Brahms vs. Tchaikovsky!!!

Started by Ataraxia, July 27, 2012, 12:09:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pick one. No bananas here.

Brahms
Tchaikovsky

mc ukrneal

Quote from: springrite on August 01, 2012, 12:33:41 PM
In Blackjack, when you have two aces, the right thing to do is to split them...
In baseball you pitch them back to back (for the most part)...:)
Be kind to your fellow posters!!

Brahmsian

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on August 01, 2012, 12:16:32 PM
She's always been crazy for Dvorak...even likes the early stuff like the D minor Fourth.

Sarge

That's my favourite Dvorak symphony also!  :D

Cato

Quote from: ChamberNut on August 01, 2012, 03:07:30 PM
That's my favourite Dvorak symphony also!  :D

i.e.  Symphony #4, and yes, that and Symphony #3 probably have a greater play rate than the others.

Tchaikovsky beats Brahms because of the ballets, the operas, and the psychology of an atomic bomb.
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

eyeresist

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on August 01, 2012, 12:08:33 PMI asked Mrs. Rock to vote in the poll. She wanted to know the choices. Tchaikovsky or Brahms, says I. "Oh f--k," says she.

She wants the banana option...or Dvorak.

Wise woman, that.

Karl Henning

#44
Bananas & Dvorák!
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

eyeresist


Florestan

Tchams!... No, wait, Brahmkovsky!... ummmm, never mind.  ;D
"Beauty must appeal to the senses, must provide us with immediate enjoyment, must impress us or insinuate itself into us without any effort on our part." - Claude Debussy

Karl Henning

Quote from: eyeresist on August 01, 2012, 07:17:13 PM
... would make one hell of a daiquiri.

And all she wants to do is dance.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Ataraxia

I no longer use smilies so you might not know when I'm kidding. Just sayin'.

Karl Henning

Whatchoo take me fer? I entirely know when you're kidding.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Ataraxia

Quote from: karlhenning on August 02, 2012, 04:37:01 AM
Whatchoo take me fer? I entirely know when you're kidding.

That's because you're a stoot.

Brahmsian

Quote from: Cato on August 01, 2012, 04:10:54 PM


Tchaikovsky beats Brahms because of the ballets, the operas

That is true ~ probably only because Brahms never wrote any ballets and operas!  ;D

Also, for me, Tchaikovsky smokes Brahms in the symphony category.

But Brahms dominates all other categories (for me, personally)

Agomongo1235

Can't compare Brahms stood for following the rules Tchaikovsky stood for what sounded best.

Mirror Image

I admire both composers, but I love Tchaikovsky's music more.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Mirror Image on October 15, 2012, 06:03:51 PM
I admire both composers, but I love Tchaikovsky's music more.

Mn Dave was always cruel with his polls. Of the mere handful of post 1850 composers that I really like, these guys are in the Top 5. How can one choose?  :-\

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Mirror Image

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 15, 2012, 06:16:03 PM
Mn Dave was always cruel with his polls. Of the mere handful of post 1850 composers that I really like, these guys are in the Top 5. How can one choose?  :-\

8)

Well, for me, it just came down to personal preference (i. e. who I listened to more). Both composers are incredible, but this was an easy choice for me.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Mirror Image on October 15, 2012, 06:21:24 PM
Well, for me, it just came down to personal preference (i. e. who I listened to more). Both composers are incredible, but this was an easy choice for me.

Only easy for me if you don't count chamber or solo piano music, since I hold Brahms' chamber music in the highest esteem. Orchestral music is Tchaikovsky for sure. I have got the impression that you prefer orchestral music, so for you it would be easy.  :)

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Mirror Image

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 15, 2012, 06:32:10 PM
Only easy for me if you don't count chamber or solo piano music, since I hold Brahms' chamber music in the highest esteem. Orchestral music is Tchaikovsky for sure. I have got the impression that you prefer orchestral music, so for you it would be easy.  :)

8)

Well, Brahms wrote his fair share of incredible orchestral music. His four symphonies are outstanding as are his concerti. Then you have works like Tragic Overture, Haydn Variations, and Academic Festival Overture. Also, his choral works are unbelievably good: Ein Deutsches Requiem, Alto Rhapsody, Gesang Der Parzen, Schicksalslied, and Nanie. The guy was amazing, but in mood and temprament I prefer Tchaikovsky as I relate more to the fiery Russian spirit that permeates his music.

bigshot

This one is easy for me. Brahms is my least favorite German romantic, and Tchaikovsky is one of my favorite composers overall.

springrite

I really did not expect this poll to be even close.

Then again, MI puts it best: personal preferences, which needs no rationalization, justification, proof, evidence, etc.

BTW I picked Brahms by a mile, or rather, by a marathon distance.
Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.