GMG Classical Music Forum

The Music Room => General Classical Music Discussion => Topic started by: The new erato on May 28, 2007, 12:49:36 AM

Title: Asrael
Post by: The new erato on May 28, 2007, 12:49:36 AM
With the tremendous amount of postings re all things Mahler, how come nobody EVER mentions the Asrael Symphony by Josef Suk? Originally planned as a tribute to his father-in-law, Dvorak, who died in 1904, it took on a deeper meaning after Suk's own wife died in 1905. A long work, around 60 minutes, for large orchestra and in 5 movements, with drama and tragedy all over - named after the Muslim Angel of Death, this is EXACTLY the thing Mahler fanatics would love. I am listening to RLPO/Pesek on Virgin now, very fine recording.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Harry on May 28, 2007, 12:52:25 AM
I have the same recording, and also a old one from Neumann, which I bought years ago.
Josef Suk is and was always high on my list, and I have most Orchestral works from him.
A voice not to ignore.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Grazioso on May 28, 2007, 03:33:45 AM
Quote from: erato on May 28, 2007, 12:49:36 AM
With the tremendous amount of postings re all things Mahler, how come nobody EVER mentions the Asrael Symphony by Josef Suk? Originally planned as a tribute to his father-in-law, Dvorak, who died in 1904, it took on a deeper meaning after Suk's own wife died in 1905. A long work, around 60 minutes, for large orchestra and in 5 movements, with drama and tragedy all over - named after the Muslim Angel of Death, this is EXACTLY the thing Mahler fanatics would love. I am listening to RLPO/Pesek on Virgin now, very fine recording.

I have to disagree and call it an overrated, boring work. In my experience, Suk is basically two composers: before the deaths of Dvorak and Suk's wife, Suk wrote gloriously melodic music suffused with that trademark Czech warmth, pieces like the Serenade, Fairy Tale, Fantastic Scherzo, and so forth. Then, after his personal tragedies, came the bloated symphonies/symphonic poems (Asrael, The Ripening, etc.) with their forgettable melodic material. As someone who loves both Mahler and a lot of Suk, I've yet to find Asrael worth my while, despite multiple patient listens. And Asreal is certainly not in the same league as Mahler, or even close.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: PerfectWagnerite on May 28, 2007, 04:54:51 AM
I agree with Grazioso. I also have the Neumann recording FWIW. I love Mahler, and I think Asrael is not musically very interesting. It just sounds bloated and nothing else. Anyone can write a 60 minute symphony, but no one writes a 60 minute symphony like Mahler.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Mark G. Simon on May 28, 2007, 06:18:49 AM
I happened to hear Asrael on the radio last night and was mightily impressed.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: david johnson on May 28, 2007, 06:52:27 AM
my cd is: Kirill Petrenko/Berlin Comic Opera Orchestra

i don't listen to it often, but it isn't bad.

dj
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: vandermolen on May 28, 2007, 01:00:32 PM
I find it a moving, powerful,tragic yet consoling work; Suk's masterpiece, although he wrote some fine chamber music. I have several recordings of Asrael, including excellent ones from Kubelik, Belohlavek and Neumann.

if you like this score (and clearly not everyone here does), I'd recommend music by his contemporary Novak, especially his magnificent cantata "The Storm", which cries out for a modern recording.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Todd on May 29, 2007, 05:03:19 AM
Asrael is a fine work.  I have the Pesek / Virgin and Neumann / Supraphon recordings, and prefer the former.  It has a granduer and power the earlier recording doesn't have.  Still need to try Kubelik.  As a symphony, it doesn't really compare to Mahler's best works, but then most other symphonies don't either.  Personally, I think Suk's finest orchestral work is A Summer's Tale.  Wonderful stuff.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: vandermolen on May 29, 2007, 05:43:30 AM
Quote from: Todd on May 29, 2007, 05:03:19 AM
Asrael is a fine work.  I have the Pesek / Virgin and Neumann / Supraphon recordings, and prefer the former.  It has a granduer and power the earlier recording doesn't have.  Still need to try Kubelik.  As a symphony, it doesn't really compare to Mahler's best works, but then most other symphonies don't either.  Personally, I think Suk's finest orchestral work is A Summer's Tale.  Wonderful stuff.

I agree that the Pesek is very fine but Kubelik is the best I think.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Grazioso on May 30, 2007, 03:48:41 AM
Quote from: Captain Haddock on May 28, 2007, 01:00:32 PM
I find it a moving, powerful,tragic yet consoling work; Suk's masterpiece, although he wrote some fine chamber music. I have several recordings of Asrael, including excellent ones from Kubelik, Belohlavek and Neumann.

if you like this score (and clearly not everyone here does), I'd recommend music by his contemporary Novak, especially his magnificent cantata "The Storm", which cries out for a modern recording.

Other Novak well worth hearing--and at times his music is more immediately evocative of Mahler--includes Lady Godiva and Pan.
Title: Re: Asrael
Post by: Sergeant Rock on May 30, 2007, 06:41:47 AM
This came in the mail today:

(http://photos.imageevent.com/sgtrock/web/Tal10.jpg)

Hurwitz gave it a 10 for performance. He says, "Talich was a close friend of Josef Suk, and his recordings of Asrael and Ripening remain the benchmarks by which all others should be measured."  Full review  here at ClassicsToday (http://www.classicstoday.com/review.asp?ReviewNum=10348).

I don't know if that's true or just one man's opinion. I'll listen tonight and compare it with the other versions I own.

Sarge