Favorite Haydn Symphonies Cycle (incomplete)

Started by DavidW, October 14, 2012, 04:33:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

It doesn't have to be complete, but the majority have to be done

Fischer
3 (14.3%)
Dorati
3 (14.3%)
Hogwood
5 (23.8%)
Davies
2 (9.5%)
Fey
5 (23.8%)
Goodman
3 (14.3%)
Naxos (various conductors all under one label)
0 (0%)
Other
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 21

DavidW


Gurn Blanston

Goodman & Hogwood in a tie. Voted for Goodman but could have voted for Hogwood easily enough. Rather a difficult question, really. :-\

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

TheGSMoeller

Goodman's performances are wonderful, features some of my favorites (No.86 being one of them), I also really love Fischer's, (only one of these three to have recorded two of my absolute Haydn tops, No.80 and 98) and I have to give a huge nod to Fey, this forum seems to be quite split on his accounts, but I get more chills down my spine from these discs (No.39 and 44 first come to mind) than others, it's really difficult for me to pick one out of these three.


Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 14, 2012, 04:38:57 PM
Rather a difficult question, really. :-\

This.

But I voted Goodman, as an overall summation I think this is the way to go. I would miss Fey's intensity and Fischer's romantic qualities. But I'll play along and just pick one.

Bogey

There will never be another era like the Golden Age of Hollywood.  We didn't know how to blow up buildings then so we had no choice but to tell great stories with great characters.-Ben Mankiewicz

Leo K.

Since I heard one album from Hogwood's cycle, I guess it's Goodman!


Daverz


Wakefield

Hogwood, hands down. Kuijken when "completism" isn't a concern.
"Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."
- Almost Famous (2000)

Opus106

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 14, 2012, 04:38:57 PM
Voted for Goodman but could have voted for Hogwood easily enough.

I'm fairly certain that you must have gone over the reason once before (or more) in the forum, but could you please tell us, one more time, why you have chosen Goodman over Hogwood?




With the release of Lyre-bird box, I think it's a good opportunity for Hyperion (and us!) if they also release a box of Goodman's Haydn.
Regards,
Navneeth

marvinbrown



  Am I going to be the only person here to cast a vote for the Fischer cycle?? 

  Seriously for someone who has had a slight aversion to Haydn (I avoided him for many years!!) I can honestly say that ever since buying the Fischer Cycle I can not stop listening to it.  For that alone it deserves my vote......and what's to not to like:

  1) the set is COMPLETE
  2) sound quality is EXCELLENT
  3) fischer's interpretation emphasizes the LYRICAL (this suites me just fine)
 

  marvin

DavidW


DavidW

Quote from: marvinbrown on October 15, 2012, 01:03:20 AM

  Am I going to be the only person here to cast a vote for the Fischer cycle?? 


I'm surprised too, I thought the forum would vote for Fischer.  Now I know what I'm preordering from jpc... Hogwood!  Well I'll let more people vote in.

springrite

Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.

Sergeant Rock

#12
Fischer for completeness (and price). Fey for interpretive uniqueness and fire (and, fingers crossed, eventual completion)--gets my vote. I really like Hogwood too but there is no Stumbling Goat or Cat, and never will be  :(

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Karl Henning

This thread is reminding me that I have yet to finish listening to the Fischer cycle . . . .
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: karlhenning on October 15, 2012, 04:12:19 AM
This thread is reminding me that I have yet to finish listening to the Fischer cycle . . . .

Not surprising...there is a lot to listen to  :)

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Opus106 on October 15, 2012, 12:49:48 AM
I'm fairly certain that you must have gone over the reason once before (or more) in the forum, but could you please tell us, one more time, why you have chosen Goodman over Hogwood?




With the release of Lyre-bird box, I think it's a good opportunity for Hyperion (and us!) if they also release a box of Goodman's Haydn.

I picked individual performances when I was choosing symphonies, not cycles. I like that the Hogwood has more music in it, the more the merrier for MY money! In the early symphonies, where the band isn't but a dozen players or so, Hogwood's eschewing of continuo shows up as a negative for me. That's why most of my early choices are Goodman and Solomons. Later on, of course this matters far less as you can scarcely hear it anyway. But there is a lot more competition then too. So, in sum, mainly because of the super job Goodman does with the early works. :)

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

DavidRoss

I don't have one and don't know any well enough to offer a meaningful opinion. As a fan of HIP period instrument performance, I'm partial to the late symphonies recordings I have by Kuijken, Minkowski, and Brüggen, but none are close to complete. Guess I need to hear some Goodman & Hogwood, neither of whom usually appeal much to me (where's the 'ugh' emoticon?).
"Maybe the problem most of you have ... is that you're not listening to Barbirolli." ~Sarge

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher

Scarpia

Fey!  (Then Harnoncourt, although I do not know if he reached the 50% level with his Concertgebouw and CMW recordings).

Karl Henning

Quote from: Sergeant Rock on October 15, 2012, 04:15:12 AM
Not surprising...there is a lot to listen to  :)

Aye, Sarge, which is one of the Good Things.  Probably take me a little bit of researching even to find out where I left off in my chronological survey . . . of I could just start from the beginning again . . . .
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 15, 2012, 04:15:22 AMSo, in sum, mainly because of the super job Goodman does with the early works. :)

I could do some research and find the answer....but you probably have it readily at hand: how many symphonies did Goodman complete before they pulled the plug on his cycle? I own 25 (1-5, 17-21, 45-47, 70-78, 90-92) but I know there are more.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"