Vaughan Williams's Veranda

Started by karlhenning, April 12, 2007, 06:03:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

aukhawk

I find the Hickox recording to be just too diffuse.  Too much fog.  It's a bygone age, there hasn't been a proper London fog since 1963 (I know, I was there).

563172...8...49

Parsifal

Quote from: aukhawk on November 21, 2017, 08:47:46 AM
I find the Hickox recording to be just too diffuse.  Too much fog.

That's my general reaction to Hickox' Vaughan Williams recordings. Maybe I will get the new recording of the 1920 version for an appreciation of V-W's original conception of the A London Symphony.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on November 21, 2017, 05:43:16 AM
:o I'm surprised to see A Pastoral Symphony so low on your list, Jeffrey.
I love all the symphonies. Haitink's recording of 'A Sea Symphony' was a revelation to me although the best music is definitely in the last movement. I think that I play No.3 less than the others but it is a great score and, of course, I respect the views of those who consider it to be RVW's greatest. I used to play it more, especially the Boult Decca and Previn RCA versions. The Elder is fine too. I'm fascinated by the 'Scott of the Antarctic' heroic disaster story so I rate Sinfonia Antartica higher than many. No.8 is the most underrated IMHO.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

Quote from: aukhawk on November 21, 2017, 08:47:46 AM
I find the Hickox recording to be just too diffuse.  Too much fog.  It's a bygone age, there hasn't been a proper London fog since 1963 (I know, I was there).

563172...8...49

I was there too  :)
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

Quote from: Scarpia on November 21, 2017, 08:50:09 AM
That's my general reaction to Hickox' Vaughan Williams recordings. Maybe I will get the new recording of the 1920 version for an appreciation of V-W's original conception of the A London Symphony.

The new Hyperion is a great performance and there are some interesting shorter works.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

SymphonicAddict

Quote from: Christo on November 20, 2017, 09:39:13 PM
Haha! Mine something like:
3, 6, 9, 5, 8, 4, 7, 2, 1
or, almost mirroring your order.  :D

Yes, almost a mirror of my preferences. Nothing less than curious  :D

Karl Henning

Quote from: vandermolen on November 21, 2017, 02:17:48 PM
I love all the symphonies. Haitink's recording of 'A Sea Symphony' was a revelation to me although the best music is definitely in the last movement. I think that I play No.3 less than the others but it is a great score and, of course, I respect the views of those who consider it to be RVW's greatest. I used to play it more, especially the Boult Decca and Previn RCA versions. The Elder is fine too. I'm fascinated by the 'Scott of the Antarctic' heroic disaster story so I rate Sinfonia Antartica higher than many. No.8 is the most underrated IMHO.

I rate the Sinfonia antartica higher than many, too.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

relm1

#2867
Quote from: vandermolen on November 21, 2017, 02:17:48 PM
I love all the symphonies. Haitink's recording of 'A Sea Symphony' was a revelation to me although the best music is definitely in the last movement. I think that I play No.3 less than the others but it is a great score and, of course, I respect the views of those who consider it to be RVW's greatest. I used to play it more, especially the Boult Decca and Previn RCA versions. The Elder is fine too. I'm fascinated by the 'Scott of the Antarctic' heroic disaster story so I rate Sinfonia Antartica higher than many. No.8 is the most underrated IMHO.

I agree with this.  RVW is one of the greatest symphonists ever because of his consistency in the extremely high quality of each symphony he composed while not repeating himself.  Same with Beethoven, Sibelius, Mahler, etc. Every one was a home run though unique unto themselves.  Unique and distinctive yet characteristic of their creator's unique identity.  I love them all.  I have also found that his symphonies benefit from greater breadth/broader tempo in general.  With RVM, the music is greater than the notes. 

By the way, I just finished listening to Chandos/Bryden Thompson's excellent performance of No. 7 "Sinfonia Antartica" and found it very good but it doesn't displace Andre Previn or Adrian Boult for me.  Those have a special "other worldliness" quality that no one else can match. 

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on November 21, 2017, 02:17:48 PM
I love all the symphonies. Haitink's recording of 'A Sea Symphony' was a revelation to me although the best music is definitely in the last movement. I think that I play No.3 less than the others but it is a great score and, of course, I respect the views of those who consider it to be RVW's greatest. I used to play it more, especially the Boult Decca and Previn RCA versions. The Elder is fine too. I'm fascinated by the 'Scott of the Antarctic' heroic disaster story so I rate Sinfonia Antartica higher than many. No.8 is the most underrated IMHO.

Ah, I see. I agree that Symphony No. 8 is underrated, but what wonderful, otherworldly textures that make their way into this work. This symphony, at one point, was my number one favorite from RVW, but each time I hear the 5th, it reminds of why it'll always remain my absolute favorite.

Christo

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 21, 2017, 02:44:07 PMI rate the Sinfonia antartica higher than many, too.
The point is not, that we don't admire the Antartica deeply - but that the 'absolute' symphonies are even finer.
... music is not only an 'entertainment', nor a mere luxury, but a necessity of the spiritual if not of the physical life, an opening of those magic casements through which we can catch a glimpse of that country where ultimate reality will be found.    RVW, 1948

vandermolen

Quote from: relm1 on November 21, 2017, 04:12:35 PM
I agree with this.  RVW is one of the greatest symphonists ever because of his consistency in the extremely high quality of each symphony he composed while not repeating himself.  Same with Beethoven, Sibelius, Mahler, etc. Every one was a home run though unique unto themselves.  Unique and distinctive yet characteristic of their creator's unique identity.  I love them all.  I have also found that his symphonies benefit from greater breadth/broader tempo in general.  With RVM, the music is greater than the notes. 

By the way, I just finished listening to Chandos/Bryden Thompson's excellent performance of No. 7 "Sinfonia Antartica" and found it very good but it doesn't displace Andre Previn or Adrian Boult for me.  Those have a special "other worldliness" quality that no one else can match.
Coincidentally I listened to the Bryden Thomson 'Antartica' yesterday and enjoyed it as I enjoy all his VW performances. The Good CD Guide to top 1000 CDs recommended his No.6 as their top choice. I think that Boult (Decca) is in a class of his own for Sinfonia Antartica. After all, he had VW in the studio with him. Boult's objective way with VW really suits the Antartica as it does with No.6.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

Quote from: Christo on November 21, 2017, 09:28:31 PM
The point is not, that we don't admire the Antartica deeply - but that the 'absolute' symphonies are even finer.
I agree.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on November 21, 2017, 06:28:08 PM
Ah, I see. I agree that Symphony No. 8 is underrated, but what wonderful, otherworldly textures that make their way into this work. This symphony, at one point, was my number one favorite from RVW, but each time I hear the 5th, it reminds of why it'll always remain my absolute favorite.

No.5 has a strong case to be considered the greatest - the most Sibelian too and dedicated to the great Finn. I like the recently discovered performance conducted by VW, although I know that you are not keen on historic recordings. Barbirolli's EMI version is a wonderfully warm-hearted account.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Mirror Image

Quote from: vandermolen on November 22, 2017, 12:17:20 AM
No.5 has a strong case to be considered the greatest - the most Sibelian too and dedicated to the great Finn. I like the recently discovered performance conducted by VW, although I know that you are not keen on historic recordings. Barbirolli's EMI version is a wonderfully warm-hearted account.

Oh yes, there is a strong Sibelian influence in this symphony, but it's obviously filtered through RVW's own musical sensibility and, most importantly, his heart. My favorite performance is Previn's on RCA. I think he gets all of the elements 'right' in this symphony, which, sometimes, doesn't always happen in many other performances I've heard.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on November 22, 2017, 05:40:35 AM
Oh yes, there is a strong Sibelian influence in this symphony, but it's obviously filtered through RVW's own musical sensibility and, most importantly, his heart. My favorite performance is Previn's on RCA. I think he gets all of the elements 'right' in this symphony, which, sometimes, doesn't always happen in many other performances I've heard.
Previn's RCA recording is a great one. I think there is an argument that his recordings of symphonies 2 (1936), 3, 5 and 8 are the best available. I do not know of a better version of 3 or 8 and rank his version of A London Symphony alongside Boult and Barbirolli's EMI versions.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Archaic Torso of Apollo

Quote from: vandermolen on November 21, 2017, 02:17:48 PM
. No.8 is the most underrated IMHO.

I love the 8th too - the 80+ years old VW making a holiday for himself. One of the best "lite" symphonies of the century, IMHO.

BTW I think I mentioned this before, but the structure and instrumentation of the 8th is very similar to Hindemith's Symphonia Serena, which had been composed a few years before. I wonder if it was an influence on VW, whether consciously or not.

There was a local performance of the 8th a few years ago, but sadly I missed it.
formerly VELIMIR (before that, Spitvalve)

"Who knows not strict counterpoint, lives and dies an ignoramus" - CPE Bach

Sergeant Rock

#2876
Quote from: vandermolen on November 22, 2017, 06:15:20 AM
Previn's RCA recording is a great one. I do not know of a better version of 3 or 8

While I agree that Previn's Third is a great one, the last time I did a comparative listening of the versions of 8 that I own, Previn and Rozh came out dead last. I think the problem with Previn, to my ears. was the quality of the recording more than the performance  In any case, I'll give it another try to see if I can understand why you rate it so highly.

Edit: Listening to it now. The sound, which is fine, is not the problem.

My current faves are Thomson, Haitink and Boult (EMI). They all have a relatively slow first movement.

Stokowski/BBC SO       12:46    2:59   9:39   4:51
Thomson/LSO              12:22    4:00   8:08   5:39
Haitink/LPO                 11:22    3:39   9:45   5:45
Boult/LPO EMI             11:09    3:55   8:35   4:44
Boult/LPO Decca          11:06    3:54   8:04   5:01
Bakels                         10:51    3:47   8:45   5:02
Davis/BBC                   10:46    3:36   8:27   5:16
Handley/RLPO              10:39    4:07   7:50   4:46
Previn/LSO                  10:15    3:42   9:22   5:15   
Barbirolli/Halle             10:10    3:37   7:43   4:59
Slatkin/Philharmonia     10:10    3:31   7:59   4:47   
Rozhdestvensky MofC     9:58    3:30   8:49   5:55

Sarge

the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"

Karl Henning

Quote from: Christo on November 21, 2017, 09:28:31 PM
The point is not, that we don't admire the Antartica deeply - but that the 'absolute' symphonies are even finer.

Fair enough.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Mirror Image

Quote from: Archaic Torso of Apollo on November 22, 2017, 11:31:36 AM
I love the 8th too - the 80+ years old VW making a holiday for himself. One of the best "lite" symphonies of the century, IMHO.

BTW I think I mentioned this before, but the structure and instrumentation of the 8th is very similar to Hindemith's Symphonia Serena, which had been composed a few years before. I wonder if it was an influence on VW, whether consciously or not.

There was a local performance of the 8th a few years ago, but sadly I missed it.

I seriously doubt that Hindemith was a influence. I mean RVW wasn't exactly smitten with the Germans the best to my memory. I seem to recall he had some negative things to say about Mahler. But this doesn't bother me nor should it bother anyone else, there are a lot of composers who say negative things about other composers all through history.

vandermolen

Quote from: Mirror Image on November 22, 2017, 04:37:29 PM
I seriously doubt that Hindemith was a influence. I mean RVW wasn't exactly smitten with the Germans the best to my memory. I seem to recall he had some negative things to say about Mahler. But this doesn't bother me nor should it bother anyone else, there are a lot of composers who say negative things about other composers all through history.
I have a feeling that I read somewhere that VW liked Hindemith's music but I might be quite wrong about this.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).