HIP Poll

Started by mn dave, June 04, 2008, 06:23:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What do you think of HIP?

I care a lot.
23 (56.1%)
I can take them or leave them.
15 (36.6%)
I avoid them like the plague.
3 (7.3%)

Total Members Voted: 31

Voting closed: July 04, 2008, 06:23:02 AM

Keemun

#20
Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 06:41:17 AM
In what ways?

I find there to be more clarity to the music, and the sound, whether it is the instruments or how they are played, just goes better with the music Bach wrote.

Here are two short examples from Bach's Mass in B Minor:

Suzuki/Bach Collegium Japan (HIP):

[mp3=200,20,0,center]http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/6/4/1945216/Suzuki.mp3[/mp3]

Karajan/Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra (Non-HIP):

[mp3=200,20,0,center]http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/6/4/1945216/Karajan.mp3[/mp3]



Let me know your thoughts on the differences.
Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. - Ludwig van Beethoven

BachQ

I'm going to suspend my vote until I see how Rod Corkin votes.

mn dave

Quote from: Keemun on June 04, 2008, 08:51:09 AM
Let me know your thoughts on the differences.

I can't listen now. Will try later. Thanks.

mn dave

Quote from: Dm on June 04, 2008, 08:52:50 AM
I'm going to suspend my vote until I see how Rod Corkin votes.

Who?

jochanaan

Quote from: Dm on June 04, 2008, 08:52:50 AM
I'm going to suspend my vote until I see how Rod Corkin votes.
What in the world for? ??? ;)
Imagination + discipline = creativity

Wanderer

Quote from: James on June 04, 2008, 07:41:46 AM
... irregardless of arrangement or the age of the instruments, the main thing I like to hear is the music played with heartfelt energy & passion. Someone that really brings the music to life. Instruments are just tools afterall, it's who's behind them that truly makes all the difference ultimately.

I agree completely.

prémont

Reality trumps our fantasy far beyond imagination.

prémont

Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 07:53:16 AM
Some have stated that these old instruments are preferred in the music of their era. So, I'm trying to get to the bottom of that. They sound "better" to strict HIPsters, but how so?

They do not sound better per se, but they are better suited to the music, which was composed for these instruments.

Reality trumps our fantasy far beyond imagination.

mn dave

Quote from: premont on June 04, 2008, 10:43:37 AM
Depend on, what you meant above.

I guess the "best" would be the latest model using the current technology. Unless somewhere along the way the instrument-makers made a wrong turn.

mn dave

Quote from: premont on June 04, 2008, 10:49:04 AM
They do not sound better per se, but they are better suited to the music, which was composed for these instruments.

If Bach were resurrected, I wonder what he'd say about his old material being played on harpsichords when there are perfectly fine pianos around.

Or would he complain after hearing his Goldbergs played on the piano because they were meant for the harpsichord?

He'd probably want to compose new music for the new instrument.

Que

Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 10:55:13 AM
He'd probably want to compose new music for the new instrument.

Oh, sure. But that is not the same thing as using it to play the music he did not compose for it.

Q

Que

#31
Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 10:51:07 AM
I guess the "best" would be the latest model using the current technology. Unless somewhere along the way the instrument-makers made a wrong turn.

Different sound does not equal better sound.
Much effort went into more volume and longer sustainability - all fueled by the fact that bigger spaces were used to perform in. Does that make it better?

Q

mn dave

Quote from: Que on June 04, 2008, 11:26:46 AM
Oh, sure. But that is not the same thing as using it to play the music he did not compose for it.

Q

Did he write for a specific instrument though? Or just any keyboard?

mn dave

Quote from: Que on June 04, 2008, 11:27:35 AM
- all fueled by the fact that bigger spaces were used to perform in.

Oh, that's the only reason?

Que

#34
Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 11:29:44 AM
Did he write for a specific instrument though? Or just any keyboard?

As far I know: clavichord and different types of harpsichords (harpsichord, lute-harpsicord, pedal-harpsichord)

Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 11:30:39 AM
Oh, that's the only reason?

Why else would you need more volume? To harass the neighbours? ;D

Q

Brian

Quote from: Que on June 04, 2008, 11:33:47 AM
As far I know: clavichord and different types of harpsichords (harpsichord, lute-harpsicord, pedal-harpsichord)

Q
Next month Naxos is releasing two discs of Bach's music for lute-harpsichord.

mn dave

Quote from: Brian on June 04, 2008, 11:35:33 AM
Next month Naxos is releasing two discs of Bach's music for lute-harpsichord.

Why didn't they just call it a lute-sichord? And what the heck is it? Or do I want to know?

Que

Quote from: Brian on June 04, 2008, 11:35:33 AM
Next month Naxos is releasing two discs of Bach's music for lute-harpsichord.

Thanks, Brian!  :) Who's playing?

Quote from: mn dave on June 04, 2008, 11:36:40 AM
Why didn't they just call it a lute-sichord? And what the heck is it? Or do I want to know?

Well, it's called a "Lautenwerck" in German, so you can blame the British for the term "lute-harpsicord"... 8)

What is it? See here or here

Do you want to know? Well, you sure don't sound like it. But Bach liked the instrument, and now let's assume for just a second that he was a very musical man... ::)

Q

mn dave

Quote from: Que on June 04, 2008, 11:54:10 AM
But Bach liked the instrument, and now let's assume for just a second that he was a very musical man.

Well, he was forced to use what was at hand.  :P

Brian

Quote from: Que on June 04, 2008, 11:54:10 AM
Thanks, Brian!  :) Who's playing?
Elizabeth Farr. Should be great :)