VW, Elgar, Walton, Britten and Holst: rank in the order you prefer

Started by kyjo, August 25, 2013, 05:19:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kyjo

Picking up where my favorite British composer poll excluding these five left off......

1. VW. He will always be my numero uno Brit. There's such depth and humanity in all of his music, whether it be the lyrical outpurings of the Tallis Fantasia and Symphony no. 5 or the searing power and drive of Symphonies 4 and 6.

2. Elgar. His music doesn't reveal all its secrets on first hearing, and that is one of the things I love most about it. Both of the symphonies and the violin and cello concertos are magnificently noble and powerful works. I also love his more extroverted side, as shown in the Wand of Youth Suites and the glorious In the South. I rank him behind RVW simply because there are more works by RVW than Elgar that I love.

3. Walton. His music is quite inspiring in its lyrical vigor. His Symphony no. 1, Belshazzar's Feast and the string concertos are works I would not want to be without. I rank him behind VW and Elgar because his music doesn't leave as much of a lasting impression on me as the above composers'.

4. Britten. He is a composer I have never been able to connect with fully. I very much like the piano and violin concertos, Sinfonia da requiem, Young Apollo, Frank Bridge Variations, Simple Symphony, Four Sea Interludes and the Guide, but works such as the War Requiem, Cello Symphony and Spring Symphony leave me cold. Despite the fact that I enjoy a number of his works, he's not a composer I find myself returning to that often. I just don't think he had that strong of an individual voice.

5. Holst. He is a strange bird. The Planets is one of my all-time favorite pieces of classical music. But, apart from the St. Paul's Suite and the ballet suite from The Perfect Fool, I can't express much enthusiasm for the rest of his output. Why couldn't he continue writing in the visionary, viscerally exciting style of The Planets? Works such as the First Choral Symphony and the Cotswold Symphony pretty much bore me to tears. Why, Holst, why?

Now, let's hear from you! :)

TheGSMoeller


Mirror Image


Mirror Image

Quote from: kyjo on August 25, 2013, 05:19:27 PM4. Britten. He is a composer I have never been able to connect with fully. I very much like the piano and violin concertos, Sinfonia da requiem, Young Apollo, Frank Bridge Variations, Simple Symphony, Four Sea Interludes and the Guide, but works such as the War Requiem, Cello Symphony and Spring Symphony leave me cold. Despite the fact that I enjoy a number of his works, he's not a composer I find myself returning to that often. I just don't think he had that strong of an individual voice.

The bolded texts is what left me very surprised. Britten has as much as a distinctive voice as RVW or Elgar. I think you should really reconsider this opinion. It's one thing to not enjoy the man's music fully but it's another matter completely to say he didn't have a unique compositional persona.

kyjo

Quote from: Mirror Image on August 25, 2013, 05:44:57 PM
The bolded texts is what left me very surprised. Britten has as much as a distinctive voice as RVW or Elgar. I think you should really reconsider this opinion. It's one thing to not enjoy the man's music fully but it's another matter completely to say he didn't have a unique compositional persona.

Yeah, I knew that comment would be controversial (which I sort of intended it to be)! OK, he did have a unique voice, but it's not an easily recognizable one. He doesn't come out and hit you in the face with his personality like Wagner, Mahler, Schoenberg, Stravinsky etc. and there's nothing inherently wrong with that. :) But it's not often that I'm listening to a piece of his and think in my mind "Oh, that section is so Britten-esque!"

Mirror Image

Quote from: kyjo on August 25, 2013, 05:56:51 PM
Yeah, I knew that comment would be controversial (which I sort of intended it to be)! OK, he did have a unique voice, but it's not an easily recognizable one. He doesn't come out and hit you in the face with his personality like Wagner, Mahler, Schoenberg, Stravinsky etc. and there's nothing inherently wrong with that. :) But it's not often that I'm listening to a piece of his music and think in my mind "Oh, that section is so Britten-esque!"

Then who could have written Serenade, Les Illuminations, the War Requiem, Peter Grimes, etc.? Every work Britten composed has his individual stamp on it whether it was an opera, a choral work, an orchestral suite, etc. I don't think your comment is controversial, I just don't think it's firmly rooted in what Britten was actually about as a composer. Musical styles don't have to come right out and hit you, but they reveal themselves over a lot of serious listening.

Sammy

1.  Vaughan Williams
2.  Walton
3.  Britten
4.  Elgar
5.  Holst

Archaic Torso of Apollo

1. VW
2. Elgar
3. Walton
4. Holst
5. Britten

I don't get what's the big whoop about Britten, so he goes last. Picking between Elgar and VW for the top slot is difficult - I went with VW because of his greater range of expression, but that's just how I feel today.

Walton is superb in the works I like, but there aren't that many of them. He should have composed more. As for Holst, I love The Planets and Egdon Heath, but nothing else I've heard.
formerly VELIMIR (before that, Spitvalve)

"Who knows not strict counterpoint, lives and dies an ignoramus" - CPE Bach

Dancing Divertimentian

Quote from: Velimir on August 25, 2013, 06:24:57 PM
I don't get what's the big whoop about Britten, so he goes last. Picking between Elgar and VW for the top slot is difficult - I went with VW because of his greater range of expression, but that's just how I feel today.

And I've never gotten what the big whoop is about RWV. :D

It's Britten for me by a landslide.

Veit Bach-a baker who found his greatest pleasure in a little cittern which he took with him even into the mill and played while the grinding was going on. In this way he had a chance to have the rhythm drilled into him. And this was the beginning of a musical inclination in his descendants. JS Bach

North Star

1. Britten
2. RVW
3. Elgar
4. Holst
5. Walton

Need to hear more Walton, though.
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

vandermolen

"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

Lisztianwagner

1. Holst
2. Elgar
3. Britten
4. Vaughan Williams
5. Walton

But I need to get to know Walton's music better.....
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

North Star

Quote from: Lisztianwagner on August 26, 2013, 02:17:07 AM
1. Holst
2. Elgar
3. Britten
4. Vaughan Williams
5. Walton

But I need to get to know Walton's music better.....
Wow, didn't realize you like Holst enough to put him first here, Ilaria!
What are some of your favourites from him, say 5-10 works?
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

mc ukrneal

Hard choices. I like all of them, but when forced to choose:
Elgar
Holst
Britten
Walton
Vaughan Williams
Be kind to your fellow posters!!

dyn

Quote from: kyjo on August 25, 2013, 05:19:27 PM
5. Holst. He is a strange bird. The Planets is one of my all-time favorite pieces of classical music. But, apart from the St. Paul's Suite and the ballet suite from The Perfect Fool, I can't express much enthusiasm for the rest of his output. Why couldn't he continue writing in the visionary, viscerally exciting style of The Planets? Works such as the First Choral Symphony and the Cotswold Symphony pretty much bore me to tears. Why, Holst, why?

The Planets aren't actually that different from most of the rest of his music apart from being louder and longer. If you enjoy them you'd probably enjoy at least the Fugal Overture, the Suites for military band/orchestra, Indra, etc as well. Personally i like Hammersmith and Egdon Heath the best, but they are some of the least Planets-like music he wrote.

i don't listen to most of these people too often (and wouldn't put any of them in my "top 20" for british composers) but these are the order i'd pick
- VW Symphonies 5 and 3, last movement of Symphony 6
- Walton Concertos, Symphony 2
- Britten Serenade, Illuminations, Nocturne, String Quartet 2
- VW other symphonies, orchestra music and Job
- Holst Hammersmith, Egdon Heath, concertante works
- Britten orchestra music, String Quartet 3
- Walton chamber music & remaining orchestra music
- Holst Planets
- other Holst i've heard
- Britten piano & other chamber music
- Elgar

i don't know any of VW's chamber music, very much music by Holst or Elgar, or choral music by any of the above composers. i know Britten perhaps the best but not any of the operas. Belshazzar's Feast is one of those things i always meant to get around to listening to but never did.

Lisztianwagner

Quote from: North Star on August 26, 2013, 02:31:26 AM
Wow, didn't realize you like Holst enough to put him first here, Ilaria!
What are some of your favourites from him, say 5-10 works?

I absolutely love his music, I could easily put Holst in my top 15 composers. :)
Some of my favourites, in no specific order:

The Planets
Egdon Heath
A Somerset Rhapsody
Two Songs without Words
The Golden Goose
The Cloud Messenger
St. Paul's Suite
A Choral Fantasia
Capriccio
Lyric Movement
Choral Hymns
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

North Star

Quote from: Lisztianwagner on August 26, 2013, 05:01:06 AM
I absolutely love his music, I could easily put Holst in my top 15 composers. :)
Some of my favourites, in no specific order:

The Planets
Egdon Heath
A Somerset Rhapsody

Two Songs without Words
The Golden Goose
The Cloud Messenger
St. Paul's Suite
A Choral Fantasia
Capriccio
Lyric Movement
Choral Hymns

Thanks for the list, I think I'll listen to some Holst now. :)
The ones I have (in the 4 disc EMI box) are bolded. Egdon Heath is great stuff, for sure.
"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr

Lisztianwagner

Quote from: North Star on August 26, 2013, 05:12:48 AM
Thanks for the list, I think I'll listen to some Holst now. :)
The ones I have (in the 4 disc EMI box) are bolded. Egdon Heath is great stuff, for shure.

Very glad to hear that. :)
It's great stuff indeed, what a gorgeous, hauntingly beautiful work! Holst himself thought Egdon Heath was his best composition.
"You cannot expect the Form before the Idea, for they will come into being together." - Arnold Schönberg

springrite

Do what I must do, and let what must happen happen.