Mozart vs. O2

Mozart · August 21, 2007, 08:38:11 PM

Simple enough.

max · August 21, 2007, 09:05:45 PM

Quote from: MozartMobster on August 21, 2007, 08:38:11 PM
Simple enough.

...not for the simple-minded. So who the f... is O2 and will Mozart still have all of his teeth at the end of the competition??

Mozart · August 22, 2007, 12:39:28 AM

Gmg seems very biased towards oxygen...Shenanigans I say!

Bonehelm · August 22, 2007, 01:33:46 AM

Mozart ran out of oxygen and dies
Oxygen doesn't have ears and therefore cannot listen to Mozart and dies

So Mahler wins. End of discussion.

Haffner · August 22, 2007, 04:38:28 AM

Without O2, I couldn't listen to Mozart. Or Mahler. Or Haydn, Beethoven, Bach, Wagner.

So, I "give it up" for O2...

dtwilbanks · August 22, 2007, 05:02:32 AM

Mark · August 22, 2007, 05:50:45 AM

Quote from: MozartMobster on August 22, 2007, 12:39:28 AM
Gmg seems very biased towards oxygen...Shenanigans I say!

mahlertitan · August 22, 2007, 08:51:35 AM

shouldn't all of this be in the Diner?

karlhenning · August 22, 2007, 08:53:10 AM

For listening, Mozart.

For breathing (mixed with other matter), O₂.

I don't see it as either/or . . . .

max · August 22, 2007, 11:56:36 AM

It's clear that I shouldn't be the first to respond!

bwv 1080 · August 22, 2007, 01:07:28 PM

How does the Clarinet Quintet sound if played in a methane atmosphere?

btpaul674 · August 22, 2007, 01:59:03 PM

Quote from: bwv 1080 on August 22, 2007, 01:07:28 PM
How does the Clarinet Quintet sound if played in a methane atmosphere?

a bit sharp. well, to the nose anyway.