Schumann vs Mendelssohn

Started by Brahmsian, November 04, 2010, 05:51:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which one is your favorite?

Robert Schumann
Felix Mendelssohn

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: Florestan on November 04, 2010, 12:08:09 PM
Quite so. What are your favorite recordings of NB's music?

I don't know about recordings, but my favored piece is the fourth string quartet, opus 14.

Florestan

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on November 04, 2010, 12:13:01 PM
I don't know about recordings, but my favored piece is the fourth string quartet, opus 14.
Never heard it --- any recommendations?
"Beauty must appeal to the senses, must provide us with immediate enjoyment, must impress us or insinuate itself into us without any effort on our part." - Claude Debussy

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: Florestan on November 04, 2010, 12:19:27 PM
Never heard it --- any recommendations?

I only have this one:

http://www.amazon.com/Norbert-Burgm%C3%BCller-String-Quartets-opp/dp/B00004Y6OB/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1288902823&sr=8-6

I liked the performance, though i can't say how good it is, since i have nothing to compare it to. Actually, i'm not even sure if there's even another recording to compare it to in the first place.

Florestan

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on November 04, 2010, 12:34:48 PM
I only have this one:

http://www.amazon.com/Norbert-Burgm%C3%BCller-String-Quartets-opp/dp/B00004Y6OB/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1288902823&sr=8-6

I liked the performance, though i can't say how good it is, since i have nothing to compare it to. Actually, i'm not even sure if there's even another recording to compare it to in the first place.
Yeah, looks like this is the only one.. Anyway, I've been listening to his two symphonies and IMO they are much more Sturm-und-Drang-ish than any  Haydn would ever get!  ;D
"Beauty must appeal to the senses, must provide us with immediate enjoyment, must impress us or insinuate itself into us without any effort on our part." - Claude Debussy

Air

#44
Organ: Mendelssohn, I guess...
Orchestral: Tie
Choral: Tie
Operatic: meh
Chamber: Schumann
Concerti: Schumann
Songs: SCHUMANN
Piano: SCHUMANN
"Summit or death, either way, I win." ~ Robert Schumann

Dancing Divertimentian

Schumann. One of those guys who just bled piano tunes.

Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

marvinbrown

 

  I voted Schumann because I  love his solo piano work, his song cycles and Scene's from Goethe's Faust.  I have yet to explore the chamber music which I bought recently in a 6CD set from EMI to commemorate Schumann's 200th Anniversary. 

  Unfortunately after listening to Mendelssohn's concertos, Midsummer's Night Dream I am not tempted to explore any further.  Yes the Violin Concerto in E minor is GLORIOUS but that's where it begins and ends for Mendelssohn as far as I am concerned.

  marvin

The Six


Mirror Image

I don't like either composer enough to choose.

Sid

Having recently seen two of these guys works recently in concert, I think I like them equally. I saw the lyrical and "wholly ravishing" (as Clara called it) Schumann Cello Concerto, and the Mendelssohn Piano Trio No. 2, whose finale struck me as such a grand and sublime statement. They're the kind of composers whose much I really like to see live to just hear that electricity their music creates. I would really like to see Mendelssohn's Octet (such intense music from someone in their teens), but am gearing up to see a couple of his symphonies performed by the Sydney based Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra in their next season. I would maybe like to get a cd or two of Schumann's solo piano music at some stage, as I have liked what I have heard on radio from him in that department so far...

Leon

Quote from: Sid on November 10, 2010, 09:11:54 PM
Having recently seen two of these guys works recently in concert, I think I like them equally. I saw the lyrical and "wholly ravishing" (as Clara called it) Schumann Cello Concerto, and the Mendelssohn Piano Trio No. 2, whose finale struck me as such a grand and sublime statement. They're the kind of composers whose much I really like to see live to just hear that electricity their music creates. I would really like to see Mendelssohn's Octet (such intense music from someone in their teens), but am gearing up to see a couple of his symphonies performed by the Sydney based Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra in their next season. I would maybe like to get a cd or two of Schumann's solo piano music at some stage, as I have liked what I have heard on radio from him in that department so far...

It is interesting you use the verb "to see" instead of "to hear" music.  I know you mean you attended live performances, but it struck me as odd in an interesting way.  (I assure you I am not trying to be sarcastic or picky, I really found it unique.)

You only said "heard" when referring to a radio performance.

Does seeing the performers add to your enjoyment?  Or is it merely a euphemism for experiencing the music live and all the intangibles that includes, as opposed to hearing the same works on a CD or the radio?

Sid

Well, I did write "see" many times in that post! :D I suppose I like seeing the music being made before my eyes better than anything else. Of course the sound is more important than the view (I've been to venues where the view was great, but the sound not so good). But I think that I am not only aurally stimulated by music, but also visually by what's going on...

knight66

I am currently wading through sludge whilst rehearsing 'Elijah'. If for no other reason then: Schumann.

Though Mendy's goodies do pile up, especially his chamber music. But I do wish he had not gone down the route of romanticising Bach in his choral works. I once had a sight reading test where I was given about 20 pages of 'St Paul' to sing through. Dreck.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

Sergeant Rock

#53
Quote from: knight on November 13, 2010, 02:29:27 AM
I am currently wading through sludge whilst rehearsing 'Elijah'. If for no other reason then: Schumann.

Though Mendy's goodies do pile up, especially his chamber music. But I do wish he had not gone down the route of romanticising Bach in his choral works. I once had a sight reading test where I was given about 20 pages of 'St Paul' to sing through. Dreck.

Mike

I said earlier in this thread that "I can't think of a single piece by him that I don't love." But I haven't heard Elijah or St. Paul. Maybe I shouldn't  ;D

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

knight66

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on November 13, 2010, 08:27:53 AM
I said earlier in this thread that "I can't think of a single piece by him that I don't love." But I haven't heard Elijah or St. Paul. Maybe I shouldn't  ;D

Sarge

Good idea, though some folks do like both. They tend to sit round the walls of communal rooms in old people's homes and wet themselves on a regular basis. Not sure if there is a cause and effect there.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.