishing her a speedy recovery.

+1, best wishes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 09:33:20 AM
Thanks, gents!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 21, 2021, 12:04:04 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2021, 08:10:38 AM
My sister ( the oldest of my three younger sisters, and so closest to me in age) tested positive a few days ago. She feels like hell, although she says her experience is basically like an especially nasty flu. My brother-in-law and nephew show no symptoms but are quarantining, of course. Her doc called, and she is going into the hospital this afternoon for an infusion of antibodies, to keep the symptoms from worsening.  She will lick this.

Just like her elder brother did. Sending good vibes.  :-*
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on January 21, 2021, 01:01:53 PM
So sorry to hear about the corona news about your sister Karl. Wishing a fast recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on January 21, 2021, 01:09:09 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on January 17, 2021, 08:57:14 PM
One should not underestimate that the Republican Party that is dominated by fundamentalists Christians who are anti-science.

It is ironic that the science that they hate is producing the vaccines that will save us.

Why would anti-science fundamentalists Christians want "us" saved? They want rapture, a big war that destroys Israel and so forth... ...we sane science-believers are an obstacle for them to reach that goal.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 01:22:52 PM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2021, 12:04:04 PM
Just like her elder brother did. Sending good vibes.  :-*

Merci!

She's back home from hospital. For these patients/this procedure they had zip tents set up in the parking lot, she joked that it was like being on the set for M*A*S*H. I said, "Did you ask the nurse if her name was Houlihan?" The infusion was via IV, they kept her to mind her vitals for an hour, the doctor said she would mend quickly now, and discharged her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 01:23:47 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on January 21, 2021, 01:01:53 PM
So sorry to hear about the corona news about your sister Karl. Wishing a fast recovery.

Kiitos!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 21, 2021, 01:52:01 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2021, 01:22:52 PM
Merci!

She's back home from hospital. For these patients/this procedure they had zip tents set up in the parking lot, she joked that it was like being on the set for M*A*S*H. I said, "Did you ask the nurse if her name was Houlihan?" The infusion was via IV, they kept her to mind her vitals for an hour, the doctor said she would mend quickly now, and discharged her.

Seems promising. Hope the best for her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2021, 01:59:00 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2021, 08:10:38 AM
My sister ( the oldest of my three younger sisters, and so closest to me in age) tested positive a few days ago. She feels like hell, although she says her experience is basically like an especially nasty flu. My brother-in-law and nephew show no symptoms but are quarantining, of course. Her doc called, and she is going into the hospital this afternoon for an infusion of antibodies, to keep the symptoms from worsening.  She will lick this.
I'm so sorry to hear this Karl.  I wish her a speedy recovery and will be thinking of all of you.

With love,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 02:27:04 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2021, 01:59:00 PM
I'm so sorry to hear this Karl.  I wish her a speedy recovery and will be thinking of all of you.

With love,

PD

Warm thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2021, 02:27:39 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 21, 2021, 01:52:01 PM
Seems promising. Hope the best for her.

Thank you!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 22, 2021, 05:39:52 AM
Progress, but things need to pick up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 22, 2021, 05:48:22 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2021, 08:10:38 AM
My sister ( the oldest of my three younger sisters, and so closest to me in age) tested positive a few days ago. She feels like hell, although she says her experience is basically like an especially nasty flu. My brother-in-law and nephew show no symptoms but are quarantining, of course. Her doc called, and she is going into the hospital this afternoon for an infusion of antibodies, to keep the symptoms from worsening.  She will lick this.

Wishing your sister a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 22, 2021, 06:36:45 AM
- a new test-yourself-at-home from the US is said to have a 80-92% certainty and a result within a few minutes. When in more common use, it will have decidedly positive, logistic effects. The 90% certainty is for people with symptoms.

- as could be expected, vaccine scepticism often goes down, once vaccines are starting to become implemented. Now the willing percentage is around 85-87% here in DK, with 5-7% against. Earlier, it was around 80%.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 22, 2021, 07:44:45 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 22, 2021, 05:48:22 AM
Wishing your sister a speedy recovery.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on January 22, 2021, 08:48:23 AM
Sniffer dogs could be used to detect people infected with coronavirus

https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/125909/sniffer-dogs-could-be-used-to-detect-people-infected-with-coronavirus/
and now:
https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/150589/trainee-coronavirus-sniffer-dogs-will-graduate-in-february/
"Some months on, and the 11 dogs taking part in the trial are ready to line up and get their degrees. Their number is made up mainly of Malinois, spaniels and Border collies, and one beagle."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 22, 2021, 08:51:56 AM
Quote from: pjme on January 22, 2021, 08:48:23 AM
Sniffer dogs could be used to detect people infected with coronavirus

https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/125909/sniffer-dogs-could-be-used-to-detect-people-infected-with-coronavirus/
and now:
https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/150589/trainee-coronavirus-sniffer-dogs-will-graduate-in-february/
"Some months on, and the 11 dogs taking part in the trial are ready to line up and get their degrees. Their number is made up mainly of Malinois, spaniels and Border collies, and one beagle."
Wow!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on January 22, 2021, 09:01:24 AM
And this - for all who suffer:

Since mid-June 2020, Festivals for Compassion has been uniting festivals in Europe and beyond. Each shared their interpretation of Calliope Tsoupaki's new solo composition Thin Air as an ode to compassion and an act of solidarity in these troubled times.

We were proud to commission Tsoupaki, one of the Netherlands' most celebrated composers, to create Thin Air, a piece that can be performed by any instrument and voice. It was premiered during the Holland Festival on the Dutch NPO Radio 4 on 20 June, with the Flemish radio station Klara taking over the next day.

After this, like a relay race of compassion, the work began its journey through Europe traveling from festival to festival. More than 50 partners have joined the race so far, including the Edinburgh International Festival, Helsinki Festival, Utrecht Early Music Festival, Operadagen Rotterdam, and the Thüringer Bachwochen. Up until now, a range of players and singers have created over 25 renditions of Thin Air to be shared with a worldwide, online audience, with you.

Festivals for Compassion is meant, quoting the Canadian festival Music on Main, 'to strike a chord with artists and audiences alike: a quiet moment of generosity and compassion right when so many need these qualities most.'

Thank you for coming with us on our journey & keep safe.

https://festivalsforcompassion.com/timeline/

https://www.youtube.com/v/MjYLz4aU4JU

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 22, 2021, 09:06:51 AM
Just drove past the local doctor's surgery with a huge queue of elderly people (myself not included, I'd like to point out) clearly waiting for their first Covid vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 22, 2021, 09:10:18 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/22/boris-johnson-evidence-new-covid-variant-associated-with-higher-mortality-.html

Boris Johnson says some evidence new Covid variant in the UK may be more deadly
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 22, 2021, 09:33:15 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 22, 2021, 09:06:51 AM
Just drove past the local doctor's surgery with a huge queue of elderly people (myself not included, I'd like to point out) clearly waiting for their first Covid vaccination.
Glad that there are starting to vaccinate in your area Jeffrey.  Any idea when you will be able to get one?
Quote from: T. D. on January 22, 2021, 09:10:18 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/22/boris-johnson-evidence-new-covid-variant-associated-with-higher-mortality-.html

Boris Johnson says some evidence new Covid variant in the UK may be more deadly
Heard a day or two ago about there also being a nasty strain in South Africa and Brazil too.

Out of curiosity, are any countries besides the US handing out economic stimulus checks?  And, if so, do you think that they are helping very much?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on January 22, 2021, 09:54:43 AM
Quote from: pjme on January 22, 2021, 09:01:24 AM
'to strike a chord with artists and audiences alike'

https://www.youtube.com/v/MjYLz4aU4JU

I came bottom of the class in music but can you actually strike a chord with a horn? :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 22, 2021, 11:51:15 AM
Very disturbing press conference from 10 Downing Street

https://www.youtube.com/v/iCrHEK_00Gk&ab_channel=10DowningStreet
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 23, 2021, 01:13:08 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 22, 2021, 09:06:51 AM
Just drove past the local doctor's surgery with a huge queue of elderly people (myself not included, I'd like to point out) clearly waiting for their first Covid vaccination.

Surprisingly our local medical centre are not partaking. When due our jab will be given at Epsom Racecourse.

Anyone in the UK can by clicking here  https://www.omnicalculator.com/health/vaccine-queue-uk  find out when they will be called. I come into old fart category so due early next month.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 23, 2021, 02:28:58 AM
The vaccination here, in the Netherlands, has barely started...

A combination of ordering late, organizing late, continious shifts in priority and mismanagement due to several "reforms" of the healthcare system by the neoliberal governments of the past decade...

Since I'm under 60 and perfectly healthy, I'm lucky if I would get my shot late this summer.
Though the timelines on when Western countries will have this under control are continously shifting backwards anyway...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 23, 2021, 02:45:42 AM
- there's a real lot of talk about vaccines being delayed here in DK (Pfizer, Astra Zeneca) but in reality it seems to be only for a few weeks, and media are not really mentioning the other vaccines that will be coming quite soon, such as Johnson & Johnson.

- Local scandal here: some Money People/influencers/celebrities/Nouveau Riches vacationing in Dubai, a resort country that has opened up for tourism. This in spite of the official Danish recommendations of not going abroad. Now it turns out, that Dubai's testing before people going back to DK has been very poor, and 33 travellers were found infected when coming back, in spite of having negative tests from their Dubai departure. Including bringing new aggressive mutations with them. As a result, all Dubai flights have now been immediately cancelled, within an hour's notice or so.

- Hungary's approval of the Russian Sputnik V vaccine endangers the unity of a common EU vaccine policy, since, if the vaccine isn't effective enough, the virus may exist and spread anyway within the borderless EU, or the Sputnik V will complicate the release of any common vaccine passes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 23, 2021, 06:26:01 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 23, 2021, 01:13:08 AM
Surprisingly our local medical centre are not partaking. When due our jab will be given at Epsom Racecourse.

Anyone in the UK can by clicking here  https://www.omnicalculator.com/health/vaccine-queue-uk  find out when they will be called. I come into old fart category so due early next month.  :P
The local surgery was on the front of the Times today as they were mistakenly delivered a double consignment of vaccines and were told that they were not allowed to be transported anywhere else - so they worked all night to make sure that not a single dose was wasted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 06:27:27 AM
Nearly 500,000 jabs in the UK yesterday.

https://twitter.com/hugogye/status/1352984314229764096?s=21

It just shows how competent and talented Boris Johnson's government is. They could boil the ocean.  All the previous catastrophic COVID cock ups weren't cock ups at all. They either didn't want to make it happen or they deliberately sabotaged things. I suspect they're planning to use COVID to push the NHS to breaking point, and then they'll privatise it, giving their friends a slice of the potentially lucrative UK health pie.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on January 23, 2021, 06:36:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 06:27:27 AM
I suspect they're planning to use COVID to push the NHS to breaking point, and then they'll privatise it, giving their friends a slice of the potentially lucrative UK health pie.

Get more American food in then there'll be even more customers. ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 23, 2021, 08:32:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 06:27:27 AM
I suspect they're planning to use COVID to push the NHS to breaking point, and then they'll privatise it, giving their friends a slice of the potentially lucrative UK health pie.

Underfunding is definitely a serious problem, but from Dutch experience I can confirm that privatisation is definitely NOT the solution....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 23, 2021, 08:45:51 AM
Quote from: Que on January 23, 2021, 08:32:47 AM
Underfunding is definitely a serious problem, but from Dutch experience I can confirm that privatisation is definitely NOT the solution....

Q

What is the solution, in your opinion? (I have none of my own, the problem is far and away beyond my competence).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 09:17:34 AM
Quote from: Que on January 23, 2021, 08:32:47 AM
privatisation is definitely NOT the solution....



That depends what you see the problem as being. Put it like this, privatisation is a solution if you're a Tory.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 23, 2021, 11:45:42 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 06:27:27 AM
I suspect they're planning to use COVID to push the NHS to breaking point, and then they'll privatise it, giving their friends a slice of the potentially lucrative UK health pie.


'We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.'

Aesop


I have no idea what the answer to the problem of future funding of the NHS is, it will certainly only grow as the population ages, but I agree privatisation is not the route to go.

Perhaps stripping away some of the wasteful (non-medical) layers of middle management, less dependence on locums (far more expensive than using in-house staff), innovation in technology that enables e.g earlier detections of illnesses, and greater possibility of people being properly treated at home virtually, could be part of the mix.
And outside of the pandemic, hospitals were sometimes doubling up as social care agencies for elderly/vulnerable people, and beds remained taken up by people who could be at home, and would probably prefer to be, if there was a system to look after them.

Crucially I think it needs also the wind of political will and cohesion to fill its sails, and this seems in very short supply. : (
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on January 23, 2021, 12:12:50 PM
Quote from: Que on January 23, 2021, 02:28:58 AM
The vaccination here, in the Netherlands, has barely started...

A combination of ordering late, organizing late, continious shifts in priority and mismanagement due to several "reforms" of the healthcare system by the neoliberal governments of the past decade...

Since I'm under 60 and perfectly healthy, I'm lucky if I would get my shot late this summer.
Though the timelines on when Western countries will have this under control are continously shifting backwards anyway...

Q

Last time I checked 82.000 Finns had been vaccinated. We could go faster if the vaccine manufacturers were able to deliver what they originally promised. I just turned 50, so I won't be expecting anything before summer, but my father, 82, could perhaps get it during the latter half of February with some luck.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 23, 2021, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on January 23, 2021, 12:12:50 PM
Last time I checked 82.000 Finns had been vaccinated. We could go faster if the vaccine manufacturers were able to deliver what they originally promised. I just turned 50, so I won't be expecting anything before summer, but my father, 82, could perhaps get it during the latter half of February with some luck.
I suspect that all governments are struggling to figure out how to get the vaccines out and the best way.  In the USA, the powers-that-be have reminded news media that there are a number of issues/problems to deal with; I imagine that the supply chain is part of it, how to convince people that it's safe and that it's important to get the vaccines, how and where to distribute the doses, how to make sure that we can get and have enough medical supplies in order to distribute it (medical equipment)...there's a lot of logistics and I think planning involved....including making sure that people can (if needed) and do get a second round of a vaccine.  And how do you get it to people in more rural areas?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 01:33:34 PM
Quote from: Iota on January 23, 2021, 11:45:42 AM

'We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.'

Aesop




Hope you saw this

Tory donor Lord Ashcroft's outsourcing firm lands £350m vaccination contract

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/revealed-tory-donor-lord-ashcrofts-outsourcing-firm-given-350m-vaccination-contract/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 23, 2021, 01:53:24 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 23, 2021, 12:29:09 PM
I suspect that all governments are struggling to figure out how to get the vaccines out and the best way.  In the USA, the powers-that-be have reminded news media that there are a number of issues/problems to deal with; I imagine that the supply chain is part of it, how to convince people that it's safe and that it's important to get the vaccines, how and where to distribute the doses, how to make sure that we can get and have enough medical supplies in order to distribute it (medical equipment)...there's a lot of logistics and I think planning involved....including making sure that people can (if needed) and do get a second round of a vaccine.  And how do you get it to people in more rural areas?

Australia's plans seem a little vague. For example

State and territory governments will each be responsible for developing their COVID-19 vaccination implementation plans, in line with the national COVID-19 Vaccination Policy and Australian Government expectations.

With the current issues with different expectations from the states as to whether state borders stay open or are shut I would have preferred to see this as a federal exercise.

As for where you go to get your jab this is what the federal govt is saying

Locations may, over time, include:
•   General practice clinics.
•   GP Respiratory Clinics (established for COVID-19 assessment and testing).
•   Dedicated vaccination clinics,established by State and Territory health services (including local councils).
•   Workplace vaccinations.


The concerns here are the first dotpoint - asking our already hard working medical practitioners to take on an extra load. Also the third point which will rely on the various state govts to do the roll out. While I like the idea of dedicated vaccination points, how these will be handled will vary considerably because it is state and territory based. One only has to look at how Victoria dropped the ball last year resulting in over 800 unnecessary deaths in nursing homes to worry that the process will be cocked up.

We start next month. My age and occupation put me well up the priority list. What I am wondering is how I will be notified that it's time for my jab. I'll find out I guess.

One final point. I'm hearing from a growing number of acquaintances that they don't trust the vaccine and therefore won't have it. Apart from basing their decision on little to no evidence I'm assuming that they never intend to travel anywhere by plane ever again as they won't have the vaccination certificate that will allow them to buy an airline ticket.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 23, 2021, 07:27:40 PM
https://sports.yahoo.com/michigan-suspends-all-athletics-test-positive-superspreader-covid-strain-034727735.html

The University of Michigan is suspending all athletic activities "until further notice and up to 14 days" after several individuals linked to the athletic department tested positive for the COVID-19 B.1.1.7 variant, the school announced Saturday.

The number of confirmed cases is currently five, with 15 more presumed positives according to The Michigan Daily. The new strain was reportedly introduced at the beginning of the semester (Jan. 19) by a Michigan athlete from the United Kingdom, per the Daily.

All members of the athletic department will immediately quarantine up to Feb. 7, but no determination has been made about games scheduled beyond that date. Among the affected programs is the men's basketball team, which is currently ranked seventh in the country in the AP poll.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 24, 2021, 12:47:16 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 23, 2021, 08:45:51 AM
What is the solution, in your opinion? (I have none of my own, the problem is far and away beyond my competence).

If I knew the perfect solution for that, they would give me the Nobel price. :D

Risks with a state run system are bureaucracy and inefficiency and suboptimal quality.

Privitisation also leads to inefficiency, but of a different kind: resources are no longer pooled.
Privitisation leads to companies trying to optimise their profits, and not the quality of the care. Another problem is risk selection: insurers will try to attract healthier clients, hospitals will focus on the most profitable treatements.

A universal healthcare system with some market elements mixed in, will probably be the best solution.
But I haven't seen the right mix yet. In the Netherlands the privitisation of hospitals and of home care hasn't proven to be such an amazing idea. The full privitisation of health care insurance, with mandatory minimum package, universal acceptance and risk compensation between insurers, worked a bit better. Private insurers push hospitals for better quality, but are also trying to fob people off with cheaper medications....

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 24, 2021, 05:21:35 AM
Some encouraging data coming out of Israel

https://mobile.twitter.com/wendyburn/status/1353309155520602119?s=21
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 24, 2021, 06:34:34 AM
Quote from: Que on January 24, 2021, 12:47:16 AM
A universal healthcare system with some market elements mixed in, will probably be the best solution.

Agreed but then again which is the right ratio of state to market? I have no idea whatsoever and honestly I think this is a problem which has no rational  --- as opposed to ideological --- solution. Be it as it might, I think there are two extremes which should be avoided: to exclude the state / market or to accept nothing but the state / market.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 24, 2021, 06:55:32 AM
We've had a couple of anti-restriction demonstrations here in Copenhagen, unpopular among the general public, by a mixed group of about 200-500 youngsters from the extreme right and left, and some seemingly naive people people believing in various conspiracies. About 100 of them had some tendencies to police confrontation and vandalism. The police dissolved the demonstrations when they went off the rails. Yesterday some of the participants hung up a doll of the PM, with a written sign that she needed to be 'culled', referring to the recent mink case, and they then put fire to it.
It's a type of action that is very rare, and quite unheard of, here. Some say that other participants took the doll down and extinguished the fire. But three protagonists for the doll action have now been arrested; no doubt they didn't quite consider - or know - that they face a court case, potentially with up to 16 years in prison, for threatening government officials (but likely much less). A fourth is on a want list.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 24, 2021, 08:14:13 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 24, 2021, 06:55:32 AM
We've had a couple of anti-restriction demonstrations here in Copenhagen, unpopular among the general public, by a mixed group of about 200-500 youngsters from the extreme right and left, and some seemingly naive people people believing in various conspiracies. About 100 of them had some tendencies to police confrontation and vandalism. The police dissolved the demonstrations when they went off the rails. Yesterday some of the participants hung up a doll of the PM, with a written sign that she needed to be 'culled', referring to the recent mink case, and they then put fire to it.
It's a type of action that is very rare, and quite unheard of, here. Some say that other participants took the doll down and extinguished the fire. But three protagonists for the doll action have now been arrested; no doubt they didn't quite consider - or know - that they face a court case, potentially with up to 16 years in prison, for threatening government officials (but likely much less). A fourth is on a want list.

Hard to know what to say about this sort of thing, similar things have happened elsewhere. If the vaccines prove to be disappointing I suspect we're in for some very turbulent times politically.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 24, 2021, 10:11:58 AM
Longish interview with Anthony Fauci on the Rachel Maddow show:

https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9wb2RjYXN0ZmVlZHMubmJjbmV3cy5jb20vbXNuYmMtcmFjaGVsLW1hZGRvdw/episode/Z2lkOi8vYXJ0MTktZXBpc29kZS1sb2NhdG9yL1YwL2VwZ3Nid3JscEMta2xORUtQRFpGOGRVeG5lTEJIX2hWMzRnUko5bktoUEE?hl=en-IN&ved=2ahUKEwixsdbAobXuAhVOeX0KHRm1CjQQjrkEegQIHBAF&ep=6

he makes it clear near the end of the interview that this is the first time he's been allowed to appear as her guest


Unfolding local situation with a woman who was in managed isolation for two weeks tested negative twice but has started a potential community spread after release. Luckily she was diligent about using the contact tracing app and the health experts can now quickly test everywhere she's been.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2021, 10:19:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 24, 2021, 06:34:34 AM
Agreed but then again which is the right ratio of state to market?

There is no fixed "right ratio" there are ratios which are right for the time and circumstances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 25, 2021, 12:40:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 24, 2021, 10:19:34 AM
There is no fixed "right ratio" there are ratios which are right for the time and circumstances.

Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 25, 2021, 01:08:53 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 24, 2021, 06:34:34 AM
Agreed but then again which is the right ratio of state to market? I have no idea whatsoever and honestly I think this is a problem which has no rational  --- as opposed to ideological --- solution. Be it as it might, I think there are two extremes which should be avoided: to exclude the state / market or to accept nothing but the state / market.

Yes, I agree. Here in the UK our NHS is one of the few things as a nation we can be proud of. The monetary cost does not bear thing about though and isn't sustainable in the medium or long term. Politically impossible to change to an official state/private partnership but to get around this the NHS pays the private sector. In my location all knee and hip replacements are performed in a private hospital for the NHS, indeed I had cataract surgery recently at the same hospital and treated as a fee paying private patient.     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 25, 2021, 01:28:32 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 25, 2021, 01:08:53 AM
Yes, I agree. Here in the UK our NHS is one of the few things as a nation we can be proud of. The monetary cost does not bear thing about though and isn't sustainable in the medium or long term. Politically impossible to change to an official state/private partnership but to get around this the NHS pays the private sector. In my location all knee and hip replacements are performed in a private hospital for the NHS, indeed I had cataract surgery recently at the same hospital and treated as a fee paying private patient.   
Yes, I've also had various investigations at a private hospital as an NHS client and am grateful for it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 25, 2021, 05:23:02 AM
Moderna now says that their vaccine is expected to work against the new UK and South-Africa mutations

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN29U1HC
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 25, 2021, 12:41:22 PM
Quote from: Irons on January 25, 2021, 01:08:53 AM
Yes, I agree. Here in the UK our NHS is one of the few things as a nation we can be proud of. The monetary cost does not bear thing about though and isn't sustainable in the medium or long term. Politically impossible to change to an official state/private partnership but to get around this the NHS pays the private sector. In my location all knee and hip replacements are performed in a private hospital for the NHS, indeed I had cataract surgery recently at the same hospital and treated as a fee paying private patient.   

I suppose more and more of it will be put into the private sector, part of the chumocracy, and more and more of it will need to be paid for at the point of need. Maybe we're close to the time when, if you've got bad hip arthritis, you can get some Tramadol for free, but if you want a nice new hip you have to sell the family jewels to pay for part of the job. I'm sure this could be sold to the electorate - it is elective surgery after all. And we've got to pay for COVID.

And there are whole sections of it which could be sold off on the quiet and no one would care because they're so unfashionable -  pharmacology, for example, and mental health and geriatrics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on January 25, 2021, 01:58:04 PM
Lockdown riots in the Netherlands? What is happening there?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2021, 03:20:01 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 25, 2021, 12:41:22 PM
I suppose more and more of it will be put into the private sector, part of the chumocracy, and more and more of it will need to be paid for at the point of need. Maybe we're close to the time when, if you've got bad hip arthritis, you can get some Tramadol for free, but if you want a nice new hip you have to sell the family jewels to pay for part of the job. I'm sure this could be sold to the electorate - it is elective surgery after all. And we've got to pay for COVID.

And there are whole sections of it which could be sold off on the quiet and no one would care because they're so unfashionable -  pharmacology, for example, and mental health and geriatrics.
Wondering about the riots in the Netherlands like JBS?

Quote from: JBS on January 25, 2021, 01:58:04 PM
Lockdown riots in the Netherlands? What is happening there?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55799919
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 25, 2021, 07:44:09 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2021, 03:20:01 PM
Wondering about the riots in the Netherlands like JBS?

I'll let que comment first.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 25, 2021, 09:29:04 PM
Quote from: Que on January 24, 2021, 12:47:16 AM
If I knew the perfect solution for that, they would give me the Nobel price. :D

Risks with a state run system are bureaucracy and inefficiency and suboptimal quality.

Privitisation also leads to inefficiency, but of a different kind: resources are no longer pooled.
Privitisation leads to companies trying to optimise their profits, and not the quality of the care. Another problem is risk selection: insurers will try to attract healthier clients, hospitals will focus on the most profitable treatements.

A universal healthcare system with some market elements mixed in, will probably be the best solution.
But I haven't seen the right mix yet. In the Netherlands the privitisation of hospitals and of home care hasn't proven to be such an amazing idea. The full privitisation of health care insurance, with mandatory minimum package, universal acceptance and risk compensation between insurers, worked a bit better. Private insurers push hospitals for better quality, but are also trying to fob people off with cheaper medications....

Q


Another factor to be considered would be a moral hazard. Theoretically (and often evidently), people are less likely to take care of their health if a (govtl) insurance pay a large portion of the medical cost.  In the U.S.A., so many people eat ridiculous amount food, and/or ridiculous kind of food, and they don't exercise. Many people have diabetes, heart problem, etc.  A generous healthcare system with low copayment etc. may not improve the discipline/condition in population. Some countries maintain govtl healthcare with low copayment because the people strive to maintain good health anyway.
However, good things about govtl healthcare include economy of scale, generosity, response to market inefficiencies, etc.  On the other hand, a good thing about privatization would be a market competition if the market is efficient.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 25, 2021, 10:07:35 PM
Quote from: JBS on January 25, 2021, 01:58:04 PM
Lockdown riots in the Netherlands? What is happening there?

1) I don't know 100% about the Netherlands, but as said those rallies in Copenhagen were very small, and foreign press has certainly been exaggerating them, also because of some intriguing pictures. They are not in any way representative of the opinions of the general population.

2) in our local mink farmer case, compensations have now been settled, and it will be a major expense - DKK 19 billion, or around 2.5 billion Euros. Apparently each farmer (there are about 1200 of them) will get around 12 million DKK or 1.7 million Euros, and lost future income for about 10 years has been thought of too ...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 25, 2021, 11:52:09 PM
Quote from: JBS on January 25, 2021, 01:58:04 PM
Lockdown riots in the Netherlands? What is happening there?

These riots took everybody by surprise, and appear only partly linked to discontent over the government's COVID measures.
Thry are still trying to figure out who these people are and what their motives are.

My first impressions:

Firstly, it seems that a significant part of the population has not been immune to internet conspiracy theories and nonsense about the virus. I found a pamphlet in my letterbox last night about toxic vaccines, Maya predictions of this pandemic and Rudolf Steiner - the loonies are out in full force and trying to take over the asylum....  ::)
Add to that a strong anti-authoritarian tradition, which has been triggered by the severe restrictions on public life. This is the group that has been, mostly peacefully , demonstrating. Though ignoring instructions on the demonstrations.

These demonstrations have been hijacked by the real rioters: young men driven by anti-governement sentiments and frustrations about their poor chances in society. They have few opportunities because of their low/lack of education and/or because of systematic discrimination against etnic minorities in the labour market. An entire generation of poorly educated disenfranchised young people - both white/Dutch & from ethnic minorities - is stuck in present day, modern hightech and white-dominated society.
The educated and more articulate young from etnic minorities have peacefully demonstrated in BLM demonstrations this summer, but the less fortunate are now throwing stones and smashing windows.

The rioters are augmented and reinforced by the third group: the lookers on, that are bored and fed up with the lockdown and are looking for sensation. With the continuation of the riots, most of the first and third group will drop out.

I see a lot of similarities with the situation in other Western countries, not least of all the US.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on January 26, 2021, 12:44:52 AM
Quote from: Que on January 25, 2021, 11:52:09 PM
These riots took everybody by surprise, and appear only partly linked to discontent over the government's COVID measures.
Thry are still trying to figure out who these people are and what their motives are.

My first impressions:

Firstly, it seems that a significant part of the population has not been immune to internet conspiracy theories and nonsense about the virus. I found a pamphlet in my letterbox last night about toxid vaccines, Maya predictions of this pandemic and Rudolf Steiner - the loonies are out in full force and trying to take over the asylum....  ::)
Add to that a strong anti-authoritarian tradition, which has been triggered by the severe restrictions on public life. This is the group that has been, mostly peacefully , demonstrating. Though ignoring instructions on the demonstrations.

These demonstrations have been hijacked by the real rioters: young men driven by anti-governemnt sentiments and frustrations about their poor chances in society. They have few opportunities because of their low/lack of education and/or because of systematic discrimination against etnic minorities in the labour market. An entire generation of poorly educated disenfranchised young people - both white/Dutch & from ethnic minorities - is stuck in present day, modern hightech and white-dominated society.
The educated and more articulate young from etnic minorities have peacefully demonstrated in BLM demonstrations this summer, but the less fortunate are now throwing stones and smashing windows.

The rioters are augmented and reinforced by the third group: the lookers on, that are bored and fed up with the lockdown and are looking for sensation. With the continuation of the riots, most of the first and third group will drop out.

I see a lot of similarities with the situation in other Western countries, not least of all the US.

Q

So do I. The White House siege has set a very dangerous precedent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 26, 2021, 02:11:06 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 26, 2021, 12:44:52 AM
So do I. The White House siege has set a very dangerous precedent.
+1 (sadly)

My wife is getting her first jab today even though she is seven years younger than me, although that is because, as a BSL Interpreter, she often works in hospitals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2021, 03:05:44 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 26, 2021, 12:44:52 AM
So do I. The White House siege has set a very dangerous precedent.

Les gilets jaunes avant tout de ca

https://www.youtube.com/v/Kszvq_618HE&ab_channel=BFMTV
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 26, 2021, 04:34:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 26, 2021, 03:05:44 AM
Les gilets jaunes avant tout de ca

https://www.youtube.com/v/Kszvq_618HE&ab_channel=BFMTV

Yep. And there are of course legitimate concerns over a growing social and economic divide and an entire group of the population becoming economically "redundant".

The pandemic is triggering social tensions that were already there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2021, 04:39:31 AM
Quote from: Que on January 26, 2021, 04:34:36 AM
Yep. And there are of course legitimate concerns over a growing social and economic divide and an entire group of the population becoming economically "redundant".

The pandemic is triggering social tensions that were already there.

I wonder whether the young will end up paying for this pandemic through income tax and decreased job security and decreased welfare entitlements, or whether the burden will be shouldered by the property owning pensioned boomers.

And if the former, what the consequences will be.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2021, 04:48:54 AM
I wonder if Europe will start to restrict exports of vaccine to none EU countries. Or indeed whether the USA will restrict vaccine exports too.

This is the sort of thing that wars are made of.


(Good job AZ is made in Wales!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 26, 2021, 06:14:32 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-26/u-s-lags-in-dna-surveillance-of-worrisome-covid-19-variants

The U.S. faces a steep uphill struggle in gearing up to monitor Covid-19 variants, a key part of watching for the emergence of dangerous mutations that might spread quickly, evade vaccines or kill more infected people.

Other countries, such as the U.K., have established robust, nationwide DNA surveillance programs to identify new covid genomes and track the spread of existing ones. But the U.S. has not: It ranks 32nd in the world for the number of sequences completed per 1,000 Covid cases, according to data from GISAID, a global database where researchers share new genomes.

While the Biden administration is promising to boost the country's sequencing efforts, it won't be easy. The U.S. system now in place includes a scattered constellation of academic, commercial and public health labs that typically are both underfunded and under-resourced. This amounts to a gaping hole in national security at a time when at least three dangerous global variants have already been identified and others are yet to be unearthed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 26, 2021, 06:28:45 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 26, 2021, 12:44:52 AM
So do I. The White House siege has set a very dangerous precedent.

Quote from: vandermolen on January 26, 2021, 02:11:06 AM
+1 (sadly)

My wife is getting her first jab today even though she is seven years younger than me, although that is because, as a BSL Interpreter, she often works in hospitals.

But you didn't/don't have a leader saying for months that the election was stolen from them, that there was a ton of fraudulent voting, etc., etc., and then inciting his fans (and fellow Americans) to go marching on the Capitol.

Hope that all goes smoothly and that your wife doesn't have a bad reaction to the vaccine.  Fingers crossed for you.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 26, 2021, 07:12:09 AM
Quote from: Irons on January 26, 2021, 12:44:52 AM
So do I. The White House siege has set a very dangerous precedent.

And we in the US still face the enormous problem that, as of 3 Nov, at least, 70 million Americans still didn't see anything objectionable to having a man-baby POTUS.  And still, far too many Reoublicans are in deniable of the gravity of 6 Jan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 26, 2021, 07:23:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 26, 2021, 07:12:09 AM
And we in the US still face the enormous problem that, as of 3 Nov, at least, 70 million Americans still didn't see anything objectionable to having a man-baby POTUS.  And still, far too many Republicans are in denial of the gravity of 6 Jan.
Sadly both too true.  I wonder how many of the people who voted for him have since changed how they view him and the election and what their thoughts are about the storming of the Capitol?

What sickens me:  some of the Republicans in Congress who changed their views about him and the election have flipped back over for him!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 26, 2021, 10:08:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2021, 01:33:34 PM
Hope you saw this

Tory donor Lord Ashcroft's outsourcing firm lands £350m vaccination contract

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/revealed-tory-donor-lord-ashcrofts-outsourcing-firm-given-350m-vaccination-contract/

Thanks. A depressingly familiar tale, and particularly concerning in light of Care Quality Commission's report on their earlier 'inadequate' handling of a homecare service.

The following also hardly inspires confidence. Why would sections be redacted, when it's clearly not in the public interest, and not a matter of national security.

".. The public version of the contract between government and Medacs has been heavily redacted and does not include key sections – including the 'contract charges' and details of the services being provided .."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2021, 11:21:02 AM
Quote from: Iota on January 26, 2021, 10:08:13 AM
Thanks. A depressingly familiar tale, and particularly concerning in light of Care Quality Commission's report on their earlier 'inadequate' handling of a homecare service.

The following also hardly inspires confidence. Why would sections be redacted, when it's clearly not in the public interest, and not a matter of national security.

".. The public version of the contract between government and Medacs has been heavily redacted and does not include key sections – including the 'contract charges' and details of the services being provided .."

They're tough feeding.

(https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/pig-feeding-trough-14116117.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 26, 2021, 01:17:04 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 26, 2021, 06:28:45 AM
But you didn't/don't have a leader saying for months that the election was stolen from them, that there was a ton of fraudulent voting, etc., etc., and then inciting his fans (and fellow Americans) to go marching on the Capitol.

Hope that all goes smoothly and that your wife doesn't have a bad reaction to the vaccine.  Fingers crossed for you.

PD

Seemed to go fine thanks PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 27, 2021, 01:37:45 PM
China starts using anal swabs to test 'high-risk' people for Covid
Method can increase detection rate among infected people, senior Beijing doctor tells state TV (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/27/china-starts-using-anal-swabs-test-covid-high-infection-areas)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 27, 2021, 03:45:23 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 27, 2021, 01:37:45 PM
China starts using anal swabs to test 'high-risk' people for Covid
Method can increase detection rate among infected people, senior Beijing doctor tells state TV (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/27/china-starts-using-anal-swabs-test-covid-high-infection-areas)

I don't think we'll see drive thru clinics for that kind of testing... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 27, 2021, 05:31:37 PM
Quote from: André on January 27, 2021, 03:45:23 PM
I don't think we'll see drive thru clinics for that kind of testing... ::)

Bottoms up!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 27, 2021, 10:27:24 PM
Do you think it's morally acceptable that Israel should vaccinate teenagers before vulnerable people have been vaccinated in Palestine?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 29, 2021, 06:00:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 27, 2021, 10:27:24 PM
Do you think it's morally acceptable that Israel should vaccinate teenagers before vulnerable people have been vaccinated in Palestine?

Of course not, if the vaccine is the same. But different vaccines may have different properties, which make them suited to different kinds of populations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 29, 2021, 08:03:49 AM
I've read that the official Israeli explanation for not engaging in any Palestinian vaccinations is that they're not responsible for anything in those areas.

Organizations like HRW tend to say otherwise:
"Israel's duties under the Fourth Geneva Convention to ensure medical supplies, including to combat the spread of pandemics, are heightened after more than 50 years of occupation with no end in sight (...) The Palestinian authorities' own obligations to protect the right to health of Palestinians in areas where they manage affairs do not absolve Israel of its responsibilities (...) The United Nations body responsible for monitoring this treaty has confirmed that Israel is obliged to respect this treaty in the occupied territory, and to protect the right to health and other rights of the population there.." (etc.)

https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/01/17/israel-provide-vaccines-occupied-palestinians#

Here in DK, lock-down has been prolonged until the end of February. So around 10 weeks in a row. Infections are still going down slowly, but the continued measures are due to fear of the advance of the new mutations.
And our government is about to present a further assistance packet to the local business life, comprising DKK 170 billion, a gigantic amount, about 23 billion Euros, or 3,500 Euros per Dane ... they'll mainly be opportunities for companies to get temporary loans without any fees, as I understand it, so far, though.
Employment rates are rising however, for the 7th month in a row, which is good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 01, 2021, 08:20:45 AM
I was vaccinated yesterday. Received a text Saturday afternoon offering four appointments for the following day of which I chose the earliest at 8.3O am, I understand they are operating 8am to 8pm seven days a week. The hub was at Epsom Racecourse which is about a twenty minute drive. Chanced my arm ;) and although she wasn't called took the wife along with the hope ..... with some puffing of cheeks they did eventually agree to give her the jab too.
The whole operation is impressive without stress and we were in and out within the hour - asked to stay on for 15 minutes to check for any reaction. On arrival drove straight into the parking area but when we left traffic was building.
We had the Pfizer vaccine, the nurse said this is the most effective and would give 90% protection within three weeks. We were advised a text would be sent between 8 and 12 weeks for the appointment of a second jab. Hopefully we can see our grandchildren soon.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 01, 2021, 08:26:00 AM
Big congrats from here, that's encouraging to hear about!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 01, 2021, 08:54:04 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 01, 2021, 08:20:45 AM
I was vaccinated yesterday. Received a text Saturday afternoon offering four appointments for the following day of which I chose the earliest at 8.3O am, I understand they are operating 8am to 8pm seven days a week. The hub was at Epsom Racecourse which is about a twenty minute drive. Chanced my arm ;) and although she wasn't called took the wife along with the hope ..... with some puffing of cheeks they did eventually agree to give her the jab too.
The whole operation is impressive without stress and we were in and out within the hour - asked to stay on for 15 minutes to check for any reaction. On arrival drove straight into the parking area but when we left traffic was building.
We had the Pfizer vaccine, the nurse said this is the most effective and would give 90% protection within three weeks. We were advised a text would be sent between 8 and 12 weeks for the appointment of a second jab. Hopefully we can see our grandchildren soon.   
Hurrah!  So happy for both of you!

I know that you want to see your grandchildren soon; however, wouldn't it be best to wait until your son and his wife have also been vaccinated?  Or have they been already?

They just started vaccinating the over 75s in my area.  One of my neighbors sent me a photo of her partner getting his first jab this past weekend.  Not certain when my age group will start being vaccinated.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 01, 2021, 09:07:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 01, 2021, 08:54:04 AM
Hurrah!  So happy for both of you!

I know that you want to see your grandchildren soon; however, wouldn't it be best to wait until your son and his wife have also been vaccinated?  Or have they been already?

They just started vaccinating the over 75s in my area.  One of my neighbors sent me a photo of her partner getting his first jab this past weekend.  Not certain when my age group will start being vaccinated.

PD

Good to hear of successful vaccinations!
My (US) county is only vaccinating 75+ y. o. right now. It's been a fiasco, undersupply and confused bookings. I'm 63 and not expecting anything soon. Maybe in March?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 01, 2021, 10:23:32 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 01, 2021, 08:20:45 AM
I was vaccinated yesterday. Received a text Saturday afternoon offering four appointments for the following day of which I chose the earliest at 8.3O am, I understand they are operating 8am to 8pm seven days a week. The hub was at Epsom Racecourse which is about a twenty minute drive. Chanced my arm ;) and although she wasn't called took the wife along with the hope ..... with some puffing of cheeks they did eventually agree to give her the jab too.
The whole operation is impressive without stress and we were in and out within the hour - asked to stay on for 15 minutes to check for any reaction. On arrival drove straight into the parking area but when we left traffic was building.
We had the Pfizer vaccine, the nurse said this is the most effective and would give 90% protection within three weeks. We were advised a text would be sent between 8 and 12 weeks for the appointment of a second jab. Hopefully we can see our grandchildren soon.   
Excellent news Lol! My wife, as an interpreter who goes into hospitals, had her jab a couple of days ago (Oxford/Astra Zeneca). She felt lousy for a couple of days after but is fine now. As a 65 year old teacher I'm curious to know when I may expect to be vaccinated but I'm not expecting anything anytime soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 01, 2021, 12:30:07 PM
Quote from: T. D. on February 01, 2021, 09:07:09 AM
Good to hear of successful vaccinations!
My (US) county is only vaccinating 75+ y. o. right now. It's been a fiasco, undersupply and confused bookings. I'm 63 and not expecting anything soon. Maybe in March?
Sorry to hear that it was "a fiasco".  :(  From what I understand (brief conversation with neighbor), things went pretty smoothly for them.  How are folks/you being notified in terms of when you can call in/make an appointment?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 01, 2021, 01:52:58 PM
Quote from: Irons on February 01, 2021, 08:20:45 AM
I was vaccinated yesterday.

That's great!  :)

The vaccinations of 85 year olds and older started in Helsinki, but my father, 82, needs to wait for his turn for some time. At this point about 145,000 Finns have been vaccinated.

A Finnish nurse named Sari Roos figured out how to squeeze seven vaccines out of one Pzfizer-Biontech vaccine bottle instead of five or six.  (https://www.en24news.com/e/2021/02/this-is-how-nurse-sari-roos-figured-out-how-to-get-seven-vaccines-from-a-pfizer-vaccine-bottle-instead-of-the-promised-five-finland.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 02, 2021, 12:33:00 AM
Thanks everyone for positive response to my post, much appreciated. Although in good health I am 73, so classified as vulnerable. Was warned of a possible reaction, headache maybe, but there was none. I understand the system is well on track for the over 70s, so Jeffrey I do not think you will have long to wait, my guess March. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 02, 2021, 12:53:06 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 02, 2021, 12:33:00 AM
Was warned of a possible reaction, headache maybe, but there was none.

That's good to hear. Yeah, those reactions are rare, but some people get them so they warn about them. Frankly even if there's headache/fever, isn't that a small price to pay for protection against corona virus?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 02, 2021, 05:20:25 AM
In my state the governor has decided that 65+ in phase 1c are more important than teachers and other frontline workers in phase 1b... so I guess it will be longer before I get the shot (I'm a teacher).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 02, 2021, 05:31:08 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 01, 2021, 12:30:07 PM
Sorry to hear that it was "a fiasco".  :(  From what I understand (brief conversation with neighbor), things went pretty smoothly for them.  How are folks/you being notified in terms of when you can call in/make an appointment?

PD

There are 2 County-run vaccination sites, which are zoos and the nearest one is over an hour's drive. You have to sign up via e-mail for an appointment. They scan for eligibility and reply, but the process apparently takes weeks. The County has been getting practically no vaccine.

I'm near the border with another County, people are asking around there in case it's faster (we have ambiguous addresses with PO in the other county), but all they've heard is vague stuff about CVS (and maybe other) drugstore chains doing it. But as far as I know the chains have no vaccine.

I've seen media reports of one drugstore giving vaccinations, it's in another town and I suspect only for residents. There's no clear information chain.

And this is in New York, less than 150 miles from the Big Apple.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 02, 2021, 05:38:10 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 02, 2021, 12:33:00 AM
Thanks everyone for positive response to my post, much appreciated. Although in good health I am 73, so classified as vulnerable. Was warned of a possible reaction, headache maybe, but there was none. I understand the system is well on track for the over 70s, so Jeffrey I do not think you will have long to wait, my guess March.
Glad you had no bad side-effects Lol. Yes, March is my guess too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on February 02, 2021, 07:04:54 AM
     The Second COVID-19 Shot Is a Rude Reawakening for Immune Cells (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/02/second-vaccine-side-effects/617892/)

T cells and B cells, the cells that make antibodies, need several days to study the spike's features before they can respond. But by the time the second injection rolls around, adaptive cells are raring to go, and far faster to react. Some of these cells have even been lingering at the site of injection, out of suspicion that their target would return. Stimulated anew, these sentinel cells will blast out their own cytokines, layering on an extra wave of inflammation. In some people, like my beleaguered neurologist husband, these complex reactions can manifest in fevers, aches, and prolonged exhaustion.

My husband had side effects after his first dose too: a headache, some fatigue, a touch of dizziness—all of which I can safely blame on his innate immune system. Those same innate responses return for another round of inflammation after the second shot. But the ruckus raised after the second injection might be a double whammy: The expected innate cells might be further egged on and amplified by a less sluggish surge of adaptive cells, concentrated near where the needle goes in.


     The article goes on to say that the absence of a reaction to either dose is not an indication of vaccine failure. It's part of the normal variation of immune systems. People who have a mild reaction to the 1st dose are likely to have a stronger reaction to the 2nd one, and people who don't react to one may not react to the second.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 02, 2021, 07:08:45 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 02, 2021, 12:33:00 AM
Thanks everyone for positive response to my post, much appreciated. Although in good health I am 73, so classified as vulnerable. Was warned of a possible reaction, headache maybe, but there was none. I understand the system is well on track for the over 70s, so Jeffrey I do not think you will have long to wait, my guess March.

Glad to hear that. I am having my vaccination on Saturday. My partner was vaccinated over a week ago and had no ill effects.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 02, 2021, 07:18:55 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 02, 2021, 05:20:25 AM
In my state the governor has decided that 65+ in phase 1c are more important than teachers and other frontline workers in phase 1b... so I guess it will be longer before I get the shot (I'm a teacher).

It is a quandary, who do you vaccinate first the vulnerable who fill up hospital beds or frontline workers. I mentioned in an earlier post that it is scandalous that so many London transport employees have died of Covid. With a plastic screen, not sure what good that would do, checkout workers at supermarkets are daily taking risks multiple times for small reward.
The decision is driven by politics. Deaths as a number can make or break a politician, or a governor, so the elderly who mostly are retired and can self-isolate are the priority, but in the long run I do not think it the correct decision.     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 02, 2021, 10:12:06 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 02, 2021, 07:08:45 AM
Glad to hear that. I am having my vaccination on Saturday. My partner was vaccinated over a week ago and had no ill effects.
Hope it goes well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 02, 2021, 01:46:13 PM
Quote from: Irons on February 02, 2021, 12:33:00 AM
Thanks everyone for positive response to my post, much appreciated. Although in good health I am 73, so classified as vulnerable. Was warned of a possible reaction, headache maybe, but there was none. I understand the system is well on track for the over 70s, so Jeffrey I do not think you will have long to wait, my guess March. 

Conquer!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 02, 2021, 04:29:36 PM
Nothing happening in Australia yet but it's meant to kick off in a couple of weeks time. Considering the last coronavirus death we had was months and months ago the wait won't be a problem. Not sure where I feature in the list - certainly not top priority but as both a teacher and also over 65 I might be getting the jab before a number of others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 03, 2021, 12:38:08 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 02, 2021, 01:46:13 PM
Conquer!

8)
Or escaped from the enemy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 03, 2021, 01:35:01 AM
Comparison of relative vaccination speed in UK, US and Finland. I didn't add Israel, because they are in their own class! About 60 % of population vaccinated!  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 03, 2021, 01:58:32 AM
- The DK government has now started work with introducing a digital Corona pass, you'll have it on your mobile phone etc.
It will contain info about your vaccination etc., and it should be ready for use in about 3-4 months.
It will of course result in debates, since people with vaccines will ultimately be getting some privileges, as opposed to those who've chosen not to get one.
At first, the pass will mainly be directed towards your travel options, but one could easily imagine more, not to say countless, other relevant sectors.

Also, they're reopening school for the youngest classes, in a modest attempt to reduce the lock-down effects a bit. But it's calculated to increase the number of daily infections again, from the current around 300-500/day from circa 100,000 tested, to maybe 2000/day. Our general lock-down is expected to last throughout February.

- reports that in France, the number of people who'd deny a vaccine are currently around 50%. Sad. If so, I'd probably stop going there for quite a while, even after getting my own, touch wood.

- the Russian vaccine seems to be getting a lot of late approval in the West too, reportedly it has a protection around 92% according to new Western studies. It's even being considered bought, by some.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-russia-vaccine/russias-sputnik-v-vaccine-91-6-effective-in-late-stage-trial-idUSKBN2A21IT?il=0

- a strange, really massive reduction of infections in India, that seems inexplicable so far - its not because of poor registration or diagnosis possibilities, local experts say, and it can't be a case of gained herd immunity
cf. for instance https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/02/01/962821038/the-mystery-of-indias-plummeting-covid-19-cases
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 03, 2021, 02:32:56 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 03, 2021, 01:58:32 AM
- reports that in France, the number of people who'd deny a vaccine are currently around 50%. Sad.

My mind is too simple to understand how people believe in random conspiracy theories rather than health professionals, but I have slowly understood (accepted) that most people in the World have very very very different thought processes from my head. Its about withstanding the difficult coexistence with aliens who don't share the fundamental facts with me. They might agree the sky is blue, but not much more...

Fortunately in Finland vaccination hesitancy is among the lowest in Europe. Finns were somewhat sceptical at first because the vaccines were developped so fast, but now that more evidence for the safety/benefits is coming in the hesitancy has dropped.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 03, 2021, 03:10:34 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 02, 2021, 10:12:06 AM
Hope it goes well.

Thanks for your good wishes. I don't know which vaccine I will get but I am hoping it will be the Oxford/AZ.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 03, 2021, 07:18:11 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 03, 2021, 01:58:32 AM
- The DK government has now started work with introducing a digital Corona pass, you'll have it on your mobile phone etc.
It will contain info about your vaccination etc., and it should be ready for use in about 3-4 months.
It will of course result in debates, since people with vaccines will ultimately be getting some privileges, as opposed to those who've chosen not to get one.
At first, the pass will mainly be directed towards your travel options, but one could easily imagine more, not to say countless, other relevant sectors.

Also, they're reopening school for the youngest classes, in a modest attempt to reduce the lock-down effects a bit. But it's calculated to increase the number of daily infections again, from the current around 300-500/day from circa 100,000 tested, to maybe 2000/day. Our general lock-down is expected to last throughout February.

- reports that in France, the number of people who'd deny a vaccine are currently around 50%. Sad. If so, I'd probably stop going there for quite a while, even after getting my own, touch wood.

- the Russian vaccine seems to be getting a lot of late approval in the West too, reportedly it has a protection around 92% according to new Western studies. It's even being considered bought, by some.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-russia-vaccine/russias-sputnik-v-vaccine-91-6-effective-in-late-stage-trial-idUSKBN2A21IT?il=0

- a strange, really massive reduction of infections in India, that seems inexplicable so far - its not because of poor registration or diagnosis possibilities, local experts say, and it can't be a case of gained herd immunity
cf. for instance https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/02/01/962821038/the-mystery-of-indias-plummeting-covid-19-cases

A digital Corona pass is a very good idea. All we got is a small cardboard card, in this age something plastic in the form of a credit card would be better.

Reports today that the Russians are claiming that one each of their Sputnik and the Oxford jab could offer the best protection against Covid mutations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 03, 2021, 09:54:39 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 03, 2021, 07:18:11 AM
A digital Corona pass is a very good idea. All we got is a small cardboard card, in this age something plastic in the form of a credit card would be better.

Reports today that the Russians are claiming that one each of their Sputnik and the Oxford jab could offer the best protection against Covid mutations.
What happens if you lose it too?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on February 03, 2021, 11:35:52 AM
On a positive note, museums will reopen next week here. I have an annual subscription to the Fine Arts Museum that I haven't been able to use for over 6 months. It's been extended during the lockdown period. I look forward to my next visits. Can't wait !  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 03, 2021, 11:38:45 AM
Quote from: André on February 03, 2021, 11:35:52 AM
On a positive note, museums will reopen next week here. I have an annual subscription to the Fine Arts Museum that I haven't been able to use for over 6 months. It's been extended during the lockdown period. I look forward to my next visits, with two expos scheduled: Riopelle and Turner. Can't wait !  :P
Yeah!  :)  I suspect that they will be limiting the number of people into the museum at one time and have some sort of spacing marks on the floors?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 03, 2021, 11:42:14 AM
Quote from: André on February 03, 2021, 11:35:52 AM
On a positive note, museums will reopen next week here. I have an annual subscription to the Fine Arts Museum that I haven't been able to use for over 6 months. It's been extended during the lockdown period. I look forward to my next visits. Can't wait !  :P

We're really wishing for that here, congrats to you for that. Museums, smaller specialized shops and galleries, maybe even cafes with outdoor serving, or small evening courses and concerts, B&Bs ... oh, the luxury of it. But it'll take a month, it seems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Benji on February 03, 2021, 04:00:47 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 03, 2021, 11:38:45 AM
Yeah!  :)  I suspect that they will be limiting the number of people into the museum at one time and have some sort of spacing marks on the floors?

PD

That, along with a one way system, was how they managed at Tate modern here in London between lockdowns. I must say it didn't feel right and it made me a bit sad to be shepherded around - I like to meander and make connections and take my time. Its hard to pause and really take anything in when someone is two metres behind you giving you the evil eye. 🤷‍♂️
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 04, 2021, 05:32:16 AM
Quote from: Benji on February 03, 2021, 04:00:47 PM
That, along with a one way system, was how they managed at Tate modern here in London between lockdowns. I must say it didn't feel right and it made me a bit sad to be shepherded around - I like to meander and make connections and take my time. Its hard to pause and really take anything in when someone is two metres behind you giving you the evil eye. 🤷‍♂️
I understand.  I like to meander around too--and spend time with works that strike me in a special way too or with famous works of art trying to understand them better and what makes them so special.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on February 04, 2021, 05:49:35 AM
I'll be going to services on Monday for a work colleague who passed away from COVID. He was the technician who took care of my computer and we chatted often. The last time we spoke was in a supermarket parking lot shortly after the virus closed the schools and work-from-home started, nearly a year ago. I never could have imagined that would be the last time I'd ever see him. He wasn't much older than me and looking forward to retirement with his family.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 04, 2021, 06:17:45 AM
Quote from: Szykneij on February 04, 2021, 05:49:35 AM
I'll be going to services on Monday for a work colleague who passed away from COVID. He was the technician who took care of my computer and we chatted often. The last time we spoke was in a supermarket parking lot shortly after the virus closed the schools and work-from-home started, nearly a year ago. I never could have imagined that would be the last time I'd ever see him. He wasn't much older than me and looking forward to retirement with his family.
I'm so sorry to hear that!  Do you happen to know if he was in pretty good health before he contracted Covid?

In any event, my condolences.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on February 04, 2021, 06:21:13 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 04, 2021, 06:17:45 AM
I'm so sorry to hear that!  Do you happen to know if he was in pretty good health before he contracted Covid?

In any event, my condolences.

PD

He had a surgery for one particular issue, but was in pretty good shape overall. He had a job that kept him running and he was pretty active outside of work, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 05, 2021, 06:03:38 AM
Sorry, Tony!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 06, 2021, 02:59:33 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/qw5QsA9Z5co&ab_channel=TomKearney

Disturbing (if accurate) glimpse into the state of union involvement in COVID health and safety in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 08, 2021, 12:39:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 06, 2021, 02:59:33 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/qw5QsA9Z5co&ab_channel=TomKearney

Disturbing (if accurate) glimpse into the state of union involvement in COVID health and safety in the UK.

Unions role is to protect the interests of it's members against "fat cat" employers. When "fat cat" union leaders sip from the same bowl then workers rights and welfare slip down the pecking order.

https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/trade_union_rich_list_2020_teaching_union_bosses_share_1m_pay_pot
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 08, 2021, 11:26:33 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 08, 2021, 12:39:34 AM
Unions role is to protect the interests of it's members against "fat cat" employers. When "fat cat" union leaders sip from the same bowl then workers rights and welfare slip down the pecking order.

https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/trade_union_rich_list_2020_teaching_union_bosses_share_1m_pay_pot

Sure, but UNITE wasn't included in the study, unless I missed it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 08, 2021, 01:00:38 PM
Exit AstraZeneca?  :(


Covid: South Africa halts AstraZeneca vaccine rollout over new variant (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-55975052)

Oxford Covid vaccine has 10% efficacy against South African variant, study suggests (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/08/oxford-covid-vaccine-10-effective-south-african-variant-study)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on February 08, 2021, 08:22:47 PM
My father, who is 88 and lives in the inner ring of Boston's suburbs (Belmont)  told me tonight he has an appointment tomorrow for the first vaccine dose.

He's not keen to go because of the weather forecast, but apparently if he doesn't go he would be pushed to a much later place in the queue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2021, 04:08:22 AM
Quote from: JBS on February 08, 2021, 08:22:47 PM
My father, who is 88 and lives in the inner ring of Boston's suburbs (Belmont)  told me tonight he has an appointment tomorrow for the first vaccine dose.

He's not keen to go because of the weather forecast, but apparently if he doesn't go he would be pushed to a much later place in the queue.
Hopefully his appointment is fairly early this morning?  Is someone driving him or will he be traveling there himself?

In any event, I hope that all goes well.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 09, 2021, 04:09:47 AM
I saw some encouraging news this morning.  1 in 10 Americans have received at least one dose of the vaccine.

And the daily covid rates are the lowest they've been in SC for the past two months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2021, 04:27:59 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 09, 2021, 04:09:47 AM
I saw some encouraging news this morning.  1 in 10 Americans have received at least one dose of the vaccine.

And the daily covid rates are the lowest they've been in SC for the past two months.
1 in 10?!  Wow!  I didn't think that it was that good.  May I ask where you heard that news?  Just curious.

Glad to hear that things are improving in SC too!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 09, 2021, 04:31:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2021, 04:27:59 AM
1 in 10?!  Wow!  I didn't think that it was that good.  May I ask where you heard that news?  Just curious.

Glad to hear that things are improving in SC too!

PD

CDC report Monday.
It's buried on this page (scroll way down): https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/08/covid-live-updates.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2021, 05:06:05 AM
Quote from: T. D. on February 09, 2021, 04:31:39 AM
CDC report Monday.
It's buried on this page (scroll way down): https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/08/covid-live-updates.html
Thank you!  :)  That's encouraging.

I have some friends who own a second home in Florida; they've received both doses of their vaccines.  Meanwhile, some of the state governors have lifted requirements on things like mask wearing in public (like in Iowa).   ::) Sigh....

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 09, 2021, 07:54:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 08, 2021, 11:26:33 AM
Sure, but UNITE wasn't included in the study, unless I missed it.

Perhaps Len McCluskey, the General Secretary of Unite, wasn't mentioned in the piece as he only receives a £140.300 salary. Unite funded £415.000 for him to decorate his flat. To be fair to Len he did give the money back when reported in the press. Had some great trips abroad though paid by Unite.
Yes, there are Tory fat cats who are far worse and corrupt. Take a look at the new Chinese Embassy to be built in London. They are all at it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 09, 2021, 11:14:48 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/09/covid-vaccine-jj-ceo-says-people-may-get-annual-shots-for-the-next-several-years.html

People may need to get vaccinated against Covid-19 annually, just like seasonal flu shots, over the next several years, Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky told CNBC on Tuesday.

"Unfortunately, as [the virus] spreads it can also mutate," he told CNBC's Meg Tirrell during a Healthy Returns Spotlight event. "Every time it mutates, it's almost like another click of the dial so to speak where we can see another variant, another mutation that can have an impact on its ability to fend of antibodies or to have a different kind of response not only to a therapeutic but also to a vaccine."

Public health officials and infectious disease experts have said there is a high likelihood that Covid-19 will become an endemic disease, meaning it will become present in communities at all times, though likely at lower levels than it is now. Health officials will have to continuously watch for new variants of the virus, so scientists can produce vaccines to fight them, medical experts say.

Gorsky's comment came after J&J said it applied for an emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration for its coronavirus vaccine. Unlike Pfizer's and Moderna's vaccines, which require two doses given about three to four weeks apart, J&J's only requires one dose, easing logistics for health-care providers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 10, 2021, 07:35:43 AM
My dad, 82, finally gets vaccinated next Monday. It has been a wait...  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 10, 2021, 07:50:32 AM
That's nice to hear!
My family members in their 70s still have a good deal of waiting to do, but one who's 97 had both.

Here, the UK B117 is increasing its share, but the total number of infections isn't going up yet, so far. It's expected to, however.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 10, 2021, 01:06:56 PM
This makes interesting reading.

https://www.qut.edu.au/research/article?id=173374
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 11, 2021, 02:41:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 10, 2021, 07:50:32 AM
That's nice to hear!
My family members in their 70s still have a good deal of waiting to do, but one who's 97 had both.

Here, the UK B117 is increasing its share, but the total number of infections isn't going up yet, so far. It's expected to, however.

Thanks! Sorry to hear your family members in their 70s have to wait. It's the same here in Finland. We don't have that many UK B117 cases (225 known) yet here, but the computer simulations say it could become the dominant strain in 3 months time. Hopefully at that point in time the most vulnerable people have been vaccinated at least once. As of now 187,000+ people (~3.4 % of pop.) in Finland have been vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 11, 2021, 02:46:08 AM
Quote from: Holden on February 10, 2021, 01:06:56 PM
This makes interesting reading.

https://www.qut.edu.au/research/article?id=173374

I can foresee a MASSIVE global shortage of asthma inhalers in the near future! What will happen to those with asthma?  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 11, 2021, 04:11:47 AM
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/chronic-infection-uk-coronavirus-variant

I thought that the above shows that truth is stranger than fiction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 12, 2021, 02:23:36 AM
Finnish company DEEP SENSING Algorithms (https://dsa.fi) has been developing technology to detect Covid-19 fast from breath. So, it's like an alcotester, but for corona virus.

copy-pasted from their pages:

The unit contains a set of carefully selected and configured nanosensors that record Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and other substances connected to the biomarkers to be identified in exhaled breath gas. The biomarker VOC's are born in human metabolism and their known relation – the VOC profile – with a given disease forms the basis for the analysis.

DSA BreathPass™ communicates with an Artificial Intelligence based cloud algorithm to calculate how well the measured breathprint of the individual's VOC profile matches with the known COVID-19 features. The results are available immediately.

DSA BreathPass™ and future development versions will be brought available for early detection of diseases such as lung and colon cancers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).


The company is supposed to be able to start production and deliveries all over the World in the near future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 12, 2021, 03:41:02 AM
Here's some unpleasant news in my county. Some posturing going on, but basically not good. It even appears farcical.

ULSTER COUNTY EXECUTIVE PAT RYAN OUTLINES VACCINE PRE-REGISTRATION AND PRIORITIZATION LIST 


List will allow residents to pre-register for the vaccine, prioritize residents based on health risk, and provide an estimated timeline for available vaccines


Starting Monday, Ulster County will have over 120,000 residents eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, but has only received 12,000 total doses from New York State


This week, Ulster County received 1,500 vaccines from NYS, a 20% reduction from last week 


KINGSTON, N.Y. - Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan today outlined a plan that establishes a pre-registration and prioritization list for all residents eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. With the announced expansion of the eligibility list from the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) this week to include those with comorbidities, the number of those eligible within Ulster County will expand significantly from 70,000 through Phases 1A and 1B, to 120,000 residents starting on February 15th. This means that over two-thirds of the county's residents are eligible for the vaccine, despite the very limited supply being allocated to the county by New York State.

This week, New York State allocated a total of 1,500 vaccines to Ulster County, split between Ulster County's Health Department, private pharmacies, and local health providers. This represents a reduction of over 20% from the week prior. Ulster County currently has the capacity to vaccinate up to 50,000 people a month but lacks the needed supply.

"Given the very limited supply of vaccine that we are receiving from New York State, it's critical that we prioritize those at greatest risk within our community. Implementing our pre-registration and prioritization list for the 120,000 residents now eligible for vaccination is an important step to both prioritize those most in need and to help all residents better understand when they will be able to receive a vaccine," Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan said. "I am hopeful that we will receive additional vaccine supply from the State and Federal government soon. We remain ready and able to scale up our distribution efforts immediately, administering up to 50,000 doses per month. I will continue to advocate to State and Federal representatives to ensure that we get the vaccines that we so urgently need."

The prioritization list, created by the Ulster County Department of Health based on CDC and New York State DOH guidance and in consultation with infectious control physicians and leaders in the region, outlines the following groups based on health risk:

Group Red - Residents over the age of 75 with a qualifying health condition, and 1B essential workers with an underlying condition

Estimated time for vaccination: April*

Group Orange - Residents ages 65 to 74 with an underlying health condition, and essential workers without an underlying health condition

Estimated time for vaccination: June*

Group Yellow - Adults (all ages) with a qualifying health condition, and 65 + without qualifying health condition

Estimated time for vaccination: October*

Group Green - Any other priority group as directed by the NYSDOH

Estimated time for vaccination: TBD

*Estimated times of vaccination are based on the current supply of vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 12, 2021, 03:45:35 AM
Quote from: T. D. on February 12, 2021, 03:41:02 AM
Here's some unpleasant news in my county. Some posturing going on, but basically not good. It even appears farcical.

ULSTER COUNTY EXECUTIVE PAT RYAN OUTLINES VACCINE PRE-REGISTRATION AND PRIORITIZATION LIST 


List will allow residents to pre-register for the vaccine, prioritize residents based on health risk, and provide an estimated timeline for available vaccines


Starting Monday, Ulster County will have over 120,000 residents eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, but has only received 12,000 total doses from New York State


This week, Ulster County received 1,500 vaccines from NYS, a 20% reduction from last week 


KINGSTON, N.Y. - Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan today outlined a plan that establishes a pre-registration and prioritization list for all residents eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. With the announced expansion of the eligibility list from the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) this week to include those with comorbidities, the number of those eligible within Ulster County will expand significantly from 70,000 through Phases 1A and 1B, to 120,000 residents starting on February 15th. This means that over two-thirds of the county's residents are eligible for the vaccine, despite the very limited supply being allocated to the county by New York State.

This week, New York State allocated a total of 1,500 vaccines to Ulster County, split between Ulster County's Health Department, private pharmacies, and local health providers. This represents a reduction of over 20% from the week prior. Ulster County currently has the capacity to vaccinate up to 50,000 people a month but lacks the needed supply.

"Given the very limited supply of vaccine that we are receiving from New York State, it's critical that we prioritize those at greatest risk within our community. Implementing our pre-registration and prioritization list for the 120,000 residents now eligible for vaccination is an important step to both prioritize those most in need and to help all residents better understand when they will be able to receive a vaccine," Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan said. "I am hopeful that we will receive additional vaccine supply from the State and Federal government soon. We remain ready and able to scale up our distribution efforts immediately, administering up to 50,000 doses per month. I will continue to advocate to State and Federal representatives to ensure that we get the vaccines that we so urgently need."

The prioritization list, created by the Ulster County Department of Health based on CDC and New York State DOH guidance and in consultation with infectious control physicians and leaders in the region, outlines the following groups based on health risk:

Group Red - Residents over the age of 75 with a qualifying health condition, and 1B essential workers with an underlying condition

Estimated time for vaccination: April*

Group Orange - Residents ages 65 to 74 with an underlying health condition, and essential workers without an underlying health condition

Estimated time for vaccination: June*

Group Yellow - Adults (all ages) with a qualifying health condition, and 65 + without qualifying health condition

Estimated time for vaccination: October*

Group Green - Any other priority group as directed by the NYSDOH

Estimated time for vaccination: TBD

*Estimated times of vaccination are based on the current supply of vaccines.

Ugh!  :( :'(  I hope and pray that they will be able to up the supply of the vaccines everywhere and soon!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 12, 2021, 05:13:09 AM
My state's senate just passed a resolution to move teachers to 1A.  If it passes in the house I could be vaccinated in March.  If not, it looks like April now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 12, 2021, 07:05:34 AM
- strange fact: we're in a global pandemic and fighting intensely world-wide against an enemy, whose total virus mass can be contained in ... half a can of coca-cola. It's true.

- not so appetizing perhaps, but authorities here in DK are working on a more comprehensive system of sewage sampling, to ensure a quicker discovery of local outbreaks and to fight them. Seems to be a gain in effectiveness.

- following 6 weeks of lock-down here, and infections being few in some areas, islands etc., the pressure is mounting for local normalization in certain sectors. Hospitals are also trying to get more ordinary work done.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 13, 2021, 01:04:16 AM
Very informative:

Can Covid-19 Vaccines Keep up with an Evolving Virus? (https://www.labiotech.eu/trends-news/emergex-covid-19-vaccine/)

The good news is that it should be possible to create vaccines with a longer lasting effect against mutations.

The bad news is that the ones we have now ("1st generation"), are not it...

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 13, 2021, 03:16:52 AM
- government here in DK plans introducing corona passport for tourists within just a few weeks (likely based on vaccines), that will enable ordinary travels/visits here.

- also, more initiatives for opening up, but mainly hindered by the expected mutations. Current infection levels continue to go down, today is comparable to August.

- good news, if true: a plan for up to  400,000 vaccines per day, when the supply is there, by cooperating with the private sector. That's about 7% of the population and would quicken the process for all of us. Provided of course that they're available.

- Facebook deleted a Danish group advocating for rebellious opening up of small shops etc. on this Monday, that had gained 1000s of members. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 13, 2021, 04:37:54 AM
In the UK were hitting 400K vaccines a day regularly, often more. Part of it is that the supply side has been reasonably well managed so far.

The delivery seems to depend on volunteers - I had my vaccine yesterday from a first year medical student, you were shifted around the centre by bright eyed bushy tailed studenty looking people, an old lady who seemed to be clearly past working age asked me if I had COVID symptoms before I was allowed admission to the centre etc.


It was wonderful, cheerful good will everywhere, real Dad's Army and Women's Institute and Mothers Union feel - the only thing missing was the cup of tea and slice of Victoria sponge after you'd been stabbed -  only the Brits will know what I mean but the rest can use google.


It won't last of course, and if the whole population is going to need to be vaccinated even just once a year, a better way will have to be found.

(I'm going to go out now and buy some Victoria Sponge)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 13, 2021, 10:33:23 AM
I believe the Washington Post has the COVID articles generally available

Europe is using longer, stricter lockdowns to fight coronavirus variants. They show signs of working. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/02/13/covid-variants-europe-longer-lockdowns/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 13, 2021, 12:13:30 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on February 11, 2021, 02:46:08 AM
I can foresee a MASSIVE global shortage of asthma inhalers in the near future! What will happen to those with asthma?  ???

You're probably right but those people panic buying the common ventolin inhalers (salbutamol) are wasting their time and money as it's not a corticosteroid. The one mentioned would require a prescription I'd imagine. I think the article should have pointed this out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 13, 2021, 11:30:10 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 13, 2021, 10:33:23 AM
I believe the Washington Post has the COVID articles generally available

Europe is using longer, stricter lockdowns to fight coronavirus variants. They show signs of working. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/02/13/covid-variants-europe-longer-lockdowns/)

France is the interesting exception, I think they think they've found a better way, they think that curfews and intensive community testing in places where worrying variants are found, are sufficiently powerful without lockdowns. The next three or four weeks will be the real test of this, the English variant is growing fast.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 14, 2021, 12:23:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 13, 2021, 11:30:10 PM
France is the interesting exception, I think they think they've found a better way, they think that curfews and intensive community testing in places where worrying variants are found, are sufficiently powerful without lockdowns. The next three or four weeks will be the real test of this, the English variant is growing fast.

In the Netherlands the UK variant has become dominant and the infection rate went up significantly.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2021, 12:27:11 AM
Quote from: Que on February 14, 2021, 12:23:52 AM
In the Netherlands the UK variant has become dominant and the infection rate went up significantly.

Q

It'll be OK because the vaccines work against it, though it's a shame that vaccine rollout is so slow in the EC. The elephant in the room is the Brazilian, if that takes hold in the UK we're well and truly fucked because our strategy relies on AZ. It has been found in the Moselle, which must mean it's in Germany and Luxembourg. I would be in favour of just closing the UK border with Europe for individuals, and having really tight controls on hauliers' contacts while they're over here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 14, 2021, 12:40:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 14, 2021, 12:27:11 AM
It'll be OK because the vaccines work against it, though it's a shame that vaccine rollout is so slow in the EC. The elephant in the room is the Brazilian, if that takes hold in the UK we're well and truly fucked because our strategy relies on AZ. It has been found in the Moselle, which must mean it's in Germany and Luxembourg. I would be in favour of just closing the UK border with Europe for individuals, and having really tight controls on hauliers' contacts while they're over here.

Yesterday I saw seen a news item from Brazil. Isolated areas that had reached herd immunity during the initial outbreak, are now experiencing a full blown 2nd wave. This would mean that previously naturally attained immunity doesn't protect against the new strain. Patients are also younger and more severly ill, and established treatements are less effective.

Very worrying news indeed... though some of the current vaccines might still be effective.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2021, 12:41:44 AM
Quote from: Que on February 14, 2021, 12:40:01 AM
Yesterday I saw seen a news item from Brazil. Isolated areas that had reached herd immunity during the initial outbreak, are now experiencing a full blown 2nd wave. This would mean that previously naturally attained immunity doesn't protect against the new strain. Patients are also younger and more severly ill, and established treatements are less effective.
Very worrying news indeed... though some of the current vaccines might still effective.

Q

Similar thing the other day from France with the SA variant, though a single case. A chap who had had covid last year in a mild form is now on a ventilator with the SA form - suggesting that the previous infection didn't give him any protection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 14, 2021, 01:34:01 AM
Quote from: Que on February 14, 2021, 12:40:01 AM
Yesterday I saw seen a news item from Brazil. Isolated areas that had reached herd immunity during the initial outbreak, are now experiencing a full blown 2nd wave. This would mean that previously naturally attained immunity doesn't protect against the new strain. Patients are also younger and more severly ill, and established treatements are less effective.
Very worrying news indeed... though some of the current vaccines might still be effective.
Q

Yes, the Manaus story ...

Quote from: Mandryka on February 13, 2021, 04:37:54 AM
(...)  I had my vaccine yesterday from a first year medical student, you were shifted around the centre by bright eyed bushy tailed studenty looking people, an old lady who seemed to be clearly past working age asked me if I had COVID symptoms before I was allowed admission to the centre etc.

It was wonderful, cheerful good will everywhere, real Dad's Army and Women's Institute and Mothers Union feel - the only thing missing was the cup of tea and slice of Victoria sponge after you'd been stabbed -  only the Brits will know what I mean but the rest can use google.
(...)

That's very good to hear, congratulations, it must be a relief.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 14, 2021, 03:46:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 13, 2021, 04:37:54 AM
In the UK were hitting 400K vaccines a day regularly, often more. Part of it is that the supply side has been reasonably well managed so far.

The delivery seems to depend on volunteers - I had my vaccine yesterday from a first year medical student, you were shifted around the centre by bright eyed bushy tailed studenty looking people, an old lady who seemed to be clearly past working age asked me if I had COVID symptoms before I was allowed admission to the centre etc.


It was wonderful, cheerful good will everywhere, real Dad's Army and Women's Institute and Mothers Union feel - the only thing missing was the cup of tea and slice of Victoria sponge after you'd been stabbed -  only the Brits will know what I mean but the rest can use google.


It won't last of course, and if the whole population is going to need to be vaccinated even just once a year, a better way will have to be found.

(I'm going to go out now and buy some Victoria Sponge)
Glad that you were able to get vaccinated; do you have to go back for a second round?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2021, 03:53:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 14, 2021, 03:46:32 AM
Glad that you were able to get vaccinated; do you have to go back for a second round?

PD

12 weeks time. In France they've decided only one vaccination is necessary for most people who've had covid last year, but not in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 14, 2021, 03:56:12 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 14, 2021, 03:53:26 AM
12 weeks time. In France they've decided only one vaccination is necessary for most people who've had covid last year, but not in the UK.
Interesting about the news in France.

Hope that all goes smoothly again next time for you.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 08:39:31 AM
Received my letter from the NHS this morning about the vaccination. They say that my local surgery should be calling me 'directly'. I could book a vaccine further away but the earliest appointment is the end of the month. I think I'll wait a few to see if the local surgery gets in touch.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 15, 2021, 09:02:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 08:39:31 AM
Received my letter from the NHS this morning about the vaccination. They say that my local surgery should be calling me 'directly'. I could book a vaccine further away but the earliest appointment is the end of the month. I think I'll wait a few to see if the local surgery gets in touch.
Great news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 09:34:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 15, 2021, 09:02:28 AM
Great news!
Thank you PD!  :)
Also I'm having another ONS (Office for National Statistics) Covid Test tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 10:17:22 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on February 15, 2021, 09:08:48 AM
Yes we got our letters this morning also - however the surgery already rang last week to arrange, appointments are on Wednesday.  Slightly surprised since we are in Priority Group #5 i.e. well down the list, I was expecting about Easter time. ::)
Good to hear and hope it goes well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 15, 2021, 01:17:10 PM
Quote from: ultralinear on February 15, 2021, 09:08:48 AM
Yes we got our letters this morning also - however the surgery already rang last week to arrange, appointments are on Wednesday.  Slightly surprised since we are in Priority Group #5 i.e. well down the list, I was expecting about Easter time. ::)

Easter time? You're moving a lot faster than us and we have considerably less population than you.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 01:28:59 PM
Quote from: ultralinear on February 15, 2021, 10:34:45 AM
Thanks. :)

My point - if I had a point - was that it's not just a pious hope that the surgery may call, but that if mine did then you can realistically expect yours to, because in every other respect my surgery is fairly useless.  In fact they rang twice - first last Wednesday, offering an appointment on Saturday morning in a clinic 7 miles away, which we had to decline as every road between here and there was solidly iced over and likely to remain so - and then again last Friday, offering appointments this Wednesday in the surgery itself.  So they do seem keen.  Like everything else it's all about numbers and filling quotas, I suppose.
Thanks - that's helpful to know.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 16, 2021, 12:37:59 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 15, 2021, 08:39:31 AM
Received my letter from the NHS this morning about the vaccination. They say that my local surgery should be calling me 'directly'. I could book a vaccine further away but the earliest appointment is the end of the month. I think I'll wait a few to see if the local surgery gets in touch.

Be on your toes, Jeffrey. Robert Elms (he is 60) the Radio London presenter said on his show yesterday that he received a text on Sunday which he didn't open until yesterday morning only to discover he missed his slot! I had my jab less then 24 hours, quite a bit less, after receiving a text.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 16, 2021, 03:24:37 AM
That's useful to know Lol. Thanks. I often don't check my texts for days at a time!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 16, 2021, 04:20:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 16, 2021, 03:24:37 AM
That's useful to know Lol. Thanks. I often don't check my texts for days at a time!
You would think that they would be able to give more notice?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 16, 2021, 05:00:11 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 16, 2021, 04:20:04 AM
You would think that they would be able to give more notice?

PD

It seems to vary. I was sent a text with a link to a website where I could book a slot. I booked one a week away. I turned up, everything was well-organised and the whole procedure took about ten minutes. I was given a card with my vaccination details and told they would be in touch for the second shot. No ill-effects except possibly a slight headache the day after.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on February 16, 2021, 07:57:47 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on February 15, 2021, 09:08:48 AM
Yes we got our letters this morning also - however the surgery already rang last week to arrange, appointments are on Wednesday.  Slightly surprised since we are in Priority Group #5 i.e. well down the list, I was expecting about Easter time. ::)

Here in N.London I had my jab at the weekend and I'm in Priority Group 7, so we appear to be slightly ahead of the curve. I got the AstraZeneca vaccine, which was the only one the centre had. Which one you get seems to boil down to what's available.
I received a text a week prior and was offered a choice of slots. It was all very friendly, but we had to queue outside in the cold to get in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 16, 2021, 08:08:29 AM
Quote from: Iota on February 16, 2021, 07:57:47 AM
Here in N.London I had my jab at the weekend and I'm in Priority Group 7, so we appear to be slightly ahead of the curve. I got the AstraZeneca vaccine, which was the only one the centre had. Which one you get seems to boil down to what's available.


Let's all hope it works against the dominant variant here. If not, we're fucked.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2021, 12:02:38 PM
Yes, the headline comes from the Under Secretary of the Obvious:

The coronavirus pandemic doesn't neatly adhere to the lines of political rhetoric (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/16/coronavirus-pandemic-doesnt-neatly-adhere-lines-political-rhetoric/)

Since Jan. 13, the seven-day average of new infections has declined every day. As of Monday, the country was seeing about 88,000 new cases per day on average, a figure that the country last saw Nov. 1. Since the third surge in cases began in mid-September, this is the first drop in new cases which isn't obviously a function of decreases in testing associated with holidays.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on February 16, 2021, 02:49:26 PM
The Atlantic:

The Unlikeliest Pandemic Success Story
How did a tiny, poor nation [Bhutan] manage to suffer only one death from the coronavirus? (https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2021/02/coronavirus-pandemic-bhutan/617976/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:16:58 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 16, 2021, 12:37:59 AM
Be on your toes, Jeffrey. Robert Elms (he is 60) the Radio London presenter said on his show yesterday that he received a text on Sunday which he didn't open until yesterday morning only to discover he missed his slot! I had my jab less then 24 hours, quite a bit less, after receiving a text.
I can go one better Lol. As the surgery hadn't yet contacted me I thought I'd try to book online, only to receive a message informing me that I'd missed my slot, although I'd never been given one!  >:D

I phoned the surgery and they were v helpful, telling me that I hadn't missed my appointment and booking me in for a vaccination this Friday afternoon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 17, 2021, 03:24:05 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:16:58 AM
I can go one better Lol. As the surgery hadn't yet contacted me I thought I'd try to book online, only to receive a message informing me that I'd missed my slot, although I'd never been given one!  >:D

I phoned the surgery and they were v helpful, telling me that I hadn't missed my appointment and booking me in for a vaccination this Friday afternoon.
Bizarre!  Well, I'm glad that you have an appointment!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:32:00 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 17, 2021, 03:24:05 AM
Bizarre!  Well, I'm glad that you have an appointment!
Thank you PD! Yes and possibly sooner than expected. I'll be glad to be getting some protection before returning to school, presumably on 8th March, as it does not look like the government will be prioritising vaccinating teachers in England.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 17, 2021, 06:25:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:16:58 AM
I can go one better Lol. As the surgery hadn't yet contacted me I thought I'd try to book online, only to receive a message informing me that I'd missed my slot, although I'd never been given one!  >:D

I phoned the surgery and they were v helpful, telling me that I hadn't missed my appointment and booking me in for a vaccination this Friday afternoon.


Bureaucracy ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 07:17:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 17, 2021, 06:25:21 AM
Bureaucracy ....
Indeed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 17, 2021, 08:51:01 AM
I was invited for a covid vaccine because the NHS thought I was 6cm tall

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/invited-covid-vaccine-because-nhs-19857990
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 17, 2021, 08:58:52 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:32:00 AM
Thank you PD! Yes and possibly sooner than expected. I'll be glad to be getting some protection before returning to school, presumably on 8th March, as it does not look like the government will be prioritising vaccinating teachers in England.

In fact the latest research suggests that you're less likely to catch COVID in school than out of it!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0p4dumafinh5tlp/Warwick%20Schools%20preprint.pdf?dl=0

(paragraph starting line 231)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 17, 2021, 10:12:31 AM
Current statistics still good here in DK, but new variants advancing, and there's the likely option that they can result in a considerable increase within a month or so, at home and not at least on a European level. Generally, the continued lock-down, now existing for 7 weeks, is getting more unpopular, and though comprised by the lock-down, some smaller, local areas, such as islands, haven't had infected people for weeks. Also, quite a few things seem illogical - big supermarkets with a considerable flux of customers being allowed to open, while smaller, specialized non-food shops can't open, etc. But some experts say that a lock-down even into May might actually be recommendable.

There's a new plan from the government: people working in sectors that will open up, presumably around the 1st of March, recommended to have 2 weekly quick- or PCR-tests. This might reduce infections about 50%. Possibly, other people must too, including elder pupils. But for a start at least, this would be voluntary.

So quick-tests set to become a part of your daily life. But they're talking about some test techniques that are less inconvenient, only 2-3 cm up your nostrils, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:08:20 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 17, 2021, 08:58:52 AM
In fact the latest research suggests that you're less likely to catch COVID in school than out of it!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0p4dumafinh5tlp/Warwick%20Schools%20preprint.pdf?dl=0

(paragraph starting line 231)
Interesting! Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on February 18, 2021, 10:32:36 AM

     As of today I qualify for the vaccine, as phase 2 begins in Massachusetts. I have an appointment for the first shot March 12 at my health care provider.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 18, 2021, 11:13:56 PM
Quote from: drogulus on February 18, 2021, 10:32:36 AM
     As of today I qualify for the vaccine, as phase 2 begins in Massachusetts. I have an appointment for the first shot March 12 at my health care provider.
Good to know - hope it goes well. Getting my Shot No.1 this afternoon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 18, 2021, 11:15:30 PM
Quote from: drogulus on February 18, 2021, 10:32:36 AM
     As of today I qualify for the vaccine, as phase 2 begins in Massachusetts. I have an appointment for the first shot March 12 at my health care provider.

That's good. :) In Finland people outside risk groups start getting vaccines in July they estimate now.
Almost 10 % of population could be vaccinated every week if we just got enough vaccines...  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 18, 2021, 11:16:55 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 18, 2021, 11:13:56 PM
Good to know - hope it goes well. Getting my Shot No.1 this afternoon.

Good stuff!  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 18, 2021, 11:56:47 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 17, 2021, 03:16:58 AM
I can go one better Lol. As the surgery hadn't yet contacted me I thought I'd try to book online, only to receive a message informing me that I'd missed my slot, although I'd never been given one!  >:D

I phoned the surgery and they were v helpful, telling me that I hadn't missed my appointment and booking me in for a vaccination this Friday afternoon.

Great news, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 19, 2021, 03:12:11 AM
Quote from: drogulus on February 18, 2021, 10:32:36 AM
     As of today I qualify for the vaccine, as phase 2 begins in Massachusetts. I have an appointment for the first shot March 12 at my health care provider.
Great news!  :)

Quote from: vandermolen on February 18, 2021, 11:13:56 PM
Good to know - hope it goes well. Getting my Shot No.1 this afternoon.
Hope all goes smoothly Jeffrey.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 03:32:42 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on February 18, 2021, 11:15:30 PM
That's good. :) In Finland people outside risk groups start getting vaccines in July they estimate now.
Almost 10 % of population could be vaccinated every week if we just got enough vaccines...  :P

I hope all goes well for you. There is a report on Microsoft News saying a new 'Finnish' variant has been detected. It probably originated outside Finland but was first detected there. One of your top virologists has said that, as yet, it is 'not yet a major concern'. Let us hope it stays that way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 19, 2021, 04:32:26 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 03:32:42 AM
I hope all goes well for you. There is a report on Microsoft News saying a new 'Finnish' variant has been detected. It probably originated outside Finland but was first detected there. One of your top virologists has said that, as yet, it is 'not yet a major concern'. Let us hope it stays that way.

Yes, they mentioned the variant in the news, but as of now not much is known about it. Here's the link to the English section of YLE, Finnish Broadcasting Company:

https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/new_coronavirus_variant_discovered_in_finland/11796958
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 05:06:23 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on February 19, 2021, 04:32:26 AM
Yes, they mentioned the variant in the news, but as of now not much is known about it. Here's the link to the English section of YLE, Finnish Broadcasting Company:

https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/new_coronavirus_variant_discovered_in_finland/11796958

Thanks for the link. It looks like MSN got their information from FBC, much of it is identical, word for word.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 19, 2021, 05:14:21 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 05:06:23 AM
Thanks for the link. It looks like MSN got their information from FBC, much of it is identical, word for word.

Yeah, that's what I figured. Copy paste business...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 19, 2021, 05:27:20 AM
Infections going up a little again here in Denmark, in spite of the lockdown. Though the rise is not really significant yet, it's possibly because of the aggressive UK mutation B117, now constituting about 50% of them, a development expected by experts. But we hope the level will remain relatively stable, so that we can open up a little and not just wait for vaccines/vaccine effects. The vaccines clearly do work in reducing the number of fatalities among the elderly, though. The daily fatalities have gone down a lot now.

Congratulations to those here who had the vaccine or are in the process of getting it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on February 19, 2021, 11:39:37 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 03:32:42 AM
I hope all goes well for you. There is a report on Microsoft News saying a new 'Finnish' variant has been detected. It probably originated outside Finland but was first detected there. One of your top virologists has said that, as yet, it is 'not yet a major concern'. Let us hope it stays that way.
Yes, they discovered a variant that wouldn't be detected in the tests based on recognizing the DNA of the virus, but the particular variant didn't seem noteworthy otherwise, except to show that other similarly undetectable variants are developing everywhere over time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 19, 2021, 11:46:53 PM
I had my vaccine shot no.1 yesterday afternoon (Oxford AZ vaccine). I felt a bit dopey for ten minutes afterwards, but that's arguably my normal state. Feel fine today. When I left the volunteers at the surgery door said 'See you for Round 2'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 20, 2021, 12:03:51 AM
We have have little say in the matter, but personally I would not be very keen on getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Its 60% effectiveness is is just enough to create herd immunity, but quite meagre in term of individual protection.

And then there are doubts being raised about its effectiveness against new strains  (South African/Brazilian).

The EU has this week put in additional orders for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which use mRNA technology and show the highest level of effectiveness. No additional AZ has been ordered and a few countries, like Germany, have stopped using it.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 20, 2021, 12:24:00 AM
Quote from: Que on February 20, 2021, 12:03:51 AM
We have have little say in the matter, but personally I would not be very keen on getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Its 60% effectiveness is is just enough to create herd immunity, but quite meagre in term of individual protection.

And then there are doubts being raised about its effectiveness against new strains  (South African/Brazilian).

The EU has this week put in additional orders for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which use mRNA technology and show the highest level of effectiveness. No additional AZ has been ordered and a few countries, like Germany, have stopped using it.

Q
Yes, but as you say, we have little choice (over here at least) and I'd rather have some protection than none. Meanwhile I'm carrying on with the Vitamin D and C tablets.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 12:46:25 AM
Quote from: Que on February 20, 2021, 12:03:51 AM

Its 60% effectiveness is is just enough to create herd immunity


We don't know what effect these vaccines, any of them, have on transmission.

Quote from: Que on February 20, 2021, 12:03:51 AM


but quite meagre in term of individual protection.


Just to get this in perspective, the flu virus is about 30% effective. We don't know how effective any of the vaccines are at protecting people from the severe form of the disease

Quote from: Que on February 20, 2021, 12:03:51 AM

And then there are doubts being raised about its effectiveness against new strains  (South African/Brazilian).


All the vaccines are an unknown quantity against Brazil and SA
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 20, 2021, 01:18:25 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on February 20, 2021, 12:24:00 AM
Yes, but as you say, we have little choice (over here at least) and I'd rather have some protection than none. Meanwhile I'm carrying on with the Vitamin D and C tablets.

Absolutely true. And if herd immunity is reached, there is little chance to come in contact with the virus in the first place. Which is the point of herd immunity.

Here in the Netherlands they seem to reserve the Pfizer for the elderly and other risk categories.

So chances are that I will get the AZ as well.  :-\

Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 12:46:25 AM
We don't know what effect these vaccines, any of them, have on transmission.

Yes, it is too early to tell. The research and the data isn't there to say for certain.
Decisions are therefore made on the assumption that protection against the virus on an individual level will sufficiently affect transmission.

QuoteJust to get this in perspective, the flu virus is about 30% effective. We don't know how effective any of the vaccines are at protecting people from the severe form of the disease

Not sure what you are trying to say here? I understand that effectiveness is measured in personal immunity.
The lower effectiveness of the flu vaccines is due to the risk of the occurrence of strains the annually designed vaccine does not offer protection against. Against the "right" strains included in a flu vaccine, it offers comparable succes rates as the AZ vaccine: 60-70%. Which is not surprising, since the AZ vaccine is a similar "classic" vaccine.

QuoteAll the vaccines are an unknown quantity against Brazil and SA

We don't know anything for sure yet, true. For all we know, all current  vaccines might be ineffective against these new strains. But considering the fundamental differences in methods and technology behind the different vaccines,  it seems likely that they will respond differently to new strains. But more resistent "2nd generation" vaccines have yet to be produced: see the link I posted earlier.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 02:27:06 AM
Quote from: Que on February 20, 2021, 01:18:25 AM

Yes, it is too early to tell. The research and the data isn't there to say for certain.
Decisions are therefore made on the assumption that protection against the virus on an individual level will sufficiently affect transmission.


This will be a serious issue for you when you have more of the population vaccinated, because long COVID could remain a major health problem if transmission is high. Not to mention all those people who won't be sufficiently protected by the vaccine to stop them needing an ICU bed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 20, 2021, 02:31:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 02:27:06 AM
This will be a serious issue for you when you have more of the population vaccinated, because long COVID could remain a major health problem if transmission is high. Not to mention all those people who won't be sufficiently protected by the vaccine to stop them needing an ICU bed.

That is unfortunately a possible scenario. Let's hope it doesn't come true!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 02:55:12 AM
Too many assumptions and ifs with these vaccines. Honestly, the whole thing looks more and more like a large-scale vaccinological experiment rather than something thoroughly researched and relatively safe. I have no intention to get the shot(s) anytime soon.

And lest I be accused of being an anti-vaxxer, I hasten to add that over the years I got my 7yo son vaccinated with all the mandatory vaccines plus several of the recommended, non-mandatory ones.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 03:23:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 02:55:12 AM
Too many assumptions and ifs with these vaccines. Honestly, the whole thing looks more and more like a large-scale vaccinological experiment rather than something thoroughly researched and relatively safe. I have no intention to get the shot(s) anytime soon.

And lest I be accused of being an anti-vaxxer, I hasten to add that over the years I got my 7yo son vaccinated with all the mandatory vaccines plus several of the recommended, non-mandatory ones.

Try maximin - look at your options from a self interested point of view and maximise your minimum payoff. If you don't get the vaccine the probability of you getting sick with Covid is increased, and even if it's mild it's a lot worse than any side effects of the vaccine itself. If you do get it, the worst consequence for you is a painful arm and a bit of the shivers the day after. So I'd say, logically and prudentially, take it if offered, even if you're in your 20s or 30s.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 03:42:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 03:23:24 AM
Try maximin - look at your options from a self interested point of view and maximise your minimum payoff. If you don't get the vaccine the probability of you getting sick with Covid is increased, and even if it's mild it's a lot worse than any side effects of the vaccine itself. If you do get it, the worst consequence for you is a painful arm and a bit of the shivers the day after. So I'd say, logically and prudentially, take it if offered, even if you're in your 20s or 30s.

I'm 48, actually. I couldn't get the shot right now anyway because I don't fall into any category which is scheduled for this spring. But I can't say I can hardly wait my turn either. I'll just wait and see.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 04:14:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 03:42:51 AM
I'm 48, actually. I couldn't get the shot right now anyway because I don't fall into any category which is scheduled for this spring. But I can't say I can hardly wait my turn either. I'll just wait and see.

I felt a bit like you I have to say, though in the end I took it, with the maximin reasoning above my motivator.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 20, 2021, 07:58:47 AM
There seems to be this pervasive misinformed opinion that the vaccines were rushed.  They were not rushed.  It is possible to run the different phases of the clinical trials simultaneously since they are independent of each other.  It made testing faster but no less rigorous than moving through in a sequential fashion.

And at this point so MANY people have been vaccinated with such a very, very small percentage suffering from unintended significant side effects that fear of these vaccines just doesn't seem rational.

Since medical experts are claiming a very high percentage need to be vaccinated to reach herd immunity, for the good of the community everyone that can be vaccinated should be regardless of whether they think that they personally need it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 08:13:14 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 20, 2021, 07:58:47 AM


Since medical experts are claiming a very high percentage need to be vaccinated to reach herd immunity, for the good of the community everyone that can be vaccinated should be regardless of whether they think that they personally need it.

That argument will work only if they prevent transmission.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 08:26:33 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 20, 2021, 07:58:47 AM
everyone that can be vaccinated should be regardless of whether they think that they personally need it.

Iow, vaccination should be mandatory, right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2021, 08:28:55 AM
Quote from: drogulus on February 18, 2021, 10:32:36 AM
     As of today I qualify for the vaccine, as phase 2 begins in Massachusetts. I have an appointment for the first shot March 12 at my health care provider.

Quote from: vandermolen on February 18, 2021, 11:13:56 PM
Good to know - hope it goes well. Getting my Shot No.1 this afternoon.

Very good, friends.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2021, 08:29:39 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 03:32:42 AM
I hope all goes well for you. There is a report on Microsoft News saying a new 'Finnish' variant has been detected. It probably originated outside Finland but was first detected there. One of your top virologists has said that, as yet, it is 'not yet a major concern'. Let us hope it stays that way.

Hear, hear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 08:36:32 AM
Quote from: Biffo on February 19, 2021, 03:32:42 AM
There is a report on Microsoft News saying a new 'Finnish' variant has been detected. It probably originated outside Finland but was first detected there.

That's actually a very sensitive topic. If a mutation was first detected in country X, then it's okay to call it the British, Brazilian, Finnish or South African mutation. But try to talk about the Chinese virus (because it's China where the first cases of SARS-Cov-2 were detected and reported, right?) ---and  no sooner than that you'll be accused of racism.  ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 08:38:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 08:26:33 AM
Iow, vaccination should be mandatory, right?

I don't think that's what he's saying.

Saying for example that everyone should eat healthy food, does not mean that one wants it to become mandatory, and the alternatives forbidden. It's a recommendation, based on sound advise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 09:27:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 08:38:15 AM
I don't think that's what he's saying.

Saying for example that everyone should eat healthy food, does not mean that one wants it to become mandatory, and the alternatives forbidden. It's a recommendation, based on sound advise.

If the vaccines prevent transmission then not being vaccinated is like smoking. By refusing the vaccine you will not only put yourself at risk, you would, in the event, put others at risk who are near you. If there's a case for banning smoking in public places on the grounds of the dangerousness of passive smoking, there would be case for forbidding people who haven't been vaccinated to enter any public place, they would have to remain in solitary house arrest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2021, 09:27:43 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 08:38:15 AM
I don't think that's what he's saying.

Saying for example that everyone should eat healthy food, does not mean that one wants it to become mandatory, and the alternatives forbidden. It's a recommendation, based on sound advise.

Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 09:36:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 09:27:07 AM
there would be case for forbidding people who haven't been vaccinated to enter any public place, they would have to remain in solitary house arrest.

Such a scenario would beat even the worst nightmares of Dostoevsky, Kafka and Huxley taken together --- and yet it is very much possible. What saddens me no end is that you and probably nine out of ten GMGers approve of it, nay, you are only too eager to welcome and applaud it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 20, 2021, 09:42:10 AM
As of now, 5 % of Finns have got their vaccination. 95 % to go (+ second round)...  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2021, 10:07:40 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 09:36:43 AM
Such a scenario would beat even the worst nightmares of Dostoevsky, Kafka and Huxley taken together --- and yet it is very much possible. What saddens me no end is that you and probably nine out of ten GMGers approve of it, nay, you are only too eager to welcome and applaud it.

Well, that was a leap.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 10:09:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 20, 2021, 10:07:40 AM
Well, that was a leap.

Should God Almighty prove me wrong, I'd leap for joy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 10:15:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 10:09:30 AM
God Almighty


He is unclean, and he shall dwell alone; his dwelling shall be outside the camp.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 10:18:07 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 09:27:07 AM
If the vaccines prevent transmission then not being vaccinated is like smoking. By refusing the vaccine you will not only put yourself at risk, you would, in the event, put others at risk who are near you. If there's a case for banning smoking in public places on the grounds of the dangerousness of passive smoking, there would be case for forbidding people who haven't been vaccinated to enter any public place, they would have to remain in solitary house arrest.

Yes, there are some dilemmas in this. The policy in European countries is that it is hoped for, that enough people will show responsibility by getting the vaccine, and that the virus will then die out, or become more tolerable. So a certain number of free-riders will be accepted, and also benefit from it in the end. But there's the dilemma that logically, getting the vaccine could or will lead to some privileges when moving about in society, cf. the plans for a vaccine pass, even on an international level. This could facilitate more people getting the vaccine, but it could also collide with the individual rights for self-determination, collide with discrimination, and ultimately human rights, according to some people. There's a resolution from the European Council, January 21st, that seems to put the individual's own right to decide first, but I haven't seen much discussion of it, and apparently, the main content of the debate there, and the political answer about it, is that it's too early to decide on the matter.

https://epthinktank.eu/2021/01/25/outcome-of-the-european-council-video-conference-of-21-january-2021/
https://www.nyatider.nu/council-of-europe-no-compulsory-vaccinations-and-no-discrimination-against-the-unvaccinated/ (this is a right-wing source, likely biased)


I think that it is likely that gradually, a larger percentage of the population will be getting the vaccine, and that it will be the majority probably everywhere. We're still very early in that process.

Future research will show the extent one might still be able to infect others, and which vaccines this may apply to; the vaccines will be improved all the time too. But I'd suppose that there's hardly the same level of infection risk for others, as you'd have without the vaccine. We'll see. However: 1) if getting a vaccine, one will not strain the health care system like people who get really sick from the disease 2) one will contribute to work with improving vaccines 3) overall, it's still most likely that one will contribute to the disease dying out 4) continued testing might be an option to survey the situation, if there's a problem in an area 5) by still applying basic considerations, there shouldn't be a problem meeting those who hadn't had a vaccine. And when meeting others that have had the vaccine, such considerations can probably be loosened somewhat.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 10:39:10 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 10:18:07 AM
Yes, there are some dilemmas in this. The policy in European countries is that it is hoped for, that enough people will show responsibility by getting the vaccine, and that the virus will then die out, or become more tolerable. So a certain number of free-riders will be accepted, and also benefit from it in the end. But there's the dilemma that logically, getting the vaccine could or will lead to some privileges when moving about in society, cf. the plans for a vaccine pass, even on an international level. This could facilitate more people getting the vaccine, but it could also collide with the individual rights for self-determination, collide with discrimination, and ultimately human rights, according to some people. There's a resolution from the European Council, January 21st, that seems to put the individual's own right to decide first, but I haven't seen much discussion of it, and apparently, the main content of the debate there, and the political answer about it, is that it's too early to decide on the matter.

I should have thought it was the default position of the Left, be it European or American, to fight each and every form of discrimination. Therefore I should have expected all left(ist) GMGers to strongly denounce and renounce any idea of people being allowed or not to move around depending on whether they were vaccinated or not --- as long as vaccination is voluntary, not mandatory.





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 11:02:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 10:39:10 AM
I should have thought it was the default position of the Left, be it European or American, to fight each and every form of discrimination. Therefore I should have expected all left(ist) GMGers to strongly denounce and renounce any idea of people being allowed or not to move around depending on whether they were vaccinated or not --- as long as vaccination is voluntary, not mandatory.

Yes, the basic discussion in this is that the very introduction of any sort of vaccine pass would be illegal, since holders of it shouldn't and couldn't be given any privileges, in any form. Only specific laws regarding mandatory vaccines in some circumstances should be allowed, though some oppose this too. But then, for one thing, a vaccine pass could also be incorporated into these laws.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:06:42 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 10:18:07 AMthe vaccines will be improved all the time too.


What does this mean?  The history of flu vaccines, well publicized and freely available, indicates otherwise.  Sometimes a vaccine is effective, sometimes it is not.  Blind faith in science is as dangerous as blind faith in religion. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 11:11:04 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 11:02:33 AM
Yes, the basic discussion in this is that the very introduction of any sort of vaccine pass would be illegal, since holders of it shouldn't and couldn't be given any privileges, in any form. Only specific laws regarding mandatory vaccines in some circumstances should be allowed, though some oppose this too. But then, for one thing, a vaccine pass could also be incorporated into these laws.

All these legal and lawful considerations are very fine --- yet I'm willing to bet that it won't be too long before they will be discarded altogether, and a digital vaccination passport will be required for doing pretty much everything, or else be confined to virtual house arrest.

Will you be okay with that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 11:12:19 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:06:42 AM
Blind faith in science is as dangerous as blind faith in religion.

Thrice amen!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:13:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 11:11:04 AMyet I'm willing to bet that it won't be too long before they will be discarded altogether, and a digital vaccination passport will be required for doing pretty much everything, or else be confined to virtual house arrest.


Israel is launching Covid immunity passports. Here's what they allow you to do (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/15/israel-is-launching-covid-immunity-passports-for-vaccinated-citizens.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 11:15:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:13:33 AM

Israel is launching Covid immunity passports. Here's what they allow you to do (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/15/israel-is-launching-covid-immunity-passports-for-vaccinated-citizens.html)

;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 11:17:19 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:06:42 AM

What does this mean?  The history of flu vaccines, well publicized and freely available, indicates otherwise.  Sometimes a vaccine is effective, sometimes it is not.  Blind faith in science is as dangerous as blind faith in religion.

This may show the different possibilities vis-a-vis vaccines

(https://i.ibb.co/6nMXDHN/covid.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 20, 2021, 11:23:50 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 20, 2021, 11:17:19 AM
This may show the different possibilities vis-a-vis vaccines

(https://i.ibb.co/6nMXDHN/covid.png)


Global herd immunity is years away - best case.  Until all countries achieve herd immunity, new mutations will arise, and protections afforded the vaccinated in wealthy countries - which are and will be real - will not allow everyone to get back to life circa 2019.  Governments at all levels need to start formulating public health responses to deal with endemic Covid.  It's going to take a long time to administer 12.8 billion doses of vaccine.  (Probably fewer as the less effective single dose vaccine will be more practical in many low income countries.) 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 11:49:32 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 11:11:04 AM
All these legal and lawful considerations are very fine --- yet I'm willing to bet that it won't be too long before they will be discarded altogether, and a digital vaccination passport will be required for doing pretty much everything, or else be confined to virtual house arrest.

Will you be okay with that?

You seem convinced about these dystopic future developments, meaning that your or my opinion don't mean anything anyway, since we'd both have to accept, whatever the differences and nuances. A milder form of a vaccine pass than what you're suggesting (house arrests certainly won't take place, at least not in my country) could become a reality. However there's the supranational level obviously influencing decisions as well. I'd probably be more for also having possible alternatives of mandatory testing, when necessary (for getting access to some places), with a vaccine pass facilitating the process. But it's difficult to know what the future circumstances will be, and what knowledge and problems we'll have.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 12:04:13 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 11:49:32 AM
You seem convinced about these dystopic future developments

I am not. As long as France and Germany are against (and they are), I am confident such tyranny will not pass.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on February 20, 2021, 01:10:12 PM

     It's common for vaccines to improve. The target, however, moves, so the improvement is in keeping the vaccines effective as the viruses evolve.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 20, 2021, 03:07:49 PM
Holy cow!  I'm gone for a few hours and we're talking about locking people in their homes like they did with the black death!

I was saying it as a suggestion not let's roll out fascist policies across the globe. 

I agree with Todd that we are a long ways way from herd immunity.  I think that is mostly because the lion's share of vaccines go to a handful of countries leaving most of the world with almost nothing.  It will take a very long time to get to all of those countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 20, 2021, 03:32:40 PM
Policies favoring national acquisition and vaccination ahead of global vaccination efforts are eminently sensible from a national perspective - and of course I will benefit when I can actually receive a vaccine sometime in Q2, Q3, or Q4 (depending on who's talking) - but that is only part of the cause of the long term delay in achieving global herd immunity.  The headline numbers - the EU doubling spending to €1 billion and the US dropping $4 billion on Covax to muster 2 billion doses - is just too small in scale.  Bolder action and more spending is needed from all high income countries.  Leaders should look to the example of George W Bush and PEPFAR, and then come up with an accelerated version.  If necessary, the US should just pony up and pay for it all.  Who cares if it costs the US alone $50 billion?  There will be logistical hurdles, as well, but those are easier to address with more resources. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 20, 2021, 08:47:35 PM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2021, 12:04:13 PM
I am not. As long as France and Germany are against (and they are), I am confident such tyranny will not pass.

Good, so the betting was cancelled.

We have a general, mandatory testing before going to the hospital or the doctor, keeping such institutions relatively virus-free. I think that makes sense, and that it's not tyranny. There hasn't been mentioning of people refusing that in our press, and what they do about them, but the medical, ethical principles probably mean that they'd have to treat critically sick anyway, under some extra-protected circumstances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 20, 2021, 11:07:08 PM
There is a lot of talk about vaccines preventing transmission and as we know from the yearly 'flu vaccines, this is not the case. Your flu shot might prevent you from getting it but it's just as likely to minimise the effects. The objective of the three Covid vaccines is the same. A quote from John Hopkins University website

In general, most vaccines do not completely prevent infection but do prevent the infection from spreading within the body and from causing disease.

The hope (and it's a strong one) is that these vaccines will turn Covid from pandemic to endemic. The first shots in Qld are being given from tomorrow morning in my home city Gold Coast. According to the rollout plan there will be 6.8 million Aussies who will get the jab before I do but I have no problem with that as they need it more than me. They are starting with Pfizer but I'll probably end up with the Astrazeneca.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 08:05:00 AM
On a smaller note (man I really accidentally kicked the hornet's yesterday) when it is time for me to be vaccinated they are coming right to my school.  I don't have to go anywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 21, 2021, 08:10:28 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 08:05:00 AMI don't have to go anywhere.


Convenient.  I will have to drive up to several whole miles and wait in line.  I'm hoping that 24 hour vaccination is available when I qualify, so I can go at 3:00 AM to avoid crowds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 08:14:42 AM
Smart.  If I had to, I would do the same mostly because I suffer from insomnia and frequently wake too early.  Might as well use it to my advantage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 10:28:27 AM
The question about vaccines reducing one's ability to transmit the infection to others has not been investigated enough yet, or the differences between the vaccines in that respect. But the most current view seems to be that they likely have at least some, or maybe a significant, effect. Concerning the parallel to flu vaccines, the point is made that covid-vaccines work more effectively on an individual, than flu-vaccines do, which will also influence the ability to spread the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 21, 2021, 10:42:19 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 10:28:27 AMConcerning the parallel to flu vaccines, the point is made that covid-vaccines work more effectively on an individual, than flu-vaccines do, which will also influence the ability to spread the virus.


There is not enough evidence to make such a claim. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 21, 2021, 11:04:53 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 21, 2021, 10:42:19 AM

There is not enough evidence to make such a claim.

Yes, that's right. We have no evidence which says that people, who are vaccinated and gets a milder infection, do not transmit the disease to others. Theoretically though they will excrete lesser quanta of virus and therefore tend to be less contagious .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 11:12:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 10:28:27 AM
Concerning the parallel to flu vaccines, the point is made that covid-vaccines work more effectively on an individual, than flu-vaccines do, which will also influence the ability to spread the virus.

In both cases the rapidity in which a virus can mutate makes it difficult to know or predict future efficacy rates.  Case in point, the efficacy of the various vaccines for the South African variant is not well known.  And with several major strains already present, who knows what the next mutations hold?  My point is that we are talking about moving targets. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 11:22:56 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 21, 2021, 11:04:53 AM
Yes, that's right. We have no evidence which says that people, who are vaccinated and gets a milder infection, do not transmit the disease to others. Theoretically though they will excrete lesser quanta of virus and therefore tend to be less contagious .

It's not just theoretically, but it's early, and the data aren't comprehensive.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00450-z

"... Preliminary analyses suggest that at least some vaccines are likely to have a transmission-blocking effect ... (...) (Israel:) one team observed a significant drop in viral load in a small number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the two to four weeks after receiving their first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, compared with those who caught the virus in the first two weeks after the injection2. "The data is certainly intriguing and suggestive that vaccination may reduce the infectiousness of COVID-19 cases (...) The Oxford–AstraZeneca trial also observed a larger reduction in viral load in a small group of vaccinated participants than in the unvaccinated group.


https://www.isglobal.org/en/covid-19-novedades-cientificas

((Israel) ..." preliminary results show a significant decrease in viral load among people over 60 years of age, one month after the vaccination rollout started in this age group. This suggests that vaccination may also impact on transmission." (...) (Catalonia:) Another analysis of 282 COVID-19 cluster (...) shows that the viral load was a leading driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. People with low viral load infected 12% of their contacts, while people with high viral load infected 24% of their contacts.)




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 21, 2021, 11:50:03 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 11:22:56 AM
It's not just theoretically, but it's early, and the data aren't comprehensive.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00450-z

"... Preliminary analyses suggest that at least some vaccines are likely to have a transmission-blocking effect ... (...) (Israel:) one team observed a significant drop in viral load in a small number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the two to four weeks after receiving their first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, compared with those who caught the virus in the first two weeks after the injection2. "The data is certainly intriguing and suggestive that vaccination may reduce the infectiousness of COVID-19 cases (...) The Oxford–AstraZeneca trial also observed a larger reduction in viral load in a small group of vaccinated participants than in the unvaccinated group.


https://www.isglobal.org/en/covid-19-novedades-cientificas

((Israel) ..." preliminary results show a significant decrease in viral load among people over 60 years of age, one month after the vaccination rollout started in this age group. This suggests that vaccination may also impact on transmission." (...) (Catalonia:) Another analysis of 282 COVID-19 cluster (...) shows that the viral load was a leading driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. People with low viral load infected 12% of their contacts, while people with high viral load infected 24% of their contacts.)

Thanks for the update. If this holds true it is good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 21, 2021, 11:57:35 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 11:22:56 AM
It's not just theoretically, but it's early, and the data aren't comprehensive.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00450-z

But still the authors of this article conclude:

But whether these observed reductions in viral load are sufficient to make someone less infectious in real life is not yet clear, say researchers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 12:10:12 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 21, 2021, 11:57:35 AM
But still the authors of this article conclude:

But whether these observed reductions in viral load are sufficient to make someone less infectious in real life is not yet clear, say researchers.

Yes. And of course, the second, quoted text then suggests otherwise. That's also why I included it, a study from The Lancet this month.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brian on February 21, 2021, 12:12:25 PM
Tens of thousands of appointments here got delayed due to our crazy weather, so my (and everyone else in the area's) estimated wait time just got an extra week added.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 21, 2021, 12:45:25 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 21, 2021, 12:10:12 PM
Yes. And of course, the second, quoted text then suggests otherwise. That's also why I included it, a study from The Lancet this month.

Yes, I have read it afterwards. It seems, that there are strong indications to support the claim, but more investigations need to be made. Good news BTW.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 21, 2021, 01:12:38 PM
Quote from: Brian on February 21, 2021, 12:12:25 PM
Tens of thousands of appointments here got delayed due to our crazy weather, so my (and everyone else in the area's) estimated wait time just got an extra week added.


I would not be surprised if you experience one or two or three more delays. 

An no less a celebrity than Tony Fauci now says that young kids won't get vaccinated until 2022: Anthony Fauci now says elementary students won't get vaccinated until early 2022, after high schoolers in fall (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/anthony-fauci-now-elementary-students-vaccinated-early-2022/story?id=76002276)

So herd immunity in the US is at least one year away.  Should we start a pool on whether it takes until Q2 2022?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 21, 2021, 01:27:20 PM
One thing I just heard on French TV was interesting, I've not checked to see if it's true.

Apparently this winter has seen a dramatic reduction in flu and gastroenteritis, presumably because people are washing their hands and not getting close to each other.

But we have NOT seen a reduction in COVID. Why not?

The proposed answer was that flu and gastroenteritis viruses are very fragile, they don't survive for long on surfaces, but COVID does.

And so, the suggestion is,  people are picking them up from touching surfaces - and the obvious place is the supermarket trolley. The handles are touched by many people and they are not cleaned systematically.

I for one will be wiping mine down next time I go.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 21, 2021, 02:22:53 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 21, 2021, 01:27:20 PM

And so, the suggestion is,  people are picking them up from touching surfaces - and the obvious place is the supermarket trolley. The handles are touched by many people and they are not cleaned systematically.

I for one will be wiping mine down next time I go.

The second reference in MusicTurner's post above writes:

It is now clear that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted predominantly through the air, by people talking and breathing out large droplets and aerosols. In contrast, catching the virus by touching infected surfaces seems to be rare.

BTW I never use the supermarket trolleys, but bring with me my own bag for the purpose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 21, 2021, 02:56:40 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 21, 2021, 02:22:53 PM
The second reference in MusicTurner's post above writes:

It is now clear that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted predominantly through the air, by people talking and breathing out large droplets and aerosols. In contrast, catching the virus by touching infected surfaces seems to be rare.

BTW I never use the supermarket trolleys, but bring with me my own bag for the purpose.

I have also seen stories asserting the passage in bold above.
But just to be safe, I always wear disposable gloves when shopping (keep a large box thereof in the car). One shop I frequent furnishes free latex gloves and requires their use.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 04:23:17 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 21, 2021, 02:22:53 PM
It is now clear that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted predominantly through the air, by people talking and breathing out large droplets and aerosols. In contrast, catching the virus by touching infected surfaces seems to be rare.

It seems like we've known this for many, many months now too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2021, 03:22:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 21, 2021, 01:27:20 PM
One thing I just heard on French TV was interesting, I've not checked to see if it's true.

Apparently this winter has seen a dramatic reduction in flu and gastroenteritis, presumably because people are washing their hands and not getting close to each other.

But we have NOT seen a reduction in COVID. Why not?

The proposed answer was that flu and gastroenteritis viruses are very fragile, they don't survive for long on surfaces, but COVID does.

And so, the suggestion is,  people are picking them up from touching surfaces - and the obvious place is the supermarket trolley. The handles are touched by many people and they are not cleaned systematically.

I for one will be wiping mine down next time I go.
At my co-op, they are extremely diligent:  line outside for people to stand 6' apart; hand sanitizer next to the entrance which they ask you to use before entering with gloves also available inside the inner door; they spray and wipe the cart handles before putting them back inside the store for incoming customers (they also have a kind of semi-portable hand wash stand just inside if you want to use it instead of hand sanitizer).  One supermarket does have someone to spray your cart if requested.  At a slightly smaller supermarket, you need to do it yourself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 04:04:05 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 21, 2021, 04:23:17 PM
It seems like we've known this for many, many months now too.

It is something that governments have been reluctant to take on board partly because of the cost to themselves (e.g. installing ventilation in schools) but mainly because of the cost to their backers (e.g. installing ventilation in the workplace.) Much better to put the focus on hand washing and face coverings,  then you can blame the public rather than their employers if it goes pear shaped. Capitalism in action.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 22, 2021, 05:06:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 04:04:05 AM
It is something that governments have been reluctant to take on board partly because of the cost to themselves (e.g. installing ventilation in schools) but mainly because of the cost to their backers (e.g. installing ventilation in the workplace.) Much better to put the focus on hand washing and face coverings,  then you can blame the public rather than their employers if it goes pear shaped. Capitalism in action.

I learned that fact directly from the CDC many months ago.  There is no government conspiracy at play.  Face coverings do protect against aerosols like covid.  Please don't lump them in together or be an anti-masker.  Masks and social distancing is the top most effective preventative measures that we can take.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 06:51:14 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 22, 2021, 05:06:57 AM
Masks . . .  is the top most effective preventative measures that we can take.

Is there any evidence for this?  I mean for the sort of face coverings people actually use, the way they actually use them, while going about their daily business?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 22, 2021, 07:50:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 06:51:14 AM
Is there any evidence for this?  I mean for the sort of face coverings people actually use, the way they actually use them, while going about their daily business?

If nothing else masks remind us to be cautious with our interactions in daily life. Invaluable for that alone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 08:14:29 AM
Info here in DK is that the standard paper masks typically protect against 63% of potential virus particles, and if combined with a good textile mask (but much less convenient of course), it's 92%.

Textile masks can be of poor quality, down to 30-40%, and people tend to re-use them too much. Authorities here will be introducing official markings for those guaranteeing an effect of 60-70%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 08:33:30 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 08:14:29 AM
Info here in DK is that the standard paper masks typically protect against 63% of potential virus particles, and if combined with a good textile mask (but much less convenient of course), it's 92%.

As I have read some time ago (don't recall where, but it was a Danish site) the standard masks protect relatively well against droplets but not so much against aerosols. Droplets fall rather fast to the floor, but aerosols can remain floating in the air for hours. This is why ventilation is important, and why the length of time one stays indoor is important. The longer time, the more aerosols you inhale to the lungs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 08:36:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 08:14:29 AM
Info here in DK is that the standard paper masks typically protect against 63% of potential virus particles, and if combined with a good textile mask (but much less convenient of course), it's 92%.

Textile masks can be of poor quality, down to 30-40%, and people tend to re-use them too much. Authorities here will be introducing official markings for those guaranteeing an effect of 60-70%.

Which standard of paper mask? How long do they protect at that level for? What happens if they're touched? Reworn after a few hours? What about non standard masks? What if they're not worn properly?

I've got a paper mask in my pocket, I'm not sure if it meets a standard, bought cheap ones from Amazon months ago, it has been in my pocket for about two months, rubbing against my wallet and keys, I get it out when I go into a shop, it seems to keep everyone happy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 08:51:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 08:36:31 AM
Which standard of paper mask? How long do they protect at that level for? What happens if they're touched? Reworn after a few hours? What about non standard masks? What if they're not worn properly?

I've got a paper mask in my pocket, I'm not sure if it meets a standard, bought cheap ones from Amazon months ago, it has been in my pocket for about two months, rubbing against my wallet and keys, I get it out when I go into a shop, it seems to keep everyone happy.

It's from a television report, I found the website content, mostly based on American, official sources. Here's the website version
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2021-02-11-dobbelt-mundbind-er-langt-mere-effektivt-viser-ny-forskning
They combined it with checking textile masks from interviewed people at a Copenhagen station, using a Danish expert and related equipment. There are some links to sources in English etc., you'd probably not want to use google translate.

It's the standard blue paper masks you'll tend to see everywhere. Obviously you have to cover your nose completely and press it tightly against the sides of the nose, etc.

No doubt this is simplified information, and of course it's being debated as well. Honestly I don't care about those details, the main thing for me is that there can be a, not insignificant, measurable effect, if they are used properly. That's about it, as far as I'm concerned. But I really think they should mark the measured effect better on the on the paper masks that are being sold, and easily decipherable.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 08:52:26 AM
Most of the standard masks we purchase in Denmark are produced in China but certificated by EU. Use only approved masks.

Use them only for four hours all in all and afterwards discard them, because they get wet with time from your humid expiratory air., and then their protective function is compromised.. If they get wet accidentally, you must also discard them.

When you wear a mask, you protect the surroundings more, than you are protected yourself. This is why I use both mask and standard visir at the same time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 08:57:46 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 22, 2021, 08:52:26 AM
Most of the standard masks we purchase in Denmark are produced in China but certificated by EU. Use only approved masks.

Use them only for four hours all in all and afterwards discard them, because they get wet with time from your humid expiratory air., and then their protective function is compromised.. If they get wet accidentally, you must also discard them.

When you wear a mask, you protect the surroundings more, than you are protected yourself. This is why I use both mask and standard visir at the same time.

Fair enough, but people don't do that. I don't do that. That's why I'm sceptical about the value of mask wearing in the real world -- obviously if people wore a "standard" mask properly, and for a limited time, that would be different, but it's not relevant.

There is a cost to "proper" masks which the UK government have left to the population to foot. That shows that they're not serious about masks IMO.

There's also a question of feasibility -- on hot public transport for example, the tube where there's no aircon, or in schools.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 09:07:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 08:57:46 AM
Fair enough, but people don't do that. I don't do that. That's why I'm sceptical about the value of mask wearing in the real world -- obviously if people wore a "standard" mask properly, and for a limited time, that would be different, but it's not relevant.

There is a cost to "proper" masks which the UK government have left to the population to foot. That shows that they're not serious about masks IMO.

There's also a question of feasibility -- on hot public transport for example, the tube where there's no aircon, or in schools.

Your remarks seem to be a combination of some different circumstances, but first and foremost personal attitude. Those masks cost around DKK 1 - 2 a piece here, that is, 10-20 pence, prices must be the same in the UK. Some parts of the population, depending on the degree of poverty, will feel this as costly, but the majority not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 09:12:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 08:57:46 AM
Fair enough, but people don't do that. I don't do that. That's why I'm sceptical about the value of mask wearing in the real world -- obviously if people wore a "standard" mask properly, and for a limited time, that would be different, but it's not relevant.

Yes, the protective value of masks grows of course with the number of people who wear masks. But the only thing each of us can do is to wear a mask ourself.

Quote from: Mandryka
There is a cost to "proper" masks which the UK government have left to the population to foot. That shows that they're not serious about masks IMO.

We can purchase approved masks for little cost. Many costs 2 DKr = ca. 1/4 EURO, but some stores sell them for half of that amount.

Quote from: Mandryka
There's also a question of feasibility -- on hot public transport for example, the tube where there's no aircon, or in schools.

Masks are uncomfortable to wear, no doubt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2021, 09:36:03 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 22, 2021, 07:50:19 AM
If nothing else masks remind us to be cautious with our interactions in daily life. Invaluable for that alone.
+1

I've seen news stories before regarding which types are the most effective.  They are now recommending wearing one of those blue medical masks (readily available at pharmacies in my area these days) with a cloth one over that.  The problem with just using the blue ones is that a gap develops around the middle of the cheek along the edges.

I also try and keep my distance even outside--though it's not always easy in stores.  Personally, I use hand sanitizer often, keep my hands away from my mouth, nose and eyes and wash my hands well when I get back home.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 09:40:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 09:07:35 AM
Your remarks seem to be a combination of some different circumstances, but first and foremost personal attitude. Those masks cost around DKK 1 - 2 a piece here, that is, 10-20 pence, prices must be the same in the UK. Some parts of the population, depending on the degree of poverty, will feel this as costly, but the majority not.

The masks which meet a standard are much more expensive in the UK. Everyone has to pay, no matter their financial status.

As far as whether my comments are a reflection of my personal attitude or not, I really don't know because I've never seen research into the uses and attitudes of mask against covid in the UK population. But quite frankly, I think you're wrong to be so dismissive. Of course things may well be different where you are.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2021, 09:45:23 AM
Interesting re costs.  Last time I checked they were much more expensive.  Some places (like the library) do also offer free masks for those who don't have one to use whilst in there.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 09:48:29 AM
Here's the mask page from a large popular UK pharmacy, so you can get an idea of costs. Presumably elsewhere they are price controlled or subsidised. But in the UK the government doesn't take it seriously enough for that. Even elderly and sick people have to pay the market rate.

https://lloydspharmacy.com/collections/face-masks?sortBy=shopify_production_products_price_asc
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2021, 09:54:49 AM
Interesting...thanks.  I may have to try ordering some 3-ply off Amazon.  I have a cloth mask made by a friend but it's hard to use as it has ties vs. ear loops.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 10:02:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 09:48:29 AM
Here's the mask page from a large popular UK pharmacy, so you can get an idea of costs. Presumably elsewhere they are price controlled or subsidised. But in the UK the government doesn't take it seriously enough for that. Even elderly and sick people have to pay the market rate.

https://lloydspharmacy.com/collections/face-masks?sortBy=shopify_production_products_price_asc

That is surprisingly, and too, expensive then, originally prices began like that in DK too - it says £6 for 10x paper masks.
I checked Tesco, and they're just very slightly cheaper, £5. I can see how this cuts off parts of the population.

One would think that there'd be a market for cheaper ones. Production costs must be low. Lidl.co.uk had none on their website. Aldi.co.uk had 10x for £ 3.99, which is a bit more reasonable https://www.aldi.co.uk/disposable-face-covering-10-pack/p/708234411104900,
but Aldis for example are indeed few and far between.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 10:07:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 09:48:29 AM
Here's the mask page from a large popular UK pharmacy, so you can get an idea of costs. Presumably elsewhere they are price controlled or subsidised. But in the UK the government doesn't take it seriously enough for that. Even elderly and sick people have to pay the market rate.

https://lloydspharmacy.com/collections/face-masks?sortBy=shopify_production_products_price_asc

That's a big problem. I see that the surgical paper masks are 2½ to 5 times more expensive in UK, than in my country. Half a year ago we also paid that much, but now they can be bought from convenience stores much cheaper.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 10:08:07 AM
Can I ask the Europeans here to let me know if their country helps some people pay for masks, and whether the retail price is controlled?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 10:29:10 AM
Not here, I think. Originally, the big supermarket chains decided to lower the prices, even covering losses, when masks became mandatory.

https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/coop-saetter-prisen-paa-mundbind-helt-i-bund/8249367)

Buying larger quantities online might be the cheapest option in some countries, but obviously, that's not for everyone to do.

They're cheap say in Carrefour supermarkets in France (10 cent), and in Dia supermarkets in Spain (18 cent).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 10:57:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 08:51:27 AM


It's the standard blue paper masks you'll tend to see everywhere. Obviously you have to cover your nose completely and press it tightly against the sides of the nose, etc.

---- the main thing for me is that there can be a, not insignificant, measurable effect, if they are used properly. That's about it, as far as I'm concerned. But I really think they should mark the measured effect better on the on the paper masks that are being sold, and easily decipherable.

The blue standard paper masks I have purchased at Føtex say about 98% bacterial filtration, which means that they also filtrate virus containing droplets of saliva, but probably not aerosols.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 22, 2021, 11:00:42 AM
Good, we have a Føtex nearby.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on February 22, 2021, 11:05:37 AM
As regards efficiency of masks, wearing two rather than one, also presumably offers additional protection. I started doing this just recently when going shopping, and to me it doesn't feel anymore uncomfortable than wearing one.

The idea occurred when things were getting a bit crazy here in London, with SA/Brazil variants also appearing on the horizon, and I saw a photo of Jo Biden wearing a couple as he got off a plane (yet another reason to celebrate his appearance perhaps ..). But yes, they are quite pricey.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 11:16:02 AM
Quote from: Iota on February 22, 2021, 11:05:37 AM
with SA/Brazil variants also appearing on the horizon,

Too much reality there for one evening, I'm out of here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 11:17:32 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 22, 2021, 10:57:31 AM
The blue standard paper masks I have purchased at Føtex say about 98% bacterial filtration, which means that they also filtrate virus containing droplets of saliva, but probably not aerosols.

Aren't bacteria much bigger though, so viruses can penetrate through holes which are too small for bacteria?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 22, 2021, 11:31:26 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 22, 2021, 11:17:32 AM
Aren't bacteria much bigger though, so viruses can penetrate through holes which are too small for bacteria?

Yes, vira are smaller than bacteria, but the corona-containing droplets of saliva are larger, and this is why they to some extent are filtered by the masks.When we breathe
we will expire a mixture of droplets and aerosols .Aerosols are very small, and will generally penetrate the masks. Every time one makes an expiration movement the small aerosols will become pushed through the mask because of the expiratory air pressure. Similarly we may inhale aerosols through the mask.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 22, 2021, 11:36:58 AM
Quote from: Iota on February 22, 2021, 11:05:37 AM
As regards efficiency of masks, wearing two rather than one, also presumably offers additional protection. I started doing this just recently when going shopping, and to me it doesn't feel anymore uncomfortable than wearing one.

The idea occurred when things were getting a bit crazy here in London, with SA/Brazil variants also appearing on the horizon, and I saw a photo of Jo Biden wearing a couple as he got off a plane (yet another reason to celebrate his appearance perhaps ..). But yes, they are quite pricey.

I've started doing this when shopping, since the CDC (USA) recommended it. But I've been wearing 2 of the blue surgical masks, which is probably not good. Need to get cloth masks for the outer layer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on February 22, 2021, 11:50:21 AM
Quote from: T. D. on February 22, 2021, 11:36:58 AM
I've started doing this when shopping, since the CDC (USA) recommended it. But I've been wearing 2 of the blue surgical masks, which is probably not good. Need to get cloth masks for the outer layer.

I wear 2 blue surgical masks too, and seeing as I can breathe comfortably in them, I'd have thought it must improve filtration levels too. Perhaps I'm wrong, I shall investigate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 02:59:53 AM
Both I and my wife tested positive today. For two days until last Sunday we have had symptoms of mild flu,  like 37.3 fever, mildly running nose and mildly sore throat, fatigue. Two years ago we'd have ignored them as insignifcant. The only thing that worried us is that I had diminished smell and taste, although today I felt an improvement in this respect. I have no idea where or how we caught it, we always wear masks and keep the distance.

Oh, well! All we can do is stay at home for a fortnight. I can see a massive dose of Haydn coming my way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 24, 2021, 05:23:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 02:59:53 AM
Both I and my wife tested positive today. For two days until last Sunday we have had symptoms of mild flu,  like 37.3 fever, mildly running nose and mildly sore throat, fatigue. Two years ago we'd have ignored them as insignifcant. The only thing that worried us is that I had diminished smell and taste, although today I felt an improvement in this respect. I have no idea where or how we caught it, we always wear masks and keep the distance.

Oh, well! All we can do is stay at home for a fortnight. I can see a massive dose of Haydn coming my way.

Remembering you in prayer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 06:04:47 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 24, 2021, 05:23:58 AM
Remembering you in prayer.

Most kind of you, Karl, and likewise.

Right now we don't have any symptoms and hope things will keep staying like that until March 9.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 24, 2021, 06:32:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 02:59:53 AM
Both I and my wife tested positive today. For two days until last Sunday we have had symptoms of mild flu,  like 37.3 fever, mildly running nose and mildly sore throat, fatigue. Two years ago we'd have ignored them as insignifcant. The only thing that worried us is that I had diminished smell and taste, although today I felt an improvement in this respect. I have no idea where or how we caught it, we always wear masks and keep the distance.

Oh, well! All we can do is stay at home for a fortnight. I can see a massive dose of Haydn coming my way.

For your both I hope it runs a mild course and for a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 24, 2021, 06:42:14 AM
I hope it is not too rough Florestan for you or your wife.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 24, 2021, 07:09:47 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 24, 2021, 06:32:44 AM
For your both I hope it runs a mild course and for a speedy recovery.

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on February 24, 2021, 07:37:57 AM
Hi Andrei,

yes, let's hope for only mild symptoms.
Kindest regards.

Peter
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on February 24, 2021, 07:51:07 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 24, 2021, 06:32:44 AM
For your both I hope it runs a mild course and for a speedy recovery.

+2

Haydn should be just the thing to keep up your spirits.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 24, 2021, 08:16:54 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 24, 2021, 06:32:44 AM
For your both I hope it runs a mild course and for a speedy recovery.
+3
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 24, 2021, 09:34:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 02:59:53 AM
Both I and my wife tested positive today. For two days until last Sunday we have had symptoms of mild flu,  like 37.3 fever, mildly running nose and mildly sore throat, fatigue. Two years ago we'd have ignored them as insignifcant. The only thing that worried us is that I had diminished smell and taste, although today I felt an improvement in this respect. I have no idea where or how we caught it, we always wear masks and keep the distance.

Oh, well! All we can do is stay at home for a fortnight. I can see a massive dose of Haydn coming my way.


îți doresc însănătoșire rapidă, să auzim numai de bine
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 09:56:39 AM
Thank you all, guys, your concern and kind words are much appreciated.

Quote from: Mandryka on February 24, 2021, 09:34:18 AM
îți doresc însănătoșire rapidă, să auzim numai de bine

Mulţumesc mult, să dea Dumnezeu!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on February 24, 2021, 10:05:31 AM
A sad, homemade sign posted in a neighbor's front yard, spotted on my daily constitutional: "Covid-19 Took My Friend." 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 24, 2021, 11:41:19 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 02:59:53 AM
Both I and my wife tested positive today. For two days until last Sunday we have had symptoms of mild flu,  like 37.3 fever, mildly running nose and mildly sore throat, fatigue. Two years ago we'd have ignored them as insignifcant. The only thing that worried us is that I had diminished smell and taste, although today I felt an improvement in this respect. I have no idea where or how we caught it, we always wear masks and keep the distance.

Oh, well! All we can do is stay at home for a fortnight. I can see a massive dose of Haydn coming my way.
All strength to you both Andrei. My thoughts are with you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on February 24, 2021, 12:06:11 PM
Recuperare rapidă, Andreï !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on February 24, 2021, 12:16:50 PM
Speedy recovery to you and yours, Andrei !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 24, 2021, 11:44:53 PM
Thank you all, gentlemen!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 25, 2021, 04:53:05 AM
While the people are away, the "mice" will play....

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/uk/rats-rise-lockdown-london-intl-gbr-scli/index.html

Shudder!  I'm glad that I'm spying more hawks in my neighborhood (or at least noticing the regulars more often).  As much as I enjoy seeing some of the birds at my neighbors' feeders, I also see a number of squirrels taking advantage of them....and I'm sure that there are other creatures taking advantage of the fallen seeds too.

I suspect that London isn't/won't be the only city or town dealing with an increase in vermin.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on February 25, 2021, 07:57:52 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 25, 2021, 04:53:05 AM
While the people are away, the "mice" will play....

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/uk/rats-rise-lockdown-london-intl-gbr-scli/index.html

Shudder!  I'm glad that I'm spying more hawks in my neighborhood (or at least noticing the regulars more often).  As much as I enjoy seeing some of the birds at my neighbors' feeders, I also see a number of squirrels taking advantage of them....and I'm sure that there are other creatures taking advantage of the fallen seeds too.

I suspect that London isn't/won't be the only city or town dealing with an increase in vermin.  :(

PD

Speaking of squirrels, not only are there more of them in my neighborhood than I can remember, ever (the result perhaps of fewer of them being run over during pandemic?), but they do not keep the distance from me they were wont to do pre-Covid.  It is not unusual now to have them come within two to three feet of me; perhaps a neighbor is feeding them out-of-hand.  Also, and this is going to sound peculiar:  pre-Covid squirrels seemed oblivious to human activity, though surely they were conscious of it.  Now I'm conscious of being observed.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Benji on February 25, 2021, 02:32:14 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 25, 2021, 04:53:05 AM
While the people are away, the "mice" will play....

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/uk/rats-rise-lockdown-london-intl-gbr-scli/index.html

Shudder!  I'm glad that I'm spying more hawks in my neighborhood (or at least noticing the regulars more often).  As much as I enjoy seeing some of the birds at my neighbors' feeders, I also see a number of squirrels taking advantage of them....and I'm sure that there are other creatures taking advantage of the fallen seeds too.

I suspect that London isn't/won't be the only city or town dealing with an increase in vermin.  :(

PD

I can confirm that this is very much true. The rats in my local park have multiplied noticeably and are now bold as brass. They just go about their business feet away from people with little fear. I have two regulars in my garden - a small one and a gigantic one. It is a constant struggle to keep them out of the compost bin - I have had to relocate it and essentially place it atop a couple of layers of steel mesh. Seems to be doing the job of stopping them burrowing in from beneath. I also switched to the bokashi method for food scraps, so nothing goes in the compost until it's well fermented. The rodents don't seem to like the pickled smell. I'm also switching my bird feeders to ones that don't allow for spillage onto the ground. I'm sure the squirrels will take up the challenge - they are smart things. Last summer one was trying to get into my house through a slightly ajar window, whilst I was right there watching it. Not sure what his game plan was once he was in (I did ask but, you know...).  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on February 25, 2021, 04:09:21 PM
Squirrels galore here too. Including a probable intruder in the attic space. We can hear the busy critter up there... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 25, 2021, 10:55:09 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 25, 2021, 04:53:05 AM
While the people are away, the "mice" will play....

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/uk/rats-rise-lockdown-london-intl-gbr-scli/index.html

Shudder!  I'm glad that I'm spying more hawks in my neighborhood (or at least noticing the regulars more often).  As much as I enjoy seeing some of the birds at my neighbors' feeders, I also see a number of squirrels taking advantage of them....and I'm sure that there are other creatures taking advantage of the fallen seeds too.

I suspect that London isn't/won't be the only city or town dealing with an increase in vermin.  :(

PD

I read there is a similar problem with rats in Rotterdam...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 26, 2021, 03:46:14 AM
As someone else here mentioned, I think that part of the problem (particularly re squirrels) is less car/vehicle traffic, but I also suspect that more people have put up bird feeders during this pandemic.  I do know, for example, from what Cornell has reported, that there are a lot more people bird watching these days....which I suspect would probably also have lead to a rise in people putting up feeders.  Good for the birds, but also good for other 'critters' too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 26, 2021, 04:59:53 AM
Could be Mother Nature reckoning, "Man's fouled up times enough, let's give the squirrels a chance."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on February 26, 2021, 06:50:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 26, 2021, 03:46:14 AM
As someone else here mentioned, I think that part of the problem (particularly re squirrels) is less car/vehicle traffic, but I also suspect that more people have put up bird feeders during this pandemic.  I do know, for example, from what Cornell has reported, that there are a lot more people bird watching these days....which I suspect would probably also have lead to a rise in people putting up feeders.  Good for the birds, but also good for other 'critters' too.

PD

I have cracked it! After years attempting to outwit squirrels and failing miserably I have come up with a sure fire winner, dried mealworms. Birds love them and squirrels are not interested. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on February 26, 2021, 07:11:01 AM
One thing I've noticed since the pandemic has hit has been the abundance of deer where I live. Some of them aren't scared of humans either as I saw someone out jogging and a deer walked right past this person like she was one of them. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on February 26, 2021, 07:15:55 AM
That's nice. We've seen a few foxes although they go the other way when they see the dogs. ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 26, 2021, 09:13:52 AM
Quote from: Irons on February 26, 2021, 06:50:39 AM
I have cracked it! After years attempting to outwit squirrels and failing miserably I have come up with a sure fire winner, dried mealworms. Birds love them and squirrels are not interested.
Dried mealworms?!  I'll ask you more about your solution, but I'll post it in the bird thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 26, 2021, 07:50:41 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on February 26, 2021, 07:15:55 AM
That's nice. We've seen a few foxes although they go the other way when they see the dogs. ;)

I hate them. One of them has managed to chew their way through the cable in the garden lighting, another has chewed through an irrigation pipe, a few weeks ago I was woken up by a foxy orgy. Honestly I'd get a gun and shoot the bastards if it wasn't for  having to sweep up the bodies and put them in the bin afterwards.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 26, 2021, 10:33:33 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 26, 2021, 07:50:41 PM
I hate them. One of them has managed to chew their way through the cable in the garden lighting, another has chewed through an irrigation pipe, a few weeks ago I was woken up by a foxy orgy. Honestly I'd get a gun and shoot the bastards if it wasn't for  having to sweep up the bodies and put them in the bin afterwards.

You'd also need a gun and from what I can gather gun ownership is very strictly controlled in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 27, 2021, 01:55:50 AM
Interesting documentary (BBC) for those who are curious about the possibilities in 2022 and after -- a bit British-centric maybe, but still interesting.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p093wpgw/cant-get-you-out-of-my-head-series-1-1-part-one-bloodshed-on-wolf-mountain
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on February 27, 2021, 06:48:02 AM
Quote from: Holden on February 26, 2021, 10:33:33 PM
You'd also need a gun and from what I can gather gun ownership is very strictly controlled in the UK.

Yeah, I once went on a visit to a gun club and made the mistake of telling a member the simplest method of screening would simply be to deny a licence to any man still living with his parents. Oops. :-[
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 02, 2021, 08:04:21 AM
Teachers in my state are eligible to receive the vaccine starting next week!  (I'm a teacher so this is good news for me)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 02, 2021, 08:18:10 AM
Quote from: André on February 25, 2021, 04:09:21 PM
Squirrels galore here too. Including a probable intruder in the attic space. We can hear the busy critter up there... ::)

Kill it quick. I've seen those little buggers ransack and defile homes. A neighbor, after being gone for a week, returned to find their mess all over and had to hire a cleaning service.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 02, 2021, 08:57:29 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 23, 2021, 02:45:42 AM
- there's a real lot of talk about vaccines being delayed here in DK (Pfizer, Astra Zeneca) but in reality it seems to be only for a few weeks, and media are not really mentioning the other vaccines that will be coming quite soon, such as Johnson & Johnson.
(...)

Rumours were a bit too optimistic about J&J, but now at least an approval of it is expected around the 11th of March. The EU, including DK, has massive orders waiting.

- Our PM Frederiksen is causing a stir with going, together with Israel and Austria, into a project for producing second-generation vaccines - that is, apparently outside EU cooperation.

- apparently, following the ebb-and-flow first weeks, vaccines, including Pfizer, will now be arriving on a quicker and larger scale here than expected, possibly giving hope for earlier vaccines.

- some local outbreaks causing special measures such as massive testing there, etc. Infection levels generally stable here, they say that the partial opening up since yesterday might cause a rise in a week or two.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 08:33:40 AM
I am vaccinated!  Pharmacy a town over was taking walk ins. I had the Moderna. I need to go in a month to receive the second.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 04, 2021, 08:42:49 AM
Congratulations - it's always nice to hear such stories!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 04, 2021, 08:56:30 AM
Congrats David!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 04, 2021, 10:02:29 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 08:33:40 AM
I had the Moderna.

Fancy...  :D   But seriously: congrats!

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 04, 2021, 10:21:50 AM
Bruno Moderna? Or aceto balsamico?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 04, 2021, 11:49:48 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 08:33:40 AM
I am vaccinated!  Pharmacy a town over was taking walk ins. I had the Moderna. I need to go in a month to receive the second.

Congratulations!  0:)

It has been looking like my turn is in July/August, but now they say Finland will be getting vaccines in bigger deliveries starting April so that non-risk groups could get vaccined 1-2 months sooner.

As of writing this, about 8 % have gotten the first dose and less than 2 % the second dose. The situation is getting worse fast because of the UK variant. Looks like lockdowns and even curfews.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 12:19:05 PM
Good news on the former, sad on the latter 71.  Our numbers (infection rates, deaths, percent positive, ICU and other hospitalization) have been in great decline here in SC.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 04, 2021, 04:23:32 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 12:19:05 PM
Good news on the former, sad on the latter 71.  Our numbers (infection rates, deaths, percent positive, ICU and other hospitalization) have been in great decline here in SC.

Yes, I know the numbers are coming down in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 07, 2021, 12:01:49 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 04, 2021, 08:33:40 AM
I am vaccinated!  Pharmacy a town over was taking walk ins. I had the Moderna. I need to go in a month to receive the second.
Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 07, 2021, 12:02:48 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 04, 2021, 11:49:48 AM
Congratulations!  0:)

It has been looking like my turn is in July/August, but now they say Finland will be getting vaccines in bigger deliveries starting April so that non-risk groups could get vaccined 1-2 months sooner.

As of writing this, about 8 % have gotten the first dose and less than 2 % the second dose. The situation is getting worse fast because of the UK variant. Looks like lockdowns and even curfews.
Am sorry to hear that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on March 07, 2021, 01:18:34 AM
Got the 1st vaccine dose yesterday (Astra Zeneca), much earlier than expected but won't complain. Seamless & thorough process at our local health centre.

Expected and light but noticeable side effects so far: light fever a couple of hours later yesterday, quite a sore injected arm since last night (not helping that I slept on it either!), still a bit achy and feverish overall this morning.

Nothing that an easy Sunday and some Debussy shouldn't cure  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 07, 2021, 01:50:16 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on March 07, 2021, 01:18:34 AM
Got the 1st vaccine dose yesterday (Astra Zeneca), much earlier than expected but won't complain. Seamless & thorough process at our local health centre.

Expected and light but noticeable side effects so far: light fever a couple of hours later yesterday, quite a sore injected arm since last night (not helping that I slept on it either!), still a bit achy and feverish overall this morning.

Nothing that an easy Sunday and some Debussy shouldn't cure  :)
My wife had those type of symptoms for a day or two Olivier - great that you have had the vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on March 07, 2021, 01:55:30 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on March 07, 2021, 01:18:34 AM
Got the 1st vaccine dose yesterday (Astra Zeneca), much earlier than expected but won't complain. Seamless & thorough process at our local health centre.

Expected and light but noticeable side effects so far: light fever a couple of hours later yesterday, quite a sore injected arm since last night (not helping that I slept on it either!), still a bit achy and feverish overall this morning.

Nothing that an easy Sunday and some Debussy shouldn't cure  :)

I had those symptoms back in October when I had my flu vaccination, I had no symptoms when I had my first AZ vaccination a few weeks ago but we have been warned the second dose might have side-effects.

Hope all continues to go well with you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 07, 2021, 02:43:19 AM
Quote from: Papy Oli on March 07, 2021, 01:18:34 AM
Got the 1st vaccine dose yesterday (Astra Zeneca), much earlier than expected but won't complain. Seamless & thorough process at our local health centre.

Expected and light but noticeable side effects so far: light fever a couple of hours later yesterday, quite a sore injected arm since last night (not helping that I slept on it either!), still a bit achy and feverish overall this morning.

Nothing that an easy Sunday and some Debussy shouldn't cure  :)

Big congrats from here too!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2021, 11:37:00 AM
To day I got my first shot with Pfizer vaccine.
Second shot planned to March 31.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 07, 2021, 12:05:02 PM
I get the jab Tuesday AM, the second date to be confirmed upon the first innoculation...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 07, 2021, 11:18:31 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2021, 11:37:00 AM
To day I got my first shot with Pfizer vaccine.
Second shot planned to March 31.

Hope you're pfeeling pfine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 07, 2021, 11:24:18 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2021, 11:37:00 AM
To day I got my first shot with Pfizer vaccine.
Second shot planned to March 31.

Congratulations, heard that things could be slow in Jutland ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2021, 11:41:46 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 07, 2021, 11:18:31 PM
Hope you're pfeeling pfine.

Thanks, No problems so pfar (20 hours after the shot).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2021, 11:44:33 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 07, 2021, 11:24:18 PM
Congratulations, heard that things could be slow in Jutland ...

Yes. things are happening somewhat slowly here, but I have been allocated to group 5 (Selected persons with conditions and diseases which entail a particularly increased risk of a serious course of COVID-19.), and this is why I was vaccinated earlier than my peers are going to be.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: springrite on March 08, 2021, 12:07:33 AM
I got mine in early October (second dose in late October), which made for a calm and peaceful winter, no nerves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 08, 2021, 12:33:21 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2021, 11:44:33 PM
Yes. things are happening somewhat slowly here, but I have been allocated to group 5 (Selected persons with conditions and diseases which entail a particularly increased risk of a serious course of COVID-19.), and this is why I was vaccinated earlier than my peers are going to be.

Thats good to hear my friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 08, 2021, 12:45:16 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 07, 2021, 11:18:31 PM
Hope you're pfeeling pfine.
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 08, 2021, 12:45:59 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 07, 2021, 12:05:02 PM
I get the jab Tuesday AM, the second date to be confirmed upon the first innoculation...
Good news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 08, 2021, 05:13:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 07, 2021, 11:24:18 PM
Congratulations.

Quote from: "Harry" on March 08, 2021, 12:33:21 AM
Thats good to hear my friend.

Quote from: vandermolen on March 08, 2021, 12:45:16 AM
+1

Thanks to all of you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 08, 2021, 05:18:14 AM
Quote from: springrite on March 08, 2021, 12:07:33 AM
I got mine in early October (second dose in late October), which made for a calm and peaceful winter, no nerves.

So you participated in the clinical trials?  Did they tell you after the fact whether you received the vaccine or a placebo?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 08, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Last day of quarantine for me and my wife today. We're fine, whatever mild symptoms we had are all but gone.

The interesting thing is that I talked to my doctor about the very bad symptoms* I had in 2020 around this same time of the year and about the fact that back then I thought that I might have had Covid-19 before it was even reported in Romania. He told me that it's quite possible I really had it and that's the reason why this year I had only mild symptoms: I might have developped antibodies back then.

*High fever 38/39, extreme fatigue, extremely sore throat, I could barely talk because of cough and I barely eat --- all that for a whole week. Can't remember about smell and taste but back then I wasn't very attentive to this aspect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 08, 2021, 07:44:05 AM
I thought that the antibodies were only supposed to last a few months?  Many people only suffer mild symptoms are are completely asymptomatic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 08, 2021, 08:22:22 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 08, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Last day of quarantine for me and my wife today. We're fine, whatever mild symptoms we had are all but gone.

The interesting thing is that I talked to my doctor about the very bad symptoms* I had in 2020 around this same time of the year and about the fact that back then I thought that I might have had Covid-19 before it was even reported in Romania. He told me that it's quite possible I really had it and that's the reason why this year I had only mild symptoms: I might have developped antibodies back then.

*High fever 38/39, extreme fatigue, extremely sore throat, I could barely talk because of cough and I barely eat --- all that for a whole week. Can't remember about smell and taste but back then I wasn't very attentive to this aspect.

How does quarantine work in Romania, Andrei? Do you get paid by the state if you're not earning because you can't get to work? How do you manage to get the groceries? Did your kids have to stay away from school?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 08, 2021, 08:28:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 08, 2021, 08:22:22 AM
How does quarantine work in Romania, Andrei? Do you get paid by the state? How do you manage to get the groceries? Did your kids have to stay away from school?

Yes, we got full paid sick leave (actually our revenues these two weeks were larger than the normal wage as Covid-related paid sick leave is tax-exempted  8) ) and our son had to stay at home with us. In order to go back to school he needs a negative test. We're going to test him tomorrow and I anticipate much screaming and moaning. :)

We did all our shoppings online and had them delivered to our door.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 08, 2021, 10:22:37 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 08, 2021, 08:28:05 AM
Yes, we got full paid sick leave (actually our revenues these two weeks were larger than the normal wage as Covid-related paid sick leave is tax-exempted  8) )


That's good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: springrite on March 08, 2021, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 08, 2021, 05:18:14 AM
So you participated in the clinical trials?  Did they tell you after the fact whether you received the vaccine or a placebo?
It was after the clinical trials but before it was approved for going into the market. So I got it just before everybody else.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 08, 2021, 07:02:19 PM
Quote from: springrite on March 08, 2021, 02:42:11 PM
It was after the clinical trials but before it was approved for going into the market. So I got it just before everybody else.

Wow you must have friends in high places!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: springrite on March 08, 2021, 09:30:36 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 08, 2021, 07:02:19 PM
Wow you must have friends in high places!
Well, counseling to save a marriage and family, without knowing at the time that she worked for Sinovac.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 09, 2021, 06:43:52 AM
Quote from: springrite on March 08, 2021, 09:30:36 PM
Well, counseling to save a marriage and family, without knowing at the time that she worked for Sinovac.

Sounds like karma. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 09, 2021, 12:57:01 PM
I'm scheduled for the first jab of the Moderna vaccine at a local drug store on Thursday. Feels strange to be so excited about a shot. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 09, 2021, 01:25:36 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 09, 2021, 12:57:01 PM
I'm scheduled for the first jab of the Moderna vaccine at a local drug store on Thursday. Feels strange to be so excited about a shot. :)

Be prepared to have a sore arm for 2-3 days.  Also pencil in sufficient time because they will hold you for 10-15 minutes to make sure that you don't have any adverse reactions.  Hope it goes smoothly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 09, 2021, 07:45:38 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 09, 2021, 12:57:01 PM
I'm scheduled for the first jab of the Moderna vaccine at a local drug store on Thursday. Feels strange to be so excited about a shot. :)

Yes it is an emotional thing, I suppose the stress of all of this takes its toll inevitably, and this is like a glimpse of light at the end of the tunnel.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 09, 2021, 08:03:12 PM
Effective tomorrow (10 Mar), I (63 y.o.) am finally in the current group of NY State residents (60+, down from 65) eligible to get a first dose (they don't say which vaccine)! There's a lot of pent-up demand:  tomorrow's appointments at the County-run site were fully booked within 25 minutes of the announcement. I'm hoping to get an appointment through a semi-local family-run (not chain) pharmacy, but doubt that I'll get scheduled for at least two weeks. The County and chain irons remain in the fire.

I figured all along that the best I could hope for was dose 1 by the end of March, so this is in line with expectations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 10, 2021, 12:03:03 AM
In Spain, where vaccination is progressing very slowly, there's a strange phenomenon going on: the initial adverse reaction to the vaccines seem only to affect those people who can take time off work due to those reactions. OTOH, retired people (the bulk of the vaccinated population so far) appear not to suffer any adverse reactions at all.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 10, 2021, 01:38:45 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 10, 2021, 12:03:03 AM
In Spain, where vaccination is progressing very slowly, there's a strange phenomenon going on: the initial adverse reaction to the vaccines seem only to affect those people who can take time off work due to those reactions. OTOH, retired people (the bulk of the vaccinated population so far) appear not to suffer any adverse reactions at all.  ;D

The reactions are not adverse reactions in the strict sense, but a sign of a reactive immune system. The immune system of younger people is more alert - therefore more reactions to the vaccine. Retired people are usually older and have a more inert immune system - therefore less reactions. We are told, that the reactions after the second jab may be stronger, probably because the immune system reacts more this time as it recalls it has been activated before by the first jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 10, 2021, 03:56:19 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 09, 2021, 01:25:36 PM
Be prepared to have a sore arm for 2-3 days.  Also pencil in sufficient time because they will hold you for 10-15 minutes to make sure that you don't have any adverse reactions.  Hope it goes smoothly!
I spoke to a neighbor a few days ago who had also reported having a sore arm for a few days...interesting.  Another friend said that she felt very tired for about two days.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on March 10, 2021, 04:03:04 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 10, 2021, 01:38:45 AM
The reactions are not adverse reactions in the strict sense, but a sign of a reactive immune system. The immune system of younger people is more alert - therefore more reactions to the vaccine. Retired people are usually older and have a more inert immune system - therefore less reactions. We are told, that the reactions after the second jab may be stronger, probably because the immune system reacts more this time as it recalls it has been activated before by the first jab.

Thanks for that information. I had my first Moderna shot last week with no adverse reaction at all (not even a sore arm). I was a little concerned because I believe some after effects are an indication the vaccine is working. Good to know my advanced years might be responsible for something positive!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 10, 2021, 04:24:07 AM
The day after my first jab, my upper arm (a little surprised at how high up on the arm I was impaled) is a bit heavy and painful.  But otherwise no reaction, positive or negative, and no tiredness.  Just an extraordinary feeling of glee that human genius may have outwitted this terrible disease.  Some people report being miraculously cured of long-standing complaints, like joint pain, etc., and while it may be that the immune system kicks into higher gear most medicos are skeptical of his, one surgeon saying, "The mind is a miraculous thing..."  :laugh:   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 10, 2021, 04:25:41 AM
Thank you, encoraging to hear such stories.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on March 10, 2021, 07:18:00 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 10, 2021, 04:24:07 AM
The day after my first jab, my upper arm (a little surprised at how high up on the arm I was impaled) is a bit heavy and painful.  But otherwise no reaction, positive or negative, and no tiredness.  Just an extraordinary feeling of glee that human genius may have outwitted this terrible disease.  Some people report being miraculously cured of long-standing complaints, like joint pain, etc., and while it may be that the immune system kicks into higher gear most medicos are skeptical of his, one surgeon saying, "The mind is a miraculous thing..."  :laugh:

I wish my mind was so easily fooled. My knee feels as cranky as ever.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 10, 2021, 04:53:01 PM
As usual this time of year I work as a volunteer for our Community Center's tax clinic. Started March 8, 4 afternoons every week until mid April. Covid has brought some logistical adjustments (hygiene, distance etc) but I am so thrilled to get out of home and be allowed to do something. I feel 10 years younger being around with people and doing something useful  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 10, 2021, 07:45:34 PM
My wife and I received our first Phizer shot on Monday with no side effects.

We live in Virginia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 11, 2021, 01:00:19 AM
Problems with the A-Z vaccine means another delay for the plans here in DK, and several other European countries; just a couple of weeks ago, the 27th of June was expected to be the day, when all of the adult population would have received their shot; then it was delayed until the 18th of July; today they now say mid-August, unfortunately.

Still hoping for quicker developments though. I might be into consideration say around early May.

A survey yesterday by a group of scientists concluded that the local lock-down has saved between 17.500 - 35.000 lives here, depending on the fatality of B117, that is still uncertain. Currently we are approaching 2400. The population is 5.8 mio.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 11, 2021, 10:45:21 AM
Got my first dose of Moderna today at a local pharmacy. No pain during or after the injection, no after effects of any kind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 11, 2021, 01:08:11 PM
Just got an appt. for Pfizer #1 on Sunday afternoon at the County site, slightly more than a 1 hour drive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 11, 2021, 02:14:26 PM
    I got a call from my provider saying they had extra vaccine and offering to give it to me today. I said thanks but no, I'm good.

    My appointment is tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 11, 2021, 02:51:17 PM
My wife's friend was informed at her inoculation site that choice of arm matters: if you're right-handed it's recommended that it be given the honor of the jab for improved distribution of the serum through greater use.  I designated the left because I wanted to use the right!  :o :laugh: 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 11, 2021, 03:29:22 PM

     My right is my mouse hand, my left is my coffee hand. What do I do?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 11, 2021, 05:57:12 PM
Quote from: drogulus on March 11, 2021, 03:29:22 PM
     My right is my mouse hand, my left is my coffee hand. What do I do?

I had a similar dilemma, drogulus, the only body part I don't use much is my brain and they refused to inoculate me there!  Seriously, I had to admire the guy right in front of me.  He came prepared, wearing his wife-beater! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 12, 2021, 02:03:27 AM
Not covid, but have a look at this, it is amazing. I want this to happen to me as I draw my last gasp.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/gallery/2021/mar/12/doctor-peyo-the-horse-comforting-cancer-patients-in-calais-in-pictures


(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/6f02b4c9f0a2b70925acfcc8a6bbef2be76d4bcb/0_0_6000_4000/master/6000.jpg?width=1920&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=38693f6724b6a295894d28afd769f4fc)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 12, 2021, 03:26:46 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 11, 2021, 05:57:12 PM
He came prepared, wearing his wife-beater!

Hah! In 2021 wife-beater became covid-beater!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 12, 2021, 03:58:08 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 12, 2021, 03:26:46 AM
Hah! In 2021 wife-beater became covid-beater!  ;D

Indeed!  ;D Who cares about fashion in the midst of a pandemic?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 12, 2021, 04:52:07 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 11, 2021, 10:45:21 AM
Got my first dose of Moderna today at a local pharmacy. No pain during or after the injection, no after effects of any kind.

Update: My arm hurt like it had been punched and bruised nine hours later.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brian on March 12, 2021, 05:03:13 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 11, 2021, 02:51:17 PM
My wife's friend was informed at her inoculation site that choice of arm matters: if you're right-handed it's recommended that it be given the honor of the jab for improved distribution of the serum through greater use.  I designated the left because I wanted to use the right!  :o :laugh:
My girlfriend (a scientist) got dose #1 in one arm and dose #2 in the other arm for this reason. I'm ambidextrous so it won't matter. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 12, 2021, 08:03:41 AM
The U.S. Is Sitting on Tens of Millions of Vaccine Doses the World Needs (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/11/us/politics/coronavirus-astrazeneca-united-states.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 12, 2021, 08:26:42 AM
Apparently Chile is now doing something right. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 12, 2021, 09:12:19 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on March 12, 2021, 04:52:07 AM
Update: My arm hurt like it had been punched and bruised nine hours later.

Okay that is pretty bad.  For me it was just sore when I fully extended it.  It only lasted 2-3 days.  I had no other side effects excepting an optimism for the future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on March 12, 2021, 11:41:23 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 12, 2021, 09:12:19 AM
Okay that is pretty bad.  For me it was just sore when I fully extended it.  It only lasted 2-3 days.  I had no other side effects excepting an optimism for the future.

Nah. It's not bad at all. Just didn't want to leave a misleading impression for those who haven't gotten stuck yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 12, 2021, 11:45:14 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 12, 2021, 09:12:19 AM
Okay that is pretty bad.  For me it was just sore when I fully extended it.  It only lasted 2-3 days.  I had no other side effects excepting an optimism for the future.
Hurrah!

Quote from: BasilValentine on March 12, 2021, 11:41:23 AM
Nah. It's not bad at all. Just didn't want to leave a misleading impression for those who haven't gotten stuck yet.
Glad that you're feeling better.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 13, 2021, 04:36:40 AM
News from a Danish stydy:

People with low virus levels are more contagious than expected. Researchers from the Statens Serum Institut (SSI) and the University of Copenhagen have in a new study found that people can infect others with corona, even if they only have a low amount of virus in their body

This is new knowledge, says Claus Nielsen, virologist and department head at SSI.
The study is based on the period from 25 August to 10 February among corona-infected people in Danish households with between two and six members. The results may indicate that the fast tests have difficulty in measuring any infection with the corona if only a modest amount of virus is present.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 14, 2021, 11:24:44 AM
The Latest: Paris may face new lockdown as ICUs fill up (https://apnews.com/article/pandemics-pakistan-islamabad-coronavirus-pandemic-europe-48d675ad33ab33fff3c78fe74e36dfcc)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 14, 2021, 11:27:19 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 14, 2021, 11:24:44 AM
The Latest: Paris may face new lockdown as ICUs fill up (https://apnews.com/article/pandemics-pakistan-islamabad-coronavirus-pandemic-europe-48d675ad33ab33fff3c78fe74e36dfcc)

France is a real mystery, Todd. They have more than 60% British Variant, and a fair amount of Brazil and South Africa. Schools and small shops are open. There is a curfew at night and weekend movement restrictions in two regions, and obviously theatres and restaurants are closed. But nevertheless for months and months the number of cases detected has been stable -- and only recently and regionally the hospitalisations have grown. At first it made me doubt the contagiousness of the British variant . . . it was just Boris's bad management that made the UK suffer so much. . .  we shall see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 14, 2021, 11:27:45 AM
Third Covid wave sweeps across EU and forces new restrictions

New variants blamed as Italy, France, Germany and Poland see infection rates surge (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/14/third-covid-wave-sweeps-across-eu-and-forces-new-restrictions)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 14, 2021, 11:31:30 AM
(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w08_2021w09_COVID_subnational_Last_2week.png?itok=orYtJrpB)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 14, 2021, 11:34:42 AM
Last month: Covid: EU's von der Leyen admits vaccine rollout failures (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56009251)

This month: EU defends Covid-19 vaccine distribution as countries complain it is uneven (https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20210313-eu-defends-covid-19-vaccine-distribution-as-countries-complain-it-is-uneven)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 14, 2021, 01:17:42 PM
Is there any reason to be concerned about the safety of the Astra Zeneca vaccine? 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 14, 2021, 01:24:05 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 14, 2021, 01:17:42 PM
Is there any reason to be concerned about the safety of the Astra Zeneca vaccine?

It's being investigated, it's too early to say, but the single fatality here in DK showed a rare blood reaction pattern, and there've been three unusual cases in Norway too, among younger health workers. Plus some fatalities at retirement homes. A few similar cases are known from Austria. Statistically, numbers seem very low so far, however.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 14, 2021, 03:18:23 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 12, 2021, 08:26:42 AM
Apparently Chile is now doing something right.

Good for Chile. They have secured supply of vaccines. They are planning to reach herd immunity by June.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on March 14, 2021, 03:53:44 PM
I got Pfizer #1 today at the County facility.
They strongly advised booking #2 (which was straightforward) before leaving, "otherwise it'll be difficult".
So my #2 is scheduled for April 5.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on March 14, 2021, 05:09:28 PM
Quote from: T. D. on March 14, 2021, 03:53:44 PM
I got Pfizer #1 today at the County facility.
They strongly advised booking #2 (which was straightforward) before leaving, "otherwise it'll be difficult".
So my #2 is scheduled for April 5.

I also got Pfizer 1 today. But they booked it for April 4, even though it's Easter Sunday.

They did overbook appointments: it took me over 2 hours in the drive through line to get the actual shot.

As of now, I feel like I have bad arthritis in my shoulder. OTOH, I do have arthritis in that shoulder so it may not be the shot that did it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 14, 2021, 10:07:05 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 14, 2021, 01:24:05 PM
It's being investigated, it's too early to say, but the single fatality here in DK showed a rare blood reaction pattern, and there've been three unusual cases in Norway too, among younger health workers. Plus some fatalities at retirement homes. A few similar cases are known from Austria. Statistically, numbers seem very low so far, however.

That's really interesting because it is prima facie inconsistent with the spin on things here. Here they're telling us  that the events which are causing concern in some overcautious European countries are common, and that in fact the numbers in the AZ vaccinated population are not at all worrying.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/mar/15/why-some-countries-have-suspended-the-astrazeneca-vaccine-and-what-it-means-for-australia-explainer
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 12:35:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 14, 2021, 10:07:05 PM
That's really interesting because it is prima facie inconsistent with the spin on things here. Here they're telling us  that the events which are causing concern in some overcautious European countries are common, and that in fact the numbers in the AZ vaccinated population are not at all worrying.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/mar/15/why-some-countries-have-suspended-the-astrazeneca-vaccine-and-what-it-means-for-australia-explainer

But now things are looking more serious

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/14/ireland-suspends-oxford-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-over-blood-clot-concerns
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 15, 2021, 07:27:44 AM
(https://plus.lesoir.be/sites/default/files/dpistyles_v2/ena_16_9_extra_big/2021/03/14/node_360778/27970014/public/2021/03/14/B9726426216Z.1_20210314234105_000+GA3HPAG26.1-0.jpg?itok=BlRQAUlb1615761671)

« I'm not worried about Covid. I want the shot against Astra Zeneca »
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 07:33:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 12:35:41 AM
But now things are looking more serious

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/14/ireland-suspends-oxford-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-over-blood-clot-concerns

Why? Only a few days ago Ireland was begging for AZ vaccines from the US; they were turned down. If the US had given them the one million doses they wanted do you think they would now be refusing to use them. There have been no more cases of blood clots in Ireland or anywhere else but now Germany has joined in the 'me too' hysteria. Good luck to them. I am waiting for my second AZ vaccination, due in around six weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 15, 2021, 07:35:07 AM
Whether the concerns about AstraZeneca are in the end proven to be objectively justified or not, after months of back-and-forth on effectiveness and side effects its reputation is now effectively dead.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 07:42:45 AM
Quote from: Que on March 15, 2021, 07:35:07 AM
Whether the concerns about AstraZeneca are in the end proven to be objectively justified or not, after months of back-and-forth on effectiveness and side effects its reputation is now effectively dead.

Yes, of course it is and I am sure all these European countries will now cancel their orders and stop blocking exports to the countries that want to use it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 15, 2021, 08:36:34 AM
Quote from: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 07:42:45 AM
Yes, of course it is and I am sure all these European countries will now cancel their orders and stop blocking exports to the countries that want to use it.

We'll see how this develops. Public trust in the safety and reliability of vaccines is crucial to a successful campaign.

To my knowledge far export from the EU has been blocked once: 250.000 doses from Italy with destination Australia.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 15, 2021, 08:43:02 AM
Quote from: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 07:42:45 AM
Yes, of course it is and I am sure all these European countries will now cancel their orders and stop blocking exports to the countries that want to use it.

You seem to forget that Zeneca exported their vaccins to England, which were meant for the Netherlands and other European countries, just so that Johnson could make a big gesture to his voters. I sit very close to to the source were this is common knowledge. And by the way they also block all the Zeneca vaccins to Europe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 08:50:50 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 15, 2021, 08:43:02 AM
You seem to forget that Zeneca exported their vaccins to England, which were meant for the Netherlands and other European countries, just so that Johnson could make a big gesture to his voters. I sit very close to to the source were this is common knowledge. And by the way they also block all the Zeneca vaccins to Europe.

I bow to your superior knowledge and will comment no further.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 11:00:49 AM
Quote from: Biffo on March 15, 2021, 07:33:37 AM
Why? Only a few days ago Ireland was begging for AZ vaccines from the US; they were turned down. If the US had given them the one million doses they wanted do you think they would now be refusing to use them. There have been no more cases of blood clots in Ireland or anywhere else but now Germany has joined in the 'me too' hysteria. Good luck to them. I am waiting for my second AZ vaccination, due in around six weeks.

Because that article suggests that we're seeing something much rarer than Deep Vein Thrombosis, maybe disseminated intravascular clotting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 11:04:39 AM
Quote from: Que on March 15, 2021, 07:35:07 AM
Whether the concerns about AstraZeneca are in the end proven to be objectively justified or not, after months of back-and-forth on effectiveness and side effects its reputation is now effectively dead.

That would be a catastrophe for Europe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 11:10:45 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 15, 2021, 08:43:02 AM
You seem to forget that Zeneca exported their vaccins to England, which were meant for the Netherlands and other European countries, just so that Johnson could make a big gesture to his voters. I sit very close to to the source were this is common knowledge. And by the way they also block all the Zeneca vaccins to Europe.

Is there any evidence for this, other than your testimony?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 15, 2021, 11:33:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 11:04:39 AM
That would be a catastrophe for Europe!

I'm actually surprised by this turn of events. Noises on AstraZeneca were positive again a few weeks ago, and now this!
If the vaccine would be out of the race, it would be bad news indeed. As I said, I think there could be no coming back from this... unfortunately.... But public trust is critical.

I'm also sorry to see that this whole incident is connecting to anti-EU sentiments. We're not the enemy, despite what the UK govt and the tabloids want the UK public to believe.

But all might not be lost yet. Pfizer and Moderna are ramping up production and the vaccine by Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) is a latecomer that seems very promising: a single shot that doesn't need deep freeze conditions with a high success rate and little and mild side effects.

In several months we'll have sufficient vaccines to vaccinate the entire EU population many times over.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 15, 2021, 11:46:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 15, 2021, 11:10:45 AM
Is there any evidence for this, other than your testimony?


Yes of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 15, 2021, 02:50:12 PM
I've been reading stories of Covid protests in Spain, Greece, France, and now the Netherlands.  What has happened to Europe? 


(https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-03-14T153449Z_1960947942_RC23BM90224D_RTRMADP_3_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-NETHERLANDS-PROTESTS.jpg?resize=770%2C513)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 16, 2021, 12:00:22 AM
Benefits of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine outweigh any risk, says EMA (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/15/germany-suspends-oxford-vaccine-over-blood-clot-fears)

From a scientific and policy perspective such a position makes perfect sense.

But it's not the message people that are asked to take the vaccine want to hear....


And:

Europe's caution over Oxford vaccine about more than the science (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/15/europes-caution-over-oxford-vaccine-about-more-than-the-science)

Interesting quote:

"But the other factor in deciding on suspension could even be supply. In the UK, there are plentiful stocks. In Europe, there are not. AstraZeneca has just cut its proposed deliveries again, down to 30m doses in the first quarter, which is about a third of what was originally promised. Suspending the vaccine is easier in Europe if it is not available in great quantities anyway."

Looks like AstraZeneca's has dug its own grave with its supply policies, at least its position in the EU.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 16, 2021, 12:13:12 AM
Any medication carries the risk of side effects. To stop vaccinating because a miniscule percentage of the population might get a possible (as yet unproved) reaction is simply dumb! Allergic reactions to penicillin are well known but it proved to be a wonder drug. (I am one of those with the allergy). Should it have been stopped because of those reactions. Of course not. The alternatives didn't bear thinking about.

I've always been aware of the 'luck of the draw' aspect to life. Life is a lottery and it can end so quickly. How do you know that your next car trip won't involve an unavoidable (by you) accident that ends your life. You don't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 16, 2021, 12:35:03 AM
People's behaviour is not rational.

Everybody knows, or should know, that participating in traffic is one of the most dangerous daily activities.
But that doesn't stop anybody, because they need to go places. Using train or bus is saver than driving. Yet, even if there is a choice, most will drive their own car. The airplane is one of the safest modes of transportation, yet many people are deadly  afraid of flying.

How appealing does this really sound?

"Here is a vaccine. Looking at various risks you are wise to take it, but you might die because of it."

And we are asking healthy young people to take the vaccine as well.
A group that runs a very low risk by the disease. Perhaps a risk still higher than from taking the vaccine, but it will probably not perceived as such

Q


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 12:52:36 AM
We need to know how serious these unwanted events are, and who's getting them. They may be very serious and they may be only with younger people (under 50) I notice that the Norwegian government issued this

QuotePeople under the age of 50 who have received the AstraZeneca vaccine and feel increasingly unwell more than three days after vaccination, and who notice larger or smaller blue spots in the skin (skin haemorrhages) must consult a doctor or out-of-hours medical service as soon as possible.

https://www.fhi.no/en/news/2021/norwegian-medicines-agency-notified-of-blood-clots-and-bleeding-in-younger-/

It sounds to me as though the reaction the Norwegians are seeing is quite rare but extremely serious. And the problem is in under 50s.

Just a question for medics - how common are skin legions in under 50s? I mean, are Norwegian doctors going to be inundated with false alarms? If so, either they've goofed issuing that or they are very worried indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 12:57:48 AM
The Uk has not released any info about these AZ incidents in Britain. I would be surprised if they have not occurred.

Question: are they right to keep it under a hat?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 01:54:39 AM
Some more details about what the complications with AZ are

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2021/mar/16/coronavirus-live-news-keep-using-astrazenecaoxford-vaccine-says-who


QuoteThis type of cerebral vein throbosis in combination with a hemolytic-uremic syndrome phenomenon is so rare that it can probably be traced back to the vaccination," . . .

"The additional cases are of the order of magnitude that they could affect one in 250,000 - 350,000 people," Lauterbach said. It is a serious complication, he added, "but you can usually take action against this complication during treatment."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 16, 2021, 02:49:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 12:52:36 AM
Just a question for medics - how common are skin legions in under 50s? I mean, are Norwegian doctors going to be inundated with false alarms? If so, either they've goofed issuing that or they are very worried indeed.

Spontaneous skin bleedings are rare and indicate usually some often serious underlying patological cause.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 16, 2021, 08:40:17 AM
Quote from: Que on March 15, 2021, 11:33:21 AM
I'm actually surprised by this turn of events. Noises on AstraZeneca were positive again a few weeks ago, and now this!
If the vaccine would be out of the race, it would be bad news indeed. As I said, I think there could be no coming back from this... unfortunately.... But public trust is critical.

I'm also sorry to see that this whole incident is connecting to anti-EU sentiments. We're not the enemy, despite what the UK govt and the tabloids want the UK public to believe.

But all might not be lost yet. Pfizer and Moderna are ramping up production and the vaccine by Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) is a latecomer that seems very promising: a single shot that doesn't need deep freeze conditions with a high success rate and little and mild side effects.

In several months we'll have sufficient vaccines to vaccinate the entire EU population many times over.

Q

Blimey Que I am beginning to think you have a problem. I thought the same thing only the complete opposite. The good folk in the EU are bashing AZ for political reasons and to cover up their own inadequacies. But common sense prevailed and I dismissed the thought. Perhaps you should do the same?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 16, 2021, 10:37:43 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 16, 2021, 08:40:17 AM
Blimey Que I am beginning to think you have a problem. I thought the same thing only the complete opposite. The good folk in the EU are bashing AZ for political reasons and to cover up their own inadequacies. But common sense prevailed and I dismissed the thought. Perhaps you should do the same?

I don't see how you can blame me for sentiments expressed by others?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 12:20:18 PM
https://twitter.com/olivernmoody/status/1371822984000847874?s=21

An interesting account of what prompted Germany to suspend AZ.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 16, 2021, 01:29:14 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 16, 2021, 12:13:12 AM
Any medication carries the risk of side effects. To stop vaccinating because a miniscule percentage of the population might get a possible (as yet unproved) reaction is simply dumb! Allergic reactions to penicillin are well known but it proved to be a wonder drug. (I am one of those with the allergy). Should it have been stopped because of those reactions. Of course not. The alternatives didn't bear thinking about.

I've always been aware of the 'luck of the draw' aspect to life. Life is a lottery and it can end so quickly. How do you know that your next car trip won't involve an unavoidable (by you) accident that ends your life. You don't.

+1

The vaccine suspension created and now feeds a spiral of fear. More countries suspend because other countries have done it, not because of proven ill-effects. Governments fear they might be perceived as reckless if they don't suspend the AZ vaccine - and see their polls go down as a result. The net result is that global vaccination is slowed, meaning more deaths from Covid than might have been feared - a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 16, 2021, 01:46:05 PM
Well they've suspended to give the scientists the chance to assess the risk, in the light of these new events. And given that the events are very serious, and that the EMA should report on Thursday,  I think they were right. For one thing, if individuals aren't fully informed, how can they make a decision about whether to be vaccinated or not? And for another, without the scientists' considered guidance, how can states decide who to offer the vaccines to?

It's not just a matter of the consequentialist calculation of "more deaths" that André refers to, it's also a matter of individuals being put into a position where they can make the best choices for themselves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 16, 2021, 01:52:37 PM
Quote from: Que on March 16, 2021, 10:37:43 AM
I don't see how you can blame me for sentiments expressed by others?

OK, but sentiments that fit your narrative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 16, 2021, 02:07:59 PM
Quote from: André on March 16, 2021, 01:29:14 PM
+1

The vaccine suspension created and now feeds a spiral of fear. More countries suspend because other countries have done it, not because of proven ill-effects. Governments fear they might be perceived as reckless if they don't suspend the AZ vaccine - and see their polls go down as a result. The net result is that global vaccination is slowed, meaning more deaths from Covid than might have been feared - a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Agreed. Irresponsible to cast doubt in people's minds with false information - Twitter does a good job of that already (so I am told). It does make you wonder when first it was claimed AZ was ineffective for the over 65's which was disproved and now this.
I think as some forum members reading this thread have received the AZ jab it should be discussed with sensitivity. Just saying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 16, 2021, 02:14:25 PM
This article is a good read on the Vaccine conundrum:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/03/16/world/covid-19-coronavirus


(https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/03/16/world/covid-19-coronavirus)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 12:02:26 AM
Things going quite OK here in DK, a stable situation for weeks with relatively small infection rates (0.25 - 0.35 % of tests), massive testing (yesterday saw more than  5% of the entire population on a single day), fatalities going down with 90% or more, compared to a couple of months ago. B117 is now 93% of infections; all infections are screened, as opposed to some other countries. But in relation to plans for further opening up, worries are that a third wave might hit us as well.

I've had 5 PCR tests too within a few weeks, due to medical ongoings, they have been very varied as regards unpleasantness. Always negative results. And none of my closer acquaintances have been sick, touch wood. But we all really long for that vaccine and being able to relax more and return to more normality.

Concerning the AZ, it seems that blood clots have maybe actually been fewer than in the average population, and it will probably stay in circulation, perhaps with a few restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2021, 12:20:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 12:02:26 AM
Things going quite OK here in DK, a stable situation for weeks with relatively small infection rates (0.25 - 0.35 % of tests), massive testing (yesterday saw more than  5% of the entire population on a single day), fatalities going down with 90% or more, compared to a couple of months ago. B117 are now 93% of infections; all infections are screened, as opposed to some other countries. But in relation to plans for further opening up, worries are that a third wave might hit us as well.

I've had 5 PCR tests too within a few weeks, due to medical ongoings, they have been very varied as regards unpleasantness. Always negative results. And none of my closer acquaintances have been sick, touch wood. But we all really long for that vaccine and being able to relax more and return to more normality.


How much UK variant do you have?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 12:35:14 AM
The most common UK variant is B117 (B 1.1.7), now 93% here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 17, 2021, 12:47:00 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 12:35:14 AM
The most common UK variant is B117 (B 1.1.7), now 93% here.

It's interesting that you have it under control, and the UK had struggled so much with that before vaccination. Are schools and shops open?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 04:38:04 AM
Shops are, but some not (hairdressers etc), and schools for the younger pupils. Older pupils only share a weekly day outdoors, the remaining time is via computer learning at home etc. Some boarding schools etc. are open, but they require frequent testing.

However, more opening up is expected to be announced next week. The little affected island of Bornholm is already laboratory ground for more openings, based on more testing.

Summer holiday options/tourism, the cultural sector, and eating out, will be particularly interesting news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 17, 2021, 05:00:08 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 16, 2021, 01:52:37 PM
OK, but sentiments that fit your narrative.

Your assumptions are mistaken.

I'm well aware that anything relating to the AZ vacvine has been politicised in both the UK and the EU, but to me this is not a political/adverserial issue.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 17, 2021, 07:23:09 AM
Quote from: Que on March 17, 2021, 05:00:08 AM
Your assumptions are mistaken.

I'm well aware that anything relating to the AZ vacvine has been politicised in both the UK and the EU, but to me this is not a political/adverserial issue.

Q

Good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2021, 11:29:30 AM
The state's [Mass.]vaccination rollout has improved, but the full picture is more complex. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/03/13/nation/states-vaccination-rollout-has-improved-full-picture-is-more-complex/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 03:16:27 PM
Interesting. According to the Berlingske newspaper, Danish professor Niels Høiby suggesting that the few cases of serious AZ problems may simply come from a failed technique during vaccination, resulting in the vaccine getting immediately into the blood, which it shouldn't - it's meant to go deep into the muscles, and the procedure should test the chosen spot, before the actual shot. You shouldn't press the skin so much, that you can't check if there's a blood vein there. It's been given to young health staff and the cases thus caused a lot of attention, but basically that possible error applies to all vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 17, 2021, 03:32:38 PM
My neighbor, a QAnon follower, begged me this afternoon not to get the vaccination.  Her husband calls her delusional (and there may be a serious rift looming in their marriage).
I agree with him, she is, but she also happens to be a very nice person - or as nice as is possible considering the beliefs they espouse.  I did not have the heart (courage?; candor?) to tell her I've already received Shot No. 1. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2021, 08:47:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 03:16:27 PM
Interesting. According to the Berlingske newspaper, Danish professor Niels Høiby suggesting that the few cases of serious AZ problems may simply come from a failed technique during vaccination, resulting in the vaccine getting immediately into the blood, which it shouldn't - it's meant to go deep into the muscles, and the procedure should test the chosen spot, before the actual shot. You shouldn't press the skin so much, that you can't check if there's a blood vein there. It's been given to young health staff and the cases thus caused a lot of attention, but basically that possible error applies to all vaccines.

Even if the instruction of the Danish "Statens Seruminstitut" doesn't imply aspiration before injection of the vaccine to see if it is located in a vessel, I don't think intravascular injection is the most important reason for the serious adverse reactions to the A-Z vaccine. If this was so, it would be a much more common reaction. The decisive factor is probably an unusually fast and strong reacting immune system. And I don't know if they do aspiration before injection in Norway and Austria.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 19, 2021, 08:57:59 AM
There are some new investigation results into the matter about the causes now, from Norwegian and German doctors, both declaring that they've found something, yet this was announced after the EMA press release, and the exact results are still hazy, they might become more specified soon. It might-might be a combination of several factors, given their rarity (apparently less than 100 clots in 20 mio cases).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 19, 2021, 09:03:10 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 19, 2021, 08:57:59 AM
There are some new investigation results into the matter about the causes now, from Norwegian and German doctors, both declaring that they've found something, yet this was announced after the EMA press release, and the exact results are still hazy, they might be more specified soon. It might-might be a combination of several factors, given their rarity (apparently less than 100 clots in 20 mio cases).

This sort of thing?

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/KyGv2G/professor-says-cause-of-rare-bloodclots-in-people-vaccinated-with-astrazeneca-has-been-found
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 19, 2021, 09:05:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 19, 2021, 09:03:10 AM
This sort of thing?

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/KyGv2G/professor-says-cause-of-rare-bloodclots-in-people-vaccinated-with-astrazeneca-has-been-found

Exactly, and I still think some details are missing. They say it's the vaccine, but ... for example, why, in those cases?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 19, 2021, 09:08:29 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 19, 2021, 09:05:39 AM
Exactly, and I still think some details are missing. They say it's the vaccine, but ... for example, why, in those cases?

Ah yes, well, that's the $1,000,000 question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 19, 2021, 11:30:39 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 19, 2021, 09:05:39 AM
Exactly, and I still think some details are missing. They say it's the vaccine, but ... for example, why, in those cases?

It seems to be the combination of a hyperreactive immune system and this particular vaccine, which elicits the DIC syndrome, but obviously more investigation is needed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2021, 08:03:51 PM
On a personal note, I've just scheduled a vaccine appointment for a week from today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on March 20, 2021, 02:49:56 AM
Strange there hasn't been much discussion of the Pfizer vaccine and blood clots.

https://www.businesstelegraph.co.uk/coronavirus-pfizers-covid-vaccine-is-linked-to-more-blood-clots-than-astrazenecas-in-the-uk/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 20, 2021, 03:30:58 AM
Quote from: Biffo on March 20, 2021, 02:49:56 AM
Strange there hasn't been much discussion of the Pfizer vaccine and blood clots.

https://www.businesstelegraph.co.uk/coronavirus-pfizers-covid-vaccine-is-linked-to-more-blood-clots-than-astrazenecas-in-the-uk/

No mention of disseminated intravascular coagulation, that's why.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 20, 2021, 03:32:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2021, 08:03:51 PM
On a personal note, I've just scheduled a vaccine appointment for a week from today.

Good job, er jab! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 20, 2021, 03:50:26 AM
Research leader Andreas Greinacher, head research.

Researchers at the University of Greifswald in Germany have most likely found a solution for patients who develop the extremely rare combination of thrombosis and a sudden shortage of platelets (thrombocytopenia) after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine.
It seems that patients who show these concomitant symptoms after the injection should be treated with other anticoagulants than the commonly used heparin, the Germans have discovered.
A Norwegian research group from the university hospital in Oslo came to a similar conclusion independently of the German researchers.


Heparin can cause HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. When a patient develops HIT, the heparin causes an overreaction of the immune system, causing the platelets to be used at a rapid rate and a deficiency. In addition, the platelets also cause blood clots in the brain.

None of the seven German patients who developed the rare combination of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia had received heparin. In their case, the disease process may have been triggered by vaccination.
"If you come across a patient with that ultra, ultra rare complication," says thrombosis expert and head of internal medicine at Radboudumc Saskia Middeldorp, "you should immediately give an anticoagulant other than heparin and take a HIT test."
Middeldorp is very enthusiastic about the discovery of her German colleague Andreas Greinacher and his team from the medical faculty at the University of Greifswald, in the far north of Germany near the Polish border.
"This is a discovery that can have enormous consequences, we now know what to do if this particular complication occurs in a patient. And we can allay the fear that has arisen from the reports of the occurrence of this complication. We have been emailing coagulation specialists internationally all afternoon about the implications of these findings. Everyone is very enthusiastic. "
Middeldorp emphasizes that the advice to resume vaccinations with the AstraZeneca vaccine will not change. "The benefits really far outweigh the drawbacks. This possible side effect is really very rare."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2021, 06:21:33 AM
U.S. to share 4 million doses of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine with Mexico, Canada (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-mexico-idUSKBN2BA22S)

Whoever came up with this policy choice deserves kudos.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 20, 2021, 06:24:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2021, 08:03:51 PM
On a personal note, I've just scheduled a vaccine appointment for a week from today.

Good to hear.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 20, 2021, 07:56:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 19, 2021, 08:03:51 PM
On a personal note, I've just scheduled a vaccine appointment for a week from today.

Awesome!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2021, 08:01:06 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 20, 2021, 07:56:57 AM
Awesome!

I'm pumped! And I don't have to go to either Gillette Stadium or Fenway Park!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 20, 2021, 08:12:31 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 20, 2021, 03:50:26 AM
Research leader Andreas Greinacher, head research.

Researchers at the University of Greifswald in Germany have most likely found a solution for patients who develop the extremely rare combination of thrombosis and a sudden shortage of platelets (thrombocytopenia) after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine.
It seems that patients who show these concomitant symptoms after the injection should be treated with other anticoagulants than the commonly used heparin, the Germans have discovered.
A Norwegian research group from the university hospital in Oslo came to a similar conclusion independently of the German researchers.


Heparin can cause HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. When a patient develops HIT, the heparin causes an overreaction of the immune system, causing the platelets to be used at a rapid rate and a deficiency. In addition, the platelets also cause blood clots in the brain.

None of the seven German patients who developed the rare combination of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia had received heparin. In their case, the disease process may have been triggered by vaccination.
"If you come across a patient with that ultra, ultra rare complication," says thrombosis expert and head of internal medicine at Radboudumc Saskia Middeldorp, "you should immediately give an anticoagulant other than heparin and take a HIT test."
Middeldorp is very enthusiastic about the discovery of her German colleague Andreas Greinacher and his team from the medical faculty at the University of Greifswald, in the far north of Germany near the Polish border.
"This is a discovery that can have enormous consequences, we now know what to do if this particular complication occurs in a patient. And we can allay the fear that has arisen from the reports of the occurrence of this complication. We have been emailing coagulation specialists internationally all afternoon about the implications of these findings. Everyone is very enthusiastic. "
Middeldorp emphasizes that the advice to resume vaccinations with the AstraZeneca vaccine will not change. "The benefits really far outweigh the drawbacks. This possible side effect is really very rare."


Thanks Harry
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2021, 02:10:24 PM
Good news Karl!  Happy to hear that.

I just ran across this article:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56436927

It's about a Covid outbreak at Trump's Florida residence....and upcoming events scheduled there.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 21, 2021, 05:41:42 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 20, 2021, 03:50:26 AM

Researchers at the University of Greifswald in Germany have most likely found a solution for patients who develop the extremely rare combination of thrombosis and a sudden shortage of platelets (thrombocytopenia) after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine.

It seems that patients who show these concomitant symptoms after the injection should be treated with other anticoagulants than the commonly used heparin, the Germans have discovered.


If it is true, what the German researchers believe, that the DIC reaction after A-Z vaccine is initiated due to massive pathological clotting of platelets, heparin would also be the wrong anticoagulant to give as it only acts on the humoral coagulation factors. And the detected thrombocytopenia in this form of DIC is probably due to increased consumption of these, and it even looks like heparin may aggravate the condition.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 21, 2021, 06:00:05 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 21, 2021, 05:41:42 AM
If it is true, what the German researchers believe, that the DIC reaction after A-Z vaccine is initiated due to massive pathological clotting of platelets, heparin would also be the wrong anticoagulant to give as it only acts on the humoral coagulation factors. And the detected thrombocytopenia in this form of DIC is probably due to increased consumption of these, and it even looks like heparin may aggravate the condition.

Well they ruled out Heparin, for it indeed aggravates the situation.


It seems that patients who show these concomitant symptoms after the injection should be treated with other anticoagulants than the commonly used heparin, the Germans have discovered.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 21, 2021, 08:21:20 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 20, 2021, 02:10:24 PM
Good news Karl!  Happy to hear that.

Thanks, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 22, 2021, 06:35:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 17, 2021, 03:16:27 PM
Interesting. According to the Berlingske newspaper, Danish professor Niels Høiby suggesting that the few cases of serious AZ problems may simply come from a failed technique during vaccination, resulting in the vaccine getting immediately into the blood, which it shouldn't - it's meant to go deep into the muscles, and the procedure should test the chosen spot, before the actual shot.

I read, that "Statens Seruminstitut" has changed their guidelines in the way that aspiration now is recommended before injection of vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 23, 2021, 05:20:41 AM
More opening up here in DK was announced today, but only slow and careful indeed. Restaurants will be allowed outdoor serving, and museums etc will open again, but only with the help of a 'Corona Pass' app, and only from April 21st, so in about a whole month from now ...

Statistics still good, though the R-number announced today was 1.1 - that is, a very slight increase. In neighbouring countries, there's a rise in infections, with close-downs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 23, 2021, 06:43:39 AM
(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7FEA/production/_117664723_optimised-vaccine_doses_per100_uk_us_eu_china_russia_22mar-nc-002.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 23, 2021, 07:02:58 AM
Quote from: Que on March 23, 2021, 06:43:39 AM
(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7FEA/production/_117664723_optimised-vaccine_doses_per100_uk_us_eu_china_russia_22mar-nc-002.png)

Quite Shocking to see the EU on 12.9 and the UK on 44.7 I wonder what would be the reason for this, dare I ask?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 23, 2021, 07:33:24 AM
A few days and Karl Henning gets his shot. Good stuff!  0:)

Quote from: "Harry" on March 23, 2021, 07:02:58 AM
Quite Shocking to see the EU on 12.9 and the UK on 44.7 I wonder what would be the reason for this, dare I ask?

The EU "bungled" this. Israel was willing to give the patient records to medical companies in exchange of sped-up vaccine deliveries. Some countries such as Chile pay extra for the vaccines. The EU gets TONS of vaccines. The problem is there are TONS of countries and people to vaccinate. Trump had operation Warpspeed, which not only allocated money into vaccine development (excluding Pfizer), but also into vaccine distribution and it shows. The problem in the US is after smart Americans have been vaccinated, the rest don't want microships injected into them...  :-\

Even if the EU look miserable compared to UK and US, we Europeans are privileged compared to many other parts in the World. Hardly anyone has been vaccinated in Africa for example. Looks like in Egypt only the elite has got their shots for example. EU's number is over double of that of the whole World and this is a global pandemic. We need group immunity EVERYWHERE. Anti-vaxxers alone make that a challenge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 08:16:28 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 23, 2021, 07:02:58 AM
Quite Shocking to see the EU on 12.9 and the UK on 44.7 I wonder what would be the reason for this, dare I ask?

I've read that it was due to being slow to acquire contracts and also significant supply disruptions.  And what it was not... it was not brexit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 23, 2021, 09:08:17 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 08:16:28 AM
I've read that it was due to being slow to acquire contracts and also significant supply disruptions.  And what it was not... it was not brexit.

Lets forget Brexit. Read an article in the current Sunday Times which did offer a new slant on the European take-up of the vaccine. Apparently natural medicine is a much bigger presence in France and Germany then the UK. Up to 50% of the population would refuse the vaccine against 20% in the UK. I do not know how true this is so don't shoot the messenger. But if true then a big worry.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 11:35:42 AM
A huge chunk of the US population would also refuse the vaccine.  I guess you're in the enlightened nation.  Bye bye herd immunity, guess we'll never get there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on March 23, 2021, 01:08:06 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 11:35:42 AM
A huge chunk of the US population would also refuse the vaccine.  I guess you're in the enlightened nation.  Bye bye herd immunity, guess we'll never get there.

Let's hope what people are telling pollsters is just "vice signalling", and they'll get vaccinated anyway when the opportunity arises.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 01:29:02 PM
I would hope so.  And I hope that those that think that the vaccine is not safe will see with the overwhelming number of people taking it with no significant side effects... that these vaccines are safe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 23, 2021, 01:35:50 PM
I and my wife got vaccinated by natural way --- ie, we had Covid-19.

All's well that ends well.

:D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 25, 2021, 12:51:41 AM
I'll be keen to know what people here who know the industry think of this account of vaccine distribution  and national interests.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveKeating/status/1372897651360940035
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 25, 2021, 12:50:11 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 23, 2021, 01:35:50 PM
I and my wife got vaccinated by natural way --- ie, we had Covid-19.

All's well that ends well.

:D

Are you better now? Hope so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2021, 01:29:12 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 25, 2021, 12:50:11 PM
Are you better now? Hope so.

Yes, we're fine, Jeffrey, thanks for asking. Completely healed apparently. Honestly and God be praised, we both had only mild symptoms --- and what is more, we didn't infect any of the people with whom we were in direct contact (of which my father and father-in-law were at high risk, both having serious comorbidities).

Btw, starting tomorrow Romania gets into a sort of lockdown, milder than the spring/summer of 2020 one but harsher than what we had since autumn 2020. The good news is that the movement between regions / cities / towns / villages is not completely restricted yet and I hope it never will be. (My in-laws live in a village 2-hr-drive away from Bucharest and their home-cum-garden is our weekly refuge far from the madding crowd of Bucharest.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on March 25, 2021, 01:49:51 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 25, 2021, 01:29:12 PM
Yes, we're fine, Jeffrey, thanks for asking. Completely healed apparently. Honestly and God be praised, we both had only mild symptoms --- and what is more, we didn't infect any of the people with whom we were in direct contact (of which my father and father-in-law were at high risk, both having serious comorbidities).

Glad to hear, Andrei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 25, 2021, 01:52:59 PM
Quote from: North Star on March 25, 2021, 01:49:51 PM
Glad to hear, Andrei.

Thanks, Karlo. Cheers and stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 26, 2021, 08:46:43 AM
Talked to two of my neighbors this morning, neither of whom intends to get vaccinated.  This, even though their leader Donald Trump (they rarely question him, saying he "displays good judgement") said, "I would recommend it."   :blank:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 26, 2021, 09:14:36 AM
I was informed this afternoon that my wife and myself get our first jab on the 5th of April.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 26, 2021, 10:01:03 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 26, 2021, 09:14:36 AM
I was informed this afternoon that my wife and myself get our first jab on the 5th of April.

Way to go, Harry; may your reactions be nil and your celebrations include the buying of at least a dozen more CDs...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 26, 2021, 10:26:11 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 26, 2021, 08:46:43 AM
Talked to two of my neighbors this morning, neither of whom intends to get vaccinated.  This, even though their leader Donald Trump (they rarely question him, saying he "displays good judgement") said, "I would recommend it."   :blank:

When Trump spent months downplaying the pandemic, he can't walk that back with one recommendation.  And radical right media have been playing up that vaccines are not safe.  What you end up with is a large group of people that won't wear masks, won't social distance and won't be vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on March 26, 2021, 10:34:36 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 26, 2021, 10:01:03 AM
Way to go, Harry; may your reactions be nil and your celebrations include the buying of at least a dozen more CDs...

Lol I will buy certainly at least a dozen CD'S😄😁😆
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 26, 2021, 11:04:19 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on March 26, 2021, 09:14:36 AM
I was informed this afternoon that my wife and myself get our first jab on the 5th of April.

That's good news Harry considering the frustratingly slow vaccination speed in Europe.
In Finland about 14 % of population has got their first jab and it looks like my turn won't come until June/July.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on March 26, 2021, 11:35:45 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 26, 2021, 10:26:11 AM
When Trump spent months downplaying the pandemic, he can't walk that back with one recommendation.  And radical right media have been playing up that vaccines are not safe.  What you end up with is a large group of people that won't wear masks, won't social distance and won't be vaccinated.

Correct, the neighbors in question are anti-vaxers and anti-maskers.  And anti-common sensers.  One of them has a mom, still kickin' at 93; her family refuses to wear masks around her.  "But you don't mind killing her?" is what I wanted to ask and didn't.  "We don't want to frighten her," is their rationalization.  My nextdoor neighbor has repeat nightmares about Antifa and BLM marching down our suburban street, raping and pillaging and "taking over our homes," that's how effective the right's propaganda is.  She makes me nervous as her house is just bristling with weaponry of all kinds.  Guns and God:  goes to church on Sunday, often twice, "for extra salvation," an interesting, if questionable theological concept.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 26, 2021, 02:22:38 PM
Whatever became of that huge stockpile of Hydrochloroquine?

And why has an investigation not been opened?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 26, 2021, 11:19:50 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 26, 2021, 11:04:19 AM
That's good news Harry considering the frustratingly slow vaccination speed in Europe.
In Finland about 14 % of population has got their first jab and it looks like my turn won't come until June/July.  :P

The ever-changing vaccine news are quite stressful; we literally hear of huge delays and then big improvements, repeatedly, from day to day. I think this applies to most EU countries. The story goes that AZ has delivered 100 mio doses less than promised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 27, 2021, 01:15:59 PM
Progress for some countries, at least.  A good number of European countries appear to have dangerously incompetent public health officials at the helm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 28, 2021, 01:32:39 PM
Biden, companies working to develop 'vaccine passports.' It won't be easy (https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2021-03-28/biden-companies-working-to-develop-vaccine-passports-it-wont-be-easy)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 28, 2021, 01:42:21 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 28, 2021, 01:32:39 PM
Biden, companies working to develop 'vaccine passports.' It won't be easy (https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2021-03-28/biden-companies-working-to-develop-vaccine-passports-it-wont-be-easy)

Not happy with this smartphone approach.  Contrary to popular belief not everyone uses them.  Just the strange hurdle of government agencies only communicating online and chains like CVS making vaccine appointments only available online has cut off many people.

A large fraction of people don't even use mobile tickets at airports for crying out loud.  I'm not a luddite but I know people that are.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 28, 2021, 01:43:41 PM
Anyway I need to get my second shot on Thursday.  I can't make an appointment until Wednesday.  And right when I need to get my shot phase 2 begins (they moved it up by an entire month).  I'm wondering how hard it will be to get that shot.  I guess I'll have to find out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 28, 2021, 02:16:22 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 28, 2021, 01:42:21 PM
Not happy with this smartphone approach.  Contrary to popular belief not everyone uses them.

Yes, I don't use smartphone. I find the finger touch screen tricky and the screen is too small for comfort.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 28, 2021, 03:16:47 PM
My wife and I received out second Physer shots Friday.  No side effects from either one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 28, 2021, 03:38:41 PM
Quote from: arpeggio on March 28, 2021, 03:16:47 PM
My wife and I received out second Physer shots Friday.  No side effects from either one.

Pfizer? ;D Anyway, that's awesome!  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on March 28, 2021, 04:56:11 PM
^^^^
Sometimes I am too lazy to look things up  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 03:53:29 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 28, 2021, 01:43:41 PM
Anyway I need to get my second shot on Thursday.  I can't make an appointment until Wednesday.  And right when I need to get my shot phase 2 begins (they moved it up by an entire month).  I'm wondering how hard it will be to get that shot.  I guess I'll have to find out.
That's interesting.  I wonder why they are delaying things for so long in your area?  Not enough vaccine coming through?  It seems that it would be a nightmare to schedule!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 29, 2021, 04:19:13 AM
As of today this pandemic has caused 822 deaths in Finland. In the last two weeks there has been 22 new deaths meaning 1.6 deaths/day in average. The first corona-related death in Finland happened March 20, 2020. So, 822 deaths in 374 days = 2.2 deaths/day. We had the most deaths per day in April last year when the pandemic ran wildly in retirement homes killing the weakest elders, but then safety measures got better and also the treatment of corona patients has gotten better. This year the virus variants have made the situation worse, but on the other hand the vaccinations of older people have reduced deaths among them. There are 54 corona-patients in hospitals receiving intensive care. At the moment the healthcare system can handle this, but if the amount on patients increases the system is tested.

As of today 15.2 % of Finns have gotten the first round of vaccine. The threshold of herd immunity is estimated to be 70 %. At this speed it is reached October 5th, but the amount of vaccines coming into the country should increase so hopefully this 70 % threshold will be reached much sooner.

Quote from: arpeggio on March 28, 2021, 04:56:11 PM
^^^^
Sometimes I am too lazy to look things up  :D

I find the name so cool I remember it easily.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 04:45:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 03:53:29 AM
That's interesting.  I wonder why they are delaying things for so long in your area?  Not enough vaccine coming through?  It seems that it would be a nightmare to schedule!

PD

Delaying things?  It is the opposite, they keep up moving up the time table.  I have a friend that lives in a state that is still in 1A.  That's delaying things!  When I saw the map recently on the NYTimes it looks like my state is pretty much in the middle with several states way ahead and several far behind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 29, 2021, 06:45:37 AM
A landmark for London - yesterday zero deaths recorded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 29, 2021, 06:50:29 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 29, 2021, 06:45:37 AM
A landmark for London - yesterday zero deaths recorded.

This could be just a delay in reporting, but wow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 08:28:09 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 04:45:56 AM
Delaying things?  It is the opposite, they keep up moving up the time table.  I have a friend that lives in a state that is still in 1A.  That's delaying things!  When I saw the map recently on the NYTimes it looks like my state is pretty much in the middle with several states way ahead and several far behind.
Sorry, I believe that you misunderstood me.  What I had meant/was wondering about was why they were waiting until the day before to schedule your second shot?  In my area, you schedule your first and second shots at the same time.  It seems that it would be rather chaotic to try and schedule *everyone at your place the day before they are due to get their second shot.  I realize that there is a bit of a longer window of time to get your second one than I had initially heard--there is the difference though in terms of optimal time to get it from what I understand anyway.

*and the chance that not everyone might be able to get through (jammed phone lines).  Or do they call you?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 09:15:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 08:28:09 AM
Sorry, I believe that you misunderstood me.  What I had meant/was wondering about was why they were waiting until the day before to schedule your second shot?  In my area, you schedule your first and second shots at the same time.  It seems that it would be rather chaotic to try and schedule *everyone at your place the day before they are due to get their second shot.  I realize that there is a bit of a longer window of time to get your second one than I had initially heard--there is the difference though in terms of optimal time to get it from what I understand anyway.

*and the chance that not everyone might be able to get through (jammed phone lines).  Or do they call you?

PD

Oh I see.  Some of my colleagues did get both scheduled at the same time.  But I jumped the line by getting a walk-in from a pharmacy that allowed it so I didn't get that second appointment set up.  I agree that it doesn't make sense for these pharmacies to only allow you to make the appointment the day before.  It is dumb.  But so is not allowing people to just call in and schedule it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 29, 2021, 09:18:49 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 29, 2021, 06:45:37 AM
A landmark for London - yesterday zero deaths recorded.

Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 29, 2021, 09:21:08 AM
Quote from: arpeggio on March 28, 2021, 03:16:47 PM
My wife and I received out second Physer shots Friday.  No side effects from either one.

Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 29, 2021, 09:25:21 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 28, 2021, 01:42:21 PM
Not happy with this smartphone approach.  Contrary to popular belief not everyone uses them.  Just the strange hurdle of government agencies only communicating online and chains like CVS making vaccine appointments only available online has cut off many people.

A large fraction of people don't even use mobile tickets at airports for crying out loud.  I'm not a luddite but I know people that are.

I agree. Anything governmental that assumes that all citizens concerned use a smartphone is ill-advised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 09:39:54 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 09:15:03 AM
Oh I see.  Some of my colleagues did get both scheduled at the same time.  But I jumped the line by getting a walk-in from a pharmacy that allowed it so I didn't get that second appointment set up.  I agree that it doesn't make sense for these pharmacies to only allow you to make the appointment the day before.  It is dumb.  But so is not allowing people to just call in and schedule it.
You would think that there would have been some sort of computer system set up (laptops) at the pharmacy so that they could schedule the second shot effectively (and without double-booking)?  In any event, hope that all goes smoothly for you Wednesday and Thursday.

PD
Quote from: Irons on March 29, 2021, 06:45:37 AM
A landmark for London - yesterday zero deaths recorded.
Excellent Irons!  May it continue!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 09:48:55 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 29, 2021, 09:39:54 AM
You would think that there would have been some sort of computer system set up (laptops) at the pharmacy so that they could schedule the second shot effectively (and without double-booking)?  In any event, hope that all goes smoothly for you Wednesday and Thursday.

See talking about it got me more proactive.  I ended up talking to someone that works the covid hotline and CVS.  And they couldn't get me an appointment despite appointments being available.  So I called the pharmacy where I got my first jab directly and they said it was fine for me to walk in again.  Sigh of relief.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 29, 2021, 10:06:10 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 09:48:55 AM
See talking about it got me more proactive.  I ended up talking to someone that works the covid hotline and CVS.  And they couldn't get me an appointment despite appointments being available.  So I called the pharmacy where I got my first jab directly and they said it was fine for me to walk in again.  Sigh of relief.

Good job!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 30, 2021, 04:56:48 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 29, 2021, 09:48:55 AM
See talking about it got me more proactive.  I ended up talking to someone that works the covid hotline and CVS.  And they couldn't get me an appointment despite appointments being available.  So I called the pharmacy where I got my first jab directly and they said it was fine for me to walk in again.  Sigh of relief.
Yay!  ;D  Happy for you!  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on March 31, 2021, 07:05:15 AM
I don't know if worldwide but there is a reluctance, a lack of trust, of the black community in the UK to be vaccinated. Something I admit not understanding not least because for many reasons they are most at risk. This is seen as a threat to the successful beating of Covid so possibly the most famous black man in the entertainment industry here, Sir Lenny Henry, has put a short video together with his mates to be shown on national TV. Lenny Henry is a funny guy and the last line did make me laugh.

  https://youtu.be/qb_7IkDnulo
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 31, 2021, 07:16:29 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 29, 2021, 10:06:10 AM
Good job!

Or good jab!

TD:
I got my second Pfizer jab to day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 31, 2021, 12:53:50 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 31, 2021, 07:16:29 AM
Or good jab!

TD:
I got my second Pfizer jab to day.

Superb!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 01, 2021, 05:49:14 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 23, 2021, 01:29:02 PM
I would hope so.  And I hope that those that think that the vaccine is not safe will see with the overwhelming number of people taking it with no significant side effects... that these vaccines are safe.

btw the other day I read an article in the WSJ which points to the general populace being much more willing to be vaccinated now than in January.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 05:56:27 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 01, 2021, 05:49:14 AM
btw the other day I read an article in the WSJ which points to the general populace being much more willing to be vaccinated now than in January.

An acquaintance of mine told me recently: I'd take even the Sputnik or Sinovac vaccine, I don't care, I just want to be able to travel as soon as possible.  :)

BTW, what's the level of Covid and Covid-vaccines conspiracy theory in your countries, ladies and gentlemen? Unfortunately, in Romania it's rather high and although the restrictions are among the least draconian in the whole Europe, protests take place every night, chanting "Freedom! Freedom!". Just the other night, one of the leaders of the protests was asked by a clever lady journalist live on TV: "okay, let's suppose that the Romanian government tell Romanian citizens they are free to go wherever they want without any restriction whatsoever; where would you go actually, as all countries in Europe ask either for vaccine, or for negative PCR test, or for antibodies test, or will simply quarantine you for two weeks on your own expenses?" The guy answered without as much as teh blinking of an eye: "It doesn't matter we can't go in practice, all that matters is that we could go in theory." The same lady asked a MP from a nationalist party: "Are you going to tell me that all the governments have gone mad inventing this pandemia, that thw whole world has gone mad?" and the guy replied "That's exactly what I claim!" to which she said "Yeah, right, the whole world has gone mad, only you (plural implying their whole bunch) have kept your sanity!" Well done, Marinela, brava! (that''s her first name).

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 01, 2021, 07:25:03 AM
Quote from: Irons on March 31, 2021, 07:05:15 AM
I don't know if worldwide but there is a reluctance, a lack of trust, of the black community in the UK to be vaccinated. Something I admit not understanding not least because for many reasons they are most at risk. This is seen as a threat to the successful beating of Covid so possibly the most famous black man in the entertainment industry here, Sir Lenny Henry, has put a short video together with his mates to be shown on national TV. Lenny Henry is a funny guy and the last line did make me laugh.

  https://youtu.be/qb_7IkDnulo

There is genuine reluctance from the Black community among others. Last week a highly respected doctor of haitian origin received her shot publicly (local journalists and cameras) to show her community it is safe to get it. She specifically referred to past episodes of medical racism such as the Tuskegee experiments to explain why Blacks harbour doubts and misconceptions over vaccines.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-some-black-and-latinx-people-are-reluctant-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine#From-Tuskegee-to-now:-A-complex-history-of-medical-racism (https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-some-black-and-latinx-people-are-reluctant-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine#From-Tuskegee-to-now:-A-complex-history-of-medical-racism)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 07:35:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 23, 2021, 01:35:50 PM
I and my wife got vaccinated by natural way --- ie, we had Covid-19.

All's well that ends well.

:D

According to the general recommendations you do well to get a vaccine too, even if you have had COVID 19, because the vaccines induce a better and maybe also longer lasting immune response than the disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:39:17 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 07:35:14 AM
According to the general recommendations you do well to get a vaccine too, even if you have had COVID 19, because the vaccines induce a better and maybe also longer lasting immune response than the disease.

AFAIK, we must wait 3 months after recovery before getting a vaccine. Is this correct or just rumour?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on April 01, 2021, 07:45:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:39:17 AM
AFAIK, we must wait 3 months after recovery before getting a vaccine. Is this correct or just rumour?

This is from the CDC website -

'If you were treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma, you should wait 90 days before getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Talk to your doctor if you are unsure what treatments you received or if you have more questions about getting a COVID-19 vaccine'

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 07:48:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:39:17 AM
AFAIK, we must wait 3 months after recovery before getting a vaccine. Is this correct or just rumour?

In our country at least four weeks should pass after recovery. I do not know what other countries do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 07:49:48 AM
Quote from: Biffo on April 01, 2021, 07:45:51 AM
This is from the CDC website -

'If you were treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma, you should wait 90 days before getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Talk to your doctor if you are unsure what treatments you received or if you have more questions about getting a COVID-19 vaccine'

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html

Yes, but Andrei didn't get any treatment of that kind, so this doesn't apply to him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 01, 2021, 07:50:45 AM
Quote from: André on April 01, 2021, 07:25:03 AM
There is genuine reluctance from the Black community among others. Last week a highly respected doctor of haitian origin received her shot publicly (local journalists and cameras) to show her community it is safe to get it. She specifically referred to past episodes of medical racism such as the Tuskegee experiments to explain why Blacks harbour doubts and misconceptions over vaccines.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-some-black-and-latinx-people-are-reluctant-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine#From-Tuskegee-to-now:-A-complex-history-of-medical-racism (https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-some-black-and-latinx-people-are-reluctant-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine#From-Tuskegee-to-now:-A-complex-history-of-medical-racism)

Interesting. I realise racism takes many forms but medical racism is a new one for me. I would like to think we are all in it together.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 01, 2021, 07:51:32 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:39:17 AM
AFAIK, we must wait 3 months after recovery before getting a vaccine. Is this correct or just rumour?

You may be right. My sister had an infusion of antibodies, and she must wait 90 days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:51:50 AM
Quote from: Biffo on April 01, 2021, 07:45:51 AM
This is from the CDC website -

'If you were treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma, you should wait 90 days before getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Talk to your doctor if you are unsure what treatments you received or if you have more questions about getting a COVID-19 vaccine'

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html

Thanks.

I took Ibuprofen (only if feverish) and for five days an antibiotics (one per day) whose name I can't remember otoh. That was all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on April 01, 2021, 07:52:58 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 07:49:48 AM
Yes, but Andrei didn't get any treatment of that kind, so this doesn't apply to him.

OK, I suppose he should still see a doctor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:59:24 AM
I'm not a physician but my impression is that if you got the disease proper and recovered quickly without any grave symptoms, you would/could develop a better, and possibly longer, antibodies defense than what you'd got from a vaccine (ie, a "tamed" version of this effing bloody virus). I might be wrong though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:03:04 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 01, 2021, 07:50:45 AM
medical racism is a new one for me.

Eugenics is older than a century.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 01, 2021, 08:07:54 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 07:35:14 AM
According to the general recommendations you do well to get a vaccine too, even if you have had COVID 19, because the vaccines induce a better and maybe also longer lasting immune response than the disease.

The general rule is 90 days between the Covid infection, and getting a vaccin.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 08:15:26 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 07:59:24 AM
I'm not a physician but my impression is that if you got the disease proper and recovered quickly without any grave symptoms, you would/could develop a better, and possibly longer, antibodies defense than what you'd got from a vaccine (ie, a "tamed" version of this effing bloody virus). I might be wrong though.

You are wrong. As I wrote above: The disease evokes a weaker immune response than the vaccines. When the disease runs a mild course the immune response is moreover weaker than when the disease runs a more grave course. The duration of relative immunity after infection is said to be at least 6 months, and somewhat longer (the last I read was two years - I wonder how one can say that) after vaccination.

And the immunity after the disease or vaccination is always relative. It doesn't ensure that you don't get infected again (even with the same strain of virus), but it gives a reasonable probability, that the disease the second time runs a milder course, even if you also will be contagious again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 08:17:59 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 01, 2021, 08:07:54 AM
The general rule is 90 days between the Covid infection, and getting a vaccin.

Not in my country, as I wrote above. Here the authorities say at least four weeks, if you didn't get any specific treatement against the Covid19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:41:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 08:15:26 AM
The disease evokes a weaker immune response than the vaccines.

Why?

Look, I'm not a virologist, I'm an engineer. By engineering logic, it jiust doesn't look right to me that something which is naturally genuine and wild evokes a weaker response than something which is laboratory manipulated and tamed.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:49:06 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 08:15:26 AM
the immunity after the disease or vaccination is always relative. It doesn't ensure that you don't get infected again (even with the same strain of virus), but it gives a reasonable probability, that the disease the second time runs a milder course, even if you also will be contagious again.

But, but, but --- if after vaccination you will possibly be contagious again, then why the upcoming discrimination between vaccinated and non-vaccinated people?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 09:07:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:41:55 AM
Why?

Look, I'm not a virologist, I'm an engineer. By engineering logic, it jiust doesn't look right to me that something which is naturally genuine and wild evokes a weaker response than something which is laboratory manipulated and tamed.

Because the virologists have become so clever and the technical measures have become so refined, that it is possible construct vaccines which surpass the nature.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:18:49 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 09:07:45 AM
Because the virologists have become so clever and the technical measures have become so refined, that it is possible construct vaccines which surpass the nature.

Maybe. Then again, maybe not. I reserve judgement until definitive, irrefutable proof --- ie, ad calendas graecas..

Meanwhile let me just say this: if I'm not mistaken, 30 million people in the UK have been vaccinated with AstraZeneca. If the conspiracy theory were right, then we should have witnessed tens of thousands of deaths because of it --- which is very far from being the case. I believe the whole AZ kerfurffle is commercially and politically motivated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 09:21:09 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:49:06 AM
But, but, but --- if after vaccination you will possibly be contagious again, then why the upcoming discrimination between vaccinated and non-vaccinated people?

I believe that this is somehow politically motivated with the conscious or unconscious purpose of motivating all adults to be vaccinated, which is also what benefits public health best and provides the best opportunity to reopen society as much as possible. But the idea of a corona passport is questionable, as the passport can never provide full assurance that the person in question is not infected, but only a greater probability that he is not infected. There will still be some people with corona passports who are infected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 09:28:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:18:49 AM
Maybe. Then again, maybe not. I reserve judgement until definitive, irrefutable proof --- ie, ad calendas graecas..

Meanwhile let me just say this: if I'm not mistaken, 30 million people in the UK have been vaccinated with AstraZeneca. If the conspiracy theory were right, then we should have witnessed tens of thousands of deaths because of it --- which is very far from being the case. I believe the whole AZ kerfurffle is commercially and politically motivated.

The serious side effects after the A-Z vaccine are very rare, but obviously affect much younger people whose risk of dying from Covid 19 is relatively small. So maybe younger people should have another vaccine. On the other hand, it is stated that the degree of protection of this vaccine is less than that of the other vaccines, so perhaps older vulnerable individuals should not have it either. And who is then left to get it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:28:39 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 09:21:09 AM
the idea of a corona passport is questionable, as the passport can never provide full assurance that the person in question is not infected, but only a greater probability that he is not infected. There will still be some people with corona passports who are infected.

And there will still be people without corona passports who are not infected.

The issue is a whole can of worms. Bottom line, I'm in favor of a "passport" with three options: vaccine, positive antibodies test, PCR negative test. Desperate measures for desperate times.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:33:44 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 09:28:07 AM
it is stated that the degree of protection of this vaccine is less than that of the other vaccines

Stated by which internationally certified and acknowledged scientific organization?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 09:46:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:33:44 AM
Stated by which internationally certified and acknowledged scientific organization?

Stated by the producers of the vaccines, who are supposed to know the most about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:55:47 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 09:46:45 AM
Stated by the producers of the vaccines, who are supposed to know the most about it.

Have the producers of AstraZeneca publicly stated that their vaccine is less effective than other similar vaccines? Has the EMA stated it?

Bottom line: do you imply that those who took AZ are less immune and more endangered than those who took Pfizer or Moderna?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 10:14:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 09:55:47 AM
Have the producers of AstraZeneca publicly stated that their vaccine is less effective than other similar vaccines?

The result of the A-Z phase III test was published in the Lancet:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext

The preliminary conclusion was a degree of protection lower (70% overall) than the published degree of protection from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Preliminary because further studies must be made with all vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 10:20:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 10:14:48 AM
The result of the A-Z phase III test was published in the Lancet:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext

The preliminary conclusion was a degree of protection lower (70% overall) than the published degree of protection from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Preliminary because further studies must be made with all vaccines.

A-hah!

IMHO, the whole AZ kerfuffle is politically and commercially motivated: the UK and Sweden are the two European countries taking the most unorthodox approach to the Covid pandemics and the AZ vaccine is the cheapest EMA approved vaccine.

Bottom line: would you take the AZ vaccine?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 10:33:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 10:20:55 AM
Bottom line: would you take the AZ vaccine?

No, I am >70 and particularly at risk to get serious course of Covid19 because of other disease. For that reason I needed to get a RNA-vaccine (Pfizer/Moderna) which other than an antibody response (B-cells) also evokes a significant T-cell response. Fortunately the vaccine policy of my country took this into consideration.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 10:41:47 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 10:33:48 AM
No, I am >70 and particularly at risk to get serious course of Covid19 because of other disease. For that reason I needed to get a RNA-vaccine (Pfizer/Moderna) which other than an antibody response (B-cells) also evokes a significant T-cell response. Fortunately the vaccine policy of my country took this into consideration.

So what you say is basically that both the producers of AZ and the EMA are untrustworthy sources, and that the AZ vaccine cause serious, if not lethal, troubles.

Exactly, and point by point, what Romanian conspiracy theorists claim.

If I misunderstood you, I apologize. Please clarify.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 01, 2021, 11:06:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 10:41:47 AM
So what you say is basically that both the producers of AZ and the EMA are untrustworthy sources, and that the AZ vaccine cause serious, if not lethal, troubles.

Exactly, and point by point, what Romanian conspiracy theorists claim.

If I misunderstood you, I apologize. Please clarify.

I don't understand how you came to that conclusion. I wrote above about my own situation and my own need for protection, seen from a medical point of view. This has nothing with politics or conspiration theories to do. I don't think I would be particularly at risk of serious complications (which are very rare and mostly affects younger individuals) from the A-Z vaccine, but the vaccines act differently and the A-Z vaccine doesn't fill my need for protection from a medical point of view. Given my preexisting disease the A-Z vaccine is supposed to give me as well as no protection at all. So it would be waste to give me that vaccine. Read my post above once more - or twice if you still don't get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 01, 2021, 02:41:59 PM
If you've had COVID then surely the T cells in your body were activated - yes?

I've always wondered about levels of immunity to various viruses being a result of the severity of the infection. When I was 23 I got a dose of the flu that came close to hospitalising me. (I probably should have been). Since then I have never had the flu (and rarely get colds) and I attribute it to the fact that the this bout of the flu was so strong it produced an extreme reaction from my immune system that has lasted 56 years.

One thing that we need to focus on with the vaccination program is that while it will not necessarily prevent reinfection, it will lessen the severity of the infection, basically turning COVID into a milder virus and significantly reducing the possibility of death. In other words we will go from pandemic to endemic. This should happen in many parts of the world this year. A yearly COVID vaccination booster might also be part of the scenario, similar to the yearly flu shots now available.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 01, 2021, 02:56:30 PM
Quote from: Holden on April 01, 2021, 02:41:59 PM
If you've had COVID then surely the T cells in your body were activated - yes?

I've always wondered about levels of immunity to various viruses being a result of the severity of the infection. When I was 23 I got a dose of the flu that came close to hospitalising me. (I probably should have been). Since then I have never had the flu (and rarely get colds) and I attribute it to the fact that the this bout of the flu was so strong it produced an extreme reaction from my immune system that has lasted 56 years.

One thing that we need to focus on with the vaccination program is that while it will not necessarily prevent reinfection, it will lessen the severity of the infection, basically turning COVID into a milder virus and significantly reducing the possibility of death. In other words we will go from pandemic to endemic. This should happen in many parts of the world this year. A yearly COVID vaccination booster might also be part of the scenario, similar to the yearly flu shots now available.

I agree, that should be the effect of the vaccine. Whenever one catches it, its deleterious effects will have been neutralized. I'm getting the shot tomorrow morning. Hopefully my immune system won't react as wildly as yours !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 01, 2021, 07:51:40 PM
Quote from: Florestan on April 01, 2021, 08:41:55 AM
Why?

Look, I'm not a virologist, I'm an engineer. By engineering logic, it jiust doesn't look right to me that something which is naturally genuine and wild evokes a weaker response than something which is laboratory manipulated and tamed.

I think that this line of thinking implicitly assumes that the vaccines are traditional vaccines.  But the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not weaker forms of the virus or inert at all.  They are messenger RNA.  Whatever intuitive understanding of how vaccines work is out the door in our modern age.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 01, 2021, 07:52:07 PM
Oh and I got my second dose!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 01, 2021, 08:22:16 PM
Quote from: DavidW on April 01, 2021, 07:52:07 PM
Oh and I got my second dose!

Sweet!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 01, 2021, 11:58:21 PM
Is Britain sleepwalking into a highly controlled society, with Covid passports the thin end of the wedge?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/apr/02/senior-tories-join-jeremy-corbyn-to-oppose-covid-passports-ahead-of-trials

Little by little we sacrifice liberty for security, until we end up with an authoritarian society à la Communist Europe after the war. This, I believe, is the great political danger of the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 02, 2021, 01:12:33 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 01, 2021, 11:06:58 AM
I don't understand how you came to that conclusion. I wrote above about my own situation and my own need for protection, seen from a medical point of view. This has nothing with politics or conspiration theories to do. I don't think I would be particularly at risk of serious complications (which are very rare and mostly affects younger individuals) from the A-Z vaccine, but the vaccines act differently and the A-Z vaccine doesn't fill my need for protection from a medical point of view. Given my preexisting disease the A-Z vaccine is supposed to give me as well as no protection at all. So it would be waste to give me that vaccine. Read my post above once more - or twice if you still don't get it.

Got it now, thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 02:51:11 AM
Quote from: Holden on April 01, 2021, 02:41:59 PM
If you've had COVID then surely the T cells in your body were activated - yes?

Yes, but apparently not enough T-cell reaction to create much immunity.

Quote from: Holden
I've always wondered about levels of immunity to various viruses being a result of the severity of the infection. When I was 23 I got a dose of the flu that came close to hospitalising me. (I probably should have been). Since then I have never had the flu (and rarely get colds) and I attribute it to the fact that the this bout of the flu was so strong it produced an extreme reaction from my immune system that has lasted 56 years.

No influenza vaccine have so far been made, which protects against all varieties of influenza vira and varieties to come, and given the fact that influenza vira mutate frequently, your argument doesn't hold true.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 03:00:14 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 01, 2021, 11:58:21 PM
Is Britain sleepwalking into a highly controlled society, with Covid passports the thin end of the wedge?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/apr/02/senior-tories-join-jeremy-corbyn-to-oppose-covid-passports-ahead-of-trials


Yes, good arguments, and also given the fact, that a corona passport only provides a false safety, we have every reason to be opposed to its introduction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 03:17:43 AM
A pass will certainly minimize risks in the spaces where it's required, no matter what, so that's one reason not to be against it ...

Among the precautions for making the pass more reliable, having already had Covid - with the assumption that some immunity has been gained - will only qualify for 12 weeks in the pass, here in DK.

Other qualifiers will of course be vaccines, or a recent test.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 04:35:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 03:17:43 AM
A pass will certainly minimize risks in the spaces where it's required, no matter what, so that's one reason not to be against it ...

Among the precautions for making the pass more reliable, having already had Covid - with the assumption that some immunity has been gained - will only qualify for 12 weeks in the pass, here in DK.

Other qualifiers will of course be vaccines, or a recent test.

What risks? The risk of being infected or the risk of infecting others?

Even if you are vaccinated you may all the same contract covid19 and infect others. And vaccinated individuals are supposed to exert a more risky behavior, making their chance of becoming infected higher.

So a corona passport isn't going to minimize the risk of infecting others sufficiently to ensure that vulnerable individuals (in principle all >50 years of age) aren't infected. And the only way to minimize the risk of getting seriously ill if you contract the disease, is to become vaccinated yourself. And you don't need a passport for that.

If you you have a negative test you may still infect others if you are infected yourself (false negative quick tests).

If you have a recent positive antibodies test it is presumed that you are not reinfected yet, so this may be the best test for corona passports. But the antibodies disappear with time - sometimes rather fast, so this test can't always be used.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
Reports are that vaccines reduce the risks of infecting others, it was reported even today as well. Needs further studies, but maybe up to 90%.

Tests can be inaccurate, but they are mostly correct, PCRs up to 95%.

So even if there's still a risk, it is significantly lowered. That's the whole point.

Besides, due to work, I've had to use public transport for 3 days with half a dozen of daily hours in metropolitan trains etc., and it was very umpleasant how corona fatigue and lack of control have made an increasing number of people irresponsible or downright provocative, say as regards wearing masks, keeping distance, approaching people and shouting etc. I did not feel safe. As a result, I've had to order another PCR, my 6th, on Sunday. With a lower infection rate due to the pass in certain public spaces, even such behaviour there would pose less of a risk.

Like it's been the case, I won't be taking public transport unless absolutely necessary, but with a pass, I'd be able to do some cultural activities, eating out, tourist accommodation and possibly travels abroad etc., in a safer environment. Obviously, also safer for people working there, if places are allowed/supposed to open to the public.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 02, 2021, 05:21:44 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 04:35:16 AM
What risks? The risk of being infected or the risk of infecting others?

Mainly the risk of being infected because you know others around are vaccinated.

Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 04:35:16 AMEven if you are vaccinated you may all the same contract covid19 and infect others. And vaccinated individuals are supposed to exert a more risky behavior, making their chance of becoming infected higher.

It looks like the risk for vaccinated people infecting others is much lower. So we CAN take the risk and OPEN the damn society again! What's the point of getting vaccinated if the society can't be opened? We can't live like this forever. This damn pandemic has already lasted for too long.

Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 04:35:16 AMSo a corona passport isn't going to minimize the risk of infecting others sufficiently to ensure that vulnerable individuals (in principle all >50 years of age) aren't infected. And the only way to minimize the risk of getting seriously ill if you contract the disease, is to become vaccinated yourself. And you don't need a passport for that.

It is enough if we get the infection levels down so that the epidemic dies away. The World is not 100 % safe. You can get hit by a car or something. At some point the risks are low enough for the society to open and passports help in that.

Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 04:35:16 AMIf you you have a negative test you may still infect others if you are infected yourself (false negative quick tests).
Yes but probability is low. There will always be risks and danger even long after corona. The key is to keep those risks low.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 07:19:35 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
Reports are that vaccines reduce the risks of infecting others, it was reported even today as well. Needs further studies, but maybe up to 90%.
This is much disputed by the experts. The present "evidence" is not sufficiently convincing.

Quote from: MusicTurner
Tests can be inaccurate, but they are mostly correct, PCRs up to 95%.
But it hasn't been mentioned that a corona passport specifically presupposes a PCR test, and besides it takes at least 24 hours (sometimes more) to get the answer, which makes the practical use of it more inconveinent.

Quote from: MusicTurner
So even if there's still a risk, it is significantly lowered. That's the whole point.
My point is, that the risk still is too large, particularly for people at risk not only to acquiring covid19 but also prone to a serious course if infected (I  am one of those persons).

Quote from: MusicTurner
.... I won't be taking public transport unless absolutely necessary, but with a pass, I'd be able to do some cultural activities, eating out, tourist accommodation and possibly travels abroad etc., ...
Your corona passport doesn't protect yourself as such against covid19, only if you got it because you were vaccinated, not if you just got a test. The decisive factor  is, that all your possible contacts have got a corona passport. In the same way as it is true for face masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 07:19:35 AM
(...)
Your corona passport doesn't protect yourself as such against covid19, only if you got it because you were vaccinated, not if you just got a test. The decisive factor  is, that all your possible contacts have got a corona passport. In the same way as it is true for face masks.

Of course, we agree on that. And an environment where they all have it will give positive effect.

Btw, my doctor and hospital require testing before visiting them too. I understand that the situation can be different in the provinces regarding doctors, but I'm glad it's the case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 07:35:13 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
Reports are that vaccines reduce the risks of infecting others, it was reported even today as well. Needs further studies, but maybe up to 90%.

That is not really the truth.  The clinical trials didn't assess that.  There is not evidence at this point, so even fully vaccinated people should still wear masks.  More research needs to be made.  See here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html)

I think Walensky by now has probably learned the danger of quoting statistics out of context on public channels.  And this time it is very dangerous because if people stop wearing masks things can go south very quickly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 07:36:46 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 07:35:13 AM
That is not really the truth.  The clinical trials didn't assess that.  There is not evidence at this point, so even fully vaccinated people should still wear masks.  More research needs to be made.  See here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html)

I think Walensky by now has probably learned the danger of quoting statistics out of context on public channels.  And this time it is very dangerous because if people stop wearing masks things can go south very quickly.

I'm pro masks, of course, also after vaccines, until the pressure is off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 07:43:06 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 02, 2021, 05:21:44 AM
Mainly the risk of being infected because you know others around are vaccinated.

It looks like the risk for vaccinated people infecting others is much lower. So we CAN take the risk and OPEN the damn society again! What's the point of getting vaccinated if the society can't be opened? We can't live like this forever. This damn pandemic has already lasted for too long.

It is enough if we get the infection levels down so that the epidemic dies away. The World is not 100 % safe. You can get hit by a car or something. At some point the risks are low enough for the society to open and passports help in that.
Yes but probability is low. There will always be risks and danger even long after corona. The key is to keep those risks low.

I agree with most of this  above, but my starting point for this discussion was the question of the need to introduce a corona passport. I think the passport still provides a false sense of security, especially for the particularly vulnerable like me. The crucial things will for a long time to come still be distance and hand hygiene and so on, and one can fear that the passport will make people who think they are not at risk relax on these precautions. which is a paradox, because with these precautions we first and foremost protect the others and in return expect the others to protect us by the same precautions. 


Finally, I believe that the corona passport will lead to unwanted forms of discrimination in society
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 07:45:55 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 07:36:46 AM
I'm pro masks, of course, also after vaccines, until the pressure is off.

Oh I didn't assume you had an agenda.  My main concern is that people feeling safe (and not even from Walensky) 2 weeks after the last shot will just wearing masks, and then people with covid fatigue will also follow suit before they are even fully vaccinated and next thing we know the pandemic is raging out of control again.  And I'm saying this because I am feeling the fatigue.  Everyone wants to return back to normal now.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 07:47:57 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 07:35:13 AM
That is not really the truth.  The clinical trials didn't assess that.  There is not evidence at this point, so even fully vaccinated people should still wear masks.  More research needs to be made.  See here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/health/coronavirus-vaccine-walensky.html)

I think Walensky by now has probably learned the danger of quoting statistics out of context on public channels.  And this time it is very dangerous because if people stop wearing masks things can go south very quickly.

There is evidence, but it's being disagreed upon how final it is. There are other sources finding it likely convincing. Of course, authorities don't want people to become too relaxed in their attitude. We'll see more results in the coming months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 07:58:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Of course, we agree on that. And an environment where they all have it will give positive effect.
But so far you can get a corona passport just after a quick test - and as far as I understand this will be the case (hope I am wrong) - there will be an infinitesimally small positive effect.

Quote from: MusicTurner
Btw, my doctor and hospital require testing before visiting them too. I understand that the situation can be different in the provinces regarding doctors, but I'm glad it's the case.
This is the case (PCR test) at many hospitals in the province. But then discrimination already shows up. Because the patient has no right to see if the staff has been tested and when. Also in small shops e.g. hairdressers, which are to open soon. The hairdresser may demand a fresh test from the costumer, but what about the hairdresser's test?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 08:11:24 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 02, 2021, 07:58:28 AM
But so far you can get a corona passport just after a quick test - and as far as I understand this will be the case (hope I am wrong) - there will be an infinitesimally small positive effect.
This is the case (PCR test) at many hospitals in the province. But then discrimination already shows up. Because the patient has no right to see if the staff has been tested and when. Also in small shops e.g. hairdressers, which are to open soon. The hairdresser may demand a fresh test from the costumer, but what about the hairdresser's test?

I agree that the quick test allowance represents a loosening up of demands, but I disagree that it reduces the effect to almost nothing.

There's a certain frequency among hospital staff for tests, obviously. That the hairdresser's customers are tested, does introduce an element of security. As regards the hairdressers themselves, I think there's mainly just a general recommendation for frequent testing, even several ones weekly, from the authorities, like for all people on the labour market. Some hairdressers might choose to present their recent tests in public to customers, though it may be few, at least for a start.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 08:51:27 AM
I don't know about all of you but this second shot kicks like a mule.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 09:43:44 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 08:11:24 AM
I agree that the quick test allowance represents a loosening up of demands, but I disagree that it reduces the effect to almost nothing.

One of the weak points of a corona pass is that it is primarily required in places where many people are gathered, and in such a place only one single person with active covid 19 will be able to cause great spread of the virus. Of course, the probability of the presence of a sick person is somewhat less, but only one is enough, and for that reason it is dangerous to rely on a general probability calculation regarding the infection. The people with risky behavior are the ones who are most likely to get the virus and also the ones who are most likely to infect others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 09:46:16 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 08:51:27 AM
I don't know about all of you but this second shot kicks like a mule.

Congratulations  :), you probably have a good immune response from the vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 10:22:10 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 08:51:27 AM
I don't know about all of you but this second shot kicks like a mule.

How so, DavidW?  I rec'd mine yesterday AM, and upper arm hurts real bad still, perhaps a slight rise in temp. last night (I didn't measure it to be sure, but strongly suspected).  Certainly felt warm on a chilly night and also, very, very tired.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 11:12:55 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 10:22:10 AM
How so, DavidW?  I rec'd mine yesterday AM, and upper arm hurts real bad still, perhaps a slight rise in temp. last night (I didn't measure it to be sure, but strongly suspected).  Certainly felt warm on a chilly night and also, very, very tired.

Same symptoms as you plus a headache and muscle pains.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 02, 2021, 11:14:54 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 10:22:10 AM
How so, DavidW?  I rec'd mine yesterday AM, and upper arm hurts real bad still, perhaps a slight rise in temp. last night (I didn't measure it to be sure, but strongly suspected).  Certainly felt warm on a chilly night and also, very, very tired.

Which vaccin did you get.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 02, 2021, 11:18:19 AM
Coming Monday I get my Zeneca jab. I know for sure that many let it pass, but I will get it anyway.
I am prepared for some response, more or less.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 12:21:07 PM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 02, 2021, 11:18:19 AM
Coming Monday I get my Zeneca jab. I know for sure that many let it pass, but I will get it anyway.
I am prepared for some response, more or less.

Good decision.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 02, 2021, 12:25:59 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 10:22:10 AM
How so, DavidW?  I rec'd mine yesterday AM, and upper arm hurts real bad still, perhaps a slight rise in temp. last night (I didn't measure it to be sure, but strongly suspected).  Certainly felt warm on a chilly night and also, very, very tired.

I got my second Pfizer Wednesday, - no discomfort but a very transitory soreness in the shoulder. So my immune response may be limited.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2021, 12:46:25 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
Reports are that vaccines reduce the risks of infecting others, it was reported even today as well. Needs further studies, but maybe up to 90%.

Tests can be inaccurate, but they are mostly correct, PCRs up to 95%.

So even if there's still a risk, it is significantly lowered. That's the whole point.

Besides, due to work, I've had to use public transport for 3 days with half a dozen of daily hours in metropolitan trains etc., and it was very umpleasant how corona fatigue and lack of control have made an increasing number of people irresponsible or downright provocative, say as regards wearing masks, keeping distance, approaching people and shouting etc. I did not feel safe. As a result, I've had to order another PCR, my 6th, on Sunday. With a lower infection rate due to the pass in certain public spaces, even such behaviour there would pose less of a risk.

Like it's been the case, I won't be taking public transport unless absolutely necessary, but with a pass, I'd be able to do some cultural activities, eating out, tourist accommodation and possibly travels abroad etc., in a safer environment. Obviously, also safer for people working there, if places are allowed/supposed to open to the public.
That sounds very rough MT.  I'm sorry that you're having to deal with public transport, people under stress acting irresponsibly and/or not taking it seriously, etc.  That must be stressful and hard to deal with.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 02, 2021, 01:02:36 PM
Vaccine skepticism and disregard for containment efforts go hand in hand (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/02/vaccine-skepticism-disregard-containment-efforts-go-hand-in-hand/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 02, 2021, 01:03:51 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2021, 12:46:25 PM
That sounds very rough MT.  I'm sorry that you're having to deal with public transport, people under stress acting irresponsibly and/or not taking it seriously, etc.  That must be stressful and hard to deal with.

PD
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 02:53:23 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
I've had to use public transport for 3 days with half a dozen of daily hours in metropolitan trains etc., and it was very umpleasant how corona fatigue and lack of control have made an increasing number of people irresponsible or downright provocative, say as regards wearing masks, keeping distance, approaching people and shouting etc. I did not feel safe.

I get angry just when I go to pick up takeout from a restaurant and it is packed with people not wearing masks (and I don't think they even brought them) as if there was no pandemic.  I always think of the Mask of the Red Death. 

I couldn't imagine needing to be in a public place (as opposed to just wanting to) and being surrounded by people not wearing masks for an extended period of time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 03:23:59 PM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 11:12:55 AM
Same symptoms as you plus a headache and muscle pains.

Hope you're doing much better, DavidW.  Good excuse to pamper yourself with alimentary and audio treats!   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 03:28:54 PM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 02, 2021, 11:14:54 AM
Which vaccin did you get.

Pfizer, which also coincidentally has a large presence in this town.  My "impaler" stabbed deep, I believe, more than I'm accustomed to at any rate...maybe I'd be doing better if I actually had some muscle there  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 03:33:31 PM
Quote from: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 02:53:23 PM
I get angry just when I go to pick up takeout from a restaurant and it is packed with people not wearing masks (and I don't think they even brought them) as if there was no pandemic.  I always think of the Mask of the Red Death. 

I couldn't imagine needing to be in a public place (as opposed to just wanting to) and being surrounded by people not wearing masks for an extended period of time.

Too many people obsessed with their own need for 'freedom,' with little regard or concern for others.  Twice this week I've asked people whose mask has slipped off their noses to pull them back up.  They complied but unapologetically. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 02, 2021, 04:33:25 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 02, 2021, 03:28:54 PM
Pfizer, which also coincidentally has a large presence in this town.  My "impaler" stabbed deep, I believe, more than I'm accustomed to at any rate...maybe I'd be doing better if I actually had some muscle there  ;D

Pfizer here too.  My impaler was so swift and adroit that I didn't realize she had stabbed. Didn't feel a thing, didn't see any sign of puncture or redness. I was really doubting it had been done at all (saving doses maybe?) until my upper arm started to feel a light soreness tonight, some 10 hours after the shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 02, 2021, 05:15:12 PM
I had the Moderna.  Basically everyone that went to hospitals or drives here received the Pfizer.  Everyone that went to pharmacies excepting Walmart received the Moderna here. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 02, 2021, 07:29:20 PM
Mom got her first shot of Pfizer today. She'll go again in three weeks and get her second dosage. She has only complained of a sore arm right now, so crossing my fingers that's the only problem she encounters. She did mention that her arm hurt even more when she got her flu shot. I'll be following her in due course. I just need to make the phone call to get put on the waiting list.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 10:00:18 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2021, 12:46:25 PM
That sounds very rough MT.  I'm sorry that you're having to deal with public transport, people under stress acting irresponsibly and/or not taking it seriously, etc.  That must be stressful and hard to deal with.

PD

Thanks, well, one's thoughts go to those working under similar curcumstances every day. I think recommendations should be better enforced, but this would require a lot of ressources. But with a good result for the PCR on Sunday, I'll be fine, I've reduced public transport use by literally 99% or so in the previous year, and enjoyed biking more etc., it has worked OK. More people are using public transport now however, and as said, the attitude has become more anarchistic as well, by some.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 03, 2021, 12:04:59 AM
I think there is little doubt anymore that the AZ vaccine had serious side effects in few cases, even if the chances are extremely small.
Now, the occurence of side effects is very normal. But it is unfortunate that they can be very serious in this case.

Experts stress vaccine benefits outweigh risks after seven UK deaths

30 reported cases of blood-clotting issues after AstraZeneca Covid-19 jab out of 18m doses
(https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/apr/02/covid-further-rare-blood-clot-cases-found-in-oxford-astrazeneca-recipients)

After a death of a woman, The Netherlands has halted - again - the use of the vaccine for the under-60s. Germany never restarted.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 03, 2021, 08:50:53 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 05:07:14 AM
Reports are that vaccines reduce the risks of infecting others, it was reported even today as well. Needs further studies, but maybe up to 90%.

Tests can be inaccurate, but they are mostly correct, PCRs up to 95%.

So even if there's still a risk, it is significantly lowered. That's the whole point.

Besides, due to work, I've had to use public transport for 3 days with half a dozen of daily hours in metropolitan trains etc., and it was very umpleasant how corona fatigue and lack of control have made an increasing number of people irresponsible or downright provocative, say as regards wearing masks, keeping distance, approaching people and shouting etc. I did not feel safe. As a result, I've had to order another PCR, my 6th, on Sunday. With a lower infection rate due to the pass in certain public spaces, even such behaviour there would pose less of a risk.

Like it's been the case, I won't be taking public transport unless absolutely necessary, but with a pass, I'd be able to do some cultural activities, eating out, tourist accommodation and possibly travels abroad etc., in a safer environment. Obviously, also safer for people working there, if places are allowed/supposed to open to the public.

Yes, I quite agree, it's impossible to stay safe on public transport.

The last time I used the London Underground, on Wednesday, I felt it was fine going one way - in fact, it felt safer than a visit to the supermarket. On the way back it was a different story. This man was walking up and down and up and down the train, proclaiming to everyone that Jesus loves them. And then a couple of wineos got on and started to talk loudly with each other, shout at each other from one end of the carriage to the other. Next to me, a girl of about 15 started to have a video call without a mask with her friend.

When this crisis started I said to myself it isn't a political thing, but that was naive. It's the working class who need to use public transport to put bread on the table, and so, not surprisingly, it's the working class who are most hit  by the disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 03, 2021, 11:07:35 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 02, 2021, 12:46:25 PM
That sounds very rough MT.  I'm sorry that you're having to deal with public transport, people under stress acting irresponsibly and/or not taking it seriously, etc.  That must be stressful and hard to deal with.

PD

+2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on April 03, 2021, 11:20:20 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 03, 2021, 08:50:53 AM
When this crisis started I said to myself it isn't a political thing, but that was naive. It's the working class who need to use public transport to put bread on the table, and so, not surprisingly, it's the working class who are most hit  by the disease.

Indeed. A truth that is broadly evident in most crises.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 03, 2021, 02:51:42 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 02, 2021, 08:11:24 AM
I agree that the quick test allowance represents a loosening up of demands, but I disagree that it reduces the effect to almost nothing.

The Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen has just published a study which shows that 47% of the quick tests made in Denmark are false negative. This may well be the same elsewhere. I have to say, that I expected somthing like this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 03, 2021, 02:59:48 PM
In the Northern provinces they halted the Zeneca vaccin, because they expect a lot of people to refuse this serum because of sudden unexpected deaths.. And since they do not want to throw it away, it probably means it will stop totally in the Netherlands. Zeneca has become more of a scare for people instead of a cure. Well the GP's will probably go on with it, so there is a small chance I get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 03, 2021, 04:58:26 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 03, 2021, 02:51:42 PM
The Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen has just published a study which shows that 47% of the quick tests made in Denmark are false negative. This may well be the same elsewhere. I have to say, that I expected somthing like this.

Would I be correct in assuming that what you're saying is that there are a lot more cases of Covid19 out in the community than those reported? If so I agree with you and if it is the case it puts this pandemic into an entirely new perspective. A research study last year from one of the NSW universities suggested exactly this. The only difference is that they put the undetected cases up as high as 70 - 80 per cent. I don't know if that study was followed up on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 03, 2021, 09:59:10 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 03, 2021, 02:51:42 PM
The Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen has just published a study which shows that 47% of the quick tests made in Denmark are false negative. This may well be the same elsewhere. I have to say, that I expected somthing like this.

If it's true, it's ridiculously late to find that out, of course. Those suggestions were out very long ago, but then refused. However, there's been mentioning that the result might be influenced by the unprofessional testing staff, skipping thorough procedures, they're mostly students from other sectors. But the defense for putting a lot of trust in those tests is weakened by this study, obviously.

Still, even reducing the number of infected in an environment by more than a half is an improvement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 03, 2021, 11:40:04 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 03, 2021, 09:59:10 PM
If it's true, it's ridiculously late to find that out, of course. Those suggestions were out very long ago, but then refused. However, there's been mentioning that the result might be influenced by the unprofessional testing staff, skipping thorough procedures, they're mostly students from other sectors. But the defense for putting a lot of trust in those tests is weakened by this study, obviously.

Still, even reducing the number of infected in an environment by more than a half is an improvement.

There was a study in the Uk showing that the false negative rate was much lower if the test was given by a trained person. The false negatives are obviously very serious though because they lull people into a false sense of security.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 12:17:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 03, 2021, 11:40:04 PM
There was a study in the Uk showing that the false negative rate was much lower if the test was given by a trained person. The false negatives are obviously very serious though because they lull people into a false sense of security.

I don't think that study was mentioned in the DK reporting. Interesting, since it would mean that there's room for improvement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 04, 2021, 01:40:58 AM
Quote from: Holden on April 03, 2021, 04:58:26 PM
Would I be correct in assuming that what you're saying is that there are a lot more cases of Covid19 out in the community than those reported? If so I agree with you and if it is the case it puts this pandemic into an entirely new perspective. A research study last year from one of the NSW universities suggested exactly this. The only difference is that they put the undetected cases up as high as 70 - 80 per cent. I don't know if that study was followed up on.

Yes, and other than the false negative tests you also have to add those who never get a test, because they don't have symptoms. So 70-80 % undetected all in all sounds very reasonable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 04, 2021, 01:47:34 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 12:17:35 AM
I don't think that study was mentioned in the DK reporting. Interesting, since it would mean that there's room for improvement.

Whatever the cause of the many false negative tests it doesn't change the fact that they are present here and now.

Short resumé of the study:

THE INVESTIGATION
From February 1 to March 23, 117,670 citizens received both a PCR test and an antigen test within 48 hours.

According to the PCR test, 4,069 of them were positive.

However, the antigen test captured only 2,159 of them.

This meant that 1,910 people received a negative test result, even though coronavirus could be detected in the throat.

Source: Statens Serum Institut
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 04, 2021, 03:50:38 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on April 04, 2021, 01:47:34 AM
Whatever the cause of the many false negative tests it doesn't change the fact that they are present here and now.

Short resumé of the study:

THE INVESTIGATION
From February 1 to March 23, 117,670 citizens received both a PCR test and an antigen test within 48 hours.

According to the PCR test, 4,069 of them were positive.

However, the antigen test captured only 2,159 of them.

This meant that 1,910 people received a negative test result, even though coronavirus could be detected in the throat.

Source: Statens Serum Institut




One extraordinary thing is that in January these tests were permitted by the French government as a passport to enter France from the UK. You only needed to show a recent negative. This was immediately after the discovery of the British Variant. I was shocked! I think I even posted something about it here.

Quote from: Mandryka on December 24, 2020, 02:54:24 AM
Astonished to find today that the Biotime Innova test is allowed as a passport for people in the UK to enter France. Why am I astonished? Because mass testing trials in Liverpool found that that particular test has a false negative rate of about 60%. I just feel as though the world's going mad.

https://uk.ambafrance.org/List-of-antigen-tests-authorized-for-entry-to-France-from-UK-29434

https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2020/12/23/covid-19-liverpool-community-testing-pilot-interim-findings-published/

To which Que rather perceptively responded

Quote from: Que on December 24, 2020, 03:31:10 AM
I'm afraid it is not just a feeling!  ???



It may have been inevitable that Europe would experience a wave because of this variant, but it was extraordinary that they didn't make a more serious effort to slow it down, especially with vaccines on the horizon. I know I'm an outsider looking in and I probably shouldn't comment, but this and France's subsequent complacency vis-a-vis the British Variant have been really reprehensible IMO.   I haven't been following what's been going on in other European countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 10:51:41 AM
They've begun testing the Danish 'Pentabase' test among members of the public here in DK now. Allegedly as good as PCR, but just based on your spit in a small container.

Interesting and easier, if it works, but it still has to go to a lab for the result.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 04, 2021, 03:19:27 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 10:51:41 AM
They've begun testing the Danish 'Pentabase' test among members of the public here in DK now. Allegedly as good as PCR, but just based on your spit in a small container.

Interesting and easier, if it works, but it still has to go to a lab for the result.

I saw somewhere where dogs had been trained to sniff out COVID in people who had it. 95% accuracy apparently
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 09:22:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on April 04, 2021, 03:19:27 PM
I saw somewhere where dogs had been trained to sniff out COVID in people who had it. 95% accuracy apparently

Yes, they use it in airports and other places, in some countries. Never introduced in my own, though. You'd need a massive number of dogs to use them more broadly, of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 04, 2021, 10:06:10 PM
A dreary Monday morning, winds from the North Pole, 5 Beaufort, wet snow, hail, extremely cloudy, and in exactly 30 minutes I get my Zeneca jab, how bizar is this setting.
O, well bottoms up I guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 04, 2021, 11:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 04, 2021, 10:06:10 PM
A dreary Monday morning, winds from the North Pole, 5 Beaufort, wet snow, hail, extremely cloudy, and in exactly 30 minutes I get my Zeneca jab, how bizar is this setting.
O, well bottoms up I guess.

Good job/jab!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 11:21:32 PM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 04, 2021, 10:06:10 PM
A dreary Monday morning, winds from the North Pole, 5 Beaufort, wet snow, hail, extremely cloudy, and in exactly 30 minutes I get my Zeneca jab, how bizar is this setting.
O, well bottoms up I guess.

Congratulations!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 04, 2021, 11:58:36 PM
Quote from: Que on April 04, 2021, 11:14:55 PM
Good job/jab!  :)

That made me laugh, thanks Que.
Everyone that made an appearance in the health center was clearly motivated to get this vaccin.
Although there was a deranged woman, who loudly proclaimed we would all die, and that a chip would be injected too.
She was removed from the center.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 04, 2021, 11:59:22 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 04, 2021, 11:21:32 PM
Congratulations!

Thank you, now hopefully the side effects will be minimal. :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 05, 2021, 05:32:03 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 04, 2021, 11:58:36 PM
That made me laugh, thanks Que.
Everyone that made an appearance in the health center was clearly motivated to get this vaccin.
Although there was a deranged woman, who loudly proclaimed we would all die, and that a chip would be injected too.
She was removed from the center.

The chip is from Microsoft so they can monitor you....  :laugh:

And since we are members of this forum, we'll probably all get one!  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 05, 2021, 05:51:55 AM
Quote from: Que on April 05, 2021, 05:32:03 AM
The chip is from Microsoft so they can monitor you....  :laugh:

And since we are members of this forum, we'll probably all get one!  ;)

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 05, 2021, 07:25:52 AM
My side effects only lasted a couple days.  It was a rough time but soon over.  In roughly a week and a half I'll be fully vaccinated. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 05, 2021, 07:57:02 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 05, 2021, 07:25:52 AM
My side effects only lasted a couple days.  It was a rough time but soon over.  In roughly a week and a half I'll be fully vaccinated.

I get the second jab after 12 weeks, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 05, 2021, 08:47:56 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 05, 2021, 07:57:02 AM
I get the second jab after 12 weeks, unfortunately.

Sorry to hear that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 05, 2021, 04:32:19 PM
I was finally able to schedule an appointment here in San Diego County at a Walgreens, but for the 2 part vaccine.  I'll have to go back in May for the second shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 05, 2021, 05:04:03 PM
Quote from: Daverz on April 05, 2021, 04:32:19 PM
I was finally able to schedule an appointment here in San Diego County at a Walgreens, but for the 2 part vaccine.  I'll have to go back in May for the second shot.

Great!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 05, 2021, 05:37:07 PM
I had my second dose of the Pfizer this afternoon. So far (6 hours later) nothing to report. But I arranged to have tomorrow off from work in case I do get some reaction.

I've seen several people on Twitter and Facebook report they got their second dose in the last day or so (including at least one other GMG member). A hopeful sign.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 05, 2021, 06:18:16 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 05, 2021, 05:37:07 PM
I had my second dose of the Pfizer this afternoon. So far (6 hours later) nothing to report. But I arranged to have tomorrow off from work in case I do get some reaction.

I've seen several people on Twitter and Facebook report they got their second dose in the last day or so (including at least one other GMG member). A hopeful sign.

Me too. Close to 7 hours since #2, no side effects yet.
My only side effect to the first Pfizer shot was arm soreness starting 8-12 hrs after the shot, lasting 36-48 hrs.
My sister (1 year younger) reported no side effects at all from Pfizer #2, received last week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 05, 2021, 06:37:44 PM
Quote from: JBS on April 05, 2021, 05:37:07 PM
I had my second dose of the Pfizer this afternoon. So far (6 hours later) nothing to report. But I arranged to have tomorrow off from work in case I do get some reaction.

I've seen several people on Twitter and Facebook report they got their second dose in the last day or so (including at least one other GMG member). A hopeful sign.

Quote from: T. D. on April 05, 2021, 06:18:16 PM
Me too. Close to 7 hours since #2, no side effects yet.
My only side effect to the first Pfizer shot was arm soreness starting 8-12 hrs after the shot, lasting 36-48 hrs.
My sister (1 year younger) reported no side effects at all from Pfizer #2, received last week.

Well done, gents!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 05, 2021, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: T. D. on April 05, 2021, 06:18:16 PM
Me too. Close to 7 hours since #2, no side effects yet.
My only side effect to the first Pfizer shot was arm soreness starting 8-12 hrs after the shot, lasting 36-48 hrs.
My sister (1 year younger) reported no side effects at all from Pfizer #2, received last week.

Great to read. It seems the Pfizer and Moderna are the vaccines to get. I read the Johnson & Johnson is only about 60% (or something around this percentage) effective. Perhaps those who are low-risk would be well to get the J & J, but I personally will be getting the Pfizer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 06, 2021, 01:16:22 AM
(https://www.vinatis.com/54071-thickbox_default/test-covid-2018-chapelle-berard.png)


https://www.vinatis.com/43128-test-covid-2018-chapelle-berard
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 06, 2021, 07:09:49 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 05, 2021, 07:31:19 PM
Great to read. It seems the Pfizer and Moderna are the vaccines to get. I read the Johnson & Johnson is only about 60% (or something around this percentage) effective. Perhaps those who are low-risk would be well to get the J & J, but I personally will be getting the Pfizer.

Do you have an appointment yet?  What phase is your state in?  SC is in phase 2.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2021, 07:13:00 AM
My wife had 2nd jab today (Oxford/AZ), administered by army cadets  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 06, 2021, 07:15:42 AM
I read that the US army is developing a new vaccine that should be more effective against the variants.  Will be good down the road for the eventual booster shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 06, 2021, 07:40:53 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2021, 07:13:00 AM
My wife had 2nd jab today (Oxford/AZ), administered by army cadets  :o

Any side effects from the first jab?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 06, 2021, 07:43:30 AM
Well my side effects were the following, Muscle pain, within reason, headache quite severe, waking every other hour in the night, in general not feeling well, I am in my second day now.
But my wife had the same effects, just worse, much so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 06, 2021, 07:44:09 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 06, 2021, 07:15:42 AM
I read that the US army is developing a new vaccine that should be more effective against the variants.  Will be good down the road for the eventual booster shot.

Good news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 06, 2021, 08:50:48 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 06, 2021, 07:40:53 AM
Any side effects from the first jab?
Yes Harry - she had flu-like symptoms/headache for a day or two. No reaction so far to jab No.2.
I felt slightly giddy and disorientated for a few minutes after my first jab, although my wife tells me that that is my normal state - but was otherwise fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 06, 2021, 10:30:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 06, 2021, 08:50:48 AM
Yes Harry - she had flu-like symptoms/headache for a day or two. No reaction so far to jab No.2.
I felt slightly giddy and disorientated for a few minutes after my first jab, although my wife tells me that that is my normal state - but was otherwise fine.


:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 07, 2021, 03:38:08 PM
Just got my first jab of Pfizer.  I go back on May 5 for the second one.  I had to go to a Walgreens 15 miles away to find an appointment.  The Lyft driver on the way home was a chatty idiot who shared his theory about vaccines melting babies' brains.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on April 07, 2021, 06:21:28 PM
Since it's now more than 48 hours since I got the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine, I think I can say the side effects were a repeat of those from the first dose:
Elevated temperature that night (not a fever but well above normal)
Chills for about 1/2 hour the next morning
Sore arm (still a bit sore)
Bad flare up of arthritis in my shoulder that took about 2 days to subside.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 06:58:46 AM
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-vaccines-idUSKBN2BW1MB

J&J COVID-19 vaccine under EU review over blood clots, AstraZeneca probe grows
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 09, 2021, 07:03:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 06:58:46 AM
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-vaccines-idUSKBN2BW1MB

J&J COVID-19 vaccine under EU review over blood clots, AstraZeneca probe grows

Probably all vaccins have this rare side effect, still it is necessary for all getting the vaccin.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 09, 2021, 07:05:48 AM
The side effects from my Zeneca jab, are still in effect, be it in a mild way. it is 4 days further on, but Flu like symptoms, slight headache, some what lower BP, feverish, though not much, body feels uncomfortable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 07:45:51 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on April 09, 2021, 07:03:24 AM
Probably all vaccins have this rare side effect, still it is necessary for all getting the vaccin.

Can we say anything a priori about the likely incidence of the unusual clots associated with AZ in the case of the second dose in a subject who didn't experience them on the first dose?


I have another question for the medics.

At the start of April the UK had reported  79 cases of rare clots in  20.2M doses, and Germany reported 31 cases of cerebral thrombosis, and had distributed 2.7M doses. What is the explanation for this disparity?

https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n883
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-issues-new-advice-concluding-a-possible-link-between-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-and-extremely-rare-unlikely-to-occur-blood-clots
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 07:49:07 AM
My mother, 74 but quite fit, had no real side effects from her first Pfizer jab three days ago. A sister, 65, had quite massive side effects from it. A 3rd sister, 72, hasn't gotten the vaccine yet.

Due to the discussions, the AZ has been put on halt here in DK. But it's been promised, that people will be allowed to choose another, if they wish - of course, this might likely imply delays at the time.

According to current schedules, I'll be getting a first call in late April or in May, and a second call in late May or early June.
I don't know whether it's going to be Pfizer, J&J, Moderna, or AZ, that will be offered. There's hope things will go faster. On Monday, they plan to give vaccines to 100,000 people, that's close to 2% of the population, in a single day.

Now, a combination is also being discussed - say the first shot of AZ might be supplemented with a second shot of a different vaccine.
But it seems that there are no medical records for such a procedure ...  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 09, 2021, 08:23:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 07:49:07 AM
Now, a combination is also being discussed - say the first shot of AZ might be supplemented with a second shot of a different vaccine.
But it seems that there are no medical records for such a procedure ...  ???

I thought you were not supposed to mix vaccines!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 08:26:54 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 09, 2021, 08:23:24 AM
I thought you were not supposed to mix vaccines!

Yes, that was the story just a short time ago - as far as I remember, they skipped 15 mio J&J because of a mixing error ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 09:05:57 AM
In the news now - German and Austrian scientists say that they have likely located the antibodies that create problems in a very few AZ cases - they're called PF4. It's probably going to make future vaccines easier.

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-362354/v1
(News, in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-04-09-forskere-har-paa-rekordtid-gjort-banebrydende-blodprop-opdagelse )
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2021, 10:32:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 09:05:57 AM
In the news now - German and Austrian scientists say that they have likely located the antibodies that create problems in a very few AZ cases - they're called PF4. It's probably going to make future vaccines easier.

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-362354/v1
(News, in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-04-09-forskere-har-paa-rekordtid-gjort-banebrydende-blodprop-opdagelse )
Good news MT. My wife does not seemed to have suffered any bad side-effects from the 2ndOxford AZ vaccine. She is just as bossy as usual  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 09, 2021, 10:38:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2021, 10:32:17 AM
Good news MT. My wife does not seemed to have suffered any bad side-effects from the 2ndOxford AZ vaccine. She is just as bossy as usual  ;D

That's good news, for the first jab had some unpleasantness. :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 09, 2021, 11:03:31 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2021, 10:32:17 AM
Good news MT. My wife does not seemed to have suffered any bad side-effects from the 2ndOxford AZ vaccine. She is just as bossy as usual  ;D

;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2021, 11:20:34 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 09, 2021, 10:32:17 AM
Good news MT. My wife does not seemed to have suffered any bad side-effects from the 2ndOxford AZ vaccine. She is just as bossy as usual  ;D
Careful, Jeffrey, as she might occasionally check out what you are saying here!  :-\  ;)

Still waiting to get my shots....eventually!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 11:37:23 AM
Prince Philip quote about reincarnating as a deadly virus to solve 'overpopulation' resurfaces

https://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/news/prince-philip-quote-about-reincarnating-as-a-deadly-virus-to-solve-overpopulation-resurfaces/articleshow/81992882.cms

(This is the deadly virus thread isn't it?)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 11:38:33 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 09, 2021, 08:23:24 AM
I thought you were not supposed to mix vaccines!

I don't think you are mixing them. I mean once you have the second dose all the AZ has been evacuated from your body.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 09, 2021, 01:37:44 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 09, 2021, 11:38:33 AM
I don't think you are mixing them. I mean once you have the second dose all the AZ has been evacuated from your body.

lol you're so literal! ;D  That is not what I meant.  I didn't think they were shaking up a cocktail.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 09, 2021, 02:34:52 PM
I really thought that I would end up getting the AstraZeneca vaccine... ::)

But the Dutch government has decided that the under-60s will no longer receive it.
Which will result in the akward situation that mostly those aged 60 -75 will have the AZ vaccine, since those over 75 already got Pfizer.

The reports on similar side effects on the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson vaccine are worrisome, since we need options to get everyone vaccinated.

Q
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 09, 2021, 03:16:20 PM
Only side effect of Pfizer dose 1 for me was a sore shoulder.  Oh, and autism, but my background level of dysfunction is so high that you can't tell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 09, 2021, 06:43:59 PM
Ted Nugent Wants to Know Where the Shutdowns Were for COVID-1 Through COVID-18 — No, Really (https://www.spin.com/2021/04/ted-nugent-covid-19-facebook-live/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=the-hard-times)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 09, 2021, 10:48:36 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 09, 2021, 11:20:34 AM
Careful, Jeffrey, as she might occasionally check out what you are saying here!  :-\  ;)

Still waiting to get my shots....eventually!

PD
Haha - I think that she's aware of my views  :)
Hope you get your shot soon PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 10, 2021, 06:58:28 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 09, 2021, 06:43:59 PM
Ted Nugent Wants to Know Where the Shutdowns Were for COVID-1 Through COVID-18 — No, Really (https://www.spin.com/2021/04/ted-nugent-covid-19-facebook-live/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=the-hard-times)

Hahaha!  That is rich!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 11, 2021, 05:47:56 AM
Blame it on Covid-19 (I think) : yesterday, pfeeling brave with my two Pfizer inoculations and protectively masked, I sallied forth eager to add to my (already excessive) CD collection. My target : Halfprice Books, which is responsible (guilty?) for an estimated 20-25% of the Stürmisch Collection. My excitement was running high - no new CDs purchased in a public sphere (some through the mail) for approx. a year!  The bins were jam-packed, just like the good ol' days, but  :'( there wasn't a single disc that appealed or interested.  OK, I sez to myself, maybe there'll be treasures like before on the $2 shelves, where many Marco Polos were wont to be found.  Nope, not a one.  Felt like maybe I'd died of Covid and was now a resident of Hell:  surrounded by hundreds of classical CDs and not a single one that struck my fancy...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 11, 2021, 06:55:47 AM
QuoteFelt like maybe I'd died of Covid and was now a resident of Hell:  surrounded by hundreds of classical CDs and not a single one that struck my fancy...

Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink.  8)

Being lost at sea is a good metaphor for our current predicament...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 11, 2021, 07:08:44 AM
Quote from: Que on April 11, 2021, 06:55:47 AM
Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink.  8)

Being lost at sea is a good metaphor for our current predicament...

Indeed (and I forgot to mention I pawed through the LPs too!, though there weren't so very many of those...).  I suppose that posting such a 'non-adventure' is itself a measure of how under "house arrest" I've been. Sure wish the human race were smarter and our officials cleverer and less self-serving.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 11, 2021, 07:15:03 AM
I gave up on browsing and buying cds in person many years ago. Cd shops dried up, and their classical sections for the remaining ones were just pathetic.  There was a local cd shop here several years ago.  The only thing they stocked were pop music from the 90s. ???  Who is this for?  Talking about appealing to an almost non-existent demographic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 11, 2021, 08:46:20 AM
Quote from: DavidW on April 11, 2021, 07:15:03 AM
I gave up on browsing and buying cds in person many years ago. Cd shops dried up, and their classical sections for the remaining ones were just pathetic.  There was a local cd shop here several years ago.  The only thing they stocked were pop music from the 90s. ???  Who is this for?  Talking about appealing to an almost non-existent demographic.

Sympathies, DavidW, because the thrill of the in-person hunt and serendipitous find is electric.  Halfprice often has something interesting and I couldn't help but wonder if the classical crowd might be staying away in these Covid times more than perhaps other interests...older, wiser, but sheer speculation on my part.  Interestingly, the $2 shelves were brimming with country music, Faith Hill, et al.  I've been fortunate to live in college towns where one might justifiably say the listening habits of the locals included more classical than perhaps other places.  And while most of my Goodwill safaris end-up empty-handed, several uncovered troves so bounteous I couldn't carry them all (inc. one memorable Sat. morning I bought 40-odd recordings of Mahler symphonies, someone's collection evidently, some of them still in the orig. wraps). I thought I was in a dream.       
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on April 11, 2021, 01:33:17 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 09, 2021, 06:43:59 PM
Ted Nugent Wants to Know Where the Shutdowns Were for COVID-1 Through COVID-18 — No, Really (https://www.spin.com/2021/04/ted-nugent-covid-19-facebook-live/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=the-hard-times)

The guy who wrote Cat Scratch Fever is not the sharpest tool in the shed.  Who coulda knowed?

Even in Ted's heyday, 11-year old me could hear that his music was trash.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 11, 2021, 04:04:20 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 11, 2021, 05:47:56 AM
Blame it on Covid-19 (I think) : yesterday, pfeeling brave with my two Pfizer inoculations and protectively masked, I sallied forth eager to add to my (already excessive) CD collection. My target : Halfprice Books, which is responsible (guilty?) for an estimated 20-25% of the Stürmisch Collection. My excitement was running high - no new CDs purchased in a public sphere (some through the mail) for approx. a year!  The bins were jam-packed, just like the good ol' days, but  :'( there wasn't a single disc that appealed or interested.  OK, I sez to myself, maybe there'll be treasures like before on the $2 shelves, where many Marco Polos were wont to be found.  Nope, not a one.  Felt like maybe I'd died of Covid and was now a resident of Hell:  surrounded by hundreds of classical CDs and not a single one that struck my fancy...

Its possible they've had a policy of not buying new stock or as little as possible over the last year as a way of keeping the business afloat over the last year and you're looking at the same stock you've already picked the desirable items out of.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on April 12, 2021, 04:41:09 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on April 11, 2021, 04:04:20 PM
Its possible they've had a policy of not buying new stock or as little as possible over the last year as a way of keeping the business afloat over the last year and you're looking at the same stock you've already picked the desirable items out of.

I like that logic, Simon.  Thanks, it could very well be.  I know they're paying less for customers' trade-ins, which is the bulwark of their biz, and that surely could be affecting quality of the stock.  Just going to have to  order something through the mail to get my CD fix. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 14, 2021, 12:11:57 AM
Red letter day, Friday. Second jab in the morning and thanks to the end of lockdown the first visit to a record store for months. Play my cards right I may even enjoy a pint in outside a pub. :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on April 14, 2021, 12:13:49 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 14, 2021, 12:11:57 AM
Red letter day, Friday. Second jab in the morning and thanks to the end of lockdown the first visit to a record store for months. Play my cards right I may even enjoy a pint in outside a pub. :P

Nice....enjoy :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 14, 2021, 02:05:30 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 14, 2021, 12:11:57 AM
Red letter day, Friday. Second jab in the morning and thanks to the end of lockdown the first visit to a record store for months. Play my cards right I may even enjoy a pint in outside a pub. :P
Excellent Lol! Have a good day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 14, 2021, 06:36:35 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 14, 2021, 02:05:30 AM
Excellent Lol! Have a good day.
Quote from: "Harry" on April 14, 2021, 12:13:49 AM
Nice....enjoy :)

Thanks chaps. Hopefully I can post some purchases be it CD or LP.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 14, 2021, 07:03:36 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 14, 2021, 12:11:57 AM
Red letter day, Friday. Second jab in the morning and thanks to the end of lockdown the first visit to a record store for months. Play my cards right I may even enjoy a pint in outside a pub. :P
Yeah!  Hope that all goes smoothly.  :)  And enjoy your day out!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on April 15, 2021, 02:22:05 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 14, 2021, 06:36:35 AM
Thanks chaps. Hopefully I can post some purchases be it CD or LP.

Ah, the predicted surge in pent up spending. Best of luck with everything.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 15, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 15, 2021, 02:22:05 AM
Ah, the predicted surge in pent up spending. Best of luck with everything.
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 14, 2021, 07:03:36 AM
Yeah!  Hope that all goes smoothly.  :)  And enjoy your day out!



PD

Thanks very much. I wonder if there will be a surge in spending, the hospitality industry are counting on it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on April 15, 2021, 12:44:31 PM
Quote from: Irons on April 15, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
I wonder if there will be a surge in spending, the hospitality industry are counting on it.

Private household saving is at an all time record high in my country. That is not like us at all. There will be a deluge of spending when this is all over. Then we will be bankrupt.......again  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 15, 2021, 02:56:05 PM
Massachusetts Vaccination update:
1,916,830 people are fully vaccinated in Massachusetts (up 41,514 from yesterday).
2,917,816 people have received at least one dose of Moderna or Pfizer (includes people who are fully vaccinated).
1,716,407 people have received both doses of Moderna or Pfizer.
200,423 people have received Janssen (Johnson & Johnson).
5,631,560 vaccine doses have been shipped to Massachusetts.
85.8 percent of doses shipped have been reported as administered.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 15, 2021, 02:57:27 PM
Quote from: aligreto on April 15, 2021, 02:22:05 AM
Ah, the predicted surge in pent up spending. Best of luck with everything.

(* chortle *)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 16, 2021, 02:58:13 AM
 - situation still stable here in DK, where more opening up is going to take place next Wednesday etc., the tourist sector in particular is waiting for a flux of foreigners that will only slowly begin later, however.

- with the J&J put on a halt, and the AZ postponed indefinitely here, but more Pfizers coming, and vaccines being administered purely in relation to age groups now, I'm still waiting whether my shot will be delayed. I hope not; at best, there'll be a first call in the end of April, or some time in May. There's a debate whether stored AZ vaccines, about 200,000, can be chosen by those who want it anyway, or should be given or sold to other countries. The official risk estimate here is that 1 in 40,000 cases will experience tough health problems because of the AZ.

- at the AZ stop press conference, the female official fainted. I've seen depressingly idiotic social media posts claiming, that she was probably suffering from vaccine diseases (she has likely not even had a vaccine) - or even, in all earnesty, that her appearance was sabotaged via a secret vaccine nano-microchip from global medicine companies.

- the virus has unexpectedly meant a revival for the old, tiny administrative level of the church parish here;
the authorities reacting on a micro-level, a certain amount of virus will automatically mean that a parish is closed down. Some side-effects have been unfortunate, such as the closure of local educational institutions without any virus cases. A map of the current virus levels, as per parish, is now being released, probably regularly from now on ...
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-04-15-her-er-det-hidtil-mest-detaljerede-kort-over-smitteniveauet-lige-nu
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 16, 2021, 07:11:48 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 15, 2021, 12:44:31 PM
Private household saving is at an all time record high in my country. That is not like us at all. There will be a deluge of spending when this is all over. Then we will be bankrupt.......again  ;D

Not sure why I found it interesting but I did. Post lockdown is at 30% pre-Covid levels on public transport and the roads are at 90%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2021, 07:51:57 AM
Well, my perseverance finally paid off!  I'm scheduled to get round one of the vaccine soon.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 17, 2021, 07:57:58 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2021, 07:51:57 AM
Well, my perseverance finally paid off!  I'm scheduled to get round one of the vaccine soon.   :)

PD

Excellent, PD!

My system has taken Dose # 2 in stride.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 17, 2021, 10:07:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 17, 2021, 07:57:58 AM
Excellent, PD!

My system has taken Dose # 2 in stride.
Good deal!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 17, 2021, 01:38:28 PM
I had my first AstraZeneca yesterday. The (test & )vaccination center was incredibly busy with hundreds of 65+ citizens getting in line, waiting before and after the jab. An unusual and somehow unsettling spectacle....
It feels good, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 17, 2021, 04:18:42 PM
Quote from: pjme on April 17, 2021, 01:38:28 PM
I had my first AstraZeneca yesterday. The (test & )vaccination center was incredibly busy with hundreds of 65+ citizens getting in line, waiting before and after the jab. An unusual and somehow unsettling spectacle....
It feels good, though.


Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 18, 2021, 06:47:11 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 16, 2021, 07:51:57 AM
Well, my perseverance finally paid off!  I'm scheduled to get round one of the vaccine soon.   :)

PD

Excellent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2021, 12:32:29 PM
Quote from: pjme on April 17, 2021, 01:38:28 PM
I had my first AstraZeneca yesterday. The (test & )vaccination center was incredibly busy with hundreds of 65+ citizens getting in line, waiting before and after the jab. An unusual and somehow unsettling spectacle....
It feels good, though.
I'm glad that you received your first shot.  Surprised though that they had all of these people lined up.  Were there no appointments set up?  Or just that it was at a huge place?

Quote from: Irons on April 18, 2021, 06:47:11 AM
Excellent.
Had it today I'm happy to report.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2021, 11:25:46 AM
As I mentioned, I had my first shot yesterday (Moderna).  Didn't notice any side effects yesterday but this morning I awoke to finding that my shoulder was pretty sore.  A bit of a challenge to work out in the garden.  Hopefully, it will go away soon.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 19, 2021, 11:27:17 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2021, 11:25:46 AM
As I mentioned, I had my first shot yesterday (Moderna).  Didn't notice any side effects yesterday but this morning I awoke to finding that my shoulder was pretty sore.  A bit of a challenge to work out in the garden.  Hopefully, it will go away soon.

PD

Here's hoping!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2021, 12:58:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 19, 2021, 11:27:17 AM
Here's hoping!
+1

Sky News today:
COVID news live: Latest as Boris Johnson to hold coronavirus press conference today and new research offers more vitamin D evidence
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2021, 01:00:06 AM
Quote from: pjme on April 17, 2021, 01:38:28 PM
I had my first AstraZeneca yesterday. The (test & )vaccination center was incredibly busy with hundreds of 65+ citizens getting in line, waiting before and after the jab. An unusual and somehow unsettling spectacle....
It feels good, though.
Good news  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on April 20, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
Just had my first AstraZeneca vaccine today. Round two is slated to be in about four months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 20, 2021, 10:07:11 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2021, 12:32:29 PM
I'm glad that you received your first shot.  Surprised though that they had all of these people lined up.  Were there no appointments set up?  Or just that it was at a huge place
PD

It is huge, but the organization was good. Plenty of stewards & help:
(https://antwerpen.testcovid.be/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/toegang.jpg)



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2021, 10:23:18 PM
Quote from: OrchestralNut on April 20, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
Just had my first AstraZeneca vaccine today. Round two is slated to be in about four months.
Excellent! That is good news. My wife has had both shots (Oxford/AZ) but I'm waiting for No.2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2021, 09:58:07 AM
Quote from: OrchestralNut on April 20, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
Just had my first AstraZeneca vaccine today. Round two is slated to be in about four months.

Very good, mon cher!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 21, 2021, 10:00:15 AM
"Graham is one of about 6,000 unlucky people in the United States who were fully vaccinated against the coronavirus but have been diagnosed with what epidemiologists call "breakthrough cases." These infections are rare and entirely expected; the three vaccines cleared for emergency use provided robust protection in clinical trials, but they aren't perfect."

It's rare and expected, but some fully vaccinated people are catching COVID-19 (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/04/21/nation/its-rare-some-fully-vaccinated-people-are-catching-covid-19/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2021, 10:32:02 AM
Quote from: OrchestralNut on April 20, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
Just had my first AstraZeneca vaccine today. Round two is slated to be in about four months.
Four months!  That sounds like an awfully long time.  Glad that you received your first one though.

Quote from: pjme on April 20, 2021, 10:07:11 PM
It is huge, but the organization was good. Plenty of stewards & help:
(https://antwerpen.testcovid.be/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/toegang.jpg)

Glad that it was well-organized.  Was it just a case of first-come-first-served until they ran out of doses?  Here, as far as I've heard lately, it's all by appointment--even for the large mass vaccination sites.

PD




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 21, 2021, 10:51:15 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2021, 10:32:02 AM
Four months!  That sounds like an awfully long time.  Glad that you received your first one though.

Here too it's 4 months  ::). I got the first shot April 2, the next one will be July 23.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on April 21, 2021, 01:49:44 PM
Quote from: André on April 21, 2021, 10:51:15 AM
Here too it's 4 months  ::). I got the first shot April 2, the next one will be July 23.

Yes, Canada has not been as quick and efficient with its vaccination rollout.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 21, 2021, 02:00:33 PM
Quote from: André on April 21, 2021, 10:51:15 AM
Here too it's 4 months  ::). I got the first shot April 2, the next one will be July 23.

Quote from: OrchestralNut on April 21, 2021, 01:49:44 PM
Yes, Canada has not been as quick and efficient with its vaccination rollout.
A bit confused here and maybe it's a case of two different issues, but is the delay in the second shot due to the specific vaccine?  In any event, I do hope that Canada has managed to figure out things now and and has a plan in place?

PD

Wow. I just read this article.  I hadn't realized that Canada was so far behind (your comments made me look further).  A bit of good news here:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56824177  In any event, I'm so sorry that its been hard for Canadians to get the vaccine.  Wishing you the best.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on April 21, 2021, 03:16:55 PM
To give as many people as possible the protection of the first shot before fulle vaccinating them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on April 21, 2021, 11:09:22 PM
"Glad that it was well-organized.  Was it just a case of first-come-first-served until they ran out of doses?  Here, as far as I've heard lately, it's all by appointment--even for the large mass vaccination sites."

Very strict organization. I got a letter, an email and an SMS - with a personal code. With the code (+ one's national identification code)  one can make an appointment - online or by phone.
I'll get my second jab in 12 weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2021, 02:43:31 AM
Quote from: pjme on April 21, 2021, 11:09:22 PM
"Glad that it was well-organized.  Was it just a case of first-come-first-served until they ran out of doses?  Here, as far as I've heard lately, it's all by appointment--even for the large mass vaccination sites."

Very strict organization. I got a letter, an email and an SMS - with a personal code. With the code (+ one's national identification code)  one can make an appointment - online or by phone.
I'll get my second jab in 12 weeks.

Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2021, 05:00:23 AM
Quote from: The new erato on April 21, 2021, 03:16:55 PM
To give as many people as possible the protection of the first shot before fulle vaccinating them.
I just ran across this article.  It seems that (according to studies) the efficacy of the AZ shot increases if the second dose is giving at a later rather than an earlier date:  https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/03/delaying-second-astrazeneca-vaccine-dose-does-work-study-shows.html

And, yes, it's great too that more people can then get their first round shot too!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 22, 2021, 06:27:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 22, 2021, 05:00:23 AM
I just ran across this article.  It seems that (according to studies) the efficacy of the AZ shot increases if the second dose is giving at a later rather than an earlier date:  https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/03/delaying-second-astrazeneca-vaccine-dose-does-work-study-shows.html

And, yes, it's great too that more people can then get their first round shot too!  :)

PD

Most interesting!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 22, 2021, 09:45:47 AM
Situation in Finland:

Corona cases have been declining for the last month or so.
Restrictions are loosening slowly.
902 corona-deaths.
26 % of population has got at least the first jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 04:07:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 22, 2021, 06:27:26 AM
Most interesting!
Karl (or anyone else here),

Have you recently heard about what percentage of the US has been vaccinated?

I saw various articles about the situation in India; so horrible!  :'(  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56858403

Quote from: 71 dB on April 22, 2021, 09:45:47 AM
Situation in Finland:

Corona cases have been declining for the last month or so.
Restrictions are loosening slowly.
902 corona-deaths.
26 % of population has got at least the first jab.

How do those numbers fare with what your government had been predicting/aiming for?

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on April 23, 2021, 05:18:36 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 04:07:32 AM
Have you recently heard about what percentage of the US has been vaccinated?

About 50% of eligible adults (over 16 years old) have at least one dose. The concerning thing is that according to some reports half of the unvaccinated say they do not intend to get the vaccine. That would prevent the U.S. from reaching the goal of "herd immunity."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 23, 2021, 05:59:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 04:07:32 AM
How do those numbers fare with what your government had been predicting/aiming for?

PD

With Covid-19 the situation changes all the time. 1-2 months ago the predictions where more pessimistic when the UK mutation really invaded Finland and made the virus spread more easily. The Government started to "scare" * people with stricter restrictions and it seems to have worked. The situation got better. Because of this constant change it is difficult to say how much current numbers fare with predictions. Predictions done two weeks ago? Two months ago? Six months ago? The predictions are constantly updated with new data. There has been a lot of uncertainly around how much vaccines are delivered. January - March we didn't get the amounts we expected, but now it has gotten better. I believe the initial target of 70 % (estimated herd immunity threshold) was expected to be reached by July, but now maybe 50 % will be reached at that point and getting to the 70 % target seems to take 1-2 months longer. I think the original aim was to be at around 40 % (instead of 26 %) at his point in time, but that was before we knew about the difficulties of vaccine manufacturers to deliver. Hopefully this answers somehow what you asked.



* The restrictions haven't been very strong in Finland at any point compared to some other European countries so curfew-type restrictions sound quite scare to us. Our constitution protects the rights of people a lot to the point where Corona restrictions have sometimes legally challenging because the infringe rights. :o Finland has managed largely because (most) Finns trust the government and take the recommendations and instructions seriously.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 23, 2021, 06:53:16 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 04:07:32 AM
Have you recently heard about what percentage of the US has been vaccinated?

PD

Top 20 fastest countries: Vaccinations (% of population)

01 - Israel - 62.1 %
02 - UK - 49.0 %
03 - Malta - 45.7 %
04 - Chile - 41.1 %
05 - USA - 40.6 %
06 - Bahrain - 37.8 %
07 - Hungary - 36.3 %
08 - Uruguay - 31.7 %
09 - Serbia - 27.8 %
10 - Canada - 27.0 %
11 - Finland - 26.5 %
12 - Island - 23.6 %
13 - Singapore - 23.3 %
14 - Lithuania - 22.4 %
15 - Estonia - 22.3 %
16 - Germany - 22.1 %
17 - Belgium - 21.9 %
18 - Spain - 21.7 %
19 - Austria - 21.4 %
20 - Norway - 21.1 %

I wonder if the vaccinations in the US will slow down soon because at some point the ones not vaccinated are mostly anti-vaxxers?
I am surprised about how badly South-Korea (4.0 %) and Japan (1.3 %) are doing. Especially Japan looks like a poor third World country!  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 09:35:38 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on April 23, 2021, 05:18:36 AM
About 50% of eligible adults (over 16 years old) have at least one dose. The concerning thing is that according to some reports half of the unvaccinated say they do not intend to get the vaccine. That would prevent the U.S. from reaching the goal of "herd immunity."
Interesting, I was just (literally) looking up the stats and found this on NPR (updated today):  "Since COVID-19 vaccine distribution began in the United States on Dec. 14, more than 218 million doses have been administered, fully vaccinating over 89.3 million people or 26.9% of the total U.S. population."  There's a helpful map by state showing roughly percentages of people who have been fully vaccinated and then another map (again by state) who have received their first shot. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/01/28/960901166/how-is-the-covid-19-vaccination-campaign-going-in-your-state

And, wow!  Half of the people not wanting to get it?!  I had heard that there was a high number of Republicans who indicated that they wouldn't get it; the irony being, to me at least, it seems that it's mostly heavily Republican states/areas which are protesting against lockdown measures, yet they don't want to get the vaccine which would enable their governments to start safely lifting restrictions.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 23, 2021, 01:28:07 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 09:35:38 AM
And, wow!  Half of the people not wanting to get it?!  I had heard that there was a high number of Republicans who indicated that they wouldn't get it; the irony being, to me at least, it seems that it's mostly heavily Republican states/areas which are protesting against lockdown measures, yet they don't want to get the vaccine which would enable their governments to start safely lifting restrictions.  :(

PD

That is common Republican/conservative thinking: If Y causes Z and you are against Z, you are also against X that prevents Y.  :P

Examples:

X = sex education, Y = pregnancies and Z = abortions.
X = vaccines, Y = Corona infections and Z = lockdowns.
X = social safety nets, Y = extreme poverty and Z = robberies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on April 23, 2021, 07:38:55 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 09:35:38 AMAnd, wow!  Half of the people not wanting to get it?!  I had heard that there was a high number of Republicans who indicated that they wouldn't get it; the irony being, to me at least, it seems that it's mostly heavily Republican states/areas which are protesting against lockdown measures, yet they don't want to get the vaccine which would enable their governments to start safely lifting restrictions.  :(

Have of the unvaccinated say they do not want to be vaccinated. Since about 50% of eligible population is at least partially vaccinated, that is about 25% of the total population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on April 24, 2021, 01:29:55 AM
I had my second AZ jab this morning. Super efficient organisation - the clinic wasn't due to open until 08:00 but I got there early. I was processed, jabbed and out by 07:56. The doctor asked me a few health questions and gave information on blood clots. No side effects yet, not even a mark on my arm. I am keeping my fingers crossed that nothing develops but it is less than 3 hours since the jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 04:19:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 23, 2021, 09:35:38 AM
Interesting, I was just (literally) looking up the stats and found this on NPR (updated today):  "Since COVID-19 vaccine distribution began in the United States on Dec. 14, more than 218 million doses have been administered, fully vaccinating over 89.3 million people or 26.9% of the total U.S. population."  There's a helpful map by state showing roughly percentages of people who have been fully vaccinated and then another map (again by state) who have received their first shot. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/01/28/960901166/how-is-the-covid-19-vaccination-campaign-going-in-your-state

And, wow!  Half of the people not wanting to get it?!  I had heard that there was a high number of Republicans who indicated that they wouldn't get it; the irony being, to me at least, it seems that it's mostly heavily Republican states/areas which are protesting against lockdown measures, yet they don't want to get the vaccine which would enable their governments to start safely lifting restrictions.  :(

PD

It's as if these Americans decide they don't want to believe something, and so don't believe it. It just isn't possible for an educated European to think like that, these Americans are from Mars as far as I'm concerned. I blame the school system -- there must be something deeply, fundamentally wrong with the curriculum for there to be such a basic misunderstanding of the relationship between truth and rationality, and rationality and action. God help us.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 06:18:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 04:19:09 AM
It's as if these Americans decide they don't want to believe something, and so don't believe it. It just isn't possible for an educated European to think like that, these Americans are from Mars as far as I'm concerned. I blame the school system -- there must be something deeply, fundamentally wrong with the curriculum for there to be such a basic misunderstanding of the relationship between truth and rationality, and rationality and action. God help us.

Well, I have to eat my words

https://twitter.com/mariannaspring/status/1385925560631705600?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on April 24, 2021, 02:51:21 PM
Strange article in Yhe Guardian:

Victorious over Covid, Australia and New Zealand grapple with vaccine rollout
Australia's glacially slow delivery of jabs derided as a 'farce', while in New Zealand only 4.5% of eligible people have been vaccinated
(https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/apr/22/victorious-over-covid-australia-and-new-zealand-grapple-with-vaccine-rollout)

My understanding, and that of everyone I talk to, is that here in NZ we've been happy to let the vaccines go where they are more urgently needed and have our own orders and timetables pushed back, with largely only frontline workers getting vaccines at this stage. Nobody - apart from the leader of the opposition party - are saying the government is bungling the rollout, and they idea in that article that they don't know how to go about it is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 24, 2021, 04:41:39 PM
The pace of the roll out is not particularly concerning here in Australia simply because we don't have any major outbreaks and seem to be able to control the ones we have. This is the polar opposite to the UK who have vaccinated about 60% of their population already. With the way Covid spread there recently and the accompanying death rate it's appropriate that they get it done as quickly as possible which they seem to be doing. While we don't need to worry about the urgency it is important that the right people are vaccinated first.

The one glitch is Astrazeneca and blood clots which has changed how we will do our roll out with over 50s being prioritised. However, that may be a moot point as the medical authorities are investigating a possible blood clot issue from Pfizer. I'll just wait until I get my text message from the Qld Health and probably go to a pharmacy that is dispensing rather than my GP.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 25, 2021, 04:56:11 AM
75 colleges/universities are now requiring students to get vaccines.  Some are still debating it and others sound like they won't be requiring it.  :(

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/23/us/colleges-requiring-covid-vaccines-wellness/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on April 25, 2021, 08:19:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 25, 2021, 04:56:11 AM
75 colleges/universities are now requiring students to get vaccines.  Some are still debating it and others sound like they won't be requiring it.  :(

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/23/us/colleges-requiring-covid-vaccines-wellness/index.html

PD

Children are required to be up to date with standard vaccinations in order to attend elementary school, I don't see that there is anything unusual about required a Covid-19 vaccine to attend college or participate in critical activities. The only problematic thing that I see is that it is not that easy to get a vaccine, at present. I had to check a web site daily to try to schedule a vaccine appointment, and it took weeks of checking to get a slot. If an institution is going to require it, they should be prepared to provide it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 25, 2021, 12:39:30 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 04:19:09 AM
It's as if these Americans decide they don't want to believe something, and so don't believe it.

Trumpism in a nutshell. I mean, Republicans have been doing that to some degree for a while (climate change, e.g.) but now, it's the Trump brand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on April 25, 2021, 08:45:28 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on April 23, 2021, 05:18:36 AM
About 50% of eligible adults (over 16 years old) have at least one dose. The concerning thing is that according to some reports half of the unvaccinated say they do not intend to get the vaccine. That would prevent the U.S. from reaching the goal of "herd immunity."
5 million Americans who have had their first shot hsven't turned up for sppointments to have their 2nd shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 26, 2021, 12:20:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 25, 2021, 12:39:30 PM
Trumpism in a nutshell. I mean, Republicans have been doing that to some degree for a while (climate change, e.g.) but now, it's the Trump brand.

Yes sure, but that's like blaming the concentration camps on one man, Hitler, demonising one man, making a scapegoat, serves to absolve the evil which was banal. And similarly here, the irrationality is banal too, it seems.

A friend of mine uses the term endarkenment - the opposite of enlightenment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 26, 2021, 03:52:16 AM
Quote from: The new erato on April 25, 2021, 08:45:28 PM
5 million Americans who have had their first shot hsven't turned up for sppointments to have their 2nd shot.
I heard this morning that 8% of Americans haven't shown up for their second; haven't done the math to see whether or not that's the same (heard on CNN earlier this morning).  :(

Quote from: Spotted Horses on April 25, 2021, 08:19:56 AM
Children are required to be up to date with standard vaccinations in order to attend elementary school, I don't see that there is anything unusual about required a Covid-19 vaccine to attend college or participate in critical activities. The only problematic thing that I see is that it is not that easy to get a vaccine, at present. I had to check a web site daily to try to schedule a vaccine appointment, and it took weeks of checking to get a slot. If an institution is going to require it, they should be prepared to provide it.

At least some of them are:  https://www.wbaltv.com/article/notre-dame-of-maryland-university-offer-covid-19-vaccines-to-students-in-preparation-for-fall/36110833  Just an example.  Like you, I had trouble booking my first appointment and had to persevere (spent a lot of time on my computer), but I got it!  :)  They then set up my appointment for the second one there.  I did also receive a pre-recorded phone call recently for a chance to get vaccinated at a local college (I suspect that they had some leftover vaccines after vaccinating their students).  I had put my name on a standby list back when I was trying to get my first shot.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 10:04:54 AM
Just received a text telling me to book my Vaccine No.2, which I've done for early Saturday morning at my local surgery.
BBC News started early just now to go straight to President Biden's vaccine statement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 27, 2021, 10:25:14 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 10:04:54 AM
Just received a text telling me to book my Vaccine No.2, which I've done for early Saturday morning at my local surgery.
BBC News started early just now to go straight to President Biden's vaccine statement.

Don't forget to take your vaccine certificate from the first dose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 27, 2021, 11:15:10 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 10:04:54 AM
Just received a text telling me to book my Vaccine No.2, which I've done for early Saturday morning at my local surgery.
BBC News started early just now to go straight to President Biden's vaccine statement.

Good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 27, 2021, 12:32:07 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 10:04:54 AM
Just received a text telling me to book my Vaccine No.2, which I've done for early Saturday morning at my local surgery.
BBC News started early just now to go straight to President Biden's vaccine statement.
A bit confused here as when I received my first shot, they told me when I needed to come back; in essence, made the second appointment for me.  Were you able to make it at the best time/date (thinking best effective)?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 27, 2021, 01:06:51 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 04:19:09 AM
It's as if these Americans decide they don't want to believe something, and so don't believe it. It just isn't possible for an educated European to think like that, these Americans are from Mars as far as I'm concerned. I blame the school system -- there must be something deeply, fundamentally wrong with the curriculum for there to be such a basic misunderstanding of the relationship between truth and rationality, and rationality and action. God help us.
Quote from: Mandryka on April 24, 2021, 06:18:52 AM
Well, I have to eat my words

https://twitter.com/mariannaspring/status/1385925560631705600?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

No, Americans are bigger dumbasses! I'll see that and raise you one:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56905752

A Miami school has discouraged teachers from getting the Covid vaccine, saying any vaccinated employees will be barred from interacting with students.

Centner Academy leadership cited debunked claims of non-vaccinated people being "negatively impacted" by contact with vaccinated people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 27, 2021, 12:32:07 PM
A bit confused here as when I received my first shot, they told me when I needed to come back; in essence, made the second appointment for me.  Were you able to make it at the best time/date (thinking best effective)?

PD
Hi PD - they said that they would contact me when the time came and they have, although a bit earlier than expected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 01:35:13 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 27, 2021, 10:25:14 AM
Don't forget to take your vaccine certificate from the first dose.
Thanks - I will do - it's with my mobile phone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 01:35:45 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 27, 2021, 11:15:10 AM
Good!

Thank you!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on April 27, 2021, 03:07:34 PM

     Massachusetts numbers are getting better. Only 4 deaths today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 27, 2021, 11:25:34 PM
Quote from: drogulus on April 27, 2021, 03:07:34 PM
     Massachusetts numbers are getting better. Only 4 deaths today.
Great news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on April 28, 2021, 07:42:56 AM
Covid crises in India reaching epic proportions. Reports of two sometimes three to a hospital bed for those lucky enough to get in. Harrowing scenes on news of people dying in cars as being frantically driven by family members in search of oxygen supplies. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2021, 08:23:48 AM
Quote from: Irons on April 28, 2021, 07:42:56 AM
Covid crises in India reaching epic proportions. Reports of two sometimes three to a hospital bed for those lucky enough to get in. Harrowing scenes on news of people dying in cars as being frantically driven by family members in search of oxygen supplies.
That's horrible!

Ran across this article today.  A school in Florida is banning teachers and other staff from getting the Covid vaccine due to fears that they could somehow or another spread something to/harm the students!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56905752

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on April 28, 2021, 08:47:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2021, 08:23:48 AM
That's horrible!

Ran across this article today.  A school in Florida is banning teachers and other staff from getting the Covid vaccine due to fears that they could somehow or another spread something to/harm the students!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56905752

PD

I hope the parents who are paying up to $30,000 per annum to have their children taught in a school run by an imbecile vote with their feet (or wallets).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on April 28, 2021, 08:48:13 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2021, 08:23:48 AM


A school in Florida is banning teachers and other staff from getting the Covid vaccine due to fears that they could somehow or another spread something to/harm the students!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56905752

PD

Huh?!  That defies logic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 28, 2021, 09:39:17 AM
Quote from: Biffo on April 28, 2021, 08:47:30 AM
I hope the parents who are paying up to $30,000 per annum to have their children taught in a school run by an imbecile vote with their feet (or wallets).

Quote from: OrchestralNut on April 28, 2021, 08:48:13 AM
Huh?!  That defies logic.

I know!  They're cuckoo!  ???

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 28, 2021, 01:41:15 PM
The fact that children are the least likely to be affected by Covid apparently hasn't entered their heads.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 28, 2021, 02:30:00 PM
Quote from: Holden on April 28, 2021, 01:41:15 PM
The fact that children are the least likely to be affected by Covid apparently hasn't entered their heads.

When children contract the disease -and they do, it tends to run a subclinical course, but the children are still contagious, so it is a good thing when the staff of the school is vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 28, 2021, 02:44:07 PM
Also, the virus seems to target younger people increasingly, and new information regarding long-term effects (a survey presented in Nature these days) tells of those as being much too underestimated until now, even among those very mildly affected - that being another reason for more comprehensive vaccine programs in the future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2021, 05:05:36 AM
And, think about this:  by their line of thinking, if (and hopefully they have) the parents received their covid shots, then they could have already (in some way or another) negatively impacted their own child's health.  ::) Oh, brother!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2021, 07:58:45 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on April 29, 2021, 06:04:43 AM
Had 2nd AZ jab yesterday. No noticeable effects.
Huzzah!  :)

By the way, I like your Beaker avatar.  Do you work in the sciences?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 29, 2021, 09:26:14 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on April 29, 2021, 08:24:02 AM
No, it was more the uncannily similar appearance. ;)
:laugh: Well, 'he' is cute!  ;)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on April 29, 2021, 01:11:40 PM
Went to my GP yesterday and during the visit he said "Do you know you are eligible for a Covid Shot?" Apparently I qualify on two grounds. First, I had a triple bypass in 2013 and secondly I was treated for prostate cancer in 2019.

I'm booked in for jab 1 on May 22.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 30, 2021, 03:57:13 AM
Quote from: Holden on April 29, 2021, 01:11:40 PM
Went to my GP yesterday and during the visit he said "Do you know you are eligible for a Covid Shot?" Apparently I qualify on two grounds. First, I had a triple bypass in 2013 and secondly I was treated for prostate cancer in 2019.

I'm booked in for jab 1 on May 22.
Wow!  So sorry to hear of your health issues!  Hope that you're in much better health now?  In any event, hope that all goes smoothly!  My second jab is coming up in a few weeks.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on April 30, 2021, 11:59:24 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56922517

A Kenyan doctor who became a vociferous opponent of the Covid-19 vaccine has succumbed to the virus, weeks after saying the jab was "totally unnecessary".

Dr Stephen Karanja, chairman of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, advocated steam inhalation and hydroxychloroquine tablets.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 30, 2021, 12:29:11 PM
Quote from: T. D. on April 30, 2021, 11:59:24 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56922517

A Kenyan doctor who became a vociferous opponent of the Covid-19 vaccine has succumbed to the virus, weeks after saying the jab was "totally unnecessary".

Dr Stephen Karanja, chairman of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, advocated steam inhalation and hydroxychloroquine tablets.

He seems to have been against a number of different things. Strange that these kooks' obsessions develop in clusters... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 30, 2021, 01:09:10 PM
I suppose it's only a matter of time for what we're seeing in India now happens in Africa.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on April 30, 2021, 02:37:45 PM
Quote from: T. D. on April 30, 2021, 11:59:24 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56922517

A Kenyan doctor who became a vociferous opponent of the Covid-19 vaccine has succumbed to the virus, weeks after saying the jab was "totally unnecessary".
If you're around sick people all day, it's probably a good idea. Weird for a doctor to lack that kind of insight.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 01, 2021, 12:42:13 AM
Had my second jab (Oxford/AZ) at 8.10 this morning. I felt a bit spaced-out and dopey for a few minutes afterwards (but, as I've mentioned before, my wife tells me that that is my normal state) and was not allowed to drive for 15 minutes. Feel fine now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on May 01, 2021, 01:50:48 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 01, 2021, 12:42:13 AM
Had my second jab (Oxford/AZ) at 8.10 this morning. I felt a bit spaced-out and dopey for a few minutes afterwards (but, as I've mentioned before, my wife tells me that that is my normal state) and was not allowed to drive for 15 minutes. Feel fine now.

I am happy to hear that Jeffrey, I will get mine in 7 weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 01, 2021, 01:57:22 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 01, 2021, 12:42:13 AM
Had my second jab (Oxford/AZ) at 8.10 this morning. I felt a bit spaced-out and dopey for a few minutes afterwards (but, as I've mentioned before, my wife tells me that that is my normal state) and was not allowed to drive for 15 minutes. Feel fine now.

That's good Jeffrey!  $:)

They are starting to vaccinate 50-54 years olds in Helsinki soon. Starting next Monday this age group can reserve appointments. So, my turn is coming...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 01, 2021, 02:50:48 AM
Thank you Harry and 71 dB
Your turns soon  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on May 01, 2021, 03:23:33 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 30, 2021, 03:57:13 AM
Wow!  So sorry to hear of your health issues!  Hope that you're in much better health now?  In any event, hope that all goes smoothly!  My second jab is coming up in a few weeks.

PD

Thanks for your kind words. My cancer is in remission (PSA levels now below 1) and while I know that my heart issues will return I now know what to look out for.

I'm confident about the Astrazeneca jab doing the job and I'll leave the second shot longer than recommended. To be blunt, I've never worried about Covid 19 affecting me and for all I know I might have had it already and was asymptomatic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on May 02, 2021, 12:36:29 AM
Up for my 2nd Pfizer shot in 2 weeks. My 5 years younger wife is 1 week after me in the schedule. 756 Covid deaths in  Norway so far, I think we will mange to stay under 800 total.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2021, 10:14:51 AM
Quote from: T. D. on April 30, 2021, 11:59:24 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56922517

A Kenyan doctor who became a vociferous opponent of the Covid-19 vaccine has succumbed to the virus, weeks after saying the jab was "totally unnecessary".

Dr Stephen Karanja, chairman of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, advocated steam inhalation and hydroxychloroquine tablets.

One wonders how many members of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association may likewise be mere quacks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2021, 10:15:29 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on May 01, 2021, 12:42:13 AM
Had my second jab (Oxford/AZ) at 8.10 this morning. I felt a bit spaced-out and dopey for a few minutes afterwards (but, as I've mentioned before, my wife tells me that that is my normal state) and was not allowed to drive for 15 minutes. Feel fine now.

Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 02, 2021, 10:09:18 PM
I'm getting my first jab next Saturday, May 8 at 12:50 pm.

Quote from: The new erato on May 02, 2021, 12:36:29 AM
Up for my 2nd Pfizer shot in 2 weeks. My 5 years younger wife is 1 week after me in the schedule.

Nice.  0:)

Quote from: The new erato on May 02, 2021, 12:36:29 AM
756 Covid deaths in  Norway so far, I think we will manage to stay under 800 total.

914 deaths in Finland.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2021, 08:09:02 AM
Denmark is now probably the most restrictive country in the world as regards vaccines. In spite of the very small amount of registered problems, the J&J (8 mio doses had been ordered) was abolished today, and the AZ was already out since long, though now with the option for people to choose those two voluntarily, from some time in May. Only Pfizer and Moderna officially approved.

As a result, further delays. For me personally, apparently a vaccine before July 1st now. Can't say I enjoy waiting. I'll probably stick to the offcially approved ones, since the others might-might result in some problems with local vaccine passes etc. (??).

Situation here still stable in spite of the partial opening up. DK approaching 2500 fatalities, but now only 0 to 4 per day. That's a main reason for the vaccine abolishings. Sweden, who has seen no economical benefits compared to the other Nordic countries, is past 14,000 fatalities. I won't be going there at least until mid-2022.

BTW, experts pointing to that only an effective global vaccination programme will be able to finish the pandemic and virus spreading. So far, 86% of vaccines have been distributed to countries with a relatively high standard of living.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 03, 2021, 08:21:10 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 02, 2021, 10:09:18 PM
I'm getting my first jab next Saturday, May 8 at 12:50 pm.

Nice.  0:)

914 deaths in Finland.

Congrats from here, that's nice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 03, 2021, 10:01:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 03, 2021, 08:21:10 AM
Congrats from here, that's nice.

Thanks! I assume you refer to my first jab rather than the 915 (today's updated figure) deaths... 0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 03, 2021, 10:24:50 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 03, 2021, 08:09:02 AM
Denmark is now probably the most restrictive country in the world as regards vaccines. In spite of the very small amount of registered problems, the J&J (8 mio doses had been ordered) was abolished today, and the AZ was already out since long, though now with the option for people to choose those two voluntarily, from some time in May. Only Pfizer and Moderna officially approved.

As a result, further delays. For me personally, apparently a vaccine before July 1st now. Can't say I enjoy waiting. I'll probably stick to the offcially approved ones, since the others might-might result in some problems with local vaccine passes etc. (??).

Situation here still stable in spite of the partial opening up. DK approaching 2500 fatalities, but now only 0 to 4 per day. That's a main reason for the vaccine abolishings. Sweden, who has seen no economical benefits compared to the other Nordic countries, is past 14,000 fatalities. I won't be going there at least until mid-2022.

BTW, experts pointing to that only a effective global vaccinination programme will be able to finish the pandemic and virus spreading. So far, 86% of vaccines have been distributed to countries with a relatively high standard of living.
So sorry to hear of the delays in getting vaccinated in Denmark.  I'm due to get my second shot on or around the 15th of this month (Moderna).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2021, 12:21:03 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 02, 2021, 10:09:18 PM
I'm getting my first jab next Saturday, May 8 at 12:50 pm.

Nice.  0:)

914 deaths in Finland.

Poju, did you check your PMs?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 03, 2021, 03:30:00 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 03, 2021, 12:21:03 PM
Poju, did you check your PMs?

Yes, thank you Karl. As I wrote in the "zoom" thread I have never zoomed...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on May 06, 2021, 05:17:01 AM
Had my first jab (Pfizer) this morning at 10:30. No side effects so far.
I'll get the second one in 3 weeks.
8) 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2021, 06:07:01 AM
Quote from: GioCar on May 06, 2021, 05:17:01 AM
Had my first jab (Pfizer) this morning at 10:30. No side effects so far.
I'll get the second one in 3 weeks.
8) 

Very good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2021, 04:13:28 PM
Europe's vaccine campaign is accelerating. It expects to match the U.S. by July. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-covid-vaccine/2021/05/06/ecc4829a-ada5-11eb-82c1-896aca955bb9_story.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 06, 2021, 04:20:13 PM
Quote from: GioCar on May 06, 2021, 05:17:01 AM
Had my first jab (Pfizer) this morning at 10:30. No side effects so far.
I'll get the second one in 3 weeks.
8)

I had my second Pfizer shot yesterday.  So far the only physical side effect is a sore arm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2021, 04:28:48 PM
Quote from: Daverz on May 06, 2021, 04:20:13 PM
I had my second Pfizer shot yesterday.  So far the only physical side effect is a sore arm.

Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on May 07, 2021, 02:37:09 AM
Quote from: Daverz on May 06, 2021, 04:20:13 PM
I had my second Pfizer shot yesterday.  So far the only physical side effect is a sore arm.

The same for me. I spent last night with a sore arm, now it's almost over.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 07, 2021, 04:15:29 AM
Quote from: GioCar on May 07, 2021, 02:37:09 AM
The same for me. I spent last night with a sore arm, now it's almost over.

Congratulations with the vaccine done!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on May 07, 2021, 12:11:54 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 07, 2021, 04:15:29 AM
Congratulations with the vaccine done!

Tak  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 08, 2021, 02:45:09 AM
Just got my first jab of Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty. So far so good... ...I feel maybe a little burning in the arm, but it is very mild (an hour after the jab). I also feel a little "dizzy" maybe? We'll see what happens in the next 48 hours or so... ...the second jab will be July 31st (Finland uses 3 months between jabs strategy).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 08, 2021, 06:30:42 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 08, 2021, 02:45:09 AM
Just got my first jab of Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty. So far so good... ...I feel maybe a little burning in the arm, but it is very mild (an hour after the jab). I also feel a little "dizzy" maybe? We'll see what happens in the next 48 hours or so... ...the second jab will be July 31st (Finland uses 3 months between jabs strategy).

I suppose it's only otherwise healthy people, who can wait that long.

BTW congrats with the first jab.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 08, 2021, 10:15:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 08, 2021, 06:30:42 AM
I suppose it's only otherwise healthy people, who can wait that long.

BTW congrats with the first jab.  :)

Thanks!  0:)

Well, the risks groups and elderly people have been almost completely vaccinated. My father, 82, gets his 2nd jab next week (3 months after the first one in February. Now they started giving vaccines to 50-54 year olds (I'm 50) and next week 45-49 (my sister is 46) and so on.

The 3 months between jabs strategy was chosen, because in the beginning (January-March) there was lack of vaccines so pushing the 2nd jab further in to the future made it possible to give more people their first jab, which already gives pretty good protection against serious illness caused by Covid-19. Now we are getting more vaccines, but the strategy is ongoing. About 34 % of Finns have got the first jab, but less than 4 % the 2nd one, althou the amount of the 2nd jabs will accelerate now that elderly people are getting their 2nd jab and so on... ...70 % coverage in the first jab is estimated to give proper group immunity* and with current rate it will be reached by mid July.

* Assuming variants that can counter the vaccines do not emerge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on May 08, 2021, 02:01:11 PM
I got my first dose (Pfizer) near the end of February, though I had to drive to a town two hours away to get it. My second shot, in mid-March, was about an hour away. ::)

But I was happy to get them. My wife is high-risk (she has severe asthma), and her parents live with us and of course at their ages (he's 82, she's 80) they're also high-risk. We've all been fully vaccinated now.

I was fortunate to experience no side effects from the shots at all, other than a slightly sore arm for a couple of days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on May 10, 2021, 10:47:56 PM
First Pfizer jab a few hours ago.

Which is jumping the queue a bit here, as we are still finishing all front line workers, at risk persons and not long started on the more general elderly population. But there's been a pop-up vaccination sit go up across the street from my work and at the end of each day if they've got vials they need to use up they've been coming over and taking as many of us as needed and I was part of today's muster.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on May 11, 2021, 01:01:36 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 10, 2021, 10:47:56 PM
First Pfizer jab a few hours ago.

Which is jumping the queue a bit here, as we are still finishing all front line workers, at risk persons and not long started on the more general elderly population. But there's been a pop-up vaccination sit go up across the street from my work and at the end of each day if they've got vials they need to use up they've been coming over and taking as many of us as needed and I was part of today's muster.

That sounds like initiative - something missing in so many ways today. Pleased to see it in operation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: GioCar on May 11, 2021, 04:13:59 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on May 10, 2021, 10:47:56 PM
First Pfizer jab a few hours ago.

Very good Simon!

Quote
Which is jumping the queue a bit here, as we are still finishing all front line workers, at risk persons and not long started on the more general elderly population. But there's been a pop-up vaccination sit go up across the street from my work and at the end of each day if they've got vials they need to use up they've been coming over and taking as many of us as needed and I was part of today's muster.

We have something similar which has been proving to be quite effective, particularly in the south of the country. There many people are refusing to take AZ (people cannot choose before, you know which vaccin on the spot, just after  the medical anamnesis) so many AZ doses are available at the end of the day and other people can take advantage of that. Some small town are setting up a sort of "vaccine day" for all who want to anticipate their vaccination. Some are successful, some less, but generally speaking it works.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 11, 2021, 08:34:42 PM
Finally got the vaccine notice via mail, as an extra birthday present, a bit earlier than I'd expected lately ... will be having the first Pfizer jab on next Wednesday, the 19th of May, and the second Pfizer on June 25th. I'm also trying some daily waiting list for surplus vaccines, in case such an extra appointment option turns up.

Currently they think that the whole Danish population will have had vaccines in August, there's been some delays especially for younger people ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 11, 2021, 11:04:43 PM
Vaccine production has been ramped up and the expectation is that the population of large parts of Europa will be vaccinated over summer.  Which might be a bit late for the vacation industry in Southern Europe. And the EU "vaccination passport" will only be ready some time in August. I'm expecting travel restrictions and some chaos in the summer season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on May 16, 2021, 12:07:46 PM
https://twitter.com/jamesward73/status/1393932001271554049?s=21

Some sobering modelling on the impact of the India variant B.1.617.2. 

Are there professional ethics objections to vaccinating teenagers, because they don't personally benefit?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 16, 2021, 12:56:22 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 11, 2021, 08:34:42 PM
Finally got the vaccine notice via mail, as an extra birthday present, a bit earlier than I'd expected lately ... will be having the first Pfizer jab on next Wednesday, the 19th of May, and the second Pfizer on June 25th. I'm also trying some daily waiting list for surplus vaccines, in case such an extra appointment option turns up.

Currently they think that the whole Danish population will have had vaccines in August, there's been some delays especially for younger people ...
Happy to hear that you will be getting your first shot soon!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 16, 2021, 07:42:14 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 16, 2021, 12:56:22 PM
Happy to hear that you will be getting your first shot soon!  :)

PD

Thank you, I'm looking forward to this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 17, 2021, 02:25:50 AM
I had my second shot yesterday.  Felt fine though tired afterword; I suspect that was due to a busy day yesterday including getting up very early and working outside for a few hours.  Arm is very sore though (roughly in a softball-size area) were they jabbed me.  I had hoped to get more gardening done today but may give it a pass.

In any event, as I told a friend of mine, "In two weeks I'll be a human".  ;)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 17, 2021, 04:03:02 AM
Congratulations! Some tiredness is quite often reported after the second shot, I think, but the exact reasons might vary individually, of course. Can't tell from a personal experience yet, of course, but am about to find out more about side-effects, if there will be any ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 18, 2021, 03:21:50 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 17, 2021, 04:03:02 AM
Congratulations! Some tiredness is quite often reported after the second shot, I think, but the exact reasons might vary individually, of course. Can't tell from a personal experience yet, of course, but am about to find out more about side-effects, if there will be any ...
I don't know much about the Pfizer vaccine other than that it's a 2-doser.

I think that I was just tuckered out Sunday....between getting up between 4 and 5 (forget exactly when) and working out in the garden for several hours, etc. (and also no longer being a spring chicken  ;) ).

Arm is feeling much better today.  A tiny bit sore but not anything like what I was feeling yesterday!  This was the same reaction that I had the first time.  At least with the Moderna, they inject it into the muscle which is also why they tell you not to try and lift anything very heavy that day--so that you don't tear/damage the muscle further.

Best of luck to you!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 18, 2021, 03:31:23 AM
Thank you, and good to hear that you're thoroughly improving, and quickly ... I plan to cycle down there to the injection place (about 11 km), but depending on what they recommend, I might take the train back afterwards, to avoid any biking, which will however be at a leisurely pace :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 18, 2021, 11:34:14 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 18, 2021, 03:21:50 AM
I don't know much about the Pfizer vaccine other than that it's a 2-doser.

I think that I was just tuckered out Sunday....between getting up between 4 and 5 (forget exactly when) and working out in the garden for several hours, etc. (and also no longer being a spring chicken  ;) ).

Arm is feeling much better today.  A tiny bit sore but not anything like what I was feeling yesterday!  This was the same reaction that I had the first time.  At least with the Moderna, they inject it into the muscle which is also why they tell you not to try and lift anything very heavy that day--so that you don't tear/damage the muscle further.

Best of luck to you!

PD

Good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 18, 2021, 11:34:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 16, 2021, 07:42:14 PM
Thank you, I'm looking forward to this.

Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 20, 2021, 12:57:00 PM
Trust the science, but maybe not the humans: Retailers, patrons ponder lifting of Mass. restrictions. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/20/business/trust-science-maybe-not-humans-retailers-patrons-ponder-lifting-mass-restrictions/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 20, 2021, 01:00:20 PM
Not My Party: Stop Trying to Make Mask Wars a Thing. (https://thebulwark.com/not-my-party-stop-trying-to-make-mask-wars-a-thing/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on May 20, 2021, 09:24:01 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 18, 2021, 03:21:50 AM
I don't know much about the Pfizer vaccine other than that it's a 2-doser.

Oh, this reminds me that it's been more than 2 weeks since my second dose, so I am now "fully" vaccinated.

I'm probably still going to wear a mask in some public situations. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on May 20, 2021, 11:17:20 PM
My first jab is at 2:30 pm tomorrow. It's astrazeneca and I have confidence that I won't suffer any side affects. I let you all know how it goes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on May 21, 2021, 01:38:58 AM
Quote from: Holden on May 20, 2021, 11:17:20 PM
My first jab is at 2:30 pm tomorrow. It's astrazeneca and I have confidence that I won't suffer any side affects. I let you all know how it goes.
I'm happy for you. It will go well and as vaccinated, even with dose 1, life will be less complicated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 21, 2021, 01:54:10 AM
Had no real side-effects of the 1st Pfizer two days ago.

They're now changing the rules here in DK, so that we get a 'corona pass', suitable for various circumstances, already two weeks after the 1st shot, not after the 2nd. Including for me.

Virus slightly increasing here due to the opening up. Very few fatalities.

Vaccination programme expected to be done in late summer.

There'll be a general EU pass from late June, the pass will be voted for on a summit in a couple of days. Details still hazy, though. Travelling probably easier etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 21, 2021, 06:51:44 AM
Quote from: Daverz on May 20, 2021, 09:24:01 PM
Oh, this reminds me that it's been more than 2 weeks since my second dose, so I am now "fully" vaccinated.

I'm probably still going to wear a mask in some public situations.
Congrats!  And, yes, last I heard anyway, they are still recommending masks in some situations (like when on public transport).

PD
Quote from: Holden on May 20, 2021, 11:17:20 PM
My first jab is at 2:30 pm tomorrow. It's astrazeneca and I have confidence that I won't suffer any side affects. I let you all know how it goes.

Hope all goes (went?) well.

Quote from: MusicTurner on May 21, 2021, 01:54:10 AM

Had no real side-effects of the 1st Pfizer two days ago.

They're now changing the rules here in DK, so that we get a 'corona pass', suitable for various circumstances, already two weeks after the 1st shot, not after the 2nd. Including for me.

Virus slightly increasing here due to the opening up. Very few fatalities.

Vaccination programme expected to be done in late summer.

There'll be a general EU pass from late June, the pass will be voted for on a summit in a couple of days. Details still hazy, though. Travelling probably easier etc.
Interesting!  I would have thought that you would get something only after the second shot though?  I received a card with the date and the name of the shot and where it was administered (as well as my name) that I received.  I'm wondering whether or not businesses will ask to look at it...at the moment, there are not any consistent rules.

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 21, 2021, 07:09:09 AM
It's because the effect is considered so good even after the 1st shot; I've read about 92%. That first pass is however only valid for 42 days, since you're expected to take the 2nd shot too, and then get a more long-lasting pass.

Almost everyone here have their passes on their phone; you also show some ID as well, for further verification. Everyone here has a social security number and an account at a digital ID system, where you can check, manage and present such information, use it to get medicine from all dealers, manage taxes, use bank accounts, contact doctors, etc. It's a more comprehensive system than in most countries, but simple to use, and there are strict rules on who's allowed to see what and when. You use several layers of codes to get access to your account, the last step is always a new code, say taken from a list of random numbers that you have received. But as for the pass, you can just keep a file or link on the phone.

They've made a special app too for the corona pass occasion.

I've used my passes (based on tests, valid only for a short time), at museums, accommodation & restaurants ... any traveling abroad is not something I'll embark on yet, I still consider it too risky; yet some regions within the EU are now not warned against any longer ...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 21, 2021, 07:23:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 21, 2021, 07:09:09 AM
It's because the effect is considered so good even after the 1st shot. I've read about 92%. That first pass is however only valid for 42 days, since you're expected to take the 2nd shot too, and then get a more long-lasting pass.

Almost everyone here have their passes on their phone; you also show some ID as well, for further verification. Everyone here has a social security number and an account at a digital ID system, where you can check, manage and present such information, use it to get medicine from all dealers, manage taxes, use bank accounts, contact doctors, etc. It's a more comprehensive system than in most countries, but simple to use, and there are strict rules on who's allowed to see what and when. You use several layers of codes to get accesd to your account, the last step is always a new code, say taken from a list of accidental numbers you receive.

They've made a special app too for the corona pass occasion.

I've used my passes (based on tests, valid only for a short time), at museums, accomodation & restaurants ... any traveling abroad is not something I'll embark on yet, I still consider it too risky; some regions within the EU are now not warned against any longer ...
Thank you for the info.  It's quite interesting to read how different countries are dealing with this (and their infrastructure and political and social systems and networks).  I should also take a photo of my card and keep it on my phone.  They are suggesting NOT to laminate them in case they suggest getting a booster shot in the future.  It's just a paper card though.  I keep it in my purse (too big for my wallet).  Perhaps I'll get a special pouch to protect it?  :-\

Have all of the places that you've visited within Denmark asked to see it consistently?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on May 22, 2021, 04:09:36 PM
Had jab #1 yesterday about 20 hours ago at my medical centre and so far no side effects at all. The vaccinators mentioned the possibility of a headache, some very mild flu like symptoms and a sore arm but none of this has happened and after nearly a day is probably unlikely. Final jab due on August 14 which is twelve weeks away.

I'm still amazed at the ignorance of some people. While I was waiting for the obligatory 15 minutes one woman filling out her form said that her husband recommended she take a photo of the batch number. I just couldn't help myself and said "..and what good will that do?" She couldn't tell me and I then asked if he was going to get the jab. "Not at this point." she replied. "Well, that proves one thing," I responded "you've obviously got a damn sight more brains than he has!" The media has so much to answer for with the way they've reported the pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 22, 2021, 07:50:00 PM
Quote from: Daverz on May 20, 2021, 09:24:01 PM
Oh, this reminds me that it's been more than 2 weeks since my second dose, so I am now "fully" vaccinated.

I'm probably still going to wear a mask in some public situations. 

I certainly do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 22, 2021, 07:50:32 PM
Quote from: Holden on May 20, 2021, 11:17:20 PM
My first jab is at 2:30 pm tomorrow. It's astrazeneca and I have confidence that I won't suffer any side affects. I let you all know how it goes.

Very good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 23, 2021, 12:08:54 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 21, 2021, 07:23:09 AM
Thank you for the info.  It's quite interesting to read how different countries are dealing with this (and their infrastructure and political and social systems and networks).  I should also take a photo of my card and keep it on my phone.  They are suggesting NOT to laminate them in case they suggest getting a booster shot in the future.  It's just a paper card though.  I keep it in my purse (too big for my wallet).  Perhaps I'll get a special pouch to protect it?  :-\

Have all of the places that you've visited within Denmark asked to see it consistently?

PD

There are some American expats here producing often interesting (for us) videos about experiencing DK and the US, including a couple of reports about the relatively massive and centralized digitalization here, compared to the US (Travelin' Young you-tube channel, I often check them out, they're nice people as well. They tend to be very polite towards their new country of residence, though).

The pass hasn't been here for that long, about a couple of months, and it's currently a time with a much less outgoing life, but I've simply shown it + an ID every time I knew it was needed, so staff just accepted it. There was a television report showing that a lot of restaurants were rather loose in their policies. For me it has been in use maybe 5 times only, since you don't need it for shopping or office visits etc., it's for eating out, museums, accommodation, and a bit of other stuff. I am still abstaining from a lot of activities, surely for about 8 days more, after that, the first jab should be working quite well, and I'll have my long-lasting pass. But they say that the virus might be only really reduced from around the 1st of July, that it may still grow in June. So still a lot of reasons for sensible precautions. A somewhat younger colleague of mine just contracted it, but I don't know the exact circumstances, her mail was just objective and rational, she expected to be able to return working in a bit more than a week from now.

We're close to 6 mio people, but yesterday we reached a total of 50 mio tests so far ... for me, it's been perhaps 10.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2021, 02:48:50 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 23, 2021, 12:08:54 AM
There are some American expats here producing often interesting (for us) videos about experiencing DK and the US, including a couple of reports about the relatively massive and centralized digitalization here, compared to the US (Travelin' Young you-tube channel, I often check them out, they're nice people as well. They tend to be very polite towards their new country of residence, though).

The pass hasn't been here for that long, about a couple of months, and it's currently a time with a much less outgoing life, but I've simply shown it + an ID every time I knew it was needed, so staff just accepted it. There was a television report showing that a lot of restaurants were rather loose in their policies. For me it has been in use maybe 5 times only, since you don't need it for shopping or office visits etc., it's for eating out, museums, accommodation, and a bit of other stuff. I am still abstaining from a lot of activities, surely for about 8 days more, after that, the first jab should be working quite well, and I'll have my long-lasting pass. But they say that the virus might be only really reduced from around the 1st of July, that it may still grow in June. So still a lot of reasons for sensible precautions. A somewhat younger colleague of mine just contracted it, but I don't know the exact circumstances, her mail was just objective and rational, she expected to be able to return working in a bit more than a week from now.

We're close to 6 mio people, but yesterday we reached a total of 50 mio tests so far ... for me, it's been perhaps 10.
I'll have to check and see how things have changed lately in my town.  Rather confusing as there have been state guidelines and rules, but sometimes the town ones are stricter.  Today is day 7 after my second round (I started counting the day after my vaccine--that being a Sunday).  Like you, personally, I error on the side of caution.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on May 23, 2021, 04:28:11 AM
Quote from: Holden on May 22, 2021, 04:09:36 PM
Had jab #1 yesterday about 20 hours ago at my medical centre and so far no side effects at all. The vaccinators mentioned the possibility of a headache, some very mild flu like symptoms and a sore arm but none of this has happened and after nearly a day is probably unlikely. Final jab due on August 14 which is twelve weeks away.

I'm still amazed at the ignorance of some people. While I was waiting for the obligatory 15 minutes one woman filling out her form said that her husband recommended she take a photo of the batch number. I just couldn't help myself and said "..and what good will that do?" She couldn't tell me and I then asked if he was going to get the jab. "Not at this point." she replied. "Well, that proves one thing," I responded "you've obviously got a damn sight more brains than he has!" The media has so much to answer for with the way they've reported the pandemic.

I can't answer that but here in the UK I was given a card and the batch number was written on it by the nurse (on both occasions).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2021, 06:17:14 AM
Quote from: Biffo on May 23, 2021, 04:28:11 AM
I can't answer that but here in the UK I was given a card and the batch number was written on it by the nurse (on both occasions).
Same thing here in the US.  I would suspect that it has something to do with, should people be having issues with the vaccine, they could use this to trace to see if there's an issue with most of the people who were given that batch?  Just a guess!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 23, 2021, 07:40:51 AM
Something to add to the "keep wearing masks/vaccine not a panacea" pile.

My father (who'll be 89 next month) lives in Boston (Belmont, to be precise) with his 2 younger brothers (mid to late 70s). Also living with them is c 45 yo nephew (by marriage) of one uncle.  Between winter weather and pandemic, they've only gone out of the house for necessary things like groceries and (in the case of the nephew) work.  Masks are worn, etc. Everyone has been fully vaccinated, in my father's case almost 3 months ago.

One uncle has a history of neurological problems and repeated pneumonia.  Three days ago, realizing he was incoherent and unable to stand w/o help, they took him to the hospital, assuming he had suffered a stroke or similar.  Turned out he has COVID with possible heart damage from the virus.
He is still hospitalized but (according to my father) improving.
My other uncle then got tested and found he is Covid positive albeit w/o symptoms. My father is waiting to get tested (for some reason the earliest appointment for a test he can make is middle of this week) but assumes he has it w/o symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 23, 2021, 09:49:37 AM
Wow, that's one piece of bad luck. I wish your dad and other relatives all the best.

Yes, masks are for everyday use, not just for carnival... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 23, 2021, 10:06:23 AM
Quote from: André on May 23, 2021, 09:49:37 AM
I wish your dad and other relatives all the best.

+ 1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 23, 2021, 10:15:37 AM
Quote from: André on May 23, 2021, 09:49:37 AM
Wow, that's one piece of bad luck. I wish your dad and other relatives all the best.


+2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2021, 10:24:26 AM
Quote from: JBS on May 23, 2021, 07:40:51 AM
Something to add to the "keep wearing masks/vaccine not a panacea" pile.

My father (who'll be 89 next month) lives in Boston (Belmont, to be precise) with his 2 younger brothers (mid to late 70s). Also living with them is c 45 yo nephew (by marriage) of one uncle.  Between winter weather and pandemic, they've only gone out of the house for necessary things like groceries and (in the case of the nephew) work.  Masks are worn, etc. Everyone has been fully vaccinated, in my father's case almost 3 months ago.

One uncle has a history of neurological problems and repeated pneumonia.  Three days ago, realizing he was incoherent and unable to stand w/o help, they took him to the hospital, assuming he had suffered a stroke or similar.  Turned out he has COVID with possible heart damage from the virus.
He is still hospitalized but (according to my father) improving.
My other uncle then got tested and found he is Covid positive albeit w/o symptoms. My father is waiting to get tested (for some reason the earliest appointment for a test he can make is middle of this week) but assumes he has it w/o symptoms.
I'm so sorry to hear of this!  Also, how is your nephew doing?  Has he been tested?  And will he have to self-quarantine with them?  :(  I hope that everyone gets better and soon.

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 23, 2021, 12:05:49 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2021, 10:24:26 AM
I'm so sorry to hear of this!  Also, how is your nephew doing?  Has he been tested?  And will he have to self-quarantine with them?  :(  I hope that everyone gets better and soon.

All the best,

PD

Thanks for all the good wishes.
To be clear, the "nephew" is not directly related to me. He is the son of the sister of my uncle's late wife. My father didn't mention him, so I have no idea of what his status is at the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 23, 2021, 12:57:21 PM
Quote from: JBS on May 23, 2021, 12:05:49 PM
Thanks for all the good wishes.
To be clear, the "nephew" is not directly related to me. He is the son of the sister of my uncle's late wife. My father didn't mention him, so I have no idea of what his status is at the moment.
In any event, please keep us updated (presuming that they are all comfortable with it).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 25, 2021, 01:51:24 PM
I attended my first live musical event since the lockdown, Sunday
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 25, 2021, 01:52:35 PM
In related news:

50 percent of US adults are now fully vaccinated against COVID-19, according to CDC data (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/25/nation/us-tuesday-hit-50-percent-us-adults-fully-vaccinated-against-covid-19-white-house-says/?p1=SectionFront_Feed_ContentQuery)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 26, 2021, 01:59:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 25, 2021, 01:51:24 PM
I attended my first live musical event since the lockdown, Sunday
Yippee!  Were there many people there Karl?  And were people social distancing, etc.?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 26, 2021, 03:46:19 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 25, 2021, 01:52:35 PM
In related news:

50 percent of US adults are now fully vaccinated against COVID-19, according to CDC data (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/25/nation/us-tuesday-hit-50-percent-us-adults-fully-vaccinated-against-covid-19-white-house-says/?p1=SectionFront_Feed_ContentQuery)

The US has done good job*. Finland comes way behind:

First dose 42.1 %
Second dose 7.4 %

These are ref whole population, so among adults the numbers are a bit larger (maybe ~50 % / 9 %). Because Finland uses 12 weeks between doses-strategy, the second doses have just started (I won't be getting it until July 31) recently and that's why the number is so low at this point.

* However, the US might struggle getting much beyond this point as those not vaccinated are mostly anti-vaxxers.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 27, 2021, 03:31:58 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 26, 2021, 03:46:19 PM
The US has done good job*. Finland comes way behind:

First dose 42.1 %
Second dose 7.4 %

These are ref whole population, so among adults the numbers are a bit larger (maybe ~50 % / 9 %). Because Finland uses 12 weeks between doses-strategy, the second doses have just started (I won't be getting it until July 31) recently and that's why the number is so low at this point.

* However, the US might struggle getting much beyond this point as those not vaccinated are mostly anti-vaxxers.  :P
Quote from: 71 dB on May 26, 2021, 03:46:19 PM
The US has done good job*. Finland comes way behind:

First dose 42.1 %
Second dose 7.4 %

These are ref whole population, so among adults the numbers are a bit larger (maybe ~50 % / 9 %). Because Finland uses 12 weeks between doses-strategy, the second doses have just started (I won't be getting it until July 31) recently and that's why the number is so low at this point.

* However, the US might struggle getting much beyond this point as those not vaccinated are mostly anti-vaxxers.  :P
Interesting in terms of number of weeks between.  But is this just for a certain vaccine?  In the US, the pharmacies, etc. went by the CDC and the manufacturers' recs (I believe).  I would love a link to what you are saying as I can't pull up something to substantiate that.  Is it more do to availably of vaccines or?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 27, 2021, 06:13:04 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 26, 2021, 01:59:14 AM
Yippee!  Were there many people there Karl?  And were people social distancing, etc.?


I didn't note the headcount, but the musiciaNs and the concert series promoter were highly pleased.  Yes still distanced, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 27, 2021, 06:13:39 PM
Also: All coronavirus-related protocols, including social distancing, will be lifted at schools for the start of the 2021-22 academic year, and every school will be required to be back fully in person, state education officials told superintendents on Thursday.

School districts will not be allowed to offer remote learning as a standard learning model, according to the new guidance from the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 27, 2021, 06:15:07 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 26, 2021, 03:46:19 PM
The US has done good job*. Finland comes way behind:

First dose 42.1 %
Second dose 7.4 %

These are ref whole population, so among adults the numbers are a bit larger (maybe ~50 % / 9 %). Because Finland uses 12 weeks between doses-strategy, the second doses have just started (I won't be getting it until July 31) recently and that's why the number is so low at this point.

* However, the US might struggle getting much beyond this point as those not vaccinated are mostly anti-vaxxers.  :P

A combination of anti-vaxxers and MAGA-verse science denialists.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 28, 2021, 05:26:37 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 27, 2021, 03:31:58 PM
Interesting in terms of number of weeks between.  But is this just for a certain vaccine?  In the US, the pharmacies, etc. went by the CDC and the manufacturers' recs (I believe).  I would love a link to what you are saying as I can't pull up something to substantiate that.  Is it more do to availably of vaccines or?

PD

The US has been the envy of the World in regards of covid-19 vaccine availability. The EU made collective purchasing of vaccines and due to some incompetence the deals with vaccine manufacturers were not good. In the beginning of the year EU did not get all the vaccines it had ordered. Manufacturers prioritized other countries such as the US and Israel. So, in order to vaccinate at least once as many people as possible as soon as possible (especially the elderly people in the greatest danger) many European countries adapted UK model of 12 weeks between doses strategy.  A recent study suggests 12 weeks gap generates 3.5 times higher antibody response in elderly people.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2021/05/14/study-finds-12-week-gap-between-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-dose-generates-35-times-higher-antibody-response/?sh=4e8f3cd8a6a3

The availability of vaccines has improved since, but due to this 12 weeks thing European countries lag behind in 2nd doses. Finland uses mostly Pfizer. AstraZeneca was used, but it halted due to the blood cloth thing. The willingness to get vaccinated has increased in Finland: Now 95 % of Finns think positively about Covid-19 vaccines. Older people are more willing than younger people (because the risks of corona are more serious):

90 % want the vaccine.

Among people older than 60, 97 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among 45-59 years olds 94 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among 30–44 years olds 87 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among people younger than 30, 79 % are positive about getting vaccinated.

Reaching the hurd immunity (70 % vaccinated) should be easy. It just takes time. Sometime in July 70 % should have gotten at least their 1st dose.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 28, 2021, 05:56:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 27, 2021, 06:15:07 PM
A combination of anti-vaxxers and MAGA-verse science denialists.

Luckily we don't have many of those over here.  0:)

It looks like in regards of the 1st dose Finland will reach and even surpass the US in the summer, but in 2nd doseses Finland will need several months to surpass the US*.

*The US is very unevenly vaccinated. Some states (mostly blue) have reached almost hurd immunity while some others (mostly red) come far behind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 29, 2021, 10:41:31 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 28, 2021, 05:56:43 AM
Luckily we don't have many of those over here.  0:)

Hyvää, Suomi!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 29, 2021, 10:42:31 AM
'It's going to be pretty packed': COVID restrictions give way to full reopening at businesses this weekend (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/28/business/weekend-change-begins-saturday-covid-19-restrictions-give-way-full-reopening/?et_rid=899073679&s_campaign=todaysheadlines:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on May 29, 2021, 01:11:43 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on May 28, 2021, 05:26:37 AM
The US has been the envy of the World in regards of covid-19 vaccine availability. The EU made collective purchasing of vaccines and due to some incompetence the deals with vaccine manufacturers were not good. In the beginning of the year EU did not get all the vaccines it had ordered. Manufacturers prioritized other countries such as the US and Israel. So, in order to vaccinate at least once as many people as possible as soon as possible (especially the elderly people in the greatest danger) many European countries adapted UK model of 12 weeks between doses strategy.  A recent study suggests 12 weeks gap generates 3.5 times higher antibody response in elderly people.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2021/05/14/study-finds-12-week-gap-between-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-dose-generates-35-times-higher-antibody-response/?sh=4e8f3cd8a6a3

The availability of vaccines has improved since, but due to this 12 weeks thing European countries lag behind in 2nd doses. Finland uses mostly Pfizer. AstraZeneca was used, but it halted due to the blood cloth thing. The willingness to get vaccinated has increased in Finland: Now 95 % of Finns think positively about Covid-19 vaccines. Older people are more willing than younger people (because the risks of corona are more serious):

90 % want the vaccine.

Among people older than 60, 97 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among 45-59 years olds 94 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among 30–44 years olds 87 % are positive about getting vaccinated.
Among people younger than 30, 79 % are positive about getting vaccinated.

Reaching the hurd immunity (70 % vaccinated) should be easy. It just takes time. Sometime in July 70 % should have gotten at least their 1st dose.
Interesting.  I had known that Europe was having problems getting enough of the vaccines.  I did hear this news about a week or so ago.  Don't know whether or not you have?

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/17/997575473/u-s-to-ship-20-million-additional-covid-vaccine-doses-overseas

Hope that it helps various countries.  No idea how much is directed to where.

PD

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on May 29, 2021, 03:20:40 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 29, 2021, 10:41:31 AM
Hyvää, Suomi!

Thaaanks!  ;)

The double vowels and consonants of Finnish language can be difficult to foreigners, especially the correct pronunciation. You probably have seen phrases like "Hyvää päivää!" (Good day!), but the correct form is "Hyvä Suomi!" (Go Finland! or Well done Finland...) because "Hyvää" means actually "good something" and should be followed by the thing that is good such as day. "Hyvä" on the other hand means just "good", for example "Polkupyöräni on hyvä" (My bicycle is good).

If someone asks you "Mitä kuuluu?" (What's up?) you can answer "Kiitos, hyvää." (Thanks, things are good.)

Confusing? Don't worry Karl. It's a difficult and weird language. :D Thanks again for trying!

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on May 29, 2021, 01:11:43 PM
Interesting.  I had known that Europe was having problems getting enough of the vaccines.  I did hear this news about a week or so ago.  Don't know whether or not you have?

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/17/997575473/u-s-to-ship-20-million-additional-covid-vaccine-doses-overseas

Hope that it helps various countries.  No idea how much is directed to where.

PD

Europe is doing well compared to many other countries. The beginning was difficult, but things got better around April. Finland is vaccinating almost 0.5 % of its population every day. I have been aware of the vaccine donations. It is great that the US can donate vaccines to poorer countries. This is a global pandemic. The whole World needs to be vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on June 01, 2021, 07:04:30 PM
From the Brisbane Times, an interesting point of view expressed here that I would think applies to many other parts of the world. I don't agree with all of it but it carries a lot of truths.

OPINION
Politicians have spent decades dismantling almost the only solution to the pandemic

It surprises me that, though the nation's been watching anxiously for more than a year as our politicians struggle with the repeated failures of hotel quarantine and the consequent lockdowns, big and small, and now the delay in rolling out the vaccine, so few of us have managed to join the dots.

Some have been tempted to explain it in terms of Labor getting it wrong and the Libs getting it right – or vice versa – but that doesn't work. Nor does thinking the states always get it right and the feds get it wrong – or vice versa.

After the findings of the royal commission,  it is no surprise there have been so many COVID-related deaths in aged care.

The media love conflict, so we've been given an overdose of Labor versus Liberal and premiers versus Morrison & Co. But though we can use this to gratify our tribal allegiances, it doesn't explain why both parties and both levels of government have had their failures.

No, to me what stands out as the underlying cause of our difficulties – apart from human fallibility – is the way both sides of politics at both levels of government have spent the past few decades following the fashion for Smaller Government.

Both sides of politics have been pursuing the quest for smaller government ever since we let Ronald Reagan convince us that "government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem".

The smaller government project has had much success. We've privatised almost every formerly federal and state government-owned business. We've also managed to "outsource" the delivery of many government services formerly performed by public sector workers.

But the smaller government project has been less successful in reducing government spending. The best the pollies have done is contain the growth in spending by unceasing behind-the-scenes penny-pinching.

And here's the thing: pandemics and smaller government are a bad fit.

The urgent threat to life and limb presented by a pandemic isn't something you can leave market forces to fix. The response must come from government, using all the powers we have conferred on it – to lead, spend vast sums and, if necessary, compel our co-operation.

In a pandemic, governments aren't the problem, they're the answer. Pretty much the only answer. Only governments can close borders, insist people go into quarantine, order businesses to close and specify the limited circumstances in which we may leave our homes.

Only governments can afford to mobilise the health system, massively assist businesses and workers to keep alive while the economy's in lockdown, pay for mass testing and tracing, and flash so much money that the world's drug companies do what seemed impossible and come up with several safe and effective vaccines in just months.

But when you examine the glitches – the repeated failures of hotel quarantine, the need for more lockdowns, the delay in stopping community spread, and now the slowness of the rollout of vaccines – what you see is governments, federal and state, with a now deeply entrenched culture of doing everything on the cheap, of sacrificing quality, not quite able to rise to the occasion.

As we've learnt, a pandemic demands quick and effective action. But when you've spent years running down the capabilities of the public service – telling bureaucrats you don't need their advice on policy, just their obedience – quick and effective is what you don't get.

The feds have lost what little capacity they ever had to deliver programs on the ground. They have primary responsibility for quarantine and vaccination, but must rely on the states for execution. Then, since both sides are obsessed by cost-cutting, they argue about who'll pay – and end up not spending enough to do the job properly.

It took the feds far too long to realise that hotel quarantine was cheap but leaky. Every leak had the states closing borders against each other. The feds didn't spend enough securing supplies of vaccines, then took too long to realise a rapid rollout wasn't possible without help from the states.

Without thinking, Victoria initially staffed its hotel quarantine the usual way, with untrained, low-paid casual staff. It had run down its contact-tracing capacity and took too long to build it up – still without a decent QR code app. NSW let a host of infected people get off a cruise ship and spread the virus all over Australia.

The report of the royal commission laid much of blame for the aged care scandals on the feds' efforts to limit their spending on aged care. They couldn't demand providers meet decent standards because they weren't paying enough to make decent standards possible.

One of the main ways providers make do is by employing too few, unskilled, casual, part-time staff, who often need to do shifts at multiple sites. Do you think this has no connection with the sad truth that the great majority of deaths during Victoria's second lockdown occurred in aged care?

And now we discover the feds have failed to get the vaccine rollout well advanced even to aged care residents and staff.

Spend enough time denigrating and minimising government and you discover it isn't working properly when you really need it.

Ross Gittins is the economics editor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 03, 2021, 06:08:38 PM
here were 229 Mass. communities deemed high risk for COVID-19 in January. Now there are zero. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/12/18/nation/see-which-massachusetts-communities-are-high-risk-covid-19/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 03, 2021, 07:16:33 PM
Second Pfizer jab a few days ago. Some higher than usual fatigue the following evening, little else to report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 03, 2021, 09:08:49 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 03, 2021, 06:08:38 PM
here were 229 Mass. communities deemed high risk for COVID-19 in January. Now there are zero. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/12/18/nation/see-which-massachusetts-communities-are-high-risk-covid-19/?s_campaign=breakingnews:newsletter)

Good to hear.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on June 04, 2021, 02:23:44 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on June 03, 2021, 07:16:33 PM
Second Pfizer jab a few days ago. Some higher than usual fatigue the following evening, little else to report.

That is good to hear Simon.  0:)

If my data is correct, in NZ 10.2 % has gotten the first jab and 5.5 % the second. So, you are in good place for being among those 5.5 %.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on June 07, 2021, 03:12:12 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 27, 2021, 06:15:07 PM
A combination of anti-vaxxers and MAGA-verse science denialists.

Yes, but not only. There are also folks who have trouble scheduling appointments due to crazy work schedules, transportation issues, etc. There's a definite racial / socioeconomic divide in vaccination rates as well (poorer classes at significantly lower rates).

And, one must distinguish between anti-vaxxers and the merely vaccine-hesitant, in some cases due to rampant mis- and dis-information on social media.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 07, 2021, 03:54:20 AM
So far, only 0.1 % of those who received complete vaccine later contracted virus, an encouraging survey covering more than 5 months here in DK says (less than 1000 cases, of more than 1 mio persons, with Pfizer and Moderna). A few of them might have been infected before the jab. As regards an only partial vaccine, the number is higher, around twice as many.

Apparently, the numbers represent people who got a diagnosis, due to feeling ill, not systematic testing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 07, 2021, 04:41:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 07, 2021, 03:54:20 AM
So far, only 0.1 % of those who received complete vaccine later contracted virus, an encouraging survey covering more than 5 months here in DK says (less than 1000 cases, of more than 1 mio persons, with Pfizer and Moderna).

As far as I have read the people which are the most at risk of becoming ill despite vaccination, are the ones with depressed immunesystem. I am among them myself.

Do we know how many of those 0,1% which needed hospitalisation?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 07, 2021, 05:04:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 07, 2021, 03:54:20 AM
So far, only 0.1 % of those who received complete vaccine later contracted virus, an encouraging survey covering more than 5 months here in DK says (less than 1000 cases, of more than 1 mio persons, with Pfizer and Moderna). A few of them might have been infected before the jab. As regards an only partial vaccine, the number is higher, around twice as many.

Apparently, the numbers represent people who got a diagnosis, due to feeling ill, not systematic testing.
Interesting.  Thanks for the info.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 07, 2021, 05:10:37 AM
As I understand the SSI.dk website as of today, 10% of those illness cases with only one jab had hospitalizations, and a bit more of those who had two jabs, maybe 12%, were hospitalized. But there are some variable technical details influencing how to count this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 07, 2021, 05:34:53 AM
Quote from: krummholz on June 07, 2021, 03:12:12 AM
Yes, but not only. There are also folks who have trouble scheduling appointments due to crazy work schedules, transportation issues, etc. There's a definite racial / socioeconomic divide in vaccination rates as well (poorer classes at significantly lower rates).

And, one must distinguish between anti-vaxxers and the merely vaccine-hesitant, in some cases due to rampant mis- and dis-information on social media.

Good point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 09, 2021, 11:36:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 07, 2021, 03:54:20 AM
So far, only 0.1 % of those who received complete vaccine later contracted virus, an encouraging survey covering more than 5 months here in DK says (less than 1000 cases, of more than 1 mio persons, with Pfizer and Moderna). A few of them might have been infected before the jab. As regards an only partial vaccine, the number is higher, around twice as many.

Apparently, the numbers represent people who got a diagnosis, due to feeling ill, not systematic testing.

This is alpha data. The future is delta.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on June 09, 2021, 12:02:46 PM
Quote from: geralmar on June 09, 2021, 10:41:08 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/YSgjP9rZ/024-CE6-BF-D8-CA-438-F-860-C-701-D6-D7872-D5.png) (https://postimages.org/)

;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 09, 2021, 12:07:18 PM
Am a Stephen King ignoramus, but checked, and yes, he wrote something called 'The Stand'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: mabuse on June 09, 2021, 12:11:20 PM
 :laugh:

(https://i79.servimg.com/u/f79/19/91/80/91/stephe10.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 09, 2021, 03:09:34 PM
Variant exploding in U.K. accounts for 6 percent of U.S. infections, White House says' (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06/08/coronavirus-covid-live-updates-us/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 09, 2021, 04:38:32 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 09, 2021, 12:07:18 PM
Am a Stephen King ignoramus, but checked, and yes, he wrote something called 'The Stand'.

Highly recommended, even to those who think they have no interest at all in SK. Hugely ambitious and fully realized. Near universally agreed as the best thing he ever did.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 09, 2021, 06:02:27 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on June 09, 2021, 04:38:32 PM
Highly recommended, even to those who think they have no interest at all in SK. Hugely ambitious and fully realized. Near universally agreed as the best thing he ever did.

Duly noted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 09, 2021, 09:27:54 PM
Agreement about an almost complete, domestic opening up here in DK. Hopefully it will work. Almost half of the population has begun the vaccine process, and though there are still around 1000 daily infections, the number of fatalities and hospitalized remains low. The official prognosis says a further, quite dramatic flattening out of the curves from late June.

Masks will be kept only in relation to standing passengers in public transport, from this Monday, and abolished elsewhere; food servings will be until midnight, including alcohol, starting from tomorrow, and in mid-July until 2 AM; there will be normal education conditions, but with tests twice weekly recommended; allowance of 25,000 stadium spectators at the upcoming European Football/Soccer Championships; gradual outphasing of the Corona Pass, from the 1st of August, it will be abolished by the 1st of October; and loosening the travel conditions for visiting foreign tourists must be decided further upon within a week from now.

In the longer run, they hope for an abolishment of the current, massive, permanent testing apparatus, replacing it with sewage testing in stead.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 10, 2021, 01:13:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 09, 2021, 03:09:34 PM
Variant exploding in U.K. accounts for 6 percent of U.S. infections, White House says' (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06/08/coronavirus-covid-live-updates-us/)

That's a BIG problem unless you get vaccinations up FAST!!!!!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 12, 2021, 02:25:09 AM
The G7 summit will work for a strategy that can fight future pandemics globally and successfully within just 100 days, reports say today.
That would be nice ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on June 12, 2021, 06:13:54 AM
Now 50 % of Finns have gotten at least the first jab (12.7 % also the second one).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 12, 2021, 09:10:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 10, 2021, 01:13:25 AM
That's a BIG problem unless you get vaccinations up FAST!!!!!!

Indeed.

After the austerity of the lockdown, tourism to Boston is spiking dramatically now.  Some percentage of those folks coming in probably haven't bothered to vaccinate.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 12, 2021, 09:11:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 12, 2021, 02:25:09 AM
The G7 summit will work for a strategy that can fight future pandemics globally and successfully within just 100 days, reports say today.
That would be nice ...

Aye, planning and competence will be a nice change ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on June 12, 2021, 09:24:00 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 12, 2021, 02:25:09 AM
The G7 summit will work for a strategy that can fight future pandemics globally and successfully within just 100 days, reports say today.
That would be nice ...

Should be possible if they get advance notice of any future virus releases. :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 12, 2021, 09:32:03 AM
Here's my vision for the future

1. Lots of sickness and death in Europe and the USA, due to the ravages of δ. We will be OK in the UK because vaccination and exiting from the current lockdown has been well managed.

2. It'll be like gastroenteritis. Nearly everyone catches it often, most people shake it off, a few people end up in hospital and a few people have a long form -- IBS. We're all taught how to take precautions against it, and no-one lets it get in the way of having fun unless they've got some sort of aggravating medical condition or they're neurotic.

3. Domestic life mostly back to normal, as if nothing ever happened, in the UK in 2023 or even earlier. There will be lots of test, trace, isolate to guard against new variants and rapid vaccination against them.

4. In Europe there may be a reaction against the EU, demands to leave à la Brexit. Vaccine reluctance will be all but eradicated for adults.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 12, 2021, 09:37:37 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 12, 2021, 09:10:39 AM
Indeed.

After the austerity of the lockdown, tourism to Boston is spiking dramatically now.  Some percentage of those folks coming in probably haven't bothered to vaccinate.  ::)

The consequences are obvious and easily predictable, so the interesting question is, why are governments letting it happen? I suppose that really they don't give a fuck about the health consequences, and they care a lot about the economy. So they reason that a big wave in Autumn/winter is more than justified by the revenues accrued to hospitality and tourism in the summer.

Similar things are set to happen in the EU. I wonder if Que has any insight into the thinking of government about this.

What I find totally surprising is that the UK government seems to be behaving pretty responsibly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 13, 2021, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 12, 2021, 09:37:37 AM
The consequences are obvious and easily predictable, so the interesting question is, why are governments letting it happen? I suppose that really they don't give a fuck about the health consequences, and they care a lot about the economy. So they reason that a big wave in Autumn/winter is more than justified by the revenues accrued to hospitality and tourism in the summer.

Similar things are set to happen in the EU. I wonder if Que has any insight into the thinking of government about this.

What I find totally surprising is that the UK government seems to be behaving pretty responsibly.

A lot in this crisis has been about economics money...

In the winter of 2019 local Austrian authorities didn't act and close ski resorts for economic reasons, This was a major spreading event in Europe which resulted in the first lockdown in March.

Then the EU was behind the game, not only because of more cautious authorisation of new vaccines but also because it didn't want to pay too much. The US just threw a massive amount of money at it, and ended up first in line. The EU indeed ended up paying less for its vaccines, but was it really worth it?  ::)

Then in the summer of 2020 several Southern European countries allowed mass tourism for economic reasons, leading to the "Ibizza" spreading surge.

And the past few months I have seen govts jumping the gun and moving faster than scientific advisors suggested. For economic (=political) reasons.

I must sound cynical, but it has been about money, the economy and votes from day one...

BTW The UK govt did not behave anything close to responsible during most of this crisis...
The UK was in a pretty awful situation initially with high infection rates and many fatalities. But Boris' chums at AstraZeneca got him off the hook with a speedy supply of vaccines and good old NHS delivered a quick vaccination program.

The reason why the UK is so cautious now, is because the vaccinations have slowed down and a new "Indian" variant that is 40% more contagious has spread like nowhere else in Europe. Probably more could have been done to prevent this. Anyway, now you would need a vaccination rate of roughly 90% to achieve group immunity (!) instead of the previous 60-70%.

And I'm not gloating, because eventually this will spread to the rest of Europe as well. No wonder that governments are considering vaccinating children over 12 - those vaccination rates need to be beefed up ASAP. If anti-vaxers would prevent group immunity, I can forsee lots of political tensions.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 13, 2021, 09:45:02 AM
Quote from: Que on June 13, 2021, 09:18:43 AM


The reason why the UK is so cautious now, is because the vaccinations have slowed down and a new "Indian" variant that is 40% more contagious has spread like nowhere else in Europe. Probably more could have been done to prevent this. Anyway, now you would need a vaccination rate of roughly 90% to achieve group immunity (!) instead of the previous 60-70%.


Yes I fear that it will spread very quickly in Europe and indeed the US. By the way, where did you get the 90% figure for herd immunity from?

The problem I have is that it's really predictable what will happen, and yet Macron in France (the only European country I follow) looks like he's burying his head in the sand. Only yesterday there was some news that delta has been found in a flair up in Strasburg -- it's just not possible to keep this thing in check IMO.

I think the UK has been pretty responsible this year, and the level of information and dialogue with the public is so much better than in France. I can't speak for Holland, Germany, Spain, Italy . . .

I don't know that there's any point in vaccinating kids -- as far as I know there's no evidence to suggest that the vaccination reduces transmission, maybe you've seen something.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 13, 2021, 09:48:46 AM
QuoteI must sound cynical, but it has been about money, the economy and votes from day one...

In DK there's been massive critique of the government for not to adjust enough to the demands for reopening from the business life & its comrades during the whole pandemic, and really massive sums have been taken from state funds to compensate in stead. Virus experts have generally been satisfied with the scientific approach behind the government's policies, some have even wanted less lock-downs. Safety and avoiding a break-down in the health sector came first. Obviously, this strategy, resulting in less fatalities, also gave solid vote support. The economy seems to be recovering surprisingly fast.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 13, 2021, 09:55:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 13, 2021, 09:48:46 AM
In DK there's been massive critique of the government for not to adjust enough to the demands for reopening from the business life & its comrades during the whole pandemic, and really massive sums have been taken from state funds to compensate in stead. Virus experts have generally been satisfied with the scientific approach behind the government's policies, some have even wanted less lock-downs. Safety and avoiding a break-down in the health sector came first.

What does avoiding a break-down in the health sector mean? In the UK we've not seen people taking their last dying gasp in a tent in a hospital car park, though to avoid that we had to ship elderly non-symptomatic patients to their nursing homes, where they promptly infected all the other residents and effectively killed them.  But the waiting lists for non-COVID related treatments are very long, and there are predictable excess deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 13, 2021, 09:57:43 AM
There hasn't been big scandals of that sort in DK, since the number of hospitalizations has been quite low. Some weeks ago the health sector stated that the virus is no longer a hindrance for any other treatments. We currently have less than 100 hospitalized, and only once came close to the feared 1000 of them. There are, in theory, 1200 intensive respiratory care units, but we never came close to that number.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 13, 2021, 12:44:59 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 13, 2021, 09:45:02 AM
Yes I fear that it will spread very quickly in Europe and indeed the US. By the way, where did you get the 90% figure for herd immunity from?

I used Dutch sources, and opinions and percentages vary.
But the general assumption is that if transmissibility rises significantly, so does the threshold for group (herd) immunity.

https://www.dw.com/en/covid-why-experts-say-herd-immunity-is-still-out-of-reach/a-57860285

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2021/05/08/covid-19-herd-immunity-looks-like-a-mirage-but-is-worth-pursuing/?sh=139a8f66381f
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 13, 2021, 06:20:39 PM
Quote from: Que on June 13, 2021, 12:44:59 PM
I used Dutch sources, and opinions and percentages vary.
But the general assumption is that if transmissibility rises significantly, so does the threshold for group (herd) immunity.

https://www.dw.com/en/covid-why-experts-say-herd-immunity-is-still-out-of-reach/a-57860285 (https://www.dw.com/en/covid-why-experts-say-herd-immunity-is-still-out-of-reach/a-57860285)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2021/05/08/covid-19-herd-immunity-looks-like-a-mirage-but-is-worth-pursuing/?sh=139a8f66381f (https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2021/05/08/covid-19-herd-immunity-looks-like-a-mirage-but-is-worth-pursuing/?sh=139a8f66381f)


Thanks, Que, from the chap who wonders whether becoming a famous composer may be a mirage, but one worth pursuing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 14, 2021, 12:40:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 13, 2021, 06:20:39 PM
Thanks, Que, from the chap who wonders whether becoming a famous composer may be a mirage, but one worth pursuing.

:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 17, 2021, 02:33:05 AM
It's been decided to vaccinate the 12-15 year olds here in DK, probably influenced by the recent virus developments, such as the Delta. That's 250,000 pupils, and it will be voluntary.

This will likely be copied by other nations, and of course provoke anti-waxers. However, about 95% of the people here, who were offered vaccines also accepted it, so far.

Number of infections etc. still going down here though, following the opening up. Usually 75,000 - 85,000 vaccinations per day, from a population of 5.8 mio, which is good. And there's a heat wave too ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 17, 2021, 05:37:09 AM
One story about the impact of Covid-19 on the environment--the use of single-use masks and also improper disposal of them:

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-56322369

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on June 17, 2021, 06:45:10 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 13, 2021, 09:45:02 AMI don't know that there's any point in vaccinating kids -- as far as I know there's no evidence to suggest that the vaccination reduces transmission, maybe you've seen something.

Data has long been available that vaccination reduces the rate of transmission.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

The mechanism is fairly obvious. The vaccine does not make a person entirely immune, but makes immune response faster and more effective. As a result a person exposed is far less likely to get a serious infection. With lower viral load you are spewing less virus into the environment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 18, 2021, 12:42:29 AM
(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w23_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=0AFUXhpe)

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/situation-updates/weekly-maps-coordinated-restriction-free-movement
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 18, 2021, 12:48:25 AM
The Delta ("Indian") variant is on the march - Lisbon in full lockdown:

Lisbon ringed off at weekends as Portugal fights virus surge

Travel in and out of the Lisbon metropolitan area is to be banned over coming weekends as Portuguese authorities respond to a spike in new COVID-19 cases in the region around the capital. (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/lisbon-ringed-off-weekends-portugal-fights-virus-surge-78337824)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on June 18, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
My 17 year old granddaughter had her first jab yesterday. Thankfully no reaction yet as she was reluctant but we encouraged her to get it done.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 18, 2021, 07:39:21 AM
Quote from: Irons on June 18, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
My 17 year old granddaughter had her first jab yesterday. Thankfully no reaction yet as she was reluctant but we encouraged her to get it done.
Irons,

I cannot believe that you have a granddaughter that old!  You're too young for that!

In any event, glad that she went through with it and hope that all goes smoothly there.  Which vaccine did she get?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on June 18, 2021, 07:56:29 AM
Quote from: Irons on June 18, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
My 17 year old granddaughter had her first jab yesterday. Thankfully no reaction yet as she was reluctant but we encouraged her to get it done.

Same here with our granddaughter. She was reluctant because none of her friends had gotten it  ::). Now she's proud of being a pioneer  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 18, 2021, 07:57:55 AM
Quote from: André on June 18, 2021, 07:56:29 AM
Same here with our granddaughter. She was reluctant because none of her friends had gotten it  ::). Now she's proud of being a pioneer  :P
Yeah!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 18, 2021, 08:01:31 AM
Quote from: Que on June 18, 2021, 12:48:25 AM
The Delta ("Indian") variant is on the march - Lisbon in full lockdown:

Lisbon ringed off at weekends as Portugal fights virus surge

Travel in and out of the Lisbon metropolitan area is to be banned over coming weekends as Portuguese authorities respond to a spike in new COVID-19 cases in the region around the capital. (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/lisbon-ringed-off-weekends-portugal-fights-virus-surge-78337824)

That's very bad news, if not altogether unexpected. I must say, from the outside looking in, Europe looks like a train crash in slow motion. But your leaders must have built the models, maybe they think there's time enough to let summer tourism get a bit of a consumer cash injection, and for second dose vaccinations to catch up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 18, 2021, 08:19:40 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 18, 2021, 08:01:31 AM
That's very bad news, if not altogether unexpected. I must say, from the outside looking in, Europe looks like a train crash in slow motion. But your leaders must have built the models, maybe they think there's time enough to let summer tourism get a bit of a consumer cash injection, and for second dose vaccinations to catch up.

Summer tourism will be a sandcastle IMO.... It just hasn't just sunk in yet.
Vaccinations across Europe have gathered speed, but probably not enough to outpace the Delta variant in the coming months. After that, we get a window of normality....untill we are hit by a new tricky variant - plenty of possible candidates...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 18, 2021, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Que on June 18, 2021, 08:19:40 AM
Summer tourism will be a sandcastle IMO.... It just hasn't just sunk in yet.
Vaccinations across Europe have gathered speed, but probably not enough to outpace the Delta variant in the coming months. After that, we get a window of normality....untill we are hit by a new tricky variant - plenty of possible candidates...

Chris Whitty, the UK government's chief medical adviser, gave a speech to the National Health Service Confederation yesterday, where he said that he expected polyvalent vaccinations to be available in five years. We all know that a forecast of five years means "don't hold your breath." We're going to have to find a way of managing these variants until a general vaccine is developed because something tells me not to hold my breath until the world is vaccinated either. And global capitalism needs free travel.


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2021/jun/17/uk-covid-live-news-coronavirus-delta-variant-hancock-johnson?page=with:block-60cb52b68f08bfe0ccb149a0#block-60cb52b68f08bfe0ccb149a0
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on June 19, 2021, 01:17:01 AM
Today early in the morning I got my second Astra Zeneca jab. So far so good, feel it a little in my arm, but thats all so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 01:42:10 AM
Good to hear. My second Pfizer is on Friday ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 19, 2021, 03:33:54 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on June 19, 2021, 01:17:01 AM
Today early in the morning I got my second Astra Zeneca jab. So far so good, feel it a little in my arm, but thats all so far.

Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 01:42:10 AM
Good to hear. My second Pfizer is on Friday ...
A big yeah for you both.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 06:50:38 AM
Thank you!

Not what you'd usually associate with Scandinavia:

Swedish police investigating a likely case of fraud, with 100,000 false PCR-tests showing a negative test result, each made for the price of SEK 1500 including travel documents, or around 150 Euros, for the individual customer, the newspaper Aftonbladet reports. Tests simply weren't analyzed. The protagonists have fled. An employee warned the authorities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 19, 2021, 12:29:07 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 06:50:38 AM
Thank you!

Not what you'd usually associate with Scandinavia:

Swedish police investigating a likely case of fraud, with 100,000 false PCR-tests showing a negative test result, each made for the price of SEK 1500 including travel documents, or around 150 Euros, for the individual customer, the newspaper Aftonbladet reports. Tests simply weren't analyzed. The protagonists have fled. An employee warned the authorities.
Wow!  ??? Just to clarify, did they actually sell 100,000 of these tests/documents?  Or unsure at the moment?  Any idea where the folks that came up with this scam were from and/or anything else about their background(s)?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 08:38:22 PM
They did some ~PCR testing on various locations, apparently about 100,000 of tests, and also provided very quick results, because the analyzing procedures were skipped. Basically it just took an associated doctor's verifying signature. They're supposed to have made SEK 100 mio on this scam, but now arrests are being made, 3 of 6 people have been caught. The company was called 'Doktorgruppen', and the main protagonists seem to have been a doctor, now wanted  - Hamman al Saaid, 33 years old, who'd been engaged in dubious health companies and tax fraud before - and another, 55-year old doctor.

Obviously, despicable and very concerning for both individual and societal safety, since many actual virus cases would then remain undiscovered, or undiscovered for too long.

Source, in Swedish
https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/coronaviruset/100-000-svenskar-kan-ha-lurats-av-falska-covid-test/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on June 19, 2021, 09:12:49 PM
Well after the second jab of Astra Zeneca I can report that I got the same issues as with the first jab. Flu like Symptoms. muscle pain, and a disgruntled stomach. Did not sleep well either. Not everything is a bed of roses it seems. Will fight my way through obviously, but I did not expect this to be honestly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 19, 2021, 09:23:53 PM
Quote from: "Harry" on June 19, 2021, 09:12:49 PM
Well after the second jab of Astra Zeneca I can report that I got the same issues as with the first jab. Flu like Symptoms. muscle pain, and a disgruntled stomach. Did not sleep well either. Not everything is a bed of roses it seems. Will fight my way through obviously, but I did not expect this to be honestly.

I've heard from more people that they experienced something resembling a heavy flu after an AstraZeneca shot.

BTW I'm getting my first shot this morning, which will be Pfizer or Moderna.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on June 19, 2021, 09:29:53 PM
Quote from: Que on June 19, 2021, 09:23:53 PM
I've heard from more people that they experienced something resembling a heavy flu after an AstraZeneca shot.

BTW I'm getting my first shot this morning, which will be Pfizer or Moderna.

I hope you get the Pfizer, to my knowledge that is the vaccin that gives minimal issues. Moderna in the first shot is pretty harmless, but the second shot gives the same symptoms as Astra Zeneca. Not great problems though, but rather unpleasantness.
Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 20, 2021, 12:48:35 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on June 19, 2021, 09:29:53 PM
I hope you get the Pfizer, to my knowledge that is the vaccin that gives minimal issues. Moderna in the first shot is pretty harmless, but the second shot gives the same symptoms as Astra Zeneca. Not great problems though, but rather unpleasantness.
Good luck!

Thanks.  :)  It was indeed Pfizer. Sofar just a little bit of stiffness in the upper arm, which is to be expected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on June 20, 2021, 04:42:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 06:50:38 AM

Not what you'd usually associate with Scandinavia:

Swedish police investigating a likely case of fraud, with 100,000 false PCR-tests showing a negative test result, each made for the price of SEK 1500 including travel documents, or around 150 Euros, for the individual customer, the newspaper Aftonbladet reports. Tests simply weren't analyzed. The protagonists have fled. An employee warned the authorities.


It never ceases to amaze me how low some people will stoop. Scum of the Earth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 20, 2021, 05:20:49 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 08:38:22 PM
They did some ~PCR testing on various locations, apparently about 100,000 of tests, and also provided very quick results, because the analyzing procedures were skipped. Basically it just took an associated doctor's verifying signature. They're supposed to have made SEK 100 mio on this scam, but now arrests are being made, 3 of 6 people have been caught. The company was called 'Doktorgruppen', and the main protagonists seem to have been a doctor, now wanted  - Hamman al Saaid, 33 years old, who'd been engaged in dubious health companies and tax fraud before - and another, 55-year old doctor.

Obviously, despicable and very concerning for both individual and societal safety, since many actual virus cases would then remain undiscovered, or undiscovered for too long.

Source, in Swedish
https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/coronaviruset/100-000-svenskar-kan-ha-lurats-av-falska-covid-test/
That's incredible...hard to believe that people could be so corrupt and uncaring.  :(  Do they have a list of people and contact info so that they can contact them?  Any idea what the penalties will be for those who purchased these results and travel documents?  Sorry, but I can't read Swedish.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 20, 2021, 05:34:49 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 20, 2021, 05:20:49 AM
That's incredible...hard to believe that people could be so corrupt and uncaring.  :(  Do they have a list of people and contact info so that they can contact them?  Any idea what the penalties will be for those who purchased these results and travel documents?  Sorry, but I can't read Swedish.

PD

More info will turn up in the next days, but a court case will take a long time. The story seems to break internationally too now; apparently, 'Aftonbladet' came first, but that was only yesterday ... the protagonists may have fled out of the country, with that amount of money involved. I guess it was pretty obvious that such a scam would be discovered at some point, so they've probably conceived an escape plan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 20, 2021, 05:59:44 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 20, 2021, 05:34:49 AM
More info will turn up in the next days, but a court case will take a long time. The story seems to break internationally too now; apparently, 'Aftonbladet' came first, but that was only yesterday ... the protagonists may have fled out of the country, with that amount of money involved. I guess it was pretty obvious that such a scam would be discovered at some point, so they've probably conceived an escape plan.
Ah, I put some of the article through google translate.  So, the people who purchased these documents didn't know that they were getting "sketchy" results and thusly shouldn't have received their travel documents from him?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 20, 2021, 06:13:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 20, 2021, 05:59:44 AM
Ah, I put some of the article through google translate.  So, the people who purchased these documents didn't know that they were getting "sketchy" results and thusly shouldn't have received their travel documents from him?

PD

No, the results were worthless, but claimed to be fully legitimate and impeccable by the scammers. The profit they got was from skipping a correct handling of tests & not involving any laboratory procedures. I guess ~test equipment can be had in rather primitive and cheap versions, if you really want to save money, and the - usually young - employees just need a quick introduction & probably don't dig into company issues. In DK I think they get a 3-hour course for a start, but with more experienced staff also being present at proceedings. In DK, PCR-tests and Nose-tests are done by the health sector itself and especially two major, established companies, as I understand it. The testing had to grow from 0 to now maybe 300,000 per day, in a relatively short time span here. The number is going down now, however, due to more vaccinations and a current, continued virus decrease.

With the 100,000 fake tests, and the virus being more present in Sweden than in quite a few other places, this scam is quite likely to have cost lives, I think. It was done in the Stockholm-area, which has had a high virus density. People are known to have become very sick in just a few days, and the Swedish health sector has had problems coping with it.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 21, 2021, 06:24:03 AM
After initial experiments, more systematic sewage testing in Copenhagen, called "a super-weapon against corona", will begin next week, the city being divided in 12 regions of around 50 smaller areas. The good thing about this method is that it discovers any outbreaks earlier. Later, the method will become nation-wide.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on June 21, 2021, 07:11:40 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 21, 2021, 06:24:03 AM
After initial experiments, more systematic sewage testing in Copenhagen, called "a super-weapon against corona", will begin next week, the city being divided in 12 regions of around 50 smaller areas. The good thing about this method is that it discovers any outbreaks earlier. Later, the method will become nation-wide.

That's what they do in the Netherlands, started with it when the second wave came over us. A very good method to discover outbreaks in an early stage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on June 21, 2021, 07:27:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 08:38:22 PM
the main protagonists seem to have been a doctor, now wanted  - Hamman al Saaid, 33 years old, who'd been engaged in dubious health companies and tax fraud before -

The doctor's name is indeed

Quote from: MusicTurner on June 19, 2021, 06:50:38 AM
Not what you'd usually associate with Scandinavia:

Sorry, couldn't resist.   ;D



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 21, 2021, 07:35:37 AM
Quote from: Florestan on June 21, 2021, 07:27:16 AM
The doctor's name is indeed

Sorry, couldn't resist.   ;D

Hard to disagree with that one.
Not exactly a household Folkhemmet name.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2021, 01:54:36 PM
Quote from: Que on June 18, 2021, 12:48:25 AM
The Delta ("Indian") variant is on the march - Lisbon in full lockdown:

Lisbon ringed off at weekends as Portugal fights virus surge

Travel in and out of the Lisbon metropolitan area is to be banned over coming weekends as Portuguese authorities respond to a spike in new COVID-19 cases in the region around the capital. (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/lisbon-ringed-off-weekends-portugal-fights-virus-surge-78337824)

Ouch!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2021, 01:55:07 PM
Quote from: Irons on June 18, 2021, 07:30:32 AM
My 17 year old granddaughter had her first jab yesterday. Thankfully no reaction yet as she was reluctant but we encouraged her to get it done.   

Very good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2021, 01:56:29 PM
Models predict U.S. coronavirus infections could surge this fall if vaccination rates lag, former FDA chief says (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06/20/us-coronavirus-infection-rate-fall-2021/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 22, 2021, 03:15:47 PM
What the Delta variant could mean for Covid-19 in the United States (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/22/health/covid-variant-delta-gamma/index.html) (CNN)

I guess the good news is that current vaccines are still, though less, effective against the Delta variant.

The bad news is you need a higher threshold for group immunity.
This article mentions a vaccination rate of 86% to stop further spread, which might unachievable for many parts of the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2021, 06:18:59 PM
Quote from: Que on June 22, 2021, 03:15:47 PM
What the Delta variant could mean for Covid-19 in the United States (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/22/health/covid-variant-delta-gamma/index.html) (CNN)

I guess the good news is that current vaccines are still, though less, effective against the Delta variant.

The bad news is you need a higher threshold for group immunity.
This article mentions a vaccination rate of 86% to stop further spread, which might unachievable for many parts of the US.

I wonder if even 50% vaccination is possible in MAGA nation. idiots!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 22, 2021, 11:42:19 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 22, 2021, 06:18:59 PM
I wonder if even 50% vaccination is possible in MAGA nation. idiots!

That is worrying....  ::) Vaccination hesitancy in general is: it will prevent the protection of those that cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, like infants, the sick and the very elderly, and it will increase the chance of the spread of variants that are immune to the vaccines.

Vaccination hesitancy in the EU overall is now estimated at around 25%, which is still too high. Hopefully at least another 10% can be persuaded to be vaccinated. I hope that reaching out to the poorly informed and less educated, combined with travel restrictions for the more affluent anti vaxxers will do the trick...

Current vaccination rates in the EU: 54,8% has received at least one dose, with 31% fully vaccinated.

https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html#uptake-tab

Here in the Netherlands expectation is that mid August anyone willing will be fully vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 22, 2021, 11:59:57 PM
Quote from: Que on June 22, 2021, 11:42:19 PM


Here in the Netherlands expectation is that mid August anyone willing will be fully vaccinated.

That's good progress. Is that representative of other EU countries?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 23, 2021, 03:36:27 AM
In Russia for example, just 13% have been vaccinated, and they've now really begun to take this issue seriously, by introducing obligatory vaccines under a lot of circumstances.

It seems likely that more and more similar measures will be taken in such regions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 23, 2021, 04:01:06 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 23, 2021, 03:36:27 AM
In Russia for example, just 13% have been vaccinated, and they've now really begun to take this issue seriously, by introducing obligatory vaccines under a lot of circumstances.

It seems likely that more and more similar measures will be taken in such regions..

It seems quite possible that we will have a more authoritarian EU and UK  in the near future. I wonder how the people will respond to that.

A friend of mine from Romania talks about how the people from communist countries sleepwalked into liberticide measures, many feeling that each one was justified on the grounds of security. But they add up . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 23, 2021, 04:39:30 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 22, 2021, 11:59:57 PM
That's good progress. Is that representative of other EU countries?

With percentages of 63,3% for at least one dose and 36,2% for completed vaccinations, the numbers for the Netherlands are above the EU average. That's just over 14 million shots on a population of just over 17 million. Speed is picking up at 200,000 shots per day/ 1.4 million a week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on June 23, 2021, 07:02:17 AM
Quote from: Que on June 22, 2021, 11:42:19 PM
That is worrying....  ::) Vaccination hesitancy in general is: it will prevent the protection of those that cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, like infants, the sick and the very elderly, and it will increase the chance of the spread of variants that are immune to the vaccines.

Vaccination hesitancy in the EU overall is now estimated at around 25%, which is still too high. Hopefully at least another 10% can be persuaded to be vaccinated. I hope that reaching out to the poorly informed and less educated, combined with travel restrictions for the more affluent anti vaxxers will do the trick...

Current vaccination rates in the EU: 54,8% has received at least one dose, with 31% fully vaccinated.

https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html#uptake-tab

Here in the Netherlands expectation is that mid August anyone willing will be fully vaccinated.

As of writing this EU average for at least one dose = 57.3 % (Finland 68.7 %) and for fully vaccinated = 34.0 % (Finland 19.2 %) so Finland is ahead of the EU average for the first dose, but lags behind for the second dose (the 12 weeks between doses instead of 3 makes this: For example I still have over 5 weeks before I get my 2nd jab in July 31!) meaning by mid August around 45 % of adult Finns are fully vaccinated. I'd say everyone willing to be vaccinated will be "before Christmas!"  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 24, 2021, 07:45:33 AM
Quote from: Que on June 23, 2021, 04:39:30 AM
With percentages of 63,3% for at least one dose and 36,2% for completed vaccinations, the numbers for the Netherlands are above the EU average. That's just over 14 million shots on a population of just over 17 million. Speed is picking up at 200,000 shots per day/ 1.4 million a week.

Do you reckon I've got any chance of getting to this without quarantining?

https://oudemuziek.nl/agenda/alle-concerten-20212022/fom21002-cantus-modalis-seconda-prat-ca/27-aug-utrecht-2230/

I need to meet a Dutch civil servant who can pull some strings , , ,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on June 24, 2021, 08:43:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 24, 2021, 07:45:33 AM
Do you reckon I've got any chance of getting to this without quarantining?

https://oudemuziek.nl/agenda/alle-concerten-20212022/fom21002-cantus-modalis-seconda-prat-ca/27-aug-utrecht-2230/

I need to meet a Dutch civil servant who can pull some strings , , ,

Would you be let back afterwards? :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 24, 2021, 08:43:30 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 24, 2021, 07:45:33 AM
Do you reckon I've got any chance of getting to this without quarantining?

https://oudemuziek.nl/agenda/alle-concerten-20212022/fom21002-cantus-modalis-seconda-prat-ca/27-aug-utrecht-2230/

I need to meet a Dutch civil servant who can pull some strings , , ,

I'm afraid chances of that are pretty slim......

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

The Netherlands is on an 8th place of least corrupted countries, right after Norway and before Germany.  :D

Your best chance is that by the end of August the infection rate in the UK has gone down and vaccination rate in the Netherlands has gone up. Which might very well be the case. I would risk orderering tickets.

Delighted that you like the Utrecht Early Music Festival BTW.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 24, 2021, 08:59:44 AM
Quote from: Que on June 24, 2021, 08:43:30 AM

The Netherlands is on an 8th place of least corrupted countries, right after Norway and before Germany.  :D

I note with some satisfaction that my homeland is number one on the list.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 24, 2021, 09:39:21 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on June 24, 2021, 08:59:44 AM
I note with some satisfaction that my homeland is number one on the list.  :)

Yes, I've wondered though if that position would still be kept, since we've had a handful of corruption cases in later years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 24, 2021, 10:12:40 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on June 24, 2021, 07:45:33 AM
Do you reckon I've got any chance of getting to this without quarantining?

https://oudemuziek.nl/agenda/alle-concerten-20212022/fom21002-cantus-modalis-seconda-prat-ca/27-aug-utrecht-2230/

I need to meet a Dutch civil servant who can pull some strings , , ,
I'd be curious to hear about what you've seen in terms of SW19 and what you've noticed in terms of the number of people/visitors coming to your area now that Wimbledon qualifying is on and I believe that the main draw starts of Monday?  I believe that they will be allowing 50% grounds capacity to start and 100% for the men's and women's singles finals.  Not certain whether or not there are any other rules regarding crowd size over the course of the even?

Have you ever gone to The Championships yourself?  :)

Good luck with the concert.  Hope that things continue to improve in the UK--and everywhere else too!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 24, 2021, 01:19:42 PM
Quote from: Que on June 24, 2021, 08:43:30 AM
I'm afraid chances of that are pretty slim......

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

The Netherlands is on an 8th place of least corrupted countries, right after Norway and before Germany.  :D

Your best chance is that by the end of August the infection rate in the UK has gone down and vaccination rate in the Netherlands has gone up. Which might very well be the case. I would risk orderering tickets.

Delighted that you like the Utrecht Early Music Festival BTW.  :)

Ah well, nothing ventured nothing gained.

By the way, the mass they're doing, Missa Mater Patris, is perfect for their approach. Tallis Scholars recorded it and it must be one of the best things they ever did - if you haven't heard it, put aside your preconceptions about their style and try it out, I bet you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on June 25, 2021, 04:27:29 AM
UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock has admitted breaching social distancing rules after a newspaper published photos of him embracing his aide / secret girlfriend. :-[

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15388014/matt-hancock-secret-affair-with-aide/ (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15388014/matt-hancock-secret-affair-with-aide/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 25, 2021, 05:48:35 AM
Quote from: Que on June 18, 2021, 12:42:29 AM
(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w23_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=0AFUXhpe)

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/situation-updates/weekly-maps-coordinated-restriction-free-movement

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w24_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=-83S4QZ4)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 25, 2021, 11:33:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 24, 2021, 10:12:40 AM
I'd be curious to hear about what you've seen in terms of SW19 and what you've noticed in terms of the number of people/visitors coming to your area now that Wimbledon qualifying is on and I believe that the main draw starts of Monday?  I believe that they will be allowing 50% grounds capacity to start and 100% for the men's and women's singles finals.  Not certain whether or not there are any other rules regarding crowd size over the course of the even?

Have you ever gone to The Championships yourself?  :)

Good luck with the concert.  Hope that things continue to improve in the UK--and everywhere else too!

PD

The Wimbledon tennis is not in fact in Wimbledon, but it's close and I have been and in fact I have a friend who has a house where you can see onto a court from the top bedroom. But I'm not so interested any more so . . .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 30, 2021, 06:35:54 AM
Lucky friend Mandryka!

One thing that the commentators have brought up (several times) which doesn't make sense to me (nor to them) is that o.k., so they are allowing half the usual amount of grounds passes as usual (including tickets to Centre Court, etc.) per NHS rules.  They are also asking people to wear masks when walking around the grounds (outside), BUT as far as seating goes, they have everybody sitting right next to each other on the show courts!  They also are not allowing seating in the upper reaches, so better seating for those there, but again this means that everybody is squished in there right next to each other.  No masks required there and sometimes they have also closed the roofs due to rain.  I'm left scratching my head wondering about the logic of this.   ??? :-\

In any event, I'm glad that it's back!  I missed it last year.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on June 30, 2021, 09:47:19 AM
My calculations are as follows, I'll "show my working" if anyone's interested. All this is based on UK data, where delta is 90% of cases at least and a large part of the population over 50 is fully vaccinated.

First hospitalisations. It looks as though hospitalisations  ≈ cases * 0.02. With alpha and no vaccines, in the wave in Spring this year, hospitalisations  ≈ cases * 0.08.

In spring the health system got through 50K cases a day and survived after a fashion, so I conclude that now we have headroom for 4 * 50K cases a day, i.e. 200K cases a day.

We're currently at 20K cases a day, with a doubling time of about two weeks. If things carry on like this, it makes 80K cases a day by the end of July and we're in the shit mid/end August, in deep shit mid September.

Of course vaccination has an effect on transmission, as discussed above. Though this may be counterbalanced by removing NPIs like social distancing. Also, some sort of mass community immunity may start to make itself felt in the model.

But still I can't help feel that we're part of a very scary and exciting community experiment. I hope God is on our side. And thank God we've got a high rate of vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 01, 2021, 01:52:38 PM
A toxic mix of a football tournament and the Delta variant:

Covid: Europe risks new wave, WHO warns (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57677178)

You couldn't make this stuff up.... ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 12:08:03 AM
Some friends' analysis of UK data (about delta and vaccination) suggests that in vaccinated populations doubling time is about 15 days - 12 days in unvaccinated populations.

I will let others draw conclusions.

This interesting looking Guardian article suggests that the UK strategy is to achieve vaccine induced herd immunity. But I don't see how that's possible, the vaccines don't stop you catching the virus or transmitting it to others!


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/02/we-are-a-petri-dish-world-watches-uks-race-between-vaccine-and-virus
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 02, 2021, 12:39:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 12:08:03 AM

This interesting looking Guardian article suggests that the UK strategy is to achieve vaccine induced herd immunity. But I don't see how that's possible, the vaccines don't stop you catching the virus or transmitting it to others!

The general assumption is that vaccines actually do significantly reduce transmission.
But all vaccines are less effective against the Delta variant. As I pointed out before, a more infectious variant and lower effectiveness of vaccines means you need a much higher vaccination rate as a threshold for group immunity. Before I mentioned 90%, the linked article mentions 85%.

I think the facts that the UK generally used AstraZeneca, a vaccine that is less effective than Pfizer or Moderna, and initially opted for a 1st shot for as many as possible instead of full vaccinations, will also play into this. AZ is only effective against the Delta variant with full vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 01:33:50 AM
Quote from: Que on July 02, 2021, 12:39:01 AM
The general assumption is that vaccines actually do significantly reduce transmission.
But all vaccines are less effective against the Delta variant. As I pointed out before, a more infectious variant and lower effectiveness of vaccines means you need a much higher vaccination rate as a threshold for group immunity. Before I mentioned 90%, the linked article mentions 85%.

I think the facts that the UK generally used AstraZeneca, a vaccine that is less effective than Pfizer or Moderna, and initially opted for a 1st shot for as many as possible instead of full vaccinations, will also play into this. AZ is only effective against the Delta variant with full vaccination.

Well as I say what we seem to be seeing is that the vaccinated populations have a 15 day doubling time. And that 2% of them need hospital care. That's not good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 02, 2021, 02:10:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 01:33:50 AM
Well as I say what we seem to be seeing is that the vaccinated populations have a 15 day doubling time. And that 2% of them need hospital care. That's not good.

Indeed. Latetst research in Scotland suggests that AstraZeneca is only 60% effective - after full vaccination  (2 shots). Full vaccination does however significantly reduce the chance of hospitalisation (92%).

Is this "vaccinated population" fully vaccinated? Or are those with one or two shots taken together?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 02, 2021, 03:02:16 AM
Quote from: Que on July 01, 2021, 01:52:38 PM
A toxic mix of a football tournament and the Delta variant:

Covid: Europe risks new wave, WHO warns (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57677178)

You couldn't make this stuff up.... ???

Sadly a lot of people just can't be without "live" entertainment for a couple of years even if it means prolonged pandemic. Maybe this is an extrovert thing, because as an introvert I can't understand it because I rather watch tv home than go to a stadium with 10.000 other people and I rather listen to my CDs than go to a classical music concert. However, I know extroverts need other people as much as we introverts need to be alone...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 02, 2021, 05:47:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 12:08:03 AMThis interesting looking Guardian article suggests that the UK strategy is to achieve vaccine induced herd immunity. But I don't see how that's possible, the vaccines don't stop you catching the virus or transmitting it to others!

The mRNA vaccines do prevent you from spreading the virus to others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 08:36:03 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 02, 2021, 05:47:43 AM
The mRNA vaccines do prevent you from spreading the virus to others.

Do you have a reference? (I know they reduce the amount of virus you spread. But you don't need to come into contact with very much delta to get ill.)

(I'm glad you keep contributing to this thread. How's Texas?)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 08:37:12 AM
Quote from: Que on July 02, 2021, 02:10:23 AM
Indeed. Latetst research in Scotland suggests that AstraZeneca is only 60% effective - after full vaccination  (2 shots). Full vaccination does however significantly reduce the chance of hospitalisation (92%).

Is this "vaccinated population" fully vaccinated? Or are those with one or two shots taken together?

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of AZ against delta. Caveat lector.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 10:09:13 AM
Quote from: Que on July 02, 2021, 02:10:23 AM

Is this "vaccinated population" fully vaccinated? Or are those with one or two shots taken together?

Fully.  But the figures are small and it's not really time to draw confident conclusions.

I think I understand what the UK strategy is. They are inducing naturally acquired herd immunity and using the vaccine to limit the flack. The vaccine is a bit like a cold remedy, or an anti inflammatory for arthritis  . . . it just makes the symptoms less horrible, without stopping the disease.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 02, 2021, 05:48:39 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 02, 2021, 08:36:03 AM
Do you have a reference? (I know they reduce the amount of virus you spread. But you don't need to come into contact with very much delta to get ill.)

(I'm glad you keep contributing to this thread. How's Texas?)

I posted a reference when you made a similar comment.

Quote from: Spotted Horses on June 17, 2021, 06:45:10 AM
Data has long been available that vaccination reduces the rate of transmission.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

The mechanism is fairly obvious. The vaccine does not make a person entirely immune, but makes immune response faster and more effective. As a result a person exposed is far less likely to get a serious infection. With lower viral load you are spewing less virus into the environment.

The salient point

QuoteA growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) are less likely to have asymptomatic infection or to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others. Studies are underway to learn more about the benefits of Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine. However, the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.

I don't know about Delta variant. The CDC does not do lab experiments, they analyze statistics on infection rates, vaccination rates, questionnaires filled out by infected people, etc. I don't know if Delta variant is prevalent enough in the U.S. for reliable data collection.

Thanks for the appreciation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 03, 2021, 01:02:32 AM
Quote from: Que on June 25, 2021, 05:48:35 AM
(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w24_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=-83S4QZ4)

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w25_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_1.png?itok=49JM8-Yy)

The map of Europe is clearing up, with the exception of Portugal, Spain and the UK (no data on map). The rise of the Delta variant is a big factor in this.

The fear is that this summer Mediterranean beaches full of unvaccinated teenagers will generate another wave of infections. It's a race between vaccinations and the Delta variant - countries with a low/slow vaccination rate could get into trouble again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 03, 2021, 01:21:34 AM
Interesting to see pockets in the tourists islands of Spain and indeed one in Greece. I'd have thought it would have made sense to be sure that there was a very high level of vaccination on those islands. Same for the big Spanish tourists centres like the Costa Brava.  How the fk can Santorini be yellow?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 03, 2021, 01:31:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 03, 2021, 01:21:34 AM
Interesting to see pockets in the tourists islands of Spain and indeed one in Greece. I'd have thought it would have made sense to be sure that there was a very high level of vaccination on those islands. Same for the big Spanish tourists centres like the Costa Brava.  How the fk can Santorini be yellow?

It seems we'll get some kind of repetition of last summer.... ::)

I guess those tourism euros are very, very hard to resist.  ???

Looking back at this pandemic, in Europe the winter and summer holiday seasons played a key role in spreading the infection across Europe - though mainly Western Europe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 03, 2021, 01:59:30 AM
Bad news from Russia:

QuoteRussia's COVID-19 daily death toll climbs to new pandemic high

MOSCOW, July 2 (Reuters) - Russia registered a record number of daily COVID-19-related deaths on Friday amid a surge in cases across the world's largest country that the authorities blame on the infectious Delta variant.

The government's coronavirus taskforce said 679 people had died in the last 24 hours, the highest figure confirmed in a single day since the pandemic began. It also reported 23,218 new infections in the last 24 hours, including 6,893 in Moscow.

The Russian capital, the epicentre of the outbreak throughout the pandemic, is racing to repurpose hospitals to treat an influx of patients, Anastasiya Rakova, the city's deputy mayor, said.

"Now, with this explosive growth in infections, this (hospital) capacity is no longer enough and we will additionally add other hospitals again to combat the virus, as fast as possible, I hope," Russian news agencies quoted Rakova as saying. "(But) we'll do everything possible not to declare a lockdown," she said.

The surge in cases has prompted officials to impose an array of measures to compel or encourage people to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Vaccines are widely available, but demand for the shots has been tepid and polls show many people don't want to have them. Around 2.6 million people in Moscow have had at least the first component of a vaccine out of a population of more than 12.5 million, Rakova was cited as saying.

"Germany will close its borders to Russians starting Tuesday to prevent the importation of mutated Covid-19 strains, the German Embassy in Moscow announced."

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/07/03/coronavirus-in-russia-the-latest-news-july-2-a69117
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 03, 2021, 03:50:45 AM
Now 60 % of Finns have got at least the 1st jab and 20 % are fully vaccinated. In 4 weeks I'll get my 2nd jab.

Vaccinations are heavily skewed toward older people: 84.6 % of people 80 or older are fully vaccinated and of 70-74 years olds 66 % are fully vaccinated while of 20-24 olds only 3.1 % are fully vaccinated. This means that especially among the younger Finns the virus (delta-variant) can spread, but there aren't many hospitalizations and corona related deaths thanks to the risk groups being so well vaccinated at this point.

It is interesting how in the US people are starting to live as if Covid-19 was over. Hopefully the rest of the World gets to that point sooner than later...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 03, 2021, 09:37:58 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 03, 2021, 03:50:45 AM
It is interesting how in the US people are starting to live as if Covid-19 was over. Hopefully the rest of the World gets to that point sooner than later...

Well yes, as if indeed....  In reality NOBODY is getting to that point anytime soon....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 03, 2021, 10:09:38 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 03, 2021, 03:50:45 AM
Now 60 % of Finns have got at least the 1st jab and 20 % are fully vaccinated. In 4 weeks I'll get my 2nd jab.

Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 03, 2021, 10:47:45 PM
In Australia we've approached this from the wrong perspective which is elimination of the virus. It's obvious that there is no actual way to do that yet our state governments continue to lock us down while vacillating on vaccination. The proof is staring them in the face yet they refuse to accept it.

The recent Sydney outbreak was started by a limo driver ferrying aircrew, one of whom passed on the Delta variant to him. This driver then went to a social gathering of about 34 people. Of these, 27 were infected and seven were cleared. All seven of those who tested negative were vaccinated!

Bottom line - get everyone vaccinated ASAP. It doesn't matter whether it's AstraZeneca, Pfizer or Moderna. Whatever's there, use it because it works. For AstraZeneca we have a twelve week turn around between the two jabs. The long turn around makes this drug just as effective as the two rMNA alternatives. The longer we wait for a specific drug (Pfizer seems to be preferred) the longer it will take until Covid19 becomes endemic as opposed to a pandemic.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 12:08:11 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/h7Kfzqt/210811-C0-2-F40-4044-A5-E6-951-E885576-F5.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 04, 2021, 12:12:47 AM
Quote from: Holden on July 03, 2021, 10:47:45 PM
In Australia we've approached this from the wrong perspective which is elimination of the virus. It's obvious that there is no actual way to do that yet our state governments continue to lock us down while vacillating on vaccination. The proof is staring them in the face yet they refuse to accept it.

The recent Sydney outbreak was started by a limo driver ferrying aircrew, one of whom passed on the Delta variant to him. This driver then went to a social gathering of about 34 people. Of these, 27 were infected and seven were cleared. All seven of those who tested negative were vaccinated!

Bottom line - get everyone vaccinated ASAP. It doesn't matter whether it's AstraZeneca, Pfizer or Moderna. Whatever's there, use it because it works. For AstraZeneca we have a twelve week turn around between the two jabs. The long turn around makes this drug just as effective as the two rMNA alternatives. The longer we wait for a specific drug (Pfizer seems to be preferred) the longer it will take until Covid19 becomes endemic as opposed to a pandemic.

100% agreed - vaccination with any effective vaccine is the only way forward. For countries with a warmer climate and less sophisticated infrastructure, the "classic" vaccines like AstraZeneca or Jansen will be the only viable option anyway.

But a social gathering of 34 people in a lockdown is plain stupid.....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 04, 2021, 12:28:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 12:08:11 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/h7Kfzqt/210811-C0-2-F40-4044-A5-E6-951-E885576-F5.jpg)

Same here. Mask requirements largely have been lifted a week ago. Even though there is still scientific debate whether these low-grade masks actually reduce risks in a significant way, in the public mind this is an "all clear" sign and people start behaving as if nothing ever happened and we not in the midst of a pandemic anymore.

People want it to be over, so they have decided it is over. And cowardly politicians do not dare to tell them otherwise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 12:46:17 AM
Quote from: Que on July 04, 2021, 12:28:33 AM
Same here. Mask requirements largely have been lifted a week ago. Even though there is still scientific debate whether these low-grade masks actually reduce risks in a significant way, in the public mind this is an "all clear" sign and people start behaving as if nothing ever happened and we not in the midst of a pandemic anymore.

People want it to be over, so they have decided it is over. And cowardly politicians do not dare to tell them otherwise.

I don't care about masks really (though I hate them), what's interesting is that The Telegraph is saying that evidence is that the health system is safe despite the rampant infection rate.  If that's true, that's good news.

What do you think nations should do about the possibility of new nasty variants emerging?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 04, 2021, 01:16:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 12:46:17 AM
I don't care about masks really (though I hate them), what's interesting is that The Telegraph is saying that evidence is that the health system is safe despite the rampant infection rate.  If that's true, that's good news.

Good news for the NHS. The huge focus on hospitalisations is understandable form a crisis management perspective. From a public health perspective we shouldn't overlook that people can still suffer from serious and long term health effects if they catch the disease, even if they do not need to be hospitalised.

QuoteWhat do you think nations should do about the possibility of new nasty variants emerging?

As long as there are hot beds of infection in the world, new dangerous variants will continue to pop up.
The only strategy I can see is containment measures every time this happens, to slow down the spreading of the new variant and to win sufficient time to be able to produce modified vaccines.

This will mean quick and severe travel restrictions and localised lockdowns, something most governments have been extremely reluctant to do. And if they did, it was way too late.

The problem with the general public and average politician is: if a problem is not visible, it is simply not there. Well, by the time you see it, it is too late....  Like with climate change. We live in the age of Simpletons.... ::)

But not all governments are run by idiots - the next dangerous variant might come from Russia:

Quote from: Que on July 03, 2021, 01:59:30 AM
"Germany will close its borders to Russians starting Tuesday to prevent the importation of mutated Covid-19 strains, the German Embassy in Moscow announced."

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/07/03/coronavirus-in-russia-the-latest-news-july-2-a69117
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 04, 2021, 07:08:40 AM

     The 6 most vaccinated US states are Vermont, Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, Rhode Island and New Hampshire. That's all of New England.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 04, 2021, 07:41:13 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 02, 2021, 03:02:16 AM
Sadly a lot of people just can't be without "live" entertainment for a couple of years even if it means prolonged pandemic. Maybe this is an extrovert thing, because as an introvert I can't understand it because I rather watch tv home than go to a stadium with 10.000 other people and I rather listen to my CDs than go to a classical music concert. However, I know extroverts need other people as much as we introverts need to be alone...

A good point and I'd say I'm a mixture of both extrovert and introvert --- probably more introvert than extrovert truth be told. All of my life, I have never liked being around large crowds of people, which why I always avoided music concerts, sporting events (although I'm no fan of sports anyway), movie theaters, etc. Hell, I'm not crazy about going to malls either, but I do like to shop at bookstores to see if I can find the latest issues of classical music magazines. :D I think someone who needs to be around someone all the time is someone who isn't comfortable in their own skin and can't entertain themselves. Their hobby is constant interaction with other people and 'stimulating' conversation. For me, that's fine sometimes, but definitely not all the time. You and I are both lone wolves, Poju. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 10:04:58 AM
Quote from: Que on July 04, 2021, 01:16:39 AM
Good news for the NHS. The huge focus on hospitalisations is understandable form a crisis management perspective. From a public health perspective we shouldn't overlook that people can still suffer from serious and long term health effects if they catch the disease, even if they do not need to be hospitalised.

As long as there are hot beds of infection in the world, new dangerous variants will continue to pop up.
The only strategy I can see is containment measures every time this happens, to slow down the spreading of the new variant and to win sufficient time to be able to produce modified vaccines.

This will mean quick and severe travel restrictions and localised lockdowns, something most governments have been extremely reluctant to do. And if they did, it was way too late.

The problem with the general public and average politician is: if a problem is not visible, it is simply not there. Well, by the time you see it, it is too late....  Like with climate change. We live in the age of Simpletons.... ::)

But not all governments are run by idiots - the next dangerous variant might come from Russia:

One major problem in the Uk is that state sick pay is very low - years of evil inhuman Tory austerity measures designed to punish cruelly the working classes. And now we have long covid . . .

Re Russia and Germany, I'm not sure closing borders is a good response. I bet there's delta + already there (there is here!)

The UK strategy, a model for the world maybe, is to let infections rise and control hospitalisations with the vaccine. One downside is that there is more virus replication, and hence the probability of undesirable mutations is increased. I'm not at all sure what the best political strategy is to do deal with this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 04, 2021, 01:08:51 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 04, 2021, 07:41:13 AM
A good point and I'd say I'm a mixture of both extrovert and introvert --- probably more introvert than extrovert truth be told. All of my life, I have never liked being around large crowds of people, which why I always avoided music concerts, sporting events (although I'm no fan of sports anyway), movie theaters, etc. Hell, I'm not crazy about going to malls either, but I do like to shop at bookstores to see if I can find the latest issues of classical music magazines. :D I think someone who needs to be around someone all the time is someone who isn't comfortable in their own skin and can't entertain themselves. Their hobby is constant interaction with other people and 'stimulating' conversation. For me, that's fine sometimes, but definitely not all the time. You and I are both lone wolves, Poju. :)

Whether one is an introvert or an extrovert is down to the answer to the question "Do you charge your mental batteries by being by yourself or among other people interacting socially?" I'd say You are definitely an introvert like me. Being an introvert doesn't mean you don't want any interaction with other people. You just have a lower "quota", and social interaction drains your mental battery rather than charges it. If you are not into sports and you are not sporty yourself, you are probably "N" (iNtuition) type rather than "S" (Sensing) type personality. It means the sensory data from your body is not processed as accurately as it it with "S" type of people. That's why for example cold shower may feel extra cold for you or loud sound can annoy you more than others or you may suffer from bright lights more than others. I have definitely problems with cold or warm water on my skin. The range of pleasant water temperature is very narrow for me.

I'm fine with movie theatres, because I am not there to interact with all those other people and nobody expects me to interact with anyone. On the contrary, other people expect me to sit quietly and watch the damn flick! Malls are okay, because I am not expected to interact with anyone else than the cashiers briefly and in Finland (an introverted culture) interaction with the cashier is minimal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 04, 2021, 04:08:56 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 10:04:58 AM
One major problem in the Uk is that state sick pay is very low - years of evil inhuman Tory austerity measures designed to punish cruelly the working classes. And now we have long covid . . .

Re Russia and Germany, I'm not sure closing borders is a good response. I bet there's delta + already there (there is here!)

The UK strategy, a model for the world maybe, is to let infections rise and control hospitalisations with the vaccine. One downside is that there is more virus replication, and hence the probability of undesirable mutations is increased. I'm not at all sure what the best political strategy is to do deal with this.

The UK strategy is really the only viable option. Covid is not going to go away so we have to learn to live with it. This means vaccinations (maybe anually as it continues to mutate) and carrying on as normal. The Australian States approach of elimination is just plain head in the sand crazy. The Kiwis are even worse and have barely started their vaccination program but then again, if their PM had another brain it would be lonely so it's not surprising.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 04, 2021, 07:36:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 04, 2021, 04:08:56 PM
The UK strategy is really the only viable option. Covid is not going to go away so we have to learn to live with it. This means vaccinations (maybe anually as it continues to mutate) and carrying on as normal. The Australian States approach of elimination is just plain head in the sand crazy. The Kiwis are even worse and have barely started their vaccination program but then again, if their PM had another brain it would be lonely so it's not surprising.

The UK strategy is to induce herd immunity by (1) vaccinating adults  and (2) opening up more or less fully while (3) monitoring the new variants which emerge by doing a lot of sequencing. The hope is that the vaccination will prevent the health service being flooded.  One alternative would be to vaccinate the whole population, not just adults. It's not clear to me how parents will react to the way their kids are being used, when it dawns on them what's happening.  Kids can get long covid.

(3) is an important part of it. If your country doesn't have good sequencing capacity then it is kind of playing with fire to let the infection rate become really high.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 05, 2021, 12:53:55 AM
Here as of last week children aged 12-17 are eligible for vaccination. It seems 60-70% of parents will let their children get vaccinated. 16 and 17 year olds are legally allowed to make their own decision in the matter.

I think it is important that teenagers get vaccinated. It's safe, they still run a health risk even it is small and they have been an important factor in the spreading of the infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 03:11:29 AM
Quote from: Que on July 05, 2021, 12:53:55 AM
Here as of last week children aged 12-17 are eligible for vaccination. It seems 60-70% of parents will let their children get vaccinated. 16 and 17 year olds are legally allowed to make their own decision in the matter.

I think it is important that teenagers get vaccinated. It's safe, they still run a health risk even it is small and they have been an important factor in the spreading of the infection.

Part of the issue is whether it's effective to vaccinate children when not all adults have been vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 05, 2021, 09:18:49 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 03:11:29 AM
Part of the issue is whether it's effective to vaccinate children when not all adults have been vaccinated.

Not sure why you think it might not be effective.

If you want to reach a 85-90% vaccination rate it is a necessity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 10:26:10 AM
Quote from: Que on July 05, 2021, 09:18:49 AM
Not sure why you think it might not be effective.

If you want to reach a 85-90% vaccination rate it is a necessity.

I didn't mean that, I just meant that where you have unvaccinated adults it may be better to offer the vaccine to them before you offer it to children.

Anyway, I came here to say that there has just been a difficult and interesting press conference in the UK and I think you should watch it if you want to get a glimpse at what the world will look like living with delta.

It seems to me that the main message was that they are hoping to be able to let the country have a period of "freedom" from July 19th, and that it will continue until the end of the summer. They will then review this with an eye to reinstating some covid legislation.

There was some discussion about how they expect cases and hospitalisations to grow. It seems clear that they think that the school holidays will make the growth in new cases slow down significantly -- the term they use is "firebreak"

Whitty (the Chief Medical Officer for England) said their projections show that there will be a natural peak in the epidemic, and that this will happen before the NHS is stressed to the same levels as it was in January. Can someone explain to me why there will be a "natural peak?"

Whitty also said that he thought opening up now is better in terms of impact on the hospital system than opening up in Autumn, when more adults are vaccinated. Again, I don't understand why that should be. Can someone explain? His words were

QuoteGoing in the summer has some advantages, all other things being equal, to opening up in the autumn when schools are going back and we're heading into the winter period and the NHS tends to be under greatest pressure for many other reasons.

https://www.youtube.com/v/9C0vDBb1USI&ab_channel=10DowningStreet
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 05, 2021, 03:21:13 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 10:26:10 AM
I didn't mean that, I just meant that where you have unvaccinated adults it may be better to offer the vaccine to them before you offer it to children.

I see. Well, that is not the case: everybody else already got the opportunity to be scheduled for vaccination before teenagers. Though in hindsight I wonder whether it was such a smart idea to keep the teenagers for last, given the ease and speed in which they infected each other and subsequently other generations within their families. I'm sure epidemiologists will do some research on that.

QuoteAnyway, I came here to say that there has just been a difficult and interesting press conference in the UK and I think you should watch it if you want to get a glimpse at what the world will look like living with delta.

It seems to me that the main message was that they are hoping to be able to let the country have a period of "freedom" from July 19th, and that it will continue until the end of the summer. They will then review this with an eye to reinstating some covid legislation.

There was some discussion about how they expect cases and hospitalisations to grow. It seems clear that they think that the school holidays will make the growth in new cases slow down significantly -- the term they use is "firebreak"

Whitty (the Chief Medical Officer for England) said their projections show that there will be a natural peak in the epidemic, and that this will happen before the NHS is stressed to the same levels as it was in January. Can someone explain to me why there will be a "natural peak?"

Whitty also said that he thought opening up now is better in terms of impact on the hospital system than opening up in Autumn, when more adults are vaccinated. Again, I don't understand why that should be. Can someone explain? His words were

https://www.youtube.com/v/9C0vDBb1USI&ab_channel=10DowningStreet

What I get from that is that your govt is accepting a certain number - a higher number - of infections, because they prefer to have infections spread out over time instead of having them concentrated after the summer with a (higher) peak in autumn and winter. School vacations will take away an important factor in the spreading of the virus ("firebreak") and provide a slow down. I guess they take into account that spreading is currently mainly amongst the young. A "natural peak" is the point when the spreading of an infection dies down (like a fire) because a lack of available hosts (fuel) due to immunity.

The approach seems to revert back to the initial UK strategy at the start of the pandemic: forget restrictions, let the epidemic run its natural course. Well, less natural now because a large portion of the population is vaccinated. And new infections will mainly occur amongst the young, so that's OK because most of them will not need hospitalisation. So the NHS is in the clear.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 11:59:30 PM
The minister of Health has just said this

QuoteThis is uncharted territory for anyone, any country in the world. As you go further out, week by week, then the numbers in terms of projections are even less reliable. But I said this in parliament yesterday, that by the time we get to 19 July we would expect the case numbers by then to be at least double what they are now – so around 50,000 new cases a day. As we ease and go into the summer, we expect them to rise significantly and they could go as high as 100,000 case numbers. We want to be very straightforward about this, what we can expect in terms of case numbers. But what matters more than anything is the hospitalisation and death numbers, and that is where the link is really weak.


What interests me is this claim: But what matters more than anything is the hospitalisation and death numbers, In particular, what should a state do about new variants emerging?

School holidays begin 26 July here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 06, 2021, 12:24:36 AM
There's also a bit of good news for the world in this morning's Guardian, which says

QuoteEarlier on Sky News, Javid said that the rising case numbers are only leading to 1/30th of the level of hospitalisations as they were before the vaccination programme.

Before vaccinations, hospitalisations were at about 8 or 9% of cases. So now they are at about 0.3%. If that's right, the UK strategy looks doable to me, as far as the impact of delta on hospitals is concerned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 06, 2021, 06:25:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 05, 2021, 11:59:30 PM
The minister of Health has just said this

What interests me is this claim: But what matters more than anything is the hospitalisation and death numbers,

It is abundantly clear that that is the sole concern of the UK govt. Nevertheless: lifting restrictions when the number of infections rises still means additional cases, some with long term health issues, and more hospitalisations - even if the number is sufficiently low to manage.

QuoteIn particular, what should a state do about new variants emerging?

If a variant emerges against which current vaccines are (mostly) ineffective, the whole strategy of letting the epidemic run its natural course falls flat on its face... Though given the numbers,  statistically such a variant is more likely to come from abroad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 06, 2021, 07:34:06 AM
Quote from: Que on July 06, 2021, 06:25:56 AM
Though given the numbers,  statistically such a variant is more likely to come from abroad.

Yes, but you're in Holland. I mean, Britain is abroad for you  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 06, 2021, 07:42:13 AM
Quote from: Que on July 06, 2021, 06:25:56 AM
It is abundantly clear that that is the sole concern of the UK govt

Their primary concern is to get people back to work and spending money. They only care about hospital admissions because pictures of people taking their last gasp in a marquee on a carpark might effect their popularity at election time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 06, 2021, 01:58:15 PM
A point of view from Australia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOJOj3Pmz_s

So, what are your media telling you? The same as us - the number of cases? We got locked down last week because of FOUR cases all of which were mild.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 06, 2021, 02:17:51 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 06, 2021, 01:58:15 PM
A point of view from Australia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOJOj3Pmz_s

So, what are your media telling you? The same as us - the number of cases? We got locked down last week because of FOUR cases all of which were mild.
I haven't checked out your youtube link [yet], but 4 mild cases causing lockdown?  And how severely?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 06, 2021, 11:54:08 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 06, 2021, 01:58:15 PM
A point of view from Australia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOJOj3Pmz_s

So, what are your media telling you? The same as us - the number of cases? We got locked down last week because of FOUR cases all of which were mild.

With a low number of cases, a "track and trace" strategy is not only less disruptive but also much more effective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 08, 2021, 04:08:48 AM
Quote from: Holden on July 06, 2021, 01:58:15 PM
A point of view from Australia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOJOj3Pmz_s

So, what are your media telling you? The same as us - the number of cases? We got locked down last week because of FOUR cases all of which were mild.
Just heard that they're cutting travel to Australia by 50%.   :(  Wonder whether athletes like Ash Barty will be able to return home anytime in the near future?  Forget how long she's been away from home.  Just saw an article that she might not return until the end of 2021.  That has to be brutal on her and her coach and their families.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 08, 2021, 05:40:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!
Oh, no!  Hope that she recovers soon and fully.  Was it your son or son-in-law who had it too a number of months ago Jeffrey?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 06:16:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 08, 2021, 05:40:30 AM
Oh, no!  Hope that she recovers soon and fully.  Was it your son or son-in-law who had it too a number of months ago Jeffrey?

PD

Thanks PD - much appreciated. He thinks that he had it before, although there is no concrete evidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 08, 2021, 06:58:09 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!

Sorry to hear about this, Jeffrey. :( I hope for a speedy recovery for her. COVID seems to affect people differently and younger people will certainly have an easier time dealing with it than someone who is in their 50s, 60s, etc. It's also nice that she lives closer to you as well, but, yes, hopefully her husband will take care of her. Send her all my best (even though she doesn't know me), but I do wish her well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 07:41:18 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 08, 2021, 06:58:09 AM
Sorry to hear about this, Jeffrey. :( I hope for a speedy recovery for her. COVID seems to affect people differently and younger people will certainly have an easier time dealing with it than someone who is in their 50s, 60s, etc. It's also nice that she lives closer to you as well, but, yes, hopefully her husband will take care of her. Send her all my best (even though she doesn't know me), but I do wish her well.
I will do John - that's kind of you. Thank you.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 08, 2021, 07:52:32 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 07:41:18 AM
I will do John - that's kind of you. Thank you.
:)

My pleasure. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 08, 2021, 10:53:00 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!

Best wishes to Ellie for a speedy recovery, Jeffrey.  :)

My daughter had it too some 6 weeks ago. Being posted abroad she had no access to a vaccine over there. They just started recently, and they only have the sinovac from China. After her first shot 2 weeks ago she started feeling like she had covid all over again - fever, headaches, joint pains etc. No anosmia, though. She's coming home this week. She's not even sure she'll be allowed in without quarantining as she is not 'fully vaccinated'. Apparently having had covid + a first shot is equivalent to being fully vaxxed, but her sinovac shot might not be recognised here in Canada... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 08, 2021, 10:58:13 AM
Quote from: André on July 08, 2021, 10:53:00 AM
Best wishes to Ellie for a speedy recovery, Jeffrey.  :)

My daughter had it too some 6 weeks ago. Being posted abroad she had no access to a vaccine over there. They just started recently, and they only have the sinovac from China. After her first shot 2 weeks ago she started feeling like she had covid all over again - fever, headaches, joint pains etc. No anosmia, though. She's coming home this week. She's not even sure she'll be allowed in without quarantining as she is not 'fully vaccinated'. Apparently having had covid + a first shot is equivalent to being fully vaxxed, but her sinovac shot might not be recognised here in Canada... ::)
Sorry to hear that about your daughter too!  Hope that all goes as well as it can from here.  Please keep us apprised as to how things go.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 11:32:07 AM
Quote from: André on July 08, 2021, 10:53:00 AM
Best wishes to Ellie for a speedy recovery, Jeffrey.  :)

My daughter had it too some 6 weeks ago. Being posted abroad she had no access to a vaccine over there. They just started recently, and they only have the sinovac from China. After her first shot 2 weeks ago she started feeling like she had covid all over again - fever, headaches, joint pains etc. No anosmia, though. She's coming home this week. She's not even sure she'll be allowed in without quarantining as she is not 'fully vaccinated'. Apparently having had covid + a first shot is equivalent to being fully vaxxed, but her sinovac shot might not be recognised here in Canada... ::)
Many thanks André - hope that your daughter gets back ok.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 11:32:44 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 08, 2021, 10:58:13 AM
Sorry to hear that about your daughter too!  Hope that all goes as well as it can from here.  Please keep us apprised as to how things go.

Best wishes,

PD
+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 08, 2021, 11:43:58 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!

So sorry to hear it. So quickly from elation and celebration to hardship. My best wishes for speedy and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 09, 2021, 10:05:38 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 08, 2021, 11:43:58 AM
So sorry to hear it. So quickly from elation and celebration to hardship. My best wishes for speedy and full recovery.
Very many thanks - much appreciated. At the moment she seems ok. I'm hoping that having had the first dose of her vaccine will help her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 10, 2021, 12:23:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!

The one dose is likely to diminish the effects of the virus significantly. All the best to her!

Here a cocktail of unvaccinated young, lifted restrictions and the rise of the Delta variant caused an unexpected (at least by the govt) spike in infections:

Dutch reimpose COVID curbs as cases jump in young adults (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-idUSKCN2EF10K)


Boris Johnson, take heed... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 10, 2021, 12:40:55 AM
Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 12:23:21 AM
The one dose is likely to diminish the effects of the virus significantly. All the best to her!

Here a cocktail of unvaccinated young, lifted restrictions and the rise of the Delta variant caused an unexpected (at least by the govt) spike in infections:

Dutch reimpose COVID curbs as cases jump in young adults (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-idUSKCN2EF10K)


Boris Johnson, take heed... ::)

We want that to happen here in England. The strategy is to induce infection and consequent natural immunity in young adults and children by encouraging them to go to rammed pubs and go on holiday to Magaluf. The older adults are protected by vaccination. This is known as "hybrid immunity"

It looks as though you have 40% of the population fully vaccinated, we have 65%. Maybe you're not quite ready for the British approach yet.

Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 12:23:21 AM(at least by the govt)

It's so disturbing, it's all manipulation for political and economic reasons. I've been following France and it has been horrific to see how the "Macronie" manipulates events and media. What is happening in Europe was predictable with great confidence two or three months ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 10, 2021, 02:37:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 10, 2021, 12:40:55 AM
We want that to happen here in England. The strategy is to induce infection and consequent natural immunity in young adults and children by encouraging them to go to rammed pubs and go on holiday to Magaluf. The older adults are protected by vaccination. This is known as "hybrid immunity"

Absolute madness.

Youngsters are willfully exposed to the risks of long civid or worse, even if the chance for the need for hospitalisation is very slim in comparison to other groups. And those that are not fully vacinnated are also running risks. And then there is the group of unvaccinated, some of which cannot be vaccinated for health reasons or do not want to out of conviction or ignorance.

Are we realy going to sacrifice the health of these people while full vaccination is only a few months away? F*$k the frail and the poorly educated? ???


QuoteIt's so disturbing, it's all manipulation for political and economic reasons. I've been following France and it has been horrific to see how the "Macronie" manipulates events and media. What is happening in Europe was predictable with great confidence two or three months ago.

Agreed. Cowardly behaviour in the fear of loosing the next election.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 10, 2021, 02:48:59 AM
I'm not looking to defend the British strategy, I just want to examine it in the cold light of day to understand what it is. When I'm clear about that I'll be ready to judge it both morally and medically.

Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 02:37:43 AM

Youngsters are willfully exposed to the risks of long civid or worse, even if the chance for the need for hospitalisation is very slim in comparison to other groups.


It's their choice to go to crowded events, and they can hardly deny that they have been warned of the risks. In this way, the government seek to absolve themselves of any moral culpability. They'll take the cost of treating the long covid on the chin.

Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 02:37:43 AM

And those that are not fully vacinnated are also running risks. And then there is the group of unvaccinated, some of which cannot be vaccinated for health reasons or do not want to out of conviction or ignorance.

Are we realy going to sacrifice the health of these people while full vaccination is only a few months away? F*$k the frail and the poorly educated? ???


These people probably don't vote Tory, so their value in the Government's calculations is heavily discounted. The rentier classes are safely vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 10, 2021, 02:52:59 AM
Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 12:23:21 AM
The one dose is likely to diminish the effects of the virus significantly. All the best to her!

Here a cocktail of unvaccinated young, lifted restrictions and the rise of the Delta variant caused an unexpected (at least by the govt) spike in infections:

Dutch reimpose COVID curbs as cases jump in young adults (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-idUSKCN2EF10K)


Boris Johnson, take heed... ::)
Sorry to hear the bad news Que!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 10, 2021, 03:18:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 10, 2021, 02:48:59 AM
I'm not looking to defend the British strategy, I just want to examine it in the cold light of day to understand what it is. When I'm clear about that I'll be ready to judge it both morally and medically.

Not to worry, that was clear. :)

QuoteIt's their choice to go to crowded events, and they can hardly deny that they have been warned of the risks. In this way, the government seek to absolve themselves of any moral culpability. They'll take the cost of treating the long covid on the chin.

The young are taking risks they shouldn't, but then they are young and are led on by wrong signals.

QuoteThese people probably don't vote Tory, so their value in the Government's calculations is heavily discounted. The rentier classes are safely vaccinated.

I'm sure there are still many Tory voters amongst those only partly vaccinated.  When it turns out a single dose isn't enough for a fair amount of them, and indications are it isn't, and the number of infections spikes, then the political sh#t will it the fan...

The poorly educated need more persuasion and targeted information campaigns, which takes time and effort. It's immoral to throw them under the bus. But I guess that depends on one's view on government vs individual responsibility.

My position is that these are complicated matters that a lot of people find hard to understand. Meanwhile they are bombarded by deliberate misinformation on social media. A government is responsible for the well being of everyone, not just for those who are able to figure it out by themselves. Perhaps a paternalistic approach to government, but there it is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 10, 2021, 03:22:59 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/allthecitizens


Absolutely wonderful video with Richard Horton, a Lancet journalist, talking about uncertainty, and experiment, on the above  tweet. One of the best things I've heard in a long time - apart from one thing.

At the end he says that the Uk Government's approach isn't about science, data, it's about ideology. Of course it can be about both - science giving the Government the tools to implement an ideologically driven strategy.

All policy is ideological. There is no such thing as being "data driven" Discuss. (good topic for a paper there.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 11, 2021, 12:54:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 10, 2021, 02:52:59 AM
Sorry to hear the bad news Que!

PD

There is a delay, so the real damage will be apparent in a week or so. The govt jumped the gun too early with 72% of the population that had received vaccination, but only 41% fully vaccinated. Politicians succumbed to public pressure and were blinded by rapid declines in number of cases.

Summer holidays in July is a very big thing here, and for the past 6 months promises were made that everything would return to normal by that time. I guess stupid promises lead to stupid decisions...

They underestimated the mix of "letting loose" mostly unvaccinated youngsters and a highly contagious Delta variant.
There was an incident in a nightclub were 165 people were infected in a single night.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 11, 2021, 01:14:11 AM
Quote from: Que on July 10, 2021, 12:23:21 AM
Dutch reimpose COVID curbs as cases jump in young adults (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-idUSKCN2EF10K)


Boris Johnson, take heed... ::)


Freedom day? Boris Johnson faces a tough call as Covid cases soar (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/11/freedom-day-boris-johnson-faces-a-tough-call-as-covid-cases-soar)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 11, 2021, 01:42:28 AM
Quote from: Que on July 11, 2021, 01:14:11 AM

Freedom day? Boris Johnson faces a tough call as Covid cases soar (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/11/freedom-day-boris-johnson-faces-a-tough-call-as-covid-cases-soar)

The Guardian is terrible, they love to make people panic with headlines which are really just click bate.  The head honcho of the NHS in an interview on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme last week didn't look at all concerned.

This is an interesting and bold suggestion  -- hope I don't have to go to hospital for anything.

Health workers to be spared self-isolation rules as NHS faces staffing crisis

Quote

   Downing Street said NHS staff may be exempted from rules that require them to quarantine after close contact with an infected person, amid fears that widespread staff absences could undermine attempts to clear a mountainous backlog of treatment alongside battling coronavirus


https://www.ft.com/content/bb487d6f-2b3b-444c-a3ac-b99756643bf6
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 11, 2021, 03:36:08 AM
Quote from: Que on July 11, 2021, 12:54:09 AM
There is a delay, so the real damage will be apparent in a week or so. The govt jumped the gun too early with 72% of the population that had received vaccination, but only 41% fully vaccinated. Politicians succumbed to public pressure and were blinded by rapid declines in number of cases.

Summer holidays in July is a very big thing here, and for the past 6 months promises were made that everything would return to normal by that time. I guess stupid promises lead to stupid decisions...

They underestimated the mix of "letting loose" mostly unvaccinated youngsters and a highly contagious Delta variant.
There was an incident in a nightclub were 165 people were infected in a single night.
165 people?!   ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 11, 2021, 04:00:09 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 11, 2021, 01:42:28 AM
The Guardian is terrible, they love to make people panic with headlines which are really just click bate.  The head honcho of the NHS in an interview on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme last week didn't look at all concerned.

This is an interesting and bold suggestion  -- hope I don't have to go to hospital for anything.

I don't think calling the decision on lifting restrictions "a though call" is alarmist.
The article was taken from The Observer BTW.

As to the rise on COVID related numbers - they speak for themselves: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Whether it is wise to ease restrictions under these conditions and what any possible ramifications might be, time will tell.

I hope neither of us will have to go to the hospital! 8)

But I can't wait to get my 2nd Pfizer shot, I can tell you.
Amidst all these reassurances and downplaying of risks, you would almost think I don't need it anymore...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 11, 2021, 04:29:54 AM
Had zero side effects of my 2nd Pfizer as well, it was 16 days ago.

Virus had a slight rise here in DK, now generally going a bit down again.

Typically 0.4 -0.8 % positive among the tests on a given day; that is, between 400 - 800 persons. Very varying local interpretations of likely future scenarios.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 11, 2021, 06:50:42 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 08, 2021, 04:33:06 AM
My daughter, who lives in London, has tested positive for Coronavirus. She has had one dose of vaccine, so hopefully that will stand her in good stead. She says that she feels unwell and has completely lost her sense of taste/smell but said that it is currently not as bad as having the flu. At least she has her nice new husband to look after her!

Hoping she mends rapidly, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 11, 2021, 07:22:07 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 11, 2021, 06:50:42 AM
Hoping she mends rapidly, Jeffrey!

Yes, same here, of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 12, 2021, 05:43:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 11, 2021, 06:50:42 AM
Hoping she mends rapidly, Jeffrey!

+1 to this!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 12, 2021, 06:24:16 AM
Boston City Hall, the ugliest edifice in town, is open to the public again five days a week, no prior appointment necessary. Another step back towards normal.
FWIW, the facility where I go for OT has signage requiring masks even if one has been vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 12, 2021, 06:39:12 AM
The UK government have been explaining the new rules for England:

"Health Minister Edward Argar said he would continue to carry a mask even if the legal requirement ended on 19 July as expected. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme there would be "clear and strong guidance", with people having to make their own judgements on when to wear masks. He added that rail companies could still impose their own requirements on mask-wearing once the national regulations ended".

That's all sorted then. ::)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57797657 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57797657)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 12, 2021, 07:51:55 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 12, 2021, 06:39:12 AM
The UK government have been explaining the new rules for England:

"Health Minister Edward Argar said he would continue to carry a mask even if the legal requirement ended on 19 July as expected. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme there would be "clear and strong guidance", with people having to make their own judgements on when to wear masks. He added that rail companies could still impose their own requirements on mask-wearing once the national regulations ended".

That's all sorted then. ::)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57797657 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57797657)

I really think that all the media emphasis on face coverings is a deliberate strategy to divert attention from measures which really would be effective - ventilation, work from home, sick pay for isolators for example - but which are costly for the capitalist class to implement. Covering your face in a random way with a random bit of rag, as far as I know, won't stop you transmitting enough delta to cause a symptomatic illness.

Forget the kerfuffle about face rags, there are more important things to be addressing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 12, 2021, 01:16:25 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 12, 2021, 07:51:55 AM
I really think that all the media emphasis on face coverings is a deliberate strategy to divert attention from measures which really would be effective - ventilation, work from home, sick pay for isolators for example - but which are costly for the capitalist class to implement. Covering your face in a random way with a random bit of rag, as far as I know, won't stop you transmitting enough delta to cause a symptomatic illness.

Forget the kerfuffle about face rags, there are more important things to be addressing.

Excellent points
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 13, 2021, 01:01:10 AM
As the implications of the UK plan becomes clearer it's interesting that no one here is saying that we should reverse the exit, install enough NPIs to control it until a much larger part of the population is vaccinated. Everyone just assumes that the role of the state is to provide maximal opportunity for the wheels of commerce to turn, offering just enough security to give citizens the confidence to work and spend.

Once again, there is no serious opposition, there is basically total agreement with some bickering about the details. How did this hegemony happen?

We may see a different approach in America and Europe, not because of anything principled, but because of the time it will take to get their population to a high level of vaccination - they will hit winter with all that means for pneumonia etc. I'm curious about what the yanks and the continentals think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 13, 2021, 09:22:29 AM
Quote from: Que on July 03, 2021, 01:02:32 AM
(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w25_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_1.png?itok=49JM8-Yy)

The map of Europe is clearing up, with the exception of Portugal, Spain and the UK (no data on map). The rise of the Delta variant is a big factor in this.

The fear is that this summer Mediterranean beaches full of unvaccinated teenagers will generate another wave of infections. It's a race between vaccinations and the Delta variant - countries with a low/slow vaccination rate could get into trouble again.


(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w26_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=hgUthkMB)

Trouble ahead in Spain and Portugal and, as we now know, The Netherlands...

And let's not forget the UK: rising numbers in the run up to "Freedom Day" (cough, cough)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 13, 2021, 09:38:29 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 13, 2021, 01:01:10 AM
As the implications of the UK plan becomes clearer it's interesting that no one here is saying that we should reverse the exit, install enough NPIs to control it until a much larger part of the population is vaccinated. Everyone just assumes that the role of the state is to provide maximal opportunity for the wheels of commerce to turn, offering just enough security to give citizens the confidence to work and spend.

Once again, there is no serious opposition, there is basically total agreement with some bickering about the details. How did this hegemony happen?

We may see a different approach in America and Europe, not because of anything principled, but because of the time it will take to get their population to a high level of vaccination - they will hit winter with all that means for pneumonia etc. I'm curious about what the yanks and the continentals think.


Waiting on herd immunity in the US, with such entrenched MAGA-zoid anti-vaccine foolishness, would be disastrous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 13, 2021, 09:51:49 AM
Quote from: Que on July 13, 2021, 09:22:29 AM

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w26_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=hgUthkMB)

Trouble ahead in Spain and Portugal and, as we now know, The Netherlands...

And let's not forget the UK: rising numbers in the run up to "Freedom Day" (cough, cough)
Thank you for the updates Que.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 13, 2021, 09:38:29 AM
Waiting on herd immunity in the US, with such entrenched MAGA-zoid anti-vaccine foolishness, would be disastrous.
I'm still concerned about vaccination rates in the US.  For example, there was recent news story talking about how Missouri and Arkansas had quite lower numbers of vaccination rates than in other states.   :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 13, 2021, 11:24:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 13, 2021, 09:51:49 AM
Thank you for the updates Que.
I'm still concerned about vaccination rates in the US.  For example, there was recent news story talking about how Missouri and Arkansas had quite lower numbers of vaccination rates than in other states.   :(

You'll have to start providing incentives to vaccinate, or disincentives to not vaccinate. There is no option. Anywhere with delta dominant and large numbers of unvaxed people either accepts piles and piles of dead bodies or locks down hard and for a long long long time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 14, 2021, 04:13:54 AM
For several consecutive days, numbers of infected going up here in DK, which was also expected - above 1,000 daily cases, and a positive percentage of 1-2 % of tested people. Cases are mainly in the younger groups, due to the vaccination rate, and also in quasi-ghetto/immigrant groups with illiterate people etc.
Generally, the mood is that it's not a very worrying development though, since severe cases are still few, so far. But holiday destinations/travels are likely to be restricted further.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2021, 04:42:13 AM
I wonder how much Fourth of July celebrations lead to spikes in new cases?

I found this article on CNN which is updated regularly showing (by week though you can adjust it) the number of new cases by state, deaths, trends and also (in shades of orange and red) the counties with the worst infections rates:

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/health/coronavirus-us-maps-and-cases/

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 04:54:13 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 13, 2021, 09:51:49 AM
Thank you for the updates Que.
I'm still concerned about vaccination rates in the US.  For example, there was recent news story talking about how Missouri and Arkansas had quite lower numbers of vaccination rates than in other states.   :(

I'm not concerned at all.  Just one of the things that Trump and Trumpers have robbed me of is my humanity:  if the Delta variant takes more Republiguns off the voter rolls so much the better. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on July 14, 2021, 04:57:51 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 04:54:13 AM
I'm not concerned at all.  Just one of the things that Trump and Trumpers have robbed me of is my humanity: if the Delta variant takes more Republiguns off the voter rolls so much the better.

Well said
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:06:23 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on July 14, 2021, 04:57:51 AM
Well said

Well, I'm embarrassed to have said it, must be I have a little humanity left...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:17:17 AM
This, my friends, is the USA today:  "Tennessee's top immunization official suggested some teenagers might be eligible for vaccinations without parental consent. Then she lost her job." https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/13/us/michelle-fiscus-tennessee-vaccine.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210714&instance_id=35258&nl=the-morning&regi_id=79376509&segment_id=63381&te=1&user_id=f68579435a3785b48905035b454f0c5c
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on July 14, 2021, 05:23:09 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:17:17 AM
This, my friends, is the USA today:  "Tennessee's top immunization official suggested some teenagers might be eligible for vaccinations without parental consent. Then she lost her job." https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/13/us/michelle-fiscus-tennessee-vaccine.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210714&instance_id=35258&nl=the-morning&regi_id=79376509&segment_id=63381&te=1&user_id=f68579435a3785b48905035b454f0c5c

Unfortunately I cannot read it without subscribing, but what I read is a very serious issue, one that would never occur in my country. Where is the freedom of opinion, well you may have it but it carries consequences. America land of restricted freedom, especially in the South.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:59:33 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on July 14, 2021, 05:23:09 AM
Unfortunately I cannot read it without subscribing, but what I read is a very serious issue, one that would never occur in my country. Where is the freedom of opinion, well you may have it but it carries consequences. America land of restricted freedom, especially in the South.

This covers it : https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/13/1015742588/tennessees-ousted-vaccination-chief-blasts-politics-over-teen-vaccines
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 06:01:11 AM
Funny and fun NPR headline:  "The French Rush For Vaccines After They're Told They'll Need Them To Go To Cafes" https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/13/1015591406/french-people-rush-for-vaccines-after-macron-ties-a-new-health-pass-to-cafe-life
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 14, 2021, 07:00:52 AM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 06:01:11 AM
Funny and fun NPR headline:  "The French Rush For Vaccines After They're Told They'll Need Them To Go To Cafes" https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/13/1015591406/french-people-rush-for-vaccines-after-macron-ties-a-new-health-pass-to-cafe-life

From « I can't be bothered » to « I need this ! «  in a jiffy  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 14, 2021, 07:04:06 AM
Thank you for those two links S.B.

I feel for that vaccination chief who was fired.   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 14, 2021, 07:13:40 AM
Just some preliminary ideas about some of the things happening in the UK  -- especially the way the Government has used mask fetishism as a diversionary tactic, and the way the opposition has engaged with the debate about lifting restrictions.

In the epidemic, the least well off have suffered the most and the most well off have suffered the least. COVID has exposed the social injustices of capitalism starkly to view. It seemed possible that, at last, there would be a movement for fairness.

However this has not happened. No political or popular force is seeking radical change. Capitalism has responded to the crisis skilfully and has, as far as I can see, succeeded in preserving itself.

I conclude that the epidemic is in fact a minor event, not a revolutionary event. Everything will soon go back to being more or less as it was before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 14, 2021, 08:46:18 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 14, 2021, 07:13:40 AM
Everything will soon go back to being more or less as it was before.

Including the worsening climate change, but people will be too busy bickering about masks to bother much about that. :(

Waterstones says it will encourage its customers to continue wearing face coverings in its stores after they cease to be compulsory after 19 July... Managing director James Daunt told the BBC this would be communicated by signs, but staff would not enforce this: "If you are wearing a mask and you don't want to be in the company with someone who isn't wearing a mask, we expect people will use their common sense and move away."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57832560 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57832560)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 14, 2021, 12:46:05 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 04:54:13 AM
I'm not concerned at all.  Just one of the things that Trump and Trumpers have robbed me of is my humanity:  if the Delta variant takes more Republiguns off the voter rolls so much the better.

Wanting people dead because of their political views - where have I heard that before?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2021, 12:59:01 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:17:17 AM
This, my friends, is the USA today:  "Tennessee's top immunization official suggested some teenagers might be eligible for vaccinations without parental consent. Then she lost her job." https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/13/us/michelle-fiscus-tennessee-vaccine.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210714&instance_id=35258&nl=the-morning&regi_id=79376509&segment_id=63381&te=1&user_id=f68579435a3785b48905035b454f0c5c

On a personal note, I know a young lady in TN who would like to get the vaccine, but her MAGA-zoid parents refuse to consent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 02:21:05 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 14, 2021, 12:46:05 PM
Wanting people dead because of their political views - where have I heard that before?

There is a difference between "wanting people dead" and seeing some poetic justice in their deaths as a result of their own flagrant stupidity (and, I might add, astonishing selfishness in permitting Covid to continue to infect and evolve).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 03:48:31 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 14, 2021, 12:59:01 PM
On a personal note, I know a young lady in TN who would like to get the vaccine, but her MAGA-zoid parents refuse to consent.

Horace, Odes: "For the sins of your fathers you, though guiltless, must suffer."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2021, 04:00:38 PM
Mass. coronavirus cases are ticking up again. Should you worry? Here's what experts are saying. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/14/nation/mass-coronavirus-cases-are-ticking-up-again-should-you-worry-heres-what-experts-are-saying/?s_campaign=coronavirusnow:newsletter)

Will it be different this time around? Coronavirus case counts and other key metrics are ticking up again in Massachusetts, a distressing development in a state that has already endured massive disruption, illness, and loss of life from the pandemic.

The seven-day average of confirmed coronavirus cases climbed to 141 on Wednesday, up from a low point of 52 it had reached on June 28, according to Department of Public Health data. The seven-day average rate of positive tests has also been edging upward.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 04:13:15 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 14, 2021, 04:00:38 PM
Mass. coronavirus cases are ticking up again. Should you worry? Here's what experts are saying. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/14/nation/mass-coronavirus-cases-are-ticking-up-again-should-you-worry-heres-what-experts-are-saying/?s_campaign=coronavirusnow:newsletter)

Will it be different this time around? Coronavirus case counts and other key metrics are ticking up again in Massachusetts, a distressing development in a state that has already endured massive disruption, illness, and loss of life from the pandemic.

The seven-day average of confirmed coronavirus cases climbed to 141 on Wednesday, up from a low point of 52 it had reached on June 28, according to Department of Public Health data. The seven-day average rate of positive tests has also been edging upward.

Human foolishness virtually assures that it will be bad, likely and unfortunately surpassingly bad.  Here in Missouri (Misery) the cases are proliferating now widely across the state - the Feds have sent a Task Force to our hotspot in Southwest Missouri (where ICUs are filled to overflowing), though why they were sent is perhaps open to question - the victims are the same people who resent 'government interference' in all things.  They're also the same people who socio-pathologically worship weaponry of all kinds - unfortunately they can't shoot the Coronavirus. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 14, 2021, 04:20:41 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 04:13:15 PM
Human foolishness virtually assures that it will be bad, likely and unfortunately surpassingly bad.  Here in Missouri (Misery) the cases are proliferating now widely across the state - the Feds have sent a Task Force to our hotspot in Southwest Missouri (where ICUs are filled to overflowing), though why they were sent is perhaps open to question - the victims are the same people who resent 'government interference' in all things.  They're also the same people who socio-pathologically worship weaponry of all kinds - unfortunately they can't shoot the Coronavirus.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-10/delta-variant-spills-out-of-midwest-tourist-hub-turned-incubator [Branson, MO]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:39:15 PM
Thank you, T.D. for posting that, did not know Branson was the 'center of attraction' for the Delta, but certainly makes sense.  (I've been in MO for over twenty years and never went, country not being my thing, though I certainly enjoyed two visits to the Country Music Hall of Fame in Nashville). 

I believe Republiguns should be held legally liable for the misinformation they spout about the pandemic.  Anyway, after some forays to several record and CD shops, I think I will start to lay low once again.  I'm more fortunate than many; I'm retired and my wife is still able allowed to work from home, fortunately, except for Fridays when she has to go into the office for various reasons...I suspect that is about to change.  Batten down the hatches; Covid - apparently - is smarter than we are. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2021, 05:44:30 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on July 14, 2021, 05:39:15 PM
Thank you, T.D. for posting that, did not know Branson was the 'center of attraction' for the Delta, but certainly makes sense.  (I've been in MO for over twenty years and never went, country not being my thing, though I certainly enjoyed two visits to the Country Music Hall of Fame in Nashville). 

I believe Republiguns should be held legally liable for the misinformation they spout about the pandemic.  Anyway, after some forays to several record and CD shops, I think I will start to lay low once again.  I'm more fortunate than many; I'm retired and my wife is still able allowed to work from home, fortunately, except for Fridays when she has to go into the office for various reasons...I suspect that is about to change.  Batten down the hatches; Covid - apparently - is smarter than we are. 

Humans grow tired and lazy. The virus doesn't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 15, 2021, 01:16:35 AM
Here in DK, only 1233 of 1.6 mio people with finished vaccinations, or 0.08%, have later gotten a positive virus test, so far.

Shows the efficiency of the vaccines.

After this result, 0.9 mio more people became fully vaccinated.

Delta is currently about 79% of positive tests overall here.

The number of verified infections after the three major Euros soccer games at the Copenhagen Parken stadium, with up to 25,000 spectators for each game, was only 152. Of course, a corona pass was required for entering.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 15, 2021, 02:13:57 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 15, 2021, 01:16:35 AM

The number of verified infections after the three major Euros soccer games at the Copenhagen Parken stadium, with up to 25,000 spectators for each game, was only 152. Of course, a corona pass was required for entering.

That's probably due to the extremely low infection rate in Danmark. Here a pop festival attended by 20.000 resulted in over a thousand confirmed infections....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 15, 2021, 03:46:08 AM
https://www.vpr.org/npr-news/2021-07-15/the-u-s-surgeon-general-is-calling-covid-19-misinformation-an-urgent-threat?ct=t(THE-FREQUENCY-20210715) (https://www.vpr.org/npr-news/2021-07-15/the-u-s-surgeon-general-is-calling-covid-19-misinformation-an-urgent-threat?ct=t(THE-FREQUENCY-20210715))

With about a third of adults in the U.S. still completely unvaccinated, and cases of COVID-19 on the rise, the U.S. Surgeon General is calling for a war against "health misinformation."

On Thursday, Dr. Vivek Murthy is releasing the first Surgeon General's advisory of his time serving in the Biden administration, describing the "urgent threat" posed by the rise of false information around COVID-19 — one that continues to put "lives at risk" and prolong the pandemic.

Murthy says Americans must do their part to fight misinformation.

"COVID has really brought into sharp focus the full extent of damage that health misinformation is doing," Murthy told NPR in an exclusive interview ahead of the advisory's release. Surgeon General's advisories are reserved for significant public health challenges that demand immediate attention.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 05:10:00 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 08, 2021, 11:43:58 AM
So sorry to hear it. So quickly from elation and celebration to hardship. My best wishes for speedy and full recovery.
I'm pleased to say that she is feeling better now and 'Test and Trace' have allowed her to go out again today after a period of quarantine.
Thanks again for your kind thoughts (and to others who expressed concern as well).
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 15, 2021, 05:17:10 AM
That is very nice to read about  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 15, 2021, 05:19:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 14, 2021, 12:59:01 PM
On a personal note, I know a young lady in TN who would like to get the vaccine, but her MAGA-zoid parents refuse to consent.
I'm so sorry to hear that Karel.  I thought from what I saw in that article, that she could be legally allowed to get the shot?  How old is she?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 15, 2021, 05:22:47 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 05:10:00 AM
I'm pleased to say that she is feeling better now and 'Test and Trace' have allowed her to go out again today after a period of quarantine.
Thanks again for your kind thoughts (and to others who expressed concern as well).
:)
Yeah!  :)

Good to hear that Jeffrey!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 06:37:28 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 15, 2021, 05:22:47 AM
Yeah!  :)

Good to hear that Jeffrey!

PD

Thank you guys - much appreciated  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 15, 2021, 06:47:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 05:10:00 AM
I'm pleased to say that she is feeling better now and 'Test and Trace' have allowed her to go out again today after a period of quarantine.
Thanks again for your kind thoughts (and to others who expressed concern as well).
:)

Very good to hear this!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 15, 2021, 07:04:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 05:10:00 AM
I'm pleased to say that she is feeling better now and 'Test and Trace' have allowed her to go out again today after a period of quarantine.
Thanks again for your kind thoughts (and to others who expressed concern as well).
:)

Very good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 15, 2021, 07:05:11 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 15, 2021, 05:19:25 AM
I'm so sorry to hear that Karel.  I thought from what I saw in that article, that she could be legally allowed to get the shot?  How old is she?

PD

Not yet 18, so her hands are tied.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 15, 2021, 07:18:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 13, 2021, 11:24:39 AM
You'll have to start providing incentives to vaccinate, or disincentives to not vaccinate. There is no option. Anywhere with delta dominant and large numbers of unvaxed people either accepts piles and piles of dead bodies or locks down hard and for a long long long time.

Let them show the courage of their convictions. It is a free country and if you choose not to be vaccinated, fine. As long as you are prepared to give up foreign holidays, visits to theatres, sporting events and festivals. Perhaps the day is not too far off that pubs, hotels and restaurants are not welcoming to the folk who choose not to be vaccinated. Bring it on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 15, 2021, 07:27:53 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 15, 2021, 07:18:13 AM
Let them show the courage of their convictions. It is a free country and if you choose not to be vaccinated, fine. As long as you are prepared to give up foreign holidays, visits to theatres, sporting events and festivals. Perhaps the day is not too far off that pubs, hotels and restaurants are not welcoming to the folk who choose not to be vaccinated. Bring it on.

I'd be very interested to know what Florestan has to say about this, as far as I know he is the only one here who is from a culture with the memory of a totalitarian regime. Is Europe sleepwalking into a strong regimentation of society?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 15, 2021, 07:58:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 15, 2021, 07:27:53 AM
I'd be very interested to know what Florestan has to say about this, as far as I know he is the only one here who is from a culture with the memory of a totalitarian regime. Is Europe sleepwalking into a strong regimentation of society?

A right-wing friend of mine has decried the door-to-door solicitation to consider vaccination "Big Brother" which I am inclined to think ideological hyperbole. But of course I live in a vaccine-sane state.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 15, 2021, 09:39:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 15, 2021, 07:58:04 AM
A right-wing friend of mine has decried the door-to-door solicitation to consider vaccination "Big Brother" which I am inclined to think ideological hyperbole. But of course I live in a vaccine-sane state.

Well I'd love to live in a society where the government had only our best interests at heart and based their decisions on indisputable and unbiased scientific facts, but what if I have reasons to believe otherwise? :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 10:13:04 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 15, 2021, 06:47:11 AM
Very good to hear this!
Much appreciated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on July 15, 2021, 10:13:56 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 15, 2021, 07:04:30 AM
Very good!
Thanks Karl.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 15, 2021, 10:25:51 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 15, 2021, 09:39:27 AM
Well I'd love to live in a society where the government had only our best interests at heart and based their decisions on indisputable and unbiased scientific facts, but what if I have reasons to believe otherwise? :-\

No lack of reasons.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 15, 2021, 12:58:38 PM
Quote from: krummholz on July 15, 2021, 03:46:08 AM
https://www.vpr.org/npr-news/2021-07-15/the-u-s-surgeon-general-is-calling-covid-19-misinformation-an-urgent-threat?ct=t(THE-FREQUENCY-20210715) (https://www.vpr.org/npr-news/2021-07-15/the-u-s-surgeon-general-is-calling-covid-19-misinformation-an-urgent-threat?ct=t(THE-FREQUENCY-20210715))

With about a third of adults in the U.S. still completely unvaccinated, and cases of COVID-19 on the rise, the U.S. Surgeon General is calling for a war against "health misinformation."

On Thursday, Dr. Vivek Murthy is releasing the first Surgeon General's advisory of his time serving in the Biden administration, describing the "urgent threat" posed by the rise of false information around COVID-19 — one that continues to put "lives at risk" and prolong the pandemic.

Murthy says Americans must do their part to fight misinformation.

"COVID has really brought into sharp focus the full extent of damage that health misinformation is doing," Murthy told NPR in an exclusive interview ahead of the advisory's release. Surgeon General's advisories are reserved for significant public health challenges that demand immediate attention.

Good luck with that - facts don't sell newspapers. Also, I'd remove the word 'health' and leave the phrase as simply misinformation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 15, 2021, 04:44:33 PM
More from the "Show Me" state:

Missouri Asked to Help Contain Outbreak (10:43 a.m. NY)

Health officials in southwest Missouri asked the state to set up an "alternate site" to handle overflowing hospitalizations caused by a spike in new virus cases. The state is one of the worst hit by the delta variant, particularly around the city of Springfield and surrounding Greene County.

"Today, there are 231 patients being treated in Greene County hospitals with Covid-19, 104 of those are in critical care and 61 are on ventilators," read a statement released Wednesday night by officials from the city, county and three health care networks. "Greene County is averaging more than 196 cases per day, and the increase in severe illness is projected to outpace hospital capacity."


https://www.springfieldmo.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=8442
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 16, 2021, 08:29:02 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/R7q8Dcp/Ex440q-NXAAU7km-Y.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 16, 2021, 10:11:34 PM
Basically all media here in DK having the 1200 international experts warning against the UK re-opening on Monday as a danger to the world, as front page news, considering the 51,000 daily British cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 16, 2021, 11:59:31 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 16, 2021, 10:11:34 PM
Basically all media here in DK having the 1200 international experts warning against the UK re-opening on Monday as a danger to the world, as front page news, considering the 51,000 daily British cases.

The 51K is not cases, it's positive test results. That's not a guide to cases because not everyone gets tested and the tests include false positives. By the way, just to make you feel better, the doubling time is 14 days so we'll be at 100K positive test results by the end of the month. Growth in August may be less rapid because schools have just closed here, and anyway, possibly the virus is running out of fuel.

The "danger to the world" is from the emergence of an undesirable uncontainable new variant which has attributes which make it dominant. I have not found any information on the probability of this happening and for all I know it may be vanishingly small. And my understanding of risk management isn't sufficient to help me judge whether the UK is doing the best thing for themselves or the best tout court. The most I can say is that it's complex.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 17, 2021, 12:14:31 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 16, 2021, 11:59:31 PM
The 51K is not cases, it's positive test results. That's not a guide to cases because not everyone gets tested and the tests include false positives. By the way, just to make you feel better, the doubling time is 14 days so we'll be at 100K positive test results by the end of the month. Growth in August may be less rapid because schools have just closed here, and anyway, possibly the virus is running out of fuel.

The "danger to the world" is from the emergence of an undesirable uncontainable new variant which has attributes which make it dominant. I have not found any information on the probability of this happening and for all I know it may be vanishingly small. And my understanding of risk management isn't sufficient to help me judge whether the UK is doing the best thing for themselves or the best tout court. The most I can say is that it's complex.

Correct. An interesting correlation between positive tests and hospital admissions.

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 17, 2021, 12:16:08 AM
Got interested in the UK press coverage of the 1200 experts letter of warning in The Lancet; as of now, The Guardian, FT, and The Express introductory websites cover it, whereas The Times, The Telegraph and The Daily Mail apparently don't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 01:32:02 AM
Beta variant anyone?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/16/quarantine-to-remain-for-vaccinated-uk-travellers-returning-from-france
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:14:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 16, 2021, 11:59:31 PM
The "danger to the world" is from the emergence of an undesirable uncontainable new variant which has attributes which make it dominant. I have not found any information on the probability of this happening and for all I know it may be vanishingly small. And my understanding of risk management isn't sufficient to help me judge whether the UK is doing the best thing for themselves or the best tout court. The most I can say is that it's complex.

The combination of a lot of vaccinated (immune) with a high number of infections propagates possible vaccine-resistant strains. This is the natural selection process that makes us catching the flu every year again. And this is why it is so important to keep the number of infections low untill group immunity is reached and the virus dies out. But there are many other places  in the world where this could occur, notably the US where a large portion of the population is refusing to be vaccinated. Much depends on the mutation rate of the virus, which doesn't seem to be low and is excellerated by hundreds of millions of infections worldwide.

Apart from this, the UK govt is willfully exposing the young and those not (fully) vaccinated to serious health risks. With the current knowledge of the effects of the virus, focusing on hospitalisations doesn't give the full picture. The long term costs in health care and reduced productivity of those affected will be substantial.

The UK govt is going to regret this, I think...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:16:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 01:32:02 AM
Beta variant anyone?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/16/quarantine-to-remain-for-vaccinated-uk-travellers-returning-from-france

Yes, I noticed that as well. The irony....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 17, 2021, 02:29:05 AM
Quote from: T. D. on July 15, 2021, 04:44:33 PM
More from the "Show Me" state:

Missouri Asked to Help Contain Outbreak (10:43 a.m. NY)

Health officials in southwest Missouri asked the state to set up an "alternate site" to handle overflowing hospitalizations caused by a spike in new virus cases. The state is one of the worst hit by the delta variant, particularly around the city of Springfield and surrounding Greene County.

"Today, there are 231 patients being treated in Greene County hospitals with Covid-19, 104 of those are in critical care and 61 are on ventilators," read a statement released Wednesday night by officials from the city, county and three health care networks. "Greene County is averaging more than 196 cases per day, and the increase in severe illness is projected to outpace hospital capacity."


https://www.springfieldmo.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=8442
Are there any large music/sports stadiums that could be used?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:34:16 AM
Quote from: Que on July 13, 2021, 09:22:29 AM

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w26_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic_0.png?itok=hgUthkMB)

Trouble ahead in Spain and Portugal and, as we now know, The Netherlands...

And let's not forget the UK: rising numbers in the run up to "Freedom Day" (cough, cough)


(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w27_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=YSY1HjWv)

So, there we go. The Netherlands have turned deep red... Our southern brethren in Belgium turned orange. Luxemburg red as well.

And all the holiday destinations are warming up infection wise. With the French Côte d 'Azur, Croatia (Dalmatian Coast) and Greece joining in with Portugal, Spain, Malta and Cyprus. Somehow Italy is still managing to keep infections low.

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/situation-updates/weekly-maps-coordinated-restriction-free-movement
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 03:57:07 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:14:02 AM
The combination of a lot of vaccinated (immune) with a high number of infections propagates possible vaccine-resistant strains. This is the natural selection process that makes us catching the flu every year again. And this is why it is so important to keep the number of infections low untill group immunity is reached and the virus dies out. But there are many other places in the world where this could occur, notably the US where a large portion of the population is refusing to be vaccinated.

Like I said....

Unvaccinated could be breeding ground for Covid variants, US officials fear (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/17/unvaccinated-coronavirus-covid-variants-us)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 04:24:28 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:14:02 AM
The long term costs in health care and reduced productivity of those affected will be substantial.


We will create a culture where people are expected to work with the symptoms of long covid. Don't forget Britain's proletariat are on zero hours contracts and state sick pay is the lowest in the European continent (I think -- you may have the stats to hand.) 


Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:14:02 AM


The UK govt is going to regret this, I think...

It is being presented, perhaps rightly, as the least bad of a series of bad alternatives. Part of the thinking is that opening later will produce an exit wave with a very long tail  which peaks later -- and the NHS is likely to be under more pressure then from seasonal respiratory diseases. Of course the later you open, the more people are vaccinated. But the models suggested now is better than any other time this year. I can let you have links to the modelling if you want.

One thing to be stressed is that the models were very sensitive, a small change makes a huge difference. And hence everything is complicated and uncertain. It's about risk management.

What was off the agenda, never investigated by the epidemiologists, was removing all NPIs in Spring or Summer 2022.  That's effectively what the signatories to that Lancet letter mentioned above wanted de facto. (I think their position is half baked, by the way.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 17, 2021, 05:19:45 AM
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/07/17/the-republican-anti-vax-delusion

(https://www.economist.com/img/b/1000/563/90/sites/default/files/20210717_USD000.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 07:10:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 04:24:28 AM
It is being presented, perhaps rightly, as the least bad of a series of bad alternatives. Part of the thinking is that opening later will produce an exit wave with a very long tail  which peaks later -- and the NHS is likely to be under more pressure then from seasonal respiratory diseases. Of course the later you open, the more people are vaccinated. But the models suggested now is better than any other time this year. I can let you have links to the modelling if you want.

One thing to be stressed is that the models were very sensitive, a small change makes a huge difference. And hence everything is complicated and uncertain. It's about risk management.

I think they're trying to sell the British public a bogus story. The whole "exit wave" theory doesn't make any sense. By the end of the summer vaccinations will have reached their maximum numbers. Which means that after lifting restrictions the number of infections will be very low, or, if group immunity levels can be reached, practically zero.

If you are managing serious risks, you better stick with what you know that works - vaccinations & restrictions - untill dangerous conditions subside. Instead of taking risks with uncertain consequences, like lifting restrictions in the midst of a vaccination exercise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 07:34:04 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 07:10:41 AM
[when] vaccinations will have reached their maximum numbers. [t]his means that after lifting restrictions the number of infections will be very low, or, if group immunity levels can be reached, practically zero.



I think you're wrong to say this. The latest information I have is that vaccinations reduce infections by 75% -- so if R0=8 in an unvaccinated population, R0=2 in a vaccinated population. That means that infections will be growing exponentially after the whole population is vaccinated, if all NPIs are removed. Furthermore not all the population is protected by the vaccine and there are breakthrough cases needing hospital care. This all mounts up when considering a whole country's population. A small percentage of a very large number is a very large number.

If infections peak, all that means is that R≤1. Therefore the people who are already infected will continue to infect, just less than one person (you know what I mean by that!) And then those newly infected people will infect some more . . . . This is an exit wave with a very long tail.

(We've all had to become amateur epidemiologists  :o)

Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 07:10:41 AM


If you are managing serious risks, you better stick with what you know that works - vaccinations & restrictions - untill dangerous conditions subside. Instead of taking risks with uncertain consequences, like lifting restrictions in the midst of a vaccination exercise.

Well, they can always reinstall NPIs -- the important thing is to be measuring what is going on and to react if you need to.  I am prepared to bet you a barrel of the finest maatjesharing that Britain will reintroduce NPIs by the start of October, probably earlier.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 17, 2021, 07:56:59 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 07:10:41 AM
I think they're trying to sell the British public a bogus story. The whole "exit wave" theory doesn't make any sense. By the end of the summer vaccinations will have reached their maximum numbers. Which means that after lifting restrictions the number of infections will be very low, or, if group immunity levels can be reached, practically zero.

If you are managing serious risks, you better stick with what you know that works - vaccinations & restrictions - untill dangerous conditions subside. Instead of taking risks with uncertain consequences, like lifting restrictions in the midst of a vaccination exercise.

I think Mandryka is making the valid point better to bite the bullet now in the high summer then later when other respiratory aliments take hold. Due to lockdown and other measures to fight Covid the population is going to be extremely vulnerable come the winter months. Speaking personally last winter was the first time in my life I have not succumbed to "man flue" otherwise known as the common cold. I have a feeling a price is going to be paid further down the line for this reprieve. As an asthma sufferer, albeit not too bad and there are many worse off, this has to be a consideration.     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 17, 2021, 08:03:42 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 07:34:04 AM
I think you're wrong to say this. The latest information I have is that vaccinations reduce infections by 75% -- so if R0=8 in an unvaccinated population, R0=2 in a vaccinated population. That means that infections will be growing exponentially after the whole population is vaccinated, if all NPIs are removed. Furthermore not all the population is protected by the vaccine and there are breakthrough cases needing hospital care. This all mounts up when considering a whole country's population. A small percentage of a very large number is a very large number.

If infections peak, all that means is that R≤1. Therefore the people who are already infected will continue to infect, just less than one person (you know what I mean by that!) And then those newly infected people will infect some more . . . . This is an exit wave with a very long tail.

(We've all had to become amateur epidemiologists  :o)

What you are basically saying is that vaccinations, even at their optimum in numbers, are insufficiently effective to stop the spreading of the virus. I'm not ready to accept this without any substantial evidence, though AstraZeneca is notably less effective than Pfizer or Moderna. And even assuming this could be true, the more people are vaccinated before infections rise in numbers, the more are protected to some extent or another. The entire narrative the UK govt is trying to sell is rather cynical and defeatist IMO.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 08:12:57 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 08:03:42 AM
What you are basically saying is that vaccinations, even at their optimum in numbers, are insufficiently effective to stop the spreading of the virus. I'm not ready to accept this without any substantial evidence, though AstraZeneca is notably less effective than Pfizer or Moderna. And even assuming this could be true, the more people are vaccinated before infections rise in numbers, the more are protected to some extent or another. The entire narrative the UK govt is trying to sell is rather cynical and defeatist IMO.

The datum of 75% reduction in infections is something I got from not the last UK presser, but the one before, either van Dam or Whitty, I think van Dam. R0=8 for delta.  But even if  R≤1 I have argued that there is inevitably a long tail, i.e. an exit wave.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 17, 2021, 10:14:29 AM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 08:03:42 AM
What you are basically saying is that vaccinations, even at their optimum in numbers, are insufficiently effective to stop the spreading of the virus. I'm not ready to accept this without any substantial evidence, though AstraZeneca is notably less effective than Pfizer or Moderna. And even assuming this could be true, the more people are vaccinated before infections rise in numbers, the more are protected to some extent or another. The entire narrative the UK govt is trying to sell is rather cynical and defeatist IMO.

With the Alpha virus, herd immunity (R <1) was estimated to occur when 60% of the population was immune. With the Delta variant which is much more contagious, the Danish health authorities have calculated that more than 80% of the population must be immune to keep R below 1. And here the coverage of the vaccines also must be taken into account, so that if a vaccine covers only 90%, somewhat more of the population must be vaccinated to get a sufficient degree of herd immunity.This may be impossible to achieve.

The calculations are complicated by the fact, that vaccinated people may contract the virus and spread it to others - albeit probably to a lesser degree than unvaccinated people -also even if they have no symptoms themselves.

So if we can't stop the coronavirus our efforts must be directed towards the prevention of manifest disease (Covid19). So much more reason to get everybody vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 17, 2021, 03:34:36 PM
I've not seen any claims that delta variant has R0 as high as 8. I recall seeing claims that alpha is 2.5 and delta is 4.5, but that number is dependent on people's behavior. I.e., perhaps we are not going back to totally normal behavior yet.

I don't understand the UK's commitment to AstraZeneca. It is it a nationalist thing? It is clearly inferior to the mRNA vaccines in every measurable way (except for the storage requirements). There is no earthly reason anyone should be manufacturing it. The developed world should be producing mRNA vaccines at the fastest rate possible and giving it to everyone on the planet, including people in developing nations. If necessary the government should seize control of the IP and license it to any laboratory competent to manufacture it, on the basis of national security.

Reports I've read indicate that 99% of Covid-19 fatalities in the U.S. are unvaccinated people, and that in Los Angeles country 100% of hospitalized Covid-19 patients are unvaccinated. If we could get vaccine into everyone the pandemic would recede. Perhaps the virus would not be extinguished, but it would be reduced to an endemic nuisance like the flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 17, 2021, 09:27:16 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 17, 2021, 03:34:36 PM

I don't understand the UK's commitment to AstraZeneca.

They're not. But they had it and so used it.

Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 17, 2021, 03:34:36 PM
I've not seen any claims that delta variant has R0 as high as 8. I recall seeing claims that alpha is 2.5 and delta is 4.5, but that number is dependent on people's behavior. I.e., perhaps we are not going back to totally normal behavior yet.


Well everyone says it's more than 4. And if it's true that the vaccines reduce transmissibility by 75% . . .

Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 17, 2021, 03:34:36 PM
If we could get vaccine into everyone the pandemic would recede. Perhaps the virus would not be extinguished, but it would be reduced to an endemic nuisance like the flu.

Possibly not, because of long covid. It also appears to be less seasonal than flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on July 18, 2021, 01:48:42 AM
Restrictions in the UK have already been abandoned by large numbers of people, if they ever bothered with them in the first place. Yesterday Bournemouth beaches and pier were jam-packed with people. When this happened before we were told it didn't matter too much as everyone was outside. This might be true but it doesn't apply to the overcrowded train (standing room only) arriving from London.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 18, 2021, 02:51:04 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 17, 2021, 07:56:59 AM
I think Mandryka is making the valid point better to bite the bullet now in the high summer then later when other respiratory aliments take hold. Due to lockdown and other measures to fight Covid the population is going to be extremely vulnerable come the winter months. Speaking personally last winter was the first time in my life I have not succumbed to "man flue" otherwise known as the common cold. I have a feeling a price is going to be paid further down the line for this reprieve. As an asthma sufferer, albeit not too bad and there are many worse off, this has to be a consideration.   
So sorry to hear that you have to deal with asthma Irons.  I have another friend in her early 70's who has it too (has to use an inhaler).  Perhaps in terms of things like common colds (but also pertaining to other viruses), one tiny positive to come out of all of this horribleness is that hopefully more of us are taking the advice to wash your hands more often and well and mind yourself re touching eyes, mouth and nose when out in public places, and maybe also to be mindful of how you are feeling to protect not just you but in terms of passing along 'bugs' to others?  *Years ago when I visited Japan, I was surprised to see the occasional person with a mask on.  I learned from my friend that they did that not to protect themselves from anything, but to protect others.  I was duly impressed by their respect for society as a whole being more important than individual rights.

*This was over 20 years ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 18, 2021, 04:07:00 AM
Quote from: Biffo on July 18, 2021, 01:48:42 AM
Restrictions in the UK have already been abandoned by large numbers of people, if they ever bothered with them in the first place. Yesterday Bournemouth beaches and pier were jam-packed with people. When this happened before we were told it didn't matter too much as everyone was outside. This might be true but it doesn't apply to the overcrowded train (standing room only) arriving from London.
Eek! Fingers crossed for all of you.

I read a bit earlier today that a few athletes in Tokyo have tested positive for Covid....and the Olympics are due to start in 5 days.  The games will be very strange this year as no spectators allowed.  Apparently, Novak has decided to go (said that he was 50/50 due to no spectators).  Dan Evans is off of Team GB (tested positive for Covid), so Jamie Murray will now be going (playing doubles) and his younger brother Andy will be defending his gold medal.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/57844406

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 18, 2021, 05:14:28 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-18/canada-passes-u-s-in-covid-19-vaccinations-after-slow-start

People with two doses near 50% as supply problem is solved
Surveys show greater willingness to get jab in Canada

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 18, 2021, 05:23:30 PM
Quote from: T. D. on July 18, 2021, 05:14:28 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-18/canada-passes-u-s-in-covid-19-vaccinations-after-slow-start

People with two doses near 50% as supply problem is solved
Surveys show greater willingness to get jab in Canada



Neither of us is really surprised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 19, 2021, 12:43:47 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 17, 2021, 10:14:29 AM
With the Alpha virus, herd immunity (R <1) was estimated to occur when 60% of the population was immune. With the Delta variant which is much more contagious, the Danish health authorities have calculated that more than 80% of the population must be immune to keep R below 1. And here the coverage of the vaccines also must be taken into account, so that if a vaccine covers only 90%, somewhat more of the population must be vaccinated to get a sufficient degree of herd immunity.This may be impossible to achieve.

The calculations are complicated by the fact, that vaccinated people may contract the virus and spread it to others - albeit probably to a lesser degree than unvaccinated people -also even if they have no symptoms themselves.

So if we can't stop the coronavirus our efforts must be directed towards the prevention of manifest disease (Covid19). So much more reason to get everybody vaccinated.

Good points, and I don't rule out that group immunity cannot be reached. But we could get very close. In that case some additional measures/restrictions will have to stay in place to keep the reproduction factor below 1 until the virus will have virtually died out.
I see a New Zealand scenario at the horizon: travel restrictions and monitoring to keep new infections out, combined with vigorous track & tracing to counter local pop ups of the virus.

No reason to throw our hands in the air, like the UK govt does. On the contrary: certain restrictions, but not all, will have to be continued for a prolonged period of time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 19, 2021, 11:12:39 AM
Quote from: Que on July 19, 2021, 12:43:47 AM
Good points, and I don't rule out that group immunity cannot be reached. But we could get very close. In that case some additional measures/restrictions will have to stay in place to keep the reproduction factor below 1 until the virus will have virtually died out.
I see a New Zealand scenario at the horizon: travel restrictions and monitoring to keep new infections out, combined with vigorous track & tracing to counter local pop ups of the virus.

No reason to throw our hands in the air, like the UK govt does. On the contrary: certain restrictions, but not all, will have to be continued for a prolonged period of time.

This precisely covers my opinion, and dare I say, that it is the only rational way to handle the corona situation now? And for the same reason I am - like you - sceptical about the British open-up strategy, even if other parts of the world may be more threatening as to global health.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 19, 2021, 11:43:37 AM
Thoughts on the UK

There are four vectors pulling in different directions -- schools closing and vaccine and natural immunity on the one hand, and vaccines waning and freedom from NPIs on the other. The gamble is that the impact of schools closing will be enough to slow down the growth caused by removing NPIs. And that vaccines won't wane significantly before boosters can be gotten into people's arms.

They will understand the effect of schools reopening by the start of September, by observing Scotland, the schools closed earlier and will open earlier there. By that time they will have a better handle on how naturally cautious people are.

I think people here are tending to exaggerate the health risks, because they can always introduce NPIs again, and they have a reasonable understanding of their effect. If we don't get enough immunity in the community by hook or by crook, that's what they'll do.

The experiment, I think, is precisely there: can they get community immunity fast enough? And can they maintain it fast enough?

Is it worth doing, this experiment? I can't say, I don't know.

What I feel is that it's kind of rococo. I guess really complex problems like this epidemic demand really complex solutions. There's no way to cut the Gaudian knot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 19, 2021, 12:43:09 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 19, 2021, 11:43:37 AM
The experiment, I think...

Yes, an experiment, and a very risky one. We have seen otherwhere (even in my own country Nov.-Dec. 2021) the effect of re-introducing restrictions too late. This is because the warning light often turns on too late, unless you do tons of reliable corona tests and frequent gen-sequencing as well as infection detection, all of which are very expensive. We have learned, that this is none-the-less necessary, and it is essential for our only partial re-opening.

It would be more rational to postpone larger re-openings until as many as possible had been vaccinated. And the degree of re-opening should be governed by the number of vaccinated individuals.

How long time the effect of the vaccines will last, nobody knows, but at the moment the estimate is at least one year. Probably boosters will become actual within foreseeable time. To rely even partially upon natural immunity would be stright suicidal, which is well-known by now..

The closing/ or opening of schools has in my country been shown to exert little effect upon the virus spread, so you may expect a growing epidemy when opening that much up, even if the schools are closed. Que has already posted about the most important risks of a growing epidemy (other than more morbidity and deaths), which are the emergence of more agressive mutants and the emergence of vaccine-resistant strains. This is the real reasons of the global health risk, but as I wrote above: Other parts of the world are more risky than GB in this respect.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on July 19, 2021, 01:53:43 PM
Gordian knot I guess.....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 19, 2021, 07:31:56 PM
Quote from: The new erato on July 19, 2021, 01:53:43 PM
Gordian knot I guess.....

Gaudian exists apparently, relating to Gaudi, the architect. But it makes me think of a gaudi, a sort of fund raising banquet for former members of Oxford colleges.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 19, 2021, 07:33:07 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 19, 2021, 12:43:09 PM

It would be more rational to postpone larger re-openings until as many as possible had been vaccinated. And the degree of re-opening should be governed by the number of vaccinated individuals.


Why?


Here's an interesting article on the issues surrounding vaccinating children

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1687/rr-8
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 19, 2021, 08:59:00 PM
On the other hand, an increasing number of studies seem to indicate long-term sickness effects among children who've then had the virus, lasting at least a year.

It's a difficult issue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 20, 2021, 03:40:29 AM
Heard this morning that, so far anyway, 71 people have tested positive for Covid at the Tokyo Olympics.  From what I understand, it's a combo of a handful of athletes and various contractors and workers there.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2021, 05:45:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 19, 2021, 07:33:07 PM
Why?

To minimize the risk  of uncontrolled virus spread.

The aim of vaccinating children is of course to add to herd immunity and thereby protect those, who don't experience equally mild Covid19 courses as children do.

I can well see the rationale for letting children get Covid19, but it should not happen experimentally at a time of an uncontrolled epidemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 20, 2021, 06:08:55 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/15/music-festival-in-holland-leads-to-over-1000-covid-infections.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 20, 2021, 06:34:53 AM
Mask mandates make a return — along with controversy (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07/19/mask-mandates-returning/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 20, 2021, 07:14:24 AM
Seems that the growth stopped here in DK, there's been a somewhat lower level for several days now.

Would be nice with a positive development, however locally. 46.3 % of the population is now fully vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2021, 08:19:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 20, 2021, 07:14:24 AM
Seems that the growth stopped here in DK, there's been a somewhat lower level for several days now.

Would be nice with a positive development, however locally. 46.3 % of the population is now fully vaccinated.

But fewer are being tested and the the positive percentage increases, so the situation is not entirely reassuring so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 20, 2021, 08:25:45 AM
The positive percentage plus the rise in positive tests seem to have stopped their growth for the last 4 days or so.

The R number was estimated to 1.1 today, having gone down from 1.3 last Tuesday, but that estimated R number is probably very imprecise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 08:26:15 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 20, 2021, 05:45:05 AM
To minimize the risk  of uncontrolled virus spread.

The aim of vaccinating children is of course to add to herd immunity and thereby protect those, who don't experience equally mild Covid19 courses as children do.

I can well see the rationale for letting children get Covid19, but it should not happen experimentally at a time of an uncontrolled epidemic.

I do not believe that the UK has enough vaccines to cover younger age cohorts. That's the reason they say that the choice is between opening now or opening in mid 2022. A later opening in 2021 seems to cause more stress on the health service, because of seasonal respiratory diseases.

I'm not saying this is a knock down argument for opening now, before adolescents are vaccinated, but I do want to say that the issues are complex.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 20, 2021, 08:32:27 AM
"Freedom day" is a lousy title and I squirm every time I hear it, but today does seem different and for good or ill, a blessed relief. Met a friend in a pub and for the first time since when allowed to order from the bar and I am far happier carrying the drinks myself then bar staff insisting on holding the glass and bringing it to my table. The village of the pub in question has a working men's club. I was told the club was jam-packed for the England semi-final Euro game. Subsequently fourteen were tested positive and forced to self-isolate, but none seriously ill. Covid is still out there alright.

The Pandora box of freedom has to be opened at some stage otherwise the world will go nuts. Is England too early? Probably.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2021, 09:26:26 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 08:26:15 AM
I do not believe that the UK has enough vaccines to cover younger age cohorts. That's the reason they say that the choice is between opening now or opening in mid 2022. A later opening in 2021 seems to cause more stress on the health service, because of seasonal respiratory diseases.

I don't quite understand, because whether you open up now or later this year, you will see the same number of cases of respiratory diseases in the winter. However if the well tried corona precautions are continued, you will not get that much seasonal upper respiratory tract disease, because even influenza seems to be less contagious than corona.

Would it seem impossible that the younger age cohorts might be vaccinated within the next four or five months?

Quote from: Mandryka
I'm not saying this is a knock down argument for opening now, before adolescents are vaccinated, but I do want to say that the issues are complex.

We can certainly agree that the problems are complex and that no one knows the best solution. My point, however, is that this not should be an occasion for risky experiments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 09:34:23 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 20, 2021, 09:26:26 AM
I don't quite understand, because whether you open up now or later this year, you will see the same number of cases of respiratory diseases in the winter. However if the well tried corona precautions are continued, you will not get that much seasonal upper respiratory tract disease, because even influenza seems to be less contagious than corona.

Would it seem impossible that the younger age cohorts might be vaccinated within the next four or five months?


If we open up now the peak of the exit wave is earlier than the start of the pressure from winter viruses. We expect a peak in August or early September, and then a long tail. By end August there should be substantial immunity in the community.

People here are expecting a tough year for flu, because of lost immunity last year.

I don't know how long it would take to vaccinate adolescents, and I don't know any details about the UK's vaccine stocks. Part of the problem is that we can't give the kids AZ.

If you want I'll give you a link to the modelling submissions which informed the uk decision, though I should say that they did not consider a 2022 opening.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 09:38:22 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 20, 2021, 09:26:26 AM


We can certainly agree that the problems are complex and that no one knows the best solution. My point, however, is that this not should be an occasion for risky experiments.

The risks being new variants, long covid in children and hospital admissions running out of control. The first two are hard to quantify, the last can be managed by reintroducing non pharmaceutical interventions.

There is another risk of course - vaccine waning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 20, 2021, 09:47:54 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 20, 2021, 08:32:27 AM
"Freedom day" is a lousy title and I squirm every time I hear it, but today does seem different and for good or ill, a blessed relief. Met a friend in a pub and for the first time since when allowed to order from the bar and I am far happier carrying the drinks myself then bar staff insisting on holding the glass and bringing it to my table. The village of the pub in question has a working men's club. I was told the club was jam-packed for the England semi-final Euro game. Subsequently fourteen were tested positive and forced to self-isolate, but none seriously ill. Covid is still out there alright.

The Pandora box of freedom has to be opened at some stage otherwise the world will go nuts. Is England too early? Probably.
Trust that you had a nice time with your friend?  How crowded was it in there and were any people wearing masks?  And was it a combo of indoor and outdoor tables for use?  Knock on wood, I hope that all goes well--or at least as well as possible.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2021, 09:53:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 09:34:23 AM
If we open up now the peak of the exit wave is earlier than the start of the pressure from winter viruses. We expect a peak in August or early September, and then a long tail. By end August there should be substantial immunity in the community.

To let the virus run its free course and rely upon acquired natural herd immunity is what Que called cynical above, because people at risk are surrendered to their own destiny. I would be one of those, if I lived in GB.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2021, 09:58:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 09:38:22 AM
The risks being new variants, long covid in children and hospital admissions running out of control. The first two are hard to quantify, the last can be managed by reintroducing non pharmaceutical interventions.

There is another risk of course - vaccine waning.

The best way to prevent new variants and vaccine waning - if it is possible at all - is to minimize the number of infected persons. And we do not do so by withdrawing the corona restrictions.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 09:58:58 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 20, 2021, 09:53:04 AM
To let the virus run its free course and rely upon acquired natural herd immunity is what Que called cynical above, because people at risk are surrendered to their own destiny. I would be one of those, if I lived in GB.

Yes I guess that in the Tory party's theory, the duty of care to its citizens has been discharged by offering vaccinations and hospital care if needed, and the existing laws covering health and safety at work. And of course there is a cost to restrictive interventions, which has to be balanced against the benefits.

I have no clear thoughts about the morality of the UK's position, not yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 20, 2021, 11:35:24 AM
The Uk's policy on vaccinating children has been revealed

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-jcvi-statement/jvci-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-15-july-2021
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 21, 2021, 03:38:40 AM
Quote from: Holden on July 15, 2021, 12:58:38 PM
Good luck with that - facts don't sell newspapers. Also, I'd remove the word 'health' and leave the phrase as simply misinformation.

I was simply quoting from the article. Probably should have put in quotes, but anyone who clicked on the link would have realized that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 21, 2021, 03:56:34 AM
The only viable response is to vaccinate everyone as quickly as possible, then relax restrictions. The fact that every manufacturer capable of making vaccine is not doing so at the fastest possible rate, and that in the U.S., where enough vaccine doses were purchased for the entire country, lots of vaccine are expiring without being used, indicates the utter failure of our culture and economy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 21, 2021, 04:37:19 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 21, 2021, 03:56:34 AM
The only viable response is to vaccinate everyone as quickly as possible, then relax restrictions. The fact that every manufacturer capable of making vaccine is not doing so at the fastest possible rate, and that in the U.S., where enough vaccine doses were purchased for the entire country, lots of vaccine are expiring without being used, indicates the utter failure of our culture and economy.

Not sure I would say utter failure, but we are definitely not handling the situation optimally given the availability of vaccine doses here. The single most damaging factor has been the politicization of a public health issue, but also plenty of people here have decided to forgo the jab for selfish reasons unrelated to politics. All of these factors contribute to the problem.

But I agree that restrictions should not be lifted until sufficient vaccine coverage for "herd immunity" has been reached. And we're not to that point even in my state, with the highest degree of vaccine coverage in the US. Yet, very few people in stores and other public settings wear masks. After "Freedom Day" it's pretty hard to ask people to take a step back.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 21, 2021, 06:24:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 20, 2021, 09:47:54 AM
Trust that you had a nice time with your friend?  How crowded was it in there and were any people wearing masks?  And was it a combo of indoor and outdoor tables for use?  Knock on wood, I hope that all goes well--or at least as well as possible.

PD

A visit to a Supermarket today - oh joy! Without exception everyone masked up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 21, 2021, 06:42:31 AM
"We have an influx of tourists, as well as people from the July Fourth weekend, which has put people in closer proximity with each other and these factors are contributing to the cases in several towns in Barnstable County," she said.

Reverberations from the Provincetown outbreak are already reaching Boston. The city's Public Health Commission reported at least 35 COVID-19 cases in Boston residents have been traced back to Provincetown and the "overwhelming majority of those have been fully vaccinated," officials said in a statement Tuesday.

Cape Cod is weathering a surge in COVID cases at the height of tourism season — including many among vaccinated people (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/20/metro/cape-cod-is-weathering-surge-covid-cases-height-tourism-season-including-many-among-vaccinated-people/?p1=HP_TrendingBar)


Well, I'm masking up again whenever I go grocery shopping.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 21, 2021, 07:13:35 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 21, 2021, 06:24:48 AM
A visit to a Supermarket today - oh joy! Without exception everyone masked up.
Oh, boy!  A big excursion for you!  :)  Had you been shopping a small local places instead?  Or having groceries delivered?  I know that your wife is good at canning, but still...

I've been shopping at supermarkets and local small grocery store, but often times tried not to go quite as often.  Mask restrictions have been lifted in I think pretty much everywhere in my state--though doctors' offices and hospitals still require them.  I still wear one when going into town as a precaution.  Haven't tried eating out yet though have done take out a few times.

PD

p.s.  Glad that the farmers markets are back too!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 06:38:03 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 21, 2021, 03:56:34 AM
The only viable response is to vaccinate everyone as quickly as possible, then relax restrictions. The fact that every manufacturer capable of making vaccine is not doing so at the fastest possible rate, and that in the U.S., where enough vaccine doses were purchased for the entire country, lots of vaccine are expiring without being used, indicates the utter failure of our culture and economy.

What's wrong with the UK's plan re vaccinating kids? I thought it was genius, given that the risk/benefit analysis of vaccinating children isn't clearly in the children's favour.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 06:41:15 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 21, 2021, 04:37:19 AM

But I agree that restrictions should not be lifted until sufficient vaccine coverage for "herd immunity" has been reached.

That's NEVER going to happen! The vaccines wane, the vaccines are not 100% effective, the variants are easily transmitted, there are ethical problems about vaccinating children.  You've got to find a way of living with it, because it's here to stay.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 22, 2021, 07:03:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 06:41:15 AM
That's NEVER going to happen! The vaccines wane, the vaccines are not 100% effective, the variants are easily transmitted, there are ethical problems about vaccinating children.  You've got to find a way of living with it, because it's here to stay.

Agreed. The cure is damaging the UK at present far more then Covid itself. The "pinging" NHS app is a perfect example of this which is creating chaos. Maybe I'm being ultra-pessimistic but ten days off on full pay if my smart phone pings........
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 22, 2021, 07:18:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 06:41:15 AM
That's NEVER going to happen! The vaccines wane, the vaccines are not 100% effective, the variants are easily transmitted, there are ethical problems about vaccinating children.  You've got to find a way of living with it, because it's here to stay.

The only way of living with it is to counterbalance the actual lack of herd immunity with the necessary restrictions. Otherwise you will soon face a pandemic completely out of control.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 22, 2021, 07:25:19 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 22, 2021, 07:03:37 AM
Agreed. The cure is damaging the UK at present far more then Covid itself. The "pinging" NHS app is a perfect example of this which is creating chaos. Maybe I'm being ultra-pessimistic but ten days off on full pay if my smart phone pings........
I heard this morning (over good ole NPR) about that "pinging" and the subsequent self-isolation for 10 days and that the pinging was on the rise.  By the way, how does that work regarding pay--particularly as far as small businesses are concerned?  Do you have to use up any sick leave and/or vacation time that you (one) have, or???  Who pays?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 09:02:49 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 22, 2021, 07:18:08 AM
The only way of living with it is to counterbalance the actual lack of herd immunity with the necessary restrictions. Otherwise you will soon face a pandemic completely out of control.

Can it not just bubble away with an R at about 1?  And of course those who really don't want to catch it will impose the necessary restrictions on themselves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 22, 2021, 11:13:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 09:02:49 AM
Can it not just bubble away with an R at about 1?

The latest estimate from our experts is that 86% of the population must be immune to the Delta variant, if one wants R to be below 1.

Quote from: Mandryka
And of course those who really don't want to catch it will impose the necessary restrictions on themselves.

If the virus is allowed to spread freely before a sufficient number of people are vaccinated, the people in the vulnerable group (some suffering from different diseases and others for whom the effect of vaccination for unknown reasons is insufficient - at least 10% of the population in all) will have to isolate themselves completely and even avoid contact with their closest relatives. So for them the necessary limitations are enormous.

And it is not that they just don't want to catch the virus, - it's a matter of life or death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 11:20:16 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 22, 2021, 11:13:52 AM
The latest estimate from our experts is that 86% of the population must be immune to the Delta variant, if one wants R to be below 1.


When you say immune to the delta variant, what do you mean? Fully vaccinated people seem to be less likely to transmit a dose, to develop symptoms, to develop serious symptoms, to die. All at different rates.

I'd be interested to see the model, if the paper is in a language I can understand.

Quote from: (: premont :) on July 22, 2021, 11:13:52 AM


If the virus is allowed to spread freely before a sufficient number of people are vaccinated, the people in the vulnerable group (some suffering from different diseases and others for whom the effect of vaccination for unknown reasons is insufficient - at least 10% of the population in all) will have to isolate themselves completely and even avoid contact with their closest relatives. So for them the necessary limitations are enormous.

And it is not that they just don't want to catch the virus, - it's a matter of life or death.

I don't have an answer to this set of serious problems, especially given my interrogations about what a "sufficient number of people are vaccinated" is and about the ethics of vaccinating children. 

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 22, 2021, 11:47:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 11:20:16 AM
When you say immune to the delta variant, what do you mean. Fully vaccinated people seem to be less likely to transmit a dose, to develop symptoms, to develop serious symptoms, to die. All at different rates.

I'd be interested to see the model, if the paper is in a language I can understand.

I don't have an answer to this set of serious problems, especially given my interrogations about what a "sufficient number of people are vaccinated" is and about the ethics of vaccinating children.

Immunity means that one neither catches the virus nor transmits it actively. Anyway because a number of the vaccinated people still catches and maybe transmits the virus, the number of vaccinated people must be higher than the degree of immunity one wants to obtain. I have not seen the details of the calculations are published, maybe Music Turner knows.

Concerning vaccination of children: Vaccination against Rubella is offered to boys also, even if they as well as never get problems themselves when contracting the disease. They are vaccinated to prevent that they, if they contract the disease, transmit it to a susceptible person in this case a pregnant woman - high risk of serious foetus problems with this disease. So here is a parallel to the corona issue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 12:03:55 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 22, 2021, 11:47:56 AM

Concerning vaccination of children: Vaccination against Rubella is offered to boys also, even if they as well as never get problems themselves when contracting the disease. They are vaccinated to prevent that they, if they contract the disease, transmit it to a susceptible person in this case a pregnant woman - high risk of serious foetus problems with this disease. So here is a parallel to the corona issue.

I didn't know that, and I don't know whether the risk of a serious side effect from the rubella vaccine is greater than for the covid vaccines, in children. Anyway the UK strategy of vaccinating just children at higher risk from COVID and those living with particularly vulnerable adults seems to me an ingenious compromise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 22, 2021, 12:29:24 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 12:03:55 PM
I didn't know that, and I don't know whether the risk of a serious side effect from the rubella vaccine is greater than for the covid vaccines, in children. Anyway the UK strategy of vaccinating just children at higher risk from COVID and those living with particularly vulnerable adults seems to me an ingenious compromise.

We haven't here had any serious side effects neither from Rubella vaccine nor from the RNA vaccines.

To me the important point is that corona vaccination of children is optional. Yes, I know,  in the end it's up to the parents to decide, but so is it even as to Rubella vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on July 22, 2021, 01:11:30 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 22, 2021, 12:29:24 PM
We haven't here had any serious side effects neither from Rubella vaccine nor from the RNA vaccines.

To me the important point is that corona vaccination of children is optional. Yes, I know,  in the end it's up to the parents to decide, but so is it even as to Rubella vaccine.

I am unsure how it works in other spots of the globe, but in the United States, students are required to have Polio, Diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, rubella, measles, mumps, Chickenpox, and in some areas, Hepatitis B vaccines before entering public school. Where I live, there are religious exemptions for these vaccines, particularly from the Amish and Mennonites, but they tend to school their own children.

Now, some US universities are requiring Covid-19 vaccines to gain entrance. However, with the political nexus surrounding the vaccine, I don't see a nationwide mandate in our future for school-aged children. When they become available for youths, that is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 22, 2021, 04:14:07 PM
Quote from: Que on July 17, 2021, 02:34:16 AM

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w27_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=YSY1HjWv)

So, there we go. The Netherlands have turned deep red... Our southern brethren in Belgium turned orange. Luxemburg red as well.

And all the holiday destinations are warming up infection wise. With the French Côte d 'Azur, Croatia (Dalmatian Coast) and Greece joining in with Portugal, Spain, Malta and Cyprus. Somehow Italy is still managing to keep infections low.

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/situation-updates/weekly-maps-coordinated-restriction-free-movement


Further spreading of the Delta variant:

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w28_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=3-TASo7s)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 23, 2021, 04:27:40 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 11:20:16 AM
When you say immune to the delta variant, what do you mean? Fully vaccinated people seem to be less likely to transmit a dose, to develop symptoms, to develop serious symptoms, to die. All at different rates.

I read the article a bit too fast. The estimate is that 86% of the population need to be fully vaccinated before we are near having herd immunity. And this is still many. However the expert thinks, that this will be achieved here in 2 - 3 months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 23, 2021, 04:30:42 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 04:27:40 AM
I read the article a bit too fast. The estimate is that 86% of the population need to be fully vaccinated before we are near having herd immunity. And this is still many. However the expert thinks, that this will be achieved here in 2 - 3 months.

Indications are that we might reach that mark in the Netherlands, as the number of vaccine "hesitants" is steadily declining.
We might end up in the upper 80s or just over the 90% mark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 05:56:36 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 04:27:40 AM
I read the article a bit too fast. The estimate is that 86% of the population need to be fully vaccinated before we are near having herd immunity. And this is still many. However the expert thinks, that this will be achieved here in 2 - 3 months.

(https://i.ibb.co/6FqLfBR/Capture.jpg)

We are pretty well there, and all set to exceed it very soon. So if you want to know what the effect of 86% vaccinated is, you'll see it in the UK.

I've never studied epidemiology. My impression is that as a place approaches herd immunity the growth should slow down. All herd immunity means is that the reproduction rate is less than 1 without non-pharmaceutical interventions. When that happens, there will be a long slow decline in numbers.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 23, 2021, 05:56:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 22, 2021, 06:41:15 AM
That's NEVER going to happen! The vaccines wane, the vaccines are not 100% effective, the variants are easily transmitted, there are ethical problems about vaccinating children.  You've got to find a way of living with it, because it's here to stay.

I agree (mostly). But that doesn't mean we should lift all restrictions. In areas where herd immunity has already been reached (as is likely in my state), sure. Everywhere else, people should at the very least still be masking up.

As to vaccines waning: sure, boosters will be needed. But once herd immunity is reached, it can (hopefully) be maintained. The fact that vaccines are not 100% effective is not a barrier to herd immunity - they don't HAVE to be 100% effective.

Ethical problems with vaccinating children? I don't see any, and likely that will happen in most countries fairly soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 23, 2021, 07:46:24 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 04:27:40 AM
I read the article a bit too fast. The estimate is that 86% of the population need to be fully vaccinated before we are near having herd immunity. And this is still many. However the expert thinks, that this will be achieved here in 2 - 3 months.

Quote from: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 05:56:36 AM
We are pretty well there, and all set to exceed it very soon. So if you want to know what the effect of 86% vaccinated is, you'll see it in the UK.

Possibly. Apart from the transmissibility of the (variant) of the virus, the threshold for group immunity depends on the effectiveness of the vaccine(s) that were used. The effectiveness of the different vacciness against the Delta variant varies, and different countries have used different vaccines. So the threshold for group immunity will vary as well from country to country. The less effective the vaccines used, the higher the threshold for group immunity.

The UK predominantly used a less effective vaccine - AstraZeneca. This why in the UK a "booster" with Pfizer (or Moderna) is being discussed to increase the effectiveness of vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 23, 2021, 08:42:18 AM
Quote from: Que on July 23, 2021, 07:46:24 AM
Possibly. Apart from the transmissibility of the (variant) of the virus, the threshold for group immunity depends on the effectiveness of the vaccine(s) that were used. The effectiveness of the different vacciness against the Delta variant varies, and different countries have used different vaccines. So the threshold for group immunity will vary as well from country to country. The less effective the vaccines used, the higher the threshold for group immunity.

The UK predominantly used a less effective vaccine - AstraZeneca. This why in the UK a "booster" with Pfizer (or Moderna) is being discussed to increase the effectiveness of vaccination.

Yes, that's some important points. The estimate from the Danish expert includes the Delta variant and the fact, that almost all Danes have got the Pfizer vaccine or the Moderna vaccine. Only about 200.000 (about 3%) have got the Astra-Zeneca vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 23, 2021, 08:54:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 05:56:36 AM

I've never studied epidemiology. My impression is that as a place approaches herd immunity the growth should slow down. All herd immunity means is that the reproduction rate is less than 1 without non-pharmaceutical interventions. When that happens, there will be a long slow decline in numbers.

Yes, herd immunity in usual speaking means the degree of immunity which causes the R to fall below 1, so that the epidemic diminishes and eventually (hopefully) dies out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 09:00:54 AM
Quote from: Que on July 23, 2021, 07:46:24 AM


The UK predominantly used a less effective vaccine - AstraZeneca. This why in the UK a "booster" with Pfizer (or Moderna) is being discussed to increase the effectiveness of vaccination.

Less effective at what? I mean, what type of effectiveness counts for the sort of community level immunity we're seeking? If it's about reducing transmission and hospitalisation, then, well  . . . look at the AZ data again maybe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 09:06:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 08:54:02 AM
Yes, herd immunity in usual speaking means the degree of immunity which causes the R to fall below 1, so that the epidemic diminishes and eventually (hopefully) dies out.

Well as I said here in a discussion a couple of weeks ago, I don't think that this is something vaccination can achieve. That's to say the vaccines cut transmission by X% and the R0 of delta is Y and 1- X% of Y is still greater than 1. I think the relevant numbers were X=75% and Y = 5 or 6.  I don't have a solution to the problems this brings with it -- except that the vaccines make the diseases mostly less severe -- but as you know, not for everyone, there are breakthroughs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 23, 2021, 09:13:26 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 08:42:18 AM
Yes, that's some important points. The estimate from the Danish expert includes the Delta variant and the fact, that almost all Danes have got the Pfizer vaccine or the Moderna vaccine. Only about 200.000 (about 3%) have got the Astra-Zeneca vaccine.

I think it's even less, less than 160,000, and only 1500 of them got the second shot of A-Z; 190 took the vaccine by their own choice, when that option came recently, to jump the queues for Pfizer and Moderna.
https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2021/status-paa-behandlede-indberetninger-om-formodede-bivirkninger-ved-vaxzevria-astrazeneca,-uge-27/

It's somehow interesting how the Delta variant, in spite of now consisting of 90% of infections here, hasn't meant a really continuous rise in the relatively modest infection levels in Denmark, compared to say UK. They've been stable for some time now, certainly at least a week. Neither in hospitalizations. New infections are mainly concentrated among unvaccinated people in their 20s. The current local restrictions are few. We'll reach 50% fully vaccinated tomorrow, and 70% with the first shot only.

Of course, people returning from their holidays, especially abroad say in Spain etc., may cause a rise here again.

Also, a big, local study found that only a minute number of vaccinated here got the virus afterwards.

They'll try to repeat the studies in August, to see if there's any change, including because of more Delta cases.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 23, 2021, 10:14:19 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 23, 2021, 09:13:26 AM
I think it's even less, less than 160.000, and only 1500 of them got the second shot of A-Z; 190 took the vaccine by their own choice, when that option came recently, to jump the queues for Pfizer and Moderna.

Well, I was too lazy to look the precise number up, since I considered it less important.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 23, 2021, 10:43:01 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 23, 2021, 10:14:19 AM
Well, I was too lazy to look the precise number up, since I considered it less important.

Agree, they're not terribly important, but I felt surprised by those initial figures, and had to check ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 23, 2021, 11:12:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 09:06:55 AM
Well as I said here in a discussion a couple of weeks ago, I don't think that this is something vaccination can achieve. That's to say the vaccines cut transmission by X% and the R0 of delta is Y and 1- X% of Y is still greater than 1. I think the relevant numbers were X=75% and Y = 5 or 6.  I don't have a solution to the problems this brings with it -- except that the vaccines make the diseases mostly less severe -- but as you know, not for everyone, there are breakthroughs.

In Israel they have found that the Pfizer vaccine reduces clinical morbidity and mortality from the Delta variant with more than 90%, whereas the reduction of infections (the subclinical and asymtomatic included) is only 64%. If this is true and the "natural" R (without restrictions) is 6 for the Delta variant, we may reach an R = 2 but only if the entire population is vaccinated. So perhaps the virus can't be extinguished without some long-term restrictions.

Source (in Danish). Google translate will do the job.

https://medwatch.dk/samfund/article13111217.ece
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 24, 2021, 12:25:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 23, 2021, 09:00:54 AM
Less effective at what? I mean, what type of effectiveness counts for the sort of community level immunity we're seeking? If it's about reducing transmission and hospitalisation, then, well  . . . look at the AZ data again maybe.

British authorities keep hammering on the fact that AZ is (still) highly effective in preventing hospitalisation. And all indications are that it is effective in that way. And although that is very relevant for those who received the vaccine, provided they are fully vaccinated, it is an irrelevant factor in stopping the virus from spreading. What is relevant is whether someone is still being able to get infected in a way that the virus spreads and multiplies in the body and can be passed on to the next host.

Here in the Netherlands there have been several cases of reinfections of vaccinated, particularly in the case of the single-shot Janssen vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 01:25:14 AM
Quote from: Que on July 24, 2021, 12:25:25 AM
British authorities keep hammering on the fact that AZ is (still) highly effective in preventing hospitalisation. And all indications are that it is effective in that way. And although that is very relevant for those who received the vaccine, provided they are fully vaccinated, it is an irrelevant factor in stopping the virus from spreading. What is relevant is whether someone is still being able to get infected in a way that the virus spreads and multiplies in the body and can be passed on to the next host.

Here in the Netherlands there have been several cases of reinfections of vaccinated, particularly in the case of the single-shot Janssen vaccine.

Is it the case that the other vaccines are more effective at stopping spread? If so, that's very interesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 24, 2021, 01:32:28 AM
Survey results vary between studies, but Pfizer is slightly more efficient against Delta than A-Z, at least until now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 01:33:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 24, 2021, 01:32:28 AM
Survey results vary between studies, but Pfizer is slightly more efficient than A-Z, at least until now.

At reducing transmission? Can you provide a link?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 24, 2021, 01:38:24 AM
Here's one list of surveys, but the exact content, including the question of transmission, requires more reading (and, apparently, studies). Note the different results too.

https://www.businessinsider.com/delta-variant-covid-vaccine-effectiveness-protection-pfizer-moderna-astrazeneca-2021-7?r=US&IR=T
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 24, 2021, 01:45:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 01:33:48 AM
At reducing transmission? Can you provide a link?

From the Dutch "CDC":

Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty) and Moderna vaccines
These vaccines are more than 90% effective in preventing disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This means that in a group of vaccinated people, there will be 90% fewer people who get COVID-19 symptoms than in a group (of the same size) of unvaccinated people. The studies show that people who did contract COVID-19 even after vaccination became less seriously ill.

AstraZeneca vaccine
The vaccine is 60-80% effective in preventing disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This means that in a group of vaccinated people, there will be 60-80% fewer people who get COVID-19 symptoms than in a group (of the same size) of unvaccinated people. The vaccine is especially effective in protecting against serious illness. Hospital admissions among vaccinated people are 90% lower than among unvaccinated people.

Janssen vaccine
The vaccine is 66% effective in preventing disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This means that in a group of vaccinated people, there will be 66% fewer people who get COVID-19 symptoms than in a group (of the same size) of unvaccinated people. The vaccine also protects 85% of vaccinated people against serious illness from the coronavirus.


After you are vaccinated, you can still become infected with the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The vaccination protects against illness caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.  Several studies have been published showing that vaccination also reduces the transmission of the virus from one person to another. The studies were limited in number and much of the evidence is indirect, but the results consistently point in the same direction: vaccination helps prevent infected people from infecting others.

https://www.rivm.nl/en/covid-19-vaccination/vaccines/efficacy-and-protection
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 02:07:13 AM
I conclude that there is no evidence to suggest that AZ is less effective than Pfizer or whatever at reducing transmission or hospitalisation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 24, 2021, 02:55:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 02:07:13 AM
I conclude that there is no evidence to suggest that AZ is less effective than Pfizer or whatever at reducing transmission or hospitalisation.

Oh, but there is "evidence", even though it is not definite and conclusive. At some point in time, when everything is extensively researched and analysed, done and dusted, there will be conclusive evidence on this issue (transmission, not hospitalisation)

If the norm of "conclusive" evidence had been applied in this pandemic, none of the vaccines would have been used as soon as they were. To me the assumption that if a vaccine is less effective in the sense that someone develeops symptoms because the virus is able to multiply in the body it also increases the chance that the virus is transmitted, seems entirely logical. And if there is research that indicates that this is indeed the case, that is good enough in this situation to base policy decisions on.

Why is the UK looking into the possibility of "boosting" the effectiveness of AZ with an additional shot of Pfizer?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 24, 2021, 03:03:45 AM
1) So far, there's just one study that a lot of sources quote about the effect regarding hospitalization. AZ seems to be around 90-92% preventive, Pfizer around 96-98% preventive.

"The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is 96% effective against hospitalisation after 2 doses
the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is 92% effective against hospitalisation after 2 doses
"

That's just one of many sources quoting that survey:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/vaccines-highly-effective-against-hospitalisation-from-delta-variant

One of the problems is of course that there can be differences in age and health between the compared, vaccinated groups.

2) Another study didn't have enough results yet for a final comparison of second shots, but said:
"AstraZeneca's Vaxzevria vaccine was 82% effective in preventing hospitalization or death from the Beta and Gamma SARS-CoV-2 virus variants. Using the same benchmark, its efficacy against the Alpha and Delta variants was 87% and 90%, respectively, 21 days after administering the first dose (...)

The BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer and BioNTech had a similar efficacy after 21 days. In terms of protecting against the Beta and Gamma variants, a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was 83% effective at protecting against hospitalization and death after 21 days. One dose of Moderna's mRNA-1273 vaccine was 94% effective at the same interval.
A second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine boosted its efficacy considerably. It was 98% effective at preventing hospitalization or death from the Beta and Gamma variants 14 days after the second dose. Its protection against other variants was similar following the second dose." (...)

There was, however, insufficient data to assess the post-second-dose efficacy of the AstraZeneca or Moderna vaccines (...)
https://www.drugdiscoverytrends.com/astrazeneca-pfizer-moderna-vaccines-fare-well-against-beta-gamma-and-delta-variants-in-study/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 03:17:20 AM
Quote from: Que on July 24, 2021, 02:55:19 AM


Why is the UK looking into the possibility of "boosting" the effectiveness of AZ with an additional shot of Pfizer?

I am sure I once read that there's some evidence that a cocktail produces better results -- something to do with t cells.

My point really in all this discussion was just this: if you want to see what 85% vaccination looks like, just watch the UK. We'll be there pretty soon. My feeling is that it's nothing like herd immunity, and whether it's a major step forward depends on how the population behaves. That's what the UK experiment is really -- to see how the population behaves without restrictions but with lots of public messages urging caution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 25, 2021, 02:05:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 24, 2021, 03:17:20 AM
I am sure I once read that there's some evidence that a cocktail produces better results -- something to do with t cells.

My point really in all this discussion was just this: if you want to see what 85% vaccination looks like, just watch the UK. We'll be there pretty soon. My feeling is that it's nothing like herd immunity, and whether it's a major step forward depends on how the population behaves. That's what the UK experiment is really -- to see how the population behaves without restrictions but with lots of public messages urging caution.

Don't know about you but I am sick to the high teeth with Johnson/Whitty/Vallance briefings. Within reason let the British public get on with it! Most remain cautious for their own protection. There is a sense of freedom only because good advice is being followed, masks are still being worn and ineffective Covid inspired laws are ignored.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 25, 2021, 04:13:21 AM
Sure, we are all "sick" of it.... But the virus doesn't seem very interested in how we feel about it:

Covid: Delta variant spreads globally as cases soar (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-57907681) (BBC)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 25, 2021, 04:48:38 AM
Quote from: Irons on July 25, 2021, 02:05:34 AM
Don't know about you but I am sick to the high teeth with Johnson/Whitty/Vallance briefings. Within reason let the British public get on with it! Most remain cautious for their own protection. There is a sense of freedom only because good advice is being followed, masks are still being worn and ineffective Covid inspired laws are ignored.

People aren't free independent rational agents like Descartes said. Their choices are governed by material demands and social pressures. They have to put bread on the table, the media is saying they're losers unless they earn big money, their employers encourage them to take risks for profit, ministers say that we mustn't be cowering cowards. And all the time it is becoming harder and harder to avoid catching covid.

My feeling is that covid is all over apart from details. Everyone is pushing for things to return to essentially how they were before. The COVID crisis will not lead to any sort of metamorphosis of society. The forces of parliamentary capitalism are stronger than the force of the epidemic. It's looking more and more like COVID is pretty minor in the grand scheme of history.

Oh and let me share some good news which may be relevant to all this. Flu and pneumonia deaths have been very significantly higher than covid deaths since at least March, and were 10 times higher in June, according to the ONS.

And age standardised mortality for the whole of 2021 is broadly the same as many recent years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 25, 2021, 06:56:06 AM
Summer music festivals have returned — just in time for the latest coronavirus surge (https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/07/24/music-festivals-covid/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on July 25, 2021, 09:12:12 AM
Quote from: Que on July 25, 2021, 04:13:21 AM
Sure, we are all "sick" of it.... But the virus doesn't seem very interested in how we feel about it:

Covid: Delta variant spreads globally as cases soar (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-57907681) (BBC)

Light at end of tunnel?  https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/covid-infections-halve-in-a-week-b0lvjjtl2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 25, 2021, 01:38:23 PM
Quote from: Irons on July 25, 2021, 09:12:12 AM
Light at end of tunnel?  https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/covid-infections-halve-in-a-week-b0lvjjtl2

Infections down from the recent peak in the UK is certainly good news. There is a similar development in the Netherlands, after infections peaked following the premature lifting of restrictions - which were partly reinstated. But infections are  still going up again in several other European countries.

I expect that at the end of the summer we will have the situation reasonably under control in our European bubble. For how long, is anyone's guess. Perhaps our vaccine producers and health care systems will be able to keep up with the future new variants?

The US is struggling to convince a (too) large part of its population to get vaccinated:
Covid: Fauci says US heading in wrong direction as cases rise (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57962387)

In most of the rest of the world the fight against the pandemic is not going well:
Covid-19: India excess deaths cross four million, says study (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-57888460)


This morning I received my 2nd Pfizer shot. After getting the injection, I went to the desk to get my registration papers in order.
I said to the volunteers of the Dutch Red Cross behind the desk, with some relief: "Well, my 2nd shot,  I'm done!"

You know what the reply was? ::)  "Yes, indeed.....for now...."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 25, 2021, 04:44:08 PM
Coronavirus cases have skyrocketed in Finland since mid June due to delta variant which spreads a lot among 20-30 year olds.
Thanks to older people and risk groups being so well vaccinated hospitalizations/corona deaths have stayed pretty low.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 25, 2021, 07:13:29 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 25, 2021, 04:44:08 PM
Coronavirus cases have skyrocketed in Finland since mid June due to delta variant which spreads a lot among 20-30 year olds.
Thanks to older people and risk groups being so well vaccinated hospitalizations/corona deaths have stayed pretty low.


Stay safe, Poju!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 25, 2021, 07:33:17 PM
The lack of mask wearing even for those who are vaccinated is mind-boggling. Everyone where I live and from what I've seen on the news is acting as if this virus has just magically disappeared. I haven't been vaccinated, the clinic I prefer to get the two doses of Pfizer isn't getting any back in until September, so I'll just wait it out. My own hesitance about getting the vaccine seems to have diminished now. I recognize that my inaction could be seen as 'reckless' to those who are vaccinated, but I needed more information before I made this kind of decision. Respect this or not, this was my choice. I'm not like a lot of people I know, I wear a mask religiously and I wash my hands as often as possible, especially after being around different kinds of people. Interestingly enough, I was originally going to get the Johnson & Johnson shot back in January, but I had a bad feeling about it and, in hindsight, I'm glad I didn't get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 25, 2021, 07:49:27 PM
Quote from: Irons on July 25, 2021, 09:12:12 AM
Light at end of tunnel?

Too soon to say. But it would be against all expectations!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: (poco) Sforzando on July 25, 2021, 07:56:27 PM
After over a year of not travelling into New York City (from my home 50 miles east), I went in twice this past week - once to see the Julie Mehretu show at the Whitney (worth it), and once to see the Alice Neel show at the Met (not). I used the commuter railroad into Penn Station, but the bus rather than the subways to get around Manhattan. I was shocked and dismayed at how few people were wearing masks, except in the museums themselves where face coverings are required. I still wear a mask in public almost all the time. It's a wise precaution since you have no idea who you're encountering has had the shots. This thing is not over yet, not by a long shot (bad pun), and though I'm vaccinated I have several risk factors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 25, 2021, 08:34:33 PM
Quote from: (poco) Sforzando on July 25, 2021, 07:56:27 PM
After over a year of not travelling into New York City (from my home 50 miles east), I went in twice this past week - once to see the Julie Mehretu show at the Whitney (worth it), and once to see the Alice Neel show at the Met (not). I used the commuter railroad into Penn Station, but the bus rather than the subways to get around Manhattan. I was shocked and dismayed at how few people were wearing masks, except in the museums themselves where face coverings are required. I still wear a mask in public almost all the time. It's a wise precaution since you have no idea who you're encountering has had the shots. This thing is not over yet, not by a long shot (bad pun), and though I'm vaccinated I have several risk factors.

It is our civil duty to still wear masks. Like you said, it's not over yet and the way people are acting is incredibly selfish and these "people" (if you want to call them this at this juncture in time) are dangerous. I know it doesn't look 'cool' to wear a mask --- I totally get that, but, right now, making a fashion statement should be off the table. Some people aren't wearing a mask, because they don't like being told what they can/can't do and, honestly, these people are morons. I've been wearing a mask in public since March of last year. It isn't difficult to put the thing on. The key is actually putting it on in the first place. This has only reinforced my opinion about the US general public: it's full of narcissistic, cellphone-toting, brain-dead, ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, moral-less neanderthals who would rather post another selfie than to keep themselves from sneezing or coughing on the 78 yr old lady in the checkout line in the grocery store. It makes me fucking sick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 25, 2021, 10:29:01 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 25, 2021, 07:33:17 PM
The lack of mask wearing even for those who are vaccinated is mind-boggling. Everyone where I live and from what I've seen on the news is acting as if this virus has just magically disappeared. I haven't been vaccinated, the clinic I prefer to get the two doses of Pfizer isn't getting any back in until September, so I'll just wait it out. My own hesitance about getting the vaccine seems to have diminished now. I recognize that my inaction could be seen as 'reckless' to those who are vaccinated, but I needed more information before I made this kind of decision. Respect this or not, this was my choice. I'm not like a lot of people I know, I wear a mask religiously and I wash my hands as often as possible, especially after being around different kinds of people. Interestingly enough, I was originally going to get the Johnson & Johnson shot back in January, but I had a bad feeling about it and, in hindsight, I'm glad I didn't get it.

What's so magical about this clinic you prefer? Just go on the CVS web site and they will direct you to the nearest CVS location with appointments available. A mask reduces your risk by 50%. A vaccine reduces your risk by 95%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 25, 2021, 11:48:46 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 25, 2021, 10:29:01 PM
A mask reduces your risk by 50%.

Blimey! What sort of mask?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 25, 2021, 11:51:59 PM
Consider this:


So this is where the current UK approach makes a lot of sense to me. If you have been fully vaccinated and get Covid your body's ability to develop antibodies is quite strong so getting covid is going to further strengthen your immune system.

There are many new daily cases in the UK but what the public is not being told is the severity of any of these cases. The media are still using case numbers as their baseline instead of hospitalisation and death. On top of that I would want to know what percentage of the people with serious covid are unvaccinated.

The current outbreak in Sydney supposedly took the life of a 33 year old woman. Within hours of her unfortunate demise the media were saying that she had no comorbidities, indicating that the Delta (I still prefer Indian) variant will take the lives of young people. This is debatable and fear mongering by the media. Surely, the only way to accurately determine that she had no underlying issues is via autopsy and this would not have been done that quickly. This is also poor media coverage and possibly a rash or misquoted statement from someone in the NSW Dept of Health. Get the facts right before you publish them - oh, I forgot, facts don't sell newspapers or generate advertising revenue.

I get my second dose of Astrazeneca on August 14, twelve weeks after my initial shot. The twelve weeks in between both jabs takes Astrazeneca up to an effectiveness rate close to Pfizer and that will do me. I realise that I can still get Covid but the vaccine is highly likely to minimise the effects. I feel safe. As for mask wearing, that's another debate that I won't get in to.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 26, 2021, 12:11:58 AM
Hospitalizations in UK are not being that hidden. It's extremely easy to google results, it's close to 1000 daily these days.

But a headline in a Danish newspaper the other day mysteriously said that 1/4 of hospitalized in the UK were vaccinated, at least to some degree. I didn't do further research on it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 26, 2021, 12:19:11 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 26, 2021, 12:11:58 AM
Hospitalizations in UK are not being that hidden. It's extremely easy to google results.

But a headline in a Danish newspaper the other day mysteriously said that 1/4 of hospitalized in the UK were vaccinated, at least to some degree.

You would expect a large number of hospitalisations to be vaccinated, since the great majority of people who get seriously ill are vaccinated! I'm surprised it's only 1/4.  When you have fully vaccinated the whole population, all the hospitalised people will be vaccinated - obvs!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 26, 2021, 12:21:21 AM
Quote from: Holden on July 25, 2021, 11:51:59 PM

On top of that I would want to know what percentage of the people with serious covid are unvaccinated.


I don't believe this information is available, it wasn't a couple of months ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 26, 2021, 01:11:26 AM
Vaccines generally soften symptoms. In Denmark, about 10% of those who got the sickness in spite of one or two vaccines were hospitalized. This in relation to the first half of 2021, and including a lot of the vulnerable senior groups. I'm pretty sure non-vaccinated constitute the bigger part of hospitalizations. Of course, when the proportion of vaccinated go up, the share will be bigger. The UK is no longer much ahead as regards vaccines, percentages are almost the same in some other countries, including DK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 03:25:01 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 25, 2021, 07:33:17 PM
The lack of mask wearing even for those who are vaccinated is mind-boggling. Everyone where I live and from what I've seen on the news is acting as if this virus has just magically disappeared. I haven't been vaccinated, the clinic I prefer to get the two doses of Pfizer isn't getting any back in until September, so I'll just wait it out. My own hesitance about getting the vaccine seems to have diminished now. I recognize that my inaction could be seen as 'reckless' to those who are vaccinated, but I needed more information before I made this kind of decision. Respect this or not, this was my choice. I'm not like a lot of people I know, I wear a mask religiously and I wash my hands as often as possible, especially after being around different kinds of people. Interestingly enough, I was originally going to get the Johnson & Johnson shot back in January, but I had a bad feeling about it and, in hindsight, I'm glad I didn't get it.
Like you, I had hoped to get my shots at a preferred location (senior center in my town), but instead ended up getting it at a big box store with pharmacy just because they had an opening and I was tired of waiting.  The pharmacist was a very nice, professional, young woman who was very thorough in telling me about common reactions, where to get more info, answered any questions I had, etc.  They had several waiting chairs in the area which were carefully spaced apart and were wiped down between patients.  And also good about telling you how long you needed to wait there afterwards to make sure that you were o.k. to leave.  And they also scheduled your follow up appointment that day, etc.

I ended up receiving the Moderna vaccine and other than a sore arm for about a day and a half, felt fine.  Is there any particular reason why you want to only get the Pfizer John?

In any event, good for you for masking up and washing your hands.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 26, 2021, 05:25:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 03:25:01 AM
Like you, I had hoped to get my shots at a preferred location (senior center in my town), but instead ended up getting it at a big box store with pharmacy just because they had an opening and I was tired of waiting.  The pharmacist was a very nice, professional, young woman who was very thorough in telling me about common reactions, where to get more info, answered any questions I had, etc.  They had several waiting chairs in the area which were carefully spaced apart and were wiped down between patients.  And also good about telling you how long you needed to wait there afterwards to make sure that you were o.k. to leave.  And they also scheduled your follow up appointment that day, etc.

In my area I first signed up with the big public hospital for vaccination. I was notified that my turn came up to book an appointment, but I found out I would have to go to downtown Houston to get the vaccine. That sounded unattractive, since downtown Houston was a Covid-19 hotspot. "I'll get Covid waiting my turn for the shot," I thought. So I started checking the CVS website, and it took two weeks of daily visits, but I finally got an appointment. Had to drive half an hour to a neighboring town, but the experience was very smooth. Moderna vaccine. Side effect was a sore arm, and feeling a little fatigued the following day.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 26, 2021, 05:26:22 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 26, 2021, 05:25:26 AM
In my area I first signed up with the big public hospital for vaccination. I was notified that my turn came up to book an appointment, but I found out I would have to go to downtown Houston to get the vaccine. That sounded unattractive, since downtown Houston was a Covid-19 hotspot. "I'll get Covid waiting my turn for the shot," I thought. So I started checking the CVS website, and it took two weeks of daily visits, but I finally got an appointment. Had to drive half an hour to a neighboring town, but the experience was very smooth. Moderna vaccine. Side effect was a sore arm, and feeling a little fatigued the following day.



Well done.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 05:51:55 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 26, 2021, 05:25:26 AM
In my area I first signed up with the big public hospital for vaccination. I was notified that my turn came up to book an appointment, but I found out I would have to go to downtown Houston to get the vaccine. That sounded unattractive, since downtown Houston was a Covid-19 hotspot. "I'll get Covid waiting my turn for the shot," I thought. So I started checking the CVS website, and it took two weeks of daily visits, but I finally got an appointment. Had to drive half an hour to a neighboring town, but the experience was very smooth. Moderna vaccine. Side effect was a sore arm, and feeling a little fatigued the following day.
I could certainly see you wanting to avoid hotspots.  And like you, I had to keep checking for openings, calling and visiting certain websites, but this was some time ago (first shot in mid-April).  These days, from everything that I've been reading anyway, it's so much easier to get a shot.  In my state, there are portable (bus) vaccination vehicles for example.  I'm guessing though, that this could vary in the US--particularly in very rural areas and, sadly, it's harder on low-income people, folks without transport or other mobility issues, etc.  I think that in some places, though there are organizations that offer free transportation to a vaccine site?  Believe that one can also get it at ones doctor's office too.

A p.s. to John (Mirror Image) to think about:  Last I knew, you were living with elderly parents?  Thinking about their health as well as your own, perhaps it would be in everyones best interest for you to get your first jab--of something--rather than waiting?  With *Moderna, there was something like a 28 day wait between shots and then it still takes about another two weeks after that for you to be considered fully vaccinated.  In this scenario, say if you received your first shot on September 1, you wouldn't be able to get your second until almost the end of September and then you wouldn't be fully vaccinated for about 10 days to 2 weeks afterward which means roughly mid-October.  Just something to think about.  And, you're right, it's your choice.  You might also consider talking to your health care provider if you have any concerns?  :)
*not certain what the wait-time between shots is with Pfizer.  You could also check to see if you could get the Pfizer elsewhere too?  Just some thoughts.  Want you to be around to chat with about Martinu, Janacek and other Czech composers!  ;D
Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 26, 2021, 07:40:23 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 25, 2021, 07:13:29 PM
Stay safe, Poju!

Thanks for your concern Karl.  0:)

As I am a very introverted person who spends most of the time alone while social circuits are very small, I have been pretty "safe" during this pandemic. Next Saturday I will be getting my 2nd Pfizer jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 07:46:33 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 25, 2021, 10:29:01 PM
What's so magical about this clinic you prefer? Just go on the CVS web site and they will direct you to the nearest CVS location with appointments available. A mask reduces your risk by 50%. A vaccine reduces your risk by 95%.

Well, I just prefer to go to my doctor to get it. I'm not comfortable with the idea of going to a pharmacy to have it done. My point about masks is that everybody should wear them and they should be mandated until we get this virus out of the country. You say a mask only protects you 50%, but if an entire population of people wore them, then the chances of getting COVID would be greatly decreased. Social distancing (something else people haven't done effectively enough) also helps.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 26, 2021, 07:59:06 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 26, 2021, 05:26:22 AM
Well done.

Yes, sir !

Regarding hospitalization and death rates among Covid patients, the unvaccinated account for over 95%.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/unvaccinated-individuals-now-account-for-the-vast-majority-of-covid-19-hospitalizations-and-deaths-in-the-u-s-according-to-available-data/ (https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/unvaccinated-individuals-now-account-for-the-vast-majority-of-covid-19-hospitalizations-and-deaths-in-the-u-s-according-to-available-data/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 08:29:58 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 03:25:01 AM
Like you, I had hoped to get my shots at a preferred location (senior center in my town), but instead ended up getting it at a big box store with pharmacy just because they had an opening and I was tired of waiting.  The pharmacist was a very nice, professional, young woman who was very thorough in telling me about common reactions, where to get more info, answered any questions I had, etc.  They had several waiting chairs in the area which were carefully spaced apart and were wiped down between patients.  And also good about telling you how long you needed to wait there afterwards to make sure that you were o.k. to leave.  And they also scheduled your follow up appointment that day, etc.

I ended up receiving the Moderna vaccine and other than a sore arm for about a day and a half, felt fine.  Is there any particular reason why you want to only get the Pfizer John?

In any event, good for you for masking up and washing your hands.

PD

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 05:51:55 AMA p.s. to John (Mirror Image) to think about:  Last I knew, you were living with elderly parents?  Thinking about their health as well as your own, perhaps it would be in everyones best interest for you to get your first jab--of something--rather than waiting?  With *Moderna, there was something like a 28 day wait between shots and then it still takes about another two weeks after that for you to be considered fully vaccinated.  In this scenario, say if you received your first shot on September 1, you wouldn't be able to get your second until almost the end of September and then you wouldn't be fully vaccinated for about 10 days to 2 weeks afterward which means roughly mid-October.  Just something to think about.  And, you're right, it's your choice.  You might also consider talking to your health care provider if you have any concerns?  :)
*not certain what the wait-time between shots is with Pfizer.  You could also check to see if you could get the Pfizer elsewhere too?  Just some thoughts.  Want you to be around to chat with about Martinu, Janacek and other Czech composers!  ;D
Best wishes,

PD

My mom got the Pfizer doses earlier in the year, so she's fully vaccinated. My dad has his own concerns as he has an auto-immune disease, but he spoke with his doctor (who is, coincidently my doctor as well) and has been advised to get the vaccine, but she told my dad that it won't be until September before they'll get the Pfizer vaccine back in. I'm going to stick with Pfizer as my mom hasn't had any reactions to it other than an itchy arm. I did know one lady from work who was hospitalized for 4-5 days after getting her second dose of the Moderna. Of course, bad reactions are few and far between concerning the Pfizer and Moderna. The Johnson & Johnson, on the other hand, has had many problems, so I'm definitely not getting that one. One of the great things about the location I work in is there is very little foot traffic and I pretty much work in one area of the store. The only person I work with with any kind of closeness is an older Vietnamese man who got the Moderna earlier in the year and is full vaccinated. I talked with him a lot of about the vaccine and he said the only side effect he had was with the first dose it made him constantly thirsty and the second dose made him hungry all the time. He also complained of a sore arm, but that was only for a day. Anyway, I don't live in a heavily populated area, I don't go out much except to buy groceries or work, but that's it. I might end up calling the Georgia Department of Health and arranging an appointment if things get much worse around here. There's also the NE Georgia Physicians Group that is offering the vaccine that I'm actually looking into right now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 12:14:54 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 08:29:58 AM
My mom got the Pfizer doses earlier in the year, so she's fully vaccinated. My dad has his own concerns as he has an auto-immune disease, but he spoke with his doctor (who is, coincidently my doctor as well) and has been advised to get the vaccine, but she told my dad that it won't be until September before they'll get the Pfizer vaccine back in. I'm going to stick with Pfizer as my mom hasn't had any reactions to it other than an itchy arm. I did know one lady from work who was hospitalized for 4-5 days after getting her second dose of the Moderna. Of course, bad reactions are few and far between concerning the Pfizer and Moderna. The Johnson & Johnson, on the other hand, has had many problems, so I'm definitely not getting that one. One of the great things about the location I work in is there is very little foot traffic and I pretty much work in one area of the store. The only person I work with with any kind of closeness is an older Vietnamese man who got the Moderna earlier in the year and is full vaccinated. I talked with him a lot of about the vaccine and he said the only side effect he had was with the first dose it made him constantly thirsty and the second dose made him hungry all the time. He also complained of a sore arm, but that was only for a day. Anyway, I don't live in a heavily populated area, I don't go out much except to buy groceries or work, but that's it. I might end up calling the Georgia Department of Health and arranging an appointment if things get much worse around here. There's also the NE Georgia Physicians Group that is offering the vaccine that I'm actually looking into right now.
All the best forward with getting your vaccine.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 26, 2021, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 08:29:58 AM
My mom got the Pfizer doses earlier in the year, so she's fully vaccinated. My dad has his own concerns as he has an auto-immune disease, but he spoke with his doctor (who is, coincidently my doctor as well) and has been advised to get the vaccine, but she told my dad that it won't be until September before they'll get the Pfizer vaccine back in. I'm going to stick with Pfizer as my mom hasn't had any reactions to it other than an itchy arm. I did know one lady from work who was hospitalized for 4-5 days after getting her second dose of the Moderna. Of course, bad reactions are few and far between concerning the Pfizer and Moderna. The Johnson & Johnson, on the other hand, has had many problems, so I'm definitely not getting that one. One of the great things about the location I work in is there is very little foot traffic and I pretty much work in one area of the store. The only person I work with with any kind of closeness is an older Vietnamese man who got the Moderna earlier in the year and is full vaccinated. I talked with him a lot of about the vaccine and he said the only side effect he had was with the first dose it made him constantly thirsty and the second dose made him hungry all the time. He also complained of a sore arm, but that was only for a day. Anyway, I don't live in a heavily populated area, I don't go out much except to buy groceries or work, but that's it. I might end up calling the Georgia Department of Health and arranging an appointment if things get much worse around here. There's also the NE Georgia Physicians Group that is offering the vaccine that I'm actually looking into right now.

A reaction to the vaccine is a sign that your body's immune system has recognised it and has started to kick in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 26, 2021, 12:14:54 PM
All the best forward with getting your vaccine.   :)

PD

Thanks, PD. 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 02:27:36 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 26, 2021, 01:49:19 PM
A reaction to the vaccine is a sign that your body's immune system has recognised it and has started to kick in.

Well, a hospital stay of 4-5 days doesn't sound too enticing to me, but I get the jest of what you're saying. ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 26, 2021, 04:25:27 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 02:27:36 PM
Well, a hospital stay of 4-5 days doesn't sound too enticing to me, but I get the jest of what you're saying. ;)

That's any reaction - sore arm, sniffles, headache, etc
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 26, 2021, 10:11:46 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 26, 2021, 01:49:19 PM
A reaction to the vaccine is a sign that your body's immune system has recognised it and has started to kick in.

True. And reportedly the "regular" side effects, or rather: physical responses, are most common and pronounced with those with an more active immune system. The elderly feel rarely more than a sore arm.
I felt rather "off" the 1st day after the 1st dose (Pfizer) and really tired for a couple of days. But yesterday, the day after my 2nd dose, it felt like a heavy flue with a fever and headache, and I spent most of the day in bed. This morning still a bit shaky and tired but feeling much better.
I now also know for certain that I hadn't inadvertently caught COVID before, like at the start of the pandemic, otherwise the response to the vaccine wouldn't be as strong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 27, 2021, 12:16:32 AM
Quote from: Que on July 26, 2021, 10:11:46 PM
True. And reportedly the "regular" side effects, or rather: physical responses, are most common and pronounced with those with an more active immune system. The elderly feel rarely more than a sore arm.
I felt rather "off" the 1st day after the 1st dose (Pfizer) and really tired for a couple of days. But yesterday, the day after my 2nd dose, it felt like a heavy flue with a fever and headache, and I spent most of the day in bed. This morning still a bit shaky and tired but feeling much better.
I now also know for certain that I hadn't inadvertently caught COVID before, like at the start of the pandemic, otherwise the response to the vaccine wouldn't be as strong.

That's interesting. My first shot only produced a slightly sore arm and a one day case of the sniffles yet I'm sure that my immune system works well. I'll find out after dose two on August 14.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 27, 2021, 01:12:59 AM
Quote from: Holden on July 27, 2021, 12:16:32 AM
That's interesting. My first shot only produced a slightly sore arm and a one day case of the sniffles yet I'm sure that my immune system works well. I'll find out after dose two on August 14.

Just don't make any plans for the next day!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 27, 2021, 02:49:38 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 26, 2021, 02:27:36 PM
Well, a hospital stay of 4-5 days doesn't sound too enticing to me, but I get the jest of what you're saying. ;)

CDC studies found 2.5 severe reactions per million Moderna shots administered and no deaths. The person you heard the story about may very well have been hospitalized for something unrelated to the vaccine.

The delta variant is probably 3 times more contagious than the Covid-19 virus that first reached the U.S. You are going to get it sooner or later and without a vaccine you may very well have a severe case. I don't think you can say it is a strictly "personal decision" since you will become a vector for transmitting the virus and a reservoir in which the virus can mutate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 27, 2021, 03:31:57 AM
Quote from: Que on July 26, 2021, 10:11:46 PM
I now also know for certain that I hadn't inadvertently caught COVID before, like at the start of the pandemic, otherwise the response to the vaccine wouldn't be as strong.

Do you have any facts to support this theory?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 27, 2021, 04:05:11 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 27, 2021, 03:31:57 AM
Do you have any facts to support this theory?

* snap *

Side effects become stronger if you've previously been in contact with the virus.  So, if that would have been the case, it would have been apparent at the 1st dose. Which is the only dose those previously exposed get.

https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/why-vaccine-side-effects-might-be-more-common-people-whove-already-had-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 27, 2021, 04:14:26 AM
Quote from: Que on July 27, 2021, 04:05:11 AM
* snap *

Side effects become stronger if you've previously been in contact with the virus.  So, if that would have been the case, it would have been apparent at the 1st dose. Which is the only dose those previously exposed get.

https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/why-vaccine-side-effects-might-be-more-common-people-whove-already-had-covid-19

You seem to have neglected the word "might."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 27, 2021, 05:06:45 AM
Quote from: Que on July 27, 2021, 04:05:11 AM
* snap *

Side effects become stronger if you've previously been in contact with the virus.  So, if that would have been the case, it would have been apparent at the 1st dose. Which is the only dose those previously exposed get.

https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/why-vaccine-side-effects-might-be-more-common-people-whove-already-had-covid-19

I am not sure, that you can conclude this for sure. Even if corona vaccines (in young healthy individuals) often cause more reaction from the immune system than infection does, many individuals experience little or no symptoms even after the second jab, apparently because the first jab only caused a little reaction from the immune system. And if you were infected last year it may have been a very mild infection with little reaction from the immune system, and the symptoms after the first jab might have been few for that reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 27, 2021, 09:08:32 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 27, 2021, 02:49:38 AM
CDC studies found 2.5 severe reactions per million Moderna shots administered and no deaths. The person you heard the story about may very well have been hospitalized for something unrelated to the vaccine.

The delta variant is probably 3 times more contagious than the Covid-19 virus that first reached the U.S. You are going to get it sooner or later and without a vaccine you may very well have a severe case. I don't think you can say it is a strictly "personal decision" since you will become a vector for transmitting the virus and a reservoir in which the virus can mutate.

Is it okay with you that I have had my doubts about the vaccine? Is it okay that I have been questioning these vaccines since they were rolled out across the country last year? You may have had no problem rolling up your sleeve and getting it, but do understand that I have my own concerns and, more importantly, my own brain to make the decision to get it or not. My sister has been fully vaccinated (she had the Pfizer) and she if currently fighting a nasty infection right now that she believes it is COVID, but she'll know for sure in a matter of days as she's been tested for it. Anyway, it's just a question mark for me at the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 27, 2021, 09:20:54 AM
If people want to reach 'herd immunity', then one of the best things to do is stop going to sporting events, concerts, etc. where there are large groups of people. One thing that makes this virus so difficult is the people whether they're vaccinated or not that aren't practicing social distancing. No one here seems concerned that by being around a lot of people (i. e. like one of the afore mentioned social gatherings) that you're quite likely to get COVID if you haven't been doing what the CDC has initially told people they should be doing. They can talk about vaccines until they're blue in the face, but people haven't been doing what they're supposed to be doing since March of last year when the virus broke out. Right now, we have to accept that we're not going to resolve these problems until people have collectively followed these guidelines. People can look at me here (or elsewhere) like I'm an idiot, but going to a basketball game isn't on my agenda.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 27, 2021, 09:22:48 AM
Let me preface this by saying that I DO respect those who have had doubts about the vaccine, whether based on incomplete information or personal health concerns. I also do not blame people who have been misled by the reams of mis- and dis-information out there, conspiracy theories about chip implants and nano-bots and the like - I blame those who put this nonsense out there.

But I also believe that we're at a point where other than possible long-term side effects that won't become apparent for years, the risk profiles of these vaccines in the short term are now well known, and they are very safe. I think that if someone has concerns related to their own health condition, they should consult a trusted physician first and then follow medical advice.

And I think we're also at a point where it's time for countries such as the US to consider doing what certain European countries have done and institute stronger incentives for people to get vaccinated. The carrot only goes so far; it may be time to add the stick. I think we should consider requiring proof of vaccination to get into public establishments, at least in areas where transmission rates are high.

As a small-l libertarian, I do not come to this conclusion easily or lightly. But an individual's freedom to choose is now in sharp conflict with the interests of public health, so something has to change.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on July 27, 2021, 10:42:10 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 27, 2021, 09:20:54 AM
If people want to reach 'herd immunity', then one of the best things to do is stop going to sporting events, concerts, etc. where there are large groups of people.

I agree that we should slow the spread... but that has nothing to do with herd immunity.  To reach herd immunity you need to be vaccinated.  That is it.  We need a large fraction of the population to be vaccinated.  As other posters have said we are at a point where the large number of unvaccinated are creating a health crisis that threatens everyone including the vaccinated.  As Fauci put it, we are at risk of another variant emerging that is resistant to the vaccine.  There is only one way to stop it which is needles in arms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 27, 2021, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: Que on July 27, 2021, 01:12:59 AM
Just don't make any plans for the next day!  :)

It's a Sunday - I'll schedule a lie in. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2021, 09:45:15 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 27, 2021, 09:20:54 AM
If people want to reach 'herd immunity', then one of the best things to do is stop going to sporting events, concerts, etc. where there are large groups of people. One thing that makes this virus so difficult is the people whether they're vaccinated or not that aren't practicing social distancing. No one here seems concerned that by being around a lot of people (i. e. like one of the afore mentioned social gatherings) that you're quite likely to get COVID if you haven't been doing what the CDC has initially told people they should be doing. They can talk about vaccines until they're blue in the face, but people haven't been doing what they're supposed to be doing since March of last year when the virus broke out. Right now, we have to accept that we're not going to resolve these problems until people have collectively followed these guidelines. People can look at me here (or elsewhere) like I'm an idiot, but going to a basketball game isn't on my agenda.

The primary guideline from the CDC, the Surgeon general, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Dr. Fauci) is to get the vaccine. It seems disingenuous to scold people for ignoring social distancing recommendations when you are ignoring the most fundamental guideline.

What impresses me is not that you are an "idiot," but that you are completely focused on yourself, with no concern for the impact your actions have on your community and your country.

When the vaccines went into testing about a year ago I was somewhat skeptical that they would be as effective as some seemed to assume.  I was apprehensive of their safety, given the urgency with which they were developed and tested. Although these doubts were reduced when the FDA's findings on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines were announced, I still felt somewhat apprehensive about being vaccinated. I did it anyway. I felt a satisfying sense of solidarity with my fellow community members, dragging ourselves in to get the shot, despite worries and inconvenience, to do my part to stop this pandemic. Some people I know reported becoming tearful upon receiving the vaccine because of such feelings.

Do you give a thought to the fact that being vaccinated is what you can do to stop this pandemic and protect the most vulnerable in our community.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on July 29, 2021, 05:59:58 PM
I saw this rather disturbing headline (39% Pfizer efficacy in Israel) on an article last week:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/23/delta-variant-pfizer-covid-vaccine-39percent-effective-in-israel-prevents-severe-illness.html

I've seen some commentaries / counter-claims since then, but nothing definitive. I'd been pleased with my fully Pfizer-vaccinated status, but am now getting concerned and reading any booster info that appears.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on July 29, 2021, 06:16:08 PM
M.I., I'm with Spotted Horses. I respect you as a valuable contributor to this forum and I appreciate your anger at the carelessness and selfishness of many of our country's citizens. But the latter only serves to underline the unavoidable cognitive dissonance in your position. At this point there's no legitimate reason to doubt the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. Go get the damn shots.

I was vaccinated (Pfizer) back in February and March. I had virtually no reaction to either dose, except for a slightly sore arm around the injection site. My wife and her octogenarian parents (who live with us) were vaccinated around the same time. They are all at high risk, her parents due to their age and other health concerns, and my wife because she has severe asthma. COVID could easily be fatal to her. So this is no trivial matter to me. Please get vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2021, 09:45:15 AMDo you give a thought to the fact that being vaccinated is what you can do to stop this pandemic and protect the most vulnerable in our community.

I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:41:37 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2021, 09:45:15 AMThe primary guideline from the CDC, the Surgeon general, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Dr. Fauci) is to get the vaccine. It seems disingenuous to scold people for ignoring social distancing recommendations when you are ignoring the most fundamental guideline.

What impresses me is not that you are an "idiot," but that you are completely focused on yourself, with no concern for the impact your actions have on your community and your country.

When the vaccines went into testing about a year ago I was somewhat skeptical that they would be as effective as some seemed to assume.  I was apprehensive of their safety, given the urgency with which they were developed and tested. Although these doubts were reduced when the FDA's findings on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines were announced, I still felt somewhat apprehensive about being vaccinated. I did it anyway. I felt a satisfying sense of solidarity with my fellow community members, dragging ourselves in to get the shot, despite worries and inconvenience, to do my part to stop this pandemic. Some people I know reported becoming tearful upon receiving the vaccine because of such feelings.

If you're done lecturing me, I'd like to make the point that we wouldn't be in the position we are currently in if people did their civic duty and stayed the hell away from each other. It's funny that you're going on and on about how I'm focused on myself, but make no comment about the general public who are actually a part of the larger threat (whether they're vaccinated or not). Do you think going to sporting events, concerts, festivals, etc. is prudent at this point in time? Team USA in the Olympics have sent a number of athletes home because they have COVID and I'm sure all of these people have been fully vaccinated. It's not that I'm against getting the vaccine, it's just that I'm reading some conflicting reports about their effectiveness. Anyway, your point (and Alek Hidell) has been made. There's no need to further reiterate your position. I'll be off next week for five days and I plan on getting the first dose during that time off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on July 29, 2021, 10:47:30 PM
Some people are cowards, and have tried all arguments there are to avoid getting a jab. That they could potentially infect others that might die does not weigh in their considerations. And there are many of them, especially in the south of America. Being part in the process of administering and coordinating vaccins, I see that in the Netherlands the percentage of people that are willing to put childishness aside, and get their jab, is going up, and the Delta + is pushed back. There is simply no argument to say no, unless you are a egoist par excellance, or have a death wish, and prepared to take others with you!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 29, 2021, 10:57:53 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

It's very rare that the vaccine doesn't do its job. Hoping for a quick recovery soon, I read from your earlier post that she felt unwell a few days ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 30, 2021, 12:16:47 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on July 29, 2021, 10:47:30 PM
I see that in the Netherlands the percentage of people that are willing to put childishness aside, and get their jab, is going up, and the Delta + is pushed back.

Latest numbers indicate that 90% wants to be vaccinated, which would be wonderful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 12:21:38 AM
Quote from: Que on July 30, 2021, 12:16:47 AM
Latest numbers indicate that 90% wants to be vaccinated, which would be wonderful.

What has caused this change in public opinion? Is it 90% of people over a certain age?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 12:36:57 AM
Watch out EU - batten down the hatches - beta variant in Hauts de France

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2021/jul/30/uk-covid-live-news-coronavirus-delta-variant-vaccine-amber-list
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 30, 2021, 12:49:25 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:41:37 PM
If you're done lecturing me, I'd like to make the point that we wouldn't be in the position we are currently in if people did their civic duty and stayed the hell away from each other. It's funny that you're going on and on about how I'm focused on myself, but make no comment about the general public who are actually a part of the larger threat (whether they're vaccinated or not). Do you think going to sporting events, concerts, festivals, etc. is prudent at this point in time? Team USA in the Olympics have sent a number of athletes home because they have COVID and I'm sure all of these people have been fully vaccinated. It's not that I'm against getting the vaccine, it's just that I'm reading some conflicting reports about their effectiveness. Anyway, your point (and Alek Hidell) has been made. There's no need to further reiterate your position. I'll be off next week for five days and I plan on getting the first dose during that time off.

The BIG problem here is of course, that society and economy doesn't work properly when people stay away from each other and don't go to sporting events and concerts. People need social interaction. Introverts less than extroverts, but we all do. This is about finetuning the openness of the society while trying to control the virus.

What comes to vaccines, there isn't controversy (among reasonable people interested about the truth) about whether they are effective. The question is how effective they are? We know they are VERY effective against serious illness and deaths. How much do they protect from getting the virus yourself and spreading it to others is another thing (and seems to be highly dependant of the virus variant), but if the vaccines tame Covid-19 into a "flu" it is a BIG win in this battle.

Good luck with getting your first dose. I'll be getting my second tomorrow.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 30, 2021, 05:40:12 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

Best of luck to her for a quick and full recovery. Hopefully her symptoms are mild. The odds are definitely on her side - the percentage of fully vaccinated people who have been hospitalized (or worse) with covid is minuscule.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 30, 2021, 05:48:59 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:41:37 PM
I'll be off next week for five days and I plan on getting the first dose during that time off.

Firstly, very sorry to hear that your sister has contracted Covid and hope that she fully recovers and soon!

Secondly, I'm delighted to hear that you will be getting your vaccine next week and hope that all goes smoothly.  Please keep in touch here and let us know how it all goes and any reactions.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on July 30, 2021, 07:50:01 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:41:37 PM
I'll be off next week for five days and I plan on getting the first dose during that time off.

Great news!  Good luck!  You'll have nothing to worry about.  Oh... but in case you die may I have your cd collection? 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 08:46:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 12:36:57 AM
Watch out EU - batten down the hatches - beta variant in Hauts de France

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2021/jul/30/uk-covid-live-news-coronavirus-delta-variant-vaccine-amber-list

And more reasons not to be cheerful

"Spain – where Beta cases have risen by 14.2% in the past four weeks"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/30/uk-minister-seeks-to-calm-row-over-france-covid-travel-curbs
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 30, 2021, 09:42:21 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

Warm wishes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 30, 2021, 09:56:32 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

I and my wife (48 and 47 respectively) had Covid in early March and we were not vaccinated. Had only minor symptoms (the most annoying being the loss of smell and taste but it didn't last long for me, longer for my wife, though --- she's not fully recovered yet in this respect). Your sister being vaccinated, she shouldn't have any problems. Best wishes to her, hoping for a quick and full recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 27, 2021, 02:49:38 AM
CDC studies found 2.5 severe reactions per million Moderna shots administered and no deaths. The person you heard the story about may very well have been hospitalized for something unrelated to the vaccine.

The delta variant is probably 3 times more contagious than the Covid-19 virus that first reached the U.S. You are going to get it sooner or later and without a vaccine you may very well have a severe case. I don't think you can say it is a strictly "personal decision" since you will become a vector for transmitting the virus and a reservoir in which the virus can mutate.

The idea that if you're vaccinated then you're less of a vector, or less of a reservoir for mutations, is possibly wishful thinking

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/30/health/breakthrough-infection-masks-cdc-provincetown-study/index.html

If that's right, it's harder to make out the argument from social responsibility for vaccination that you've been using against Mirror Image.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 30, 2021, 10:36:20 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:16:37 PM
I just found out that my sister has COVID. She works for the health department (restaurant health inspector) and has been fully vaccinated (Pfizer). Let's hope that the vaccine does its job effectively, but, more importantly, I hope she makes a full recovery.

Very sorry to hear this. Hopefully the vaccine will prevent severe illness, as data indicates it does in most cases.

Quote from: Mirror Image on July 29, 2021, 08:41:37 PM
I'll be off next week for five days and I plan on getting the first dose during that time off.

Very glad to hear this. The risk is small and the potential benefit large.

Quote from: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 10:25:35 AM
The idea that if you're vaccinated then you're less of a vector, or less of a reservoir for mutations, is possibly wishful thinking

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/30/health/breakthrough-infection-masks-cdc-provincetown-study/index.html

If that's right, it's harder to make out the argument from social responsibility for vaccination that you've been using against Mirror Image.

This is very concerning, I agree. The CDC indicated that there was conclusive data that the vaccines reduce transmission for the Covid-19 variants that were circulating at the start of the epidemic, but seem to indicate that delta variant is behaving differently.

It should be a straightforward task to reformulate the mRNA vaccines so that they are based on the delta variant spike domain. Perhaps that will be decisive. Otherwise we are in for a rough ride.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 30, 2021, 11:52:54 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 30, 2021, 10:36:20 AM

This is very concerning, I agree. The CDC indicated that there was conclusive data that the vaccines reduce transmission for the Covid-19 variants that were circulating at the start of the epidemic, but seem to indicate that delta variant is behaving differently.

It should be a straightforward task to reformulate the mRNA vaccines so that they are based on the delta variant spike domain. Perhaps that will be decisive. Otherwise we are in for a rough ride.
Perhaps it might be a case of a booster shot for the Delta variant?  Or are there studies that think that we would need to get a 2-shot (or whatever is needed) in terms of a new vaccine?  Probably being overly hopeful here.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 12:27:22 PM
The thing to say is that it's a very small study and probably not true. But it does show how precarious our understanding of the disease is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on July 30, 2021, 01:05:20 PM
Just heard that the Delta variant is as contagious as the chicken pox.   :o

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 30, 2021, 01:25:39 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 12:27:22 PM
The thing to say is that it's a very small study and probably not true. But it does show how precarious our understanding of the disease is.

Yes. there are conflicting results of studies and experts disagree. The Danish Serum Institute has found out - now the Delta variant has become predominant here, that fully vaccinated people only constitute 1% of those which contract the disease, and they tend to be hospitalized much less than unvaccinated people. Maybe some of the reason of the low percentage is that vaccinated persons get fewer symptoms and tend to be tested less.

Our health authorities think that we only need to give the particularly vulnerable group a third jab in the course of the next 6 months, but a Danish expert (Jens Østergaard) says, that we will need to give all vaccinated people a third jab to cope with the Delta variant . I hope they find out before it's too late.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 01:29:05 PM
Is there clear evidence that the vaccines are effective at stopping you catching delta - I know they are effective at stopping symptoms. I just can't see anything about this online!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 30, 2021, 01:45:39 PM
CDC study shows three-fourths of people infected in Massachusetts covid-19 outbreak were vaccinated but few required hospitalization (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07/30/provincetown-covid-outbreak-vaccinated/)

Critically, the study found that vaccinated individuals carried as much virus in their noses as unvaccinated individuals, and that vaccinated people could spread the virus to each other. The CDC was criticized this week for changing its mask guidance without publishing the data it relied on. The report released Friday contains that data.

...

Scientists said the Provincetown outbreak and other recent data on breakthrough infections make clear that the vaccines offer significant protection, as they were designed to, against severe illness and death but do not offer blanket protection against any chance of infection. Only a handful of people in the outbreak were hospitalized, but four of them were fully vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 30, 2021, 02:35:06 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 01:29:05 PM
Is there clear evidence that the vaccines are effective at stopping you catching delta - I know they are effective at stopping symptoms. I just can't see anything about this online!

I think the consensus is that vaccines reduce the risk of getting infection, but there is doubt as to how much, and there is also doubt as to how much the vaccinated, infected persons are prone to infect others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 30, 2021, 02:36:48 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 30, 2021, 01:45:39 PM
CDC study shows three-fourths of people infected in Massachusetts covid-19 outbreak were vaccinated but few required hospitalization (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07/30/provincetown-covid-outbreak-vaccinated/)

Quite a difference between 1% and 75%.  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 30, 2021, 09:00:29 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 30, 2021, 09:56:32 AM
I and my wife (48 and 47 respectively) had Covid in early March and we were not vaccinated. Had only minor symptoms (the most annoying being the loss of smell and taste but it didn't last long for me, longer for my wife, though --- she's not fully recovered yet in this respect). Your sister being vaccinated, she shouldn't have any problems. Best wishes to her, hoping for a quick and full recovery!

Thank you, Andrei.

Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 30, 2021, 10:36:20 AM
Very sorry to hear this. Hopefully the vaccine will prevent severe illness, as data indicates it does in most cases.

I appreciate it, SH.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on July 30, 2021, 09:03:58 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on July 30, 2021, 05:48:59 AM
Firstly, very sorry to hear that your sister has contracted Covid and hope that she fully recovers and soon!

Secondly, I'm delighted to hear that you will be getting your vaccine next week and hope that all goes smoothly.  Please keep in touch here and let us know how it all goes and any reactions.

Best wishes,

PD

Thanks, PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 09:05:00 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 30, 2021, 02:35:06 PM
I think the consensus is that vaccines reduce the risk of getting infection, but there is doubt as to how much, and there is also doubt as to how much the vaccinated, infected persons are prone to infect others.

But no evidence - don't forget the consensus was that vaccination is effective against transmission!

Interesting to be watching the cutting edge of a science operate - everything is so precarious, everything rests on temporary consensus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 31, 2021, 12:22:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 30, 2021, 09:05:00 PM
But no evidence - don't forget the consensus was that vaccination is effective against transmission!

Interesting to be watching the cutting edge of a science operate - everything is so precarious, everything rests on temporary consensus.

Science is typically slow process. Covid-19 has been a thing for less than 2 years and the latest variants much less. Vaccines might have been effective against the transmission of the original virus, but the variants are different beasts. The most important thing is the vaccines are effective against serious illness and deaths. 100 % certainty is luxury. Often temporary consensus is the best we can do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 31, 2021, 05:51:14 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 31, 2021, 12:22:24 AM
Science is typically slow process. Covid-19 has been a thing for less than 2 years and the latest variants much less. Vaccines might have been effective against the transmission of the original virus, but the variants are different beasts. The most important thing is the vaccines are effective against serious illness and deaths. 100 % certainty is luxury. Often temporary consensus is the best we can do.

Yes. Of course, the problem is that the general public does not understand how science works - at least here in the US. And there is a sizeable minority here who interpret the shifting guidance as evidence of "flip-flopping", that the "experts" really don't know what they're on about. The correlation between reaction to shifting expert guidance and political persuasion is rather striking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 06:12:55 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 31, 2021, 12:22:24 AM
Science is typically slow process. Covid-19 has been a thing for less than 2 years and the latest variants much less. Vaccines might have been effective against the transmission of the original virus, but the variants are different beasts. The most important thing is the vaccines are effective against serious illness and deaths. 100 % certainty is luxury. Often temporary consensus is the best we can do.

Yes, it doesn't, cannot serve for instant gratification.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 06:13:55 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 31, 2021, 05:51:14 AM
Yes. Of course, the problem is that the general public does not understand how science works - at least here in the US. And there is a sizeable minority here who interpret the shifting guidance as evidence of "flip-flopping", that the "experts" really don't know what they're on about. The correlation between reaction to shifting expert guidance and political persuasion is rather striking.

And no mere coincidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:21:10 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 31, 2021, 05:51:14 AM
Yes. Of course, the problem is that the general public does not understand how science works - at least here in the US.

Yes. But the problem in the UK is not with the general public, it is with the media and with the scientists themselves. The media oversimplify and encourage people to think the worst, because fear sells papers and makes for clicks. And the scientists themselves, for political or other reasons, present their view as the truth when in fact it is highly debatable. 

The third problem, and maybe the most conceptually difficult, is that managing the crisis is much much more than science. The covid crisis is not caused by a virus. It is caused by the interaction of a virus with society. And so the best way to manage it is determined by both health science and social science - political, economic, psychological, moral -  considerations.

There is a concept in politics of populism -- the idea is that political leaders influence media to  present grossly oversimplified views about economy or crime or whatever, in order to curry favour with the public.  In the UK we see all the time covid populism from Government and Opposition, from civil service scientists and from independent scientists  -- a gross oversimplification of issues to do with border controls, masks, making schools safe, travel restrictions, employers' responsibilities, quarantine etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 06:44:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:21:10 AM
the scientists themselves, for political or other reasons, present their view as the truth when in fact it is highly debatable.

Thomas Kuhn knew, and said, it many decades ago.

Aldous Huxley foresaw it many decades ago.

We are living in a dictatorship of scientists / experts. And not even that, actually in a dictatorship of the consensus.

As a close acquaintance of mine told me recently, if a "famous expert" told on prime air TV that kissing each other asses increases the IQ, three quarters of the populace would instantly start doing just that.

Welcome to the brave new world!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:51:54 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 06:44:37 AM
Thomas Kuhn knew, and said, it many decades ago.

Aldous Huxley foresaw it many decades ago.

We are living in a dictatorship of scientists / experts. And not even that, actually in a dictatorship of the consensus.

As a close acquaintance of mine told me recently, if a "famous expert" told on prime air TV that kissing each other asses increases the IQ, three quarters of the populace would instantly start doing just that.

Welcome to the brave new world!

There's a real danger that we're sleepwalking into some sort of dictatorship. The scientists only have influence because of the way they're presented on the media, and the media is in the control of capital.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 07:02:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:51:54 AM
There's a real danger that we're sleepwalking into some sort of dictatorship. The scientists only have influence because of the way they're presented on the media, and the media is in the control of capital.

The blind faith in science/scientists is just as irrational as the blind faith in this or that religion and their priests that some scientists decry.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 07:08:36 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 07:02:25 AM
The blind faith in science/scientists is just as irrational as the blind faith in this or that religion and their priests that some scientists decry.

The method of science leads to ideas which we are justified in asserting, justified because they are predictive and explanatory ideas. Religion doesn't.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 07:09:43 AM
Have a listen to this Andrei, if you can get it in Romania. I think it's quite interesting

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000y7sq
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on July 31, 2021, 07:17:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 06:44:37 AM
We are living in a dictatorship of scientists / experts. And not even that, actually in a dictatorship of the consensus.


1 we're NOT living in a dictatorship

2 and certainly not in a dictatorship of experts. Experts have never been in lower esteem than now, what with everybody with an internet connection considering him- or herself an expert.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 07:31:51 AM
Quote from: Herman on July 31, 2021, 07:17:29 AM
1 we're NOT living in a dictatorship


Yes. Now, what are we living in? Is it closer to a democracy than a dictatorship?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 08:07:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 07:57:55 AM
Democracy was always an illusion / delusion.

We are living in that eternal, neverchanging, unchanging form of government --- oligarchy!

It can disguise itself as democracy --- yet it will always stay the same.

The few will always rule over the many.

We are living in parliamentary capitalism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 08:10:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:21:10 AM
Yes. But the problem in the UK is not with the general public, it is with the media and with the scientists themselves. The media oversimplify and encourage people to think the worst, because fear sells papers and makes for clicks. And the scientists themselves, for political or other reasons, present their view as the truth when in fact it is highly debatable. 

The third problem, and maybe the most conceptually difficult, is that managing the crisis is much much more than science. The covid crisis is not caused by a virus. It is caused by the interaction of a virus with society. And so the best way to manage it is determined by both health science and social science - political, economic, psychological, moral -  considerations.

There is a concept in politics of populism -- the idea is that political leaders influence media to  present grossly oversimplified views about economy or crime or whatever, in order to curry favour with the public.  In the UK we see all the time covid populism from Government and Opposition, from civil service scientists and from independent scientists  -- a gross oversimplification of issues to do with border controls, masks, making schools safe, travel restrictions, employers' responsibilities, quarantine etc.

Points well taken. Here in the US, at least, atop legitimate concerns that the media ain't doing their job properly, is the kneejerk know-nothingism of the MAGA-verse, a depressingly true likeness of the disgraced former president's "intellect," feeding on conspiracy-theory clickbait, and serving as throughput for rubbish.

Pace Andrei, I don't see the US Left kissing experts' asses (what a fellow he can be) but looking for reliable information in an "information ecosystem" which numerous and tireless bad-faith actors continually pollute.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 08:36:03 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 08:15:26 AM
See you in Heaven, Karl! I trust for certain we'll meet again!

I think, friend, you mistake me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 08:43:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 08:37:59 AM
We shall die and we shall see.

As you like.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 09:31:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 08:54:52 AM
There was a time , Karl, when I thought you were a convinced Orthodox Christian. Nowadays it seems to me you are no more any such fellow -- you're even a non-Christian at heart.

What a curious statement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 31, 2021, 09:56:54 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 31, 2021, 05:51:14 AM
The problem is that the general public does not understand how science works - at least here in the US.

That's due to failure of the education system. That can be fixed by transforming the schools into places that effectively teach scientific literacy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 10:16:21 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 08:54:52 AM
There was a time , Karl, when I thought you were a convinced Orthodox Christian. Nowadays it seems to me you are no more any such fellow -- you're even a non-Christian at heart.

I am a mere sinner, yet I'll pray for you, my brother!

May Jesus Christ Our Lord have mercy on our souls!

I certainly appreciate your prayers!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 31, 2021, 11:09:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 07:02:25 AM
The blind faith in science/scientists is just as irrational as the blind faith in this or that religion and their priests that some scientists decry.

Faith in religion is always blind, because it never builds upon facts.

Science builds upon experimental facts, but they are always relative and objects to continual revision. Every scientist knows this.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 11:23:32 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 31, 2021, 09:56:54 AM
That's due to failure of the education system. That can be fixed by transforming the schools into places that effectively teach scientific literacy.

They did, on a time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 11:24:46 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 30, 2021, 02:36:48 PM
Quite a difference between 1% and 75%.  ???

Certainly a vaccine success story, looked at like that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 31, 2021, 12:43:16 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 31, 2021, 11:24:46 AM
Certainly a vaccine success story, looked at like that.

Too good to be true, I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 01:01:26 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 31, 2021, 12:43:16 PM
Too good to be true, I think.

Ah, I follow you.

79 fully vaccinated Massachusetts residents have died, 303 hospitalized in very rare COVID 'breakthrough' cases, officials say (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/13/nation/state-says-number-covid-cases-vaccinated-people-is-incredibly-low/?p1=SectionFront_Feed_ContentQuery)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 31, 2021, 03:09:35 PM
I get a kick out of people who use their personal computers and the internet to give voice to anti science rubbish.


Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2021, 06:44:37 AM

As a close acquaintance of mine told me recently, if a "famous expert" told on prime air TV that kissing each other asses increases the IQ, three quarters of the populace would instantly start doing just that.


One famous expert? With no consensus from the wider and disparate scientific community? And without presenting evidence or argument? This is something you - and your "close acquaintance " - actually believe is it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 04:05:37 PM
Yet, Gov. De Santis doesn't think his "performance" can possibly improved upon:

"Florida breaks record with more than 21,000 new COVID cases; Mask guidance divides parents heading into new school year."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 04:24:14 PM
Quote from: Dr. Irwin RedlenerThe latest data is showing us something very important: that with the new Delta variant, the viral load, the amount of virus carried by an infected person, is the same whether or not that person has been vaccinated. This is a different situation than we understood before, with previous variants and the original virus, because all three of the vaccinations available here—Moderna, Pfizer, and J&J—were able to suppress the amount of virus. Not eliminate it, necessarily, but certainly we were seeing big differences in the virus load being carried by vaccinated versus unvaccinated. That no longer seems to be the case. Even though the vaccines will, by and large, prevent very serious illness or death in a person who gets infected with the Delta variant, it turns out that the vaccines do not suppress the amount of virus in a person's body.

Which means that we can tell you as a vaccinated person, you're very, very likely going to be protected from having to go on a ventilator or die. But what we can not say is that you'll have less virus that you could then spread around. That makes you, as a vaccinated person, a potential threat to people who are still vulnerable. And we have a situation in the United States where we have 100 million people or so who have never had the disease, and who have never been vaccinated and who are vulnerable to getting infected by a vaccinated person who's contracted the Delta variant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 31, 2021, 04:27:25 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 31, 2021, 08:10:41 AM
Points well taken. Here in the US, at least, atop legitimate concerns that the media ain't doing their job properly, is the kneejerk know-nothingism of the MAGA-verse, a depressingly true likeness of the disgraced former president's "intellect," feeding on conspiracy-theory clickbait, and serving as throughput for rubbish.

Pace Andrei, I don't see the US Left kissing experts' asses (what a fellow he can be) but looking for reliable information in an "information ecosystem" which numerous and tireless bad-faith actors continually pollute.

So we have what Trump has done intentionally to undermine the credibility of science, coupled with the fact that we keep learning new data. (https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-trumps-world-of-bullshit-unleashed-todays-delta-hell?ref=home)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 31, 2021, 04:24:14 PM


I think this is a good example of covid populism, an example of why science has got a bad name in the pandemic. The problem, and it is a serious one, is in the first clause: the latest data showing us something very important. The paper in question does not show anything - the sample is too small for that. It suggests something possibly, an area for further investigation, an unlikely possibility. But it doesn't show anything.

But here we see it used to project the scientist Redlener into a prime media position, someone who knows an important fact, a voice who gives us a solemn warning. And we all know that fear means clicks, and clicks mean money.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 31, 2021, 11:23:11 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on July 31, 2021, 06:21:10 AM
Yes. But the problem in the UK is not with the general public, it is with the media and with the scientists themselves. The media oversimplify and encourage people to think the worst, because fear sells papers and makes for clicks. And the scientists themselves, for political or other reasons, present their view as the truth when in fact it is highly debatable. 

The third problem, and maybe the most conceptually difficult, is that managing the crisis is much much more than science. The covid crisis is not caused by a virus. It is caused by the interaction of a virus with society. And so the best way to manage it is determined by both health science and social science - political, economic, psychological, moral -  considerations.

There is a concept in politics of populism -- the idea is that political leaders influence media to  present grossly oversimplified views about economy or crime or whatever, in order to curry favour with the public.  In the UK we see all the time covid populism from Government and Opposition, from civil service scientists and from independent scientists  -- a gross oversimplification of issues to do with border controls, masks, making schools safe, travel restrictions, employers' responsibilities, quarantine etc.

You and I are on the same page Howard and especially in the first paragraph. One phrase I like is "civil service scientists" and every country has one who is deemed to be an expert and their political motives are not questioned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Stürmisch Bewegt on August 01, 2021, 05:34:13 AM
Welcome to my town, St. Louis, USA. This has gone far beyond mere sport, political preference, racism, or lack of education, etc : THIS is socio-pathology in action.  https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/01/us/st-louis-mask-meeting-covid-19-positive/index.html 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 01, 2021, 07:37:28 AM
There is, I think, something really strange happening in England, which isn't being taken up by the media. As far as I can see, hospital admissions have started to plateau.

Case numbers from testing figures are way below where people expected, no-one is sure why. But cases are hard to get a grip on, admissions data is a more secure indication of the progress of the epidemic.

If I'm right that it's plateauing, it's a mystery at the moment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 01, 2021, 07:39:26 AM
Still collecting and collating
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 07:40:40 AM
In DK, an official survey tells that 0.005% of vaccinated people experienced serious side effects of the vaccine so far, most of them temporary, however.

3.2 mio have had their two jabs, 1 mio have received only the first one yet, so 72% of the total population have had or begun vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 07:54:12 AM
Concerning the UK, our newspapers report that the virus is receding, probably due to the vaccine effect, yet a bit surprising concerning the opening up and Delta.

Here in DK, it's been rather stable for weeks, but the level is a bit too high, in spite of hardly any fatalities, about 750-1200 cases per day or 0.8 - 1.7 % of tested people, and we're hoping for it to drop. Delta is 95% of cases. Younger, unvaccinated people are now experiencing harder sickness.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on August 01, 2021, 08:30:18 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 07:40:40 AM
In DK, an official survey tells that 0.005% of vaccinated people experienced serious side effects of the vaccine so far, most of them temporary, however.

3.2 mio have had their two jabs, 1 mio have received only the first one yet, so 72% of the total population have had or begun vaccines.

Might as well take the world numbers if you want to look at side effects. 3.8 billion vaccine shots have been put into arms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 08:40:53 AM
DK is almost only Pfizer and Moderna, and the registration of side effects likely very thorough. So far, vaccinations have been mostly carried through in countries with a modern and well-developed health sector, though.

But Bhutan for instance apparently has now reached 90% coverage with donations of AZ from India and Denmark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 01, 2021, 08:53:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 07:54:12 AM
Concerning the UK, our newspapers report that the virus is receding, probably due to the vaccine effect, yet a bit surprising concerning the opening up and Delta.


Receding in the sense of growing more slowly, probably. If that's right, it is very unexpected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 01, 2021, 12:57:54 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 01, 2021, 07:40:40 AM
3.2 mio have had their two jabs, 1 mio have received only the first one yet, so 72% of the total population have had or begun vaccines.

Here in DK, it's been rather stable for weeks, but the level is a bit too high, in spite of hardly any fatalities, about 750-1200 cases per day or 0.8 - 1.7 % of tested people, and we're hoping for it to drop. Delta is 95% of cases. Younger, unvaccinated people are now experiencing harder sickness.

Finland is not quite finished yet with the vaccinations: 3.7 million (66.2 %) people have gotten one or two jab(s) and of those 1.95 million (35.1 %) now including me both jabs. Cases have been skyrocketing from less than 100 per day mid June to 600-800 now. Delta variant + loosened restrictions for the summer + Covid fatigue among teenagers and young adults are mostly behind this, but since the cases are mostly people less than 40 years old while older people and risk groups have been so well vaccinated (of people over 70 almost 90 % are fully vaccinated), hospitalizations have stayed somewhat low.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on August 01, 2021, 04:15:24 PM
Quote from: Stürmisch Bewegt on August 01, 2021, 05:34:13 AM
Welcome to my town, St. Louis, USA. This has gone far beyond mere sport, political preference, racism, or lack of education, etc : THIS is socio-pathology in action.  https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/01/us/st-louis-mask-meeting-covid-19-positive/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/01/us/st-louis-mask-meeting-covid-19-positive/index.html)

Ah, yes, I know it well. I'm from (almost) next door, in Oklahoma, and since it's an even redder state than Missouri you can imagine what's going on here. Our legislature has been busy passing laws banning mask mandates in public schools, universities, municipalities, and so on.

Meanwhile, back in reality: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/oklahoma-covid-cases.html (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/oklahoma-covid-cases.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on August 01, 2021, 06:21:43 PM
Alek, here in South Carolina the budget has a proviso that if any school district institutes a mask mandate they will immediately lose their funding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 01, 2021, 06:39:55 PM
Quote from: DavidW on August 01, 2021, 06:21:43 PM
Alek, here in South Carolina the budget has a proviso that if any school district institutes a mask mandate they will immediately lose their funding.

Jesus H. Bungee-Jumping Christ!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 02, 2021, 07:27:36 AM
Well, I'm pretty sure that admissions have peaked in the UK. What the consequences of the UK strategy will be for long covid and for mutations is anyone's guess of course. And it's anyone's guess what will happen next month when schools open and when the level of immunity in the population is different. But so far, the UK approach is looking good.

I wonder what the EU will do now, what do you think Que? Follow in our footsteps?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 02, 2021, 07:35:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 02, 2021, 07:27:36 AM
I wonder what the EU will do now, what do you think Que? Follow in our footsteps?

Well, the EU is not in charge of healthcare nor responsible for measures against the pandemic. Though I'm sure that will change in the future.

So, it's up to individual member states how to proceed from here. And vaccination & infection rates vary greatly between countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 02, 2021, 08:56:58 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 01, 2021, 06:39:55 PM
Jesus H. Bungee-Jumping Christ!

Indeed. That's an undisguised non-mask mandate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 02, 2021, 09:26:45 AM
Germany will now offer fully vaccinated - in their system - a third jab already from September. It's called a 'booster-jab'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 02, 2021, 09:53:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 02, 2021, 09:26:45 AM
Germany will now offer fully vaccinated - in their system - a third jab already from September. It's called a 'booster-jab'.
Interesting.  Does that apply to all of the vaccines or just certain ones?  As far as I know, the J&J is only a one-shot vaccine.  I imagine that this is for Moderna and Pfizer then?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on August 03, 2021, 07:00:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 02, 2021, 07:27:36 AM
Well, I'm pretty sure that admissions have peaked in the UK. What the consequences of the UK strategy will be for long covid and for mutations is anyone's guess of course. And it's anyone's guess what will happen next month when schools open and when the level of immunity in the population is different. But so far, the UK approach is looking good.

I wonder what the EU will do now, what do you think Que? Follow in our footsteps?

I find it ironic that soothsayers warned that Brexit would result in shortages and Supermarket shelves would be stripped bare with lorries lined up across the channel with their cargo going to waste. Didn't happen of course, only for the British Government with their "pinging" NHS app shooting themselves in the foot which resulted in shortages across the board. We can't even blame the dastardly EU. >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 03, 2021, 11:06:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 02, 2021, 09:53:01 AM
Interesting.  Does that apply to all of the vaccines or just certain ones?  As far as I know, the J&J is only a one-shot vaccine.  I imagine that this is for Moderna and Pfizer then?

PD

It seems to be a Pfizer or Moderna, regardless of what vaccine you already had ... there are quite a lot of studies now telling of benefits of a 'cocktail' of vaccines.

Two very leading experts here in DK foretell a rising pandemic in the autumn, and likely further close downs/restrictions, because of new variants and cooler climate, and in spite of the relatively high level of vaccinations reached thus far  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 03, 2021, 04:31:02 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 03, 2021, 11:06:53 AM
It seems to be a Pfizer or Moderna, regardless of what vaccine you already had ... there are quite a lot of studies now telling of benefits of a 'cocktail' of vaccines.

Two very leading experts here in DK foretell a rising pandemic in the autumn, and likely further close downs/restrictions, because of new variants and cooler climate, and in spite of the relatively high level of vaccinations reached thus far  ???
Yes, I had heard of the "cocktail approach".  I hope that it can help.

Scary thoughts re the fall.  Not even that late here in the US; earlier today I was reading about the rapid surge of Covid cases starting to inundate Florida hospitals in some areas.   :(https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58077209

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Alek Hidell on August 03, 2021, 05:28:27 PM
Quote from: DavidW on August 01, 2021, 06:21:43 PM
Alek, here in South Carolina the budget has a proviso that if any school district institutes a mask mandate they will immediately lose their funding.

Yeah, not very surprising coming from the birthplace of treason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 03, 2021, 05:29:36 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 03, 2021, 04:31:02 PM
Yes, I had heard of the "cocktail approach".  I hope that it can help.

Scary thoughts re the fall.  Not even that late here in the US; earlier today I was reading about the rapid surge of Covid cases starting to inundate Florida hospitals in some areas.   :(https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58077209

Best wishes,

PD

Quote from: Alek Hidell on August 03, 2021, 05:28:27 PM
Yeah, not very surprising coming from the birthplace of treason.

The Trumpist death cult on parade.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 04, 2021, 03:45:36 AM
Antibody levels above 90% in every nation of the UK - ONS
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/antibodies


Can anyone who knows about science tell me what this means as far as the COVID crisis is concerned? What does it mean for incidence, for symptoms, that sort of stuff?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 04, 2021, 04:12:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 04, 2021, 03:45:36 AM
Antibody levels above 90% in every nation of the UK - ONS
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/antibodies


Can anyone who knows about science tell me what this means as far as the COVID crisis is concerned? What does it mean for incidence, for symptoms, that sort of stuff?

This may be of interest (if you haven't read it already):

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-94719-y

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on August 04, 2021, 04:47:48 AM
That the actual vaccines to a large extent protect against serious symptomps, if one catches the covid19 but don't protect against infection as such to the same degree - at least what concerns the Delta variant -  means, that the Delta variant possibly can't be eradicated with the help of the existing vaccines, because there will still be a number of asymptomatic infections to maintain the virus, even if vaccinated people may be less contagious than unvaccinated people.. And this will also mean, that the risk of the emergence of vaccine resistant virus variants or more virulent variants still will be there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 05, 2021, 12:28:16 PM
State scientific authorities here, the SSI, backing out on the question of attaining any complete herd immunity via vaccines: due to mutations, it will be unattainable, even with a vaccination level of 85% or more among the population. 100% coverage simply won't be possible, the vaccines aren't 100% protective, and there are imported cases all the time too.

Therefore, the aim must be to 1) reduce and halt the level of infections in society 2) reduce its dangerousness to health 3) think of it now rather as an ordinary flu, not that much of a disaster any longer; psychologically we're also much more used to flus as a re-occurring phenomenon 4) moreover: epidemics tend to die out after 2-5 years, an expert says. This might be the case here too.

1) - 2) has generally been attained here; the number of fatalities is now extremely low.

Supposedly this also means another argument for the impossibility of gaining any 'natural herd immunity'.

But generally, not very uplifting news for those of us who hope for a quick return to just the risk picture of 'the old days'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 01:55:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 05, 2021, 12:28:16 PM
3) think of it now rather as an ordinary flu, not that much of a disaster any longer; psychologically we're also much more used to flus as a re-occurring phenomenon 4) moreover: epidemics tend to die out after 2-5 years, an expert says. This might be the case here too.

Those who dared to suggest that have been lambasted as ignorant and anti-science until quite recently. Today the stance is promoted by state scientific authorities. How very interesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 06, 2021, 02:05:36 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 01:55:22 AM
Those who dared to suggest that have been lambasted as ignorant and anti-science until quite recently. Today the stance is promoted by state scientific authorities. How very interesting.

Though the future epidemiological situation of the virus might resemble that of influenza, it's health impact is definitely not.

The other day a met young, healthy, sporty woman in her late 20s who has had COVID, contracted at a party with friends.
Most of them got infected. Now she has trouble walking steadily, because her legs are shaking.... ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 03:48:39 AM
Quote from: Que on August 06, 2021, 02:05:36 AM
Though the future epidemiological situation of the virus might resemble that of influenza, it's health impact is definitely not.

The other day a met young, healthy, sporty woman in her late 20s who has had COVID, contracted at a party with friends.
Most of them got infected. Now she has trouble walking steadily, because her legs are shaking.... ???

According to the CDC website (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/symptoms.htm (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/symptoms.htm))

flu symptoms in adults may include severe weakness or unsteadiness.

And on the same anecdotal level, my father-in-law has two comorbidities, both life-threatening, both in advanced stages. He had asymptomatic Covid --- actually, had it not been for the antibodies test, we wouldn't even have known he had it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 06, 2021, 03:57:41 AM
Quote from: Que on August 06, 2021, 02:05:36 AMThe other day a met young, healthy, sporty woman in her late 20s who has had COVID, contracted at a party with friends.
Most of them got infected. Now she has trouble walking steadily, because her legs are shaking.... ???

How long ago did she contract it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 06, 2021, 04:20:20 AM
There was a lot of uncertainty and fear about this new disease and its effects when it came up, and we're making progress in analyzing it, but that work is still going on. I remember reading just a couple of months into the events, that some experts expected between 5 and 22 million fatalities from the virus, plus a breakdown in Western health sectors, and thinking that it seemed astronomical, compared to the rather minute, actual numbers back then. Yet we're now at 4.3 mio fatalities world-wide. This in the light of the vaccine work that has been unexpectedly quick, and is starting to reduce the number of dead. The Spanish Flu, occurring when science was poorer, cost 50 mio dead, or 10% of the infected. There's no doubt that political or scientific apathy towards Corona would have resulted in many more fatalities and health sector problems.

Obviously, some countries and regions have fared better than others in dealing with the virus, including treatment options. Some have been severely hit, and their health sectors overburdened. A good deal are able to suggest that the worst as regards fatalities is probably over, provided that mutations don't get worse. But also, investigations for example concerning the apparently low fatality rates in Africa now suggest that they're probably the result of a poor health sector and registration in many places, the actual numbers being much higher. The same was probably the case for Russia too, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 06, 2021, 05:21:39 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 06, 2021, 03:57:41 AM
How long ago did she contract it?

She fell ill a month ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 05:40:59 AM
Quote from: Que on August 06, 2021, 02:05:36 AM
Though the future epidemiological situation of the virus might resemble that of influenza, it's health impact is definitely not.

The other day a met young, healthy, sporty woman in her late 20s who has had COVID, contracted at a party with friends.
Most of them got infected. Now she has trouble walking steadily, because her legs are shaking.... ???

Horrible experience for her. I think this sort of thing can happen with all viral diseases, including flu and gastroentgeritis (which I think is a better analogy to covid than flu in fact, because of IBS being a long form.)

Whether long forms are more likely or more serious with covid, and whether the vaccines help, is anyone's guess.


(Que -- do you think there's any chance that Holland will let me in without quarantine? I see that France will now, but I really want to go to Holland! Josquin calls.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 06, 2021, 08:14:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 05:40:59 AM
Horrible experience for her. I think this sort of thing can happen with all viral diseases, including flu and gastroentgeritis (which I think is a better analogy to covid than flu in fact, because of IBS being a long form.)

Whether long forms are more likely or more serious with covid, and whether the vaccines help, is anyone's guess.

In a typical year flu kills somewhere around 30,000 people in the U.S., with no social distancing measures and a generally lax attitude about coming to work when sick, etc. Covid killed about 500,000 people in the U.S. in a year, with unprecentended (but inconsistent) social distancing and protective measures. There is no comparison. And "long covid" in people who had initially mild or asymptomatic cases is a big unknown. How long is long? A year, or forever?

It's going to become endemic. The best hope is that a fully vaccinated population benefit from dramatically reduced incidence of severe disease, and that the vaccine also suppresses "long covid." That's unknown. (I've seen some reports that people with long covid felt improvement after being vaccinated, but that is anecdotal and doesn't particularly make sense. If covid is already in their system the vaccine is supposedly superfluous.)

The valid issue about the short timeline of vaccine testing is not safety, but the fact that the long term efficiency of the vaccine is almost completely unknown. Given the severity of the public health issue, going ahead with a largely vaccine which had only been tested for shot-term effectiveness was justified.

I think we need a world with a lot less travel. Easy for me to say, since I will never travel again, myself, Covid or no Covid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 09:39:59 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 06, 2021, 08:14:36 AM
In a typical year flu kills somewhere around 30,000 people in the U.S., with no social distancing measures and a generally lax attitude about coming to work when sick, etc. Covid killed about 500,000 people in the U.S. in a year, with unprecentended (but inconsistent) social distancing and protective measures.

Sure, but my thinking whether in a vaccinated population COVID and flu are comparable.


Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 06, 2021, 08:14:36 AM


I think we need a world with a lot less travel. Easy for me to say, since I will never travel again, myself, Covid or no Covid.

A lot depends here on what travel means. You're in the US -- do we need a world where people can't travel so freely from New York to LA? Or just a world where people can't travel so freely from Madrid to Athens, or Egypt to Capetown?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 06, 2021, 09:46:29 AM
In this ever-evolving subject, CNN now tells that US intelligence has obtained samples of various virus samples from the Wuhan laboratory, trying to establish the origins of it, and including whether the virus could actually be a laboratory or scientific experiment that got out of hand.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/05/politics/covid-origins-genetic-data-wuhan-lab/index.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:51:58 AM
The Black Death occured when travel as we know it was virtually unkown. It took the lives of at least 75 mio people, some estimates even giving the frightening number of 200 mio people --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

The "Spanish" Flu --- btw, if a flu that didn't originated in Spain is called Spanish, what's wrong with calling Chinese a "flu" which did originate in China? --- claimed the lives of between 17 and 100 mio lives --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

I think we need a world with a lot less irrational fear of death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:53:56 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 06, 2021, 09:46:29 AM
In this ever-evolving subject, CNN now tells that US intelligence has obtained samples of various virus samples from the Wuhan laboratory, trying to establish the origins of it, and including whether the virus could actually be a laboratory or scientific experiment that got out of hand.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/05/politics/covid-origins-genetic-data-wuhan-lab/index.html

Sweet!

Just take a look at this very thread from a year ago and see what treatment people got, who dared to even contemplate, let alone suggest, that the virus could actually be a laboratory or scientific experiment that got out of hand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 09:55:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:51:58 AM
The Black Death occured when travel as we know it was virtually unkown. It took the lives of at least 75 mio people, some estimates even giving the frightening number of 200 mio people --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

The "Spanish" Flu --- btw, if a flu that didn't originated in Spain is called Spanish, what's wrong with calling Chinese a "flu" which did originate in China? --- claimed the lives of between 17 and 100 mio lives --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

I think we need a world with a lot less irrational fear of death.

Which of these two poems do you prefer?

QuoteDeath, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so;
For those whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow
Die not, poor Death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleep, which but thy pictures be,
Much pleasure; then from thee much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee do go,
Rest of their bones, and soul's delivery.
Thou art slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell,
And poppy or charms can make us sleep as well
And better than thy stroke; why swell'st thou then?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally
And death shall be no more; Death, thou shalt die.


Or


QuoteI work all day, and get half-drunk at night.   
Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare.   
In time the curtain-edges will grow light.   
Till then I see what's really always there:   
Unresting death, a whole day nearer now,   
Making all thought impossible but how   
And where and when I shall myself die.   
Arid interrogation: yet the dread
Of dying, and being dead,
Flashes afresh to hold and horrify.

The mind blanks at the glare. Not in remorse   
—The good not done, the love not given, time   
Torn off unused—nor wretchedly because   
An only life can take so long to climb
Clear of its wrong beginnings, and may never;   
But at the total emptiness for ever,
The sure extinction that we travel to
And shall be lost in always. Not to be here,   
Not to be anywhere,
And soon; nothing more terrible, nothing more true.

This is a special way of being afraid
No trick dispels. Religion used to try,
That vast moth-eaten musical brocade
Created to pretend we never die,
And specious stuff that says No rational being
Can fear a thing it will not feel, not seeing
That this is what we fear—no sight, no sound,   
No touch or taste or smell, nothing to think with,   
Nothing to love or link with,
The anaesthetic from which none come round.

And so it stays just on the edge of vision,   
A small unfocused blur, a standing chill   
That slows each impulse down to indecision.   
Most things may never happen: this one will,   
And realisation of it rages out
In furnace-fear when we are caught without   
People or drink. Courage is no good:
It means not scaring others. Being brave   
Lets no one off the grave.
Death is no different whined at than withstood.

Slowly light strengthens, and the room takes shape.   
It stands plain as a wardrobe, what we know,   
Have always known, know that we can't escape,   
Yet can't accept. One side will have to go.
Meanwhile telephones crouch, getting ready to ring   
In locked-up offices, and all the uncaring
Intricate rented world begins to rouse.
The sky is white as clay, with no sun.
Work has to be done.
Postmen like doctors go from house to house.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:01:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 09:55:07 AM
Which of these two poems do you prefer?

Donne's by a wide margin. Larkin's strikes me as exactly the incoherent ramblings of a "half-drunk at night".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 10:06:08 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:01:59 AM
Donne's by a wide margin. Larkin's strikes me as exactly the incoherent ramblings of a "half-drunk at night".

Donne strikes me as having partook of the opium of the people, poor deluded soul material body. That vast moth-eaten musical brocade / Created to pretend we never die,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:17:09 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 10:06:08 AM
Donne strikes me as having partook of the opium of the people

I'd rather partake of that than of the opium of the intellectuals.

Cf. Romans 1:22 (KJV)  - Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 10:06:08 AM
pretend we never die

But we never die. Do you have conclusive evidence to the contrary?

If you have, please adduce it in PM. I wouldn't like to be accused time and again of trying to derail threads.  ;)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 10:19:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:17:09 AM



If you have, please adduce it in PM. I wouldn't like to be accused time and again of trying to derail threads.  ;)

Sir, (a + b^n)/z = x, hence we die--reply!


https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/old-tricks-never-die
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on August 06, 2021, 10:27:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:51:58 AM
what's wrong with calling Chinese a "flu" which did originate in China?

Covid is not a flu.  A flu is an influenza virus.  Covid is a coronavirus.  They're not even related.  It would be calling a person a fish.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:30:38 AM
Quote from: DavidW on August 06, 2021, 10:27:44 AM
Covid is not a flu.  A flu is an influenza virus.  Covid is a coronavirus.  They're not even related.  It would be calling a person a fish.

You must have missed the quotation marks around both Spanish and flu.  ;D

Anyway, the Spanish Flu is what we call a disease that did not originate in Spain. What then is wrong to call Chinese a disease that originated in China?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 10:43:06 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 10:19:55 AM
Sir, (a + b^n)/z = x, hence we die--reply!


https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/old-tricks-never-die

Here is my reply: if I mathematically prove that 1 = 2, will you believe that we never die?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 11:09:49 AM
Another good poem -- this is probably close to my attitude

QuoteJe crains pas ça tellment la mort de mes entrailles
et la mort de mon nez et celle de mes os
Je crains pas ça tellement moi cette moustiquaille
qu'on baptisa Raymond d'un père dit Queneau

Je crains pas tellment où va la bouquinaille
les quais les cabinets la poussière et l'ennui
Je crains pas ça tellement moi qui tant écrivaille
et distille la mort en quelques poésies

Je crains pas ça tellment La nuit se coule douce
entre les bords teigneux des paupières des morts
Elle est douce la nuit caresse d'une rousse
le miel des méridiens des pôles sud et nord

Je crains pas cette nuit Je crains pas le sommeil
absolu Ça doit être aussi lourd que le plomb
aussi sec que la lave aussi noir que le ciel
aussi sourd qu'un mendiant bêlant au coin d'un pont

Je crains bien le malheur le deuil et la souffrance
et l'angoisse et la guigne et l'excès de l'absence
Je crains l'abîme obèse où gît la maladie
et le temps et l'espace et les torts de l'esprit

Mais je crains pas tellment ce lugubre imbécile
qui viendra me cueillir au bout de son curdent
lorsque vaincu j'aurai d'un œil vague et placide
cédé tout mon courage aux rongeurs du présent

Un jour je chanterai Ulysse ou bien Achille
Énée ou bien Didon Quichotte ou bien Pança
Un jour je chanterai le bonheur des tranquilles
les plaisirs de la pêche ou la paix des villas

Aujourd'hui bien lassé par l'heure qui s'enroule
tournant comme un bourrin tout autour du cadran
permettez mille excuz à ce crâne - une boule -
de susurrer plaintif la chanson du néant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 11:31:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 11:09:49 AM
Another good poem -- this is probably close to my attitude

I don't share the attitude but it's very well written.

Now, this is something I fully endorse --- if you can read Spanish you''ll know what I mean.


Canción de la vida profunda

El hombre es una cosa vana, variable y ondeante... - Montaigne

Hay días en que somos tan móviles, tan móviles,
como las leves briznas al viento y al azar.
Tal vez bajo otro cielo la Gloria nos sonríe.
La vida es clara, undívaga, y abierta como un mar.

Y hay días en que somos tan fértiles, tan fértiles,
como en abril el campo, que tiembla de pasión:
bajo el influjo próvido de espirituales lluvias,
el alma está brotando florestas de ilusión.

Y hay días en que somos tan sórdidos, tan sórdidos,
como la entraña obscura de oscuro pedernal:
la noche nos sorprende, con sus profusas lámparas,
en rútiles monedas tasando el Bien y el Mal.

Y hay días en que somos tan plácidos, tan plácidos...
(¡niñez en el crepúsculo! ¡Lagunas de zafir!)
que un verso, un trino, un monte, un pájaro que cruza,
y hasta las propias penas nos hacen sonreír.

Y hay días en que somos tan lúbricos, tan lúbricos,
que nos depara en vano su carne la mujer:
tras de ceñir un talle y acariciar un seno,
la redondez de un fruto nos vuelve a estremecer.

Y hay días en que somos tan lúgubres, tan lúgubres,
como en las noches lúgubres el llanto del pinar.
El alma gime entonces bajo el dolor del mundo,
y acaso ni Dios mismo nos puede consolar.

Mas hay también ¡Oh Tierra! un día... un día... un día...
en que levamos anclas para jamás volver...
Un día en que discurren vientos ineluctables
¡un día en que ya nadie nos puede retener!


by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porfirio_Barba-Jacob (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porfirio_Barba-Jacob)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 11:38:35 AM
Also this:

Letanía de nuestro señor Don Quijote

Rey de los hidalgos, señor de los tristes,
que de fuerza alientas y de ensueños vistes,
coronado de áureo yelmo de ilusión;
que nadie ha podido vencer todavía,
por la adarga al brazo, toda fantasía,
y la lanza en ristre, toda corazón.

Noble peregrino de los peregrinos,
que santificaste todos los caminos
con el paso augusto de tu heroicidad,
contra las certezas, contra las conciencias
y contra las leyes y contra las ciencias,
contra la mentira, contra la verdad...

¡Caballero errante de los caballeros,
varón de varones, príncipe de fieros,
par entre los pares, maestro, salud!
¡Salud, porque juzgo que hoy muy poca tienes,
entre los aplausos o entre los desdenes,
y entre las coronas y los parabienes
y las tonterías de la multitud!

¡Tú, para quien pocas fueron las victorias
antiguas y para quien clásicas glorias
serían apenas de ley y razón,
soportas elogios, memorias, discursos,
resistes certámenes, tarjetas, concursos,
y, teniendo a Orfeo, tienes a orfeón!

Escucha, divino Rolando del sueño,
a un enamorado de tu Clavileño,
y cuyo Pegaso relincha hacia ti;
escucha los versos de estas letanías,
hechas con las cosas de todos los días
y con otras que en lo misterioso vi.

¡Ruega por nosotros, hambrientos de vida,
con el alma a tientas, con la fe perdida,
llenos de congojas y faltos de sol,
por advenedizas almas de manga ancha,
que ridiculizan el ser de la Mancha,
el ser generoso y el ser español!

¡Ruega por nosotros, que necesitamos
las mágicas rosas, los sublimes ramos
de laurel Pro nobis ora, gran señor.
¡Tiembla la floresta de laurel del mundo,
y antes que tu hermano vago, Segismundo,
el pálido Hamlet te ofrece una flor!

Ruega generoso, piadoso, orgulloso;
ruega casto, puro, celeste, animoso;
por nos intercede, suplica por nos,
pues casi ya estamos sin savia, sin brote,
sin alma, sin vida, sin luz, sin Quijote,
sin piel y sin alas, sin Sancho y sin Dios.

De tantas tristezas, de dolores tantos
de los superhombres de Nietzsche, de cantos
áfonos, recetas que firma un doctor,
de las epidemias, de horribles blasfemias
de las Academias,
¡líbranos, Señor!

De rudos malsines,
falsos paladines,
y espíritus finos y blandos y ruines,
del hampa que sacia
su canallocracia
con burlar la gloria, la vida, el honor,
del puñal con gracia,
¡líbranos, Señor!

Noble peregrino de los peregrinos,
que santificaste todos los caminos,
con el paso augusto de tu heroicidad,
contra las certezas, contra las conciencias
y contra las leyes y contra las ciencias,
contra la mentira, contra la verdad...

¡Ora por nosotros, señor de los tristes
que de fuerza alientas y de ensueños vistes,
coronado de áureo yelmo de ilusión!
¡que nadie ha podido vencer todavía,
por la adarga al brazo, toda fantasía,
y la lanza en ristre, toda corazón!


by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rub%C3%A9n_Dar%C3%ADo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rub%C3%A9n_Dar%C3%ADo)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 11:39:44 AM
My last two posts dedicated to Rafael (ritter), if he ever reads this thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 06, 2021, 05:30:06 PM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 01:55:22 AM
3) think of it now rather as an ordinary flu, not that much of a disaster any longer; psychologically we're also much more used to flus as a re-occurring phenomenon 4) moreover: epidemics tend to die out after 2-5 years, an expert says. This might be the case here too.


Those who dared to suggest that have been lambasted as ignorant and anti-science until quite recently. Today the stance is promoted by state scientific authorities. How very interesting.

I'm with you on this one. The issue will be convincing the politicians which doesn't appear to be too much of a problem for the UK. They are on the right path to treating ths as endemic. It will be a lot harder here in OZ.

What might enlighten the issue for many is how the daily statistics are published. Here in QLD the government (and therefore the media) will list all infections, even those in MIQ. This keeps the fear factor going for the general public - especially the 'sheeple'. What I want to know is how many of the infected are seriously ill and/or in hospital because it will only be a very small percentage of the total infections.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 06, 2021, 05:39:58 PM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:51:58 AM
The Black Death occured when travel as we know it was virtually unkown. It took the lives of at least 75 mio people, some estimates even giving the frightening number of 200 mio people --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

The "Spanish" Flu --- btw, if a flu that didn't originated in Spain is called Spanish, what's wrong with calling Chinese a "flu" which did originate in China? --- claimed the lives of between 17 and 100 mio lives --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

I think we need a world with a lot less irrational fear of death.

The similarities between the "Spanish Flu" and Covid as pandemics are many except in one factor - the death toll. At the start, neither virus had a vaccine and if you compare figures for the first year of both (which is pre Covid vaccine) as Florestan has indicated, the flu makes Covid look like a common cold. The other interesting thing is back in 1918 - 1920, lockdowns and mask wearing where mandatory in Australia but did very little to stop the spread of the virus. As there is a common method of transmission to both I doubt the efficacy of mask wearing and isolating people in high rise buildings in congested population centres is sheer madness - but it does save money.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 06, 2021, 09:58:19 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 06, 2021, 05:30:06 PM
I'm with you on this one. The issue will be convincing the politicians which doesn't appear to be too much of a problem for the UK. They are on the right path to treating ths as endemic. It will be a lot harder here in OZ.

What might enlighten the issue for many is how the daily statistics are published. Here in QLD the government (and therefore the media) will list all infections, even those in MIQ. This keeps the fear factor going for the general public - especially the 'sheeple'. What I want to know is how many of the infected are seriously ill and/or in hospital because it will only be a very small percentage of the total infections.

It took 20 seconds to find the relevant info  and a lot else, via a government website. It was the first hit when searching for 'queensland hospitalized corona'. So it's not that the info is being hidden, which is the impression one could get when reading your post. Actually, it's extremely detailed. However, some of your media might be ommitting or pointing to certain details, I can't tell.

There were 13 new daily cases, 144 active cases, 1909 totally, with 7 fatalities totally. 70 currently hospitalized and just 1 in ICU.

It seems that you have a lot of children (39 a few days ago at Gold Coast University hospital) hospitalized for observation with Delta, another source is telling. (9news.com.au).

The info at Covidlive.com.au confirms, that 70 is indeed the number of currently hospitalized, not just an accumulated total until now, so you seem to have a relatively high percentage of identified cases being also hospitalized. Maybe this is because of a good care system, and also a lot of the milder cases remain unreported - the state has 5.2 mio inhabitants, but 3.6 mio tests have been carried through (for example, we are 5.8 mio, but with 39 mio tests, and 322,000 cases).

This is just based on a few minutes of quick research by a foreigner, however. An important number would be the ICUs in QLD theoretically available, but I'm not going to look for it now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 06, 2021, 10:57:48 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 06, 2021, 09:58:19 PM
It took 20 seconds to find the relevant info  and a lot else, via a government website. It was the first hit when searching for 'queensland hospitalized corona'. So it's not that the info is being hidden, which is the impression one could get when reading your post. Actually, it's extremely detailed. However, some of your media might be ommitting or pointing to certain details, I can't tell.

There were 13 new daily cases, 144 active cases, 1909 totally, with 7 fatalities totally. 70 currently hospitalized and just 1 in ICU.

It seems that you have a lot of children (39 a few days ago at Gold Coast University hospital) hospitalized for observation with Delta, another source is telling. (9news.com.au).

The info at Covidlive.com.au confirms, that 70 is indeed the number of currently hospitalized, not just an accumulated total until now, so you seem to have a relatively high percentage of identified cases being also hospitalized. Maybe this is because of a good care system, and also a lot of the milder cases remain unreported - the state has 5.2 mio inhabitants, but 3.6 mio tests have been carried through (for example, we are 5.8 mio, but with 39 mio tests, and 322,000 cases).

This is just based on a few minutes of quick research by a foreigner, however. An important number would be the ICUs in QLD theoretically available, but I'm not going to look for it now.

Yes we do have a great health system and yes I rely on the Qld government website for the actual facts.

However, some of your media might be ommitting or pointing to certain details,

This is the issue for me. Just now driving back from the bottle store the news on my car radio reported 13 new cases with the addendum that only one was a case of local transmission and was linked to cluster in Brisbane. In other words they've got that sorted. The radio news, because of limited time, tends to be more inclusive and less sensationalist.

The children mentioned in for observation and are possibly there because they have comorbidities but that's not stated. The number seems rather high and as it's not from the Govt website is not necessarily accurate.

A decision on our current lockdown will be made tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 07, 2021, 07:19:06 AM
700,000 bikers expected to show up at the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally in South Dakota.  Rally started today.  From the tiny bit of news that I've caught via t.v., it didn't sound like many of the participants were thought to be vaccinated (saw a reporter interviewing a few of the bikers)?  That's a lot of people in one small town.  Fingers crossed that it won't be a super spreader event.  :(

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/sturgis-bike-rally-revs-back-bigger-virus-variant-79272124

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 07, 2021, 07:22:56 AM
Ouch, that's an incredible gathering, didn't know that such huge biker meetings existed at all. Hopefully it will be less about dense crowds, than just meeting a bunch of like-minded people, in the open air. But I guess there's normally a good deal of alcohol etc. involved too, besides a macho-attitude. Authorities limiting the number of participants in a public event seems apparently out of the question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 07, 2021, 07:30:34 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 07, 2021, 07:22:56 AM
Authorities limiting the number of participants in a public event seems apparently out of the question.

Ordinary people* are just fed up with authorities telling them how they should live their lives, what they should do and what they shouldn't... because, as a darling of the auhtorities onces said, in the long run we are all dead...

*in some political and social circles aka as deplorables
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 07, 2021, 07:34:03 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 07, 2021, 07:30:34 AM
Ordinary people* are just fed up with authorities telling them how they should live their lives, what they should do and what they shouldn't... because, as a darling of the auhtorities onces said, in the long run we are all dead...

*in some political and social circles aka as deplorables

Yes, stereotypes can be very convenient.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 07, 2021, 07:55:40 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 07, 2021, 07:34:03 AM

Yes, stereotypes can be very convenient.

Totally agreed.

For the record, I am not an anti-vaxer (I got my 8yo son vaccinated with all the mandatory vaccines here in Romania, plus a few optional ones) and I don't subscribe to the theory that Covid-19 is a fiction. But neither do I subscribe to the blind faith in "scientific authorities" that has been prevalent since the advent of this bloody effing pandemic. Science can be, and is, just as easily politicized as any other human endeavour --- it suffices to recall the shameful and downright criminal behaviour of the WHO, which downplayed the gravity of this pandemic for as long as it was politically convenient to do it --- until they had no other option than to admit they were wrong, literally dead wrong.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 07, 2021, 08:52:39 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 07, 2021, 07:30:34 AM
Ordinary people* are just fed up with authorities telling them how they should live their lives, what they should do and what they shouldn't... because, as a darling of the auhtorities onces said, in the long run we are all dead...

*in some political and social circles aka as deplorables

I wouldn't underestimate the sheepishness of ordinary people in Western Europe. Even in France, that country of râleurs, it always comes to nothing after they've let off a bit of steam.

IMO the people have done a tacit deal with the politicians and the forces of capital. In return for cheap commodities they'll let them do anything, anything. China holds the strings of the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on August 07, 2021, 10:16:20 AM
It will definitely be a superspreader event, but among folks who've chosen to be there as a middle finger to prudent people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 07, 2021, 10:33:12 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:51:58 AM
The "Spanish" Flu --- btw, if a flu that didn't originated in Spain is called Spanish, what's wrong with calling Chinese a "flu" which did originate in China? --- claimed the lives of between 17 and 100 mio lives --- thus making Covid-19 look like a stroll in the park.

The problem is the same in both cases: bigotry plus scapegoatism.

It's no "stroll in the park" for the Americans mourning 612K deaths.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 07, 2021, 10:34:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 09:53:56 AM
Sweet!

Just take a look at this very thread from a year ago and see what treatment people got, who dared to even contemplate, let alone suggest, that the virus could actually be a laboratory or scientific experiment that got out of hand.

Conspiracy theory mongers earn their scorn honestly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 07, 2021, 10:39:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 07, 2021, 07:30:34 AM
Ordinary people* are just fed up with authorities telling them how they should live their lives, what they should do and what they shouldn't... because, as a darling of the auhtorities onces said, in the long run we are all dead...

Why go to the doctor? in the long run we are all dead...

Why do I bother going to therapy where I ecpend considerable effort trying to restore use of my left hand? in the long run we are all dead...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 07, 2021, 11:08:23 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 07, 2021, 10:39:44 AM
Why go to the doctor? in the long run we are all dead...

Why do I bother going to therapy where I ecpend considerable effort trying to restore use of my left hand? in the long run we are all dead...

Because we fear the gross chasm where sickness lies.

Quote from: Mandryka on August 06, 2021, 11:09:49 AM
Je crains l'abîme obèse où gît la maladie


(Better translation anyone?)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on August 07, 2021, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: Florestan on August 06, 2021, 11:39:44 AM
My last two posts dedicated to Rafael (ritter), if he ever reads this thread.
Many thanks, Andrei! I feel honoured...(I occasionally read this thread  ;)).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 07, 2021, 06:45:11 PM
The local Walmart is closed for "sanitization," apparently after a large number of employees tested positive for Covid-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 08, 2021, 04:04:14 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 07, 2021, 06:45:11 PM
The local Walmart is closed for "sanitization," apparently after a large number of employees tested positive for Covid-19.
Oh, boy!

I do wonder though how much those sanitation efforts help re slowing down/preventing transmission of Covid?  If nothing else though, cleaning out any air ducts, vents, etc. would be good for the general health of the workers and customers.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 08, 2021, 04:42:16 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 08, 2021, 04:04:14 AM
Oh, boy!

I do wonder though how much those sanitation efforts help re slowing down/preventing transmission of Covid?  If nothing else though, cleaning out any air ducts, vents, etc. would be good for the general health of the workers and customers.

PD

I doubt the cleaning does much. Perhaps they are taking the opportunity to test all employees. I also read that Walmart will now require all employees to be vaccinated. Perhaps they are making a drive to vaccinate. Ironically, vaccines are given on a walk-in basis at the location.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 08, 2021, 04:59:50 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 08, 2021, 04:42:16 AM
I doubt the cleaning does much. Perhaps they are taking the opportunity to test all employees. I also read that Walmart will now require all employees to be vaccinated. Perhaps they are making a drive to vaccinate. Ironically, vaccines are given on a walk-in basis at the location.
That would be the biggest of help (getting all of the employees that can be vaccinated, vaccinated).

Wonder how things are going at the motorcycle rally in South Dakota?  I later heard that the town bought a bundle of masks to hand out for anyone wanting one, have set up lots of sanitation stations around town, and are also willing to drop off rapid test kits for anyone who would like one.  Wonder how well too that they will be able to alert people if (more likely when) someone does test positive for Covid?   :-\

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 08, 2021, 02:23:31 PM
The UK Times account is more complete, but it has a paywall.


https://metro.co.uk/2021/08/05/anti-vaxxer-dies-days-after-saying-covid-is-nothing-to-be-afraid-of-15043153/ (https://metro.co.uk/2021/08/05/anti-vaxxer-dies-days-after-saying-covid-is-nothing-to-be-afraid-of-15043153/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 08, 2021, 03:28:47 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 08, 2021, 04:59:50 AMWonder how things are going at the motorcycle rally in South Dakota?  I later heard that the town bought a bundle of masks to hand out for anyone wanting one, have set up lots of sanitation stations around town, and are also willing to drop off rapid test kits for anyone who would like one.  Wonder how well too that they will be able to alert people if (more likely when) someone does test positive for Covid?   :-\

PD

Yes, they held the rally last year as well and later epidemiologists connected a huge number of cases in the region to spreading at the event.

It turns out that years ago, in 2006, I was doing a road trip from he west coast to the east cost, and was on interstate 90, which goes through Sturgis. I was surprised to see a huge number of motorcycles on the road and when I stopped to get lunch at a Macdonalds the parking lot was full of them. Had no idea about the festival at that time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 01:45:58 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 07, 2021, 10:34:49 AM
Conspiracy theory mongers earn their scorn honestly.

But that's precisely the point, Karl: what last year was scorned as conspiracy theory is today a hypothesis seriously considered and investigated by the US intelligence. From the article: "CNN reported last month that senior Biden administration officials overseeing the 90-day review now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild -- a dramatic shift from a year ago, when Democrats publicly downplayed the so-called lab leak theory."

I guess this is a perfect illustration of the old adage si duo dicunt idem, non est idem, on multiple levels. When the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild was suggested by senior Trump adnministration officials it was scorned as conspiracy theory and scapegoatism; now that the same theory is espused by senior Biden administration officials, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if they say something, then it must be wrong; if we say the same thing, then it might be true. Also, when the theory was believed by people not in any position of state authority, they were scorned as just ignorant conspiracy theorists or mad / attention-seeking scientists; now that that the theory is proposed by people in positions of state authority, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if the people say something, then it must be wrong; if the State says the same thing, then it might be true. Indeed, if two say the same, it's not the same.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 01:53:47 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 07, 2021, 10:39:44 AM
Why do I bother going to therapy where I ecpend considerable effort trying to restore use of my left hand?

For the same reason that those people go to to the motorbike rally: both you and they try to get back to normal life and do what you / they love (composing and playing the clarinet, in your case, motorbiking and socializing with their kind, in their case).

I don't know about them but you made impressive progress, honestly. Someone who didn't know your condition wouldn't guess it from your posts. Keep up the good job, wishing you speedy and complete recovery. May the day you'll be playing the clarinet again come quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 09, 2021, 03:24:46 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 01:45:58 AM
But that's precisely the point, Karl: what last year was scorned as conspiracy theory is today a hypothesis seriously considered and investigated by the US intelligence. From the article: "CNN reported last month that senior Biden administration officials overseeing the 90-day review now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild -- a dramatic shift from a year ago, when Democrats publicly downplayed the so-called lab leak theory."

I guess this is a perfect illustration of the old adage si duo dicunt idem, non est idem, on multiple levels. When the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild was suggested by senior Trump adnministration officials it was scorned as conspiracy theory and scapegoatism; now that the same theory is espused by senior Biden administration officials, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if they say something, then it must be wrong; if we say the same thing, then it might be true. Also, when the theory was believed by people not in any position of state authority, they were scorned as just ignorant conspiracy theorists or mad / attention-seeking scientists; now that that the theory is proposed by people in positions of state authority, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if the people say something, then it must be wrong; if the State says the same thing, then it might be true. Indeed, if two say the same, it's not the same.

Speaking only for myself, the reason I give the lab-leak theory a little more credence today than last year has nothing to do with the fact that the new administration is giving it more credence, but rather that scientists are (and in particular, Francis Collins), and that the reasons for being confident in a natural zoonotic origin have been somewhat, if not discredited, then at least shown to be roughly equally plausible as those favoring accidental release from the Wuhan lab.

I suspect the argument is going to continue for some time, and the issue will probably never be definitively settled. To be sure, barring its discovery among materials inside the lab, I don't see any way to distinguish with confidence a purely zoonotic origin among Chinese farmers from a purely zoonotic origin among Chinese virologists - i.e. the theory that the scientists contracted the virus whilst collecting samples in bat caves, as opposed to after conducting gain-of-function experiments on a virus found in those samples.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 09, 2021, 03:54:13 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 08, 2021, 03:28:47 PM
Yes, they held the rally last year as well and later epidemiologists connected a huge number of cases in the region to spreading at the event.

It turns out that years ago, in 2006, I was doing a road trip from he west coast to the east cost, and was on interstate 90, which goes through Sturgis. I was surprised to see a huge number of motorcycles on the road and when I stopped to get lunch at a Macdonalds the parking lot was full of them. Had no idea about the festival at that time.
Sorry to hear that they still held it last year.  :(

Reading about it in the news reminded me that some years ago (long before Covid-19), I used to go to a doctor who loved riding motorcycles.  We got into yakking about our summers and she told me that she had gone to this festival.  From what I recall, she had enjoyed the experience.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 09, 2021, 04:23:10 AM
Quote from: krummholz on August 09, 2021, 03:24:46 AM
Speaking only for myself, the reason I give the lab-leak theory a little more credence today than last year has nothing to do with the fact that the new administration is giving it more credence, but rather that scientists are (and in particular, Francis Collins), and that the reasons for being confident in a natural zoonotic origin have been somewhat, if not discredited, then at least shown to be roughly equally plausible as those favoring accidental release from the Wuhan lab.

I suspect the argument is going to continue for some time, and the issue will probably never be definitively settled. To be sure, barring its discovery among materials inside the lab, I don't see any way to distinguish with confidence a purely zoonotic origin among Chinese farmers from a purely zoonotic origin among Chinese virologists - i.e. the theory that the scientists contracted the virus whilst collecting samples in bat caves, as opposed to after conducting gain-of-function experiments on a virus found in those samples.

I generally agree.

It seems to me that the messaging from people who have both the scientific expertise and presumably have access to intelligence briefings (people like Anthony Fauci) has been pretty consistent. Transfer from an animal host to humans in the environment is the obvious explanation (it has happened many times in the past). Leak from the virus institute can't be ruled out, but there is no concrete evidence either way and it appears to be the far less likely scenario. (There are a few instances in the past when a person working in a research laboratory got infected and carried the infection out.) Early on scientists were reluctant to give credence to the possibility that the virus came from the institute because they didn't want to seem to support the politically motivated conspiracy theories coming from the Trump Administration.

In any case, purely scientific studies have concluded that the Covid-19 virus came from natural evolution (rather than deliberate manipulation).

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

The conclusion here is that scientists have a bag of tricks for manipulating viruses and the genome of the novel coronavirus does not show the hallmarks of any of these tricks. It shows statistical characteristics that one might expect from natural evolution. To believe that Chinese scientists created this virus deliberately is to accept that the Chinese scientist have scientific and technical expertise vastly superior to western scientists.

The only real issue is whether the institute was negligent in allowing a virus they had collected from the wild infect a worker. The idea that it was part of a bioweapons project is pretty absurd, considering that a coronavirus like the Covid-19 virus is the worst imaginable candidate for a bioweapon. An ideal bioweapon is extremely lethal and not very contagious. You want to dose your enemy, then they all die, and the pathogen does not spread further. Something like Anthrax. You don't want to dose your enemy, only 1% of them die, then the virus spreads back to you and 1% of your people die too.

There are frequency implications that the secrecy surrounding the Wuhan outbreak is proof of wrongdoing. Secrecy surrounds everything the government does in China. That is a characteristic of totalitarian governments. Certainly the local authorities were intent on concealing the severity of the outbreak from the population and the national authorities. That was an unforgivable, stupid action that cost many lives. Chinese scientists published the full genomic sequence of the Covid-19 virus on January 10, 2020, a day before the first confirmed death, and 2 weeks before transport from Wuhan was locked down by the national government. The scale of the outbreak was concealed (until the lockdown of Wuhan on January 23, 2020 made it obvious how serious the national government was taking it). Knowledge about the nature of the disease was shared as soon as it was available.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/chinese-researchers-reveal-draft-genome-virus-implicated-wuhan-pneumonia-outbreak


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 09, 2021, 04:39:48 AM
Very interesting, Spotted Horses. With every day bringing news and anecdotes we (at least I) tend to forget about the original context and chain of events.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 09, 2021, 04:57:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 01:45:58 AM
But that's precisely the point, Karl: what last year was scorned as conspiracy theory is today a hypothesis seriously considered and investigated by the US intelligence. From the article: "CNN reported last month that senior Biden administration officials overseeing the 90-day review now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild -- a dramatic shift from a year ago, when Democrats publicly downplayed the so-called lab leak theory."

I guess this is a perfect illustration of the old adage si duo dicunt idem, non est idem, on multiple levels. When the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild was suggested by senior Trump adnministration officials it was scorned as conspiracy theory and scapegoatism; now that the same theory is espused by senior Biden administration officials, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if they say something, then it must be wrong; if we say the same thing, then it might be true. Also, when the theory was believed by people not in any position of state authority, they were scorned as just ignorant conspiracy theorists or mad / attention-seeking scientists; now that that the theory is proposed by people in positions of state authority, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if the people say something, then it must be wrong; if the State says the same thing, then it might be true. Indeed, if two say the same, it's not the same.

The hypothesis may be the same, the behavior is not. The purpose of the US Intelligence and the Biden administration is to find out the fact of the matter, and to save lives.

Trump's purpose was always to flood the zone with shit. Nor was he ever in even the least interested in saving any life other than his own. This was a "President" whose "work" in addressing a public health crisis which has now claimed 600K+ American lives was to play golf more than any US President in history, and to dance to disco music at his own superspreader rallies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 09, 2021, 05:01:23 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 09, 2021, 04:23:10 AM

There are frequency implications that the secrecy surrounding the Wuhan outbreak is proof of wrongdoing.

Indeeed. And even without your sequel, Educated adults understand this to be pure fallacy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 09, 2021, 05:36:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 09, 2021, 03:54:13 AM
Sorry to hear that they still held it last year.  :(

Reading about it in the news reminded me that some years ago (long before Covid-19), I used to go to a doctor who loved riding motorcycles.  We got into yakking about our summers and she told me that she had gone to this festival.  From what I recall, she had enjoyed the experience.

PD

Speaking of pleasant experiences with bikers, I once stayed at a camp site on the shore of a Swedish lake, near the town of Jönköping, run by mainly senior motorbike-interested people of both sexes for their visiting associates and next to their club-house, and it was calm and enjoyable (not a busy time there either). Obviously, it had nothing to do with say biker gangs. It is still there, I see https://www.svenskalag.se/Vmck/sida/13651/camp-vmck I'm sure you have plenty of such stuff in the US too, like in almost all countries.

We also have a traditional gathering for bikers here, at the annual opening of the 'Bakken' amusement park north of Copenhagen, where there'll be a cortege up to the place from the city center, with up to 7,000 bikes, spread out in groups. In 2020, it was cancelled due to Corona, in 2021 it was postponed one month, to bring it in accordance with the general opening up in society. Again, it is not a gang-related event, but combined with other families visiting the opening, and obviously more modest and short-lasting, than 700,000 in days of gatherings at a place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 09, 2021, 06:35:58 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 09, 2021, 05:36:09 AM
Speaking of pleasant experiences with bikers, I once stayed at a camp site on the shore of a Swedish lake, near the town of Jönköping, run by mainly senior motorbike-interested people of both sexes for their visiting associates and next to their club-house, and it was calm and enjoyable (not a busy time there either). Obviously, it had nothing to do with say biker gangs. It is still there, I see https://www.svenskalag.se/Vmck/sida/13651/camp-vmck I'm sure you have plenty of such stuff in the US too, like in almost all countries.

We also have a traditional gathering for bikers here, at the annual opening of the 'Bakken' amusement park north of Copenhagen, where there'll be a cortege up to the place from the city center, with up to 7,000 bikes, spread out in groups. In 2020, it was cancelled due to Corona, in 2021 it was postponed one month, to bring it in accordance with the general opening up in society. Again, it is not a gang-related event, but combined with other families visiting the opening, and obviously more modest and short-lasting, than 700,000 in days of gatherings at a place.
Oh, yeah.  All kinds of people enjoy riding motorcycles.  Out of curiosity, I looked at their website.  Lots of concerts going on (over the course of 10 days) and some different events/competitions (including best mustache/beard).  They have a few live webcams set up in the city, so you can get an idea of what it's like there.  https://www.sturgismotorcyclerally.com/?_ga=2.233388830.1491013976.1628519033-631173795.1628519033

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on August 09, 2021, 08:44:04 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 01:45:58 AM
But that's precisely the point, Karl: what last year was scorned as conspiracy theory is today a hypothesis seriously considered and investigated by the US intelligence. From the article: "CNN reported last month that senior Biden administration officials overseeing the 90-day review now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild -- a dramatic shift from a year ago, when Democrats publicly downplayed the so-called lab leak theory."

I guess this is a perfect illustration of the old adage si duo dicunt idem, non est idem, on multiple levels. When the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild was suggested by senior Trump adnministration officials it was scorned as conspiracy theory and scapegoatism; now that the same theory is espused by senior Biden administration officials, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if they say something, then it must be wrong; if we say the same thing, then it might be true. Also, when the theory was believed by people not in any position of state authority, they were scorned as just ignorant conspiracy theorists or mad / attention-seeking scientists; now that that the theory is proposed by people in positions of state authority, it is suddenly legit and worth investigating --- if the people say something, then it must be wrong; if the State says the same thing, then it might be true. Indeed, if two say the same, it's not the same.
That's why sometimes it's best to go by one's own intuition. There's no political or financial conflicting interests in that.

In other situations, intuition is great because it can save your life (or wallet). I recently watched a video of some guy doing a U-turn right before getting to a cartel checkpoint in Mexico- a normal, oblivious America would have been like, "Oh, gee, a government checkpoint? Guess I'll just show them ID or whatever and gosh darn go on my jolly good way!"  ;D

Lab leak theory never sounded far-fetched at all to me. Wet market theory also didn't sound far-fetched, but there were no signs supporting it, and if it's the official story from the least-trusted government on the planet, why not consider an alternative possibility?

But I could have never anticipated the epic sci-fi drama twist of Fauci and the gain of research thing... we'll see how that plays out. LOL

I'd also say that conspiracy BS like bioweapon theory, or microchips in vaccines sound highly unintuitive to me. There's just too much to argue against why those scenarios would be likely. I'd consider the people that came up with this stuff to be less connected to reality, and moreso aspiring playwrights.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 09, 2021, 09:00:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 09, 2021, 05:36:09 AM
Speaking of pleasant experiences with bikers, I once stayed at a camp site on the shore of a Swedish lake, near the town of Jönköping, run by mainly senior motorbike-interested people of both sexes for their visiting associates and next to their club-house, and it was calm and enjoyable (not a busy time there either). Obviously, it had nothing to do with say biker gangs. It is still there, I see https://www.svenskalag.se/Vmck/sida/13651/camp-vmck (https://www.svenskalag.se/Vmck/sida/13651/camp-vmck) I'm sure you have plenty of such stuff in the US too, like in almost all countries.

We also have a traditional gathering for bikers here, at the annual opening of the 'Bakken' amusement park north of Copenhagen, where there'll be a cortege up to the place from the city center, with up to 7,000 bikes, spread out in groups. In 2020, it was cancelled due to Corona, in 2021 it was postponed one month, to bring it in accordance with the general opening up in society. Again, it is not a gang-related event, but combined with other families visiting the opening, and obviously more modest and short-lasting, than 700,000 in days of gatherings at a place.

There's also an annual bikerfest in nearby Laconia, New Hampshire. The event was scaled back last year, and it was not the superspreader it might hsve been (100 positive tests in its wake) Vaccination was offered at this year's do (https://www.wmur.com/article/covid-19-vaccinations-being-offered-at-motorcycle-week/36706492).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 09, 2021, 09:33:23 AM
Quote from: greg on August 09, 2021, 08:44:04 AM
That's why sometimes it's best to go by one's own intuition. There's no political or financial conflicting interests in that.

Intuition works great when you don't know anything and it doesn't matter to anyone else if you are right or wrong. For other circumstances, there is "information." :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 09, 2021, 09:36:19 AM
Quote from: greg on August 09, 2021, 08:44:04 AM
That's why sometimes it's best to go by one's own intuition. There's no political or financial conflicting interests in that.

If you're trying to backpedal your peddling of conspiracy theory wares as "intuition," I ain't buying it, and I wonder how many sales you'll log among present company.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 10:45:04 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 09, 2021, 04:23:10 AM
Early on scientists were reluctant to give credence to the possibility that the virus came from the institute because they didn't want to seem to support the politically motivated conspiracy theories coming from the Trump Administration.

Iow, they were reluctant to consider a hypothesis, for fear that if it had been proven right it would have supported the politically motivated conspiracy theories coming from the Trump Administration. Bottom line, the search for truth is not about finding the truth plain and simple, searching for truth is about politics and what is politically convenient. Good to know!

QuoteTo believe that Chinese scientists created this virus deliberately is to accept that the Chinese scientist have scientific and technical expertise vastly superior to western scientists.

The lab-leak-theory is one thing; the deliberately-created-and-released-virus theory is another thing; one can consider the former as plausible without subscribing to the latter, although anyone who has extensive first-hand experience of how totalitarianism works would not rule out the latter completely --- more about this below.

QuoteThe idea that it was part of a bioweapons project is pretty absurd, considering that a coronavirus like the Covid-19 virus is the worst imaginable candidate for a bioweapon. An ideal bioweapon is extremely lethal and not very contagious. You want to dose your enemy, then they all die, and the pathogen does not spread further. Something like Anthrax. You don't want to dose your enemy, only 1% of them die, then the virus spreads back to you and 1% of your people die too.

I'd say that a virus which

(a) spreads, and mutates, super fast;
(b) has wreaked havoc in the healthcare systems of the  EU, the USA, Russia, Brazil, India and many other countries, resulting in millions of deaths;
(c) has disrupted the economy, tourism, transportation of the same countries / regions, resulting in millions of affected people and businesses;
(d) has affected negatively the social and political environment of the same countries / regions;
(e) shows no sign of subsiding, on the contrary we are constantly and incessantly warned about it coming back again and again, ever more virulent

could qualify as a quite effective biological weapon

The virus spread from China to the rest of the world, not the other way back around; plus, the Chinese Communist Party has extensive expertise in killing their own people by the millions in order to advance and achieve their goals.

I don't think the virus was deliberately released, but the possibility can't be ruled out completely.

QuoteThere are frequency implications that the secrecy surrounding the Wuhan outbreak is proof of wrongdoing. Secrecy surrounds everything the government does in China. That is a characteristic of totalitarian governments.

Yes --- and precisely for this reason any rational person should in principle distrust, fact-check (if possible) and try to investigate (if possible), everything that the Chinese authorities say, including scientific authorities (anyone who has extensive first-hand experience of how totalitarianism works knows that in such a regime science is completely subordinated to politics, or rather to ideology).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 09, 2021, 10:56:42 AM
I think this is the right thread for this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 09, 2021, 10:58:54 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 09, 2021, 04:57:23 AM
The hypothesis may be the same, the behavior is not. The purpose of the US Intelligence and the Biden administration is to find out the fact of the matter, and to save lives.

Whether the virus originated in the Wuhan lab or in the wild is a question of truth plain and simple. If it was established beyond any reasonable doubt that it was the former, (and that's a big if) it would not save one single life by itself.

A truth is a truth no matter who proclaims it --- and anyone who proclaims a truth is right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 09, 2021, 12:31:39 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 09, 2021, 10:56:42 AM
I think this is the right thread for this.

:laugh: Great sign. We don't really have any like that here, but the local police can do similar tweets-with-a-twist to the public at some occasions, though, to promote some sense of responsibility, towards youngsters etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 10, 2021, 01:26:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 09, 2021, 10:56:42 AM
I think this is the right thread for this.

It's something more appropriate for the grammar grumble thread, actually.  :D

It should read either

Unless you feel that this is an attempt to deprive you of your liberty, stop driving!

or

If you feel that this is an attempt to deprive you of your liberty, then keep driving!

The original formulation makes no sense at all. Not to mention that I don't think a construction like unless...then is correct.. ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 10, 2021, 06:59:43 AM
Bloomberg via The Boston Globe: "The U.K. said Covid-19 accounted for 4% of all deaths in the last week of July, the highest weekly share of all deaths in three months.

The Office for National Statistics counted 11,573 deaths in the week through July 30, 468 of which included the coronavirus as a cause. That's 1,262 above the five-year average.

These figures reflect a progressive loosening of lockdown rules starting in April that resulted in most restrictions being scrapped on July 19. Infections have been rising steadily since, but serious sickness and hospitalizations remain below peak levels last year because of a rapid takeup of vaccines."

The Boston Globe: "Arkansas down to 8 open ICU beds amid surge; Texas Governor Abbott seeks out-of-state help against COVID-19
Abbott's request Monday came as a county-owned hospital in Houston raised tents to accommodate their COVID-19 overflow; Florida Governor DeSantis threatens to withhold school leaders' pay if they require masks
As students in many Florida counties headed back to school Monday, Republican Governor Ron DeSantis threatened to stop paying superintendents and school board members who defy his executive order banning classroom mask mandates."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 10, 2021, 08:37:21 AM
New page from the GOP playbook:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-10/abbott-appeals-for-out-of-state-help-against-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 10, 2021, 08:40:36 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 10, 2021, 08:37:21 AM
New page from the GOP playbook:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-10/abbott-appeals-for-out-of-state-help-against-covid-19

Yep:  criminal irresponsibility at home, and ask for handouts ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 10, 2021, 12:56:27 PM
What Is "Natural Immunity"? And Why Should You Get the Vaccine Even if You Already Had COVID?

How immunity works and why you should get vaccinated—even if you had COVID. (https://www.thebulwark.com/what-is-natural-immunity-and-why-should-you-get-the-vaccine-even-if-you-already-had-covid/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on August 10, 2021, 02:14:05 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 09, 2021, 09:33:23 AM
Intuition works great when you don't know anything and it doesn't matter to anyone else if you are right or wrong. For other circumstances, there is "information." :)
It can also work great if it does matter.
Like avoiding befriending someone who gives you bad vibes. Pretty common for people to not trust their gut and then regret it later.
Also, with information you have to verify it yourself if it is accurate, or from someone you trust. At that point you can go ahead and prioritize the information over your intuition.


Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 09, 2021, 09:36:19 AM
If you're trying to backpedal your peddling of conspiracy theory wares as "intuition," I ain't buying it, and I wonder how many sales you'll log among present company.
No idea what you're talking about, I never promoted any conspiracy theory. You'd have to tell me which one you are referring to.


Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 09, 2021, 10:56:42 AM
I think this is the right thread for this.
It's nice that we have grown up in a free country to where we can laugh at retards, but show this to a North Korean refugee or any slave from history and I'd bet money that they would find no humor in it at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 10, 2021, 11:41:24 PM
This makes for interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/uk/300380201/covid19-delta-variant-has-wrecked-hopes-of-uk-herd-immunity-warn-scientists

Would Australia do this after getting vaccination levels up to scratch? I'm not so sure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 11, 2021, 06:24:26 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 10, 2021, 08:37:21 AM
New page from the GOP playbook:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-10/abbott-appeals-for-out-of-state-help-against-covid-19
I was skimming through the article and wanted to go back to see exactly what he was asking for when the article was greyed-out.  I did see that he had yet to reverse his attempts to ban mask-wearing and social distancing (with some cities and districts implementing their own rules).  Also that some hospitals had to create Covid overflow areas.

What kind of help was/is the governor asking for?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 11, 2021, 06:41:46 AM
Quote from: Holden on August 10, 2021, 11:41:24 PM
This makes for interesting reading.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/uk/300380201/covid19-delta-variant-has-wrecked-hopes-of-uk-herd-immunity-warn-scientists

Would Australia do this after getting vaccination levels up to scratch? I'm not so sure.

Things look reasonably positive as far as hospitalisations go in the UK, but bear in mind all the data about the spread of the disease is problematic because it is test data, not incidence. I believe the next information on incidence will be published soon, Aug 17 maybe.

Anyway, it's early days, and we have the reopening of schools to look forward to,  as well as the colder weather meaning people spend more time inside.

That aside there is the issue of long covid, especially among the unvaccinated young, to think about. Who knows what the UK approach will mean in that respect?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 12:30:14 AM
Canberra, a city of 400,000, closing down for 7 days because of 1 identified case. Well that, I think, does look like an over-reaction. Some massive testing should do, one would think. Australia lies very low as regards vaccinated people, 20%, but the fatality rate has also been comparatively low.

......

In DK, we're past 60% of totally vaccinated people, and 74% partly vaccinated. As it's been the case for some time, problems and sickness/hospitalizations are now mainly in the unvaccinated group younger than 40 years, and in certain, especially immigrant, areas. Yet, there's only around 100 hospitalized in the entire country, and fatalities are 0 or 1 on a daily basis. Teenagers are also being vaccinated to a higher degree now.

The official strategy will focus less on daily infection numbers, it's being said - which seems to be implicitly signalling an acceptance of a certain, permanent infection level within the foreseeable future. Vaccinations will be carried through to the highest degree possible, due to their obvious effects here, but it's still considered unlikely they'll soon be obligatory for all.

......

Today, a couple of very long interviews with a Danish expert engaged in the WHO investigations in China, complaining about opposition from some Chinese authorities, and not ruling out a lab fault resulting in the virus outbreak, though it must be pointed out, it's only one of 4 scenarios:

1. transmission directly from bat to a human
2. transmission indirectly via some product, from bat to human
3. transmission from bat to another animal, then to human
4. transmission via lab errors

The sickness was likely much more widespread, when the alleged Patient Zero got it. One important laboratory was moved on the 2nd December, which is a risky business. 200,000 local blood tests from that month haven't been investigated. In the main lab, they had apes in cages. The WHO team didn't get access to lab documents or tests. Overall, the lab possibility hasn't been investigated in a scientific way.

The interviews are of course in Danish. If interested, use Google translate.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2021-08-12-ansat-paa-laboratorie-i-wuhan-kan-vaere-smittet-af-flagermus-som-den-foerste-siger
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2021-08-12-dansker-var-chef-for-whos-mission-til-wuhan-maaske-er-nogen-slet-ikke-interesseret
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 12, 2021, 01:02:40 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 12:30:14 AM
Canberra, a city of 400,000, closing down for 7 days because of 1 identified case. Well that, I think, does look like an over-reaction. Some massive testing should do, one would think. Australia lies very low as regards vaccinated people, 20%, but the fatality rate has also been comparatively low.


It's an interesting point because as far as I know the European and American experience has shown that massive testing is not an effective way to control delta. Countries with a low level of vaccination are very vulnerable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 01:05:44 AM
Massive testing, where all samples are diagnosed, is considered a very important part of the relatively successful Danish strategy. As far as I remember, it worked well in say Korea too. Delta is 95% here in DK, but the disease is less serious than before, and here we operate with areas on parish level, that can be closed down.

In the results from yesterday, the infection number was approaching close to 2% for the first time in many months, however - not the usual percentage between 0.8  to 1.6. But the R number is currently considered 1.0. It has changed between 0.9 - 1.3 for a long time. Closing down would need an incidence of 200 per 100,000 inhabitants, based on tests, until mid-July. But now it's 500, as a part of the general opening up policy. A nerdy source on local situations in municipalities etc. here: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/aa41b29149f24e20a4007a0c4e13db1d
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 01:15:50 AM
From Reuters:

In Singapore, where Delta is the most common variant, government officials reported on Friday that three quarters of its coronavirus cases occurred among vaccinated individuals, though none were severely ill.

Israeli health officials have said 60% of current hospitalized COVID-19 cases are in vaccinated people. Most of them are age 60 or older and often have underlying health problems. (https://www.reuters.com/world/china/how-delta-variant-upends-assumptions-about-coronavirus-2021-07-26/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 12, 2021, 01:35:30 AM
Canberra locked down? Does that include those dickbrain politicians? I certainly feckin hope so!!!!! If not then the whole thing is a farce. Would Pollies class themselves as essential workers? Yep!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 02:03:02 AM
So there isn't a single politician you can identify with ?  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 12, 2021, 02:50:55 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 01:05:44 AM
Massive testing, where all samples are diagnosed, is considered a very important part of the relatively successful Danish strategy. As far as I remember, it worked well in say Korea too. Delta is 95% here in DK, but the disease is less serious than before, and here we operate with areas on parish level, that can be closed down.

It's interesting -- how big is a parish?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 02:56:47 AM
Between a few hundreds and +20,000. Average is 2600. Sometimes, the parish borders have collided with actual circumstances and ~funny borders, however. There has been very few lock-downs though, I think maybe a dozen or less.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 12, 2021, 03:36:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 01:15:50 AM
From Reuters:

In Singapore, where Delta is the most common variant, government officials reported on Friday that three quarters of its coronavirus cases occurred among vaccinated individuals, though none were severely ill.

Israeli health officials have said 60% of current hospitalized COVID-19 cases are in vaccinated people. Most of them are age 60 or older and often have underlying health problems. (https://www.reuters.com/world/china/how-delta-variant-upends-assumptions-about-coronavirus-2021-07-26/)

The question, of course, is what percentage of people are vaccinated? If 100% if the population were vaccinated, then 100% of the cases would be in vaccinated people. The higher the percentage of people who are vaccinated, the higher the percentage of cases will be breakthrough cases - that is to be expected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 12, 2021, 03:50:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 02:56:47 AM
Between a few hundreds and +20,000. Average is 2600. Sometimes, the parish borders have collided with actual circumstances and ~funny borders, however. There has been very few lock-downs though, I think maybe a dozen or less.

What I'm guessing is that R0 of delta is lower in Denmark than in England, for example, because the population is more sparsely distributed. People just come into contact with each other a lot less. How well is the disease controlled in the major urban conglomerations?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 12, 2021, 03:57:06 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 12:30:14 AM
Canberra, a city of 400,000, closing down for 7 days because of 1 identified case. Well that, I think, does look like an over-reaction. Some massive testing should do, one would think. Australia lies very low as regards vaccinated people, 20%, but the fatality rate has also been comparatively low.

......

In DK, we're past 60% of totally vaccinated people, and 74% partly vaccinated. As it's been the case for some time, problems and sickness/hospitalizations are now mainly in the unvaccinated group younger than 40 years, and in certain, especially immigrant, areas. Yet, there's only around 100 hospitalized in the entire country, and fatalities are 0 or 1 on a daily basis. Teenagers are also being vaccinated to a higher degree now.

The official strategy will focus less on daily infection numbers, it's being said - which seems to be implicitly signalling an acceptance of a certain, permanent infection level within the foreseeable future. Vaccinations will be carried through to the highest degree possible, due to their obvious effects here, but it's still considered unlikely they'll soon be obligatory for all.

......

Today, a couple of very long interviews with a Danish expert engaged in the WHO investigations in China, complaining about opposition from some Chinese authorities, and not ruling out a lab fault resulting in the virus outbreak, though it must be pointed out, it's only one of 4 scenarios:

1. transmission directly from bat to a human
2. transmission indirectly via some product, from bat to human
3. transmission from bat to another animal, then to human
4. transmission via lab errors

The sickness was likely much more widespread, when the alleged Patient Zero got it. One important laboratory was moved on the 2nd December, which is a risky business. 200,000 local blood tests from that month haven't been investigated. In the main lab, they had apes in cages. The WHO team didn't get access to lab documents or tests. Overall, the lab possibility hasn't been investigated in a scientific way.

The interviews are of course in Danish. If interested, use Google translate.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2021-08-12-ansat-paa-laboratorie-i-wuhan-kan-vaere-smittet-af-flagermus-som-den-foerste-siger
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2021-08-12-dansker-var-chef-for-whos-mission-til-wuhan-maaske-er-nogen-slet-ikke-interesseret
Wow, one case and they closed down an entire city!   ???  I'm surprised too that the vaccination percentage is so low in Australia.  Any idea why?

Glad to hear that the vaccination rate is so high in Denmark...good job!

I had found maps by county in the US which showed number of infections.  There were two of them:  one roughly from mid-July(?) of this year and the other about a month later; shocking to see how quickly things went south.  Alas, I can't remember where I saw them though.  I was hoping to provide a link to them here.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 12, 2021, 04:12:14 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 02:03:02 AM
So there isn't a single politician you can identify with ?  :)

No
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 05:26:57 AM
Quote from: Holden on August 12, 2021, 04:12:14 AM
No

Me neither. There is no single politician or party in my country which I can identify with. I've always voted rather against a party or politician than for another.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 05:30:08 AM
Quote from: krummholz on August 12, 2021, 03:36:45 AM
The question, of course, is what percentage of people are vaccinated? If 100% if the population were vaccinated, then 100% of the cases would be in vaccinated people. The higher the percentage of people who are vaccinated, the higher the percentage of cases will be breakthrough cases - that is to be expected.

This is a good point, certainly. Yet the fact that vaccinated people can get, and transmit, the disease just as easy as the non-vaccinated ones should give pause to anyone contemplating, supporting or implementing discrimination against the latter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 12, 2021, 06:40:12 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 05:30:08 AM
This is a good point, certainly. Yet the fact that vaccinated people can get, and transmit, the disease just as easy as the non-vaccinated ones should give pause to anyone contemplating, supporting or implementing discrimination against the latter.

Twaddle. Have you been drinking that you think what I have italicized above is a fact? Looks fresh off the page of a tabloid.

Why are you so emotionally involved in defending the vaccine-deniers? (rhetorical question)

Slammed Louisiana Coroner on Why His State Is 'Way Behind' in the COVID Fight
Spiking caseloads and long lines at ERs have the vaccination rate ticking up in Louisiana—but Dr. Charles Preston says it's not nearly enough. (https://www.thedailybeast.com/slammed-louisiana-coroner-charles-preston-on-why-his-state-is-way-behind-in-the-covid-fight?ref=home)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 12, 2021, 06:44:19 AM
And speaking of the irrational and self-righteous:

Aides Warned Trump About Anti-Vax MAGA Fans. He Did Nothing.
"I have practically begged him to get out there constantly and make videos calling on his supporters who are hesitant to get their shots," one person close to Trump said. (https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-knew-maga-fans-wouldnt-trust-the-vax-he-kept-quiet-anyway)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 12, 2021, 06:53:04 AM
No hypocrisy on the part of Trumpist Republicans can surprise anyone.

Rand Paul discloses 16 months late that his wife bought stock in company behind covid treatment (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/11/rand-paul-gilead-stock/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 12, 2021, 06:57:38 AM
Hospitals struggle with staff shortages in coronavirus hot spots

"I wake up every night and ask myself, 'What else can I be doing?' " said Maggie Hansen, senior vice president and chief nurse executive at Memorial, where the census of patients with covid-19 has soared from about 100 four weeks ago to 670 on Wednesday. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/staff-shortages-hospitals-covid/2021/08/12/85f636b4-fa97-11eb-8a67-f14cd1d28e47_story.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 12, 2021, 07:33:29 AM
I found those maps that I had mentioned earlier--showing how quickly Covid-19 had engulfed the United States again.  :(

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/11/health/one-month-later-these-maps-show-how-quickly-covid-engulfed-the-us-again/index.html

One map is from July 5, 2021 and the other is dated August 9, 2021.  There are also other maps (scroll down) showing the progression of the virus.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 12, 2021, 09:21:27 AM
Trump has blood on his hands. But the MAGA-verse don't care none.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 12, 2021, 09:47:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 12, 2021, 09:21:27 AM
Trump has blood on his hands. But the MAGA-verse don't care none.
As has been written...
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51L1zBQBAjL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 12, 2021, 09:58:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 12, 2021, 03:50:25 AM
What I'm guessing is that R0 of delta is lower in Denmark than in England, for example, because the population is more sparsely distributed. People just come into contact with each other a lot less. How well is the disease controlled in the major urban conglomerations?

I really don't know why the Delta R seems lower in DK. The urban percentage of the population in DK is 88, in England it's apparently 83 (UK gov source from 2021 regarding England). Spreading tends to be bigger in urban areas in DK, especially those with lower vaccine share or lower virus precaution awareness, plus a dense population, say also per habitation unit. Only Pfizer and Moderna are used, and no other vaccines. It's being said however that the number of cases will probably go up now due to opening, autumn, and the end of school holidays, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 12, 2021, 10:06:00 AM
I read on the BBC's website earlier today that apparently a nurse in Northern Germany injected some people with saline solution rather than a vaccine.  They're not certain how many she did this to.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58186032

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on August 12, 2021, 10:23:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 12, 2021, 05:30:08 AM
This is a good point, certainly. Yet the fact that vaccinated people can get, and transmit, the disease just as easy as the non-vaccinated ones should give pause to anyone contemplating, supporting or implementing discrimination against the latter.
This is what I've heard, too, actually my mom was just telling about someone she knew who was vaccinated who got back from a cruise, and got tested herself only because her son was sick. She tested positive without symptoms. So supposedly her vaccine just reduced the symptoms... but of course we'll have to wait to see if this is a large scale thing or just some weird story.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 12, 2021, 11:33:49 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-12/hospitals-pushed-to-brink-as-delta-sparks-hunt-for-more-staff

You should be able to get around paywall by accessing thru Google.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 12, 2021, 12:23:39 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 12, 2021, 11:33:49 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-12/hospitals-pushed-to-brink-as-delta-sparks-hunt-for-more-staff

You should be able to get around paywall by accessing thru Google.
Very hard to read.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 13, 2021, 04:46:26 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/13/texas-covid-abbott-deploys-2500-out-of-state-medical-workers-as-younger-patients-crowd-hospitals.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 13, 2021, 05:24:38 AM
I watched this on CNN this morning.  It's a short video of a young couple whose 1 year old is in the hospital with Covid and they can't even visit him due to restrictions.  People have reached out and asked about how they can help.  He said that the only way that you could help is by getting your vaccines.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/08/13/arkansas-dad-baby-in-hospital-coronavirus-struggles-sot-newday-vpx.cnn

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 13, 2021, 05:56:46 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 12, 2021, 06:40:12 AM
Twaddle. Have you been drinking that you think what I have italicized above is a fact? Looks fresh off the page of a tabloid.

It's right there in the Reuters text, in plain English: three quarters of the Singapore cases and 60% of the Israel cases are fully vaccinated. If this doesn't mean that vaccinated people can get the virus just as non-vaccinated people then words and logic have lost their meaning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 13, 2021, 06:19:13 AM
US averaging a half-million new vaccinations per day for the first time since June; Medford (Mass.) Public Schools will require masks in the fall; Germany says US among high-risk countries — The German government has elevated Turkey, U.S. and Israel to high-risk status, the Funke media group reports, citing unidentified officials. Germany also raises Montenegro and Vietnam to high-risk.

Portugal is no longer classified as a high-risk area, except for Lisbon and the Algarve. People entering Germany from affected countries must quarantine for 10 days if they can't show proof of vaccination or recovery from illness.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 13, 2021, 06:23:20 AM
Japan on Friday reported its first case of the lambda variant, linking it to an unnamed female who arrived in July for the Tokyo Olympics, Kyodo News reported. Tokyo reported a record number of new cases Friday, 5,773, and nationwide cases exceeded 20,000 for the first time, NHK reported.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 13, 2021, 06:29:09 AM
Was taken out to dinner yesterday by an old friend from out of town.  He and his wife both contracted COVID early on, got hit pretty rough, but not so severely as to require hospitalization. They both suffer long-term shortness of breath. Especially regrettable in the wife's case, as she is a talented soprano.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 13, 2021, 06:32:19 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on July 30, 2021, 09:03:58 PM
Thanks, PD.
Sorry if I missed it, but I was wondering 1)  How is your sister doing?  and 2)  Did you get your first round of the Covid vaccine while you were off that week?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 06:56:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 13, 2021, 06:32:19 AM
Sorry if I missed it, but I was wondering 1)  How is your sister doing?  and 2)  Did you get your first round of the Covid vaccine while you were off that week?

PD

My sister is doing a lot better. Thank you for asking. I get the first jab of Pfizer in approximately one hour. I ended up just scheduling an appointment at my local Walgreens.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 06:57:39 AM
I don't like Gene Simmons or the whole schtick that he projects, but what he said here makes a lot of sense:

https://www.youtube.com/v/ycGGgoHwmuo

"It's not about you, it's about other people." Something this simple is what people have a horrible time coming to terms with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 13, 2021, 09:55:02 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 06:56:48 AM
My sister is doing a lot better. Thank you for asking. I get the first jab of Pfizer in approximately one hour. I ended up just scheduling an appointment at my local Walgreens.

Good to hear! Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 13, 2021, 10:08:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 13, 2021, 09:55:02 AM
Good to hear! Good luck!

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 13, 2021, 12:06:48 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 13, 2021, 10:08:49 AM
+1
+2

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 07:13:06 PM
Thanks, guys. I got the Pfizer first dosage and all I have right now is a sore left arm. I go back in early September for the 2nd shot. A booster will probably be needed after the 2nd, but we'll see how things go.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 07:52:43 PM
I was talking to a woman at work today and she's rather ambivalent about getting the vaccine. I told her that it's ultimately her decision, but then I mentioned that, basically, the vaccine kept my sister from becoming critically ill. I also told her the longer she waits, the probability of her getting it is much higher. She wants to wait until the vaccine is mandated, but I told her to forget the mandate and get as soon as she can.

To be honest, I had no reason for waiting as long as I did. I suppose it was more fear than anything else. Fear of what the vaccine will do in the short-term, but also the long-term. Anyway, I believe this is the only way we can truly deal with this pandemic since it's so blatantly apparent that people can't abide by simple guidelines. If they can't follow any rules then getting the vaccine would be the simple solution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 14, 2021, 06:42:31 AM
A very good friend of mine, aged 66, dithered for quite some time. He just got his second shot this week. He was afraid of side effects. He went to Egypt some 30 years ago and had been sick like a dog for 3 weeks following the mandatory vaccines for that travel.

In the end he got the Pfizer shots and experienced zero side effects.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 14, 2021, 07:22:24 AM
Sad milestone reached in Finland: 1002 corona deaths.  :-\

68.7 % of Finns have got at least one shot
42.0 % of Finns have got the 2nd dose.
88 Finns are currently hospitalized of which 23 are in intensive care.
Vaccinations of 12-15 olds have started this week.
There are more daily cases now than ever. Delta variant is really bad! Life sucks so much!

Quote from: Mirror Image on August 13, 2021, 07:13:06 PM
Thanks, guys. I got the Pfizer first dosage and all I have right now is a sore left arm. I go back in early September for the 2nd shot. A booster will probably be needed after the 2nd, but we'll see how things go.

Great! Also great that your sister is doing better.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 14, 2021, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: André on August 14, 2021, 06:42:31 AM
A very good friend of mine, aged 66, dithered for quite some time. He just got his second shot this week. He was afraid of side effects. He went to Egypt some 30 years ago and had been sick like a dog for 3 weeks following the mandatory vaccines for that travel.

In the end he got the Pfizer shots and experienced zero side effects.

Excellent to read, indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 15, 2021, 01:50:43 PM
Got my second dose on Saturday and felt a bit poorly yesterday. Just a runny nose, slightly elevated temperature, headache and slightly sore muscles. I'm assuming it's after effects as this rarely happens to me. I'm already feeling better today with just a little fatigue remaining. I'm glad that I've done this as I took it up as soon as I became eligible.

The rollout has been slow here in OZ all caused by political dithering (federal and state). The escalated case numbers in NSW seems, however, to have accelerated the uptake and I hope this continues. The husband of a friend of mine is a relatively high ranking policeman in Qld. He told her that lockdowns will become a thing of the past after November. All I can think is that the Qld government's projected vaccination targets will be met by then and that they already have a plan in place. Let's hope so and that's it's an end to all this political manoeuvring which frankly has been both shameful and cringeworthy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on August 15, 2021, 05:30:28 PM
China Invents Fake Swiss Scientist For Wuhan Lab Propaganda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed1xOylQBu0


This is hilarious. China making up the name "Wilson Edwards" for a Swiss person, and not even one person in Switzerland has that name.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 15, 2021, 11:08:09 PM
Quote from: greg on August 15, 2021, 05:30:28 PM
China Invents Fake Swiss Scientist For Wuhan Lab Propaganda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed1xOylQBu0


This is hilarious. China making up the name "Wilson Edwards" for a Swiss person, and not even one person in Switzerland has that name.  ;D

That way nobody in Switzerland can sue them for slander. That's why they didn't choose Hans Huber.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 16, 2021, 07:56:14 AM
Quote from: Holden on August 15, 2021, 01:50:43 PM
Got my second dose on Saturday and felt a bit poorly yesterday. Just a runny nose, slightly elevated temperature, headache and slightly sore muscles. I'm assuming it's after effects as this rarely happens to me. I'm already feeling better today with just a little fatigue remaining. I'm glad that I've done this as I took it up as soon as I became eligible.

The rollout has been slow here in OZ all caused by political dithering (federal and state). The escalated case numbers in NSW seems, however, to have accelerated the uptake and I hope this continues. The husband of a friend of mine is a relatively high ranking policeman in Qld. He told her that lockdowns will become a thing of the past after November. All I can think is that the Qld government's projected vaccination targets will be met by then and that they already have a plan in place. Let's hope so and that's it's an end to all this political manoeuvring which frankly has been both shameful and cringeworthy.

Excellent to read and, yes, I find it a disgrace that this pandemic has been politicized to the point of polarization. Vaccines need to be mandated and it's the only way we're going to effectively defeat COVID. We just had some huge spikes in non-vaccinated COVID cases here in Georgia and the governor here sees no reason to mandate masks, but he hasn't done anything for this state since he's been elected. A lame duck and a worthless human being.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 16, 2021, 01:13:19 PM
I'm ambivalent about masks, in particular the mass produced ones that everyone seems to wear. Research strongly suggests that they don't work and can actually cause or exacerbate other health issues. They were originally designed to stop the inhalation of large particles such as you would find in cities with high air pollution levels and that design has not radically changed. Their ability to significantly stop the inhalation and exhalation of micro droplets is extremely limited.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 16, 2021, 01:23:26 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 16, 2021, 01:13:19 PM
I'm ambivalent about masks, in particular the mass produced ones that everyone seems to wear. Research strongly suggests that they don't work and can actually cause or exacerbate other health issues. They were originally designed to stop the inhalation of large particles such as you would find in cities with high air pollution levels and that design has not radically changed. Their ability to significantly stop the inhalation and exhalation of micro droplets is extremely limited.

I actually wear two masks in one, but, yes, they don't free you from exposure to COVID and this goes for anyone who wears them. I suppose it's a false sense of security in the long run. I'm not sure whether they've helped me, but I suppose watching who I'm around and what I'm walking into helps. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 16, 2021, 01:29:10 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on August 16, 2021, 01:23:26 PM
I actually wear two masks in one, but, yes, they don't free you from exposure to COVID and this goes for anyone who wears them. I suppose it's a false sense of security in the long run. I'm not sure whether they've helped me, but I suppose watching who I'm around and what I'm walking into helps. :)
My understanding is that one wears masks to protect others.  That's what I've been hearing over the news--and also my experience in Japan, i.e., if one has a cold or virus, one puts on a mask to protect the greater society.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 16, 2021, 01:42:09 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 16, 2021, 01:29:10 PM
My understanding is that one wears masks to protect others.  That's what I've been hearing over the news--and also my experience in Japan, i.e., if one has a cold or virus, one puts on a mask to protect the greater society.

PD

Yeah, which is why it's so difficult to get people to wear them, because they selfishly would rather spread their germs, then look out for others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 16, 2021, 06:43:46 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 16, 2021, 01:29:10 PM
My understanding is that one wears masks to protect others.  That's what I've been hearing over the news--and also my experience in Japan, i.e., if one has a cold or virus, one puts on a mask to protect the greater society.

PD

The problem with this is that a sneeze or a cough sends the breath micro droplets straight through this type of mask. Even breathing hard will cause this to happen. There have been some interesting experiments done.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 16, 2021, 07:00:42 PM
Scrolling down through 5 different studies, they show a reducing infection effect between 25-50 %, but the conclusions are often made with some reservations. However, that is an effect to count with.

Masks have been used by medical staff during operations  etc for decades, due to their various benefits.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 16, 2021, 07:07:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 16, 2021, 06:43:46 PM
The problem with this is that a sneeze or a cough sends the breath micro droplets straight through this type of mask. Even breathing hard will cause this to happen. There have been some interesting experiments done.

The mask doesn't work by stopping droplets.

When you cough or exhale forcefully you produce a "jet." A jet occurs when a collimated flow such as a pipe flow enters an open fluid volume. The collimated flow can project a surprising distance into the fluid volume before is dissipates. When you wear a face covering, even a simple cloth covering, the jet is disrupted and you produce a diffuse cloud, rather than a jet. This can reduce the chances that you project virus particles to a nearby person, even though the virus laden droplets are not stopped by the mask.

You can do your own experiment. Try to blow out a candle while wearing a mask.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 17, 2021, 12:33:38 AM
Obviously if you wear a good mask correctly it will effect the flow from your mouth and nose. I don't know how significantly that effects the spread of delta, and I don't know whether the actual uses of face coverings significantly neutralise the effect.


More interesting to me is the way that masks have become fetishised, like a visible token of good citizenship, or a talisman against infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 17, 2021, 03:53:05 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 16, 2021, 07:07:01 PM
The mask doesn't work by stopping droplets.

When you cough or exhale forcefully you produce a "jet." A jet occurs when a collimated flow such as a pipe flow enters an open fluid volume. The collimated flow can project a surprising distance into the fluid volume before is dissipates. When you wear a face covering, even a simple cloth covering, the jet is disrupted and you produce a diffuse cloud, rather than a jet. This can reduce the chances that you project virus particles to a nearby person, even though the virus laden droplets are not stopped by the mask.

You can do your own experiment. Try to blow out a candle while wearing a mask.

Thank you for that explanation!  Quite helpful.

How many people have double-masked here?  I've only done so a few times (when near a friend who has asthma and is older even though she had been vaccinated; I was still waiting to be eligible at the time.).  They're extremely hot and uncomfortable though thankfully it wasn't 90 degrees out.

Some neighbors of mine also made those clear plastic face shields.  I haven't tried to do that.  Anyone here wear one of those?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2021, 06:13:15 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 17, 2021, 03:53:05 AM
Thank you for that explanation!  Quite helpful.

How many people have double-masked here?  I've only done so a few times (when near a friend who has asthma and is older even though she had been vaccinated; I was still waiting to be eligible at the time.).  They're extremely hot and uncomfortable though thankfully it wasn't 90 degrees out.

Some neighbors of mine also made those clear plastic face shields.  I haven't tried to do that.  Anyone here wear one of those?

PD

No, but when I see my PCP, she dons one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2021, 06:15:44 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 16, 2021, 07:07:01 PM
The mask doesn't work by stopping droplets.

When you cough or exhale forcefully you produce a "jet." A jet occurs when a collimated flow such as a pipe flow enters an open fluid volume. The collimated flow can project a surprising distance into the fluid volume before is dissipates. When you wear a face covering, even a simple cloth covering, the jet is disrupted and you produce a diffuse cloud, rather than a jet. This can reduce the chances that you project virus particles to a nearby person, even though the virus laden droplets are not stopped by the mask.

You can do your own experiment. Try to blow out a candle while wearing a mask.


Yes, there are actual benefits to both the wearer and those around the wearer. Which is nothing like a "fetish."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 17, 2021, 07:30:51 AM
Apparently, booster shots for fully vaccinated people will soon be authorized in the US, with the shots becoming available mid to late September. Here's a link to a WaPo "live update" - the link will probably point to a different story by day's end and is likely paywalled, but FWIW...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/17/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/17/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 17, 2021, 07:40:50 AM
Quote from: krummholz on August 17, 2021, 07:30:51 AM
Apparently, booster shots for fully vaccinated people will soon be authorized in the US, with the shots becoming available mid to late September. Here's a link to a WaPo "live update" - the link will probably point to a different story by day's end and is likely paywalled, but FWIW...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/17/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/17/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/)

Yes, when I got my first dosage of Pfizer, I talked to the pharmacist and she said I'll definitely want to get the booster shot after I've had my second dose. It'll probably be October before I'm able to get the booster, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 17, 2021, 07:54:45 AM
I'm 63, have long expected booster to be recommended and will get it when available. I got the Pfizer, 2nd shot April 5.
From what I've read, booster discipline will follow the same course as the initial vaccinations: mainly inverse age order, with [this part my assumption] certain jobs (medical, first responder, ...) also getting priority.
So if boosters begin in October, my dose might be in Nov, even Dec.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 17, 2021, 08:21:26 AM
I read somewhere that boosters are recommended 8 months after completion of the initial vaccine. There was talk of a vaccine re-designed to be more effective against the Delta variant. With the mRNA vaccines it should be very simple to switch over to the delta variant sequence. But that would presumably entail a new round of testing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 17, 2021, 09:30:57 AM
The talk from Health authorities here is that booster shots might be considered for immuno-depressed people (chemotherapy, leukemia etc) but not for the general population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 17, 2021, 10:16:19 AM
Quote from: André on August 17, 2021, 09:30:57 AM
The talk from Health authorities here is that booster shots might be considered for immuno-depressed people (chemotherapy, leukemia etc) but not for the general population.

Ah, this makes sense. I guess we'll just have to continue to read updates about it. If this is the case, my dad would most definitely benefit from the booster since he has an auto-immune disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 17, 2021, 10:27:36 AM
But note that André is in Québec - the news about boosters being authorized soon for the general public applies to the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 17, 2021, 11:41:14 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/17/covid-vaccine-booster-shots-nih-director-says-new-israel-data-is-building-case-in-the-us.html

NIH director says new Israeli Covid data is building case for booster shots in the U.S.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 17, 2021, 01:53:41 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/17/texas-gov-abbott-who-banned-mask-mandates-tests-positive-for-covid.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 17, 2021, 05:34:59 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 17, 2021, 11:41:14 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/17/covid-vaccine-booster-shots-nih-director-says-new-israel-data-is-building-case-in-the-us.html

NIH director says new Israeli Covid data is building case for booster shots in the U.S.

I don't know if it's a media issue but there are things that seem to have happened with the Israeli vaccination program that don't appear to be happening anywhere else.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on August 17, 2021, 05:40:30 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 17, 2021, 05:34:59 PM
I don't know if it's a media issue but there are things that seem to have happened with the Israeli vaccination program that don't appear to be happening anywhere else.

Possibly a result of Israel rolling out its vaccinations before a lot of other places? So it's experiencing the same thing as other countries with similar vaccination rates but (in terms of waning effectiveness) a certain number of weeks or months earlier.
That would be my guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 17, 2021, 05:44:28 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 17, 2021, 05:34:59 PM
I don't know if it's a media issue but there are things that seem to have happened with the Israeli vaccination program that don't appear to be happening anywhere else.

Strongly agreed. There was a story some weeks ago (I'm sure I posted it far above) about an Israeli study showing that Pfizer (2 doses) had only 40% efficacy at preventing infection with Delta.
All subsequent releases from other sources have given much higher numbers, but I never saw any official rebuttal of the Israeli study.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 17, 2021, 11:26:47 PM
 I was wondering if it was an interpretation of data issue. That's the only thing that makes sense to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 18, 2021, 04:40:46 AM
Just heard on the news that the state of Alabama has negative eleven ICU beds!  Which means, apparently, that they are having to stay in the ERs.  How long can that last?!   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 18, 2021, 07:02:18 AM
(emphasis added)

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/18/covid-booster-shots-us-to-begin-wide-distribution-of-third-vaccine-doses-next-month.html

The United States will begin widely distributing Covid-19 booster shots next month as new data shows that vaccine protection wanes over time, top U.S. health officials announced in a joint statement Wednesday.

It's now "very clear" that immunity starts to fall after the initial two doses, and with the dominance of the delta variant, "we are starting to see evidence of reduced protection against mild and moderate disease," according to the statement signed by CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock, White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci and other U.S. health leaders. "Based on our latest assessment, the current protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and death could diminish in the months ahead, especially among those who are at higher risk or were vaccinated during the earlier phases of the vaccination rollout."

As a result, U.S. agencies are preparing to offer booster shots to all eligible Americans beginning the week of Sept. 20, starting 8 months after their second dose of Pfizer or Moderna's vaccines, officials said. While they said recipients of Johnson & Johnson's single-shot vaccine will likely need boosters, they are awaiting more data in the next few weeks before making a formal recommendation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 18, 2021, 08:22:36 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 18, 2021, 04:40:46 AM
Just heard on the news that the state of Alabama has negative eleven ICU beds!  Which means, apparently, that they are having to stay in the ERs.  How long can that last?!   :(

PD

Ghastly! I think, "what if that had been me when I suffered my stroke?"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 18, 2021, 09:04:46 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 18, 2021, 04:40:46 AM
Just heard on the news that the state of Alabama has negative eleven ICU beds!  Which means, apparently, that they are having to stay in the ERs.  How long can that last?!   :(

PD

There was a time when this was happening in some European countries -- in  Alsace France for example. They moved them to another region where there was some spare capacity. Why can't this happen in Alabama? Find an ICU bed in another state and put them on a plane and get them there fast! Or is there something fundamental about the States which I've not understood?

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualites/1/societe/coronavirus-aide-militaire-sans-precedent-pour-les-patients-en-alsace_2121313.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on August 18, 2021, 09:10:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 18, 2021, 09:04:46 AM
There was a time when this was happening in some European countries -- in  Alsace France for example. They moved them to another region where there was some spare capacity. Why can't this happen in Alabama? Find an ICU bed in another state and put them on a plane and get them there fast! Or is there something fundamental about the States which I've not understood?

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualites/1/societe/coronavirus-aide-militaire-sans-precedent-pour-les-patients-en-alsace_2121313.html

I wonder if it is a health insurance issue. I have pretty universal coverage but my wife has an HMO and is limited in where she can have health care and by whom, and so too our children through her insurance. I would assume that bringing medical assistance into a state alleviates some of those issues, although I don't pretend to be an expert on this issue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 18, 2021, 09:28:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 18, 2021, 09:04:46 AM
There was a time when this was happening in some European countries -- in  Alsace France for example. They moved them to another region where there was some spare capacity. Why can't this happen in Alabama? Find an ICU bed in another state and put them on a plane and get them there fast! Or is there something fundamental about the States which I've not understood?

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualites/1/societe/coronavirus-aide-militaire-sans-precedent-pour-les-patients-en-alsace_2121313.html

It's been happening in USA.
I saw a story yesterday.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-16/u-s-lowers-india-advisory-mgm-s-vaccine-mandate-virus-update

Mississippi, Alabama Hospitals Divert to Kentucky (4:17 p.m. NY)
Hospitals in Mississippi and Alabama are sending patients across their borders to Kentucky even as Bluegrass State officials warn their hospitals are running short on available staff and beds.

"We're very close to having all of our hospitals full," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, said Tuesday in Frankfort. "By the end of this week we expect to have more people in the hospital battling Covid than we've ever had in this pandemic."

New infections in Kentucky, population 4.5 million, have risen to 2,000 or more per day from a low of fewer than 150 cases per day in June, according to the Kentucky Department for Public Health. Helping other states' overwhelmed hospitals no longer may be possible, because this week Kentucky will exceed its record for intensive care unit patients, around 1,200 patients, and several Kentucky hospitals are deciding to limit or stop non-emergency care to preserve stretched staff, Beshear said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 18, 2021, 09:37:07 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 18, 2021, 09:04:46 AM
There was a time when this was happening in some European countries -- in  Alsace France for example. They moved them to another region where there was some spare capacity. Why can't this happen in Alabama? Find an ICU bed in another state and put them on a plane and get them there fast! Or is there something fundamental about the States which I've not understood?

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualites/1/societe/coronavirus-aide-militaire-sans-precedent-pour-les-patients-en-alsace_2121313.html
Quote from: VonStupp on August 18, 2021, 09:10:41 AM
I wonder if it is a health insurance issue. I have pretty universal coverage but my wife has an HMO and is limited in where she can have health care and by whom, and so too our children through her insurance. I would assume that bringing medical assistance into a state alleviates some of those issues, although I don't pretend to be an expert on this issue.
Good question Mandryka.  And good point V.S.  I wonder if it will get to the point at which the US government will have to enact some kind of emergency edict/legislation....not certain what to call it so that people, if necessary, can and will be covered by their insurance even if it is at a place outside of their currently allowable places?

Currently, I've been hearing about more and more states (particularly in the south) setting up field hospitals/tents, etc.....trying to use their creativity and available resources to make things work.

PD

EDIT: 
Quote from: T. D. on August 18, 2021, 09:28:36 AM
It's been happening in USA.
I saw a story yesterday.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-16/u-s-lowers-india-advisory-mgm-s-vaccine-mandate-virus-update

Mississippi, Alabama Hospitals Divert to Kentucky (4:17 p.m. NY)
Hospitals in Mississippi and Alabama are sending patients across their borders to Kentucky even as Bluegrass State officials warn their hospitals are running short on available staff and beds.

"We're very close to having all of our hospitals full," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, said Tuesday in Frankfort. "By the end of this week we expect to have more people in the hospital battling Covid than we've ever had in this pandemic."

New infections in Kentucky, population 4.5 million, have risen to 2,000 or more per day from a low of fewer than 150 cases per day in June, according to the Kentucky Department for Public Health. Helping other states' overwhelmed hospitals no longer may be possible, because this week Kentucky will exceed its record for intensive care unit patients, around 1,200 patients, and several Kentucky hospitals are deciding to limit or stop non-emergency care to preserve stretched staff, Beshear said.

Just read your posting T.D.  I'm glad that they're helping each other, but also have been wondering how things will work when/if other states start saying "Sorry, we have no room."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on August 18, 2021, 02:24:21 PM
Ireland is only a small nation but we have always punched well above our weight, internationally. And so it is with Covid vaccinations. We currently stand second, behind Malta, in the EU in terms of uptake rate: https://www.irishpost.com/news/ireland-has-2nd-best-vaccine-uptake-in-european-union-218416

Good for Malta  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 18, 2021, 03:31:35 PM
Garth Brooks cancels Gillette Stadium show due to COVID-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 18, 2021, 04:55:12 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-18/covid-vaccines-are-less-effective-against-delta-in-u-k-study

Large study finds Pfizer-BioNTech efficacy ebbed over time
Data show vaccines didn't diminish viral load of delta cases

Vaccines against Covid-19 are less effective against the delta variant, a large U.K. study showed in results that may fuel a push for booster shots for fully vaccinated people.


You can probably use Google to sidestep paywall.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 19, 2021, 12:30:15 AM
Quote from: aligreto on August 18, 2021, 02:24:21 PM
Ireland is only a small nation but we have always punched well above our weight, internationally. And so it is with Covid vaccinations. We currently stand second, behind Malta, in the EU in terms of uptake rate: https://www.irishpost.com/news/ireland-has-2nd-best-vaccine-uptake-in-european-union-218416

Good for Malta  :)

It is an confusing (sloppy) article....
It keeps talking about vaccine acceptency, while in a actual fact these are the numbers for full vaccinations.

But god job, Ireland!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 19, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 18, 2021, 07:02:18 AM
(emphasis added)

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/18/covid-booster-shots-us-to-begin-wide-distribution-of-third-vaccine-doses-next-month.html

The United States will begin widely distributing Covid-19 booster shots next month as new data shows that vaccine protection wanes over time, top U.S. health officials announced in a joint statement Wednesday.

It's now "very clear" that immunity starts to fall after the initial two doses, and with the dominance of the delta variant, "we are starting to see evidence of reduced protection against mild and moderate disease," according to the statement signed by CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock, White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci and other U.S. health leaders. "Based on our latest assessment, the current protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and death could diminish in the months ahead, especially among those who are at higher risk or were vaccinated during the earlier phases of the vaccination rollout."

Hah! My twaddle (https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,29665.msg1386680.html#msg1386680) is vindicated by none other than Dr. Fauci.

QuoteAs a result, U.S. agencies are preparing to offer booster shots to all eligible Americans beginning the week of Sept. 20, starting 8 months after their second dose of Pfizer or Moderna's vaccines, officials said. While they said recipients of Johnson & Johnson's single-shot vaccine will likely need boosters, they are awaiting more data in the next few weeks before making a formal recommendation.

And then come the epsilon variant and they'll have to boost the booster; and after that, come the lambda variant, and the boost will need its own booster, aso asf. This looks more and more like a worldwide-scale vaccinological experiment in a constant state of tweaking and less and less like the tested, safe and efficient vaccines we were supposed to believe we have.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 19, 2021, 06:00:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 19, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
[...] and less and less like the tested, safe and efficient vaccines we were supposed to believe we have.

Not for the first time you are selectively inattentive:  No one has claimed that the vaccine has been completely tested. Nor has there been as claim that it is 100% safe.  It has been reasonably safe and efficient (something which even your snark will not deny).

As to this being an experiment, we've all been placed in a real-time experiment by the pandemic. So what's your beef? That the scientists are doing their job?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 19, 2021, 06:39:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 18, 2021, 03:31:35 PM
Garth Brooks cancels Gillette Stadium show due to COVID-19

And so it follows with others:

Covid: Stevie Nicks cancels US performances to 'keep healthy' (https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-58169510)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 19, 2021, 06:56:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 19, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
Hah! My twaddle (https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,29665.msg1386680.html#msg1386680) is vindicated by none other than Dr. Fauci.

And then come the epsilon variant and they'll have to boost the booster; and after that, come the lambda variant, and the boost will need its own booster, aso asf. This looks more and more like a worldwide-scale vaccinological experiment in a constant state of tweaking and less and less like the tested, safe and efficient vaccines we were supposed to believe we have.

Andrei, my sister is living proof that the vaccine does work. She has already made a full recovery from COVID and is doing fine. If she hadn't received the vaccine, I might be whistling a different tune. I also recently saw a story on the local news where someone was in ICU with COVID and was given the vaccine and they made a miraculous recovery not long after receiving the first dosage. But this is just one story out of thousands. We're living in a time where the future depends on getting more people healthy and the only way to defeat COVID is by everyone getting vaccinated. Senseless deaths are something this world doesn't need and the only thing that we can do is help curve the death toll. I don't have any control over what people do like those who may have COVID that go to sporting events and sneeze on people, but I can only do my civic duty and be aware of the people that I'm around. I remained ambivalent about the vaccine for quite some time, but after what happened to my sister, the severity of not getting the vaccine made me drop what I was doing at that moment and schedule to get it the next day. When something hits home like this did, it made me reconsider my previous position in a heartbeat.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 19, 2021, 08:02:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 19, 2021, 06:00:55 AM
Not for the first time you are selectively inattentive:  No one has claimed that the vaccine has been completely tested. Nor has there been as claim that it is 100% safe.  It has been reasonably safe and efficient (something which even your snark will not deny).

As to this being an experiment, we've all been placed in a real-time experiment by the pandemic. So what's your beef? That the scientists are doing their job?

Exactly. Pandemics will happen as world population grows, humans occupy new territory (deforestation), disturb ecosystems, climate changes (who knows what's buried in permafrost and is now thawing?) and labs the world over study and test viruses. Whatever the source of this or the next pandemics, swiftness of reaction will be key.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 19, 2021, 08:49:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 19, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
And then come the epsilon variant and they'll have to boost the booster; and after that, come the lambda variant, and the boost will need its own booster, aso asf. This looks more and more like a worldwide-scale vaccinological experiment in a constant state of tweaking and less and less like the tested, safe and efficient vaccines we were supposed to believe we have.

It is a good business for drug companies for sure, but what can we do? Good luck to anti-vaxxers surviving delta, epsilon, lambda,... variants. At least those who get vaccinated have a better chance staying alive and out of hospitals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 19, 2021, 09:14:32 AM
To put it in perspective, there is a Coronavirus known as OC43, one of the seven coronaviruses known to infect humans. It is one of the many viruses which cause what is called the "common cold." Scientists think there is convincing evidence that this virus was the cause of the 1890 Pandemic, causing disease comparable in severity to Covid-19. Now, constant exposure to this virus means that virtually everyone has immunity to this virus from birth. Now that the chance to eradicate the Covid-19 virus has passed, this may be what happens. (We can hope.) The vaccines, are a way to bootstrap this process, and have already saved hundreds of thousands of lives and facilitated a return to some approximation of normalcy. They are worth it. The safety and short-term effectiveness of the vaccines has been established. Obviously the long-term effectiveness of the vaccines is an unknown, given that they have only been in existence for about a year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 19, 2021, 11:52:13 AM
Quote from: aligreto on August 18, 2021, 02:24:21 PM
Ireland is only a small nation but we have always punched well above our weight, internationally. And so it is with Covid vaccinations. We currently stand second, behind Malta, in the EU in terms of uptake rate: https://www.irishpost.com/news/ireland-has-2nd-best-vaccine-uptake-in-european-union-218416

Good for Malta  :)

Good for Malta, but that "ranking" makes very little sense to me. It says 50.20 % for Finland. Are they saying only half of Finns have accepted offered Covid vaccines? That is not even remotely true! About 70 % of Finns have got the first dose and about 44 % the second dose. The vaccinations of 12-15 years have just started this month. The reason why second dose drags behind is because Finland adopted 12 week between the jabs. The amount of second doses is rising rapidly. Vaccine hesitation in Finland is low and and I'd say 80-90 % of those who have been offered it has taken it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 19, 2021, 11:33:34 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 19, 2021, 11:52:13 AM
Good for Malta, but that "ranking" makes very little sense to me. It says 50.20 % for Finland. Are they saying only half of Finns have accepted offered Covid vaccines? That is not even remotely true! About 70 % of Finns have got the first dose and about 44 % the second dose. The vaccinations of 12-15 years have just started this month. The reason why second dose drags behind is because Finland adopted 12 week between the jabs. The amount of second doses is rising rapidly. Vaccine hesitation in Finland is low and and I'd say 80-90 % of those who have been offered it has taken it.

Quote from: Que on August 19, 2021, 12:30:15 AM
It is an confusing (sloppy) article....
It keeps talking about vaccine acceptency, while in a actual fact these are the numbers for full vaccinations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 20, 2021, 01:00:31 AM
Quote from: Que on August 19, 2021, 12:30:15 AM
It is an confusing (sloppy) article....
It keeps talking about vaccine acceptency, while in a actual fact these are the numbers for full vaccinations.

But god job, Ireland!  :)

What is the point of articles like this? The relevant things are the availability of vaccines and vaccine acceptancy. This article manages to mix these together in a way that gives weird ranking for countries. Finland is doing vaccinations as fast as we can, as fast as we get vaccines and almost all people take it. The vaccines come from EU and all EU countries should get the exact same amount of vaccines per capita, but somehow countries like Ireland are ranked way higher than some other EU countries. What gives?

It looks like (as of 17th August) 72 % of people in Ireland has got at least one shot. In Finland this number is 69 %. What kind of sense does it then make to say the vaccine "uptake" in Ireland is 80.7 % and in Finland 50.2 % ? Yes, Ireland seems to be on of the best countries in vaccinations in Europe, I don't deny that, but Finland is not as far behind as this sloppy article makes it seem.

Just reacting critically to what I read. Below is the vaccination situation in Finland devided as age groups.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 20, 2021, 01:14:25 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 19, 2021, 09:14:32 AM
To put it in perspective, there is a Coronavirus known as OC43, one of the seven coronaviruses known to infect humans. It is one of the many viruses which cause what is called the "common cold." Scientists think there is convincing evidence that this virus was the cause of the 1890 Pandemic, causing disease comparable in severity to Covid-19. Now, constant exposure to this virus means that virtually everyone has immunity to this virus from birth. Now that the chance to eradicate the Covid-19 virus has passed, this may be what happens. (We can hope.) The vaccines, are a way to bootstrap this process, and have already saved hundreds of thousands of lives and facilitated a return to some approximation of normalcy. They are worth it. The safety and short-term effectiveness of the vaccines has been established. Obviously the long-term effectiveness of the vaccines is an unknown, given that they have only been in existence for about a year.

Is there anything accessible to someone who isn't a life scientist that I can read about this?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 20, 2021, 01:43:09 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/yd1QRfJ/Capture.jpg)

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/13august2021

Here is the latest data on incidence in the UK. You will see that we are up to over 100K cases a day. Hospital admissions is under control nonetheless, due to the vaccine. Admissions are stable apart from in hotspots, and that suggests to me that incidence is stable too - i.e. R is at around 1.

One interesting thing is that positive test cases are well under 1/3 of actual incidence. Probably symptoms of delta in vaccinated adults are less severe, so people don't get tested. Possibly people have deleted their contact tracing app, or are ignoring it, because incidence is so great. We are moving away from a system of generalised testing and contact tracing in fact -- the only people who will get tested are the ones with nasty symptoms.

In so far as Britain is trail blazing, this could well be the future for the world. That being said, it is anyone's guess how this will be effected by schools opening, autumn and winter, vaccine waning and new variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 20, 2021, 04:02:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 20, 2021, 01:14:25 AM
Is there anything accessible to someone who isn't a life scientist that I can read about this?

I forgot where I first read about it, maybe the Economist. It is mentioned here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1889–1890_pandemic#Coronavirus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1889%E2%80%931890_pandemic#Coronavirus)

It's a fairly speculative finding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 20, 2021, 04:53:16 AM
Some encouraging news (from CNN article, see link for complete article):

As Covid-19 hospitalizations increase, a greater number of Americans are deciding to get vaccinated

"More than 1 million doses of the vaccine were reported administered Thursday, new US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data showed, marking the first time since early July for the single-day change in reported doses. The average pace of those initiating vaccination is more than 70% higher than one month ago.
Oklahoma and Louisiana -- two states that have lagged the rest of the nation in vaccinations -- are now outpacing the national average, White House Covid-19 Response Team Chief of Staff Asma Mirza said in calls with local faith leaders Thursday.
"We're seeing a new willingness, a new openness to getting vaccinated," she said in a discussion with Louisiana faith leaders."

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/20/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 20, 2021, 05:16:38 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 20, 2021, 04:53:16 AM
Some encouraging news (from CNN article, see link for complete article):

As Covid-19 hospitalizations increase, a greater number of Americans are deciding to get vaccinated

"More than 1 million doses of the vaccine were reported administered Thursday, new US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data showed, marking the first time since early July for the single-day change in reported doses. The average pace of those initiating vaccination is more than 70% higher than one month ago.
Oklahoma and Louisiana -- two states that have lagged the rest of the nation in vaccinations -- are now outpacing the national average, White House Covid-19 Response Team Chief of Staff Asma Mirza said in calls with local faith leaders Thursday.
"We're seeing a new willingness, a new openness to getting vaccinated," she said in a discussion with Louisiana faith leaders."

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/20/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html

PD

Not exactly what this story reports from ol' Alabama... :-X


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/19/unvaccinated-alabama/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/19/unvaccinated-alabama/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 20, 2021, 05:47:26 AM
Quote from: André on August 20, 2021, 05:16:38 AM
Not exactly what this story reports from ol' Alabama... :-X


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/19/unvaccinated-alabama/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/19/unvaccinated-alabama/)
I can't read the W.P.  What is the gist of the article?

PD

p.s.  I know, the title of that CNN article is somewhat misleading.  I am happy about the turnaround in Louisiana and Oklahoma though.  Hopefully attitudes (and actions) are starting to change in Alabama.  🙏
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 20, 2021, 07:09:32 PM
Lest you think that nobody in Texas has any sense, this alert appeared on my phone today. Harris County Texas is Central Houston. (I live just over the boarder in Montgomery Country.)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 21, 2021, 12:44:37 AM
Another confirmation from here in DK: 95% of hospitalizations are those of non-vaccinated.

They've begun giving the 3rd jab for the elderly. In spite of Delta, the R-number has been only 1 for 4.5 weeks now.

Reports about further labels, succesful trials, and new generations of vaccines coming in.

The low number of vaccinations in poorer countries a continued matter of debate, since it also means an obvious space for the virus to continue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on August 21, 2021, 06:12:44 AM
The politics surrounding mask mandates and anti-mask mandates are really spiraling out of control in South Carolina (where I live).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 06:43:06 AM
Quote from: DavidW on August 21, 2021, 06:12:44 AM
The politics surrounding mask mandates and anti-mask mandates are really spiraling out of control in South Carolina (where I live).

Ayyup.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 21, 2021, 07:04:54 AM
I spoke to an ER nurse the other day and she said that the majority of cases of COVID that she has seen in the past 3-4 months have been those that are unvaccinated. A neighbor of mine who is also a nurse, but at a clinic and not a hospital, told me the same thing. So it does seem that skepticism about the efficiency of whether the the vaccine actually works or not seems to be slowly diminishing. In my own case, when COVID hits close to home, it makes one a lot more aware of the dangers of this virus and the reality we currently live in, so I really had no other option as avoidance couldn't last forever as Spotted Horses rightfully pointed out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 08:54:01 AM
University of Virginia disenrolls unvaccinated students ahead of fall semester — 8:49 a.m.
Washington Post

Forty-nine students who registered for fall classes at the University of Virginia have been disenrolled after failing to meet the school's vaccine mandate, officials said Friday.

The campus unveiled its vaccine mandate in May and the overwhelming majority of the campus is in compliance, officials said. More than 96 percent of U-Va. students are vaccinated against the coronavirus and 335 students with religious and medical exemptions have been granted permanent waivers, officials said.

An additional 184 temporary waivers were granted to students who have had trouble getting vaccinated but plan to get their shots upon arriving to campus.

Less than 1 percent of students enrolled — or 238 students — are not in compliance, "but only 49 of those students had actually selected courses, meaning that a good number of the remaining 189 may not have been planning to return to the university this fall at all, regardless of our vaccination policy," said Brian Coy, a school spokesman.

Students have until Aug. 25 to get into compliance and re-enroll for fall semester classes, Coy added. Students can also choose to return to campus in the spring, but only after meeting the vaccination requirement.

U-Va., along with hundreds of other campuses, unveiled its vaccine mandate for students in May. The university since then has sent students "multiple reminders" about the policy, Coy said in an email.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 08:54:41 AM
Hundreds arrested, fined during Australia lockdown protests — 6:50 a.m.
By The Associated Press

More than 250 people who were protesting coronavirus lockdowns in Australia were arrested Saturday and many faced fines for defying health orders, authorities said.

At least seven police officers were treated for injuries after skirmishes broke out at some of the protests, which took place in multiple cities nationwide. The largest and most violent protest was in Melbourne. Many were organized by people in encrypted online chat groups.

Sydney has been in lockdown for two months, while Melbourne and the capital, Canberra, went into lockdown earlier this month. Under the rules of the lockdown, people are mostly confined to their homes and have limits placed on their social interactions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 08:59:25 AM
Orlando urges residents to conserve water because of surge in covid hospitalizations
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 09:16:11 AM
A Texas GOP official's covid-19 death went viral. Then came calls for vaccination — and bitter divides.

By Hannah Knowles

Today at 8:01 a.m. EDT

When H. Scott Apley died at 45 of covid-19, he became a face of vaccine refusal by the political right. A GoFundMe drive for his wife and baby son drew scorn as the Dickinson City Council member's social media posts circulated.

"I wish I lived in the area!" the Houston-area member of the Texas Republican Party's governing board wrote this spring about a "mask burning" party in Cincinnati. "You are an absolute enemy of a free people," he once replied on Twitter to a doctor's post celebrating the effectiveness of Pfizer's shots against the coronavirus.

In the GOP circles where Apley was well known, however, there was little mention of covid-19 or how to prevent it. Two days after mourning their former vice chairman in a Facebook post that did not say what put him on a ventilator, the Galveston County Republican Party shared a far-right website's medical-evidence-free claim that immunization against the coronavirus had killed a young conservative activist. "Another tragedy - From the Vaccine!!!!!" they warned.

Apley's hospitalization and death showcased the bitterness of the country's divide over coronavirus vaccination, and over how to bridge it, as the pandemic makes personal tragedy inseparable from politics. The Dickinson, Tex., council member's community offers a stark counterpoint amid a slew of stories about people who urge others to get vaccinated after losing a skeptical loved one to covid-19.

In national news coverage and the online firestorm that followed, Apley was a lightning rod for the country's frustration as it struggles to bring the virus under control. To many, his fatal illness was a consequence of sometimes skeptical and even hostile GOP statements on immunization, as millions of eligible Americans — disproportionately Republican — have yet to get their first shots.

"Republican leaders are to blame for Apley's death," said one Houston man's letter to the editor in the Galveston County Daily News, as the highly transmissible delta variant fueled a new surge of coronavirus cases straining hospitals.

But for others who knew Apley, only one story mattered: His family was suffering, and now, with cruel comments and laughing emoji, strangers from out-of-state were piling on. In Apley's political sphere, some said the tragedy was only entrenching people's divisions over the vaccines and a resurging virus — much less sending people soul-searching about their beliefs or their party's messaging.

"Everyone already has an opinion, and it didn't change because of Scott," said Marco Roberts, the Houston-based chairman of the Log Cabin Republicans of Texas. In a Facebook post, he criticized those "seeking to make political points of [Apley's] death — as if his unique and anecdotal tragedy had anything to do with public policy that affects millions."

Karen Stoehr, who said she is Apley's sibling by adoption, also hated the use of Apley's death to make a public health point, even as she believes so strongly in the coronavirus vaccines that she won't let people see her 88-year-old dad without them. A full-time caretaker for her ailing father in small-town Kansas, Stoehr said she did not read all the news about her brother, stays away from politics and generally has "other things going on in my life."

She said she also does not know if Apley's death has swayed their sister, a teacher who she said has previously declined to get vaccinated and who did not return a call from The Post.

"They've been praying for a baby," Stoehr said of her brother and his wife, her voice starting to quiver. "They just got one. And then he's gone!"

Apley's wife, Melissa, declined to be interviewed or discuss her husband's decision-making but did not dispute people's belief that he was unvaccinated. She told The Post in text messages that her husband was only "against the government forcing people to get vaccinated."

She said he supported her choice to get the shot before he fell sick, something Apley's friends remembered her telling them and sharing on social media.

Melissa Apley said she also got the virus, as Americans learn to expect some level of "breakthrough" infections. But she recovered. She said she has reunited with her months-old son, who tested negative and does not show symptoms.

She said she forgives those who celebrated her husband's death.

"CONGRATULATIONS," read one shiny card sent to the city of Dickinson after Apley's death that echoed the worst of the online comments. "Guess the grim reaper got the last laugh," the card went on inside, adding a smiley face and welcoming "one more dead Republican."

Dickinson Mayor Sean Skipworth said the vitriol was "morally wrong" and probably not productive.

"'Hey, idiots, go get vaccinated,'" he said, as some use the phrase "compassion fatigue" to talk about people who refuse the vaccines. "I mean, I don't know what that is meant to accomplish." Many in Apley's party, under fire for their approach to covid-19, felt similarly.

"No one likes to be shouted into a different opinion," echoed Roberts of the Log Cabin Republicans. "And so when people start being shouted at and being accused and charged and, you know, besieged, the natural inclination is to ... circle the wagons."

Months of data show that those who get immunized are significantly less likely to get sick, and even less likely to go to the hospital or die from covid-19.

But Roberts focused on uncertainty as he posted about Apley's death.

"The truth is, we don't know that had Scott made different choices the outcome would have been any different for him," he told the Log Cabin Republicans of Texas' followers on social media, pointing later to breakthrough infections and underlying factors like Apley's weight.

Apley's friend Hank Dugie said he believes the most effective messaging on vaccines is "positive, upbeat, motivational" — encouraging but not judgmental. "We don't press people on getting vaccinated," said Dugie, who serves as mayor pro tem for League City, Tex., right next to Apley's town.

The coronavirus situation in Texas has only escalated since Apley's death. Doctors are pleading for help as the number of hospitalized covid-19 patients statewide approaches levels not seen since the winter. Dugie is chair of his county's covid-19 business task force and knows that the vast majority of people who fall seriously ill are unvaccinated.

Yet with Apley, he said, he feels no responsibility to "talk about how he died or why he died." He said he believes in sharing statistics, not emotional stories. "If anything," Dugie said, in the wake of Apley's death, "people have retreated into their own confirmation biases."

Dugie and others in Apley's political circles also rejected the idea that Republican leaders are to blame.

"It's not words that are killing people," said Dan Davis, a city councilman in Manvel, Tex.

"Both parties have had very unfortunate messaging at times," said Jared Robinson, a Republican state district court judge.

Asked about the Galveston County GOP's Facebook post claiming the vaccine killed someone, Dugie noted the group's chairman is a doctor and said, "I don't think it represents the party at all."

The county GOP chairman, Patrick McGinnis, said in an email that Republican leaders are anti-mandate, not anti-vaccine or anti-public health. He pointed to a Kaiser Family Foundation polling that shows vaccination rates varying by age, race and education, not just party. Among more than a dozen demographic groups broken out, however, Republicans had the lowest levels of immunization.

McGinnis said that he is vaccinated and encourages others to get their shots whenever they ask. He also said the Facebook post about the alleged vaccine death does not represent the party's "official position" and agreed there was no clear evidence for it.

But the physician said he does not want to intervene in his group's postings.

"Better to let people share their opinions and post articles, rather than try to be the Facebook policeman," he said.

Jeff Larson, an official with the Harris County Republican Party, said he believes that some leaders of local GOP groups are reflecting their base's views on vaccines or "don't want to tackle the issue directly for fear — for fear of alienating a large segment of the party."

"Certainly if you are a person in the United States today and you want to believe a conspiracy theory about vaccines ... you'll probably land in our party," he said.

The last time Larson saw Apley alive, he said, was at the funeral of Jeff LeBlanc, another man active in Texas Republican politics who died of covid-19. Before that, the coronavirus took Texan and Republican Liberty Caucus leader Dave Nalle.

Just a few days after Apley's death, 61-year-old Larson got his first shot — the timing was a coincidence, Larson said, it just took him awhile to make it in.

Vaccination rates in the United States have ticked up in recent weeks, public health officials say, as fears spike with the delta variant. Galveston County is no exception, according to the local health district. State data has it lagging a few percentage points behind the nation as a whole, with full vaccination for about 57 percent of the population 12 and over.

Officials urged holdouts to reconsider at last week's Dickinson City Council meeting, where the masked-up mayor read Apley's name at roll call and then waited six long seconds before moving on.

"He did his homework, he never came to a council meeting where he wasn't prepared," a fellow Councilman remembered at the meeting.

"It could have been prevented," another said. They knew Apley not as a thrower of online insults but as a nice guy immersed in local problems — on his city councilman Facebook page, he posted about a job fair, a driver's license renewal deadline and the safest way to thaw frozen pipes.

Skipworth, who said he grew up not knowing his birth father and felt for Apley's child, said the rhetoric around Apley's death scared him. "It's frightening for how we talk to each other in this country," he said.

"I'm vaccinated, my wife's vaccinated, my kid will get vaccinated when they approve it," Skipworth said, as children younger than 12 remain ineligible. "I think that's the way to prevent this and to get back to more of what we know normal life was. So please, please, do that."

"I'm not making a political statement," he continued. "It's not a mandate. It's not anything. It's not shaming. But please, please, do that."

Just to the west, Davis — the Manvel councilman — was maybe shifting, but not yet sold.

A father of two young children, Davis said that Apley's death was a reminder to be "responsible, so that I can be here for them." For 28-year-old Davis, responsibility means getting a coronavirus test if you feel sick, or isolating, or telling your close contacts about an infection. He said he worries about the long-term consequences of the vaccine even as he believes they have done "a tremendous amount of good."

Apley's death "challenged" his thinking, said Davis, a conservative who met Apley through the local political scene.

He talked with his wife afterward, and they wondered, "What do we do?" They are praying at the end of every day, he said, waiting to get the vaccine until they have some answer from God.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:31:34 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 08:54:41 AM
Sydney has been in lockdown for two months, while Melbourne and the capital, Canberra, went into lockdown earlier this month. Under the rules of the lockdown, people are mostly confined to their homes and have limits placed on their social interactions.

I'm flabbergasted that any sane, rational person supports these draconian restrictions. Honestly, I'd rather die from interacting with my family and friends than live 20 years confined to my home.  Time and again, it's the contemporary, irrational fear of death. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:37:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:31:34 AM
I'm flabbergasted that any sane, rational person supports these draconian restrictions. Honestly, I'd rather die from interacting with my family and friends than live 20 years confined to my home.  Time and again, it's the contemporary, irrational fear of death. ;D

I don't think so. You have to remember that politicians are all puppets of capital - that's where you have to look for the best explanation of what they do.

If you let people mix, lots of people will need hospital care, and they won't get it. When they see the health system failing, they will become scared. They won't go to work, they won't go out and spend money in shops. In short, capital will not grow like it should.

That is the reason for the lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:40:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:37:41 AM
I don't think so. You have to remember that politicians are all puppets of capital - that's where you have to look for the best explanation of what they do.

If you let people mix, lots of people will need hospital care, and they won't get it. When they see the health system failing, they will become scared. They won't go to work, they won't go out and spend money in shops. In short, capital will not grow like it should.

That is the reason for the lockdown.

I beg your pardon??? If people are mostly confined to their homes, how could they go out and spend money in shops???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:41:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:40:13 AM
I beg your pardon??? If people are mostly confined to their homes, how could they go out and spend money in shops???

Confining them to their homes is a short term measure. And they are not 100% confined, many go to work for example. Produce and consume.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:43:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:41:51 AM
Confining them to their homes is a short term measure.

The 2020 complete lockdown in Romania was from late March to late July, ie five full months --- do you call this a short term?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:49:48 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:41:51 AM
Produce and consume.

You give too much credit to classical capitalism. It's been long since dead and buried.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:52:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:43:35 AM
The 2020 complete lockdown in Romania was from late March to late July, ie five full months --- do you call this a short term?

Well it's better for capital than people cowering in their homes when they see that they are totally unprotected. But obviously neither is ideal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:53:40 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:49:48 AM
You give too much credit to classical capitalism. It's been long since dead and buried.

Well, any capitalism you like, Florestan's romantic capitalist salon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:00:46 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 09:53:40 AM
Well, non classical capitalism then, Florestan's romantic capitalist salon.

Good one, Howard! (it's Howard, right?) :D

Too bad WHO, CDC, lockdowns, masks and social distancing were completely unknown during the Black Death --- the history of the world would have been completely different...

Do you fear death?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 21, 2021, 10:13:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:00:46 AM
Good one, Howard! (it's Howard, right?) :D

Too bad WHO, CDC, lockdowns, masks and social distancing were completely unknown during the Black Death --- the history of the world would have been completely different...

Do you fear death?

There is a famous case of Black Death village self-quarantine, but at a later outbreak, in 1665-66, Eyam in Derbyshire. The local rector was an enlightened man and the village quarantine must have saved many lives, but also cost some in self-sacrifice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:16:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 21, 2021, 10:13:15 AM
There is a famous case of Black Death village self-quarantine, but at a later outbreak, in 1665, Eyam in Derbyshire. The local rector was an enlightened man and the village quarantine must have saved many lives, but also cost some in self-sacrifice.

Interesting! Source, please.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 10:30:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:00:46 AM


Do you fear death?


Not at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 21, 2021, 10:35:03 AM
Wikipedia Eyam is one, but short. Another not so scholarly one is Joanna Lumley's quick television series with travelling in parts of the UK, made recently. There's just a brief section about Eyam, but that's where I learned about it. No doubt more detailed sources exist too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 10:37:08 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:31:34 AM
I'm flabbergasted that any sane, rational person supports these draconian restrictions. Honestly, I'd rather die from interacting with my family and friends than live 20 years confined to my home.  Time and again, it's the contemporary, irrational fear of death. ;D

No sane, rational person takes this as confinement to one's home for 20 years. Hence, it isn't worth bothering with the rest of your post, is it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 10:39:02 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 09:43:35 AM
The 2020 complete lockdown in Romania was from late March to late July, ie five full months --- do you call this a short term?

another error: confusing Romania with Australia. Sleep it off, fella!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:49:20 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 10:39:02 AM
another error: confusing Romania with Australia. Sleep it off, fella!

Do you imply that Covid-19 acknowledges, and observes, borders and national differences?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 10:51:04 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 10:37:08 AM
No sane, rational person takes this as confinement to one's home for 20 years. Hence, it isn't worth bothering with the rest of your post, is it?

And yet, my dear Karl, you bothered to reply to it.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 21, 2021, 11:03:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 21, 2021, 10:30:24 AM

Not at all.

Well, I do. I wouldn't like to die tomorrow, or today at midnight, or any time soon --- I would like to live at least a hundred years. Yet I'm sure I will die not a second sooner or later than the time God allotted me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on August 21, 2021, 02:26:08 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on August 21, 2021, 07:04:54 AM
I spoke to an ER nurse the other day and she said that the majority of cases of COVID that she has seen in the past 3-4 months have been those that are unvaccinated.

Sadly enough I read an article that the unvaccinated blame everyone but themselves for the spread of the delta variant.  They mostly blame the Biden administration.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on August 21, 2021, 02:34:13 PM
Quote from: DavidW on August 21, 2021, 06:12:44 AM
The politics surrounding mask mandates and anti-mask mandates are really spiraling out of control in South Carolina (where I live).

This is my fear when sending my girls to school wearing masks in a state that has fully-supported legislation banning any mask mandates statewide. The social pressure and trickle-down political heckling towards children could be yet another aspect of bullying in schools where I live.

But we aren't going to take a chance with my daughter's existing lung issues even if the chances of her showing symptoms are low for her age group.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 02:46:07 PM
Quote from: VonStupp on August 21, 2021, 02:34:13 PM
This is my fear when sending my girls to school wearing masks in a state that has fully-supported legislation banning any mask mandates statewide. The social pressure and trickle-down political heckling towards children could be yet another aspect of bullying in schools where I live.

But we aren't going to take a chance with my daughter's existing lung issues even if the chances of her showing symptoms are low for her age group.

Warm wishes for you & yours!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on August 21, 2021, 04:03:00 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 02:46:07 PM
Warm wishes for you & yours!

Thank you! My character is about as a-political as they come, so I never thought I would ever be worried about political strife in concurrence with sending my kids to school.

VS
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 21, 2021, 04:08:15 PM
Quote from: VonStupp on August 21, 2021, 02:34:13 PM
This is my fear when sending my girls to school wearing masks in a state that has fully-supported legislation banning any mask mandates statewide. The social pressure and trickle-down political heckling towards children could be yet another aspect of bullying in schools where I live.

But we aren't going to take a chance with my daughter's existing lung issues even if the chances of her showing symptoms are low for her age group.

I'm not pro mask but not totally anti either. The standard blue/green ones simply do not work as numerous tests and experiments have shown and in my case exacerbate a medical condition that I have. That said, your post reminded me that I don't look at people who wear masks with scorn either as I don't know what underlying conditions they might have.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 21, 2021, 04:10:50 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 08:54:01 AM
University of Virginia disenrolls unvaccinated students ahead of fall semester — 8:49 a.m.
Washington Post

Forty-nine students who registered for fall classes at the University of Virginia have been disenrolled after failing to meet the school's vaccine mandate, officials said Friday.

The campus unveiled its vaccine mandate in May and the overwhelming majority of the campus is in compliance, officials said. More than 96 percent of U-Va. students are vaccinated against the coronavirus and 335 students with religious and medical exemptions have been granted permanent waivers, officials said.

An additional 184 temporary waivers were granted to students who have had trouble getting vaccinated but plan to get their shots upon arriving to campus.

Less than 1 percent of students enrolled — or 238 students — are not in compliance, "but only 49 of those students had actually selected courses, meaning that a good number of the remaining 189 may not have been planning to return to the university this fall at all, regardless of our vaccination policy," said Brian Coy, a school spokesman.

Students have until Aug. 25 to get into compliance and re-enroll for fall semester classes, Coy added. Students can also choose to return to campus in the spring, but only after meeting the vaccination requirement.

U-Va., along with hundreds of other campuses, unveiled its vaccine mandate for students in May. The university since then has sent students "multiple reminders" about the policy, Coy said in an email.

My university also has a vaccine mandate, though with exceptions for documented medical or religious reasons. Estimates on the percentage of the student population that is vaccinated range from 80% to 90%. There is also a mask mandate in effect indoors (currently).

But that's the end of the good news. The president has stated pointedly that the mask mandate is temporary and will be lifted soon. And after it has been lifted, we (professors) will not be allowed to require masks in our classrooms. There are also no plans for further testing of either students or faculty after classes begin a week from Monday. Nor are students confined to campus - they will be free to leave and roam around the state in their free time. We are in a county where the rate of community transmission is given by the CDC as HIGH.

:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 05:21:26 PM
Quote from: krummholz on August 21, 2021, 04:10:50 PM
My university also has a vaccine mandate, though with exceptions for documented medical or religious reasons. Estimates on the percentage of the student population that is vaccinated range from 80% to 90%. There is also a mask mandate in effect indoors (currently).

But that's the end of the good news. The president has stated pointedly that the mask mandate is temporary and will be lifted soon. And after it has been lifted, we (professors) will not be allowed to require masks in our classrooms. There are also no plans for further testing of either students or faculty after classes begin a week from Monday. Nor are students confined to campus - they will be free to leave and roam around the state in their free time. We are in a county where the rate of community transmission is given by the CDC as HIGH.

:(

Oof!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 21, 2021, 05:25:37 PM
Atop his reprehensible disinformation hucksterism is the "elective tragedy" of his at last seeing light, but not living to try to undo the harm he's done:

Conservative Radio Host Who Mocked Vaccines Dies of COVID-19 (https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservative-radio-host-phil-valentine-who-recorded-beatles-parody-about-vaccines-dies-from-coronavirus?ref=home)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 21, 2021, 07:28:44 PM
Quote from: DavidW on August 21, 2021, 02:26:08 PM
Sadly enough I read an article that the unvaccinated blame everyone but themselves for the spread of the delta variant.  They mostly blame the Biden administration.

Sad, indeed. We'll see how well it goes for them. My guess is COVID hasn't hit home for them (yet).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on August 21, 2021, 07:51:39 PM
Trump had a rally in Alabama this evening.
During his rant, he mentioned he had been vaccinated and urged everyone there to get vaccinated.

The audience responded by booing him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 21, 2021, 08:18:59 PM
Quote from: JBS on August 21, 2021, 07:51:39 PM
Trump had a rally in Alabama this evening.
During his rant, he mentioned he had been vaccinated and urged everyone there to get vaccinated.

The audience responded by booing him.

Apparently, they didn't boo enough. They should've thrown anything rotten at him they could get their hands on --- tomatoes, apples, bananas, etc. This man needs to go home and work on his hair. His political future is finished after the disgraceful stunt he pulled on January 6th.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 21, 2021, 09:15:05 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on August 21, 2021, 08:18:59 PM
Apparently, they didn't boo enough. They should've thrown anything rotten at him they could get their hands on --- tomatoes, apples, bananas, etc. This man needs to go home and work on his hair. His political future is finished after the disgraceful stunt he pulled on January 6th.

The people attending the rally probably dug January 6th and, if anything, think it didn't go far enough.  :'(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 21, 2021, 09:15:47 PM
"Audiatur et altera pars..."

https://twitter.com/alexkramers/status/1428784100463333380
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Christabel on August 21, 2021, 09:45:05 PM
Only in the USA.  Growing crazier by the minute.  Same goes for 'safe spaces' and all other forms of pathological altruism and consciousness-devouring over-protection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 22, 2021, 02:55:03 AM
Quote from: JBS on August 21, 2021, 07:51:39 PM
Trump had a rally in Alabama this evening.
During his rant, he mentioned he had been vaccinated and urged everyone there to get vaccinated.

The audience responded by booing him.
??? :o

Double-shock here on both accounts...less so on the booing.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 22, 2021, 03:13:35 AM
Quote from: JBS on August 21, 2021, 07:51:39 PM
Trump had a rally in Alabama this evening.
During his rant, he mentioned he had been vaccinated and urged everyone there to get vaccinated.

The audience responded by booing him.

As usual, the man is a day late and a dollar short, as the saying goes...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 22, 2021, 03:39:50 AM
Quote from: krummholz on August 22, 2021, 03:13:35 AM
As usual, the man is a day late and a dollar short, as the saying goes...

It is crazy and scary to think Trump might be back in the White House in Jan. 2025!  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 22, 2021, 06:27:54 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 21, 2021, 09:15:05 PM
The people attending the rally probably dug January 6th and, if anything, think it didn't go far enough.  :'(

Sad, but true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 22, 2021, 07:18:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 21, 2021, 09:15:05 PM
The people attending the rally probably dug January 6th and, if anything, think it didn't go far enough.  :'(

Just the problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 22, 2021, 08:05:35 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-22/radio-host-who-regretted-vaccine-hesitancy-dies-of-covid

If paywalled, should be able to find via Google.
An Associated Press story is cited, that should be easy to find.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 22, 2021, 11:30:39 AM
There's also the widely reported difficulty of filling jobs, especially in restaurants and retail. This phenomenon has persisted despite free vaccines and elevated pay scales. In fact, people are resigning at an elevated rate, leading some analysts to dub the current labor situation "the Great Resignation." Some of this is likely the result of unemployment benefits, but there seem to be deeper shifts underway in the labor market. It's also possible that service workers will come out of this with a little more bargaining power, and that many will do their best not to return to the sector.

On the white-collar end, permanent or at least medium-term changes to land use and commuting seem more and more likely, as some employers push back their September office reopenings and school closures rear their head again. Longer but less frequent commutes, or permanent work-from-home arrangements, already seem to be starting a new wave of growth at or beyond the exurban edge of major metro areas. In other words, our labor and economic issues are also land-use and transportation issues. Are cities prepared for this? Are communities caught between the urban core and exploding exurbs ready for it? A move might be temporary, but alterations in things like land use, tax revenues, and road capacity will cast a long shadow.

All of this and more—will handshakes survive? business travel?—is uncertain. A return to "normal" may still be possible, even if it isn't quite a snapback. But many people have been forced to rethink, or had the opportunity to rethink, their careers, their salary requirements, their family time, and their true needs. It's one thing to do what you've always done; it's another thing to go back to that after seeing what else is possible.

Remember the narrative earlier this year that summer might be mostly normal, but that fall would likely be difficult? (Turns out, that simply happened a month or two earlier than predicted, with the current Delta wave.) My wife and I were at a crab-leg buffet in Virginia Beach on Memorial Day weekend, when Virginia followed updated CDC guidance and essentially lifted all public health precautions. The restaurant was filled to capacity and there was a line out the door. Whatever the virus does later this year, it will be very, very hard to stuff that sense of liberation back in the bottle.

The Great Unsettledness, Revisited (https://www.thebulwark.com/the-great-unsettledness-revisited/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 22, 2021, 11:31:42 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 22, 2021, 08:05:35 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-22/radio-host-who-regretted-vaccine-hesitancy-dies-of-covid (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-22/radio-host-who-regretted-vaccine-hesitancy-dies-of-covid)

If paywalled, should be able to find via Google.
An Associated Press story is cited, that should be easy to find.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 21, 2021, 05:25:37 PM
Atop his reprehensible disinformation hucksterism is the "elective tragedy" of his at last seeing light, but not living to try to undo the harm he's done:

Conservative Radio Host Who Mocked Vaccines Dies of COVID-19 (https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservative-radio-host-phil-valentine-who-recorded-beatles-parody-about-vaccines-dies-from-coronavirus?ref=home)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 22, 2021, 01:26:15 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 22, 2021, 03:39:50 AM
It is crazy and scary to think Trump might be back in the White House in Jan. 2025!  ???

If you keep talking about him he will be. Trump doesn't care what press he gets, as long as he keeps getting it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 22, 2021, 03:05:44 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 22, 2021, 01:26:15 PM
If you keep talking about him he will be. Trump doesn't care what press he gets, as long as he keeps getting it.

Very true !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 22, 2021, 05:30:42 PM
Mass. grapples with whether to adopt new restrictions; US weekly COVID infections surpass 1 million amid Delta surge

By Globe staff Updated August 22, 2021, 1 hour ago
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 22, 2021, 05:33:48 PM
Forecasters offer grim fall outlook on COVID-19, with deaths predicted to rise in Mass.

By Kay Lazar Globe Staff,Updated August 21, 2021, 6:29 p.m.

Another season lost to pandemic may lie ahead.

Two separate disease forecasting teams are predicting that COVID-19 deaths will rise in Massachusetts and across the country for weeks to come, as the grim flood of new infections and steady rise in hospitalizations that began around July 4 continues.

Meanwhile, a third forecasting team has acknowledged that the ongoing surge is even stronger than they predicted only a few weeks ago based on early July data because they had underestimated the contagiousness of the Delta strain of the virus.

But the extremity of the COVID surge's high-water mark, and how quickly Massachusetts turns the tide, depends on choices about wearing masks and getting vaccinated that can mean the difference between life and death, several disease trackers said.


It isn't looking as though I can make a case for the church choir getting together in September.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on August 22, 2021, 07:37:49 PM
Meanwhile in my state of Florida, the one week total of deaths last week exceeded the worst week of 2020
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1428875158337556483
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 22, 2021, 07:59:25 PM
Quote from: JBS on August 22, 2021, 07:37:49 PM
Meanwhile in my state of Florida, the one week total of deaths last week exceeded the worst week of 2020
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1428875158337556483

And the GOP is surely undercounting the deaths, so the situation is likely worse than the numbers indicate.

But they've undercounted all along, so we're making inferences from a somewhat fake time series!
Perhaps the undercount was less severe in 2020? There was that whistleblowing state scientist who got fired midway through 2020 - Rebekah Jones - I didn't keep track of what happened to her.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 22, 2021, 10:38:41 PM
Quote from: Que on July 22, 2021, 04:14:07 PM

Further spreading of the Delta variant:

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w28_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=3-TASo7s)

Meanwhile in Europe, despite ongoing vaccinations things are still not looking better on the spreading of the virus:


(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w32_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=sg8xeTWN)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 12:34:35 AM
Quote from: Que on August 22, 2021, 10:38:41 PM
Meanwhile in Europe, despite ongoing vaccinations things are still not looking better on the spreading of the virus:


(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w32_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=sg8xeTWN)

The spread will become less important as population immunity is increasing.

The one everyone should be watching now is Scotland, their schools opened last week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 01:11:05 AM
I love Scotland, but I think that is mainly relevant for UK residents and travellers. Their vaccination rate and school situation is not unique.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 01:13:56 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 01:11:05 AM
I love Scotland, but I think that is mainly relevant for UK residents and travellers. Their vaccination rate and school situation is not unique.

No but I was assuming the early opening of schools is unique. So it will allow us to see the consequences of opening schools in a vaccinated population with delta circulating. Or have other countries with a high level of vaccination already opened schools?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 01:53:25 AM
Here for example schools started 2 weeks ago!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 03:25:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 01:53:25 AM
Here for example schools started 2 weeks ago!

Ah! And has the incidence of the disease changed as a result?

What measures are you taking in schools to reduce transmission? Is there special air testing and  purification equipment?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 23, 2021, 05:35:55 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-21/fda-issues-you-are-not-a-cow-warning-after-livestock-drug-use

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a strong and unusual warning on Saturday: "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it."

The FDA was reacting to alarms from Mississippi, the state with the worst outbreak in the U.S., that people have been taking ivermectin to treat or prevent Covid-19. The drug is often used against parasites in livestock.

...

An FDA warning said that ivermectin "is not an anti-viral" and that "taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm." Though most often used in animals, the FDA said the drug has been approved in smaller doses in humans to treat two conditions caused by parasitic worms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 23, 2021, 05:43:48 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 23, 2021, 05:35:55 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-21/fda-issues-you-are-not-a-cow-warning-after-livestock-drug-use (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-21/fda-issues-you-are-not-a-cow-warning-after-livestock-drug-use)

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a strong and unusual warning on Saturday: "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it."

The FDA was reacting to alarms from Mississippi, the state with the worst outbreak in the U.S., that people have been taking ivermectin to treat or prevent Covid-19. The drug is often used against parasites in livestock.

...

An FDA warning said that ivermectin "is not an anti-viral" and that "taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm." Though most often used in animals, the FDA said the drug has been approved in smaller doses in humans to treat two conditions caused by parasitic worms.


Maybe they are cows. Nah, cows are brighter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 23, 2021, 05:48:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 23, 2021, 05:43:48 AM
Maybe they are cows. Nah, cows are brighter.

No doubt the same dumbasses who call the vaccinated "sheeple".  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 23, 2021, 06:54:32 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 23, 2021, 05:48:25 AM
No doubt the same dumbasses who call the vaccinated "sheeple".  :laugh:

I'm telling you that whenever these people are lying in an ICU bed or someone they love or care about is, they'll think twice before they call those who want to protect themselves (and others) "sheeple". As I've said, once this virus hits home, it's a completely different story.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:42:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 03:25:09 AM
Ah! And has the incidence of the disease changed as a result?

What measures are you taking in schools to reduce transmission? Is there special air testing and  purification equipment?

Sorry, rather local info, but:

There's been an increase in hospitalizations since the early summer, and maybe from 90 to 131 (today) during the latest month or so. But the positive percentage of those tested has been between 1 - 1.8 for quite a lot of weeks, typically 750 - 1150 a day. So not really an alarming growth rate so far. The R number has likewise been calculated as 1.0 for more than a month.

They expect the number to go up in autumn however; at a big press conference today, the government said a lot of stuff, including: the virus is thriving almost only among the non-vaccinated. 75% of the population except the youngest children has had vaccines, but only half of the children between 12-18 years, and it's essential that more children and young people get the vaccine, to stop the virus.

They're hoping for 90% of the population above 12 years on October 1st.

95% of hospitalizations are non-vaccinated; 51% of hospitalizations are now people younger than 40. Without a vaccination, it's basically impossible not to get an infection one way or the other from now on, due to Delta, which is 95% of infections.

But they also said that big lockdowns, like the two national, long-lasting ones we already had, are unlikely to be repeated. They are considering whether the virus status as that of a national emergency epidemic can be downgraded, and replaced by a stated policy of local tools in stead. Everyone will be offered a third jab, starting with the fragile cases. Results from a Danish vaccine, Bavarian Nordic, are highly promising also in relation to Delta, a government support of 100 mio Euros for it has been approved by the EU, and then immediately given. Economy is basically recovering and experiencing a big boost, the number of employed is higher than ever, etc.

I'm not sure about measures in schools, they aren't that dramatic I think, but there are some principles about distance indoors at least. Also, you are to quarantine if a person close to you socially gets tested positive. I haven't heard about any measuring of air/ventilation quality anywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 23, 2021, 11:51:37 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/23/covid-dr-scott-gottlieb-says-delta-covid-surge-in-south-has-peaked-.html

Hasn't peaked in my county (Ulster Co., NY). Today's graph suggests that the next 2-4 weeks will give a critical indication of where we're heading:

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 23, 2021, 01:12:25 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:42:15 AM
Sorry, rather local info, but:

There's been an increase in hospitalizations since the early summer, and maybe from 90 to 131 (today) during the latest month or so. But the positive percentage of those tested has been between 1 - 1.8 for quite a lot of weeks, typically 750 - 1150 a day. So not really an alarming growth rate so far. The R number has likewise been calculated as 1.0 for more than a month.

Our PM has strongly suggested that it's not cases that should be reported but hospitalisations and that makes perfect sense. What should also be reported is those hospitalised who are not vaccinated. I can find this information on Govt health websites but rarely in the media. I am assuming that those of you who are posting that type of data are doing the same and using figures from official websites.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 01:28:36 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:42:15 AM

but only half of the children between 12-18 years, and it's essential that more children and young people get the vaccine, to stop the virus.


This is the main difference between the policies in the Uk and the policies in Denmark. We're offering vaccines to kids over 15, and to those under 15 if they're vulnerable in some way.

(Thanks for such a full and interesting reply, by the way!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 01:37:29 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:42:15 AM
Sorry, rather local info, but:

There's been an increase in hospitalizations since the early summer, and maybe from 90 to 131 (today) during the latest month or so. But the positive percentage of those tested has been between 1 - 1.8 for quite a lot of weeks, typically 750 - 1150 a day. So not really an alarming growth rate so far. The R number has likewise been calculated as 1.0 for more than a month.


That's a growth of admissions of about 50%. There must have been a significant increase in incidence over the past few weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 05:05:54 PM
They're calling it
'a current epidemic among the non-vaccinated': 77% of registered new infections are among non-vaccinated, and 95% of hospitalizations as said, but obviously, the number of vaccinated has also gone up in the meantime. Delta is also said to perhaps give a tougher sickness than some previous variants, among non- vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 05:10:38 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 23, 2021, 01:12:25 PM
Our PM has strongly suggested that it's not cases that should be reported but hospitalisations and that makes perfect sense. What should also be reported is those hospitalised who are not vaccinated. I can find this information on Govt health websites but rarely in the media. I am assuming that those of you who are posting that type of data are doing the same and using figures from official websites.

The info is extracted from the press here in DK, including their daily summaries / presentation of
government statistics. I can only be satisfied with the level of information here. We only have two tabloids, and from what I've seen, one of them is reasonable, the other one I never check. As for TV, there are two stations, and good info is on their websites, they don't really focus on daily variations when live.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 06:17:41 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 23, 2021, 01:12:25 PM
Our PM has strongly suggested that it's not cases that should be reported but hospitalisations and that makes perfect sense.

???

No it doesn't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 23, 2021, 07:03:41 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 06:17:41 PM
???

No it doesn't.

Care to explain why???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 07:12:59 PM
There's no way to get a "live" view on the number of cases each day. Clearly the number of positive test results is not the same thing. The statistical work to get some perception of the extent of incidence of the disease tends to be a week behind at best.


There is something else. The Uk thinks we can and must live with high incidence, and that the health provision will cope. From that point of view hospitalisations are a red flag, incidence is secondary. The Israel model seems to be different, much less tolerant of high case numbers.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 07:14:12 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 23, 2021, 07:03:41 PM
Care to explain why???

Reporting numbers of cases in the community *should* lead to greater vigilance and a sense of the seriousness and time frame of the problem...and of the risk of future hospitalizations.

Not reporting is saying "Crisis? What Crisis?" And misrepresenting the risk and the status of the pandemic.

I would have thought that was obvious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 07:15:37 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 07:14:12 PM
Reporting numbers of cases in the community *should* lead to greater vigilance and a sense of the seriousness and time frame of the problem...and of the risk of future hospitalizations.

Not reporting is saying "Crisis? What Crisis?" And misrepresenting the risk and the status of the pandemic.

I would have thought that was obvious.

But case numbers aren't themselves serious. Serious cases, people who need hospital care, is. And that number is very much reduced in a vaccinated population, and low in younger people anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 07:22:20 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 07:15:37 PM
But case numbers aren't themselves serious. Serious cases, people who need hospital care, is. And that number is very much reduced in a vaccinated population, and low in younger people anyway.

That's true only of a population vaccinated at a peak level.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on August 23, 2021, 07:49:12 PM
Florida hospitalizations from March 2020 through today
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 23, 2021, 10:20:47 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 07:22:20 PM
That's true only of a population vaccinated at a peak level.

I've got to agree with Howard regardless of vaccination levels. When you get 97 out of 100 cases, say, that are very mild and require no medical intervention there really isn't an issue. We don't and haven't done this with influenza in
the past (think back to swine flu in 2009) and that was just as infectious as the Delta strain is now. The other point to remember is that only a proportion of all Covid cases are actually recorded making the 'case' data incredibly inaccurate. This would not be the case for hospital admissions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 10:48:19 PM
I don't understand what your strategy is here. Let's say you only observe hospitalization figures and observe that the hospitals are beyond capacity with covid cases and have no beds left for heart attack or stroke victims. Then what? How is this a strategy of any kind?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:54:04 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 07:12:59 PM
There's no way to get a "live" view on the number of cases each day. Clearly the number of positive test results is not the same thing. The statistical work to get some perception of the extent of incidence of the disease tends to be a week behind at best.
(...)

It partly depends on the amount of testing, which is a big thing and free here in DK. There's been 41 mio PCR and a lot of quick tests too, amounting to 7 PCR per inhabitant, and then many quick tests as well. Results are from day to day, including I think national results. Also, in many parts of educational and work life, regular testing is obligatory or very strongly recommended, therefore picturing the infections at some level at least; children and students tend to come from all parts of society.

That said, the number of tests has gone down in the later months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 23, 2021, 11:22:24 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on August 23, 2021, 12:34:35 AM
The spread will become less important as population immunity is increasing.

It's a sign that efforts aimed at containment (not by the UK...) are not (sufficiently) succesful.

Why is this important? There are still a lot of unvaccinated that now run an increased risk of coming into contact with the virus. Plus the vaccine seems less effective and lasting with the elderly and practically ineffective on people with a compromised immune system. And then there are some countries that still have a low vaccination rate, like Bulgaria (bottom of the list) which switched from green to dark red on the map. Is Romania next?  ::)

Last but not least: an increased presence of the virus in a (largely) vaccinated population increases the chance of resistant variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 24, 2021, 12:33:37 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 23, 2021, 10:48:19 PM
I don't understand what your strategy is here. Let's say you only observe hospitalization figures and observe that the hospitals are beyond capacity with covid cases and have no beds left for heart attack or stroke victims. Then what? How is this a strategy of any kind?

...this is somewhat specious. Both your country and mine have no issues with hospitals being over capacity and are highly unlikely to. The reason for this is quite simply that 98% of cases are mild or asymptomatic and don't require medical treatment. It's when the medical intervention figure rises, as opposed to the number of cases, that you know you have a problem.

When I see a headline like this - 'Middlemore Staffer Tests Positive' and then read further on that this person was not symptomatic and I am thinking, what is the point of this headline except to both sensationalise and spread misinformation. It's fear mongering and I'll bet that there are a whole raft of people out there who mistakenly think "If I get Covid 19 I'll die" because of how the media has covered the pandemic

Once again, I'll go back to the number of reported cases as opposed to the real number of cases. The reported cases must be far lower than what is actually out there in the community. This means that the 'reported' cases give a false picture of what is happening which the media are happy to play up. A UNSW study last year suggested that the number of reported cases as a opposed to all cases could be as low as 20%. That could be as high as 80% undetected. It makes sense. If you don't get tested or are asymptomatic and don't know you have covid then you don't become part of the statistics. If you get seriously sick and need medical help or hospitalisation then this will give us a reasonably accurate picture of what percentage of the population is at risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 24, 2021, 12:51:16 AM
I don't know what's happening where you are but here during this current lockdown we are trying to make the "reported cases" and "what is actually out there in the community" to be one and the same thing with aggressive tracing and testing. I don't know why you would think a 20/80 thing acceptable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 24, 2021, 01:27:12 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 23, 2021, 10:54:04 PM
It partly depends on the amount of testing, which is a big thing and free here in DK. There's been 41 mio PCR and a lot of quick tests too, amounting to 7 PCR per inhabitant, and then many quick tests as well. Results are from day to day, including I think national results. Also, in many parts of educational and work life, regular testing is obligatory or very strongly recommended, therefore picturing the infections at some level at least; children and students tend to come from all parts of society.

That said, the number of tests has gone down in the later months.

In the UK during most of the epidemic positive test results were about 50% of the best estimates of incidence. However, when the disease really took off and the population felt safe because of vaccination, people tested less and less. I guess they didn't see the need, and weren't convinced that isolation was necessary any more. As a result, right now, positive test results is running at 33% or less of incidence. Incidence is at about 100K a day, tested positives hovering around 30K a day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 24, 2021, 01:33:20 AM
Quote from: Que on August 23, 2021, 11:22:24 PM
It's a sign that efforts aimed at containment (not by the UK...) are not (sufficiently) succesful.


The only EU country I follow closely is France. There Macron's strategy seems to be to get to the same position as the UK fast! I mean, constrain unvaccinated people's freedoms radically to make them see the way the truth and the light. And when they are vaccinated well, they can party like it's 1999!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 24, 2021, 03:13:26 AM
Quote from: JBS on August 23, 2021, 07:49:12 PM
Florida hospitalizations from March 2020 through today
Eek!

How are things right where you live JBS?

I have friends who have a second home on Sanibel Island and the numbers were extremely low there last year (during the winter and early spring).  I'll have to ask them what their current thoughts are about returning there this coming winter.  I expect it will be a case of "Play it by ear".  I know that they love going there:  both birders and hate the cold.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 24, 2021, 03:43:17 AM

Another aspect of mapping the virus is sewage testing, which is apparently quicker at discovering outbreak centres, and involves much less hazzle. They're working on it here, and it might be a future international phenomena too.

In spite of somewhat increasing hospitalizations here in DK, the weekly published R number today is now down to 0.9 . I guess we'll see it during the coming week, if that's measurably correct.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on August 24, 2021, 03:52:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 24, 2021, 03:13:26 AM
Eek!

How are things right where you live JBS?

I have friends who have a second home on Sanibel Island and the numbers were extremely low there last year (during the winter and early spring).  I'll have to ask them what their current thoughts are about returning there this coming winter.  I expect it will be a case of "Play it by ear".  I know that they love going there:  both birders and hate the cold.

PD

My area is one of the "hot spots". Most people wear masks and are vaccinated (74% over 12 years old have at least one shot) but the hospitals are still crowded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 24, 2021, 03:57:11 AM
Quote from: JBS on August 24, 2021, 03:52:03 AM
My area is one of the "hot spots". Most people wear masks and are vaccinated (74% over 12 years old have at least one shot) but the hospitals are still crowded.
Sorry to hear that it's a "hot spot".  How has this effected your life in terms of going out/doing things?  I believe that you are close to the beach (or am I misremembering this due to your attached photo)?  Do you dine outdoors much or unwilling to try visiting restaurants?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on August 24, 2021, 06:37:00 AM
Hospitalizations lag behind reported cases by 1-4 weeks. Knowing the trend of new cases helps figure needs and potential problems in the health system. That's the essence of planning. Not knowing an uptick in new cases would mean the risk of being caught by surprise. That's why there are hurricane or tornado warnings.

Also, not being aware of an increase in cases raises the incredulity level of the population (the unvaccinated in particular) when authorities decree constraining measures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 24, 2021, 10:55:25 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/entire-texas-town-essentially-closes-130700273.html

Iraan, a small oilfield town of 1,200 people in west Texas, has been struck so hard by the coronavirus pandemic that the entire town has essentially shut down, including the school district and local businesses.

"We had had COVID before, but never to this magnitude," resident Vicky Zapata told CNN.

According to Iraan General Hospital CEO Jason Rybolt, 119 people were tested for the virus and 50 tested positive during a two week August span – a 42% positivity rate. Iraan Mayor Darren Brown told CNN, "This is very serious."

Rybolt said he's "very concerned for the community and "very concerned for trying to make sure that they have the health care that they need."

Rybolt added that at least one Iraan resident has been airlifted for out-of-state care because of a lack of available ICU beds in Texas. He said: "It could be 12 hours (for coronavirus-stricken people to receive a bed). It could be 36 hours. You just never know how long it's going to take."

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has continued to push against a statewide mask mandate, as many U.S. states have. The number of ICU beds available across all of Texas has been extremely low; only 372 are available now, according to the latest state data. The closest hospitals to Iraan are at least 100 miles away.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 24, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/televangelist-claims-god-cant-hear-prayers-through-masks-287346/

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 24, 2021, 12:43:49 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 24, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/televangelist-claims-god-cant-hear-prayers-through-masks-287346/



There's no bottom for televangelists, either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 24, 2021, 01:25:59 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 24, 2021, 12:51:16 AM
I don't know what's happening where you are but here during this current lockdown we are trying to make the "reported cases" and "what is actually out there in the community" to be one and the same thing with aggressive tracing and testing. I don't know why you would think a 20/80 thing acceptable.

Unless every single person is tested, it's impossible to get an accurate picture of the number of cases. Part of the UNSW (if it wasn't them it was some other Sydney Uni) was a survey of those who had never been tested and why this was so. This was apparently matched to another survey group who had also avoided testing but ended up being obliged to do so because of close contact, etc. The differences in the two figures was too large to be ignored.

The bottom line is that getting tested is about compliance and there are many factors standing in the way of that, even for those citizens who would normally comply. For example, the prospect of loss of income if self employed is just one factor that would preclude some people from getting the test, even if they aren't well. I have never been tested for one simple reason, I have never shown any Covid19 symptoms. Before you criticise me for that, public advice from the Qld government (and governments everywhere I would think) is to go and get tested "if you show any of the following symptoms......".

That begs the question "Have I had Covid19?" The answer is possibly yes as the odds are reasonable that I might have. I work in an environment comprising 130 adults and 1500+ children. I work in close proximity to the children I teach some of whom are as young as seven years old. I touch the surfaces they touch, I breathe the air that they breathe and so on. It is highly likely that some of those children have had Covid 19 but being asymptomatic were never tested and of course, will never figure in the list of cases.

Your government is "trying to make the "reported cases" and "what is actually out there in the community" to be one and the same thing". They are dreaming - though I would be tempted to say that they are bullshitting you. They know it's impossible so why propagate the lie?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 24, 2021, 04:09:58 PM
Quote from: Holden on August 24, 2021, 01:25:59 PM
They are dreaming

We shall see. Watch this space.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 24, 2021, 04:41:13 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-24/vaccine-efficacy-diminished-as-delta-arose-cdc-report-shows

Some passages:

The effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines among front-line workers declined to 66% after the delta variant became dominant, compared with 91% before it arose, according to a report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
...
The findings echo earlier evidence from Israel and the U.K. suggesting Covid vaccines lost some potency in preventing infections over time as the delta variant spread. These and other research results will be under scrutiny next week as CDC advisers weigh the Biden administration's plan to administer booster doses to most vaccine recipients in the U.S.
...
The finding of diminished effectiveness when delta was the dominant virus strain comes with an important caveat: The range of that estimate is highly uncertain. Researchers reported 95% confidence that the efficacy was between 26% and 84% in that period.
...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 24, 2021, 07:35:31 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 24, 2021, 04:41:13 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-24/vaccine-efficacy-diminished-as-delta-arose-cdc-report-shows

Some passages:

The effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines among front-line workers declined to 66% after the delta variant became dominant, compared with 91% before it arose, according to a report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
...
The findings echo earlier evidence from Israel and the U.K. suggesting Covid vaccines lost some potency in preventing infections over time as the delta variant spread. These and other research results will be under scrutiny next week as CDC advisers weigh the Biden administration's plan to administer booster doses to most vaccine recipients in the U.S.
...
The finding of diminished effectiveness when delta was the dominant virus strain comes with an important caveat: The range of that estimate is highly uncertain. Researchers reported 95% confidence that the efficacy was between 26% and 84% in that period.
...

You've got to be so careful with articles like that as the journalists make scary headlines to create clicks, and present things in a black and white way without context for similar reasons. In the case of that article, the issue is between vaccine effectiveness at preventing infection versus effectiveness at preventing other things like serious symptoms.

Suppose it were the case (as it appears to be) that the vaccines prevent serious illness, how much does it matter that they are less effective at preventing infection? Does it matter enough to justify a booster shot? When the South is unvaccinated.

These are the questions we should all be focussing on. Instead the pundits seem to be intent in creating pressure from below for a third jab in rich countries, for arguably no good reason whatsoever. In the meantime there's carnage in poor countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 25, 2021, 12:47:32 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 24, 2021, 04:09:58 PM
We shall see. Watch this space.

I think that I'll be watching for a long time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 25, 2021, 05:07:48 AM
Whaddaya mean, "inconclusive?!" The YouTube conspiracy theory pushers are CERTAIN!

Biden receives inconclusive intelligence report on covid origins (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/24/covid-origins-biden-intelligence-review/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 25, 2021, 08:53:02 AM
Quote from: Holden on August 24, 2021, 01:25:59 PM
Unless every single person is tested, it's impossible to get an accurate picture of the number of cases. Part of the UNSW (if it wasn't them it was some other Sydney Uni) was a survey of those who had never been tested and why this was so. This was apparently matched to another survey group who had also avoided testing but ended up being obliged to do so because of close contact, etc. The differences in the two figures was too large to be ignored.

The bottom line is that getting tested is about compliance and there are many factors standing in the way of that, even for those citizens who would normally comply. For example, the prospect of loss of income if self employed is just one factor that would preclude some people from getting the test, even if they aren't well. I have never been tested for one simple reason, I have never shown any Covid19 symptoms. Before you criticise me for that, public advice from the Qld government (and governments everywhere I would think) is to go and get tested "if you show any of the following symptoms......".

That begs the question "Have I had Covid19?" The answer is possibly yes as the odds are reasonable that I might have. I work in an environment comprising 130 adults and 1500+ children. I work in close proximity to the children I teach some of whom are as young as seven years old. I touch the surfaces they touch, I breathe the air that they breathe and so on. It is highly likely that some of those children have had Covid 19 but being asymptomatic were never tested and of course, will never figure in the list of cases.

Your government is "trying to make the "reported cases" and "what is actually out there in the community" to be one and the same thing". They are dreaming - though I would be tempted to say that they are bullshitting you. They know it's impossible so why propagate the lie?

An eminently reasonable post.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 25, 2021, 09:40:42 AM
Delta Air Lines will require any employee who is unvaccinated to pay an additional $200 per month to stay on the company's health care plan starting Nov. 1. Unvaccinated workers have to wear masks and will soon have to take weekly coronavirus tests.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 25, 2021, 09:58:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 25, 2021, 09:40:42 AM
Delta Air Lines will require any employee who is unvaccinated to pay an additional $200 per month to stay on the company's health care plan starting Nov. 1. Unvaccinated workers have to wear masks and will soon have to take weekly coronavirus tests.
I trust that they will make exceptions for those who health-wise cannot get vaccinated (in terms of being able to stay on the company's health plan)?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 25, 2021, 10:17:36 AM
Sooner or later the constitutions of the democratic nations will have to be ammended in order to ensure that nobody shall be discriminated on the basis of their religion, race, sexual orientation or vaccination status.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 25, 2021, 03:03:09 PM
https://fortwaynesnbc.com/2021/08/25/wisconsin-lawmaker-with-covid-19-on-ventilator-stable/

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Republican state senator from Wisconsin who opposed mask and vaccine mandates and then developed pneumonia after testing positive for COVID-19 is in stable condition after being placed on a ventilator. State Sen. Andre Jacque tested positive for COVID-19 earlier this month and was hospitalized Aug. 16.

https://news.yahoo.com/florida-is-the-only-state-where-more-people-are-dying-of-covid-now-than-ever-before-what-went-wrong-090001893.html

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 25, 2021, 03:22:07 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on August 25, 2021, 09:58:38 AM
I trust that they will make exceptions for those who health-wise cannot get vaccinated (in terms of being able to stay on the company's health plan)?

PD

One hopes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 25, 2021, 06:29:18 PM
I just learned that my brother, sister-in-law and nephew all have COVID and will be quarantining for the next two weeks. I don't know wether he or his wife have received vaccines, but I'll be honest here and say, while I don't like to hear of anyone's sickness, I'm not close to him nor am I particularly close to my sister (who is doing much better now). I haven't seen either one of them in years. A large division in my family remains and I honestly don't see it changing any time in the future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on August 26, 2021, 03:24:52 AM
Hungary: Baton raised, orchestra conductor gets vaccine shot


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hungary-baton-raised-orchestra-conductor-gets-vaccine-shot/ar-AANLwhl?ocid=msedgntp (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hungary-baton-raised-orchestra-conductor-gets-vaccine-shot/ar-AANLwhl?ocid=msedgntp)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 26, 2021, 03:36:11 AM
Quote from: Szykneij on August 26, 2021, 03:24:52 AM
Hungary: Baton raised, orchestra conductor gets vaccine shot


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hungary-baton-raised-orchestra-conductor-gets-vaccine-shot/ar-AANLwhl?ocid=msedgntp (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hungary-baton-raised-orchestra-conductor-gets-vaccine-shot/ar-AANLwhl?ocid=msedgntp)
Way to go Maestro Fischer and orchestra!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 26, 2021, 04:59:14 AM
Warnings About the Sturgis Rally Have Come Tragically True

Jasleen Arneja
Maia Majumder
Published Aug. 26, 2021 4:56AM ET

In western South Dakota's Meade County, more than one in three COVID-19 tests are currently returning positive, and over the last three weeks, seven-day average case counts have increased by 3,400 percent. This exponential growth in cases is likely attributable to the 81st Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, which drew an estimated half a million visitors to Meade County and its environs from Aug. 6 through 15, potentially acting as a superspreader event.

n western South Dakota's Meade County, more than one in three COVID-19 tests are currently returning positive, and over the last three weeks, seven-day average case counts have increased by 3,400 percent. This exponential growth in cases is likely attributable to the 81st Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, which drew an estimated half a million visitors to Meade County and its environs from Aug. 6 through 15, potentially acting as a superspreader event.

The pandemic is surging nationally, not just proximal to biker chaos in South Dakota. Defined in large part by the emergence of the highly transmissible Delta variant, the United States is experiencing its fourth surge of COVID-19 right now, and our nationwide case counts have increased by 64.4 percent over the last 21 days. (For more on our methodology, see our note at the bottom of this column.)

But while Southern states have been the main drivers of this surge thus far, the recent spike in cases in South Dakota warrants special concern.

The state more broadly has witnessed a 686.8 percent increase in daily case counts over the past three weeks, currently more than 10 times the nationwide rate. Meade County's post-Sturgis uptick is certainly a contributor to this state-level increase, but neighboring counties have experienced a sharp incline in cases, too—ranging from a 1,900 percent increase in the past three weeks in Butte to a 1,050 percent increase in Lawrence.

Those two counties are also key focal points for the rally, which is not, in reality, confined to Sturgis. And because the rally is widely attended by residents all across South Dakota, it's not surprising that counties further away—like Charles Mix County, which saw a 1,500 percent increase—are experiencing an incline in cases, too.

The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally represents the perfect storm for a superspreader event across this region: a large gathering with no testing, no masks, and no vaccination requirements. Though many (but not all) of the goings-on occurred outdoors and thus offered more protection against SARS-CoV-2 transmission than if they hadn't been, the South Dakota Department of Transportation reported that 525,768 vehicles entered Sturgis over the 10 days of the rally. The sheer number of people in attendance paired with a lack of additional precautions presented prime conditions for viral transmission.

Dr. Shankar Kurra, vice president of medical affairs at Monument Health in Rapid City, told The Daily Beast he was living through a nightmare on repeat.

"We knew this was going to happen," Dr. Kurra said. "It happened last year. It was just playing a reboot of last year pretty much."

Kurra added that hospitals in the area had 58 patients battling COVID-19 as of early this week. Before the rally, they had "a handful, five to 10," he said.

The vast majority of new infections in the United States are now occurring in individuals who are not fully vaccinated, including those that have been reported post-Sturgis; however, the uptake of vaccines varies widely across the country. In South Dakota, low trust in the government has been linked to vaccine hesitancy. As elsewhere in the U.S., vaccine hesitancy is higher among Republicans than Democrats in South Dakota, where nearly two-thirds of voters went for Trump in 2020.

Sub-optimal vaccination rates across South Dakota are a fundamental factor in understanding the recent spike in cases. In the United States, 51.6 percent of the total population is fully vaccinated, according to the CDC. But in Meade, only 38.3 percent of the total population is vaccinated. In nearby Lawrence County, the proportion of fully vaccinated residents is 37.4 percent and. at 26 percent, rates are lower yet in Butte.

Dr. Kevin Weiland, who works at the Rapid City Medical Center, which is not affiliated with Monument Health, said the Sturgis surge was not a surprise. But he bemoaned the extent to which unvaccinated people could put even those who had shots in greater danger, citing one senior care facility in the region he said had 17 residents who were infected with COVID, 15 of them vaccinated.

"These guys were vaccinated early on in the pandemic," he said, alluding to the emerging guidance from the CDC that vaccine protection may wane over time, particularly in vulnerable groups. "They were of the greatest risk. It's just so sad."

Weiland went on to explain that he was extremely frustrated to see this occurring at a time when vaccines are available, but millions of people were refusing to take them. During the Sturgis rally, several attendees told The Daily Beast they were unvaccinated and would not take a shot.

"People don't have to be told what to do. They need to know what to do," Weiland said. "This is crazy. We should be vaccinated and wearing a mask. This is just crazy, crazy, crazy."

New infections are strongly associated with vaccination rates across the country, and are an important factor when considering why some large events have been posited as superspreaders, while others have not been.

Take Lollapalooza, for instance. The largely (but not entirely) outdoor four-day music festival in Chicago was held July 29 through Aug. 1, but catered to a very different demographic than the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally.

Despite hosting over 100,000 individuals on each day of the festival, all signs suggest that Lollapalooza didn't result in a superspreader event. This may be thanks to the fact that Lollapalooza organizers—working in active partnership the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH)—required either proof of vaccination or a negative COVID-19 test within 72 hours prior to attendance, and 90 percent of attendees were fully vaccinated. Moreover, masks were required in indoor spaces for the last two days of the event (once more, under the advisement of the CDPH).

Sometimes referred to as "the Swiss cheese model of pandemic defense", preventive measures like testing, masks, and vaccination act together to protect against infection and perform best in combination than any one of them does alone. It's a reality that may have spared Lollapalooza from becoming a superspreader event—and could have done the same for the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, had political will allowed for it.

Unlike Lollapalooza, which was guided by health officials in enacting and enforcing a multi-layered COVID-19 safety protocol, the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally took place in a state where government has been largely apathetic in its pandemic response. In late July, mere weeks prior to the rally she attended herself, Gov. Kristi Noem went so far as to say that she had "no plans" to encourage vaccination among her constituents.

South Dakota Department of Health spokesman Daniel Bucheli told The Daily Beast the remarkable rise in cases was not unique to South Dakota.

"COVID-19 case spikes are following a national trend being experienced in every state, not just SD," Bucheli, who served as a deputy press secretary to President Donald Trump's 2020 campaign from 2019-20, said in an email on Tuesday. "Additionally, as of last night, per the CDC (over the last 7 days), SD is 31st in new cases and 38th in new deaths. Regarding new hospitalizations, we are tied for 35th." It's true that COVID-19 deaths in the state remain relatively low; in fact, the CDC's latest numbers showed the seven-day average of deaths per 100,000 people in the state was one of the lowest in the country. But there have always been lags between surges in cases and deaths from this virus.

And the degree of political indifference is particularly jarring, not only in the context of the Delta variant, but given the aftermath of last year's 80th Sturgis Motorcycle Rally as well. Though the exact number of cases attributable to the 2020 rally remains up for debate, it was widely considered to be a superspreader event (despite poorly defended claims to the contrary by South Dakota health officials).

While cases are rising not just in Meade County but also across the state—and the country—there is growing evidence that this year's rally could soon be considered the same. After all, the Delta variant that is now dominant in the United States is considerably more contagious than its predecessors.

"These viruses mutate," Weiland, who fled the state for pandemic-ravaged Florida during the rally, told The Daily Beast, before comparing the rise of variants to cannibalistic killer Jeffrey Dahmer.

"Jeff Dahmer was a mutation. It's going to be worse."

—with reporting by Tom Lawrence in South Dakota

Methodology: To calculate the 21-day percent change in reported cases, we used seven-day average cases from The New York Times and the following formula: 21-day percent change in cases = [(case count on August 24, 2021 in a given population) – (case count August 3, 2021, in a given population)] ÷ (case count on August 3, 2021, in a given population) × 100. For Butte and Charles Mix counties, we used 0.5 cases reported on August 3, 2021 to calculate the 3-week change in cases, as both reported 0 seven-day average cases on August 3, 2021.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on August 26, 2021, 10:00:07 AM
Yeah, right! Lollapalooza good because Democrat-run, Sturgis bad because Republican-run (never mind the "likely" and "potentially" and "widely considered" --- by whom?).

It all becomes so predictable...

(For the record, I was pro-vaccine until recently, but the latest reports and trends, including official statements and recommendations from the CDC and dr. Fauci himself, made me seriously reconsider my position.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 26, 2021, 12:29:29 PM
Going to Zoom with my church choir this evening, to see what we wish to do. Normally, we would resume rehearsing Thu 16 Sep.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 26, 2021, 02:08:09 PM
Quote from: Florestan on August 26, 2021, 10:00:07 AM
(For the record, I was pro-vaccine until recently, but the latest reports and trends, including official statements and recommendations from the CDC and dr. Fauci himself, made me seriously reconsider my position.)

I don't thrust Fauci and I don't care what he says. I trust Finnish authorities. Maybe you should listen to Romanian authorities rather than US authorities? Covid is totally politicized in the US. It is lunacy. Some anti-vaxxers over there are taking horse/cow de-wormers!  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on August 27, 2021, 12:16:11 AM
Fauci is touted as the expert in the US  ??? Knowledgeable yes, expert no. He's no longer researching and is simply an administrator which makes it amazing how so many have put him and his opinions up on a pedestal. This makes 71dbs statement about listening to his own countries medical authorities very credible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 27, 2021, 01:16:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on August 26, 2021, 10:00:07 AM

(For the record, I was pro-vaccine until recently, but the latest reports and trends, including official statements and recommendations from the CDC and dr. Fauci himself, made me seriously reconsider my position.)

So, what did Fauci say that made you change your mind?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on August 27, 2021, 03:43:11 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on August 26, 2021, 02:08:09 PM
Some anti-vaxxers over there are taking horse/cow de-wormers!  ???

A lot of pharma drugs were developed for one purpose then accidentally discovered to effect some other condition for which they then became approved. In the case of Ivermectin dewormer my wife thinks it could work by changing the acidity level of the blood.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on August 27, 2021, 04:20:32 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on August 27, 2021, 03:43:11 AM
A lot of pharma drugs were developed for one purpose then accidentally discovered to effect some other condition for which they then became approved. In the case of Ivermectin dewormer my wife thinks it could work by changing the acidity level of the blood.
Interesting!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 27, 2021, 05:51:34 AM
Indoor mask mandate starts in Boston, a day after Janey says COVID-19 cases have stabilized
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on August 27, 2021, 07:32:14 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on August 27, 2021, 03:43:11 AM
A lot of pharma drugs were developed for one purpose then accidentally discovered to effect some other condition for which they then became approved. In the case of Ivermectin dewormer my wife thinks it could work by changing the acidity level of the blood.

So why did they bother to develop the vaccines, if Covid-19 is dealt with simply changing the acidity level of the blood? How much does your wife know about the issue and why does she think this? What are her sources of (dis)information?

If dewormers become approved in Europe/Finland to deal with Covid-19 I will become more openminded, but as it is (no approval of any kind anywhere) I am totally sceptical, an anti-dewormer.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 27, 2021, 08:21:50 AM
New Israeli study:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-27/previous-covid-prevents-delta-infection-better-than-pfizer-shot

Interesting, but disclaimer: The data was posted as a preprint article on medRxiv, and hasn't yet been reviewed by other researchers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 27, 2021, 08:43:45 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on August 27, 2021, 03:43:11 AM
A lot of pharma drugs were developed for one purpose then accidentally discovered to effect some other condition for which they then became approved. In the case of Ivermectin dewormer my wife thinks it could work by changing the acidity level of the blood.

This drug works by interfering with muscle function in worms and insects. Blood pH is tightly regulated and variation in blood pH outside of a narrow range is a serious medical condition which can be caused by kidney failure, respiratory failure, diabetes, or other serious disorders.

These viral drug crazes are usually caused by several factors. Some doctor gives the drug off-label and the patient gets better. Well, it can be a coincidence, sometimes patients get better. This is why controlled studies are necessary. The other factor is that people seek to profit by selling a drug without any scientific basis by promoting it to conspiracy minded people.

In this case this drug is relatively safe when proscribed correctly. People who are self-medicating with it can overdose and harm or kill themselves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on August 27, 2021, 10:18:05 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on August 27, 2021, 08:43:45 AM
This drug works by interfering with muscle function in worms and insects. Blood pH is tightly regulated and variation in blood pH outside of a narrow range is a serious medical condition which can be caused by kidney failure, respiratory failure, diabetes, or other serious disorders.

These viral drug crazes are usually caused by several factors. Some doctor gives the drug off-label and the patient gets better. Well, it can be a coincidence, sometimes patients get better. This is why controlled studies are necessary. The other factor is that people seek to profit by selling a drug without any scientific basis by promoting it to conspiracy minded people.

In this case this drug is relatively safe when proscribed correctly. People who are self-medicating with it can overdose and harm or kill themselves.

Fair enough, she is just very curious and likes to research how things work. Particularly cheap things that the pharma industry can make no profit from.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on August 27, 2021, 03:01:33 PM
One person shows up at anti-lockdown protest in Auckland (https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/08/covid-19-one-person-shows-up-at-anti-lockdown-protest-in-auckland.html)


Reminds me of The Goodies episode where Bill Oddie is the sole football hooligan who is alone in the stadium.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 27, 2021, 03:05:19 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on August 27, 2021, 03:01:33 PM
One person shows up at anti-lockdown protest in Auckland (https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/08/covid-19-one-person-shows-up-at-anti-lockdown-protest-in-auckland.html)


Reminds me of The Goodies episode where Bill Oddie is the sole football hooligan who is alone in the stadium.

That's a hoot!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 28, 2021, 08:19:39 AM
A Calif. elementary school teacher took off her mask for a read-aloud. Within days, half her class was positive for delta.

Tangential q: So we know from testing that delta is the specific culprit, and not the earlier strain?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on August 28, 2021, 08:52:01 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 28, 2021, 08:19:39 AM
A Calif. elementary school teacher took off her mask for a read-aloud. Within days, half her class was positive for delta.

Tangential q: So we know from testing that delta is the specific culprit, and not the earlier strain?

I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Gurn Blanston on August 28, 2021, 09:01:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 28, 2021, 08:19:39 AM
A Calif. elementary school teacher took off her mask for a read-aloud. Within days, half her class was positive for delta.

Tangential q: So we know from testing that delta is the specific culprit, and not the earlier strain?

Voilá ici:
QuoteBut the various posts trying to cast doubt on the validity of the delta variant betray a lack of understanding of how variants are being identified and tracked. There is testing to identify delta and other variants, but it's more sophisticated than the routine clinical testing — often by polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, tests — used to simply determine whether someone has COVID-19.

Dr. Benjamin Pinsky, an associate professor of pathology and medicine at Stanford University, told us in a phone interview that it's worth first noting that "all the diagnostic tests are capable of detecting the delta variant — they just don't distinguish it from different lineages." In other words, the PCR tests do detect the delta variant as SARS-CoV-2. Identifying and tracking specific variants, however, requires additional analysis.

To do that, scientists use a process called genomic sequencing. As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention explains, sequencing is a way to decode the genes of a virus to better understand factors such as its spread and evolution.

John Everett, who helps conducts such research at Penn Medicine to understand the virus' presence in the Delaware Valley, explained it this way: "Research institutions, including Penn, study samples collected from the community by sequencing viral genomes in those samples. We identify mutations in the genomes, compared to the original Wuhan strain, where groupings of specific mutations are used to define viral variants or lineages."

"We track the relative rise and fall of different lineages which we can break apart by zip code to build a picture of how the different lineages are spreading in our area," Everett, the bioinformatics director for the University of Pennsylvania lab group behind the research, told us by email.

The group's data show how the delta variant has rapidly become the main lineage identified in most samples tested from the University of Pennsylvania Health System.

Some findings done through PCR tests can provide insights into the suspected lineage present. For example, the alpha variant — first identified in the United Kingdom in September 2020 — caused PCR failures involving the virus' S gene, which codes for the surface spike protein, because of the variant's mutations.

&c &c &c...

Things that are beyond us as laymen are everyday fodder for people who have dedicated their lives to working with stuff like that. :)

8)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 28, 2021, 10:46:40 AM
Quote from: Gurn Blanston on August 28, 2021, 09:01:39 AM
Voilá ici:
Things that are beyond us as laymen are everyday fodder for people who have dedicated their lives to working with stuff like that. :)

8)




Thanks, and I do count on that (and on them).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 30, 2021, 08:28:11 PM
Probably can avoid paywall by access via Google:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/moderna-jab-spurs-double-pfizer-covid-antibody-levels-in-study

Interesting, but it's a letter to the JAMA, not a full-fledged reviewed study.
Damn, wouldn't you know I had the 2 Pfizer shots... :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 30, 2021, 08:45:05 PM
Quote from: T. D. on August 30, 2021, 08:28:11 PM
Probably can avoid paywall by access via Google:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/moderna-jab-spurs-double-pfizer-covid-antibody-levels-in-study

Interesting, but it's a letter to the JAMA, not a full-fledged reviewed study.
Damn, wouldn't you know I had the 2 Pfizer shots... :(

I wouldn't feel bad for getting the Pfizer, T. D. It saved my sister's life. Remember she got COVID, had mild symptoms and then fully recovered. The important thing is you got the vaccine. I'll be getting the second dose of Pfizer this Friday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 31, 2021, 04:48:46 AM
Missourians packed into a city council meeting to fight a mask mandate. One of the attendees now has COVID — 8:26 a.m.
By The Washington Post

Two weeks ago, dozens of maskless Independence, Mo., residents gathered at an indoor city council meeting to debate a proposed mask mandate. The majority of council members in the Kansas City suburb rejected the mandate.

Now, the city's health department is warning all attendees they were "likely exposed" to the coronavirus. In a statement Monday, department officials said they have learned at least one person who attended the meeting has tested positive for the virus.

====================

Louisiana grapples with oxygen shortages in Ida's aftermath; New data confirm COVID-19 vaccines still provide strong protection
By Globe staffUpdated August 31, 2021
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 31, 2021, 05:21:02 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on August 30, 2021, 08:45:05 PM
I wouldn't feel bad for getting the Pfizer, T. D. It saved my sister's life. Remember she got COVID, had mild symptoms and then fully recovered. The important thing is you got the vaccine. I'll be getting the second dose of Pfizer this Friday.

Thanks, it was mostly a joke. Believe me, I got the shots as soon as I possibly could. Became eligible on a Tuesday (mid-March), first dose Sunday. Second opportunity @ County site; first one (Wednesday) "sold out" before I could respond.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on August 31, 2021, 07:34:59 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 31, 2021, 05:21:02 AM
Thanks, it was mostly a joke. Believe me, I got the shots as soon as I possibly could. Became eligible on a Tuesday (mid-March), first dose Sunday. Second opportunity @ County site; first one (Wednesday) "sold out" before I could respond.

Ah, I see. Well, looking back on it, I wish I had gotten my sooner rather than later. But I suppose getting them is the most important thing. There are still people out there that all government is evil and that they're looking to poison us all. ::) Trust me, if they wanted to kill us with something, they could, but I think these anti-vaxxers are being not only foolish, but are simply ignoring the fact that they're the reason why other people who aren't vaccinated are dying left and right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on August 31, 2021, 07:43:09 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 30, 2021, 08:28:11 PM
Probably can avoid paywall by access via Google:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/moderna-jab-spurs-double-pfizer-covid-antibody-levels-in-study

Interesting, but it's a letter to the JAMA, not a full-fledged reviewed study.
Damn, wouldn't you know I had the 2 Pfizer shots... :(

I haven't published in JAMA so I don't know by experience, but in other journals a "Letter" is reviewed by referees just like full length publications. The main criteria for a "Letter to Nature" or "Physical Review Letter" is that it is brief and of high interest. It is actually harder to get a "Letter" into most scientific journals because they are considered more high profile and prestigious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on August 31, 2021, 05:20:52 PM
Thanks, I didn't realize that.
BTW, the story was updated today. Main change seems to be addition of skeptical commentary.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 01, 2021, 01:30:46 AM
Quote from: T. D. on August 30, 2021, 08:28:11 PM
Damn, wouldn't you know I had the 2 Pfizer shots... :(

I had them too, but in Finland we waited for 3 months between jabs which they claim (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2021/05/covid-pfizer-vaccination-interval-antibody-response.aspx) produces more antibodies.  :)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 04:33:36 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on August 24, 2021, 03:43:17 AM(...)

In spite of somewhat increasing hospitalizations here in DK, the weekly published R number today is now down to 0.9 . I guess we'll see it during the coming week, if that's measurably correct.

After a bit more than a week, the R number continues to be 0.9 here in DK, and the daily number of registered infections has been going down slightly. The number of hospitalizations is unstable, currently maybe 10% increased compared to early last week, but still very manageable (went down a good deal today, to 134).
The virus is flourishing mainly among non-vaccinated, including children.

The EU now has 70% of the adult population vaccinated, which is well done, and in DK, it's 86%, 90% being the target for September. For the total population including children it's 71% here.

They're still expecting a virus increase in the autumn, and also a lot of ordinary influenza, recommending children and the elderly to get flu vaccines too.

At a recent festival in the UK, Boardmasters in Cornwall, with maybe 75,000 participants, almost 5000 were infected, due to Delta variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 01, 2021, 05:25:45 AM
I Want my MTV!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 01, 2021, 05:39:23 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 04:33:36 AM
After a bit more than a week, the R number continues to be 0.9 here in DK, and the daily number of registered infections has been going down slightly. The number of hospitalizations is unstable, currently maybe 10% increased compared to early last week, but still very manageable (went down a good deal today, to 134).
The virus is flourishing mainly among non-vaccinated, including children.

The EU now has 70% of the adult population vaccinated, which is well done, and in DK, it's 86%, 90% being the target for September. For the total population including children it's 71% here.

They're still expecting a virus increase in the autumn, and also a lot of ordinary influenza, recommending children and the elderly to get flu vaccines too.

At a recent festival in the UK, Boardmasters in Cornwall, with maybe 75,000 participants, almost 5000 were infected, due to Delta variants.
The elephant in the room is Israel. Vaccinated and transmission out of control.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 01, 2021, 09:27:42 AM
Oh, and about that "fetish?"

Massive randomized study is proof that surgical masks limit coronavirus spread, authors say
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 10:25:19 AM
Israel has currently vaccinated only 60.6 % of its total population,
whereas Denmark for example is at 72.5 %, and Iceland at 73.9 %.

Maybe there are some 'technical' details regarding Israel, for instance concerning the Palestinians etc..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 01, 2021, 11:01:15 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 10:25:19 AM

Maybe there are some 'technical' details regarding Israel, for instance concerning the Palestinians etc..

There's a thought.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 01, 2021, 11:02:32 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 10:25:19 AM
Israel has currently vaccinated only 60.6 % of its total population,
whereas Denmark for example is at 72.5 %, and Iceland at 73.9 %.

Maybe there are some 'technical' details regarding Israel, for instance concerning the Palestinians etc..

My experience in the USA [NY state] is that Orthodox/Hasidic Jews are vaccination-averse. Orthodox neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Orange County were hard-hit by COVID.
That could be an additional (besides Palestinian) factor in Israel, but it's just my speculation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 01, 2021, 11:04:12 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 01, 2021, 09:27:42 AM
Oh, and about that "fetish?"

Massive randomized study is proof that surgical masks limit coronavirus spread, authors say

Do you have a link to this?

Obviously surgical masks limit spread. The essential questions is how much the actual face coverings people use, and the way they actually use them, reduce the numbers of people who catch the disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 01, 2021, 11:19:20 AM
Often it's possible to find a source for a text excerpt by simply copying a big part of the text into the Google search function. In this case it's the WAPO.

Unrelated, but I once used that method to identify a hidden text source in an alleged 'letter to the editor' in a Danish newspaper: an entry looked suspicious, and by inserting that text in a Google translate into English, and searching for the resulting English text in Google, it turned out that the exact same, original source was an Asian newspaper in English, which the 'writer' had google-translated into Danish, because it was quick and easy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 01, 2021, 11:46:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 01, 2021, 11:04:12 AM
Do you have a link to this?

Obviously surgical masks limit spread. The essential questions is how much the actual face coverings people use, and the way they actually use them, reduce the numbers of people who catch the disease.


Link (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/01/masks-study-covid-bangladesh/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 02, 2021, 06:51:52 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(

Ouch!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 02, 2021, 09:41:34 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(

A story where one hopes for a good outcome, when hearing about it ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 02, 2021, 12:06:02 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 02, 2021, 09:41:34 AM
A story where one hopes for a good outcome, when hearing about it ...

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 02, 2021, 01:44:54 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(

Was he vaccinated?

I empathise with the breathlessness issue. I've been diagnosed with a mitral valve prolapse (apparently I've had this for some time) and with regurgitation back into the left atrium my heart is not working as efficiently as it should, leaving me with shortness of breath on any form of uphill journey. Wearing a mask makes it even harder so I now have an exemption. This is not good for a basically fit PE teacher but I don't think Covid will be a problem for me.

Let's hope your lab coordinator is vaccinated and that this has ameliorated the affects of Covid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 02, 2021, 03:07:12 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(
I'm so very sorry to hear of one of your co-workers battles with Covid.  All the best wishes for him and well wishes to you, your co-workers and his family and friends.  This must be very frightening and stressful for all that care about him...and also scary for you and your co-workers as to how close to home it now is.  Love to you all and am hoping the best for all of you.  Please keep in touch with us and let us know how things are going.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 02, 2021, 04:06:28 PM
Mu variant in Colombia
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:07:52 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 02, 2021, 06:05:15 AM
The pandemic has finally hit very close to home. Our lab coordinator went home sick Monday afternoon and has since tested positive for COVID. Although he says that he's feeling better (after sleeping for TWO DAYS), and expects to be back at work next week, he has at least a couple of strikes against him. First, age (over 65). But more importantly, a history of a very serious case of pneumonia two or three winters ago, a complication of Type A influenza, that landed him in hospital, in an ICU no less. He was later placed in a medically-induced coma and intubated, and was not expected to live. He survived, fortunately, but with severely scarred lungs. Even a year later, climbing a single flight of stairs at work left him breathless.

He doesn't need another respiratory infection, least of all one of the SARS variety. :(

Sorry to hear about this. Here's hoping he gets better.

I received my second dose of Pfizer today and, so far, the same symptoms as the first shot: a sore arm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 03, 2021, 07:09:56 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:07:52 PM
Sorry to hear about this. Here's hoping he gets better.

I received my second dose of Pfizer today and, so far, the same symptoms as the first shot: a sore arm.

Well done!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 03, 2021, 07:09:56 PM
Well done!

Thanks, Karl. My dad will be getting his second dose tomorrow, so hoping his goes as well as the first.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 03, 2021, 07:56:32 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:29:08 PM
Thanks, Karl. My dad will be getting his second dose tomorrow, so hoping his goes as well as the first.

Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 04, 2021, 04:19:14 AM
Thanks everyone. I've yet to hear any updates from or about Bob, but am keeping my fingers crossed for a good outcome.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 04, 2021, 04:31:39 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:07:52 PM
I received my second dose of Pfizer today and, so far, the same symptoms as the first shot: a sore arm.

Great! A sore arm is a very small price to pay for the protection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 04, 2021, 06:32:10 AM
Very interesting development in the UK - the JCVI, which is responsible for advising the government about the health implications of vaccines, have refused to endorse a general vaccination programme for 12 to 15 year olds.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-statement-september-2021-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years/jcvi-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years-3-september-2021
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 04, 2021, 06:52:44 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 04, 2021, 04:31:39 AM
Great! A sore arm is a very small price to pay for the protection.

Indeed. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 04, 2021, 06:59:16 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 04, 2021, 06:32:10 AM
Very interesting development in the UK - the JCVI, which is responsible for advising the government about the health implications of vaccines, have refused to endorse a general vaccination programme for 12 to 15 year olds.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-statement-september-2021-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years/jcvi-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15-years-3-september-2021

In Finland 61.2 % of children aged 12-15 have got their first Pfizer vaccine dose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 04, 2021, 08:11:29 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on September 03, 2021, 07:07:52 PM
Sorry to hear about this. Here's hoping he gets better.

I received my second dose of Pfizer today and, so far, the same symptoms as the first shot: a sore arm.
Good jab...pardon "job"!

Suggestion for you all,

To avoid stress, panic, wasting time, and avoiding feeling like an idiot....my suggestions--and I'm speaking from personal experience here:

1)  Make a copy of your Covid vaccination card (front and back)
2)  Scan your card (front and back) and save onto your computer and into the cloud
3)  Cut out front and back of card copy, tape together and then either have that laminated or (as a friend of mine did) use clear shipping tape to protect card copy
4)  Carry the copy with you
5)  Store the original someplace safe--and where you will remember putting it (like with your health records or jewelry box, etc.).

I had intended to do all of the above, but didn't get around to it.  I had kept the original in my purse (occasionally taking it out).  Tried to find it about a week ago.  Couldn't find it.  Thought that I had probably mixed it in with some paperwork on top of the dining room table....cue frantic hunt, etc.  And was starting to resign myself to the fact that it must have fallen out of my purse.  Trying hard not to panic, called the big pharmacy where I had had my shots and no, I couldn't get a replacement card.  Heart sank...but they did say that I could access my online record with them which I did and printed out a copy of my record with a QR code--which supposedly is better to have (better proof as it were) vs. the card.  That helped, but I didn't know if that would be good enough for all places or if I would have to sign into my account and bring it up on my phone [which also means remember the password to that company's account...yet another password!].

So, in any event, I found my card!  But I thought that I would share with you my story...and suggestions.

And, No. 6)  If you have a smart phone, you can probably download the store's app and access your records there.  I just signed in on their website on my computer and printed out the record there.

I'm sure that there are other ways and places that you can also access your records too...check with your local health authorities/state/primary care physician, etc.

And remember to bring your original card with you when you go to get your second shot and boosters!  And then make a new copy, etc.

Now that lunch is finished, I'm off to take my own advice!   ::)

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 04, 2021, 08:43:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 04, 2021, 08:11:29 AM
Good jab...pardon "job"!

Suggestion for you all,

To avoid stress, panic, wasting time, and avoiding feeling like an idiot....my suggestions--and I'm speaking from personal experience here:

1)  Make a copy of your Covid vaccination card (front and back)
2)  Scan your card (front and back) and save onto your computer and into the cloud
3)  Cut out front and back of card copy, tape together and then either have that laminated or (as a friend of mine did) use clear shipping tape to protect card copy
4)  Carry the copy with you
5)  Store the original someplace safe--and where you will remember putting it (like with your health records or jewelry box, etc.).

I had intended to do all of the above, but didn't get around to it.  I had kept the original in my purse (occasionally taking it out).  Tried to find it about a week ago.  Couldn't find it.  Thought that I had probably mixed it in with some paperwork on top of the dining room table....cue frantic hunt, etc.  And was starting to resign myself to the fact that it must have fallen out of my purse.  Trying hard not to panic, called the big pharmacy where I had had my shots and no, I couldn't get a replacement card.  Heart sank...but they did say that I could access my online record with them which I did and printed out a copy of my record with a QR code--which supposedly is better to have (better proof as it were) vs. the card.  That helped, but I didn't know if that would be good enough for all places or if I would have to sign into my account and bring it up on my phone [which also means remember the password to that company's account...yet another password!].

So, in any event, I found my card!  But I thought that I would share with you my story...and suggestions.

And, No. 6)  If you have a smart phone, you can probably download the store's app and access your records there.  I just signed in on their website on my computer and printed out the record there.

I'm sure that there are other ways and places that you can also access your records too...check with your local health authorities/state/primary care physician, etc.

And remember to bring your original card with you when you go to get your second shot and boosters!  And then make a new copy, etc.

Now that lunch is finished, I'm off to take my own advice!   ::)

Best wishes,

PD

Well said, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 04, 2021, 09:04:18 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 04, 2021, 08:43:53 AM
Well said, PD!
Thank you Karl!  :)

I just followed my own advice and copy is now in the zippered section of my purse, original scanned and into the cloud and original stored safely away.  ;)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 04, 2021, 03:11:45 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 04, 2021, 08:11:29 AM
Good jab...pardon "job"!

Suggestion for you all,

To avoid stress, panic, wasting time, and avoiding feeling like an idiot....my suggestions--and I'm speaking from personal experience here:

1)  Make a copy of your Covid vaccination card (front and back)
2)  Scan your card (front and back) and save onto your computer and into the cloud
3)  Cut out front and back of card copy, tape together and then either have that laminated or (as a friend of mine did) use clear shipping tape to protect card copy
4)  Carry the copy with you
5)  Store the original someplace safe--and where you will remember putting it (like with your health records or jewelry box, etc.).

I had intended to do all of the above, but didn't get around to it.  I had kept the original in my purse (occasionally taking it out).  Tried to find it about a week ago.  Couldn't find it.  Thought that I had probably mixed it in with some paperwork on top of the dining room table....cue frantic hunt, etc.  And was starting to resign myself to the fact that it must have fallen out of my purse.  Trying hard not to panic, called the big pharmacy where I had had my shots and no, I couldn't get a replacement card.  Heart sank...but they did say that I could access my online record with them which I did and printed out a copy of my record with a QR code--which supposedly is better to have (better proof as it were) vs. the card.  That helped, but I didn't know if that would be good enough for all places or if I would have to sign into my account and bring it up on my phone [which also means remember the password to that company's account...yet another password!].

So, in any event, I found my card!  But I thought that I would share with you my story...and suggestions.

And, No. 6)  If you have a smart phone, you can probably download the store's app and access your records there.  I just signed in on their website on my computer and printed out the record there.

I'm sure that there are other ways and places that you can also access your records too...check with your local health authorities/state/primary care physician, etc.

And remember to bring your original card with you when you go to get your second shot and boosters!  And then make a new copy, etc.

Now that lunch is finished, I'm off to take my own advice!   ::)

Best wishes,

PD

Mine's available to view via Apple Wallet. So is my mask exemption
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 05, 2021, 02:51:11 AM
Quote from: Holden on September 04, 2021, 03:11:45 PM
Mine's available to view via Apple Wallet. So is my mask exemption
Thanks for the tip Holden!  I'll have to look into that and see how it works.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 05:57:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 04, 2021, 08:11:29 AM
Good jab...pardon "job"!

Suggestion for you all,

To avoid stress, panic, wasting time, and avoiding feeling like an idiot....my suggestions--and I'm speaking from personal experience here:

1)  Make a copy of your Covid vaccination card (front and back)
2)  Scan your card (front and back) and save onto your computer and into the cloud
3)  Cut out front and back of card copy, tape together and then either have that laminated or (as a friend of mine did) use clear shipping tape to protect card copy
4)  Carry the copy with you
5)  Store the original someplace safe--and where you will remember putting it (like with your health records or jewelry box, etc.).

I had intended to do all of the above, but didn't get around to it.  I had kept the original in my purse (occasionally taking it out).  Tried to find it about a week ago.  Couldn't find it.  Thought that I had probably mixed it in with some paperwork on top of the dining room table....cue frantic hunt, etc.  And was starting to resign myself to the fact that it must have fallen out of my purse.  Trying hard not to panic, called the big pharmacy where I had had my shots and no, I couldn't get a replacement card.  Heart sank...but they did say that I could access my online record with them which I did and printed out a copy of my record with a QR code--which supposedly is better to have (better proof as it were) vs. the card.  That helped, but I didn't know if that would be good enough for all places or if I would have to sign into my account and bring it up on my phone [which also means remember the password to that company's account...yet another password!].

So, in any event, I found my card!  But I thought that I would share with you my story...and suggestions.

And, No. 6)  If you have a smart phone, you can probably download the store's app and access your records there.  I just signed in on their website on my computer and printed out the record there.

I'm sure that there are other ways and places that you can also access your records too...check with your local health authorities/state/primary care physician, etc.

And remember to bring your original card with you when you go to get your second shot and boosters!  And then make a new copy, etc.

Now that lunch is finished, I'm off to take my own advice!   ::)

Best wishes,

PD

Excellent advice PD! Mine is "safely" stashed away in a dresser drawer - my purse is actually inside my knapsack, but that doesn't make it any safer as the knapsack could always be stolen, or left behind somewhere by mistake. But a backup copy is always safer, and an electronic copy in the cloud safest of all. After all, the apartment and dresser could burn down (heaven forbid)!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 05, 2021, 06:15:14 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 05:57:01 AM
Excellent advice PD! Mine is "safely" stashed away in a dresser drawer - my purse is actually inside my knapsack, but that doesn't make it any safer as the knapsack could always be stolen, or left behind somewhere by mistake. But a backup copy is always safer, and an electronic copy in the cloud safest of all. After all, the apartment and dresser could burn down (heaven forbid)!
Yes, that would be an even bigger problem for you!  ???

Holden had mentioned about the Apple Wallet.  I have (so far) avoided using it being rather wary about keeping any credit cards, etc. on my older iPhone.  But putting my vaccine certificate on there would, I think, be o.k.?  Do you bother to keep a copy of your vaccination record in your purse?  It took a little while to make it and cover it with clear tape (I'm sure that getting it laminated would have been easier.), but it's done and won't need to think about this process again 'til I get a booster.  And, a good excuse to take some time to watch the US Open whilst I was at it.  ;D

So far, I haven't been anywhere where I would need to show it in order to enter an event/restaurant, etc.  Have you?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 09:45:24 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 05, 2021, 06:15:14 AM
Yes, that would be an even bigger problem for you!  ???

Holden had mentioned about the Apple Wallet.  I have (so far) avoided using it being rather wary about keeping any credit cards, etc. on my older iPhone.  But putting my vaccine certificate on there would, I think, be o.k.?  Do you bother to keep a copy of your vaccination record in your purse?  It took a little while to make it and cover it with clear tape (I'm sure that getting it laminated would have been easier.), but it's done and won't need to think about this process again 'til I get a booster.  And, a good excuse to take some time to watch the US Open whilst I was at it.  ;D

So far, I haven't been anywhere where I would need to show it in order to enter an event/restaurant, etc.  Have you?

PD

The one piece of personal information on my vaccination card is my birth date - that's the only (slight) concern I would have about putting it on a commercial "cloud" server (and I'm not sure a commercial server is any more vulnerable to being hacked than a government one, anyway).

No, I haven't needed to show it anywhere either, but I haven't traveled much since the pandemic began and as far as I know, no establishment in New England (almost certainly not in Vermont) requires proof of vaccination as a condition of entry. At the university where I teach, we were only required to "attest" that we were fully vaccinated - we never needed to prove it. If I really needed to show  that proof to get into stores and other places I frequent, I'd be more proactive about making a copy... but as of this morning, I only have the original, sitting in my bedroom dresser (as I said). :)

Yes, I know, I really should AT LEAST keep it somewhere safe from fire or weather - so I just transferred it to my small safe where I keep all my important papers. And I should certainly make a copy and keep it somewhere else... I will probably do that in the near future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 05, 2021, 09:54:09 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 09:45:24 AM
The one piece of personal information on my vaccination card is my birth date - that's the only (slight) concern I would have about putting it on a commercial "cloud" server (and I'm not sure a commercial server is any more vulnerable to being hacked than a government one, anyway).

No, I haven't needed to show it anywhere either, but I haven't traveled much since the pandemic began and as far as I know, no establishment in New England (almost certainly not in Vermont) requires proof of vaccination as a condition of entry. At the university where I teach, we were only required to "attest" that we were fully vaccinated - we never needed to prove it. If I really needed to show  that proof to get into stores and other places I frequent, I'd be more proactive about making a copy... but as of this morning, I only have the original, sitting in my bedroom dresser (as I said). :)

Yes, I know, I really should AT LEAST keep it somewhere safe from fire or weather - so I just transferred it to my small safe where I keep all my important papers. And I should certainly make a copy and keep it somewhere else... I will probably do that in the near future.
I understand your concerns re birthdate.  I have mixed feelings about that and maybe should think further there.  One thought:  perhaps in a safe deposit box at a bank (no guarantees re fire, etc. there too).  By the way (not trying to panic you here) but do you do re your small safe, what does the company guarantee it to being able to protect you re what exactly?

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 05, 2021, 09:59:11 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 09:45:24 AM
The one piece of personal information on my vaccination card is my birth date - that's the only (slight) concern I would have about putting it on a commercial "cloud" server (and I'm not sure a commercial server is any more vulnerable to being hacked than a government one, anyway).

No, I haven't needed to show it anywhere either, but I haven't traveled much since the pandemic began and as far as I know, no establishment in New England (almost certainly not in Vermont) requires proof of vaccination as a condition of entry. At the university where I teach, we were only required to "attest" that we were fully vaccinated - we never needed to prove it. If I really needed to show  that proof to get into stores and other places I frequent, I'd be more proactive about making a copy... but as of this morning, I only have the original, sitting in my bedroom dresser (as I said). :)

Yes, I know, I really should AT LEAST keep it somewhere safe from fire or weather - so I just transferred it to my small safe where I keep all my important papers. And I should certainly make a copy and keep it somewhere else... I will probably do that in the near future.

A couple of weeks ago, friends and I dined in at a nearby restaurant, proof was not required.

On Wednesday, I have an appt at the Registry of Motor Vehicles, shan't need proof there, either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 11:54:22 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 05, 2021, 09:54:09 AM
I understand your concerns re birthdate.  I have mixed feelings about that and maybe should think further there.  One thought:  perhaps in a safe deposit box at a bank (no guarantees re fire, etc. there too).  By the way (not trying to panic you here) but do you do re your small safe, what does the company guarantee it to being able to protect you re what exactly?

All the best,

PD

The safe isn't "guaranteed" by a company that I know of and it's at least 30 years old (passed down from my late parents).... but it was advertised as fireproof when they bought it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 05, 2021, 11:55:07 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 05, 2021, 09:59:11 AM
A couple of weeks ago, friends and I dined in at a nearby restaurant, proof was not required.

On Wednesday, I have an appt at the Registry of Motor Vehicles, shan't need proof there, either.

Thanks, Karl, for the data points...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 05, 2021, 01:54:09 PM
This might be getting out of hand.  If you had your vaccine at a major pharmacy or hospital they have records of it and can write you a new one if you lost it.  I don't think one needs safe deposit boxes on top of digital scans and laminated copies.  Have a digital copy and two physical copies in different locations (like home and work) and I'm sure you'll be more than fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 03:03:35 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 05, 2021, 01:54:09 PM
This might be getting out of hand.  If you had your vaccine at a major pharmacy or hospital they have records of it and can write you a new one if you lost it.  I don't think one needs safe deposit boxes on top of digital scans and laminated copies.  Have a digital copy and two physical copies in different locations (like home and work) and I'm sure you'll be more than fine.
Actually, David, when I called up the major box store chain which also has a pharmacy from which I received my two shots, I was told that they could not replace my card.  I was told that they had gotten much stricter rule-wise regarding that [You must have missed my earlier posting which is what brought up this whole line of discussion?].  I don't know if that would also apply to if I were going back for my second round, but I suspect so.  In any event, they did tell me about a digital app that I could download and access it that way.  I was able to sign in to my store account on my desktop (which I had created per their instructions) just for the card and make a printout with the information and a QR code.

That's a good idea though about keeping a copy of it at work.

Out of curiosity, I had looked at the US Open's website (as I've been watching the tennis) just to see what they would take as proof.  You can see it here:  https://www.usopen.org/en_US/tickets/tickets_faq.html?promo=subnav

PD

p.s.  I've only eaten out once lately (locally) and proof wasn't required.  They have reinstated mandatory mask-wearing when indoors at a business in my town by the way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 03:50:42 AM
At CVS where I got my shots I was explicitly told that if I lost it they would fill out another one for me.

I've never had to present a vaccine card anywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 05:07:36 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 03:50:42 AM
At CVS where I got my shots I was explicitly told that if I lost it they would fill out another one for me.

I've never had to present a vaccine card anywhere.
Interesting re CVS.  Do you recall when you were told this?  I had called my store on 8/31/21 (I did my printout from that store later that same day as I had called them), so things might have changed since when you were told?

In any event, I'm glad that so far anyway, it's been a non-issue for you.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 05:33:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 03:03:35 AM
Out of curiosity, I had looked at the US Open's website (as I've been watching the tennis) just to see what they would take as proof.  You can see it here:  https://www.usopen.org/en_US/tickets/tickets_faq.html?promo=subnav

I noticed this also:

"Will the US Open require fans to show evidence of COVID-19 vaccination?

To facilitate compliance with the recent updates to the NYC Executive Orders, proof of at least 1 dose of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine IS required for all fans aged 12 and over."

With the delta variant surging nearly everywhere, a single dose of an mRNA vaccine offers scant protection. It would be more encouraging if they required full vaccination.

QuoteThey have reinstated mandatory mask-wearing when indoors at a business in my town by the way.

I wish they would do that in my county. It has now BY FAR the highest per capita case rate in the state (375 per 100k population). At my university, we're all waiting for the second shoe to drop - the president announcing that our mask mandate has been lifted, as he promised to do "soon" (that was 4 weeks ago). If he does that, there will be immense pushback from us faculty.  >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 06, 2021, 05:37:31 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-06/overwhelmed-morgues-belie-u-s-illusion-of-a-defanged-pandemic

...
For weeks into early August, the delta surge in the U.K. lulled some Americans into a sense of complacency. Across the Atlantic, cases soared but killed relatively few people, and in theory, the mutated virus would act similarly in the U.S. But delta exposed a key difference: The U.S. has fallen far short of the U.K. in vaccinating the oldest members of the community, who remain most at risk of hospitalization and death.

That largely explains the U.S.'s failure: About 18% of Americans 65-and-over still aren't fully vaccinated, versus about 5% in the U.K. "That's a huge difference," said Jeffrey Morris, a professor of biostatistics at the University of Pennsylvania. "When you have four times as high a proportion that are unvaccinated, that's going to cause a lot more death right there."

The U.S. has already posted twice as many deaths per capita since early June as the U.K., even though its surge started later. In Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana, the tolls are 4-6 times as high -- exacerbated by populations that tend to be older or have more pre-existing conditions.
...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 05:55:44 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 06, 2021, 05:37:31 AM
About 18% of Americans 65-and-over still aren't fully vaccinated, versus about 5% in the U.K. "That's a huge difference," said Jeffrey Morris, a professor of biostatistics at the University of Pennsylvania. "When you have four times as high a proportion that are unvaccinated, that's going to cause a lot more death right there."

I'm sure that partially explains what is happening in my county - a whopping 46% of residents 65-and-over still aren't fully vaccinated. 41% haven't even received a first dose. The issue isn't so much a lot of deaths - the population is too small to have valid statistics on the death rate - but simply the level of community transmission, as reflected in the rate of symptomatic cases (as those are the only ones tracked by the CDC).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 06:15:38 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 05:33:30 AM
I noticed this also:

"Will the US Open require fans to show evidence of COVID-19 vaccination?

To facilitate compliance with the recent updates to the NYC Executive Orders, proof of at least 1 dose of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine IS required for all fans aged 12 and over."

With the delta variant surging nearly everywhere, a single dose of an mRNA vaccine offers scant protection. It would be more encouraging if they required full vaccination.

I wish they would do that in my county. It has now BY FAR the highest per capita case rate in the state (375 per 100k population). At my university, we're all waiting for the second shoe to drop - the president announcing that our mask mandate has been lifted, as he promised to do "soon" (that was 4 weeks ago). If he does that, there will be immense pushback from us faculty.  >:(
Yes, I think that they should have required a second vaccination too.

So sorry to hear about the intransigence of your president.  You would think that at a university in particular that the PTB would be smart enough to require them.  Are the students and faculty, etc. all required to be vaccinated?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 06:33:55 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 06:15:38 AM
Yes, I think that they should have required a second vaccination too.

So sorry to hear about the intransigence of your president.  You would think that at a university in particular that the PTB would be smart enough to require them.  Are the students and faculty, etc. all required to be vaccinated?

PD

Yes - subject to religious and medical exemptions (that must be documented). I think over 90% of the students are vaccinated (last I heard). I assume the percentage for faculty is at least that high. But with the delta surge, of course, multiple mitigation strategies are needed.

One positive bit of news that I heard at our first faculty meeting a week ago: faculty are authorized to impose mask mandates on our classrooms. Earlier we were told that the president's policy would apply campus-wide and that faculty couldn't impose stricter requirements. But if universal masking is dropped, a mask mandate in the classroom will just be a finger in a leaking dike. And I have 5 lab sections, all taught in person. As it is, it's a constant battle to get students to wear the mask properly (over the nose as well as the mouth).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 07:02:04 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 05:07:36 AM
Interesting re CVS.  Do you recall when you were told this?  I had called my store on 8/31/21 (I did my printout from that store later that same day as I had called them), so things might have changed since when you were told?

In any event, I'm glad that so far anyway, it's been a non-issue for you.  :)

PD

Wait that is where you went?  I was told when I got the shots.  Okay maybe I should be more concerned about my vaccine record.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 07:04:04 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 06:33:55 AM
faculty are authorized to impose mask mandates on our classrooms.

Must be nice.  A local teacher here did that for the safety of his students and their family, and he was put on disciplinary leave.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 06, 2021, 07:09:24 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 07:04:04 AM
Must be nice.  A local teacher here did that for the safety of his students and their family, and he was put on disciplinary leave.

That really sucks. Okay, this is what we were TOLD (by the college dean, not by the president himself). The president is new, and lines of communication are shaky since several of the key administrative positions have been vacant since the spring, so it's possible that things are not as "rosy" as I think. I'm sure the picture will be clarified as we go forward. Anyway, if this president has any respect for science and data, he will make the mask mandate permanent, or at least "until further notice". It's not as if the students were confined to campus - and as long as they can circulate in the community, travel home on weekends, etc., they are at risk of picking up and transmitting the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 06, 2021, 07:20:00 AM
An anti-vaccine paramilitary group in the United Kingdom has disbanded after a British newspaper exposed the organization's discussions of a violent crossbow attack on vaccine centers. The group consisted of more than 200 former military members and called itself "Veterans 4 Freedom." Members communicated via messaging app Telegram to plan the potential attack, with one member writing that "if it comes to an insurgency, the military will become enemy combatants and we'll take them out using dirty tricks." After The Mail on Sunday published its findings, the leader of Veterans 4 Freedom pulled the plug on the organization, though some members have already formed a new one called the "Global Veterans Alliance."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 06, 2021, 07:23:59 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 06, 2021, 07:20:00 AM
An anti-vaccine paramilitary group in the United Kingdom has disbanded after a British newspaper exposed the organization's discussions of a violent crossbow attack on vaccine centers. The group consisted of more than 200 former military members and called itself "Veterans 4 Freedom." Members communicated via messaging app Telegram to plan the potential attack, with one member writing that "if it comes to an insurgency, the military will become enemy combatants and we'll take them out using dirty tricks." After The Mail on Sunday published its findings, the leader of Veterans 4 Freedom pulled the plug on the organization, though some members have already formed a new one called the "Global Veterans Alliance."

This is living proof that people need more thorough mental evaluations before returning to society. Absolute crazies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 07:31:58 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 06, 2021, 07:20:00 AM
An anti-vaccine paramilitary group in the United Kingdom has disbanded after a British newspaper exposed the organization's discussions of a violent crossbow attack on vaccine centers. The group consisted of more than 200 former military members and called itself "Veterans 4 Freedom." Members communicated via messaging app Telegram to plan the potential attack, with one member writing that "if it comes to an insurgency, the military will become enemy combatants and we'll take them out using dirty tricks." After The Mail on Sunday published its findings, the leader of Veterans 4 Freedom pulled the plug on the organization, though some members have already formed a new one called the "Global Veterans Alliance."

I like how they are supposedly for "freedom" but not for people to have the freedom to choose to be vaccinated.  Apparently freedom to them means obey them or be hurt (the opposite of freedom).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 07:53:59 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 07:02:04 AM
Wait that is where you went?  I was told when I got the shots.  Okay maybe I should be more concerned about my vaccine record.
No, I went to a different chain.  Perhaps it's a state thing?  I don't know.  I was just told in so many words that "they" had been tightening up on the rules or something along those lines and that they were no longer able to give out a duplicate card.  I trust that the person that I spoke to at the pharmacy knew what they were talking about.  Sometime when you happen to go to that CVS, you could ask someone at the pharmacy?  In any event, I would suggest tucking your original away in a safe place.   :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 06, 2021, 08:01:42 AM

The Florida State Motto is being changed to "In order to create a more virulent variant."

In Florida, a summer of death and resistance as the coronavirus rampaged

By Saundra Amrhein, Fenit Nirappil, Jared Leone and Jacqueline Dupree

Yesterday at 5:42 p.m. EDT

THE VILLAGES, Fla. — They trickled into a theater resembling a barn and refashioned as a site administering antibodies to treat covid-19: retired couples holding gloved hands, an elderly man stumbling as a woman held his arm, paramedics donning oxygen masks.

Other retirees zipped past the theater on bicycles and in golf carts, whizzing through the busy shopping and entertainment plaza in the nation's largest retirement community.

Sara Branscome, 61, marveled at how life goes on amid crisis as she sat masked in her home's screened patio several miles away. After returning to the gym for just two weeks, she stopped going as case numbers soared during Florida's devastating summer coronavirus wave and as friends and acquaintances became infected, including a member of her synagogue who died. She has been on shutdown mode ever since.

"We did everything," Branscome lamented. "And why is it that we have to be the ones who do everything again?"

As Florida appears to be turning the corner from a coronavirus rampage that fueled record new infections, hospitalizations and deaths, its residents and leaders are surveying the damage left from more than 7,000 deaths reported since July Fourth and the scars inflicted by feuds over masks and vaccines. New infections were averaging more than 22,000 a day in the last days of August but have fallen to about 19,000. Yet recovery could prove fleeting: Holiday weekends such as Labor Day have acted as a tinderbox for earlier outbreaks, and late summer marks the return of students to college campuses.

In the wake of the summer surge, older Floridians cling to a sense of safety afforded by vaccines.

Health-care workers process the trauma of witnessing mass suffering and death that could have been averted if only more people had been immunized.

And hospital leaders exhale as covid-19 admissions appear to have subsided from a peak of more than 17,000 in late August, dipping to about 15,000. The decline follows weeks of frenzy as a slew of hospitals treated more patients than at any point in the pandemic, reassigning employees, postponing surgeries and treating patients in hallways and reconfigured rooms.

"Hospitals have pushed to the limits their ability to surge," said Mary Mayhew, president and chief executive of the Florida Hospital Association. "It's going to take us quite some time to really assess the short-term and long-term consequences."

Epidemiologists say Florida taught the nation important lessons as the highly transmissible delta variant of the virus accounts for nearly all new cases.

Even with vaccination rates slightly above the national average, Florida provided ideal conditions for the virus to flourish. Businesses have largely reopened. Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) has waged high-profile fights to stop mask mandates at schools and to shield businesses from fines for allowing unvaccinated and unmasked patrons.

Cindy A. Prins, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at the University of Florida, said her state's experience shows policymakers must act quickly to stave off an explosion of delta variant cases.

"Every time in Florida, we are a warning for everyone else," Prins said. "If you do remove those precautions, I would have a very low threshold before deciding to put them back in. If you wait two or three weeks, it's too late."

As the delta variant began to spread, it appeared Florida might be spared the worst, with vaccines seeming to prevent a wave of death in a state in which vulnerable older residents were immunized in disproportionately high numbers. In late June and early July, the state averaged fewer than 30 deaths a day.

But as of Thursday, Florida averaged 325 newly reported deaths daily in the preceding seven days, the highest since the pandemic started.

Experts attribute Florida's high death count to its substantial population of older residents, which means even an unvaccinated minority includes hundreds of thousands of susceptible victims.

But this wave spared no age group. By early June, 82 percent of all covid-19 deaths since the start of the pandemic had been among people 65 and older. In July and August, older Floridians accounted for less than two-thirds of covid deaths, according to state figures.

With so much virus in circulation, disease trackers fear the emergence of more fearsome threats.

"Unfortunately, there are leaders in very important places that seem to have a mind-set that it's best to let the virus spread out and let the chips fall where they may. But I think that's an incredibly dangerous and callous approach," said Aileen Marty, an infectious-diseases expert at Florida International University. "Remember that every time you allow it to continue to have high transmission, you are facilitating the creation of a worse variant."

Florida health officials did not respond to interview requests.

Christina Pushaw, a spokeswoman for DeSantis, defended the governor's leadership during the summer surge. She contended Florida was faring better than expected because it does not have one of the highest death rates in the country despite having one of the largest populations of senior citizens, the most likely age group to die of covid-19.

Florida's per capita covid death rate since the pandemic started ranks 18th among states, according to Washington Post tracking. But during the Southern surge over the past eight weeks, Florida's rate has been higher than all but those of Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

Pushaw also credited DeSantis for a string of appearances encouraging use of monoclonal antibodies, an effective, widely available covid treatment that experts say has been insufficiently promoted by the federal government.

All states "should be working to provide patients with free and easy access to monoclonal antibody treatment — and governors have an important platform to educate their constituents about this clinically proven, lifesaving early treatment," Pushaw wrote in an email.

While the antibodies help once people are sick, health authorities stress that vaccines remain the best way to prevent death. Hospitals have reported that unvaccinated people account for most deaths.

AdventHealth in Orange County, one of the first Florida health systems to sound alarms about rapidly increasing admissions, recently activated plans to use refrigerated trucks to store bodies because hospital morgues could not keep up with rising covid deaths.

"The floodwaters were rising so quickly you had to make decisions on the fly," said Vincent Hsu, AdventHealth's executive director of infection control. "We've had a plan for preparing ever since the pandemic started, but the number of the cases in this surge of the delta variant was just really unprecedented, and it was quite catastrophic."

In southwestern Florida, Lee Health in Fort Myers — which operates a safety-net hospital — has been recording as many as a dozen patient deaths a day from covid and expects that number to grow because fatalities tend to peak several weeks after the peak of hospitalizations.

"If people would only have the opportunity to walk around the ICU hallways and see what's going on and seeing the sickness and how young people are being struck down with this disease," said Larry Antonucci, the hospital's president and chief executive.

But the misery inside hospital walls often remains invisible from outside, frustrating some who have been caught in the summer wave.

In the Villages, David Rubin is recovering from a breakthrough case that left him hospitalized. He received convalescent plasma treatment for three days and oxygen at home for several weeks. Rubin, who is 78 and has a pacemaker and high blood pressure, credits vaccination for saving his life. He and his partner, who had a breakthrough infection with milder symptoms, are regularly wearing masks again and are disturbed to see that many of their neighbors do not share their sense of urgency.

"No masks, partying, carrying on like crazy, people doing all the stuff they did before, not even any consideration," Rubin said.

Other vaccinated people said their brushes with covid left them more confident about their ability to navigate daily life.

Lee Ann Rozanske, 64, a retired Illinois schoolteacher living in the Villages, experienced no serious symptoms after testing positive in mid-August. She said she wishes she had worn a mask during a two-day substitute-teaching stint at a charter school where face coverings were not mandated. A sneezing and coughing student approached her desk.

But she also feels "bullet proof" as she anticipates an upcoming cruise she and her husband plan to take — armed with their masks. She figures she has plenty of antibodies from her infection and from getting the shot. Her takeaway: People should get vaccinated and live life with simple measures such as masks to protect themselves.

"It reduced my anxiety," Rozanske said about her breakthrough case. "I got it. It was the thing that I feared, and it wasn't a big deal."

Florida's relative normalcy was on display at Clearwater Beach near Tampa last weekend. Couples held hands, parents pushed strollers, and mostly maskless groups of people strolled the palm-tree-lined sidewalks along the beach. A string of red and gray balloons heralded the entrance to a private grand-opening party for a bar owned by wrestler Hulk Hogan.

T.J. Haskins, a visitor from North Carolina, said he wasn't concerned about the spike in cases as he jostled for a photo with a wrestling manager he spotted in the bar.

"Florida is open," Haskins, 44, said.

At a mostly deserted grass lawn nearby, Millie Lincoln, 28, and her partner, Carmen Cristobol, watched Cristobol's young niece run around as they sought an escape from the surge in coronavirus cases consuming their lives as health-care workers in Orlando.

Lincoln, a patient care technician, was skeptical about vaccines until the surge of covid patients at work underscored the stakes of inaction. She and her partner, a nurse at a hospital where covid patients take up an entire floor, were the only customers wearing masks at a chocolate shop earlier that afternoon.

"I don't think this will stop if we don't do something," Lincoln said, a mask clinging to her face.

A boat horn wailed in the distance. Lincoln turned and pointed to a rooftop bar packed with people.

"You look up there, and there's a rooftop party going on in the middle of a pandemic," she said.

Meanwhile, Florida funeral homes are enduring the strain of hundreds of deaths a day. Rick Prindiville said the Orange County funeral home he manages fielded more than 40 calls last month — triple the usual — and is booked for the next two weeks.

"With all of these deaths, somebody has to take care of these people passing away and, unfortunately, that is our job," said Prindiville, board president of the Florida Cemetery Cremation and Funeral Association.

At a cemetery in St. Petersburg, heavy equipment buzzed in the background as a nearly 10-worker crew got their orders for the day.

After weeks of overseeing grave digging for covid victims, cemetery supervisor Ross Nelson plans to get vaccinated despite earlier concerns about long-term side effects.

"I'll probably end up getting it," Nelson said. "Hopefully, the best version of it."

Amrhein reported from the Villages. Leone reported from Clearwater. Nirappil and Dupree reported from Washington.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 08:27:25 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 07:53:59 AM
No, I went to a different chain.  Perhaps it's a state thing?  I don't know.  I was just told in so many words that "they" had been tightening up on the rules or something along those lines and that they were no longer able to give out a duplicate card.  I trust that the person that I spoke to at the pharmacy knew what they were talking about.  Sometime when you happen to go to that CVS, you could ask someone at the pharmacy?  In any event, I would suggest tucking your original away in a safe place.   :)

PD

I know a couple of people that just went back there to get their booster, I'll ask them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 06, 2021, 10:13:31 AM
Can 'breakthrough' COVID-19 lead to lingering symptoms?

Doctors are starting to see 'long COVID' cases among the few vaccinated people who get COVID-19, but it's not clear how common this will be.

By Felice J. Freyer Globe Staff, Updated September 5, 2021, 4:30 p.m.

Doctors who treat people with long-lasting symptoms from COVID-19 are starting to see some cases of "long COVID" in vaccinated people who suffered from breakthrough infections.

But it's too soon to tell whether long COVID will be less prevalent among people who took the vaccine but became infected anyway — those uncommon "breakthrough" cases. Some evidence suggests vaccination may lower the risk of developing this syndrome of persistent symptoms even in breakthrough cases.

"We haven't had enough time to see what happens," as more people have become vaccinated, said Dr. Jason Maley, a pulmonologist who leads the Critical Illness and COVID-19 Survivorship Program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Maley said he has seen a few cases of long COVID among vaccinated people, but doesn't yet know how common it will be.

Dr. Jennifer Possick, medical director of the Post-COVID Recovery Program at Yale New Haven Hospital, said she's not aware of any vaccinated people seeking treatment for long COVID at her clinic, but she expects to start seeing some soon.

"We're absolutely anticipating them for sure," Possick said, "because breakthrough cases are otherwise behaving much like the primary cases we saw."

In Philadelphia, Dr. Benjamin Abramoff, director of the Post-COVID Assessment and Recovery Clinics at Penn Medicine, said patients who had breakthrough infections have come to his clinic, but in smaller numbers than unvaccinated people.

When vaccinated people become infected with the coronavirus, their illness tends to be milder, and milder illness is less likely to lead to long COVID, he said.

"People who just have a runny nose and a sore throat are less likely to have long COVID than the ones who are bedbound for a month and have severe headaches," Abramoff said.

By preventing those more severe cases even when it doesn't prevent infection, the vaccine reduces the risk of long COVID, he said.

"Certainly [vaccination] protects you against long COVID," Abramoff said.

A recent study in the United Kingdom, looking at data from 1.2 million adults, backs up this notion. It found that vaccinated people were 50 percent less likely than unvaccinated to still have symptoms four weeks after becoming ill with COVID-19.

"This result suggests that the risk of long COVID is reduced in individuals who have received double vaccination [the two recommended doses], when additionally considering the already documented reduced risk of infection overall," the authors write in the Lancet Infectious Diseases, published Sept. 1.

Long COVID — sometimes called Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, or PASC — is a little understood condition, or group of conditions, in which people who suffered from COVID-19 remain ill weeks to months after the virus has cleared their systems. It affects an estimated 10 percent to 30 percent of COVID-19 survivors, most of whom were not sick enough to need hospitalization.

In some cases, patients failed to bounce back from their initial illness. Other times, people feel they've recovered and then two weeks or a month later get hit with a new array of symptoms.

Among the most common are fatigue, brain fog, insomnia, headaches, breathing difficulties, and heart palpitations. Some people experience numbness in limbs or dizziness. But the fatigue and cognitive difficulties can be the most troubling symptoms, often leaving people unable to work.

Lauren Bazensky used to run every day, easily traversing 8 miles. But after getting COVID-19 in April, the 41-year-old consultant gets out of breath walking short distances and each day has to parse out a finite store of energy.

"I don't have the energy to do the things that bring me joy," she said.

She also suffers from insomnia and muscle stiffness, and most worrisome of all, her thinking feels fuzzy, impaired. She has a hard time retrieving words.

"I don't have access to my brain like I did before," she said. "That's the scary part."

Bazensky, who lives in Chicago, said she got infected two weeks after receiving her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. She describes herself as someone who has "a very, very weak immune system" and catches whatever bug is circulating.

When she described her prolonged symptoms to her doctors, they didn't have much to offer. Only recently did Bazensky learn of a long COVID clinic near her home in Chicago, the Northwestern Medicine Comprehensive COVID-19 Center, which she plans to visit.

The Northwestern clinic is among dozens that have sprung up around the country in response to a growing number of long COVID cases.

Working with the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 35 of these clinics — including the one at Beth Israel — have formed a collaborative to develop treatment guidelines. The first guideline, on managing fatigue, was recently published.

But there remains no silver bullet, and treatment typically comes down to managing each symptom one by one, with such measures as breathing exercises, meditation, and physical therapy.

At Beth Israel, which currently treats about 400 long COVID patients, most patients gradually get better and some have improved so much that they no longer have to come back, Maley said.

There's one sure way to avoid long COVID, said Possick, the Yale doctor: Avoid getting COVID-19 in the first place. And the vaccine — along with masking and distancing, especially in high-transmission areas — remains the best way to do that, she said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 06, 2021, 10:29:48 AM
The lunacy never ends. The disbelief in science and the belief in "personal freedom" are the two deadliest attributes one can level at these anti-vaxxers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 06, 2021, 12:50:21 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 06, 2021, 08:27:25 AM
I know a couple of people that just went back there to get their booster, I'll ask them.
If you do ask them, you might also ask when they were told their answer (as in, it might have changed or they might be relying on old info).

A young woman decided to go to Hawaii for a vacation only she created a false Covid-19 vaccination card!

https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2021/09/02/vaccine-fake-card-hawaii-arrest-moos-pkg-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/wacky-world-of-jeanne-moos/

By the way, my card also lists the vaccine batch numbers that I had received (for each round); nothing like it there!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 06, 2021, 11:35:52 PM
Some comments which give some insight into the UK Government strategy this morning  from Zahawi, the minister responsible for vaccination.

QuoteI think the right thing is that we open schools . . . The way we do that is by protecting the most vulnerable, which is why my focus is on the booster programme. . . We've had the interim advices from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). That will help protect the most vulnerable from serious infection, and will actually help us transition this virus from pandemic to endemic status. . . and by next year hopefully transitioning this virus from pandemic to endemic,

I think (but I'm not 100% sure) that by endemic he means that the incidence is running at a more or less steady state, with a manageable level of infections etc. There will still be peeks and troughs in the numbers, but not much.

This is to all intents and purposes The Great Barrington Declaration strategy, with Endemic substituted for Herd Immunity. It is what some of the Barrington signatories are now proposing in fact, given that using vaccination to create herd immunity with delta is probably not currently achievable.  Targeted protection to produce an acceptable stable state.

I haven't thought about it enough to comment on whether it makes sense. In particular I've not explored how stable this endemic end state will be.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 07, 2021, 12:22:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 06, 2021, 11:35:52 PM
Some comments which give some insight into the UK Government strategy this morning  from Zahawi, the minister responsible for vaccination.

I think (but I'm not 100% sure) that by endemic he means that the incidence is running at a more or less steady state, with a manageable level of infections etc. There will still be peeks and troughs in the numbers, but not much.

This is to all intents and purposes The Great Barrington Declaration strategy, with Endemic substituted for Herd Immunity. It is what some of the Barrington signatories are now proposing in fact, given that using vaccination to create herd immunity with delta is probably not currently achievable.  Targeted protection to produce an acceptable stable state.

I haven't thought about it enough to comment on whether it makes sense. In particular I've not explored how stable this endemic end state will be.

Pandemic applies to many countries, endemic applies to one. If you now treat Covid19 as endemic in your country you view it as a constant presence in particular locations. Think of it as malaria in parts of Africa. You're never going to get rid of it. Yes it will kill some people but it's not really out of control and precautions can be taken. Another instance is influenza which is seasonally endemic and covers a multitude of countries. Yes, it kills people but it's still capable of being controlled.

In the UK, the endemic approach has wisely taken over. There are methods of keeping most of the population safe (vaccination, immunisation, etc) but life basically goes on normally. Occasionally this may elevate to 'epidemic' but simple controls that we've used for a long while will eventually cope with this situation.

Living in Australia, who for a long time tried to use an elimination process, was frustrating for me personally as I couldn't see how it could work. Our Federal big guys have now admitted that this is impossible and the march towards endemic should begin. Unfortunately, certain state premiers are still playing the elimination game.

The Kiwis still have their heads buried firmly in the sand and elimination is still the key. This is probably because the initial strong indoctrination of their population that this is the only path has struck home so firmly that most NZers can't see any other way. The government is struggling to convince their people that elimination won't work because they probably don't believe it themselves.

Sitting at home, watching full stadiums at EPL and MLB games shows me how much further ahead countries like the UK and USA are despite case figures in the thousands each day. Look beneath those figures and it's the unvaccinated that are dying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 07, 2021, 12:59:55 AM
Quote from: Holden on September 07, 2021, 12:22:52 AM


The Kiwis still have their heads buried firmly in the sand and elimination is still the key. This is probably because the initial strong indoctrination of their population that this is the only path has struck home so firmly that most NZers can't see any other way. The government is struggling to convince their people that elimination won't work because they probably don't believe it themselves.


Dude... we see all the ways because we have tv and the internet. We trust the PM because she's been smart both then and now. She's not "struggling" to convince anyone. Auckland isn't out of the elimination effort yet and it only takes one drongo to ruin it for everyone but I'm seriously hoping we can show all the skeptics that it can be done from single case to elimination in a matter of weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 01:25:52 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 07, 2021, 12:59:55 AM
Dude... we see all the ways because we have tv and the internet. We trust the PM because she's been smart both then and now. She's not "struggling" to convince anyone. Auckland isn't out of the elimination effort yet and it only takes one drongo to ruin it for everyone but I'm seriously hoping we can show all the skeptics that it can be done from single case to elimination in a matter of weeks.

The problem is, of course, where do you go from here? Are you guys now saying that you'll open up to the world again when you've vaccinated most of NZ? Or do you plan on living in a state of isolation for the foreseeable future?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:29:29 AM
Quote from: Holden on September 07, 2021, 12:22:52 AM
Pandemic applies to many countries, endemic applies to one.

There are three terms, pandemic, epidemic and endemic. Pandemic and Epidemic both refer to a condition where there is rapid spread of disease and number of new cases rapidly increases, the difference being that epidemic is restricted to one country or region and pandemic spans the globe. Endemic refers to a condition where the outbreak has stabilized, is widespread, but cases are not increasing.

It seems obvious that Covid-19 will become endemic. Hopefully the general proliferation of immunity due to vaccine and previous infections will result in fewer severe cases and deaths. I read that an 1890 pandemic is now thought by some to have been caused by a Coronivirus which is new endemic and generally produces a "common cold."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 07, 2021, 01:39:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 01:25:52 AM
The problem is, of course, where do you go from here? Are you guys now saying that you'll open up to the world again when you've vaccinated most of NZ? Or do you plan on living in a state of isolation for the foreseeable future?

Quite possibly opening up. The PM has stated that once we reach a peak vaccination level we won't be going through hard lockdiwns like the current one and will start "living with covid". I don't know what this will mean and imagine the specifics will be situational, but she's earned our trust and I'll follow where she leads.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 01:40:25 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:29:29 AM
There are three terms, pandemic, epidemic and endemic. Pandemic and Epidemic both refer to a condition where there is rapid spread of disease and number of new cases rapidly increases, the difference being that epidemic is restricted to one country or region and pandemic spans the globe. Endemic refers to a condition where the outbreak has stabilized, is widespread, but cases are not increasing.

It seems obvious that Covid-19 will become endemic. Hopefully the general proliferation of immunity due to vaccine and previous infections will result in fewer severe cases and deaths. I read that an 1890 pandemic is now thought by some to have been caused by a Coronivirus which is new endemic and generally produces a "common cold."

The problem is that the cost of open society and R=1 is many deaths. In the UK we're currently at 50K deaths a year, with a highly vaccinated population and an open society but closed schools. Opening schools will take it north of that. That's the price we're being asked to pay, the media is being groomed to hide it so for most people, out of sight out of mind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:49:47 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 01:40:25 AM
The problem is that the cost of open society and R=1 is many deaths. In the UK we're currently at 50K deaths a year, with a highly vaccinated population and an open society but closed schools. Opening schools will take it north of that. That's the price we're being asked to pay, the media is being groomed to hide it so for most people, out of sight out of mind.

The schools have to be open. Without schools we don't have a society. There is nothing more important than that. A generation of students has already been greatly harmed. Schools should be the last institution that is closed. Hopefully vaccination can be brought near complete, treatments will improve, and deaths and severe illness will be brought down. Perhaps hospital capacity will have to be increased.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 03:29:55 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:49:47 AM
The schools have to be open. Without schools we don't have a society. There is nothing more important than that. A generation of students has already been greatly harmed. Schools should be the last institution that is closed.

Nobody would disagree. Where there is disagreement is around two areas. First, how much to invest to make schools safer, in particular improving air quality. And second, when to say enough's enough and there's too much covid circulating  in a particular group of children to allow them to continue to attend there.

I note in passing that the degree of transmission from schools to the wider community, and the efficiency of the vaccines at preventing transmission, are both still uncertain as far as I can see.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:01:46 AM
Some good news here; we get the officially calculated R number here in DK every Tuesday, and today it went further down, to 0.7
Identified cases have been around 0.8 - 1.2. % of tests for several weeks, and hospitalizations stable, around 115 - 135.

But there's now a comprehensive, ordinary flu epidemic among very young children, and a warning for a likely increase in both the flu and corona in the autumn. The 90% adult corona vaccination seems to become a fact in late September.

(( Source in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/dagens-coronatal-overblik-over-smittede-indlagte-og-doede ))
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 07, 2021, 04:06:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:01:46 AM
Some good news here; we get the officially calculated R number here in DK every Tuesday, and today it went further down, to 0.7
Identified cases have been around 0.8 - 1.2. % of tests for several weeks, and hospitalizations stable, around 115 - 135.

But there's now a comprehensive, ordinary flu epidemic among very young children, and a warning for a likely increase in both the flu and corona in the autumn. The 90% adult corona vaccination seems to become a fact in late September.

(( Source in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/dagens-coronatal-overblik-over-smittede-indlagte-og-doede ))
"Yeah!" regarding your first comment, but the second?  A flu epidemic this time of year and in young kids?!  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 07, 2021, 04:15:54 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-07/israel-s-covid-surge-shows-the-world-what-s-coming-next

[maybe can get around paywall via Google]

As speculated above in the thread:

Since April, Israel has fallen from first to 33rd in Bloomberg's vaccine tracker of populations considered fully vaccinated. The program plateaued amid hesitancy from some in the Orthodox Jewish and Arab communities. About 61% of Israelis have been given two doses, lower than in European laggards earlier in the year such as France and Spain.

Although in the Arab [Palestinian?] community it might not be "hesitancy"...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:17:50 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 07, 2021, 04:06:07 AM
"Yeah!" regarding your first comment, but the second?  A flu epidemic this time of year and in young kids?!  :(

PD

Yes, there's a scientific explanation, but I haven't had the energy to get the details. It's not relevant for my immediate surroundings. But it's about the natural flu immunity having gone down due to corona restrictions, and it's now recommended that all children aged 2 - 6 get the flu vaccine, via 2x nose spray. Actually, in the year 2018, flu fatalities and hospitalizations were almost comparable to those of the later corona here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 07, 2021, 04:24:27 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 07, 2021, 04:15:54 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-07/israel-s-covid-surge-shows-the-world-what-s-coming-next

[maybe can get around paywall via Google]

As speculated above in the thread:

Since April, Israel has fallen from first to 33rd in Bloomberg's vaccine tracker of populations considered fully vaccinated. The program plateaued amid hesitancy from some in the Orthodox Jewish and Arab communities. About 61% of Israelis have been given two doses, lower than in European laggards earlier in the year such as France and Spain.

Although in the Arab [Palestinian?] community it might not be "hesitancy"...
Sorry to hear the bad news re fully vaccinated.  And regarding you final comment:  yup!

Quote from: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:17:50 AM
Yes, there's a scientific explanation, but I haven't had the energy to get the details. It's not relevant for my immediate surroundings. But it's about the natural flu immunity having gone down due to corona restrictions, and it's now recommended that all children ages 2 - 6 get  the flu vaccine, via 2x nose spray. Actually, in the year 2018, flu fatalities and hospitalizations were almost comparable to those of the later corona here.
Thank you for the further comments:  that makes sense now..less things like common colds too for all age-levels I bet due to less contact and less close contact with others.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 07, 2021, 09:18:24 AM
So, I guess the "let the virus run its course" approach doesn't quite work... Why didn't we think of that before?   ::)

No 10 not ruling out 'firebreak' lockdown if Covid cases rise (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/07/no-10-not-ruling-out-firebreak-lockdown-if-covid-cases-rise)


Ravi Gupta, a professor of clinical microbiology at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Nervtag advisory body, but speaking in a personal capacity, suggested the plans may not go far enough.

"I guess my view is that this situation was entirely predictable and to some extent preventable and many scientists have been ignored," he said.

"A firebreaker of a two-week half-term may help but is unlikely to be long enough to do the job, without additional measures including masking indoors and large gathering limitations," he said. "Vaccinating 12- to 15-year-olds should help curb transmission but we have left it pretty late."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 07, 2021, 09:52:29 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:29:29 AM
There are three terms, pandemic, epidemic and endemic. Pandemic and Epidemic both refer to a condition where there is rapid spread of disease and number of new cases rapidly increases, the difference being that epidemic is restricted to one country or region and pandemic spans the globe. Endemic refers to a condition where the outbreak has stabilized, is widespread, but cases are not increasing.

It seems obvious that Covid-19 will become endemic. Hopefully the general proliferation of immunity due to vaccine and previous infections will result in fewer severe cases and deaths. I read that an 1890 pandemic is now thought by some to have been caused by a Coronivirus which is new endemic and generally produces a "common cold."

I don't know how 'endemic' can be applied to Covid. The term refers to a condition (like malaria) that is established and permanent to a region/country/continent, or to species that are found naturally in one place and one place only - like kangaroos in Australia, or edelweiss in mountains of Europe and Asia. By definition, if the coronavirus is spread throughout the world it can't be endemic to a specific area.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 10:11:26 AM
Quote from: André on September 07, 2021, 09:52:29 AM
I don't know how 'endemic' can be applied to Covid. The term refers to a condition (like malaria) that is established and permanent to a region/country/continent, or to species that are found naturally in one place and one place only - like kangaroos in Australia, or edelweiss in mountains of Europe and Asia. By definition, if the coronavirus is spread throughout the world it can't be endemic to a specific area.

In epidemiology the word endemic has a specialized meaning. A disease is endemic if transmission remains at a steady state with no external inputs. Often this happens because everyone gets it once, then has immunity to it, regulating transmission.

Some people believe this is the end game for Covid-19.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endemic_(epidemiology)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 11:18:34 AM
Quote from: Que on September 07, 2021, 09:18:24 AM
So, I guess the "let the virus run its course" approach doesn't quite work... Why didn't we think of that before?   ::)

No 10 not ruling out 'firebreak' lockdown if Covid cases rise (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/07/no-10-not-ruling-out-firebreak-lockdown-if-covid-cases-rise)


Ravi Gupta, a professor of clinical microbiology at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Nervtag advisory body, but speaking in a personal capacity, suggested the plans may not go far enough.

"I guess my view is that this situation was entirely predictable and to some extent preventable and many scientists have been ignored," he said.

"A firebreaker of a two-week half-term may help but is unlikely to be long enough to do the job, without additional measures including masking indoors and large gathering limitations," he said. "Vaccinating 12- to 15-year-olds should help curb transmission but we have left it pretty late."


Is there any evidence from around the world that firebreaks do any good?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 11:20:50 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:01:46 AM
Some good news here; we get the officially calculated R number here in DK every Tuesday, and today it went further down, to 0.7
Identified cases have been around 0.8 - 1.2. % of tests for several weeks, and hospitalizations stable, around 115 - 135.

But there's now a comprehensive, ordinary flu epidemic among very young children, and a warning for a likely increase in both the flu and corona in the autumn. The 90% adult corona vaccination seems to become a fact in late September.

(( Source in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/dagens-coronatal-overblik-over-smittede-indlagte-og-doede ))
So am I right to think that schools and the rest of society are open? People can meet freely and they can go to large events? Are there vaccine passports to go to shopping centres or restaurants or football matches or the theatre?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 11:46:31 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 11:20:50 AM
So am I right to think that schools and the rest of society are open? People can meet freely and they can go to large events? Are there vaccine passports to go to shopping centres or restaurants or football matches or the theatre?

Basically almost all restrictions were abolished on the 1st of September. There are no limits to gatherings indoors or outdoors, for example. At discoteques, you'll have to present a corona pass, though. But there are some general recommendations, such as keeping a certain distance etc. In schools children aren't even obliged to stay at home if they've been in contact with an infected person; it's just recommended that they get a test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 07, 2021, 12:03:27 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 01:49:47 AM
Schools should be the last institution that is closed.

As a teacher I agree.  The covid slide is very real.  Virtual instruction, the lack of community building and lack of hands-on activities makes remote learning a challenge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 07, 2021, 12:35:59 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 07, 2021, 10:11:26 AM
In epidemiology the word endemic has a specialized meaning. A disease is endemic if transmission remains at a steady state with no external inputs. Often this happens because everyone gets it once, then has immunity to it, regulating transmission.

Some people believe this is the end game for Covid-19.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endemic_(epidemiology)

Very interesting, I didn't know there was a specific epidemiologic meaning for the term. Thanks for the correction.

From that wiki article:

Quote
For an infection that relies on person-to-person transmission, to be endemic, each person who becomes infected with the disease must pass it on to one other person on average. Assuming a completely susceptible population, that means that the basic reproduction number (R0) of the infection must equal one. In a population with some immune individuals, the basic reproduction number multiplied by the proportion of susceptible individuals in the population (S) must be one. This takes account of the probability of each individual to whom the disease may be transmitted being susceptible to it, effectively discounting the immune sector of the population. So, for a disease to be in an endemic steady state it is:
Rº×S=1

In this way, the infection neither dies out nor does the number of infected people increase exponentially but the infection is said to be in an endemic steady state. An infection that starts as an epidemic will eventually either die out (with the possibility of it resurging in a theoretically predictable cyclical manner) or reach the endemic steady state, depending on a number of factors, including the virulence of the disease and its mode of transmission.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 07, 2021, 12:53:22 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 07, 2021, 12:03:27 PM
As a teacher I agree.  The covid slide is very real.  Virtual instruction, the lack of community building and lack of hands-on activities makes remote learning a challenge.

Verily.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 07, 2021, 01:34:58 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 11:46:31 AM
Basically almost all restrictions were abolished on the 1st of September. There are no limits to gatherings indoors or outdoors, for example. At discoteques, you'll have to present a corona pass, though. But there are some general recommendations, such as keeping a certain distance etc. In schools children aren't even obliged to stay at home if they've been in contact with an infected person; it's just recommended that they get a test.

That's very positive news then, light at the end of the tunnel - modulo unexpected nasty variants, vaccine wane, vaccine long term side effects . . . and rampant inflation and unemployment.

I think we should all just get drunk now
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 08, 2021, 07:02:53 PM
Coronavirus Updates: Cases in children rise to record levels
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 09, 2021, 03:22:55 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 08, 2021, 07:02:53 PM
Coronavirus Updates: Cases in children rise to record levels
:(  :'(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 09, 2021, 09:00:34 AM
Apparently there are at least two types of Ivermectin: For horses and for humans. Some doctors recommend the human version for Covid treatment, but there is no reliable evidence for it to work at this point and it seems some doctors are just making money with this "scam". The crazy part is some people are taking the horse version of Ivermectin and that is really dangerous, even deadly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 09, 2021, 09:05:40 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 09, 2021, 09:00:34 AM
Apparently there are at least two types of Ivermectin: For horses and for humans. Some doctors recommend the human version for Covid treatment, but there is no reliable evidence for it to work at this point and it seems some doctors are just making money with this "scam". The crazy part is some people are taking the horse version of Ivermectin and that is really dangerous, even deadly!

Given the quality of info for the right-wingers taking Ivermectin, they'd be better off drinking from the toilet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 09, 2021, 10:04:19 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 07, 2021, 04:17:50 AM
Yes, there's a scientific explanation, but I haven't had the energy to get the details. It's not relevant for my immediate surroundings. But it's about the natural flu immunity having gone down due to corona restrictions, and it's now recommended that all children aged 2 - 6 get the flu vaccine, via 2x nose spray. Actually, in the year 2018, flu fatalities and hospitalizations were almost comparable to those of the later corona here.

The unusually early and big rise of an RS virus - which is not a corona virus, and has resulted in 700 cases in just a week among small children - is met with concern here, and straining some hospitals. Thankfully, the virus is very rarely fatal, though.

It is also considered a warning of what might come later, as regards other autumnal flu epidemics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_respiratory_syncytial_virus
(source, but in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-09-09-boerneafdeling-lagt-ned-af-rs-virus-aflyser-operationer-og-hjaelp-til-spaedboern)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 09, 2021, 12:16:55 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 09, 2021, 10:04:19 AM
The unusually early and big rise of an RS virus - which is not a corona virus, and has resulted in 700 cases in just a week among small children - is met with concern here, and straining some hospitals. Thankfully, the virus is very rarely fatal, though.

It is also considered a warning of what might come later, as regards other autumnal flu epidemics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_respiratory_syncytial_virus
(source, but in Danish https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-09-09-boerneafdeling-lagt-ned-af-rs-virus-aflyser-operationer-og-hjaelp-til-spaedboern)

Is this, and the flu in kids you mentioned, happening elsewhere? I haven't heard about it in Scotland for example, where schools have been open for some time now. By coincidence here's the latest government report on respiratory diseases in the UK, released today

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016276/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w36.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 09, 2021, 09:13:44 PM
There aren't stories about it elsewhere that I've encountered, and I see from the summary in your report, that it's not (yet???) happening in your country either. But unless it will strain hospitals a lot, it does seem less serious than corona.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 09, 2021, 09:20:52 PM
I spoke to another nurse today. This one works in the ER and I asked her about COVID cases and she said, like another nurse mentioned to me several weeks ago, that the rate of those unvaccinated people getting COVID is on the rise and while she's seen several vaccinated people come in with COVID, she said those who were vaccinated have fared much better than the unvaccinated. She looked tired as hell and relieved that she was off the clock. I'll have to have a chat with one of my neighbors who lives up the street from me. She's a registered nurse, but I don't ever get the opportunity to talk with her much. I'll have to ask her about her experience now with the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. Anyway, I can't imagine what all of these people have been through in the medical field during this time, but even though none of them are reading this, I thank them for their service. They're the real heroes in all of this --- out on the frontlines everyday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 10, 2021, 06:33:56 AM
US COVID-19 hospitalizations at 13.2%; TSA doubles fines for people who refuse to wear masks at airports
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 10, 2021, 06:53:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 10, 2021, 06:33:56 AM
US COVID-19 hospitalizations at 13.2%; TSA doubles fines for people who refuse to wear masks at airports

This maybe a nitpicky thing, but please list your source when you post percentages, Karl. I have no idea where you got that information.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 10, 2021, 06:56:11 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on September 10, 2021, 06:53:53 AM
This maybe a nitpicky thing, but please list your source when you post percentages, Karl. I have no idea where you got that information.

By Globe staff Updated September 10, 2021, 2 minutes ago
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on September 10, 2021, 06:56:50 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 10, 2021, 06:56:11 AM
By Globe staff Updated September 10, 2021, 2 minutes ago

Ah, thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 10, 2021, 07:01:40 AM
Citing high shot rates, Danes end COVID-19 restriction

By JAN M. OLSEN The Associated Press, Updated September 10, 2021, 5:45 a.m.

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — After 548 days with restrictions to limit the spread of COVID-19, Denmark's high vaccination rate has enabled the Scandinavian country to become one of the first European Union nations to lift all domestic restrictions.

The return to normality has been gradual, but as of Friday, the digital pass — a proof of having been vaccinated — is no longer required when entering night clubs, making it the last virus safeguard to fall.

More than 80% of people above the age of 12 have had the two shots.

"I wouldn't say it is too early. We have opened the door but we have also said that we can close it if needed," Soeren Riis Paludan, a professor of virology with the Aarhus University in Denmark's second largest city, told The Associated Press.

As of midnight, the Danish government no longer considers COVID-19 "a socially critical disease." Health Minister Magnus Heunicke said Aug. 27 that "the epidemic is under control" but warned: "we are not out of the epidemic" and the government will act as needed if necessary.

The tipping point in Denmark to start easing restrictions came when a majority in the age group of 50+ had the two shots, Riis Paludan said.

Since Aug. 14, a face mask on public transportation is no longer mandatory. On Sept. 1, night clubs reopened, limits on public gatherings were removed and it was no longer mandatory to show the pass when one wanted to be seated inside restaurants, or go to soccer games, fitness centers or hairdresser.

However, the face mask or shield are still mandatory at airports and people are advised to wear one when at the doctor's, test centers or hospitals. Distancing is still recommended and strict entry restrictions still apply for non Danes at the borders. The outbreak is still considered "an ordinary dangerous illness."

"The ghost of corona sits in the back of our head," said Frank Oestergaard, a patron in a downtown Copenhagen restaurant.

After more than a year, several European countries are starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel, but with caveats. Some have lifted restrictions but will introduce a vaccination passport. Others expect to do so soon. And in some places, there are few restrictions and they are not respected.

On July 19, the British government lifted remaining legal restrictions for England, though it still plans to introduce a vaccination passport for entry into nightclubs and other crowded venues at the end of September.

In Denmark's neighbor Sweden, which has stood out among European nations for its comparatively hands-off response to the pandemic, the government said earlier this month that most restrictions, including the ceiling for private and public gatherings and the advice to work from home, will be removed as of Sept. 29.

The Scandinavian country has not gone into lockdowns or closed businesses, relying instead on citizens' sense of civic duty to control infection. According to official figures, 70% of people over the age of 15 have gotten both shots and nearly 82 % have received the first shot.

And despite a surge, most of the Balkan countries practically have no restrictions, and those which are in place are not respected.

In late May, the Danish government presented the passport app featuring a QR code and a green bar if the person has been vaccinated twice or recently tested negative. A paper version also was available. People either had to scan the code or flash it before entering an airport, a harbor, a train station, a hairdresser or an eatery.

While in many European countries there were pockets of resistance such passes, people used it all the time in Denmark because people trust authorities, Riis Paludan said.

Armed with their pass, people were able to get a haircut, have a drink with friends or attend a cultural event. "It was getting one's freedom back instead of having to sit at home in isolation," laughed Oestergaard.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on September 10, 2021, 11:21:15 PM
Norway has now tipped the 90% first dose vaccination rate for those above 18 years, with 79% fully vaccinated. The 16 and 17 year old are currently being vaccinated with 80% having had their first dose in my hometown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 01:39:33 AM
We're getting a bit clearer about the UK plan.

In Scotland this week 2.2% have covid, last week it was 1.3% and the week before it was 0.7%. A doubling time of about 7+ days.

Scotland is completely open, the schools are functioning pretty well as before COVID, and people are working from the office.

At this doubling rate, in a few weeks the virus is going to have difficulty finding fuel.

Can we stick it out? 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 11, 2021, 02:28:06 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 01:39:33 AM
We're getting a bit clearer about the UK plan.

In Scotland this week 2.2% have covid, last week it was 1.3% and the week before it was 0.7%. A doubling time of about 7+ days.
(...)

Supposedly these are percentages of those tested, not an estimate of the population as a whole?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 11, 2021, 02:29:50 AM
Quote from: The new erato on September 10, 2021, 11:21:15 PM
Norway has now tipped the 90% first dose vaccination rate for those above 18 years, with 79% fully vaccinated. The 16 and 17 year old are currently being vaccinated with 80% having had their first dose in my hometown.

Well done, you might very well end up with better results than DK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 02:46:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 11, 2021, 02:28:06 AM
Supposedly these are percentages of those tested, not an estimate of the population as a whole?

Population estimates from ONS -- this is the latest.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/10september2021
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 11, 2021, 03:22:19 AM
Quote from: The new erato on September 10, 2021, 11:21:15 PM
Norway has now tipped the 90% first dose vaccination rate for those above 18 years, with 79% fully vaccinated. The 16 and 17 year old are currently being vaccinated with 80% having had their first dose in my hometown.

Sound good.

Looking at vaccinated people by age groups in Finland there is a "dip" in first doseses for the 25-29 age group. I wonder if other countries has similar dip. It looks like 25-29 year olds are most hesitant to take the vaccines. Maybe they are less under the influence of their parents than for example 20-24 year olds, but still young and feeling Covid is not dangerous for them? Another interesting thing is that the second doses didn't reach the first doses level in the older age groups who have had plenty to time to get both jabs (almost waiting for the third!). Maybe the "sore arm" of the first dose was too much for some to experience twice?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 11, 2021, 04:17:54 AM
My local hospital is nearly at capacity with 75 beds filled, 28 of which are for covid.  Doesn't surprise me.  The county I live in has one of the lowest vaccination rates in the entire country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2021, 04:47:36 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 11, 2021, 04:17:54 AM
My local hospital is nearly at capacity with 75 beds filled, 28 of which are for covid.  Doesn't surprise me.  The county I live in has one of the lowest vaccination rates in the entire country.
Very sorry to hear that Dave.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on September 11, 2021, 06:08:02 AM
25 - 39 lags slightly behind in Norway as well. And immigrants, workers and refugees are seriously behind. Poles eg only at 30%

Edit: This was ro 71dB. Ans sorry about that Dave.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 11, 2021, 06:25:03 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 02:46:25 AM
Population estimates from ONS -- this is the latest.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/10september2021

Not terribly easy to understand for a foreigner, but yes, it does seem to be an estimate for the entire population, which is about 5.5 mio. That's a surprisingly high share, if correct. I checked today's results in Scotland, and they are about 11% positive among 45,000 tests, 985 hospitalized, 83 in ICU, and 10 fatalities.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 06:49:12 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 11, 2021, 06:25:03 AM
Not terribly easy to understand for a foreigner, but yes, it does seem to be an estimate for the entire population, which is about 5.5 mio. That's a surprisingly high share, if correct. I checked today's results in Scotland, and they are about 11% positive among 45,000 tests, 985 hospitalized, 83 in ICU, and 10 fatalities.

So the strategy here seems to be to maximise infections now to create widespread population immunity. That will put pressure on the hospitals, hence the urgency to get the peak over with well before the start of the winter flu season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 11, 2021, 07:03:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 06:49:12 AM
So the strategy here seems to be to maximise infections now to create widespread population immunity.

I pity those among the infected who will wind up living with "Long COVID"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 11, 2021, 07:09:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 11, 2021, 07:03:43 AM
I pity those among the infected who will wind up living with "Long COVID"

Many of the people infected now will be children, because they have no vaccine immunity and they're all over each other in school. Fortunately long covid doesn't appear to be a specially serious problem for them

https://covid.joinzoe.com/post/long-covid-children

Among adults it could be more serious of course. I've not looked into it in fact, but I know that some people think it could be one of the major weaknesses of the UK approach.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 11, 2021, 07:40:22 AM
About a month ago (two?) Quebec and Ontario were around 100-200 new cases per day. In the last 4 weeks it has gone up steadily, to about 1000/day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 12, 2021, 12:38:24 PM
Quote from: Que on August 22, 2021, 10:38:41 PM
Meanwhile in Europe, despite ongoing vaccinations things are still not looking better on the spreading of the virus:


(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w32_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=sg8xeTWN)

(https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/styles/is_large/public/images/2021w35_COVID19_EU_EEA_Subnational_Combined_traffic.png?itok=SptmsiKq)

Still doesn't look terribly good...
The situation in France, Spain, Danmark, Norway and Sweden seems to have improved, but Germany, Austria, Slovenia, Croatia and Romania look worse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 13, 2021, 07:07:11 AM
Reportedly, large Danish companies are planning to move their production in China back to Europe/Eastern Europe, partly because corona has made logistics more insecure, costly, and vulnerable.

Could become a trend, perhaps.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 13, 2021, 09:11:10 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 13, 2021, 07:07:11 AM
Reportedly, large Danish companies are planning to move their production in China back to Europe/Eastern Europe, partly because corona has made logistics more insecure, costly, and vulnerable.

Could become a trend, perhaps.

Oh, definitely. Here there are supply disruptions in new cars, and even new bikes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 13, 2021, 09:14:12 AM
Personally I've been waiting for 6 weeks for a very ordinary spare part for my primary bicycle ... which is highly unusual. It might take months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 13, 2021, 11:34:30 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 13, 2021, 09:14:12 AM
Personally I've been waiting for 6 weeks for a very ordinary spare part for my primary bicycle ... which is highly unusual. It might take months.

I read somewhere that the bicycle spare part shortage won't ease until 2024!  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 13, 2021, 11:46:30 AM
Yes, an acquaintance of mine expects waiting a couple of years, before the delivery of a luxury bike he ordered. A member of my family owns a bike repair shop and tells about the same problems. Luckily, I had an OK second bicycle too, also suitable for touring.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 13, 2021, 09:49:30 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/japan-overtakes-u-s-on-vaccination-after-starting-months-later

Japan has given first doses of the Covid-19 vaccine to 63.6% of its population, surpassing the U.S. in the proportion of those who have had at least one shot of the vaccine despite starting months behind.

The island nation's progress now puts the U.S. last among Group of Seven nations when it comes to the proportion of the population with at least one dose, after vaccine hesitancy squandered the country's head start. About 63.1% of the U.S. has had at least their first shot, and 53.8% are fully vaccinated.


MAGA!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 14, 2021, 03:33:50 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 13, 2021, 09:49:30 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/japan-overtakes-u-s-on-vaccination-after-starting-months-later

Japan has given first doses of the Covid-19 vaccine to 63.6% of its population, surpassing the U.S. in the proportion of those who have had at least one shot of the vaccine despite starting months behind.

The island nation's progress now puts the U.S. last among Group of Seven nations when it comes to the proportion of the population with at least one dose, after vaccine hesitancy squandered the country's head start. About 63.1% of the U.S. has had at least their first shot, and 53.8% are fully vaccinated.


MAGA!

I feel bad for Americans for being constantly humiliated internationally in various ways. Japan has done good job recently, because back in spring they where so much behind even Europe. Sadly this is not only humiliating for the Americans, but people are dying for no good reason and hospitals are full because of "out-of-control" anti-vaxx propaganda. The one time healthcare is "free" for Americans, a large portion of the country reject it. At least horse dewormer sells well...  ::)

Make America Goofy Again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 14, 2021, 08:19:39 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 14, 2021, 03:33:50 AM
I feel bad for Americans for being constantly humiliated internationally in various ways. Japan has done good job recently, because back in spring they where so much behind even Europe. Sadly this is not only humiliating for the Americans, but people are dying for no good reason and hospitals are full because of "out-of-control" anti-vaxx propaganda. The one time healthcare is "free" for Americans, a large portion of the country reject it. At least horse dewormer sells well...  ::)

Make America Goofy Again.

Well, the US has the dopiest populace of the Group of 7, so it's only fitting that we rank last on the vacc. scale.  :blank:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 14, 2021, 09:40:53 AM
Alabama had no room re ICU beds (called 43 hospitals) due to Covid, finally found one but it was too late, for the man, an antiques dealer who had had some serious heart issues, died.  His family is now begging people to get vaccinated and trying to get them to understand the strain that they are putting on the hospital system.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 14, 2021, 10:36:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 14, 2021, 09:40:53 AM
Alabama had no room re ICU beds (called 43 hospitals) due to Covid, finally found one but it was too late, for the man, an antiques dealer who had had some serious heart issues, died.  His family is now begging people to get vaccinated and trying to get them to understand the strain that they are putting on the hospital system.  :(

PD

Ghastly, absolutely ghastly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 14, 2021, 02:16:15 PM
Some nuggets from Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-12/israel-eyes-fourth-dose-u-k-drops-vaccine-passes-virus-update

Ohio Governor Backs Masks in Schools (4:15 p.m. NY)
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he'd impose a mask mandate in schools in response to a 2,000% increase in coronavirus cases among school-aged children since early August and hospitals getting overwhelmed, but the state legislature -- controlled by his Republican colleagues -- would just repeal it.


Montana's Biggest Hospital 'in Crisis' (1:50 p.m. NY)
Montana's largest hospital is "in crisis," a top official said. Billings Clinic was caring for 70 Covid patients, the most since the first week of December, with overflow intensive-care unit beds added as the delta variant spreads, the Billings Gazette reported.

Typically the ICU has 28 beds, but more than 40 are now squeezed into the facility. As of Monday, there were 25 patients at the ICU level, with 13 on ventilators and six in overflow beds.

"It's gotten to the point that we are in a crisis," Billings Clinic Chief Executive Officer Scott Ellner said. Staff are "tired and incredibly frustrated," he said. "We're worried that the public doesn't understand."

DeSantis: I Don't Recall Conspiracy Remark (12:30 p.m. NY)

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said he doesn't recall a speaker at one of his events on Monday falsely telling a crowd that the Covid-19 vaccine "changes your RNA."

Darris Friend, a Gainesville employee who rejects his city's vaccine rules, was a featured speaker at the rally in Newberry, Florida, organized by DeSantis to criticize mandates. Friend delivered the remarks behind a podium with the official state seal, directly next to DeSantis. The governor watched Friend as he spoke, but after the conspiracy-theory comment DeSantis made no effort to correct it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 15, 2021, 05:09:13 AM
U.S. hospitals in crisis as Idaho rations care (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/09/15/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 15, 2021, 06:29:00 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 14, 2021, 02:16:15 PM
DeSantis: I Don't Recall Conspiracy Remark (12:30 p.m. NY)

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said he doesn't recall a speaker at one of his events on Monday falsely telling a crowd that the Covid-19 vaccine "changes your RNA."

Darris Friend, a Gainesville employee who rejects his city's vaccine rules, was a featured speaker at the rally in Newberry, Florida, organized by DeSantis to criticize mandates. Friend delivered the remarks behind a podium with the official state seal, directly next to DeSantis. The governor watched Friend as he spoke, but after the conspiracy-theory comment DeSantis made no effort to correct it.


The left now calls him by the nicknames DeathSantis and DeathSatan because of the evil way he has handled the pandemic in Florida. Beware Americans, this lunatic wants to be the president one day...  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 07:28:02 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 15, 2021, 06:29:00 AM
The left now calls him by the nicknames DeathSantis and DeathSatan because of the evil way he has handled the pandemic in Florida. Beware Americans, this lunatic wants to be the president one day...  ???

You should be careful about assuming that all GQP Cheeto Mussolinists are idiots, though doubtless many are.
De Santis, for instance, is a graduate of Yale and Harvard Law School.
Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, two of the most repellent Tea Partyites and apparent drooling mouth-breathers, also have Ivy degrees (both undergrad - Stanford in Hawley's case - and law school) and distinguished academic records.

One might theorize that these worthies have made certain utility-based calculations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 15, 2021, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 15, 2021, 06:29:00 AM
The left now calls him by the nicknames DeathSantis and DeathSatan

Please show ne where what you mistakenly call "the left" are saying these non-punning non-jokes worthy of a very slow ten year old. Because a Google search isn't finding then for me and the left I know is capable of actual wit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 08:18:08 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 15, 2021, 08:06:44 AM
Please show me where what you mistakenly call "the left" are saying these non-punning non-jokes worthy of a very slow ten year old. Because a Google search isn't finding then for me and the left I know is capable of actual wit.

Forget it. This dude (ironically) follows GQP logic...no doubt somebody on Facebook, Youtube or Twitter posted that "'the left' is doing/saying such-and-such"...THEREFORE IT HAPPENED!!!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 15, 2021, 08:33:50 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 07:28:02 AM
One might theorize that these worthies have made certain utility-based calculations.

Yes there is a calculated aspect to how Paul, Cruz, Santis etc. engage with their base.  It is not just what they say and how they say it, they adopt a certain persona which is not necessarily their true self.  More like acting a part in a play.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 15, 2021, 08:52:23 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 15, 2021, 08:33:50 AM
Yes there is a calculated aspect to how Paul, Cruz, Santis etc. engage with their base.  It is not just what they say and how they say it, they adopt a certain persona which is not necessarily their true self.  More like acting a part in a play.

True, but it's not a flattering reflection on either their true self or their integrity
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 15, 2021, 08:54:29 AM
The pandemic marks another grim milestone: 1 in 500 Americans have died of covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 15, 2021, 09:03:11 AM
Quote from: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 07:28:02 AM
You should be careful about assuming that all GQP Cheeto Mussolinists are idiots, though doubtless many are.
De Santis, for instance, is a graduate of Yale and Harvard Law School.
Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, two of the most repellent Tea Partyites and apparent drooling mouth-breathers, also have Ivy degrees (both undergrad - Stanford in Hawley's case - and law school) and distinguished academic records.

One might theorize that these worthies have made certain utility-based calculations.

Where did I call DeSantis an idiot? I called him lunatic. Completely different. Also, being a graduate of Yale doesn't tell much. Rich daddy I guess?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 15, 2021, 09:07:47 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 15, 2021, 08:06:44 AM
Please show ne where what you mistakenly call "the left" are saying these non-punning non-jokes worthy of a very slow ten year old. Because a Google search isn't finding then for me and the left I know is capable of actual wit.

Sorry, your Google searches suck.

https://hillreporter.com/defying-deathsantis-another-red-county-in-florida-rejects-governors-anti-mask-mandate-110221
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 15, 2021, 10:58:07 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 15, 2021, 05:09:13 AM
U.S. hospitals in crisis as Idaho rations care (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/09/15/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/)
Karl,

I didn't access your specific article but google about Idaho and Covid and found this--what's going on in Idaho PLUS its impact on the state of Washington.   :( >:(

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/northwest/idahos-covid-crisis-is-straining-hospitals-across-the-border-in-washington/

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 15, 2021, 11:55:14 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 15, 2021, 10:58:07 AM
Karl,

I didn't access your specific article but google about Idaho and Covid and found this--what's going on in Idaho PLUS its impact on the state of Washington.   :( >:(

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/northwest/idahos-covid-crisis-is-straining-hospitals-across-the-border-in-washington/

PD



Yowch, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on September 15, 2021, 12:43:56 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 15, 2021, 08:06:44 AM
Please show ne where what you mistakenly call "the left" are saying these non-punning non-jokes worthy of a very slow ten year old. Because a Google search isn't finding then for me and the left I know is capable of actual wit.

I've seen that label for DeSantis quite a bit for the last few months, and mostly from what might be called Democratic mainstream, not the Left.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 02:29:37 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-15/montana-s-largest-hospital-close-to-rationing-life-saving-care

Montana's largest hospital is considering crisis standards of care procedures that grant authority to decide who receives life-saving treatment, the Billings Gazette reported Wednesday.

Intensive care unit capacity at Billings Clinic is at 150% as Covid-19 rages, the newspaper said.

"If it comes to a point where we have to make those incredibly [difficult] life or death situations, we will have an objective team that will be available to provide council and make those decisions," said Laurie Smith, chief nursing officer.


MAGA!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 15, 2021, 07:08:38 PM
Quote from: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 02:29:37 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-15/montana-s-largest-hospital-close-to-rationing-life-saving-care

Montana's largest hospital is considering crisis standards of care procedures that grant authority to decide who receives life-saving treatment, the Billings Gazette reported Wednesday.

Intensive care unit capacity at Billings Clinic is at 150% as Covid-19 rages, the newspaper said.

"If it comes to a point where we have to make those incredibly [difficult] life or death situations, we will have an objective team that will be available to provide council and make those decisions," said Laurie Smith, chief nursing officer.


MAGA!

Basically Red states now have death panels. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 15, 2021, 07:12:25 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 15, 2021, 07:08:38 PM
Basically Red states now have death panels. :(

Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on September 15, 2021, 11:14:53 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-16/putin-says-tens-of-covid-19-cases-in-his-kremlin-entourage
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 16, 2021, 06:39:29 AM
1800+ Americans perishing daily of COVID-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 17, 2021, 05:16:11 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 15, 2021, 10:58:07 AM
Karl,

I didn't access your specific article but google about Idaho and Covid and found this--what's going on in Idaho PLUS its impact on the state of Washington.   :( >:(

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/northwest/idahos-covid-crisis-is-straining-hospitals-across-the-border-in-washington/

PD

Yes, PBS Newshour last night had an interview with the director of a major eastern Washington (Spokane, I think) hospital who said their facilities were stretched pretty nearly to the max with both their own patients and with overflow from over the Idaho border, to the point where they expect soon to have to implement emergency standards of care. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 17, 2021, 05:29:53 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 17, 2021, 05:16:11 AM
Yes, PBS Newshour last night had an interview with the director of a major eastern Washington (Spokane, I think) hospital who said their facilities were stretched pretty nearly to the max with both their own patients and with overflow from over the Idaho border, to the point where they expect soon to have to implement emergency standards of care. :(
God help us!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 17, 2021, 04:19:29 PM
New anti-vaxxer's way of fighting Covid: Snorting and gargling Iodine.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 18, 2021, 06:38:10 AM
A few caveats to consider as we look at alarming coronavirus data from schools this year

By Felicia Gans Globe Staff, Updated September 17, 2021, 1:53 p.m.

State education leaders on Thursday released the first weekly coronavirus case report of the year from schools — 1,230 cases among students and 190 among staff for Monday through Wednesday. For many, the numbers feel significantly higher than last year's reports, during which the highest-ever student case count was 1,095 the week of April 8 to 14.

While alarming for some, experts say the increase in the school population, rise in pooled testing, and spread of the Delta variant made the high case count relatively expected.

Here are the caveats to consider, experts say:

The in-person student population has grown

At the end of the 2020-21 academic year, when nearly all schools had been required to return to full-time, in-person learning, the state still had only an estimated 735,000 students attending school. Families had the option last year to keep students in remote-only learning models, and thousands chose that approach.

Cases among remote-learning students and remote-working staff members were not tracked by the state.

This year, the state has taken away the option for schools to offer remote learning to families, apart from narrow exceptions that existed prior to the pandemic. As a result, the state's in-person student body has grown to about 920,000 students.

The way data is being collected has changed

Last year, cases only were reported for students and staff members who had been in a district building within seven days prior to testing positive. This year, cases are being reported for any student enrolled and staff member employed by the school district, regardless of whether they've been inside the building.

Local school districts will be required to report positive cases among students and staff members to this state this year. That requirement began for the 2020-21 school year in mid-October 2020.

More schools are participating in COVID-19 testing

More than double the number of public and private schools in Massachusetts are participating in some form of COVID-19 testing this year, compared to last year, according to the state. All testing is provided to schools at no cost to the district.

This academic year, more than 2,200 public and private schools are using rapid testing, pooled testing, a "test and stay" program for testing close contacts, or a combination of all three. Among public schools, 993 are signed up for all three modes, as of this week.

"Just as we are wearing masks, just as we are encouraging vaccinations, this is a mitigation strategy," said Dr. Safdar Medina, the pediatric director at Tri-River Family Health Center in Uxbridge and a professor at the University of Massachusetts. "Identifying a case is really the key to prevent that case from spreading."

Medina encouraged every family to opt in to pooled testing, noting that it's a way to promptly identify and isolate people who test positive and to prevent in-school transmission. In some communities, getting families to participate in the program has been one of the largest obstacles.

In Boston, for instance, where about 50,000 students are enrolled, less than one-third, or 16,512, have opted in through the district's digital portal. Some have filled out paper consent forms that have not yet been uploaded, according to the district. Pooled testing is available at all 123 Boston Public Schools; it began at some schools on Thursday and will start at others next week.

Delta is more transmissible

The Delta variant of the coronavirus is more transmissible than earlier variants, so as Delta causes a rise in cases community wide, cases will inevitably increase among the school population, too.

"We've always seen that what you see in the school is going to be a reflection of what you see in the community," said Dr. Shira Doron, an infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center. "It is a reflection of the fact that we're in a Delta era, not a reflection of something that's really dangerous about schools themselves."

High numbers aren't necessarily a cause for alarm

"We don't need the numbers to be as low in September as they were in May to prevent morbidity and mortality, which is ultimately what we want to prevent," Doron said.

Because older students and all staff members have had the opportunity to get vaccinated, schools can tolerate a larger amount of risk without putting children in harm's way, Doron said.

"Is the goal to prevent all person-to-person transmission in school? I don't think it's possible this year, and I don't think it needs to be," Doron said, but added it's important for governmental bodies to define what the goal should be.

"What number do we want to see?"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 18, 2021, 01:50:44 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 18, 2021, 06:38:10 AM


"We don't need the numbers to be as low in September as they were in May to prevent morbidity and mortality, which is ultimately what we want to prevent," Doron said.

Because older students and all staff members have had the opportunity to get vaccinated, schools can tolerate a larger amount of risk without putting children in harm's way, Doron said.

"Is the goal to prevent all person-to-person transmission in school? I don't think it's possible this year, and I don't think it needs to be," Doron said, but added it's important for governmental bodies to define what the goal should be.

"What number do we want to see?"

One thing which I think we're seeing in the uk is that people don't much care about the numbers: they don't care about how many people die or how many children have to go to hospital, apart from muttering something platitudinous like "oh how terrible!" Numbers are boring, they're easily hidden or put out of mind, and anyway it's always someone else who dies or who gets seriously ill.

What people care about is having the freedom to earn and spend and party and take a holiday, so long as they're getting that, God's in his heaven and all's right with the world.

So my feeling is that in the US, as here, the numbers "we want to see" is entirely driven by the maximum the health system can handle.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 20, 2021, 03:20:21 AM
The can of dewormers

I was one who a while ago laughed at people taking "horse dewormers", but now my attitude has changed after hearing more information and having a more nyanced picture. I am surprised how badly Ivermectin has been dealt with in the media. I haven't seen anyone give the "whole picture" of it. It is like getting one piece of a puzzle somewhere and then you have to solve that puzzle yourself.

(1) Some people seem to use Ivermectin as a political tool to point out that anti-vaxxers are taking "horse paste."
(2) Ivermectin has different doses for humans and horses. Human dose is safe for humans. Horse dose is NOT.
(3) Ivermectin is a generic drug meaning Big Pharma can't do price gouging with it.
(4) Pharmacies have been told not to sell Ivermectin (that's why some people get horse version instead!)
(5) Almost half of FDA's funding comes from the companies it regulates (insane!).
(6) The effectiveness of Ivermectin (for humans) to battle Covid-19 is not clear.
(7) Monoclonal antibodies seems to be the best* Covid-19 treatment (but only rich people have access to it).
(9) Some people use Ivermectin as a scam to cash in (consultation fee).

It has taken so long to get a better picture of the dewormer issue! It is dangerous to jump to conclusions too early, because you never know what kind of agenda people have. It is as if everyone is after money these days and nobody is interested about the truth. Ivermectin seems to be an issue so versatile, that any group of people can look at it from a particular angle and use it cynically to advance their agenda  :-X If I am wrong with any of the points listed above please educate me.

* After getting fully vaccinated, which is a no-brainer at this point given the data of how well the vaccines work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 20, 2021, 03:37:42 AM
Some encouraging news:  https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/20/health/pfizer-child-vaccine-data/index.html

"Covid-19 vaccine for 5- to 11-year-olds is safe and shows 'robust' antibody response, Pfizer says"

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 20, 2021, 11:51:02 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 20, 2021, 03:20:21 AM
The can of dewormers

I was one who a while ago laughed at people taking "horse dewormers", but now my attitude has changed after hearing more information and having a more nyanced picture. I am surprised how badly Ivermectin has been dealt with in the media. I haven't seen anyone give the "whole picture" of it. It is like getting one piece of a puzzle somewhere and then you have to solve that puzzle yourself.

(1) Some people seem to use Ivermectin as a political tool to point out that anti-vaxxers are taking "horse paste."
(2) Ivermectin has different doses for humans and horses. Human dose is safe for humans. Horse dose is NOT.
(3) Ivermectin is a generic drug meaning Big Pharma can't do price gouging with it.
(4) Pharmacies have been told not to sell Ivermectin (that's why some people get horse version instead!)
(5) Almost half of FDA's funding comes from the companies it regulates (insane!).
(6) The effectiveness of Ivermectin (for humans) to battle Covid-19 is not clear.
(7) Monoclonal antibodies seems to be the best* Covid-19 treatment (but only rich people have access to it).
(9) Some people use Ivermectin as a scam to cash in (consultation fee).

It has taken so long to get a better picture of the dewormer issue! It is dangerous to jump to conclusions too early, because you never know what kind of agenda people have. It is as if everyone is after money these days and nobody is interested about the truth. Ivermectin seems to be an issue so versatile, that any group of people can look at it from a particular angle and use it cynically to advance their agenda  :-X If I am wrong with any of the points listed above please educate me.

* After getting fully vaccinated, which is a no-brainer at this point given the data of how well the vaccines work.
That's good that you did your own research instead of relying on whatever the mainstream narrative is.

Nuance doesn't sell, after all. Emotion does. What you wrote wouldn't make money. But "look at these dumb anti-vaxxers taking horse dewormer, let's point and laugh!" does sell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 20, 2021, 12:39:55 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 20, 2021, 03:37:42 AM
Some encouraging news:  https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/20/health/pfizer-child-vaccine-data/index.html

"Covid-19 vaccine for 5- to 11-year-olds is safe and shows 'robust' antibody response, Pfizer says"

PD

I'm not surprised. As has been seen in other virus outbreaks over the last century, the response of young children has always been the strongest and apparently a key to longer term immunity for the whole community. There is a small body of research on this subject and maybe it needs to be looked at in more depth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 20, 2021, 03:00:11 PM
Quote from: greg on September 20, 2021, 11:51:02 AM
That's good that you did your own research instead of relying on whatever the mainstream narrative is.

Nuance doesn't sell, after all. Emotion does. What you wrote wouldn't make money. But "look at these dumb anti-vaxxers taking horse dewormer, let's point and laugh!" does sell.

Maybe not researched, but after following the Ivermectin debate for a few weeks some knowledge has accumulated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 20, 2021, 05:12:39 PM
ffs...how about you take some and tell us how it works out?

You wont want to read something in contract to following YT infotainment, but here is a succinct overview of the current research into Ivermectin (I'm going to quote the article in full, but if you follow the link you see the text has hyperlinks leading you to all the cited studies and tests):

Ivermectin — whether formulated for humans or horses — is not a treatment for COVID-19 (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/covid-19-ivermectin-treat-prevent-risks-fda-regulate-use-vaccine-2184811)

"Hydroxychloroquine. Remdesivir. Ivermectin. Several medications have been touted as miracle drugs for COVID-19 throughout the pandemic, often without solid medical evidence supporting their use. Almost like fad diets, arguments for these controversial treatments have come and gone, with ivermectin most recently taking the stage.

As a physician and COVID-19 genetics researcher, I am concerned. No substance we consume, whether one of these medications or a nutritional supplement, lacks risk. Self-medicating in an uncontrolled setting without consultation with medical professionals endangers people, especially when evidence suggests these medications do not help prevent or treat COVID-19.

Ivermectin is used to treat several types of parasitic infections. It works by interfering with a parasite's nervous system to paralyze and ultimately kill it.

The research
Ivermectin has been getting recent attention as test-tube studies have demonstrated that it can prevent the virus from continuing to grow. This has motivated clinical trials to determine if these results could apply in humans as well.

While such results are promising, experiments in a test tube are a lot different from clinical trials, given that you can test drug dosages that would be unsafe or unattainable in humans to determine if an effect exists. Such phenomena are why we so often hear about experiments claiming new cancer cures with less progress in the treatment of our friends and family.

What does the data show about ivermectin for treating COVID-19 in people? There are some promising findings in critically ill patients, but more high-quality data needs to be collected, particularly for those with mild or silent COVID. That's currently in progress.

The risks
The high-quality aspect of the research is crucial because ivermectin is not without its risks. While ivermectin is generally well tolerated and safe at dosages recommended by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), around three per cent of people can experience itchy skin, general itchiness or dizziness. At these doses, individuals can, in rare circumstances, have seizures or a life-threatening immune reaction. If one takes the blood thinner warfarin (Coumadin), ivermectin can interact with this medication and increase the risk of bleeding.

It is important to consult licensed health-care providers about medications and their potential harms because an increased risk of bleeding can, in extreme cases, translate into bleeding in the brain, which can be life-threatening. Your family doctor or nurse practitioner has the training required to determine if a medication is appropriate and, if so, whether they should decrease your dose to keep you safe.

Such a safety profile means that if ivermectin ultimately does prove to help treat COVID-19, your doctor could prescribe it, when appropriate, with a reasonable amount of confidence that its benefits will outweigh its potential harms. It is generally not being prescribed for COVID-19 outside of clinical trials now because evidence of it helping people is not yet there.

Good intentions, but unsafe choices

Recently, non-medical individuals have been taking this data inappropriately into their own hands and have self-prescribed and self-medicated with veterinary ivermectin, guided by social media personalities and politicians. These well-intentioned victims have been overdosing themselves with the medication and have been increasingly appearing in emergency departments.

This behaviour is dangerous because all medications (and nutritional supplements) have a higher risk of side-effects as you increase the dosage. The risk of seizure and life-threatening immune reactions are low at FDA-approved dosages of ivermectin. The chance is much higher when you significantly increase the dose, which is what would happen if you took amounts intended for mammals larger than you. It is not safe — a sentiment echoed by the FDA.

The benefit of the doubt
COVID-19 is terrifying and has left many feeling powerless over a deadly infection. Vaccination is the best treatment for COVID-19 because it prevents you from getting the disease altogether in most cases. For those who still contract the disease, most will have only a mild infection and not die.

Many people question this safe and effective treatment based on the false and exaggerated claims by anti-vaccination activists and some politicians. It is hardly surprising and entirely understandable that our neighbours would seek to take their safety and lives into their own hands if they felt it was the best option.

I am here to recommend that we all take a step back and reflect on how the pandemic has changed us. Reflect on the fear, vulnerability and frustration we have been cycling through these past 18 months. Today, please give health-care providers a chance and trust us. Wear your mask, get vaccinated if you have not already. Give us, your neighbours, the benefit of the doubt. We want to help you. Would you please help us?"


also:

US horse owners face ivermectin shortage as humans chase unproven Covid 'cure' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/20/ivermectin-shortage-horse-owners-covid)

...as happened for patients with a legitimate need for hydrochloriquine
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 20, 2021, 05:46:58 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 20, 2021, 03:00:11 PM
Maybe not researched, but after following the Ivermectin debate for a few weeks some knowledge has accumulated.

Something which I doubt Greg has an answer for: and what reputable medical source is advising Ivermectin as treatment for or preventative of COVID-19?

So, yeah, I'm laughing my arse off at MAGA-zoids who are taking it because "they heard somewhere."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 20, 2021, 11:11:59 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 20, 2021, 05:12:39 PM

The benefit of the doubt
COVID-19 is terrifying and has left many feeling powerless over a deadly infection. Vaccination is the best treatment for COVID-19 because it prevents you from getting the disease altogether in most cases. For those who still contract the disease, most will have only a mild infection and not die.

Many people question this safe and effective treatment based on the false and exaggerated claims by anti-vaccination activists and some politicians. It is hardly surprising and entirely understandable that our neighbours would seek to take their safety and lives into their own hands if they felt it was the best option.

I am here to recommend that we all take a step back and reflect on how the pandemic has changed us. Reflect on the fear, vulnerability and frustration we have been cycling through these past 18 months. Today, please give health-care providers a chance and trust us. Wear your mask, get vaccinated if you have not already. Give us, your neighbours, the benefit of the doubt. We want to help you. Would you please help us?"

Salient and sage advice. It's not rocket science and the proof that the vaccines do protect us is abundant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 21, 2021, 03:15:55 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 20, 2021, 05:46:58 PM
Something which I doubt Greg has an answer for: and what reputable medical source is advising Ivermectin as treatment for or preventative of COVID-19?

So, yeah, I'm laughing my arse off at MAGA-zoids who are taking it because "they heard somewhere."

Yeah, it is interesting to believe 99 % of doctors in the World are part of a global conspiracy to magnetize/microship people with vaccines, but Ivermectin is great, because Joe Rogan and Alex Jones said so! ???

At the moment I am pretty neutral about Ivermectin (human doses of it). It may not harm much to take, but it probably doesn't help much either. It would be bad for Big Pharma, if it turned out Ivermectin worked well against Covid-19, because it is a cheap generic drug. Big Pharma needs "Pzifermectin" that sells $400 per dose to cash in. Ivermectin is a problem because some people take horse doses and/or think Ivermectin can keep them safe without getting vaccinated. Joe Rogan got better fast, but he "threw the kitchen sink at it." He had a cocktail of drugs! A cocktail not available for normal people. Many people say it was mostly the monoclonal antibodies that cured him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 21, 2021, 03:33:40 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 20, 2021, 05:12:39 PM
also:

US horse owners face ivermectin shortage as humans chase unproven Covid 'cure' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/20/ivermectin-shortage-horse-owners-covid)

...as happened for patients with a legitimate need for hydrochloriquine

Why don't they give the vaccines refused by Covidiots to the horses?  ;D If dewormers work against Covid, maybe Covid vaccines can be used to deworm horses?  ;D That's sound MAGA logic, isn't it? The only downsize would be magnetized horses. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 21, 2021, 04:10:06 AM
Still a good development here in DK, with a positive percentage below 1% in tests, typically 250 - 500 cases per day, and a fall in the number of hospitalizations, from about 140 to now 96, within a few weeks, and in spite of the general opening up. Today's calculated R number is again 0.7

Experts find it puzzling, and are ascribing it to the vaccination rate, but they still warn for a later 4th and 5th wave.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 21, 2021, 06:00:59 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 21, 2021, 04:10:06 AM
Still a good development here in DK, with a positive percentage below 1% in tests, typically 250 - 500 cases per day, and a fall in the number of hospitalizations, from about 140 to now 96, within a few weeks, and in spite of the general opening up. Today's calculated R number is again 0.7

Experts find it puzzling, and are ascribing it to the vaccination rate, but they still warn for a later 4th and 5th wave.

Good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 06:21:27 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 20, 2021, 03:20:21 AM
The can of dewormers

I was one who a while ago laughed at people taking "horse dewormers", but now my attitude has changed after hearing more information and having a more nyanced picture. I am surprised how badly Ivermectin has been dealt with in the media. I haven't seen anyone give the "whole picture" of it. It is like getting one piece of a puzzle somewhere and then you have to solve that puzzle yourself.

(1) Some people seem to use Ivermectin as a political tool to point out that anti-vaxxers are taking "horse paste."

Some of them are.

(2) Ivermectin has different doses for humans and horses. Human dose is safe for humans. Horse dose is NOT.

Ivermectin carries risk even when used according to prescription guidelines. That is why it is not available over the counter.

(3) Ivermectin is a generic drug meaning Big Pharma can't do price gouging with it.

It is possible to manipulate the price of off-patent medication. That was the basis of "Pharma-bro" scheme. Ivermectin is likely to get very expensive because there is limit supply and a sudden increase in demand. People who actually need it won't be able to get it.

(4) Pharmacies have been told not to sell Ivermectin (that's why some people get horse version instead!)

Invermectin is a prescription drug, meaning you can't get it without a doctor's order. Pharmacies will sell or not sell ivermectin depending on whether a valid prescription is presented.

(5) Almost half of FDA's funding comes from the companies it regulates (insane!).

The funding you refer to consists of user fees. If you request a driver's license you pay a fee, if you request a passport you pay a processing fee, if you apply for a VISA you pay a fee, if you file a patent application you pay a fee. Fees are ubiquitous when government services are involved. The FDA fees are meant to defray the significant costs the FDA incurs to evaluate a drug, and I assume a side effect of this is to discourage frivolous applications.

(6) The effectiveness of Ivermectin (for humans) to battle Covid-19 is not clear.

Not clear meaning there is no significant evidence? What is clear is that in some cell cultures Invermectin inhibits viral replication (at concentration corresponding to 100 times a fatal dose). There are a few clinical studies which seem to show a benefit, but the studies are small and the results not statistically significant. There is a hint that Invermectin may someday be the basis of an anti-viral therapy.

(7) Monoclonal antibodies seems to be the best* Covid-19 treatment (but only rich people have access to it).

Monoclonal antibody infusions were purchased by the federal government and are offered free of cost, although there may be a fee to administer the treatment, which may be covered by health insurance. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/monoclonal-antibody-treatment-for-covid-19-effectiveness-cost-and-more

(9) Some people use Ivermectin as a scam to cash in (consultation fee).

QuoteIt has taken so long to get a better picture of the dewormer issue! It is dangerous to jump to conclusions too early, because you never know what kind of agenda people have. It is as if everyone is after money these days and nobody is interested about the truth. Ivermectin seems to be an issue so versatile, that any group of people can look at it from a particular angle and use it cynically to advance their agenda  :-X If I am wrong with any of the points listed above please educate me.

If you want to do "research" you should simply read the FDA guidance on Ivermectin.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 21, 2021, 07:29:07 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 20, 2021, 05:46:58 PM
Something which I doubt Greg has an answer for: and what reputable medical source is advising Ivermectin as treatment for or preventative of COVID-19?

So, yeah, I'm laughing my arse off at MAGA-zoids who are taking it because "they heard somewhere."
I don't get the point of the question. I don't know anything about that medicine nor do I care to research it, also I don't have an opinion on whether to support it or not. Just wanted to say that it's good he went out of his way to learn about something rather than just accept what is being blasted at the general public. After all, if none of us did our own investigations, we'd only be listening to pop/country/rap, never to classical music.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 21, 2021, 08:24:40 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 06:21:27 AM
(1) Some people seem to use Ivermectin as a political tool to point out that anti-vaxxers are taking "horse paste."

Some of them are.

(2) Ivermectin has different doses for humans and horses. Human dose is safe for humans. Horse dose is NOT.

Ivermectin carries risk even when used according to prescription guidelines. That is why it is not available over the counter.

(3) Ivermectin is a generic drug meaning Big Pharma can't do price gouging with it.

It is possible to manipulate the price of off-patent medication. That was the basis of "Pharma-bro" scheme. Ivermectin is likely to get very expensive because there is limit supply and a sudden increase in demand. People who actually need it won't be able to get it.

(4) Pharmacies have been told not to sell Ivermectin (that's why some people get horse version instead!)

Invermectin is a prescription drug, meaning you can't get it without a doctor's order. Pharmacies will sell or not sell ivermectin depending on whether a valid prescription is presented.

(5) Almost half of FDA's funding comes from the companies it regulates (insane!).

The funding you refer to consists of user fees. If you request a driver's license you pay a fee, if you request a passport you pay a processing fee, if you apply for a VISA you pay a fee, if you file a patent application you pay a fee. Fees are ubiquitous when government services are involved. The FDA fees are meant to defray the significant costs the FDA incurs to evaluate a drug, and I assume a side effect of this is to discourage frivolous applications.

(6) The effectiveness of Ivermectin (for humans) to battle Covid-19 is not clear.

Not clear meaning there is no significant evidence? What is clear is that in some cell cultures Invermectin inhibits viral replication (at concentration corresponding to 100 times a fatal dose). There are a few clinical studies which seem to show a benefit, but the studies are small and the results not statistically significant. There is a hint that Invermectin may someday be the basis of an anti-viral therapy.

(7) Monoclonal antibodies seems to be the best* Covid-19 treatment (but only rich people have access to it).

Monoclonal antibody infusions were purchased by the federal government and are offered free of cost, although there may be a fee to administer the treatment, which may be covered by health insurance. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/monoclonal-antibody-treatment-for-covid-19-effectiveness-cost-and-more

(9) Some people use Ivermectin as a scam to cash in (consultation fee).

If you want to do "research" you should simply read the FDA guidance on Ivermectin.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

Thanks for these points! FDA guidance is of course good, but reading it does not explain why Alex Jones pushes dewormers like there was no tomorrow. I'm not only interested of Ivermectin as a drug. I am interested as to why people have so different views of these things. Are we soon at a point where people debate about whether the sky is blue? Will the society come to a total halt at that point? Does the humanity have any future? Will the climate change kill us off this planet within the next 100 years and that's it? Was Covid-19 pandemic a taste of the apocalyptic times ahead of us?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 08:34:58 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 21, 2021, 08:24:40 AM
Thanks for these points! FDA guidance is of course good, but reading it does not explain why Alex Jones pushes dewormers like there was no tomorrow. I'm not only interested of Ivermectin as a drug. I am interested as to why people have so different views of these things. Are we soon at a point where people debate about whether the sky is blue? Will the society come to a total halt at that point? Does the humanity have any future? Will the climate change kill us off this planet within the next 100 years and that's it? Was Covid-19 pandemic a taste of the apocalyptic times ahead of us?

Alex Jones is mentally ill and one of the more despicable human beings you will ever encounter. He also pushed the theory that the Sandy Hook shooting was a 'false flag' attack and staged by 'crisis actors.' His followers cruelly harassed parents who lost children in the attack. Whether he believes the idiotic conspiracy theories he pushes is questionable, that he profits from them is not. (BTW, I have family members that live in Sandy Hook and Newtown, who knew one of the first-graders that was murdered at Sandy Hook elementary school).

The defining characteristic of the modern conspiracy theorist is that the most insignificant inconsistency in the official story is taken as absolute proof that the official story is false (and often the inconsistency arrises from the conspiracy theorist's inability to understand the official story) while glaring inconsistencies in the conspiracy are ignored.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 09:13:12 AM
"Texas couple asked to leave restaurant for wearing face masks to protect their immunocompromised infant"

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/21/us/no-mask-policy-restaurant-couple-texas-trnd/index.html

God help us!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 21, 2021, 10:26:52 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 09:13:12 AM
"Texas couple asked to leave restaurant for wearing face masks to protect their immunocompromised infant"

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/21/us/no-mask-policy-restaurant-couple-texas-trnd/index.html

God help us!

PD

Texas is deep in the Death Cult Belt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 21, 2021, 11:28:43 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 08:34:58 AM
Alex Jones is mentally ill and one of the more despicable human beings you will ever encounter. He also pushed the theory that the Sandy Hook shooting was a 'false flag' attack and staged by 'crisis actors.' His followers cruelly harassed parents who lost children in the attack. Whether he believes the idiotic conspiracy theories he pushes is questionable, that he profits from them is not. (BTW, I have family members that live in Sandy Hook and Newtown, who knew one of the first-graders that was murdered at Sandy Hook elementary school).

The defining characteristic of the modern conspiracy theorist is that the most insignificant inconsistency in the official story is taken as absolute proof that the official story is false (and often the inconsistency arrises from the conspiracy theorist's inability to understand the official story) while glaring inconsistencies in the conspiracy are ignored.
Maybe you didn't see him on Joe Rogan. He went on and on about how he was wrong and changed his mind on that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 21, 2021, 11:42:28 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 08:34:58 AM
Alex Jones is mentally ill and one of the more despicable human beings you will ever encounter. He also pushed the theory that the Sandy Hook shooting was a 'false flag' attack and staged by 'crisis actors.' His followers cruelly harassed parents who lost children in the attack. Whether he believes the idiotic conspiracy theories he pushes is questionable, that he profits from them is not. (BTW, I have family members that live in Sandy Hook and Newtown, who knew one of the first-graders that was murdered at Sandy Hook elementary school).

The defining characteristic of the modern conspiracy theorist is that the most insignificant inconsistency in the official story is taken as absolute proof that the official story is false (and often the inconsistency arises from the conspiracy theorist's inability to understand the official story) while glaring inconsistencies in the conspiracy are ignored.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 21, 2021, 12:06:25 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 09:13:12 AM
"Texas couple asked to leave restaurant for wearing face masks to protect their immunocompromised infant"

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/21/us/no-mask-policy-restaurant-couple-texas-trnd/index.html

God help us!

PD

Yes, God help us understand why just a single incident like this becomes news. It's simply a single incident and not necessarily indicative of any proveable trend but would the media have us think otherwise?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on September 21, 2021, 12:06:56 PM
Quote from: greg on September 21, 2021, 11:28:43 AM
Maybe you didn't see him on Joe Rogan. He went on and on about how he was wrong and changed his mind on that.

Being sued will often do that.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-lawsuit-alex-jones-idUSKBN1YZ1BB
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 12:13:34 PM
Quote from: greg on September 21, 2021, 11:28:43 AM
Maybe you didn't see him on Joe Rogan. He went on and on about how he was wrong and changed his mind on that.

And you think that has nothing to do with the ongoing lawsuits and the impending imposition of compensatory and punitive damages for his lies about the Sandy Hook incident?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 12:35:49 PM
Quote from: Holden on September 21, 2021, 12:06:25 PM
Yes, God help us understand why just a single incident like this becomes news. It's simply a single incident and not necessarily indicative of any proveable trend but would the media have us think otherwise?
Pardon, but did you read the article?  And, yes, they were shocked as they had never been told this before in Texas (so hopefully, no more places are doing this or maybe just not in their area?  Or perhaps people just avoid places where there's either an official rule or an unofficial one that you can't wear a mask...or no one else there will?  But again, they can seldom go out due to circumstances.).  Or maybe they just haven't been reported?  I don't know.  Yes, I understand that it's a privately owned business, but to tell someone that has just told you that they are trying their best to protect their infant who has cystic fibrosis and tell them that they must leave....not even trying to talk to her boss.  Again, if you read the article, it wasn't posted any where about the no mask policy, and they could barely hear her when they entered the establishment and thinking that she (the hostess) just wanted them to remove their masks in order to confirm their ID.  And they were kind enough despite all of that to pay their tab (despite not having received the food that they had ordered).  And now they are even more reluctant to go out...despite being a young couple struggling to get out a couple of times a month and having an infant with serious health issues.

And hopefully it's not a trend.  Fair to them for calling out the establishment and letting people know what the rules are and decide for yourself whether or not you want to spend your money there.  Hopefully, the owner will rethink some things and be willing to be more compassionate and flexible.

Just my thoughts.

Best wishes,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 21, 2021, 01:41:21 PM
Quote from: JBS on September 21, 2021, 12:06:56 PM
Being sued will often do that.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-lawsuit-alex-jones-idUSKBN1YZ1BB

It did me good to read that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 21, 2021, 01:52:18 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 12:35:49 PM
And hopefully it's not a trend. 

It is unfortunately.  I've seen restaurants and other private businesses pop up in the news repeatedly for having anti-mask rules.  Some have anti-vax rules.  This is though the first time I've heard about people being kicked out.  It is usually just a note on the door of the business.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 21, 2021, 02:59:15 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 21, 2021, 12:13:34 PM
And you think that has nothing to do with the ongoing lawsuits and the impending imposition of compensatory and punitive damages for his lies about the Sandy Hook incident?
It could. I'm not familiar with the rules about what would happen after you pay the 100k, and then later continued saying the same thing again. Also wondering how the parents were negatively affected to merit that much money.

Also curious to hear what mental illness he was diagnosed with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 03:01:45 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 21, 2021, 01:52:18 PM
It is unfortunately.  I've seen restaurants and other private businesses pop up in the news repeatedly for having anti-mask rules.  Some have anti-vax rules.  This is though the first time I've heard about people being kicked out.  It is usually just a note on the door of the business.
Anti-vax rules?!   :( What is up there?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 21, 2021, 03:03:46 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 21, 2021, 01:52:18 PM
It is unfortunately.  I've seen restaurants and other private businesses pop up in the news repeatedly for having anti-mask rules.  Some have anti-vax rules.  This is though the first time I've heard about people being kicked out.  It is usually just a note on the door of the business.
If I saw a note that masks aren't allowed, I wouldn't eat there. And they'd lose my business. So would be a dumb move on their part.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:02:35 PM
Quote from: greg on September 21, 2021, 02:59:15 PM
It could. I'm not familiar with the rules about what would happen after you pay the 100k, and then later continued saying the same thing again. Also wondering how the parents were negatively affected to merit that much money.

Also curious to hear what mental illness he was diagnosed with.

Self-diagnosis, March 2019:

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blames 'psychosis' for his Sandy Hook claims (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/30/alex-jones-sandy-hook-claims-psychosis)

"The conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blamed various claims he has made, including that the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting was a hoax, on "psychosis", according to a deposition given by the Infowars host as part of a Texas lawsuit.

Jones described his conspiracy thinking as a kind of mental disorder in the deposition, which was taken earlier this month for the lawsuit filed against him by the family of a six-year-old who was among 20 children and six adults killed in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, the Austin American-Statesman reported.

Jones said he "almost had like a form of psychosis back in the past where I basically thought everything was staged, even though I'm now learning a lot of times things aren't staged". [slow clap emoji goes here]

Jones blamed his mental state on "the trauma of the media and the corporations lying so much, then everything begins – you don't trust anything anymore, kind of like a child whose parents lie to them over and over again, well, pretty soon they don't know what reality is".

The defamation suit was filed in Travis county, Texas, where Jones' media company is based. In August, the judge presiding denied Jones' request to dismiss the case.

Jones' attorneys have defended his speech in court as "rhetorical hyperbole", but denied it was defamation. In the deposition, Jones continued to voice conspiratorial suspicions about the Sandy Hook shooting.

"I still think that there was a man in the woods in camo ... and just a lot of experts I've talked to, including retired FBI agents and other people and people high up in the Central Intelligence Agency, have told me that there is a cover-up in Sandy Hook," Jones said.

A similar lawsuit has been filed in Connecticut. Several families in that suit say Jones' comments have tormented them and subjected them to harassment and death threats by his followers, some of whom have accused them of being actors.

On Friday, a federal judge in West Virginia allowed another defamation case against Jones to proceed. The suit was filed on behalf of Brennan Gilmore, who captured footage of a fatal car attack on counterprotesters during a far-right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017.

In a statement, Andrew Mendrala, supervising attorney with the Civil Rights Clinic at Georgetown Law, said: "Victims of vile conspiracy theories should take comfort ... today's decision shows that the law will protect victims of baseless lies by holding people like Alex Jones accountable for the harm they cause."

Quote from: greg on September 21, 2021, 11:28:43 AM
Maybe you didn't see him on Joe Rogan. He went on and on about how he was wrong and changed his mind on that.

Did he beg the forgiveness of the parents he cruelly insulted and put at risk? Did he ask his followers to also beg their forgiveness and admit the error of their ways? Will he dedicate the rest of his life to being a cautionary tale of the dangers of misinformation, conspiracy and threat? (No, I'm not going to go listen to Joe fucking Rogan to find out).

Because this isn't the kind of thing that a simple yers-later "my bad" excuses.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 21, 2021, 05:34:46 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:02:35 PM
Self-diagnosis, March 2019:

Jones blamed his mental state on "the trauma of the media and the corporations lying so much, then everything begins – you don't trust anything anymore, kind of like a child whose parents lie to them over and over again, well, pretty soon they don't know what reality is".
Sounds more like his excuse for being reckless. The media and corporations are liars, and you shouldn't automatically trust what they say, but to say that you are getting psychosis from it is nonsense, just an excuse.




Quote from: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:02:35 PM
A similar lawsuit has been filed in Connecticut. Several families in that suit say Jones' comments have tormented them and subjected them to harassment and death threats by his followers, some of whom have accused them of being actors.
That brings an interesting question of where to draw the line. Like how much are you responsible for what your audience does? I guess it would depend on what he said specifically, alone saying that they are crisis actors shouldn't really be enough, but telling your audience to hunt them down would be without a doubt a serious offense. This reminds me of youtube channels where they parody/"roast" other youtubers, but people in their audience find the person being roasted and try to doxx them, or cause mischief, even though that was not their intent at all (eventually leading them to have to put disclaimers telling people to NOT go after them). Those channels end up getting banned. The nutjobs ruin it for everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:54:02 PM
You're forgetting that that's not how stochastic terrorism works. You don't have to plan a specific event for a specific day, you just have to whip up your followers with fear, anger and outrage to such a fever pitch that its certain that something will happen, and it doesn't matter where or when so long as they identify the "correct" enemies - while the inciter maintains a plausible deniability.. (see: Trump, Donald)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 22, 2021, 04:11:27 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 21, 2021, 03:01:45 PM
Anti-vax rules?!   :( What is up there?

PD

Restaurant owners putting up signs saying that the vaccinated are unwelcome and a health risk to their loyal customers due to the danger of "infection" by the vaccine.  Sadly I'm not joking.  Others just say that they are unwelcome because the vaccinated are un-American or un-patriotic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 22, 2021, 04:14:13 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 22, 2021, 04:11:27 AM
Restaurant owners putting up signs saying that the vaccinated are unwelcome and a health risk to their loyal customers due to the danger of "infection" by the vaccine.  Sadly I'm not joking.  Others just say that they are unwelcome because the vaccinated are un-American or un-patriotic.
:(  :'(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 22, 2021, 04:42:51 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:02:35 PM
Self-diagnosis, March 2019:

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blames 'psychosis' for his Sandy Hook claims (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/30/alex-jones-sandy-hook-claims-psychosis)

"The conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blamed various claims he has made, including that the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting was a hoax, on "psychosis", according to a deposition given by the Infowars host as part of a Texas lawsuit.

Jones described his conspiracy thinking as a kind of mental disorder in the deposition, which was taken earlier this month for the lawsuit filed against him by the family of a six-year-old who was among 20 children and six adults killed in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, the Austin American-Statesman reported.

Jones said he "almost had like a form of psychosis back in the past where I basically thought everything was staged, even though I'm now learning a lot of times things aren't staged". [slow clap emoji goes here]

Jones blamed his mental state on "the trauma of the media and the corporations lying so much, then everything begins – you don't trust anything anymore, kind of like a child whose parents lie to them over and over again, well, pretty soon they don't know what reality is".

The defamation suit was filed in Travis county, Texas, where Jones' media company is based. In August, the judge presiding denied Jones' request to dismiss the case.

Jones' attorneys have defended his speech in court as "rhetorical hyperbole", but denied it was defamation. In the deposition, Jones continued to voice conspiratorial suspicions about the Sandy Hook shooting.

"I still think that there was a man in the woods in camo ... and just a lot of experts I've talked to, including retired FBI agents and other people and people high up in the Central Intelligence Agency, have told me that there is a cover-up in Sandy Hook," Jones said.

A similar lawsuit has been filed in Connecticut. Several families in that suit say Jones' comments have tormented them and subjected them to harassment and death threats by his followers, some of whom have accused them of being actors.

On Friday, a federal judge in West Virginia allowed another defamation case against Jones to proceed. The suit was filed on behalf of Brennan Gilmore, who captured footage of a fatal car attack on counterprotesters during a far-right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017.

In a statement, Andrew Mendrala, supervising attorney with the Civil Rights Clinic at Georgetown Law, said: "Victims of vile conspiracy theories should take comfort ... today's decision shows that the law will protect victims of baseless lies by holding people like Alex Jones accountable for the harm they cause."

Did he beg the forgiveness of the parents he cruelly insulted and put at risk? Did he ask his followers to also beg their forgiveness and admit the error of their ways? Will he dedicate the rest of his life to being a cautionary tale of the dangers of misinformation, conspiracy and threat? (No, I'm not going to go listen to Joe fucking Rogan to find out).

Because this isn't the kind of thing that a simple yers-later "my bad" excuses.




"I was the party who was really traumatized" doesn't pass the sniff test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 22, 2021, 04:45:26 AM
Some of these lines will be wearisomely familiar:

"Experts say trumpeting ivermectin risks discouraging people from getting vaccinated; instead they just take an unproven drug when they get very sick with COVID-19. But Lorigo has built a potentially lucrative brand as the go-to guy for desperate people willing to buck science in the pandemic's fourth wave.

Not that he sees it that way. In fact, Lorigo argues—without evidence—that doctors, hospitals, and "Big Pharma" are the ones turning people away from ivermectin in chase of their own profits.

Ralph Lorigo has built a potentially lucrative brand as the go-to guy for desperate people willing to buck science in the pandemic's fourth wave. Now doctors are speaking out. (https://www.thedailybeast.com/lawyer-ralph-lorigo-forces-ivermectin-on-hospitals-as-covid-treatment-and-drives-doctors-crazy?via=newsletter&source=DDMorning)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 22, 2021, 03:53:01 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 21, 2021, 05:54:02 PM
You're forgetting that that's not how stochastic terrorism works. You don't have to plan a specific event for a specific day, you just have to whip up your followers with fear, anger and outrage to such a fever pitch that its certain that something will happen, and it doesn't matter where or when so long as they identify the "correct" enemies - while the inciter maintains a plausible deniability.. (see: Trump, Donald)
Oh, that media buzzword.
So mainstream media such as CNN doesn't do this at all, right?

Ultimately people are responsible for their own actions. People can say whatever they want, if people are dumb enough to act on it then that's their fault. Obvious incitement to violence is currently the line (I think legally IIRC), but if you take "stochastic terrorism" seriously then you are moving the line closer and closer to authoritarianism and censorship/restriction of speech, and we all know how much happiness that provides people around the world. And the problem with that is you never know exactly where the line is. So some offhand comment that you have made in the past that wasn't intended to do any harm is taken out of context years later and then imagine getting into legal trouble for it.

That is the way China runs- last story I heard was about a fashion model who had photos from years ago wearing the WWII Japanese flag as a shirt, and the CCP recently found it and deleted everything from the internet and ended her career. And an actor who took some vacation photo in front of some historical monument or shrine, not knowing the significance or meaning of it, and same happened to him. Sounds like a psychologically fun system to live under.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on September 22, 2021, 04:41:18 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 22, 2021, 04:11:27 AM
Restaurant owners putting up signs saying that the vaccinated are unwelcome and a health risk to their loyal customers due to the danger of "infection" by the vaccine.  Sadly I'm not joking.  Others just say that they are unwelcome because the vaccinated are un-American or un-patriotic.

WOW!  ???

What an incredibly strange and demented world we live in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on September 22, 2021, 04:50:29 PM
Being particularly at risk I am going to get my third Pfizer jab in four days. However, since all corona restrictions have been abandoned in my country, I still have to be very careful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 22, 2021, 04:57:48 PM
Quote from: DavidW on September 22, 2021, 04:11:27 AM
Restaurant owners putting up signs saying that the vaccinated are unwelcome and a health risk to their loyal customers due to the danger of "infection" by the vaccine.  Sadly I'm not joking.  Others just say that they are unwelcome because the vaccinated are un-American or un-patriotic.

David, both of us know that they don't inject you with any form of Covid but this is not actually wide spread knowledge which is a pity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 22, 2021, 07:57:53 PM
Quote from: greg on September 22, 2021, 03:53:01 PM
Oh, that media buzzword.
So mainstream media such as CNN doesn't do this at all, right?


There is nothing in any way resembling the paranoid conspiracy fever dreams of an Alex Jones on CNN or similar. Suggesting there is is utter ridiculous. Instead of taking some youtubers word for it turn it on right now and see for yourself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 22, 2021, 08:13:54 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on September 22, 2021, 04:50:29 PM
Being particularly at risk I am going to get my third Pfizer jab in four days. However, since all corona restrictions have been abandoned in my country, I still have to be very careful.

I rely on you to exercise caution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 22, 2021, 08:15:32 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 22, 2021, 07:57:53 PM
There is nothing in any way resembling the paranoid conspiracy fever dreams of an Alex Jones on CNN or similar. Suggesting there is is utter ridiculous. Instead of taking some youtubers word for it turn it on right now and see for yourself.

Ah, utterly ridiculous suggestions: I see you've met our greg.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 23, 2021, 07:19:55 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 22, 2021, 07:57:53 PM
There is nothing in any way resembling the paranoid conspiracy fever dreams of an Alex Jones on CNN or similar. Suggesting there is is utter ridiculous. Instead of taking some youtubers word for it turn it on right now and see for yourself.
No, I'm not talking about conspiracies, I'm talking about narratives in reference to the stochastic terrorism you are talking about. They are both doing the same thing- selling stories/narratives. These narratives can end up in real world damage.

Last year, for example. Who do you think is responsible for the narrative that the cops are all out to get minorities? George Floyd was not a common occurrence, and they didn't even show the first video to give context to the whole story. So people get mad and cause riots and people even died. Imagine if it had not been on mainstream news, what the difference would have been. They didn't even have the full videos yet their narrative was set and before they were released harm was done. Sounds like stochastic terrorism to me.


Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 22, 2021, 08:15:32 PM
Ah, utterly ridiculous suggestions: I see you've met our greg.
You can sit there and pretend you don't understand what I'm talking about, that's fine I guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 07:28:56 AM
Quote from: greg on September 23, 2021, 07:19:55 AM
George Floyd was not a common occurrence,

It was a common occurrence. Mistreatment of blacks and racism is commonplace among police, unfortunately. Before the age of smartphones police got away by saying ALL blacks are lying. Nowadays it is more difficult.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 23, 2021, 07:36:20 AM
Quote from: greg on September 23, 2021, 07:19:55 AMLast year, for example. Who do you think is responsible for the narrative that the cops are all out to get minorities? George Floyd was not a common occurrence, and they didn't even show the first video to give context to the whole story. So people get mad and cause riots and people even died. Imagine if it had not been on mainstream news, what the difference would have been. They didn't even have the full videos yet their narrative was set and before they were released harm was done. Sounds like stochastic terrorism to me.

This is an absurd comparison. CNN and other news network produced stories reporting the fact that a man was murdered in the street, the people at the scene, including a fireman, call 911 to report a police murder in progress. The cop was eventually convicted of murder.  If any deadly violence was incited (and there was relatively little) it was incited by the true circumstances of the case. Alex Jones reported that the Sandy Hook shooting was staged by the government to support a liberal political agenda, that the children supposedly murdered never existed and that the families of supposed victims and the local authorities were "crisis actors." There was not a shred of evidence to support any of it, and his followers proceeded to harass and physically threaten the parents of the murdered children.

Mainstream media may produces opinion pieces and commentary that are distorted by their political agenda, but they can't "lie" because they would be subject to libel suits, with punitive and compensatory damages. The only reason Alex Jones recanted of his Sandy Hook claims is he is under thread of libel suits which would levy heavy damages, such that all future earnings could be seized by the victims.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 23, 2021, 07:40:37 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 07:28:56 AM
It was a common occurrence. Mistreatment of blacks and racism is commonplace among police, unfortunately. Before the age of smartphones police got away by saying ALL blacks are lying. Nowadays it is more difficult.

There racial spin involved. American police kill four times as many people as the police in comparable developed countries (such as Canada). Black people are disproportionally represented, but people of all races in the U.S. are vulnerable to police violence. It is related to police training that emphasizes a militaristic attitude and dominating a situation rather than deescalating a situation.

Activists who want to reduce police violence would do well to emphasize that everyone is subject to this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 23, 2021, 09:52:01 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 07:28:56 AM
It was a common occurrence. Mistreatment of blacks and racism is commonplace among police, unfortunately. Before the age of smartphones police got away by saying ALL blacks are lying. Nowadays it is more difficult.

I have to applaud you, a Finn, for knowing the subject far better than greg, an American who appears to keep his head lodged in some close, insufficiently ventilated space.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 23, 2021, 09:52:01 AM
I have to applaud you, a Finn, for knowing the subject far better than greg, an American who appears to keep his head lodged in some close, insufficiently ventilated space.

Thanks Karl!  0:) This feels nice, because I have used to being seen as a clueless troll.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 23, 2021, 10:05:35 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 10:02:28 AM
Thanks Karl!  0:) This feels nice, because I have used to being seen as a clueless troll.  ;D

That was merely a verbal strategy. And of course, the Finns have the sisu ...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 10:18:12 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 23, 2021, 10:05:35 AM
And of course, the Finns have the sisu ...  ;D

Sisu! Hell Yeah!  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 23, 2021, 07:11:44 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 23, 2021, 07:28:56 AM
It was a common occurrence.
Depends on how you want to define "common," I guess. The odds of anyone getting shot and killed by the police while unarmed are very low.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/03/police-black-killings-homicide-rates-race-injustice-column/3235072001/
QuoteSuch self defense may be understandable if the police were engaging in an epidemic of shooting unarmed Black men and women, as we now hear daily — but there is no such epidemic. For the last five years, the police have fatally shot about 1,000 civilians annually, the vast majority of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. Black people account for about 23% of those shot and killed by police; they are about 13% of the U.S. population.

As of the June 22 update, the Washington Post's database of fatal police shootings showed 14 unarmed Black victims and 25 unarmed white victims in 2019. The database does not include those killed by other means, like George Floyd.

QuoteIdeally, officers would never take anyone's life in the course of their duties. But given the number of arrests they make each year (around 10 million) and the number of deadly-weapons attacks on officers (an average of 27 per day in just two-thirds of the nation's police departments, according to a 2014 analysis), it is not clear that these 1,000 civilian shooting deaths suggest that law enforcement is out of control.
So it doesn't mention non-white or black, but we could probably guess around another 20 people.
~59 or so unarmed people total out of 10 million arrests is not great, but I wouldn't call this "common" from that perspective.

If you are expecting like 0-5, I think those are just unreasonable and idealistic expectations. Cops are scared and do stupid things while in possession of guns. It's inevitable this stuff is going to happen given 10 million arrests involving officers handcuffing people or whatever the interaction may be.


Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 23, 2021, 07:36:20 AM
If any deadly violence was incited (and there was relatively little) it was incited by the true circumstances of the case.
And how would you know that? How would you know that mainstream media didn't fan the flames? That's what stochastic terrorism is referring to. The narrative they put out inciting the rage. It's not just the story itself, it's also what they choose to report on. I shared around that time a videocam of a white man being shot in cold blood by a police officer, people here just said that guns are bad and cause the trouble. The mainstream media didn't report on it, and protests were very local and short-lived. Because the narrative was that he was white, so it didn't matter. Only black lives matter, I guess. It's racially charged stories that are the biggest rage-bait and profit-maker. So there is less incentive to report on that type of stories. Black lives matter to the mainstream media because it gives them more attention and money when these stories are published.

The difference between this and Alex Jones is that Jones is wrong, while this is misleading. That's not what I'm aiming to compare. What I'm saying is that both can contribute to "stochastic terrorism."

For years, they only hyperfocus on the stories where black men are shot and killed by the police.
That creates the narrative of this:


Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 23, 2021, 07:40:37 AM
Black people are disproportionally represented
See my above statistics.
14 unarmed black people and 25 unarmed white people killed by police in 2019.
Okay, so yes, technically it should be 6 black people if you want to be proportional.

But 1) that's a small sample size and 2) that alone disregards the reasons.


The reasons could possibly be explained by the disproportional amount of murders and robberies committed by black offenders compared to white offenders. In a more high pressure situation, even if the offenders are unarmed, it could lead to these situations.

https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/ucr.asp?table_in=2

However, that is a guess and that alone doesn't matter. It's just 8 people over the statistical average in that year.


And this misleading narrative lead to this:
Quote
By the end of June, at least 14,000 people had been arrested[3][36][37] and, by November 2020, 25 people had died in relation to the unrest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests


Not to mention this:
QuoteNevertheless, arson, vandalism, and looting between May 26 and June 8 were tabulated to have caused $1–2 billion in insured damages nationally—the highest recorded damage from civil disorder in U.S. history, surpassing the record set during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.[5][40]


In summary, if there still more existing stories to report on of unarmed white Americans murdered by the cops, then why does the mainstream media exclusively focus on stories of black victims? Money. And what does this cause? Stochastic terrorism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 23, 2021, 10:38:14 PM
Got any black neighbours? I suggest talking to them for what I can only assume will be the first time and ask their opinion about this. I suspect they will tell you the issue was not the murder in isolation but the culture of racist attitudes from the police that has had every one of them treated as potential/probable criminals for their whole lives and they always feel just one comment away from being hurt by police in any encounter.

What added fuel to the fire of the George Floyd issue was not the fact of reporting on it but Trumps refusal to calm tensions with empathy or tiny talk of removing bad apple cops but antagonizing thesituation seemingly in the hope of being granted emergency powers from a crisis situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 01:20:34 AM
Quote from: greg on September 23, 2021, 07:11:44 PM
Depends on how you want to define "common," I guess. The odds of anyone getting shot and killed by the police while unarmed are very low.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/03/police-black-killings-homicide-rates-race-injustice-column/3235072001/

The odds of getting shot is one thing. Another thing is what skin color does the people who get shot have? Your link says:

The African American community tends to be policed more heavily, because that is where people are disproportionately hurt by violent street crime. In New York City in 2018, 73% of shooting victims were Black, though Black residents comprise only 24% of the city's population.

The goal should be zero deaths by police. Unfortunately this is not always possible. In some situations police has to use leathal force to protect others. The police culture in the US is to shoot first and ask questions later, especially when encountering black people.This is a clear fact and I won't "debate" over it any further.

Also, police killings is not everything. Racism also shows in how police treads black people compared to white people. Police harrashing black people for no good reason is common.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 24, 2021, 01:27:29 AM
Dutch 12 year old boy goes to court to get judge to cast deciding vote as to whether or not he can get a Covid vaccine shot.  His mother wants him to get it, but her ex-husband said no.  He (the boy) really wants to spend time with his dying grandmother.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58669918

Surprised to see that there is increasing vaccine skepticism in the Netherlands.   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 01:38:09 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 24, 2021, 01:27:29 AM
Dutch 12 year old boy goes to court to get judge to cast deciding vote as to whether or not he can get a Covid vaccine shot.  His mother wants him to get it, but her ex-husband said no.  He (the boy) really wants to spend time with his dying grandmother.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58669918

Surprised to see that there is increasing vaccine skepticism in the Netherlands.   :(

PD

It says the boy WON in the court and can have the jab.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:55:52 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 24, 2021, 01:27:29 AM
Dutch 12 year old boy goes to court to get judge to cast deciding vote as to whether or not he can get a Covid vaccine shot.  His mother wants him to get it, but her ex-husband said no.  He (the boy) really wants to spend time with his dying grandmother.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58669918

Surprised to see that there is increasing vaccine skepticism in the Netherlands.   :(

PD

I don't think it is in creasing. Full vaccination is now over 82% and expected to go up to around 90% in the weeks to come.

The issue is that now almost everybody around them is vaccinated and social pressure is rising, the stance of antivaxers and the social debate are hardening.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 02:58:14 AM
Now 60 % of Finns are fully vaccinated. They say in the end of October enough people will be vaccinated to "open" the society, but we'll see. All we need is a new variant and we are back in square one.  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 03:06:42 AM
Quote from: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:55:52 AM
I don't think it is in creasing. Full vaccination is now over 82% and expected to go up to around 90% in the weeks to come.

The issue is that now almost everybody around them is vaccinated and social pressure is rising, the stance of antivaxers and the social debate are hardening.

These numbers are for adults, right? With delta-variant that is deceiving, because also children are affected easily. I believe the Netherlands is around 71 % ref whole population for at least one shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 24, 2021, 05:44:24 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 01:38:09 AM
It says the boy WON in the court and can have the jab.  :)
Yes, and I'm happy for him.  Sorry for the confusion, but the "frowny face" was for the news in the article about the number of anti-vexers increasing in the Netherlands.

Quote from: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:55:52 AM
I don't think it is increasing. Full vaccination is now over 82% and expected to go up to around 90% in the weeks to come.

The issue is that now almost everybody around them is vaccinated and social pressure is rising, the stance of antivaxers and the social debate are hardening.
So, if I'm understanding you correctly, the minority is getting more vocal?

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on September 24, 2021, 07:40:48 AM
Quote from: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:55:52 AM
I don't think it is in creasing. Full vaccination is now over 82% and expected to go up to around 90% in the weeks to come.

The issue is that now almost everybody around them is vaccinated and social pressure is rising, the stance of antivaxers and the social debate are hardening.

I agree. We see a hardening of positions from both sides here, too. A law has been passed yesterday to prevent anti-vax manifestations around schools and hospitals (they would gather around students with megaphones and harass them). Lots of tensions as anti-vaxxers see their options running out... >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on September 24, 2021, 08:14:22 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 23, 2021, 10:38:14 PM
but the culture of racist attitudes from the police
This is certainly a problem. But also there is also a problem with the hypermasculine gangster culture in black communities which glorifies running from the police and resisting arrest. Also a problem is the narrative of the cops being racist by default- it's going to lead to a defensive reaction, leading to more likelihood of escalation.

There was story I heard on NPR years ago about a young black man driving on a country road and the cops tried to pull him over. He got scared because he was hearing stories about what cops have done before when pulling people over on country roads. So he drove a while to get to a safe place, a gas station or something. By then, the cops thought he was trying to run away from him and treated him aggressively. So you see how the situation is not exactly one-sided and having a certain narrative in mind makes things more complicated. The cop could have been bad. But also could have been just fine, you really don't know.


Quote from: SimonNZ on September 23, 2021, 10:38:14 PM
that has had every one of them treated as potential/probable criminals for their whole lives and they always feel just one comment away from being hurt by police in any encounter.
Not necessarily the case, people's experience varies. This is narrative, not actual fact.



Quote from: SimonNZ on September 23, 2021, 10:38:14 PM
I suggest talking to them for what I can only assume will be the first time
Probably about a third of my childhood friends were black, the environment I grew up in wasn't exactly the ghetto, but it was much closer to what we're talking about then people from places like New Zealand or Finland.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on September 24, 2021, 09:26:19 AM
Quote from: André on September 24, 2021, 07:40:48 AM
I agree. We see a hardening of positions from both sides here, too. A law has been passed yesterday to prevent anti-vax manifestations around schools and hospitals (they would gather around students with megaphones and harass them). Lots of tensions as anti-vaxxers see their options running out... >:(

Same thing here, André.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 10:18:02 AM
Quote from: greg on September 24, 2021, 08:14:22 AM
Probably about a third of my childhood friends were black, the environment I grew up in wasn't exactly the ghetto, but it was much closer to what we're talking about then people from places like New Zealand or Finland.

We have black people here in Finland. I'm sure there are black people in New Zealand. We have racism in Finland. I'm sure there's racism in  New Zealand as well. Simon and I living far away from the US in much more white countries doesn't mean we can't understand racism and how racism manifests itself in the US police/politics/society. All it really takes is to go beyond white priviledge upholding mainstream media.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 24, 2021, 10:26:17 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 03:06:42 AM
These numbers are for adults, right? With delta-variant that is deceiving, because also children are affected easily. I believe the Netherlands is around 71 % ref whole population for at least one shot.

Correct - from 18 years. Though 12-18 years old are now being vaccinated as well.

Edit: the percentage of full vaccination of anyone over 12 years old is 79%.
https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/people-who-had-one-jab-after-having-covid-19-now-included-in-vaccination-coverage-figures

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 24, 2021, 05:44:24 AM
So, if I'm understanding you correctly, the minority is getting more vocal?

You could say it like that, "hysterical" paints a more accurate picture. Like Americans the Dutch don't like others to tell them what to do, but the difference is the trust in authorities - which is high with the Dutch and rather low in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:48:38 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 01:39:08 PM
"People who had one jab after having COVID-19 now included in vaccination coverage figures for full vaccination."

Finland has used vaccination numbers ref whole population and full vaccination means full vaccination: 73.5 % for at least one jab and 60.0 % for fully vaccinated. Making the numbers look good with math tricks doesn't help with the pandemic.

People who experienced a Covid infection before vaccination, are only vaccinated once instead of two times.
It's not a math trick, they are fully vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 24, 2021, 02:19:22 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 24, 2021, 02:58:14 AM
Now 60 % of Finns are fully vaccinated. They say in the end of October enough people will be vaccinated to "open" the society, but we'll see. All we need is a new variant and we are back in square one.  :(

Really? Why would that be so?

The article below suggests otherwise

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/300415920/when-does-covid-become-a-cold-the-imperfect-science-of-ending-the-pandemic

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2021, 06:19:27 AM
Quote from: Holden on September 24, 2021, 02:19:22 PM
Really? Why would that be so?

The article below suggests otherwise

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/300415920/when-does-covid-become-a-cold-the-imperfect-science-of-ending-the-pandemic



Interesting, thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 06:24:50 AM
Quote from: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:55:52 AM
I don't think it is in creasing. Full vaccination is now over 82% and expected to go up to around 90% in the weeks to come.

The issue is that now almost everybody around them is vaccinated and social pressure is rising, the stance of antivaxers and the social debate are hardening.

Why have you introduced vaccine passports in Holland?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 25, 2021, 07:26:03 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 06:24:50 AM
Why have you introduced vaccine passports in Holland?

A controversial decision, which is aimed at allowing clubs, etc. to reopen and mass events like concerts and festivals to take place again. Of course, the consequence is that no vaccination = no admittance.

BTW During my holiday in France I haven't been allowed into any bar, restaurant or museum without my EU vaccination passport!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2021, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: Que on September 25, 2021, 07:26:03 AM
A controversial decision, which is aimed at allowing clubs, etc. to reopen and mass events like concerts and festivals to take place again. Of course, the consequence is that no vaccination = no admittance.

Well, "if you want to socialize, get the vaccine" is a perfectly reasonable approach.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 25, 2021, 07:28:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 25, 2021, 07:28:00 AM
Well, "if you want to socialize, get the vaccine" is a perfectly reasonable approach.

Absolutely!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:44:47 AM
Quote from: Que on September 25, 2021, 07:26:03 AM
A controversial decision, which is aimed at allowing clubs, etc. to reopen and mass events like concerts and festivals to take place again. Of course, the consequence is that no vaccination = no admittance.

BTW During my holiday in France I haven't been allowed into any bar, restaurant or museum without my EU vaccination passport!

Yes well France did it to get the vaccine rate up, Holland doesn't have that problem.

I think that we are starting to see political consequences of the pandemic. Politicians have learned that people in Europe are open to being divided, controlled and surveilled, which is nice if you see your role as one of governing, managing, the people.

I have a test which I apply in these sort of situations: I ask myself what Reinhard Heydrich would have done with the information and control infrastructure being put into place. There will be other Heydrichs. Covid has made us so sacred, and we have been made so scared of COVID,  that, IMO, there is a high degree of complacency and wilful blindness.

The government here has been prevented from taking the step of implementing passports by their right wing, but you can sense that there is a strong desire to seize the moment and put these measures in place, IMO for obvious reasons, not necessarily health reasons.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:50:52 AM
Quote from: Que on September 25, 2021, 07:28:45 AM
Absolutely!

Did your government share its models showing the predicted effect of the passports on the evolution of the pandemic? Or was it all just hand waving?  If they did share the models, could I see a link?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 07:55:42 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 06:24:50 AM
Why have you introduced vaccine passports in Holland?

They are planning vaccine passports in Finland too. Of course our own "MAGA" party for racists and other low information voters, the True Finns, is against it, but all other parties are for it to my knowledge. Instead of keeping some things closed for everybody, vaccine passports allow opening those things for vaccinated people. The bonus is it motivates unvaccinated people to get vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:56:56 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 07:55:42 AM
They are planning vaccine passports in Finland too. . . .  all other parties are for it to my knowledge.

I'm sure they are, it's a politician's dream.

Let me ask you the same question as I asked que -- Did your government share its models showing the predicted effect of the passports on the evolution of the pandemic? Or was it all just hand waving?  If they did share the models, could I see a link?


Generally it's quite difficult to assess the impact of a non pharmaceutical intervention on the evolution of the pandemic in a country. I hope very much that soon there will be a rational discussion of what was effective, and what was hard to justify in terms of benefits and costs. Closing primary schools, closing frontiers, vaccine passports, closing retail outlets, stopping friends meeting in small groups, making face coverings a requirement, keeping 2m apart  . . . work from home . . . were these really justifiable? It will be interesting to see what the most considered opinions are.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 08:07:41 AM
Quote from: Que on September 24, 2021, 01:48:38 PM
People who experienced a Covid infection before vaccination, are only vaccinated once instead of two times.
It's not a math trick, they are fully vaccinated.

I see your point. ;) The amount of "fully vaccinated" is larger than the amount of people with two jabs.

One jab > fully vaccinated > two jabs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 08:12:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:56:56 AM
I'm sure they are, it's a politician's dream.

Let me ask you the same question as I asked que -- Did your government share its models showing the predicted effect of the passports on the evolution of the pandemic? Or was it all just hand waving?  If they did share the models, could I see a link?


Generally it's quite difficult to assess the impact of a non pharmaceutical intervention on the evolution of the pandemic in a country. I hope very much that soon there will be a rational discussion of what was effective, and what was hard to justify in terms of benefits and costs. Closing primary schools, closing frontiers, vaccine passports, closing retail outlets, stopping friends meeting in small groups, making face coverings a requirement, keeping 2m apart  . . . work from home . . . were these really justifiable? It will be interesting to see what the most considered opinions are.

I have not seen any models. The logic as far as I have understood is the vaccines protect well against hospitalization. So, even if covid spreads among vaccinated people (in places where they can go with corona passports) the burden to the healthcare system stays low.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:16:08 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 08:12:11 AM
I have not seen any models. The logic as far as I have understood is the vaccines protect well against hospitalization. So, even if covid spreads among vaccinated people (in places where they can go with corona passports) the burden to the healthcare system stays low.

Yes, it's interesting that a measure like passports for admission to a bar or club can be just waved through with that sort of "gestural" argument. Has there been any mention of the conditions which would trigger removing passports, or are they now seen as a permanent feature?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2021, 08:16:45 AM
I don't see anyone "scared of COVID" and I wonder why you're pushing this.  I see people taking a public health threat seriously, and taking reasonable precautions. Of course, here in the US, down in the Death Cult Belt, we also see people recklessly disregarding considerations of the public weal.
My organist, who is also a nurse and a Lutheran pastor, was hospitalized for COVID, she still needs oxygen at night. She (for instance) is not "scared of COVID," she is adopting sensible safety measures and continuing her work, including a ministry to the homeless in Salem.

So, if you see people "scared of COVID" show us a link, I for one am interested.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 25, 2021, 08:17:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:50:52 AM
Did your government share its models showing the predicted effect of the passports on the evolution of the pandemic? Or was it all just hand waving?  If they did share the models, could I see a link?

I think what comes into play here is the previous rash lifting of all restrictions in the Netherlands that went terribly wrong, with mass infections in a club and a pop music festival. The Dutch govt doesn't want to risk that kind of situation again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:18:23 AM
Quote from: Que on September 25, 2021, 08:17:00 AM
I think what comes into play here is the previous rash lifting of all restrictions in the Netherlands tHt sent terribly

Yes. So now they have a sort of carte blanche. Maybe you trust these people who govern your country, maybe they are working for the best for the people. In the UK they were all put there by big global capitalists, the press, the media. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2021, 08:19:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:18:23 AM
Yes. So now they have a sort of carte blanche.

What a curious remark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 25, 2021, 08:29:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:18:23 AM
Yes. So now they have a sort of carte blanche. Maybe you trust these people who govern your country, maybe they are working for the best for the people. In the UK they were all put there by big global capitalists, the press, the media.

Well, as a servant of the Crown, I'm probably biased. But the Netherlands has a long standing tradition of high trust in government, even before full-fleged democracy came about.

BTW From a capitalistic angle: the fewer restrictions, the better....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:36:08 AM
Quote from: Que on September 25, 2021, 08:29:27 AM
Well, as a servant of the Crown, I'm probably biased. But the Netherlands has a long standing tradition of high trust in government, even before full-fleged democracy came about.

BTW From a capitalistic angle: the fewer restrictions, the better....  Doesn't quite add up, does it?  ::)

Yes and what has surprised me, though maybe I was naive about this, is how ready the left are to sacrifice freedoms.

I don't believe that from a capitalist angle, the fewer restrictions the better. Capitalist operations seek to control the people to make them work and spend in a way that makes the capitalist class a profit. The freedom in parliamentary capitalism is an illusion, theatre. Look at the way that capitalist governments have used social media data to manage the electoral process.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 25, 2021, 10:01:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 08:16:08 AM
Yes, it's interesting that a measure like passports for admission to a bar or club can be just waved through with that sort of "gestural" argument. Has there been any mention of the conditions which would trigger removing passports, or are they now seen as a permanent feature?

Well, in Finland it is not easy to "just wave through". There are tons of legal issues involved. We do not have passports yet. Maybe we won't have. It is just one tool to open society. We are in pandemic. Passports are one tool to manage somehow... ...of course it is no permanent. Soon we want to get to post pandemic world where this is not needed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 10:19:41 AM
It's hard for me to predict what will happen in the UK. We have avoided passports saying that it looks as though we don't need them because there are enough vaccinated people to ensure that hospitalisations stay at a manageable level, that it's better not to introduce such a strong social intervention if possible.

Vaccinations among vulnerable groups here is indeed high, with 90% of over 16s having started the vaccination process. But it's not at all clear whether that alone is enough to keep enough of a lid on things. Time will tell. And the leisure industry has been warned that passports may be introduced, they've been told to prepare themselves, that they may only get a week's notice  . . .

Clearly the seriousness of the 2021-22 flu epidemic is a big factor.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:27:37 PM
It's worth remembering that proof of vaccinations has long existed in a variety of contexts including school and travel. Do you find those sensible or another example of government overreach and control?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 25, 2021, 01:28:21 PM
Vaccine passports are pointless. Let's look at this from a simple standpoint. You are either vaccinated or you aren't. If you are vaccinated, then your chances of catching Covid are significantly reduced and if you do get it then the effects will be very mild. This is what the vaccine does. No worries for you.

If you are unvaccinated then the reverse is probably true, however, it was your decision not to be vaccinated so the consequences are fairly and squarely on your own head. In either case, a vaccine certificate will not make you any safer from those who are vaccinated and those who aren't. It's just a piece of paper saying that you've conformed to your governments wishes.

I have no issues with being in the same room as anyone who is unvaccinated because the jab has made me basically immune to any dire effects from Covid.

I can however, see a few reasons for a vaccination certificate and they are all situational and involve certain establishments. Yes, the unvaccinated should not be permitted to enter aged care facilities and certain medical establishments. The reason being is that there are people there who are at a higher risk of being severely impacted. For example, when I went to see my oncologist the other day there was a sign in the lift saying that masks were mandatory on a certain floor where chemotherapy treatment was being carried out. That, to me makes sense.

The awful thing is that the governments of many countries will refuse entry to the unvaccinated when it is not really necessary.

Finally, I have a document on my phone stating that I have been fully jabbed - will this suffice as a vaccine passport? Time will tell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:33:31 PM
[I guess I'll ask you the same question:


It's worth remembering that proof of vaccinations has long existed in a variety of contexts including school and travel. Do you find those sensible or another example of government overreach and control?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:35:22 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:33:31 PM
[I guess I'll ask you the same question I asked above:


It's worth remembering that proof of vaccinations has long existed in a variety of contexts including school and travel. Do you find those sensible or another example of government overreach and control?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 25, 2021, 04:44:22 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:33:31 PM
[I guess I'll ask you the same question:


It's worth remembering that proof of vaccinations has long existed in a variety of contexts including school and travel. Do you find those sensible or another example of government overreach and control?

For schools possibly, though the list of diseases is very small and doesn't include the likes of influenza. For international travel I've never seen the point, especially considering that the main one cited, small pox, has been eradicated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 25, 2021, 05:24:33 PM
Quote from: Holden on September 25, 2021, 04:44:22 PM
For schools possibly, though the list of diseases is very small and doesn't include the likes of influenza. For international travel I've never seen the point, especially considering that the main one cited, small pox, has been eradicated.

Well, we thought measles was eradicated, until some anti-vaxxers on the West Coast gave it human petri dishes....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 06:52:00 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 01:27:37 PM
It's worth remembering that proof of vaccinations has long existed in a variety of contexts including school and travel. Do you find those sensible or another example of government overreach and control?

Not in the Uk for school as far as I know, or for entry into the country. I don't know about other countries. I'm not sure what I think about it, though it does seem prima facie iffy to refuse a child an education because his parents decline, rightly or wrongly, to get him vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 25, 2021, 07:01:47 PM
For the discussion, let me remind people that my initial question to que was why Holland has introduced vaccine passports when it has a high rate of vaccination. I can see what France did it, as it had a very low rate of vaccination. Vaccine passports are clearly an effective nudge, and I can see that there's an argument for that in utilitarian terms. The same argument may apply in some US states.

What disturbs me is that lack of openness about the decision. It seems that in both Holland and Finland at least passports have been waved through without the facts of the matter being laid open to scrutiny by the people. Yes introducing vaccines may reduce transmission, but by how much? It's hardly an anodyne measure, its usefulness obviously depends on the extent of vaccination in place without it, and the reduction of transmission may not justify the reduction in liberty - who can say? Not me.

Don't forget that passports are a means of controlling and monitoring the population. There is associated big data, an unvaccinated underclass is created etc. It is hardly a no brainer!

I don't think it's a good idea to trust government in parliamentary capitalism because, in that system, the leaders do not have the best interests of the people as a priority.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 09:08:12 PM
Singapore thought they were ready to open up with an 80 % vaccination but now have their largest infection rates in over a year.

Norway is right now going to complete freedom with 60-something %.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 26, 2021, 12:09:43 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 25, 2021, 09:08:12 PM
Singapore thought they were ready to open up with an 80 % vaccination but now have their largest infection rates in over a year.

Norway is right now going to complete freedom with 60-something %.

Of course if you remove non pharmaceutical interventions you will have a lot of people getting infected. Many will have very mild symptoms - the sniffles - or no symptoms at all. What matters more is how many people need hospital care. In terms of vaccination, what matters is that the vulnerable people are protected - i.e. the over 18s.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 12:20:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 26, 2021, 12:09:43 AM
Of course if you remove non pharmaceutical interventions you will have a lot of people getting infected. Many will have very mild symptoms - the sniffles - or no symptoms at all. What matters more is how many people need hospital care. In terms of vaccination, what matters is that the vulnerable people are protected - i.e. the over 18s.

Singapore reports worst daily Covid case tally in more than a year (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/15/singapore-reports-biggest-spike-in-covid-cases-in-a-year-despite-81-vaccination-rate)

"[...]As of Tuesday, a total of 809 people were in hospital. Of these, 75 were seriously ill and required oxygen, and nine were in intensive care. The majority of seriously ill patients were older than 66, according to the Ministry of Health.

Eighty-one per cent of the entire population is fully vaccinated – excluding under-12s, it is 90% – and the number of seriously ill patients is fairly low overall. Just four people have died in the past 28 days, all of whom were unvaccinated, according to the health ministry.

However, the number of those seriously ill is increasing. The number of patients requiring oxygen doubled to 54 on Sunday from two days before, an important gauge to judge whether the medical system could get overwhelmed.[...]"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 26, 2021, 01:36:31 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 12:20:56 AM
Singapore reports worst daily Covid case tally in more than a year (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/15/singapore-reports-biggest-spike-in-covid-cases-in-a-year-despite-81-vaccination-rate)

"[...]As of Tuesday, a total of 809 people were in hospital. Of these, 75 were seriously ill and required oxygen, and nine were in intensive care. The majority of seriously ill patients were older than 66, according to the Ministry of Health.

Eighty-one per cent of the entire population is fully vaccinated – excluding under-12s, it is 90% – and the number of seriously ill patients is fairly low overall. Just four people have died in the past 28 days, all of whom were unvaccinated, according to the health ministry.

However, the number of those seriously ill is increasing. The number of patients requiring oxygen doubled to 54 on Sunday from two days before, an important gauge to judge whether the medical system could get overwhelmed.[...]"

Sure, so now we're in a real difficult area, but an unavoidable one IMO. First there's the question of how many seriously ill covid patients the health system can support - complex because a health system is very big  and you can always find some room by moving the furniture around - you rob Peter to pay Paul.

And secondly, and much more problematically, you have to judge whether the health costs of an open society are counterbalanced by the social and economic benefits.

As I said, there is no avoiding these decisions - and there is no right answer IMO. The whole world is between a rock and a hard place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 01:51:52 AM
Hospitals in most countries have already been cut back so much over the last decades that they were operating at near or right on full capacity in non pandemic times.

And you can possibly find more rooms and perhaps you can create the infrastructure for those rooms and buy equipment in time - though highly unlikely - but they definitely can not magic up new doctors and nurses. Any retirees and qualified people who had changed jobs were already rounded up at the start of the outbreak. And burnout and infection mean the numbers can only go down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 26, 2021, 01:56:02 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 01:51:52 AM
Hospitals in most countries have already been cut back so they are operating at near or right on full capacity in non pandemic times.

And you can possibly find more rooms and perhaps you can create the I frastructure for those rooms and buy equipment in time - though highly unlikely - but they definitely can not magic up new doctors and nurses.

What you do is you tell people who need elective procedures they'll have to wait longer. There may be staffing problems, people will have to do jobs which they're not fully qualified for, they'll learn on the job.  The quality of the public health service will reduce - that's all part of the cost.

At some point the people with the power have to say: when hospitalisations reach X we just have to put the brakes on. But that X is a value judgement - it involves deciding what sort of health system you want to offer the people - how many compromises you are prepared to make. Longer wait for a hip replacement, some cancer patients slip through the net and die sooner as a result,  but society stays open longer.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 02:27:39 AM
Well that's not a world I want to live on.

And you do realize that "the powers that be" there will be governments making and implementing and enforcing these sweeping changes, right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on September 26, 2021, 07:52:32 AM
In relation to the vaccine passport thing: in New Zealand, I was asked for proof of vaccination several times, despite it not being legally necessary (& the rate of vaccination still being quite low at the time), including when travelling. At the moment, I'm overseas in a city with a well-publicised vaccine mandate, including a vaccine passport app and signs outside most establishments announcing that proof of vaccination will be necessary to enter. I've only once been asked to actually present proof of vaccination, didn't have it with me on that occasion, and was waved through anyway with the person (a cashier) saying "sorry, we just gotta ask everyone that".

In New Zealand almost everyone wore masks when required to. Here in the USA I've seen people remove masks even directly underneath signs instructing them to wear masks, with authority figures not caring (except again in one case, in a library; the librarian on duty did ask people to wear masks if they weren't, and they complied while within her line of sight, but probably not otherwise).

I'm not sure what this means or whether it is related to the very high COVID-19 death toll in the USA compared to other countries where mask-wearing is more socially acceptable and vaccine passports are more strictly enforced. This death toll may after all be more related to problems with the American health system, or other factors; I'd be curious to know what mask use, vaccine restrictions, etc are like in other countries that continue to be severely affected (Mexico, Russia, Iran) or countries that had very severe outbreaks which have been effectively reduced in severity (India, Indonesia, Peru).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 26, 2021, 10:18:26 AM
Quote from: amw on September 26, 2021, 07:52:32 AM

Here in the USA I've seen people remove masks even directly underneath signs instructing them to wear masks, with authority figures not caring (except again in one case, in a library; the librarian on duty did ask people to wear masks if they weren't, and they complied while within her line of sight, but probably not otherwise).


That suggests to me that mask wearing is pretty unlikely to ever be an effective non pharmaceutical intervention in the USA. If there's a lot of resistance it's just never going to do much good. (Bit like illegal weed!)

As far as I know the impact of all NPIs is very poorly understood. For example, what was the impact of closing infant and junior schools on the epidemic?  I just don't think anyone can answer that except by saying not very helpful things like "less of an impact than closing senior schools." What we can say for sure is that closing infant and junior schools had a very negative effect on the kids!

Same for mask wearing in different contexts - when I was last in Nice it was compulsory to wear masks outside, on the Promenade des Anglais, with the fucking mistral blowing. I must say, I think it bodes ill for the future cooperation of the people when the politicians impose rules which obviously don't make much sense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 26, 2021, 11:31:32 PM
Quote from: amw on September 26, 2021, 07:52:32 AM
In relation to the vaccine passport thing: in New Zealand, I was asked for proof of vaccination several times, despite it not being legally necessary (& the rate of vaccination still being quite low at the time), including when travelling. At the moment, I'm overseas in a city with a well-publicised vaccine mandate, including a vaccine passport app and signs outside most establishments announcing that proof of vaccination will be necessary to enter. I've only once been asked to actually present proof of vaccination, didn't have it with me on that occasion, and was waved through anyway with the person (a cashier) saying "sorry, we just gotta ask everyone that".

In New Zealand almost everyone wore masks when required to. Here in the USA I've seen people remove masks even directly underneath signs instructing them to wear masks, with authority figures not caring (except again in one case, in a library; the librarian on duty did ask people to wear masks if they weren't, and they complied while within her line of sight, but probably not otherwise).

I'm not sure what this means or whether it is related to the very high COVID-19 death toll in the USA compared to other countries where mask-wearing is more socially acceptable and vaccine passports are more strictly enforced. This death toll may after all be more related to problems with the American health system, or other factors; I'd be curious to know what mask use, vaccine restrictions, etc are like in other countries that continue to be severely affected (Mexico, Russia, Iran) or countries that had very severe outbreaks which have been effectively reduced in severity (India, Indonesia, Peru).

In Australia, yes you can ask someone if they've been vaccinated but unless you hold special powers that person is not required to confirm it. I suspect that NZ would be the same.

Which brings me onto mask wearing. Please read this carefully. Mask rules in QLD were changed last Friday. The new rules states that if you are indoors and are standing you must wear a mask. However, the simple act of sitting down means that you don't have to. This could suggest a number of things:

Covid only infects people who are standing
If you are sitting down you are safe from Covid
I'm wondering if the QLD govt has discovered that Covid is anally transmitted and haven't told us.

Any ideas as to why this would be effective?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 11:45:26 PM
My first guess would be that businesses you'd want to sit down in involve eating and drinking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 27, 2021, 02:58:40 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 11:45:26 PM
My first guess would be that businesses you'd want to sit down in involve eating and drinking.

...but this is all encompassing and includes the likes of schools, other workplaces, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 27, 2021, 07:11:06 PM
Quote from: Holden on September 27, 2021, 02:58:40 PM
...but this is all encompassing and includes the likes of schools, other workplaces, etc.

The idea is this: the kids in school can learn more or less while wearing a mask, they're leaning is probably impeded but not prevented. Similarly for workers: they can continue to work masked, maybe not as well as before but they can do something. But the punters in a restaurant can't eat at all with a mask. So enforcing mask wearing in restaurants is tantamount to closing them down, which has very undesirable economic consequences.

The decisions about how to manage an epidemic are not purely health decisions, because the problem concerns a society - the problem is about controlling the impact of the virus on society.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 28, 2021, 04:09:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 21, 2021, 04:10:06 AM
Still a good development here in DK, with a positive percentage below 1% in tests, typically 250 - 500 cases per day, and a fall in the number of hospitalizations, from about 140 to now 96, within a few weeks, and in spite of the general opening up. Today's calculated R number is again 0.7

Experts find it puzzling, and are ascribing it to the vaccination rate, but they still warn for a later 4th and 5th wave.

A slight increase here in DK in the last 3 days, and sadly, experts are predicting between 1500 and 4000 daily cases later in the late autumn/winter, due to a lot of factors. Today the calculated R number went up from 0.7 to 1.1.

As it has been described, the virus is expected to survive among non-vaccinated and young people/children, in spite of the high vaccine rate (now 75.9 % of the total population of all ages), and spread from there. I hope these predictions will be proven wrong, but they are probably correct.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 28, 2021, 04:31:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 28, 2021, 04:09:02 AM
A slight increase here in DK in the last 3 days, and sadly, experts are predicting between 1500 and 4000 daily cases later in the late autumn/winter, due to a lot of factors. Today the calculated R number went up from 0.7 to 1.1.

As it has been described, the virus is expected to survive among non-vaccinated and young people/children, in spite of the high vaccine rate, and spread from there. I hope these predictions will be proven wrong, but they are probably correct.
Eek!  And I hope that their predictions are wrong.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 28, 2021, 04:36:02 AM
Thank you - yes, hopefully there'll be more positive developments generally.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on September 28, 2021, 07:45:17 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on September 26, 2021, 11:45:26 PM
My first guess would be that businesses you'd want to sit down in involve eating and drinking.
I always thought it was very polite of SARS-CoV-2 to not infect people while they're eating or drinking, thereby allowing restaurants to remain open (even if only with outdoor seating). Very sportsmanlike, really.

(I'm sure that measures such as masks are effective at preventing transmission of the virus under laboratory conditions. Under real-world conditions, most people do not wear masks correctly, or choose masks that don't adequately block aerosol transmission, or both; people remove their masks to eat and drink, or whenever they believe they have sufficient distance from other people; etc. Given that virions can survive for ~72 hours on many surfaces, this sense of security is obviously false.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 12:28:43 PM
Quote from: amw on September 28, 2021, 07:45:17 AM
I always thought it was very polite of SARS-CoV-2 to not infect people while they're eating or drinking, thereby allowing restaurants to remain open (even if only with outdoor seating). Very sportsmanlike, really.

(I'm sure that measures such as masks are effective at preventing transmission of the virus under laboratory conditions. Under real-world conditions, most people do not wear masks correctly, or choose masks that don't adequately block aerosol transmission, or both; people remove their masks to eat and drink, or whenever they believe they have sufficient distance from other people; etc. Given that virions can survive for ~72 hours on many surfaces, this sense of security is obviously false.)

I might be mistaken, but I believe that although SOME virions can surface on surfaces for up to 72 hours, the number is not considered sufficient to infect anyone after a few hours, and I think it's been demonstrated that fomites are not a significant mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Aerosols, on the other hand, are to my knowledge the single most important mode of transmission for the virus, even more important than large droplets.

Unfortunately, I agree that in the real world even well-made masks are not as effective as they could be because of improper wearing. I am CONSTANTLY reminding my students to cover their noses. As to taking masks off in restaurants, well yes, you basically have to, and that's why I don't eat at sit-down restaurants except outdoors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 28, 2021, 01:41:48 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 12:28:43 PM
I might be mistaken, but I believe that although SOME virions can surface on surfaces for up to 72 hours, the number is not considered sufficient to infect anyone after a few hours, and I think it's been demonstrated that fomites are not a significant mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Aerosols, on the other hand, are to my knowledge the single most important mode of transmission for the virus, even more important than large droplets.

Unfortunately, I agree that in the real world even well-made masks are not as effective as they could be because of improper wearing. I am CONSTANTLY reminding my students to cover their noses. As to taking masks off in restaurants, well yes, you basically have to, and that's why I don't eat at sit-down restaurants except outdoors.

Well, the fact that you're have to remind your class to cover their noses all the time suggests to me that people in your part of the world don't like wearing them over the nose. And it's going to be very hard, maybe impossible,  to enforce!

I believe you are right to say that aerosol transmission is much more significant than transmission via fomites. But it is expensive to  implement good ventilation in the workplace and in education. That's why in the UK at least the government have chosen to underplay aerosol.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on September 28, 2021, 02:29:39 PM
....and there are people like me who are genuinely mask exempt for medical reasons. I purposely didn't apply for this exemption until I was fully vaccinated and this exacerbated my health issues. I don't wear a mask anywhere but also consider myself very low risk to to others and attempt to socially distance wherever possible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 03:51:31 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 28, 2021, 01:41:48 PM
Well, the fact that you're have to remind your class to cover their noses all the time suggests to me that people in your part of the world don't like wearing them over the nose. And it's going to be very hard, maybe impossible,  to enforce!

I think a big part of the problem is that the masks issued are one size fits all, and the truth is they often don't fit very well. In many cases the standard issue mask is too small for the student's face. But you are right that they don't particularly like wearing them, either, and it's going to be impossible to enforce when the University's mask mandate is lifted (if in fact it is, since we - faculty - are strongly opposed and are putting intense pressure on the administration via the faculty senate to keep the mandate in place).

QuoteI believe you are right to say that aerosol transmission is much more significant than transmission via fomites. But it is expensive to  implement good ventilation in the workplace and in education. That's why in the UK at least the government have chosen to underplay aerosol.

It's expensive yes, and as a result, very little has been done to improve ventilation here. I'm not sure what you mean by "underplay aerosol". Are they actually saying that aerosols are a relatively minor factor in transmission?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 28, 2021, 04:23:04 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on September 28, 2021, 01:41:48 PM
Well, the fact that you're have to remind your class to cover their noses all the time suggests to me that people in your part of the world don't like wearing them over the nose. And it's going to be very hard, maybe impossible,  to enforce!

I believe you are right to say that aerosol transmission is much more significant than transmission via fomites. But it is expensive to  implement good ventilation in the workplace and in education. That's why in the UK at least the government have chosen to underplay aerosol.

Of course, a fact remains a fact, even if a governing agency elects to ignore or disregard it....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 28, 2021, 04:25:10 PM
Someone who wears a mask, but doesn't wear it over the nose, is not wearing the mask.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on September 28, 2021, 07:13:31 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 03:51:31 PM

Are they actually saying that aerosols are a relatively minor factor in transmission?

Well here in the UK they're not doing much to improve the air quality in schools.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 29, 2021, 03:34:33 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 03:51:31 PM
I think a big part of the problem is that the masks issued are one size fits all, and the truth is they often don't fit very well. In many cases the standard issue mask is too small for the student's face. But you are right that they don't particularly like wearing them, either, and it's going to be impossible to enforce when the University's mask mandate is lifted (if in fact it is, since we - faculty - are strongly opposed and are putting intense pressure on the administration via the faculty senate to keep the mandate in place).

It's expensive yes, and as a result, very little has been done to improve ventilation here. I'm not sure what you mean by "underplay aerosol". Are they actually saying that aerosols are a relatively minor factor in transmission?
Are the students given the option of wearing cloth masks or must wear the typical white or blue masks that one can buy at a pharmacy/grocery store?  I have seen cloth masks sold at a pharmacy that came in different sizes; I did buy a pack of three but 99% of the time, I wear your basic pharmacy-type mask.  Alas, the cloth ones don't have that metal strip which helps to make it conform better to your nose and hence face overall.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 29, 2021, 04:29:59 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 03:51:31 PM
In many cases the standard issue mask is too small for the student's face.

Why would a standard adult mask be too small for a child?  Don't you mean too large?  You do know that there are also masks made for children right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 29, 2021, 04:40:19 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 29, 2021, 03:34:33 AM
Are the students given the option of wearing cloth masks or must wear the typical white or blue masks that one can buy at a pharmacy/grocery store?  I have seen cloth masks sold at a pharmacy that came in different sizes; I did buy a pack of three but 99% of the time, I wear your basic pharmacy-type mask.  Alas, the cloth ones don't have that metal strip which helps to make it conform better to your nose and hence face overall.

PD

We're a military college, so the students in the Corps of Cadets are given a standard-issue black mask, all the same size, and they don't have the option of wearing anything else. Between a quarter and a third of the students are "civilian", so they don't have that excuse... but it is the Corps students who have by far the most trouble with their masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 29, 2021, 04:42:05 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 29, 2021, 04:29:59 AM
Why would a standard adult mask be too small for a child?  Don't you mean too large?  You do know that there are also masks made for children right?

They are adults, not children.. young adults, but adults nonetheless. And I have two of the standard-issue masks since I am uniformed faculty (though I wear my own KN-95s these days)... and they're a little too small for me as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on September 29, 2021, 05:13:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 28, 2021, 04:09:02 AM
As it has been described, the virus is expected to survive among non-vaccinated and young people/children, in spite of the high vaccine rate (now 75.9 % of the total population of all ages), and spread from there.

With the vaccines in use to day, the Delta virus is able to survive among vaccinated people too. This may in the long run become the biggest problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on September 29, 2021, 05:21:38 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 28, 2021, 12:28:43 PM
I might be mistaken, but I believe that although SOME virions can surface on surfaces for up to 72 hours, the number is not considered sufficient to infect anyone after a few hours, and I think it's been demonstrated that fomites are not a significant mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Aerosols, on the other hand, are to my knowledge the single most important mode of transmission for the virus, even more important than large droplets.

Yes, you are right. It's important to add, that masks don't protect against aerosols, only against droplets. Similarly with visors. And aerosols can stay in the air for several hours in contrast to droplets, which fall to the ground within minutes. Hence the importance of ventilation, and the importance of avoiding crowded rooms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 30, 2021, 03:27:36 AM
Why is there a push for ivermectin?

"The Intercept has obtained hundreds of thousands of records from two companies, CadenceHealth.us and Ravkoo. The data indicate patients spent at least $15 million on consultations and medications combined. America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), has been spreading highly politicized misinformation about Covid-19 since the summer of 2020. AFLDS's founder, physician Simone Gold, was arrested and charged after the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6. She and other doctors have appeared in widely shared videos arguing that the drugs hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are effective treatments for Covid-19. The extremely partisan group also misleads people about Covid-19 vaccines, which they refer to as "experimental biological agents," and against public health measures like vaccine mandates, masking, social distancing, and restrictions on businesses."

"The foundation for America's Frontline Doctors was laid in a May 11, 2020, conference call between a senior staffer in Trump's reelection campaign and the Republican activist group CNP Action. They reportedly discussed finding "extremely pro-Trump" doctors to go on TV and defend Trump's plan to rapidly reopen the economy despite the more cautious safety guidance coming from the CDC. Then, on June 24 of last year, Gold started an Arizona nonprofit called the Free Speech Foundation with a million-dollar annual budget and fiscal sponsorship from the Tea Party Patriots Foundation. America's Frontline Doctors, which is a project of this nonprofit, launched on July 27, 2020."

https://theintercept.com/2021/09/28/covid-telehealth-hydroxychloroquine-ivermectin-hacked/

So, we have people taking dewormers instead of the vaccine because Trump wanted to stay in the White House.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 30, 2021, 05:22:02 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on September 30, 2021, 03:27:36 AMSo, we have people taking dewormers instead of the vaccine because Trump wanted to stay in the White House.  :-\

That's it exactly, but we've dewormed the White House.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 30, 2021, 07:33:42 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 30, 2021, 05:22:02 AM
That's it exactly, but we've dewormed the White House.

Thank goodness!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 30, 2021, 11:22:59 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 30, 2021, 05:22:02 AM
That's it exactly, but we've dewormed the White House.
;D :laugh:

I hope to God that we don't have to do a repeat--like you normally have to do with kittens in order to make sure that they are now worm-free (several applications are required I believe).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on September 30, 2021, 12:09:09 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 30, 2021, 05:22:02 AM
That's it exactly, but we've dewormed the White House.

Hah, yeah, but there are tons of worms left in Congress... ...starting from senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin. Thanks to these greedy corrupt assholes it will be hard for Biden to materially improve the lives of regular Americans and everybody knows the more disappointed the voters are at Dems, the more likely it is for the worm to return to the White House in 2025.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 01, 2021, 04:50:51 AM
Corona restrictions have been lifted or loosened in Finland. Cases will probably go up at least temporarily, but the burden to the healthcare system should stay low thanks to the protection given by vaccines. Of all Finns 73.8 % have got at least one vaccine dose and 62.2 % two doses. People older than 45 are really well vaccinated by now, but age group 20-40 should get better vaccinated. Those young adults have a mentality that Covid-19 isn't their concern, but with delta variant it is! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Artem on October 01, 2021, 06:38:52 AM
Concern in terms of passing it onto others or dying from it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 01, 2021, 06:40:47 AM
Quote from: Artem on October 01, 2021, 06:38:52 AM
Concern in terms of passing it onto others or dying from it?

Probably 2), then followed by 1) ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Artem on October 01, 2021, 06:44:27 AM
I haven't heard that there was an unusually high number of deaths in Finland among that age group.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 01, 2021, 05:49:37 PM
Covid antiviral pill halves hospitalisations and deaths, maker says
If approved, Merck's drug would be first simple oral medication shown to be effective against coronavirus (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/01/covid-antiviral-pill-halves-hospitalisations-and-deaths-maker-says)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 02, 2021, 12:10:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 01, 2021, 06:40:47 AM
Probably 2), then followed by 1) ...

If you are a fit, healthy 20-40 year old you know that unless you have an underlying medical condition then even if you get Covid you will not be adversely affected. Based on that this group is probably thinking "why get the jab, I don't need it, even if I get Covid I'll be fine." While they are correct this is a very selfish approach because they will be coming into contact with people who are far more vulnerable than them and can easily pass it on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 02, 2021, 01:06:39 AM
Quote from: Holden on October 02, 2021, 12:10:16 AM
If you are a fit, healthy 20-40 year old you know that unless you have an underlying medical condition then even if you get Covid you will not be adversely affected. Based on that this group is probably thinking "why get the jab, I don't need it, even if I get Covid I'll be fine." While they are correct this is a very selfish approach because they will be coming into contact with people who are far more vulnerable than them and can easily pass it on.

They're the group getting the virus mainly now here, and there's a possibility for long term health effects when getting the virus, besides the obvious humanism by helping to protect elderly or fragile groups that ought to be a factor.

BTW, development slightly improved here in DK, compared to the worries and prospects earlier in the week, hopefully it will hold.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 02, 2021, 02:31:57 AM
Quote from: Artem on October 01, 2021, 06:44:27 AM
I haven't heard that there was an unusually high number of deaths in Finland among that age group.

There isn't, but this is not about deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 02, 2021, 04:45:41 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on October 01, 2021, 05:49:37 PM
Covid antiviral pill halves hospitalisations and deaths, maker says
If approved, Merck's drug would be first simple oral medication shown to be effective against coronavirus (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/01/covid-antiviral-pill-halves-hospitalisations-and-deaths-maker-says)
Thank you for that link Simon.  Reading it, I'm rather sceptical as it has been tested on such a small number of people.  Fingers crossed here though.  If it does work, it could make a huge difference!

Just ran across this article this morning:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/01/politics/alabama-covid-relief-prison-bills-signed-governor-kay-ivey/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/01/politics/alabama-covid-relief-prison-bills-signed-governor-kay-ivey/index.html)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 02, 2021, 04:49:12 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on September 29, 2021, 05:13:27 AM
With the vaccines in use to day, the Delta virus is able to survive among vaccinated people too. This may in the long run become the biggest problem.

I thought this was quite interesting on what endemicity will look like -- generally I think James Ward has useful things to say

https://twitter.com/JamesWard73/status/1444234690597113859?s=20
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 02, 2021, 05:22:06 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 02, 2021, 04:49:12 AM
I thought this was quite interesting on what endemicity will look like -- generally I think James Ward has useful things to say

https://twitter.com/JamesWard73/status/1444234690597113859?s=20

My reading of that is that it shows the importance of vaccination for control. And that's potentially a real problem. I read somewhere that the history of vaccination here shows that the British tend to really want vaccines when they're scared, and be pretty disinterested in them when they're not. You can see that in rates for covid vaccine by age, and the takeup of flu and probably other things like shingles. The covid fear factor is diminishing I think, in all cohorts.

As far as NPIs are concerned, the modelling shows that they don't have a great overall impact unless they're permanent. I just think that most permanent NPIs are a no hoper in most cases, they're either too hard to enforce because no one likes them, or they're too socially damaging. Yes you could put better ventilation everywhere (but where's the cost/benefit analysis?) And yes, you could pay better sick pay (but no chance in the UK without a political opposition)


I'm hoping myself that vaccines and therapies will improve significantly, or there will be a more benign dominant virus mutation. But failing that, I think that there's a good chance vaccine passports will become a permanent feature of society -- especially given that the politicians have a real interest in increasing social surveillance and control anyway.

Brave new totalitarian capitalist world, here we come.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 03, 2021, 08:54:12 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/0XWGNct/Capture.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 03, 2021, 09:25:15 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 03, 2021, 08:54:12 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/0XWGNct/Capture.jpg)
Yes, that made the news around here---maybe a week or so ago?  Hard to keep track of time these days.  By the way, in case anyone here doesn't know, the ad campaign was created by someone else (I forget who).  That's a fake funeral home.  Wonder how many people got the point and then got the jab?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 03, 2021, 09:28:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 03, 2021, 09:25:15 AM
Yes, that made the news around here---maybe a week or so ago?  Hard to keep track of time these days.  By the way, in case anyone here doesn't know, the ad campaign was created by someone else (I forget who).  That's a fake funeral home.  Wonder how many people got the point and then got the jab?

PD

Thank you for the info. Looking closely at the picture, indeed, some traces of a possible photoshopping can perhaps be seen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 03, 2021, 02:21:15 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 03, 2021, 09:28:01 AM
Thank you for the info. Looking closely at the picture, indeed, some traces of a possible photoshopping can perhaps be seen.
MT,

No, it wasn't a case of photoshopping but more of a gimmick trying to get people to realize the implications of not getting vaccinated.  It sounds like the advertising agency was spending its own money, but I could be wrong.  You can read more about it here:  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anti-vaccine-billboard-funeral-home-truck-pro-vaccine-goes-viral-charlotte/

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 03, 2021, 06:49:26 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 03, 2021, 02:21:15 PM
MT,

No, it wasn't a case of photoshopping but more of a gimmick trying to get people to realize the implications of not getting vaccinated.  It sounds like the advertising agency was spending its own money, but I could be wrong.  You can read more about it here:  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anti-vaccine-billboard-funeral-home-truck-pro-vaccine-goes-viral-charlotte/

PD

Thank you, I get it :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 04:38:54 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 03, 2021, 09:25:15 AM
Wonder how many people got the point and then got the jab?

Doubtful.  Talking down to the unvaccinated is not going to help, it just comes across as liberal condescension.  If they don't agree with the premise of your statement, then what is done (as in this case) is just posturing for the already vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 04, 2021, 04:59:03 AM
Quote from: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 04:38:54 AM
Doubtful.  Talking down to the unvaccinated is not going to help, it just comes across as liberal condescension.  If they don't agree with the premise of your statement, then what is done (as in this case) is just posturing for the already vaccinated.
Sadly, if one just does even the briefest of googling, one can read myriad articles on how funeral homes are being overwhelmed in a number of states/areas.  :(

I did a bit more digging and apparently the "hoax" worked:  "The advert had the desired effect, Mr Hummell said, revealing that since the weekend, traffic to book a vaccine appointment on the site had seen a "significant boost".

You can read more about it here:  https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ad-shows-funeral-home-sharing-105730737.html  The above quote is from that article.  It seems that the ad agency partnered with StarMed.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 04, 2021, 07:10:19 AM
Quote from: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 04:38:54 AM
Doubtful.  Talking down to the unvaccinated is not going to help, it just comes across as liberal condescension.  If they don't agree with the premise of your statement, then what is done (as in this case) is just posturing for the already vaccinated.

This is true. Also true is that some percentage of the anti-vaxxers are not guided by reason, and therefore cannot be reasoned out of their position.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 07:26:20 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 04, 2021, 07:10:19 AM
This is true. Also true is that some percentage of the anti-vaxxers are not guided by reason, and therefore cannot be reasoned out of their position.

That is why Biden made the right call on mandating wherever he could.  They either vaccinate or remove themselves from positions where they increase the spread.  Somtimes the best thing is to take action instead of trying to persuade.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 04, 2021, 08:27:59 AM
Quote from: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 07:26:20 AM
That is why Biden made the right call on mandating wherever he could.  They either vaccinate or remove themselves from positions where they increase the spread.  Somtimes the best thing is to take action instead of trying to persuade.
It was hard to see two nurses (who had been working as nurses for many years) being interviewed (on CNN I believe?) who were refusing to get vaccinated and knowing that they would probably soon be losing their jobs though.   :( 

And no, "talking down" to the unvaccinated won't help either....and also isn't kind.  Trying to get people talking though--and hopefully thinking--is a good thing IMHO.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 04, 2021, 08:36:24 AM
Quote from: DavidW on October 04, 2021, 07:26:20 AM
That is why Biden made the right call on mandating wherever he could.  They either vaccinate or remove themselves from positions where they increase the spread.  Somtimes the best thing is to take action instead of trying to persuade.

Exactly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 04, 2021, 08:38:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 04, 2021, 08:27:59 AM
It was hard to see two nurses (who had been working as nurses for many years) being interviewed (on CNN I believe?) who were refusing to get vaccinated and knowing that they would probably soon be losing their jobs though.   :( 

And no, "talking down" to the unvaccinated won't help either....and also isn't kind.  Trying to get people talking though--and hopefully thinking--is a good thing IMHO.

PD

There's a trenchant line of Ian Anderson's on the mock concept album Thick As a Brick: "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 04, 2021, 08:52:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 04, 2021, 08:38:39 AM
There's a trenchant line of Ian Anderson's on the mock concept album Thick As a Brick: "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think."
And an even older expression:  "You can lead a horse to water....." [and you know the rest of it I'm sure].

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 04, 2021, 02:45:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/04/pfizer-covid-vaccine-protection-against-infection-tumbles-to-47percent-study-confirms.html

The effectiveness of Pfizer and BioNTech's Covid-19 vaccine against infection tumbles over several months, falling from a peak of 88% a month after receiving the two-shot series to 47% six months later, according to an observational study published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet.

While the two-dose mRNA vaccine's efficacy against infection wanes, its protection against Covid-related hospitalizations persists, remaining 90% effective for all coronavirus variants of concern — including delta — for at least six months, according to the study, which was funded by Pfizer.

The findings confirm early reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Israeli health officials that found the protection against infection falls over several months even as its effectiveness in keeping people out of the hospital held up.
...

Meanwhile, my brother is a doctor, works at a hospital in Western NY. Today, in his words:

delay getting out the hospital today because of a bunch of assholes carrying confederate flags and signs saying "Ivermectin Now!" protesting vaccine mandates.
I weep for our country!


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 04, 2021, 03:22:20 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 04, 2021, 02:45:14 PMMeanwhile, my brother is a doctor, works at a hospital in Western NY. Today, in his words:

delay getting out the hospital today because of a bunch of assholes carrying confederate flags and signs saying "Ivermectin Now!" protesting vaccine mandates.
I weep for our country!



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 07, 2021, 07:17:35 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809

Some funny stuff.
Apparently, some of the studies claiming the highest efficacy of ivermectin come from Iran and Lebanon! [Scientists are dubious on both]
So MAGAites are now looking to Iran for guidance?  :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2021, 09:21:33 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 04, 2021, 02:45:14 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/04/pfizer-covid-vaccine-protection-against-infection-tumbles-to-47percent-study-confirms.html

The effectiveness of Pfizer and BioNTech's Covid-19 vaccine against infection tumbles over several months, falling from a peak of 88% a month after receiving the two-shot series to 47% six months later, according to an observational study published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet.

While the two-dose mRNA vaccine's efficacy against infection wanes, its protection against Covid-related hospitalizations persists, remaining 90% effective for all coronavirus variants of concern — including delta — for at least six months, according to the study, which was funded by Pfizer.

The findings confirm early reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Israeli health officials that found the protection against infection falls over several months even as its effectiveness in keeping people out of the hospital held up.
...

Meanwhile, my brother is a doctor, works at a hospital in Western NY. Today, in his words:

delay getting out the hospital today because of a bunch of assholes carrying confederate flags and signs saying "Ivermectin Now!" protesting vaccine mandates.
I weep for our country!

I had read that recently re the Pfizer jabs.   :(  Have you (or anyone else here) heard more about the other vaccines and any further news about their effectiveness?

I feel for your brother.  How is he holding out energy and moral-wise?  I'm sure that this must be taking a toll on him and his own health!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 07, 2021, 11:18:02 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2021, 09:21:33 AM
I had read that recently re the Pfizer jabs.   :(  Have you (or anyone else here) heard more about the other vaccines and any further news about their effectiveness?

I feel for your brother.  How is he holding out energy and moral-wise?  I'm sure that this must be taking a toll on him and his own health!

PD

I thought that story was valuable because it more or less confirmed a fairly shocking Israeli study that surfaced months ago.
I don't intend to post a lot on COVID issues; I follow a variety of respectable news sources (mainly Bloomberg, CNBC, BBC, The Economist), and most worthwhile news should be accessible and widely disseminated.

My brother is a cardiologist, so the referenced COVID demonstrations, though depressing, are mostly nuisances for him nowadays. However, in the early (2020) months of COVID he had to work some in that area, which was definitely stressful and hazardous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 07, 2021, 11:42:02 AM
What do all these stories of vaccine denial deaths do to our sense of empathy?

By Maura Judkis

After Alexis Haug got the last raspy-voiced call from her unvaccinated, covid-stricken 51-year-old father, after he was intubated, after she had driven eight hours, alone, to Jasper, Ala., to say her final goodbye to him in the hospital, after she had him cremated and split his ashes with her stepmother and three distraught sisters — that was when she found out what people were saying about him on the Internet.

"Anti-vax — STUPID hill to die on. He died for nothing," wrote one commenter.

"They get what they deserve," wrote another.

Those were some of the milder ones.

A website called Sorry Antivaxxer, which catalogues the covid-19 deaths of people who had publicly posted their rejection of the vaccine, had found out about Haug's father, Ron Munoz. It posted his photo, along with images from his Facebook page where he had shared anti-vaccine, anti-government memes. Commenters from Sorry Antivaxxer then posted images from the Facebook profile of Munoz's widow and also left comments about vaccination on her page.

Haug's sister had sent her the site while she was on her lunch break at work last week, and she began to scroll through the unsympathetic things that strangers on the Internet were saying about her father, not yet three weeks gone.

"By the time I came back to do my job, I was bawling," she said. She had to leave work for the rest of the day. One of her younger sisters posted a comment: "This is my dad. He was a very intelligent individual and very well loved. We as a family should be able to grieve without adults harassing/bullying us during this time."

Another commenter's response took Haug's breath away. They wrote to her sister: "I can't wait to read about you on here."

For the past two months, the Internet has been a graveyard of stories about unvaccinated deaths, which make up the majority of the pandemic's current victims. News outlets, The Washington Post included, track down cautionary tales — the new mother who got to hold her baby only once, the husband and wife who died two weeks apart, the young and healthy athlete struck down in his prime, the autistic 28-year-old — and record their family's sorrow. The narrative is even more potent when the victim expresses a dying wish for others to get vaccinated, and regrets their decision not to.

"One thing that psychologists know about persuasion is that it doesn't operate through statistics and evidence. It operates through emotion. When you give people an identifiable victim, as opposed to kind of abstract aggregate statistics about harm, then that's compelling," says Piercarlo Valdesolo, a visiting associate professor at Macalester College in St. Paul, Minn., who studies moral judgment. He recalls the adage: "One death is a tragedy and a million are a statistic."

The problem is that there are now, well, not a million, but tens of thousands of deaths just like these, from the past two months alone. Because of a toxic stew of political hostility and distrust, many of the unvaccinated die unrepentant. And the vaccinated are fed up.

Compassion fatigue, one of the pandemic's buzzwords from earlier this summer, is passive: It's an exhaustion, especially among health-care workers, with the level of death and hostility, resulting in complete apathy. But a subset of the fatigued have lapsed into schadenfreude, that apt German psychological term, which is active: It's invested in another person's pain or loss as an outcome. It's the pleasure in another person's misfortune. It's sites like Sorry Antivaxxer, or the Twitter account Covidiot Deaths, or the Reddit forum called the Herman Cain Award, named for the former Republican presidential candidate who died of covid in July 2020.

These feelings were predictable and inevitable. Our political and epidemiological circumstances have created the "perfect cocktail for schadenfreude," says Valdesolo. It pops up in the presence of three conditions.

First, "it's associated with in-group/out-group psychology," he says. "When it comes to vaccination, that's a political identity. So this issue has been associated with this already vitriolic and hostile intergroup conflict."

Second, "it needs to feel like the sufferer has done something harmful and that they deserve it," Valdesolo says. "People who are vaccinated interpret the vaccine as something you do not only for yourself but to protect others, and not taking it actively harms other people. And when you've got an out-group member who is harming other people, perhaps people in your own group, now you're prone to think, 'Okay, this person deserves it.' "

And finally, "the third is the ability to have behaved otherwise or perceived the agency here. And it seems like the person who hasn't taken the vaccine could have easily done so. They had the ability to choose otherwise. And any time we think someone's got that, then we feel like they're more responsible for their bad choice."

You won't find stories of vaccine regret among the Herman Cain Awards winners. The subreddit has standards for what makes a "winner": The victim must have made public declarations against vaccination or masking (private Facebook posts do not count). The victim must have been admitted to a hospital and received a covid diagnosis. "Suffering the consequences of believing covid misinformation is not sufficient to merit a nomination/award. Propagation of covid misinformation, or public declaration of being anti-vaxx/anti mask is necessary," according to the rules. "Award is granted upon the nominee's release from their Earthly shackles." (Asked for comment, Cain's daughter, Melanie Cain Gallo, replied in an email: "I had not heard about this, and it has no effect on our family because that group is insignificant and irrelevant.")

The founder and two moderators of the Herman Cain Awards spoke to The Post on the condition that only their first names be used because they have received threats from Reddit users.

When he first discovered the subreddit, moderator Jon "felt bad that I didn't feel bad," says the 45-year-old computer programmer from San Diego. "It's like, wow, you're suffering the consequences of your actions."

But as he's spent more time on the site, scrolling through death after death, he has come to view more of the awardees as victims of misinformation. "It's hard. It hasn't jaded me. I'm more compassionate."

They do this because "we really care," says Michelle, 43, a health-care worker from Philadelphia who also serves as moderator. "We're not just dancing on graves."

The subreddit was founded last year by Bob, 53, an academic researcher who lives near Los Angeles, but it didn't attract much attention until this summer. Since then, it has grown rapidly: There are more than 350,000 members, and approximately 150 posts, most of them awardees, go up every day.

Initially, Bob says, the posts were about public figures for whom there has been no shortage of schadenfreude, including former president Donald Trump's family, which was stricken with the virus last fall. Public figures have generally been considered fair game for criticism, from Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh's diagnosis last week to "The Daily Show's" segment on the satirical "Pandemmy" awards, complete with an "In Ironic Memoriam" montage of several conservative radio hosts who died of covid this summer.

But the subreddit is more often turning its attention to the deaths of regular people on Facebook who weren't in any position of power, which has given Bob mixed feelings about his creation.

"I feel like we're punching down," he says. "I found it distasteful. But I also, at the same time, thought, 'Who am I to say what should or shouldn't be posted on this subreddit?' "

The moderators often say they look forward to the day the Herman Cain Awards no longer exist, which could happen in two ways: One is that more people get vaccinated and the country achieves herd immunity. The other is that the virus burns through the candidate pool and kills all the remaining nominees.

He has considered leaving the subreddit.

"It is a toxic environment in a lot of ways," he says. He had recently instituted some new rules — among them, banning screen images that are purely political and not related to covid — and had been shouted down by the subreddit's own subscribers, some of whom wanted the freedom to post whatever they wanted. "I spent three hours on it last night, and by the end of it, I had become toxic, and kind of a jerk in my replies to jerks, which is not typically something I would do."

The site has its share of bad apples. But many of the people who are drawn to it are hurting, too. Greg, a 54-year-old call-center worker from Indianapolis, found himself attracted to the Herman Cain Awards a year after his mother died of covid. Because she caught the virus last summer, she never had a chance to get vaccinated. Greg, who agreed to share only his first name because he fears being doxed on Reddit, has been dismayed to see people squander the chance his mother never got. He said that looking at the site felt like "therapy, in a way."

"It's a little bit dark," he says, but "it has helped me cope, in that there's still a lot of anger."

Does stewing in schadenfreude make that anger go away or does it just exacerbate it?

"That's probably a great question for a therapist," he says.

Two seemingly contradictory things can be true at the same time. The sites can be ghastly places for trolls to act their cruelest, and they can also do a little bit of good by motivating a subset of their audience to get the jab.

Last month, HCA moderator Michelle began noticing people posting pictures of their freshly minted vaccination cards, in what the subreddit's lingo has deemed "IPAs" — "Immunized to Prevent Award." People who posted them often told stories about how they were hesitant to get vaccinated but didn't want to end up as another face on the site.

"I knew as soon as I saw them, I wanted to foster and herald them and help them grow and spread vaccine awareness," she says. "It was like a silver lining on what they've been posting." As of last week, more than 64 people have attributed their vaccination to the Herman Cain Awards.

Stories about unvaccinated deaths have served a similar purpose, perhaps with even greater reach. After Danielle Peterson's husband, Chris, died of covid in late August, she and her daughters appeared in a segment on the local news in Myrtle Beach, S.C., where they live. Danielle was vaccinated because she works in health care, but Chris was not — "He's a very proud, hardheaded conservative," Danielle says.

The healthy 35-year-old had been a sports nut who never missed one of his daughters' cheer competitions. Originally from the D.C. area, he was a die-hard Capitals fan.

In the TV segment, Peterson pleaded with viewers to get vaccinated. It worked. She says hundreds of people have messaged her on Instagram to tell her they've gotten their shots.

"They'll send me their vax card and say, I'm vaccinated because of Chris. I was against the vaccine, and it's made me go get vaccinated," she says.

But those uplifting messages were interspersed with nasty ones.

"I've had people private message me on Instagram and say I'm using his story for fame," she said. After she posted a GoFundMe to request help for funeral expenses, "They were like, you wouldn't even need to be collecting money if your husband took the free vaccine, and now you're asking other people to pay for his irresponsibility."

But Chris Peterson didn't share anti-covid memes on his Facebook page. Instead, it's filled with tributes to his wife and daughters. Some photos even show him wearing a mask. Nevertheless, six weeks after his death, he appeared on the Twitter account Covidiot Deaths, which announced that it had learned via Facebook that Chris's parents, too, had succumbed to covid. Danielle Peterson confirmed their deaths, but had not been aware of the tweet until a reporter brought it to her attention. Knowing that a stranger had been monitoring her family's Facebook pages compounded her grief.

"This isn't a soap opera, this is real life," she says. "These people need to realize that some of these families' kids are affected, they have social media accounts."

Alexis Haug believes that one of her stepmother's "so-called friends" had made screen images of her father's posts and sent them to Sorry Antivaxxer. Unlike the Herman Cain Awards, the site doesn't blur out victims' names. When her sister began commenting on Sorry Antivaxxer, the site took the comments down, but later put them back online. (A man who says he is Sorry Antivaxxer's founder was willing to speak to The Post, but because he has received the same kind of threats as the Herman Cain Award moderators, he wouldn't reveal his full name to a reporter, which doesn't meet standards for quoting him anonymously.)

"I respect that these people have opinions," Haug says. "But at the same time, we literally just lost him, like not even three weeks ago. We are going through the stages right now, and some of us have small children and we're terrified to even leave the house." Because strangers have been bombarding the family's Facebook pages, Haug fears that people will look up their addresses. Sorry Antivaxxer commenters have also posted about attempts to get the family's GoFundMe taken down.

Despite her father's death, Haug says she is still undecided about getting vaccinated: "For now, I just want to grieve and be in this moment." She wants to remember Munoz as the handsome dad who coached her childhood basketball team and hosted big bonfires for all the neighborhood kids. She doesn't want to feel the way the website has made her feel.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 07, 2021, 12:59:49 PM
https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/news/126619242/australia-is-becoming-a-laughing-stock-in-the-world-of-travel

Anthony Dennis is editor of Traveller in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald in Australia.

OPINION: Aside from notching up more tests than Allan Border, one of the biggest challenges of our first overseas trips for almost two years may be trying to explain Australia's conduct during the pandemic to the people you meet along the way (let's reverse park climate change, for now, shall we?).

I experienced such a moment recently when I was invited, in my capacity as a non-travelling travel editor, to explain Australia's rather impressionistic plan to finally reopen its international borders to an overseas audience, for the World Business Report on the venerable BBC World Service.

Even if you point to Australia's death toll from Covid-19 being, along with that of New Zealand, among the lowest per capita on the planet, it can still be hard to explain to an incredulous world how our federated state and territory borders system works and doesn't.

Australia remains a fabulous destination but most other nations have decided that if you're open for tourism, it needs to mean precisely that, with as few strings attached as possible.

Australia remains a fabulous destination but most other nations have decided that if you're open for tourism, it needs to mean precisely that, with as few strings attached as possible.

You begin by explaining that the two most populous states not only closed to each other but also to five other states and territories. (Don't even try and elucidate further on Western Australia or Queensland as no radio interview spot anywhere is long enough).

It's also difficult for those overseas to fathom how tens of thousands of our fellow citizens have been unable to return to their homeland for the duration of the pandemic for the sake of the greater good. This is a great facet of the Australian character that is hard for others to understand (the odd Scandinavian, perhaps sans the Swedish, may comprehend it).


Perhaps I should have also stressed in the interview that Australia's belated border reopening is several months late due to the clumsy procurement of vaccines by our authorities. But I did manage to inject the point that this reopening is, despite the hoopla, only a partial one.

The apparent incredulity on the other end of the line in London continued when the British interviewer asked me if the border reopening announcement meant he could now visit Australia and see its considerable sights?

Well, yes, I replied. Sort of. Maybe. As long as he and any companions are fully vaccinated and are prepared to quarantine for seven days and foot the bill. Oh, and for the foreseeable future you'll likely only be able to travel within New South Wales and possibly Victoria.

Perhaps by the time he is able to visit, quarantine mandates will have been abandoned as completely unworkable. The fact is, few tourists are going to come to Australia and sacrifice a week of their lives in quarantine, especially when most people overseas receive half or even less annual leave than we antipodeans enjoy, as leaders of the tourism and aviation industries have pointed out.


Australia remains a fabulous destination but most other nations have decided that if you're open for tourism, it needs to mean precisely that, with as few strings attached as possible.

The dilemma in trying to explain Australia's Covid-19 border policies wasn't helped when, a few days later, in one of these "uh oh" moments to which we've become accustomed, our federal tourism minister declared international tourists would be able to return to Australia by December, only to be overruled by the Prime Minister who said that they wouldn't be allowed back until at least March.

That's more than four months away - there may not be much of a tourism industry left by then. Clearly, we've now returned to another "it's not a race" scenario, despite the fact that before the pandemic the total expenditure of international visitors was worth almost A$61 billion (NZ$64 billion) to the national economy, more or less the equivalent of coal. It also employs as many as 30 times more Australians as the coal industry, and a good many of them in regional areas.

Tourism-generating major events, and Australia's ability to run them, is another area of concern. It looks like the Ashes series will go ahead over summer following tense and protracted negotiations between England and Australia teams and doubt remains around the Australian Open tennis early next year.

Already the England netball team abandoned a tour to Australia, largely due to the requirement to quarantine even if fully-vaccinated. And few, if any, top-ranked overseas tennis players will be prepared to quarantine a second year in a row (some also refuse to be vaccinated), especially when so many heavily-vaccinated countries have already opened up in an attempt to put Covid behind them. (The approaching Northern Hemisphere winter may prove to be the first big test of these strategies).

Australian Open tennis organisers in Melbourne will fight hard to stage the event, amid speculation that the Chinese have been coveting a grand slam tournament of their own for years.
No wonder the bruised, battered and barely upright tourism industry, particularly international airlines, are confused and frustrated by the lack of a transparent plan. It doesn't help that, when compared to, say, the coal equivalent, tourism is a fragmented industry without a proper united voice. Even now it struggles to be taken truly seriously in political and media circles.

Australia used to be a country that worried too much about what the rest of the world thought of it. Now we tend to be too little concerned about the wellbeing of our international image across not only tourism but a spectrum of issues.

We may well end up having the last laugh on the world in Covid terms, but meanwhile we risk becoming the laughing stock of world travel until we get our tourism story straight. The world to which we reach out for visitor dollars will move right on without us - that's if it hasn't done so already.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 07, 2021, 01:12:01 PM
A simple map showing the current vaccine status around the globe, country-wise (sorry, NZ and Eastern Australia...).
.
There's a long way to go.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2021, 03:13:50 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 07, 2021, 11:18:02 AM
I thought that story was valuable because it more or less confirmed a fairly shocking Israeli study that surfaced months ago.
I don't intend to post a lot on COVID issues; I follow a variety of respectable news sources (mainly Bloomberg, CNBC, BBC, The Economist), and most worthwhile news should be accessible and widely disseminated.

My brother is a cardiologist, so the referenced COVID demonstrations, though depressing, are mostly nuisances for him nowadays. However, in the early (2020) months of COVID he had to work some in that area, which was definitely stressful and hazardous.
Hi T.D.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be dismissive of your story/news re Pfizer and apologize if it came across that way; I certainly didn't mean to sound like that.

Glad that he's not in the front lines though I suspect that things still aren't easy even though he's a specialist.  What happens, for example, if someone comes in needing emergency surgery and they test positive?  One can do the best possible in terms of precautions, but wonder if they have the Delta variant or some other one?  I would think that it would still be stressful at least at times?

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 07, 2021, 03:54:27 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2021, 03:13:50 PM
Hi T.D.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be dismissive of your story/news re Pfizer and apologize if it came across that way; I certainly didn't mean to sound like that.

Glad that he's not in the front lines though I suspect that things still aren't easy even though he's a specialist.  What happens, for example, if someone comes in needing emergency surgery and they test positive?  One can do the best possible in terms of precautions, but wonder if they have the Delta variant or some other one?  I would think that it would still be stressful at least at times?

PD

I didn't think you were being dismissive. Just trying to minimize my posting on non-music threads.
I don't know the COVID protocol at my brother's hospital, don't want to stir up worry by asking questions. I imagine it's stressful, but he's well-informed and takes all reasonable precautions. Haven't asked whether he's getting a booster, but I assume so; he qualifies per state guidelines so may already have received it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 10, 2021, 02:33:09 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBUvlokXIAQ_OqT?format=jpg&name=900x900)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 11, 2021, 02:37:05 PM
Opinion: Florida teachers are quitting their jobs in droves — and who can blame them?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 12, 2021, 12:41:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 11, 2021, 02:37:05 PM
Opinion: Florida teachers are quitting their jobs in droves — and who can blame them?

I can't read the article - how many is "in droves"?

In some parts of France they've done a strange thing with masks in schools. The kids don't wear one but the grown ups do. Can anyone see the reasoning behind that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 12, 2021, 12:47:37 AM
1) Interesting tests will now begin here in DK, with a Danish-Norwegian medicine product:

a small spray with some mild, quasi-acid substance that you use in your mouth. Allegedly it neutralizes Covid infections within just 15 seconds, as shown during testing with pigs, and it is useful for other throat/lung infections, just having a cold etc.. You'd be able to carry a spray with you, for everyday use, like we use disinfections now. Now, as to the content of the spray, I don't know ...
(source, in Danish https://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE13359079/inhalering-af-mild-syreblanding-skal-behandle-covid19-og-andre-luftvejsinfektioner/ )

2) reports that the quickly introduced, Russian 'Sputnik' vaccine was the result of an insider spying at the Astra Zeneca work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 12, 2021, 01:36:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 12, 2021, 12:47:37 AM
1) Interesting tests will now begin here in DK, with a Danish-Norwegian medicine product:

a small spray with some mild, quasi-acid substance that you use in your mouth. Allegedly it neutralizes Covid infections within just 15 seconds, as shown during testing with pigs, and it is useful for other throat/lung infections, just having a cold etc.. You'd be able to carry a spray with you, for everyday use, like we use disinfections now. Now, as to the content of the spray, I don't know ...
(source, in Danish https://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE13359079/inhalering-af-mild-syreblanding-skal-behandle-covid19-og-andre-luftvejsinfektioner/ )

2) reports that the quickly introduced, Russian 'Sputnik' vaccine was the result of an insider spying at the Astra Zeneca work.

1) Interesting.

2) Don't know if these reports are true, but why am I not surprised? That said, patents have been protected better than lives in this pandemic...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 12, 2021, 02:01:00 AM
What will flu do?

https://twitter.com/MarionKoopmans/status/1447820777261342722?s=20
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 12, 2021, 08:41:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 12, 2021, 12:41:32 AM
I can't read the article - how many is "in droves"?

Quote from: Lizette AlvarezTeachers are quitting their jobs in droves, particularly younger ones, and who can blame them? As of July, 2,137 teachers have left the Orlando-area Orange County school system, either by resigning or retiring, Wendy L. Doromal, the president of the county's Classroom Teachers Association, told me, adding that another 493 teachers told a recent survey they are currently thinking of leaving or retiring.

"It's more than we have had previously, and it just keeps going and going," Doromal said.

Statewide, there were 5,000 teachers and 3,700 support-staff vacancies in early August. There is also a major substitute teacher crisis, not to mention an intense shortage of bus drivers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 12, 2021, 09:08:45 AM
More news from the Death Cult Belt:
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott bans coronavirus vaccine mandates, including for private businesses
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 12, 2021, 10:22:50 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 12, 2021, 08:41:27 AM


Thanks. When I googled it, although I couldn't read the article, I could see this photo, so I just assumed that they we're leaving because they felt strongly, rightly or wrongly, that masks are inappropriate in schools

(https://www.mondialnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Florida-teachers-are-quitting-their-jobs-in-droves-%E2%80%94-and.jpg&w=1024&op=resize&opt=1&filter=antialias&t=20170517.jpeg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on October 12, 2021, 02:21:54 PM
In South Carolina there has been a major teacher shortage (this is in reply to the posts about Florida).  There already was one pre-covid, but 2020 saw a great deal more vacancies and early retirements because teachers didn't feel supported by administration, and it certainly didn't help that the state government froze salaries.  There is also a major shortage on bus drivers as well.  This year all teachers have received a significant bump to their salaries but it might be to little to late.  Parents, administration and lawmakers seemed to not realize that if they didn't support teachers then they would just leave or retire.  This is not a rant, my school is special and supports me completely unlike the reality of the average public school teacher.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 12, 2021, 03:40:56 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 12, 2021, 09:08:45 AM
More news from the Death Cult Belt:
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott bans coronavirus vaccine mandates, including for private businesses

Abbott's challenger is a nutjob anti-vaxxer. He has to show the crazy voters he can be a nutjob too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on October 13, 2021, 05:31:03 AM
Just had my flu jab. No mention yet of the booster Covid jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 13, 2021, 10:24:17 AM
Survey: Three-quarters of Mass. residents support universal vaccine mandate

And:

Boston puts 812 workers from five city agencies on unpaid leave for failing to get vaccinated
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 13, 2021, 10:55:05 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 13, 2021, 10:24:17 AM
Survey: Three-quarters of Mass. residents support universal vaccine mandate

And:

Boston puts 812 workers from five city agencies on unpaid leave for failing to get vaccinated

Unpaid leave for unvaccinated health workers was to start October 15 here in Quebec. It has been pushed 30 days because over 7000 are still unvaccinated and the burden of filling their positions would have fallen on the vaccinated health workers.

OTOH, as of October 15 these unvaxxed health workers will be denied the « Covid premium » they have enjoyed so far, which only makes sense: why give a Covid premium to people who purposely  slow down the eradication process  ??? . Also, they won't get the 15000$ raise the other nurses will be getting as of November 1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 14, 2021, 05:19:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 13, 2021, 10:24:17 AM
Survey: Three-quarters of Mass. residents support universal vaccine mandate

And:

Boston puts 812 workers from five city agencies on unpaid leave for failing to get vaccinated
[/b]I know that it's probably for the best, but still...youch!  :(

Quote from: André on October 13, 2021, 10:55:05 AM
Unpaid leave for unvaccinated health workers was to start October 15 here in Quebec. It has been pushed 30 days because over 7000 are still unvaccinated and the burden of filling their positions would have fallen on the vaccinated health workers.

OTOH, as of October 15 these unvaxxed health workers will be denied the « Covid premium » they have enjoyed so far, which only makes sense: why give a Covid premium to people who purposely  slow down the eradication process  ??? . Also, they won't get the 15000$ raise the other nurses will be getting as of November 1.
Over 7,000?!  Wow!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 14, 2021, 11:48:18 AM
Further impacts from the pandemic--that and attempts to deal with it by getting away into Mother Nature, but not caring enough to pick up after themselves:  food, rubbish, tents(!), sleeping bags(!) and the remnants of a romantic tea for two (including, table, chairs, glasses, etc.)!

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cumbria-58911256

and:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cumbria-53798298

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 14, 2021, 12:54:44 PM
That's a pity, the problems have obviously been accentuated by people going to the countryside in larger numbers, though the first case has a bit of art-like happening to it.
I remember how for example the smaller Scottish islands actively worked against tourist/escaper's visits much earlier during the pandemic, fearing they'd bring the virus with them, but also for fear of over-population, local food and supply shortage, etc. On the Isle of Skye, many had become tired of the annual tourist invasions nd its effects to the natural surroundings even before that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 15, 2021, 04:59:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 14, 2021, 12:54:44 PM
That's a pity, the problems have obviously been accentuated by people going to the countryside in larger numbers, though the first case has a bit of art-like happening to it.
I remember how for example the smaller Scottish islands actively worked against tourist/escaper's visits much earlier during the pandemic, fearing they'd bring the virus with them, but also for fear of over-population, local food and supply shortage, etc. On the Isle of Skye, many had become tired of the annual tourist invasions nd its effects to the natural surroundings even before that.
The person who ran across the teatime setup thought that at first it was some kind of art installation and checked around with local places; no one had catered it and he said that the nearest road was half a mile away.  A lot of trouble to bring all of that stuff out there and then just leave it all.  I suspect that they also hadn't been long gone or the animals would have wrecked havoc on the table top.  Can't believe that they would leave all of those glasses there to get knocked over, broken and then litter the wood's floor!  The photographer ended up guessing that they were from the Instagram-age.   :(

And, yes, I too remember reading some stores on the BBC about a number of concerns such as the ones that you had listed.

Hope that someone came back to clean up their mess, but I suspect not and that it was left to others to deal with it.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on October 15, 2021, 05:29:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 14, 2021, 11:48:18 AM
Further impacts from the pandemic--that and attempts to deal with it by getting away into Mother Nature, but not caring enough to pick up after themselves:  food, rubbish, tents(!), sleeping bags(!) and the remnants of a romantic tea for two (including, table, chairs, glasses, etc.)!

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cumbria-58911256

and:  https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cumbria-53798298

PD
The teatime setup is clearly from the same day, a strange sight but hardly a sign of neglect if they went for a walk while the person who took a picture of the scene and complained about kids these days stumbled onto the scene.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 15, 2021, 09:51:08 AM
Corona passport comes into effect in Finland when this Friday is over and is in effect at least until the end of this year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 15, 2021, 02:03:22 PM
COVID is shaving years off life expectancy in sun belt, great plains

By Jonathan Levin Bloomberg,
Updated October 15, 2021, 12:10 p.m.

Covid-19 has cut more than two years from life expectancy in 16 U.S. states in the past year, with the worst damage concentrated in the Sun Belt and the Great Plains.

In Texas, Covid-19 caused an implied reduction in life expectancy at birth of 2.6 years to 76.4 in the twelve months ending in September, according to an analysis of death statistics from University of California at Los Angeles sociology professor Patrick Heuveline, an update of data originally published in the BMJ Open journal.

In Arizona, the reduction was 2.6 years to 77.2 and in South Dakota, 2.5 years to 76.8. That's a dramatic shift from the first year of the pandemic, when Northeast states topped the list.

Covid-19 has been consistently among the leading causes of death in the U.S., but the widely-used deaths per capita metric can sometimes lead to misleading conclusions, because it fails to consider the effect population age has on outcomes. The virus is many orders of magnitude more deadly for the elderly as opposed to the young, but Heuveline's data takes age and gender into account to make comparisons possible.

Nationwide, Covid cut life expectancy by 1.5 years to 78.7 in the twelve months ended Sept. 30, according to Heuveline's data.

Covid-19 has caused more than 721,000 deaths in the U.S., more than any other pandemic, and the highest toll of any country.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 17, 2021, 03:43:13 PM
So, my sister is making her own hydroxochloroquine to take as a "preventative" against COVID-19. She told me her process which just involves grapefruit and lemons, so I doubt she'll do herself any mischief, and she'll take in Vitamin C. She also thinks that Ivermectin is a good treatment. I asked her just who claims so, and she directed me to "America's Frontline Doctors"

Subsequently I found this (https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 17, 2021, 04:23:31 PM
Very sad to hear this, Karl. "America's Frontline Doctors" have been in the news for some months as one of the biggest purveyors of medical misinformation about COVID-19.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 17, 2021, 04:27:53 PM
Quote from: krummholz on October 17, 2021, 04:23:31 PM
Very sad to hear this, Karl. "America's Frontline Doctors" have been in the news for some months as one of the biggest purveyors of medical misinformation about COVID-19.

My dear sister, unfortunately, is a die-hard Trumpkin, which "pairs well" with her appetite for conspiracy theory. I'll try to get through, but I don't know if it's possible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 01:59:11 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 17, 2021, 03:43:13 PM
So, my sister is making her own hydroxochloroquine to take as a "preventative" against COVID-19. She told me her process which just involves grapefruit and lemons, so I doubt she'll do herself any mischief, and she'll take in Vitamin C. She also thinks that Ivermectin is a good treatment. I asked her just who claims so, and she directed me to "America's Frontline Doctors"

Subsequently I found this (https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors).

Auts!  :-\ I am lucky to have a smart sister immune to blatant misinformation and able to do critical thinking. My sister has lost a few of her friends during this pandemic, because those friends of hers fell for the propaganda becaming anti-vaxxers and don't want to speak with my sister (pro-vaccines) anymore. Crazy. This planet is becoming a hell for rational people because there is so much crazy stuff everywhere.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 03:16:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 17, 2021, 04:27:53 PM
My dear sister, unfortunately, is a die-hard Trumpkin, which "pairs well" with her appetite for conspiracy theory. I'll try to get through, but I don't know if it's possible.

Sorry about this Karl. So many families in the US are victims of this cultural division. Getting through with Trumpists is very difficult. The most important thing is to be respectable and concentrate on encouraging these people to think themselves, get them to question some of their own believes.

This cultural war between "right" and "left" is beneficial to the top 1 % because it hides the fact the real war is class war between the bottom 99 % and the top 1 %.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 18, 2021, 03:29:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 17, 2021, 03:43:13 PM
So, my sister is making her own hydroxochloroquine to take as a "preventative" against COVID-19. She told me her process which just involves grapefruit and lemons, so I doubt she'll do herself any mischief, and she'll take in Vitamin C. She also thinks that Ivermectin is a good treatment. I asked her just who claims so, and she directed me to "America's Frontline Doctors"

Subsequently I found this (https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors).
I'm very sorry to hear this Karl.   :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 18, 2021, 04:56:03 AM
Zoos are starting to vaccinate their great apes and big cats against Covid-19 with a new vaccine created especially for animals by animal health company Zoetis.  At the St. Louis zoo, "About 35 mammals at the zoo have received their first dose, including several other chimps, some orangutans, lemurs, foxes and most of the zoo's big cats.

"Our great apes and our big cats were our highest-priority animals," Chinnadurai said. "So far everyone has bounced back very well from the injection."

The great apes and big cats were a high priority because they can contract the same viruses that plague people.

"There are a number of upper respiratory diseases that we could transmit to an ape or an ape could potentially transmit to a person," Chinnadurai said. "It's a little less common for us to see this type of disease transmission go from a human to something like a big cat, but it's still definitely possible."

The vaccine, developed by the animal health company Zoetis, has not received full approval by the Food and Drug Administration, though the U.S. Department of Agriculture has authorized it for experimental use on a case-by-case basis."

https://news.stlpublicradio.org/show/st-louis-on-the-air/2021-10-06/why-jimiyu-and-orangutans-and-big-cats-too-are-getting-covid-19-shots

And if you scroll down a bit, you can see the orangutans getting their shots at the National Zoo (They are rewarded with a treat of honey afterwards):  https://twitter.com/NationalZoo

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 18, 2021, 05:12:36 AM
That's interesting, hadn't heard about that, but Finland is starting to vaccinate their mink population now.

A very good, humorous clip with the orangutangs, communicating with hand signs!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 18, 2021, 05:25:15 AM
Thanks, all. I have two other sisters, one Trumpist (but she is sensible about vaccines) the other not. I have been estranged from a brother over Trump. Part of you wants to try to discuss things like rational adults, but no one benefits if you're knocking your noggin against a wall.

And: Junk Science is King in Florida

Miami school says vaccinated students must stay home for 30 days to protect others, citing discredited info
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 05:45:04 AM
Colin Powell dead of Corona according to the news.

Quote from: MusicTurner on October 18, 2021, 05:12:36 AM
Finland is starting to vaccinate their mink population now.

I haven't heard about that...  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 18, 2021, 05:51:11 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 05:45:04 AM
(...)

I haven't heard about that...  :P

It's a noted story here, because the culling of the entire Danish mink population is still a subject for discussion and even court proceedings.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 18, 2021, 06:23:30 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 12, 2021, 12:47:37 AM
(...)

2) reports that the quickly introduced, Russian 'Sputnik' vaccine was the result of an insider spying at the Astra Zeneca work.

This story seems to have been retracted:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1504646/correction-russia-copied-AstraZeneca-Sputnik-jab
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 18, 2021, 07:37:11 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 05:45:04 AM
Colin Powell dead of Corona according to the news.

The scary part of his passing was the fact that he was fully vaccinated. :-\ But he was being treated for Multiple myeloma, which I'm sure weakened his immune system, so this didn't exactly help when he got COVID.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 18, 2021, 07:44:24 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 18, 2021, 07:37:11 AM
The scary part of his passing was the fact that he was fully vaccinated. :-\

You must start to expect vaccine waning to be increasingly significant after six months -- that is what was shown in Israel and the UK, the first countries to vaccinate on a large scale and hence the first countries to experience waning on an important scale.

I believe one consequence to draw is that once vaccine passports have been introduced, they will be hard to take away, because governments say they will need to continue to incentivise people to take booster jabs. Only a new generation of very long lasting vaccines will enable people to argue against permanent diminution of the civil liberties which were in place in 2019. I haven't heard that such vaccines are in the pipeline. And of course Governments, and companies like Cambridge Analytica, may have their own, non health related,  reasons to keep these population wide surveillance and control tools in place.

All these consequences of the epidemic, I for one had no idea in March 2020 that it would lead to these political consequences. Though it's not surprising in hindsight.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 18, 2021, 07:47:19 AM
 - 3rd, updated jab has begun in some countries, including mine, where I might get one in early January or so.

The corona passport has been abolished in my country, but is needed for travels abroad.

- EU closer to recommending and acknowledging vaccines for children aged 5-11, the story goes today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 18, 2021, 08:34:36 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 18, 2021, 07:44:24 AM
You must start to expect vaccine waning to be increasingly significant after six months -- that is what was shown in Israel and the UK, the first countries to vaccinate on a large scale and hence the first countries to experience waning on an important scale.

That's true, but in Powell's case, it was more likely immune suppression that did him in, rather than vaccine waning. Multiple myeloma is a form of cancer for which, as I understand it, patients are given medications that have immune suppression as a side effect. With a weak immune system, one is both extra-vulnerable to pathogens like this virus, and also vaccines have less effect in the first place.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 08:46:11 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 18, 2021, 07:37:11 AM
The scary part of his passing was the fact that he was fully vaccinated. :-\ But he was being treated for Multiple myeloma, which I'm sure weakened his immune system, so this didn't exactly help when he got COVID.

The vaccines don't make anyone immortal. They reduce the risk of dying from Covid (by factor of seven I believe). In his case that kind of reduction in the risk just wasn't enough to save him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 19, 2021, 06:13:52 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 18, 2021, 05:25:15 AM

And: Junk Science is King in Florida

Miami school says vaccinated students must stay home for 30 days to protect others, citing discredited info
Good Lord!!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 19, 2021, 10:30:32 AM
Romania reported a record 18,863 new coronavirus cases Tuesday, including 273 patients who had been reinfected, as the country trailed in vaccination numbers.

It also recorded 574 deaths, marking the first time that Romania had tallied more than 500 deaths in one day.

In a statement Tuesday, the World Health Organization suggested that the country's low vaccination rate — the second-lowest in the European Union after Bulgaria — needed to be addressed and that it would send a senior expert to the country for consultation.

"An urgent priority is to boost vaccination among vulnerable groups, reduce the risk of hospitalization and death, and relieve pressure on the health system," Heather Papowitz, WHO director for medical crises, natural disasters and conflicts, said in the statement.

Papowitz will visit the country for at least 60 days to advise on the crisis, Romanian media reported.

Only around a third of Romania's population has been fully vaccinated. On Tuesday, the government said that of the 574 patients who had died, 527 had not been vaccinated. Of the 46 who died and had been vaccinated, 43 had co-morbidities.

Despite Romania's low rate of vaccination, the government began to offer doses that were near expiration for sale to other nations this summer, citing lagging domestic demand. Officials blamed the rural population in much of the country, as well as persistent vaccine hesitancy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 19, 2021, 10:35:04 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 08:46:11 AM
The vaccines don't make anyone immortal. They reduce the risk of dying from Covid (by factor of seven I believe). In his case that kind of reduction in the risk just wasn't enough to save him.

Obviously, but my point isn't about the vaccine but rather that he already had a weakened immune system.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on October 19, 2021, 11:12:50 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 18, 2021, 05:25:15 AM
And: Junk Science is King in Florida

Miami school says vaccinated students must stay home for 30 days to protect others, citing discredited info

It's a very strange world we live in. Where even with black and white or night and day, we argue over who is right. Common sense and facts seem a secondary consideration.  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on October 19, 2021, 12:26:00 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 18, 2021, 03:16:53 AM
This cultural war between "right" and "left" is beneficial to the top 1 % because it hides the fact the real war is class war between the bottom 99 % and the top 1 %.
Sums it up 100%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 19, 2021, 01:05:12 PM
Quote from: greg on October 19, 2021, 12:26:00 PM
Sums it up 100%.

Hah, it does.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 19, 2021, 01:58:03 PM
Quote from: OrchestralNut on October 19, 2021, 11:12:50 AM
It's a very strange world we live in. Where even with black and white or night and day, we argue over who is right. Common sense and facts seem a secondary consideration.  :(

The simple way to look at it is to go by the raw data only and ignore any media commentary. That way you have an accurate set of facts and can make your mind up one way or the other. For example - let's take the Covid mortality figures from the US which has one of the supposedly 'worst' records in dealing with the pandemic. I'v

Total cases circa 45,000,000
Total deaths circa 727,000
Percentage of deaths per case = .016%

I would have 16 chances out of 10,000 of dying from Covid if I contracted it. If we put those figures as a percentage of the total US population the figures are minuscule.

Does this change my perspective? It certainly does. I look at figures like that and know that my chances of dying from coronavirus if I catch it are very slim. The fear factor generated by the media is gone (for me) and while I still wouldn't like to get it I'm not too worried if I do. (I actually believe that I had the virus in late January 2020 - long story)

From the beginning, the figures reported should have revolved around deaths and serious illness but our media couldn't pass up the chance to spout bad news about rising cases without qualifying the data. Data like what percentage of cases were asymptomatic or very mild to those where hospitalisation took place all the way up to deaths. I believe that this lack of reporting has influenced our governments decision making process and not in a good way and this pandemic has exposed the way our media manipulates the news to its own ends. I will never trust the media again!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 02:35:16 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 19, 2021, 01:58:03 PM
Total cases circa 45,000,000
Total deaths circa 727,000
Percentage of deaths per case = .016%

Check your math.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 19, 2021, 03:18:29 PM
Quote from: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 02:35:16 PM
Check your math.
:laugh: 🤣

MAGAmatics!

Hey, the stated figure was only off by 2 orders of mag(A)nitude! 🤣
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 19, 2021, 03:36:34 PM
Quote from: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 02:35:16 PM
Check your math.

1.62 %  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 19, 2021, 03:40:53 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 19, 2021, 03:36:34 PM
1.62 %  ;)

My impression is that this figure has always been pretty slim.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 19, 2021, 03:43:11 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 19, 2021, 03:36:34 PM
1.62 %  ;)

And if you stratify by age group...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 04:09:29 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 19, 2021, 03:43:11 PM
And if you stratify by age group...

Good point.  And there are also the reported long term effects.  It was the report of lingering cognitive effects that had me scheduling my vaccination for the earliest opportunity.  I just can't afford to lose more cognitive ability than I already have.  I've got my Pfizer booster shot scheduled in a couple weeks.

The total death count is almost certainly an undercount as well.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 19, 2021, 04:19:18 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 19, 2021, 01:58:03 PM
The simple way to look at it is to go by the raw data only and ignore any media commentary. That way you have an accurate set of facts and can make your mind up one way or the other. For example - let's take the Covid mortality figures from the US which has one of the supposedly 'worst' records in dealing with the pandemic. I'v

Total cases circa 45,000,000
Total deaths circa 727,000
Percentage of deaths per case = .016%


Selective and confirmation-driven use of "raw data" creates exactly the skewed  "commentary" you claim to be wanting to avoid, which most good commentators would bring to your attention.

There is considerably more data you need to be aware of before you can so blithely brush off the pandemic as mere fearmongering and that you personally (never mid the people you infect or the overwhelmed healthcare systems) are safe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on October 19, 2021, 05:08:00 PM
Quote from: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 04:09:29 PM
The total death count is almost certainly an undercount as well.   
As per https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend (https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend), total excess deaths in the USA attributable to SARS-CoV-2 are about 840,000 as of the present moment. Most of the undercount occurred in the first few months of the pandemic. (e.g. New York eventually acknowledged an additional 12,000 unreported deaths this year, most of which occurred in March-May 2020.)

Not counted are additional excess deaths from other causes due to widespread structural failures of healthcare systems across the world. For example, overcrowding of emergency rooms and ICUs has led to things like cancer patients dying while awaiting treatment, patients in ambulances dying during excessively long handover periods (as long as 11 hours in one UK hospital), etc. As such, almost anyone who has needed medical care—particularly emergency or intensive care—within the last year and a half has been affected in some way by the pandemic, leading to further excess deaths; it's not merely the people who died or became seriously ill as a result of direct infection with the virus. All-cause excess mortality can be seen to have spiked in almost every country at various times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on October 19, 2021, 06:26:39 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 19, 2021, 01:58:03 PM
The simple way to look at it is to go by the raw data only and ignore any media commentary. That way you have an accurate set of facts and can make your mind up one way or the other. For example - let's take the Covid mortality figures from the US which has one of the supposedly 'worst' records in dealing with the pandemic. I'v

Total cases circa 45,000,000
Total deaths circa 727,000
Percentage of deaths per case = .016%

I would have 16 chances out of 10,000 of dying from Covid if I contracted it. If we put those figures as a percentage of the total US population the figures are minuscule.


As was pointed out, you calculated the fraction, not the percentage. A fraction of 0.016 is 16 deaths per 1,000. And by the way, 0.016% (which is incorrect) would have been 16 deaths per 100,000, not 16 deaths per 10,000.

Maybe you should leave the calculations to the epidemiologists. :)

Quote from: amw on October 19, 2021, 05:08:00 PM
As per https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend (https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend), total excess deaths in the USA attributable to SARS-CoV-2 are about 840,000 as of the present moment. ...

I think deaths are undercounted but cases are undercounted more. There are many asymptomatic cases or cases with very mild symptoms for which the person never was tested. The number that the epidemiologists have consistently come up with is 0.7% fatality (in advanced countries), doing their best the account for biases in data collection. I tend to believe that number. That means if you contract covid-19 your chance of dying is 1 in 140. Probably the more deadly variants are tending to push that up and more effective treatments are pushing it down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 19, 2021, 07:08:21 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 19, 2021, 01:58:03 PM
Total cases circa 45,000,000
Total deaths circa 727,000
Percentage of deaths per case = .016%

That's .016 or 1.6%, not .016%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 20, 2021, 12:24:28 AM
Quote from: Daverz on October 19, 2021, 02:35:16 PM
Check your math.

I knew that was going to come up and am happy to be corrected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 20, 2021, 04:49:44 AM
Quote from: Holden on October 20, 2021, 12:24:28 AM
I knew that was going to come up and am happy to be corrected.

Having a basic understanding of math/numbers such as percentages is one aspect of (scientific) literacy. It is important to be able to put things in perspective, understanding the scale of things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 20, 2021, 06:00:11 AM
Cases finally going up here in DK, passing the 1000/daily mark, with experts maintaining prospects of 4000/daily around Christmas as a culmination and maybe 200 hospitalizations, but they're still saying that the sickness will be much less fatal and serious than in the earlier stages of the pandemic. Masks might be re-introduced, for example in schools.

For unvaccinated, they say it's a choice only between getting the infection at some time in the nearer future, with related risks, or getting the vaccine, with less risks.
85% of people older than 12 years, and 76.2 % of the total population, have had their vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 20, 2021, 07:37:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 20, 2021, 06:00:11 AM
Cases finally going up here in DK, passing the 1000/daily mark, with experts maintaining prospects of 4000/daily around Christmas as a culmination and maybe 200 hospitalizations, but they're still saying that the sickness will be much less fatal and serious than in the earlier stages of the pandemic. Masks might be re-introduced, for example in schools.

For unvaccinated, they say it's a choice only between getting the infection at some time in the nearer future, with related risks, or getting the vaccine, with less risks.
85% of people older than 12 years, and 76.2 % of the total population, have had their vaccines.

Since Denmark and Finland are very similar size countries, comparing the numbers is pretty easy:

In Finland we have on average about 750 cases/day at the moment. In hospitals we have 208 covid patients of which 30+ are in intensive care. 77 % of patients in hospitals are unvaccinated. At this point we have 1133 corona deaths.

Twice vaccinated: 76 % of people older than 12 and 67 % of the whole population. Vaccine hesitancy has been stronger than expected. Especially young adults and immigrants have been lazy taking the vaccine. One theory for this laziness is that this pandemic has been relatively easy in Finland (mild restrictions) and it hasn't caused as much damage as in many other countries such as Italy and that's why younger adults don't take this seriously. Corona passport was introduced last Saturday and it might increase the interest of getting the vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2021, 10:04:36 AM
Judge dismisses request to stop NH school mask mandates; Vermont to add beds to relieve pressure on hospitals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on October 20, 2021, 10:18:49 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 20, 2021, 07:37:16 AM
Since Denmark and Finland are very similar size countries, comparing the numbers is pretty easy:

In Finland we have on average about 750 cases/day at the moment. In hospitals we have 208 covid patients of which 30+ are in intensive care. 77 % of patients in hospitals are unvaccinated. At this point we have 1133 corona deaths.

Twice vaccinated: 76 % of people older than 12 and 67 % of the whole population. Vaccine hesitancy has been stronger than expected. Especially young adults and immigrants have been lazy taking the vaccine. One theory for this laziness is that this pandemic has been relatively easy in Finland (mild restrictions) and it hasn't caused as much damage as in many other countries such as Italy and that's why younger adults don't take this seriously. Corona passport was introduced last Saturday and it might increase the interest of getting the vaccines.
608 new cases today in Norway, also of the same size. 69% of the whole population fully vaccinated. I'm thinking as you. 893 detahs in all, mainly older people, mainly from before vaccinations started to have effect. Quite a few with one dose seem to neglect to take the second.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on October 20, 2021, 11:27:46 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 20, 2021, 10:04:36 AM
Judge dismisses request to stop NH school mask mandates; Vermont to add beds to relieve pressure on hospitals.

On paper, beds are easy to add. The difficulty lies in finding the nurses to go with them. One intensive care bed = 1 full time nurse. Nurses in Canada are overworked and difficult to lure into the hospital network (all hospitals are public here). Private sector clinics offer much better conditions, but do not tend to Covid patients.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 20, 2021, 12:00:53 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/4FVnDBp/Capture.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on October 20, 2021, 02:58:24 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 20, 2021, 12:00:53 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/4FVnDBp/Capture.jpg)

Is this the UK Covid triumph made possible by early vaccinations and not being part of the EU?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 20, 2021, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: Que on October 20, 2021, 02:58:24 PM
Is this the UK Covid triumph made possible by early vaccinations and not being part of the EU?  ::)

In my opinion their aim is to ensure that the public health service, the NHS, fails in some obvious way. They will then sell off large parts of it, saying that it will perform better in the private sector. And they will make large amounts of money for themselves and their friends and sponsors in the process.

This is what happens in parliamentary capitalism. The governing party, the Tories, are the puppets of the banks: they are in power because of their support and and they need that support to continue to be in power.  There is effectively no opposition here because there is practically no independent mainstream media, they are all more or less controlled by the forces of global capital. They are now talking about significant restrictions of internet based media, using the recent assassination of an MP as an excuse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 20, 2021, 11:45:24 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 20, 2021, 07:31:19 PM
In my opinion their aim is to ensure that the public health service, the NHS, fails in some obvious way. They will then sell off large parts of it, saying that it will perform better in the private sector. And they will make large amounts of money for themselves and their friends and sponsors in the process.

This is what happens in parliamentary capitalism. The governing party, the Tories, are the puppets of the banks: they are in power because of their support and and they need that support to continue to be in power.  There is effectively no opposition here because there is practically no independent mainstream media, they are all more or less controlled by the forces of global capital. They are now talking about significant restrictions of internet based media, using the recent assassination of an MP as an excuse.

Agreed totally.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 21, 2021, 12:08:44 AM
Yet, 1) in the UK the 'forces of capital' should then mean the ignoring of medical advise and the loosening of restrictions, cf. also very recent appeals from the health sector, that Johnson has chosen to overlook, whereas 2) in Australia, the same "forces of capital' should then mean the maintaining of too many restrictions, and creating unnecessary panic via the press ... ? Seems self-contradictory to me.

EDIT: the only way to reconcile the two would be to think of it phase-wise, that Australia is in a different, earlier phase than the UK. But you still see different behaviours from different governments, when confronted with the various problems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 21, 2021, 12:19:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 21, 2021, 12:08:44 AM
Yet, 1) in the UK the 'forces of capital' should then mean the ignoring of medical advise and the loosening of restrictions, cf. also very recent appeals from the health sector, that Johnson has chosen to overlook,

I think you're oversimplifying. One thing we've all seen is that experts disagree, and they themselves are subject to non-scientific influences. There is no such thing as medical advice. There are competing medical opinions and proposals.

And I think it's false to say that Johnson has overlooked appeals from the health sector here. He has not overlooked them. He thinks they are wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 21, 2021, 12:40:31 AM
As said above, you still see different behaviours from different governments, when confronted with the various problems. There are, at least to some extent, differences in opinions represented in the press and among politicians; I think not acknowledging that would be over-simplifying things.

Regarding the appeal from the UK health sector, I was referring mostly to headlines this morning, including pleas from healthcare professionals, such as Matthew Taylor the chief executive of the NHS Confederation, and from the British Medical Association: that the time to act is now, regarding re-introducing restrictions -  then afterwards refused by health minister Edward Argar.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 21, 2021, 01:29:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 21, 2021, 12:40:31 AM
Regarding the appeal from the UK health sector, I was referring mostly to headlines this morning, including pleas from healthcare professionals, such as Matthew Taylor the chief executive of the NHS Confederation, and from the British Medical Association: that the time to act is now, regarding re-introducing restrictions -  then afterwards refused by health minister Edward Argar.

Yes, the Government has explicitly said that they think that the NHS Confederation is incorrect in its assessment. I don't know of course, and in any case I have an inkling that the Government's fundamental strategy is to set the NHS up to fail, in order to justify further privatisation -- which will be lucrative for them and their friends.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 21, 2021, 01:30:28 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 21, 2021, 12:40:31 AM
As said above, you still see different behaviours from different governments, when confronted with the various problems.

Regarding the appeal from the UK health sector, I was referring mostly to headlines this morning, including pleas from healthcare professionals, such as Matthew Taylor the chief executive of the NHS Confederation, and from the British Medical Association: that the time to act is now, regarding re-introducing restrictions -  then afterwards refused by health minister Edward Argar.

The pandemic has turned the sovereignty that was Australia into eight separate feudal states overseen by ambitious, politically motivated warlords. The federal government had the power to override all of them but just sat on its hands and prevaricated and procrastinated. This might cost them dearly at the expected federal elections in 2022

Going back to restrictions has to be a retrograde step. We simply have to learn to live with Covid as we did the major influenza outbreaks of a century ago. These influenzas could still be deadly to the vulnerable yet, like Covid, vaccination booster shots are available annually. We have to remember that the common cold and types of 'flu are in themselves older versions of RNA viruses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 21, 2021, 02:11:12 PM
Restrictions and requirements *are* "learning to live with it".

As it was in 1918.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 22, 2021, 08:05:39 AM
Quote from: Holden on October 21, 2021, 01:30:28 PM
The pandemic has turned the sovereignty that was Australia into eight separate feudal states overseen by ambitious, politically motivated warlords. The federal government had the power to override all of them but just sat on its hands and prevaricated and procrastinated. This might cost them dearly at the expected federal elections in 2022

Going back to restrictions has to be a retrograde step. We simply have to learn to live with Covid as we did the major influenza outbreaks of a century ago. These influenzas could still be deadly to the vulnerable yet, like Covid, vaccination booster shots are available annually. We have to remember that the common cold and types of 'flu are in themselves older versions of RNA viruses.
It's still mind-numbing how much Covid protocols and the efforts to prevent it from spreading are effecting day to day life....including possibly some world records.  For instance, Novak Djokovic may not be competing in the 2022 Australian Open as it seems like the PTB are likely to require all players to be double-jabbed by a certain date in order to play there.  Novak would be defending his title there...and also could break the 3-way tie that he, Federer and Nadal currently hold (all have won 20 slams).  Apparently a number of other players--both on the men's and women's sides--have refused to get vaccinated (so far anyway) including more players in the top 100 rankings (like Tsitsipas who is currently rank either No. 3 or No. 4).  And there's still always the chance of getting infected anyway which has lead to various tennis players having to withdraw from tournaments.

Very minor problems in the broader scope of things for certain though.

Quote from: SimonNZ on October 21, 2021, 02:11:12 PM
Restrictions and requirements *are* "learning to live with it".

As it was in 1918.

Good point Simon!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 22, 2021, 09:54:07 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 22, 2021, 08:05:39 AM
It's still mind-numbing how much Covid protocols and the efforts to prevent it from spreading are effecting day to day life....including possibly some world records.  For instance, Novak Djokovic may not be competing in the 2022 Australian Open as it seems like the PTB are likely to require all players to be double-jabbed by a certain date in order to play there.  Novak would be defending his title there...and also could break the 3-way tie that he, Federer and Nadal currently hold (all have won 20 slams).  Apparently a number of other players--both on the men's and women's sides--have refused to get vaccinated (so far anyway) including more players in the top 100 rankings (like Tsitsipas who is currently rank either No. 3 or No. 4).  And there's still always the chance of getting infected anyway which has lead to various tennis players having to withdraw from tournaments.

Very minor problems in the broader scope of things for certain though.

Good point Simon!

PD

Indeed: Nothing new under the sun.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 22, 2021, 02:31:24 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on October 21, 2021, 02:11:12 PM
Restrictions and requirements *are* "learning to live with it".

As it was in 1918.

'Easing' restrictions and requirements is learning to live with it as opposed to going back to them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 22, 2021, 03:37:47 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 22, 2021, 02:31:24 PM
'Easing' restrictions and requirements is learning to live with it as opposed to going back to them.

These things come in waves and here are spikes within waves so the journey out of this is going to be downward trending but not a simple straight line.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 22, 2021, 06:00:57 PM
Requiring that it be a straight line is flawed thinking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on October 22, 2021, 07:02:48 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 22, 2021, 02:31:24 PM
'Easing' restrictions and requirements is learning to live die with it as opposed to going back to them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 22, 2021, 11:10:39 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on October 22, 2021, 07:02:48 PM


Simon mentioned 1918 - it was actually 1918 to 1921 - and the Spanish flu eventually became endemic. Yes, some will die and if you think it can all be prevented then I suppose you are playing God. The vaccinated have a greatly increased chance of surviving Covid with very few effects, unlike those in 1918 who didn't have a vaccine like we do today. However, if you want to go down the death, doom and destruction road then that's your prerogative.

All but one of our state governments in Australia have decided to go away from 'zero Covid' and let the vaccination campaign do what it's supposed to do. The alternative is barely worth thinking about which is living in fear for many. Fear of what? Dying? If you haven't been vaccinated then that's a small but possible outcome. How small? If you research the data (and not listen to the various media) then the answer is very small and we are talking about if you actually contract Covid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 22, 2021, 11:57:53 PM
Bssic precautionary measures beyond vaccination alone is not "playing god". Nor is it "living in fear". It's a prudent inconvenience supporting the time for an effective vaccination rollout.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 23, 2021, 06:38:16 AM
Has anyone heard much about Novavax?  How imminently will it be released?  I did find this one article which was recently updated:  https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison  I know that it works differently from the other vaccines and am curious to see how effective it will end up being versus the other vaccines.

PD

p.s.  I just heard about it today when I was reading about one of the top tennis players saying that he was waiting for it to get approved (suggested to him by a doctor):  https://www.theage.com.au/sport/tennis/no-australian-open-for-unvaccinated-tennis-players-confirms-federal-minister-20211020-p591h9.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on October 26, 2021, 08:12:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 23, 2021, 06:38:16 AM
Has anyone heard much about Novavax?  How imminently will it be released?  I did find this one article which was recently updated:  https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison  I know that it works differently from the other vaccines and am curious to see how effective it will end up being versus the other vaccines.

PD

Looking over various web source, claimed effectiveness of the Novavax vaccine is about the same as the mRNA vaccines. It is a new technology where they make protein nanoparticle which displays the Covid-19 spike domain. Roughly speaking, I think the protein nanoparticle is like a virus capsid but with no RNA inside. The overall mode of activity is the same as the mRNA virus, in which there is a nanoparticle containing the mRNA, which is taken up by human cells and used to synthesize the spike protein inside human cells. The effect is the same, the immune system is exposed to the spike domain without the actual virus being present.

Both methods have the advantage that they are not based on an inactivated or mutated version of the actual virus. There is no chance of infection and the vacines can be formulated and re-formulated quickly. The most time-consuming part of the process is testing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2021, 10:14:06 AM
In minor news, I've scheduled my Pfizer booster for Monday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2021, 02:28:45 PM
Mass. extends universal mask mandate for most public schools through Jan. 15
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 02:45:02 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 26, 2021, 10:14:06 AM
In minor news, I've scheduled my Pfizer booster for Monday.

I wonder what the recommended wait time is between the two doses of Pfizer and the booster shot?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2021, 02:47:00 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 02:45:02 PM
I wonder what the recommended wait time is between the two doses of Pfizer and the booster shot?

Not sure, but my 2nd shot was in April.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 02:49:40 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 26, 2021, 02:47:00 PM
Not sure, but my 2nd shot was in April.

Yeah, I've been reading that it's about 6 months or so. If this is the case, I'll be scheduling one for March as I had my 2nd dose in September.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on October 26, 2021, 05:33:49 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 02:49:40 PM
Yeah, I've been reading that it's about 6 months or so. If this is the case, I'll be scheduling one for March as I had my 2nd dose in September.

Got my 2nd Pfizer shot on 5/5 and scheduled a booster as early as I could for 11/1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 05:38:31 PM
Quote from: Daverz on October 26, 2021, 05:33:49 PM
Got my 2nd Pfizer shot on 5/5 and scheduled a booster as early as I could for 11/1.

Very good, Daverz. So about a six month wait. I'll probably do the same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 26, 2021, 05:44:24 PM
Quote from: Daverz on October 26, 2021, 05:33:49 PM
Got my 2nd Pfizer shot on 5/5 and scheduled a booster as early as I could for 11/1.

My 2nd Pfizer was 4/5, so I'm past the 6-month point, but I'm 64 and boosters currently are only offered for age >=65 (plus exceptions for which I don't qualify). I'll get the booster as soon as the age limit comes down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 06:20:06 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 26, 2021, 05:44:24 PM
My 2nd Pfizer was 4/5, so I'm past the 6-month point, but I'm 64 and boosters currently are only offered for age >=65 (plus exceptions for which I don't qualify). I'll get the booster as soon as the age limit comes down.

Interesting. I wasn't aware that boosters are only available for ages 65 and up. I'll guess I will just have to continue to wait and see what happens.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 26, 2021, 06:38:46 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 06:20:06 PM
Interesting. I wasn't aware that boosters are only available for ages 65 and up. I'll guess I will just have to continue to wait and see what happens.

Might vary by state.
I'm in NY, one of the more pro-vaccine states, and just got e-mail today repeating (>= 65, 6 months since dose 2) at this time.
But echoed by this recent CDC page: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p1021-covid-booster.html
J&J booster available for (>=18, 2 months since dose), btw.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2021, 06:51:44 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 06:20:06 PM
Interesting. I wasn't aware that boosters are only available for ages 65 and up. I'll guess I will just have to continue to wait and see what happens.

May vary locally. I'm not yet 65.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 26, 2021, 06:58:06 PM
Quote from: T. D. on October 26, 2021, 06:38:46 PM
Might vary by state.
I'm in NY, one of the more pro-vaccine states, and just got e-mail today repeating (>= 65, 6 months since dose 2) at this time.
But echoed by this recent CDC page: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p1021-covid-booster.html
J&J booster available for (>=18, 2 months since dose), btw.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 26, 2021, 06:51:44 PM
May vary locally. I'm not yet 65.

I see. Thanks for the input, fellas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 27, 2021, 02:51:24 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on October 26, 2021, 08:12:51 AM
Looking over various web source, claimed effectiveness of the Novavax vaccine is about the same as the mRNA vaccines. It is a new technology where they make protein nanoparticle which displays the Covid-19 spike domain. Roughly speaking, I think the protein nanoparticle is like a virus capsid but with no RNA inside. The overall mode of activity is the same as the mRNA virus, in which there is a nanoparticle containing the mRNA, which is taken up by human cells and used to synthesize the spike protein inside human cells. The effect is the same, the immune system is exposed to the spike domain without the actual virus being present.

Both methods have the advantage that they are not based on an inactivated or mutated version of the actual virus. There is no chance of infection and the vacines can be formulated and re-formulated quickly. The most time-consuming part of the process is testing.
I had thought that it looked like it was about the same in terms of effectiveness; probably more curious as to whether or not there might be any added benefits of taking it vs. one of the other ones.  In any event, I've had my two jabs of a different one already for the year and need to figure out when I should get my third one.  But thank you though for looking into it!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 27, 2021, 02:57:03 AM
Vaccination status in Finland:

First dose: 75.1 % of whole population, 85.4 % of people 12 or older.
Second dose: 68.2 % of whole population, 77.5 % of people 12 or older.

Total corona related deaths during the pandemic: 1150.

In hospitals: 206 patients, of which 33 in intensive care.

My father will be getting his booster shot in two weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AM
Unfortunately, a rather rapid decline here, with 1871 new cases today in Denmark. More testing is being done, but the average positive percentage among them has gone up to 2%. Hospitalizations have more than doubled within a couple of weeks, reaching 200.
New vaccinations are very few, there's opposition among immigrants and the youngsters in particular. Restrictions are likely to be re-introduced very soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 27, 2021, 04:32:41 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AM
Unfortunately, a rather rapid decline here, with 1871 new cased today in Denmark. More testing is being done, but the average positive percentage among them has gone up to 2%. Hospitalizations have more than doubled within a couple of weeks, reaching 200.
New vaccinations are very few, there's opposition among immigrants and the youngsters in particular. Restrictions are likely to be re-introduced very soon.
Any idea in terms of which immigrant populations overall are against it?  Is it due to religious beliefs or???  And what age range re youngsters?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:58:19 AM
I haven't seen statistical surveys of the background for vaccine abstaining/refusals here, it's probably a mixture of reasons, including a lack of felt belonging to the surrounding community, fatalism, ignorance, general protest, and science scepticism. The lowest vaccination rates and biggest outbreaks are in the municipalities and communities west of Copenhagen centre with major immigrant populations (Ishøj, Vallensbæk, Høje Tåstrup, Tingbjerg etc). Rates are in the 60s I think among the total population there, where some other regions will reach the 70s or 80s.

We don't vaccinate children below the age of 12; around 65% of those aged 12 - 15 and aged 25 - 35 have been vaccinated, whereas those aged 15 - 25 are in the 80s.

There are currently no restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 27, 2021, 05:46:26 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:58:19 AM
I haven't seen statistical surveys of the background for vaccine abstaining/refusals here, it's probably a micture of reasons, including a lack of felt belonging to the surrounding community, fatalism, ignorance, general protest, and science scepticism. The lowest vaccination rates and biggest outbreaks are in the municipalities and communities west of Copenhagen centre with major immigrant populations (Ishøj, Vallensbæk, Høje Tåstrup, Tingbjerg etc). Rates are in the 60s I think among the total population there, where some other regions will reach the 70s or 80s.

We don't vaccinate children below the age of 12; around 65% of those aged 12 - 15 and aged 25 - 35 have been vaccinated, whereas those aged 15 - 25 are in the 80s.

There are currently no restrictions.
Does this sound about right in terms of what Ishøj is like?:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishøj_Municipality

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 05:58:33 AM
Yes, the wiki Ishøj article is correct. The name comes from ancient Nordic language, meaning 'hill with roof trees'.

37.5 % of the population are immigrants, the highest percentage among all  municipalities, and it is also the one with the lowest vaccination rates and the biggest outbreaks these days. These are some of the current facts. Restrictions might be introduced only locally, since the right wing in parliament seems to be against them nationwide now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on October 27, 2021, 06:10:38 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AM
Unfortunately, a rather rapid decline here, with 1871 new cased today in Denmark.

That's a lot, but sometimes the data is updated so that data from several days is added at once. 7-day average is a better indicator. Our cases varies between 300 and 1700 for this reason (they don't update so much during the weekend for example and they are getting more lazy because lets face it: The World at this point is totally fed up with this damn virus) and the average of cases per day is about 600 at the moment.

Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AMMore testing is being done, but the average positive percentage among them has gone up to 2%.
In Finland it is about 6 %, but the amount of tests has declined rapidly.

Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AMHospitalizations have more than doubled within a couple of weeks, reaching 200.
Not much different from what has happened here. We had half of the patients (about 100) a month ago. Luckily the amount of patients in intense care hasn't grown as much. They say 77 % of patients in hospitals are unvaccineted despite of most of the population being vaccinated.  :P

Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AMNew vaccinations are very few, there's opposition among immigrants and the youngsters in particular. Restrictions are likely to be re-introduced very soon.

Finland indroduced corona pass 1.5 weeks ago and apparently it has motivated some unvaccined to take the vaccine, but the amount of vaccinated people growns frustratingly slowly. Immigrants and the youngsters here too avoiding the jab.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 27, 2021, 07:29:37 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 27, 2021, 02:57:03 AM
My father will be getting his booster shot in two weeks.

Very good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 27, 2021, 10:24:26 AM
New cases down nearly 60 percent since delta variant surge (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/10/27/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 27, 2021, 01:00:56 PM
....and meanwhile, across the ditch in NZ....

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/300439983/sir-russell-coutts-slams-covid19-restrictions-accuses-government-of-dictatorship

Russell Coutts is a national icon and what he is saying quite simply stacks up. What is particularly interesting is how the vaccinated are still being lumped in with those who can't or won't. It seems to make the vaccination process somewhat pointless and certainly, those who have not been jabbed and are contemplating it, must be saying "Why bother, nothing will change for me anyway." What freedoms will I be given as soon as I'm vaccinated - at this point in time - virtually none. Good on you 'Stuff' for having the guts to publish this article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 27, 2021, 01:43:41 PM
Interesting model of the UK situation

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59039739
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 27, 2021, 03:46:47 PM
Quote from: Holden on October 27, 2021, 01:00:56 PM
....and meanwhile, across the ditch in NZ....

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/300439983/sir-russell-coutts-slams-covid19-restrictions-accuses-government-of-dictatorship

Russell Coutts is a national icon and what he is saying quite simply stacks up. What is particularly interesting is how the vaccinated are still being lumped in with those who can't or won't. It seems to make the vaccination process somewhat pointless and certainly, those who have not been jabbed and are contemplating it, must be saying "Why bother, nothing will change for me anyway." What freedoms will I be given as soon as I'm vaccinated - at this point in time - virtually none. Good on you 'Stuff' for having the guts to publish this article.

Groan...

I honestly had no idea who Russell Coutts is, but see from that he is a "sailing legend". An important voice in public health and pandemic management, then.


There you go: was that the reaction you were hoping for?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 27, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Oh, the guts it required to publish that ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 27, 2021, 05:30:41 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on October 27, 2021, 03:46:47 PM
Groan...

I honestly had no idea who Russell Coutts is, but see from that he is a "sailing legend". An important voice in public health and pandemic management, then.


There you go: was that the reaction you were hoping for?

No, it's not. Coutts has experience with what is happening overseas which is certainly very different to what NZ and parts of Australia are doing and therefore has some right to comment. He's seen a different approach and one he views as working. The part that resonates with me is the dichotomous approach to vaccination. While I am a proponent of vaccination it seems that a divide between those who are and those who aren't is deliberately being created. I can understand mandating the jab for certain sections of the community but the wholesale implementation across virtually every sector of society doesn't make sense.

The only people the unvaccinated put at risk are themselves and other unvaccinated persons so if they are prepared to take  that risk then that's their prerogative. They don't pose any threat to me (as someone who has had both doses of Astrazeneca) so I don't care if I'm standing next to an unvaccinated person.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 27, 2021, 06:27:19 PM
They also pose a risk to people who can't get the vaccination for legitimate reasons and they pose a risk to breakthrough cases for the vaccinated. And a risk to letting further variants develop that the current vaccines don't counter.

But you know this. It's all been said before. You just feel like having a stir.

Coutts has no more experience of worldwide approaches to covid than anyone with tv or the internet. Arguably even less than that given his statements.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on October 27, 2021, 11:58:01 PM
The problem is that you and other Kiwis are caught up in the parochial bubble where you don't actually know what's going on in other countries. Does this blinker your national way of thinking? What I'm reading in your press seem to suggest just that. We have similar approaches here in Australia, and I know this first hand living in Queensland and having a brother in WA.

If you think that me posing legitimate questions is stirring up the pot then so be it. You are entitled to think that and I welcome any debate on the matter. I pose questions because I have thought about what is going on and, like you Simon, have developed my own opinions. Those opinions may be right, wrong or indifferent and I am prepared to change them if presented with data that challenges what I believe. It's the blind acceptance of the 'status quo' by the masses that concerns me.

Bottom line for me on vaccination is that everyone (apart from those who are medically compromised) should have the jab. However, the way it is being mandated around how you earn your livelihood and who issues those mandates is where some human rights issues must arise.

One point to note is the uptake of the vaccine by Maori. This is the lowest represented group in the country and there are comparable figures for our own indigenous population. Does this stem from a deep rooted distrust of the Pakeha/Australian White Fella and are the current enforced mandates making this distrust even deeper?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on October 28, 2021, 12:08:14 AM
Quote from: Holden on October 27, 2021, 11:58:01 PM
The problem is that you and other Kiwis are caught up in the parochial bubble where you don't actually know what's going on in other countries.

Don't be daft.

Worldwide covid news on on the TV every night and everyone is on some form of global social media and/or online news.

Obviously.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 28, 2021, 01:03:54 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on October 27, 2021, 06:10:38 AM
That's a lot, but sometimes the data is updated so that data from several days is added at once. 7-day average is a better indicator. Our cases varies between 300 and 1700 for this reason (they don't update so much during the weekend for example and they are getting more lazy because lets face it: The World at this point is totally fed up with this damn virus) and the average of cases per day is about 600 at the moment.
In Finland it is about 6 %, but the amount of tests has declined rapidly.
Not much different from what has happened here. We had half of the patients (about 100) a month ago. Luckily the amount of patients in intense care hasn't grown as much. They say 77 % of patients in hospitals are unvaccineted despite of most of the population being vaccinated.  :P

Finland indroduced corona pass 1.5 weeks ago and apparently it has motivated some unvaccined to take the vaccine, but the amount of vaccinated people growns frustratingly slowly. Immigrants and the youngsters here too avoiding the jab.  :P

Yeah, as usual our nations are often quite comparable, except from you using the corona pass currently.

There's more political split-up here in the Danish parliament now, the Social Democrats are under pressure against any attempts at a restrictive policy, and the previous mink business/culling was done rapidly and without enough legal basis; recent investigations have discovered some muddy governmental proceedings in that respect, and now, important SMS communication between ministers and advisers has been deleted, for some not very democratically orientated reason.

Unfortunately, the right wing opposition people currently seem like a bunch of irresponsible and populist people, picking everything they've got for attacking the government, and supported by parts of the associated media. Yes, you could say it's partly their job, but some of those people would be disastrous for government, and surely cost lives, IMO, besides creating many more problems for the lower classes. I can't see any of them delivering much to have confidence in. The government has handled the virus very well IMO, and their social policy and international engagement are very good; statistics confirm all this. The only problem with the current government has been a too tough policy against immigration, including scandalous attempts at sending back Syrian refugees.

EDIT: The Prime Minister Frederiksen just said that she supports retrieving the lost SMS communication, and that she was advised to delete parts of it back then. She says it's done with al SMS communication after one month, following recommendations  from security advisers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 11:25:34 AM
Your still very infectious after you've been vaccinated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 28, 2021, 11:29:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 11:25:34 AM
Your still very infectious after you've been vaccinated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036

This is not news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on October 28, 2021, 12:27:36 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 11:25:34 AM
Your still very infectious after you've been vaccinated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036

Yes, and this is why I in a post above wrote, that the epidemy can't be controlled, but will continue to spread among the vaccinated people. The consequence is, that people at risk - like me - are even more at risk now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 12:33:49 PM
Some expert reaction

https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-study-on-household-transmission-of-sars-cov-2-looking-at-vaccination-status-and-variant-type/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 28, 2021, 01:30:05 PM
I think that statistics regarding this has been somewhat lacking, so it's good to have some now, even if it's just based on a few 100 cases. Would like a couple more similar surveys, but the results seem reasonably clear in this one. And it's not that vaccines don't work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 28, 2021, 05:17:21 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 28, 2021, 01:30:05 PM
I think that statistics regarding this has been somewhat lacking, so it's good to have some now, even if it's just based on a few 100 cases. Would like a couple more similar surveys, but the results seem reasonably clear in this one. And it's not that vaccines don't work.

No, indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 29, 2021, 06:30:47 AM
On CNN website:  "No unvaccinated players at Australian Open, says Victoria state Premier"

Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews said his government will not apply for travel permits to allow unvaccinated tennis players to compete at the Australian Open in the state after Prime Minister Scott Morrison indicated they would be allowed into the country.

Morrison said earlier on Wednesday that unvaccinated players would be free to compete at the grand slam after undergoing a two-week Covid-19 quarantine provided that Victoria, which hosts the tournament in Melbourne, applied for permits for them.
Andrews said his state would make no such applications.
"On behalf of every vaccinated Victorian who has done the right thing, my government will not be applying for an exemption for any unvaccinated player," he told reporters.
"If we don't apply for an exemption, then no exemption will be granted and then the whole issue is basically resolved."
Australia's borders have been effectively sealed for 18 months due to the Covid-19 pandemic, though authorities approve travel exemptions for special cases.
Victoria has been Australia's hardest-hit state, with its capital Melbourne locked down six times. The sixth lockdown ended on Friday, but only for fully vaccinated adults.
Unvaccinated adults remain banned from pubs, restaurants, sporting events and other parts of the economy, and may be shut out until well into 2022.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/27/tennis/australia-open-unvaccinated-players-spt-intl/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on October 29, 2021, 09:36:12 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on October 28, 2021, 12:27:36 PM
Yes, and this is why I in a post above wrote, that the epidemy can't be controlled, but will continue to spread among the vaccinated people. The consequence is, that people at risk - like me - are even more at risk now.

In Europe at least, the interventions are all about managing when the peaks and troughs are - regulating the flow for the health infrastructure. You prevent some disease in Winter 2021 by giving vaccine in Autumn, the vaccine eventually wanes, people start to catch it again in early summer 2022,  there'll then be the question of timing the fourth dose so that the peaks are manageable in Winter 2023, and so on.

My prediction is that the disease will become harder to control not because of any evolution in the biology of the virus, but because the people will become less cooperative about vaccination. The history of vaccination here in the Uk suggests that people clamour for vaccines when they're scared, and are pretty disinterested when they're not. That's why we'll all be led to authoritarian surveillance and punishment measures - vaccine passes, employment law demanding vaccination etc. Even Britain.

Familiarity breeds contempt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 29, 2021, 10:06:09 AM
That's one option.

Another option would be that as more and more people get in contact with cases that have been hard or fatal, and time passes without major side effects of vaccines, they'll join the vaccine programme. I've met and talked to people who lost relatives for example, and know a colleague, who suffers from long-term covid effects, besides the press reporting.

I agree though that if the prospects continue into say vaccine no.6, 7 or 8, the energy might fade out somewhat. Yet, procedures could also become a routine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 29, 2021, 11:22:38 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-29/russia-suffers-deadliest-sept-since-world-war-as-covid-untamed

Russia suffered its deadliest September since World War II, according to figures published Friday, even before the peak of its current wave of the Covid-19 pandemic forced authorities to order non-working days for the first week of November.

There were 44,265 deaths associated with the virus last month, bringing the pandemic's total to nearly half a million, according to Federal Statistics Service data published late Friday. That contributed to the highest number of September fatalities since the war, said Alexei Raksha, a demographer who left the agency last year after a dispute over its coronavirus numbers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on October 29, 2021, 11:39:53 AM
Quote from: T. D. on October 29, 2021, 11:22:38 AM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-29/russia-suffers-deadliest-sept-since-world-war-as-covid-untamed

Russia suffered its deadliest September since World War II, according to figures published Friday, even before the peak of its current wave of the Covid-19 pandemic forced authorities to order non-working days for the first week of November.

There were 44,265 deaths associated with the virus last month, bringing the pandemic's total to nearly half a million, according to Federal Statistics Service data published late Friday. That contributed to the highest number of September fatalities since the war, said Alexei Raksha, a demographer who left the agency last year after a dispute over its coronavirus numbers.

-> "Russia's average life expectancy has fallen by five years in the last 18 months, to about 69, he estimates. "
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 30, 2021, 11:42:02 AM
Since Trump lost the election, the Trumpiest areas of the country have had a death toll 50% higher than blue areas. The GOP is killing its own voters with its own lies. And they don't care.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on October 31, 2021, 02:06:35 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-31/colorado-lets-hospitals-turn-away-patients-as-covid-surges-anew
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 04, 2021, 10:40:17 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/covid-europe-epicentre-pandemic-who

It looks like cases are increasing dramatically in Europe and WHO are suggesting that countries impose non-pharmaceutical interventions to protect the health system from having to deal with lots and lots more cases.

As far as I can see there's no hope whatsoever of ever ditching the masks and the passes etc -- if countries adopt the values which led WHO to make that recommendation.

On the other hand, the UK approach means that the country is free of constraints, and  public health feels the pressure from people with covid, which it can handle -- but at the expense of dealing with serious elective therapies -- the joint replacements, the cancer therapies etc.

But there is a hope that these unwanted health effects of the UK strategy will attenuate -- by boosting vaccine effectiveness for example.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on November 04, 2021, 01:13:07 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 04, 2021, 10:40:17 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/covid-europe-epicentre-pandemic-who

It looks like cases are increasing dramatically in Europe and WHO are suggesting that countries impose non-pharmaceutical interventions to protect the health system from having to deal with lots and lots more cases.

As far as I can see there's no hope whatsoever of ever ditching the masks and the passes etc -- if countries adopt the values which led WHO to make that recommendation.

On the other hand, the UK approach means that the country is free of constraints, and  public health feels the pressure from people with covid, which it can handle -- but at the expense of dealing with serious elective therapies -- the joint replacements, the cancer therapies etc.

But there is a hope that these unwanted health effects of the UK strategy will attenuate -- by boosting vaccine effectiveness for example.

Just looking at current UK figures, it seems as if your vaccination campaign is doing its thing. I didn't check to see how many of the current cases were non vaxed but current trends would suggest a large proportion but that may not be the case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 05, 2021, 09:56:20 AM
Quote from: Holden on November 04, 2021, 01:13:07 PM
Just looking at current UK figures, it seems as if your vaccination campaign is doing its thing. I didn't check to see how many of the current cases were non vaxed but current trends would suggest a large proportion but that may not be the case.

I think it's clear that the European countries with a good vaccination rate supplemented with compulsory restrictions  are seeing less serious disease pro rata than the Uk. It would be a great surprise to me if vaccination alone would take the serious disease level of the UK to the level of France or Italy.

The UK is effectively sacrificing the lives of a small but not insignificant number of its citizens in order to avoid compulsory masks and such like.

Where does that come from? What political philosophy does that come from, what conception of liberty, equality and fraternity? How did we get to this?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 05, 2021, 03:30:51 PM
 The game changing, back to normal safely news I've been waiting for.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizer-says-antiviral-pill-cuts-risk-severe-covid-19-by-89-2021-11-05/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 01:02:49 AM
Nobody? This is interesting to me because I've mentioned this news to a number of people irl and elsewhere online and nobody is as excited as I am.

It's very weird for me to be the Pollyanna in a situation like this.

Is the skepticism a sort of "I'll believe it when I see it"?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 06, 2021, 01:09:55 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 05, 2021, 03:30:51 PM
The game changing, back to normal safely news I've been waiting for.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizer-says-antiviral-pill-cuts-risk-severe-covid-19-by-89-2021-11-05/

Hopefully a game changer on Covid patients currently overcrowding the hospitals and overtaxing health care systems, which in a lot of countries are close to breaking point....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 06, 2021, 01:13:22 AM
Given their record of fraud and deceit, I wouldn't trust Pfizer even if they said "It's a fine day today".

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history)

[Pfizer] will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter.

"The size and seriousness of this resolution, including the huge criminal fine of $1.3 billion, reflect the seriousness and scope of Pfizer's crimes," said Mike Loucks, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. "Pfizer violated the law over an extensive time period. Furthermore, at the very same time Pfizer was in our office negotiating and resolving the allegations of criminal conduct by its then newly acquired subsidiary, Warner-Lambert, Pfizer was itself in its other operations violating those very same laws. Today's enormous fine demonstrates that such blatant and continued disregard of the law will not be tolerated."

And this is going to be my first and last post on the topic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 06, 2021, 01:20:07 AM
It's hard to judge a single clinical trial, funded by the drug manufacturer, for which the data are not publicly available. Manufacturer funded trials are the single largest source of bias in science, given the ease of manipulating statistical significance with different analyses, excluding parts of the dataset, and so on; until the paper is published and findings are replicated by independent researchers I personally would remain skeptical. It is promising that they're moving to the next stage in the clinical trials so quickly; it's less promising that the FDA and other regulators are trying to get the drugs approved (a number of past medications were approved based on a single trial from the manufacturer, only for the results to turn out to not be replicable, or for undesirable side effects to be found, etc.)

I got burned out on miracle drugs by clinical trials for cancer therapies—there are so many cases where a new treatment seemed to have promise in stage I or II, and then fall apart in stage III, or for the findings to be not replicable by later researchers, or in some cases for later findings that the treatment in fact did more harm than good—and that's a field with generally high quality research with fewer conflicts of interest/manufacturers putting a thumb on the scale in some way.

That said this is obviously just a single person's opinion & I do trust medical science; just, with the acknowledgment that it is a process in a constant state of change, where a single data point is never sufficient to indicate scientific progress.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 06, 2021, 05:24:59 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 01:02:49 AM
Nobody? This is interesting to me because I've mentioned this news to a number of people irl and elsewhere online and nobody is as excited as I am.

It's very weird for me to be the Pollyanna in a situation like this.

Is the skepticism a sort of "I'll believe it when I see it"?
Thank you for that link.  I'm cautiously optimistic after reading it.  Fingers crossed here.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 06, 2021, 05:49:40 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 01:02:49 AM
Nobody? This is interesting to me because I've mentioned this news to a number of people irl and elsewhere online and nobody is as excited as I am.

It's very weird for me to be the Pollyanna in a situation like this.

Is the skepticism a sort of "I'll believe it when I see it"?

Good news, undeniably!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 06, 2021, 08:54:10 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 01:02:49 AM
Nobody? This is interesting to me because I've mentioned this news to a number of people irl and elsewhere online and nobody is as excited as I am.

It's very weird for me to be the Pollyanna in a situation like this.

Is the skepticism a sort of "I'll believe it when I see it"?

I read this story (which includes some statistics from the survey) when it came out on Friday [may need Google to avoid paywall].
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-05/pfizer-to-seek-u-s-nod-for-covid-pill-after-strong-results

Numbers look pretty good, but the survey only consisted of 1,219 people.
I follow financial markets, and the somewhat muted market reaction indicated that it's not generally seen as a "silver bullet", though the travel sector rallied.

My opinion is that the pill is good news, but it's for treatment of infected rather than protection from infection. Might even wind up reducing vaccination rates, so infections remain high with collateral threats to high-risk segments of the population.

And will anti-vaxxers even take the pill? Same source as the vaccine they avoid. Seems to me that it'd be easier for Bill Gates to imbed nefarious microchips in pills than in vaccines.  :laugh:

As far as Pfizer being evil: Possibly, and they're definitely profiteering by leaking results of a tiny survey and trying to speed approval. But that's the world we live in...big corporations dominate, and that's where any treatments will likely originate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 12:46:10 PM
Quote from: amw on November 06, 2021, 01:20:07 AM
It's hard to judge a single clinical trial, funded by the drug manufacturer, for which the data are not publicly available. Manufacturer funded trials are the single largest source of bias in science, given the ease of manipulating statistical significance with different analyses, excluding parts of the dataset, and so on; until the paper is published and findings are replicated by independent researchers I personally would remain skeptical. It is promising that they're moving to the next stage in the clinical trials so quickly; it's less promising that the FDA and other regulators are trying to get the drugs approved (a number of past medications were approved based on a single trial from the manufacturer, only for the results to turn out to not be replicable, or for undesirable side effects to be found, etc.)

I got burned out on miracle drugs by clinical trials for cancer therapies—there are so many cases where a new treatment seemed to have promise in stage I or II, and then fall apart in stage III, or for the findings to be not replicable by later researchers, or in some cases for later findings that the treatment in fact did more harm than good—and that's a field with generally high quality research with fewer conflicts of interest/manufacturers putting a thumb on the scale in some way.

That said this is obviously just a single person's opinion & I do trust medical science; just, with the acknowledgment that it is a process in a constant state of change, where a single data point is never sufficient to indicate scientific progress.

All good points. Thanks.

How do you feel about the Merck pill which has now been approved for use in Britain?

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/britain-approves-mercks-oral-covid-19-pill-2021-11-04/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 08, 2021, 06:42:44 AM
Tangentially: Return of scurvy under Tory rule as cases of Victorian illness double in decade.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 08, 2021, 10:57:26 AM
Russia's Petty Race With the West Ends in Dire COVID Crisis (https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-russia-botched-its-covid-19-response-in-every-possible-way)

In Russia, however, the trends are heading in the opposite direction, based on even the most conservative official figures. On Wednesday, the country of 146 million people set all-time official records for daily cases (around 36,000) and deaths (nearly 1,100).

And it's possible the actual numbers are worse than the official ones. Critics have credibly accused Moscow of cooking the books in order to downplay the seriousness of the crisis and insulate the government from criticism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 08, 2021, 11:20:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on October 27, 2021, 04:07:08 AM
Unfortunately, a rather rapid decline here, with 1871 new cases today in Denmark. More testing is being done, but the average positive percentage among them has gone up to 2%. Hospitalizations have more than doubled within a couple of weeks, reaching 200.
New vaccinations are very few, there's opposition among immigrants and the youngsters in particular. Restrictions are likely to be re-introduced very soon.

   So, following a rise in the number of cases, with several days in a row exceeding 2000, and hospitalizations going from ~10 daily up to ~50-60, planned new restrictions were just announced here in Denmark ... including the re-introduction of a Corona Passport, albeit relevant for fewer activities than the previous one, and primarily targeted at night life, indoor restaurants/cafes, and large gatherings.

   On the positive side, the vaccines work: practically none of those vaccinated aged less than 50 years have been hospitalized; vaccination also hinders 95 % of hospitalizations for those younger than 65 years, and 76 % of those older than 65 years; a 3rd booster jab will make the last group reach 90 % as well; overall, the vaccination rate among those invited is now 88 %, the target still being set at 90 %. Proportionally, non-vaccinated people produce 15 times more hospitalizations, than the vaccinated, it was said. And the passport is likely to promote vaccinations - due to convenience, and because you'll need less testing then. After the announcement, 11,000 more people actually queued for vaccines.

  The scepticism towards restrictions from the political opposition hasn't hindered any of these plans so far, but there'll be further negotiations; signals from  at least some opposition members however seem to secure the measures. The government is not planning for any major, national close-down, it was said. But still, when they've been implemented, I suppose there'll be further actions, within maybe a few weeks; since these restrictions probably aren't going to lower the number of cases significantly, though they might reduce the growth.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 08, 2021, 11:41:20 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 08, 2021, 11:20:01 AM
   So, following a rise in the number of cases, with several days in a row exceeding 2000, and hospitalizations going from ~10 daily up to ~50-60, planned new restrictions were just announced here in Denmark ... including the re-introduction of a Corona Passport, albeit relevant for fewer activities than the previous one, and primarily targeted at night life, indoor restaurants/cafes, and large gatherings.

   On the positive side, the vaccines work: practically none of those vaccinated aged less than 50 years have been hospitalized; vaccination also hinders 95 % of hospitalizations for those younger than 65 years, and 76 % of those older than 65 years; a 3rd booster jab will make the last group reach 90 % as well; overall, the vaccination rate among those invited is now 88 %, the target still being set at 90 %. Proportionally, non-vaccinated people produce 15 times more hospitalizations, than the vaccinated, it was said. And the passport is likely to promote vaccinations - due to convenience, and because you'll need less testing then. After the announcement, 11,000 more people actually queued for vaccines.

  The scepticism towards restrictions from the political opposition hasn't hindered any of these plans so far, but there'll be further negotiations; signals from  at least some opposition members however seem to secure the measures. The government is not planning for any major, national close-down, it was said. But still, when they've been implemented, I suppose there'll be further actions, within maybe a few weeks; since these restrictions probably aren't going to lower the number of cases significantly, though they might reduce the growth.

We have about twice the rate of hospital admissions as you do, and there are no plans for any restrictions here. I leave it to others to draw conclusions.

DK pop 6M; 50 admissions a day -- 8/Million

UK pop 67M; 1K admissions a day  -- 15/Million
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 08, 2021, 02:30:12 PM
As written above, the vaccines work well in reducing the number of hospitalizations and severe cases.

By far, it's the non-vaccinated that deliver the food chain for the virus, but vaccines can't be made obligatory, plus there are the youngest groups where there aren't any approved vaccines (yet). It's about 76% of the total population, that is vaccinated in Denmark.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 08, 2021, 02:58:31 PM
Well, you could say, let the non-vaccinated go to their own hell, of course, and let's accept a bigger number, maybe even a much bigger number, of dead people among the outcast. Not the attitude here, it would be considered a failure of government. Also, a lot of virus will increase the risk for all, including the most vulnerable people in society, those forced to isolation etc. It is one of about 4 countries, where there hasn't been any total mortality above average during the pandemic. The health sector is believed to be able to deal with a maximum of about 1000 corona hospitalizations, though less will of course be much preferable, since the strain affects other sectors in it.

Goodnight.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 08, 2021, 03:15:49 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 08, 2021, 02:40:35 PM
If this is so, then why the fear and the restrictions?

This is extremely simplified math to illustrate why:

If the risk of hospitalisation is X for vaccinated, it is about 10*X for unvaccinated. So, if 80 % of people are vaccinated, the effective risk is 0.8*X+0.2*10*X = 2.8*X. If the hospitals can take say 2.5*X, there are serious problems. If 90 % of people were vaccinated instead, the effective risk would be 0.9*X+0.1*10*X = 1.9*X and the burden to hospitals would be much lower.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 08, 2021, 04:36:21 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 06, 2021, 12:46:10 PM
All good points. Thanks.

How do you feel about the Merck pill which has now been approved for use in Britain?

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/britain-approves-mercks-oral-covid-19-pill-2021-11-04/
About the same—it's very strange to approve a drug on the basis of a single clinical trial whose results haven't been made public. I certainly hope it'll work out and prove effective, but would be extremely unsurprised if it turned out to have unforeseen negative side effects severe enough that the approval had to be rescinded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 08, 2021, 06:57:56 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 08, 2021, 02:58:31 PM
Well, you could say, let the non-vaccinated go to their own hell, of course, and let's accept a bigger number, maybe even a much bigger number, of dead people among the outcast. Not the attitude here, it would be considered a failure of government. Also, a lot of virus will increase the risk for all, including the most vulnerable people in society, those forced to isolation etc. It is one of about 4 countries, where there hasn't been any total mortality above average during the pandemic. The health sector is believed to be able to deal with a maximum of about 1000 corona hospitalizations, though less will of course be much preferable, since the strain affects other sectors in it.

Goodnight.

Are you sure that the problem isn't vaccine waning, rather than the number of unvaccinated? A friend of mine recently estimated the half life of the vaccines at one month - that's to say the antibody titre count in vaccinated people halfs every month. I'll post the argument details if you want.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 09, 2021, 06:57:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 08, 2021, 06:57:56 PM
Are you sure that the problem isn't vaccine waning, rather than the number of unvaccinated? A friend of mine recently estimated the half life of the vaccines at one month - that's to say the antibody titre count in vaccinated people halfs every month. I'll post the argument details if you want.

Who is this friend and where does he get his numbers. The number I keep seeing for the mRNA vaccines (independent scientific studies, FDA, CDC reports) is that antibodies decline by about 50% after about 6 months.

Antibody levels are reported because they are easy to measure. There is more to the immune system than antibodies. Making an antibody is a time consuming process. The immune system starts generating random sequences and when one is found to stick, the immune system starts mass producing the effective antibody. The human immune system also has 'memory' cells which allow it to produce the antibody again, without going through the search process. Immunity doesn't necessarily fade as fast an antibody studies suggest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 09, 2021, 07:32:40 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 09, 2021, 06:57:04 AM
Who is this friend and where does he get his numbers. The number I keep seeing for the mRNA vaccines (independent scientific studies, FDA, CDC reports) is that antibodies decline by about 50% after about 6 months.

Antibody levels are reported because they are easy to measure. There is more to the immune system than antibodies. Making an antibody is a time consuming process. The immune system starts generating random sequences and when one is found to stick, the immune system starts mass producing the effective antibody. The human immune system also has 'memory' cells which allow it to produce the antibody again, without going through the search process. Immunity doesn't necessarily fade as fast an antibody studies suggest.

See what you make of this

The data is in this paper

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786096

The analysis I received was as follows, I haven't enquired about the US vaccine efficiency studies he refers to. 

From the paper there were 97 boosters given an average of 221 days after last vaccination to an elderly population (median age was 70 years).

Titer before booster 440 AU/mL
Titer after booster 25,468 AU/mL

Let's assume that the after titer looks a bit like the titer at the end of their second dose, then that is a fall of 25468/440 = 58x in 221 days, or a half-life for antibody titer of 221(days) x log(2)/log(58) = 38 days. Amount of protection from infection, symptoms, hospitalisation and death will depend on absolute antibody titer, but protection is halving about every month and a bit.

That rate was noted previously by Vaccine Efficacy studies in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 10, 2021, 06:14:56 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 09, 2021, 07:32:40 AM
See what you make of this

The data is in this paper

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786096

The analysis I received was as follows, I haven't enquired about the US vaccine efficiency studies he refers to. 

From the paper there were 97 boosters given an average of 221 days after last vaccination to an elderly population (median age was 70 years).

Titer before booster 440 AU/mL
Titer after booster 25,468 AU/mL

Let's assume that the after titer looks a bit like the titer at the end of their second dose, then that is a fall of 25468/440 = 58x in 221 days, or a half-life for antibody titer of 221(days) x log(2)/log(58) = 38 days. Amount of protection from infection, symptoms, hospitalisation and death will depend on absolute antibody titer, but protection is halving about every month and a bit.

That rate was noted previously by Vaccine Efficacy studies in the US.


The half-life calculation is correct, but there are some assumptions. This assumes the level after the initial shot is the same as the level after the booster. At the time of the booster the levels might have been higher than after the initial vaccination, since the immune system has had prior exposure to the antigen. It might be decaying from a lower level.

Any my previous comment applies, there is more to the immune system than antibodies. There are memory cells that retain the ability to make the antibody again. That is not as quick a response than having a high antibody level, but it is a stronger response than making antibodies after initial exposure. And, these are 70 year olds, not a representative sample.

Again, what I seem to hear from U.S. public health agencies is in the neighborhood of 50% loss of efficiency after 6 months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 10, 2021, 09:50:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 08, 2021, 06:57:56 PM
Are you sure that the problem isn't vaccine waning, rather than the number of unvaccinated? A friend of mine recently estimated the half life of the vaccines at one month - that's to say the antibody titre count in vaccinated people halfs every month. I'll post the argument details if you want.

You may have point there, and it might be a problem in the longer run, but it's not being focused on right now. It will require a good deal of math, predictions and knowledge to calculate. The 3rd, improving booster jab is planned for, almost 10% of the vaccinated having got it, and mine for example likely in January; details will be presented soon. They say that all unvaccinated are very likely to get the virus, within half a year to one year.

Hospitalizations and health cost are of course a dimension of all this; individual sickness, long-term effects and the amount of fatalities are also aspects of it. But add to this the gradual improvements in new vaccines, treatment options, and new medicine ... it's been called a 'race', or even a (morbid) 'dance'.


BTW, a survey of political voting and vaccine refusal was presented here. As you could expect, the vaccine refusers are mainly from the right-wing side of the political specter, who are also sceptics towards regulations and the welfare state. Or they are non-voters:

- Party D ('Surely, scr*w the immigrants. Scr*w the poor, so they can learn. Help The Rich, via diminishing the tax and state burden')(21% of voters refusing);
- Party I ('But some immigrants, including Non-Western, can be good for profits and non-state dynamics. Help The Rich, diminish the state')(15% refusing);
- Party O ('Well, keep parts of the welfare state for us real Danes, but sc*ew the immigrants. And let's remember, the old days were just better.')(9% refusing)
- Didn't vote at all: 12% refusing
- Various very small parties, fringe parties, esoteric parties, vegans, spiritualism, etc.: 16% refusing

Traditional, central parties with government experience have about 3% - 7% refusers (Parties A, B, V, K)

Established leftist parties have about 7% - 8% refusers (Parties F, Ø)

( Source: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2021-11-09-saerligt-to-partier-har-hoej-andel-vaccineskeptikere-blandt-deres-vaelgere )
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 10, 2021, 09:57:16 AM
Coronavirus infections rise in northern states, Mountain West, as holidays near (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/11/10/coronavirus-cases-increase-northern-states-mountain-west/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 13, 2021, 12:25:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 11:25:34 AM
Your still very infectious after you've been vaccinated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036

Now there are, on the contrary, surveys here saying that non-vaccinated will be 6-9 times more infectuous for others, than the vaccinated. Somewhat disputed terrain, it seems.

Also, the youngest children, obviously unvaccinated, are pointed to as very important carriers of the virus, besides the unvaccinated - and new possible vaccines for them have probably been developed too late to avoid that in the oncoming winter months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 13, 2021, 06:46:01 AM
Nice explanation of how vaccines work here

https://twitter.com/drneilstone/status/1459267407550332930?s=21
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 13, 2021, 09:19:41 AM
(IMO) the US "vaccine mandate" is going to get struck down in court:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/13/federal-appeals-court-calls-biden-vaccine-mandate-fatally-flawed-and-staggeringly-overbroad-.html

Story concludes with
...David Vladeck, a professor of law at Georgetown University, told CNBC that there's a "high probability" the case will ultimately end up in the Supreme Court, where there's a conservative majority.

"There are justices on the court who want to rein in the administrative state and this is a case in which those concerns are likely to come to the fore," Vladeck told CNBC on Monday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 13, 2021, 10:29:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on October 28, 2021, 11:25:34 AM
Your still very infectious after you've been vaccinated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036

Very is a very relative term...

Less likely to become infectious, and if so, for a (much) shorter period of time.

The BBC article focuses on people living together, which is a very specific situation in which the risk of cross infection is the highest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on November 13, 2021, 04:32:49 PM
Interesting article on modeling Covid outcomes. I've done a copy and paste as it's behind a paywall

Lies, damn lies and modelling? Why COVID forecasts haven't all come to pass


   
Lies, damn lies and modelling? Why COVID forecasts haven't all come to pass

Rachel Clun


Hundreds of thousands of deaths. ICUs in overwhelmed hospitals struggling to cope under extreme pressure on beds and ventilators. The numbers were splashed in headlines across Australia.

In March last year, federal government modelling said that in a worst-case scenario up to 150,000 Australians could die from COVID-19. Modelling also forecast nearly 3000 cases a day in Victoria during an October peak of the latest outbreak and hundreds of cases in ICU and hospital.

Victoria could be recording thousands of COVID-19 cases a day by late October, modelling has shown.

But thankfully neither of these scenarios – nor other grim, headline-grabbing forecasts – have come to pass.

Critics have said this is proof that the scientists and public health experts behind the modelling are wrong and just want to see the country locked down for good.

But modelling is not a crystal ball prediction of the future. The experts behind some of the country's best-known modelling, from the Doherty Institute and Burnet Institute, have been saying that for anyone who cares to listen.

It's a tough science communication gig, according to Dr Nick Scott, head of modelling and biostatistics at the Burnet.

"You can't expect them to be correct for more than a week or even two weeks at most, in the same way that you could never expect a weather forecast to be accurate that far out," he says.

Why does it change? Why does some modelling paint a disastrous picture? And why do different experts or institutions end up with wildly different results?

Firstly, modelling is based on data. And at the beginning of the pandemic, there wasn't much of it.

"Your model will only be as good as the information you have," says Professor Jodie McVernon, director of Doherty Epidemiology at the Doherty Institute.

New variants. Different public health measures. More information about how effective vaccines are. As all this changes, so too does the modelling. "The model projections are basically the best we can do with the available evidence at the time," Scott says. "Over time, our picture of that data gets clearer and clearer."

Even in the months since completing the major modelling used to underpin the country's reopening plan, the data has vastly improved, McVernon says.

"At that point, Delta was a brand new thing, we didn't know as much about it, we hadn't had as much opportunity to see how well the vaccines worked. And so we made a whole set of assumptions based on what we knew back in July," she says.

But after going back and adjusting some of their parameters for the latest November modelling, McVernon says when they were put in the model, they got essentially the same results as July.

So why didn't Sydney, for instance, end up with thousands of hospitalisations and ICU admissions, and a peak of 2000 cases a day?
Jodie McVernon, Director of epidemiology at the Doherty Institute in Melbourne.

Jodie McVernon, Director of epidemiology at the Doherty Institute in Melbourne.Credit:Simon Schluter

McVernon says it's important to note that if the modelling said there was going to be hundreds of new cases a day, that's a scenario, not a prediction. "That was allowing you to compare one strategy with another strategy; a different coverage level, a different set of measures, to see whether you would expect one [strategy] to be better or worse," she adds.

New data has also played a role, specifically around the effectiveness of vaccines. In a huge positive, they have been far more effective at preventing hospitalisation and severe illness than originally thought, with all three vaccines currently being used in Australia performing better in real-world settings than they did in the original trials.

"It's actually quite a clear example of why projections will change over time when new data becomes available," Scott says. "In updated models, we have the benefit of more data on vaccines. So that all goes in and it helps to inform the next set of decisions that need to be made."

As the data changes, so too do the questions that governments want answered.


"In very early scenarios, the biggest question we had was 'how severe was this disease going to be?'," she said. "And we had vast ranges of possibilities right back at the beginning."

Models themselves can also vary – from back-of-the-envelope calculations to detailed and complex mathematical equations. Assumptions about things including how effective the vaccine will be can have a huge impact on the results.

"While most modellers will try to use the best available evidence, the way they incorporate that into the model might be slightly different," McVernon says. "So we have seen some models that have had more pessimistic predictions about clinical cases and others that have been less so."

Projected case numbers and hospitalisations are one thing. But what governments and policymakers really want to know from the modelling is what is the best decision they can make.

The original modelling looked at scenarios around how bad the pandemic could be for the country. The latest tranche was much more detailed. Rather than looking at a national scenario, there are granular investigations of outbreaks in school settings, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, local government area-specific modelling and a look at the risk of COVID-19 from international arrivals.

"The more information we have, the more we can bring that into the model. And that will actually make it more likely to produce meaningful outcomes," McVernon says.

Modelling is also not in itself a solution. It's up to governments to decide what actions they should take and what risks they're willing to bear.

"The reason that the actual model is useful is that a lot of these things are not linear," McVernon says.

This has become increasingly obvious as states and territories reveal opening plans: NSW and Victoria are more willing to continue living with levels of COVID-19 in the community, while Western Australia wants at least 90 per cent of its population vaccinated before it considers fully reopening.

The strength of modelling is it pulls together all the pieces of information at hand – the effectiveness of vaccines, the effect of social distancing and working-from-home measures – puts them in one spot and shows what happens when governments do or don't combine them.

"They just need continual updating. But they are helpful when you need to make a decision about what you're going to do tomorrow or next week," Scott concludes.

Rachel Clun is a federal political reporter at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, covering health.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 14, 2021, 04:56:58 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 13, 2021, 12:25:08 AM
Now there are, on the contrary, surveys here saying that non-vaccinated will be 6-9 times more infectuous for others, than the vaccinated. Somewhat disputed terrain, it seems.

At our PM's latest press conference, Brostrøm or Ullum said something like this, referring to an article from England without elaborating it further. i have not seen any facts about this, which must be categorized as very good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 14, 2021, 08:43:21 AM
Innumeracy plus bad-faith actors plus internet rapidity

Covid misinformation spreads because so many Americans are awful at math

Two-step calculations are hard enough for some, but assessing vaccine effectiveness requires multiple steps.

By James Surowiecki

James Surowiecki is a journalist and the author of "The Wisdom of Crowds."

On July 25, Jeremy McAnulty, the director of health protection for the Australian state of New South Wales, turned himself into a meme. While presenting the state's daily covid-19 hospitalization numbers, McAnulty said 141 people were in the hospital with covid, 43 of those in intensive care. He provided an age breakdown of the hospitalized and of those in the ICU. And then he said something utterly unexpected: "All but one are vaccinated."

This was, to anyone who knew anything about the coronavirus and the vaccines, not just improbable but effectively impossible. The simplest, most obvious explanation was that McAnulty had misspoken, saying "vaccinated" when he meant "unvaccinated." And this was exactly what had happened. When he took questions a short while later, a reporter asked about his statement, and he said: "I think I misspoke before. Of the 43 people in intensive care units, 42 have not been vaccinated."

But it was too late. Anti-vaxxers around the world flooded Facebook and Twitter with clips of McAnulty's misstatement. The right-wing "news" site Gateway Pundit picked up and amplified the false information. These posts and tweets of course omitted the fact that McAnulty had quickly corrected himself, with some adding a lie by claiming that McAnulty had been speaking not just of ICU patients in New South Wales but of all the covid hospitalizations there. They trumpeted what he had said as evidence that the vaccines were "literally useless" at best and downright harmful at worst.

The speed and efficiency with which McAnulty's misstatement traveled testify to the way anti-vaxxers and vaccine skeptics use social media to disseminate the message that the vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and dangerous. But they also demonstrate how the successful spread of that message depends on an unfortunate fact: An awful lot of people just don't do math. The message lands easily because of the general innumeracy — and specifically the ignorance of statistics — of the people consuming it. It takes only an elementary grasp of math to see that McAnulty's initial statement was self-evidently unbelievable. At the time, most of New South Wales's population was unvaccinated. So even if the vaccines were totally ineffective, meaning vaccinated and unvaccinated people were equally likely to be hospitalized, some unvaccinated people would have ended up in the hospital with covid. But tens of thousands of people happily believed otherwise without a second thought.

What's often called motivated reasoning is at least partly to blame — people believed something that was mathematically nonsensical because they wanted to believe it. But too many people couldn't recognize it as mathematically nonsensical. Americans are generally bad at math. A 2012 global study of the math skills of 16-to-65-year-olds found that American adults were less numerate than adults in most other developed countries. On a scale ranking skills from Level 1 to Level 5, with Level 5 the highest, 60 percent of Americans were at Level 2 or below, and almost 30 percent were at Level 1, which meant they struggled with even two-step calculations. That's a serious problem when it comes to evaluating vaccine effectiveness, since doing so requires multiple steps: looking at what percentage of total covid hospitalizations or deaths are among the vaccinated, looking at what percentage of the population is vaccinated, and then adjusting for that and for age to calculate how much more likely an unvaccinated person is to be hospitalized or die.

Lots of people, of course, never get that far. They make simpler mistakes: thinking that if 30 percent of people testing positive are vaccinated, that means 30 percent of vaccinated people tested positive, or believing that if a vaccine is 95 percent effective against hospitalization, that means 5 percent of vaccinated people will end up in the hospital. And it isn't just random people on Twitter who make these errors. CNN, in an article on how to fly safely, infamously suggested that a 90 percent effective vaccine would still mean that 10 percent of vaccinated fliers might catch the coronavirus. (What it really means is that a vaccinated person's risk of being infected on the plane would be 90 percent lower than an unvaccinated person's risk.)

Innumeracy, as the CNN example suggests, is not the province of any one group. And both sides in the information war over vaccines have used dubious statistics. But since the numbers show that vaccination offers excellent protection against hospitalization and death, covid skeptics and anti-vaxxers have become adept at exploiting people's innumeracy to instill doubts.

Some of these tricks are straightforward. When Vermont, which has the highest vaccination rate of any state, saw coronavirus cases rise from a very low base in late summer to a few hundred a day, and saw hospitalizations climb into the double digits, vaccine skeptics didn't say that Vermont still had some of the nation's lowest case and hospitalization rates, or that its absolute numbers were still very small. Instead, they said Vermont's cases were up "10,000%." Saying "Vermont has 300 cases a day" wouldn't have had quite the same effect, especially given that states like Florida were recording five times as many cases at the time. They also failed to mention that unvaccinated people in Vermont were far more likely to test positive for the coronavirus and to be hospitalized for it. The mere fact that Vermont's cases were up was taken as evidence that the vaccines don't work.

Similarly, when vaccine skeptics focus on countries that have had (or have) high case rates despite also having high vaccination rates, like Israel and Britain, and compare them unfavorably with the United States, they never mention that these other countries test far more than the United States does. That means that those countries identify many more infections than the United States does, and that their larger per capita caseloads are largely an artifact of testing. This summer, for instance, Southern states with low rates of vaccination had much higher positive test rates than Israel did, suggesting that their coronavirus infection rate was much higher as well. But because they were testing so much less, the states' case counts looked better. And so the most common social media refrain from vaccine skeptics in July and August was "What about Israel?," not "What about Tennessee and Mississippi?"

The most important place where innumeracy has helped foster vaccine skepticism is in the debate over vaccine effectiveness against severe illness and death. Vaccinated people can, and do, get severely ill and die of covid. So skeptics regularly point to the absolute number of deaths from breakthrough cases, or the share of total covid deaths accounted for by vaccinated people, as proof that the vaccines are failing.

The problems with this "analysis" are straightforward. First, if you're trying to determine the effectiveness of vaccines, you need to know more than the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths that vaccinated people account for. You also need to factor in the percentage of people who have been vaccinated, and adjust accordingly to determine the mortality and hospitalization rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

Second, to get a true picture of vaccine effectiveness, you also have to adjust for age. There are two basic facts about covid and vaccines: Since the pandemic began, seniors have accounted for most covid deaths and severe illness; and seniors are the most vaccinated group, while most unvaccinated people are young. As a result, naive comparisons of the covid mortality and hospitalization rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated people understate vaccine effectiveness, since so many unvaccinated people are young and therefore less likely to be hospitalized with covid or to die of it.

To correctly measure vaccine effectiveness, then, you need to compare the mortality and hospitalization rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated people of the same age. And when you do this, it becomes clear how risky being unvaccinated is. In Oklahoma, for instance, the state says around 17 percent of seniors are not fully vaccinated. But those 17 percent account for 70 percent of all senior hospitalizations in the state over the past month. That means unvaccinated seniors in Oklahoma are 11 times more likely to be hospitalized for covid than vaccinated seniors are.

The math behind that "11 times" number isn't complicated. But it isn't obvious, either, and it does take a willingness to do it yourself, which lots of people understandably can't or don't want to do. As a result, simply presenting big numbers without context — a 10,000 percent increase; 3o percent of hospitalizations — ends up being an effective technique for making vaccines look bad. And while there are lots of people on social media debunking fake stats and providing more rigorous statistical analysis, if you don't trust them, there's no reason you'll trust their math.

Public health authorities have often made this situation worse by the way they collect (or don't collect) data and present it. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's state vaccination numbers, for instance, sometimes conflict with the numbers provided by state departments of health, and it's not clear why. While some states — among them Oklahoma and Connecticut — do a good job of presenting data on cases, severe illness and death among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, plenty of other states do much less. Go to Florida's covid-19 website, and you will search in vain for the daily numbers of reported cases and tests. And the state offers no data at all on hospitalizations and deaths by vaccination status.

Public health officials have also hurt their credibility by oscillating between making statistically dubious claims about vaccine effectiveness — Anthony Fauci's saying that coronavirus surges like the ones we saw last year were unlikely once the vaccination rate reached 50 percent in a community, for example — and making scary, dubious claims about the risks of the delta variant to the vaccinated. There is no quick fix for innumeracy. But public health officials can help mitigate the problem by being rigorous in their messaging and careful to present data in a clear, comparative way. (Connecticut's weekly covid reports, for instance, show not just the absolute numbers but also the relative risk of infection and hospitalization for unvaccinated people in an easy-to-understand format.) If they don't, their mistakes will be weaponized by anti-vaxxers to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 09:04:35 AM
The Guardian is reporting some events in Austria which seem unprecedented in post war Europe to me. If the article is correct, they will be effectively imposing a form of soft house arrest on the unvaccinated teenagers and adults living there - leave your home for work and other basic activities but you can't leave for anything else. No visits to friends, they are banned from restaurants and swimming pools, cinema, theatre, concerts, exhibitions, beaches and holiday resorts. This is being monitored by the police.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 14, 2021, 04:53:17 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 09:04:35 AMThe Guardian is reporting some events in Austria which seem unprecedented in post war Europe to me.


It is a public health police state.  Some people will think it acceptable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 08:23:18 PM
Quote from: Todd on November 14, 2021, 04:53:17 PM

It is a public health police state.  Some people will think it acceptable.

Pfizer macht frei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 14, 2021, 11:57:59 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 08:23:18 PM
Pfizer macht frei.

Seriously? A holocaust comparison?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:30:57 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 14, 2021, 11:57:59 PM
Seriously? A holocaust comparison?

I don't know if locking down a ubiquitous group in a society is morally and politically more problematic than locking down a region. I need to think about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 15, 2021, 12:42:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 08:23:18 PM
Pfizer macht frei.

This is literally true. If you're jabbed, you're (relatively) free. If you are not jabbed, you are not free. It's as simple as that.

What we've been witnessing since March 2020, the vast majority of people's reactions ranging from indifferent passivity to enthusiastic support, is global capitalism's latest (and possibly final) assault on whatever vestiges of democracy and freedom were still in place (and be it noted that actually the said democracy was never anything else than the creation and the tool of the capital). Usually, totalitarianism creates and exploits fear in order to establish and keep itself in place. In this case, though, the cleverest trick was to use an already existing one, the oldest and greatest of man's fear: fear of death.  A stroke of genius, no doubt, but one which (will) have grim and dire consequences.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on November 15, 2021, 01:25:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:30:57 AM
I don't know if locking down a ubiquitous group in a society is morally and politically more problematic than locking down a region. I need to think about it.

I have thought about it. It's reprehensible. The comparison to this is what happened in the '30s. The Star of David mandated to be worn on the clothing of Jewish persons could be directly compared to having that double vax certificate on your phone or in your wallet. You aren't vaxxed so you become untermenschen? You are now a part of society that is discriminated against! Simply because you don't want to be vaccinated?

This is also happening in Australia in two states. When QLD reaches 90% double vax then anyone unvaccinated will not be able to enter the state without going through some serious quarantine. They will then be barred from various establishments, including the local pub. The unvaxxed locals will be treated similarly. Constitutionally this is a major concern.

I have no issues with sitting next to an unvaxxed person. They are far more at risk than I am and that's their decision and I respect it. If I have caught Covid then I pose them a problem and not the other way around. I am double vaxxed and will get the booster next February.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 15, 2021, 03:57:18 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:30:57 AM
I don't know if locking down a ubiquitous group in a society is morally and politically more problematic than locking down a region. I need to think about it.

Really, the holocaust was "locking down" the Jews? Man, when you jump the rails, you jump the damn rails.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 15, 2021, 05:43:10 AM
Strangely, for some reason I only ever see people who are not Jewish (or Roma, etc) comparing restrictions on unvaccinated people to the Shoah. I wonder why that is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 15, 2021, 05:49:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 15, 2021, 12:42:00 AMUsually, totalitarianism creates and exploits fear in order to establish and keep itself in place.


An implication here is that the fear-mongering and hyperbole regarding Radical Islamic Terrorism are being recycled anew.  'Twas more or less always thus.  In the modern USA, the CPI set the pace, and its techniques are used to this very day. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 06:05:20 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 03:57:18 AM
Really, the holocaust was "locking down" the Jews? Man, when you jump the rails, you jump the damn rails.

Don't be silly. That's the sort of logic and argumentation that Trump people used to use. Come back to me when you're in a more rational frame of mind.

Quote from: amw on November 15, 2021, 05:43:10 AM
Strangely, for some reason I only ever see people who are not Jewish (or Roma, etc) comparing restrictions on unvaccinated people to the Shoah. I wonder why that is.

Nobody here as far as I know is comparing restrictions on unvaccinated people to killing however many people died in the Shoah. However I note that in passing that in Nazi Germany and maybe, interestingly, Austria,  Jewish people and others were

Quote from: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 09:04:35 AM
banned from restaurants and swimming pools, cinema, theatre, concerts, exhibitions, beaches and holiday resorts.

and this was

Quote from: Mandryka on November 14, 2021, 09:04:35 AM
monitored by the police.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 15, 2021, 06:15:05 AM
Quote from: Todd on November 15, 2021, 05:49:44 AM

An implication here is that the fear-mongering and hyperbole regarding Radical Islamic Terrorism are being recycled anew.  'Twas more or less always thus.

Yes, precisely, The enemy changes constantly, the methods are the same.

Quote
  In the modern USA, the CPI set the pace, and its techniques are used to this very day.

What is this CPI?



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on November 15, 2021, 07:05:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 06:05:20 AM
Don't be silly. That's the sort of logic and argumentation that Trump people used to use. Come back to me when you're in a more rational frame of mind.

Nobody here as far as I know is comparing restrictions on unvaccinated people to killing however many people died in the Shoah. However I note that in passing that in Nazi Germany and maybe, interestingly, Austria,  Jewish people and others were


and this was

Under the Reich Jews had no way of avoiding these restrictions. Under the present situation, the unvaxxed do have a way: get vaxxed.
This is a matter of making a choice for which there are consequences.

[Yes, I know there is a relatively small group who can't be vaccinated for valid medical reasons. But if it was only that group, there would probably be no need for these restrictions.]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 08:20:38 AM
Quote from: JBS on November 15, 2021, 07:05:57 AM
Under the Reich Jews had no way of avoiding these restrictions. Under the present situation, the unvaxxed do have a way: get vaxxed.
This is a matter of making a choice for which there are consequences.

[Yes, I know there is a relatively small group who can't be vaccinated for valid medical reasons. But if it was only that group, there would probably be no need for these restrictions.]

This is right.

The comparison with the Reich is designed to make people aware that Austria and maybe other western states could be sleepwalking not into a second Shoah, but into a highly authoritarian way of governing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 15, 2021, 08:21:11 AM
It's interesting because there is a potential comparison to make regarding the Shoah; specifically, Aktion T4 (the planned Nazi extermination of the elderly, disabled and otherwise "undesirable" via gassing, which was eventually forced to a halt by public protest and open revolt). A variety of events early in the pandemic suggest this comparison: COVID-19-positive patients being quarantined in nursing homes, where they were almost guaranteed to infect others, leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths; the U.S. government allowing the virus to spread unchecked on Native American reservations and, when asked for help, sending body bags instead of protective equipment; public statements by various economic and political authorities claiming that life didn't have much value anyway after age 75 and triage should focus on saving the youngest and healthiest patients rather than the most seriously ill; and of course widespread protests by ordinary citizens who claimed that since COVID-19 mostly killed people who were already old or sick, no restrictions were necessary, life should go back to normal, and nature should be allowed to take its course, etc. I rarely make this comparison because it's more plausible that most of these events were the result of ignorance or mistakes, rather than a deliberate extermination action. Anti-vaxxers rarely make this comparison because, of course, in this situation, they would be the Nazi analogues.

As for vaccination restrictions? I'm not sure how effective they would be for public health, given that most infection seems to occur within the household. The goal of any public health policy should be to protect people who are vulnerable to the virus even when vaccinated—since COVID-19 functions much more as an autoimmune disorder than a respiratory one, fully vaccinated cancer patients, transplant recipients, HIV-positive individuals, etc, are still at high risk because their immune responses are already dysregulated. As such an unvaccinated person can pose a threat to someone in this position, especially if they also refuse to wear masks or wash their hands etc (as many do). But vaccinated people can also transmit the virus to some extent, even if it's less likely. Possibly they think that if 95%+ of people become vaccinated the virus will simply become so rare that people will be safer by default, and the purpose of the restrictions is simply to encourage this. I have no idea how that will play out in reality, especially with the possibility of new variants; developing a new generation of vaccines that stimulate T cell response rather than antibody production seems more effective but is probably a few years away.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 15, 2021, 08:33:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 08:20:38 AM
This is right.

The comparison with the Reich is designed to make people aware that Austria and maybe other western states could be sleepwalking not into a second Shoah, but into a highly authoritarian way of governing.

Could be? It's already happened all across Europe and most people didn't even blink an eye. Governments and Big Pharma are greatly concerned about people's health and working hard to protect it so get the jabs, follow the orders and keep quiet, folks, or else you'll be placed under house arrest and police surveillance until you get the jab, follow the orders and keep quiet. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 15, 2021, 09:07:07 AM
In the United States the number of confirmed deaths due to Covid-19 is about 800,000. Epidemiologists think the real total is substantially higher. The preventable loss of life exceeds the deaths in WWII by a substantial amount. The urgency of this situation is comparable to war, and that means real war, not just bombing undeveloped countries who might have been involved in a terrorist attach.

In the case of war the government is embowered to draft people into the military, remove them from their homes and send them to a foreign country to kill people or be killed. I don't think it is unreasonable in this case of comparable urgency to require people to go to a pharmacy and receive a vaccination whose safety has been rigorously verified, although its long term efficacy is still in question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on November 15, 2021, 09:26:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.
Excellent Karl. I'm not eligible for several weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 09:40:26 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 15, 2021, 09:07:07 AM
In the United States the number of confirmed deaths due to Covid-19 is about 800,000. Epidemiologists think the real total is substantially higher. The preventable loss of life exceeds the deaths in WWII by a substantial amount. The urgency of this situation is comparable to war, and that means real war, not just bombing undeveloped countries who might have been involved in a terrorist attach.

In the case of war the government is embowered to draft people into the military, remove them from their homes and send them to a foreign country to kill people or be killed. I don't think it is unreasonable in this case of comparable urgency to require people to go to a pharmacy and receive a vaccination whose safety has been rigorously verified, although its long term efficacy is still in question.

Suppose the person who is required to take the vaccine decides that they would prefer not to, and does so understanding the risks to himself.  Am I right to think that in such a case the justification for the requirement would come from the harm they may do to others -- in particular, others who are vaccinated?

I am not saying a case can't be made, I just want to map out the logic of the situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 15, 2021, 10:24:39 AM
Quote from: amw on November 15, 2021, 08:21:11 AM
The goal of any public health policy should be to protect people who are vulnerable to the virus even when vaccinated—since COVID-19 functions much more as an autoimmune disorder than a respiratory one, fully vaccinated cancer patients, transplant recipients, HIV-positive individuals, etc, are still at high risk because their immune responses are already dysregulated. As such an unvaccinated person can pose a threat to someone in this position, especially if they also refuse to wear masks or wash their hands etc (as many do).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 15, 2021, 10:28:40 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.

Very nice. I don't think I'll need the booster shot, but I have urged my dad and mom both to get theirs as soon as they can.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 10:39:59 AM
Quote from: amw on November 15, 2021, 10:24:39 AM

The goal of any public health policy should be to protect people who are vulnerable to the virus even when vaccinated—since COVID-19 functions much more as an autoimmune disorder than a respiratory one, fully vaccinated cancer patients, transplant recipients, HIV-positive individuals, etc, are still at high risk because their immune responses are already dysregulated. As such an unvaccinated person can pose a threat to someone in this position, especially if they also refuse to wear masks or wash their hands etc (as many do).



I think this is a really hard thing. 100% protection is not possible without bringing things to a standstill. The vaccines mean that there is some protection. How to say how much protection is the right, optimum level?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 10:41:00 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on November 15, 2021, 10:28:40 AM
Very nice. I don't think I'll need the booster shot, but I have urged my dad and mom both to get theirs as soon as they can.

In the UK they are encouraging people over 40 to take a third shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 15, 2021, 11:44:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 09:40:26 AM
Suppose the person who is required to take the vaccine decides that they would prefer not to, and does so understanding the risks to himself.  Am I right to think that in such a case the justification for the requirement would come from the harm they may do to others -- in particular, others who are vaccinated?

I am not saying a case can't be made, I just want to map out the logic of the situation.

During the blitz of London people were required to observe blackout conditions, covering their windows with heavy curtains or keeping lights off. Suppose a person decides not to cover their windows because they prefer not to, and understand the risks to themselves from German bombers? Is that acceptable? No, it is not, because it subjects everyone in the area to increased risk from bombs.  There is ample evidence that vaccination reduces risk of illness and reduces transmission. Even a moderate decrease in transmission dramatically reduces the infection rate downstream. I don't feel comfortable with some of the draconian measures that have been proposed, but requiring public venues such as restaurants to require proof of vaccine status seems reasonable to me. Imposing a fine of $1,000 for someone who falsely claims vaccinated status in such circumstances seems reasonable to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 15, 2021, 12:06:17 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.

Excellent. I will get the booster as soon as I become eligible.
Just below current CDC guidelines at 64 years old, I expect Dec. 1 will be the date the guidelines change.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:19:23 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 15, 2021, 11:44:52 AM
During the blitz of London people were required to observe blackout conditions, covering their windows with heavy curtains or keeping lights off. Suppose a person decides not to cover their windows because they prefer not to, and understand the risks to themselves from German bombers? Is that acceptable? No, it is not, because it subjects everyone in the area to increased risk from bombs.  There is ample evidence that vaccination reduces risk of illness and reduces transmission. Even a moderate decrease in transmission dramatically reduces the infection rate downstream. I don't feel comfortable with some of the draconian measures that have been proposed, but requiring public venues such as restaurants to require proof of vaccine status seems reasonable to me. Imposing a fine of $1,000 for someone who falsely claims vaccinated status in such circumstances seems reasonable to me.

What's happening in Austria goes far beyond passports for large events. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go to McDs for a coffee and a slice of pie. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go away for the weekend, or drive to the beach for a walk, or go climb a mountain. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to take his child to the cinema. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go to a store to buy a magazine or a CD. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to visit his dear old grandma.

And the vaccinated population are encouraged to report the illegal behaviour of their unvaccinated neighbours to the police.

Listen to uncle Florestan. He knows - because he comes from a country which was, in very recent history, subject to a totalitarian police state. He knows how the people sleepwalked into it, step by step, one small step at a time, convinced it was a good thing for their safety. He knows that politics is all about controlling the population so as to maximise the profits of global companies. Any opportunity to increase their grip on how the people behave is something these politicians will grab.

And he knows that there's a real danger that we're doing the same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on November 15, 2021, 12:44:47 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 15, 2021, 12:06:17 PM
Excellent. I will get the booster as soon as I become eligible.
Just below current CDC guidelines at 64 years old, I expect Dec. 1 will be the date the guidelines change.

Same here. A booster shot should be available/allowed after Christmas. Regulations here stipulate that 6 months must have elapsed since shot # 2, which was June 25 in my case.

I got the regular flu shot last week. It was my first ever seasonal flu shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on November 15, 2021, 01:19:53 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 15, 2021, 12:06:17 PM
Excellent. I will get the booster as soon as I become eligible.
Just below current CDC guidelines at 64 years old, I expect Dec. 1 will be the date the guidelines change.

I too live in "rural upstate NY" and match your age. While taking my mother to a local pharmacy for her flu shot I got a booster shot. I told them I wasn't quite eligible and they didn't care. Said "We have an extra one, step back and roll up your sleeve."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on November 15, 2021, 05:21:05 PM
Got first shot. Didn't want to, though. Not too happy about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on November 15, 2021, 05:41:29 PM
Quote from: greg on November 15, 2021, 05:21:05 PM
Got first shot. Didn't want to, though. Not too happy about it.

Why did you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 15, 2021, 05:55:27 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 15, 2021, 06:15:05 AM
What is this CPI?


Committee on Public Information, the propaganda agency of the US Federal Government during the Great War. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 16, 2021, 01:10:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:19:23 PM
What's happening in Austria goes far beyond passports for large events. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go to McDs for a coffee and a slice of pie. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go away for the weekend, or drive to the beach for a walk, or go climb a mountain. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to take his child to the cinema. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to go to a store to buy a magazine or a CD. It is illegal for an unvaccinated person to visit his dear old grandma.

And the vaccinated population are encouraged to report the illegal behaviour of their unvaccinated neighbours to the police.

Oh, but that's nothing even remotely like, and nowhere even remotely near, the situation of the Jews in the selfsame Austria in the early 1940s, no, sir, not at all!

QuoteListen to uncle Florestan. He knows - because he comes from a country which was, in very recent history, subject to a totalitarian police state. He knows how the people sleepwalked into it, step by step, one small step at a time, convinced it was a good thing for their safety. He knows that politics is all about controlling the population so as to maximise the profits of global companies. Any opportunity to increase their grip on how the people behave is something these politicians will grab.

And he knows that there's a real danger that we're doing the same.

Thank you very much for this, I couldn't have put it better myself.

I don't expect to be taken seriously, though. What I do expect is to be labelled a conspiracy theorist, an anti-vaxxer and a Trumpist --- and this is also based on what I know.

(I know, for instance, how Communism was presented and taught in schools and universities as a scientifically-based doctrine and therefore it couldn't possibly be opposed but by either anti-science people or practitioners of the wrong kind of science, the bourgeois one.  And I know, for another instance, how the selfsame Communism was greatly concerned with, and working hard for, people's wellness and happiness and therefore only a deranged, egotistic and antisocial person could possibly oppose it --- ncidentally, this is why back then dissenters and opponents could be found both in prisons and psychiatric wards.)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 16, 2021, 01:11:34 AM
Quote from: Todd on November 15, 2021, 05:55:27 PM

Committee on Public Information, the propaganda agency of the US Federal Government during the Great War.

I see, thanks. Kind of The Ministry of Truth, right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 16, 2021, 04:15:55 AM
We're quickly approaching 4000 registered daily cases in DK, and 3% positive among tests, plus 3-10 daily fatalities. Before the vaccines, 4000 cases could mean up to 40 daily fatalities. A peak period has usually been for a couple of weeks so far, then going down again, yet the new restrictions are probably too soft, though the big increase in testing might also help. I had my first, mild cold/flu during corona in the weekend, after a lot of outdoor work, luckily the PCR was negative.

But regarding armchair politics ... what's not to like?

I'm glad I'm not a responsible politician facing the current dilemmas, especially in countries with more fatalities and low vaccination rates. Saving lives should be the primary thing, but it can also mean political suicide or have future consequences for democracy or civil rights, due to restrictions, accompanying dissatisfaction, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 16, 2021, 05:55:31 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.

Great news Karl!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 16, 2021, 07:27:48 AM
Excellent Karl!

Read this story this morning; it broke my heart.  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/three-snow-leopards-die-of-covid-19-at-nebraska-zoo/ar-AAQFMEB

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 16, 2021, 09:12:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:19:23 PM


Listen to uncle Florestan. He knows - because he comes from a country which was, in very recent history, subject to a totalitarian police state. He knows how the people sleepwalked into it, step by step, one small step at a time, convinced it was a good thing for their safety. He knows that politics is all about controlling the population so as to maximise the profits of global companies. Any opportunity to increase their grip on how the people behave is something these politicians will grab.



Quote from: Florestan on November 16, 2021, 01:10:41 AM


Thank you very much for this, I couldn't have put it better myself.


Is that really an accurate characterization of the rise of authoritarianism in Romania?

Could you really not have put it better?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 16, 2021, 10:05:13 AM
Pfizer will allow its COVID pill to be made and sold cheaply in poor countries
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 16, 2021, 10:08:34 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 16, 2021, 10:05:13 AM
Pfizer will allow its COVID pill to be made and sold cheaply in poor countries
Yeah!  Some good news!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on November 16, 2021, 11:09:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 15, 2021, 12:19:23 PM
Listen to uncle Florestan. He knows - because he comes from a country which was, in very recent history, subject to a totalitarian police state. He knows how the people sleepwalked into it, step by step, one small step at a time, convinced it was a good thing for their safety. He knows that politics is all about controlling the population so as to maximise the profits of global companies. Any opportunity to increase their grip on how the people behave is something these politicians will grab.

Everyone's deluded and paranoid uncles need to get some professional help. We're trying to have a civilization here. It's time for everyone to grow the f--k up and get vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 16, 2021, 12:06:30 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on November 16, 2021, 11:09:32 AM
Everyone's deluded and paranoid uncles need to get some professional help. We're trying to have a civilization here. It's time for everyone to grow the f--k up and get vaccinated.

If large numbers of people in definable social categories are, by failing to get vaccinated,  making dangerously wrong decisions based on bad information, then that's pretty obviously a failure of policy and comms before it's one of intelligence or maturity or personal responsibility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 16, 2021, 12:17:51 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 16, 2021, 12:06:30 PM
If large numbers of people in definable social categories are, by failing to get vaccinated,  making dangerously wrong decisions based on bad information, then that's pretty obviously a failure of policy and comms before it's one of intelligence or maturity or personal responsibility.



You're not reckoning on the robust disinformation ecosystem, and its target audience's imperviousness to fact. Under normal conditions, your observation had been germane.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on November 16, 2021, 12:50:31 PM
Quote from: BasilValentine on November 16, 2021, 11:09:32 AM
Everyone's deluded and paranoid uncles need to get some professional help. We're trying to have a civilization here. It's time for everyone to grow the f--k up and get vaccinated.
Why don't I force you to do something that you personally don't need to do, and threaten to take away your job that you've invested years in? Grow up! We are trying to have a hive mind civilization.

But seriously, I've wondered about the mentality of people that are totally fine with mandates and don't understand the pushback at all. My current guess is perhaps they've kissed ass their entire lives so much that they are desensitized to it and don't understand why others would have any qualms about doing the same.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 16, 2021, 01:36:11 PM
You do need to do it, and you're choosing to be fired.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 16, 2021, 03:09:16 PM
Quote from: greg on November 16, 2021, 12:50:31 PM
But seriously, I've wondered about the mentality of people that are totally fine with mandates and don't understand the pushback at all. My current guess is perhaps they've kissed ass their entire lives so much that they are desensitized to it and don't understand why others would have any qualms about doing the same.

That's what the nincompoops who refused to have their children vaccinated against measles were saying, I expect. Result: measles outbreaks in the 21st century.

So how do you arrive at the "expert opinion" that you don't need the vaccine?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 16, 2021, 09:16:07 PM
If this Guardian article is correct, parts of Germany are set to introduce discriminatory measures against those citizens who decline the vaccine. The article says that about whole 70% of the population is vaccinated - presumably more in vulnerable age groups.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/16/germany-set-to-tighten-rules-for-unvaccinated-as-covid-cases-rise
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 16, 2021, 10:02:22 PM
You're seeing only what you want to see in that article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 16, 2021, 10:41:51 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 16, 2021, 09:16:07 PM
If this Guardian article is correct, parts of Germany are set to introduce discriminatory measures against those citizens who decline the vaccine. The article says that about whole 70% of the population is vaccinated - presumably more in vulnerable age groups.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/16/germany-set-to-tighten-rules-for-unvaccinated-as-covid-cases-rise

The "2G" debate, also presently ongoing in the Netherlands, is about no longer excepting a 48 hrs negative test result to get into venues with restricted access (clubs, bars, restaurants, concerts). The other two grounds for access are full vaccination or recovery from the disease. For the unvaccinated the negative test result is, besides fraud, the only option to gain access to these venues. Note this is quite different from the "house arrest" that has been introduced in Austria.

The point is that several experts claim the switch from "3G" to "2G" would have a large impact on the infection rates. Which presents governments with a big dilemma. I'm guessing that vaccinating children under the age of 12 without any (individual) medical reason would also help a lot - but is that a more acceptable option?  ::) Or mandatory vaccinations?  ::)

We are running out of options.... and our societies have been taken hostage by a global collective antivax hysteria. People that have received dozens of vaccinations in their childhood to protect them against all kinds of diseases, are now raging against Covid vaccines and are cultivating paranoid conspiracy theories. I cannot believe my eyes and ears.

It's unfortunate, but when tough choices will have to be made it is not unreasonable to place more restrictions on those who choose not to be vaccinated. Not to deny them that freedom of choice, but because the consequences of that choice for others. Some people run significant health risks if they would get infected,  even if they are vaccinated. Others urgently need crucial medical treatments that cannot be given because of the excessive strain on the healthcare system.

One more thing. So when people contract a dangerous and contagious disease,  it is perfectly acceptable to restrict their freedom and place them in quarantine?  But restricting access by the unvaccinated to public social gatherings is an unacceptable violation of their rights?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 12:05:31 AM
Quote from: Que on November 16, 2021, 10:41:51 PM
The "2G" debate, also presently ongoing in the Netherlands, is about no longer excepting a 48 hrs negative test result to get into venues with restricted access (clubs, bars, restaurants, concerts). The other two grounds for access are full vaccination or recovery from the disease. For the unvaccinated the negative test result is, besides fraud, the only option to gain access to these venues. Note this is quite different from the "house arrest" that has been introduced in Austria.

The point is that several experts claim the switch from "3G" to "2G" would have a large impact on the infection rates. Which presents governments with a big dilemma. I'm guessing that vaccinating children under the age of 12 without any (individual) medical reason would also help a lot - but is that a more acceptable option?  ::) Or mandatory vaccinations?  ::)

We are running out of options.... and our societies have been taken hostage by a global collective antivax hysteria. People that have received dozens of vaccinations in their childhood to protect them against all kinds of diseases, are now raging against Covid vaccines and are cultivating paranoid conspiracy theories. I cannot believe my eyes and ears.

It's unfortunate, but when tough choices will have to be made it is not unreasonable to place more restrictions on those who choose not to be vaccinated. Not to deny them that freedom of choice, but because the consequences of that choice for others. Some people run significant health risks if they would get infected,  even if they are vaccinated. Others urgently need crucial medical treatments that cannot be given because of the excessive strain on the healthcare system.

One more thing. So when people contract a dangerous and contagious disease,  it is perfectly acceptable to restrict their freedom and place them in quarantine?  But restricting access by the unvaccinated to public social gatherings is an unacceptable violation of their rights?

The important question IMO is this: what level of serious illness is acceptable when the disease goes into epidemic phase? States need to fix that target number and then decide what to do to achieve it.


It's certainly true that if the choice really is between restricting all of society and restricting a group within the whole of society and restricting a geographic region in the society, the choices are difficult. I don't have a developed opinion about the issues, yet, I need more time to think.

I wonder to what extent these liberticide measures in Austria and Germany are designed to protect the unvaccinated against themselves, i.e. a totalitarian paternalistic conception of the role of the state.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 17, 2021, 07:28:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 12:05:31 AM
The important question IMO is this: what level of serious illness is acceptable when the disease goes into epidemic phase? States need to fix that target number and then decide what to do to achieve it.

Did you mean the endemic phase?
I don't think any level of serious ilness that results in hospital admission or long term incapacitation (long Covid) is acceptable if it can be avoided. And it can, by vaccination.

Now, what numbers of hospital/IC admissions (of mostly unvaccinated) are acceptable and would no longer justify general restrictions? Low enough not to block the health care system, I would say. Are we willing to pay for a structural increase of hospital and IC capacity?

But you keep sticking to the UK mantra "we cannot fight the virus, it will be amongst us forever".

The examples of Portugal and Spain prove that you can bring the infection rate down to a level in which it will (locally) die out, as long as a (very) high number of adults gets vaccinated (probably 90% and up). In such a scenario you keep periodically vaccinating those over 12 years and up to prevent a return of the disease, and counter local flare ups with a "track and trace" strategy.

Or we can thow our hands up in the air and keep filling these hospital beds....until everybody is either vaccinated, has gone through the disease or died. But how long will that take? And will a new virus strain makes us go through this entire mess all over again?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 17, 2021, 08:49:44 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 12:05:31 AM
I wonder to what extent these liberticide measures in Austria and Germany are designed to protect the unvaccinated against themselves, i.e. a totalitarian paternalistic conception of the role of the state.

I should think it's more: to protect them from each other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 17, 2021, 09:06:58 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 17, 2021, 08:49:44 AM
I should think it's more: to protect them from each other.
Krummholz,

I read this news today:  "Vermont and New Hampshire saw a 60% and 56% rise in coronavirus cases over the last two weeks, respectively. COVID-related deaths also increased by 52% in Vermont, which saw a new record high for its seven-day count on Saturday. The state now has a rolling average of 369 new daily cases, according to an NBC News analysis of coronavirus data."   :(

Ironically, I heard about it this morning on one of the morning talk shows in which they talked about Stephen Colbert's suggestion of how to deal with it--which did make me smile.  It starts at about 2:24 minutes in:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a0TIPfWYfw&list=PLiZxWe0ejyv9AYQeYIixmNtqsyAGJ6F2B&index=2

How are things in your neck of the woods these days?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 17, 2021, 09:07:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 12:05:31 AM
. I don't have a developed opinion about the issues, yet, I need more time to think.


Then please stop using terms like librticide and totalitarian paternalism. It makes it sound like your mind is closed and you're not thinking about this at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 17, 2021, 09:15:51 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 17, 2021, 09:07:34 AM
Then please stop using terms like librticide and totalitarian paternalism. It makes it sound like your mind is closed and you're not thinking about this at all.

Agitprop patois.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 09:41:40 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 17, 2021, 09:07:34 AM
Then please stop using terms like librticide and totalitarian paternalism. It makes it sound like your mind is closed and you're not thinking about this at all.

I think you're either seeking to gaslight the participants in the discussion or that you haven't thought about it yourself.  If something is liberticide that's what it is; if something is paternalist and totalitarian, that's what it is.

Where I am still unsure is whether this liberticide measure is morally justifiable, and whether paternal and totalitarian thinking is a justifiable approach for the state to take in these circumstances. But these measures are, I am sure, liberticide and paternalist and totalitarian.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 17, 2021, 09:15:51 AM
Agitprop patois.

No. Not patois.  And once again I see you're employing a method of arguing which I think is, quite frankly, shameful and contemptable. Deal with the issue rather than trying to sideline, cancel if you will, people who propose ideas which run counter to your prejudices.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 17, 2021, 12:42:16 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 09:41:40 AM
I think you're either seeking to gaslight the participants in the discussion or that you haven't thought about it yourself.  If something is liberticide that's what it is; if something is paternalist and totalitarian, that's what it is.

Where I am still unsure is whether this liberticide measure is morally justifiable, and whether paternal and totalitarian thinking is a justifiable approach for the state to take in these circumstances. But these measures are, I am sure, liberticide and paternalist and totalitarian.

No. Not patois.  And once again I see you're employing a method of arguing which I think is, quite frankly, shameful and contemptable. Deal with the issue rather than trying to sideline, cancel if you will, people who propose ideas which run counter to your prejudices.

Are you claiming that "liberticide" is standard English? It isn't. So why did you use it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 17, 2021, 12:56:33 PM
An old, mad, blind, despised, and dying King;
Princes, the dregs of their dull race, who flow
Through public scorn,—mud from a muddy spring;
Rulers who neither see nor feel nor know,
But leechlike to their fainting country cling
Till they drop, blind in blood, without a blow.
A people starved and stabbed in th' untilled field;
An army, whom liberticide and prey
Makes as a two-edged sword to all who wield;
Golden and sanguine laws which tempt and slay;
Religion Christless, Godless—a book sealed;
A senate, Time's worst statute, unrepealed—
Are graves from which a glorious Phantom may
Burst, to illumine our tempestuous day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 17, 2021, 01:39:15 PM
Can we just figure out how to be kind to one another here?  Yes, we have different views, news, experiences, etc., but we're all here for the music first of all.  And there are so many conflicting news sources and info that probably 99% of us don't truly understand what it means and what the best sources are for it?  And even, from what I can see, the experts are not always agreeing.  So, PLEASE, can we figure out how to be kind to one another?

Life is short....just a suggestion. 💔  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 17, 2021, 02:01:42 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 17, 2021, 01:47:28 PM
While I sympathize with the sentiment expressed here, I'm not aware of any recent instance of someone being unkind to someone else in this thread.
The last roughly half-dozen comments came across to me as being rather combative.  Plus, from what I recall, earlier ones too.

In any event, my point is that we're all in this together.  And, that we're here because we all care about classical music....and maybe cats too.  ;)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 17, 2021, 02:30:23 PM
"Can we figure out how to be kind to one another" has been entirely the point of the recent discussion.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on November 17, 2021, 03:38:16 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 16, 2021, 03:09:16 PM
That's what the nincompoops who refused to have their children vaccinated against measles were saying, I expect. Result: measles outbreaks in the 21st century.

So how do you arrive at the "expert opinion" that you don't need the vaccine?
English suck sometimes... do you mean me specifically, or people in general? Habla español?- se or yo? lol

It needs to be an individual's decision. I was not offered consent (threat of termination of employment doesn't fit under consent) for an irreversible medical procedure, which no one has any idea of the long-term effects of yet. I don't think there will be any, but why even risk it? Because my odds of getting Covid are low, and even in the unlikely scenario that I do, my odds of dying are super low considering my good health.

For most people, they should get it. Their situation is different from mine. But I would never force them to if I were in power. The worst part is just not being able to make your own choice for your own body. You wanna talk about feeling disempowered, that will do it.



Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 16, 2021, 03:09:16 PM
That's what the nincompoops who refused to have their children vaccinated against measles were saying, I expect. Result: measles outbreaks in the 21st century.
Children are naturally superspreaders, they can't avoid getting in people's faces. This doesn't quite relate to what I'm talking about, which is grownups that have the same lifestyle as me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 17, 2021, 04:02:40 PM
Quote from: greg on November 17, 2021, 03:38:16 PM
English suck sometimes... do you mean me specifically, or people in general? Habla español?- se or yo? lol

I don't think there will be any, but why even risk it? Because my odds of getting Covid are low, and even in the unlikely scenario that I do, my odds of dying are super low considering my good health.


You. Can. Still. Pass. It. On. To. Others. Who. may. Get. Very. Sick. Or. Die. Because. Of. Your. Selfish. Decision.

This. Is. Not. Just. About. You.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 03:12:53 AM
Austria decides to make vaccination obligatory from Feb.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/world-news/austria-lockdown-vaccine-mandatory-law-22211740
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 19, 2021, 03:51:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 03:12:53 AM
Austria decides to make vaccination obligatory from Feb.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/world-news/austria-lockdown-vaccine-mandatory-law-22211740

https://unherd.com/2021/11/inside-the-austrian-lockdown/ (https://unherd.com/2021/11/inside-the-austrian-lockdown/)

https://frenchdailynews.com/politics/3592-austria-rises-up-against-health-dictatorship (https://frenchdailynews.com/politics/3592-austria-rises-up-against-health-dictatorship)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 04:34:38 AM
I wonder what they plan to do with those who decline the vaccine after February.

The French news broadcast where I first heard about this liberticide move said that they claimed they had to do it because they have only vaccinated about 65% of the population. Is that right? And how is that vaccination distributed with respect to age and vulnerability?

I ask because in the Uk we have only a slightly higher rate than that, but we have a society free of restrictions and the situation is handleable and in fact seems to be stable, possibly getting better, in terms of prevalence. But we were very careful to prioritise vaccinations to older age groups.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on November 19, 2021, 04:58:14 AM
Quote from: greg on November 17, 2021, 03:38:16 PM
I was not offered consent (threat of termination of employment doesn't fit under consent) for an irreversible medical procedure, which no one has any idea of the long-term effects of yet.
In the long term you and we all will die. And somebody will surely blame it in long term effects of the vaccine, even after 20 years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on November 19, 2021, 05:08:04 AM
Quote from: greg on November 16, 2021, 12:50:31 PM
Why don't I force you to do something that you personally don't need to do, and threaten to take away your job that you've invested years in? Grow up! We are trying to have a hive mind civilization.

But seriously, I've wondered about the mentality of people that are totally fine with mandates and don't understand the pushback at all. My current guess is perhaps they've kissed ass their entire lives so much that they are desensitized to it and don't understand why others would have any qualms about doing the same.

You mean the hive mind that eliminated small pox from the planet? That cornered polio into a last stand in Pakistan? The one where everyone in their right mind has their children vaccinated against multiple diseases so they can go to school? The hive that listens to disinterested scientists offering objective evidence about a health crisis? I think you should be glad you've taken a reasonable step to protect your coworkers and others, even if you felt forced into it.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 05:14:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 04:34:38 AM
I wonder what they plan to do with those who decline the vaccine after February.

The French news broadcast where I first heard about this liberticide move said that they claimed they had to do it because they have only vaccinated about 65% of the population. Is that right? And how is that vaccination distributed with respect to age and vulnerability?

I ask because in the Uk we have only a slightly higher rate than that, but we have a society free of restrictions and the situation is handleable and in fact seems to be stable, possibly getting better, in terms of prevalence. But we were very careful to prioritise vaccinations to older age groups.

You seem to have the have the word "liberticide" stuck in your head. I hope you will consider letting go of this inflammatory term. No one is being put under restrictions that can't be immediately lifted by getting a vaccine which is widely available, free, has been thoroughly tested and proven safe, although its long-term effectiveness is unclear. Even in countries which have "liberty" citizens lose their liberty (are put in prison or worse) for conduct that endangers or harms others.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 05:20:15 AM
The vaccine "booster" is perhaps a poor description of the third dose. New data seems to indicate that a third dose after 6 months produces immunity that is stronger and more stable than the initial pair of doses 4 weeks apart.

(https://scontent.fhou1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/258538352_10162167997087580_2645361740513577960_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Y3qepH7SiGoAX8-C9lf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-1.fna&oh=40fab0e3d190b51c890a8dae197138e0&oe=619C229A)

This is not unusual. For vaccines given in childhood a second dose months or even years after the initial dose is proscribed for many vaccines.

This is what was missed from the prioritized release of the vaccines. They did not have time to establish the most effective dosing schedule.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 19, 2021, 06:08:03 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 05:20:15 AM
The vaccine "booster" is perhaps a poor description of the third dose. New data seems to indicate that a third dose after 6 months produces immunity that is stronger and more stable than the initial pair of doses 4 weeks apart.

(https://scontent.fhou1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/258538352_10162167997087580_2645361740513577960_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Y3qepH7SiGoAX8-C9lf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-1.fna&oh=40fab0e3d190b51c890a8dae197138e0&oe=619C229A)

This is not unusual. For vaccines given in childhood a second dose months or even years after the initial dose is proscribed for many vaccines.

This is what was missed from the prioritized release of the vaccines. They did not have time to establish the most effective dosing schedule.

The gap between doses 1 and 2 in this chart is actually 8 weeks. For me it was 12 weeks (Pfizer). Apparently those who got Astra-Zeneca vaccine will really benefit from dose 3. In Finland they are giving booster shots to those over 65 and what happens with people younger than that is to be seen. I has been almost 4 months from my dose 2.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 06:22:31 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 05:20:15 AM
The vaccine "booster" is perhaps a poor description of the third dose. New data seems to indicate that a third dose after 6 months produces immunity that is stronger and more stable than the initial pair of doses 4 weeks apart.

(https://scontent.fhou1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/258538352_10162167997087580_2645361740513577960_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Y3qepH7SiGoAX8-C9lf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-1.fna&oh=40fab0e3d190b51c890a8dae197138e0&oe=619C229A)

This is not unusual. For vaccines given in childhood a second dose months or even years after the initial dose is proscribed for many vaccines.

This is what was missed from the prioritized release of the vaccines. They did not have time to establish the most effective dosing schedule.

Can you give me a reference to this interesting find? If it turns out to be  three doses for lifetime protection (I think there is a vaccine like that) then that would be really good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 06:25:27 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 05:14:24 AM
You seem to have the have the word "liberticide" stuck in your head. I hope you will consider letting go of this inflammatory term. No one is being put under restrictions that can't be immediately lifted by getting a vaccine which is widely available, free, has been thoroughly tested and proven safe, although its long-term effectiveness is unclear. Even in countries which have "liberty" citizens lose their liberty (are put in prison or worse) for conduct that endangers or harms others.

To be frank, I think it's really important not to shy away from the political consequences of the epidemic -- people who weald power and influence aren't. I am someone who believes that the more woke we are, the better.

 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 07:20:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 06:25:27 AM
To be frank, I think it's really important not to shy away from the political consequences of the epidemic -- people who weald power and influence aren't. I am someone who believes that the more woke we are, the better.

I am not primarily concerned with public health officials having too much power. I am concerned with the transfer of wealth to the billionaire class. This includes amazon taking over the entire economy, the fact that Moderna is attempting to patent the mRNA vaccine as sole inventor when NIH scientists designed the core of the vaccine, the general decimation of small and medium size business at the expense of huge corporations, etc..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 19, 2021, 09:23:37 AM
 
Quote from: Spotted Horses on November 19, 2021, 07:20:05 AM
I am concerned with the transfer of wealth to the billionaire class. This includes amazon taking over the entire economy, the fact that Moderna is attempting to patent the mRNA vaccine as sole inventor when NIH scientists designed the core of the vaccine, the general decimation of small and medium size business at the expense of huge corporations, etc..


A phenomenon which had started long  before Covid but which got astronomic proportions precisely because lockdowns and restrictions. It's exactly the billionaires and the huge corporations that have been the beneficiaries of this crisis.

Three quarters of America's 722 billionaires are as rich, or richer, than they were before the pandemic—some by billions, tens of billions, or even more than one hundred billion dollars.

Billionaires aren't just richer since the pandemic began, there are also more of them. A record 493 new faces joined Forbes' World's Billionaires list this year—roughly one new billionaire every 17 hours between March 2020 and March 2021—including 98 newcomers from the U.S.

RTWTH: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2021/04/30/american-billionaires-have-gotten-12-trillion-richer-during-the-pandemic/?sh=bcc87c3f557e (https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2021/04/30/american-billionaires-have-gotten-12-trillion-richer-during-the-pandemic/?sh=bcc87c3f557e)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 19, 2021, 11:13:29 AM
If this is right there's a potential serious problem brewing in the UK

(https://i.ibb.co/4Yv4gx1/Capture.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 12:00:27 AM
Injuries reported after Dutch police fire warning shots during Rotterdam protest over Covid-19 measures

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/19/europe/police-fire-warning-shots-rotterdam-intl/index.html (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/19/europe/police-fire-warning-shots-rotterdam-intl/index.html)

Rotterdam police open fire as Covid protest turns violent

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/the-netherlands-rotterdam-police-open-fire-as-covid-protest-turns-violent (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/the-netherlands-rotterdam-police-open-fire-as-covid-protest-turns-violent)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 12:29:47 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 12:00:27 AM
Injuries reported after Dutch police fire warning shots during Rotterdam protest over Covid-19 measures

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/19/europe/police-fire-warning-shots-rotterdam-intl/index.html (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/19/europe/police-fire-warning-shots-rotterdam-intl/index.html)

Rotterdam police open fire as Covid protest turns violent

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/the-netherlands-rotterdam-police-open-fire-as-covid-protest-turns-violent (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/the-netherlands-rotterdam-police-open-fire-as-covid-protest-turns-violent)

In all honesty, I can't blame this on anti vaxxers... These are mostly hooligans

Though there is some connection: a lot of poorly educated, disenfranchised youngsters refuse to be vaccinated - just because the government tells them that they should...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 12:31:23 AM
It's a well-known pattern.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 12:40:54 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 12:29:47 AM
These are mostly hooligans

I haven't been there so I can't comment. Your being Dutch, possibly even an eyewitness, puts you in a much better position to know. I can't help noticing, though, that in December 1989, after anti-Communist protests and riots broke out in the city of Timișoara and the police and the military opened fire, injuring and killing hundreds,  Ceaușescu appeared on TV and announced that hooligans devastated the city.  :D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 12:58:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 12:34:50 AM
Is that profile also true of the people who decline the vaccine, as opposed to the people who demonstrate on the streets about it? I mean are Dutch vaccine refuses made up of the poorly educated, the disenfranchised, the young?

It appears there are roughly three groups:

1) Low education & young - others with low education that are older seem to trust the govt.
2) The affluent upper (middle) class hippy-dippies. The do gooders with luxurious life styles that think they live environmentally friendly and revere Rufolf Steiner.
3) The traditional anti vaxxers for religious reasons. Though a lot of ultra orthodox protestants emigrated to for instance the US (good luck with that...), we still have some left. Even though the good Lord hasn't protected them from the occasional polio outbreak in the past, they stick to their opposition against vaccination. And because this is a small group the govt has traditionally let them be.

So what we see here is: a lack of trust in government, a lack of trust in (convential) medical science, or trust in a higher power.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 01:12:46 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 12:40:54 AM
I haven't been there so I can't comment. Your being Dutch, possibly even an eyewitness, puts you in a much better position to know. I can't help noticing, though, that in December 1989, after anti-Communist protests and riots broke out in the city of Timișoara and the police and the military opened fire, injuring and killing hundreds,  Ceaușescu appeared on TV and announced that hooligans devastated the city.  :D

Well, I can't help but notice that sometimes - and in properly functioning democracies (you can exclude the US here...) most of the times - riots are actually conducted by hooligans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 01:21:14 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 12:58:13 AM
It appears there are roughly three groups:

1) Low education & young - others with low education that are older seem to trust the govt.
2) The affluent upper (middle) class hippy-dippies. The do gooders with luxurious life styles that think they live environmentally friendly and revere Rufolf Steiner.
3) The traditional anti vaxxers for religious reasons. Though a lot of ultra orthodox protestants emigrated to for instance the US (good luck with that...), we still have some left. Even though the good Lord hasn't protected them from the occasional polio outbreak in the past, they stick to their opposition against vaccination. And because this is a small group the govt has traditionally let them be.

So what we see here is: a lack of trust in government, a lack of trust in (convential) medical science, or trust in a higher power.

What about pregnant women? And people who decline the vaccine on behalf of their teenage kids? These are significant elements in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 01:26:30 AM
There's a 2B (or 4) too - neo-liberal, usually relatively young and ~immortal people, who are sure of their own strength and path to success in society, not at least economically, and hostile to the state generally in relation to their project. But they're mostly not the types engaging in demonstrations that get rough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 01:32:32 AM
Florestan, Lukashenko and Putin have been using such language about opponents too. But the Dutch multi-party government coalition probably doesn't represent the same monolithic, long-lasting dictatorship ruthlessness.

Your priorities are ... unorthodox. What is the alternative suggestion for Romania then, considering the average of 302 fatalities per day for a week in population of less than 20 mio, a vaccination rate of 37%, and the medical services asking for international help.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 03:07:34 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 01:32:32 AM
Florestan, Lukashenko and Putin have been using such language about opponents too. But the Dutch multi-party government coalition probably doesn't represent the same monolithic, long-lasting dictatorship ruthlessness.

Your priorities are ... unorthodox. What is the alternative suggestion for Romania then, considering the average of 302 fatalities per day for a week in population of less than 20 mio, a vaccination rate of 37%, and the medical services asking for international help.

I just note in passing that neither Austria nor Holland appears to be in such a bad place, if you look at the % vaccinated figure. But that brute figure could be hiding a lot of worrying details. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 04:13:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 01:21:14 AM
What about pregnant women? And people who decline the vaccine on behalf of their teenage kids? These are significant elements in the UK.

Pregnant wome have indeed been reluctant out of concern for their unborn baby. And they are now targeted by special information campaigns. But in numbers how can this be significant? Teenagers do not always agree with their parents, and under Dutch law they are allowed to make their own decision. Again, in numbers this is hardly significant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 05:15:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 03:07:34 AM
I just note in passing that neither Austria nor Holland appears to be in such a bad place, if you look at the % vaccinated figure. But that brute figure could be hiding a lot of worrying details.

Concerning Romania's low vaccination rate, it's not that vaccines aren't available, or governmental opposition, at least on a national level. It's due to vaccine scepticism, and apparently some secludedness/slowness of rural areas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 05:16:15 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 01:32:32 AM
Your priorities are ... unorthodox. What is the alternative suggestion for Romania then, considering the average of 302 fatalities per day for a week in population of less than 20 mio, a vaccination rate of 37%, and the medical services asking for international help.

I'm glad you brought up the case of Romania. Let me explain you what is going here in some details that probably the Danish / Dutch / whatever media don't mention. 

I'll begin by saying that the current situation is the result of several factors, first and foremost the government grossly mismanaging the crisis and the bad state of the healthcare system long before the pandemic.

Let's start with the latter. Long before Covid, most hospitals were decades old, underfunded, underequipped, understaffed and overcrowded. Long before Covid, many people in hospitals died not because of whatever treatable disease they had but because of lack of drugs, medical equipment and, especially, nosocomial infections --- which at some point the media reported at a rate of one p. Long before Covid, hospitals lacked personnel, because wages being very low and conditions being dire, many doctors and nurses emmigrated to Western Europe. Long before Covid, many hospitals, especially in small towns and rural areas, were simply shut down, thus depriving whole regions of any specialized healthcare other than general practitioners, who were often one doctor in charge of several small towns and rural communes. In short, long before Covid the Romanian healthcare system was disastruous --- to the point that presidents, prime-ministers, politicians (including health ministers) and businessmen, ie the powerful and the rich, went abroad for treatment.

Now, let's turn to governmental action.

For better or worse, at the beginning of June, 2021 the number of recorded infections plummeted, the number of severe cases plummeted, the number of critical, ICU cases plummeted, Covid-dedicated hispitals were mostly empty and many doctors openly demanded that they (the hospitals, that is) be opened again for other diseases. (FYI, in 2020 an unprecedented percentage of roughly 65% of registered cancer patients died, a monstrosity clearly attributable to the fact that they'd been denied hospital access and treatment.)

The president and the prime-minister then quickly jumped on TV channels and announced live: "The vaccination campaign was a huge success! We have basically stopped the pandemic!". The vaccination rate back then was about 30%.

During the whole months between June and September the government did absolutely nothing in order to prepare for the fourth wave; zero anti-virals and ventilators bought, zero ICU supplementary beds --- nothing at all but triumphalist rhetoric as noted above. What they did instead was allowing huge music festival, tens of thousands of attendees, to take place in several cities; they allowed the beaches to be flooded by people; they basically lifted all restrictions; and the main ruling party organized in September a huge, triumphalistic congress, 5000 attendees.

Now given all of the above, I ask you: (1) what else was to be expected other than what followed? and (2) can you blame the people for not trusting the selfsame government when, late in September, they began a furibund campaign to convince people to get vaccinated? The selfsame government that declared the vaccination succesful and the pandemic stopped suddenly changed position and began to coerce people into vaccination (there are several restrictions for the unvaccinated, more on that below). You might find this normal, but I don't.

Anyway, during the last week the numbers plummeted again. The situation in Romania right now while I'm typing is far better than it was a month ago and probably far better than in Austria or The Netherlands. And, according to the most respected Romanian epidemiologist, if to the currently around 40% vaccination rate one adds all people who recovered from Covid (yours truly, my wife and in-laws included) or who didn't even know they had it because they were asymptomatic, and therefore have acquired natural immunity, the real rate of immunity is possibly around 60 %.

Now, let's address the restrictions themselves. In order to understand my position and that of the vast majority of Romanians, you should keep in mind that Romania is a country in which for decades long the government tried to make people happy by force, for decades long the most basic rights and freedoms were trampled under foot under the common good pretext and denied especially to those who did not conform to the official ideology. We had a bloody revolution in which people died in order that never again the government could do that. The Romanian Constitution and several ordinary laws expressly prohibit some rights from being suspended under any circumstance whatsoever, among them the right to work (which is now under threat by the Covid Pass) the right to assembly and the right to free speech. Therefore any and all regulations which in any way suspend and restrict them are unconstitutional and illegal. Furthermore, the Law of Public Health expressly states that no medical treatment is mandatory and must be administered only with the free and informed consent of the patient. Therefore, any and all forcing of vaccination on people who do not consent to be vaccinated (for instance by making vaccination a condition for being allowed to work) is illegal. For decades we have had a bad, corrupt and tyrannical government that tried to make us happy by force and against our will; now we have a bad and corrupt government that tries to make us healthy by force and against our will and which is increasingly tyrannical in their actions. Is it any wonder that people distrust them massively?

As for the vaccines themselves, their safety and efficiency, their being thoroughly and properly tested --- I will refrain from commenting on these issues, although my opinion is fully formed and based on (1) publicly available scientific data and information, including but not limited to, such sources as the WHO, CDC and FDA, and (2) logic and common sense. I will just humbly presume that having known me for some long years you guys will not accuse me of being an uneducated, irrational, anti-vaxxer loon. (FWIW, my 8-yo son is vaccinated with all mandatory vaccines plus several of the recommended ones.)

There, hope this helps.

Best wishes to all of you and stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on November 20, 2021, 05:16:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 03:07:34 AM
I just note in passing that neither Austria nor Holland appears to be in such a bad place, if you look at the % vaccinated figure. But that brute figure could be hiding a lot of worrying details.

Indeed, there can be wild disparities within communities, urban vs rural areas, also socio-economic, ethnic, educational factors working for or against vaccination/health measures. A countrywide 64% vaccination rate can hide disparities and potential hot spots for the virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
Florestan, thank you for those details, including the criticism of former government policies.

As regards the virus situation in Austria and the Netherlands, it's better regarding fatalities (average daily in the latest week 44 and going up, and 29 going up, population sizes 9 and 18 mio), concerning further details, one would have to investigate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 05:40:20 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 05:24:15 AM
Florestan, thank you for those details, including the criticism of former government policies.

You're welcome.

The problem is, the former government is going to be half of the future government.

I will state it bluntly: for perfectly rational and reasonable historical reasons trust in government have always been low in Romania, even prior to the Communist takeover but nowadays it is probably at the historical lowest. I have myself lost any trust whatsoever in any single one of the mainstream political parties and I will never ever again vote for any of them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 05:50:34 AM
I suppose distrust in medical expertise on a local level is intertwined with the disbelief in authorities then, cf. for example the collective pro-vaccine appeal from Bucharest doctors from October 13th.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 05:52:29 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 04:13:32 AM
Pregnant wome have indeed been reluctant out of concern for their unborn baby. And they are now targeted by special information campaigns. But in numbers how can this be significant? Teenagers do not always agree with their parents, and under Dutch law they are allowed to make their own decision. Again, in numbers this is hardly significant.

Not significant in numbers probably, but it shows something very significant -- pregnant women and parents are not groups which can easily be be dismissed, pilloried and vilified in a populist way. No-one's going to say of pregnant women "Anti-vaxx morons! Time to round 'em an put 'em in camps."  They show that we have large numbers of people in definable social categories which are making decisions based on bad information -- and that's a failure of something -- government probably.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 05:56:15 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 05:50:34 AM
the collective pro-vaccine appeal from Bucharest doctors from October 13th.

What is your source for that? I live (mostly) in Bucharest, I read newspapers and watch TV channels daily, both mainstream and independent, yet I have never heard of it before.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 06:02:03 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 04:13:32 AM
Pregnant wome have indeed been reluctant out of concern for their unborn baby. And they are now targeted by special information campaigns.

Pregnancy

There is limited experience with use of Comirnaty in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate
direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or
post-natal development (see section 5.3). Administration of Comirnaty in pregnancy should only be
considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus



Source: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf)


Pregnancy

There is limited experience with use of Spikevax in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate
direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or
post-natal development (see section 5.3). Administration of Spikevax in pregnancy should only be
considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.


Source: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_en.pdf (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_en.pdf)



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 06:12:24 AM
Quote from: André on November 20, 2021, 05:16:22 AM
Indeed, there can be wild disparities within communities, urban vs rural areas, also socio-economic, ethnic, educational factors working for or against vaccination/health measures. A countrywide 64% vaccination rate can hide disparities and potential hot spots for the virus.

I was thinking more of age. One strength of the UK is that there is a very high vaccination rate among older cohorts -- i.e. the most vulnerable age groups. So here a 70% vaccination rate translates into excellent level of protection against severe illness because it is in fact 90%+  vaccinated for those who are most likely to get severely ill. I don't know what the data for vaccination rates by age looks like in other European countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:13:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 05:56:15 AM
What is your source for that? I live (mostly) in Bucharest, I read newspapers and watch TV channels daily, both mainstream and independent, yet I have never heard of it before.

I don't know the media situation in Romania, but normally such an appeal should be told about, at least in some media. Sources:
apnews.com, web article October 13th:
"Romanian doctors issue 'cry of despair' amidst virus surge" , by Stephen McGrath.

medicalnewstoday.com, web article October 29th: "Covid-19 in Romania - Doctors plea for help in open letter", by Erika Watts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 06:14:24 AM
To give you a striking example of Romanian politics.

The Covid Pass bill, submitted by the current, caretaker National Liberal Party government (NLP being a party within EPP) was killed in the Senate by the Social-Democratic Party (member of the PES), yet not, as one would have hoped, as a matter of principle, but as a blackmailing tool in order to force the the NL to ally themselves with the SD --- and now that the alliance is virtually agreed upon, lo and behold! the SDP announced they will vote the bill in the Chamber of Deputies, albeit in a modified form --- and I hasten to add, modified for better and rationally, a thing that only 2 years ago I would have never said about the SDP.   :o

And you want me to trust such parties and the government thereof with handling my and my family's health? Over my dead body!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 06:33:59 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:13:05 AM
I don't know the media situation in Romania, but normally such an appeal should be told about, at least in some media. Sources:
apnews.com, web article October 13th:
"Romanian doctors issue 'cry of despair' amidst virus surge" , by Stephen McGrath.

medicalnewstoday.com, web article October 29th: "Covid-19 in Romania - Doctors plea for help in open letter", by Erika Watts.

Thank you for the link. I was able to identify the original Romanian link: https://www.cmb.ro/strigat-de-disperare/ (https://www.cmb.ro/strigat-de-disperare/).

The appeal is signed by the President of the Bucharest College of Physicians "on behalf of its Executive Bureau".

This means nothing. I can think of several instances of certified members of the BCP who have dissenting, if not downright opposing views, one of them being my very own GP, a retired army doctor with the rank of colonel.

Be it as it might, I tell you once again and in all honesty that, although I consider myself a very informed person, I have never ever heard of this appeal before --- and be it noted that most TV channels and newspapers lose no opportunity to promote vaccination as the sole and only way to end the pandemic.

Btw, I have a question for you all.

Ever since the pandemic started, no relatives or friends have been allowed to visit the patients, even if patients were admitted in hospitals for diseases other than Covid-19. For instance, my father-in-law was twice in hospital since March, 2020 for a disease not even remotely related to Covid-19 and he was tested negatively every single time they tested him --- and nobody, not even his wife and daughter, was allowed to visit him. Total quarantine, due of Covid-19 pandemic. Yet each evening on every TV channels we are presented with reporters freely filming on hospital locations, mostly Covid-19 ICUs (!), interviewing people which are visibly in distress, some connected to ventilators. How ethical and humane is this?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 06:34:21 AM
A small victory against disinformation in Texas: Texas court says hospital can't be forced to offer ivermectin to covid patient on ventilator
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:44:29 AM
The hospital discrepancy of course sounds unethical, especially if the reporters are relatively unprotected, or the sick people aren't specifically insisting on telling their story to the media.

In DK we've only had interviews after sickness, or with family members, or with doctors on or after work. Pictures of people in hospital are very few and I think normally non-identifiable, they then use them as stock photos.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 06:46:04 AM
Austria becomes Europe's first country to demand vaccination for all

By Loveday Morris and Denise Hruby

Yesterday at 1:32 p.m. EST

BERLIN — Austria on Friday became the first country in Europe to say it will mandate the coronavirus vaccine for everyone eligible, as it reimposed a nationwide lockdown amid a surge in infections that has gripped parts of Europe.

Austria's announcement comes as countries across Europe grapple with how to deal with rising coronavirus cases as winter sets in — and with people weary and frustrated after vaccinations had raised hope of an end to restrictions.

The World Health Organization said Tuesday that Europe was the world's only region with coronavirus deaths on the rise, jumping by 5 percent since earlier this month.

Vaccination rates range widely across Europe — from more than 80 percent in parts of Western Europe to under 30 percent in places such as Bulgaria — while some countries including France and Italy have expanded rules that sharply limit workplace and social options for the unvaccinated.

But the move by Austria — with a fully vaccinated level of about 64 percent — pushes into full-mandate territory that other countries in the West have so far resisted because of worries of public backlash and other potential challenges.

"We now have to face reality," Austria's chancellor, Alexander Schallenberg, told reporters in Vienna. From February, vaccines will be required for everyone, he said, without giving details of what would be the minimum age.

Recent scenes from hospitals in parts of Austria have been reminiscent of the early days of the pandemic, with doctors preparing to make difficult life-or-death decisions on who they have the capacity to treat.

In one hospital in Upper Austria — an area on the Bavarian border and one of the hardest-hit provinces of the country — bodies were being piled up in the corridors, according to Austrian media reports.

Schallenberg said that introducing the new measures was not an "easy decision" but it was based on infection levels and "to protect all of us."

Austria's rate for fully vaccinated people is just 1 percentage point below the average across the European Union, but higher than the rate of 59 percent in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

There has been political resistance to imposing a vaccine mandate in Austria. But experts said they saw little potential for pushback on legal grounds over the mandate.

"In this current situation, things are so dramatic, catastrophic even, that there won't be any constitutional issues for a vaccine mandate," said Heinz Mayer, a constitutional expert and former dean of the law faculty of the University of Vienna.

"We've never had such a dramatic situation. Each day, dozens of people are dying, unnecessarily. It's out of control," he added.

Meanwhile, Austria's new lockdown begins Monday. Nonessential businesses will close, and residents will be asked not to leave home except for reasons such as going grocery shopping or visiting a doctor.

The new restrictions were an "enormous" thing to ask of the vaccinated population, but too many people "showed a lack of solidarity," said Schallenberg, who took over as chancellor last month after fellow conservative party-member Sebastian Kurz was forced to resign.

Austria's famed Christmas markets, some of which had just opened for the season, will be forced to shut down. The new restrictions will be reevaluated after 10 days and, after 20 days, could revert to a lockdown only on the unvaccinated.

Other measures, such as imposing a lockdown only on the unvaccinated earlier this week, have not sufficiently increased vaccination rates, the chancellor said. And infection numbers have continued to rise.

The seven-day incidence rate — the number of infections per 100,000 residents over the past week — rose to 991 as of Wednesday in Austria, almost doubling from two weeks earlier. The U.S. seven-day new case rate on Wednesday was fewer than 200 per 100,000, according to the CDC.

One doctor interviewed by the public television reminded viewers that, at the beginning of the pandemic, Austria took on patients from France's overburdened intensive care units. He said he was now hoping the French would reciprocate.

"We have to undertake hard measures, otherwise the health-care system will collapse," said Günther Platter, the governor of Austria's Tyrol region, who spoke at the same news conference with the chancellor.

Platter said the vaccine mandate is the only way to break the "vicious cycle" of surging infections and lockdowns.

It's unclear whether other countries will follow suit.

Italy has floated the idea of a full vaccine mandate but has so far stopped short of imposing one. In October, the country introduced a stringent workplace rule that requires all employees, in both the public and private sectors, to show a health pass to prove they are vaccinated against the coronavirus or have recovered or tested negative.

But a nationwide mandate in Italy remains an option, according to one government official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk candidly about the deliberations.

"Making anything mandatory is never nice," he said. "But it's a tool we have and can be used under extreme circumstances."

In France, vaccination is now mandatory for nurses, firefighters and in some other professions. Belgium earlier this week ordered employees to work from home four days out of five.

In neighboring Germany, where coronavirus rates have broken all-time records in recent days, the government has refrained from introducing vaccine mandates for any parts of the population and has said there will not be a lockdown for the vaccinated.

Still, new regional measures are being introduced in Germany. The southern state of Bavaria announced restrictions Friday, which will include contact restrictions for the unvaccinated and an order for restaurants and bars to close in hot-spot areas.

As of Monday in Berlin, only those residents who are vaccinated or have recovered can go to restaurants or bars.

In the early days of the pandemic in Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel assured citizens that vaccinations would not become mandatory. Some analysts believe such mandates can backfire and invigorate anti-vaccine movements, which have been particularly active in Germany.

But serious legal challenges to vaccination mandates have so far been limited.

Last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that compulsory vaccinations could be "deemed necessary in a democratic society."

The case had been lodged by families in the Czech Republic whose children were denied entry to school because they weren't vaccinated against diseases including measles, but legal experts said it could also be applied to coronavirus. "It's extremely frustrating, just very, very frustrating," said Konstanze Castaneda, 41, who works in film production. "But mostly I'm frustrated with the unvaccinated. They had a choice and we could have avoided all of this."

On the streets of Vienna, residents voiced exasperation at a new lockdown. At a traditional Christmas market outside the Hofburg, the former imperial palace of the Habsburg dynasty, Haelnur Deren, 21, wondered what they'd do with their stocks of heart-shaped gingerbread.

"It won't go bad right away, but who is going to buy gingerbread after Christmas?" she said. The lockdown for the unvaccinated was "pointless" she said. Questioning whether anyone would have stuck to it.

Hruby reported from Vienna. Stefano Pitrelli in Rome contributed to this report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 20, 2021, 06:46:59 AM
Austria to go into full lockdown as Covid surges (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59343650)

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/3BF7/production/_121615351_jh_cases_rate_timeseries_selected_countries_19nov-nc.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 06:51:29 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:44:29 AM
The hospital discrepancy of course sounds unethical, especially if the reporters are relatively unprotected, or the sick people aren't specifically insisting on telling their story to the media.

The reporters wear a mask and that's all, and they are literally invading patients' private space. And the bitter irony is that in one such instance, the reporter announced beforehand that most infected people are not vaccinated and then proceeded to ask people in wards about their vaccination status only to find out that 2 of the 3 people interviewed were doubly vaccinated... I kid you not, I can look for the whole recorded thing and post it here, if you wish.

Now, the media is the media, they thrive on the sensational and would hang their own mothers in other to get higher ratings. But what about the managers of those hospitals, who allow such circus shows? Are they not bound by any ethical principle? Are they not responsible to their patients? Have they no moral sense whatsoever? My only educated guess is that indeed they are not and they have not.

QuoteIn DK we've only had interviews after sickness, or with family members, or with doctors on or after work. Pictures of people in hospital are very few and non-identifiable.

Seems very reasonable to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:56:52 AM
Well, it seems that some of the journalists aren't up to a good standard. I just read numbers from Romania, that the far majority of serious cases are non-vaccinated. On Nov. 2nd, it was 541 out of 591 fatalities, the authorities said.

But btw, Spain, Portugal and Italy have been continually mentioned here in DK lately, for their current, better status - due to a less hastened loosening of mask use, and the retaining of some restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 07:06:17 AM
'Still in a purgatory.' COVID numbers have risen in Mass. ahead of holidays and winter weather

Few believe the virus will be eradicated so the focus is learning how to live with risk of infections for the foreseeable future.

By Kay Lazar Globe Staff, Updated November 19, 2021, 7:08 p.m.

The numbers are ominous. And they're coming just as families prepare to gather for what they hoped would be a return to more normal Thanksgiving traditions.

Yet in the last week, COVID-19 cases in Massachusetts have risen to levels not seen since last February. Hospitalizations have edged up, too. In European countries such as Austria — with higher vaccination rates than the United States — soaring infection rates have led to nationwide lockdowns and vaccination mandates.

How should Massachusetts residents, who have adhered better than most of their fellow citizens to public health recommendations, react to these new numbers?

"We are still in a purgatory, unfortunately, and no one wants to hear it, but we have to double down on our public health commitment," said Dr. Howard Koh, a former Massachusetts health commissioner and now a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

The latest state data show the seven-day average of new COVID cases has shot up 78 percent since Nov. 1, from 1,187 to 2,114. Hospitalizations have risen more slowly. They were up 26 percent during that same time period, to 663 on Friday.

The highest rates of infection now are among children 5 to 9 years old, the group most recently eligible for COVID shots. They account for 17 percent of cases in the past two weeks but make up just 5 percent of the population.

Still, there is one fact that brings hope: We are in a much safer place than a year ago now that we have vaccines, booster shots, and treatments to stave off the virus's most powerful punch, say many public health experts.

National COVID-19 forecasts, including the widely followed University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation model, project fewer cases, deaths, and hospitalizations in Massachusetts this winter than last winter.

As more Americans have gained protection against COVID-19, public health recommendations have loosened. A year ago, the message was clear: To flatten the rise in deadly cases, stay home. If you must go out, wear a mask. Today, medical specialists are no longer advising people to hunker down and avoid travel or family over the holidays, but rather to take reasonable precautions, get vaccinated, and consider infection rates in the community where they might be headed.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 07:14:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:56:52 AM
Well, I just read numbers from Romania, that the far majority of serious cases are non-vaccinated.

Even if that were so, how can one force people to be healthy against their will, except by reverting to totalitarian measures? The Romanian Constitution states clearly that health is a right. Now it has suddenly turned into an obligation --- without anyone having elected anybody to amend the said Constitution.

Are you really not at all concerned about fracturing society along vaccination lines and creating a whole class of untermenschen, ie the unvaccinated, who are blamed for all the evils befelling on the vaccinated and who should be excluded as far as possible from the society? Does it really not at all frighten you the thought that this situation could be the basis for policy-making in years to come? I sincerely doubt it, or at least I want to sincerely doubt it.

QuoteBut btw, Spain, Portugal and Italy have been continually mentioned here in DK lately, for their current, better status - due to a less hastened loosening of mask use, and the retaining of some restrictions.

I am not opposed to mask use and to some common-sense restrictions --- but I am firmly opposed to turning vaccination and restrictions into principles on which society should be ordered until there will be not one single Covid-19 case recorded anymore, ie until Kingdom Come.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 07:15:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 06:56:52 AM
Well, it seems that some of the journalists aren't up to a good standard.

Now, the media is the media, they thrive on the sensational and would hang their own mothers in other to get higher ratings. But what about the managers of those hospitals, who allow such circus shows? Are they not bound by any ethical principle? Are they not responsible to their patients? Have they no moral sense whatsoever? My only educated guess is that indeed they are not and they have not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 07:37:17 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 07:15:22 AM
Now, the media is the media, they thrive on the sensational and would hang their own mothers in other to get higher ratings. But what about the managers of those hospitals, who allow such circus shows? Are they not bound by any ethical principle? Are they not responsible to their patients? Have they no moral sense whatsoever? My only educated guess is that indeed they are not and they have not.

It would be interesting to know more about  where there is such a pattern, and to what extent, and where not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 07:41:05 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 05:52:29 AM
Not significant in numbers probably, but it shows something very significant -- pregnant women and parents are not groups which can easily be be dismissed, pilloried and vilified in a populist way. No-one's going to say of pregnant women "Anti-vaxx morons! Time to round 'em an put 'em in camps."  They show that we have large numbers of people in definable social categories which are making decisions based on bad information -- and that's a failure of something -- government probably.

[I am responding to Florestan as well.]

It is evident that there can be legitimate reasons not be vaccinated. Hence, not everybody that doesn't want to be vaccinated is an "anti-vaxxer".  In most cases this relates to a severely compromised immune system and/or a very frail physical condition. The best protection for this group of people is that everbody else is vaccinated.

Pregnancy. No, there is no (not yet) "100% proof" that it is safe.  But is is extremely rare that a (any) vaccination affects a pregnancy. It is clear however that a situation in which pregnant woman will develop a severe case of Covid, will lead to dangerous complications. The advice to pregnant women is therefore to get vaccinated. Sofar no cases of vaccine related complications (specific to pregnancy) are known. There are no certainties, but the risk assessment seems pretty straight forward to me. And again: if everybody else would be vaccinated, this dilemma wouldn't  exist.

Misinformation can be adressed; lack in trust is a problem that is harder to solve...

BTW Who is suggesting that anti-vaxxers should be rounded up and put in camps?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 07:45:53 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 07:14:31 AM
Even if that were so, how can one force people to be healthy against their will, except by reverting to totalitarian measures? The Romanian Constitution states clearly that health is a right. Now it has suddenly turned into an obligation --- without anyone having elected anybody to amend the said Constitution.

Are you really not at all concerned about fracturing society along vaccination lines and creating a whole class of untermenschen, ie the unvaccinated, who are blamed for all the evils befelling on the vaccinated and who should be excluded as far as possible from the society? Does it really not at all frighten you the thought that this situation could be the basis for policy-making in years to come? I sincerely doubt it, or at least I want to sincerely doubt it.

I am not opposed to mask use and to some common-sense restrictions --- but I am firmly opposed to turning vaccination and restrictions into principles on which society should be ordered until there will be not one single Covid-19 case recorded anymore, ie until Kingdom Come.

The Danish government loosened restrictions too quickly, it now seems, due to an eagerness to return to the completely normal as soon as possible, and an unrealistic scenario of vaccines completely and quickly erradicating the virus. Likewise, they are now saying, that restrictions are likely to be more locally than nationally implemented, at least within the foreseeable future. Vaccines help massively in reducing the severeness of cases, and their number. Future treatment options are likely to improve the situation further.

As for obligatory vaccines, my impression is it can't lawfully be made mandatory here in DK. They're suggesting however that employers should have the right to demand it. It's absurd that you can work with people in the health- or elderly sector without being vaccinated, and with only irregular testing, putting other people's health at risk, for example (and people close to you can't even know your status). I know of such cases resulting in severe problems, say in hospitals or retirement homes. So in some sectors, it seems reasonable to me. But as regards a general mandatory vaccine, I'm against it, or it would require a drastic worsening of the situation, that is not very likely. The Austrian initiative is not the way to go now, at least in DK, but the hoping for a good, voluntarily improved development, with the help of some restrictions, and better treatments. If necessary, by employing massive ressources on it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 08:03:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 07:45:53 AM
The Danish government loosened restrictions too quickly, it now seems, due to an eagerness to return to the completely normal as soon as possible, and an unrealistic scenario of vaccines completely and quickly erradicating the virus. Likewise, they are now saying, that restrictions are likely to be more locally than nationally implemented, at least within the foreseeable future. Vaccines help massively in reducing the severeness of cases, and their number. Future treatment options are likely to improve the situation further.


Why isn't Denmark following the UK's example?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 08:05:38 AM
Russia's record virus death toll persists — 9:38 a.m.

Associated Press

Russia's record high coronavirus death toll persisted for a second straight day on Saturday, as the number of new infections declined.

The state coronavirus task force reported 1,254 COVID-19 deaths, matching Friday's tally.

The task force also reported 37,120 new confirmed cases. The daily new infections in recent weeks appear to have a downward trend but still remain higher than during previous surges of the virus.

The latest surge in infections and deaths comes amid low vaccination rates and lax public attitudes toward taking precautions. About 40% of Russia's nearly 146 million people have been fully vaccinated, even though the country approved a domestically developed COVID-19 vaccine months before most of the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 08:07:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 08:03:27 AM
Why isn't Denmark following the UK's example?

Oh, the UK... that bright shining beacon of light in this dark world?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 08:09:28 AM
When can the COVID-19 masks finally come off? — 11:58 p.m.

New York Times

Amid the turmoil of the past two years — a period that included a deadly pandemic, mass layoffs, an ugly presidential election and an attack on the U.S. Capitol — some of the fiercest political debates in America have been waged over a nearly weightless piece of fabric: the face mask.

U.S. officials were slow to embrace face masks as a strategy for slowing the spread of the coronavirus. When they finally did, masks became a potent symbol of the pandemic — a common-sense public health measure turned political flashpoint and a visible reminder that life was anything but normal.

Now, with the summer's delta surge in the rearview mirror and the vaccination of school-age children underway, many Americans are wondering when the masks might finally come off.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 08:55:38 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 07:41:05 AM
[I am responding to Florestan as well.]

It is evident that there can be legitimate reasons not be vaccinated.

Would you include among "legitimate reasons not be vaccinated" if I say "Based on (1) publicly available scientific information and using (2) whatever scientific skills I may have acquired as a M. Sc. in Mechanical Engineering and (3) logic and common-sense, and considering that I have officially recovered from Covid-19 and I refer you to point (1) in this respect  --- I have legitimate reasons not to be vaccinated"?

QuoteHence, not everybody that doesn't want to be vaccinated is an "anti-vaxxer". 

Thank you.

QuoteIn most cases this relates to a severely compromised immune system and/or a very frail physical condition. The best protection for this group of people is that everbody else is vaccinated.

Given that according to both official CDC  statements and published scientific data, vaccinated people can get infected and spread the disease, the above conclusion is not warranted in any way.

Quoteextremely rare that a (any) vaccination affects a pregnancy.

Once again, according to official Pfizer and Moderna documents:

There is limited experience with use of Comirnaty / Spikevax in pregnant women.

Then on what basis do you claim that it's extremely rare that a (any) vaccination affects a pregnancy? The best you can safely say is that based on limited experience it's extremely rare that a (any) vaccination affects a pregnancy. Which begs the question: what "limited experience" means scientifically, and what is the scientifically established threshold  over which you can safely claim that it's extremely rare that a (any) vaccination affects a pregnancy?

Furthermore, the selfsame official pfizer and Moderna documents state

Administration of Comirnaty in pregnancy should only be
considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus

[/i][/b]

Which begs not one but two questions: (1) who is entitled, and on what basis, to decide that the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus? and (2) if the mother still decides that she doesn't want to get the vaccine no matter what, is it ethical, moral or legal to coerce her into getting the vaccine?

QuoteThe advice to pregnant women is therefore to get vaccinated.

I'm sorry, but anyone who adviced them to get vaccinated without any prior assessment of whether the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus would act contrary to the official Pfizer and Moderna gudelines quoted above.

QuoteSofar no cases of vaccine related complications (specific to pregnancy) are known. There are no certainties, but the risk assessment seems pretty straight forward to me.

I quote what I hear daily on Romanian TV channels: "You are not a physician, therefore you are not qualified to make statements regarding vaccines".

QuoteWho is suggesting that anti-vaxxers should be rounded up and put in camps?  ::)

For the time being, nobody. Yet the very fact that unvaccinated people are denied certain basic freedoms and rights is reason enough for great concern --- at least for those people who still have living memories of how undesirable people were treated, and I hope you will not deny that today governments across Europe make clear by word and deed that unvaccinated are undesirable people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 09:05:05 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 08:07:11 AM
Oh, the UK... that bright shining beacon of light in this dark world?  ::)

Why are you so angry about UK and lose no opportunity to paint them in black, I wonder?  ???

Look, I've been living and studying in The Netherlands for more than one year and I could make a very long list of grievances against Dutch mentality and society. Suffice it to say that only at the point of a gun could I be forced to live in The Netherlands for the remaining of my life.  ;D

Seriously now, my point is that each country and nation have their own customs and ways --- and this is exacttly what makes the world an exciting, interesting and worth living in place. The very moment any and all man and woman on Earth would start thinking, feeling and behaving exactly the same the world would turn into a nightmarish Hell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 09:05:20 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 08:07:11 AM


Oh, the UK... that bright shining beacon of light in this dark world?  ::)

One critical success factor is how quickly we can get people to take their third dose. But most analyses I've read say that we're doing fine till the new year at least.  The new year will herald the start of a flu epidemic probably, so no-one can say.

The real interesting thing socially is how we can be all set for 50K+ covid deaths a year and hardly anyone's batting an eyelid. But then it's less than the number of smoking deaths.

My real point was that the vaccination rates in Holland and Denmark and indeed Austria are not dissimilar from the UK's -- so the British way may prove to be the best way for you guys too.  After all -- what's the alternative?!  I wouldn't want to gloat but I don't believe you've found a better alternative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 09:09:38 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 20, 2021, 07:37:17 AM
It would be interesting to know more about  where there is such a pattern, and to what extent, and where not.

Agreed.

Romania is a blatant instance in this respect.

Are there any others?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 09:13:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 20, 2021, 08:05:38 AM
Russia's record virus death toll persists — 9:38 a.m.

Associated Press

Russia's record high coronavirus death toll persisted for a second straight day on Saturday, as the number of new infections declined.

The state coronavirus task force reported 1,254 COVID-19 deaths, matching Friday's tally.

The task force also reported 37,120 new confirmed cases. The daily new infections in recent weeks appear to have a downward trend but still remain higher than during previous surges of the virus.

The latest surge in infections and deaths comes amid low vaccination rates and lax public attitudes toward taking precautions. About 40% of Russia's nearly 146 million people have been fully vaccinated, even though the country approved a domestically developed COVID-19 vaccine months before most of the world.

The other day Romanian TV channels reported that unvaccinated Russians may soon be unable to buy vodka.

I wonder if this is true. And if this is true, I wonder how such a ruling could be enforced.

I am reminded of somebody's dictum (I can't remember whose otomh but I strongly feel it was a Russian writer) that in a totalitarian regime corruption is the only guarantee of personal freedom left to people.  ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 20, 2021, 09:14:16 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 15, 2021, 09:10:17 AM
Got boosted this morning.

[Update] I'm scheduled for Monday at the County site. Despite being only 64, I phoned the County last Thursday and asked if I could get the booster. They said "yes" because of my job (contact with public).
Too lazy to go on Friday (it's an hour drive), so went for the next available date. I trust the County facility much more than the local pharmacy (CVS) chain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 09:30:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 09:05:05 AM
Why are you so angry about UK and lose no opportunity to paint them in black, I wonder?  ???

Well, the UK has fallen of its historical pedestal in a most deplorable way. And please don't get me started on the rot of democratic values and standards of civic society that is occurring in some Eastern European countries. But that is geopolitics to be discussed on another occasion.

Back to the topic at hand and UK. The idea that the UK had handled and is handling this pandemic in an exemplary way,  is absolutely ludicrous. And that has nothing to do with national customs or ways.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 09:35:48 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 09:30:05 AM
Well, the UK has fallen of its historical pedestal in a most deplorable way. And please don't get me started on the rot of democratic values and standards of civic society that is occurring in some Eastern European countries. But that is geopolitics to be discussed on another occasion.

Back to the topic at hand and UK. The idea that the UK had handled and is handling this pandemic in an exemplary way,  is absolutely ludicrous. And that has nothing to do with national customs or ways.

We did three things which were exemplary and which were very important

1. Reduce the gap between the first two doses
2. Vaccinate quickly, efficiently and in a very structured way.
3. Develop an open relationship between policy makers and the public, so trust was not eroded.

Whether our approach to shifting to endemic stage is the best role model for other states to follow depends on whether there is a better model. I am suggesting that there may not be, at least for states with a large base of vaccinated people (like Holland) and a well functioning public health service.

To be honest, my biggest worry about the British way is not to do with covid deaths at all, it is to do with the long tail of non covid illnesses for the National Health System has been delaying treating. That's potentially a big sting in the tail.

But even so, I would say that it's far from obvious that there's a better strategy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 20, 2021, 09:40:35 AM
Across Europe, protests swell against pandemic restrictions (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-protests-restrictions-rotterdam/2021/11/20/298d8f7c-4a14-11ec-beca-3cc7103bd814_story.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 09:51:28 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 09:30:05 AM
Well, the UK has fallen of its historical pedastal in a most deplorable way.

This might be true for those who placed the UK on a historical pedestal. I am not one of them.

Quotedon't get me started on the rot of democratic values and standards of civic society that is occurring in some Eastern European countries.

See? That's one big problem for us rotten Eastern Europeans: the arrogant, holier-than-thou, we-know-better-than-you attitude of people who think they are the be-all-and-end-all of democracy and civic society just because they happened to be rescued and shielded from totalitarianism by the USA.

By all means, go on patronizing and lecturing us and force-feeding on us your values and standards --- but then please stop wondering why is it that an increasing number of people who eagerly and sincerely wanted to join the EU (yours truly is one such) are now hugely disappointed and, given the opportunity, would vote for exit. What we wanted and expected is not at all what we got --- in some cases it was the very opposite, honestly.

QuoteBut that is geopolitics to be discussed on another occasion.

Agreed.

Quotethe idea that the UK had handled and is handling this pandemic in an exemplary way,  is absolutely ludicrous.

I never claimed that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 10:13:48 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 09:35:48 AM
We did two things which were exemplary and which were very important

1. Reduce the gap between the first two doses
2. Vaccinate quickly, efficiently and in a very structured way.

Whether our approach to shifting to endemic stage is the best role model for other states to follow depends on whether there is a better model. I am suggesting that there may not be, at least for states with a large base of vaccinated people (like Holland) and a well functioning public health service.

To be honest, my biggest worry about the British way is not to do with covid deaths at all, it is to do with the long tail of non covid illnesses for the National Health System has been delaying treating. That's potentially a big sting in the tail.

But even so, I would say that it's far from obvious that there's a better strategy.

Let's not forget that at the beginning of this crisis the laissez faire policy of the British ("let the virus run its course"), which was purposely chosen, made the situation in the UK actually the worst in Europe.

The early availability of the AstraZeneca vaccine was not a the result of amazing policy decisions, but was purely accidental. Only history will tell us whether this was because the British lawyers were smarther than those of the EU, or that Johnson pulled some strings with his "chums". I suspect the latter. The UK got subsequently lucky in already having the NHS, compliments to Labour govts and a good reminder for Tories that want to tear it apart or sell it off, to conduct an efficient vaccination program.

Because the situation in the UK was so desperate and vaccinations were running smoothly, it decided to shorten the time gap between the shots. Another lucky gamble that payed off...

During all that time the UK did not compare well to many countries  in terms of infections or hospitalisations. Eventually it lost its head start in vaccinations. To top it all off: AZ does not appear to be the best vaccine. It wasn't as effective to begin with and effectiveness goes down quicker than with other vaccines. The UK population needs a booster more urgently.

But I'm sure in retrospect this all seems utterly brilliant...  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 10:25:06 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 10:13:48 AM
Let's not forget that at the beginning of this crisis the laissez faire policy of the British ("let the virus run its course"), which was purposely chosen, made the situation in the UK actually the worst in Europe.

The early availability of the AstraZeneca vaccine was not a the result of amazing policy decisions, but was purely accidental. Only history will tell us whether this was because the British lawyers were smarther than those of the EU, or that Johnson pulled some strings with his "chums". I suspect the latter. The UK got subsequently lucky in already having the NHS, compliments to Labour govts and a good reminder for Tories that want to tear it apart or sell it off, to conduct an efficient vaccination program.

Because the situation in the UK was so desperate and vaccinations were running smoothly, it decided to shorten the time gap between the shots. Another lucky gamble that payed off...

During all that time the UK did not compare well to many countries  in terms of infections or hospitalisations. Eventually it lost its head start in vaccinations. To top it all off: AZ does not appear to be the best vaccine. It wasn't as effective to begin with and effectiveness goes down quicker than with other vaccines. The UK population needs a booster more urgently.

But I'm sure in retrospect this all seems utterly brilliant...  ::)

I think you're avoiding addressing the question at hand, which is: is the British way now the best way for countries with a suitable level of vaccination and a suitably large public health service (like Holland maybe)? And if not, what is the better way?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 11:14:15 AM
Quote from: T. D. on November 20, 2021, 09:14:16 AM
[Update] I'm scheduled for Monday at the County site. Despite being only 64, I phoned the County last Thursday and asked if I could get the booster. They said "yes" because of my job (contact with public).
Too lazy to go on Friday (it's an hour drive), so went for the next available date. I trust the County facility much more than the local pharmacy (CVS) chain.

Very good. As with my first two shots, My system took the booster in stride.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 11:24:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 20, 2021, 11:14:15 AM
Very good. As with my first two shots, My system took the booster in stride.

Good job!  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on November 20, 2021, 11:43:35 AM
Quote from: The new erato on November 19, 2021, 04:58:14 AM
In the long term you and we all will die. And somebody will surely blame it in long term effects of the vaccine, even after 20 years.
I'm only going to be 53 in 20 years. I'm planning on living as long as possible, retiring by 50 and enjoying my life of health and wealth. So avoiding everything as long as possible (people, new vaccines) would have been the best option. Maybe not everyone is okay with that strategy, but I am. But I don't get that option.


Quote from: BasilValentine on November 19, 2021, 05:08:04 AM
You mean the hive mind that eliminated small pox from the planet? That cornered polio into a last stand in Pakistan? The one where everyone in their right mind has their children vaccinated against multiple diseases so they can go to school? The hive that listens to disinterested scientists offering objective evidence about a health crisis?
I understand the reasons and results for mandating vaccines. But what I have a problem with are the people who flat out don't understand the pushback, the opposite side. It's like they don't even value their own choices for what they want for their own body, or understand the concerns of what type of precedent this could set. People being passive and complying isn't going to stop a government that's hellbent on micromanaging its citizens lives.

You could say that you believe it's just a temporary thing, and that the government isn't trying to become more authoritarian, in which case I'd say it's unlikely, but at least I'd respect that different opinion. What I can't respect is the opinion that we shouldn't care if we are sliding into authoritarianism.



Quote from: BasilValentine on November 19, 2021, 05:08:04 AM
I think you should be glad you've taken a reasonable step to protect your coworkers and others, even if you felt forced into it.
I've protected no one but myself (hopefully), and that isn't guaranteed, either. Also, I work from home, so I don't get anywhere close to anyone for 5 days a week. The other two, I keep distance and wear a mask.
This argument doesn't work any more now that we know vaccinated people can spread it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 12:20:28 PM
Quote from: Todd on November 20, 2021, 09:40:35 AM
Across Europe, protests swell against pandemic restrictions (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-protests-restrictions-rotterdam/2021/11/20/298d8f7c-4a14-11ec-beca-3cc7103bd814_story.html)

Hooligans!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:01:23 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 20, 2021, 09:14:16 AM
[Update] I'm scheduled for Monday at the County site. Despite being only 64, I phoned the County last Thursday and asked if I could get the booster. They said "yes" because of my job (contact with public).
Too lazy to go on Friday (it's an hour drive), so went for the next available date. I trust the County facility much more than the local pharmacy (CVS) chain.

And as of yesterday (I think), all adults in the US are eligible for a booster regardless of age, as long as one is 6 months out from the 2nd dose of an mRNA vaccine, or 2 months out from the J&J.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 20, 2021, 01:13:11 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:01:23 PM
And as of yesterday (I think), all adults in the US are eligible for a booster regardless of age, as long as one is 6 months out from the 2nd dose of an mRNA vaccine, or 2 months out from the J&J.

I am not sure of that.
When I signed up yesterday afternoon, the County (in NY State) site still stated that mRNA vaccine recipients under the age of 65 had additional medical / occupational requirements.
That point has confused me for a while. I've seen a number of headline "all adults" statements, but the concrete appointment-making sites have not been reflecting them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:26:44 PM
Quote from: greg on November 20, 2021, 11:43:35 AM
You could say that you believe it's just a temporary thing, and that the government isn't trying to become more authoritarian, in which case I'd say it's unlikely, but at least I'd respect that different opinion. What I can't respect is the opinion that we shouldn't care if we are sliding into authoritarianism.

IMO requiring vaccination as a condition for entering certain public spaces is a reasonable measure during a public health emergency such as we are in today. It is not so much that it is temporary as that it is a one-off, and very exceptional situation. The world has not seen a pandemic such as this in slightly over a century. I would very much care if I felt we were sliding into authoritarianism (and DID care about precisely that during the years 2017 - 2020, and into January 2021). I am very much concerned about the loss of civil liberties such as those enshrined by the 2nd Amendment, both because the infringement of those rights can be the first step on a slippery slope to depriving the people of other, also Constitutionally guaranteed rights; and because the pushback from such infringements can lead to the people electing populist and egocentric leaders who will truly complete the slide into authoritarianism. I do not feel that depriving citizens whose decisions contribute to endangering others of the freedom to enter certain public spaces under these exceptional circumstances is comparable to the pogroms of the last century that created a class of "untermenschen", as someone implied. I do not feel that this constitutes a slide into authoritarianism. I'll feel differently if the restrictions are maintained for longer than, or are imposed when they are no longer supportable by the facts and the science. We're nowhere near that point now.

Quote
This argument doesn't work any more now that we know vaccinated people can spread it.

Yes, vaccinated people can spread it, but that doesn't invalidate the argument. It is not a black and white question, can or cannot. Unvaccinated people are far likelier to spread the virus. Vaccinated people are much less likely to become infected in the first place, and if they do contract the virus, they harbour infectious quantities for a significantly shorter time than the unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:30:47 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 20, 2021, 01:13:11 PM
I am not sure of that.
When I signed up yesterday afternoon, the County (in NY State) site still stated that mRNA vaccine recipients under the age of 65 had additional medical / occupational requirements.
That point has confused me for a while. I've seen a number of headline "all adults" statements, but the concrete appointment-making sites have not been reflecting them.

I have only seen/heard the same headlines as you, but they were quite explicit: both the CDC and the FDA have signed off on this. It is likely that the appointment-making sites just haven't been updated, or hadn't been as of yesterday. The decision JUST came down yesterday or the day before. When adults over 65 became eligible, Walgreens' appointment system was still refusing to schedule anyone who wasn't vulnerable for medical reasons for at least a couple of days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 01:32:22 PM
greg, I sincerely doubt that you know what arguments work and what arguments don't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 20, 2021, 01:33:15 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:30:47 PM
I have only seen/heard the same headlines as you, but they were quite explicit: both the CDC and the FDA have signed off on this. It is likely that the appointment-making sites just haven't been updated, or hadn't been as of yesterday. The decision JUST came down yesterday or the day before. When adults over 65 became eligible, Walgreens' appointment system was still refusing to schedule anyone who wasn't vulnerable for medical reasons for at least a couple of days.

A lag in catching up is only to be expected, I suppose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 20, 2021, 03:13:11 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 20, 2021, 08:55:38 AM
Given that according to both official CDC  statements and published scientific data, vaccinated people can get infected and spread the disease, the above conclusion is not warranted in any way.

Oh, yes it is. This is a very common and quite persistent misunderstanding. The fact that (some) vaccinated could still catch and pass on the virus, doesn't mean that vaccination couldn't make the crucial difference. The level of infectiousness is so much lower that the virus would still die out amongst a mainly vaccinated population. It is the large reservoir of unvaccinated that keeps the virus going!

BTW Another interesting fact: if you have recovered from Covid, you can get it again. Especially if it is another strain.
Just saying...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 11:55:23 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 20, 2021, 01:26:44 PM
IMO requiring vaccination as a condition for entering certain public spaces is a reasonable measure during a public health emergency such as we are in today. It is not so much that it is temporary as that it is a one-off, and very exceptional situation. The world has not seen a pandemic such as this in slightly over a century. I would very much care if I felt we were sliding into authoritarianism (and DID care about precisely that during the years 2017 - 2020, and into January 2021). I am very much concerned about the loss of civil liberties such as those enshrined by the 2nd Amendment, both because the infringement of those rights can be the first step on a slippery slope to depriving the people of other, also Constitutionally guaranteed rights; and because the pushback from such infringements can lead to the people electing populist and egocentric leaders who will truly complete the slide into authoritarianism. I do not feel that depriving citizens whose decisions contribute to endangering others of the freedom to enter certain public spaces under these exceptional circumstances is comparable to the pogroms of the last century that created a class of "untermenschen", as someone implied. I do not feel that this constitutes a slide into authoritarianism. I'll feel differently if the restrictions are maintained for longer than, or are imposed when they are no longer supportable by the facts and the science. We're nowhere near that point now.


The situation is not as drastic as you paint in Holland or Austria or Denmark or France or . . . , at least prima facie. There the decision to constrain the people is a choice, not something which is imposed by morality and the pandemic.


There is a high rate of vaccination protecting the population, and booster doses are available. The public health services are well developed.

The state has an alternative strategy: to let prevalence grow and provide care to those who fall ill, many of whom will not be fully vaccinated. They have made their own beds knowingly and freely, and so they must lie on them.

This is the UK way, which I am suggesting is the best way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 11:57:50 PM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 03:13:11 PM
Oh, yes it is. This is a very common and quite persistent misunderstanding. The fact that (some) vaccinated could still catch and pass on the virus, doesn't mean that vaccination couldn't make the crucial difference. The level of infectiousness is so much lower that the virus would still die out amongst a mainly vaccinated population. It is the large reservoir of unvaccinated that keeps the virus going!

BTW Another interesting fact: if you have recovered from Covid, you can get it again. Especially if it is another strain.
Just saying...

Did you see the riots in The Hague yesterday? Were you there?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 21, 2021, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 11:57:50 PM
Did you see the riots in The Hague yesterday? Were you there?

I live in the Hague, but I was not at the riots.  ;)

There were calls on social media to cause riots and subsequently a lot of bored and dissatisfied youngsters took to the streets.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 21, 2021, 06:53:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 20, 2021, 11:55:23 PM
The situation is not as drastic as you paint in Holland or Austria or Denmark or France or . . . , at least prima facie. There the decision to constrain the people is a choice, not something which is imposed by morality and the pandemic.

A couple points:

1. I was speaking generally, not addressing the specific situation in any European country (and since I live in the States and all I know of the situation in Austria etc. is what I read/hear on the news, I don't really know enough about it to comment).

2. I would say that the decision to constrain is always a choice, even when it is the obvious and moral thing to do. We always have a choice to behave morally or not, and likewise, governments can choose to act in accordance with common morality, or not.

Quote
The state has an alternative strategy: to let prevalence grow and provide care to those who fall ill, many of whom will not be fully vaccinated. They have made their own beds knowingly and freely, and so they must lie on them.

This is the UK way, which I am suggesting is the best way.

Whether that is the best way or not, depends on how much death and long term illness one is willing to accept as a consequence. It is not clear that endemicity is going to be achieved either easily or without great suffering. And I always go back to the fact that requiring people to get vaccinated is not so much a matter of forcing them to act in the interests of their own health, but of that of others who may be vulnerable even though they are vaccinated. And many people who refuse to get vaccinated do so because they have been misled by shady practitioners into thinking the vaccine is riskier for them than it really is (I have a friend in that situation).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 21, 2021, 07:19:05 AM
WHO CEO for Europe, Hans Kluge, not excluding mandatory vaccines later this year, since it might save up to half a million lives, that would otherwise be lost, he says.

Here in DK, the atmosphere so far is generally against vaccines being mandatory, warnings are that it might also result in polarization and unrest on a much bigger scale than hitherto. A poll says that 41% of Danes are OK with mandatory vaccines.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 21, 2021, 08:09:21 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 21, 2021, 06:53:19 AM
A couple points:

1. I was speaking generally, not addressing the specific situation in any European country (and since I live in the States and all I know of the situation in Austria etc. is what I read/hear on the news, I don't really know enough about it to comment).

2. I would say that the decision to constrain is always a choice, even when it is the obvious and moral thing to do. We always have a choice to behave morally or not, and likewise, governments can choose to act in accordance with common morality, or not.

Whether that is the best way or not, depends on how much death and long term illness one is willing to accept as a consequence. It is not clear that endemicity is going to be achieved either easily or without great suffering. And I always go back to the fact that requiring people to get vaccinated is not so much a matter of forcing them to act in the interests of their own health, but of that of others who may be vulnerable even though they are vaccinated. And many people who refuse to get vaccinated do so because they have been misled by shady practitioners into thinking the vaccine is riskier for them than it really is (I have a friend in that situation).

There is another thing I want to mention parenthetically. The feasibility of the British way in part depends on the level of population immunity obviously. In the UK we have built that up over Summer and early autumn - prevalence has been very high here. That was a deliberately strategy - the aim being to avoid a winter peak, when flu and other winter illnesses have an impact on hospital capacity.

So the British way may not in fact be an option in countries which imposed NPIs in summer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 21, 2021, 08:12:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 21, 2021, 07:19:05 AM
WHO CEO for Europe, Hans Kluge, not excluding mandatory vaccines later this year, since it might save up to half a million lives, that would otherwise be lost, he says.

Here in DK, the atmosphere so far is generally against vaccines being mandatory, warnings are that it might also result in polarization and unrest on a much bigger scale than hitherto. A poll says that 41% of Danes are OK with mandatory vaccines.

Some countries - maybe Denmark, I don't know -  are caught between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand lockdowns are going to make the vaccinated resent the unvaccinated. On the other hand vaccine mandates are going to make the unvaccinated resent the government.

Sometimes - given my thought that lockdown is a choice, not something forced on states, and my general political disillusionment and cynicism  - sometimes I wonder whether the political classes are deliberately using the crisis to create social divisions - any excuse to increase authoritarian measures!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 21, 2021, 08:23:38 AM
Press here is increasingly bringing interviews with non-vaccinated, hearing their side. Obviously, reasons vary, and some are relatively well-articulated as well. It might calm down tempers a bit, that their voice is heard. Or it might give them a stronger voice, but I don't think so. Yet, who knows.

The actions here were a normalization that went too fast afterwards, contrary to many countries. That's not a very authoritarian behaviour.

I think it's fair to say that class separations are traditionally more outspoken in the UK.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 21, 2021, 08:51:16 AM
This may be interesting if you can get it -- an interview with  Andrew Pollard who's an Oxford epidemiologist. I think it shows a certain smugness about the British approach -- but the general feeling promulgated by media pundits here is that we seem to have done the right thing and that Johnny Foreigner has messed up. Starts at 27.13

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0011vn3/the-andrew-marr-show-21112021?page=1

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 21, 2021, 09:05:25 AM
Opinion: Florida's Republican lawmakers deliver another blow for DeSantis against the common good


By Lizette Alvarez, Contributing columnist
Yesterday at 12:56 p.m. EST

Florida's Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, doesn't often ask for help. He is a go-it-alone kind of guy who has largely chosen to tackle the coronavirus pandemic solo, making a calculated political wager on Darwinian logic, balmy weather and the hobbled common sense of many Floridians.

The results earned Florida top 10 status in per capita U.S. covid deaths — nearly 61,000 as of Friday. But, hey, at least the state's economy is rolling!

Recently, though, DeSantis changed his tune out of necessity. He needed the power of the Republican-packed Florida legislature to help him officially free us Floridians from the tyranny of President Biden's vaccine mandates.

On Wednesday night, during a legislative special session, lawmakers passed a package of bills making it harder for businesses to make sure their Florida employees are vaccinated, and impossible for local governments and schools to require masks or vaccines.

The legislature handed DeSantis a political gift. He can now proclaim to his Republican base that he is America's freedom-iest leader. Then, in a stroke of political theater on Thursday, DeSantis signed the bills into law in Brandon, Fla., amid a predictable fanboy chorus of "Let's go Brandon," a cryptic insult aimed at Biden.

The victory was the governor's latest assault on the noble notion of collective good — a term now seemingly viewed by his supporters as communism writ large.

"I'm a farmer. I look at things in simple terms," said state Sen. Ben Albritton (R) on the Senate floor on Wednesday. "What I believe that we are doing here today is we are choosing to support, protect and defend individual rights."

Democrats tried to counter with logic and verifiable facts, a daring tactic in the Sunshine State: More than 195 million Americans have been vaccinated and, with extremely rare exceptions, they are fine. Most of those in intensive care units are unvaccinated. Children have long been required to get vaccines to go to school. George Washington forced his soldiers to get smallpox vaccines to help win the Revolutionary War.

Then, Democrats evoked the days, not so long ago, when people were hoarding toilet paper and feared that touching a box of cereal at the supermarket might be deadly. Remember how badly we wanted a vaccine? The Democrats even threw the Republicans a bone, pointing out that the vaccine success story was President Donald Trump's doing.

"What has happened to us as a country?" state Sen. Gary Farmer (D) asked on the Senate floor. "Sacrifices are made for the greater good. Not for the squeaky, loud wheel over here who puts rationality and science aside because they want to make a statement."

Children, and teachers, also fell outside the reach of the greater good. The new law codifies that parents, not public schools, decide whether children should wear masks or get vaccinated. Parents who sue defiant schools that ignore the law can recoup their attorneys' fees if they succeed.

Luckily, DeSantis did not get everything he wanted. He pushed for an outright ban on vaccine mandates for private-sector employees and threatened to strip offending companies of their covid-19 liability protection, a rare anti-business gambit by the governor. But lawmakers, apparently haunted by visions of diminished campaign coffers, recoiled. It would have meant aggravating Disney, for example, which mandates vaccinations and masks for most employees at its sites.

Instead, Florida companies can require vaccinations as long as they offer five opt-outs: medical or religious exemptions, evidence of natural immunity from covid based on a medical test, or the willingness of the employee to be tested periodically or wear a mask. Exemptions under the new law also include pregnancy or "anticipating pregnancy," a vague term that presumably gives cover to practically all women in the workforce. If these alternatives are not offered, businesses risk fines of at least $10,000 per violation.

The Biden administration also offers exemptions, only they are narrower. Health-care and nursing-home workers can apply for religious or medical carve-outs. And other private-sector employees of large companies can opt out by getting tested every week.

The new Florida law also forces some businesses into a tug of war between the state and federal government. Hospitals, nursing homes and other care facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid stand to lose crucial funds if they don't adhere to Biden's vaccine mandate.

DeSantis and Republican legislators have abandoned any pretense of conservative opposition to big government, wresting control from schools, local governments and private companies — the entities that would know what's best for their own communities, employees and bottom lines. They are even planning a new agency, a state version of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, to skirt Biden's rules.

There is, however, a sliver of good news to come out of this not-so-special session: The legislation expires in June 2023. Let's hope by then it will have become irrelevant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 21, 2021, 09:11:41 AM
GOP embraces natural immunity as substitute for vaccines — 11:24 a.m.
Associated Press

Republicans fighting President Joe Biden's coronavirus vaccine mandates are wielding a new weapon against the White House rules: natural immunity.

They contend that people who have recovered from the virus have enough immunity and antibodies to not need COVID-19 vaccines, and the concept has been invoked by Republicans as a sort of stand-in for vaccines.

Florida wrote natural immunity into state law this week as GOP lawmakers elsewhere are pushing similar measures to sidestep vaccine mandates. Lawsuits over the mandates have also begun leaning on the idea. Conservative federal lawmakers have implored regulators to consider it when formulating mandates.

Scientists acknowledge that people previously infected with COVID-19 have some level of immunity but that vaccines offer a more consistent level of protection. Natural immunity is also far from a one-size-fits-all scenario, making it complicated to enact sweeping exemptions to vaccines.

That's because how much immunity COVID-19 survivors have depends on how long ago they were infected, how sick they were, and if the virus variant they had is different from mutants circulating now. For example, a person who had a minor case one year ago is much different than a person who had a severe case over the summer when the delta variant was raging through the country. It's also difficult to reliably test whether someone is protected from future infections.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in August that COVID-19 survivors who ignored advice to get vaccinated were more than twice as likely to get infected again. [emphasis mine — kh] A more recent study from the CDC, looking at data from nearly 190 hospitals in nine states, determined that unvaccinated people who had been infected months earlier were five times more likely to get COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people who didn't have a prior infection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 21, 2021, 09:55:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 21, 2021, 09:11:41 AM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in August that COVID-19 survivors who ignored advice to get vaccinated were more than twice as likely to get infected again. [emphasis mine — kh] A more recent study from the CDC, looking at data from nearly 190 hospitals in nine states, determined that unvaccinated people who had been infected months earlier were five times more likely to get COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people who didn't have a prior infection.

In response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention ("CDC") admitted it does not have any documented cases of unvaccinated people being re-infected or transmitting Covid to another person after acquiring natural immunity.

In September a New York attorney, Elizabeth Brehm, had requested "documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected."

The CDC responded in a letter dated 5 November.  "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request," a spokesperson for the CDC replied. "The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected."


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FD8-lm9VQAIoy1F?format=jpg&name=900x900)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on November 22, 2021, 12:27:56 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 21, 2021, 09:55:57 AM
In response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention ("CDC") admitted it does not have any documented cases of unvaccinated people being re-infected or transmitting Covid to another person after acquiring natural immunity.

In September a New York attorney, Elizabeth Brehm, had requested "documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected."

The CDC responded in a letter dated 5 November.  "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request," a spokesperson for the CDC replied. "The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected."


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FD8-lm9VQAIoy1F?format=jpg&name=900x900)

That FOIA letter doesn't mean anything.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 12:37:11 AM
An official survey here in DK from March 2021 found that you are 80% protected, if you've had the disease, 50% if you are above 65 years. Meaning that if you had tested positive, the likelihood of testing positive again would be 1/5 or 1/2, compared to not having had the disease. It was based on 4 mio PCR tests from people who had several tests, and the positive tests had to be at least 3 months apart. Due to the low, registered infection rates in DK generally, for 80% protection, it meant that in reality, 6.5 out of 1000 positives were tested positive twice.

Now there may be some other factors at play also for these statistics, for example some people being in an environment with a bigger risk of infection, some virus types being more infectuous etc., but probably not influencing the bigger picture that much anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 22, 2021, 01:09:40 AM
Quote from: Daverz on November 22, 2021, 12:27:56 AM
That FOIA letter doesn't mean anything.

It means exactly what it says, namely that (1) the CDC does not have any documented cases of unvaccinated people being re-infected or transmitting Covid to another person after acquiring natural immunity and (2) they don't have them because they don't collect such information.

This of course doesn't mean such documented cases don't exist, but begs the question why the CDC, which is supposed to be so greatly knowledgeable exactly about that issue as to make at least two authoritative pronouncements about it (see Karl's quote above), does not collect, and keep records of, such essential information.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 22, 2021, 05:04:26 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 21, 2021, 09:05:25 AM
Opinion: Florida's Republican lawmakers deliver another blow for DeSantis against the common good


By Lizette Alvarez, Contributing columnist
Yesterday at 12:56 p.m. EST

Florida's Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, doesn't often ask for help. He is a go-it-alone kind of guy who has largely chosen to tackle the coronavirus pandemic solo, making a calculated political wager on Darwinian logic, balmy weather and the hobbled common sense of many Floridians.

The results earned Florida top 10 status in per capita U.S. covid deaths — nearly 61,000 as of Friday. But, hey, at least the state's economy is rolling!

Recently, though, DeSantis changed his tune out of necessity. He needed the power of the Republican-packed Florida legislature to help him officially free us Floridians from the tyranny of President Biden's vaccine mandates.

On Wednesday night, during a legislative special session, lawmakers passed a package of bills making it harder for businesses to make sure their Florida employees are vaccinated, and impossible for local governments and schools to require masks or vaccines.

The legislature handed DeSantis a political gift. He can now proclaim to his Republican base that he is America's freedom-iest leader. Then, in a stroke of political theater on Thursday, DeSantis signed the bills into law in Brandon, Fla., amid a predictable fanboy chorus of "Let's go Brandon," a cryptic insult aimed at Biden.

The victory was the governor's latest assault on the noble notion of collective good — a term now seemingly viewed by his supporters as communism writ large.

"I'm a farmer. I look at things in simple terms," said state Sen. Ben Albritton (R) on the Senate floor on Wednesday. "What I believe that we are doing here today is we are choosing to support, protect and defend individual rights."

Democrats tried to counter with logic and verifiable facts, a daring tactic in the Sunshine State: More than 195 million Americans have been vaccinated and, with extremely rare exceptions, they are fine. Most of those in intensive care units are unvaccinated. Children have long been required to get vaccines to go to school. George Washington forced his soldiers to get smallpox vaccines to help win the Revolutionary War.

Then, Democrats evoked the days, not so long ago, when people were hoarding toilet paper and feared that touching a box of cereal at the supermarket might be deadly. Remember how badly we wanted a vaccine? The Democrats even threw the Republicans a bone, pointing out that the vaccine success story was President Donald Trump's doing.

"What has happened to us as a country?" state Sen. Gary Farmer (D) asked on the Senate floor. "Sacrifices are made for the greater good. Not for the squeaky, loud wheel over here who puts rationality and science aside because they want to make a statement."

Children, and teachers, also fell outside the reach of the greater good. The new law codifies that parents, not public schools, decide whether children should wear masks or get vaccinated. Parents who sue defiant schools that ignore the law can recoup their attorneys' fees if they succeed.

Luckily, DeSantis did not get everything he wanted. He pushed for an outright ban on vaccine mandates for private-sector employees and threatened to strip offending companies of their covid-19 liability protection, a rare anti-business gambit by the governor. But lawmakers, apparently haunted by visions of diminished campaign coffers, recoiled. It would have meant aggravating Disney, for example, which mandates vaccinations and masks for most employees at its sites.

Instead, Florida companies can require vaccinations as long as they offer five opt-outs: medical or religious exemptions, evidence of natural immunity from covid based on a medical test, or the willingness of the employee to be tested periodically or wear a mask. Exemptions under the new law also include pregnancy or "anticipating pregnancy," a vague term that presumably gives cover to practically all women in the workforce. If these alternatives are not offered, businesses risk fines of at least $10,000 per violation.

The Biden administration also offers exemptions, only they are narrower. Health-care and nursing-home workers can apply for religious or medical carve-outs. And other private-sector employees of large companies can opt out by getting tested every week.

The new Florida law also forces some businesses into a tug of war between the state and federal government. Hospitals, nursing homes and other care facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid stand to lose crucial funds if they don't adhere to Biden's vaccine mandate.

DeSantis and Republican legislators have abandoned any pretense of conservative opposition to big government, wresting control from schools, local governments and private companies — the entities that would know what's best for their own communities, employees and bottom lines. They are even planning a new agency, a state version of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, to skirt Biden's rules.

There is, however, a sliver of good news to come out of this not-so-special session: The legislation expires in June 2023. Let's hope by then it will have become irrelevant.
I keep hearing/reading stories like these which are heartbreaking:

https://www.newsweek.com/unvaccinated-pregnant-woman-tragically-dies-covid-after-baby-delivered-prematurely-1649786

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pregnant-nurse-who-refused-the-vaccine-loses-unborn-child-and-dies-from-covid-19/ar-AANJKDC

https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2021/5/7/22424708/pregnant-woman-covid-vaccine-hesitant-charmaine-bailey-avalon-park-chicago-cook-county-coronavirus

Here:  I received my booster shot yesterday after waiting about 45 minutes in a big box store.  I didn't have an appointment, but they managed to fit me in just fine without delaying anyone else (as far as I could tell).  Sore arm, but otherwise, feel fine.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 05:10:01 AM
Good to hear about your booster, and congrats!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 22, 2021, 05:16:20 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 05:10:01 AM
Good to hear about your booster, and congrats!
Thanks!   :)

PD

p.s.  Reminds me that I need to rescan my card, make a duplicate, and then tuck the original one back away (before it gets all crumpled and bedraggled in my purse).   I purposely went back to the same *store where I had received my original shots so that, should I lose card, I can easily pull up the info (plus also that QR code should I travel and need it).

*though I think that I would have been fine to just have gone to another store as it's part of a chain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 05:26:12 AM
In spite of the details, that was a quick & effective option for the 3rd jab! Here in DK, mine will probably be in January, 6 months after the 2nd. Some elderly family members above 70 are receiving it these days ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 22, 2021, 05:44:29 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 05:26:12 AM
In spite of the details, that was a quick & effective option for the 3rd jab! Here in DK, mine will probably be in January, 6 months after the 2nd. Some elderly family members above 70 are receiving it these days ...
Is it by appointment only in Denmark?  Here, it seems that it varies by pharmacy/organization.  I tried doing some checking around for a friend of mine who works a lot of hours.  He's determined to get it at only one pharmacy chain and to get the same vaccine, so it's making it a bit more difficult.  He could have received his booster shot at the same place that I went to (we were running around doing some errands together and they also had doses of his vaccine in addition to mine), but was too concerned that he would have a reaction to it and didn't want to risk missing any work.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 22, 2021, 05:53:07 AM
Here it's centrally organized, you can't decide yourself, until you get the call from the health authorities & some options for appointments.
They're hoping to speed procedures up a bit, but if children are going to be vaccinated here soon, that's probably going to strain the system as well. The EU approval of Pfizer vaccines for children is expected within a couple of weeks, and then the countries will make decisions.

My mother had a good deal of reactions to the first 2 shots (Pfizer), and zero to the 3rd ... it surely varies a lot, from person to person.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 22, 2021, 06:23:05 AM
Good on your booster, PD!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 22, 2021, 07:08:18 AM
Should 'fully vaccinated' now include a booster dose? Here's what the experts say

By Amanda Kaufman Globe Staff, Updated November 22, 2021, 2 hours ago

The Centers for Disease Control on Friday expanded COVID-19 booster eligibility to include all adults, clearing the way for millions more Americans to shore up protection against the virus.

Friday's decision, coupled with data showing that immunity due to the vaccines wanes over time, has raised questions about whether the expansion could pave the way for boosters to become part of the standard COVID-19 vaccination regimen.

Multiple experts said they think the COVID-19 vaccination program will eventually include three doses of an mRNA vaccine or two Johnson & Johnson doses — just not right away. They also emphasized that a more pressing matter is changing the course of the pandemic: Vaccinating those who remain unvaccinated, not deepening the level of protection for those who have already received shots of vaccines that are effective in preventing severe illness.

Under the current CDC guidelines, a person is considered fully vaccinated two weeks after their final shot in a two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen or after one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. Before last week, the CDC limited its recommendation for boosters to certain groups, including people 65 and older, those who received a Johnson & Johnson shot, people 50 and older with certain medical conditions, and adults who live in long-term care settings. The agency also said adults with certain medical conditions or those who live or work in high-risk settings may get them.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, has made the case for boosters to be used more widely, telling Axios that he envisions boosters becoming part of the vaccination series at some point.

"In my opinion, boosters are ultimately going to become part of the standard regimen and not just a bonus," Fauci told the publication.

Dr. Sabrina Assoumou, an infectious disease physician at Boston Medical Center and professor at Boston University School of Medicine, said she agrees, but stressed that the boosters are particularly important for certain vulnerable groups like those outlined in the CDC recommendations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 22, 2021, 09:30:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 22, 2021, 06:23:05 AM
Good on your booster, PD!
Thanks Karl!  Thankful that I was able to get it despite a bit of a wait; at one point, I was afraid that I would be waiting in vain, but it all turned out well, so I'm grateful!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 23, 2021, 07:16:59 AM
There are reasons to still avoid the office, but health concerns aren't among them

By Anissa Gardizy Globe Staff, Updated November 23, 2021, 2 hours ago

For the past six months, Massachusetts residents have been emerging from their pandemic shells, eating inside restaurants, going to concerts and sporting events, sweating at the gym again, and being around more people in close quarters of all kinds.

Some venues require face masks or proof of vaccination, but for the most part, in-person activities are relatively unrestrained compared with last year, even with a recent increase in virus cases as the weather cools and people move indoors.

Amid all this interpersonal activity, however, many offices remain empty.

Businesses have said they are monitoring COVID-19 metrics to decide when to bring their employees back, a mindset that led to a string of reopening delays in September due to the Delta variant of the virus. But health experts say there's nothing particularly risky about working in an office anymore, challenging the long-held belief by some that the coronavirus alone is a reason to continue to working from home.

"Implying that there is something different or more dangerous about offices is totally not true," said Dr. Shira Doron, an infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center

Health care workers, first responders, retail employees, and many others never stopped working in-person. Students and faculty, from elementary schools to colleges, are back in-person, too. And it's been nearly six months since state officials deemed that the pandemic warranted occupancy limits and social distancing for businesses.

Doron acknowledged the recent uptick in coronavirus cases in Massachusetts, but said it's a good sign that deaths and hospitalizations have not taken off on the same trajectory. To her, the state has moved into a "post-vaccination phase," where cases should be expected and not something that prohibits activities such as going to an office.

"I think this is what our new world is," Doron said. "If you are not willing to come into the office now, then one has to ask oneself, what would need to happen, and is that ever going to happen, for you to be comfortable?"

Dr. Andy Pekosz, a virologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said determining whether an office is safe "starts and almost ends with vaccination," since it's the best way to reduce risk. Of the more than 4.8 million vaccinated individuals in Massachusetts, just over one percent has experienced a breakthrough COVID-19 case, according to the latest data from the Department of Public Health.

Pekosz believes masks are still a good idea in group settings, and while people can't wear masks while eating in cafeterias or break rooms, that "shouldn't prevent us from going to the workplace."

It's no surprise that Joseph Allen of Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health thinks people can be back in offices. In his book "Healthy Buildings," he essentially wrote the manual for keeping people safe indoors. A building with a mostly vaccinated workforce and ventilation system that routinely refreshes the air is a low risk environment, according to Allen.

Martin Bazant, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said office buildings are one of the safest places for people to be, so avoiding them for health reasons doesn't make sense.

"Modern offices are likely safe to occupy fully right now, in many cases, without masks," said Bazant, who teaches chemical engineering and mathematics.

His assessment is based on an online tool he helped create last year that uses models to calculate probabilities of COVID-19 transmission in indoor spaces. It allows users to input various factors such as local prevalence of the virus and type of ventilation system.

"Given current levels of vaccination and infection prevalence in Boston today, the risk of actually dying during your transit to work from any other source, like a car accident, may be worse than dying of COVID," he said. "We have to make more quantitative assessments to decide whether we can resume normal life."

Several health experts said the fear of going back into the office solely because of health concerns is based on an irrational risk evaluation, not science. And when the Biden administration's vaccination and testing mandate for large employers goes into effect in January, they said, it will offer even more assurance that being around coworkers is not a health issue.

"There absolutely will be a time when someone really won't be justified to say, 'I'm not going to come into work because I'm afraid of the risk,'" said Pekosz, noting that Immunocompromised people and those who do not respond well to vaccines still must exercise caution

Most experts said working in an office isn't much different than other activities people are already engaging in, although it depends on how people behave in a specific situation. For instance, Doran said large meetings with food in an office would likely be riskier than wearing a mask in a grocery store, but safer than dining indoors where the vaccination status of other guests is usually unknown.

For some workers, it's getting to work by bus, subway, or train that is more worrisome than being in an office with colleagues. But Bazant said the fact that most people are vaccinated, can wear a mask, and are typically on public transportation for a short period of time, makes commuting less risky than it might seem.

"We all know how crowded the T can get, so certainly there are elevated risks, [but] the level of risk is not the same as it was a year ago," he said.

There are, of course, other reasons why employees may not want to go back to in-person work, at least not in the same way as they did before the pandemic. Doron, who consults with companies on back-to-work plans, said employers need to understand whether employees are worried about catching COVID-19 in a cubicle, or if their concerns involve issues such as childcare, the loss of flexible work schedules, and having to return to spending money and time commuting.

"[Companies] tell me that they have employees that are nervous about coming back...I'm sure they also have employees that are going to nightclubs," Doron said. "They may just like working from home."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 23, 2021, 07:19:28 AM
COVID cases in US children have risen 32% from two weeks ago, pediatricians say
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 23, 2021, 07:45:58 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 23, 2021, 07:19:28 AM
COVID cases in US children have risen 32% from two weeks ago, pediatricians say
Shudder!  Any idea what they translates to in terms of numbers Karl?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 23, 2021, 07:52:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 23, 2021, 07:45:58 AM
Shudder!  Any idea what they translates to in terms of numbers Karl?

PD

Not yet, looks like there's an article in the NY Times
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 08:45:14 AM
Quote from: Que on November 20, 2021, 10:13:48 AM
To top it all off: AZ does not appear to be the best vaccine.

No. Arguably not using AZ so much is one of the causes of the EUs woes at the moment.

https://www.ft.com/content/4492746e-6a14-4993-9c21-cd9c9f37eca4
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 08:46:39 AM
What's happening in France -- and I am keen to say that the only figures I can find are reported +ve test results -- but what's happening there suggests to me that in cold countries mask mandates aren't effective. Haven't checked Italy, Greece, Spain etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 23, 2021, 09:00:19 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 23, 2021, 07:52:39 AM
Not yet, looks like there's an article in the NY Times
I did find this on CNN's website (no paywall):  https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/22/health/covid-19-children-cases-up-again/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 23, 2021, 09:06:40 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on November 23, 2021, 09:00:19 AM
I did find this on CNN's website (no paywall):  https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/22/health/covid-19-children-cases-up-again/index.html

PD

Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 10:15:44 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 08:45:14 AM
No. Arguably not using AZ so much is one of the causes of the EUs woes at the moment.

https://www.ft.com/content/4492746e-6a14-4993-9c21-cd9c9f37eca4

And this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/23/astrazeneca-chief-links-europes-covid-surge-to-rejection-of-firms-vaccine?fr=operanews
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 23, 2021, 10:40:04 AM
COVID-19 cases have jumped 59 percent in New England in the past 2 weeks

By Martin Finucane, Felice J. Freyer and Ryan Huddle Globe Staff, Updated November 23, 2021, 7 minutes ago

The number of COVID-19 cases reported across New England has taken a sudden turn upward in recent weeks as the coronavirus has returned with a vengeance to the region after devastating the South this summer.

Seven-day average daily case numbers have increased over the past two weeks by 117 percent in Connecticut, 83 percent in Massachusetts, and 34 percent in Maine. Cases are up in Rhode Island by 32 percent, in New Hampshire by 29 percent, and in Vermont by 15 percent, according to data collected by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The seven-day average of daily new cases for all New England states combined has doubled in less than a month. In just the past two weeks, the number is up 59 percent, reaching 5,442 cases per day, according to CDC data updated Monday.

On a case per capita basis, every New England state is now above the national average, with New Hampshire more than twice as high — 65.0 cases per 100,000 residents — compared with the national average of 27.4 cases per 100,000.

The increases come after a September spike in New England had appeared to be subsiding. They are arriving as the weather is turning colder, national case numbers are turning up, and officials are calling for all adults to get boosters to shore up the waning immunity from their original shots.

"Heading into the winter months when respiratory viruses are more likely to spread and with plans for increased holiday season travel and gathering, boosting people's overall protection against COVID-19 disease and death was important to do now," Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a White House briefing Monday.

Experts and officials are hoping that, because of high vaccination rates in New England, case increases will not result in the same level of hospitalizations and deaths as they have in previous COVID surges.

Dr. David B. Banach, hospital epidemiologist at UConnHealth in Farmington, Connecticut, said that cases are milder, especially among vaccinated people. "Hospitalization rates have not been increasing at the same rate as new cases. That provides good evidence that the vaccine is working," he said.

That's why a COVID-19 case in November 2021 is viewed differently from a COVID-19 case in November 2020. "We're not seeing the severe infections rise at the same rate," Banach said.

Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said no one knows why cases are increasing in the Northeast.

"This is part of the mystery of the surges we see with COVID-19, why they start and why they stop — we don't know," he said. "We do know that vaccination and mitigation can reduce the impact of the surge."

"There is less severe illness, less deaths," he said. "At the same time, it points out the fact that this virus is still extracting a very large toll on us."

"The vast majority of us are done with this pandemic," Osterholm said. "The problem is, it's not done with us."

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, referencing a national map of new cases at a briefing Monday, said, "It's a sort of a mirror image of where you were, say, 90 days ago where the South — Florida and Georgia, Texas, Alabama — were on fire, and we were, you know, very, very low infection. Now, given seasonality and the flu season as such, that has shifted around a little bit.

"We're much better prepared than we were a year ago, much better prepared than we've been. We've got the vaccine. We've got the boosters. We've got the masks. We're going to get through this, no question about it. Let's make sure that the next wave is the most mild of all," said Lamont, whose state currently has the highest increase in daily cases in the country but still has the lowest per capita rate in New England, 20.7 cases per 100,000.

Officials have warned that unvaccinated people face much higher risks. The CDC says that, according to data collected from about two dozen US jurisdictions, unvaccinated people had 5.8 times the risk of contracting COVID-19 and 14 times the risk of dying from the disease.

"Infections among the unvaccinated continue to drive this pandemic — hospitalizations, and deaths — tragically, at a time when we have vaccines that can provide incredible protection," Walensky said at the White House briefing.

Asked last week about case increases in Massachusetts, Governor Charlie Baker's administration emphasized the successes of the state's vaccination program. "Massachusetts leads the nation in getting residents vaccinated with 95% of all adults with one dose, and has one of the lowest COVID hospitalization rates in the country," a Department of Health and Human Services spokeswoman said in a statement.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 23, 2021, 10:42:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 08:45:14 AM
No. Arguably not using AZ so much is one of the causes of the EUs woes at the moment.

https://www.ft.com/content/4492746e-6a14-4993-9c21-cd9c9f37eca4

Quote from: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 10:15:44 AM
And this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/23/astrazeneca-chief-links-europes-covid-surge-to-rejection-of-firms-vaccine?fr=operanews

The AZ vaccine was the closest one could get to a classical vaccine (the ones we all got in our childhood)*, was developed by an Anglo-Swedish venture and was the cheapest of them all. Three more than enough reasons to kill it.

Btw, it would be interesting to see if and how the ongoing scandal about the dubious contracts Ursula von der Leyen signed on behalf of the EU with Pfizer, and the huge conflict of interest of her husband in this respect, will develop.

*not that it is perfect and without problems, mind you

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 23, 2021, 11:53:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 23, 2021, 10:15:44 AM
And this

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/23/astrazeneca-chief-links-europes-covid-surge-to-rejection-of-firms-vaccine?fr=operanews

The
Quote from: Florestan on November 23, 2021, 10:42:00 AM
The AZ vaccine was the closest one could get to a classical vaccine (the ones we all got in our childhood)*, was developed by an Anglo-Swedish venture and was the cheapest of them all. Three more than enough reasons to kill it.

*not that it is perfect and without problems, mind you

Interesting! Sofar it seems a claim that is met with scepticism, but it could be an important development.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 23, 2021, 11:58:29 AM
Quote from: Que on November 23, 2021, 11:53:33 AM
a claim that is met with scepticism,

(I assume you refer to the von der Leyen family / Pfizer scandal)

By who?

Quote
but it could be an important development.

I for one eagerly await it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 23, 2021, 12:05:55 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 23, 2021, 11:58:29 AM
(I assume you refer to the von der Leyen family / Pfizer scandal)

No. Haven't read anything about.

QuoteBy who?

Read the linked Guardian article.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 23, 2021, 12:17:26 PM
Quote from: Que on November 23, 2021, 12:05:55 PM
No. Haven't read anything about.

https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-pfizer-text-messages-ombudsman/ (https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-pfizer-text-messages-ombudsman/)

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/world/europe/european-union-pfizer-von-der-leyen-coronavirus-vaccine.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/world/europe/european-union-pfizer-von-der-leyen-coronavirus-vaccine.html)

Plus, a Romanian parliamentary party has filed an official complaint to the office of the European Chief Prosecutor asking for the matter to be thoroughly investigated (Romanian only, Google Translate may help):

https://www.agerpres.ro/politica/2021/11/23/aur-solicita-parchetului-european-sa-investigheze-modul-in-care-s-a-facut-contractarea-vaccinurilor-anti-covid-19--819109 (https://www.agerpres.ro/politica/2021/11/23/aur-solicita-parchetului-european-sa-investigheze-modul-in-care-s-a-facut-contractarea-vaccinurilor-anti-covid-19--819109)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 23, 2021, 05:55:29 PM
quoting in full:

Treatments will change the pandemic, but they can't end it alone
Antiviral pills will be a key part of a large toolkit needed to manage the coronavirus, not a silver bullet (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/11/21/pandemic-antiviral-pills/)

"A year after coronavirus vaccines dangled visions of an end to the pandemic, science has delivered inspiring results again: two antiviral pills that dramatically reduce the risk of hospitalization and death.

The notion that a fearsome infection could soon be treatable with a handful of pills is an exhilarating idea nearly two years into a pandemic that has killed more than 5 million people, at least 770,000 in the United States. But experts — who are thrilled about the prospect of two powerful new medicines — worry that enthusiasm for the idea of treatments may distract from their limitations and the necessity of preventing illness in the first place.

If regulators deem the five-day treatment courses from Pfizer and Merck and its partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics safe and effective in coming weeks, as most people expect, the drugs could make getting sick far less scary. The United States has already prepurchased millions of treatments. The good news arrives like an echo of last year, when two remarkably effective vaccines were authorized in the middle of the holiday season as a winter surge in new cases loomed.

But these treatments alone aren't likely to close the book on the coronavirus. Instead, they will be a valuable addition to an armamentarium that the world is going to have to keep building and maintaining in the long run: vaccines, booster shots, more antiviral pills, virus-fighting antibodies engineered to stick around in people's bodies and fast-turnaround testing linked to treatment options.

"It's a huge part of the toolbox; if we can move everything upstream, instead of trying to treat hospitalized patients with late-stage severe disease," said David Boulware, an infectious-disease physician at the University of Minnesota Medical School. "I'm an optimist. Six months from now, I think things are going to be great."

Drugs that can be taken at home to keep mildly sick people from ending up in the hospital will be a turning point. But a major lesson of the pandemic has been that around each corner are more corners.

Remember, the vaccines were better than anyone expected. But more people in the United States, where vaccines are plentiful, have died of covid-19 in 2021, after shots became available, than in the year before.

Antivirals, too, will be powerful but won't be a get-out-of-jail-free card by themselves.

Initially, they will be available to people at increased risk of severe illness due to age or other factors. People will need to recognize their symptoms early, get tested and start treatments right away.

The drugs are good, but not perfect: Merck and Ridgeback's molnupiravir slashed hospitalization and death by half in a clinical trial, but that means some people still ended up in the hospital. Pfizer's Paxlovid reduced hospitalization and death rates by an impressive 89 percent, but it must be taken within days of symptoms.

And scientists have learned not to underestimate the virus. As soon as treatments become widespread, scientists will be watching for signs of resistance.

"There's always a sense of optimism with a new strategy that comes along, and I'm optimistic, too, that this is one additional thing that is going to help in our fight against this disease," said Erica Johnson, chair of the Infectious Disease Board of the American Board of Internal Medicine and a physician at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. "But I'm also cautious that it is just a single strategy, and it really only works if all the other strategies are healthy and working, too."

Carl Dieffenbach, director of the Division of AIDS at the National Institutes of Health, has spent decades battling a different virus, overseeing a $1 billion global research portfolio focused on HIV. Although the long quest for a vaccine has been unsuccessful so far, the disease has been transformed by treatments and prevention strategies. Now, he is trying to apply some of that thinking to covid-19.

No one is willing to outline a minimum threshold of treatments needed against a virus that has been so continually surprising, but when pressed, Dieffenbach says that coronavirus treatments that will soon be reviewed by regulators are "a good start" — not the end.

It's important to build an arsenal of drugs that use different techniques to stop the virus. One class of drugs can block the coronavirus from entering cells, as monoclonal antibodies already in use are designed to do. Another class, like Pfizer's drug, could interfere with proteases, enzymes that the virus uses to process its proteins. A third, like Merck and Ridgeback's molnupiravir, could interfere with a different enzyme the virus uses to make copies of itself.

Dieffenbach thinks all three angles of attack will be needed, as well as backups for each strategy and cocktails that combine them, to avoid allowing the virus to sneak past the protection given by any individual treatment.

"Six [treatments] at a minimum. Nine would be better. Twelve would be even better," Dieffenbach said. "We need the companies to make the drugs at scale, as available as aspirin and Tylenol — metric kilotons."

Both Pfizer and Merck have begun scaling up their pills before they have received a regulatory green light. Pfizer plans to make 50 million treatment courses in 2022. Merck projects having 10 million treatment courses ready by the end of this year, and more in 2022. The United States has pre-purchased about 3.1 million treatment courses from Merck and 10 million from Pfizer.

The question now on many scientists' mind is how the virus will respond as those drugs go into widespread use. Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University School of Medicine, sees combinations of drugs as the future — particularly for people with compromised immune systems who can have covid-19 infections that simmer for weeks or months, allowing the virus to mutate.

"If we have a combination, an antiviral cocktail, it might protect against the emergence of these mutations," Iwasaki said.

Iwasaki and colleagues recently reported a preprint case study of a woman in her 70s whose cancer had weakened her immune system. The patient was sick for six months with persistent covid-19, and during her treatment received a course of remdesivir, an intravenous antiviral medication. At first, her fever resolved and levels of the virus dropped — until a mutation that gave the virus resistance to remdesivir allowed it to surge back.

In this case, the resistant virus that was able to thrive in the presence of remdesivir wasn't going to take over the world — it was less adept at multiplying than the original strain. But the case illustrates the risk of new variants arising after treatment.

To protect immunocompromised people, other companies — including AstraZeneca and Adagio Therapeutics — are trying another angle of attack: laboratory-brewed monoclonal antibodies that have been engineered to stick around in the blood for a long time, with the idea that they could provide a shot of long-term protection, similar to a vaccine. Regeneron recently released data showing that its monoclonal antibody cocktail, currently authorized as a treatment for people infected or recently exposed, remains about 80 percent effective against symptomatic infections eight months later, bolstering the case for its drug as a preventive for people who don't respond well to vaccines.

"For us, vaccination has been the jailbreaker; it has allowed us to live life normally," said Hugh Montgomery, a professor of intensive care medicine at University College London leading a trial of the AstraZeneca drug, which has been submitted to U.S. regulators for emergency authorization. "My sister, who has breast cancer and has just got 18 weeks of chemotherapy and can't mount an antibody response to the vaccine — as we've lifted our lockdown, she's become a prisoner in her house."

Instead of one drug or one solution, there will probably be treatment niches — and the market opportunity isn't a one-time flare; it's what pharmaceutical executives call "durable."

On a recent earnings call, Pfizer chief executive Albert Bourla said that he sees a years-long market for antiviral pills. As long as the world needs vaccines, it will also need treatments.

"As long as you have covid around, you will have a need to vaccinate and protect and then you will have a need to treat and save lives," Bourla said.

Alongside medical tools, Dieffenbach is calling for a societal shift — a new normal in which people with respiratory symptoms test as soon as symptoms appear and start drugs within three to five days.

"What I'm advocating for is a fundamental change in approach," Dieffenbach said. "In the future, we don't require people to go to the doctor if they're feeling sick to get tested. There's a rapid test you do at home. People are motivated to get a prescription, or already have a prescription so they can start taking it right away. That's where we're going to have to get to."

Even as experts anticipate the arrival of lifesaving drugs, they worry. Will people use the existence of medicines as an excuse to avoid vaccination or boosters? Will people who could clearly benefit — those who have avoided the vaccines — seek out testing at the first sign of a sore throat and get access to drugs quickly enough?

Doctors are hopeful that people will realize that avoiding sickness altogether is the best option. Boulware said one colleague puts it this way: Syphilis is treatable with penicillin. But it is far better to not get it in the first place.

"It's almost like applying the correct tool for the task at hand. Treatments are going to play a backup role to vaccines," said Rajesh Gandhi, an infectious-diseases physician at Massachusetts General Hospital.

The existence of treatments could also trigger the start of a philosophical discussion on how to deal with sickness itself. Pre-covid, people hopped on flights and went to school and work with runny noses and coughs. If people go back to old habits, it may be hard to identify and treat people early enough in their illness.

"I don't think we're going back to just ignoring people who are sick," said Larry Corey, a virologist and past president of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. "Coming to school or coming to work and just assuming that no matter what, it's not going to hurt you."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 23, 2021, 11:08:56 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 23, 2021, 05:55:29 PM

Even as experts anticipate the arrival of lifesaving drugs, they worry. Will people use the existence of medicines as an excuse to avoid vaccination or boosters? Will people who could clearly benefit — those who have avoided the vaccines — seek out testing at the first sign of a sore throat and get access to drugs quickly enough?

Doctors are hopeful that people will realize that avoiding sickness altogether is the best option. Boulware said one colleague puts it this way: Syphilis is treatable with penicillin. But it is far better to not get it in the first place.

Good to have medication to clear the hospitals and have a treatment for cases in which people cannot be vaccinated or vaccination is not effective. But the risk this will undermine the vaccination effort and will be used by people as an excuse not to be vaccinated, is my concern as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 06:33:42 AM
As expected, many new restrictions will now be implemented here in DK, including obligatory masks under many circumstances, a maximum in public gatherings, corona pass including in eating places and state working places, PCR passes given shorter validity, etc.

It's a rather comprehensive packet.

The virus is expanding particularly among school children and unvaccinated, including their parents, etc.

Hopefully cases will drop say within a couple of weeks or so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 24, 2021, 06:34:53 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 06:33:42 AM
As expected, many new restrictions will now be implemented here in DK, including obligatory masks under many circumstances, a maximum in public gatherings, corona pass including in eating places and state working places, PCR passes given shorter validity, etc.

It's a rather comprehensive packet.

The virus is expanding particularly among school children and unvaccinated, including their parents, etc.

Hopefully cases will drop say within a couple of weeks or so.

Here's hoping!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 24, 2021, 10:01:57 AM
Beth Teitell: Meanwhile, with traditional sources of information insufficient, some people are turning to the supernatural.

In Charlestown, on Tarot card readings done over Zoom, psychic MaryLee Trettenero warned two separate clients concerned about COVID not to fly home for the holiday, and they didn't. "I had a bad feeling about it," she said.

Finally, some clarity!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 24, 2021, 10:28:27 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 06:33:42 AM
As expected, many new restrictions will now be implemented here in DK, including obligatory masks under many circumstances, a maximum in public gatherings, corona pass including in eating places and state working places, PCR passes given shorter validity, etc.

It's a rather comprehensive packet.

The virus is expanding particularly among school children and unvaccinated, including their parents, etc.

Hopefully cases will drop say within a couple of weeks or so.

What is the DK government's plan for ending this eternal cycle restrictions? Cases drop in a couple of weeks, say, and . . . then what?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 10:48:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 24, 2021, 10:28:27 AM
What is the DK government's plan for ending this eternal cycle restrictions? Cases drop in a couple of weeks, say, and . . . then what?

... we can look forward to Springtime. But restrictions have actually been less strict and longlasting in DK, compared to some countries.

Among other things, they are expecting the 3rd jab (and likely children's vaccines plus oncoming vaccines, including Danish ones with new methods etc) to have an effect, as well as the improved treatment options. They've already ordered big supplies of the Pfizer pills.

To repeat: the policy has been to reduce fatalities (total mortality has been normal) and reduce pressure on the health system, until the disease is less prominent and dangerous. This has succeeded so far, the negative side effects have apparently been limited, and the economy is doing very well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 24, 2021, 11:04:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 10:48:13 AM
... we can look forward to Springtime. But restrictions have actually been less strict and longlasting in DK, compared to some countries.

Among other things, they are expecting the 3rd jab (and likely children's vaccines plus oncoming vaccines, including Danish ones with new methods etc) to have an effect, as well as the improved treatment options. They've already ordered big supplies of the Pfizer pills.

To repeat: the policy has been to reduce fatalities (total mortality has been normal) and reduce pressure on the health system, until the disease is less prominent and dangerous. This has succeeded so far, the negative side effects have apparently been limited, and the economy is doing very well.

The third jab for some adults should have an effect. I'm less sure that giving vaccines to the kids is the right thing to do from a global point of view.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 11:13:34 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 24, 2021, 11:04:07 AM
The third jab for some adults should have an effect. I'm less sure that giving vaccines to the kids is the right thing to do from a global point of view.

At a presser here, one of the expert statements was 'Delta is NOT for children'.   (Brostrøm).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 24, 2021, 11:26:53 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 24, 2021, 11:13:34 AM
At a presser here, one of the expert statements were 'Delta is NOT for children'.   (Brostrøm).

Yes is designed to have an emotional effect. What's on my mind is whether it's the best use of the vaccine, or whether it should be sent to developing countries for adults instead. Vaccinating children will no doubt have an important effect on incidence, but in a population where the adults are vaccinated, it may not have such a significant effect on serious disease.

But the issue is complex -- there is also the question of the benefit/risk equation for the children themselves, health benefit and social/educational benefit. And then there is the whole difficult area of long covid. Add to that the uncertainties concerning distribution in the third world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 24, 2021, 02:49:18 PM
Santa Cruz County reinstates indoor mask mandate (https://www.kcra.com/article/santa-cruz-county-reinstates-indoor-mask-mandate/38321511#)

QuoteThe health officer order even requires masks to be worn in private settings, including homes, when people who are not from the household are present.

How does enforcement work?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 24, 2021, 04:00:22 PM
Courtesy of our man in Brigham & Women's:

A higher rate of stillbirths has been associated with Covid-19 (2x).

Delta made it even worse (4x).

Vaccinating pregnant women is ESSENTIAL for the health of the mother and the fetus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 24, 2021, 05:41:26 PM
I was wondering why there were no exemptions for pregnant women.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 12:49:16 AM
Quote from: Todd on November 24, 2021, 02:49:18 PM
Santa Cruz County reinstates indoor mask mandate (https://www.kcra.com/article/santa-cruz-county-reinstates-indoor-mask-mandate/38321511#)

How does enforcement work?

It doesn't. Such a mandate is ludicrous.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 04:06:40 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 12:49:16 AM
It doesn't. Such a mandate is ludicrous.

The fact that (legal) enforcement does not (and cannot) work for such mandates does not quite make them ludicrous. For one thing, the existence of the state of emergency that makes the mandate possible does make some folks more likely to mask up in situations where it applies. Here in Vermont there has been, since the statewide state of emergency expired this past spring and the Governor pointedly refused to reinstate it even as Delta became the dominant strain and led to the major surge we are seeing now, a very large proportion of the populace that just doesn't bother with masks anymore in places like grocery stores and restaurants. I would estimate that 70% of the people I see in stores around here are maskless, and have been maskless since the state of emergency / statewide mask mandate was lifted. Before then, the numbers were roughly reversed.

For another, it gives businesses a little more weight behind any mask mandate they might decide to impose. They can always back it up with "by order of the Governor".

Personally, I wish he would do so. The current wave is proceeding at full tilt with little sign of abatement, and people are still behaving largely as if the pandemic were over.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 04:15:12 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 04:06:40 AM
The fact that (legal) enforcement does not (and cannot) work for such mandates does not quite make them ludicrous.

By ludicrous I mean this part:

Under the rules, everyone regardless of vaccination status must wear a mask in indoor public settings, as well as in private settings including homes when non-household members are present.

So, I invite some friends to my home for a party or a talk and we must all wear masks. Seriously? How do you enforce this?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 05:10:04 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 04:15:12 AM
By ludicrous I mean this part:

Under the rules, everyone regardless of vaccination status must wear a mask in indoor public settings, as well as in private settings including homes when non-household members are present.

So, I invite some friends to my home for a party or a talk and we must all wear masks. Seriously? How do you enforce this?

Obviously, you don't. I presume the purpose behind such mandates is to encourage people who might not be paying close attention to take the situation seriously. To the well-informed and wise, such mandates are meaningless because they would self-impose those restrictions regardless, as being in their own best interest and that of the people around them. Idiots aren't known to act in their own best interest anyway, and trying to get them to comply with that sort of mandate is a fool's errand. I think a dictum like this is for everyone else, really, as a way of saying: listen up, we're in an emergency, and this is what you should do for your own safety and that of your loved ones.

It's really just guidance, but it tends to be more influential if dressed up as a "mandate". At least, that's been my experience in this little corner of the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 25, 2021, 05:13:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 04:15:12 AMSo, I invite some friends to my home for a party or a talk and we must all wear masks. Seriously? How do you enforce this?

So, how's Romania doing with controlling the virus? Cases coming down?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 05:31:22 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 25, 2021, 05:13:44 AM
So, how's Romania doing with controlling the virus? Cases coming down?

Yes. Cases and deaths as well. Some restrictions in place (for instance, no jab, no entry in malls*, restaurants, cinemas and some other places --- which btw is illegal and unconstitutional, indoor masks mandatory in public places only, curfew for the unvaccinated between 22 and 5 etc).

*there's an ongoing scandal after Kaufland installed separation fences between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in their locations. They have been fined and ordered to remove them.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 05:46:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 04:15:12 AM
By ludicrous I mean this part:

Under the rules, everyone regardless of vaccination status must wear a mask in indoor public settings, as well as in private settings including homes when non-household members are present.

So, I invite some friends to my home for a party or a talk and we must all wear masks. Seriously? How do you enforce this?

It would make a good scene in a film by Buñuel.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 05:48:11 AM


I think it was a stroke of genius on Britain's part to let the virus rip from July, creating the wave of hospital admissions and deaths in the warmer months. You can see how EU is in a mess now and really panicking - whether it be this last minute booster programme in France or the rediculous, dangerous, plan to mandate vaccinations by law for whole populations. Everything that has happened in the UK with covid has been exemplary since January 2021 - it's only because we vaccinated so many in Spring that we could let it rip in Summer. The other countries just weren't there. All praise to JCVI and the government for trusting them.

Even the booster programme here has been managed better than any other first world country. I don't count Israel.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 05:50:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 05:46:38 AM
It would make a good scene in a film by Buñuel.

:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 25, 2021, 05:57:27 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 04:06:40 AMThe fact that (legal) enforcement does not (and cannot) work for such mandates does not quite make them ludicrous.


Yes, it does.  Any government agency at any level mandating behavior such as this is ludicrous on its face.  In the US it is almost certainly unconstitutional.  No government agency enjoys that enumerated power.  The probability of the mandate reaching SCOTUS is basically nil, so there will unfortunately be no precedent to rely on in the future.

In addition to being ludicrous, the order is also obscene.  However, as been seen all over the world, not inconsiderable segments of the population now blindly follow the state in its irrational public health authoritarianism.  Many people then offer defenses of said authoritarianism, and quite happily at that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 25, 2021, 08:08:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 05:48:11 AM

I think it was a stroke of genius on Britain's part to let the virus rip from July, creating the wave of hospital admissions and deaths in the warmer months.

???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 08:10:25 AM
Quote from: Que on November 25, 2021, 08:08:25 AM
???

Cat got your tongue?

The thought is that you Europeans are going to either have to keep locked down again, or see that wave NOW! IN WINTER! Which is probably not an option.

Botswana is a bit worrying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 09:14:24 AM
Quote from: Todd on November 25, 2021, 05:57:27 AM
as been seen all over the world, not inconsiderable segments of the population now blindly follow the state in its irrational public health authoritarianism.  Many people then offer defenses of said authoritarianism, and quite happily at that.

Both phenomena are highly worrisome for me --- not least because I have a scary feeling of déja-vu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 12:26:20 PM
Britain has closed its boarders with several African countries over fear of new variant




https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59424269
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on November 25, 2021, 12:43:56 PM
We have to get somehow to the point were hardly any people get seriously sick of Covid-19 and end up in hospitals, especially in intensive care.
When that happens, nobody cares about the virus anymore. The question is how long will it take before we get to that point? Six months? A year? 5 years? 20 years?

The situation is quite bad in Finland. 2020 was childs play compared to now. I think people are so tired of the pandemic they don't care if they die. Is this existence worth it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 12:51:35 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 12:26:20 PM
Britain has closed its boarders with several African countries over fear of new variant




https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59424269

One might as well close any country's border with each and every other country over fear of new variant.

No, really, this is going more and more insane. Governments which for decades have been tolerating toxic chemicals in food, toxic chemicals in drinking water, toxic chemicals in breathing air, for decades have been tolerating the manipulative and unethical behaviour of Big Pharma, for decades have been tolerating large multinational corporations to push aside national small and miedium-sized companies thus contributiing to the impoverishment of the national middle class, for decades have shown utter and complete disregard for the interests and grievances of their own citizens and have been eagerly and lucratvely promoting the interests of global capitalism --- those selfsame governments have suddenly turned into genuine humanitarians greatly concerned with, and working hard to protect, their people's health. How any rational and reasonable person can believe them, let alone applaud and support whatever liberticide (sic!) policies they implement, is beyond my comprehension powers.

Heck, until recently here on GMG there were quite a few vocal and acerbic critics of Big Pharma's manipulative and unethical behaviour --- yet they have been either quiet ever since the vaccination frenzy started, or enthusiastic supporters thereof. Am I really the only one to feel a cognitive dissonance in this respect?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 01:05:05 PM
https://twitter.com/tuliodna/status/1463911554538160130?s=21

The above tweet from the director of Centre for Epidemic Response & innovation, South Africa, seems absolutely right to me.

QuoteI would like to plea to all billionaires in this world
@elonmusk

@BillGates

@JeffBezos

@DrPatSoonShiong

@WarrenBuffett
to support Africa & South Africa financially to control and extinguish variants! By protecting its poor and oppressed population we will protect the world.

I also want to plea to financial organizations
@WorldBank

@IMFNews

@USAID

@PEPFAR

@GlobalFund
to support the poor population and governments in South Africa and Africa to control and extinguish variants! By protecting its poor and oppressed population we will protect the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on November 25, 2021, 01:07:14 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 12:51:35 PM
One might as well close any country's border with each and every other country over fear of new variant.

No, really, this is going more and more insane. Governments which for decades have been tolerating toxic chemicals in food, toxic chemicals in drinking water, toxic chemicals in breathing air, for decades have been tolerating the manipulative and unethical behaviour of Big Pharma, for decades have been tolerating large multinational corporations to push aside national small and miedium-sized companies thus contributiing to the impoverishment of the national middle class, for decades have shown utter and complete disregard for the interests and grievances of their own citizens and have been eagerly and lucratvely promoting the interests of global capitalism --- those selfsame governments have suddenly turned into genuine humanitarians greatly concerned with, and working hard to protect, their people's health. How any rational and reasonable person can believe them, let alone applaud and support whatever liberticide (sic!) policies they implement, is beyond my comprehension powers.

Heck, until recently here on GMG there were quite a few vocal and acerbic critics of Big Pharma's manipulative and unethical behaviour --- yet they have been either quiet ever since the vaccination frenzy started, or enthusiastic supporters thereof. Am I really the only one to feel a cognitive dissonance in this respect?

The cognitive dissonance arises only if there's evidence "Big Pharma" is doing anything manipulative or unethical in relation to the vaccine. To date I've seen absolutely none.

To your larger point--almost everything  you listed does not lend itself to headlines and photographs of mass death in hospitals. Covid19 does.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 01:10:20 PM
Quote from: Todd on November 25, 2021, 05:57:27 AM
In addition to being ludicrous, the order is also obscene.  However, as been seen all over the world, not inconsiderable segments of the population now blindly follow the state in its irrational public health authoritarianism.  Many people then offer defenses of said authoritarianism, and quite happily at that.

And if I took the mandate literally as an order constraining what I might do in my private space, I would feel similarly. Funny thing, I take it as guidance, nothing less, nothing more, and I'm perfectly happy to comply.

It seems those who speak out most loudly against this are people with memories of a different time when the authoritarian state intruded into private life in a way that free societies must never tolerate. But I think it's misplaced to equate the two situations, largely because, as Florestan has pointed out, today's mandates in Europe and North America are impossible to enforce in any meaningful way.

I'd feel very differently if the government actually tried to enforce it somehow, say by imposing fines and encouraging citizens to inform on their neighbors. That would be a bridge too far. And if that happened, I'm quite sure you would see legal challenges and the cases might ultimately reach SCOTUS.

But it's not happening, so that is not going to happen.

I'm much more concerned about authoritarianism rising in the person of elected heads of state with delusions of grandeur and serious conflicts of interest, than I am about public health "mandates" with no teeth that have a net positive effect on getting people to behave in their own best interest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 01:14:26 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 01:05:05 PM
https://twitter.com/tuliodna/status/1463911554538160130?s=21

The above tweet from the director of Centre for Epidemic Response & innovation, South Africa, seems absolutely right to me.

He missed Bill Gates, who in each and every interview since March 2020 have been speaking as authoritatively as if he were the Health Minister of the World.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 25, 2021, 01:22:29 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 25, 2021, 01:14:26 PM
He missed Bill Gates, who in each and every interview since March 2020 have been speaking as authoritatively as if he were the Health Minister of the World.  ;D

The problem I have is that if this new variant does turn out to be very nasty and dominates delta, a quarantine mandate is likely to be ineffective. It will get into the UK eventually - that's the lesson with alpha and delta, and NZ too! It may buy a bit of time, but what are we going to do with that time? The quarantine mandate is just a bit of theatre, useless.

It may be as that only real solution is a big one - we have to vaccinate the whole world, with a vaccine that stops transmission - we don't have the vaccine and the world is big and Pfizer want to make a profit.

And if that's right, what happens politically and economically in the interim, as the transmission stopping vaccine is being developed and then rolled out?

We're all doomed. It's endzeit everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 25, 2021, 02:54:45 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 01:10:20 PMFunny thing, I take it as guidance, nothing less, nothing more, and I'm perfectly happy to comply.


There are always people perfectly happy to comply with ludicrous government mandates.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 25, 2021, 03:41:48 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 01:10:20 PM
And if I took the mandate literally as an order constraining what I might do in my private space, I would feel similarly. Funny thing, I take it as guidance, nothing less, nothing more, and I'm perfectly happy to comply.

And the guidance is well-advised, because the presumption that people are just going to do the sensible thing on their own is catastrophically gainsaid by the tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths in Texas and Florida, e.g. The motto of whose State Depts of Health seems to be: Everyone is going to die, anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 25, 2021, 04:26:15 PM
Variant showing a 'big jump in evolution' detected in South Africa — 5:35 p.m.

By The New York Times

A concerning new variant of the coronavirus, whose mutations evidence a "big jump in evolution," is driving a spike in new COVID-19 infections in South Africa, scientists said Thursday.

In the last 36 hours after observing an increase in infections in South Africa's economic hub, the Gauteng province, scientists detected the B1.1.529 variant. So far, 22 positive cases have been identified in South Africa, according to South Africa's National Institute for Communicable Diseases.

Since the onset of the pandemic, a number of variants have emerged. One underlying concern about new variants is whether they will stymie progress against the pandemic or whether they will limit the vaccine's effectiveness. South African scientists will meet with the World Health Organization technical team on Friday, where authorities will assign a letter of the Greek alphabet to this one.

Botswana's health ministry confirmed in a statement that four cases of the new variant were detected in people who were all fully vaccinated. All four were tested before their planned travel. One sample was also detected in Hong Kong, carried by a traveler from South Africa, South African scientists said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 25, 2021, 04:39:16 PM
South African scientists detect new virus variant amid spike

By Andrew Meldrum and Mogomotsi Magome | AP
Today at 4:26 p.m. EST

JOHANNESBURG — A new coronavirus variant has been detected in South Africa that scientists say is a concern because of its high number of mutations and rapid spread among young people in Gauteng, the country's most populous province, Health Minister Joe Phaahla announced Thursday.

The coronavirus evolves as it spreads and many new variants, including those with worrying mutations, often just die out. Scientists monitor for possible changes that could be more transmissible or deadly, but sorting out whether new variants will have a public health impact can take time.

South Africa has seen a dramatic rise in new infections, Phaahla said at an online press briefing.

"Over the last four or five days, there has been more of an exponential rise," he said, adding that the new variant appears to be driving the spike in cases. Scientists in South Africa are working to determine what percentage of the new cases have been caused by the new variant.

Currently identified as B.1.1.529, the new variant has also been found in Botswana and Hong Kong in travelers from South Africa, he said.

The World Health Organization's technical working group is to meet Friday to assess the new variant and may decide whether or not to give it a name from the Greek alphabet.

The British government announced that it was banning flights from South Africa and five other southern African countries effective at noon (1200GMT) on Friday, and that anyone who had recently arrived from those countries would be asked to take a coronavirus test.

U.K. Health Secretary Sajid Javid said there were concerns the new variant "may be more transmissible" than the dominant delta strain, and "the vaccines that we currently have may be less effective" against it.

The new variant has a "constellation" of new mutations, said Tulio de Oliveira, from the Network for Genomic Surveillance in South Africa, who has tracked the spread of the delta variant in the country.

The "very high number of mutations is a concern for predicted immune evasion and transmissibility," said de Oliveira.

"This new variant has many, many more mutations," including more than 30 to the spike protein that affects transmissibility, he said. "We can see that the variant is potentially spreading very fast. We do expect to start seeing pressure in the healthcare system in the next few days and weeks."

De Oliveira said that a team of scientists from seven South African universities is studying the variant. They have 100 whole genomes of it and expect to have many more in the next few days, he said.

"We are concerned by the jump in evolution in this variant," he said. The one piece of good news is that it can be detected by a PCR test, he said.

After a period of relatively low transmission in which South Africa recorded just over 200 new confirmed cases per day, in the past week the daily new cases rapidly increased to more than 1,200 on Wednesday. On Thursday they jumped to 2,465.

The first surge was in Pretoria and the surrounding Tshwane metropolitan area and appeared to be cluster outbreaks from student gatherings at universities in the area, said health minister Phaahla. Amid the rise in cases, scientists studied the genomic sequencing and discovered the new variant.

"This is clearly a variant that we must be very serious about," said Ravindra Gupta, professor of clinical microbiology at the University of Cambridge. "It has a high number of spike mutations that could affect transmissibility and immune response."

Gupta said scientists in South Africa need time to determine if the surge in new cases is attributable to the new variant. "There is a high probability that this is the case," he said. "South African scientists have done an incredible job of identifying this quickly and bringing it to the world's attention."

South African officials had warned that a new resurgence was expected from mid-December to early January and had hoped to prepare for that by getting many more people vaccinated, said Phaahla.

About 41% of South Africa's adults have been vaccinated and the number of shots being given per day is relatively low, at less than 130,000, significantly below the government's target of 300,000 per day.

South Africa currently has about 16.5 million doses of vaccines, by Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, in the country and is expecting delivery of about 2.5 million more in the next week, according to Nicholas Crisp, acting director-general of the national health department.

"We are getting in vaccines faster than we are using them at the moment," said Crisp. "So for some time now, we have been deferring deliveries, not decreasing orders, but just deferring our deliveries so that we don't accumulate and stockpile vaccines."

South Africa, with a population of 60 million, has recorded more than 2.9 million COVID-19 cases including more than 89,000 deaths.

To date, the delta variant remains by far the most infectious and has crowded out other once-worrying variants including alpha, beta and mu. According to sequences submitted by countries worldwide to the world's biggest public database, more than 99% are delta.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 26, 2021, 01:02:39 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 25, 2021, 01:10:20 PM
as Florestan has pointed out, today's mandates in Europe and North America are impossible to enforce in any meaningful way.

Actually, there is a way to enforce them at least in some degree: constant fear-mongering coupled with encouraging people to spy on their neighbours and report any and all breaches of mandate; presenting the latter as the civic duty of a responsible citizenry also helps. It's been tested elsewhere and worked. I'd say it could work fairly well in this case too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 26, 2021, 03:48:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on November 26, 2021, 01:02:39 AM
Actually, there is a way to enforce them at least in some degree: constant fear-mongering coupled with encouraging people to spy on their neighbours and report any and all breaches of mandate; presenting the latter as the civic duty of a responsible citizenry also helps. It's been tested elsewhere and worked. I'd say it could work fairly well in this case too.

Yes, I mentioned the possibility of enacting penalties and encouraging people to spy on their neighbours and said that would be "a bridge too far" for myself and for many Americans, I'm quite sure. But there is no sign that the government has any inclination to take that step, and indeed, something like that would almost certainly trigger swift legal challenges that would lead to its being found unconstitutional. As long as the "mandate" is treated as mere guidance and as authority for institutions like schools and businesses to enact mask policies I have no issue with it.

Of more immediate concern IMO is the OHSA mandate for universal vaccination in companies with more than 100 employees. There have been legal challenges there, but I've lost track of where they stand at the moment. I would have no problem with withholding federal funds from institutions that receive federal funding for failure to comply, but regulatory penalties for all companies does raise legitimate concerns about the precedent that something like this sets, other OHSA workplace health-based regulations notwithstanding.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 26, 2021, 04:56:10 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 26, 2021, 03:48:41 AMOf more immediate concern IMO is the OHSA mandate for universal vaccination in companies with more than 100 employees.


OSHA Halts Rule Mandating COVID Vaccines and Testing (https://www.natlawreview.com/article/challenged-osha-s-rule-mandating-covid-vaccinations-or-weekly-testing-employers)

QuoteAs result of the Fifth Circuit's stay order, OSHA, on November 15, issued a statement that it was suspending "activities related to the implementation and enforcement" of the Rule, but provided that OSHA "remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies..." and that it is pausing its activities "pending future developments in the litigation."  Therefore, as of today, OSHA's implementation and enforcement of the Rule is temporarily halted.

Perhaps a legal scholar on this forum can cite where in the Constitution the federal government possesses the enumerated power to issue such mandates.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 26, 2021, 06:25:38 AM
The initial, overall positive estimate here by several experts in DK is that for example mRNA-vaccines can be adjusted to the new variant quite easily, should it be necessary. But it might take some months to work this out, maybe from say 4 months or half a year, including testing and approval. Production capacity won't be a problem.

Here, vaccinating children aged 5-11 years was officially approved and recommended today, following EMA decisions earlier.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 26, 2021, 06:54:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 26, 2021, 06:25:38 AM
The initial, overall positive estimate here by several experts in DK is that for example mRNA-vaccines can be adjusted to the new variant quite easily, should it be necessary. But it might take some months to work this out, maybe from say 4 months or half a year, including testing and approval. Production capacity won't be a problem.

Here, vaccinating children aged 5-11 years was officially approved and recommended today, following EMA decisions earlier.

Pfizer say 100 days for initial samples of an adjusted vaccine, whatever that may mean. 100 days is 100 days too long.


https://twitter.com/andrew_croxford/status/1464251996630831109?s=20
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 26, 2021, 07:34:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 26, 2021, 06:25:38 AM
The initial, overall positive estimate here by several experts in DK is that for example mRNA-vaccines can be adjusted to the new variant quite easily, should it be necessary. But it might take some months to work this out, maybe from say 4 months or half a year, including testing and approval. Production capacity won't be a problem.

Here, vaccinating children aged 5-11 years was officially approved and recommended today, following EMA decisions earlier.



All good news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 27, 2021, 06:00:50 AM

New Covid variant: How worried should we be? (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59418127)

What I get from it is that there is a real possibility that we're in big trouble, but hopefully not...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on November 27, 2021, 06:42:46 AM
Quote from: Que on November 27, 2021, 06:00:50 AM
New Covid variant: How worried should we be? (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59418127)

What I get from it is that there is a real possibility that we're in big trouble, but hopefully not...


Now is the time to panic. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 06:58:49 AM
Meryl Kornfield, Lateshia Beachum and Adela Suliman Yesterday at 2:23 p.m. EST| Updated today at 10:01 a.m. EST:

Even if the variant limits the effectiveness of vaccines, it's unlikely to completely subvert the protections that vaccines provide, experts say.

"My expectation would be that the mutations in this variant are not going to ablate or completely escape that type of antibody neutralization" from vaccines or prior infection, Bloom [Jesse Bloom, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center who has conducted mutational scanning experiments for the B.1.1.529 variant] said.

"Regardless of whether or not this new variant ends up spreading, I would suggest that people do what they can to minimize their chances of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2," Bloom added, referring to the virus by its technical name. "There are certain obvious things you can do: Get vaccinated, get a booster vaccination, wear a mask."

Though the sample size is still small, Sanne said physicians have seen a higher rate of breakthrough infections among those previously vaccinated in South Africa. But he added that initial data indicates the vaccines are still proving effective, with the majority of hospitalizations being among those who hadn't gotten the shot.

"We have every indication that the vaccines are still effective in preventing severe disease and/or complications," he said. "The data, however, is small and early."

Meanwhile, vaccine-makers, which have done preliminary research using vaccines with formulas tailored for other variants, are working to understand how well their vaccines can counter omicron.

"In the event that [a] vaccine-escape variant emerges, Pfizer and BioNTech expect to be able to develop and produce a tailor-made vaccine against that variant in approximately 100 days, subject to regulatory approval," a Pfizer spokesperson said in a statement.

Given the spread of B.1.1.529 in South Africa, several experts have pointed to the critical need to vaccinate underserved countries to bolster the world's protection from future, more-evasive variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 27, 2021, 06:59:09 AM
Some reasons not to panic

1. We're getting lots of reports now from European countries about this variant being detected, but as far as I can see none so far have reported a case of anyone with serious symptoms. That bodes very well. Especially if it's true (as seems likely to me) that it has been circulating for weeks.

2. I read somewhere that in SA the serious omega cases are mostly either wholly are partially unvaccinated.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 27, 2021, 08:54:55 AM
There were also very few coronavirus cases in South Africa at the time B.1.1.529 began to predominate over Delta; and while its prevalence has increased massively in terms of a percentage of that very low threshold, it's still only a very tiny fraction of the previous surges in Delta, Beta and wild-type SCV2 that caused the majority of deaths and hospitalisations.

In fact I'm not actually aware of any severe or critical cases of COVID-19 resulting from this variant, and the initial data suggesting that it's more transmissible than Delta is a pretty good indication that it's also less deadly. There's an inverse relationship between the two in general (a deadlier virus is harder to transmit because it kills a greater percentage of its hosts) and natural selection, in general, tends to select for viral mutations that are less deadly and therefore more efficient at spreading among hosts, especially as viruses become endemic within a population. (It's estimated that ~72% of the population of South Africa has previously been infected with SCV2.) The virus's "goal", such as it is, is to pass on its genome; it doesn't care about you as a multicellular organism or know you exist, it just "wants" your cells to produce more of itself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 09:31:23 AM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 08:54:55 AM
There were also very few coronavirus cases in South Africa at the time B.1.1.529 began to predominate over Delta; and while its prevalence has increased massively in terms of a percentage of that very low threshold, it's still only a very tiny fraction of the previous surges in Delta, Beta and wild-type SCV2 that caused the majority of deaths and hospitalisations.

In fact I'm not actually aware of any severe or critical cases of COVID-19 resulting from this variant, and the initial data suggesting that it's more transmissible than Delta is a pretty good indication that it's also less deadly. There's an inverse relationship between the two in general (a deadlier virus is harder to transmit because it kills a greater percentage of its hosts) and natural selection, in general, tends to select for viral mutations that are less deadly and therefore more efficient at spreading among hosts, especially as viruses become endemic within a population. (It's estimated that ~72% of the population of South Africa has previously been infected with SCV2.) The virus's "goal", such as it is, is to pass on its genome; it doesn't care about you as a multicellular organism or know you exist, it just "wants" your cells to produce more of itself.

Good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 09:38:28 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 27, 2021, 06:58:49 AM
Meryl Kornfield, Lateshia Beachum and Adela Suliman Yesterday at 2:23 p.m. EST| Updated today at 10:01 a.m. EST:

Even if the variant limits the effectiveness of vaccines, it's unlikely to completely subvert the protections that vaccines provide, experts say.

Why, of course! No amount of empirical facts and scientific data will ever make the experts question one iota of the vaccine-only dogma. The experts are experts and everybody else who is not an expert should listen to the experts --- and anyone who is not an expert yet dare to not listen to the experts should either shut up or be silenced.

The protection works for the protected but the unprotected pose a danger to the protected and therefore the protected must be protected from the unprotected by forcing upon the unprotected the protection that doesn't protect the protected. Got it? Me neither.










Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 10:04:51 AM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 08:54:55 AM

There's an inverse relationship between the two in general (a deadlier virus is harder to transmit because it kills a greater percentage of its hosts) and natural selection, in general, tends to select for viral mutations that are less deadly and therefore more efficient at spreading among hosts, especially as viruses become endemic within a population.

     Last year I hypothesized that the virus would evolve towards less lethality for this reason. The best "strategy" for a virus is to make the host sick enough to cough and sneeze on others while not dying soon or at all. Indeed, most viruses don't make people sick at all. These are the ones everyone has and takes no notice of. Only a stupid virus kills hosts.

Quote from: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 09:38:28 AM
Why, of course! No amount of empirical facts and scientific data will ever make the experts question one iota of the vaccine-only dogma. The experts are experts and everybody else who is not an expert should listen to the experts --- and anyone who is not an expert yet dare to not listen to the experts should either shut up or be silenced.

The protection works for the protected but the unprotected pose a danger to the protected and therefore the protected must be protected from the unprotected by forcing upon the unprotected the protection that doesn't protect the protected. Got it? Me neither.












     You should have put the empty space first and quit while you were only slightly behind. There is no vaccine-only dogma anywhere. Recommendations that people get shots are as well founded as for other viruses. Of course one might argue on typically absolutist grounds that there is no such thing as public health and since Bog don't care whether people die or live, people shouldn't care about their own fate or that of their families, friends and neighbors either. Humans can never be any better than their most sadistic fantasies. How dare we try to survive the infinite wrath of your sky buddy! (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 27, 2021, 10:08:36 AM
Yes, vaccine effects have been pretty solid.

https://twitter.com/EU_Commission/status/1463119478099693571?s=20
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 10:10:53 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 10:04:51 AM
     Last year I hypothesized that the virus would evolve towards less lethality for this reason. The best "strategy" for a virus is to make the host sick enough to cough and sneeze on others while not dying soon or at all. Indeed, most viruses don't make people sick at all. These are the ones everyone has and takes no notice of. Only a stupid virus kills hosts.

     You should have put the empty space first and quit while you were only slightly behind. There is no vaccine-only dogma anywhere. Recommendations that people get shots are as well founded as for other viruses. Of course one might argue on typically absolutist grounds that there is no such thing as public health and since Bog don't care whether people die or live, people shouldn't care about their own fate or that of their families, friends and neighbors either. Humans can never be any better than their most sadistic fantasies. How dare we try to survive the infinite wrath of your sky buddy! (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)

Go ahead: ask him just where this alleged vaccine-only dogma is in force. The latest of Andrei's strawmen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 10:13:36 AM
Somebody buy Andrei another bottle.

The protection works for the protected but the unprotected pose a danger to the protected and therefore the protected must be protected from the unprotected by forcing upon the unprotected the protection that doesn't protect the protected. And as for the unprotected, everybody dies anyway!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 10:14:10 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 27, 2021, 10:10:53 AM
Go ahead: ask him just where this alleged vaccine-only dogma is in force. The latest of Andrei's strawmen.

Austria is to become the first European country to make vaccinations against Covid 19 mandatory, and will go into its fourth nationwide lockdown for at least 10 days from Monday, the chancellor, Alexander Schallenberg, has announced.

The government said it was preparing the legal groundwork for a general vaccine mandate to come into effect from 1 February, with exemptions for those unable to receive a jab on medical grounds.

The age from which people will be required to be vaccinated has not yet been determined, the government said.

Those refusing to be vaccinated are likely to face administrative fines, which can be converted into a prison sentence if the fine cannot be recovered.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/austria-plans-compulsory-covid-vaccination-for-all (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/19/austria-plans-compulsory-covid-vaccination-for-all)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 10:17:19 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 27, 2021, 10:08:36 AM
Yes, vaccine effects have been pretty solid:

https://twitter.com/EU_Commission/status/1463119478099693571?s=20

      It's as though questions of personal choice and public safety had never arisen at any time in the era of scientific public health measures. There has been no influenza, polio, measles and of course children have never ever been vaccinated as a requirement to attend school. Never happened! No issue was raised. Every time around the goldfish bowl is a new experience and nobody knows nothing, nobody learns anything.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 10:18:00 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 27, 2021, 10:13:36 AM
Somebody buy Andrei another bottle.

Oh yes, guys, please keep them coming. Cabernet Sauvignon, if you please.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 10:42:36 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 10:17:19 AM
children have never ever been vaccinated as a requirement to attend school. Never happened!

Indeed. Never happened in Romania. Never. Ever. Period. Not. Even. During. Communist. Regime. 1947-1989. Never. Ever. Period.

As of late. I've seen many journalists and intellectuals on Romanian TV channels asking "Are we smarter than the Western countries in our refusal to follow their way, lockdowns, Covid Pass and all? Why don't we just follow suit?" --- and my answer is "Yes, we are! We don't follow suit because we have been following suit for 50 years and it resulted in disaster."

Romania today is a much freer country than many in the EU, especially Western EU, with respect to freedom of movement, assembly, work and free speech --- and I pray God it will remain so.

Now, Karl, please pass me the bottle --- and here's to you!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 27, 2021, 10:44:47 AM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 08:54:55 AM
There were also very few coronavirus cases in South Africa at the time B.1.1.529 began to predominate over Delta; and while its prevalence has increased massively in terms of a percentage of that very low threshold, it's still only a very tiny fraction of the previous surges in Delta, Beta and wild-type SCV2 that caused the majority of deaths and hospitalisations.

In fact I'm not actually aware of any severe or critical cases of COVID-19 resulting from this variant, and the initial data suggesting that it's more transmissible than Delta is a pretty good indication that it's also less deadly. There's an inverse relationship between the two in general (a deadlier virus is harder to transmit because it kills a greater percentage of its hosts) and natural selection, in general, tends to select for viral mutations that are less deadly and therefore more efficient at spreading among hosts, especially as viruses become endemic within a population. (It's estimated that ~72% of the population of South Africa has previously been infected with SCV2.) The virus's "goal", such as it is, is to pass on its genome; it doesn't care about you as a multicellular organism or know you exist, it just "wants" your cells to produce more of itself.

Interesting. The first reports from South Africa, a doctor who's been treating 25 of these patients, are indeed that it has generally milder, but also different symptoms.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/south-african-doctor-raised-alarm-omicron-variant-says-symptoms/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 11:16:10 AM
In Romania, the first dose of the monovalent measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) was introduced in 1979 for children aged 9–11 months, and the second dose (MCV2) was implemented in 1994 for children 6–7 years of age. The replacement of the first dose by the trivalent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine occurred in 2004, with the recommended age of inoculation being 12–15 months. The second dose was scheduled as part of school-based vaccination programs, and was aimed at children aged 6–7 years. In 2015, the standard age for inoculation with the second dose of the MMR vaccine was lowered to 5 years of age and the vaccine's delivery was moved to health centers instead of schools.

After the introduction of the measles-containing vaccine in 1979, the dynamics of the disease changed, exhibiting a decreased annual incidence and longer inter-epidemic periods. As opposed to the pre-vaccine era, when the average yearly incidence (per 100,000 population) exceeded 500, the magnitude of this value was almost 10 times lower from 1980 to 1999.


     Link (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00098/fullL)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 27, 2021, 11:34:34 AM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 08:54:55 AM
There's an inverse relationship between the two in general (a deadlier virus is harder to transmit because it kills a greater percentage of its hosts) and natural selection, . . .

In the long term there is a tendency for the variants to be less lethal. However for all we know omicron may be more deadly than delta, and I don't see that you can say that it is less likely to be more deadly. But to some extent in the first world the issue is not how lethal the variant is, it is how well the variant can break through immunity already acquired - especially through vaccination. In less developed countries the situation is different of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 11:41:26 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 11:16:10 AM
In Romania, the first dose of the monovalent measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) was introduced in 1979 for children aged 9–11 months, and the second dose (MCV2) was implemented in 1994 for children 6–7 years of age. The replacement of the first dose by the trivalent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine occurred in 2004, with the recommended age of inoculation being 12–15 months. The second dose was scheduled as part of school-based vaccination programs, and was aimed at children aged 6–7 years. In 2015, the standard age for inoculation with the second dose of the MMR vaccine was lowered to 5 years of age and the vaccine's delivery was moved to health centers instead of schools.

After the introduction of the measles-containing vaccine in 1979, the dynamics of the disease changed, exhibiting a decreased annual incidence and longer inter-epidemic periods. As opposed to the pre-vaccine era, when the average yearly incidence (per 100,000 population) exceeded 500, the magnitude of this value was almost 10 times lower from 1980 to 1999.

The only word missing from the above is mandatory. Instead there is the word recommended. I can assure you that to the best of my knowledge no Romanian kid was ever expelled from school and no Romanian parent was fined or jailed for not being, or not allowing to be, vaccinated.

Be it as it may, let's play by your rules: please tell us what is the difference between the Romanian-made measles-containing vaccine in 1979 and the rMNA anti-Covid-19 vaccines in 2020?

Quote
     Link (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00098/fullL)

404 Not Found

The page you requested cannot be found.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 11:42:26 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 11:16:10 AM
In Romania, the first dose of the monovalent measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) was introduced in 1979 for children aged 9–11 months, and the second dose (MCV2) was implemented in 1994 for children 6–7 years of age. The replacement of the first dose by the trivalent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine occurred in 2004, with the recommended age of inoculation being 12–15 months. The second dose was scheduled as part of school-based vaccination programs, and was aimed at children aged 6–7 years. In 2015, the standard age for inoculation with the second dose of the MMR vaccine was lowered to 5 years of age and the vaccine's delivery was moved to health centers instead of schools.

After the introduction of the measles-containing vaccine in 1979, the dynamics of the disease changed, exhibiting a decreased annual incidence and longer inter-epidemic periods. As opposed to the pre-vaccine era, when the average yearly incidence (per 100,000 population) exceeded 500, the magnitude of this value was almost 10 times lower from 1980 to 1999.


     Link (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00098/fullL)

Gosh! Even in Romania!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 27, 2021, 12:09:08 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 27, 2021, 11:34:34 AM
In the long term there is a tendency for the variants to be less lethal. However for all we know omicron may be more deadly than delta, and I don't see that you can say that it is less likely to be more deadly. But to some extent in the first world the issue is not how lethal the variant is, it is how well the variant can break through immunity already acquired - especially through vaccination. In less developed countries the situation is different of course.
We have very limited data; just a handful of initial reports. It could easily turn out to be more deadly—and therefore more easily containable, like most of the variants after Delta (Lambda, Mu, etc) that were designated "variants of concern" because of a deadlier symptom profile but proved unable to spread quickly and thus never ended up displacing Delta.

Delta is arguably a worst-case scenario—a variant that's less deadly than the wild-type, but still deadly enough to kill twenty to thirty percent of hospitalised patients; three times more transmissible, such that its wider reach ended up causing many more deaths than the wild-type had; and more resistant to vaccines (specifically the T cell response). Every new variant since then has come up against diminishing returns: highly transmissible but mild enough that the immune system can eliminate it before it can reproduce and overtake Delta in genome prevalence, or deadly enough that it burns out rapidly against the combination of vaccinations and social distancing protocols and therefore isn't as transmissible as Delta. Eventually we'll likely get a variant that's, say, six times more transmissible than the wild-type (R0 of 12) while still being severe enough or sufficiently mutated to escape vaccines/the immune system, and that variant will be capable of outcompeting Delta over time, and if that variant still kills, say, ten percent of hospitalised patients it'll produce a new mass casualty wave equivalent to Delta. But hopefully by that time someone will have a workable model for predicting future SCV2 mutations and by the time the following major variant of concern emerges there will be annual covid shots tailored in advance to that season's likely mutations/avenues of immune escape, just as we have our flu shots now. This could take another two or three years, and I doubt Western countries will be the first to get there. (It would be trivially easy to tweak an mRNA vaccine into targeting a slightly different protein or whatever, but the Euro-American cash will dry up and Pfizer & Moderna will lose interest as a result. I suspect someone will leak the specifications to India or Vietnam or South Africa or Cuba or whatever, or some hotshot scientists in Bangkok will independently create their own mRNA vaccines, and they'll be the first to actually try it.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 27, 2021, 12:48:51 PM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 12:09:08 PM
We have very limited data; just a handful of initial reports. It could easily turn out to be more deadly—and therefore more easily containable, like most of the variants after Delta (Lambda, Mu, etc) that were designated "variants of concern" because of a deadlier symptom profile but proved unable to spread quickly and thus never ended up displacing Delta.

Delta is arguably a worst-case scenario—a variant that's less deadly than the wild-type, but still deadly enough to kill twenty to thirty percent of hospitalised patients; three times more transmissible, such that its wider reach ended up causing many more deaths than the wild-type had; and more resistant to vaccines (specifically the T cell response). Every new variant since then has come up against diminishing returns: highly transmissible but mild enough that the immune system can eliminate it before it can reproduce and overtake Delta in genome prevalence, or deadly enough that it burns out rapidly against the combination of vaccinations and social distancing protocols and therefore isn't as transmissible as Delta. Eventually we'll likely get a variant that's, say, six times more transmissible than the wild-type (R0 of 12) while still being severe enough or sufficiently mutated to escape vaccines/the immune system, and that variant will be capable of outcompeting Delta over time, and if that variant still kills, say, ten percent of hospitalised patients it'll produce a new mass casualty wave equivalent to Delta. But hopefully by that time someone will have a workable model for predicting future SCV2 mutations and by the time the following major variant of concern emerges there will be annual covid shots tailored in advance to that season's likely mutations/avenues of immune escape, just as we have our flu shots now. This could take another two or three years, and I doubt Western countries will be the first to get there. (It would be trivially easy to tweak an mRNA vaccine into targeting a slightly different protein or whatever, but the Euro-American cash will dry up and Pfizer & Moderna will lose interest as a result. I suspect someone will leak the specifications to India or Vietnam or South Africa or Cuba or whatever, or some hotshot scientists in Bangkok will independently create their own mRNA vaccines, and they'll be the first to actually try it.)

Most interesting, thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 27, 2021, 12:57:04 PM
Quote from: amw on November 27, 2021, 12:09:08 PM
We have very limited data; just a handful of initial reports. It could easily turn out to be more deadly—and therefore more easily containable, like most of the variants after Delta (Lambda, Mu, etc) that were designated "variants of concern" because of a deadlier symptom profile but proved unable to spread quickly and thus never ended up displacing Delta.

Delta is arguably a worst-case scenario—a variant that's less deadly than the wild-type, but still deadly enough to kill twenty to thirty percent of hospitalised patients; three times more transmissible, such that its wider reach ended up causing many more deaths than the wild-type had; and more resistant to vaccines (specifically the T cell response). Every new variant since then has come up against diminishing returns: highly transmissible but mild enough that the immune system can eliminate it before it can reproduce and overtake Delta in genome prevalence, or deadly enough that it burns out rapidly against the combination of vaccinations and social distancing protocols and therefore isn't as transmissible as Delta. Eventually we'll likely get a variant that's, say, six times more transmissible than the wild-type (R0 of 12) while still being severe enough or sufficiently mutated to escape vaccines/the immune system, and that variant will be capable of outcompeting Delta over time, and if that variant still kills, say, ten percent of hospitalised patients it'll produce a new mass casualty wave equivalent to Delta. But hopefully by that time someone will have a workable model for predicting future SCV2 mutations and by the time the following major variant of concern emerges there will be annual covid shots tailored in advance to that season's likely mutations/avenues of immune escape, just as we have our flu shots now. This could take another two or three years, and I doubt Western countries will be the first to get there. (It would be trivially easy to tweak an mRNA vaccine into targeting a slightly different protein or whatever, but the Euro-American cash will dry up and Pfizer & Moderna will lose interest as a result. I suspect someone will leak the specifications to India or Vietnam or South Africa or Cuba or whatever, or some hotshot scientists in Bangkok will independently create their own mRNA vaccines, and they'll be the first to actually try it.)

It's not just delta that it will have to displace here in the UK, it's the delta plus variant, which seems to be very transmissible. I don't know how widespread it is

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59009293
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 27, 2021, 07:50:25 PM
     Link (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00098/full)

Quote from: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 11:41:26 AM
The only word missing from the above is mandatory. Instead there is the word recommended. I can assure you that to the best of my knowledge no Romanian kid was ever expelled from school and no Romanian parent was fined or jailed for not being, or not allowing to be, vaccinated.



     Parents are not jailed. Children are not expelled. They can return to school as soon as it is safe for them and others.

Quote from: Florestan on November 27, 2021, 11:41:26 AM

Be it as it may, let's play by your rules: please tell us what is the difference between the Romanian-made measles-containing vaccine in 1979 and the rMNA anti-Covid-19 vaccines in 2020?


     I guess you put a Bog on one and Pazuzu (personal friend of mine) on the other one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 28, 2021, 02:12:13 AM
Quote from: Que on November 27, 2021, 06:00:50 AM
New Covid variant: How worried should we be? (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59418127)

What I get from it is that there is a real possibility that we're in big trouble, but hopefully not...

Still true today. Transmissibility is higher, so it's likely that this variant will replace the delta variant as the dominant variant.
Mutation level is higher than all previous variants, but it is unsure what the consequences are. It is unclear if existing vaccines will still be effective. Same on the health effects: this variant could be more dangerous - or more benign. We could get lucky...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 03:19:18 AM
Interesting that Holland is recommending work from home now, Que. There are people here who think the UK should have done the same -- as far as I know Holland is the only Western country to have made that move.

Expensive! Think of all those Christmas parties at work which won't happen. The hospitality industry really are getting it in the neck.

And the rest in Holland seems really strong -- partial closures of retail and entertainments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 28, 2021, 04:25:05 AM
I think working from home is a good measure: it limits contact at work and the use of public transport. But almost every Dutch household  has Internet access.

There seems to be a clear divide in society:
1. Those who think the current measures are - again - too little, too late (count me in)
2. The large majority that doesn't care anymore and want it just to be over.
3. Those who think enough is enough and are opposing any government measures.

The hesitancy in scaling up measures during this new wave are political - general covid "fatigue" - as well as financial - after generous support of businesses during the first waves, financial buffers have been depleted.

But the limits of capacity in health care have been reached, and the government's hand is forced.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 06:29:14 AM
Quote from: Que on November 28, 2021, 04:25:05 AM
, financial buffers have been depleted.


Maybe, this is something I'm not confident to discuss really. Do you know about MMT?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 28, 2021, 08:01:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 06:29:14 AM
Maybe, this is something I'm not confident to discuss really. Do you know about MMT?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory

     All MMT does is say "you know that thing you do whenever you do it, you can do it". We have a debt ceiling to kind of pretend we can't do that thing we do. If we could really run out of dollars, we just would.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 10:26:44 AM
Yes clearly the idea of a "financial buffer", like a suitcase under the bed stuffed with cash, which has been depleted, is a bit fishy. Governments  can always just print some. But governments seem to use it to limit the populations expectations of services from the state - health services, pensons etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on November 28, 2021, 11:53:03 AM
Quote from: Que on November 28, 2021, 04:25:05 AM
I think working from home is a good measure: it limits contact at work and the use of public transport. But almost every Dutch household  has Internet access.

From the data I've seen (via Govt web sites etc) the biggest area of transmissibility is in the home environment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on November 28, 2021, 12:03:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on November 28, 2021, 11:53:03 AM
From the data I've seen (via Govt web sites etc) the biggest area of transmissibility is in the home environment.

True, but how does it get into the home?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on November 28, 2021, 12:18:22 PM
Wake up sheeple!!

(https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yODEwNzA0Mi9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0MDg0ODUxNH0.KGwa3UkdVUcsESfJHZ0iHoLUZx21yrTym_eoxgy3kbg/img.png?width=586&quality=80)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 28, 2021, 12:50:14 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 28, 2021, 12:18:22 PM
Wake up sheeple!!

(https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yODEwNzA0Mi9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0MDg0ODUxNH0.KGwa3UkdVUcsESfJHZ0iHoLUZx21yrTym_eoxgy3kbg/img.png?width=586&quality=80)

Yes, there are people who lap that crap up ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 28, 2021, 05:55:55 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 10:26:44 AM
Yes clearly the idea of a "financial buffer", like a suitcase under the bed stuffed with cash, which has been depleted, is a bit fishy. Governments  can always just print some. But governments seem to use it to limit the populations expectations of services from the state - health services, pensons etc.

Yes, they can just print some... but what effect does that have on the economy? Others contend that putting more cash into the economy that is not backed up by real wealth just devalues the currency and leads to or worsens inflation.

There's a reason some say that MMT actually stands for "Magic Money Tree".

TANSTAAFL etc....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on November 28, 2021, 07:43:59 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on November 28, 2021, 12:18:22 PM
Wake up sheeple!!

(https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yODEwNzA0Mi9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0MDg0ODUxNH0.KGwa3UkdVUcsESfJHZ0iHoLUZx21yrTym_eoxgy3kbg/img.png?width=586&quality=80)
This looks like a parody of conspiracy theories, usually when they are mocked it's done with the whole numerical calculation joke.

I looked up this person's twitter and looks legit after a quick glance, though. Says they are INTJ. Probably explains it. (They are such calculated planners that if they were in positions of power, they would do this sort of crazy stuff, so that's why unreasonably assume everything is calculated and planned- but this is only the unrealistic/unhealthy type of INTJ, usually they are more reasonable). 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 08:42:15 PM
Quote from: Que on November 28, 2021, 12:03:01 PM
True, but how does it get into the home?

Schools
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 08:45:45 PM
Quote from: krummholz on November 28, 2021, 05:55:55 PM
Yes, they can just print some... but what effect does that have on the economy? Others contend that putting more cash into the economy that is not backed up by real wealth just devalues the currency and leads to or worsens inflation.


Yes, well now I'm out of my depth. But I note in passing that an argument that you often here from government in the UK "we can't do X, Y or Z because we haven't got enough money . . . " - as nonsense! The last one here was to do with social care - and motivated a tax increase to "pay for it." You only have to think a little about it to see how flawed this way of thinking is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 29, 2021, 05:31:52 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 28, 2021, 08:45:45 PM
Yes, well now I'm out of my depth. But I note in passing that an argument that you often here from government in the UK "we can't do X, Y or Z because we haven't got enough money . . . " - as nonsense! The last one here was to do with social care - and motivated a tax increase to "pay for it." You only have to think a little about it to see how flawed this way of thinking is.

I'm not sure I see what is flawed about it.

If our government were to institute a national health system that would be paid for with a tax increase, that would make sense and wouldn't give me the heebie-jeebies. It's when they come up with hyper-expensive plans (like Biden's BBB bill) and then claim it will be paid for by raising taxes only on the wealthy, that I get worried. Too many times the US has spent money it did not currently have, borrowing itself into massive debt and then borrowing to begin to pay off that debt. That is what seems flawed to me. And with MMT, the fear is that they will simply print more money to keep the national debt under control. I just do not see how this can be sustained indefinitely.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on November 29, 2021, 06:00:15 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 28, 2021, 05:55:55 PM
Yes, they can just print some... but what effect does that have on the economy? Others contend that putting more cash into the economy that is not backed up by real wealth just devalues the currency and leads to or worsens inflation.

There's a reason some say that MMT actually stands for "Magic Money Tree".

TANSTAAFL etc....

Money has no intrinsic value. Classical macroeconomic theory is built on no foundation, usually it assumes that economic agents (people) behave with rational self interest. They don't. They are swayed just as much by nonsensical beliefs. It is not like physics, where there are underlying conservation rules like energy conservation, momentum conservation, mass conservation, the entropy law, which provide a profound constraint on theories.

A country is rich because its people work efficiently and produce a lot of stuff. The distribution of money determines what they work on. If it has proven anything, the last 20 years prove that you can "print money" and produce no inflation. The only time that printing money has to produce inflation is if the economy is at peak capacity and giving people more money motivates them to buy more stuff than the economy can produce. It appears we have been nowhere near that point. The inflation we are experiencing seems to be due to reduction is capacity to produce and import due to pandemic problems, which we might hope will be temporary. The worst thing that can happen is when the government doesn't print enough money and potentially productive workers are sitting at home because no one has the cash to buy what those workers could produce. With workforce participation dropping, that seems to be where we are headed.

If you want a case study of what's wrong with our economy, a couple of generations ago the most successful tech company was IBM. They had a very rich CEO, but they also had an army of salesmen in starched white shirts and blue three piece suites selling mainframes and earning commissions that put them in the upper middle class. They also had factories full of well paid manufacturing workers. Now we have Apple. It has a few company officials who possess the wealth of Croesus, but 95% of their employees are sales staff in Apple stores that made $35k a year and no commission, even though each apple store representatives sells several million dollars worth of stuff, on average. Larry Ellison of Oracle has a yacht that is bigger than a Navy destroyer. If more of Oracle's earnings went to its engineers, people would be employed building lots and lots of small pleasure boats, instead of Larry Ellison's mega-yacht.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 06:45:40 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 28, 2021, 05:55:55 PM
Yes, they can just print some... but what effect does that have on the economy? Others contend that putting more cash into the economy that is not backed up by real wealth just devalues the currency and leads to or worsens inflation.

There's a reason some say that MMT actually stands for "Magic Money Tree".

TANSTAAFL etc....

     If one thinks the effect on the economy is the important thing, then why keep fussing about fictional nominal limits? Why not instead focus on the effects of currency issuance on, say, the real economy? At a low issuance rate the economy will always move in a deflationary direction, which must be countered by spending the economy up in the direction of full employment/output. As I said, MMT says what we do, we can do. It would be naughty indeed if it said anything else.

     Since Covid the economy has been bolstered by a large increase of national savings to ward off the depression that would have otherwise resulted. How does fear of the Big Number factor in? Is it the fact that the savings are recorded as national debt? Will the economy collapse when we run out of zeros?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on November 29, 2021, 07:39:14 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 06:45:40 AM
     If one thinks the effect on the economy is the important thing, then why keep fussing about fictional nominal limits? Why not instead focus on the effects of currency issuance on, say, the real economy? At a low issuance rate the economy will always move in a deflationary direction, which must be countered by spending the economy up in the direction of full employment/output. As I said, MMT says what we do, we can do. It would be naughty indeed if it said anything else.

     Since Covid the economy has been bolstered by a large increase of national savings to ward off the depression that would have otherwise resulted. How does fear of the Big Number factor in? Is it the fact that the savings are recorded as national debt? Will the economy collapse when we run out of zeros?

You sound like you must be an economist and I confess I'm not. But from where I sit, that sentence of yours that I bolded looks positively Orwellian. To my understanding, what has bolstered the economy recently has been mainly the tremendous influx of cash from the Government in the form of stimulus payments and economic relief, e.g. the American Rescue Plan. I am at a loss to understand how that massive government spending can be classified as "savings".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 08:55:49 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 29, 2021, 07:39:14 AM
To my understanding, what has bolstered the economy recently has been mainly the tremendous influx of cash from the Government in the form of stimulus payments and economic relief, e.g. the American Rescue Plan. I am at a loss to understand how that massive government spending can be classified as "savings".

      Yes, you are at a loss. But consider that if the savings was fictional, so would be the debt on the other side. Either the savings held by the public is real or it isn't. Do you own Treasuries? Are they real? Mine are.

      Stephanie Kelton (peace and blessing be totally on her) once asked a bunch of economic sophistos if they would push a button to eliminate the national debt. To the surprise of absolutely no one, most of them (hereinafter known as "fools") said yes. She then closed the trap by asking if they would push a button to eliminate all the US Treasury securities. Of course it's the same button.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 09:31:58 AM
     I know this is a bit off topic (heh!) but it looks like Omicron doesn't very much kill people. It's the virus version of "hyperinflation". (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/tongue.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on November 29, 2021, 09:43:18 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 09:31:58 AM
     I know this is a bit off topic (heh!) but it looks like Omicron doesn't very much kill people. It's the virus version of "hyperinflation". (http://www.good-music-guide.com/community/Smileys/classic/tongue.gif)

This is a premature conclusion. The known number of infected persons has been small, and we don't now how the virus behaves in relation to the elderly and the vulnerable people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 11:04:05 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on November 29, 2021, 09:43:18 AM
This is a premature conclusion. The known number of infected persons has been small, and we don't now how the virus behaves in relation to the elderly and the vulnerable people.

     OK, I predict, not conclude, it will not kill as many people per infection as previous versions. So far we know the symptom are not as severe.

Hundreds of infected people across Southern Africa reportedly complain of nausea, headaches, fatigue and a high pulse rate, but none seem to suffer from a loss of taste or smell, which has been the case with most other Covid mutations.

Moreover, more and more medics across Southern Africa are confirming that most Omicron-infected patients merely have a severe headache, nausea or dizziness.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/coronavirus-blessing-in-the-sky-omicron-may-be-very-positive-news-for-the-world-if-new-covid-mutation-kills-off-more-lethal-delta-variant/)

     The Omicron market crash has largely reversed in a single trading day. The chickens have put their heads back on. Oh OK, never mind.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 29, 2021, 11:22:06 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 11:04:05 AM
     OK, I predict, not conclude, it will not kill as many people per infection as previous versions. So far we know the symptom are not as severe.

Hundreds of infected people across Southern Africa reportedly complain of nausea, headaches, fatigue and a high pulse rate, but none seem to suffer from a loss of taste or smell, which has been the case with most other Covid mutations.

Moreover, more and more medics across Southern Africa are confirming that most Omicron-infected patients merely have a severe headache, nausea or dizziness.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/coronavirus-blessing-in-the-sky-omicron-may-be-very-positive-news-for-the-world-if-new-covid-mutation-kills-off-more-lethal-delta-variant/)

     The Omicron market crash has largely reversed in a single trading day. The chickens have put their heads back on. Oh OK, never mind.

That's why it's called market volatility ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 29, 2021, 11:36:32 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 11:04:05 AM
     OK, I predict, not conclude, it will not kill as many people per infection as previous versions. So far we know the symptom are not as severe.

Hundreds of infected people across Southern Africa reportedly complain of nausea, headaches, fatigue and a high pulse rate, but none seem to suffer from a loss of taste or smell, which has been the case with most other Covid mutations.

Moreover, more and more medics across Southern Africa are confirming that most Omicron-infected patients merely have a severe headache, nausea or dizziness.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/coronavirus-blessing-in-the-sky-omicron-may-be-very-positive-news-for-the-world-if-new-covid-mutation-kills-off-more-lethal-delta-variant/)

     The Omicron market crash has largely reversed in a single trading day. The chickens have put their heads back on. Oh OK, never mind.

Hate the idea of a severe headache, hopefully I'm too old for it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 29, 2021, 12:09:32 PM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 11:04:05 AM
     OK, I predict, not conclude, it will not kill as many people per infection as previous versions. So far we know the symptom are not as severe.

Hundreds of infected people across Southern Africa reportedly complain of nausea, headaches, fatigue and a high pulse rate, but none seem to suffer from a loss of taste or smell, which has been the case with most other Covid mutations.

Moreover, more and more medics across Southern Africa are confirming that most Omicron-infected patients merely have a severe headache, nausea or dizziness.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/coronavirus-blessing-in-the-sky-omicron-may-be-very-positive-news-for-the-world-if-new-covid-mutation-kills-off-more-lethal-delta-variant/)

     The Omicron market crash has largely reversed in a single trading day. The chickens have put their heads back on. Oh OK, never mind.
Population health data takes a while to aggregate (& ideally you'd also have mouse models, etc.) so I wouldn't draw any conclusions. That said, within three weeks of the identification of wild-type SCV2 there was already evidence for a relatively high rate of death and severe illness simply based on clinical outcomes at hospitals in Wuhan, three weeks being the average time from infection to death. As such we should know more regarding the raw morbidity of Omicron-type SCV2 within the next two weeks or so. A lower morbidity would be consistent with past studies of coronavirus and influenza evolution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on November 29, 2021, 12:13:42 PM
For another take:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-11-29/omicron-is-feeding-the-republican-conspiracy-beast

:laugh: :laugh:

U.S. Representative Ronny Jackson, a Texas Republican and former White House physician, took to Twitter on Sunday to claim: "Here comes the MEV — the Midterm Election Variant! They NEED a reason to push unsolicited nationwide mail-in ballots. Democrats will do anything to CHEAT during an election — but we're not going to let them!"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on November 29, 2021, 12:24:39 PM
Quote from: T. D. on November 29, 2021, 12:13:42 PM
For another take:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-11-29/omicron-is-feeding-the-republican-conspiracy-beast

:laugh: :laugh:

U.S. Representative Ronny Jackson, a Texas Republican and former White House physician, took to Twitter on Sunday to claim: "Here comes the MEV — the Midterm Election Variant! They NEED a reason to push unsolicited nationwide mail-in ballots. Democrats will do anything to CHEAT during an election — but we're not going to let them!"
My initial thoughts/words would not be printable here.   >:(

And a former WH physician?!  Is he still licensed?  "God help us!" is my second thought.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 07:37:19 AM
Quote from: amw on November 29, 2021, 12:09:32 PM
Population health data takes a while to aggregate (& ideally you'd also have mouse models, etc.) so I wouldn't draw any conclusions. That said, within three weeks of the identification of wild-type SCV2 there was already evidence for a relatively high rate of death and severe illness simply based on clinical outcomes at hospitals in Wuhan, three weeks being the average time from infection to death. As such we should know more regarding the raw morbidity of Omicron-type SCV2 within the next two weeks or so. A lower morbidity would be consistent with past studies of coronavirus and influenza evolution.

     I don't think the virus will do a 180 in the next couple of weeks. Severe illness and deaths were not lagging indicators in Wuhan, they came before anything was known about the cause. In S. Africa we have mild symptoms, no hospitalizations and no deaths due to Omicron.

The WHO and Coronavirus experts are increasingly convinced the new Omicron variant is 'super mild' and has, so far, not led to a jump in Covid death rates anywhere in Southern Africa.

The WHO is calling this morning for countries to drop travel restrictions and end the mass hysteria, and instead be cautiously optimistic as more and more reports out of South Africa suggest the new Omicron variant is not more lethal than the previous Delta variant.

In fact, there have been no reports of hospitalisations or deaths as a result of anyone being diagnosed with Omicron.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/covid-death-rate-not-rising-swap-travel-restrictions-and-mass-hysteria-for-cautious-optimism-as-omicron-mutation-is-super-mild-variant-who-and-coronavirus-experts-say/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 07:39:39 AM
Thanks for the interesting - and quite positive, it seems - update.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 07:48:12 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 07:37:19 AM
     I don't think the virus will do a 180 in the next couple of weeks. Severe illness and deaths were not lagging indicators in Wuhan, they came before anything was known about the cause. In S. Africa we have mild symptoms, no hospitalizations and no deaths due to Omicron.

The WHO and Coronavirus experts are increasingly convinced the new Omicron variant is 'super mild' and has, so far, not led to a jump in Covid death rates anywhere in Southern Africa.

The WHO is calling this morning for countries to drop travel restrictions and end the mass hysteria, and instead be cautiously optimistic as more and more reports out of South Africa suggest the new Omicron variant is not more lethal than the previous Delta variant.

In fact, there have been no reports of hospitalisations or deaths as a result of anyone being diagnosed with Omicron.


     Link (https://www.cityam.com/covid-death-rate-not-rising-swap-travel-restrictions-and-mass-hysteria-for-cautious-optimism-as-omicron-mutation-is-super-mild-variant-who-and-coronavirus-experts-say/)

Can someone find me a link to support this claim?


QuoteThe WHO is calling this morning for countries to drop travel restrictions and end the mass hysteria, and instead be cautiously optimistic as more and more reports out of South Africa suggest the new Omicron variant is not more lethal than the previous Delta variant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 08:00:53 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 07:48:12 AM
Can someone find me a link to support this claim?

It's all in the provided link there, though the WHO source requesting 'optimism' isn't given; the other quotes have sources.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 08:25:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 08:00:53 AM
It's all in the provided link there, though the WHO source requesting 'optimism' isn't given; the other quotes have sources.

The WHO one seems to me the one most in need of support. I would be very surprised if it were true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 08:46:56 AM
If WHO has indeed also called for 'optimism', based on some facts, it will certainly be of interest too, but I agree that there's no concrete evidence for a WHO statement like that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 08:49:00 AM
If it's a lie then it's a serious thing, and that journal is a shameful rag which should be ignored from now on. If it were my site I would ban all references to it, for fear of promulgating misinformation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 09:02:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 08:49:00 AM
If it's a lie then it's a serious thing, and that journal is a shameful rag which should be ignored from now on. If it were my site I would ban all references to it, for fear of promulgating misinformation.

I'd take it a bit more easy in this case. Detailed sources are given for the other news there, and it's fairly easy to identify the single miss as regards the basis for using the exact word 'optimism'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 09:13:35 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 08:49:00 AM
If it's a lie then it's a serious thing, and that journal is a shameful rag which should be ignored from now on. If it were my site I would ban all references to it, for fear of promulgating misinformation.

     The source of information on the severity of Omicron is S. African GPs who have reported up the chain to health officials there. The WHO gets what it knows from them.

     Here's how I look at it. There hasn't yet been a single claim of a hospitalization or death from an Omicron infection. One would expect these cases to begin to show up before the cause was known, and the true cause subsequently identified. Instead we have the discovery of Omicron and only mild cases attributed to it. Supposedly it's spreading among the young and that might explain the mildness of symptoms. I do not buy this. That would explain few severe cases, but doesn't explain none at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 09:34:40 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 09:13:35 AM
     The source of information on the severity of Omicron is S. African GPs who have reported up the chain to health officials there. The WHO gets what it knows from them.

     Here's how I look at it. There hasn't yet been a single claim of a hospitalization or death from an Omicron infection. One would expect these cases to begin to show up before the cause was known, and the true cause subsequently identified. Instead we have the discovery of Omicron and only mild cases attributed to it. Supposedly it's spreading among the young and that might explain the mildness of symptoms. I do not buy this. That would explain few severe cases, but doesn't explain none at all.

I can see where you're coming from, but it is very early days with this. It looks to me as though the WHO citation was just a big fat lie. Even if it turns out to be true that the variant is less likely to cause serious illness and death, countries may still want to impose more restrictions than before because it's more infectious -- you'd have to model how many hospitalisations there are expected to be, and the available hospital resources. Don't forget in the North we're about to enter flu season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 07:37:19 AM
     I don't think the virus will do a 180 in the next couple of weeks.
Me neither. I prefer to be cautious and not draw any conclusions, but I don't see any evidence that the increasing restrictions and travel bans in response to the variant are justified.

Quote
Severe illness and deaths were not lagging indicators in Wuhan, they came before anything was known about the cause.
Well, yes, but once the cause was identified as a novel coronavirus and the first assays were designed, three weeks was the average time from positive PCR test to death or recovery. In this case, the new variant was sequenced and assays designed about a week ago, perhaps a bit longer. Therefore it might be another two weeks before we have % recovered/% died numbers. (The average for all existing variants of the virus has been 98/2; closer to 96/4 before the emergence of the Delta variant.)

Quote
In S. Africa we have mild symptoms, no hospitalizations and no deaths due to Omicron.
There are related hospitalisations in other countries; however, all that I know of are precautionary and intended to facilitate observation and information gathering about the new variant, with most hospitalised patients having mild to no symptoms.

The most concerning symptoms with this variant are cardiac, with some of Coetzee's patients presenting with elevated or irregular heart rates. Given the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis/other inflammatory heart failures associated with SCV2 antibodies, any new variant needs to be monitored for increased risk. All we have at the moment are anecdotal data (we'd need someone to systematically check ECGs of Omicron patients vs. a control population) but those individual reports are one main reason not to be too optimistic about the current situation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 30, 2021, 11:18:22 AM
I have a first cousin, her husband, daughter and son-in-law (a Greek-origin stomatologist) living in Johannesburg,  South Africa. They are all doubly vaccinated. My cousin's granddaughter was tested Covid positive two days ago and she stays at home with mild symptoms, after coming home  from a Madrid vacation. They told me today just today that we shouldn't believe one iota of what apocalyptical  news we hear --- South Africa proper is on Level 1 Alert (meaning masks and social distancing only);l she and her husband are going tomorrow on a 10-day vacation in Cape Town without any  problem at all; according to official SA news, not a single one of the omicron cases are in hospital, let alone ICU units.











Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 30, 2021, 11:22:45 AM
Quote from: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM
Me neither. I prefer to be cautious and not draw any conclusions, but I don't see any evidence that the increasing restrictions and travel bans in response to the variant are justified.
Well, yes, but once the cause was identified as a novel coronavirus and the first assays were designed, three weeks was the average time from positive PCR test to death or recovery. In this case, the new variant was sequenced and assays designed about a week ago, perhaps a bit longer. Therefore it might be another two weeks before we have % recovered/% died numbers. (The average for all existing variants of the virus has been 98/2; closer to 96/4 before the emergence of the Delta variant.)
There are related hospitalisations in other countries; however, all that I know of are precautionary and intended to facilitate observation and information gathering about the new variant, with most hospitalised patients having mild to no symptoms.

The most concerning symptoms with this variant are cardiac, with some of Coetzee's patients presenting with elevated or irregular heart rates. Given the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis/other inflammatory heart failures associated with SCV2 antibodies, any new variant needs to be monitored for increased risk. All we have at the moment are anecdotal data (we'd need someone to systematically check ECGs of Omicron patients vs. a control population) but those individual reports are one main reason not to be too optimistic about the current situation.

Neither panic, nor irrational optimism. I'm in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on November 30, 2021, 11:24:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 09:34:40 AM
It looks to me as though the WHO citation was just a big fat lie.

Do you -- or any other rational, fact-checking human being --- still believe what the WHO says?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 11:31:04 AM
Quote from: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM
Me neither. I prefer to be cautious and not draw any conclusions, but I don't see any evidence that the increasing restrictions and travel bans in response to the variant are justified.
Well, yes, but once the cause was identified as a novel coronavirus and the first assays were designed, three weeks was the average time from positive PCR test to death or recovery. In this case, the new variant was sequenced and assays designed about a week ago, perhaps a bit longer. Therefore it might be another two weeks before we have % recovered/% died numbers. (The average for all existing variants of the virus has been 98/2; closer to 96/4 before the emergence of the Delta variant.)
There are related hospitalisations in other countries; however, all that I know of are precautionary and intended to facilitate observation and information gathering about the new variant, with most hospitalised patients having mild to no symptoms.

The most concerning symptoms with this variant are cardiac, with some of Coetzee's patients presenting with elevated or irregular heart rates. Given the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis/other inflammatory heart failures associated with SCV2 antibodies, any new variant needs to be monitored for increased risk. All we have at the moment are anecdotal data (we'd need someone to systematically check ECGs of Omicron patients vs. a control population) but those individual reports are one main reason not to be too optimistic about the current situation.

     Your caution is justified IMV. I'm on the Moderna bus times 3, and they are expressing some concern that their vaccine may be less effective against the new strain. Like a savvy Fed chairman I will monitor events closely while I do nothing.

     What I think will happen is that it won't be long before Covid vaccination will be about as frequent as that for influenza, and we'll have several thousand deaths and many more severe illnesses on a permanent basis. Omicron is pretty much the kind of development one might expect to happen from viral evolution.

Quote from: Florestan on November 30, 2021, 11:24:23 AM
Do you -- or any other rational, fact-checking human being --- still believe what the WHO says?



     I'm not beliefy about stuff. I can parse what institutions say without falling into the abyss of credulity or naivety. If you can't do that you're gonna need a bigger whateveritis.

     On Earth we follow the news and take notes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 30, 2021, 11:57:50 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 30, 2021, 11:31:04 AM
     I'm not beliefy about stuff. I can parse what institutions say without falling into the abyss of credulity or naivety. If you can't do that you're gonna need a bigger whateveritis.

     On Earth we follow the news and take notes.

How utterly rational, Ernie.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on November 30, 2021, 12:06:04 PM
Meanwhile, for the emotional vaccine-deniers:

Vermont reports record COVID-19 hospitalizations — 3:37 p.m.

By The Associated Press

Vermont on Tuesday reported its highest number of hospitalizations from COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic.

A total of 84 people were hospitalized, with 22 in intensive care, according to the Vermont Department of Health.

Unvaccinated people made up 71% of the hospitalizations and 81% of critical care stays over the last seven days, according to state data. During his weekly virus briefing Tuesday, Governor Phil Scott urged Vermonters to get vaccinated and get their boosters.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on November 30, 2021, 12:20:44 PM
If what the WHO is saying has a basis in fact then it's not surprising. Viruses mutate to try and ensure their highest rate of survival. Killing their host is the last thing it wants to have happen as it slows down transmission. Ebola is a classic case of a virus that died out because it killed the  majority of it's hosts before they had a chance to pass it on.

There is strong evidence that the H1N1 flu virus (the Spanish Flu) did something similar about a century ago. After initially killing a great number of people it mutated to a state where only those with compromised health were likely to die if they caught it (and H1N1 is still with us today). The major mutation process took about three years (1918 - 21) and even though there was no vaccine until the 1930s the mortality rate plummeted.

So whether the WHO is blatantly lying or not, based on historical evidence of other pandemics, I believe there is cause for optimism and that's been echoed by many in the medical world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 01:07:58 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 30, 2021, 11:24:23 AM
Do you -- or any other rational, fact-checking human being --- still believe what the WHO says?
]

I don't think WHO is lying. I think that the paper is lying!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 01:11:02 PM
Quote from: Florestan on November 30, 2021, 11:18:22 AM
according to official SA news, not a single one of the omicron cases are in hospital

Are you sure?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 11:04:20 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on November 30, 2021, 01:11:02 PM
Are you sure?

There are now conflicting news coming from South Africa, including hospitalizations. Apparently, the identifying of the Omicron cases isn't yet in place, and it's still early.

- positive: https://apnews.com/fe004c1e59fa5cd73fbc41a9efe86f99
- negative & critique of the above: https://www.news.com.au/world/africa/south-african-epicentre-of-the-omicron-variant-shows-increase-in-hospitalisations/news-story/f792bc26fb95d0a7f3a0d0d421ea11e6

As laymen, I think we'll just have to wait and see for the oncoming tendencies, and the general press to then collect the facts, probably within a couple of weeks the picture will be clearer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 01:43:48 AM
Quote from: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM

The most concerning symptoms with this variant are cardiac, with some of Coetzee's patients presenting with elevated or irregular heart rates. Given the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis/other inflammatory heart failures associated with SCV2 antibodies, any new variant needs to be monitored for increased risk. All we have at the moment are anecdotal data (we'd need someone to systematically check ECGs of Omicron patients vs. a control population) but those individual reports are one main reason not to be too optimistic about the current situation.

This is an interesting line of thought, I've tried to find out whether it is indeed a serious preoccupation of the medics involved but so far I've come up with nothing. As far as I can see there are very few cases with heart events (one maybe.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 01:47:36 AM
Quote from: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM
Me neither. I prefer to be cautious and not draw any conclusions, but I don't see any evidence that the increasing restrictions and travel bans in response to the variant are justified.

This was my reaction first of all, but I'm now not sure it's correct. If it turns out to be a serious problem governments will have to be ready to put things into place to manage it - test and trace systems, for example, and services for the very vulnerable. These things have probably been put into a sleep mode over summer - so buying a bit of time before it kicks off big time, even if it's just a week or two, is maybe not a bad idea.

And I'd add, time to increase the vaccine acquired immunity of the population a little.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 01:51:13 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on November 30, 2021, 11:04:20 PM
There are now conflicting news coming from South Africa, including hospitalizations. Apparently, the identifying of the Omicron cases isn't yet in place, and it's still early.

- positive: https://apnews.com/fe004c1e59fa5cd73fbc41a9efe86f99
- negative & critique of the above: https://www.news.com.au/world/africa/south-african-epicentre-of-the-omicron-variant-shows-increase-in-hospitalisations/news-story/f792bc26fb95d0a7f3a0d0d421ea11e6

As laymen, I think we'll just have to wait and see for the oncoming tendencies, and the general press to then collect the facts, probably within a couple of weeks the picture will be clearer.

Are Tshwane and Gauteng different areas?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 01:57:29 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 01:51:13 AM
Are Tshwane and Gauteng different areas?

I don't know, but it would be easy to find out ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on December 01, 2021, 01:59:15 AM
Tshwaneemunicipality is in Gauteng province..
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 01, 2021, 07:54:33 AM
Quote from: drogulus on November 29, 2021, 08:55:49 AM
      Yes, you are at a loss. But consider that if the savings was fictional, so would be the debt on the other side. Either the savings held by the public is real or it isn't. Do you own Treasuries? Are they real? Mine are.

No, that makes sense. But you didn't qualify your statement by saying "savings held in the form of securities held by the public", so it appeared you were talking about savings by the USG. And to answer your question, yes, I hold such securities (T-Bills), and am very well aware that they represent a piece of the national debt. That doesn't make the debt any less real, or less potentially dangerous to the economy if managed by simply printing money.

Thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 01, 2021, 08:02:17 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 30, 2021, 12:06:04 PM
Meanwhile, for the emotional vaccine-deniers:

Vermont reports record COVID-19 hospitalizations — 3:37 p.m.

By The Associated Press

Vermont on Tuesday reported its highest number of hospitalizations from COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic.

A total of 84 people were hospitalized, with 22 in intensive care, according to the Vermont Department of Health.

Unvaccinated people made up 71% of the hospitalizations and 81% of critical care stays over the last seven days, according to state data. During his weekly virus briefing Tuesday, Governor Phil Scott urged Vermonters to get vaccinated and get their boosters.

Ya beat me to it, Karl... Yes, and UVM's critical care unit is working on appropriating more critical care beds to handle the influx.

The spike in Vermont has been going on for several weeks now. There is some speculation that this is partly a consequence of Vermont's low case rate in prior months (i.e., less natural immunity in the population, coupled with waning vaccine immunity).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on December 01, 2021, 08:15:11 AM
Quote from: amw on November 30, 2021, 09:58:00 AM
Me neither. I prefer to be cautious and not draw any conclusions, but I don't see any evidence that the increasing restrictions and travel bans in response to the variant are justified.

The problem as I see it isn't that travel bans might be unjustified, it's that they're likely pointless. Recent history has shown that by the time a strain is identified it has already spread beyond recall. Four continents already, right?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 08:30:31 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on December 01, 2021, 08:15:11 AM
The problem as I see it isn't that travel bans might be unjustified, it's that they're likely pointless. Recent history has shown that by the time a strain is identified it has already spread beyond recall. Four continents already, right?

The point of the travel bans is not to stop it or or recall it, it's to slow it down a little.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 08:31:36 AM
The strategy isn't to stop the virus, but to delay, so that as many people as possible can benefit from vaccines, the 3rd jab, or scientific research.

Here it's just been announced that the vaccination resources will be doubled, so that 500,000 can be vaccinated each week, or around 9 % of the population.

Omicron was in Nigeria already in October, so Botswana or South Africa probably isn't the origin of it
https://www.npr.org/2021/12/01/1060423949/nigeria-omicron-variant-origins
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 01, 2021, 08:45:37 AM
Quote from: BasilValentine on December 01, 2021, 08:15:11 AM
The problem as I see it isn't that travel bans might be unjustified, it's that they're likely pointless.
If this were a different thread, I would argue that the real purpose of travel bans and limitations, or vaccine passports that only recognise certain vaccines as valid, or, e.g., the Australian government's forced quarantines of indigenous communities, etc., is not epidemiological at all but rather stems from desires by particular (invariably white-majority for some reason) countries to control or prevent the free movement of "undesirable" populations, with COVID-19 used as an increasingly flimsy pretext. But this is officially an apolitical thread, so I won't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 08:51:52 AM
Quote from: amw on December 01, 2021, 08:45:37 AM
desires by particular (invariably white-majority for some reason) countries to control or prevent the free movement of "undesirable" populations,

That's certainly the point of Brexit. Keep out of Britain the mass migrations into Europe caused by Global Warming.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 08:58:01 AM
Quote from: amw on December 01, 2021, 08:45:37 AM
If this were a different thread, I would argue that the real purpose of travel bans and limitations, or vaccine passports that only recognise certain vaccines as valid, or, e.g., the Australian government's forced quarantines of indigenous communities, etc., is not epidemiological at all but rather stems from desires by particular (invariably white-majority for some reason) countries to control or prevent the free movement of "undesirable" populations, with COVID-19 used as an increasingly flimsy pretext. But this is officially an apolitical thread, so I won't.

I think you're forgetting some details, in order to paint a possible, future, broad picture. The US banned the 26 European Schengen countries + the UK for 20 months, until mid-November, for example. Australia banned all travellers without special permission for 18 months, and New Zealand is still closed, after an even longer period. And you have the vaccine and infection rates as a factor, not necessarily racism.

A German study however recommended quarantines instead of bans, since bans tend to be too delayed:
https://www.bbc.com/news/59461861
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 09:00:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 08:31:36 AM
The strategy isn't to stop the virus, but to delay, so that as many people as possible can benefit from vaccines, the 3rd jab, or scientific research.

Here it's just been announced that the vaccination resources will be doubled, so that 500,000 can be vaccinated each week, or around 9 % of the population.

Omicron was in Nigeria already in October, so Botswana or South Africa probably isn't the origin of it
https://www.npr.org/2021/12/01/1060423949/nigeria-omicron-variant-origins


The article doesn't seem to say where the person with omicron in Nigeria in October came from.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 09:01:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 01, 2021, 09:00:09 AM

The article doesn't seem to say where the person with omicron in Nigeria in October came from.

That is correct.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 01, 2021, 09:08:48 AM
Covid is set to cost the tourism industry $1.6 trillion this year. Omicron could make it worse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 01, 2021, 09:10:55 AM
Danielle Paquette: South Korea announced its first five cases of omicron on Wednesday — all with links to Nigeria — and earlier this week, Canada reported that its first two cases of the variant were detected in people returning from a trip to the West African nation. A case in Hong Kong was also in someone who had traveled to Nigeria.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 01, 2021, 09:14:01 AM
Well, now a Nigerian official casts a lot of doubts about the earlier information, it was Delta in October, not Omicron, it's said. The truth will probably be established.

https://globalnews.ca/news/8415906/omicron-covid-19-variant-nigeria-october/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 01, 2021, 09:19:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 01, 2021, 09:08:48 AM
Covid is set to cost the tourism industry $1.6 trillion this year. Omicron could make it worse.
Not surprised to hear that.  Earlier today read yet another article about the hospitality industry struggling to stay afloat with yet more cancellations:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59463592

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 01, 2021, 06:50:50 PM

     Moderna exec says company could have Omicron booster ready in March (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moderna-exec-says-company-could-195151583.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 02, 2021, 12:49:26 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 01, 2021, 06:50:50 PM
     Moderna exec says company could have Omicron booster ready in March (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moderna-exec-says-company-could-195151583.html)

What does " ready to file for U.S. authorization" mean? Does it mean that they'll have sufficient test data by then to say to the relevant bodies "We're ready to roll it out to the general public?"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 02, 2021, 01:12:35 AM
I have dropped out of the thread for a bit so apologise if already raised, but shocked at mooted serious discussion in the EU of compulsory vaccinations. I listened in on a radio talk-show last night. If heard correctly, also unvaccinated over 60's in Greece are fined 100 euros each month they remain so!   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 02, 2021, 01:34:38 AM
That is correct, also if you check with any real media, there's been such proposals and discussions. All Danish parties are against it. The Greece info is true and it's a lot of money especially for the elderly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 02, 2021, 02:20:37 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 02, 2021, 01:12:35 AM
I have dropped out of the thread for a bit so apologise if already raised, but shocked at mooted serious discussion in the EU of compulsory vaccinations. I listened in on a radio talk-show last night. If heard correctly, also unvaccinated over 60's in Greece are fined 100 euros each month they remain so!   
Wow!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 02, 2021, 03:30:33 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 02, 2021, 01:12:35 AM
I have dropped out of the thread for a bit so apologise if already raised, but shocked at mooted serious discussion in the EU of compulsory vaccinations. I listened in on a radio talk-show last night. If heard correctly, also unvaccinated over 60's in Greece are fined 100 euros each month they remain so!   

Fear is being used to widen the Overton window.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2021, 10:43:52 AM
So, Rand Paul was bullshitting. Surprised? I ain't.

Rand Paul's false claim that masks don't work

By Salvador Rizzo, Reporter
Today at 3:00 a.m. EST

"When you talk about the peer-reviewed studies of masks, there was one done in Denmark, showed that it didn't work. When you look at all of Sweden — 1.8 million children have not been wearing masks for the last two years, they've had zero covid deaths. And you say, 'Well, have the teachers been infected?' Well, it turns out the teachers are infected at the same rate as the rest of the public. So, they've had no masks for a year, year and a half. And it has worked. And that's a whole country."

— Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), in an interview on Fox News, Nov. 29, 2021

When Paul talks about "the peer-reviewed studies of masks," he is referring to only one study, from Denmark, and he's twisting what it says.

In reality, multiple peer-reviewed studies show that wearing face coverings mitigates the spread of the coronavirus.

That's especially true for recently infected people who don masks when they go outside the home. They may not be showing symptoms, but they are carrying a high viral load. The face covering works as a stopper, capturing many infectious airborne particles before they can reach another person.

Although Sweden has seen a very low rate of child mortality from covid-19, Paul's statement that no Swedish children have died of the disease also is inaccurate.

The Facts

From April to June 2020, researchers tracked 6,024 participants for a study in Denmark, which did not recommend mask-wearing in public at the time. Cafes and restaurants were closed during most of this period; public health authorities were recommending quarantine for those with the coronavirus, as well as social distancing and limiting face-to-face encounters.

The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine last year, found that the group wearing surgical masks was less likely to catch the virus than the unmasked group, but there was not enough evidence to reach a statistically significant conclusion.

"Our results suggest that the recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mask wearers in a setting where social distancing and other public health measures were in effect, mask recommendations were not among those measures, and community use of masks was uncommon," the researchers wrote. "Yet, the findings were inconclusive and cannot definitively exclude a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection of mask wearers in such a setting. It is important to emphasize that this trial did not address the effects of masks as source control or as protection in settings where social distancing and other public health measures are not in effect."

Paul claimed on Fox News that this study showed that masks don't work, but in fact the study says masks could reduce coronavirus cases by up to 46 percent in circumstances like Denmark's — or increase infections by up to 23 percent. A spokeswoman for the senator referred us to the Danish study but did not respond to our questions.[She wouldn't, would she?—kh]

"Measures to impede transmission in health care and community settings are essential," the same study adds. "The virus is transmitted person-to-person, primarily through the mouth, nose, or eyes via respiratory droplets, aerosols, or fomites. ... Face masks are a plausible means to reduce transmission of respiratory viruses by minimizing the risk that respiratory droplets will reach wearers' nasal or oral mucosa." (Somehow this passage did not make it into Paul's summary of the study.)

Other studies have found that mask-wearing in the community reduces the incidence of covid-19. Paul didn't mention them on Fox News.

"During the pandemic, the scientific evidence has increased," according to a study this year in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). "Compelling data now demonstrate that community mask-wearing is an effective nonpharmacologic intervention to reduce the spread of this infection, especially as source control to prevent spread from infected persons, but also as protection to reduce wearers' exposure to infection."

In the British Medical Journal last month, a review of six scientific studies found a 53 percent reduction in covid-19 incidence from mask-wearing. It added that the "results of additional studies that assessed mask-wearing (not included in the meta-analysis because of substantial differences in the assessed outcomes) indicate a reduction in covid-19 incidence, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality. Specifically, a natural experiment across 200 countries showed 45.7% fewer covid-19 related mortality in countries where mask-wearing was mandatory."

Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in January found "evidence in favor of widespread mask use as source control to reduce community transmission."

"Nonmedical masks use materials that obstruct particles of the necessary size; people are most infectious in the initial period postinfection, where it is common to have few or no symptoms; nonmedical masks have been effective in reducing transmission of respiratory viruses; and places and time periods where mask usage is required or widespread have shown substantially lower community transmission," the survey says.

The lead author, Jeremy Howard, said the Danish research Paul was referring to "showed that low-quality masks such as cloth masks do not have a very large protective effect to the wearer."

"This was expected — respiratory particles quickly evaporate and become too small for a cloth mask to stop," Howard said. "However, cloth masks are protective for those around an infected wearer." Some research, he added, shows "it is far better to use higher-quality masks, or alternatively add a mask fitter."

The first large, randomized trial to test mask efficacy in a real-world setting recently was completed in Bangladesh, where nearly 350,000 people in rural parts of the country were tracked. The study has not completed the peer-review process, but the authors report that "when surgical masks were employed, 1 in 3 symptomatic infections were avoided for individuals 60+ years old, the age group that faces the highest risk of death following infection."

The results for cloth masks were less conclusive. A separate study sent to us by Paul spokeswoman Kelsey Cooper — from 2015, before the coronavirus pandemic — found that cloth masks should not be recommended for health-care workers, particularly in high-risk situations, because "moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection." The findings do not apply to surgical masks or high-quality masks.[emphasis mine—kh]

The same researchers posted an update after the coronavirus pandemic began: "Health workers are asking us if they should wear no mask at all if cloth masks are the only option. Our research does not condone health workers working unprotected. We recommend that health workers should not work during the COVID-19 pandemic without respiratory protection as a matter of work health and safety. ... If health workers choose to work using cloth masks, we suggest that they have at least two and cycle them, so that each one can be washed and dried after daily use."

How does a mask stop coronavirus particles?

Imagine an infected person who is breathing, talking, singing, exercising, coughing or sneezing in a crowded room. Several studies have found that face masks are able to capture the airborne infectious particles that can spread the coronavirus. That's what scientists refer to as "source control," and that's why public health authorities recommend masks in some indoor settings along with vaccinations, social distancing and other measures.

"There is laboratory-based evidence that household masks have filtration capacity in the relevant particle size range, as well as efficacy in blocking aerosols and droplets from the wearer," the PNAS study says. "That is, these masks help people keep their emissions to themselves. A consideration is that face masks with valves do not capture respiratory particles as efficiently, bypassing the filtration mechanism, and therefore offer less source control."

As the JAMA study says: "Exposure is greater the closer a person is to the source of exhalations. Larger droplets fall out of the air rapidly, but small droplets and the dried particles formed from them (ie, droplet nuclei) can remain suspended in the air. In circumstances with poor ventilation, typically indoor enclosed spaces where an infected person is present for an extended period, the concentrations of these small droplets and particles can build sufficiently to transmit infection."

This study found that community masking reduces coronavirus transmission rates in two ways — first, by blocking the virus-laden droplets being exhaled (source control) and second, by protecting uninfected wearers, although masks were found to be less effective for this group.

"Masks form a barrier to large respiratory droplets that could land on exposed mucous membranes of the eye, nose, and mouth," the study says. "Masks can also partially filter out small droplets and particles from inhaled air. Multiple layers of fabric and fabrics with higher thread counts improve filtration. However, the observed effectiveness of cloth masks to protect the wearer is lower than their effectiveness for source control, and the filtration capacity of cloth masks can be highly dependent on design, fit, and materials used."

'1.8 million children ... zero covid deaths'

Paul also brought up Sweden in this interview, arguing that the country, which had no mask requirement for schools, did not see worse coronavirus transmission or mortality rates. He said zero children had died of covid-19, but the official Swedish figures show that 14 people ages 0-19 had died of the disease as of the most recent update.

A study published in August in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health found that Norway, a neighbor to Sweden that imposed stricter coronavirus lockdown measures, had lower mortality rates. "The COVID-19-associated mortality rates per 100,000 person-weeks during the first wave of the pandemic were 0.3 in Norway and 2.9 in Sweden," it says.

"All-cause mortality in Norway was lower during the pandemic, whereas the all-cause mortality among elderly people in Sweden increased substantially," the researchers found. "In previous years, both countries have seen a decreasing trend in all-cause mortality. It remains to be seen whether the observed excess deaths in Sweden during the pandemic may, in part, be explained by mortality displacement and whether the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation measures are associated with other harms or benefits."

Paul's spokeswoman said he was referring to a letter published by a Swedish researcher in February in the New England Journal of Medicine. "Despite Sweden's having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic," it says, adding that from March to June 2020, "no child with Covid-19 died."

That's a few months, not the year or year and a half Paul mentioned.[emphasis mine—kh] The letter, now outdated, was peer-reviewed by some academics and criticized by others, who said it ignored school outbreaks of covid-19, among other issues.

The Pinocchio Test

Paul said the scientific research on wearing masks shows they don't mitigate the spread of the coronavirus. But the only study he relies on for support was inconclusive at best.

In fact, most of the peer-reviewed research shows that wearing masks outside the home, especially surgical or high-quality masks, reduces the incidence of covid-19 cases.

The senator's misleading talk of "peer-reviewed studies" goes far beyond the usual spin and merits Four Pinocchios.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2021, 10:54:45 AM
No good: Coronavirus cases in South Africa nearly triple in three days as fears over omicron grow
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2021, 11:54:54 AM
'I don't think we're back to square one.' Beth Israel races to find out how much vaccines protect against Omicron

The hospital's researchers are part of a global effort to understand the fast-spreading variant.

By Jonathan Saltzman Globe Staff, Updated December 2, 2021, 27 minutes ago

Dr. Dan Barouch's Thanksgiving morning began with an e-mail that made him shudder.

The message had been sent the night before by a computational biologist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. She alerted the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center immunologist and more than a dozen other US scientists to some worrisome new coronavirus variants she was tracking, especially a highly mutated strain first detected in the African nations of Botswana and South Africa.

"I'm so sorry to send you [news of] horrible variants just before a holiday," wrote Bette Korber, who studies the evolutionary changes of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. "But it seemed important to get the word out, as these are so very different. The potential of these scare (sic) me."

Barouch runs Beth Israel's Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, which helped create the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and has studied rival shots from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. Korber' e-mail was the starting gun for a race by his lab and dozens of others around the world to assess the threat posed by what is now known as Omicron.

Barouch understood her alarm when he looked at the genetic sequence of the variant. It had 32 mutations on the spike protein, which the virus uses to invade human cells. Many were in an area that antibodies latch onto when attacking the virus. That immediately raised concerns that the mutations could diminish the effectiveness of the vaccines.

"It really felt like we have to be on this right away," he remembered thinking that day as he sat at his computer at home in Newton. "Here we go again."

Although it was a holiday, lab employees hastily began trying to determine whether the three COVID vaccines cleared for use in the US will protect recipients from the variant. Roughly a third of Barouch's 60 researchers are designing experiments and starting to synthesize Omicron's spike protein so they can test it on blood samples taken from people who have received vaccines and boosters.

Researchers in the US and abroad are doing similar work. Others are trying to determine whether the variant is more contagious than the now-dominant Delta strain or causes more severe illness. Unfortunately, in an era when people expect to find answers on the Internet within seconds, researchers say it will likely take at least a couple of weeks to get clarity about Omicron.

That's particularly frustrating given how fast viruses can spread. Hours after Barouch spoke with a reporter Wednesday, the first case of Omicron in the US was confirmed in a vaccinated traveler who returned to California after a trip to South Africa. The person, who had received two doses of the Moderna shot, but had not been vaccinated long enough to receive a booster, is improving and agreed to remain in quarantine, California officials said. A second case of the Omicron variant was identified in the US on Thursday, detected in a Minnesota man who was fully vaccinated and had received a booster shot and had traveled to New York City for a convention attended by tens of thousands of people.

Although executives from Pfizer's German partner BioNTech and from Cambridge-based Moderna have publicly expressed hopes that their firms' vaccines will continue to provide at least some protection against Omicron, Barouch says no one can say anything with certainty until the evidence is in.

"If I were to speculate, I don't think we're back to square one," he said in his 10th-floor office overlooking the Longwood Medical Area. He suspects that the antibodies and immune cells stimulated by vaccines for the coronavirus that emerged in China in late 2019 will still provide some protection, or "cross-reactive immunity," to Omicron. How much, he said, "is not clear."

Last Thursday, Barouch and his wife, Dr. Fina Barouch ― an ophthalmologist and former classmate at Harvard Medical School ― and their two school-age daughters were preparing for a Thanksgiving feast featuring a 24-pound turkey when he read the e-mail from Korber. She tracks hundreds of genetic sequences of variants around the world that are entered into a public online database called GISAID. Most variants on the database don't pose a serious threat. But the one that Korber flagged had several troubling features.

The variant, which had been sequenced by South African health officials after it was detected in coronavirus samples at a private lab in that country, had a startling number of mutations, at least 50. Of those, 32 were on the spike protein.

Barouch showed a reporter the genetic sequence of the Omicron spike protein on his computer screen, which displayed line after line of letters. Most were black, but 32 were red, blue, purple, or yellow. Each colored letter represented a mutation. In contrast, he said, the genetic sequence of the Delta variant would have had only a handful of colored letters, illustrating the profound evolutionary changes in Omicron.

"We haven't seen this number of mutations before," he said.

Several other things were troubling. Twelve of the mutations on the spike protein were in the so-called receptor-binding domain, the target of disease-fighting antibodies stimulated by the vaccine or an infection. Scientists recognized several of the mutations from other variants and knew they have the ability to evade antibodies. The combination of features, Barouch said, is "the reason why it caused such a global panic."

Beginning Friday at 5 a.m., after a delayed Thanksgiving dinner with his family, Barouch began exchanging a torrent of e-mails with top executives of J&J's pharmaceutical division, Janssen, in the US and the Netherlands. They asked whether he thought J&J's coronavirus vaccine ― which accounts for less than 4 percent of the more than 461 million COVID vaccine doses administered in the US ― would protect recipients against the new variant. He said he didn't know, but his lab would start to run experiments on that and the two other vaccines.

Scientists at Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna are running the same types of tests. All of the makers of the three vaccines have said that they are prepared to roll out booster shots to target Omicron, if necessary. But it could be months before companies would be able to get them in people's arms if the firms have to develop shots tailor-made to the variant, test them on volunteers, and get them cleared by regulators.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use messenger RNA to instruct cells to create a harmless protein similar to the spike protein on the surface of the coronavirus and stimulate an immune response. The J&J vaccine does the same thing by using a virus that causes colds to deliver part of the spike proteins into cells.

Barouch also exchanged e-mails with hundreds of scientists at the World Health Organization, the National Institutes of Health, the Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness and universities around the world.

Researchers at his lab also scrambled on the holiday weekend in response to the news.

Katherine McMahan, a research assistant, was driving back to Boston from Pittsburgh on Thanksgiving when she began exchanging texts with Catherine Jacob-Dolan, a PhD student in the lab who was visiting her parents in Arlington.

"Are you working on this?" McMahan recalled asking. "What do you know?"

Jacob-Dolan was indeed working on it and had begun ordering reagents from suppliers. Reagants are used in the lab for chemical reactions in experiments.

John Ventura, a post-doctoral fellow at the lab, said he was at the Boston Museum of Science on Friday, looking at the full-size Tyrannosaurus rex model with his 5-year-old son, Teddy, when he saw an e-mail about Omicron. He quickly brought his son home so he could head to the lab.

"He said, 'Daddy, why do we have to leave the museum?'" Ventura recalled. "I said, 'Well, I have to go be with the viruses.'"

Although everyone wants to know whether existing vaccines protect against Omicron, Barouch said that even when researchers across the globe begin to report initial results of studies, it will take time to confirm the findings.

"In the next days to weeks, data will just pour out from hundreds of labs around the world," he said. "Even when the first pieces of data come out, they're not definitive until they've been reproduced by many people."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 02, 2021, 12:21:23 PM
Even in Mass. the unvaccinated remain "a significant minority."

'Not good at all': Spike in Massachusetts COVID-19 infections show pandemic isn't over, experts say

By Sahar Fatima and Felice J. Freyer Globe Staff, Updated December 2, 2021, 11:18 a.m.

Massachusetts reported the highest number of COVID-19 infections and hospitalization rates in months on Wednesday, and specialists say it's a grim reminder that the pandemic is far from over.

"It's a reminder that COVID is far from gone," said Dr. Paul Edward Sax, clinical director of the infectious disease clinic at Brigham and Women's Hospital. "People who are unvaccinated [a significant minority] and people with underlying immune deficits remain at significant risk."

He said some of the positive cases involve unvaccinated children, who have a much lower immunization rate than adults.

"We've been watching the case numbers and the hospitalizations closely, and this very closely parallels what we saw last year," Sax said.

The Thanksgiving holiday likely contributed to the increase, Dr. David Hamer, a Boston University professor of global health and medicine, said Wednesday. "We saw this last year ... After each holiday there was an increase in cases."

On Wednesday, the seven-day proportion of COVID tests that returned positive was 5.14 percent, a level not seen since last January.

"This is not good at all," said William Hanage, associate professor of epidemiology and codirector of the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. "The positivity rate should be driven down by Thanksgiving testing, because low-risk people are getting tests to fly."

He said the increase in cases, amplified by the holiday, may not be overly worrying given Massachusetts' high vaccination rates. As of Wednesday, 70.7 percent of the population was fully vaccinated.

"However, the potential for transmission of Omicron should be a concern," Hanage said. On Wednesday, the United States reported its first case of the new strain of the virus in a California resident who had traveled back from South Africa on Nov. 22. Another case was announced in Minnesota on Thursday in a vaccinated man who had recently traveled to New York City for an anime convention.

Scientists around the world are racing to understand whether the mutated version of the coronavirus is more dangerous and spreads more quickly.

Reactions to Massachusetts' high numbers on Wednesday poured in online.

Some people said they'd seen anecdotal evidence of a spike in cases in their own social circle.

Before the state released the latest numbers, the city of Chelsea instated an indoor mask mandate on Wednesday. The order goes into effect on Friday and will apply to all public spaces within private businesses as well as inside public buildings.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 03, 2021, 04:46:08 AM
Sadly, I'm not surprised to see a rise in a number of cases in the US post-Thanksgiving.

I just ran across this article on the BBC's website which was heartbreaking to read.  Due to a lack of volunteers at a pharmacy, about 1,000 people had to be turned away from receiving their shots.  This was in ONE day:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-59510206

Not certain if they were all booster shots or a mixture.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 03, 2021, 01:20:51 PM
Most coronavirus vaccines work as boosters, with higher antibody levels from Pfizer and Moderna, study finds
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 03, 2021, 04:26:47 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-03/contractor-shot-mandate-under-assault-in-texas-georgia-hearings

President Joe Biden's power to mandate Covid-19 vaccinations for federal contractors was under attack in two federal courtrooms Friday, with a pair of judges appointed by the Trump administration considering whether to up the tally of states where the measure is blocked.

Attorneys for Texas and a seven-state coalition led by Georgia told the judges that Biden overstepped his authority with an intrusive policy for contractors that's actually just cover for his real agenda of getting Americans vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 03, 2021, 05:21:34 PM
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/kids-under-two-now-10-per-cent-of-hospital-admissions-in-south-africas-omicron-ground-zero/news-story/5f00e1102fd7bf676bbf96acffc4c68c (https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/kids-under-two-now-10-per-cent-of-hospital-admissions-in-south-africas-omicron-ground-zero/news-story/5f00e1102fd7bf676bbf96acffc4c68c)

There hasn't yet been a COVID-19 variant where children appear to be at significant risk. There is now. Even if this is a milder variant with lower death/serious illness rates, that's still cause for caution, especially given that no vaccines have yet been approved for young children.

Scientific data are obviously needed for a more accurate risk assessment, and I haven't seen any yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 03, 2021, 05:23:08 PM
Does make the adult assholes look yet more like assholes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 04, 2021, 04:16:40 AM
An interesting article about Ivermectin and Covid:

« The Ivermectin Train Cannot Stop - As the evidence for ivermectin helping with COVID-19 crumbles, prominent promoters double down. Why?« 


https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19/ivermectin-train-cannot-stop (https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19/ivermectin-train-cannot-stop)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 04, 2021, 08:16:04 AM
Quote from: krummholz on November 29, 2021, 07:39:14 AMYou sound like you must be an economist and I confess I'm not.


drogulus is most certainly not an economist. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 04, 2021, 08:19:59 AM
Local happenings:

Oregon begins drafting new indoor mask rules (https://www.kgw.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/oha-drafting-new-indoor-mask-rules/283-4092d773-8a1d-4800-96de-bc96b208701e)

QuoteThe current indoor mask mandate is a temporary rule and is set to expire in February, so Oregon health leaders wants to be able to switch to a permanent rule before then. The permanent rule can still be ended once the COVID-19 pandemic recedes to a safe level, but it can remain in place indefinitely in the meantime and won't expire prematurely while case numbers are still dangerously high.

Permanent rules that can last indefinitely and for which no metrics exist that the public can use to assess government action.  The very definition of authoritarianism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 04, 2021, 08:44:49 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 04, 2021, 08:19:59 AM
Local happenings:

Oregon begins drafting new indoor mask rules (https://www.kgw.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/oha-drafting-new-indoor-mask-rules/283-4092d773-8a1d-4800-96de-bc96b208701e)

Permanent rules that can last indefinitely and for which no metrics exist that the public can use to assess government action.  The very definition of authoritarianism.

Do the public presume to know better than the experts and the government what's best for their own good? Shame on them --- they should listen to, and trust in, science. Science knows. Science can. Science will.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 08:46:59 AM
Omicron possibly more infectious because it shares genetic code with common cold coronavirus, study says

The study is in preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 04, 2021, 08:47:24 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 04, 2021, 08:19:59 AM
Local happenings:

Oregon begins drafting new indoor mask rules (https://www.kgw.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/oha-drafting-new-indoor-mask-rules/283-4092d773-8a1d-4800-96de-bc96b208701e)

Permanent rules that can last indefinitely and for which no metrics exist that the public can use to assess government action.  The very definition of authoritarianism.

The mask is a public sign of righteousness.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 08:51:10 AM
What if "reaching the unvaccinated" is about like "explaining to a Trumpkin that the election was not stolen?"

We don't need universal booster shots. We need to reach the unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 04, 2021, 09:22:01 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 04, 2021, 08:51:10 AM
What if "reaching the unvaccinated" is about like "explaining to a Trumpkin that the election was not stolen?"

I think it is exactly like that. A week ago I learned that a dear friend, a retired nurse, and her spouse are dead set against getting the jab because of misinformation about the frequency of adverse reactions. They take Ivermectin instead. It soon became clear that her main source of information was videos by such luminaries as Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. John Campbell. We've been having a back-and-forth "battle of links" on the subject, but I can tell that she will not be swayed by reason.

Sadly, on the internet one can always find support for ANY idea one chooses to believe in, no matter how strong the evidence against it might be.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 09:31:59 AM
"a corporate Christmas party" ... people, in other words, who ought to have shown better sense:

Omicron cases related to Christmas party in Oslo, Norway, may grow to 100 — 11:20 a.m.
Bloomberg

Cases of the Omicron variant of Covid-19 in the Norwegian capital linked to a corporate Christmas party may rise to as many as 100, public broadcaster NRK reported.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 04, 2021, 09:35:59 AM
Some reports say they were vaccinated ... here in DK, corporate Christmas parties are now often being cancelled.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 04, 2021, 09:43:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 04, 2021, 09:35:59 AM
Some reports say they were vaccinated ...

Don't know about the Norwegians but the Dutch certainly were.

Reuters:

Dutch authorities: all 14 passengers from S.Africa flights with Omicron were vaccinated

By Reuters Staff

1 Min Read

AMSTERDAM, Dec 2 (Reuters) - All 14 passengers on Nov. 26 flights from South Africa to the Netherlands that were later found to have the Omicron coronavirus variant had been vaccinated, Dutch health authorities said on Thursday.

A spokesperson for the Netherlands Institute for Health (RIVM) confirmed the vaccination status of the 14 on the basis of an investigation by the regional health authority that oversees Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport. (Reporting by Toby Sterling Editing by Peter Graff)


https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 09:50:31 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 04, 2021, 09:35:59 AM
Some reports say they were vaccinated ... here in DK, corporate Christmas parties are now often being cancelled.

If so, a distressing demo of omicron breakthrough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 04, 2021, 10:15:13 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 04, 2021, 09:50:31 AM
If so, a distressing demo of omicron breakthrough.

Only of infections. Delta breaks through at the level of infections.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 04, 2021, 12:12:37 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 01, 2021, 09:19:57 AM
Not surprised to hear that.  Earlier today read yet another article about the hospitality industry struggling to stay afloat with yet more cancellations:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59463592

PD

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 04, 2021, 09:31:59 AM
"a corporate Christmas party" ... people, in other words, who ought to have shown better sense:

Omicron cases related to Christmas party in Oslo, Norway, may grow to 100 — 11:20 a.m.
Bloomberg

Cases of the Omicron variant of Covid-19 in the Norwegian capital linked to a corporate Christmas party may rise to as many as 100, public broadcaster NRK reported.
Quote from: Florestan on December 04, 2021, 09:43:22 AM
Don't know about the Norwegians but the Dutch certainly were.

Reuters:

Dutch authorities: all 14 passengers from S.Africa flights with Omicron were vaccinated

By Reuters Staff

1 Min Read

AMSTERDAM, Dec 2 (Reuters) - All 14 passengers on Nov. 26 flights from South Africa to the Netherlands that were later found to have the Omicron coronavirus variant had been vaccinated, Dutch health authorities said on Thursday.

A spokesperson for the Netherlands Institute for Health (RIVM) confirmed the vaccination status of the 14 on the basis of an investigation by the regional health authority that oversees Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport. (Reporting by Toby Sterling Editing by Peter Graff)


https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X)
Quote from: Florestan on December 04, 2021, 09:43:22 AM
Don't know about the Norwegians but the Dutch certainly were.

Reuters:

Dutch authorities: all 14 passengers from S.Africa flights with Omicron were vaccinated

By Reuters Staff

1 Min Read

AMSTERDAM, Dec 2 (Reuters) - All 14 passengers on Nov. 26 flights from South Africa to the Netherlands that were later found to have the Omicron coronavirus variant had been vaccinated, Dutch health authorities said on Thursday.

A spokesperson for the Netherlands Institute for Health (RIVM) confirmed the vaccination status of the 14 on the basis of an investigation by the regional health authority that oversees Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport. (Reporting by Toby Sterling Editing by Peter Graff)


https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-variant-dutch-flights/dutch-authorities-all-14-passengers-from-s-africa-flights-with-omicron-were-vaccinated-idUKS8N2LZ09X)

I had mentioned an article earlier about the effect on the hospitality industry.  At least part of the Christmas parties were corporate related and some involved catering.  :(  So, not everyone is going ahead with their plans.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 12:47:25 PM
Dang, and the Republican Senator from Ohio declared the pandemic over, too!

I'm grateful that my church choir are preparing to sing a Lessons and Carols, Christmas Eve. We're all vaccinated and boosted, singing masked and distanced. That is to say,none of us supposes that the fact that we're vaccinated means that we're somehow done with precaution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 02:58:19 PM
The virus is life-threatening, but everybody is going to die anyway.

j/k

Opinion: The virus is life-threatening, but the means of survival exist. Use them.

By WaPo Editorial Board
Today at 8:00 a.m. EST

The new coronavirus variant is a genuine cause for unease. Omicron appears to be highly transmissible, and it will most likely swamp the world in the months ahead. It is too early to know whether it will be more virulent than the delta variant or more evasive of vaccine immunity. But it is not too early to decide what to do about it. The tools to respond exist, if we will only be serious about wearing masks and getting vaccinated.

Even with the unknowns, vaccines work. [emphasis mine—kh ... feel the burn, Andrei?]They can protect against the delta variant raging everywhere. Boosters create a high level of immunity against delta and may help fend off omicron, too. The vaccines are a lifesaver to people who might otherwise die. Why hesitate to get vaccinated, refuse to wear a mask or deride mandates for both at this stage of the pandemic? Why is a quarter of the U.S. population without at least one vaccine dose — essentially driving at high speed without a seat belt? How many more of the unvaccinated will be hospitalized, intubated and die? Anyone in the United States who can easily get a free vaccine and refuses to do so is leaving themselves vulnerable to a killer disease that has already taken more lives than were lost in the line of duty during the Civil War.

Why should anyone become another victim?

Vaccines have already shown to be tremendously effective, bringing infection levels way down from last winter's surge. But delta is still tormenting the unvaccinated and, with the arrival of the holidays, appears to be surging anew. Ominous reports have been coming in recent weeks from Minnesota, Michigan, Colorado, Vermont, Nebraska and New Hampshire. New York state just reported the most new cases since January — 56 hospitals in the state had a bed capacity of 10 percent or less. Massachusetts reported its largest single-day case count since last winter's surge. Nirav Shah, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told the Associated Press, "Omicron is a spark that's on the horizon. Delta variant is the fire that's here today."

President Biden's latest pandemic strategy, promising to fight the pandemic with "science and speed," calls for more testing, better access to vaccines, tighter travel restrictions and other measures. These are all pointing in the right direction, but the ambition is modest. For example, Mr. Biden proposes that private health insurers reimburse people for rapid at-home tests, not just those obtained at a doctor's office or pharmacy. That might help, but at-home diagnostic tests are still not being manufactured rapidly enough so that the whole country can feel comfortable using them regularly and without cost.

Masks and other simple mitigation techniques are going to be vital again this winter. We know what to do to fight this war. Governments, businesses, schools and other institutions play a big role, but it is ultimately up to individuals to regard the virus for what it is: potentially life-threatening. The way to survive is at hand. Grab it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 03:10:11 PM
The most-vaccinated big counties in America are beating the worst of the coronavirus

By Aaron Blake
Senior reporter
Today at 7:00 a.m. EST

About 1 in 420 Americans has died of covid-19, according to official data. And we're still averaging more than 1,000 deaths per day.

But in certain areas — and indeed in many areas in which the population is much more tightly packed and the coronavirus could transmit more easily — the story is far less grim. A big reason: widespread vaccination. Death rates are far below the national average in the most-vaccinated, often-urban areas.

Much has been written about the yawning gap in outcomes between less-vaccinated and more-vaccinated areas, especially as deaths in less-vaccinated, red states significantly and increasingly outpace more-vaccinated, blue states. The Washington Post's Philip Bump also reported this week that deaths in red counties are more than 50 percent higher than in blue counties.

But even that might undersell just how beneficial vaccination is in preventing the worst that the coronavirus has to offer — particularly when adopted on a grand scale in a given area.

From the start of the vaccination effort, a pertinent question has been when we might achieve something amounting to "herd immunity," i.e. having enough people vaccinated to stomp out the virus. Guesstimates often pegged that number at 70 percent or above. That concept has proven elusive, particularly as the delta variant has rendered the vaccines less effective at preventing the spread — while still extremely effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths.

But those latter metrics remain hugely important. And in the densely populated areas in which we've approached overwhelming adoption of the vaccines, the death rates are often a fraction of the national average — a significantly greater gap than between the most-vaccinated and least-vaccinated states.

Perhaps the most highly vaccinated large county in America, according to New York Times data, is Montgomery County, Md., just outside the District of Columbia. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show 93 percent of those 12 and older there are fully vaccinated, compared to around 70 percent nationally. The number dying over the past week is eight times as high nationally — 3.4 per 1 million — as it is in Montgomery County — 0.4 per 1 million — even as Montgomery County is near some virus hotspots.

The relative rate is similar in two of the handful of other most-vaccinated large counties in the country: Dane County, Wis. (home to Madison), where 86 percent of people 12 and older are fully vaccinated, per the CDC, and San Francisco, where 84 percent are vaccinated. Dane County also has 0.4 deaths per 1 million despite being in one of the most hard-hit regions, the Midwest.

Slightly fewer people 12 and over are vaccinated in New York City, though still north of 80 percent. Over the past week, it has registered a per-capita death rate about one-third the national average.

Similar to New York City are Multnomah County, Ore. (home to Portland), with its 84 percent full vaccination rate; Alameda County, Calif. (home to Oakland) at 84 percent; and Santa Clara County, Calif. (home to San Jose) at 81 percent. In each case, there is about 1 death per 1 million people, compared to 3-per-1-million at the national level (as well as more than 3 deaths per million statewide in Oregon and more than 2 per million in California).

There are some larger, highly vaccinated counties with rates that are comparable to the national average. These come particularly in the Denver area — Denver itself (79 percent fully vaccinated, 3 deaths per 1 million) and Boulder County (79 percent vaccinated, 2 deaths per 1 million) — and in Minneapolis-based Hennepin County (78 percent vaccinated, 3 deaths per 1 million).

But they also come in slightly less-vaccinated counties than the above and in states that are significantly more hard-hit than the rest of the broader country right now. These counties' per capita death rates are also still about half or less compared to the rest of their states (more than 6 deaths per million in Colorado and 7 deaths per million in Minnesota).

So while the most-vaccinated states are significantly, incontrovertibly and increasingly better off than the less-vaccinated states, the difference is even starker at the county and city level — and even as many of these highly vaccinated counties also happen to be the most densely populated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 04, 2021, 03:16:17 PM
'Will you answer the call?' Pop-up vaccine clinic at Museum of Science draws crowds — 5:44 p.m.
By Charlie McKenna, Globe Correspondent

Lollipops and stickers were in abundance Saturday at the Museum of Science, which held its third vaccination clinic for children and adults.

The clinic was the third held by the museum in the past four weeks, according to Carrie Nash, the museum's director of public relations. And the museum will hold another one on Sunday.

Those who get vaccinated at the clinic will receive two free tickets to the museum, which recently debuted an exhibit chronicling the vaccine's development. The clinic, dubbed "will you answer the call?" encourages visitors to come dressed as superheroes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 05, 2021, 12:51:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 04, 2021, 02:58:19 PM
Even with the unknowns, vaccines work. [emphasis mine—kh ... feel the burn, Andrei?]

I'm screaming in pain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 05, 2021, 05:07:00 AM
Omikron numbers dramatically adjusted here Sunday in DK, to now 183 cases, when it was just 18 on Friday, making the country one of the most targeted places. But it's no doubt due to the massive testing and an effective mapping/surveying of tests/data, typically 2-4 % of the population per day with PCR tests. Most of the cases hadn't been involved in travelling recently. Expect similar trends elsewhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 05, 2021, 08:58:00 AM
Belgian police use water, tear gas on COVID-19 protesters (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/belgian-police-water-tear-gas-covid-19-protesters-81567986)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 05, 2021, 09:29:14 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 05, 2021, 08:58:00 AM
Belgian police use water, tear gas on COVID-19 protesters (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/belgian-police-water-tear-gas-covid-19-protesters-81567986)

More than 40,000 march in Vienna against coronavirus lockdown (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/thousands-march-vienna-against-coronavirus-lockdown-2021-12-04/)

Luxemburg: Covid-19 protestors clash with police at Christmas market  (https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1827992.html)

Hooligans are taking over Europe...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 05, 2021, 01:14:06 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFxe9ifXEAQmzn8?format=jpg&name=large)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 05, 2021, 01:28:34 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 05, 2021, 01:14:06 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFxe9ifXEAQmzn8?format=jpg&name=large)

Staggering idiocy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on December 05, 2021, 01:35:43 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 05, 2021, 01:14:06 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFxe9ifXEAQmzn8?format=jpg&name=large)

Apples and oranges. This woman is a first-class moron.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on December 05, 2021, 08:28:27 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 05, 2021, 01:14:06 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFxe9ifXEAQmzn8?format=jpg&name=large)

Imagine if you could reduce cancer deaths just by wearing a mask and social distancing.  And imagine if there was a vaccine you could get...

EDIT: forgot about HPV vaccine.  There is a vaccine you can get!  And it's another thing that gives radical conservatives conniptions...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 06, 2021, 06:56:18 AM
Quote from: amw on December 01, 2021, 08:45:37 AM
If this were a different thread, I would argue that the real purpose of travel bans and limitations, or vaccine passports that only recognise certain vaccines as valid, or, e.g., the Australian government's forced quarantines of indigenous communities, etc., is not epidemiological at all but rather stems from desires by particular (invariably white-majority for some reason) countries to control or prevent the free movement of "undesirable" populations, with COVID-19 used as an increasingly flimsy pretext. But this is officially an apolitical thread, so I won't.

Travel to Europe was banned for some time as well. I think the travel bans are a perfect example of what I once heard called "do something" politics - i.e. politicians doing something for no reason other than that it's good to be seen taking action. That, and they'll be raked over the coals if they don't do that, even if it's counterproductive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 06, 2021, 07:13:00 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 06, 2021, 06:56:18 AM
Travel to Europe was banned for some time as well. I think the travel bans are a perfect example of what I once heard called "do something" politics - i.e. politicians doing something for no reason other than that it's good to be seen taking action. That, and they'll be raked over the coals if they don't do that, even if it's counterproductive.

Kabuki theatre politics
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 06, 2021, 07:13:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 04, 2021, 08:47:24 AM
The mask is a public sign of righteousness.

It's more a sign of me wanting to go to the convenience store.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 06, 2021, 07:27:14 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 06, 2021, 07:13:57 AM
It's more a sign of me wanting to go to the convenience store.

Indeed, a sign of leaving the house on errands.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 06, 2021, 02:00:07 PM
https://www.economist.com/united-states/why-americas-omicron-response-is-weak/21806662

Concluding paragraph:

Nearly every attempt the Biden administration has made to mitigate the coronavirus has been undermined. "The US is virtually ungovernable," says Mr Gostin. Ms Parmet agrees, pointing to the rulings against vaccine mandates for health-care workers. For decades, she notes, the federal government has required much from health workers: to wear gloves, to get screened for tuberculosis and to take other steps to protect public health. With covid, the federal government has suddenly become hobbled. "The courts are adding to the ungovernability. I fear they have become players in the culture war," says Ms Parmet. "And to do that during a public-health crisis...It's bananas!" Mr Biden probably feels the same way.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 07, 2021, 01:38:54 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 06, 2021, 02:00:07 PM
https://www.economist.com/united-states/why-americas-omicron-response-is-weak/21806662

The Netherlands and Denmark demanded that all travellers from southern African countries isolate themselves for several days, then produce negative results from covid tests. Slovenia required that such travellers quarantine for ten days, test or no test.

America's response, by comparison, was muted. The Biden administration banned travel from eight southern African countries for everyone except citizens and legal residents—a measure that quickly proved as ineffectual as it was unfair, since the variant had already spread elsewhere in the world.



The highlighted statement is not supported by the facts presented in any way. Logically, since the variant had already spread elsewhere in the world, then the measures taken by The Netherlands, Denmark and Slovenia were equally ineffective and unfair --- unless one presumes that all omicron variants in the world headed for the USA.

Actually, of the mentioned countries it's only the USA that took exactly the one measure which can ensure, with some degree of accuracy, that omicron infected persons do not enter the USA territory, namely this:

The administration also said that from December 6th it would begin requiring international travellers older than one to test negative for covid-19 within 24 hours of departure

The rest of the article is under a pay wall but if its "quality" is similar to the above I have no regret not being able to read it in full.

I should have thought that The Economist does better journalism than that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 07, 2021, 01:55:20 AM
The border closures are total theatre. A useless gesture from a health point of view, but far from useless politically. The electorate don't like Johnny Foreigner and they feel that their country should be protected against barbarian invaders. So closing the borders goes down well with the groundlings, which, from a politician's point of view, is excellent. Nobody cares about the suffering caused by the closures -- families who are driven apart. People see this sort of cruelty as a good thing in fact -- like the refugee camps in Calais and Lesbos.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on December 07, 2021, 06:30:50 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 07, 2021, 01:55:20 AM
The border closures are total theatre. A useless gesture from a health point of view, but far from useless politically. The electorate don't like Johnny Foreigner and they feel that their country should be protected against barbarian invaders. So closing the borders goes down well with the groundlings, which, from a politician's point of view, is excellent. Nobody cares about the suffering caused by the closures -- families who are driven apart. People see this sort of cruelty as a good thing in fact -- like the refugee camps in Calais and Lesbos.

Yes, and worse. One researcher I heard interviewed on NPR said South Africa is being punished for having a testing program that discovered an early case and epidemiologists who managed to sequence the genome before anyone else. The danger is that this kind of "do something politics" will discourage those ahead of the curve from going public with the data and research we all need.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 06:32:26 AM
"A useless gesture from a health point of view, but far from useless politically." Like protesting masks, then?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 07:39:53 AM
U.S. coronavirus cases approach 50 million (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/07/covid-omicron-variant-live-updates/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 07, 2021, 07:50:23 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 07, 2021, 06:32:26 AM
"A useless gesture from a health point of view, but far from useless politically." Like protesting masks, then?

Do you mean 'protective masks' ?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 08:03:28 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 07, 2021, 07:50:23 AM
Do you mean 'protective masks' ?

Oh, indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 08:07:59 AM
Antibody treatment found effective against Omicron variant
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 08:11:02 AM
Large South African hospital group sees fewer severe COVID cases — 9:23 a.m.
By Bloomberg

Mediclinic International Ltd., one of South Africa's three biggest hospital groups, said while it is seeing an increased influx of Covid-19 patients "only a few require admission for further care."

The group, in a statement on Tuesday, said its seeing a greater proportion of children under 12 than in previous waves and many asymptomatic patients admitted for other ailments.

Of Covid-19 patients admitted 25% are vaccinated as are 16% of those in intensive care, the company said.

The variant "appears to be highly transmissible," Mediclinic said. Still, "so far, a lower percentage of admitted Covid-19 patients require intensive care and ventilation."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 08:14:20 AM
Kids in 5-14 age group show highest COVID rates in Europe, WHO says — 8:25 a.m.
By The Associated Press

The World Health Organization's office for Europe said Tuesday that children in the 5 to 14 age group now account for the highest rates of reported COVID-19 infection in the region.

WHO Europe regional director Dr. Hans Kluge also argued that vaccine mandates should be "an absolute last resort," and said that COVID-19 deaths remain "significantly below previous peaks." But he said that coronavirus cases and deaths have more than doubled in the last two months in the 53-country region stretching to central Asia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 07, 2021, 08:55:20 AM
In the UK they are saying that the doubling time of omicron is about two days, and that there are at least 1K cases here, maybe 2K. Assume 1K -- and assume it doubles 15 times between now and January 7.

1K,2K,4,8,16,32,64,128,256, 500k, 1M, 2M, 4M, 8M, 16M . . .

So basically we're all going to get omicron in the next four or five weeks.

I think on any scenario this is serious news -- even if omicron rarely produces serious illness in vaccinated people, it is serious news -- a small percentage of a large number is a large number.  Don't forget that in the Northern hemisphere the winter flu epidemic is about to start. It isn't a good time to need hospital care.

If it produces serious illness more often, it's a catastrophe, potentially apocalyptic,  and not one that's obviously avoidable. Was it avoidable three weeks ago? I don't know.

Anyway, I suggest we all stock up with some good wine, because there's nothing more that anyone can do. The ball is rolling.





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 09:44:44 AM
No one taught me that epidemiology is political — but it is

Our current triage has been as ineffective as it is unethical.

By Rachel R. Yorlets Updated December 6, 2021, 4:31 p.m.

As scientists-in-training, we are taught the parable of people drowning in a river. Medicine extends her hands to pull each person out while public health runs upstream to prevent people from falling into the water. The idea that some of these lives matter less than others is so unspeakable that we don't name it.

But the recent naming of the COVID-19 variant Omicron places health inequity in headlines once again. Across pathogens and places, pandemics are nothing if not socially driven: Widespread global efforts to control spread reach a tipping point after which the burden of infectious diseases is shifted to the shoulders of the poor. Slowly, the lettered plagues — TB, HIV, COVID — recede from the front page. One might argue that their unfolding is not newsworthy, since we have tolerated the poverty traps of these plagues for centuries, decades, and years, respectively.

Recent advocacy side-steps the need for global vaccine equity in favor of strategies that are complementary at best, such as increasing genomic sequencing within viral surveillance or restricting country-specific travel. Last week, President Biden addressed the National Institutes of Health with an updated pandemic plan. His proposal overlooks the one thing we have known from the start: The global community is in this together.

When vaccines became available one year after the first known case of COVID, the epidemiologic strategy was clear: To save the most lives, vaccine campaigns would have prioritized populations in which non-pharmaceutical interventions were not feasible. Immunization efforts would have sought out those in overcrowded housing, densely populated cities, migrant-dependent households, and settings with a high prevalence of people who are immunocompromised — to say nothing of the 3 billion people who lack access to soap and running water at home. Instead, the first immunizations were administered in populations that had the means to prevent and reduce transmission with face coverings, ventilation, testing, and isolation strategies, distanced outdoor gatherings, and working from home.

No one taught me that epidemiology is political. But it is.

About three-quarters of all doses have been administered in resource-rich settings. About 10 percent of all residents in the United States and Canada have received a booster — the same percentage of the entire African continent that has received any shots. The shock deepens when we reflect on the irony that pre-modern smallpox inoculation was brought to the New World colonies (to Boston, in fact) by an enslaved African man. Our current triage has been as ineffective as it is unethical. Pandemics are global by definition, so the critical threshold for herd immunity needs to be met throughout the human population; infectious diseases move with the people they infect. Worse, failure to meet this goal will enable the coronavirus to circulate and evolve, making it all the more difficult to eradicate.

In settings with vaccine access, leaders undermined equity by neglecting those experiencing vaccine hesitancy. Just as virologists warned in 2017 to prepare for SARS-like viruses, vaccine hesitancy was designated as a top-10 threat to global health by the World Health Organization the year before COVID emerged. It is not too late, and now more important than ever, to address the complex reasons why people decline vaccination. Overcoming hesitancy means tackling its causes through consistent messaging from both political and public health leadership:

▪ First, we must combat misinformation, cited by Anthony Fauci and other health experts, as a primary driver of hesitancy, and disinformation campaigns targeting vaccines. Fraudulent science is more easily found in an online search than, for example, the fact that vaccines prevent about five deaths every minute (pre-COVID).

▪ Second, we must confront historic events that have generated mistrust of health systems or governing bodies. Safe vaccines are often caught in the middle.

▪ Third, we must communicate that vaccines are a paradox of their own success. Vaccine-preventable diseases fade from our lived experience, tempting the idea that vaccines are no longer necessary (when in reality, disease incidence declines because of continued vaccinations).

▪ Finally, we cannot forget that these causes and others take hold quickly in a vacuum of education and support. Not only is patient-blaming antithetical to our ethos, but evidence also shows that shaming and labeling someone for their health behavior reinforces those decisions. We can empower vaccine uptake by providing information, building trust in public health, and engaging in respectful public dialogues. Low-cost interventions save lives.

Pandemics are neither unpredictable nor unprecedented. The phases common to all of them are denialism, activism, scientific research, and economic arguments. But as with other diseases that have spread worldwide, we long ago reached a point where we know enough to act. We have passed the time for debate over patents, profits, or production logistics. It is past time to vaccinate the global population, or else face the moral injury. It's not too late to run upstream. Until we do, we will live with the pandemics we choose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 07, 2021, 09:58:19 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 07, 2021, 09:44:44 AM
It is past time to vaccinate the global population, or else face the moral injury. It's not too late to run upstream. Until we do, we will live with the pandemics we choose.

Easier said than done. How would you distribute the vaccines in Africa?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 10:45:45 AM
Austria to keep lockdown restrictions in place for the unvaccinated

By Maite Fernández Simon1:50 p.m.

Austria plans to lift its coronavirus lockdown this Sunday while keeping restrictions in place for the unvaccinated, Chancellor Karl Nehammer said Tuesday.

Austria shut down restaurants and closed hotels for tourists Nov. 22 in an effort to bring down rising coronavirus rates, as Europe became the center of a new wave of the virus.

Nehammer, who took office Monday after the sudden resignation of Sebastian Kurz, which prompted a government crisis, said at a news conference that "the lockdown for the unvaccinated is staying," according to Reuters. Close to 68 percent of Austria's population is fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to Our World in Data.

The country has had a tougher stance toward people who are not vaccinated. It is the first country in Europe to mandate coronavirus vaccination for all starting in February, and it had imposed a lockdown for the unvaccinated a week before the Nov. 22 containment measures.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 07, 2021, 10:48:58 AM
CDC sees New York City anime convention as test case for omicron

By Brittany Shammas 1:42 p.m.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigators are taking an in-depth look at a New York City anime convention attended by a man who contracted one of the nation's first confirmed cases of the omicron variant of the coronavirus.

Speaking Tuesday during a White House coronavirus task force briefing, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said the agency was working with health officials in New York City and Minnesota, the home state of the infected man. They have been in touch with health agencies in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia and 27 other countries with residents who attended the convention.

Of the reported 53,000 attendees, they've made contact with about 35,000, encouraging them to get tested, Walensky said.

"Data from this investigation will provide some of the earliest looks in this country on the transmissibility of the variant," she said.

The convention ran Nov. 18-22 at the Javits Center, with vaccination and masks required. Peter McGinn, the Minnesota man who was infected with omicron, told The Washington Post he had mild symptoms and some fatigue over about two days. Several friends who attended the convention with the 30-year-old health-care consultant also contracted the virus.

McGinn credited his Johnson & Johnson vaccine and Moderna booster shot with protecting him from more serious symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 07, 2021, 01:33:40 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 07, 2021, 08:11:02 AM
Large South African hospital group sees fewer severe COVID cases — 9:23 a.m.
By Bloomberg

Mediclinic International Ltd., one of South Africa's three biggest hospital groups, said while it is seeing an increased influx of Covid-19 patients "only a few require admission for further care."

The group, in a statement on Tuesday, said its seeing a greater proportion of children under 12 than in previous waves and many asymptomatic patients admitted for other ailments.

Of Covid-19 patients admitted 25% are vaccinated as are 16% of those in intensive care, the company said.

The variant "appears to be highly transmissible," Mediclinic said. Still, "so far, a lower percentage of admitted Covid-19 patients require intensive care and ventilation."

To an extent, the best case scenario is if this variant causes mild symptoms and becomes the dominant strain, in which case this may mark the virus's turn into becoming something as manageable as the seasonal flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 07, 2021, 02:13:13 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 07, 2021, 01:38:10 PM
This would indeed be the way of all flesh pandemics --- all natural pandemics, I mean.

Oh, you mean like cholera, the bubonic plague, small pox and HIV/AIDS?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 07, 2021, 07:17:46 PM
as i recall a few people died back then
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on December 07, 2021, 07:38:22 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 07, 2021, 02:24:58 PM
What caused the bubonic plague to subdue in Middle Ages Europe? Certainly not the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. What then?

Brown rats replaced black rats, and human/rodent interaction became rarer.

From Wikipedia.
Quote
Appleby[78] considers six possible explanations:

People developed immunity.
Improvements in nutrition made people more resistant.
Improvements in housing, urban sanitation and personal cleanliness reduced the number of rats and rat fleas.
The dominant rat species changed. (The brown rat did not arrive in London until 1727.)
Quarantine methods improved in the 17th century.
Some rats developed immunity so fleas never left them in droves to humans, non-resistant rats were eliminated and this broke the cycle.
Synder suggests[79] that the replacement of the Black rat (Rattus rattus), which thrived among people and was frequently kept as a pet, by the more aggressive and prolific Norway or brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) was a major factor. The Brown rat, which arrived as an invasive species from the East, is skittish and avoids human contact, and their aggressive and asocial behavior made them less attractive to humans. As the Brown rat violently drove out the Black rat in country after country, becoming the dominant species in that ecological niche, rat-to-human contact declined, as did the opportunities for plague to pass from rat fleas to humans. One of the major demarcations for hot spots in the third plague pandemic was the places where the Black rat had yet to be replaced, such as Bombay (now Mumbai) in India.[citation needed] It has been suggested that evolutionary processes may have favored less virulent strains of the pathogen Yersinia pestis.[80]

In all probability, almost all of the existing hypotheses had some effect in bringing about the end of the pandemic, though the main cause may never be conclusively determined.[citation needed]

The disappearance happened rather later in the Nordic and eastern European countries but there was a similar halt after major epidemics.[citation needed]

Yersinia pestis still around, especially in wild rodents, and 20th/21st century cases seem to be associated with them.

Cholera was beaten not so much by medicine as it was by modern plumbing and sewage systems. Smallpox is the great example of a disease disappearing because of a vaccine. HIV/AIDS is controlled by medicine but certainly still present.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 07, 2021, 09:53:53 PM
"Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine partially protective against Omicron - Bloomberg News"

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pfizer-variant/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-partially-protective-against-omicron-bloomberg-news-idUKL4N2SS3RV
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 08, 2021, 02:20:50 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 07, 2021, 09:53:53 PM
"Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine partially protective against Omicron - Bloomberg News"

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pfizer-variant/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-partially-protective-against-omicron-bloomberg-news-idUKL4N2SS3RV

As far as I can see the observed reduction is at the antibody level,  not at the level of memory cells.

By the way, I hope you'll keep us informed how things are going in Denmark, which seems to be a bit at the eye of the omicron storm in Europe. Especially vis-à-vis hospitalisations and child illnesses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 08, 2021, 02:33:01 AM
Yes, but its probably going to take more time, before any good results appear, and as it is known from previous developments, initial surveys/hypotheses may contradict each other. Currently, media stories about omicron often do. 15 sewage sample stations around the country will now be mapping tendencies too.

Virus cases still going up here in DK generally, in spite of new restrictions as per Nov. 12th and Nov. 26th ... they'll probably introduce more today, though we're not talking about lock-downs. It will be curfews in night life etc.
The 3rd jab will be available earlier, now about 5 1/2 months after the second, not 6 months, so personally I might get a call for it during this weekend or so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 08, 2021, 02:54:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 08, 2021, 02:33:01 AM
Yes, but its probably going to take more time, before any good results appear, and as it is known from previous developments, initial surveys/hypotheses may contradict each other. Currently, media stories about omicron often do. 15 sewage sample stations around the country will now be mapping tendencies too.

Virus cases still going up here in DK generally, in spite of new restrictions as per Nov. 12th and Nov. 26th ... they'll probably introduce more today, though we're not talking about lock-downs. It will be curfews in night life etc.
The 3rd jab will be available earlier, now about 5 1/2 months after the second, not 6 months, so personally I might get a call for it during this weekend or so.

In the UK it's now 3 months for booster if your 40+. The world is taking a huge gamble on vaccines providing adequate omicron protection. If they're (we're) wrong, it'll be frightening; if they're (we're) right, it'll still be painful.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 08, 2021, 02:58:02 AM
Calling people in Japan - what's going on there? Why is there like, practically no Covid?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 08, 2021, 06:58:50 AM
     From the formerly failing newspaper of record:

     Pfizer Says its Booster Offers Significant Protection Against Omicron (https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/08/world/omicron-variant-covid/pfizer-says-blood-samples-showed-a-third-dose-of-its-vaccine-provides-significant-protection-against-omicron)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 08, 2021, 11:56:39 AM
Republicans' disregard for doctors on the coronavirus

By Aaron Blake
Senior reporter
Yesterday at 2:31 p.m. EST

For the better part of a year, the coronavirus vaccination effort has struggled mightily to appeal to a crucial group of holdouts: vaccine-skeptical Republicans. And for a time, the conventional wisdom settled upon a potential antidote: getting local doctors and local health experts to espouse the benefits of vaccination. Republicans might not listen to Anthony S. Fauci, the reasoning went, but maybe they'd listen to someone who was a fixture in their community.

But a new poll, conducted as vaccine skepticism remains quite intractable among Republicans, suggests even that approach carries diminishing returns.

The Gallup poll, released Tuesday, showed declining trust among Republicans not just in scientists or medical professionals writ large, but also in their own doctors.

In 2002 and 2010, at least 7 in 10 Republicans trusted the accuracy of important medical advice from their doctor — higher even than among Democrats at the time. It registered at 73 percent among Republicans in 2010.

Today, though, that number has fallen to 60 percent. And it's not the only evidence that Republicans increasingly mistrust the advice of health experts.

This is an important way to ask the question, because people often separate those around them from what is perceived as a broader problem.

If you ask whether people want to cast out members of Congress en masse, for instance, they will often say yes. But when you ask specifically about their own representative, people feel differently — and often overwhelmingly reelect them, even when Congress is at its most unpopular. (This owes in large part to polarization, of course, and to the lack of competent primary challengers. But people generally do like their own member of Congress much more than the institution as a whole.)

Ditto for the media, with people tending to mistrust the media more broadly but viewing their local media as more trustworthy than national outlets.

If there's a lesson from the Gallup poll and others, it's that Republicans' discontent with and mistrust of experts and institutions — which once largely exempted medical professionals — is growing, relatively speaking, and it appears to be extending even to local ones.

There is some mixed data on this. Earlier this year, an AP-NORC poll showed relatively little difference in trust in doctors overall, with 72 percent of Republicans trusting them at least "most of the time" and 77 percent of Democrats agreeing.

But that's a pretty low bar — "most of the time." And if you drill down deeper, you see the gaps widening.

In May 2020, toward the start of the coronavirus pandemic, Pew polling showed a spike in faith in scientists that didn't extend to Republicans. While the percentage of Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters who trusted medical scientists "a great deal" went from 37 percent in 2019 to 53 percent, it held level at about 3 in 10 Republicans and Republican leaners.

Nor is Gallup the only poll to show a yawning partisan gap. A Grinnell College poll conducted in October by pollster J. Ann Selzer found a huge split in the number of people who had "high" levels of trust in scientists to solve problems in their communities — 79 percent for Democrats versus 28 percent for Republicans — and a slightly smaller but still significant split on doctors — 71 percent for Democrats to 48 percent for Republicans.

That this split would also extend to one's own doctor makes it especially important. The gap isn't as big when you localize the issue, but it still speaks to the hurdles in getting people who won't listen to what amounts to the scientific consensus on vaccination.

It's perhaps not surprising that Republicans would be more skeptical of scientists, given the party's long-standing views on climate change and other issues, along with its general mistrust of the government and institutions. But to the extent that they are also more unwilling to listen to the medical experts close to them — and layer it on top of that wider mistrust of experts — it certainly reinforces why this problem is apparently here to stay.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 08, 2021, 12:03:27 PM
the greatest problem of our age is the unraveling of society. I've had friends estranged from their parents because their parents, addicted to Facebook, started to believe their own sons and daughters to be party to some sort of global conspiracy of elites. it's the end result of the pushing of purely individualist rhetoric.

at some point the town doctor was almost a member of the family. when he becomes considered party to the Global Mask and Vax Conspiracy, things have broken, very badly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 08, 2021, 12:29:37 PM
Quote from: fbjim on December 08, 2021, 12:03:27 PM
the greatest problem of our age is the unraveling of society. I've had friends estranged from their parents because their parents, addicted to Facebook, started to believe their own sons and daughters to be party to some sort of global conspiracy of elites. it's the end result of the pushing of purely individualist rhetoric.

at some point the town doctor was almost a member of the family. when he becomes considered party to the Global Mask and Vax Conspiracy, things have broken, very badly.
I don't know what to say.  I, personally, find it astonishing and horrifying that your friends' parents (whom I'm guessing that the friends are relatively young and that their parents are probably also relatively young....as in maybe early 50's or 40's??) feel like that they can't trust their own children!  Am I close here age-wise?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 08, 2021, 01:00:51 PM
I don't want to be reductive but: Facebook. If there's a reason I have little technological positivism, it's because we gave the tech industry unlimited money and freedom, and they used it to invent machines that turn people insane.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 08, 2021, 04:20:50 PM
Quote from: geralmar on December 08, 2021, 03:04:03 PM
Got my Pfizer booster last week.  All was fine for twelve hours, then suddenly developed a dull pain in my right side (injection was in right shoulder), staggered a few feet then collapsed in a ball against the bedroom door.  Waves of heat and too dizzy and weak to move for about ten minutes.  My head swam:  my wife insists I was unconscious; but I don't think so.  Took about a day to fully recover.  My guess is age and flu shot I got at the same time have something to do with it.  Gave my wife-- unvaccinated because of medical vulnerabilities-- quite a scare, though.

Incidentally, wife and I belong to a military veterans organization.  The chaplain for the group is a vociferous anti-vaxxer-- despite losing a niece to coronavirus earlier this year.  We learned two days ago he is in the hospital with coronavirus.  Two members of the organization have tested positive and others are rushing to be tested.  My wife and I detest the arrogant, misogynistic creep and have nothing to do with him; so we are not worried for ourselves.  A case of prophylactic antagonism, I guess.

Glad you've pulled through. Warm wishes to you & the missus!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 08, 2021, 05:40:51 PM
Quote from: fbjim on December 08, 2021, 01:00:51 PM
I don't want to be reductive but: Facebook. If there's a reason I have little technological positivism, it's because we gave the tech industry unlimited money and freedom, and they used it to invent machines that turn people insane.

It's not just Facebook, it's YouTube, as well, and other popular venues by which anyone can gain a platform and a following, if they profess to know things they may or may not, and are able to convince enough people through their arguments. This would seem to be a good thing, free information exchange to everyone worldwide, uncensored (in theory) by governments and other authoritative institutions. But that reckons without our ability as humans to fool ourselves into believing that someone knows what they're talking about, when in reality they are only confirming our own pre-existing biases.

A case in point is a friend of mine of whom I wrote earlier in this thread (I think), a retired nurse, who should know better, but who has latched onto the FLCCC, "Dr." John Campbell, and the Jimmy Dore Show and has become convinced that the vaccines are far more dangerous than admitted by the medical community; that Fauci is an inveterate liar who shouldn't be believed (worse than Trump, apparently, whom she also detests); that Ivermectin is more effective in treating and even preventing infection than the vaccines, and safer; and that the regulatory agencies only approved the vaccines because they were bought off by Pfizer. The media also, she says, do not report the many terrible and crippling adverse reactions that have occurred from the vaccines because they, too, are controlled by Pfizer and other drug companies.

She is not a Republican. This phenomenon is hardly limited to Republicans. She is just anti-corporate, and has found bloggers and podcasters who echo her beliefs and also tell her that what mainstream sources are reporting is false and controlled by corporations. An extreme and potentially tragic case of confirmation bias... I think we have all seen lots of examples of this, but when it happens to a friend, or a family member, it really hits home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 08, 2021, 11:15:41 PM
There was a song from "Hair" which had the lines "This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius" as the beginning of its chorus. Of course the Age of Aquarius didn't eventuate.

However, what we have now is the 'Age of the Nutjob'! People who, because it appears on social media, believe it to be true and take it a step further by propagating it. They are taken in by the smooth but powerful rhetoric of the presenters. They never question what they are presented with. They never fact check (which isn't hard to do). Psychological profilers have been talking about the 'drama hook' for a few decades now. People who must have drama in their lives and actively seek it out. Social media will easily provide them with this drama. The bottom line is that these people, no matter how educated the think themselves to be, are basically ignorant. It's a true indication of the dumbing down of society. There are millions of them out there and you won't be able to convince them that they could be wrong.

There is one major concern for me. The propaganda from both social and regular media makes me cast my mind back to events from the 1930s. If Josef Goebbels was alive today he no doubt would be absolutely delighted with what he would be seeing.

I take great delight in 'teasing' these dickbrains and they can't help themselves. I do it by asking them to elaborate on any of their statements. After listening to them without interrupting, my response is always prefaced by the word 'but' which really requires them to elaborate even further. I never disagree, I just ask for further elaboration. They eventually give up in frustration and I am secure in the knowledge that they won't bother me again with their silly and unsupported ideas.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 08, 2021, 11:52:20 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 08, 2021, 04:20:50 PM
Glad you've pulled through. Warm wishes to you & the missus!

Concerning the quoted post, a relative I have, aged 64 and not with the best health, recently agreed to have a double dose of flu vaccine, as part of a medicine survey; she's not overly sensitive, but felt bad and that she mostly had to lie down for 4-5 days afterwards. Several vaccines simultaneously can be a bad thing.

EDIT: I had no inconveniences at all concerning my 2 Covid vaccinations (Pfizer) and 2 flu vaccines, spread out during the last 1.5 years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on December 09, 2021, 01:24:32 AM
I am sorry to hear of people having adverse reaction to Covid jabs. In the last 18 months or so I have had a flu jab, two AZ jabs, another flu jab and a Pfizer booster jab. Only the first flu jab produced any ill-effects - a painful arm and flu-like symptoms for a couple of days. I got a slight ache in the arm for a day or so from the Pfizer jab but it wasn't particularly painful. With so many people getting these jabs I suppose it is inevitable some will react badly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 02:14:35 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 08, 2021, 11:15:41 PM
People who, because it appears on social media, believe it to be true and take it a step further by propagating it. They are taken in by the smooth but powerful rhetoric of the presenters. They never question what they are presented with. They never fact check (which isn't hard to do). [...] The bottom line is that these people, no matter how educated the think themselves to be, are basically ignorant. It's a true indication of the dumbing down of society. There are millions of them out there and you won't be able to convince them that they could be wrong.

Your analysis is correct and the sad thing is that even if you substitute mainstream media for social media it still remains valid. The propaganda in the former is no less relentless than in the latter and the gulllibility level of their respective audiences is probably the same.

Quote
If Josef Goebbels was alive today he no doubt would be absolutely delighted with what he would be seeing.

Propaganda  has progressed exponentially since Goebbels' times and features achievements of which he could have only dreamed of. Could he have convinced the whole world that Saddam Hussein has WMDs? That the Serbs are Nazis who have set up concentration camps? (this one in particular would probably give him an orgasmic pleasure...) Or that it's legitimate and moral that Iraq be invaded because a bunch of mostly Saudis and Pakistanis assembled in Afghanistan conspired to produce 9/11 which was acted mostly by Saudis and Egyptians? I doubt it.

In this respect, see my second signature line.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 05:11:05 AM
Quote from: krummholz on December 08, 2021, 05:40:51 PM
The media also, she says, do not report the many terrible and crippling adverse reactions that have occurred from the vaccines because they, too, are controlled by Pfizer and other drug companies.

What she probably means is that Pfizer's two top owners, The Vanguard Group, Inc and BlackRock Fund Advisors are also top owners of The New York Times, CNN, Fox, ABC News, NBC News, MSNBC and Slate.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/company-insights/082316/top-10-shareholders-pfizer-pfe.asp (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/company-insights/082316/top-10-shareholders-pfizer-pfe.asp)

https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/futureofmedia/index-us-mainstream-media-ownership (https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/futureofmedia/index-us-mainstream-media-ownership)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 09, 2021, 05:47:17 AM
Ron Johnson of Wisconsin never tires of being a nozzle in the flow of bad information:

A GOP senator suggested gargling mouthwash to kill the coronavirus. Doctors and Listerine are skeptical.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: krummholz on December 08, 2021, 05:40:51 PM
It's not just Facebook, it's YouTube, as well, and other popular venues by which anyone can gain a platform and a following, if they profess to know things they may or may not, and are able to convince enough people through their arguments. This would seem to be a good thing, free information exchange to everyone worldwide, uncensored (in theory) by governments and other authoritative institutions. But that reckons without our ability as humans to fool ourselves into believing that someone knows what they're talking about, when in reality they are only confirming our own pre-existing biases.

A case in point is a friend of mine of whom I wrote earlier in this thread (I think), a retired nurse, who should know better, but who has latched onto the FLCCC, "Dr." John Campbell, and the Jimmy Dore Show and has become convinced that the vaccines are far more dangerous than admitted by the medical community; that Fauci is an inveterate liar who shouldn't be believed (worse than Trump, apparently, whom she also detests); that Ivermectin is more effective in treating and even preventing infection than the vaccines, and safer; and that the regulatory agencies only approved the vaccines because they were bought off by Pfizer. The media also, she says, do not report the many terrible and crippling adverse reactions that have occurred from the vaccines because they, too, are controlled by Pfizer and other drug companies.

She is not a Republican. This phenomenon is hardly limited to Republicans. She is just anti-corporate, and has found bloggers and podcasters who echo her beliefs and also tell her that what mainstream sources are reporting is false and controlled by corporations. An extreme and potentially tragic case of confirmation bias... I think we have all seen lots of examples of this, but when it happens to a friend, or a family member, it really hits home.


In the same way as the actual crimes of people like Jeffrey Epstein give child trafficking conspiracies credit, the grand ways that governments and experts have fallen flat on their face in our lifetimes- the 2008 crash, the Iraq War, even going back to Vietnam- give credibility to all conspiracy theories.

To an extent the loss of faith in expertise and government is well-deserved. Conspiracy thinking is not a replacement for that, however. It is far easier to engage in conspiracy thinking than it is to attempt to think critically and weigh the credibility of statements against each other. Believing nothing you hear is not a tenable philosophy unless one wants to recreate the laws of physics from first principles. After all, how do you know the value of an electron's charge is really what the Elites say it is? The oil-drop experiment? Do you have tangible, physical proof that it actually took place, and that the values weren't made up by The Elites?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 09, 2021, 05:50:01 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 05:47:25 AM

In the same way as the actual crimes of people like Jeffrey Epstein give child trafficking conspiracies credit, the grand ways that governments and experts have fallen flat on their face in our lifetimes- the 2008 crash, the Iraq War, even going back to Vietnam- give credibility to all conspiracy theories.

To an extent the loss of faith in expertise and government is well-deserved. Conspiracy thinking is not a replacement for that, however. It is far easier to engage in conspiracy thinking than it is to attempt to think critically and weigh the credibility of statements against each other. Believing nothing you hear is not a tenable philosophy unless one wants to recreate the laws of physics from first principles. After all, how do you know the value of an electron's charge is really what the Elites say it is? The oil-drop experiment? Do you have tangible, physical proof that it actually took place, and that the values weren't made up by The Elites?

I appreciate both the serious import of your post, and the tassels of wry humor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 06:53:30 AM
It's only a half-joke. This kind of reasoning - that you can't believe anything from any source (except, of course the ones approved by the conspiracy community) and that only first-hand knowledge is valid, is common among the conspiracy-minded. You saw it with the flat-earthers, and though that's kind of a joke, you still see the same attitude that instead of critically weighing the likelihood of bias, falsehood and and all that, it's easier to simply say that everything out of "authoratative" sources is considered bunk by default.

One of the more common things I'm seeing is how global warming is a hoax designed to get the average Westerner to lower their standards of living while the elites live it up. The sad part is that this isn't *entirely* untrue, as a) combating climate change probably *will* require some sort of lifestyle adjustments to reduce consumption of things like fuel, and b) extremely rich people do tend to be insulated from such things. But most popular conspiracies aren't based entirely on absurdities- many have basis in fact*, which gives them a measure of credibility.


*one joke i've heard is the "conspiracy of conspiracies" - that conspiracy theories exist to discredit reports of the actual unseemly actions of intelligence agencies, governments, and those in power.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2021, 07:31:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 08, 2021, 04:20:50 PM
Glad you've pulled through. Warm wishes to you & the missus!
+1

So very sorry (and distressed) to hear of your reaction!  It must have been very scary for both of you.

Good to hear though that you're feeling back to normal.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 10:07:04 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 05:47:25 AM
Believing nothing you hear is not a tenable philosophy unless one wants to recreate the laws of physics from first principles. After all, how do you know the value of an electron's charge is really what the Elites say it is? The oil-drop experiment? Do you have tangible, physical proof that it actually took place, and that the values weren't made up by The Elites?

Strawman. I'm absolutely sure that from the contexts of my post you did understand perfectly well to what that dictum applies. In the very unlikely case that you didn't, though, I spell it out for you now: to media (all of them) and their propaganda. Physics has got nothing to do with it.

As for conspiracy theory, in some cases it's a misnomer: there is no conspiracy. Many things have been announced publicly months before their actually taking place.

For instance, Bill Gates on March 19, 2020: Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.

https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/A-coronavirus-AMA (https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/A-coronavirus-AMA)

That whole thing is worth reading in full. He speaks with unshakable authority and confidence, as if he were simultaneously an epidemiologist, a public health expert and the world's self-appointed Minister of Health. He's none of those things, obviously, so he is no more entitled to speak about the issue than me, a mechanical engineer, or Karl Henning, a composer and clarinetist. And yet at times he seems strangely prescient.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 10:22:35 AM
...OK? I could have told you that there would likely be vaccine documentation. Such things literally exist, and have existed for years, for childhood vaccinations for polio, for instance. Remarkably, at least here, the fears of some sort of microchip nightmare have not come to pass as the documentation is simply a piece of paper. Many people also accurately predicted that the next variant of concern would likely come from a place like Africa - is this "strangely prescient" or people using their expertise to predict that a large population of people with very low vaccine uptake would be a good ground for mutations to form?

This seems very much like a heads-I-win-tails-you-lose problem. Inaccurate predictions and statements show the media can not be trusted. Accurate predictions show they are in on the conspiracy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 10:26:44 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 09, 2021, 10:22:35 AM
...OK? I could have told you that there would likely be vaccine documentation. Such things literally exist, and have existed for years, for childhood vaccinations for polio, for instance. Remarkably, at least here, the fears of some sort of microchip nightmare have not come to pass as the documentation is simply a piece of paper. Many people also accurately predicted that the next variant of concern would likely come from a place like Africa - is this "strangely prescient" or people using their expertise to predict that a large population of people with very low vaccine uptake would be a good ground for mutations to form?

This seems very much like a heads-I-win-tails-you-lose problem. Inaccurate predictions and statements show the media can not be trusted. Accurate predictions show they are in on the conspiracy.

I just told you there's no conspiracy. And I don't remember ever talking about microchips.

Anyway it's more than obvious that we shall never be on the same page so it's better to agree to disagree and leave it at that. At least this is what I'm going to do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 09, 2021, 10:36:25 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 02:14:35 AM
Your analysis is correct and the sad thing is that even if you substitute mainstream media for social media it still remains valid. The propaganda in the former is no less relentless than in the latter and the gulllibility level of their respective audiences is probably the same.

That's how I see it ever since we discovered some ten years ago that vets were ripping us off for medicines less effective than natural remedies, followed by ineffective and contradictory advice from our own doctors, the pushing of dangerous statin drugs to the father in law, the next door neighbour being killed by a medicine with known contraindications, the massive disinformation about cholesterol, fat, diabetes, Brexit, Trump and now COVID. It would be a completely different society if it wasn't all about suppressing truth to make money. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 10:44:05 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 09, 2021, 10:36:25 AM
That's how I see it ever since we discovered some ten years ago that vets were ripping us off for medicines less effective than natural remedies, followed by ineffective and contradictory advice from our own doctors, the pushing of dangerous statin drugs to the father in law, the next door neighbour being killed by a medicine with known contraindications, the massive disinformation about cholesterol, fat, diabetes, Brexit, Trump and now COVID. It would be a completely different society if it wasn't all about suppressing truth to make money. :(

Conspiracy theorist!  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 09, 2021, 10:47:59 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 10:44:05 AM
Conspiracy theorist!  :P

Any group of people discussing in private how to manipulate others is a conspiracy. For example a marketing team working out how to sell a new breakfast cereal.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 10:52:48 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 09, 2021, 10:47:59 AM
Any group of people discussing in private how to manipulate others is a conspiracy. For example a marketing team working out how to sell a new breakfast cereal.  ::)

Why, of course.  ;)

Good ol' Adam Smith knew it long time ago: People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 11:23:40 AM
Btw, whether omicron variant originated in unvaccinated people is a matter of speculation; it might have or it might have not. What we do know is that in South Africa it was first detected in vaccinated people as well and that at least in the USA, The Netherlands and Romania the first cases were detected among vaccinated people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 09, 2021, 11:29:02 AM
Long covid is destroying careers, leaving economic distress in its wake

By Christopher Rowland
Today at 10:23 a.m. EST

Before the coronavirus ruined her plans, Tiffany Patino expected to be back at work by now. She and her boyfriend intended to move out of a basement in suburban Maryland, where his grandmother lets them stay for free, so they could raise their infant son in a place of their own. Maybe get a new car.

But Patino got sick with covid-19 more than a year ago. Instead of getting better, chronic exhaustion and other symptoms persisted, delaying her return to a restaurant job and swamping her goal of financial independence. After reaching what she calls her "hell-iversary" last month, Patino remains unable to rejoin the workforce. With no income of her own, she's exhausted, racked with pain, short of breath, forgetful, bloated, swollen, depressed.

At 28 years old, she can barely take her baby to the playground. "I go on a walk, and I have to use the stroller like a walker," she said. "Whatever life I have right now, it's more like surviving. I'm not living my dream. I'm living a nightmare."

Across America, many of the nearly 50 million people infected with the coronavirus continue to suffer from some persistent symptoms, with a smaller subset experiencing such unbearable fatigue and other maladies that they can't work, forcing them to drop out of the workforce, abandon careers and rack up huge debts.

Hard data is not available and estimates vary widely, but based on published studies and their own experience treating patients, several medical specialists said 750,000 to 1.3 million patients likely remain so sick for extended periods that they can't return to the workforce full time.

Long covid is testing not just the medical system, but also government safety nets that are not well suited to identifying and supporting people with a newly emerging chronic disease that has no established diagnostic or treatment plan. Insurers are denying coverage for some tests, the public disability system is hesitant to approve many claims, and even people with long-term disability insurance say they are struggling to get benefits.

Employers are also being tested, as they must balance their desire to get workers back on the job full time with the realities of a slow recovery for many patients.

"They are suffering in dramatic ways, and in ways that have altered their lives and placed them in financial peril," said Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist and scientist at Yale University and Yale New Haven Hospital.

The Washington Post interviewed more than 30 people around the country experiencing the sudden financial slide caused by the long form of the disease. They have been laid off and fired, quit jobs, shuttered businesses. They described falling behind on rent, mortgages and car payments. Some worried about losing their housing.

Depression and anxiety that are part of the brutal mix of long covid symptoms are exacerbated by despair over vanishing income. From health-care professionals and small-business operators to government employees and warehouse supervisors, the patients expressed fears about never being able to return to work.

Many people with long covid, often referred to as "long haulers," experience mild symptoms to begin with, then get stuck with months of chronic fatigue, shortness of breath, confusion and memory loss, erratic and racing heartbeats, radical spikes in blood pressure, painful rashes, shooting pains and gastrointestinal problems.

The government calls it post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2, or PASC. The National Institutes of Health is spending $1.15 billion to study the syndrome. The symptoms sometimes subside, lulling long haulers into a false sense of relief, only to come roaring back after performing simple chores like vacuuming a living room or raking leaves.

Patino is afraid to carry her son for too long, worried she will drop him. She takes naps every day. If she did return to work as a server or host in a restaurant, she fears she would quickly get fired for missing work.

"I just feel so old. I feel so tired. When you are dealing with so many symptoms, every day it's like a lottery pick," Patino said.

Doctors treating long haulers say the symptoms cut across race and class lines.

"I have hundreds of patients who have had to take time off for long periods of time, quit their jobs, or get fired from their jobs, or take lesser-paying jobs" because of long covid, said Janna Friedly, vice chair for clinical affairs at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine, where she and her team are helping long haulers build strength and return to work.

On top of the loss of income, some patients lose their employer-sponsored health insurance when they can't work. "I've seen patients who have gone from fully insured to not being able to come back and see me in clinic in the middle of our treatment because they have lost their job and no longer can afford to seek care," Friedly said.

Even for those who do have insurance, treating long covid can be unusually complicated and costly, since it's a new disease without an established diagnostic or treatment plan and coverage for certain tests may be denied.

Health insurance companies, citing the blizzard of tests being ordered, say they are waiting for data-driven protocols to emerge so they can match insurance coverage with the best testing and treatment strategies for long covid.

"In many cases, the kitchen sink approach is not helping," said Michael Sherman, chief medical officer of Point32Health, a nonprofit insurance company in Massachusetts formed from the merger of Harvard-Pilgrim and Tufts health plans. Until research is published into what tests and treatments work, he said, "there's a lack of evidence that anyone can look to."

'This virus took my career'

The cognitive and emotional impacts also make it difficult for patients to navigate the bureaucratic tangles required to keep health insurance and file disability claims after a job loss.

John Buccellato, 64, an emergency medicine doctor at an urgent care clinic on Manhattan's Upper East Side, was hospitalized with the virus in March 2020, in the same hospital where his mother died of covid.

In a matter of days, he went from treating patients at a busy clinic to being engulfed in a health crisis as covid attacked his lungs and vascular system. Severe cognitive and emotional strain left him unable to manage his day-to-day affairs.

Overwhelmed by brain fog and the sense of loss over his career, he frequently sobbed on the phone as he described his struggles in an interview, including the loss of his employer-sponsored insurance.

A clinical neuropsychologist treating him, Gudrun Lange, said Buccellato experienced brain bleeds and a tumor. He repeats himself and seems easily confused.

"He starts getting emotional, involuntary crying, and there's nothing he can do about it," she said.

Buccellato said he has tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid medical bills that accumulated when he first lost his health insurance. He has some property and savings, but no weekly cash flow, he said. He signed up for COBRA, which provides a continuation of health insurance after a job loss, but after congressionally approved waivers that made it free expired in September, it now costs $922 a month, he said.

Garage operators briefly impounded his Lexus because he could no longer pay the $400 a month to park the car, he said. Now it's on the street, accumulating tickets.

Buccellato said he recognizes his career is prematurely over, but he can't figure out how to dig himself out of his worsening financial predicament. A lawyer helped him file a disability claim with the Social Security Administration, which a member of his support team said was recently successful. Because he left work for medical reasons, he was not eligible for unemployment insurance.

"This virus took my career away. I can't do anything in the medical field right now. Nobody is going to hire me," he said.

Other patients who experienced a similar plunge in income with the loss of their professional careers described their new reliance on government aid.

Chimere Smith, 39, a middle school teacher in Baltimore who has testified in Congress about covid's impact on her life, has not worked since she caught the virus in the early weeks of the pandemic.

She has blown through $12,000 in savings and is on food stamps.

She said the sense of loss is profound because she worked her way up from a childhood in a poor area of Washington, D.C. Before she got sick, she had hoped to become a school principal.

"I was following the trajectory of what I was told for years to be successful and Black in the world," she said, "and to have it all taken away by illness is a loss that I don't think I'll ever recover from. Even using the word devastation doesn't really capture the full scope of my experience."

She also plans to apply for disability assistance.

But many patients applying for disability insurance benefits are initially denied and require lengthy appeals, according to patients, doctors and lawyers, in part because the medical community is still grappling with how to diagnose their symptoms.

The Social Security Administration said in an email that it has received 16,000 covid-related disability claims since December 2020, but the agency would not disclose how many of those were approved or denied.

Patients, advocates and lawyers said private disability insurers, which offer long-term disability coverage through employee benefit plans, have also been denying many claims.

For individuals who said they can't work, the denials are frustrating. Michael Heidenberg, 48, of White Plains, N.Y., was unable to return to his $60,000 a year job as an academic adviser at Berkeley College, a regional for-profit college that kept him on for four months beyond the 12 weeks of unpaid leave required by the Family Medical Leave Act requirement. The college said it could not keep him on the books longer because it would create a hardship for his department, he said.

Heidenberg had purchased long-term disability insurance through his former employer, which promised a benefit of $3,100 a month, up to $150,000.

But Reliance Standard, the insurance carrier, recently denied his first application, saying he could do his job sitting down.

Heidenberg said that does not take into account his inability to concentrate for long periods and the dangerous spikes in his blood pressure since he contracted covid last year. Asked to discuss the denial, Reliance Standard said it would not comment on an individual claimant.

While he prepares for an appeal, Heidenberg said he and his wife, Alexis, are trying to figure out how to keep their apartment, which costs $1,700 a month, and cover COBRA health insurance, which is $1,200. He opted for COBRA over Medicaid or the Affordable Care Act exchanges because COBRA covers all the doctors he needs, he said.

"Finding doctors who are well-versed in treating post-covid patients has been incredibly difficult," Heidenberg said.

Still, his COBRA eligibility will expire in March 2022 and he will need to find new insurance. Mike and Alexis set up a GoFundMe page, which has raised $12,000. Alexis receives $988 a month in federal disability benefits because of a fibromyalgia diagnosis in 2012. That is currently their only income.

If they have to sell their apartment, they fear they will be priced out of White Plains, where they both grew up. Heidenberg expects his financial problems will get worse.

"It's just this incredibly scary freight train coming right at us," Heidenberg said. "You blame yourself. I was the primary breadwinner, and now we're struggling because I got sick."

In Kaufman, Tex., a small town 20 miles outside of Dallas, Angie Smith, 44, has slipped behind on $750-a-month payments on her Nissan Frontier pickup truck, which she bought when she was making more than $50,000 a year as an orthodontist assistant.

She said she was laid off in March 2020. She got covid eight months later and has been plagued by fatigue, shortness of breath, joint pain and spikes in body temperature ever since.

Unemployment checks that kept her financially afloat ended in September.

She said she had $150 in her checking account in mid-November and $1,400 in rent due in December. Friends from church have helped her hunt for jobs she can do over the phone from home.

"If I lose my house, then I could possibly set up my computer at someone's house. If I lose my truck, I can still work from home," she said. "I have so many of these scenarios going on in my head that I don't know what to do."

Nearly all of the patients interviewed by The Post said they wanted to return to work but could not figure out how to get back on the path to productivity.

"Employers are not used to dealing with this kind of work situation. Patients are often told, 'Just come back when you're 100 percent,' which could be a really long time out," said Greg Vanichkachorn, a family physician and occupational medicine specialist at the Mayo Clinic who is treating long-haul patients.

Employers and patients need to understand that many long haulers should return to work on a limited, part-time basis, perhaps working from home, while they slowly work on building strength, he said.

Seattle resident Eileen Hood thought she was ready to begin earning money again.

Hood got sick with covid in October 2020, forcing her this year to close the small business she had run with a friend for 15 years, selling wigs, specialized clothing and other needs for cancer patients. Hood's attempt to return to the job she loved ended in frustration.

"Forty minutes into my last wig-fitting, with a lovely lady, I just simply did not have enough air or energy to finish," she said.

The $70,000 per year she drew from the shop has evaporated, cutting her family's income in half.

She is 53 years old and wants to get back to work. Hood said she went to a job interview in October but was forced to cancel her appointment for the second interview in November.

"I went out and raked some leaves and made dinner for my family, and the next day, I couldn't get out of bed," she said. "It's the roller coaster of living with long covid."

Feeling 'worthless'

At the onset of the shutdowns in March 2020, Patino lost her job as a server at Firebirds Wood Fired Grill in suburban Maryland. Her boyfriend was laid off from another restaurant around the same time.

"We had to sign up for unemployment, and I was pregnant," Patino said.

Two months after the September birth of her baby, Leon, she tested positive for the coronavirus.

Her symptoms were moderate, but she could no longer nurse her baby. She was first told she was probably suffering from postpartum depression, she said. She went for a second opinion and staff found signs of the classic "ground-glass" pneumonia in her lungs, she said.

"Almost a month later, right before Christmas, I was still feeling crappy, still feeling tired," she said. By January, she went back to the hospital and was told she might be a "long hauler."

"The doctor's like, 'In a few months, by March, by April, by the summer, you should be much better,' " Patino said.

But as summer passed into fall, with no more unemployment checks and winter approaching, her symptoms persisted, some of them strange: "I got my taste back and smell is still iffy. It comes and goes. I will smell smoke; I will smell gasoline. Sometimes I smell feces."

Patino said she endures an isolated and depressing existence, knowing that many people are returning to normal while her plans remain on hold. She has considered trying an office job where she could work while seated but worries she would have to call in sick too often. Getting an apartment and a new car to replace their 2007 Kia remain out of reach, she said.

"I just feel like kind of a worthless person," she said. "I can't even do something like taking care of my child, cooking dinner, doing laundry and typical stay-at-home mom stuff."

With long covid, she said, "my world shattered, and everything just came crumbling down."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2021, 12:18:29 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 09, 2021, 11:29:02 AM
Long covid is destroying careers, leaving economic distress in its wake

By Christopher Rowland
Today at 10:23 a.m. EST
Hard to read stories like this Karl.   :( Where did you read this article?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 09, 2021, 12:47:11 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 09, 2021, 12:18:29 PM
Hard to read stories like this Karl.   :( Where did you read this article?

PD

The Washington Post, PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 10, 2021, 01:07:05 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 09, 2021, 11:29:02 AM
Long covid is destroying careers, leaving economic distress in its wake

This is what happens in a society with a "fend for yourself" philosophy...

BTW Wouldn't these people be in the same predicament if they would be struck by another debilitating disease, like cancer?


But whatever kind of society, Long Covid is going to be a long term burden for the economy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 10, 2021, 03:23:23 AM
Quote from: Que on December 10, 2021, 01:07:05 AM
This is what happens in a society with a "fend for yourself" philosophy...

BTW Wouldn't these people be in the same predicament if they would be struck by another debilitating disease, like cancer?


But whatever kind of society, Long Covid is going to be a long term burden for the economy.

It's a bit like IBS in that respect. Omicron is hopefully the new gastroenteritis - nasty, you can shake it off, rarely chronic, a few people die. The bad news is that we're ALL going to get it in the next three months!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 10, 2021, 06:23:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 05:11:05 AM
What she probably means is that Pfizer's two top owners, The Vanguard Group, Inc and BlackRock Fund Advisors are also top owners of The New York Times, CNN, Fox, ABC News, NBC News, MSNBC and Slate.





     Of course, and I own Vanguard and BlackRock funds, as do a gazillion others. At the next shareholders meeting I'll vote to acquire Romanian religions and turn their temples into abortion clinics. If I can't do the most nefarious imaginable things, what's the point of free market capitalism?

     After all, we are not Communists.

     (https://www.epsilontheory.com/wp-content/uploads/godfather-dinner.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 10, 2021, 06:53:52 AM
     The way to filter the news is to apply common sense analytic tools to the problem. I use information density as a component. MSNBC is like Fox in its ideological fervor. If I didn't apply the density criteria I would watch both and weigh opinion against opinion. Instead I watch MSNBC, which is information rich (as anyone who has gritted their teeth and sat through a Rachel Maddow lecture knows). As beliefy as Rachel is, she is even more facty. One can learn something, and that is even more important than the entertainment one derives from the ideological comfort food her presentations provide.

     Fox does the comfort food thing, too. By the information criteria, though, it's a desert. If you are watching Fox when a big story breaks you immediately switch to another news outlet to find out what's happening, because that's more important than the usual harangues about how biased everyone but Fox is.

     I have no use for the "bias bias". What I care about is getting facts and analysis by those qualified to produce it. My criteria amounts to the idea is that the truth is falsifiable but hasn't been falsified. I judge individuals and media on their track record. They are either reliable but fallible or unreliable. Bias is what you try to filter out if reliability matters to you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 10, 2021, 06:58:13 AM
one thing i've been told is that if you ignore editorials, WSJ and Financial Times tend to be very reliable factually because there's a big incentive to not BS around when it comes to the people who actually read those outlets. (especially ignore editorials with WSJ, which has one of the worst editorial sections on the planet)



Politico and The Atlantic are also "valuable" for showing what the current "establishment" center-left point-of-view is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 10, 2021, 07:20:01 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 10, 2021, 06:53:52 AM
     

     I have no use for the "bias bias". What I care about is getting facts and analysis by those qualified to produce it. My criteria amounts to the idea is that the truth is falsifiable but hasn't been falsified. I judge individuals and media on their track record. They are either reliable but fallible or unreliable. Bias is what you try to filter out if reliability matters to you.

What are the consequences of sick pay levels for people's willingness to isolate?
Does the risk/reward equation for vaccinating children mean that they have a greater reward than risk?
How effective are the actual uses that people make of face coverings at inhibiting transmission?
Is it less damaging to the population's health to keep schools open?
What are the consequences of the actual uses of ventilation in the the workplace and in education? What ventilation systems, if any, should be mandated?


. . .

These are some questions where the are very few if any undisputed facts and there is no consensus.

Everyone who has studied epistemology 101 when they were a first year undergrad knows that science is like this. Consensus is arrived at not be identifying "facts" and finding the unique theories which explain them. It is more complex, and more sociological, than that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 10, 2021, 07:30:58 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 10, 2021, 07:20:01 AM
What are the consequences of sick pay levels for people's willingness to isolate?
Does the risk/reward equation for vaccinating children mean that they have a greater reward than risk?
How effective are the actual uses that people make of face coverings at inhibiting transmission?
Is it less damaging to the population's health to keep schools open?
What are the consequences of the actual uses of ventilation in the the workplace and the education? What ventilation systems, if any should be mandated?


. . .

These are some questions where the are very few if any undisputed facts and there is no consensus.

Everyone who has studied Philosophy of Science 101 when they were a first year undergrad knows that science is like this. Consensus is arrived at not be identifying "facts" and finding the unique theories which explain them. It is more complex, and more sociological, than that.

     I differentiate the science from the sociology of its acceptance, and rational people do this all the time. One can judge the facts and the consensus, and note how these progress over time. I don't deny the problem is real, I embrace it and seek to arrive at the most reasonable tentative conclusion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 10, 2021, 07:34:49 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 10, 2021, 07:30:58 AM
     I differentiate the science from the sociology of its acceptance,  and rational people do this all the time. One can judge the facts and the consensus, and note how these progress over time. I don't deny the problem is real, I embrace it and seek to arrive at the most reasonable tentative conclusion.

I think the concepts you use: science, reason, fact etc, are essentially tied to human practices and institutions, and so to that extent are social. But this is not the place maybe to pursue it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 11, 2021, 05:57:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 10, 2021, 07:20:01 AM
These are some questions where the are very few if any undisputed facts and there is no consensus.

Everyone who has studied epistemology 101 when they were a first year undergrad knows that science is like this. Consensus is arrived at not be identifying "facts" and finding the unique theories which explain them. It is more complex, and more sociological, than that.

There also seems to be widespread acceptance of medical "scientists" and "scientific advisors" as if they were experts in fields of "hard science" such as physics or chemistry.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 11, 2021, 07:21:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 05:11:05 AMWhat she probably means is that Pfizer's two top owners, The Vanguard Group, Inc and BlackRock Fund Advisors are also top owners of The New York Times, CNN, Fox, ABC News, NBC News, MSNBC and Slate.


Both of these firms are among the largest shareholders of all publicly traded firms in the US because they manage the largest index funds in the world.  They may not be (are not) pursuing activist policies that seek to influence companies' policies.  In fact, doing so would violate the fund charters in most cases.  Just sayin'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 07:30:05 AM
Omicron at 1840 cases totally here in DK, 44% more than yesterday's total. Of which 74% had had 2 jabs, and 10% already had their 3rd.
The vaccines presumably tend to secure a milder case of infection. Yet 21 omicron cases in hospital, or a little above 1%. Of which 2/3 were hospitalized within 2 days of their positive test, corresponding to previous information about the disease behaving quicker generally.

Total virus case numbers going down for the last two days, maybe because of restrictions, but omicron could very well be changing it; maybe it will dominate in just 1-2 weeks.

3rd jab was moved forward, especially via decisions and official encouragements yesterday evening, and luckily, I was able to get mine even today, at noon.
1 km queue and procedures took 1.5 hours, even here in Copenhagen, which isn't bad logistically, with such a short notice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: BasilValentine on December 11, 2021, 07:34:16 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 09, 2021, 11:23:40 AM
Btw, whether omicron variant originated in unvaccinated people is a matter of speculation; it might have or it might have not. What we do know is that in South Africa it was first detected in vaccinated people as well and that at least in the USA, The Netherlands and Romania the first cases were detected among vaccinated people.

Why on earth do you think this is relevant? What matters is that the continued spread of Covid in any population increases the likelihood of new mutations and variants. Were everyone vaccinated, this risk would be mitigated. Hence, unvaccinated populations are a danger.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:28:07 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 07:30:05 AM
21 omicron cases in hospital, or a little above 1%. Of which 2/3 were hospitalized within 2 days of their positive test, corresponding to previous information about the disease behaving quicker generally.

.


Just to get clearer about this, do you know the age of the people who are in hospital, their vaccination status (did they have three jabs?), whether they were admitted because of covid or whether they were admitted for some other reason and covid was diagnosed incidentally, and whether they are saturating from room oxygen?

Sorry about this  -- I don't know if this slightly annoying reference is well known in Denmark

(https://c.tenor.com/9H6EkFYCga0AAAAC/inquisition-monty.gif)

(Bizarre how we've all had to become amateur epidemiologists to make sense of this covid malarkey. The newspapers here in the UK are dreadful -- basically unjustifiably frightening people because fear = readers. )
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 07:30:05 AM
21 omicron cases in hospital, or a little above 1%.

1% of diagnosed cases. The incidence is likely to be much more than 1840 people. Are there any statistical studies estimating omicron incidence in Denmark?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 11, 2021, 08:46:31 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 11, 2021, 05:57:59 AM
There also seems to be widespread acceptance of medical "scientists" and "scientific advisors" as if they were experts in fields of "hard science" such as physics or chemistry.



     Why should this round of disease require a new epistemology? The problems associated with vaccination for dangerous viruses have been around for centuries.

     Do you want to "devaccinate" your children because you don't widely accept whatever pisses you off? Will you put your kids lives on the line to demonstrate your contempt for the mainstream?

     You'll insist that biology isn't chemistry and therefore not hard science, right? The study of viruses and vaccines is wizardry. yes?

     I accept medical science as science and therefore fallible, just like other branches. Why wouldn't I? I don't need a new epistemology every time I go around the block.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 08:47:22 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:28:07 AM
Just to get clearer about this, do you know the age of the people who are in hospital, their vaccination status (did they have three jabs?), whether they were admitted because of covid or whether they were admitted for some other reason and covid was diagnosed incidentally, and whether they are saturating from room oxygen?

Sorry about this  -- I don't know if this slightly annoying reference is well known in Denmark

(https://c.tenor.com/9H6EkFYCga0AAAAC/inquisition-monty.gif)

(Bizarre how we've all had to become amateur epidemiologists to make sense of this covid malarkey. The newspapers here in the UK are dreadful -- basically unjustifiably frightening people because fear = readers. )

This is all very, very recent stuff, your press will probably be dealing with it too.

Their age and vaccine status isn't available in the concise, official little report I saw from today, cf. link below. Maybe they consider the age of the 21 hospitalized omicron cases as statistically too insignificant. Perhaps it also suggests a spreading in age groups, with no obvious tendencies. Recently, the focus here has been young, unvaccinated people suffering badly/fatally from Delta infections.

Good - by further study, beyond the press headlines I read initially - to see that the omicron increase was actually collected over several days, not just from yesterday.
https://files.ssi.dk/covid19/omikron/statusrapport/rapport-omikronvarianten-11122021-uy12
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 08:55:44 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:34:55 AM
1% of diagnosed cases. The incidence is likely to be much more than 1840 people. Are there any statistical studies estimating omicron incidence in Denmark?

Of course, but no total estimates yet. Almost 4% of the total population, 220,000, were tested just yesterday, and 5606 cases found totally. Later sewage sampling might give further information. But after all, as a layman, I'd doubt that the total number of infected is beyond 4-5x, of that number.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:58:41 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 08:55:44 AM
Of course, but no total estimates yet. Almost 4% of the total population, 220,000, were tested just yesterday, and 5606 cases found totally. Later sewage sampling might give further information. But after all, as a layman, I'd doubt that the total number of infected is beyond 4-5x, of that number.

In the UK there are people who are saying that omicron is a godsend if it is mild. Yes, it will cause major disruption to society this winter and spring - there will be a huge number of people off work and the hospitals will be at breaking point despite the mildness. I fear not only for health provision, but also for basic services like food and fuel, security and law and order. But there is real light at the end of the tunnel for the first time really because, if it is indeed mild, there will soon be herd immunity everywhere. Pandemic over.

The if it is mild bit is wishful thinking of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 11, 2021, 09:00:24 AM
Agree. General view here, that the 3rd jab is recommendable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 11, 2021, 10:10:13 AM
First the Holocaust, now the Inquisition. Poster child of the immaterial and inflammatory.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 11, 2021, 11:59:27 AM
And this was a dentist, for mercy's sake: Italian who tried to evade vaccine using prosthetic arm now claims he's received his shot (as yet unconfirmed)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 04:20:55 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 11, 2021, 08:46:31 AM
     Why should this round of disease require a new epistemology? The problems associated with vaccination for dangerous viruses have been around for centuries.

     Do you want to "devaccinate" your children because you don't widely accept whatever pisses you off? Will you put your kids lives on the line to demonstrate your contempt for the mainstream?

     You'll insist that biology isn't chemistry and therefore not hard science, right? The study of viruses and vaccines is wizardry. yes?

     I accept medical science as science and therefore fallible, just like other branches. Why wouldn't I? I don't need a new epistemology every time I go around the block.

I'd happily take well proven vaccines against hideous diseases such as polio, rabies, Ebola etc. but am not convinced the risk of COVID for me is greater than the risk of the hastily produced vaccines. The basic science of biology is fine but there's a worrying layer of interpretation and marketing added before it reaches the public which one doesn't find for example in the geology of Mars.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 04:22:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 11, 2021, 08:58:41 AM
But there is real light at the end of the tunnel for the first time really because, if it is indeed mild, there will soon be herd immunity everywhere. Pandemic over.

The if it is mild bit is wishful thinking of course.

We're hoping that's the case but the "authorities" here don't trust those South African doctors.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 12, 2021, 04:49:09 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 04:22:54 AM
We're hoping that's the case but the "authorities" here don't trust those South African doctors.

And the age and vaccination status in the UK is very different from SA -- so even if the SA medical system were giving a reliable picture, it couldn't be carried over to the UK.

I really came to this thread to express my disappointment about the vaccination passport system which is about to become law in the UK. This for a population with a very high rate of vaccination already, for vaccines which do not inhibit transmission of omicron very well as far as we know, and which do not prevent severe symptoms significantly until the third dose. And the opposition is supporting them. A diversionary tactic for the tories, a measure designed to please the groundlings so the opposition haven't got the balls to oppose  -- at best it will do no more harm than good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 05:05:45 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 12, 2021, 04:49:09 AM
I really came to this thread to express my disappointment about the vaccination passport system which is about to become law in the UK.

Fortunately we can live without going abroad, to restaurants, concerts etc. and can walk the dogs from the house if it comes to it. Hoping to just wait it all out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 12, 2021, 06:42:33 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 04:20:55 AM
I'd happily take well proven vaccines against hideous diseases such as polio, rabies, Ebola etc. but am not convinced the risk of COVID for me is greater than the risk of the hastily produced vaccines. The basic science of biology is fine but there's a worrying layer of interpretation and marketing added before it reaches the public which one doesn't find for example in the geology of Mars.

      When is this risk going to show up? A year ago the vaccines passed safety tests that didn't exist when the early polio vaccine was killing people. I got the Moderna shot in March, not because I didn't care about risk, but because I know how to weigh it. Critics of the mainstream consensus like to point out problems with news coverage largely based on other reports from different mainstream sources. That's as much a validation of how the news works as a critique of it. Why assume everyone is dumber than you? Many are, but not among the people you are talking to here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 12, 2021, 06:54:14 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 12, 2021, 04:20:55 AM
I'd happily take well proven vaccines against hideous diseases such as polio, rabies, Ebola etc. but am not convinced the risk of COVID for me is greater than the risk of the hastily produced vaccines. The basic science of biology is fine but there's a worrying layer of interpretation and marketing added before it reaches the public which one doesn't find for example in the geology of Mars.

Well, the test of the pudding is in the eating...

And whatever shortcuts were applied to rush the approval of the vaccines, to date 7,81 billion shots have been administered world wide. That is simple and irrefutable proof right there. Any safety scares at this stage, are irrational.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 12, 2021, 07:58:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 12, 2021, 06:42:33 AM
      When is this risk going to show up? A year ago the vaccines passed safety tests that didn't exist when the early polio vaccine was killing people. I got the Moderna shot in March, not because I didn't care about risk, but because I know how to weigh it. Critics of the mainstream consensus like to point out problems with news coverage largely based on other reports from different mainstream sources. That's as much a validation of how the news works as a critique of it. Why assume everyone is dumber than you? Many are, but not among the people you are talking to here.

Some of the same semi-Libertarian sources were, way back when, decrying the amount of testing the vaccines had to go through to be released, calling it an example of government slowing down innovation and public safety.

Narratives do change over time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 13, 2021, 08:00:58 AM
Without statewide mask mandate against COVID-19, health experts say Mass. will 'fight this war with one arm tied behind our backs'

By John Hilliard Globe Staff, updated December 12, 2021, 8:34 p.m.

As numbers of coronavirus cases climb in Massachusetts, a growing chorus of local, state, and federal officials is sounding the call for mask mandates in indoor public places to stanch the spread of the pandemic this winter.

The urging comes amid threats posed by the virus's Delta and Omicron variants, and as the weather grows colder, gatherings move indoors, and the holiday season approaches. The US Centers for Disease Control reported Sunday that every Massachusetts county faces high community transmission and recommends residents wear masks in indoor public settings.

Local health officials, including Julia Raifman, an assistant professor of health law, policy, and management at the Boston University School of Public Health, said Sunday that a statewide indoor mask rule would play an important role in limiting transmission of the virus.

"Massachusetts is a high-transmission setting with a COVID surge, and it is past time for Massachusetts to have an indoor mask policy to protect everyone," Raifman said in an e-mail.

State Representative William Driscoll Jr., who supports a statewide rule for face coverings, said he anticipates a discussion on changes to masking guidance, including mandates, during a legislative virtual hearing on the status of the pandemic scheduled for Thursday at 10 a.m.

Driscoll, who co-chairs the Legislature's Joint Committee on COVID-19 and Emergency Preparedness and Management, said Sunday he is already back to wearing well-fitting masks while he is in an indoor public setting and in large outdoor crowds.

Pointing to recent transmission rates and the pandemic's impact on local hospitals, Driscoll said individuals and the government must do more to slow the spread of COVID-19.

"The past two years have been exhausting and we all want to put the pandemic in the rear-view [mirror]," Driscoll said, "and in order to do that we need to have universal indoor mask wearing during surges and times of increased transmission like we are experiencing now."

Dr. Howard Koh, a former state health commissioner who is now a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health urged state lawmakers to push for a universal mask mandate.

"Not doing so leaves us continuing to fight this war with one arm tied behind our backs," Koh said in an e-mail Sunday. "We must deploy all available tools to put behind us a pandemic that has gone on far too long."

More than 83 percent of the state's population — about 5.7 million people — have received at least one dose of vaccine, and the numbers of daily vaccinations are rising following a steep drop-off in the spring.

But state pandemic data show some discouraging signs: The number of new daily cases, which have been climbing in recent weeks, are now at levels comparable to those reported at this time last year.

While state data on deaths have not recorded a similar spike, the daily number has climbed since September.

On Friday, the latest data available, the state reported about 5,000 new confirmed cases, along with 27 new deaths. More than 901,000 confirmed cases have been reported since the crisis began in 2020 and 19,217 people in Massachusetts have died from the virus.

In Massachusetts hospitals, the seven-day average number of coronavirus patients passed 1,100 as of last Thursday — more than double the number from a month earlier, according to state data.

Andrew Lover, an assistant professor at UMass Amherst's School of Public Health and Health Sciences, warned Sunday that the state's post-Thanksgiving increase in cases and hospitalizations will probably continue, or even increase, through the December holidays and into January.

"This very worrisome situation, plus the unknowns around Omicron, really suggests we need to do everything we can, including masking," Lover said in an e-mail. "That's hard news to hear for all of us after so many waves, but unfortunately that's the reality."

Masking up, along with vaccinations, was highlighted as important in the fight against COVID-19 Sunday by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House's top medical advisor.

In an ABC interview Sunday , Fauci said the nation has the tools to protect itself and urged people who are eligible for vaccinations or boosters to get shots. He also urged people to follow public health guidance on masking up.

"You know, masking is not going to be forever, but it can get us out of the very difficult situation we're in now," he said.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, former head of the US Food and Drug Administration, on "Face the Nation" Sunday also backed masking up in indoor public places. Gottlieb pointed to states like Massachusetts and New Hampshire where the health care systems are pressed due to rising cases from the dominant Delta variant.

"Mask mandates are the easiest thing we can do, the sort of collective action that puts some downward pressure on spread," Gottlieb said.

Massachusetts currently has a mask advisory in place for public indoor spaces and requires masking on public transit, and in settings like health care and congregate care facilities. The state also requires masking in public schools until Jan. 15, though schools can seek permission to lift the restriction if students and staff meet vaccination requirements.

Some communities, like Boston, Chelsea, and Brookline, have implemented masking rules for indoor public areas. And the Archdiocese of Boston said parishioners will have to wear face coverings in church beginning Saturday.

Governor Charlie Baker, who recently received his booster shot, has repeatedly urged residents to get vaccinations and boosters. Baker's office Sunday, in response to a request for comment, referred to an earlier statement by the governor.


"And as we continue to deal with new variants — in particular Omicron, which as we know is here — it's particularly important, especially important, for people to take care of themselves, and their families, and their friends, and neighbors by getting vaccinated," according to a transcript from his office.

On Sunday, Raifman said vaccines are very effective for reducing severe disease, but they are not enough to reduce surges. Several Massachusetts communities have many unvaccinated residents, leaving them highly vulnerable, she said.

She said the state has tools to control the virus but is not using them well.

"Inaction is a policy choice that makes society unpleasant for everyone and deadly for our least privileged," Raifman said.

Matthew Fox, an epidemiology and global health professor at Boston University School of Public Health, said Massachusetts is likely to avoid the worst due to the state's high vaccination rate. But he is concerned that the pandemic situation could worsen, given the holiday season.

"Individuals can wear masks on their own and this has some benefit. But unless we require this [for] everyone, the impact is limited," Fox said. "When collective action is needed, only the government can take effective action."

Looking ahead, William Hanage, a professor of epidemiology at Harvard's Chan School, said on Sunday he is concerned about the rise of the Omicron variant, which is likely to surpass the number of new Delta cases by the end of this month and produce large numbers of cases in January.

He was among health officials who urged vaccinations and booster shots. The vaccines are the best way people can protect themselves, including those who have already had COVID-19, he said.

But in addition, he said it was time for Massachusetts to impose a universal mask mandate.

"Past time," Hanage said. "Way past time."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 14, 2021, 04:45:26 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 12, 2021, 06:42:33 AM
When is this risk going to show up?

Good question, along with when will it become impossible to cover it up any more? Only time will tell. I didn't come here to argue as people are already committed to their decisions, but just to state my own point of view.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on December 14, 2021, 07:10:33 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 14, 2021, 04:45:26 AM
Good question, along with when will it become impossible to cover it up any more? Only time will tell. I didn't come here to argue as people are already committed to their decisions, but just to state my own point of view.

Are you suggesting that there are a large number of serious adverse reactions to the vaccines that are being covered up somehow?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 07:21:41 AM
One issue is long term undesirable consequences. Obviously no-one knows whether there are going to be any serious ones, but that's precisely the point. To say that, given your age, health and lifestyle, you'd prefer to take the risk of not being vaccinated than take the risk of long term effects, is not a point of view that can be easily criticised from the point of self interested rationality.

For me the interesting questions are to do with our vision of society, and the degrees of freedom available to our political leaders. Can we financially afford a society with a group who reasonably decline the vaccine, even though it may increase their immediate need for hospitalisation if they come down with a serious case of COVID? Do we morally want a society where people are constrained to vaccinate against their self-interested wishes, wishes which are not obviously irrational. 

I'm afraid there's no avoiding very complex and very fundamental questions. Our political leaders and their influencers are certainly not avoiding them, though they may prefer to encourage the populations they govern to think in simple populist and divisive terms, just as a means of social control.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2021, 07:38:02 AM
Court rejects religious challenge to New York's vaccine mandate for health care workers

By Amy Howe
on Dec 13, 2021 at 8:59 pm

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down two requests to block New York's vaccine mandate for health care workers. Two groups of health care workers are challenging the mandate, arguing that it violates their constitutional right to freely exercise their religion. But over the public dissents of three conservative justices, the court denied the workers' requests to put the mandate on hold while litigation continues.

The dispute centers on a regulation issued by New York's state health department that requires all health care workers in the state to be vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they qualify for a medical exemption. The regulation does not contain a religious exemption.

The challengers went to federal court, contending that they cannot comply without violating their religious beliefs because the three vaccines available in the United States all were tested or developed with cells descended from decades-old aborted fetal cells. One set of challengers told the justices that the vaccine mandate "imposes an unconscionable choice on New York healthcare workers: abandon their faith or lose their careers and their best means to provide for their families."

The use of historical fetal cell lines is routine in the development and testing of drugs and vaccines, and the COVID vaccines themselves do not contain aborted fetal cells. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other anti-abortion religious leaders have said it is ethically acceptable to receive the vaccines.

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit declined to freeze New York's mandate earlier this fall, the health care workers came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene on an emergency basis. The workers told the court that, like restrictions imposed on worship services to combat the spread of COVID-19, "vaccine mandates raise difficult questions about balancing indubitably strong public health interests on one side and core constitutional rights on the other." However, the workers continued, "it is not difficult to see that New York's uniquely punitive treatment of religious objectors, which is an extreme outlier nationally, violates the Free Exercise Clause." They complained that New York had originally included a religious exemption but then eliminated it while maintaining a medical exemption.

New York urged the justices to leave the mandate in place. It compared the COVID-19 vaccine requirement, with only a medical exemption, to "preexisting vaccination requirements for measles and rubella that have been in effect for decades." And the state pushed back against the premise of the health care workers' objection to the vaccine, telling the justices that Pope Francis and the Conference of Catholic Bishops have encouraged people to get vaccinated. Fetal cells used during the research and development phase of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, the state said, "are currently grown in a laboratory and are thousands of generations removed from cells collected from a fetus in 1973." Moreover, the state stressed, "the use of fetal cell lines for testing is common, including for the rubella vaccine, which New York's healthcare workers are already required to take."

Although both cases have been fully briefed since Nov. 17, the justices did not act on them until Monday, disposing of both with one-sentence orders. In October, the court rejected a similar challenge to Maine's vaccine mandate for health care workers who sought religious exemptions. In that case, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the court's emergency docket is not the proper place to resolve the merits of the challenge. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch dissented from the court's decision not to intervene in the Maine case, with Gorsuch writing a dissenting opinion.   

Gorsuch again issued a written opinion dissenting from Monday's order denying the New York challengers' emergency request in Dr. A v. Hochul. He would have put the mandate on hold until the Supreme Court can fully take up the challengers' case. Alito joined Gorsuch's dissent; Thomas indicated that he would have granted the challengers' application but did not join the Gorsuch dissent.

Gorsuch emphasized that the challengers "are not 'anti-vaxxers' who object to all vaccines" and that "no one questions the sincerity of their religious beliefs." The challengers' religious opposition to the vaccines, he continued, did not originally pose any problems, because former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo had indicated that any vaccine mandate would contain both medical and religious exceptions. "The trouble here began only" when Cuomo was replaced by the current governor, Kathy Hochul – who, Gorsuch noted, "expressed her view that religious objections to COVID-19 vaccines are theologically flawed."

Because there is no real dispute that the challengers are likely to be permanently harmed if the mandate remains in effect, Gorsuch reasoned, the real question before the court in deciding whether to grant emergency relief was whether the challengers are likely to succeed on their argument that the vaccine mandate violates their right to freely exercise their religion. "The answer to that question," Gorsuch wrote, "is clear," and the mandate is unconstitutional. In light of Hochul's comments about religion and vaccination, as well as changes to the state's unemployment system "designed to single out for special disfavor healthcare workers who failed to comply with the revised mandate," Gorsuch concluded, the overall record of New York's mandate "practically exudes suspicion of those who hold unpopular religious beliefs."

But even if the state had not made its suspicion so clear, Gorsuch added, the regulation would still be unconstitutional because "New York has presenting nothing to suggest that accommodating the religious objectors before us would make a meaningful difference to the protection of public health." Other states have not required religious objectors to receive the vaccine, Gorsuch observed, and New York itself already enjoys a high vaccination rate in its health care facilities.

Gorsuch closed by accusing the court of "stand[ing] silent as majorities invade the constitutional rights of the unpopular and unorthodox." Gorsuch expressed hope that eventually the justices will reach a different result that is, in his view, more respectful of the free exercise of religion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2021, 08:06:15 AM
Air Force discharges 27 service members in first apparent dismissals over vaccine refusal
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 14, 2021, 08:36:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 07:21:41 AM
Can we financially afford a society with a group who reasonably decline the vaccine, even though it may increase their immediate need for hospitalisation if they come down with a serious case of COVID?

Can we financially afford a society with 4.9 million diabetics though? What's really pushing the NHS to breaking point?

https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/diabetes-diagnoses-doubled-prevalence-2021 (https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/diabetes-diagnoses-doubled-prevalence-2021)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 08:40:13 AM



     World's First Big Omicron Study Suggests the New Variant Could Be Milder (https://www.thedailybeast.com/south-africa-omicron-study-suggests-the-new-variant-could-be-milder?ref=home)

First, the bad: Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech were found to offer 70 percent protection against hospitalization during the study's time period, and 33 percent protection against infection. That's way down from the 80 percent protection against infection and 90 percent efficacy against hospital admission during South Africa's outbreak of the Delta variant.

However, the study also showed that Omicron appears to cause less severe illness than earlier variants. The findings show that the risk of hospital admissions among adults who caught COVID in November and early December was 29 percent lower than it was in March 2020.


Quote from: fbjim on December 12, 2021, 07:58:43 AM
Some of the same semi-Libertarian sources were, way back when, decrying the amount of testing the vaccines had to go through to be released, calling it an example of government slowing down innovation and public safety.

Narratives do change over time.

     Wait, are you covering or uncovering? Which way is "up"?

     We should take hypothetical upcoverings in stride and get the fukin' jabs for the usual abductive reasons. Present information, flaws and all, is the best we have.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 08:43:42 AM
Quote from: krummholz on December 14, 2021, 07:10:33 AM
Are you suggesting that there are a large number of serious adverse reactions to the vaccines that are being covered up somehow?

     He's "just asking questions".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 08:54:54 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 08:40:13 AM

     Wait, are you covering or uncovering? Which way is "up"?

     We should take hypothetical upcoverings in stride and get the fukin' jabs for the usual abductive reasons. Present information, flaws and all, is the best we have.

   

I mean that prior to the narrative that vaccines were being pushed by the Liberal Elite, and that masks were purely for left-wing virtue-signaling, the narrative among the Greenwaldian crypto-Libertarians was more or less that the vaccine should bypass the burdensome regulatory process.

I trust pharmaceutical companies about as far as I can throw their headquarters building, and I'm fully aware of cases where they have explicitly made up fake diseases in order to sell medication*. But everything I can see tells me that the greatest interest for all parties involved, be it normal citizens, government workers, pharma companies, or whoever the "elite" are, is ending the pandemic as soon as possible. It makes far more sense that TPTB would far rather everyone go back to their happy lives of consumer spending than having everything be disrupted.



*this is unsurprisingly most common in the field of mental health, where a lack of testing rigor and the difficulty of diagnosing mental health problems creates large opportunities for this. probably most infamously the case of "Premenstrual dysphoric disorder" which was more or less made up as a separate category as standard depressive/anxious systems in order to retain the patent for Fluoxetine
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 14, 2021, 08:56:02 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 08:43:42 AM
     He's "just asking questions".

Fair enough. I can't cite any mainstream media or authorities so will leave you alone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 09:11:47 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 08:54:54 AM
I mean that prior to the narrative that vaccines were being pushed by the Liberal Elite, and that masks were purely for left-wing virtue-signaling, the narrative among the Greenwaldian crypto-Libertarians was more or less that the vaccine should bypass the burdensome regulatory process.

I trust pharmaceutical companies about as far as I can throw their headquarters building, and I'm fully aware of cases where they have explicitly made up fake diseases in order to sell medication*. But everything I can see tells me that the greatest interest for all parties involved, be it normal citizens, government workers, pharma companies, or whoever the "elite" are, is ending the pandemic as soon as possible. It makes far more sense that TPTB would far rather everyone go back to their happy lives of consumer spending than having everything be disrupted.



*this is unsurprisingly most common in the field of mental health, where a lack of testing rigor and the difficulty of diagnosing mental health problems creates large opportunities for this. probably most infamously the case of "Premenstrual dysphoric disorder" which was more or less made up as a separate category as standard depressive/anxious systems in order to retain the patent for Fluoxetine

     I don't think much is gained by assigning motives that are more nefarious or upcovered than the base level ones like seeking profits or preventing deaths and severe illness.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 09:22:57 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 14, 2021, 08:36:00 AM
Can we financially afford a society with 4.9 million diabetics though? What's really pushing the NHS to breaking point?

https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/diabetes-diagnoses-doubled-prevalence-2021 (https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/diabetes-diagnoses-doubled-prevalence-2021)

"NHS at breaking point" is a vague concept. In practice what it means is precisely this: media images of people taking their last gasp in a hospital car park because there was no available bed in a ward. Nothing else matters because only that will damage them politically.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 09:25:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 14, 2021, 09:11:47 AM
     I don't think much is gained by assigning motives that are more nefarious or upcovered than the base level ones like seeking profits or preventing deaths and severe illness.

   

By far the ones that make the least sense is that they want masks as a form of social control or something which: ???

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 09:44:24 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 09:25:43 AM
By far the ones that make the least sense is that they want masks as a form of social control or something which: ???

Nobody is saying that as far as I know. What people are saying is this: Masks mandates are a form of social control. If people accept them, they are accepting the imposition of a punitive system to control their behaviour, like they do with, for example, drink drive legislation.

Some people say that the mask mandates are not justifiable. Nobody as far as I know says that they are useless at stopping transmission. Some people are saying that they are, in practice, not very effective at stopping transmission. That the benefits are small, though not zero. Note the in practice.

Some people then go on to say that the benefits are so small and the mandates are so divisive that they can't be justified. And they then go on to ask why they're being imposed. There are some interesting answers to that rather deep question.

I'm sorry that this is more complex and nuanced than the populist line -- anyone who doesn't wear a mask is mad or bad or both. But that's how it is.

My own view is this: mask mandates are a distraction from more important, fundamental changes which need to be put into place to make covid endemic. Better health and safety in the work place and in education, better support for isolation, better non-hospital based social care to free up hospital beds to the critically ill.

But  our politicians don't want a lobby for these more fundamental changes to gain momentum. Far better to manage their media relations in a way which gets people hot and bothered about masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 09:47:21 AM
The "populist" line is that masks are liberal virtue signaling, and that wearing them is in itself a divisive act. In fact I've seen this argued explicitly in this thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 10:00:15 AM
It's something I wear because it's a fairly zero-effort measure, has reasonable intuitive evidence of working, given the uptake in countries with experience dealing with outbreaks such as Taiwan and Japan, and not to politically signal anything.


This is a symptom of the expansion of the culture war to affect everything. This is why someone screamed at me for being a liberal for riding a bicycle to the store, and attempted to kill me. Because nobody can just ride a bike to the store, it has to be smug liberal elitist condensation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 10:00:47 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 09:47:21 AM
The "populist" line is that masks are liberal virtue signaling, and that wearing them is in itself a divisive act. In fact I've seen this argued explicitly in this thread.

(I've just deleted a post because I've understood your point better.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 14, 2021, 10:02:15 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 10:00:15 AM
It's something I wear because it's a fairly zero-effort measure, has reasonable intuitive evidence of working, given the uptake in countries with experience dealing with outbreaks such as Taiwan and Japan, and not to politically signal anything.


This is a symptom of the expansion of the culture war to affect everything. This is why someone screamed at me for being a liberal for riding a bicycle to the store, and attempted to kill me. Because nobody can just ride a bike to the store, it has to be smug liberal elitist condensation.

I suspect you're seeing things in the USA which I'm not seeing in the UK yet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 14, 2021, 10:10:32 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 10:00:15 AM
(...)


This is a symptom of the expansion of the culture war to affect everything. This is why someone screamed at me for being a liberal for riding a bicycle to the store, and attempted to kill me. Because nobody can just ride a bike to the store, it has to be smug liberal elitist condensation.

Surreal, and not nice. But if you collect a series of stuff like that, a fiction/documentary script, added a good deal of black humour, would become a success for sure, at least abroad, due to the rare degree of absurdity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 10:12:52 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 14, 2021, 10:10:32 AM
Surreal, and not nice. But if you collect a series of stuff like that, a fiction/documentary script, added a good deal of black humour, would become a success for sure, at least abroad, due to the rare degree of absurdity.

I've only had it happen to me once, but many of my friends have had this happen. One reason is the lack of consequences - I'm not joking when I say that by far the easiest way to murder someone in the United States is to run them over with a car and claim you didn't see them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 14, 2021, 10:34:50 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 14, 2021, 10:12:52 AM
I've only had it happen to me once, but many of my friends have had this happen. One reason is the lack of consequences - I'm not joking when I say that by far the easiest way to murder someone in the United States is to run them over with a car and claim you didn't see them.

Well, at the very least it's hard to imagine such plot-makers not to have an awful lot of problems, that probably tend to pile up further, as time goes by.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2021, 01:33:17 PM
Omicron variant could peak in U.S. as soon as January, health officials warn (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/12/14/omicron-us-spread/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 14, 2021, 01:40:50 PM
Mass. reports 11,431 new breakthrough COVID-19 cases, raising total to 2 percent of fully vaccinated people — 4:44 p.m.

By Amanda Kaufman, Globe Staff

Massachusetts on Tuesday reported 11,431 more COVID-19 cases among fully vaccinated people since last week, bringing the total since the beginning of the vaccination campaign to 100,399 cases, or 2.02 percent of all fully vaccinated people.

The Department of Public Health also reported 52 more COVID-19 deaths among fully vaccinated people, bringing the total to 699 deaths among those fully vaccinated. The number of breakthrough deaths represents a tiny fraction of all vaccinated people and underscores the protection the vaccines provide against severe illness and death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 06:41:07 AM
Princeton, Cornell move finals online as Omicron is detected
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2021, 07:59:34 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 15, 2021, 06:41:07 AM
Princeton, Cornell move finals online as Omicron is detected
I read yesterday that almost 500 people had tested positive at Cornell for Covid.  Whoops!  *Bad memory here!  Make that over 900.  Mind you, in terms of percentages, they have over 25,000 students there at the Ithaca campus.  Still, that's horrible news!  :(

*or I might have read a story before they updated their numbers on Tuesday

Cornell University reported 903 cases of Covid-19 among students between December 7-13, and a "very high percentage" of them are Omicron variant cases in fully vaccinated individuals, according to university officials.

More here.... https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/cornell-university-covid-cases/index.html

How bad are Princeton's numbers Karl?

PD

EDIT:   NYU is also moving their finals online.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 08:10:24 AM
Haven't found numbers, PD

Separately:

'State of the Spread' in Rhode Island shows dangerously overcrowded hospitals and Omicron variant worries — 11:19 a.m.

By Brian Amaral, Globe Staff

Internal briefing materials shared with Rhode Island health and political leaders present a stark picture of overcrowded hospitals, with potentially worse to come if the Omicron variant of COVID-19 spreads more easily than previous variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2021, 08:23:47 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 15, 2021, 08:10:24 AM
Haven't found numbers, PD

Separately:

'State of the Spread' in Rhode Island shows dangerously overcrowded hospitals and Omicron variant worries — 11:19 a.m.

By Brian Amaral, Globe Staff

Internal briefing materials shared with Rhode Island health and political leaders present a stark picture of overcrowded hospitals, with potentially worse to come if the Omicron variant of COVID-19 spreads more easily than previous variants.
I found this on their website:

34 positive out of 18,934 tests done between December 4 - 10th.  https://covid.princeton.edu/dashboard

I've heard very similar news regarding Arizona (re hospitals) lately too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 08:35:57 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2021, 08:23:47 AM
I found this on their website:

34 positive out of 18,934 tests done between December 4 - 10th.  https://covid.princeton.edu/dashboard


That's  0.17 %.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 08:41:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2021, 07:59:34 AM
More here.... https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/14/us/cornell-university-covid-cases/index.html

"Virtually every case of the Omicron variant to date has been found in fully vaccinated students, a portion of whom had also received a booster shot," said Vice President for University Relations Joel Malina in a statement.

An anti-science conspiracy theorist this Malina guy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 15, 2021, 08:43:16 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 08:35:57 AM
That's  0.17 %.
And roughly 3.6% then for Cornell.  I wonder what the numbers were for Cornell the previous week.  As in how quickly is it spreading?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 09:20:38 AM
The UK has been warned to expect a lot of people to get ill all at the same time over the next few weeks. This will make it impossible to provide basic services smoothly - education, public transport, health, law and order, distribution of essential items like food and medications and so on. We are being urged to do as we did in 1939: viz


(https://cdn.postgradproblems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/6e331632c3e94462d4b04ed4dc38727f.jpg)

I'm not sure I fully understand the Government's thinking behind this painful strategy, but a clue came this morning when Jenny Harries, who runs the UK Health Security Agency, suggested to Parliament that she expected that cases would peak around the new year, presumably because the virus would run out of fuel, as it were. The number of susceptible people will decrease due to acquired or vaccine induced omicron immunity.

What this suggests to me is that the UK strategy is to develop population wide herd immunity by letting omicron do its worst. They clearly think that there is enough play in the system to do that, given a high booster take up.


It is a huge gamble! Not only on the leeway in the health system and the effectiveness of the vaccines, but also on the social consequences of a huge wave of illness in the country.

And I keep thinking: when will the winter flu epidemic start? ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 09:46:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 09:20:38 AM
The UK has been warned to expect a lot of people to get ill all at the same time over the next few weeks. This will make it impossible to provide basic services smoothly - education, public transport, health, law and order, distribution of essential items like food and medications and so on.

Who has issued this fear-mongering, panic-inducing warning? The government? The experts? The press? All of them and then some?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 10:01:02 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 09:46:21 AM
Who has issued this fear-mongering, panic-inducing warning? The government? The experts? The press? All of them and then some?

Yes, The government and the experts.  Can you watch this in Romania?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLS7i1R1fBI&ab_channel=10DowningStreet
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 10:13:39 AM
But, of course, everybody dies anyway ...

Omicron spreading rapidly in U.S. and could bring punishing wave as soon as January, CDC warns

By Lena H. Sun, Joel Achenbach, Laurie McGinley and Tyler Pager

Yesterday at 3:08 p.m. EST| Updated yesterday at 8:02 p.m. EST

Top federal health officials warned in a briefing Tuesday morning that the omicron variant is rapidly spreading in the United States and could peak in a massive wave of infections as soon as January, according to new modeling analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The prevalence of omicron jumped sevenfold in a single week [emphasis mine—kh], according to the CDC, and at such a pace, the highly mutated variant of the coronavirus could ratchet up pressure on a health system already strained in many places as the delta variant continues its own surge.

The warning of an imminent surge came even as federal officials and some pharmaceutical executives signaled that they don't currently favor creating an omicron-specific vaccine. Based on the data so far, they say that existing vaccines plus a booster shot are an effective weapon against omicron.

The CDC briefing Tuesday detailed two scenarios for how the omicron variant may spread through the country. The worst-case scenario has spooked top health officials, who fear that a fresh wave, layered on top of delta and influenza cases in what one described as "a triple whammy," could overwhelm health systems and devastate communities, particularly those with low vaccination rates.

"I'm a lot more alarmed. I'm worried," said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer for the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, who participated in the call. The CDC, normally cautious in its messaging, told the public health officials that "we got to get people ready for this," he said.

He noted that the omicron surge, if it materializes as forecast, would be taking place as delta continues its onslaught and during the time of year when influenza cases often peak.

Officials stress that early data shows that individuals who are fully vaccinated and received a booster shot remain largely protected against severe illness and death from omicron [emphasis mine—kh]. But they worry about how few Americans have been boosted to date. Over 55 million people in the United States have gotten the additional shots, out of 200 million who are fully vaccinated, according to the CDC.

The newest modeling scenarios have been shared among senior administration officials as they discuss politically fraught decisions about how, when and whether to take new steps to suppress the virus and keep hospitals from being overwhelmed.

The second scenario outlines a smaller omicron surge in the spring. It's unclear which scenario is more likely. The modeling was done by experts tapped by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky in August to deliver real-time outbreak forecasting and analytics. The experts work with other teams inside and outside the government.

"They're considering the information at the highest levels right now, and thinking through how to get the public to understand what the scenarios mean," said one federal health official familiar with the briefing. "It looks daunting."

"The implications of a big wave in January that could swamp hospitals ... we need to take that potential seriously," said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss policy deliberations.

Late Tuesday, after this story was published online, the CDC released a statement saying the morning discussion was part of a regularly scheduled meeting, hosted by the agency, with leaders of four public health organizations. "As we are preparing for a range of scenarios with the Omicron variant, a portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussion around results from various modeling groups related to Omicron—no CDC, HHS or U.S. Government models were presented," the statement said.

The CDC's analysis is consistent with that of several academic groups in the United States and with data from the United Kingdom, Denmark and Norway. New restrictions have already been imposed in the United Kingdom and other countries in Europe that were seeded with omicron earlier.

The Biden administration's strategy relies heavily on vaccination and testing. When President Biden announced his "action plan" on Dec. 2 for fighting the virus this winter, he noted "it doesn't include shutdowns or lockdowns but widespread vaccinations and boosters and testing and a lot more."

A reformulated vaccine that's omicron-specific is not currently planned as part of that toolbox, said senior administration health officials and experts at vaccine companies, adding there is no evidence a vaccine design switch is necessary.

They cited data that suggests the original vaccines, coupled with a booster shot, provide protection against severe illness caused by omicron. So far, they noted, the vaccines have successfully countered every variant. That view could change in the next two weeks as more data comes in involving laboratory tests and the spread of omicron.

Switching the vaccines has sweeping implications. If they are changed too early, that limits the ability to deal with another variant down the road — one that might be more dangerous than omicron.

"We have to be careful not to repeat mistakes of the past," said one administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk about the issue. "If there is a change needed, we want to make it, but we don't want to end up making a change if we don't really need it. It costs time, money and effort."

Experts say it's impossible to keep changing the vaccines or giving different boosters because there is not enough manufacturing capacity and other resources.

Anthony S. Fauci, Biden's chief medical adviser on the coronavirus response, said in an interview Monday that "there isn't any compelling reason right now to drop everything and make an omicron-specific vaccine, as opposed to continue to administer vaccine for people who are unvaccinated and boosting people who are vaccinated."

Speaking Tuesday in an interview on NBC's "Today" show, Walensky, the CDC director, said that while omicron "is more transmissible ... I want to emphasize that we have the tools now" to keep Americans safe.

The signs of omicron's transmissibility in this country are mounting: From Dec. 4 to Dec. 11, the variant likely jumped from a mere 0.4 percent of new infections in the U.S. to 2.9 percent, according to the new CDC data. In New York and New Jersey, omicron already accounts for 13 percent of new cases, Walensky said.

In the Houston Methodist hospital system, omicron accounted for 13 percent of new cases in a four-day period leading up to Dec. 8, according to James Musser, chair of pathology and genomic medicine. He expects that percentage to approach 20 percent when new numbers are published Wednesday. The omicron variant was first detected in Houston on Nov. 29.

Musser said his hospital system is ready for whatever comes next: "We've had 21 months of this now, and we're sort of — I hate to say it, because it's tragic — but we're sort of skilled in the art of how to handle this."

Though the delta variant remains dominant in the United States and is the driver of the recent surge in hospitalizations, particularly in the Upper Midwest and Mountain West, omicron continues to show signs that it is dramatically more transmissible. Importantly, it has dozens of mutations that make it a more slippery foe when encountered by neutralizing antibodies, the immune system's first line of defense.

That was reinforced Tuesday with the release of a large study from researchers in South Africa, the country that first warned the world of the emergence of the new variant in late November. The new study confirms that vaccines are significantly less effective at preventing infections with omicron but still usually prevent severe disease. The study also found that the people infected with omicron so far have had a 29 percent lower chance of being hospitalized than those infected with the virus that was circulating in South Africa in March 2020.

Infectious-disease experts caution that what happens in South Africa, which has a relatively young population, may not be repeated in Northern Hemisphere countries with older populations.

The CDC modelers also based their forecasts in part on data coming out of Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom, said Plescia, with Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Looking at the Norway data, the modelers said cases there could reach 300,000 quickly, "and there's not that many people in Norway," he added.

Scott Becker, chief executive of the Association of Public Health Laboratories, who was also on the call Tuesday, said it was "really important for the public health community to understand the early signals because it's all about preparedness and readiness."

Public health officials think there is adequate supply of personal protective equipment in the United States to protect against another wave. But the country is not ready with sufficient testing capability. States will need to work with their hospital systems to get them ready to expand capacity, Plescia and others said.

"The hope is that it is going to be less severe, but the concern is that the numbers could be so great, even if proportionally less people have to be hospitalized, the numbers are much higher and a lot of people are going to be really sick and overwhelm things," Plescia said.

The messaging to the public will be even more difficult. Two things that would help enormously — less travel during Christmas and more consistent wearing of masks — are not likely to happen, because people are so tired of the pandemic and have tuned out many public health messages [emphasis mine, and they get tuned out quicker and more thoroughly in states with large Evangelical populations—kh], he added.

Fauci said Friday that modeling data could portend a lifting of travel bans against countries in southern Africa, where omicron was first detected three weeks ago, should the analysis show the bans make no difference at this point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 10:25:45 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 10:01:02 AM
Yes, The government and the experts.  Can you watch this in Romania?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLS7i1R1fBI&ab_channel=10DowningStreet

I can and I will try to watch the whole thing tomorrow --- provided I'll be able to stand BoJo talking for such a large amount of time.

As a first comment before even watching it, I must say the UK government and experts make much more apocalyptic predictions than the Romanian ones, and the latter (I mean, not that much the Romanian government as the Romanian experts*) are famous for their apocalyptical tone.

* many of whom are no experts at all, it's the mainstream media that present them as such without the slightest check on their credentials; for instance, would you trust the predictions of a guy who is presented as "physician and researcher" yet it turns out he has never ever treated one single patient in his whole life because he, albeit a graduated from a Medical School, is not licensed to practice medicine and the only place where he published his research on Covid-19 is his Facebook account? Me neither, yet every few days this "exoert" appears on mainstream TV channels. And there are many more like him, actually.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 10:42:10 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 10:25:45 AM
I can and I will try to watch the whole thing tomorrow --- provided I'll be able to stand BoJo talking for such a large amount of time.

As a first comment before even watching it, I must say the UK government and experts make much more apocalyptic predictions than the Romanian ones, and the latter (I mean, not that much the Romanian government

Skip Boris and Listen to Whitty. I don't follow what's happening in Romania but I listen to the French news often, and there the tone is less doom laden than here. I'll be most interested to know what's happening in Dk -- who are ahead of the rest of the EU in the omicron game, and possibly ahead of the UK.

Whitty is rather good I think -- a safe pair of hands.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 10:52:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 10:42:10 AM
Skip Boris and Listen to Whitty. [...]

Whitty is rather good I think -- a safe pair of hands.

I'll watch the whole thing tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 10:56:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 10:42:10 AM
I'll be most interested to know what's happening in Dk -- who are ahead of the rest of the EU in the omicron game, and possibly ahead of the UK.

I'd say that South Africa is ahead of all other countries in the omicron game --- and they are quite relaxed about it. I have close relatives living there so I know what I'm talking about.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 11:12:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 10:56:13 AM
I'd say that South Africa is ahead of all other countries in the omicron game --- and they are quite relaxed about it. I have close relatives living there so I know what I'm talking about.

The UK line is:

1. Hospitalisations are increasing rapidly now in SA, as omicron begins to effect older cohorts there.
2. What they experience with omicron in SA may be much lighter than what they experienced with delta, because the community has more immunity now due to the delta wave. Omicron may be milder, it may not, it is too early to say.
3. Even if it is milder, it will still cause serious disruption -- to society generally (including hospital staff)  and to hospital requirements in particular. A lot of people will get ill in a small space of time, and even though only a small fraction of them will need to go to hospital, a small fraction of a large number is a large number.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 11:22:53 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 11:12:05 AM
Even if it is milder, it will still cause serious disruption -- to society generally (including hospital staff)  and to hospital requirements in particular. A lot of people will get ill in a small space of time, and even though only a small fraction of them will need to go to hospital, a small fraction of a large number is a large number.

Did the UK government make public the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations over which the UK public healthcare system will collapse?

Has the UK public healthcare system at any point in time since March 2020 collapsed or been on the verge of collapsing?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 11:25:57 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 11:12:05 AM
What they experience with omicron in SA may be much lighter than what they experienced with delta, because the community has more immunity now due to the delta wave.

Cognitive dissonance alert! The only difference between SA and UK in this respect is that the UK rate of vaccination is much higher.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 11:31:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 11:25:57 AM
Cognitive dissonance alert! The only difference between SA and UK in this respect is that the UK rate of vaccination is much higher.

Yes, assuming that vaccination acquired immunity is no more or less good at combatting omicron than immunity acquired by infection -- i.e. that immunity acquired through infection is not more polyclonal.

But the point is simply this. The people in SA are saying "this is less serious than delta was for us." And they're right, and it's exactly what you'd expect given the increased virus acquired immunity in the population. It may not be because omicron is milder than delta, rather it may be because the population has become more resistant. Too early to say. And until we can say, the UK cannot use the SA experience to predict that omicron for us will be milder than delta was.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 11:31:18 AM
The people in SA are saying "this is less serious than delta was for us." And they're right, and it's exactly what you'd expect given the increased virus acquired immunity in the population. It may not be because omicron is milder than delta, rather than because the population has become more resistant.

What is different in the UK, and why?

Look, according to a study of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the one European country featuring the highest rate of natural immunity against Covid-19 (ie, people who have had the disease and recovered) is Romania, at about 70%. I don't know how they calculated that exact percentage which seems exaggerated to me, but I tend to agree with the gist of their argument  --- all my anecdotical evidence, including the closest family members, points in that direction.

Take my own case. I've been officially tested positive with Covid-19 in early March 2021 (very mild symptoms) and I strongly suspect I've already had it in early March 2020 (many severe symptoms --- I even told my wife that that was the worst flu I've ever experienced, and mind you, at the time both she and my son had also bad flu, which we all got from the hospital where my father-in-law was hospitalized). I am absolutely not concerned about getting it again --- actually, I even strongly suspect I might have got it again recently, and recovered without ever needing any treatment.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 12:00:02 PM
Darn those "virtue-signalers"!

R.I. Governor McKee authorizes a mask mandate for venues of 250 or more — 1:50 p.m.

By Alexa Gagosz, Globe Staff

In a long-anticipated announcement, Governor Dan McKee said Wednesday that Rhode Island will only have a universal mask mandate for venues of assembly and businesses with a capacity of 250 people or more.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:05:39 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 15, 2021, 12:00:02 PM
R.I. Governor McKee authorizes a mask mandate for venues of 250 or more — 1:50 p.m.

By Alexa Gagosz, Globe Staff

In a long-anticipated announcement, Governor Dan McKee said Wednesday that Rhode Island will only have a universal mask mandate for venues of assembly and businesses with a capacity of 250 people or more.

Which begs the question: is the virus afraid of 249 people and will infect only 250 or more of them?  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 12:06:36 PM
By Kay Lazar, Felice J. Freyer and Julia Carlin:
Some infectious disease experts say mandates alone may not be enough to convince a pandemic-weary public to don face coverings once again. John Brownstein, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School and chief innovation officer at Boston Children's Hospital, concluded in a study published earlier this year that communities with high reported rates of mask wearing and physical distancing were able to better tamp down transmission of the virus — but government mandates did not seem to boost the number of people wearing masks.

"The mandate itself is not necessarily the most effective," Brownstein said. "What we have found, generally speaking, is that [mask wearing] goes up when there is a threat other than a government mandate."

He said a surging number of cases and rising hospitalizations post-Thanksgiving, coupled with so many unknowns about the rapidly spreading Omicron variant, are just as likely to convince people to put their masks back on.

And the latest data from Carnegie Mellon University's COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey appears to agree with that assessment. It shows that the percentage of Massachusetts residents who report wearing a mask climbed to 67 percent earlier this week, from 61 percent just before Thanksgiving.

Ali H. Mokdad, professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, said there is no doubt that masks "can control the spread of this virus."[emphasis mine—kh]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:13:02 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 15, 2021, 12:06:36 PM
Ali H. Mokdad, professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, said there is no doubt that masks "can control the spread of this virus."[emphasis mine—kh]

Wearing a mask is the least liberticide measure I can think of --- I never oppoosed it, not least on the ground that surgeons wear it daily for hours without any bad effects. Heck, right now that I'm typing wearing a mask outdoor is not mandatory in Romania yet in 99% of cases I wear a mask outdoor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 12:32:37 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 11:57:39 AM
What is different in the UK, and why?

Look, according to a study of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the one European country featuring the highest rate of natural immunity against Covid-19 (ie, people who have had the disease and recovered) is Romania, at about 70%. I don't know how they calculated that exact percentage which seems exaggerated to me, but I tend to agree with the gist of their argument  --- all my anecdotical evidence, including the closest family members, points in that direction.

Take my own case. I've been officially tested positive with Covid-19 in early March 2021 (very mild symptoms) and I strongly suspect I've already had it in early March 2020 (many severe symptoms --- I even told my wife that that was the worst flu I've ever experienced, and mind you, at the time both she and my son had also bad flu, which we all got from the hospital where my father-in-law was hospitalized). I am absolutely not concerned about getting it again --- actually, I even strongly suspect I might have got it again recently, and recovered without ever needing any treatment.

The problem is that the doubling time is very fast - 2 days here - and so the predictable spike of infections is very large and steep. That means not only that all the breakthrough cases needing oxygen are going to come at once. It also means that all those people who can't go to work because they feel crap will all come at once, as will the people isolating because they're a positive contact. The former is a problem about finding hospital beds, the latter is a problem about filling the shelves in the markets, running the trains, sending a policeman to the scene of a crime, putting a teacher in front of the kids at school etc etc

But yes, for a vaccinated individual the risk is low. And a public spirited individual may want to take extra precautions - take a test before going to parties, work from home if possible, that sort of thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:43:46 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 12:32:37 PM
The problem is that the doubling time is very fast - 2 days here - and so the predictable spike of infections is very large and steep.

I asked it before, I ask it again: did the UK government stated which is the number of infections that will make the UK public healthcare system collapse?


Quoteall the breakthrough cases needing oxygen

Their estimated number being...?

Quoteall those people who can't go to work because they feel crap will all come at once.

I felt crap each and every morning after a drinking binge. I went to work each and every morning I felt crap.

My point: feeling crap is not a specific Covis-19 symptom.

Quotefilling the shelves in the markets, running the trains, sending a policeman to the scene of a crime, putting a teacher in front of the kids at school etc etc

These are going to be serious problems if and only if vaccination will be mandatory --- ie, if and only if the society will go totalitarian in a degree which Communism, Nazism and Fascism never were.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:49:48 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 15, 2021, 12:32:37 PM
for a vaccinated individual the risk is low.

What risk? Certainly not the infection and transmission risk.


Quotea public spirited individual may want to take extra precautions - take a test before going to parties,

On December 12 I threw a party for my birthday --- neither did I take a test, nor did I request a test for my guests, which were all vaccinated --- I guess I'm not a public spirited individual and neither are my guests.


Quotework from home if possible

If you ask me, that's the best thing that came out of this bloody mess.

EDIT --- My honest advice to you is this: listen less to mainstream media news and more to Chopin's music.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on December 15, 2021, 02:50:04 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:13:02 PM
Wearing a mask is the least liberticide measure I can think of --- I never oppoosed it, not least on the ground that surgeons wear it daily for hours without any bad effects. Heck, right now that I'm typing wearing a mask outdoor is not mandatory in Romania yet in 99% of cases I wear a mask outdoor.
Same here. IMO the people that complain about masks (for public places, not talking about 8+ hours a day at work, different type of complaint there) are being somewhat petty, and it doesn't help that they tend to be also concerned about the same types of things actually worth having concerns about. Can tend to obfuscate other people's points because of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 03:38:20 PM
Quote from: krummholz on December 14, 2021, 07:10:33 AM
Are you suggesting that there are a large number of serious adverse reactions to the vaccines that are being covered up somehow?

Hope he isn't. the number certainly is not large.

CDC advisers to weigh limits on Johnson & Johnson vaccine because of continued rare blood clot issues

New data appears to show the rate has increased since April, although the problem remains rare. About nine deaths related to the issue have also been reported.

By Lena H. Sun and Laurie McGinley Today at 7:00 p.m. EST

Vaccine advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are meeting Thursday to weigh possible limits on the use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine because of continued blood clot issues, mostly in young and middle-aged women, according to clinicians familiar with the agenda.

The single-dose vaccine has been linked to a rare and severe type of blood clot, which halted its use for 10 days in April as federal health officials looked more closely at six women who experienced the problem — the only known cases among more than 7 million people who received the vaccine in the United States at that time. One of the women died. The pause was lifted after an extensive safety review that determined the vaccine's benefits outweighed the risks.

On Thursday, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will be presented with new data that appears to show the rate of the clots in people who received the Johnson & Johnson shot has increased since April, although the problem is still rare. There have been about nine deaths related to the issue, according to a federal official familiar with the situation.

The FDA, in an update to its fact sheet on the vaccine this week, said the highest reporting rate of clot issues — about one case per 100,000 doses administered — has been in women 30 to 49 years old.

A comprehensive review of the blood clot condition following vaccinations between last December and Aug. 31 found six deaths among 50 confirmed cases of the blood clot condition among recipients of the one-shot regimen. During that period, 14 million doses of the vaccine were given, according to the study published last month, which has not yet been peer-reviewed.

The panel is "certainly going to get some updates between the [April] pause and now — how many more cases are there [now] compared to before, and are there certain populations that may be at increased risk, based on age, gender and comorbidities," said one clinician familiar with the agenda, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.

After reviewing the data, it is expected to vote on whether to update its recommendation for the vaccine's use, according to the meeting agenda. The options include leaving the current recommendation to administer it to anyone 18 or older, "get rid of it, or only use it in certain populations," the clinician said.

Another option, according to a federal official familiar with the situation, would be to recommend the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines over the Johnson & Johnson product, making what is known as a preferential recommendation.

Any changes in the vaccine's use would likely apply to both the initial single shots and boosters, said a second clinician knowledgeable about Thursday's meeting.

Such a recommendation would have to be endorsed by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky to become an official recommendation of the agency.

On Monday, the CDC sent emails to state health departments asking them to "describe the predicted impacted [sic] to your jurisdiction's COVID-19 vaccination program if Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] were no longer recommended, or were recommended only for a subset of the population," according to a copy of the email shared with The Washington Post.

Regulators believe the benefits of the vaccine outweigh its risks, according to the FDA's updated fact sheet. At its discussion in April just before lifting the pause, the CDC's vaccine advisory panel took the same position, but there was debate about whether to add additional warnings targeted to women under 50. That was not done, although the FDA and the CDC added language to fact sheets and guidance for physicians to make women younger than 50 aware of the rare risk and the availability of other coronavirus vaccines.

Jake Sargent, a spokesman for Johnson & Johnson, said the company has updated its fact sheet to include the latest information from the FDA about the rare condition. "We are committed to understanding and communicating all known risks, including rare events of [the blood clot condition], and strongly support raising awareness of the signs and symptoms of this rare event," he said in an email.

Since April, more studies have also shown that the two-shot Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which use the mRNA technology, have higher effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations than the Johnson & Johnson product. However they are more difficult to use for certain groups that are less likely to return for a second shot.

By far the greatest number of vaccine doses administered in the United States have been the Pfizer and Moderna products, totaling about 468 million doses, according to the CDC. About 17 million doses of Johnson & Johnson have been given.

State health officials have said the one-shot vaccine, which doesn't require ultracold storage like the Pfizer product, is useful for vaccinating hard-to-reach communities, including migrant workers, homeless shelters, the homebound and others with limited access to health care. In some areas, where there are incentives to be fully vaccinated, getting one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine meets that definition.

Still, a recommendation to limit its use or make it less preferred is not likely to have a huge practical impact because "we have ample mRNA vaccines available to us," the second clinician said.

In conversations with patients who have received the Johnson & Johnson product, the clinician already urges those eligible for boosters to get either the Pfizer or Moderna shots because data shows greater protection if the booster uses a different technology than the original regimen.[interesting—kh]

The federal official said that if the advisers determine the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is a "less preferential vaccine," it would also send a signal about its use outside the United States. The vaccine is authorized for use in 90 countries, according to the World Health Organization. "That could be a problem because saying that means we are making a comment for the U.S. population, which means we should not be exporting" the vaccine, the official said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 15, 2021, 04:10:07 PM
How One Country Stopped COVID Dead in Its Tracks

Japan has a death rate of around 5 percent of the carnage in the U.S. thanks to massive vaccine rollout success and the universal acceptance that masks are a good idea.

David Axe Updated Dec. 15, 2021 10:45AM ET

COVID cases are on the rise all over the world. The onset of winter in the northern hemisphere, the rapid spread of the new and more transmissible Omicron variant, and the stubbornness of the previous variant, Delta, have all contributed to a surge in infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in many countries.

But not in Japan. In Japan, COVID has all but disappeared. And it's mostly clear why.

"It always comes down to vaccines, to social restrictions [on] large gatherings, mask-wearing," Dale Fisher, group chief of medicine at Singapore's National University Health System, told The Daily Beast. "There's no secret code that any country has discovered."

While many countries including the United States struggle against a stubborn minority of fervent anti-vaxxers, Japan has quietly vaccinated 80 percent of its 126 million people. That's nearly everyone who's over 5 years old and thus eligible.

In a lot of countries, mask mandates are deeply controversial. But not in Japan, where many people habitually wore masks in public even before the pandemic.

When SARS-CoV-2 first came to Japan, the country suffered like every other country did, scrambling to contain the virus through a combination of business and school closures, mask mandates, contact-tracing, quarantines, and travel bans.

More than 18,000 Japanese have died. That's 14 out of every 100,000 people in the country, compared to 127 out of 100,000 in Germany and a staggering 242 out of 100,000 in the U.S.

Once vaccines were widely available starting this spring, however, Japan showed the world that it's special, if not quite unique. There are a few other countries that are as highly vaxxed as Japan is—Singapore and Israel, to name a couple. But even those two countries are registering a lot more new cases than Japan is right now. Last week, authorities in Tokyo reported just 113 new infections a day on average. Israeli officials reported 615 cases a day in a population of 9 million people. Singapore, with fewer than 6 million people, reported 645 a day.

The U.S., by the way, is back up to 120,000 new infections a day as COVID rips through the 40 percent of the population that has refused to get vaccinated or, in the case of kids under 5, isn't eligible yet.

Japan is beating COVID primarily by steadily vaccinating everyone. Remarkably, it did so without really mandating jabs anywhere. "Vaccines will never be administered without the recipient's consent," Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida vowed on his official website. "We urge the public never to coerce vaccinations at the workplace or upon others around them, and never to treat those who have not received the vaccine in a discriminatory manner."

That lack of coercion didn't seem to matter. It took just five months for almost all eligible Japanese to get jabbed.

That community-mindedness is equally apparent when it comes to masks, which experts stress are still key tools for preventing the virus's spread even where good vaccines are free and readily available. When it comes to masks, in Japan "there's just an acceptance," Fisher explained. "It does reflect on the society."

But even widespread vaxxing and masking don't totally explain Japan's success suppressing the virus, Taro Yamamoto, chairman of the Department of International Health at the Institute of Tropical Medicine at Nagasaki University, told The Daily Beast. "It's not clear at this point what other factors are involved," Yamamoto said.

The Japanese government has adopted sound COVID policies and the Japanese people, demonstrating what to Americans might seem like an unusual degree of trust in their leaders and each other, have gone right along. Plus, the country appears to just be... lucky. "I don't believe Japan has a secret formula," Fisher said.

If there's a caveat, it's that one of the most stringent policies—on-again, off-again bans on travel to Japan—isn't really helping. Japan was all but inaccessible to non-resident foreigners for two years. Tokyo was just about to start relaxing the travel ban when Omicron first appeared. Now Japan remains closed to most outsiders.

But two years into a global pandemic, where the virus has already found its way into every region of every country, border-closings simply don't work any more, Fisher said. "Travel restrictions are a false sense of security."

Pointless travel ban aside, it looks like Japan is winning its war on COVID. But experts warn that could change. There are worrying signs that the new Omicron variant makes the standard, two-dose regimen of the messenger-RNA vaccines less effective.

A third shot—a booster—should help. But compared to other rich countries, Japan has been slow to offer boosters to the general population. The government authorized health-care workers to get boosted starting Dec. 1. That was an obvious first step, as health workers are at elevated risk—and since many workers in the health-care industry were first in line to get vaccinated and thus might, by now, be losing some of their vaccine-induced antibodies.

The government wants people to wait until eight months after their prime immunizations to get boosted, meaning everyday people who don't work in health care aren't yet eligible. After all, widespread vaccination didn't get underway in Japan until early summer.

But Omicron won't wait. Tokyo knows it needs to speed up booster eligibility, but hasn't yet come up with a plan. "We are hoping to determine the effect of the existing vaccines on the Omicron strain as soon as possible, and then show the scope and method of moving up booster shots," Kishida told legislators last week.

Even if the government immediately authorizes everyone to get boosted, Japan will still be behind many other countries as far as third shots are concerned. The U.S. for all its scattershot approach to COVID at least has moved quickly on boosters. The U.S. Food and Drug administration has authorized everyone 16 and older to get a third shot. A quarter of Americans are already boosted.

Japanese officials have tallied just a dozen or so Omicron cases in the country. But the variant may yet become dominant in Japan. And if Omicron takes over before large numbers of residents can get their boosters, the variant's potential to evade prime vaccination could leave Japan vulnerable.

"We are just at the beginning of winter so it is quite possible that they will see a surge in January [to] February," Paul Ananth, president of the Asia Pacific Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection in Singapore, told The Daily Beast.

As far as COVID is concerned, Japan has done almost everything right. But that could change as the pandemic enters its third year and Japan, as well as the rest of the world, tries to keep up with an evolving virus and achieve some form of population-level "herd" immunity, where viral transmission is all but impossible.

"SARS-COV2 mutates quickly, and like the flu, there will always be viruses that escape immunity," Yamamoto said. "The acquisition of herd immunity will be established after immunity to some mutant strains has been acquired. It will take a year or two."

A year or two is plenty of time for something to go wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on December 15, 2021, 09:45:56 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 02:58:14 PM
Let's get straight to the point, shall we?

In my not so humble, very informed opinion, anyone who is in favor of mandatory vaccination is in favor of a totalitarian society --- one that not even the Communists, Nazis and Fascists dared to enforce.
Well, unintentionally, maybe. It's along the lines of trading freedom for "safety." Kind of a parallel to countries where people want a strong leader to fight off the bad guys- and they will comply however needed to do so. A leader only gets their power from supporters, after all.
It's sort of like a test for the general population. Be submissive and scared and the government will know it can treat its people however it wants to. Protest enough and in the future the government might at the very least hesitate with any unfair treatment, since the message is sent that the culture of its people isn't a culture of pushovers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 15, 2021, 10:54:34 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:49:48 PM


EDIT --- My honest advice to you is this: listen less to mainstream media news and more to Chopin's music.

The best advice I've seen on this thread! If you must have the facts then go to the Covid19 data websites that nearly all governments run and make up your own mind rather than have some media person who hasn't do it for you. The statistics might surprise you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 15, 2021, 11:07:52 PM
Quote from: Holden on December 15, 2021, 10:54:34 PM
The best advice I've seen on this thread! If you must have the facts then go to the Covid19 data websites that nearly all governments run and make up your own mind rather than have some media person who hasn't do it for you. The statistics might surprise you.

But...but...but...

These same governments are " in favor of a totalitarian society --- one that not even the Communists, Nazis and Fascists dared to enforce."


ffs
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 01:32:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 15, 2021, 12:49:48 PM
What risk? Certainly not the infection and transmission risk.




Here in London it's pretty well certain that everyone will catch omicron over the next very few weeks -- hermits apart.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 16, 2021, 04:20:02 AM
With 9999 found cases today here in DK, another new record, current restrictions are unsatisfactory, and a new set will be introduced soon, maybe tomorrow. Life is generally quite normal, except mask wearing, a curfew in nightlife around midnight, the closure of schools, and a bit more.

Another initiative being carried through is the 3rd jab campaign, a big task hoping to include 3.5 mio people within just a few weeks. I'm able to keep a low profile socially, until my 3rd jab is supposed to work, after the next week-end. There won't be mandatory vaccines here.

Concerning Omicron, sources are not clear yet, but even if it is somewhat milder, the growth in cases will likely mean straining the hospitals further. But the 3rd jab does tend to reduce the seriousness of the disease. Also, treatment options are generally way better than in 2020.

Here, about 10% of the population has been registered as having had the disease; the real number must be higher, of course. But there hasn't been excess mortality. A big Chinese survey now states that 2 of 5 don't experience symptoms at all.

A bit strange that mostly UK, South Africa and DK seem very hit, officially, by Omicron so far - results from other countries should now be ticking in, in spite of any local slowness in sequencing, I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 05:48:11 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 01:32:38 AM
Here in London it's pretty well certain that everyone will catch omicron over the next very few weeks -- hermits apart.

Everyone? I doubt it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 05:54:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 05:48:11 AM
Everyone? I doubt it.

Well yes, I think so, unless some sort of very serious lockdown is put into place, everyone. It's doubling every too days; the vaccines do not prevent people catching it so the whole population is susceptible;  it seems very transmissible so you don't need a big dose to get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 05:59:31 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 05:54:51 AM
Well yes, I think so, unless some sort of very serious lockdown is put into place, everyone. It's doubling every too days; the vaccines do not prevent people catching it so the whole population is susceptible;  it seems very transmissible so you don't need a big dose to get it.

Actually, how many infections have been recorded in London until today?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:10:06 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 05:59:31 AM
Actually, how many infections have been recorded in London until today?

Yesterday there were 20K positive test results and over half of all cases are omicron we're told. Let's be generous and assume that the number of cases is 2x the number of positive tests - more. So that's 20K omicrons a day. The hard part of making a model is that the proportion of omicron cases is growing rapidly - delta is being ousted. And - and this is the real interesting thing - there may be a reduction in R as cases grow because people become more cautious, we're already seeing parties being cancelled, the restaurant industry is up in arms asking for support from the government.

Pop London about 7M I think. It won't take long to get to 7M if it continues to grow like it is. Just think - 20K, 40K, 80K, 150k, 300K, 600K, 1M, 2M, 4M  - that's nine doubling periods, 18 days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:15:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:10:06 AM
Yesterday there were 20K positive test results and over half of all cases are omicron we're told. Let's be generous and assume that the number of cases is 2x the number of positive tests - more. So that's 20K omicrons a day. The hard part of making a model is that the proportion of omicron cases is growing rapidly - delta is being ousted. And - and this is the real interesting thing - there may be a reduction in R as cases grow because people become more cautious, we're already seeing parties being cancelled, the restaurant industry is up in arms asking for support from the government.

Pop London about 7M I think. It won't take long to get to 7M if it continues to grow like it is.

Thanks. And how many hospitalisations?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:30:11 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:15:00 AM
Thanks. And how many hospitalisations?

Omicron hospitalisations in London? I don't know, not many. But clearly if the function from prevalence to hospitalisation is like delta, or even half as bad as delta, it's a problem because they all come at once!

Add to the equation my biggest fear - the 2022 flu epidemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:38:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:30:11 AM
Omicron hospitalisations in London? I don't know, not many. But clearly if the function from prevalence to hospitalisation is like delta, or even half as bad as delta, it's a problem because they all come at once!

What is the maximum number of hospitalisations that the London hospitals can afford?

QuoteAdd to the equation my biggest fear - the 2022 flu epidemic.

Why are you more scared by flu than by omicron?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:45:04 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:38:04 AM
What is the maximum number of hospitalisations that the London hospitals can afford?


I don't know. The answer is complicated by the fact that the hospital staff will be catching omicron and getting too ill to go to work.

Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:38:04 AM

Why are you more scared by flu than by omicron?

If the flu epidemic is bad that will be a major burden on the hospital system in itself, coming at precisely the time when the system is having to deal with omicron. The flu epidemic here is typically Jan/Feb I think.

There's another aspect to all this. The people who won't receive support over the next three months because they're not an emergency. The people who are in the first stages of a cancer or a life effecting chronic disease, the people crippled by skeletal problems, the accident victims etc.  They will add to an already large backlog, a long long waiting list to see a hospital doctor. That is one of the major long term challenges of this whole pandemic I think, and it will need a political solution. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:59:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 06:45:04 AM
I don't know. The answer is complicated by the fact that the hospital staff will be catching omicron and getting too ill to go to work.

If the flu epidemic is bad that will be a major burden on the hospital system in itself, coming at precisely the time when the system is having to deal with omicron. The flu epidemic here is typically Jan/Feb I think.

What was the situation in this respect in Jan 2020 / Feb 2021? Was there a shortage of doctors due to catching Covid themselves? Did the flu add to the hopitalisation burden?

QuoteThere's another aspect to all this. The people who won't receive support over the next three months because they're not an emergency. The people who are in the first stages of a cancer or a life effecting chronic disease, the people crippled by skeletal problems, the accident victims etc.  They will add to an already large backlog, a long long waiting list to see a hospital doctor. That is one of the major long term challenges of this whole pandemic I think, and it will need a political solution.

And that solution is...?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:12:26 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 15, 2021, 10:54:34 PM
If you must have the facts then go to the Covid19 data websites that nearly all governments run and make up your own mind rather than have some media person who hasn't do it for you.

LOL yes your government will know the full facts and is only interested in your well being, or your TV may offer a fact checking service or panel of authorities to answer your questions like the BBC does, along with heart rending stories from people whose loved ones fell prey to the evil conspiracy theorists on social media and lost their minds. They've panicked the majority here anyway, saying they're not stopping anyone going anywhere but people really ought to think very carefully before they take such an enormous risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 07:41:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:59:37 AM
What was the situation in this respect in Jan 2020 / Feb 2021? Was there a shortage of doctors due to catching Covid themselves? Did the flu add to the hopitalisation burden?


No, there was no flu epidemic in 2021 because everyone was isolating.

Quote from: Florestan on December 16, 2021, 06:59:37 AM
And that solution is...?

I don't know. What is happening at the moment in the UK is that lockdown measures are being avoided despite the omicron growth, and they're doing this because of the financial cost of lockdown and the belief that the health system will be able to offer beds to all the covid victims who need one. That means that they can avoid the political consequences of people taking their last gasp in a hospital car park because there was no room inside, and no staff to help them.

The political flack from all the extra cancer deaths, and all the suffering caused by long waiting lists, is none existent at the moment.  So the cost of the backlog is being discounted completely.

So one solution would involve a lock down. But obviously that would have in itself very undesirable consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:45:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 07:41:38 AM
No, there was no flu epidemic in 2021 because everyone was isolating.

The official line was "COVID displaced the flu" like the flu took a year off. It can't have been due to isolation as flu spreads very easily and people still managed to catch COVID.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 07:47:37 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:45:23 AM
The official line was "COVID displaced the flu" like the flu took a year off. It can't have been due to isolation as flu spreads very easily and people still managed to catch COVID.

Can you give me a link to that? I don't understand it. NB that the number of new covid cases in 2020 was declining very rapidly at precisely the time you would have expected a flu epidemic, because the country was in a long and very hard lockdown.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:54:02 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 16, 2021, 07:47:37 AM
Can you give me a link to that? I don't understand it.

I don't understand it either but a search found this from the NIH who I expect most people will consider an authority.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33207254/ (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33207254/)

"The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 was associated with substantial reductions in the circulation of seasonal respiratory viruses".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 07:56:54 AM
Omicron surges around the world as South Africa's daily cases surpass delta peak

Regeneron says its coronavirus antibody cocktail loses potency against omicron
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 16, 2021, 09:18:06 AM
At a presser here in DK, authorities said that new restrictions + continued vaccine programs were absolutely necessary to avoid an omicron-caused breakdown in the health sector, and potentially other sectors in society as well.

Also, that it will be difficult for people not to catch the virus within the next few months; the 3rd jab is now officially mainly to soften oncoming illness experiences.

New restrictions presented tomorrow.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 09:48:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 16, 2021, 09:18:06 AM
At a presser here in DK, authorities said that new restrictions + continued vaccine programs were absolutely necessary to avoid an omicron-caused breakdown in the health sector, and potentially other sectors in society as well.

Also, that it will be difficult for people not to catch the virus within the next few months; the 3rd jab is now officially mainly to soften oncoming illness experiences.

New restrictions presented tomorrow.



Good luck! Warm thoughts!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 11:40:01 AM
Meanwhile, down in the Death Cult Belt:

Omicron is dominant strain in wastewater samples around Disney World — 12:43 p.m.
By The Associated Press

Even though there have been practically no cases of clinical infection, wastewater samples show that the new omicron variant is now the dominant strain of COVID-19 in the Florida county that is home to the nation's largest theme park resorts, officials said this week.

The omicron variant has quickly surpassed the delta variant in collections taken from wastewater sampling sites in Orange County, officials said.

A sampling this week showed that omicron represented almost 100% of the strains in the samples from the wastewater facilities, Orange County Utilities spokesperson Sarah Lux said in an email.

It's a different story when it comes to people seeking treatment for COVID-19, officials said.

"Those who are hospitalized are being primarily infected by the delta variant," Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings said Wednesday at a news conference held at the Orlando International Airport.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 12:10:32 PM
Hospital group boss cites 'terrifying increase' in COVID-19 patients in Mass.

By Travis Andersen Globe Staff, Updated December 16, 2021, 12:44 p.m.

The head of an influential hospital trade group on Thursday told a legislative committee that there's been a "terrifying increase" in COVID-19 patients in Massachusetts hospitals over the past month, as medical facilities deal with staffing shortages and a crunch on available beds.

"As of Tuesday there were 1,411 patients hospitalized with COVID-19″ statewide, said Steve Walsh, president and chief executive officer of the Massachusetts Health & Hospital Association, in remote testimony before the Legislature's Joint Committee on COVID-19 and Emergency Preparedness. "A month ago there were 550."

The more than two-fold spike, Walsh continued, is "a terrifying increase" in patients. He said hospitals had anticipated an uptick around Thanksgiving.

"But it was more than we thought," Walsh said. "And if that trend continues after the New Year, we're going to have increasing problems. And you throw in any type of a mass casualty event, or a bad flu season, and it's literally going to be difficult for us to meet the demands of our communities."

Asked about the recent loss of some 500 ICU and medical beds across the state - prompting the Baker administration to advise hospitals cut certain non-essential, elective procedures by half - Walsh said Massachusetts hospitals are preparing for all possible contingencies.

"As of this point, we have always been able to find that ICU bed" when necessary, Walsh said, adding that preparations "are always taking place. At this point we are not looking at implementing crisis standards of care and hope it never comes to that."

Official statistics posted Thursday to the Mass. DPH website said there were 1,411 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Massachusetts, including 326 patients in ICUs, 176 of whom were on ventilators. The site's data is updated weekdays by 5 p.m.

The current tally of hospitalized COVID patients is roughly double what it was on Sept. 14, when 706 patients were in the hospital, according to DPH data. In late June, the seven-day average for hospitalized patients was just 98.3, the data says.

Lawmakers also heard Thursday from Dr. Nahid Bhadelia, founding director of Boston University's Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy and Research, who spoke to the critical need of housing security amid the pandemic.

"In the context of Omicron, what will happen to people who can't stay in their homes?" Bhadelia said. "They will end up having to go to congregate housing, which will be overcrowded. Which will then ... increase the risk of potential transmission."

Omicron is the highly transmissible variant that's been confirmed in COVID-19 patients in Boston and in Middlesex County, prompting many communities to re-implement some form of a mask mandate.

"The reason why the Omicron variant created a substantial global concern, is because of its sequence," said Dr. Dan H. Barouch, a Harvard Medical School professor and director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, during testimony before the committee.

"Because the Omicron sequence has a substantial number of mutations," Barouch said. "In the spike protein itself, about 30 mutations - much more than Delta. ... So, the Omicron variant not only has a lot of mutations, but it has a lot of mutations that are right where antibodies bind, which raise the suspicion that it might be able to evade antibodies."

Public health officials, meanwhile, continue to urge residents to get fully vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19. People are considered fully vaccinated after two jabs of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, or the single-shot Johnson & Johnson. They become eligible for a boost six months after their second Pfizer or Moderna shot, or two months after receiving the Johnson & Johnson jab.

In a separate development on the vaccine front, the Boston Black COVID-19 Coalition in a statement blasted the Baker administration for what the advocacy group said was the misguided decision to have Fenway Park start offering booster shots to people, beginning in January.

The group contends situating the booster site at Fenway will limit accessibility to communities of color.

"The same administration took heat back in January, after waxing on at daily Covid press briefings that Black/Latino communities, the most vulnerable and hardest hit by COVID, would get priority attention and access to vaccines when they become available," the statement said. "He then announced that first site would be GILETTE STADIUM and FENWAY PARK would soon follow as the second. No one should have been surprised when according to their early stats, 96% of those accessing the first round of vaccines at Fenway, were white."

A request for comment was sent Thursday afternoon to a spokesman for the Baker administration.

The Baker administration says on its website that the state's COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Initiative works with "the populations and communities most heavily impacted by COVID-19, with a focus on the 20 hardest-hit cities and towns. The goal is to reduce barriers to COVID vaccination, increase awareness of the vaccine's safety and efficacy and, ultimately, increase vaccinations."

The administration announced in June that it had awarded $3.2 million in grants and contracts to community-based organizations as part of the initiative, in an effort to increase awareness and access to vaccines in the 20 hardest hit cities and towns.

The administration said at the time that seven new nonprofits had been awarded $2.2 million to support vaccine navigation services and customized vaccine administration, building on $6.8 million previously awarded to 25 other groups.

But the Boston Black COVID-19 Coalition said Thursday that more must be done.

"Today, BBCC, had to cancel 2 more vaccine clinics scheduled at senior developments in Roxbury, due to the lack of clinicians and vaccine availability in the neighborhoods of [Roxbury/Dorchester/Mattapan] where, in fact, the need is so critical," said coalition member Dianne Wilkerson, a former state senator, in the group's release.

"As the City of Boston, moves to implement tougher policies regarding masking and vaccine card requirements, it is incumbent upon government to make sure that the access to vaccine and testing in Roxbury, Dorchester, Mattapan, and Hyde Park is convenient, equitable and available!"

Wilkerson added that at this moment, "it is not and it makes no sense to, once again, to site a mass vaccination site in Fenway Park, when the greatest demand and documented need is on the other side of town."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 16, 2021, 12:18:29 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:12:26 AM
LOL yes your government will know the full facts and is only interested in your well being, or your TV may offer a fact checking service or panel of authorities to answer your questions like the BBC does, along with heart rending stories from people whose loved ones fell prey to the evil conspiracy theorists on social media and lost their minds. They've panicked the majority here anyway, saying they're not stopping anyone going anywhere but people really ought to think very carefully before they take such an enormous risk.

The Qld Govt Health website has it's own Covid web pages where the only thing that is published is pure raw data on a daily basis. What you initially read is what happened the day before. Then there are links where there is far more data, some of it historical. If I want (which I do) I can see what is happening on a 'trending basis' and then make up my own mind as to what is happening in my state. Currently, as of midday yesterday there are 7 new cases in the state, all but one of which was contracted in MIQ. There are currently 28 people in hospital and none in ICU. It is these last two that will be of most interest, giving me a chance to get an idea of the severity of the new strain. It's too early to make a call at this stage.

One factor that you will see on the website is the results of wastewater testing which at the moment is done on a weekly basis. If it's in your wastewater then someone in your area has covid. The government can use this to predict areas where a possible outbreak will occur.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 12:21:35 PM
With Omicron in 'full force,' NYC to hand out masks, tests — 4:10 p.m.
By The Associated Press

Alarmed by a rapid rise in COVID-19 cases and the increasing prevalence of the omicron variant, New York City officials will distribute one million masks and 500,000 home tests, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Thursday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 16, 2021, 02:05:21 PM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:45:23 AM
The official line was "COVID displaced the flu" like the flu took a year off. It can't have been due to isolation as flu spreads very easily and people still managed to catch COVID.

What you can conclude is, that COVID spreads more easily than flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 16, 2021, 05:01:22 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 16, 2021, 02:05:21 PM
What you can conclude is, that COVID spreads more easily than flu.
:-X

That's what I have heard. Flu is contracted through direct contact of another person's droplets (yecch). Covid can be contracted through aerosols, which disperse more freely in the air. If someone goes out for a smoke and you can smell him from 6 feet you can also inhale his covid fumes...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 16, 2021, 06:38:09 PM
Quote from: André on December 16, 2021, 05:01:22 PM
:-X

That's what I have heard. Flu is contracted through direct contact of another person's droplets (yecch). Covid can be contracted through aerosols, which disperse more freely in the air. If someone goes out for a smoke and you can smell him from 6 feet you can also inhale his covid fumes...

Some disinformers would still have you believe that "COVID is just like the flu."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 16, 2021, 11:56:40 PM
Quote from: André on December 16, 2021, 05:01:22 PM
:-X

That's what I have heard. Flu is contracted through direct contact of another person's droplets (yecch). Covid can be contracted through aerosols, which disperse more freely in the air. If someone goes out for a smoke and you can smell him from 6 feet you can also inhale his covid fumes...

Can we please check our facts before posting suppositions. Yes, physical contact with flu droplets such as shaking someone's hand is a well known transmission method but it's not the only one. Aerosol transmission of influenza is a fact as this scholarly (and probably peer reviewed) article shows.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682679/

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 17, 2021, 12:07:41 AM
What I'm going to post highlights the disinformation and fearmongering by our media. The child concerned has already been classified as a Covid19 death, despite that fact that there is no autopsy at this point. The fact that he wasn't diagnosed until he had died strongly suggests that he displayed no Covid19 symptoms. The article also hints that other deaths, where the person has had Covid, does not necessarily mean that it was the virus that killed them. It's the headline that is deliberately misleading that concerns me. Lucy Xia, you should have your arse kicked for this piece of scurrilous press.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300481147/covid19-child-under-10-becomes-youngest-case-to-die
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on December 17, 2021, 03:29:59 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on December 16, 2021, 07:45:23 AM
The official line was "COVID displaced the flu" like the flu took a year off. It can't have been due to isolation as flu spreads very easily and people still managed to catch COVID.

The original covid-19 virus was 10 times more contagious than the flu. The delta variant was said to be 4 times more contagious than the original covid-19 virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 17, 2021, 05:41:58 AM
An old friend of mine, early on in the pandemic, said to me, "coronavirus has been around, read your Listerine bottle," entirely missing the adjective novel in the phrase novel coronavirus ... probably my first direct experience of a misguided amateur epidemiologist in the COVID-19 epoch. My friend is not actually dull-witted, but he is a Trump supporter, and his head is clearly planted in the right-wing disinformation ecosystem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on December 17, 2021, 06:53:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 17, 2021, 05:41:58 AM
An old friend of mine, early on in the pandemic, said to me, "coronavirus has been around, read your Listerine bottle," entirely missing the adjective novel in the phrase novel coronavirus ... probably my first direct experience of a misguided amateur epidemiologist in the COVID-19 epoch. My friend is not actually dull-witted, but he is a Trump supporter, and his head is clearly planted in the right-wing disinformation ecosystem.

I'm sure I was exposed to a multitude of coronaviruses during my decades of teaching. My wishful thinking hopes that gives me some stronger protection against COVID-19. I believe the scientific jury is undecided on that one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 17, 2021, 07:01:43 AM
Is it the cold, the flu or covid? What to know amid rapid spread of omicron
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/10/13/worst-cold-ever-covid-flu-season/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 17, 2021, 07:05:01 AM
Study finds no evidence Omicron cases are less severe than Delta
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Irons on December 17, 2021, 08:03:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 17, 2021, 07:05:01 AM
Study finds no evidence Omicron cases are less severe than Delta

In that case we are going to hell in a handcart. A perfect storm with Omicron being highly transmissible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus threadr
Post by: Mandryka on December 17, 2021, 08:29:56 AM
Quote from: Irons on December 17, 2021, 08:03:36 AM
In that case we are going to hell in a handcart. A perfect storm with Omicron being highly transmissible.

Not necessarily. It all depends how much headroom there is in the health system, how well other basic service provision can stand up to all the inevitable absences, how many people can be immunised with vaccines, and crucially how the public will behave - self motivated caution is already clicking in. The public's behaviour will determine the doubling time.

But I think this much is true whatever happens - the next couple of months will probably be a challenge the likes of which I've never seen before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 17, 2021, 09:24:59 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 17, 2021, 07:05:01 AM
Study finds no evidence Omicron cases are less severe than Delta

Any study which involves Neil Ferguson should be taken with a grain of salt.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/professor-lockdown-modeler-resigns-in-disgrace/ (https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/professor-lockdown-modeler-resigns-in-disgrace/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 17, 2021, 11:10:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 17, 2021, 07:05:01 AM
Study finds no evidence Omicron cases are less severe than Delta

By Naomi Kresge Bloomberg,Updated December 17, 2021, 9:10 a.m.

A previous COVID-19 recovery provides little shield against infection with the Omicron variant, a research team from Imperial College London showed in a large study that underlines the importance of booster shots.

Having had COVID probably only offers 19% protection against Omicron, the study showed on Friday. That was roughly in line with two doses of vaccine, which the team estimated were as much as 20% effective against Omicron. Adding a booster dose helped dramatically, blocking an estimated 55% to 80% of symptomatic cases.

The Imperial College London team analyzed all the PCR test-confirmed COVID cases in England between Nov. 29 and Dec. 11, making it one of the most expansive examinations yet at Omicron's potential to evade the body's defenses. The results were in line with the picture emerging of the variant's capacity to elude protection from previous infection or inoculation and spread faster than previous iterations of the virus.

There was no evidence of Omicron cases being less severe than Delta, based on the proportion of people testing positive who had symptoms or went to the hospital, the team said.

Just how severe Omicron cases will be remains unclear. It's too soon to say how hospitalizations will play out in the UK. In South Africa, which announced the discovery of the variant on Nov. 25, authorities said on Friday the rate of hospitalizations seems to be lower than during the country's earlier wave of Delta infections.

Europe is bracing for an Omicron-driven fifth wave of infections even as intensive-care units in many areas remain filled with patients sick with the Delta variant. Some governments are already imposing new measures in an effort to slow the Omicron wave and buy time for booster campaigns to gear up.

The proportion of Omicron among all COVID cases was probably doubling every two days up to Dec. 11, the UK team said, estimating that every person infected with the variant passed it on to more than three other people.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 17, 2021, 11:20:55 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 17, 2021, 12:07:41 AM
What I'm going to post highlights the disinformation and fearmongering by our media. The child concerned has already been classified as a Covid19 death, despite that fact that there is no autopsy at this point. The fact that he wasn't diagnosed until he had died strongly suggests that he displayed no Covid19 symptoms. The article also hints that other deaths, where the person has had Covid, does not necessarily mean that it was the virus that killed them. It's the headline that is deliberately misleading that concerns me. Lucy Xia, you should have your arse kicked for this piece of scurrilous press.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300481147/covid19-child-under-10-becomes-youngest-case-to-die

The article wasn't slandering anyone nor doing so with low language, so I don't know where you,re getting "scurrilous " from.

And the other day you were praising Stuff for printing an article you thought fearless and of rare honesty. So which one is it? (Actually it's neither - its completely bland and light).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 17, 2021, 11:57:10 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 17, 2021, 11:20:55 AM
The article wasn't slandering anyone nor doing so with low language, so I don't know where you,re getting "scurrilous " from.

And the other day you were praising Stuff for printing an article you thought fearless and of rare honesty. So which one is it? (Actually it's neither - its completely bland and light).

It's not necessarily Stuff, it's the individual reporter though who is responsible for the headline, rhe author or the editor? I praised Stuff the other day because they actually produced a decent piece of journalism for once. It didn't take long for them to revert to type. I should have used deceitful instead of scurrilous.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 18, 2021, 01:39:44 AM
The Netherlands is probably heading for a "full lockdown" (full shutdown except for essential services), after an expert committee has adviced to do so. Govt announcement later today. Earlier it was already decided that schools will close a week ahead of the Christmas holidays.

Omicron is spreading like wildfire and the hope is to slow it down.
According to the Dutch CDC (RIVM) the indications from the UK are that previous vaccines will offer insufficient protection against Omicron, with the exception of a "booster". Their position is that there are no indications that Omicron variant is either less or more harmful than the Delta variant. But because of the (relative) ineffectiveness of existing vaccines, Omicron presents an immediate thread.

What isn't helpful is that the Netherlands is behind with its booster programme...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 06:21:18 AM
The CEO of Southwest Airlines testified masks don't do 'much' on planes. He's since been diagnosed with COVID. — 9:38 a.m.
By Shannon Larson, Globe Staff

Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly tested positive for the coronavirus, the airline confirmed on Friday, just days after appearing at a Senate hearing where he and another airline leader questioned whether passengers needed to wear masks on planes.

US has over-counted the number of partly vaccinated Americans, state officials warn — 8:50 a.m.
By Bloomberg

The US government has over-counted the number of Americans who are at least partly vaccinated against the coronavirus, state officials warn, meaning millions more people are unprotected as the pandemic's winter surge gathers steam.

Omicron and holidays unleash scramble for coronavirus tests across the US — 8:40 a.m.
By The Washington Post

Coronavirus testing was a breeze when J.D. Schroeder traveled to Abu Dhabi and Mexico this fall. Not so much at home in Pennsylvania when he felt sick Wednesday and found out he had been exposed.

UK considers new COVID measures as hospitalizations rise — 6:32 a.m.
By Bloomberg

The UK is considering a two-week ban on people in England gathering indoors after Christmas to slow the Omicron variant's spread, the Times reported, citing people it didn't identify.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson hasn't approved the plan, and advisers are waiting for more data about the new strain, the newspaper said. Johnson wants to review the impact of measures imposed over the past week, and may see no need to tighten rules further.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 06:55:11 AM
Christmas and New Year's Eve is traditionally a time of the year when lots of Romanians come home from abroad where they live to spend the holidays with their family and friends. Romanian authorities thought it would be a good idea if this year upon their airport arrival they be officially checked for vaccination status and their whereabouts during their stay be officially registered so as to be easily traceable just in case anything goes wrong. The result, for 24 hours a day and several days in a row, has been this:

(https://cdn.g4media.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/agloneratie-otopeni-2-e1639147515837.jpg)

Now you tell me two things: (1) if one single person in that picture is infected, what should we expect in two weeks time? and (2) how can such a government be trusted they do their best to protect our health?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 07:01:40 AM
We Know Enough About Omicron to Know That We're in Trouble

More data will soon be coming in. But how much do they really matter?

By Sarah Zhang

Updated at 12:00 p.m. ET on December 17, 2021

A lot has changed for Omicron in just two weeks. At December's onset, the variant was barely present in Europe, showing up in 1 to 2 percent of COVID cases. Now it's accounting for 72 percent of new cases in London, where everybody seems to know somebody with COVID. In the U.K. and Denmark, Omicron case numbers are doubling every other day. The same exponential growth is happening—or will happen—in the United States too, just in time for the holidays.

What seemed likely earlier this month is now quite certain: A big Omicron wave is coming, on top of an already substantial Delta wave. There are still some unknowns about the variant, such as exactly how severe these cases will be. But we know enough about Omicron to understand that the time to act is now. "If we wait until our hospitals look like they're starting to fill," says Lauren Ancel Meyers, the director of the UT COVID-19 Modeling Consortium, "then it will be too late."

The most intriguing unknown—the one in which we might like to place our hopes—is whether Omicron could be milder than Delta. But a milder, more transmissible virus can easily sicken so many people that it ends up increasing hospitalizations and deaths on the whole. Here is some simple math to explain the danger: Suppose we have two viruses, one that is twice as transmissible as the other. (For the record, Omicron is currently three to five times as transmissible as Delta in the U.K.—though that number is likely to fall over time.) And suppose it takes five days between a person's getting infected and their infecting others. After 30 days, the more transmissible virus is now causing 26, or 64, times as many new cases as the less transmissible one. Exponentials are one hell of a growth hack. If we are banking on the idea that Omicron is more mild to get us through winter, then we had better hope that it's really, really mild.

Vaccines will lower the proportion of hospitalizations quite a bit in those extra cases, especially because Omicron is infecting lots of vaccinated people. But it's a long climb down that exponential curve. Moreover, when so many cases pile up all at once, their effects start spilling over into the lives of those who aren't sick. If Omicron runs through a workplace it may present a temporary inconvenience. But if that workplace is a school, then the school will have to close, disrupting the lives of every child and parent. If that workplace is a hospital, then doctors and nurses are unable to work. This has been an issue in South Africa, where Omicron is already dominant and nearly 20 percent of the health-care staff have COVID. Even if most of these cases are mild, huge numbers of people getting sick all at once will alter everyday reality.

Not every case will be mild, though, and even a small hospitalization rate on top of a huge case number will be a big number. With Delta, "we were already headed for a bad winter," says Roby Bhattacharyya, an infectious-diseases physician at Massachusetts General Hospital. Now, as my colleague Ed Yong reports, Omicron could push a collapsing health-care system further into disaster. Hospitals are already dealing with the flu and other winter viruses. They're already canceling elective surgeries. After another year of pandemic burnout, they simply may not have the staff to create the surge capacity that barely got us through last winter. Overtaxed hospitals mean care gets worse for everyone with COVID—but also everyone with a broken hip or a stroke or a baby that urgently needs to be delivered. Omicron's transmissibility is a danger because high levels of COVID cases come with these second-order consequences that transcend the risk to individuals.

If there are no changes to behavior or policy, this year's winter wave would peak at about double the hospitalizations of last winter at its worst, and 20 percent more deaths, according to the most pessimistic of projections from Meyers and her team at the University of Texas at Austin. The team gamed out a total of 18 scenarios, based on different guesses for the variant's inherent transmissibility and immune escape, booster uptake, and the vaccines' effectiveness against hospitalization and death. The most optimistic projection sees a caseload similar to last winter's, but hospitalizations and deaths at about half of where they were back then, assuming the vaccines keep up their very high protection against severe illness.

Vaccine protection against severe illness should be more durable than it is against infection, but may still take a hit. Very preliminary data from South Africa's largest health insurer suggest that two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were 70 percent effective at preventing hospitalization from Omicron infections, down from 93 percent before. If that holds, it's a "huge decrease," Meyers says, and one that matches the assumptions of her team's grimmer—but not grimmest—projections. When they modeled scenarios where vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization dropped by about that much, they saw a difference of tens of thousands of deaths.

The available evidence on Omicron's inherent severity is likely to be biased in ways that make it appear more promising. First of all, hospitalizations lag infections. "Omicron has been around for three weeks," Bhattacharyya says. "But so many of those infections have happened in the last one week of those three because of exponential growth." Second, the first people infected may skew young and are thus more likely to have mild cases regardless of the variant. And third, some of the mildness attributed to the virus may result instead from existing immunity. In South Africa, where doctors are reporting relatively low hospitalizations compared with previous waves, many cases are probably reinfections, given that the majority of people there have had COVID before. The South Africa health-insurer data suggest that Omicron might carry a 29 percent lower risk of hospitalization than the original virus, when adjusted for risk factors including age, sex, vaccination status, and documented prior infection—but many prior infections may be undocumented, which would make the reduction in risk seem bigger than it really is. (A recent analysis of early U.K. cases found "at most, limited changes in severity compared with Delta.") Meanwhile, Omicron is "going to spread so fast that to wait until we have definitive answers will be to wait too long," Bhattacharyya says. "If it's anything but the best-case scenario, and we wait to find out, it's going to be too late to mitigate the worst."

Another unknown is where Omicron's tendency to spread more quickly than Delta comes from. Is it inherently more transmissible, better at evading immunity, or both? And how much of one or the other? "We don't understand the new equilibrium," says Lone Simonsen, an epidemiologist at Roskilde University, in Denmark. In the long run, if Omicron's advantage is largely based on immune escape, then Delta and Omicron could co-circulate like multiple lineages of the flu, says Katia Koelle, an evolutionary virologist at Emory University. Getting sick with one variant might not give you much protection from the other. But if Omicron has advantages in both immune escape and transmission, then Delta could eventually go extinct.

Either way, in the short run, we will have a massive number of Omicron cases on top of a massive number of Delta cases. Together they will infect huge numbers of people, vaccinated or not, and burden an already overburdened health-care system. Boosters, social distancing, rapid testing, and masks can slow down this impact. We will know more about Omicron soon, but we already know enough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 07:26:38 AM
Don't Be Surprised When You Get Omicron (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/12/omicron-breakthrough-vaccine-testing/621014/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 09:07:19 AM
New York covid cases hit record high as omicron spreads and Rockettes, Broadway cancel shows

The 21,027 reported cases were the highest daily count during the pandemic, according to data analyzed by The Washington Post, although testing was less widely available in the early days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 12:04:16 PM
Spoke again today with my cousin living in South Africa (Johannesburg). No fear-mongering, panic-inducing articles in media of the type we see in Europe and the USA. No lockdown. They just returned from a vacation in Cape Town area: restaurants full, malls full, no Covid Pass. Her son-in-law and granddaughter had omicron: headaches, muscle aches, moderate fever, fatigue, all gone after 10 days of rest, sleep and home treatment.

Looks like the Third World is the place to be right now.  ;D



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 12:07:50 PM
Highly vaccinated countries thought they were over the worst. Denmark says the pandemic's toughest month is just beginning.

By Chico Harlan
Today at 9:24 a.m. EST

COPENHAGEN — In a country that tracks the spread of coronavirus variants as closely as any in the world, the signals have never been more concerning. Omicron positives are doubling nearly every two days. The country is setting one daily case record after another. The lab analyzing positive tests recently added an overnight shift just to keep up.

And scientists say the surge is just beginning.

As omicron drives a new phase of the pandemic, many are looking to Denmark — and particularly the government institute devoted to testing, surveillance and modeling — for warnings about what to expect.

The emerging answer — even in this highly vaccinated, wealthy northern European country — is dire. For all the defenses built over the last year, the virus is about to sprint out of control, and scientists here expect a similar pattern in much of the world.

"The next month will be the hardest period of the pandemic," said Tyra Grove Krause, the chief epidemiologist at Denmark's State Serum Institute, a campus of brick buildings along a canal.

Ever since the omicron variant emerged in November, the best hope has been that it might cause less severe sickness than the delta version it is competing with, which in turn might make this wave more manageable and help the transition of covid-19 into an endemic disease. But Denmark's projections show the wave so fully inundating the country that even a lessened strain will deliver an unprecedented blow.

Scientists caution that the knowledge of omicron remains imprecise. Denmark's virus modelers have many scenarios. But even in a middle-of-the-road scenario, Danish hospitals will soon face a daily flow of patients several times beyond what they've previously seen.[emphasis mine—kh]

"This will overwhelm hospitals," Grove Krause said. "I don't have any doubt about it."

In her office building, where she works with a six-person modeling team, she tried to explain why omicron amounts to such a setback in the fight against the pandemic. She likened the virus to a flood, and she described how vaccines, under earlier variants, had acted like two barrier walls safeguarding the health system. One barrier resulted from the vaccines' ability to reduce the probability of infection, keeping spread low. The other barrier stemmed from the diminished likelihood of severe sickness and death. Both barriers had some holes, but together, they ensured that the floodwaters never got too high.

But now, she said, the first barrier has been largely removed. Denmark's data shows people with two doses to be just as vulnerable to omicron infection as the unvaccinated. Those who've received boosters have better protection — a sign of hope — but meanwhile, about 3 in 4 Danes have yet to receive a third dose, making the majority of the country vulnerable.

That dynamic, coupled with a variant far more transmissible than the one from last winter, means any Danish person is now dramatically more likely to come in contact with the virus — including the old and the frail, as Denmark's demographics skew older, like much of the West. The water will now flow through the holes in the second wall.

On her double-monitor computer, Grove Krause pulled up the institute's latest projections, which scientists were still tweaking before releasing them to the public on Saturday. The range of possibilities is wide, but the very best scenario — which is unlikely, she said — shows daily hospitalizations matching the peak of last year. In most of the other scenarios, the numbers soar into the stratosphere.

Denmark's hospitals have never had more than 1,000 covid 19 patients at any given time, last winter's peak. But by early January, in a moderate scenario, hospitals could be seeing 500 new covid patients arriving every day. If omicron's transmissibility winds up on the higher end, and it proves just as severe as the delta variant, with a strong ability to evade vaccines, daily admissions could reach 800.

And then there is the matter of infections. Before this wave, Denmark had never seen more than 5,000 cases in a day. On Friday, it logged more than 11,000 new cases. Within a week, in a moderate scenario, case numbers could hit 27,000. And into January? The institute's estimates climb higher still, off the Y-axis.

With the surge coming into view, Denmark this month cut the opening hours for bars and restaurants, urged people to work from home, and closed schools seven days earlier than planned for Christmas break. Grove Krause cautioned that the projections didn't take into account the government's further moves announced Friday, which include the closure of cinemas and theaters. But even a full lockdown, she said, "won't stop this from getting out of control."

Denmark's projections are taken seriously around the world, because they are informed by an all-encompassing coronavirus surveillance system designed specifically for moments like this — when the nature of the virus is quickly shifting.

The system starts with testing: Denmark swabs more people than almost any other country — at a per capita pace seven times that of the United States. The tests, which are free for both citizens and travelers, then arrive at the State Serum Institute, as well as at a sister facility on the other side of the country. Lab technicians identify the positives within 24 hours. And by the following day, they know which variant is responsible for every case.

A portion of the positives are then fully genetically sequenced, delivering an extra layer of insight — allowing researchers not only to see mutations, but also to potentially understand who infected whom.

"We're seeing things pretty much in real time," said Arieh Cohen, head of development at the lab that processes test results and conducts the initial variant analysis.

What that data has shown, so far, is that the hospitalization rate is slightly lower for omicron than it is for delta — though because hospitalizations lag behind infections, and because omicron infections hit only recently, scientists say the results will be more meaningful in a couple of weeks.

Scientists have also identified how omicron was seeded throughout the country, first from travelers inbound from Africa, and then through several superspreader events. A just-published paper from the institute and other researchers described a Christmas party attended by about 150 people. Most were vaccinated. And yet 71 tested positive for omicron.

Initial omicron cases in Denmark have been concentrated disproportionately among people in their 20s — an age group that normally has mild symptoms, and whose infections might be missed by countries that test less. Some scientists at the institute think Denmark's wave is a week or two ahead of other Western countries. But others say many countries could already be experiencing the same pattern, with the young — who are most likely to travel and socialize — jump-starting community spread.

"There's a chance that Denmark is capturing the spread that other countries are missing," said Marc Stegger, whose team analyzes genomic data.

Scientists here say granular research only makes sense if the knowledge provides a way to safeguard the country — and it has in the past. A year ago, when the alpha variant was taking hold, Denmark quickly tightened its lockdown, significantly blunting the wave.

The government hasn't implemented a comprehensive lockdown this time. But it has tried to be responsive to the emerging science. Still, the spread has continued apace. For early omicron cases, Denmark tried to quarantine not just close contacts, but contacts of contacts; the strategy was abandoned after nine days because it became untenable.

At the State Serum Institute, many scientists talk wearily about the pre-omicron days as if reflecting on another era, back when the pandemic was manageable and understandable. In the past several weeks alone, the testing lab has hired 100 new people. It bought 20 new PCR machines. It started dipping into its reserve stockpile of plastic lab parts and competing with other countries for supplies. The institute's Christmas party, planned for last week, was canceled.

Scientists say they feel trepidation — and also a bit of awe — about what they are seeing: an incredibly fit virus, winning a turf war against delta. As of Monday — the most recent day with complete, publicly released data — omicron accounted for 26.8 percent of cases. A week earlier, omicron's share had been 4.9 percent.

"It's moving so fast," Cohen said, as more swabs arrived at the lab below his second-floor office. He said his chief concern was to keep things running. He called himself a "lab guy," and said thinking about the bigger picture was for the epidemiologists. But he ventured: "I can't help but have a fatalistic opinion: that we're all going to get this."

For the moment, the full consequences of the omicron variant are still on the horizon — weeks away, on a computer screen, or part of government warnings. In Britain, the only country that can match Denmark's variant surveillance, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has talked about a "tidal wave" of incoming cases. The variant is already dominant in London, and Europe's center for disease control says it is likely to become dominant on the continent as a whole in January or February. The United States, too, is bracing for a big wave and swamped hospitals as early as next month.

But the models project only a few weeks into the future, and what lies beyond — after the omicron wave crests and dissipates — is left to the scientific imagination.

At the State Serum Institute, the man with the imagination is Anders Fomsgaard, one of Denmark's best-known virologists. He's a saxophone enthusiast with curly hair. His colleagues call him an idea man. And he works in a squat yellow building where researchers are growing omicron cultures.

He greeted a visitor at the entrance, under neon lights shaped like geometrical fragments, which he explained represent HIV.

"Another epidemic," he said. "Still going on, by the way."

Perhaps, he said, omicron's origins are connected to HIV, as the virus could have come from an immunocompromised person whose body couldn't kill off the virus, which was able to grow and change. Even in Danish hospitals, he said, there are people who have had the coronavirus for seven or eight months. In Denmark, the changes are being monitored; in most places, they are not.

"This could be one of the ways you create this resistant virus," he said.

His goal, he said, is to help humanity finally get ahead of the coronavirus. And to that end, he's leading all sorts of experiments. Among them is research on a vaccine that targets T cells. Such a vaccine wouldn't protect against infection, but its goal would be to stop sickness. The advantage would be that it targets parts of the coronavirus that don't seem to mutate.

"We are all the time responding," he said. "We're behind. We are five steps behind."

He thinks the next month will be brutal, but after that? It's hard to say. Infected people, and there will be many, could come away with a deepened protection — pushing the coronavirus into something less menacing. But he also said the virus is impossible to eradicate fully. Maybe it could jump into rodents. Then maybe back into humans, re-formed. He described the coronavirus as a "master mutator," and clearly, with vaccination, humans are driving the virus into a corner, where it can either weaken or change.

"It could come out on the other end even weaker," Fomsgaard said. "But that is risky business. It might hit another jackpot mutation."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 12:09:35 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 12:04:16 PM
Spoke again today with my cousin living in South Africa (Johannesburg). No fear-mongering, panic-inducing articles in media of the type we see in Europe and the USA. No lockdown. They just returned from a vacation in Cape Town area: restaurants full, malls full, no Covid Pass. Her son-in-law and granddaughter had omicron: headaches, muscle aches, moderate fever, fatigue, all gone after 10 days of rest, sleep and home treatment.

Looks like the Third World is the place to be right now.  ;D





Glad your loved ones are faring well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 12:30:09 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 18, 2021, 12:09:35 PM
Glad your loved ones are faring well.

I hope and pray we all GMGers and all our loved ones will eventually emerge safe and sound from this bloody mess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 18, 2021, 01:34:59 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 12:04:16 PM
Spoke again today with my cousin living in South Africa (Johannesburg). No fear-mongering, panic-inducing articles in media of the type we see in Europe and the USA. No lockdown. They just returned from a vacation in Cape Town area: restaurants full, malls full, no Covid Pass. Her son-in-law and granddaughter had omicron: headaches, muscle aches, moderate fever, fatigue, all gone after 10 days of rest, sleep and home treatment.

Looks like the Third World is the place to be right now.  ;D

Wouldn't it be ironic if disease induced immunity was more effective against omicron than vaccine induced immunity. So that the African population was safer than the people in developed countries. We will know soon enough, I don't even know if it's even a possibility.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 02:04:36 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 18, 2021, 01:34:59 PM
Wouldn't it be ironic if disease induced immunity was more effective against omicron than vaccine induced immunity.

I for one am convinced that this is indeed the case. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 18, 2021, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 18, 2021, 12:07:50 PM
Highly vaccinated countries thought they were over the worst. Denmark says the pandemic's toughest month is just beginning.

By Chico Harlan
Today at 9:24 a.m. EST

Thanks for this. The quoted virologists here have hinted at something similar during the last week but not that explicit until now.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 18, 2021, 02:38:59 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 18, 2021, 01:34:59 PM
Wouldn't it be ironic if disease induced immunity was more effective against omicron than vaccine induced immunity. So that the African population was safer than the people in developed countries. We will know soon enough, I don't even know if it's even a possibility.

This (already - I saw it quoted on Bloomberg today) widely-cited article from Imperial College London says that

...the protection against reinfection by Omicron afforded by past infection may be as low as 19%...Controlling for vaccine status, age, sex, ethnicity, asymptomatic status, region and specimen date, Omicron was associated with a 5.40 (95% CI: 4.38-6.63) fold higher risk of reinfection compared with Delta. To put this into context, in the pre-Omicron era, the UK "SIREN" study of COVID infection in healthcare workers estimated that prior infection afforded 85% protection against a second COVID infection over 6 months. The reinfection risk estimated in the current study suggests this protection has  fallen to 19% (95%CI: 0-27%) against an Omicron infection.

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/232698/omicron-largely-evades-immunity-from-past/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 18, 2021, 02:47:33 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 18, 2021, 02:17:08 PM
Thanks for this. The quoted virologists here have hinted at something similar during the last week but not that explicit until now.



At your service, my friend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 02:51:10 PM
Quote from: T. D. on December 18, 2021, 02:38:59 PM
This (already - I saw it quoted on Bloomberg today) widely-cited article from Imperial College London

Argument from authority.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 18, 2021, 03:36:53 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 12:04:16 PMNo fear-mongering, panic-inducing articles in media of the type we see in Europe and the USA.


US press coverage of the pandemic has been unfailingly neutral, even-handed, and purely fact-based. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on December 18, 2021, 03:38:36 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 18, 2021, 02:51:10 PM
Argument from authority.

That wasn't an example of the Argument From Authority fallacy because T.D. wasn't claiming it to be a discussion stooping checkmate that nobody had the right to dissent.

If you want an actual example you could look at your own statements whenever the subject of Communism is touched on and you claim your limited subjective individual experience translates here into unquestionable all encompassing objective facts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on December 18, 2021, 04:05:47 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on December 18, 2021, 03:38:36 PM
That wasn't an example of the Argument From Authority fallacy because T.D. wasn't claiming it to be a discussion stopping checkmate that nobody had the right to dissent.

If you want an actual example you could look at your own statements whenever the subject of Communism is touched on and you claim your limited subjective individual experience translates here into unquestionable all encompassing objective facts.

I posted a link to the original academic report, no dilutions or interpretations by media. One would ordinarily assume (though perhaps Internet forums are different?  :laugh:) that reasonable semi-intelligent individuals could, if they so desire, read it and make their own inferences.

Golly gee whiz, I'd rather read some anonymous Internet blowhard talking out of his ass...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 19, 2021, 12:16:40 AM
Given the fact that the level of mutations of Omicron in comparison to previous variants is very high, it is hardly surprising that previous infection with older variants doesn't provide much protection against reinfection. But it might still make a difference in the severity of the ilness, they just don't know yet.

I guess "it's just like the flu"...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 19, 2021, 12:21:26 AM
Quote from: T. D. on December 18, 2021, 04:05:47 PM
I posted a link to the original academic report, no dilutions or interpretations by media. One would ordinarily assume (though perhaps Internet forums are different?  :laugh:) that reasonable semi-intelligent individuals could, if they so desire, read it and make their own inferences.

You're right. My comment was stupid. I apologize.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 19, 2021, 01:22:28 AM

Covid: Dutch go into Christmas lockdown over Omicron wave (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59713503)

I'm glad I just had a haircut....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vers la flamme on December 19, 2021, 07:39:09 AM
I got the booster on Friday, it was the Moderna. I was expecting to be completely wiped out for days like after I got the first shot (the J&J) about 6 months ago, but it was surprisingly mild. Just a headache and some fatigue. Glad to have these antibodies in my system... God knows what the future will look like covid-wise.

Anyone else get their booster recently? What have your experiences been like?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 08:38:20 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on December 19, 2021, 07:39:09 AM
I got the booster on Friday, it was the Moderna. I was expecting to be completely wiped out for days like after I got the first shot (the J&J) about 6 months ago, but it was surprisingly mild. Just a headache and some fatigue. Glad to have these antibodies in my system... God knows what the future will look like covid-wise.

Anyone else get their booster recently? What have your experiences been like?

Glad you took this one in stride. I got my booster some little while ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 09:10:26 AM
And: the natural consequence of Omicron Meets the Trumpland Vaccine-Resisters ...

Fauci warns omicron variant will cause record-high coronavirus hospitalizations, deaths in U.S.

By Amy B Wang, Sean Sullivan and Hannah Dreier
Today at 9:47 a.m. EST| Updated today at 11:01 a.m. EST

Anthony S. Fauci, the nation's leading infectious-disease specialist, warned Sunday that the United States is likely to see record numbers of coronavirus cases, hospitalizations and deaths as the omicron variant spreads rapidly.

"Unfortunately, I think that that is going to happen. We are going to see a significant stress in some regions of the country on the hospital system, particularly in those areas where you have a low level of vaccination," Fauci said on CNN's "State of the Union."

He continued to urge the unvaccinated to get their shots and those who have received only two doses of either the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines to get booster doses. Although vaccines cannot be the only layer of protection against the omicron variant, he said, defeating the pandemic would not be possible without them.

Fauci described omicron as "extraordinary," with a doubling time of two to three days. The variant accounts for 50 percent of coronavirus cases in certain regions of the country, which meant it would almost certainly take over as the dominant variant in the United States, he added.

"It is going to be a tough few weeks, months as we get deeper into the winter," Fauci said.

Fauci conceded that the Biden administration needed to do better about increasing the availability of at-home coronavirus rapid tests, though he stressed that the country was in a much better place than it was a year ago, with 200 million to 500 million tests available per month, many of them free.

"We're going in the right direction," he said. "We really need to flood the system with testing. We need to have tests available for anyone who wants them, particularly when we're in a situation right now where people are going to be gathering."

There are still safe ways for vaccinated people to get together for the holidays, including wearing a mask while traveling, testing beforehand and knowing the vaccination status of everyone present at indoor celebrations, Fauci said on ABC News's "Face the Nation."

"If you do these things, I do believe that you can feel quite comfortable with a family setting," he said. "Nothing is 100 percent risk-free, but I think if you do the things that I just mentioned, you'd actually mitigate that risk enough to feel comfortable about being able to enjoy the holiday."

Fauci said he expected it to be months before antiviral drugs can be mass-produced and available to anyone who needs them. While he did not foresee the kind of lockdowns that were put in place in the early days of the pandemic, Fauci also noted that it would be difficult to keep the virus under control when there remained "about 50 million people in the country who are eligible to be vaccinated who are not vaccinated."

President Biden plans to address the nation Tuesday on the status of the country's fight against the virus, the White House said Saturday.

"Building off his Winter Plan," White House press secretary Jen Psaki wrote on Twitter, Biden will announce "new steps the Administration is taking to help communities in need of assistance, while also issuing a stark warning of what the winter will look like for Americans that choose to remain unvaccinated."

Psaki said, "We are prepared for the rising case levels," adding that Biden "will detail how we will respond to this challenge. He will remind Americans that they can protect themselves from severe illness from COVID-19 by getting vaccinated and getting their booster shot when they are eligible."

The speech, coming just before Christmas and New Year's Day, underlines Biden's struggle to contain the pandemic nearly a year into office. On top of the emergence of new variants and attendant challenges, administration has at times faced criticism for what some have described as mixed signals.

Biden won high marks from the public during the first half of the year as cases declined, the country opened up from lockdown and vaccines became widely available. But the past few months have been far more difficult. After he gave a speech on July 4 saying the country was "closer than ever to declaring our independence from a deadly virus," the situation started changing. Case rates increased as the delta variant took a foothold and many Americans refused to get vaccinated.

Now, as closures and new public health precautions are imposed in areas hit hardest by the virus, Biden faces another potentially brutal stretch in the coming weeks that could strain hospitals and schools and further frustrate Americans at a time when many hoped to enjoy the holidays and put the toughest days of the pandemic behind them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 09:22:20 AM
Vermont confirms first case of Omicron variant — 12:27 p.m.
By The Associated Press

Health officials in Vermont have confirmed the state's first case of the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 virus.

The state Department of Health said Saturday that genetic sequencing identified the variant in a specimen collected Dec. 8 from a Lamoille County resident in their 30′s.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 09:25:05 AM
Spain's PM Sanchez calls emergency meeting — 7:58 a.m.
By Bloomberg

In a televised address on Sunday, Spanish Primer Minister Pedro Sanchez said the leaders will analyze the evolution of the pandemic in an extraordinary online meeting scheduled for Wednesday.

Spain's 14-day average infection rate climbed to more than 500 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, with hospitalizations tripling to 6,667 patients over the past month, according to Health Ministry data released on Friday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 09:26:27 AM
South Africa minister gets COVID -19 again — 5:30 a.m.
By Bloomberg
South African Minister of Minerals and Energy Gwede Mantashe tested positive for Covid-19 after experiencing mild symptoms, the second time he's contracted the virus.

The minister is in good spirits and in self-isolation, the presidency said in a statement on Sunday. Mantashe, 66, was hospitalized last year with Covid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 19, 2021, 09:31:34 AM
Labor Department extends deadline for companies to mandate vaccines — 10:16 p.m.
By New York Times

The Labor Department said on Saturday that it would delay until Feb. 9 the deadline for full enforcement of its rule requiring large companies to have their workers get coronavirus vaccines or be tested weekly, after weeks of legal battles created uncertainty and confusion for employers.

The department's move came a day after a federal appeals panel reinstated the Biden administration's rule requiring that companies with at least 100 employees mandate their workers be vaccinated against the coronavirus or face weekly testing by Jan. 4. The rule had also mandated that those employers require masks for unvaccinated workers by Dec. 5.

On cruise ships, Omicron puts safety protocols to the test — 9:05 p.m.
By New York Times
Since the cruise industry restarted operations in the United States this June, its efforts to keep the coronavirus at bay — or at least contained, unlike the major outbreaks experienced in 2020 — have been largely successful. Most cruise companies mandate full vaccinations for crew and most passengers, and have implemented strict health and safety protocols to swiftly identify coronavirus cases onboard and reduce their spread.

But in recent months, as new and highly contagious variants have emerged and case numbers steadily increase worldwide, these measures are being put to the test. Many lines are adjusting their masking, testing and vaccine rules, while criticism is mounting about the lack of transparency in reporting positive cases to passengers and crew members during sailings.

Omicron accounts for 80 percent of Miami-Dade's coronavirus cases, doctor says — 6:51 p.m.
By Lauren Booker, Globe Staff

A doctor says that more than 80 percent of recent coronavirus patients had the Omicron variant in Miami-Dade County, according to WPLG, a South Florida news station.

Dr. David Andrews, who works as a pathologist at the University of Miami Health, told the station that "this is unprecedented."

"We saw our first case of omicron on a sample obtained on Dec. 2," Andrews told WPLG.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 19, 2021, 09:52:43 AM

Doug Ericksen, state senator who fought vaccine mandates, dies at 52 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/19/doug-ericksen-dies-washington-senator-covid-vaccine-mandates)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 01:26:56 AM
SA could soon drop quarantining of Covid-19 contacts as this doesn't serve its purpose, says MAC (https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-12-19-sa-could-soon-drop-quarantining-covid-19-contacts-as-this-doesnt-serve-its-purpose-says-mac/)

The 10-day requirement to quarantine when you have come into contact with a Covid-19 case, and the subsequent contact tracing, could soon become a thing of the past if health minister Joe Phaahla approves a proposal to discontinue these prerequisites.

In an advisory dated December 16 and signed by the co-chairs of the ministerial advisory committee (MAC) on Covid-19, Prof Kholeka Mlisana and Prof Marian Jacobs propose that quarantining be discontinued with immediate effect for contacts of cases of Covid-19 as this "no longer serves a public health role".

"Identifying contacts of Covid-19 cases (that is) contact tracing equally serves very little role. In addition, contact tracing is impractical once the Covid-19 caseload rises due to the large number of contacts that have to be identified for each case, and is extremely burdensome in its use of human and financial resources," they said in a statement addressed to Phaahla and acting director-general for health Nicholas Crisp.

If approved, the discontinuation will apply to both vaccinated and non-vaccinated contacts.

"No testing for Covid-19 is required irrespective of the exposure risk, unless the contact becomes symptomatic. We further propose that contact tracing be stopped. As current testing only identifies a small minority of all Covid-19 cases, quarantining contacts of these cases serves no demonstrable general public health purpose," reads the document.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 01:32:20 AM
Covid hospitalisations up 70% in past week, but actual numbers very low (https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-12-17-covid-hospitalisations-up-70-in-past-week-but-actual-numbers-very-low/)

Omicron is in more than 76 countries across the globe, and in SA Covid-19 hospitalisations have seen a rapid 70% increase in the past week.

However, absolute numbers remain relatively low, and while the number of infections is rising quickly in every province, in Gauteng they are coming down.

This is according to health minister Joe Phaahla, who hosted a briefing on Friday morning.

He said a week ago, Gauteng accounted for around 80% of all new infections but it is now at 25%.

Numbers have already exceeded the peaks of all other waves, and the positivity rate (percentage of tests confirming infections) is at a high of 31%.

On the upside, however, the ratio of hospitalisations to infections in the second week of the fourth wave has been 1.7%. In the same week of the third wave it was 19%.

The recovery rate is 91%, and there are around 7,600 patients in hospital with Covid-19.

Phaahla cautioned: "Mildness with Omicron may not be less virulent but seems so due to high vaccine coverage. In the over-60s almost two-thirds of the population are vaccinated and in the over-50s it's at around 60%."

He said natural immunity from past infections was also likely to be playing a role in reducing severity of disease.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 01:41:05 AM
Omicron variant: The West finds yet another reason to keep Africans out (https://mg.co.za/africa/2021-12-19-omicron-variant-the-west-finds-yet-another-reason-to-keep-africans-out/)

Late last month, scientists in South Africa announced that they had identified a new variant of Covid-19 — Omicron — and that it was spreading fast.

Less than 48 hours later, the United Kingdom had banned travel from South Africa and its neighbours, and cancelled flights. The European Union followed suit, as did North America and some Middle Eastern nations. Almost overnight, Southern Africa became a pariah, almost totally isolated from the outside world. Even some African countries have restricted travel from the region.

Early in the pandemic, there were warnings that Western nations would swallow up vaccines and then point to Covid in Africa as a reason to lock down borders. Africa would become "the Covid Continent", warned John Nkengasong, the boss of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

These new restrictions were initially justified as a necessary response to the new variant. If the variant can't get in, it can't spread.

Except the variant was already there.

More than 40 countries have now detected cases of Omicron. Some of these appeared to have no connection to Southern Africa. In at least one instance — in the Netherlands — the positive sample was collected before South Africa made its announcement, suggesting that it was circulating in Europe before it got to Southern Africa.

Yet the travel restrictions against Southern Africa remain in place. No travel restrictions have been implemented against Western countries where Omicron has been detected.

African leaders are getting increasingly irate: there appears to be one rule for Africa, and another for everywhere else.

Speaking at the Dakar International Forum on Peace and Security this week, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa was decidedly undiplomatic. He said he had received "patronising" and "paternalistic" phone calls from European leaders — none of whom was able to adequately justify the draconian restrictions. "You ask yourself, where is science? They always said to us, base your decisions on science, but when the moment comes for them to be more scientific they are not," he said.

Malawi's president said the bans were "Afrophobia" in action. Botswana's president called them "unnecessary" and "irresponsible". Nigeria's high commissioner to the UK described them as "travel apartheid", and the African Union highlighted the hypocrisy by saying: "Despite the widespread distribution of Omicron cases globally, the majority of border closures solely target flights to and from South Africa and neighbouring countries in southern Africa, some of which have no evidence of the omicron variant and relatively low daily Covid-19 case numbers." Leaders are rarely so blunt.
'It makes no sense at all'

It's not just African leaders who are nonplussed. The response by some of the most prominent public health experts in Africa was unequivocal.

"The current bans do not make sense at all from a public health perspective," said Catherine Kyobutungi, an epidemiologist and executive director of the African Population and Health Research Centre. "Travel bans can only make sense if they are total, that is, that a country shuts itself off completely from the rest of the world."

This is the approach that China has taken, with a few exceptions.

Kyobutungi added: "The problem is that the countries instituting travel bans also have lousy in-country Covid-19 prevention measures and rather than deal with their failures they are using travel bans to give the impression of doing something."

Daily cases in South Africa are in the single digit thousands, but those in Germany and the UK are in the tens of thousands. Mismanagement of the pandemic in the latter has meant the deaths of some 150 000 people.

Thierno Balde, the incident manager for the World Health Organisation's Covid-19 Emergency Response in Africa, echoed this sentiment. "Travel bans directed at Southern African nations are unfair and we strongly encourage countries to reconsider these bans."

He warned that they may ultimately prove counterproductive — because, in effect, Southern Africa is being punished for the excellence and the openness of its scientists. "If any country, not just African countries, fears crippling consequences that can negatively impact the personal and professional lives of their citizens, we may not see such openness in future. This would most certainly threaten global disease control."

These consequences are already being felt. Because of the dramatic drop in flights to the region, South African scientists are running out of the chemicals necessary to do more Covid-19 sequencing.

Dr Mounia Amrani, the Southern Africa medical coordinator for Médecins Sans Frontières, said the public health community has known for months that travel bans "are completely ineffective. So what is surprising is to see them used again, particularly when we had so little information about the omicron variant."

More surprising is that "they blocked only the outside borders, while the virus is already circulating in the EU".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 05:39:05 AM
Like Trump, B.J. reserves the right to host super-spreader events, I guess:

Britain's omicron cases soar as new lockdown party allegations at Boris Johnson's residence come to light

By William Booth
Today at 9:00 a.m. EST

LONDON — Scientists are pushing Prime Minister Boris Johnson to take tougher measures to slow the exploding number of new infections driven by the omicron variant — as more photos emerge of more alleged parties held at his 10 Downing Street office during lockdown last year.

It is an almost surreal split screen Monday on the BBC.

Coronavirus cases are surging, especially in London, where Mayor Sadiq Khan declared an emergency amid fears that so many essential workers will become infected and need to isolate that health and security services may be threatened.

Meanwhile, Johnson finds himself at the center of another mini-scandal. The Guardian newspaper on Sunday published a photograph depicting a "wine-and-cheese party" in the garden of Downing Street. Bottles and glasses can clearly be seen — and so can Johnson and his wife Carrie, alongside 17 other attendees.

The Guardian reported that the outdoor affair took on May 15, 2020, when gatherings of more than two people were banned in outdoor public places.

A spokesman for Downing Street said no lockdown rules were broken, that the garden was a private not a public place, and that this was not a party, but a "work meeting," which was deemed "essential."

Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab told BBC, "I know how hard that Number 10 team were working, as the hub, the fulcrum of the crisis response. I think there's a lot of exhausted people, and they, as people do in work, were having a drink after the formal business had been done."[not an "essential" "work meeting," in other words.—kh]

The leader of the opposition Labour Party, Keir Starmer called Raab's claim "a stretch" and reminded the country that in May 2020 many people who followed the rules were unable to attend funerals of loved ones.

The latest photograph follows a string of other recent setbacks and embarrassments, including mock news conference that saw a chief spokeswoman making light of alleged violations of lockdown measures by Downing Street staff during Christmas 2020.

Johnson has denied that any rules were broken, but under pressure from his own Conservative Party, he ordered an internal inquiry by Britain's top civil servant, Simon Case.

Soon after, Case was forced to recuse himself from the probe following reports that a gathering was held in his own office around the same time.

In London, shopping streets saw smaller crowds over the weekend, while pub and restaurant owners complained of a flood of party cancellations.

The Natural History Museum announced it was temporarily shutting down due to staff shortages caused by infections and isolation rules.

Patricia Marquis, England director for the Royal College of Nursing union, told the BBC Monday that hospitals were under "immense stress and pressure" because health-care workers were themselves becoming infected and had to stay home

"So, staff are looking forward now thinking, 'Oh my goodness, what is coming?'" Marquis said.

Johnson and his cabinet are scheduled to meet Monday to discuss tougher measure to confront omicron. Among the options, described by British news media, are an advisory to ask families to host smaller holiday parties; a legal mandate on household mixing; an evening curfew on pubs and restaurants; or a return to full lockdown.

Scientific advisers to the government warned that without stricter measures, 3,000 people could enter hospitals in Britain each day, up from the 900 daily admissions now.

In the midst of the holiday season, the government advisers said large indoor gatherings posed high risk of seeding "multiple spreading events."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 05:42:36 AM
Nearly 50 people on Royal Caribbean cruise that docked in Miami test positive for coronavirus (https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2021/12/20/royal-caribbean-cruise-coronavirus-omicron/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 05:55:42 AM
COVID-19 hospitalizations are rising, but some cases are milder than before

By Kay Lazar and Andrew Brinker Globe Staff  and Globe Correspondent, Updated December 19, 2021, 5:09 p.m.

Amid surging COVID-19 infections, overflowing hospitals, and exhausted healthcare workers, Massachusetts hospital leaders are hanging [onto] a glimmer of hope: some treatments, vaccines, and hard-won knowledge from the earlier outbreaks have meant fewer severely ill COVID patients.

And those who do need intensive care generally are recovering more quickly, doctors say.

"The proportion of [COVID] patients in the ICU has gone down slightly and the average length of stay for the ICU has gone down slightly," said Dr. Paul Biddinger, director of emergency preparedness at Mass General Brigham, the state's largest hospital system.

But doctors are not letting their guard down.

"This is encouraging to be sure, but no one should be blasé about this," said Dr. Richard Schwartzstein, chief of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

"There are patients getting as sick as they were before and still dying, despite these advanced therapies," Schwartzstein said. "But the vast majority are the ones who are not vaccinated," he said.

A snapshot of COVID-positive patients in Beth Israel's intensive care units over two days last week underscored that point: fewer than half were vaccinated.

At Tufts Medical Center, the discrepancy is even starker. Six of seven COVID-19 patients in critical care on Thursday were unvaccinated. And those without shots represented almost 60 percent of the total hospitalized patients with COVID there.

"The key is that those who are vaccinated leave earlier, leave faster, and aren't as sick," said Terry Hudson-Jinks, chief nursing officer at Tufts. "That is the theme every single time."

Of those developing serious illness and dying from COVID, most are "the oldest patients, 80s and 90s," said Todd Ellerin, director of infectious diseases at South Shore Hospital in Weymouth. And, he said, they are also the patients who have weakened immune systems or multiple underlying health problems.

Across Massachusetts, all hospitalized patients are tested for COVID, so such a diagnosis could be incidental to what landed a person in the hospital. State data does not distinguish between those hospitalized for COVID-19 care and those diagnosed with the virus but admitted for other reasons, nor does the data from most hospitals.

The latest state data show that just 2 percent of the roughly 5 million fully vaccinated people have so-called breakthrough COVID infections. And a more detailed breakdown of such cases requested by the Globe shows that a much smaller number of people, roughly 0.5 percent of all the breakthrough cases, are hospitalized and die. Roughly half of that group were 80 years or older, the data show.

Now, as more vaccinated people get booster shots, the percentage of vaccinated patients admitted to hospitals for COVID treatment is declining, said Dr. Eric Dickson, chief executive of UMass Memorial Health.

"The booster is starting to have a positive impact in reducing the number of breakthrough cases," he said. "It's still largely three-quarters a surge of the unvaccinated."

Compared to the early days of the pandemic, fewer COVID patients are dying, hospital administrators said, in part due to lessons learned that improved care. Hospitalized patients now are often given high-dose oxygen as soon as possible in hopes of avoiding placing them on ventilators, machines that pump air into their lungs, but can produce long-term complications.

Another advancement is the use of dexamethasone, a powerful steroid that helps reduce inflammation and has been shown to be helpful in people with severe COVID who are hospitalized and on ventilators or who require supplemental oxygen. Many people had not heard of the drug before October 2020 when President Trump received it during his treatment for COVID-19.

Newer in the armament is Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody that reduces inflammation and had been used in the treatment of other diseases such as cancer. It was authorized in June by federal regulators to treat COVID in ventilated patients and those receiving oxygen. Doctors still use the antibodies from Regeneron and Eli Lilly that were approved earlier in the pandemic, but as the Omicron variant storms across the country, some monoclonal antibodies have been found to have significantly diminished potency against the new strain.

Monoclonal antibodies, the laboratory-made proteins that mimic the body's immune system and stop the virus, can keep people with COVID from getting seriously ill if taken within 10 days after symptoms appear. Doctors say these drugs have been remarkably effective in keeping people from needing hospitalization.

"Some of the patients with monoclonal antibodies end up being hospitalized, but they are not as sick," said Dickson, of UMass Memorial Health, which has been administering about 200 such treatments per week in its outpatient center and a small number in the hospital.

One monoclonal antibody that is holding promise of standing up to Omicron is a new drug, called Evusheld, recently authorized by the Food and Drug Administration, that can be given to patients with weak immune systems before they're exposed to COVID, in hopes of limiting severe illness.

"We don't have it available yet, but I think it will be here before the end of the year," said Biddinger of Mass General Brigham.

As the number of people hospitalized for COVID in Massachusetts continues to rise sharply — it has more than doubled over the past month, to 1,499 — Biddinger and other hospital leaders say the deluge is overwhelming their already strained operations and bone-weary staff.

"The demand for care is as high as it's ever been," Biddinger said.

Hospitals, anxious about being swamped early in the pandemic, postponed many procedures, such as colonoscopies and joint replacements, to make room for COVID patients. Now patients with advanced cancers, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses who delayed care are swamping hospitals, sicker than ever.

Many of the facilities are also facing staffing shortages. And now, Biddinger said, patients frustrated at having to wait hours and even days for a hospital bed are taking their anger out on staff.

"Things are much more crowded and you spend 18 hours on a hallway stretcher, you get cranky," he said.

"Not all [visiting] family members wear their masks the way they should," Biddinger added. "Many times a day, nurses have to remind a family member to follow our infection-control procedures. It's just exhausting."

The anxiety among hospital leaders is palpable as they talk about the weeks ahead, when the current surge of COVID cases from the Delta variant is expected to swell to a tsunami with Omicron, too.

"There was so much hope that perhaps [vaccination] would prevent another surge," said Hudson-Jinks, the chief nursing officer at Tufts. "It's very disappointing that we are here again, seeing the numbers of COVID patients increase in the community and in here. It's exhausting."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 06:06:29 AM
What happens when students remove masks? These Mass. schools are finding out

By Naomi Martin Globe Staff, Updated December 19, 2021, 5:48 p.m.

HOPKINTON — By lunchtime Thursday, word had spread through Hopkinton High School about a slew of basketball players testing positive for COVID-19. Already far more students had begun wearing face-coverings in the school, which in November became the first in Massachusetts to allow vaccinated students to go mask-less.

Over lunch, five senior boys expressed anxiety. They hoped the school board that night would temporarily reinstate the school's mask mandate. But other students wanted the relaxed mask policies, which they didn't believe caused the outbreak, to continue. Two sophomore girls in the library studied without masks, happy to see each other's smiles. They felt the mask-choice policy gave them something elusive in the past two years: a typical high school experience.

"Last year, it felt like you couldn't talk to anyone who wasn't your friend," said Sophie Weeden, 15. "This year, it's gotten back to a little more normal — it's so much better."

The division over how to proceed at Hopkinton High, one of a handful of schools that has followed the state's protocol for making masks optional, reveals the complexity of changing COVID policies in one of the country's most vaccinated states, as officials aim to better serve students' learning and social needs while trying to keep families and teachers safe amid an ever-changing pandemic.

At least five schools in Massachusetts — including Westborough's high school and middle school, Norwell High School, and King Philip Regional High School in Wrentham — have allowed vaccinated students to unmask. Most of the school districts have not seen significant increases in COVID cases among students or staff, state data show. Until this past week, neither had Hopkinton High. But as of Friday, the school had recorded 15 new cases.

"It's been exciting to get back to some sense of normalcy, but as we're seeing an uptick in cases, we're once again getting reality shoved at us," said Hopkinton math teacher Jenna Galster, whose statistics class was about half-masked Thursday.

To become exempt from the state's school mask mandate, the schools had to first attest to the state that 80 percent of students and staff were fully vaccinated.

While many schools in Massachusetts meet that threshold, only 28 schools have sought and received state permission to lift their mask mandates, officials said. Most have not moved forward with the change, amid rising COVID cases and the uncertainty about the new Omicron variant. In some places, like Franklin and Ashland, school officials paused plans to go mask-optional this month.

But with the state's school mask mandate set to expire Jan. 15, education policymakers are looking toward the towns that have already allowed students to remove masks as they consider the thorny decisions about what to do in local communities. At local and state public meetings, some parents have testified through tears about their kids experiencing mental distress and learning difficulties due to masks, while other families have urged officials to protect high-risk students and staff with universal masking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on December 20, 2021, 06:28:54 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on December 19, 2021, 07:39:09 AM
I got the booster on Friday, it was the Moderna. I was expecting to be completely wiped out for days like after I got the first shot (the J&J) about 6 months ago, but it was surprisingly mild. Just a headache and some fatigue. Glad to have these antibodies in my system... God knows what the future will look like covid-wise.

Anyone else get their booster recently? What have your experiences been like?

I haven't received my booster yet, but I had my 2nd dose of Pfizer in September, so I'll have to wait until March to get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 20, 2021, 06:33:02 AM
There's a tendency in many places to shorten the time for availability of the 3rd jab.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 20, 2021, 06:59:49 AM
I got mine early during a check-up for another medication I take- they just offered it to me, as kind of a "wink wink" thing even though I was technically a few weeks early.



If the mildness of the new wave seems to hold, I imagine the next big policy fight will be whether or not this is good cause to start relaxing pandemic restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 07:05:50 AM
An old friend of mine, who can be both an annoying knowitall, and rather an ass, lectured me last night on how masks supposedly make no difference. /he's down in The Sunshine State, and the lecture sprang from my asking if folks down by him wear masks. Note to self: You may think it's an innocent question, but....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 20, 2021, 07:15:03 AM
nothing is innocent in the culture war.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 20, 2021, 07:16:02 AM
After more than 3 weeks, still a lot of uncertainty about Omicron here in DK, except from it being much more infectuous. So far, hospitalizations and ICUs seem to have been relatively few, but the infection rate continues to be steep, and January is expected to be tough in the health sector.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 07:17:03 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 20, 2021, 07:15:03 AM
nothing is innocent in the culture war.

Truly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 20, 2021, 07:18:24 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 20, 2021, 06:33:02 AM
There's a tendency in many places to shorten the time for availability of the 3rd jab.

As of today the 3rd dose is allowed after a 3 month delay. Before that it was 6 months. I'm getting mine tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 07:22:40 AM
Quote from: André on December 20, 2021, 07:18:24 AM
As of today the 3rd dose is allowed after a 3 month delay. Before that it was 6 months. I'm getting mine tomorrow.

Very good.

Separately—

Jennifer Rubin: If you are tired and frustrated after two years of the pandemic, I understand. I am, too. Who's to blame? The anti-vaccine propagandists and the ambitious politicians who lie to Americans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 08:28:52 AM
My father-in-law (soon to be 74, two cumulated life-threatening commorbidities, had Covid-19 in March) got the Johnson & Johnson jab today. So far, so good, not even mild adverse reactions. Fingers crossed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 08:45:27 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 20, 2021, 07:05:50 AM
An old friend of mine, who can be both an annoying knowitall, and rather an ass, lectured me last night on how masks supposedly make no difference. /he's down in The Sunshine State, and the lecture sprang from my asking if folks down by him wear masks. Note to self: You may think it's an innocent question, but....

The UK's scientific advisory group to the Government reached this conclusion about masks in the context of omicron (my emphasis)

QuoteMany face coverings such as scarves, other single-layer fabrics and valved masks, though currently permitted, are likely to be ineffective at reducing transmission. There is significant scope to improve effectiveness through use of higher quality, well-fitting face coverings. Renewed public communications on selection and wearing of effective face coverings is likely to be beneficial. Offering free masks at entry points would likely improve adherence by mitigating cost and improving availability.


It may not be realistic to enforce "higher quality, well-fitting face coverings" with the general public -- at least if that means medical grade masks. There's a lot of devil in the detail there. What quality is higher quality? How well fitting is well-fitting?  They're likely to be expensive and uncomfortable . . .


https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emg-and-spi-b-non-pharmaceutical-interventions-npis-in-the-context-of-omicron-15-december-2021/emg-and-spi-b-non-pharmaceutical-interventions-npis-in-the-context-of-omicron-15-december-2021
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 20, 2021, 10:08:07 AM

     Moderna says its booster significantly raises the level of antibodies to thwart Omicron. (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/health/moderna-covid-booster-omicron.html)

Given how quickly Omicron is marching through the world, Moderna said, the company will focus its near-term efforts on extra shots of the original vaccine. It also plans to test a booster shot that is specific to the Omicron variant early next year and to include Omicron in a multivalent booster.

     I'm triple jabbed with Moderna through no fault of my own. It looks like it's better to be lucky than good.

     From fairly early on I surmised that the path forward for this virus would be similar to that of influenza and perhaps even more similar to the common cold. It would become more contagious and less lethal. Therefore, mild Covid variants will not only give "vaccine plus" natural immunity to itself but to subsequent strains. So if a more lethal variant arrives we won't be back to square one. For the vaccinated breakthrough infections will produce mild symptoms and significantly increase the level of protection against whatever comes net.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 10:17:31 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 20, 2021, 10:08:07 AM
     Moderna says its booster significantly raises the level of antibodies to thwart Omicron. (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/health/moderna-covid-booster-omicron.html)

Did anyone expect Moderna or Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson to say otherwise?  ;D

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 20, 2021, 11:08:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 10:17:31 AM
Did anyone expect Moderna or Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson to say otherwise?  ;D



     Did other companies say the same thing, or an otherwise thing? I don't know what anyone expected, but I'm not surprised that Moderna would continue to perform at a high level.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 11:17:36 AM
This will twist Ted Cruz' knickers:

Mask-wearing on planes may be here to stay, Fauci says

By Paulina Firozi
Today at 9:43 a.m. EST

Mask-wearing on planes may be here to stay, top federal infectious-disease expert Anthony S. Fauci says.

In an interview on ABC News's "This Week" on Sunday, he was asked if he believes there will be a point when it won't be necessary to wear masks during air travel.

"I don't think so," he said. "I think when you're dealing with a closed space, even though the filtration is good, that you want to go that extra step."

Fauci's mask-wearing suggestion came as top government health officials sounded the alarm about the rapidly spreading omicron variant, noting that it already accounts for 50 percent of coronavirus cases in parts of the United States. Just as many prepare to travel for end-of-year holidays, health officials warned of a tough winter ahead — strengthening calls for the unvaccinated to get their shots and the vaccinated to get boosted.

Fauci's comments also follow remarks from Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly, who said during a Senate hearing last week that masks "don't add much, if anything, in the air cabin environment."

Kelly, who tested positive for the coronavirus days after the hearing, added: "It's very safe, very high-quality, compared to any other indoor setting."

During the same hearing, American Airlines CEO Doug Parker argued an "aircraft is the safest place you can be. It's true of all of our aircraft — they all have the same HEPA filters and air flow."

Fauci said Sunday that "even though you have a good filtration system, I still believe that masks are a prudent thing to do, and we should be doing it."

In separate television interviews, Fauci and Francis S. Collins, whose last day as director of the National Institutes of Health was Sunday, stopped short of calling on people to cancel travel plans. They warned of risks associated with traveling, even for the vaccinated, and urged people to do so carefully.

Fauci advised people to be cautious as they travel.

"If you are vaccinated and boosted and are prudent when you travel, when you're in an airport, to be wearing a mask all the time — you have to be wearing a mask on a plane," he said.

Collins said the virus "is going to be all around us."

"I'm not going to say you shouldn't travel, but you should do so very carefully," he said in an interview on CBS News's "Face the Nation." "People are going, 'I'm so sick of hearing this,' and I am, too. But the virus is not sick of us, and it is still out there looking for us, and we've got to double down on these things if we're going to get through the next few months."

Earlier this year, Fauci said people may decide in the long term to wear masks to help curb the spread of viruses during certain seasons.

In a May interview on NBC News's "Meet the Press," he referred to the limited flu activity last season because of widespread public health mitigation measures.

"It is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you'll spread these respiratory-borne diseases," he said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 11:20:04 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 20, 2021, 11:08:41 AM
     Did other companies say the same thing, or an otherwise thing?

I am not aware of any other companies beside Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson whose vaccines have been approved in the USA and the EU, either under emergency use or permanently.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 11:25:09 AM
Trump got his booster, after Fox News goaded him to knock boosters


By Aaron Blake
Senior reporter
Today at 2:01 p.m. EST

If you want a case-in-point of how coronavirus vaccine skepticism gets seeded on the right, you'd struggle to do better than former president Donald Trump's August interview on Fox News.

And Trump's new disclosure that he got his booster reinforces it.

To recap: Trump said in a new conversation with Bill O'Reilly that he has gotten his coronavirus booster. This follows on Trump having relatively frequently encouraged people to get the vaccine — even as he initially declined to do so and didn't disclose getting vaccinated while in the White House. (The news only leaked out in March.)

Trump saying this is particularly important given the current natural-immunity push on the right; Trump was infected with the coronavirus in October 2020. Since then, he got the vaccine and a booster.

But for a moment in August, the Trump was goaded into seriously questioning the same booster he now says he has gotten.

Trump said early in the interview with ally Maria Bartiromo that people should get the vaccine — in arguably stronger terms than he had before.

"I recommend that people take it," he said, before stressing that people should have the choice.

Trump added: "Now one thing: When you have the vaccine, people that do — and it's a very small number relatively, but people that do get it — get better much quicker. And it's very important to know. They don't get nearly as sick, and they get better. [Sen.] Lindsey Graham is an example. He said, if I didn't have this vaccine, I would have died."

"So once you get the vaccine, you get better," Trump added.

Bartiromo, though, quickly took the conversation back to boosters, after Trump initially ignored her question about whether he would get one. And she helpfully suggested that maybe his answer on boosters might be different.

"It's a great point," she said, "but I still come back to the idea — I still come back to the idea of a booster shot. I mean, yes, you are right, the vaccines work — "

The clear subtext: I mean, the vaccines work, but what about this other thing?

Trump took the cue. He quickly suggested that maybe — just maybe — the boosters were actually a "moneymaking operation for Pfizer."

"Think of the money involved," he said, adding: "The whole thing is just crazy. It doesn't — you wouldn't think you would need a booster. You know, when these first came out, they were good for life."

That idea that the vaccines were "good for life" was never assumed to be true, but the fact that Trump was talking in these terms furthered the cause of vaccine skepticism. And he very much seemed to be giving Bartiromo the kind of answer that she wanted.

Trump's disclosure Sunday that he got the booster reinforces that even this man who declined to initially tell people to get vaccinated, who got a natural infection, and who questioned the push for boosters has now gotten one himself. That's arguably the biggest point — that this paragon of a Republican Party that remains so vaccine-resistant has taken the next step, despite his personal skepticism.

But the big point, when it comes to how that broader skepticism became what it is today, is how Trump was pulled into saying what he did in August. Here was a guy asked about the booster and who hailed the benefits of the vaccines in response. But that wasn't the answer that was desired. And Trump, mindful of catering to his base, obliged with a highly conspiratorial message that maybe the boosters were just a Big Pharma money-grab.

To Trump's credit, he has — however infrequently and delayed — continued to point to the benefits of vaccination and now boosters. He has done so even as other prominent conservatives have wagered that dancing around their booster status (Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis) or vaccination status (Tucker Carlson) or hailing their unvaccinated status (Sarah Palin) is the way to go.

He also did so even after getting booed for it, which happened at a rally shortly after his Bartiromo interview. That shouldn't get lost in all of this, and it continues to be a wonder someone hasn't bankrolled a TV ad playing Trump's repeated comments endorsing vaccination.

But the larger procedural point is why Trump, in delivering his comments, again got jeered by the O'Reilly audience. "Don't, don't, don't, don't," Trump said in response, assuring: "It's a very tiny group over there."

While it might be a tiny group that is bold enough to jeer their hero, it's hardly a tiny group that is feeding them what they and others who are vaccine-reluctant want to hear — often relying upon the kind of innuendo Trump was convinced to traffic in back in August.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 11:35:59 AM
Opinion: The torment of hope in the time of the plague

By Max Boot
Columnist
Today at 12:52 p.m. EST

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."

— Friedrich Nietzsche

NEW YORK — I have been thinking about Nietzsche's typically dour observation recently as my hometown confronts yet another coronavirus wave. Back in the spring of 2020, I had hope — based on models of the pandemic's expected course — that it would fade away by summer. We know how that went. Hundreds of thousands of deaths later, I should have known better than to hold out any expectation of things improving. And yet I did.

This fall, once again I thought I saw light at the end of the tunnel, only to discover that it was the lamp of an oncoming locomotive. I was foolhardy enough in October to book a family trip to France over the holidays with friends. It was a tradition that we had foregone the past two years and were eager to resurrect. We were all fully vaccinated, and the delta wave seemed to be cresting. It seemed safe enough. Then came the omicron wave, washing away the best-laid holiday plans of millions.

Now we anxiously scan the headlines to see whether France is going to close to American tourists as it has already closed to British ones. Even if France remains open, we fret that one of our family members — or more than one — will test positive for the coronavirus and be unable to go. And even if we do make it there, will we be able to make it back? What if one of us tests positive over there?

The anxiety is debilitating. The prospect of a vacation shouldn't be so stressful. Given that most of my family is triple-vaccinated (all except a 14-year-old who isn't allowed to be boosted), I am not particularly afraid of the health risks of catching omicron, at least for us. What I am afraid of is the psychological and economic impact of omicron on a society just beginning to dream of a return to "normality."

Now, omicron caseloads are skyrocketing in New York City; soon it will be the same all over the country. Companies are again closing offices. Broadway shows and sporting events are again being canceled. Universities are again suspending in-person classes, and rumors abound that schools will be next. Hardy diners are again shivering in freezing temperatures because we don't want to risk eating indoors.

Once again, we are all forced to become amateur epidemiologists trying to assess which activities are safe and which aren't. We have been going to the movies ever since the spring. We even went to our first Broadway show since the pandemic started ("The Lehman Trilogy" — I can't recommend it highly enough). But is it too big a risk to run now? What about taking the subway or going to the gym? You have to make countless difficult decisions and constantly fret that you made a mistake. Once again, you have to wonder if every sniffle or cough is just a cold — or covid?

This is the last thing I ever expected nearly two years since the onset of the pandemic, and yet here we are. We all desperately want to return to normal life, but the virus has other ideas.

Whose fault is this? I blame the unvaccinated — the roughly 100 million Americans who refuse, for perverse reasons, to get fully immunized. I am part of the silent majority that wears our masks, gets our vaccine shots and now finds ourselves at the mercy of the selfish blockheads who refuse to take even minimal steps to combat the deadliest pandemic in U.S. history. They are being egged on by demagogues such as former Alaska governor Sarah Palin. She just told a right-wing gathering, to cheers, that it will be "over my dead body that I'll have to get a shot." Given how many covid deniers have died of the disease, that stance could prove prophetic for some people.

But honestly, at this point, I am too exhausted to even be all that angry. I just want this to end.

And I have to acknowledge that even countries such as Denmark and the United Kingdom, which have higher vaccination rates, are still being hammered by omicron. We would have had many fewer deaths in the United States if we had had more competent leadership. (A new House report finds fresh "evidence of the Trump Administration's deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes.") But even if Franklin D. Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln had been in charge, we still would be struggling with omicron today.

So much of this pandemic seems to be beyond our comprehension or control. It makes you realize how insignificant we humans are, how little our designs count compared with the caprices of nature. Yet — foolish man — I still dream of better, brighter days. I read the news from South Africa — that omicron cases already might be peaking, with half the hospitalizations of the delta wave — and I pray that our experience will be similar.

Haven't I learned anything? I continue to be tormented by hope.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Artem on December 20, 2021, 11:48:18 AM
What an odd venting piece.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 20, 2021, 11:55:23 AM
Quote from: Artem on December 20, 2021, 11:48:18 AM
What an odd venting piece.

Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 12:50:17 PM
This is very good I think, if you can get it -- use a VPN if you can't. No answers, no reassurances, but still very good to see the complexity of the problems.  Spiegelhalter is just the sort of prof we all need.


https://www.channel4.com/news/unvaccinated-very-likely-to-get-covid-this-winter-says-prof-sir-david-spiegelhalter
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 20, 2021, 01:06:00 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 12:50:17 PM
This is very good I think, if you can get it -- use a VPN if you can't. No answers, no reassurances, but still very good to see the complexity of the problems.  Spiegelhalter is just the sort of prof we all need.


https://www.channel4.com/news/unvaccinated-very-likely-to-get-covid-this-winter-says-prof-sir-david-spiegelhalter

So....London - thanks to the British "let the virus rip" strategy - is going to be the test case for the rest of Europe...

Sofar "the vast majority" of people in Intensive Care is unvaccinated. Amongst them "a troubling amount" of pregnant women. All unvaccinated are likely to catch the virus during this winter.

Any more questions?  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 20, 2021, 01:09:03 PM
Quote from: Que on December 20, 2021, 01:06:00 PM
All unvaccinated are likely to catch the virus during this winter.

In which country?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Que on December 20, 2021, 01:06:00 PM
So....London - thanks to the British "let the virus rip" strategy - is going to be the test case for the rest of Europe...

Sofar "the vast majority" of people in Intensive Care is unvaccinated. Amongst them "a troubling amount" of pregnant women. All unvaccinated are likely to catch the virus during this winter.

Any more questions?  ::)

Two other key points - 50% of the omicron hospitalisations in London are incidental, they are in hospital not because of covid, and were diagnosed after being admitted. And the London hospitalisations figure is not soaring. London is ahead of the rest of the UK by a couple of weeks - I won't show you the omicron data but it doesn't make me feel comfortable catching the tube!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on December 20, 2021, 08:49:10 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 08:45:27 AMIt may not be realistic to enforce "higher quality, well-fitting face coverings" with the general public -- at least if that means medical grade masks. There's a lot of devil in the detail there. What quality is higher quality? How well fitting is well-fitting?  They're likely to be expensive and uncomfortable . . .

A simple medical grade mask (a disposable multi-layer paper surgical mask) costs about $0.25. I've already made the colossal investment of upgrading from my simple cloth masks. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 20, 2021, 08:49:10 PM
A simple medical grade mask (a disposable multi-layer paper surgical mask) costs about $0.25. I've already made the colossal investment of upgrading from my simple cloth masks. :)

So $70 a year per person, if one a day. Likely more than that because likely more than one a day. That's a lot of money for a large part of the population in Europe and, from what I read, in the States poverty is even deeper than here.  People won't do it because they can't do it.  I bet business will vigorously resist offering them for free at the point of entry.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 20, 2021, 11:30:27 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 20, 2021, 01:14:47 PM
Two other key points - 50% of the omicron hospitalisations in London are incidental, they are in hospital not because of covid, and were diagnosed after being admitted. And the London hospitalisations figure is not soaring. London is ahead of the rest of the UK by a couple of weeks - I won't show you the omicron data but it doesn't make me feel comfortable catching the tube!

You mean omicron might be milder. On this I've read various theories. South Africa has a relatively young population that is therefore less affected. Another possibility is that although a previous episode of Covid or vaccination doesn't sufficiently protect against catching and developing the disease, it might make a difference in severity and prevent hospitalisation.

I'm sure we'll learn more in the weeks to come.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 21, 2021, 12:16:06 AM
Quote from: Que on December 20, 2021, 11:30:27 PM
You mean omicron might be milder. On this I've read various theories. South Africa has a relatively young population that is therefore less affected. Another possibility is that although a previous episode of Covid or vaccination doesn't sufficiently protect against catching and developing the disease, it might make a difference in severity and prevent hospitalisation.

I'm sure we'll learn more in the weeks to come.

Yes, and that's what makes it so hard to know the best thing to do. I think that we will learn a lot in a couple of weeks - right now there are a hell of a lot of omicron cases in London, we'll see how that's showing up in morbidity by the end of the year. Keep your fingers crossed, light a candle, say a prayer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 21, 2021, 03:07:16 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 20, 2021, 11:25:09 AM
Trump got his booster, after Fox News goaded him to knock boosters


By Aaron Blake
Senior reporter
Today at 2:01 p.m. EST

If you want a case-in-point of how coronavirus vaccine skepticism gets seeded on the right, you'd struggle to do better than former president Donald Trump's August interview on Fox News.

And Trump's new disclosure that he got his booster reinforces it.

To recap: Trump said in a new conversation with Bill O'Reilly that he has gotten his coronavirus booster. This follows on Trump having relatively frequently encouraged people to get the vaccine — even as he initially declined to do so and didn't disclose getting vaccinated while in the White House. (The news only leaked out in March.)

Trump saying this is particularly important given the current natural-immunity push on the right; Trump was infected with the coronavirus in October 2020. Since then, he got the vaccine and a booster.

But for a moment in August, the Trump was goaded into seriously questioning the same booster he now says he has gotten.

Trump said early in the interview with ally Maria Bartiromo that people should get the vaccine — in arguably stronger terms than he had before.

"I recommend that people take it," he said, before stressing that people should have the choice.

Trump added: "Now one thing: When you have the vaccine, people that do — and it's a very small number relatively, but people that do get it — get better much quicker. And it's very important to know. They don't get nearly as sick, and they get better. [Sen.] Lindsey Graham is an example. He said, if I didn't have this vaccine, I would have died."

"So once you get the vaccine, you get better," Trump added.

Bartiromo, though, quickly took the conversation back to boosters, after Trump initially ignored her question about whether he would get one. And she helpfully suggested that maybe his answer on boosters might be different.

"It's a great point," she said, "but I still come back to the idea — I still come back to the idea of a booster shot. I mean, yes, you are right, the vaccines work — "

The clear subtext: I mean, the vaccines work, but what about this other thing?

Trump took the cue. He quickly suggested that maybe — just maybe — the boosters were actually a "moneymaking operation for Pfizer."

"Think of the money involved," he said, adding: "The whole thing is just crazy. It doesn't — you wouldn't think you would need a booster. You know, when these first came out, they were good for life."

That idea that the vaccines were "good for life" was never assumed to be true, but the fact that Trump was talking in these terms furthered the cause of vaccine skepticism. And he very much seemed to be giving Bartiromo the kind of answer that she wanted.

Trump's disclosure Sunday that he got the booster reinforces that even this man who declined to initially tell people to get vaccinated, who got a natural infection, and who questioned the push for boosters has now gotten one himself. That's arguably the biggest point — that this paragon of a Republican Party that remains so vaccine-resistant has taken the next step, despite his personal skepticism.

But the big point, when it comes to how that broader skepticism became what it is today, is how Trump was pulled into saying what he did in August. Here was a guy asked about the booster and who hailed the benefits of the vaccines in response. But that wasn't the answer that was desired. And Trump, mindful of catering to his base, obliged with a highly conspiratorial message that maybe the boosters were just a Big Pharma money-grab.

To Trump's credit, he has — however infrequently and delayed — continued to point to the benefits of vaccination and now boosters. He has done so even as other prominent conservatives have wagered that dancing around their booster status (Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis) or vaccination status (Tucker Carlson) or hailing their unvaccinated status (Sarah Palin) is the way to go.

He also did so even after getting booed for it, which happened at a rally shortly after his Bartiromo interview. That shouldn't get lost in all of this, and it continues to be a wonder someone hasn't bankrolled a TV ad playing Trump's repeated comments endorsing vaccination.

But the larger procedural point is why Trump, in delivering his comments, again got jeered by the O'Reilly audience. "Don't, don't, don't, don't," Trump said in response, assuring: "It's a very tiny group over there."

While it might be a tiny group that is bold enough to jeer their hero, it's hardly a tiny group that is feeding them what they and others who are vaccine-reluctant want to hear — often relying upon the kind of innuendo Trump was convinced to traffic in back in August.
That would be smart:  someone (Why not Trump himself?) paying for an ad for him to encourage others to get vaccinated.  I did see the clip of him getting booed on t.v.  Disgusted to hear about his interview with Maria Bartiromo and how that went.  >:(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 21, 2021, 04:42:01 AM
The musician Brian May has since come down with a nasty case of Covid (despite being triple-jabbed).  He and his wife took a chance and went to a daytime birthday luncheon with friends.  He's now urging his fans to get jabbed (via Instagram).

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/entertainment/brian-may-covid-intl-scli/index.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 06:04:29 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 21, 2021, 03:07:16 AM
That would be smart:  someone (Why not Trump himself?) paying for an ad for him to encourage others to get vaccinated.  I did see the clip of him getting booed on t.v.  Disgusted to hear about his interview with Maria Bartiromo and how that went.  >:(

PD

Don't even need Putin-grade puppeteer expertise to pull the wankmaggot dotard's strings!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 07:49:03 AM
Baker announces indoor mask advisory for Mass., activates National Guard to help hospitals with COVID-19 surge
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 08:08:56 AM
City's vaccine mandate a path back to normal

If it takes the incentive of a movie or a burger and a beer for the unvaccinated to comply, then bring it on.

By The [Boston Globe] Editorial Board Updated December 21, 2021, 4:00 a.m.

When lives are on the line, difficult decisions are made easier.

Make no mistake, the COVID-19 vaccine mandate Boston Mayor Michelle Wu announced Monday for a host of new indoor venues and for all city employees was no political walk in the park. And as if to prove the point, a loud gaggle of anti-vax demonstrators gathered to protest the move at City Hall even as Wu was introducing it.

But when hospitalizations are rising — up 89 percent compared to two weeks ago — and the city is averaging 369 new cases a day, it's the responsible move. Along with the city's mask mandate and increasing opportunities for people to be tested for the virus, vaccination requirements are a necessary part of the city's toolkit.

Skeptics have only to look at the even more difficult decisions being made across Europe where lockdowns have either been ordered (the Netherlands) or are on the table (Britain).

And closer to home, universities and teams in the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association are already wrestling with COVID-related shutdowns and cancellations.

In Boston the vast majority of COVID-related hospitalizations are among the unvaccinated, the mayor noted.

"Our essential workers have been on the front lines of fighting this pandemic for more than 650 days," Wu said. "And it's time for Boston to follow the science and public health data to ease their burden and to take the big steps that we can to help close vaccination gaps."

She acknowledged that "this is just one step," adding, "but given where we are at this moment, it's a necessary one."

And so, beginning Jan. 15, all patrons and employees of indoor restaurants and bars, gyms and fitness centers, and entertainment, recreational, and event venues will have to show proof of at least the first round of vaccination. That gets bumped up to proof of full (two-shot) vaccination on Feb. 15 for those age 12 and over. The policy will apply to children ages 5-11 for the first dose on March 1 and sets May 1 for full vaccination.

Given that only 30 percent of the city's 5- to 11-year-olds are vaccinated, as Dr. Bisola Ojikutu, executive director of the Boston Public Health Commission, put it Monday, "We can and we must do better than this."

When New York City implemented its vaccine mandate for indoor venues, vaccinations rose by 9 percent in one month, she added.

Boston is also ending its dual policy for city workers, which had allowed some to opt for testing instead of vaccination. Full vaccination on the same timetable "will be a condition of employment for the City of Boston," Wu said, adding that about 90 percent of the city's workforce is already vaccinated.

Many of the city's largest entertainment and sports venues and at least a handful of restaurants have already implemented their own vax-mandate policies as a way of bringing patrons back and making them feel safer. But the city's new policy will level that playing field, adding movie theaters, bowling alleys, and party and event spaces to the mix.

The mayor also promises a new app in the days ahead to make it more convenient to show that newly important proof of vaccination.

But there is still the Christmas and New Year season to get through, and even by Jan. 15 indoor dining will come with no ironclad guarantees of being risk-free.

A public health order is not a magic wand; it will not make the dangers of COVID disappear in the new year.

The key to making the policy work — for as many people in this state as possible — is extending its reach. With a governor who refuses to implement a state-wide mask mandate [Gov. Baker announced an indoor mask advisory today—kh], extending an indoor vaccine mandate statewide seems even more unlikely.

So the kind of regional compact Wu has begun to build remains the next best option. After all, public health emergencies don't end at the Boston line or the Charles River. So it's important that officials from Cambridge, Brookline, Arlington, Medford, Salem, and Somerville have all committed to bringing their communities on board with similar policies, and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council has stepped up to work with cities and towns within the region on implementation.

"This is not about anyone's conveniences," Somerville Mayor Joe Curtatone said at Monday's news conference. "It's the unvaccinated who are killing us right now. . . . How many more lives will we have to lose?"

Absent that magic wand, Wu has managed to strike a balance with a policy that is practical without being punitive, that provides one more incentive for the unvaccinated to do the right thing, even if it's only to be able to go to a movie or have a burger and a beer out with friends.

The promise of a return to something approaching normal — which seemed within reach last spring — has proved more elusive in recent days. Vaccine mandates can bring us further along on that path.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 21, 2021, 10:17:42 AM
So, we're going to lock down every time there is a new mutation of the virus? So much for learning to live with it. At this rate we will be locked down for decades.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 21, 2021, 10:26:01 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 21, 2021, 10:17:42 AM
So, we're going to lock down every time there is a new mutation of the virus? So much for learning to live with it. At this rate we will be locked down for decades.

That's obviously going to be dependent on the mutation itself, and the country, its population's susceptibility and health system. In England  we've decided that there's no reason for us to lockdown at the moment - the people who make the decisions believe that it's best to wait a few more days to get a better handle on how how dangerous omicron is.


One thing I would say is this: the evidence is that the English people (I haven't seen the data for other nations in the UK) are responding to information about omicron by restricting their own behaviour voluntarily - they're going to social events less, using public transport less, planning smaller Christmas gatherings etc. That's what happened in Sweden in 2020 if I remember correctly. It may just be that the best policy in some places is openness and trust, and that imposing lockdowns is needlessly, maybe damagingly, heavy handed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 21, 2021, 11:26:54 AM

     Moderna could be ready to develop Omicron booster in weeks (https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-could-be-ready-develop-omicron-booster-weeks-ceo-2021-12-21/)

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 11:28:53 AM
Opinion: The real reason the right hates Anthony Fauci (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/12/21/why-the-right-hates-fauci/)

By Paul Waldman
Columnist Today at 12:46 p.m. EST

The next time someone says Fox is a "news" organization, you might want to recall this moment, when one of the network's stars tells activists to find and confront Fauci, "go in for the kill shot" of what he thinks is a clever question ("Boom! He is dead!") and then "get that footage to us" so it can be used against him.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 11:34:18 AM
Unvaccinated Houston man's death may be first attributed to omicron in U.S.

By Annabelle Timsit and Lateshia Beachum Today at 6:56 a.m. EST

An unvaccinated Houston-area man in his 50s is the first recorded fatality associated with the omicron variant in the Texas county — and may be the first U.S. death publicly attributed to it.

The man, who tested positive for the omicron variant before his death, according to Harris County Public Health (HCPC), had previously been infected with the coronavirus and had underlying health conditions that made him particularly vulnerable.

State and county officials renewed calls for people to get fully vaccinated and boosted as the best protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death, including illness caused by omicron.

"This is a reminder of the severity of COVID-19 and its variants," Barbie Robinson, HCPH executive director, said of the Harris County man's death in a news release. "We urge all residents who qualify to get vaccinated and get their booster shot if they have not already."

According to the Texas Department of State Health Services, 73.3 percent of eligible county residents have had at least one coronavirus vaccine dose, leaving more than a quarter without any protection.

"Please get vaccinated and boosted," Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo tweeted.

The United States has been inundated by the omicron variant, which was discovered in southern Africa last month and has led to tightened restrictions in much of the world.

The World Health Organization said last week that the variant has been recorded in 89 countries and that the number of cases associated with it is doubling every 1½ to three days in areas where the variant is spreading in the community.

In England, 14 people have died of the coronavirus as tests showed they were positive for the omicron variant.

Omicron could cause less severe disease than its predecessors among those who are fully vaccinated and boosted, public health experts say, but the more transmissible variant may make rapid inroads through unvaccinated populations and overwhelm hospitals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 12:03:31 PM
The Omicron Best-Case and Worst-Case Scenarios (https://www.thebulwark.com/the-omicron-best-case-and-worst-case-scenarios/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 21, 2021, 12:06:28 PM
Quote from: drogulus on December 21, 2021, 11:26:54 AM
     Moderna could be ready to develop Omicron booster in weeks (https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-could-be-ready-develop-omicron-booster-weeks-ceo-2021-12-21/)

   

Don't hold your breath. If we really need one of those it sounds like it'll be a long hard 2022 waiting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 21, 2021, 01:40:29 PM
Finally had my booster vaccine today (Moderna). I was easily the oldest there - the others were the technology savvy youngsters who had snapped up all the appointments. Apparently there are 100,000 over 65 year olds (like me) who are not 'refuseniks' but who have simply been unable to book an appointment. I had to drive some distance to the nearest vaccine centre where I could get an appointment. Because I had a booked appointment I only had to wait 5-10 minutes in the queue and not for 4 hours for a 'walk-in' appointment. I had to wait 15 mins in the car afterwards to check that I was ok. Felt very tired and a bit disorientated and spaced out but am told that is my normal state  ;D. Feel fine now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 01:50:09 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 21, 2021, 01:40:29 PM
Finally had my booster vaccine today (Moderna). I was easily the oldest there - the others were the technology savvy youngsters who had snapped up all the appointments. Apparently there are 100,000 over 65 year olds (like me) who are not 'refuseniks' but who have simply been unable to book an appointment. I had to drive some distance to the nearest vaccine centre where I could get an appointment. Because I had a booked appointment I only had to wait 5-10 minutes in the queue and not for 4 hours for a 'walk-in' appointment. I had to wait 15 mins in the car afterwards to check that I was ok. Felt very tired and a bit disorientated and spaced out but am told that is my normal state  ;D. Feel fine now.

Good on ya, mate!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 21, 2021, 01:54:00 PM
Jennifer Rubin: While [Biden] did not say it directly, rising case numbers among vaccinated Americans are less meaningful than ever. For a fully vaccinated and boosted person who tests positive but has virtually no symptoms, covid-19 is not much different from other contagious respiratory ailments. The real threat lies among the unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 21, 2021, 02:08:29 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 21, 2021, 01:50:09 PM
Good on ya, mate!
Thank you my friend!  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 21, 2021, 05:52:50 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 21, 2021, 01:40:29 PM
Finally had my booster vaccine today (Moderna). I was easily the oldest there - the others were the technology savvy youngsters who had snapped up all the appointments. Apparently there are 100,000 over 65 year olds (like me) who are not 'refuseniks' but who have simply been unable to book an appointment. I had to drive some distance to the nearest vaccine centre where I could get an appointment. Because I had a booked appointment I only had to wait 5-10 minutes in the queue and not for 4 hours for a 'walk-in' appointment. I had to wait 15 mins in the car afterwards to check that I was ok. Felt very tired and a bit disorientated and spaced out but am told that is my normal state  ;D. Feel fine now.

Good to hear you are "boostered" Jeffrey! My booster shot will be no sooner than February 7th which is disappointing. There just isn't enough personel to give jabs quicker and now they are also vaccinating the kids in panic... ...so it is what it is...  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 21, 2021, 10:53:33 PM
PCR daily testing capacity of 3-4% of the population here in DK is not really enough now; you'll have to wait 6-7 days for one, also because of the Christmas buzz, of course. You'll need to take the sketchier quick tests in stead. So mapping the situation becomes more difficult also.

Having what is very likely just a minor cold, I'll be taking three quick-tests in four days in stead, and then have to decide, whether I'll be joining the family, which includes vulnerable people. The 1st on Monday was negative, but they only identify 55% of cases. Cancelled the dentist yesterday. I've also booked a PCR for the 27th. Yet, if it's that mild, I actually hope for that it's positive, but it probably isn't.

Omicron symptoms are often mild and like a cold, not with breathing problems or loss of taste/smell etc. In the Norwegian Christmas party, now surveyed, more than 50% experienced, and starting with the most common,

- coughing (83%)
- a wet nose
- tiredness
- throat pain
- muscle pain
- fever (54%)

Hospitalizations are still very much in the lower end, less than 0.5%, and apparently less than 5 ICU from about 25,000 infected. By far, the biggest numbers of infections belong only to the most recent days, however.

Another presser now scheduled for today, probably due to bad predictions for January.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on December 22, 2021, 12:27:03 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on December 21, 2021, 05:52:50 PM
Good to hear you are "boostered" Jeffrey! My booster shot will be no sooner than February 7th which is disappointing. There just isn't enough personel to give jabs quicker and now they are also vaccinating the kids in panic... ...so it is what it is...  :-\
Thank you 71 dB  :)
Slightly sore arm this morning, but otherwise fine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 22, 2021, 03:38:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 21, 2021, 10:53:33 PM
PCR daily testing capacity of 3-4% of the population here in DK is not really enough now; you'll have to wait 6-7 days for one, also because of the Christmas buzz, of course. You'll need to take the sketchier quick tests in stead. So mapping the situation becomes more difficult also.

Having what is very likely just a minor cold, I'll be taking three quick-tests in four days in stead, and then have to decide, whether I'll be joining the family, which includes vulnerable people. The 1st on Monday was negative, but they only identify 55% of cases. Cancelled the dentist yesterday. I've also booked a PCR for the 27th. Yet, if it's that mild, I actually hope for that it's positive, but it probably isn't.

Omicron symptoms are often mild and like a cold, not with breathing problems or loss of taste/smell etc. In the Norwegian Christmas party, now surveyed, more than 50% experienced, and starting with the most common,

- coughing (83%)
- a wet nose
- tiredness
- throat pain
- muscle pain
- fever (54%)

Hospitalizations are still very much in the lower end, less than 0.5%, and apparently less than 5 ICU from about 25,000 infected. By far, the biggest numbers of infections belong only to the most recent days, however.

Another presser now scheduled for today, probably due to bad predictions for January.
Sorry to hear that you are not feeling well MT.  Hoping for the best for you and warm chicken soup thoughts your way.

Quote from: vandermolen on December 22, 2021, 12:27:03 AM
Thank you 71 dB  :)
Slightly sore arm this morning, but otherwise fine.
Well done Jeffrey!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 05:15:10 AM
SA scientists confirm Omicron cases are less severe than Delta (https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-12-22-sa-scientists-confirm-omicron-cases-are-less-severe-than-delta/)

Omicron causes less-severe illness than the earlier Delta variant of Covid-19, a South African study has found.

The results thereof, available in a preprint, show people infected with Omicron have an 80% lower chance of being admitted to hospital.

However, those who are admitted have no significantly lower chance of experiencing severe disease, co-author Prof Cheryl Cohen said during a National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) media briefing on Wednesday.

"We can't tell from this data how much is from vaccination, previous infection or the intrinsic reduced virulence of the virus. This is because most previous infections are not diagnosed," said Cohen, who leads the NICD respiratory diseases unit.

"However, in SA Omicron is behaving in a way that is less severe and this is likely to be the same in sub-Saharan African countries with similar very high levels of previous infection.

"What is unclear is whether the picture will be similar in countries with high levels of vaccination, but very low levels of previous infection."

Cohen said the sharp increases in hospitalisations in Europe and the US were probably due to it being winter there, the fact that immunity is due more to vaccinations than the more robust protection provided by previous infection and an older age profile.


(emphasis mine)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 22, 2021, 05:52:00 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on December 21, 2021, 01:40:29 PM
Finally had my booster vaccine today (Moderna). I was easily the oldest there - the others were the technology savvy youngsters who had snapped up all the appointments. Apparently there are 100,000 over 65 year olds (like me) who are not 'refuseniks' but who have simply been unable to book an appointment. I had to drive some distance to the nearest vaccine centre where I could get an appointment. Because I had a booked appointment I only had to wait 5-10 minutes in the queue and not for 4 hours for a 'walk-in' appointment. I had to wait 15 mins in the car afterwards to check that I was ok. Felt very tired and a bit disorientated and spaced out but am told that is my normal state  ;D. Feel fine now.

Same here, had my Moderna booster shot yesterday. Since I had an appointment I didn't wait, actually was ushered in 5 mins ahead of schedule. Just a bit of soreness on the injection site.

My wife, who went to see her family in Belgium last month developed covid once back here. She may have been infected on the return flight. Stuffed nose, loss of smell and taste, but she's fine now. Had she not been double-vaccinated I believe she would have developed a worse case of the disease.

Health authorities here limit the number of house gatherings to 10 people on Dec 24 and 25. That'll be reduced as of the 26th. We went from less than 1000 cases 2 weeks ago to over 6000 today for a population of 8.5 Mi.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM
I have just become eligible for a booster, alas it won't be possible to schedule it until the first week of January.

I am amazed to see large scale lock-downs suggested. Our civilization can't continue with large scale lock downs, and especially school closures. The lockdowns were necessary and effective measures to slow the progress of the pandemic and keep health care systems from collapsing until a vaccine could be developed. Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 06:05:19 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 21, 2021, 10:53:33 PM

Omicron symptoms are often mild and like a cold, not with breathing problems or loss of taste/smell etc. In the Norwegian Christmas party, now surveyed, more than 50% experienced, and starting with the most common,

But note that the average age of the participants was only 36.

Ullum from SSI on the just finished press conference said that the preliminary data from Denmark seem to indicate that there is no obvious clinical difference between infections with Omikron, Alfa or Delta variants.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:08:34 AM
Germany, 2021 AD

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGsDWKLXwAMJyUu?format=png&name=900x900)

Don't Buy from the Unvaccinated!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGsJ8knXMAUgo1D?format=png&name=900x900)

Gas the Unvaccinated!

Any resemblance to past historical events is probably purely coincidental but the mere fact that some deranged minds could even think of that is deeply disturbing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 06:27:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:08:34 AM
Any resemblance to past historical events is probably purely coincidental ..

Nor do I think the comparison holds true. The hate against the Jews was not only abominable but also absurd because the Jews were socially conscious people who contributed to Germany's intellectual and technological development, whereas the vaccine opponents today are antisocial people by heart who disregard the fact that their unvaccinated status is directly harmful to the rest of us and to society as a whole. Aggression against antivaxers is therefore understandable, but the way it is expressed in the pictures above is of course detestable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:33:48 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM
I am amazed to see large scale lock-downs suggested. Our civilization can't continue with large scale lock downs, and especially school closures. The lockdowns were necessary and effective measures to slow the progress of the pandemic and keep health care systems from collapsing until a vaccine could be developed. Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.

It is indeed astonishing and even a bit scary to see counries with very high vaccination rates and effective early teatment schemes getting again into a lockdown & restrictions frenzy. If vaccines work in greatly reducing the risk of hospitalization and death and antivirals are widely available for early treatment then why this panic any more?

Actually, this panic and frenzy is specific to the EU and parts of the USA. The rest of the world, including their media, have a more relaxed and rational approach, and they are not even half as vaccinated as the Western world. Why this is so I won't venture to speculate on. I just notice the fact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:34:25 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 06:27:23 AMAggression against antivaxers is therefore understandable


Not really.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:43:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:33:48 AMActually, this panic and frenzy is specific to the EU and parts of the USA.


It is bizarre and humorous to watch the panic.  I have multiple family members that work for a massive healthcare delivery company, one at an administrative level, and the information I get from them on the current state of delivery and shortages (or lack thereof) are at odds with what the press reports.  Starkly so in some cases.  I know this is both anecdotal and localized, but it is not possible to believe press stories about the current situation when one has access to published data available directly from public health authorities and first-hand experience from health care professionals. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 06:44:35 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM
Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.

The vaccines are not as efficient as we thought they would be, because they for obvious reasons were not directed towards the omikron variant in the first hand. And the omikron is so contagious, that a relatively high degree of restrictions are necessary to prevent "wild" spreading due to the fact, that a large part of the population is unvaccinated and the fact that omikron very often infects people who have been vaccinated against the alfa variant or earlier infected by the alfa or delta variant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 06:52:00 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:34:25 AM

Not really.

Would you mind to elaborate?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:54:42 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 06:52:00 AM
Would you mind to elaborate?


Aggression is not understandable. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:54:50 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 06:27:23 AM
the vaccine opponents today are antisocial people by heart

You paint with a wide brush. Very wide, actually.

Quotewho disregard the fact that their unvaccinated status is directly harmful to the rest of us and to society as a whole.

Given the recent evolutions which have shown beyond dispute that vaccines can greatly reduce the hospitalizations and deaths but they cannot greatly reduce the infections (heck, highly vaccinated countries witness an alarming surge of infections and therefore go into a locdown & restrictions frenzy), the sentence above is factually incorrect and unnecessarily inflamed. Sorry, I can't put it any milder than that.

Let me ask you a question: suppose a close relative, or a good friend of yours is unvaccinated. Would you cut all direct contacts with them?

QuoteAggression against antivaxers is therefore understandable,

Of course. Any irrational behavior becomes understandable when driven by fear, especially induced fear.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 06:57:01 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 05:15:10 AM
SA scientists confirm Omicron cases are less severe than Delta (https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-12-22-sa-scientists-confirm-omicron-cases-are-less-severe-than-delta/)

Omicron causes less-severe illness than the earlier Delta variant of Covid-19, a South African study has found.

The results thereof, available in a preprint, show people infected with Omicron have an 80% lower chance of being admitted to hospital.

However, those who are admitted have no significantly lower chance of experiencing severe disease, co-author Prof Cheryl Cohen said during a National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) media briefing on Wednesday.

"We can't tell from this data how much is from vaccination, previous infection or the intrinsic reduced virulence of the virus. This is because most previous infections are not diagnosed," said Cohen, who leads the NICD respiratory diseases unit.

"However, in SA Omicron is behaving in a way that is less severe and this is likely to be the same in sub-Saharan African countries with similar very high levels of previous infection.

"What is unclear is whether the picture will be similar in countries with high levels of vaccination, but very low levels of previous infection."

Cohen said the sharp increases in hospitalisations in Europe and the US were probably due to it being winter there, the fact that immunity is due more to vaccinations than the more robust protection provided by previous infection and an older age profile.


(emphasis mine)


The key sentence is in the preprint

QuoteSome of this reducton is likely a result of high population immunity.

In other words, the study shows that the SA population is less likely to get severely ill with omicron now than they were with delta before, because they have some immunity - they caught delta and recovered. It does not show that omicron is less likely to cause severe disease than delta in an arbitrary population, because of an intrinsic property of the virus.

So we in the UK, to take an example close to my heart, cannot use the study to argue that omicron will be less likely to make a Brit go to hospital than delta. Our delta epidemic was already mitigated by vaccine based immunity.

(This reads back like gobbledygook, sorry!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:06:09 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:43:24 AM

It is bizarre and humorous to watch the panic.  I have multiple family members that work for a massive healthcare delivery company, one at an administrative level, and the information I get from them on the current state of delivery and shortages (or lack thereof) are at odds with what the press reports.  Starkly so in some cases.  I know this is both anecdotal and localized, but it is not possible to believe press stories about the current situation when one has access to published data available directly from public health authorities and first-hand experience from health care professionals.

Yes, I'm convinced the Western media, Romanian included, have greatly contributed to amplifying the panic and fear to almost hysterical levels. I have multiple family members living in three countries spread over two continents (Europe and Africa) so my evidence is also anecdotal and localized, but entirely in line with your own.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 07:07:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:08:34 AM
Germany, 2021 AD

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGsDWKLXwAMJyUu?format=png&name=900x900)

Don't Buy from the Unvaccinated!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGsJ8knXMAUgo1D?format=png&name=900x900)

Gas the Unvaccinated!

Any resemblance to past historical events is probably purely coincidental but the mere fact that some deranged minds could even think of that is deeply disturbing.

When I was a child British people used to say about the Nazis, the concentration camps "it couldn't happen here." As a teenager I used to laugh at them, I argued they were complacent, I used to say that it could well have happened here, that British people were no less racist, no less anti-Jewish, no less intolerant than Germans, French etc. And no less willing to use strong arm tactics.

However, looking at how the covid pandemic is evolving from a social point of view, I'm not so sure I was right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:16:50 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 06:57:01 AM
In other words, the study shows that the SA population is less likely to get severely ill with omicron now than they were with delta before, because they have some immunity - they caught delta and recovered. It does not show that omicron is less likely to cause severe disease than delta in an arbitrary population, because of an intrinsic property of the virus.

So we in the UK, to take an example close to my heart, cannot use the study to argue that omicron will be less likely to make a Brit go to hospital than delta. Our delta epidemic was already mitigated by vaccine based immunity.

(This reads back like gobbledygook, sorry!)

Oh, no, you're right and that Cohen lady said it explicitly.

I think the good news reported in the study is mainly for nations with a high degree of natural immunity, ie a high percentage of the population got Covid in whatever variant and recxovered, either officially registered or not. Happily, Romania is among them. A recent British study estimated tha a full 70% of our population got Covid and recovered. Add to this the 40% who are vaccinated, allow for the overlap between the two categories and we can conclude that at least 60-70% of Romanians have developed some form of immunity. I'd day thjis bodes well for the future, but only time will tell. What is known as a fact is that Romania is right now the only EU country where the infections are way below the 3-per-thousand threshold --- the only green country in a sea of red ones.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 07:22:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 06:54:50 AM
Given the recent evolutions which have shown beyond dispute that vaccines can greatly reduce the hospitalizations and deaths but they cannot greatly reduce the infections (heck, highly vaccinated countries witness an alarming surge of infections and therefore go into a locdown & restrictions frenzy), the sentence above is factually incorrect and unnecessarily inflamed. Sorry, I can't put it any milder than that.

Firstly: The vaccines can to a large degree reduce infections. It's true that vaccinated people also spread the virus when infected but they do this in a shorter period and to a lesser degree. Therefore the interest the society has got in getting all people vaccinated making them less contagious to the vulnerable group of the society.

Secondly: The vaccines reduce to some extent clinical disease. This means that unvaccinated people get more ill when infected and will need hospitalisation more often. This may by itself become a large burden upon the hospitals, which will affect the treatment of other diseases eg. of vaccinated people.

Quote from: Florestan
Let me ask you a question: suppose a close relative, or a good friend of yours is unvaccinated. Would you cut all direct contacts with them?

I would have to, but only physical contact of course. I belong to the ultravulnerable group with a high risk of serious disease if I get infected.

Quote from: Florestan
Of course. Any irrational behavior becomes understandable when driven by fear, especially induced fear.

Its too easy to talk about fear. It's reality.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 07:07:29 AM
When I was a child British people used to say about the Nazis, the concentration camps "it couldn't happen here." As a teenager I used to laugh at them, I argued they were complacent, I used to say that it could well have happened here, that British people were no less racist, no less anti-Jewish, no less intolerant than Germans, French etc.

However, looking at how the covid pandemic is evolving from a social point of view, I'm not so sure I was right.

I'd say that given the right moment, the right opportunity and the right propaganda, totalitarianism can happen everywhere --- it's only that for several reasons some countries are a more fertile ground for it than others.

And actually concentration camps are just a subset of totalitarian policies and not even a mandatory one. Nothing of the sort ever existed in Communist Romania.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on December 22, 2021, 07:36:20 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 06:27:23 AM
whereas the vaccine opponents today are antisocial people by heart who disregard the fact that their unvaccinated status is directly harmful to the rest of us and to society as a whole. Aggression against antivaxers is therefore understandable,
No, dude... just no...

I will be fair and mention that I think being vehemently against them (no the mandates, the vaccines) is probably a bit dumb. Maybe some of the most extremist people are antisocial.

And another thought, not directed at you, since I do see the distinction in your post.
Unvaxxed and antivaxxers are different groups, even if there is some overlap. Probably important for people to be extra careful in how they conceive of these two groups. Unvaxxed are mostly not antisocial.
(just wanted to mention that even though that isn't what you are saying. Unjumbling these groups is a good thing.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 07:39:35 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:30:25 AMI'd say that given the right moment, the right opportunity and the right propaganda, totalitarianism can happen everywhere


See, from an American perspective, I'm not concerned about totalitarianism.  Nah, here we could end up with a new form of segregation based on public health policy.  If you ain't got the right kind of card, you can't enter certain establishments.  We don't serve your kind. That kind of thing.  (The fact that certain minority communities remain disproportionately less vaccinated is purely coincidental.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 07:46:22 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 22, 2021, 03:38:02 AM
Sorry to hear that you are not feeling well MT.  Hoping for the best for you and warm chicken soup thoughts your way.
(...)

Thank you, it sounds nice with the soup. My 2nd test was negative too, and I'll probably be totally fine in a couple of days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 07:47:53 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 07:22:38 AM
Firstly: The vaccines can to a large degree reduce infections. It's true that vaccinated people also spread the virus when infected but they do this in a shorter period and to a lesser degree. Therefore the interest the society has got in getting all people vaccinated making them less contagious to the vulnerable group of the society.

Secondly: The vaccines reduce to some extent clinical disease. This means that unvaccinated people get more ill when infected and will need hospitalisation more often. This may by itself become a large burden upon the hospitals, which will affect the treatment of other diseases eg. of vaccinated people.

I would have to, but only physical contact of course. I belong to the ultravulnerable group with a high risk of serious disease if I get infected.

Its too easy to talk about fear. It's reality.

Obvious facts. I appreciate that DK avoided excess mortality so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 07:49:58 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 06:52:00 AM
Would you mind to elaborate?

God bless you, my friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:51:58 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 07:22:38 AM
The vaccines can to a large degree reduce infections. It's true that vaccinated people also spread the virus when infected but they do this in a shorter period and to a lesser degree.

Then how comes that highly vaccinated countries witness an alarming surge in infections, so alarming that they have to go the lockdown way yet again?

QuoteTherefore the interest the society has got in getting all people vaccinated making them less contagious to the vulnerable group of the society.

If I remember correctly, all countries started the vaccination precisely with the vulnerable goups of society. Are you telling me the vaccines don't actually protect them?

QuoteThe vaccines reduce to some extent clinical disease.

This is not what he have been told in the beginning. We have been told "Get vaccinated in order to return to normal life!" We have been lied to, don't you think?


QuoteThis means that unvaccinated people get more ill when infected and will need hospitalisation more often.

How about unvaccinated people who have got Covid and recovered? Is their naturally-acquired immunity to be overlooked or downright negated? How about unvaccinated people who never ever had Covid? Is their innate immunity to be overlooked or downright negated?

What you suggest amounts to a presumption of guilt regarding the unvaccinated which is utterly unacceptable.

QuoteThis may by itself become a large burden upon the hospitals, which will affect the treatment of other diseases eg. of vaccinated people.

So what do you propose? To have the underclass of unvaccinated denied treatment?

QuoteI would have to, but only physical contact of course. I belong to the ultravulnerable group with a high risk of serious disease if I get infected.

I'm sorry to hear that and I hope you stay safe all the time. But in this caes you should beware of vaccinated people as well --- actually, you should get in direct contact only with people whio have tested negative --- which is the only way to tell who is infected and who is not with some degree of accuracy.

Quote
Its too easy to talk about fear. It's reality.

Fear is part iof reality.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 07:53:15 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 07:22:38 AM
Firstly: The vaccines can to a large degree reduce infections. It's true that vaccinated people also spread the virus when infected but they do this in a shorter period and to a lesser degree. Therefore the interest the society has got in getting all people vaccinated making them less contagious to the vulnerable group of the society.

Secondly: The vaccines reduce to some extent clinical disease. This means that unvaccinated people get more ill when infected and will need hospitalisation more often. This may by itself become a large burden upon the hospitals, which will affect the treatment of other diseases eg. of vaccinated people.

I would have to, but only physical contact of course. I belong to the ultravulnerable group with a high risk of serious disease if I get infected.

Its too easy to talk about fear. It's reality.

All sober good sense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 07:53:48 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 07:46:22 AM
Thank you, it sounds nice with the soup. My 2nd test was negative too, and I'll probably be totally fine in a couple of days.

Mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 07:59:41 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 06:54:42 AM

Aggression is not understandable.

Maybe I should add, that I didn't think of physical aggression, which of course isn't understandable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:59:58 AM
Quote from: greg on December 22, 2021, 07:36:20 AM
Unvaxxed and antivaxxers are different groups, even if there is some overlap.

A crucial distinction, thanks for making it.

QuoteProbably important for people to be extra careful in how they conceive of these two groups. Unvaxxed are mostly not antisocial.

Amen, brother!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 08:00:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 07:46:22 AM
Thank you, it sounds nice with the soup. My 2nd test was negative too, and I'll probably be totally fine in a couple of days.

Good to hear. So probably not corona.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 08:01:19 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:51:58 AMThen how comes that highly vaccinated countries witness an alarming surge in infections, so alarming that they have to go the lockdown way yet again?


Vaccines will, it is hoped, prevent death and serious complications.  Current evidence indicates that is what happens.  Clearly vaccines cannot prevent the spread of the disease.  That's been known for a while.  Anecdotally, I had an employee who was fully vaccinated yet contracted Covid twice afterward, and that was months before omicron.  In the health care delivery company I cited earlier, "breakthrough" infections are common, and have been all year.  The benefits of vaccination are quite clear. 

This is, of course, entirely distinct from the self-righteous displays of people who now justify any and every expansion of state power in the name of public health.


Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:51:58 AMFear is part of reality.


As are rationales for "aggression".


Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 07:59:41 AMMaybe I should add, that I didn't think of physical aggression, which of course isn't understandable.


Public intimidation is just as bad. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 08:03:01 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 07:39:35 AM
here we could end up with a new form of segregation based on public health policy.  If you ain't got the right kind of card, you can't enter certain establishments.

It's already happening in the EU, Romania included.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 08:03:22 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 07:53:48 AM
Mend quickly!

Thanks!


Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 08:00:25 AM
Good to hear. So probably not corona.

Indeed, thank you. It's understandable BTW what you should choose to engage in here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 08:08:21 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 08:01:19 AM

Vaccines will, it is hoped, prevent death and serious complications.  Current evidence indicates that is what happens.  Clearly vaccines cannot prevent the spread of the disease.  That's been known for a while.  Anecdotally, I had an employee who was fully vaccinated yet contracted Covid twice afterward, and that was months before omicron.  In the health care delivery company I cited earlier, "breakthrough" infections are common, and have been all year.  The benefits of vaccination are quite clear. 

This is, of course, entirely distinct from the self-righteous displays of people who now justify any and every expansion of state power in the name of public health.

Aye.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 08:31:32 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 07:59:41 AM
Maybe I should add, that I didn't think of physical aggression, which of course isn't understandable.

Painting slogans on shop windows or walls is not physical aggression but their psychological effect is just as bad. And what guarantee do we have that some deranged people will not get from painting slogans to actual physical aggressions, especially with the demonization of unvaccinated going full speed and virtually unopposed in the media?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 08:31:49 AM
A little amusing, Andrei, that you did not highlight Huggy Bear's :  The benefits of vaccination are quite clear. The benefits of mandating vaccination are also quite clear. Decrying that as Big Brother is a self-righteous fantasy all its own. Why, perhsps it is even fear-mongering.

Separately, some good news: South Africa's huge omicron wave appears to be subsiding just as quickly as it grew

I wish I could say that suggests that US hospitals are not in danger of being over-stressed, but we cannot, in good reason, can we?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:38:39 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 07:39:35 AM

See, from an American perspective, I'm not concerned about totalitarianism.  Nah, here we could end up with a new form of segregation based on public health policy.  If you ain't got the right kind of card, you can't enter certain establishments.  We don't serve your kind. That kind of thing.  (The fact that certain minority communities remain disproportionately less vaccinated is purely coincidental.)

A sort of de facto apartheid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 08:41:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 08:31:32 AMPainting slogans on shop windows or walls is not physical aggression but their psychological effect is just as bad. And what guarantee do we have that some deranged people will not get from painting slogans to actual physical aggressions, especially with the demonization of unvaccinated going full speed and virtually unopposed in the media?


Aggression is understandable.  See an earlier post.


Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:38:39 AMA sort of de facto apartheid.


Yes, and one with a public health justification.  This is not the first time that public health has been abused for self-righteous political purposes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 08:46:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 07:51:58 AM
Then how comes that highly vaccinated countries witness an alarming surge in infections, so alarming that they have to go the lockdown way yet again?

Because of the highly contagious omikron, which makes more lockdown necessary. This was not actual to the same degree with the delta.

Quote from: Florestan
If I remember correctly, all countries started the vaccination precisely with the vulnerable goups of society. Are you telling me the vaccines don't actually protect them?

They offer some protection for the elderly and vulnerable, but probably not enough against the omikron, whereas they offer better protection for those with a well-functioning immunesystem.

Quote from: Florestan
This is not what he have been told in the beginning. We have been told "Get vaccinated in order to return to normal life!" We have been lied to, don't you think?

This was in the days of the delta, before the omikron emerged. It has changed the game. Now we can only hope to keep it somewhat down if everybody is vaccinated and a number of restrictions observed.

Quote from: Florestan
How about unvaccinated people who have got Covid and recovered? Is their naturally-acquired immunity to be overlooked or downright negated? How about unvaccinated people who never ever had Covid? Is their innate immunity to be overlooked or downright negated?

The naturally acquired immunity doesn't seem to last longer than immunity after vaccination. And all people 50+ run a greater risk than necessary when they are not vaccinated.  I might understand the scepticism against vaccination, if vaccination was associated with a high degree of side-effects. But this isn't the case.

Quote from: Florestan
What you suggest amounts to a presumption of guilt regarding the unvaccinated which is utterly unacceptable.

I don't think guilt is the right word. But I think the unvaccinated exert an asocial and reckless behaviour, bringing others at risk much more than they need.

Quote from: Florestan
So what do you propose? To have the underclass of unvaccinated denied treatment?

Of course not. But I think it is fair to exclude them from different social activities, travelling et.c. and also jobs particularly in the health care section.

Quote from: Florestan
I'm sorry to hear that and I hope you stay safe all the time. But in this caes you should beware of vaccinated people as well --- actually, you should get in direct contact only with people whio have tested negative --- which is the only way to tell who is infected and who is not with some degree of accuracy.

You have a point there. But else I should isolate myself completely, and this might affect my mental state in the long run. But actually the health authorities here recommend testing before one visits older vulnerable relatives. Ideally this presupposes a PCR test, which you can't get that easily now because of the increasing demand.

Quote from: Florestan
Fear is part of reality.

Maybe we agree, maybe not. I hinted at fear based upon reality.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 08:49:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 08:31:49 AM
A little amusing, Andrei, that you did not highlight [Todd]'s :  The benefits of vaccination are quite clear.

They are quite clear in reducing the number of hospitalizations and deaths. They are far from being so quite clear in reducing the number of infections --- actually, data suggest they don't reduce infections in any significant degree. If they did, then the current lockdowns and restrictions in many EU countries would be wholly unjustified.

QuoteThe benefits of mandating vaccination are also quite clear.

Last I checked, mandating a medical procedure on anyone without their informed consent is contrary to international law, Romanian law included.

QuoteDecrying that as Big Brother is a self-righteous fantasy all its own. Why, perhsps it is even fear-mongering.

Making people healthy against their will is akin to making people virtuous against their will or making people happy against their will: authoritarianism in a nutshell --- We, the Governments and Experts know best what's best for ordinary people's good and we will make them healthy/virtuous/happy whether they like it or not: if they don't know it, we'll teach them; if they can't do it, we'll help them; if they won't do it, we'll force them.

Different pretext, same goal.

QuoteSeparately, some good news: South Africa's huge omicron wave appears to be subsiding just as quickly as it grew

I wish I could say that suggests that US hospitals are not in danger of being over-stressed, but we cannot, in good reason, can we?

Of course you can't. Had you read the SA article I quoted above, you'd have leearned that much. The SA scientists claim that a high vaccine-induced immunity but a low disease-and-recover immunity (which is exactly the case for many Western countries) is no guarantee for mildness. But they're never quoted in New York Times or Washington Post.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:52:11 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 08:31:49 AM
The benefits of mandating vaccination are also quite clear.


Look at the related idea of a vaccine passport - not a mandate but a carrot to induce people to vaccinate. In some countries it worked (France) in some countries it worked much less well (Israel) I guess the same may be true for vaccine mandates. That's to say, the refusers could become entrenched in their refusal. The 2022 equivalent of draft dodgers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 22, 2021, 08:52:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 08:31:49 AM
(...)

Separately, some good news: South Africa's huge omicron wave appears to be subsiding just as quickly as it grew

(...)

Got interested and checked the source for this:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-africa-s-huge-omicron-wave-appears-to-be-subsiding-just-as-quickly-as-it-grew/ar-AAS3RTg?ocid=uxbndlbing

"I'd say we are probably between two and three weeks ahead of the U.S., about two ahead of Norway and Denmark, and substantially ahead of, probably up to four weeks, the U.K. and the rest of Europe. But what we're seeing here in South Africa at least tentatively should be good news for everyone."

Here's a bit of evidence about the tendency with less cases:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-africa/

It will be interesting to see if this holds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 08:53:05 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 08:46:51 AM
Maybe we agree, maybe not. I hinted at fear based upon reality.

I am somehow not surprised that it does not occur to our Andrei that one can seek information about the viral enemy, without backing into fear. Maybe he has some emotional need to feel that people other than himself are somehow "crippled by fear."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:59:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 08:31:49 AMDecrying that as Big Brother is a self-righteous fantasy all its own.

It is not a fantasy to observe that the mandates are designed to force people to do something to their bodies which they do not wish to do. And that's justified by maximising the resulting total benefit.

And it is not inappropriate to suggest that this sets a precedent, a precedent which from some points of view is undesirable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 08:59:44 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 08:01:19 AM

Vaccines will, it is hoped, prevent death and serious complications.  Current evidence indicates that is what happens.  Clearly vaccines cannot prevent the spread of the disease.  That's been known for a while.  Anecdotally, I had an employee who was fully vaccinated yet contracted Covid twice afterward, and that was months before omicron.  In the health care delivery company I cited earlier, "breakthrough" infections are common, and have been all year.  The benefits of vaccination are quite clear. 

Breakthrough infections became common with the delta variant even in the short run because the effect of the vaccines declined rather fast. These infections are more common with the omikron variant even with people who have got their third jab relatively recently.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 09:00:59 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 08:59:44 AMBreakthrough infections became common with the delta variant


They were common prior to the Delta variant. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 09:02:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:59:14 AM
It is not a fantasy to observe that the mandates are designed to force people to do something to their bodies which they do not wish to do. And that's justified by maximising the resulting total benefit.

And it is not inappropriate to suggest that this sets a precedent, a precedent which from some points of view is desirable.


The legitimate use of coercive state power is one of the most important topics of all.  Literary diversions are mere diversions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 09:04:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 08:53:05 AM
Maybe he has some emotional need to feel that people other than himself are somehow "crippled by fear."

I think you should delete this comment, it's not very gentlemanly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 09:10:48 AM
STOP ARGUING EVERYONE, THERE'S SOME GOOD NEWS.

A report from Imperial College London showing that the risk of serious illness from omicron is significantly reduced.

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-50-severity-omicron/

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2021-12-22-COVID19-Report-50.pdf

QuoteOverall, we find evidence of a reduction in the risk of hospitalisation for Omicron relative to Delta infections, averaging over all cases in the study period. The extent of reduction is sensitive to the inclusion criteria used for cases and hospitalisation, being in the range 20-25% when using any attendance at hospital as the endpoint, and 40-45% when using hospitalisation lasting 1 day or longer or hospitalisations with the ECDS discharge field recorded as "admitted" as the endpoint.

In their press comments, they have been keen to stress that this reduction in disease severity  "appears to be offset by the reduced efficacy of vaccines against infection with the Omicron variant."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 09:23:54 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 08:46:51 AM
I don't think guilt is the right word. But I think the unvaccinated exert an asocial and reckless behaviour, bringing others at risk much more than they need.

You are right: guilt is not at all the right word. It shows no nuance, but then it was Andrei's self-righteous word, of course, and the man on the soap box has no need for nuance. For bringing others at risk much more than they need, I would suggest instead: posing a risk to others, which is not (despite their posturing) a behavior to which they possess any inherent right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 09:31:12 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 09:00:59 AM

They were common prior to the Delta variant.

Yes, there have from the beginning been people who didn't respond sufficiently to the vaccine and got infected early, but the immunity of the earliest vaccinated people began to decline already in April/May this year, and this is the reason of the so called breakthrough infections already when we had alfa and delta.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 09:35:55 AM
Pfizer pill becomes first FDA-authorized home COVID treatment

By MATTHEW PERRONE The Associated Press, Updated December 22, 2021

US health regulators on Wednesday authorized the first pill against COVID-19, a Pfizer drug that Americans will be able to take at home to head off the worst effects of the virus.

The long-awaited milestone comes as US cases, hospitalizations and deaths are all rising and health officials warn of a tsunami of new infections from the Omicron variant that could overwhelm hospitals.

The drug, Paxlovid, is a faster, cheaper way to treat early COVID-19 infections, though initial supplies will be extremely limited. All of the previously authorized drugs against the disease require an IV or an injection.

An antiviral pill from Merck also is expected to soon win authorization. But Pfizer's drug is all but certain to be the preferred option because of its mild side effects and superior effectiveness, including a nearly 90 percent reduction in hospitalizations and deaths among patients most likely to get severe disease.

"The efficacy is high, the side effects are low and it's oral. It checks all the boxes," said Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic. "You're looking at a 90 percent decreased risk of hospitalization and death in a high-risk group — that's stunning."

The Food and Drug Administration authorized Pfizer's drug for adults and children ages 12 and older with a positive COVID-19 test and early symptoms who face the highest risks of hospitalization. That includes older people and those with conditions like obesity and heart disease. Children eligible for the drug must weigh at least 88 pounds (40 kilograms).

The pills from both Pfizer and Merck are expected to be effective against Omicron because they don't target the spike protein where most of the variant's worrisome mutations reside.

Pfizer currently has 180,000 treatment courses available worldwide, with roughly 60,000 to 70,000 allocated to the US Federal health officials are expected to ration early shipments to the hardest hit parts of the country. Pfizer said the small supply is due to the manufacturing time — currently about nine months. The company says it can halve production time next year.

The US government has agreed to purchase enough Paxlovid to treat 10 million people. Pfizer says it's on track to produce 80 million courses globally next year, under contracts with the U.K., Australia and other nations.

Health experts agree that vaccination remains the best way to protect against COVID-19. But with roughly 40 million American adults still unvaccinated, effective drugs will be critical to blunting the current and future waves of infection.

The US is now reporting more than 140,000 new infections daily and federal officials warn that the Omicron variant could send case counts soaring. Omicron has already whipped across the country to become the dominant strain, federal officials confirmed earlier this week.

Against that backdrop, experts warn that Paxlovid's initial impact could be limited.

For more than a year, biotech-engineered antibody drugs have been the go-to treatments for COVID-19. But they are expensive, hard to produce and require an injection or infusion, typically given at a hospital or clinic. Also, laboratory testing suggests the two leading antibody drugs used in the US aren't effective against Omicron.

Pfizer's pill comes with its own challenges.

Patients will need a positive COVID-19 test to get a prescription. And Paxlovid has only proven effective if given within five days of symptoms appearing. With testing supplies stretched, experts worry it may be unrealistic for patients to self-diagnose, get tested, see a physician and pick up a prescription within that narrow window.

"If you go outside that window of time I fully expect the effectiveness of this drug is going to fall," said Andrew Pekosz, a Johns Hopkins University virologist.

The FDA based its decision on company results from a 2,250-patient trial that showed the pill cut hospitalizations and deaths by 89 percent when given to people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within three days of symptoms. Less than 1 percent of patients taking the drug were hospitalized and none died at the end of the 30-day study period, compared with 6.5 percent of patients hospitalized in the group getting a dummy pill, which included nine deaths.

Pfizer's drug is part of a decades-old family of antiviral drugs known as protease inhibitors, which revolutionized the treatment of HIV and hepatitis C. The drugs block a key enzyme which viruses need to multiply in the human body.

The US will pay about $500 for each course of Pfizer's treatment, which consists of three pills taken twice a day for five days. Two of the pills are Paxlovid and the third is a different antiviral that helps boost levels of the main drug in the body.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 09:40:33 AM
     An extension of the state power regarding vaccinations to the latest threat hardly counts as an expansion. It's the same power. It's up to the crankitarians to provide a suitable and convincing argument that it's in the public interest to roll that power back. No one should hold their breath.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 09:43:07 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 09:23:54 AM
You are right: guilt is not at all the right word. It shows no nuance, but then it was Andrei's self-righteous word, of course, and the man on the soap box has no need for nuance. For bringing others at risk much more than they need, I would suggest instead: posing a risk to others, which is not (despite their posturing) a behavior to which they possess any inherent right.

Yes, even in an ideal democracy we don't have the right to harm our neighbour neither at will nor by carelessness. This is the essence of the laws which have been approved by our democratically elected parliaments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 09:43:07 AM
Yes, even in an ideal democracy we don't have the right to harm our neighbour neither at will nor by carelessness. This is the essence of the laws which have been approved by our democratically elected parliaments.

     Democracy is evil. Only rule by those who think state power is itself evil can be good. It may not be easy to make it work in practice (what will replace voters?) but no one can deny it's a beautiful idea, amiright?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:04:16 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 08:46:51 AM

Because of the highly contagious omikron, which makes more lockdown necessary. This was not actual to the same degree with the delta.

They offer some protection for the elderly and vulnerable, but probably not enough against the omikron, whereas they offer better protection for those with a well-functioning immunesystem.

This was in the days of the delta, before the omikron emerged. It has changed the game. Now we can only hope to keep it somewhat down if everybody is vaccinated and a number of restrictions observed.

When sigma emerges, it too will change the game: we will need a new booster and a new lockdown. Then tau will change the game as well: we will need a new booster an a new lockdown. Then upsilon, then, then, then, all the way down to omega which will require the umpteenth booster and lockdown. And after omega, then what? Will we start anew from alpha 2.0?

QuoteThe naturally acquired immunity doesn't seem to last longer than immunity after vaccination.

I've read scientific papers claiming otherwise.

QuoteAnd all people 50+ run a greater risk than necessary when they are not vaccinated. 

The risk is assessed on a case by case basis, taking into account many more factors than mere age.

QuoteI might understand the scepticism against vaccination, if vaccination was associated with a high degree of side-effects. But this isn't the case.

This is not the case according to whom?

QuoteI think the unvaccinated exert an asocial and reckless behaviour, bringing others at risk much more than they need.

I think it is fair to exclude them from different social activities, travelling et.c. and also jobs particularly in the health care section.

I beg to differ. Strongly.

QuoteYou have a point there. But else I should isolate myself completely, and this might affect my mental state in the long run.

According to psychiatrists and psychologists, lockdown and restrictions do affect people in the long run, especially children and teenagers.

QuoteBut actually the health authorities here recommend testing before one visits older vulnerable relatives. Ideally this presupposes a PCR test, which you can't get that easily now because of the increasing demand.

I'\m astonished. If tomorrow I wanted to take a PCR test, I'd have plenty of locations to chose from: just go there, fill a form, wait for maybe 15 mins at most and get tested --- on my own money, of course. I should have thought that Denmark was way ahead Romania in this respect.

QuoteMaybe we agree, maybe not.

I agree that vaccines greatly reduce the number of hospitalizations and deaths because of Covid-19.

I agree that many anti-vaxxers are loons.

I disagree that vaccinations greatly reduce the number of infections.

I disagree that vaccination should be mandatory, including by such means as requiring vaccination prrof in order to be able to go to work.

I disagree that unvaccinated people are either benighted or conscious enemies of the people.

I  disagree that governments, experts and pharmaceutical companies are fully impartial, completely honest and driven exclusively by genuine concerns for people's health.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 22, 2021, 10:07:39 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM
I have just become eligible for a booster, alas it won't be possible to schedule it until the first week of January.

I am amazed to see large scale lock-downs suggested. Our civilization can't continue with large scale lock downs, and especially school closures. The lockdowns were necessary and effective measures to slow the progress of the pandemic and keep health care systems from collapsing until a vaccine could be developed. Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.

Absolutely correct but will the politicians see it this way? We have a new Chief Health Officer here in Queensland who is a significant step up from the bumbling sycophantic fool we had previously. He  is an immunologist and has already stated that how we report on Covid must change from the number of cases to the number of hospitalisations. Our Premier, however, is a worry and despite that fact that she has stated that we will never go into lockdown again, I just don't believe her. I reckon that crunch time is about two weeks away.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:09:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 08:59:14 AM
It is not a fantasy to observe that the mandates are designed to force people to do something to their bodies which they do not wish to do. And that's justified by maximising the resulting total benefit.

And it is not inappropriate to suggest that this sets a precedent, a precedent which from some points of view is undesirable.

Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:11:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 09:04:41 AM
I think you should delete this comment, it's not very gentlemanly.

As of late I've grew accustomed to exactly this kind of comments from our dear Karl regarding me, so I don't mind it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 10:15:52 AM
Trump's Handling of COVID Was Worse Than You Thought. (https://thetriad.thebulwark.com/p/trumps-handling-of-covid-was-worse)
Someone ought to go to jail.

Jonathan V. Last
1 hr ago

1. Early COVID

Last week the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis issued a report, along with a release of some emails and interviews.

First things first: This report is not what America needs. The report is overly partisan and at times reads like a combination of score-settling against the Trump administration and justification of the Biden administration.

What we need is a comprehensive, non-partisan excavation of the American government's response to COVID. Something along the lines of the 9/11 Commission. Because what we saw in 2020 and 2021 amounts to the greatest failure of the federal government in our lifetimes. The people responsible for this failure must be held accountable, on the record. And we must not be repeat this failure in the future.

All of that said, the factual material in this short report is . . . I don't even know the right word for it.

Here are some highlights, in timeline form.

Last week the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis issued a report, along with a release of some emails and interviews.

First things first: This report is not what America needs. The report is overly partisan and at times reads like a combination of score-settling against the Trump administration and justification of the Biden administration.

What we need is a comprehensive, non-partisan excavation of the American government's response to COVID. Something along the lines of the 9/11 Commission. Because what we saw in 2020 and 2021 amounts to the greatest failure of the federal government in our lifetimes. The people responsible for this failure must be held accountable, on the record. And we must not be repeat this failure in the future.

All of that said, the factual material in this short report is . . . I don't even know the right word for it.

Here are some highlights, in timeline form.

February 25, 2020: No Americans have died of COVID yet.

From the report:

[T]he Trump White House blocked CDC's requests to conduct public briefings for more than three months following a February 25, 2020, CDC briefing in which then-CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Nancy Messonnier accurately warned the public about the risks posed by the coronavirus. Dr. Messonnier confirmed that this briefing "angered" then-President Trump.

February 29, 2020: The first American dies of COVID.

Total U.S. dead: 1


On February 29, advisers to the president send a memo warning about what is about to happen. From the report:

[A] '"first wave" of infections in the United States was imminent and that the federal government needed to "be honest about the situation and show it is undertaking major decisive actions" to combat the coronavirus. A memo to then-President Trump dated one day later warned that the country was facing "a very serious public health emergency" and recommended "Industrial Mobilization of Supply Chains," while emphasizing that the Administration's "movement is NOT fast enough."

In response, the president and his surrogates attempted to publicly deny that there was any problem at all. For instance, here is Trump on March 10: "It will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away."

May 24, 2020: 620 Americans die.

Total U.S. dead: 97,690


Jay Butler, the Deputy Director CDC Infectious Diseases, sends an email to the White House protesting that they have altered CDC guidelines by deleting suggestions for wearing masks and for limiting in-person church services:

This is not good public health—I am very troubled on this Sunday morning that there will be people who will get sick and perhaps die because of what we were forced to do. Our team has done the good work, only to have it compromised....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 10:16:56 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:03:48 AM
It may not be easy to make it work in practice (what will replace voters?)

The Republicans are working on that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:19:47 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 09:40:33 AM
     An extension of the state power regarding vaccinations to the latest threat hardly counts as an expansion. It's the same power. It's up to the crankitarians to provide a suitable and convincing argument that it's in the public interest to roll that power back. No one should hold their breath.

I don't understand what you're saying here at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 22, 2021, 10:20:21 AM
It has been stated  a few times in the more recent posts to this thread that the unvaccinated pose a threat to those who are vaxxed and that they should be treated differently from the rest of us. I would have thought that it was the other way around in that the unvaxxed are basically a threat to others who also haven't had the jab. If that is the case then discriminating against them makes no sense whatsoever. I'm happy to mingle with the unvaxxed simply because I have no known comorbidities and am double (soon to be triple) vaxxed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Brahmsian on December 22, 2021, 10:22:25 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM

I am amazed to see large scale lock-downs suggested. Our civilization can't continue with large scale lock downs, and especially school closures. The lockdowns were necessary and effective measures to slow the progress of the pandemic and keep health care systems from collapsing until a vaccine could be developed. Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.

⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

This!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:24:37 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 22, 2021, 10:07:39 AM
Absolutely correct but will the politicians see it this way? We have a new Chief Health Officer here in Queensland who is a significant step up from the bumbling sycophantic fool we had previously. He  is an immunologist and has already stated that how we report on Covid must change from the number of cases to the number of hospitalisations. Our Premier, however, is a worry and despite that fact that she has stated that we will never go into lockdown again, I just don't believe her. I reckon that crunch time is about two weeks away.

The datum which is most interesting is not the number of people in hospital with covid, it's not number of people who are admitted to hospital because of covid. Clearly as omicron rages, more people will be admitted with the disease even though the disease isn't the reason for admission.

But the UK, which has been quite open in this pandemic, has declined to publish this data. I not think the most reliable indicator of the disease's impact is the number of people in intensive care,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:27:01 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on December 22, 2021, 06:02:46 AM
I have just become eligible for a booster, alas it won't be possible to schedule it until the first week of January.

I am amazed to see large scale lock-downs suggested. Our civilization can't continue with large scale lock downs, and especially school closures. The lockdowns were necessary and effective measures to slow the progress of the pandemic and keep health care systems from collapsing until a vaccine could be developed. Now we have the vaccine. At this point the disease is here to stay and we have to wait for it to equilibrate and become and endemic disease, which will will moderately affect the vaccinated population.

The reason that states are proposing large scale lockdowns is simple. The hospital system is limited. The politicians do not want to be accountable for  people being refused hospital care in a triage, it would make damaging publicity. Can you imagine the pictures over the front pages, the testimony.


The other things - disrupted education, ruined livelihoods, the negative health consequences of lockdown - those things are less politically damaging.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:30:40 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:24:37 AM
the most reliable indicator of the disease's impact is the number of people in intensive care,

Yes and no. You should take into account that people get into intensive care primarily because of lack of early treatment, and this in its turn can be because of lack of antivirals or lack of extensive testing, or both. A system where testing is extensive and antivirals are widely available for early treatment should have no problems whatever.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:33:13 AM
There are now 54 diagnosed omicron cases in China.  The state response being that 13 million people are now in total lockdown with one family member per household being allowed outside for provisions every two days.

What do you think of that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:37:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:04:16 AM


I  disagree that governments, experts and pharmaceutical companies are fully impartial, completely honest and driven exclusively by genuine concerns for people's health.


     You are disagreeing with phantoms of your own imagination. This is absolutist sham reasoning. What work does "fully", "completely" and "genuine" do? Pharma companies produce vaccines that are impartially, if not "fully, evaluated for safety and efficacy and the results have been nearly miraculous from the perspective of March, 2020. These results were not achieved because everyone was fully completely genuine by any reasonable standard, but in spite of the fact that no one ever is. We live in a "good enough" world where expertise is better than the lack of it, not a world where it's the Platonic ideal or nothing.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 10:38:05 AM
This would work in US Politics, just as well

Tim Miller:

There was a moment in time when the dwindling number of responsible MAGA leaders and right-wing commentators tried to walk a delicate balance on the matter of vaccines, taking credit for the success of Operation Warp Speed and gently encouraging vaccination—while making nods to the death-cult mob that wanted them to fight the snooty elites who condescendingly suggested they take a shot that would spare them from unnecessary death.

In July, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis held a press conference stating clearly that "vaccines are saving lives." A month later former President Trump was booed by his own fans at an Alabama rally for suggesting they get vaccinated.

But as summer turned to fall, their tune changed. It became clear that the vaccine holdouts in the MAGA base were not persuaded by the overwhelming data indicating that the vaccines were safe and effective; nor by paeans to the American entrepreneurial spirit; nor by the desire to honor their dunce-king for his OWS accomplishment.

As the Delta variant ravaged Trump-supporting counties at a disproportionate rate, the people who had the most credibility with their audience gave up on trying to help them save themselves.

And this weekend, the full anti-vax pivot solidified in the context of the booster shots that studies show provide substantial additional protection against the rising Omicron variant.

You would think as the case numbers spiked that MAGA leaders who cared about their constituents would use this opportunity to make the case for the safety and efficacy of a miracle drug that was developed at least in part on President Trump's watch.

But nah . . .

On Fox Business, Maria Bartiromo asked DeSantis if he was getting the booster. In response, DeSantis smirked and began shaking his head no before she even finished the question. Then he said, "So . . . I mean . . . uh . . . I've done whatever I did, the normal shot, and that at the end of the day is people's individual decisions about what they want to do."

DeSantis then proceeded into a lengthy harangue about vaccine passports and letting people make vaccine decisions for themselves

As for the former president, in September he told the Wall Street Journal that he "probably won't" get a booster.  In October he was asked again about whether or not he planned to get a booster. He demurred.

I followed up with his spokesperson Liz Harrington over the weekend to see if he has, in fact, gotten the booster shot. She has not replied. [Update: Shortly before this newsletter went out, Newsweek reported that Trump mentioned getting boosted at an event on Sunday in Dallas, and was booed.]

This lack of response comes despite Harrington having plenty of time over the weekend to  disseminate press releases about Don Lemon, Jussie Smollett, Tish James, Jeff Zucker, Fredo Cuomo, wokeness not being able to stop Christmas, David Perdue, a NH Journal poll about BBB, Robert Jeffress, and doctored photos that make crowd sizes at Trump's events look larger than they were. [so there are still people to do this—kh]

Even the more "mainstream" Republicans, such as Dan Crenshaw and Chip Roy, have pivoted away from encouraging vaccination, choosing to focus instead on telling their constituents: "DO NOT COMPLY" with vaccine guidelines put forth by the Biden administration

It's not hard to divine where this pivot came from. Republicans heard what their base thinks about vaccines and decided that they'd rather risk public health than get crosswise with the hydroxymectin crowd.

This weekend Turning Point USA, the MAGA college Republican spin-off—whose founder died from COVID-19 last summer—held a conference in Phoenix replete with anti-vaccine fervor.

Sarah Palin said it would be "over my dead body" that she got vaccinated (no pun intended), to applause from the crowd. Tucker Carlson railed against those who are urging vaccination saying they just want to punish people (huh?) and then praised the "naturally immune" who earned it, which earned him raucous applause. Organizer Charlie Kirk claimed that Anthony Fauci should be "in jail" and was met with a chorus of "Lock Him Up" chants from the assemblage.

The TPUSA People's Temple demonstrated that there is no longer any interest in the old vaccine two-step.

So Trump and DeSantis and the rest have fully succumbed to #WeThePeople's demands, consequences be damned.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:37:13 AM
     You are disagreeing with phantoms of your own imagination. This is absolutist sham reasoning.

Ah, I see you have met our Andrei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:41:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:27:01 AM
The reason that states are proposing large scale lockdowns is simple. The hospital system is limited. The politicians do not want to be accountable for  people being refused hospital care in a triage, it would make damaging publicity. Can you imagine the pictures over the front pages, the testimony.


The other things - disrupted education, ruined livelihoods, the negative health consequences of lockdown - those things are less politically damaging.

I think people are basically divided along two lines: )1) those who have an unlimited trust in government and think that everything said and done by the government is true, honest and useful and could not have been done any other way and anyone who opposes what the govrenment says and does is an enemy of the people and (2) those who don't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:47:14 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:19:47 AM
I don't understand what you're saying here at all.

drogulus sunt, non leguntur.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:52:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:19:47 AM
I don't understand what you're saying here at all.

     Vaccine mandates and other measures associated with severe epidemics are examples of the same state power as used in the past. The argument that this is an innovation in powergrabbery is utterly dishonest. A different theory of the case is that it has always been an intolerable power grab for the state to assume a public health role on the grounds that there is no such thing as the public good for a state to promote, which doesn't leave much room for a state to exist at all, even one run on a crankish fantasy of absolute freedom, whatever the fuck that's supposed to be.

     I surmise that the reason some people are unfamiliar with this kind of thought is that the whiffs of argumentation that reaches their minds are so outlandish and fantastical that it hardly seems worth investigating further, much like the case of anarcho-communism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:58:00 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:33:13 AM
There are now 54 diagnosed omicron cases in China.  The state response being that 13 million people are now in total lockdown with one family member per household being allowed outside for provisions every two days.

What do you think of that?

I think the Chinese government, under the wise leadership of the Communist Parrty Secretary Gereral Xi Jinping, takes all the best measures to ensure that the Chinese people has a bright and happy future and is working toward realising humanity's golden dream, ie Communism. Long live the Chinese Communist Party headed by its secretary general Xi Jinping! Long live the struggle for peace!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 10:58:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 10:15:52 AM
Trump's Handling of COVID Was Worse Than You Thought. (https://thetriad.thebulwark.com/p/trumps-handling-of-covid-was-worse)
Someone ought to go to jail.

Jonathan V. Last
1 hr ago

1. Early COVID

Last week the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis issued a report, along with a release of some emails and interviews.

First things first: This report is not what America needs. The report is overly partisan and at times reads like a combination of score-settling against the Trump administration and justification of the Biden administration.

What we need is a comprehensive, non-partisan excavation of the American government's response to COVID. Something along the lines of the 9/11 Commission. Because what we saw in 2020 and 2021 amounts to the greatest failure of the federal government in our lifetimes. The people responsible for this failure must be held accountable, on the record. And we must not be repeat this failure in the future.

All of that said, the factual material in this short report is . . . I don't even know the right word for it.

Here are some highlights, in timeline form.

Last week the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis issued a report, along with a release of some emails and interviews.

First things first: This report is not what America needs. The report is overly partisan and at times reads like a combination of score-settling against the Trump administration and justification of the Biden administration.

What we need is a comprehensive, non-partisan excavation of the American government's response to COVID. Something along the lines of the 9/11 Commission. Because what we saw in 2020 and 2021 amounts to the greatest failure of the federal government in our lifetimes. The people responsible for this failure must be held accountable, on the record. And we must not be repeat this failure in the future.

All of that said, the factual material in this short report is . . . I don't even know the right word for it.

Here are some highlights, in timeline form.

February 25, 2020: No Americans have died of COVID yet.

From the report:

[T]he Trump White House blocked CDC's requests to conduct public briefings for more than three months following a February 25, 2020, CDC briefing in which then-CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Nancy Messonnier accurately warned the public about the risks posed by the coronavirus. Dr. Messonnier confirmed that this briefing "angered" then-President Trump.

February 29, 2020: The first American dies of COVID.

Total U.S. dead: 1


On February 29, advisers to the president send a memo warning about what is about to happen. From the report:

[A] '"first wave" of infections in the United States was imminent and that the federal government needed to "be honest about the situation and show it is undertaking major decisive actions" to combat the coronavirus. A memo to then-President Trump dated one day later warned that the country was facing "a very serious public health emergency" and recommended "Industrial Mobilization of Supply Chains," while emphasizing that the Administration's "movement is NOT fast enough."

In response, the president and his surrogates attempted to publicly deny that there was any problem at all. For instance, here is Trump on March 10: "It will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away."

May 24, 2020: 620 Americans die.

Total U.S. dead: 97,690


Jay Butler, the Deputy Director CDC Infectious Diseases, sends an email to the White House protesting that they have altered CDC guidelines by deleting suggestions for wearing masks and for limiting in-person church services:

This is not good public health—I am very troubled on this Sunday morning that there will be people who will get sick and perhaps die because of what we were forced to do. Our team has done the good work, only to have it compromised....


Worth pointing out that a not inconsiderable part of the problem was journalists mistakenly treating Trump as if he had been a "normal President."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 11:00:58 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 22, 2021, 10:52:51 AM
     Vaccine mandates and other measures associated with severe epidemics are examples of the same state power as used in the past. The argument that this is an innovation in powergrabbery is utterly dishonest.

Aye.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 11:20:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:41:21 AM
I think people are basically divided along two lines: )1) those who have an unlimited trust in government and think that everything said and done by the government is true, honest and useful and could not have been done any other way and anyone who opposes what the govrenment says and does is an enemy of the people and (2) those who don't.

There's something much more interesting than that going on. Somehow, I don't understand how exactly, the left have adopted a rigid authoritarian stance in this pandemic, they talk down or even ignore the costs of NPIs and stress the benefits, maybe to the point of exaggerating the benefits. So people's positions have become all mixed up with where they see themselves on the political spectrum.


There's another thing too.  Some people are scared and they want to see actions like vaccine mandates in the face of what they see as a personal threat, because, rightly or wrongly, the feel they would be safer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2021, 11:32:22 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 22, 2021, 07:39:35 AM
(The fact that certain minority communities remain disproportionately less vaccinated is purely coincidental.)

Sure, like white middle aged Republicans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 11:33:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 10:04:16 AM
When sigma emerges, it too will change the game: we will need a new booster and a new lockdown. Then tau will change the game as well: we will need a new booster an a new lockdown. Then upsilon, then, then, then, all the way down to omega which will require the umpteenth booster and lockdown. And after omega, then what? Will we start anew from alpha 2.0?

You are probably completely right, but this is the conditions of life, and we have to react to this, if we want to survive.

Quote from: Florestan
I've read scientific papers claiming otherwise.

The many re-infections tell their own story.

Quote from: Florestan
The risk is assessed on a case by case basis, taking into account many more factors than mere age.

If you make correction for other factors, age is the single most prominent risk factor.

Quote from: Florestan
This is not the case according to whom?

According to the many articles we have read. I have to say, that I only include m-RNA vaccines, which are the only ones used i my country. Mild ephemer endocarditis/carditis/pericarditis has been reported being the only side-effects of notion.

Quote from: Florestan
I beg to differ. Strongly.

You are of course entitled to your opinion, as well as I am to mine.


Quote from: Florestan
According to psychiatrists and psychologists, lockdown and restrictions do affect people in the long run, especially children and teenagers.

And elderly at care homes and many others.

Quote from: Florestan
I'\m astonished. If tomorrow I wanted to take a PCR test, I'd have plenty of locations to chose from: just go there, fill a form, wait for maybe 15 mins at most and get tested --- on my own money, of course. I should have thought that Denmark was way ahead Romania in this respect.

This reflects the high infection number in Denmark, and the high demand of PCR tests.

Quote from: Florestan
I disagree that vaccinations greatly reduce the number of infections.

I disagree that vaccination should be mandatory, including by such means as requiring vaccination prof in order to be able to go to work.

I disagree that unvaccinated people are either benighted or conscious enemies of the people.

I  disagree that governments, experts and pharmaceutical companies are fully impartial, completely honest and driven exclusively by genuine concerns for people's health.

I disagree with all this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 11:35:19 AM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 11:32:22 AM
Sure, like white middle aged Republicans.

Do you think of anyone in particular?  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 11:36:19 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 11:20:45 AM
There's something much more interesting than that going on. Somehow, I don't understand how exactly, the left have adopted a rigid authoritarian stance in this pandemic, they talk down or even ignore the costs of NPIs and stress the benefits, maybe to the point of exaggerating the benefits. So people's positions have become all mixed up with where they see themselves on the political spectrum.

Don't know what a NPI is but I don't think the left is more authoritarian than the right with respect to the Covid-19 pandemic, at least in the EU: Austria's conservative government is the most extreme on the issue, seconded closely by the Greek conservative government. On the other hand, Sweden's left government has had a more relaxed and rational approach all along.

If you ask me, left and right are increasingly obsolete and irrelevant terms. The current CDU in Germany, thanks to Frau Merkel, has shifted so far to the left as to make Helmut Kohl look like a far-right extremist; conversely, many left governments have adopted measures which judged by the left standards of only a few decades ago are decidedly authoritarian.

QuoteThere's another thing too.  Some people are scared and they want to see actions like vaccine mandates in the face of what they see as a personal threat, because, rightly or wrongly, the feel they would be safer.

That's exactly what I said in a previous post --- and the media bears a heavy responsibility in this respect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 11:46:40 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 11:33:14 AMYou are probably completely right, but this is the conditions of life, and we have to react to this, if we want to survive.

Do you imply that any and all people now alive or born in the future, at least in the Western world, who will not get jabbed 3 times a year for the remainder of their lifetime run the risk of dying of Covid-19 in whatever variant it presents itself at any given time?

QuoteYou are of course entitled to your opinion, as well as I am to mine.

Wholeheartedly agreed and I think that by agreeing to disagree we can leave it at that.

Anyway, thank you for a civil and polite discussion. I really appreciate it and respect you. Stay safe at any time, you and all your loved ones!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 11:55:01 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:24:37 AM
The datum which is most interesting is not the number of people in hospital with covid, it's the number of people who are admitted to hospital because of covid. Clearly as omicron rages, more people will be admitted with the disease even though the disease isn't the reason for admission.

But the UK, which has been quite open in this pandemic, has declined to publish this data. I not think the most reliable indicator of the disease's impact is the number of people in intensive care,

That's for sure. Even in my country we can't get that information. Never-the-less these numbers are raising in my country but not as fast as the number of infections. However there is a latency of  maybe two weeks before the number of admissions is affected. And we have not yet seen a large part of the elderly and vulnerable infected with the omikron, but with groving number of infected people this will happen relatively soon even with the actual partial restrictions. With alfa and delta almost all admissions were of people 50+ and most of them 70+. As I wrote above preliminary data from Denmark indicate that there is no obvious clinical difference between infections with Omikron, Alfa or Delta variants.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 12:04:22 PM
The reduction of infection in vaccinated individuals is a matter of record. Which says what about the person who "disagrees" with it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 12:05:01 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 11:46:40 AM
Do you imply that any and all people now alive or born in the future, at least in the Western world, who will not get jabbed 3 times a year for the remainder of their lifetime run the risk of dying of Covid-19 in whatever variant it presents itself at any given time?

In theory : More or less, but no one knows. Hopefully it won't go that far. More efficient vaccines may be invented and the wild animal policy of certain Asiatic countrys may change.

Quote from: Florestan
Wholeheartedly agreed and I think that by agreeing to disagree we can leave it at that.

Anyway, thank you for a civil and polite discussion. I really appreciate it and respect you. Stay safe at any time, you and all your loved ones!

Thanks, I wish you the same. :)
BTW I'm a polite person by nature  0:) 0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 12:10:33 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 12:04:22 PM
The reduction of infection in vaccinated individuals is a matter of record. Which says what about the person who "disagrees" with it?

In this age of misinformation and fake news it's easy to become missguided.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:13:12 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 10:24:37 AM
The datum which is most interesting is not the number of people in hospital with covid, it's [the] number of people who are admitted to hospital because of covid.

Good luck with getting that data.

You might as well ask how many people died with covid vs how many people died because of covid.

Someone's got terminal cancer, gets Covid and dies within two weeks after testing positive. Ergo, he died of Covid, never mind that he'd have died anyway within a few weeks.

Someone has a severe heart attack, gets admitted to hospital, tests positive for Covid and dies after a few hours. Ergo, he died of Covid, never mind that he'd have died anyway within hours.

Cases like that are well documented at personal level but you'll never hear of them in the mainstream media.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:22:24 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 12:10:33 PM
In this age of misinformation and fake news it's easy to become misguided.

This is true --- but misinformation and fake news has been just as much a feature of mainstream media as of social media since quite a long time. Do you remember the times when Saddam Hussein had WMDs, or when the Serbs set up concentration camps, or when the Taliban were freedom fighters against Russian tyranny, or when the Arab Spring was ushering in an era of democracy and freedom? I most certainly do.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 12:28:15 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:13:12 PM
Good luck with getting that data.

You might as well ask how many people died with covid vs how many people died because of covid.

Someone's got terminal cancer, gets Covid and dies within two weeks after testing positive. Ergo, he died of Covid, never mind that he'd have died anyway within a few weeks.

Someone has a severe heart attack, gets admitted to hospital, tests positive for Covid and dies after a few hours. Ergo, he died of Covid, never mind that he'd have died anyway within hours.


I once saw some data about paediatric admissions with delta which suggested that only 15% were incidental.

Cases like that are well documented at personal level but you'll never hear of them in the mainstream media.

One thing we do know is that 40% of the omicron cases in hospital in London are incidental covid admissions, they were admitted because of some other problem and tested automatically.

Clearly with a virus as virulent as omicron, this datum is crucial - without it you really have no idea what's going on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 12:32:03 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:22:24 PM
This is true --- but misinformation and fake news has been just as much a feature of mainstream media as of social media since quite a long time. Do you remember the times when Saddam Hussein had WMDs, or when the Serbs set up concentration camps, or when the Taliban were freedom fighters against Russian tyranny, or when the Arab Spring was ushering in an era of democracy and freedom? I most certainly do.

Yes, you are right. To day it's increasing difficult to navigate in the deluge of news because some of it is true and some of it is not. Often it's about not trusting the politicians, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:34:07 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 12:28:15 PM
One thing we do know is that 40% of the omicron cases in hospital in London are incidental covid admissions, they were admitted because of some other problem and tested automatically.

Clearly with a virus as virulent as omicron, this datum is crucial - without it you really have no idea what's going on.

Of course, but collecting such data and processing it takes time.

Are you aware of any confirmed death because of omicron in the UK? I mean, doctors in hospital X confirm that person Y without any other problems died of omicron in their location.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 12:35:04 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 12:10:33 PM
In this age of misinformation and fake news it's easy to become misguided.

And in this age, there is no lack of the misguided claiming to be experts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 12:40:01 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 12:28:15 PM
One thing we do know is that 40% of the omicron cases in hospital in London are incidental covid admissions, they were admitted because of some other problem and tested automatically.

Still this doesn't hide the fact, that a large - and at the moment growing - number of patients are admitted because of omikron. But I agree, that the number of patients in intensive care with the typical clinical covid picture because of omikron is more interesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 22, 2021, 12:43:46 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 11:32:22 AM
Sure, like white middle aged Republicans.


No, actually I refer to racial minorities.  Half of U.S. States Have Big Racial Vaccine Gaps Heading Into Omicron (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/us-vaccine-demographics.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 12:45:08 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:34:07 PM

Are you aware of any confirmed death because of omicron in the UK? I mean, doctors in hospital X confirm that person Y without any other problems died of omicron in their location.

This would be few, because most patients dying of covid have other diseases which aggravate the covid course eg. COLD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:49:40 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 12:32:03 PM
Yes, you are right. To day it's increasing difficult to navigate in the deluge of news because some of it is true and some of it is not. Often it's about not trusting the politicians, unfortunately.

I am Romanian. I would never ever trust a politician even if they said "It's a fine day today" unless confirmed by three other independent, unpolitical sources.  ;D

This is not to say that alternative or social media is more trustful.

All I'm saying is that any sane and rational person should judge any matter whatsoever according to their own lights and available information, reach their own conclusion and act accordingly. There's going to be disagreement, naturally.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:52:48 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 12:45:08 PM
most patients dying of covid have other diseases which aggravate the covid course

So bottom line, do they die of Covid or with Covid?

It might seem as a trivial matter but it actually makes all the difference in the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2021, 01:17:44 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:52:48 PM
So bottom line, do they die of Covid or with Covid?

It might seem as a trivial matter but it actually makes all the difference in the world.

If someone is in ill health, how do you make the distinction?
I think you can't.... in a lot of cases it will be the sum total of different conditions that pushes someone over the edge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 01:42:34 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 12:52:48 PM
So bottom line, do they die of Covid or with Covid?

It might seem as a trivial matter but it actually makes all the difference in the world.

What Que wrote. One can't make a distinction like that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 01:47:30 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 01:17:44 PM
If someone is in ill health, how do you make the distinction?
I think you can't.... in a lot of cases it will be the sum total of different conditions that pushes someone over the edge.

Completely agreed.

Therefore, let's make some comparative statistics, regardless of Covid or cold or flu or whatever.

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2019 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2020 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2021 was what?

I am confident that such data are available publicly and you, as a Dutch civil servant, have easy access to them, so please post them here so we can discuss the whole matter based on official statistics rather than speculation.

TIA.







Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 01:54:17 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 01:47:30 PM
Therefore, let's make some comparative statistics, regardless of Covid or cold or flu or whatever.

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2019 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2020 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2021 was what?

I am confident that such data are available publicly and you, as a Dutch civil servant, have easy access to them, so please post them here so we can discuss the whole matter based on official statistics rather than speculation.

Those numbers will - as has often been pointed out - be misleading because the corona restrictions also inhibited other infectious diseases with a potentially fatal outcome such as influenza.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 01:59:00 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 01:54:17 PM
Those numbers will - as has often been pointed out - be misleading because the corona restrictions also inhibited other infectious diseases with a potentially fatal outcome such as influenza.

In other words, we can't know with any meaningful precision how many people died of Covid as different from with Covid --- yet we are supposed to believe that the number is so high as to warrant lockdowns, restrictions and mandatory vaccinations even in disguise. Does this make any sense to you?

Has the public Danish healthcare system been overwhelmed and crushed at any time between the onset of the pandemic and right now?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2021, 01:59:49 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 01:47:30 PM
Completely agreed.

Therefore, let's make some comparative statistics, regardless of Covid or cold or flu or whatever.

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2019 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2020 was what?

General mortality rate in The Netherlands in 2021 was what?

I am confident that such data are available publicly and you, as a Dutch civil servant, have easy access to them, so please post them here so we can discuss the whole matter based on official statistics rather than speculation.

TIA.

There you go - excess death is the only reliable indicator.

Below is the Dutch mortality graph starting with 2019. The black line is actual mortality per week (in absolute numbers), the two thin grey lines are the band width of "normal" mortality (up in winter, down in summer) averaged since 2009.

(https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2021-12/sterfte_lag1_2PIs_tm_20211208.jpeg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:10:20 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 01:59:49 PM
There you go - excess death is the only reliable indicator.

Below is the Dutch mortality graph starting with 2019. The black line is actual mortality per week (in absolute numbers), the two thin grey lines are the band width of "normal" mortality (up in winter, down in summer) averaged since 2009.

(https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2021-12/sterfte_lag1_2PIs_tm_20211208.jpeg)

Thank you.

Talking of excess deaths, here's a question: if anyone had called the Dutch 911 for heart attack or encephalytis or any other medical emergency other than Covi-19 during 2020 and 2021 especially during lockdowns, how quickly would have they have been admitted to hospital and got treatment?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 02:12:04 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 01:59:00 PM
In other words, we can't know with any meaningful precision how many people died of Covid as different from with Covid --- yet we are supposed to believe that the number is so high as to warrant lockdowns, restrictions and mandatory vaccinations even in disguise. Does this make any sense to you?

Yes, because most of the people who have died of or with covid probably might have lived much longer without covid.

Quote from: Florestan
Has the public Danish healthcare system been overwhelmed and crushed at any time between the onset of the pandemic and right now?

We were close in April 20 and Dec.20/Jan 21. It's a fact that the by then introduced restrictions changed the course dramatically to the better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 02:17:42 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 01:59:49 PM
There you go - excess death is the only reliable indicator.

Below is the Dutch mortality graph starting with 2019. The black line is actual mortality per week (in absolute numbers), the two thin grey lines are the band width of "normal" mortality (up in winter, down in summer) averaged since 2009.

Even this isn't a fair description of the covid situation,. because missing deaths from influenza and other infectious disease (se my post above) make the diagram look better than it would do if these other diseases had had the option of spreading freely.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:18:31 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:12:04 PM
most of the people who have died of or with covid probably might have lived much longer without covid.

I'm sorry but you have just told me that there's no way we can ever know that.

QuoteWe were close in April 20 and Dec.20/Jan 21. It's a fact that the by then introduced restrictions changed the course dramatically to the better.

How would you know that? All you have is a case of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:22:28 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:17:42 PM
Even this isn't a fair description of the covid situation,. because missing deaths from influenza and other infectious disease (se my post above) make the diagram look better than it would do if these other diseases had had the option of spreading freely.

Am I right in concluding that were it not for the Covid motivated lockdown influenza and other infectiuous diseases would have killed people at the same rate they did before Covid?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 02:24:32 PM
Thousands who 'followed the rules' are about to get covid. They shouldn't be ashamed.

By Angela Haupt
Today at 6:00 a.m. EST

For two years now, Aline, a 30-something graduate student in Ohio, has diligently — desperately, even — protected herself against the coronavirus. Vaccinated and boosted, she took a test last week ahead of holiday travel to Atlanta. She was stunned when it came back positive.

Aline, who requested to be identified by her first name only for privacy reasons, is still puzzling over how she got the virus — was it because she wore a cloth mask rather than a medical-grade one? — and worries that the cough she has now could worsen because she has diabetes. That's not the most painful part of the ordeal, though: "I feel very embarrassed and dumb," she says, and upset that she's causing her family stress. "It's eye-opening that I feel so much shame from it. I'm realizing how much judgment I was secretly harboring against people who got it before."

Aline is part of a rapid uptick in cases in the United States. As two variants collide and states hit new records daily, breakthrough cases are becoming more normal and less of an exception; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns these cases are now "likely" to occur. For many people who test positive during this latest surge, the virus is sparking yet another unpleasant feeling in an ordeal that's churned out plenty: shame.

"There's been this large narrative about the importance of controlling your actions to prevent yourself from getting sick, and from transmitting the illness to other people," says Jessica Stern, a clinical psychologist at NYU Langone Health. "Because the narrative is so closely connected to our behaviors, I think there's this implication, or this assumption, that if you get sick, you must have done something wrong to bring it onto yourself." That's not true, she stresses, "but unfortunately it's inherent in the way we've been thinking about and talking about covid." That can lead to shame, which Stern defines as "the combination of embarrassment or guilt and identity — one of the most visceral emotions."

Health officials have stressed that it's crucial to be fully vaccinated and boosted, and to get tested frequently. But even those safeguards aren't a guarantee against infection: For the week ending Dec. 11, Massachusetts, one of the most highly vaccinated states with 74 percent fully immunized, reported 11,431 breakthrough infections, about 37 percent of its total new positive cases. Sports leagues are canceling games due to outbreaks among vaccinated players, and "Saturday Night Live" scrapped its most recent show because of fears about the virus.

"It's important to understand that with the omicron variant, we're facing a virus that is more transmissible than delta, and in turn delta more transmissible than alpha and so forth," says Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. Some people have misunderstood the role vaccines play in preventing illness, believing that they protect against any and all infection. That's not the case. As Hotez points out, just two to three months after getting the Pfizer booster, protection against symptomatic infection from omicron drops from around 70-75 percent to 30-40 percent. "The bottom line is that getting infected with omicron could now happen to anyone," he says.

The sense of shame that can come with a coronavirus diagnosis isn't surprising, says Lynn Bufka, a senior director at the American Psychological Association and a practicing licensed clinical psychologist in Maryland. "Shame has a history of being connected to various health diagnoses," she says, such as HIV and even, for decades, cancer. "It comes from thinking that you're being seen and judged by others, and gosh, look around. The reality is that there's a lot of judging about people who have covid, so it's understandable that they might feel some shame."

Bufka follows the FacesOfCOVID Twitter account, which shares photos of and stories about those lost to the virus. "It makes me cry almost every single time because these are somebody's loved ones who died," she says. Yet it's easy to start wondering: Was that person vaccinated? How and why did they get sick? Bufka reminds herself: "That's not the point. The point is, somebody had a really terrible illness, and they died from it."

Kelly Michelson, an attending physician at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and director of the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, often takes care of patients who get sick for reasons they theoretically could have prevented. "My place is to just see the patient and help the patient, and not make assumptions about why people make certain choices in their lives," she says, which is helpful advice to anyone who might judge others who test positive for the coronavirus. Doing so would be "making an assumption about some things that we just don't know," she says.

Feeling ashamed about getting covid-19 isn't healthy or helpful, experts agree. Here are some tips on how to clamp down on those feelings.

Acknowledge it. "As a psychologist, we're going to tell people: Acknowledge the emotion," Bufka says. "Try to recognize what it is. We know we're in an environment right now where there's a lot of judgment," and it makes sense that you might be feeling, well, mortified at the idea that others will think you behaved carelessly.

Sue Varma, a psychiatrist in New York, suggests tapping into some self-awareness about where the shame is coming from: Do you have perfectionist standards? Or was staying healthy your way of regaining control during an impossibly trying stretch of time? Reflecting on the reasons you feel ashamed can help you come to terms with the emotion and, ultimately, move past it.

Set it aside in favor of proper health protocols. Research indicates that shame often prevents people who have HIV from disclosing all the relevant facts — to their partners, for example. Bufka says it's reasonable to believe the same thing is playing out now: "It can prevent people from getting the health care that they need, or telling their contacts" about the potential exposure, which is concerning. She urges those who have tested positive for the coronavirus to focus on "what behavior is going to be best for your health, and for the people around you."

That said, don't over-explain the situation. If you're ashamed of your coronavirus diagnosis, you might be tempted to over-explain it to others, Stern says — and "maybe even be preemptively defensive," immediately telling people who didn't ask that you had taken safety protocols seriously. As much as possible, avoid the urge. Stern suggests framing any explanation in a short, lighthearted manner: "I'm super careful, but it got me!"

Consider it a learning experience. "I hate to say we're in this for the long run, but this is like a long game here," Varma says. In many cases, getting covid might have happened despite extreme caution — she knows someone whose daughter recently contracted the virus from her school bus driver, for example. But perhaps, in your desperation to return to normal life, you've been less than careful. In that case, see what you can learn from the experience. As Varma puts it: "Maybe not going to the nightclubs anymore, right?"

Or perhaps you don't wear a mask often. Use this as an opportunity to create a strategy you can use going forward, Bufka suggests: Go online and order a whole bunch of masks, and then "put them everywhere" — in your car, in your purse, in a coat jacket, on the table where you set your keys and mail. And, of course, if you haven't yet gotten vaccinated or have delayed seeking out a booster shot, go do so, Bufka says.

Keep in mind that you can't control what others do or think. "There are some people who are going to act like jerks, and we all have to live with that," says Jonathan S. Abramowitz, a professor of psychology in the University of North Carolina clinical psychology program. "See it for what it is. By all means, don't say, 'Well, this person is making me feel ashamed, so therefore they're right and I should feel ashamed.'" And if your friends are making you feel bad about your diagnosis, perhaps it's time to reconsider the company you keep, Abramowitz says.

Practice self-compassion. Perhaps easier said than done, but it's important, especially given that you're also dealing with a serious virus. First, if you're ruminating over everything you wish you had done differently, flip your perspective and consider: "It could be that you're very diligent and very conscientious, and that's why you're taking this so hard," Varma says. "That just means you're a thoughtful, considerate, caring human being trying really, really hard."

As Bufka points out, second-guessing ourselves isn't productive. Did you forget to wear your mask that one time at the grocery store? Should you have canceled dinner with friends? It's a moot point by now. "I've lived long enough to know that reliving things I did in the past, and trying to figure out a better way to have done them, rarely changes those events," she says.

Remember: You're not a failure. "Millions of other people have gotten sick," Varma says. "Unfortunately, you're not alone. You're not the only one. You're not the first one to get covid, and you won't be the last." And that positive test, she reiterates, "doesn't make you an irresponsible person."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 02:30:28 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:18:31 PM
I'm sorry but you have just told me that there's no way we can ever know that.

Or we might assume they all died of covid, but this isn't a fair description neither.
In the individual case the course of the disease with the typical involvement of the lungs will be very suggestive for covid. We don't know if it had come so far, if the patient hadn't had his complicating disease. But the point is, that many of these patients were far from the terminal stage concerning their complicating disease.

Quote from: Florestan
How would you know that? All you have is a case of post hoc ergo propter hoc.

The number of infections started decreasing about  2 -3 weeks after the introduction of restrictions, which also is expected from a theoretical point of view.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2021, 02:32:08 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:10:20 PM
Thank you.

Talking of excess deaths, here's a question: if anyone had called the Dutch 911 for heart attack or encephalytis or any other medical emergency other than Covi-19 during 2020 and 2021 especially during lockdowns, how quickly would have they have been admitted to hospital and got treatment?

If you mean that a part of the excess death will only be indirectly caused by the epidemic due to the overstretching of the health care system? I think that is a correct assumption.

It's a complicated issue. The assumption is that particularly when the corona cases peaked, the lack of immediate care in certain cases, like heart failure, will certainly have added to the mortality numbers. But then there is added mortality over a longer period of time due to delayed treatments of, for instance, cancer patients. These indirect effects vary between moment in time, type of condition and even local circumstances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 02:35:20 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:22:28 PM
Am I right in concluding that were it not for the Covid motivated lockdown influenza and other infectiuous diseases would have killed people at the same rate they did before Covid?

There is no reason to believe otherwise. Infectious diseases do not fight among themselves, they all fight against us and our measures to prevent them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 22, 2021, 02:35:50 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:17:42 PM
Even this isn't a fair description of the covid situation,. because missing deaths from influenza and other infectious disease (se my post above) make the diagram look better than it would do if these other diseases had had the option of spreading freely.

True, there have been less deaths by influenza.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:36:06 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:30:28 PM
many of these patients were far from the terminal stage concerning their complicating disease.

You know that how? There's no way to tell that unless you have access to their medical records and interview their doctors.

But be it as it may, do you have any similar statistics regarding common flu?

QuoteThe number of infections started decreasing about  2 -3 weeks after the introduction of restrictions, which also is expected from a theoretical point of view.

Of course it did. My point is, how many lockdowns did Denmark had prior to 2020?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:38:37 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:35:20 PM
Infectious diseases do not fight among themselves

Don't they really? Then how come the delta variant become dominant, and how come the omicron variant is supposed to become dominant?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 02:32:08 PM
If you mean that a part of the excess death will only be indirectly caused by the epidemic due to the overstretching of the health care system? I think that is a correct assumption.

It's a complicated issue. The assumption is that particularly when the corona cases peaked, the lack of immediate care in certain cases, like heart failure, will certainly have added to the mortality numbers. But then there is added mortality over a longer period of time due to delayed treatments of, for instance, cancer patients. These indirect effects vary between moment in time, type of condition and even local circumstances.

And the fact that the strain upon the health care system is caused in part by the wilfully unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 02:40:44 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:35:20 PM
There is no reason to believe otherwise. Infectious diseases do not fight among themselves, they all fight against us and our measures to prevent them.

Just so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:41:53 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 02:32:08 PM
If you mean that a part of the excess death will only be indirectly caused by the epidemic due to the overstretching of the health care system? I think that is a correct assumption.

It's a complicated issue. The assumption is that particularly when the corona cases peaked, the lack of immediate care in certain cases, like heart failure, will certainly have added to the mortality numbers. But then there is added mortality over a longer period of time due to delayed treatments of, for instance, cancer patients. These indirect effects vary between moment in time, type of condition and even local circumstances.

Thank you for your honesty --- not that I expected otherwise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:47:14 PM
Quote from: Que on December 22, 2021, 02:35:50 PM
True, there have been less deaths by influenza.

Isn't this a clear case of infectious diseases fighting each other?  Are we supposed to believe that influenza was much milder in 2020 and 2021 just out of the blue air?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 02:47:38 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:36:06 PM
You know that how? There's no way to tell that unless you have access to their medical records and interview their doctors.

Statens Seruminstitut made an investigation about a year ago, studying a large number of journals, and their conclusion was - as far as I recall - that covid was the decisive death factor in 90 % of cases.

Quote from: Florestan
But be it as it may, do you have any similar statistics regarding common flu?
It was rapported that we had as well as no influenza last winter. Dont recall the exact figures, but I think less than 100 rapported cases.

Quote from: Florestan
Of course it did. My point is, how many lockdowns did Denmark had prior to 2020?

None, as far as I know. You can say, that the prevention of influenza has been too careless, and many Danes will agree with you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:47:38 PM
Statens Seruminstitut made an investigation about a year ago, studying a large number of journals, and their conclusion was - as far as I recall - that covid was the decisive death factor in 90 % of cases.

Is there any such investigation prior to 2020? I mean, you admitted that inf,uenza can kill people with commorbidities. Are you aware of any Statens Seruminstitut investigation in this respet?

QuoteIt was rapported that we had as well as no influenza last winter. Dont recall the exact figures, but I think less than 100 rapported cases.

And do you really believe that?

I mean, how many cases of influenza did you have in the 2019 -2020 winter season? Amd how on earth are you supposed to believe that in the 2020-2021 winter season you had basically no influenza cases? Whatever caused this dramatic drop?

None, as far as I know. You can say, that the prevention of influenza has been too careless, and many Danes will agree with you.
[/quote]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:02:48 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:47:14 PM
Isn't this a clear case of infectious diseases fighting each other?  Are we supposed to believe that influenza was much milder in 2020 and 2021 just out of the blue air?

Yes, influenza was milder these years because the corona-restrictions also prevented influenza.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:05:09 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:47:38 PM
None, as far as I know. You can say, that the prevention of influenza has been too careless, and many Danes will agree with you.

If and only if you mean that many Danes are of the opinion that inluenza should be fought by lockdowns and restrictions, then I say that many Danes have lost their minds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:09:42 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:02:48 PM
Yes, influenza was milder these years because the corona-restrictions also prevented influenza.

Then let's get all countries in permanent lockdown --- this way there will be no more flu, smallpox or whatever infectious disease you can think of.

Oh, btw, why should we be asked only for anti-Covid vaccination? Why Is it okay if I go to work with flu or smallpox but not with Covid?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:17:33 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 02:57:03 PM
There is a little chance that the third jap has a tad longer lasting effect. We can hope.

Chance (little for that matter) and hope. That's not trustful science if you ask me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:24:08 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 02:59:54 PM
I mean, how many cases of influenza did you have in the 2019 -2020 winter season? Amd how on earth are you supposed to believe that in the 2020-2021 winter season you had basically no influenza cases? Whatever caused this dramatic drop?

An excess mortality of 751 people was experienced in the influenza season 2016/17, 2,822 people in 2017/18 and 790 people in 2018/19, but only 117 in 2019/20. It seems as if the results for 2020/21 are pending, but we were more times told, that influenza was rather rare in this years season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:25:44 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:05:09 PM
If and only if you mean that many Danes are of the opinion that inluenza should be fought by lockdowns and restrictions, then I say that many Danes have lost their minds.

Of course not lockdowns, but maybe face masks in public transport and that kind of things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:26:48 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:24:08 PM
An excess mortality of 751 people was experienced in the influenza season 2016/17, 2,822 people in 2017/18 and 790 people in 2018/19, but only 117 in 2019/20. It seems as if the results for 2020/21 are pending, but we were more times told, that influenza was rather rare in this years season.

You were told... Do you really believe everything you are told?


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:30:09 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:09:42 PM
Oh, btw, why should we be asked only for anti-Covid vaccination? Why Is it okay if I go to work with flu or smallpox but not with Covid?

It isn't OK, but many people think they display some kind of heroism by doing so. I can honestly say that I never went to work (or further back in time to school) when ill with an infectious disease. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:30:51 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:25:44 PM
Of course not lockdowns, but maybe face masks in public transport and that kind of things.

Come on, my friend --- if I can call you that...

Were it not for the Covid-19 pandemic you'd have never ever thought about wearing a mask in public transport.

Have you never ever got into public transport knowing that you are with flu and not wearing a mask?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:32:09 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:26:48 PM
You were told... Do you really believe everything you are told?

Yes, when it is told by the leader of the Danish health authorities at an official press-conference I believe it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:34:00 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:30:09 PM
It isn't OK, but many people think they display some kind of heroism by doing so.

Virtue signalling, then --- thanks for admitting that much.

QuoteI can honestly say that I never went to work (or further back in time to school) when ill with an infectious disease.

What did you do then? Took a sick leave every time you had a running nose, cough and fever?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:42:43 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:32:09 PM
Yes, when it is told by the leader of the Danish health authorities at an official press-conference I believe it.

Okay. It must be the case that the Danish government or health authorities have never ever lied to, or duped, the Danish people. Good for you and your government. However, this is not the case of Romanian government or health authorities. They have repeatedly lied to, or duped, the Romanian people --- and not only with respect to the pandemics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:43:34 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:30:51 PM
Come on, my friend --- if I can call you

Your decision.

Quote from: Florestan
Were it not for the Covid-19 pandemic you'd have never ever thought about wearing a mask in public transport.

Probably right.


Quote from: Florestan
Have you never ever got into public transport knowing that you are with flu and not wearing a mask?

No. If I have felt ill in that way, I have stayed at home. In one single instance forty years ago I have visited a local grocery, because I had no food at home and nobody to help me, but I told them I was ill and kept distance. I know very well how contagious diseases are transmitted. In another instance having caught a heavy cold, my chief doctor asked me to talk with patients while using a face mask, but I refused.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:43:34 PM
No. If I have felt ill in that way, I have stayed at home.

Of course. I would have done the same. Many workers in the US do not have employers who would encourage them to stay home under those circs. It's a rare employer in the US to take the enlightened self-interest in the health of its employees.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:43:34 PM
Your decision.

You're my friend then --- and I'm proud to call you such.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:50:28 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 22, 2021, 03:34:00 PM
Virtue signalling, then --- thanks for admitting that much.

What did you do then? Took a sick leave every time you had a running nose, cough and fever?

Yes, and not always a popular decision. In average I have had 15 - 20 days sick leave per. year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 22, 2021, 03:54:46 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 22, 2021, 03:47:02 PM
Of course. I would have done the same. Many workers in the US do not have employers who would encourage them to stay home under those circs. It's a rare employer in the US to take the enlightened self-interest in the health of its employees.

Yes, I have been lucky to have that option, even if sometimes unpopular. But I think we ourselves have the obligation in the health sector to observe the advices we give the patients.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: bhodges on December 22, 2021, 04:00:29 PM
Pausing this thread for a moment.

Gentlemen, please return to listening to (and talking about) music. It will make the world a better place.

Thank you.

--Bruce
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: bhodges on December 22, 2021, 05:40:52 PM
OK, folks, please continue discussion, bearing the following things in mind:

1. The pandemic is plagued (pun intended) by lots of misinformation, everywhere.
2. It is also plagued by lots of miscommunication, everywhere.
3. It is an extremely stressful issue for all of us. Many of us know people who are either very sick or have died.
4. The holiday season is also quite stressful for many, only adding to the mix.

Please consider these points, and remember, if you think a post is likely not appropriate -- you're probably right. Thank you.

--Bruce
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 22, 2021, 05:46:39 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 22, 2021, 03:54:46 PM
Yes, I have been lucky to have that option, even if sometimes unpopular. But I think we ourselves have the obligation in the health sector to observe the advices we give the patients.

That can be a challenge for the care-givers, indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 02:02:12 AM
More good news about omicron, this time from Edinburgh University

QuoteThese early national data suggest that Omicron is associated with a two-thirds reduction in the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation when compared to Delta.

https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/245818096/Severity_of_Omicron_variant_of_concern_and_vaccine_effectiveness_against_symptomatic_disease.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 05:44:21 AM
No surprise: Driven by omicron, U.S. cases surpass summer delta peak
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 05:59:01 AM
It's just our unvaccinated neighbors' way of wishing us all a very merry Christmas—

In highly vaccinated New England, hospitals are under unprecedented strain as coronavirus surges

By Joanna Slater
Today at 8:00 a.m. EST

On a recent morning, Neil Meehan opened a spreadsheet he has come to dread.

It showed the number of intensive-care beds available in an area of New Hampshire that is home to 350,000 people: two.

A day earlier, there was just one. Very often there are none.

Meehan, the chief physician executive at Exeter Hospital, has worked in emergency medicine for nearly three decades. He has lost track of the number of unprecedented things he has witnessed during this second pandemic winter as virus cases and hospitalizations in the state hit record highs.

His hospital has canceled elective surgeries and placed adult patients in pediatric wards. There are members of the National Guard carrying out support tasks. One seriously ill patient had to wait a week for a transfer to a larger hospital that could treat his condition, a move that normally would have taken hours.

"You have duress in the system that I have never seen before," said Meehan, 56.

Across New England and the northeastern United States, hospitals are struggling with an overwhelming burden of patients amid a covid-19 surge that has struck harder and faster than experts expected, even in some of the most highly vaccinated states in the country.

The infections — nearly all driven by the delta variant, not its new cousin omicron — have led to record covid hospitalizations in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. All three states have experienced their biggest surges in cases since the pandemic began and asked for federal help, another first. President Biden announced Tuesday that the government will send emergency medical teams to Vermont and New Hampshire and ambulance crews to Maine.

In Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, covid hospitalizations have soared in recent weeks, although they remain below previous peaks. Yet the winter surge comes at a time when hospitals were already grappling with a staffing shortage combined with an influx of people who had delayed care and an increase in patients battling mental illness. Doctors fear that a large wave of omicron cases could increase the burden even further.

"It's definitely as bad as it's ever been," said Eric Dickson, chief executive of UMass Memorial Health in Worcester. "I can use a New England analogy. Snowstorms, right? You get a bad snowstorm and oh, you deal with it. But you get one on top of that, and now you've got all that snow from before that you have to manage. And that's really what it's feeling like now — it's just piling up."

Interviews with 10 hospital leaders across the region revealed a grave picture. Executives at smaller and midsized hospitals said that it has become exceedingly difficult to secure care at higher-level facilities in the region and they worry that delays in transferring patients could have life-threatening consequences. Several said they were discussing whether they might need to implement standards for rationing care.

In Rhode Island, the president of an association of emergency doctors warned in a letter to the governor last week that the situation had become "acutely untenable" and "any added strain right now will lead to the collapse of the healthcare system."

The emergence of the omicron variant represents a major unknown. The variant is already present across New England and doctors said they expected it to become the dominant strain shortly. They oscillated between optimism that the variant appears to cause milder illness and pessimism that the sheer number of infections could overwhelm hospitals.

Doctors in the region all said that a substantial majority of the patients currently hospitalized with covid — between 60 percent and 80 percent — were unvaccinated. The breakthrough cases that end up in the hospital tend to be milder and are concentrated among older patients and people with other health conditions, they said.

Most state leaders in New England have been reluctant to reimpose mask mandates, but several have announced plans to distribute millions of free tests. On Tuesday, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R) said he was activating up to 500 members of the National Guard to assist stretched hospitals.

The recent experience of states in New England is especially dispiriting given their vaccination rates. In Vermont, long lauded for its handling of the pandemic, 77 percent of the population is fully vaccinated, compared with nearly 62 percent nationwide. In Maine, the same figure is 75 percent. In Massachusetts, it's 74 percent.

This fall, as colder weather pushed people indoors and children returned to school, transmission began to accelerate. In places such as Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, which were relatively unscathed by previous surges, there was also a lower level of prior exposure to the virus. Meanwhile, vaccine-induced immunity was waning in those who had flocked to get their shots early in 2021.

Matthew Fox, an epidemiologist at Boston University, emphasized that vaccines are "still very effective" at preventing serious illness and death. But when it comes to vaccines preventing infections, "we thought it would be a greater benefit than we're observing."

Fox said that difference could be due to waning immunity, or to the delta variant itself, which emerged after vaccines were developed. "If you put it all together, it's just more transmission than we would have liked," he said. The highly contagious omicron variant, meanwhile, can spread among people who are fully vaccinated and boosted.

The high vaccination rates in places such as Vermont and Maine masked considerable variations at the county level, experts said. "People say, 'Oh, Maine's doing really well,' but when you peel the onion layers, what you see is two states," said Dora Anne Mills, chief health improvement officer at MaineHealth. While 83 percent of the population in Cumberland county — home to the city of Portland — is fully vaccinated, that same figure slides to below or near 60 percent in several predominantly rural counties.

Mills said her group of hospitals had scrambled to find more space — canceling elective surgeries, treating patients in recovery rooms for the first time — but she was anxious about the coming weeks because "we could very well be finding out what the limit of that capacity is."

Nirav Shah, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, echoed that sentiment. "It is not out of the realm of possibility that we will approach a time where ICU beds will not be available," Shah recently told the Portland Press Herald. "Not just for covid patients but for any patient." He said the state is making plans to avoid that situation, which he likened to a "big pileup on the highway."

In neighboring New Hampshire, where vaccination rates are lower, hospitals have been flooded with covid patients. Jocelyn Caple is chief medical officer of Valley Regional Hospital, a 21-bed facility in Claremont. She said that 50 percent or more of her beds on any given day are now taken up by patients with covid. Her greatest concern is finding spots for critically ill patients of all kinds at higher-level hospitals. "The sense that the entire system is frozen with an inability to transfer patients around is the most worrisome aspect," Caple said.

In New Hampshire, Maine and Vermont, covid hospitalizations have touched their highest point in the pandemic in December. For New Hampshire, they peaked at 478 according to state figures. In Vermont, they hit 94. That figure may not sound large to other parts of the country, said Trey Dobson, chief medical officer at Southwestern Vermont Medical Center. But in a low-population state like Vermont — home to just 600,000 people in total — it is considerable, he said.

"What we have going right now is what I would call a triple whammy," Dobson said. There is an influx of patients coming into hospitals, both with covid and other ailments; hospitals are having difficulty discharging patients to rehabilitation facilities and nursing homes, which are also strapped for staff; and hospitals can't find beds for patients at larger, more specialized facilities.

Dobson said his hospital has called as far away as Philadelphia to find appropriate beds, and there have been days "where we've made 20 calls and not found someone who could take a patient."

In Massachusetts, the number of patients hospitalized with covid has swelled over the past month, to more than 1,600 as of Monday, compared with 700 a month earlier. Hospitals are struggling to cope with the added burden. Ron Walls, chief operating officer of Mass General Brigham, the state's largest hospital system, said that starting in the late summer, hospitals saw patients returning "in absolutely unprecedented numbers" as the pandemic appeared to recede. The surge in covid cases is "stressing an already stressed system," Walls said.

Mark Keroack, the chief executive of Baystate Health, the main hospital system in the western part of Massachusetts, said his facilities are licensed to treat 998 patients at a time. During the past month, however, the number of patients admitted jumped to as high as 1,200. The hospitals are now 10 percentage points over capacity on a regular basis — something he has never seen before.

Baystate is the only health-care provider in its part of the state that offers the highest level of trauma services. "By God, if we get jammed up to the point where we can't take any more, it's serious," said Keroack. "Where can people go? All the big systems in Massachusetts are fighting the same battle we are." Keroack said that one patient elsewhere in the state who required an advanced life support treatment — pumping and oxygenating a patient's blood outside the body — had been transferred from Massachusetts to Virginia this month.

Meanwhile, Keroack's hospital has begun reviewing its policies on how to ration medical care in an ethical way, also known as crisis standards of care, should that become necessary. "I'm sitting here, staring at the barrel of this gun," he said, referring to the rationing policy. He worries that his hospital might "actually be putting it into use before January is out."

Under such standards, doctors make decisions about how to prioritize resources, including whether to treat someone based on age and severity of illness. No one wants to take that step, said Dickson, the hospital executive in Worcester. But "effectively that's what happens when you run out of space," he said.

His hospital has stopped taking patient transfers except for the most serious trauma cases — people suffering from strokes, heart attacks and brain hemorrhages — and it's become "really hard even to take those," said Dickson. That leaves smaller community hospitals trying to care for patients with other potentially life-threatening surgical emergencies, he said.

Doctors say they feel like they're shouting into a void, delivering news that a pandemic-weary population no longer wants to hear. "You come into work and say, 'This is the worst it's ever been,' " said Dickson. "And then you come in the next day and it's even worse."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 06:00:32 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 23, 2021, 05:59:01 AM
It's just our unvaccinated neighbors' way of wishing us all a very merry Christmas—

In highly vaccinated New England, hospitals are under unprecedented strain as coronavirus surges

By Joanna Slater
Today at 8:00 a.m. EST

On a recent morning, Neil Meehan opened a spreadsheet he has come to dread.

It showed the number of intensive-care beds available in an area of New Hampshire that is home to 350,000 people: two.

A day earlier, there was just one. Very often there are none.

Meehan, the chief physician executive at Exeter Hospital, has worked in emergency medicine for nearly three decades. He has lost track of the number of unprecedented things he has witnessed during this second pandemic winter as virus cases and hospitalizations in the state hit record highs.

His hospital has canceled elective surgeries and placed adult patients in pediatric wards. There are members of the National Guard carrying out support tasks. One seriously ill patient had to wait a week for a transfer to a larger hospital that could treat his condition, a move that normally would have taken hours.

"You have duress in the system that I have never seen before," said Meehan, 56.

Across New England and the northeastern United States, hospitals are struggling with an overwhelming burden of patients amid a covid-19 surge that has struck harder and faster than experts expected, even in some of the most highly vaccinated states in the country.

The infections — nearly all driven by the delta variant, not its new cousin omicron — have led to record covid hospitalizations in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. All three states have experienced their biggest surges in cases since the pandemic began and asked for federal help, another first. President Biden announced Tuesday that the government will send emergency medical teams to Vermont and New Hampshire and ambulance crews to Maine.

In Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, covid hospitalizations have soared in recent weeks, although they remain below previous peaks. Yet the winter surge comes at a time when hospitals were already grappling with a staffing shortage combined with an influx of people who had delayed care and an increase in patients battling mental illness. Doctors fear that a large wave of omicron cases could increase the burden even further.

"It's definitely as bad as it's ever been," said Eric Dickson, chief executive of UMass Memorial Health in Worcester. "I can use a New England analogy. Snowstorms, right? You get a bad snowstorm and oh, you deal with it. But you get one on top of that, and now you've got all that snow from before that you have to manage. And that's really what it's feeling like now — it's just piling up."

Interviews with 10 hospital leaders across the region revealed a grave picture. Executives at smaller and midsized hospitals said that it has become exceedingly difficult to secure care at higher-level facilities in the region and they worry that delays in transferring patients could have life-threatening consequences. Several said they were discussing whether they might need to implement standards for rationing care.

In Rhode Island, the president of an association of emergency doctors warned in a letter to the governor last week that the situation had become "acutely untenable" and "any added strain right now will lead to the collapse of the healthcare system."

The emergence of the omicron variant represents a major unknown. The variant is already present across New England and doctors said they expected it to become the dominant strain shortly. They oscillated between optimism that the variant appears to cause milder illness and pessimism that the sheer number of infections could overwhelm hospitals.

Doctors in the region all said that a substantial majority of the patients currently hospitalized with covid — between 60 percent and 80 percent — were unvaccinated. The breakthrough cases that end up in the hospital tend to be milder and are concentrated among older patients and people with other health conditions, they said.

Most state leaders in New England have been reluctant to reimpose mask mandates, but several have announced plans to distribute millions of free tests. On Tuesday, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R) said he was activating up to 500 members of the National Guard to assist stretched hospitals.

The recent experience of states in New England is especially dispiriting given their vaccination rates. In Vermont, long lauded for its handling of the pandemic, 77 percent of the population is fully vaccinated, compared with nearly 62 percent nationwide. In Maine, the same figure is 75 percent. In Massachusetts, it's 74 percent.

This fall, as colder weather pushed people indoors and children returned to school, transmission began to accelerate. In places such as Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, which were relatively unscathed by previous surges, there was also a lower level of prior exposure to the virus. Meanwhile, vaccine-induced immunity was waning in those who had flocked to get their shots early in 2021.

Matthew Fox, an epidemiologist at Boston University, emphasized that vaccines are "still very effective" at preventing serious illness and death. But when it comes to vaccines preventing infections, "we thought it would be a greater benefit than we're observing."

Fox said that difference could be due to waning immunity, or to the delta variant itself, which emerged after vaccines were developed. "If you put it all together, it's just more transmission than we would have liked," he said. The highly contagious omicron variant, meanwhile, can spread among people who are fully vaccinated and boosted.

The high vaccination rates in places such as Vermont and Maine masked considerable variations at the county level, experts said. "People say, 'Oh, Maine's doing really well,' but when you peel the onion layers, what you see is two states," said Dora Anne Mills, chief health improvement officer at MaineHealth. While 83 percent of the population in Cumberland county — home to the city of Portland — is fully vaccinated, that same figure slides to below or near 60 percent in several predominantly rural counties.

Mills said her group of hospitals had scrambled to find more space — canceling elective surgeries, treating patients in recovery rooms for the first time — but she was anxious about the coming weeks because "we could very well be finding out what the limit of that capacity is."

Nirav Shah, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, echoed that sentiment. "It is not out of the realm of possibility that we will approach a time where ICU beds will not be available," Shah recently told the Portland Press Herald. "Not just for covid patients but for any patient." He said the state is making plans to avoid that situation, which he likened to a "big pileup on the highway."

In neighboring New Hampshire, where vaccination rates are lower, hospitals have been flooded with covid patients. Jocelyn Caple is chief medical officer of Valley Regional Hospital, a 21-bed facility in Claremont. She said that 50 percent or more of her beds on any given day are now taken up by patients with covid. Her greatest concern is finding spots for critically ill patients of all kinds at higher-level hospitals. "The sense that the entire system is frozen with an inability to transfer patients around is the most worrisome aspect," Caple said.

In New Hampshire, Maine and Vermont, covid hospitalizations have touched their highest point in the pandemic in December. For New Hampshire, they peaked at 478 according to state figures. In Vermont, they hit 94. That figure may not sound large to other parts of the country, said Trey Dobson, chief medical officer at Southwestern Vermont Medical Center. But in a low-population state like Vermont — home to just 600,000 people in total — it is considerable, he said.

"What we have going right now is what I would call a triple whammy," Dobson said. There is an influx of patients coming into hospitals, both with covid and other ailments; hospitals are having difficulty discharging patients to rehabilitation facilities and nursing homes, which are also strapped for staff; and hospitals can't find beds for patients at larger, more specialized facilities.

Dobson said his hospital has called as far away as Philadelphia to find appropriate beds, and there have been days "where we've made 20 calls and not found someone who could take a patient."

In Massachusetts, the number of patients hospitalized with covid has swelled over the past month, to more than 1,600 as of Monday, compared with 700 a month earlier. Hospitals are struggling to cope with the added burden. Ron Walls, chief operating officer of Mass General Brigham, the state's largest hospital system, said that starting in the late summer, hospitals saw patients returning "in absolutely unprecedented numbers" as the pandemic appeared to recede. The surge in covid cases is "stressing an already stressed system," Walls said.

Mark Keroack, the chief executive of Baystate Health, the main hospital system in the western part of Massachusetts, said his facilities are licensed to treat 998 patients at a time. During the past month, however, the number of patients admitted jumped to as high as 1,200. The hospitals are now 10 percentage points over capacity on a regular basis — something he has never seen before.

Baystate is the only health-care provider in its part of the state that offers the highest level of trauma services. "By God, if we get jammed up to the point where we can't take any more, it's serious," said Keroack. "Where can people go? All the big systems in Massachusetts are fighting the same battle we are." Keroack said that one patient elsewhere in the state who required an advanced life support treatment — pumping and oxygenating a patient's blood outside the body — had been transferred from Massachusetts to Virginia this month.

Meanwhile, Keroack's hospital has begun reviewing its policies on how to ration medical care in an ethical way, also known as crisis standards of care, should that become necessary. "I'm sitting here, staring at the barrel of this gun," he said, referring to the rationing policy. He worries that his hospital might "actually be putting it into use before January is out."

Under such standards, doctors make decisions about how to prioritize resources, including whether to treat someone based on age and severity of illness. No one wants to take that step, said Dickson, the hospital executive in Worcester. But "effectively that's what happens when you run out of space," he said.

His hospital has stopped taking patient transfers except for the most serious trauma cases — people suffering from strokes, heart attacks and brain hemorrhages — and it's become "really hard even to take those," said Dickson. That leaves smaller community hospitals trying to care for patients with other potentially life-threatening surgical emergencies, he said.

Doctors say they feel like they're shouting into a void, delivering news that a pandemic-weary population no longer wants to hear. "You come into work and say, 'This is the worst it's ever been,' " said Dickson. "And then you come in the next day and it's even worse."

I'll go ahead and say it: if it's that bad in New England, what are Florida and Texas going to be like?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 06:33:42 AM
Helaine Olen: Covid or no covid, hefty deductibles will continue to discourage individuals from seeking care when ill. And that's the case among many who have insurance. Others have less help. Nearly a quarter of private industry workers in the United States lack paid sick leave, and many workers who have contracted covid have been denied the paid sick leave that was mandated in one of the early coronavirus protection packages. Some employers insist that workers report in until a diagnosis is confirmed — something that can take days, putting other employees at risk.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 06:42:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 22, 2021, 11:20:45 AM
There's something much more interesting than that going on. Somehow, I don't understand how exactly, the left have adopted a rigid authoritarian stance in this pandemic, they talk down or even ignore the costs of NPIs and stress the benefits, maybe to the point of exaggerating the benefits. So people's positions have become all mixed up with where they see themselves on the political spectrum.


There's another thing too.  Some people are scared and they want to see actions like vaccine mandates in the face of what they see as a personal threat, because, rightly or wrongly, the feel they would be safer.

In all honesty, I have effectively seen the opposite, where some left wingers have effectively become libertarians in the face of both this, and with climate change. An effective denial of the concept of societal responsibility, and a belief that any safety regulations are a conspiracy of the elites against the honest worker are straight out of the libertarian playbook.


It is far more disturbing for me to see this with climate change debates, but that is beyond the scope of this thread. Suffice it to say that many have taken a hard line stance that nothing should affect the convenience or lifestyles of the average middle class Westerner.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 06:51:34 AM
The statement, signed by top officials from nine Massachusetts hospitals and health systems ...

Oh, yeah? Well, what do they know?

'We have the tools to turn the tide': While COVID cases soar in Massachusetts, new Omicron data offers promise

By Nick Stoico and Danny McDonald Globe Correspondent and Globe Staff, Updated December 22, 2021, 9:13 p.m.

On a day when Massachusetts reported a single-day record for new COVID-19 cases, two teams of British researchers offered a glimmer of hope that the fast-moving Omicron variant may cause less severe illness than earlier variants, and US regulators authorized the first pill to treat the coronavirus.

Also on Wednesday, researchers in South Africa reported that cases there dropped by 20 percent in the past week, suggesting the country's Omicron-fueled surge of infections may have peaked after about a month.

Still, federal, state, and local officials continue to urge caution ahead of Christmas and are pleading with unvaccinated individuals to get their shots and vaccinated people to get a booster.

While Omicron may lead to less severe symptoms, doctors in Massachusetts say the current surge has pushed health systems to a "crisis point" and hospitals are "nearing full capacity."

"The good news is that we have the tools to turn the tide, but it will take a team effort. It will take a renewed sense of diligence and responsibility from everyone who calls Massachusetts home," the Massachusetts Health & Hospital Association said in a statement Wednesday.

The statement, signed by top officials from nine Massachusetts hospitals and health systems, outlined five crucial steps residents must take to ease the strain on hospitals, including getting vaccinated for both COVID-19 and the flu, plus receiving a COVID-19 booster shot when eligible, wearing a mask in public at all times, and testing for COVID-19 after exposure or developing symptoms.

It remains unclear how long this surge will last. The United States has seen cases rise by about 23 percent in the past 14 days, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Omicron, which early data show to be two to three times more transmissible than the Delta variant, now accounts for more than 70 percent of US infections.

Massachusetts on Wednesday reported 7,817 new confirmed COVID cases — up from 5,133 new cases a week earlier — and 33 new deaths.

The state also reported 56,716 vaccinations, including booster shots, had been administered, the Department of Public Health said. The state also reported that 1,621 patients with COVID-19 were in the hospital. On Wednesday, the seven-day positivity was 7.02 percent.

The state's report came a day after Governor Charlie Baker stopped short of requiring residents to wear masks and instead issued an advisory for people to wear face coverings in public spaces. Baker also announced that he's activated the National Guard to assist overwhelmed hospitals.

On Wednesday, Baker defended his decision to issue the advisory rather than a hard mandate requiring masks. He cited the state's high vaccination numbers as part of his reasoning.

"Now that we have 5 million people in Massachusetts who are vaccinated and almost 2 million people who are boosted, and we have rapid tests, [we should] recognize and understand that our strategy at this point is sort of layered and multidimensional," Baker told GBH during his regular appearance on Boston Public Radio.

State and federal leaders, including Senate President Karen Spilka and US Representative Ayanna Pressley and Senator Edward J. Markey, have called for reimposing a mask mandate.

The absence of a statewide mandate has left local communities scrambling to craft their own rules. Mask mandates so far have been enacted in Boston, Medford, and Watertown.

The five-member Salem Board of Health voted unanimously Wednesday to adopt a mask mandate at least until March, and a vaccine requirement for public spaces and most businesses starting Jan. 15.

"To me it'd be irresponsible to not do something," said Dr. Jeremy Schiller, the board chair, during an emergency meeting held via Zoom. "The things we know work in lieu of shutting down businesses is vaccines and masks. They work."

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu's office on Wednesday said the city, which is averaging 369 new cases per day, has seen an 89 percent increase in positive cases compared to two weeks ago.

Earlier this week, Wu announced a new vaccine mandate for city workers, while eliminating the option to show a weekly negative COVID test in lieu of a vaccine. Wu's mandate also sets a requirement for people to show proof of vaccination for some indoor spaces, including restaurants, gyms, and entertainment centers.

In a radio appearance Wednesday on GBH, Wu said the mandate is necessary to keep patrons at ease and prevent businesses from being forced to shut down as cases continue to climb.

"It's something meant to keep our businesses open," she said.

Wu said she has received racist messages in the wake of the announcement and noted that many come from beyond the borders of the city and state.

"Every time I open my phone, it's another dozen hateful messages, again from folks outside the city and all across the country who feel enraged at Boston taking a leadership role here," Wu said during the interview on GBH's Greater Boston. [emphasis mine—kh]

Wu, the daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, who last month became the first woman and first person of color elected to the mayor's office in Boston's history, said such opposition represented that there is "a clear message that there is still a part of our society, even in this state, even in this city, that really feels like something is being taken away from them . . . that is based in misinformation, it's based in, I think at some level, hatred, and fear, and confusion."

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, reaffirmed his concern for unvaccinated people, who he said are "very vulnerable" to becoming infected, during an interview on MSNBC on Tuesday.

"That's why I worry about the people who refuse to get vaccinated. When you're dealing with any SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 virus, it's a problem," he said. "When you're dealing with one that spreads so rapidly and you are unvaccinated, the virus is going to find you."


In the mix of positive and grim news surrounding the coronavirus this week, the FDA on Wednesday authorized Pfizer's new drug, Paxlovid, the nation's first pill against COVID-19, which individuals will be able to take at home. Though supply for the drug is expected to be limited initially, it may provide an affordable and fast option for treating early COVID-19 infections.

The drug is reportedly highly effective with a nearly 90 percent reduction in hospitalizations and death among patients most likely to suffer severe symptoms.

"The efficacy is high, the side effects are low, and it's oral. It checks all the boxes," Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic told the Associated Press. "You're looking at a 90 percent decreased risk of hospitalization and death in a high-risk group — that's stunning."

Still, the new studies released Wednesday in Britain seem to bolster earlier research that suggests Omicron may not be as harmful as the Delta variant, said Manuel Ascano Jr., a Vanderbilt University biochemist who studies viruses.

"Cautious optimism is perhaps the best way to look at this," he said.

An analysis from the Imperial College London COVID-19 response team estimated hospitalization risks for Omicron cases in England, finding people infected with the variant are around 20 percent less likely to go to the hospital at all than those infected with the Delta variant, and 40 percent less likely to be hospitalized for a night or more.

That analysis included all cases of COVID-19 confirmed by PCR tests in England in the first half of December in which the variant could be identified: 56,000 cases of Omicron and 269,000 cases of Delta.

A separate study out of Scotland, by scientists at the University of Edinburgh and other experts, suggested the risk of hospitalization was two-thirds less with Omicron than Delta.

So, Fauci says the unvaccinated are vulnerable? Who believes him, anyway?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 06:57:49 AM
The opinion pieces out of the "mainstream" center-liberal outlets such as the Atlantic and Politico are very much trending in the direction of a lack of appetite for further measures as we saw in the initial waves, beyond light measures such as indoor dining restrictions, et al. Those publications are generally a good way to see where the wind is blowing- and I think most, including the administration, see it shifting more towards a vaccination-testing-based strategy as there is little appetite for total shutdowns of any industry anymore.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 06:58:26 AM
There's another thing too.  Some people are scared and they want to see actions like vaccine mandates in the face of what they see as a personal threat, because, rightly or wrongly, the feel they would be safer.


Your errors include the imputation of personal fear as the necessary driver and your reducing a worldwide public health crisis to a personal threat. Don't feel bad, Andrei makes these errors all the time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 06:59:38 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 06:57:49 AM
The opinion pieces out of the "mainstream" center-liberal outlets such as the Atlantic and Politico are very much trending in the direction of a lack of appetite for further measures as we saw in the initial waves, beyond light measures such as indoor dining restrictions, et al. Those publications are generally a good way to see where the wind is blowing- and I think most, including the administration, see it shifting more towards a vaccination-testing-based strategy as there is little appetite for total shutdowns of any industry anymore.

Indeed. I do not see a renewed lockdown in Mass.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:17:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 23, 2021, 06:58:26 AM
There's another thing too.  Some people are scared and they want to see actions like vaccine mandates in the face of what they see as a personal threat, because, rightly or wrongly, the feel they would be safer.


Your errors include the imputation of personal fear as the necessary driver and your reducing a worldwide public health crisis to a personal threat. Don't feel bad, Andrei makes these errors all the time.

This is a Trump style argument. Did I say "necessary driver"? If so, where?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:23:12 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 06:42:54 AM
In all honesty, I have effectively seen the opposite, where some left wingers have effectively become libertarians in the face of both this, and with climate change. An effective denial of the concept of societal responsibility, and a belief that any safety regulations are a conspiracy of the elites against the honest worker are straight out of the libertarian playbook.


It is far more disturbing for me to see this with climate change debates, but that is beyond the scope of this thread. Suffice it to say that many have taken a hard line stance that nothing should affect the convenience or lifestyles of the average middle class Westerner.

That's interesting. Just focussing on health, what I haven't come across  is the denial of social responsibility from the left. Maybe you could give me an example online.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 07:25:24 AM
Speculative, but interesting

Booster shots crushed Israel's delta wave. It's betting a fourth dose will do the same to omicron.

By Shira Rubin
Today at 7:17 a.m. EST

TEL AVIV — Israel's decision this week to become the first country to recommend a fourth vaccine dose to combat the highly contagious omicron variant came after health officials concluded that an initial booster had turned the tide this fall against the delta variant.

While they acknowledged that their decision was not based on new scientific data about the omicron variant, officials said they thought it would be prudent to recommend an additional shot because they believe that the ability of the initial booster to prevent infection has been waning over time.

The decision, announced by Israeli officials Tuesday, will make a fourth dose — or second booster — of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine available to people over 60, those with compromised immune systems and employees in the health-care sector. All eligible recipients would need to have had their third dose more than four months prior.

The decision is still awaiting confirmation by Health Ministry Director Nachman Ash before becoming national policy. But facilities across the country are preparing to begin administering the vaccine, with many saying they are ready to start as early as Sunday.

Israel's national coronavirus advisory committee made its recommendation for the fourth dose Tuesday while still gathering data on the omicron variant, saying it does not have the luxury of time. Omicron is believed to be three times more transmissible than previous variants, and while it may be milder — it has not caused massive increases in hospitalizations in the United Kingdom, and infections have plummeted after a surge in South Africa — many Israeli health officials warn that an increase in even moderate cases could overwhelm the country's hospitals.

According to Health Ministry data, 1,400 people tested positive for the coronavirus on Wednesday, 45 percent of of whom were fully vaccinated. In Israel, that means they were at least 12 years old and had received a booster shot at least one week prior, or were within six months of having received a second vaccination shot.

"It's a risk-management issue," said Arnon Afek, deputy director of Sheba Medical Center in central Israel, who is a member of the policy section of the national coronavirus advisory committee.

"The committee looked at the incredibly fast spread of omicron, in the U.K. and other countries, and decided that we do not have the time. They decided that we should work in parallel: First give the recommendation to immunize, and then run the studies," he said.

When Israel last summer launched a campaign for booster shots in response to the delta variant, it based the decision on studies from Israel and abroad showing that vaccine efficacy significantly waned in at-risk people at least five months after they received the second dose.

Experts mostly agree that the boosters — first offered to people over 60 and vulnerable groups in July, then to most of the general population in August — helped crush the delta wave in Israel, allowing the economy and schools to remain open. They credited the vaccine — more than social distancing enforcement, closing the borders or other measures that helped only to delay infection — with making the strategy successful.

In the weeks that followed, Clalit, Israel's largest health provider, found that a third shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 92 percent effective in preventing serious illness and 93 percent effective in preventing hospitalization, compared with decreased protection from only two doses, according to a large-scale study published in the Lancet medical journal in October.

Yasmin Maor, director of the infectious-disease unit at Wolfson Hospital and a member of the advisory committee, said in a news conference Wednesday night that it was "unfortunate" that the booster seems to provide insufficient protection against omicron during Israel's "fifth wave."

"We would have been happy to have a perfect product, but we have to note how many lives were saved because we administered a third vaccine dose," she said.

"When the booster was new, there was little spread of infection. The farther we move away from it, we are seeing double the rate of infection," Boaz Lev, who heads the advisory committee, told reporters. "The price will be higher if we don't vaccinate."

Israel has confirmed at least 341 omicron cases, most of which were traced to travelers who returned to Israel from abroad.

On Monday, Israel added 10 countries, including the United States and Canada, to its "red list" of banned destinations, which also include several European countries and almost all of Africa. The entry of noncitizens has been banned since last month.

Amnon Lahad, chairman of family medicine at Hebrew University, said Israel's fourth-dose campaign was based on "panic," rather than science.

Instead of going forward with the next round of vaccines, he said, Israel should dedicate resources to inoculating the country's estimated 1 million unvaccinated people, many of whom are members of the country's underserved populations and lack easy access to a vaccination facility.
[emphasis mine—kh]

Out of a population of 9.3 million, 6.4 million have received their first shot, 5.8 million their second and 4.1 million their third, according to the Health Ministry.

The towns with the lowest rates are ultra-Orthodox, Arab and lower-income communities.

Israel has recorded more than 8,200 coronavirus-related deaths. It has not confirmed any deaths from the omicron variant.

On Wednesday, the Health Ministry said that a 65-year-old man who died the day before had contracted the delta variant, not omicron as originally reported.

Lahad criticized Israel's policy of classifying documentation from cabinet meetings and other government discussions about coronavirus policy, saying that the "secrecy" was contributing to vaccine hesitancy across the country.

"Israel is behaving like it's in a war," he said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 07:34:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:23:12 AM
That's interesting. Just focussing on health, what I haven't come across  is the denial of social responsibility from the left. Maybe you could give me an example online.

What I see is a mutation of the idea of structural problems and oppression where a) individuals are powerless in the face of structural problems, and b) since the problems are structural and individuals are powerless, it is useless to coerce any individual to do anything at all when the real problem is a conspiracy of the Elites.

I first noticed this in climate change when I saw more and more people take the line that frankly common-sense measures to reduce energy use are portrayed as useless when you hear the common refrain that x companies do y percent of emissions- the implication being that no person should have to do anything or have any change in their middle-class lifestyles and that things like fuel taxes are an elite conspiracy to reduce the quality-of-life of the average person.

Unfortunately, the idea that no person should endure even the slightest inconvenience for the benefit of society at large is foundational to how society actually functions. If nobody is willing to make the slightest sacrifice, you don't have a society, you have a group of individuals- which is the modern libertarian-conservative view of society expressed in the post-Reagan years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:42:35 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 07:34:33 AM

Unfortunately, the idea that no person should endure even the slightest inconvenience for the benefit of society at large is foundational to how society actually functions. If nobody is willing to make the slightest sacrifice, you don't have a society, you have a group of individuals- which is the modern libertarian-conservative view of society expressed in the post-Reagan years.

Not among younger people. I don't know where you are but in the UK younger cohorts, who are relatively safe in the pandemic, suffered all sorts of serious impositions without flinching in 2020 and 2021 to protect older folks.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 07:44:24 AM
Pregnancy apps have become a battleground of vaccine misinformation
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:47:54 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 07:34:33 AM


I first noticed this in climate change when I saw more and more people take the line that frankly common-sense measures to reduce energy use are portrayed as useless when you hear the common refrain that x companies do y percent of emissions- the implication being that no person should have to do anything or have any change in their middle-class lifestyles and that things like fuel taxes are an elite conspiracy to reduce the quality-of-life of the average person.


I think it's maybe the idea that there's no way you (morally] ought to do something something if it only makes a very small difference. This is what we used to call a mistake in moral mathematics - Derek Parfit discusses it brilliantly, and demonstrates fallaciousness, in his Reasons and Persons.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 07:53:51 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:47:54 AM
I think it's maybe the idea that there's no way you (morally] ought to do something something if it only makes a very small difference. This is what we used to call a mistake in moral mathematics - Derek Parfit discusses it brilliantly, and demonstrates fallaciousness, in his Reasons and Persons.

One of my favorite things I've read recently was Hirschman, who coined the tropes of reaction to social change as perversity (i.e. we shouldn't do anything because we might make the problem worse), futility (we shouldn't do anything because the problem is too large for social change to solve), and jeopardy (we shouldn't do anything because it may put previous social gains at risk). More and more I'm seeing this sort of thing pop up in these kinds of debates, though I think this is more common to centrist reaction (centrists love to argue that we shouldn't do anything because we might accidentally make the problem worse) than left/right reaction.


In terms of left-reaction, though, the relevant trope is that any attempt to compel or coerce changes in societal behavior will necessarily result in state and elite violence against poor and minorities, because our enforcement systems are too entrenched in capitalist and racist hierarchies of power.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 07:58:49 AM
Quote from: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 07:53:51 AM


In terms of left-reaction, though, the relevant trope is that any attempt to compel or coerce changes in societal behavior will necessarily result in state and elite violence against poor and minorities, because our enforcement systems are too entrenched in capitalist and racist hierarchies of power.

Actually that's probably true of the London Metropolitan Police. I hope Seattle's better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 23, 2021, 08:00:54 AM
To an extent, that is true, though I don't think it'd be a very good argument against, eg, making arson illegal.


Additionally it doesn't really apply to the handwringing about "shaming" people who refuse to participate in public health measures, when shame is in fact, historically, probably the most common way societies attempt to prevent free riders when an inconvenience has to be borne by everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 23, 2021, 08:32:56 AM
Fauci recommends that you don't invite unvaccinated relatives over for the holidays (https://www.businessinsider.com/fauci-avoid-unvaccinated-relatives-for-holidays-Omicron-variant-2021-12)

Finally, a public health policy one can embrace without reservation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 23, 2021, 09:02:19 AM
I'm not an epidemiologist, so hopefully one of the many epidemiologists on GMG can explain how the world will get to herd immunity soon or soon-ish.  I am not certain what constitutes herd immunity - is it an 80% vaccination rate? - so hopefully that can be cleared up too.  It would also be interesting to know why no large European countries are in the top ten most vaccinated countries.  (The Chinese statistics look to be very accurate and reliable.)

Anyway, the source for this info is the New York Times, so hopefully that passes muster: Tracking Coronavirus Vaccinations Around the World (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html)


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 10:02:53 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 23, 2021, 09:02:19 AM
I'm not an epidemiologist, so hopefully one of the many epidemiologists on GMG can explain how the world will get to herd immunity soon or soon-ish.  I am not certain what constitutes herd immunity - is it an 80% vaccination rate? - so hopefully that can be cleared up too.  It would also be interesting to know why no large European countries are in the top ten most vaccinated countries.  (The Chinese statistics look to be very accurate and reliable.)

Anyway, the source for this info is the New York Times, so hopefully that passes muster: Tracking Coronavirus Vaccinations Around the World (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html)

I think the idea that fully vaccinated = two doses is out of style.

The world may get herd immunity soonish because everyone in the world may soon become infected with omicron, those who live to tell the tale will have some residual immunity for a while, for what its worth. Universal herd immunity is not a panacea.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 23, 2021, 10:09:13 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 10:02:53 AM
I think the idea that fully vaccinated = two doses is out of style.



     This is so, even if GMG epidemiologists say it is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 23, 2021, 10:15:31 AM

     Given that we now know that Jab 3 is better against Omicron than stopping at Jab 2, one can rationally hope that Jab 4 will be better still, especially since the likelihood that a springtime booster will incorporate Omicron specific modification is high.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 23, 2021, 10:22:15 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 23, 2021, 09:02:19 AM
I'm not an epidemiologist, so hopefully one of the many epidemiologists on GMG can explain how the world will get to herd immunity soon or soon-ish.  I am not certain what constitutes herd immunity - is it an 80% vaccination rate? - so hopefully that can be cleared up too.  It would also be interesting to know why no large European countries are in the top ten most vaccinated countries.  (The Chinese statistics look to be very accurate and reliable.)

Anyway, the source for this info is the New York Times, so hopefully that passes muster: Tracking Coronavirus Vaccinations Around the World (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html)

It's rather simple. Herd immunity means that a sufficiently large number of the population is immune to the virus so the R can be kept lower than 1. Danish experts have calculated that this would happen with the delta variant when about 92% of the people were vaccinated. After the emergence of the omikron variant complete herd immunity can't be achieved with the existing vaccines as to the omikron variant because of its high infectiousness and its considerable ability to infect vaccinated people. So other and better vaccines or some degree of restrictions are necessary to keep the R below 1 with the omikron.

If we suppose that neither vaccines nor restrictions existed so that the virus could spread freely in the community, we would probably still not achieve herd immunity , meaning R below 1 (even after a long course with an unmanageable number of infections and fatalities) because of the virus' ability to reinfect individuals after a few months.

The people who reject vaccines account for the most part of the missing % of vaccinated people (well known in the US I think). The other part of unvaccinated people is children, whom we are beginning to vaccinate now, hoping that this may help to keep the R lower.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 23, 2021, 11:00:39 AM
As has been reported, the virus mutates over time. That's what viruses do. The longer we wait before third world countries get vaccines, the more time we give the virus to mutate and (re)infect us.

Getting 3rd, 4th or 5th jabs while shutting poor countries out of the vaccine cycle simply means that we shut the front door to the intruder while letting it enter through the back doors and open windows. It's a vicious circle: the more variants and infections we face, the more clamor for new jabs we hear. Pharmaceutical companies are only too happy to oblige. I don't think there's an easy way out.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 11:21:46 AM
Quote from: André on December 23, 2021, 11:00:39 AM
As has been reported, the virus mutates over time. That's what viruses do. The longer we wait before third world countries get vaccines, the more time we give the virus to mutate and (re)infect us.

Getting 3rd, 4th or 5th jabs while shutting poor countries out of the vaccine cycle simply means that we shut the front door to the intruder while letting it enter through the back doors and open windows. It's a vicious circle: the more variants and infections we face, the more clamor for new jabs we hear. Pharmaceutical companies are only too happy to oblige. I don't think there's an easy way out.




Yes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 23, 2021, 11:22:14 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 23, 2021, 10:22:15 AMIt's rather simple.


Incorrect.


Quote from: André on December 23, 2021, 11:00:39 AMAs has been reported, the virus mutates over time. That's what viruses do. The longer we wait before third world countries get vaccines, the more time we give the virus to mutate and (re)infect us.


There is truth to this, though no one outside this forum uses the phrase "third world countries" anymore.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 11:25:58 AM
If you look at the SA data, where there's very wide immunity to covid-19 through previous delta infection, reinfection with omicron doesn't seem to be causing a great problem in the hospitals at all. This presumably is because the immunity "in the herd" is providing some good protection after reinfection. So, we can reasonably hope that, if the world becomes infected with omicron soon, the survivors will have some improved capacity to resist a serious reaction if they're subsequently re-infected, either with a new variant or an existing one. I think that's the best we can hope for in fact -- the silver lining in the omicron cloud.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 23, 2021, 11:27:30 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 11:25:58 AM
If you look at the SA data, where there's very wide immunity to covid-19 through previous delta infection, reinfection with omicron doesn't seem to be causing a great problem in the hospitals at all. This presumably is because the immunity "in the herd" is providing some good protection after reinfection. So, we can reasonably hope that, if the world becomes infected with omicron soon, the survivors will have some improved capacity to resist a serious reaction if they're subsequently re-infected, either with a new variant or an existing one. I think that's the best we can hope for in fact -- the silver lining in the omicron cloud.


Hope is not a strategy. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 11:30:12 AM
Quote from: André on December 23, 2021, 11:00:39 AM
As has been reported, the virus mutates over time. That's what viruses do. The longer we wait before third world countries get vaccines, the more time we give the virus to mutate and (re)infect us.

Getting 3rd, 4th or 5th jabs while shutting poor countries out of the vaccine cycle simply means that we shut the front door to the intruder while letting it enter through the back doors and open windows. It's a vicious circle: the more variants and infections we face, the more clamor for new jabs we hear. Pharmaceutical companies are only too happy to oblige. I don't think there's an easy way out.

Well if the whole world catches omicron the problem is reduced, because the consequent global protection may well be at least as good as vaccine induced immunity. But there's another point I want to make. The first world's hoarding vaccines isn't necessarily the main problem with getting vaccines out to the whole world -- distribution is a major problem, possibly more important than supply.

Again the distribution problem is circumvented by a global omicron pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 11:32:16 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 23, 2021, 11:27:30 AM

Hope is not a strategy.

As Turandot said

Nella cupa notte
vola un fantasma iridescente.
Sale e dispiega l'ale
sulla nera infinita umanità!
Tutto il mondo l'invoca
e tutto il mondo l'implora!
ma il fantasma sparisce con l'aurora
per rinascere nel cuore!
ed ogni notte nasce
ed ogni giorno muore!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 23, 2021, 11:36:41 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 11:30:12 AM
Well if the whole world catches omicron the problem is reduced, because the consequent global protection may well be at least as good as vaccine induced immunity.

We can hope so, but we don't know concerning the omikron. Many young people with light or no symptoms when infected have a low antibody response, and this may mean low resistence to reinfection.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 23, 2021, 11:43:21 AM
Quote from: André on December 23, 2021, 11:00:39 AM
As has been reported, the virus mutates over time. That's what viruses do. The longer we wait before third world countries get vaccines, the more time we give the virus to mutate and (re)infect us.

That's true, but even if we don't see more serious mutations in the foreseeable future, we are already in trouble with the omikron. We may hope that it causes milder infections than the delta but until now this isn't but conjecture, and we still need to see its behaviour in an European population 60+ in a larger scale.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PM
There's some emerging data to suggest that VE over time of booster shots declines at pretty much the same rate as it does for "full vaccination" with two shots, although with a longer plateau of initial effectiveness. VE seems higher for mRNA vaccines than inactivated virus vaccines, but I haven't yet seen a comprehensive meta-analysis for statistical significance.

The cause is presumably immune escape over time. My gut reaction to this is that mRNA vaccines are not entirely the game changer they were advertised as, at least in this context, and yearly or six-monthly shots will likely be required for the foreseeable future with the continual possibility (which has not yet eventuated) that, as long as the contents of the mRNA "container" remain unchanged, there's the possibility of vaccine-resistant strains emerging. Under those conditions I feel somewhat less inclined to get a booster shot until I see companies start tailoring them to conditions on the ground now, rather than conditions on the ground in March 2020. That said I have another two months until I'm eligible anyway and will wait to see what other data emerge.

Personally speaking I developed symptoms of COVID-19 on Friday (possibly contracting it sometime last week), which I was told was likely Omicron variant based on local seroprevalence; the symptoms match up fairly well (muscle aches/pains, sore throat, cough, etc.). For me it's indistinguishable from the mild cold that would be caused by any other coronavirus at this time of year, but I'm not in any of the at-risk groups (older adults, males, overweight people—or for Omicron specifically, infants). This hasn't really disrupted my routine, since I already worked from home and the symptoms do not prevent me from being mobile and active—in fact I'm walking more than usual, just due to the fact that I can't run errands outside anymore (no grocery shopping, no public transit, etc.) but get stir crazy at home.

This doesn't prove Omicron is a "mild" variant; I know a number of other people who've had it and who were also not strongly affected, but people I know tend to skew younger and healthier. And yes, this is a breakthrough infection, but I likely wouldn't have contracted it at all in most circumstances; however, since moving back to New York my diet has been severely disrupted, so my health hasn't been as good in general. That is an untestable hypothesis obviously, but hyperglycaemia is known to correlate with increased rate of COVID-19 infection, severity of COVID-19 illness, and death from or exacerbated by COVID-19, and hyperglycaemia can be a result of a high-calorie diet. My blood sugar levels are in the normal range, but it's not out of the question that consuming mostly processed/prepared foods and energy drinks for several months might have made me more vulnerable.

The immune response to this variant does not seem to confer long-term immunity—though we obviously don't have long-term population-scale data, only statistical models—so I won't be too surprised if I catch it again at some point.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on December 23, 2021, 12:35:30 PM
Quote from: Todd on December 23, 2021, 11:27:30 AM

Hope is not a strategy.

However, a strategy should give hope.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 23, 2021, 12:41:12 PM
Quote from: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PM
There's some emerging data to suggest that VE over time of booster shots declines at pretty much the same rate as it does for "full vaccination" with two shots, although with a longer plateau of initial effectiveness. VE seems higher for mRNA vaccines than inactivated virus vaccines, but I haven't yet seen a comprehensive meta-analysis for statistical significance.

The cause is presumably immune escape over time. My gut reaction to this is that mRNA vaccines are not entirely the game changer they were advertised as, at least in this context, and yearly or six-monthly shots will likely be required for the foreseeable future with the continual possibility (which has not yet eventuated) that, as long as the contents of the mRNA "container" remain unchanged, there's the possibility of vaccine-resistant strains emerging. Under those conditions I feel somewhat less inclined to get a booster shot until I see companies start tailoring them to conditions on the ground now, rather than conditions on the ground in March 2020. That said I have another two months until I'm eligible anyway and will wait to see what other data emerge.

Personally speaking I developed symptoms of COVID-19 on Friday (possibly contracting it sometime last week), which I was told was likely Omicron variant based on local seroprevalence; the symptoms match up fairly well (muscle aches/pains, sore throat, cough, etc.). For me it's indistinguishable from the mild cold that would be caused by any other coronavirus at this time of year, but I'm not in any of the at-risk groups (older adults, males, overweight people—or for Omicron specifically, infants). This hasn't really disrupted my routine, since I already worked from home and the symptoms do not prevent me from being mobile and active—in fact I'm walking more than usual, just due to the fact that I can't run errands outside anymore (no grocery shopping, no public transit, etc.) but get stir crazy at home.

This doesn't prove Omicron is a "mild" variant; I know a number of other people who've had it and who were also not strongly affected, but people I know tend to skew younger and healthier. And yes, this is a breakthrough infection, but I likely wouldn't have contracted it at all in most circumstances; however, since moving back to New York my diet has been severely disrupted, so my health hasn't been as good in general. That is an untestable hypothesis obviously, but hyperglycaemia is known to correlate with increased rate of COVID-19 infection, severity of COVID-19 illness, and death from or exacerbated by COVID-19, and hyperglycaemia can be a result of a high-calorie diet. My blood sugar levels are in the normal range, but it's not out of the question that consuming mostly processed/prepared foods and energy drinks for several months might have made me more vulnerable.

The immune response to this variant does not seem to confer long-term immunity—though we obviously don't have long-term population-scale data, only statistical models—so I won't be too surprised if I catch it again at some point.

Mend well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 23, 2021, 12:48:40 PM
Quote from: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PM
There's some emerging data to suggest that VE over time of booster shots declines at pretty much the same rate as it does for "full vaccination" with two shots, although with a longer plateau of initial effectiveness. VE seems higher for mRNA vaccines than inactivated virus vaccines, but I haven't yet seen a comprehensive meta-analysis for statistical significance.

The cause is presumably immune escape over time. My gut reaction to this is that mRNA vaccines are not entirely the game changer they were advertised as, at least in this context, and yearly or six-monthly shots will likely be required for the foreseeable future with the continual possibility (which has not yet eventuated) that, as long as the contents of the mRNA "container" remain unchanged, there's the possibility of vaccine-resistant strains emerging. Under those conditions I feel somewhat less inclined to get a booster shot until I see companies start tailoring them to conditions on the ground now, rather than conditions on the ground in March 2020. That said I have another two months until I'm eligible anyway and will wait to see what other data emerge.

Personally speaking I developed symptoms of COVID-19 on Friday (possibly contracting it sometime last week), which I was told was likely Omicron variant based on local seroprevalence; the symptoms match up fairly well (muscle aches/pains, sore throat, cough, etc.). For me it's indistinguishable from the mild cold that would be caused by any other coronavirus at this time of year, but I'm not in any of the at-risk groups (older adults, males, overweight people—or for Omicron specifically, infants). This hasn't really disrupted my routine, since I already worked from home and the symptoms do not prevent me from being mobile and active—in fact I'm walking more than usual, just due to the fact that I can't run errands outside anymore (no grocery shopping, no public transit, etc.) but get stir crazy at home.

This doesn't prove Omicron is a "mild" variant; I know a number of other people who've had it and who were also not strongly affected, but people I know tend to skew younger and healthier. And yes, this is a breakthrough infection, but I likely wouldn't have contracted it at all in most circumstances; however, since moving back to New York my diet has been severely disrupted, so my health hasn't been as good in general. That is an untestable hypothesis obviously, but hyperglycaemia is known to correlate with increased rate of COVID-19 infection, severity of COVID-19 illness, and death from or exacerbated by COVID-19, and hyperglycaemia can be a result of a high-calorie diet. My blood sugar levels are in the normal range, but it's not out of the question that consuming mostly processed/prepared foods and energy drinks for several months might have made me more vulnerable.

The immune response to this variant does not seem to confer long-term immunity—though we obviously don't have long-term population-scale data, only statistical models—so I won't be too surprised if I catch it again at some point.
I'm very sorry to hear of your health issues.  Can you get tested anywhere and soon? Or possibly getting ahold of a kit and doing it initially yourself?

May I ask how you ended up eating a high-processed food route?  What changed?  Were there no grocery stores/farmers markets nearby?  Or changes in your home/relationship?  Or issues with food deliveries due to Covid?  Just trying to understand.

Hope that you don't have it and all goes well--truly,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 01:14:46 PM
Quote from: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PM
There's some emerging data to suggest that VE over time of booster shots declines at pretty much the same rate as it does for "full vaccination" with two shots, although with a longer plateau of initial effectiveness. VE seems higher for mRNA vaccines than inactivated virus vaccines, but I haven't yet seen a comprehensive meta-analysis for statistical significance.

The cause is presumably immune escape over time. My gut reaction to this is that mRNA vaccines are not entirely the game changer they were advertised as, at least in this context, and yearly or six-monthly shots will likely be required for the foreseeable future with the continual possibility (which has not yet eventuated) that, as long as the contents of the mRNA "container" remain unchanged, there's the possibility of vaccine-resistant strains emerging. Under those conditions I feel somewhat less inclined to get a booster shot until I see companies start tailoring them to conditions on the ground now, rather than conditions on the ground in March 2020. That said I have another two months until I'm eligible anyway and will wait to see what other data emerge.

Personally speaking I developed symptoms of COVID-19 on Friday (possibly contracting it sometime last week), which I was told was likely Omicron variant based on local seroprevalence; the symptoms match up fairly well (muscle aches/pains, sore throat, cough, etc.). For me it's indistinguishable from the mild cold that would be caused by any other coronavirus at this time of year, but I'm not in any of the at-risk groups (older adults, males, overweight people—or for Omicron specifically, infants). This hasn't really disrupted my routine, since I already worked from home and the symptoms do not prevent me from being mobile and active—in fact I'm walking more than usual, just due to the fact that I can't run errands outside anymore (no grocery shopping, no public transit, etc.) but get stir crazy at home.

This doesn't prove Omicron is a "mild" variant; I know a number of other people who've had it and who were also not strongly affected, but people I know tend to skew younger and healthier. And yes, this is a breakthrough infection, but I likely wouldn't have contracted it at all in most circumstances; however, since moving back to New York my diet has been severely disrupted, so my health hasn't been as good in general. That is an untestable hypothesis obviously, but hyperglycaemia is known to correlate with increased rate of COVID-19 infection, severity of COVID-19 illness, and death from or exacerbated by COVID-19, and hyperglycaemia can be a result of a high-calorie diet. My blood sugar levels are in the normal range, but it's not out of the question that consuming mostly processed/prepared foods and energy drinks for several months might have made me more vulnerable.

The immune response to this variant does not seem to confer long-term immunity—though we obviously don't have long-term population-scale data, only statistical models—so I won't be too surprised if I catch it again at some point.

Look after yourself obvs. Sounds like you need the Jewish penicillin, a nice plate of chicken soup.

(All these people with mild cold like symptoms being asked to self isolate in Winter. What on earth is going to happen?!)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 23, 2021, 02:34:54 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 23, 2021, 12:48:40 PM
I'm very sorry to hear of your health issues.  Can you get tested anywhere and soon?
NYC has free test sites all over the city—that's how I found out in the first place (would have otherwise dismissed this as the usual seasonal cold). It's a 1-6 hour wait at this point due to the surge, though. There's also a company that offers at-home testing, but it's similarly spotty; after I tested positive we booked at-home tests for the two of us (I live with my brother at the moment) for three separate times and only once did anyone show up with testing kits. Luckily my brother did test negative but his exposure means he's not able to visit his girlfriend for the holidays, due to the risk of becoming symptomatic down the line. False negative results for asymptomatic infectees is apparently a known issue for the Omicron variant in particular.

Quote
May I ask how you ended up eating a high-processed food route?  What changed?  Were there no grocery stores/farmers markets nearby?  Or changes in your home/relationship?  Or issues with food deliveries due to Covid?  Just trying to understand.
There's a variety of reasons. There were many factors resulting in a lack of motivation to cook or prepare food (mostly related to mental health, housing situations, or stress), and a few factors resulting in a lack of desire to consume food (a caffeine addiction developed as a way to transition into the workforce; pandemic-related weight gain).

Quote from: Mandryka on December 23, 2021, 01:14:46 PM
Look after yourself obvs. Sounds like you need the Jewish penicillin, a nice plate of chicken soup.
That was my mom's recommendation, of course. Also something about bone broth.

People aren't really isolating even if they are coughing or sneezing; every time I go out for walks the streets are as crowded as ever, at least in this part of town. Of course that probably accounts for some of why the city has 22,000+ new cases each day. I doubt people will take this variant seriously here until death rates become significant, and given the vaccination & seroprevalence rates here that may not ever happen. (People would also take it seriously if a lockdown was instituted, even a partial one, but that presumably won't happen until after the holidays if at all.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 23, 2021, 02:48:14 PM
Quote from: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PMMy gut reaction to this is that mRNA vaccines are not entirely the game changer they were advertised as


I think that is a safe thing to say. 

I hope you feel better soon, and if you do have Covid, whatever the variant, that is passes quickly. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 23, 2021, 05:21:35 PM
Queensland has almost hit the 90% vax mark and because of this decided to open up its borders on Dec 17. The new CHO is an immunologist and has adopted a very different approach to his predeccessor. He understands that herd immunity can exist, especially with the weaker omicron strain and now is the time to move forward. This is what he had to say:

That came after a similar record just the day before with 186 cases, with state Chief Health Officer John Gerrard earlier in the week saying case numbers would grow exponentially.

He went even further on Thursday, pointing out that COVID-19 was going to go right through Queensland, almost certainly in the form of the Omicron variant, and that authorities were not only not trying to stop it, they were counting on it.

"Not only is the spread of this virus inevitable, it is necessary," Dr Gerrard said.

"In order for us to go from the pandemic phase to an endemic phase, the virus has to be widespread. We all have to have immunity."


There are a number of historical precedences for this approach. The obvious one is the 'Spanish Flu' of 1918-21. This flu's strain was a novel one and is an H1N1 variant and as the '1s' in it's name suggests it was, like Covid19, a brand new Flu variant which we had not seen before and therefore had no natural immunity to. Of course it affected much of the worlds population (9000 alone died here in Australia). This flu mutated constantly over the next three or so years and eventually became much milder and endemic as a result. All this without a vaccine suggesting that people built up an immunity. Today, unless you have compromised health, if you get H1N1, your chances of survival are very high because herd immunity has worked. Yearly vaccinations are also useful but the first H1N1 flu vaccine didn't appear until 1938.

It's probable that even if we didn't have Covid vaccines that exactly the same would have happened today and the appearance of the omicron strain appears to support this fact. Another point of interest is that the 'Spanish Flu' pandemic affected young people more than than those who were older and attacking the most healthy in our population speeded up the immunity process as a large majority of those who died had health issues, many of them socio-economically induced. Those included years of poor diet, lack of access to medical facilities, etc. The healthy tended to survive and it was them that contributed to the immune process.

So, unless you are an anti vaxxer, take some comfort in the fact that if you are healthy are vaxxed and have no comorbidities then you are probably safe.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on December 23, 2021, 10:35:06 PM
Quote from: amw on December 23, 2021, 12:24:01 PMPersonally speaking I developed symptoms of COVID-19 on Friday (possibly contracting it sometime last week), which I was told was likely Omicron variant based on local seroprevalence; the symptoms match up fairly well (muscle aches/pains, sore throat, cough, etc.). For me it's indistinguishable from the mild cold that would be caused by any other coronavirus at this time of year, but I'm not in any of the at-risk groups (older adults, males, overweight people—or for Omicron specifically, infants). This hasn't really disrupted my routine, since I already worked from home and the symptoms do not prevent me from being mobile and active—in fact I'm walking more than usual, just due to the fact that I can't run errands outside anymore (no grocery shopping, no public transit, etc.) but get stir crazy at home.

Sorry to hear you have apparently been affected. I hope your symptoms continue to be mild and that you have a rapid recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 23, 2021, 11:05:59 PM
I went into a local CVS store yesterday and noticed that they had several large signs up saying that they didn't have any of the Covid test kits.  I'm guessing that a lot of people bought them with holiday plans in mind?  Or are some folks just buying them to have on hand should they start to feel unwell?  Or were around someone who had tested positive?  Or all of the above?  :-\

Are folks here trying to get ahold of kits?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 24, 2021, 12:24:21 AM
They're very popular and usually sold out here, prices typically 5-8 Euros. There are some options via websites, and a delay in delivering + a handling fee. In the provinces, where test centres can be far away, and among busy families with children, they're of particularly good use, of course. I considered buying some a week ago, but they sold out too quickly. Yet public quick test facilities are just a small bike tour or metro ride away, and free, though there's a good deal of queueing/crowds obviously - my three quick tests this week implied about 45 mins - 45 mins - 15 mins of waiting. As for PCRs, they're upscaling capacity, in a week or so. But if I see the tests for sale here, I'll probably be getting at least one, as a reserve  ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 24, 2021, 02:59:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 24, 2021, 12:24:21 AM
They're very popular and usually sold out here, prices typically 5-8 Euros. There are some options via websites, and a delay in delivering + a handling fee. In the provinces, where test centres can be far away, and among busy families with children, they're of particularly good use, of course. I considered buying some a week ago, but they sold out too quickly. Yet public quick test facilities are just a small bike tour or metro ride away, and free, though there's a good deal of queueing/crowds obviously - my three quick tests this week implied about 45 mins - 45 mins - 15 mins of waiting. As for PCRs, they're upscaling capacity, in a week or so. But if I see the tests for sale here, I'll probably be getting at least one, as a reserve  ...
Probably not a bad idea to get one.  Are the kits all one-test-only?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on December 24, 2021, 03:27:43 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 24, 2021, 02:59:47 AM
Probably not a bad idea to get one.  Are the kits all one-test-only?

PD

The kits we got have two tests in each. Last week, I had no problem finding them at the local CVS and my wife got some next day through Amazon. This week, everyone is all sold out and Amazon won't have them to ship until at least mid-January. I believe it's the combination of the holidays as well as growing concern over increasing numbers of cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 24, 2021, 03:58:34 AM
Quote from: Szykneij on December 24, 2021, 03:27:43 AM
The kits we got have two tests in each. Last week, I had no problem finding them at the local CVS and my wife got some next day through Amazon. This week, everyone is all sold out and Amazon won't have them to ship until at least mid-January. I believe it's the combination of the holidays as well as growing concern over increasing numbers of cases.
Glad that you were able to get some.  I did a bit of quick googling at my end to see where there are and/or will be free testing sites near me.  There are some in local towns and there should be one opening up quite close to me within a few weeks.  I suspect that if worse comes to worse, that I could probably be tested at my local hospital.

I've been checking occasionally on what's been going on in the lead up to the Australian Open (Yes, I know, I know:  I love my tennis!).  Ben Rothenberg posted on Twitter what the rules were that the Australian Open would be operating under in terms of medical exemptions from having received Covid vaccine shots.  They are really strict.  Note:  if a player wishes to apply for a ME, they must do so anonymously.  One of the biggest questions being:  will Novak Djokovic be there?  He has been mum about his vaccination status. It's a bit confusing keeping up with all of the news.  Here are the exemption rules:

https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1473710660794126345

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 24, 2021, 07:24:56 AM
Omicron: Good news, bad news and what it all means (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59769967)

Omicron is less severe
If you catch Omicron then you are less likely to become seriously ill than with previous variants.
Studies from around the world are painting a consistent picture that Omicron is milder than the Delta variant, with a 30% to 70% lower chance of people infected ending up in hospital. Omicron can cause cold-level symptoms such as a sore throat, runny nose and a headache, but that does not mean it will be mild for everyone and some will still be seriously ill.

Changes to the virus seem to have made it less dangerous, but most of the reduced severity is down to immunity as a result of vaccination and previous bouts of Covid.


So, what I get from that is that for the unvaccinated that haven't been infected before, Omicron might be a real threat. Because they are going to catch it, for sure.

BTW I'm surprised that some still keep telling us that viruses have a natural tendency to become more benign. This is a completely bogus assumption since it confuses the phenomenon of mutation (which is completely random), the process of natural selection (which is dependent on the survival rate, for a virus the level of infectiousness and availability of suitable hosts) and the effect of immunisation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 24, 2021, 07:39:05 AM
Quote from: Que on December 24, 2021, 07:24:56 AM
Omicron: Good news, bad news and what it all means (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59769967)

Omicron is less severe
If you catch Omicron then you are less likely to become seriously ill than with previous variants.
Studies from around the world are painting a consistent picture that Omicron is milder than the Delta variant, with a 30% to 70% lower chance of people infected ending up in hospital. Omicron can cause cold-level symptoms such as a sore throat, runny nose and a headache, but that does not mean it will be mild for everyone and some will still be seriously ill.

Changes to the virus seem to have made it less dangerous, but most of the reduced severity is down to immunity as a result of vaccination and previous bouts of Covid.


So, what I get from that is that for the unvaccinated that haven't been infected before, Omicron might be a real threat. Because they are going to catch it, for sure.

Also note that the effect of omicron on older cohorts is not clear at all. Omicron seems to be able to break through vaccine protection against symptoms more easily than delta, and so it is possible that there will be more symptomatic cases amongst older people than there were before. And even if omicron produces less severe disease than delta in general, paradoxically those older cohorts could find themselves in hospital more than they did with delta, because of their vulnerability and because of omicron's ability to cause breakthrough symptoms.

Everything is still shrouded in uncertainty.

(Sorry, gobbledygook again.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 24, 2021, 10:57:37 AM
The town of Danvers (where I serve as choir director) has instituted a mask mandate. This doesn't change anything for our Lessons & Carols, as we have been singing masked all this while.

Nice to read this on Christmas Eve:

Denmark sees initial signs that dire omicron surge can be avoided

By Chico Harlan
Today at 11:19 a.m. EST

Early benchmarks from Denmark on infections and hospitalizations are providing grounds for guarded optimism that highly vaccinated countries might be able to weather the omicron wave.

The developments, coupled with Denmark's speedy rollout of booster shots, have raised hopes the country can avoid the dire surge for which it has been bracing.

"It's too early to relax, but it's encouraging that we are not following the worst-case scenario," said Tyra Grove Krause, the chief epidemiologist at Denmark's State Serum Institute.

Denmark's detailed, nationwide program for coronavirus testing and analysis gives its scientists a trove of real-time data about the pandemic. Because of that — and because it was one of the first countries outside of Africa to witness omicron's explosive potential — it has turned into a European bellwether for what to expect with the omicron variant.

Over the last week, the country has fared better than it was expecting. After surging to record-breaking levels, the number of daily cases has stabilized. Officials recorded 12,500 cases on Thursday, compared to 11,000 late last week.

More important, hospitalizations have come in — so far — on the very low end of what was projected. A week ago, Denmark's government science institute said daily new coronavirus hospital admissions could range between 120 and 250 patients by Christmas Eve. In recent days, daily admissions have hung around 125.

"That is quite promising," Grove Krause said.

The early signals from Denmark don't provide any direct measure on the severity of the variant, one of the key questions in this phase of the pandemic. But they track with other emerging data and studies from Britain and South Africa that suggest omicron is less likely to lead to hospitalization than the delta variant.

Scientists caution that there are still many uncertainties, and that even if omicron is less likely to cause hospitalization, its increased transmissibility means countless sicknesses and disruptions. The virus could also spread so widely that it nonetheless leads to an influx at hospitals.

Concerns remain about the health system in Denmark, Grove Krause said, because omicron infections are disproportionately concentrated among the young. For now, Grove Krause said, temporary school closures and social precautions have helped slow the spread — but the country could see a spike after holiday gatherings that bring together the young and old.

Even as cases have slowed, there are other signs of omicron's potential to cause chaos. Over the last two weeks, the number of cases among health care workers has more than doubled. A weekly government monitoring report said there had been two omicron outbreaks in nursing homes.

Since omicron emerged in November, scientists have been racing to understand its implications and make sense of a variant that's moving far more quickly than its predecessors.

A few data points emerged this week, with one Scottish study suggesting the risk of hospitalization was almost 60 percent less with omicron than delta. Another analysis, conducted by Imperial College London, said people with omicron cases were 20 percent less likely to go the hospital and 40 percent less likely to be hospitalized overnight. And South Africa, the epicenter of the first apparent outbreak, has seen much lower hospitalization rates than in other waves.

It remains unclear whether trends from South Africa — where demographics skew younger — will play out in other parts of the world. It's also unclear whether and to what extent omicron's reduced severity is a feature of the virus itself, or rather a sign of population-level immunity stemming from vaccinations and prior infections.

Compared to delta, omicron is far better at evading vaccines and causing infections in those who have been inoculated. But Denmark's experience shows that a rapid booster rollout might be able to help cut down rising infection numbers. A team of scientists at the State Serum Institute said in a research paper this week that Pfizer-BioNTech booster shots appeared to provide a 55 percent protection against infections, compared to cases in those who had received two doses.

Even if that level of protection dips over time, boosters "can help us through the next months," Grove Krause said.

According to Our World in Data, Denmark has issued the most per capita booster shots of any European Union country. Denmark said in its latest monitoring report, released Thursday, that 36.8 percent of its population had been boosted, more than double the level from two weeks earlier. Overall, 77.2 percent of the country's population has received at least two doses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 24, 2021, 11:49:08 AM
Quote from: Que on December 24, 2021, 07:24:56 AM
BTW I'm surprised that some still keep telling us that viruses have a natural tendency to become more benign. This is a completely bogus assumption since it confuses the phenomenon of mutation (which is completely random), the process of natural selection (which is dependent on the survival rate, for a virus the level of infectiousness and availability of suitable hosts) and the effect of immunisation.
It's rather a misunderstanding. Viruses tend to become more transmissible and less deadly over time, because this is an almost inevitable result of natural selection due to how viruses reproduce; mutations that allow hosts to spread virions more widely and more quickly are likely to outcompete others. (This does not necessarily mean that viruses have to leave their hosts alive and healthy to gain advantages; mutations that grant a virus greater ease of dispersion among hosts, e.g., changing from droplet transmission to aerosol transmission, can be just as effective. But less common.)

Assuming that this makes more transmissible–less deadly viruses benign or harmless is due to people taking Margaret Thatcher too literally. In a population of one million people, assuming completely unchecked spread, a viral strain that infects 5% of the population and has a 10% case fatality rate will cause 5,000 deaths*, exactly the same as a viral strain that infects 25% of the population and has a 2% case fatality rate; but in the latter case, the number of sick—not dead—people likely to require various medical services and (potentially) having to be quarantined will be five times higher. The second scenario thus has a significantly more disruptive effect on society and human life even though any single individual's chance of dying from the virus is five times lower. Human beings, no matter how many quarantine rooms you distribute them into, or how many masks, face shields, etc. you distribute to create barriers between them, are interdependent.

As such, there is no particular reason to treat a more transmissible variant as "good news", or to assume that viruses will eventually evolve to become completely harmless, and even a viral variant that carries an exceptionally low risk of death may still be very dangerous if it is also exceptionally transmissible—especially considering that the frequency of disabling longterm post-viral illnesses has significantly increased over the past five to seven decades and does not appear to correlate strongly with the severity of the viral disease, and these illnesses remain almost entirely unstudied, unaddressed, and disbelieved in by doctors despite this vast increase due to a combination of social factors (medical biases: women being more affected, overweight and sedentary people being more affected, lower-income people being more affected; systemic economic issues: there is no profit motive in studying "new" or "increasingly prevalent" illnesses unless they pose risks of large-scale market volatility or, like cancers, cause death in almost all cases).

* (not really, but simplified here for ease of understanding the arithmetic)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 25, 2021, 02:30:43 PM
Peter Bailey-Wells, Ryan Huddle, Daigo Fujiwara and Amanda Kaufman Globe Staff:

Massachusetts on Friday reported 10,040 new confirmed coronavirus cases, the highest total reported in a single day since the start of the pandemic. It was the third day in a row that the state reported a new single-day high.

The state also reported 32 new confirmed coronavirus deaths and 42,569 vaccinations, including booster shots, had been administered, the Department of Public Health said.

The state also reported that 1,632 patients with COVID-19 were in the hospital. On Friday, the seven-day percent positivity was 8.32 percent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 25, 2021, 03:12:54 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 25, 2021, 03:11:53 PM
What vaccination rate does Mass. have?

Higher than the US average.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 25, 2021, 07:27:40 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 25, 2021, 03:12:54 PM
Higher than the US average.

     The most vaxed are:


Vermont   479,602   77%
Puerto Rico   2,448,200   77%
Guam   126,582   76%
Rhode Island   804,503   76%
Maine   1,014,290   75%
Connecticut   2,649,289   74%
Massachusetts   5,114,904   74%
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 08:18:54 AM
Hong Kong is clinging to 'zero covid' and extreme quarantine. Talent is leaving in droves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 08:34:47 AM
Coronavirus detected in Boston-area waste water soars to new record levels

By Maria Elena Little Endara Globe Correspondent,Updated December 27, 2021, 1 hour ago

The detection of coronavirus in Boston-area waste water has reached record-breaking levels, with the most recent seven-day average soaring past previous record highs set earlier this month.

On Dec. 23, the seven-day average of virus traces in the waste water in the southern sample of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority's territory was 2,574 RNA copies/mL. That's up from 1,136 copies/mL on Dec. 1, meaning the average has increased by 127 percent in the last three weeks.

Waste water testing serves as an early warning sign for a coming COVID-19 surge. Cambridge-based Biobot Analytics, which tests the waste water coming into MWRA's Deer Island treatment plant, has said it has found that the amount of virus in the waste water is correlated with newly diagnosed coronavirus cases four to 10 days later.

The increase in the waste water levels continues a trend that began around late November, but the tests found that the seven-day averages of virus traces in the waste water have risen incredibly fast over the last three weeks.

In the northern sample, which includes the Boston area, the seven-day average rose from 1,328 RNA copies/mL on Dec. 16 to 2,411 copies on Dec. 23, meaning that the average has almost doubled in the last seven days.

Levels of coronavirus in waste water coming from the northern and southern samples of the MWRA's territory have both risen substantially, well beyond levels seen at the height of the deadly winter surge in mid-January 2021, when cases rose to 5,000-plus per day.

In the past several weeks, Massachusetts has seen a spike in COVID-19 cases. On Dec. 24, the state reported 10,040 new confirmed cases, the highest total reported in a single day since the start of the pandemic. It was the third day in a row that the state reported a new single-day high.

Earlier last week, Governor Charlie Baker deployed the National Guard to help hospitals in Massachusetts struggling with staff shortages and ordered them to cancel nonessential surgeries to accommodate a tide of patients sick with COVID and other serious illnesses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 08:49:00 AM
Two Boston researchers propose 'circuit breakers' to stem spread of COVID-19

By Amanda Kaufman Globe Staff, Updated December 27, 2021, 53 minutes ago

Two Boston researchers are calling on the United States to implement a system that would urge local officials to temporarily pause certain activities like indoor dining or large gatherings in order to prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed amid a rise in COVID-19 cases fueled by the Omicron variant.

In a memo to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, two Harvard-affiliated researchers last week proposed the use of "circuit breakers," which are temporary, local restrictions on "high-risk" activities like indoor dining, performances, or non-essential work outside of homes.

"Because many regions are entering this wave with higher hospital censuses (both due to Covid-19 and other conditions) than in previous waves, it is possible that uncontrolled spread of Omicron could quickly overwhelm hospital capacity, despite the existing immunity of the population," Dr. Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital and instructor at Harvard Medical School, and William Hanage, an epidemiology professor at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, wrote in the memo.

The so-called circuit breakers would be triggered once individual regions have met or are approaching certain thresholds, Faust and Hanage said, and might last about five to seven days "but would be unlikely to be necessary for longer than 14 days in order to achieve the stated objective."

"As the risks of Omicron are acute, we fear that any delayed action may be of substantial consequence," Faust and Hanage said.

On Saturday, Faust wrote on Twitter that "several Massachusetts counties are at risk or likely to have already exceeded normal hospital capacity."

Boston was designated as "unsustainable," according to the measure Hanage and Faust are using, "meaning that given current hospital capacity and new daily Covid, there could be a problem soon," Faust said in the tweet.

Faust and Hanage wrote in the letter to Walensky that while they recognize Americans don't want to "disrupt their lives" to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, they believe the population would be willing to and should be asked to, "with the narrow goal of avoiding catastrophic hospital overload and the avoidable deaths and suffering that would otherwise ensue."

In an interview on CNN on Saturday, Faust said that the "circuit breakers" would be temporary restrictions to avoid a situation in which hospitals are overwhelmed, and someone seeking treatment in an emergency situation like a heart attack isn't able to get the life-saving treatment they need.

The measures could include restrictions on large gatherings, dining capacity, or hospital policies, Faust said.

"It's not a lockdown or a shutdown," Faust told CNN. "But it could be a change in our behavior, or go to hospitals to say, 'Look, make some choices about how we use our capacity now, so that we can take a wave that we expect and actually can foresee coming.'"

Dr. Shira Doron, an infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center, said she disagreed with the approach Faust and Hanage have proposed, arguing that economic restrictions put in place to stem the rise in COVID-19 cases can also be harmful.

"Those are things that will cause people to lose their livelihoods, and in some cases permanently," Doron said in an interview last Thursday.

Massachusetts and the country cannot return to the first few months of the pandemic, Doron said, adding that while she is concerned with rising COVID-19 cases, she is simultaneously worried about officials' "knee-jerk response" to the increase in infections and the potential implementation of restrictions that can be detrimental to the population's health and well-being. She cited colleges closing and schools returning to remote learning as examples.

"We can't go back to March of 2020," Doron said of the proposal submitted by Faust and Hanage. "There are certain things that we did then that we can't do again, so we we have to figure out a new way that we deal with rising cases."

Governor Charlie Baker has already implemented a number of measures in Massachusetts hospitals in order to relieve the strain from COVID-19 patients and staff shortages. Last week, Baker directed hospitals to cancel all non-essential surgeries that require patients to stay overnight in order to make beds available for patients with urgent medical needs. He also deployed the National Guard to help hospitals fill gaps in staffing.

COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations are rising in Massachusetts in a winter surge driven by the highly contagious Omicron variant. According to the most recent data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health released Friday, 91 percent of medical and surgical beds are occupied, while 83 percent of intensive care unit beds are filled.

(Disclosure, Jeremy Faust is a fine musician and a friend)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 08:52:07 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/TZhr8Hz03jY
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 11:32:30 AM
Flight disruptions pile up at Logan for fourth day in a row amid nationwide cancellations
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 27, 2021, 12:52:58 PM
https://twitter.com/chrisceohopson/status/1475540064121806856?s=21

The above thread shows how difficult the situation is to read in the UK. There are lots more people in hospital with covid than pre-omicron, but many are there incidentally, asymptomatic even, they've been admitted for other reasons, tested as part of the admissions procedure and found to be positive.

The other side of this is that the impact of omicron on older people is still unclear. Christmas has probably ensured a fair number of them have caught it, so we should know in a couple of weeks max. Note that it now looks as though the delay from infection to hospitalisation is 10 days -- much shorter than before.

Anyway, it looks as though the Government is fairly cool about the situation in England at least-- no more restrictions planned to slow down the infection rate. In my opinion, that's very good news indeed.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 27, 2021, 04:52:57 PM
An interesting take on the mask debate

https://www.traveller.com.au/masks-on-planes-are-useless-especially-when-you-take-them-off-to-eat-h20syd

This has been common knowledge since the pandemic began.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 27, 2021, 05:16:03 PM
Quote from: Holden link=topic= 29665.msg1414310#msg1414310 date=1640656377
An interesting take on the mask debate

https://www.traveller.com.au/masks-on-planes-are-useless-especially-when-you-take-them-off-to-eat-h20syd

This has been common knowledge since the pandemic began.

The article's writer quickly takes her own mask off: « muzzle mandates », « daft protocols », « time for a few fast facts », « all the hysteria »... ::)

Sorry but that kind of posturing does not help. Quite the contrary. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 27, 2021, 06:13:06 PM
Quote from: André on December 27, 2021, 05:16:03 PM
The article's writer quickly takes her own mask off: « muzzle mandates », « daft protocols », « time for a few fast facts », « all the hysteria »... ::)

Sorry but that kind of posturing does not help. Quite the contrary.

Not interested about the writer's posturing, more about the transmission facts she quoted.

One thing I've certainly not seen is a list of what situations create the most to least transmission of Covid19. My understanding is that it's the home environment that's responsible for the largest number of transmissions which raises questions about who, in a household, should isolate. The least is the outdoors obviously.

One thing both Australia and NZ do is list 'places of interest' where someone who is infected has visited. The QR tracing App (which we're all supposed to use) can then contact people who were there and they go and get tested. Surely, this would provide some of the data I've alluded to but we never see it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 27, 2021, 07:44:32 PM

     (https://i.imgur.com/ZGPkDaH.png)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 27, 2021, 07:48:25 PM
Quote from: André on December 27, 2021, 05:16:03 PM
The article's writer quickly takes her own mask off: « muzzle mandates », « daft protocols », « time for a few fast facts », « all the hysteria »... ::)

Sorry but that kind of posturing does not help. Quite the contrary. 

Consider the source, erm, the messenger. "An interesting take." He's a sucker for performative bullshit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vers la flamme on December 28, 2021, 03:08:35 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 20, 2021, 07:05:50 AM
An old friend of mine, who can be both an annoying knowitall, and rather an ass, lectured me last night on how masks supposedly make no difference. /he's down in The Sunshine State, and the lecture sprang from my asking if folks down by him wear masks. Note to self: You may think it's an innocent question, but....

I was just in Florida this past weekend visiting my dad. They do NOT wear masks in Florida. I didn't see a single damn one. People looked at me like I had two heads for wearing one.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 28, 2021, 03:55:09 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on December 28, 2021, 03:08:35 AM
I was just in Florida this past weekend visiting my dad. They do NOT wear masks in Florida. I didn't see a single damn one. People looked at me like I had two heads for wearing one.
Eek!  :-X  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 05:27:48 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on December 28, 2021, 03:08:35 AM
I was just in Florida this past weekend visiting my dad. They do NOT wear masks in Florida. I didn't see a single damn one. People looked at me like I had two heads for wearing one.

Anti-mask propaganda central
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 28, 2021, 07:23:28 AM
There's an anonymized app here in DK you can choose to participate in, which will tell you, if you've been close to an identified virus case for more than 15 minutes. If you get infected, you report it to the app. It's been downloaded by around 40% of the population. But the system is experiencing big problems; I went to another PCR test after Christmas, after such a notification, maybe because of a train ride - and now it gives the same notification once again, but it can only be because of the visit to that test centre (where good distance is kept). People are telling of illogical or delayed notifications. Every single Dane has now been tested 20 times on average, we're past 100 mio of them, and I've had 16 tests this year, partly because my jobs are less social, all were negative.

Scenarios have been very varying regarding the Christmas holiday, between 9,000 and 45,000 daily cases - it was a record-breaking 16,500 yesterday, but 13,000 today. Not expected to go down soon, however - maybe some time in January. Being unvaccinated implies a 5x risk of being hospitalized, statistics show, but if you're vaccinated, you'll have about the same risk of being infected, albeit on a lower sickness level. Re-infected are now 100s daily. We'll know more about Omicron in a week or so.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on December 28, 2021, 08:30:05 AM
The climate in the US certainly seems to suggest a lack of appetite for further restrictions beyond the same emphasis on masks and now testing. I do wonder if they're softly transitioning to see if Omicron is possibly the "end" of the thing.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on December 28, 2021, 08:42:43 AM
Quote from: vers la flamme on December 28, 2021, 03:08:35 AM
I was just in Florida this past weekend visiting my dad. They do NOT wear masks in Florida. I didn't see a single damn one. People looked at me like I had two heads for wearing one.

Not surprised, but the state we live in isn't much better I'm afraid. :-\ Ignorant, dumbass people are rampant in this state.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 10:50:47 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on December 28, 2021, 08:42:43 AM
Not surprised, but the state we live in isn't much better I'm afraid. :-\ Ignorant, dumbass people are rampant in this state.

My sister in Tennessee, God save her, refuses to wear a mask (she's on the disinformation drip) so that she has canceled medical appointments because the doctors' offices are requiring masks on patients.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 11:01:05 AM
Five things about omicron that I want my friends and family to know

By Dan Diamond
Health reporter
December 21, 2021 at 7:36 a.m. EST

As a health reporter who's been writing about coronavirus since early January 2020, I often get questions about the pandemic. But after the omicron variant emerged last month, those questions became more urgent — with some readers complaining of mixed messages about the new variant and existing vaccines — and deeply personal, as friends and family tried to plan their winter holidays.

Over the weekend, I wrote a Facebook post trying to distill what I've heard from experts and officials as they race to fight the new variant. A lightly edited version of that post appears here.

1. Omicron might not be 'mild' for the unvaccinated

The omicron variant is real, and the reports of it being "milder" appear mostly based on the generally mild breakthrough cases in vaccinated and previously infected people.

If you've been vaccinated and boosted, there's reason to expect your omicron infection will lead to minimal symptoms.

If you haven't previously been infected, and you haven't been vaccinated, there's no reason yet to expect a "mild" case.

Experts have warned, again and again: The bulk of the pain will be felt by Americans who remain unvaccinated, have had immunity wane from prior vaccines and are yet to get boosted, or are immunocompromised.

But anyone who swears that omicron will surely lead to a mild case in a vaccinated person is overpromising. Again, there's good reason to expect it, but we don't have the data to know for sure. This variant was only detected a month ago. Researchers are racing to keep up and study it in real-time.

And the picture from overseas isn't always clear, especially because the demographics in southern Africa, where omicron first exploded, don't line up perfectly with the older U.S. population.

2. Brace yourself for a positive test result. Omicron's mutations make it very transmissible.

Many, many people who are vaccinated or previously infected are going to test positive in the next few weeks, given the omicron variant's sheer transmissibility and ability to evade antibodies.

Every expert I've interviewed, including some of the nation's top health officials, has adjusted his or her mind-set and now is mentally bracing to test positive after spending two years dodging the virus. "Breakthrough" cases are going to be normalized in a hurry, if they aren't already.

To put it very simply, while earlier forms of the virus got stopped at your body's front door if you were "fully vaccinated" or previously infected, omicron can get inside. Still, vaccines and boosters hold the power to defang the worst consequences of omicron and fight off infections. It's possible that some folks reading this have omicron right now and don't know it because their immune system is doing such a good job containing the infection and the symptoms are small or nonexistent.

3. This is exactly what boosters are for

Boosters can specifically help by bringing your antibodies back to a level where there are enough of them, like bouncers at a club, to often keep omicron from getting inside.

Underlining that point: Boosters are one of the best tools to fend off omicron, per every study so far.

We also have far better testing than in early 2020 — though the United States dropped the ball on ensuring access to rapid tests, as anyone hunting for a test now has experienced. There is one monoclonal antibody treatment that appears to still work against omicron, but it's in short supply.

4. Expect hospitals to be pushed to their limits

Federal officials are bracing for U.S. infections to skyrocket into January 2022, with numbers that could top 500,000 new cases per day. (The previous peak was 250,000 cases per day in January 2021.) Some experts predict daily case rates that could be much higher, because so many vaccinated Americans are going to test positive, although we may not capture all the data from people taking at-home tests.

Even if only a small percentage of those people need hospital care, it will tax a health system that is already straining under pandemic fatigue and treating cases linked to the older delta variant. It's also going to be a psychological blow after the past two years of fighting the pandemic, and businesses, families and others will surely be racing to adjust plans.

5. Upgrade your mask and think twice about taking risks. This month will be crucial.

Officials hope that the peak of the omicron wave will be over by early February.

A rise in covid cases is followed days later by a rise in hospitalizations, which is followed days later by a rise in deaths. This has been the consistent pattern for two years.

As a result, the next month in America could rival the worst days of the pandemic, as a sheer wave of cases crashes into our country. Every expert I spoke to is cutting back on scheduled plans, and several urged: Don't take risks that could land you in a doctor's office or hospital emergency room at a moment when demand on our health-care system is going to surge.

If you are passing through an airport or train station, you are undoubtedly being exposed to someone with omicron at this point.

As someone who's been boosted and wears an N95 mask indoors, I feel like I'm taking the best precautions I can. I'm also exhausted with the pandemic and had started to get back to hobbies like swimming, going to movies, having dinner with friends.

But for me, the omicron variant means I'm going to pause some of those activities, and I'm going to make sure I've always got a high-quality mask with me to navigate crowds and indoor spaces. Even if infections are inevitable, I don't want to help omicron along, especially until we get more data in the coming weeks. And I don't want to unwittingly get sick and carry an infection to family members this holiday season.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 11:12:59 AM
Rhode Island's Lieutenant Governor tests positive for COVID-19 — 12:40 p.m.
By Brian Amaral, Globe Staff

Rhode Island Lieutenant Governor Sabina Matos has tested positive for COVID-19, she said Tuesday.

Elorza tightens COVID vaccine requirement for Providence city employees, removing option to get tested — 12:07 p.m.
By Brian Amaral, Globe Staff

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza on Tuesday announced that city employees will have to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and will no longer be able to provide proof of a negative virus test.

NYC plans to double COVID testing in schools when students return — 10:39 a.m.
By The New York Times

New York City will double Covid testing in schools when students return in January, Mayor Bill de Blasio said.

De Blasio, Mayor-elect Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul all spoke on Tuesday at a virus briefing of the importance of bringing students back to school in January, for kids and for parents. Schools are the "safest places to be in New York City," de Blasio said.

"Your children are safer in school," Adams said during the briefing. He and de Blasio said they have been working closely planning for Jan. 3, when schools will reopen.

The new approach for schools in January is called "stay safe and stay open," the mayor said. Under his plan, the city plans to distribute at-home testing kits to classrooms when a student tests positive. All students who are asymptomatic and test negative will be able to return to schools. Students will take two at-home tests over the course of seven days, he said.

Hochul said she sent 600,000 rapid tests to the city last week. The state and the city are working to make sure there's no shortage of supply, Hochul said.

Spain sets pandemic record for new cases — 5:27 a.m.
Associated Press

Spain is dealing with the highest ever number of coronavirus infections, with some regions considering further curbs on social life ahead of the end of the year.

Updating pandemic figures for the first time in four days, health authorities reported 214,619 new cases late on Monday, bringing the 14-day national caseload to a pandemic record level of 1,206 new infections per 100,000 residents. At the height of the January surge, which until now was the one that infected most people in Spain, the rate had surged to 900.

The explosive spike is largely blamed on the omicron variant, which scientists say spreads faster than previous strains although the number of infected patients who need hospital care is proportionally less than in previous surges. Official data shows that 7.5% of Spanish hospital beds and 18% of intensive care units are treating COVID-19 patients.

Authorities reported 120 new deaths since Dec. 23.

In response to the soaring caseload, some Spanish regions are now considering restrictions they resisted only a week ago, when authorities only imposed mandatory mask wearing outdoors.

The northern regions of Navarra, Aragón and Cantabria, among others, are now limiting nightlife, imposing curfews or considering caps on members of different households allowed to gather together.

Omicron may reduce Delta infections, South African study shows — 5:00 a.m.
Bloomberg

Infection with the omicron coronavirus variant can also strengthen immunity against the earlier delta strain, reducing the risk of severe disease, according to a paper released by South African scientists.

While omicron has been shown to be highly transmissible and can evade some antibodies, after two weeks of getting symptoms immunity to subsequent infections from the strain rose 14-fold, according to the authors led by Alex Sigal and Khadija Khan of the Durban, South Africa-based Africa Health Research Institute. A smaller improvement was found against delta, they said.

"If we are lucky, omicron is less pathogenic, and this immunity will help push delta out," said Sigal, who has previously found a two-dose course of Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE's Covid-19 shot as well as a previous infection may give stronger protection against omicron.

The latest findings suggest the likelihood of someone infected with omicron being reinfected by delta is limited, reducing the presence of the latter strain. Omicron is the dominant variant in South Africa's fourth wave of infections, delivering record case numbers, and is fast becoming the dominant strain globally.

Delta ripped through the country in July and August, leading to record hospitalization figures. Omicron hasn't yet had such an impact on health services.

The study is based on 15 participants, of which two were excluded as they didn't detectably neutralize omicron, and the data are being submitted to MedRxiv, a preprint medical publication. It has not been peer reviewed.

Expect more shipping chaos as Omicron forces transport workers to quit — 6:47 p.m.
Bloomberg
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 28, 2021, 01:35:41 PM
Reading this topic I often get the impression that some people simply revel în reporting bad news and are upset  if the worst  scenario doesn't happen to be the case...




Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 28, 2021, 01:43:18 PM
Quote from: Florestan on December 28, 2021, 01:35:41 PM
Reading this topic I often get the impression that some people simply revel în reporting bad news and are upset  if the worst  scenario doesn't happen to be the case...

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 28, 2021, 02:31:25 PM
Here's some positive news:

Breakthrough infections generate 'super immunity' to COVID-19, study suggests (https://news.ohsu.edu/2021/12/16/breakthrough-infections-generate-super-immunity-to-covid-19-study-suggests#.Yb6BqIHQ0p4.twitter)

COVID-19 vaccination provides a foundation of protection that's enhanced by breakthrough infection; 'the key is to get vaccinated'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 02:32:58 PM
Quote from: Que on December 28, 2021, 02:31:25 PM
Here's some positive news:

Breakthrough infections generate 'super immunity' to COVID-19, study suggests (https://news.ohsu.edu/2021/12/16/breakthrough-infections-generate-super-immunity-to-covid-19-study-suggests#.Yb6BqIHQ0p4.twitter)

COVID-19 vaccination provides a foundation of protection that's enhanced by breakthrough infection; 'the key is to get vaccinated'


Most interesting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 28, 2021, 03:04:43 PM
I no longer have any COVID-19 symptoms and rapid tests are coming back negative, so I've been heading outdoors a bit more. People have become a bit more serious about wearing masks indoors, and the testing lines are as long as I've ever seen them, but otherwise there seem to have been no significant changes in mobility or habits. Haven't yet ventured onto public transit to check out other neighbourhoods. My case was very mild, much easier than even the average winter cold or flu & not impacting at all on my ability to work etc. I don't know how much damage it might do to someone who was vaccinated but in an at-risk group; there's some statistical data suggesting such people still do have a much lower rate of severe illness from COVID-19-O than the unvaccinated do (or than they might from, e.g., COVID-19-Δ) but it hasn't yet been analysed systematically as far as I know.

Seven-day moving average deaths in this state are up 57% from this time last month, but given that absolute numbers are still low (55 vs. 35) I don't think that figure has a lot of statistical significance. Hospital admissions are up significantly (though lower than the peak in Dec 2020–Feb 2021). Increases in deaths look significant in France, Spain, Italy, Germany, all of which are also likely to be omicron variant. (Average deaths in Germany seem to have peaked at about half the peak of Dec 2020–Feb 2021, around 400 deaths/day vs. 800.)

My view is still that this is not the variant we were waiting for, one mild enough to warrant a complete absence of restrictions, but that seems to be what's happening anyway. I expect some governments will reverse course and introduce new restrictions once hospitals start to get overwhelmed, but the US government seems to just be ignoring the problem, in its time-honoured manner of ignoring all problems until they cause a civil war or economic crisis.

Quote from: Que on December 28, 2021, 02:31:25 PM
Here's some positive news:

Breakthrough infections generate 'super immunity' to COVID-19, study suggests (https://news.ohsu.edu/2021/12/16/breakthrough-infections-generate-super-immunity-to-covid-19-study-suggests#.Yb6BqIHQ0p4.twitter)

COVID-19 vaccination provides a foundation of protection that's enhanced by breakthrough infection; 'the key is to get vaccinated'

That's one data point. But:
Quotethe protective immune response may be broadened through development of variant boosters with antigenic inserts matching the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
This seems a much more common-sense strategy than using repeat doses of the original vaccine formula as booster shots, so I'm glad to see scientists bringing it up. The results were also fairly clear that Δ infection provided almost complete immunity to Δ reinfection, and some immunity to other variants, but infection with other variants did not provide significantly more immunity to Δ infection than the vaccine on its own. One could hypothesise that the immune response to Δ is stronger than the immune response to the other tested variants, with this also accounting for the large number of deaths caused by Δ (i.e., the variant induced autoimmune effects). As such, I do think it's unlikely the results could be generalised to new variants, but I'm sure someone is working to determine that in a lab somewhere as we speak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on December 28, 2021, 03:37:25 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 28, 2021, 10:50:47 AM
My sister in Tennessee, God save her, refuses to wear a mask (she's on the disinformation drip) so that she has canceled medical appointments because the doctors' offices are requiring masks on patients.

Imagine letting some crazy ideology stand in the way of getting a medical appointment. All I can do is shake my head. I'm really fighting a losing battle here, especially since the mask wearing is so few and far between.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 28, 2021, 04:09:51 PM
Quote from: Que on December 28, 2021, 02:31:25 PM
Breakthrough infections generate 'super immunity' to COVID-19, study suggests[/url]

Very well, if you survive.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 05:01:27 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 28, 2021, 04:09:51 PM
Very well, if you survive.  ::)

The key does appear to be, a breakthrough whose effects are mild.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 05:02:32 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on December 28, 2021, 03:37:25 PM
Imagine letting some crazy ideology stand in the way of getting a medical appointment. All I can do is shake my head. I'm really fighting a losing battle here, especially since the mask wearing is so few and far between.

It pains me that she is deaf to any discussion I might offer on the subject.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 28, 2021, 05:08:14 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 28, 2021, 04:09:51 PM
Very well, if you survive.  ::)

Why wouldn't you? The ratio of infection to mortality is incredibly low and this includes the unvaccinated. At this point in time the number of deaths related to actual cases in the UK is 1.2%. If you include the whole population it falls to 0.22%.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 28, 2021, 05:49:56 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 28, 2021, 05:01:27 PM
The key does appear to be, a breakthrough whose effects are mild.

Probably true of the general population. But unfortunately I am - because of pre existing disease - at particular risk of having a serious course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 28, 2021, 05:50:53 PM
Quote from: Holden on December 28, 2021, 05:08:14 PM
Why wouldn't you? The ratio of infection to mortality is incredibly low and this includes the unvaccinated. At this point in time the number of deaths related to actual cases in the UK is 1.2%. If you include the whole population it falls to 0.22%.

Statistics can't be used in individual cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 05:55:36 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 28, 2021, 05:49:56 PM
Probably true of the general population. But unfortunately I am - because of pre existing disease - at particular risk of having a serious course.

Of course, I should not take this piece of news as any sort of encouragement to let omicron in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 28, 2021, 06:00:03 PM
Yes, and therefore I am also very careful in these times where the omicron - not least in Denmark - is spreading rapidly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on December 28, 2021, 07:11:39 PM
As I mentioned there is a growing body of data, although mostly awaiting peer review, let alone meta-analysis. This preprint (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhCazFav1pokFKmsZI5_oqIeH9ofFckR/view) found that Omicron had significantly lower infectiousness of lung and other epithelial tissue compared to bronchial tissue, for example, as well as resulting in much closer-to-normal blood oxygen saturation than Delta or wild-type. These results have matched most of the other preprint results. The authors do mention that pathogenicity tends to decrease linearly whereas transmissibility tends to increase exponentially, and emphasise that it's still likely to be a high-impact event for the health system. However, these results do suggest that different groups of people may be vulnerable to Omicron than to other variants, since this variant does not infect the lungs easily nor significantly impair blood oxygen levels etc. (And we're seeing that on the ground here with the vastly increased rate of child hospitalisation, for example, never previously seen before in the pandemic.) Which comorbidities will be more vulnerable now remains an open question.

It's justified to be extremely cautious if one has any comorbidity but it will also be very difficult to completely avoid Omicron given the exponentially higher transmission. Safest is to assume everyone has it unless they can show two negative antigen tests on subsequent days. (In my neighbourhood at the moment, the test positivity rate is 28%, not counting self-tests. It has plateaued at roughly that rate for the last few days & this is probably where everyone's neighbourhood is going.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 28, 2021, 07:20:47 PM
Quote from: amw on December 28, 2021, 07:11:39 PM
As I mentioned there is a growing body of data, although mostly awaiting peer review, let alone meta-analysis. This preprint (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhCazFav1pokFKmsZI5_oqIeH9ofFckR/view) found that Omicron had significantly lower infectiousness of lung and other epithelial tissue compared to bronchial tissue, for example, as well as resulting in much closer-to-normal blood oxygen saturation than Delta or wild-type. These results have matched most of the other preprint results. The authors do mention that pathogenicity tends to decrease linearly whereas transmissibility tends to increase exponentially, and emphasise that it's still likely to be a high-impact event for the health system. However, these results do suggest that different groups of people may be vulnerable to Omicron than to other variants, since this variant does not infect the lungs easily nor significantly impair blood oxygen levels etc. (And we're seeing that on the ground here with the vastly increased rate of child hospitalisation, for example, never previously seen before in the pandemic.) Which comorbidities will be more vulnerable now remains an open question.

It's justified to be extremely cautious if one has any comorbidity but it will also be very difficult to completely avoid Omicron given the exponentially higher transmission. Safest is to assume everyone has it unless they can show two negative antigen tests on subsequent days. (In my neighbourhood at the moment, the test positivity rate is 28%, not counting self-tests. It has plateaued at roughly that rate for the last few days & this is probably where everyone's neighbourhood is going.)

Thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on December 28, 2021, 10:18:56 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 28, 2021, 05:50:53 PM
Statistics can't be used in individual cases.

Yes, they can! These figures are an indication of your chance, as an individual, of dying from Covid. It doesn't mean that you definitely won't but it certainly looks like you're far more likely to live than die of Covid. Are you vaxxed? If so then your chances got even better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 12:38:28 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 28, 2021, 05:01:27 PM
The key does appear to be, a breakthrough whose effects are mild.

Indeed, we are talking about breakthrough infections of people who have been fully vaccinated
The interesting thing here is that breakthrough infections of fully vaccinated with Omicron are used by sceptics to dismiss the value of previous vaccinations. Apart from evidence that these vaccinations still protect against serious effects of the disease and hospitalisation, now there are indications that this will only reinforce immunity to an unprecedented level if you were previously vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 12:50:14 AM
Quote from: amw on December 28, 2021, 07:11:39 PM
As I mentioned there is a growing body of data, although mostly awaiting peer review, let alone meta-analysis. [...] However, these results do suggest that different groups of people may be vulnerable to Omicron than to other variants, since this variant does not infect the lungs easily nor significantly impair blood oxygen levels etc. (And we're seeing that on the ground here with the vastly increased rate of child hospitalisation, for example, never previously seen before in the pandemic.) Which comorbidities will be more vulnerable now remains an open question.

Good news on the lesser impact of Omicron on the lungs... but the increased effect on children is worrying and reopens the debate (and ends it IMO) on the vaccination of children.

New Omicron variant fills up children's hospitals (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/27/health/covid-kids-hospitals/index.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 01:11:38 AM
Quote from: amw on December 28, 2021, 07:11:39 PM
It's justified to be extremely cautious if one has any comorbidity but it will also be very difficult to completely avoid Omicron given the exponentially higher transmission. Safest is to assume everyone has it unless they can show two negative antigen tests on subsequent days. (In my neighbourhood at the moment, the test positivity rate is 28%, not counting self-tests. It has plateaued at roughly that rate for the last few days & this is probably where everyone's neighbourhood is going.)

In addition to my previous post. Given that Omicron is hard to avoid due to its infectiousness and because it has widely spread,  it is all the better that the vaccinations - even if they were designed for an earlier variant - still offer crucial protection. And this reality has finally gotten through with some people... I live very close to a vaccination location, and I can see the repenting unvaccinated lining up every day.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 12:50:14 AM
Good news on the lesser impact of Omicron on the lungs... but the increased effect on children is worrying and reopens the debate (and ends it IMO) on the vaccination of children.

New Omicron variant fills up children's hospitals (https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/27/health/covid-kids-hospitals/index.html)

I'd like to see some more about this. We are also seeing a rise in paediatric admissions in the UK, but as far as I know (though I'm not certain) most of them are delta. I'm also not clear how many of them are incidental covid admissions.

The topic is so sensitive, a generator of fear and internet clicks and hence ad revenue, that I'm very much inclined to distrust anything I read in the popular press about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 01:30:29 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 01:11:38 AM
In addition to my previous post. Given that Omicron is hard to avoid due to its infectiousness and because it has widely spread,  it is all the better that the vaccinations - even if they were designed for an earlier variant - still offer crucial protection. And this reality has finally gotten through with some people... I live very close to a vaccination location, and I can see the repenting unvaccinated lining up every day.

But surely it's too late! Especially if you've not had any vaccinations already.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 29, 2021, 01:55:27 AM
Quote from: Holden on December 28, 2021, 10:18:56 PM
Yes, they can! These figures are an indication of your chance, as an individual, of dying from Covid. It doesn't mean that you definitely won't but it certainly looks like you're far more likely to live than die of Covid. Are you vaxxed? If so then your chances got even better.

What I mean is, that I have a risk of getting Covid no matter how small or large the risk is, and as I'm particularly susceptible (due to reduced immune competence) my risk of contracting the disease and even of serious disease is obviously large. You can't tell me the real risk, which is rather individual. And if I contract Covid, all that talk about risk and chances makes no real sense in the end.

Of course I'm vaxxed, two full doses and a more recent booster.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 02:07:03 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 01:30:29 AM
But surely it's too late! Especially if you've not had any vaccinations already.

I'm afraid you are right.... Though here the current lockdown buys them a little bit of extra time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 02:12:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 29, 2021, 01:55:27 AM

Of course I'm vaxxed, two full doses and a more recent booster.

That's all you can do. Hopefully after a while group immunity will stop the spread of the virus and significantly reduce the chance of infection. All the best!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on December 29, 2021, 03:49:57 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 02:12:55 AM
That's all you can do. Hopefully after a while group immunity will stop the spread of the virus and significantly reduce the chance of infection. All the best!

Thanks, yes hopefully. You may call me pessimistic, but I 'm not so sure. With the omikron's tendency to reinfections/breakthrough infections it all depends upon the frequency of these manifestations whether R can be kept under 1 or not. Possibly we shall not reach herd immunity until an omikron specific vaccine has been developed. And maybe we shall be in a similar situation next year with an omega variant, which is even more transmissible than the omikron, until also an omega specific vaccine has been developed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 06:38:02 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 12:38:28 AM
Indeed, we are talking about breakthrough infections of people who have been fully vaccinated
The interesting thing here is that breakthrough infections of fully vaccinated with Omicron are used by sceptics to dismiss the value of previous vaccinations.

Why, I have read a snarky post by our own Andrei obliquely to this effect, on this very thread.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 06:39:16 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 01:11:38 AM
In addition to my previous post. Given that Omicron is hard to avoid due to its infectiousness and because it has widely spread,  it is all the better that the vaccinations - even if they were designed for an earlier variant - still offer crucial protection. And this reality has finally gotten through with some people... I live very close to a vaccination location, and I can see the repenting unvaccinated lining up every day.

I wish there were such sensible repentance here in the States.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 06:40:57 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on December 29, 2021, 03:49:57 AM
Thanks, yes hopefully. You may call me pessimistic, but I 'm not so sure. With the omikron's tendency to reinfections/breakthrough infections it all depends upon the frequency of these manifestations whether R can be kept under 1 or not. Possibly we shall not reach herd immunity until an omikron specific vaccine has been developed. And maybe we shall be in a similar situation next year with an omega variant, which is even more transmissible than the omikron, until also an omega specific vaccine has been developed.

Stay safe, friend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 07:48:10 AM
Interesting to see the numbers coming out of France at the moment - presumably they have radically underestimated the extent of the omega epidemic there. This is a country with a good reputation for masking up too - it suggests that if you want to put the breaks on omicron you need quite serious constraints, constraints with immediate economic and social undesirable implications, like restrictions in retail and education. The UK is saying everything's under control because of the high vaccination rate - but France had a high vaccination rate too! Maybe France is having a problem rolling out boosters, though hard to imagine why unless they haven't got the doses (but if not, why not?)

If it isn't omega, if it's delta and due to vaccine wane, then it's pretty poor show. Vaccine wane has been understood since Israel saw it this Summer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 08:54:30 AM
Despite omicron, Covid-19 will become endemic. Here's how. (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22849891/omicron-pandemic-endemic)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on December 29, 2021, 09:02:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on December 29, 2021, 06:38:02 AM
Why, I have read a snarky post by our own Andrei obliquely to this effect, on this very thread.

The protected must be protected from the unprotected by forcing upon the unprotected the protection that doesn't protect the protected.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 09:44:22 AM
Federal court denies Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt's attempt to stop military vaccine mandate
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 29, 2021, 09:52:07 AM
With COVID-19 cases surging, Rockport cancels New Year's Eve celebration

Vermont hopes to give 80,000 at-home COVID-19 tests to parents — 1:34 p.m.

Worcester officials to limit audience sizes at school sporting events, hand out masks daily to staff amid COVID-19 surge — 1:17 p.m.

Baker touts 2 million booster doses jabbed into Mass. residents' arms as COVID-19 battle rages on — 11:29 a.m.

Hospitals brace for increased COVID-19 among children as Omicron spreads — 9:23 a.m.

Amid record infections, France ups pressure on unvaccinated — 7:08 a.m.

WHO: global COVID cases up 11% last week, Omicron risk high — 6:16 a.m.

Massachusetts soars past million case milestone as Omicron sweeps the nation — 9:16 p.m.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 10:02:42 AM
The Dutch govt. has just indicated that there will be two more booster rounds in 2022 and one in 2023.

My hunch is that these "boosters" will in actual fact be a new vaccination round with a vaccine modified to Omicron - if that stays the dominant variant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 10:43:34 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 10:02:42 AM
The Dutch govt. has just indicated that there will be two more booster rounds in 2022 and 2023.

My hunch is that these "boosters" will in actual fact be a new vaccination round with a vaccine modified to Omicron - if that stays the dominant variant.

Interesting move -- to pin hopes in the next couple of years on vaccination rather than other medical interventions. Drugs to stop it getting serious, taken after you've already caught it. 

With all the difficulties getting the population to cooperate with vaccination programmes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 11:04:54 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 10:43:34 AM
Interesting move -- to pin hopes in the next couple of years on vaccination rather than other medical interventions. Drugs to stop it getting serious, taken after you've already caught it. 

With all the difficulties getting the population to cooperate with vaccination programmes.

The problem with these vaccines is that you have to put in your order early: first come, first served...

BTW Although vaccination sceptics are very vocal in the Netherlands, with 85.9% of all adults vaccinated (not taking into account the booster) vaccination acceptance is relatively high.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 29, 2021, 11:07:02 AM
2 mio tests were carried through during the four days around Christmas here in DK, equal to almost 40% of the population - one of the reasons for Denmark topping today's percentage lists of infected.

Surely, more jabs will be coming in 2022.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on December 29, 2021, 11:15:06 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 29, 2021, 11:07:02 AM
2 mio tests were carried through during the four days around Christmas here in DK, equal to almost 40% of the population - one of the reasons for Denmark topping today's percentage lists of infected.

Surely, more jabs will be coming in 2022.
I'm so sorry to hear about the positivity rate, but it's good that you're testing rate is so high--if that makes sense.  As in best to know what's going on.

Trying to recall though, with the kind of tests that they are administering, what is the rate of false results?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 29, 2021, 11:31:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on December 29, 2021, 11:15:06 AM
I'm so sorry to hear about the positivity rate, but it's good that you're testing rate is so high--if that makes sense.  As in best to know what's going on.

Trying to recall though, with the kind of tests that they are administering, what is the rate of false results?

PD

The PCR tests are well up in the 90s-percentages as regards efficiency rate. I've heard the quick tests catching maybe only 55% of positive cases, which is why I took three of them in four days before Christmas; PCRs were booked up, but I got one on the 27th.

At a presser today, it was announced that there has been an official examination of 45 different types of quick tests (presumably including home kits), and the results will be published soon.

As regards the number of hospitalizations, the milder omicron has influenced stats too, in the way that about 25% of the registered ones aren't really hospitalized because of corona, but something else. Before omicron, that share was only 15 - 20%. Of course, the infected still strain the system because of isolation and equipment demands.

It seems that the picture of omicron being milder is consolidated here; but what remains to be seen however, is omicron hitting the elderly, which hasn't been the case that much so far.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on December 29, 2021, 11:35:54 AM
Quote from: Que on December 29, 2021, 10:02:42 AM
The Dutch govt. has just indicated that there will be two more booster rounds in 2022 and 2023.

My hunch is that these "boosters" will in actual fact be a new vaccination round with a vaccine modified to Omicron - if that stays the dominant variant.

Re-re-re-re vaccinating the northern hemisphere while the southern hemisphere remains largely unvaccinated is a recipe for failure. While this virus remains untamed in the other half of the world, the more chances new variants will emerge and travel north, reinfecting us by the back door. Et vogue la galère... :-X
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on December 29, 2021, 11:39:39 AM
Quote from: André on December 29, 2021, 11:35:54 AM
Re-re-re-re vaccinating the northern hemisphere while the southern hemisphere remains largely unvaccinated is a recipe for failure. While this virus remains untamed in the other half of the world, the more chances new variants will emerge and travel north, reinfecting us by the back door. Et vogue la galère... :-X

Probably true, and a problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 29, 2021, 12:13:10 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on December 29, 2021, 11:39:39 AM
Probably true, and a problem.

Agreed. Might we end up with a yearly vaccination round in the wealthy nations - just for the most vulnerable, if we're lucky - while the rest of the world has to rely on naturally acquired immunity/resistance?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 29, 2021, 01:46:25 PM
England gets ready for the big one

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/nhs-england-makes-plans-for-field-hospitals-in-preparation-for-wave-of-omicron-covid-cases-1365680/amp
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on December 30, 2021, 03:30:06 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/OM2VgBm9pTI&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell

Interesting on omicron incidental cases and severity -- best listened to at 2x speed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on December 30, 2021, 12:15:56 PM
Omicron spiking, but hospitalizations 'comparatively low,' CDC director says

NYC to forge ahead with New Year's Eve gathering in Times Square despite record coronavirus infections

CDC warns against taking cruises after 5,000 new coronavirus cases in past 2 weeks
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning so we did the Lateral Flow Tests (obtaining them is a whole other story) and she tested positive. I tested negative but I guess that my chances of catching it are high. Fortunately I had my booster jab (finally) on 21st December so, it should be, more or less, up to full-strength now. Not a great start to the New Year!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 10:38:59 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning

I don't want to sound like a jerk, Jeffrey, but if coughing one morning has become a sign of great concerrn and alarm, then the world has gone madder than I should have thought it has.

Anyway, I wish your wife speedty recovery without any further symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2022, 10:47:14 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning so we did the Lateral Flow Tests (obtaining them is a whole other story) and she tested positive. I tested negative but I guess that my chances of catching it are high. Fortunately I had my booster jab (finally) on 21st December so, it should be, more or less, up to full-strength now. Not a great start to the New Year!

May the missus mend rapidly! And you stay clear.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 01, 2022, 10:52:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning so we did the Lateral Flow Tests (obtaining them is a whole other story) and she tested positive. I tested negative but I guess that my chances of catching it are high. Fortunately I had my booster jab (finally) on 21st December so, it should be, more or less, up to full-strength now. Not a great start to the New Year!

That's a bummer.. I'm hearing reports in my social circle of Covid infections left and right. And that is in a lockdow....
It seems Omicron is even more infectious than suspected, so unless you completely self isolate it will be extremely hard to avoid. But the good news is that the vaccines, and even more so if they have been reinforced with a booster, offer a lot of protection against anything getting serious. So you and your wife have the best possible starting position - a speedy recovery!

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2022, 10:54:55 AM
Scientists predict Omicron will peak in the US in mid-January but still may overwhelm hospitals

By Azeen Ghorayshi New York Times, Updated December 31, 2021, 6:21 p.m.

With the news that South Africa has passed the peak of its coronavirus cases caused by the omicron variant, scientists are projecting that the United States' sharp increase in cases will crest as soon as the middle of January.

Over the past month, the omicron variant has spread around the world with astonishing speed, even among people who are vaccinated or who had recovered from previous infections. On Thursday, the United States surpassed 580,000 cases, beating the record set only a day before.

That is believed to be a vast undercount, because of testing shortages, the popularity of at-home tests and reporting delays over the holidays. What's more, a significant number of people may have asymptomatic infections and never know it.

New estimates from researchers at Columbia University suggest that the United States could peak by Jan. 9 at around 2.5 million cases per week, although that number may go as high as 5.4 million. In New York City, the first U.S. metropolis to see a major surge, the researchers estimated that cases would peak by the first week of the new year.

"It's shocking. It's disturbing," said Jeffrey Shaman, a public health researcher who led the Columbia modeling work. "We're seeing unprecedented numbers of COVID-19 cases."

The variant is significantly milder than delta and other versions of the virus and is far less likely to lead to hospitalizations, according to data from South Africa and preliminary data from Britain released Friday.

Still, the enormous numbers of people getting simultaneously infected could greatly strain hospitals, experts said, especially in places with lower vaccination rates or in places where hospitals are already overburdened. Just how much of a burden the variant will be, however, depends on how quickly it will burn out in particular communities, especially in large cities.

Those complex transmission dynamics have been maddeningly difficult to predict with precision.

Another model, released by a research group from the University of Washington last week, estimated that the United States would reach a peak in cases by the end of January. But even those researchers are now rethinking their projections based on omicron's rapid spread.

"We are realizing right now monitoring the data that the peak is going to come much faster," said Ali Mokdad, a public health researcher at the University of Washington. "My guess is it will happen before mid-January."

The numbers are increasing so quickly that some public health researchers say modeling isn't even necessary to see where things are headed. "You don't even need a model for this," said William Hanage, a public health researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

There are some reasons to think that the variant's behavior in the United States might be different than in other countries. In South Africa, for example, the population is much younger, and a large proportion had been infected by earlier waves of the virus. In Britain, the vaccination rate for older people is much higher than in the United States.

And although omicron causes milder illness than previous variants, surging cases could send more people to the hospital. "The context for all of this is that hospitals are struggling," Hanage said. "We don't have that much spare capacity. And of course, omicron makes that worse."

While South Africa saw a rapid increase in cases followed by a sharp decline, it's unclear whether cases will crest in the United States in a similar fashion. Because of the number of unknowns, including the emergence of new variants and government restrictions aimed at curbing transmission, Shaman's group limits its projections to four to six weeks in the future.

Two things can cause new infections to decline, according to Natalie Dean, a public health researcher at Emory University. The biggest contributor is that the virus can burn through people in certain communities, especially dense cities; when it stops finding people to infect, new cases decline. People may also change their behaviors, whether through societal restrictions or on their own, giving the virus fewer opportunities to find them.

"Our communities are complicated — it doesn't mean that everyone in the community has gotten infected," Dean said. "It's kind of the people who are most connected."

The United States could also see more localized outbreaks, with cases beginning to decline in current hot spots, like New York City and Washington D.C., just as they're beginning to take off elsewhere. That could lead to more of a rounded peak instead of a sharp turnaround, Shaman said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2022, 10:56:26 AM
Quote from: Que on January 01, 2022, 10:52:11 AM
That's a bummer.. I'm hearing reports in my social circle of Covid infections left and right. And that is in a lockdown...

One of my brothers now has infections at home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 01, 2022, 10:58:00 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2022, 10:47:14 AM
May the missus mend rapidly! And you stay clear.

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:07:55 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2022, 10:54:55 AM
With the news that South Africa has passed the peak of its coronavirus cases caused by the omicron variant.

Just had a talk with my cousin and her husband living in South Africa. All restrictions have been lifted. Covid hospitals are mostly empty. Life is back to normal.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:11:40 AM
Quote from: Que on January 01, 2022, 10:52:11 AM
That's a bummer.. I'm hearing reports in my social circle of Covid infections left and right. And that is in a lockdow....
It seems Omicron is even more infectious than suspected, so unless you completely self isolate it will be extremely hard to avoid. But the good news is that the vaccines, and even more so if they have been reinforced with a booster, offer a lot of protection against anything getting serious. So you and your wife have the best possible starting position - a speedy recovery!

That has to make you wonder what the effect of the lockdown actually is. This isn't covered in the UK press as far as I know because, basically, we're not planning to lock down. Presumably the European press is full of careful analysis of their controls, well thought through justifications of their restrictions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2022, 11:12:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:07:55 AM
Just had a talk with my cousin and her husband living in South Africa. All restrictions have been lifted. Covid hospitals are mostly empty. Life is back to normal.



Good!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:13:37 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:11:40 AM
the European press is full of careful analysis of this, well thought through justifications of these measures, fear-mongeriong, panic-inducing bullshit.

Fixed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:15:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:13:37 AM
Fixed.

There's always the Chinese way of course. And we know there's the British way. What's interesting is whether there's a golden mean.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:18:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:15:05 AM
There's always the Chinese way of course. And we know there's the British way. What's interesting is whether there's a golden mean.

The golden mean has always been there, it's simply the way nature works,

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 11:19:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2022, 11:12:14 AM
Good!

I wish we could see the same in Europe and America soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 11:22:54 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 01, 2022, 10:38:59 AM
I don't want to sound like a jerk, Jeffrey, but if coughing one morning has become a sign of great concerrn and alarm, then the world has gone madder than I should have thought it has.

Anyway, I wish your wife speedty recovery without any further symptoms.
Thanks Andrei  :)
It wasn't of great concern but as it's a symptom of Coronavirus I thought that it made sense to do a test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 11:24:45 AM
Thanks guys for the kind thoughts. She hosted the family Zoom call this evening and seems not too bad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 01, 2022, 01:36:51 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:11:40 AM
That has to make you wonder what the effect of the lockdown actually is. This isn't covered in the UK press as far as I know because, basically, we're not planning to lock down. Presumably the European press is full of careful analysis of their controls, well thought through justifications of their restrictions.

The numbers on infections and hospitalisations are still going down, but probably not for long - as was predicted.
The aim was to slow the advance of Omicron down, while speeding up the booster campaign. It seems that that goal will be accomplished. The plan is to get all the willing their booster this month. On a personal note: will get my booster later this week, my wife next weekend.

We're lucky Omicron is not more dangerous than Delta and vaccinations still have sufficient residual effect to avoid serious illness in most cases. Whether Omicron will be as mild for the unvaccinated who never experienced an infection or for those with impaired immunity, still remains to be seen. I hope so, but we will only know in two weeks or so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 01, 2022, 02:30:29 PM
Omicron is taking off here in Qld now that our borders are open. I was booked for a booster on Jan 14 but logic says that the chances of me coming into contact with someone who has Covid19 has substantially increased. With that in mind I'll drive down the the walk in centre in the Gold Coast Convention Centre this morning. Better to be safe than sorry.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 01, 2022, 09:57:01 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2022, 10:47:14 AM
May the missus mend rapidly! And you stay clear.

+ 2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 01, 2022, 10:01:44 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 01, 2022, 11:11:40 AM
That has to make you wonder what the effect of the lockdown actually is.

There is always the unknown factor, which is the behaviour of people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 02, 2022, 12:37:59 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 01, 2022, 10:01:44 PM
There is always the unknown factor, which is the behaviour of people.

Indeed. There are lots of people that are trying to avoid restrictions by organising large private parties (which is illegal) or doing day trips to Belgium or Germany, much to the chagrin of those countries.

I think to early closure of schools during the holidays was very beneficial in slowing down the virus. Because schools are large concentrations of unvaccinated and as such play a key role in the spreading of the virus. There is a familiar pattern in which the virus enters a family through the youngest generation and then moves slowly up towards the elderly. I expect a surge in infections when the schools and day care centres reopen after the XMas holidays.

And then, if Omicron is really that infectious, we are all going to catch it unless we self isolate...
Personally, I will remsin as cautious as I can untill the booster has reached its optimal effect.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 12:41:55 AM
Quote from: Que on January 01, 2022, 01:36:51 PM
speeding up the booster campaign.


https://coronadashboard.government.nl/landelijk/vaccinaties

25% 18+ vaccinated effectively against omicron hospitalisation. People have understood the necessity for adult boosters for weeks. So someone somewhere had made the decision not to accelerate the booster programme, or there's a supply problem.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 12:43:43 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 01, 2022, 10:01:44 PM
There is always the unknown factor, which is the behaviour of people.

In the UK we've found that people voluntary kept their behaviour in check, there was no need to use the law to impose restrictions.

Again this was well understood from the example of Sweden in 2020.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 02, 2022, 12:49:30 AM
Sweden is not considered a success story by Scandinavian standards.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 12:50:45 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 02, 2022, 12:49:30 AM
Sweden is not considered a success story by Scandinavian standards.

But in the first wave, spring 2020, they saw that the propagation could be kept in check without lockdown - that's right isn't it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 02, 2022, 12:57:32 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 12:41:55 AM

https://coronadashboard.government.nl/landelijk/vaccinaties

25% 18+ vaccinated effectively against omicron hospitalisation. People have understood the necessity for adult boosters for weeks. So someone somewhere had made the decision not to accelerate the booster programme, or there's a supply problem.

The problem is they started late - mid November - and slow. A familiar and recurring screw up...
We are seeing the dire consequences of a partly privatised and fully decentralised health care system with "cost efficient" minium capacity...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 01:12:20 AM
Quote from: Que on January 02, 2022, 12:57:32 AM
The problem is they started late - mid November - and slow. A familiar and recurring screw up...
We are seeing the dire consequences of a partly privatised and fully decentralised health care system with "cost efficient" minium capacity...

Yes starting mid November was a major mistake given the evidence from Israel about vaccine wane. I mean, it was predictable in August that delta would kill a lot of older folk if they weren't boosted.

A trait of Boris is that he gets things done. He got Brexit done, and he got vaccines done. When the Tory party believe in something, they don't mess around. They believe in vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 02, 2022, 01:15:17 AM
Fatalities should be the measurement standard here, and Sweden is considered rather catastrophic, way above the other Scandinavian countries in numbers. The Swedish strategy was more mortal, it has even been called a gerontocide.

DK comes second in the number of fatalities, yet, if taking population size in mind, Sweden has more than doubled that. Finland and Norway have a lot less. It must said though, that Sweden's situation seems to have improved up to omicron, with fatalities numbers going down a lot recently, at least so far. Of course, one can expand comparisons; Romania for example has almost 2x the numbers of Sweden, adjusted to population size. Some arguing for Sweden say that a better natural immunity might be there now; on the other hand, they're imposing a few more restrictions due to oncoming omicron. They also test a lot less there.

Norway 1,305 deaths /5.4 mio
Finland 1,564 /5.5 mio
DK 3,272 /5.8 mio
S 15,310 /10.4 mio
Romania 58,779 /19.3 mio
UK 149,154  /67.2 mio





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 02, 2022, 02:03:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 01:12:20 AM
A trait of Boris is that he gets things done. He got Brexit done, and he got vaccines done. When the Tory party believe in something, they don't mess around. They believe in vaccines.

He is reaping the benefits of the NHS.... not a Tory invention!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 02, 2022, 02:04:19 AM
I think this is an interesting article -- UK focussed but the lessons, if they're valid, apply elsewhere. It's the first time, as far as I remember, I've seen a plausible vision for what the world with covid  could look like.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/02/britain-got-it-wrong-on-covid-long-lockdown-did-more-harm-than-good-says-scientist

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 02, 2022, 02:13:48 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 01, 2022, 09:57:01 PM
+ 2
Thank you! She was coughing a lot during the night (I was in the spare room with the cat) but she is not too bad this morning. I gave myself another lateral flow test which was still negative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 02, 2022, 02:37:46 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 02, 2022, 02:13:48 AM
Thank you! She was coughing a lot during the night (I was in the spare room with the cat) but she is not too bad this morning. I gave myself another lateral flow test which was still negative.

You might not get a breakthrough infection.
A colleague's young daughter brought Covid in from school with just a runny nose and some sniffling. Both parents fully (twice) vaccinated. The mum was in bed for almost a week, the dad kept testing negative and never had any symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 02, 2022, 04:22:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning so we did the Lateral Flow Tests (obtaining them is a whole other story) and she tested positive. I tested negative but I guess that my chances of catching it are high. Fortunately I had my booster jab (finally) on 21st December so, it should be, more or less, up to full-strength now. Not a great start to the New Year!

Very sorry to hear this... hopefully her case will prove to be mild and she wil recover quickly. And hopefully you will NOT catch it!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Iota on January 02, 2022, 04:31:22 AM
Quote from: krummholz on January 02, 2022, 04:22:11 AM
Very sorry to hear this... hopefully her case will prove to be mild and she wil recover quickly. And hopefully you will NOT catch it!

+1

Good luck, vandermolen.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2022, 05:06:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 01, 2022, 10:31:16 AM
My wife had a cough this morning so we did the Lateral Flow Tests (obtaining them is a whole other story) and she tested positive. I tested negative but I guess that my chances of catching it are high. Fortunately I had my booster jab (finally) on 21st December so, it should be, more or less, up to full-strength now. Not a great start to the New Year!
Very sorry to hear that Jeffrey.  I hope that she doesn't develop further health issues and recovers quickly and that you don't get it.

How does this effect you returning to school?  And how long is your winter/holiday break for?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2022, 05:07:54 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 01, 2022, 10:56:26 AM
One of my brothers now has infections at home.
Sorry to hear that Karl.  How are he and his family doing?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 02, 2022, 10:31:13 PM
Authorities here in DK now saying that omicron implies only 1/2 possibility of hospitalization, compared to earlier, and that after the current wave, expected to last a couple of months well into February, things should hopefully be back to (relatively) normal, or even almost pre-pandemic. There are at least 6 studies now showing that omicron is milder. Among other things, it tends to go into the throat, but much less into the lungs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 03, 2022, 12:06:05 AM
Thank you guys for the supportive comments - much appreciated. I just took my wife tea in bed (being such a dutiful husband  ;D). There was less coughing during the night as far as I could hear from next door (I mean the room next door, not the house next door  8)). Today she feels like she has the flu and might just stay in bed. I dread to think what would have happened if she hadn't had the vaccines as she already has a compromised immune system. We've ordered two PCR tests from the NHS. Her breathing seems fine and she was doing some gardening yesterday. Karl I hope that your relatives make good progress.
PD As for returning to school I'm not too sure. Certainly it looks like the pupils will need to wear masks in class - maybe me too but I don't like the idea of teaching wearing a mask. We need to take lateral flow tests before going into school. I suspect that I'll end up with some in the class in front of me and some joining the lesson online from home (in various parts of the world). As a technophobe I don't like this very much but am getting used to it. I'll know more at the end of the week when there is a staff meeting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 01:29:16 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 03, 2022, 12:06:05 AM
Thank you guys for the supportive comments - much appreciated. I just took my wife tea in bed (being such a dutiful husband  ;D). There was less coughing during the night as far as I could hear from next door (I mean the room next door, not the house next door  8)). Today she feels like she has the flu and might just stay in bed. I dread to think what would have happened if she hadn't had the vaccines as she already has a compromised immune system. We've ordered two PCR tests from the NHS. Her breathing seems fine and she was doing some gardening yesterday. Karl I hope that your relatives make good progress.
PD As for returning to school I'm not too sure. Certainly it looks like the pupils will need to wear masks in class - maybe me too but I don't like the idea of teaching wearing a mask. We need to take lateral flow tests before going into school. I suspect that I'll end up with some in the class in front of me and some joining the lesson online from home (in various parts of the world). As a technophobe I don't like this very much but am getting used to it. I'll know more at the end of the week when there is a staff meeting.

Ah, sorry to hear this. I don't read the non-music threads, so don't keep up with who has what. Best wishes for a quick and full recovery. Horrid time.

COVID came to town here large style over the holidays. Three of my adult children and two of their partners tested positive between Christmas and New Year, and their mum is positive since yesterday. Our other boy and the fiancé of one of our daughters had only just recovered earlier in December, so apart from me and my wife (we have been fine since our bout in 2020), everyone of us has had it in the last month! Negative lateral flows are trickling in now...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 03, 2022, 06:14:37 AM
Quote from: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 01:29:16 AM
Ah, sorry to hear this. I don't read the non-music threads, so don't keep up with who has what. Best wishes for a quick and full recovery. Horrid time.

COVID came to town here large style over the holidays. Three of my adult children and two of their partners tested positive between Christmas and New Year, and their mum is positive since yesterday. Our other boy and the fiancé of one of our daughters had only just recovered earlier in December, so apart from me and my wife (we have been fine since our bout in 2020), everyone of us has had it in the last month! Negative lateral flows are trickling in now...
Gosh - that sounds full on. I hope that they get better soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 03, 2022, 06:39:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 03, 2022, 12:06:05 AM
Thank you guys for the supportive comments - much appreciated. I just took my wife tea in bed (being such a dutiful husband  ;D). There was less coughing during the night as far as I could hear from next door (I mean the room next door, not the house next door  8)). Today she feels like she has the flu and might just stay in bed. I dread to think what would have happened if she hadn't had the vaccines as she already has a compromised immune system. We've ordered two PCR tests from the NHS. Her breathing seems fine and she was doing some gardening yesterday. Karl I hope that your relatives make good progress.
PD As for returning to school I'm not too sure. Certainly it looks like the pupils will need to wear masks in class - maybe me too but I don't like the idea of teaching wearing a mask. We need to take lateral flow tests before going into school. I suspect that I'll end up with some in the class in front of me and some joining the lesson online from home (in various parts of the world). As a technophobe I don't like this very much but am getting used to it. I'll know more at the end of the week when there is a staff meeting.
I hope that she starts feeling better soon Jeffrey.  I forget what the name of that drug is that is supposed to help folks with Covid feel/heal better?  Is that something that could help her now or is it only prescribed to people that are in such a bad state that they should be hospitalized?

Best wishes to both of you,

PD

Quote from: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 01:29:16 AM
Ah, sorry to hear this. I don't read the non-music threads, so don't keep up with who has what. Best wishes for a quick and full recovery. Horrid time.

COVID came to town here large style over the holidays. Three of my adult children and two of their partners tested positive between Christmas and New Year, and their mum is positive since yesterday. Our other boy and the fiancé of one of our daughters had only just recovered earlier in December, so apart from me and my wife (we have been fine since our bout in 2020), everyone of us has had it in the last month! Negative lateral flows are trickling in now...
Oh, boy Fox!  Glad that they seem to be getting better and quickly!  Were/are all of the cases pretty mild?  And was everyone vaccinated?

Fingers crossed for you and yours,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 07:19:57 AM
Thanks, both. It's been a shame more than anything else, because everyone has been flat out and distanced rather than together. All straighforward cases similar to mild to moderate flu, but then all are mid-twenties through to early thirties and at least doubled vaxxed (apart from my resolutely anti-vax youngest).

My ex wife is mid-fifties and multiple vaxxed, so hopefully she'll ride it out without too much trouble, but we have tickets to see Messiah on Saturday for her, my wife and I, so we are using long sticks to rub decongestants, honey and menthol on her. We shall see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 07:36:42 AM
Quote from: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 07:19:57 AM
Thanks, both. It's been a shame more than anything else, because everyone has been flat out and distanced rather than together. All straighforward cases similar to mild to moderate flu, but then all are mid-twenties through to early thirties and at least doubled vaxxed (apart from my resolutely anti-vax youngest).

My ex wife is mid-fifties and multiple vaxxed, so hopefully she'll ride it out without too much trouble, but we have tickets to see Messiah on Saturday for her, my wife and I, so we are using long sticks to rub decongestants, honey and menthol on her. We shall see.

Warm vibes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 07:40:52 AM
Previously, I had heard that there were cases of COVID in my mom's Home. Yesterday I learnt that she has now tested positive, but she feels only a mild cough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 07:42:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 03, 2022, 07:40:52 AM
Previously, I had heard that there were cases of COVID in my mom's Home. Yesterday I learnt that she has now tested positive, but she feels only a mild cough.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 03, 2022, 07:36:42 AM
Warm vibes!

Cheers, big man. And to you and yours, and a quick recovery for mum, in particular.

Strange times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 03, 2022, 07:43:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 03, 2022, 07:40:52 AM
Previously, I had heard that there were cases of COVID in my mom's Home. Yesterday I learnt that she has now tested positive, but she feels only a mild cough.
Eek!  May it continue to be mild and that she heals quickly!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 07:55:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 03, 2022, 07:43:14 AM
Eek!  May it continue to be mild and that she heals quickly!

PD

Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 07:56:05 AM
Quote from: foxandpeng on January 03, 2022, 07:42:57 AM
Cheers, big man. And to you and yours, and a quick recovery for mum, in particular.

Strange times.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 03, 2022, 01:23:00 PM
I'll be getting my booster in a couple of hours time as Omicron is making it's presence felt here in Qld. The other day I was told about a colleague of mine who has contracted Covid. This is the first human being that I know personally who has had Covid. It's taken over two years for that to happen so the booster is very timely.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 03, 2022, 01:39:12 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 03, 2022, 12:06:05 AM
Thank you guys for the supportive comments - much appreciated. I just took my wife tea in bed (being such a dutiful husband  ;D). There was less coughing during the night as far as I could hear from next door (I mean the room next door, not the house next door  8)). Today she feels like she has the flu and might just stay in bed. I dread to think what would have happened if she hadn't had the vaccines as she already has a compromised immune system. We've ordered two PCR tests from the NHS. Her breathing seems fine and she was doing some gardening yesterday. Karl I hope that your relatives make good progress.
PD As for returning to school I'm not too sure. Certainly it looks like the pupils will need to wear masks in class - maybe me too but I don't like the idea of teaching wearing a mask. We need to take lateral flow tests before going into school. I suspect that I'll end up with some in the class in front of me and some joining the lesson online from home (in various parts of the world). As a technophobe I don't like this very much but am getting used to it. I'll know more at the end of the week when there is a staff meeting.

I don't visit this thread often, but I'm sorry to hear about your wife, Jeffrey. I hope she is feeling much better now. I'm also not feeling well right now --- feeling kind of rutty and have a slight sore throat, but our weather here in Georgia has been so strange. Yesterday, it was warm with spring-like humidity and today it feels more like winter as a cold front has moved our way. This onslaught of warm/cold/warm/cold isn't doing anyone any favors that's for sure! Anyway, I wish you well and I do hope your wife gets over those nasty flu-like symptoms soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 03:03:03 PM
ER providers [in Mass.] are 'overwhelmed' as schools grapple with reopening amid Omicron surge
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 03:04:03 PM
Southeast U.S. poised for a firestorm of omicron cases, with few safeguards in place

Quote from: Fenit NirappilLower vaccination rates and fewer mask and vaccine mandates have created a much different environment for the omicron variant to spread in the South, leaving experts unsure whether outbreaks will end up deadlier than in the North.

Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Mississippi are among the states experiencing the sharpest increases in covid-19 hospitalizations since Christmas, according to data tracked by The Washington Post. And the situation may only get worse, as initial outbreaks in metropolitan areas spread to more poorly vaccinated rural regions.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 03, 2022, 03:53:31 PM
There's also the factor of snowbirds.
Orlando Airport was insanely packed around Christmas, reported on the news zero parking spaces. My flights there and back were both full.
Every year the population noticeably increases this time of year in Florida, you can see it on the roads, even used to know a guy who would snowbird each year and work only during winters. I'd imagine it's similar in the other southern states, even if not as much.
So probably an oversimplified conclusion, even if it could be one factor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2022, 04:19:05 PM
Quote from: greg on January 03, 2022, 03:53:31 PM
There's also the factor of snowbirds.
Orlando Airport was insanely packed around Christmas, reported on the news zero parking spaces. My flights there and back were both full.
Every year the population noticeably increases this time of year in Florida, you can see it on the roads, even used to know a guy who would snowbird each year and work only during winters. I'd imagine it's similar in the other southern states, even if not as much.
So probably an oversimplified conclusion, even if it could be one factor.

Glad you made it there and back.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 04, 2022, 11:34:48 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 03, 2022, 01:39:12 PM
I don't visit this thread often, but I'm sorry to hear about your wife, Jeffrey. I hope she is feeling much better now. I'm also not feeling well right now --- feeling kind of rutty and have a slight sore throat, but our weather here in Georgia has been so strange. Yesterday, it was warm with spring-like humidity and today it feels more like winter as a cold front has moved our way. This onslaught of warm/cold/warm/cold isn't doing anyone any favors that's for sure! Anyway, I wish you well and I do hope your wife gets over those nasty flu-like symptoms soon.
Thanks John. I hope that you feel better soon too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 03:23:06 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 04, 2022, 11:34:48 PM
Thanks John. I hope that you feel better soon too.
How's your wife feeling today Jeffrey?

And John,

How are you doing?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 03:58:22 AM
These are stressful times; best wishes to all of those here, who are currently experiencing problems. Reports here continue to underline a certain, general mildness, but lots of cases, albeit so far lower than the worst scenarios said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 03:58:22 AM
These are stressful times; best wishes to all of those here, who are currently experiencing problems. Reports here continue to underline a certain, general mildness, but lots of cases, albeit so far lower than the worst scenarios said.
Fingers crossed for you!

How are you and your family doing MT?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 04:23:43 AM
The family circle is quite small & we've actually avoided the virus so far, in spite of two teenagers in their school age. This is unusual and mostly due to precautions from most of the family members. But we don't really expect this to continue, yet hope to withstand in January-February, since an elderly member now has to be a lot in contact with the hospital system, has to be driven to far away back and forth, and likely operated thoroughly, plus he has severe lung problems etc. - so a virus now would really be worsening things further.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 05:08:16 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 04:23:43 AM
The family circle is quite small & we've actually avoided the virus so far, in spite of two teenagers in their school age. This is unusual and mostly due to precautions from most of the family members. But we don't really expect this to continue, yet hope to withstand in January-February, since an elderly member now has to be a lot in contact with the hospital system, has to be driven to far away back and forth, and likely operated thoroughly, plus he has severe lung problems etc. - so a virus now would really be worsening things further.
Pleased to hear that you all have avoided the virus so far, but also very sorry to hear about your relative who is ill.  I hope that things go as smoothly as possible with his health care.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 05:10:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 05:08:16 AM
Pleased to hear that you all have avoided the virus so far, but also very sorry to hear about your relative who is ill.  I hope that things go as smoothly as possible with his health care.

PD

Thanks - obviously, he is one of many such cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2022, 05:12:42 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 05:10:03 AM
Thanks - obviously, he is one of many such cases.

Warm vibes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 05:15:23 AM
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2022, 05:38:09 AM
Chicago teachers union, amid omicron, defies city order to return to classrooms (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01/05/covid-omicron-variant-live-updates/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2022, 05:45:18 AM
Meanwhile, down in the Death Cult Belt: Texas governor says thousands of the state's National Guard refused vaccines
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 05, 2022, 05:57:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 05, 2022, 05:45:18 AM
Meanwhile, down in the Death Cult Belt: Texas governor says thousands of the state's National Guard refused vaccines

To quote a well known Dutch economist that led an initiative against general corona related restrictions: "healthy people don't need vaccines".

He passed away last week at the age of 53, three weeks after being tested positive, unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 05, 2022, 07:19:21 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 05, 2022, 05:45:18 AM
Meanwhile, down in the Death Cult Belt: Texas governor says thousands of the state's National Guard refused vaccines

They will all get the disease, because exposure to Omicron is practically unavoidable. Most will remain healthy because they are not elderly or immuno-suppressed (stupidity does not affect the body). If it's true that one covid bout = one vaccination, that will still leave them exposed to future infections through other outbreaks/variants. Maybe the second or third time around their vulnerability to severe illness will sink into their thick skulls.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 05, 2022, 07:27:16 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 03:23:06 AM
How's your wife feeling today Jeffrey?

And John,

How are you doing?

PD

I'm feeling a bit better today. I'm not sure whether I have COVID, but I seem to be exhibiting more symptoms of a cold (a bit of a sore throat, muscle aches et. al.). But today, I just have a bit of a sore throat left, runny nose and a little bit of chest congestion, but this was nothing like it was yesterday, which I felt as if I were struck by a vehicle. :) Thanks for your concern, PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 05, 2022, 07:33:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 03:23:06 AM
How's your wife feeling today Jeffrey?

And John,

How are you doing?

PD
Thanks for asking PD.
Not too bad I think. No more coughing, but she feels tired/exhausted a lot of the time. She's currently asleep in front of the fire in the living room, which is why I'm left to contact my 'cat group' in peace.  :)
All strength to those of you struggling with this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 05, 2022, 07:37:11 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 05, 2022, 07:33:53 AM
Thanks for asking PD.
Not too bad I think. No more coughing, but she feels tired/exhausted a lot of the time. She's currently asleep in front of the fire in the living room, which is why I'm left to contact my 'cat group' in peace.  :)
All strength to those of you struggling with this.

Great to read, Jeffrey. Sounds like it'll be downhill for her and she'll get over it soon. All my best.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 08:15:58 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 05, 2022, 07:33:53 AM
Thanks for asking PD.
Not too bad I think. No more coughing, but she feels tired/exhausted a lot of the time. She's currently asleep in front of the fire in the living room, which is why I'm left to contact my 'cat group' in peace.  :)
All strength to those of you struggling with this.
Please pass along our well wishes...."from the 'cat group".   :)

PD

p.s.  I must admit that sleeping in front of a fire does sound quite restorative; it's worked for many a cat.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 09:21:53 AM
I had sniffles about three weeks ago, and one day of feeling a bit fatigued. Same mild cold I invariably get every year. For all I know it was Covid-19 omicron variant. I could have tried to get tested, but I already work from home, am de-facto socially distanced. I would have had no way to act on a positive test in the unlikely event that it came back. I have my two Moderna vaccine doses from last spring and am due to get my booster tomorrow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 09:33:15 AM
Some say the virus can give a postive test up to 12 weeks afterwards. I haven't investigated further on that, though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 09:36:59 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 09:21:53 AM
I had sniffles about three weeks ago, and one day of feeling a bit fatigued. Same mild cold I invariably get every year. For all I know it was Covid-19 omicron variant. I could have tried to get tested, but I already work from home, am de-facto socially distanced. I would have had no way to act on a positive test in the unlikely event that it came back. I have my two Moderna vaccine doses from last spring and am due to get my booster tomorrow.
Glad that cold(?) was mild and you're back to form.  Good luck with your booster tomorrow!

Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 09:33:15 AM
Some say the virus can give a postive test up to 12 weeks afterwards. I haven't investigated further on that, though.
Twelve weeks?!   ???

i hope that that isn't true!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 09:48:16 AM
It just means that it could be traceable, which would be a good thing under some circumstances (under others maybe not) - not that one is feeling sick or infecting others.

EDIT: one apparently reliable website here says 'for up to 8-12 weeks'. It's a senior organization telling of procedures in society, including hospital admittance options and tests. In DK you can apparently often get a exemption paper, if a prolonged positive test poses a problem for you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 09:53:22 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 09:48:16 AM
It just means that it could be traceable, not that one is feeling sick.

One has to consider which sort of test is being discussed. PCR tests can be extremely sensitive but RNA will not hang around if there is no virus replicating. RNA is notoriously fragile, and there are enzymes floating around the body which efficiently degrade any RNA drifting around. The main technological achievement of the mRNA vaccines is to embed it in a nanoparticle that protects it until the instant it is taken up by a human cell.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 05, 2022, 12:41:28 PM
Prosecutor who opposed COVID vaccine mandates dies after contracting virus (CBS News)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XTzk9RouSY

How can you not see the angle the media is going for with stories like these?
See, this is what you get when oppose vaccine mandates. We will let the world know you died, and feign concern while doing so in order to avoid backlash.
In the video, they say they don't even know if she's vaccinated. So the point isn't that getting vaccinated would have saved her, because they admit they don't know if she was.
Obvious scare tactics in order to manipulate people to submit control of their lives, destiny and personal choices to the government.
Creeping authoritarianism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2022, 01:01:32 PM
Testing indicates hundreds of Cambridge students might have COVID as schools reopen Wednesday

By Travis Andersen, Bianca Vázquez Toness and Martin Finucane Globe Staff, Updated January 5, 2022, 15 minutes ago

Schools in Massachusetts on Wednesday continued to grapple with the Omicron-fueled COVID-19 surge that has driven case counts to record levels and is straining hospitals.

Students in Cambridge headed back to school for the first time since winter break amid great uncertainty. The district had delayed the start of school for two days in an ambitious plan to test all students Monday and review results Tuesday before welcoming children back to class.

When parents woke up Wednesday morning, Cambridge still did not have the individual test results for 3,500 students who were tested.

Officials said pool testing indicated hundreds of students might be infected. But students were allowed to return to classes anyway, a move families questioned.

In a message to parents late Tuesday night, district leaders said 157 out of 362 testing pools were positive.

"This means that there are at least 157 positive individuals, but there could be well over 1,000," Superintendent Victoria Greer wrote.

By mid-morning Wednesday, only 125 individual test results had come back, officials said. It wasn't clear how many were positive.

"If we receive positive results after school starts and your student is in attendance at school, your student will be quarantined at school for immediate pickup," wrote Greer.

Parents took to online groups and Whatsapp lists to decide how to interpret the data and instructions, many opting to keep their kids home Wednesday.

"It doesn't make sense to send in everyone while awaiting results," wrote one parent of a student at the King Open Elementary School. "But if they've notified most of the positive cases then that's another story."

Another parent agreed. "It defeats the whole purpose of the delayed start unless those who tested positive have been notified."

While the schools struggled to deal with COVID-19, the city on Wednesday announced it was amending its masking order for indoor public spaces to include common areas of residential buildings with at least four units as well as common areas of office and laboratory buildings. City officials also said public meetings would be conducted remotely rather than in person. City-sponsored events and gatherings must also be conducted outdoors, with the exception of youth activities or youth athletic programs. The changes go into effect on Friday.

In Boston, where some 1,000 school staffers were absent Tuesday, including more than 400 teachers, Superintendent Brenda Cassellius headed into the classroom Wednesday to pinch-hit for a sick fourth-grade teacher at the Nathan Hale Elementary School in Roxbury.

"I jumped into gear and said I'd clear my calendar," Cassellius told reporters outside the school Wednesday morning.

By late morning Wednesday, school officials had not released the number of staff who were out.

Students in neighboring Watertown were also back at school Wednesday after a rocky post-holiday return. The district had welcomed children back Monday, but after reviewing student COVID test results from that day, the district abruptly canceled school Tuesday.

Massachusetts has been wracked by the COVID-19 pandemic for nearly two years. The toll of confirmed deaths from the diseases is nearing 20,000, and there are several hundred more deaths probably caused by the disease.

Massachusetts has a relatively high vaccination rate. But it is seeing skyrocketing case numbers, and hospitalization levels are nearing those at the peak of last year's surge. Death rates so far have not risen as sharply.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the highly infectious Omicron variant accounted for 94.5 percent of all US COVID-19 cases in the week ending Jan. 1. The formerly predominant Delta variant only accounted for 4.6 percent of cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 05, 2022, 01:42:01 PM
As many of you know, I'm a teacher and our students return to school on Jan 24 - or will they? The current approach of Qld's new CHO is that Omicron is here, it's not going to be controllable unless drastic restrictions are put into place, for 99% of people it's either asymptomatic or very mild so let it run it's course. I agree with him and this would suggest that our students will return on Jan 24, with maybe an indoor mask mandate for all students - not just high schoolers, and with online learning provisions put in place for any who are immuno-compromised.

I'm not sure what happens in your neck of the woods but the rule here is that all indoor venues such as retail outlets and hospitality establishments must have their own QR codes available at entry points and anyone who enters must scan the code. The idea behind this is 'contact tracing' to inform people they have been in the same venue with a confirmed Covid19 patient. As of today, I'm not going to bother based on the following.

1. Getting a PCR test here in Qld is almost impossible as the waiting time in queues is huge so we've been told that if we display mild symptoms to simply stay at home and isolate for a week and allow the system to work with those who are really ill. Now you might be thinking - what about a Rapid Antigen Test (or RAT)? Well, our government, in it's wisdom, didn't think to increase the availability of them before choosing to open the borders. You cannot get a RAT for love nor money anywhere in Qld so you don't know if you have Covid19 or not. Apparently 18 million kits will arrive in the state next week. With the large number of people still isolating, I wonder how quickly they will be delivered?

2 Consider this statement from Qld Health

Queensland contact tracers are to focus on vulnerable settings and will limit publishing exposure sites unless they are venues of high concern, as the Omicron wave is set to peak and COVID cases become unmanageable.

These two states of affair, especially the first, negate any positives of using the QR code check in system.

To go back to a point I made earlier - delivery systems. We are experiencing much longer delivery times due to the Covid case increases (30,000+ active cases in Qld at the moment). I'm wondering if this might hit the food supply chain? Lucky for me I nearly always have a full freezer. I sent a parcel to the US recently. It sat at customs at BNE waiting for an available flight for seven days. It was a return of a faulty piece of equipment using Australia Post. It's replacement is already on its way via FedEx while the one  sent is still on the ground at LAX. A courier company with its own fleet of aircraft makes all the difference. The parcel (a headphone amp) was dispatched on Tuesday and I'll have it by Weds at the latest but probably sooner.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 02:15:31 PM
Quote from: greg on January 05, 2022, 12:41:28 PM
Prosecutor who opposed COVID vaccine mandates dies after contracting virus (CBS News)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XTzk9RouSY

How can you not see the angle the media is going for with stories like these?
See, this is what you get when oppose vaccine mandates. We will let the world know you died, and feign concern while doing so in order to avoid backlash.
In the video, they say they don't even know if she's vaccinated. So the point isn't that getting vaccinated would have saved her, because they admit they don't know if she was.
Obvious scare tactics in order to manipulate people to submit control of their lives, destiny and personal choices to the government.
Creeping authoritarianism.

Numerous other media reports say that the prosecutor's husband revealed that she was unvaccinated at the time of her death.

I agree that these reports of a prominent vaccine opponent or Covid-19 denier dying of Covid-19 are sensational and not terribly informative, since they are anecdotal. For the same reason it is also not terribly informative when "breakthrough" infections are given great emphasis. What is informative is that FDA reviewed data indicates that the mRNA vaccines are 95% effective at preventing hospitalization/severe illness, and that they maintain close to this level of effectiveness after boosters. The vast majority of people in Covid-19 wards and dying of Covid-19 are unvaccinated. Statistics give the most accurate information, but only when presented in the correct context and when reviewed by someone who understands statistics. People who don't understand math are easily deceived by statistics taken out of context.

As far as "creeping authoritarianism" I am more worried about a political party that tries to use fraudulent claims to suppress votes for their opponents. We have had vaccine mandates for many decades, and that is why we no longer have tens of thousands of children dying of polio, smallpox and measles in the United States. Covid-19 vaccine requirements are sane public health policy, not "creeping authoritarianism."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 05, 2022, 02:21:01 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 05, 2022, 08:15:58 AM
Please pass along our well wishes...."from the 'cat group".   :)

PD

p.s.  I must admit that sleeping in front of a fire does sound quite restorative; it's worked for many a cat.
Will do - thank you and to John (MI) and other well-wishers.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 05, 2022, 02:32:58 PM
Well, I was sorry to learn that a flute instructor from school days in my home town has died from respiratory failure severely aggravated by COVID. What's worse is, having learnt that she was an anti-vaxxer, and that her death was therefore thoroughly preventable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 05, 2022, 04:59:44 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 02:15:31 PM
Numerous other media reports say that the prosecutor's husband revealed that she was unvaccinated at the time of her death.
Then that leads to the question of who reported first.
If CBS News was first, then the point remains, they are just reporting to disgracefully shame someone opposing mandates.

If they reported because other news reported first, then the point of other news outlets could creating that story could be multiple possibilities. And it would be kinda pathetic on CBS News' part that they copy a story, yet don't even read it enough to get the details that she wasn't vaccinated and instead act as if they don't know.

Or they were unaware of it being reported already, then that would lead to my original point.

But also- yeah, unvaccinated would lead to a higher chance of dying, so I wouldn't doubt it.

edit: should add that her not being vaccinated doesn't necessarily mean anti-vaxx- maybe in other articles it may clarify, but in the video it's not clear if she is against other people taking the vaccine- but if her position was something like banning vaccines for everyone, then I'd strongly disagree and say she should be open to plenty of opposition to that opinion.


Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 02:15:31 PM
We have had vaccine mandates for many decades, and that is why we no longer have tens of thousands of children dying of polio, smallpox and measles in the United States. Covid-19 vaccine requirements are sane public health policy, not "creeping authoritarianism."
This point I've already seen in this thread, and it's not a good comparison, also it doesn't address the issue of personal autonomy ("my body my choice" position) at all.




Worldwide:
Quote
How many children have died from COVID-19?
Among the 3.4 million COVID-19 deaths1 reported in the MPIDR COVerAGE database, 0.4 per cent (over 12,000) occur in children and adolescents under 20 years of age. Of the over 12,000 deaths reported in those under 20 years of age, 58 per cent occurred among adolescents ages 10–19, and 42 per cent among children ages 0–9.

Data correct as of December 2021. For more information, including age and sex disaggregated data, visit our interactive dashboard.

1based off 65 per cent of the total global deaths reported by JHU.





US:
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Deaths-Focus-on-Ages-0-18-Yea/nr4s-juj3

Less than 1,000 kids in the US have died from Covid.




Is it really worth forcing 300 million people to get a shot, when we still don't know long term effects?
And if children are the concern, then you can mandate that they get shots, but why all of us, too? Why don't we get a choice?
Nothing wrong with choosing to get one for yourself or your kid, it may save your life. But the mentality of people who are okay being forced to get it, and being okay with others being forced to get it, is wrong. It completely disrespects personal choice and autonomy over their own body.
You don't have to agree, but this is what point that anti-mandate people are making, but it tends to get misrepresented by the media.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 08:12:54 PM
Quote from: greg on January 05, 2022, 04:59:44 PMIs it really worth forcing 300 million people to get a shot, when we still don't know long term effects?
And if children are the concern, then you can mandate that they get shots, but why all of us, too? Why don't we get a choice?
Nothing wrong with choosing to get one for yourself or your kid, it may save your life. But the mentality of people who are okay being forced to get it, and being okay with others being forced to get it, is wrong. It completely disrespects personal choice and autonomy over their own body.
You don't have to agree, but this is what point that anti-mandate people are making, but it tends to get misrepresented by the media.

I never said children were the only or primary consideration for the Covid-19 vaccine. The fear of "long-term effects" is an unhinged conspiracy theory. I do not know of any case where a vaccine was reliably established to have long-term side effects. Side effects generally take the form of an allergic reaction, anaphylaxis being the worst case scenario, or an autoimmune reaction such as the one that seems to lead to rare instances of serious blood clots in recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Such reactions typically emerge hours or days after the vaccine is administered. After hundreds of millions of vaccine doses have been administered with an extremely small number of serious reactions the vaccine has been proved safe with great certainty. In a year and a half, more than 800,000 Americans suffered the long-term side effect of SARS-CoV-2, being dead. Many more seem to have suffered long-term, perhaps permanent organ damage.

And, as far as I know, no one is seriously advocating that people be literally forced to receive the vaccine. The most extreme position being taken is that people who refuse the vaccine be denied certain privileges, such as using public transportation or other public facilities, or being employed in certain jobs. Children not vaccinated against measles, small pox and other serious diseases forfeit the right to attend public schools. The only difference here is that a similar standard is being applied to adults.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 05, 2022, 11:23:28 PM
Quote from: greg on January 05, 2022, 04:59:44 PM
This point I've already seen in this thread, and it's not a good comparison, also it doesn't address the issue of personal autonomy ("my body my choice" position) at all.

"My body my choice" is an idiotic argument that pretends the consequences of your infection magically stop at the boundaries of your body.

I mean, that's not how infectious diseases work. By definition. They're diseases that are passed from one person to another. One person's refusal to reduce the risk of transmission has a direct effect on the risks of everyone they come into contact with.

It's the same argument as passive smoking. We brought in rules around smoking precisely because we understood that the effects of smoking are not automatically confined to the person who's lighting the cigarettes - a point that is far less obvious than the fact that infectious diseases are passed from one person to another.

"My body my choice" might work fine for medical conditions that you can't pass on. It's stupid for ones that you can, and indeed where the only mechanism for catching them is... catching them.

If there's one thing that's been really wrong about the whole approach to this issue, it's the fact that people haven't been taught enough about vaccination science to STOP believing that it's all about them as an individual. That's not actually the scientific rationale for vaccination campaigns.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 05, 2022, 11:44:26 PM
ADDENDUM: Plus, of course, there's the minor detail that most "my body my choice" people still want medical treatment to rescue them if they get infected. So their "personal" choice also leads to increased strains on the health care system.

Maybe I'd be more sympathetic to "my body my choice" if the choice came with a promise to personally fund a hospital bed and medical team. Though just one hospital bed for personal use probably isn't enough, as per my previous post they should also cover anyone they pass the infection onto.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 01:29:23 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 05, 2022, 08:12:54 PM
The most extreme position being taken is that people who refuse the vaccine be denied certain privileges, such as using public transportation or other public facilities, or being employed in certain jobs.

Since when is using public transportation or other public facilities a privilege?  ???

And what do you make of this recent idiocy from Mr. Macron: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/05/europe/macron-unvaccinated-comments-vaccine-pass-intl/index.html (https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/05/europe/macron-unvaccinated-comments-vaccine-pass-intl/index.html)  A President officially declaring that he splits his fellow countrymen in two parts, one of which he explicitly despises and aims to turn into second-class citizens or even no citizens at all?  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 01:29:35 AM
In Europe we're seeing very rapid rises in cases of omicron in countries which have been enforcing mask mandates -- France, Holland, probably others. Those mask mandates don't seem to be very effective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 06, 2022, 01:38:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 01:29:35 AM
In Europe we're seeing very rapid rises in cases of omicron in countries which have been enforcing mask mandates -- France, Holland, probably others. Those mask mandates don't seem to be very effective.

The extreme contagiousness of the omikron seems to have come as a surprise to everybody - experts included, and to prevent this from spreading is more a question of peoples behavior than about restrictions and mandates.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 02:33:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 01:29:35 AM
In Europe we're seeing very rapid rises in cases of omicron in countries which have been enforcing mask mandates -- France, Holland, probably others. Those mask mandates don't seem to be very effective.

On their own, possibly not. Though it's also a question of timing - when those mandates were in place, as opposed to when omicron took hold - and degree of actual enforcement and compliance (which almost inevitably drops off over time, people are tired of doing these things).

Another flaw is when people have been given the impression that vaccination would solve everything, when the real situation was that vaccination was one strategy along with others such as masks and distancing. People don't want to keep having to live their lives in a different way with masks and isolation, and so it wasn't hard to sell the idea that vaccination would mean not having to do that.

But we're not at the stage of things going back to "normal", if we ever will be. I've seen one epidemiologist suggesting that we might move from a pandemic disease to an endemic disease in another 12 months or so. And one of the biggest issues is that we haven't got people vaccinated. The appearance of new variants was widely predicted because the vaccination rates in some parts of the world was so low. Vaccinating the whole of Western Europe is going to be of limited effectiveness unless you also prevent travel in and out of Western Europe.

Covid-19 is now far more infectious than when it first appeared 2 years ago. So maybe masks aren't that effective. Although you might also find that the situation would be even worse without masks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 06, 2022, 02:49:27 AM
There are many surveys showing at least some effect of masks, and under various circumstances. One can't really base an argument against this with one's feelings, or without some knowledge about those surveys.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:56:12 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 02:33:24 AM
people have been given the impression that vaccination would solve everything

Actually, this is not what people have been given the impression. This is what they have been explicitly told in plain English / Romanian / French / German whatever when the first vaccines were launched.  "Get vaccinated, it's the only way to return to normal life." People have been lied to, big time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:07:22 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:56:12 AM
Actually, this is not what people have been given the impression. This is what they have been explicitly told in plain English / Romanian / French / German whatever when the first vaccines were launched.  "Get vaccinated, it's the only way to return to normal life." People have been lied to, big time.

Yes. I'm quite certain that politicians have said such things. And probably made scientists wince in the process.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 03:17:34 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 06, 2022, 01:38:08 AM
The extreme contagiousness of the omikron seems to have come as a surprise to everybody - experts included, and to prevent this from spreading is more a question of peoples behavior than about restrictions and mandates.

Indeed and I'm pleased to say that in London -- which was leading the omicron vanguard in the UK -- new cases have been coming down despite the New Year celebrations. No mask mandates or anything like that, just a bit of personal responsibility. 

It's anyone's guess what will happen when schools go back of course, or indeed as more older people get omicron.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 03:19:30 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:07:22 AM
Yes. I'm quite certain that politicians have said such things. And probably made scientists wince in the process.

Some scientists, not all. At least in Romania's case, back then almost all scientists and doctors either sitting in the Covid committee or appearing on TV sang the same aria: "Get vaccinated, it's the only way to return to normal life." The very few who were skeptic about that were either ignored or derided as conspiracy theorists. Today the latter are fully vindicated by reality. It's quite probable, though, that this is a scenario which many other countries have seen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 03:27:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:56:12 AM
Actually, this is not what people have been given the impression. This is what they have been explicitly told in plain English / Romanian / French / German whatever when the first vaccines were launched.  "Get vaccinated, it's the only way to return to normal life." People have been lied to, big time.

The really interesting question for me is what happens when the population lose confidence in the politicians, because they feel they have been misled, or (in the case of the Government here in the UK), because their members have broken the very rules which they have imposed on the people.

My feeling is that it may make people much less cooperative, much more reluctant to comply with imposed rules. I think the situation is saveable, by lots of discussion and two way communication and much greater openness. But time may be running out, and it may be hard in those countries where the state/population relationship is not very open, not very trusting.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 03:32:52 AM
There's an interesting discussion of this here from a Danish political scientist, Michael Bang Petersen -- it starts with some observations about cooperation with the mask mandate has reduced in Denmark, and then starts to propose some hypotheses about why

https://twitter.com/m_b_petersen/status/1477409916214255619?s=21

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:36:39 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 03:19:30 AM
Some scientists, not all. At least in Romania's case, back then almost all scientists and doctors either sitting in the Covid committee or appearing on TV sang the same aria: "Get vaccinated, it's the only way to return to normal life." The very few who were skeptic about that were either ignored or derided as conspiracy theorists. Today the latter are fully vindicated by reality. It's quite probable, though, that this is a scenario which many other countries have seen.

I'm obviously not going to go through the transcripts of a Romanian committee to argue with you about this and to examine exactly what people said, but I'm not for a second suggesting it's appropriate to be skeptical about vaccination in general. Vaccinated is better than not vaccinated. Even now with omicron, vaccination is significantly improving the course of an infection when it hasn't actually prevented an infection.

Half the issue is people not having a clear idea of exactly what "normal life" means and not having a clear idea about what vaccination was supposed to achieve. I've certainly seen plenty of statements by health professionals, over quite a lengthy period, saying that the goal of vaccination was not to prevent infections, but to reduce deaths. Which seems to be working. But vaccination on its own could never determine whether "life" would be "normal", because there's a huge mass of social and political questions in there as well as medical ones. We have to decide what level of illness we're prepared to accept. "Normal life" includes influenza killing people, and if we get to the point where the rate at which covid-19 kills people is about the same as the rate at which influenza kills people... are we going to be okay with that? That's a policy/social decision, not a medical one.

We don't constantly report numbers of flu infections. We're used to it. We do report in some years that the cases are up, and the deaths are up. An increase is news. But we have a background level of flu, and flu deaths - with flu vaccination available - that we don't consider terribly newsworthy.

People who kept saying from the start that covid was no different to flu were wrong. But I've seen health professionals suggesting for a long time that the ultimate goal is to make it that we live with covid-19 much as we live with the flu. In which case, "normal life" is going to involve people getting infected and sick. Just not as many people dying as has been the case.

EDIT: Events like this do change what people consider 'normal' anyway, and later generations tend to forget what caused the change. One of the podcasts I listen to recently had the rather startling story of how the invention of the bicycle is directly connected to the "year without a summer" in 1816. People riding bicycles nowadays are mostly completely unaware that they were invented because of a lack of horses, after people were forced to kill and eat their horses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 03:48:10 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:36:39 AM
I'm obviously not going to go through the transcripts of a Romanian committee to argue with you about this and to examine exactly what people said, but I'm not for a second suggesting it's appropriate to be skeptical about vaccination in general. Vaccinated is better than not vaccinated. Even now with omicron, vaccination is significantly improving the course of an infection when it hasn't actually prevented an infection.

I was perhaps unclear. The scientists I mentioned were / are skeptical not about vaccination in general. They were / are skeptical about the idea that vaccination alone can solve the problem --- exactly the idea that has been aggressively promoted in the early phases of vaccination, and to which some people still cling to. An idea which, as you correctly pointed out, is entirely false.

QuoteHalf the issue is people not having a clear idea of exactly what "normal life" means and not having a clear idea about what vaccination was supposed to achieve. I've certainly seen plenty of statements by health professionals, over quite a lengthy period, saying that the goal of vaccination was not to prevent infections, but to reduce deaths. Which seems to be working. But vaccination on its own could never determine whether "life" would be "normal", because there's a huge mass of social and political questions in there as well as medical ones. We have to decide what level of illness we're prepared to accept. "Normal life" includes influenza killing people, and if we get to the point where the rate at which covid-19 kills people is about the same as the rate at which influenza kills people... are we going to be okay with that? That's a policy/social decision, not a medical one.

We don't constantly report numbers of flu infections. We're used to it. We do report in some years that the cases are up, and the deaths are up. An increase is news. But we have a background level of flu, and flu deaths - with flu vaccination available - that we don't consider terribly newsworthy.

People who kept saying from the start that covid was no different to flu were wrong. But I've seen health professionals suggesting for a long time that the ultimate goal is to make it that we live with covid-19 much as we live with the flu. In which case, "normal life" is going to involve people getting infected and sick. Just not as many people dying as has been the case.

Eminently sensible points, both from you and from the health professionals you mention.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 03:57:25 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 03:27:33 AM
The really interesting question for me is what happens when the population lose confidence in the politicians, because they feel they have been misled, or (in the case of the Government here in the UK), because their members have broken the very rules which they have imposed on the people.

My feeling is that it may make people much less cooperative, much more reluctant to comply with imposed rules. I think the situation is saveable, by lots of discussion and two way communication and much greater openness. But time may be running out, and it may be hard in those countries where the state/population relationship is not very open, not very trusting.

Such as Romania, where we have centuries-old extensive experience with untrustworthy, greedy, arrogant, egotistic, mendacious governments.

Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 03:32:52 AM
There's an interesting discussion of this here from a Danish political scientist, Michael Bang Petersen -- it starts with some observations about cooperation with the mask mandate has reduced in Denmark, and then starts to propose some hypotheses about why

https://twitter.com/m_b_petersen/status/1477409916214255619?s=21

Interesting indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 05:36:16 AM
With the omicron surge (Massachusetts has now reached the grim milestone of 20K COVID deaths, and omicron accounts for 95% of our cases) we have decided to pause our church choir for a few weeks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 05:39:29 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 03:48:10 AM
I was perhaps unclear. The scientists I mentioned were / are skeptical not about vaccination in general. They were / are skeptical about the idea that vaccination alone can solve the problem --- exactly the idea that has been aggressively promoted in the early phases of vaccination, and to which some people still cling to.

To my knowledge, no health official in the US has said this, of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 05:53:19 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 05:39:29 AM
To my knowledge, no health official in the US has said this, of course.

December 16, 2020:

"So if we can get the overwhelming proportion of the population vaccinated by let's say the end of the second, the beginning of the third quarter – by the time we get into mid-fall of 2021, we can be approaching some level of normality," Fauci told CNBC's Meg Tirrell during a special edition of the "Healthy Returns" conference.

To get back to normal, however, Fauci said between 75% and 85% of the population will need to to get inoculated against Covid-19. That would create an "umbrella" of immunity to prevent further spread of the virus, Fauci said.

"That would be able to protect even the vulnerables who have not been vaccinated, or those in which the vaccine has not been effective," Fauci said.


Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html) (emphasis mine)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 05:58:19 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 05:53:19 AM
December 16, 2020:

"So if we can get the overwhelming proportion of the population vaccinated by let's say the end of the second, the beginning of the third quarter – by the time we get into mid-fall of 2021, we can be approaching some level of normality," Fauci told CNBC's Meg Tirrell during a special edition of the "Healthy Returns" conference.

To get back to normal, however, Fauci said between 75% and 85% of the population will need to to get inoculated against Covid-19. That would create an "umbrella" of immunity to prevent further spread of the virus, Fauci said.

"That would be able to protect even the vulnerables who have not been vaccinated, or those in which the vaccine has not been effective," Fauci said.


Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html) (emphasis mine)


Specifically, you said "vaccination alone." Andrei. Every health official in the US has said that vaccination is a key element of returning life to normal. If you're bucking against that, you're bucking against good sense and reality. For only one thing, the widespread emotional vaccine-denial has interfered with the return to normal life, and does not "prove" that vaccination is not efficacious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 06:08:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 05:58:19 AM
Specifically, you said "vaccination alone." Andrei.

Precisely, Karl. Nowhere in that article is Fauci cited as saying you will still have to wear masks, keep the social distancing, work or school online etc even at a high vaccination level. All he said is that by reaching between 75% and 85 vaccination level you will get back to normal because even the unvaccinated or those in which the vaccine has not* been effective will be protected.

* notice the singular: he did not mention any boosters.

Looks like a clear case of "Get vaccinated so that we can all get back to normal" to me.

And I think that the vast majority of people in any given country would agree that "normal" means no more lockdowns, restrictions, mask mandates, online work and schooling etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 06:26:10 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 06:08:45 AM
Precisely, Karl. Nowhere in that article is Fauci cited as saying you will still have to wear masks, keep the social distancing, work or school online etc even at a high vaccination level. All he said is that by reaching between 75% and 85 vaccination level you will get back to normal because even the unvaccinated or those in which the vaccine has not* been effective will be protected.

* notice the singular: he did not mention any boosters.

Looks like a clear case of "Get vaccinated so that we can all get back to normal" to me.

To me, it looks like a clear case of Andrei tendentiously misreading and misrepresenting. You appear here not like a person seeking the facts and the truth, but like a champion of misinformation.

Since your pointlessly argumentative, emotional assertion is that Fauci's claim that by reaching between 75% and 85 vaccination level you will get back to normal is somehow "a lie, big time," let me guess, you're also asserting that this vaccination level has been reached?

Anyone with intelligence who has lived through the pandemic, yourself included, knows that the situation is continually evolving. So your "gotcha" about Fauci not mentioning boosters in 2016 does not merit the effort of rebuttal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 08:55:57 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 06:26:10 AM
To me, it looks like a clear case of Andrei tendentiously misreading and misrepresenting. You appear here not like a person seeking the facts and the truth, but like a champion of misinformation.

Since your pointlessly argumentative, emotional assertion is that Fauci's claim that by reaching between 75% and 85 vaccination level you will get back to normal is somehow "a lie, big time," let me guess, you're also asserting that this vaccination level has been reached?

Anyone with intelligence who has lived through the pandemic, yourself included, knows that the situation is continually evolving. So your "gotcha" about Fauci not mentioning boosters in 2016 does not merit the effort of rebuttal.

To some extent you're right, and to some extent you're missing the point. If Fauci or whoever were writing a report or a paper for McKinsey, then of course you would be right. But he's not - he's speaking to the general public via the media, supported by experts in communications - people who can make informed professional judgements about how it will be reported and received and understood. Andrei may well be right to think that many people, most even, thought that the deal was « vaccinate to get back to normal. » - i.e. vaccination is a sufficient condition - even though he didn't strictly and literally say that. And it may also be right to think that was planned for, the desired outcome, in order to nudge more people to offer their arms to the needle. Some would say that this is, while not a lie, deliberately misleading - and I would say that it was calculated paternalistic disingenuousness, justified in the Government's thinking by the immediate results of increased vaccination take up.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:13:43 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 08:55:57 AM
To some extent you're right, and to some extent you're missing the point. If Fauci or whoever were writing a report or a paper for McKinsey, then of course you would be right. But he's not - he's speaking to the general public via the media, supported by experts in communications - people who can make informed professional judgements about how it will be reported and received and understood. Andrei may well be right to think that many people, most even, thought that the deal was « vaccinate to get back to normal. » - i.e. vaccination is a sufficient condition - even though he didn't strictly and literally say that. And it may also be right to think that was planned for, the desired outcome, in order to nudge more people to offer their arms to the needle. Some would say that this is, while not a lie, deliberately misleading - and I would say that that it was  calculated paternalistic disingenuousness, justified in the Government's thinking by the immediate results of increased vaccination take up.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:19:28 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 06:26:10 AM
To me, it looks like a clear case of Andrei tendentiously misreading and misrepresenting. You appear here not like a person seeking the facts and the truth, but like a champion of misinformation.

Karl, please, either you cease calling me names or I'll cease replying to your posts.

QuoteSince your pointlessly argumentative, emotional assertion is that Fauci's claim that by reaching between 75% and 85 vaccination level you will get back to normal is somehow "a lie, big time," let me guess, you're also asserting that this vaccination level has been reached?

I don't know about the USA but in some European countries yes, that level has been reached  --- and guess what, they still have restrictions and mask mandates and some of them even lockdowns.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:39:28 AM
On the humorous side: has anyone else noticed how close Que's avatar (Louis XV if I'm not mistaken) resembles a coronavirus?  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 06, 2022, 09:42:54 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:39:28 AM
On the humorous side: has anyone else noticed how close Que's avatar (Louis XV if I'm not mistaken) resembles a coronavirus?  :D

It isn't called "corona" virus for nothing...  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:44:37 AM
Quote from: Que on January 06, 2022, 09:42:54 AM
It isn't called "corona" virus for nothing...  ;)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 11:04:38 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 05:53:19 AM
December 16, 2020:

"So if we can get the overwhelming proportion of the population vaccinated by let's say the end of the second, the beginning of the third quarter – by the time we get into mid-fall of 2021, we can be approaching some level of normality," Fauci told CNBC's Meg Tirrell during a special edition of the "Healthy Returns" conference.

To get back to normal, however, Fauci said between 75% and 85% of the population will need to to get inoculated against Covid-19. That would create an "umbrella" of immunity to prevent further spread of the virus, Fauci said.

"That would be able to protect even the vulnerables who have not been vaccinated, or those in which the vaccine has not been effective," Fauci said.


Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/dr-fauci-says-us-could-return-to-normal-by-mid-fall-if-most-people-get-covid-vaccine.html) (emphasis mine)

Part of what you have in bold is not a Fauci quote. It is text written by a journalist.

The other part that you have in bold refers to a level of vaccination that I believe the USA has never reached, and makes no reference to normality or to vaccination being the total answer.

But the first point is the more important one: you are taking a news report, written by a journalist, which has bits and pieces of sentences from Fauci, and treating it as "this is what Fauci said". It isn't. It's how a journalist interpreted and boiled down what Fauci said. And from both extensive knowledge of the problems in the ways science is reported and some experience of getting to hear Fauci in his own words, I would be EXTREMELY cautious about treating those as the same thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 06, 2022, 11:20:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 05, 2022, 07:33:53 AM
Thanks for asking PD.
Not too bad I think. No more coughing, but she feels tired/exhausted a lot of the time. She's currently asleep in front of the fire in the living room, which is why I'm left to contact my 'cat group' in peace.  :)
All strength to those of you struggling with this.

Much strength to her, and to you also.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 06, 2022, 11:24:53 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 05, 2022, 09:33:15 AM
Some say the virus can give a postive test up to 12 weeks afterwards. I haven't investigated further on that, though.

A positive PCR test, yes, I have heard the same thing. It is why a negative PCR test is not required (at least here, in the US) to break quarantine once one has recovered from COVID, and why it is generally recommended not to test again (once again, by PCR) for 90 (or some similar number) days afterward.

This doesn't apply to antigen tests.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 06, 2022, 11:25:50 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:36:39 AM

EDIT: Events like this do change what people consider 'normal' anyway, and later generations tend to forget what caused the change. One of the podcasts I listen to recently had the rather startling story of how the invention of the bicycle is directly connected to the "year without a summer" in 1816. People riding bicycles nowadays are mostly completely unaware that they were invented because of a lack of horses, after people were forced to kill and eat their horses.

Which podcast is that?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 11:30:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 09:19:28 AM
I don't know about the USA but in some European countries yes, that level has been reached  --- and guess what, they still have restrictions and mask mandates and some of them even lockdowns.

Guess what, Andrei, while any epidemiologist knew that the virus would mutate, I suppose Fauci's "critical error" here was, that he failed in 2016 to anticipate (specifically) the exponential rise in transmissibility of the omicron virus in 2022. Not even our expert GMG virologists foresaw that. Why you and Mandryka are so invested in trying to paint Fauci as someone acting in bad faith, is your trip. It ain't The Quest for the Facts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 12:06:38 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 06, 2022, 11:25:50 AM
Which podcast is that?

It was an episode of 99% Invisible. Great show.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 06, 2022, 12:16:32 PM
Thanks. I'll check it out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 12:56:02 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 11:30:57 AM
Guess what, Andrei, while any epidemiologist knew that the virus would mutate, I suppose Fauci's "critical error" here was, that he failed in 2016 to anticipate (specifically) the exponential rise in transmissibility of the omicron virus in 2022. Not even our expert GMG virologists foresaw that. Why you and Mandryka are so invested in trying to paint Fauci as someone acting in bad faith, is your trip. It ain't The Quest for the Facts.

Salesmanship. Talking up the positive to get people to focus there rather than on all the ifs and buts. It's only natural. And any good salesman always makes sure that he can't be accused telling lies or omitting to mention important facts when buyers' remorse sets in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 06, 2022, 01:09:47 PM
Quote from: krummholz on January 06, 2022, 11:20:04 AM
Much strength to her, and to you also.
Very many thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:16:12 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 11:04:38 AM
Part of what you have in bold is not a Fauci quote. It is text written by a journalist.

The other part that you have in bold refers to a level of vaccination that I believe the USA has never reached, and makes no reference to normality or to vaccination being the total answer.

But the first point is the more important one: you are taking a news report, written by a journalist, which has bits and pieces of sentences from Fauci, and treating it as "this is what Fauci said". It isn't. It's how a journalist interpreted and boiled down what Fauci said. And from both extensive knowledge of the problems in the ways science is reported and some experience of getting to hear Fauci in his own words, I would be EXTREMELY cautious about treating those as the same thing.

Well, yes, absolutely. Unless one is privy to Fauci's press briefings, scientific meetings or reports and private family statements, the only way one can know what he thinks about Covid is by mass media filters.

But this is all the more reason for him or any other scientist who goes public to be extremely  careful  and cautious about what they say and how they express it --- and to explicitly and vehemently protest when the said media misquote them and misrepresent their position.

If that is Fauci's case, I'll leave to others to judge.

Anyway I thank you for contradicting my position without presupposing and proclaiming that I am a bad faith person. Much appreciated.






Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:26:10 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng  ;Dlink=topic=29665.msg1416523#msg1416523 date=16414827707
Fauci not mentioning boosters in 2016

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 11:30:57 AM
Fauci's "critical error" here was, that he failed in 2016

2016 twice?

Non c'e due senza tre.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:44:26 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 06, 2022, 12:56:02 PM
Salesmanship. Talking up the positive to get people to focus there rather than on all the ifs and buts. It's only natural. And any good salesman always makes sure that he can't be accused telling lies or omitting to mention important facts when buyers' remorse sets in.

;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:48:52 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 06, 2022, 11:30:57 AM
Not even our expert GMG virologists foresaw that.

Now you sound exactly like Todd, word for word. ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 03:21:56 PM
Quote from: Florestan on January 06, 2022, 02:16:12 PM
But this is all the more reason for him or any other scientist who goes public to be extremely  careful  and cautious about what they say and how they express it --- and to explicitly and vehemently protest when the said media misquote them and misrepresent their position.

It's an interesting question just who you get to protest to... given that much of the worst misrepresentation of Fauci was coming from the President of the USA for a period, he had to choose his battles...  :laugh:

But I think the wider, more general problem is that a lot of scientists are not really choosing to "go public" in that way, and it's not their natural inclination. They kind of end up being public when they get into a senior enough position, and/or when their area of knowledge becomes of public interest. I actually first came across Fauci thanks to a podcast (Science Vs) that had an episode about pandemics before Covid-19 appeared. I think it might have been earlier in 2019. And they had him back on once Covid-19 was here... there was a sense from the hosts and Fauci that they'd never expected him to become a household name in the interim.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 06, 2022, 03:54:51 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 05, 2022, 11:23:28 PM
"My body my choice" is an idiotic argument that pretends the consequences of your infection magically stop at the boundaries of your body.
Why are we still using this argument? We all know you can pass it on to others if you get vaccinated. In fact, it seems likelier that you will, because symptoms might be mild enough for you that you don't know you're sick, so you won't be quarantined and unknowingly spread it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 05:47:14 PM
Quote from: greg on January 06, 2022, 03:54:51 PM
Why are we still using this argument? We all know you can pass it on to others if you get vaccinated. In fact, it seems likelier that you will, because symptoms might be mild enough for you that you don't know you're sick, so you won't be quarantined and unknowingly spread it.

Seems likelier?

Um, no. Thanks for your little bit of amateur reasoning, but the actual science on this shows that vaccinated people who get infected shed less virus and consequently infect fewer people. This stuff is actually studied you know. We don't have to rely on a hypothesis that greg figured out, we can actually go check. We can actually explode the assumption that you made that all infections are equally infectious. For example:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/12/vaccinated-who-get-breakthrough-infections-less-contagious/

We're still using this argument because it's true. The fact that you don't LIKE it is neither here nor there. The fact that you don't understand the difference between vaccination being an absolute guarantee and vaccination being about risk reduction for both you and those around you, hopefully we can work on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 06, 2022, 07:08:14 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 05:47:14 PM
Seems likelier?

Um, no. Thanks for your little bit of amateur reasoning, but the actual science on this shows that vaccinated people who get infected shed less virus and consequently infect fewer people. This stuff is actually studied you know. We don't have to rely on a hypothesis that greg figured out, we can actually go check. We can actually explode the assumption that you made that all infections are equally infectious. For example:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/12/vaccinated-who-get-breakthrough-infections-less-contagious/

We're still using this argument because it's true. The fact that you don't LIKE it is neither here nor there. The fact that you don't understand the difference between vaccination being an absolute guarantee and vaccination being about risk reduction for both you and those around you, hopefully we can work on.

Thank you for pointing that out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 06, 2022, 07:10:44 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 05:47:14 PM
Seems likelier?

Um, no. Thanks for your little bit of amateur reasoning, but the actual science on this shows that vaccinated people who get infected shed less virus and consequently infect fewer people. This stuff is actually studied you know. We don't have to rely on a hypothesis that greg figured out, we can actually go check. We can actually explode the assumption that you made that all infections are equally infectious. For example:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/12/vaccinated-who-get-breakthrough-infections-less-contagious/

We're still using this argument because it's true. The fact that you don't LIKE it is neither here nor there. The fact that you don't understand the difference between vaccination being an absolute guarantee and vaccination being about risk reduction for both you and those around you, hopefully we can work on.

Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 06, 2022, 07:08:14 PM
Thank you for pointing that out.

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 06, 2022, 08:05:43 PM
Got my booster today. Sore arm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 06, 2022, 11:24:03 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 05:47:14 PM
Seems likelier?

Um, no. Thanks for your little bit of amateur reasoning, but the actual science on this shows that vaccinated people who get infected shed less virus and consequently infect fewer people. This stuff is actually studied you know. We don't have to rely on a hypothesis that greg figured out, we can actually go check. We can actually explode the assumption that you made that all infections are equally infectious. For example:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/12/vaccinated-who-get-breakthrough-infections-less-contagious/

We're still using this argument because it's true. The fact that you don't LIKE it is neither here nor there. The fact that you don't understand the difference between vaccination being an absolute guarantee and vaccination being about risk reduction for both you and those around you, hopefully we can work on.

Bolded are the salient points and you are right in that many people don't understand it. Whether this is because the media haven't tried to explain it to the public or many of the public don't want to understand is a moot point. Bottom line for me. I'm now triple vaxxed and I understand that this will not necessarily prevent me from contracting Covid. I also understand that the data strongly suggests that if I do get Covid the effect will probably be mild or even less and that I will be less likely to transmit it to others.

The issue is that so many seem to want 'absolutes' and as you've pointed out, vaccination will not guarantee that. According to Benjamin Franklin (and I've taken a bit of liberty with his quote) there are only two absolutes in life - death and taxes
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on January 07, 2022, 12:22:36 AM
Got the booster recently, no side effects at all. There probably will be a third and fourth booster vaccination. According to New Zealand scientists the virus will die out after Omikron, Lets see if that happens.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 12:36:36 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 06, 2022, 11:24:03 PM
Bolded are the salient points and you are right in that many people don't understand it. Whether this is because the media haven't tried to explain it to the public or many of the public don't want to understand is a moot point. Bottom line for me. I'm now triple vaxxed and I understand that this will not necessarily prevent me from contracting Covid. I also understand that the data strongly suggests that if I do get Covid the effect will probably be mild or even less and that I will be less likely to transmit it to others.

The issue is that so many seem to want 'absolutes' and as you've pointed out, vaccination will not guarantee that. According to Benjamin Franklin (and I've taken a bit of liberty with his quote) there are only two absolutes in life - death and taxes

Quite. In other news, people in cars wearing seatbelts and people on bicycles/motorcycles wearing helmets still die in accidents sometimes. But a lot less frequently than people without seatbelts or helmets.

In the case of seatbelts, around 50 years ago there were people who argued endlessly about why they shouldn't have to wear them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 07, 2022, 12:49:12 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 06, 2022, 08:05:43 PM
Got my booster today. Sore arm.

Same here, got the shot yesterday. I'm anticipating some more side effects, like after the 2nd shot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on January 07, 2022, 12:53:16 AM
Quote from: Que on January 07, 2022, 12:49:12 AM
Same here, got the shot yesterday. I'm anticipating some more side effects, like after the 2nd shot.

Or not! Always be positive Que :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 07, 2022, 12:59:00 AM
Quote from: "Harry" on January 07, 2022, 12:53:16 AM
Or not! Always be positive Que :)

We'll see.... feel already kind of crappy. But I don't mind - it's a small inconvenience.
Will snuggle up on the couch with some good music & Netflix. 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on January 07, 2022, 01:01:00 AM
Except from a slightly (and shortly) sore arm I have had no side effects from any of my 3 shots. The 3rd booster was not noticeable at all, I did my normal training regime at the gym a few hours afterwards.

Good luck to you all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Harry on January 07, 2022, 01:05:17 AM
Quote from: Que on January 07, 2022, 12:59:00 AM
We'll see.... feel already kind of crappy. But I don't mind - it's a small inconvenience.
Will snuggle up on the couch with some good music & Netflix. 8)

That a good option! 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 07, 2022, 01:43:14 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 12:36:36 AM
In the case of seatbelts, around 50 years ago there were people who argued endlessly about why they shouldn't have to wear them.

My father was one of those lunatics. His main thesis was : "I don't want to be burnt until I'm dead."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:55:05 AM
Yes, well, cars catch fire a lot less often in real life than they do in the movies. Even 50 years ago I suspect, but certainly now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 07, 2022, 02:39:32 AM
I celebrate (?) my 70th birthday on the 13th. For some reason, the number 70 seems to be a cut off point for those who might be exposed to Covid. All I will say to my employers is that with the shortage of people in all forms of industry you will need every able body you can get and I will be one of those able bodies. No reaction at all from my Moderna Spikevax booster. I'm ready to go out and about with no worries about what's out there. Let's all move on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on January 07, 2022, 02:50:37 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 07, 2022, 02:39:32 AM
I celebrate (?) my 70th birthday on the 13th. For some reason, the number 70 seems to be a cut off point for those who might be exposed to Covid. All I will say to my employers is that with the shortage of people in all forms of industry you will need every able body you can get and I will be one of those able bodies. No reaction at all from my Moderna Spikevax booster. I'm ready to go out and about with no worries about what's out there. Let's all move on.
I'm 70 (close to 71) as well, retired 10 months ago. Boosted and not unreasonably worried.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 07, 2022, 03:22:19 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 07, 2022, 02:39:32 AM
I celebrate (?) my 70th birthday on the 13th. For some reason, the number 70 seems to be a cut off point for those who might be exposed to Covid. All I will say to my employers is that with the shortage of people in all forms of industry you will need every able body you can get and I will be one of those able bodies. No reaction at all from my Moderna Spikevax booster. I'm ready to go out and about with no worries about what's out there. Let's all move on.

That's the spirit! Happy birthday, may you live a long and healthy life!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 07, 2022, 03:58:12 AM
Quote from: Holden on January 07, 2022, 02:39:32 AM
I celebrate (?) my 70th birthday on the 13th. For some reason, the number 70 seems to be a cut off point for those who might be exposed to Covid. All I will say to my employers is that with the shortage of people in all forms of industry you will need every able body you can get and I will be one of those able bodies. No reaction at all from my Moderna Spikevax booster. I'm ready to go out and about with no worries about what's out there. Let's all move on.

Get Covid done!  ;) 

Anyway, it might well be that with Omicron Covid is done - as major health care problem.

But it's too early to tell for certain, isn't it?

PS In other news: a Dutch district court just granted permission to a 15 year old girl to be vaccinated against the will of her mother. Parents are divorced and have joint custody, so permission of both parents was required. The father agreed to vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 07, 2022, 11:38:28 AM
Quote from: Que on January 07, 2022, 03:58:12 AM
PS In other news: a Dutch district court just granted permission to a 15 year old girl to be vaccinated against the will of her mother. Parents are divorced and have joint custody, so permission of both parents was required. The father agreed to vaccination.

Is it a definitive ruling or the mother can appeal?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 07, 2022, 11:53:23 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 06, 2022, 05:47:14 PM
Seems likelier?

Um, no. Thanks for your little bit of amateur reasoning, but the actual science on this shows that vaccinated people who get infected shed less virus and consequently infect fewer people. This stuff is actually studied you know. We don't have to rely on a hypothesis that greg figured out, we can actually go check. We can actually explode the assumption that you made that all infections are equally infectious. For example:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/12/vaccinated-who-get-breakthrough-infections-less-contagious/

We're still using this argument because it's true. The fact that you don't LIKE it is neither here nor there. The fact that you don't understand the difference between vaccination being an absolute guarantee and vaccination being about risk reduction for both you and those around you, hopefully we can work on.
This article is only a month old, last I heard is that it is just as transmissable whether vaccinated or not. This was being argued online when that was believed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 07, 2022, 12:13:41 PM
Quote from: Florestan on January 07, 2022, 11:38:28 AM
Is it a definitive ruling or the mother can appeal?

An appeal is possible.  But the verdict has direct effect, so the girl can have here vaccination right away.
Unless the appeals court would grant an emergency injunction pending the appeal. Chances of that are nil.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:13:59 PM
Quote from: greg on January 07, 2022, 11:53:23 AM
This article is only a month old, last I heard is that it is just as transmissable whether vaccinated or not. This was being argued online when that was believed.

Last you heard...

The question is where are you listening? And who exactly is "arguing online"? Unless you're hanging out on a forum where scientists and researchers are sharing their results, then "arguing online" is no kind of evidence at all.

I would note that your next post, a truly ridiculous proposition about gun control, has been moved to the US politics thread; a process I do not thank you for.

But your ongoing commitment to acting like you know a lot about things just because you've been on the internet is also noted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 07, 2022, 01:38:49 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:13:59 PM
The question is where are you listening? And who exactly is "arguing online"? Unless you're hanging out on a forum where scientists and researchers are sharing their results, then "arguing online" is no kind of evidence at all.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm not presenting arguments online as evidence, what exactly do you think I'm saying?
I'm saying what has been argued is that it should be mandated to prevent people from spreading it, months before when this article was published. At that time it was known that vaccinated people could still spread it. I've seen several instances of people arguing in support of mandates online during that time, using that reason. If research has proven otherwise since then, then that's fine, but that point only stands recently.


Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:13:59 PM
I would note that your next post, a truly ridiculous proposition about gun control, has been moved to the US politics thread; a process I do not thank you for.
It wasn't off topic. Nice assumption. I was asking a question that was to be tied in to a point about vaccine mandates.
And it wasn't ridiculous, if you would just listen to the point I was about to make. Moving it was incredibly rude, along with the whole tone of your posts. Not appreciated at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 07, 2022, 01:44:50 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:13:59 PM
Last you heard...

The question is where are you listening? And who exactly is "arguing online"? Unless you're hanging out on a forum where scientists and researchers are sharing their results, then "arguing online" is no kind of evidence at all.

I would note that your next post, a truly ridiculous proposition about gun control, has been moved to the US politics thread; a process I do not thank you for.

But your ongoing commitment to acting like you know a lot about things just because you've been on the internet is also noted.

As they say: Sad!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM
Greg, it wasn't ME who decided your post on guns was off topic. I know it wasn't off topic. I wrote about vaccination in my reply. The moderators decided. Wrongly in my opinion.

Talk about assumptions...

Edit: and it's not clear to me now whether it's actually been deleted, which is even worse. Because then you won't read why your proposition was so ridiculous.

Second edit: In fact it has been deleted. The moderators apparently decided to respond to my complaint about their bad decision by making an even worse decision, and from what I know of the software it won't even save me from having the US politics thread coming up as one I've posted on.

Honestly, I'm thinking of deleting this profile and creating a new one, in the best GMG tradition, just to get around the way software behaves.

So let me briefly summarise (and for God's sake moderators leave it alone): most of the planet doesn't have school shootings and most of the planet doesn't need house cameras to achieve an absence of school shootings.

The real issue is why people resist vaccination in the face of centuries of evidence that vaccination works. That's why we do it. It's a practice driven by science. I'm struggling to understand what the resistance to it is driven by, apart from a short memory about the massive benefits that vaccination has brought.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 07, 2022, 02:30:54 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM
Greg, it wasn't ME who decided your post on guns was off topic. I know it wasn't off topic. I wrote about vaccination in my reply. The moderators decided. Wrongly in my opinion.
Ah ok, my bad then.

Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM
Second edit: In fact it has been deleted. The moderators apparently decided to respond to my complaint about their bad decision by making an even worse decision, and from what I know of the software it won't even save me from having the US politics thread coming up as one I've posted on.

Honestly, I'm thinking of deleting this profile and creating a new one, in the best GMG tradition, just to get around the way software behaves.
Yeah, that's an age old problem, unsubscribing to a thread would be a sweet option.




Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM
So let me briefly summarise (and for God's sake moderators leave it alone): most of the planet doesn't have school shootings and most of the planet doesn't need house cameras to achieve an absence of school shootings.

The real issue is why people resist vaccination in the face of centuries of evidence that vaccination works. That's why we do it. It's a practice driven by science. I'm struggling to understand what the resistance to it is driven by, apart from a short memory about the massive benefits that vaccination has brought.
Hmmmm I'm not entirely sure you know what I was getting at then.

Mods probably really didn't understood and thought it was off-topic. If mods are okay with it, I can finish my point. I was asking a question and was hoping to get a response, and then would tie in my point there.
It's a point of trying to make some understanding with this issue. I'm not trying to make any provocative point. Even if my question sounds weird.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 02:48:21 PM
Your question was based on a proposition (an entirely wrong one) about some extreme action being the only way to solve a problem.

You apparently find vaccine mandates extreme.

This is apparently based in part on seeing vaccination as a personal decision just about your own body. I've already said to you: that's not how infectious diseases work, and nor is personal protection the sole reason for vaccination (same as it isn't for masks). I'm not even sure it's the MAIN reason for vaccination. Certainly not from the perspective of an epidemiologist.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 07, 2022, 03:24:10 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:13:59 PM
Last you heard...

The question is where are you listening?


Youtubers. We've been down this road a few times now.

Some random amateur Youtuber/s will have said "just as transmissible whether vaccinated or not".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 03:42:24 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 07, 2022, 03:24:10 PM
Youtubers. We've been down this road a few times now.

Some random amateur Youtuber/s will have said "just as transmissible whether vaccinated or not".

I wonder whether I should look for YouTube videos about seatbelts and how people die wearing them... they are probably out there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 07, 2022, 03:55:12 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 03:42:24 PM
I wonder whether I should look for YouTube videos about seatbelts and how people die wearing them... they are probably out there.

Probably not a simple keyword search. It would appear mid-rant in these self-appointed contrarians daily opining.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 07, 2022, 04:11:19 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 07, 2022, 03:24:10 PM
Youtubers. We've been down this road a few times now.

Some random amateur Youtuber/s will have said "just as transmissible whether vaccinated or not".

And some call this "research." As in "I've done my own research."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 07, 2022, 06:50:45 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 07, 2022, 04:11:19 PM
And some call this "research." As in "I've done my own research."

There's 'research' and there's 'research'. We should at least let people know where our data/info came from.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 07:33:28 PM
I should perhaps note that the Harvard article, dated early December, wasn't the earliest article I found about vaccinated people shedding less virus, I just picked it because it was fairly readable and, well, because it was Harvard.

I can find one from early September, and more through October and November. And there was even an initial finding published in March pointing in the same direction.

This is from one page of google results. No, I didn't find out about this from google. I found out about this from a whole bunch of sources that I can't necessarily go back to and link (especially not when some of them were audio not text). I googled to find sources that I could post here. Credible sources.

So any notion that this is some super recent finding that overturns the previous "common sense" view that vaccinated people with breakthrough infections would be a higher risk to others... well it's just bunk.

We've certainly known for a long time that vaccination reduces the risk of being infected. We've always known it doesn't reduce the risk to zero. We also have strong evidence that vaccination is less effective with the omicron variant, but also that it still reduces the risk.

We've known for a long time that vaccination reduces the risk of severe disease. Again, it doesn't reduce it to zero. But it reduces it significantly (and this still seems to be holding up pretty well for the omicron variant).

And we know that vaccination reduces the risk of passing the disease on (quite possibly related to it reducing the risk of severe disease).

This stuff works. Most of the arguments against it seem to be of the form of an implied demand to reduce the risks to zero.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 07, 2022, 10:55:25 PM
Having worked in the past for Harvard as an online tutor for about five years I readily accept them as a credible source because I know how professional and thorough they are. The same would go for most of the universities, especially when work is peer reviewed. The only issue for a lot of people (and I understand this) is that quite a lot of what is published can be technically challenging and often doesn't make for good reading.

I try to use learned articles and also pure but accurate data from reliable sources which I can interpret in my own way. If my interpretation is wrong, I'm happy for someone to challenge me on it and it has happened to me on occasion on this forum. This way I learn something as well. While I am entitled to my opinion, others also have the right to challenge that opinion provided it doesn't become personal.

What I don't want to read is speculation that goes down one specific path and ignores any alternatives (which there will be). This absolutism is the stuff of sensationalist media articles. When I see the word 'might' or 'could', especially in the title of an article or news story, I know that this won't be balanced or unbiased.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 08, 2022, 04:41:34 AM
Quote from: greg on January 07, 2022, 01:38:49 PM
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm not presenting arguments online as evidence, what exactly do you think I'm saying?
I'm saying what has been argued is that it should be mandated to prevent people from spreading it, months before when this article was published. At that time it was known that vaccinated people could still spread it. I've seen several instances of people arguing in support of mandates online during that time, using that reason. If research has proven otherwise since then, then that's fine, but that point only stands recently.

There was never evidence that the vaccine doesn't prevent spread of Covid-19. The CDC collected data that showed that the vaccine inhibits transmission of Covid-19 in the spring of 2021. CDC director Walensky announced this finding and and some scientists in the CDC and elsewhere protested that her statement was too broad and went beyond what the data proved. This was ammunition for the anti-vax crowd. Then there was an outbreak in Provincetown, MA in the summer of 2021 in which most of the cases were in vaccinated people. The CDC announced that vaccinated people sick with Covid-19 were just as likely to spread the infection. The anti-vax crowd grabbed on to this and it led to a widespread false belief that the vaccine doesn't inhibit the spread of the disease (just reduces the severity of symptoms). That is wrong. Vaccinated people who are infected with Covid-19 are just as likely to spread the virus, but vaccinated people are much likely to get infected. It prevents spread of the virus by reducing the chance you are infected. So by getting vaccinated you are protecting yourself and you are protecting the community by reducing the chance you will infect someone else after becoming infected yourself.

The situation was laid out in an article that appeared in The Atlantic in September.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/the-vaccinated-arent-just-as-likely-to-spread-covid/620161/

The situation is changed due to the omicron variant, which may be so infectious that the current vaccines are not effective enough to achieve "herd immunity" even if everyone is vaccinated. The vaccines still seem to inhibit infection and spread of the virus, but not enough. It seems likely that a reformulated vaccine based on the omicron RNA sequence will result in improved performance against omicron.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 08, 2022, 06:07:52 AM
Some good news from the UK regarding the booster effect, don't know if it was already mentioned:

"Figures show that around 3 months after they received the third jab, protection against hospitalisation among those aged 65 and over remains at about 90%"

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/boosters-continue-to-provide-high-levels-of-protection-against-severe-disease-from-omicron-in-older-adults
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 08, 2022, 06:24:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 08, 2022, 06:07:52 AM
Some good news from the UK regarding the booster effect, don't know if it was already mentioned:

"Figures show that around 3 months after they received the third jab, protection against hospitalisation among those aged 65 and over remains at about 90%"

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/boosters-continue-to-provide-high-levels-of-protection-against-severe-disease-from-omicron-in-older-adults

I've seen other data showing that immunity is more stable after a booster.

(https://scontent.fhou1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/258538352_10162167997087580_2645361740513577960_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=nGGbASFSKmAAX_QALT-&tn=aAY9rMbwDjMHX7zc&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-1.fna&oh=00_AT_vuiOmGJYME7tfidM2518XkYYEdLqjIRaCvwy6sfsKFQ&oe=61DF5F1A)

Not surprising, almost all vaccines given in childhood are administered as an initial dose followed by a booster months or even years later. This is what was missing due to the "rushed" vaccine release, thorough testing to determine the optimum dose schedule. Safety of the vaccine was adequately established, but we are effectively doing a clinical trial with a billion participants to determine dose schedule.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 08, 2022, 06:49:14 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 08, 2022, 06:07:52 AM
Some good news from the UK regarding the booster effect, don't know if it was already mentioned:

"Figures show that around 3 months after they received the third jab, protection against hospitalisation among those aged 65 and over remains at about 90%"

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/boosters-continue-to-provide-high-levels-of-protection-against-severe-disease-from-omicron-in-older-adults

That's really good news which in fact I hadn't seen. I was under the impression that it was still very unclear what would happen to older cohorts as more of them became infected with omicron, and in the UK these older people have been well and truly boosted.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 08, 2022, 07:23:57 AM
The official DK omicron report from January 7th says that boosted constitute 8.4% of identified omicron cases - but boosted also constitute 51% of the DK population; another sign of a good deal of efficiency.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 08, 2022, 08:25:52 AM
.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 08, 2022, 09:09:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 08, 2022, 08:25:52 AM
.


No.

https://www.youtube.com/v/J9_1cdFhPUU&ab_channel=ActivistVideos
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 08, 2022, 09:18:53 AM
https://twitter.com/adamjkucharski/status/1479213084824715265?s=21

Interesting thread here on the change of behaviour of ordinary people in the UK since the start of the omicron wave. The reason it's interesting for me is that, apart from WFH, the change came about without legislation. It was effected by Government nudging alone. I'm not saying it was a free choice, by the way -- it was a choice caused by very well controlled media relations.

The result is that today, the UK is starting to see some encouraging data -- a very significant drop in hospital admissions in London, London is leading the wave here.

https://twitter.com/shaunlintern/status/1479852789975203843?s=21

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 08, 2022, 11:24:25 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM
The real issue is why people resist vaccination in the face of centuries of evidence that vaccination works. That's why we do it. It's a practice driven by science. I'm struggling to understand what the resistance to it is driven by, apart from a short memory about the massive benefits that vaccination has brought.

I'm struggling to understand this, too. And above all, I'm struggling to understand why people with concerns about vaccine safety believe fringe, dark web sources who can provide only anecdotes, over public health experts who have real science behind their statements. I think it takes a certain pre-existing alienation from mainstream news and distrust of doctors, any government-affiliated sources, and even a lack of understanding of how science works to fall down this rabbit hole. Or else personal knowledge of someone who has had an adverse reaction to vaccination. And yet, so few do have such knowledge, and yet so many believe people like Joseph Mercola, Pierre Kory, or even Robert Malone (who did contribute significantly to mRNA science early on) over their own family doctor.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 08, 2022, 11:45:54 AM
Quote from: krummholz on January 08, 2022, 11:24:25 AM
I'm struggling to understand this, too. And above all, I'm struggling to understand why people with concerns about vaccine safety believe fringe, dark web sources who can provide only anecdotes, over public health experts who have real science behind their statements.

Lawd, I know this is so (we see it on this very thread) but I'm jiggered if I can much understand it, either. Part of it (as I know [better] via someone close to me) is that disinformation enjoying free throughput via the pulpits of this great land of ours, inherently a very beliefy (to borrow a useful term of Ernie's) environment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 08, 2022, 02:00:41 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 01:57:25 PM

The real issue is why people resist vaccination in the face of centuries of evidence that vaccination works.

1. Young and fit, so don't feel as though COVID concerns them really.
2. Belong to a group with some history of abuse by medics -- some blacks in America maybe. So just no trust.
3. Feel that they can't afford to. Not just the unpaid time off work to get it, but what if they need a few days off because of side effects? They have to feed the kids, and they don't have sick pay.
4. My body is a temple and I only let very natural things go in it, unless I'm really ill, which I'm not. If I get COVID, I'll take a something for it, but I'll get over it in all probability, so it would be neurotic to worry.
5. It's a load of trouble. I have to travel to get it, possibly a log journey, book an appointment, wait in a line. Can't be bothered, better things to do.
6. Yes I may infect others if I catch it, but really so what? If they're so worried let them keep their distance or take a vaccine. Look after Number 1 is what they taught me in The University of Life, and indeed in school. Evey man for himself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on January 08, 2022, 02:09:04 PM
The main reason in western countries is that material reality has become so disconnected from people's everyday experience that we are no longer capable of perceiving it. As such, everyone determines what their own reality is, and consensus on facts is not possible. I would argue this is a natural outcome in any society where food comes from a supermarket, no one owns anything, most socialisation is disconnected from human body language/expressions/tone of voice, and most people work in jobs (in offices, etc.) where they do not produce anything tangible. It's also particularly prevalent in places where people live in suburbs but work in cities, further atomising not only the components of their everyday life but also individual people from one another.

There are few anti-vaccine movements outside western countries and where these do exist (as in, e.g., Papua New Guinea) it's a product of governments and social organisations that are perceived as too corrupt and dictatorial to provide anything for their people. (In other countries such as Brazil the most reliable way to get people to take the vaccine proved to be the government adopting an anti-vaccine political stance.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 08, 2022, 03:51:36 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 07, 2022, 03:24:10 PM
Youtubers. We've been down this road a few times now.

Some random amateur Youtuber/s will have said "just as transmissible whether vaccinated or not".
Wrong. Don't answer for me.
And you seem to have some picture in mind which can't be updated no matter what I say about that. No nuance at all.
This type of thinking seems prevalent here, where credentials come before everything. If someone isn't stamped with a seal of approval from some official organization, then no need to listen to them, what they say is invalid. That's not how things work. Things are far more complex than that.


The information I've heard from everywhere has been "it's transmissable whether you get vaccinated or not." That's it. It's not "from an amateur youtuber."
That's why we're still wearing masks, even vaccinated people.
If I missed the part that it's "less transmissable" then that's my mistake, I've only heard the "also transmissible" part. From everywhere, IRL, here, mainstream media, etc. So if this is common knowledge and I missed it, then entirely my bad.



Quote from: Madiel on January 07, 2022, 02:48:21 PM
Your question was based on a proposition (an entirely wrong one) about some extreme action being the only way to solve a problem.

You apparently find vaccine mandates extreme.

This is apparently based in part on seeing vaccination as a personal decision just about your own body. I've already said to you: that's not how infectious diseases work, and nor is personal protection the sole reason for vaccination (same as it isn't for masks). I'm not even sure it's the MAIN reason for vaccination. Certainly not from the perspective of an epidemiologist.
Close.
First of all, would you do it? Would you advocate for installing cameras in everyone's homes in order to prevent gun deaths? Yes or no.

If no, then it's because at some point you aren't willing to trade your freedom (to live unobserved) of your and others' safety (there will be no mass shootings).

Why, if you don't own any guns? Because it would feel super uncomfortable to be observed 24/7. You need to feel free from the watchful eye of the government sometimes, right?

It's about the theme of trading freedom for safety, and people's relative tolerances to it.

The opposite argument being made is about drunk driving or seatbelts- that people who are anti-mandates support these laws- they are giving up some freedom for safety. But it's a fair trade-off to most people. Some people may not, in that case they are quite extreme (or drink all the time).

If you want to understand why people are anti-mandate, you have to understand this spectrum. Some people are more willing, some are less. Vaccine mandates probably fall somewhere in the middle. Everyone falls slightly differently on the spectrum. Just imagine shifting a bit and you can understand anti-mandate people better.

People don't feel right being forced to do something they feel uncomfortable or uncertain about.

And on top of that, is it really worth forcing young people to get a vaccine which has only been out for a year, in order to save mostly older people from dying from it? The uncertainty is about the long term effects. How does that not feel questionable? What if a certain percentage of children develop lifelong health problems ten years from now- was it really worth it to save grandpa, who only had ten more years to live?

(having said that, I'm not so against it that I'd be in the street protesting, but I'm somewhat against it)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:34:09 PM
Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 03:51:36 PM
First of all, would you do it? Would you advocate for installing cameras in everyone's homes in order to prevent gun deaths? Yes or no.

If no, then it's because at some point you aren't willing to trade your freedom (to live unobserved) of your and others' safety (there will be no mass shootings).

No, I wouldn't do it because it's NOT NECESSARY. As I said in the post now deleted and in another one above which you seem to have ignored, I live in a country where we don't have mass shootings, without the need for installing cameras. Your claim that installing cameras is necessary in order to prevent mass shootings is bunk. Your whole argument stems from a ridiculous premise. You're apparently offended by me calling it ridiculous, but that doesn't make it any less ridiculous. Go to any other country in the world and you will find we don't have these regular mass shootings, and don't worry about our kids getting shot at school, and yet you'll also find that we don't have government cameras in our houses.

The problem is not a lack of cameras. The problem is that you're the kind of American who is unable to notice that the rest of the planet is not America and is also quite unable to conceive that the rest of the world might be able to teach you something.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27No_Way_To_Prevent_This,%27_Says_Only_Nation_Where_This_Regularly_Happens

Meanwhile, when it comes to coronavirus, the USA vaccination rate is reportedly 62.4% with wild variation between different states (the same data gives me 57.4% for Texas). Australia's vaccination rate is at 92.0% for adults (I don't know if the USA data I've found is adults or total population), and here in Canberra it's reportedly 98.5% for adults. So I would argue that yet again we have a situation where methods for dealing with a problem are available and a significant proportion of the American population just doesn't want to use them.

As for it not being younger people dying, tell that to the family of the 23-year-old local who died this week. He was vaccinated (2 shots, not a 3rd booster). He was lower risk on account of age, and did what he could to reduce the risk. He still died. All of this is about risk reduction. You're correct in one sense that it's about a spectrum of things and a cost-benefit analysis, but it's a really, really terrible argument to just point to something with a MASSIVE cost and (contrary to your assertion) no real benefit as if that's relevant to the discussion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 08, 2022, 04:43:02 PM
Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 03:51:36 PM
Wrong. Don't answer for me.


I'm repeating what you've said elsewhere as a supposed badge of your freethinking independence.

So what are these sources then? You're still not saying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:51:49 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 08, 2022, 02:00:41 PM
1. Young and fit, so don't feel as though COVID concerns them really.
2. Belong to a group with some history of abuse by medics -- some blacks in America maybe. So just no trust.
3. Feel that they can't afford to. Not just the unpaid time off work to get it, but what if they need a few days off because of side effects? They have to feed the kids, and they don't have sick pay.
4. My body is a temple and I only let very natural things go in it, unless I'm really ill, which I'm not. If I get COVID, I'll take a something for it, but I'll get over it in all probability, so it would be neurotic to worry.
5. It's a load of trouble. I have to travel to get it, possibly a log journey, book an appointment, wait in a line. Can't be bothered, better things to do.
6. Yes I may infect others if I catch it, but really so what? If they're so worried let them keep their distance or take a vaccine. Look after Number 1 is what they taught me in The University of Life, and indeed in school. Evey man for himself.

Definitely numbers 3 and 5 are frustrating barriers that laws and government policies should deal with. The lack of leave entitlements in the USA in particular is really bad, but then there are also issues for casual employees almost anywhere.  And actual availability of vaccines for those who want them is definitely something that needs to be managed.

Number 2 is highly understandable, I did hear a podcast episode at some point with a black doctor discussing the strategies that were being used to deal with this. Very much focused on making sure it was leaders of the black community urging vaccination, rather than a bunch of white people telling blacks to do it.

1 and 6 are self-centred and misunderstand part of how vaccination works (and also how life in general works). 4 would be laughable for it's lack of historical knowledge about how short "natural" life was, if there wasn't a multi-billion industry built around it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 08, 2022, 07:09:05 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on January 08, 2022, 04:43:02 PM
I'm repeating what you've said elsewhere as a supposed badge of your freethinking independence.

So what are these sources then? You're still not saying.
I just said in my next paragraph.


Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 03:51:36 PM
If I missed the part that it's "less transmissable" then that's my mistake, I've only heard the "also transmissible" part. From everywhere, IRL, here, mainstream media, etc. So if this is common knowledge and I missed it, then entirely my bad.
I don't have a single source for this information, can't point out anything specific. This is a commonly known thing, that it is still transmissible, that's why people are still wearing masks, or should be.





Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:34:09 PM
No, I wouldn't do it because it's NOT NECESSARY. As I said in the post now deleted and in another one above which you seem to have ignored, I live in a country where we don't have mass shootings, without the need for installing cameras. Your claim that installing cameras is necessary in order to prevent mass shootings is bunk. Your whole argument stems from a ridiculous premise. You're apparently offended by me calling it ridiculous, but that doesn't make it any less ridiculous. Go to any other country in the world and you will find we don't have these regular mass shootings, and don't worry about our kids getting shot at school, and yet you'll also find that we don't have government cameras in our houses.

The problem is not a lack of cameras. The problem is that you're the kind of American who is unable to notice that the rest of the planet is not America and is also quite unable to conceive that the rest of the world might be able to teach you something.
I didn't want to get into details about that, because at this point it really would start to go off-topic, but since you're saying that, now I have to, I thought this would be picked up already.

So in a country with this many guns, how do you suppose they would all be disposed of? Pass gun laws and they magically disappear? People will willingly turn in all of their guns, right?

You could start with police raiding everyone's homes, that would help to confiscate many guns. But what if some are well-hidden? And then someone knows someone that hides that gun, buys it from them, and wants to either go on a shooting spree or murder his drug dealer, or whatever.

Solution: install cameras in everyone's home to observe any gun handling activities. Make no place private. Privacy = breeding ground for criminal activity. (same for drugs, etc.)


And you know what, does it even matter if the scenario is ridiculous? It doesn't have to even be real to make the point I'm making, I could make up something like, what if everyone was mandated to chop off a finger to prevent nuclear war? The point is the idea, no need to focus on the specifics.




Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:34:09 PM
As for it not being younger people dying, tell that to the family of the 23-year-old local who died this week. He was vaccinated (2 shots, not a 3rd booster). He was lower risk on account of age, and did what he could to reduce the risk. He still died. All of this is about risk reduction.
I'm not sure what this has to do with mandates? We don't know how this person got sick, or if mandates would have prevented this or not.

Vaccinated people need to still be wearing masks around others to keep them from getting sick. Whoever got him sick should have done that.



Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:34:09 PM
but it's a really, really terrible argument to just point to something with a MASSIVE cost and (contrary to your assertion) no real benefit as if that's relevant to the discussion.
If I'm understanding correctly and that "MASSIVE cost" is referring to mandates, then my point that I gave was to show that that is a subjective feeling, it differs for everyone. If a lot of people feel uncomfortable with it, then yes, it is in a way, a massive cost, if you want to call it that, that's why so many people are upset about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 08, 2022, 07:25:06 PM
Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 07:09:05 PMI don't have a single source for this information, can't point out anything specific. This is a commonly known thing, that it is still transmissible, that's why people are still wearing masks, or should be.

It is a commonly known thing, that is not true. Vaccines (now with boosters) dramatically reduce the probability of contracting the disease, and similarly reduce the risk of transmitting the disease. (This has been known since spring 2021.) A person refusing the vaccine increases the risk to him or herself, and increases the risk to others to whom he or she might transmit the virus. It is therefore not an entirely individual decision. The vaccines don't reduce the risk to zero, and not everyone has a vaccine. That is why people are advised to wear masks under certain circumstances (an indoor, public space).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 08, 2022, 07:46:42 PM
I wouldn't fault someone unvaccinated for accidentally getting me sick and I die (though I would fault them if they were not wearing a mask and recklessly coughing on me)- despite me being vaccinated, because I don't get to tell them what they have to put in their body, period. That's their decision. Just stay away from me. I'll wear a mask for myself, do the same please.
Probably a decent summary how I feel. If it were purely selfishness, then I would feel differently.

And I believe that is the gist of the anti-mandate sentiment, if I understand correctly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 10:29:31 PM
The "massive cost" reference was to your stupid proposal to install a camera in every home. Not to vaccine mandates.

The mindset with which you read things is fascinating. Wrong, but fascinating.

I'm not going to comment further on guns beyond observing that I come from the country KNOWN for its gun buyback scheme. A scheme that American gun nuts are deeply terrified by precisely because it worked.

I believe parts of America have had similar schemes. So again, your whole "we couldn't possibly get rid of the guns so we will have to install cameras" shtick just seems to come from a refusal to engage with the planet that the rest of us are actually on. You put metal detectors in schools. You put guards in schools. The one thing people like you won't actually countenance is the thing that actually works: reducing the number of pointless deadly objects you have lying around houses.

And meanwhile people refuse vaccines. Often the same people who have pointless deadly objects lying around their house. There is something deeply wrong with a mindset that worries about the tiny risks of a life saving technology and clings to a technology that is over 20 times more likely to cause the owner harm than to be used for the purported purpose of self protection. That's what the statistics say. To the extent that statistics can be collected, given that the gun lobby actually pushed through laws to prevent the gathering of information, for God's sake.

When people are actively scared of data lest it overturn their ideas, I've got very little sympathy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 08, 2022, 11:33:20 PM
The new game in town: is it over yet and can we move on?

End mass jabs and live with Covid, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/08/end-mass-jabs-and-live-with-covid-says-ex-head-of-vaccine-taskforce) (Guardian/Observer)

In my mind , the anwer is given by Eleanor Riley, professor of immunology and infectious disease at the University of Edinburgh: "Everything depends on whether another variant comes up."

Another take away from this article: more boosters are probably pointless. If Omicron is going to stay, we need a modified vaccine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 11:36:50 PM
Quote from: Que on January 08, 2022, 11:33:20 PM
The new game in town: is it over yet and can we move on?

End mass jabs and live with Covid, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/08/end-mass-jabs-and-live-with-covid-says-ex-head-of-vaccine-taskforce) (Guardian/Observer)

In my mind , the anwer is given by Eleanor Riley, professor of immunology and infectious disease at the University of Edinburgh: "Everything depends on whether another variant comes up."

Another take away from this article: more boosters are probably pointless. If Omicron is going to stay, we need a modified vaccine.

I'm a bit curious as to how "end mass jabs" actually matches with "treat it like flu". Because around here we treat flu by... encouraging people to get vaccinated!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 09, 2022, 12:03:22 AM
Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 07:46:42 PM
I wouldn't fault someone unvaccinated for accidentally getting me sick and I die (though I would fault them if they were not wearing a mask and recklessly coughing on me)- despite me being vaccinated, because I don't get to tell them what they have to put in their body, period. That's their decision. Just stay away from me. I'll wear a mask for myself, do the same please.
Probably a decent summary how I feel. If it were purely selfishness, then I would feel differently.

And I believe that is the gist of the anti-mandate sentiment, if I understand correctly.

My impression is that the anti-vax people and the anti-mask people are a pretty big Venn diagram overlap. And are responding to the same sources of disinformation.

You don't seem to be seeing that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 12:18:03 AM
Quote from: greg on January 08, 2022, 07:46:42 PM
I wouldn't fault someone unvaccinated for accidentally getting me sick and I die (though I would fault them if they were not wearing a mask and recklessly coughing on me)

So you fault one kind of recklessness and not another.

Because that's what "recklessness" actually means. It's not about intentionally causing a result, it's about wilfully ignoring the consequences of your actions.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 09, 2022, 12:37:44 AM
Quote from: Que on January 08, 2022, 11:33:20 PM
In my mind , the anwer is given by Eleanor Riley, professor of immunology and infectious disease at the University of Edinburgh: "Everything depends on whether another variant comes up."

Another take away from this article: more boosters are probably pointless. If Omicron is going to stay, we need a modified vaccine.

Completely agree, as I wrote some time ago:

Quote from: (: premont :) on December 29, 2021, 03:49:57 AM
Possibly we shall not reach herd immunity until an omikron specific vaccine has been developed. And maybe we shall be in a similar situation next year with an omega variant, which is even more transmissible than the omikron, until also an omega specific vaccine has been developed.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2022, 01:20:48 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 04:51:49 PM
Definitely numbers 3 and 5 are frustrating barriers that laws and government policies should deal with. The lack of leave entitlements in the USA in particular is really bad, but then there are also issues for casual employees almost anywhere.  And actual availability of vaccines for those who want them is definitely something that needs to be managed.

Number 2 is highly understandable, I did hear a podcast episode at some point with a black doctor discussing the strategies that were being used to deal with this. Very much focused on making sure it was leaders of the black community urging vaccination, rather than a bunch of white people telling blacks to do it.

1 and 6 are self-centred and misunderstand part of how vaccination works (and also how life in general works). 4 would be laughable for it's lack of historical knowledge about how short "natural" life was, if there wasn't a multi-billion industry built around it.

The point I really wanted to make is that declining the vaccine may not be the best decision people can make, but it is, in some cases, totally understandable. It's not crazy, something to be dismissed out of hand.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 02:00:31 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 09, 2022, 01:20:48 AM
The point I really wanted to make is that declining the vaccine may not be the best decision people can make, but it is, in some cases, totally understandable. It's not crazy, something to be dismissed out of hand.

Yes, I get that. And I would rate at least half of the reasons that you presented as understandable to me personally.

But I would note that those reasons are not the sort of reasons that tend to lead people to go around in full anti-vaxxer mode. Indeed, a couple of them are reasons where the issue is access to the vaccine, not desire to have it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 09, 2022, 02:24:33 AM
Quote from: Que on January 08, 2022, 11:33:20 PM
End mass jabs and live with Covid, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/08/end-mass-jabs-and-live-with-covid-says-ex-head-of-vaccine-taskforce) (Guardian/Observer)

Last paragraph of the article:

child health expert, Professor Helen Bedford of University College London, warned that there was a danger in lumping diehard anti-vaxxers with people who have nagging doubts about getting a vaccine. "If you do that you will miss the chance to persuade those who have genuine concerns but who could change their minds and get vaccinated. It does not help to criticise them all as talking mumbo-jumbo."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 09, 2022, 02:45:16 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 02:00:31 AM
Yes, I get that. And I would rate at least half of the reasons that you presented as understandable to me personally.

But I would note that those reasons are not the sort of reasons that tend to lead people to go around in full anti-vaxxer mode. Indeed, a couple of them are reasons where the issue is access to the vaccine, not desire to have it.

This is true.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 09, 2022, 03:18:13 AM
My wife has finally tested negative over two consecutive days so we will go out for a walk today.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 09, 2022, 03:21:05 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 09, 2022, 03:18:13 AM
My wife has finally tested negative over two consecutive days so we will go out for a walk today.
:)

That's really great to hear - congratulations.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 09, 2022, 03:23:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 09, 2022, 02:24:33 AM
Last paragraph of the article:

child health expert, Professor Helen Bedford of University College London, warned that there was a danger in lumping diehard anti-vaxxers with people who have nagging doubts about getting a vaccine. "If you do that you will miss the chance to persuade those who have genuine concerns but who could change their minds and get vaccinated. It does not help to criticise them all as talking mumbo-jumbo."

Agreed. Branding doubters as anti-vaxxers is unfair and counter productive.
Not that is no relation between the two. It is the anti-vaxxers that are trying sowing the seeds of doubt, paranoia and discord amongst the general population, playing into primal fears and using disinformation.

Hopefully, if (and only if) Omicron is the final chapter in this drama, the need for vaccination of the general population will dissappear and we can put this issue to rest. But I'm afraid that in the event of another pandemic, lack of trust in vaccination will become an even bigger problem than this time around.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 09, 2022, 03:38:54 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 09, 2022, 03:21:05 AM
That's really great to hear - congratulations.

+1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 09, 2022, 04:40:30 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 09, 2022, 03:18:13 AM
My wife has finally tested negative over two consecutive days so we will go out for a walk today.
:)
Hurrah!  Is she feeling any after-effects, tiredness, etc.?

Enjoy your walk.

I'd be curious to hear from folks here--particularly any Australians as to what they think about the whole Novak Djokovic situation (fighting not to be deported and be allowed to play in the Australian Open).  I've been following the story fairly carefully after it broke.  Without reiterating everything that I've heard and/or read, it seems like a big mess.  Tennis Australia seemed to be going by one set of rules for medical exemptions from being fully vaccinated and being able to get into the park to play vs. what the ABF allows as legitimate reasons for being allowed into the country in the first place.  Novak apparently stated that he had tested positive for Covid in mid-December and had been given a medical exemption by two panels of medical experts (supposedly the experts didn't know who was asking for the exemptions and only a handle were granted).  He then stated on I believe it was his Facebook page that he had been given a ME, but in the time that it took from him to fly from Dubai to Australia with his team, his visa had been revoked.   I had heard also that he applied for the wrong type of visa?

To make a long (and getting longer) story short, he is now in a "hotel" along with asylum seekers (some of whom have, it seems, been there for YEARS) and at least one other tennis player (rounded up after she had already been playing tennis in Australia for a week).

All kinds of questions here including how come other people managed to get through customs if they had also been given MEs for the same reason as Novak in the first place?  Why would the TA medical experts give out exemptions to tennis players as apparently Craig Tiley had asked questions to the Australian health department and from what I understand been told back in November that everyone had to be *double-jabbed...and then there's also confusion as to how the Victorian government was  involved, if at all, with all of this too.  From what I understand, CT is saying that he received conflicting information from the federal government (I'm having trouble accessing the latest stories at the moment).

*Or have other legitimate medical reasons for not having been fully vaccinated....and I believe then would need to self-quarantine for two weeks?  Non-legitimate including having had tested positive for Covid within the past 6 months.

Can anyone here shed further light on the above?  And last I heard, Novak's lawyers launched an appeal; that will happen at 10 a.m. Monday (Australian time).

Novak had skirted around his vaccination status for ages, and for whatever reason, didn't want to get vaccinated.  From what I've heard, many Australians are furious with him for not getting vaccinated and then wanting to come into Australia--particularly after all of the lock-downs.  I would appreciate any news and/or impressions from what you've heard/read.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 09, 2022, 05:55:40 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 09, 2022, 02:24:33 AM
Last paragraph of the article:

child health expert, Professor Helen Bedford of University College London, warned that there was a danger in lumping diehard anti-vaxxers with people who have nagging doubts about getting a vaccine. "If you do that you will miss the chance to persuade those who have genuine concerns but who could change their minds and get vaccinated. It does not help to criticise them all as talking mumbo-jumbo."


Not at all coincidentally, people I know who work in health care have expressed grave concerns about vaccinating young children as a matter of course - and these are adults who have been fully vaccinated, I hasten to add - yet when one turns to the corporate press, the unrelenting propaganda has it that young children really ought to be vaccinated.

Such thinking, combined with misinformation, can seep into the thinking of the allegedly best and brightest, who have the power to influence what happens to tens of millions of people: Justice Sotomayor incorrect on 'serious' child COVID-19 cases (https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-052172757066)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 09, 2022, 07:44:01 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 09, 2022, 04:40:30 AM
Hurrah!  Is she feeling any after-effects, tiredness, etc.?

Enjoy your walk.

I'd be curious to hear from folks here--particularly any Australians as to what they think about the whole Novak Djokovic situation (fighting not to be deported and be allowed to play in the Australian Open).  I've been following the story fairly carefully after it broke.  Without reiterating everything that I've heard and/or read, it seems like a big mess.  Tennis Australia seemed to be going by one set of rules for medical exemptions from being fully vaccinated and being able to get into the park to play vs. what the ABF allows as legitimate reasons for being allowed into the country in the first place.  Novak apparently stated that he had tested positive for Covid in mid-December and had been given a medical exemption by two panels of medical experts (supposedly the experts didn't know who was asking for the exemptions and only a handle were granted).  He then stated on I believe it was his Facebook page that he had been given a ME, but in the time that it took from him to fly from Dubai to Australia with his team, his visa had been revoked.   I had heard also that he applied for the wrong type of visa?

To make a long (and getting longer) story short, he is now in a "hotel" along with asylum seekers (some of whom have, it seems, been there for YEARS) and at least one other tennis player (rounded up after she had already been playing tennis in Australia for a week).

All kinds of questions here including how come other people managed to get through customs if they had also been given MEs for the same reason as Novak in the first place?  Why would the TA medical experts give out exemptions to tennis players as apparently Craig Tiley had asked questions to the Australian health department and from what I understand been told back in November that everyone had to be *double-jabbed...and then there's also confusion as to how the Victorian government was  involved, if at all, with all of this too.  From what I understand, CT is saying that he received conflicting information from the federal government (I'm having trouble accessing the latest stories at the moment).

*Or have other legitimate medical reasons for not having been fully vaccinated....and I believe then would need to self-quarantine for two weeks?  Non-legitimate including having had tested positive for Covid within the past 6 months.

Can anyone here shed further light on the above?  And last I heard, Novak's lawyers launched an appeal; that will happen at 10 a.m. Monday (Australian time).

Novak had skirted around his vaccination status for ages, and for whatever reason, didn't want to get vaccinated.  From what I've heard, many Australians are furious with him for not getting vaccinated and then wanting to come into Australia--particularly after all of the lock-downs.  I would appreciate any news and/or impressions from what you've heard/read.

PD
Well, this has been quite helpful:  https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1479288238116196360  Quite an interesting discussion and info.

Though the "plot thickens"...in terms of when he applied for an exemption--and the deadline that they indicated to apply for an ME by--and also when Novak tested positive for Covid, and his participation in events around that time (and also maskless)...when did he receive the results of the testing too?  And how much of this is political maneuvering ahead of elections?   :-\

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 09, 2022, 07:49:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on January 09, 2022, 03:18:13 AM
My wife has finally tested negative over two consecutive days so we will go out for a walk today.
:)

Huzzah!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 09, 2022, 08:02:38 AM
I know exactly one vaccine-doubter who expresses his doubts intelligently (part of which, in this context, involves the possibility that he is mistaken). And BTW, he is vaccinated. If a doubter expresses himself like an asshole (and even though I'm a proponent of If they tell you who they are, believe them, let's split hairs and say that [expresses himself like an asshole] ≠ [is simply an asshole]), and complains that he's lumped in with the mumbo-jumbo anti-vaxxers, Vulcan could throw snowballs sooner than our hypothetical good-faith vaccine-doubter could very well pin the blame on anyone other than himself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: fbjim on January 09, 2022, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: amw on January 08, 2022, 02:09:04 PM
The main reason in western countries is that material reality has become so disconnected from people's everyday experience that we are no longer capable of perceiving it. As such, everyone determines what their own reality is, and consensus on facts is not possible.

The most depressing example of this - many of us live in a reality where we are so - to use a buzzword - atomized from communities that a high death count simply doesn't register. So many of us no longer live in situations where everyone knows when someone on the block, or in the town dies - everything just goes on unless it happens to a close friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 09, 2022, 09:13:26 AM
Quote from: fbjim on January 09, 2022, 08:20:47 AM
The most depressing example of this - many of us live in a reality where we are so - to use a buzzword - atomized from communities that a high death count simply doesn't register. So many of us no longer live in situations where everyone knows when someone on the block, or in the town dies - everything just goes on unless it happens to a close friend.


I very seriously doubt GMG offers a reasonable representation of the general population and the experiences of that population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on January 09, 2022, 10:25:06 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 10:29:31 PM
And meanwhile people refuse vaccines. Often the same people who have pointless deadly objects lying around their house.
Someone who leaves guns lying around their house, with kids in it, rather than in a safe in a home without kids, yet is worried about vaccines, is indeed a moron.


Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 10:29:31 PM
The "massive cost" reference was to your stupid proposal to install a camera in every home. Not to vaccine mandates.
Oh ok, gotcha.
"MASSIVE cost and (contrary to your assertion) no real benefit"
this is where I'm confused, I thought I had implied that there would be a huge benefit, being that gun violence wouldn't exist any more.



Quote from: Madiel on January 08, 2022, 10:29:31 PM
The one thing people like you won't actually countenance is the thing that actually works: reducing the number of pointless deadly objects you have lying around houses.
I don't own guns, if you are implying that.
Countless criminals/gangs own guns, and they aren't going to give them up if the government is asking them to.
Look, if making them illegal would make them disappear, I'd totally vote on making them illegal.


Quote from: SimonNZ on January 09, 2022, 12:03:22 AM
My impression is that the anti-vax people and the anti-mask people are a pretty big Venn diagram overlap. And are responding to the same sources of disinformation.

You don't seem to be seeing that.
Yeah. Because if you are only looking at mainstream news sources, they are in support of mandates so they have motivation to make it look like anti-vaxxers and anti-mandaters are completely the same because of the term "anti-vaxx" being associated with being anti-previous vaccines (full of crazy people), when, although there is overlap, they are separate things.

Anyways, there is no right or wrong to this issue, there are only tradeoffs/pros and cons, and different people's thoughts should be heard, instead of people being entirely baffled by how others feel, maybe engaging in discussion can help expand understanding. Which is the point of discussion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on January 09, 2022, 11:33:47 AM
Thanks so much for the kind comments about my wife which are greatly appreciated  :)
In answer to PD she is still quite tired although she was still miles ahead of me on our walk today. She has gone to bed early today, leaning me to type away here in peace  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 11:34:56 AM
Why is it that anytime someone refers to "mainstream news sources" my eye twitches?

Anyway, vaccine mandates aren't much of a news story here. As previously mentioned, we don't have to wrestle with huge swathes of the population not wanting to get vaccinated. My sources aren't media organisations. My sources are living in a culture that isn't riven by paranoia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 11:50:22 AM
As for Novak Djokovic: the current impression I have is that Tennis Australia stuffed up badly. They're busily saying they didn't knowingly mislead the players. I strongly suspect they incompetently misled the players instead.

For one thing, there are indications that they took information that was about being allowed to travel WITHIN Australia, between different States, and applied it to entry into Australia.

I can well believe they might have done that because my professional experience is that people are really, REALLY bad at reading and applying those sorts of little connecting words. Someone could very easily have seen an exemption list on a website page they were referred to and failed to process exactly what the exemptions were for (same as I now see some people talking about Tennis Australia and Victoria granting an exemption without any awareness that that was an exemption to play in Melbourne not an exemption to enter the country).

The federal government would have happily referred Tennis Australia to a website that included information about travelling between States because most of the players ARE travelling between States. There has just been a lead-up tournament in Adelaide, another is in Sydney, and I think there are 1 or 2 others in other States as well. This is relevant information, including to Australian players who don't need a visa to enter the country if they've been playing overseas, but who WOULD at times need permission to cross State borders (same as any Australian has experienced during the pandemic). Plus some of the quarantine requirements have been run by the States throughout, whether you are coming from interstate or overseas.

But there is also evidence that the federal government explicitly told Tennis Australia that prior infection with Covid was not an exemption ground for entering the country, as controlled by federal law.

Faced with a contradiction between this explicit instruction and what they thought they were reading on a website, Tennis Australia seems not to have clarified what was going on.

So my suspicion is high that someone at Tennis Australia believed that one set of criteria was what they needed for all purposes, failing to grasp, despite nearly 2 years of lived experience about how responsibilities in our system are very split on these issues, that a whole summer of Australian tennis with tournaments across the whole country would involve half a dozen different sets of legal rules that wouldn't necessarily be consistent.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 09, 2022, 12:00:22 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 11:34:56 AM
Why is it that anytime someone refers to "mainstream news sources" my eye twitches?

Anyway, vaccine mandates aren't much of a news story here. As previously mentioned, we don't have to wrestle with huge swathes of the population not wanting to get vaccinated. My sources aren't media organisations. My sources are living in a culture that isn't riven by paranoia.

I can only dream of vaccine mandates not being a news story in the states.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 09, 2022, 12:53:41 PM
COVID may become endemic — meaning the virus and its mutations may never disappear

By Hanna Krueger and Mark Arsenault Globe Staff, Updated January 8, 2022, 3:25 p.m.

On the Fourth of July, President Biden peered out on the South Lawn of the White House and made a bold declaration: "We've gained the upper hand against this virus."[wonder if Andrei will consider this a "lie"—kh]

His remarks were met with applause from a crowd eager to heave a sigh of relief for the first time in 16 months. The theme of the celebration? "America's Back Together." The prospect was so promising that Biden's next words hardly registered.

"Don't get me wrong, COVID-19 has not been vanquished. We all know powerful variants have emerged," he cautioned.

Six months later, America is averaging nearly 650,000 cases a day. Officially, there have been 7.4 million cases of COVID-19 since Christmas, meaning one positive test per every 50 Americans.

The virus did not cooperate with the president's Independence Day vision. It mutated. A lot.

"Frankly, I'm still sort of in shock at what is happening at this stage of the pandemic," admitted Akiko Iwasaki, a virologist at Yale University studying the mechanisms of immune defense against viruses.

But even within this current viral blizzard, there are glimmers of hope. Signs that Omicron is less virulent than Delta. That the variant's dozens of mutations may blunt the effectiveness of the vaccine, but do not obliterate the protection the shots offer. That treatments developed these past two years can mitigate some of the most dire cases. That there will one day come a time when we are not at the mercy of the virus, our plans derailed, texts filled with dread, emergency rooms full, and eyes glued to little pink lines on rapid tests.

"I don't think there will be a certain day we declare victory," said Dr. Marc Lipsitch, director of the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. "But we could be moving toward a world in which the virus is endemic but it's less harmful to us — not because the virus has changed, but because we have."

To become endemic means that COVID-19 may never disappear — gone the hopes of a zero COVID future — but it may be defanged by layers of immunity, gained through natural infection and a regular vaccine regimen, as well as a menu of antiviral treatments that lessen the severity of symptoms. The virus will no doubt still pose potentially grave threats to the elderly and medically vulnerable, but the scale of suffering could be much lower, closer to what we endured in the worst flu seasons before COVID's arrival.

To be clear: We are nowhere near that point. The worst week of a particularly virulent flu season might see some 35,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths in the United States. Right now, COVID-19 is responsible for roughly 850,000 hospitalizations and 10,400 deaths a week.[emphasis mine—kh] And those stark figures are being tallied in a country with widely available vaccines and several treatments for those infected. As we enter the third calendar year of the pandemic, much of the world still has little access to vaccines at all.

Given the yawning discrepancies, many experts are understandably reluctant to speculate about how the pandemic may end. The idea of learning to live with a virus that continues to strain hospitals and kill thousands of people a day is a grim mental exercise.

"Tied directly to the question of how we can get ourselves to endemic status is the question of how many people are we willing to let die or be permanently disabled in order to get to that point," said Megan Ranney, an emergency physician at Rhode Island Hospital who has served on the front lines of the pandemic for two years now.

In a letter sent to the student body in December, Northeastern University chancellor Ken Henderson declared: "As we move into this endemic phase of the pandemic, our job is to continue to control COVID effectively, not let COVID control us."

Far larger institutions and government agencies have quietly begun to grapple with the question of how the country learns to live with COVID-19. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's controversial move to slash the recommended time in isolation for people who catch COVID, from 10 days to five, was rooted in a determination to keep society running even amid record-high case counts.

Shorter quarantines could well hasten the already lightning spread of Omicron. It is likely the costs — death, the possibility of widespread long COVID, and nearly crippled hospitals — will be significant. But the astonishing tempo and reach of the Omicron variant could signal a turning point in the pandemic, some experts say.

"It is possible that Omicron is the last big variant and we will see variations, but they will mostly be sons of Omicron and not pose too big a threat to immunity. This is a highly transmissible variant so it's going to be hard to displace it," said William Moss, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "In this case, Omicron would indeed be the last big wave and we settle into an endemic pattern where COVID is with us, but not posing an existential threat. If I were a betting man, that would be my bet."

He then added: "But I am not a betting man with this virus."

Still, such projections are bolstered by recent bright spots in the data. South Africa's December Omicron wave peaked quickly, and case numbers have been plummeting since Dec. 18. In the wake of the South African spike, researchers have found evidence that people who have recovered from Omicron appear to be resistant to the Delta variant, according to a small study published by South African scientists in late December.

But it is wishful thinking to think that the wildfire spread of Omicron will usher in the final transition from pandemic to endemic without a continuing vaccination push and surveillance efforts to trace the virus's trail.

"We absolutely cannot just throw up our hands and say, you know, we're done with this virus," said Ranney. "Because you'd think we'd know this by now, but the virus does not magically disappear."

In a series of op-eds published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on Thursday, six of the public health experts who made up Biden's now defunct COVID-19 advisory board emphasized the need to put infrastructure in place that prevents the country from being stuck in "a perpetual state of emergency."

The essays dripped with measured criticism of the administration's handling of the current surge. Among their sprawling list of pleas: vaccine mandates, investment in next-generation vaccines that match circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, affordable and accessible testing and therapeutic interventions, and a comprehensive surveillance system for emerging variants.

The last two years of shutdown and sacrifice have given researchers the chance not only to develop vaccines but also crucial medical treatments that could also dramatically improve our ability to live with COVID. When they become broadly available, oral antiviral drugs like the Pfizer pill Paxlovid could be game changers in treating infections in vulnerable people, much like Tamiflu treats influenza.

"With these new oral therapies, absolutely I can imagine a place where the virus is around but as no more than a nuisance," said Asish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health.

But the scale of their success hinges on the availability of widespread testing: We have to know who is infected to know whom to treat. The new regimens dramatically reduce the risk of COVID-19, but infected high-risk patients must be able to get tested, and then treated, quickly enough for the pills to make a difference. Paxlovid's promising results assume the drugs can be administered in a narrow window — as early as 72 hours after symptoms emerge. US testing capacity continues to be plagued by a host of problems, including supply-chain bottlenecks and staffing shortages, that have left many Americans waiting several hours to days for results.

Even so, the supply does currently exist to use these treatments widely. The New York Times reported that New York City in one week burned through all 1,300 treatment courses of Paxlovid that it received in late December. On Tuesday, the US government doubled its order, but the drug won't be plentiful until April at the earliest.

"None of these [treatments] are useful today so unfortunately we're dealing with this surge without them. It is brutal," said Howard Koh, former assistant secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

"And it is going to be brutal for the next several weeks."

As our ability to stave off the worst of COVID-19 improves, the virus will never truly go away. That leaves open the possibility that it will once again mutate into a "variant of concern." While Omicron's 50 mutations have seemingly made the strain less virulent, they also make clear just how adaptable this virus is — and the humility required in any discussions about what the future may hold.

"The big wild card for me is the emergence of a new variant and its ability to escape immunity," said Moss, of Johns Hopkins. "There is the extreme scenario where a potential variant has complete immune escape and basically acts like a new virus. Had Omicron not come about with so many mutations then this wouldn't be as big of a wild card, but it did."

Early detection of extreme mutations will enable scientists to test and tweak current vaccines and treatments so that they remain effective against new variants. (Think about hemming a mother's wedding dress for a daughter rather than sewing a whole new one.) If a health system or laboratory is too slow to detect and report a concerning variant, the chance to contain its spread and, in potentially dire cases, adapt to its mutations will come too late.

Omicron's swift ascent and the sprawling testing lines it has caused have provided a glimpse at how quickly COVID-19 could rage back if a new variant capable of evading natural and vaccine immunity arose.

"I would be remiss to say that I was confident because this virus again and again has fooled us," said Ranney. "We've declared victory more than once before and we've been wrong."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 01:37:24 PM
Karl, all every consistent with other things I've seen. But then I suspect my media is very mainstream.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 09, 2022, 02:55:13 PM
QuoteI'd be curious to hear from folks here--particularly any Australians as to what they think about the whole Novak Djokovic situation (fighting not to be deported and be allowed to play in the Australian Open).  I've been following the story fairly carefully after it broke.  Without reiterating everything that I've heard and/or read, it seems like a big mess.  Tennis Australia seemed to be going by one set of rules for medical exemptions from being fully vaccinated and being able to get into the park to play vs. what the ABF allows as legitimate reasons for being allowed into the country in the first place.  Novak apparently stated that he had tested positive for Covid in mid-December and had been given a medical exemption by two panels of medical experts (supposedly the experts didn't know who was asking for the exemptions and only a handle were granted).  He then stated on I believe it was his Facebook page that he had been given a ME, but in the time that it took from him to fly from Dubai to Australia with his team, his visa had been revoked.   I had heard also that he applied for the wrong type of visa?

As has been evident throughout the last couple of years, communication between groups over everything Covid in Australia has been poor to downright non-existent and with two levels of government as well as a sporting body involved, this has been shown to be the case. The incompetence is largely on Tennis Australia's part and this is why I think so.

The Djokovic vaccination situation has been circulating in the Australian media for at least six months now with speculation about whether he is eligible to be allowed to play. TA, has had plenty of time to do some research and consult with the correct people to ensure the status of their major draw card. What TA apparently has not done (though this is not confirmed) is advise Novak Djokovic of the exact legal rights and requirements regarding entry into Australia. A couple of well placed phone calls by TAs legal team could have had this clarified months ago. That said, nobody has asked any of the other players coming from overseas what they were informed about when they made application to take part in the tournament. Did they get the information they needed? Was it accurate? Did it cover all contingencies? we don't know yet.

If that information, which should have been in writing, was not accurate/present then Djokovic has grounds to feel aggrieved and possibly be able to take legal action. The public anger stems from double standards where for many months, bona fide Australian citizens have not been able to return home while a host of media, sports and entertainment stars who are not even Australians have been welcomed with open arms and jumped ahead of them in the queue. Aussies hate queue jumpers with a passion!

From my perspective it's simple (or should be). There are a set of rules and they should apply equally to everybody who wants to enter the country. Djokovic's apparent prevarication regarding vaccine status has certainly not helped his cause and the comments his father made to the media (taken out of context or not) have probably made things worse.

While writing this a couple of question has cropped up. If I was wanting to fly to Australia, surely I would need to provide documentation to the airline that is landing me in Australia (Emirates?) that I was eligible to enter. Also, don't the ABF have a role in this also? After all, theirs is the final say.

In short this is a clusterf*** of the highest order.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 09, 2022, 03:27:10 PM
Quote from: Holden on January 09, 2022, 02:55:13 PM
If I was wanting to fly to Australia, surely I would need to provide documentation to the airline that is landing me in Australia (Emirates?) that I was eligible to enter.

I've been thinking about this aspect too, about how he got on the plane.

If it's only checked by the airline, rather than any Australian government officials, then I think this can be answered: he did have documentation. He had a visa. He had a letter from Tennis Australia about a medical exemption, which might well have said "he has been granted a medical exemption" without going into the exact details of the grounds for it. And even if it did go into the flawed ground for the exemption, I'm not sure that would have been something that airline staff would be sufficiently well-versed in.

So I can well believe that he presented to the airline as someone who could enter Australia. I can well believe that Djokovic himself believed that he could enter Australia.

He would hardly be the first person in the world to arrive in a country and only then discover that they can't get in. He'd just be an unusually high-profile example. Certainly I can remember getting an authority to travel to the USA and being aware that USA immigration could decide to refuse me entry. I actually had dramas crossing back into the USA from Canada. The border guards in Vermont insisted I had to pay for some new thing before they would allow me entry. I knew they were wrong (and this was proved on a later trouble-free crossing on the west coast) but I didn't dare argue with them about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 12:34:23 AM
Novak Djokovic wins court battle, free to play in Australian Open (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-10/novak-djokovic-australian-deportation-court-hearing-melbourne/100747256)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 01:59:46 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 12:34:23 AM
Novak Djokovic wins court battle, free to play in Australian Open (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-10/novak-djokovic-australian-deportation-court-hearing-melbourne/100747256)

Until the government cancels his visa anyway, which it very well might.

From what I can gather (with Australian lawyer's hat on) it's a decision that the cancellation process was improper, not a decision about the merits of cancellation. This is pretty typical for administrative law.  It's not a conclusion that his visa can't be cancelled. It's a conclusion that the process of cancellation was flawed (much was made of the timeline and how Djokovic didn't have a proper opportunity to get help and clarification from Tennis Australia).

The federal government pretty clearly has the view that Tennis Australia did the wrong thing and gave assurances to players, including Djokovic, that Tennis Australia was not authorised to give.  And 2 other people in the same situation have now left the country. So it wouldn't surprise me in the least if his visa still got cancelled.

I'm even firmer now in the view that this wasn't Djokovic's fault personally. He relied on what he was told by Tennis Australia and the Victorian Government. What he was told by Tennis Australia simply seems to have been inconsistent with what the federal government had told Tennis Australia. The question in my mind is whether the federal government will decide to hold off, given that Djokovic wasn't personally to blame and given the political fallout if they kick him out of the country. But there might actually be bigger political fallout, within Australia, if they don't kick him out. Either way it's going to be a mess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 02:22:23 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 01:59:46 AM
Until the government cancels his visa anyway, which it very well might.

From what I can gather (with Australian lawyer's hat on) it's a decision that the cancellation process was improper, not a decision about the merits of cancellation. This is pretty typical for administrative law.  It's not a conclusion that his visa can't be cancelled. It's a conclusion that the process of cancellation was flawed (much was made of the timeline and how Djokovic didn't have a proper opportunity to get help and clarification from Tennis Australia).

The federal government pretty clearly has the view that Tennis Australia did the wrong thing and gave assurances to players, including Djokovic, that Tennis Australia was not authorised to give.  And 2 other people in the same situation have now left the country. So it wouldn't surprise me in the least if his visa still got cancelled.

I'm even firmer now in the view that this wasn't Djokovic's fault personally. He relied on what he was told by Tennis Australia and the Victorian Government. What he was told by Tennis Australia simply seems to have been inconsistent with what the federal government had told Tennis Australia. The question in my mind is whether the federal government will decide to hold off, given that Djokovic wasn't personally to blame and given the political fallout if they kick him out of the country. But there might actually be bigger political fallout, within Australia, if they don't kick him out. Either way it's going to be a mess.

I think this is a very accurate assessment.

Now, if you heard Romanian political commentators you wouldn't believe your ears and couldn't help LYAOL ROTFL. They are basically split in two camps: (1) Djokovic is an anti-vaxxer asshole who created the whole mess singlehandedly in order to push the anti-vaxx agenda, and (2) Djokovic is a hero of freedom of thought and speech and a victim of Aussie totalitarianism --- both of them sheer nonsense.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 02:30:53 AM
When checking, it can be seen that the poor kid has hit the ball successfully for more than 153 mio dollars, to which can be added sponsorships, appearances etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 02:46:27 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 02:22:23 AM
I think this is a very accurate assessment.

Now, if you heard Romanian political commentators you wouldn't believe your ears and couldn't help LYAOL ROTFL. They are basically split in two camps: (1) Djokovic is an anti-vaxxer asshole who created the whole mess singlehandedly in order to push the anti-vaxx agenda, and (2) Djokovic is a hero of freedom of thought and speech and a victim of Aussie totalitarianism --- both of them sheer nonsense.

View (1) is not that far away from the view of many Australians. Djokovic might be admired but he is not often loved in the way that Federer is, and that was before any of us had heard about coronaviruses. The business where he organised his own tournament and there was much infection was met with a fair bit of scorn here. The level of sympathy for him right now is fairly low, and the only real reason he has sympathy is because plenty of Australians have first-hand experience of how complicated our pandemic rules have been. Against that is a sense that he just had to get vaccinated instead of believing some very weird and unscientific things. Nadal's opinion on the situation is getting quoted.

View (2) is quite possibly found in the Serbian-Australian community which is pretty obsessed with him.

I can say from personal experience that being at a match at the Australian Open when a Serb is playing can be pretty annoying... this is not unique, in that there are many ethnic groups in Australia who will come out and support a player from the relevant part of the world. But the Serbs definitely rank among the noisier... and my view is probably heavily coloured by the fantastic 5-set match that was nearly ruined by the 2 guys behind me who were paying almost no attention to the tennis, beyond cheering when it was time for Serbs to cheered, and who spent several hours rambling endlessly about all sorts of inane stuff (including which girls in the crowd they wanted) until I finally turned around and told them to shut the fuck up.

Anyway, if Djokovic does end up playing this year, I suspect the atmosphere at his matches will be insufferable. He's the kind of player that will probably just be spurred on by that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 10, 2022, 03:00:11 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 02:30:53 AM
When checking, it can be seen that the poor kid has hit the ball successfully for more than 153 mio dollars, to which can be added sponsorships, appearances etc.

I feel sorry for him. I wouldn't know what to do with all that money.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:00:52 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 02:46:27 AM
I can say from personal experience that being at a match at the Australian Open when a Serb is playing can be pretty annoying... this is not unique, in that there are many ethnic groups in Australia who will come out and support a player from the relevant part of the world. But the Serbs definitely rank among the noisier... and my view is probably heavily coloured by the fantastic 5-set match that was nearly ruined by the 2 guys behind me who were paying almost no attention to the tennis, beyond cheering when it was time for Serbs to cheered, and who spent several hours rambling endlessly about all sorts of inane stuff (including which girls in the crowd they wanted) until I finally turned around and told them to shut the fuck up.

They were obviously much less patriotic than they considered themselves; had they truly been Serbian patriots, they'd have talked to each other in Serbian and you wouldn't have been able to understand anything at all.  :laugh:

QuoteAnyway, if Djokovic does end up playing this year, I suspect the atmosphere at his matches will be insufferable. He's the kind of player that will probably just be spurred on by that.

I wonder what will happen if he is allowed to play and wins the tournament...  ???
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:18:20 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 01:59:46 AM
I'm even firmer now in the view that this wasn't Djokovic's fault personally. He relied on what he was told by Tennis Australia and the Victorian Government.

Actually, who granted him the visa? The Victorian government or the federal government?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:21:39 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:00:52 AM
They were obviously much less patriotic than they considered themselves; had they truly been Serbian patriots, they'd have talked to each other in Serbian and you wouldn't have been able to understand anything at all.  :laugh:
Ha. I'm not sure many of their generation speak the language well, if at all. This doesn't diminish the community sense, especially when it comes to sport. Multiculturalism is a part of the Australian landscape, and the Australian Open is perhaps the best single sporting event for bringing it out.

The Dutch and the Swedes tend to be a lot funnier.

Quote
I wonder what will happen if he is allowed to play and wins the tournament...  ???

Given how darn good he is at winning it, we would probably find out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:24:50 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:18:20 AM
Actually, who granted him the visa? The Victorian government or the federal government?

Federal.

I think it's the Victorian government that got to say he wouldn't need to quarantine. That's a whole other weird situation which we don't need to get into. But visas is most definitely a federal thing.

If I understand the timeline, though, he got the visa well before the medical exemption and before he contracted Covid in December. So the visa process simply must have been a thing that said "so far it looks like everything is in order".

The bits of transcript that I've seen show Djokovic repeatedly mentioning Tennis Australia and the Victorian government. Not the federal. So to me part of the problem is that his communication was all with the people who had control of the tennis tournament, not the people who had control of the border. The visa process was like a website or something, not full communication.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:32:05 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:21:39 AM
(...)
The Dutch and the Swedes tend to be a lot funnier.
(...)

My impression is that Serbian funniness has been deposited temporarily, on some location hidden from the enemies;
I might be wrong, though. It's been rough times there. Serbian and Croatian sport fans can tend to be rather tough.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:36:25 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 10, 2022, 03:00:11 AM
I feel sorry for him. I wouldn't know what to do with all that money.

A lot from the usual check list, it seems - a collection of luxury cars, a collection of luxury houses abroad, a yacht, etc.

Some charity donations and running a Serbian cafe chain named after himself as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:41:59 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:24:50 AM
Federal.

I think it's the Victorian government that got to say he wouldn't need to quarantine. That's a whole other weird situation which we don't need to get into. But visas is most definitely a federal thing.

If I understand the timeline, though, he got the visa well before the medical exemption and before he contracted Covid in December. So the visa process simply must have been a thing that said "so far it looks like everything is in order".

Even at that time it was well-known that he wasn't vaccinated. If ''no jab, no entry" was the rule admitting of no exceptions, then how come he did get the visa in the first place? Failure to produce vaccination proof should have resulted in a flat denial, yet it didn't. It's all so puzzling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:47:39 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:32:05 AM
My impression is that Serbian funniness has been deposited temporarily, on some location hidden from the enemies;

Considering their history, including fairly recent one, it's no surprise they are not among the funniest people. Also no surprise they tend to be extremely vocal about, and fond of, their national icons. I can't fault them on either issue.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:50:21 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:36:25 AM
A lot from the usual check list, it seems - a collection of luxury cars, a collection of luxury houses abroad, a yacht, etc.

Some charity donations

Well, that's pretty commo stuff for top tennis players, most (all?) of whom are extremely rich. Djokovic is hardly an exceptional or exceptionable case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:57:39 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 03:41:59 AM
Even at that time it was well-known that he wasn't vaccinated. If ''no jab, no entry" was the rule admitting of no exceptions, then how come he did get the visa in the first place? Failure to produce vaccination proof should have resulted in a flat denial, yet it didn't. It's all so puzzling.

There's always been exceptions. There still are. It's accepted that some people cannot get vaccinated for sound medical reasons. For example, there is a local football player who nearly died from a reaction to a vaccination when he was younger, and said that he therefore would not be getting a covid vaccination. I think this was widely recognised as a perfectly good reason to say no.

But the federal government specifically said to Tennis Australia that "I've been infected in the last 6 months" was not one of the exceptions they would accept.

There are hints that he had paperwork from TA saying "he has a medical exemption". It's only when you interrogate the basis for granting that medical exemption that you discover the problem.

As to it being well-known that he wasn't vaccinated... Djokovic constantly plays coy about whether he's vaccinated or not. Though I agree that surely means he isn't vaccinated. If he was vaccinated but refused to reveal that to the government, then I have zero sympathy for him at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 04:06:52 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 03:57:39 AM
the federal government specifically said to Tennis Australia that "I've been infected in the last 6 months" was not one of the exceptions they would accept.

And yet the same federal government granted a visa to Djokovic who claimed medical exemption on exactly that ground. Or as you say, quite possibly granted him a visa before he even claimed that, thus having no ground at all for an exemption.

(https://c.tenor.com/0J5SNGbF-gUAAAAj/gem-dizzy.gif)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 04:26:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 04:06:52 AM
And yet the same federal government granted a visa to Djokovic who claimed medical exemption on exactly that ground. Or as you say, quite possibly granted him a visa before he even claimed that, thus having no ground at all for an exemption.

(https://c.tenor.com/0J5SNGbF-gUAAAAj/gem-dizzy.gif)

Yes. Because a visa is not the end of the process. Which he clearly knew given that he applied for an exemption afterwards!

A visa simply isn't a guarantee of entry into a country. It's one of the requirements. There are checks before grant, but that doesn't mean there can't be any requirements later. In fact I'm quite certain that the relevant Australian laws on visas have a section for conditions at the time of application and a separate section for conditions at the time of arriving in Australia, and while the conditions might overlap they aren't identical. And I'm talking completely separately from the Covid issue, this is just generally.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 10, 2022, 04:44:14 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:36:25 AM
A lot from the usual check list, it seems - a collection of luxury cars, a collection of luxury houses abroad, a yacht, etc.

Some charity donations and running a Serbian cafe chain named after himself as well.
MT, Karl and others,

From what I understand, he's done a lot to help kids/education in Serbia (as well as donating to other causes....including donating money to Australia after those horrible wildfires).  https://novakdjokovicfoundation.org

I recall hearing over the years about his rough upbringing (Not 100% positive, but believe that when he was young, that he and his family were homeless at one point?).  And learning how to play tennis at the bottom of an (obviously empty) swimming pool wouldn't have been easy either.  Can't imagine what it would have been like either to have grown up during the breakup of Yugoslavia and the subsequent turmoil, fighting and genocide.

Madiel,

Yes, I know about those "warm-up" tournaments to the open; I've been watching some of the matches (time difference is rough if I want to watch any of them live).  And envious that you've been to the Australian Open before!  Perhaps in the tennis thread, you could share some of your experiences there?

I sometimes read Ben Rothenberg's Twitter postings (He apparently was also on CNN last night--which I missed).  Read the news this morning re the hearing results.  One of the things that BR brought up which I read yesterday was that (and he posted a photo) the deadline to apply for a ME was December 10th.  Apparently Novak (at some point) stated that he had tested positive (or had his test done on that day) on December 16th.  He also appeared at some events a day or two after that and maskless.  I'd like to think that if he knew that he was positive at the time of events that he wouldn't have gone.  I hope that that was the case.  https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1479731802302410755

He's an amazing tennis player.  I have huge respect for him in that regard and others....as a human being.  No, I don't agree with his vax stance and he shouldn't be given (or have been if true) any special line-hopping/entrance allowances especially over other Australians trying to return home...or anyone else trying to enter Australia.

Will be interesting to see whether or not the federal government decides to push for him to leave; at this point, I'd be quite surprised if they did.

PD

p.s.  And thank you for your legal comments!  It helps to try and make sense of this confusing mess!   ::)  Just read your latest one Madiel.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 06:08:57 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 04:26:42 AM
Yes. Because a visa is not the end of the process. Which he clearly knew given that he applied for an exemption afterwards!

A visa simply isn't a guarantee of entry into a country. It's one of the requirements. There are checks before grant, but that doesn't mean there can't be any requirements later. In fact I'm quite certain that the relevant Australian laws on visas have a section for conditions at the time of application and a separate section for conditions at the time of arriving in Australia, and while the conditions might overlap they aren't identical.

I am aware of all that and it's common sense.

Actually, I think there might be a way to get to the origin of the whole mess.

I don't think the visa application and granting process is completely automated. I mean, yes you upload the application form and the relevant documentation online but I believe that at some point a federal civil servant reviews them and decides to grant the visa or to deny it; moreover, there must be a record kept about who and when granted or denied the visa, that also files all documents pertaining to that particular application. If that is indeed the case, then the only one who can clear up the mess is that civil servant who granted Djokovic the visa. Now, there are only two cases possible: either the documentation was fully compliant with the federal law at the time of granting, or it was not. If the former, then the federal government should indicate what changes in the federal law took place between the granting of the visa and Djokovic's entrance in Australia that rendered the visa invalid; if the latter, then the responsibility for the whole kerfuffle falls entirely on the civil servant.

My two cents as a non-lawyer, non-legal expert. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 10, 2022, 06:24:42 AM
What amazes me is that the question of whether a tennis player can flout vaccination rules and enter a country anyway just because his celebrity status is high enough and the tennis tournament is apparently more important than health policy.

And my exposure to the immigration/border control system leads me to believe that individuals, including the person reviewing your passport and travel documents as you enter the country, have wide latitude to interpret rules as they see fit. I remember reading that performances of Taneyev quartets by the Carpe Diem quartet at a music festival in the UK had to be canceled because one of the quartet members had been denied entry at the border. The work permit was denied because the border control agent decided that there were lots of string quartets in the UK who could perform Taneyev and there was no need for foreign labor. There was no international incident in that case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 10, 2022, 06:30:42 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 10, 2022, 06:24:42 AM
What amazes me is that the question of whether a tennis player can flout vaccination rules and enter a country anyway just because his celebrity status is high enough and the tennis tournament is apparently more important than health policy.

Like paying taxes: Rules are for little people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 06:32:55 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 10, 2022, 06:24:42 AM
And my exposure to the immigration/border control system leads me to believe that individuals, including the person reviewing your passport and travel documents as you enter the country, have wide latitude to interpret rules as they see fit. I remember reading that performances of Taneyev quartets by the Carpe Diem quartet at a music festival in the UK had to be canceled because one of the quartet members had been denied entry at the border. The work permit was denied because the border control agent decided that there were lots of string quartets in the UK who could perform Taneyev and there was no need for foreign labor. There was no international incident in that case.

If the story is true (and I don't question the truth of your having read about it, mind you, just the accuracy of the report) then it's a far graver, revolting and absolutely unacceptable incident than the Djokovic kerfuffle.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 06:40:08 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 10, 2022, 06:24:42 AM
the question of whether a tennis player can flout vaccination rules and enter a country anyway just because his celebrity status is high enough and the tennis tournament is apparently more important than health policy.

Madiel is an Australian lawyer and he explained in detail in a few posts above that actually Djokovic might be at no personal fault, just caught in the middle of a web of miscommunications, misunderstandings and legal inconsistencies between Tennis Australia, the Victorian government and the federal government.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 10, 2022, 07:46:21 AM
Here is an abridged version of the transcripts from when Djokovic was interviewed when he arrived in Australia.  From what I read of it, it wasn't handled well by the border authority.  How was Novak supposed to get ahold of anyone at 4 a.m. (like Tennis Australia or anyone at the Victorian government or his agent?) to see if he could get what they wanted?  I know that they ended up (or were supposed to) extending the deadline to get ahold of further information/documentation to 8:30 a.m.  Curious as to what Madiel makes of this.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/i-don-t-understand-what-djokovic-told-border-force-at-the-airport-20220110-p59n80.html#comments

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 11:28:31 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 06:08:57 AM
I don't think the visa application and granting process is completely automated.

Whereas I wouldn't rule it out.

I don't know. I mean, I've never needed an Australian visa.

But if there's one thing I've felt over many years working for government, it's that not enough resources are put into actually administering laws. Governments of all persuasions seem unaware that administering laws well costs money.

And so departments are constantly looking for ways to administer laws at lower cost. Often this involves making other people, the users of laws, do all the work that the department can't actually afford to do.

I'm not saying what happened in this particular case. I don't know. But the idea of a system where the visa applicant pushes all the buttons and the system spits out an okay that is coded as "well, so far we assume it's okay and 99% of people are okay but when someone actually turns their mind to this individual case things might be different"... I'm not prepared to rule that scenario out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 11:40:59 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 10, 2022, 07:46:21 AM
Here is an abridged version of the transcripts from when Djokovic was interviewed when he arrived in Australia.  From what I read of it, it wasn't handled well by the border authority.  How was Novak supposed to get ahold of anyone at 4 a.m. (like Tennis Australia or anyone at the Victorian government or his agent?) to see if he could get what they wanted?  I know that they ended up (or were supposed to) extending the deadline to get ahold of further information/documentation to 8:30 a.m.  Curious as to what Madiel makes of this.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/i-don-t-understand-what-djokovic-told-border-force-at-the-airport-20220110-p59n80.html#comments

PD

Oh dear.

The really key bit is early on. He believes, wrongly, that when there were 2 medical panels this meant one was Victorian government and one was federal government.

When really one was Tennis Australia and one was Victorian government.

Then later he's switching to saying okay it was Victorian government making decisions. Also not really correct when it comes to the border.

The whole question of timing is an interesting one. On a level of basic principle you are supposed to have an opportunity to be properly heard on decisions that affect you. And that's pretty much why the judge decided the process was flawed.

On the other hand, though, I suspect the  federal government officials didn't see the point. How could Tennis Australia actually fix the problem? They in fact created the problem. All Tennis Australia would do is repeat "we gave him an exemption and got permission from Victoria", and the response would be "so what?".

So he should've been given a better hearing. He wasn't because the officials involved had worked out that further information wasn't going to make a federal medical panel magically spring into existence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 12:01:36 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 10, 2022, 06:30:42 AM
Like paying taxes: Rules are for little people.

It would be more accurate to say that access to lawyers, who can ensure that governments follow rules, is not for little people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 10, 2022, 12:04:17 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 12:01:36 PM
It would be more accurate to say that access to lawyers, who can ensure that governments follow rules, is not for little people.

Accepted as emended.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 10, 2022, 02:14:35 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 11:40:59 AM
Oh dear.

The really key bit is early on. He believes, wrongly, that when there were 2 medical panels this meant one was Victorian government and one was federal government.

When really one was Tennis Australia and one was Victorian government.

Then later he's switching to saying okay it was Victorian government making decisions. Also not really correct when it comes to the border.

On the other hand, though, I suspect the  federal government officials didn't see the point. How could Tennis Australia actually fix the problem? They in fact created the problem. All Tennis Australia would do is repeat "we gave him an exemption and got permission from Victoria", and the response would be "so what?".

So he should've been given a better hearing. He wasn't because the officials involved had worked out that further information wasn't going to make a federal medical panel magically spring into existence.

The two points I've highlighted raise yet another point for me about border controls. To enter Australia, you are checked by ABF as you pass through immigration controls. However, there is now a second 'border' created by State officials and you either get into the state or not dependent on whoever is manning the state border checkpoints (usually state police). My understanding is that those borders can only be enforced by the state government declaring some form of state of emergency (and continually renewing it) which is what has happened thanks to the pandemic. So, in some ways I can see why the Victorian govt has been mentioned. While I can't speak for Victoria I can tell you what happens here in Qld. If you enter from an international destination you will only be allowed to enter if you are entering from:

a safe travel zone country
Have been double vaccinated or a have an exemption
Have had a negative PCR test within 72 hours prior to entry
Have completed a state border pass and this has been ratified by the Qld government

The way I read this - no vax, no entry to QLD. Looking at the Victorian site it appears that you can come in unvaccinated. You will still need a border pass to enter.

So it's easy to see the confusion and it all boils down state control of borders. QLD has followed the Federal government entry guidelines regarding vaccination whereas Victoria clearly has rules of their own. If I threw WA into the mix........nahhhh won't go there. No wonder the situation is so confused.

I mentioned the word 'clusterfuck' in my previous post and this still applies. If the Federal government had grown a set of gonads by overriding state government 'emergency powers' right at the beginning by invoking constitutional powers we would have a one size fits all nationwide. We don't, as state politicians play political games with the federal government and each other. If there has ever been a stronger case for abolishing the state government system surely it is now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 10, 2022, 02:34:44 PM
No argument with any of that, Holden, except that I'm not sure exactly which level of government is more responsible for it being so messy.

The federal government can't simply override anything handled by the States. The constitutional reality is that the powers at the federal level are limited. Sure, in practice they are wide, but in legal terms you have to identify the power you're relying on. I don't see how the federal government could override the States on public health controls.

Many people seem to have been surprised during the pandemic that we actually have State borders. But that's part and parcel of having States. In the 1930s you needed a permit to drive across the border. We're so used to it being completely easy to move around that we've forgotten that it's not inevitable, and that we actually have 8 separate jurisdictions in a federal country.

Meanwhile in the USA you have some States heavily pushing vaccination, and some States making it illegal for a company to require vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 10, 2022, 04:43:17 PM
It's complicated here in Canada as well. The federal gov controls the borders, but health requirements when you land are a provincial jurisdiction - vary from one province to the next. During the 2020 lockdown travel was restricted between some provinces (New Brunswick completely isolated itself, with police control of entry points). There is a federal Health ministry, but its role is mostly about regulating/approving drugs. This week the federal Health Minister strongly hinted at an 'inevitable' mandatory vaccination for all Canadians, but Alberta Premier Jason Kenney said that, no way Jose, it won't happen in his province... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 04:50:44 PM
Quote from: André on January 10, 2022, 04:43:17 PM
This week the federal Health Minister strongly hinted at an 'inevitable' mandatory vaccination for all Canadians, but Alberta Premier Jason Kenney sais that, no way Jose, it won't happen in his province... ::)

I'd like to buy this Jason Kenney guy a beer or two.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/IndolentIncompleteHarlequinbug.webp)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 10, 2022, 05:33:06 PM
Quote from: Florestan on January 10, 2022, 04:50:44 PM
I'd like to buy this Jason Kenney guy a beer or two.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/IndolentIncompleteHarlequinbug.webp)



Digging that emotional buzz, eh?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 10, 2022, 08:09:52 PM
As noted in an earlier post, the Qld government is delaying the start of the school year to try and keep students at home while our omicron goes through its 'projected' peak. This give students an extra two weeks at home on holiday. The weeks missed will be added to the end of the school year. The school (private) that I work at has decided to start with online learning right from the very first day which makes sense to me. As the term was due to start on Jan 24, I can't understand why state schools were not expected to go down this route. There is certainly enough time to prepare.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 11:35:15 PM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 03:32:05 AM
My impression is that Serbian funniness has been deposited temporarily, on some location hidden from the enemies;
(...)

His family associates have a press conference in Serbia, claiming that he was experiencing 'torture' during the events in Australia. When confronted with a critical question (why he played with, and hugged, a group of children just the day after testing corona positive), they stop the interview, rise up, and sing the national anthem ...

It's a region often particularly vulnerable to general paranoic/conspiracy theories; and Serbian government papers now ridiculously claim, that the whole Djokovic business is an Australian revenge against the Serbian nation, because some - partly - Australian company gave up an industrial project in Serbia. The government does its best to harvest on Djokovic's popularity, and they have their reasons, for example due to the often-found, martial victim identity, 10% unemployment, failed corona strategies with the number of fatalities being possibly three times the official one, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 11, 2022, 02:11:08 AM
Now there are questions about whether Djokovic's statement about where he'd been in the 2 weeks before arriving in Australia was false.

Social media posts could come back to bite him on this, giving an entirely new justification for cancelling the visa.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 11, 2022, 03:02:11 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 10, 2022, 11:35:15 PM
His family associates have a press conference in Serbia, claiming that he was experiencing 'torture' during the events in Australia. When confronted with a critical question (why he played with, and hugged, a group of children just the day after testing corona positive), they stop the interview, rise up, and sing the national anthem ...

It's a region often particularly vulnerable to general paranoic/conspiracy theories; and Serbian government papers now ridiculously claim, that the whole Djokovic business is an Australian revenge against the Serbian nation, because some - partly - Australian company gave up an industrial project in Serbia. The government does its best to harvest on Djokovic's popularity, and they have their reasons, for example due to the often-found, martial victim identity, 10% unemployment, failed corona strategies with the number of fatalities being possibly three times the official one, etc.
Yeah, I read (or saw videos) of what his parents were claiming whilst he was waiting for his hearing on Monday.   :( I had brought up earlier about him attending events the day or possibly two after his test and wondered when he received the results of his test.  Do we know why he took the test in the first place?  Was he feeling fine or not?  Had he previously been in contact with someone else who had tested positive?

It just seems crazy!  And I'll leave it at that!

Quote from: Madiel on January 11, 2022, 02:11:08 AM
Now there are questions about whether Djokovic's statement about where he'd been in the 2 weeks before arriving in Australia was false.

Social media posts could come back to bite him on this, giving an entirely new justification for cancelling the visa.
I saw that!  There's apparently a question about (roughly) "Will you be traveling anywhere else during the 14 days prior to coming to Australia" and I read that he had given his agent the authority to reply "No".  But he had gone from Serbia to Spain during this time (according to an article on the BBC's website).  So, I'm confused as to why he answered that way?  Or did he change his mind after applying for his visa and how would this have effected things?

What a mess!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 11, 2022, 04:07:39 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 11, 2022, 03:02:11 AM
Yeah, I read (or saw videos) of what his parents were claiming whilst he was waiting for his hearing on Monday.   :( I had brought up earlier about him attending events the day or possibly two after his test and wondered when he received the results of his test.  Do we know why he took the test in the first place?  Was he feeling fine or not?  Had he previously been in contact with someone else who had tested positive?

It just seems crazy!  And I'll leave it at that!
(...)

PD

I don't follow the details in the story, but the attitude just doesn't sound that likeable to me ... the positive result was given to him the day before the maskless event with children. There's evidence in writing.

I guess the various circumstances will be relatively clear soon, hopefully with good documentation, though there'll probably still be several versions of it, due to all the media/social media fuss.

Apparently he claims the travel questionnaire papers were filled out by the Australian tennis association; but under all circumstances, shouldn't he check them as well?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 11, 2022, 07:27:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 11, 2022, 04:07:39 AM
I don't follow the details in the story, but the attitude just doesn't sound that likeable to me ... the positive result was given to him the day before the maskless event with children. There's evidence in writing.

I guess the various circumstances will be relatively clear soon, hopefully with good documentation, though there'll probably still be several versions of it, due to all the media/social media fuss.

Apparently he claims the travel questionnaire papers were filled out by the Australian tennis association; but under all circumstances, shouldn't he check them as well?
I wish that I knew what the heck was going through his head as I remember the flack that he received after his Adria Tour--and he genuinely seemed to have been remorseful for holding it (plus accompanying close contact sports and clubbing activities).  From what I understand over the years, he's adopted some rather "New Age" and some might say "dubious" beliefs about health/healing/disease/vaccines, etc.   :(  We'll see how it plays out.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 12, 2022, 03:08:32 AM
Models show Omicron cases may peak in Mass. within two weeks, while hospitalizations could continue to surge
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 12, 2022, 03:26:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 12, 2022, 03:08:32 AM
Models show Omicron cases may peak in Mass. within two weeks, while hospitalizations could continue to surge

Omicron is unstoppable, and it seems that vaccination levels are going to make a crucial difference between states in the US and countries in Europe:

we have yet to see its full impact in countries where levels of vaccination uptake are lower, and where we will see more severe disease in the unvaccinated. Taking the example of Denmark, where Omicron cases have exploded in recent weeks, the COVID-19 hospitalization rate for unvaccinated patients was 6-fold higher than for those who were fully vaccinated in the week over Christmas. Data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System shows 96% of pregnant women admitted to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms between May and October 2021 were unvaccinated, a third of whom required respiratory support

https://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/statements/2022/statement-update-on-covid-19-omicron-wave-threatening-to-overcome-health-workforce
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 12, 2022, 05:55:42 AM
Quote from: Que on January 12, 2022, 03:26:49 AM
Omicron is unstoppable, and it seems that vaccination levels are going to make a crucial difference between states in the US and countries in Europe:

we have yet to see its full impact in countries where levels of vaccination uptake are lower, and where we will see more severe disease in the unvaccinated. Taking the example of Denmark, where Omicron cases have exploded in recent weeks, the COVID-19 hospitalization rate for unvaccinated patients was 6-fold higher than for those who were fully vaccinated in the week over Christmas. Data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System shows 96% of pregnant women admitted to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms between May and October 2021 were unvaccinated, a third of whom required respiratory support

https://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/statements/2022/statement-update-on-covid-19-omicron-wave-threatening-to-overcome-health-workforce (https://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/statements/2022/statement-update-on-covid-19-omicron-wave-threatening-to-overcome-health-workforce)


The failure to vaccinate pregnant women, especially, is deplorable (I nearly said criminal)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 12, 2022, 07:33:17 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 12, 2022, 05:55:42 AM
The failure to vaccinate pregnant women, especially, is deplorable (I nearly said criminal)

Absolutely. And in particular the scare mongering that dissuaded them from getting vaccinated...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 12, 2022, 07:42:37 AM
Quote from: Que on January 12, 2022, 07:33:17 AM
Absolutely. And in particular the scare mongering that dissuaded them from getting vaccinated...

In DK, the hospital system has appealed to pregnant women to get vaccinated, since there's been an alarming number of hospitalizations and abortions among unvaccinated contracting Covid.

Source in Danish: https://ugeskriftet.dk/nyhed/fodselslaeger-slar-alarm-vi-ser-flere-dodfodsler-pa-grund-af-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 12, 2022, 07:51:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 12, 2022, 07:38:49 AM
You mean this?

There is limited experience with use of Comirnaty in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate
direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or
post-natal development (see section 5.3). Administration of Comirnaty in pregnancy should only be
considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus


https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf)

Or maybe this?

There is limited experience with use of Spikevax in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate
direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or
post-natal development (see section 5.3). Administration of Spikevax in pregnancy should only be
considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.


https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_en.pdf (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_en.pdf)

Those are disclaimers by the manufacturers that don't tell you much, except they were cautious when they initially released the vaccines. And of course pregnancy is a special situation that required further research on safety. In the summer of last year health authorities across the world cleared the vaccines for safe use during pregnancy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 12, 2022, 08:26:55 AM
A big presser today about loosening of restrictions in DK, and stating that Omicron is significantly milder than Delta, also supported by the local data.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 12, 2022, 08:28:20 AM
The European Union's drug regulator on Tuesday expressed doubts about the need for a fourth booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine and said there is currently no data to support this approach as it seeks more data on the fast-spreading Omicron variant.

"While use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy," the European Medicines Agency's Head of Vaccines Strategy, Marco Cavaleri, told a media briefing.

The EMA official raised concerns that a strategy of giving boosters every four months hypothetically poses the risk of overloading people's immune systems and leading to fatigue in the population.


https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-drug-regulator-says-more-data-needed-impact-omicron-vaccines-2022-01-11/ (https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-drug-regulator-says-more-data-needed-impact-omicron-vaccines-2022-01-11/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 12, 2022, 10:37:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 12, 2022, 08:26:55 AM
A big presser today about loosening of restrictions in DK, and stating that Omicron is significantly milder than Delta, also supported by the local data.



Good. Sounds like you're about over the hump.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 13, 2022, 02:07:12 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 12, 2022, 10:37:47 AM
Good. Sounds like you're about over the hump.

Hopefully not a premature decision, and hopefully what other countries can expect too. Case numbers are still high here, but right now that curve seems to be flattening, and hospitalizations apparently going down (+ a lot of them are related to earlier Delta). Yet there are also some problems with fatalities at the homes for the elderly, sadly. Overall, Omicron produces less severe cases, also due to vaccination rates and people who've already had it. A new American survey, not yet peer-reviewed, says that omicron is only 1/10 fatal, compared to Delta:
https://www.axios.com/cdc-omicron-death-delta-variant-covid-959f1e3a-b09c-4d31-820c-90071f8e7a4f.html

Concerning future vaccinations, there's cooperation between various international organizations as to what types to focus on - likely they'll soon be adjusted to omicron and omicron-deviations. Maybe there'll be 4th or 5ths boost, but it is now suggested here, that from this autumn, vaccines/boosts will mostly be a thing for the relatively fragile members of the society, like with the flu. We'll see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 02:46:37 AM
Here in Australia there are reports that a large proportion of the people recently in intensive care are infected with Delta, not Omicron.

The geniuses in charge, in New South Wales in particular, started opening up when the Delta outbreak was still around.

Locally, the Chief Minister said that modelling is showing we might be near the peak of the Omicron wave (around 1100 cases per day). The number of people in hospital in Canberra has increased, but not as much as feared. Our high vaccination rate is surely helping, and now the number of people who have had a booster shot is also increasing.

The 2 big stories around here at the moment are:

1. It's incredibly difficult for people to actually get tested. Authorities are now officially accepting rapid antigen test results and counting them... but good luck finding rapid antigen test kits if you don't already have them.

2. Food supply chains are badly affected by the number of truck drivers sick or isolating. Panic buying inevitably exacerbates the problem. Supermarket shelves have very noticeable gaps at the moment. There's plenty of food, it's just not getting to the shelves.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 13, 2022, 04:46:55 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 02:46:37 AM
Here in Australia there are reports that a large proportion of the people recently in intensive care are infected with Delta, not Omicron.

The geniuses in charge, in New South Wales in particular, started opening up when the Delta outbreak was still around.

Locally, the Chief Minister said that modelling is showing we might be near the peak of the Omicron wave (around 1100 cases per day). The number of people in hospital in Canberra has increased, but not as much as feared. Our high vaccination rate is surely helping, and now the number of people who have had a booster shot is also increasing.

The 2 big stories around here at the moment are:

1. It's incredibly difficult for people to actually get tested. Authorities are now officially accepting rapid antigen test results and counting them... but good luck finding rapid antigen test kits if you don't already have them.

2. Food supply chains are badly affected by the number of truck drivers sick or isolating. Panic buying inevitably exacerbates the problem. Supermarket shelves have very noticeable gaps at the moment. There's plenty of food, it's just not getting to the shelves.
Last I heard, it's the same here....lack of at home tests and some gaps on the shelves---but not too bad from what I've seen.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 13, 2022, 02:23:04 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 02:46:37 AM
Here in Australia there are reports that a large proportion of the people recently in intensive care are infected with Delta, not Omicron.

The geniuses in charge, in New South Wales in particular, started opening up when the Delta outbreak was still around.

Locally, the Chief Minister said that modelling is showing we might be near the peak of the Omicron wave (around 1100 cases per day). The number of people in hospital in Canberra has increased, but not as much as feared. Our high vaccination rate is surely helping, and now the number of people who have had a booster shot is also increasing.

The 2 big stories around here at the moment are:

1. It's incredibly difficult for people to actually get tested. Authorities are now officially accepting rapid antigen test results and counting them... but good luck finding rapid antigen test kits if you don't already have them.

2. Food supply chains are badly affected by the number of truck drivers sick or isolating. Panic buying inevitably exacerbates the problem. Supermarket shelves have very noticeable gaps at the moment. There's plenty of food, it's just not getting to the shelves.

Queensland's border will be officially ripped down from 1 am on Saturday. No passes or vaccination statements needed, people can cross at will and it will stay that way. Is testing really necessary now that we've let Omicron loose? I think not. Let's look at it logically.

If you are infected but asymptomatic will you know? No. Will you get tested? No, because you have no symptoms.

If you have a bit of a sniffle or similar will you be able to tell if it's Covid? No. Should you isolate for a couple of days - probably. If it's the flu/a cold would you stay at home? That's all down to how you operate. Some will and some won't

Let's go back to 2019. Let's say I have a bad cold. I would probably take a day or so off work and avoid visiting people with young children or elderly relatives. Would I get tested by my GP for a cold or the flu? Probably not as I've been down this road before and I'll simply ride it out. The exception to this is if I felt really sick and that's when I would seek medical advice. So what's different nowadays? Basically nothing except we've blown this whole pandemic idea totally out of proportion. Now that we are seeing upwards of 10,000 cases a day in Qld the whole approach has changed to something far more rational. It's taken us two years to see the obvious.

Some of you will read this and think "No, we needed to act". Before you take this thought any further, consider whether or not you have been conditioned to think this way over the last two years. Hopefully we are now looking forward and moving to take back control of our lives.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 02:32:11 PM
Holden, up until now the death rate has been considerably, considerably higher than the flu.

It hasn't been that high in Australia. But that's a bit like reasoning that the Y2K bug wasn't really a big deal because we successfully prevented it from being a big deal.

The number of deaths is currently going up, lagging behind the increase in the number of cases. This is completely predictable. 29 deaths reported in NSW today. Still tiny by international comparison, but the worst ever for that state. Possibly any Australian state, I'm not sure where Victoria peaked in their first wave.

The goal really is to get this disease to where it's something like the flu. Omicron might in fact get us heading in that direction. But the data is not fully in yet. And while the data is not fully in yet, it pays to err on the side of caution. Because the consequences of being wrong about that are fairly bad.

The line that this is basically like the flu has been trotted out pretty well since this whole thing started. But the data has kept showing that comparison to be flawed. Realistically the goal is to get to the point where the comparison is no longer flawed. Are we there yet? I doubt it.  We might be there in a few more months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 10:23:53 PM
Djokovic's visa has been cancelled. Again.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-14/novak-djokovic-visa-cancellation-decision-immigration-minister/100748386

Bring your popcorn for the next round as he tries to challenge the Minister's personal decision. I doubt it will be simple. I imagine one reason the decision has taken days is to ensure that it's not subject to the sort of procedural challenge that undid the first cancellation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 13, 2022, 11:49:32 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 13, 2022, 10:23:53 PM
Djokovic's visa has been cancelled. Again.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-14/novak-djokovic-visa-cancellation-decision-immigration-minister/100748386

Bring your popcorn for the next round as he tries to challenge the Minister's personal decision. I doubt it will be simple. I imagine one reason the decision has taken days is to ensure that it's not subject to the sort of procedural challenge that undid the first cancellation.
I just read the news about 15 minutes ago after having gone to bed thinking that Minister Hawke wasn't going to do it.  Apparently he made the decision Friday evening (your time)?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 12:18:08 AM
News broke around 6pm our time. So decision would have been a little before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 01:32:08 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 12:18:08 AM
News broke around 6pm our time. So decision would have been a little before.
I found out (after the fact) that the first hearing was broadcast live (though with some difficulties).  Do you happen to know if they are doing something similar now (or will be tomorrow)?  I do see a timeline here:  https://www.theage.com.au

It seems that he is not currently in detention and that the hearing will be tomorrow.

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 01:50:58 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 01:32:08 AM
I found out (after the fact) that the first hearing was broadcast live (though with some difficulties).  Do you happen to know if they are doing something similar now (or will be tomorrow)?  I do see a timeline here:  https://www.theage.com.au

It seems that he is not currently in detention and that the hearing will be tomorrow.

PD

No real idea about broadcast. It's not terribly common here, and it's basically up to the court, but as apparently it's the same judge (at least for the initial directions hearing) then I wouldn't be surprised if it's broadcast again.

I would imagine the judge would at least grant a temporary injunction so that they can't deport Djokovic until the full hearing.  Reporting is also that Djokovic won't be held in detention yet, at least until an interview with immigration officials tomorrow.

Really, none of this should ever have happened. He never should have got a visa in the first place. The fact that he did is almost certainly because it's done through a bunch of automated systems. And on top of that, you apparently have Tennis Australia completely ignoring advice, given in November, that the policy at the border was that a previous infection wasn't grounds to be unvaccinated, regardless of what any medical panel thought.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 01:56:36 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 01:50:58 AM
No real idea about broadcast. It's not terribly common here, and it's basically up to the court, but as apparently it's the same judge (at least for the initial directions hearing) then I wouldn't be surprised if it's broadcast again.

I would imagine the judge would at least grant a temporary injunction so that they can't deport Djokovic until the full hearing.
They are following it here (live), but I don't know which court it is being held at and can't find the live t.v.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/tennis/novak-djokovic-visa-saga-live-updates-immigration-minister-still-yet-to-make-decision-as-serbian-tennis-star-s-2022-australian-open-campaign-remains-in-limbo-20220114-p59o7i.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 01:58:49 AM
Found it!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_-BcBnNeLA
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 02:13:18 AM
I might add I've found one of the documents that Tennis Australia might have relied on.

https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/11/atagi-expanded-guidance-on-temporary-medical-exemptions-for-covid-19-vaccines.pdf

Note that the purpose for this is to do with local immunisation records. And it is guidance. ATAGI is an advisory body, not a lawmaking one.

What it emphatically is not is a statement of border/migration policy. From what I've seen, Tennis Australia was told twice in November what migration policy was.

QuoteThe Health Department issued advice to Australian Open officials on November 18, which in part said:

"ATAGI is not responsible for border control issues, however, the Australian Border Force has advised that people must meet the fully vaccinated definition set by ATAGI to gain quarantine-free entry into Australia."

On seeking further clarification, a letter from Health Minister Greg Hunt to Tennis Australia on November 29 stated: "... the Australian Border Force has advised that people must be fully vaccinated, as defined by the ATAGI, to gain quarantine-free entry into Australia."

Fully vaccinated as defined by the ATAGI - that's basically having had 2 doses. It's got nothing to do with the ATAGI document discussing good reasons to not have or delay vaccination. It's entirely up to the immigration officials the extent to which they adopt that advice, and the policy decision was that when it came to foreigners entering the country, we would tell them they ought to sort that stuff out back home.

Except that isn't what happened. An automated system didn't tell Djokovic, and others, no. But also, Tennis Australia just completely ignored the federal border issue and only talked to the State government (and apparently didn't even tell the State government about the above advice).

Tennis Australia has been lying rather low since Djokovic's arrival in the country, but I honestly think that's the place where heads most need to roll.  Someone was either too legally incompetent to understand what the federal Health Minister told them, or just decided to close their eyes and hope it would be ignored. And maybe it would have been ignored, if one of the highest profile tennis players and certainly the highest profile vaccine skeptic in tennis hadn't made the question of whether he'd be able to play at the Australian Open into a big question, and hadn't generated widespread outrage in Australia when he announced that hey, he was coming after all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 14, 2022, 02:13:34 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 01:50:58 AM
Really, none of this should ever have happened. He never should have got a visa in the first place.

Yes, it would have been much better than all this circus show.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 02:40:40 AM
Yes, it did turn into a huge mess.  Craig Tiley and TA will have a lot of questions to answer.

Looks like Mr. Hawke's basis is that Djokovic's presence in Australia would stoke anti-fax sentiment.

If I'm understanding correctly, the fact that his medical exemption is not for a valid reason can no longer be considered part of the reasoning to deport him as it was already addressed in the previous hearing?  Is that correct Madiel?

And it seems that the government wants to pick up Novak at 8 a.m. to interview him, but his lawyers are arguing that his time would be better served by meeting with his counsel first?  And possible detention, but not tonight?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 03:00:22 AM
Looks like the court reconvened while I was making coffee!  I came in part way (they're taking another but shorter break now)...I did catch that the hearing will now be moved to a Federal court and the lawyers are currently hashing out detention details (or the judge said that he'd do it if they didn't figure out something soon).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 03:00:59 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 02:40:40 AM
If I'm understanding correctly, the fact that his medical exemption is not for a valid reason can no longer be considered part of the reasoning to deport him as it was already addressed in the previous hearing?  Is that correct Madiel?

That's not entirely it. The Minister is using a different cancellation power to the one available to immigration officials, and that different power has different grounds for cancellation.

I won't claim to know all the ins and outs of the Migration Act and Migration Regulations (heaven knows they are insanely long and complex), but there are a number of sections that very explicitly say "this is a power that can only be exercised by the Minister, not delegated to anyone else". And so the Minister isn't trying to redo the same cancellation decision, he's done a different cancellation decision that wasn't available to the officials at the border - and so isn't something that the judge has previously ruled on.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 14, 2022, 03:10:55 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 03:00:59 AM
That's not entirely it. The Minister is using a different cancellation power to the one available to immigration officials, and that different power has different grounds for cancellation.

I won't claim to know all the ins and outs of the Migration Act and Migration Regulations (heaven knows they are insanely long and complex), but there are a number of sections that very explicitly say "this is a power that can only be exercised by the Minister, not delegated to anyone else". And so the Minister isn't trying to redo the same cancellation decision, he's done a different cancellation decision that wasn't available to the officials at the border - and so isn't something that the judge has previously ruled on.
Thanks, I knew that the Minister had special powers and was exercising them.  The reasoning seems rather off to me though....obviously though I don't know all of the options he had to choose from.

As an aside, I read earlier that according to ITF rulebook, if someone withdraws (and I imagine that this applies to only the top seeds?), before I think it was 11 a.m. Saturday, that the open could redo the draw.  Rublev (No. 5) would takeover Djokovic's spot and No. 17, Monfils, would move into Rublev's former spot.  If it's after that time, a lucky loser would take Novak's spot.  At this point, it looks very unlikely that they will be able to redo the draw--unless Novak acquiesces before then.  The hearing is live again.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 14, 2022, 05:55:10 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 14, 2022, 02:13:34 AM
Yes, it would have been much better than all this circus show.

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 14, 2022, 06:04:41 AM
Omicron linked to higher hospitalization rate for babies in UK — 9:38 a.m.
By Bloomberg

Omicron has resulted in a higher hospitalization rate for babies in the U.K. than seen for previous variants of COVID-19, though most hospital stays were short, researchers said.

Infants under the age of one accounted for 42 percent of children hospitalized during the Omicron wave, compared with thirty percent in May to mid-December when the Delta variant was prevalent, the research team said in data presented on Friday. Outcomes for the hospitalized babies have been positive, however, with no deaths, less need for oxygen and proportionally fewer intensive-care admissions than during the Delta wave.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 14, 2022, 06:07:21 AM
Worst COVID outbreak could be nearing its peak in Australia — 12:56 a.m.
By Bloomberg

Australia's most recent COVID-19 wave could peak within weeks, say government officials, potentially easing pressure on crowded hospitals and businesses struggling with supply issues.

The country is experiencing its worst outbreak since the start of the pandemic with more than 100,000 cases being posted daily, fueled by the now dominant omicron strain. The variant makes up about 90% of cases and two-thirds of ICU admissions in its most populous state, New South Wales.

Australia's Chief Health Officer Paul Kelly said he expected to see an easing in new cases as soon as late January or early February, adding that infections in NSW may have already topped out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 03:43:47 PM
Most of the Djokovic action will take until tomorrow, but one thing I noticed is that the Minister specifically referred to Djokovic's disregard for isolating - that whole business with the interview that he did after he knew he was positive (as well as possibly not isolating when waiting for a test result).

That doesn't surprise me. As soon as I saw Djokovic admitting that had happened, I knew it was trouble. I gather it was against the law in Serbia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 14, 2022, 07:28:56 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 03:43:47 PM
Most of the Djokovic action will take until tomorrow, but one thing I noticed is that the Minister specifically referred to Djokovic's disregard for isolating - that whole business with the interview that he did after he knew he was positive (as well as possibly not isolating when waiting for a test result).

That doesn't surprise me. As soon as I saw Djokovic admitting that had happened, I knew it was trouble. I gather it was against the law in Serbia.

It amazes me when I see people express sympathy for him. Entering a foreign country is a privilege and he thinks he should be able to do it without following the rules. All he would have had to do to avoid all of this trouble is to go to his pharmacy and get a vaccine that has literally been administered more than 10 billion times in the past year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 14, 2022, 07:43:20 PM
It's not like any of this BS from Djokovid is a surprise.
Remember the disastrous 2020 Adria tournament he organized?

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/novak-djokovic-coronavirus-positive-test-adria-tour-apology-a9581086.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 09:08:16 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 14, 2022, 07:28:56 PM
It amazes me when I see people express sympathy for him. Entering a foreign country is a privilege and he thinks he should be able to do it without following the rules. All he would have had to do to avoid all of this trouble is to go to his pharmacy and get a vaccine that has literally been administered more than 10 billion times in the past year.

Yes. At least Tennys Sandgren stayed home. Choices and consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 11:03:24 PM
Djokovic's lawyers have apparently updated their arguments to include that it wasn't open to the Minister to conclude that Djokovic had a "well-known stance on vaccination".

Presumably this has something to do with Djokovic, until now, constantly being coy about his vaccination status. But it seems a truly ridiculous argument. There are statements on the public record about him not wanting to get vaccinated. We all know for sure now that he isn't vaccinated, and it was kind of obvious anyway because any vaccinated person would just disclose that to the authorities, at least, and be done with it. If anything, trying to argue this will make their case seem weaker!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2022, 02:28:22 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 03:43:47 PM
Most of the Djokovic action will take until tomorrow, but one thing I noticed is that the Minister specifically referred to Djokovic's disregard for isolating - that whole business with the interview that he did after he knew he was positive (as well as possibly not isolating when waiting for a test result).

That doesn't surprise me. As soon as I saw Djokovic admitting that had happened, I knew it was trouble. I gather it was against the law in Serbia.
Yes, last I heard, his hearing will be starting at 10:15 a.m. Sunday (Australian time) which would be about 6:15 p.m. EST here.  Have you heard anything about whether or not they will live stream it?  I would be rather surprised if they didn't (unless there is some legal rule at the Federal level?) as the Australian authorities have been quite transparent at their end....speaking of which, is their a audio/video recording or a transcript from his Saturday morning (8 a.m.) interview with the immigration authorities?

And, yes, I heard that the Serbian health authorities said that he would have been notified both by text and email within I think that it was something like 20 minutes after the test results had come in after his test...all automated.  I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have at least checked his phone/computer either later that evening/before going to bed/or at least first thing in the morning--before he went anywhere.  Any issues with server problems/email issues around that time....slim chance, but I know that I've had issues where I haven't been able to access my email for a day?  I haven't heard anything about that happening from  him in any event.

Quote from: T. D. on January 14, 2022, 07:43:20 PM
It's not like any of this BS from Djokovid is a surprise.
Remember the disastrous 2020 Adria tournament he organized?

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/novak-djokovic-coronavirus-positive-test-adria-tour-apology-a9581086.html
Yes, I do remember it (and had mentioned it earlier).  I can't read much of your story/link...there's more here:  https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/27/tennis/novak-djokovic-adria-tour-backlash-spt-intl/index.html

Quote from: Madiel on January 14, 2022, 09:08:16 PM
Yes. At least Tennys Sandgren stayed home. Choices and consequences.
Yes, credit to Tennys.

A big question(s) on my mind:  What about the two panels of experts who approved his and the others exemptions?  How much information were they given?

I remember Madiel saying something about rules about Australians traveling within Australia and between the states.  Are the requirements so different for traveling to and entering the state of Victoria?  The federal rules are quite easy to look up.  https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/vaccinated-travellers  Another thought just occurred to me:  I remember reading that one of the things which they were not provided with was where the tennis player was from.  It seems like there should have been something on the application/required proof for a ME stating that this exemption was ONLY VALID for people who were Australians traveling within Australia (and whatever else was applicable) and (in bold print...underlined) something like "and may not be applicable to those needing to comply with federal visa requirements to enter Australia".

PD

EDIT:  Just ran across this on CNN:  It looks like the case will be held by a Full Court and will be held remotely.  Time is now set for 9:30 a.m. (Sunday) with 5:30 p.m. EST.  Don't know whether or not we will be able to view it or not.

From CNN:  Djokovic case to be heard in front of full bench in Federal Court
From CNN's Hannah Ritchie in Melbourne
World men's tennis No.1 Novak Djokovic's visa cancellation case will be heard by a Full Court in the Federal Court of Australia.

A full court refers to cases where three or more judges sit together in the Federal Court to hear an appeal.

"This matter will be heard by a Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia comprised of Chief Justice James Allsop, Justice Anthony Besanko and Justice David O'Callaghan," the court said Saturday.

The remote hearing is scheduled to take place at 9.30 a.m. Melbourne time Sunday (5.30 p.m. ET Saturday).

Both sides in the case will file their online submissions to the court by 10 p.m. Saturday (6 a.m. ET).

This post has been updated to correct the time in the US that both sides will file their online submissions to the court. They will do so at 6 a.m. ET."

If I'm recalling correctly the lawyers for Australia, did not want a full bench?

And also from CNN:  It looks like Novak is back at the Park Hotel.  I would have thought that they would have allowed him to stay somewhere (like a private home which I believe that he was staying at earlier--don't know whether or not it had a tennis court as he was practicing I believe on the AO courts?) where he and his team could work on his training/fitness.  It's not like he's a flight risk.

"Djokovic returned to Park Hotel detention facility as protesters gather to demand his release
From CNN's David Tunnicliffe and Hannah Ritchie in Melbourne, Australia
Protesters demonstrate outside Melbourne Park after Novak Djokovic returned to an immigration detention hotel in Melbourne on Saturday.
Protesters demonstrate outside Melbourne Park after Novak Djokovic returned to an immigration detention hotel in Melbourne on Saturday. (Mark Baker/AP)
Novak Djokovic has returned to the Park Hotel detention facility in Melbourne, according to CNN affiliate Nine News.

The men's world No. 1 was seen in a white van arriving at the hotel, which is also being used as a detention facility for refugees, after he departed his lawyers' office on Saturday afternoon.

On Saturday morning, Djokovic was detained by Australian border authorities, per a court-ordered arrangement decided Friday, after his visa was revoked for the second time by Australia's immigration minister, Alex Hawke.

He was once again placed in pre-immigration detention, as required under Australian law.

A range of protesters have gathered outside the Park Hotel. Some supporting Djokovic and calling for his release, others speaking out against Australia's detention system.

During his first round of detention in the hotel, Djokovic had requested to be moved to a "more suitable place of detention that would enable him to train," according to court documents published January 8.

Djokovic's appeal hearing for the second cancellation of his visa is expected to take place on Sunday morning at 9:30 am Australia time, CNN affiliate Nine News reported, citing one of the tennis star's lawyers, Paul Holdenson."

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 15, 2022, 03:49:36 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2022, 02:28:22 AM
A big question(s) on my mind:  What about the two panels of experts who approved his and the others exemptions?  How much information were they given?

We know the Tennis Australia panel and the Victorian government panel were not given identifying information about players etc. seeking exemptions. That probably means not knowing what country they were from... except surely it was pretty well all on the basis that we were talking about international people, not Australians.

Quote
Are the requirements so different for traveling to and entering the state of Victoria?

At times, particularly when covid was present in some states and not others, the rules in each state have been very different. They are still very different for entering Western Australia, where the cases per day are still in the single digits.

There have been all sorts of dramas about this issue over the course of the pandemic. For example, I live in the Australian Capital Territory which is completely surrounded by New South Wales. There was a situation where NSW abruptly changed the rules, and a whole group of ACT residents couldn't drive from Victoria into NSW despite having completed all the necessary paperwork that was valid only hours before.  The ACT government actually had to negotiate, over a couple of days while these people lived out of their cars at the border, an arrangement where they could transit across NSW so long as they didn't stop before arriving in the ACT.

Just before Christmas there was a big fight because Queensland required a negative PCR test result for entry, even after covid had already taken hold there, and several other states said that a huge proportion of the big testing queues was due to people who didn't have any other reason to get tested besides wanting to go to Queensland for summer holidays.

I think even now different states have different rules about whether you have to quarantine, how long for, whether you can do it at a private home, and whether you'll have to pay for doing it at a hotel.  As my immediate family is all nearby I have just resolved to completely forget about travelling until it stops being so messy. I've crossed the ACT/NSW border once in the last 2 years.

Quote
If I'm recalling correctly the lawyers for Australia, did not want a full bench?

Yes I think you're correct. Going straight to a full bench is fairly unusual. But I think the court, quite reasonably, took the view that it would be stupid to have a single judge decision that might be immediately appealed to a full bench. Given the timeframes, it would be dumb to not resolve this at the first opportunity.

QuoteAnd also from CNN:  It looks like Novak is back at the Park Hotel.  I would have thought that they would have allowed him to stay somewhere (like a private home which I believe that he was staying at earlier--don't know whether or not it had a tennis court as he was practicing I believe on the AO courts?) where he and his team could work on his training/fitness.  It's not like he's a flight risk.

Yeah, I'm really not sure how this whole detention arrangement came about. What the point was of giving him Friday night but then saying he had to be detained Saturday. I do think detention is generally required under the law, but then I don't get why he could stay free on Friday night.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2022, 08:18:00 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 15, 2022, 03:49:36 AM
We know the Tennis Australia panel and the Victorian government panel were not given identifying information about players etc. seeking exemptions. That probably means not knowing what country they were from... except surely it was pretty well all on the basis that we were talking about international people, not Australians.

At times, particularly when covid was present in some states and not others, the rules in each state have been very different. They are still very different for entering Western Australia, where the cases per day are still in the single digits.

There have been all sorts of dramas about this issue over the course of the pandemic. For example, I live in the Australian Capital Territory which is completely surrounded by New South Wales. There was a situation where NSW abruptly changed the rules, and a whole group of ACT residents couldn't drive from Victoria into NSW despite having completed all the necessary paperwork that was valid only hours before.  The ACT government actually had to negotiate, over a couple of days while these people lived out of their cars at the border, an arrangement where they could transit across NSW so long as they didn't stop before arriving in the ACT.

Just before Christmas there was a big fight because Queensland required a negative PCR test result for entry, even after covid had already taken hold there, and several other states said that a huge proportion of the big testing queues was due to people who didn't have any other reason to get tested besides wanting to go to Queensland for summer holidays.

I think even now different states have different rules about whether you have to quarantine, how long for, whether you can do it at a private home, and whether you'll have to pay for doing it at a hotel.  As my immediate family is all nearby I have just resolved to completely forget about travelling until it stops being so messy. I've crossed the ACT/NSW border once in the last 2 years.

Yes I think you're correct. Going straight to a full bench is fairly unusual. But I think the court, quite reasonably, took the view that it would be stupid to have a single judge decision that might be immediately appealed to a full bench. Given the timeframes, it would be dumb to not resolve this at the first opportunity.

Yeah, I'm really not sure how this whole detention arrangement came about. What the point was of giving him Friday night but then saying he had to be detained Saturday. I do think detention is generally required under the law, but then I don't get why he could stay free on Friday night.
Thank you for sharing your own stories and for the further information.

I haven't heard of any Aussie players not wanting to get vaccinated, but if not, wouldn't they also have needed one of those MEs to play?  Just tossing it out there as a theoretical.  I know that Tsitsipas (from Greece) was reluctant for quite some time to get vaccinated; at one point, the Greek government was pleading with him to basically tone down his comments afraid that his popularity would discourage other Greeks from getting vaccinated.  But he did it.

In any event, I stumbled across this article which I thought it would be fair to share to provide some balance to the arguments that Novak is an "anti-vaxer".  The gentleman writing it was the head honcho at the Australian Open for a number of years.  His name:  Paul McNamee.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/tennis/djokovic-an-easy-target-in-anti-vaxxer-witch-hunt-20220115-p59ogt.html

Quite interesting that he set up and paid for free vaccine clinics and donations to hospitals, etc.  I would think that his lawyers would bring those things up in their arguments?

Any recent reports of any protests by Serbians and other fans of Novak's...either in Australia or in Serbia?

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 15, 2022, 01:11:39 PM
No idea to be honest what would've happened with any Australian player. Depends what the rules are right now.

But yeah, they wouldn't have a visa issue.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2022, 01:22:01 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 15, 2022, 01:11:39 PM
No idea to be honest what would've happened with any Australian player. Depends what the rules are right now.

But yeah, they wouldn't have a visa issue.  :laugh:

Very true!  ;)

Have you heard anything about them live-streaming the hearing?  It's supposed to start in 10 minutes.

Looking again at The Age website, it looks like Serbia is looking at possible consequence scenarios if he's deported.

PD

EDIT:  Looks like they will be streaming it here....though, so far anyway (even though it says that it started streaming live about 10 minutes ago), there's nothing there.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRxyGJGi6OE

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 15, 2022, 01:31:45 PM
It's on now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 15, 2022, 03:12:42 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 14, 2022, 07:28:56 PM
It amazes me when I see people express sympathy for him. Entering a foreign country is a privilege and he thinks he should be able to do it without following the rules. All he would have had to do to avoid all of this trouble is to go to his pharmacy and get a vaccine that has literally been administered more than 10 billion times in the past year.


As Madiel said, he shouldn't have gotten a visa in the first place.

Often some athletes and celebrities do weird things partly due to a sense of invincibility/privilege combined with a lack of education and a lack of ability to understand the circumstances. I think the guy is technically a high school graduate, but he didn't attend the school much.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 15, 2022, 09:59:04 PM
Djokovic's application has been dismissed. The Minister's decision to cancel his visa stands.

In theory he could try to appeal to the High Court. In practice I think the High Court would not give leave to appeal because there's no general principle involved, it's just an individual case.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on January 15, 2022, 10:10:23 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 14, 2022, 07:28:56 PM
It amazes me when I see people express sympathy for him. Entering a foreign country is a privilege and he thinks he should be able to do it without following the rules. All he would have had to do to avoid all of this trouble is to go to his pharmacy and get a vaccine that has literally been administered more than 10 billion times in the past year.
+1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 16, 2022, 04:31:46 AM
I watched some of the hearing last night (was up too early and I ended up dozing off partway through as much as I wanted to see it 'til the end).

There's so much that needs explaining from this whole mess...at least from what I've learned/heard so far reading and watching videos and events unfold.  In the end, though, he's out of the open and out of Australia.

And, yes, it's a privilege--not a right--to be able to enter another country.

And Salvatore Caruso is one "lucky loser"!  Google "lucky loser" and tennis events if you don't know what that means.

And the Australian Open will go on; one player is not bigger than the whole sport nor the events (as Rafa said in so many words).  Will be interesting to see whether Craig Tiley is still in charge of it next year and what kind of shakeup comes out of this re Tennis Australia, etc. too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 05:16:02 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 16, 2022, 04:31:46 AM
And the Australian Open will go on; one player is not bigger than the whole sport nor the events (as Rafa said in so many words). 

Why, of course he said that, after all he has much more chances of winning now that Djokovic is out. I think his comments were totally unsportsmanship )is that a word?)

Although not the first instance of politics impacting on sport, the whole mess was a pathetic circus show. I think this year tournament's reputation has been greatly damaged.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 16, 2022, 08:37:00 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 05:16:02 AM
Why, of course he said that, after all he has much more chances of winning now that Djokovic is out. I think his comments were totally unsportsmanship )is that a word?)

Unsportsmanlike.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:06:31 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 05:16:02 AM
Why, of course he said that, after all he has much more chances of winning now that Djokovic is out. I think his comments were totally unsportsmanship )is that a word?)



Nadal's statement in question could be taken out of context (by media or you). Nadal said "If he's playing, finally, OK. If he's not playing, the Australian Open will be a great Australian Open, with or without him."

Also he said the followings.

"I respect him as a person. Of course, a lot as an athlete. Even if I don't agree with his way to thinking about how to proceed with this pandemic."  "I really believe in vaccination...and when you make your decisions then there is some consequences...We did a lot of things together. I think positive things for our sport and I wish him well."

"What we are facing worldwide is much, much more important than tennis and tennis players...millions of people have already passed away and a lot of families are suffering the consequences of this terrible (pandemic) almost two years."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 16, 2022, 09:09:38 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:06:31 AM
"What we are facing worldwide is much, much more important than tennis and tennis players...millions of people have already passed away and a lot of families are suffering the consequences of this terrible (pandemic) almost two years."

Alas! All too true. Reminds me of a post-9/11 Onion headline: Americans want to care about stupid shit again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:10:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 16, 2022, 09:09:38 AM
Alas! All too true.

The guy is an intelligent guy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:12:10 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 16, 2022, 09:09:38 AM
Alas! All too true. Reminds me of a post-9/11 Onion headline: Americans want to care about stupid shit again.

;D :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 11:00:49 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:06:31 AM

Nadal's statement in question could be taken out of context (by media or you).

I hadn't read the whole thing and commented only on the part referred to by PD. My bad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 16, 2022, 12:23:59 PM
Quote from: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 05:16:02 AM
Why, of course he said that, after all he has much more chances of winning now that Djokovic is out.

A number of other people said it as well. Including tournament organisers.

The fact is Djokovic should never have been in the country. And the end result for the tournament would be exactly the same, only no-one would be reporting much on Djokovic's absence.

Give it a few good matches and they won't be reporting on it much again.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 16, 2022, 01:28:48 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 16, 2022, 12:23:59 PM
A number of other people said it as well. Including tournament organisers.

The fact is Djokovic should never have been in the country. And the end result for the tournament would be exactly the same, only no-one would be reporting much on Djokovic's absence.

Give it a few good matches and they won't be reporting on it much again.

Of course - storm in a tea cup stuff.

IMO the right decision was made even if it was possibly for the wrong reasons. One thing that made me laugh was the some of the comments made by the Serbian President, Aleksander Vucic:

"Anyway, it [would have been] very easy for the Australian authorities to say from the very beginning that OK, only vaccinated, only inoculated people could enter Australian territory, but they didn't say so."

Mate, do you know how to read? This has always been clear!

"What is not fair play is the political witch hunt, by everybody including the Australian Prime Minister, pretending that the rules apply to all,"

In Serbia they may not (and Vucic's reputation in this regard is interesting) but we Australians certainly think that they should. We don't care if you are Joe Bloggs from Outer Whipsnade or an international 'star' - them's the rules and they apply to everybody. Johnny Depp found this out the hard way!

I wonder if the Serbian President is related to Trump?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 16, 2022, 01:45:43 PM
Quote from: Holden on January 16, 2022, 01:28:48 PM
"Anyway, it [would have been] very easy for the Australian authorities to say from the very beginning that OK, only vaccinated, only inoculated people could enter Australian territory, but they didn't say so."

Mate, do you know how to read? This has always been clear!

Apparently it wasn't clear to Tennis Australia for one thing.

Nor does it seem to have been clear to border officials, for the first few people who came in with bad Tennis Australia-issued "exemptions", that this was not okay.

So while there's certainly an argument that the policy was always the policy, I do think there are real questions about the failings in actually implementing that policy. The failings that led to Djokovic ever thinking he should get on a plane to Australia, and the failings that led other people to enter Australia on the same basis that Djokovic was trying to.

It's not hard to accuse Australia of inconsistency here and construct a narrative where Djokovic was targeted. I mean, I generally suspect that isn't a correct narrative, and the real story is one of us not running our systems properly coupled with Tennis Australia being hopeless, and possibly it took Djokovic's exceptionally high profile to notice that we'd mucked it up for some time before his arrival.  But it's not as if you have to be a conspiracy nut to notice that Djokovic seems to be the only person heading to the Australian Open who was stopped at the border, and he was not the only person heading to the Australian Open who was unvaccinated.

There's a basic principle that I learned from Yes, Minister and which is fairly widely known in Canberra: if you have to choose between a conspiracy and a stuff-up, it's far more likely to have been a stuff-up. But as we keep saying it wasn't a conspiracy, I don't think it's okay to just quietly sweep the stuff-up under the carpet. Questions should definitely be asked about how it ever came to this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 01:37:21 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 16, 2022, 01:45:43 PM
Djokovic seems to be the only person heading to the Australian Open who was stopped at the border

That's technically true but actually he's not the only one to have their visa cancelled and get deported.

'I felt like a criminal': Renata Voracova on being kicked out of Australia (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jan/13/renata-voracova-on-being-kicked-out-of-australia-tennis)

    Tennis player says she was made to undress during questioning
    WTA offers backing to Czech player it says did 'nothing wrong'

The Czech doubles player Renata Voracova, who was deported from Australia after her visa was cancelled, has spoken of how she "felt like a criminal" and was made to undress by the Australia Border Force during questioning.

Voracova had initially been allowed to enter Australia on a medical exemption granted after she had an adverse reaction to a Covid infection and even played in a tournament in Melbourne.

However, in the fallout from the cancellation of Novak Djokovic's visa on the basis of a similar exemption, Voracova was ordered to leave the country and was deported on Saturday.

Voracova, who has said she hopes Tennis Australia does the right thing so she is not forced to sue for compensation, told BBC News Russian: "I felt a little bit like a criminal, but there was no reason why I should feel like that. I sent all the documents. They were approved. If I knew there would be even a 1% chance of something not being right, I wouldn't go."

The 38-year-old, who has won 11 WTA doubles titles and reached the semi-finals of the women's doubles at Wimbledon in 2017, still intends to get vaccinated against Covid-19 in the future and said that she had suffered medical complications after contracting the virus that prevented her getting the jab before the Australian Open.

She told the Russian publication Denik of being made to undress during her detention and interrogation by immigration officials before leaving Australia.

"I was worried. I didn't feel safe until I was back home, nothing was certain," she said. "It was as if I were watching a film – a long interrogation with instructions such as 'undress, get dressed'. Yuck, I don't even want to think about it, let alone live it again."


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:17:12 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 01:37:21 AM
That's technically true but actually he's not the only one to have their visa cancelled and get deported.

Yes I know. But that's exactly the point. She got through. Why?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 02:22:41 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:17:12 AM
Yes I know. But that's exactly the point. She got through. Why?

I suppose because the border police inspected her documents and found them to be okay --- which begs the question: why was she eventually deported?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:42:28 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 02:22:41 AM
I suppose because the border police inspected her documents and found them to be okay --- which begs the question: why was she eventually deported?

Because her documents had exactly the same flaw as Djokovic's. This is my point. She had exactly the same ground for exemption; the same flawed ground.

I don't know exactly what the Tennis Australia document said. And that's one of the things that would be interesting to know. It didn't raise an alarm bell for a low profile player who wasn't known for funny views on vaccines (in fact she doesn't have funny views on vaccines, her reason for not being vaccinated was from circumstances rather than views).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 03:01:44 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:42:28 AM
Because her documents had exactly the same flaw as Djokovic's. This is my point. She had exactly the same ground for exemption; the same flawed ground.

In which case the border police officer(s) who allowed her to enter Australia should be sanctioned for not fulfilling their duty. If those dealing with Djokovic stopped him at the border, so should have done those dealing with Voracova.

Quote from: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:42:28 AM
I don't know exactly what the Tennis Australia document said. And that's one of the things that would be interesting to know. It didn't raise an alarm bell for a low profile player who wasn't known for funny views on vaccines (in fact she doesn't have funny views on vaccines, her reason for not being vaccinated was from circumstances rather than views).

So, if Djokovic would not have come to Australia, Voracova would have played in the tournament alright without anyone noticing her documents were flawed. Which seems to underscore the point of those who claim that Djokovic was deported not because of his documents but because of his views on vaccination.

Anyway, I'm kind of fed up with this mess which could have been easily avoided.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 04:20:44 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 05:16:02 AM
Why, of course he said that, after all he has much more chances of winning now that Djokovic is out. I think his comments were totally unsportsmanship )is that a word?)

Although not the first instance of politics impacting on sport, the whole mess was a pathetic circus show. I think this year tournament's reputation has been greatly damaged.
Re Rafa:  I could see how you could view it that way--if it was all that he had said over the course of Novak's visa woes--but it wasn't.

Here is an article which quotes an interview that he did for I believe a Spanish radio station when Novak had his visa reinstated:  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10386299/Novak-Djokovic-Rafael-Nadal-labels-Serbs-visa-row-CIRCUS.html

and from another interview (I think that this was after the first time that it was revoked):  https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/06/tennis/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-australian-open-spt-intl/index.html

And here's part of a live interview referring to my earlier comment re the sport vs. specific players:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaQVo1P5bk4

Anyway, there are other interviews with him.  You can do the digging around though; I'm just in from an hour and a half of shoveling...breakfast time.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 07:35:05 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 16, 2022, 09:06:31 AM

Nadal's statement in question could be taken out of context (by media or you). Nadal said "If he's playing, finally, OK. If he's not playing, the Australian Open will be a great Australian Open, with or without him."

Also he said the followings.

"I respect him as a person. Of course, a lot as an athlete. Even if I don't agree with his way to thinking about how to proceed with this pandemic."  "I really believe in vaccination...and when you make your decisions then there is some consequences...We did a lot of things together. I think positive things for our sport and I wish him well."

"What we are facing worldwide is much, much more important than tennis and tennis players...millions of people have already passed away and a lot of families are suffering the consequences of this terrible (pandemic) almost two years."
Ah, I had missed the following page when I went to reply to Florestan's comments.  Thank you for adding in the above.  And, yes, I also think that Rafa's very intelligent too.  By the way, and I believe that it was also part of your first quotation paragraph, he also had mentioned that they had worked with/helped each *others(?) charities [and ones in general in which tennis players played to raise money for charities].

*Which has been common particularly among the top players
Quote from: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:42:28 AM
Because her documents had exactly the same flaw as Djokovic's. This is my point. She had exactly the same ground for exemption; the same flawed ground.

I don't know exactly what the Tennis Australia document said. And that's one of the things that would be interesting to know. It didn't raise an alarm bell for a low profile player who wasn't known for funny views on vaccines (in fact she doesn't have funny views on vaccines, her reason for not being vaccinated was from circumstances rather than views).
I was shocked and horrified that she was made to undress!  What the h**l for?!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 07:47:14 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 04:20:44 AM
Re Rafa:  I could see how you could view it that way--if it was all that he had said over the course of Novak's visa woes--but it wasn't.

Here is an article which quotes an interview that he did for I believe a Spanish radio station when Novak had his visa reinstated:  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10386299/Novak-Djokovic-Rafael-Nadal-labels-Serbs-visa-row-CIRCUS.html

and from another interview (I think that this was after the first time that it was revoked):  https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/06/tennis/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-australian-open-spt-intl/index.html

And here's part of a live interview referring to my earlier comment re the sport vs. specific players:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaQVo1P5bk4

Anyway, there are other interviews with him.  You can do the digging around though; I'm just in from an hour and a half of shoveling...breakfast time.  :)

PD

See my reply #6765.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 08:11:06 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 07:47:14 AM
See my reply #6765.
And see my comment in 6775...specifically "Ah, I had missed the following page when I went to reply to Florestan's comments."   ;)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 08:15:10 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 08:11:06 AM
And see my comment in 6775...specifically "Ah, I had missed the following page when I went to reply to Florestan's comments."   ;)

PD

:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 17, 2022, 10:14:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 16, 2022, 11:00:49 AM
I hadn't read the whole thing and commented only on the part referred to by PD. My bad.

Not an issue. Have a great week and enjoy beer, Andrei!

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 17, 2022, 07:35:05 AM
Ah, I had missed the following page when I went to reply to Florestan's comments.  Thank you for adding in the above.  And, yes, I also think that Rafa's very intelligent too.  By the way, and I believe that it was also part of your first quotation paragraph, he also had mentioned that they had worked with/helped each *others(?) charities [and ones in general in which tennis players played to raise money for charities].

*Which has been common particularly among the top playersI was shocked and horrified that she was made to undress!  What the h**l for?!

PD

Yes, the way he chose things he would say and things he wouldn't say evinces his intelligence and decency.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 17, 2022, 11:12:06 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 17, 2022, 10:14:51 AM
Not an issue. Have a great week and enjoy beer, Andrei!

Thanks, you too. I don't drink beer during winter, though, only wine and occasionally a shot or two of strong drink.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 17, 2022, 01:06:34 PM
Ex. Post. News

1. No Vaccine No French Open. No exemption.

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/no-vaccine-no-french-open-djokovic-says-french-sports-ministry-2022-01-17/

2. Djokovic's sponsor Lacoste (and possibly other sponsors) plans to examine the Australian event.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/17/business/novak-djokovic-lacoste-australia/index.html


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 17, 2022, 01:22:08 PM
When being unvaccinated means being locked out of public life

By Chico Harlan and Stefano Pitrelli
Today at 9:37 a.m. EST

OSIGO, Italy — After many rounds of rules targeting the unvaccinated, the chamber musician's new life is unrecognizable from the old. Claudio Ronco once performed all over Europe, but now he can't even board a plane. He can't check into a hotel, eat at restaurant or get a coffee at a bar. Most important, he can't use the water taxis needed to get around Venice, his home for 30 years — a loss of mobility that recently prompted him to gather up two of his prized cellos, lock up his Venetian apartment and retreat with his wife to a home owned by his in-laws one hour away in the hills.

"Isolation," Ronco called it, on the fourth day in a row that he hadn't left the house.

At this complicated stage of the pandemic, the lives of unvaccinated people are in major flux, at the mercy of decisions made everywhere from courts to workplaces. But their lives are changing most dramatically in a handful of countries in Western Europe, including Italy, where governments are systematically reducing their liberties, while beginning to return the rest of society to a state of normalcy. And while regular testing, until recently, was permitted as an alternative to vaccination, even that option has now been largely removed as countries harden their mandates. For people like Ronco, the choice is to get inoculated or face exclusion.

Ronco, 66, knows some people who have relented, including a fellow musician with three kids and a mortgage. He knows others who are scrambling for hard-to-get medical exemptions. But Ronco — an Orthodox Jew and a specialist in 18th-century music who tends to distrust the trends of the masses — figures this is an instance when he can try to withstand the mounting pressure. His savings are thinning, but not gone. His children are grown. His wife, Emanuela Vozza, a fellow cellist, also unvaccinated, feels as he does. So day after day, his resistance has continued: A musician who once played at Milan's famed La Scala has been instead working alongside Vozza, editing recordings they've made in their countryside living room, unable for the foreseeable future to perform for a crowd.

"Even in a public square, it would be impossible," he said, because he and the audience would still need the Green Pass, the European digital vaccination card.

He gestured at the forest beyond his in-laws' home. He has found himself in recent days dreaming of putting on a concert in a clearing in the woods.

"I could put out a call on Facebook and hope nobody comes to break it up," Ronco said.

Some of the unvaccinated people Ronco knows keep a low profile. Ronco understands why: Their decisions have been criticized vehemently by politicians, by virologists, even by Pope Francis. Days ago, Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi said the unvaccinated are responsible for "most of the problems we have today," disproportionately occupying intensive care beds.

"We're flat-earthers," Ronco said, describing the view of people like himself that has taken hold. "With total disrespect for the system and humanity itself."

But Ronco says leaders are overlooking how their moves are cleaving society into two groups, one accepted and one not. As Italy, over months, built up its Green Pass rules — first for indoor dining, then for workplaces, then for public transit and much more — Ronco turned his Facebook page into a mix of Torah passages, cello movements and fiery claims about government overreach. He re-shared the testimony of various vaccine skeptics and in the process lost roughly 1,500 of his 5,000 followers, only to find new friend requests pouring in — presumably from people who were more like-minded.

Most of that churn didn't matter to him. But one consequence struck a painful chord. He'd been close friends with an expert Italian stringmaker — "we were like brothers," Ronco said. When Ronco visited the string factory several months ago, his friend had enforced masking and distancing and temperature checks. But the visit, Ronco felt, had been warm.

Then, a few days ago, the stringmaker unfriended Ronco on social media.

To Ronco, it was one more form of isolation setting in.

"This is somebody I've known for 30 years," he said quietly. "There is no bridge from one side to the other."

Green Pass is seen as oppressive to some, freeing for others

More than an hour away, in Ronco's old Venetian neighborhood, the little local bars were filled with people drinking cheap cocktails and snacking on cicchetti — all after showing the Green Pass. This is the city where Ronco raised two children from an earlier marriage. It is the city that came to feel like home, far more than even Turin, where he grew up. But on this evening, Ronco's apartment was dark, and the lights were coming instead from a 16th-century rowhouse belonging to his neighbor, Claudio Ambrosini, vaccinated three times.

Ambrosini, a composer of contemporary music, said he considers Ronco a "courageous" musician, creative and willing to buck trends. In past years, Ronco played the cello at Ambrosini's dinner parties. But when they last saw one another, on the street in Venice, Ambrosini asked Ronco whether he'd finally gotten vaccinated — and was disappointed with the response. Ambrosini told Ronco he was making the wrong choice.

For Ambrosini, 73, the decision about vaccination is clear-cut. He spent the pandemic's first year scared of getting severely sick, while planning for concerts only to see them canceled. Vaccination brought personal relief. But he also sees getting inoculated as part of the social contract. He says the new Green Pass rules are benevolent, not dystopian. The rules have helped to convince some holdouts, and are among the factors in Italy's vaccination rate being one of the highest in Europe.

Ambrosini is required to present his Green Pass to take the four-hour train ride to Rome for concerts. He uses the pass three times a week to enter an indoor swimming pool. He doesn't yet feel completely secure; he still wears a double mask. But the Green Pass has made his life in Venice tenable.

In his neighborhood, the rosy brick buildings have endured for centuries, and at night, the reflections of those buildings ripple in the water, ever changing. Ambrosini said the contrasts of the environment — hard and soft, permanent and fleeting — have seeped into his music. He said he considers Venice the ideal city for a musician.

The sun was setting, and Ambrosini craned his neck for a look outside, toward the canal and a nearby wooden bridge.

"Claudio's apartment is just over that way," the composer said. "You can practically see it from here."

Why remain unvaccinated?

Ronco is an irrepressible storyteller, folding history and religion into even the most direct questions. Asked what year his cello was built, he first answered succinctly: "1745." But the story was only beginning. He described the heyday of string instrument craftsmanship in 18th-century Italy. He described how the instrument made its way from one country and the next, until it was apprehended by Nazi soldiers and transported to the Auschwitz concentration camp, where Jewish prisoners were forced to perform. He described how it was repaired after wartime damage and how, even after he obtained it, he briefly felt uncertain about conjuring the sounds of a haunted place.

When he finished his account, he took out his bow. Soon, in the empty living room, Ronco's right arm was dancing, and rosin dust floated through the sunlight.

So began the fifth consecutive day in which he didn't leave the house.

Faced with the direct question of why he is unvaccinated, Ronco again has stories — many of them. Over hours, he talked about potential medical consequences of the jab and alternative methods for boosting the immune system. He touted Vladimir Zelenko, a New York doctor tending to a Hasidic Jewish community, who became world famous for devising an experimental treatment that included hydroxychloroquine. He raged about the new divisions in society and even invoked the Nazi-era Aryan passport document.

But Ronco also made it clear that his resistance comes naturally. It fits with the story he's set for his own life: as an unconventional performer.

As a teenager, he paused his studies at Turin's elite music conservatory, moved to India and spent several years living with a teacher who taught him the sitar and non-Western music. He applied his against-the-grain philosophies not just in music, but in health. After a pair of 2007 heart attacks, he said, doctors recommended a daily regimen of 19 pills that he'd need to take for the rest of his life. But Ronco said he "rebelled" and stopped with the pills cold turkey, even fearful that the decision might kill him. Instead, his body regained its equilibrium.

"They wanted me to be on a bench for the rest of my life feeding pigeons," Ronco said. "I wasn't ready for that."

"It can't go on like this," Ronco said after he finished playing, where Vozza had joined in.

"[The government] is pushing so hard on us," Vozza said. "We committed no crime. But we are not free — not completely free."

The constraints are about to get even tighter. In coming weeks, Italy will also mandate its Green Pass at banks, stores and the post office, where Ronco and Vozza sometimes send their CDs to fans. (In those places — unlike restaurants, bars and transit — Italy will still accept a negative test.) Starting in mid-February, Italy will also impose a 100-euro fine on anybody older than 50 who isn't vaccinated. Ronco said he'll pay.

There's a chance, Ronco surmised, that the Italian coronavirus rules are fleeting: that the virus becomes accepted as endemic and the Green Pass rules are reeled back in. But he isn't sure. The virus keeps changing. The state of emergency keeps getting extended. He and his wife could be holed up for months, or years. Recently, Ronco started thinking about the possibility of moving elsewhere — to a country that didn't have rules for the unvaccinated.

It was just a down-the-road possibility, Ronco said.

But if it happened, he could already picture the first leg: They'd have to leave Italy by car.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:53:08 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 17, 2022, 01:22:08 PM
alternative methods for boosting the immune system.

At this point I sighed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 17, 2022, 06:15:33 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 17, 2022, 02:53:08 PM
At this point I sighed.

Oh, I know, I know ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 01:58:07 AM
What amazes and saddens me is that some people --- I'm not reffering to anyone here --- not only do not oppose such draconian, absurd and inhumane restrictions, but on the contrary relish them and are only too eager to see them implemented in their own country in case they are not in place already.

With each passing day I'm more and more convinced that Romania is one of the freest countries in the EU. Not that there are no restrictions at all, but to be forced out of work and confined to virtual house arrest because unvaccinated is unthinkable here, now and in any foreseeable future.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:05:29 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 17, 2022, 01:06:34 PM
Ex. Post. News

1. No Vaccine No French Open. No exemption.

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/no-vaccine-no-french-open-djokovic-says-french-sports-ministry-2022-01-17/

2. Djokovic's sponsor Lacoste (and possibly other sponsors) plans to examine the Australian event.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/17/business/novak-djokovic-lacoste-australia/index.html
*I heard yesterday about changes in rules in France and how that would effect the French Open.  Hadn't heard about the sponsors though, but it makes sense.  They obviously would have concerns whether or not he'll be playing again and probably also where (like Lacoste and the French Open--that would be a huge one for him to miss in their eyes).

Well, Novak will have to make some very important decisions and very soon if he wants to continue playing tennis.

*I had a discussion with a friend of mine the other day and I mentioned that the other opens and important tennis tournaments (at the least) would certainly be examining their rules and making changes if need be as in absolutely no ambiguity/loopholes for getting admitted into the tournament and making sure that all would be communicated CLEARLY to all parties involved.  They absolutely do NOT want a repeat of what happened in Australia!  He heartily agreed saying that "They would be idiots if they didn't".  I suspect that (at least in current circumstances) it will be a case of needing to be double-vaccinated and needing to provide proof of that.  Boosters required?  I haven't heard anything about those yet.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:07:43 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 01:58:07 AM
What amazes and saddens me is that some people --- I'm not reffering to anyone here --- not only do not oppose such draconian, absurd and inhumane restrictions, but on the contrary relish them and are only too eager to see them implemented in their own country in case they are not in place already.

With each passing day I'm more and more convinced that Romania is one of the freest countries in the EU. Not that there are no restrictions at all, but to be forced out of work and confined to virtual house arrest because unvaccinated is unthinkable here, now and in any foreseeable future.
What sort of restrictions are there currently in Romania?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 18, 2022, 02:26:43 AM
Apparently, there's no central website about the various restrictions and entry requirements in different countries, as opposed to the degree of how corona has struck in them (as regards the official stats). It would be convenient to have such a restrictions source, but also require a good deal of daily maintenance.

https://romaniatourism.com/travel-advisory.html says

"To reduce the impacts of COVID-19 on the health care system, stop the spread, and increase vaccination rates, the following rules / public health restrictions will be in effect, until February 8, 2022:

* Locals and visitors must wear a mask when in all indoor spaces as well as in outdoor spaces, where physical distancing - at least 10 ft. - is not possible
(public transport stations, open-air markets, open-air concerts/ events)
* An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to access all public institutions and non-essential stores/ shopping malls/ performing arts centres.
Access to pharmacies and food stores (except those located in shopping malls) does not require a proof of vaccination/ recent Covid recovery.

* Restaurants and entertainment/ recreation facilities will operate at limited capacity and, only between the hours of 5 a.m. and 10 p.m., as follows:
~ Restaurants and coffee shops - 30% capacity, for indoor and outdoor dining.
~ Performing arts centres/ movie theatres, fitness facilities and playgrounds - 30% capacity.
Bars and clubs must stay closed, until further notice.

An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to check-in in hotels/ B&Bs or to have meals in restaurants.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:35:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:07:43 AM
What sort of restrictions are there currently in Romania?

PD

Covid Pass (vaccination, recovery, negative test) for bars, restaurant, caffes, theaters, cinemas, museums, malls and some other places, including some government bulidings.

Mask mandate outdoor (more or less complied with and enforced) and indoor public places (enforced).

No Covid Pass whatsoever for going to work, food & beverage stores, small non-food stores, pharmacies, banks, post offices. No Covid Pass whatsoever for using domestic public transportation (I'm not sure about planes).

Schools are open and will remain so. Some universities were mandating Covid Pass for attending but their mandate was overturned by several courts of law*.

In short, that Italian cellist could keep living his usual life, apart from some minor inconveniences. He could even keep his friends, because the social divide between vaccinated and unvaccinated is negligible. I personally know, or heard of, no vaccinated people who broke with their unvaccinated friends, including at direct meeting level.

* btw, there is no legal background for imposing and enforcing even those restrictions because the so-called "state of alarm" which the government declared since autumn 2020 and on the basis of which they were adopted was declared unconstitutional and illegal by several courts of law too. The govenment's appeal is pending and will probably be heard ad calendas graecas.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:41:43 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 18, 2022, 02:26:43 AM
* An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to access all public institutions and non-essential stores

No longer in force, there are now several exemptions for public institutions. Plus, most non-essential stores, especially in small cities and rural areas, while advertising on the front door that you need a Covid Pass to enter, will never ask you for one.

Quote
An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to check-in in hotels/ B&Bs

Yes, I forgot about hotels.

All in all, if you consider both the relatively mild restrictions and their lax enforcement, life for most unvaccinated people in Romania is business as usual save minor inconveniences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:44:26 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 18, 2022, 02:26:43 AM
Apparently, there's no central website about the various restrictions and entry requirements in different countries, as opposed to the degree of how corona has struck in them (as regards the official stats). It would be convenient to have such a restrictions source, but also require a good deal of daily maintenance.

https://romaniatourism.com/travel-advisory.html says

"To reduce the impacts of COVID-19 on the health care system, stop the spread, and increase vaccination rates, the following rules / public health restrictions will be in effect, until February 8, 2022:

* Locals and visitors must wear a mask when in all indoor spaces as well as in outdoor spaces, where physical distancing - at least 10 ft. - is not possible
(public transport stations, open-air markets, open-air concerts/ events)
* An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to access all public institutions and non-essential stores/ shopping malls/ performing arts centres.
Access to pharmacies and food stores (except those located in shopping malls) does not require a proof of vaccination/ recent Covid recovery.

* Restaurants and entertainment/ recreation facilities will operate at limited capacity and, only between the hours of 5 a.m. and 10 p.m., as follows:
~ Restaurants and coffee shops - 30% capacity, for indoor and outdoor dining.
~ Performing arts centres/ movie theatres, fitness facilities and playgrounds - 30% capacity.
Bars and clubs must stay closed, until further notice.

An EU covid digital certificate or proof of Covid infection in the past 180 days or a negative Covid test is needed to check-in in hotels/ B&Bs or to have meals in restaurants.

Interesting, so you could have had a very mild case of Covid  and be unvaccinated and still be able to do a lot of things?  It doesn't say though how far in advance one needs to get tested too.  In any event, thanks for the info!

And yes, a central world database would be lovely, but imagine the logistics?  And what if it were hacked too?  And, as Madiel had mentioned previously, In Australia (for example), there are differences between the states in terms of rules too.

Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:41:43 AM
No longer in force, there are now several exemptions for public institutions. Plus, most non-essential stores, especially in small cities and rural areas, while advertising on the front door that you need a Covid Pass to enter, will never ask you for one.

Yes, I forgot about hotels.

All in all, if you consider both the relatively mild restrictions and their lax enforcement, life for most unvaccinated people in Romania is business as usual save minor inconveniences.
Ah, we were both typing at the same time!  Thanks for the further info Andrei.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 18, 2022, 02:47:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:35:30 AM
* btw, there is no legal background for imposing and enforcing even those restrictions because the so-called "state of alarm" which the government declared since autumn 2020 and on the basis of which they were adopted was declared unconstitutional and illegal by several courts of law too. The govenment's appeal is pending and will probably be heard ad calendas graecas.

Yes, well, if you have a decision that restrictions can't be legally enforced, that does rather discourage the imposition of legal restrictions.

As far as I'm aware every single legal challenge to government restrictions here in Australia has failed. The only successful challenged I'm aware of have been to company-imposed requirements, for example on the basis that the company didn't consult properly as required by a workplace agreement.

Certain politicians appear to have been rather surprised by the width of powers under legislation that parliaments had previously passed. At the federal level, the legislation was only revamped in 2015. It seems clear now that various people didn't pay attention to the laws that they were passing, probably because they didn't turn their mind to them ever being used in this sort of context (as opposed to, say, the kind of quarantine that we routinely apply to goods to maintain our agricultural sector).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:51:18 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:44:26 AM
Interesting, so you could have had a very mild case of Covid  and be unvaccinated and still be able to do a lot of things?

Yes, that';s true. I actually am sure that the number of people who recovered from Covid, is far larger than the official figure, precisely because they had (very) mild cases and didn't care to get tested and registered.

QuoteIt doesn't say though how far in advance one needs to get tested too. 

I think the term is 72 hours prior to entrance in the location, but I'm not sure.


QuoteAh, we were both typing at the same time!  Thanks for the further info Andrei.

PD

You're welcome, PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 18, 2022, 02:52:56 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 18, 2022, 02:44:26 AM
(...)

And yes, a central world database would be lovely, but imagine the logistics?  And what if it were hacked too?  And, as Madiel had mentioned previously, In Australia (for example), there are differences between the states in terms of rules too.
(...)

PD

Indeed, nonetheless the worldwide corona databases have overall been impressively managed. But of course, it's easier to sectionize simple numbers, rather than restrictions. The generated website traffic might produce some modest profits, but people would probably often also double-check with local, official pages as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 03:00:20 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 18, 2022, 02:47:14 AM
Yes, well, if you have a decision that restrictions can't be legally enforced, that does rather discourage the imposition of legal restrictions.

Well, very many people have been fined since 2020 for not complying with various restrictions but each and every one of those people who challenged them in courts won: all their fines were cancelled.

Plus, there are restrictions that are simply unenforceable, for instance mandating that people wear only FFP2 or surgical masks. This one in particular resulted in an uproar from the very police trade unions which announced they are not qualified to know the difference between the various types of masks and there is no intention on their part to take off people's masks in order to assess their compliance with the regulation. Therefore they will fine nobody. Nevertheless, some fines were applied but there's no doubt they will be cancelled in court if challenged.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 03:10:14 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:35:30 AM
Covid Pass (vaccination, recovery, negative test) for bars, restaurant, caffes, theaters, cinemas, museums, malls and some other places, including some government bulidings.

Mask mandate outdoor (more or less complied with and enforced) and indoor public places (enforced).

No Covid Pass whatsoever for going to work, food & beverage stores, small non-food stores, pharmacies, banks, post offices. No Covid Pass whatsoever for using domestic public transportation (I'm not sure about planes).

Schools are open and will remain so. Some universities were mandating Covid Pass for attending but their mandate was overturned by several courts of law*.

In short, that Italian cellist could keep living his usual life, apart from some minor inconveniences. He could even keep his friends, because the social divide between vaccinated and unvaccinated is negligible. I personally know, or heard of, no vaccinated people who broke with their unvaccinated friends, including at direct meeting level.

* btw, there is no legal background for imposing and enforcing even those restrictions because the so-called "state of alarm" which the government declared since autumn 2020 and on the basis of which they were adopted was declared unconstitutional and illegal by several courts of law too. The govenment's appeal is pending and will probably be heard ad calendas graecas.

Sounds draconian to me! Come to Great Britain Little England.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 03:15:55 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 03:10:14 AM
Sounds draconian to me! Come to Great Britain Little England.

Tell us more, please. What restrictions, if any, are there?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 03:18:22 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 03:15:55 AM
Tell us more, please. What restrictions, if any, are there?

Masks in school, on public transport and public indoor venues, other than hospitality. Work at home if you can. We all expect these will be ditched on 26 January.

The thing to add about the context is that we had an excellent level of 2x vaccinated and a good level of 3x vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 18, 2022, 03:26:35 AM
Well, with England you're talking about a country where the plan at the start of the pandemic was to just let things rip and reach herd immunity... until people started pointing out just how many deaths that would involve and how herd immunity really requires vaccines to be achievable anyway...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 03:31:06 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 03:18:22 AM
Masks in school,

Same here, I forgot about that.

QuoteWork at home if you can.

Same here, widely used.

QuoteThe thing to add about the context is that we had an excellent level of 2x vaccinated and a good level of 3x vaccinated.

Well, we have an excellent level of natural immunity, estimated at 70 % by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. And it shows: while infections are increasing, although not at the rate predicted by the usual prophets of doom&gloom, the number of hospitalizations and deaths remains low, much lower than in the previous wave.

In other news, one of my best friends and his four children of various ages, all unvaccinated including my friend, just recovered from Covid. They had only mild, very mild or no symptoms at all. He is glad that now he can have his Covid Pass on recovery grounds, while his wife is very upset: she tested negative so she can't get one.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 04:29:47 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 18, 2022, 03:26:35 AM
Well, with England you're talking about a country where the plan at the start of the pandemic was to just let things rip and reach herd immunity... until people started pointing out just how many deaths that would involve and how herd immunity really requires vaccines to be achievable anyway...

In my beginning is my end.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 18, 2022, 06:04:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 02:35:30 AM


Mask mandate outdoor

This is the one which, for me, is hard to make any sense of.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 09:19:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 01:58:07 AM
What amazes and saddens me is that some people --- I'm not reffering to anyone here --- not only do not oppose such draconian, absurd and inhumane restrictions, but on the contrary relish them and are only too eager to see them implemented in their own country in case they are not in place already.

With each passing day I'm more and more convinced that Romania is one of the freest countries in the EU. Not that there are no restrictions at all, but to be forced out of work and confined to virtual house arrest because unvaccinated is unthinkable here, now and in any foreseeable future.

There is always a tradeoff between individual freedom and collective/societal benefit. Which factor you evaluate higher just depends on your ideology. Certainly some factory owners may argue that their factories should have freedom to burn anything they like, pollute air, and throw waste. Some municipalities impose a huge fine, which you may call draconian, on littering, thereby limiting people's "freedom" to throw garbage.

A relevant concept here is "externality (or collective action problem)." A free choice by a few people may hamper freedom of a larger number of people. When you throw garbages, urinate on street, or play music loud, that will have an adversarial effect on others- often other's freedom.  Also, when your country is building an air defense system against a possible Russian attack, you cannot ask for a system excluding you. It would be either collective defense for all the people or no defense at all (non-excludability).

As for the evaluation of individual freedom vs. collective/societal benefit during the pandemic, one must consider the number of death on the one hand and the real benefit of refraining from vaccination for these unvaccinated people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 09:32:49 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 09:19:45 AM
There is always a tradeoff between individual freedom and collective/societal benefit. Which factor you evaluate higher just depends on your ideology. Certainly some factory owners may argue that their factories should have freedom to burn anything they like, pollute air, and throw waste. Some municipalities impose a huge fine, which you may call draconian, on littering, thereby limiting people's "freedom" to throw garbage.

A relevant concept here is "externality (or collective action problem)." A free choice by a few people may hamper freedom of a larger number of people. When you throw garbages, urinate on street, or play music loud, that will have an adversarial effect on others- often other's freedom.  Also, when your country is building an air defense system against a possible Russian attack, you cannot ask for a system excluding you. It would be either collective defense for all the people or no defense at all (non-excludability).

With all due respect, Manabu, your analogies for refusing vaccination are wildly far-fetched.

Let's just agree to disagree and leave it at that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 10:41:20 AM
Mayor Wu says 1,000 more city employees vaccinated within a week as vaccine mandate went into effect

By Tiana Woodard and Sahar Fatima Globe Staff, Updated January 18, 2022, 10:22 a.m.

Boston has seen a jump of more than 1,000 vaccinated employees since last Monday as Mayor Michelle Wu launched a vaccine mandate on Saturday, she announced Tuesday.

As of this morning, 17,861 city employees are in full compliance with the city's vaccination policies, she said.

"Proof of vaccination for the safety of our workforce and our residents makes a big difference in boosting our rates across the city, which still remains the most powerful tool that we have to keep everyone safe in this pandemic," Wu said.

With Boston now also requiring proof of vaccination in many public spaces, including restaurants, 81 percent of Bostonians have now received at least one dose, which is a 36 percent increase from the week before, said Dr. Bisola Ojikutu, executive director of the Boston Public Health Commission.

"I'm cautiously optimistic," Ojikutu said, adding that Boston's positivity rate is now at 26.5 percent, down from 32 percent last week. Hospitalizations, however, are climbing: adult hospitalizations were up 35 percent and pediatric hospitalizations up 56 percent compared to last week, she said.

Wu and Ojikutu were speaking at a press conference to open the first of three new high-capacity testing sites in Boston on Tuesday in an effort to improve access, particularly in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color.

The Bruce C. Bolling Building in Roxbury will offer free, walk-in testing from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday, the public health commission said in a statement Monday evening, with results usually within 24 hours. Cambridge-based CIC Health will offer the testing services, which will involve self-administered PCR tests.

Two additional sites will open soon as well, Ojikutu said: Lilla G. Frederick Pilot Middle School in Dorchester will open for testing at the end of this week to run from Fridays through Sundays, and the Jubilee Christian Church in Mattapan will open next week and run Tuesdays through Thursdays, 12 p.m. to 7 p.m.

"I'm so excited at the potential for this to be one more way to cut down the lines that we've been seeing across the city," Wu said.

The Bolling Building site will have room for 20 people to be tested at once, and room for 50 to wait in line indoors.

Anyone who arrives to line up after those 50 people will be given a ticket on which they can write in a time to return that works best for them, Rodrigo Martinez, chief marketing and experience officer at CIC health, said at the press conference.

Ojikutu said the site will be able to test 1,000 people per day.

"We know that COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted people of color and exacerbated existing barriers to care. So we're really proud to open this site in the heart of Boston's Black and African American community," she said.

Free walk-in testing is also currently available at the Anna M. Cole Community Center in Jamaica Plain and at the West End House in Allston.

Advocates and public health specialists say long wait times, a lack of reliable transportation, jobs with little flexibility, and language barriers make it tougher for people to get tested in low-income, immigrant, and BIPOC communities.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, people in those communities got sick at higher rates because of their exposure at work, in public transportation, and in accessing food than people in wealthier, whiter neighborhoods. State data shows that pattern appears to be continuing with the surge of Omicron. Many of Boston's neighborhoods with large numbers of people of color have reported higher positivity rates than other neighborhoods.

Wu also announced that her administration will ask City Council to replenish Boston's small business relief fund with $5 million of America Rescue Plan funding to support 300 additional small businesses. The city will also be providing technical support for those applying and participating in the program.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 11:07:27 AM
'This is a different phase.' It may be time for a reset on kids, school, and COVID

By Kara Miller Globe Correspondent, Updated January 18, 2022, 1 hour ago

Sometimes you can feel an inflection point.

We're seeing it in waste water, where, in the Boston area, evidence of COVID-19 has been plummeting for about a week.

That already seems to be reflected in moderating case numbers. And, soon, we may start to witness a radical shift in how we think about COVID and school.

Such a shift would impact a core part of society, one that has been a lightning rod for the last two years. And it may set the stage for a new chapter in the pandemic.

Sometimes you can feel an inflection point.

We're seeing it in waste water, where, in the Boston area, evidence of COVID-19 has been plummeting for about a week.

That already seems to be reflected in moderating case numbers. And, soon, we may start to witness a radical shift in how we think about COVID and school.

Such a shift would impact a core part of society, one that has been a lightning rod for the last two years. And it may set the stage for a new chapter in the pandemic.

David Rubin, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — one of the largest children's hospitals in the country — insists: Not only do we need to keep schools open, but our entire approach to kids has to change.

David Rubin, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — one of the largest children's hospitals in the country — insists: Not only do we need to keep schools open, but our entire approach to kids has to change.

David Rubin, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — one of the largest children's hospitals in the country — insists: Not only do we need to keep schools open, but our entire approach to kids has to change.

If the exposure comes from home (where people spend more of their time, and are more likely to spread the virus), "mask to stay" should be allowed only if the individual in question is vaccinated. That person could also be included in a smaller, more targeted test-to-stay program.

Rubin knows these proposals are unusual, at least for this moment. And for some, they'll feel scary.

But, he says, we have hit that all-important inflection point. And if nothing changes about the labyrinth of policies we currently rely on, he's worried about the road we're headed down.

"Kids were asked to shoulder a lot of the burden last year in a collective community response to COVID. Now the issues around prolonging social isolation or continuing to deny access to in-person education are so far greater than the risk of the virus itself. Not just to the children but to their families themselves, particularly now that people can get vaccinated."

Since 2022 began, some large districts — like Chicago, Milwaukee, and Atlanta — have closed or gone remote for at least a few days. Even in towns and cities that stayed open, many students and teachers have missed lots of school due to quarantines.

Testing — which is often hard to get — has seemed key to keeping schools open.

And, Rubin says, it has been. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) runs a large testing program and advocated for test-to-stay policies early on. But in a fast-moving pandemic, such programs may become less and less important.

"When everyone's exposed," Rubin told me, "what does it mean to test everyone every week? This is a different phase."

In the last few days, in fact, we've seen the entire state of Vermont make the shift away from routine, asymptomatic testing, instead allowing parents to do rapid testing at home, when it makes sense.

"Many of the strategies that previously were effective for us will cease to be useful (if they haven't already)," wrote Vermont Secretary of Education Dan French, "and will instead become a drain on scarce resources without a clear public health benefit."

Dr. Benjamin Lee, a pediatrician at the Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, warns that we need a new way of thinking about the pandemic.

"I do think it makes sense to understand that ... the days of relying on a centralized top-down response may no longer be the best approach going forward," he told Vermont Public Radio.

Governor Charlie Baker may be edging towards this view as well, announcing on Tuesday that Massachusetts schools can now adopt at-home rapid testing, as an alternative to the more formal "test and stay."

Delaware County, just outside Philadelphia, has formally embraced CHOP's recommendations, including allowing asymptomatic students and staff to stay in school, if their exposure to COVID comes from a non-household member.

Rubin says that CHOP's test-to-stay program taught him that "even though we got a lot of schools to do it, and we trained a lot of people to do it, a lot of schools couldn't do it. Particularly under-resourced schools could not pull it off in a way that maybe other schools that had more resources could.

"So you started to create a system of the haves and the have-nots. And so you had some schools where kids were quarantined for 10, 14 days. And other schools that were getting their kids back in five days." He said those disparities started to weigh on him.

And it's important to acknowledge, he says, what is lost when kids quarantine.

There was a mental health crisis among kids before the pandemic, but now hospitals are increasingly seeing the effects of isolation and distancing.

As the CDC has made clear, ER visits for suicide attempts among young people (particularly girls) skyrocketed during the pandemic. And this fall, the American Academy of Pediatrics declared a "national emergency" due to "soaring rates of mental health challenges" since the spring of 2020.

As a parent of young children who has been following local, state, and school coronavirus guidelines with a fervor that I generally reserve for returns on election night, it's hard to imagine us ever getting out of this thicket of regulations, testing, and quarantines.

Can you really keep schools running when kids and teachers are exposed, but not routinely tested, as Rubin would have it?

Yes, he says. Because there are risks on both sides of the ledger.

"We're actually seeing the patients. We're seeing the spectrum of illness firsthand. And we're also seeing the competing risks in our patients. And it's time for someone with that level of authority that's unconflicted, that's not a health department, that's not the CDC, to say: From our vantage point, the calculus now has changed."

He says that, judging from what he sees in the hospital, COVID is now acting more like "a seasonal virus, with regards to the spectrum of disease," and it's not going away anytime soon. Along with other respiratory viruses, it will simply continue to circulate.

I asked Rubin about teachers who might be worried about walking into a school in which asymptomatic kids are "masking to stay."

"Welcome to all of our world over the last couple of weeks," he says. "I hear what you're saying, but we have folks — restaurant workers, health care workers — who face that every day. And it's not just from their patients — it's from their colleagues. And that's the world of Omicron.

"I would remind them that it's the vaccination and the boosters, when they're eligible, that are protective," he says. "And in a typical flu season, no one would wear masks. You're probably at a higher risk in that season of getting the flu. And flu can have particularly severe consequences. But for vaccinated individuals, boosted individuals, the risk is far lower."

He says that for some very high-risk teachers, accommodations could be made on an individual basis.

Also, if a student or teacher has a health condition, they may want to continue to test frequently. "Let's make that more of a voluntary or optional program, and we should provide the access to those individuals who do need to know."

The transition back to normal, he says, also will eventually mean that kids take off their masks. (In December, as the Omicron wave was rising, he and his colleagues at CHOP "implored the schools" to keep masks on, but cases will soon start to fall.)

"I think most schools look at declining transmission and declining hospitalization," Rubin says. "And so we're helping schools try to identify when that moment is, because everyone is doing it a little differently. But I think by February, we're going to start to see a lot of schools moving to mask-optional postures."

Rubin acknowledges that he is advocating an unorthodox strategy, especially during the upheaval of Omicron, but he feels compelled to do it. "It's counterintuitive a little bit because of the phase of the pandemic that we're at, and that we hear about in the news every day. But it is truly a different moment."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 11:35:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 09:32:49 AM
With all due respect, Manabu, your analogies for refusing vaccination are wildly far-fetched.

Let's just agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Sounds good, Andrei. Thank you for reading my post, and again, enjoy your wine and a few strong shots!  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 18, 2022, 11:35:51 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/supreme-court-gorsuch-refused-to-wear-mask-despite-sotomayors-covid-concerns.html

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has refused to wear a mask during proceedings, despite a request from Chief Justice John Roberts to do so, according to a report.
Gorsuch's continued defiance has led Justice Sonia Sotomayor — who has diabetes and is therefore at a higher risk of serious illness from Covid — to attend oral arguments remotely, the report said.
Roberts "in some form" asked the justices to wear masks, NPR reported. Gorsuch, a nominee of former President Donald Trump, was reportedly the only one to refuse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 11:38:07 AM
Quote from: T. D. on January 18, 2022, 11:35:51 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/supreme-court-gorsuch-refused-to-wear-mask-despite-sotomayors-covid-concerns.html

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has refused to wear a mask during proceedings, despite a request from Chief Justice John Roberts to do so, according to a report.
Gorsuch's continued defiance has led Justice Sonia Sotomayor — who has diabetes and is therefore at a higher risk of serious illness from Covid — to attend oral arguments remotely, the report said.
Roberts "in some form" asked the justices to wear masks, NPR reported. Gorsuch, a nominee of former President Donald Trump, was reportedly the only one to refuse.


Very interesting news in many, differential aspects/issues. Thank you for the info.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 18, 2022, 11:38:32 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 11:35:41 AM
Sounds good, Andrei. Thank you for reading my post, and again, enjoy your wine and a few strong shots!  ;D ;D

I always read your posts with interest. Cheers!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 11:42:12 AM
Quote from: T. D. on January 18, 2022, 11:35:51 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/supreme-court-gorsuch-refused-to-wear-mask-despite-sotomayors-covid-concerns.html

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has refused to wear a mask during proceedings, despite a request from Chief Justice John Roberts to do so, according to a report.
Gorsuch's continued defiance has led Justice Sonia Sotomayor — who has diabetes and is therefore at a higher risk of serious illness from Covid — to attend oral arguments remotely, the report said.
Roberts "in some form" asked the justices to wear masks, NPR reported. Gorsuch, a nominee of former President Donald Trump, was reportedly the only one to refuse.

One can be on the SCOTUS and still be a performative asshole, I perceive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 11:43:34 AM
Omicron forces more cruise lines to cancel trips

In recent weeks, hundreds of passengers have contracted the coronavirus onboard ships, with many falling ill and spending days in quarantine.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 11:48:10 AM
Meanwhile, in Trumplandia:

Detainees sue Arkansas jail that gave them ivermectin to treat COVID

Detainees at an Arkansas jail who had COVID-19 were unknowingly treated by the detention center's doctor with ivermectin, a drug that health officials have continually said is dangerous and should not be used to treat or prevent a coronavirus infection, according to a federal lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of four detainees.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 11:49:31 AM
Fourth Pfizer dose is insufficient to ward off Omicron, Israeli trial suggests
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 18, 2022, 11:42:12 AM
One can be on the SCOTUS and still be a performative asshole, I perceive.

I thought that there are many issues in the incident. A few things I can think of now include:

1) the anti-vaccination and anti-mask theory could be legally and ideologically supported and legitimized by several, or even a majority, of Justices in the top body of judicial branch.

2) the power of Chief Justice over other Justices in this (procedural) circumstance is unclear and un-agreed upon. This disagreement could be exacerbated by the disagreement over 1).

3) I thought, and still think, that Alito and Thomas can be worse assholes.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 02:14:32 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
I thought that there are many issues in the incident. A few things I can think of now include:

1) the anti-vaccination and anti-mask theory could be legally and ideologically supported and legitimized by several, or even a majority, of Justices in the top body of judicial branch.

2) the power of Chief Justice over other Justices in this (procedural) circumstance is unclear and un-agreed upon. This disagreement could be exacerbated by the disagreement over 1).

3) I thought, and still think, that Alito and Thomas can be worse assholes.  ;D

All points well taken.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 18, 2022, 04:17:10 PM
Omicron hasn't peaked in U.S., surgeon general says, warning that 'next few weeks will be tough'
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 18, 2022, 07:46:12 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 18, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
1) the anti-vaccination and anti-mask theory could be legally and ideologically supported and legitimized by several, or even a majority, of Justices in the top body of judicial branch.

Yes, with their abundance of epidemiological qualifications.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 19, 2022, 02:13:46 AM
It is a little odd that Denmark is still growing in cases and hospital admissions when they started same time as UK and are more boosted as well...


https://twitter.com/chrischirp/status/1483752123775041540
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 19, 2022, 02:41:35 AM
I don't really know why, but testing in DK is still 200,000 - 250,000 PCRs + 200,000 quick tests, totally about 7-8% of the population per day, catching a lot of cases. The share of patients hospitalized with other diseases and a 'secondary', less important omicron is going up everywhere, it's at least 27% here. ICU corona numbers are dropping quite a lot, in spite of the many identified cases (33,000 yesterday) and hospitals say that they are less strained. A lot of the ICUs tend to be 'old' Delta cases. So the talk here in DK is about loosening restrictions further; but some people are warning against too much haste. The earlier guarantee of 30 days maximum for treatment of any disease has now also been re-introduced, due to less strain on the system, but it's going to take time to implement.


EDIT: and 38,800 today ... but hospitalizations still not on the level of the 2020-2021 winter, people are there for a shorter time, and ICUs about 1/3 of that winter.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 19, 2022, 03:13:59 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 19, 2022, 02:13:46 AM
It is a little odd that Denmark is still growing in cases and hospital admissions when they started same time as UK and are more boosted as well...

https://twitter.com/chrischirp/status/1483752123775041540

Just a hunch: more testing and less prior infections?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 03:43:40 AM
News from Israel

Finance minister calls for cancellation of COVID vaccine 'Green Pass' (https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/finance-minister-calls-for-cancellation-of-covid-vaccine-green-pass/)

Finance Minister Avigdor Liberman calls for an end to the widespread usage of the "Green Pass" proof of COVID vaccination to enter certain locations.

"There is no medical or epidemiological logic in the Green Pass, many experts agree," says Liberman. "There is, however, direct harm to the economy, to daily operations and a not insignificant contribution to daily panic among the public."

Liberman says he is working with "all the authorities" in order to get rid of the Green Pass and "maintain a normal life routine for all of us."

Currently, admittance to many public and private facilities requires a Green Pass vaccination card, which is only valid following a booster shot or within six months of a second vaccine dose.

Initial data shows that the current widespread Omicron variant is able to bypass the vaccine in many cases.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 19, 2022, 04:07:09 AM
Some recent news re China:

"About 2000 hamsters will be killed after traces of COVID-19 were found on 11 linked to the Little Boss pet shop. Hong Kong authorities claim the imported hamsters could have led to the infection of two employees of the store. All the other animals in the shop will also be euthanised as a precaution."

Article from The Age (Australia):  https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/pets-the-latest-sacrifice-in-china-s-attempt-to-hold-fortress-covid-zero-20220119-p59pg2.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 19, 2022, 04:21:32 AM
News from the Doom & Gloom Department:

WHO says omicron won't be last Covid variant as global cases surge by 20% in a week (https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/who-says-omicron-wont-be-last-covid-variant-as-global-cases-surge-by-20percent-in-a-week.html)

Dr. Bruce Aylward, a senior WHO official, warned high levels of transmission give the virus more opportunity to replicate and mutate, raising the risk that a new variant will emerge.


Buckle up for another ride in the coming year...

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 04:23:43 AM
Quote from: Que on January 19, 2022, 04:21:32 AM
News from the Doom & Gloom Department:

WHO says omicron won't be last Covid variant as global cases surge by 20% in a week (https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/who-says-omicron-wont-be-last-covid-variant-as-global-cases-surge-by-20percent-in-a-week.html)

Buckle up for another ride in the coming year...

In the last two years WHO made lots of contradictory statements from the very beginning. They have zero credibility in my book.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 19, 2022, 04:31:15 AM
Apparently at least 12 European nations reporting record-breaking numbers of infections today

(Denmark, Croatia, Switzerland, Slovenia, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Germany, Italy, France).

https://twitter.com/TWMCLtd/status/1483789813396516868
https://twitter.com/TWMCLtd
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 19, 2022, 04:32:43 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 04:23:43 AM
In the last two years WHO made lots of contradictory statements from the very beginning. They have zero credibility in my book.

I think another real risk now is "Covid fatigue", which will lead to dismissing caution and ignoring bad news. There seems already be a downturn in the number of people that follow the rules and turn up for another shot.

Worst case scenario would be if a new variant strikes when most have decided that they dont give a sh%t anymore.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 06:04:17 AM
Quote from: Que on January 19, 2022, 04:32:43 AM
I think another real risk now is "Covid fatigue", which will lead to dismissing caution and ignoring bad news. There seems already be a downturn in the number of people that follow the rules and turn up for another shot.

Worst case scenario would be if a new variant strikes when most have decided that they dont give a sh%t anymore.

Well, the world can't live the remainder of the century from lockdown to lockdown and from booster to booster. You can't condemn people for being fed up with all that.

There are obvious signals that some countries are considering, even preparing, the transition from pandemic to endemic and the return to normalcy. The more of them and the quicker the transition, the better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 06:40:21 AM
Pfizer CEO: Virus will be here for years but this may be last wave with restrictions (https://www.timesofisrael.com/pfizer-ceo-virus-will-be-here-for-years-but-this-may-be-last-wave-with-restrictions/)

Pfizer boss Albert Bourla said Monday that although the "most likely scenario" is that coronavirus will be circulating for many years to come, he believes the current wave of infections will be the final one that requires restrictions.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 07:02:28 AM
Quote from: Que on January 19, 2022, 04:32:43 AM
I think another real risk now is "Covid fatigue", which will lead to dismissing caution and ignoring bad news. There seems already be a downturn in the number of people that follow the rules and turn up for another shot.

Worst case scenario would be if a new variant strikes when most have decided that they dont give a sh%t anymore.

Also a class divide. White collar workers/upper middle class people can work at home or have a paid/non-paid leave. Wage earners must go out and work to make a living.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 19, 2022, 07:26:47 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 06:04:17 AM
Well, the world can't live the remainder of the century from lockdown to lockdown and from booster to booster.

I don't think it will come to that. But realistically, it seems the advent of one or two more "problematic" variants cannot be ruled out. At least the WHO does not. This would keep us occupied for at least another year or so - but not the rest of the century.

QuoteYou can't condemn people for being fed up with all that.

I'm not. Who isn't fed up? Hell, I was fed up with all of this a long time ago!  8)

QuoteThere are obvious signals that some countries are considering, even preparing, the transition from pandemic to endemic and the return to normalcy. The more of them and the quicker the transition, the better.

Well, it all depends on whether Omicron will be the last problematic variant or not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 07:47:03 AM
Czech singer dies after catching Covid intentionally.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60050996
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 19, 2022, 09:16:48 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 07:02:28 AM
Also a class divide. White collar workers/upper middle class people can work at home or have a paid/non-paid leave. Wage earners must go out and work to make a living.

Aye, a new variety of white privilege.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 19, 2022, 09:18:04 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 07:47:03 AM
Czech singer dies after catching Covid intentionally.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60050996

Give that singer a Darwin award.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 19, 2022, 09:44:38 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 19, 2022, 09:16:48 AM
Aye, a new variety of white privilege.
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 07:02:28 AM
Also a class divide. White collar workers/upper middle class people can work at home or have a paid/non-paid leave. Wage earners must go out and work to make a living.
I heard a story earlier (on good ole NPR) about families struggling with childcare costs; some of the poorer families (when the childcare clinics close due to a Covid infection there) are then having to bring their exposed kids to work with them because they can't afford to pay more for childcare.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 19, 2022, 10:10:57 AM
Interesting 8)

Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch issue statement rebuking report over masks

By Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr Bloomberg, Updated January 19, 2022, 47 minutes ago

(Bloomberg) — Two Supreme Court justices issued a rare statement Wednesday over what is for many Americans a common refrain -- whether their coworkers should wear a mask.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, 67, who has been taking part in U.S. Supreme Court arguments remotely amid the Covid surge, said she did not ask Justice Neil Gorsuch to wear a mask during arguments.

National Public Radio reported on Tuesday that Chief Justice John Roberts had asked all justices to wear masks but that Gorsuch refused. CNN also reported Sotomayor, who is diabetic and may face more health risks from Covid, is absent from the courtroom because she's uncomfortable with unmasked colleagues. CNN said that she expressed concerns to Roberts but didn't ask Gorsuch directly to mask.

When asked whether Roberts pressed the other justices to wear masks, a court spokeswoman said that she had no additional information beyond the statement from Sotomayor and Gorsuch.

The two justices said Wednesday that "while we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends."

The public statement was rare from a branch of the federal government that operates in a culture of secrecy, in which leaks to the media are infrequent even as the court has become ideologically more one sided with a 6-3 conservative majority. The justices argue fervently in the courtroom on such divisive issues as abortion rights and gun control but lunch together weekly and frequently profess that they remain cordial.

The court has increasingly become a focal point in U.S. politics as divisiveness has increased and that is true of the coverage of the court as well.

Fox News early Wednesday said it debunked the claim from the more liberal NPR, citing its own sources and a former Gorsuch law clerk as saying neither Roberts nor Sotomayor had asked colleagues to wear masks.

"Fact Check: 100% False. The Chief never asked his colleagues to mask up, for any reason," tweeted Mike Davis, a former Gorsuch law clerk.

The court's jurists remained mum about the situation during arguments Wednesday in a case involving federal election law and loans a senator gave his campaign. No one said a word about masks. Gorsuch was the only justice without a mask although others took them off occasionally during the arguments.

Reporters in the courtroom and lawyers arguing before the court are required to wear the face coverings.

The situation is all the more odd because Gorsuch and Sotomayor sit next to each other on the Supreme Court bench, and bantered in a friendly manner while Sotomayor was the only justice masked up until the recent omicron surge. Even though Gorsuch is more conservative on issues and Sotomayor is now regarded as the most liberal on the court, the two have previously attended the same virtual events and joined together in calling for a return to civil discourse.

Last April, they lamented at an event about the nation's collective inability to listen to one another, calling it a national security threat in a politically fractious time.

"This is the scariest of times, and the most exciting of times," Sotomayor said in the recorded video conversation. "We had one of highest turnouts in voting the last election. Yet at the same time we see some of the cracks in our system."

Gorsuch said that democracy is "not an automatic thing" and could crumble if Americans don't tend to it.

"Our enemies know this, even if we don't," he said. "And it is no surprise that a lot of the false information spread on social media is deliberately spread by our enemies to sow disagreement internally in the country."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 10:23:37 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 19, 2022, 09:18:04 AM
Give that singer a Darwin award.

;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 10:28:39 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 19, 2022, 10:10:57 AM
Interesting 8)

Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch issue statement rebuking report over masks

By Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr Bloomberg, Updated January 19, 2022, 47 minutes ago

(Bloomberg) — Two Supreme Court justices issued a rare statement Wednesday over what is for many Americans a common refrain -- whether their coworkers should wear a mask.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, 67, who has been taking part in U.S. Supreme Court arguments remotely amid the Covid surge, said she did not ask Justice Neil Gorsuch to wear a mask during arguments.

National Public Radio reported on Tuesday that Chief Justice John Roberts had asked all justices to wear masks but that Gorsuch refused. CNN also reported Sotomayor, who is diabetic and may face more health risks from Covid, is absent from the courtroom because she's uncomfortable with unmasked colleagues. CNN said that she expressed concerns to Roberts but didn't ask Gorsuch directly to mask.

When asked whether Roberts pressed the other justices to wear masks, a court spokeswoman said that she had no additional information beyond the statement from Sotomayor and Gorsuch.

The two justices said Wednesday that "while we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends."

The public statement was rare from a branch of the federal government that operates in a culture of secrecy, in which leaks to the media are infrequent even as the court has become ideologically more one sided with a 6-3 conservative majority. The justices argue fervently in the courtroom on such divisive issues as abortion rights and gun control but lunch together weekly and frequently profess that they remain cordial.

The court has increasingly become a focal point in U.S. politics as divisiveness has increased and that is true of the coverage of the court as well.

Fox News early Wednesday said it debunked the claim from the more liberal NPR, citing its own sources and a former Gorsuch law clerk as saying neither Roberts nor Sotomayor had asked colleagues to wear masks.

"Fact Check: 100% False. The Chief never asked his colleagues to mask up, for any reason," tweeted Mike Davis, a former Gorsuch law clerk.

The court's jurists remained mum about the situation during arguments Wednesday in a case involving federal election law and loans a senator gave his campaign. No one said a word about masks. Gorsuch was the only justice without a mask although others took them off occasionally during the arguments.

Reporters in the courtroom and lawyers arguing before the court are required to wear the face coverings.

The situation is all the more odd because Gorsuch and Sotomayor sit next to each other on the Supreme Court bench, and bantered in a friendly manner while Sotomayor was the only justice masked up until the recent omicron surge. Even though Gorsuch is more conservative on issues and Sotomayor is now regarded as the most liberal on the court, the two have previously attended the same virtual events and joined together in calling for a return to civil discourse.

Last April, they lamented at an event about the nation's collective inability to listen to one another, calling it a national security threat in a politically fractious time.

"This is the scariest of times, and the most exciting of times," Sotomayor said in the recorded video conversation. "We had one of highest turnouts in voting the last election. Yet at the same time we see some of the cracks in our system."

Gorsuch said that democracy is "not an automatic thing" and could crumble if Americans don't tend to it.

"Our enemies know this, even if we don't," he said. "And it is no surprise that a lot of the false information spread on social media is deliberately spread by our enemies to sow disagreement internally in the country."

Regardless of whether or not Roberts formerly requested them to wear mask, why does Gorsuch refrain from wearing mask at a Fed building? Is it even legal? You are right to call him assxxxx.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 19, 2022, 10:29:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 19, 2022, 09:44:38 AM
I heard a story earlier (on good ole NPR) about families struggling with childcare costs; some of the poorer families (when the childcare clinics close due to a Covid infection there) are then having to bring their exposed kids to work with them because they can't afford to pay more for childcare.

PD

I heard a lot of similar stories. Sad.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 19, 2022, 12:39:53 PM
Quote from: Florestan on January 19, 2022, 04:23:43 AM
In the last two years WHO made lots of contradictory statements from the very beginning. They have zero credibility in my book.

You really don't understand how science works, do you?

You, or anyone else who complains when the available information changes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 04:43:50 AM
AP:  "Chief Justice James Allsop and Justices James Besanko and David O'Callaghan on Thursday released a 27-page explanation of why they rejected Djokovic's challenge."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/judges-didnt-consider-wisdom-of-deporting-novak-djokovic/ar-AASY7rR

Meanwhile, certain sources (who?) apparently have spoken to Novak's agent, Edoardo Artladi, that Novak is in talks with his lawyers about possibly suing the Australian government for 3.2 million pounds for "ill treatment".

And I also found out that besides being the tournament director of the Australian Open, Craig Tiley is also head of Tennis Australia....though there is also a board of directors too.  And he's not stepping down.  I wonder how involved they were in terms of the whole mess?

Who paid for Novak's defense?  I've seen various articles, some of which say that it will be the Australian people--the taxpayers--through money from TA, but others say that that isn't true.  Anyone here know?  Madiel? TA has apparently denied it.  Since Novak lost, would he have to pay for all of the costs?  Not just his lawyers, but also cover all of the prosecution's costs--which add up.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 05:01:05 AM
I should also include this recent news:  https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/djokovic-buys-80-danish-biotech-developing-covid-19-treatment-ceo-2022-01-19/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=twitter

Novak and his wife Jelena bought 80% of a Danish company which is trying to come up with a treatment for Covid (Note:  not a vaccine)....apparently, they purchased their parts of it back in June of 2020.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 20, 2022, 08:53:12 AM
In another encouraging sign that Omicron may be loosening its grip on the state, the amount of coronavirus detected in Eastern Massachusetts waste water has continued its dizzying decline in recent days, according to data released Thursday by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.

The numbers have dropped to less than a quarter of their Omicron-fueled peaks early this month, though they are remain higher than they were during last winter's surge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 09:16:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 20, 2022, 08:53:12 AM
In another encouraging sign that Omicron may be loosening its grip on the state, the amount of coronavirus detected in Eastern Massachusetts waste water has continued its dizzying decline in recent days, according to data released Thursday by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.

The numbers have dropped to less than a quarter of their Omicron-fueled peaks early this month, though they are remain higher than they were during last winter's surge.

Good news for you Karl!  Happy to hear it...and may it continue.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 20, 2022, 09:20:34 AM
Thanks, PD. Waiting for more signs of the ebb, before resuming church choir. Meanwhile, we worry that our mask-averse sister has bronchitis or worse now, but we are having trouble getting her to see a doctor to check her out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 09:29:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 20, 2022, 09:20:34 AM
Thanks, PD. Waiting for more signs of the ebb, before resuming church choir. Meanwhile, we worry that our mask-averse sister has bronchitis or worse now, but we are having trouble getting her to see a doctor to check her out.
Oh, dear!  Sorry to hear that.  Has she done any at-home tests?  And is it a case that she hates or has issues with seeing a doctor?  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 20, 2022, 09:30:46 AM
 "Novak is Serbia, Serbia is Novak." Hyper-nationalism and delusion in Serbia.
Serbian prime minister preaches what democracy is.
It would be fair to say that I saw a similar thing in the USA at the time of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/20/sport/djokovic-serbia-national-hero-intl-spt/index.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 20, 2022, 09:55:24 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 09:29:03 AM
Oh, dear!  Sorry to hear that.  Has she done any at-home tests?  And is it a case that she hates or has issues with seeing a doctor?  :(

PD

Her "issue" is that she's been convinced by her rubbishy sources that "masks are bad for you," and since even in Tennessee one must wear a mask to go to a doctor, she refuses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 20, 2022, 10:08:35 AM
(A guess would be then that a whole bunch of people advising her directly and repeatedly, including maybe the doctor, would perhaps be the best solution ... )
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 20, 2022, 12:56:26 PM
COVID-19 cases have peaked in Massachusetts

The data indicate Massachusetts is headed toward a respite, and the United States also will see cases decline, said Dr. Jacob Lemieux, an infectious disease specialist at Massachusetts General Hospital. But he cautioned that "every expectation with this virus comes with a caveat because it's always making us look silly."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 20, 2022, 01:09:39 PM
What happens after Omicron? Some experts predict a lull but say the virus could have more tricks up its sleeve

By Martin Finucane Globe Staff, Updated January 20, 2022, 1 hour ago

The surge fueled by the Omicron variant will likely fade in the weeks ahead in the United States, experts say, and encouraging case declines have already emerged in Massachusetts and other states in the Northeast.

But what comes after that? Some experts are expecting a lull in the pandemic followed by a decline in the severity of future waves. But many also warn that it's hard to predict where the pandemic will go next — and a new variant could throw everything into doubt.

"I want to emphasize that we don't know what comes after Omicron," said Dr. Jake Lemieux, an infectious disease specialist at Massachusetts General Hospital and co-leader of the viral variants program at the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness.

"I think we should be optimistic about where we are, because we have learned a lot about vaccines, we have new drugs that are available, and we have now public health tools that we know work well," he said in a media briefing Tuesday. "But the pandemic has been incredibly humbling in that, you know, it's impossible really to predict with certainty what is going to happen."

One possible scenario is that the Omicron surge will subside and be followed by a pandemic hiatus of sorts, because of the large number of people who will have been infected, vaccinated, or both.

"I think we're going to go through a pretty quiet period," said Matthew Fox, a professor of epidemiology and global health at Boston University School of Public Health, with previous infections and vaccinations creating a "wall" against the virus. It's the "most likely pattern," he said.

"I think we will have a relative lull," Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, told STAT News this week.

Once it's swept past, the Omicron surge could also make future pandemic waves less intense, some experts argue.

"By infecting large numbers of people quickly, [Omicron] is also generating immunity quickly. And that counts toward making Covid-19 a more manageable illness, since the layers of immunity may provide protection against future waves and variants," William Hanage, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and a co-director of its Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, suggested Wednesday in a New York Times op-ed.

"No one should confidently assert that Omicron signals the end of the pandemic, but we should be confident that future surges of infections, whether with Omicron or whatever variant comes next, will make fewer of us seriously ill than they would have before," he asserted.

Christopher H. Murray, director of the University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, sounded an even more optimistic note Wednesday in a commentary in the journal The Lancet. "After the omicron wave, COVID-19 will return but the pandemic will not," he said.

The future health impacts of the spread of the coronavirus "will be less because of broad previous exposure to the virus, regularly adapted vaccines to new antigens or variants, the advent of antivirals, and the knowledge that the vulnerable can protect themselves during future waves when needed by using high-quality masks and physical distancing," he said.

"COVID-19 will become another recurrent disease that health systems and societies will have to manage," he said.

But others aren't quite as confident, worrying about the possible rise of a new variant that could circumvent existing immunity.

"The biggest threat would be the emergence of a new strain resistant to prior infection and vaccination," said Fox.

Lemieux said, "I do think things will get better. But we're going to have to keep a really close eye on the evolution of this virus because that has continued to be a major factor in the pandemic to date and I don't expect that to change."

Paul Bieniasz, head of the laboratory of retrovirology at Rockefeller University, said the optimistic outlook, which is "completely plausible," is that the coronavirus will one day join other coronaviruses, such as those that cause the common cold, in causing only mild disease.

"But that is not inevitable. It's not a given that that's going to happen," he said.

"What keeps me awake at night is thinking about what the properties of the next variant will be," he said Thursday. "The notion of whether there will be another variant — that's not in doubt. There will be. What is in doubt is what its properties will be and how effectively our immune systems will be able to deal with it."

Some experts have even warned of the nightmare scenario of a new variant that would be just as transmissible as Omicron while at the same time causing disease as severe as the Delta variant that it replaced.

Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, warned Tuesday in a tweet that the immunity generated by Omicron might fade fast, opening the door to a variant as soon as this spring.

"There's no consensus, but I feel that omicron will not produce long lasting or durable protection and we'll be vulnerable to a new variant this spring/summer," he said.

Experts say that as long as there are large groups of unvaccinated people worldwide, the virus can infect people, replicate, and continue to mutate, producing new variants.[emphasis mine—kh] And they've called for using the post-Omicron window to vaccinate places that currently have little protection, such as Africa, where only a small fraction of people have gotten shots.

"The biggest thing we could do to minimize the likelihood" of another variant emerging is "to get vaccinations around the world," Fox said. "That's got to be a huge focus."

"Vaccinating the world has always been important," said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. "For the past two years, scientists have been warning that variants arise and cross borders."

Moore emphasized that no one knows for sure what will happen next. "Who saw the Delta wave? Who saw the Omicron wave?" he said. "We don't know what's going to happen. ... Crystal ball-gazing by people in the scientific community doesn't have a perfect record."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 20, 2022, 02:32:54 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 20, 2022, 01:09:39 PM
What happens after Omicron? Some experts predict a lull but say the virus could have more tricks up its sleeve

Thanks for posting this. I'm afraid, that much of the predictions in the article will come true. We have during the last two years witnessed four SARS-2 variants - that's one each half year (Wuhan, alfa, delta and now omikron), which all have spread worldwide in a very short time and taken the lead one after the other. It is only a matter of - I think relatively short - time before we will see the next variant which probably won't become detected before it has spread rather much (like the omikron did), at least if it has it's origin in a country which doesn't do many tests - not to talk about sequence-analyzing. The parts of the third world, where the omikron is prevalent fit the description suitably.  It is only to hope, that it won't cause more disease than omikron.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 20, 2022, 02:52:09 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 20, 2022, 04:43:50 AM
Who paid for Novak's defense?  I've seen various articles, some of which say that it will be the Australian people--the taxpayers--through money from TA, but others say that that isn't true.  Anyone here know?  Madiel? TA has apparently denied it.  Since Novak lost, would he have to pay for all of the costs?  Not just his lawyers, but also cover all of the prosecution's costs--which add up.

PD

It's purely rumours that Tennis Australia paid anything, and given they've denied it I'd believe them. There's no particular reason that they would as far as I can see. Not least because Djokovic would have sufficient funds.

And yes, he'd have to pay the costs of the other side. I'm fairly sure the standard costs order was made.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today. Thankfully, both have been vaccinated (but dad is due for his booster next month and mom needs to get hers, ASAP). I believe I had COVID earlier in the month (not too long after New Year's) and I obviously gave it to them. I took the COVID test when I got home from work tonight and tested negative. Anyway, it's that pesky Omicron variant that's been going around --- I had chest congestion, back ache, low-grade fever and a sore throat (not to mention a cough, but it wasn't as severe as the muscle aches I experienced). Please wish us well as this is the last thing we need in our lives.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 20, 2022, 07:54:11 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today.

My prayer for your parents, John. The back pain and muscle pain sound like Omicron. Glad you recovered quickly. Since your parents are vaccinated, they will recover soon. Hope they will get well ASAP.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 20, 2022, 10:24:40 PM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today. Thankfully, both have been vaccinated (but dad is due for his booster next month and mom needs to get hers, ASAP). I believe I had COVID earlier in the month (not too long after New Year's) and I obviously gave it to them. I took the COVID test when I got home from work tonight and tested negative. Anyway, it's that pesky Omicron variant that's been going around --- I had chest congestion, back ache, low-grade fever and a sore throat (not to mention a cough, but it wasn't as severe as the muscle aches I experienced). Please wish us well as this is the last thing we need in our lives.

Sorry to hear. Hopefully the vaccination will help minimise the impacts - there's good evidence that it improves the course of the infection even when it doesn't prevent it.  All the very best wishes for your parents.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 20, 2022, 11:49:03 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 20, 2022, 10:24:40 PM
Sorry to hear. Hopefully the vaccination will help minimise the impacts - there's good evidence that it improves the course of the infection even when it doesn't prevent it.  All the very best wishes for your parents.

+1 from here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:03:14 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today. Thankfully, both have been vaccinated (but dad is due for his booster next month and mom needs to get hers, ASAP). I believe I had COVID earlier in the month (not too long after New Year's) and I obviously gave it to them. I took the COVID test when I got home from work tonight and tested negative. Anyway, it's that pesky Omicron variant that's been going around --- I had chest congestion, back ache, low-grade fever and a sore throat (not to mention a cough, but it wasn't as severe as the muscle aches I experienced). Please wish us well as this is the last thing we need in our lives.
Wishing you all good health!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 21, 2022, 01:02:34 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:03:14 AM
Wishing you all good health!

PD

+ 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on January 21, 2022, 01:52:55 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today. Thankfully, both have been vaccinated (but dad is due for his booster next month and mom needs to get hers, ASAP). I believe I had COVID earlier in the month (not too long after New Year's) and I obviously gave it to them. I took the COVID test when I got home from work tonight and tested negative. Anyway, it's that pesky Omicron variant that's been going around --- I had chest congestion, back ache, low-grade fever and a sore throat (not to mention a cough, but it wasn't as severe as the muscle aches I experienced). Please wish us well as this is the last thing we need in our lives.
Best wishes for you and your family, John! Hoping the disease takes the mild form (as is thankfully the case with the vast majority of infections these days).

Un abrazo fuerte desde Madrid,

Rafael
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 21, 2022, 03:14:24 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 21, 2022, 01:02:34 AM
+ 1

+ 2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2022, 06:14:07 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 20, 2022, 07:54:11 PM
My prayer for your parents, John. The back pain and muscle pain sound like Omicron. Glad you recovered quickly. Since your parents are vaccinated, they will recover soon. Hope they will get well ASAP.

+ 3 or 4
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2022, 06:38:58 AM
6 Czech players test positive before Olympic training camp — 9:40 a.m.
By The Associated Press

Six players on the Czech Republic's Olympic hockey team have tested positive for the coronavirus, national team coach Filip Pešán said Friday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 06:41:25 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on January 20, 2022, 07:21:43 PM
Both of my parents have COVID as they tested positive today.


I heard that Melatonin may partially reduce the severity and duration of Covid infection. Though I am not sure of the validity of this hypothesis, probably it won't have an adversarial effect at least. You may want to research on the subject.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 06:44:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2022, 06:38:58 AM
6 Czech players test positive before Olympic training camp — 9:40 a.m.
By The Associated Press

Six players on the Czech Republic's Olympic hockey team have tested positive for the coronavirus, national team coach Filip Pešán said Friday.
That stinks!  Poor team!

Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 06:41:25 AM

I heard that Melatonin may partially reduce the severity and duration of Covid infection. Though I am not sure of the validity of this hypothesis, probably it won't have an adversarial effect at least. You may want to research on the subject.
Interesting!  Do you recall where you heard/read that?  If nothing else, it might help you get a better night's sleep = better healing by the body (vs. tossing and turning...though if one has a high fever and aches, even that might not help you to sleep better.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 06:52:29 AM
American Airlines plane turns around mid-flight over mask row 

150 unruly passengers in the last two weeks.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60080080
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 21, 2022, 06:54:31 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 20, 2022, 07:54:11 PM
My prayer for your parents, John. The back pain and muscle pain sound like Omicron. Glad you recovered quickly. Since your parents are vaccinated, they will recover soon. Hope they will get well ASAP.

Quote from: Madiel on January 20, 2022, 10:24:40 PM
Sorry to hear. Hopefully the vaccination will help minimise the impacts - there's good evidence that it improves the course of the infection even when it doesn't prevent it.  All the very best wishes for your parents.

Quote from: MusicTurner on January 20, 2022, 11:49:03 PM
+1 from here.

Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:03:14 AM
Wishing you all good health!

PD

Quote from: Florestan on January 21, 2022, 01:02:34 AM
+ 1

Quote from: ritter on January 21, 2022, 01:52:55 AM
Best wishes for you and your family, John! Hoping the disease takes the mild form (as is thankfully the case with the vast majority of infections these days).

Un abrazo fuerte desde Madrid,

Rafael

Quote from: (: premont :) on January 21, 2022, 03:14:24 AM
+ 2

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 21, 2022, 06:14:07 AM
+ 3 or 4

Thank you all so much. I really appreciate it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 07:01:30 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 06:52:29 AM
American Airlines plane turns around mid-flight over mask row 

150 unruly passengers in the last two weeks.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60080080
I read that earlier this morning.  All it takes is one stubborn and unruly passenger to screw it up for everyone else!  Urgh!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 07:08:25 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 07:01:30 AM
I read that earlier this morning.  All it takes is one stubborn and unruly passenger to screw it up for everyone else!  Urgh!

PD

SCOTUS is not better!


Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 06:44:03 AM

Interesting!  Do you recall where you heard/read that?  If nothing else, it might help you get a better night's sleep = better healing by the body (vs. tossing and turning...though if one has a high fever and aches, even that might not help you to sleep better.

PD

I read a few academic and science articles. Again, I am not definitely sure about the statistical validity (who would be?).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 21, 2022, 07:12:08 AM
Best wishes for a speedy recovery for your parents, John.

My son called 2 days ago to say he had tested positive, one day after receiving his booster shot - obviously the protection doesn't kick in instantly. He has a sore throat, headaches and general fatigue. He's very upset as he's been extra careful all the time and works from home. He did that one day trekking excursion and got a lift from a friend. They were not wearing masks for the ride back in the car... ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on January 21, 2022, 07:48:26 AM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 07:12:08 AM
Best wishes for a speedy recovery for your parents, John.

My son called 2 days ago to say he had tested positive, one day after receiving his booster shot - obviously the protection doesn't kick in instantly. He has a sore throat, headaches and general fatigue. He's very upset as he's been extra careful all the time and works from home. He did that one day trekking excursion and got a lift from a friend. They were not wearing masks for the ride back in the car... ::)

Thanks, Andre and hope your son gets better. People seem to be having a huge problem following health guidelines and, thus, resulting in more and more cases being reported. What people need to understand is there's no finger-wagging involved if health officials ask that you please wear a mask and maintain social distancing. We can get on with our lives, but precautions must be made.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 07:54:25 AM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 07:12:08 AM
Best wishes for a speedy recovery for your parents, John.

My son called 2 days ago to say he had tested positive, one day after receiving his booster shot - obviously the protection doesn't kick in instantly. He has a sore throat, headaches and general fatigue. He's very upset as he's been extra careful all the time and works from home. He did that one day trekking excursion and got a lift from a friend. They were not wearing masks for the ride back in the car... ::)

Andre, your son is in my prayers. It appears that he had been infected/contacted BEFORE the booster shot. I tend to think that it was fortunate that he had a booster, which would significantly reduce the severity of the infection and enhances the recovery. Hope he will get well soon. My prayers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 07:08:25 AM
SCOTUS is not better!
Not following your earlier comment here.   Not certain what you were referring to.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 21, 2022, 10:09:04 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 07:54:25 AM
Andre, your son is in my prayers. It appears that he had been infected/contacted BEFORE the booster shot. I tend to think that it was fortunate that he had a booster, which would significantly reduce the severity of the infection and enhances the recovery. Hope he will get well soon. My prayers.

Thanks Brett !

My feeling too is that the booster shot will help him not develop severe symptoms. One of my daughters caught it last year, it was probably the Delta. She was hit rather hard but recovered normally.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on January 21, 2022, 10:23:35 AM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 07:12:08 AM
...
My son called 2 days ago to say he had tested positive, one day after receiving his booster shot - obviously the protection doesn't kick in instantly. He has a sore throat, headaches and general fatigue. He's very upset as he's been extra careful all the time and works from home. He did that one day trekking excursion and got a lift from a friend. They were not wearing masks for the ride back in the car... ::)
I wish your son a speedy recovery, André!

Amitiés,

Rafael
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 21, 2022, 10:45:06 AM
Quote from: ritter on January 21, 2022, 10:23:35 AM
I wish your son a speedy recovery, André!

Amitiés,

Rafael

Moi aussi!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 11:03:28 AM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 07:12:08 AM
Best wishes for a speedy recovery for your parents, John.

My son called 2 days ago to say he had tested positive, one day after receiving his booster shot - obviously the protection doesn't kick in instantly. He has a sore throat, headaches and general fatigue. He's very upset as he's been extra careful all the time and works from home. He did that one day trekking excursion and got a lift from a friend. They were not wearing masks for the ride back in the car... ::)
One day trekking excursion?  By that do you mean that they went for a long hike together or that he just gave him a lift to a trail and then picked him up later?  Just curious.

Regardless, I am very sorry to hear that he has Covid and hope that he gets better soon.

Has his friend been tested?  I hope that he or she is o.k. too.

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on January 21, 2022, 11:07:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 11:03:28 AM
One day trekking excursion?  By that do you mean that they went for a long hike together or that he just gave him a lift to a trail and then picked him up later?  Just curious.

Regardless, I am very sorry to hear that he has Covid and hope that he gets better soon.

Has his friend been tested?  I hope that he or she is o.k. too.

All the best,

PD

No, it was just a lift back home, about 75 km ride. The excursion itself was a small group, well distanced and of course en plein air - no chance of catching a virus. It's the car ride: closed space, 45 mins, no mask...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 21, 2022, 11:19:44 AM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 11:07:03 AM
No, it was just a lift back home, about 75 km ride. The excursion itself was a small group, well distanced and of course en plein air - no chance of catching a virus. It's the car ride: closed space, 45 mins, no mask...

That's most probably how I and my wife caught it in late February 2021: we visited a monastery 2 hrs away from Bucharest and on our way back we took in our car two ladies who were living in the nearest city, about 45 mins, no mask anyone of us.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2022, 11:26:09 AM
84% of my town is vaccinated. (Just chanced on a chart)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:22:14 PM
Quote from: André on January 21, 2022, 11:07:03 AM
No, it was just a lift back home, about 75 km ride. The excursion itself was a small group, well distanced and of course en plein air - no chance of catching a virus. It's the car ride: closed space, 45 mins, no mask...
Sorry to hear that.  Between you and Floristan's comments...yes, using a mask helps, but (just tossing it out there) if you're sitting next to someone or are a couple of feet away (backseat to front at best), would being masked truly contain the virus for such a long time and so close together?  Yes, I think that it would help, but if you were in close proximity for more than a few minutes, would that have prevented catching Covid?  What do our doctors/medical pros think?  Just asking questions and trying to figure it out....  :(

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 12:35:31 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:22:14 PM
Sorry to hear that.  Between you and Floristan's comments...yes, using a mask helps, but (just tossing it out there) if you're sitting next to someone or are a couple of feet away (backseat to front at best), would being masked truly contain the virus for such a long time and so close together?  Yes, I think that it would help, but if you were in close proximity for more than a few minutes, would that have prevented catching Covid?  What do our doctors/medical pros think?  Just asking questions and trying to figure it out....  :(

PD

Probably masks by infected people are relatively more effective than masks by non-infected people. Still, the latter reduces the chance/probability of getting infected.

Jfyi,

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/17/wearing-masks-single-most-effective-way-to-tackle-covid-study-finds

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342409160_Face_mask_wearing_rate_predicts_country's_COVID-19_death_rates

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249891

https://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/Projects/COVID/Mask_use_infographic_2020-1.pdf


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2022, 02:43:27 PM
Mass. reports 86,450 breakthrough COVID-19 cases, raising total to 6.8 percent of fully vaccinated people
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 21, 2022, 04:28:26 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 21, 2022, 12:22:14 PM
Sorry to hear that.  Between you and Floristan's comments...yes, using a mask helps, but (just tossing it out there) if you're sitting next to someone or are a couple of feet away (backseat to front at best), would being masked truly contain the virus for such a long time and so close together?  Yes, I think that it would help, but if you were in close proximity for more than a few minutes, would that have prevented catching Covid?  What do our doctors/medical pros think?  Just asking questions and trying to figure it out....  :(

PD

Nothing is a guarantee. It is all risk reduction.

I had several real estate agents visiting my house the week before last to talk about selling it, and also a couple of other people for related matters. Every single one of those visitors turned up to my door masked, and I wore mine as well. One of the real estate agents started having symptoms the day after his visit, meaning that he most likely was already infected the previous afternoon. I'm obviously glad that we were taking precautions (my rapid antigen test was negative), but if I had got infected I wouldn't have blamed him, because we were taking precautions.

Also he's vaccinated, which as well as helping make his infection less severe reduces his chance of spreading it. His immediate family have tested negative.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 21, 2022, 04:38:32 PM
Yes: both zero-COVID and zero-risk were always mirages.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 22, 2022, 02:51:08 AM
Irish government removes most of its Covid rules (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60078125)

The Irish government has agreed to lift almost all of its Covid-19 restrictions from Saturday, Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) Micheál Martin has said.

"Today is a good day," Mr Martin said, as he told a press conference that the Republic of Ireland had "weathered the Omicron storm".

He said customers would no longer need to show proof of Covid status to enter hospitality and entertainment venues.

Bars, restaurants and nightclubs will also return to normal trading hours.

Currently, hospitality and cultural venues including pubs, restaurants, cinemas and theatres must close by 20:00 local time.

Mr Martin also confirmed that restrictions on household gatherings would end and the limits on the numbers of people who can attend events were being abolished.

The government is also lifting its rules about working from home, which would allow a gradual return to the workplace to begin, the taoiseach said.

However, rules on wearing masks on public transport and most public buildings will stay in place for now, as he urged the public to continue to follow the remaining public health advice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 22, 2022, 04:08:16 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 21, 2022, 04:28:26 PM
Nothing is a guarantee. It is all risk reduction.

I had several real estate agents visiting my house the week before last to talk about selling it, and also a couple of other people for related matters. Every single one of those visitors turned up to my door masked, and I wore mine as well. One of the real estate agents started having symptoms the day after his visit, meaning that he most likely was already infected the previous afternoon. I'm obviously glad that we were taking precautions (my rapid antigen test was negative), but if I had got infected I wouldn't have blamed him, because we were taking precautions.

Also he's vaccinated, which as well as helping make his infection less severe reduces his chance of spreading it. His immediate family have tested negative.
Yep!

Glad that you didn't also catch it; hope that he's o.k. soon too.

I'm trying to remember, were you the one who had recently bought a new house (after struggling to find one in your area with a certain floor plan and getting outbidded in your earlier efforts?)?  Or was that someone else on the forum?

Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 21, 2022, 12:35:31 PM
Probably masks by infected people are relatively more effective than masks by non-infected people. Still, the latter reduces the chance/probability of getting infected.

Jfyi,

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/17/wearing-masks-single-most-effective-way-to-tackle-covid-study-finds

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342409160_Face_mask_wearing_rate_predicts_country's_COVID-19_death_rates

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249891

https://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/Projects/COVID/Mask_use_infographic_2020-1.pdf

I try and be very careful at my end--particularly as far as mask wearing is concerned.  I even wear it when outside and walking around town.  They are now recommending N95 masks if one can tolerate them.  I should see if I can get my hands on a few of them.  I've been using your basic medical-type masks with the wire nose piece.

PD



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 22, 2022, 09:37:03 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 22, 2022, 04:08:16 AM
I'm trying to remember, were you the one who had recently bought a new house (after struggling to find one in your area with a certain floor plan and getting outbidded in your earlier efforts?)?  Or was that someone else on the forum?

Yes, that's me.

I was supposed to complete the purchase and get the keys on Monday. It now won't be Monday, because one part of my bank completely mucked up the paperwork. Hopefully only a few days delay.

So now beginning to organise sale of the old house, and painting in both houses, and a removalist.  And I'm spending my weekend wrapping my head around fridge options only to discover the ideal fridge might be too tall because they want 4 inches clearance above it...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 23, 2022, 02:45:25 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 22, 2022, 09:37:03 PM
Yes, that's me.

I was supposed to complete the purchase and get the keys on Monday. It now won't be Monday, because one part of my bank completely mucked up the paperwork. Hopefully only a few days delay.

So now beginning to organise sale of the old house, and painting in both houses, and a removalist.  And I'm spending my weekend wrapping my head around fridge options only to discover the ideal fridge might be too tall because they want 4 inches clearance above it...
Sounds like you're having a lot of fun there!

Is there any way (preferably not horribly expensive) that you can raise the area above the fridge?  In my kitchen there are cupboards above mine, so in theory, I could either alter or remove them if I wanted to get a taller fridge.  I'd love to get one which is wider and not as deep (hard for me to get at things in the back).  As is, I seldom access things in that cupboard (I keep most of my baking pans in there) as they're hard to get at and I'm not doing as much baking these days.

Fingers crossed for you re the closing!

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 23, 2022, 07:34:37 AM
Ordered my four free Covid tests directly from USPS.  Should get them soon?  I wonder whatever happened to the eight free tests per person, per month that was originally offered.  I mean, I don't, not really.  I should probably go scoop up some free N95 masks while I can, too.  It will all make me feel so very safe.  Public health theater, and all that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 23, 2022, 10:26:25 AM
Stressed hospitals are asking workers with COVID to return — even if they may be infectious — 2:03 p.m
By The Washington Post

Hospitals are increasingly asking staff who have the coronavirus to work while potentially infectious, underscoring how the hyper-transmissible omicron variant has sidelined employees, overwhelmed resources and upended nearly two years of strict protocols. Though vaccine requirements are common at hospitals, many health care workers are coming down with the virus, exacerbating staffing issues.

Ten-day isolation periods have given way to five-day ones under CDC guidelines updated late last month, with workers sometimes allowed back as long as symptoms are deemed mild and improving. Officials acknowledge even halving isolation may not be enough to keep hospitals staffed: The CDC says health care workers who test positive can keep working uninterrupted in a "crisis" - and one state, California, recently declared that hospitals could take that step for employees without symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 23, 2022, 11:37:15 AM
Similar stories here, Karl.

Also, observations that Omicron is having a bigger economic impact than all the lockdowns that people complained were having an economic impact. Who knew? Well... all the people who repeatedly calculated that a lockdown was better than mass illness when we were having lockdowns. That's who.
Title: Re: Coronavirus threads
Post by: Mandryka on January 23, 2022, 11:39:07 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 23, 2022, 11:37:15 AM
Similar stories here, Karl.

Also, observations that Omicron is having a bigger economic impact than all the lockdowns that people complained were having an economic impact. Who knew? Well... all the people who repeatedly calculated that a lockdown was better than mass illness when we were having lockdowns. That's who.

It may be very short lived and it should result in enhanced population immunity. Here in the UK, we seem to be doing more or less OK - the shops and schools and core services have been working as far as I can see, the mail comes and the supermarket shelves are full, the police catch villains, I don't know anyone who has been abandoned in a medical emergency or who has died because of bad treatment. We got over the peak in pretty short order with not much damage. Our economy is growing real fast.

But you can't generalise, omicron seems to behave significantly differently according to the existing levels of immunity in the population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 23, 2022, 11:45:42 AM
If your supermarket shelves are full then your supply chains must be in better shape than around here.

Though there are signs we might just be passing the peak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 23, 2022, 12:08:32 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 23, 2022, 11:45:42 AM
If your supermarket shelves are full then your supply chains must be in better shape than around here.

Though there are signs we might just be passing the peak.

Interesting, because in September the press here was saying that we're in the shit because our supply chains are fucked post Brexit. No truck drivers blah blah.

All they did was precipitate a completely spurious rush to stockpile petrol, which of course itself created a short lived shortage. What a lot of crap the media is! The Times of London and Auntie BBC are no better, worse in fact, than twitter and instagram.
Title: Re: Coronavirus threads
Post by: André on January 23, 2022, 01:54:34 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2022, 11:39:07 AM
It may be very short  lived and it should result in enhanced population immunity. Here in the UK, we seem to be doing more or less OK - the shops and schools and core services have been working as far as I can see, the mail comes and the supermarket shelves are full, the police catch villains, I don't know anyone who has been abandoned in a medical emergency or who has died because of bad treatment. We got over the peak in pretty short order with not much damage. Our economy is growing real fast.

But you can't generalise, omicron seems to behave significantly differently according to the existing levels of immunity in the population.

You mean Andrew Mountbatten is in jail ?  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 24, 2022, 03:53:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 23, 2022, 10:26:25 AM
Stressed hospitals are asking workers with COVID to return — even if they may be infectious — 2:03 p.m
By The Washington Post

Hospitals are increasingly asking staff who have the coronavirus to work while potentially infectious, underscoring how the hyper-transmissible omicron variant has sidelined employees, overwhelmed resources and upended nearly two years of strict protocols. Though vaccine requirements are common at hospitals, many health care workers are coming down with the virus, exacerbating staffing issues.

Ten-day isolation periods have given way to five-day ones under CDC guidelines updated late last month, with workers sometimes allowed back as long as symptoms are deemed mild and improving. Officials acknowledge even halving isolation may not be enough to keep hospitals staffed: The CDC says health care workers who test positive can keep working uninterrupted in a "crisis" - and one state, California, recently declared that hospitals could take that step for employees without symptoms.
Hard to figure out how to solve worker-shortage/healh issues.  I keep hearing stories in which it sounds like more and more health-care workers are quitting due to all of the stresses including often being overworked.   :(

Quote from: Mandryka on January 23, 2022, 12:08:32 PM
Interesting, because in September the press here was saying that we're in the shit because our supply chains are fucked post Brexit. No truck drivers blah blah.

All they did was precipitate a completely spurious rush to stockpile petrol, which of course itself created a short lived shortage. What a lot of crap the media is! The Times of London and Auntie BBC are no better, worse in fact, than twitter and instagram.

Quote from: Madiel on January 23, 2022, 11:45:42 AM
If your supermarket shelves are full then your supply chains must be in better shape than around here.

Though there are signs we might just be passing the peak.
Grocery stores' shelves have been mostly full but with some erratic cases.  It looks to me like when items go on sale, they get stripped bare quite quickly.  Other non-sale ones but basic necessities, like milk, are often there but in low amounts and certain brands sold out in the bigger grocery stores (noticed this again this past weekend), but in good supply at my local co-op.  Of course, it being winter here, there is often a run on the stores when there is talk of an upcoming winter storm.  Overall though, it hasn't been bad lately. Two weekends ago, for example, a friend wanted to get some fresh broccoli.  It was sold out at his regular grocery store, but he was able to find it at another...and he would have happily settled for carrots and peas instead.  Still seeing things like toilet paper often being in low supplies at times; it seems to sell out fairly quickly.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 24, 2022, 04:52:40 AM
The Danish health authorities have decided to offer the particularly vulnerable group a fourth Pfizer jab, so I expect to get this very soon. I got the third jab four months ago. Hopefully an omikron-specific vaccine has been developed, when the time for the fifth jab comes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 24, 2022, 04:57:05 AM
Yes, an omicron targeted one is expected within some months. Supposedly, you've already read about the survey saying that the 3rd jab still has 90% efficiency after 3 months, which is good.

Another sign of relative omicron mildness: now it's 40% of hospitalized cases here who just have the infection, without it being the reason for hospitalization. Before, it was around 20, later 25. ICUs still going down too.

But case numbers are still very high here. Hopefully a decline will start soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 24, 2022, 06:03:49 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 24, 2022, 04:57:05 AM
ICUs still going down too.

Yes, and seen in this light it's strange, that the number of fatalities (since middle of December about 14 in average) compared to the number of patients in ICU (today 43) is still rather high and even seems to be slowly raising. Is this a residue of the delta wave, and how many have died as a cause of infection with the omikron?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 24, 2022, 06:07:15 AM
Yes, I think the fatalities number is also related to old Delta and then other diseases, cf. the hospitalizations share of 40%. Haven't seen any exact stats though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 06:43:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 24, 2022, 04:57:05 AMAnother sign of relative omicron mildness: now it's 40% of hospitalized cases here who just have the infection, without it being the reason for hospitalization. Before, it was around 20, later 25. ICUs still going down too.

Saw similar news in Boston.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 24, 2022, 06:44:39 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 24, 2022, 04:52:40 AM
The Danish health authorities have decided to offer the particularly vulnerable group a fourth Pfizer jab, so I expect to get this very soon. I got the third jab four months ago. Hopefully an omikron-specific vaccine has been developed, when the time for the fifth jab comes.

Based on no data, I get the impression that the world is getting booster-happy. Spread that vaccine around more evenly and you might be better off, getting less exposure and less people in which the vaccine reside and can mutate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 06:55:00 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 24, 2022, 06:44:39 AM
Based on no data, I get the impression that the world is getting booster-happy. Spread that vaccine around more evenly and you might be better off, getting less exposure and less people in which the vaccine reside and can mutate.

Aye ... Poul himself has remarked more than once on the need to vaccinate more of the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 24, 2022, 07:01:03 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 24, 2022, 06:44:39 AM
Based on no data, I get the impression that the world is getting booster-happy. Spread that vaccine around more evenly and you might be better off, getting less exposure and less people in which the vaccine reside and can mutate.

It's only the particularly vulnerable group, which will get a fourth jab. With lesser and lesser corona-restrictions the virus becomes widspread and it will become next to impossible to avoid contact with it. Most corona deaths in our country have occured among the vulnerable and the elderly. So the antibody production of the vulnerable group has got to be stimulated as much as possible. Young healthy people don't run the same risk if they are infected.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 07:13:34 AM
Youngkin's executive order was pushing junk to the science-denying MAGA crowd, of course

Seven school boards sue to stop Gov. Youngkin's mask-optional order on the day it takes effect

By Hannah Natanson and Nicole Asbury
Today at 8:28 a.m. EST Updated today at 11:02 a.m. EST

Seven school boards — including one overseeing the largest and most prominent district in the state — are suing to stop a mask-optional order by Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) on the day it is supposed to take effect, arguing that the order violates the Virginia Constitution.

The school boards, led by Fairfax County Public Schools, whose 180,000 students make it Virginia's biggest system, filed suit Monday morning in Arlington Circuit Court. The suit asks for an immediate injunction barring enforcement of Youngkin's order, which sought to leave masking decisions to parents, contravening federal health guidance and the masking mandates that the vast majority of Virginia school districts have maintained throughout the pandemic.

In the school boards' complaint, their lawyers write that Youngkin's executive order goes against Article 8, Section 7 of Virginia's constitution, which asserts that "the supervision of schools in each school division shall be vested in a school board." The lawyers also say Youngkin's order contradicts a state law passed over the summer that requires Virginia school districts to follow federal health guidelines to the "maximum extent practicable." The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends masking inside K-12 schools for everyone over age 2, regardless of vaccination status.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 07:38:23 AM
China's success taming virus could make exit strategy harder

By ANIRUDDHA GHOSAL and HUIZHONG WU The Associated Press, Updated January 22, 2022, 5:43 a.m.

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — The sweeping "zero-tolerance" strategy that China has used to keep COVID-19 case numbers low and its economy functioning may, paradoxically, make it harder for the country to exit the pandemic.

Most experts say the coronavirus around the world isn't going away and believe it could eventually become, like the flu, a persistent but generally manageable threat if enough people gain immunity through infections and vaccines.

In countries like Britain and the U.S., which have had comparatively light restrictions against the omicron wave, there is a glimmer of hope that the process might be underway. Cases skyrocketed in recent weeks but have since dropped in Britain and may have leveled off in the U.S., perhaps because the extremely contagious variant is running out of people to infect. Some places already are talking about easing COVID-19 precautions.

China, which will be in the international spotlight when the Beijing Winter Olympics begin in two weeks, is not seeing the same dynamic.

The communist government's practice throughout the pandemic of trying to find and isolate every infected person has largely protected hospitals from becoming overwhelmed and staved off the deaths that have engulfed most of the world.

But the uncompromising approach also means most people in China have never been exposed to the virus. At the same time, the effectiveness of China's most widely used vaccines has been called into question. New studies suggest they offer significantly less protection against infection from omicron, even after three doses, than people get after booster shots of the leading Western vaccines.

Together, those factors could complicate China's effort to get past the pandemic. Experts say if the country of 1.4 billion people were to relax restrictions, it could face a surge similar to what Singapore or Australia experienced, despite a highly vaccinated population.

"China's susceptibility to outbreaks is likely to be more because most people have not been exposed to the virus due to the stringent measures that were put in place, thus lacking hybrid immunity, which is supposed to prove better protection than vaccination alone," said Dr. Vineeta Bal, an immunologist at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research.

"It is risky for China to reopen right now because omicron is spreading globally, and even if the variant doesn't cause major illness, it'll spread like wildfire," she added.

Dali Yang, a professor who studies Chinese politics at the University of Chicago, said, "It's a big challenge, for leaders, especially their rhetoric on saving lives. How do you justify opening up and then having tens of thousands of people dying in the process?"

Chinese President Xi Jinping has cited China's approach as a "major strategic success" and evidence of the "significant advantages" of its political system over Western liberal democracies.

The world's most populous nation was the only major economy to grow in 2020, and it accounted for a fraction of global deaths and infections.

As part of the country's tough-minded strategy for keeping the virus at bay, residents in Chinese cities must display their infection status on a government-monitored app to enter supermarkets, offices or even the capital.

But weeks ahead of the Olympics, omicron is testing this approach with outbreaks in the southern province of Guangdong, as well as Beijing.

Organizers of the Olympics announced they will not sell tickets locally and will allow only select spectators in. Foreign fans are not allowed.

Authorities have also asked people to not visit their hometowns around the Lunar New Year at the start of February, a move that will dampen spending during China's most important family holiday. And the major city of Xi'an in the west and parts of Ningbo, a busy port south of Shanghai, are under lockdown.

With the Communist Party gearing up for a major meeting this fall, at which Xi is expected to be appointed to a third term as party leader, China is unlikely to relax its policies in a major way any time soon.

"If the numbers from COVID start to skyrocket to big levels, then this will reflect badly on his leadership," said Willy Lam, an expert on Chinese political leadership at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

China relies heavily on its own Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines, along with several others made domestically. It has not approved the Pfizer shot, even though a Chinese company bought distribution rights in 2020.

Instead, the focus is on developing China's own mRNA vaccines, like the Pfizer and Moderna formulas. One such vaccine is in late trials.

Another option for China may be to track how the virus is evolving and put off opening its borders until it becomes even milder. But it's anyone guess when or if that might happen.

"What will the next variant be? How serious will it be? You can't tell," Bal said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 24, 2022, 08:11:55 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on January 24, 2022, 07:01:03 AM
Most corona deaths in our country worldwide have occured among the vulnerable and the elderly.

Fixed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 24, 2022, 08:33:18 AM
During the pandemic, divorce rate in the USA increased due to several factors possibly including disagreements over vaccination and govtl restriction policies.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/21/covid-has-put-pressures-and-strains-on-relationships.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 09:46:33 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 24, 2022, 08:33:18 AM
During the pandemic, divorce rate in the USA increased due to several factors possibly including disagreements over vaccination and govtl restriction policies.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/21/covid-has-put-pressures-and-strains-on-relationships.html

It's a strain on relationships, no question.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 24, 2022, 11:45:27 AM
Just ran across this article (after previously reading and hearing about other countries like France and Spain changing their restriction policies and seemingly making it more difficult to play if one isn't "double-jabbed")--Huffington Post:

Novak Djokovic Could Play In French Open Under Latest Vaccine Rules
A new French law says anyone with proof they tested positive within the previous six months is exempt from having to show a vaccine pass.
Angela Charlton and Samuel Petrequin
AP logo
01/24/2022 01:58pm EST


PARIS (AP) — Top-ranked player Novak Djokovic could be allowed to defend his French Open title under the latest COVID-19 rules adopted by the French government, even if he is still not vaccinated when the clay-court Grand Slam starts in May.
Djokovic was deported from Australia and barred from playing in the Australian Open this month for not meeting the country's strict COVID-19 vaccination rules.
It initially appeared that the Serb tennis star would not be welcomed at Roland Garros either under a new law intended to exclude the unvaccinated from stadiums, restaurants, bars and other public places.
As questions quickly arose about Djokovic's status in France following his deportation from Australia, Sports Minister Roxana Maracineanu previously said that as soon as the law was passed the country's vaccine pass would become compulsory to enter stadiums, theater or exhibitions, "for all spectators, practitioners, French or foreign professionals."
But the vaccine pass is not restricted to vaccination.
Under the law that took effect on Monday, anyone who has proof they tested positive within the previous six months is exempt from having to show a vaccine pass. That suggests Djokovic could play in the French Open in May and June, the next Grand Slam tournament, because he has said he tested positive in mid-December.
The French sports ministry was not immediately available to answer questions from The Associated Press on Djokovic.
French Open organizers have previously said it's too early to comment since virus restrictions can change between now and May depending on the virus situation.
Djokovic's team also declined to comment Monday. Djokovic said earlier he would not give public statements until the end of the Australian Open.
Cafe owners and patrons in Paris largely welcomed the new law, which is central to the government's anti-virus strategy.
"Personally, it reassures me in the sense that I know the people I have around me," said Parisian Charles Tuile. "We want to be in a place where we can be safe in terms of health. And if you can see that the waiter checks vaccine passes and even ID cards, then it's reassuring in many ways."
France is registering Europe's highest-ever daily coronavirus infection numbers, and hospitals are continuing to fill up with virus patients, even though the number of people in intensive care units has dropped in recent days.
The government has imposed few other restrictions amid the surge in the omicron variant, focusing instead on the vaccine pass, approved by France's parliament and Constitutional Council last week.
Critics question whether the pass will make much difference in a country where 94% of French adults have had at least one vaccine dose, and scattered groups held protests Saturday against the new law. The French government hopes that it protects the most vulnerable and reduces pressure on crowded ICUs, where most patients are unvaccinated.


https://www.huffpost.com/entry/novak-djokovic-could-play-french-open_n_61eef54fe4b03add23fcec32

Does anyone here know anything differently re France and rules?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on January 24, 2022, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 24, 2022, 08:11:55 AM
Fixed.

Yes, I might have written that, but I didn't.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 24, 2022, 12:00:37 PM
In completely unrelated news but it was last referred to in this thread: turns out I DID get the house keys on Monday.

So now I just have to figure out how to move house and sell the old one...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2022, 12:02:42 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 24, 2022, 12:00:37 PM
In completely unrelated news but it was last referred to in this thread: turns out I DID get the house keys on Monday.

So now I just have to figure out how to move house and sell the old one...

Congrats!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 24, 2022, 12:05:11 PM
It's never occurred to me until now, but... I think I've moved closer to the board's host!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 24, 2022, 12:14:10 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 24, 2022, 11:45:27 AM
Just ran across this article (after previously reading and hearing about other countries like France and Spain changing their restriction policies and seemingly making it more difficult to play if one isn't "double-jabbed")--Huffington Post:

Novak Djokovic Could Play In French Open Under Latest Vaccine Rules
A new French law says anyone with proof they tested positive within the previous six months is exempt from having to show a vaccine pass.
Angela Charlton and Samuel Petrequin
AP logo
01/24/2022 01:58pm EST


PD

Possibly, French Open Admin may implement a vaccination mandate independently of the gov policy in order to avoid grey area, complication and scandal. Just a possibility.

It is my understanding that France is the 4th worst country for the total/accumulative covid case. The restrictions hit worker class people and service industry while it hit upperclass people less. Relaxation of restriction could be influenced by domestic politics, rather than science, ie. size and political influence of blue collar workers, economic condition, political stability, popularity of majority/presidential party, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on January 24, 2022, 07:56:49 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-25/neil-young-threatens-to-delete-spotify-catalog-over-joe-rogan-vaccine-misinformation

January 24, 2022, 10:05 PM EST

Singer Neil Young has demanded that his music be removed from Spotify over concerns that the platform's most popular podcaster, Joe Rogan, is spreading vaccine misinformation, Rolling Stone magazine reported.

"I want you to let Spotify know immediately TODAY that I want all my music off their platform. They can have Rogan or Young. Not both," he wrote in a letter to his record company and management team, according to the magazine.

"I am doing this because Spotify is spreading fake information about vaccines — potentially causing death to those who believe the disinformation being spread by them," he added.

Earlier this month 270 scientists and medical professionals issued an open letter to Spotify, urging the streaming giant to establish a misinformation policy after an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience promoted what they said were "baseless conspiracy theories" about the pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on January 25, 2022, 02:05:30 AM
In spite of the record-breaking numbers of infections, with 46,000 today, our Danish PM is now reported to announce the end of all restrictions as per 31st of January, in a TV speech tomorrow. Also, the end of officially categorizing corona as a disease of critical society importance.

Hopefully this is not too early. Similar trends can probably be expected elsewhere.

Sweden reporting 139,000 new cases during 4-5 days since Friday, in spite of much less testing going on there. That's about 7% of the total cases discovered in Sweden since the start of the pandemic (1,9 mio).

For the history: Norwegian scientists have found the virus antibodies in local blood samples from pregnants from December 2019, a month earlier than most previous European identifications; there were some mentioned cases in Italy early on too, and possibly Sweden. First Chinese discovered examples were around the 1st of December.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2022, 02:58:24 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 24, 2022, 12:02:42 PM
Congrats!
+1

Quote from: Madiel on January 24, 2022, 12:05:11 PM
It's never occurred to me until now, but... I think I've moved closer to the board's host!
Neat!  Have you two ever met in person?

Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on January 24, 2022, 12:14:10 PM
Possibly, French Open Admin may implement a vaccination mandate independently of the gov policy in order to avoid grey area, complication and scandal. Just a possibility.

It is my understanding that France is the 4th worst country for the total/accumulative covid case. The restrictions hit worker class people and service industry while it hit upperclass people less. Relaxation of restriction could be influenced by domestic politics, rather than science, ie. size and political influence of blue collar workers, economic condition, political stability, popularity of majority/presidential party, etc.
True, they do still have that option.  After what all happened in Australia, they have a lot of thinking to do.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 25, 2022, 05:02:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2022, 02:58:24 AM
Neat!  Have you two ever met in person?

Not that I know of... I mean, I only have an avatar to go on.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 25, 2022, 08:24:39 AM
Pfizer opens study of COVID shots updated to match Omicron

By The Associated Press The Associated Press, Updated January 25, 2022, 7:03 a.m.

Pfizer has begun a study comparing its original COVID-19 vaccine with doses specially tweaked to match the hugely contagious Omicron variant.

Pfizer and its partner BioNTech announced the study on Tuesday.

COVID-19 vaccine makers have been updating their shots to better match Omicron in case global health authorities decide the change is needed.

While Omicron is more likely than previous variants to cause infection even in people who've been vaccinated, it's not yet clear that a change to the vaccine recipe is needed.

The original vaccines still offer good protection against severe illness and death. Studies in the U.S. and elsewhere have made clear that adding a booster dose strengthens that protection and improves the chances of avoiding a milder infection.

"We recognize the need to be prepared in the event this protection wanes over time and to potentially help address Omicron and new variants in the future," Kathrin Jansen, Pfizer's vaccine research chief, said in a statement.

The new U.S. study is enrolling up to 1,420 healthy adults, ages 18 to 55, to test the updated Omicron-based shots for use as a booster or for primary vaccinations. Researchers will examine the tweaked vaccine's safety and how it revs up the immune system in comparison to the original shots.

In one study group, about 600 volunteers who received two doses of the current Pfizer vaccine three to six months ago will receive either one or two Omicron-based shots as boosters. Another 600 who've already gotten three regular doses of the Pfizer vaccine will be given a fourth dose of either the regular vaccine or the Omicron-matched version.

The study also will enroll some unvaccinated volunteers who will receive three doses of the Omicron-based vaccine.

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2022, 09:03:04 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 25, 2022, 05:02:51 AM
Not that I know of... I mean, I only have an avatar to go on.  :laugh:
I thought that you might have PM'd here on the forum and perhaps contacted each other like for a cup of coffee, a concert, etc.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 25, 2022, 12:29:27 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 25, 2022, 09:03:04 AM
I thought that you might have PM'd here on the forum and perhaps contacted each other like for a cup of coffee, a concert, etc.

PD

He's on the forum so infrequently that we've never chatted. It was super weird when I realised I was probably the closest member.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on January 25, 2022, 02:10:58 PM
I'm headed your way in early April to stay with a mate of mine. While he's working during the day I'll go touring. The Mint is on my list of things to do (already done the War Memorial) and might have a look at the surrounding countryside as well. I'm not expecting Covid or anything to stop this trip. WA, is a different story. When McClown announced the April 5 border opening I booked a flight - silly me! That guy couldn't lie straight in bed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 25, 2022, 02:32:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on January 25, 2022, 02:10:58 PM
I'm headed your way in early April to stay with a mate of mine. While he's working during the day I'll go touring. The Mint is on my list of things to do (already done the War Memorial) and might have a look at the surrounding countryside as well. I'm not expecting Covid or anything to stop this trip. WA, is a different story. When McClown announced the April 5 border opening I booked a flight - silly me! That guy couldn't lie straight in bed.

What's silly is you thinking that a decision shouldn't change if the circumstances change.  Do you seriously go through your life never changing your plans based on new information? I doubt it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2022, 01:10:54 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 25, 2022, 12:29:27 PM
He's on the forum so infrequently that we've never chatted. It was super weird when I realised I was probably the closest member.

Are you in Tasmania?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 26, 2022, 03:06:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on January 26, 2022, 01:10:54 AM
Are you in Tasmania?

Canberra. It says that as my location though whether you see that depends what device you're using to access the forum.

When I say close... look I don't know Dungeon Master's exact location, but from a previous bit of information I guess he's within 15 minutes drive. And with the new house it might be more like 5. Not certain but likely.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on January 26, 2022, 06:09:03 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 26, 2022, 03:06:23 AM
Canberra. It says that as my location though whether you see that depends what device you're using to access the forum.

When I say close... look I don't know Dungeon Master's exact location, but from a previous bit of information I guess he's within 15 minutes drive. And with the new house it might be more like 5. Not certain but likely.

Ah yes. I somehow thought that dungeonmaster lived in Tasmania. Some people in the same street as me are from Australians and once they started to talk about Tasmania . . . .what they said left quite a strong impression.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 26, 2022, 07:35:34 AM
White House announces 400 million vaccination doses made to global effort
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 26, 2022, 07:40:47 AM
U.S. hits highest seven-day death average since last year

By Lateshia Beachum 4:02 a.m.

The seven-day average for covid deaths in the United States reached 2,230 on Tuesday, its highest point since late February last year, according to Washington Post data.

The highly transmissible omicron variant led to an explosive increase in coronavirus cases nationwide in December and January. Omicron, which has been shown to have less severe symptoms and outcomes than other variants, quickly overtook the delta strain of the virus. It now makes up more than 99 percent of new U.S. cases, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Deaths in the nation started climbing before the surge, brought on by the more deadly delta variant, according to data. The deadliest point of the pandemic came in January last year, when the seven-day average of new covid deaths was more than 3,300 per day.

More than 866,670 people in the United States have died of the coronavirus since the pandemic's onset, Post data shows.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 27, 2022, 03:12:09 PM
Mass. reports 18,536 new coronavirus cases among public school students and 3,150 among staff — 5:44 p.m.
By Colleen Cronin and Felicia Gans, Globe Staff

COVID cases in the Massachusetts public schools decreased for a third consecutive week, as state education leaders on Thursday reported 18,536 new cases among students and 3,150 among staff members for the week that ended Wednesday.

The 21,686 total cases were 11,223 fewer, or about 34 percent fewer, than those reported last week. Total cases had started decreasing three weeks ago, during the week that began Jan. 6, but this reporting period only marks the second time since early December that both staff and student cases have decreased.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 27, 2022, 03:15:30 PM
Zappa sang: well, ladies you can be an asshole, too:

Sarah Palin dines in NYC restaurant after testing positive for COVID and defying vaccine requirements — 11:43 a.m.
By The Washington Post

Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, who is unvaccinated and revealed this week that she tested positive for coronavirus, dined again at a New York City restaurant Wednesday night, flouting local health and safety measures calling for positive cases to isolate.

Elio's, an Italian restaurant on the Upper East Side, has faced blowback after Palin dined indoors at the establishment on Saturday, in violation of the city's dining mandate for people to show proof of vaccination. The Manhattan judge in Palin's defamation trial against the New York Times revealed Monday that the proceedings would be delayed because the Republican tested positive for the virus. It's unclear when Palin first tested positive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 05, 2022, 04:45:18 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on January 24, 2022, 06:07:15 AM
Yes, I think the fatalities number is also related to old Delta and then other diseases, cf. the hospitalizations share of 40%. Haven't seen any exact stats though.

The DK re-opening has received a lot of attention, debate, critique and appraisal from elsewhere. So now we have the full support of those militant Canadian truckers, for example ... The other Nordic countries are about to do the same re-openings.

Apparently infections are finally going down somewhat, as predicted, but it's still to early to establish for sure. And the numbers of people on ICUs and ventilators are now extremely low. I watched a TV programme with four of the absolutely leading experts here, and they all agreed the worst of the pandemic has been overcome.

But some negative news are: a rise in the number of fatalities (even if only ~60% of them being actually corona-caused). More babies, obviously non-vaccinated, are being hospitalized now, and this might become a trend. But about 30-40% of the generally rising corona-registered hospitalizations are not actually related to corona, and the treatment at hospitals is faster and more efficient.
Finally, there's been a change in the procedures for ICU hospitalizations since December, which might influence the lower ICU numbers. I'm unable to say, but since the  number of people on ventilators has also gone down, I suspect the effect of that change was rather modest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 05, 2022, 06:49:01 AM
Could the new COVID subvariant, BA. 2., slow our exit from the Omicron surge?

By Martin Finucane Globe Staff, Updated January 31, 2022, 4:03 p.m.

While the Omicron surge appears to be waning in some regions of the United States, some experts are cautioning that progress against the coronavirus could be hindered by the arrival of a highly contagious new Omicron subvariant, BA.2.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, former director of the US Food and Drug Administration, said Sunday that pandemic numbers were "coming down, and coming down quite sharply in parts of the Northeast, Florida, the mid-Atlantic," but said "you might see, as this new strain starts to pick up, you might see that we start to slow down in that decline."

Gottlieb said on CBS-TV's "Face the Nation" that "the decline will happen nonetheless" and he didn't expect "a huge wave of infection."

"We have so much Omicron immunity that's probably going to be a backstop against this really taking off," said Gottlieb, who is now a board member of Pfizer.

Thomas Peacock, a virologist at Imperial College London, also said in The New York Times this weekend that the arrival of BA. 2 "may mean higher peak infections in places that have yet to peak, and a slowdown in the downward trends in places that have already experienced peak Omicron."

BA.2, which is a cousin of BA.1, the original version of Omicron, has been found in more than 50 countries, including the United States, where, according to one expert's estimate last week, it already accounts for 8 percent of cases.

It is now predominant in Denmark - and researchers there have been studying it. In a preprint study released Sunday, researchers said they had found that "BA.2 is inherently substantially more transmissible than BA.1, and that it also possesses immune-evasive properties that further reduce the protective effect of vaccination against infection."

Previous preliminary research from Denmark has suggested there is no difference in the risk of hospitalization for BA.2 compared with the original Omicron variant, which causes less severe disease than the Delta variant it replaced in December.

"For public health, it is reassuring that BA.2, like BA.1, seems to be associated with favorable outcomes relative to the Delta variant, and that vaccines protect in particular against hospital admissions and severe illness," the researchers from the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), Copenhagen University, Statistics Denmark, and Technical University of Denmark, wrote in the preprint.

The researchers emphasized that "even with the emergence of BA.2, vaccines have an effect against infection, transmission and severe disease, although reduced compared to the ancestral variants."

While the spread of less-severe variants has "raised optimism," the paper said, it is "important to follow the future evolution of the BA.2 subvariant closely, as well as future emergent subvariants."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 09, 2022, 04:18:43 AM
Following the talked-about, recent DK re-opening, numbers aren't really going down these days, and unfortunately, for the first time with several family members getting positive tests. But luckily, mild cases so far.

There is a wide-spread acceptance of the new, restriction-free situation, in spite of the mostly rising numbers. The stable, very few ICU-and ventilator-cases form the most positive thing to mention, besides the potential, longer-term immunity, due to the many vaccinations and infected. Hopefully, late February will see a slow-down.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2022, 10:22:54 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 09, 2022, 04:18:43 AM
Following the talked-about, recent DK re-opening, numbers aren't really going down these days, and unfortunately, for the first time with several family members getting positive tests. But luckily, mild cases so far.

There is a wide-spread acceptance of the new, restriction-free situation, in spite of the mostly rising numbers. The stable, very few ICU-and ventilator-cases form the most positive thing to mention, besides the potential, longer-term immunity, due to the many vaccinations and infected. Hopefully, late February will see a slow-down.
Thank you for the updates; I hope that you and your family members stay healthy and don't have any bad and/or long-term issues with it.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 09, 2022, 10:30:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2022, 10:22:54 AM
Thank you for the updates; I hope that you and your family members stay healthy and don't have any bad and/or long-term issues with it.

PD

A warm + 1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 09, 2022, 11:38:57 AM
Fauci says U.S. exiting 'full-blown' pandemic; 500,000 deaths globally since omicron

By Amy Cheng, Annabelle Timsit and Brittany Shammas
Today at 3:59 a.m. EST| Updated today at 9:39 a.m. EST


The United States is exiting "the full-blown pandemic phase" of the coronavirus crisis, Anthony S. Fauci, President Biden's top medical adviser, told the Financial Times. World Health Organization officials said half a million covid-19 deaths have been tallied around the globe since the omicron variant was first detected in November.

Fauci said decisions on coronavirus restrictions will be increasingly made on a local level, "as we get out of the full-blown pandemic phase of covid-19, which we are certainly heading out of," Fauci told the newspaper. "There will also be more people making their own decisions on how they want to deal with the virus."

In the United States, covid cases declined 44 percent in the past week compared with the previous seven days, according to a Washington Post tracker, and hospitalizations related to covid-19 also declined over the same period. However, the seven-day average of deaths during the omicron surge has reached 2,600 in recent days, the highest level the country has seen in a year.

Worldwide, coronavirus deaths rose for the fifth consecutive week, with the 68,000 fatalities reported last week representing a 7 percent jump from the previous week. About 100,000 of the global deaths since omicron was detected have occurred in the United States, WHO incident manager Abdi Mahamud said Tuesday in an online Q&A session. He called the death toll "tragic" in a country with a plentiful supply of effective vaccines.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2022, 11:48:57 PM
Wonder what our *Canadian members can share regarding the truckers' strikes and blockades in Ottawa and elsewhere along the Canadian-US border?  From what I've read or heard, for example, there are a number of right-wingers who have traveled long distances to add their voices and protest--though not always about what the truck drivers are protesting (having to be vaccinated in order to do their jobs).

*or others who live close to the border and/or been impacted by the strikes

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 10, 2022, 08:36:40 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2022, 10:22:54 AM
Thank you for the updates; I hope that you and your family members stay healthy and don't have any bad and/or long-term issues with it.

PD

Thank you, so far good, though there's a lot of potential infections here ... :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 10, 2022, 08:37:29 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 09, 2022, 10:30:51 AM
A warm + 1

Thank you, that's kind of you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 10, 2022, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on February 09, 2022, 04:18:43 AM
Following the talked-about, recent DK re-opening, numbers aren't really going down these days, and unfortunately, for the first time with several family members getting positive tests. But luckily, mild cases so far.
With the actual official policy this is unavoidable. Hope for their speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 10, 2022, 02:07:03 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 09, 2022, 10:30:51 AM
A warm + 1

And an equally warm +2.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 10, 2022, 02:11:52 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 09, 2022, 11:48:57 PM
Wonder what our *Canadian members can share regarding the truckers' strikes and blockades in Ottawa and elsewhere along the Canadian-US border?  From what I've read or heard, for example, there are a number of right-wingers who have traveled long distances to add their voices and protest--though not always about what the truck drivers are protesting (having to be vaccinated in order to do their jobs).

*or others who live close to the border and/or been impacted by the strikes

PD

I'm sure this is major news in Detroit, my hometown, since the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, ON is absolutely at a standstill because of this, last I heard. And the news yesterday was that the Blue Water Bridge between Port Huron, MI and Sarnia, ON is similarly snarled. I can't give any local perspective as I no longer live in that area, but I've been paying close attention to that news for obvious reasons. I could see the Ambassador Bridge from the roof of the building where I worked for many years. This is all very sad and disturbing to me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 04:04:55 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 10, 2022, 02:11:52 PM
I'm sure this is major news in Detroit, my hometown, since the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, ON is absolutely at a standstill because of this, last I heard. And the news yesterday was that the Blue Water Bridge between Port Huron, MI and Sarnia, ON is similarly snarled. I can't give any local perspective as I no longer live in that area, but I've been paying close attention to that news for obvious reasons. I could see the Ambassador Bridge from the roof of the building where I worked for many years. This is all very sad and disturbing to me.
I echo your sentiments and have been keeping an eye on the developments.  Neat that you could see that bridge; I imagine that there was a steady stream of trucks 24-7 traveling in both directions on that bridge.  I've heard that some of the truckers are trying to take alternate routes in order to get across the border and deliver their loads.  I imagine that they then are scheduled to pick up cargo on the other side of the border too?  What a nightmare!  And what about things like produce, perhaps medicine and other time-sensitive products that can perish?  I forget the numbers (totals), but this gives folks an idea of how much trade there is between the US and Canada:  https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 04:08:35 AM
We're getting protesters in Canberra. Or so the news tells me, I'm working from home and between that and the house-move preparations I'm barely going anywhere. Apparently if I ventured to places nearer Parliament House (such as my usual office) they would be quite a bit more annoying.

Word is they're planning to target the local government's mass vaccination centre on the weekend. Yay.

And someone I went to high school with is driving back down to Canberra to join them. Yay. Finger hovering over the unfriend button in Facebook.

Similar to Canada, they're coming to the national capital to protest measures that are mostly implemented by state/provincial governments. They have a wobbly grasp of science so I shouldn't be surprised that constitutional law isn't a strong point either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 04:15:54 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 04:08:35 AM
We're getting protesters in Canberra. Or so the news tells me, I'm working from home and between that and the house-move preparations I'm barely going anywhere. Apparently if I ventured to places nearer Parliament House (such as my usual office) they would be quite a bit more annoying.

Word is they're planning to target the local government's mass vaccination centre on the weekend. Yay.

And someone I went to high school with is driving back down to Canberra to join them. Yay. Finger hovering over the unfriend button in Facebook.

Similar to Canada, they're coming to the national capital to protest measures that are mostly implemented by state/provincial governments. They have a wobbly grasp of science so I shouldn't be surprised that constitutional law isn't a strong point either.
Sorry to hear that Madiel, but, sadly, not surprised. 

How are you moving preparations going by the way?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 04:23:45 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 04:15:54 AM
How are you moving preparations going by the way?

Finished up work today, and now have 4 days (Saturday-Tuesday) to clean up enough of my crap so that the movers can move all the big stuff for me on Wednesday. I can clean out some more stuff after that if I have to, and indeed I think the genuine throwing out of stuff will probably happen afterwards.

Meanwhile, the painter has put some colour into the relentlessly neutral new house. The central living space off the kitchen is now a cosy, warm shade of green and I love it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 05:59:57 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 04:23:45 AM
Finished up work today, and now have 4 days (Saturday-Tuesday) to clean up enough of my crap so that the movers can move all the big stuff for me on Wednesday. I can clean out some more stuff after that if I have to, and indeed I think the genuine throwing out of stuff will probably happen afterwards.

Meanwhile, the painter has put some colour into the relentlessly neutral new house. The central living space off the kitchen is now a cosy, warm shade of green and I love it.
Oh, good!  It's hard enough to move let alone having some chunks of time all together, so that you can focus and get some organizing/cleaning/decluttering done.  What shade of green did you go for and does that room get a lot of light (I'm guessing that it does)?  And when do you have to be out of there by?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 11, 2022, 04:23:52 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 04:04:55 AM
I echo your sentiments and have been keeping an eye on the developments.  Neat that you could see that bridge; I imagine that there was a steady stream of trucks 24-7 traveling in both directions on that bridge.  I've heard that some of the truckers are trying to take alternate routes in order to get across the border and deliver their loads.  I imagine that they then are scheduled to pick up cargo on the other side of the border too?  What a nightmare!  And what about things like produce, perhaps medicine and other time-sensitive products that can perish?  I forget the numbers (totals), but this gives folks an idea of how much trade there is between the US and Canada:  https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html

PD

Oh, I said I could see the bridge from the roof, not the traffic going across!  ;) It was probably 10 km or so from the building, on the WSU campus, which was just north of downtown Detroit. But the few times I drove across that bridge, yes there were many trucks going across, as well as ordinary cars.

The only alternate route i can think of that is nearby would be the Detroit-Windsor tunnel that I recall was accessed from Jefferson Ave. near Cobo Hall, the major convention center in Detroit. But I think there are relatively low clearances in the tunnel so many trucks will probably not be able to cross that way. There are also a couple of ferry crossings along the St. Clair River south of Port Huron / Sarnia, but I don't know if they can handle trucks - probably not, as I think they are auto ferries only. Other than that, there are the crossings at Sault Ste. Marie and at Buffalo / Niagara Falls, but of course those are a good distance away from Detroit. Still, given that both the Ambassador and Blue Water bridges are at a complete standstill, those might be the only viable options for many truckers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 05:43:12 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 11, 2022, 05:59:57 AM
Oh, good!  It's hard enough to move let alone having some chunks of time all together, so that you can focus and get some organizing/cleaning/decluttering done.  What shade of green did you go for and does that room get a lot of light (I'm guessing that it does)?  And when do you have to be out of there by?

PD

The green is this (though really not the right impression just on a screen like this): https://www.dulux.com.au/colours/details/48718_31296

The room does not actually get that much light... though it's hard to tell in a La Nina year anyway. Plus there's a pergola in the "way".

And I have to be out of the old house by... well, by whenever I sell it. Which I want to do fairly quickly, though technically I have a year before the bank will want their money back.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 12, 2022, 02:01:30 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 11, 2022, 04:23:52 PM
Oh, I said I could see the bridge from the roof, not the traffic going across!  ;) It was probably 10 km or so from the building, on the WSU campus, which was just north of downtown Detroit. But the few times I drove across that bridge, yes there were many trucks going across, as well as ordinary cars.

The only alternate route i can think of that is nearby would be the Detroit-Windsor tunnel that I recall was accessed from Jefferson Ave. near Cobo Hall, the major convention center in Detroit. But I think there are relatively low clearances in the tunnel so many trucks will probably not be able to cross that way. There are also a couple of ferry crossings along the St. Clair River south of Port Huron / Sarnia, but I don't know if they can handle trucks - probably not, as I think they are auto ferries only. Other than that, there are the crossings at Sault Ste. Marie and at Buffalo / Niagara Falls, but of course those are a good distance away from Detroit. Still, given that both the Ambassador and Blue Water bridges are at a complete standstill, those might be the only viable options for many truckers.
Looks like things are heating up in Canada:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60356461  and in Paris they've sent in tanks to block protestors from driving into the city.

Quote from: Madiel on February 11, 2022, 05:43:12 PM
The green is this (though really not the right impression just on a screen like this): https://www.dulux.com.au/colours/details/48718_31296

The room does not actually get that much light... though it's hard to tell in a La Nina year anyway. Plus there's a pergola in the "way".

And I have to be out of the old house by... well, by whenever I sell it. Which I want to do fairly quickly, though technically I have a year before the bank will want their money back.
Ah, I was thinking that you had already sold your old house.  Good luck with that and hope that you are able to get what you ask for it.

And avocado green; I remember those days!   ;) But seriously, hope that you enjoy it and your new place!  And yes it's nice to have some pops of color in your home.  :)

To go back to thread duty, how are things going currently re protests in Canberra?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 12, 2022, 02:33:14 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 12, 2022, 02:01:30 AM
To go back to thread duty, how are things going currently re protests in Canberra?

Apparently another 10 to 15 thousand people turned up for the weekend, which led to cancellation of a couple events near where they were camping/caravanning (and they overspilled where they were supposed to be and caused damage).

They went to Parliament House today. Apparently a few went past the barricades and got in trouble, 3 arrests, but I get the impression it was mostly okay. Basically locals just stayed out of the relevant areas I think.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 12, 2022, 04:48:41 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 12, 2022, 02:33:14 AM
Apparently another 10 to 15 thousand people turned up for the weekend, which led to cancellation of a couple events near where they were camping/caravanning (and they overspilled where they were supposed to be and caused damage).

They went to Parliament House today. Apparently a few went past the barricades and got in trouble, 3 arrests, but I get the impression it was mostly okay. Basically locals just stayed out of the relevant areas I think.
Thanks for the update; I hope that it continues to be relatively peaceful.  Wonder how it's effected local businesses?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 12, 2022, 11:19:55 AM
Everybody ready for some pep talk?  :-X


Next Covid strain could kill many more, warn scientists ahead of England restrictions ending (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/12/scientists-plead-caution-covid-restrictions-lifted-england)


The idea that virus variants will continue to get milder is wrong. A new one could turn out to be even more pathogenic than the Delta variant, for example.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 12, 2022, 11:57:17 AM
Quote from: Que on February 12, 2022, 11:19:55 AM

The idea that virus variants will continue to get milder is wrong. A new one could turn out to be even more pathogenic than the Delta variant, for example.

This is unfortunately our actual situation. But many seem to be unaware of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 12, 2022, 11:59:29 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 12, 2022, 11:57:17 AM
This is unfortunately our actual situation. But many seem to be unaware of it.

I know... Or they don't want to be aware...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 12, 2022, 12:13:33 PM
It's over, guys. Get over it.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 12, 2022, 12:17:49 PM
The elephant in the room isn't the possibility of a more dangerous variant. The elephant is the number of deaths from omicron. In the UK we're on target for, let's say, 90K this year. That makes omicron a major cause of death, along with cancer, dementia and heart disease.

But no one bats an eyelid. There is hardly any debate about the question of whether it's right to accept this new scourge on society in return for a return to something close to normality. The media, the politicians, everyone - all schtum.

How has this happened? My answer is as follows: the forces of capitalism, acting in their own interests, have controlled the agenda.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 12, 2022, 12:46:44 PM
We are told, that omicron is more contagious, but gives rise to less serious disease than the earlier variants. Yet the death numbers are steadily rising in Denmark, which  at the moment has some of the highest number of omicron cases in the world pr. inhabitant. And opening the society completely makes of course the situation worse. We are told that herd immunity is just ahead of us, and this will cause the pandemy to die out, but I think it will last at least 2 -3 months more, provided we don't experience a new and more contagious variant before that, and in the mean time many elderly and vulnerable persons may have died from omicron. I agree completely with Mandryka's post above. It is the capital and the right-sided politicians. who have brought it so far.

Concerning new variants we have already seen four - one every half year - , which were able to spread worldwide in a very short time, so statistically it may soon be the time for a fifth variant to emerge. Just for the record.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 12, 2022, 12:57:38 PM
Quote from: Florestan on February 12, 2022, 12:13:33 PM
It's over, guys. Get over it.  ;D


I wish you were right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 12, 2022, 07:02:09 PM
Some of the data on omicron is suggesting death rates that are lower than for the flu. Some.

The fact is, the flu kills people all the time and it's not much of a news story. Certainly not a daily one. There is usually some amount of news about it, particularly if it's shaping up to be a bad year or just as part of the process of encouraging people to get vaccinated.

But we are not yet at the point in the social/media consciousness where a similar death rate for Covid-19 would go unremarked.

And, of course, there's no guarantee that we will avoid worse variants in the future. It's a very complex equation for the 'success' of a virus, transmissibility vs virulence. It seems a key reason why omicron is causing fewer problems is that it's actually not very good at infecting cells using the method that used to predominate, and which affects lung cells more. Instead omicron is infecting cells higher in the respiratory tract - which, as well as being better for us, might actually be a factor in making omicron more transmissible. It would actually be great for us if it was a factor, because then it's a win/win - the virus gets to be more transmissible and we get to be less damaged by it.  But yeah, we don't know if we could end up with a variant that combines the transmissibility traits with worse outcomes.

The best solution is still to get more of the world vaccinated, because it reduces the chances of a person getting infected with 2 strains at once, as that's one of the key ways that mixing and matching to create new variants can occur.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 12, 2022, 07:17:44 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 12, 2022, 07:02:09 PM
Some of the data on omicron is suggesting death rates that are lower than for the flu. Some.

The fact is, the flu kills people all the time and it's not much of a news story. Certainly not a daily one. There is usually some amount of news about it, particularly if it's shaping up to be a bad year or just as part of the process of encouraging people to get vaccinated.

But we are not yet at the point in the social/media consciousness where a similar death rate for Covid-19 would go unremarked.

And, of course, there's no guarantee that we will avoid worse variants in the future. It's a very complex equation for the 'success' of a virus, transmissibility vs virulence. It seems a key reason why omicron is causing fewer problems is that it's actually not very good at infecting cells using the method that used to predominate, and which affects lung cells more. Instead omicron is infecting cells higher in the respiratory tract - which, as well as being better for us, might actually be a factor in making omicron more transmissible. It would actually be great for us if it was a factor, because then it's a win/win - the virus gets to be more transmissible and we get to be less damaged by it.  But yeah, we don't know if we could end up with a variant that combines the transmissibility traits with worse outcomes.

The best solution is still to get more of the world vaccinated, because it reduces the chances of a person getting infected with 2 strains at once, as that's one of the key ways that mixing and matching to create new variants can occur.

Here's how things are in the UK after a couple of months of omicron


Influenza deaths
2018: 1,598
2019: 1,223

Influenza and Pneumonia deaths
2018: 29,516
2019: 26,398

The current daily covid deaths is averages at around 220. If that's maintained it will make about 80K covid deaths over the year.

I haven't done the calculation recently, but at the start of the year 15M had caught omicron, my guess is that it's now about 25M. So there's more than half the population to go and of course, immunity wanes, so there will me future waves this year - omicron or a new dominant variant.

My point is that it is not like flu, it is not like other respiratory diseases. It is more like dementia or cancer or heart disease. How did the idea that it was like flu gain popular traction? Answer - capitalist control of the media. Global capitalism needs people working and spending to grow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 13, 2022, 01:41:48 AM
I have seen one recent scientific calculation of the Omicron death rate that makes it lower than flu. I am not interested in popular ideas on the subject. Nor, to be honest, am I interested in your own back of the envelope calculations. As more data comes in, more professional assessments of that data will occur.

For one thing, your calculation assumes that all cases are Omicron. This is not correct. For example, about a month ago the data here in Australia showed that Delta was responsible for a high proportion of the serious cases, even after Omicron was circulating. "A couple of months of Omicron circulating" does not mean that for those couple of months every death is attributable to Omicron.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 13, 2022, 01:53:32 AM
I actually now think what I was said was bad logic. I'll post my latest thoughts about this, in case anyone has any feedback.


There have been about 10K deaths since omicron hit Britain December 2021. About half the population have caught it up to now, the other half will catch it in Spring. We can expect another 10K deaths in this wave. Other omicron waves could happen this year, but they will likely be less severe because there will probably be some residual immunity.

So I now think I was wrong to think that omicron is a scourge as important as heart disease or cancer. It's more like respiratory viruses - flu and pneumonia.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 13, 2022, 02:21:39 AM
My impression of latest consensus is that the deathrate of Omicron is indeed lower than that of a serious flu (it also come in variants). But this is likely to be influenced by the high vaccination rate of those who are normally at risk during a flu epidemic. However, unlike the flu, Omicron can -in some cases - still cause healthy individuals ending up in hospital.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 13, 2022, 03:11:24 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 12, 2022, 07:02:09 PM
Some of the data on omicron is suggesting death rates that are lower than for the flu. Some.

The fact is, the flu kills people all the time and it's not much of a news story. Certainly not a daily one. There is usually some amount of news about it, particularly if it's shaping up to be a bad year or just as part of the process of encouraging people to get vaccinated.

But we are not yet at the point in the social/media consciousness where a similar death rate for Covid-19 would go unremarked.

And, of course, there's no guarantee that we will avoid worse variants in the future. It's a very complex equation for the 'success' of a virus, transmissibility vs virulence. It seems a key reason why omicron is causing fewer problems is that it's actually not very good at infecting cells using the method that used to predominate, and which affects lung cells more. Instead omicron is infecting cells higher in the respiratory tract - which, as well as being better for us, might actually be a factor in making omicron more transmissible. It would actually be great for us if it was a factor, because then it's a win/win - the virus gets to be more transmissible and we get to be less damaged by it.  But yeah, we don't know if we could end up with a variant that combines the transmissibility traits with worse outcomes.

The best solution is still to get more of the world vaccinated, because it reduces the chances of a person getting infected with 2 strains at once, as that's one of the key ways that mixing and matching to create new variants can occur.

The virus is clever than the risk-deniers, for certain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 13, 2022, 03:18:23 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 12, 2022, 07:17:44 PM
How did the idea that it was like flu gain popular traction? Answer - capitalist control of the media. Global capitalism needs people working and spending to grow.


FWIW, the first I heard anything on those lines was an old friend (a Trumpkin, but let that drop at present) who told me, "Look at a Listerine bottle: we've always had Coronavirus." He's an ingrained knowitall, so it's no use tellig him he ,issed the "novel" in "novel Coronavirus," so here in the States the idea that it's no worse than the flu originated with the disgraced former president, not the "corporate media" per se.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 13, 2022, 03:58:54 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 13, 2022, 03:18:23 AM
FWIW, the first I heard anything on those lines was an old friend (a Trumpkin, but let that drop at present) who told me, "Look at a Listerine bottle: we've always had Coronavirus." He's an ingrained knowitall, so it's no use tellig him he ,issed the "novel" in "novel Coronavirus," so here in the States the idea that it's no worse than the flu originated with the disgraced former president, not the "corporate media" per se.

Chortle.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 13, 2022, 11:43:31 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 13, 2022, 03:18:23 AM
FWIW, the first I heard anything on those lines was an old friend (a Trumpkin, but let that drop at present) who told me, "Look at a Listerine bottle: we've always had Coronavirus." He's an ingrained knowitall, so it's no use tellig him he ,issed the "novel" in "novel Coronavirus," so here in the States the idea that it's no worse than the flu originated with the disgraced former president, not the "corporate media" per se.

Oh Lord. That's like saying "I like cats" while you're being mauled by a tiger.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: oldhand on February 13, 2022, 12:43:34 PM
The point being alluded to here but not yet fully presented, is all about how deaths/cases are recorded. What's prompted me is this from Madiel

QuoteSome of the data on omicron is suggesting death rates that are lower than for the flu. Some.

The fact is, the flu kills people all the time and it's not much of a news story. Certainly not a daily one. There is usually some amount of news about it, particularly if it's shaping up to be a bad year or just as part of the process of encouraging people to get vaccinated.

I read an article, before the pandemic, by a leading researcher who was trying to promote the idea of the flu jab and he based it on the idea that the flu killed far more people than official statistics suggested. His reasoning was all down to death certificates. These are usually issued by an attending doctor, in some cases the persons own GP and what he/she writes on the certificate is what's recorded. If it doesn't say 'influenza' or 'complications from influenza' it doesn't count as influenza. So the flu caused a heart attack/respiratory failure/stroke/pneumonia/etc and if this is what is written on the death certificate it becomes the official cause of death. His research suggested that the number of deaths attributable to 'flu was exponentially higher than those appearing in official censuses. There was much more information in this research but this is the crux of it.

Now look at official hospitalisation/death figures from Covid. Everyone who dies in hospital or a nursing home nowadays is tested for Covid. And it begs the question - did they die from Covid or with Covid. I suspect that many of the deaths attributed to Covid might have actually been from other causes. But, if they had Covid, that was the cause.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 13, 2022, 01:03:51 PM
When we think about the influence of a pandemic, intensity (severity) is only one of several factors and other factors such as scope (wideness) and duration should be condidered as well. If the death per capita for Omicron is 1/4 of that of Delta but its transmissibility is more than 4 times (for instance), Omicron would exert a larger influence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 13, 2022, 03:46:15 PM
Quote from: oldhand on February 13, 2022, 12:43:34 PM
The point being alluded to here but not yet fully presented, is all about how deaths/cases are recorded. What's prompted me is this from Madiel

I read an article, before the pandemic, by a leading researcher who was trying to promote the idea of the flu jab and he based it on the idea that the flu killed far more people than official statistics suggested. His reasoning was all down to death certificates. These are usually issued by an attending doctor, in some cases the persons own GP and what he/she writes on the certificate is what's recorded. If it doesn't say 'influenza' or 'complications from influenza' it doesn't count as influenza. So the flu caused a heart attack/respiratory failure/stroke/pneumonia/etc and if this is what is written on the death certificate it becomes the official cause of death. His research suggested that the number of deaths attributable to 'flu was exponentially higher than those appearing in official censuses. There was much more information in this research but this is the crux of it.

Now look at official hospitalisation/death figures from Covid. Everyone who dies in hospital or a nursing home nowadays is tested for Covid. And it begs the question - did they die from Covid or with Covid. I suspect that many of the deaths attributed to Covid might have actually been from other causes. But, if they had Covid, that was the cause.

Why exactly do you "suspect" that, apart from wishing it to be so?

If anything your own narrative is not an argument for saying Covid isn't so severe, it's an argument for saying we underappreciate the severity of influenza. And yet then you suddenly turn it around to say that Covid wasn't the actual cause of death.

If what you're trying to say is that the official Covid death toll would be less if we counted it the way we count the official influenza toll, okay. But that's a very different proposition. That's not a demonstration that Covid is actually less severe, that's just an argument is that we ought to have incorrect figures for Covid like we do for the flu.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the equation you're ignoring all the people who never got tested for Covid before dying. In some places it's considered highly likely that there was an undercount for that reason, the USA being one of them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:03:20 AM
The Romanian minister of Health announced that all the data show that in March the number of cases will plummet marking the end of the pandemic in our country. Consequently all restrictions will be ditched by the end of March with the possible exception of the mask mandate indoor. It's over.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2022, 03:31:23 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:03:20 AM
The Romanian minister of Health announced that all the data show that in March the number of cases will plummet marking the end of the pandemic in our country. Consequently all restrictions will be ditched by the end of March with the possible exception of the mask mandate indoor. It's over.

That's excellent news and I'm sure everyone is happy about it.

It probably won't mark the end of the pandemic. If he's really saying that then he's misleading. It will mark the end of the first omicron wave. There may be a second omicron wave later in the year, as immunity wanes - probably less important than the first. And there could well be new dominant variants, which present their own challenges in turn.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:45:33 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 14, 2022, 03:31:23 AM
That's excellent news and I'm sure everyone is happy about it.

Maybe not everyone, I'm sure the small but vocal bunch of lockdown-cum-restrictions fanatics and prophets of doom will be quite unhappy. ;D

QuoteIt probably won't mark the end of the pandemic. If he's really saying that then he's misleading. It will mark the end of the first omicron wave. There may be a second omicron wave later in the year, as immunity wanes - probably less important than the first. And there could well be new dominant variants, which present their own challenges in turn.

All that would file under endemic. Be it as it might, the restrictions will soon be a thing of the past.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 14, 2022, 04:25:50 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:45:33 AM
All that would file under endemic. Be it as it might, the restrictions will soon be a thing of the past.

Of course not, don't be naive. A new variant of corona may well give rise to a new pandemic in the way both the Wuhan, the alpha, the delta and the omicron did. And the risk that we get a new variant of that kind is very great.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2022, 04:38:42 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:45:33 AM
Be it as it might, the restrictions will soon be a thing of the past.

Maybe, I hope so, but I think it is wishful thinking. I think it's best to be ready for things like work from home to be implemented again, and for the cost of improving ventilation in the workplace.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 05:10:11 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 14, 2022, 04:25:50 AM
Of course not, don't be naive.

Great! If I don't believe the Romanian authorities, I'm a conspiracy theorist. If I believe them, I'm naive.  ;D

QuoteA new variant of corona may well give rise to a new pandemic in the way both the Wuhan, the alpha, the delta and the omicron did. And the risk that we get a new variant of that kind is very great.

Talk about prophets of doom...  I suppose you are utterly opposed to the lifting of restrictions in Denmark and would like to see them back in place as soon as possible.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 05:11:28 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 14, 2022, 04:38:42 AM
Maybe, I hope so, but I think it is wishful thinking. I think it's best to be ready for things like work from home to be implemented again, and for the cost of improving ventilation in the workplace.

Working from home is not a restriction and I expect it will go on where applicable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 14, 2022, 05:41:05 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 05:10:11 AM
Great! If I don't believe the Romanian authorities, I'm a conspiracy theorist. If I believe them, I'm naive.  ;D

This not about conspiracy theories, it's about lack of will to face the realities.

Quote from: Florestan
Talk about prophets of doom...  I suppose you are utterly opposed to the lifting of restrictions in Denmark and would like to see them back in place as soon as possible.  ;D

As I told you before, I am in the most vulnerable group. With the excessive number of infected people in my country now (constantly more than one out of fifteen), I'm in a very serious situation, which I haven't been the cause of myself.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 06:25:35 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 14, 2022, 05:41:05 AM
As I told you before, I am in the most vulnerable group. With the excessive number of infected people in my country now (constantly more than one out of fifteen), I'm in a very serious situation, which I haven't been the cause of myself.

Yes, I know you are at risk and hope you stay safe and sound, but let's face the reality, as you say: a country cannot go from lockdown to lockdown for years and years just because some people are more vulnerable than others. Shutting down whole sectors of the economy and annihilating the social life of all in the vain hope that nobody will die anymore of Covid is absurd. It is to be hoped that vaccination corroborated with natural immunity and early treatment will minimize the fatalities but they will never be zero. Just as with common flu, which kills millions of people every year yet it's never made into a catastrophical situation requiring exceptional measures, so with Covid: eventually we'll have to settle down to living with it and accepting a number of fatalities as unavoidable. Sooner or later we all die, Covid or not. The fact that, say, 5% are at risk of dying sooner than the other 95% is no reason to disrupt the normal life of a whole country, especially if the vaccination rate & natural immunity is high and the availability of effective early treatment is widespread..

This may sound cynical but it's just hard-fact realism. After all, death is a more natural phenomenon than life because it's not mandatory that one be born but once born one must surely die.

That being said, I reiterate my best wishes for you. Take care, stay safe!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 14, 2022, 07:40:41 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 06:25:35 AM
Yes, I know you are at risk and hope you stay safe and sound, but let's face the reality, as you say: a country cannot go from lockdown to lockdown for years and years just because some people are more vulnerable than others....

It's not just that I'm at some theoretical risk, but with the open society the corona virus has become so widespread (50.000 cases pr. day in a population of 6.000.000), that I can't avoid contracting it maybe relatively soon, because complete isolation is impossible. This is the reason why I feel, that the vulnerable group is helplessly sacrified. We are not all old and struck by dementia. Well we are vaccinated now and then, but the effect of this is dubious, and furthermore we have no really efficient drugs for treating the disease. In my country death numbers are rising (despite fewer patients at ICU), and this means, that the omicron, even if the so called experts say it only causes a milder infection, may give rise to very serious disease.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 08:29:03 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 14, 2022, 07:40:41 AM
It's not just that I'm at some theoretical risk, but with the open society the corona virus has become so widespread (50.000 cases pr. day in a population of 6.000.000), that I can't avoid contracting it maybe relatively soon, because complete isolation is impossible.

Yes, true --- but please consider this: an 85yo aunt of mine and a 75yo cousin of mine both tested positive last week. The former, which has oscillating blood pressure and irritable colon syndrome, had moderate fever for a few hours and a rather bad sore throat for 2 days; except that, nothing. The latter, which has bronchial asthma, had a temporary general weakness and some episodes of diarrhea; except that, nothing. Neither of them needed any specific treatment and are today okay, probably cured. It's obvious they had omicron. Also, a lot of my wife's work colleagues and their families as well as my best friend and his children (not his wife, though, much to her chagrin because she couldn't get a Covid Pass) had it without any serious symptoms. I know that anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all but I hope you can take some comfort from this: even if, God forbid!, you catch the omicron your chances of displaying only mild symptoms and of getting cured without any specific treatment, let alone hospitalization, are high.

QuoteThis is the reason why I feel, that the vulnerable group is helplessly sacrified.

You certainly have a point and if I were you I'd probably think the same.

QuoteWe are not all old and struck by dementia.

Of course not and it's all the more reason to hope for the better in the unfortunate case of getting Covid. I don't know how old are you but judging by what happens in Romania even with old people, you shouldn't worry too much --- which is not to say you shouldn't worry at all.

QuoteIn my country death numbers are rising (despite fewer patients at ICU), and this means, that the omicron, even if the so called experts say it only causes a milder infection, may give rise to very serious disease.

I told you only what I've seen with my own eyes or heard from completely trustful sources and which all converge towards this: omicron is indeed milder and much less life-threatening than delta even for many of the elderly. The children and the healthy have abolutely no reason to fear it.

So bottom line, I'd say by all means, be cautious and take all the measures within your reach and power to avoid infection but don't live your life in constant and permanent fear and panic. Such a state might damage you in worse ways than omicron.

Anyway, I'd like to add you to my prayers from now on, if you don't mind. I believe your name is Poul, am I mistaken?

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 14, 2022, 09:45:50 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 08:29:03 AM
Yes, true --- but please consider this: an 85yo aunt of mine and a 75yo cousin of mine both tested positive last week. The former, which has oscillating blood pressure and irritable colon syndrome, had moderate fever for a few hours and a rather bad sore throat for 2 days; except that, nothing. The latter, which has bronchial asthma, had a temporary general weakness and some episodes of diarrhea; except that, nothing. Neither of them needed any specific treatment and are today okay, probably cured. It's obvious they had omicron. Also, a lot of my wife's work colleagues and their families as well as my best friend and his children (not his wife, though, much to her chagrin because she couldn't get a Covid Pass) had it without any serious symptoms. I know that anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all but I hope you can take some comfort from this: even if, God forbid!, you catch the omicron your chances of displaying only mild symptoms and of getting cured without any specific treatment, let alone hospitalization, are high.

You certainly have a point and if I were you I'd probably think the same.

Of course not and it's all the more reason to hope for the better in the unfortunate case of getting Covid. I don't know how old are you but judging by what happens in Romania even with old people, you shouldn't worry too much --- which is not to say you shouldn't worry at all.

I told you only what I've seen with my own eyes or heard from completely trustful sources and which all converge towards this: omicron is indeed milder and much less life-threatening than delta even for many of the elderly. The children and the healthy have abolutely no reason to fear it.

So bottom line, I'd say by all means, be cautious and take all the measures within your reach and power to avoid infection but don't live your life in constant and permanent fear and panic. Such a state might damage you in worse ways than omicron.

Anyway, I'd like to add you to my prayers from now on, if you don't mind. I believe your name is Poul, am I mistaken?



My mother, in her 80s also contracted it, but luckily it struck her only as the equivalent of a mild cold (the old garden-variety Coronavirus, I suppose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 10:01:03 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 14, 2022, 09:45:50 AM
My mother, in her 80s also contracted it, but luckily it struck her only as the equivalent of a mild cold (the old garden-variety Coronavirus, I suppose.

Praise the Lord! May all GMGers past, present and future as well as all their loved ones stay safe!


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Johnnie Burgess on February 14, 2022, 03:18:48 PM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 05:11:28 AM
Working from home is not a restriction and I expect it will go on where applicable.

I work in a call center.  There is no talk of bringing them back to the office.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 14, 2022, 10:43:02 PM

"Next Covid strain could kill many more, warn scientists ahead of England restrictions ending"

There's that word again - 'COULD'. No proof, simple speculation by media based on spurious history and flawed science. Along with it's siblings, MIGHT, POSSIBLY, PREDICTED, etc -  any headline that contains any of these words I now simply dismiss. All they do is raise fear levels, encourage conspiracy theorists and sell media time which is money of course. Data is nearly always far more reliable than anecdotal 'evidence'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: The new erato on February 14, 2022, 11:30:57 PM
Indeed. There are many might be's and no need to speculate. I could name a number of treats that are more scary and perhaps more probable. Multi resistant bacteria anybody?

Edited for fat fingers on a small phone. 😀
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 14, 2022, 11:52:25 PM
Quote from: The new erato on February 14, 2022, 11:30:57 PM
Indeed. There are many might be's and no need to speculate. I could name a number of treats that are more scary and perhaps more orobable. Multi resistans bacteria anybody?

Indeed.

(I like orobable - sort of thing a cartoon pirate might say.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 15, 2022, 12:00:25 AM
Quote from: Johnnie Burgess on February 14, 2022, 03:18:48 PM
I work in a call center.  There is no talk of bringing them back to the office.

I'm quite surprised at that. There is a huge amount of money invested in city centre realty, I don't think any government can afford to let it go.

But employers are no doubt keen to encourage work from home in industries like call centres because they're saving the cost of office space, and they can use technology now to monitor exactly what their staff are up to, so they can micromanage remotely. There's also evidence to say that workers work more hours when they're working from home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 15, 2022, 12:45:37 AM
Quote from: Holden on February 14, 2022, 10:43:02 PM
"Next Covid strain could kill many more, warn scientists ahead of England restrictions ending"


There's that word again - 'COULD'. No proof, simple speculation by media based on spurious history and flawed science. Along with it's siblings, MIGHT, POSSIBLY, PREDICTED, etc -  any headline that contains any of these words I now simply dismiss. All they do is raise fear levels, encourage conspiracy theorists and sell media time which is money of course.

+ 1.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on February 15, 2022, 02:46:34 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 14, 2022, 03:03:20 AM
The Romanian minister of Health announced that all the data show that in March the number of cases will plummet marking the end of the pandemic in our country. Consequently all restrictions will be ditched by the end of March with the possible exception of the mask mandate indoor. It's over.

It is looking like the pandemic is finally ending before our eyes, but I don't lick before it drops. I thought a year ago the pandemic will be over by fall 2021 thanks to the vaccines, but the delta variant (and somewhat larger vaccine hesitancy than expected) provided us with a nasty plot twist.

Bad things last a long time. Good things are over fast. That's life and it sucks...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Johnnie Burgess on February 15, 2022, 03:51:04 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 15, 2022, 12:00:25 AM
I'm quite surprised at that. There is a huge amount of money invested in city centre realty, I don't think any government can afford to let it go.

But employers are no doubt keen to encourage work from home in industries like call centres because they're saving the cost of office space, and they can use technology now to monitor exactly what their staff are up to, so they can micromanage remotely. There's also evidence to say that workers work more hours when they're working from home.

The company I work for is not leaving the building.  The city will still get its property taxes.  Attendance has been better. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 15, 2022, 04:26:45 AM
There has been much discussion about how some office space might get converted to residential.

The whole notion that you work in a significantly different place to where you live is a relatively recent invention, even though WE are pretty used to it. But it does lead to city centres that aren't designed for actually living in and have businesses geared entirely to the daytime rhythm.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 15, 2022, 06:06:27 AM
Quote from: Johnnie Burgess on February 15, 2022, 03:51:04 AM
The company I work for is not leaving the building.  The city will still get its property taxes.  Attendance has been better.

That's interesting -- why are they keeping the building if they don't need it for the staff to work in?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on February 15, 2022, 06:17:24 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 15, 2022, 06:06:27 AM
That's interesting -- why are they keeping the building if they don't need it for the staff to work in?
I'm a bit sceptical of the whole "homeworking revolution".

At least here in Spain, when you hear commentators talk about the issue, you'd believe that everyone lives in a 5.000 sq. ft. flat or house, with a separate working area for each member of the household. The reality, though, is that a large majority of workers live in an 800 sq. ft. flat: husband, wife, two children, the unmarried uncle, the widowed grandmother, and the dog (or whatever family structures you may have). And many employees are desperate to get back to the office in those circumstances.

Thus, homeworking is not as comfortable and practical as is being told to us, not for the employee, and also not for the employer: many interactions within and between teams, training issues, etc. become very cumbersome when done remotely.

The trend is for companies to keep office space, but focus on high quality and efficiency. A mixed work model (2 days at home, 3 in the office, for instance) is taking hold.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 15, 2022, 06:23:15 AM
Quote from: ritter on February 15, 2022, 06:17:24 AM
I'm a bit sceptical of the whole "homeworking revolution".

At least here in Spain, when you hear commentators talk about the issue, you'd believe that everyone lives in a 5.000 sq. ft. flat or house, with a separate working area for each member of the household. The reality, though, is that a large majority of workers live in an 800 sq. ft. flat: husband, wife, two children, the unmarried uncle, the widowed grandmother, and the dog (or whatever family structures you may have). And many employees are desperate to get back to the office in those circumstances.

Thus, homeworking is not as comfortable and practical as is being told to us, not for the employee, and also not for the employer: many interactions within and between teams, training issues, etc. become very cumbersome when done remotely.

The trend is for companies to keep office space, but focus on high quality and efficiency. A mixed work model (2 days at home, 3 in the office, for instance) is taking hold.

That hybrid model is now in use by my pre-stroke employer. For us admin/support staff who earn rather less than the portfolio managers and industry analysts, working from home is indeed more stressful and invasive.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Johnnie Burgess on February 15, 2022, 08:10:21 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on February 15, 2022, 06:06:27 AM
That's interesting -- why are they keeping the building if they don't need it for the staff to work in?

Not all work from home, I do not.  And it seems for training it is better to do on site.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 15, 2022, 08:43:43 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 14, 2022, 09:45:50 AM
My mother, in her 80s also contracted it, but luckily it struck her only as the equivalent of a mild cold (the old garden-variety Coronavirus, I suppose.
This has been the case for friends and family. Even for my mom, being unvaccinated, it wasn't worse than the flu. Omicron is pretty weak.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 15, 2022, 10:45:47 PM
Quote from: greg on February 15, 2022, 08:43:43 PM
This has been the case for friends and family. Even for my mom, being unvaccinated, it wasn't worse than the flu. Omicron is pretty weak.

We all got lucky when Omicron turned out to be much milder than Delta, but particularly the unvaccinated.

Yet it does send the wrong, reassuring message: you don't need to be vaccinated.  Might not work out so well if there is a next time... which hopefully won't come!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 06:27:06 AM
Quote from: greg on February 15, 2022, 08:43:43 PM
This has been the case for friends and family. Even for my mom, being unvaccinated, it wasn't worse than the flu. Omicron is pretty weak.

Very glad about your mom.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on February 16, 2022, 06:49:21 AM
Self-tests suffer from a lack of efficiency data everywhere, in spite of being massively on the market.

A new test here of 46 labels shows surprising differences in results - spanning from 2.5% to 94%. Generally, tests based on spit were very bad, and an efficiency above 90% is recommended. Plus: PCR tests, but not tested here, are still considered the better option.

In Europe, a 'C' mark on the packet only means that the production itself is regular, it does not tell about any minimum level of efficiency.

Click on 'overall clinical sensitivity'
https://www.hvidovrehospital.dk/presse-og-nyt/pressemeddelelser-og-nyheder/nyheder-fra-hvidovre-hospital/Sider/Antigentests-svinger-voldsomt-i-kvalitet.aspx

The labels listed - a PDF link: https://www.hvidovrehospital.dk/presse-og-nyt/pressemeddelelser-og-nyheder/nyheder-fra-hvidovre-hospital/Documents/graf-antigentests.pdf

Big version in English https://www.hvidovrehospital.dk/presse-og-nyt/pressemeddelelser-og-nyheder/nyheder-fra-hvidovre-hospital/PublishingImages/Sider/Antigentests-svinger-voldsomt-i-kvalitet/A%20nationwide%20analytical%20and%20clinical%20evaluation%20of%2046%20rapid%20antigen%20tests%20for%20SARS-CoV-.pdf
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 16, 2022, 08:43:38 AM
Quote from: Holden on February 14, 2022, 10:43:02 PM
"Next Covid strain could kill many more, warn scientists ahead of England restrictions ending"

There's that word again - 'COULD'. No proof, simple speculation by media based on spurious history and flawed science. Along with it's siblings, MIGHT, POSSIBLY, PREDICTED, etc -  any headline that contains any of these words I now simply dismiss. All they do is raise fear levels, encourage conspiracy theorists and sell media time which is money of course. Data is nearly always far more reliable than anecdotal 'evidence'.

Quote from: The new erato on February 14, 2022, 11:30:57 PM
Indeed. There are many might be's and no need to speculate. I could name a number of treats that are more scary and perhaps more probable. Multi resistant bacteria anybody?

"Could" as in: a clear possibility. Neither a certainty, nor a speculation.

What to Expect From the Variants to Come How Omicron and earlier strains evolved doesn't bode well for what's next. (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/02/what-to-expect-from-future-covid-variants.html)

Omicron, though far more infectious than the variants that preceded it, has proven to be somewhat less deadly on a case-for-case basis. Assuming that trend continues, SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, is in the process of evolving into a relatively symbiotic companion to the human species.

But that idea is a fantasy, say virologists who study the disease closely. "We're not going to see that," says Ravindra Gupta, a microbiologist at the University of Cambridge in the U.K. "It's factually wrong." Variants will keep coming, and we have no reason to expect that they'll be less virulent. They could well be both more transmissible and more deadly than anything we've seen so far.


Sensationalism by scientists?  ::) 

I guess in this era of "relative truths", anything is possible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 16, 2022, 09:04:11 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 16, 2022, 06:27:06 AM
Very glad about your mom.
Thanks, same about yours.
She only got it from being desperate to sing in church after a really long time (at that point knew about the weakness of Omicron, so must have felt the risk was worth it).
But until that time was no-lifeing, staying away from others and taking every precaution imaginable the entire time, never getting the virus at all. Pretty extreme and not doable for most people, but some can pull it off.



Quote from: Que on February 15, 2022, 10:45:47 PM
Yet it does send the wrong, reassuring message: you don't need to be vaccinated.  Might not work out so well if there is a next time... which hopefully won't come!
In general, for the majority of people, vaccination is the better option. It's not one size fits all, though. And as for the message that is being sent, people should be relying on their own (fact-based) judgement more than whatever messages are being sent by people discussing it online- the burden of responsibility is on them to make their own decisions, rather than the burden of randos online to be providing good messages. Which  seems to be a source of disagreement nowadays.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on February 16, 2022, 09:12:35 AM
Quote from: greg on February 16, 2022, 09:04:11 AM
In general, for the majority of people, vaccination is the better option. It's not one size fits all, though. And as for the message that is being sent, people should be relying on their own (fact-based) judgement more than whatever messages are being sent by people discussing it online- the burden of responsibility is on them to make their own decisions, rather than the burden of randos online to be providing good messages. Which  seems to be a source of disagreement nowadays.

You are buying into the popular fantasy that the general public knows and understands everything and does not have to rely on more informed expert advice.

Economy, international law, medical sciences, natural sciences? We all understand and know so much better than these so called experts!   8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 09:53:38 AM
Quote from: Que on February 16, 2022, 08:43:38 AM
Sensationalism by scientists?  ::) 

I guess in this era of "relative truths", anything is possible.


And doctors who don't give us the Happy Talk we want are "doom-sayers."
Quote from: Que on February 16, 2022, 09:12:35 AM
You are buying into the popular fantasy that the general public knows and understands everything and does not have to rely on more informed expert advice.

[snip]

At times, greg does seem heavily invested in that fantasy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on February 16, 2022, 10:08:31 AM
Quote from: Que on February 16, 2022, 08:43:38 AM
"Could" as in: a clear possibility. Neither a certainty, nor a speculation.

What to Expect From the Variants to Come How Omicron and earlier strains evolved doesn't bode well for what's next. (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/02/what-to-expect-from-future-covid-variants.html)

Omicron, though far more infectious than the variants that preceded it, has proven to be somewhat less deadly on a case-for-case basis. Assuming that trend continues, SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, is in the process of evolving into a relatively symbiotic companion to the human species.

But that idea is a fantasy, say virologists who study the disease closely. "We're not going to see that," says Ravindra Gupta, a microbiologist at the University of Cambridge in the U.K. "It's factually wrong." Variants will keep coming, and we have no reason to expect that they'll be less virulent. They could well be both more transmissible and more deadly than anything we've seen so far.


Sensationalism by scientists?  ::) 

I guess in this era of "relative truths", anything is possible.

This comment from Wendy Barclay, who's a Professor of Virology at Imperial College London, is relevant here. At  about 1.01.30 in the video

QuoteThe big unknown for people like me at the moment is, how will the virus go next and is antigenic escape necessarily driving milder infection, or will the next solution for the virus be a different combination, perhaps antigenic escape and a severe infection? We can't exclude that at the moment because we don't understand why omicron has changed its behaviour in the way it has. Is it a necessary consequence for the virus, this change in antigenic characteristics, or not. Can they be uncoupled? That's intense research, big questions. There are a number of other worrying things out there, we've seen the virus hop back into certain animal species, from where it could always re-emerge in the future.. . and there's some evidence that chronically infected people incubate these viruses for a long time and give rise to these new variants, there are many many thousands of these people around the world. I don't think that this is the last variant we'll see. I don't know at the moment what the characteristics of the next variant will be. I think that if we continue to see this trend in downward severity after another one or two variants I will feel a lot more comfortable in saying, yes, let's relax.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQoxwJWqlP0&t=3708s&ab_channel=ZOE
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 16, 2022, 11:02:56 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 16, 2022, 09:53:38 AM
And doctors who don't give us the Happy Talk we want are "doom-sayers."
At times, greg does seem heavily invested in that fantasy.

Talking about Asians on the other thread, how is the Boston mayor doing administratively and politically on this matter and other issues?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 11:11:04 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 16, 2022, 11:02:56 AM
Talking about Asians on the other thread, how is the Boston mayor doing administratively and politically on this matter and other issues?

Even in Boston (we might say) there are a lot of people who are more inclined to push back, and to be less civil about it, with a mayor who is an Asian-American woman. She's handling herself well. She may have a future.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 16, 2022, 12:34:20 PM
Quote from: Que on February 16, 2022, 09:12:35 AM
You are buying into the popular fantasy that the general public knows and understands everything and does not have to rely on more informed expert advice.

Economy, international law, medical sciences, natural sciences? We all understand and know so much better than these so called experts!   8)
No, that's not my position at all.
My position is that people have different bodies and (hopefully) have the wisdom to make the correct decision for themselves (of course, there are plenty that don't). Mandates are like forcing everyone to wear the same size clothing. There might be an average that is perfect for many, true, but there is no one size fits all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 16, 2022, 12:46:03 PM
Quote from: Que on February 16, 2022, 08:43:38 AM
"Could" as in: a clear possibility. Neither a certainty, nor a speculation.

What to Expect From the Variants to Come How Omicron and earlier strains evolved doesn't bode well for what's next. (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/02/what-to-expect-from-future-covid-variants.html)

Omicron, though far more infectious than the variants that preceded it, has proven to be somewhat less deadly on a case-for-case basis. Assuming that trend continues, SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, is in the process of evolving into a relatively symbiotic companion to the human species.

But that idea is a fantasy, say virologists who study the disease closely. "We're not going to see that," says Ravindra Gupta, a microbiologist at the University of Cambridge in the U.K. "It's factually wrong." Variants will keep coming, and we have no reason to expect that they'll be less virulent. They could well be both more transmissible and more deadly than anything we've seen so far.


Sensationalism by scientists?  ::) 

I guess in this era of "relative truths", anything is possible.

clear possibility? Is it fact, does it have a solid basis in fact?

Speculate: verb
1. form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence.


Anecdotal evidence is not fact, (especially if it's historical).

QuoteThey could well be both more transmissible and more deadly than anything we've seen so far.
and they could well be the opposite as well. A pound each way? You don't need to be a scientist to make two statements that contradict each other at almost the same time. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 16, 2022, 01:14:01 PM
Quote from: Holden on February 16, 2022, 12:46:03 PM
clear possibility? Is it fact, does it have a solid basis in fact?

Speculate: verb
1. form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence.


Anecdotal evidence is not fact, (especially if it's historical).
  and they could well be the opposite as well. A pound each way? You don't need to be a scientist to make two statements that contradict each other at almost the same time.

This is psoudoargumentation. From experience (and this is not anectodical) we know that mutations will come and some of them will be less virulent and some of them will be more virulent. It's only a question of time before a more virulent variant emerges. If you think otherwise, you are deluding yourself. But you are right, we don't need experts to tell us this, which is indeed evident.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 01:20:01 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on February 16, 2022, 01:14:01 PM
This is psoudoargumentation. From experience (and this is not anectodical) we know that mutations will come and some of them will be less virulent and some of them will be more virulent. It's only a question of time before a more virulent variant emerges. If you think otherwise, you are deluding yourself. But you are right, we don't need experts to tell us this, which is indeed evident.

And, to repeat what we've all known for months now, COVID-19 is a virulent novel mutation of what had been the unremarkable coronavirus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 16, 2022, 01:43:35 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 16, 2022, 11:11:04 AM
Even in Boston (we might say) there are a lot of people who are more inclined to push back, and to be less civil about it, with a mayor who is an Asian-American woman. She's handling herself well. She may have a future.

Sounds like she is a pragmatic politician rather than purist ideologue. For such people (most politicians), politics determines policy rather than policy determining politics.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 04:05:37 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 16, 2022, 01:43:35 PM
Sounds like she is a pragmatic politician rather than purist ideologue. For such people (most politicians), politics determines policy rather than policy determining politics.

Just so.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 16, 2022, 04:56:04 PM
In an earlier post I intimated that Covid deaths included those who died from the virus and those who had Covid but died from other causes. A couple of posters queried this especially as any evidence I had at the time was purely anecdotal and from my own experiences. Now this from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and also Queensland's Chief Health Officer. This from the 'Brisbane Times' today

QuoteThe ABS data was up to January 31 and included 2639 deaths nation-wide, including people who died from the disease and others who had died from different causes while also testing positive for COVID-19.

Queensland CHO John Gerrard has emphasised the distinction at recent media conferences, saying the increasing complexity of cases meant
Quotesome deaths were "from" COVID while other people infected with coronavirus had died of other causes.

The other interesting stat concerns who is now dying from Covid and why

QuoteThe Australian Bureau of Statistics' report found that, on average, a person who died from COVID-19 also had 2.7 other illnesses at their time of death. I saw this disease overseas in 2021. These were young people getting classic viral pneumonia and dying," Dr Gerrard said. "What we're seeing now is very different – you're seeing older people with multiple medical problems, and often it's difficult to determine to what extent the virus has played a role in their death.

Of course, this is here in Australia, but we're finally getting some transparent demographic data to show what is actually happening. If this had been done right at the start then a more focused approach could have been adopted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 16, 2022, 05:11:19 PM
Is anyone talking as if the number of coronavirus fatalities is no longer a concern, or even negligible?

The coronavirus is here to stay. We now have a tool kit to live with it.

By Carolyn Y. Johnson and Aaron Steckelberg
Feb. 15, 2022

When the pandemic began, the medical tool box was empty. There were no coronavirus vaccines, no treatments, not even tests to tell who was infected and who was not.

For the past two years, scientists and doctors have been building and expanding an arsenal. None of these tools are silver bullets. They can't eliminate the coronavirus. But together, they can help turn the virus into a manageable risk, allowing people to hug relatives, go to the movies and travel without fear.

Deaths from covid-19 still have a long way to drop before the crisis of the pandemic recedes. But most experts believe that as immunity is broadened through vaccination and waves of infection, covid-19 will eventually blend into the other illnesses that are part of the daily background of respiratory disease.

That doesn't mean the virus becomes harmless. Every year, respiratory diseases cause tens of thousands of hospitalizations and deaths. Precisely how much covid-19 contributes to that suffering remains to be seen.

What is certain is that the world needs to prepare the tools now to help control future waves and iterations of the virus and reduce their harm: vaccinations, antiviral pills, and other treatments and preventive measures.

"We're looking forward, as I think everyone feels is appropriate, that ultimately ... we're going to have to 'live' with something that will not be eradicated and very likely would not be eliminated," Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said at a coronavirus task force briefing.

One model for how to move forward comes from HIV. There isn't a vaccine, but a slew of treatments and prevention strategies means infected people with access to health care can live nearly normal life spans with the right support and access to medicine. In the case of the coronavirus, scientists hope to build a medical tool kit stacked with vaccines, boosters, pills, monoclonal antibodies and other countermeasures that will provide layers of protection and defense, helping tame the pandemic.

"For HIV, we have a plethora of stuff, because we haven't been able to have a vaccine," said Larry Corey, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. "Here, we may have a vaccine, but we still may need a plethora of stuff.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 17, 2022, 12:22:52 PM
Quote from: greg on February 16, 2022, 12:34:20 PM
No, that's not my position at all.
My position is that people have different bodies and (hopefully) have the wisdom to make the correct decision for themselves (of course, there are plenty that don't). Mandates are like forcing everyone to wear the same size clothing. There might be an average that is perfect for many, true, but there is no one size fits all.

That "hopefully" in brackets is a huge issue. Your position makes theoretical sense, but doesn't work because it presupposes a kind of knowledge that people do NOT have. How many people ACTUALLY know enough about their immune system to make an informed choice?

Nearly zero. I'm not talking about people who believe they can "boost" their immune system with vitamins or zinc or something that's actually dangerous rather than pointless. People who actually know enough about their own individual immune system, one of the most complex things in the human body, to make an informed choice as to where they sit on the statistical probabilities? That's almost nobody. That's ONLY people who have previous experience of an unusual issue that gave them specific information.

The problem is, in some parts of the world there are far too many people who BELIEVE they know way more about their own immune system in ways that would make a scientist double over with laughter if it wasn't goddamn serious. A steady diet of wellness industry junk science designed to sell you stuff has people believing they have total control over bodily functions they haven't a clue about.

Making the "correct decision" isn't based on wisdom. It's dumb luck. It's the same dumb luck that means most people who decide not to wear a seatbelt on a car trip won't die. It doesn't mean not getting vaccinated was a wise decision, it just means people played a round of Russian roulette and didn't lose. But they will BELIEVE they made a smart informed decision because the result was okay, in a shocking case of post hoc ergo propter hoc thinking.

Not getting vaccinated is not a wise, informed choice unless you have specific knowledge of a medical condition that makes vaccination a bad idea. Tell your Mum.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on February 17, 2022, 12:54:36 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 17, 2022, 12:22:52 PM

Nearly zero. I'm not talking about people who believe they can "boost" their immune system with vitamins or zinc or something that's actually dangerous rather than pointless. People who actually know enough about their own individual immune system, one of the most complex things in the human body, to make an informed choice as to where they sit on the statistical probabilities? That's almost nobody. That's ONLY people who have previous experience of an unusual issue that gave them specific information.

The problem is, in some parts of the world there are far too many people who BELIEVE they know way more about their own immune system in ways that would make a scientist double over with laughter if it wasn't goddamn serious. A steady diet of wellness industry junk science designed to sell you stuff has people believing they have total control over bodily functions they haven't a clue about.

Making the "correct decision" isn't based on wisdom. It's dumb luck. It's the same dumb luck that means most people who decide not to wear a seatbelt on a car trip won't die. It doesn't mean not getting vaccinated was a wise decision, it just means people played a round of Russian roulette and didn't lose. But they will BELIEVE they made a smart informed decision because the result was okay, in a shocking case of post hoc ergo propter hoc thinking.

Not getting vaccinated is not a wise, informed choice unless you have specific knowledge of a medical condition that makes vaccination a bad idea. Tell your Mum.

Excellent post.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 17, 2022, 07:11:05 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 17, 2022, 12:22:52 PM
That "hopefully" in brackets is a huge issue. Your position makes theoretical sense, but doesn't work because it presupposes a kind of knowledge that people do NOT have. How many people ACTUALLY know enough about their immune system to make an informed choice?

Nearly zero. I'm not talking about people who believe they can "boost" their immune system with vitamins or zinc or something that's actually dangerous rather than pointless. People who actually know enough about their own individual immune system, one of the most complex things in the human body, to make an informed choice as to where they sit on the statistical probabilities? That's almost nobody. That's ONLY people who have previous experience of an unusual issue that gave them specific information.

The problem is, in some parts of the world there are far too many people who BELIEVE they know way more about their own immune system in ways that would make a scientist double over with laughter if it wasn't goddamn serious. A steady diet of wellness industry junk science designed to sell you stuff has people believing they have total control over bodily functions they haven't a clue about.

Making the "correct decision" isn't based on wisdom. It's dumb luck. It's the same dumb luck that means most people who decide not to wear a seatbelt on a car trip won't die. It doesn't mean not getting vaccinated was a wise decision, it just means people played a round of Russian roulette and didn't lose. But they will BELIEVE they made a smart informed decision because the result was okay, in a shocking case of post hoc ergo propter hoc thinking.

Not getting vaccinated is not a wise, informed choice unless you have specific knowledge of a medical condition that makes vaccination a bad idea. Tell your Mum.
I think you are talking about something slightly different....
no mention of long-term effects we have yet to see- if you had mentioned that alongside your point that there is so much about the body that we don't know, that just points to the validity in the choice of not taking it, to eliminate risks involved in that.

And people can make educated guesses for the short-term by going to a doctor for advice, you didn't mention that either.

What is your point? You are saying this because you support mandates? Mandates would override doctor suggestions, and one's autonomy to roll the dice on their own life. Which brings me to the third thing you missed, people can choose to avoid people for years. People can be safe and never get it for years (just like me). Mandates completely disregard that, it's very disrespectful when people can be responsible, causing no harm to themselves or anyone, and then still be forced to get the shot. The risk of long-term effects from the shot if you don't get it: 0%. The risk if you do: unlikely, but above 0%.

btw if you support mandates, every bad decision doesn't need to be illegal, you aren't everyone's parent lol.

and no, won't tell my Mom because she has certain unusual health issues which, who knows how the shot would interact with that- so avoiding people until the virus was mild was a completely successful strategy, end of story. And the government, or you, or whoever, or me (if I were in power) don't have the right to forcefully make her decisions for her, same as for anyone else.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 18, 2022, 04:20:21 PM
What I'm saying has nothing to do with mandates. Canberra is reportedly one of the most vaccinated places in the world. No mandates involved. We don't need one here because culturally people in Canberra understand why vaccination is recommended and don't believe in creating doubts and conspiracies for the sake of it.

Meanwhile, you try to claim that we don't know enough about vaccination after 250 years and it's not worth the risk? Spare me. We understand how vaccination works. We understand how to test vaccines before they're available to the general public.

Well I understand enough about those things anyway. Not so sure about you.

As for advice from doctors, the medical profession as a whole says again and again, people should be vaccinated. What's the best defence we have against this virus? Vaccination. Over and over. With the exception of the occasional person who has a SPECIFIC reason, most people should get vaccinated. That's what I'm saying. A general fear of the unknown is not a specific reason.

Heading into the mindset of wanting every answer to every question is not a reason, because you don't generally go through life that way. I understand enough about the science to get the basic principles, and then the rest is listening to expertise because I don't have the time or the resources to develop my own personal treatment. And neither does any individual.

The mandates I'm aware of include exceptions for the very small percentage of people who are genuinely unable to get vaccinated and who have concrete advice from a doctor to that effect. But we aren't talking about that. We're talking about all the people who won't get vaccinated because of their incoherent fears.

And it's BECAUSE of people like that that mandates even exist. You're fixated on mandates. I'm not. In places where vaccines are readily available, if people are stupid enough to not make use of them, all I want is for those people to stay the hell away from me. But in a city wher over 98% of people over the age of 12 are vaccinated, it's a non-issue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.





Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 08:17:05 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 17, 2022, 12:22:52 PM
How many people ACTUALLY know enough about their immune system to make an informed choice?

Nearly zero.

True.

Now, how many experts ACTUALLY know enough about the immune system of a particular person to make an informed recommendation?

Nearly zero.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 19, 2022, 08:39:25 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.







Mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 08:43:14 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 19, 2022, 08:39:25 AM
Mend quickly!

Thanks, Karl. I'm three-quarter mended already.

I tend to think it was not omicron because it lasted longer and had more symptoms than my cousin's officially confirmed Covid-19. In all probability it was just plain, good ol' flu.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on February 19, 2022, 09:17:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.
Glad you're feeling better, Andrei. And receive my condolences for your  father-in-law.

Un fuerte abrazo,

Rafael

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 09:25:40 AM
Quote from: ritter on February 19, 2022, 09:17:07 AM
Glad you're feeling better, Andrei. And receive my condolences for father-in-law.

Un fuerte abrazo,

Rafael

Thank you, don Rafael, much appreciated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 11:07:38 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 17, 2022, 12:22:52 PM
That "hopefully" in brackets is a huge issue. Your position makes theoretical sense, but doesn't work because it presupposes a kind of knowledge that people do NOT have. How many people ACTUALLY know enough about their immune system to make an informed choice?

Nearly zero. I'm not talking about people who believe they can "boost" their immune system with vitamins or zinc or something that's actually dangerous rather than pointless. People who actually know enough about their own individual immune system, one of the most complex things in the human body, to make an informed choice as to where they sit on the statistical probabilities? That's almost nobody. That's ONLY people who have previous experience of an unusual issue that gave them specific information.

The problem is, in some parts of the world there are far too many people who BELIEVE they know way more about their own immune system in ways that would make a scientist double over with laughter if it wasn't goddamn serious. A steady diet of wellness industry junk science designed to sell you stuff has people believing they have total control over bodily functions they haven't a clue about.

Making the "correct decision" isn't based on wisdom. It's dumb luck. It's the same dumb luck that means most people who decide not to wear a seatbelt on a car trip won't die. It doesn't mean not getting vaccinated was a wise decision, it just means people played a round of Russian roulette and didn't lose. But they will BELIEVE they made a smart informed decision because the result was okay, in a shocking case of post hoc ergo propter hoc thinking.

Not getting vaccinated is not a wise, informed choice unless you have specific knowledge of a medical condition that makes vaccination a bad idea. Tell your Mum.

Hear, hear!

My retired nurse friend who lives in northern Michigan continues to send me Jimmy Dore videos that extol the dangers of vaccines, and other videos purporting to reveal "interesting" facts such as that the vaccinated outnumber the unvaccinated among hospitalized cases in Australia - I'm not sure this is true, but if the vaccination rate is as high as has been quoted (94.2%) then there would be nothing surprising about it since beyond a certain point, the sheer size of the vaccinated population is going to outweigh the greater vulnerability of being immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., if the vaccination rate were 100%, then 100% of hospitalizations would be of vaccinated people).

Many people who refuse vaccination believe they are making an informed choice... but unfortunately much of the "information" they are relying on is flawed or outright false.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 19, 2022, 11:33:07 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 08:17:05 AM
True.

Now, how many experts ACTUALLY know enough about the immune system of a particular person to make an informed recommendation?

Nearly zero.

Also true. Which is why that isn't the basis of recommendations to the population.

My condolences for your loss.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 19, 2022, 11:36:36 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 11:07:38 AM
Hear, hear!

My retired nurse friend who lives in northern Michigan continues to send me Jimmy Dore videos that extol the dangers of vaccines, and other videos purporting to reveal "interesting" facts such as that the vaccinated outnumber the unvaccinated among hospitalized cases in Australia - I'm not sure this is true, but if the vaccination rate is as high as has been quoted (94.2%) then there would be nothing surprising about it since beyond a certain point, the sheer size of the vaccinated population is going to outweigh the greater vulnerability of being immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., if the vaccination rate were 100%, then 100% of hospitalizations would be of vaccinated people).

Many people who refuse vaccination believe they are making an informed choice... but unfortunately much of the "information" they are relying on is flawed or outright false.

Excellent point. An example of how dopey/innumerate much of the population is.

For instance, if 94% of the population is vaccinated and the number of hospitalizations of vaccinated and unvaccinated are equal (I'd like to see proof of that assertion), then the unvaccinated are (94/6) = 15.7 times more likely to be hospitalized than the vaccinated.

Seemingly anyone with a high school education should be able to perform such calculations. But I suppose watching Fox News or Youtube is more appealing to morons than algebra or independent thought.  :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 11:40:47 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 19, 2022, 11:33:07 AM
My condolences for your loss.

Thank you, much appreciated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 19, 2022, 11:42:39 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 11:07:38 AM
Hear, hear!

My retired nurse friend who lives in northern Michigan continues to send me Jimmy Dore videos that extol the dangers of vaccines, and other videos purporting to reveal "interesting" facts such as that the vaccinated outnumber the unvaccinated among hospitalized cases in Australia - I'm not sure this is true, but if the vaccination rate is as high as has been quoted (94.2%) then there would be nothing surprising about it since beyond a certain point, the sheer size of the vaccinated population is going to outweigh the greater vulnerability of being immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., if the vaccination rate were 100%, then 100% of hospitalizations would be of vaccinated people).

Many people who refuse vaccination believe they are making an informed choice... but unfortunately much of the "information" they are relying on is flawed or outright false.

Ah yes, that thing about the hospitalisation rates is an absolutely classic case of drawing the wrong conclusion because people don't understand the maths.

It's a mistake that happens so often in the media on so many things, though. You get a statistic about a population without any information about whether it's over or under what you'd expect. Being told that 16% of tennis players are left handed is meaningless unless you know whether the number of left handed people generally is under or over 16%. And if vaccinated people are 75% of admissions but 94.2% of the population (and yes we get told high figures), then the vaccine is keeping people out of hospital.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on February 19, 2022, 01:20:24 PM
I'm reminded of this:

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.LX-MaTediCX4KMM6OGwMkQHaCR?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 03:05:39 PM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.

Very sorry for your loss... and I hope you recover quickly from whatever has you ailing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 03:21:24 PM
Quote from: T. D. on February 19, 2022, 11:36:36 AM
Excellent point. An example of how dopey/innumerate much of the population is.

For instance, if 94% of the population is vaccinated and the number of hospitalizations of vaccinated and unvaccinated are equal (I'd like to see proof of that assertion), then the unvaccinated are (94/6) = 15.7 times more likely to be hospitalized than the vaccinated.

Seemingly anyone with a high school education should be able to perform such calculations. But I suppose watching Fox News or Youtube is more appealing to morons than algebra or independent thought.  :P

Yes, there are many people who fit that description, but I would not have expected this person to be in that camp. This is a woman who, in her mid-50s, went back to school, finished college with honors, and took up nursing. She had MANY courses in STEM fields as well as mathematics. The best guess I can make is that it was all abstract to her... perhaps she can do the maths but does not apply that skill to real world problems and data. Politically, she is not of the Fox News persuasion - but she has a strong Bernie Sanders-like anti-corporate streak, and it is her distrust of Pfizer and other Big Pharma companies that makes her vulnerable to vaccine misinformation.

And she is not wrong that there is a Long Covid-like syndrome that afflicts some people after vaccination (comedian Jimmy Dore is apparently one person suffering from this), but the online communities of people looking for answers for their symptoms are rife with stories about dismissive physicians and conspiracy theories about coverups of adverse reactions in the Pfizer trials that might even contain a kernel of truth - I have not researched this deeply enough to say with confidence that they do not. Once again though, innumeracy (or a refusal to think of risk in terms of probabilities) rears its ugly head: because even if there are thousands of such people in the world, the denominator is hundreds of millions of people (perhaps it is now in the billions?) in all who have been vaccinated. That means that the relative risk of being harmed by the vaccine vs. being left debilitated by the virus is still a matter of two or more orders of magnitude.

Source: a recent article in AAAS Science Magazine that's freely available:

https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-cases-coronavirus-vaccines-may-cause-long-covid-symptoms (https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-cases-coronavirus-vaccines-may-cause-long-covid-symptoms)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 19, 2022, 04:35:10 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 18, 2022, 04:20:21 PM


And it's BECAUSE of people like that that mandates even exist. ........ if people are stupid enough to not make use of them, all I want is for those people to stay the hell away from me. But in a city where over 98% of people over the age of 12 are vaccinated, it's a non-issue.

This is where I respectfully disagree. Last week I saw a media photo of the outside of a bottle shop in Western Australia where the newspaper proudly proclaimed that the unvaccinated were now allowed to enter to purchase alcohol if they wanted. The immediate thought that came to mind was that this had very little to do with public safety and instead, the vengeful WA govt had been "punishing" the unvaxxed for being disobedient enough to not follow their wishes. Why single out liquor stores? Is there a link between drinking and an anti vax attitude?

I don't give a damn if someone who is unvaccinated is standing next to me. Firstly, I wouldn't know if they were jabbed or not (and neither would any of you) and asking them if they are is an invasion of their privacy, along with other things. (Of course, the govt could mandate that all unvaxxed people must wear a pass on a lanyard around their neck so we could identify them and steer clear of them).

Second, and most important, being triple vaxxed I'm not the one most at risk - they are (your quote seems to concur with this fact) and the statistics are there to prove it. If they choose to go down that path, I don't care. If they are lucky (and most of them will be - stats once again) the consequences will be minimal at most. The odd one or two will get really sick but hey - it's their choice!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 19, 2022, 04:46:01 PM
Quote from: T. D. on February 19, 2022, 11:36:36 AM
Excellent point. An example of how dopey/innumerate much of the population is.

For instance, if 94% of the population is vaccinated and the number of hospitalizations of vaccinated and unvaccinated are equal (I'd like to see proof of that assertion), then the unvaccinated are (94/6) = 15.7 times more likely to be hospitalized than the vaccinated.



The published statistics, which are easy to access, back up this up and while your figures are not necessarily 100% accurate, you are right in stating that it's the unvaxxed that make up the majority of hospital admissions - FOR COVID!. What is not taken into account is that people admitted to hospital here in Australia for reasons other than Covid, are lumped in with those who are if they test positive after admission. The ABS admitted this earlier this week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 19, 2022, 04:53:55 PM
Quote from: Holden on February 19, 2022, 04:35:10 PM
This is where I respectfully disagree. Last week I saw a media photo of the outside of a bottle shop in Western Australia where the newspaper proudly proclaimed that the unvaccinated were now allowed to enter to purchase alcohol if they wanted. The immediate thought that came to mind was that this had very little to do with public safety and instead, the vengeful WA govt had been "punishing" the unvaxxed for being disobedient enough to not follow their wishes. Why single out liquor stores? Is there a link between drinking and an anti vax attitude?

I don't give a damn if someone who is unvaccinated is standing next to me. Firstly, I wouldn't know if they were jabbed or not (and neither would any of you) and asking them if they are is an invasion of their privacy, along with other things. (Of course, the govt could mandate that all unvaxxed people must wear a pass on a lanyard around their neck so we could identify them and steer clear of them).

Second, and most important, being triple vaxxed I'm not the one most at risk - they are (your quote seems to concur with this fact) and the statistics are there to prove it. If they choose to go down that path, I don't care. If they are lucky (and most of them will be - stats once again) the consequences will be minimal at most. The odd one or two will get really sick but hey - it's their choice!

Bottle shops might not have been the only confined space where there was a restriction in WA. Confined space being the point.

Someone being unvaccinated does increase my risk, even if I'm vaccinated, especially with the omicron variant where the effectiveness of the vaccine is reduced for preventing infection. The data shows that an unvaccinated person who is infected will shed more virus than a vaccinated person who is infected. If they shed more virus, that increases the chance of me being infected, in spite of my vaccine.

And this is one of the things that people don't understand. For many diseases, vaccination is not simply an individual choice because few vaccines are anywhere near 100% effective. The goal is to put barriers up to the disease at a population level, make spread more difficult, reduce the R number to below 1.0 and snuff the outbreak out.

Why people don't understand it, I don't know. We don't seem very good at explaining and/or comprehending risk reduction and treat protection as a blunt yes/no question.

It's a bit like dealing with a fire by putting flame retardant on a favourite tree and then concluding that it doesn't matter whether the other trees around it are protected or not. Of course it matters. It's flame retardant, not flame extinguisher, and it's effective when you make as many trees as possible harder to burn.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 05:14:15 PM
Quote from: Holden on February 19, 2022, 04:46:01 PM
The published statistics, which are easy to access, back up this up and while your figures are not necessarily 100% accurate, you are right in stating that it's the unvaxxed that make up the majority of hospital admissions - FOR COVID!. What is not taken into account is that people admitted to hospital here in Australia for reasons other than Covid, are lumped in with those who are if they test positive after admission. The ABS admitted this earlier this week.

Actually, what I (and, I think, T.D. also) was saying is that it's possible for the vaxxed (not the unvaxxed) to make up the majority of hospital admissions and still be much less likely to require hospitalisation if they contract COVID, when the vaccinated make up the vast majority of the population as a whole.

And indeed, if this article by PolitiFact is accurate, that is precisely the situation in NSW:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/14/blog-posting/australia-vaccination-status-hospitalized-covid-19/ (https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/14/blog-posting/australia-vaccination-status-hospitalized-covid-19/)

Politifact states that (a) the figures only apply to NSW, and (b) it's true that the absolute numbers of vaccinated people in hospital for COVID surpass those of the unvaxxed, but that this fact is misleading because of the 93% vaccination rate (age 12 and up) in NSW. Given that, the unvaxxed are still overrepresented in COVID hospitalisations. And the situation is even clearer when ICU bed occupancy is considered -  the unvaxxed make up slightly over half of the people in ICU beds, testifying to the effectiveness of vaccines in keeping people from becoming really seriously ill from COVID.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2022, 07:15:31 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 19, 2022, 03:05:39 PM
Very sorry for your loss... and I hope you recover quickly from whatever has you ailing.

Thank you very much.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 20, 2022, 08:03:57 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.

My condolences and prayer for you and your family. Get well soon, Andrei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2022, 08:28:16 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on February 20, 2022, 08:03:57 AM
My condolences and prayer for you and your family. Get well soon, Andrei.

Thank you very much.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2022, 06:24:31 PM
US virus cases, hospitalizations continue steady decline
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 21, 2022, 07:46:18 PM
Quote from: Florestan on February 19, 2022, 07:44:32 AM
Since last Tuesday until today past noon I had the following symptoms: sore throat, cough, fever about 38 (subsiding with treatnent), extremely running nose, extremely watery eyes. Iow, the very classical symptoms of the very classical flu. I tested negative twice on a quick saliva test. Nevertheless, I can't rule out omicron. The only reason I did not get an official PCR test (which, if positive, would have automatically entitled me to get the Covid Pass) was that exactly on last Wednesday my father-in-law passed away and we had to organize, and attend, his funerals which took place today --- so I really could not afford a quarantine.

I have been wearing (double) masks all throughout this time frame.

Right now I am much better on all counts.
Hope you get better soon and sorry to hear about that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 21, 2022, 11:59:45 PM
This from the NYT. While it is not peer reviewed to my knowledge, it does support what's known about how the body fights infections. Let's hope they are right.

New York: As people across the world grapple with the prospect of living with the coronavirus for the foreseeable future, one question looms large: how soon before they need yet another shot?

Not for many months, and perhaps not for years, according to a flurry of new studies.

Three doses of a COVID vaccine — or even just two — are enough to protect most people from serious illness and death for a long time, the studies suggest.

"We're starting to see now diminishing returns on the number of additional doses," said John Wherry, director of the Institute for immunology at the University of Pennsylvania. Although people who are over 65 or at high risk of illness may benefit from a fourth vaccine dose, it may be unnecessary for most people, he added.

American federal health officials including Dr Anthony Fauci, the Biden administration's top COVID adviser, have also said that they are unlikely to recommend a fourth dose before the northern autumn.

The Omicron variant can dodge antibodies — immune molecules that prevent the virus from infecting cells — produced after two doses of a COVID vaccine. But a third shot of the mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech or by Moderna prompts the body to make a much wider variety of antibodies, which would be difficult for any variant of the virus to evade, according to the most recent study.

The diverse repertoire of antibodies produced should be able to protect people from new variants, even those that differ significantly from the original version of the virus, the study suggests.

"If people are exposed to another variant like Omicron, they now got some extra ammunition to fight it," said Dr Julie McElrath, an infectious disease physician and immunologist at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre in Seattle.

What's more, other parts of the immune system can remember and destroy the virus over many months if not years, according to at least four studies published in top-tier journals over the past month.

Specialised immune cells called T-cells produced after immunisation by four brands of COVID vaccine — Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax — are about 80 per cent as powerful against Omicron as other variants, the research found. Given how different Omicron's mutations are from previous variants, it is very likely that T cells would mount a similarly robust attack on any future variant as well, researchers said.

This matches what scientists have found for the SARS coronavirus, which killed nearly 800 people in a 2003 epidemic in Asia. In people exposed to that virus, T cells have lasted more than 17 years. Evidence so far indicates that the immune cells for the new coronavirus — sometimes called memory cells — may also decline very slowly, experts said.

"Memory responses can last for ages," said Wendy Burgers, an immunologist at the University of Cape Town who led one of the studies, published in the journal Nature. "Potentially, the T-cell response is extremely long-lived."

Throughout the pandemic, a disproportionate amount of research attention has gone to antibodies, the body's first line of defence against a virus. That is partly because these molecules are relatively easy to study. They can be measured from a drop of blood.


Few labs have the wherewithal to study these cells, and their findings lag weeks behind those on antibodies. Perhaps as a result, scientists have frequently overlooked the importance of other parts of the immune system, experts said.

"Most people don't even know what they are — a lot of doctors and scientists are not completely clear what a T cell is," said Dr Dan Barouch, a virus expert at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre in Boston who led one of the T-cell studies.

"Fundamentally, I would argue that T cells are probably more important than what many people have given them credit for," Barouch said.

Antibodies spike after every shot of vaccine — or after each exposure to the virus — and inevitably decline within a few weeks to months.

Waning antibody levels after two vaccine doses prompted American officials to recommend boosters for everyone older than 12. The extra shots fortified antibody levels and helped to contain Omicron's spread, but they too appear to lose some of their ability to prevent infections within four months, according to recent data from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

Antibodies recognise two or three key parts of the spike protein, a protrusion on the outside of the coronavirus that allows it to latch on to human cells. But T-cells detect many more parts of the spike, and so are less likely to fail when the virus gains mutations in some of them.

Vaccines also encode a memory of the virus in B cells, which can churn out fresh batches of antibodies within four or five days after a new exposure to the virus.

This dual punch of T and B cells help explain why many people who received two or even three doses of vaccine could still be infected with the Omicron variant, but only a small percentage became seriously ill.

"You will see a decrease of the antibody levels over time, but if memory B cells are still there, and memory T cells are still there, they can kick back into action relatively quickly," said Alessandro Sette, an immunologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology who led a new study of T cells published in Cell.

Memory B cells become increasingly sophisticated over time, and they learn to recognise a diverse set of viral genetic sequences. The longer they have to practice, the broader the range of virus variants they can thwart.

Researchers showed last year that the elite school inside of lymph nodes where the B cells train, called the germinal centre, remains active for at least 15 weeks after the second dose of a COVID vaccine. In an updated study published in the journal Nature, the same team showed that six months after vaccination, memory B cells continue to mature, and the antibodies they produce keep gaining the ability to recognise new variants.

"Those antibodies at six months are better binders and more potent neutralizers than the ones that are produced one month after immunisation," said Ali Ellebedy, an immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis who led the study.

In the newest study, another team showed that a third shot creates an even richer pool of B cells than the second shot did, and the antibodies they produce recognise a broader range of variants. In laboratory experiments, these antibodies were able to fend off the beta, Delta and Omicron variants. In fact, more than half of the antibodies seen one month after a third dose were able to neutralise Omicron, even though the vaccine was not designed for that variant, the study found.

"If you've had a third dose, you're going to have a rapid response that's going to have quite a bit of specificity for Omicron, which explains why people that have had a third dose do so much better," said Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University who led the study.

Memory cells produced after infection with the coronavirus, rather than by the vaccines, seem less potent against the Omicron variant, according to a study published last month in Nature Medicine. Immunity generated by infection "varies quite a lot, while the vaccine response is much more consistently good," said Marcus Buggert, an immunologist at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden who led the study.

Still, the recent studies suggest that in most people, the immunity gained from infection or vaccination will hold up for a long while. Even if mutations in new variants change some of the viral regions that T cells recognise, there would still be enough others to maintain a reasonably strong immune response, experts said.

One big unknown is how slowly the T cells may decline, and whether two doses of vaccine can create a long-lasting response, or if instead people would need three — as some experts have suggested — to cement immune memory.

"That's a question that we don't know the answer to yet," Burgers said. "Those are the kind of studies that we're going to need to do."

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 22, 2022, 02:38:26 AM
Quote from: greg on February 21, 2022, 07:46:18 PM
Hope you get better soon and sorry to hear about that.

Manyt hanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2022, 11:03:13 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 20, 2022, 07:15:31 AM
Thank you very much.
So sorry to hear of your loss Andrei.  My condolences to you, your wife, family, and relatives and friends of his.

Hope that you're starting to feel better too.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 22, 2022, 11:44:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 22, 2022, 11:03:13 AM
So sorry to hear of your loss Andrei.  My condolences to you, your wife, family, and relatives and friends of his.

Hope that you're starting to feel better too.

PD

Thank you very much, PD.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 25, 2022, 09:01:46 AM
Bill Gates: 'If every country does what Australia did,' the world could prevent the next pandemic

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/bill-gates-if-every-country-does-what-australia-did-the-world-could-prevent-the-next-pandemic/ar-AAUgGdd?ocid=winp1taskbar



Quote
For months, Bill Gates has warned of a new pandemic looming on the horizon. And according to the Microsoft co-founder, one country has already laid out a blueprint for successfully mitigating it.

"If every country does what Australia did, then you wouldn't be calling [the next outbreak] a pandemic," Gates, a health philanthropist who has dedicated billions of dollars to vaccine research, said at the annual Munich Security Conference


Is it possible to prevent the next pandemic? If every country does what Australia did, says Bill Gates
Keeping a new outbreak from becoming a pandemic would almost certainly prevent many of the global consequences caused by Covid-19. But, Gates noted, it'll likely require much stricter policies in a future outbreak's early days than how most of the world enacted against Covid.

And countries will need to maintain those policies for a sustained period of time, even potentially against public pressure.

Gates cited Australia's Covid response as the gold standard to follow. The country reopened its international borders this week for the first time since March 2020. Over the course of the pandemic, returning citizens and approved international travelers have been required to quarantine in hotels guarded by police and military members. Australia's states even periodically locked down their respective borders.

Thousands of Australians protested those lockdowns, but the measures seem to have worked: Since the beginning of the pandemic, only 20 per 100,000 Australians have died from Covid, according to a New York Times analysis of John Hopkins University data. That's a significantly lower figure than the 283 per 100,000 Americans who have died from Covid, according to the same analysis.


Anyone feel anything... a bit negative when reading this?
So if you look at the reactions, disproportionally negative. 2477 angry reactions. 653 positive.

Great example of why the MSM is hated by many. This isn't the way forward.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 25, 2022, 09:33:52 AM
Quote from: greg on February 25, 2022, 09:01:46 AM
Great example of why the MSM is hated by many. This isn't the way forward.

If you hate the MSM for reporting that Celebrity N. has an opinion (setting aside the q. of the validity of said opinion) you may be a logic-challenged snowflake.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 12:52:21 PM
Quote from: greg on February 25, 2022, 09:01:46 AM
Bill Gates: 'If every country does what Australia did,' the world could prevent the next pandemic

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/bill-gates-if-every-country-does-what-australia-did-the-world-could-prevent-the-next-pandemic/ar-AAUgGdd?ocid=winp1taskbar




Anyone feel anything... a bit negative when reading this?
So if you look at the reactions, disproportionally negative. 2477 angry reactions. 653 positive.

Great example of why the MSM is hated by many. This isn't the way forward.

Oh dear, someone reported an opinion that other people didn't like and that leads you to comment on the mainstream media.

Half the fucking problem is that people have been taught by their social media bubbles that they should only hear things they LIKE. Your response to a report you don't LIKE is that it shouldn't have been reported. No discussion of whether it's true or not. No observation about how Australian death rates were massively lower than American ones. Just a declaration it's not the way forward.

Someone made you feel negative. Oh poor you.

How pathetic.

We also don't die from guns all the time here, and have a health system that generally works pretty well, but for some reason there's a part of American society that is completely terrified by all of these things.

Just because the MSM isn't brainwashing you doesn't mean you're not brainwashed. Just means you haven't identified the culprit.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 25, 2022, 04:25:32 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 25, 2022, 09:33:52 AM
If you hate the MSM for reporting that Celebrity N. has an opinion (setting aside the q. of the validity of said opinion) you may be a logic-challenged snowflake.
Why is Bill Gates' opinion important in the first place? Why not balance out that opinion with something else? Why not mention the negative aspects of this approach?

Big corporations giving one of the richest people in the world a voice, with no counter balance. And it so happens that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer during the pandemic. It seems almost as if they want this to happen again, it is profitable, after all, if you're rich. And who cares what the people say.

That really doesn't strike you negatively, at all?




Quote from: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 12:52:21 PM
Oh dear, someone reported an opinion that other people didn't like and that leads you to comment on the mainstream media.

Half the fucking problem is that people have been taught by their social media bubbles that they should only hear things they LIKE. Your response to a report you don't LIKE is that it shouldn't have been reported. No discussion of whether it's true or not. No observation about how Australian death rates were massively lower than American ones. Just a declaration it's not the way forward.

Someone made you feel negative. Oh poor you.

How pathetic.

We also don't die from guns all the time here, and have a health system that generally works pretty well, but for some reason there's a part of American society that is completely terrified by all of these things.

Just because the MSM isn't brainwashing you doesn't mean you're not brainwashed. Just means you haven't identified the culprit.
I don't know why my comment gives others an excuse to be personally mocked.
See the above comment. Remember, they know what's best for us, your opinion doesn't matter.
Also don't know why you would bring up health care and guns when I never mentioned them.
And brainwashing? I think you are thinking of Poju, I can't think of a time I used that word, but I remember that he has.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 04:32:39 PM
Greg, you frequently try to present yourself as a neutral undecided person looking for balance.

This is a false narrative.

An article reporting on Bill Gates is not required to go find someone who disagrees with Bill Gates. There will be OTHER articles with other views.

As to why Bill Gates' opinion might be of interest: you wouldn't have to ask that question if you had the slightest awareness of what the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has done about world health over the last couple of decades.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 25, 2022, 04:41:55 PM
Quotereturning citizens and approved international travelers have been required to quarantine in hotels guarded by police and military members. Australia's states even periodically locked down their respective borders.

Inaccurate - apart from the odd exception, the guarding (strange word) was done by private security

QuoteSince the beginning of the pandemic, only 20 per 100,000 Australians have died FROM Covid,

Wrong word. It should have read WITH Covid. A huge difference and the Australian Bureau of Statistics admitted last week that any one who died/was hospitalised who tested positive for Covid was classed as having died/was hospitalised because of the virus. A couple of weeks ago I went to a wake. The deceased had developed a very serious infection necessitating the amputation of both legs at the knees. This was not enough and the infection killed him. While in palliative care he tested positive (and asymptomatic) for Covid. His son was horrified to see the cause of death listed as Covid19.

Next Friday, the QLD government will remove virtually all Covid19 restrictions in the state including the mandatory wearing of masks - airports and public transport excepted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 05:02:38 PM
Holden, you do realise that if any Covid deaths were misclassified, that just means our results were even BETTER?

In other words it would make our numbers even more impressive. You're saying "no, not only 20, it was even less".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 25, 2022, 05:07:24 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 04:32:39 PM
An article reporting on Bill Gates is not required to go find someone who disagrees with Bill Gates. There will be OTHER articles with other views.
From CNBC, anything very different than that recently? Where the tone is similarly neutral about reporting a completely different vision/perspective about things?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 05:20:49 PM
I don't watch CNBC. Nor is it my job to monitor your confirmation bias whereby I suspect opinions you don't disagree with won't get your attention anyway.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on February 26, 2022, 12:51:12 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 25, 2022, 05:02:38 PM
Holden, you do realise that if any Covid deaths were misclassified, that just means our results were even BETTER?

In other words it would make our numbers even more impressive. You're saying "no, not only 20, it was even less".

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying and implicit in this is that the virus has never been anywhere as severe as our media and our govt's have made out. Why this approach has been taken should be looked at in the future.

People's way of life, their financial security, their ability to make informed decisions, to feed their families has definitely been impacted. I live on the Gold Coast which is heavily reliant on the hospitality industry and I know many people involved. Right from the start, the political aspect, as opposed to the people aspect, deeply concerned me. Both McGowan and Palaszczuk shamelessly used the pandemic to get themselves re-elected with little concern about their constituents. Palaszczuk effectively trashed Qld's tourism industry in the process.

In a couple of years time it might eventuate that we look back at our initial handling of the 'pandemic' and wonder how we got it so badly wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 26, 2022, 01:17:50 PM
Quote from: Holden on February 26, 2022, 12:51:12 AM
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying and implicit in this is that the virus has never been anywhere as severe as our media and our govt's have made out.

The severity of the virus is based on deaths worldwide, not deaths in Australia.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: arpeggio on February 28, 2022, 08:45:18 PM
My brother is an antiques gun dealer.

When he was younger, he was very liberal.  As a result of attending all of these gun shows and interacting with other gun dealers, who are very conservative, he has become very conservative himself.

Even though my sister-in-law is also conservative she is also a nurse and has taken the coronavirus seriously.  My ninety-eight year old mother lives with them and she made sure all of them have been vaccinated and had their boosters.

Although my sister-in-law tries to make sure by brother is careful, when out of her control he has been very reckless.

As a result, he got infected and infected my sister-in-law and my mother.  She told me that the vaccinations probably save my mother's life and she is furious at my brother.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 03, 2022, 05:22:37 AM
It was bound to happen sooner or later with the great corona infection pressure we have been seeing lately. Both my wife and I yesterday tested positive for corona (PCR test) although we have really taken good care to avoid it. I'm in the high-risk group, and have unfortunately probably been infected the same day I got the fourth Pfizer jab. I currently have moderate symptoms, but have consulted my doctor for antiviral treatment. My wife has so far very mild symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 03, 2022, 05:29:07 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 03, 2022, 05:22:37 AM
It was bound to happen sooner or later with the great corona infection pressure we have been seeing lately. Both my wife and I yesterday tested positive for corona (PCR test) although we have really taken good care to avoid it. I'm in the high-risk group, and have unfortunately probably been infected the same day I got the fourth Pfizer jab. I currently have moderate symptoms, but have consulted my doctor for antiviral treatment. My wife has so far very mild symptoms.

I'm very sorry to hear that. I hope both you and your wife recover quickly and without complications. My best wishes to you both!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 03, 2022, 05:45:18 AM
Quote from: Florestan on March 03, 2022, 05:29:07 AM
I'm very sorry to hear that. I hope both you and your wife recover quickly and without complications. My best wishes to you both!

A hearty + 1, Poul!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 03, 2022, 05:46:48 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 03, 2022, 05:22:37 AM
It was bound to happen sooner or later with the great corona infection pressure we have been seeing lately. Both my wife and I yesterday tested positive for corona (PCR test) although we have really taken good care to avoid it. I'm in the high-risk group, and have unfortunately probably been infected the same day I got the fourth Pfizer jab. I currently have moderate symptoms, but have consulted my doctor for antiviral treatment. My wife has so far very mild symptoms.

Well that's not good news and as you say it was probably inevitable that you'd catch it some time, and it's good you've got access to antivirals. Keep your pecker up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 03, 2022, 05:50:53 AM
Thanks, Andrei, Karl and Howard.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 03, 2022, 08:56:16 AM

     My first and only Covid test was negative. I'm almost disappointed since I'm maximally jabbed and would welcome being super-immune and nearly immortal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 03, 2022, 11:57:11 AM
Best wishes Poul for a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on March 03, 2022, 01:54:11 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 03, 2022, 05:22:37 AM
It was bound to happen sooner or later with the great corona infection pressure we have been seeing lately. Both my wife and I yesterday tested positive for corona (PCR test) although we have really taken good care to avoid it. I'm in the high-risk group, and have unfortunately probably been infected the same day I got the fourth Pfizer jab. I currently have moderate symptoms, but have consulted my doctor for antiviral treatment. My wife has so far very mild symptoms.

Speedy recovery to you both, Poul.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 03, 2022, 02:11:24 PM
Quote from: Papy Oli on March 03, 2022, 01:54:11 PM
Speedy recovery to you both, Poul.

... also from me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 03, 2022, 02:16:44 PM
I too wish Poul and his wife a quick and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 03, 2022, 03:43:31 PM

     Striking new evidence points to seafood market in Wuhan as pandemic origin point (https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/03/03/1083751272/striking-new-evidence-points-to-seafood-market-in-wuhan-as-pandemic-origin-point)

Over the weekend, an international team of scientists published two extensive papers online, offering the strongest evidence to date that the COVID-19 pandemic originated in animals at a market in Wuhan, China. Specifically, they conclude that the coronavirus most likely jumped from a caged wild animal into people at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, where a huge COVID-19 outbreak began in December 2019.

Scientists who weren't involved in the research papers are calling the new data "very convincing" and a "blow" to the lab-leak theory — that the virus somehow escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which does research on coronaviruses. In reaction to the papers, they say the newly published data is tipping the scales toward wildlife sold at the market.

"The studies don't exclude other hypotheses entirely," says virologist Jeremy Kamil, who's at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport and was not involved in this research. "But they absolutely are pushing it toward an animal origin."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 04, 2022, 03:29:20 AM
Thanks all of you for your kind wishes.  :)

The next five days will be critical. I shall receive the antiviral treatment on monday, unfortunately a bit later than what's optimal, but the hospitals are crowded.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on March 04, 2022, 03:48:35 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 04, 2022, 03:29:20 AM
Thanks all of you for your kind wishes.  :)

The next five days will be critical. I shall receive the antiviral treatment on monday, unfortunately a bit later than what's optimal, but the hospitals are crowded.
Get well soon, Poul!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on March 04, 2022, 04:34:36 AM
Quote from: North Star on March 04, 2022, 03:48:35 AM
Get well soon, Poul!

+1 👍
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 06, 2022, 04:02:25 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 04, 2022, 03:29:20 AM
Thanks all of you for your kind wishes.  :)

The next five days will be critical. I shall receive the antiviral treatment on monday, unfortunately a bit later than what's optimal, but the hospitals are crowded.
Good luck with that Poul.  Best wishes to you and your wife.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 06, 2022, 04:50:52 AM
Thanks North Star, André and PD. I feel a little bit better today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on March 06, 2022, 05:57:02 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 06, 2022, 04:50:52 AM
Thanks North Star, André and PD. I feel a little bit better today.

I was thinking about you this morning, hoping you were feeling well. Good luck tomorrow with the antivirals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on March 06, 2022, 06:30:08 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 03, 2022, 05:22:37 AM
It was bound to happen sooner or later with the great corona infection pressure we have been seeing lately. Both my wife and I yesterday tested positive for corona (PCR test) although we have really taken good care to avoid it. I'm in the high-risk group, and have unfortunately probably been infected the same day I got the fourth Pfizer jab. I currently have moderate symptoms, but have consulted my doctor for antiviral treatment. My wife has so far very mild symptoms.

I'm terribly sorry to hear about about this, premont. I hope for a speedy recovery for both you and your wife.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 06, 2022, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 06, 2022, 04:50:52 AM
Thanks North Star, André and PD. I feel a little bit better today.

Very good. Keep that trend!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2022, 02:25:27 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on March 06, 2022, 05:57:02 AM
I was thinking about you this morning, hoping you were feeling well. Good luck tomorrow with the antivirals.

Thanks, I feel reasonably well, considering the circumstances. The antiviral medication didn't pose problems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2022, 02:26:37 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on March 06, 2022, 06:30:08 AM
I'm terribly sorry to hear about about this, premont. I hope for a speedy recovery for both you and your wife.

Thanks for your kind words, MI.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 07, 2022, 02:29:17 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 06, 2022, 01:49:19 PM
Very good. Keep that trend!

I will do  :)

My impression is still that it is going the right way both for me and my wife.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 07, 2022, 02:33:39 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2022, 02:25:27 AM
Thanks, I feel reasonably well, considering the circumstances. The antiviral medication didn't pose problems.

Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2022, 02:29:17 AM
My impression is still that it is going the right way both for me and my wife.

Excellen news, Poul.  Wishing you both a quick and full recovery.

In other news, most restrictions in Romania will be ditched as of March 9.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 07, 2022, 03:23:01 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 06, 2022, 04:50:52 AM
Thanks North Star, André and PD. I feel a little bit better today.
Yeah! :)  Keep it up!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 07, 2022, 05:47:03 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 07, 2022, 02:29:17 AM
I will do  :)

My impression is still that it is going the right way both for me and my wife.

Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 07, 2022, 02:30:28 PM
Pre-Omicron Covid shrinks brain. Recoverable.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60591487
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 11, 2022, 06:57:31 AM
Covid deaths probably three times higher than records say (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60690251)

More than 18 million people - three times higher than official records suggest - have probably died because of Covid, say researchers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 11, 2022, 10:47:08 PM
Quote from: Que on March 11, 2022, 06:57:31 AM
Covid deaths probably three times higher than records say (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60690251)

More than 18 million people - three times higher than official records suggest - have probably died because of Covid, say researchers.

Love that word 'probably'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 11, 2022, 11:01:33 PM
Quote from: Holden on March 11, 2022, 10:47:08 PM
Love that word 'probably'.

Me too. They used the method of assessing the total amount of excess deaths, which gives you actually by far the most reliable estimate. Even though you're counting deaths that are not in each and every case scientifically proved to be caused by Covid. We always knew that the actual numbers would be much higher than the officially registered ones. Particularly in countries with less advanced health care systems. 18 million on a world population of 7.9 billion is significant but it could have been worse... The yearly growth is 83 million, so this was only a small blip in a trend that will ultimately destroy the planet...  ::)

Australia is in the top 5 of lowest fatalities BTW.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 11, 2022, 11:13:41 PM
There were estimates at the start of the pandemic that suggested reaching between 5 and 22 mio fatalities in total.

Here in DK, fatalities have gone up after the total reopening, though 30-50% are not directly related. There's been almost no debate about it. Numbers are going down now, but it still takes time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2022, 09:46:07 AM
I know we're all ready to be done with this, but:

A covid surge in Western Europe has U.S. bracing for another wave (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/16/covid-ba2-omicron-surge/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F36559b9%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992%2F5972fde29bbc0f1cdcef9ee3%2F9%2F73%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992)

By Lenny Bernstein and Joel Achenbach
Today at 9:21 a.m. EDT| Updated today at 11:46 a.m. EDT
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:03:23 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 16, 2022, 09:46:07 AM
I know we're all ready to be done with this, but:

A covid surge in Western Europe has U.S. bracing for another wave (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/16/covid-ba2-omicron-surge/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F36559b9%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992%2F5972fde29bbc0f1cdcef9ee3%2F9%2F73%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992)

By Lenny Bernstein and Joel Achenbach
Today at 9:21 a.m. EDT| Updated today at 11:46 a.m. EDT

Should Poland and Romania have asked each and every Ukrainian refugee to produce either vaccination proof or a negative PCR test in order to let them cross the border? 

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 02:09:57 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:03:23 PM
Should Poland and Romania have asked each and every Ukrainian refugee to produce either vaccination proof or a negative PCR test in order to let them cross the border?

The article makes absolutely no reference to Poland, Romania or Ukraine. Not least because none of them are in Western Europe. But there's absolutely zero mention of Ukrainian refugees being some kind of cause of the surge.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:43:28 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 02:09:57 PM
The article makes absolutely no reference to Poland, Romania or Ukraine. Not least because none of them are in Western Europe. But there's absolutely zero mention of Ukrainian refugees being some kind of cause of the surge.

I know, but let's suppose a surge comes out in Eastern Europe (which might very well do come, right?) What then?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 02:46:33 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:43:28 PM
I know, but let's suppose a surge comes out in Eastern Europe (which might very well do come, right?) What then?

Then my answer to your question is no.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:53:13 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 02:46:33 PM
Then my answer to your question is no.

Don't play Todd, it doesn't suit you!  ;D

My whole point is that humanitarian concerns trump epidemiological ones. We Romanians would have received. sheltered and fed those unfortunate people even if we had known for sure that all of them were infected with Covid. Would you Australians have done the same? Just asking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2022, 03:02:32 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:53:13 PM
Don't play Todd, it doesn't suit you!  ;D

My whole point is that humanitarian concerns trump epidemiological ones. We Romanians would have received.
I don't think there was anything in the article to suggest otherwise, Andrei!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 02:53:13 PM
Don't play Todd, it doesn't suit you!  ;D

I'm not playing Todd. You asked: "Should Poland and Romania have asked each and every Ukrainian refugee to produce either vaccination proof or a negative PCR test in order to let them cross the border?".

My answer to your thoroughly rhetorical question is no.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:09:30 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 16, 2022, 03:02:32 PM
I don't think there was anything in the article to suggest otherwise, Andrei!

It wasn't, I agree --- just please bear with me, I am under heavy stress these days and therefore I might say things which are stupider and/or more exaggerated than I usually say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:11:51 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 03:06:47 PM
I'm not playing Todd. You asked: "Should Poland and Romania have asked each and every Ukrainian refugee to produce either vaccination proof or a negative PCR test in order to let them cross the border?".

My answer to your thoroughly rhetorical question is no.

Ah, I see now and thanks for clarifying! I utterly misunderstood your post, I apologize. In my defense, see my post above --- which I quote just in case:

Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:09:30 PM
It wasn't, I agree --- just please bear with me, I am under heavy stress these days and therefore I might say things which are stupider and/or more exaggerated than I usually say.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 16, 2022, 03:24:30 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:09:30 PM
It wasn't, I agree --- just please bear with me, I am under heavy stress these days and therefore I might say things which are stupider and/or more exaggerated than I usually say.

Understood. Peace!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:28:11 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 16, 2022, 03:24:30 PM
Peace!

Always and forever!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 16, 2022, 03:42:10 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 16, 2022, 03:11:51 PM
Ah, I see now and thanks for clarifying! I utterly misunderstood your post, I apologize. In my defense, see my post above --- which I quote just in case:

I understand. To be honest your stress is kind of obvious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 17, 2022, 12:12:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 16, 2022, 09:46:07 AM
I know we're all ready to be done with this, but:

A covid surge in Western Europe has U.S. bracing for another wave (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/16/covid-ba2-omicron-surge/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F36559b9%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992%2F5972fde29bbc0f1cdcef9ee3%2F9%2F73%2F62320b1e9d2fda34e7d4e992)

By Lenny Bernstein and Joel Achenbach
Today at 9:21 a.m. EDT| Updated today at 11:46 a.m. EDT

I understand the surge is because of an even more contagious (but not more dangerous) subvariant of Omicron which is able to thrive now (most) restrictions have been lifted.

Consequences are relatively limited because of high vaccination rates.
This might be different for some areas/states in the US and other countries.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 17, 2022, 06:11:39 AM
Quote from: Que on March 17, 2022, 12:12:36 AM
I understand the surge is because of an even more contagious (but not more dangerous) subvariant of Omicron which is able to thrive now (most) restrictions have been lifted.

Consequences are relatively limited because of high vaccination rates.
This might be different for some areas/states in the US and other countries.


Yes, the vaccine-averse MAGA states will once again suffer most.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 17, 2022, 12:12:55 PM
Quote from: Que on March 17, 2022, 12:12:36 AM
I understand the surge is because of an even more contagious (but not more dangerous) subvariant of Omicron which is able to thrive now (most) restrictions have been lifted.

This is the variant omikron B.A. 2 (the original omikron was B.A. 1), which we have had in Denmark for some time now. It's more contagious than omikron B.A. 1, but there is a large amount of cross-immunity between these two variants, so you are well protected against serious disease from B.A. 2 if you already have passed an infection with B.A. 1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 17, 2022, 01:03:57 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 17, 2022, 06:11:39 AM
Yes, the vaccine-averse MAGA states will once again suffer most.

Can I rephrase this quote?

QuoteYes, the vaccine-averse MAGA states will once again suffer most.
Their decision and and if they do suffer most then they only have themselves to blame.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 18, 2022, 01:38:03 PM
You can rephrase, but this won't be the first time that I point out that vaccination works at a population level not just on individuals.

And in fact this is won't be the first time I point it out to you, Holden, personally. Whether or not the people around you are vaccinated MATTERS. And it matters when you are personally vaccinated, and it matters when you are personally unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 18, 2022, 10:27:41 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 18, 2022, 01:38:03 PM
You can rephrase, but this won't be the first time that I point out that vaccination works at a population level not just on individuals.

And in fact this is won't be the first time I point it out to you, Holden, personally. Whether or not the people around you are vaccinated MATTERS. And it matters when you are personally vaccinated, and it matters when you are personally unvaccinated.

What I'm trying to point out is that those averse to taking the vaccine, regardless of where they are in the world, and regardless of their political (geopolitcal?) views, will be the ones that will most likely suffer and there appears to be sufficient evidence for this. I'm vaxxed and boostered and am simply confounded by those who believe that not being vaxxed is the way to go for whatever reason they come up with. I'm protected from idiots like these!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 19, 2022, 12:08:41 AM
People who will suffer include those who are vulnerable due to medical conditions or who are medically unable to get vaccinated.

And the risk to such people is heightened when they are surrounded by larger pools of unvaccinated people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2022, 06:41:35 AM
Quote from: Madiel on March 19, 2022, 12:08:41 AM
People who will suffer include those who are vulnerable due to medical conditions or who are medically unable to get vaccinated.

And the risk to such people is heightened when they are surrounded by larger pools of unvaccinated people.

QFT
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 19, 2022, 05:55:11 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 19, 2022, 12:08:41 AM
People who will suffer include those who are vulnerable due to medical conditions or who are medically unable to get vaccinated.

And the risk to such people is heightened when they are surrounded by larger pools of unvaccinated people.

You are correct, but surely those who are immuno-compromised should also looking at taking some responsibility for themselves. Our mask mandates have gone here in Queensland but I still see people wearing masks in indoor public venues. Rather than think they are overreacting, I am assuming that they do have concerns because of health issues and this is their approach to protecting themselves. I also assume that they have been fully vaxxed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 19, 2022, 07:21:23 PM
I literally pointed out to you that some people cannot get vaccinated, and your response is to come back with an assumption that people are fully vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on March 19, 2022, 10:58:42 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 19, 2022, 07:21:23 PM
I literally pointed out to you that some people cannot get vaccinated, and your response is to come back with an assumption that people are fully vaccinated.
Yes, most are but not all. From the Australian Health Dept Website

QuoteThe only people who cannot ever be immunised are people who have had severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) to vaccines ingredients which is rare.

people who are significantly immunocompromised , for example people undergoing a treatment that suppresses the immune system, such as chemotherapy

In the first instance, the new Novovax vaccine is meant to take care of this for most people with allergic reactions to the vaccine. In the second instance, it's not just Covid that is an issue - any illness that compromises the immune system is an issue.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 20, 2022, 01:25:18 AM
I know it's rare. The point is, you keep treating vaccination as if it's purely a matter of personal choice, and it's not in 2 respects. First, some people cannot make that choice. But the main point is that a person's decision to take measures or NOT take measures affects those around them.

I find it kind of fascinating how you treat Covid infections as if they emerge from the aether instead of always being a process involving 2 people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: amw on March 20, 2022, 06:04:41 AM
Wearing a mask also does not provide you with protection against covid-19; it provides people around you with protection from covid-19 (if and only if you are wearing it correctly). If you are wearing a mask and others aren't, they can transmit the virus to you relatively easily, since it is an airborne virus, generally is shed through the infected person's mouth or nose, and produces aerosols that can then cling to the bodies, clothes, etc, of everyone in their vicinity and potentially enter their bodies through other orifices (eyes, ears, etc), even if those people are wearing masks. Therefore it does not make sense to say that only the immunocompromised should wear masks. It's the equivalent of saying to the president of Ukraine something like "if you don't want to be invaded by Russia, you should disarm your military"; like mask-wearing, disarmament requires multilaterality to succeed.

It's very strange that we still have to explain this to people in this level of detail, every single time, after two years.

(And while vaccination theoretically protects you more than wearing a mask does, people who haven't been vaccinated are more likely to carry a higher viral load, meaning that they are still more likely to infect even a fully vaccinated person, because they are shedding a greater amount of virus and may—although more data is needed—be more vulnerable to variants that present with significant immune escape capabilities. Same principle.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 20, 2022, 01:13:49 PM
Yes to all of that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 20, 2022, 01:50:46 PM

     Moderna is advocating another jab for adults, a second booster. They're seeking FDA authorization.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 22, 2022, 01:06:00 PM
In essence, I'd say that the big story here, is how it has not been a big story.

Omicron subvariant now accounts for over half of all COVID-19 cases in New England, CDC says

By Martin Finucane, Daigo Fujiwara and Ryan Huddle Globe Staff,Updated March 22, 2022, 2 hours ago

The Omicron subvariant BA.2, which is believed to be one of the drivers of a COVID-19 resurgence in Europe, now accounts for more than half the new cases of COVID-19 in New England, according to estimates from the CDC.

BA.2 accounted for 55.4 percent of cases in New England as of Saturday, continuing to elbow out other varieties of Omicron.

Nationally, BA.2 has grown to account for 34.9 percent of cases, up from 1 percent as recently as early February, according to the CDC estimates.

The increases come as the region - and the nation - have seen steep declines from the Omicron surge early this year to much lower cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

But is this the calm before the storm? Experts and officials are eyeing increases in cases and hospitalizations in Europe warily, wondering if what is happening in Europe could happen here.

Three factors are seen as possible contributors to the rise of COVID-19 in Europe: the more-contagious BA.2 taking over from other subvariants of the virus; the reopening of society; and people's waning immunity from vaccination or prior infection. All three ingredients are present here in the United States, experts have said.

Some are acknowledging that there will be an impact from BA.2 but saying it won't be large. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert and an adviser to President Biden is one of them. "The bottom line is we likely will see an uptick in cases, as we've seen in the European countries, particularly the U.K.," Fauci said Sunday on ABC-TV's "This Week." "Hopefully we won't see a surge. I don't think we will."

Experts say that people should prepare for BA.2′s arrival by making sure they're vaccinated and boosted.

"I still think the best thing you can probably do for yourself, if you haven't already had a booster, is you should go ahead and get one now," said Larissa Thackray, a virologist at Washington University in St. Louis.

A Massachusetts Department of Public Health spokeswoman said, "DPH reminds everyone that the best protection against COVID-19 and its variants is to get vaccinated and receive a booster when eligible. DPH also advises that people should stay isolated if they develop symptoms, arrange to get tested for COVID-19, and follow all isolation, quarantine and masking guidance as advised by DPH."

She also said residents should remember that "free treatment options are widely available to prevent severe illness and hospitalization from COVID-19, including monoclonal antibody infusions and oral therapeutics."

The treatment is available for people who are at increased risk of severe illness, test positive for COVID-19 and have symptoms, she said.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 24, 2022, 08:39:37 AM
13 mio jabs here in DK have resulted in 20 acknowledged cases of damage to health.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2022, 09:59:49 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 24, 2022, 08:39:37 AM
13 mio jabs here in DK have resulted in 20 acknowledged cases of damage to health.

Without at all minimizing empathy for those 20 souls, that looks like success overall.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on March 25, 2022, 10:06:05 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 24, 2022, 09:59:49 AM
Without at all minimizing empathy for those 20 souls, that looks like success overall.

Yes, a very small amount of problems.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 27, 2022, 02:15:31 PM
Yet anoter reason why caution has been especially prudent through the pandemic (which is in retreat, but ain't over.)

How covid brain fog may overlap with 'chemo brain' and Alzheimer's (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/27/covid-brain-fog-chemo-brain-alzheimers-disease/)

Researchers say the brain inflammation in long covid is similar to that in cancer patients
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 27, 2022, 03:43:36 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on March 27, 2022, 02:15:31 PM
Yet anoter reason why caution has been especially prudent through the pandemic (which is in retreat, but ain't over.)

How covid brain fog may overlap with 'chemo brain' and Alzheimer's (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/27/covid-brain-fog-chemo-brain-alzheimers-disease/)

Researchers say the brain inflammation in long covid is similar to that in cancer patients

I can't read the article, but the headline doesn't entirely surprise me. There are various bits of evidence that this virus can impact and damage a huge range of tissues in the body, depending on where it gets to.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 28, 2022, 04:17:14 PM
In its first COVID-19 data report since Friday, Mass. reports 2,430 confirmed cases; 3 deaths reported on Friday
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 30, 2022, 07:36:52 AM
My father, 83, will have his 4th Covid-19 vaccine next Friday.

So, the 4th shots have begun in Finland for people over 80 and those with compromised immunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 30, 2022, 02:24:41 PM
It will be similar here. The relevant Australian body has issued a recommendation of a booster as we head into winter, for people over 65 (or over 50 for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander), residents of aged care and disability care, and people with compromised immunity.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on March 31, 2022, 04:55:46 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on March 30, 2022, 07:36:52 AM
My father, 83, will have his 4th Covid-19 vaccine next Friday.

So, the 4th shots have begun in Finland for people over 80 and those with compromised immunity.

I got my fourth jab February 18th, but was infected a week later.
Got through it without lasting problems though.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 31, 2022, 08:52:44 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 31, 2022, 04:55:46 AM
I got my fourth jab February 18th, but was infected a week later.
Got through it without lasting problems though.

Very good to hear!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on March 31, 2022, 10:22:46 AM
Tomorrow nurses go on strike in Finland and my father is unsure if it will affect his 4th shot. Hopefully he is able to get it as planned.  :P

EDIT: My father got his 4th jab as planned.  $:)

Quote from: (: premont :) on March 31, 2022, 04:55:46 AM
I got my fourth jab February 18th, but was infected a week later.
Got through it without lasting problems though.

Yeah, the vacciness don't "stop" Omicron, but fortunately make it a less severe ordeal. Good to hear you made it without lasting problems.  0:)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 04, 2022, 05:48:00 PM
Number of COVID-19 patients in US hospitals reaches record low
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: TheGSMoeller on April 04, 2022, 06:23:10 PM
Muti has covid, canceled tomorrow's show in Chicago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 04, 2022, 07:26:58 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 04, 2022, 05:48:00 PM
Number of COVID-19 patients in US hospitals reaches record low

Record low? Isn't that zero patients? That's how many Covid-19 patients there must have been before this pandemic started.  :P

Anyway, it is good news if the amount of patients is dropping. Finland has had record high number of  Covid-19 patients lately, but the amount of patients in intensive care is fortunately low. The number of cases is extremely high compared to 2020 and 2021 and also the number of corona deaths is very high, because all people who die having covid-19 virus are registered as corona victims even if they died for another reason than covid. The situation is almost funny: Statistically it is worse than ever (almost as if the pandemic really started this year thanks to Omicron), but in practice people live as if the pandemic is over. Nobody worries much about Covid-19 anymore, because some people never worried and those who did worry have taken their vaccines. Instead of Covid-19, people think about Ukraine and how Finland should join NATO yesterday.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 04, 2022, 07:37:47 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 04, 2022, 07:26:58 PM
Record low? Isn't that zero patients? That's how many Covid-19 patients there must have been before this pandemic started.  :P

Good catch, Poju!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Szykneij on April 05, 2022, 01:51:48 PM
My wife and I got our second booster shots (Moderna) this afternoon. I've had the Moderna shot all four times with no bad reactions. One of my wife's jabs was a Pfizer and that one gave her some unpleasant side effects. Hopefully, we'll both sleep well tonight.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 05, 2022, 01:55:14 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on March 31, 2022, 04:55:46 AM
I got my fourth jab February 18th, but was infected a week later.
Got through it without lasting problems though.

That's good, glad to hear this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on April 06, 2022, 08:20:55 AM
Quote from: Szykneij on April 05, 2022, 01:51:48 PM
My wife and I got our second booster shots (Moderna) this afternoon. I've had the Moderna shot all four times with no bad reactions. One of my wife's jabs was a Pfizer and that one gave her some unpleasant side effects. Hopefully, we'll both sleep well tonight.

I had my second booster yesterday, as well. My first 3 shots were Pfizer, this time I had Moderna. Very similar reaction: sore arm, but nothing more. Otherwise, I feel fine. VERY different from the effect of the Shingrix vaccine, which packed quite a wallop.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 07, 2022, 11:01:50 PM
Omicron variant does cause different symptoms from Delta, study finds (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/07/omicron-variant-does-cause-different-symptoms-from-delta-study-finds)

For me personally this is rather old news, since I have experienced an Omicron infection myself three weeks ago. After the Dutch govt lifted all restrictions it was almost inevitable. Despite being fully vaccinated, an unpleasant experience and definitely not "just a flu". I'm still experiencing some lingering after effects, though progress is steady.

China is now overrun by Omicron. We should brace ourselves for the next variant in the fall. Hopefully it will be (even) weaker than Omicron, but scientists do seem cautious on that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 07, 2022, 11:37:44 PM
Quote from: Que on April 07, 2022, 11:01:50 PM

. We should brace ourselves for the next variant in the fall.

Why do you say « in the fall »?  I mean, why not in Summer?

As far as I know, no one can say how likely it is that a variant which can replace omicron will be at least as benign as omicron. But I dont follow the latest developments. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 07, 2022, 11:54:36 PM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 07, 2022, 11:37:44 PM
Why do you say « in the fall »?  I mean, why not in Summer?

Depends on whether you accept the theory that Corona is seasonal. There is some research to support it, but there is still debate amongst scientists. So yes, perhaps even sooner...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 09, 2022, 06:07:45 AM
Quote from: Que on April 07, 2022, 11:01:50 PM
Omicron variant does cause different symptoms from Delta, study finds (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/07/omicron-variant-does-cause-different-symptoms-from-delta-study-finds)

For me personally this is rather old news, since I have experienced an Omicron infection myself three weeks ago. After the Dutch govt lifted all restrictions it was almost inevitable. Despite being fully vaccinated, an unpleasant experience and definitely not "just a flu". I'm still experiencing some lingering after effects, though progress is steady.

I'm glad to hear, that you are recovering. Wish you a speedy and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2022, 06:28:29 AM
Quote from: Que on April 07, 2022, 11:01:50 PM
I have experienced an Omicron infection myself three weeks ago. After the Dutch govt lifted all restrictions it was almost inevitable. Despite being fully vaccinated, an unpleasant experience and definitely not "just a flu". I'm still experiencing some lingering after effects, though progress is steady.

I'm sorry to hear that and wish you a full and speedy recovery.

Your experience contrasts strongly with my own: I had omicron mid-February and the symptoms were exactly those of a good ol' flu: running nose, watery eyes, cough and moderate fever. All gone after 10 days or so with treatment as for just a flu.

FWIW, that was actually the second time I had Covid-19, the first time being in February 2021 when I had much milder symptoms. I am almost 50, apparently healthy and am not vaccinated at all.

I guess the adage is true, that there are no diseases, only diseased people.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 09, 2022, 07:51:05 AM
I don't even know what the hell that adage is supposed to MEAN.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2022, 07:55:06 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 09, 2022, 07:51:05 AM
I don't even know what the hell that adage is supposed to MEAN.

I might have translated it badly, sorry, English is not my native tongue. In Romanian it's very straightfoward: "nu există boli, ci bolnavi" (word for word translation "there are no diseases/illnesses, only diseased/ill people"). The idea is that one and the same disease can have different symptoms and outcomes, varying from people to people --- this is the best I can express it, hope you get it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 09, 2022, 08:13:35 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 09, 2022, 07:55:06 AM
I might have translated it badly, sorry, English is not my native tongue. In Romanian it's very straightfoward: "nu există boli, ci bolnavi" (word for word translation "there are no diseases/illnesses, only diseased/ill people"). The idea is that one and the same disease can have different symptoms and outcomes, varying from people to people --- this is the best I can express it, hope you get it.

The idea is correct, but that is a very strange and arguably incorrect way of expressing the idea.

I mean, would anyone say that there are no guns or bullets because the outcomes of being shot can vary a lot?

It's literally confusing cause and effect, and claiming that because effects vary, there are no causes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 09, 2022, 08:26:36 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 09, 2022, 08:13:35 AM
The idea is correct, but that is a very strange and arguably incorrect way of expressing the idea.

I mean, would anyone say that there are no guns or bullets because the outcomes of being shot can vary a lot?

It's literally confusing cause and effect, and claiming that because effects vary, there are no causes.

Well, never mind anymore, then. Obviously Romanian is a much more figurative language than English, because no Romanian would ever infer from "nu există boli, ci bolnavi" that literally there are no diseases.

What I wanted to say is that both Que and I had omicron-variant-Covid-19 yet we experienced it differently, quite possibly because we are different persons with different medical records.

Honestly, there's no need to furtherly pursue the matter. At least I'm not going to.


Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 13, 2022, 04:52:03 PM
So why was the Gridiron event more likely to have been a superspreader event than the State of the Union? (https://insidemedicine.bulletin.com/are-large-indoor-events-safe-it-s-impossible-to-know-making-personal-choice-a-false-one/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 16, 2022, 11:18:55 PM
So, now I have Covid (for the first time).
I had cold symptoms (sneezing/sore throat) for a few days. I twice did a LFT which were negative. However I'm also a volunteer on the government's (Office for National Statistics) survey which means that I get tested with a more robust test (throat/nostril swab + DIY blood test) every few weeks. I came home yesterday having been out for a long walk with my wife to find an email saying that my test of a few days ago was positive for Covid - so, there we are  :-X.
I'm blocked up with a sore throat but, so far, the symptoms are those of a bad cold.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on April 17, 2022, 12:09:04 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 16, 2022, 11:18:55 PM
So, now I have Covid (for the first time).
I had cold symptoms (sneezing/sore throat) for a few days. I twice did a LFT which were negative. However I'm also a volunteer on the government's (Office for National Statistics) survey which means that I get tested with a more robust test (throat/nostril swab + DIY blood test) every few weeks. I came home yesterday having been out for a long walk with my wife to find an email saying that my test of a few days ago was positive for Covid - so, there we are  :-X.
I'm blocked up with a sore throat but, so far, the symptoms are those of a bad cold.

Sorry about that, but they say everyone if going to have it sooner or later. Hang on there Jeffrey.  0:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 01:40:30 AM
Quote from: 71 dB on April 17, 2022, 12:09:04 AM
Sorry about that, but they say everyone if going to have it sooner or later. Hang on there Jeffrey.  0:)
Thank you very much  :)
Feel a bit tired and blocked up - but this is a good excuse to stay at home and listen to CDs!
I've been sneezing a lot and was interested to read that sneezing is a common symptom for those who have been fully-vaccinated and then test positive. It is a much less common symptom in the unvaccinated apparently. I was sneezing so much that it was hurting my ribs but the sneezing has largely stopped now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 17, 2022, 01:59:48 AM
That must have been a nuisance - wishing you a quick recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 02:06:14 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 16, 2022, 11:18:55 PM
So, now I have Covid (for the first time).
I had cold symptoms (sneezing/sore throat) for a few days. I twice did a LFT which were negative. However I'm also a volunteer on the government's (Office for National Statistics) survey which means that I get tested with a more robust test (throat/nostril swab + DIY blood test) every few weeks. I came home yesterday having been out for a long walk with my wife to find an email saying that my test of a few days ago was positive for Covid - so, there we are  :-X.
I'm blocked up with a sore throat but, so far, the symptoms are those of a bad cold.

I wish you a speedy and full recovery, Jeffrey. FWIW, I had Covid for the second time in mid-February and experienced exactly the same symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on April 17, 2022, 02:10:09 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 17, 2022, 01:59:48 AM
That must have been a nuisance - wishing you a quick recovery.

+1
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 02:48:39 AM
Thanks for the good wishes guys!  :)
I've missed out on the family get-together today but I did not wish to risk infecting my 92 and 88 year old in-laws, not to mention everyone else. My wife tested negative so she has gone. Therefore I have to martyr myself by staying in, communicating with my 'cat group', listening to my CDs, reading the newspaper and playing with the cat.  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 02:50:25 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 02:06:14 AM
I wish you a speedy and full recovery, Jeffrey. FWIW, I had Covid for the second time in mid-February and experienced exactly the same symptoms.
Interesting Andrei - thanks. The sneezing issue hadn't occurred to me before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 17, 2022, 02:51:39 AM
Glad to hear it's not too serious Jeffrey. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mandryka on April 17, 2022, 02:56:41 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 02:48:39 AM
Thanks for the good wishes guys!  :)
I've missed out on the family get-together today but I did not wish to risk infecting my 92 and 88 year old in-laws, not to mention everyone else. My wife tested negative so she has gone. Therefore I have to martyr myself by staying in, communicating with my 'cat group', listening to my CDs, reading the newspaper and playing with the cat.  ;D

A bottle of wine and a pile of smoked salmon sandwiches always does the trick for me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:01:00 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on April 17, 2022, 02:51:39 AM
Glad to hear it's not too serious Jeffrey. :)
Thanks Steve :-)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:02:08 AM
Quote from: Mandryka on April 17, 2022, 02:56:41 AM
A bottle of wine and a pile of smoked salmon sandwiches always does the trick for me.
That's my plan exactly! Fortunately there is a bottle of red wine at hand  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 17, 2022, 03:23:14 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 16, 2022, 11:18:55 PM
So, now I have Covid (for the first time).
I had cold symptoms (sneezing/sore throat) for a few days. I twice did a LFT which were negative. However I'm also a volunteer on the government's (Office for National Statistics) survey which means that I get tested with a more robust test (throat/nostril swab + DIY blood test) every few weeks. I came home yesterday having been out for a long walk with my wife to find an email saying that my test of a few days ago was positive for Covid - so, there we are  :-X.
I'm blocked up with a sore throat but, so far, the symptoms are those of a bad cold.

Glad it's mild. Mend instanter!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:28:31 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 17, 2022, 03:23:14 AM
Glad it's mild. Mend instanter!
Thank you Karl.
My wife tested negative this morning, so she has gone off to the big Easter family get-together today. I am struggling on stoically at home:
(//)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on April 17, 2022, 03:35:57 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:28:31 AM
Thank you Karl.
My wife tested negative this morning, so she has gone off to the big Easter family get-together today. I am struggling on stoically at home:
(//)

You can buy positive pregnancy tests to use as practical jokes. I wonder if you can buy positive Covid-19 tests to get out of family get-togethers. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on April 17, 2022, 03:47:27 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:28:31 AM
Thank you Karl.
My wife tested negative this morning, so she has gone off to the big Easter family get-together today. I am struggling on stoically at home:
(//)

Good to see 'The Times'; when I once worked at a newspaper stand in central Copenhagen, the arrival of the English Sunday newspapers was one of the highlights, since those mornings wouldn't tend to be busy, so there was a lot of available reading time ... the kiosk was in the small tower with the clock (very old photo); nowadays it's a cafe. The buildings are like nowadays.

EDIT: Google street view should also work (didn't want to break any copyright issues):
https://www.google.com/maps/@55.6779011,12.5729841,3a,75y,295.34h,102.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stJrSJcPY5PGpGGBuKnuRlA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:50:27 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on April 17, 2022, 03:35:57 AM
You can buy positive pregnancy tests to use as practical jokes. I wonder if you can buy positive Covid-19 tests to get out of family get-togethers. :)
An excellent point! Not only have I avoided the family get together (although my in-laws are very sweet and always kind to me) but I hope to avoid the school 'Pre-Term Staff Inset day' on Tuesday as I should be self-isolating. This afternoon I guess that I'll have to martyr myself (as a Chelsea supporter) by watching the FA Cup Semi-Final on TV (uninterrupted and without being given domestic chores  ;D)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:51:41 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on April 17, 2022, 03:47:27 AM
Good to see 'The Times'; when I once worked at a newspaper stand in central Copenhagen, the arrival of the English Sunday newspapers was one of the highlights, since those mornings wouldn't tend to be busy, so there was a lot of available reading time ... the kiosk was in the small tower with the clock (very old photo); nowadays it's a cafe. The buildings are like nowadays.
How interesting! I love the old photo as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 03:54:16 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 02:50:25 AM
Interesting Andrei - thanks. The sneezing issue hadn't occurred to me before.

For me it was not so much the sneezing that was annoying as the extremely watery eyes. Never had them to such a degree before.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 03:57:07 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:51:41 AM
I love the old photo as well.

+ 1.

And I'm glad to hear that the buildings are exactly the same today.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:00:09 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 03:54:16 AM
For me it was not so much the sneezing that was annoying as the extremely watery eyes. Never had them to such a degree before.
Interesting. I get watery eyes from Hay Fever but, on this occasion, the sneezing was the dominant symptom at first. I thought that I might crack a rib if it went on!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on April 17, 2022, 04:00:43 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 16, 2022, 11:18:55 PM
So, now I have Covid (for the first time).
I had cold symptoms (sneezing/sore throat) for a few days. I twice did a LFT which were negative. However I'm also a volunteer on the government's (Office for National Statistics) survey which means that I get tested with a more robust test (throat/nostril swab + DIY blood test) every few weeks. I came home yesterday having been out for a long walk with my wife to find an email saying that my test of a few days ago was positive for Covid - so, there we are  :-X.
I'm blocked up with a sore throat but, so far, the symptoms are those of a bad cold.

Best wishes, Jeffrey. I hope that it stays mild and goes away soon [but not too soon that you have time for some more wine, eh I meant catching up on your listening  ;D]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:35:50 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:00:09 AM
Interesting. I get watery eyes from Hay Fever but, on this occasion, the sneezing was the dominant symptom at first. I thought that I might crack a rib if it went on!

You must have been sneezing several times in a row, I reckon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:38:55 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 17, 2022, 04:00:43 AM
Best wishes, Jeffrey. I hope that it stays mild and goes away soon [but not too soon that you have time for some more wine, eh I meant catching up on your listening  ;D]

Well said, Fergus.  :)

Quote from: Charles BaudelaireIf wine disappeared from human production, I believe there would be, in the health and intellect of the planet, a void, a deficiency far more terrible than all the excesses and deviations for which wine is made responsible.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:40:56 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 17, 2022, 04:00:43 AM
Best wishes, Jeffrey. I hope that it stays mild and goes away soon [but not too soon that you have time for some more wine, eh I meant catching up on your listening  ;D]
Very many thanks Fergus. So far so good, although I'm hoping to 'milk it' in order to obtain the maximum amount of sympathy. The wine and listening are going well together!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:44:08 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:35:50 AM
You must have been sneezing several times in a row, I reckon.
Oh yes Andrei, that is right. I'm used to sneezing a lot from Hay-Fever which I've had since I was a tincy boy but this was something quite different. I'm relieved that it has subsided.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:47:36 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:44:08 AM
Oh yes Andrei, that is right. I'm used to sneezing a lot from Hay-Fever which I've had since I was a tincy boy but this was something quite different. I'm relieved that it has subsided.

I'm glad your predicament it's over., Jeffrey. I never sneezed more than three times in a row and it's a rare occurence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on April 17, 2022, 04:55:25 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:38:55 AM
Well said, Fergus.  :)

QuoteIf wine disappeared from human production, I believe there would be, in the health and intellect of the planet, a void, a deficiency far more terrible than all the excesses and deviations for which wine is made responsible.


Andrei, that quote may well become my new signature  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 17, 2022, 04:59:40 AM
Quote from: aligreto on April 17, 2022, 04:55:25 AM
Andrei, that quote may well become my new signature  ;D

Go for it, Fergus!  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on April 17, 2022, 11:40:21 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 04:40:56 AM
Very many thanks Fergus. So far so good, although I'm hoping to 'milk it' in order to obtain the maximum amount of sympathy. The wine and listening are going well together!

You have my full sympathy, Jeffrey. Now, does your cup runneth over ?  :D

Get well soon and keep us posted !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 02:12:33 AM
Quote from: André on April 17, 2022, 11:40:21 AM
You have my full sympathy, Jeffrey. Now, does your cup runneth over ?  :D

Get well soon and keep us posted !
Thanks André  :)
Feeling better today but still testing positive on the Lateral Flow Test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on April 18, 2022, 02:59:28 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 02:12:33 AM
Thanks André  :)
Feeling better today but still testing positive on the Lateral Flow Test.

Advice here is to stop testing once an infection has been established. Since it tests the presence of antibodies,  you can keep testing positive for weeks to come - even when you are not sick or contagious anymore.

I wish you  a speedy recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: LKB on April 18, 2022, 06:09:52 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 03:28:31 AM
Thank you Karl.
My wife tested negative this morning, so she has gone off to the big Easter family get-together today. I am struggling on stoically at home:
(//)

Your cat drinks wine? That's damned impressive...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 18, 2022, 07:54:27 AM
Quote from: LKB on April 18, 2022, 06:09:52 AM
Your cat drinks wine? That's damned impressive...

Testimony to the cat's trainer, indeed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 08:28:17 AM
Quote from: Que on April 18, 2022, 02:59:28 AM
Advice here is to stop testing once an infection has been established. Since it tests the presence of antibodies,  you can keep testing positive for weeks to come - even when you are not sick or contagious anymore.

I wish you  a speedy recovery!
Thank you for the advice Que. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 08:29:48 AM
Quote from: LKB on April 18, 2022, 06:09:52 AM
Your cat drinks wine? That's damned impressive...
Actually his favourite dish is porridge (I can't leave my bowl unattended for a moment - otherwise I find a furry head in it.  ???)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 08:30:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 18, 2022, 07:54:27 AM
Testimony to the cat's trainer, indeed!
Well, I managed to, inadvertently I point out, get my daughter drunk as a toddler (a long story).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 19, 2022, 07:07:21 AM
Thanks again for all the kind good wishes.
I'm pleased to say that I tested negative this morning and if it's the same situation tomorrow I can emerge from isolation. I just received a call from my local doctor's surgery to see how I am. That was an unexpected surprise. They told me to 'take it easy'.
:)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: LKB on April 19, 2022, 11:48:23 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 18, 2022, 08:30:53 AM
Well, I managed to, inadvertently I point out, get my daughter drunk as a toddler (a long story).

Well, that's hopefully a story she doesn't/ won't remember.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on April 19, 2022, 11:53:15 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 19, 2022, 07:07:21 AM
I'm pleased to say that I tested negative this morning and if it's the same situation tomorrow I can emerge from isolation.

Sounds good, shame you missed all the Bank Holiday crowds and traffic jams. ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2022, 01:27:26 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 01:40:30 AM
Thank you very much  :)
Feel a bit tired and blocked up - but this is a good excuse to stay at home and listen to CDs!
I've been sneezing a lot and was interested to read that sneezing is a common symptom for those who have been fully-vaccinated and then test positive. It is a much less common symptom in the unvaccinated apparently. I was sneezing so much that it was hurting my ribs but the sneezing has largely stopped now.
So sorry to hear that you have Covid but am glad that it hasn't been worse!  All the best wishes to you.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2022, 01:29:03 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 17, 2022, 02:48:39 AM
Thanks for the good wishes guys!  :)
I've missed out on the family get-together today but I did not wish to risk infecting my 92 and 88 year old in-laws, not to mention everyone else. My wife tested negative so she has gone. Therefore I have to martyr myself by staying in, communicating with my 'cat group', listening to my CDs, reading the newspaper and playing with the cat.  ;D
"Cat Group"   ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 04:50:16 AM
Quote from: LKB on April 19, 2022, 11:48:23 AM
Well, that's hopefully a story she doesn't/ won't remember.  :D
Oh, she definitely remembers it. The occasion is infamous in the family. I was watching an important football (soccer) match on TV. My wife was out so I was looking forward to some high-quality, uninterrupted viewing. My toddler daughter was with me. I poured myself a glass of beer (maybe wine) and settled down to watch. She asked me if she could have a 'sip' of what I was drinking. I said 'just a tiny sip and no more'. I then became engrossed in the game and meanwhile she took a few more sips. When I eventually turned around she was rolling around drunk on the sofa. I told her that under no circumstances was she to tell her grandmother (my mother-in-law) about what had happened. Of course she told her immediately! Next thing I had my mother-in-law on the phone, ostensibly amused but clearly disapproving, saying 'HAHAHA - I hear that you got Eleanor drunk!'
Oh dear.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 04:55:48 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on April 19, 2022, 01:29:03 PM
"Cat Group"   ;D
That's what my wife calls it as a sign of her disapproval.
I tested negative again this morning - so back to work tomorrow.
Thanks again for all the supportive comments.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 20, 2022, 05:28:04 AM
Found out today that my brother-in-law has been ill since Friday, and now my niece has it as well. Sister and nephew... well, they're waiting...

Not an enjoyable Easter long weekend for them. But all vaccinated, adults at least have had boosters. Has still apparently been really rather lousy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 06:59:10 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 20, 2022, 05:28:04 AM
Found out today that my brother-in-law has been ill since Friday, and now my niece has it as well. Sister and nephew... well, they're waiting...

Not an enjoyable Easter long weekend for them. But all vaccinated, adults at least have had boosters. Has still apparently been really rather lousy.
Hope they recover soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2022, 07:01:29 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 20, 2022, 05:28:04 AM
Found out today that my brother-in-law has been ill since Friday, and now my niece has it as well. Sister and nephew... well, they're waiting...

Not an enjoyable Easter long weekend for them. But all vaccinated, adults at least have had boosters. Has still apparently been really rather lousy.

Hope they all mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2022, 07:25:09 AM
The unmasking of a selfish nation (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/19/opinion/unmasking-selfish-nation/)

A ruling on Monday by a "not qualified" judge appointed by an unqualified president is a bleak reminder that, for many Americans, having to wear a mask occasionally has been the worst thing about the COVID-19 pandemic.

It certainly isn't the unknown number of people who still struggle with COVID's lingering effects or the millions of children who lost parents or guardians to the virus. It's not the thought of those who left this world alone without the final comfort of a loved one's touch. It's not the grocery store employees who lost their lives because they didn't have the luxury of working safely at home.

Judging from the jubilant reactions posted on social media after airline employees announced mid-flight that passengers were no longer required to wear a mask, they weren't thinking about the more than 6.2 million people killed by COVID — nearly 990,000 in this nation alone, the highest death toll in the world.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 20, 2022, 07:25:59 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 06:59:10 AM
Hope they recover soon.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 20, 2022, 07:01:29 AM
Hope they all mend quickly!

+ 2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2022, 07:43:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 20, 2022, 07:25:09 AM
The unmasking of a selfish nation (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/19/opinion/unmasking-selfish-nation/)

A ruling on Monday by a "not qualified" judge appointed by an unqualified president is a bleak reminder that, for many Americans, having to wear a mask occasionally has been the worst thing about the COVID-19 pandemic.

It certainly isn't the unknown number of people who still struggle with COVID's lingering effects or the millions of children who lost parents or guardians to the virus. It's not the thought of those who left this world alone without the final comfort of a loved one's touch. It's not the grocery store employees who lost their lives because they didn't have the luxury of working safely at home.

Judging from the jubilant reactions posted on social media after airline employees announced mid-flight that passengers were no longer required to wear a mask, they weren't thinking about the more than 6.2 million people killed by COVID — nearly 990,000 in this nation alone, the highest death toll in the world.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on April 20, 2022, 08:03:27 AM
Jeffrey, sorry to hear you've had the virus. It sounds like things are improving, and I hope they continue to do so and that you suffer no lasting effects. Best wishes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on April 20, 2022, 08:04:19 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 20, 2022, 05:28:04 AM
Found out today that my brother-in-law has been ill since Friday, and now my niece has it as well. Sister and nephew... well, they're waiting...

Not an enjoyable Easter long weekend for them. But all vaccinated, adults at least have had boosters. Has still apparently been really rather lousy.

Very sorry to hear that, Madiel. I hope their cases remain mild and wish them a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on April 20, 2022, 08:35:20 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 20, 2022, 07:43:41 AM


Very timely article for me as well... my university president in December decided that the spring semester would be fully in person, and he's gradually been rescinding the mask mandate that required everyone to wear a mask at all times inside university buildings. First it was only outside classrooms, now it's everywhere, and of course, (almost) no one wears a mask, even in classrooms, even in crowded labs.

And now we're paying the price: one professor has a confirmed case of COVID and at least two others are self-isolating because they were exposed and are showing symptoms. Our office manager's retirement party this week was cancelled because of the suspected outbreak. And no one knows how widespread the virus is on campus because testing has been stopped completely (though I think it's still required for athletes before games).

I guess we're just a microcosm of the country... happily sauntering forth in denial, until the chickens come home to roost.  :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2022, 09:52:38 AM
Quote from: krummholz on April 20, 2022, 08:35:20 AM
Very timely article for me as well... my university president in December decided that the spring semester would be fully in person, and he's gradually been rescinding the mask mandate that required everyone to wear a mask at all times inside university buildings. First it was only outside classrooms, now it's everywhere, and of course, (almost) no one wears a mask, even in classrooms, even in crowded labs.

And now we're paying the price: one professor has a confirmed case of COVID and at least two others are self-isolating because they were exposed and are showing symptoms. Our office manager's retirement party this week was cancelled because of the suspected outbreak. And no one knows how widespread the virus is on campus because testing has been stopped completely (though I think it's still required for athletes before games).

I guess we're just a microcosm of the country... happily sauntering forth in denial, until the chickens come home to roost.  :(

Indeed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on April 20, 2022, 10:01:21 AM
Krummholz,

My school shut down for a week back in January due to an outbreak.  Admin didn't initially want to do anything about it or even acknowledge that it was happening.  But parents became more and more insistent about taking their kids out of school, and their children being able to Zoom from their rooms until they could be picked up.  Admin tried to put a stop to the latter with no effect, no teacher is going to deliberately put a student in harm's way against their will.  Eventually they had to cave and end our interim term early.

The source of the outbreak was an interim that involved day trips where the students were in a confined bus for several hours everyday.  Nearly everyone in the class got sick.  Have no idea why the teachers would think it was a good idea, nor why admin would approve it, but so it goes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 10:23:35 AM
Quote from: krummholz on April 20, 2022, 08:03:27 AM
Jeffrey, sorry to hear you've had the virus. It sounds like things are improving, and I hope they continue to do so and that you suffer no lasting effects. Best wishes.
Thank you very much indeed  :)
I'm allowed out again today as I tested negative for the second consecutive day. My wife tells me that I look better. I'm grateful for the vaccines as I could cope fine with all the sneezing (apparently a common symptom of those who are fully vaccinated and then catch Covid). I suspect that without the vaccines it would have been a lot worse.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 20, 2022, 10:44:12 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 10:23:35 AM
Thank you very much indeed  :)
I'm allowed out again today as I tested negative for the second consecutive day. My wife tells me that I look better. I'm grateful for the vaccines as I could cope fine with all the sneezing (apparently a common symptom of those who are fully vaccinated and then catch Covid). I suspect that without the vaccines it would have been a lot worse.

Glad to know you keep mending, Jeffrey!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 11:18:09 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on April 20, 2022, 10:44:12 AM
Glad to know you keep mending, Jeffrey!
Cheers Karl- much appreciated and I hope that your health continues to improve as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 20, 2022, 11:35:52 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 19, 2022, 07:07:21 AM
Thanks again for all the kind good wishes.
I'm pleased to say that I tested negative this morning and if it's the same situation tomorrow I can emerge from isolation. I just received a call from my local doctor's surgery to see how I am. That was an unexpected surprise. They told me to 'take it easy'.
:)

I don't ever get on this thread nor read it, but I'm glad you're doing much better, Jeffrey. All my best.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 11:39:58 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on April 20, 2022, 11:35:52 AM
I don't ever get on this thread nor read it, but I'm glad you're doing much better, Jeffrey. All my best.
Cheers my friend! Much appreciated - it could have been a lot worse and I'm grateful for all those vaccines and booster shots. I was rather touched when my local surgery phoned me to see how I was doing and instructed me to 'take it easy'.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on April 20, 2022, 11:55:58 AM
Quote from: vandermolen on April 20, 2022, 11:39:58 AM
Cheers my friend! Much appreciated - it could have been a lot worse and I'm grateful for all those vaccines and booster shots. I was rather touched when my local surgery phoned me to see how I was doing and instructed me to 'take it easy'.

Yes, indeed. That was quite a personable thing for them to do. It's nice to know that some people actually care about another's well-being.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 21, 2022, 03:17:52 AM
My sister has tested positive now (was negative on rapid tests, but positive on PCR).

So that's basically extending the time before the household is getting the all clear.  :-\
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on April 21, 2022, 03:18:58 AM
Quote from: Madiel on April 21, 2022, 03:17:52 AM
My sister has tested positive now (was negative on rapid tests, but positive on PCR).

So that's basically extending the time before the household is getting the all clear.  :-\

Wishing all your relatives a speedy and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 21, 2022, 03:19:52 AM
Quote from: Florestan on April 21, 2022, 03:18:58 AM
Wishing all your relatives a speedy and full recovery.

Thanks (and to others as well).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on May 02, 2022, 07:00:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.

Good luck Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on May 02, 2022, 07:02:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.
Sorry to read this. I hope the symptoms remain mild, and that you recover quickly. Take good care of yourself.

Un fuerte abrazo,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 02, 2022, 07:18:27 AM
Best wishes for a quick revovery from here. BTW, we've had two family members with exact corona symptons, including losing the sense of tasting, yet surprisingly, it was actually a special kind of flu.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 02, 2022, 07:29:33 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.

Wishing you a speedy and full recovery, Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on May 02, 2022, 08:21:17 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.

Very sorry to hear this, Karl. Hopefully it will turn out to be something else, but either way, best wishes for a speedy - and complete - recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: North Star on May 02, 2022, 09:00:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 06:22:33 AM
Well, it seems it may be my turn. I had lunch on Wednesday with a friend, who texted me on Thursday evening that he had tested positive. I continued to feel fine Thursday evening and Friday morning but Friday evening I started to feel down. I've been feverish all weekend. My doctor's office wants me to get tested, but as my left hand is still impaired I don't have the dexterity to manage a self test at home. So I'm about to go to urgent care.
Get well soon, Karl!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 02, 2022, 09:32:28 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

I hope you'll have a speedy recovery, Karl.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on May 02, 2022, 09:59:36 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

Ugh! Seems you're past the worst of it though, hope that proves true. Feel better soon!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 02, 2022, 10:33:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

It seems as if we all were meant to get the virus eventually.
Wish you a continued speedy and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on May 02, 2022, 11:05:53 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.
Good luck, get some rest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on May 02, 2022, 12:56:22 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 02, 2022, 10:33:15 AM
It seems as if we all were meant to get the virus eventually.
Wish you a continued speedy and full recovery.

That's what they were telling us from the very beginning, with a virus this infectious it is inevitable that everyone will get it. Thee we goal was to slow it down to avoid overwhelming health care providers and delay infections until after vaccination kicks in.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on May 02, 2022, 12:57:11 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

I hope your recovery will be fast and smooth.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2022, 01:25:19 PM
Warm thanks, all!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on May 02, 2022, 10:24:17 PM
Adding my wishes for a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2022, 06:48:38 AM
Quote from: Madiel on May 02, 2022, 10:24:17 PM
Adding my wishes for a speedy recovery.

Thank you!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on May 03, 2022, 10:31:04 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

Sorry to hear about this, Karl. Here's to a full recovery, my friend. All my best.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2022, 10:33:04 AM
Quote from: Mirror Image on May 03, 2022, 10:31:04 AM
Sorry to hear about this, Karl. Here's to a full recovery, my friend. All my best.

Many thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on May 03, 2022, 12:23:52 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.
Wishing you a full and speedy recovery Karl.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on May 03, 2022, 02:41:29 PM
Get well soon, Karl !
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2022, 02:43:20 PM
Thanks, gents. Mostly feeling like a damp dishrag.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on May 03, 2022, 07:05:48 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 03, 2022, 02:43:20 PM
Thanks, gents. Mostly feeling like a damp dishrag.

Sorry to hear that it's been a slog. Hopefully brighter days are coming soon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: JBS on May 03, 2022, 07:38:40 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 03, 2022, 02:43:20 PM
Thanks, gents. Mostly feeling like a damp dishrag.

May you soon feel like a dry freshly laundered towel!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 04, 2022, 05:54:32 AM
Hah! Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on May 04, 2022, 02:18:28 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 02, 2022, 09:25:34 AM
Thanks, all! It's official, I'm the proud (?) owner of the novel coronavirus. It was a rough feverish weekend, but the fever has broken, now I'm to isolate at home for five days.

Karl, I wish you a speedy recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 05, 2022, 03:21:49 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on March 11, 2022, 11:13:41 PM
There were estimates at the start of the pandemic that suggested reaching between 5 and 22 mio fatalities in total.

Here in DK, fatalities have gone up after the total reopening, though 30-50% are not directly related. There's been almost no debate about it. Numbers are going down now, but it still takes time.

An official report here in DK criticizes the health system here being too reluctant in giving the 4th shot, resulting in too many fatalities among the elderly in recent months.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 05, 2022, 08:04:33 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on May 04, 2022, 02:18:28 PM
Karl, I wish you a speedy recovery!

Thanks! Warmly appreciated!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: foxandpeng on May 05, 2022, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 03, 2022, 02:43:20 PM
Thanks, gents. Mostly feeling like a damp dishrag.

Recover quickly, sir!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 05, 2022, 09:00:19 AM
Quote from: foxandpeng on May 05, 2022, 08:11:42 AM
Recover quickly, sir!

Thanks! Feeling a shade better today: The Paxlovid seems to be doing its job!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on May 05, 2022, 09:45:12 PM
Good news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2022, 06:34:28 AM
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on May 06, 2022, 06:34:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 05, 2022, 09:00:19 AM
Thanks! Feeling a shade better today: The Paxlovid seems to be doing its job!

Beware!

Paxlovid Mouth Is Real—And Gross
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/05/pfizer-paxlovid-covid-pill-side-effects/629772/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 06, 2022, 07:11:38 AM
Thanks. My friend Peter alluded to this. Pleased to report no such experience (as yet?) Today is Day 3 of the course. The "grapefruit" mentions have me associatively recalling that my doctor bade me stop use of my statin during the Paxlovid course (since my taking the statin, I've been completely forbidden grapefruit juice, as there is an interaction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on May 07, 2022, 04:51:20 AM
Infection rates of Omicron BA4 and BA5 are picking up in the Netherlands.

Assessment on the basis of the situation in SA:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01240-x


(https://media.nature.com/lw800/magazine-assets/d41586-022-01240-x/d41586-022-01240-x_20374708.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on May 07, 2022, 07:18:00 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 05, 2022, 09:00:19 AM
Thanks! Feeling a shade better today: The Paxlovid seems to be doing its job!

Glad to hear this, Karl! Hope the upward trend continues...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 07, 2022, 09:32:48 AM
Quote from: krummholz on May 07, 2022, 07:18:00 AM
Glad to hear this, Karl! Hope the upward trend continues...

Thanks! Gradual improvement, still low-ish energy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on May 07, 2022, 09:45:15 AM
Improvement is good. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on May 11, 2022, 08:48:46 PM
North Korea has now confirmed its 'first cases' of the corona virus ...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on May 12, 2022, 02:39:47 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on May 11, 2022, 08:48:46 PM
North Korea has now confirmed its 'first cases' of the corona virus ...

Perhaps they'll wipe it out by nuking Pyongyang. >:D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 14, 2022, 07:42:35 AM
A new Omicron variant, BA.2.12.1, has taken over in Massachusetts. Here's what you need to know. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/05/13/metro/new-omicron-variant-ba2121-has-taken-over-massachusetts-heres-what-you-need-know/)

By Kay Lazar Globe Staff, Updated May 13, 2022, 8:45 a.m.

The virus that causes COVID-19 didn't change much in the early days of the pandemic. Then the number of mutations started increasing, and scientists began using an alphabet soup of letters and numbers to distinguish them.

But nothing prepared them for the dizzying array of strains that the mighty Omicron variant has been spitting out.

As one of the newest Omicron variants, BA.2.12.1, overtakes its predecessors, here's what you need to know.

First things, first. The original Omicron variant, called B.1.1.529, emerged in South Africa last year and spread quickly around the world. By late January, another Omicron subvariant, BA.1.1, already was dominant in the United States.

Fast forward to this spring. The BA.2.12.1 subvariant from the fast-moving Omicron lineage was first detected in New York in March, along with its sibling, BA.2.1. These two subvariants are estimated to spread 23 percent to 27 percent faster than their predecessor, the BA.2 variant. Consider that in early March, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that BA.2 accounted for about 26 percent of all cases in the US, and BA.2.12.1 accounted for less than 1 percent. By May 7, BA.2 had roughly doubled its prevalence, to about 56 percent of all cases — but BA.2.12.1 had exploded and now accounts for 43 percent of the country's COVID cases. (It's about 40 percent of New England cases, and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard estimates that it has taken over in Massachusetts, accounting for nearly 70 percent of cases.)

Will BA.2.12.1 elbow out its sibling for top spot?

Scientists tracking Omicron say that's already happening. Yet its extraordinary speed, fueling another rapid rise in cases, is puzzling researchers because its structure is not all that different from its predecessor's. "It's almost like having somebody who runs a 2:30 marathon changing their sneakers and all of a sudden running a two-hour marathon. It doesn't make sense," said Dr. Jacob Lemieux, an infectious disease specialist at Massachusetts General Hospital, who is also coleader of the viral variants program at the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness.

Is BA.2.12.1 better at evading immunity?

Yes, it appears it has an increased capacity to evade antibodies triggered by a previous Omicron infection and vaccination, according to recent research by Chinese scientists that has not been peer reviewed. Dr. Pedro Piedra, a professor of molecular virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, compares these virus variants to a leopard that can change its spots to help it avoid detection.

"As these viruses go through the population once, it becomes harder to reinfect the population that already has a level of protection against that variant," he said. "What we are seeing is these rapid changes that are enough for this variant to take a foothold and cause infection."

What about the level of illness from BA.2.12.1?

While this latest subvariant doesn't appear to be causing the flood of hospitalizations that the original Omicron wave did over the winter, hospitalizations are slowly rising again as cases mount in Massachusetts.

"I and many other people had expected that as treatments become more available, as vaccinations are more widespread, we would see a decoupling of the case counts and hospitalizations and we have to a large extent," Lemieux said. "However it hasn't been a complete decoupling that was hoped for. So we will have to keep a close eye on the hospitalization count."

Are there yet more Omicron variants out there?

Yes. Meet BA.4 and BA.5, the newest offshoots identified by scientists in South Africa. The two subvariants have rapidly replaced Omicron's BA.2 line, reaching more than 50 percent of sequenced cases in South Africa from the first week of April 2022 onward, a team of researchers there recently reported in a study that has not been peer reviewed. The scientists also reported "early signs" of rising hospital admissions in some of the country's provinces. They said there are signs BA.4 and BA.5 may be even more wily about evading immunity. As far as causing more severe disease, they said the jury is still out.

Are BA.4 and BA.5 in the US?

Yes. Outbreak.info, a database that tracks variants worldwide, reports that BA.4 was first detected in the US in March, and has since been pinpointed in at least 17 states, including Massachusetts. But it still accounts for less than 1 percent of the samples sequenced in the country. According to the database, BA.5 has shown up in at least 13 states, including Massachusetts, as of mid-April, but it has a tiny presence here, accounting for fewer than 1 percent of sequenced samples.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 14, 2022, 07:44:39 AM
11 of 14 Mass. counties now have high levels of COVID-19, CDC reports; indoor masking recommended
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on May 14, 2022, 01:57:39 PM
Australia is apparently top of the world at getting infected right now. How things have changed.

And over in New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern has it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on May 14, 2022, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on May 07, 2022, 09:32:48 AM
Thanks! Gradual improvement, still low-ish energy.

Gradual improvement sounds promising.  :)
Hope you continue at least in this way or still better with faster improvement!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 14, 2022, 03:54:43 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on May 14, 2022, 03:21:39 PM
Gradual improvement sounds promising.  :)
Hope you continue at least in this way or still better with faster improvement!

Warm thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on May 18, 2022, 03:03:42 PM
Clapton.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 21, 2022, 07:44:40 AM
Tracking coronavirus in animals takes on new urgency (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/05/20/tracking-coronavirus-variants-animals/)

The questions driving the researchers goes far beyond pet welfare. They're investigating whether animals infected with the coronavirus might become reservoirs for the evolution of new variants that might jump back into humans — an issue with huge implications for both human and animal health.

In year three of the pandemic, scientists have confirmed that the virus believed to have first spilled over to humans from bats or possibly pangolins has already spread to at least 20 other animal species, including big cats, ferrets, North American white-tailed deer and great apes. To date, incidents of animals infecting humans are rare. Only three species — hamsters in Hong Kong, mink in the Netherlands and, possibly, also white-tailed deer in the United States and Canada — have transmitted a mutated, albeit mostly benign, version of the virus back to humans. But those cases are spurring concern.

The search for infected animals in Texas — led by Texas A&M University in conjunction with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — is part of a scattered but growing global effort to monitor pets, livestock and wildlife for new, potentially more dangerous coronavirus variants and stop them from wreaking havoc on humans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Biffo on May 21, 2022, 08:14:04 AM
Slightly off topic - I had my third Covid jab several months ago but yesterday I had a Shingles jab. No idea why I was invited unless it is going to be the next epidemic/pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 21, 2022, 09:15:16 AM
Quote from: Biffo on May 21, 2022, 08:14:04 AM
Slightly off topic - I had my third Covid jab several months ago but yesterday I had a Shingles jab. No idea why I was invited unless it is going to be the next epidemic/pandemic.

May just have been time.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on June 09, 2022, 09:49:52 AM

     Moderna's omicron-combo booster outcompetes current booster (https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/moderna-touts-omicron-combo-booster-for-fall-shots-ahead-of-fda-talks/)

There's still much uncertainty about a fall booster campaign—including what boosters will be offered and to whom. It's also still unclear if SARS-CoV-2 will become a seasonal virus. But, given the continued waves of variants and subvariants, along with waning immunity from current vaccines and boosters, vaccine makers, regulators, and experts have broadly accepted the idea of a fall booster campaign for this year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 13, 2022, 09:40:27 AM
Omicron BA5 variant on the rise here in DK, also meaning a general rise, earlier than expected.

So far, an oncoming extra boost is only planned for those with a very reduced immune system (which wouldn't include me, since I only have relatively mild asthma).

The corona subject has been downgraded a lot in the press here however, so one has to do extra research to be better updated internationally (which I don't these days).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 13, 2022, 07:18:59 PM
Covid is making flu and other common viruses act in unfamiliar ways
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on June 14, 2022, 03:13:16 AM
Well, colds and flu are definitely back with a vengeance this year in Australia. I myself am currently sniffling and coughing away. After a couple of winters of people not mixing, all the viruses have a fresh batch of people to infect.

It's not great fun giving yourself a rapid antigen test just to check what it is that you have (negative, and my symptoms aren't that severe so at this point I'm feeling the negative test is probably correct).

But also... my feelings towards the guy who was coughing every 30 seconds at the event I went to on Saturday morning are probably more strongly negative than they would have been in previous years. If you have respiratory symptoms, stay home. You bastard. On one level I can forgive him if he's only given me a cold (and circumstances very strongly suggest that Saturday morning is when I was infected), but on another I'm pretty darn angry that he gave me anything at all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 14, 2022, 03:47:03 AM
Agree - the earlier cautiousness seems largely gone these days. For example among shop employees as well. Here, tests are also far fewer, and getting the  results of them slower too, except from home tests, that are, admittedly, cheap, but not so common.

Right now, none in ICU, however.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 14, 2022, 05:20:03 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 14, 2022, 03:47:03 AM
Agree - the earlier cautiousness seems largely gone these days. For example among shop employees as well. Here, tests are also far fewer, and getting the  results of them slower too, except from home tests, that are, admittedly, cheap, but not so common.

Right now, none in ICU, however.

That last is much to be thankful for.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 14, 2022, 05:53:45 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 14, 2022, 03:47:03 AM

Right now, none in ICU, however.

Where?

According to Statens Seruminstitut today: 9 in ICU, including 2 in respirator - the same count as yesterday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 15, 2022, 09:15:23 AM
I use the TV2 info website,
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/dagens-coronatal-overblik-over-smittede-indlagte-og-doede

but yes, my post was wrong; I meant 0 on ventilator/respirator, and not ICU (and may still have read wrong).

Today they say 3 on ventilator, apparently it was 2 yesterday. Sometimes, the numbers on that page is old info.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 15, 2022, 10:12:03 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 15, 2022, 09:15:23 AM
I use the TV2 info website,
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/dagens-coronatal-overblik-over-smittede-indlagte-og-doede

but yes, my post was wrong; I meant 0 on ventilator/respirator, and not ICU (and may still have read wrong).

Today they say 3 on ventilator, apparently it was 2 yesterday. Sometimes, the numbers on that page is old info.

This is why I use SSI's own webpage, the covid19 dashboard. The only problem with this homepage may be retarded updating but this can be seen clearly from the site. They have eg. abandoned updating in week-ends. But this may change when the third (or is it the fourth?) wave hits.

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/aa41b29149f24e20a4007a0c4e13db1d
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 15, 2022, 10:59:22 AM
Yes. The TV2 page does have some advantages too, however - including the simple, general design with a lot of easily digestable info, and the international aspects.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 15, 2022, 11:06:46 AM
To be fair I use the SSI dashboard as my primary source of information, but I also peek regularly at the TV2 page.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 15, 2022, 12:38:34 PM
Glad to see you chaps!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 16, 2022, 11:05:33 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 15, 2022, 12:38:34 PM
Glad to see you chaps!

I'm glad to see you too.

But forgive us that we use the thread to discuss local Danish problems.  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 21, 2022, 11:08:28 PM
BA5 now causing the DK government to promise a 4th vaccine boost to all above 50 years of age this Autumn, but no lock-downs in the foreseeable future. Likely a strategy to be followed by other countries.

EDIT: future DK strategy: reducing the severity of sickness via vaccines and treatment; not trying to reduce infection rates via currently available vaccines, since they aren't efficient enough for that. But reducing infection rates by other means too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on June 22, 2022, 12:55:20 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 21, 2022, 11:08:28 PM
BA5 now causing the DK government to promise a 4th vaccine boost to all above 50 years of age this Autumn, but no lock-downs in the foreseeable future. Likely a strategy to be followed by other countries.

I don't really understand this strategy, because we are going to get the next wave long before October.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 04:30:07 AM
Yes, it's being debated & some are suggesting an earlier roll out, but at least the ball has been put on the field again. Personally I'm relieved about the lowering of the age group somewhat already.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 09:52:22 AM
Paxlovid pill, likely available this autumn, showing extremely good results against corona, reducing hospitalization rate by 85% according to WHO, the press is reporting here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2022, 10:22:32 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 09:52:22 AM
Paxlovid pill, likely available this autumn, showing extremely good results against corona, reducing hospitalization rate by 85% accordong to WHO, the press is reporting here.

It certainly helped me mend in a timely fashion.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 11:08:10 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 22, 2022, 10:22:32 AM
It certainly helped me mend in a timely fashion.

That's good to hear, and I did not know it was already in circulation in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2022, 11:11:25 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 11:08:10 AM
That's good to hear, and I did not know it was already in circulation in the US.

My doctor prescribed it for me when my onset of symptoms was still quite new.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 11:15:12 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 22, 2022, 11:11:25 AM
My doctor prescribed it for me when my onset of symptoms was still quite new.

Excellent service - under the circumstances, of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2022, 11:22:23 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on June 22, 2022, 11:15:12 AM
Excellent service - under the circumstances, of course.

All in all, I am pleased with the care.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on June 22, 2022, 04:19:49 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on June 22, 2022, 11:11:25 AM
My doctor prescribed it for me when my onset of symptoms was still quite new.

Very glad to hear that it was available for you. Yes, it's been rolled out for at least a couple of months now in the U.S., but it isn't equally available everywhere. And there are serious drug interactions that mean that some people cannot take it and must rely on something else, a different antiviral, or a monoclonal antibody - of which there is only one available that is at all effective against Omicron and subvariants... as the director of our health department recently said, Paxlovid is by far the treatment of first choice if it's not contraindicated for some reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 22, 2022, 04:48:42 PM
Quote from: krummholz on June 22, 2022, 04:19:49 PM
Very glad to hear that it was available for you. Yes, it's been rolled out for at least a couple of months now in the U.S., but it isn't equally available everywhere. And there are serious drug interactions that mean that some people cannot take it and must rely on something else, a different antiviral, or a monoclonal antibody - of which there is only one available that is at all effective against Omicron and subvariants... as the director of our health department recently said, Paxlovid is by far the treatment of first choice if it's not contraindicated for some reason.

I had to discontinue my statin for a couple of weeks, while the Paxlovid was in my system.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on June 27, 2022, 02:17:11 PM
Finally got a Positive score on my Covid test after four tries!  :)

I see what I was doing wrong the whole time. I was staying home, avoiding everyone for two years. But no! Don't do that, stupid! You'll never pass the test that way!

My employer tells me to go back to work. They have a big celebration for their 100th birthday, and the office is extremely crowded, and you have to get past 50 people blocking the hallway, maskless, in order to get to your desk. I think that is most likely what helped. I get it now, you have to be around people!

Wow, I'm so dumb and reckless, people in power should definitely make decisions for me because I don't know what I'm doing. Two years of failing the test, how pathetic! Obviously I cannot figure this out on my own.


(although idk what the intention was with the mandatory vaccines for employees was that I ended up getting... I was trying to test positive, but vaccines are trying to make you test negative? Why did they try to make it harder?  ??? Oh well... they didn't really help, so doesn't really matter I guess)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 27, 2022, 04:56:43 PM
If you're healthy enough to be up and on the internet posting dull witted sarcasm while positive with covid  then the vaccine may helping far more than you seem able to see.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on June 27, 2022, 11:02:36 PM
Vaccines are not especially trying to make you test negative. The primary goal of developing a vaccine so rapidly was to keep you alive.

So far it's working.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on June 29, 2022, 01:41:50 PM
During delta times, I think that was more likely the case that it's very effective at keeping you out of the hospital.
But nowadays, not quite the same... no way to compare me specifically, exactly unless you split reality in two and fork the two scenarios of getting the vaccine vs. not getting it.
When my mom got it (few months ago, not vaccinated) it wasn't worse than mine. So at this point I'm not sure how much it's needed.
Was only healthy enough after a few days. First few days, couldn't even drive to the store to pick up food or submit the covid test.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on June 29, 2022, 02:11:54 PM
Right. So you're making witticisms about a vaccine that was developed and most likely given to you before omicron existed, on the basis that you think it wasn't needed for omicron.

No doubt you're one of these people who thinks fixing the Y2K bug was a waste of effort because everything was fine afterwards.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 29, 2022, 02:41:41 PM
Deep breaths, greg!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on June 29, 2022, 02:42:13 PM
Quote from: greg on June 29, 2022, 01:41:50 PM
no way to compare me specifically, exactly unless you split reality in two and fork the two scenarios of getting the vaccine vs. not getting it.


We already have that information in analysis of death rates in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and in much other data elsewhere:

(https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/covidDeaths_graphic_d2.png)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-compare-covid-deaths-for-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-people/

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 01, 2022, 06:10:45 PM
That's not what I'm talking about, I said me (one person) specifically. Not people in general.
It's probably just a case of the virus changing a bit after what I got was intended for, as Madiel is implying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 01, 2022, 06:26:33 PM
I'm not implying it, I'm downright saying it. It's basic common knowledge of anyone who bothers to follow the news, or frankly anyone who understands how time works.

Plus the vaccine was NEVER a guarantee that you wouldn't get infected, and was never intended to be.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on July 02, 2022, 03:58:49 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 01, 2022, 06:26:33 PM
Plus the vaccine was NEVER a guarantee that you wouldn't get infected, and was never intended to be.

Yeah, the WHO had to change the definition of "vaccine" when that became apparent. >:(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 02, 2022, 05:02:42 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on July 02, 2022, 03:58:49 AM
Yeah, the WHO had to change the definition of "vaccine" when that became apparent. >:(

Or maybe everyone had to catch up on decades of scientific reality instead of relying on a pop culture definition of vaccine that has been wrong.

Seriously. No vaccine is 100% preventative. None. The fact that you didn't notice this for any other disease doesn't mean it wasn't true.

We deal with the fact that it isn't 100% in part by the concept of herd immunity. A concept that people have been roundly misunderstanding or ignoring and refusing to take part in.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 05:20:32 AM
I got Covid a couple of weeks ago. I've never been vaccinated or boosted. My experience with it is it's much like the flu. After 3 days everything was back to normal.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 02, 2022, 05:24:03 AM
Quote from: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 05:20:32 AM
I got Covid a couple of weeks ago. I've never been vaccinated or boosted. My experience with it is it's much like the flu. After 3 days everything was back to normal.

You do understand that the flu has a chance of killing you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 05:24:59 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 02, 2022, 05:24:03 AM
You do understand that the flu has a chance of killing you?
Yeah, I do. I did get a flu shot last October. There are quite a few things that have a chance of killing me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 02, 2022, 06:03:43 AM
Quote from: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 05:24:59 AM
Yeah, I do. I did get a flu shot last October. There are quite a few things that have a chance of killing me.

So you get vaccinated against the flu, but not against a disease that you describe as being like the flu (and which was actually deadlier than the flu in its original form, though I don't know quite where the death rate is for omicron variants).

Why?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 06:10:58 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 02, 2022, 06:03:43 AM
So you get vaccinated against the flu, but not against a disease that you describe as being like the flu (and which was actually deadlier than the flu in its original form, though I don't know quite where the death rate is for omicron variants).

Why?
I was going to get it at work but just never did. I might've caught the "original form" at one time and didn't show symptoms. Who knows.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 02, 2022, 07:09:21 AM
Quote from: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 05:20:32 AM
I got Covid a couple of weeks ago. I've never been vaccinated or boosted. My experience with it is it's much like the flu. After 3 days everything was back to normal.

Very glad yours was so mild. My wife got COVID before the vaccine was available. She's suffering from Long COVID garbage.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 08:59:30 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 02, 2022, 07:09:21 AM
Very glad yours was so mild. My wife got COVID before the vaccine was available. She's suffering from Long COVID garbage.
Sorry to hear that, and I wish her a full recovery.

From March '20 until the time that I came down with Covid, I didn't have so much as the sniffles...and during that time I wore a mask at work, at the store etc. It was after I stopped wearing a mask (regulations relaxed) that I got Covid, so I wonder if masking might be more effective than we sometimes might think. Of course correlation/causation etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 02, 2022, 09:03:50 AM
Quote from: DizzyD on July 02, 2022, 08:59:30 AM
Sorry to hear that, and I wish her a full recovery.

Thanks!

QuoteFrom March '20 until the time that I came down with Covid, I didn't have so much as the sniffles...and during that time I wore a mask at work, at the store etc. It was after I stopped wearing a mask (regulations relaxed) that I got Covid, so I wonder if masking might be more effective than we sometimes might think. Of course correlation/causation etc.

I think it's fairly clear that masking has had its health benefits.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on July 02, 2022, 09:17:43 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 02, 2022, 07:09:21 AM
My wife got COVID before the vaccine was available. She's suffering from Long COVID garbage.
Sorry to learn about that. Hope she gets rid of these long-term aftermaths soon.

I tested positive yesterday morning (took the antigen test after feeling unwell on Thursday night). I'm fully vaccinated (Johnson & Johnson, plus Pfizer-BioNTech booster). No serious symptoms, just low-grade fever, general malaise and weakness. Will be staying in for the next days (fortunately, I can work from home), and hope things improve quickly.

As I always say, in my case (and I'm afraid in most) the question was "when" and not "if". I've travelled quite a bit around Europe  (on business and for leisure) over the past 12 months, and have led a more or less "normal" life. But now that there's no mask mandate in Spain (except on public transport —including planes— and hospitals), we're all inevitably more exposed. Many friends and relatives have been infected recently, but with no serious consequences.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 02, 2022, 09:27:06 AM
Thanks, Rafael! Mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 02, 2022, 09:28:22 AM
Quote from: ritter on July 02, 2022, 09:17:43 AM
Sorry to learn about that. Hope she gets rid of these long-term aftermaths soon.

+ 1.

FWIW, both I and my wife had Covid twice, the second time Omicron variant. First time no special symptoms except moderate fever and temporary loss of smell and taste (three days in my case, a week in my wife's); second time, all the symptoms of classical flu. Our 9yo son had Omicron too, no symptoms at all. None of us is vaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 02, 2022, 09:29:15 AM
Quote from: ritter on July 02, 2022, 09:17:43 AM
I tested positive yesterday morning (took the antigen test after feeling unwell on Thursday night). I'm fully vaccinated (Johnson & Johnson, plus Pfizer-BioNTech booster). No serious symptoms, just low-grade fever, general malaise and weakness. Will be staying in for the next days (fortunately, I can work from home), and hope things improve quickly.

Wishing you a quick and full recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on July 02, 2022, 03:07:06 PM
Thanks for your kind wishes, Karl and Andrei.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 02, 2022, 03:36:41 PM
Quote from: ritter on July 02, 2022, 09:17:43 AM
I tested positive yesterday morning (took the antigen test after feeling unwell on Thursday night). I'm fully vaccinated (Johnson & Johnson, plus Pfizer-BioNTech booster). No serious symptoms, just low-grade fever, general malaise and weakness. Will be staying in for the next days (fortunately, I can work from home), and hope things improve quickly.

My wishes to you for a mild course and a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on July 02, 2022, 03:38:28 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 02, 2022, 03:36:41 PM
My wishes to you for a mild course and a speedy recovery.
Many thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on July 03, 2022, 04:08:25 AM
Quote from: ritter on July 02, 2022, 09:17:43 AM

As I always say, in my case (and I'm afraid in most) the question was "when" and not "if". I've travelled quite a bit around Europe  (on business and for leisure) over the past 12 months, and have led a more or less "normal" life. But now that there's no mask mandate in Spain (except on public transport —including planes— and hospitals), we're all inevitably more exposed. Many friends and relatives have been infected recently, but with no serious consequences.

Hi Rafael,
To the bit in bold, is it only for internal flights or departing from Spain? We flew in to the Balearic Islands yesterday from the UK (5 1/2 hours late which in current travelling climate is not so bad I guess  ;D ) and regrettably no compulsory masks, only maybe 10-15 passengers wore one, and that's included my partner and I. Fingers crossed.

The sunny 30 degrees will take some adjustment but will be enjoyed !  8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on July 03, 2022, 04:14:41 AM
Hi Olivier,

I understood masks remain compulsory on all flights departing from or landing at a Spanish airport. I flew to London from Madrid on Monday and back home on Tuesday (both flights on Iberia) and all passengers were told in no uncertain terms to have the mask on before boarding and keep it on until after disembarking.

What airline did you fly?

Enjoy your stay on the Balearics! What island(s) are you visiting, iif I may ask?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Papy Oli on July 03, 2022, 04:31:26 AM
Quote from: ritter on July 03, 2022, 04:14:41 AM
Hi Olivier,

I understood masks remain compulsory on all flights departing from or landing at a Spanish airport. I flew to London from Madrid on Monday and back home on Tuesday (both flights on Iberia) and all passengers were told in no uncertain terms to have the mask on before boarding and keep it on until after disembarking.

What airline did you fly?

Enjoy your stay on the Balearics! What island(s) are you visiting p, if I may ask?

We flew in with TUI, a holiday tour operator. No mention at all. Nothing apparently different for other flights to Spain when we saw other passengers going to their gates either.

We will do! We're staying in Santa Eularia, on the quiet side of Ibiza  ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 03, 2022, 08:22:18 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 01, 2022, 06:26:33 PM
I'm not implying it, I'm downright saying it. It's basic common knowledge of anyone who bothers to follow the news, or frankly anyone who understands how time works.
The problem ultimately was the time gap between my employer requiring the vaccine and the time of return to office, that's why it was ineffective.
(Return to office = you're getting Covid if you didn't already).
A shorter time gap would have proved better odds at being a little less underwhelming or non-effective as this longer time gap.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 03, 2022, 11:09:20 PM
Quote from: greg on July 03, 2022, 08:22:18 PM
The problem ultimately was the time gap between my employer requiring the vaccine and the time of return to office, that's why it was ineffective.

And again, the claim that it was "ineffective" presupposes that the purpose of the vaccine was to stop you getting infected. The primary goal was to stop you from getting seriously ill.

Seatbelts don't prevent car crashes, either.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 04, 2022, 04:54:40 AM
Quote from: greg on July 03, 2022, 08:22:18 PM
The problem ultimately was the time gap between my employer requiring the vaccine and the time of return to office, that's why it was ineffective.
(Return to office = you're getting Covid if you didn't already).
A shorter time gap would have proved better odds at being a little less underwhelming or non-effective as this longer time gap.

The vaccines were developed for the original virus, but by the time vaccines became available, the virus had mutated into something that can better circumvent the vaccines. Luckily the vaccines still protected against serious illness almost as well. So, you took the vaccine primarily to improve your changes to stay out of hospitals (that were badly struggling with covid patients) or to stay alive by a factor of about 10-20 depending on your age and health risks.

The amount of lives saved by the vaccines in the World  is estimated to be 19.8 million (1.9 million in the US) in 2021 alone, so talking about the ineffectivity of the vaccines is wild and insanely ignorant to put it mildly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 04, 2022, 09:25:48 PM
Quote from: 71 dB on July 04, 2022, 04:54:40 AM
The amount of lives saved by the vaccines in the World  is estimated to be 19.8 million (1.9 million in the US) in 2021 alone, so talking about the ineffectivity of the vaccines is wild and insanely ignorant to put it mildly.
Yeah, because I wasn't talking about the effectiveness of the vaccine for other people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 01:50:56 AM
Quote from: greg on July 04, 2022, 09:25:48 PM
Yeah, because I wasn't talking about the effectiveness of the vaccine for other people.

With respect, what's so special about you?

You've actually acknowledged that we can't go back and conduct an experiment to find out what would have happened to you if you hadn't been vaccinated. Maybe you would have ended up in hospital. Maybe you wouldn't. It's impossible for us to be certain.

And exactly the same true is for any other individual case. As far as I know I haven't had covid (unless I've had an exceptionally mild case so that I wasn't even aware of it). I have absolutely no way of knowing whether, if I hadn't been vaccinated, I might have been knowingly infected by now. We also have absolutely no way of knowing whether you would have been infected sooner than you were if you weren't vaccinated.

This is why talking about effectiveness in the way that you're trying to is nonsensical. We can't talk about it in that way, only in population terms and in risk reduction.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 05, 2022, 07:34:41 AM
Quote from: greg on July 04, 2022, 09:25:48 PM
Yeah, because I wasn't talking about the effectiveness of the vaccine for other people.

Vaccines are not about YOU. They are about EVERYONE, and that means things are statistical. Statistically vaccines have worked well saving millions of people in the World while helping keeping healthcare services up and running by limiting hospitalizations. You are "just" part of the vaccine statistics, just like all of us are. Things could have been even less harmful, if all people had taken the pandemic as a collective rather than an individual thing. Pandemics and individualism is a very problematic combination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 05, 2022, 07:37:35 AM
If I had a 20 for every time someone has reasoned with greg, "It isn't about YOU" ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 05, 2022, 12:01:57 PM
Ok, so I'm only allowed to talk about general statistical experiences, while others can talk about their personal experiences. Got it.


edit:
Let me see if I can try to explain again, if anyone gets it this time.


The people I know, vaxxed or unvaxxed, who got Covid recently, had the illness for a few days and symptoms for a week. Same happened for me.

But I'm younger than them, and also very healthy. There should be no reason at all to have the expectation of going to hospital (maybe in earlier Covid days that would be a stronger possibility, but it's pretty weak now in comparison).

So my baseline expectation was, at worst, I would have the same result. That's why I used the word "ineffective." I expected to have lesser, or zero, symptoms, but instead got the same baseline expectation.

The conclusion was that it was mostly due to the time gap. That's fine. We can leave it at that.

There is literally no point to contend with here. I'm not commenting on overall statistics at all, or effectivity of the vaccine for the general population.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 02:12:21 PM
Quote from: greg on July 05, 2022, 12:01:57 PM
Ok, so I'm only allowed to talk about general statistical experiences, while others can talk about their personal experiences. Got it.

No, you haven't got it at all.

You didn't just talk about your personal experiences, you talked about the effectiveness of a vaccine that came across as saying that the vaccine was pointless, just because of your personal experience. You didn't just tell us you got sick, you drew conclusions from it.

It's on the same level as saying that climate change must not be happening because it snowed in your town today. The snow is personal experience, but the other part is faulty reasoning. 

I recognise that you might not have been trying to say that vaccines are generally pointless, but that's what you come across as implying precisely because effectiveness only makes sense in general, statistical terms, not in an individual case. And as I've already said you actually have no way of knowing whether your illness would have been worse if you were unvaccinated.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 05, 2022, 02:18:23 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 02:12:21 PM
I recognise that you might not have been trying to say that vaccines are generally pointless, but that's what you come across as implying precisely because effectiveness only makes sense in general, statistical terms, not in an individual case. And as I've already said you actually have no way of knowing whether your illness would have been worse if you were unvaccinated.
Okay, you get it now.

This is why it's much better having discussions with you than certain others around here.

What is a better word than effectiveness, for one person? Just replace that word with it.




Quote from: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 02:12:21 PM
And as I've already said you actually have no way of knowing whether your illness would have been worse if you were unvaccinated.
Right. I'm simply comparing to expectations. Maybe they are bad expectations, which we seem to have concluded.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 02:25:21 PM
I no longer expect not getting sick, because I live in the world's most vaccinated city and people around me are constantly getting sick.

Meanwhile I've just had a cold that took 3 weeks to clear up... LOTS of things are circulating more this winter as people interact more than they did the past 2 years.

There's been some discussion of reimposing mask requirements in Australia as case numbers soar. I doubt it will happen. You do see a fair amount of masks in certain settings. In general I carry mine but just try to keep my distance from random people.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: 71 dB on July 05, 2022, 02:42:29 PM
Quote from: greg on July 05, 2022, 02:18:23 PM
What is a better word than effectiveness, for one person? Just replace that word with it.

How the vaccine affects a certain person is unpredictable, but how the vaccine affects large populations statistically is predictable. That's why effectiveness only makes sense statistically in the case of the vaccine. We can talk about risk reduction. That incorporates the statistical nature even when talking about just one person.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 05, 2022, 04:02:26 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 05, 2022, 02:25:21 PM
Meanwhile I've just had a cold that took 3 weeks to clear up
3 weeks? Yikes.


Quote from: 71 dB on July 05, 2022, 02:42:29 PM
How the vaccine affects a certain person is unpredictable, but how the vaccine affects large populations statistically is predictable. That's why effectiveness only makes sense statistically in the case of the vaccine. We can talk about risk reduction. That incorporates the statistical nature even when talking about just one person.
Yes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 06, 2022, 03:38:19 AM
Quote from: greg on July 05, 2022, 04:02:26 PM
3 weeks? Yikes.

Well it was only about one week of full symptoms of stuffed nose and so on. But the cough refused to go away for a long time. It was extremely annoying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: André on July 06, 2022, 06:17:58 AM
Lingering cough is often a 'by-product' of a cold - a secondary condition. A few years ago I had a cold that resulted in 3 weeks of lingering cough - it then degenerated into a bronchitis. They were 3 different conditions with a single initial cause. Common cold can be serious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 12, 2022, 06:36:38 AM
Biden team warns on COVID subvariant that may evade immunity
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 12, 2022, 09:51:41 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 12, 2022, 06:36:38 AM
..... COVID subvariant that may evade immunity[/i]

Same ol' story.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 12, 2022, 10:49:23 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 12, 2022, 09:51:41 AM
Same ol' story.

Indeed!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 12, 2022, 03:45:34 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 12, 2022, 06:36:38 AM
Biden team warns on COVID subvariant that may evade immunity

Number 4 or number 5?...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 15, 2022, 08:16:53 AM
From CNN: The 'worst variant' is here (https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/13/world/coronavirus-newsletter-intl-07-13-22/index.html)

Worst variant.  BA.5.  Very scary.  If it is the worst variant, as the very measured description has it, then unfortunately hospitalizations and then deaths should/will spike rather markedly, presumably surpassing 2020 figures.  Or not.   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 19, 2022, 02:51:31 PM
Quote from: Todd on July 15, 2022, 08:16:53 AM
From CNN: The 'worst variant' is here (https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/13/world/coronavirus-newsletter-intl-07-13-22/index.html)

Worst variant.  BA.5.  Very scary.  If it is the worst variant, as the very measured description has it, then unfortunately hospitalizations and then deaths should/will spike rather markedly, presumably surpassing 2020 figures.  Or not.

Already the dominant variant in Denmark. Numbers of hospitalizations are rising but numbers of patients in ICU are decreasing, so the variant is probably not more virulent than earlier variants even if it is more contagious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 20, 2022, 02:06:42 AM
Numbers of identified cases have now been pretty stable for a month here in DK, including after the recent growth of BA5 - around 2000 - 3000 daily.

BA 2.75 now considered the latest, more contagious variant here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 20, 2022, 02:29:04 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 20, 2022, 02:06:42 AM
Numbers of identified cases have now been pretty stable for a month here in DK, including after the recent growth of BA5 - around 2000 - 3000 daily.

This depends upon where you are in the country. In my area the numbers of identified cases have been slowly rising.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 20, 2022, 08:02:59 AM
Cases are slowly rising in the US as well, with BA 4 and BA 5 dominating. Despite this there have been no warnings of increased virus activity in Vermont, and I see very few people masking up in stores. There is no longer a state-run testing program though, so our only semi-reliable indicator of virus activity is wastewater analysis. We will likely not know that a surge is happening until it is in full swing. IMO anyone who goes maskless in crowded settings here is taking unnecessary chances.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 20, 2022, 08:06:34 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 20, 2022, 08:02:59 AM
Cases are slowly rising in the US as well, with BA 4 and BA 5 dominating. Despite this there have been no warnings of increased virus activity in Vermont, and I see very few people masking up in stores. There is no longer a state-run testing program though, so our only semi-reliable indicator of virus activity is wastewater analysis. We will likely not know that a surge is happening until it is in full swing. IMO anyone who goes maskless in crowded settings here is taking unnecessary chances.

Agreed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 20, 2022, 09:34:05 AM

     Increased contagiousness and lower lethality are often linked. It was also a prediction dating to early Covid days. More lethal strains kill hosts too quickly to effectively spread. Natural selection is a thing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 20, 2022, 11:30:02 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 20, 2022, 09:34:05 AM
     Increased contagiousness and lower lethality are often linked. It was also a prediction dating to early Covid days. More lethal strains kill hosts too quickly to effectively spread. Natural selection is a thing.

In the case of SARS-CoV-2, that kind of selection pressure might not work... because the virus is highly transmissible even before symptoms appear. The experts here in the US have been saying for months that we can't expect future variants to always be less virulent than the less contagious ones they out-compete. A truly nasty strain could very well take over eventually.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 26, 2022, 01:14:54 AM
One of the best opinion pieces I've read regarding how the whole world panicked when Covid appeared. Regardless of your own views which I respect, this represents mine and while you can certainly disagree with it (and many of you will) please respect that fact that this is my view and has been since 2020

Brisbane Times

OPINION
Nothing to fear but the truth: time to question our pandemic response
Chris Uhlmann

Tell me how this ends? This question was posed in 2003 by General David Petraeus during America's invasion of Iraq, and it cut to the dead heart of that catastrophic campaign.

It's a handy mental tool for probing almost any public policy so let's apply it to the latest spike in cases of COVID-19.

As the number of COVID cases spikes, experts are calling for more government intervention.
As the number of COVID cases spikes, experts are calling for more government intervention.

Unsurprisingly, it has prompted another epidemic of "expert" demands for yet more overweening government intervention in the lives of the vast majority who have nothing to fear from this disease. And, given the mob has now worked that out, the only argument for mask mandates is to protect the hospital system.

Cast your mind back to 2020 when the first lockdowns were imposed, expressly for the purpose of preparing the hospital system for the pressure that was bound to come. Then, we were assured, intensive care capacity would be buttressed, so it could be surged to more than 7000 beds.

And yet, 18 months into the pandemic, it emerged that hospitals in states such as Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia could not cope with even routine demand. Maybe that's because the number of acute care beds in Australia has more than halved in the last 28 years.


This wave is coming slowly': Hospitals prepare for projected spike in demand
That is a reason to change negligent governments, not licence for politicians and health bureaucrats to impose restrictions on populations to mask their breathtaking decades-long incompetence.

Exactly a year ago, this column said that, soon enough, the great lie at the heart of Australia's COVID-19 elimination strategy would be revealed because "the disease can't be eliminated". It was the only rational conclusion and yet, at the time, a parade of luminaries were still clinging to the intellectual corpse of COVID-zero and those arguing against it were vilified.

In August 2021, the best minds in New Zealand's health system decided the COVID elimination strategy could be continued indefinitely and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern declared it "a careful approach that says, there won't be zero cases, but when there is one in the community, we crush it".

Pause for a moment and consider the staggering stupidity of that statement in hindsight. But the point here is, the "expert" advice was self-evidently ridiculous at the time. Just three months later, after Ardern crushed her people and not the disease in a seven-week lockdown, she accepted the bleeding obvious: that not even a plucky island nation at the end of the world could live in isolation forever.

The Chinese Communist Party has soldiered on with COVID-zero and the despotic lockdown regime it exported along with the disease. Predictably, China's economy has tanked and the misery the party has inflicted on its people is beyond measure. Perhaps the best result of that is it has prompted even the CCP cheer squad at the World Health Organisation to question its wisdom.

In May, Mike Ryan, the WHO's emergencies director, made the startling observation that the effect of a "zero COVID" policy on human rights needed to be taken into consideration alongside its economic effect.

"We need to balance the control measures against the impact on society, the impact they have on the economy, and that's not always an easy calibration," he said.

Some have argued that those considerations had to be at the heart of the response from the outset and that the cure imposed risked doing more damage than the disease. Too often the Australian solution punished the many for the few. It preferred the very old over the young, reversing the risk equation most societies wager is the best way to protect their future.

So, the answer to the Petraeus question on coronavirus is clear and has been for more than a year. This only ends with Australian governments lifting all restrictions and actually learning to live with COVID-19 as just one more risk in a dangerous world. It is a decision other nations, such as Sweden and Norway, have already taken.

This is not, as eejits would have it, "letting the virus rip". To claim that is to wilfully ignore that we have endured more than two years of their miserable prescriptions racking up a taxpayer-funded bill probably somewhere north of $500 billion to keep the economy on life support and hit a vaccination rate of more than 95 per cent, precisely to prevent the virus from ripping through the community.

So now it is past time to ask another question: Where is the royal commission into the pandemic? This was a once-in-a-century moment that left no one unaffected, so there is no argument against holding the most rigorous test of how this nation fared.

It demands a panel of the best minds we can assemble to look dispassionately at what happened, how we responded, how we succeeded and where we failed. All Australian governments should participate and offer every assistance.

They have nothing to fear but the truth
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 26, 2022, 05:27:58 AM
Well a lot of it is nonsense, and I'll tell you very quickly why. I mean, I've told you these things before and it's done precisely nothing to stop you spouting the same nonsense, but here goes anyway.

1. The proposition that you have nothing to fear if it doesn't kill you is nonsense. Long Covid is a thing. Long Covid is bad. Long Covid in some form is actually pretty common.

2. It's been shown any number of times that the economic impact of vast numbers of people being ill is worse than the economic impact of preventing people from being ill.

3. The fact that zero Covid cases is no longer achievable is not remotely a reason to stop restrictions designed to flatten the curve. And talking as if Covid zero was never achievable completely ignores the changes in the transmissibility of the virus from the time that Australia and New Zealand were doing Covid zero strategies.

4. Talking about "protecting the hospital system" as if the hospital system is a completely separate entity from the people it serves, including you and Chris Uhlmann, is just profoundly absurd. It's not just about Covid, it's about anything that could affect you. I mean, I had no idea I was going to visit the emergency ward in April until a very short time before I was there. You need a functioning hospital system with the capacity to treat you.

Arguing against health measures when Australia is currently experiencing higher rates of hospitalisation and death now than at any stage in the pandemic is an argument that you cannot be bothered any more trying to stop people dying. And the notion that everyone who doesn't end up dying will be fine is simply wrong. People are not recovering. We don't know yet but there is a real possibility that some people will live with the effects of this infection for a very long time - with all the long term damage that will do to the rest of us, whether you're smart enough to recognise that or not.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Holden on July 26, 2022, 01:12:14 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 26, 2022, 05:27:58 AM
Well a lot of it is nonsense, and I'll tell you very quickly why. I mean, I've told you these things before and it's done precisely nothing to stop you spouting the same nonsense, but here goes anyway.

1. The proposition that you have nothing to fear if it doesn't kill you is nonsense. Long Covid is a thing. Long Covid is bad. Long Covid in some form is actually pretty common.

2. It's been shown any number of times that the economic impact of vast numbers of people being ill is worse than the economic impact of preventing people from being ill.

3. The fact that zero Covid cases is no longer achievable is not remotely a reason to stop restrictions designed to flatten the curve. And talking as if Covid zero was never achievable completely ignores the changes in the transmissibility of the virus from the time that Australia and New Zealand were doing Covid zero strategies.

4. Talking about "protecting the hospital system" as if the hospital system is a completely separate entity from the people it serves, including you and Chris Uhlmann, is just profoundly absurd. It's not just about Covid, it's about anything that could affect you. I mean, I had no idea I was going to visit the emergency ward in April until a very short time before I was there. You need a functioning hospital system with the capacity to treat you.

Arguing against health measures when Australia is currently experiencing higher rates of hospitalisation and death now than at any stage in the pandemic is an argument that you cannot be bothered any more trying to stop people dying. And the notion that everyone who doesn't end up dying will be fine is simply wrong. People are not recovering. We don't know yet but there is a real possibility that some people will live with the effects of this infection for a very long time - with all the long term damage that will do to the rest of us, whether you're smart enough to recognise that or not.

Hmmmmm - some interesting personal attacks on me included in here despite the fact that I didn't write the article. But that seems to be the common response when people read things they disagree with. That's the form that proselytising takes nowadays I suppose.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 26, 2022, 01:33:27 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 26, 2022, 01:14:54 AM
please respect that fact that this is my view

No.


edit: and you know what else? You don't get to pretend you "respect" the views of others when you endorse an article attacking the "staggering stupidity" of the "eejits"...do you?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 26, 2022, 01:56:34 PM
Quote from: Holden on July 26, 2022, 01:12:14 PM
Hmmmmm - some interesting personal attacks on me included in here despite the fact that I didn't write the article. But that seems to be the common response when people read things they disagree with. That's the form that proselytising takes nowadays I suppose.

You explicitly endorsed the article as your view. Make up your mind.

And when you read things that YOU disagree with, you just freaking ignore them. Over and over all you post is variations of your selfish view about how inconvenienced you've been by lawful restrictions on your liberty.

You have no insight about what those restrictions actually achieved. You're like those people who think that the Y2K bug didn't mean much because measures against the Y2K bug worked.

Australia currently has one of the highest Covid rates in the world. We currently lack meaningful restrictions. You think is just coincidence. Or you think this doesn't matter. Vaccination has improved things, but there's basic maths involved. If death rates are cut 100-fold and infection rates are up 1000-fold, more people die. More people ARE dying. And your response is to say "why did we bother"? The whole point is that health experts are saying we need to go back to bothering.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on July 27, 2022, 09:24:06 AM
Press reports, via two large studies published in 'Science', that the major WHO research project in China has confirmed, and this to a rather definitive extent, that in Wuhan, the virus did indeed spread from the food market, in November-December 2019, not from a lab there.



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 27, 2022, 09:33:17 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 27, 2022, 09:24:06 AM
Press reports, via two large studies published in 'Science', that the major WHO research project in China has confirmed, and this to a rather definitive extent, that in Wuhan, the virus did indeed spread from the food market, in November-December 2019, not from a lab there.

I am tempted to joke, it'll kill our conspiracy-theorist GMG'ers ... only I know that conspiracy theorists are impervious to facts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 27, 2022, 10:29:01 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 27, 2022, 09:24:06 AM
Press reports, via two large studies published in 'Science', that the major WHO research project in China has confirmed, and this to a rather definitive extent, that in Wuhan, the virus did indeed spread from the food market, in November-December 2019, not from a lab there.

Okay, but then again why is it not kosher to call a disease which originated in a Chinese food market and nowhere else in the world, a Chinese disease? Heck, the Spanish flu did not originate in Spain yet a century later the term is being used without the Spanish government or the Spaniards making any fuss about it. Why then should people today be reprimanded for calling Covid-19 a Chinese virus? Just asking.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 27, 2022, 10:58:49 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 27, 2022, 09:33:17 AM
.. only I know that conspiracy theorists are impervious to facts.

;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 11:14:51 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 27, 2022, 10:29:01 AM
Okay, but then again why is it not kosher to call a disease which originated in a Chinese food market and nowhere else in the world, a Chinese disease? Heck, the Spanish flu did not originate in Spain yet a century later the term is being used without the Spanish government or the Spaniards making any fuss about it. Why then should people today be reprimanded for calling Covid-19 a Chinese virus? Just asking.

Because that is suggesting blame for the confluence of random events, the kind which can - and will - occur anywhere.

It also stokes racist attitudes already existing in many and makes targets of racism of any vaguey Asian looking person, all of whom are manifestly without blame of creating a virus. As was seen during Trump's idiocy of trying to insist on it being called The China Virus. He wasn't striving for geographical accuracy, he was throwing red meat to his racist base.

How would you feel if...etc etc
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 27, 2022, 11:34:38 AM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 11:14:51 AM
Because that is suggesting blame for the confluence of random events, the kind which can - and will - occur anywhere.

As far as I understand it spread there because the Chinese eat wild animals in an area where some wild animals carry these vira. So this epidemy would not originate wherever.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 11:40:18 AM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 27, 2022, 11:34:38 AM
As far as I understand it spread there because the Chinese eat wild animals in an area where some wild animals carry these vira. So this epidemy would not originate wherever.

This specific one? Possibly, but I'm not even sure that's true.

But what I meant was any type of pandemic source.

If the first cases and spread of the 1918 Influenza epidemic where in America...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: prémont on July 27, 2022, 12:00:41 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 11:40:18 AM
This specific one? Possibly, but I'm not even sure that's true.

But what I meant was any type of pandemic source.

Of course other pandemics may originate everywhere, but consensus seems to say, that this specific type originated in Wuhan. And there is no latent discrimination in recognizing this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 12:07:00 PM
Everybody already recognizes this. That's not in question.

Biut naming the virus after the country suggests blame. And blame for the citizenry.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 27, 2022, 12:24:00 PM
Quote from: (: premont :) on July 27, 2022, 12:00:41 PM
Of course other pandemics may originate everywhere, but consensus seems to say, that this specific type originated in Wuhan. And there is no latent discrimination in recognizing this.

That much is certainly true. So perhaps referring to it as the "Wuhan virus" is not undue.

Quote from: Florestan on July 27, 2022, 10:29:01 AM
Okay, but then again why is it not kosher to call a disease which originated in a Chinese food market and nowhere else in the world, a Chinese disease? Heck, the Spanish flu did not originate in Spain yet a century later the term is being used without the Spanish government or the Spaniards making any fuss about it. Why then should people today be reprimanded for calling Covid-19 a Chinese virus? Just asking.

Mi amigo, you can see yourself that the "Spanish flu" is water long under the bridge now, as you well understand. I doubt that its use was clean of bigotry at the time of its coinage. Even short of the vile "Kung Flu" which one still hears prominent Republican bigots use, let's just say I'm skeptical of the suggestion that "Chinese flu" can be granted free currency without tickling bigoted impulses, and I'm thoroughly skeptical of the need to try to "sanitize" its use.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 27, 2022, 12:25:44 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 12:07:00 PM
Everybody already recognizes this. That's not in question.

Biut naming the virus after the country suggests blame. And blame for the citizenry.

Worth remembering the uptick of harrassment of Asian-Americans in the wake of the onset of the plague.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 01:02:46 PM
The "Othering" of Disease: Xenophobia During Past Pandemics (https://www.wiley.com/network/featured-content/the-othering-of-disease-xenophobia-during-past-pandemics)

[...]"What's in a Name?

Historically, people highlight foreignness in the naming of pathogens: it's the "Wuhan" flu or the "Chinese virus"; the "Ebola" virus, named after a river in the Democratic Republic of Congo; the "Spanish" influenza, even though that microbe didn't originate in Spain. Tellingly, it is rare that we apply this same naming convention to diseases with an "origin" close to home---after all, HIV was discovered in New York City, and MRSA first exploded in Boston.

Of course, this idea is ostensibly inaccurate and misleading. The "Spanish flu," for example, largely came to be associated with Spain for political reasons, not because the H1N1 virus originated there. As a recent CNN article explains, other countries hid news of the disease outbreak to avoid informing WWI enemies that their soldiers were sick. At the same time, Spain, a neutral participant in the war, didn't suppress news about the virus and subsequently created the false impression that the virus originated there.

While naming a disease after specific people, places or animals can be a strategy for promoting fear, it can also impart a sense of safety to the public. An 1865 book of newspaper cuttings from the Royal College of Physicians archive discussed how diseases were seen as having "belonged to the age of barbaric conquests or medieval dirt," and so, therefore, "the very horrors with which our Oriental friends invested the "Asiatic Cholera" made men incredulous as to its presence in this favored and enlightened region." In other words, something this monstrous and unknown could never happen here, only over there.

In today's case, the dangerous and illogical suggestion is that if the Coronavirus is "Chinese," then Chinese people should be blamed or avoided. Simultaneously, this creates a misplaced sense of security that the "other" will be affected more severely than they will. Not only does this promote racism and systemic inequality, but it can also halt preventative measures and safety guidelines in their tracks." [...]
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 27, 2022, 01:04:33 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 27, 2022, 10:29:01 AM
Okay, but then again why is it not kosher to call a disease which originated in a Chinese food market and nowhere else in the world, a Chinese disease? Heck, the Spanish flu did not originate in Spain yet a century later the term is being used without the Spanish government or the Spaniards making any fuss about it. Why then should people today be reprimanded for calling Covid-19 a Chinese virus? Just asking.

The term Spanish flu is not in common use anymore.

Meanwhile, Turkiye has recently asked for its name in English to be changed because it is sick of the association with a bird from the wrong side of the Atlantic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 27, 2022, 04:26:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 11:14:51 AM
Because that is suggesting blame for the confluence of random events, the kind which can - and will - occur anywhere.

Not quite random events though - in fact, reportedly (this from an interview with virologist Angela Rasmussen on PBS Newshour this evening) the original SARS virus (a.k.a. SARS-CoV-1) originated in Chinese wet markets, and the Chinese outlawed them in response. Yet the markets persisted, despite a law that was either not enforced at all, or inadequately enforced.

She made these statements in the course of countering the argument that the Chinese would like to blame the wet markets because it would be more embarrassing to them if the virus came from their lab. In fact, Rasmussen argued, the wet market origin theory points to a complete failure of Chinese public health policy, which should be at least as embarrassing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 04:34:54 PM
I'm including that as part of what I call " confluence of random events", because while the specific wet market issue may not be replicated in most other places the problem of "a law that was either not enforced at all, or inadequately enforced"  and "failures of health policy" very much are in large numbers of other areas pretty much everywhere.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 27, 2022, 05:35:26 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 04:34:54 PM
I'm including that as part of what I call " confluence of random events", because while the specific wet market issue may not be replicated in most other places the problem of "a law that was either not enforced at all, or inadequately enforced"  and "failures of health policy" very much are in large numbers of other areas pretty much everywhere.

Okay - I was keying in on what seemed to me an implication that this was something random, for which no one was really to *blame*. Contrarily, if the wet market theory is correct I would very much blame the Chinese government for failing to enforce their policy. If they had done so, there is a good chance that the virus would not have spread worldwide, but would likely have - at worst - been confined to a remote, rural part of China. Instead, thanks to the existence of such a market in one of their most heavily populated and cosmopolitan urban centers, we now have a continuing global health crisis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 28, 2022, 06:06:12 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 27, 2022, 01:04:33 PM
Turkiye has recently asked for its name in English to be changed because it is sick of the association with a bird from the wrong side of the Atlantic.

That's just Erdogan's latest publicity stunt. I very much doubt that ordinary Turks were outraged by, or sick of, Turkey (country) being associated with Turkey (bird) in English, or even considering it one of their biggest problems/concerns; I bet that the vast majority of them couldn't care less about it. And I also bet that the vast majority of English speakers around the world, both native and non-native, will continue to pronounce Turkiye as Turkey. The move achieves nothing except satisfying Erdogan's megalomaniac delusion that he's somehow restoring the power and grandeur of the Ottoman Empire.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 07:02:33 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 28, 2022, 06:06:12 AM
That's just Erdogan's latest publicity stunt. I very much doubt that ordinary Turks were outraged by, or sick of, Turkey (country) being associated with Turkey (bird) in English, or even considering it one of their biggest problems/concerns; I bet that the vast majority of them couldn't care less about it. And I also bet that the vast majority of English speakers around the world, both native and non-native, will continue to pronounce Turkiye as Turkey. The move achieves nothing except satisfying Erdogan's megalomaniac delusion that he's somehow restoring the power and grandeur of the Ottoman Empire.

Nonsense, to be sure.

As to your earlier post: Say you had Chinese guests in your home. Would you speak of COVID-19 as the "Chinese flu?" And if not, why would you use the phrase when there are no Chinese ears to hear it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 28, 2022, 08:09:21 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 28, 2022, 07:02:33 AM
As to your earlier post: Say you had Chinese guests in your home. Would you speak of COVID-19 as the "Chinese flu?"

Yes, why not? A virus which originated in China and China only is "Chinese", just as if a virus originated in Romania and Romania only would be "Romanian" --- in both cases the term indicating the geographical origin of the virus, not its ethnicity (an absurd notion). Historically, we had the Spanish flu, the Hong-Kong flu, the Taiwan flu, the Asian flu and the Russian flu --- and back then nobody made any fuss about the naming. What is so special today about China / Wuhan that they must be protected at all costs from having a "flu" which originated in, well, Wuhan, China attached to them?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 28, 2022, 09:31:54 AM
If that were it's official name, then yeah, me too. My friends from China wouldn't get offended because they aren't dumb. If a virus clearly came from America, then me getting offended at calling it the "American virus" once it's global would he dumb.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 09:32:56 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 28, 2022, 08:09:21 AM
Yes, why not? A virus which originated in China and China only is "Chinese"

As you seem determined to miss the point, and I don't have the energy to overcome such obstinacy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 28, 2022, 09:48:20 AM
I'd also add that someone putting national pride over friendship is indeed not a friend. So by getting offended and potentially ruining a friendship, it means they don't really highly regard you as a friend to begin with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on July 28, 2022, 10:09:37 AM
Quote from: greg on July 28, 2022, 09:48:20 AM
I'd also add that someone putting national pride over friendship is indeed not a friend. So by getting offended and potentially ruining a friendship, it means they don't really highly regard you as a friend to begin with.

Seems to me that same argument could be reversed just as easily: the Chinese guests could also say, if this "friend" insists on insulting our country in our presence, it means they don't really highly regard us as friends to begin with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 28, 2022, 10:45:09 AM
It's not an insult, though, it's a fact. Same if reversed (theoretical previously mentioned America Virus etc.)

Problem would be that they identify too strongly with their country of origin and then take personal offence, despite that it's just a fact.

We had slavery in this country, IMHO which is even worse than just killing people, it's the ultimate terrible thing one could do.

But if someone in another country wants to talk about it I won't take personal offense. Why? Because American is not my identity, I just happen to be born here. Ultimately we are just people talking about stuff.

I think by being nice you are throwing pearls before the swine, they wouldn't deserve your niceness if they are going to put identify with their country more strongly than they identify as your friend.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 01:38:49 PM
I guess I'm "old school" enough that I am puzzled when it appears necessary to recommend Consideration for others as a virtue to a Christian.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 28, 2022, 01:48:44 PM
Some of you don't seem to understand that "Chinese" is used to convey "belonging to China", not simply "geographically located in China".

Florestan would not cease to be Romanian if he travelled here, and I would not become Romanian if I flew to Bucharest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 28, 2022, 06:02:46 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 28, 2022, 08:09:21 AM
Yes, why not? A virus which originated in China and China only is "Chinese", just as if a virus originated in Romania and Romania only would be "Romanian" --- in both cases the term indicating the geographical origin of the virus, not its ethnicity (an absurd notion). Historically, we had the Spanish flu, the Hong-Kong flu, the Taiwan flu, the Asian flu and the Russian flu --- and back then nobody made any fuss about the naming. What is so special today about China / Wuhan that they must be protected at all costs from having a "flu" which originated in, well, Wuhan, China attached to them?

I was hoping you were going to engage with some of my replies rather than just jumping over them.

Quote from: greg on July 28, 2022, 09:31:54 AM
If that were it's official name, then yeah, me too. My friends from China wouldn't get offended because they aren't dumb. If a virus clearly came from America, then me getting offended at calling it the "American virus" once it's global would he dumb.

I'm loving the blissful ignorance of that "if".

So for both of you I will repost this one:

Quote from: SimonNZ on July 27, 2022, 01:02:46 PM
The "Othering" of Disease: Xenophobia During Past Pandemics (https://www.wiley.com/network/featured-content/the-othering-of-disease-xenophobia-during-past-pandemics)

[...]"What's in a Name?

Historically, people highlight foreignness in the naming of pathogens: it's the "Wuhan" flu or the "Chinese virus"; the "Ebola" virus, named after a river in the Democratic Republic of Congo; the "Spanish" influenza, even though that microbe didn't originate in Spain. Tellingly, it is rare that we apply this same naming convention to diseases with an "origin" close to home---after all, HIV was discovered in New York City, and MRSA first exploded in Boston.

Of course, this idea is ostensibly inaccurate and misleading. The "Spanish flu," for example, largely came to be associated with Spain for political reasons, not because the H1N1 virus originated there. As a recent CNN article explains, other countries hid news of the disease outbreak to avoid informing WWI enemies that their soldiers were sick. At the same time, Spain, a neutral participant in the war, didn't suppress news about the virus and subsequently created the false impression that the virus originated there.

While naming a disease after specific people, places or animals can be a strategy for promoting fear, it can also impart a sense of safety to the public. An 1865 book of newspaper cuttings from the Royal College of Physicians archive discussed how diseases were seen as having "belonged to the age of barbaric conquests or medieval dirt," and so, therefore, "the very horrors with which our Oriental friends invested the "Asiatic Cholera" made men incredulous as to its presence in this favored and enlightened region." In other words, something this monstrous and unknown could never happen here, only over there.

In today's case, the dangerous and illogical suggestion is that if the Coronavirus is "Chinese," then Chinese people should be blamed or avoided. Simultaneously, this creates a misplaced sense of security that the "other" will be affected more severely than they will. Not only does this promote racism and systemic inequality, but it can also halt preventative measures and safety guidelines in their tracks." [...]

And I will also ask what you would call the next virus to have its first cases in china? Will that also be "the China virus"? How is that helpful? Should SARS have been called "the China virus" also? And the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics?

Well, here's some stuff you can both start confusingly give all the title of "the America virus":


Many deadly viruses 'originated' from US, not China: reports (https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/609595-many-deadly-viruses-originated-from-us-not-china-reports)

"Fighting head over heels to stem the tide of the fast-spreading and lethal coronavirus, the Chinese authorities are perhaps unable to find time and remind the American media houses particularly that during the last few centuries, majority of the deadliest viruses have exploded within the United States, and not China, to claim millions of human lives.

However, one does come across a few angry Chinese bloggers busy pleading their country's case on globally-subscribed social media websites, whereby complaining of the strong biases and grudges the American and European media outlets have been nourishing against China, which is most likely to experience a sharp drop in its GDP, exports, imports and the influx of Foreign Direct Investment due to the coronavirus outbreak on its soil.

The situation has led to an abrupt cancelation of international flights to and fro China, closure of businesses by many multi-billion dollar American and European corporate giants on the Chinese soil; and hence a sharp reduction in demand for Chinese goods might lead to a shrinking trade volume of the country.

Moreover, nearly every nation on earth is currently looking at passengers travelling from China and landing on their soils with a suspicion, fearing they might be carrying the deadly virus that has found no cure till date. In china alone, the death toll has reached around 500, while 25 more countries have got coronavirus patients to treat.

The Chinese government and their media houses, taken aback by the rapid spread of coronavirus, are thus unable to answer their critics in the United States, which has itself been a source of some of the deadliest viral and bacterial diseases the planet has witnessed in recorded history.

Memories are certainly short!

The 2009-2010 flu pandemic, also called the H1N1 Influenza or the swine flu, had spread from the United States to wreak havoc in 206 countries of the world, leading to over 2,00,000 deaths.

National Public Radio (NPR), an American privately and publicly funded non-profit membership media organisation based in Washington DC, had shed enough light on this 2009-2010 flu pandemic in its November 26, 2013 report.

The NPR report had stated: "By the World Health Organization (WHO)'s official tally, the flu pandemic of 2009-10 killed 18,449 people around the world. Those are deaths of people who had laboratory-confirmed cases of the so-called swine flu. But a fresh analysis says the real toll was 10 times higher - up to 203,000 deaths. And maybe it was twice that, if you count people who died of things like heart attacks precipitated by the flu."

The 50-year old American Radio had added: "Let's take the conservative figure of 203,000. That's about the same as a normal flu season. So the figure confirms the popular impression that the H1N1 flu pandemic of 2009 was a paper tiger, as these things go. Or as one NPR listener suggested back in early 2010, the headline might be: "Despite Puffed-Up Fears, Swine Flu Was a complete and total bust." That's an odd complaint, of course - as though it would have been better if the 2009 pandemic had been more like the pandemic of 1918-19, which killed an estimated 50 million people around the world."

The NPR had further maintained: "But the current study, commissioned by the WHO, helps explain why the agency struggled so much to calibrate its response to that pandemic and find the right tone for its public messaging. WHO leaders were first criticised for taking too long to declare a pandemic when spread of the disease clearly met its definition. Then critics charged the agency with hyping the situation under pressure from vaccine makers who wanted to recoup their investment. The low number of laboratory-confirmed deaths - just 18,449 - added to the confusion, a team of global health researchers write Tuesday in the journal PLOS Medicine: "This modest number has caused many to wonder what all the excitement was about, and some to question whether the pandemic response was excessive."

By the way, as research shows - by September 1, 2009 - the World Health Organization had reported that H1N1 influenza had been confirmed in over 200,000 people in more than 100 countries and that they are aware of at least 2185 confirmed deaths.

By November 15, 2009, more than 206 countries and overseas territories or communities had reported laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009, including over 6770 deaths.

By December 22, 2009, every European country, barring five exceptions like San Marino and Vatican City, had confirmed deaths.

France had 27; Spain, 33; Norway, 29; Italy, 6; Belgium and Germany, 8; Sweden, 3; Malta and Greece, 3; Denmark, Finland, Hungary and Luxemburg, one each; Ireland and the Netherlands, 10, and the United Kingdom, 79.

The British government had suggested 55,000 new cases in the week up to July 16, 2009.

In Pakistan, the National Institute of Health, Islamabad, had tested and confirmed 679 cases, whereby 39 deaths were reported from 2009 till 2010.

Overall, throughout Asia, the 2009 flu pandemic had afflicted at least 394,133 people, with 2,137 confirmed deaths.

There were 1,035 deaths confirmed in India, 737 deaths in China, 415 deaths in Turkey, 192 deaths in Thailand and 170 deaths in South Korea. Among the Asian countries, South Korea had the most confirmed cases, followed by China, Hong Kong and Thailand.

A WHO report of February 24, 2010 had asserted: "After early outbreaks in North America in April 2009 the new influenza virus spread rapidly around the world. By the time WHO declared a pandemic in June 2009, a total of 74 countries and territories had reported laboratory confirmed infections."

Meanwhile, the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had estimated that from April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, there were 60.8 million cases, 274,304 hospitalisations and 12,469 deaths.

This American department had estimated that between 151,700 and 575,400 people had died worldwide from this virus.

Research shows that in March 2009, the first human infection with new influenza or H1N1 virus was detected in the American state of California. By May 2009, some 980 schools across the US were hit by this virus, affecting 607,778 students. By June 19, 2009, all 50 American states were affected.

By September 2009, more than 1,000 test kits had been shipped to 120 domestic and 250 international laboratories in 140 countries.

Between April 2009 and April 2010, the US government had held 60 related media events – 39 press briefings and 22 tele-briefings - reaching more than 35,000 participants.

And on August 10, 2010, WHO had declared an end to this influenza pandemic.

History of deadly viruses in the United States, mostly home-grown:

According to the San Francisco-based "Healthline Media", an American website and provider of health, smallpox came to North America in the 1600's. People had symptoms of high fever, chills, severe back pain, and rashes. In 1721, at least 844 people having smallpox had perished.

In 1770, Edward Jenner developed a vaccine from cow pox. It helped the body become immune to smallpox without causing the disease. After a large vaccination initiative in 1972, smallpox is gone from the United States. In fact, vaccines are no longer necessary.

The 1793 Yellow fever from the Caribbean:

Philadelphia, once the nation's capital and its busiest port, was the source of this virus, spread by Mosquitoes.

Over 5,000 people died, and 17,000 fled the city.

A vaccine was eventually developed and then licensed in 1953. One vaccine is enough for life.

While yellow fever has no cure, someone who does recover from the illness, becomes immune for the rest of their life.

The 1832-1866 Cholera waves:

The United States had three serious waves of cholera, an infection of the intestine, between 1832 and 1866. The pandemic began in India, and swiftly spread across the globe through trade routes. New York City was usually the first city to feel the impact. An estimated two to six Americans died per day during the outbreak.

The last documented outbreak in the United States was in 1911. Cholera still causes nearly 130,000 deaths a year worldwide, according to the US government.

Although modern sewage and water treatment have helped eradicated Cholera in some countries, the virus is still present elsewhere. The 1858 Scarlet fever waves:

Scarlet fever is a bacterial infection that can occur after strep throat. Like cholera, scarlet fever epidemics came in waves. During the 1858 epidemic, 95 per cent of people who caught the virus were children. Research shows that improvements in public health were more likely the cause of eradication of this disease, and not just improved nutrition.

The 1906-1907 "Typhoid Mary":

One of the biggest typhoid fever epidemics of all time broke out between 1906 and 1907 in New York.

A cook called Mary Mallon, often referred to as "Typhoid Mary", had reportedly spread the virus to about 122 New Yorkers during her time as a chef on an estate and in a hospital unit. About five of those 122 New Yorkers passed away from the virus. Annually, 10,771 people passed away from typhoid fever.

Medical testing showed that Mallon was a healthy carrier for typhoid fever. Typhoid fever causes sickness and red spots to form on the chest and abdomen. A vaccine was then developed in 1911, and an antibiotic treatment for typhoid fever became available in 1948.

The 1918 "Spanish Flu":

This catastrophe had killed 675,000 Americans.

This mutating influenza virus actually did not come from Spain. It circulates the globe annually, but seriously affected the United States in 1918. The flu returned later in 1957 as the "Asian flu" and cause nearly 70,000 deaths before a vaccine became available.

The 1921-1925 Diphtheria epidemic:

This virus had killed over 15,520 people at its peak, before a vaccine was developed during the same period.

Diphtheria caused swelling of the mucous membranes and obstructed breathing and swallowing.

Today more than 80 per cent of children in the United States are vaccinated.

The 1916-1955 Polio peak:

Some 3145 people had died in United States during 1952 due to polio, which affects the human nervous system, causing paralysis. The first major polio epidemic in the United States occurred in 1916 and reached its peak in 1952.

In 1955, Dr Jonas Salk had developed a vaccine. The United States has been polio-free since 1979. In fact, Pakistan and just a couple of more unfortunate nations are still struggling to eradicate polio.

The 1981-1991 Measles outbreak:

Between this period, between 2000 and 10,000 people had died from measles.

The 1993 contaminated water in the US state of Milwaukee.

This had led to 100 deaths, although over 0.4 million people were affected.

The 2010-2014 Whooping Cough disease:

More than 10 infants had perished due to this terrible cough between 2010 and 2014, though 10,000 cases were reported across the US.

The HIV/AIDS Syndrome since 1980's:

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a chronic, potentially life-threatening condition caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

This is a leading cause of early death. About 1.2 million people in United States alone have this disease.

The AIDS epidemic had found its way to the United States as early as 1960, but was first noticed after doctors discovered it in gay men in Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco in 1981.

Globally, according to the United Nations, 37.9 million [32.7 million-44.0 million] people were living with HIV in 2018.

And around 770 000 [570 000-1.1 million] people had died from AIDS-related illnesses by the end of 2018.

In the early 2000s - 2004 to 2005, global deaths reached their peak at almost 2 million per year.

From the 1990s through to the early 2000s, it was the cause of greater than 1-in-3 deaths in several countries. In Zimbabwe, it accounted for more than half of annual deaths in the late 1990s."

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 28, 2022, 06:05:34 PM
Brilliant work, Simon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 06:06:31 PM
The idea that our Chinese friends would find such usage offensive only if they're "dumb" is signally dull-witted.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 06:07:57 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 28, 2022, 06:05:34 PM
Brilliant work, Simon.

Yes. How much do you bet neither greg nor Andrei troubles to read it?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 28, 2022, 06:12:17 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 28, 2022, 06:02:46 PM
I was hoping you were going to engage with some of my replies rather than just jumping over them.

I'm loving the blissful ignorance of that "if".

So for both of you I will repost this one:

And I will also ask what you would call the next virus to have its first cases in china? Will that also be "the China virus"? How is that helpful? Should SARS have been called "the China virus" also? And the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics?

Well, here's some stuff you can both start confusingly give all the title of "the America virus":


Many deadly viruses 'originated' from US, not China: reports (https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/609595-many-deadly-viruses-originated-from-us-not-china-reports)

"Fighting head over heels to stem the tide of the fast-spreading and lethal coronavirus, the Chinese authorities are perhaps unable to find time and remind the American media houses particularly that during the last few centuries, majority of the deadliest viruses have exploded within the United States, and not China, to claim millions of human lives.

However, one does come across a few angry Chinese bloggers busy pleading their country's case on globally-subscribed social media websites, whereby complaining of the strong biases and grudges the American and European media outlets have been nourishing against China, which is most likely to experience a sharp drop in its GDP, exports, imports and the influx of Foreign Direct Investment due to the coronavirus outbreak on its soil.

The situation has led to an abrupt cancelation of international flights to and fro China, closure of businesses by many multi-billion dollar American and European corporate giants on the Chinese soil; and hence a sharp reduction in demand for Chinese goods might lead to a shrinking trade volume of the country.

Moreover, nearly every nation on earth is currently looking at passengers travelling from China and landing on their soils with a suspicion, fearing they might be carrying the deadly virus that has found no cure till date. In china alone, the death toll has reached around 500, while 25 more countries have got coronavirus patients to treat.

The Chinese government and their media houses, taken aback by the rapid spread of coronavirus, are thus unable to answer their critics in the United States, which has itself been a source of some of the deadliest viral and bacterial diseases the planet has witnessed in recorded history.

Memories are certainly short!

The 2009-2010 flu pandemic, also called the H1N1 Influenza or the swine flu, had spread from the United States to wreak havoc in 206 countries of the world, leading to over 2,00,000 deaths.

National Public Radio (NPR), an American privately and publicly funded non-profit membership media organisation based in Washington DC, had shed enough light on this 2009-2010 flu pandemic in its November 26, 2013 report.

The NPR report had stated: "By the World Health Organization (WHO)'s official tally, the flu pandemic of 2009-10 killed 18,449 people around the world. Those are deaths of people who had laboratory-confirmed cases of the so-called swine flu. But a fresh analysis says the real toll was 10 times higher - up to 203,000 deaths. And maybe it was twice that, if you count people who died of things like heart attacks precipitated by the flu."

The 50-year old American Radio had added: "Let's take the conservative figure of 203,000. That's about the same as a normal flu season. So the figure confirms the popular impression that the H1N1 flu pandemic of 2009 was a paper tiger, as these things go. Or as one NPR listener suggested back in early 2010, the headline might be: "Despite Puffed-Up Fears, Swine Flu Was a complete and total bust." That's an odd complaint, of course - as though it would have been better if the 2009 pandemic had been more like the pandemic of 1918-19, which killed an estimated 50 million people around the world."

The NPR had further maintained: "But the current study, commissioned by the WHO, helps explain why the agency struggled so much to calibrate its response to that pandemic and find the right tone for its public messaging. WHO leaders were first criticised for taking too long to declare a pandemic when spread of the disease clearly met its definition. Then critics charged the agency with hyping the situation under pressure from vaccine makers who wanted to recoup their investment. The low number of laboratory-confirmed deaths - just 18,449 - added to the confusion, a team of global health researchers write Tuesday in the journal PLOS Medicine: "This modest number has caused many to wonder what all the excitement was about, and some to question whether the pandemic response was excessive."

By the way, as research shows - by September 1, 2009 - the World Health Organization had reported that H1N1 influenza had been confirmed in over 200,000 people in more than 100 countries and that they are aware of at least 2185 confirmed deaths.

By November 15, 2009, more than 206 countries and overseas territories or communities had reported laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009, including over 6770 deaths.

By December 22, 2009, every European country, barring five exceptions like San Marino and Vatican City, had confirmed deaths.

France had 27; Spain, 33; Norway, 29; Italy, 6; Belgium and Germany, 8; Sweden, 3; Malta and Greece, 3; Denmark, Finland, Hungary and Luxemburg, one each; Ireland and the Netherlands, 10, and the United Kingdom, 79.

The British government had suggested 55,000 new cases in the week up to July 16, 2009.

In Pakistan, the National Institute of Health, Islamabad, had tested and confirmed 679 cases, whereby 39 deaths were reported from 2009 till 2010.

Overall, throughout Asia, the 2009 flu pandemic had afflicted at least 394,133 people, with 2,137 confirmed deaths.

There were 1,035 deaths confirmed in India, 737 deaths in China, 415 deaths in Turkey, 192 deaths in Thailand and 170 deaths in South Korea. Among the Asian countries, South Korea had the most confirmed cases, followed by China, Hong Kong and Thailand.

A WHO report of February 24, 2010 had asserted: "After early outbreaks in North America in April 2009 the new influenza virus spread rapidly around the world. By the time WHO declared a pandemic in June 2009, a total of 74 countries and territories had reported laboratory confirmed infections."

Meanwhile, the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had estimated that from April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, there were 60.8 million cases, 274,304 hospitalisations and 12,469 deaths.

This American department had estimated that between 151,700 and 575,400 people had died worldwide from this virus.

Research shows that in March 2009, the first human infection with new influenza or H1N1 virus was detected in the American state of California. By May 2009, some 980 schools across the US were hit by this virus, affecting 607,778 students. By June 19, 2009, all 50 American states were affected.

By September 2009, more than 1,000 test kits had been shipped to 120 domestic and 250 international laboratories in 140 countries.

Between April 2009 and April 2010, the US government had held 60 related media events – 39 press briefings and 22 tele-briefings - reaching more than 35,000 participants.

And on August 10, 2010, WHO had declared an end to this influenza pandemic.

History of deadly viruses in the United States, mostly home-grown:

According to the San Francisco-based "Healthline Media", an American website and provider of health, smallpox came to North America in the 1600's. People had symptoms of high fever, chills, severe back pain, and rashes. In 1721, at least 844 people having smallpox had perished.

In 1770, Edward Jenner developed a vaccine from cow pox. It helped the body become immune to smallpox without causing the disease. After a large vaccination initiative in 1972, smallpox is gone from the United States. In fact, vaccines are no longer necessary.

The 1793 Yellow fever from the Caribbean:

Philadelphia, once the nation's capital and its busiest port, was the source of this virus, spread by Mosquitoes.

Over 5,000 people died, and 17,000 fled the city.

A vaccine was eventually developed and then licensed in 1953. One vaccine is enough for life.

While yellow fever has no cure, someone who does recover from the illness, becomes immune for the rest of their life.

The 1832-1866 Cholera waves:

The United States had three serious waves of cholera, an infection of the intestine, between 1832 and 1866. The pandemic began in India, and swiftly spread across the globe through trade routes. New York City was usually the first city to feel the impact. An estimated two to six Americans died per day during the outbreak.

The last documented outbreak in the United States was in 1911. Cholera still causes nearly 130,000 deaths a year worldwide, according to the US government.

Although modern sewage and water treatment have helped eradicated Cholera in some countries, the virus is still present elsewhere. The 1858 Scarlet fever waves:

Scarlet fever is a bacterial infection that can occur after strep throat. Like cholera, scarlet fever epidemics came in waves. During the 1858 epidemic, 95 per cent of people who caught the virus were children. Research shows that improvements in public health were more likely the cause of eradication of this disease, and not just improved nutrition.

The 1906-1907 "Typhoid Mary":

One of the biggest typhoid fever epidemics of all time broke out between 1906 and 1907 in New York.

A cook called Mary Mallon, often referred to as "Typhoid Mary", had reportedly spread the virus to about 122 New Yorkers during her time as a chef on an estate and in a hospital unit. About five of those 122 New Yorkers passed away from the virus. Annually, 10,771 people passed away from typhoid fever.

Medical testing showed that Mallon was a healthy carrier for typhoid fever. Typhoid fever causes sickness and red spots to form on the chest and abdomen. A vaccine was then developed in 1911, and an antibiotic treatment for typhoid fever became available in 1948.

The 1918 "Spanish Flu":

This catastrophe had killed 675,000 Americans.

This mutating influenza virus actually did not come from Spain. It circulates the globe annually, but seriously affected the United States in 1918. The flu returned later in 1957 as the "Asian flu" and cause nearly 70,000 deaths before a vaccine became available.

The 1921-1925 Diphtheria epidemic:

This virus had killed over 15,520 people at its peak, before a vaccine was developed during the same period.

Diphtheria caused swelling of the mucous membranes and obstructed breathing and swallowing.

Today more than 80 per cent of children in the United States are vaccinated.

The 1916-1955 Polio peak:

Some 3145 people had died in United States during 1952 due to polio, which affects the human nervous system, causing paralysis. The first major polio epidemic in the United States occurred in 1916 and reached its peak in 1952.

In 1955, Dr Jonas Salk had developed a vaccine. The United States has been polio-free since 1979. In fact, Pakistan and just a couple of more unfortunate nations are still struggling to eradicate polio.

The 1981-1991 Measles outbreak:

Between this period, between 2000 and 10,000 people had died from measles.

The 1993 contaminated water in the US state of Milwaukee.

This had led to 100 deaths, although over 0.4 million people were affected.

The 2010-2014 Whooping Cough disease:

More than 10 infants had perished due to this terrible cough between 2010 and 2014, though 10,000 cases were reported across the US.

The HIV/AIDS Syndrome since 1980's:

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a chronic, potentially life-threatening condition caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

This is a leading cause of early death. About 1.2 million people in United States alone have this disease.

The AIDS epidemic had found its way to the United States as early as 1960, but was first noticed after doctors discovered it in gay men in Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco in 1981.

Globally, according to the United Nations, 37.9 million [32.7 million-44.0 million] people were living with HIV in 2018.

And around 770 000 [570 000-1.1 million] people had died from AIDS-related illnesses by the end of 2018.

In the early 2000s - 2004 to 2005, global deaths reached their peak at almost 2 million per year.

From the 1990s through to the early 2000s, it was the cause of greater than 1-in-3 deaths in several countries. In Zimbabwe, it accounted for more than half of annual deaths in the late 1990s."



Thanks for all this!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 12:07:15 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 28, 2022, 06:07:57 PM
Yes. How much do you bet neither greg nor Andrei troubles to read it?

I did read the whole whataboutism. What I wont't trouble to is respond.

Btw, the 1957 pandemic was called the "Asian flu" and the 1968 one was the "Hong Kong flu".



Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 12:23:38 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 28, 2022, 01:48:44 PM
Some of you don't seem to understand that "Chinese" is used to convey "belonging to China", not simply "geographically located in China".

By this token, a car, a battery or indeed anything "made in China" can be called Chinese only if it stays within China or is owned by a Chinese living abroad. As soon as a Frenchman living in Toulouse buys the car, it ceases to be Chinese because it neither belongs to China anymore nor is it geographically located in China.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on July 29, 2022, 12:27:59 AM
Damn, just reading this thread has become a bigger health hazard than Corona.... ;)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 29, 2022, 12:52:21 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 12:07:15 AM
I did read the whole whataboutism. What I wont't trouble to is respond.

Btw, the 1957 pandemic was called the "Asian flu" and the 1968 one was the "Hong Kong flu".

Weak.

And that those two were given those names was THE POINT of that article on the "othering", of disease. A point you still missed though I posted it twice.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 03:50:01 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 12:23:38 AM
By this token, a car, a battery or indeed anything "made in China" can be called Chinese only if it stays within China or is owned by a Chinese living abroad. As soon as a Frenchman living in Toulouse buys the car, it ceases to be Chinese because it neither belongs to China anymore nor is it geographically located in China.

Diseases are not like goods that you seek to buy.

This stuff matters, Andrei. In the West there are people who still think that AIDS is a "gay disease" just because of who happened to be the person who brought the disease to the West, and possibly the same thing will happen with monkeypox. In both cases Africans would find that idea laughable. It's designed to attribute the disease to the other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 04:44:47 AM
Quote from: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 03:50:01 AM
Diseases are not like goods that you seek to buy.

This stuff matters, Andrei. In the West there are people who still think that AIDS is a "gay disease" just because of who happened to be the person who brought the disease to the West, and possibly the same thing will happen with monkeypox. In both cases Africans would find that idea laughable. It's designed to attribute the disease to the other.

How could stating the scientifically established fact that Covid-19 originated in a wet market in Wuhan, China be an insult to the Chinese people, or imply that they are to be blamed collectively for it? I really don't understand.  Btw, is the term monkeypox an insult to monkeys?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 05:00:48 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 04:44:47 AM
How could stating the scientifically established fact that Covid-19 originated in a wet market in Wuhan, China be an insult to the Chinese people, or imply that they are to be blamed collectively for it? I really don't understand.  Btw, is the term monkeypox an insult to monkeys?

We were not talking about the established fact that human transmission started in Wuhan (the virus originated in bats, not Chinese people). We were talking about calling it Chinese virus, taking ONE particular fact about the virus and turning it into the defining characteristic.

And please don't equate insulting human beings with insulting animals.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 29, 2022, 05:05:58 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 04:44:47 AMHow could stating the scientifically established fact that Covid-19 originated in a wet market in Wuhan, China be an insult to the Chinese people, or imply that they are to be blamed collectively for it?

It cannot.  Concerns about such matters are entirely unfounded and unjustified.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 29, 2022, 05:40:15 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 04:44:47 AM
I really don't understand. 

I don't believe you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 29, 2022, 07:02:55 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 04:44:47 AM
How could stating the scientifically established fact that Covid-19 originated in a wet market in Wuhan, China be an insult to the Chinese people, or imply that they are to be blamed collectively for it? I really don't understand.

It is not. And for the Nth time that is not the res. It's a matter of (related to) name-calling.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2022, 07:21:24 AM
A name should be specific and descriptive. The virus was initially named SARS-CoV-2, indicating it was a variant of the previously identified SARS virus. The disease named coronavirus disease 2019, contracted to Covid-19. These meet the criteria.

Obviously you can call it whatever you want, but the Chinese virus seems particularly dumb, since the virus almost certainly evolved naturally in bats, which don't have any nationality (a similar virus, MERS-Cov was transferred from bats to humans in the middle east). There are been a number of viral diseases which were first observed in China. "The Chinese virus" is neither specific nor descriptive. Calling it the Wuhan virus would be more reasonable, because that name would be specific and to some extent descriptive. When Trump started calling it "The Chinese virus" it was a transparent attempt to deflect blame for his incompetent and incoherent response to the pandemic.

(Now, if you will excuse me, I'm going to list to the Austrian Symphony. What? You don't know what I'm talking about. Beethoven's fifth symphony was premiered in Vienna, so obviously it is the Austrian Symphony. Don't be a pedant.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 07:28:27 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2022, 07:21:24 AM
Calling it the Wuhan virus would be more reasonable, because that name would be specific and to some extent descriptive.

Agreed.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 29, 2022, 07:29:53 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2022, 07:21:24 AMNow, if you will excuse me, I'm going to list to the Austrian Symphony. What? You don't know what I'm talking about.

This would make me think you would listen to a recording by the Austrian Symphony Orchestra, unless you specify another orchestra.

(https://i.discogs.com/I1nB-5juWgJM2FvpUXzC4A5td6WqeG9HQojV3sVSRpw/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:600/w:600/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTE5NDgx/ODQyLTE2MjYyMDc2/MDEtNTczMy5qcGVn.jpeg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 07:33:59 AM
Quote from: krummholz on July 27, 2022, 04:26:06 PM
Not quite random events though - in fact, reportedly (this from an interview with virologist Angela Rasmussen on PBS Newshour this evening) the original SARS virus (a.k.a. SARS-CoV-1) originated in Chinese wet markets, and the Chinese outlawed them in response. Yet the markets persisted, despite a law that was either not enforced at all, or inadequately enforced.

She made these statements in the course of countering the argument that the Chinese would like to blame the wet markets because it would be more embarrassing to them if the virus came from their lab. In fact, Rasmussen argued, the wet market origin theory points to a complete failure of Chinese public health policy, which should be at least as embarrassing.

This. The ordinary people of Wuhan, or of China at large, bear no responsibility for the pandemic. On the other hand, the Wuhan authorities and the central Chinese authorities are hugely responsible for it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on July 29, 2022, 03:23:05 PM
The Omicron variant will in future be referred to by you as "the South Africa virus", right?

Yes, I am going to belabor this.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 10:32:11 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on July 29, 2022, 03:23:05 PM
The Omicron variant will in future be referred to by you as "the South Africa virus", right?

It would possibly be better if you didn't belabor it at this point, but I would note that The Conversation podcast had a very interesting episode discussing with the people in South Africa who discovered Omicron, and the implications of the sort of reaction that they got.

Other countries banned travel from southern Africa when there was no basis for thinking that Omicron was actually confined to there (and subsequently it was proved that it wasn't confined), it was just that the South African scientists were the ones paying enough attention to some results to investigate further. Some of them got death threats from South Africans who were upset at them for reporting the existence of Omicron, because of the travel bans that resulted.

It's a very thought-provoking discussion about the massive problems with shooting the messenger. Having serious disincentives for reporting results is not good for science.

The way people think about these things is completely bizarre. We had the whole thing of blaming Asian people in the early stages of the pandemic, with some people having zero ability to think that people of Chinese appearance might not have been anywhere near China and it was perfectly possible for non-Asian people to have been in China.

But what struck me even more as the pandemic developed was the number of times I witnessed people hugging and cuddling their friends, including saying how they hadn't seen them for a long time. These same people showed signs of avoiding strangers, but some part of their brain seemed to implicitly believe that the virus could recognise faces and would hold off it saw that it was your friend you were too close to. I mean, a couple of times I wanted to go up these embraces and point out that neither of them had a damn clue where the other had been.

Geographical location starts off being relevant, but in a global pandemic it becomes utterly nuts to keep referring to what is now one of the least important things about the virus and giving it primacy.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 10:35:12 PM
As for the obsession with wet markets, it's basically another case of racist othering of what you might call a farmers' market or just "market" in other parts of the world. It's simply a linguistic difference where markets are known as 'wet' or 'dry', not 'farmers' or 'super': https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-17/what-are-wet-markets-in-china/12159920
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on July 30, 2022, 09:49:56 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 28, 2022, 06:06:31 PM
The idea that our Chinese friends would find such usage offensive only if they're "dumb" is signally dull-witted.
Why? Break down your reasoning of this.
They aren't responsible for the virus at all, why should they be offended?

As I said, a virus from America called the "America virus" would not offend me at all. It shouldn't. So why don't I get to apply the same standard to them?

If I play by the game of these fictional guests at getting offended at anything:
1) they will be appear insufferable and make me feel like I always have to be formal and non-offensive, which is the opposite you want to do if trying to make friends. Since their offensive is outside the scope of rationality, it will feel like anything I say can be warped to be offensive, so I will just feel like resigning and saying nothing and just leaving.
2) they open up the possibility that now they know they can make me do things that are illogical to respect their illogical feelings, which opens the door to manipulation in case they turned out to be malevolent


You can call that dumb all you want. But there's good reason many people would be turned off at someone being offended by something totally illogical.


edit: also, would you really get offended at a Chinese person mentioning that America had slavery? I doubt it.
If their logic is, anything that is negative about my country, you can't say, then why not adopt that logic yourself? It's toxic nationalism, but why not?
If you play by their rules but don't apply it both ways, then you are putting yourself in a submissive position. Rules for you, not for them. You really wanna do that? Or do you want to be friends with them?


Quote from: Spotted Horses on July 29, 2022, 07:21:24 AM
Calling it the Wuhan virus would be more reasonable, because that name would be specific and to some extent descriptive.
Very true.



Quote from: Madiel on July 29, 2022, 10:35:12 PM
As for the obsession with wet markets, it's basically another case of racist othering of what you might call a farmers' market or just "market" in other parts of the world.
Racist, why? How? Why not use a different word to distinguish between a market that sells exotic meat vs. a market which doesn't?
If you aren't Chinese, then I don't see how you get to call it racist. The best way to determine this would be to have to take a general poll to see what they think.


Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 28, 2022, 06:07:57 PM
Yes. How much do you bet neither greg nor Andrei troubles to read it?
It doesn't appear to have anything to do with my points...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 30, 2022, 12:52:06 PM
Quote from: Florestan on July 29, 2022, 07:28:27 AM
Agreed.



     That's not good enough because it doesn't strongly indict lying Commie bastards. It makes the outbreak a natural disaster bungled by local auth0rities that could have happened anywhere before lying Commie bastards covered it up. No, we need stronger stuff. I know!! Let's put a lying Commie virology lab funded by US liberals in there! Now that'll do the trick.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on July 30, 2022, 04:53:18 PM
Quote from: greg on July 30, 2022, 09:49:56 AM
Why not use a different word to distinguish between a market that sells exotic meat vs. a market which doesn't?

Are you asking why Chinese languages have not bothered to make a distinction to suit you on the other side of the world, or why a lot of English-language media has been too lazy to say "a market selling exotic meat" instead of latching onto a phrase that sounds exotic?

I look forward to an Italian asking you why you use the word "blue" for two different colours.

EDIT: Mind you, you don't even have to leave the English language to find examples of things where one group makes a distinction and another group doesn't. "Cilantro" is unknown here. It's coriander. Conversely, you use the words "squash" and "peppers" in ways that seem completely indiscriminate. Why not use a different word to distinguish all those "squash"?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 30, 2022, 07:56:45 PM

     How does Biden get the Rona twice in a few days when I can't seem to get it in more than 2 years? Not only that, but That One Over There watching SNL hasn't got it either and she worked with a bunch of people who all got it. It's beyond everything and everything else, too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 30, 2022, 08:19:32 PM
Quote from: drogulus on July 30, 2022, 07:56:45 PM
     How does Biden get the Rona twice in a few days when I can't seem to get it in more than 2 years? Not only that, but That One Over There watching SNL hasn't got it either and she worked with a bunch of people who all got it. It's beyond everything and everything else, too.

Good for you for giving it a miss.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 31, 2022, 04:27:55 AM
Quote from: Deborah Birx, White House COVID-19 Response CoordinatorI knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. And I think we overplayed the vaccines.

July 22, 2022.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on July 31, 2022, 11:01:30 AM
Quote from: drogulus on July 30, 2022, 12:52:06 PM
     That's not good enough because it doesn't strongly indict lying Commie bastards. It makes the outbreak a natural disaster bungled by local auth0rities that could have happened anywhere before lying Commie bastards covered it up. No, we need stronger stuff. I know!! Let's put a lying Commie virology lab funded by US liberals in there! Now that'll do the trick.

You can't even begin to understand what Communism means and does. I say, even if you're a hardcore atheist you should still praise the Lord that your country was never ruled by Communists.

Valid for many GMGers.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on July 31, 2022, 11:25:37 AM
Quote from: Florestan on July 31, 2022, 11:01:30 AM
You can't even begin to understand what Communism means and does. I say, even if you're a hardcore atheist you should still praise the Lord that your country was never ruled by Communists.

Valid for many GMGers.


     I sacrifice a white bull to Jupiter at least once a month to keep me safe from lying Commie bastards. That's because I treat Communism as another false religion, kinda like all the others only more fierce (sometimes). So, we partially agree. Where we disagree is probably about what Hitch said about the celestial N. Korea being worse on account of at least the Kims leave you in peace after you die.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on August 01, 2022, 06:40:16 PM
Quote from: Madiel on July 30, 2022, 04:53:18 PM
or why a lot of English-language media has been too lazy to say "a market selling exotic meat" instead of latching onto a phrase that sounds exotic?
They should call it an exotic meat market.
But... maybe not.
Hmmm then that sounds like a name of a weird gay bar.  :D

The English name sucks. What is a "wet market," a market were they sell water? Or videos of people's weird fetish of wetting themselves?

How about... exotic animal grocer?


Quote from: Madiel on July 30, 2022, 04:53:18 PM
Are you asking why Chinese languages have not bothered to make a distinction to suit you on the other side of the world
No... what even is the Chinese word? I would be surprised if it were actually translated as "farmer's market."
Ha... don't get me started on languages, though. I have been wondering lately how many wild words Chinese has that English doesn't have- since the more I continue in my Japanese studies, the more I notice these advanced words which are extremely niche and unexpected, and often they are derived from Chinese kanji combinations, and many more synonyms than you'd expect.
I bet they have multiple words for "wet market."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on August 04, 2022, 04:24:02 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on July 20, 2022, 02:06:42 AM
Numbers of identified cases have now been pretty stable for a month here in DK, including after the recent growth of BA5 - around 2000 - 3000 daily.

BA 2.75 now considered the latest, more contagious variant here.

BA 2.75 receded, against expectations, into almost nothing, and is no longer considered important.

Case numbers also generally going down somewhat here in DK, in spite of the rise back in early summer.

So: patterns not necessarily predictable. But we've had a lot of sunny and hot weather recently.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on August 04, 2022, 05:12:10 AM
The current omicron wave in Australia, in winter, may have peaked sooner (and lower) than was expected.

I'm trying to dodge for another 5 days before my appointment for a booster vaccination...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 16, 2022, 04:55:22 PM
CDC relaxes COVID-19 guidelines, drops quarantine and social distancing recommendations (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/cdc-relaxes-covid-19-guidelines-drops-quarantine-and-social-distancing-recommendations)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 16, 2022, 05:08:28 PM
Quote from: Madiel on August 04, 2022, 05:12:10 AM
The current omicron wave in Australia, in winter, may have peaked sooner (and lower) than was expected.

I'm trying to dodge for another 5 days before my appointment for a booster vaccination...

Good luck!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on August 17, 2022, 02:06:54 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 16, 2022, 05:08:28 PM
Good luck!

Well the booster shot was over a week ago now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 17, 2022, 04:57:46 AM
Good.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 19, 2022, 08:47:56 AM
Biden Administration Plans for End of Covid-19 Shot, Treatment Coverage (https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/16/health/biden-administration-covid-19-vaccines-tests-treatments/index.html)


Quote from: White House Covid-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish JhaMy hope is that in 2023, you're going to see the commercialization of almost all of these products. Some of that is actually going to begin this fall, in the days and weeks ahead. You're going to see commercialization of some of these things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 19, 2022, 02:51:23 PM
Are lockdown effects 'killing more people than Covid'?

Excess deaths data has blown open debate about pandemic restrictions (https://www.theweek.co.uk/covid-19/957702/after-effects-lockdown-killing-more-people-covid)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on August 19, 2022, 04:28:06 PM

     The Chinese lockdowns that are prematurely destroying the economy are due to the failure of the Chinese vaccine, and the decision not to beg for help from the capitalist ghouls.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on August 20, 2022, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: Todd on August 19, 2022, 02:51:23 PM
Are lockdown effects 'killing more people than Covid'?

Excess deaths data has blown open debate about pandemic restrictions (https://www.theweek.co.uk/covid-19/957702/after-effects-lockdown-killing-more-people-covid)

The UK lockdowns ended quite some time ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on August 22, 2022, 02:50:36 AM
Quote from: Madiel on August 20, 2022, 07:00:39 PM
The UK lockdowns ended quite some time ago.
It's interesting: I lean in no direction as to the wisdom of these things but here in Japan we've had no lockdowns ever. We do live in a total continual mask culture to this day everywhere, inside and outside. Despite the fact that Japanese are weirdly somewhat anti-vax we have been able to get vaccinated 3 times (too slowly). But, no lockdowns in Japan.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on August 22, 2022, 06:56:33 AM
One of the most unfortunate things about American culture vis. the pandemic is the degree to which masking and mask mandates have become equated to "Big Brother forcing me to do something I don't want to do". People here are so utterly sick of anything to do with pandemic mitigation that the percentage of people masking up in crowded stores here in Vermont is now under 10%. I was at a Costco last week where the ONLY people I saw wearing masks (other than myself) were some of the store staff - and even among the staff, mask wearers were in the minority.

Edited to add: the CDC has not helped matters by using "community levels" instead of "community transmission levels" to define degree of risk across the US. "Community level" seems to be a measure of the degree of strain on the health care system; while "community transmission level" is more relevant to one's risk of contracting the virus without adopting some mitigation measure like masking. "Community level" is low nearly everywhere, thanks largely to nearly everyone having some immunity to the virus; but community transmission levels are high enough in many places to justify calling this a surge (of the BA.5 variant). And while serious illness and death are not as widespread as they once were, people are still developing Long COVID.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on August 22, 2022, 07:37:55 AM
August 17th: Walensky, Citing Botched Pandemic Response, Calls for C.D.C. Reorganization (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/17/us/politics/cdc-rochelle-walensky-covid.html)

August 22nd: Fauci Says He Will Step Down in December to Pursue His 'Next Chapter' (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/fauci-retire.html)

Unrelated stories.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on August 22, 2022, 04:33:39 PM
Given that Fauci is not at the CDC, they are indeed unrelated.  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 24, 2022, 07:59:33 AM
And, in non-surprising news:
High levels of immunity with COVID-19 vaccines have helped avoid 'excess mortality' in Mass., study says (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/23/metro/high-levels-immunity-with-covid-19-vaccines-have-helped-avoid-excess-mortality-mass-study-says/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 28, 2022, 07:50:03 AM
How long covid reshapes the brain — and how we might treat it (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/08/25/long-covid-brain-science-fog-recovery/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 31, 2022, 06:23:35 AM
US clears updated COVID boosters targeting newest variants (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/31/nation/us-clears-updated-covid-19-boosters-targeting-newest-omicron-strain-shots-could-begin-within-days/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on August 31, 2022, 06:33:39 AM
US life expectancy drops largely due to Covid. An analyst observes that the greater drop in life expectancy for white Americans could reflect attitudes in some parts of the country to vaccines and pandemic control measures.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/08/31/1120192583/life-expectancy-in-the-u-s-continues-to-drop-driven-by-covid-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 01, 2022, 08:20:40 AM
'Largest score decline' in reading for nation's 9-year-olds, first-ever drop in math (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2022/09/01/naep-reading-math-nations-report-card-scores-drop/7957660001/)


Quote from: Kayla JimenezNew federal data reveals that 9-year-olds' reading and math scores have declined significantly across the board since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The results show the largest average score decline in reading since 1990, and the first-ever score decline in mathematics, the National Center for Education Statistics said.

In other words, no group of high- or low-performing students was spared from a decline in performance by the pandemic and remote schooling.

"The big takeaway is that there are no increases in achievement in either of the subjects for any student group in this assessment. There were only declines or stagnant scores for the nation's 9-year-olds," said Peggy Carr, commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics.

And the pandemic's disruptions to education are the reason.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 01, 2022, 08:44:04 AM
Pfizer and Moderna vaccines against Omikron now approved in the EU.

In DK, the rise in infections seen in the early summer later went down a lot. Copenhagen only has about 70 - 100 registered infections/day.

But for the expected autumnal developments, vaccines for elderly groups, and later those above 50 years of age, incl. a 4th boost, will start in two weeks. The minimizing of boosts in 2022 has sadly and undoubtedly caused too many lives especially at our retirement homes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 01, 2022, 11:39:12 AM
Quote from: MusicTurner on September 01, 2022, 08:44:04 AM
Pfizer and Moderna vaccines against Omikron now approved in the EU.

In DK, the rise in infections seen in the early summer later went down a lot. Copenhagen only has about 70 - 100 registered infections/day.

But for the expected autumnal developments, vaccines for elderly groups, and later those above 50 years of age, incl. a 4th boost, will start in two weeks. The minimizing of boosts in 2022 has sadly and undoubtedly caused too many lives especially at our retirement homes.
It sounds like the fourth round boos was delayed?  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: MusicTurner on September 01, 2022, 12:16:21 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 01, 2022, 11:39:12 AM
It sounds like the fourth round boos was delayed?  :(

PD

Yes, too much.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 03, 2022, 01:45:12 PM
Both Pfizer and Moderna hybrid (Wuhan / BA.4 / BA.5) boosters now approved in the US. Some controversy about the lack of data from clinical trials so far - the EUAs were based on data from mice only.

On a more personal note, I may have been exposed to the virus... a colleague thoughtlessly came to work with what she thought was "a cold". On my advice, she tested herself (antigen test) and it came back positive. I spent about two minutes talking to her from just inside the door of her office - we were both masked, and I was double masked, and she had an air purifier with a HEPA filter running. Still, given the extreme contagiousness of BA.5 (the currently dominant strain here), I'm taking no chances and plan to test myself in 5 days, just before I return to campus after my 4-day weekend (Tuesday is my no-teaching day).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 03, 2022, 01:47:50 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 03, 2022, 01:45:12 PM
Both Pfizer and Moderna hybrid (Wuhan / BA.4 / BA.5) boosters now approved in the US. Some controversy about the lack of data from clinical trials so far - the EUAs were based on data from mice only.

On a more personal note, I may have been exposed to the virus... a colleague thoughtlessly came to work with what she thought was "a cold". On my advice, she tested herself (antigen test) and it came back positive. I spent about two minutes talking to her from just inside the door of her office - we were both masked, and I was double masked, and she had an air purifier with a HEPA filter running. Still, given the extreme contagiousness of BA.5 (the currently dominant strain here), I'm taking no chances and plan to test myself in 5 days, just before I return to campus after my 4-day weekend (Tuesday is my no-teaching day).

Warm vibes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on September 03, 2022, 03:08:17 PM
Quote from: krummholz on September 03, 2022, 01:45:12 PM
Both Pfizer and Moderna hybrid (Wuhan / BA.4 / BA.5) boosters now approved in the US. Some controversy about the lack of data from clinical trials so far - the EUAs were based on data from mice only.

On a more personal note, I may have been exposed to the virus... a colleague thoughtlessly came to work with what she thought was "a cold". On my advice, she tested herself (antigen test) and it came back positive. I spent about two minutes talking to her from just inside the door of her office - we were both masked, and I was double masked, and she had an air purifier with a HEPA filter running. Still, given the extreme contagiousness of BA.5 (the currently dominant strain here), I'm taking no chances and plan to test myself in 5 days, just before I return to campus after my 4-day weekend (Tuesday is my no-teaching day).

Your risk isn't too high in those circumstances, but best wishes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 03, 2022, 04:29:29 PM
Quote from: Madiel on September 03, 2022, 03:08:17 PM
Your risk isn't too high in those circumstances, but best wishes.

Thanks, Madiel. I know the risk isn't high, but I also know people who have taken every precaution and were still hit by the virus. I won't be sure I've dodged the bullet unless I test negative after more than a week. And I still have to use up another LAMP test (limited supply) to be sure I'm not infected on Wednesday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 15, 2022, 10:13:18 AM
From the UN:

The end of the COVID-19 pandemic is in sight: WHO (https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1126621)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2022, 05:32:05 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 04:15:04 AM
For the second time this year, today Other Half is in bed with a case of Covid, this one most likely picked up at the local church Quiz Night on Saturday.  Once again so far I appear unaffected, despite having been on all the same outings and with the same (triple) vaccination status.  Normally I pick up anything that's going around and suffer with it, so I'm inclined to suppose the very nasty bout I caught in the first wave in 2020 may have left me with some enhanced resistance. :-\
Hope that she's doing o.k.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2022, 05:46:06 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 05:43:41 AM
Better today than yesterday (currently fast asleep. :))  Symptoms started on Tuesday evening, after we got back from Costco, so who knows how many more were infected.

One possible vector for the infection was the Quiz Night buffet supper, which no doubt was touched by many hands en route, but being largely wheat-based was not something I could eat, in anticipation of which I took along some supermarket sushi to have instead.
I'd take sushi over hot dish any day!  :D  ;)

So, you're not feeling any ill-effects?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 06, 2022, 06:01:47 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 05:51:53 AM
None at all. ::)  I haven't taken a test because I don't want to use them up when even a positive result wouldn't make any practical difference (we were supposed to be going to Hamburg tomorrow for a concert... :()
Sorry to hear about you missing the concert.  :(

For some reason or another, I was thinking that you lived in the States!  ::)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on October 06, 2022, 07:29:25 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 04:15:04 AM
For the second time this year, today Other Half is in bed with a case of Covid, this one most likely picked up at the local church Quiz Night on Saturday.  Once again so far I appear unaffected, despite having been on all the same outings and with the same (triple) vaccination status.  Normally I pick up anything that's going around and suffer with it, so I'm inclined to suppose the very nasty bout I caught in the first wave in 2020 may have left me with some enhanced resistance. :-\

Best wishes to her for a complete and speedy recovery!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on October 06, 2022, 07:32:35 AM
Quote from: krummholz on October 06, 2022, 07:29:25 AM
Best wishes to her for a complete and speedy recovery!

+ 1.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Mirror Image on October 06, 2022, 07:56:48 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 04:15:04 AM
For the second time this year, today Other Half is in bed with a case of Covid, this one most likely picked up at the local church Quiz Night on Saturday.  Once again so far I appear unaffected, despite having been on all the same outings and with the same (triple) vaccination status.  Normally I pick up anything that's going around and suffer with it, so I'm inclined to suppose the very nasty bout I caught in the first wave in 2020 may have left me with some enhanced resistance. :-\

Sorry to about this --- I hope your wife makes a full recovery and is back on her feet in no time. I had COVID in January of this year and it lasted 3 or 4 days. The only symptoms I had were a cough (not a cronic one) and it felt like someone had stabbed me right in my upper back. And of course, fever and chills.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 06, 2022, 08:19:55 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 04:15:04 AM
For the second time this year, today Other Half is in bed with a case of Covid, this one most likely picked up at the local church Quiz Night on Saturday.  Once again so far I appear unaffected, despite having been on all the same outings and with the same (triple) vaccination status.  Normally I pick up anything that's going around and suffer with it, so I'm inclined to suppose the very nasty bout I caught in the first wave in 2020 may have left me with some enhanced resistance. :-\

Warm vibes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on October 06, 2022, 10:48:29 PM
Indeed, Shostakovich might not be the most... medicinal music.

All the best wishes.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2022, 03:30:06 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 09:00:56 AM
Thanks all for the good wishes, I appreciate it. :)

She is not doing very well but appears to be stable - as far as something with wildly fluctuating symptoms can be stable - and I'm monitoring things like temperature and O2 saturation, which are all around the edge of normal.

Meanwhile the house is unnaturally quiet - I was planning a 5-way Rozhdestvensky/Shostakovich 4th shootout, but suspect that wouldn't be appreciated... ::) ;D
Maybe some Ravel, Debussy or Chopin?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on October 07, 2022, 08:29:03 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 07, 2022, 03:30:06 AM
Maybe some Ravel, Debussy or Chopin?

PD

Chopin, early Scriabin, Satie, Mompou.

And, of course, Hildegard von Bingen.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on October 07, 2022, 02:02:47 PM
Take two nocturnes and call me in the morning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 07, 2022, 02:32:37 PM
(* chortle *)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 09, 2022, 09:27:07 AM
Quote from: Madiel on October 07, 2022, 02:02:47 PM
Take two nocturnes and call me in the morning.
;D  Good one!

Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 09:00:56 AM
Thanks all for the good wishes, I appreciate it. :)

She is not doing very well but appears to be stable - as far as something with wildly fluctuating symptoms can be stable - and I'm monitoring things like temperature and O2 saturation, which are all around the edge of normal.

Meanwhile the house is unnaturally quiet - I was planning a 5-way Rozhdestvensky/Shostakovich 4th shootout, but suspect that wouldn't be appreciated... ::) ;D
How is she feeling today?

And how are you holding out?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on October 10, 2022, 07:23:22 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 09:00:56 AM
Thanks all for the good wishes, I appreciate it. :)

She is not doing very well but appears to be stable - as far as something with wildly fluctuating symptoms can be stable - and I'm monitoring things like temperature and O2 saturation, which are all around the edge of normal.

Meanwhile the house is unnaturally quiet - I was planning a 5-way Rozhdestvensky/Shostakovich 4th shootout, but suspect that wouldn't be appreciated... ::) ;D

Sorry to hear it has hit her hard. I hope to hear of a fast recovery.

I can't help but be curious about how you monitor O2 saturation at home.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 12, 2022, 08:29:59 AM
A Pfizer exec - Janine Small - coined a cool phrase when testifying before the EU Parliament on Monday, when she said that the company had to move at the "speed of science" in getting its vaccine to market. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on October 12, 2022, 02:35:19 PM
That's sounds like a cool phrase, but then I think... how long did it take humans to realize the earth revolves around the sun?  :P  ;D

Maybe something like "the speed of modern technology" would have been better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on October 13, 2022, 05:15:52 AM
Scientists had been researching coronaviruses for decades before this particular coronavirus came along.

Similarly, the mRNA vaccine idea was being worked on for around 10 years.

The main thing that accelerated vaccine development once the pandemic hit was simply an injection of money. Most scientists have a great big list of things they would do if only they had the resources to do it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 13, 2022, 05:32:44 AM
Quote from: Madiel on October 13, 2022, 05:15:52 AM
Scientists had been researching coronaviruses for decades before this particular coronavirus came along.

Similarly, the mRNA vaccine idea was being worked on for around 10 years.

The main thing that accelerated vaccine development once the pandemic hit was simply an injection of money. Most scientists have a great big list of things they would do if only they had the resources to do it.

Thanks for spelling out the obvious.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on October 13, 2022, 06:28:39 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 13, 2022, 05:32:44 AM
Thanks for spelling out the obvious.

I suspect that inquiries by politicians frequently deal with precisely that task.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 13, 2022, 06:41:55 PM
Quote from: Madiel on October 13, 2022, 06:28:39 PM
I suspect that inquiries by politicians frequently deal with precisely that task.

No kidding!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 14, 2022, 02:31:30 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 06, 2022, 09:00:56 AM
Thanks all for the good wishes, I appreciate it. :)

She is not doing very well but appears to be stable - as far as something with wildly fluctuating symptoms can be stable - and I'm monitoring things like temperature and O2 saturation, which are all around the edge of normal.

Meanwhile the house is unnaturally quiet - I was planning a 5-way Rozhdestvensky/Shostakovich 4th shootout, but suspect that wouldn't be appreciated... ::) ;D
And how is madam feeling these days?  Much better, I hope?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 14, 2022, 07:50:46 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 14, 2022, 07:02:45 AM
Better.  Still not well though.

Last weekend I came down with a similar-but-different infection that put me in bed for a couple of days.  Tested negative for Covid so came to the conclusion it was probably a bad case of flu.  And there really is only one person I can have caught that off.  My theory now is that she may have managed to pick up both Covid and flu at the same time, the Covid has now worn off (testing negative) but the flu symptoms linger.  Lot of coughing and sneezing going on around here at the moment.
Glad that there's been some improvement for her but am sorry that she's still not feeling well.  And the flu too?!  Has she had the most recent boosters for the latest Covid and flu variants (also on my to-do list)?

And you, augh!  Very sorry to hear about your own struggles.  Did you per chance get the yearly flu shot?  I've heard that it's started early (at least here in the States) and is nasty.  I need still to get my shot.

Have you had any friends/relatives helping you out lately?  If not, please consider it.

All the best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on October 14, 2022, 07:51:58 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 14, 2022, 07:25:51 AM
Pulse Oximeter:

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61sfWPhEQdL._AC_UL320_.jpg)

As available e.g. from Amazon.  Basically the same device they fit on your finger at the hospital when taking your obs, but as a self-contained unit.  Normal level should be high 90s.

During the first Covid wave there was an issue here with people arriving at hospital already having breathing difficulties, and there not being enough ventilators or even bottled O2 to keep them all going.  So the advice was to get one of these, and if your saturation level drops below 90% then go to hospital immediately, don't wait for it to fall to the point where your breathing is affected.

At one point my wife's O2 did drop into the 80s, but this was after she'd been lying flat on her back for some time, and after getting her to sit upright on the edge of the bed and take some deep breaths her level went back into the mid-90s, so panic over.

Good to know. Thank you for the information.
Some smart watches will also give this readout for you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on October 14, 2022, 09:59:32 AM
Quote from: ultralinear on October 14, 2022, 07:25:51 AM
Pulse Oximeter:

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61sfWPhEQdL._AC_UL320_.jpg)

This is a sweet little device.

~1 year into the pandemic, bought this since I got some sort of other sickness (still don't know what it was), wanted to check to make sure this oxygen issue wouldn't happen.

It never did, but at the time, I was doing a lot of walking, and base heart rate was quite low (it also tracks heart rate), so all it ended up telling me was I was in pretty good health  ;D (athletes often have even lower heart rates than what I had, though some days it was so low, I was like "this is just from walking, right? no bradycardia?" lol).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 18, 2022, 11:20:18 AM
Meanwhile, oh bother:
XBB, BQ.1.1, BA.2.75.2 — a variant swarm could fuel a winter surge
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on October 18, 2022, 06:35:47 PM
Or it could just fuel a swarm of journalists with a need to fill space.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 18, 2022, 07:12:56 PM
Quote from: Madiel on October 18, 2022, 06:35:47 PM
Or it could just fuel a swarm of journalists with a need to fill space.

We can hope. Two friends of mine here have now had the bad luck to "win" the COVID lottery.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 20, 2022, 05:51:56 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 18, 2022, 07:12:56 PM
We can hope. Two friends of mine here have now had the bad luck to "win" the COVID lottery.

Make that four friends now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 25, 2022, 10:31:05 AM
A new immunity-evading virus variant looms. Here's how to fight it. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/25/covid-variant-bq11-vaccine-booster/)

What is not yet known is whether or how well an immunity wall, built both by natural infection and vaccines, might protect against a new wave. One reason to worry is that BQ.1.1 evades immune systems on a greater scale than other variants and subvariants. Already, the new variant has the potential to make obsolete Evusheld, a key antibody used to protect immunocompromised individuals. Cases appear to be taking off in New York and could spread across the country in the months ahead. Another subvariant, known as XBB, can also easily evade immune systems.. So far, it has spread far in Singapore but little in the United States.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 25, 2022, 01:17:08 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 25, 2022, 10:31:05 AM
A new immunity-evading virus variant looms. Here's how to fight it. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/25/covid-variant-bq11-vaccine-booster/)

What is not yet known is whether or how well an immunity wall, built both by natural infection and vaccines, might protect against a new wave. One reason to worry is that BQ.1.1 evades immune systems on a greater scale than other variants and subvariants. Already, the new variant has the potential to make obsolete Evusheld, a key antibody used to protect immunocompromised individuals. Cases appear to be taking off in New York and could spread across the country in the months ahead. Another subvariant, known as XBB, can also easily evade immune systems.. So far, it has spread far in Singapore but little in the United States.
Karl, I suspect that a lot of us can't read the WP articles.  Thank you for the info though.  I'll try and look it up elsewhere.

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on October 25, 2022, 07:32:33 PM

     I got the new Moderna booster today (Tuesday). To be perfectly Franck I'm starting to think of Covid as a bad flu which will be more dangerous as I get older and more decrepit. My health is excellent in the relevant respects. Kidney stones don't signify.

     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 26, 2022, 06:10:34 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on October 25, 2022, 01:17:08 PM
Karl, I suspect that a lot of us can't read the WP articles.  Thank you for the info though.  I'll try and look it up elsewhere.

Best,

PD

Sorry! They used not to hold COVID articles behind the paywall. I guess that policy was since dropped ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 26, 2022, 01:19:04 PM
NYC Ordered to Reinstate Workers Fired for Covid Vaccine Refusal (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-25/nyc-is-ordered-to-reinstate-workers-fired-for-vaccine-refusal)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on October 26, 2022, 01:49:54 PM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 26, 2022, 06:10:34 AM
Sorry! They used not to hold COVID articles behind the paywall. I guess that policy was since dropped ....
That's o.k., but thanks.]]PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Herman on October 27, 2022, 08:46:42 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 20, 2022, 05:51:56 AM
Make that four friends now.

Sharing is what friends are for.

How serious are their symptoms?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 27, 2022, 09:52:36 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 27, 2022, 08:46:42 AM
Sharing is what friends are for.

How serious are their symptoms?

Overall, mild, thanks for checking. All of them are vaxxed, so they are avoiding the worst of it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on October 31, 2022, 02:24:44 PM
From The Atlantic:

Let's Declare a Pandemic Amnesty

We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID. (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/)

Maybe it happens. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on October 31, 2022, 02:54:20 PM
Emily Oster: Obviously some people intended to mislead and made wildly irresponsible claims. Remember when the public-health community had to spend a lot of time and resources urging Americans not to inject themselves with bleach? That was bad. Misinformation was, and remains, a huge problem. But most errors were made by people who were working in earnest for the good of society.

We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty. We can leave out the willful purveyors of actual misinformation while forgiving the hard calls that people had no choice but to make with imperfect knowledge.


"We can leave out the willful purveyors of actual misinformation" is a good caveat. Possible overlap with "people who give a ready ear to conspiracy theory rubbish"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on November 19, 2022, 12:14:47 PM
So, very young children are now being vaccinated for COVID? This is recommended? I'm out of the loop on that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on November 19, 2022, 12:19:53 PM
Quote from: milk on November 19, 2022, 12:14:47 PM
So, very young children are now being vaccinated for COVID? This is recommended? I'm out of the loop on that.

Took my daughters to the doctor last week and they received flu, Covid, and HPV vaccines, among some other boosters for school in the US.

VS
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on November 19, 2022, 09:27:45 PM
Quote from: milk on November 19, 2022, 12:14:47 PM
So, very young children are now being vaccinated for COVID? This is recommended? I'm out of the loop on that.

Yes, they did clinical trials and got the okay.

Here in Australia, under 5 is only recommended for children at risk, for example immunocompromised.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 16, 2022, 01:49:32 PM
People who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study (https://fortune.com/well/2022/12/13/covid-unvaccinated-greater-risk-car-crash-traffic-accident-new-study-says-canada-government-records-pfizer-moderna/)

Science.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on December 16, 2022, 01:56:47 PM
Quote from: Todd on December 16, 2022, 01:49:32 PMPeople who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study (https://fortune.com/well/2022/12/13/covid-unvaccinated-greater-risk-car-crash-traffic-accident-new-study-says-canada-government-records-pfizer-moderna/)

Science.

Called spurious relationship.
When the ice cream are sold a lot, beers are sold a lot too. There is a mathematical relationship, without a causal effect, since the both are influenced by temperature.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on December 16, 2022, 04:19:20 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on December 16, 2022, 01:56:47 PMCalled spurious relationship.
When the ice cream are sold a lot, beers are sold a lot too. There is a mathematical relationship, without a causal effect, since the both are influenced by temperature.

How is that "spurious", though? I agree that neither is the direct cause of the other (just as the article discusses that vaccination status doesn't cause traffic accidents) but I don't know that "spurious" is the right word for a correlation (just as the article discusses how the same behavioural factors might affect both vaccination and driving behaviour).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on December 19, 2022, 08:42:39 PM
I didn't read the article, but seems pretty obvious that the most likely cause is that the people that didn't get it have more reckless and daring personality tendencies, so that translates into driving style, which ends up in more accidents.

Of course, people are going to come to judgement about that- especially here, most people will probably think "what reckless idiots! serves them right!" but you just gotta keep in mind the big picture- that recklessness is a true double edged sword- it is possible growth in the right conditions, possible disaster in the wrong ones. You will never grow if you play it safe all the time, more likely you will be subject to the whims of those who recklessly risked it all to rise above- but if their recklessness results in dumb traffic accidents, then their bad quality is that they are dumb, not that they are reckless, and that's the main reason for their failure (apart from bad luck as another possibility).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 27, 2022, 10:25:14 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 16, 2022, 01:49:32 PMPeople who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study (https://fortune.com/well/2022/12/13/covid-unvaccinated-greater-risk-car-crash-traffic-accident-new-study-says-canada-government-records-pfizer-moderna/)

Science.

Some people are more careless than others... Not exactly rocket science... 8)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on December 27, 2022, 04:27:30 PM
    The news from China is grim. According to a source within China as many as 37 million people were infected in a single day. The problem has three aspects. The Chinese vaccine is ineffective against the most common variants in the country, natural immunity to Covid is not common, and given these factors the only solution is to vaccinate everyone with effective vaccines like the ones that have allowed normalcy to return in the rest of the world.

    The Chinese have refused offers of an effective vaccine. Millions will die.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on December 28, 2022, 01:38:13 PM
US to require travelers from China to show negative Covid-19 test result before flight (https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/28/politics/us-covid-measures-travelers-china/index.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on December 28, 2022, 01:56:22 PM
A range of countries have introduced the testing requirement for arrivals from China. Another story said Italy has imposed the requirement because half of passengers were testing positive. Half!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on December 29, 2022, 07:43:44 AM
Quote from: Todd on December 28, 2022, 01:38:13 PMUS to require travelers from China to show negative Covid-19 test result before flight (https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/28/politics/us-covid-measures-travelers-china/index.html)

As only few countries impose limited regulations, they won't be effective much. All the developed nations must implement similar/tighter regulations on travelers from China.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 30, 2022, 11:38:44 AM
Quote from: Madiel on December 28, 2022, 01:56:22 PMA range of countries have introduced the testing requirement for arrivals from China. Another story said Italy has imposed the requirement because half of passengers were testing positive. Half!

Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on December 29, 2022, 07:43:44 AMAs only few countries impose limited regulations, they won't be effective much. All the developed nations must implement similar/tighter regulations on travelers from China.

Wouldn't it probably be too late now for tighter restrictions?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on December 30, 2022, 01:16:11 PM
Quote from: Que on December 30, 2022, 11:38:44 AMWouldn't it probably be too late now for tighter restrictions?

Well, that's a good question. I suppose the issue is what happens if you get a lot of unvaccinated or poorly vaccinated people coming into a population. I'm really not sure. We know that vaccinated people tend to have better outcomes, but I'm less clear on how much impact increased population exposure to the virus would have. Vaccination is really designed to work at a population level not individually (I wish more people understood this) so presumably there would be some impact.

Apparently some of the concern has to do with the risk of new strains developing in China as cases go up. So there's that. A new strain could blunt the impact of our current vaccines.

It's hard to know how much is politics rather than science. Australia is not yet making any change and our PM says we'll be guided by health/science advice. But we also have political reasons at the moment to avoid upsetting China.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on December 31, 2022, 01:03:06 AM
Quote from: drogulus on December 27, 2022, 04:27:30 PMThe news from China is grim. According to a source within China as many as 37 million people were infected in a single day. The problem has three aspects. The Chinese vaccine is ineffective against the most common variants in the country, natural immunity to Covid is not common, and given these factors the only solution is to vaccinate everyone with effective vaccines like the ones that have allowed normalcy to return in the rest of the world.

The Chinese have refused offers of an effective vaccine. Millions will die.

Quote from: Madiel on December 30, 2022, 01:16:11 PMApparently some of the concern has to do with the risk of new strains developing in China as cases go up. So there's that. A new strain could blunt the impact of our current vaccines.

Disturbing developments. I definitely do not hope we are going to revisit the earlier days of the pandemic... Again, and during a global economic recession and a war. Argghhh... :P
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on December 31, 2022, 07:51:48 PM
Australia will require a negative result when travelling from China, starting January 5.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 02, 2023, 04:41:16 PM
It has emerged our chief medical officer advised against imposing the testing requirement for arrivals from China.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-03/chief-medical-officer-opposed-mandatory-covid-test-china-travel/101822918
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 03, 2023, 02:11:24 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 02, 2023, 04:41:16 PMIt has emerged our chief medical officer advised against imposing the testing requirement for arrivals from China.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-03/chief-medical-officer-opposed-mandatory-covid-test-china-travel/101822918

You gotta love the very first paragraph:

Australia's chief medical officer explicitly advised the Albanese government not to introduce mandatory COVID-19 testing on travellers from China a day before the measure was announced.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 03, 2023, 02:52:28 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 03, 2023, 02:11:24 AMYou gotta love the very first paragraph:

Australia's chief medical officer explicitly advised the Albanese government not to introduce mandatory COVID-19 testing on travellers from China a day before the measure was announced.



In the article waste water testing is mentioned. This method of monitoring the proliferation of the virus amongst the general population was first introduced in the Netherlands. Recent data shows a significant increase - a new wave is in progress.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 03, 2023, 08:00:45 AM
Quote from: Florestan on January 03, 2023, 02:11:24 AMYou gotta love the very first paragraph:

Australia's chief medical officer explicitly advised the Albanese government not to introduce mandatory COVID-19 testing on travellers from China a day before the measure was announced.


The Prime Minister's name is Albanese.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 03, 2023, 08:03:20 AM
Quote from: Madiel on January 03, 2023, 08:00:45 AMThe Prime Minister's name is Albanese.

Ooops, didn't know that. My bad then.  :D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 05, 2023, 04:37:11 AM
QuoteGermany's health minister has expressed concern over a new COVID-19 subvariant linked to growing hospitalizations in the northeastern United States, adding that Berlin was watching the situation closely.

As much of the world looks to rising COVID-19 cases in China, infectious disease experts have also been increasingly worried about the highly contagious omicron XBB.1.5, which made up more than 40 percent of US cases, official data showed last week.

"Hopefully we get through the winter before such a variant can spread among us," the minister, Karl Lauterbach, wrote on Twitter late on Wednesday.

"We are monitoring whether, and to what extent, XBB.1.5 occurs in Germany."

Seven of the 10 US states to see rising infections and hospitalizations are in the Northeast, in line with higher XBB cases, Dr. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota, told Reuters in a recent interview.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on January 06, 2023, 12:29:37 AM

China Covid: wave of celebrity deaths sparks doubt over actual toll (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/06/china-covid-wave-of-celebrity-deaths-sparks-concern-over-actual-death-toll)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 11, 2023, 02:55:23 PM
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/517/235/23e.jpg)

Why COVID's XBB.1.5 'Kraken' Variant Is So Contagious (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-covids-xbb-1-5-kraken-variant-is-so-contagious/)

So "scientists" have become cheeky in naming variants and the press runs with it.  I'll take that as a good sign. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 22, 2023, 04:17:53 PM
Covid, flu, RSV declining in hospitals as 'tripledemic' threat fades
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 23, 2023, 09:54:35 AM
I seem to have the mother of all colds. No temp, low energy, lots of congestion. Posting here to say that, with all the junk going around, I decided to go get tested in Urgent Care, to rule out anything nasty and to confirm that I can just take care of myself at home and ride it out. Tested negative for the real baddies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 23, 2023, 10:06:40 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 23, 2023, 09:54:35 AMI seem to have the mother of all colds. No temp, low energy, lots of congestion. Posting here to say that, with all the junk going around, I decided to go get tested in Urgent Care, to rule out anything nasty and to confirm that I can just take care of myself at home and ride it out. Tested negative for the real baddies.

I hope to hear soon that you're feeling better.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 23, 2023, 10:16:32 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 23, 2023, 10:06:40 AMI hope to hear soon that you're feeling better.
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 24, 2023, 06:04:45 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on January 23, 2023, 09:54:35 AMI seem to have the mother of all colds. No temp, low energy, lots of congestion. Posting here to say that, with all the junk going around, I decided to go get tested in Urgent Care, to rule out anything nasty and to confirm that I can just take care of myself at home and ride it out. Tested negative for the real baddies.
Sorry to hear that Karl.  Hope that you feel better soon!

PD

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2023, 06:10:51 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 24, 2023, 06:04:45 AMSorry to hear that Karl.  Hope that you feel better soon!

PD


Thanks! Mending slowly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on January 24, 2023, 07:02:00 AM
I wish yo a speedy recovery, Karl!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 24, 2023, 11:21:49 AM
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 19, 2023, 01:51:58 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 23, 2023, 10:06:40 AMI hope to hear soon that you're feeling better.
I neglected to report when I returned to normal.

Posting today just to say that I've learnt yesterday and today that two of the members of my church choir who were at rehearsal Thursday have since tested positive. I am feeling fine. Just another reminder that, even being careful, this virus isn't quite behind us. We all wish it were.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 19, 2023, 02:13:32 PM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 19, 2023, 01:51:58 PMI neglected to report when I returned to normal.

Posting today just to say that I've learnt yesterday and today that two of the members of my church choir who were at rehearsal Thursday have since tested positive. I am feeling fine. Just another reminder that, even being careful, this virus isn't quite behind us. We all wish it were.

You might be shocked to know that despite working in a boarding school... I've never had covid.  When it all started three years ago I thought it was inevitable.  I seem to be VERY LUCKY.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 19, 2023, 02:14:25 PM
Quote from: DavidW on February 19, 2023, 02:13:32 PMYou might be shocked to know that despite working in a boarding school... I've never had covid.  When it all started three years ago I thought it was inevitable.  I seem to be VERY LUCKY.
Excellent!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2023, 10:32:03 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 19, 2023, 01:51:58 PMI neglected to report when I returned to normal.

Posting today just to say that I've learnt yesterday and today that two of the members of my church choir who were at rehearsal Thursday have since tested positive. I am feeling fine. Just another reminder that, even being careful, this virus isn't quite behind us. We all wish it were.
Well, and I've just tested positive. I don't feel awful, so here's hoping I shake it off soon-ish. The choir won't be participating in the Ash Wednesday service. In fact, as a precaution, I see that the pastor is nixing the service this year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: aligreto on February 20, 2023, 10:48:54 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 20, 2023, 10:32:03 AMWell, and I've just tested positive. I don't feel awful, so here's hoping I shake it off soon-ish. The choir won't be participating in the Ash Wednesday service. In fact, as a precaution, I see that the pastor is nixing the service this year.

Get well soon Karl  :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2023, 10:50:03 AM
Quote from: aligreto on February 20, 2023, 10:48:54 AMGet well soon Karl  :)
Many thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on February 20, 2023, 11:12:08 AM
Quote from: aligreto on February 20, 2023, 10:48:54 AMGet well soon Karl  :)
+1

Take good care of yourself, Karl!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2023, 11:15:57 AM
Quote from: ritter on February 20, 2023, 11:12:08 AM+1

Take good care of yourself, Karl!
Thank you!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 20, 2023, 11:16:29 AM
Quote from: aligreto on February 20, 2023, 10:48:54 AMGet well soon Karl  :)

+ 2
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 20, 2023, 12:24:33 PM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 20, 2023, 10:32:03 AMWell, and I've just tested positive. I don't feel awful, so here's hoping I shake it off soon-ish. The choir won't be participating in the Ash Wednesday service. In fact, as a precaution, I see that the pastor is nixing the service this year.

Feel better soon, Karl!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2023, 01:01:30 PM
Quote from: krummholz on February 20, 2023, 12:24:33 PMFeel better soon, Karl!
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 21, 2023, 10:04:10 AM
I'm still "in the window" for Paxlovid, and since I cannot go out to pick it up, a friend will drop it off to me this afternoon.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 21, 2023, 02:46:59 PM
They're launching the next round of booster vaccinations here in Australia. For people like me it's number 5.

I foresee a future of annual flu shots and twice-yearly covid shots. Though maybe eventually they'll both be annual.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: brewski on February 21, 2023, 03:16:53 PM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 20, 2023, 10:32:03 AMWell, and I've just tested positive. I don't feel awful, so here's hoping I shake it off soon-ish. The choir won't be participating in the Ash Wednesday service. In fact, as a precaution, I see that the pastor is nixing the service this year.

Well, dang. Glad it's not "awful," but still... Sending you good vibes that the virus decides it doesn't like composers ;D or Boston ;D ;D and leaves soon.

-Bruce
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 22, 2023, 07:44:56 AM
Quote from: brewski on February 21, 2023, 03:16:53 PMWell, dang. Glad it's not "awful," but still... Sending you good vibes that the virus decides it doesn't like composers ;D or Boston ;D ;D and leaves soon.

-Bruce
Feeling wiped out, and (a symptom I had only heard of before) brain-fogged. Just getting lots of rest. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: brewski on February 22, 2023, 07:58:07 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 22, 2023, 07:44:56 AMFeeling wiped out, and (a symptom I had only heard of before) brain-fogged. Just getting lots of rest.

Yikes for the brain fog, but yay for the rest. Maybe time to binge on those laughable, second-rate movies you've been saving for the right occasion. In any case, hang in there.

-Bruce
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 22, 2023, 12:42:17 PM
Quote from: brewski on February 22, 2023, 07:58:07 AMYikes for the brain fog, but yay for the rest. Maybe time to binge on those laughable, second-rate movies you've been saving for the right occasion. In any case, hang in there.

-Bruce
Thanks. It's a fine state of affairs that last night I didn't have the energy to watch TV....

Separately:

I had employer support with my long COVID. Others aren't so lucky. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/02/22/opinion/i-had-employer-support-with-my-long-covid-others-arent-so-lucky/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 22, 2023, 04:04:33 PM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 22, 2023, 12:42:17 PMThanks. It's a fine state of affairs that last night I didn't have the energy to watch TV....

Separately:

I had employer support with my long COVID. Others aren't so lucky. (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/02/22/opinion/i-had-employer-support-with-my-long-covid-others-arent-so-lucky/)

The insanity of US healthcare and of US employment conditions generally is a topic worthy of a whole thread in itself.

Not that things are perfect here. But this kind of thing is a major reason I would never move to the USA.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on February 23, 2023, 03:37:40 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 22, 2023, 07:44:56 AMFeeling wiped out, and (a symptom I had only heard of before) brain-fogged. Just getting lots of rest.
Are those your only symptoms? I thought I had a prolonged cold, or two colds back to back but I'm beginning to wonder. It's nothing serious but I decided to stay home the last week or so. I have no fever. I've had all the vaccinations too. I wonder if I should get tested. I've also heard there are government approved home tests here in Japan. Huh.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 23, 2023, 04:49:30 AM
Quote from: milk on February 23, 2023, 03:37:40 AMAre those your only symptoms? I thought I had a prolonged cold, or two colds back to back but I'm beginning to wonder. It's nothing serious but I decided to stay home the last week or so. I have no fever. I've had all the vaccinations too. I wonder if I should get tested. I've also heard there are government approved home tests here in Japan. Huh.

Probably best to get tested if tests are available. And yes, staying home was a wise decision. For someone who is up to date on vaccinations, the virus might cause only very mild symptoms. There is no way to know without being tested - preferable with one of the nucleic acid amplification tests (PCR or LAMP).

Karl, wishing you a swift and COMPLETE recovery with no prolonged symptoms.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 23, 2023, 08:47:08 AM
Quote from: milk on February 23, 2023, 03:37:40 AMAre those your only symptoms? I thought I had a prolonged cold, or two colds back to back but I'm beginning to wonder. It's nothing serious but I decided to stay home the last week or so. I have no fever. I've had all the vaccinations too. I wonder if I should get tested. I've also heard there are government approved home tests here in Japan. Huh.
Sore throat, congestion, and at odd times for a couple of days a very mild fever (just enough to prompt donning an extra shirt.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on February 23, 2023, 09:23:59 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 23, 2023, 10:06:40 AMI hope to hear soon that you're feeling better.
Me too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 23, 2023, 09:30:59 AM
Thanks! Slow improvement. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on February 23, 2023, 10:57:13 AM
A few times since the pandemic began I've had what seemed like my typical cold. It starts with nasal congestion and irritation, then post-nasal drip and an annoying cough. Only once I tested myself with a home kit because someone else in the house seemed to have had it hard, but it turned out negative. So as far as I know I've not had Covid, although I've gone through 3 or 4 colds untested.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: milk on February 23, 2023, 07:19:34 PM
I tested myself at home today after 3 weeks of feeling like I've had a cold with no fever or heavy Sx. Test was negative. Once I got better and then worse. I might have had two colds back to back from the kids or maybe COVID. I'm feeling much better today. Anyway, feel better those of you who are sick. Rest up and take care.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 23, 2023, 11:13:34 PM
Canberra is the last place in Australia where you're required to report a positive rapid test result. They're going to wind that back. It'll be recommended to report it, but not a legal requirement.

It's also going to become much harder to get a PCR test (again, we might be the last place where the government is running/funding them but I'm not certain). More signs of moving on to where it's another of the diseases going around and not particularly special.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 25, 2023, 08:38:48 AM
Quote from: milk on February 23, 2023, 07:19:34 PMI tested myself at home today after 3 weeks of feeling like I've had a cold with no fever or heavy Sx. Test was negative. Once I got better and then worse. I might have had two colds back to back from the kids or maybe COVID. I'm feeling much better today. Anyway, feel better those of you who are sick. Rest up and take care.
Keep up that trend of feeling better. I'm at the "I seem to be restoring the energy, but I'm impatient with the progress" stage. After spending a normal morning, I need a nap. Still, it's improvement and therefore welcome. Today closes out the Paxlovid course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 25, 2023, 08:59:41 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 25, 2023, 08:38:48 AMKeep up that trend of feeling better. I'm at the "I seem to be restoring the energy, but I'm impatient with the progress" stage. After spending a normal morning, I need a nap. Still, it's improvement and therefore welcome. Today closes out the Paxlovid course.

Glad you're on Paxlovid, Karl. Whatever you do, don't try to push it - I have read a recent article on Long Covid that said trying to get back to full activity leveltoo soon might be one of the triggers for the downward cascade that ends in persistent debilitation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 25, 2023, 09:12:19 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 25, 2023, 08:59:41 AMGlad you're on Paxlovid, Karl. Whatever you do, don't try to push it - I have read a recent article on Long Covid that said trying to get back to full activity leveltoo soon might be one of the triggers for the downward cascade that ends in persistent debilitation.
Thanks for the alert!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 25, 2023, 09:20:06 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 25, 2023, 08:38:48 AMI'm at the "I seem to be restoring the energy, but I'm impatient with the progress" stage.

Don't push it, Karl. You are a strong person, both physically and mentally, you'll eventually restore fully --- just don't push it. One step at the time.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 25, 2023, 09:39:49 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 25, 2023, 09:20:06 AMDon't push it, Karl. You are a strong person, both physically and mentally, you'll eventually restore fully --- just don't push it. One step at the time.


Warmly appreciated, Andrei!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 25, 2023, 10:01:37 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 25, 2023, 09:39:49 AMWarmly appreciated, Andrei!

I'm sure you're not allowed to drink for the time being, nevertheless, here's to your health, Karl!

(https://www.gifcen.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/cheers-gif-9.gif)

(sipping my own homegrown red wine)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 26, 2023, 01:31:11 PM
From the Graun: Covid-19 likely emerged from laboratory leak, US energy department says: Updated finding a departure from previous studies on how the virus emerged and comes with 'low confidence' (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/26/covid-virus-likely-laboratory-leak-us-energy-department)

Low confidence is a marked step up from proclamations of a conspiracy theory.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 26, 2023, 01:56:37 PM
It's not a question for intelligence agencies, but for scientists. It's pretty well established not just that the first cases were centred around the market, but around a specific section of the market.

For it to come out of a laboratory without the earliest cases having a link to a laboratory - or without explaining at all how the careful analysis of the cases centred around a specific section of the market is wrong or incomplete - is little more than people with a hammer claiming they think they saw a nail. If you're an intelligence agency you're used to studying how people plan things, not on studying how diseases jump species on a regular basis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on February 28, 2023, 04:36:53 AM
The bottom line is that there is no definitive evidence either way and the various U.S. intelligence agencies have been split as to which is more likely from the beginning. The one reliable purely scientific report that I've seen says that statistical analysis of the sequence is more consistent with a natural origin of the virus, rather than engineering. If there is a conspiracy theory here it is just that the origin of the virus is known being covered up.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 28, 2023, 04:41:35 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on February 28, 2023, 04:36:53 AMThe one reliable purely scientific report that I've seen says that statistical analysis of the sequence is more consistent with a natural origin of the virus, rather than engineering.

Which purely scientific report was that?  And how is the word "purely" defined?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on February 28, 2023, 07:52:47 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 28, 2023, 04:41:35 AMWhich purely scientific report was that?  And how is the word "purely" defined?

It took me 10 seconds to find this report in the journal Nature.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

Salient quote: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus."

It is not the one I was thinking of, which came from researcher in the UK (The University of Cambridge, if I recall correctly). This one is primarily from U.S. researchers (the Scripps Institute).

You can debate whether it is purely nonpolitical, but they base their analysis on characteristics of the genome of the original Wuhan virus.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 28, 2023, 09:11:42 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on February 28, 2023, 07:52:47 AMIt is not the one I was thinking of, which came from researcher in the UK (The University of Cambridge, if I recall correctly). This one is primarily from U.S. researchers (the Scripps Institute).

I can google things easily enough.  I was interested in the specific article you referenced, though now even you can't recall the original article with a high degree of confidence.  I asked about the word "purely" because that is an unusual word to use when describing scientific research.

The fact is that you do not know whether the Covid virus is zoonotic or man-made.  You apparently choose to believe the articles you googled.  That is fine.  I do not know whether Covid is zoonotic or man-made.  Additional research is needed.  This is reinforced by the findings published by the Energy Department, as well as earlier findings published by the FBI.  Given that around seven million people have died from the disease, trillions of dollars of public money around the world was misallocated to Covid responses (~$25 trillion was spent globally), at least hundreds of billions of dollars of that money was stolen (at least $560 billion of it in the US alone), and authoritarian policies were implemented everywhere, we, as in humanity, need to come as close as possible to determining with absolute certainty what the source of the virus was, and we need to reexamine public health and coercive state responses to the disease.  There is much to do still with respect to Covid.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 28, 2023, 09:17:25 AM
Quote from: Florestan on February 25, 2023, 09:20:06 AMDon't push it, Karl. You are a strong person, both physically and mentally, you'll eventually restore fully --- just don't push it. One step at the time.


Inching better. Just wanted to report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 28, 2023, 09:49:33 AM
Opinion: We are asking the wrong question about the origins of covid (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/27/covid-pandemic-lab-leak-energy-department/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on February 28, 2023, 10:14:26 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 28, 2023, 09:17:25 AMInching better. Just wanted to report.

Great news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 11:26:27 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 28, 2023, 09:49:33 AMOpinion: We are asking the wrong question about the origins of covid (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/27/covid-pandemic-lab-leak-energy-department/)

Frankly even that article gives a bit too much credence to the laboratory hypothesis and doesn't critique it enough, even though it contains the basic elements of the critique.

Firstly, it gives examples of laboratory accidents, in which it was laboratory workers who got sick or died. So we know how to link a disease to a laboratory. Through laboratory workers. Not market stall holders.

Second, it mentions that an estimated three quarters of diseases are zoonotic.

The desire to blame the Chinese for this disease as much as possible is political. You can in fact still make an argument about whether conditions in China make the emergence of zoonotic diseases more likely. But from the beginning I've had this recurring sense that many people simply aren't familiar with the fact that most diseases are zoonotic and just instinctively prefer an explanation that the Chinese "did" something, and have only settled for choosing between a deliberate act and an accidental one.

I was hearing scientists say that the disease was natural rather than engineered as early as March or April 2020. They could readily tell that much about it.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 28, 2023, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 11:26:27 AMFrankly even that article gives a bit too much credence to the laboratory hypothesis and doesn't critique it enough, even though it contains the basic elements of the critique.
That's entirely fair.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 02:22:18 PM
Also, regards the lack of Chinese cooperation... it isn't paranoia if people really show signs of being out to get you.

I can't imagine the USA would be prepared to throw open laboratories for inspection just because someone started saying "it came from a laboratory because they have laboratories". Which is pretty much what happened. Wuhan is a large city. Large cities having laboratories is not a shocking revelation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on February 28, 2023, 04:38:18 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 02:22:18 PMI can't imagine the USA would be prepared to throw open laboratories for inspection just because someone started saying "it came from a laboratory because they have laboratories". Which is pretty much what happened. Wuhan is a large city. Large cities having laboratories is not a shocking revelation.
Um, it was a little more specific than that.
More comparable to something like a reported robbery at a store by a guy wearing red gloves and a hoodie, and then very close to that location there is a guy walking around in red gloves and a hoodie.

It totally could still be the wrong guy, could all be a coincidence (after all, many guys in the world are wearing red gloves and a hoodie right now), but it's why it was worth looking into. Timing, location, the very specific thing they were studying, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 28, 2023, 05:03:55 PM
FBI Director Christopher Wray publicly stated today that the FBI's stance is that the virus leaked from a lab in China.  The interview was given to Fox News.  It is accessible (at least partly) here: FBI director says COVID pandemic 'most likely' originated from Chinese lab (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-director-says-covid-pandemic-most-likely-originated-chinese-lab).

This raises several issues.  Is the FBI acting in good faith?  Is the FBI flat out lying?  (Same goes for the Department of Energy.)  How will this be viewed through the grotesquely distorted lens of politics?  For instance, more American liberals trust the FBI than conservatives now.  Will we see a reversion to the historical norm, which was the inverse?  Will non-American hangers-on follow the lead of American liberals?  Is this all too conveniently timed to ratchet up pressure on China?  A yes to this question, or an inclination to believe this is the case, would be cynical, and as has been reiterated on this forum, cynicism bad. 

As mentioned before, this is a very serious topic that demands a very serious approach and a consensus should be reached across the globe.  That may not be in the cards.  Without knowing the cause, it will not be possible to formulate proper policy responses, for the proper policies vary quite widely based on whether this was a zoonotic or man-made virus.  That translates into more wasted spending and a certainty of authoritarian actions being used in potential future public health emergencies. 

I doubt such an event will occur again in my statistically probable lifetime, so I am not motivated to track down potentially profitable investment opportunities beyond health care sector ETFs and funds, which reliably beat broad market indices. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 05:48:36 PM
Quote from: greg on February 28, 2023, 04:38:18 PMUm, it was a little more specific than that.
More comparable to something like a reported robbery at a store by a guy wearing red gloves and a hoodie, and then very close to that location there is a guy walking around in red gloves and a hoodie.

It totally could still be the wrong guy, could all be a coincidence (after all, many guys in the world are wearing red gloves and a hoodie right now), but it's why it was worth looking into. Timing, location, the very specific thing they were studying, etc.

Not the very specific thing they were studying. Unless you think "viruses" is specific.

If we are going to continue with this analogy, there was no proof that a robbery was involved. It reminds me of a relative of my mother who insisted she was robbed when my mother was pretty darn sure the relative just left something behind when leaving a train.

This again gets back to the problem with relying on intelligence agencies for this stuff. They are trained to find your "robber", so they are inevitably going to look for one rather than taking a step back and asking whether anyone at all was robbed.

After all, three quarters of losses are not robberies.

It's a clumsy analogy you've made, but three quarters of new diseases are zoonotic. The reasons for leaping to a human explanation simply weren't based on science. The disease appeared in a market with animals.

There is no reason to go looking for the laboratory at fault when the scientists say the virus shows no sign of being FROM a laboratory, ANY laboratory, in the first place. Starting with the existence of a laboratory in Wuhan is exactly backwards. You need to start with a laboratory-engineered virus, and then of course working out which laboratory engineered it would be fairly straightforward in the circumstances.

So sure, if a robbery was committed the robber is probably nearby. The problem is, people saw a guy in a hoodie nearby and leapt to the conclusion that there was a robbery, when the shopkeeper is regularly absent-minded and keeps forgetting he asked an employee to take stuff somewhere, and also has a hole in his pocket and drops money out whenever he's walking somewhere.  The shop shows no sign of a struggle. And sure, there's a camera image of that guy in the hoodie that we know was in the area, but there isn't the slightest hint on the footage that he took anything or even entered the store.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 01, 2023, 10:45:33 AM
Quote from: Todd on February 28, 2023, 09:11:42 AMI can google things easily enough.  I was interested in the specific article you referenced, though now even you can't recall the original article with a high degree of confidence.  I asked about the word "purely" because that is an unusual word to use when describing scientific research.

The fact is that you do not know whether the Covid virus is zoonotic or man-made.  You apparently choose to believe the articles you googled.  That is fine.  I do not know whether Covid is zoonotic or man-made.  Additional research is needed.  This is reinforced by the findings published by the Energy Department, as well as earlier findings published by the FBI.  Given that around seven million people have died from the disease, trillions of dollars of public money around the world was misallocated to Covid responses (~$25 trillion was spent globally), at least hundreds of billions of dollars of that money was stolen (at least $560 billion of it in the US alone), and authoritarian policies were implemented everywhere, we, as in humanity, need to come as close as possible to determining with absolute certainty what the source of the virus was, and we need to reexamine public health and coercive state responses to the disease.  There is much to do still with respect to Covid.

More of the usual gaslighting. Yes, I am aware that all scientific knowledge is conditional on confirmation by further research. However, a consensus seems to be coalescing around the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus arose naturally. That is a non-political determination based on statistical analysis of the genome of the first identified variant of the virus. I assess the reliability of the various reports based on the review processes for the various scientific journals, meaning that nothing gets published unless the researchers fiercest competitors fail to shoot it down.

That is a separate question from whether the virus entered the general population at a market, or if a worker in a research lab became infected and carried the virus out. In the past there have been many instances of the former and a few instances of the latter. I don't get the impression that anyone talking has strong evidence either way. The "smoking gun" would be to match the sequence of the initial strain of SARS-CoV-2 to something that was known to be in the lab. That's what happened when there was an Anthrax attack in the U.S. and the strain used in the attack was an exact match to a strain being studied by the U.S. Army at Ft Derick, Maryland. A staff member there committed suicide before he could be indicted for the attack.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 01, 2023, 10:53:30 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 01, 2023, 10:45:33 AMMore of the usual gaslighting.

Huh?


Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 01, 2023, 10:45:33 AMI don't get the impression that anyone talking has strong evidence either way.

Correct, there are no "smoking guns".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 09:21:08 AM
Quote from: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 05:48:36 PMThere is no reason to go looking for the laboratory at fault when the scientists say the virus shows no sign of being FROM a laboratory, ANY laboratory, in the first place.

"The scientists" presumes there is a widely-held scientific consensus on this. There is certainly a consensus among certain scientists associated with public-health agencies, but how widely-held it is appears to be debatable. And it is clear that some other scientists have different views. Just today I read a post on the AAAS Science forums from a retired biologist who gave a very detailed and technical argument for why, in his opinion, it is extremely unlikely that the virus jumped to humans in a zoonotic event, and FAR more likely that it was engineered by humans.

(I am not a biologist and cannot vouch for the correctness of his argument. I'm only saying that there are scientists with what, to them, are very sound scientific reasons for the lab-leak hypothesis.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 09:23:13 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on February 28, 2023, 09:17:25 AMInching better. Just wanted to report.

Glad to hear this Karl - may the improvement continue.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 02, 2023, 10:05:11 AM
Basically over it. Now it's pretty much just the reduced energy level which seems not to leave anybody soon enough. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: vandermolen on March 02, 2023, 10:40:32 AM
Today some leaked WhatsApp messages from a former (disgraced) Health Secretary here in the UK revealed that, at one stage during the early days of the pandemic, the government was considering ordering the public to 'EXTERMINATE ALL CATS' in the UK.
PS Don't show this message to Pohjola's Daughter!
 :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 02, 2023, 11:04:34 AM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 09:21:08 AMit is extremely unlikely that the virus jumped to humans in a zoonotic event, and FAR more likely that it was engineered by humans.

I read that as well. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 11:29:25 AM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 09:21:08 AM"The scientists" presumes there is a widely-held scientific consensus on this. There is certainly a consensus among certain scientists associated with public-health agencies, but how widely-held it is appears to be debatable. And it is clear that some other scientists have different views. Just today I read a post on the AAAS Science forums from a retired biologist who gave a very detailed and technical argument for why, in his opinion, it is extremely unlikely that the virus jumped to humans in a zoonotic event, and FAR more likely that it was engineered by humans.

(I am not a biologist and cannot vouch for the correctness of his argument. I'm only saying that there are scientists with what, to them, are very sound scientific reasons for the lab-leak hypothesis.)

Yes, well, it was also possible for a great many years to wheel out certain scientists who didn't think human-caused climate change was a thing. Look where that got us.

I'm not even going to be the first person to point out in this conversation that the way science works means there is never going to be a complete consensus on anything. But my original point was that it's a question for scientists, not intelligence agencies. Just as climate change was a question for scientists, not politicians and Rupert Murdoch.

And while I agree the science on this is not completely settled, there is more support for Covid being zoonotic. The latest US intelligence report actually led to at least one article nicely setting out scientists discussing whether the intelligence report made sense, though I can't remember off the top of my head where I saw that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 02, 2023, 11:35:07 AM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on March 02, 2023, 10:05:11 AMBasically over it. Now it's pretty much just the reduced energy level which seems not to leave anybody soon enough.

Excellent news.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 02, 2023, 11:55:17 AM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 09:21:08 AM"The scientists" presumes there is a widely-held scientific consensus on this. There is certainly a consensus among certain scientists associated with public-health agencies, but how widely-held it is appears to be debatable. And it is clear that some other scientists have different views. Just today I read a post on the AAAS Science forums from a retired biologist who gave a very detailed and technical argument for why, in his opinion, it is extremely unlikely that the virus jumped to humans in a zoonotic event, and FAR more likely that it was engineered by humans.

(I am not a biologist and cannot vouch for the correctness of his argument. I'm only saying that there are scientists with what, to them, are very sound scientific reasons for the lab-leak hypothesis.)
I suppose that people will be debating this for a long long time.

Quote from: vandermolen on March 02, 2023, 10:40:32 AMToday some leaked WhatsApp messages from a former (disgraced) Health Secretary here in the UK revealed that, at one stage during the early days of the pandemic, the government was considering ordering the public to 'EXTERMINATE ALL CATS' in the UK.
PS Don't show this message to Pohjola's Daughter!
 :o  :o  :o
What the f*(#?!  Is there any validity behind this story?  No idea what WhatsApp is.  If anything, I suspect that someone was making a flippant remark...though thinking back, I remember China told people to bring in any/all of their pet bunnies.  :'(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 02, 2023, 11:59:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 02, 2023, 11:55:17 AMNo idea what WhatsApp is.

 :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 02, 2023, 12:23:30 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 02, 2023, 11:59:30 AM:o  :o  :o

I've heard of it before, but have only a few downloaded apps on my cell phone (both bird ID programs).  So, tell me about it.  Why does it matter/importance (if it is)?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 12:25:04 PM
One of the recent summaries of why the evidence for a zoonotic virus is strong. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/28/1160162845/what-does-the-science-say-about-the-origin-of-the-sars-cov-2-pandemic
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 12:25:04 PMOne of the recent summaries of why the evidence for a zoonotic virus is strong. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/28/1160162845/what-does-the-science-say-about-the-origin-of-the-sars-cov-2-pandemic

Yep, read that as well (and actually, posted the link to the AAAS forum). I was a little baffled that Worobey would consider the geographic distribution of the initial cases such convincing evidence, since there is a simple alternative scenario to zoonosis AT the market: patient zero (be they an infected researcher from the WIV or someone infected through zoonosis elsewhere) visits the market and infects someone who works there, then becomes ill, stays home and never infects anyone else. But the fact that samples from animal stalls at the market tested positive for actual SARS-CoV-2 could only be explained if that worker was also an animal handler or someone tasked with cleaning out the stalls, and it's still hard to explain that way the apparent fact that the infected stalls were precisely the ones used to house species (like raccoon dogs) that are known to be susceptible to bat coronaviruses.

Still, if the scientist on AAAS (who was, by the way, a biotech entrepreneur and not a retired biologist, my bad there) is correct, it does sound quite a bit less likely that the insertion of the so-called furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 genome could have happened naturally. For those better versed than I in microbiology, it might be worthwhile to read Nobel laureate David Baltimore's take on this (https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/the-debate-over-origins-of-sars-cov-2). He was one of the earliest proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis and at first considered that insertion a "smoking gun" for human engineering, though he was more guarded in his comments at the above link.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 02, 2023, 02:12:28 PM
Quote from: vandermolen on March 02, 2023, 10:40:32 AMToday some leaked WhatsApp messages from a former (disgraced) Health Secretary here in the UK revealed that, at one stage during the early days of the pandemic, the government was considering ordering the public to 'EXTERMINATE ALL CATS' in the UK.
PS Don't show this message to Pohjola's Daughter!
 :o  :o  :o
Yikes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 02:14:14 PM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 01:29:01 PMYep, read that as well (and actually, posted the link to the AAAS forum). I was a little baffled that Worobey would consider the geographic distribution of the initial cases such convincing evidence, since there is a simple alternative scenario to zoonosis AT the market: patient zero (be they an infected researcher from the WIV or someone infected through zoonosis elsewhere) visits the market and infects someone who works there, then becomes ill, stays home and never infects anyone else. But the fact that samples from animal stalls at the market tested positive for actual SARS-CoV-2 could only be explained if that worker was also an animal handler or someone tasked with cleaning out the stalls, and it's still hard to explain that way the apparent fact that the infected stalls were precisely the ones used to house species (like raccoon dogs) that are known to be susceptible to bat coronaviruses.

Still, if the scientist on AAAS (who was, by the way, a biotech entrepreneur and not a retired biologist, my bad there) is correct, it does sound quite a bit less likely that the insertion of the so-called furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 genome could have happened naturally. For those better versed than I in microbiology, it might be worthwhile to read Nobel laureate David Baltimore's take on this (https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/the-debate-over-origins-of-sars-cov-2). He was one of the earliest proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis and at first considered that insertion a "smoking gun" for human engineering, though he was more guarded in his comments at the above link.

The David Baltimore article is interesting, thanks. And yes, there's a distinct shift in his tone there. He basically seems to be saying either lab or natural is a possible explanation for the sequence.

I can't recall who it was I heard on a podcast quite early on saying that in their view the virus did NOT have the signs they would expect from human manipulation of the genome. I would have to go hunting to find it again and how much detail there was as to what signs they were looking for.

The other obvious problem with the hypothesis of a lab worker infecting the market is not just that the lab worker hasn't been identified, but the theory involves infecting ONLY the market and not anywhere else. Not family, neighbours, any other kind of contact.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 02:14:14 PMThe other obvious problem with the hypothesis of a lab worker infecting the market is not just that the lab worker hasn't been identified, but the theory involves infecting ONLY the market and not anywhere else. Not family, neighbours, any other kind of contact.

It's not necessarily a problem - depends on the sequence of events and how much contact the person (who may or may not have been a lab worker in this scenario) had with other people. We assume that someone who goes to the market has lots of contact with many other people, but that isn't necessarily true. If it were *me*, I might leave my job, go directly to the market, interact with people there, then go directly home and (especially if living alone, as I do) not interact with anyone else except people at work. And if it WAS a researcher... we don't know for sure what precautions were taken at the WIV, but they SHOULD have (and might have) used PPE extensively and were not exposed to each other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 05:58:25 PM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 05:23:48 PMIt's not necessarily a problem - depends on the sequence of events and how much contact the person (who may or may not have been a lab worker in this scenario) had with other people. We assume that someone who goes to the market has lots of contact with many other people, but that isn't necessarily true. If it were *me*, I might leave my job, go directly to the market, interact with people there, then go directly home and (especially if living alone, as I do) not interact with anyone else except people at work. And if it WAS a researcher... we don't know for sure what precautions were taken at the WIV, but they SHOULD have (and might have) used PPE extensively and were not exposed to each other.

I wasn't suggesting within the lab but more generally. Yes, there are ways of constructing a scenario of transmission, the main problem is how you have to construct a scenario, without anything to back it up beyond wanting to justify a laboratory origin.

The origin in the market has a lot more positive evidence to support transmission, including the positive traces of the virus on equipment. Which of course wouldn't matter if there was clear evidence of an unnatural, engineered virus. But most scientists seem comfortable that the virus has characteristics consistent with a natural origin.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 07:28:04 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 05:58:25 PMI wasn't suggesting within the lab but more generally. Yes, there are ways of constructing a scenario of transmission, the main problem is how you have to construct a scenario, without anything to back it up beyond wanting to justify a laboratory origin.

The origin in the market has a lot more positive evidence to support transmission, including the positive traces of the virus on equipment. Which of course wouldn't matter if there was clear evidence of an unnatural, engineered virus. But most scientists seem comfortable that the virus has characteristics consistent with a natural origin.

Oh I agree, we don't know and will probably never know, for certain, the origin of the virus, especially now given the tensions between China and the West. My position on this is firmly agnostic since there are pretty strong signs that point in both directions, at least David Baltimore's original line of reasoning does point pretty strongly, though not conclusively, to an engineered virus and yet, as you say, we have positive samples from the stalls at the market. I guess what I'm saying is that the scenarios that entail the market only being an incidental epicenter and not the actual spillover site don't strike me as that far-fetched. Maybe it's because of my own lifestyle - I could easily imagine myself infecting a small number of people at a market and then no one else. To me, the two leading theories seem equally plausible, and I have really no reason to favor one over the other.

Do we really need to KNOW which it was to take steps to prevent another pandemic? I don't think so. We need to make sure that gain-of-function research on pathogens takes place only in facilities and by researchers equipped with the best containment hardware and following the strictest biohazard protocols. And we also need to reduce contact between humans and wild animals to make zoonotic spillover less likely. That way we cover all bases regardless of where SARS-CoV-2 actually came from.

Whether we can actually DO these things as a practical matter, of course, is another question. :(
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 08:12:37 PM
Quote from: krummholz on March 02, 2023, 07:28:04 PMDo we really need to KNOW which it was to take steps to prevent another pandemic? I don't think so. We need to make sure that gain-of-function research on pathogens takes place only in facilities and by researchers equipped with the best containment hardware and following the strictest biohazard protocols. And we also need to reduce contact between humans and wild animals to make zoonotic spillover less likely. That way we cover all bases regardless of where SARS-CoV-2 actually came from.

Whether we can actually DO these things as a practical matter, of course, is another question. :(

Completely agree with you on this. Frankly none of this was a surprise to people in the field who have warned about the possibility of novel diseases, and about the lack of preparedness, for many years.

But it is in the way of things that people remember for a little while why something was important and then forget and it ceases being a priority. In the USA, George W Bush invested a lot in pandemic preparedness because, after 9/11 (terrorism) and Hurricane Katrina (natural disaster response), he didn't want to also be caught out on the other big threat he was warned about. But by the time of Trump lots of people considered Bush's level of disease preparedness to be a big waste of money.

Of course it's all a "waste" when the risk never eventuates. But that's how risk management works. See also Y2K and all the people who wrongly believe the bug wasn't a big deal precisely BECAUSE the risk was managed well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 02, 2023, 08:38:27 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 05:48:36 PMThere is no reason to go looking for the laboratory at fault when the scientists say the virus shows no sign of being FROM a laboratory, ANY laboratory, in the first place. Starting with the existence of a laboratory in Wuhan is exactly backwards. You need to start with a laboratory-engineered virus, and then of course working out which laboratory engineered it would be fairly straightforward in the circumstances.

You've gone a little too far there. The preponderance of evidence seems to indicate that the virus was a product of natural processes rather than engineering. This does not rule out a laboratory event, since a virus collected from the wild and under study could have infected a worker, who brought it out into the general population. That worker could have gone to the wet market where crowded conditions could have led to rapid spread. I'm more inclined to believe that the spread was natural because of Occam's razor, the simpler explanation is more likely to be true.

As far as the DoE now claiming they have "new intelligence" supporting the lab leak version, I find that utterly unconvincing. There is no evidence they are willing to put forward. When these intelligence agencies don't have a clue they have to make something up. I suspect that is what is happening.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 09:21:32 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 02, 2023, 08:38:27 PMYou've gone a little too far there. The preponderance of evidence seems to indicate that the virus was a product of natural processes rather than engineering. This does not rule out a laboratory event, since a virus collected from the wild and under study could have infected a worker, who brought it out into the general population. That worker could have gone to the wet market where crowded conditions could have led to rapid spread. I'm more inclined to believe that the spread was natural because of Occam's razor, the simpler explanation is more likely to be true.

As far as the DoE now claiming they have "new intelligence" supporting the lab leak version, I find that utterly unconvincing. There is no evidence they are willing to put forward. When these intelligence agencies don't have a clue they have to make something up. I suspect that is what is happening.

I think I've pretty much addressed this in conversation with Krummholz. The point I was making is that you don't start with intelligence agencies finding the perpetrator, you start with scientists determining whether there is any perpetrator at all.

As I understand it the argument for a natural virus is not solely a jump from a wild animal to a person, but mixing between species before human transmission was possible. This is fairly well known as a mechanism (eg flu strains develop in China when birds and pigs are kept together).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 03, 2023, 01:13:30 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 02, 2023, 12:23:30 PMI've heard of it before, but have only a few downloaded apps on my cell phone (both bird ID programs).  So, tell me about it.  Why does it matter/importance (if it is)?

PD

You can have video-calls (including multiple users), write messages, share files and location, stuff like that. It's as widely used and known as Google, hence my surprise.  ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 04, 2023, 01:21:40 PM
Quote from: Florestan on March 03, 2023, 01:13:30 AMYou can have video-calls (including multiple users), write messages, share files and location, stuff like that. It's as widely used and known as Google, hence my surprise.  ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp)


The tiny bit that I later googled about it, it seems that it's more popular in Europe (and maybe elsewhere--I forget--vs in the US).

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 04, 2023, 02:01:52 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 04, 2023, 01:21:40 PMThe tiny bit that I later googled about it, it seems that it's more popular in Europe (and maybe elsewhere--I forget--vs in the US).

PD

I use it primarily as a text messaging app, although it supports images and other attachments and voice and video(?) calls. (Similar to iMessage, but not restricted to Apple users). It came from Silicon Valley and is now owned by Facebook.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: greg on March 04, 2023, 05:52:54 PM
Quote from: Madiel on February 28, 2023, 05:48:36 PMNot the very specific thing they were studying. Unless you think "viruses" is specific.

If we are going to continue with this analogy, there was no proof that a robbery was involved. It reminds me of a relative of my mother who insisted she was robbed when my mother was pretty darn sure the relative just left something behind when leaving a train.

This again gets back to the problem with relying on intelligence agencies for this stuff. They are trained to find your "robber", so they are inevitably going to look for one rather than taking a step back and asking whether anyone at all was robbed.
Maybe it's not the best analogy, because robberies are intentional, while I don't suspect the leak was intentional (I mean, it could be, but I'm not really on that side of the fence unless it was proven). So maybe I'm just being confusing.



Quote from: Madiel on March 02, 2023, 05:58:25 PMI wasn't suggesting within the lab but more generally. Yes, there are ways of constructing a scenario of transmission, the main problem is how you have to construct a scenario, without anything to back it up beyond wanting to justify a laboratory origin.
Well, the only information I've found regarding details about what was going on with lab at the time, the whole "scenario," was the video I shared a while back, a few months after Covid started.

They were studying bat corona viruses at the time, people from the lab go missing during the exact weeks when Covid was first discovered, etc. Just seems like people that work at the lab could easily have walked over to the market, as a normal person, and infected the place before they knew they were sick. I know it's faaaaar from ideal, it's not HARD evidence, and we have to speculate a bit, but it's the only thing we have, really.



Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 04, 2023, 01:21:40 PMThe tiny bit that I later googled about it, it seems that it's more popular in Europe (and maybe elsewhere--I forget--vs in the US).

PD
Right. The only reason I know if it is because of work, and most of the people I work with are from India. Before that, I never even heard of it when they introduced it to me a few years ago.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 05, 2023, 04:21:26 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 04, 2023, 02:01:52 PMI use it primarily as a text messaging app, although it supports images and other attachments and voice and video(?) calls. (Similar to iMessage, but not restricted to Apple users). It came from Silicon Valley and is now owned by Facebook.
Thanks for the info.  I have IM and FaceTime on my Macs.  The only other program/app that I've used is one through a doctor's office for live video chats.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 06, 2023, 06:44:10 AM
From Newsweek: America' COVID Response Was Based on Lies (https://www.newsweek.com/america-covid-response-was-based-lies-opinion-1785177)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 06, 2023, 11:50:25 AM
Well that guy doesn't understand science at all.

But of course neither does Todd.

It's fairly evident that now that Todd has lost the platform to post the nuttiest Republican views on how Russia is protecting itself in Ukraine, he's just going to come here and post the nuttiest Republican views on Covid. I expect the results to be equally edifying.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 06, 2023, 12:22:58 PM
When Beijing calls you a bullshi**er ....

Chinese state media calls out Elon Musk over coronavirus tweet
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on March 06, 2023, 02:50:39 PM
Does Todd actually believe the uneloborated and unsupported claims that Scott fucking Atlas is making unconvincingly there?

Or does he just once again want to have a stir, to enjoy watching everyone react?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 06, 2023, 03:12:06 PM
Quote from: SimonNZ on March 06, 2023, 02:50:39 PMDoes Todd actually believe the uneloborated and unsupported claims that Scott fucking Atlas is making unconvincingly there?

Or does he just once again want to have a stir, to enjoy watching everyone react?
My guess is he enjoys being a ****-stirrer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 07, 2023, 02:35:08 AM
Novak Djokivic's bid for a waiver to enter the United States has failed.

The real news is that the US Open and the USTA threw their support behind Djokovic's attempt at receiving special permission to enter the United States without vaccination. Imo, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard and worse than the Australian counterparts.


https://sports.yahoo.com/novak-djokovic-withdraws-from-indian-wells-ahead-of-draw-after-losing-covid-19-vaccine-waiver-043446458.html
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 07, 2023, 04:28:55 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 07, 2023, 02:35:08 AMNovak Djokivic's bid for a waiver to enter the United States has failed.

The article must have the wrong date stamp.  This must be from March 2022 and not this year.  Either that, or Yahoo took an article from The Onion seriously.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 07, 2023, 05:03:05 AM
From the World Bank: COVID-19's Impact on Young People Risks a Lost Generation (https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/02/16/covid-19-s-impact-on-young-people-risks-a-lost-generation)

This summary contains a link to a twenty-five page report.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 07, 2023, 08:47:55 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 07, 2023, 02:35:08 AMThe real news is that the US Open and the USTA threw their support behind Djokovic's attempt at receiving special permission to enter the United States without vaccination. Imo, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard and worse than the Australian counterparts.
Money over public health considerations: especially hypocritical of sports organizations, yes?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 07, 2023, 12:42:19 PM
Quote from: Karl Tirebiter Henning on March 07, 2023, 08:47:55 AMMoney over public health considerations: especially hypocritical of sports organizations, yes?

Yes.
I knew that USTA and USOpen were sexist organizations, but didn't know that they were that corrupt and defiant.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 07, 2023, 12:48:34 PM
It's professional sport. It's designed to make money. He's a huge draw card. He's a brilliant tennis player.

Unfortunately he also has some slightly woo woo ideas about health and medicine.

I wasn't actually aware until this story that the USA hadn't relaxed its travel rules to the same degree that Australia has. Quite surprising to be honest.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 07, 2023, 12:52:17 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 07, 2023, 12:48:34 PMI wasn't actually aware until this story that the USA hadn't relaxed its travel rules to the same degree that Australia has. Quite surprising to be honest.

+ 1.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 08, 2023, 10:12:13 AM
A new study found 59 percent of long-COVID patients had organ damage, but experts say it's not that simple
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 14, 2023, 07:55:19 AM
From the United States Congress Committee on Oversight and Accountability:

COVID Origins Hearing Wrap Up: Facts, Science, Evidence Point to a Wuhan Lab Leak (https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak/)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 14, 2023, 12:18:30 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 14, 2023, 07:55:19 AMFrom the United States Congress Committee on Oversight and Accountability:

COVID Origins Hearing Wrap Up: Facts, Science, Evidence Point to a Wuhan Lab Leak (https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak/)



As soon as someone uses the phrase "mainstream media", rather then just "media", my assessment of their credibility drops.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 17, 2023, 04:57:45 AM
From The Weather Channel (?): New Research Indicates COVID-19 Pandemic May Have Originated in Raccoon Dogs of Wuhan Market in China (https://weather.com/en-IN/india/coronavirus/news/2023-03-17-covid-19-pandemic-may-have-originated-in-raccoon-dogs-in-wuhan)

Bats, pangolins, and raccoon dogs all have one thing in common: they taste great when deep fried.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 18, 2023, 09:24:45 AM

    W.H.O. Accuses China of Hiding Data That May Link Covid's Origins to Animals (https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/health/covid-origins-who.html)

With huge amounts of genetic information drawn from swabs of animal cages, carts and other surfaces at the Wuhan market in early 2020, the genetic data had been the focus of restless anticipation among virus experts since they learned of it a year ago in a paper by Chinese scientists.

A French biologist discovered the genetic sequences in the database last week, and she and a team of colleagues began mining them for clues about the origins of the pandemic.

That team has not yet released a paper outlining the findings. But the researchers delivered an analysis of the material to a W.H.O. advisory group studying Covid's origins this week in a meeting that also included a presentation by Chinese researchers regarding the same data.

The analysis seemed to clash with earlier contentions by Chinese scientists that samples taken in the market that were positive for the coronavirus had been ferried in by sick people alone, said Sarah Cobey, an epidemiologist and evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago who was not involved in the recent research.


     The Chinese are not happy with the most plausible and well evidenced theory that animals from the wet market infected humans. They want the story to be humans brought the virus into China.

     The best that can be said for the lab leak theory is that it's possible. It's that bad.

Dr. Cobey was one of 18 scientists who signed an influential letter in the journal Science in May 2021 urging serious consideration of a scenario in which the virus could have spilled out of a laboratory in Wuhan.

On Friday, she said lab leaks continued to pose enormous risks and that more oversight of research into dangerous pathogens was needed. But Dr. Cobey added that an accumulation of evidence — relating to the clustering of human cases around the Wuhan market, the genetic diversity of viruses there, and now the raccoon dog data — strengthened the case for a market origin.


     
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 18, 2023, 11:59:08 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 18, 2023, 09:24:45 AMThe best that can be said for the lab leak theory is that it's possible. It's that bad.
By it's that bad, do you mean the theory is that weak?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on March 19, 2023, 07:27:17 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on March 18, 2023, 11:59:08 AMBy it's that bad, do you mean the theory is that weak?

    It's a "low confidence" theory according to the Energy Dept. assessment.

    A NYTimes article says:

Scientists who have studied the genetics of the virus, and the patterns by which it spread, say the most likely cause is that the virus jumped from live mammals to humans — a phenomenon known as "zoonotic spillover" — at the Huanan market, where the first cases of Covid-19 emerged in late 2019.

But other scientists say circumstantial evidence points to the virus having escaped from a lab, possibly the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which had deep expertise in researching coronaviruses. Lab mistakes do happen: In 2014, after accidents involving bird flu and anthrax, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tightened its biosafety practices.


    The lab leak theory is about something that might have happened. The wet market theory is about evidence that something did happen.

   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 19, 2023, 08:18:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 19, 2023, 07:27:17 AMThe lab leak theory is about something that might have happened. The wet market theory is about evidence that something did happen. 

I would not place much stock in how much "confidence" a government agency has in a particular assessment, and the evidence in favor of the lab leak theory is not entirely circumstantial.

I've been following a very interesting discussion on one of the AAAS forums. According to one gentleman on that forum, a biotech entrepreneur, the presence of a furin cleavage site in the SARS CoV-2 genome is extremely unlikely to have come about except by human manipulation, because no closely related coronavirus has such a site, and because if it developed somehow in a mammal other than man, it would reduce, rather than enhance, the virus's transmissibility.

The strongest argument against the lab leak theory is the fact that samples of the virus itself were found in stalls that housed the most susceptible species at the Wuhan market. The only way the lab leak theory can explain that finding is by a worker at the market who was infected by exposure to someone infected at the lab, and then transmitted the virus to an animal - reverse zoonosis, another possible but very unlikely event.

So it seems that whichever theory you prefer, the other theory's proponents have an argument that seems to rule out your favored theory.

I'm highly skeptical of both arguments since each relies on an intuitive notion of "very unlikely" or "extremely unlikely", and human intuition about probability is famously unreliable - most beliefs in the paranormal are a consequence of that fact.

(Of course, one possibility is that the furin codon found its way onto the virus inside a HUMAN host, perhaps an immunocompromised person who was infected with a different virus that does have the furin codon. That theory doesn't involve a lab, but also requires reverse zoonosis to explain the findings from the market stall samples.)

I don't think we have enough evidence to draw a firm conclusion about the virus's origins, and very likely we never will.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2023, 08:20:43 AM
Quote from: drogulus on March 19, 2023, 07:27:17 AMIt's a "low confidence" theory according to the Energy Dept. assessment.
Yes, exactly. The Endergy Dept would not be alone there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 19, 2023, 12:31:52 PM
I'm still mystified how something called the Energy Department is an intelligence agency. Never mind one dabbling in virology.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 19, 2023, 01:06:43 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 19, 2023, 12:31:52 PMI'm still mystified how something called the Energy Department is an intelligence agency. Never mind one dabbling in virology.
You and me, both, really ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 20, 2023, 02:02:33 AM
New Evidence Supports Animal Origin of COVID Virus - Scientific American.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-evidence-supports-animal-origin-of-covid-virus-through-raccoon-dogs/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 20, 2023, 04:48:02 AM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 20, 2023, 02:02:33 AMNew Evidence Supports Animal Origin of COVID Virus - Scientific American.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-evidence-supports-animal-origin-of-covid-virus-through-raccoon-dogs/

Just to point out that this is not new, independent evidence, but another article detailing the same evidence that has been mentioned here before (including by yours truly this weekend).

The RNA evidence from the market is the strongest evidence for the zoonosis theory yet, but even this article concedes that it is not conclusive:

QuoteThe new evidence does not directly prove that SARS-CoV-2 jumped into humans from infected raccoon dogs, but it adds to a growing body of evidence in favor of a spillover from animals.

"These data do not provide a definitive answer to the question of how the pandemic began, but every piece of data is important in moving us closer to that answer," said the World Health Organization's director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a news briefing on Friday.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:06:46 AM
Quote from: krummholz on March 19, 2023, 08:18:43 AMI would not place much stock in how much "confidence" a government agency has in a particular assessment, and the evidence in favor of the lab leak theory is not entirely circumstantial.

I've been following a very interesting discussion on one of the AAAS forums. According to one gentleman on that forum, a biotech entrepreneur, the presence of a furin cleavage site in the SARS CoV-2 genome is extremely unlikely to have come about except by human manipulation, because no closely related coronavirus has such a site, and because if it developed somehow in a mammal other than man, it would reduce, rather than enhance, the virus's transmissibility.

The strongest argument against the lab leak theory is the fact that samples of the virus itself were found in stalls that housed the most susceptible species at the Wuhan market. The only way the lab leak theory can explain that finding is by a worker at the market who was infected by exposure to someone infected at the lab, and then transmitted the virus to an animal - reverse zoonosis, another possible but very unlikely event.

So it seems that whichever theory you prefer, the other theory's proponents have an argument that seems to rule out your favored theory.

I'm highly skeptical of both arguments since each relies on an intuitive notion of "very unlikely" or "extremely unlikely", and human intuition about probability is famously unreliable - most beliefs in the paranormal are a consequence of that fact.

(Of course, one possibility is that the furin codon found its way onto the virus inside a HUMAN host, perhaps an immunocompromised person who was infected with a different virus that does have the furin codon. That theory doesn't involve a lab, but also requires reverse zoonosis to explain the findings from the market stall samples.)

I don't think we have enough evidence to draw a firm conclusion about the virus's origins, and very likely we never will.

These are articles in respected, peer-reviewed scientific journals:

Furin cleavage sites naturally occur in coronaviruses

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506120304165

SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site was not engineered

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119

There is a history to this. When the SARS-CoV-2 sequence was first published some self-appointed "experts" who had no detailed knowledge of coronavirus claimed that the Furin cleavage site was proof it was engineered. Then the Coronavirus community collectively replied, "WTF, all Coronaviruses have Furin cleavage sites!" Of course, that didn't prevent conspiracy theorists to latching on the the initial mistake.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:14:28 AM
People sure seem to need to believe in something.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:16:25 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:14:28 AMPeople sure seem to need to believe in something.

And some people seem to need to believe in nothing.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:18:35 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:16:25 AMAnd some people seem to need to believe in nothing.

When one relies on verified facts only, belief is not needed.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:24:26 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:18:35 AMWhen one relies on verified facts only, belief is not needed.

Pointing out that a claim made about the SARS-CoV-2 is contrary to established evidence (that furin cleavage sites are a common feature of coronavirus) is not "belief."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:30:04 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:24:26 AMPointing out that a claim made about the SARS-CoV-2 is contrary to established evidence (that furin cleavage sites are a common feature of coronavirus) is not "belief."

The science on the origin of the disease is not settled at this time.  That is a fact. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:42:10 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:30:04 AMThe science on the origin of the disease is not settled at this time.  That is a fact.

I didn't say the origin of the virus is settled. I said that that claim that a furin cleavage site is not found in coronavirus and had to be engineered is demonstrably false.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:49:14 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:42:10 AMI said that that claim that a furin cleavage site is not found in coronavirus and had to be engineered is demonstrably false.

You are not qualified to make that assessment, even after having read several articles. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 06:10:15 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 20, 2023, 05:49:14 AMYou are not qualified to make that assessment, even after having read several articles. 

How do you know that? :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 20, 2023, 06:55:56 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 06:10:15 AMHow do you know that? :)

You would have broadcast your bona fides and you would have referenced technical jargon much sooner.  You also would have referenced academic articles, typically with limited access to the general public, with more robust evidence supporting your claims.

By all means, if you are a virologist or specialist in a related field that would provide you with qualifications to offer more than a hobbyist's knowledge, enlighten everyone here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 20, 2023, 11:01:51 AM
Quote from: krummholz on March 20, 2023, 04:48:02 AMJust to point out that this is not new, independent evidence, but another article detailing the same evidence that has been mentioned here before (including by yours truly this weekend).

The RNA evidence from the market is the strongest evidence for the zoonosis theory yet, but even this article concedes that it is not conclusive:


For topics like this, I like reading scientific/academic publications (that's why I don't read this thread). In natural science, and more in social science, conclusive/perfect evidences are effectually impossible even if a correlation is 0.93. Only non-professionals claim "conclusive" evidence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 20, 2023, 12:19:38 PM
Todd is always good at pointing out the supposed lack of expertise of others.

Todd never draws attention to his own total lack of expertise.

PS I majored in biochemistry at university. I at least know what the fuck a cleavage site is.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 20, 2023, 12:22:51 PM
Quote from: Dry Brett Kavanaugh on March 20, 2023, 11:01:51 AMOnly non-professionals claim "conclusive" evidence.
Oh, and I have a theory about that ....
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 20, 2023, 12:41:39 PM
Also... I can scarcely begin to unpack all of the things that are so utterly wrong with suggesting that only experts are allowed to read other experts.

Not that Todd actually believes this. I mean, he merrily reads all sorts of things and then posts them here, clearly with the intention that other people read them and derive "beliefs" from them. It's just that when anyone else does the same (and does it with a lot more intelligent narrative and effort rather than pasting a link and maybe uttering a one line quip) that suddenly Todd wants to put someone in their place.

This is because Todd is a hypocrite. As well as a troll. Those aren't quite synonyms but one is definitely a characteristic of the other.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 09:39:43 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 20, 2023, 06:55:56 AMYou would have broadcast your bona fides and you would have referenced technical jargon much sooner.  You also would have referenced academic articles, typically with limited access to the general public, with more robust evidence supporting your claims.

By all means, if you are a virologist or specialist in a related field that would provide you with qualifications to offer more than a hobbyist's knowledge, enlighten everyone here.

It would be pretty ridiculous for me to tout my credentials or use technical jargon on a non-specialist discussion site like this. I think it serves a purpose when unsubstantiated "conspiracy theories" are pushed to point out reliable sources of information that reflect the most reliable scientific evidence. A thoughtful non-specialist can probably get the gist of these studies from the abstracts, although a specialist would want to pour over the text, supplemental material and references. And I would hope that a thoughtful person would recognize that an article published in, for instance, The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, carries more weight than something that a self-described expert posted on a discussion board. If my comments carry any weight it is because of the nature of the sources I cite, not because I have puffed myself up as an "expert."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 21, 2023, 04:12:42 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 09:39:43 PMIt would be pretty ridiculous for me to tout my credentials or use technical jargon on a non-specialist discussion site like this. I think it serves a purpose when unsubstantiated "conspiracy theories" are pushed to point out reliable sources of information that reflect the most reliable scientific evidence. A thoughtful non-specialist can probably get the gist of these studies from the abstracts, although a specialist would want to pour over the text, supplemental material and references. And I would hope that a thoughtful person would recognize that an article published in, for instance, The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, carries more weight than something that a self-described expert posted on a discussion board. If my comments carry any weight it is because of the nature of the sources I cite, not because I have puffed myself up as an "expert."

It's OK to be a hobbyist.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 21, 2023, 09:33:49 AM
There has been some great, nuanced, intelligent discussion in this thread recently. Let's make sure to keep it that way and not get personal. Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 21, 2023, 02:21:08 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 20, 2023, 05:06:46 AMThese are articles in respected, peer-reviewed scientific journals:

Furin cleavage sites naturally occur in coronaviruses

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506120304165

SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site was not engineered

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119

There is a history to this. When the SARS-CoV-2 sequence was first published some self-appointed "experts" who had no detailed knowledge of coronavirus claimed that the Furin cleavage site was proof it was engineered. Then the Coronavirus community collectively replied, "WTF, all Coronaviruses have Furin cleavage sites!" Of course, that didn't prevent conspiracy theorists to latching on the the initial mistake.


First, I am NOT arguing in favor of the lab-leak theory, just to make that clear. I am saying that both leading theories have been criticized in ways that seem to make them equally implausible, yet there are really no other possible ways the virus could have emerged. My main point was that all of these criticisms rely on notoriously unreliable, intuitive notions of probability and appeal to the same kinds of arguments that have been used to defend claims of paranormal phenomena, and should (IMO) inspire extreme skepticism on those grounds alone.

However... labeling all arguments that further the claim that the virus was the product of gain-of-function research as "conspiracy theories" because a paper that refutes one of them appeared in a peer-reviewed journal is not really a relevant argument, either. (Peer review is not a guarantee of correctness.) The gentleman I paraphrased was NOT by any means saying that furin cleavage sites were rare in coronaviruses, or even in sarbecoviruses. He was saying that the specific 12-nucleotide insertion at S1/S2 did not exist in the most closely related coronaviruses, something the paper at your first link also states in an early paragraph. He further argued that while it could have occurred naturally, in most non-human mammals that codon would have been an evolutionary disadvantage. Again, I am not saying that this argument is necessarily correct - it may well be dead wrong, I am not qualified to assess it in detail - but it is a carefully nuanced argument and not a conspiracy theory.

Also, the idea that the furin codon on SARS-CoV-2 was a "smoking gun" for human engineering came originally not from some anonymous, self-anointed expert, but from Nobel laureate biologist and virologist David Baltimore. Baltimore has since backed off that assessment a little, but even his most recent comments drip with skepticism that the virus could have emerged entirely naturally. I've lost the link to that interview and don't have time at the moment to look for it, but I'm sure I could dig it up tomorrow if anyone is interested.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 21, 2023, 03:13:49 PM
You posted the link previously, because I remember reading it. In my view he had backed away from his previous comments a heck of a lot. EDIT: Found it again, he basically seems to have moved to saying he has no opinion one way or the other.

Also, one of the articles Spotted Horses posted says that a 12-nucleotide insertion isn't involved, only 4 nucleotides. It also points out things about the sequence that aren't logical for a human-engineered sequence.

I think it's very easy for people to reason that if something looks significant to humans, it must have been GIVEN significance. The reality is that shuffling of genetic sequences is happening constantly, and the great majority of them do absolutely nothing in practice and so we ignore them, or simply never see them.

The microbiological world is a bit like that room full of monkeys with typewriters, only typing much much faster than the monkeys ever could and the room is huge. And some of this feels a bit like people think it's not possible that one of the monkeys could have managed to accidentally type the word "beach".  When of course no-one is going to comment on the many, many times that the same monkey generated nonsense.

Meanwhile, generic shuffling has kept going since the virus jumped to humans, and as far as I know no-one is claiming THAT process has been engineered even though it led to strains that were much better at infecting humans.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 21, 2023, 04:25:58 PM
Sorry if I read more into k.'s post than was intended.

The fact that the novel coronavirus deviated a lot from the most closely related virus we know of is a very weak statement because we know of a very limited subset of the viruses that are out there. It presumably evolved from a viral strain we have no knowledge of.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on March 21, 2023, 05:14:49 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 21, 2023, 03:13:49 PMYou posted the link previously, because I remember reading it. In my view he had backed away from his previous comments a heck of a lot. EDIT: Found it again, he basically seems to have moved to saying he has no opinion one way or the other.

I'd have to reread the interview to see if my impression changes - my recollection is that he concedes that it might have arisen naturally, but that it still looks like a very unlikely occurrence.

QuoteI think it's very easy for people to reason that if something looks significant to humans, it must have been GIVEN significance. The reality is that shuffling of genetic sequences is happening constantly, and the great majority of them do absolutely nothing in practice and so we ignore them, or simply never see them.

The microbiological world is a bit like that room full of monkeys with typewriters, only typing much much faster than the monkeys ever could and the room is huge. And some of this feels a bit like people think it's not possible that one of the monkeys could have managed to accidentally type the word "beach".  When of course no-one is going to comment on the many, many times that the same monkey generated nonsense.

Well put, and that is exactly what I was getting at. Humans tend to have very inaccurate intuition when it comes to situations where the actual sample size is orders of magnitude larger than what we imagine it is. We also don't have a good feel for the probability of *something* that by itself may be very unlikely, but among a collection of many very unlikely outcomes, the chance of ONE of those outcomes occurring at SOME point is not really that small, given sufficient time. As you put it, sooner or later one of the monkeys is going to type "beach" or some other common word, and we typically underestimate by orders of magnitude both the number of possible words and the number of monkeys at work.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on March 22, 2023, 01:46:28 AM
Irrespective of the pandemic's origin, in a normal world all gain-of-function research would be permanently banned worldwide effective immediately and an international body, similar to the IAEA, would be created with the mission to inspect all virology institutes and labs worldwide at least twice a year to make sure the ban is observed and the safety regulations are complied with. Uncooperative countries, institutes or labs would be subjected to international sanctions.

But since we are living in a completely abnormal world, none of that would happen, of course.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 28, 2023, 10:14:27 AM
Opinion — With covid, the long-abused raccoon dog might finally have bitten us back (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/03/28/raccoon-dogs-covid-spillover-host/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on April 18, 2023, 06:05:57 AM
Opinion — Why reports of period weirdness after covid shots were ignored (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/18/period-kate-clancy-coronavirus-vaccines-menstruation/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on April 18, 2023, 06:36:08 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on April 18, 2023, 06:05:57 AMOpinion — Why reports of period weirdness after covid shots were ignored (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/18/period-kate-clancy-coronavirus-vaccines-menstruation/)

Sexism in medical science yet again.

I did hear about this side effect at some point (obviously not relevant to me personally), and it came with an assurance that it wasn't a long-term problem, but I think the article is pretty spot on. It would have been MUCH better if the symptoms were addressed properly before the vaccine rollout.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on April 18, 2023, 07:04:45 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on April 18, 2023, 06:05:57 AMOpinion — Why reports of period weirdness after covid shots were ignored (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/18/period-kate-clancy-coronavirus-vaccines-menstruation/)
That's scary!  :o

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 02, 2023, 09:41:09 AM
In a happy milestone, a Boston hospital [Tufts Medical Center] reports zero inpatients with COVID-19
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 03, 2023, 09:46:11 AM
Cambridge's COVID experiment at giving poor families $500 month will continue, and grow

The city will grow its universal basic income program to cover roughly 2,000 low-income families, no strings attached
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on May 05, 2023, 10:33:41 AM
From the United Nations: WHO chief declares end to COVID-19 as a global health emergency (https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136367)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 10, 2023, 09:44:31 AM
COVID made us retreat into our corners. In some ways, a worrisome new study says, we haven't left them.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on May 10, 2023, 09:13:54 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on May 10, 2023, 09:44:31 AMCOVID made us retreat into our corners. In some ways, a worrisome new study says, we haven't left them.

You didn't provide a link if you were intending to.

But really, something like a pandemic causing permanent social changes is not a surprise. Past events like this have. At some point during the Covid pandemic, a podcast I listen to had an episode about some past examples. Perhaps the most memorable is how the massive famine of 1816 is linked to the invention of the bicycle as a substitute for horses.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Wendell_E on May 11, 2023, 12:27:06 AM
Quote from: Madiel on May 10, 2023, 09:13:54 PMYou didn't provide a link if you were intending to.

But really, something like a pandemic causing permanent social changes is not a surprise. Past events like this have. At some point during the Covid pandemic, a podcast I listen to had an episode about some past examples. Perhaps the most memorable is how the massive famine of 1816 is linked to the invention of the bicycle as a substitute for horses.

I googled and found this article (from yesterday) with that title: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/covid-made-us-retreat-into-our-corners-a-worrisome-new-study-says-we-havent-left-them/ar-AA1b0Sc4
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on May 11, 2023, 07:43:36 AM
Quote from: Madiel on May 10, 2023, 09:13:54 PMYou didn't provide a link if you were intending to.

But really, something like a pandemic causing permanent social changes is not a surprise. Past events like this have. At some point during the Covid pandemic, a podcast I listen to had an episode about some past examples. Perhaps the most memorable is how the massive famine of 1816 is linked to the invention of the bicycle as a substitute for horses.
Here's the link (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/05/10/opinion/covid-reduced-wealthy-poor-interactions/?p1=BGSearch_Overlay_Results).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on May 11, 2023, 12:52:40 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on May 11, 2023, 07:43:36 AMHere's the link (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/05/10/opinion/covid-reduced-wealthy-poor-interactions/?p1=BGSearch_Overlay_Results).

Wants me to subscribe. But thanks.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Florestan on May 11, 2023, 12:55:01 PM
Quote from: Madiel on May 11, 2023, 12:52:40 PMWants me to subscribe.

No, it wants you to leave your corner...  (insert irony emoticon)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 02, 2023, 10:48:59 AM
High concentrations of COVID detected at all 14 New York City wastewater treatment plants (https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/covid-rebound-detected-new-york-city-wastewater/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 05, 2023, 10:30:04 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 02, 2023, 10:48:59 AMHigh concentrations of COVID detected at all 14 New York City wastewater treatment plants (https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/covid-rebound-detected-new-york-city-wastewater/)
Interesting that they say "50 or more per 100,000.  Wonder what the highest number was?  To me that sounds like a low number, but it would also be interesting to know what earlier figures were when they thought there to be low numbers?  And no, I'm not in the medical field.  If a sharp uptick, I would suspect that there might be concerns of a new variant.

Anyone here know more about this?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 05, 2023, 12:31:14 PM
State health rapid response team deployed to Chelsea (Mass.) Veterans' Home after new COVID-19 outbreak
As of midday Monday, 15 residents and 9 staff members had tested positive
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 06, 2023, 01:19:41 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 05, 2023, 12:31:14 PMState health rapid response team deployed to Chelsea (Mass.) Veterans' Home after new COVID-19 outbreak
As of midday Monday, 15 residents and 9 staff members had tested positive
That's horrible news.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on June 23, 2023, 03:38:47 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 02, 2023, 10:48:59 AMHigh concentrations of COVID detected at all 14 New York City wastewater treatment plants (https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/covid-rebound-detected-new-york-city-wastewater/)

I don't get it... Is this possibly a new train, or is the vaccination level too low to reach group immunity?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 23, 2023, 03:56:02 PM
Quote from: Que on June 23, 2023, 03:38:47 PMI don't get it... Is this possibly a new train, or is the vaccination level too low to reach group immunity?

Not sure. In early May, they noted an increase in Boston's wastewater, too. They monitor it as it has at times been an early warning, but happily there has been no increase in cases (I don't think) so perhaps it was just a blip.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 08:15:06 AM
Researchers discover new coronavirus strains—some related to SARS-CoV-2—in bats found in the United Kingdom; viruses do not currently pose a threat to humans, findings inform monitoring for future pandemic risks More (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/245714/monitoring-british-bats-help-identify-coronaviruses/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 08:16:49 AM
Tangentially: US officials identify malaria infections in Texas and Florida, the first locally transmitted cases in the US in two decades More (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/06/27/malaria-cases-united-states-cdc-warning/70359435007/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on June 28, 2023, 09:29:03 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 23, 2023, 03:56:02 PMNot sure. In early May, they noted an increase in Boston's wastewater, too. They monitor it as it has at times been an early warning, but happily there has been no increase in cases (I don't think) so perhaps it was just a blip.
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 08:16:49 AMTangentially: US officials identify malaria infections in Texas and Florida, the first locally transmitted cases in the US in two decades More (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/06/27/malaria-cases-united-states-cdc-warning/70359435007/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter).
Karl, has anyone ever said that "You are the harbinger of bad news"?  ;)

Just kidding....it's been a long day.  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 09:49:08 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on June 28, 2023, 09:29:03 AMKarl, has anyone ever said that "You are the harbinger of bad news"?  ;)

Just kidding....it's been a long day.  :)

PD
Hope the rest of the day treats you gently!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on June 28, 2023, 06:00:33 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 08:15:06 AMResearchers discover new coronavirus strains—some related to SARS-CoV-2—in bats found in the United Kingdom; viruses do not currently pose a threat to humans, findings inform monitoring for future pandemic risks More (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/245714/monitoring-british-bats-help-identify-coronaviruses/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter).

Not really a surprise. We knew about plenty of related viruses (such as SARS-CoV-1!). It's just that a lot more people are paying attention now.

It's the same family of viruses that causes many colds.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on June 28, 2023, 06:13:45 PM
Quote from: Madiel on June 28, 2023, 06:00:33 PMNot really a surprise. We knew about plenty of related viruses (such as SARS-CoV-1!). It's just that a lot more people are paying attention now.

It's the same family of viruses that causes many colds.
Yes, it will be nice when such a story is no longer a yellow flag. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on July 05, 2023, 09:17:02 AM
Doctors reflect on race, schools three years into Covid-19 (https://missionlocal.org/2023/06/docs-reflect-on-race-schools-three-years-into-covid-19/)

Quote from: Annika HomDr. Carlos del Rio, interim dean at Emory University School of Medicine, said public health experts didn't foresee the effect of learning loss and isolationism on students. That impact could be the most long-lasting, UCSF professor of medicine Dr. Mark Smith said.

"We made a mistake with schools," del Rio said. "I hope we don't make it again."

Oops.  I guess.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on July 14, 2023, 11:30:31 AM
Covid hasn't entirely gone away—here's where we stand (https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/07/07/1075979/covid-hasnt-entirely-gone-away-heres-where-we-stand/?utm_campaign=site_visitor.unpaid.engagement&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=tr_social&twclid=2-6o0gcjyqvl4mftjm62j8mtjrz)
The coronavirus continues to cause infections, disease and death—and long covid. (https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/07/07/1075979/covid-hasnt-entirely-gone-away-heres-where-we-stand/?utm_campaign=site_visitor.unpaid.engagement&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=tr_social&twclid=2-6o0gcjyqvl4mftjm62j8mtjrz)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 07, 2023, 04:28:32 PM
CDC says COVID variant EG.5 is now dominant, including strain some call "Eris"
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on August 07, 2023, 09:41:17 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on August 07, 2023, 04:28:32 PMCDC says COVID variant EG.5 is now dominant, including strain some call "Eris"

COVID is back.... A colleague and her husband, both fully vaccinated, fell ill when travelling through Spain. They were both quite ill with high fever and classic symptoms (loss of taste etc.) - up to the point were they considered checking into a hospital, but they recovered.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 08, 2023, 08:37:26 AM
Quote from: Que on August 07, 2023, 09:41:17 PMCOVID is back.... A colleague and her husband, both fully vaccinated, fell ill when travelling through Spain. They were both quite ill with high fever and classic symptoms (loss of taste etc.) - up to the point were they considered checking into a hospital, but they recovered.
Greatly relieved that they've recovered!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on August 08, 2023, 12:49:44 PM
A new clue to the reason some people come down with long COVID

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/08/08/1192496578/a-new-clue-to-the-reason-some-people-come-down-with-long-covid?utm_medium=social&utm_source=threads.net&utm_term=nprnews&utm_campaign=npr
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 05, 2023, 01:01:48 PM
Conclusion: Prob. no great worry.

New study led by Boston scientists finds latest COVID-19 variant is less of a threat than feared

The BA.2.86 subvariant had captured the world's attention because it carries over 30 mutations in its spike protein.

By Jessica Bartlett Globe Staff, Updated September 5, 2023,
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on September 07, 2023, 12:22:23 AM
It seems a large number of mutations doesn't necessarily lead to a more dangerous variant. But it does seem to circumvent preexisting resistance by previous episodes or vaccines - currently there is a increasing number of cases in my social and work circle.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 07, 2023, 09:48:34 AM
Quote from: Que on September 07, 2023, 12:22:23 AMIt seems a large number of mutations doesn't necessarily lead to a more dangerous variant. But it does seem to circumvent preexisting resistance by previous episodes or vaccines - currently there is a increasing number of cases in my social and work circle.
There's been a spike here. Hospitalizations are at a five-month high in Massachusetts.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on September 10, 2023, 12:16:39 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on September 07, 2023, 09:48:34 AMThere's been a spike here. Hospitalizations are at a five-month high in Massachusetts.

Same here in San Diego County.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 10, 2023, 07:05:14 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on September 07, 2023, 09:48:34 AMThere's been a spike here. Hospitalizations are at a five-month high in Massachusetts.

Same here.  The governor here has said that he will not be instating a mask mandate despite the spike.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 10, 2023, 08:21:15 AM
Quote from: DavidW on September 10, 2023, 07:05:14 AMSame here.  The governor here has said that he will not be instating a mask mandate despite the spike.
I don't see a mandate here, either, but many individuals are exercising sensible caution.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on September 10, 2023, 07:48:59 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on September 10, 2023, 08:21:15 AMI don't see a mandate here, either, but many individuals are exercising sensible caution.

I don't see much caution being exercised here. In stores, I am usually the only one wearing a mask.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Wendell_E on September 11, 2023, 12:46:34 AM
Quote from: krummholz on September 10, 2023, 07:48:59 PMI don't see much caution being exercised here. In stores, I am usually the only one wearing a mask.

Same here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 11, 2023, 03:36:16 AM
GMG demography becomes more clear.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 11, 2023, 03:38:05 AM
From Science:

Rare link between coronavirus vaccines and Long Covid–like illness starts to gain acceptance

Studies probe unusual cases of neurologic complications, blood pressure swings, and other side effects (https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-link-between-coronavirus-vaccines-and-long-covid-illness-starts-gain-acceptance)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on September 11, 2023, 05:14:50 AM
Quote from: Todd on September 11, 2023, 03:38:05 AMFrom Science:

Rare link between coronavirus vaccines and Long Covid–like illness starts to gain acceptance

Studies probe unusual cases of neurologic complications, blood pressure swings, and other side effects (https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-link-between-coronavirus-vaccines-and-long-covid-illness-starts-gain-acceptance)

https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/vaccination-may-protect-against-long-covid
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 11, 2023, 05:36:33 AM
Quote from: Daverz on September 11, 2023, 05:14:50 AMhttps://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/vaccination-may-protect-against-long-covid

Vaccines may not protect against disease brought on by vaccines.  That's the important takeaway from the Science article.  It is worth remembering that Science is generally considered to be a reliable source of scientific information.  Maybe not on GMG, though.

It is also worth remembering that pharmaceutical companies were granted liability protection for vaccines they developed and produced, including the ones already pulled from use - eg, the once much-lauded Moderna vaccine.  Hopefully, liability protection was sound policy making.  I'm sure it was.  How could it be otherwise?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2023, 05:55:54 AM
Last I read, they are hoping to have a vaccine for the new variant(s?) available for the public by mid-September.  Anyone hear any updates?

I checked for Covid cases data numbers for my state and was quite shocked.  I hadn't checked for a number of months so was quite surprised by how much they had risen.  :(

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on September 11, 2023, 06:14:07 AM
Taking an important quote from the article:

QuoteOthers find the study compelling. "Even last year I was a little bit cautious" about the link between POTS and vaccination, says Tae Chung, a neuromuscular physiatrist who runs the POTS clinic at Johns Hopkins University. "I didn't have quantitative data to back it up, but now I feel like I do." Still, Chung stresses that this paper and other data also suggest COVID-19 vaccines protect against POTS and other Long Covid symptoms, and he remains a strong advocate for vaccination.

AN IMMUNE OVERREACTION to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which COVID-19 vaccines use to induce protective antibodies, is one possible cause of these symptoms. One theory is that after vaccination some people generate another round of antibodies targeting the first. Those antibodies could function somewhat like spike itself: Spike targets a cell surface protein called the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, enabling the virus to enter cells. The rogue antibodies might also bind to ACE2, which helps regulate blood pressure and heart rate, says Bernhard Schieffer, a cardiologist at the University of Marburg. If those antibodies disrupt ACE2 signaling, that could cause the racing heart rates and blood pressure swings seen in POTS.

It is important to note that while there is now an established link in some cases between a rare form of long covid and vaccines, this doesn't by a long shot make anti-vaxxers right.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on September 11, 2023, 08:26:30 AM
Quote from: Todd on September 11, 2023, 05:36:33 AMVaccines may not protect against disease brought on by vaccines.  That's the important takeaway from the Science article.  It is worth remembering that Science is generally considered to be a reliable source of scientific information.  Maybe not on GMG, though.

It is also worth remembering that pharmaceutical companies were granted liability protection for vaccines they developed and produced, including the ones already pulled from use - eg, the once much-lauded Moderna vaccine.  Hopefully, liability protection was sound policy making.  I'm sure it was.  How could it be otherwise?

Now you're promoting anti-vax conspiracy theories? The emergency approval for the original Moderna (and Pfizer) vaccines were withdrawn when they were replaced by dual target vaccines.

The important takeaway from the Science article is "rare." Of course any vaccine will have unexpected side effects. It would be insane to get a vaccine for a disease that isn't a grave threat. Covid-19 qualifies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on September 11, 2023, 08:53:03 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 11, 2023, 08:26:30 AMNow you're promoting anti-vax conspiracy theories?

No.


Quote from: Spotted Horses on September 11, 2023, 08:26:30 AMThe important takeaway from the Science article is "rare."

The word "rare" is important to be sure, but there are other important aspects of the article. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 11, 2023, 12:56:18 PM
https://247wallst.com/special-report/2023/09/06/heres-how-bad-covid-is-right-now-in-every-state/
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 11, 2023, 01:00:37 PM
FDA approves updated COVID vaccines to boost protection this fall
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on September 11, 2023, 04:34:31 PM
Quote from: Todd on September 11, 2023, 03:36:16 AMGMG demography becomes more clear.

What the heck does this mean?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2023, 05:32:41 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2023, 05:55:54 AMLast I read, they are hoping to have a vaccine for the new variant(s?) available for the public by mid-September.  Anyone hear any updates?

I checked for Covid cases data numbers for my state and was quite shocked.  I hadn't checked for a number of months so was quite surprised by how much they had risen.  :(

PD
Quote from: Karl Henning on September 11, 2023, 01:00:37 PMFDA approves updated COVID vaccines to boost protection this fall
Any info re my earlier question Karl?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on September 11, 2023, 05:51:41 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2023, 05:32:41 PMAny info re my earlier question Karl?

PD

QuoteThere's still another step: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must sign off. A CDC advisory panel is set to issue recommendations Tuesday on who most needs the updated shots. Vaccinations could begin later this week, and both the COVID-19 and flu shot can be given at the same visit.

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on September 11, 2023, 05:56:02 PM
Who all (if we know) seems to have the best vaccines (or too early to tell if there are thought to be any differences?) and is/are they a one-shot vaccine?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 01, 2024, 01:49:28 PM
PROVIDENCE — As the year draws to a close, coronavirus concentrations in Rhode Island's wastewater are surging, according to the most recent federal data.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses the National Wastewater Surveillance System as an "early warning" system that allows communities to act to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

And in Rhode Island, the warning is now clear: From Dec. 3 to Dec. 17, three wastewater treatment plants in Rhode Island had coronavirus levels at 80 to 100 percent of the highest levels detected at those sites, and five other treatment plants had 60 to 79 percent of past levels. Two other testing sites are new, so they have no comparative data.

"It's telling us that COVID has not left us," said Dr. Pablo Rodriguez, a public health advocate and host of "Nuestra Salud" on Latina 100.3 FM. "It's still with us, and the new variants are definitely creating a spike in new infections."

The coronavirus is spreading more than many people realize, he said. These days, fewer people are getting tested and those who do often take the tests at home and don't share the results with the Department of Health, he said.

"So at this point, the best measure is to watch the wastewater," Rodriguez said. "Hospital admissions are the next shoe to drop."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/12/27/metro/coronavirus-levels-rising-ri-waste-water/?p1=BGSearch_Advanced_Results

Two of my choir members came down with COVID over the week and a half before Christmas.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 02, 2024, 04:26:10 AM
Covid vaccine rates in the U.S. are slumping — and it will be a challenge to boost them (https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/us-covid-shot-rates-are-low-and-it-will-be-a-challenge-to-boost-them.html)

Quote from: Annika Kim ConstantinoOnly 15.7% of U.S. adults had received the newest Covid shots from Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax as of Nov. 18, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those jabs, some of which won approval in mid-September, are designed to target the omicron subvariant XBB.1.5.

CNBC is, of course, a business news outlet.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 02, 2024, 05:48:23 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on January 01, 2024, 01:49:28 PMPROVIDENCE — As the year draws to a close, coronavirus concentrations in Rhode Island's wastewater are surging, according to the most recent federal data.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses the National Wastewater Surveillance System as an "early warning" system that allows communities to act to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

And in Rhode Island, the warning is now clear: From Dec. 3 to Dec. 17, three wastewater treatment plants in Rhode Island had coronavirus levels at 80 to 100 percent of the highest levels detected at those sites, and five other treatment plants had 60 to 79 percent of past levels. Two other testing sites are new, so they have no comparative data.

"It's telling us that COVID has not left us," said Dr. Pablo Rodriguez, a public health advocate and host of "Nuestra Salud" on Latina 100.3 FM. "It's still with us, and the new variants are definitely creating a spike in new infections."

The coronavirus is spreading more than many people realize, he said. These days, fewer people are getting tested and those who do often take the tests at home and don't share the results with the Department of Health, he said.

"So at this point, the best measure is to watch the wastewater," Rodriguez said. "Hospital admissions are the next shoe to drop."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/12/27/metro/coronavirus-levels-rising-ri-waste-water/?p1=BGSearch_Advanced_Results

Two of my choir members came down with COVID over the week and a half before Christmas.

Indeed, several neighbors recently contracted COVID for the second time. There is a lot of it going around, and I would not enter a crowded public space without a mask. I had the latest vaccine back in October, but it's well-known that even someone who is up to date on vaccines can contract the infection, and can even get seriously ill or have Long Covid as a complication.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 05:54:54 AM
Quote from: Todd on January 02, 2024, 04:26:10 AMCovid vaccine rates in the U.S. are slumping — and it will be a challenge to boost them (https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/us-covid-shot-rates-are-low-and-it-will-be-a-challenge-to-boost-them.html)

CNBC is, of course, a business news outlet.
Quote from: Karl Henning on January 01, 2024, 01:49:28 PMPROVIDENCE — As the year draws to a close, coronavirus concentrations in Rhode Island's wastewater are surging, according to the most recent federal data.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses the National Wastewater Surveillance System as an "early warning" system that allows communities to act to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

And in Rhode Island, the warning is now clear: From Dec. 3 to Dec. 17, three wastewater treatment plants in Rhode Island had coronavirus levels at 80 to 100 percent of the highest levels detected at those sites, and five other treatment plants had 60 to 79 percent of past levels. Two other testing sites are new, so they have no comparative data.

"It's telling us that COVID has not left us," said Dr. Pablo Rodriguez, a public health advocate and host of "Nuestra Salud" on Latina 100.3 FM. "It's still with us, and the new variants are definitely creating a spike in new infections."

The coronavirus is spreading more than many people realize, he said. These days, fewer people are getting tested and those who do often take the tests at home and don't share the results with the Department of Health, he said.

"So at this point, the best measure is to watch the wastewater," Rodriguez said. "Hospital admissions are the next shoe to drop."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/12/27/metro/coronavirus-levels-rising-ri-waste-water/?p1=BGSearch_Advanced_Results

Two of my choir members came down with COVID over the week and a half before Christmas.
How bad were their symptoms Karl and how are they feeling now?  A friend of a friend of mine who works in the health industry ended up getting Covid just before Christmas.  She was scheduled to fly out to visit family members for a long holiday/vacation and had to postpone it by about a week (until she tested negative).  My guess is that she is somewhere in her 60's (and in very good health/shape).  From what I recall, she said that she was feeling awful for about four days...and also, obviously, was very sad that she couldn't leave when she had planned to.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 05:57:21 AM
Quote from: krummholz on January 02, 2024, 05:48:23 AMIndeed, several neighbors recently contracted COVID for the second time. There is a lot of it going around, and I would not enter a crowded public space without a mask. I had the latest vaccine back in October, but it's well-known that even someone who is up to date on vaccines can contract the infection, and can even get seriously ill or have Long Covid as a complication.
That's probably a smart idea.  Do you regularly wear one when shopping?  Or are you thinking more in terms of things like public transport?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 02, 2024, 09:09:26 AM
Quote from: krummholz on January 02, 2024, 05:48:23 AMIndeed, several neighbors recently contracted COVID for the second time. There is a lot of it going around, and I would not enter a crowded public space without a mask. I had the latest vaccine back in October, but it's well-known that even someone who is up to date on vaccines can contract the infection, and can even get seriously ill or have Long Covid as a complication.
Indeed, my vaccinations were current both times the bug hit me.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 02, 2024, 09:11:32 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 05:54:54 AMHow bad were their symptoms Karl and how are they feeling now?
Mild symptoms in both cases, thankfully, and one had mended sufficiently to participate in the Lessons and Carols.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 11:40:17 AM
CVS texted me that the CDC is recommending covid vaccine boosters once again.  Once I'm completely well from the flu I guess I'll go.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 02, 2024, 11:41:32 AM
Quote from: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 11:40:17 AMCVS texted me that the CDC is recommending covid vaccine boosters once again.  Once I'm completely well from the flu I guess I'll go.
Interesting! With the "mini outbreak" in my choir, I called the doc to see where I stand, and they say I'm current.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:44:06 AM
Quote from: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 11:40:17 AMCVS texted me that the CDC is recommending covid vaccine boosters once again.  Once I'm completely well from the flu I guess I'll go.
Number one:  I'm sorry that you have the flu.  :(  How are you feeling?

Booster again?  Haven't been keeping up as much news-wise.  Is there a new booster?  I had received one, from what I recall, a bit post-Thanksgiving (I'll have to look up the date)?

PD
Quote from: Karl Henning on January 02, 2024, 11:41:32 AMInteresting! With the "mini outbreak" in my choir, I called the doc to see where I stand, and they say I'm current.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 12:05:14 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:44:06 AMNumber one:  I'm sorry that you have the flu.  :(  How are you feeling?

Just lingering congestion and a cough.  It hit me hard, but faded away quickly leaving me with just the congestion and cough.  I've been fighting it for a couple of weeks or more now.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 01:25:30 PM
Quote from: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 12:05:14 PMJust lingering congestion and a cough.  It hit me hard, but faded away quickly leaving me with just the congestion and cough.  I've been fighting it for a couple of weeks or more now.
Sounds nasty.  May I ask, did you also get the current flu shot beforehand?

Feel better,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 02:44:43 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 01:25:30 PMSounds nasty.  May I ask, did you also get the current flu shot beforehand?

Feel better,

PD

No I missed it!  But it didn't matter, all my students that got sick had that shot.  South Carolina made national news for being flu hotspot.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 02, 2024, 03:19:55 PM
Talk about the wrong way to make the news!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:06:36 PM
Quote from: DavidW on January 02, 2024, 02:44:43 PMNo I missed it!  But it didn't matter, all my students that got sick had that shot.  South Carolina made national news for being flu hotspot.
Dang!  :(

I had thought that I was up to date re Covid boosters.  Hope that you can get yours soon...I know that there are no guarantees in life, but hopefully it will help to lesson the effects should you get Covid.

I hadn't heard about South Carolina and the flu...any idea as to how your state became a hotspot?  In my state, I think that getting the flu shot is more emphasized towards older persons.  Was that part of the problem?

Best,

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:39:42 PM
The whole family came down with an upper respiratory bug that wasn't dangerous, but bad enough to be very unpleasant, and which wouldn't let go. At least two weeks of significant symptoms, terribly congested sinuses and post-nasal drip that caused ceaseless coughing. One of us took our remaining home Covid test and it was negative. We speculate it might have been RSV.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:58:01 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:39:42 PMThe whole family came down with an upper respiratory bug that wasn't dangerous, but bad enough to be very unpleasant, and which wouldn't let go. At least two weeks of significant symptoms, terribly congested sinuses and post-nasal drip that caused ceaseless coughing. One of us took our remaining home Covid test and it was negative. We speculate it might have been RSV.
Hope that you are feeling better.

Did you get the vaccine? 

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:59:59 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:58:01 PMHope that you are feeling better.

Did you get the vaccine? 

PD

Kids got it first, then the parents, took at least a month but cleared out, more-or-less.

We got vaccinated and boosted a year later for Covid-19, but haven't kept up after that.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 03, 2024, 04:07:09 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:39:42 PMThe whole family came down with an upper respiratory bug that wasn't dangerous, but bad enough to be very unpleasant, and which wouldn't let go. At least two weeks of significant symptoms, terribly congested sinuses and post-nasal drip that caused ceaseless coughing. One of us took our remaining home Covid test and it was negative. We speculate it might have been RSV.
Ugh! Hope everyone mends soon!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on January 03, 2024, 05:57:28 AM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:59:59 PMKids got it first, then the parents, took at least a month but cleared out, more-or-less.

We got vaccinated and boosted a year later for Covid-19, but haven't kept up after that.

I was thinking more in terms of a RSV vaccine.  In any event, glad that it's mostly behind you.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on January 03, 2024, 08:54:26 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 11:06:36 PMIn my state, I think that getting the flu shot is more emphasized towards older persons.  Was that part of the problem?

No South Carolina is one of the best places to retire to and we have a very large population of the elderly here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 03, 2024, 01:48:30 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on January 02, 2024, 05:57:21 AMThat's probably a smart idea.  Do you regularly wear one when shopping?  Or are you thinking more in terms of things like public transport?

PD

Oh, definitely while shopping! And if I'm going inside a restaurant to get carryout (I no longer eat at indoor sit-down restaurants). Pretty much every public space that's been frequented by more than a handful of people that day, I'll wear a mask. Definitely at work too.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on January 03, 2024, 01:53:11 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on January 02, 2024, 11:39:42 PMThe whole family came down with an upper respiratory bug that wasn't dangerous, but bad enough to be very unpleasant, and which wouldn't let go. At least two weeks of significant symptoms, terribly congested sinuses and post-nasal drip that caused ceaseless coughing. One of us took our remaining home Covid test and it was negative. We speculate it might have been RSV.

Sorry to hear that! But a single negative antigen test could be a false negative - it could still have been COVID. Or RSV. No way to know now, short of testing for antibodies.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 04:15:38 AM
From Reason: Fauci to Congress: 6-Foot Social Distancing Guidance Likely Not Based on Data (//http://Fauci%20to%20Congress:%206-Foot%20Social%20Distancing%20Guidance%20Likely%20Not%20Based%20on%20Data)


Quote from: Christian BritschgiIn closed-door congressional testimony, former chief White House medical adviser Anthony Fauci said that federal social distancing guidance during the pandemic was likely not based on any data, and conceded that the lab leak hypothesis of COVID-19's origins isn't a conspiracy theory.

Fauci's comments came during the second of two seven-hour rounds of transcribed, but non-public, testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2024, 04:47:35 AM
Well that's a nice straw man. I don't know anyone of significance who ever described the lab leak hypothesis as a conspiracy theory in the first place, so "conceded" is hardly the correct word. It's just considerably less likely than a crossover from species in the market, for a host of reasons.

Nor does the remark about the social distancing guideline mean what a lot of people will think it means. Especially readers of a libertarian publication who want to be told that they can do whatever they want without consequence.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 04:59:19 AM
From ABC News, March 2020: Sorry, conspiracy theorists. Study concludes COVID-19 'is not a laboratory construct' (https://abcnews.go.com/US/conspiracy-theorists-study-concludes-covid-19-laboratory-construct/story?id=69827832)

Memory holes run deep.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2024, 12:36:52 PM
Quote from: Todd on January 13, 2024, 04:59:19 AMFrom ABC News, March 2020: Sorry, conspiracy theorists. Study concludes COVID-19 'is not a laboratory construct' (https://abcnews.go.com/US/conspiracy-theorists-study-concludes-covid-19-laboratory-construct/story?id=69827832)

Memory holes run deep.

Especially for people who can't remember the difference between a deliberate release theory and a lab leak theory from just 2 posts earlier.

They are not the same thing. A lab leak is not about an engineered virus. A lab leak is about a lab studying a natural virus that accidentally got out.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 12:46:48 PM
The conspiracy theories about the origins of the coronavirus, debunked (https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab)

Quote from: Eliza BarclayThere are two main versions of the rumor, and they have one common thread: that the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, originated in a level 4 (the highest biosafety level) research laboratory in Wuhan.

In one version of the rumor, the virus was engineered in the lab by humans as a bioweapon. In another version, the virus was being studied in the lab (after being isolated from animals) and then "escaped" or "leaked" because of poor safety protocol.

Memory holes run deep.  So deep.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 13, 2024, 12:59:09 PM
Quote from: Todd on January 13, 2024, 04:15:38 AMFrom Reason: Fauci to Congress: 6-Foot Social Distancing Guidance Likely Not Based on Data (//http://Fauci%20to%20Congress:%206-Foot%20Social%20Distancing%20Guidance%20Likely%20Not%20Based%20on%20Data)



That link doesn't lead anywhere. And the quote suggests that we can't check Fauci's actual words to see if he's being misrepresented there.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 01:02:47 PM
From the Wall Street Journal: Anthony Fauci Fesses Up (https://www.wsj.com/articles/anthony-fauci-covid-social-distancing-six-feet-rule-house-subcommittee-hearing-44289850)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 13, 2024, 01:07:53 PM
Quote from: Todd on January 13, 2024, 01:02:47 PMFrom the Wall Street Journal: Anthony Fauci Fesses Up (https://www.wsj.com/articles/anthony-fauci-covid-social-distancing-six-feet-rule-house-subcommittee-hearing-44289850)

Can't read that without a subscription.

But from the opening paragraph:

"That's one of the admissions that Members of Congress say the former National Institutes of Health potentate made this week in two days of closed-door testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic."

Now which members of congress might they be? Does the article go on to say? Are you to take this on faith without knowing if Fauci is being quoted reliably and impartially?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 01:16:03 PM
From the Boston Globe, almost a year ago: 'We may not ever know': Fauci says origin of coronavirus could remain a mystery (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/02/27/metro/fauci-calls-an-open-mind-lab-leak-theory-sees-no-data-back-it/)

Memory holes are unfathomably deep.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on January 13, 2024, 01:23:55 PM
Another article without a paywall: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/fauci-admits-social-distancing-guidelines-sort-of-just-appeared-in-two-day-congressional-testimony/ar-AA1mLxOP (https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/fauci-admits-social-distancing-guidelines-sort-of-just-appeared-in-two-day-congressional-testimony/ar-AA1mLxOP)

I'm not actually that surprised because once it became known that it was air borne, six feet was actually too low and masks became even more important (not like they ever were not).  Social distancing was a good starting point though, especially when the future of mass adoption and availability of PPE wasn't known well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on January 13, 2024, 01:29:29 PM
Quote from: DavidW on January 13, 2024, 01:23:55 PMI'm not actually that surprised because once it became known that it was air borne, six feet was actually too low and masks became even more important (not like they ever were not).  Social distancing was a good starting point though, especially when the future of mass adoption and availability of PPE wasn't known well.

Scott Gottlieb stated publicly that both the final six-foot and original ten-foot rules were arbitrary and not scientifically determined.  He did so in 2021.  Multiple sources later reported that the ten-foot distance was reduced per pressure from business interests. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: SimonNZ on January 13, 2024, 01:41:39 PM
Quote from: DavidW on January 13, 2024, 01:23:55 PMAnother article without a paywall: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/fauci-admits-social-distancing-guidelines-sort-of-just-appeared-in-two-day-congressional-testimony/ar-AA1mLxOP (https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/fauci-admits-social-distancing-guidelines-sort-of-just-appeared-in-two-day-congressional-testimony/ar-AA1mLxOP)



 from that:

""It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America's response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data."

Now that is the very deep Memory Hole. Where was the non-scientific response coming from, can anyone remember?

and couldnt help bumping on this bit of journalism:

"During the last seven hours of the transcribed interview on Tuesday, Fauci testified that the lab-leak hypothesis, which he tried to disprove with the March 2020 "Proximal Origin" scientific paper, was not a conspiracy theory after all. While conceding the possibility that the coronavirus originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, he did appear to play semantics with the definition of a "lab leak" to defend the biased conclusions of Nature Medicine's "Proximal Origin" publication."
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 13, 2024, 03:08:00 PM
Quote from: Todd on January 13, 2024, 01:16:03 PMMemory holes are unfathomably deep.

I remember all of the reasons I blocked you.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 13, 2024, 03:37:26 PM
Quote from: Madiel on January 13, 2024, 03:08:00 PMI remember all of the reasons I blocked you.
They're solid reasons.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on January 29, 2024, 09:28:03 AM

     Tomorrow I go to the pharmacy to get the latest Rona vaccine plus the influenza shot appropriate for my advanced age. My left arm tingles with anticipation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on January 29, 2024, 02:22:06 PM
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is still evolving rapidly. The current variant, JN. 1, appeared only in September. Fortunately, hospital admissions have not skyrocketed; the most recent booster vaccine continues to protect against hospitalization and severe illness. Still, only 21 percent of adults older than 18 years in the United States are vaccinated with the updated booster. More should get it.

Covid is back, and the U.S. is unprepared for the next bug. Here's what to do. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/23/covid-pandemic-lessons-disease-x/)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on January 29, 2024, 02:56:35 PM
21 per cent doesn't sound good. Though I'm not sure what the figure is here, certainly booster rates are lower than the initial vaccinations (and I've held off myself on the latest because of timing issues).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: drogulus on January 30, 2024, 07:52:11 AM
    I returned from my vaxcation and not even ow.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 17, 2024, 05:38:49 AM
From the Gray Lady:

Covid Shots for Children

Much of the world has decided that most young children don't need to receive Covid booster shots. The U.S. is an outlier. (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/13/briefing/covid-boosters-children-cdc.html)

Trust the science, etc.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 17, 2024, 03:55:47 PM
You don't understand how science works.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 17, 2024, 06:05:35 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on January 29, 2024, 02:22:06 PMThe SARS-CoV-2 virus is still evolving rapidly. The current variant, JN. 1, appeared only in September. Fortunately, hospital admissions have not skyrocketed; the most recent booster vaccine continues to protect against hospitalization and severe illness. Still, only 21 percent of adults older than 18 years in the United States are vaccinated with the updated booster. More should get it.

Covid is back, and the U.S. is unprepared for the next bug. Here's what to do. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/23/covid-pandemic-lessons-disease-x/)

I'm inclined to agree, because (though it's just anecdotal), a lot of people have been getting Covid around here.

But I don't like vaccine availability. I've gotten 5 Covid shots, all Pfizer, last one March or April 2023, minimal side effects apart from sore arm.
But I can't find Pfizer. There's just Moderna (which gave bad side effects to some family members and acquaintances) or Novavax (about which I know nothing).

I had the 2 shingles shots last year and each installment had serious side effects, so I would rather stick with the Covid shot I've had decent experience with.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 17, 2024, 06:23:04 PM
Quote from: T. D. on February 17, 2024, 06:05:35 PMI'm inclined to agree, because (though it's just anecdotal), a lot of people have been getting Covid around here.

But I don't like vaccine availability. I've gotten 5 Covid shots, all Pfizer, last one March or April 2023, minimal side effects apart from sore arm.
But I can't find Pfizer. There's just Moderna (which gave bad side effects to some family members and acquaintances) or Novavax (about which I know nothing).

I had the 2 shingles shots last year and each installment had serious side effects, so I would rather stick with the Covid shot I've had decent experience with.
Good luck and good hunting!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on February 17, 2024, 08:21:15 PM
Quote from: Todd on February 17, 2024, 05:38:49 AMFrom the Gray Lady:

Covid Shots for Children

Much of the world has decided that most young children don't need to receive Covid booster shots. The U.S. is an outlier. (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/13/briefing/covid-boosters-children-cdc.html)

Trust the science, etc.

As you quoted elsewhere, "Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality."

"Science" for me means physics, chemistry, biochemistry in the sense of understanding how living cells actually work. The word "Decided" reveals a lesser degree of certainty.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on February 18, 2024, 04:24:52 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on February 17, 2024, 08:21:15 PMAs you quoted elsewhere, "Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality."

I did?  And then I posted my last post in this thread?  Hmmm, what's the connection?
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Wendell_E on February 18, 2024, 06:27:55 AM
Quote from: T. D. on February 17, 2024, 06:05:35 PMI'm inclined to agree, because (though it's just anecdotal), a lot of people have been getting Covid around here.

But I don't like vaccine availability. I've gotten 5 Covid shots, all Pfizer, last one March or April 2023, minimal side effects apart from sore arm.
But I can't find Pfizer. There's just Moderna (which gave bad side effects to some family members and acquaintances) or Novavax (about which I know nothing).

I had the 2 shingles shots last year and each installment had serious side effects, so I would rather stick with the Covid shot I've had decent experience with.

I had some fairly mild effects from my 1st shingles shot, nothing from the 2nd.

A week or so ago, I got the new COVID vaccine (Pfizer) and the RSV on the same day. I had a mild fever the next day (100.5°F), but was back to normal the next morning.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 18, 2024, 09:02:28 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on February 17, 2024, 08:21:15 PMAs you quoted elsewhere, "Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality."

"Science" for me means physics, chemistry, biochemistry in the sense of understanding how living cells actually work. The word "Decided" reveals a lesser degree of certainty.

There is a difference between a scientist and a policy maker.  I don't expect everyone on the forum to understand, but I'm glad to see that you do and are trying to educate others. :)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 18, 2024, 09:33:43 AM
Quote from: DavidW on February 18, 2024, 09:02:28 AMThere is a difference between a scientist and a policy maker. 
Forsooth!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on February 18, 2024, 01:38:06 PM
Quote from: DavidW on February 18, 2024, 09:02:28 AMThere is a difference between a scientist and a policy maker.  I don't expect everyone on the forum to understand, but I'm glad to see that you do and are trying to educate others. :)

Education also requires a desire to learn.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 19, 2024, 04:10:54 PM
Quote from: Wendell_E on February 18, 2024, 06:27:55 AMI had some fairly mild effects from my 1st shingles shot, nothing from the 2nd.

A week or so ago, I got the new COVID vaccine (Pfizer) and the RSV on the same day. I had a mild fever the next day (100.5°F), but was back to normal the next morning.

I think I found the new Pfizer Covid vaccine...just have to drive to a CVS (ugh) chain drugstore about 50 minutes away.

My shingles vaccine side effects were unpleasant but not truly bad. First one I felt low-level rotten for several days. Second one I was incapacitated for about 36 hours, fever and aches. Fever was a bit over 101, which hits me hard because my "normal" temp is just over 97.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 19, 2024, 06:38:38 PM
Until last fall, Shingrix was the only vaccine that had ever given me a "robust systemic reaction", i.e. chills, fever, myalgias, basically feeling like I was coming down with the flu. And it came on while I was on a hike, to add to my misery.

Then this fall I had the RSV vaccine and the "adjuvanted" high-dose flu vaccine together. Gave me much the same reaction as the Shingrix, plus it aggravated a rotator cuff issue I've had for a few years.

The reason was the pharmacy technician jabbed the needle not into the lower deltoid as I had asked, but almost into the rotator cuff itself. This was my second vaccine injury at the hands of CVS. I will NEVER AGAIN go to them for a vaccination.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on February 20, 2024, 06:11:56 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 19, 2024, 06:38:38 PMUntil last fall, Shingrix was the only vaccine that had ever given me a "robust systemic reaction", i.e. chills, fever, myalgias, basically feeling like I was coming down with the flu. And it came on while I was on a hike, to add to my misery.

Then this fall I had the RSV vaccine and the "adjuvanted" high-dose flu vaccine together. Gave me much the same reaction as the Shingrix, plus it aggravated a rotator cuff issue I've had for a few years.

I had the flu shot, Shingrix, and a TDAP (tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis) booster at the same time and spent a few hours in bed with cold sweats the next day.  Very much worth it as shingles sounds like something you really do not want. I didn't have any problems with the RSV or second Shingrix shots (or with any the Covid shots, all Pfizer).   
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 06:28:23 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 19, 2024, 06:38:38 PMUntil last fall, Shingrix was the only vaccine that had ever given me a "robust systemic reaction", i.e. chills, fever, myalgias, basically feeling like I was coming down with the flu. And it came on while I was on a hike, to add to my misery.

Then this fall I had the RSV vaccine and the "adjuvanted" high-dose flu vaccine together. Gave me much the same reaction as the Shingrix, plus it aggravated a rotator cuff issue I've had for a few years.

The reason was the pharmacy technician jabbed the needle not into the lower deltoid as I had asked, but almost into the rotator cuff itself. This was my second vaccine injury at the hands of CVS. I will NEVER AGAIN go to them for a vaccination.
Yikes!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 20, 2024, 07:23:26 AM
I haven't had any vaccines at CVS. My local outlet is too grimy and the employees too dopey.
The CVS outlet with Pfizer is in a bigger town, so I may chance it.
I'll get the flu shots elsewhere, as there are alternatives I trust more.

I've had shingles before, though a mild case. My brother and some semi-neighbors have had bad cases. Shingles is definitely something to avoid. Vaccine hit me hard, but it's better than the ailment.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 09:46:34 AM
I've tested negative for Strep, Flu and 'Vid, and apparently suffering from the "none of the above" virus. When I try to speak (which I don't anymore) I rather suspect laryngitis. Rather a Blah week.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 20, 2024, 10:25:45 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 09:46:34 AMI've tested negative for Strep, Flu and 'Vid, and apparently suffering from the "none of the above" virus. When I try to speak (which I don't anymore) I rather suspect laryngitis. Rather a Blah week.
Hope that you feel better soon.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 20, 2024, 10:28:04 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 09:46:34 AMI've tested negative for Strep, Flu and 'Vid, and apparently suffering from the "none of the above" virus. When I try to speak (which I don't anymore) I rather suspect laryngitis. Rather a Blah week.

Sounds very much like what I've had for the last week. Only tested for Covid (twice negative), but the main symptom is laryngitis - bad laryngitis. Definitely NOT something a teacher needs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: VonStupp on February 20, 2024, 10:35:48 AM
Quote from: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 09:46:34 AMI've tested negative for Strep, Flu and 'Vid, and apparently suffering from the "none of the above" virus. When I try to speak (which I don't anymore) I rather suspect laryngitis. Rather a Blah week.
Speedy recovery!
It seems there is so much icky stuff swirling around families right now. I have students who are out for a week at a time with various maladies, and me muddling through this laryngitis-sinus-cold-whatever it is, which is quite annoying.
VS
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 10:49:10 AM
Quote from: krummholz on February 20, 2024, 10:28:04 AMDefinitely NOT something a teacher needs.
Nor a choir director. Mend quickly!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 20, 2024, 11:17:16 AM
Could it be RSV?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 11:31:53 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 20, 2024, 11:17:16 AMCould it be RSV?

PD
Don't think so; when the mrdic checked my lungs, I was told they sounded "perfect." and my Oxygen level was 97%
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on February 20, 2024, 12:59:09 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 11:31:53 AMDon't think so; when the mrdic checked my lungs, I was told they sounded "perfect." and my Oxygen level was 97%

RSV can cause upper respiratory infections, which would not involves the lungs. It can cause lower respiratory tract infections as well.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 01:03:17 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on February 20, 2024, 12:59:09 PMRSV can cause upper respiratory infections, which would not involves the lungs. It can cause lower respiratory tract infections as well.
Thanks for the corrective.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Daverz on February 20, 2024, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: T. D. on February 20, 2024, 07:23:26 AMI haven't had any vaccines at CVS. My local outlet is too grimy and the employees too dopey.

Gotta be better than Rite Aid.  I only go there because it's closer to me, but the pharmacy employees always seem so unhappy.  Given how willing they are to rip off their customers, I can imagine how badly they treat the employees.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 20, 2024, 02:27:05 PM
Quote from: Daverz on February 20, 2024, 01:31:42 PMGotta be better than Rite Aid.  I only go there because it's closer to me, but the pharmacy employees always seem so unhappy.  Given how willing they are to rip off their customers, I can imagine how badly they treat the employees.
Several months ago, I remember hearing about strikes at some stores; googling a bit further, it seems that some pharmacists at both Walgreens and CVS went on strike.  I feel for them.  At the store that I often use, there is one (sometimes two) people working in the pharmacy (only one pharmacist at a time).  So much of the service is now automated (as in refills), but it can be hard to get ahold of a pharmacist at times if you need to ask questions.

And, yes, as one article described it, certain shampoos are being "held hostage" as in a locked enclosure and you need to patiently wait for a sales person (who often is struggling to balance customers in line waiting to pay for items to be free to unlock them or try and check on something for you if you call in with a question) so that you can purchase them.

PD

p.s.  Back in the early days of Covid, I ended up getting my shots at a local Walmart.  The pharmacist there was very polite, nice and capable.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on February 20, 2024, 03:09:31 PM
I get all my vaccines at cvs.  No problem here.  They have a special privacy booth, and everything goes smoothly.

Also I had no problems asking a pharmacist about issues with a prescription.  They took the time to do some research and think about it before providing me with an indepth answer.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: T. D. on February 20, 2024, 05:46:37 PM
Quote from: Daverz on February 20, 2024, 01:31:42 PMGotta be better than Rite Aid.  I only go there because it's closer to me, but the pharmacy employees always seem so unhappy.  Given how willing they are to rip off their customers, I can imagine how badly they treat the employees.

While I dislike CVS, my big problem is that I live in a rural area and the closest CVS to me is really sad on all counts. The next nearest one is better, but 50 minutes away, less convenient (I go there about once a week and just found out they have Pfizer). I agree that Rite Aid s**ks, and it must be even worse now that the corporate parent is bankrupt.

My preferred vaccine giver has been a small independent pharmacy, also about 50 minutes away (in the same town as the nearest CVS with Pfizer), but such outlets have been hosed in favor of corporate chains and he's shut out from the latest Pfizer.

So it's gotta be CVS.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: krummholz on February 21, 2024, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on February 20, 2024, 10:49:10 AMNor a choir director. Mend quickly!

You as well!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on February 21, 2024, 12:29:58 PM
Quote from: krummholz on February 21, 2024, 12:25:47 PMYou as well!
Thanks!
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on February 23, 2024, 04:56:08 AM
Norovirus appears to be in vogue here at the moment; my wife and I are just recovering from it :( .
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on February 23, 2024, 06:18:13 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on February 23, 2024, 04:56:08 AMNorovirus appears to be in vogue here at the moment; my wife and I are just recovering from it :( .
Looking at a description of the symptoms, it does not sound at all fun!  Hope that it came and went quickly.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on February 23, 2024, 06:24:35 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on February 23, 2024, 06:18:13 AMLooking at a description of the symptoms, it does not sound at all fun!  Hope that it came and went quickly.

PD

Thanks PD, it was only really bad for one night.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 24, 2024, 09:41:02 AM
From the Hindustan Times: 'Blood on its hands': FDA loses battle against ivermectin, agrees to remove COVID-related anti-drug social media posts (https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/blood-on-its-hands-fda-loses-battle-against-ivermectin-agrees-to-remove-covid-related-anti-drug-social-media-posts-101711273717515.html)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 09:52:32 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 24, 2024, 09:41:02 AMFrom the Hindustan Times: 'Blood on its hands': FDA loses battle against ivermectin, agrees to remove COVID-related anti-drug social media posts (https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/blood-on-its-hands-fda-loses-battle-against-ivermectin-agrees-to-remove-covid-related-anti-drug-social-media-posts-101711273717515.html)

For context the FDA was not fighting against people taking human grade ivermectin.  They were trying to fight against idiots taking animal grade ivermectin as snake oil due to fake news and rumor suggesting that it cures covid19 or at least helps with the symptoms.  It does not in either case no matter what Joe Rogan says.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 (https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19)

Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 24, 2024, 10:01:04 AM
(https://www.dailyleader.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2021/08/FDA-ivermectin.jpg)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 10:44:34 AM
Yes that was exactly what I was providing the context to. ::)

The link I provided explained the difference between the two types of ivermectin, and when it is appropriate to use ivermectin if you're up for the challenge of reading a few paragraphs.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2024, 11:33:52 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 10:44:34 AMif you're up for the challenge of reading a few paragraphs.

(* chortle *)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 24, 2024, 11:40:24 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 10:44:34 AMYes that was exactly what I was providing the context to. ::)

The link I provided explained the difference between the two types of ivermectin, and when it is appropriate to use ivermectin if you're up for the challenge of reading a few paragraphs.

The fact is that the FDA agreed to remove its social media content relating to the product.  That is an unusual action on the part of the FDA.  The tweet was posted to demonstrate the unprofessional behavior of a government agency in the midst of a crisis.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 12:26:48 PM
Speaking of actually reading paragraphs, in a piece of colossal irony the Hindustan Times gives a piece of medical advice in reporting how terrible it supposedly is for anyone other than a doctor to give medical advice.

QuoteIn cases of humans, the drug is recommended to treat parasitic infections such as river blindness disease, thread worm infestation, tropical eosinophilia, round worm infestation, whipworm infestation, filariasis (also called elephantiasis), and loiasis.

Now is this okay? I can think of one reason why it would be okay for the Hindustan Times to do it but not the FDA. It would be okay because people in America listen to the FDA but nobody in America really listens to the Hindustan Times.  ::)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 24, 2024, 12:54:10 PM
My late sister, who was (God rest her) addicted to the right-wing disinformation drip, was taking Ivermectin in the belief that it would shield her from COVID. I never learnt if she had been taking the animal or human grade. I don't see her getting her doctor to prescribe the proper Iv'tin, but, hey, maybe. She had enough other medical issues that I don't know enough to suppose whether this snake oil contributed to her untimely demise.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 01:20:13 PM
How anyone ever thought that the same drug that's effective against worms is also effective against a virus is a bit beyond me. But then, people constantly want antibiotics for viruses too. And far too many doctors PRESCRIBE antibiotics for viruses. Far be it from me to believe that a basic knowledge of how disease causing organisms are classified should form part of medicine. That was just part of my biology major.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 24, 2024, 01:45:21 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 01:20:13 PMHow anyone ever thought that the same drug that's effective against worms is also effective against a virus is a bit beyond me. But then, people constantly want antibiotics for viruses too. And far too many doctors PRESCRIBE antibiotics for viruses. Far be it from me to believe that a basic knowledge of how disease causing organisms are classified should form part of medicine. That was just part of my biology major.
Madiel, how did you go from a major in biology to becoming a lawyer (if I'm remembering correctly)?  Or does your current job have something to do with legal medical issues/lawsuits?

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 02:29:02 PM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 24, 2024, 01:45:21 PMMadiel, how did you go from a major in biology to becoming a lawyer (if I'm remembering correctly)?  Or does your current job have something to do with legal medical issues/lawsuits?

PD

My university allowed you to do 2 degrees at once. I don't know how common that is elsewhere but I was doing Science and Law at the same time. Eventually Law won when I tried to do honours in biochemistry and realised I hated lab work.

The science does come in handy sometimes both in a previous job and the current one drafting legislation.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:21:38 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 24, 2024, 11:40:24 AMThe fact is that the FDA agreed to remove its social media content relating to the product.  That is an unusual action on the part of the FDA.  The tweet was posted to demonstrate the unprofessional behavior of a government agency in the midst of a crisis.

No it is not.  Facetious.  You know that settling matter out of court has nothing to do with anything but a cold calculus of cost.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 24, 2024, 03:31:32 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:21:38 PMYou know that settling matter out of court has nothing to do with anything but a cold calculus of cost.

Cost is not an issue for the federal government.  Nor is time.  The federal government has unlimited resources.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:32:24 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 24, 2024, 11:40:24 AMThe fact is that the FDA agreed to remove its social media content relating to the product.  That is an unusual action on the part of the FDA.  The tweet was posted to demonstrate the unprofessional behavior of a government agency in the midst of a crisis.

I would also like to ask you a question.  You provide intelligent reviews on music recordings.  You also become angry when people buy into audiophile snake oil.

However, you also support complete nonsense just because it aligns with your political views.  You're smart right?  What IN THE HELL does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  Why EVER would you support taking snake oil to treat an illness that has nothing to do with it??  I have a feeling that if it was Biden instead promoting this de-wormer you would be strongly opposed to it.

Not only that, but I bet you have NEVER taken ivermectin.  And even if you got covid you wouldn't take it.  Is grandstanding for your party more important than saving people from illness?

I'm frequently apolitical, and I have to say some of these issues MAKE ZERO SENSE.  Why does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  It has nothing to do with it AT ALL!  And yet this is one of many issues that people just without thinking at all jump behind.  I mean it is not all conservative nonsense, there are plenty of liberal talking points have nothing to do with the ideals of the democratic party... but still seriously please tell me how this has anything to do with your world view?  I honestly would like to know.  Because I really don't understand.  But obviously you feel strong enough to try to use this forum as a platform for misinformation, so please tell us all.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:33:19 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 24, 2024, 03:31:32 PMCost is not an issue for the federal government.  Nor is time.  The federal government has unlimited resources.

I mean that is literally the anti-thesis of the Republican party who is always concerned about the deficit, but okay.  Just print more money. :laugh:
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 24, 2024, 03:56:01 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:32:24 PMBut obviously you feel strong enough to try to use this forum as a platform for misinformation, so please tell us all.

Please direct me to misinformation I have posted. 

In this case, you appear to believe that I agree with what was posted in the linked source. 


Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:33:19 PMI mean that is literally the anti-thesis of the Republican party who is always concerned about the deficit, but okay.  Just print more money. :laugh:

No politicians actually care about the deficit or the debt.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 24, 2024, 04:48:13 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 02:29:02 PMMy university allowed you to do 2 degrees at once. I don't know how common that is elsewhere but I was doing Science and Law at the same time. Eventually Law won when I tried to do honours in biochemistry and realised I hated lab work.

The science does come in handy sometimes both in a previous job and the current one drafting legislation.
Oh, interesting!  I didn't know/was thinking that maybe there might be some sort of interconnection. 
 
In any event, it's quite impressive...well done you!  :)

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 24, 2024, 05:01:15 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:32:24 PMI would also like to ask you a question.  You provide intelligent reviews on music recordings.  You also become angry when people buy into audiophile snake oil.

However, you also support complete nonsense just because it aligns with your political views.  You're smart right?  What IN THE HELL does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  Why EVER would you support taking snake oil to treat an illness that has nothing to do with it??  I have a feeling that if it was Biden instead promoting this de-wormer you would be strongly opposed to it.

Not only that, but I bet you have NEVER taken ivermectin.  And even if you got covid you wouldn't take it.  Is grandstanding for your party more important than saving people from illness?

I'm frequently apolitical, and I have to say some of these issues MAKE ZERO SENSE.  Why does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  It has nothing to do with it AT ALL!  And yet this is one of many issues that people just without thinking at all jump behind.  I mean it is not all conservative nonsense, there are plenty of liberal talking points have nothing to do with the ideals of the democratic party... but still seriously please tell me how this has anything to do with your world view?  I honestly would like to know.  Because I really don't understand.  But obviously you feel strong enough to try to use this forum as a platform for misinformation, so please tell us all.

The right wing determination (in certain countries) to be anti-science is indeed quite mystifying. But then, universities ARE hotbeds of left wing politics. Apparently. All those intellectuals.

I've never quite pinned it down but I assume that at some point science was responsible for telling something that advocated a policy change that someone on the right didn't want. Maybe it was climate change and saying that things couldn't carry on. I don't know for sure.

But like you I'm bewildered by the response. Climate change is a clear example where instead of a left/right debate about HOW to deal with it (government or market mechanisms), in certain countries we got one side of politics denying it was happening and thus refusing to engage in the policy debate.

It would often be quite funny if it wasn't also potentially deadly.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 24, 2024, 11:47:12 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:32:24 PMI would also like to ask you a question.  You provide intelligent reviews on music recordings.  You also become angry when people buy into audiophile snake oil.

However, you also support complete nonsense just because it aligns with your political views.

For an outsider it seems that in the US literally everything is about politics these days... Which isn't normal politics anymore.... but a straight up culture war (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war).

But we're veering into US politics now, the most toxic topic on the internet!  :o
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 01:23:03 AM
With respect, Todd has been trying to make this a proxy US politics thread ever since the actual US politics thread was shut down. And you're only noticing NOW?

It's as tiresome as it's obvious, but he's been allowed to get away with it for a very long time. And this looks almost as if we're not allowed to call him on it.

But we should. The question of why the hell Covid is treated as a political issue rather than as a scientific and medical one is a legitimate question. And here on the forum, it's a question worth putting to the ONE poster who is consistently doing that. Other people post information about disease trends or about their own encounters with the disease. Todd posts stuff about how The Government Is Wrong.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 25, 2024, 03:58:22 AM
Quote from: Que on March 24, 2024, 11:47:12 PMBut we're veering into US politics now, the most toxic topic on the internet!  :o

At the moment, the genocide in Gaza is probably more toxic. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: AnotherSpin on March 25, 2024, 04:55:05 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 24, 2024, 03:32:24 PMI would also like to ask you a question.  You provide intelligent reviews on music recordings.  You also become angry when people buy into audiophile snake oil.

However, you also support complete nonsense just because it aligns with your political views.  You're smart right?  What IN THE HELL does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  Why EVER would you support taking snake oil to treat an illness that has nothing to do with it??  I have a feeling that if it was Biden instead promoting this de-wormer you would be strongly opposed to it.

Not only that, but I bet you have NEVER taken ivermectin.  And even if you got covid you wouldn't take it.  Is grandstanding for your party more important than saving people from illness?

I'm frequently apolitical, and I have to say some of these issues MAKE ZERO SENSE.  Why does ivermectin have to do with conservative politics??  It has nothing to do with it AT ALL!  And yet this is one of many issues that people just without thinking at all jump behind.  I mean it is not all conservative nonsense, there are plenty of liberal talking points have nothing to do with the ideals of the democratic party... but still seriously please tell me how this has anything to do with your world view?  I honestly would like to know.  Because I really don't understand.  But obviously you feel strong enough to try to use this forum as a platform for misinformation, so please tell us all.

I was buying ivermectin in India for my European friends. They were very happy when they received a year's supply for the prevention and treatment of covid. Used it already with great success.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: pjme on March 25, 2024, 05:53:35 AM
Good. They are worm free now! 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 25, 2024, 06:20:42 AM
I apologize for blowing up at Todd and also dragging this thread into US politics.  A poster should think twice, but a moderator should never... I've done the literal opposite.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 07:35:49 AM
Quote from: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 01:23:03 AMThe question of why the hell Covid is treated as a political issue rather than as a scientific and medical one is a legitimate question. And here on the forum, it's a question worth putting to the ONE poster who is consistently doing that. Other people post information about disease trends or about their own encounters with the disease. Todd posts stuff about how The Government Is Wrong.

It may be the case that people suspicious of government attempts to coerce the population "for the public good" feel more comfortable with one political party than another. In any experiment it also makes good scientific sense to have a control group.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2024, 07:42:19 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 25, 2024, 06:20:42 AMI apologize for blowing up at Todd and also dragging this thread into US politics.  A poster should think twice, but a moderator should never... I've done the literal opposite.
But you've also demonstrated (a) a capacity for reflection and remorse and (b) the act of apology, two things which are anathema to the political right ("decency is for cucks!")
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: AnotherSpin on March 25, 2024, 07:45:37 AM
Quote from: pjme on March 25, 2024, 05:53:35 AMGood. They are worm free now!

Are you calling government worm? May be appropriate.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 25, 2024, 08:22:48 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 07:35:49 AMIt may be the case that people suspicious of government attempts to coerce the population "for the public good" feel more comfortable with one political party than another.

Another possibility is that some people see both parties as materially the same in terms of actual policy implemented *, and also see the decisions made in 2020 as openly authoritarian in nature, sometimes not based on science at all (eg, social distancing), and sometimes obviously detrimental (eg, school closures).  Statists of various sorts often quite reflexively defend the state, defend some celebrity members of the bureaucracy, deny harm occurred, and resist any attempt to hold people and institutions to account.  Governments and corporations involved in the response should be investigated and held accountable.  Some people may even need to face criminal prosecution.  This is not limited to one country.


* As the joke about US foreign policy goes, no matter who you vote for, you end up with John McCain.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 09:33:56 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 25, 2024, 08:22:48 AMAnother possibility is that some people see both parties as materially the same in terms of actual policy implemented *, and also see the decisions made in 2020 as openly authoritarian in nature, sometimes not based on science at all (eg, social distancing), and sometimes obviously detrimental (eg, school closures).  Statists of various sorts often quite reflexively defend the state, defend some celebrity members of the bureaucracy, deny harm occurred, and resist any attempt to hold people and institutions to account.  Governments and corporations involved in the response should be investigated and held accountable.  Some people may even need to face criminal prosecution.  This is not limited to one country.


* As the joke about US foreign policy goes, no matter who you vote for, you end up with John McCain.

Yes, there was a lot of authoritarian behaviour. The police in England seemed to gain arbitrary powers when there wasn't actually any law about how far one could travel. The adjoining county of Derbyshire was really bad for harassing people while in the opposite direction Wales barred us from entry (and made it illegal to buy goods from certain aisles in supermarkets).
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2024, 10:06:33 AM
Some people luxuriate in whataboutery, sure.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 25, 2024, 10:11:10 AM
To everyone here, please don't reopen old arguments (and threads which were closed).  Maybe remember what we have in common vs. the differences?  💔

Just my two cents.

PD
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 11:40:57 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 07:35:49 AMIt may be the case that people suspicious of government attempts to coerce the population "for the public good" feel more comfortable with one political party than another. In any experiment it also makes good scientific sense to have a control group.

That last remark is so cynical and revolting I hardly know where to begin.

But let me just point out the confusion between science and politics demonstrated by squishing the two together like that.

As for the public good, that coercion saved lives. Just as it did in 1919, but people still don't seem to grasp the data on that, and people also seem to discount the economic damage of death.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2024, 12:10:39 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 11:40:57 AMpeople also seem to discount the economic damage of death.
Yes, even though hundreds of thousands of Americans died because the 45th president's idea of addressing a public health crisis was to play golf with Lindsay Graham.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 12:33:45 PM
I wasn't thinking just about the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Que on March 25, 2024, 02:46:09 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 25, 2024, 06:20:42 AMI apologize for blowing up at Todd and also dragging this thread into US politics.  A poster should think twice, but a moderator should never... I've done the literal opposite.

I've been down that rabbit hole many times before...  ;D
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 25, 2024, 06:00:43 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 12:33:45 PMI wasn't thinking just about the US.
Of course.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 09:49:29 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 25, 2024, 11:40:57 AMThat last remark is so cynical and revolting I hardly know where to begin.

But let me just point out the confusion between science and politics demonstrated by squishing the two together like that.

As for the public good, that coercion saved lives. Just as it did in 1919, but people still don't seem to grasp the data on that, and people also seem to discount the economic damage of death.

I was trying to talk more generally rather than argue about the toxic subjects of coronavirus and vaccines. As with the American Flu of 1919 it will take many years for historians to piece together the full story of the pandemic. And I wasn't suggesting forcing people into control groups either, a proportion will self select based on their own judgment if not forced into participant groups.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 01:07:48 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 25, 2024, 09:49:29 PMAnd I wasn't suggesting forcing people into control groups either, a proportion will self select based on their own judgment if not forced into participant groups.


This language still depends on the notion that an "experiment" was involved. That's the primary problem before the bit you're now trying to explain.

As for your claim to be trying to talk more generally... this is the coronavirus thread. We are clearly talking about a particular virus and a particular disease. I'm frankly at a loss to see how your remarks could be construed to be "general" unless you'd like to outline some other examples of governments supposedly coercing people for the public good that were on your mind. Perhaps you had in mind... road rules? Laws requiring school attendance? Paying taxes?

But it's when you get to "experiments" that I really wonder what on earth you might have been talking about besides attempts to control a lethal disease in the last few years.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: steve ridgway on March 26, 2024, 06:38:34 AM
Quote from: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 01:07:48 AMThis language still depends on the notion that an "experiment" was involved. That's the primary problem before the bit you're now trying to explain.

As for your claim to be trying to talk more generally... this is the coronavirus thread. We are clearly talking about a particular virus and a particular disease. I'm frankly at a loss to see how your remarks could be construed to be "general" unless you'd like to outline some other examples of governments supposedly coercing people for the public good that were on your mind. Perhaps you had in mind... road rules? Laws requiring school attendance? Paying taxes?

But it's when you get to "experiments" that I really wonder what on earth you might have been talking about besides attempts to control a lethal disease in the last few years.

I was merely trying to answer your original question "why the hell Covid is treated as a political issue rather than as a scientific and medical one" in the most general way (not thinking specifically of American political parties), and to point out the response was not simply managed by a committee of pure scientists based on strict experimental methodology.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 26, 2024, 07:32:29 AM
Quote from: steve ridgway on March 26, 2024, 06:38:34 AM... and to point out the response was not simply managed by a committee of pure scientists based on strict experimental methodology.


The farthest thing from it.  Politicians bungled the only partially informed suggestions of bureaucrats and scientists, with some nudges from corporations.  Policy responses ranged from mediocre to horrible, with authoritarianism the global constant.  Which some people like. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: AnotherSpin on March 26, 2024, 08:14:07 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 26, 2024, 07:32:29 AMThe farthest thing from it.  Politicians bungled the only partially informed suggestions of bureaucrats and scientists, with some nudges from corporations.  Policy responses ranged from mediocre to horrible, with authoritarianism the global constant.  Which some people like. 

The history of the so-called pandemic demonstrates conclusively that it is not some people who like authoritarianism, but almost everyone.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 26, 2024, 09:06:35 AM
Quote from: AnotherSpin on March 26, 2024, 08:14:07 AMThe history of the so-called pandemic demonstrates conclusively that it is not some people who like authoritarianism, but almost everyone.

I mean we already knew that from the Chinese Communist Party, North Korea and Russia.  Post 9/11 I've also seen some quick concessions to big government in the name of security here in the US.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 26, 2024, 09:10:50 AM
Quote from: Todd on March 26, 2024, 07:32:29 AMThe farthest thing from it.  Politicians bungled the only partially informed suggestions of bureaucrats and scientists, with some nudges from corporations.  Policy responses ranged from mediocre to horrible, with authoritarianism the global constant.  Which some people like. 

Let's not forget that, in the U.S. at least, the authoritarianism was temporary, was in response to an almost unprecedented crisis (in the city where I lived rows or refrigerated semi-trucks were parked outside the public hospital to hold the morgue overflow), were temporary, and were implemented by people who were up for election and could be voted out of office. And they prevented deaths.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 26, 2024, 09:29:05 AM
Quote from: DavidW on March 26, 2024, 09:06:35 AMPost 9/11 I've also seen some quick concessions to big government in the name of security here in the US.

Permanent, structural concessions to big government in the name of national security started no later than with the National Security Act of 1947.  One can go back further and see the Espionage Act and Sedition Act from the Wilson years as concessions to national security, and both laws are still used today.  And the establishment of the CPI, the legacy of which one sees every day.


Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 26, 2024, 09:10:50 AMLet's not forget that, in the U.S. at least, the authoritarianism was temporary, was in response to an almost unprecedented crisis (in the city where I lived rows or refrigerated semi-trucks were parked outside the public hospital to hold the morgue overflow), were temporary, and were implemented by people who were up for election and could be voted out of office. And they prevented deaths.

As I wrote, some people like authoritarianism.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 26, 2024, 09:51:58 AM
And other people don't like the sight of stacks of corpses.

Most of us are nicely vaccinated now, but back in the day people were dying in significant numbers (in elderly homes here in Spain, in hospitals in New York, etc). That's easily forgotten...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 26, 2024, 10:18:56 AM
Quote from: ritter on March 26, 2024, 09:51:58 AMAnd other people don't like the sight of stacks of corpses.

I'm pretty sure no one except serial killers likes to see stacks of corpses, though that may differ by culture, who knows. 

One can look at stats all day long and see the overwhelming evidence that Covid predominantly killed elderly people with comorbidities, and younger people with comorbidities.  And basically zero children, which makes school closure policies entirely unwarranted.  (Fortunately, my youngest wrapped up high school at the start of the pandemic, so no harm for me personally.  Indeed, I ended up wealthier by the time the end was announced by the Pres!)  Given the reported and incontrovertible facts, which were known at the time, as it happens, more targeted, less authoritarian policy options were available.  Sweden offered a less draconian response, and one can look at posts on this very forum, and of course in the corporate press broadly, to see baseless, unscientific, often emotional criticisms of the response of that country.  But as the defensive posts here demonstrate, one mustn't question the responses or criticize governments or sexy bureaucrats.  And one certainly ought not to question the wisdom of liability protection for multinational pharmaceutical corporations. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Spotted Horses on March 26, 2024, 12:17:13 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 26, 2024, 10:18:56 AMOne can look at stats all day long and see the overwhelming evidence that Covid predominantly killed elderly people with comorbidities, and younger people with comorbidities.  And basically zero children, which makes school closure policies entirely unwarranted. 

The justification for closing the schools was never that children were vulnerable. It was that epidemiological studies had shown that schools were a major pathway for the disease to spread through a community. That seems quite plausible to me, I never got sick until I had kids in school. Even in hindsight it is impossible to tell how the progress of the disease would have been different and how many more lives would have been lost without school closings. How to balance loss of life and the impact on education is a difficult value judgement based on highly uncertain data, not a purely scientific decision.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: ritter on March 26, 2024, 12:18:48 PM
Quote from: Todd on March 26, 2024, 10:18:56 AM...Indeed, I ended up wealthier by the time the end was announced by the Pres!... 


Then we should hope for a nice, good war close to home, shouldn't we? That's when savvy investors and businessmen really get wealthier...
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 12:42:06 PM
Ah yes, statistics. A word that can be brought up while ignoring any statistics that don't suit one's argument.

For instance, one can suggest that the disease killed people whose time had come anyway while not mentioning that life expectancy in the USA decreased by 3 years. A statistic that means on average, across the entire population, people were dying quite a bit before their "time".

I'm also tempted to create one of those drinking games based on mentions of Sweden... which can ignore any data on what ACTUALLY happened in Sweden, or any of the cultural factors that influenced the country. (Somewhat reminds me of how Canberra achieved one of the highest vaccination rates in the world without ever mandating anyone get vaccinated, because... Canberra)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 26, 2024, 12:44:54 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 26, 2024, 12:17:13 PMThe justification for closing the schools was never that children were vulnerable. It was that epidemiological studies had shown that schools were a major pathway for the disease to spread through a community. That seems quite plausible to me,
This, in spades. 
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 12:58:15 PM
There were legitimate arguments both ways on schools and whether they were pathways. Children in schools mix with each other but they are not, during school hours, mixing with the wider population.

What often happens in everyday life is that kids bring back something from excursions into the world such as school holiday periods. So a big issue with the pandemic was whether it was feasible to keep schools running but effectively isolated from other activities thanks to non-school restrictions.

I think expert views on this changed over time and depending on conditions. Certainly early on I remember that scientists here were advising against school closures, despite the average parent saying "but we always get diseases from the kids".
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Todd on March 26, 2024, 01:02:01 PM
Quote from: Spotted Horses on March 26, 2024, 12:17:13 PMThe justification for closing the schools was never that children were vulnerable. It was that epidemiological studies had shown that schools were a major pathway for the disease to spread through a community.

I am fully aware of the rationalizations used.  You think they were reasonable.  That's fine.  I do not.  Neither your opinion nor my opinion are scientific. Your rationalization is typical of those who defend policies that ranged from mediocre to horrible.


Quote from: ritter on March 26, 2024, 12:18:48 PMThen we should hope for a nice, good war close to home, shouldn't we? That's when savvy investors and businessmen really get wealthier...

If by "we", you mean Europeans, sure, I guess.  One of the many beauties of being an American is that wars that boost defense industry and financial sector profits, and more than occasionally market indices at the same time, always occur over there.  By over there, I mean in countries on the other side of either big ocean separating us from the tumult of less stable regions - eg, Africa, Europe.  (Sure, one could look at Haiti now, but that's small potatoes and not really going to generate sweet free cash flow, you know what I'm sayin'.)
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Karl Henning on March 26, 2024, 01:06:58 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on March 26, 2024, 12:44:54 PMThis, in spades.
This is non-scientific anecdote, but the latest virus I contracted (not 'flu, not COVID, not strep, but the "none of the above" virus) followed directly after the only time I was in an enclosed space with a substantial population of strange children all year.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 26, 2024, 01:36:40 PM
Quote from: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 12:58:15 PMI think expert views on this changed over time and depending on conditions. Certainly early on I remember that scientists here were advising against school closures, despite the average parent saying "but we always get diseases from the kids".

Policy was always a moving target as we continued to do research and learn more.  Being flexible and dynamic in face of such uncertainty I find to be wise, others, oddly enough, find it to be foolish.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 26, 2024, 01:38:34 PM
Quote from: Karl Henning on March 26, 2024, 01:06:58 PMThis is non-scientific anecdote, but the latest virus I contracted (not 'flu, not COVID, not strep, but the "none of the above" virus) followed directly after the only time I was in an enclosed space with a substantial population of strange children all year.

As a teacher at a boarding school TELL ME ABOUT IT.  Illness spreads like wildfire here.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Madiel on March 26, 2024, 01:45:25 PM
Quote from: DavidW on March 26, 2024, 01:36:40 PMPolicy was always a moving target as we continued to do research and learn more.  Being flexible and dynamic in face of such uncertainty I find to be wise, others, oddly enough, find it to be foolish.

I don't know about your media-political culture, but around here changing your mind is regularly portrayed as some kind of disaster or sign of weakness. The theory seems to be that between elections you're not supposed to actually take on data or think or govern.

And when it comes to science there's a similar attitude. Scientists are just supposed to state the answer. There's no insight into how the scientific method actually works.

I always marvelled at one interview with a now long-departed politician. In the same interview his answer to one question was a very open "I don't know" and his response to a quote from a few years earlier was "I've changed my mind". My estimation of him went up massively because of his willingness to publicly say both those things.
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2024, 03:44:52 AM
Yesterday while doing a crossword puzzle, I ran across a number of quotes from Richard Feynman one of which was "I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned".

And "We never are definitely right, we can only be sure we are wrong".

From this website  https://www.azquotes.com/author/4774-Richard_P_Feynman
Title: Re: Coronavirus thread
Post by: DavidW on March 27, 2024, 03:52:15 AM
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on March 27, 2024, 03:44:52 AMAnd "We never are definitely right, we can only be sure we are wrong".

Karl Popper's falsification theory.  There are other philosophies of science, but that tends to be the one I use as a compass.

What is interesting or maddening is David Hume's philosophy which turns the entire idea of science and empiricism on its head.  I see it more as a reflection that we have unspoken axioms necessary for the endeavor of scientific inquiry.