Favourite Shostakovich symphonies...

Started by Lethevich, September 26, 2009, 12:40:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Three favourite symphonies!

No.2
2 (12.5%)
No.3
0 (0%)
No.6
10 (62.5%)
No.8
13 (81.3%)
No.9
5 (31.3%)
No.11
14 (87.5%)
No.12
2 (12.5%)
No.13
6 (37.5%)
No.14
8 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 16

offbeat

Quote from: Guido on September 27, 2009, 09:25:03 AM
I'm amazed that the 8th is so well loved. Saying this as a Shostakovich fan, I found it incredibly boring both times I heard it... Obviously I'll need to try it again, but there's nothing he does here that he doesn't do better else-where.
For myself i would not say the 8th was well loved but admired for its atmosphere and extreme emotion - needs to be heard more than twice maybe - whats yr favourite  ???

Guido

Probably the 10th, though I love the 1st, 4th, 5th, 13th and 14th too.
Geologist.

The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away

Dana

#22
Quote from: Guido on September 27, 2009, 09:25:03 AMI'm amazed that the 8th is so well loved. Saying this as a Shostakovich fan, I found it incredibly boring both times I heard it... Obviously I'll need to try it again, but there's nothing he does here that he doesn't do better else-where.

      My first recording of this symphony sold me - Mravinsky with the Leningrad Philharmonic. Aside from the impact of having such a huge orchestra perform the work, Mravinsky and the LPO give a totally committed performance, and the result is something that's emotionally on par with the 8th quartet, if it's not as structurally sound. It's long, it's drawn out, but it's also incredibly demanding, and is a completely draining experience, both for performer and audience.

greg

Quote from: Guido on September 27, 2009, 09:25:03 AM
I'm amazed that the 8th is so well loved. Saying this as a Shostakovich fan, I found it incredibly boring both times I heard it... Obviously I'll need to try it again, but there's nothing he does here that he doesn't do better else-where.
That's EXACTLY what I thought of it the first few times of listening to it. Then, eventually, I started to like it, but I've never loved it quite like some of the others.

Lethevich

Thanks for the comments, folks. Looks like I need to check out 6, 8 and 11 right away.

The results also show not only the near-universal dislike of 2-3, but also that people think the 2nd is better, so I will check that out too - I had considered 2 and 3 a no-go zone until now. It is also intriguing that 12 has one less vote than 2 - what is so bad about it? It looks similar to the 11th in style.
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

Dana

The second must be heard live - don't be disheartened if you don't like a recording!

Drasko

Quote from: Lethe on September 28, 2009, 06:39:45 AM
Thanks for the comments, folks. Looks like I need to check out 6, 8 and 11 right away.

Just keep in mind that tempo variations between conductors can be very substantial, for instance both Kondrashin and Mravinsky clock 6th in about 26-27 minutes while Bernstein takes minute or two less for just first movement, or that Kondrashin's 11th is about 54 minutes while Rostropovich in London takes around 74.


Lethevich

Quote from: Drasko on September 28, 2009, 07:00:23 AM
Just keep in mind that tempo variations between conductors can be very substantial, for instance both Kondrashin and Mravinsky clock 6th in about 26-27 minutes while Bernstein takes minute or two less for just first movement

The only I have at the moment is Barshai - I'll definitely try to hear the Bernstein - it sounds fun.
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

karlhenning

Quote from: Dana on September 28, 2009, 06:42:22 AM
The second must be heard live - don't be disheartened if you don't like a recording!

Have you heard it live, Dana!? (Were you playing in it?)

I like the Second and Third much better than I had expected I should.

karlhenning

Quote from: Lethe on September 28, 2009, 06:39:45 AM
Thanks for the comments, folks. Looks like I need to check out 6, 8 and 11 right away.

The results also show not only the near-universal dislike of 2-3, but also that people think the 2nd is better, so I will check that out too - I had considered 2 and 3 a no-go zone until now. It is also intriguing that 12 has one less vote than 2 - what is so bad about it? It looks similar to the 11th in style.

FWIW, I do like the Second and Third better than either the Eleventh or Twelfth.

DavidW

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 28, 2009, 07:56:58 AM
FWIW, I do like the Second and Third better than either the Eleventh or Twelfth.

I think that 11th and 12th are filler compared to the great, deep 13th and 14th symphonies. 8)

karlhenning


greg

I think for the 11th, the recording is extremely important. The one I have on CD is great- I'm not 100% sure who the conductor is  :D, but I'm thinking is Rozhdestvensky. The main part is the march in the 2nd movement, which is extremely powerful. There is a moment when the trombones kick in that sounds like the loudest thing ever recorded (they tend to sound like they are about to blast open the speakers).  :o
Now, after watching a video I've seen on youtube with crazy dude Gergiev conducting (ugh  :P ), I realized it can be conducted in a way that's entirely unconvincing and weak. Hopefully most recordings don't sound like that.

ChamberNut

Totally disagree about the comments (disparaging) on the 11th!  $:)

If there is such a thing as the Tier I Shostakovich symphonies, it certainly belongs there.  It's not my favorite symphony, but it is part of a group of "favorites" following the unbeatable 10th!  :)

karlhenning

Quote from: ChamberNut on September 28, 2009, 09:23:27 AM
Totally disagree about the comments (disparaging) on the 11th!  $:)

Strictly speaking, officer, I've only stated that I prefer the Second and Third  0:)

karlhenning


Drasko

Quote from: Lethe on September 28, 2009, 07:52:23 AM
The only I have at the moment is Barshai - I'll definitely try to hear the Bernstein - it sounds fun.

Barshai is good. I don't think Bernstein works, but might be fun to compare. It's his later Wiena recording on DG, with cute cover (also in the DG box):


Dana

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 28, 2009, 07:55:28 AMHave you heard it live, Dana!? (Were you playing in it?)
Quote from: Dana on September 26, 2009, 02:25:17 PMI saw Gergiev and his orchestra do the 2nd on Shostakovich's centenary, and it still stands out as a singularly vivid experience that makes you wonder about what might have been even more than the 1st symphony does.

:)

ChamberNut

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 28, 2009, 09:35:24 AM
Strictly speaking, officer, I've only stated that I prefer the Second and Third  0:)

That in itself, is a disparaging remark.  ;D  Just kidding, Karl.  ;)

not edward

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on September 28, 2009, 07:56:58 AM
FWIW, I do like the Second and Third better than either the Eleventh or Twelfth.
I think this is probably an unconventional view, but I'd share it. The Second has some remarkable moments before the rather uninspiring final chorus, and the Third, while also uneven, is an intriguing transitional work leading to the Fourth.

While I do like the Twelfth occasionally (I think it works best if it's played to extremes so it becomes almost self-satire), I must admit to having yet to hear a performance of the Eleventh that doesn't make the piece sound just dull to me.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music