Pianists

Started by Carlos von Kleiber, June 28, 2008, 06:45:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pick one!

Schnabel
1 (2.2%)
Kempff
12 (26.7%)
Richter
20 (44.4%)
Cortot
3 (6.7%)
Michelangeli
9 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 31

Carlos von Kleiber

Your personal preference?

mn dave

Gah.

Well, I do like Schnabel. As well as Kempff. And Richter. Cortot, maybe not so much. And I really haven't heard much Michelangeli, to tell the truth.

I guess in this situation, I pick Kempff, because currently his recordings mean more to me than the others.

Gurn Blanston

From that period of time, there are 3 pianists for me:

Richter
Kempff
Serkin

Of course there are others, but these 3 are my personal tops  :)

8)

----------------
Listening to:
Schubert D 780 - Mitsuko Uchida - Schubert Moment Musicaux #6 in Ab for Piano D 780
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Drasko

In ascending order.


Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Drasko on June 28, 2008, 07:15:11 AM
In ascending order.

Oh, you mean Serkin, Kempff Richter? Yes, I could live with that too. I was going for "no particular order".

8)

Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Drasko

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on June 28, 2008, 07:25:32 AM
Oh, you mean Serkin, Kempff Richter? Yes, I could live with that too. I was going for "no particular order".

No, I was considering OP's list, not yours.

Quote from: mn dave on June 28, 2008, 07:16:24 AM
???

???

mn dave

Quote from: Drasko on June 28, 2008, 10:49:27 AM
No, I was considering OP's list, not yours.

???

In which direction are you ascending?

ezodisy

Quote from: Drasko on June 28, 2008, 07:15:11 AM
In ascending order.

me too, though I'd switch Richter/Cortot

Quote from: mn dave on June 28, 2008, 10:56:20 AM
In which direction are you ascending?

bottom to top

not sure why these 5 were mentioned...

mn dave

#9
Quote from: ezodisy on June 28, 2008, 11:03:28 AM
bottom to top

Well, that's okay then.  :)

[...if you mean Schnabel is at the top]

Don

Those are five superb pianists, but I'd have to go with Cortot.

DavidRoss

Depends on the repertoire, dudnit?
"Maybe the problem most of you have ... is that you're not listening to Barbirolli." ~Sarge

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher

Carlos von Kleiber

Of course, but I thought you had an overall favourite.
I wanted to choose some influential pianists which differ a lot.

DavidRoss

An overall favorite?  Well, in that case...Rubinstein!
"Maybe the problem most of you have ... is that you're not listening to Barbirolli." ~Sarge

"The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret Thatcher

Holden

For variety of repertoire alone, Richter has the rest beaten hands down. Technically, he is also in front though Michelangeli might come close. Musically, they were all different people but I enjoy just about everthing Richter does and I can't say that for the others.

Also, why no Gilels or Rubinstein?
Cheers

Holden

prémont

The answer depends upon the repertoire, e.g.:

For Beethoven Kempff
For Bartok       Sandor
For Bach         None
Reality trumps our fantasy far beyond imagination.

Que

Quote from: Holden on June 28, 2008, 02:59:23 PM
Also, why no Gilels or Rubinstein?

Or Edwin Fischer, or Solomon.

Q

jochanaan

In more-or-less chronological order:
Rudolf Serkin
Martha Argerich
Murray Perahia

These are probalby my overall favorites; every recording I've heard from each of them is utterly masterful.  And they're very different in what they play and how they play it.  Serkin is the consummate player for the Austro-German repertoire, especially Beethoven and Mendelssohn; Argerich is great at the Russian Romantic and (I believe) contemporary music, while Perahia is the quintessential classicist whose Mozart and Brahms are beyond reproach.

However, there are others who win my vote in a more limited sense:

Artur Rubinstein in Chopin
Vladimir Horowitz in D. Scarlatti's sonatas
Alicia de Larrocha (of course!) in Spanish piano music
Jean-Yves Thibaudet in French music, especially Ravel and Messiaen
Maurizio Pollini in Stravinsky and Bartók (and probably other contemporary composers; but I don't like his Chopin or what I've heard of his Beethoven)

Stephen Hough deserves honorable mention for his devotion to obscure virtuoso Romantic concerti; he makes a compelling case for music that's no longer in fashion and that I probably wouldn't care for if anyone else played them. :)
Imagination + discipline = creativity

Don

Quote from: premont on June 28, 2008, 05:03:07 PM
The answer depends upon the repertoire, e.g.:

For Beethoven Kempff
For Bartok       Sandor
For Bach         None

I'd take Gould and Tureck for Bach.

orbital

I'm with Drasko.
Michelangeli is the only pianist here who is great regardless of the composer he has played.