Modern composers with an original harmonic language

Started by escher, July 10, 2011, 03:07:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

karlhenning

Quote from: Grazioso on July 13, 2011, 05:19:08 AM
I don't say they're unique to Common Practice, but they're certainly well enabled by it. A perfect cadence is, if not perfect, damn useful  ;D

Sure. And as a composer, I think, what does a perfect cadence do (of itself, as opposed to allude to a thousand perfect cadences we've heard before), and how else might what it does, be done?

karlhenning

Quote from: Leon on July 13, 2011, 06:03:21 AM
. . . It is impossible to write new music using the same language that Beethoven did.

QFT.

Why, it's even inm;possible to write new music in the same language as Mendelssohn
; )

Grazioso

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on July 13, 2011, 05:54:23 AM
Sure. And as a composer, I think, what does a perfect cadence do (of itself, as opposed to allude to a thousand perfect cadences we've heard before), and how else might what it does, be done?

That's why I'd like to study psychoacoustics. You have to wonder if there's something strictly physiological in how certain frequency ratios affect us so readily, or is it culturally conditioned, or both?

Quote from: Leon on July 13, 2011, 06:03:21 AM
Not only are composers different 200 years removed from Beethoven's compositional language, but, so are audiences, as well as, the world we live in.  It is impossible to write new music using the same language that Beethoven did.  Yes, one can do it, but it fails to past muster as a worthwhile contribution.

Today's popular music, enjoyed by millions across the globe, is built from the same fundamental system he used.
There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact. --Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

CRCulver

Jonathan Harvey and Anders Brødsgaard are two composers interested in spectralism, but at some point were unwilling to completely leave behind serialism or total chromaticism. Harvey's Bhakti and Brødsgaard's Galaxy are examples of works that mix those two seemingly opposite approaches to harmony and come up with a new system that sounds very original (and the two composers sound nothing like each other). I think Brødsgaard's Galaxy would impress a lot of the regulars on this forum.

Cato

Alexander Tcherepnin's ideas on harmony and scales (often 9-tone ) and on polyphony (he had a variation called Interpoint)
can be found here:

http://www.tcherepnin.com/alex/basic_elem2.htm

Avenir de Monfred had a polymodal method he called New Diatonic Modal: look for a book called The NDM Principle of Relative Music.

Also see:

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/VLolbPZVuQA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/PKZ6dK56UxU&feature=related

And then there is Tibor Serly and his Modus Lascivus method, which involves creating scales and polyphonically restricting certain voices only to certain scales, which later in a movement are played simultaneously.  (A simplification: imagine "Section A" using a scale of C-F-B-C, "Section B" uses "C#-D-F#-G#-A-C#", and "Section C" reuses both A and B by playing them on top of each other.

His Concertino 3x3 uses this technique brilliantly.

http://www.amazon.com/Tibor-Serly-Designs-Concertino-Concerto/dp/B000ION68G/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1310604100&sr=1-1
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

Luke

Quote from: Cato on July 13, 2011, 04:43:37 PM
And then there is Tibor Serly and his Modus Lascivus method, which involves creating scales and polyphonically restricting certain voices only to certain scales, which later in a movement are played simultaneously.  (A simplification: imagine "Section A" using a scale of C-F-B-C, "Section B" uses "C#-D-F#-G#-A-C#", and "Section C" reuses both A and B by playing them on top of each other.


Sounds familiar....   ;)  Very familiar indeed. Was he copying me?  ;D

(Cato - will reply to your email when I get the chance to give it the time it deserves!)

escher

Quote from: Cato on July 13, 2011, 04:43:37 PM
Alexander Tcherepnin's ideas on harmony and scales (often 9-tone ) and on polyphony (he had a variation called Interpoint)
can be found here:

http://www.tcherepnin.com/alex/basic_elem2.htm

Avenir de Monfred had a polymodal method he called New Diatonic Modal: look for a book called The NDM Principle of Relative Music.

Also see:

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/VLolbPZVuQA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/PKZ6dK56UxU&feature=related

And then there is Tibor Serly and his Modus Lascivus method, which involves creating scales and polyphonically restricting certain voices only to certain scales, which later in a movement are played simultaneously.  (A simplification: imagine "Section A" using a scale of C-F-B-C, "Section B" uses "C#-D-F#-G#-A-C#", and "Section C" reuses both A and B by playing them on top of each other.

His Concertino 3x3 uses this technique brilliantly.

http://www.amazon.com/Tibor-Serly-Designs-Concertino-Concerto/dp/B000ION68G/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1310604100&sr=1-1

thank you Cato, i've heard something of both  Tcherepnin and Serly some time ago but i was forgetting about them. They are very interesting composers, thank you for the reminder. Never heard of Avenir de Monfred. Great post

escher

Quote from: CRCulver on July 13, 2011, 06:44:58 AM
Jonathan Harvey and Anders Brødsgaard are two composers interested in spectralism, but at some point were unwilling to completely leave behind serialism or total chromaticism. Harvey's Bhakti and Brødsgaard's Galaxy are examples of works that mix those two seemingly opposite approaches to harmony and come up with a new system that sounds very original (and the two composers sound nothing like each other). I think Brødsgaard's Galaxy would impress a lot of the regulars on this forum.

thank you too CRCulver, never heard of both those composers.

Grazioso

A good candidate for interesting harmonies: Gloria Coates, with her microtonal dissonances.

http://www.youtube.com/v/wQH17p-zGv8

There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact. --Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Cato

Quote from: Cato on July 13, 2011, 04:43:37 PM
Alexander Tcherepnin's ideas on harmony and scales (often 9-tone ) and on polyphony (he had a variation called Interpoint)
can be found here:

http://www.tcherepnin.com/alex/basic_elem2.htm

Avenir de Monfred had a polymodal method he called New Diatonic Modal: look for a book called The NDM Principle of Relative Music.

Also see:

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/VLolbPZVuQA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/v/v/PKZ6dK56UxU&feature=related

And then there is Tibor Serly and his Modus Lascivus method, which involves creating scales and polyphonically restricting certain voices only to certain scales, which later in a movement are played simultaneously.  (A simplification: imagine "Section A" using a scale of C-F-B-C, "Section B" uses "C#-D-F#-G#-A-C#", and "Section C" reuses both A and B by playing them on top of each other.

His Concertino 3x3 uses this technique brilliantly.

http://www.amazon.com/Tibor-Serly-Designs-Concertino-Concerto/dp/B000ION68G/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1310604100&sr=1-1
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

ComposerOfAvantGarde

Spectralism was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this thread, but I see that's been discussed already.

I suppose I could mention Elliott Carter. He catalogued every possible chord using the 12 note chromatic scale and used some of them as the basis of his pitch material in his later works. I believe his opera 'What Next?' for example uses a 4 note all-interval chord and a 6 note polychord made up of two triads as the basis of all the melodies and harmonies used over the course of 40 minutes. It's a much more conservative approach to composition, which is very much rooted in melody and harmony, compared to what many of his contemporaries were doing.

Cato

#31
Quote from: jessop on November 23, 2016, 01:36:36 AM
Spectralism was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this thread, but I see that's been discussed already.

I suppose I could mention Elliott Carter. He catalogued every possible chord using the 12 note chromatic scale and used some of them as the basis of his pitch material in his later works. I believe his opera 'What Next?' for example uses a 4 note all-interval chord and a 6 note polychord made up of two triads as the basis of all the melodies and harmonies used over the course of 40 minutes. It's a much more conservative approach to composition, which is very much rooted in melody and harmony, compared to what many of his contemporaries were doing.

Many thanks for the reminder!  Given the "Atonal - Tonal" discussion elsewhere (q.v.), I thought members might be interested in reviewing this topic.

Gloria Coates was mentioned earlier: some of her works may be too static for some.  Here are two examples:

https://www.youtube.com/v/436fRvk3b34

https://www.youtube.com/v/3TO6D6S2oNk
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)

ComposerOfAvantGarde

Hah, compared to Eliane Radigue  (a composer for whom I have much admiration) Coates can whizz by at an incredible pace. :D

Cato

Quote from: jessop on November 23, 2016, 03:30:59 AM
Hah, compared to Eliane Radigue  (a composer for whom I have much admiration) Coates can whizz by at an incredible pace. :D

Wow!  Music at 16 2/3 RPM!  8)
"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)



Cato

"Meet Miss Ruth Sherwood, from Columbus, Ohio, the Middle of the Universe!"

- Brian Aherne introducing Rosalind Russell in  My Sister Eileen (1942)