Favorite Unfinished Symphonies or Symphonic Fragments

Started by Archaic Torso of Apollo, April 20, 2011, 09:01:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which do you like the most?

Bruckner 9
21 (52.5%)
Schubert 8
8 (20%)
Mahler 10
7 (17.5%)
Borodin 3
1 (2.5%)
Elgar 3
1 (2.5%)
Schnittke 9
0 (0%)
Other
2 (5%)

Total Members Voted: 32

MDL

Quote from: Luke on April 20, 2011, 09:05:33 AM
Not a symphony but Schoenberg's Jakobsleiter certainly springs to mind.

That, along with Mahler 10 and Bruckner 9.


Scarpia

Quote from: MDL on April 20, 2011, 03:08:06 PM
That, along with Mahler 10 and Bruckner 9.

Mahler 10 and Bruckner 9 are part of the poll.   ???

MDL

Anyone heard any of the various versions of the 4th movement of Bruckner 9; sketches or speculative completions? I'd be interested to have a vague idea of how Bruckner planned to finish that daunting, devastating 3rd movement.

Edit: "planned to follow", not "planned to finish", obviously. Durr.

MDL

Quote from: Il Barone Scarpia on April 20, 2011, 03:10:21 PM
Mahler 10 and Bruckner 9 are part of the poll.   ???

Yeah, I know. I voted for Mahler 10, but would have voted for Bruckner and Schoenberg as well had multiple voting been allowed and had the Schoenberg been included.

not edward

Quote from: MDL on April 20, 2011, 03:12:50 PM
Anyone heard any of the various versions of the 4th movement of Bruckner 9; sketches or speculative completions? I'd be interested to have a vague idea of how Bruckner planned to finish that daunting, devastating 3rd movement.
What I've heard indicates a finale somewhat along the lines of the 8th, but with a much higher level of dissonance. The movement climaxes with repeated fortissimo dissonances, which just stop dead to be replaced by a far more consonant coda knitting together the main themes of the symphony.

It doesn't really work, and maybe even with more time Bruckner wouldn't have been able to make it work. But it does indicate to me no lessening of musical ambition in his last months.
"I don't at all mind actively disliking a piece of contemporary music, but in order to feel happy about it I must consciously understand why I dislike it. Otherwise it remains in my mind as unfinished business."
-- Aaron Copland, The Pleasures of Music

eyeresist

#25
I like Mahler 10 a lot, but Bruckner 9 is even more magnificent.

My feelings on the question of completion of B9 is that it is an (unwitting?) insult to Bruckner to insist that the adagio is the correct conclusion. He would have disagreed!

I've only heard the Inbal performance of the finale, which was a much earlier reconstruction and performed unidiomatically IMO (making me wonder if the sketches were lacking dynamic markings). I want to believe that subsequent efforts have arrived nearer to what Bruckner in fact wrote, but it is expensive to keep up with the recordings of new editions as they come out.

The 1998 Wildner recording has been praised; subsequently there have been competing revisions of the completion.
I think the most faithful to the sketches is the 1992 Finale Realization by Samale//Philips/Cohrs/Mazzuca - Revised 2007 by Samale and Cohrs (recorded by Harding and Layer). The 2005 revision was recorded by Bosch.

Going by reviews, it seems hardly anyone has heard these recordings. This survey says Layer is the one to hear:
http://www.stereophile.com/content/bruckners-symphony-no9-finally-ifinalei-recordings-completed-ifinalei

http://www.abruckner.com/discography/symphonyno9indmino/

Mirror Image

#26
Quote from: eyeresist on April 20, 2011, 08:44:50 PMMy feelings on the question of completion of B9 is that it is an (unwitting?) insult to Bruckner to insist that the adagio is the correct conclusion. He would have disagreed!

Bruckner could have possibly finished this symphony had he not been so obsessed with revising his earlier symphonies. After all, he was a ruthless self-critic and also was plagued with constant self-doubt about his music. This was a blessing and a curse throughout his life. But, overall, this symphony, whether unfinished or whatever, is very near and dear to my heart. Absolutely an astonishing piece of music.

I plan to do some deeper research into Bruckner's music as it has always remained some of the finest music I ever heard, but also the composer himself has always interested me.

eyeresist

Quote from: Mirror Image on April 20, 2011, 09:10:57 PM
Bruckner could have possibly finished this symphony had he not been so obsessed with revising his earlier symphonies.

But...

Quote from: Il Barone Scarpia on April 20, 2011, 10:46:44 AM
The piece was finished, except for the coda, which had been extensively sketched.  Upon Bruckner's death his collected papers were ransacked by collectible hunters and half of Bruckner's final draft is now lost.

See the essays by Van Der Wal and Cohrs:
http://www.abruckner.com/discography/symphonyno9indmino/

Sid

I voted for Mahler's 10th. The opening Adagio is one of his finest utterances. I love the way he pushes tonality and uses a lot of dissonance in this piece. The rest of the symphony is very fine as well, I particularly like the final movement. There is hope at the end, despite the fact that he knew that he wouldn't live much longer. I know that his 9th symphony is a more definitive work, but I find it too dark and depressing. I'd much rather listen to the 10th, imperfect as it is.

Apart from that, I'm most familiar with Schubert's 8th and Bruckner's 9th. Schubert's 8th symphony is one of my favourite works by him. Another unfinished symphony by Schubert was his 10th. I used to own the recording of the Newbould completion, and even saw this work live at Sydney University in the '90's. It's quite an enjoyable and substantial work, comparable in idiom and scope the his 9th symphony, the "Great C-Major."

Bruckner's 9th symphony, as well as his 8th, are perhaps his finest creations. But I find them way too dark and they depress the **** out of me. Having said that, I'm a huge fan of his 6th and 7th symphonies in particular.

As for the rest of the list, I have heard all the others, except the Schnittke (& may well get the ECM disc which has the finished - or reconstructed - version of that work). I'm not hugely into Borodin's or Elgar's symphonic music, I'd much rather listen to their chamber stuff, but that's another story...

Lethevich

I also find that the 9th is a bit too dark for regular listening, but the 8th? That's a passionate deep red! :) A bouncing scherzo, heavenly adagio and joyful finale (albeit sligthly manic).
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

eyeresist

Quote from: Sid on April 20, 2011, 11:59:53 PM
Another unfinished symphony by Schubert was his 10th. I used to own the recording of the Newbould completion, and even saw this work live at Sydney University in the '90's. It's quite an enjoyable and substantial work, comparable in idiom and scope the his 9th symphony, the "Great C-Major."

You may be thinking of the 7th? Newbould's version of the 10th has only three movements and goes for about 27.30 (Marriner recording). (The 7th has four movements and goes for 38.20.)

DavidW

Quote from: Lethe Dmitriyevich Shostakovich on April 21, 2011, 12:57:27 AM
I also find that the 9th is a bit too dark for regular listening, but the 8th? That's a passionate deep red! :) A bouncing scherzo, heavenly adagio and joyful finale (albeit sligthly manic).

Who?

Lethevich

Quote from: haydnfan on April 21, 2011, 06:01:45 AM
Who?

Oh, sorry, I didn't notice he used dark to describe both Mahler and Bruckner - I meant the Bruckner pieces.
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

Sid

Quote from: eyeresist on April 21, 2011, 02:00:24 AM
You may be thinking of the 7th? Newbould's version of the 10th has only three movements and goes for about 27.30 (Marriner recording). (The 7th has four movements and goes for 38.20.)

This is the very recording of Schubert's 10th that I used to own (link to Amazon description below). It was on a quite obscure label, Ricercar. I'm sorry I got rid of it, because it was an interesting piece. Funny you mention the issue of movements. On the recording, this work consists of 4 movements, but when I saw it live at Sydney University during the late '90's, they only played 3 movements...

http://www.amazon.com/Franz-Schubert-Symphony-No-Major/dp/B000004502/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1303444777&sr=1-1

Mirror Image

Quote from: Sid on April 20, 2011, 11:59:53 PMBruckner's 9th symphony, as well as his 8th, are perhaps his finest creations. But I find them way too dark and they depress the **** out of me.

Dark? Really? Well we all hear different things. I didn't know you feel this way about the 8th and 9th, Sid. Interesting. What exactly depresses you about them?

Conor71


Sid

Quote from: Mirror Image on April 21, 2011, 08:08:53 PM
Dark? Really? Well we all hear different things. I didn't know you feel this way about the 8th and 9th, Sid. Interesting. What exactly depresses you about them?

Basically I feel that these two works, especially the 9th symphony, are like a story of humankind at odds with the universe. It's an epic battle in which man is reduced to the size of a pea in a vast inhospitable landscape. It's probably a wierd way of putting it, but this just about sums up how I feel. Also, the orchestral colouring is quite dark in these works. There is that brass fanfare which is quite hopeful in the final (3rd) movement of the 9th, but it's too little too late for me.

I tend to like the lighter symphonies of Bruckner & Mahler. My favourites by Bruckner are the 6th & 7th & Mahler's 4th is my favourite symphony by him...

abidoful

#37
Quote from: MDL on April 20, 2011, 03:12:50 PM
Anyone heard any of the various versions of the 4th movement of Bruckner 9; sketches or speculative completions? I'd be interested to have a vague idea of how Bruckner planned to finish that daunting, devastating 3rd movement.

Edit: "planned to follow", not "planned to finish", obviously. Durr.
I heard Harnoncourt conducting the finale sketches. It was very impressive, shame it's incomplete. The music stuck on me and haunts me...
Bruckner definately got my vote BTW.
Also the Sibelius Eight would've have been interesting i'm sure ::)

And I've always wondered what that Chopin Violin sonata would've been like...

eyeresist

Instead of adding an extra post, you can just modify the post you've already made. Just saying' :)

Sergeant Rock

Quote from: Mirror Image on April 21, 2011, 08:08:53 PM
Dark? Really? Well we all hear different things.

Like Sid I too hear the "unfinished" Ninth as quite dark, and the revised Eighth has that magnificent, and depressing, Coriolan-like coda to the first movement.

The first movement of the Ninth has a cataclysmic first climax and then it never lightens up. If, as a reviewer once wrote, the Eighth's Scherzo is the sound of the engine of heaven, then surely the Ninth's Scherzo is the engine of hell. And I've always heard the Ninth's Adagio as a tragic loss of faith (or innocence): those shrieking dissonances near the end gut-wrenching.

Sarge
the phone rings and somebody says,
"hey, they made a movie about
Mahler, you ought to go see it.
he was as f*cked-up as you are."
                               --Charles Bukowski, "Mahler"