Who was/is the HOTTEST composer?

Started by Tapkaara, August 26, 2009, 10:30:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5
User actions

CD

#20
August 26, 2009, 02:13:09 PM
Quote from: Bulldog on August 26, 2009, 02:07:27 PM
Most of you guys are picking other guys.  What's up?

I think a perfectly heterosexual male can say that another man is objectively hot. Personally, I am not a perfectly heterosexual male, but I think Massenet was objectively attractive as a young man.

CD

#21
August 26, 2009, 02:19:25 PM
Peter Warlock also had a very striking look (it's the eyes).

ChamberNut

#22
August 26, 2009, 02:37:17 PM
Young Janacek and Young Brahms were good looking fellows.

But Clara Schumann takes the prize!  What a Fanny on that one!  ;D

Tapkaara

#23
August 26, 2009, 02:55:02 PM
I don't think it's safe to assume that everyone in the classical music forum is a heterosexual male...

After all, this isn't the American Football Forum or the Garage Tools forum...though I'm sure they have a few gay people, too!

Tapkaara

#24
August 26, 2009, 02:56:22 PM
Quote from: ChamberNut on August 26, 2009, 02:37:17 PM
Young Janacek and Young Brahms were good looking fellows.

But Clara Schumann takes the prize!  What a Fanny on that one!  ;D

I DEFINITELY agree on young Brahms. He really let himself go though, didn't he?

Bulldog

#25
August 26, 2009, 02:57:59 PM
Quote from: corey on August 26, 2009, 02:13:09 PM
I think a perfectly heterosexual male can say that another man is objectively hot.

He can say it, but he can't feel it.   :D

ChamberNut

#26
August 26, 2009, 03:00:08 PM
Quote from: Tapkaara on August 26, 2009, 02:56:22 PM
I DEFINITELY agree on young Brahms. He really let himself go though, didn't he?



Too many crumbs in the beard.  ;D

Bulldog

#27
August 26, 2009, 03:01:49 PM
Quote from: Tapkaara on August 26, 2009, 02:55:02 PM
I don't think it's safe to assume that everyone in the classical music forum is a heterosexual male...


Why not?  There aren't any homosexuals in Iran, and that's a much larger population. 8)

ChamberNut

#28
August 26, 2009, 03:02:42 PM
Quote from: Bulldog on August 26, 2009, 03:01:49 PM
Why not?  There aren't any homosexuals in Iran, and that's a much larger population. 8)

I'm sure there are some.  Just in the closet.

Tapkaara

#29
August 26, 2009, 03:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bulldog on August 26, 2009, 03:01:49 PM
Why not?  There aren't any homosexuals in Iran, and that's a much larger population. 8)

I think all the homosexuals in Iran end up here...that's why they are not in Iran.

CD

#30
August 26, 2009, 03:06:57 PM
Quote from: ChamberNut on August 26, 2009, 03:02:42 PM
I'm sure there are some.  Just in the closet.

That was the joke. :D Ahmadinejad famously said that there are no homosexuals in Iran, and that it's a Western phenomenon.  ::)

ChamberNut

#31
August 26, 2009, 03:08:31 PM
Quote from: corey on August 26, 2009, 03:06:57 PM
That was the joke. :D Ahmadinejad famously said that there are no homosexuals in Iran, and that it's a Western phenomenon.  ::)

Oh, oops. Obviously I missed the joke.  I hadn't heard that said.

Tapkaara

#32
August 26, 2009, 03:10:31 PM
Quote from: corey on August 26, 2009, 03:06:57 PM
That was the joke. :D Ahmadinejad famously said that there are no homosexuals in Iran, and that it's a Western phenomenon.  ::)

And if he were a composer, Ahmadinejad won't most definitely NOT be hot. He has nothing on the young Brahms.

jwinter

#33
August 26, 2009, 03:13:48 PM Last Edit: August 26, 2009, 03:17:27 PM by jwinter
Wagner.  It's pretty hot down there.  ;D
The man that hath no music in himself,
Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds,
Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils.
The motions of his spirit are dull as night,
And his affections dark as Erebus.
Let no such man be trusted.

-- William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice

Chaszz

#34
August 26, 2009, 04:25:54 PM
In terms of the swooning, sighing and crying of the female sex, veritable 19th century analogues of the Sinatra and Beatles phenomena, it's got to be Liszt and Paganini.

Dana

#35
August 26, 2009, 04:28:39 PM
Quote from: Tapkaara on August 26, 2009, 02:56:22 PMI DEFINITELY agree on young Brahms. He really let himself go though, didn't he?

Quote from: ChamberNut on August 26, 2009, 03:00:08 PMToo many crumbs in the beard.  ;D

What? He was saving them for later...

Henk

#36
August 26, 2009, 04:39:30 PM Last Edit: August 26, 2009, 04:42:27 PM by Henk
Quote from: Tapkaara on August 26, 2009, 02:55:02 PM
I don't think it's safe to assume that everyone in the classical music forum is a heterosexual male...

After all, this isn't the American Football Forum or the Garage Tools forum...though I'm sure they have a few gay people, too!

Regarding the enthusiasm you show by posting the names of some composers, I assume you're gay or bisexual (regarding the enthusiasm you show by posting the name of some females also). I don't need to know, but wonder why you don't clarify spontaneously.

Henk

#37
August 26, 2009, 04:40:22 PM
Quote from: Bulldog on August 26, 2009, 02:07:27 PM
Most of you guys are picking other guys.  What's up?

Same thought here.

Henk

#38
August 26, 2009, 04:41:29 PM
Quote from: Bulldog on August 26, 2009, 02:57:59 PM
He can say it, but he can't feel it.   :D

And so he has no personal taste for it.

CD

#39
August 26, 2009, 04:47:06 PM
Quote from: Henk on August 26, 2009, 04:39:30 PM
Regarding the enthusiasm you show by posting the names of some composers, I assume you're gay or bisexual (regarding the enthusiasm you show by posting the name of some females also). I don't need to know, but wonder why you don't clarify spontaneously.

Who cares?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5
User actions