Pieces that don't sound like their subtitles

Started by kyjo, October 17, 2013, 04:51:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kyjo

Just a few that come to mind:

Wellesz: Symphony no. 2 English (a fine work in the Bruckner/Mahler tradition)
Rootham: Symphony no. 2 Apocalyptic
Weigl: Symphony no. 5 Apocalyptic (rather disappointing after the apocalyptic opening)
Orthel: Symphony no. 2 Sinfonia Piccola
Chavez: Symphony no. 4 Sinfonia romantica
Schubert: Symphony no. 4 Tragic (only the opening is truly "tragic")

What others?




jochanaan

Brahms' Fourth Symphony was at one time called the "Tragic," but it has never sounded tragic to me despite ending in the minor.
Imagination + discipline = creativity

Brian

Quote from: kyjo on October 17, 2013, 04:51:30 PM
Schubert: Symphony no. 4 Tragic (only the opening is truly "tragic")

I've always described Kalliwoda's Fifth to people as "if Schubert's Tragic symphony was actually Tragic."

Quote from: jochanaan on October 17, 2013, 04:54:06 PM
Brahms' Fourth Symphony was at one time called the "Tragic," but it has never sounded tragic to me despite ending in the minor.

Funny, I think of that piece as almost Shakespearean! Folks do hear things differently. :)

-

Almost all the bogus Bruckner symphony nicknames fit in here. My mom hates the Strauss title "Death and Transfiguration," because "why should he contain our imaginations like that? To me it didn't sound like it at all. I don't like having to think, 'oh, this part's about death.' That's boring."

Brahmsian

Schubert:  Symphony No. 8 in B minor "Unfinished"

For me, it sounds as complete as can be.  Schubert Symphony No. 8, you complete me:D

TheGSMoeller

Quote from: ChamberNut on October 17, 2013, 05:00:34 PM
Schubert:  Symphony No. 8 in B minor "Unfinished"

For me, it sounds as complete as can be.  Schubert Symphony No. 8, you complete me:D

I agree, Ray, I wouldn't want it any other way at this point.


amw

Ezra Sims's "String Quartet No. 2 (1962)" is neither a string quartet nor written in 1962. I suppose that was intentional though. Milton Babbitt also has some sextets for violin and piano.

I think Sorabji's Symphonia brevis is, in fact, 90 minutes long. It's only a "short" symphony compared to his other ones.

Brahmsian

Prokofiev's 2nd, 3rd and 6th symphonies.

Yes, they do not have sub-titles.  However, they should!  Steel toed boot kick in the ass 1-2-3  ;D

TheGSMoeller

Quote from: ChamberNut on October 17, 2013, 05:18:22 PM
Prokofiev's 2nd, 3rd and 6th symphonies.

Yes, they do not have sub-titles.  However, they should!  Steel toed boot kick in the ass 1-2-3  ;D

I though the 3rd was titled, "Throw Them in the Fire!!"  >:D  ;D

Karl Henning

Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

DavidW

Mahler's Titan might have been for it's time, but is lilliputian compared to say Brian's Gothic symphony.

DaveF

With apologies to any Danes reading this, Det Uudslukkelige (the word, not the wonderful symphony) sounds like two giant amphibians wrestling in a pool of slime.
"All the world is birthday cake" - George Harrison

vandermolen

"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).

relm1

MacMillans "Vigil" symphony doesn't sound like the eve before a religious observance.
I think Mahler's "tragic" might better be called "manic"...but in fairness I think it wasn't him who named it.

Parsifal

Quote from: ChamberNut on October 17, 2013, 05:00:34 PM
Schubert:  Symphony No. 8 in B minor "Unfinished"

For me, it sounds as complete as can be.  Schubert Symphony No. 8, you complete me:D

I think the first movement stands alone as one of the best "overtures" of the 19th century.  The two movement form strikes me as an incomplete creation, although I like the second movement as a stand-alone piece.

Pat B

Quote from: TheGSMoeller on October 17, 2013, 05:10:15 PM
I agree, Ray, I wouldn't want it any other way at this point.

I have the "completed" version performed by OAE with Mackerras (they resisted the temptation to call it the "Finished"). It may be close to what Schubert was working on, but my hunch is that Schubert decided against the latter movements. It certainly works well as a 2-movement piece.

kishnevi

Quote from: DavidW on October 17, 2013, 05:56:13 PM
Mahler's Titan might have been for it's time, but is lilliputian compared to say Brian's Gothic symphony.

That name, which Mahler dropped rather quickly, came from a popular 19th century novel, and had nothing do with size.

Come to think of it,  I don't think there's anything particularly "gothic" about Brian's First.

DavidW

Quote from: Jeffrey Smith on October 18, 2013, 01:46:09 PM
That name, which Mahler dropped rather quickly, came from a popular 19th century novel, and had nothing do with size.


That's rather vague, if you know the full story, would you mind posting it?

kishnevi

#17
Quote from: DavidW on October 18, 2013, 07:01:42 PM
That's rather vague, if you know the full story, would you mind posting it?

Wikipedia is very concise:
QuoteFor the 1893 Hamburg and 1894 Weimar performances, Mahler gave the piece the title Titan after the novel by Jean Paul, although Mahler specified that the piece was not in any way "about" the book; the nickname is often used today, but properly only applies to those two versions and should not be used in connection with the definitive final version.

And this more fully:
QuoteTitle

From the outset, Mahler almost always referred to this work in his correspondence as a symphony, but other sources employ a number of different titles which imply rather fluid allegiances to the genres of symphony and symphonic poem:

a) 1889 (handbill for première): Symphoniai költemény két részben [Symphonic Poem in two parts]

b) 1891 (letter to G.F. Kogel): 'symphonic poem in two parts entitled "Aus dem Leben eines Einsamen"'

b) 1893 (ACF2): Symphonie (,,Titan")  in 5 Sätzen (2 Abtheilungen)

c) 1893 (concert announcement and programme): 'Titan'. Eine Tondichtung in Symphonieform

d) 1894 (concert programme): Titan. Symphonie in zwei Abtheilungen und fünf Sätzen

e) 1896 (ACF3): Symphonie Nro 1

f) 1896 (concert handbill): Symphonie in D-dur für grosses Orchester

g) 1899 (first edition of the full score): SYMPHONIE No 1 in D-dur

The current publicists' fad for using the title 'Titan' for performances and recordings of the published score, is to be deprecated as anachronistic.
(from http://www.cph.rcm.ac.uk/MahlerCat/pages/Symph1/Symph1.htm-- and see further down the page for quotes relevant to what exactly Mahler meant by referring to the novel, and even if he meant to refer to the novel by using its title).

DavidW

Thanks Jeffrey.  I hoped that the story would be more interesting than that.  It seems like a silly way to name a symphony!  I recently read and like Carrion Comfort.  Imagine if I wrote a symphony and just slapped that title on it! :P

North Star

"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." - Confucius

My photographs on Flickr