the 136th tier (2025/4) - to April 7

Started by coffee, March 30, 2025, 01:26:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DavidW

Quote from: Symphonic Addict on March 31, 2025, 04:37:31 PMThis sort of threads is quite popular on the another forum, but here... not sure.  :-X

Ha! Yes, I was just wondering if Bulldog has rejoined us! :laugh:

DavidW

Aho: Symphony #4 [1973]
Haydn: Symphony #61 in D [1776]
Mozart: Serenade #7 in D "Haffner," K. 250 [1776]
Mozart: Violin Sonata #26 in B-flat, K 378 [1791]
Simpson: Clarinet Quintet [1968]

coffee

Quote from: DavidW on April 01, 2025, 08:49:08 AMAho: Symphony #4 [1973]
Haydn: Symphony #61 in D [1776]
Mozart: Serenade #7 in D "Haffner," K. 250 [1776]
Mozart: Violin Sonata #26 in B-flat, K 378 [1791]
Simpson: Clarinet Quintet [1968]

Thank you!

steve ridgway

OK, so of the 9 of these works in my collection I am happy to recommend

Birtwistle: Five Distances [1992]
Messiaen: Petites esquisses d'oiseaux [1985]
Penderecki: Trumpet Concertino [2015]
Scelsi: String Quartet #3 [1963]
Stockhausen: In Freundschaft [1977]

coffee

Quote from: steve ridgway on April 03, 2025, 07:40:50 PMOK, so of the 9 of these works in my collection I am happy to recommend

Birtwistle: Five Distances [1992]
Messiaen: Petites esquisses d'oiseaux [1985]
Penderecki: Trumpet Concertino [2015]
Scelsi: String Quartet #3 [1963]
Stockhausen: In Freundschaft [1977]

Much appreciated!

steve ridgway

Quote from: coffee on April 04, 2025, 03:29:43 AMMuch appreciated!

It was interesting to have a few pieces in my collection selected for me and to compare them against each other, will continue with the next round 8) .

coffee


steve ridgway

Five or six participants is pretty good really. How many contribute on TC?

coffee

Quote from: steve ridgway on April 05, 2025, 10:37:03 PMFive or six participants is pretty good really. How many contribute on TC?

It depends. This is a really, really deep tier so I wouldn't expect many. On the higher tiers with the more popular works it gets up to ten or twelve sometimes.

coffee

Alright, I'll wrap this up and start another thread. Here are the works we chose to recommend a bit more strongly: 

Up 2 tiers:
Messiaen: Petites esquisses d'oiseaux [1985]
Scelsi: String Quartet #3 [1963]
Schreker: Der Schatzgräber [1920]

Up 1 tier:
Abrahamsen: Left, Alone (Piano Concerto) [2016]
Aho: Symphony #4 [1973]
Bacewicz: Musić for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion [1958]
Barrett, R.: life-form [2012]
Berio: Sequenza XIII for accordion [1995]
Birtwistle: Five Distances [1992]
Grisey: L'Icône paradoxale [1992-1994]
Haydn: Symphony #61 in D [1776]
Ligeti: Artikulation [1958]
Mozart: Serenade #7 in D "Haffner," K. 250 [1776]
Mozart: Violin Sonata #26 in B-flat, K 378 [1791]
Nørgård: Turn [1973]
Penderecki: Trumpet Concertino [2015]
Purcell: Twelve Sonatas of Three Parts [c. 1680]
Reincken: An Wasserflüssen Babylon [1663]
Simpson: Clarinet Quintet [1968]
Stockhausen: In Freundschaft [1977]
Tan: Water Passion after Saint Matthew [2000]
Vivanco: Missa in Manus tuas [1608]

foxandpeng

Thank you for highlighting works that are not obvious choices. I still find the reason for this kind of post somewhat perplexing, as it seems to me to hold little rigour, but any desire to promote good music is positive,  I guess.
"A quiet secluded life in the country, with the possibility of being useful to people ... then work which one hopes may be of some use; then rest, nature, books, music, love for one's neighbour — such is my idea of happiness"

Tolstoy

hopefullytrusting

Quote from: foxandpeng on April 06, 2025, 01:22:13 PMThank you for highlighting works that are not obvious choices. I still find the reason for this kind of post somewhat perplexing, as it seems to me to hold little rigour, but any desire to promote good music is positive,  I guess.

If not for this thread, I doubt I would have heard of many of these pieces.

That's where I find the value.

I'm always on the prowl for music that I've not heard. :)

steve ridgway

Quote from: foxandpeng on April 06, 2025, 01:22:13 PMThank you for highlighting works that are not obvious choices. I still find the reason for this kind of post somewhat perplexing, as it seems to me to hold little rigour, but any desire to promote good music is positive,  I guess.

I think having a smaller number of contributors, but with keen and varied interests, may produce a more useful resource for exploration than something like the Classic FM polls.

Crudblud

A late arrival here. Since the OP is gone, does anyone know or could hazard a guess as to how this seemingly random list was determined to contain only works of the 136th tier, whatever that is?

Selig

Quote from: Crudblud on April 08, 2025, 03:29:59 AMA late arrival here. Since the OP is gone, does anyone know or could hazard a guess as to how this seemingly random list was determined to contain only works of the 136th tier, whatever that is?

No need to guess, it was already explained by the OP here: https://www.good-music-guide.com/community/index.php/topic,34112.0.html

Basically: anyone can nominate works, and new works will start at the lowest tier before climbing.