Mendelssohn vs. Wagner

Started by MN Dave, September 11, 2009, 05:26:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which do you prefer?

Mendelssohn
21 (47.7%)
Wagner
23 (52.3%)

Total Members Voted: 36

karlhenning

All we're supposed to do is try to make people happy: Not a bad musical manifesto, IMO

karlhenning

Quote from: James on September 11, 2009, 10:02:48 AM
It is. There is just a whole lot more going on in Wagner harmonically, a lot more depth - in that regard he was the greatest thing to come along since JS Bach.

Right; so much more important than Beethoven in that regard.

karlhenning

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on September 11, 2009, 10:54:37 AM
On the other hand, whites are generally so full of self-hatred and guilt

Speak for yourself.

(Oh! You were.)

ChamberNut

Wow, who could have possibly predicted that a Mendelssohn vs. Wagner thread could have started such a heated flame war?  :o

MN Dave

Flame war? This is standard GMG activity.  ;D

ChamberNut

Quote from: MN Dave on September 11, 2009, 11:21:57 AM
Flame war? This is standard GMG activity.  ;D

Your avatar is really cracking me up.  ;D

MN Dave

Quote from: ChamberNut on September 11, 2009, 11:23:44 AM
Your avatar is really cracking me up.  ;D

'Tis but the largest of rodents.

karlhenning

Quote from: MN Dave on September 11, 2009, 11:26:38 AM
'Tis but the largest of rodents.

Oh, they said that of Wagner, too.

jochanaan

Mendelssohn.  He's less tiring to play! ;D
Imagination + discipline = creativity

DavidW

Quote from: ChamberNut on September 11, 2009, 11:19:03 AM
Wow, who could have possibly predicted that a Mendelssohn vs. Wagner thread could have started such a heated flame war?  :o

Actually this has happened several times over!  That's why I poked Dave for starting it. ;D

MN Dave


ChamberNut

Quote from: MN Dave on September 11, 2009, 12:06:53 PM
He's always poking me.  >:(

Maybe you and Dave should keep this to yourselves.  :P

MN Dave



not edward

Incidentally, I found a photograph of the real JdP:

"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

DavidW


Valentino

Winner gets Brünnhilde. For one night only. But what a night!
I love music. Sadly, I'm an audiophile too.
Audio-Technica | Bokrand | Thorens | Yamaha | MiniDSP | WiiM | Topping | Hypex | ICEpower | Mundorf | SEAS | Beyma

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: James on September 11, 2009, 10:02:48 AM
It is. There is just a whole lot more going on in Wagner harmonically, a lot more depth - in that regard he was the greatest thing to come along since JS Bach. And of course, because of this he forever changed the course of music afterward - can't be argued.


What would have been really nice, extra special even, is if he had changed it for the better.... can't be argued. :)

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

IlikeMahler

Wagner is the greater genius, but I prefer Mendelssohn.

I see Wagner more as an influential inventor of new musical tools, than as a genius creator a great music.

Superhorn

  I enjoy Mendelssohn's music . It's elegantly crafted and melodious, but compared to composers such as Beethoven, Brahms,Tchaikovsky,Dvorak,
Schumann and other 19th century composers, it's a bit on the bland side.
  The comparison between him and Wagner is a bit unfair, because Wagner was almost entirely an opera composer (his non-operatic works are interesting but little-known), and Mendelssohn worked in virtually all forms. He wrote a couple of brief operas, but they're almost totally unknown.
  I have been a passionate Wagnerite since my teenage uyears about 40 years ago, and my love for his music has never wavered. Mendelssohn's music, fine as it is, pales by comparison .
  And Mendelssohn died rather young, before his 40th birthday. Who knows how he might have developed if he had lived to a ripe old age ?
  He might have produced works that are not at all bland.