Quote from: Spotted Horses on Today at 07:17:16 AMOn the other hand, what could an malicious actor want from this site? To gain unauthorized access to our preference for Bruckner symphonies?
Quote from: prémont on Today at 11:33:07 AMYes, you are right
Yes, you are right. I have re-read the OP. However I didn't imagine this explanation, maybe because I don't see much purpose in ranking no.s 11 to 20. What's the next? Ranking no.s 21 to 30? One can go on ad libitum and the results wouldn't count for anyone.
Quote from: Brian on Today at 11:16:21 AMIt is because he is trying to rank his personal #11-20, not his top 10, and the mono version is already in his top 10.
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on Today at 06:31:34 AMI found out a little bit of information about the work (see link below). Apparently, the composer had initially called it "Uncle Tom". No idea as to why he had renamed it to "Uncle Teddy" when it was published. https://www.rundel.de/en/article/uncle_teddy/MVSR2323
PD
Quote from: prémont on Today at 10:58:04 AMFor some unknown reason Todd used Backhaus' stereo recording for comparison. The earlier mono recording is generally more successful.It is because he is trying to rank his personal #11-20, not his top 10, and the mono version is already in his top 10.
Quote from: Pohjolas Daughter on Today at 10:09:08 AMYour first comment had also crossed my mind...wondering how much it might deter people. We classical music lovers are a determined group however!
Your second point is an interesting one. Also, is there a way to block downloading of pages/topics/threads? Would that be possible? Just throwing out some ideas.
PD
Page created in 1.722 seconds with 18 queries.