What were you listening to? (CLOSED)

Started by Maciek, April 06, 2007, 02:22:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 78 Guests are viewing this topic.

Franco

Haydn: Op. 20
Quatuor Mosaiques

kishnevi

Quote from: DavidRoss on August 10, 2010, 05:40:38 AM
Uh-oh...do I really need more LvB sonata recordings?

Now playing:

Of course you do!

Thread duty.
Also Rachmaninov:
Isle of the Dead/Symphonic Dances /Concertgebouw/Ashkenazy

Sergeant Rock

Bruckner, piano pieces played on a mid-19th century Bösendorfer. Music for the ballroom and for the intimate salon:




Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Brahmsian

Quote from: Scarpia on August 10, 2010, 06:16:33 AM
Symphony No 1 ("Classical") of Prokofiev, Jarvi.



Boring in the extreme.  No surprise.  I've had the same reaction to every recording I've heard of this work (Karajan and Weller, I think).


Well, that is your opinion, and of course, you are entitled to it.  :)  I love the Classical symphony, I think it's fantastic, and a lot more interesting than your regular, run of the mill symphony.  Give me this Prokofiev symphony over all of Haydn's symphonies and most, but not all of Mozart's.   8)

Franco

Quote from: Brahmsian on August 10, 2010, 06:57:35 AM
Give me this Prokofiev symphony [1st] over all of Haydn's symphonies and most, but not all of Mozart's.   8)

That's going a bit far, IMO - but I get your point.

:)

karlhenning

It is a fine piece.  Which is why Järvi's recording in this set makes the angels weep.

karlhenning

R. Strauss
Vier letzte Lieder, Opus posth.
Heather Harper, sop
LSO

Hickox

Harry

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 10, 2010, 07:17:39 AM
It is a fine piece.  Which is why Järvi's recording in this set makes the angels weep.

It seems as if most conductors do not know how to handle this piece, and frankly I only heard one recording of it on Decca with the ASMF, Marriner conducting, who gave a good performance on all counts. The recording was from the seventies, and I cannot find it, otherwise I would buy it.

Keemun

Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. - Ludwig van Beethoven

Franco

Quote from: Keemun on August 10, 2010, 07:41:09 AM


That looks to be a wonderful recording - both works are favorites of mine, and the Borodin would seem to be perfect in this repertory.  I've heard of, but don't think I've heard, the soloists - but would expect they are more than capable.

BMW

QuoteQuote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on Today at 11:17:39 AM
It is a fine piece.  Which is why Järvi's recording in this set makes the angels weep.



It seems as if most conductors do not know how to handle this piece, and frankly I only heard one recording of it on Decca with the ASMF, Marriner conducting, who gave a good performance on all counts. The recording was from the seventies, and I cannot find it, otherwise I would buy it.

One of my favorite pieces.  The Marriner disc sounds good-- there seems to be a few fairly inexpensive copies available:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Symphony-C-Classical-Prokofiev/dp/B00000E3C1/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1281455386&sr=8-4
http://www.amazon.com/Bizet-Prokofiev-Classical-Stravinsky-Pulcinella/dp/B00000E3C1   
http://www.arkivmusic.com/classical/album.jsp?album_id=177937

not edward

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 10, 2010, 07:17:39 AM
It is a fine piece.  Which is why Järvi's recording in this set makes the angels weep.
I'm going to play 'stuck record player' and recommend Ancerl for a very different take on the Classical. (And it comes with the semi-legendary Baloghova recording of the Second Piano Concerto.)

I've been listening to some Mravinsky recordings of Prokofiev. It's a shame he only did record the 5th and 6th symphonies, plus the second Romeo and Juliet suite, as I think they're very fine performances--more than just that in the case of the 6th.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

Scarpia

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on August 10, 2010, 07:17:39 AM
It is a fine piece.  Which is why Järvi's recording in this set makes the angels weep.

One issue is the in the Jarvi set the engineers seem to have used a consistent recording perspective for all of the symphonies.  A sound-stage that seems full with the heavy orchestration of the later symphonies doesn't bring out the required detail in the classical symphony.  But Jarvi is not the person to conduct that sort of music, neither is Karajan.  It needs a chamber orchestra, and there are surprisingly few recordings from specialists in smaller ensembles.  Maybe this one, from Orpheus:


Sergeant Rock

Handel, Dixit Dominus, Balthasar-Neumann Ensemble conducted by Thomas Hengelbrock




Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Père Malfait

Aha! Found it! Currently listening . . .

Lee T. Nunley, MA, PMP, CSM
Organist, Harpsichordist, Musicologist, Project Manager

Brahmsian

Prokofiev

Disc 4

Symphony No. 5 in B flat major, Op.100
Symphony No. 7 in C sharp minor, Op.131



Sergeant Rock

Quote from: edward on August 10, 2010, 08:34:45 AM
I'm going to play 'stuck record player' and recommend Ancerl for a very different take on the Classical. (And it comes with the semi-legendary Baloghova recording of the Second Piano Concerto.)

Quote from: Scarpia on August 10, 2010, 08:43:07 AM
One issue is the in the Jarvi set the engineers seem to have used a consistent recording perspective for all of the symphonies.  A sound-stage that seems full with the heavy orchestration of the later symphonies doesn't bring out the required detail in the classical symphony.  But Jarvi is not the person to conduct that sort of music, neither is Karajan.  It needs a chamber orchestra, and there are surprisingly few recordings from specialists in smaller ensembles.  Maybe this one, from Orpheus:



My current fave "Classical" is Ozawa's (but you knew that). I haven't listened to either performance you gents mention in quite awhile. I will after dinner, and I'll report:



Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Brahmsian


Scarpia

#70358
Quote from: Brahmsian on August 10, 2010, 09:47:43 AM
So, there is no conductor for this recording, correct?

That is true of all Orpheus recordings.  They have a complicated system where different orchestra members rotate into leadership positions, and direct the performances.

Brahmsian

Quote from: Scarpia on August 10, 2010, 09:48:57 AM
That is true of all Orpheus recordings.  They have a complicated system where different orchestra members rotate into leadership positions, and direct the performances.

Hmm, that is interesting.  I kinda of like that idea.