Favourite Symphony 2

Started by vandermolen, April 18, 2015, 12:21:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ahinton

#100
Mahler and Sibelius seem to come first - but then Krenek, Dutilleux, Schmidt, Brian, Furtwängler, Elgar, Szymanowski, Magnard, Tippett, Rachmaninoff, Suk...

Does Carter's Symphonia: sum fluxæ pretium spei (written more than half a century after his official "Symphony No. 1") count?

ritter

Quote from: ahinton on November 20, 2016, 10:38:51 AM
Mahler and Sibelius seem to come first - but then Krenek, Dutilleux, Schmidt, Brian, Furtwängler, Szymanowski, Magnard, Tippett, Rachmaninoff, Suk...

Does Carter's Symphonia: sum fluxæ pretium spei (written more than half a century after his official "Symphony No. 1") count?
I'd say the Symphonia would technically be Carter's "Third", as you have A Symphony of Three Orchestra's from the mid-70s (a work that IMHO could qualify for this thread--I myself voted it's opening as one of the "most beautiful" in the other poll being held to that effect  ;) ).

ComposerOfAvantGarde

Ah yes A Symphony of Three Orchestras is very good

71 dB

Spatial distortion is a serious problem deteriorating headphone listening.
Crossfeeders reduce spatial distortion and make the sound more natural
and less tiresome in headphone listening.

My Sound Cloud page <-- NEW Jan. 2024 "Harpeggiator"

ahinton

Quote from: ritter on November 20, 2016, 10:42:53 AM
I'd say the Symphonia would technically be Carter's "Third", as you have A Symphony of Three Orchestra's from the mid-70s (a work that IMHO could qualify for this thread--I myself voted it's opening as one of the "most beautiful" in the other poll being held to that effect  ;) ).
Fair comment though, like his champion Stravinsky, he numbered only his first symphony and it might also be argued as to what meaning of the term "symphony" Carter had in mind when writing A Symphony of Three Orchestras. I also think that Symphonia: sum fluxæ pretium spei resembles what one might think of as a symphony far more than does A Symphony of Three Orchestras; it's his most monumental nd monumentally brilliant orchestral achievement, I believe and, whilst I would not think of it as his "Symphony No. 2" per se, it could reasonably be considered thus.

Karl Henning

Quote from: ahinton on November 21, 2016, 01:03:04 AM
Fair comment though, like his champion Stravinsky, he numbered only his first symphony and it might also be argued as to what meaning of the term "symphony" Carter had in mind when writing A Symphony of Three Orchestras. I also think that Symphonia: sum fluxæ pretium spei resembles what one might think of as a symphony far more than does A Symphony of Three Orchestras; it's his most monumental nd monumentally brilliant orchestral achievement, I believe and, whilst I would not think of it as his "Symphony No. 2" per se, it could reasonably be considered thus.

You put a good case.
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

SymphonicAddict

Favourite? It's difficult. I have some possible choices:

Brahms
Sibelius
Vaughan Williams (maybe the best 2nd symphony for me)
Mahler
Atterberg
Prokofiev
Tchaikovsky
Schumann (a strong candidate, too)
Rachmaninov
Elgar
Suk

ComposerOfAvantGarde

Quote from: jessop on November 12, 2016, 06:46:08 PM
Hmmmm

Mahler
Shostakovich
Sibelius
Maxwell Davies
Lutosławski
Beethoven
Honegger
Schubert
Knussen
Glass
Stravinsky

I was thinking about including Henze but it isn't really one of my favourites from him anyway

I gotta add Pärt to this list!

Rons_talking

#108
Brahms
Boradine
Diamond
Piston
Barber
whoops! I forgot Honegger...

Ken B

Quote from: Thatfabulousalien on December 13, 2016, 05:00:10 PM
There are a few for me, like the Korndorf and the Mahler, also Charles Ives'.
I know I'm missing stuff, I need to do a little searching around to find what I'm forgetting, what about Schoenberg's (chamber) symphony #2?
Well worth exploring.


RebLem

"Don't drink and drive; you might spill it."--J. Eugene Baker, aka my late father.

Karl Henning

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on November 07, 2016, 06:03:05 AM
Well, I see that I affirmed the Prokofiev, but without (I think) actually listing 6 choices of my own.

So let us try:

Prokofiev Op.40
Bernstein Age of Anxiety
Rakhmaninov Op.27
Elgar Op.63
Martinů
Sibelius Op.43


None of the above is at all disqualified, but I have had to formalize a revision:

Prokofiev Op.40
Bernstein Age of Anxiety
Rakhmaninov Op.27
Gallagher Ascendant
Martinů
Sibelius Op.43
Karl Henning, Ph.D.
Composer & Clarinetist
Boston MA
http://www.karlhenning.com/
[Matisse] was interested neither in fending off opposition,
nor in competing for the favor of wayward friends.
His only competition was with himself. — Françoise Gilot

Ken B

My list is above I think but I do want at least one passing mention here of Mysterious Mountain, by Hovhaness.

Madiel

Yikes, this is quite a tricky number...

Holmboe
Beethoven
Schumann (as of today, though of course not really his 2nd)
Nielsen (as of, last week?)


Plenty of other good candidates not far behind. I think a "Symphony 2" listening project would be a viable thing.
Every single post on the forum is unnecessary. Including the ones that are interesting or useful.

kyjo

#115
Top 10:

Sibelius
Rachmaninoff
Elgar
RVW
Mahler
Hanson
Atterberg
Tubin
Weill
Scriabin

Honorable mentions (there are so many 2nd symphonies that I love):

Arnold
Walton
Britten (Sinfonia da requiem)
Schubert
Schumann
Nielsen
Prokofiev
Borodin
Rimsky-Korsakov (Antar)
Braga Santos
Piston
Tippett
Honegger
Lyatoshinsky
Kalinnikov
Khachaturian
Yoshimatsu
Ries
Andreae (Symphony in C)
Schmidt
Lajtha
Martinu
Peterson-Berger
Alwyn


"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music" - Sergei Rachmaninoff

André

Excellent choices, all:

Quote from: kyjo on October 21, 2017, 09:08:49 AM
Top 10:

Sibelius
Rachmaninoff
Elgar
RVW
Mahler
Hanson
Atterberg
Tubin
Weill
Arnold

Honorable mentions (there are so many 2nd symphonies that I love):

Walton
Britten (Sinfonia da requiem)
Schubert
Schumann
Nielsen
Prokofiev
Borodin
Rimsky-Korsakov (Antar)
Braga Santos
Piston
Tippett
Honegger
Lyatoshinsky
Kalinnikov
Khachaturian
Yoshimatsu
Ries
Andreae (Symphony in C)
Schmidt
Lajtha
Martinu
Peterson-Berger
Alwyn


To which I would add:

Tchaikovsky
Roussel
Popov
Kancheli
Liszt (the Dante symphony)
Norholm

kyjo

Quote from: André on October 21, 2017, 12:43:32 PM
Excellent choices, all:


To which I would add:

Tchaikovsky
Roussel
Popov
Kancheli
Liszt (the Dante symphony)
Norholm

I should've included the Tchaikovsky, which is an unfairly maligned work. Must investigate the Popov, Kancheli, and Norholm.
"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music" - Sergei Rachmaninoff

kyjo

#118
Quote from: kyjo on October 21, 2017, 09:08:49 AM
Top 10:

Sibelius
Rachmaninoff
Elgar
RVW
Mahler
Hanson
Atterberg
Tubin
Weill
Arnold

I forgot Scriabin 2 ::) It's gonna have to replace the Arnold in my top 10.
"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music" - Sergei Rachmaninoff

vandermolen

An interesting thread (if I say so myself   8))

Many interesting choices. I'm ashamed to say that I hardly know Mahler's Second Symphony but will listen to it again. I thought a live concert I attended of his Third Symphony a while back was terrific. Here is a new list:

Popov
Ben Haim
Bernstein
VW (1920 version)
Tubin
Rootham

I find Rootham's last ditch Second Symphony incredibly moving - many other of the choices here I like, including Honeggar, Glazunov, Scriabin, Bax, Elgar, Creston, Diamond and Sibelius. One new suggestion - Madetoja.
"Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm" (Churchill).

'The test of a work of art is, in the end, our affection for it, not our ability to explain why it is good' (Stanley Kubrick).