My list as of today
Mozart
Rossini
Bellini
Verdi
Massenet
Your turn.
Machaut
Bach
Carter
Cage
Shostakovich
Wagner
Mahler
Liszt
Beethoven
Rachmaninov
Stravinsky
Haydn
Chopin
JSB
(The moment I nominate a fifth, I'll think of a sixth whom I'll upbraid myself for having forgotten.)
Vasks
Tabakov
Pettersson
RVW
DSCH
Easy enough choice today 👍
Shostakovich
Bruckner
Dvořák
Tchaikovsky
Sibelius
Amazing lists, gentlemen. Let me give it a shot...
Johannes Brahms
Gustav Mahler
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Johann Sebastian Bach
Maurice Ravel
Kind of a white-bread list, I realize, but I couldn't leave any of them out. Then, of course, there's about fifty other composers who might edge out one of them on a good day.
Bach
Haydn
Mozart
Beethoven
Brahms
For all time, but for current listening:
Bach
Schubert
Bruckner
Mahler
Shostakovich
Okay so I have all time, and I have recently but if I expand it to past few months (i.e. the intermediate) then I have
Schubert
Bruckner
Wagner
Sibelius
Shostakovich
Quote from: OrchestralNut on March 22, 2023, 03:24:39 PMShostakovich
Bruckner
Dvořák
Tchaikovsky
Sibelius
I'll follow David's lead. Above is "all-time", or overall.
Top 5 current listening:
Bacewicz
*Classical guitar
Falla
*Ballet music
Shostakovich
*A mishmash of composers. :D
Quote from: OrchestralNut on March 23, 2023, 07:03:50 AMI'll follow David's lead.
And I was following Florestan's lead! ;D
Wagner
Mahler
Bruckner
Sibelius
Haydn
1. Rameau
2. Ravel
3. Copland
4. Debussy
5. Tchaikovsky
Quote from: foxandpeng on March 22, 2023, 03:04:33 PMVasks
Tabakov
Pettersson
RVW
DSCH
Easy enough choice today 👍
Must listen to more Tabakov!
Vaughan Williams
Miaskovsky
Shostakovich
Copland
Bax
Not ranked
Boulez
Carter
Cage
Schoenberg
Machaut
Quote from: Peter Power Pop on May 12, 2023, 11:01:52 PM1. Rameau
2. Ravel
3. Copland
4. Debussy
5. Tchaikovsky
Question! Given this ranking, does it mean that the Vikingur Olafsson album combining Debussy and Rameau is basically heaven for you? Or do you have thoughts on how those composers go together?
Beethoven
Dvorak
Haydn
Janacek
Chopin
Quote from: vandermolen on May 12, 2023, 11:07:31 PMMust listen to more Tabakov!
Yes! Moar Tabakov!!
My choices remain the same, I think. At least for now.
Vasks
Tabakov
Pettersson
RVW
DSCH
Quote from: Brian on May 13, 2023, 07:20:42 AMQuestion! Given this ranking, does it mean that the Vikingur Olafsson album combining Debussy and Rameau is basically heaven for you? Or do you have thoughts on how those composers go together?
I'm not a huge fan of Rameau's keyboard music. But Debussy's on the other hand... [Chef's kiss].
I don't think of Rameau and Debussy as composers that should ever be put together on a program. There's nothing stylistically to link the two, so to have a disc with both of them is weird to me.
Having typed that, I'll have a listen to Ólafsson's album.
Compare and contrast:
For Rameau, are you more of an opera guy?
The booklet quotes Debussy speaking highly of Rameau as a revolutionary. I can find the quotes tomorrow morning and post some.
Quote from: Brian on May 13, 2023, 03:42:45 PMFor Rameau, are you more of an opera guy?
The booklet quotes Debussy speaking highly of Rameau as a revolutionary. I can find the quotes tomorrow morning and post some.
My introduction to Rameau was the suites from the operas (see below), and from there I moved on to the operas. I love all of it. The music of Rameau speaks to me in a way that no other composer does. His keyboard and chamber works don't speak to me in quite the same way. I like them, but they don't have the effect on me that his fully orchestrated (and vocal) stuff does.
As for Debussy, he wrote
Hommage à Rameau which is from
Images Book I:
This was the very first piece of music I heard of Rameau:
I was hooked from the start.
For me the magic of Rameau is you never know what he's going to do next. In common reputation maybe, "baroque" has this reputation as predictable, neat, formal music that tick-tocks along, but Rameau has so many cool, wild ideas. Biber is like that too.
Quote from: Peter Power Pop on May 13, 2023, 04:54:47 PMMy introduction to Rameau was the suites from the operas (see below), and from there I moved on to the operas. I love all of it. The music of Rameau speaks to me in a way that no other composer does. His keyboard and chamber works don't speak to me in quite the same way. I like them, but they don't have the effect on me that his fully orchestrated (and vocal) stuff does.
As for Debussy, he wrote Hommage à Rameau which is from Images Book I:
Olafsson saves that for the very end, as the last track on his album. Here's what he writes in the booklet about pairing the two composers:
"Debussy had been swept away by a performance of the first two acts of Rameau's opera
Castor et Pollux [in 1903]. In his superlative review, he described the music as "so personal in tone, so new in construction, that space and time are defeated and Rameau seems to be contemporary." Curiously, the more time I spent with Rameau's keyboard music, the more my mind wandered to Debussy and the seemingly unlikely affinity of that revolutionary, who openly disregarded tradition and denounced all musical rules except the law of pleasure, to the founding father of French musical theory and pedagogy. Upon closer inspection, I found that being a revolutionary is one of the very things the two had in common. Despite very different historical circumstances, both possessed a rare kind of relentless intellectual independence.
"Another shared element...is what could be called a synaesthetic streak. In my view, a certain blending of sensory experience seems natural to how the two approached music. Debussy famously surrounded himself with poets and painters, drawing inspiration from a wide range of sources. Dubbed the "Newton of Harmony", Rameau had a certain scientific interest in the colours of sounds as well as in light, but also a remarkable originality in what we call the colours of orchestration....Both composers wrote music which engages more senses than just hearing. And both enjoyed giving their compositions titles that stimulate the imagination."
Anyway, the proof is (or isn't) in the listening!
Quote from: vandermolen on May 12, 2023, 11:07:31 PMMust listen to more Tabakov!
Only if you want to develop depression and anger issues... >:D
Quote from: kyjo on May 22, 2023, 03:09:39 PMOnly if you want to develop depression and anger issues... >:D
Or address them 😁
Beethoven
Tchaikovsky
Sibelius
Puccini
Satie
Clearly this might change tommorow!
Beethoven
Tchaikovsky
Sibelius
Puccini
Satie
Clearly this might change tommorow!
Bach
Beethoven
Bruckner
Sibelius
Tchaikovsky
In alphabetical order. ;D
Oy! This is just too impossible, although I think - because of my (apparently genetic ;) ) affinity for them, my top 3 will always be
Bruckner, Mahler, Schoenberg...
Never to be forgotten:
Karl Amadeus Hartmann, a quasi-
Salvador Dali of Music, creating fantastic and even nightmarish soundscapes of The Id.
But then come all kinds of others, especially Russian composers:
Scriabin, S. Taneyev, Nikolai and Alexander Tcherepnin,
Prokofiev and Sergei Protopopov, Rimsky-Korsakov, Vyacheslav Ovchinnikov,...
Certainly
Beethoven and
Charles Ives could rotate into the top 5!
And also never to be forgotten: our creator of
Kammeredelsteine and other wonderful works for chorus and for orchestras:
Karl Henning!e.g.