GMG Classical Music Forum

The Music Room => General Classical Music Discussion => Topic started by: snyprrr on February 13, 2011, 07:39:51 PM

Title: Classical Grammies
Post by: snyprrr on February 13, 2011, 07:39:51 PM
uh,... I was hoping you'd link. :-[


Thanks, dahling! :-*
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Brian on February 14, 2011, 12:07:43 AM
Based on what I saw on Twitter, Naxos-distributed labels won pretty much everything. CSO Resound won best album for Verdi's Requiem, the Nashville SO won best orchestral performance for Michael Daugherty's Metropolis Symphony, Michael Daugherty won best new composition for ditto, the engineers won best engineering for ditto, and organist Paul Jacobs won best solo performance for Messiaen's Livre du sacraments (or something like that - I forget what it's really called).
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: karlhenning on February 14, 2011, 01:32:00 AM
Well, you must be pleased, Brian! I think I remember you liking the Daugherty.
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Senta on February 14, 2011, 01:42:51 AM
Daugherty can be quite fun indeed! Haven't heard the abovementioned recording yet though..

How is that CSO Verdi Requiem, anyone have it? I wouldn't mind checking it out sometime.
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Brian on February 14, 2011, 02:09:34 AM
Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on February 14, 2011, 01:32:00 AM
Well, you must be pleased, Brian! I think I remember you liking the Daugherty.

I liked the new "Ghost Ranch" piece, but thought the prize-winning Metropolis Symphony overlong.  :-X Still, it was only one listen, and I will be very happy to listen again. Maybe even right now!
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Lethevich on February 14, 2011, 03:30:25 AM
Quote from: Brian on February 14, 2011, 12:07:43 AM
the Nashville SO won best orchestral performance for Michael Daugherty's Metropolis Symphony, Michael Daugherty won best new composition for ditto, the engineers won best engineering for ditto

(http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/4779/clipboard01vb.jpg)

Oh award ceremonies, you so randum :-[
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: MishaK on February 14, 2011, 07:33:35 AM
Quote from: Senta on February 14, 2011, 01:42:51 AM
How is that CSO Verdi Requiem, anyone have it? I wouldn't mind checking it out sometime.

I have it, but have to confess still not having given it a spin. Will have to do so ASAP and let you know. Though I can't say I have much of a point of reference in this work. FWIW, the reviews of the concerts from which the CD was recorded were pretty ecstatic. The classicstoday review was pretty good, too: http://classicstoday.com/review.asp?ReviewNum=12996

Why is this thread in the Diner?
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: DavidRoss on February 14, 2011, 08:50:05 AM
If anyone's interested, nominees and winners: http://www.grammy.com/nominees?year=2010&genre=5
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: bhodges on February 14, 2011, 09:07:16 AM
Some well-deserved winners last night (at least, in the classical category). I'm eager to hear that Muti Verdi Requiem, too.

And I was so happy Paul Jacobs won for the Messiaen, which I wrote about here (http://www.juilliard.edu/journal/2010-2011/1011/articles/discoveries.php) last December. For anyone who likes the composer, or organ CDs, it's pretty terrific (and if you turn up the volume, definitely in the "blow your house apart" category  ;D).

--Bruce
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Brian on February 14, 2011, 09:11:08 AM
Quote from: Brewski on February 14, 2011, 09:07:16 AM(at least, in the classical category)

Arcade Fire's one of the few contemporary bands I really enjoy, indeed one of the few I can even tolerate for more than 15 minutes. I'm a little afraid of what their win means, though, because although they are good, now everybody knows about them so (a) I'm not one of The Cool Kids (b) their tickets aren't going to be cheap. Indeed, for their London concert in June they've booked, as a venue, Hyde Park. As in, the actual park.  ;D
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: bhodges on February 14, 2011, 09:15:15 AM
Yes! I was very pleased--and more than a little surprised--that they won. (And it was amusing to see Lady Gaga looking a little disappointed; something tells me she may have thought she was a shoe-in.)

Anyway, yes, glad they got the nod. Are you going to the Hyde Park concert?

--Bruce
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: MishaK on February 14, 2011, 10:13:29 AM
Quote from: Senta on February 14, 2011, 01:42:51 AM
How is that CSO Verdi Requiem, anyone have it? I wouldn't mind checking it out sometime.

Update: You can hear the Dies Irae streaming on the NPR website (http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivecadence/2011/02/14/133749135/dark-horses-and-indie-labels-an-eclectic-mix-at-the-classical-grammys).
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: Senta on February 14, 2011, 02:32:31 PM
Quote from: Mensch on February 14, 2011, 10:13:29 AM
Update: You can hear the Dies Irae streaming on the NPR website (http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivecadence/2011/02/14/133749135/dark-horses-and-indie-labels-an-eclectic-mix-at-the-classical-grammys).

Rollicking and impressive clip there, really enjoyed!

I'm really not familar with Daugherty's Deus Ex Machina, but Metropolis Symphony, yes, have the Baltimore Symphony/Zinman recording, which is very nice. Kind of a wild, fun piece, lots of special effects apropos of a comic book inspired work.

Btw, I am so glad Justin Bieber didn't win Best New Artist as an aside, surprised they actually awarded someone of quality.
Title: Re: Classical Grammies
Post by: mc ukrneal on February 14, 2011, 11:20:00 PM
Quote from: Mensch on February 14, 2011, 10:13:29 AM
Update: You can hear the Dies Irae streaming on the NPR website (http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivecadence/2011/02/14/133749135/dark-horses-and-indie-labels-an-eclectic-mix-at-the-classical-grammys).
The one thing I dislike is when the Dies Irae slows down in tempo because it is over-heavy. Unfortunately that is what happens here. With each entry, it gets slower and more ponderous. Maybe not everyone cares so much (or has a different view), but this is inevitably one of the problems I have with many recordings. This is why Shaw and Karajan and among the better ones for me - they start slower and don't have issues maintaining the tempo.  I recently ordered a few more versions to find one that will satisfy. And I think the metronome marking is 80 or so, which means that many take it too fast anyway (although I might like it faster if they could maintain it, which is almost never the case).