Quote from: Jo498 on May 07, 2024, 11:12:15 AMI saw the video, I commented after listening to all of it. Obviously, the observation that the tune has been used for different purposes by different ideologies is true. But it's also trite and very little follows from that.
The simplest explanation would be that it is so "neutral" that it can be used for these different purposes.
Another fairly simple one with which I could also agree is that Beethoven expresses that "togetherness" so well that it can be used for any boosting of morale of a collective. That's still not deep enough that I'd need to consult a professor to get it...
I should have been more precise in the points of disagreement. As I said I agree that "joyful community" can be said to be expressed by the Ode of Joy (and this agrees also with the text).
But someone like Zizek sees this expression of joy in community already as ideology because some are *excluded* and again, one can even find this in the text that has the line after the enumeration of causes for joy (friendship, marriage...) "und wer's nie gekonnt, der stehle, weinend sich aus diesem Bund", i.e. who is not even joined to one other soul in friendship should go aways in tears. That's not very nice, in fact rather cruel unless one supposes that such a person must necessarily be so antisocial (by their own fault?) that the only solution is to exclude (not exterminate them). Again, Schiller's Ode was closer to a fraternity drinking song, so it's not a theory of morality.
So to "save" Beethoven from the charge of ideology Zizek claims that the "turkish music" section ridicules the ideology that would at least tend to flow from the "straight" version of the Ode. And here I think he is wrong in several ways, Beethoven would not have had such a fear of ideologization and need for deconstruction. Beethoven was himself a social misfit, even before his deafness and he enjoyed some kinds of musical deconstruction (e.g. in the Diabellis) but this is not such a case, as I tried to explain above. The alla marcia is not for the misfits (it would have helped not to disregard the text...) The deconstruction would in any case be overwhelmed by the clearly affirmative recap of the straight version of the Ode after the instrumental fugato and the rest of the movement with all kinds of affirmation/jubilation.
Beethoven and contemporaries were not stupid. They had witnessed the great ideological catastrophe, the French Revolution and the Terreur, the following wars, and many, like Schiller or Beethoven, had tempered their progressive attitudes (without abolishing the hope for enlightenment and more participative forms of government).
Quote from: AnotherSpin on Today at 01:38:39 AMNot so much reading as remembering a book I read several decades ago in Russian translation. Back then, in the 70s, Mario Vargas Llosa was quite often translated into Russian and hugely published. I probably read 5 or more of his books then. Latin American writers were favoured in the USSR, perhaps they were considered irreconcilable warriors against the domination of world imperialism, anyway at the end we received good literature: Marquez, Cortázar, Carpentier, Fuentes, Amado, then Borges and Bioy Casares, and all the rest.
Quote from: Que on May 07, 2024, 11:18:07 PMRobin is to the greenwood GoneThanks for the recommendation! Another O'Dette recording I love and have listened to a lot is Bach Lute works, vol. 1 from 2007. Ever since then I have been waiting in vain for vol. 2 to appear. Anyone knows anything about this, why it never appeared (or if it's out and I've missed it)?
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 18 queries.