What were you listening to? (CLOSED)

Started by Maciek, April 06, 2007, 02:22:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 150 Guests are viewing this topic.

Dundonnell

Quote from: Catison on October 30, 2008, 06:25:28 AM
Can I jump in here for him.  In Russia it is common to call people, formally, by their first and patronymic name.  I suppose Karl is indulging in a bit of his Russophilia.

I thought that he had promised to stop this silly nomenclature nonsense ;D ;D

Dundonnell

Quote from: Corey on October 30, 2008, 06:50:10 AM
:D By that you're implying that I sometimes play bad music? ;D

No...he is stating that your current taste in music is impeccable ;D :)

When you get a compliment on this board at present relish the experience :) ;)

Harry

From the big box box, this fine specimen of excellence....

Christo

Quote from: Dundonnell on October 30, 2008, 06:58:24 AM
When you get a compliment on this board at present relish the experience :) ;)

Nudge, nudge  ;) ;)
... music is not only an 'entertainment', nor a mere luxury, but a necessity of the spiritual if not of the physical life, an opening of those magic casements through which we can catch a glimpse of that country where ultimate reality will be found.    RVW, 1948

karlhenning


M forever

Quote from: marvinbrown on October 30, 2008, 06:19:54 AM
  AKA Prokofiev! His name is Prokofiev Karl   $:), his name is Prokofiev!

Actually the correct form of the name in the Latin alphabet is Prokofieff. As with Rachmaninoff, this is not the spelling English speakers with knowledge of Russian are used to, but in both cases, these spellings reflect historical circumstances of the composers' lifes and careers which go beyond and contain information beyond the locally correct forms of transliteration.

Therefore, Prokofieff's works are listed under this form of the name in his publisher's catalog even though that is an English company. But again, what matters here aren't local transliteration variations, but the historical circumstances reflected in the spelling of the name(s).

karlhenning

Hindemith
Symphony in E-flat
NY Phil
Lenny

mn dave



Who were some Purcell contemporaries worth checking out?

karlhenning

Hindemith
Konzertmusik for Brass and Strings, Opus 50
NY Phil
Lenny

mozartsneighbor



Mozart and Beethoven's Quintets for Piano and Winds
Mozart's Sinfonia Concertante in E flat major

marvinbrown

Quote from: M forever on October 30, 2008, 08:57:40 AM
Actually the correct form of the name in the Latin alphabet is Prokofieff. As with Rachmaninoff, this is not the spelling English speakers with knowledge of Russian are used to, but in both cases, these spellings reflect historical circumstances of the composers' lifes and careers which go beyond and contain information beyond the locally correct forms of transliteration.

Therefore, Prokofieff's works are listed under this form of the name in his publisher's catalog even though that is an English company. But again, what matters here aren't local transliteration variations, but the historical circumstances reflected in the spelling of the name(s).

  Pardon my ignorance here for I do not speak Russian but how is it that ff in both names is written v ? Is ff pronounced v ?

  marvin

karlhenning

Quote from: mozartsneighbor on October 30, 2008, 10:02:26 AM
Mozart and Beethoven's Quintets for Piano and Winds

The Mozart especially is a magnificent piece!

The new erato

#34832
Quote from: mn dave on October 30, 2008, 09:53:36 AM


Who were some Purcell contemporaries worth checking out?
From England; John Blow. His Venus & Adonis is a wonderful work.

PS I hope it is not meant to be spelt John Bloffff, if a v is double f, a w should be a quadruple f.

karlhenning

Try this one again:

Rakhmaninov
Symphony No. 2 in E minor, Opus 27
Phila
Ormandy

mn dave

Quote from: erato on October 30, 2008, 10:15:52 AM
From England; John Blow. His Venus & Adonis is a wonderful work.

PS I hope it is not meant to be spelt John Bloffff, if a v is double f, a w should be a quadruple f.

Thanks, Odd. Any from other countries?

mozartsneighbor

Quote from: karlhenning on October 30, 2008, 10:09:31 AM
The Mozart especially is a magnificent piece!

It really is -- in a letter to his father, in which Mozart described the Quintet's first performance, he declared it to be his best work yet!

Now:
Debussy, Estampes, Sviatoslav Richter

Que

Gabriela Beňačková (Slovak soprano):

Operatic recital - arias from: The Barted Bride, Rusalka, Armida, Jenufa, Eugene Onegin, War and Peace, Katerina Ismailova, The Queen of Spades. (Supraphon)

Q

karlhenning

Nielsen
Symphony No. 6, Sinfonia semplice
Royal Scottish Orchestra
Bryden Thomson

not edward

Quote from: karlhenning on October 30, 2008, 11:41:13 AM
Nielsen
Symphony No. 6, Sinfonia semplice
Royal Scottish Orchestra
Bryden Thomson

That's one of my favourite Nielsen Sixths. I'm not generally a fan of Thomson's conducting but I think this is one place where he gets pretty much everything right: I must revisit it soon.

Giving this recording a revisit:



Another former RSNO chief conductor that I don't typically like but who seems to do a better job than usual here. The Enfant perhaps lacks some subtlety but I think it does capture the spirit of the piece well; I also really enjoy the recording of the Divertissement, though I'd love to hear it under a different orchestra and conductor. The Andante and Symphonic Song are lesser works and I think given rather tentative performances here.

Also, a first listen to this collection:



David Wilson-Johnson is, I think, a little too English (for want of a better term) for A Survivor from Warsaw's good (not that this work lacks good recordings) but I liked him in Ode to Napoleon Buonaparte; however the main interest for me was Rolf Schulte in the violin concerto. On first listening, it's a weighty, romantic, generally rather slow reading (in contrast to Hahn/Salonen's recent hyper-swift traveral), though I found Craft's direction perhaps a little staid. I'll definitely have to give this one more attention, though.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

M forever

Quote from: marvinbrown on October 30, 2008, 10:03:49 AM
  Pardon my ignorance here for I do not speak Russian but how is it that ff in both names is written v ? Is ff pronounced v ?

I think the Russian в is typically unvoiced at the end of a word, like "f", but since my knowledge of Russian is very rudimentary, other people can give more precise information about these pronunciation nuances.

In these particular cases, the ending "ff" instead of "v" is actually the French way of spelling Russian names. I am not sure why that is. In Prokofieff's case, it may reflect the long period of time he lived primarily in Paris (1920-1935) or it may be because Russian composers were published in the West before WWI by Koussevitzky's Edition Russe de la Musique, and then Koussevitzky himself was first based in Paris before he moved to Boston.